Category: Europe

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Use of the Signal platform in diplomatic communications – E-001740/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The High Representative/Vice-President, Members of her Cabinet and members of staff may use instant messaging tools on their corporate devices for informal communication purposes.

    A data protection impact assessment is required only if there is a high risk to the rights and freedoms of natural persons in accordance with Article 39(1) of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725[1]. This is not the case when Signal is used, given that the scope of personal information shared via Signal is limited.

    The European External Action Service and the Commission have already issued guidelines on the use of instant messaging and group chat tools.

    Use of publicly available non-corporate tools is limited to the exceptional cases when corporate solutions cannot be used. The guidelines stipulate that only non-confidential information should be shared and discussed when using, for example, Signal.

    • [1] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2018/1725/oj/eng.
    Last updated: 2 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Impact of the Trump administration’s decision to impose tariffs on European goods: impact on the Galician automotive sector – E-001311/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Industrial Action Plan for the European automotive sector recognises the challenges of an increasingly volatile geopolitical context and their potential impact on the EU automotive sector.

    Therefore, the Commission has committed on decisive actions to help secure global competitiveness of the EU automotive value chain and maintain a strong European production base.

    In line with the Automotive Action Plan, the Commission has proposed already an amendment to the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for Displaced Workers Regulation[1], which will extend the support to workers in companies in restructuring processes.

    In addition, the mid-term review of the European Social Fund Plus (ESF+)[2] will be used to incentivise Member States to reprogramme more money for the automotive sector.

    Trade with the United States represents a source of prosperity and well-paying and quality jobs for the EU automotive value chain. The Commission is assessing the impact of the United States tariffs on EU automotive exports and will also monitor the indirect effects.

    The Commission will continue to seek a negotiated and constructive solution with the United States, while being ready to protect European interests.

    • [1]  COM(2025) 140.
    • [2] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:02021R1057-20241224.
    Last updated: 2 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – The use of diesel particulate filters by consumers and businesses in small EU Member States – E-001368/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The stringency of the Euro standards pushed most advanced filter technologies to be commonly used for diesel vehicles[1]. To ensure continued performance of diesel particulate filters (DPFs), regeneration strategies are incorporated in vehicles with DPFs.

    Filter regeneration cleans the DPF by temporarily increasing exhaust temperatures to burn accumulated soot. While highway driving provides optimal conditions, regeneration can also be triggered during short-distance trips.

    All vehicles, including those circulating mostly in urban conditions, can therefore provide a good level of environmental protection throughout their lifetime, as required by the roadworthiness regulations.

    Current vehicle emission regulations[2] have been developed to reflect real-world driving conditions, including short-distance trips. Such short trips are common all across the EU, particularly in cities, considering that approximately 50% of urban car trips are shorter than 6 km[3]. Urban conditions play important role in the determination of real-driving emissions[4].

    Directive (EU) 2024/1799[5] on common rules promoting the repair of goods aims at incentivising consumers to repair their defective goods and imposes an obligation on manufacturers of certain goods to offer repair services at a reasonable price.

    However, the problem at hand concerns the maintenance, i.e., activities to keep the DPFs in a condition where they are able to fulfil their intended purpose which are outside the scope of the directive.

    • [1] See particle numbers (‘PN’) and particle matters (‘PM’) limits requirements in Euro 5 and Euro 6 standards (Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2007 on type approval of motor vehicles with respect to emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 5 and Euro 6) and on access to vehicle repair and maintenance information — http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2007/715/oj) and in Euro 7 standards (Regulation (EU) 2024/1257 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 April 2024 on type-approval of motor vehicles and engines and of systems, components and separate technical units intended for such vehicles, with respect to their emissions and battery durability (Euro 7) — http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1257/oj).
    • [2] Particularly above-mentioned Euro 6 Regulation and Euro 7 Regulation.
    • [3] Vlachos, T., Bonnel, P., Weiss, M., Paffumi, E., Clairotte, M. et al., Including cold-start emissions in the Real-Driving Emissions (RDE) test procedure: An assessment of cold-start frequencies and emission effects, Publications Office, 2017, https://doi.org/10.2760/70237.
    • [4] See Annex IIIA to Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/1151 of 1 June 2017 supplementing Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council on type-approval of motor vehicles with respect to emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 5 and Euro 6) and on access to vehicle repair and maintenance information.
    • [5] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=OJ:L_202401799.
    Last updated: 2 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Latest news – Next Meeting of the D-MX Delegation: 9 July 2025 – Delegation to the EU-Mexico Joint Parliamentary Committee

    Source: European Parliament

    The next meeting of the Delegation to the EU-Mexico Joint Parliamentary Committee (D-MX) is scheduled for:

    Wednesday, 9 July 2025, 17.30-19.00

    Room: WEISS S4.5 (Strasbourg)

    The main item on the agenda is an “Exchange of views on the cooperation in fighting against transnational crime and drug trafficking”.

    Please note that this meeting will not be webstreamed due to limited resources.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Latest news – Next Meeting of the D-MX Delegation: 9 July 2025 – Delegation to the EU-Mexico Joint Parliamentary Committee

    Source: European Parliament

    The next meeting of the Delegation to the EU-Mexico Joint Parliamentary Committee (D-MX) is scheduled for:

    Wednesday, 9 July 2025, 17.30-19.00

    Room: WEISS S4.5 (Strasbourg)

    The main item on the agenda is an “Exchange of views on the cooperation in fighting against transnational crime and drug trafficking”.

    Please note that this meeting will not be webstreamed due to limited resources.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – High wage inequalities in the European Union – E-002555/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002555/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Galato Alexandraki (ECR)

    Despite the European Union’s principle of convergence, average wages still vary enormously between the Member States. According to recent data from 2023, the average monthly full-time wage in the EU was around EUR 3 155, dropping to less than EUR 1 125 in Bulgaria and reaching EUR 6 755 in Luxembourg. And although these disparities become narrower when purchasing power standards (PPS) are taken into account, significant inequalities persist. Low wages in many Eastern and Southern European countries, such as Greece, limit people’s ability to make a decent living and increase brain drain. While the EU has adopted the Minimum Wages Directive, it is unclear whether there are effective tools to ensure real convergence of incomes in terms of quality of life. This issue directly concerns social cohesion and the sustainability of economies.

    In view of the above, can the Commission say:

    • 1.Is there a plan to reduce disparities in average wages between Member States, not only in absolute terms but also taking into account purchasing power standards (PPS)?
    • 2.Does it envisage further regulatory action or financial support so that the wages in the countries with the lowest salaries can actually approach the European average in real terms?

    Submitted: 25.6.2025

    Last updated: 2 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – High wage inequalities in the European Union – E-002555/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002555/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Galato Alexandraki (ECR)

    Despite the European Union’s principle of convergence, average wages still vary enormously between the Member States. According to recent data from 2023, the average monthly full-time wage in the EU was around EUR 3 155, dropping to less than EUR 1 125 in Bulgaria and reaching EUR 6 755 in Luxembourg. And although these disparities become narrower when purchasing power standards (PPS) are taken into account, significant inequalities persist. Low wages in many Eastern and Southern European countries, such as Greece, limit people’s ability to make a decent living and increase brain drain. While the EU has adopted the Minimum Wages Directive, it is unclear whether there are effective tools to ensure real convergence of incomes in terms of quality of life. This issue directly concerns social cohesion and the sustainability of economies.

    In view of the above, can the Commission say:

    • 1.Is there a plan to reduce disparities in average wages between Member States, not only in absolute terms but also taking into account purchasing power standards (PPS)?
    • 2.Does it envisage further regulatory action or financial support so that the wages in the countries with the lowest salaries can actually approach the European average in real terms?

