Category: Europe

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Briefing – Observers in the European Parliament – 28-04-2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Accession to the European Union is a long process, requiring not only legislative, administrative and economic adaptation to EU standards, but also a degree of adaptation to the working methods of the EU institutions. One of these new working methods candidate countries must navigate is how the European Parliament organises its activities, how members interact, and how to build alliances and dialogue among the various political families represented in Parliament. Parliament’s rules of procedure allow parliamentary representatives of candidate countries to experience all these aspects in person, in advance of accession. Once the accession procedure is nearing conclusion, i.e. once an accession treaty is signed, the parliament of the acceding country may be invited to appoint, from among its members, persons who will be granted observer status to the European Parliament. As they are not yet elected in European elections, these observers remain members of the acceding country’s parliament, but have the opportunity to participate, with some limitations, in parliamentary activities. For example, they cannot vote or fill any elected position within Parliament’s organisation. However, they can participate in the activities of the parliamentary group to which they are affiliated, and attend plenary sittings and committee meetings. Observers were appointed in the last three EU enlargements, and remained in office either until ad hoc European Elections were organised for the acceding country, i.e. outside the official electoral cycle (Croatia, Romania and Bulgaria), or until the end of the parliamentary term (2004 enlargement). The possibility for Ukraine to have observer members in the European Parliament, under the current rules, depends upon the progress on accession negotiations, which officially only opened in December 2023. Nevertheless, cooperation between the Verkhovna Rada, the Ukrainian parliament, and the European Parliament already takes place in other forms.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Briefing – Key challenges faced by LGBTI asylum applicants in the EU – 28-04-2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans-gender and intersex (LGBTI) asylum applicants are recognised as a vulnerable social group under European Union (EU) legislation, and are therefore entitled to international protection. However, it is up to applicants to prove that they are indeed LGBTI, which can be challenging. As they often come from countries where being a member of the LGBTI community exposes individuals to persecution and violence, there is normally little documentary evidence they can produce to support their claims. EU legislation has imposed limits on how Member States can examine and assess LGBTI asylum applications. Whatever methods EU countries use, they are required to respect the human dignity of applicants. LGBTI applicants also have specific needs – for example, in terms of healthcare and safety at reception centres. Vulnerability based on sexual orientation can also play a role in Member States’ decisions on whether an applicant can be sent to their country of origin or to another non-EU country. Although a country might be considered safe as a whole, it might still prove hostile to members of the LGBTI community, which would prevent Member States from being able to send them there. However, more could still be done to better meet the needs of LGBTI asylum applicants. EU legislation requires Member States to set up national independent mechanisms to ensure compliance with LGBTI asylum applicants’ fundamental rights. Organisations such as the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights have also come up with guidance, such as additional training for staff.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: At a Glance – 2025 World Press Freedom Day – 28-04-2025

    Source: European Parliament

    In 1993, the United Nations (UN) General Assembly declared 3 May World Press Freedom Day, acting on a recommendation adopted by UNESCO’s General Conference in 1991. This year will mark the 32nd anniversary of the day, with UNESCO and other international partners organising special events around the world.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Impact of the closure of USAID on Latin America, in particular on the seven million Venezuelan refugees – E-000576/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission has taken note with regret of the announcement by the United States (US) Secretary of State that 83% of all United States Agency for International Development (USAID) assistance programs will be terminated and acknowledges the significant humanitarian and development impact of such decision, particularly in Latin America and the Caribbean, where the presence of USAID has played a significant role in supporting vulnerable populations, including Venezuelan vulnerable refugees and migrants.

    The EU has long been at the forefront of supporting global humanitarian and development efforts and has so far contributed to the organisation of four international conferences[1] in solidarity with Venezuelan vulnerable refugees and migrants and their host countries. The scale and complexity of the current global needs require a collective response.

    While the Commission cannot replace the scale of assistance provided by the US, it remains committed to its engagement and continues to provide support to displaced Venezuelans in several host countries (including in Colombia, Peru, Ecuador, Costa Rica and Mexico) by contributing to socioeconomic integration, access to decent jobs and social protection systems.

    The EU will continue delivering humanitarian assistance to vulnerable people in the region, in a principled manner and on the basis of humanitarian needs.

    The Commission continues to call for an international response to the Venezuelan migration crisis, as it requires shared responsibility. While the US decision generates new challenges, the EU will continue working in a collective approach to uphold its commitments in Latin America and the Caribbean and beyond.

    • [1] https://civil-protection-humanitarian-aid.ec.europa.eu/where/latin-america-and-caribbean/venezuela/2023-international-conference-solidarity-venezuelan-refugees-and-migrants-and-their-host-countries_en
    Last updated: 28 April 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Financial support for Georgian civil society and independent media – E-000508/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The EU has been one of the largest supporters of civil society in Georgia since its independence and remains firmly committed to supporting civil society and independent media in the country.

    Since last summer, the EU has withheld over EUR 120 million worth of bilateral assistance to the Georgian authorities. These funds are currently being redistributed within the Eastern Partnership region based on strategic priorities.

    For Georgia, the Commission tripled its support to civil society organisations (CSOs) and independent media in 2024, i.e. from EUR 5 million originally planned to EUR 15 million.

    This additional funding will come from 2024 allocation as well as reallocation of existing funds and complements the ongoing support for civil society of around EUR 50 million. The Commission is in the process of implementing this support.

    The implementation of financial assistance for civil society and independent media is closely coordinated with Member States and like-minded partners on the ground.

