Category: Europe

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Need to recognise the genocide of Christians in the East (Greeks, Armenians and Assyrians) – E-002834/2024(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    Remembrance policies are under the competence of Member States.

    Reconciliation is a core foundation of the European project. Good neighbourly relations and reconciliation are also essential elements of the EU’s enlargement policy.

    It is fundamental that partner countries are able to face their past through open and serene debates. In this context, the Commission encourages meaningful dialogue between Türkiye and its neighbours paving the way towards full reconciliation.

    Good neighbourly relations form an integral part of Türkiye ’s process of moving towards the EU. As stressed in the Commission’s 2024 Report on Türkiye[1], the country is expected to unequivocally commit to good neighbourly relations, international agreements and the peaceful settlement of disputes.

    • [1] https://enlargement.ec.europa.eu/document/download/8010c4db-6ef8-4c85-aa06-814408921c89_en?filename=T%C3%BCrkiye%20Report%202024.pdf
    Last updated: 22 April 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Bernard-Henri Lévy/ARTE case – measures to prevent conflicts of interest in Europe’s public audiovisual sector – E-000734/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    As this is an ongoing investigation, the Commission is unable to comment on the specific case referred to by the Honourable Member.

    Regarding the first question, the Commission allocates funding to media-related projects through various programmes and funding lines, particularly under the Creative Europe programme, the multimedia actions and pilot projects and preparatory actions (PPPA). In calls focusing on news media, applicants must submit a declaration on editorial standards and independence.

    Under Creative Europe[1], all calls require compliance with the highest ethical standards. Each grant agreement includes clauses addressing conflicts of interest, obligating beneficiaries to prevent any situations that could compromise impartiality.

    Non-compliance may result in a reduction or termination of the grant. In the context of multimedia and news-related PPPA, specific rules concerning quality standards and ethics are outlined in an annex attached to each grant agreement.

    As for the second question, the Commission has not received specific information from the French or German authorities.

    Nonetheless, the Commission is in regular contact with all Member States in the context of the European Media Freedom Act (EMFA)[2] application, starting from 8 August 2025.

    The Commission is monitoring how Member States are ensuring compliance with EMFA requirements that are related to the prevention of conflicts of interest and the independent management of publicly funded media.

    • [1] Regulation (EU) 2021/818 establishing the creative Europe programme (2021 to 2027) https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32021R0818
    • [2] Regulation (EU) 2024/1083 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 April 2024 establishing a common framework for media services in the internal market and amending Directive 2010/13/EU.
    Last updated: 22 April 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Türkiye’s purchase of Eurofighter Typhoon jets jeopardises Europe’s external security – E-002775/2024(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The EU is fully committed to a comprehensive settlement of the Cyprus problem, within the United Nations agreed framework, in accordance with all relevant United Nations (UN) Security Council resolutions and in line with the principles on which the EU is founded and the acquis. It remains crucial that Türkiye commits and actively contributes to such a peaceful settlement, including its external aspects.

    The EU attaches particular importance to resumption of and progress in the Cyprus settlement talks in further enhancing EU-Türkiye cooperation[1].

    Welcoming the recent steps taken by the UN Secretary-General towards a resumption of settlement talks, the EU remains ready to play an active role in supporting all stages of the UN-led process, with all appropriate means at its disposal[2].

    The control on the export of arms by Member States is subject, inter alia[3], to the Council Common Position 2008/944/CFSP[4]. Under its Article 2(5)(b), when assessing export licence applications, they shall take into account the risk of use of the items against forces of other Member States.

    In line with EU’s Strategic Compass for Security and Defence and the Joint Communication on the State of play of EU-Türkiye political, economic and trade relations of November 2023[5], the High Representative/Vice-President remains committed to developing a mutually beneficial partnership with Ankara.

    This requires equal commitment on Türkiye’s side to advance on a path of cooperation, sustained de-escalation and to address EU concerns.

    • [1] https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/m5jlwe0p/euco-conclusions-20240417-18-en.pdf
    • [2] https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-16983-2024-INIT/en/pdf
    • [3] This includes also national legislation and the Arms Trade Treaty, https://thearmstradetreaty.org/hyper-images/file/ATT_English/ATT_English.pdf?templateId=137253
    • [4] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32008E0944
    • [5] https://enlargement.ec.europa.eu/joint-communication-european-council-state-play-eu-turkiye-political-economic-and-trade-relations-0_en
    Last updated: 22 April 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Planned return hubs – E-000603/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The legislative proposal for a regulation establishing a common system for the return of third-country nationals staying illegally in the Union[1], adopted by the Commission on 11 March 2025, introduces the possibility to return illegally staying third-country nationals to a ‘return hub’ (Article 17 of the proposal) . Legislative negotiations on this proposal are ongoing. The Commission has not held discussions with third countries on return hubs.

    • [1] Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a common system for the return of third-country nationals staying illegally in the Union, and repealing Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and the Council, Council Directive 2001/40/EC and Council Decision 2004/191/EC, COM/2025/101 final.
    Last updated: 22 April 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Harmonisation of cargo securing regulations – E-000565/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission is aware that different practices exist in Member States as regards the inspection of cargo securing, which is linked to the fact that directive 2014/47/EU[1] does not make such inspections mandatory.

    Nonetheless, Annex III of the directive sets out the principles of cargo securing, including relevant standards, and common rules on the inspection of cargo securing (including the classification and assessment of deficiencies), if such checks are applied.

    Inadequate securing of cargo sometimes leads to serious accidents, hence, when detected, such deficiencies must be corrected, which may involve the temporary restriction or prohibition of the use of the vehicle (cf. Article 14 of the directive). Such restrictions appear thus to be justified based on the overriding public interest of road safety.

    The Commission has considered the effects of diverging national practices in the impact assessment that will accompany the proposal for the revision of the directive. The Commission proposal is expected to be adopted in the coming weeks.

    Certain generally applicable physical formulae are already referred to in Annex III of the directive as well as in the 2014 best practices guidelines on cargo securing for road transport[2].

    The various standards listed in Annex III of the directive and in the best practice guidelines relate to different aspects of cargo securing, such as the calculation of lashing forces, lashing points, various forms of securing the cargo, as well as transport packaging etc.

    • [1] Directive 2014/47/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 April 2014 on the technical roadside inspection of the roadworthiness of commercial vehicles circulating in the Union and repealing Directive 2000/30/EC, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2014/47/2022-09-27
    • [2] European Commission: Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport, Cargo securing for road transport — 2014 European best practices guidelines, Publications Office, 2014, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2832/80373
    Last updated: 22 April 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Hate speech and threats against Armenia by the President of Azerbaijan – E-000527/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The EU continues to support the normalisation of relations between Armenia and Azerbaijan and stands ready to support the parties in their dialogue aimed at achieving lasting and sustainable peace.

    For this dialogue to be effective, both sides need to desist from hostile or inflammatory rhetoric, and act in respect of the principles of sovereignty, territorial integrity, and the inviolability of borders.

    The EU has consistently passed this message in the contacts with the Azerbaijani authorities. The EU is ready to mobilise substantial additional support and investments to allow the parties to reap the benefits of peace, including in the areas of connectivity and infrastructure.

    Last updated: 22 April 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Unfair competition from voluntary associations in tenders – E-000043/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    As a general principle, public procurement procedures are open to all legal or natural persons willing to provide services, works or supplies.

    All bidders must be treated equally, regardless of their characteristics, including legal form, statutory goals, way of functioning or financing, and the use of voluntary staff.

    Furthermore, EU public procurement rules allow public buyers to limit participation in a tender procedure to non-profit organisations only (CPV 85143000-3 Ambulance services)[1].

    In the cases referred to, the public buyers involved did not decide to use this possibility.

    • [1] Article 77 of Directive 2014/24 on public procurement.
    Last updated: 22 April 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Arctic-boreal zone emissions – E-000644/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    1. The Commission supports Member States and third countries including through grants under the Union Civil Protection Mechanism (UCPM)[1]. Beneficiaries from Nordic countries are involved in wildfire-related projects to enhance cross-border cooperation, promote resilience, and enhance research and readiness for extreme wildfires. F irefighting preparedness is being reinforced since 2019 with an aircraft of the rescEU fleet positioned in Sweden. The Commission also supports institutional capacity building through the UCPM peer review programme[2] and the Commission’s Expert Group on Forest Fires[3], which facilitates the exchange of good practices among the fire management services of European countries.

    2. The EU has invested EUR 372 million in 139 Horizon 2020 and Horizon Europe[4] research projects covering the Arctic region. In line with the EU Arctic policy, research on permafrost thawing and informing climate mitigation strategies will continue in Horizon Europe. As of January 2025, the European Polar Coordination Office (EPCO) provides expert input to inform decisions on polar priorities and challenges. In 2024, a Commission Task Force issued a report on polar observations[5], including recommendations for permafrost and methane emissions monitoring.

    3. The EU’s Arctic Policy[6] and EU Green Alliances with Norway and Canada underline the EU’s fundamental interest in supporting multilateral Arctic cooperation. The EU promotes strong cooperation to address climate issues in the Arctic and boreal context and regularly engages with the Arctic Council and funds its research activities. It contributes to climate efforts in multilateral fora such as the International Maritime Organisation and the United Nation’s Climate Change Conferences.

    • [1] https://civil-protection-humanitarian-aid.ec.europa.eu/what/civil-protection/eu-civil-protection-mechanism_en
    • [2] https://civil-protection-knowledge-network.europa.eu/disaster-prevention-and-risk-management/ucpm-peer-review-programme
    • [3] https://ec.europa.eu/transparency/expert-groups-register/screen/expert-groups/consult?lang=en&do=groupDetail.groupDetail&groupID=416
    • [4] https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/funding/funding-opportunities/funding-programmes-and-open-calls/horizon-europe_en
    • [5] https://joint-research-centre.ec.europa.eu/jrc-news-and-updates/copernicus-polar-roadmap-eu-satellite-observations-help-respond-emerging-polar-challenges-2024-09-03_en?prefLang=bg
    • [6] JOIN (2021)27 final.
    Last updated: 22 April 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Monitoring of EPOCH platform activities – E-001470/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-001470/2025/rev.1
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Olivier Chastel (Renew)

    Launched in 2021 in the wake of the Lisbon Declaration, the European Platform on Combatting Homelessness (EPOCH) aims chiefly to promote mutual learning on homelessness policies, strategies and action plans at national, regional and local level, with a particular focus on a housing-led approach and improving analytical data on homelessness.

    Three years on from the platform’s official launch,

    what results have been achieved thus far (number of specific projects funded, outcomes obtained in the field, activities organised) and what are the next steps planned by the Commission to ensure that the target of 2030 is met?

    Submitted: 9.4.2025

    Last updated: 22 April 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Possibilities of strengthening data security within public procurement regulation – E-001462/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-001462/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Morten Løkkegaard (Renew)

    In a rapidly changing world, it is paramount that we do not treat our data security lightly, as we risk exposing our citizens and societies to data-driven threats and surveillance from malign actors. Therefore, we need to strengthen the awareness and legislative framework in this regard, especially concerning the public procurement of data-heavy products such as electric vehicles, drones and the like. Can the Commission, in this regard:

    • 1.Confirm that using ‘data security’ as a procurement criterion on a par with economic and environmental criteria is permitted within the current Public Procurement Directive?
    • 2.Outline what proposals the Commission envisages to put forward to further strengthen data security with the forthcoming revision of the Public Procurement Directive?
    • 3.Outline any further proposals the Commission plans to put forward, in order to strengthen the data security of citizens and societies alike?