    Submitted: 25.6.2025

    Last updated: 2 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: RECOMMENDATION FOR A DECISION to raise no objections to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/530 of 12 June 2025 as regards its date of application – B10-0302/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    B10‑0302/2025

    Draft European Parliament decision to raise no objections to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/530 of 12 June 2025 as regards its date of application

    (C(2025)03819 – 2025/2766(DEA))

    The European Parliament,

     having regard to the Commission delegated regulation (C(2025)03819),

     having regard to the Commission’s letter of 6 June 2025 asking Parliament to declare that it will raise no objections to the delegated regulation,

     having regard to the letter from the Committee on International Trade to the Chair of the Conference of Committee Chairs of 25 June 2025,

     having regard to Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

     having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2173/2005 of 20 December 2005 on the establishment of a FLEGT licensing scheme for imports of timber into the European Community[1], and in particular Article 10(1) and (3) and Article 11a(5) thereof,

     having regard to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/530[2],

     having regard to Rule 114(6) of its Rules of Procedure,

     having regard to the recommendation for a decision of the Committee on International Trade,

    A. whereas Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/530 includes the Republic of Ghana and its Timber Industry Development Division in the list in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 2173/2005, and the list of products covered by the Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade (FLEGT) licensing scheme in Annex III to that Regulation; whereas the trade in timber between the Union and Ghana is regulated by Voluntary Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Ghana on forest law enforcement, governance and trade in timber products into the Community (Agreement)[3]; whereas Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/530 is to apply from 8 July 2025;

    B. whereas preparations for issuing FLEGT licences are taking longer than expected and Ghana will start issuing FLEGT licences on 30 June 2025 at the earliest; whereas shipments from Ghana take between two and eight weeks to reach the Union, causing a risk that shipments leaving Ghana before 30 June 2025 but reaching the Union after 8 July 2025 will not be accompanied by a FLEGT licence and will thus not be able to enter the Union;

    C. whereas there is a significant risk that timber shipments arriving in the Union as from 8 July 2025 may not be covered by a FLEGT licence as they may have been shipped before Ghana starts issuing FLEGT licences; whereas this could generate trade disruption, undermine the credibility of the Agreement as a trade facilitating instrument and have a negative impact on economic operators both in Ghana and in the Union;

    D. whereas the date from which Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/530 applies should be adapted, in order to allow sufficient time for shipments leaving Ghana before 30 June 2025 to reach the Union without the obligation to be covered by a FLEGT licence;

    E. whereas Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/530 should therefore be amended accordingly;

    1. Declares that it has no objections to the delegated regulation;

    2. Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and the Commission.

     

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: RECOMMENDATION FOR A DECISION to raise no objections to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/530 of 12 June 2025 as regards its date of application – B10-0302/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    B10‑0302/2025

    Draft European Parliament decision to raise no objections to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/530 of 12 June 2025 as regards its date of application

    (C(2025)03819 – 2025/2766(DEA))

    The European Parliament,

     having regard to the Commission delegated regulation (C(2025)03819),

     having regard to the Commission’s letter of 6 June 2025 asking Parliament to declare that it will raise no objections to the delegated regulation,

     having regard to the letter from the Committee on International Trade to the Chair of the Conference of Committee Chairs of 25 June 2025,

     having regard to Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

     having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2173/2005 of 20 December 2005 on the establishment of a FLEGT licensing scheme for imports of timber into the European Community[1], and in particular Article 10(1) and (3) and Article 11a(5) thereof,

     having regard to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/530[2],

     having regard to Rule 114(6) of its Rules of Procedure,

     having regard to the recommendation for a decision of the Committee on International Trade,

    A. whereas Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/530 includes the Republic of Ghana and its Timber Industry Development Division in the list in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 2173/2005, and the list of products covered by the Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade (FLEGT) licensing scheme in Annex III to that Regulation; whereas the trade in timber between the Union and Ghana is regulated by Voluntary Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Ghana on forest law enforcement, governance and trade in timber products into the Community (Agreement)[3]; whereas Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/530 is to apply from 8 July 2025;

    B. whereas preparations for issuing FLEGT licences are taking longer than expected and Ghana will start issuing FLEGT licences on 30 June 2025 at the earliest; whereas shipments from Ghana take between two and eight weeks to reach the Union, causing a risk that shipments leaving Ghana before 30 June 2025 but reaching the Union after 8 July 2025 will not be accompanied by a FLEGT licence and will thus not be able to enter the Union;

    C. whereas there is a significant risk that timber shipments arriving in the Union as from 8 July 2025 may not be covered by a FLEGT licence as they may have been shipped before Ghana starts issuing FLEGT licences; whereas this could generate trade disruption, undermine the credibility of the Agreement as a trade facilitating instrument and have a negative impact on economic operators both in Ghana and in the Union;

    D. whereas the date from which Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/530 applies should be adapted, in order to allow sufficient time for shipments leaving Ghana before 30 June 2025 to reach the Union without the obligation to be covered by a FLEGT licence;

    E. whereas Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/530 should therefore be amended accordingly;

    1. Declares that it has no objections to the delegated regulation;

    2. Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and the Commission.

     

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Combating the misuse of national symbols on food packaging – E-001805/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    1. Pursuant to Article 26(3) of Regulation No 1169/2011[1], where the country of origin or place of provenance of a food is given and it is not the same as that of its primary ingredient, the country of origin or place of provenance of the primary ingredient in question needs also to be declared or, at least, indicated as being different to that of the food.

    2. Article 26(3) first subparagraph of the regulation No 1169/2011 sets out conditions for the application of specific labelling requirements for primary ingredients. Where food business operators opt to only indicate the country of origin or place of provenance of the primary ingredient as being different to that of the food, for example because of multiple or variable supply sources and particular production processes, the rules stipulated by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/775[2] are to be followed. The relevant indication should ensure comprehensible information to the consumer.

    • [1] Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on the provision of food information to consumers, amending Regulations (EC) No 1924/2006 and (EC) No 1925/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and repealing Commission Directive 87/250/EEC, Council Directive 90/496/EEC, Commission Directive 1999/10/EC, Directive 2000/13/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, Commission Directives 2002/67/EC and 2008/5/EC and Commission Regulation (EC) No 608/2004 OJ L 304, 22.11.2011, p. 18-63.
    • [2] Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/775 of 28 May 2018 laying down rules for the application of Article 26(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the provision of food information to consumers, as regards the rules for indicating the country of origin or place of provenance of the primary ingredient of a food OJ L 131, 29.5.2018, p. 8-11.
    Last updated: 2 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Combating the misuse of national symbols on food packaging – E-001805/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    1. Pursuant to Article 26(3) of Regulation No 1169/2011[1], where the country of origin or place of provenance of a food is given and it is not the same as that of its primary ingredient, the country of origin or place of provenance of the primary ingredient in question needs also to be declared or, at least, indicated as being different to that of the food.

    2. Article 26(3) first subparagraph of the regulation No 1169/2011 sets out conditions for the application of specific labelling requirements for primary ingredients. Where food business operators opt to only indicate the country of origin or place of provenance of the primary ingredient as being different to that of the food, for example because of multiple or variable supply sources and particular production processes, the rules stipulated by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/775[2] are to be followed. The relevant indication should ensure comprehensible information to the consumer.

    • [1] Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on the provision of food information to consumers, amending Regulations (EC) No 1924/2006 and (EC) No 1925/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and repealing Commission Directive 87/250/EEC, Council Directive 90/496/EEC, Commission Directive 1999/10/EC, Directive 2000/13/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, Commission Directives 2002/67/EC and 2008/5/EC and Commission Regulation (EC) No 608/2004 OJ L 304, 22.11.2011, p. 18-63.
    • [2] Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/775 of 28 May 2018 laying down rules for the application of Article 26(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the provision of food information to consumers, as regards the rules for indicating the country of origin or place of provenance of the primary ingredient of a food OJ L 131, 29.5.2018, p. 8-11.
    Last updated: 2 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Africa: South Africa looks to global lessons as it sharpens its focus on gender priorities at G20

    Source: South Africa News Agency

    South Africa looks to global lessons as it sharpens its focus on gender priorities at G20

    As the G20 Technical Meetings continue in South Africa, a powerful voice is emerging from within the country’s leadership, calling for bolder and more targeted investments in women, youth, and persons with disabilities. 

    Advocate Joyce Mikateko Maluleke, the Chairperson of the G20 Empowerment Women Working Group (EWWG) and Director-General of the Department of Women, Youth and Persons with Disabilities, told SAnews that South Africa is drawing critical lessons from global partners to respond to some of its most urgent challenges.

    The Third Technical Meeting of the G20 EWWG is currently taking place at the Skukuza Conference Centre at the Kruger National Park in Mpumalanga.   