    The Commission will continue to closely monitor and take into account the impact of the latest legislative initiatives on CSOs and independent media. Further support will be made available from 2025-2027 programming funds.

    Last updated: 28 April 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Documents required by financial institutions when entering into contracts with clients – E-000321/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    Article 18 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union prohibits discrimination on grounds of nationality within the scope of application of the Treaties. Sectorial EU legislation may additionally include specific provisions to prevent discrimination.

    In the area of consumer credits, the Consumer Credit Directive[1] obliges Member States to ensure that the conditions for being granted credit do not discriminate against consumers on the grounds of nationality or place of residence.

    Article 15 of the Payment Accounts Directive[2] prohibits banks from discriminating against consumers, on grounds such as nationality or place of residence, as regards access to bank accounts. However, different documents may be required from consumers for compliance with other EU legislation, for instance Anti-Money Laundering (AML) rules.

    The AML Directive[3] requires obliged entities[4] to adopt a risk-based approach, granting discretion on the measures applied to mitigate customer, geographic and other risks.

    Discriminatory practices would however run counter to the spirit of the directive[5]. Should the alleged discrimination result from national transposing measures and their implementation, note that Member States must act within the limits of EU law and comply with general principles of EU law, including non-discrimination[6].

    Regarding telecommunications activities, the European Electronic Communications Code[7], includes a non-discrimination provision for reasons related to end-users’ nationality or place of residence or of establishment[8].

    Customers may consider directing their concerns to national authorities responsible for alternative dispute resolution in financial services, such as FIN-NET[9] members, consumer affairs or telecommunications.

    • [1] OJ L, 2023/2225, 30.10.2023.
    • [2] Directive 2014/92/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 2014 on the comparability of fees related to payment accounts, payment account switching and access to payment accounts with basic features Text with EEA relevance, OJ L 257, 28.8.2014, p. 214-246.
    • [3] OJ L 141, 5.6.2015, p. 73-117.
    • [4] The obliged entities that are subject to Directive (EU) 2015/849 are listed in Article 2 of that directive.
    • [5] Please refer to recitals (65) and (66). Recital (66) emphasises that Member States must ‘ensure that this directive is implemented, as regards risk assessments in the context of customer due diligence, without discrimination’.
    • [6] Judgment of 17 November 2022, SIA ‘Rodl & Partner’, C-562/20, paragraph 49.
    • [7] Directive (EU) 2018/1972 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 establishing the European Electronic Communications Code (Recast), OJ L 321, 17.12.2018, p. 36-214.
    • [8] Article 99 of the European Electronic Communications Code (EECC), states that ‘providers of electronic communications networks or services shall not apply any different requirements or general conditions of access to, or use of, networks or services to end-users, for reasons related to the end-user’s nationality, place of residence or place of establishment, unless such different treatment is objectively justified’. Such ‘objectively justifiable differences in costs and risks’ (as explained in Recital (256) of the EECC) could, for example, be linked to the provision of services at the end-user’s location or refer to a situation where services are denied for reasons of public security.
    • [9] https://finance.ec.europa.eu/consumer-finance-and-payments/retail-financial-services/financial-dispute-resolution-network-fin-net/make-complaint-about-financial-service-provider-another-eea-country_en#what-is-a-financial-services-provider

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Borrowers of loans in Swiss francs – E-000367/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    Directive 93/13/EEC[1] requires Member States to ensure that consumers are not bound by unfair contract terms. I t applies to all contracts on the purchase of goods and services[2] including financial services .

    Under Directive 93 /13/EEC as interpreted by the Court of Justice of the European Union , i t is for Greek authorities and courts to assess, based on the circumstances of each case, whether Greek banks comply with their obligations regarding the fairness and transparency of contract terms such as those exposing the borrower to a foreign exchange risk[3], and draw conclusions in each case .

    In particular, contracts continue to be binding without the unfair terms[4] unless this is impossible under national law. The practical consequences of the invalidity of a mortgage loan contract on account of unfair terms are also governed by national law, provided that it allows to restore the situation which the consumer would have been in without the contract[5].

    Finally, remedies enabling consumers to rely on the unfairness of contract terms must be available under conditions which do not hamper the obtention of the protection sought, including through interim measures[6].

    The Commission does not have powers to intervene in individual consumer disputes, to review decisions of national authorities and courts or to order the suspension of property auctioning.

    Regarding Directive 2014/17/EU[7], it introduced specific rules to protect consumers where the credit is dominated in a foreign currency (e.g. explanations for the implications to consumers, right to convert the credit agreement into an alternative currency).

    The directive only applies to mortgage credit contracts concluded as from March 2016, not offering protection for contracts prior to this date.

    • [1] Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts, OJ L 95, 21.4.1993, p. 29-34.
    • [2] See Section 5 of Commission Notice — Guidance on the interpretation and application of Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts, OJ C 323, 27.9.2019, p. 4-92, COM(2019) 5325 final. However, pursuant to Article 1(2) of Directive 93/13/EEC, the directive does not apply to contract terms that reflect national mandatory statutory provisions, which are applicable independently of the parties’ choice or which are supplementary and apply in the absence of other arrangements between the parties; see for example the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 21 December 2021 in Case C-243 /20 Trapeza Peiraios AE.
    • [3] See for example the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 10 June 2021 in Joined Cases C-776/19 to C-782/19 BNP Paribas Personal Finance SA.
    • [4] Article 6(1) of Directive 93/13/EEC.
    • [5] See for example the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 15 June 2023 in Case C-520/21 Bank M.
    • [6] See for example the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 10 September 2014 in Case C-34/13 Kušionová.
    • [7] Directive 2014/17/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 February 2014 on credit agreements for consumers relating to residential immovable property and amending Directives 2008/48/EC and 2013/36/EU and Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 Text with EEA relevance, OJ L 60, 28.2.2014, p. 34-85.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Risk weights in Italian healthcare bodies – E-000877/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    Ensuring the level playing both inside the single market and vis-à-vis third countries is one of the core tasks of Commission. The approach contained in Article 116 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (Capital Requirements Regulation)[1] is in line with this objective, by granting the same prudential treatment to banks exposures that present equivalent risks.

