NewzIntel.com

Category: Europe

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Request for financial transparency and a simulation incorporating off-budget appropriations into the 2025 EU budget – E-003011/2024(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    As indicated in the Commission’s reply to ‘Recommendation 2 — Compile and publish information on the EU’s overall financial landscape’[1] which was partially accepted by the Commission, the Commission provides comprehensive information, in accordance with the Financial Regulation[2], on the implementation of the budget and instruments for which the Commission is accountable in a number of reports, such as: the EU consolidated Annual Accounts, the Annual Management and Performance Report (AMPR), working documents attached to the draft budget in accordance with Article 41 of the Financial Regulation and the report prepared based on Article 256 of the Financial Regulation on financial instruments, budgetary guarantees, financial assistance and contingent liabilities.

    In addition, the Commission compiles, in line with Article 16 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 16 December 2020[3], an annual report, covering some instruments which are outside the Commission’s remit of reporting, and based on publicly available information[4].

    Instruments which are outside the scope of the EU budget, or which do not enter in the accounts of the EU, or, for some, are outside the Treaties, or for which there is no publicly available document, do not fall within the remit of the Commission’s powers to implement the EU budget and are therefore of a very different nature.

    Due to the different logic of such instruments which are outside of the budget, the Commission has not carried out a simulation as referred to by the Honourable Member.

    • [1] https://www.eca.europa.eu/Lists/ECAReplies/COM-Replies-SR-23-05/COM-Replies-SR-23-05_EN.pdf
    • [2] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32018R1046
    • [3] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32020Q1222(01)
    • [4] https://commission.europa.eu/publications/2023-budgetary-transparency-report_en
    Last updated: 9 April 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Status of the review of free-to-air sporting events of national interest – E-000758/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    According to the Audiovisual Media Services Directive[1], Member States should be able to take measures to protect the right to information and to ensure wide access by the public to television coverage of national or non-national events of major importance for society.

    To this end, each Member State may draw up a list of designated events, national or non-national, which it considers to be of major importance for society.

    Member States need to notify such lists of major events to the Commission, in accordance with Article 14(2) of the directive, when they want to obtain mutual recognition from other Member States for the listed events.

    Informal contacts between the Commission and the Italian authorities on the update of the list of events of major importance for society started in July 2024.

    The purpose of those contacts is to ensure the completeness of the eventual formal notification by the Italian authorities, taking into account the criteria for including events on the list and the need for an in-depth justification for the listed events. The informal contacts went on until March 2025.

    The Commission will duly proceed as soon as the formal notification from the Italian authorities is received. Within a period of three months from the notification, the Commission shall verify that the proposed measures are compatible with EU law and communicate them to the other Member States. It shall seek the opinion of the contact committee established pursuant to Article 29 of the Audiovisual Media Services Directive.

    • [1] Directive 2010/13/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 March 2010 on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the provision of audiovisual media services (Audiovisual Media Services Directive) (Codified version) (OJ L 95, 15.4.2010, p. 1, ELI: https://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2010/13/oj). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:02010L0013-20181218
    Last updated: 9 April 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Persons with disabilities in the occupied Palestinian territories – E-000618/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission is committed to ensuring that Palestinians, including those with disabilities, receive the humanitarian assistance they need.

    The Commission works closely with trusted humanitarian partners to ensure that aid reaches those most in need, including persons with disabilities. Commission experts monitor the situation and engage with partners, such as Palestinian civil society organisations, to assess needs.

    In 2024, the Commission notably funded the organisation Humanity & Inclusion to ensure that children have access to safe and quality inclusive education and to provide assistive technologies, rehabilitation services and medical assistance to children with disabilities .

    Since the beginning of the crisis, the Commission has allocated some EUR 450 million to support the humanitarian response, providing persons with disabilities inclusive and accessible assistance.

    When it comes to return and reconstruction, humanitarian actors stand ready to assist people with emergency and early recovery assistance and to ensure the specific needs of persons with disabilities are duly taken into account.

    In order to support the ceasefire in Gaza, the EU’s civilian Border Assistance Mission for the Rafah Crossing Point (EUBAM Rafah) continues to be operational, allowing for the movement of individuals out of Gaza, including some who require medical treatment.

    The Commission also uses its convening power to sensitise other donors to important issues such as disability inclusion. The Commission exchanges closely with Organisations of Persons with Disabilities (OPDs) at global level and encourages partners to pursue dialogues with local OPDs, in line with the Commission’s localisation guidance.

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – The first General-Purpose Artificial Intelligence (GPAI) Code of Practice: Appointment of Chairs and Vice-Chairs – E-002787/2024(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Code of Practice on general-purpose Artificial Intelligence (AI) models will set out commitments to which providers of such models may voluntarily adhere to ensure their compliance with the relevant provisions under the AI Act[1]. Article 56(9) of the AI Act provides that the Code must be completed no later than 2 May 2025.

    The AI Office has facilitated the drawing-up of the Code. It published an expression of interest inviting academics and other independent experts to apply for the role of Chairs by August 2024 and it selected and appointed 13 such Chairs and Vice-Chairs in September 2024 based on their expertise, ability to effectively fulfil the role and the tasks, and independence, while aiming to ensure geographical diversity and gender balance.

    Internationally recognised expertise played an important role in the selection procedure and was taken into account through inter alia the applicants’ professional experience, publications, academic qualifications, faculty appointments or research projects.

    The process of drawing-up the Code was designed by the AI Office to be as inclusive and transparent as possible. It is an iterative approach that includes four drafting rounds accompanied by working group meetings, mindful of the legal deadlines.

    For each draft, stakeholders have at least two weeks to submit their comments in writing. Chairs and Vice-Chairs are given sufficient time to synthesise feedback and to write the next iteration of the Code.

    The AI Office is supporting the Chairs and Vice-Chairs by ensuring compliance with the legal framework. If a Code cannot be finalised, or if the AI Office deems it is not adequate, the Commission may provide, by means of implementing acts, common rules for the implementation of the obligations.