    “There’s a lot that, as a country, we are learning from other countries. We have three priorities: valuing the care economy – both paid and unpaid; unlocking genuine financial inclusion for women, and eradicating gender-based violence and femicide,” Maluleke said. 

    Maluleke began by addressing the crisis of gender-based violence and femicide (GBVF), which she said continues to tear through the country’s social fabric.

    “Gender-based violence is a crisis in South Africa. It’s really one thing that, as a country, we want to learn from other countries. Other countries have done so many things… for prevention, even regulating access to social media, because one of the biggest challenges is that our children have a lot of unlimited access to the internet at an early age. Other countries shared that they control what young persons have access to,” she explained.

    From controlling explicit media to implementing surveillance technologies that aid in prevention and justice, Maluleke said there is much to learn from. 

    “They have used technology to protect women. For example, you find that there’s a surveillance camera every few meters. It does help because they can follow up… They have invested in prevention,” she said. 

    Investing in strong family support structures, something other countries do well, is an area where South Africa must improve. Maluleke said this is one of the biggest prevention measures that the country needs to adopt.  

    On financial inclusion, Maluleke highlighted the need to replicate successful international models that empower women from the ground up.

    “We’ve learned from them… The support they give to women in businesses starts from their education systems. Countries like Germany have invested in vocational training, and they have elevated artisanship to the same level as those that went to university,” she said. 

    In Germany, Maluleke noted, 60% of learners pursue technical training, while only 40% go to university. 

    “That’s why Germany is so strong in terms of engineering and [technical fields],” she remarked.

    The third priority, which is care work, remains an often-overlooked economic force, Maluleke said.

    “Most countries have indicated that [care work] is a strong, unseen engine of the economy. Women will stay at home to raise children and to look after those who are sick…” she said, urging for an investment in systems that allow for a balance between work and life commitments.

    “Care work, they say, is work of love. Yes, we love our parents, but we must still be able to live,” Maluleke emphasised.

    On prevention strategies for GBVF, the Director-General stressed the urgent need to shift focus and budget accordingly.

    “… [UN Women] said: ‘Preventing gender-based violence is not expensive. Not preventing gender-based violence is expensive.” It costs [a lot to raise] children [whose] families… are not able to [take them] to school, who won’t be able to contribute to the GDP… and who [might] end up getting involved in substance abuse, and to rehabilitate them is expensive,” she said. 

    Towards a stronger declaration and legacy

    As deliberations continue, South Africa is preparing for the signing of a declaration that addresses its three focus areas, namely, care work, financial inclusion and GBVF. 

    Maluleke explained that every working group works on the technical meetings, which will culminate in the declaration that will be signed by Ministers in the G20 when they meet. 

    She emphasised that a key objective is to secure tangible outcomes from the G20 engagement.

    “One of the achievements that we would like to achieve is that the financial sector needs to ensure that when Ministers sign the declaration as a product… they also launch a legacy project,” she added. 

    Indeed, one such legacy project is already in the pipeline.

    “We already have the World Bank… The World Bank will be launching, as a legacy project of the South African G20 Presidency, a financial facility on care work.

    “Women, who are running ECDs [Early Childhood Development Centres], will be able to apply for funding from that fund. They will launch it at the Minister’s meeting,” Maluleke said. 

    Consensus and Positive Masculinity 

    With 21 countries now part of the G20, following the African Union’s recent inclusion, building consensus remains a major hurdle. 

    “All of them must consent to the declaration. That’s why we’re starting the negotiations today… and even tomorrow, we will be negotiating,” Maluleke said. 

    Alongside the declaration, South Africa is preparing another powerful intervention: a conference on positive masculinity.

    “Masculinity shouldn’t destroy. It should protect,” Maluleke said. 

    The event will bring together G20 countries, guest nations, and international organisations, aiming to change the mindset of men and reframe masculinity as a force for protection and empowerment.

    “There are countries that have reduced gender-based violence. They say gender-based violence can be prevented, but you have to invest in that prevention.

    “Gender-based violence doesn’t discriminate… All of us have to make sure that we prevent it so that we protect our girls,” the Director-General said. 

    As negotiations unfold and commitments solidify, South Africa is poised to drive meaningful change – not just at home but across the G20 platform by aligning global best practices with local action, and by ensuring no one is left behind in the fight for dignity, equity and justice. – SAnews.gov.za 

    DikelediM

    MIL OSI Africa

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Result of public consultation on local access guidance at Loch Ruthven

    Source: Scotland – Highland Council

    Feedback has been collated from a public consultation launched by The Highland Council that could help protect a rare species of bird at Loch Ruthven near Farr, south of Inverness.

    The entire UK breeding population of Slavonian Grebes is usually found in lochs within 30 miles of Inverness. The number of breeding pairs on the loch has declined from a long-term average of 13 to just 3 in 2024. The consultation was launched to develop local access guidance at Loch Ruthven that could help protect the birds during their breeding season.

    The consultation closed on 16 May with 239 people responding to the invitation for opinions and ideas on a proposal to ask people not to canoe, paddleboard or swim at the east end of the loch between 1 March and 31 August.

    Responses have shown considerable support for the proposal with 88% of respondents believing the idea to be reasonable and acceptable. Many qualified their support saying that research into the causes of the decline in Slavonian Grebes was needed, along with education and publicity about the birds’ plight.

    15 people said they would not agree to the guidance, with most concerned about how it might affect their rights to fish the loch. Those rights are private and will remain unaffected.

    Others who did not support the proposal felt that the case against swimmers, paddleboarders and canoeists was not proven and that more research was needed into the causes of the decline. They too felt that more education and information was needed for water sports enthusiasts visiting the loch.

    The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (Scotland) manages land at the east end of the loch with the help of a ranger and volunteers and will continue to monitor activity at the loch whilst helping people understand what is being asked of them and why. Proposals for a wider and more in-depth study into why Slavonian Grebes numbers are declining are also in the pipeline. These measures will be useful when determining if the local access guidance is effective in protecting the birds.

    With the majority of respondents backing the proposal – including clubs and organisations representing paddle sports – Highland Council will support the message asking people to avoid swimming, paddleboarding or canoeing at the east of the loch until the end of August 2025. The effectiveness of this local access guidance will be reviewed after the 2025 breeding season.

    2 Jul 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Community benefits funding delivers educational resources to Highland schools

    Source: Scotland – Highland Council

    Highland Council has provided 12 ‘Talking Tub’ resources for use in primary schools across the Highlands, in partnership with Union Technical who deliver community benefits as part of the Energy Efficient Scotland: Area Based Scheme programme.

    Chair of Highland Council’s Education Committee, Councillor John Finlayson, said: “This is a fantastic initiative being rolled out across Highland primary schools which brings innovation and inspiration to early years children. Talking Tubs are educational resources designed to be borrowed by early years providers to enhance learning around a particular topic or theme and these boxes focus on construction and green energy.

    “The goal is to help children begin developing the foundational skills and curiosity needed for future careers in energy and construction—sectors that are vital to the sustainability and growth of the Highlands. By using the Talking Tubs as a playful learning tool, educators can introduce children to a broader spectrum of jobs and skills beyond the traditional roles they may already see in their local areas. This initiative not only supports early learning and development but also strengthens community ties by highlighting local industries and the exciting possibilities they hold for the next generation.”

    Each tub is thoughtfully curated with a variety of engaging materials including wooden construction toys, Lego sets, house building bricks, engineering and construction children’s books, puzzles, hard hats and hi-vis vests, all aimed at encouraging children to explore real-world themes through imaginative play and providing awareness for future careers.  

    The Energy Efficient Scotland: Area Based Scheme (EES:ABS) programme is a Scottish Government programme and offers eligible Highland residents grant funding for energy efficiency measures including external wall insulation, cavity wall insulation, loft insulation, air source heat pump and solar panels with battery storage, which can result in significant savings on household energy bills.

    Managed locally by Highland Council, the scheme is currently delivered by Union Technical and has funded upgrades for thousands of homes across the Highlands using Government grants and other support.