    To achieve this objective, the Commission cannot disregard the competences — recognised by the Treaties — of Member States in setting-up and delivering their national health systems. These differ significantly in terms of governance and funding arrangements and, accordingly, credit risk profile.

    Given their knowledge of their domestic healthcare bodies and other public sector entities (PSE), national competent authorities are better suited to assess the risks which each PSE poses. As such, they are tasked by the Capital Requirements Regulation with assessing whether exposures to PSEs can be considered as bearing the same risks of exposures to the central government, regional government, or local authority of their respective Member States.

    As noted in the answer to Written Question E-002729/2024[2] from the Honourable Member, the merits of this approach have been confirmed recently by co-legislators when endorsing Regulation (EU) 2024/1623[3], which — to increase transparency of the single-market — tasks the European Banking Authority to establish and update a publicly accessible database of PSEs within the EU which are treated as the central, regional or local government of the Member State in which they are established for the purposes of prudential capital requirements.

    • [1] OJ L 176, 27.6.2013, p. 1-337.
    • [2] https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/E-10-2024-002729-ASW_EN.html
    • [3] Regulation (EU) 2024/1623 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 May 2024 amending Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 as regards requirements for credit risk, credit valuation adjustment risk, operational risk, market risk and the output floor, OJ L, 2024/1623, 19.6.2024.
    Last updated: 28 April 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Highlights – Artificial intelligence at the workplace – Committee on Employment and Social Affairs

    Source: European Parliament

    On Thursday 5 June 2025, EMPL will hold a public hearing on the “Artificial Intelligence at the workplace”. The objective of this hearing is to focus on harnessing the potential and advantages of digital transformation, including algorithmic management and AI in the workplace while at the same addressing the corresponding risks and challenges.

    The hearing is organised as part of the process of collecting expertise for the purpose of the ongoing EMPL legislative own-initiative report on “Digitalisation, artificial intelligence and algorithmic management in the workplace – shaping the future of work”. The experts will share with Committee Members their expertise on issues such as the typologies of algorithmic management and AI systems in the workplace, how they are being integrated in the workplace, and provide an overview of existing legislation, such as the Platform Work Directive.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Transparency and fairness of very large online platform (VLOP) designations under the Digital Services Act – E-000855/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Digital Services Act (DSA) [1] mandates the Commission to designate an online platform or online search engine as a very large online platform (VLOP) or very large search engine (VLOSE) when their number of average monthly active recipients in the EU for the last six months is equal or higher than 45 million,[2] making them subject to additional due diligence obligations.

    As clarified by the Recital 75, this is due to the importance of VLOPs and VLOSEs, given their reach, in facilitating public debate, economic transactions, the dissemination of information, opinions or ideas, and in influencing how recipients obtain and communicate information online.[3]

    VLOPs and VLOSEs may cause societal risks with a different impact than smaller platforms, and it is required from them to bear the highest proportional standard of due diligence obligations.[4]

    The provider may exercise its right to be heard in the process leading up to the designation of its service. As any Commission decision, the designation of a service as a VLOP or VLOSE is subject to judicial review by the Court of Justice of the European Union,[5].

    To tackle the different potential societal and economic risks VLOPs and VLOSEs may pose in view of their extended reach and network effects, the specific obligations applicable to them essentially define a risk-based framework where potential risks specific to their characteristics and features needs to be assessed and corresponding mitigation measures defined and audited. This ensures proportionality of the measures in line with the actual level of risk of the platform and their characteristics.

    Finally, under DSA Article 91[6] the Commission shall evaluate and report[7] on the current process for designation of VLOPs and VLOSEs[8].

    • [1] Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 October 2022 on a Single Market For Digital Services and amending Directive 2000/31/EC (Digital Services Act) (Text with EEA relevance).
    • [2] Article 33(1) and (3) DSA.
    • [3] Recital 75 DSA.
    • [4] Recital 76 DSA.
    • [5] Article 263 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. Currently 6 designations have been challenged in front of the Court of Justice of the European Union.
    • [6] By 17 November 2025.
    • [7] To the European Parliament, the Council and the European Economic and Social Committee.
    • [8] DSA Article 33.
    Last updated: 28 April 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Reconstruction of Gaza in the context of the EU Strategy for the Middle East – E-000745/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The European External Action Service and the Commission are currently carrying out preparatory work for the EU Strategy for the Middle East.

    Given the huge shifts in the region over the last months, and the significant changes still occurring, the EU aims to avoid publishing a strategy which would become rapidly obsolete.

    The EU aims first to finalise work on the New Pact for the Mediterranean, before pushing ahead with the strategy. The High Representative/Vice-President will be working very closely with the Commissioner for the Mediterranean and other members of the College in preparing the strategy.

    The EU welcomed the Gaza Recovery, Reconstruction and Development Plan by the Arab states as a good basis for future cooperation.