    • [1] Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence and amending Regulations (EC) No 300/2008, (EU) No 167/2013, (EU) No 168/2013, (EU) 2018/858, (EU) 2018/1139 and (EU) 2019/2144 and Directives 2014/90/EU, (EU) 2016/797 and (EU) 2020/1828 (Artificial Intelligence Act), OJ L, 2024/1689.
    Last updated: 9 April 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – The online promotion of crypto-assets by Elon Musk in relation to the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) – E-000057/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA)[1] Regulation on the prevention and prohibition of market abuse involving crypto-assets, applies to acts carried out by any person concerning crypto-assets that are admitted to trading or in respect of which an admission to trading on a crypto-asset platform has been made, in the EU (Article 86).

    Provided Mr Musk’s actions refer to crypto-assets admitted to trading or a request for admission has been made in the EU, Article 91(2)(c) which prescribes that no person shall engage in or attempt to engage in market manipulation, including the dissemination of information through the media would apply.

    The supervision and enforcement of the MiCA Regulation is the competence of the national competent authorities. The national competent authorities have the power to investigate and impose any appropriate sanction for actions that are found to be in violation of the provisions of the MiCA Regulation, including the provisions for the prevention of market abuse.

    The Commission is scheduled to review the MiCA Regulation at regular intervals. Article 140 lists all the areas that the review will cover, including the functioning of markets in crypto-assets in the EU and any market developments and trends, therefore possibly covering indirectly international developments that may affect crypto-asset markets.

    • [1] OJ L 150, 9.6.2023, p. 40-205.
    Last updated: 9 April 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Thierry Breton’s appointment to the Bank of America advisory council – E-000275/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    1. The Commission’s assessment of the former Commissioner for the internal market Thierry Breton’s envisaged post term of office activity as member of the Global Advisory Council of the Bank of America followed the procedure laid down in Article 11(2) of the Code of Conduct for the Members of the Commission. In line with this provision, the Independent Ethical Committee delivered its opinion, upon which the Commission built its decision[1]. Both the opinion and the Commission’s decision are available on the website ‘Former European Commissioners’ authorised occupations[2].

    2. Public trust in the Commission’s independence is of paramount importance. Former Commissioners’ post term of office activities are assessed against the framework of the Treaties, namely Articles 245 and 339 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and of the Code of Conduct for the Members of the Commission. Their post term of office activities eventually authorised by the Commission do not impact the way the serving Members of the Commission abide by the obligations that apply to them.

    3. The Commission’s rules and procedures in force are designed to ensure the integrity of the Members and former Members of the Commission and the appropriate transparency. The Commission is determined to keep its ethical standards, rules and procedures up to the highest level of comparable institutions. The Commission considers that the rules and procedures contained in the current version of the Code of Conduct for the Members of the Commission ensure this high level of integrity.

    • [1] Decision C(2025) 9000 of 15 January 2020: https://commission.europa.eu/document/download/fad11e85-55ec-42b0-a145-7fc3387107a9_en?filename=c-2025-9000-en.pdf and the corresponding opinion of the Independent Ethical Committee, of 12 December 2024: https://commission.europa.eu/document/download/f6c6e1bf-495d-4ad3-ab0b-e68db63bcc63_en?filename=opinion-of-the-iec-former-commissioner-breton-bank-of-america-en.pdf
    • [2] https://commission.europa.eu/about/service-standards-and-principles/ethics-and-good-administration/commissioners-and-ethics/former-european-commissioners-authorised-occupations_en
    Last updated: 9 April 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Scrutinising the declarations of interests made by Commissioners-designate – E-002391/2024(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission follows the current rules, processes, and requirements for the Declarations of Interests (DoI) of Commissioners-designate, as set out in the Code of Conduct for Members of the Commission. In accordance with Article 3(2) of the Code, candidates for President of the Commission and Commissioners-designate must submit their declarations to the European Parliament in due time to allow for parliamentary examination.

    These declarations, which are made public in an electronic format, ensure transparency and accountability throughout the appointment process.

    The Commission is dedicated to promoting transparency, accountability, and trust within the EU’s institutions. Another cornerstone of this effort is the establishment of the Interinstitutional EU Ethics Body, which will bring together representatives from currently eight participating EU institutions and bodies.

    This Body aims to establish common minimum standards, potentially also harmonising Members’ declarations of financial or non-financial interests across participating parties.

    Such a unified approach could further enhance the meaningfulness of these declarations, strengthen public confidence, and respect the diversity of the participating institutions and bodies.

    The Commission remains actively engaged in this initiative, working towards a robust and transparent framework that upholds the integrity of EU governance.

    Through its participation in the EU Ethics Body, the Commission will contribute to reviewing best practices and exploring opportunities for further alignment of standards across institutions.

    Last updated: 9 April 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Small regional airports across the European Union – E-000738/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission is currently reviewing the 2014 guidelines on state aid to airports and airlines (Aviation Guidelines)[1]. It has carried out stakeholder consultations[2] and launched an external support study to be finalised in 2025.

    The objective is to adopt the new rules before April 2027 and stakeholders will have the chance to comment on the draft guidelines before that date.

    The revision of the Aviation Guidelines will consider connectivity needs of Member States as well as the need to decarbonise the aviation sector.

    At this moment, it appears too early to anticipate about the content of the new rules. In that regard, while the Commission acknowledges that regional airports may contribute to connectivity (and thus social and territorial cohesion of the Union), it notes at the same time that operating aid is one of the most distortive forms of public support, which is why the current Aviation Guidelines foresee the phase-out of operating aid to regional airports by 3 April 2027.

    Considering the sectorial developments since 2014, the Commission will assess whether and under which conditions start-up aid to airlines and operating aid to regional airports (including those with up to one million passengers per year) could be maintained.

    • [1] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=planjo:20140328-018
    • [2] https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/have-your-say/initiatives/13915-State-aid-in-the-aviation-sector-Commission-guidelines-on-airports-and-airlines-revision-_en
    Last updated: 9 April 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – EU Ombudsman inquiry regarding the respect for human rights in the context of the EU-Tunisia Memorandum of Understanding – E-000062/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    On 18 February 2025, the Commission replied to the European Ombudsman by providing further clarifications on several elements of compliance with its human rights obligations.

    Concerning the possible suspension of contracts, the General Conditions for Contribution Agreements (Articles 11 and 12[1]) stipulate that the implementation may be suspended when a violation of human rights in the respective partner country has been identified per a formal EU decision. Suspension can be partial and is not the only means to address a potential breach.