    Highland Council receiving the Talking Tubs from Union Technical

    St Columbus Primary School receiving a Talking Tub

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Community invited to help shape Dingwall 800 celebrations

    Source: Scotland – Highland Council

    To mark 800 years since Dingwall became a Royal Burgh, a year-long programme of celebrations is being planned for 2026 and local residents, community groups and businesses are now being invited to get involved in shaping this major milestone for the Highland town.

    Fèis Rois, in partnership with The Highland Council, Dingwall Community Council, Dingwall Community Development Company, and other local organisations, is coordinating the Dingwall 800 programme, with a focus on “Telling Dingwall’s Story – Past, Present & Future.”

    Two public drop-in information sessions will be held in July for anyone interested in learning more, sharing ideas, or getting involved.

    These will be held at the Fèis Rois office in Robertson House, Dingwall on Monday 14th July from 6-8pm and Thursday 17th July from 2-4pm.

    All are welcome to attend.

    Fèis Rois, one of Scotland’s top traditional arts organisations and based in Dingwall, is particularly keen to hear from local groups, individuals, creatives and businesses interested in participating in or supporting the 2026 celebrations.

    As part of the preparations, a logo design competition is being launched for young people aged 8 to 25.

    The winning logo will represent the Dingwall 800 celebrations across all publicity materials.

    Young creatives are invited to create a logo inspired by Dingwall, its history, people, and future.

    Entries may be hand-drawn, painted, or created digitally. The deadline for entries is Sunday 31st August and you can find entry details at www.feisrois.org.

    The winning design will be used across all Dingwall 800 marketing materials and the winner will also receive a £300 voucher for Fèis Rois, which can be used for a year of weekly music classes or to attend a residential course.

    There will also be two runner-up prizes.

    Siobhan MacIntyre, the recently appointed Dingwall 800 Event Producer, commented: “This is an exciting opportunity for young people to contribute to a historic event and have their creativity recognised as part of a major community celebration.  I’m sure that come next year there won’t be a single person in Dingwall who doesn’t recognise the Dingwall 800 logo!”

    Siobhan, who took up her role in June in between working at Glastonbury Festival where she has worked as part of the producing team for over a decade, is from the Highlands and is a graduate of the Royal Conservatoire of Scotland in Technical and Production Arts Management.

    As well as Glastonbury, she has worked across the UK and internationally on large-scale arena tours including Catherine Tate, Strictly: The Professionals, and Steve Backshall Live.

    Siobhan added: “I’m excited to contribute to Fèis Rois, the community of Dingwall, and be part of celebrating and supporting Scotland’s rich cultural heritage”

    Highland Council’s Dingwall and Seaforth Area Committee Chair, Cllr Graham MacKenzie, said: “We are delighted to welcome Siobhan to the new post of events producer as we prepare to celebrate the 800th anniversary of Dingwall becoming a Royal Burgh.

    “In May the Dingwall and Seaforth Committee of Highland Council agreed to allocate funds to Fèis Rois to help recruit Siobhan. She has an impressive career background in high-quality cultural and arts events, and will now lead on the delivery of an ambitious and exciting programme of work to mark this special milestone.”

    2026 promises to be a major year for the town and surrounding area. Dingwall 800 events will help drive tourism and boost economic growth, as well as to deliver other priorities previously identified in our area-based plan.”

    To find out more about the drop-in sessions or logo competition, please visit www.feisrois.org.

    PR issued by Katie MacKenzie PR

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Community-Led Local Development Fund distributes over £900k to support projects in Highland

    Source: Scotland – Highland Council

    The Highland Strategic Local Action Group (LAG) met in June 2025 and considered and agreed funding for 28 projects submitted to the Community-Led Local Development fund (CLLD), which makes up part of The Highland Council Community Regeneration Fund (CRF) programme.

    CRF is an umbrella term used to cover multiple external funding programmes administered by The Highland Council.  Decisions on which projects are to receive CLLD funding are taken by the Highland Strategic Local Action Group. This decision-making group is made up of third sector representatives, public agencies, and private organisations.    

    Chair of The Highland Council’s Economy and Infrastructure Committee, Councillor Ken Gowans, said: “It is the fourth year in a row that we have been successful in securing a large allocation of CLLD funding from the Scottish Government. This funding is essential to support grass roots economic regeneration, allowing communities to grow and develop new opportunities.”

    “We welcome the continued investment by the Scottish Government in our  rural communities and are proud to support community groups and witness the significant and lasting impact these projects have across the Highlands.

    “I wish everyone working hard to turn their plans into reality all the very best.”

    The CLLD Fund continues to play a vital role in supporting grassroots initiatives that foster resilience, inclusivity, and innovation in rural communities. From Caithness down to Lochaber, the funding will empower local groups and organisations to deliver impactful projects tailored to the unique needs of their communities. These include feasibility studies, building renovations, renewable energy installations, youth services, and community transport programmes.

    This follows on from a successful 2024/25 CLLD round where over £1.4 million was allocated to 52 community groups across the Highlands. Across Highland, the overall social return on investment for the 2024/25 CLLD round was £3.46 for every £1 of funding invested. In total projects spent returned a social value of £6,065,874. 

    CLLD 2025-26 approved projects:

    The Dornoch Area Community Interest Company: The Dornoch Community Transport Project –  £36,861.00 
    Lochview Rural Training Centre: Land Based Training Equipment – £12,954.00 
    Fearn Amenities SCIO : Groundworks At Fearn Pavillion  – £14,685.00 
    Edinbane Community Company:  Edinbane Shop Technical Design –  £15,000.00 
    Linnhe Leisure:  Sound & Lighting  –  £83,331.97 
    Lochaber Hope:  New Connections  –  £11,439.52 
    Poolewe and District Swimming Pool association: Sustain the Pool  –  £21,000.00 
    Wick Community Hub:  Sensory Room Space –  £30,000.00 
    Farmer Jones Academy c.i.c : Sensory Dome and Play Equipment –  £57,000.00 
    Rosemarkie Amenities Association (RAA): Upgrading of Rosemarkie Promenade – £35,357.00 
    Dornie & District Community Trust:  Dornie Hub – £31,329.84 
    Mallaig & Morar Community Centre Association: Energy Efficiency Improvements – £2,961.99
    Arisaig Community Trust:  Playpark Project –  £22,343.32 
    Evanton Community Cinema:Equipment Purchase and Installation – £32,201.20 
    Wick Development Trust: Path Upgrade & Motorhome Waste Service – £52,329.24 
    Mallaig Pool & Leisure: Upgrade of Gym and Sauna – £100,000.00 
    Dementia Friendly Communities Ltd: Dinner To Your Door Delivery Vehicle – £27,279.00 
    Ormlie Community Association Ltd: New Meeting Room & Services –  £6,694.00 
    North Kessock Village Hall: North Kessock Village Hall Renovation –  £17,000.00 
    Isle of Eigg Heritage Trust:  New Signage and Trails  –   £9,945.00 
    Isle of Eigg Heritage Trust: Net Zero Housing – Phase 2 (NZH-2) – £76,596.00 
    Go Golspie Development Trust: New Electric Community Car – £34,369.00 
    Farr North Community Development Trust: Community Transport – Farr Goes –  £17,664.00 
    Glenelg and Arnisdale Development Trust: Glenelg Playpark – £27,077.00 
    Fox & Friends Highland: Disabled Friendly Bathroom –  £38,000.00
    Sutherland Resilience Initiative: Community Transport – £57,260.00
    Applecross Community Company:  Affordable Housing Project –  £44,600.00 
    The Place Youth Club:  Disabled Access Project  –  £50,000.00 

     

     

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: LCQ21: Controlling expenditure on public works projects

    Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

    ​Following is a question by the Hon Chan Siu-hung and a written reply by the Secretary for Development, Ms Bernadette Linn, in the Legislative Council today (July 2):

    Question:

    It is learnt that public works expenditures involving infrastructure, healthcare, education, housing, and so on account for a substantial proportion of government spending. However, there are views pointing out that the model of division of labour in which policy bureaux or government departments, as “users”, only need to specify the requirements and functions during the planning stage of a project, leaving the subsequent processes such as design and construction to be spearheaded by technical departments like the Civil Engineering and Development Department or the Architectural Services Department, is prone to result in user departments lacking awareness of project budget control and losing sight of cost-effectiveness, whereas the technical departments may need to adopt more costly building designs, methods, or materials, among others, in a bid to meet the individual requirements of user departments, hence driving up the cost of works even at the inception stage (i.e. the “upstream stage”) of the project. Therefore, various government departments should shift their mindset towards upholding an “awareness of being property owners” to take the lead in formulating a reasonable budget right at the early stage of project planning and strictly monitor its implementation. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:

    (1) whether it will consider strengthening various government departments’ awareness of being property owners, with a view to exercising stringent control over the estimates of expenditure at the upstream stage of public works projects; if so, of the details; if not, the reasons for that;

    (2) of the strategies and specific measures implemented by the Project Strategy and Governance Office under the Development Bureau at various stages (including upstream, midstream and downstream) of public works to reduce project cost; whether an assessment has been conducted on the respective effectiveness of these strategies and measures; and

    (3) whether it has drawn on the cost control measures adopted by the Mainland and various places in the world at the upstream stage of public works; if not, of the reasons for that; if so, the details, including whether such measures encompass a concept similar to the awareness of being property owners?