    The international community must work with the Palestinians to rebuild the Gaza strip. The EU firmly rejects any proposal to displace Palestinians from Gaza. The EU will work closely with its international partners and key players in the region to build on this initiative.

    In the short-term, the EU’s priority remains a resumption of the ceasefire in Gaza, to allow the release of all the hostages, the restarting of humanitarian aid deliveries at scale to the people of Gaza and a permanent end to hostilities.

    Last updated: 28 April 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – EU disinformation on the murders of Christians and Alawites in Syria – E-001094/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    On 11 March 2025, the High Representative/Vice-President issued a statement[1] on behalf of the EU, which condemned in the strongest terms the horrific crimes committed against civilians, including summary killings, many of which were allegedly perpetrated by armed groups supporting the security forces of the transitional authorities.

    The EU called for a swift, transparent and impartial investigation to ensure that perpetrators are brought to justice. It welcomed the transitional authorities’ commitments, in particular the establishment of an investigative committee.

    It further called on the transitional authorities to allow the Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Syrian Arab Republic to investigate all violations. Everything must be done to prevent any such crimes from happening again.

    The EU calls for an end to violence across Syria and urges all parties to protect Syrians from all ethnic and religious background without discrimination.

    The EU is in contact with the interim authorities and local actors, including civil society, and consistently advocates for an inclusive, peaceful, Syrian-owned and Syrian-led political transition grounded on the respect of international law, human rights, fundamental freedoms, pluralism and tolerance as well as on the values of rule of law and accountability.

    Furthermore, the EU continues to be a staunch supporter of accountability mechanisms working on Syria, including the Impartial and Independent Mechanism, the Commission of Inquiry, and the new Independent Institution on Missing Persons.

    Over the past 13 years, the EU and the Member States have mobilised nearly EUR 37 billion in humanitarian, development, economic and stabilisation assistance, supporting Syrians both inside the country and across the region.

    • [1] Syria: Statement by the High Representative on behalf of the European Union on the recent wave of violence, 11/03/2025. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2025/03/11/syria-statement-by-the-high-representative-on-behalf-of-the-european-union-on-the-recent-wave-of-violence/

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Removal of Panama from the list in the annex to Directive (EU) 2018/843 – E-000815/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission is committed to adopting an updated EU Anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) list of high-risk third countries as soon as possible.

    The Commission welcomes the constructive dialogue with the European Parliament in late January 2025 and is committed to continue this dialogue with Members of the European Parliament on the EU AML list.

    The Commission is dedicated to improving the efficiency of the AML list update process. Following the entry into force of the new Regulation (EU) 2024/1624[1], the Commission will review its methodology for identifying third countries that present risks for the EU’s financial system.

    The current focus remains on optimising the existing process to ensure it remains robust and responsive to evolving global risks. The Commission values ongoing dialogue with the co-legislators to achieve this objective effectively.

    • [1] Regulation (EU) 2024/1624 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 May 2024 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing, OJ L, 2024/1624, 19.6.2024.
    Last updated: 28 April 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Need for a realistic and flexible approach to emissions and mobility regulation in the EU – E-000932/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    Delivering on the EU’s climate targets[1] requires a swift decrease in greenhouse gas emissions from all sectors, including transport. It is also urgent to reduce Europe’s reliance on imported fossil fuels, which makes the EU more vulnerable to external pressure and global market uncertainty — in 2022, the EU’s fossil-fuel energy import bill reached EUR 604 billion.

    The CO2 standards Regulation[2] sets targets for new cars and vans, which get more stringent over time, up to a 100% emission reduction as of 2035.

    This creates long-term predictability for manufacturers and investors, while giving industry the necessary lead-time to adapt. This also supports competitiveness — EU manufacturers are strongly investing in zero-emission technologies and a strong home market is a crucial enabler for them to regain leadership in this area.

    The 2025 CO2 targets, which require a 15% reduction of emissions from baseline, can be met through a mix of technological options, including electric and hybrid vehicles.

    For manufacturers that may not be able to comply on their own , the regulation, as strongly requested by the industry, provides the option to pool with other manufacturers. Pooling is not required under the regulation — it is one option in manufacturers’ compliance strategy.

    As announced in the Industrial Action Plan for the European automotive sector[3], on 1 April 2025 the Commission proposed a targeted amendment of the CO2 standards, whereby compliance would be assessed over the years 2025, 2026 and 2027 combined instead of annually[4].

    This will contribute to safeguarding the EU industry’s capacity to invest, keeping the overall ambition of the 2025 targets. The Commission will also accelerate work on the preparation of the review of the regulation .

    • [1] Enshrined in the European Climate Law — http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2021/1119/oj
    • [2] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2023/851/oj/eng
    • [3] COM(2025) 95 final, 5.3.2025.
    • [4] COM(2025) 136 final, 1.04.2025.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Plan to gradually reduce the EU’s dependence on Russian energy imports – P-000981/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    Following the Russian military aggression against Ukraine as of 2022, the EU has acted firmly to cut its reliance on Russian energy.

    REPowerEU[1], adopted in May 2022, aiming to fast forward the clean transition, diversify supplies, and enhance EU energy resilience. The EU adopted sanctions to phase out Russian coal imports.

    Sanctions on Russian oil have also reduced imports from almost a third to 3% of total EU imports. In terms of gas, the EU reduced its Russian gas imports from over 45% in 2021, to 19% in 2024, replacing it with alternatives like liquefied natural gas from a number of international partners.

    With the end of Russian gas transit via Ukraine, beginning of 2025, the share could fall to 13% this year. However, Russian energy, particularly gas, remains in the EU energy mix.