    Submitted: 9.4.2025

    Last updated: 22 April 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – EU support for Spanish regions overwhelmed by high migratory pressure – E-001238/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-001238/2025/rev.1
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Tomas Tobé (PPE), Lena Düpont (PPE)

    The migratory pressure on Spain remains high and several regions are reportedly overwhelmed[1]. Last year, the Canary Islands saw an 18 % increase in arrivals to almost 47 000, the highest figure since Frontex began collecting data[2]. The Canary Islands received 73.22 % of the total irregular arrivals to Spain[3]. Furthermore, nearly 6 000 migrants arrived in the Balearic Islands during 2024, almost three times the number compared with the previous year[4]. The situation is alarming, with several regions lacking the necessary support from the national government to properly manage it.

    In September last year, it was reported that Frontex stood ready to offer support to Spain in managing the situation in the Canary Islands, should the government request it. However, it is not clear what the current situation is with regard to the several regions in Spain facing record levels of migratory pressure.

    • 1.What is needed to step up EU support for these regions and which specific EU measures could be considered?
    • 2.Which specific measures require a prior request from Spanish authorities?

    Submitted: 25.3.2025

    • [1] https://www.infomigrants.net/en/post/62050/spain-more-migrant-arrivals-regions-overwhelmed.
    • [2] https://www.frontex.europa.eu/media-centre/news/news-release/irregular-border-crossings-into-eu-drop-sharply-in-2024-oqpweX.
    • [3] https://www.rtve.es/noticias/20250102/2024-roza-record-llegadas-irregulares-63970-migrantes-ano/16393412.shtml.
    • [4] https://www.infomigrants.net/en/post/62050/spain-more-migrant-arrivals-regions-overwhelmed#:~:text=Nearly%206%2C000%20migrants%20arrived%20in,compared%20with%202%2C278.
    Last updated: 22 April 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Highlights – Energy Community Parliamentary Plenum – Committee on Industry, Research and Energy

    Source: European Parliament

    On 24 April, the ITRE Committee will host the Energy Community Parliamentary Plenum.

    The Energy Community brings together the European Union and its neighbouring countries (Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo, North Macedonia, Georgia, Moldova, Montenegro, Serbia and Ukraine) to create an integrated pan-European energy market. The aim of the Plenum is to ensure a dialogue between the parliaments of those countries and the European Parliament in order to solidify a parliamentary dimension in the Energy Community process.

    This year’s Plenum will focus on electricity affordability and integration of renewables.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Highlights – INTA to vote on CBAM opinion – Committee on International Trade

    Source: European Parliament

    At an extraordinary meeting taking place on Wednesday 23 April at 9:30, INTA Members will vote on the opinion to the ENVI committee on the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism simplification proposal.

    INTA Coordinators decided to apply the simplified procedure with amendments (Rule 52(2)) on 19 March for the adoption of this opinion. The deadline for amendments was set on 3 April at 12:00 and 8 amendments were tabled. INTA had to convene this extraordinary session to meet ENVI’s deadline for the adoption of the report.

    A presentation of the CBAM proposal was held during the INTA meeting of 7 April. INTA rapporteur for the opinion is Karin Karlsbro (Renew).

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Bloody Sunday: massacres in Ukraine and Gaza – P-001544/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Priority question for written answer  P-001544/2025
    to the Council
    Rule 144
    Cecilia Strada (S&D), Camilla Laureti (S&D), Annalisa Corrado (S&D), Sandro Ruotolo (S&D), Giuseppe Lupo (S&D), Marco Tarquinio (S&D), Alessandra Moretti (S&D), Pierfrancesco Maran (S&D)

    On Palm Sunday (13 April 2025), around 30 people, including children, were killed and more than 100 injured by a despicable Russian missile strike that used cluster munitions, which have rightly been condemned as contrary to any fundamental human principle.

    On the same day, having given an evacuation order just twenty minutes before the attack, Israel bombed the Christian Al-Ahli Hospital, putting the last functional medical facility in Gaza City out of use and also killing three people, including a child.

    Both massacres show complete disregard for the principles of international humanitarian law and are part of a series of violations of human rights and human dignity which should constitute a line in the sand for EU action on the international stage, as established in Article 21 TEU, the consistency of which is a prerogative of the Council, among others.

    In the light of these atrocities:

    • 1.Will the Council condemn the use of cluster munitions and any attempt to justify their production, use and deployment as a military deterrent?
    • 2.Will it block the proposal for a decision on the position to be taken on behalf of the EU in the EU-Israel Association Council on the extension of the EU-Israel Action Plan for a further two years?

    Supporters[1]

    Submitted: 15.4.2025

    • [1] This question is supported by Members other than the authors: Dario Nardella (S&D), Brando Benifei (S&D), Alessandro Zan (S&D)
    Last updated: 22 April 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: Asia Cultural Co-operation Forum+ 2025 promotes cultural co-operation

    Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

    Asia Cultural Co-operation Forum+ 2025 promotes cultural co-operation 
    The theme of the Forum is “Connect, Create, Engage: Bridging Cultures for All”. Officiating at the Panel opening today, the Secretary for Culture, Sports and Tourism, Miss Rosanna Law, highlighted that the world has undergone rapid and vigourous changes and technological advancement is something inevitable. A people-oriented approach should be adopted to promote the arts and cultural development, i.e. to connect more with people, to create more for people and to engage more people. Making good use of Hong Kong as an East meets-West centre for international cultural exchange and the largest art trading centre in Asia, Hong Kong will surely continue to work hard to make our name card more shiny and tell good stories of Hong Kong.
     
    In addition to the speeches given by Miss Law and Vice Minister of Culture and Tourism, Mr Gao Zheng in the Panel, participating cultural ministers and senior officials from Bahrain, Bangladesh, Brunei, Cambodia, Georgia, Iran, Kazakhstan, Korea, Laos, Nepal, Pakistan, Singapore, Slovak Republic, Thailand, United Arab Emirates and Vietnam also took turns to speak.

    The Acting Chief Executive, Mr Chan Kwok-ki, hosted the gala dinner for the delegations as well as local cultural leaders. Local musicians, all-inclusive orchestra and a cappella choir were invited by the forum to perform in the dinner, showcasing a blend of Chinese and Western traditional and contemporary music, demonstrating to the guests the diversified and vibrant of art and culture scene in Hong Kong.
     
    In his speech at the dinner, Mr Chan pointed out that the Government has been actively fostering the city’s development into an East-meets-West centre for international cultural exchange with the clear national support in the National 14th Five-Year Plan. With its unique advantage of blending Chinese and Western cultures and its extensive international connections, Hong Kong will become a “super connector” and “super value-adder” between the Mainland and the rest of the world.
     
    The delegations attending the forum visited the Hong Kong Museum of Art and Oil Street Art Space (Oi!) yesterday (April 21). They will attend the plenary session and visit the Hong Kong Palace Museum in the West Kowloon Cultural District tomorrow (April 23).
     
    The Asia Cultural Co-operation Forum has been held since 2003 with the aim of promoting cultural co-operation and exchanges among regions. Drawing on the success of past forums, this year’s forum is themed “Connect, Create, Engage: Bridging Cultures for All” and has expanded its scale. In addition to inviting more Asian countries to participate, Belt and Road countries outside of Asia are invited to participate for the first time to further promote cultural exchanges with countries in the region.
    Issued at HKT 20:54

    NNNN

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: India hosts inaugural Capacity Building Programme for Central Asian Republics on combating terrorism financing

    Source: Government of India

    India hosts inaugural Capacity Building Programme for Central Asian Republics on combating terrorism financing

    Senior experts from five Central Asian countries of Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, and Kyrgyzstan participated in knowledge exchange

    Posted On: 22 APR 2025 7:38PM by PIB Delhi

    The Department of Revenue (DoR), in collaboration with the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) and the National Security Council Secretariat (NSCS), successfully organised the first-ever Capacity Building Programme for Central Asian Republics (CARs) on ‘Countering the Financing of Terrorism (CFT) through Cryptocurrencies, Crowdfunding, and Non-Profit Organisations’. The two-day programme was held on 21st-22nd April, 2025.

     

    Bringing together senior experts from five Central Asian countries — Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, and Kyrgyzstan — the programme served as a platform for knowledge exchange and regional cooperation in tackling terrorism financing. Participants benefited from a series of sessions led by Indian authorities, including representatives from the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) Cell of the Department of Revenue, Ministry of Home Affairs, the National Investigation Agency (NIA), and the Financial Intelligence Unit – India (FIU-IND). Additionally, an expert from the Eurasian Group (EAG), a FATF-style regional body (FSRB), contributed valuable insights on Anti-Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism (AML/CFT) standards, with a focus on the non-profit and virtual asset sectors.

    Customised to the specific needs of the Central Asian region, the programme aimed to build technical capacity and deepen understanding of emerging terrorism financing risks. Through interactive discussions, case studies, and the sharing of operational best practices, the initiative fostered a collaborative approach to addressing key challenges.

    Technical sessions explored a broad range of issues, including the use of financial intelligence in terrorism-related investigations, the growing threat posed by the misuse of Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs), and the exploitation of crowdfunding platforms. Additional discussions covered the financing of radicalization and the abuse of Non-Profit Organizations (NPOs) for terrorist purposes.

    This initiative marks a significant step forward in strengthening regional cooperation and resilience against terrorism financing, reflecting India’s commitment to global counterterrorism efforts.

    ****

    NB/KMN

    (Release ID: 2123579) Visitor Counter : 114

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News

  • MIL-OSI Russia: IMF Executive Board Concludes 2025 Article IV Consultation with the Republic of Azerbaijan

    Source: IMF – News in Russian

    April 22, 2025

    Washington, DC: On March 21, 2025, the Executive Board of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) concluded the Article IV consultation[1] with Azerbaijan and endorsed the staff appraisal, as well as the 2024 Financial System Stability Assessment.

    Following a slowdown in 2023, growth accelerated, and inflation picked up. Real GDP increased by 4.1 percent in 2024, up from 1.4 percent in 2023, supported by strong growth in construction, communication, transportation, and hospitality sectors. After declining by 2 percent in 2023, hydrocarbon GDP stabilized in 2024, as moderate gas production expansion compensated for the decline in oil output. Inflation picked up in the second half of 2024, partly reflecting adjustment in administered prices, reaching 4.9 percent at the end of the year, still within the CBA target of 4 ±2 percent. The 2024 Financial Sector Assessment Program (FSAP) found the financial sector to be broadly resilient against severe shocks.

    The decline in oil and gas prices reduced the 2024 external surplus, but fiscal consolidation resumed. After recording a surplus of 11.5 percent of GDP in 2023, the current account balance is projected to weaken in 2024. During the first three quarters of 2024, the current account surplus has been about 50 percent lower than in the same period last year. The combined CBA and SOFAZ reserves reached about US$ 71 billion by end-2024, covering 41 months of next year’s imports. After remaining broadly unchanged in 2023, the nonoil primary deficit declined in 2024 to 20.5 percent on nonoil GDP, from 22.1 percent of nonoil GDP in 2023, reflecting strong nonoil tax revenues.   

    Looking ahead, growth is projected to moderate and inflation to remain within the CBA target. Growth is projected to slow down to 3.5 percent in 2025, reflecting a slowdown in investment and flat hydrocarbon production. In the medium term, growth is projected to be 2 ½ percent, in line with potential growth. Assuming broadly stable international food and energy prices, inflation is projected to remain within the CBA target of 4 ±2 percent. External position is projected to weaken in the medium term as hydrocarbon production declines, but FX reserves will remain strong.