    Reply:

    President,

    The Development Bureau (DEVB) established the Project Cost Management Office in 2016 and upgraded it to become the Project Strategy and Governance Office (PSGO) in April 2019 for formulating and implementing strategic initiatives and enhancing capabilities in cost surveillance and project governance to public works projects. On monitoring project estimates of public works, there is a set of stringent vetting mechanisms in place. While not compromising the functionality, quality and safety of works, the PSGO, as an independent third party, participates in project cost vetting from project inception stage in accordance with the “fitness-for-purpose and no frills” principle, and will follow up on project development and design optimisation and continuously monitor the performance of the projects during construction stage, and implement suitable measures for cost saving.

    Our responses to the three parts of the question are as follows:

    (1) At different project implementation stages, the works departments have been maintaining communication with the project proponent policy bureaux, providing advice to the project proponent policy bureaux on project planning and design, cost estimation, progress, etc. In addition, senior management of project proponent policy bureaux participated in the project management and leadership development programme under the Centre of Excellence for Major Project Leaders under​ the DEVB to reinforce and strengthen their understanding of project cost management and ensure that public funds are used properly. To further enhance capabilities in cost surveillance and project governance, the DEVB is working with the Financial Services and the Treasury Bureau to study on optimising the preparatory and conceptual work before project inception, with emphasis on strengthening the review of site selection, usage mix, scale, design, implementation programme, etc, by the project proponent policy bureaux and user departments. This will help the project proponent policy bureaux and user departments to comprehensively evaluate the cost-effectiveness of different implementation proposals with the “ownership” mindset, so as to formulate practical and cost-effective proposals. By planning ahead the overall estimates before project inception, the project cost-effectiveness can be further enhanced. We are currently formulating relevant details and guidelines, with the relevant measures planned to be implemented within this year.

    (2) The PSGO vigorously scrutinises cost estimates of public works projects. During the project inception stage, we also examine the technical feasibility statement submitted by the works departments to establish the technical feasibility of the project and review the preliminary cost estimate and cash flow requirements.

    During the design stage, we liaise with project proponent policy bureaux and user departments to enhance project cost-effectiveness, reduce cost and minimise risk of cost overrun through design optimisation by means of exploring different design options, construction methods and procurement models. We also carry out benchmarking with costs of other similar projects and make reference to the prevailing market situation, to ensure that the project estimates are reasonable. Furthermore, the Government adopts parallel tendering before submitting funding application of the projects to the Legislative Council so as to accurately reflect the tender prices in the approved project estimate for better financial management of the projects to reduce the risk of cost overrun.

    During the construction stage, the DEVB regularly conducts high-level meetings with works departments, complemented with the established Integrated Capital Works Platform, enabling management of different departments to grasp the real-time performance of each project, closely monitor the implementation programme of projects and provide timely intervention so as to mitigate the risks of project cost overrun and delays. At the same time, the PSGO also examines major variations in projects during the construction period and provides independent advice to works departments to ensure the cost-effectiveness of the major variations.

    Since its establishment, the PSGO has scrutinised more than 540 capital works projects, and successfully saved about $190 billion (about 16 per cent) in construction cost out of the original estimate of about $1,200 billion proposed by the project proponent policy bureaux.

    In addition, the overall cost management performance of the Capital Works Programme has all along been well performed. In the past ten years, there were 575 Category A projects approved by the Finance Committee of the Legislative Council, and so far only 15 projects required budget increase. Besides, in the past ten years, the total expenditure of the 510 Category A projects with their final accounts settled (including expenditure of the additional funding) was about 90 per cent of the total original approved project estimates.

    The DEVB has completed the strategic study on relatively high construction costs in Hong Kong. We will progressively launch the relevant cost control measures along the following four directions, which includes (i) optimising the project procurement model, (ii) reviewing the design standards and requirements, (iii) applying advanced technologies and construction methods, and (iv) streamlining the approval process, once they are ready so as to reduce the construction costs.

    (3) The Government has been liaising and actively exchanging project management experience with other authorities, including the Mainland, Singapore and the United Kingdom, to enhance the project delivery capabilities and performance. For example, the DEVB signed the Letter of Intent on Strengthening Guangdong-Hong Kong Cooperation in Construction and Related Engineering Sectors with the Department of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of Guangdong Province to deepen the co-operation in construction and engineering sectors between Guangdong and Hong Kong. We also signed a Memorandum of Understanding each with the Centre for Public Project Management of the Ministry of Finance of Singapore and the Infrastructure and Projects Authority, part of the Cabinet Office and HM Treasury of the United Kingdom, in December 2022 and February 2023 respectively. The DEVB also organised the Project Cost Management Forum to allow local and overseas industry leaders to exchange views and share experiences regarding project cost control. Among them, we make reference to the process and experience of implementing projects in the Mainland, as well as their practices for optimising construction programme. In addition, we understand that the Singapore government is involved in the upstream process of project planning to review the scope, design and cost reasonableness of the projects, and enhance the cost-effectiveness of the projects by revising the scope of the projects or optimising the design. We will continue to make reference to the experience of project cost control in different places and formulate comprehensive and systematic measures to manage project costs.

    Ends/Wednesday, July 2, 2025
    Issued at HKT 19:26

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the human cost of Russia’s war against Ukraine and the urgent need to end Russian aggression: the situation of illegally detained civilians and prisoners of war, and the continued bombing of civilians – B10-0304/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Sergey Lagodinsky, Markéta Gregorová, Ville Niinistö, Jutta Paulus, Mārtiņš Staķis
    on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

    B10‑0304/2025

    European Parliament resolution on the human cost of Russia’s war against Ukraine and the urgent need to end Russian aggression: the situation of illegally detained civilians and prisoners of war and the continued bombing of civilians

    (2025/2710(RSP))

    The European Parliament,

     having regard to its previous resolutions on Ukraine and Russia,

     having regard to the UN Charter, the Hague Conventions, the Geneva Conventions and the additional protocols thereto, and the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court,

     having regard to Rule 136(2) of its Rules of Procedure,

    A. whereas three years ago, on 24 February 2022, the Russian Federation launched an unprovoked, unjustified and illegal war of aggression against Ukraine, in gross violation of the UN Charter and its own international commitments, including the Helsinki Final Act of the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe, the Budapest Memorandum on Security Assurances and the Treaty on Friendship, Cooperation and Partnership between Ukraine and the Russian Federation; whereas the Russian aggression against Ukraine started in 2014 with the occupation of parts of the Donbas region and the occupation and annexation of Ukraine’s Autonomous Republic of Crimea;

    B. whereas since then, Russian forces have continued to carry out and escalate indiscriminate attacks against residential areas and civilian infrastructure; whereas heavy and intense bombardments, combined with ground fighting, have continued throughout 2025; whereas the UN has confirmed that more than 12 500 civilians, including hundreds of children, have been murdered since February 2022; whereas the actual civilian death toll is estimated to be in the tens of thousands; whereas many more civilians have been injured, tortured, forcibly ‘re-educated’, harassed, raped, kidnapped or forcibly displaced;