    This can also be done by reinforcing dialogue with the authorities and taking mitigating measures, including trainings on international law and human rights.

    The Commission is working on enhancing internal procedures to ensure better mainstreaming of human rights in migration management and more effectively follow up on allegations of human rights violations.

    The Commission has strong monitoring mechanisms in place. Implementing partners conduct risk and context analysis and identify preventive measures to mitigate the risk that EU assistance results in violation of human rights.

    The EU Delegation also monitors the situation through regular missions, meetings and policy dialogue with relevant stakeholders, including Tunisian authorities and internal security forces.

    The latter assured that appropriate procedures are in place to address any instances of mistreatment or misconduct. Moreover, dedicated monitoring mechanisms have been deployed to further ensure adherence to human rights’ standards in EU funded projects related to migration and security. All this information serves as basis for dialogue with the authorities and guide the implementation of EU actions.

    The Commission is committed to the respect of human rights and attaches great importance to transparency and accountability and remains fully committed to engaging with the European Parliament on its activities in Tunisia.

    • [1]  https://international-partnerships.ec.europa.eu/document/download/005e7241-6726-4c5e-b822-3b51c28a8819_en?filename=contribution-agreement-annex-ii_en.pdf
    Last updated: 9 April 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Quality of impact assessments – E-000184/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    1. The Commission’s Better Regulation system relies on a process, which encompasses the intervention of the Regulatory Scrutiny Board (RSB). The scores quoted in the question refer to the initial impact assessment reports as first submitted to the RSB. It shows that 60% of initial impact assessments have sufficient quality already at first submission. The remaining 40% require further work and will be resubmitted for another round of scrutiny. Once the recommendations of the RSB have been addressed, all final impact assessments have the necessary level of quality.

    2. The Commission has developed appropriate guidance and training programmes for policy officers conducting impact assessments. The Commission’s ‘better regulation’ policy is one of the most comprehensive regulatory policy among the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development and EU countries and it keeps expanding with new elements. Even in cases where the average score for initial impact assessments is not yet ‘acceptable’, once the RSB’s recommendations in their final positive opinion are addressed, the final impact assessments always have an ‘acceptable’ score.

    3. The Commission seeks to continuously improve the quality of impact assessments supporting the political decision-making. This is why there is quality control carried out by the RSB. This quality control is successful, as between 2020 and 2023, all final impact assessments that accompany policy proposals have on average a quality score above ‘acceptable’. That is the only relevant ‘target’ for the Commission’s impact assessments.

    Last updated: 9 April 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Requests by former Members of the Commission to engage in professional activities – E-000207/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    Several former Members of the Von der Leyen I Commission have indeed notified envisaged post term of office activities, taking into account the end of their Commission office.

    he Commission does not provide information on ongoing assessment procedures regarding the compatibility with Article 245 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union of their envisaged post term of office activities.

    The decisions adopted by the Commission, together with the corresponding opinions from the Independent Ethical Committee, when those opinions are requested pursuant to Article 11(3) of the Code of Conduct for the Members of the European Commission[1], are available on the dedicated website[2].

    • [1] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv%3AOJ.C_.2018.065.01.0007.01.ENG&toc=OJ%3AC%3A2018%3A065%3ATOC
    • [2] https://commission.europa.eu/about/service-standards-and-principles/ethics-and-good-administration/commissioners-and-ethics/former-european-commissioners-authorised-occupations_en
    Last updated: 9 April 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Managing conflicts of interest in the EU institutions: the case of Henrik Hololei and Qatar – P-002582/2024(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    1. The Commission received the case of Mr Hololei further to an investigation by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF). This investigation is now completed. OLAF has not found evidence of criminal conduct. It did gather elements indicating a breach of professional obligations. The Commission received a recommendation from OLAF for a follow-up under the EU Staff Regulations (SR). The competent services are following up[1].

    2. The Commission works under the assumption that the co-legislators will reach an agreement in 2025 on the proposed Directive on combatting corruption, which aims to equip national authorities with enhanced tools to fight and prevent corruption. The Commission will assist Member States with its implementation. EU officials and agents are subject to the SR adopted by the European Parliament and Council, which provide for a comprehensive legal framework prohibiting and sanctioning all forms of unethical behavior, including but not limited to those outlined in the draft Directive. The directive on combatting corruption will be addressed to all Member States hosting EU institutions.

    3. The EU-Qatar air transport agreement was negotiated at the request of Member States and EU stakeholders. The negotiations were conducted in a fully transparent manner with the close involvement of Member States representatives and EU stakeholders. The outcome of the negotiations was endorsed unanimously by all Member States that considered it fully responded to the negotiating directives adopted by the Council. The agreement was then signed by all Member States and the EU. The Commission considers that potential breaches of professional obligations by the then Director-General should not result in a suspension of the application of the agreement.

    • [1] During any disciplinary procedure, the persons concerned enjoy the presumption of innocence.
    Last updated: 9 April 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Functioning of the European Schools – E-000433/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    1. The Board of Governors (BoG), the top decision-making body of the European Schools (ES), addressed the Parliament’s resolution with an Action Plan, adopted in April 2024. This plan is available on the website of the Office of the Secretary-General of the European Schools[1]. Its actions are currently being implemented according to the agreed schedule. Bruxelles-Argenteuil is currently the only accredited European School (AES) in the Brussels area. If Belgian authorities request accreditation for more schools, the Commission will explore signing new contribution agreements.

    2. The EU’s financial contribution is adjusted annually to support the expanding ES population and needs. The draft budget for 2026 was discussed in the ES Budgetary Committee on 12-13 March 2025 and will be submitted for a decision of the BoG in early April 2025.

    3. The host country is responsible for the 5th Brussels-based European school in Neder-Over-Heembeek (ESB5). Initially set for 2028, its opening has been deferred to 2030. Belgian authorities plan to expand ESB2, Woluwe site, to accommodate an additional 200-300 pupils to manage the growing Brussels ES population until ESB5 opens. According to the BoG decision of December 2022, the new ESB5 should have five language sections: French, Dutch and Italian (relocated from ESB4, Laeken), Greek (relocation of satellite classes from ESB1, Berkendael site), and, if justified by pupil numbers, English.