    Risks to the outlook remain broadly balanced but external uncertainty is high. Reduced hydrocarbon prices as a result of higher supply or lower demand could adversely affect growth, external position, and fiscal revenues. Conversely, intensification of conflicts could push hydrocarbon prices higher, providing a temporary boost to external and fiscal position. Deepening geoeconomic fragmentation, as well as trade and investment shocks, could affect prospects for development of the nonhydrocarbon sector and economic diversification, and slower global growth could weigh on Azerbaijan’s prospects. On the other side, trade and investment diversion to the region could also provide new opportunities. On the domestic side, pressures to increase budgetary spending could increase inflation, delay fiscal consolidation, and weaken the fiscal position and fiscal rule credibility. The presence of inefficient SOEs could undermine the development of the private sector, which is key to diversifying the economy and boosting growth.

    Executive Board Assessment[2]

    In concluding the AIV consultation with Azerbaijan, Executive Directors endorsed the staff’s appraisal as follows:

    Executive Directors agreed with the thrust of the staff appraisal. They noted that Azerbaijan’s growth has remained resilient, supported by robust non‑oil sector activity, and inflation is contained. Directors concurred that risks to the outlook are broadly balanced but are subject to significant uncertainty. They called for continued prudent policies and reforms to support diversification and sustainable growth over the medium term.

    Directors welcomed the authorities’ adherence to the fiscal targets under the fiscal rule. Cautioning that the expansionary 2025 budget would be procyclical, they broadly called on the authorities to continue with the fiscal adjustment in 2025, including by saving any revenue overperformance or expenditure shortfall to help contain inflationary pressures and reinforce fiscal sustainability. While recognizing Azerbaijan’s investment needs, Directors urged the authorities to pursue fiscal consolidation over the medium term to ensure intergenerational equity, underpinned by revenue and expenditure measures and reforms to strengthen the fiscal rule framework. They noted the benefits of a potential TADAT and PIMA to support these efforts.

    Directors viewed the central bank’s current monetary policy stance as appropriate, with inflation within the central bank target band and the recent increase appearing transitory. They emphasized the need to closely monitor inflation risks and to be prepared to act swiftly if needed. Directors welcomed the enhanced monetary policy transmission and called for continued efforts to improve the monetary policy framework to prepare for a possible transition to a hybrid inflation targeting regime.

    Directors welcomed the 2024 FSAP’s assessment that Azerbaijan’s financial system is broadly resilient, and the banking sector is well‑capitalized. They commended the authorities for the significant progress in reinvigorating the regulatory reform agenda, and bolstering banks’ capital and liquidity buffers to reinforce financial stability. Directors encouraged continued progress in strengthening prudential oversight and the financial safety net and expanding the systemic risk analysis and stress testing frameworks to address remaining vulnerabilities. In this regard, they underscored the importance of fully implementing consolidated supervision, developing early warning indicators and triggers for supervisory actions, reinforcing the resilience of domestic systemically important banks, and strengthening the emergency liquidity assistance framework.

    Directors emphasized the need for private sector development to support economic diversification. They called for continued reforms to strengthen corporate governance in state‑owned enterprises, and to create a level playing field for the private sector. Directors also called on the authorities to continue efforts to improve governance, combat corruption, and further strengthen the AML/CFT framework. They encouraged the authorities to intensify efforts to increase private sector access to finance and contribute to the global climate agenda.

    Azerbaijan: Selected Economic and Financial Indicators, 2022–30

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

         

    Est.

    Projections

    2022

    2023

    2024

    2025

    2026

    2027

    2028

    2029

    2030

     

    (Annual percentage change, unless otherwise specified)

    National income

                     

       GDP at constant prices

    4.7

    1.4

    4.1

    3.5

    2.5

    2.4

    2.4

    2.5

    2.5

          Of which: Oil sector 1/

    -2.4

    -2.0

    0.3

    0.2

    -0.5

    -0.5

    -0.5

    -0.5

    -0.5

                              Non-oil sector

    9.1

    4.5

    6.2

    4.5

    3.7

    3.5

    3.5

    3.5

    3.5

       Consumer price index (period average)

    13.9

    8.8

    2.2

    5.7

    4.5

    4.0

    4.0

    4.0

    4.0

       Consumer price index (end of period)

    14.4

    2.1

    4.9

    5.2

    4.0

    4.0

    4.0

    4.0

    4.0

    Money and credit

                     

       Domestic credit, net

    29.9

    14.7

    5.0

    9.1

    6.9

    7.0

    6.8

    6.9

    6.9

          Of which: Credit to private sector

    17.4

    14.7

    15.9

    10.0

    8.0

    8.0

    8.0

    8.0

    8.0

       Manat base money

    -2.8

    19.4

    0.4

    9.0

    9.0

    9.0

    9.0

    9.0

    9.0

       Manat broad money

    23.8

    19.6

    9.0

    10.6

    7.9

    8.4

    8.3

    8.4

    8.4

       Total broad money

    23.6

    5.3

    11.9

    9.2

    6.5

    7.0

    7.0

    7.0

    7.0

    External sector

                     

    Exports f.o.b.

    94.6

    -30.8

    -8.8

    10.8

    -10.0

    -9.9

    -8.0

    0.3

    0.3

    Of which: Oil sector

    105.1

    -34.0

    -10.1

    10.8

    -12.0

    -12.5

    -10.7

    -0.9

    -0.9

    Imports f.o.b.

    29.7

    21.4

    2.7

    12.0

    0.9

    3.0

    5.1

    6.5

    6.6

    Of which: Oil sector

    56.3

    12.2

    -6.9

    1.4

    1.5

    1.7

    2.1

    0.0

    0.0

    Real effective exchange rate

    11.8

    8.1

    -1.1

     

    (In percent of GDP, unless otherwise specified)

    Gross investment

    12.1

    18.3

    17.8

    18.3

    16.2

    14.6

    13.7

    13.7

    13.7

       Consolidated government

    8.0

    12.2

    11.3

    11.7

    10.0

    8.8

    8.1

    8.1

    8.1

       Private sector

    4.1

    6.1

    6.5

    6.7

    6.2

    5.8

    5.6

    5.6

    5.6

          Of which: Oil sector

    -6.3

    -0.3

    1.1

    1.3

    1.5

    1.6

    1.7

    1.6

    1.6

    Gross national savings

    42.1

    29.8

    25.7

    26.1

    20.4

    15.1

    11.3

    10.4

    9.6

    Consolidated general government finances 2/

                     

       Total revenue and grants

    32.1

    40.6

    37.1

    34.4

    32.8

    31.0

    29.8

    29.5

    29.2

       Total expenditure

    26.2

    32.7

    33.8

    35.6

    34.5

    33.4

    32.5

    31.7

    31.0

      Current expenditure

    18.2

    20.5

    22.5

    23.9

    24.4

    24.6

    24.4

    24.4

    24.0

      Net acquisition of non-financial assets

    8.0

    12.2

    11.3

    11.7

    10.0

    8.8

    8.1

    7.3

    7.0

       Overall fiscal balance

    6.0

    7.9

    3.2

    -1.3

    -1.7

    -2.4

    -2.8

    -2.1

    -1.8

       Non-oil primary balance, in percent of non-oil GDP

    -22.4

    -22.1

    -20.5

    -22.1

    -18.6

    -16.3

    -14.5

    -12.7

    -11.3

       General government debt 3/

    17.3

    21.8

    20.9

    21.0

    22.2

    22.7

    23.1

    23.8

    23.8

       General government and government-guaranteed debt

    26.9

    28.9

    27.6

    27.6

    28.6

    28.9

    29.1

    29.6

    29.4

    External sector

                     

       Current account (- deficit)

    29.8

    11.5

    7.8

    7.8

    4.1

    0.5

    -2.4

    -3.3

    -4.2

       Foreign direct investment (net)

    -6.5

    -2.9

    -0.7

    -0.4

    -0.2

    0.0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.5

    Memorandum items:

                     

       Gross official international reserves (in millions of U.S. dollars)

    8,996

    11,281

    10,960

    10,760

    10,560

    10,360

    10,160

    9,960

    9,760

    in months of next year’s non-oil imports f.o.b.

    5.4

    7.7

    6.6

    6.4

    6.1

    5.7

    5.3

    4.9

    4.6

       Nominal GDP (in millions of manat)

    133,973

    123,128

    126,337

    134,078

    139,182

    145,847

    153,556

    162,135

    171,522

       Nominal non-oil GDP (in millions of manat)

    69,764

    78,990

    85,712

    94,674

    102,595

    110,434

    118,825

    127,903

    137,675

       Nominal GDP (in millions of U.S. dollars)

    78,807

    72,429

    74,316

    78,870

    81,872

    85,792

    90,327

    95,373

    100,895

       Oil Fund Assets (in millions of U.S. dollars)

    49,034

    56,070

    60,031

    60,911

    61,797

    61,864

    61,594

    62,222

    62,949

       Assumed oil price, WEO plus $2-$3 premium (in U.S. dollars per barrel)

    98.4

    82.6

    81.2

    78.6

    73.5

    71.6

    70.6

    72.0

    73.4

       Assumed natural gas price, WEO plus a premium (in U.S. dollars per thousands of cubic meters)

    1340.0

    460.1

    389.0

    517.4

    424.7

    342.2

    290.2

    290.2

    290.2

       Exchange rate (manat/dollar, end of period)

    1.7

    1.7

    1.7

       Sources: National authorities; and IMF staff estimates and projections.

       1/ Includes the production and processing of oil and gas.

    2/ Consolidates State Budget, State Oil Fund of Azerbaijan (SOFAZ), Nakhchevan Autonomous Region (NAK) and State Social Protection Fund.

    3/ Starting in 2021, includes guarantees issued to Aqrakredit for its acquisition of distressed assets from the IBA.

    [1] Under Article IV of the IMF’s Articles of Agreement, the IMF holds bilateral discussions with members, usually every year. A staff team visits the country, collects economic and financial information, and discusses with officials the country’s economic developments and policies. On return to headquarters, the staff prepares a report, which forms the basis for discussion by the Executive Board.

    [2] At the conclusion of the discussion, the Managing Director, as Chairman of the Board, summarizes the views of Executive Directors, and this summary is transmitted to the country’s authorities. An explanation of any qualifiers used in summings up can be found here: http://www.IMF.org/external/np/sec/misc/qualifiers.htm.

    IMF Communications Department
    MEDIA RELATIONS

    PRESS OFFICER: Mayada Ghazala

    Phone: +1 202 623-7100Email: MEDIA@IMF.org

    https://www.imf.org/en/News/Articles/2025/04/22/pr-25118-azerbaijan-imf-concludes-2025-article-iv-consultation

    MIL OSI

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Padilla, Booker, Reed Introduce Bills to Permanently Protect the Pacific and Atlantic Oceans from Offshore Drilling

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Alex Padilla (D-Calif.)

    Padilla, Booker, Reed Introduce Bills to Permanently Protect the Pacific and Atlantic Oceans from Offshore Drilling

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — On Earth Day, U.S. Senators Alex Padilla (D-Calif.), Cory Booker (D-N.J.), and Jack Reed (D-R.I.) announced a pair of bills to permanently protect the Pacific and Atlantic Oceans from the dangers of fossil fuel drilling. The package includes Padilla’s West Coast Ocean Protection Act, which would permanently prohibit new oil and gas leases for offshore drilling off the coast of California, Oregon, and Washington, as well as Booker and Reed’s Clean Ocean and Safe Tourism (COAST) Anti-Drilling Act, which would permanently prohibit the U.S. Department of the Interior from issuing leases for the exploration, development, or production of oil and gas in the North Atlantic, Mid-Atlantic, South Atlantic, and Straits of Florida Planning Areas of the U.S. Outer Continental Shelf.