    C. whereas while their exact numbers are unknown, thousands of Ukrainians, both military personnel and civilians, are likely to be held in captivity currently, in Russia and occupied Ukraine;

    D. whereas the vast majority of Ukrainian prisoners, both civilian and military personnel, held by the Russian Federation are deprived of any recognised legal status or procedural safeguards, leaving them without rights, legal representation or the ability to contact their families; whereas in 90 % of cases, relatives do not know whether their loved ones are alive;

    E. whereas there is documented evidence of repeated extrajudicial executions of prisoners of war (POWs) and civilians by members of the armed forces of the Russian Federation, as well as other grave violations of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the Geneva Conventions and other international humanitarian law instruments;

    F. whereas the Russian authorities have launched thousands of politically motivated criminal prosecutions against Ukrainian POWs and civilian detainees, often based on confessions extracted under torture and without credible evidence; whereas these fabricated charges commonly include terrorism, espionage and treason, with the charges of treason frequently following the forced imposition of Russian citizenship in the temporarily occupied territories of Ukraine;

    G. whereas families of Ukrainian detainees face institutional barriers to accessing legal recourse or filing official inquiries, as the Russian state requires the use of domestic digital identification platforms that are not accessible to non-citizens; whereas in some cases, relatives advocating publicly for detainees have seen their loved ones punished with extended sentences or re-arrested on additional charges;

    H. whereas the death of Ukrainian journalist Viktoriia Roshchyna in Russian captivity highlights the grave and growing dangers faced by Ukrainian journalists held by Russian forces; whereas others, including Iryna Danylovych, Dmytro Khyliuk and Iryna and Heorhiy Levchenko, remain in detention under life-threatening conditions;

    I. whereas the Russian authorities consistently deny POWs access to international organisations in an effort to hide the atrocities taking place, leaving POWs even more vulnerable to violations of international law; whereas the Geneva Conventions guarantee POWs the right to regular correspondence, access to medical care, and visits from international organisations; whereas Russia’s treatment of Ukrainian POWs amounts to war crimes and crimes against humanity;

    J. whereas the Russian authorities have detained large numbers of civilians in all temporarily occupied areas of Ukraine; whereas they target, among others, local authorities, civil servants and journalists; whereas the scale at which Russia is conducting these enforced disappearances against civilians is clearly in compliance with a coordinated state policy;

    K. whereas in all temporarily occupied areas of Ukraine, Russian-installed proxy paramilitary structures and de facto authorities have played a key role in implementing Russia’s policy of repression and terror against the Ukrainian population by systematically engaging in intimidation, arbitrary detentions, torture and enforced disappearances of civilians under the guise of administrative or security procedures;

    L. whereas many victims of enforced disappearances are transferred either to local detention facilities or deported to Russia; whereas various forms of torture are reportedly commonplace in these detention facilities; whereas civilians regularly go missing for months if not years, with some dying in detention; whereas these acts also amount to crimes against humanity;

    M. whereas since the occupation and annexation of Crimea in 2014, the Russian Federation has systematically targeted Crimean Tatars with politically motivated prosecutions, enforced disappearances, intimidation and harassment; whereas Crimean Tatar leaders, journalists, civil society activists and religious figures have faced disproportionate repression, including under the guise of anti-extremism and antiterrorism charges; whereas these actions amount to violations of international human rights and humanitarian law and aim to erase the identity and presence of the indigenous Crimean Tatar people;

    N. whereas cases of punitive psychiatry, including forced institutionalisation, drugging and involuntary treatment of both children and adults, have been documented in at least 42 psychiatric institutions and psycho-neurological boarding schools located in the temporarily occupied territories of Ukraine; whereas Russian occupying authorities have revived Soviet-style psychiatric abuse as a tool of repression, targeting individuals for their perceived pro-Ukrainian views or their refusal to accept Russian citizenship; whereas such acts represent a serious breach of the United Nations Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment and the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities;

    O. whereas the families are left traumatised as their loved ones are held incommunicado and the Russian authorities, in full violation of international law, refuse to provide information about people’s whereabouts;

    P. whereas the UN’s Independent International Commission of Inquiry on Ukraine confirmed, in its latest report of March 2025, that the enforced disappearances committed by the Russian authorities in a widespread and systematic manner against the civilian population, in the context of Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, amount to crimes against humanity; whereas the same body documented countless cases proving that Russia’s use of sexual violence, including rape, as a form of torture is systemic in detention facilities and that this practice is clearly a deliberate policy, thus stressing that the Russian authorities committed the war crimes of rape and sexual violence as a form of torture;

    Q. whereas the Yale Humanitarian Research Lab, whose Ukraine Conflict Observatory has been documenting Russia’s abduction of Ukrainian children using biometric and satellite data and supported six International Criminal Court (ICC) indictments, has had its funding cut by the Trump administration; whereas the observatory has ceased all its work collecting data crucial for achieving accountability as of 1 July 2025; whereas the observatory’s database contains records on more than 30 000 Ukrainian children allegedly abducted by Russia from over 100 locations;

    1. Condemns, in the strongest possible terms, Russia’s continued war of aggression against Ukraine and demands that Russia immediately terminate all military activities in Ukraine, unconditionally withdraw all forces and military equipment from the entire internationally recognised territory of Ukraine and compensate Ukraine for the damage caused to its people, land and infrastructure;

    2. Expresses its undivided solidarity with the people of Ukraine, fully supports Ukraine’s independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity within its internationally recognised borders, and underlines that this war constitutes a serious violation of international law;

    3. Decries Russia’s policy of widespread and systematic use of enforced disappearance, incommunicado detention, torture and other forms of ill treatment against Ukrainian civilian detainees and POWs; demands that Russia notify the Ukrainian Government of the status of all POWs and allow international humanitarian organisations unhindered access; stresses that, under international law, Russia must provide adequate medical care to all Ukrainians in captivity and directly repatriate seriously sick and wounded POWs; urges Russia to release all unlawfully detained civilians without delay;

    4. Demands the immediate release of all Ukrainian civilians held in Russian captivity who do not fall under any category for lawful detention under international humanitarian law, with particular attention to women, children and elderly individuals; underlines that their continued detention places them at imminent risk and constitutes a grave violation of the Geneva Conventions;

    5. Condemns the ongoing persecution of Crimean Tatars in illegally occupied Crimea, including politically motivated detentions, torture, enforced disappearances and restrictions on freedom of religion, expression and association; calls for the immediate release of all Crimean Tatars imprisoned on political grounds and urges the EU and international organisations to enhance monitoring and advocacy on behalf of the indigenous people of Crimea;

    6. Calls for the EU, its Member States and international partners to launch an urgent international campaign aimed at documenting and publicising evidence concerning the imprisonment of Ukrainian minors and elderly civilians in Russian detention, including the use of documented case studies compiled by civil society organisations; stresses the importance of visibility for accountability and rescue operations;

    7. Demands immediate and unhindered access for international humanitarian organisations, including the International Committee of the Red Cross, to all known and suspected sites where Ukrainian civilians are held, with particular attention to women, children and elderly people;

    8. Insists on the immediate release of all Ukrainian journalists held in Russian captivity; calls for the international community to take urgent diplomatic and legal steps to secure their safety and freedom, and to ensure accountability for crimes committed against media professionals in the context of the war;

    9. Strongly condemns the use of punitive psychiatry by the Russian occupying authorities in Ukraine, including the forced institutionalisation of civilians, especially children and individuals with pro-Ukrainian views, in psychiatric hospitals under inhumane and degrading conditions; calls for urgent international monitoring of psychiatric institutions in the temporarily occupied territories of Ukraine and the immediate release of all individuals detained on politically motivated psychiatric grounds;

    10. Insists that all perpetrators, in particular commanders and others within the Russian occupying forces ordering, soliciting or inducing the commission of crimes under international law, are held accountable in accordance with international standards;

    11. Calls for the EU and the broader international community to use all possible judicial and non-judicial accountability mechanisms, including universal jurisdiction, to pressure Russia to immediately cease its campaign of enforced disappearances and torture;

    12. Calls for the EU and the Member States to step up support for Ukraine to enable it to address the widespread mental health and psychosocial needs resulting from the armed conflict, by ensuring access to the relevant services for those returning from captivity, allocating resources to those services and enhancing their institutional coordination, legal regulation, monitoring and evaluation;