    To address this, the Commission is working apace on a Roadmap to end Russian energy imports by fully implementing REPowerEU, which is in the Commission Work Programme for 2025.

    • [1] https://commission.europa.eu/publications/key-documents-repowereu_en
    Last updated: 28 April 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – European standards undermining the competitiveness of the European automotive industry – E-000657/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    Delivering on the EU’s net greenhouse gas emissions reduction target of at least 55% by 2030 compared to 1990 and the climate neutrality target by 2050[1] calls for ambitious action to ensure a swift decrease in emissions from all sectors, including transport.

    The revised CO2 standards Regulation[2] sets targets which get more stringent over time, up to a 100% emission reduction for new cars and vans registered in the EU as of 2035.

    This gradual transition towards zero-emission mobility gives industry enough lead-time to develop an adequate compliance strategy.

    The 2025 target requiring a 15% reduction of emissions from the 2021 baseline was agreed by the co-legislators in 2019 and confirmed in 2023. Manufacturers may rely on various technologies to achieve this target, such as zero-emission and hybrid vehicles, or improvements of conventional vehicles.

    For manufacturers that may not be in a position to achieve target compliance on their own, the regulation provides the option to pool with other manufacturers. Pooling is not mandatory, but is one option as part of manufacturers’ compliance strategy.

    As announced in the Industrial Action Plan for the European automotive sector[3], on 1 April 2025 the Commission proposed a targeted amendment of the CO2 emission standards, whereby the compliance would be assessed over the years of 2025, 2026 and 2027 instead of annually[4].

    This will contribute to safeguarding industry’s capacity to invest, keeping the overall ambition of the 2025 targets. The Commission will also accelerate work on the preparation of the review of the regulation.

    • [1] Enshrined in the European Climate Law — http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2021/1119/oj
    • [2] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2023/851/oj/eng
    • [3] COM(2025) 95 final.
    • [4] COM(2025) 136 final, 1.04.2025.
    Last updated: 28 April 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Hearings – Artificial intelligence at the workplace – 05-06-2025 – Committee on Employment and Social Affairs

    Source: European Parliament

    The objective of this hearing is to focus on harnessing the potential and advantages of digital transformation, including algorithmic management and AI in the workplace while at the same addressing the corresponding risks and challenges.

    The experts will present the skills needed for workers to adapt to the digital age and the digital skills gap to enable workers to successfully participate in the labour market as well as to safeguard their fundamental labour rights.The hearing is organised as part of the process of collecting expertise for the purpose of a future Parliament resolution, for which the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs is doing preparatory work, by drafting a report asking the Commission to come up with legislative and possibly other initiative(s) on the topic “Digitalisation, artificial intelligence and algorithmic management in the workplace – shaping the future of work”.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Position on initiatives to restructure the external debt of developing countries and reform special drawing rights (SDRs) – E-001569/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-001569/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Fabio De Masi (NI)

    Does the Commission support global initiatives within the G20 and the IMF[1][2][3] to restructure the external debt of developing countries and reform the system SDRs?

    Submitted: 17.4.2025

    • [1] https://www.t20brasil.org/media/documentos/arquivos/TF03_ST_02_Reallocating_Specia66e19a93d2b08.pdf
    • [2] https://www.uneca.org/stories/transforming-the-global-financial-architecture-new-report-advocates-for-imf-reforms-to
    • [3] https://aercafrica.org/imf-isnt-doing-enough-to-support-africa-billions-could-be-made-available-through-special-drawing-rights/
    Last updated: 28 April 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Briefing – Family reunification rights: Refugees and beneficiaries of subsidiary protection – 28-04-2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Separating family members can have devastating consequences on their wellbeing and ability to rebuild their lives. This is true for everybody, but especially so for people who have fled persecution or serious harm and have lost family during forced displacement and their flight from danger. For beneficiaries of international protection, family separation can affect their ability to engage in many aspects of the integration process, from education and employment to putting down roots, and harm their physical and emotional health. Family reunification is therefore a fundamental aspect of bringing normality to the lives of such people. While European Union law ensures refugees and holders of subsidiary protection – the two types of beneficiaries of international protection – equal treatment in most areas, differences persist regarding family reunification under the Family Reunification Directive, among other things. After 2015, most EU Member States witnessed a significant increase in the number of asylum-seekers arriving in their territory, with a parallel increase in the number of beneficiaries of international protection seeking reunification with their families. To establish some form of control over this unprecedented flow of people, Member States shifted away from awarding refugee status towards granting subsidiary protection, thus restricting the possibility for beneficiaries to reunite with their families. In March 2025, certain EU countries announced restrictions on the right to family reunification for migrants. According to many legal experts, beneficiaries of subsidiary protection face stricter requirements regarding family reunification than refugees, which disregards the particular circumstances related to their forced displacement and the corresponding difficulties they are likely to face in meeting these stricter requirements.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Missions – SANT mission to Kyiv, Ukraine – 14-04-2025 – Committee on Public Health

    Source: European Parliament

    EU Ukraine © Adobe Stock

    Committee on Public Health travelled to Ukraine on 14 and 15 April for talks with parliament representatives and healthcare leaders. The delegation was composed of five Members: Adam Jarubas (EPP, PL), SANT Chair, Tilly Metz (Greens/EFA, LU), SANT Vice-Chair, Vytenis Andriukaitis (S&D, LT), Nikos Papandreou (S&D, EL) and Veronika Cifrová Ostrihoňová (Renew, SK).