    This legislation comes just after the 15th anniversary of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill, which resulted in the deaths of 11 workers, 134 million gallons spilled into the Gulf of Mexico over 87 days, the demise of thousands of marine mammals and sea turtles, and billions of dollars in economic losses from the fishing, outdoor recreation, and tourism industries.

    Representative Jared Huffman (D-Calif.-02), Ranking Member of the House Natural Resources Committee, and Frank Pallone, Jr. (D-N.J.-06), Ranking Member of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, are leading companion legislation in the House for the West Coast Ocean Protection Act and the Clean Ocean and Safe Tourism (COAST) Anti-Drilling Act, respectively.

    A one-pager on the West Coast Protection Act is available here.

    Full text of the West Coast Protection Act is available here, and full text of the COAST Anti-Drilling Act is available here.

    “We must end offshore oil drilling in coastal waters once and for all,” said Senator Padilla. “Over 50 years ago, after a catastrophic oil spill off the coast of Santa Barbara, Californians rose up and demanded environmental protections, spurring the modern environmental movement and creating the very first Earth Day. As the Trump Administration threatens to recklessly open our coasts to new drilling, California and the West Coast need permanent safeguards to protect our communities from the devastation of fossil fuels and disastrous oil spills. We must act now to fulfill the promises we made to our children and our constituents to meet the urgency of this environmental crisis with bold action.”

    “This week marks both Earth Day and the 15th anniversary of the Deepwater Horizon oil disaster,” said Senator Booker. “I’m standing alongside my colleagues in the House and Senate to reaffirm our commitment to protecting our communities and our environment. Offshore drilling endangers our coastal communities – both their lives and their livelihoods – and threatens marine species and ecosystems. The COAST Act, along with this critical package of legislation, will ensure that marine seascapes along the Atlantic and Pacific Coasts, and the wildlife, industries, and communities that rely on them, are protected from the dangers of fossil fuel drilling.”

    “Offshore drilling in the Atlantic Ocean would open up the eastern seaboard to considerable risk, and we have seen the destruction that an accident can cause. This legislation is about more than simply protecting the environment, it’s also about protecting the tourism and fishing industries that create jobs and help power Rhode Island’s economy,” said Senator Reed.

    “It’s clear that in the 15 years since the most catastrophic oil spill disaster in history, Republicans in the pocket of Big Oil have learned nothing. Offshore drilling poses significant threats to our public health, coastal economies, and marine life. The science is clear, and so is the public sentiment: we need to speed up our transition to a clean energy future, not lock ourselves into another generation of fossil fuel fealty,” said Representative Huffman. “We cannot let history repeat itself. My Democratic colleagues aren’t standing idly by as the Trump administration tries to reverse all of our progress so they can give handouts to Big Oil. Our legislation will cut pollution and ramp up clean energy, ensuring our coasts remain safe, clean, and open to all Americans— not turned into open season for fossil fuel billionaires looking to drill, spill, and cash in.” 

    “For decades, I’ve fought to protect our coasts from the dangers of oil and gas development, and this legislative package reaffirms that commitment. Offshore drilling risks devastating spills, accelerates climate change, and threatens the livelihoods of coastal communities like those in New Jersey. On Earth Day and every day, we must stand up to Big Oil and prioritize renewable energy that actually protects our planet,” said Representative Pallone.

    These bills reaffirm vital protections for America’s coastal communities and ecosystems. The Biden Administration protected more than 625 million acres of U.S. ocean waters — including the Pacific coasts of Washington, Oregon, and California, the entire East Coast, the eastern Gulf of Mexico, and parts of the Northern Bering Sea — from offshore oil and gas drilling. President Trump immediately tried to roll back those protections, attempting to illegally reopen those areas to drilling on day one of his second term. Trump’s record speaks for itself: during his first Administration, the Interior Department proposed a sweeping plan to open 47 offshore oil and gas lease areas across nearly every U.S. coastline, from California to New England.

    The two bills would protect critical coastal communities, economies, and ecosystems against offshore drilling, which is especially important in the face of the climate crisis. U.S. coastal counties support 54.6 million jobs, produce $10 trillion in goods and services, and pay $4 trillion in wages. Offshore drilling poses significant threats to public health, coastal economies, and diverse marine life that play an important economical, ecological, and cultural role in our ecosystem. 

    California began efforts to block offshore drilling in 1969 when an oil rig off the coast of Santa Barbara leaked 3 million gallons of crude oil into the ocean, blanketing beaches with a thick layer of oil and killing thousands of marine mammals and birds. It was the largest oil spill in U.S. history until the Exxon Valdez spill 20 years later. California is also approaching the 10th anniversary of the Refugio State Beach Oil Spill, in which a Plains All American Pipeline in Santa Barbara County ruptured and spilled hundreds of thousands of gallons of crude oil, marking the worst spill in the area since 1969 and impacting some of the most biologically diverse regions along California coast.

    After the 1969 Santa Barbara spill, California blocked all new offshore oil drilling in state waters, protecting our coastal waters up to three miles from the shore. The state reinforced that ban in 1994 by passing the California Coastal Sanctuary Act, which prohibited new leasing in state waters. However, in 2018, the Trump Administration released a five-year offshore leasing plan that proposed opening up the entire West Coast to new drilling despite widespread opposition in Pacific coast states. This proposal was blocked by the courts, but the threat of drilling remains until a permanent ban is enacted.

    The West Coast Protection Act is cosponsored by Senators Cory Booker (D-N.J.), Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.), Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.), Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), Patty Murray (D-Wash.), Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), and Ron Wyden (D-Ore.). It is endorsed by organizations including Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), Oceana, Defenders of Wildlife, Earthjustice, Surfrider Foundation, Seattle Aquarium, Turtle Island Restoration Network, Nassau Hiking & Outdoor Club, Lee (MA) Greener Gateway Committee, South Shore Audubon Society (Freeport, NY), Sierra Club, League of Conservation Voters, Futureswell, Ocean Conservancy, Environment America, WILDCOAST, Food & Water Watch, Environmental Protection Information Center, Ocean Defense Initiative, Center for Biological Diversity, The Ocean Project, Business Alliance to Protect the Pacific Coast, Animal Welfare Institute, Wild Cumberland, Climate Reality Project – North Broward and Palm Beach County Chapter, U.S. Climate Action Network, American Bird Conservancy, Surf Industry Members Association, Business Alliance for Protecting the Pacific Coast (BAPPC), Clean Ocean Action, and Hispanic Access Foundation.

    The COAST Anti-Drilling Act is cosponsored by Senator Padilla as well as Senators Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), Chris Coons (D-Del.), Angus King (I-Maine), Markey, Merkley, Sanders, Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.), Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Whitehouse, and Wyden. It is endorsed by organizations including Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), Oceana, Surfrider Foundation, Earthjustice, Turtle Island Restoration Network, Nassau Hiking & Outdoor Club, Lee (MA) Greener Gateway Committee, South Shore Audubon Society (Freeport, NY), Sierra Club, League of Conservation Voters, Futureswell, Ocean Conservancy, Environment America, Food & Water Watch, Waterspirit, Business Alliance to Protect the Atlantic, Clean Ocean Action, Jersey Coast Anglers Association (NJ), American Littoral Society, Save Coastal Wildlife, Environmental Protection Information Center, Defenders of Wildlife, Ocean Defense Initiative, Center for Biological Diversity, The Ocean Project, North Carolina Coastal Federation, Animal Welfare Institute, Wild Cumberland, Climate Reality Project – North Broward and Palm Beach County Chapter, U.S. Climate Action Network, National Aquarium, American Bird Conservancy, and Hispanic Access Foundation.

    “It’s time to end the threat of expanded drilling off America’s coasts forever,” said Joseph Gordon, Oceana Campaign Director. “Oceana applauds these Congressional leaders for reintroducing pivotal legislation that would establish permanent protections from offshore oil and gas drilling for millions of acres of ocean. Earth Day is an important reminder that every coastal community deserves healthy oceans and oil-free beaches. This bill is part of a national movement to safeguard our multi-billion-dollar coastal economies from dirty and dangerous offshore drilling. Congress must swiftly pass these bills into law and reject any expansion of drilling to protect our coasts.”

    “Protecting these waters puts coastal communities and wildlife above polluters and brings us closer to a world where our waters are free from oil spills, endangered whale populations are free from seismic blasting, and local economies can thrive,” said Taryn Kiekow Heimer, Director of Ocean Energy at NRDC (Natural Resources Defense Council). “Now more than ever, we need leadership from Congress to protect our oceans from an industry that only cares about its bottom line – and a Trump administration willing to do anything to give those oil billionaires what they want.”

    “The Trump administration’s path of so-called ‘energy dominance’ is paved with threats to American coasts,” said Sierra Weaver, senior attorney for Defenders of Wildlife. “This set of bills offers real protections for coastal communities and wildlife against unwanted, unreasonable and unsafe offshore oil drilling. This is just the type of bold action we need on the 15th anniversary of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill, the worst environmental disaster in U.S. history.”

    “Imperiled species like Southern resident orcas and sea otters need clean, healthy ocean habitats to thrive. New offshore drilling would bring habitat destruction, noise pollution and the threat of spills and chronic contamination to those species and their homes,” said Joseph Vaile, Northwest Program senior representative for Defenders of Wildlife. “This legislation is a critical step toward permanently safeguarding marine mammals and coastal communities from irreversible harm. We thank Senator Padilla for championing the West Coast Ocean Protection Act at a time when the threat of offshore drilling is especially urgent.”

    “California’s spectacular marine life — including complex kelp forests and charismatic sea otters — and vibrant coastal economies rely on healthy ecosystems. This legislation could, once and for all, block offshore drilling activities along the continental shelf, and protect critical marine habitats along California’s iconic Pacific Coast,” said Pamela Flick, Defenders of Wildlife California Program Director.

    “These bills will permanently protect our coastal communities from the threats of offshore drilling. Oil spills like the one caused by the deadly BP drilling disaster 15 years ago are dangerous to people’s health and our public waters. The economic vitality of entire regions depend on oceans staying healthy,” said Earthjustice Senior Legislative Representative Laura M. Esquivel. “We applaud these Members of Congress for doing what’s right on behalf of their constituents.” 

    “These important bills will protect our environment, communities, and economy from the harmful effects of offshore oil and gas development. Offshore drilling is a dirty and damaging practice that threatens our nation’s ocean recreation, tourism, and fisheries industries valued at $250 billion annually. The Surfrider Foundation urges members of Congress to support this important legislation to prohibit new offshore drilling in U.S. waters,” said Pete Stauffer, Ocean Protection Manager, Surfrider Foundation.

    “These bills are critical, especially now. Protecting our environment and frontline communities from the dangers of offshore oil and gas development must be a top priority in the face of the escalating climate and biodiversity crises,” said Elizabeth Purcell, Environmental Policy Coordinator with Turtle Island Restoration Network. “Congress must act swiftly and support these bills to protect our oceans from further exploitation by the oil and gas industry, ensuring a healthy and safe planet for all.”

    “We are the generation that will live with the consequences of today’s energy choices. As young ocean advocates, we want to leave a better legacy for ocean health behind us than what has been left for us,” said Mark Haver, North America Regional Representative with Sustainable Ocean Alliance. “Congress has a moral responsibility to prevent new offshore oil and gas drilling leases. We will be counting on Congress to act on behalf of our ocean and future generations.”