    13. Regrets the decision by the Trump administration to cut the funding of the Yale Humanitarian Research Lab and is concerned about the consequent major gap in accountability efforts; welcomes the transfer of the lab’s data to Europol and calls for the EU and the Member States, in cooperation with like-minded partners, to ensure the continuation of the observatory’s work;

    14. Commends the work of the ICC on its ongoing investigation into the situation in Ukraine from 21 November 2013 onwards, encompassing any past and present allegations of war crimes, crimes against humanity or genocide committed on any part of the territory of Ukraine by any person; expresses concern about the worsening attacks on the ICC by the United States, and the impact this will have on the ICC’s ability to continue conducting its investigations; calls on the Commission to urgently activate the blocking statute and on the EU Member States to increase their diplomatic efforts in order to protect and safeguard the ICC as an indispensable cornerstone of the international justice system;

    15. Stresses Europe’s responsibility to curb Russia’s aggression, both in support of Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity and also for the sake of Europe’s own security; calls therefore for the EU and its like-minded partners to increase their efforts to shift the trajectory of Russia’s war against Ukraine and set the conditions for a just, comprehensive and lasting peace; urges the Member States and like-minded partners, therefore, to provide Ukraine with more arms and ammunition to enable Ukraine to liberate its territory and deter further Russian attacks; notes, in this context, that a number of Member States are militarily neutral and urges them to increase their non-military support for Ukraine in line with their constitutions;

    16. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, the governments and parliaments of the Member States, the President, Government and Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, and the President, Government and Parliament of the Russian Federation.

     

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Briefing – CAP simplification package: Omnibus on Agriculture – 02-07-2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Two and a half years since the new rules on the common agricultural policy (CAP) started to apply, the Commission is amending them for the second time. The proposal comes just weeks before the Commission aims to make a separate proposal for the CAP rules that would be in force after 2027. While the first package of amendments, adopted in July 2024 after widespread farmer protests, lowered some of the environmental conditionality requirements and did away with the conditionality controls and penalties for farms under 10 hectares, this current package tackles further stakeholder complaints of overly complex CAP rules and procedures. It aims to offer more flexibility regarding the environmental requirements, greater use of simplified payments for small and medium-sized farms, less bureaucracy for organic farms, simpler procedures for supporting farms affected by climate change and severe weather, and less red tape for the national authorities. After the adoption of the final act, Member States would still need to amend their CAP strategic plans before they can apply the new rules. For the changes to be implemented in 2026, the final act would have to be adopted well before the end of 2025.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Latest news – DNAT meeting – 26 June 2025 – Delegation for relations with the NATO Parliamentary Assembly

    Source: European Parliament

    At the meeting of the Delegation for relations with the NATO Parliamentary Assembly (DNAT) Members elected the following Vice-Chairs: Vasile DÎNCU, First Vice-Chair (S&D, Romania) and Alexandr VONDRA, Second Vice-Chair (ECR, Czechia).

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Situation in Cernăuți (Chernivtsi), Ukraine – E-002545/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002545/2025
    to the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy
    Rule 144
    Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă (NI)

    On Tuesday 17 June 2025, 20 young Ukrainians, some with their faces covered, physically assaulted several Romanian priests in Cernăuți Cathedral. One of the attackers had originally entered the church in a wheelchair, only to participate in the violent attack subsequently. According to reports, Father Pavel Pavlenco, one of the priests, who has eight children, was taken to A&E, while others also suffered serious injuries such as broken ribs, head wounds and kidney damage. The attackers then barricaded themselves in the cathedral and occasioned major damage. After the incident, members of the Romanian community – including priests – gathered peacefully to protest, but they were brutally dispersed, physically assaulted and exposed to tear gas.

    The Priests were assaulted, but Romanians have been discriminated against for years. They are not allowed to speak Romanian or to worship freely, and Romanian Orthodox churches have been shut down.

    Thus far, no official statement has been issued in response to what happened in Cernăuți.

    • 1.What is the Commission’s official stance on this incident?
    • 2.Can events such as this lead to Ukraine’s accession to the EU being put on hold until crimes against minorities, and in particular the Romanian minority, cease and respect for human rights in Ukraine is restored?

    Submitted: 25.6.2025

    Last updated: 2 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – EU funding of Israeli companies involved in the ongoing genocide in Palestine – E-002540/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002540/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Anthony Smith (The Left), Manon Aubry (The Left), Damien Carême (The Left), Marina Mesure (The Left), Arash Saeidi (The Left), Emma Fourreau (The Left), Rima Hassan (The Left), Younous Omarjee (The Left), Leila Chaibi (The Left)

    Last October, we sent the European Commission Question for written answer E-001930/2024/rev.1[1] on support from the Horizon Europe programme for Israeli companies involved in the ongoing genocide in Palestine. In response, the Commission said it was unaware of such practices and reiterated that the funded projects were closely monitored and conditional on respect for human rights in accordance with Article 2 of the EU-Israel Association Agreement.

    However, a recent investigation by journalists[2] has revealed that EUR 42 million from the European Defence Fund, as well as funds from seven other European countries, have been allocated to the ACTUS project. EUR 14 million of this funding were provided to a subsidiary of Israel Aerospace Industries, Israel’s leading defence company, for building drones. This support is in addition to the millions of euros from the Horizon programme dedicated to military research involving Israeli ministries and military companies[3].

    In light of the above:

    • 1.Does the European Commission intend to condemn participation in the genocide in Gaza by Israeli companies receiving EU funds?
    • 2.Does it plan to stop these companies from receiving EU financial support?
    • 3.Will it propose suspending the EU-Israel Association Agreement to the Council, in order to fully respect human rights commitments?

    Submitted: 24.6.2025

    • [1] https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/E-10-2024-001930_EN.html
    • [2] https://disclose.ngo/fr/article/la-france-et-leurope-financent-sans-le-dire-lindustrie-militaire-israelienne.
    • [3] https://www.lecho.be/economie-politique/europe/general/des-fonds-europeens-de-recherche-financent-la-defense-israelienne/10609758.html.
    Last updated: 2 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – 40th anniversary of Schengen – a failed promise of security – E-002528/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002528/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Mary Khan (ESN), Petra Steger (PfE)

    14 June 2025 marked the 40th anniversary of the entry into force of the Schengen Agreement. However, instead of a cause for celebration, this anniversary provides above all an occasion to deliver a sobering assessment: The former promise of secure and control-free internal borders has developed into a serious threat to internal security and public order in view of the ongoing loss of control at the EU’s external borders. Instead of an area of security, freedom and the rule of law, Schengen has become a gateway for people smuggling, organised crime and Islamist terror.

    A functioning Schengen system requires effective external border controls and a clear distinction between legal and illegal migration. In reality, neither of these is guaranteed, which is why Member States are increasingly forced to adopt their own protective measures in the form of internal border controls. However, the Schengen Borders Code allows this only temporarily – a paradoxical scenario, as these measures only become necessary in the first place due to the EU’s failure to fulfil its duties. These circumstances raise fundamental questions about the viability of the Schengen area in the future.

    • 1.What concrete measures is the Commission taking to finally protect the EU’s external borders effectively?
    • 2.Does the Commission recognise that, without a clear distinction between legal and illegal migration, Schengen has been gutted when it comes to security policy?
    • 3.Does the Commission consider it proportionate that Member States are allowed to respond only temporarily to systemic failures on the part of the EU, even though the threat of illegal mass migration is on the rise?