    • [1] https://www.eursc.eu/Documents/2024-01-D-30-en-4.pdf
    Last updated: 9 April 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Urgent need to address violence against Christian communities in the Democratic Republic of Congo – E-000879/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    1. Protecting civilians, ending the violence and tackling the drivers of conflict in Eastern Congo requires a holistic response by the region as a whole. The EU is contributing by strengthening the Congolese security and law enforcement apparatus, supporting local and regional conflict mediation initiatives as well as activities aimed at tackling hate speech and extremism. The Allied Democratic Forces as a group and several of its senior leaders are subject to United Nations (UN) sanctions. One of its senior leaders is also subject to EU restrictive measures.

    2. The EU has been actively supporting, publicly and diplomatically, the African-led Luanda and the Nairobi processes. It has recently intensified its outreach to key actors in the region, with calls and meetings involving the President of the European Council, the EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and the EU Special Representative for the Great Lakes region. It will continue to do so.

    3. The EU has been extremely active in the provision of humanitarian aid to the populations in need in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). It has already made available EUR 60 million for the humanitarian response in country in 2025, in addition to financing humanitarian aid flights transporting cargo and humanitarian workers in the country and humanitarian advocacy efforts. The EU has supported and welcomed the decision by the UN Human Rights Council of 7 February 2025 to establish an independent fact-finding mission on the serious human rights violations and violations of international humanitarian law committed in North Kivu and South Kivu, in the eastern DRC, to be followed by an independent commission of inquiry.

    Last updated: 9 April 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Anti-dumping duties on Chinese lysine – E-000457/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission is aware of the concerns regarding a reliable supply of lysine to the EU market and its importance as essential amino acid to complement the diets of farmed animals.

    It was established during the investigation that the EU producer is currently able to supply about 20% of the EU market under the normal conditions of competition, whilst large volumes are still sourced from third countries other than China (Indonesia, United States, South Korea, Brazil).

    The overwhelming and further increasing presence of Chinese imports on the EU market made it impossible for the EU industry to increase its production capacity.

    The Commission explained in Regulation 2025/74 of 13 January 2025[1] that the purpose of anti-dumping duties is not to close the EU market for imports from China, but rather to tackle unfair market practices and restore the level playing field, precisely allowing for the normal functioning of the market.

    Lysine and other feed additives do not fall under the definition of raw material[2] as laid in Regulation 2024/1252 and could therefore not be classified as such. Furthermore, actions that are applicable to critical raw materials would not address the concerns discussed.

    In the EU interest analysis, the Commission has provisionally concluded that the imposition of any anti-dumping measures is unlikely to seriously affect the situation of the users.

    The investigation has now entered its second phase, in which the Commission will analyse the comments provided by interested parties and may amend its determinations accordingly, if needed.

    The impact of measures on the feed industry will thus be further analysed. So far, the Commission has reasonable grounds to ascertain itself that no shortage of supply will occur in the future.

    • [1] ELI:  http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg_impl/2025/74/oj
    • [2] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:02024R1252-20240503#art_2
    Last updated: 9 April 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Development of transport infrastructure in Syria – E-000307/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The EU stands ready to support the new phase in Syria through a Syrian-led and Syrian-owned peaceful and inclusive transition, grounded on human rights and international law.

    Coordination with all external actors and regional partners, including Türkiye, to reunite and rebuild Syria, in full respect of its sovereignty, unity, and territorial integrity will be a crucial element.

    The recovery and reconstruction of Syria, in which the EU aims to actively engage, is a field where Türkiye plays a key role. It is therefore important that there is good cooperation and coordination between the EU and Türkiye.

    The EU intends to scale up its recovery efforts and support eventual reconstruction of Syria, provided that an inclusive transition continues. The EU’s approach will be gradual and proportionate to the steps taken by the interim authorities.

    The EU decided to suspend several restrictive measures on 24 February 2025 to facilitate engagement with Syria, its people and businesses, in energy and transport sectors, as well as to facilitate financial and banking transactions associated with such sectors and those needed for humanitarian and reconstruction purposes .

    The sanctions relief is gradual, conditional and reversible. The EU is regularly assessing if the conditions in Syria allow for further suspensions.

    Since 2011, the EU has been at the forefront of international efforts to support Syria. From 2011 until December 2024, the EU and Member States have mobilised over EUR 37 billion in support of the Syrian people and their host communities.

    The EU has organised the ninth edition of the Brussels Conference on 17 March 2025 to mobilise international support to help address Syria’s immediate needs, recovery and early stages of reconstruction, where the EU committed nearly EUR 2.5 billion for 2025 and 2026, while together with partners EUR 5.8 billion was pledged overall.

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Increased military spending in the EU: balance between strategic autonomy and NATO cooperation – E-000756/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The EU remains a project for peace. At a time when the EU is facing war in Ukraine, to prepare for current and future threats and challenges, the EU needs to assume greater responsibility for its own defence, enhance its defence readiness and safeguard its sovereignty.

    To do so, the EU and its Member States agree that defence spending will be regularly increased in real terms to match the collective ambition in defence.

    Today, the twenty-three Member States that are also North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) Allies, all together are spending 2% of gross domestic product on defence.

    On 4 March 2025, the President of the Commission announced the ReArm Europe plan[1], which can generate up to EUR 800 billion in additional defence expenditure. The EU can support Member States in fulfilling their national and international commitments (including NATO’s).

    There is no competition: a stronger EU defence will make NATO stronger. Spending more, together and European on defence will allow a more effective, resilient and balanced approach to European security policy. It will enable those Member States in the Alliance, to act more effectively within NATO or autonomously, including within the EU.

    The ReArm Europe plan aims primarily at giving Member States more fiscal space for defence spending, through the activation of the National Escape Clause under the Stability and Growth Pact, providing EUR 150 billion in loans to Member States for defence investments (through a new instrument Security Action for Europe — SAFE), and mobilising private capital.

    By investing in the European Defence Technological and Industrial Base, Member States can boost job creation, research, and technological innovation within Europe, thereby fostering competitiveness and economic growth.

    Efficient use of resources by enhancing cooperation and channelling the resources into commonly identified capability gaps can also help free up funds for other strategic priorities.