    The European Parliament delegation met Chairman Ruslan Stefanchuk, Mykhailo Radutskyi, Chair of the Committee on Public Health, and other members of the Verkhovna Rada, as well as healthcare leaders, including Maryna Slobodnichenko, Deputy Minister of Health. MEPs also witnessed first-hand the impressive care of soldiers injured in the Russian war of aggression.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – 30th anniversary of the enforced disappearance of the 11th Panchen Lama of Tibet – E-001550/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-001550/2025
    to the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy
    Rule 144
    Dainius Žalimas (Renew), Mariusz Kamiński (ECR), Hannes Heide (S&D), Sebastian Tynkkynen (ECR), Bruno Tobback (S&D), Verena Mertens (PPE), Petras Auštrevičius (Renew)

    On the 30th anniversary of the enforced disappearance of the 11th Panchen Lama, we are deeply concerned over his abduction by the Chinese authorities on 17 May 1995. Thirty years on, no information about his whereabouts has been provided. This ongoing disappearance raises serious concerns about the Panchen Lama’s well-being and the safety of other Tibetan Buddhist leaders, including His Holiness the 14th Dalai Lama.

    In light of this, we would like to ask the following questions:

    • 1.Has the EU engaged with China to press for clarification on the whereabouts of the 11th Panchen Lama, and what outcomes have been achieved?
    • 2.Does the VP/HR plan to bring up the enforced disappearance of the 11th Panchen Lama during the upcoming EU-China strategic dialogue, and what concrete actions are being pursued to ensure accountability for his abduction and the broader violation of religious freedoms in Tibet?
    • 3.The Chinese Government has expressed its intention to interfere in the reincarnation of the Dalai Lama, disregarding Tibetan traditions and violating religious freedom. In response, the United States introduced the Tibet Policy and Support Act of 2019, affirming that only the Tibetan Buddhist community can decide on the Dalai Lama’s succession. What is the EU’s position on this issue?

    Submitted: 16.4.2025

    Last updated: 28 April 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Fisheries – a priority at the EU-UK summit on 19 May 2025 – P-001609/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Priority question for written answer  P-001609/2025/rev.1
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Wouter Beke (PPE)

    Fisheries is a fundamental theme of the Trade and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and the United Kingdom. The agreement establishes a detailed framework for reciprocal access to maritime resources. There is a transitional period from 2021 to 2026, during which both parties have full access to each other’s exclusive economic zone and, for specific fish stocks, partial access to the six to twelve nautical miles zone. As part of Brexit arrangements, the EU had to accept a transfer of 25% of EU quotas for that period. As from 2026, access to UK waters is to be determined through annual negotiations on a renewed level and under new conditions. This is creating considerable uncertainty for the fishing industry in Belgium, among other countries, which is highly dependent on access to UK waters – over 50% for all fish species and up to 70% for sole, which, last year, accounted for 44% of value creation by the fleet.

    Does the Commission regard fisheries as a priority on the negotiating agenda for the EU-UK summit on 19 May 2025?

    Submitted: 23.4.2025

    Last updated: 28 April 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Socio-economic and environmental impacts of Regulation (EU) 2023/1115 on the European leather supply chain – E-001517/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-001517/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Salvatore De Meo (PPE), Letizia Moratti (PPE), Massimiliano Salini (PPE), Flavio Tosi (PPE), Christine Schneider (PPE), Elena Donazzan (ECR), Francesco Torselli (ECR), Sebastian Tynkkynen (ECR), Mariateresa Vivaldini (ECR), Tomáš Kubín (PfE), Petr Bystron (ESN), Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă (NI)

    Considering that:

    • Regulation (EU) 2023/1115[1] on deforestation-free products (the EU Deforestation Regulation – EUDR) also requires tanneries to trace skins from the birth of the animal in order to demonstrate the absence of links with deforestation;

    • Skin is a by-product (Regulation (EC) 1069/2009[2]), waste that occurs from the slaughtering of cattle, representing only 1-2 % of the animal, and does not affect livestock breeding dynamics or deforestation phenomena;

    • Tanneries recover this waste, and that limiting such activity as a consequence of the EUDR’s application would have negative environmental effects, as the skins would have to be disposed of as waste and replaced with more polluting synthetic materials;

    • Under the rules of the EUDR, European tanneries, importing from 177 countries worldwide, will face the objectively impossible task of retrieving traceability data, thereby jeopardising their competitiveness and favouring non-EU producers, such as those in China, who are not subject to equivalent constraints;

    • The EUDR does not cover finished leather products (e.g., shoes), allowing for the entry into the EU of items tanned elsewhere, and thereby distorting competition.

    We ask the Commission:

    • 1.When will the impact assessment, pursuant to Article 34(3) of the EUDR, be available, and does the Commission intend to exclude leather from Annex I?
    • 2.Does the Commission nevertheless plan to simplify the EUDR?

    Supporter[3]

    Submitted: 11.4.2025

    • [1] Regulation (EU) 2023/1115 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 May 2023 on the making available on the Union market and the export from the Union of certain commodities and products associated with deforestation and forest degradation and repealing Regulation (EU) No 995/2010 (OJ L 150, 9.6.2023, p. 206, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2023/1115/oj).
    • [2] Regulation (EC) No 1069/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 laying down health rules as regards animal by-products and derived products not intended for human consumption and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 (Animal by-products Regulation) (OJ L 300, 14.11.2009, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2009/1069/oj).
    • [3] This question is supported by a Member other than the authors: Fernand Kartheiser (ECR)

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Unidentified anomalous phenomena (UAP) in the EU Space Law and detection capabilities – E-001572/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-001572/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Fabio De Masi (NI)

    In 2023, the Commission – on behalf of President von der Leyen and Commissioner Gabriel – acknowledged the importance of enhancing detection capabilities for objects in the near-Earth space environment, partly to better identify UAP[1].