    Submitted: 24.6.2025

    Last updated: 2 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Briefing – A sustainable transport investment plan – 02-07-2025

    Source: European Parliament

    This European Parliamentary Research Service paper aims to inform Members on issues related to a forthcoming Commission initiative. It highlights the main choices that may shape the initiative and which Members may wish to explore ahead of formal European Commission adoption. Based on documentary and other sources, it reflects the information available at the time of writing. For further information on this topic, Members and staff of the European Parliament may contact the author. KEY ISSUES AT STAKE • Transport accounts for around a quarter of EU emissions. More sustainable transport in the EU is therefore crucial to achieving the European Green Deal aim to cut net greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by at least 55 % by 2030, compared to 1990 levels, by means of sustainable fuels, modes, and technological solutions. • Uptake of electric vehicles (EV) in the EU has been slow and uneven, due to limited investment in EV charging infrastructure and EV supply issues. Frontrunners, such as the Netherlands, have a better regulatory environment, greater public investment and a more stable and affordable energy market. Business models and value chains are reluctant to adapt before technological solutions are sufficiently developed. • Implementation of initiatives such as the Alternative Fuels Infrastructure Regulation (AFIR) and CO2 emission standards for new vehicles is challenging, with progress slowing due to uneven roll-out across EU, state, and regional levels, limited electrical grid capacity, and high sustainable fuel production costs. • The European Commission is expected to issue a sustainable transport investment plan in the third quarter of 2025, outlining measures to support the accelerated roll-out of recharging and refuelling infrastructure, as well as dedicated green trade and investment partnerships with third countries on renewable and low-carbon transport fuels.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Continued and substantial violations of the Prespa Agreement – E-002612/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002612/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Nikolaos Anadiotis (NI)

    The recent report of the Committee on Foreign Affairs (AFET), of 24 June 2025,[1] supports the European path of the country with its capital in Skopje, without any reference to the continued and serious violations of the Prespa Agreement.

    The state and political leadership of this country continues ostentatiously and relentlessly – more than 700 instances recorded[2] – to flout the Prespa Agreement in three ways: (a) by systematically using the name ‘Macedonia’ without the intended geographical designation, (b) by maintaining the prominence of the Vergina Sun and (c) by using the term “Macedonian’ in public bodies and organisations, when this is expressly prohibited. These practices constitute not only irregularities but also fundamental violations of the Prespa Agreement, based on Article 60 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties.

    In light of the above:

    • 1.Does the Commission acknowledge that these fundamental violations undermine the purpose and object of the Prespa Agreement?
    • 2.Does the Commission intend to ask the Committee on Foreign Affairs (AFET) to include, in its report, its explicit reservations, as well as the above-mentioned violations by the country in question?
    • 3.Does the Commission intend to reconsider its position on the progress of the accession process?

    Submitted: 27.6.2025

    • [1] https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20250602IPR28709/european-parliament-backs-north-macedonia-s-eu-path-calls-for-bold-reforms
    • [2] https://epitropiellinismou.gr/post/3629
    Last updated: 2 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Climate impact of hydrogen leakage – E-002566/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002566/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Sara Matthieu (Verts/ALE)

    Given the prominent role envisaged for clean hydrogen in the EU’s decarbonisation agenda, questions around its full climate impact must be assessed urgently.

    There is strong scientific consensus that hydrogen’s global warming potential (GWP) is significantly higher than previously reported by the IPCC and referenced in current EU legislation. In addition, recent scientific research, including EU-funded projects and independent campaigns, will provide new evidence such as direct measurement and quantification of hydrogen emissions.

    Article 9(6) of the Gas Market Directive[1] mandates the Commission to submit a report evaluating hydrogen leakage and proposing maximum leakage rates, but it does not specify a publication timeline. Given the rapid pace of hydrogen infrastructure development and the investment decisions being made now, this regulatory gap poses immediate risks to achieving EU climate objectives.

    In light of this:

    • 1.Can the Commission agree that it is both feasible and critically important to submit the report on hydrogen leakage, and if so, what specific steps will the Commission take to ensure it is submitted before 2028?
    • 2.Does the Commission acknowledge the scientific consensus regarding hydrogen’s GWP and will this updated understanding inform upcoming legislative initiatives, including the upcoming delegated act on low-carbon hydrogen?

    Submitted: 25.6.2025

    • [1] Directive (EU) 2024/1788 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 on common rules for the internal markets for renewable gas, natural gas and hydrogen, amending Directive (EU) 2023/1791 and repealing Directive 2009/73/EC (OJ L, 2024/1788, 15.7.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2024/1788/oj).
    Last updated: 2 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Highlights – FISC mission to Dubin (Ireland) – Subcommittee on Tax Matters

    Source: European Parliament

    Members of the FISC Subcommittee will travel to Dublin, Ireland on 22 July for a day of exchanges on tax policies, the fight against tax avoidance and tax simplification.

    The delegation led by FISC Chair Mr Pasquale Tridico will meet with business representatives, including representatives of the Google group, the Meta group and Apple group. They will then have a discussion with Members of the Finance Committee and the Committee for Budgetary Oversight of the Oireachtas. The afternoon will be dedicated to exchanges with tax authorities, NGOs and academics.

    The objectives of the FISC delegation trip to Dublin are to better understand Irish tax policies and to have direct engagements with key policy-makers, tax authorities and stakeholders on critical issues, such as aggressive tax schemes, tax avoidance or tax simplification.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Systemic political repression – Russian hybrid influence undermining democracy in the EU’s Eastern Partnership – E-002502/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002502/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Krzysztof Brejza (PPE)

    On 23 June 2025, a Georgian court sentenced opposition leader Zurab Japaridze to seven months’ imprisonment and imposed a two-year ban on political activity. This follows a concerning trajectory of judicial repression orchestrated by the ruling Georgian Dream party, under the influence of oligarch Bidzina Ivanishvili. Numerous high-profile opposition leaders – including Mikheil Saakashvili, Nika Melia, Nika Gvaramia and Irakli Okruashvili – are currently imprisoned or facing imminent imprisonment under politically motivated charges.

    These developments constitute a systematic dismantling of democratic institutions, in direct violation of Georgia’s obligations under the EU-Georgia Association Agreement, and align with Russian hybrid warfare objectives in the Eastern Partnership region – seeking to erode democratic governance, provoke instability and obstruct Euro-Atlantic integration.

    In this context:

    • 1.What immediate and tangible measures will the Commission adopt to secure the release of Mr Japaridze and other political detainees?
    • 2.What specific political, legal or financial instruments will the Commission activate to impose individualised sanctions on Mr Ivanishvili and affiliated enablers of repression?
    • 3.In view of Georgia’s democratic backsliding, when will the Commission initiate a formal review of the Association Agreement, and under what criteria?

    Submitted: 23.6.2025

    Last updated: 2 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Compatibility of the Barcelona-El Prat Airport expansion with EU environmental law – E-002519/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002519/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Diana Riba i Giner (Verts/ALE)

    The Government of Catalonia has resurrected the plans to extend Barcelona-El Prat Airport. This would directly affect protected natural areas such as La Ricarda and El Remolar, both of which are part of the Natura 2000 network. Independent technical studies warn that the expansion could cause irreversible ecological damage, and would affect dozens of protected species and sensitive habitats.

    A number of measures have been proposed to offset the environmental damage, but many reports argue that they would not be sufficient to prevent fragmentation of the ecosystem or to comply with the obligations laid down in the Habitats and Birds Directives.

    In view of the above:

    • 1.Has the Commission had any communication from the Government of Catalonia regarding the compensatory measures required, or any other consultation or information on this project?
    • 2.Does it believe that an expansion that directly affects Natura 2000 sites can be compatible with EU legislation?
    • 3.If the project goes ahead, what procedure will the Commission follow to assess its compliance with EU law?

    Submitted: 23.6.2025

    Last updated: 2 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Instrumentalisation of migration omitted in the Commission’s proposal on preventing and countering the facilitation of unauthorised entry to the Union – E-002542/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002542/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Mariusz Kamiński (ECR)

    In its proposal for a directive laying down minimum rules to prevent and counter the facilitation of unauthorised entry, transit and stay in the Union[1], the Commission has neglected to address the instrumentalisation of migration.

    I raised this issue by submitting amendments as part of Parliament’s legislative process[2]. I also highlighted several other significant shortcomings of the Commission’s proposal.

    • 1.Why has the Commission neglected to mention the instrumentalisation of migration in its proposal?
    • 2.Is the Commission aware of the amendments put forward by Parliament that remedy significant gaps in the proposal, and does it consider a broader and more substantial approach to the directive’s subject matter to be necessary?

    Submitted: 24.6.2025

    • [1] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52023PC0755
    • [2] https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/LIBE-AM-773119_EN.pdf
    Last updated: 2 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News