    • [1] https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/api/files/document/print/sv/statement_25_673/STATEMENT_25_673_EN.pdf

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Cooperating with third countries in alerts pursuant to Article 36 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 (SIS II) – E-002956/2024(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    1. The Commission considers ‘priority third parties’ as the parties for which the Council has authorised the Commission, as Union negotiator, to open negotiations and adopted negotiating directives for international agreements to be concluded between the Union and third parties on exchange of personal data with Europol[1].

    2. In accordance with Article 23(5) of Regulation (EU) 2016/794[2], regardless of an international agreement enabling the exchange of personal data being in place, and while upholding all provisions on ownership and data protection as well as necessity and proportionality, Europol may receive personal data from third countries.

    According to Regulation (EU) 2018/1862[3], only the competent authorities of Member States can enter, modify or delete alerts in Schengen Information System (SIS), in line with the requirements and conditions set out in that regulation, including when the underlying case for the alert is partially or fully based on information received from third parties. There is no obligation or procedure for the alert issuing Member State to inform other Member States or Europol on the source of information.

    3. The Commission has no access to data in the SIS and no access to information on specific cases of bilateral information exchange between Europol and third countries on hit information. Pursuant to Article 48(4) of Regulation (EU) 2018/1862, Europol shall only communicate such information to third countries with the consent of the alert issuing Member State and in full compliance with EU law on data protection.

    • [1] The countries for which the Council has authorised the Commission to open negotiations for an agreement on the exchange of personal data are: Algeria, Egypt, Jordan, Israel, Lebanon, Morocco, Tunisia, and Türkiye (all in 2018), New Zealand (the only one -that so far entered into application on 15 August 2024), and Bolivia, Brazil, Ecuador, Mexico, and Peru (negotiations with Brazil were concluded and on 18 December 2024 the Commission adopted the proposals to sign and conclude the Agreement).
    • [2] Regulation (EU) 2016/794 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2016 on the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) and replacing and repealing Council Decisions 2009/371/JHA, 2009/934/JHA, 2009/935/JHA, 2009/936/JHA and 2009/968/JHA, OJ L 135, 24.5.2016, p. 53.
    • [3] Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 November 2018 on the establishment, operation and use of the Schengen Information System (SIS) in the field of police cooperation and judicial cooperation in criminal matters, amending and repealing Council Decision 2007/533/JHA, and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1986/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Commission Decision 2010/261/EU, OJ L 312, 7.12.2018, p. 56.
    Last updated: 9 April 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Video: Kosovo: Conduct of elections was notably peaceful – Special Envoy briefing | United Nations

    Source: United Nations (Video News)

    Briefing by Caroline Ziadeh, Special Representative of the Secretary-General and Head of the United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo, on the situation in Kosovo.

    ——————————-

    “Civil society interlocutors, political and community leaders alike pointed to a continued trust deficit,” said UN envoy Caroline Ziadeh, urging dialogue to ease tensions in Kosovo.

    Briefing the Security Council on the situation in Kosovo, Ziadeh noted progress on some fronts, including the February parliamentary elections, which, despite technical issues and party appeals, were held without major incident. “It was especially encouraging to note the gains in women’s representation,” she added.

    The UN envoy welcomed the recent appointment of Peter Sørensen as EU Special Representative for the Belgrade-Pristina Dialogue, describing his “early engagement” as “an opportunity to support both sides in making headway.” Referring to an earlier agreement between the parties, she said, “The progress made in December, when Belgrade and Pristina agreed on the terms of reference for the Joint Commission on Missing Persons, should inspire both sides to move forward in other areas of the Dialogue.”

    Ziadeh also voiced concern over the deteriorating situation in northern Kosovo. “When I visited northern Kosovo on 25 March, civil society interlocutors, political and community leaders alike pointed to a continued trust deficit particularly vis-à-vis the institutions,” she said. “They lamented the unilateral actions taken by the Pristina authorities, including the recent closures of Serbia-run Centres of Social Welfare and the adverse socio-economic impact this has had.”

    She condemned the attack on the Ibar-Lepenac/Ibër-Lepenc water canal on 29 November and reiterated a call “for a comprehensive and transparent investigation to identify and hold accountable those responsible.” She said, “I urge all leaders to act responsibly, avoid escalation, and to cooperate in bringing the perpetrators to justice.”

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=blAhZPufDns

    MIL OSI Video –

  • MIL-OSI Video: Ukraine: Civilians are paying a devastating price for war – OCHA Briefing | United Nations

    Source: United Nations (Video News)

    Briefing by Tom Fletcher, Under-Secretary-General for Humanitarian Affairs and Emergency Relief Coordinator, Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, on Ukraine.

    —————————

    Following “a massive strike” in the Ukrainian city of Kryvyi Rih last Friday which resulted in multiple civilian casualties, and a series of attacks against civilian infrastructure United Nations Emergency Relief Coordinator Tom Fletcher told the Security Council that “this brutal pattern of civilian death and destruction in populated areas must stop.”

    Fletcher told the Council that according to authorities, “18 civilians were killed, including nine children, and 75 others injured when a children’s playground and nearby residential area were hit,” and noted that in recent weeks “civilian infrastructure – including healthcare facilities, apartment blocks, schools and children’s playgrounds – have suffered extensive damage.”

    The humanitarian Chief said, “civilians are paying a devastating price for this horrendous war,” with at least 12,910 civilians killed, including 682 children, and almost 30,700 injured across Ukraine from 24 February 2022 to 31 March 2025.”

    The true toll, he said, “is likely far greater.”

    Fletcher welcomed the recent announcement of a ceasefire focused on energy infrastructure, as well as negotiations to ensure safe navigation in the Black Sea and said, “ultimately the best protection of civilians is that this war ends. Until it does, the negotiating priority – whether as part of a temporary pause or lasting agreement – must start from the protection and needs of civilians.”

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hu0VQhu1FLs

    MIL OSI Video –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Worrying rise in terrorism threat level in Europe – E-003072/2024(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    While national security is a competence of the Member States[1], the Commission has supported the Member States to counter terrorism as regards the protection of public spaces[2] and countering threats posed by non-cooperative drones[3].

    Considering the high and fast evolving security threat in the EU, the Commission has adopted a new Internal Security Strategy[4] and is preparing a new Agenda on Preventing and Countering Terrorism and Violent Extremism[5].

    The Commission will also propose to strengthen the EU Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol), whose mandate was already reinforced in 2022[6].