    Can the Commission clarify how it intends to honour its previously stated intention to enhance UAP detection capabilities in the space domain, and explain why no reference to UAP has been included in the ongoing development of the EU Space Law?

    Submitted: 17.4.2025

    • [1] https://www.asktheeu.org/request/ufouapuctunknown_unidentified_cr_3/response/48762/attach/5/UFO%20UAP%20EC%20reply.pdf?cookie_passthrough=1
    Last updated: 28 April 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Exclusion of the ceramics sector from cost offsets under the Emissions Trading System (ETS) and the single market distortions caused by the allocation of free allowances – E-001557/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-001557/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Roberto Vannacci (PfE)

    The Italian[1] and European ceramics sectors are very energy-intensive and do not currently have technologically and economically feasible alternatives to natural gas.

    Exports alone account for 82 % of the total turnover of the Italian ceramics industry, exposing this sector to competition from non-EU countries that have less restrictive environment- and climate-related regulations.

    The current Emissions Trading System does not reflect the ceramic tile production process as a whole, as it allocates free allowances to this sector on the basis of just one product benchmark (‘spray-dried powders’). This state of affairs penalises plants which manufacture these powders themselves as it compels them to buy additional emission allowances, thereby driving up their costs and putting them at a disadvantage vis-a-vis third country exporters. Furthermore, the ETS does not account for energy that is generated by means of combined heat and power (CHP) systems, which are more efficient and produce fewer emissions.

    While the Commission has determined that sectors like steel, paper and aluminium[2] can benefit from carbon emission (‘carbon leakage’) cost offsets, the ceramics industry has been excluded from this arrangement even though it has a high trade intensity (in excess of 40 %) and a carbon leakage indicator above the 0.2 threshold set by Directive 2003/87/EC.

    In the light of the above:

    • 1.Will the Commission revise the free allowance allocation system by taking the entire ceramics production cycle into account along with energy-efficient technologies like CHP systems?
    • 2.Given the evolution of energy prices, will the Commission limit itself to applying the criteria laid down by Directive 2003/87/EC, thus allowing the ceramics sector to benefit from carbon emission cost offsets?

    Submitted: 16.4.2025

    • [1] https://confindustriaceramica.it/w/riformare-il-sistema-ets.
    • [2] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/IT/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52020XC0925%2801%29.
    Last updated: 28 April 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Dangerous landslides in Gortynia – E-001461/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-001461/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Kostas Papadakis (NI)

    Recurrent landslides are persistently and increasingly causing problems on the national road between Tripoli and Pyrgos. Due to landslides on the deathtrap that is the EO74, the region of Gortynia has been cut in two, leaving local residents unable to carry out even the simplest of everyday tasks. There are issues with the general road infrastructure, as the byroads serve a large volume of traffic, given the equally unacceptable condition of the lakeside road connecting the areas of Tropaia and Kontovazaina with the national road between Patras and Tripoli (111), as well as of the road between Loutra and Dimitsana, which cannot cope with the demands of large vehicle traffic. What is worse, the transfer of patients from the Tropaia health centre is being hindered.

    This unacceptable situation is one of many examples of the repercussions of the cost-benefit policy followed by the EU, the Nea Dimokratia Government and all the previous ones, since this road is ‘ineligible’ for funding due to the ‘cost-benefit analysis’.

    In view of the above, can the Commission answer the following:

    • 1.What view does it take of the urgent request from the inhabitants of Arkadia and their collective associations for immediate funding and for the implementation of the essential project concerning the stretch of the Tripoli-Pyrgos national road between Vytina and Archaia Olympia with a bypass of Lagkadia?
    • 2.What view does it take of the fact that cost-benefit policies of the EU and national governments leave roads that are critical for the lives and everyday activities of local residents unmaintained, incomplete and, ultimately, posing a risk to their lives and safety?

    Submitted: 9.4.2025

    Last updated: 28 April 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Privacy risks arising from the integration of AI on Meta’s digital platforms – E-001546/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-001546/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Fulvio Martusciello (PPE)

    La Repubblica reports that the automatic embedding of Meta’s new virtual assistant (Meta AI) into the Whatsapp, Facebook, Instagram and Messenger accounts of all EU citizens has raised privacy and security concerns among users, who complain that they have no control over Meta AI and that it was integrated without their consent.

    Though users are not obliged to use Meta’s chatbot, it still constitutes a threat to them as it cannot be uninstalled. Users of Whatsapp’s business application also have to contend with privacy issues, seeing that Meta has refused to guarantee that their interactions with Meta AI will not be used to develop algorithms.

    In view of the above:

    • 1.Will the Commission verify that Meta AI complies with the EU rules laid down by the GDPR and the Digital Services Act?
    • 2.Does the Commission agree that it should launch an inquiry into Meta AI establishing the potential risks, vulnerabilities and issues for Meta users, particularly minors?
    • 3.Does the Commission agree that it will have to intercede on the users’ behalf to ensure that they have a choice in the matter?

    Submitted: 16.4.2025

    Last updated: 28 April 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – EU dependence on critical raw materials and impact on European industry – E-000995/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    1. The Critical Raw Materials Act[1], which entered into force in May 2024, is the main framework to stimulate extraction, processing and recycling of critical raw materials in the EU. It allows the Commission to identify and support strategic projects linked to extraction, processing and recycling of strategic raw materials. Such projects will help develop European value chains and reduce EU dependencies. The Commission adopted a first Decision listing 47 strategic projects in the EU on 25 March 2025[2].

    2. Among the selected strategic projects, three are in Romania and concern the extraction of copper, graphite and magnesium. These strategic projects will benefit from a pre-set permitting timeline of 27 months maximum as well as coordinated support for access to finance and to industrial off takers.

    3. The Critical Raw Materials Act is the main framework to create an integrated European supply chains industry. It is complemented by other initiatives, such as the Net Zero Industry Act[3], the Chips Act[4] and the Automotive Action Plan[5] for other segments of the value chain. These initiatives contribute to the strengthening of European supply chains, the reduction of strategic dependencies and the promotion of EU industrial competitiveness.

    • [1] Regulation (EU) 2024/1252 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 April 2024 establishing a framework for ensuring a secure and sustainable supply of critical raw materials and amending Regulations (EU) No 168/2013, (EU) 2018/858, (EU) 2018/1724 and (EU) 2019/1020 (Text with EEA relevance).
    • [2] https://single-market-economy.ec.europa.eu/sectors/raw-materials/areas-specific-interest/critical-raw-materials/strategic-projects-under-crma/selected-projects_en
    • [3] Regulation (EU) 2024/1735 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 on establishing a framework of measures for strengthening Europe’s net-zero technology manufacturing ecosystem and amending Regulation (EU) 2018/1724 (Text with EEA relevance).
    • [4] Regulation (EU) 2023/1781 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 September 2023 establishing a framework of measures for strengthening Europe’s semiconductor ecosystem and amending Regulation (EU) 2021/694 (Chips Act) (Text with EEA relevance).
    • [5] Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions Industrial Action Plan for the European automotive sector https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:52025DC0095
    Last updated: 28 April 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Conspicuous activity at the FRA Agency – E-002779/2024(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    In accordance with Article 16(1) of its Founding Regulation[1], the EU Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) shall fulfil its tasks in complete independence.

    The implementation of the Agency’s budget falls under the responsibility of its Director, in line with Articles 15(4)(e) and 21 of its Founding Regulation. The Commission is not aware of the specific costs of the training the Honourable Members refer to.

    In 2022, the Commission published a Eurobarometer survey, which showed that, on average across the EU, 68% of respondents tended to overestimate the real share of immigrants in the population[2].

    The Commission is committed to improving people’s understanding of migration and integration based on facts and data. The current EU Action plan on integration and inclusion[3] aims, among other things, at helping more Europeans to be well informed on integration and migration.

    It also underlines that working with media representatives, education institutions as well as civil society organisations is key to better inform Europeans about the realities of migration and integration.

    • [1] Council Regulation (EC) No 168/2007 of 15 February 2007 establishing a European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights, OJ L 53, 22.2.2007, p. 1.
    • [2] https://migrant-integration.ec.europa.eu/library-document/special-eurobarometer-integration-immigrants-european-union_en
    • [3] https://home-affairs.ec.europa.eu/policies/migration-and-asylum/legal-migration-resettlement-and-integration/integration/action-plan-integration-and-inclusion_en
    Last updated: 28 April 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Digital education: tackling cyberbullying by supporting schools and young people, particularly those living with disabilities – E-000859/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission is committed to the highest standard of protection and empowerment of children offline and online. Bullying is addressed through research, tools and training to support and guide policymakers, school leaders, teachers and educators.

    The Commission fosters mutual learning among national policymakers, civil society and social partners through the Working Group on Equality and Values in Education and Training[1], including on topics such as bullying.

    The Commission is preparing an Action Plan to combat the growing trend of cyberbullying, leveraging on the current legal, policy and funding measures which will be adopted in the first half of 2025.

    Cyberbullying will also be addressed under the Guidelines on Art. 28 of the Digital Services Act (DSA)[2] in the summer of 2025. The Commission will also launch the first-ever EU-wide inquiry on the impact of social media on the well-being and mental health of young people in the second half of 2025.

    In parallel, under the Better Internet Kids (BIK+)[3] strategy, the co-funded network of Safer Internet Centres, with the EU-funded BIK platform[4], develops campaigns and provides assistance on cyberbullying for children, parents and teachers in Member States. One example is the French helpline 3018[5].

    Moreover, the Digital Education Action Plan (2021-2027)[6] aims to ensure that all learners, including those with disabilities, have the digital literacy skills to safely engage with online content and to recognise risks and can make informed, safe and respectful choices when online.

    The Commission published Guidelines for teachers and educators on tackling disinformation and promoting digital literacy through education and training in 2022[7].

    Lastly, the Commission’s digital education agenda is supported through Erasmus+[8] and the European Solidarity Corps[9] programmes.

    • [1] https://education.ec.europa.eu/about-eea/working-groups
    • [2] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32022R2065
    • [3]  COM/2022/212 final.
    • [4] https://www.betterInternetforkids.eu
    • [5] https://e-enfance.org/le3018/
    • [6] https://education.ec.europa.eu/focus-topics/digital-education/action-plan
    • [7] https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/a224c235-4843-11ed-92ed-01aa75ed71a1/language-en
    • [8] https://erasmus-plus.ec.europa.eu/
    • [9] https://youth.europa.eu/solidarity_en

    MIL OSI Europe News