    “Our coasts are a source of life, livelihood, and recreation for coastal communities and the millions of visitors they see every year,” said Athan Manuel, Director of the Sierra Club’s Lands Protection Program. “They also support untold diverse wildlife and ecosystems that are put at risk by exploitation from the oil and gas industry. These bills provide much-needed critical protections for the health of our coastal communities and to ensure that future generations will get to enjoy the wonders of our oceans and beaches.”

    “It has been clear for years that we cannot afford to expand fossil fuel extraction and burning if we want any hope of staving off the ever worsening effects of climate change,” said Mitch Jones, Managing Director of Policy and Litigation at Food & Water Watch. “In addition to the threat of worsening climate chaos, offshore drilling directly endangers local environments, wildlife, and economies due to the threats of oil spills and disruptions to aquatic life. We urge Congress to pass these bills to protect our coastlines and our oceans from Trump’s disastrous push for more drilling.”

    “Water is the pulse of our planet, the sacred thread that connects all life. We all have a responsibility to protect the very essence that sustains us,” said Rachel Dawn Davis, Public Policy & Justice Organizer at Waterspirit. “The threat of exploitation-whether through drilling or pollution-puts ecosystems and future generations at risk. We must continue to honor and defend our waters; in preserving them, we preserve life itself.”

    “Our oceans provide forever benefits in so many ways for both local communities and whole nations. We thoroughly support the bipartisan protections put forward in these Bills, which would position the United States to lead the world and reap huge benefits for tourism, energy security, health and local jobs, not to mention the beautiful wildlife that drives billions of dollars of tourism and other benefits,” said Global Rewilding Alliance.

    “A clean ocean is crucial for the conservation of marine biodiversity,” said Jenna Reynolds, Executive Director of Save Coastal Wildlife. “A polluted ocean poses significant risks to marine wildlife, including increased vessel traffic around oil platforms, which can lead to collisions with marine animals, especially sea turtles and juvenile whales which are difficult to see from moving vessels. Oil spills can directly coat and kill marine animals, including seabirds, sea turtles, marine mammals, and can also damage coastal ecosystems like beaches and coastal wetlands, impacting wildlife and people that rely on these areas. We need to bring back and fully protect biodiversity in our ocean!”

    “We must work toward a future where our coastal communities, economies, and marine life can thrive thanks to a healthy ocean. As the Trump Administration seeks to threaten our favorite beaches and ecosystems with new offshore drilling, it’s more important than ever for ocean champions in Congress to advance ocean protections,” said Sarah Guy, Ocean Defense Initiative. “We are grateful for the leadership of members supporting these bills, and commit to working toward a future where all our coasts are protected from the harms of offshore drilling.”

    “We believe our coasts are far too valuable to risk for short-term fossil fuel gains,” said Katie Thompson, Executive Director of Save Our Shores. “Permanently protecting offshore areas from oil and gas leasing is a critical step toward safeguarding marine ecosystems, coastal communities, and our climate future. These bills reflect the will of the people to prioritize ocean health and long-term sustainability over polluting industries of the past.”

    “This suite of legislation is a critical move to safeguard our marine resources against Trump and his Big Oil agenda,” said Rachel Rilee, oceans policy specialist at the Center for Biological Diversity. “It’s been 15 years since the Deepwater Horizon oil disaster devastated coastlines and killed hundreds of thousands of marine animals. Our oceans and the incredible ecosystems they support are counting on us. Congress must pass these bills and then get right back to work protecting marine life and coastal communities from every manmade danger and every Republican attack.”

    “Americans love our coasts. For some of us, they’re home, and for many others, they’re home to wonderful memories, including family vacations at the beach, fishing trips with friends, and encounters with wildlife like sea turtles, dolphins, and whales. But oil spills can destroy all of that. It’s simply not worth the risk. We must not squander our children’s inheritance,” said Bill Mott, Executive Director of The Ocean Project. “The ocean offers endless inspiration, recreational opportunities, and serves as a critically important economic driver. Yet despite its vastness, it is incredibly vulnerable. As we’ve seen too many times before, offshore oil and gas drilling is not compatible with stewarding our ocean. We all share a responsibility to keep our coasts clean and our ocean healthy for future generations. That’s why we urge Congress to act now to prohibit new offshore oil and gas development forever.”

    “AWI commends these Congressional leaders for taking bold action to protect our oceans and coasts from dirty, dangerous oil and gas development along the outer continental shelf,” said Georgia Hancock, Senior Attorney and Director of the Animal Welfare Institute’s marine wildlife program. “Fifteen years after the Deepwater Horizon disaster, it remains painfully clear: there is no such thing as safe offshore oil drilling, nor is there any way to fully clean up a significant oil spill. Keeping oil rigs out of the ocean prevents unnecessary harm to sensitive marine animals like sea turtles, whales, and seabirds, and avoids the massive costs associated with environmental remediation when things go wrong. These bills draw a clear line in the sand: our marine ecosystems are too precious to risk.”

    “The Pacific west coast economy provides over $80 Billion in GDP via industries like tourism, outdoor recreation, fishing, retail, and real estate, supporting more than 825,000 jobs. And BAPPC’s 8,100 business members rely on a clean ocean to drive their revenues and provide for their customers, employees and families. We strongly support the West Coast Protection Act and other legislation to prohibit new offshore drilling and protect our businesses by prioritizing a healthy coastal ecosystem,” said Grant Bixby, Founding Member, The Business Alliance for Protecting the Pacific Coast.

    “The impact of offshore oil drilling on marine life is well-documented, from toxic discharges of drilling mud and fracking chemicals, to chronic oil spills, to the effects of a major well blow-out as has occurred many times in the history of offshore oil drilling. It is time we stopped burning fossil fuels and switch to non-polluting sources such as wind, solar, and other green energy sources. Industrializing our oceans is the last thing we should be doing,” said the International Marine Mammal Project, Earth Island Institute.

    “The oceans and coasts are the lifeblood of the US economy. They deserve not only protection but increased investment and stewardship. Anyone that threatens the coasts puts the entire US economy at risk,” said the Center for the Blue Economy.

    “We strongly support these bills to protect our vital coastal ecosystems and ocean health, which are increasingly threatened by the climate crisis. Offshore oil and gas leasing not only poses a direct risk of pollution to our waters and endangers marine life, but also contributes to climate change by perpetuating our reliance on fossil fuels. We urge swift passage of these protections to safeguard coastal communities, their economies, and a livable future for all,” said the U.S. Climate Action Network.

    “Offshore oil and gas drilling threatens coastal communities and endangers whales, sea turtles and other wildlife that Americans treasure,” said National Aquarium President and CEO John Racanelli. “On Earth Day and every day, all of us – people and wildlife – rely on a healthy ocean for our very survival. The science is clear that moving from dependence on fossil fuels towards clean energy sources safeguards marine ecosystems and protects public health. Legislation that places sensible limits on new oil and gas development along our shores is just smart public policy.”

    “President Biden’s recent permanent ban on offshore drilling in most ocean realms of the US is strong and cause for celebration! That said, codifying this long-overdue protection with acts of Congress is needed to add bulwark against attempts to override the ban as well as provide proof of bipartisan support for the ocean. The reason is simple: a healthy ocean sustains all life on earth and is essential to a vibrant clean ocean economy,” said Cindy Zipf, Executive Director of Clean Ocean Action.

    “Last year President Biden issued an executive action to protect more than 625 million acres of federal waters from fossil fuel development, a historic and bold decision to defend coastal communities, public health, and ecosystems. Azul’s 2024 nationwide poll found that Latinos across political ideologies support action to ban offshore drilling and are even willing to pay more out of pocket to make it happen. We applaud the leadership of members of Congress seeking to codify protections for coastal waters against offshore drilling, and these added protections are needed to defend against threats to undo existing protections against offshore drilling,” said Marce Gutiérrez-Graudins, Founder of Azul.

    “Protecting our oceans is a matter of safeguarding our health, our economy, and our future. Proposals to reduce existing ocean protections and expand offshore drilling raise serious concerns for coastal communities, marine ecosystems, and millions of livelihoods,” said Maite Arce, President and CEO of Hispanic Access Foundation. “Latino communities, many of whom live along our coasts and rely on clean water and healthy marine environments for recreation, jobs, and cultural connection, are uniquely impacted. We support efforts that uphold strong protections and ensure our public lands and waters remain preserved for future generations. Now is the time for bold, bipartisan leadership that centers communities and protects the ocean legacy we all share.”

    “The New Jersey Environmental Lobby unequivocally supports all of the bills,” said Anne Poole, President of the NJ Environment Lobby. “Our organization’s primary focus is State legislation and policies that affect our densely populated coastal state, but oceans know no national or state boundaries.  The oceans are connected and impact all life on this globe.  What affects one coast eventually affects us all. Thank you to all of these ocean champions for their foresight and political courage!”

    In 2021, Senator Padilla joined West Coast Senators in calling on Senate leadership to include the West Coast Ocean Protection Act in the Senate version of the budget reconciliation bill after an estimated 126,000 gallons of oil spilled off the coast of California.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Highland Council appoints Chief Officer Education – Primary and Early Years

    Source: Scotland – Highland Council

    The Highland Council has appointed Bernadette Scott as Chief Officer Education – Primary and Early Years.

    The appointment completes the new senior management structure of the Council’s People Service Cluster under the leadership of Kate Lackie, Assistant Chief Executive – People.

    Bernadette Scott is currently employed by Perth and Kinross Council as Service Manager, Early Years and Childcare and is a committed education professional with over 30 years’ experience.  Most recently, Mrs Scott’s remit has included taking an overview of services for all children (aged 2-18), with responsibility for improvement in Early Learning and Childcare settings, Primary and Secondary schools. Her strategic remit included raising attainment, performance and reporting and leadership, learning and development of all education staff.

    Prior to her current role in the Central Management Team Bernadette was a Quality Improvement Officer and spent 12 years as a Head Teacher in Perth Primary Schools, leading school development and driving improvements in learning outcomes. 

    Convener of the Council Cllr Bill Lobban said: “I would like to congratulate Bernadette on her appointment and welcome her to The Highland Council. She brings with her a wealth of Education, Early Learning and Childcare experience and leadership to the Council.

    “With this latest appointment I am pleased to see the Council’s senior management structure progressing with continued pace. The new structure is forecasted to initially deliver savings of £370,000 as part of the budget savings agreed by Council in February 2024, and it is anticipated that savings will eventually equate to around 20% of senior management team costs as part of a more streamlined management structure.”

    Bernadette will be starting with Highland Council on 1 June and is looking forward to leading the journey of improvement, working collaboratively to raise primary attainment, support inclusion and deliver the best outcomes for all children and young people across the Highlands.

    As previously intimated in Highland Council’s budget plan for 2024/25, a new senior management structure is being implemented following approval by the Council on 14 March 2024. It reconfigures the senior management team into two layers, rather than three and brings Highland Council into line with other benchmarked authorities.

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI: Results of ING’s 2025 Annual General Meeting

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Results of ING’s 2025 Annual General Meeting

    The Annual General Meeting (AGM) of ING Groep N.V. was held today in Amsterdam.

    The AGM adopted all agenda items, including the annual accounts for 2024, discharge of the members of the Executive Board and the Supervisory Board and the dividend for 2024.

    The AGM also approved the reappointment of Steven van Rijswijk and Ljiljana Čortan to the Executive Board. Stuart Graham and Petri Hofsté were appointed to the Supervisory Board and Margarete Haase and Lodewijk Hijmans van den Bergh were reappointed to the Supervisory Board.

    Note for editors
    For further information on ING, please visit www.ing.com. Frequent news updates can be found in the Newsroom or via the @ING_news X feed. Photos of ING operations, buildings and its executives are available for download at Flickr.

    Press enquiries Investor enquiries
    Raymond Vermeulen ING Group Investor Relations
    +31 20 576 6369 +31 20 576 6396
    Raymond.Vermeulen@ing.com Investor.Relations@ing.com

    ING PROFILE
    ING is a global financial institution with a strong European base, offering banking services through its operating company ING Bank. The purpose of ING Bank is: empowering people to stay a step ahead in life and in business. ING Bank’s more than 60,000 employees offer retail and wholesale banking services to customers in over 100 countries.

    ING Group shares are listed on the exchanges of Amsterdam (INGA NA, INGA.AS), Brussels and on the New York Stock Exchange (ADRs: ING US, ING.N).

    ING aims to put sustainability at the heart of what we do. Our policies and actions are assessed by independent research and ratings providers, which give updates on them annually. ING’s ESG rating by MSCI was reconfirmed by MSCI as ‘AA’ in August 2024 for the fifth year. As of December 2023, in Sustainalytics’ view, ING’s management of ESG material risk is ‘Strong’. Our current ESG Risk Rating, is 17.2 (Low Risk). ING Group shares are also included in major sustainability and ESG index products of leading providers. Here are some examples: Euronext, STOXX, Morningstar and FTSE Russell. Society is transitioning to a low-carbon economy. So are our clients, and so is ING. We finance a lot of sustainable activities, but we still finance more that’s not. Follow our progress on ing.com/climate.

    Important legal information
    Elements of this press release contain or may contain information about ING Groep N.V. and/ or ING Bank N.V. within the meaning of Article 7(1) to (4) of EU Regulation No 596/2014 (‘Market Abuse Regulation’).

    ING Group’s annual accounts are prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the European Union (‘IFRS- EU’). In preparing the financial information in this document, except as described otherwise, the same accounting principles are applied as in the 2024 ING Group consolidated annual accounts. All figures in this document are unaudited. Small differences are possible in the tables due to rounding.

    Certain of the statements contained herein are not historical facts, including, without limitation, certain statements made of future expectations and other forward-looking statements that are based on management’s current views and assumptions and involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results, performance or events to differ materially from those expressed or implied in such statements. Actual results, performance or events may differ materially from those in such statements due to a number of factors, including, without limitation: (1) changes in general economic conditions and customer behaviour, in particular economic conditions in ING’s core markets, including changes affecting currency exchange rates and the regional and global economic impact of the invasion of Russia into Ukraine and related international response measures (2) changes affecting interest rate levels (3) any default of a major market participant and related market disruption (4) changes in performance of financial markets, including in Europe and developing markets (5) fiscal uncertainty in Europe and the United States (6) discontinuation of or changes in ‘benchmark’ indices (7) inflation and deflation in our principal markets (8) changes in conditions in the credit and capital markets generally, including changes in borrower and counterparty creditworthiness (9) failures of banks falling under the scope of state compensation schemes (10) non- compliance with or changes in laws and regulations, including those concerning financial services, financial economic crimes and tax laws, and the interpretation and application thereof (11) geopolitical risks, political instabilities and policies and actions of governmental and regulatory authorities, including in connection with the invasion of Russia into Ukraine and the related international response measures (12) legal and regulatory risks in certain countries with less developed legal and regulatory frameworks (13) prudential supervision and regulations, including in relation to stress tests and regulatory restrictions on dividends and distributions (also among members of the group) (14) ING’s ability to meet minimum capital and other prudential regulatory requirements (15) changes in regulation of US commodities and derivatives businesses of ING and its customers (16) application of bank recovery and resolution regimes, including write down and conversion powers in relation to our securities (17) outcome of current and future litigation, enforcement proceedings, investigations or other regulatory actions, including claims by customers or stakeholders who feel misled or treated unfairly, and other conduct issues (18) changes in tax laws and regulations and risks of non-compliance or investigation in connection with tax laws, including FATCA (19) operational and IT risks, such as system disruptions or failures, breaches of security, cyber-attacks, human error, changes in operational practices or inadequate controls including in respect of third parties with which we do business and including any risks as a result of incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise flawed outputs from the algorithms and data sets utilized in artificial intelligence (20) risks and challenges related to cybercrime including the effects of cyberattacks and changes in legislation and regulation related to cybersecurity and data privacy, including such risks and challenges as a consequence of the use of emerging technologies, such as advanced forms of artificial intelligence and quantum computing (21) changes in general competitive factors, including ability to increase or maintain market share (22) inability to protect our intellectual property and infringement claims by third parties (23) inability of counterparties to meet financial obligations or ability to enforce rights against such counterparties (24) changes in credit ratings (25) business, operational, regulatory, reputation, transition and other risks and challenges in connection with climate change, diversity, equity and inclusion and other ESG-related matters, including data gathering and reporting and also including managing the conflicting laws and requirements of governments, regulators and authorities with respect to these topics (26) inability to attract and retain key personnel (27) future liabilities under defined benefit retirement plans (28) failure to manage business risks, including in connection with use of models, use of derivatives, or maintaining appropriate policies and guidelines (29) changes in capital and credit markets, including interbank funding, as well as customer deposits, which provide the liquidity and capital required to fund our operations, and (30) the other risks and uncertainties detailed in the most recent annual report of ING Groep N.V. (including the Risk Factors contained therein) and ING’s more recent disclosures, including press releases, which are available on www.ING.com.

    This document may contain ESG-related material that has been prepared by ING on the basis of publicly available information, internally developed data and other third-party sources believed to be reliable. ING has not sought to independently verify information obtained from public and third-party sources and makes no representations or warranties as to accuracy, completeness, reasonableness or reliability of such information.

    Materiality, as used in the context of ESG, is distinct from, and should not be confused with, such term as defined in the Market Abuse Regulation or as defined for Securities and Exchange Commission (‘SEC’) reporting purposes. Any issues identified as material for purposes of ESG in this document are therefore not necessarily material as defined in the Market Abuse Regulation or for SEC reporting purposes. In addition, there is currently no single, globally recognized set of accepted definitions in assessing whether activities are “green” or “sustainable.” Without limiting any of the statements contained herein, we make no representation or warranty as to whether any of our securities constitutes a green or sustainable security or conforms to present or future investor expectations or objectives for green or sustainable investing. For information on characteristics of a security, use of proceeds, a description of applicable project(s) and/or any other relevant information, please reference the offering documents for such security.

    This document may contain inactive textual addresses to internet websites operated by us and third parties. Reference to such websites is made for information purposes only, and information found at such websites is not incorporated by reference into this document. ING does not make any representation or warranty with respect to the accuracy or completeness of, or take any responsibility for, any information found at any websites operated by third parties. ING specifically disclaims any liability with respect to any information found at websites operated by third parties. ING cannot guarantee that websites operated by third parties remain available following the publication of this document, or that any information found at such websites will not change following the filing of this document. Many of those factors are beyond ING’s control.

    Any forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of ING speak only as of the date they are made, and ING assumes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information or for any other reason.

    This document does not constitute an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to purchase, any securities in the United States or any other jurisdiction.

    Attachment

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI Canada: The CBSA launches an investigation into the alleged dumping of certain carbon and alloy steel wire from the People’s Republic of China, the Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu, the Republic of India, the Italian Republic, the Federation of Malaysia, the Portuguese Republic, the Kingdom of Spain, the Kingdom of Thailand, the Republic of Türkiye, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam

    Source: Government of Canada News

    April 22, 2025
    Ottawa, Ontario

    The Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) announced today that it is initiating an investigation to determine whether certain carbon and alloy steel wire originating in or exported from the People’s Republic of China, the Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu, the Republic of India, the Italian Republic, the Federation of Malaysia, the Portuguese Republic, the Kingdom of Spain, the Kingdom of Thailand, the Republic of Türkiye, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam is being sold at unfair prices in Canada. This practice of dumping goods into Canada can harm Canadian industries by undercutting Canadian prices, which undermines fair competition.

    The CBSA is investigating because of a complaint filed by Sivaco Wire Group 2004, L.P. and ArcelorMittal Long Products Canada G.P. The complainants allege that as a result of an increase in the volume of the dumped imports, they have suffered material injury in the form of price undercutting, price depression, lost sales, lost market share, reduced net income and profitability, reduction in capacity utilization, inability to raise capital for investments, and reduced employment.

    The CBSA and the Canadian International Trade Tribunal (CITT) both play a role in the investigation. The CITT will begin a preliminary inquiry to determine whether the imports are harming Canadian producers and will issue a decision by June 20, 2025. Concurrently, the CBSA will investigate whether the imports are being sold in Canada at unfair prices, and will make a preliminary decision by July 21, 2025.

    Currently, there are 158 special import measures in force in Canada, covering a wide variety of industrial and consumer products. These measures have directly helped to protect approximately 31,000 Canadian jobs and $11.6 billion in Canadian production.

    MIL OSI Canada News

  • MIL-OSI USA: AG Labrador Joins Letter Demanding the Nation’s Leading Companies to Abandon DEI Initiatives

    Source: US State of Idaho

    Home Newsroom AG Labrador Joins Letter Demanding the Nation’s Leading Companies to Abandon DEI Initiatives

    BOISE — Attorney General Raúl Labrador has joined a letter with 14 other attorneys general urging the Business Roundtable, an association of the nation’s leading companies, to abandon their unlawful and misguided DEI initiative. Many of the Roundtable’s members have replaced free-market principles with costly and divisive DEI policies against the guidance of the Supreme Court. 
    The attorneys general argue that the Business Roundtable should prioritize its stated mission of fostering economic growth, job creation, and shareholder returns—not implementing racial quotas and mandatory ideological training. The letter criticizes the group’s shift away from merit-based hiring and warns that such practices are “not only unworkable but also often illegal.”
    “Corporations have an obligation to focus on creating value for their shareholders,” said Attorney General Labrador. “When that duty is replaced with race-based hiring and DEI mandates, it raises serious legal concerns under state and federal law. These companies should return to merit-based practices and sound business judgment. The American people want a return to fairness—where individuals are judged by their abilities, not their immutable characteristics.”
    The letter highlights that members of the Business Roundtable are beginning to recognize that the tide is turning and that these policies are a mistake. A corporation’s true purpose should be to prioritize shareholders and hire based on merit rather than protected characteristics.
    The letter concludes by saying, “It’s time for the Business Roundtable to abandon its redefinition and rededicate itself to merit-based hiring, which supports the actual purpose of a corporation and complies with employment laws. The Business Roundtable’s member CEOs should immediately abandon quotas, targets, racial preferences, and other discriminatory DEI practices. Or face the potential of legal action by state attorneys general.” 
    Attorneys general from Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Mississippi, Montana, North Dakota, Ohio, South Carolina, and South Dakota signed the Missouri–led letter.
    Read more from the Idaho Dispatch here.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: President Meloni’s statement on terrorist attack in Pahalgam in Kashmir

    Source: Government of Italy (English)

    22 Aprile 2025

    I am deeply saddened by the terrorist attack that happened in India today, causing numerous victims. Italy conveys its sympathy to the families affected, to those injured, to the Government and to all Indian people.

    [Courtesy translation]

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: PM meeting with Prime Minister Luxon of New Zealand: 22 April 2025

    Source: United Kingdom – Government Statements

    Press release

    PM meeting with Prime Minister Luxon of New Zealand: 22 April 2025

    The Prime Minister hosted New Zealand Prime Minister Christopher Luxon at Downing Street today.

    The Prime Minister hosted New Zealand Prime Minister Christopher Luxon at Downing Street today.

    The two leaders reflected on their visit to Operation Interflex to see Ukrainian troops being trained earlier today, and the importance of supporting Ukraine for the long term.

    Discussing the Coalition of the Willing, the Prime Minister thanked Prime Minister Luxon for New Zealand’s ongoing support, adding that the planning phase was making good progress across all four domains – land, air, regeneration and sea. 

    The Prime Minister welcomed New Zealand’s recent uplift in defence spending, and both agreed the direct link between defence spending, economic security and putting money back in the pockets of hardworking people.

    Turning to the situation in the Indo-Pacific, the leaders agreed on the importance of working together to support regional stability and counter malign threats.

    They also discussed the strong trade links between the UK and New Zealand, and the UK’s accession to the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership.

    The leaders looked forward to speaking again soon.

    Updates to this page

    Published 22 April 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Defence Secretary Statement to the House of Commons

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Oral statement to Parliament

    Defence Secretary Statement to the House of Commons

    Ukraine Update

    Thank you Mr Speaker. Today, HMS Prince of Wales set sail from Portsmouth and I trust the whole House will join me in wishing the entire carrier strike group a safe and successful global deployment.

    Mr Speaker, I wish to make a statement on the ongoing war in Ukraine.

    Today, parliament returns from its Easter break.

    But during the last two weeks Putin’s illegal invasion of Ukraine has continued. Drones strikes. Missile attacks. Fierce fighting on the frontline.

    On Palm Sunday, men, women and children in Sumy, on their way to church were hit by Putin’s deadliest attack on Ukrainian civilians so far this year, killing 35 people – including young children – and injuring over 100 more.

    We are united in condemnation at this brutal attack and Putin’s illegal actions.

    At this critical moment for Ukraine and for European security, we have stepped up the Government’s efforts for Ukraine and we will step up further, both to increase military support for the fight today and to secure peace for tomorrow.

    Mr Speaker, we cannot jeopardise the peace by forgetting about the war.

    So, ten days ago in Brussels, the UK convened and I co-chaired the 27th meeting of the Ukraine Defence Contact Group, alongside my good friend, the German Defence Minister Boris Pistorius.

    51 nations and partners – from Europe from the Indo Pacific, from South America – came together at NATO HQ, including Ukrainian President Zelensky, US Defence Secretary Hegseth and NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte.

    We came together to step up our support for Ukraine in the fight. Together we pledged a record 21 billion euros of military support to put Ukraine in strongest possible position and to increase pressure on Putin to negotiate.

    Mr Speaker this year, the UK is providing £4.5 billion in military support to Ukraine, more than ever before.

    And in Brussels, I announced £200 million of support will be surged to the front line, with supplies starting to reach Ukraine’s fighters within the next month including radar systems, anti-tank mines and hundreds of thousands of drones.

    I also announced £160 million worth to help the repair and maintenance essential battlefield vehicles and equipment.

    This support will strengthen Ukrainian troops in the close fight now and strengthen our industrial links with Ukraine to boost UK businesses.

    When President Trump talks about peace through strength, it’s the commitments made through this Contact Group that provide the strength to secure that peace.

    Despite President Putin’s promise of a 30-hour pause in fighting, I can confirm that Defence Intelligence have found, and I quote “no indication that a ceasefire on the frontline was observed over the Easter period”.

    And 10,000 missiles and drones have been fired into Ukraine during this year alone, including from the Black Sea.

    So, while Putin has said he declared an Easter truce – he broke it.

    While Putin says he wants peace – he rejected a full ceasefire.

    And while Putin says he wants to put an end to the fighting – he continues to play for time in negotiations.

    And the military, the Russian military continue to press on a number of fronts.

    Mr Speaker, I can confirm Russian military progress is slowing.

    Putin gained less territory in March then he did in February and less territory in February than he did in January.

    Ukrainian towns which Russia have been targeting since before Christmas have still not been captured.

    Ukrainian troops have still not been ejected from Russian territory in Kursk.

    Whatever ground Putin is taking comes at enormous human cost. Over 940,00 Russians have likely been killed or injured in the war so far – including over 150,000 killed and injured this year alone.

    Last month, the average daily casualty rate on the Russian side was 1,300 – almost double the rate of this time last year.

    While at home, Putin faces crippling interest rates at 21 per cent, inflation running at over 10 per cent and the Russian government is spending nearly 40 per cent of its total budget on this military campaign.

    I have to say Mr Speaker, in the days ahead, it is likely that Russia will keep up attacks on the Sumy oblast to help it fully reclaim nearby contested areas of Kursk.

    In central Donetsk oblast, Russia is targeting urban strongholds such as Toretsk, Povrosk and Chasiv Yar. 

    And in Kharkiv, Russia is continuing to make assaults towards the rail and logistics hub of Kupiansk.

    We do expect more ground to be taken, and more Russian missiles fired into Ukraine.

    And that is why we must remain united for Ukraine across this House, across this country, and across those nations standing alongside Ukraine.

    And we will step up support for Ukraine and pressure on Putin to force him to recognise that now is the time for peace, and continuing the war will prove much worse in the long run for Russia.

    Updates to this page

    Published 22 April 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI Global: Trump’s Greenland plan glosses over a history of segregation and discrimination for Indigenous Alaskans

    Source: The Conversation – UK – By Andrew Gawthorpe, Lecturer in History and International Studies, Leiden University

    Donald Trump has wanted America to annex Greenland for a long time. He now has a concrete plan to do it. As reported by the New York Times, the president’s National Security Council has instructed several government departments to get to work on acquiring the island.

    Trump has made it clear that the use of military force remains on the table. But, at least for now, it seems the plan will rely mostly on persuasion.

    The first component is a coordinated advertising and social media campaign aimed at convincing Greenlanders that their future lies under the stars and stripes. The administration plans to tell the island’s residents that they will be more prosperous and more secure as part of the US.

    Driving that message home will be an uphill struggle. A poll in January 2025 found that 85% of Greenlanders oppose the idea of being annexed by the US. A parliamentary election in March also showed little support for it. The best-performing party was the pro-business Demokraatit, which wants to slow walk changes to Greenland’s international status.

    To overcome this resistance, the Trump administration is reportedly planning to appeal to shared ethnic and cultural ties between Inuit Greenlanders, who make up about 88% of the island’s population, and Indigenous peoples in the US state of Alaska. Greenlanders are likely to question that approach for a number of reasons.

    These ties are not completely imaginary. Greenland Inuit are descended from the Thule people, who migrated from Alaska around 1,000 years ago. There are similarities between the languages of Alaskan and Greenland Inuit.

    But these people have been separated by 2,000 miles for centuries, and in the interim have been shaped by their divergent histories. Though their languages are similar, they are generally not mutually intelligible.

    One of the main factors separating Alaskan and Greenland Inuit is their separate colonial histories. Greenland was colonised by Denmark, and Alaska by the US. The details of this colonial history are likely to give Greenlanders pause.

    Alaska became a US state in 1959. Before then, it was a territory – a colonial holding similar to Puerto Rico or Guam today. During its time as a territory, the US government and white settlers treated Alaska’s Indigenous people with a mixture of disinterest and malice.

    Until discrimination was outlawed by a state law in 1945, Indigenous Alaskans lived in a system of segregation and limited rights similar to the “Jim Crow” policies of the southern US. Indigenous Alaskans, like African Americans in the southern states, were not guaranteed the right to vote, and “whites only” signs were commonplace in businesses.

    During the second world war, the US government feared a Japanese attack on the Aleutian islands, which form part of Alaska. As a result, it forcibly evacuated the Indigenous population, burning their villages to prevent invading Japanese troops from using them as housing. Evacuees were forced to live in unsanitary camps on the mainland for years, where more than one in ten died.

    The US government justified this as a geopolitical necessity. But given that great power politics is also behind its drive to control Greenland, the island’s residents should question whether their rights will be respected if they conflict with another perceived geopolitical necessity.

    Buying favour

    Another plank of the Trump administration’s plan is financial. The White House apparently wants to replace the subsidy that Greenland currently receives from Denmark with a payment of US$10,000 (£7,600) per resident. It’s not clear if this money is intended to go directly to the population, or to the island’s central government.

    This works out at just over US$568 million (£429 million) a year. If it’s a subsidy for the central government, then it’s slightly less than the island currently receives from Denmark. And if it’s a payment directly to the population, then it’s unclear how public services on the island would be funded.

    Here again, a look at the experience of Indigenous Alaskans is instructive. Indigenous Alaskans, who receive various US government services through the Bureau of Indian Affairs, have a much higher poverty rate than the general population, lower rates of health coverage and worse educational outcomes.

    They also generally don’t live as long. According to the most recent figures, the life expectancy for Indigenous Alaskans is 70.4 years – much lower than the statewide average of 74.5.

    Economic development – or, perhaps more accurately, exploiting Greenland’s natural resources – is also part of Trump’s plan. Trump is apparently interested in Greenland’s “rare earth minerals, copper, gold, uranium and oil”.

    Greenland does indeed have vast mineral wealth. But it is unclear if it can be safely accessed in the island’s current inhospitable environment.

    Such resource extraction could also easily lead to environmental damage, as it has done in Alaska. In 1989, for example, the Exxon Valdez oil supertanker spilled more than 10 million gallons of crude oil in Alaska’s Prince William Sound.

    Meanwhile, without strong regulation and taxation, the wealth generated could easily accrue to corporations rather than Greenlanders.

    There is a long history of colonising powers claiming that only they, rather than “the natives”, can deliver prosperity and progress to a country. Trump’s plan, which tries to turn the experience of Indigenous Alaskans into one that Greenlanders should want to emulate, fits squarely into this genre.

    But the history of US involvement in Alaska and its treatment of Indigenous Alaskans gives lie to that story. For Greenlanders to trade their sovereignty to the US in return for a guarantee of prosperity and security would be a risky gamble indeed.

    Andrew Gawthorpe does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. Trump’s Greenland plan glosses over a history of segregation and discrimination for Indigenous Alaskans – https://theconversation.com/trumps-greenland-plan-glosses-over-a-history-of-segregation-and-discrimination-for-indigenous-alaskans-254418

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI: Ecobat’s Seculene Sets New Flame-Retardant Standards for Recycled Polypropylene

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    DALLAS, April 22, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Ecobat, a global leader in sustainable energy solutions, today announced that its proprietary Seculene line of high-performance recycled polypropylene (PP) compounds was named a finalist in the prestigious Plastics Recycling Awards Europe (PRAE). The recognition marks a major milestone for Seculene, affirming its role as a trailblazing solution in the circular economy and in advanced polymer engineering.

    Developed in-house by Ecobat and produced entirely from 100% post-consumer waste, Seculene represents a leap forward in recycled plastic technology. With over a decade of expertise behind its development, Seculene has been engineered to rival, and in many cases exceed, the performance of virgin polypropylene—delivering both environmental and functional excellence across demanding industrial applications.

    “Our Seculene polypropylene, derived entirely from post-consumer recycled materials, is a high-quality alternative to virgin polymers,” said Erich Esser, Vice President of Global Polypropylene and Managing Director for Ecobat Resources Germany/Austria. “This achievement reflects years of investment in innovation, resulting in materials that meet the highest industry standards for safety, reliability, and sustainability. Our flame-retardant grades, in particular, represent a new frontier in circular materials technology.”

    Flame-Retardant Innovation That Raises the Bar

    At the heart of Seculene’s PRAE recognition is its flame-retardant variant—the only recycled polypropylene compound certified to UL 94 V0 (Yellow Card) standards. In fire exposure scenarios, this grade forms a protective foam layer that insulates and protects internal components, making it ideal for high-risk environments such as e-bike battery housings and electrical enclosures.

    This advanced fire safety performance, combined with Seculene’s virgin-like density, impact strength, and processability, positions Ecobat at the intersection of circular economy leadership and technical material excellence.

    Automotive-Grade Materials Backed by Industry Validation

    In another major milestone, Ecobat recently secured DBL 1000 approval for its glass-fiber-reinforced Seculene (with 35% glass fiber content), certifying the compound for automotive interior use. A leading German automotive supplier has already adopted this grade for precision control unit housings—validating Seculene’s consistency and structural integrity under real-world manufacturing conditions.

    This recognition underscores the growing demand for high-performance, sustainable alternatives in the automotive sector, where lightweighting, durability, and environmental accountability are increasingly essential.

    Built for Versatility and Circularity

    Seculene is available in over 30 specialized grades tailored to a wide range of use cases—from UV-stabilized components for outdoor applications to mineral-filled variants designed for increased rigidity. Engineered for injection molding, extrusion, and other processing techniques, Seculene enables seamless integration into modern manufacturing environments.

    Use cases span automotive parts (wheel arch liners, cable conduits), electrical components, industrial systems, and consumer goods—making it one of the most versatile recycled polypropylene lines available on the market today.

    Every Seculene batch is manufactured at Ecobat’s recycling facilities, where closed-loop systems minimize waste and reduce energy use. These plants employ rigorous sorting, cleaning, and compounding processes to ensure material purity, consistent melt flow rates, and mechanical properties that meet or exceed industry benchmarks.

    Driving Toward a Circular Future

    The recognition by PRAE not only affirms the quality and innovation of Seculene, but also highlights Ecobat’s broader mission to lead the global transition to a circular economy. By replacing virgin polymers with 100% recycled alternatives, Seculene significantly reduces the environmental footprint of plastic-intensive industries while enabling compliance with rising regulatory and sustainability demands.

    About Ecobat
    With operations throughout Europe and the United States, Ecobat is a leader in the collection, recycling, production and distribution of energy storage solutions, lead and polypropylene products. Ecobat is now applying its global capability, infrastructure, and market knowledge towards recycling lithium-ion battery materials. For more information on how we are transforming energy storage, visit www.ecobat.com.

    Media Contact:
    Chelsey Berend
    Press@Ecobat.com  
    1-888-317-4687 ext. 703

    Photos accompanying this announcement are available at

    https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/4e61f4d9-c65c-48e8-98e2-fbec8c0acdf2

    https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/fe4dfdec-0ee5-42b7-8f6a-64d8d2eefa31

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI Security: Operators of New Jersey Company Sentenced to Prison and Enter Into Related Civil Settlement Agreement for Roles in $127 Million Health Care Fraud and Kickback Scheme

    Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) State Crime Alerts (c)

    NEWARK, N.J. – Two operators of a New Jersey marketing company were sentenced to prison for their roles in conspiracies to commit health care fraud and to pay and receive illegal kickbacks, United States Attorney Alina Habba announced.

    Eric Karlewicz a/k/a “Anthony Mazza,” 46, of Rockland County, New York, and Nicco Romanowski, 33, of Roswell, Georgia, were sentenced by U.S. District Judge Esther Salas in Newark federal court following their guilty pleas to Informations charging conspiracy to violate the Federal Anti-Kickback statute and conspiracy to commit health care fraud.  Karlewicz was sentenced to 51 months in prison and Romanowski was sentenced to 80 months in prison.

    According to documents filed in this case and statements made in court:

    From in or around June 2017 through in or around May 2019, Karlewicz and Romanowski participated in a scheme with durable medical equipment (“DME”) companies, telemedicine companies, and doctors to submit false claims to health care benefit programs, including Medicare and TRICARE, based on a circular scheme of kickbacks and bribes.  Karlewicz and Romanowski controlled a New Jersey-based marketing company, Empire Pain Center Holdings LLC (“Empire”), though which they and their co-conspirators identified Medicare and TRICARE beneficiaries to target.  Employees of Empire called the beneficiaries to pressure them to agree to accept DME, frequently consisting of back, shoulder, and knee braces. Karlewicz and Romanowski paid Empire’s employees commissions, bonuses, and incentives to encourage them to convince as many beneficiaries as possible to accept DME, regardless of medical necessity.

    Karlewicz and Romanowski, through Empire, then paid kickbacks to telemedicine companies, which in turn paid kickbacks to doctors in exchange for prescriptions for the DME. As agreed upon, the doctors signed the prescription orders regardless of medical necessity, often without ever speaking to the patient.  Karlewicz and Romanowski distributed the prescriptions to DME suppliers around the country, with which Empire had additional kickback arrangements. These DME suppliers submitted claims for reimbursement to health care benefit programs including Medicare and TRICARE, and thereafter sent a portion of the proceeds to Empire as payment for the doctor’s orders generated through the conspiracy.  Empire received more than $63 million from DME suppliers in exchange for the referrals. 

    In total, Karlewicz and Romanowski caused the submission of false and fraudulent claims to health care benefit programs totaling in excess of $127 million for DME.  Using proceeds from the scheme, Karlewicz and Romanowski purchased luxury vehicles, including a Ferrari, and Lamborghini, a Bentley, and a BMW.

    In addition to the prison terms, Judge Salas sentenced each defendant to three years of supervised release and ordered them to pay $127,600,000 in restitution.  Karlewicz was ordered to forfeit over $63 million, and Romanowski was ordered to forfeit over $5.5 million.

    United States Attorney Habba also announced that Karlewicz and Empire entered into a civil settlement agreement. As part of that civil settlement agreement, Karlewicz and Empire admitted to violating the False Claims Act and agreed to the entry of a consent judgment against them in the amount of $63.8 million.

    The civil settlement agreement resolves a lawsuit filed under the whistleblower provision of the False Claims Act, which permits private parties, called relators, to file suit on behalf of the United States for false claims and share in a portion of the government’s recovery. The relator, Robert Jackson Tyler, Jr., will receive a share of the funds recovered by the United States pursuant to the False Claims Act.

    United States Attorney Habba credited special agents of the FBI, under the direction of Acting Special Agent in Charge Terence G. Reilly in Newark, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General, under the direction of Special Agent in Charge Naomi Gruchacz, and U.S. Department of Defense, Office of Inspector General, Defense Criminal Investigative Service, Northeast Field Office, under the direction of Acting Special Agent in Charge Christopher Silvestro, with the investigation.

    The government is represented in the criminal case by Assistant U.S. Attorney Katherine M. Romano of the Health Care Fraud Unit and Senior Trial Counsel Barbara Ward of the Bank Integrity, Recovery, and Money Laundering Unit in Newark.

    The government is represented in the civil case by Assistant U.S. Attorney David V. Simunovich of the Health Care Fraud Unit and Trial Attorney Martha Glover of U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Fraud Section. 

                                                                           ###

    Defense counsel: Darren Gelber, Esq. (for Eric Karlewicz)

                                Alyssa Cimino, Esq. (for Nicco Romanowski)

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Economics: A father’s quest for diagnosis inspired a disruptive AI solution

    Source: Microsoft

    Headline: A father’s quest for diagnosis inspired a disruptive AI solution

    After the diagnosis, Isla quickly became one of Spain’s main advocates for rare diseases, championing better understanding and fighting for improved treatments for these little-known illnesses. As the years passed, he realized that computing could be a perfect ally, given that diagnosing rare diseases requires gathering and analyzing vast amounts of data and symptom information.  

    “AI is a facilitator,” Isla says, reflecting on what he calls “the odyssey of diagnosis.”  

    In 2017, when Sergio was 9 years old, Isla co-founded Foundation 29, a nonprofit organization dedicated to leveraging AI for healthcare innovation. That same year, Isla forged a momentous, if improbable, connection with Satya Nadella, Microsoft Chairman and CEO. 

    At a Microsoft event, Nadella shared the story of his son, who was born with cerebral palsy, and how technology could assist those with special needs. Isla, watching online, was deeply moved. 

    Isla immediately wrote to Nadella, explaining how his son’s disease had also profoundly changed his life. 

    “I want to provide diagnoses for those without one. It’s achievable. Microsoft has the technology to make it happen,” Isla wrote in his email. Nadella responded within five minutes, connecting Isla with Microsoft teams focused on AI-driven healthcare solutions. 

    MIL OSI Economics

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Additional support provided for Middle East appeal

    Source: Scottish Government

    First Minister announces boost for humanitarian aid.

    First Minister John Swinney has announced an additional £300,000 funding will be provided to support humanitarian aid efforts in the Middle East through the Disasters Emergency Committee (DEC) Appeal and Scottish charities, SCIAF and Mercy Corps.

    This funding, delivered through the Scottish Government’s Humanitarian Emergency Fund programme, will help provide urgent assistance to those affected by the ongoing conflict, including food, clean water, medical care, and shelter for displaced individuals in Gaza, the West Bank, Lebanon and Syria.

    The announcement was made by the First Minister during a parliamentary debate on the international situation in which he also called for Scotland to champion the benefits of international trade, cooperation, and solidarity during this period of international turbulence.

    The First Minister said:

    “I’m pleased to announce a contribution of £240,000 through our Humanitarian Emergency Fund to the Disasters Emergency Committee’s appeal for the Middle East, along with £30,000 each for Scottish charities, SCIAF and Mercy Corps for their responses in Lebanon and Syria.

    “This is in addition to the £250,000 that we provided to this appeal last November and comes at a time when humanitarian needs continue to increase across Gaza, the West Bank, Lebanon and Syria.

    “I believe that wherever we can, we do what is within our power to de-escalate and support recovery from disaster and conflict in our deeply interconnected world.

    “Investing in the wellbeing of the international community is also an investment in our national wellbeing and security and I make no apology for doing so in these turbulent times.”

    The First Minister added:

    “At a time when the US, the UK and other donors have slashed their aid budgets, we in Scotland are committed to continuing to support our Global South partner countries, and more widely to responding to humanitarian emergencies globally.

    “Though we recognise the amounts Scotland contributes may be small in the face of growing need, we will do all we can to ensure it has maximum impact. Scotland will continue to act as a good global citizen.”

    DEC spokesperson Huw Owen said: “This additional donation to the DEC Middle East Humanitarian Appeal from the Scottish Government through its Humanitarian Emergency fund is hugely welcome. 

    “The Appeal has now raised close to £4 million here in Scotland, over £45 million UK wide, which also includes many generous individual donations from the public.  We are hugely grateful for this support.

    “It will bolster DEC charities and their expert local partners’ continuing efforts in Gaza and the wider region, working in incredibly challenging circumstances, to reach the most affected communities with medical care, food and clean water as well as psychological support for traumatised children and their families.”

    Background:

    Humanitarian needs across the Middle East continue to escalate, with nearly half of the population of Gaza facing emergency levels of food insecurity and water, shelter and medicine in desperately short supply. By providing this funding, the DEC and its member charities can ensure that when the current blockade of Gaza is finally lifted, those needs can be addressed without delay.

    The DEC appeal for the Middle East launched on 17 October 2024 and the Scottish Government’s previous contribution of £250,000 supported DEC and partner organisations in delivering humanitarian aid across the region.

    Since the appeal’s launch, generous donations from the public have helped deliver lifesaving assistance, and further contributions remain essential to sustain these efforts. The appeal has raised £3.8m in Scotland and the Scottish public can make a donation at Donate to Middle East Appeal | Disasters Emergency Committee

    MIL OSI United Kingdom