    The Pact on Migration and Asylum[7] entered into force in June 2024 and will enter into application in June 2026. This will ensure that the EU has strong and secure external borders, that people’s rights are guaranteed, and that no EU country is left alone under pressure.

    The status of churches and religious associations is defined by the national laws of Member States[8] thus matters concerning the foreign funding of religious associations fall within their competence.

    The Commission is supporting Member States to develop and implement policies and strategies to prevent and counter violent extremism at national level through the EU Knowledge Hub on Prevention of Radicalisation[9] with particular attention paid to youth.

    Furthermore, the EU Internet Forum[10] brings together technology companies, Member States, and other relevant actors to develop concrete actions to address violent extremist and terrorist content online.

    The regulation on addressing the dissemination of terrorist content online[11] requires Member States to issue removal orders of terrorist content to online service providers offering services in the EU.

    • [1] Article 4(2) of the Treaty of the European Union.
    • [2] https://home-affairs.ec.europa.eu/policies/internal-security/counter-terrorism-and-radicalisation/protection_en
    • [3] Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on countering potential threats posed by drones, COM(2023) 659 final.
    • [4] https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_25_920
    • [5] Announced in the Political Guidelines for the next European Commission (2024-2029), https://commission.europa.eu/document/download/e6cd4328-673c-4e7a-8683-f63ffb2cf648_en?filename=Political%20Guidelines%202024-2029_EN.pdf
    • [6] Regulation (EU) 2022/991 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2022 amending Regulation (EU) 2016/794, as regards Europol’s cooperation with private parties, the processing of personal data by Europol in support of criminal investigations, and Europol’s role in research and innovation.
    • [7] Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on a New Pact on Migration and Asylum, COM(2020) 609 final.
    • [8] Article 17 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
    • [9] https://home-affairs.ec.europa.eu/networks/eu-knowledge-hub-prevention-radicalisation_en
    • [10] https://home-affairs.ec.europa.eu/networks/european-union-Internet-forum_en
    • [11] Regulation (EU) 2021/784 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2021 on addressing the dissemination of terrorist content online.
    Last updated: 9 April 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – The abominable massacre of Christians and Alawites in Syria and the urgent need for an immediate and decisive EU response – P-001051/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    On 11 March 2025, the High Representative/Vice-President issued a statement on behalf of the EU[1], which condemned in the strongest terms the horrific crimes committed against civilians, including summary killings, many of which allegedly perpetrated by armed groups supporting the security forces of the transitional authorities.

    The EU called for a swift, transparent and impartial investigation to be conducted to ensure that perpetrators are brought to justice. It welcomed the commitments made by the transitional authorities, in particular the establishment of an investigative committee.

    It further called on the transitional authorities to allow the Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Syrian Arab Republic to investigate all violations. Everything must be done to prevent any such crimes from happening again.

    The EU continues to call for an end to violence across Syria and urges all parties to protect Syrians form all ethnic and religious background without discrimination.

    The EU consistently supports a peaceful and inclusive Syrian-led political transition, grounded on the respect for international law, human rights, fundamental freedoms, pluralism and tolerance among all components of society.

    The EU continues to be a staunch supporter of accountability mechanisms working on Syria, including the International, Impartial and Independent Mechanism, the Commission of Inquiry, and the new Independent Institution on Missing Persons.

    • [1] https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2025/03/11/syria-statement-by-the-high-representative-on-behalf-of-the-european-union-on-the-recent-wave-of-violence/pdf/
    Last updated: 9 April 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Briefing – Powering national financial instruments with Next Generation EU – 09-04-2025

    Source: European Parliament

    In the EU context, financial instruments represent measures for financial support provided from the EU budget – in addition to traditional grants – to address one or more specific EU policy objectives. While these instruments can take various forms, they are largely grouped into equity investments, loans or guarantees, and can be used in combination with grants. In policymaking, financial instruments are of great value, as they produce a leverage effect that unlocks public and – most importantly – private resources beyond the initially invested capital. Financial instruments can be set up at different levels of governance. The Next Generation EU (NGEU) recovery instrument, worth up to €712 billion, was set up to help Member States emerge more resilient from the pandemic while fostering the green and digital transitions. It does so through its main spending tool – the Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF) –in the form of grants and loans. Moreover, NGEU combines loans and grants, which maximises the value added of this EU policy response focused on recovery and resilience. Through the individual national recovery plans that Member States needed to develop to tap into the RRF, NGEU can finance, among other projects, investment and reform measures creating national financial instruments. These measures address – to a varying extent – the country-specific recommendations that are relevant to financial instruments. The six selected reform measures range from strengthening capital markets in Slovenia to adopting laws allowing the use of guaranteed loans to improve energy efficiency in Greece. The 13 chosen investment measures, amounting to roughly €13.9 billion, include equity growth instruments for businesses in Bulgaria, financial instruments for digital innovation in Latvia, and guarantees for student loans in France. Eight Member States have not introduced financial instrument measures in their recovery plans, since this is not a requirement. Experts emphasise that the RRF has led to the uptake of some financial instruments, particularly regarding energy efficiency, which was deemed a positive trend.

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – The financing of Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty – E-001357/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-001357/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Danuše Nerudová (PPE), Jan Farský (PPE), Andrzej Halicki (PPE), Nikola Minchev (Renew), Sergey Lagodinsky (Verts/ALE), Radan Kanev (PPE), Virginijus Sinkevičius (Verts/ALE), Irena Joveva (Renew), Joanna Scheuring-Wielgus (S&D), Olivier Chastel (Renew), Paulius Saudargas (PPE), Bernard Guetta (Renew), Michalis Hadjipantela (PPE), Elisabeth Grossmann (S&D), Hristo Petrov (Renew), Tomáš Zdechovský (PPE), Ondřej Krutílek (ECR), Manuela Ripa (PPE), Vlad Vasile-Voiculescu (Renew), Benoit Cassart (Renew), Alexandr Vondra (ECR), Andrey Kovatchev (PPE), Dainius Žalimas (Renew), Martin Hojsík (Renew), Veronika Cifrová Ostrihoňová (Renew), Lucia Yar (Renew), Ľubica Karvašová (Renew), Michal Wiezik (Renew), Veronika Vrecionová (ECR), Magdalena Adamowicz (PPE), Matthias Ecke (S&D), Sebastian Tynkkynen (ECR), Mika Aaltola (PPE), Janusz Lewandowski (PPE), Thijs Reuten (S&D), Miriam Lexmann (PPE), Sandra Kalniete (PPE), Gabriella Gerzsenyi (PPE), Siegfried Mureşan (PPE)

    The Trump administration has decided to reduce the activities of several agencies to a minimum, including those of the United States Agency for Global Media. A concrete result of this decision is the cancellation of the grant for the historic radio station Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, which played a crucial role in tearing down the Iron Curtain in Europe. Even today, it continues to broadcast news to countries with authoritarian regimes, promoting the European way of life, freedom of speech, human rights and democracy. It is in Europe’s interest that such broadcasting continues, as it provides crucial support to democratic forces, especially in eastern European countries, including Russia, and in parts of Asia.

    • 1.How does the Commission intend to protect pro-democratic radio stations, such as Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, that are endangered by the cuts enacted by the Trump administration?
    • 2.Is the Commission assessing ways of providing financial support to Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty to help it to continue its activities?

    Submitted: 2.4.2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Violence in Buenaventura and the role of European companies – E-001350/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-001350/2025/rev.1
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Ana Miranda Paz (Verts/ALE)

    According to the Commission, the presence of European companies ensures development and creates jobs, all the while respecting human rights, including environmental rights. According to a report submitted by PBI and Oidhaco on Buenaventura (Department of Valle del Cauca), this does not really seem to be the case. Rather, the situation in Buenaventura seems to be defined by discrimination, violence and racism. It is one of the most violent cities in the country and the level of extortion by illegal armed groups is widespread, affecting all businesses. Multidimensional poverty indices are twice as high as the national average. That said, there are many undertakings operating there (ports, logistics, road construction).

    • 1.What concrete actions is the Commission taking to ensure that companies operating there do not directly or indirectly, whether voluntarily or involuntarily, benefit from this context of systematic violence – or have done so in the past?
    • 2.To what extent have the communities affected by the social and environmental impacts of these businesses been involved in the Commissions monitoring activities regarding the actions of European undertakings?
    • 3.How can the European Commission, in the face of situations such as this, propose a directive that weakens the directives we have in terms of due diligence, corporate responsibility and taxonomy?

    Submitted: 2.4.2025

    Last updated: 9 April 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Impact of the Trump administration’s decision to impose tariffs on European goods: impact on the Galician automotive sector – E-001311/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-001311/2025/rev.1
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Ana Miranda Paz (Verts/ALE)

    At the beginning of March, the Commission presented the Industrial Action Plan for the European automotive sector. This does not protect jobs in areas that are highly dependent on this industry, such as Galicia, and Vigo in particular, where the transnational company Stellantis produces cars. At the same time, the Trump administration will impose tariffs on European goods, which will negatively affect the automotive industry and therefore put those remaining jobs in an even more difficult situation.

    How will the Commission protect the automotive industry in the face of this very real threat to European industry and protect the interests of Galician automotive workers in a situation involving unlawful competition?

    Submitted: 29.3.2025

    Last updated: 9 April 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Decline of multilingualism: French in regression and the predominance of English – E-001199/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-001199/2025/rev.1
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Catherine Griset (PfE), Pierre-Romain Thionnet (PfE), Mélanie Disdier (PfE), Julien Leonardelli (PfE), Gilles Pennelle (PfE), Valérie Deloge (PfE), Alexandre Varaut (PfE), Mathilde Androuët (PfE), Angéline Furet (PfE), Séverine Werbrouck (PfE), Christophe Bay (PfE), Julie Rechagneux (PfE), Pierre Pimpie (PfE), Thierry Mariani (PfE), Aleksandar Nikolic (PfE), Pascale Piera (PfE)

    Multilingualism is a fundamental pillar of European integration and an ideal borne by the Union’s founding fathers. However, the Lequesne report makes alarming reading: between 1999 and 2019, the proportion of Commission documents drafted in French as the source language fell from 34 % to just 3.7 %, while in 85 % of cases English was used.

    On the one hand, this imbalance is a democratic problem, as the main working language of the Commission is the language of just 1 % of Europeans. On the other hand, it promotes a worrying cultural, legal and political dependence on Anglo-Saxon influence.

    • 1.Is the Commission fully assessing the risks that this shift towards monolingualism poses to linguistic diversity, European sovereignty and the democratic functioning of our institutions?
    • 2.Will it take tangible measures to ensure balanced use of the official languages and to preserve the use of French?

    Supporters[1]

    Submitted: 20.3.2025

    • [1] This question is supported by Members other than the authors: Jean-Paul Garraud (PfE), Marie-Luce Brasier-Clain (PfE)
    Last updated: 9 April 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Protection of EU staff’s freedom of speech and conscientious objection in the workplace – E-001366/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-001366/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Matjaž Nemec (S&D), Brando Benifei (S&D), Mimmo Lucano (The Left), Irena Joveva (Renew), Rima Hassan (The Left), Alex Agius Saliba (S&D), Rudi Kennes (The Left), Hanna Gedin (The Left), Jonas Sjöstedt (The Left), Sandro Ruotolo (S&D), Leila Chaibi (The Left), Mounir Satouri (Verts/ALE), Catarina Martins (The Left), Hana Jalloul Muro (S&D), Carla Tavares (S&D), Saskia Bricmont (Verts/ALE), Vladimir Prebilič (Verts/ALE), Bruno Gonçalves (S&D), Jaume Asens Llodrà (Verts/ALE), Nikos Pappas (The Left), Merja Kyllönen (The Left), Majdouline Sbai (Verts/ALE), Benedetta Scuderi (Verts/ALE), Marit Maij (S&D), Per Clausen (The Left), João Oliveira (The Left), Damien Carême (The Left)

    We have become aware of deeply concerning reports that EU institution staff members are facing or risking disciplinary procedures, as well as other measures, for publicly or professionally expressing their opinions on certain current affairs topics (such as the ongoing genocide in Gaza) that do not align with the official position of the institutions’ leadership. The right to freedom of expression should always be secured, even in the workplace. This was confirmed, among other instances, in the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 5 February 2020 on Application No 11608/15.

    Even more concerning are reports that EU staff members risk discrimination or disciplinary measures for invoking conscientious objection when dealing with official business or instructions from management on similar topics that conflict with their beliefs, values and human dignity.

    We therefore ask the Commission:

    • 1.Have any disciplinary measures been taken against any staff members in this regard?
    • 2.How does the Commission ensure an environment where freedom of speech is protected and guaranteed, regardless of the Commission’s and the EU leadership’s official stance?
    • 3.What mechanisms are in place to ensure that staff can, irrespective of the type of contract they have, express conscientious objection without facing discrimination or disciplinary procedures of any kind in their workplace?

    Submitted: 2.4.2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Netherlands: EIB Group and ABN AMRO to make over €1 billion available for Dutch businesses

    Source: European Investment Bank

    EIB Group and ABN AMRO sign synthetic securitisation agreement, enabling €1.2 billion in new lending for Dutch businesses, part of the new funding is earmarked for sustainable SMEs.

    ABN AMRO Bank has entered into a risk sharing agreement with the EIB Group – consisting of the European Investment Fund (EIF) and the European Investment Bank (EIB) – on a portfolio of over €1 billion in existing loans to Dutch businesses originated by ABN AMRO. Under this synthetic securitisation transaction, a guarantee structure from the EIB Group reduces ABN AMRO’s credit risk exposure, freeing up capital for new lending to small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and Mid-Caps. The Dutch lender will thus be able provide over €1.2 billion in new financing at favourable rates to companies in the Netherlands. Part of the newly available financing is earmarked for environmental sustainability projects, supporting the transition to climate neutrality and a sustainable society.

    With this ground-breaking transaction, the EIB Group and ABN AMRO build on their longstanding partnership to help Dutch business secure financing at competitive interest rates.

    ABN AMRO Chief Commercial Officer Corporate Banking Dan Dorner: “We have a strategic goal to support SME’s and Mid-Caps. We are therefore delighted once again to be in a position to offer EIB financing to our clients. ABN AMRO and the EIB have partnered several years to provide financing to Dutch companies. The EIB offers favourable conditions for our clients. This transaction will support the economic growth of our clients and their transition to climate neutrality and boost the SME loans in the Dutch market.”

    EIB Group vice-president Robert de Groot added: “We are proud to close this landmark deal, which is the largest securitisation transaction in EIB Group history. It is also our first collaboration of this kind with ABN AMRO, leveraging on the strong relationship between both banks. This partnership will significantly enhance the availability of financing for SMEs and Mid-Caps in the Netherlands, driving economic growth and job creation.”

    Framework for financing

    As part of their mission to support EU policy goals, the European Investment Bank (EIB) and European Investment Fund (EIF) work to enhance capital access for innovative companies in Europe and beyond. SMEs and mid-caps are a key part of the Dutch, European and global economy, creating jobs and driving economic development and innovation. Under the current partnership agreement with the EIB Group, ABN AMRO is able to offer Dutch borrowers a loan discount, subject to specific conditions. The final decision on lending activities under this facility rests with ABN AMRO.

    Transaction details

    This transaction is the first synthetic securitisation entered into between ABN AMRO and the EIB Group, referencing a portfolio of Dutch SME and corporate exposures and enables ABN AMRO to free up capital for new lending to Dutch SMEs and Mid-Caps, of which at least 30% will be allocated to projects aligned with criteria for climate action and environmental sustainability, highlighting the commitment of ABN AMRO and the EIB Group to support the transition to a low-carbon economy.

    Both EIB and EIF are involved in the transaction. The EIF is providing protection on the mezzanine tranche of €150 million and on the senior tranche of €835 million. The EIF’s mezzanine tranche exposure as well as part of the EIF’s senior tranche exposure is in turn counter-guaranteed by the EIB. The junior tranche is fully retained by ABN AMRO. Key features of the transaction include synthetic excess spread, a three-year revolving period and pro-rata amortisation of the senior and the mezzanine tranches, subject to performance triggers.

    Background information

    The European Investment Bank (EIB) is the long-term lending institution of the European Union, owned by its Member States. The Netherlands owns a 5,2% share of the EIB. It makes long-term finance available for sound investment in order to contribute towards EU policy goals and national priorities. More than 90% of its activity is in Europe. Over the last ten years, the EIB has made available more than €27 billion in financing for Dutch projects in various sectors, including research & development, sustainable mobility, drinking water, healthcare and SMEs. In 2024 the EIB Group, which also includes the EIB’s subsidiary, the European Investment Fund (EIF), made available more than €3 billion for Dutch projects.

    The European Investment Fund (EIF) supports Europe’s micro, small and medium-sized enterprises by providing equity capital, loans and guarantees through a wide network of selected financial intermediaries. The EIF was established in 1994 and is active in all EU countries, prospective member countries, Liechtenstein and Norway. The majority shareholder of EIF is EIB and other shareholders include the European Commission and a range of European financial institutions.

    ABN AMRO is a Dutch bank for retail, corporate and private banking clients, offering a full range of financial products and solutions. Our focus is on Northwest Europe. ABN AMRO’s purpose is Banking for better, for generations to come. Headquartered in Amsterdam, the bank serves over 5 million clients and employs more than 19,000 people. Please visit us at  www.abnamro.com. 

    MIL OSI Europe News –

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – EUR 4.7 billion investment package for South Africa – E-001331/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-001331/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Siegbert Frank Droese (ESN)

    In January 2025, South African President Cyril Ramaphosa signed the Expropriations Act of 2024 into law, thereby allowing the state to seize land without compensation. This act also extends the grounds on which the government may expropriate land, from the improvement of public service, such as for infrastructure and hospitals, to include the ‘public interest’. The public interest is defined in section 25(4)(a) of the South African Constitution as including initiatives supporting land reform and equitable access to natural resources.

    In March 2025, EU leaders announced a EUR 4.7 billion investment package for South Africa.

    The rule of law, enshrined in Article 2 of the Treaty on European Union, is the cornerstone of the EU.

    In the light of this:

    • 1.Does the Commission consider South Africa’s Expropriations Act to be in keeping with the principles of the rule of law as enshrined in Article 2?
    • 2.How does the Commission interpret the idea of the state expropriating land without compensation as achieving ‘equity’?
    • 3.Does the observance of the rule of law in a country factor into the Commission’s decisions regarding whether to grant aid or investment?

    Submitted: 1.4.2025

    Last updated: 9 April 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –