Category: European Union

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: expert reaction to a cohort study looking at the association between vaping and rates of smoking cessation and tobacco abstinence

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    A cohort study published in JAMA Network Open looks at the association between vaping and smoking cessation rates. 

    Dr Jamie Hartmann-Boyce, Assistant Professor of Health Policy and Management, University of Massachusetts Amherst, said:

    Is this good quality research?  Are the conclusions backed up by solid data?

    “The authors do a thorough job of investigating results from a large, representative US survey. The type of methods they use mean they can talk about associations – whether something is more or less likely – but not about causal relationships. This research cannot establish whether e-cigarettes cause more or fewer people to stop smoking.

    How does this work fit with the existing evidence?

    “There is a large, high certainty body of evidence from randomized controlled trials that nicotine e-cigarettes help people quit smoking. Randomized controlled trials are considered the best way to establish the effects of an intervention, where feasible. 

    Have the authors accounted for confounders? Are there important limitations to be aware of?

    “The authors have accounted for a large range of confounders, but rightly note that there could be additional unmeasured confounders which affect relationships between vaping and subsequent smoking cessation. The most important limitation is that this is an observational data set, and the techniques they use cannot establish causality.

    What are the implications in the real world?  Is there any overspeculation?  

    “The authors conclude that these data “suggest vaping prolongs smoking and nicotine dependence among US smokers.” As noted above, substantial randomized controlled trial evidence – considered the gold standard – shows the opposite – namely that when you give people who smoke e-cigarettes, it helps them quit smoking.”

    Prof Peter Hajek, Professor of Clinical Psychology, and Director of the Health and Lifestyle Research Unit, Queen Mary University of London (QMUL), said:

    “The study, like several earlier ones, compared future smoking cessation in people who at baseline did and did not use vapes BUT SMOKED and reports that vaping does not help with quitting smoking. This raises a question of how is that possible when randomised controlled trials as well as epidemiological data show that vaping is one of the most effective ways there are of helping smokers quit. The answer is that the study used a method that automatically generates skewed results. In the vaping group, only those unable to stop smoking despite using vapes were included. Vapers who stopped smoking were excluded. This makes it an obviously unfair comparison, a bit like staging a competition between two schools after removing the best competitors from one of them.”

    Daily or Nondaily Vaping and Smoking Cessation Among Smokers’ by Quash et al. was published in JAMA Network Open at 16:00 UK time on Wednesday 5th February.

    DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.0089

    Declared interests

    Dr Jamie Hartmann-Boyce “I receive research funding for related work from Cancer Research UK and the NIH-FDA in the US.”

    Prof Peter Hajek “No COI”

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: expert reaction to study suggesting Aspirin may enhance the immune response against cancer metastasis in mice

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    A study published in Nature suggests that Asprin enhances the immune response against cancer metastasis in mice. 

    Dr Harvey Roweth, a cancer biologist at the University of Reading, said:

    “I don’t think we can say that cancer patients should be taking aspirin – at least, not yet.

    “Aspirin is a very accessible drug, with relatively few side effects. This study in mice suggests we should further assess a role for aspirin in human metastatic cancer. It is worth noting that prior clinical studies that tested aspirin as a tool in fighting metastasis in human patients have been conflicting and often inconclusive. There are even some reports that conclude that aspirin may do more harm than good.”

    “The mouse models don’t capture the full complexity of metastatic disease. Plus, in this study, the mouse models used predominantly look at melanoma cells that metastasises to the lungs. So, the paper doesn’t account for different cancers and spread to other organs.

    “As a cancer biologist, the finding that is most exciting to me is that aspirin can preserve T-cell immune responses in an animal model.

    “What we need now – and I strongly agree with the authors on this – are new randomised controlled trials that focus on finding biomarkers of the patient’s immune response. This is how we will find out which cancers and which patients are most likely to benefit from aspirin.

    “It will also be important to consider that aspirin can be unsafe for certain individual patients. It can cause disruption of the stomach lining and increase the risk of bleeding in the gut. The study does not account for such side effects.

    “There is some promise that aspirin will help patients in the future. It will need to be considered alongside existing therapies – aspirin is extremely unlikely to become a stand-alone treatment for cancers.”

     

     

    Prof Mangesh Thorat, Honorary Reader, Queen Mary University of London & Consultant Breast Surgeon (Locum), Homerton University Hospital, London, said:

    “We have known for a while that the beneficial effect of aspirin in preventing deaths from certain cancers is greater in magnitude than its effect in preventing development of these cancers. This can only happen if aspirin prevented or abrogated metastases from such cancers. Although it was thought to be mediated through the anti-platelet role of aspirin, the exact mechanism remained elusive. This elegant study in mice sheds light on how aspirin’s anti-platelet action reverses the suppression of certain immune cells, which then prevent development of metastases. In many ways, this study provides the missing piece of the jigsaw puzzle. There are several ongoing clinical trials of aspirin in certain cancers. The new insights from this study will now allow us to investigate data and materials from these trials to see if aspirin use can be personalised through use of biomarkers to achieve a more favourable benefit-harm balance. These insights will also allow us to develop new studies to investigate if aspirin and other immune-directed therapies can work in a synergistic manner to improve outcomes in advanced cancers.  

    “It is important to acknowledge that since it aimed to elucidate a specific mechanism, the study looked at only a few cancer types and only at lung and liver as metastatic sites. Although different cancers share many common pathways, each cancer type (and subtype) is unique. This means that the magnitude of effect likely varies between different cancers. It is therefore quite possible that the beneficial effects of aspirin will be limited to certain cancer types as the epidemiological data suggest. We will need to wait for mature data from the current trials before aspirin’s use as a cancer treatment can be considered.

    “If you are a cancer patient, don’t rush to your local pharmacy to buy aspirin just yet, but actively consider participation in ongoing or upcoming trials of aspirin.”

     

     

    Professor Alan Melcher, Professor of Translation Immunotherapy at The Institute of Cancer Research, London, said:

    “We have known for some time that aspirin can potentially boost the immune response to cancer. What this research tells us is a new mechanism of action that aspirin may be using to do this in mice.

    “This is an interesting finding but will not directly change how people should be using aspirin. The side effects of the drug are not trivial – such as stomach bleeding. Currently, there are large trials underway to determine the risk versus benefit of using aspirin as part of the treatment of cancer. This new research may help to design better, more targeted drugs, that interfere with the mechanism discovered here to do the good things that aspirin does, without the harmful side effects.”

    Aspirin prevents metastasis by limiting platelet TXA2 suppression of T cell immunity’ by Jie Yang et al. will be published in Nature at 16:00 UK time on Wednesday 5 March 2025.

    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-025-08626-7

    Declared interests

    Prof Mangesh Thorat: No Financial interests to declare. Mangesh Thorat is a member of data monitoring committees of a few multi-national trials investigating aspirin, for example, ADD-Aspirin, CaPP3 and COLOPREVENT.

    Professor Alan Melcher: no interests to declare.

    Dr Harvey Roweth: Confirmed no COI’s. 

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Carers encouraged to make their voices heard by filling in new survey

    Source: City of Stoke-on-Trent

    Published: Wednesday, 5th March 2025

    Unpaid carers of adults and children are being asked to have their say to help design services that support them.

    The survey will help to fully understand what life is like for carers and how effectively they are being supported when they need it.

    It also aims to explore how carers feel about their role and their views on any support they may be receiving. 

    This survey is for all carers. This includes children and young people under 18 who care for a family member or friend – to understand what support they receive and from who, such as their school or college or a carers support service. 

    The survey can be filled in online by visiting www.stoke.gov.uk/carerssurvey. Alternatively, people can call 01782 231550 and leave a message – then a member of the team will call back to complete the survey over the phone.

    The survey runs from 5 March until 2 April.

    Councillor Sarah Hill – Cabinet Member for Children’s Services at Stoke-on-Trent City Council – said: “Unpaid carers play a really important role providing essential care for family members, friends or neighbours.”

    “Lots of carers, especially young carers, don’t identify themselves as carers. They simply see themselves as a relative, friend or neighbour. That means they could be missing out on valuable support.

    “We want them and the person they care for to feel included, have a voice and tell us how they feel so we can make the best decisions.”   

    Councillor Duncan Walker – Cabinet Member for Adult Services at Stoke-on-Trent City Council – said: “We are currently talking to unpaid carers to fully understand what life is like for them and how they are being supported when they need support themselves.

    “It is vital we know how carers feel about their role – and the findings from this survey will help us to see how well carers are supported and if there are areas we need to improve on.”

    North Staffs Carers provide a support service for all carers. They work alongside a number of local partner organisations, as well as the council’s Young Carers Assessment Team and Adult Social Care, to maximise support and bring together services to form a clear pathway forward.

    This aims to ensure carers receive seamless individualised support throughout their caring journey. 

    For more details about the service visit: www.carersfirst.com/s-o-t-all-age-carers-service

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Council approves ambitious Budget plan

    Source: Scotland – City of Aberdeen

    New and upgraded schools, a major roads project, continuing investment in the city centre, and increased support for vulnerable and disadvantaged citizens form the basis of Aberdeen City Council’s 2025/26 Budget, which was approved today. 

    The Council is to spend £247 million on schools over the next five years, including £121m on the new Hazlehead Academy. There is a commitment to expand facilities at Harlaw Academy, refurbish St Peter’s Roman Catholic School and Ferryhill Primary, and progress an extension for Bucksburn Academy. 

    To help reduce congestion, £55 million will go to the Berryden Corridor Improvement Project, with work starting next year. In the city centre, £13m will be used to enhance the Castlegate as a public space. 

    The Budget also makes £1.534m available to the Fairer Aberdeen Fund in 2025/26, £1m through the Anti-Poverty and Inequality Committee for people struggling with the cost of living, and an extra £9.5m to deliver social care, bringing the Council’s total award to the Integration Joint Board (IJB) to £140m for the coming 12 months. 

    Councillor Alex McLellan, convener of the Finance and Resources Committee, said: “Despite the Council operating in incredibly challenging circumstances, we remain focussed on delivering essential public services and assisting people through the ongoing cost-of-living crisis. 

    “Aberdeen City Council is continuing to invest in the school estate, in roads, and other key infrastructure such as the regeneration of the city centre and beach area. 

    “These actions will ensure Aberdeen continues to be a place people want to live, want to work, want to raise a family, and want to start a business.” 

    The Budget allocates £668m to delivering public services in 2025/26 and £709m to capital projects over the next five years. 

    The Common Good Fund will help provide nearly £1.5m for to 15 external organisations for 2025/26, supporting recommendations put forward by the Culture Investment Panel.  Aberdeen Performing Arts was awarded £961,000.

    Sport Aberdeen, which operates the city’s leisure venues, will receive £4.1m for 2025/26. 

    And the Council will also fund a Cruyff Court in Kincorth – the city’s 4th – in partnership with the Denis Law Legacy Trust.  

    The gap between income and expenditure was estimated at £18.1m for 2025/26. To help address the shortfall and maintain service delivery, Council Tax is to rise by 9.85% in 2025/26. 

    For the next 12 months the Council’s Carbon Budget was set at 22,567 tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent, a maximum target on the road to Next Zero emissions by 2045.  

    Actions agreed include:  

    • Completing a £19m investment in a Hydrogen Hub, a joint venture with bp to produce and distribute green hydrogen;
    • £9m to enlarge the electric vehicle charging network. 

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Plans for city’s fourth Cruyff Court announced

    Source: Scotland – City of Aberdeen

    Aberdeen’s fourth Cruyff Court will be constructed in Kincorth, it was announced today (5 March) at the Full Council Budget meeting.

    The court will be built on pitches close to the site of the former Kincorth Academy building as part of the ongoing successful partnership comprising Aberdeen City Council, The Denis Law Legacy Trust and The Cruyff Foundation.

    The new facility, once completed, will provide a space for multiple sports that will be free for the local community to use.

    Aberdeen is already one of only two UK cities, the other being London, that has three Cruyff Courts. This additional fourth court will mean the city will equal London’s four Cruyff Courts.

    Convener of Finance and Resources Committee Councillor Alex McLellan said: “This new Cruyff Court will be a real asset for the community of Kincorth and will directly benefit many young people.

    “I’m delighted that we have approved the funding today for what will be Aberdeen’s fourth Cruyff Court and I look forward to working with partners, and the local community, to see the project delivered.”

    Convener of Communities, Housing and Public Protection Committee Councillor Miranda Radley said: “This commitment by Aberdeen City Council, to deliver a Cruyff Court in Kincorth, will be a huge benefit to the young people in the area and I look forward to this free to access, accessible sports facility, being delivered for the community of Kincorth.”

    Mark Williams, Chief Operating Officer of the Denis Law Legacy Trust said: “It’s exciting to help create and introduce another impactful safe space that will help benefit thousands of people both physically and mentally whilst supporting young people to grow and enjoy friendships at the same time”

    David Suttie, Trustee of the Denis Law Legacy Trust said: “The previous 3 Courts in the city have made a big difference in their communities.  The Partnership with Aberdeen City Councill, the Johan Cruyff Foundation and ourselves continues to be very successful and we all look forward to delivering something special once again.”

    Simon Wood from the Johan Cruyff Foundation said: “It’s great to work with long time partners Denis Law Legacy Trust and Aberdeen City Council again to look at delivering a 4th Cruyff Court to Aberdeen city.”

    The Cruyff Courts are a worldwide project by The Cruyff Foundation with the aim of providing safe spaces for communities to play outside and enjoy the benefits of team games and making new friends.

    The new Cruyff Court in Kincorth will become Aberdeen’s fourth court alongside Cruyff Court Denis Law in Catherine Street, Cruyff Court Neale Cooper in Tullos and Cruyff Court Willie Miller in Tillydrone.

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI Global: Academic freedom and democracy under siege: how a Nobel peace prize could help defend them

    Source: The Conversation – France – By Stéphanie Balme, Director, CERI (Centre de recherches internationales), Sciences Po

    A rally for science drew a big crowd during the American Geophysical Union’s meeting in San Francisco. MarcioJoseSanchez/AP, CC BY

    March 7 has been recognized as the “Day of the Stand Up for Science Movement”, launched in 2017 in response to the anti-science actions of the first Trump administration. Under the second, attacks on scientists and scientific inquiry have escalated into a systematic assault–tantamount to a coup d’Etat against science itself.

    While Donald Trump is often portrayed as erratic, his policies in this area have followed a consistent trajectory. His new administration has once again declared ‘war’ on evidence-based national policymaking and science diplomacy in foreign affairs as evidenced by several early actions. Immediately after taking office, Donald Trump issued executive orders freezing or canceling tens of billions in research funding. All National Science Foundation projects have been halted pending review, while the National Institutes of Health faces suspensions under Health and Human Services directives. The US has withdrawn from the Paris Agreement and the World Health Organization, alongside a sweeping review of 90% of USAID-funded projects, signaling a major retreat from climate and global health diplomacy. Federal agencies and universities are in turmoil, leaving thousands of research-professors in limbo amid a politically driven funding freeze. The 2025 March simply calls for the restoration of federal research funding and an end to government censorship and political interference in science.

    Du lundi au vendredi + le dimanche, recevez gratuitement les analyses et décryptages de nos experts pour un autre regard sur l’actualité. Abonnez-vous dès aujourd’hui !

    The US is the world’s undisputed scientific superpower–for now

    While the Trump administration is not the sole force undermining academia worldwide, its actions are particularly striking coming from the world’s leading scientific superpower. Moreover, the situation is especially concerning because developments in the United States often have a ripple effect, shaping policies in other regions in the years that follow.

    Neither of the world’s top two scientific superpowers–Washington and Beijing–is positioned to champion academic freedom. China, having failed a liberal constitutional tradition and academic independence since the 1920s, restricts academic freedom to the confines of one-party rule. Caught between these rival scientific giants–both partners and competitors–the “old” Europe and like-minded coutries remain the only actors capable of setting new standards for academic freedom.

    A Nobel prize for academic freedom

    A decisive step toward its legal protection would be formal recognition by the Nobel Committees for Peace and Science of academic freedom’s fundamental role–both in ensuring scientific excellence and as a pillar of free, democratic societies.

    For the past decade, the Scholars at Risk association (SAR) has documented a broader global decline in academic freedom in its annual Free to Think Report. The 2024 edition highlights particularly alarming situations in 18 countries and territories (including the United States), which recorded 391 attacks on scholars, students, or institutions across 51 regions in a year. Data from the Academic Freedom Index in Berlin confirm that more than half of the world’s population lives in regions where academic freedom is either entirely or severely restricted. Some of the most concerning conditions are in emerging scientific ecosystems such as Turkey, Brazil, Egypt, South Africa, or Saudi Arabia. The overall trend is deteriorating: only 10 out of 179 countries have improved, while many democratic regimes are increasingly affected.

    Academic freedom in the European Union remains relatively high compared to the rest of the world. However, nine EU member states fall below the regional average, and in eight of them, it has declined over the past decade–signaling a gradual erosion of this fundamental value. Hungary ranks the lowest among EU countries, placing in the bottom 20–30% worldwide. Recent laws have further weakened university autonomy across the EU: financial autonomy in Austria, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, and Slovakia; organizational autonomy in Slovenia, Estonia, and Denmark; staffing autonomy in Croatia and Slovakia; and academic autonomy in Denmark and Estonia. Moreover, the European Parliament’s first report on academic freedom (2023) highlights emerging threats in France–political, educational, and societal–that impact the freedom of research, teaching, and study.

    Academic freedom, a professional right granted to a few for the benefit of all

    Freedom of expression, a fundamental pillar of academic freedom, has long been established as a human right, overcoming centuries of censorship and authoritarian control. In contrast, academic freedom is a more recent principle, granting scholars–recognized by their peers–the right and responsibility to research and teach freely in pursuit of knowledge. Like press freedom for journalists, it is a right granted to a few for the benefit of all.

    Rooted in medieval Europe, academic freedom has evolved from a privilege granted to students in the Quartier Latin to a recognized principle in international rights frameworks. It gained a collective and concrete dimension in the late 18th and early 19th centuries with the rise of the modern university. Wilhelm von Humboldt, founder of the modern public university in Berlin (1810), articulated the concept of ‘freedom of science’ (Wissenschaftsfreiheit), later enshrined in the Weimar Constitution of 1919, which declared that “art, science, and education are free.” The rise of American universities around the same time reshaped the concept, giving rise to “professional academic freedom.” This was formalized in the American Association of University Professors’ 1915 Declaration of Principles on Academic Freedom and Tenure, which affirmed the scholar’s primary duty to seek and establish truth. Though its roots lie in Germany, academic freedom ultimately became a cornerstone of American academic discourse.

    In the United States, academic freedom draws from multiple sources, with its protection varying by state laws, customs, institutional practices, and the status of higher education institutions. However, U.S. Supreme Court rulings have gradually reinforced its constitutional foundation, particularly after the McCarthy era, by invoking the First Amendment. Landmark cases such as Adler v. Board of Education (1952), Wieman v. Updegraff (1952), and Sweezy v. New Hampshire (1957) helped establish a constitutional doctrine on academic freedom. Finally, Keyishian v. Board of Regents (1967) extended First Amendment protections to academia, ruling that mandatory loyalty oaths violated both academic freedom and freedom of association.

    Interestingly, the American interpretation of academic freedom is currently more restrictive than the German model in certain respects. Article 5(3) of the 1989 Basic Law affirms the “right to adopt public organizational measures essential to protect a space of freedom, fostering independent scientific activity”. In contrast, the U.S. places greater emphasis on prohibitions and prioritizing individual rights over institutional autonomy.

    The ‘right to be wrong’

    Despite local variations, academic freedom is fundamentally tied to a shared vision of the university that upholds freedom of thought, with rationality and pluralism at its core. It includes the genuine “right to be wrong”–the understanding that a scientific opinion may be incorrect or even proven so does not diminish its protection. This stands in stark contrast to the anti-science, scientistic, or techno-nationalist approach, which views knowledge as a tool of power to serve a predetermined truth and objective of dominance. Authoritarian science, driven by power interests, seeks to diminish critical humanities and social sciences while elevating religion. It tends to reject interdisciplinary work, is exclusively mathematized, and is oriented toward a centralized yet deregulated autocratic tech-utopian state model.

    Since 1945, we have operated under the illusion that academic freedom is an indispensable condition for scientific excellence. However, we have recently learned that no systematic link exists between academic freedom and breakthrough scientific innovation in our era of new technologies. Given these circumstances, this proposal advocates for a nomination for the Nobel Peace Prize, for the first time in its history, in recognition of academic freedom.

    The Nobel Prize Committees for Science and Peace share the responsibility of using their prestigious platforms to uphold fundamental scientific and democratic values. They are uniquely positioned to champion humanist science, reinforcing its importance for scholars, students, and civil societies worldwide. Since the 1950s, around 90% of Nobel Prize laureates in scientific fields have either been US citizens or have studied and worked at Ivy League research institutions.

    While some US scientists are contesting actions of the Trump administration in court, academics worldwide should stand in solidarity with their American colleagues in resisting the erosion of science. To strengthen their efforts, they require the support of the Nobel Prize Committees.

    Stéphanie Balme ne travaille pas, ne conseille pas, ne possède pas de parts, ne reçoit pas de fonds d’une organisation qui pourrait tirer profit de cet article, et n’a déclaré aucune autre affiliation que son organisme de recherche.

    ref. Academic freedom and democracy under siege: how a Nobel peace prize could help defend them – https://theconversation.com/academic-freedom-and-democracy-under-siege-how-a-nobel-peace-prize-could-help-defend-them-251494

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI Global: French nuclear deterrence for Europe: how effective could it be against Russia?

    Source: The Conversation – France – By Benoît Grémare, Chercheur associé à l’Institut d’Etudes de Stratégie et de Défense, Université Jean Moulin Lyon 3

    In February 2020, French President Emmanuel Macron said it was time to reflect on the European dimension of French nuclear deterrence. He proposed a strategic dialogue as well as joint nuclear exercises between European partners. Five years later, Germany’s likely next chancellor, Friedrich Merz, responded to this call, advocating an extension of the French nuclear umbrella to Germany – while a US led by President Donald Trump no longer appears to be a reliable partner for protecting Europe.

    But does France have the capacity to defend Europe? Would the deployment of the French nuclear umbrella in Eastern Europe make Europe strategically autonomous, giving it the means to defend itself independently?

    French nuclear deterrence against the Russian threat

    France originally developed its nuclear arsenal in response to the threat of Soviet invasion and to avoid any dependence on the US. According to a stable doctrine that political leaders regularly reaffirmed, the state [would use] its strategic arsenal by air and submarine in the event of an attack against its vital interests.

    But the fact remains that without US support, the balance of power appears largely unfavourable to France, which has a total of 290 nuclear warheads compared to at least 1,600 deployed warheads and nearly 2,800 stockpiled warheads on the Russian side.

    Certainly, the explosive power of thermonuclear warheads, combined with the range of the French M51 strategic sea-to-land ballistic missile, would make it possible to destroy the main Russian cities, including Moscow.

    However, the Russians would only need “200 seconds to atomise Paris”, according to an estimate given on Russian television about “Satan II” thermonuclear missiles.

    These scenarios recall the spectre of adversaries destroying enemy cities in a piecemeal atomic exchange, in which Russia could rely on its vastness to win through attrition. This potential for reciprocity must be kept in mind amid the mutual bet of nuclear deterrence.

    To boost the impact of French nuclear deterrence, a partnership could be envisaged with the United Kingdom. A nuclear power since 1952, London now only has ballistic missiles launched by submarine and has decided, since Brexit, to increase its arsenal to 260 warheads. But although they share common interests, these two European nuclear powers are not equivalent.

    Unlike the UK, which is a member of NATO’s nuclear planning group and whose warheads are designed in the US, France produces its weapons on its own territory and is not subject to any NATO obligations. This gives Paris a great deal of leeway in defining its doctrine. France can also speak on behalf of the European Union, of which it has been a part since its creation.

    French nuclear power: an alternative to US deterrence

    France officially became an atomic power in 1960 by relying on its own resources, with US support fluctuating according to events. The emergence of an independent French strategic force long annoyed Washington, which sought to restrict it by means of international accords such as the 1963 treaty limiting atmospheric nuclear tests and the 1968 Non-Proliferation Treaty. Since 1974, the French nuclear force has officially had a specific dissuasive role within NATO, contributing to the overall security of the transatlantic alliance by complicating the calculations of potential adversaries.

    Almost 60 years ago, US president Lyndon Johnson reinforced doubts about the White House’s determination to fully commit to the defence of Europe. Today, Trump’s desire to end US support for Ukraine confirms these suspicions. Consequently, increasingly insistent voices are calling for the acceptance of a French nuclear force that would extend to the European level.

    A French nuclear umbrella in Eastern Europe

    Merz’s call for the French nuclear umbrella to extend to Germany aligns with Paris’s proposal to establish a dialogue involving Europeans in a common approach. As France’s defence minister has pointed out, the precise definition of vital interest is up to its president. However, the use of nuclear weapons to protect Europe requires a strategic discussion to define the power to be acquired, the interests to be defended and the method of nuclear fire command.

    Moving toward a Europeanisation of nuclear force means increasing deterrent capabilities and, therefore, expanding the French arsenal so it can respond to threats affecting all 27 EU member states. This would require the creation of additional stocks of fissile material and the reactivation of production plants in Pierrelatte and Marcoule, which were dismantled in the late 1990s.

    Dogma about what constitutes a sufficient arsenal must also be questioned. If 290 nuclear warheads represent the value that France places on defending its existence, this price seems to neglect the scale of the European continent, and logic confirms it: continent-sized nuclear powers such as the US and Russia – and soon, China – are deploying an arsenal of around 1,000 thermonuclear warheads.

    Ramping up power would take time and require a budgetary effort to increase the number of missiles and carrier aircraft. In addition to the construction of new infrastructure in European partner countries, the cost could exceed €10 billion per year, not including indirect costs related to maintenance and logistics. This is a lot to take into account, especially since the political and strategic offer of extended nuclear protection evolves according to circumstances.

    Until now, Germany preferred that France assume a role that was simply complementary to the extended deterrence of the US, but Washington’s threatened abandonment of Ukraine increases the Russian threat. As Macron has indicated, France could respond by proposing the pre-positioning of its nuclear forces in Eastern European countries with the idea of eventually replacing the US.

    This French nuclear umbrella would give concrete form to European strategic autonomy through the deployment of nuclear-capable combat aircraft, a sign of European political solidarity that would make Moscow’s calculations more difficult.

    The visible presence of these aircraft in Eastern Europe could prevent Russia from attacking countries in the region with conventional means, as such an attack could provoke a French nuclear response on behalf of Europe.

    Benoît Grémare ne travaille pas, ne conseille pas, ne possède pas de parts, ne reçoit pas de fonds d’une organisation qui pourrait tirer profit de cet article, et n’a déclaré aucune autre affiliation que son organisme de recherche.

    ref. French nuclear deterrence for Europe: how effective could it be against Russia? – https://theconversation.com/french-nuclear-deterrence-for-europe-how-effective-could-it-be-against-russia-251512

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Storage facility for over 900 vehicles completed at MOD Ashchurch

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    News story

    Storage facility for over 900 vehicles completed at MOD Ashchurch

    An advanced storage facility with capacity to house over 900 Army vehicles has opened at MOD Ashchurch under the Vehicle Storage and Support Programme (VSSP).

    Brig Matt Wilkinson and VSSP Senior Responsible Owner Belinda Lunn cut the ribbon to the new building, accompanied by representatives of DIO, the Army, Skanska and Mace. Copyright Skanksa.

    As the largest Army infrastructure programme currently in delivery, VSSP is enhancing operational readiness and future capability through provision of modern, sustainable storage and maintenance solutions for the Army’s vehicle and equipment fleet.

    The programme is delivering dedicated inspection and maintenance facilities, essential office space and Controlled Humidity Environment (CHE) storage, which will reduce vehicle maintenance costs and unnecessary deterioration caused by extreme drops or rises in temperature.

    The largest CHE storage building on site, which is equivalent in size to around five football pitches at around 25,300m2, has now been handed into service, with the first vehicle rolling into the facility at an official opening ceremony on 3 March.

    A vehicle breaks the ribbon as the first vehicle to be stored in the new building. Copyright Skanksa.

    Belinda Lunn, Senior Responsible Owner of VSSP, said:

    The handover of this new CHE storage building is a fantastic milestone in our programme to deliver this exceptional facility for the Field Army. This is the fifth building to be completed under VSSP in the past year and represents a step change in the capability of the site. We look forward to further progress over coming months as we continue our collaboration with DIO and industry partners, to improve working infrastructure for personnel at MOD Ashchurch. 

    VSSP is being delivered for the Army by the Defence Infrastructure Organisation (DIO) contracting to Skanska for construction and Mace as project manager. Overall, the programme will deliver 13 new buildings alongside demolition of 58 existing buildings and renewal of site-wide infrastructure. All buildings adhere to the latest sustainability standards and support the Army’s contribution to government net zero targets, with provision to generate solar energy on site.

    Warren Webster, DIO MPP Programme Director – Army, said:

    It is always gratifying to celebrate a significant milestone for a complex construction project. The excellent progress we’ve made at VSSP has been achieved thanks to the collaborative effort of DIO, Army, Skanska and Mace project teams, and their supply chain. We are proud to be delivering modern, sustainable infrastructure that will meet the enduring requirements of the Army’s fleet and benefit military personnel.

    Terry Muckian, Skanska Executive Vice President, said:

    Working within a live military environment presents unique challenges, but through close collaboration with site personnel, we were able to maintain their operations while continuing to deliver this significant infrastructure project on schedule. Our partnership with DIO, Mace, and our supply chain was instrumental in achieving these results. Additionally, through meticulous design and construction efforts, we have ensured that the vehicle storage building not only meets but surpasses the required air tightness specifications, enhancing its durability and operational efficiency.

    Graham Seage, Director of Defence and National Security at Mace, said:

    The completion of this state-of-the-art storage facility is a significant step forward in ensuring the long-term resilience of the British Army’s estate and assets. The level of collaboration across all partners to reach this milestone has been first rate and, importantly, has extended to teams working across the wider defence estate, drawing on lessons and experience from around the DIO portfolio to drive efficiencies and innovations.

    MOD Ashchurch is owned by Defence Equipment & Support (DE&S) and VSSP is due to complete at the site in 2027.

    Updates to this page

    Published 5 March 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: First steps made towards potential new watersports centre for Portsmouth

    Source: City of Portsmouth

    Kiteboarding championship trials off of Eastney Beach in Portsmouth – (Picture: Vernon Nash)

    Portsmouth has a potential opportunity to create a new watersports centre in the south-east of the city, on the site of the closed Eastney Swimming Pool. This ambition was set out in the Council’s Seafront Masterplan in 2013 and was also included in the updated plan in 2021.

    This area of the seafront has become a hotspot for kiteboarding and kitesurfing over the past decade, leading to the city hosting the Formula Kite European Championships in 2023.

    Creating a watersports centre will establish a hub for these sports, alongside others such as open water rowing, kayaking, and stand-up paddleboarding. Participants in these sports could have facilities to change, leave their valuables, and shower afterwards.

    It could also open an area of the seafront that has been previously inaccessible, allowing access to the listed World War II pillbox currently hidden on the site. The listed World War II anti-tank defences could also be sensitively incorporated into the design.

    The Council will be consulting with the public on what they would like to see as part of the centre. This could include a café, a restaurant, creative studios, or retail space as part of the mix of facilities on offer. The consultation will begin from April this year.

    Cllr Steve Pitt, Leader of Portsmouth City Council, said:

    “We have a real opportunity here to potentially create a watersports facility that the community can be proud of. With investment in a new leisure centre at Bransbury Park, renovation work at Mountbatten Centre, and the regeneration of Hilsea Lido, we are demonstrating that we are serious about sport in the city. I’m looking forward to hearing what facilities for watersports the public want to see in the future.”

    Eastney Swimming Pool, which is currently on the site, has been closed permanently since 2020. The poor condition of the building means that it presents a significant danger to staff and the public. Multiple surveys have shown the 120-year-old building is in very poor condition, with extensive structural issues with the walls and roof. The pool structure is cracked and is now filling up with groundwater.

    To renovate the building to make it safe to use for another purpose would be extremely expensive, not appropriate for a watersports centre, and a poor use of public money. Historic England has also declined to list the building on two occasions, as it does not have any special architectural and historic interest required for it to be listed.

    Following the decision made today, the Council will apply for planning permission to demolish this building. Brand new swimming facilities, including a learner pool, will be available in nearby Bransbury Park when the new leisure centre and GP surgery are completed in 2027.

    Feature image credit: Vernon Nash

    Frequently asked questions:

    Why can’t you just re-open the pool?

    Eastney Swimming Pool has closed permanently. As a standalone pool it needed considerable subsidy to keep it open, and the building is at the end of its life. It would cost many millions to re-open the existing building.

    Even if we did, it would not be able to accommodate a learner pool, modern changing facilities and a gym in the existing building. The gym is essential to the centre operating without a significant annual subsidy. The new facility at Bransbury Park, less than a mile away. should operate without significant subsidy and is the most cost-effective way to provide a new swimming pool for the local community.

    I’ve seen claims that a new leisure centre at Eastney will be half the cost of one at Bransbury Park. Is this true?

    No, and we do not know where this estimate has come from. To build the same building at Eastney would cost the same amount – if not more to account for flood protection.

    We do know that refurbishing Eastney Swimming Pool “as-is” would cost up to £8 million. However, even after this investment, the pool would:

    • Remain unsuitable for early stages swimming lessons.
    • Have significant accessibility issues.
    • Be inconvenient for residents, too far from local schools, and poorly served by public transport.
    • Still be an aging building with high ongoing maintenance costs and requiring substantial subsidies.

    This £8m estimate does not include additional facilities suggested in “alternative proposals” that have been floated online. These added a learner pool, new changing rooms, a GP surgery, an open-air pool and water sports facilities. Any project to provide these additional facilities on site would have to deal with the variable ground levels there, while integrating new buildings with old. It would have to address the poor accessibility of the existing building, its poor energy rating, the fact that the pool tank leaks, and that the building needs a new roof.

    It, like Bransbury Park, is also in a flood zone, but the existing building is set considerably lower in the ground. The most cost-effective way of dealing with these issues would be to demolish the existing building and build a whole new facility at a higher ground level. This would cost at least as much as building it at Bransbury Park, and probably more. It would also not fit on the footprint of the site.

    This demonstrates that the alternative proposals are uncosted, unfeasible, and unrealistic.

    While a new building at Bransbury Park does require significant upfront capital investment, it offers better value for residents in the long term by offering lower ongoing costs for the Council, reduced reliance on subsidies as a combined pool and fitness centre, and greater energy efficiency, with a substantial portion of its power generated by solar panels on the roof.

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Ministers Burke and Smyth welcome Government approval of roadmap for implementing the EU Artificial Intelligence Act

    Source: Government of Ireland – Department of Jobs Enterprise and Innovation

    On Tuesday, 4 March 2025, the Government approved a recommendation from Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment, Peter Burke, that Ireland adopt a distributed model of implementation of the EU Artificial Intelligence (AI) Act. This approach will build on the deep knowledge and expertise of the established sectoral regulators. The Government approved the designation of an initial list of eight public bodies as competent authorities, responsible for implementing and enforcing the Act within their respective sectors. These authorities are,

    • Central Bank of Ireland,
    • Commission for Communications Regulation,
    • Commission for Railway Regulation,
    • Competition and Consumer Protection Commission,
    • Data Protection Commission,
    • Health and Safety Authority,
    • Health Products Regulatory Authority,
    • Marine Survey Office of the Department of Transport.

    Additional authorities, and a lead regulator who will coordinate enforcement of the Act and provide a number of centralised functions, will be designated by a future Government decision to ensure comprehensive implementation of the Act.

    Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment, Peter Burke said,

    “AI presents Ireland with a strategic opportunity; it holds the prospect of major benefits for our economy and for our society. For business it can boost productivity, spur innovation and deliver better customer services; for the public it can provide enhanced public services; and for society, accelerated advances in science and medicine. It is a priority for me to ensure that we capture these benefits.

    “However, to capture these benefits, we must build trust in AI systems. For this reason, the landmark EU AI Act, the first in the world comprehensive regulation establishing guardrails for the safe and ethical use of AI, is a strategically important regulation for Ireland, as well as the EU. I am committed to an efficient and well-resourced implementation of the Act in Ireland, in a manner that provides the necessary safeguards, while spurring innovation for the benefit of our economy and our society.”

    Minister of State for Trade Promotion, Artificial Intelligence and Digital Transformation, Niamh Smyth said,

    “The decision by Government to use the existing national framework of well-established sectoral authorities for enforcement of the EU AI Act will make compliance with the AI Act easier for businesses. It is also an important step towards the commitment in the Programme for Government to make Ireland an EU centre of expertise for digital and data regulation for companies operating across the EU Digital Single Market. Providing an efficient, comprehensive, fair and transparent implementation of the Act in Ireland will enhance Ireland’s reputation for quality regulation and its competitiveness for attracting further investment in this burgeoning technology.”

    ENDS

    For Editors

    The EU AI Act establishes a harmonised regulatory framework for AI systems developed or deployed in the EU. It is designed to provide a high level of protection to people’s health, safety, and fundamental rights and to simultaneously promote the adoption of human-centric, trustworthy AI. The Act entered into force in August 2024 and its provisions apply, in a phased manner, over the period to August 2027.

    The Act is a horizontal instrument that applies to all sectors of the economy, both public and private. However, there are exemptions for applications of AI relating to national defence; national security; scientific R&D; R&D for AI systems, models; open-sourced models; and personal use.

    The Act is risk-based so that its provisions are targeted and proportionate – it is not a blanket instrument applying to all AI systems. Most AI systems are not subject to any regulatory requirements under the Act as they are low risk. In addition, the Act gives special consideration to the needs of SMEs and startups. This will ensure that the EU remains competitive for AI investment and innovation. The key elements of the Act are as follows:

    • Eight AI practices are prohibited from February 2025 due to the unacceptable risk they pose:
      • Subliminal techniques likely to cause that person, or another, significant harm,
      • Exploiting vulnerabilities due to age, disability or social or economic situation,
      • Social scoring leading to disproportionate detrimental or unfavourable treatment,
      • Profiling individuals for prediction of criminal activity,
      • Untargeted scraping of facial images,
      • Inferring emotions in workplaces or education institutions,
      • Biometric categorisation of race, religion, sexual orientation…,
      • Real-time remote biometric identification for law enforcement…
    • Stringent conditions must be satisfied by high-risk AI systems, by their providers, and by their deployers, in order for such systems to be placed on the market or put into use. The Act identifies two classes of high-risk systems: 
      1. AI systems that are part of the safety components of twelve specific product categories e.g. toys, machinery (applies from August 2027).
      2. AI systems in eight specific uses e.g. employment, education, in relation to essential public and private services such as financial, healthcare (applies from August 2026).
    • Transparency conditions are placed on providers and deployers of four categories of AI systems that give rise to lower-order risks, such as chatbots (applies from August 2026).
    • Providers of General Purpose AI (GPAI) models (foundation models) are subject to obligations to mitigate the substantial risks, including systemic risks, they pose due to their power and generality. These obligations will be enforced by the European Commission, but with the cooperation of Member States (applies from August 2025).
    • The penalties for infringements of the Act are substantial: fines of up to €35M or 7% global turnover

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Economics: First IADC Geothermal Conference Takes Place this Month!

    Source: International Association of Drilling Contractors – IADC

    Headline: First IADC Geothermal Conference Takes Place this Month!

    The first IADC Geothermal Drilling Conference & Exhibition will take place 25-26 March 2025 in Vienna, Austria. The program includes keynote presentations by: 

    This conference will focus on Geothermal Upstream, which includes subsurface, drilling, production, completions, regulatory environment, and associated topics. As a participant, you will gain insights into relevant business and ownership models, contracting and procurement strategies, and supply chains.

    This event will showcase groundbreaking technologies with the potential to revolutionize the geothermal industry and the entire energy sector. IADC’s expertise in providing definitions and guidelines for the Petroleum Upstream ideally positions it to establish a vocabulary, terms, and standards within the geothermal industry.

    Geothermal energy regulatory regimes are inconsistent, and immature compared to those of the oil and gas industry, which creates obstacles and extends the lead time for geothermal projects. The conference will analyze differences in regulatory regimes and provide valuable insights for businesses and regulators.

    Don’t miss out on this opportunity to shape a more reliable and clean future for the energy industry. Join the IADC Geothermal Drilling Conference & Exhibition to discuss the exciting developments happening in the upstream aspects of geothermal energy production and the issues to be addressed. Be a part of the transformation that the geothermal industry has the potential to bring to the entire energy sector.

    MIL OSI Economics

  • MIL-OSI: VelocityEHS Redefines Excellence in Chemical Management Software in Analyst Report

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    CHICAGO, March 05, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — VelocityEHS, a global leader in enterprise EHS and ESG solutions, has been recognized as a market-leading chemicals management software provider in the latest Smart Innovators: Chemicals Management Software report conducted by Verdantix, an independent research firm.

    In a comprehensive assessment of 13 leading vendors, VelocityEHS achieved the highest overall score across key functional areas critical to chemical safety and compliance.

    “At VelocityEHS, we are dedicated to empowering organizations with the most effective, intuitive, and scalable solutions for managing chemical safety and compliance,” said VelocityEHS CEO Matt Airhart. “This recognition validates our commitment to helping companies navigate the increasingly complex regulatory landscape to improve worker health safety.”

    The Verdantix report evaluated providers across six core capabilities, with VelocityEHS earning high marks in four of the categories—earning a Market-Leading designation. In the remaining two categories, VelocityEHS was recognized as a Comprehensive Solution, further solidifying its position as an industry leader.

    Market Leading Capabilities

    Chemical Approvals & Inventory Tracking
    Facilitates streamlined approval workflows, real-time inventory tracking, and regulatory screening of chemical ingredients, helping companies maintain compliance and prevent unauthorized chemical use.

    Chemical Spill & Incident Management
    With the industry’s best spill response tools, Velocity enables real-time reporting, automated workflows, and corrective action tracking to mitigate chemical-related risks and improve workplace safety.

    Chemicals Management Compliance Reporting
    Simplifies compliance with Tier II, TRI, and other reporting frameworks by offering automated regulatory tracking and comprehensive data management, ensuring firms meet evolving chemical regulations.

    Hazard Communication & HazMat Labeling
    Provides advanced labeling capabilities, including built-in templates and automatic hazard classification based on SDS data, ensuring organizations remain compliant with global labeling standards such as GHS, OSHA, and WHMIS.

    Comprehensive Capabilities  

    Safety Data Sheet (SDS) Management
    Provides a robust SDS management solution, offering a centralized repository for SDSs, automated indexing, and multi-language support, ensuring organizations can easily access and update chemical safety information.

    Chemical Substitution & Toxicology Analyses
    By providing tools to identify safer alternatives to hazardous chemicals, VelocityEHS helps firms comply with regulations like REACH and TSCA while minimizing environmental and health risks. This commitment to safety and sustainability drives continues innovation, ensuring their solutions not only meet regulatory requirements but also support organizations’ broader EHS goals.

    A key example of this innovation is the recent enhancements to the Chemical Management solution, making it one of the first to align with OSHA’s Hazcom standard updates with Revision 7 of the UN’s Globally Harmonized Systems of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS). These updates ensure companies can adapt to evolving compliance requirements while maintaining workplace safety.

    The key changes include:

    • Revised classification criteria
    • Updated label provisions
    • Classification amendments
    • Additional updates to SDS information requirements
    • New provisions for concentration ranges claimed as trade secrets

    VelocityEHS proactively implemented these updates based on the final rule and insights from internal experts, ensuring that EHS professionals had the tools and capabilities exactly when they needed them most.

    “Another recent advancement, our new AI-powered SDS indexing tool, helps companies quickly access critical safety data, improving response times during incidents and potentially saving lives. It’s all about combining innovation with responsibility to create a safer, more efficient and human-centered future for EHS,” said Airhart.

    “Organizations need more than just compliance tools—they need intelligent, connected solutions that help them stay ahead of risks. That’s why we’ve integrated our Chemical Management solution onto the enhanced Accelerate Platform,” he added.

    Unifying Chemical Management with Safety, Industrial Ergonomics, and Operational Risk, Velocity empowers organizations to create reports and integrate data from multiple solutions, enabling them to proactively manage risks and drive safer, more sustainable operations.

    “As chemical regulations continue to expand, firms are turning to chemical management software to help guide them through the increasing complexities and keep pace with change. Chemicals management software vendors, such as VelocityEHS with its advanced technology, enable medium – to high-risk companies to streamline chemical management workflows and exceed compliance requirements,” says Zain Idris, Industry Analyst at Verdantix.

    To learn more about VelocityEHS Accelerate, visit www.ehs.com/accelerate/.

    About VelocityEHS

    Relied on by more than 10 million users worldwide to drive operational excellence and achieve outstanding outcomes, VelocityEHS is the global leader in true SaaS enterprise EHS & ESG technology. The VelocityEHS Accelerate® Platform is the definitive gold standard, delivering best-in-class software solutions for managing Safety, Ergonomics, Chemical Management, and Operational Risk. In addition, Velocity offers world-class applications for Contractor Safety & Permit to Work, Environmental Compliance, and ESG.

    The VelocityEHS team includes unparalleled industry expertise, with more certified experts in health, safety, industrial hygiene, ergonomics, sustainability, the environment, AI, and machine learning than any other EHS software provider. Recognized by the EHS industry’s top independent analysts as a Leader in the Verdantix 2025 Green Quadrant Analysis, VelocityEHS is committed to industry thought leadership and to accelerating the pace of innovation through its software solutions and vision. Its privacy and security protocols, which include SOC2 Type II attestation, are among the most stringent in the industry.

    VelocityEHS is headquartered in Chicago, Illinois, with locations in Ann Arbor, Michigan; Tampa, Florida; Oakville, Ontario; London, England; Perth, Western Australia; and Cork, Ireland. For more information, visit www.EHS.com. 

    About Verdantix

    Verdantix is the essential thought-leader for world-enhancing innovation. We support change-makers with our proprietary data, unique expertise and executive networks. Our impactful analysis is delivered via a digital platform, consulting engagements and in-person events to thousands of decision-makers in more than 100 countries. From offices in London, New York and Boston, the Verdantix research team applies the principles of rigour, accuracy and curiosity to help our globally distributed clients solve their most complex challenges. Verdantix.com.

    Media Contact

    Jennifer Sinkwitts

    jsinkwitts@ehs.com

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Called-in decision: land between junctions 7 and 8 of the M56, Tatton, Cheshire (ref: 3345318 – 5 March 2025)

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Correspondence

    Called-in decision: land between junctions 7 and 8 of the M56, Tatton, Cheshire (ref: 3345318 – 5 March 2025)

    Decision letter and Inspector’s Report for a called-in application.

    Applies to England

    Documents

    Called-in decision: land between junctions 7 and 8 of the M56, Tatton, Cheshire (ref: 3345318 – 5 March 2025)

    Request an accessible format.
    If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email alternativeformats@communities.gov.uk. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

    Details

    Decision letter and Inspector’s Report for a called-in application for erection of a Motorway Service Area (MSA), demolition of all existing buildings except for the retention and conversion of one residential building (existing farmhouse) and the part retention and conversion of the Eastern Barn for MSA operational purposes, including associated access and buildings (amenity building, MSA hotel and fuel filling station including photovoltaics and ancillary structures), service yard, parking for all categories of vehicle (including electric vehicle charging), open space, landscaping and planting, drainage, vehicular circulation, pedestrian and cycle links (including diversion of cycle track) and earthworks/enabling works.

    Updates to this page

    Published 5 March 2025

    Sign up for emails or print this page

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: There will be no let-up in the UK’s support to Ukraine: UK statement to the OSCE

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Speech

    There will be no let-up in the UK’s support to Ukraine: UK statement to the OSCE

    The UK sets out plan agreed with leaders in London on 2 March to work with Ukraine and the United States on a strong, just and durable peace.

    Thank you, Mr Chair.  On Sunday 2 March, the UK hosted in London leaders from various European countries and Canada, the NATO Secretary General and the Presidents of the EU Commission and the EU Council to discuss our support for Ukraine.

    Together we reaffirmed our determination to work for a permanent peace in Ukraine, in partnership with the United States.

    The UK Prime Minister made clear that we must not repeat the mistakes of the past when weak deals allowed President Putin to invade again.  The UK, France and our international partners will work closely with Ukraine on a plan to stop the fighting.  And we will work directly with the United States on a strong, just and lasting peace that ensures Ukraine’s sovereignty and security.

    The plan agreed with leaders in London has four clear principles.

    First, we must keep military aid flowing and keep increasing the economic pressure on Russia.  To that end, we are doubling down on military aid.  At the weekend the UK agreed a new £2.2 billion loan for Ukraine, backed by profits from frozen Russian assets.

    Second, we agreed that any lasting peace must guarantee Ukraine’s sovereignty and security – and that Ukraine must be at the table when negotiating their future.

    Third, in the event of a peace deal, we would continue boosting Ukraine’s own defensive capabilities to deter any future invasion.

    And lastly, we will develop a “coalition of the willing” to defend a deal in Ukraine and to guarantee the peace. Those willing to contribute will intensify planning now.

    Mr Chair, Ukraine has been clear that it wants to reach a durable peace as soon as possible. This can happen only if we continue to show strength and provide Ukraine with the support it needs to defend itself against continued Russian aggression. There will be no let-up in the UK’s support, which we will continue for as long as it is necessary.

    Updates to this page

    Published 5 March 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: More rights for victims of crime

    Source: Scottish Government

    Notification scheme to be expanded.

    More crime victims will get access to a range of information about the perpetrator and have a say on decisions about their prison release under newly unveiled justice reforms.

    Currently victims can register with the Victim Notification Scheme (VNS) if the offender in their case has been sentenced to 18 months or more in prison, or with the Victim Information Scheme if the sentence was less than 18 months. Under Scottish Government proposals to be considered by the Scottish Parliament, all victims will be able to register under one programme with the same right rights and same access to information, regardless of the length of the offender’s prison sentence.

    A further proposal, if approved by MSPs, would give all victims the right to make representations where an offender is being considered for release on licence – and on the licence conditions they would like to see imposed. Currently this entitlement only applies where an offender was sentenced to four years or more in custody.

    Improvements are also proposed to the range of information available through the VNS for victims of offenders in the forensic mental health system who are subject to a compulsion order and restriction order.

    The plans build on previously announced proposed reforms to the Victim Notification Scheme that will create a new Victim Contact Team to give personalised support based on a victim’s individual needs.

    The latest plans are being introduced as proposed amendments to the Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill, the next stage of which begins in the Scottish Parliament next week.

    Victims Minister Siobhian Brown said:

    “These reforms will put victims’ rights at the heart of the justice system. Victims of crime will be able to sign up to one simplified notification scheme that allows them to receive information about the offenders and, if they wish, to have a say in decisions being made about the offenders, including their release. These changes recognise that a victim’s rights should not hinge on the length of sentence that the perpetrator is serving.

    “One system will be easier for victims to navigate and this change will add to a raft of proposed reforms to the VNS, including the creation of a new Victim Contact Team.  We want victims to know their rights to receive information and to be supported to make informed choices on whether they wish to do so. We will continue to work closely with victims’ representatives as we take forward these reforms.”

     Background

    The Victim Notification Scheme (VNS) entitles victims of offenders sentenced to 18 months of more (or close relatives of those victims) to certain information about the person responsible for the crime, such as the date of the offender’s release or if they are eligible for temporary release, such as for training, work or home leave.

    For those who register, Part 2 of the VNS gives victims, or in certain cases the victim’s representative, the right to contribute to decisions taken whilst the offender is in prison or detained in hospital. This includes the right to make representations about the release of the offender.

    The Victim Information Scheme (VIS) is available for victims of offenders who are sentenced to less than 18 months’ imprisonment. Victims who sign up to the VIS are currently entitled to know only the date of the release or escape of the offender.

    The planned reforms to the VNS form part of the Scottish Government’s response to the Independent Review of the Victim Notification Scheme, which heard directly from victims about their experiences of the justice system and the VNS.

    Victim Notification Scheme: guidance for victims of crime

    A separate notification scheme exists for victims of offenders with a mental disorder.

    Scottish Government response to the Independent Review of the Victim Notification Scheme

    Victim Notification Scheme: Independent Review

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI Economics: All Intelligent Operations Enables New Growth

    Source: Huawei

    Headline: All Intelligent Operations Enables New Growth

    [Barcelona, Spain, March 5, 2025] Huawei, together with global operators, partners, and industry organizations, discussed how operators can upgrade their operations models, reimagine new experiences, and enable new growth at the Intelligent Operations Summit held during MWC Barcelona 2025. Bruce Xun, President of Huawei Global Technical Service, said, “In the next decade, operators will advance towards all intelligent operations at an unprecedented pace. Through in-depth integration of ‘digital twins’ and ‘GenAI+ Predictive AI’, a new operations model that features collaboration between human and AI agents will be built to realize value in specific scenarios along the end-user journey and operators’ value stream.”
    Bruce Xun, President of Huawei Global Technical Service, delivering a keynote speech

    Customer Journey: Rich Digital Intelligence Services with a Reimagined End-to-End NPS Journey
    Operators leverage Mobile Money and AI applications to create a digital intelligence life entry, offering users a wide range of digital and intelligent services and novel experiences. In Africa, Huawei Mobile Money helped an operator expand its business scope from mobile payment to mobile finance. In 2024, the operator’s revenue from mobile finance exceeded US$900 million. In addition, certain operators have re-energized their end-to-end NPS journey with digital twins and AI. In Asia Pacific, Huawei has helped a customer streamline the process and data breakpoints between AICC and SmartCare through multi-agent collaboration. This resulted in a 30% decrease in user complaints and an improvement in service NPS. In China, Huawei collaborated with an operator to build N-NPS leading network, reducing detractors by 20% and improving the network NPS by 8%.
    Value Stream Journey: Building a 3A Cognitive Network to Monetize Differentiated Experiences
    In addition to delivering a leading network experience, Huawei has created a 3A cognitive network that features real-time service awareness, achievable KPIs/KQIs, and differentiated experience assurance. Converged data and AI are used to accurately identify user profiles, allowing operators to promote the right offer to the right people through the right channel at the right time. This shifts the operations focus from traffic monetization to valuable traffic + experience monetization. Additionally, spatiotemporal digital twins enable transformation from best-effort to differentiated experience assurance for high-value scenarios and services. Huawei has helped an operator build the best driver experience network tailored for delivery drivers. With the network, the operator sold packages to 380,000 delivery drivers and achieved a 6% rise in revenue in only one quarter. Leveraging the SRCON spatiotemporal digital twin, Huawei assisted an operator in building the best live streamer experience network, elevating the uplink rate from 3 Mbit/s to over 5 Mbit/s.
    Value Stream Journey: Upgrading Operations Mode, Transforming from Cost-based to Value-oriented Operations
    The increasingly diverse service scenarios and complex network structures pose higher requirements on network stability and operations. The operations model, which depends on people and tools, needs to evolve to depend on people and AI agents. The ultimate goal is to improve both efficiency and effectiveness, and realize transformation from cost-based to value-orientated operations. Huawei collaborated with an operator to establish a Digital Intelligence Operation Center (DIOC). Through the synergy of Huawei NOC, SOC, NPM, traffic loss reduced by 8.4%, and the operator’s network ranked No. 1 in third-party-tested video and gaming experiences in a country of Asia. In addition, Huawei FME copilot has helped an operator reduce unnecessary site visits and shorten MTTR by 30%.
    At the end of his speech, Bruce Xun stated that, to seize the opportunities of all intelligence, operators need to build three major elements: collaboration between people and AI agents, real-time data awareness, and a high-quality chain of thought (CoT) corpus. In addition, the CoT capabilities of GenAI+ Predictive AI need to be combined with the real-time simulation capabilities of digital twins to truly solve scenario-specific problems and realize value, rather than just answering questions. The future is now. Huawei is ready to collaborate with global operators to expedite the transition towards all intelligent operations and enable new growth.
    MWC Barcelona 2025 will be held from March 3 to March 6 in Barcelona, Spain. During the event, Huawei will showcase its latest products and solutions at stand 1H50 in Fira Gran Via Hall 1. In 2025, commercial 5G-Advanced deployment will accelerate, and AI will help carriers reshape business, infrastructure, and O&M. Huawei is actively working with carriers and partners around the world to accelerate the transition towards an intelligent world. For more information, please visit: https://carrier.huawei.com/en/events/mwc2025

    MIL OSI Economics

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: UKHSA appoints new Chief Operating Officer

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    News story

    UKHSA appoints new Chief Operating Officer

    Dyfed Alsop joins UKHSA as new Chief Operating Officer and Deputy CEO from the Welsh Revenue Authority (WRA)

    Dyfed Alsop has been appointed as UKHSA’s new Chief Operating Officer and Deputy Chief Executive Officer, starting 1 May 2025.

    He has already begun working with UKHSA, attending meetings and building relationships across the agency, ahead of his formal start date later in the year.

    Dyfed joins UKHSA from the Welsh Revenue Authority (WRA), where he served as Chief Executive since 2017.

    He will work alongside UKHSA Chief Executive Jenny Harries and the Executive Committee over the coming months to ensure continuity of leadership and operations ahead of Jenny Harries’ departure in early summer. 

    As Deputy Chief Executive, Dyfed will cover the CEO role until a new chief executive is appointed.

    UKHSA Chief Executive Jenny Harries said:

    I am absolutely delighted to welcome Dyfed to our organisation as Chief Operating Officer and Deputy CEO. His extensive experience in public and private sectors, combined with his strong track record in delivering transformation and managing complex operations, makes him ideally suited for this role.  Dyfed’s appointment strengthens our Executive Committee team and his expertise and leadership style will be invaluable as we continue to develop our people, embed a new culture and grow our organisation.

    Dyfed Alsop said:

    I’m delighted to be joining UKHSA at such an interesting time in the organisation’s development. I’m looking forward to getting out and about to meet people and learn more about the important work that UKHSA does.

    I’m passionate about public service and the potential we have collectively to make a difference. I can’t wait to get started.

    Dyfed has held senior leadership positions across government, including the Valuation Office Agency, HM Treasury and HM Revenue & Customs.

    Updates to this page

    Published 5 March 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Maintenance begins across several Recreational Areas

    Source: City of Preston

    5 March 2025

    Maintenance has begun across several Preston Recreational Areas

    Maintenance has begun across several play areas in Preston and will be ongoing throughout the month of March.

    The work includes painting play equipment, ball court fencing and Multi Use Games Areas (MUGAs), and is being carried out by Holden Building Solutions.

    What sites will the maintenance take place

    The maintenance will take place at the following sites;

    • Summer Trees Avenue
    • Conway Park
    • Garstang Road
    • Meadow Park
    • Brookfield MUGA
    • Oxheys Recreational Ground
    • Barlow Street
    • Haighton Drive
    • Williams Lane
    • Haslam Park MUGA
    • Moor Park MUGA
    • Frenchwood MUGA
    • Fishwick MUGA

    The play areas will be temporarily closed whilst work is being carried out. All work should be completed by the end of March, weather dependent.

    This project is funded by the UK Shared Prosperity Fund.

    Share this page

    Print

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: The Box gets ready for a ‘Super Saturday’

    Source: City of Plymouth

    Staff at The Box are busy preparing for a busy day on 8 March, when it will be hosting a ‘Super Saturday’ to mark the final weekend of one of its current exhibitions.

    ‘Osman Yousefzada: When will we be good enough?’ has been on display since early November and comes to a close at 5pm this Sunday. The powerful, thought-provoking exhibition includes textiles, film, sculpture and clever use of found objects, and explores ideas of power across the ages.

    The ‘Super Saturday’ will delve into different themes in the exhibition throughout the day with a series of events for different ages and interests.

    Osman’s South Asian heritage has inspired a free family-friendly drop-in which will be on offer from 10.30am to 12.30pm (last entries at 12.15pm) and where children can decorate tote bags to take home using Indian prints and sparkles.

    Osman will be in conversation with internationally-acclaimed author and curator Gemma Rolls-Bentley from 11.30am to 1pm. Gemma’s debut book ‘Queer Art: From Canvas to Club and the Spaces Between’ was published last spring and has been highlighted as a must-read by Them, Dazed, Timeout, The Guardian, Cultured and the FT. In Osman’s exhibition, queer communities are presented as spaces of resistance, providing hope of an alternative future and a means of escape from past and present power structures. Together, Gemma and Osman will explore his exhibition through a queer lens.

    ‘When will we be good enough?’ features three newly created busts of today’s digital ‘overlords’ Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos and Mark Zuckerberg. In the afternoon, the focus will be on digital in a fascinating artist-led workshop led by Yudi Wu where participants will be able to learn more about how our data is currently being used, and how to better protect any creative content they share online. The workshop will run from 2pm to 4pm.

    The ‘Super Saturday’ will finish with a talk by Wonderzoo that will highlight the untold stories of some of the many people who have made an impact on Plymouth. Jimmy Peters, the first black rugby player to play for England, Bill Miller, the first black Labour councillor in Plymouth and Ann Wilkinson, a black activist who co-founded the city’s Respect Festival will be the focus of ‘Exploring Plymouth’s Hidden Figures’ from 2.30pm to 4pm.

    ‘Super Saturdays’ are set to be a regular feature at The Box over the next few months, taking place at the start of each month with a wide range of talks, workshops and activities that really celebrate the exhibition programme. The Box is already planning future events for Saturday 5 April, all of which will be themed around its popular ‘Planet Ocean’ exhibition.

    More information and ticket booking links for the Gemma Rolls-Bentley and Osman Yousefzada ‘In Conversation’ and Yudi Wu’s ‘Digital Resilience’ workshop are available from theboxplymouth.com. Further details about the Ramadan Tote Bag drop-in and ‘Exploring Plymouth’s Hidden Figures’ talk, both of which are free with no need to book, can also be found online.

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Come along and enjoy some Culture in the Park in Banbridge!

    Source: Northern Ireland City of Armagh

    A vibrant, family-friendly event that celebrates the rich diversity of shared cultures within our community will be taking place in Solitude Park, Banbridge on Saturday 29 March from 4pm to 7pm.

    Culture in the Park is a great way to come together and embrace the traditions and experiences that make us who we are, as well as being a wonderful opportunity to build connections and explore the beauty of different cultures, while celebrating the things we have in common.

    This exciting event will feature a wide range of music, dancing, food stalls, crafts and lots more for everyone to enjoy and get involved in!

    From Irish Dancing to an Afro-Caribbean Band, Japanese Origami to Chinese Calligraphy as well as delicious food stalls offering a variety of flavours, this is an event not to be missed!

    “I am really looking forward to Culture in the Park and it will have something for everyone to enjoy – adults and children alike!” commented Councillor Peter Haire, Vice Chair of the Community and Wellbeing Committee.

    “With live performances showcasing music and dance as well as interactive workshops and plenty of tasty food, come along and soak up the atmosphere and enjoy a day out with the family!”

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Former Austins building acquired by Inner City Trust

    Source: Northern Ireland – City of Derry

    Former Austins building acquired by Inner City Trust

    5 March 2025

    The Mayor of Derry and Strabane, Councillor Lilian Seenoi-Barr, has welcomed the announcement from the Department for Communities today of £1.2m investment which has resulted in the Inner City Trust (ICT) securing ownership of the former Austins Department Store building in Derry.  The acquisition is part of a conservation led regeneration plan that has been developed by the Department for Communities, with the acquisition valued at approximately £1.2m.

    The project will see the Inner City Trust taking ownership of this significantly iconic historic Grade A listed building and will set in motion the pathway to secure further funding to fully restore and regenerate the building.

    The vision is to create an open and accessible space for everyone to utilise and enjoy, and to protect and preserve the beautifully designed architecture that has for so long been the central feature of Derry’s Diamond area.

    While the plans are still at the early stages, there is a real sense of positivity and ambition for this iconic city landmark located within the heart of Derry’s historic Walled City. Any proposals will be subject to wider engagement and a due diligence process, but the focus will be on recreating a city centre focal point which will attract footfall and vibrancy to the Diamond and wider Walled City area and appeal to a wide range of audiences.

    Robert Millar, chair of Inner City Trust said they were hugely honoured to have acquired this iconic building and are excited to be entrusted with the responsibility of refurbishing such an historic and iconic property in the heart of Derry City, and bring it back into public use.  He said: “The Austins building is greatly loved and admired by the people of Derry. It holds many happy memories for so many people. We are so proud to have acquired ownership of this beautiful property and to begin exploring how it can be restored and revitalised, and open its doors to the public once again.

    “We are excited to work in partnership with the Department for Communities on this significant project. Our priority in the regeneration of the building will be restoring it to the local community where it can be enjoyed by people of all ages, and securing its long-term future at the heart of the city centre.”

    Mayor of Derry City and Strabane District Council, Cllr Lilian Seenoi Barr, said Council welcomes the announcement today by the Department for Communities to secure the acquisition. “Council has a strategic interest in seeing this iconic building restored for the benefit of the historic Walled City.  We have been very proactive in working with stakeholders to identify ways to regenerate the property and in 2023 we set up the Austins Task Force and secured funding to commission a conservation-led condition assessment of the building to help enable this acquisition.

    “We will continue to work with the Inner City Trust and partners to ensure any future plans align with the strategic vision for the regeneration and revitalisation of the city centre and will complement our ambitious and exciting plans through the City Deal projects, in particular the Walled City project that will see the creation of reimagined spaces across the Walled City, and the re-imagining of the Diamond area.

    “Austins has been vacant for a period of time, and we are delighted with this strong commitment from the Department for Communities to invest in this building and then look forward to Inner City Trust restoring it for a sustainable and long-term use. I would like to extend my congratulations to the Department for Communities and Inner City Trust and all the partners for getting to this stage. Inner City Trust have an excellent track record when it comes to heritage-led restoration and regeneration and I look forward to seeing the Austins building back in public usage and regenerated to once again become a focal point in the city centre.”

    Robert Millar from Inner City Trust added now the acquisition is finalised, immediate essential maintenance will take place in advance of a more extensive proposed refurbishment programme of works to commence in the coming months.

    They added that they will also continue to work in partnership with the Department for Communities and Council and other key strategic partners to help secure the required funding package to fully restore and regenerate the building.

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Council to enhance its standards to improve residents’ experience

    Source: City of York

    City of York Council’s Executive will be asked to adopt new standards to support people living with poverty in the city, at a meeting later this month (11 March).

    The standards are set out in a Charter for Organisational Standards created by York Truth Poverty Commission and aim to make services more responsive to people’s needs rather than expecting them to navigate complex systems alone.

    The commission is made up of Community Commissioners – those with lived experience of poverty who’ve voluntarily given considerable time to the commission, and Civic Commissioners – representatives of organisations and bodies in the city responsible for providing public services.  

    The standards were created in response to learnings about the difficulties people who are in poverty with complex personal circumstances, such as those dealing with homelessness, mental health challenges or are disabled, are experiencing.

    Over the course of 12 months, Community Commissioners shared lived experience of existing culture, systems and processes affecting those in poverty, and focussed on what needed to change.

    The commissioners prioritised ‘To be treated with kindness, understanding, honesty and respect when accessing services’, as the scope of a set of conditions that would make the most difference to them whilst experiencing poverty.

    From these discussions the commissioners produced The ‘Charter for Organisational Standards – TOGETHER promoting dignity and respect for those facing poverty’, which was launched last year. Civic Commissioners, including those from the council, publicly pledged to adopt and integrate the charter into the working practices of their respective organisations and invited others to do the same, to make a significant difference to the people of York.

    At the March Executive meeting, councillors will be asked to approve four key organisational standards:

    • We listen
    • We are understanding
    • We are respectful and friendly
    • We are responsive, honest and care about getting you the right support.

    Pledging the council’s backing for the standards will further support its vision to establish a culture and conditions that would make York a healthier, fairer, more affordable, more sustainable and more accessible place, where everyone feels valued. In addition, it will support the ongoing work to co-produce a 10 year Anti-Poverty strategy with residents and partners across the city.

    It will also reinforce the council’s role in removing barriers to make it easier for residents to engage with the authority and other partners across the city.

    Cllr Katie Lomas, City of York Council’s Executive Member for, Performance, Major Projects, Human Rights, Equality and Inclusion, said:

    York Poverty Truth Commission’s work is vital in helping us to make York a fairer, more equitable city for all our residents. I want to thank all Commissioners for giving their time to developing these standards.

    “It’s only by truly understanding the experiences of people living with poverty in York that we can help to provide the support they need, in the ways they need it most.

    “These standards challenge organisations to reflect and think about how they engage, invite contact and respond to requests for help from York residents.  Only by doing this will they be able to confidently say they are providing inclusive services for each and every resident

    Councillors will also receive an update on the work of York Poverty Truth Commission, which launched in 2023.

    More information about the Charter for Organisational Standards is available at https://www.yorkcvs.org.uk/york-poverty-truth-commission/

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI: Baltic Horizon Fund General Meeting – notice to investors

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    At the request of a unitholder whose units represent more than 1/10 of all the votes, Northern Horizon Capital AS invites Baltic Horizon Fund unit-holders and Swedish Depositary Receipt (hereinafter the “SDR”) holders (hereinafter together the “Investors”) to attend an extraordinary General Meeting (hereinafter the “General Meeting”) of Baltic Horizon Fund on 27 March 2025 at 14:00 (local Estonian time) at the office of Northern Horizon Capital AS at Roseni 7 (A tower), 6th floor, 10111 Tallinn, Estonia. Registration for the meeting will begin at 13:00. The General Meeting will be held in English.

    The meeting is convened in accordance with sections 10.3.3., 10.5, 10.6 and 11.2 of the Rules of Baltic Horizon Fund and section 47-1 of the Investment Funds Act of Estonia.

    The total number of units and votes in Baltic Horizon Fund amounts to 143,562,514 .

    Investors may also join the webinar to view the General Meeting online on 27 March 2025 at 14:00.

    To join the webinar, please register via the following link: https://nasdaq.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_Cd4HF9QwQpaCuPaPa5etOA.

    You will be provided with the webinar link and instructions how to join successfully. The webinar will be recorded and available online for everyone at the company’s website on www.baltichorizon.com.

    Agenda, as proposed by the unitholder:

    1. Decision to elect Andrius Smaliukas as a new member of the supervisory board of Baltic Horizon Fund as of 1 May 2025 for a period of two years.
    2. Decision to elect Milda Dargužaitė as a new member of the supervisory board of Baltic Horizon Fund as of 1 May 2025 for a period of two years.
    3. Decision to elect Antanas Anskaitis as a new member of the supervisory board of Baltic Horizon Fund as of 1 May 2025 for a period of two years.
    4. Decision to pay remuneration to the chairman of the supervisory board for fulfilling obligations of the member of the supervisory board in the amount of EUR 36,000 per calendar year.
    5. Decision to pay remuneration to supervisory board members, other than  the chairman, for fulfilling obligations of the member of the supervisory board in the amount of EUR 11,000 per calendar year.
    6. Decision to recall Reimo Hammerberg, Monica Hammer and David Bergendahl from the position of the supervisory board member of Baltic Horizon Fund with the last date of the office being 30 April 2025.

    Investors are invited to send questions and comments on the agenda to the Baltic Horizon fund manager at Tarmo.Karotam@nh-cap.com by 20 March 2025. Northern Horizon Capital AS will respond to the questions and comments at the meeting itself.

    Participation – requirements and notice

    Investors who are entered in the Baltic Horizon Fund registry of unit-holders maintained by Nasdaq CSD SE and holders of SDRs registered in the Euroclear Sweden AB system ten days before the date of the General Meeting, i.e. at the end of business of Nasdaq CSD SE on 17 March 2025, are entitled to participate in the meeting.

    In order to facilitate the registration process, investors whose units are registered in their own name are invited to provide notice of their attendance by 24 March 2025 to bhfmeeting@nh-cap.com. Notice should include name, personal identification number (or the registration number of the legal person), address, number of units represented and, if applicable attendance of any representatives, along with the name and personal identification number of the representatives. The attendance of a representative does not deprive the unit-holder of the right to participate at the meeting.

    Instructions to holders of Baltic Horizon Fund SDRs registered with Euroclear Sweden AB in Sweden

    IMPORTANT REQUIREMENT: SDR holders whose SDR-s are registered with Euroclear Sweden AB via a bank or other nominee are required to notify their bank or nominee account provider by 17 March 2025 to temporarily add their name on the Euroclear Sweden AB owner register.

    Notice of participation should also be sent by 16:00 EET on 24 March 2025 to bhfmeeting@nh-cap.com. Notice should include name, personal identification number (or the registration number of the legal person), address, number of units represented and, if applicable, attendance of any representatives, along with the name and personal identification number of the representatives. The attendance of a representative does not deprive the Investor of the right to participate at the meeting.

    Representation under a power of attorney

    Investors whose representatives are acting under a power of attorney are requested to prepare a written power of attorney for the representative in Estonian or English (templates can be found at Annex 1).

    A copy of the executed power of attorney should be sent to bhfmeeting@nh-cap.com together with the notice of participation. In case the power of attorney is issued by a legal person, a certified copy of the registration certificate (or equivalent certificate of authority) shall also be submitted together with, as applicable, the documents certifying the authority of the representative in case the power of attorney is signed by a person under a power of attorney.

    Baltic Horizon Fund is registered in Estonia, which means that any power of attorney (or any certified copy of the registration certificate of a legal person) issued in a foreign country should be notarised and accompanied by an apostille. The apostille requirement applies, for example, to powers of attorney issued and notarised in Sweden or Finland. 

    Instructions for the day of the General Meeting

    We kindly ask Investors to bring a personal identification document, and for their representatives also to present the original written power of attorney in English or Estonian. In case the Investor is a legal person, documentation in Estonian or English certifying the authority of the Investor’s representative or the signatory of the power of attorney will also be requested.

    Data collected by Northern Horizon Capital AS from powers of attorney, the unitholders registry maintained by Nasdaq CSD SE, and the list of holders of SDRs registered in the Euroclear Sweden AB system will be used for the purpose of registration for the meeting.

    1. Decision to elect Andrius Smaliukas as a new member of the supervisory board of the Baltic Horizon Fund

    According to section 11.2 of the Rules of Baltic Horizon Fund the members of the supervisory board shall be appointed at the general meeting for a period of at least two years. The  proposal is to elect Andrius Smaliukas as a new member of the supervisory board.

    Dr. Smaliukas is the Managing Partner at MMSP, a Lithuanian law firm focused on strategic corporate advisory and dispute resolution. He previously partnered at one of the leading Pan-Baltic firm, Valiunas Ellex, and holds nearly 20 years of experience as an arbitrator and international arbitration lead counsel. Dr. Smaliukas earned his Ph.D. and Master of Laws from Vilnius University, conducted postgraduate research at Oxford, and completed executive programs at Cambridge Judge Business School and Harvard Law School. Dr.Smaliukas serves on the boards of Staticus Group, Kesko Senukai, has extensive advisory experience in commercial real estate M&A and investment management across the Baltic countries.

    Andrius Smaliukas does not hold any units of the Baltic Horizon Fund.

    1. Decision to elect Milda Dargužaitė as a new member of the supervisory board of the Baltic Horizon Fund

    According to section 11.2 of the Rules of Baltic Horizon Fund the members of the supervisory board shall be appointed at the general meeting for a period of at least two years. The proposal is to elect Milda Dargužaitė as a new member of the supervisory board.

    Milda Dargužaitė is the former CEO of Northern Horizon Capital A/S, the shareholder of Northern Horizon Capital AS. She was responsible for managing the company’s operations and strategic direction, including the development of new funds and investment vehicles. Milda has significant experience in both the public and private sectors, locally and internationally. She joined the company in 2018 after roles as the Chancellor at the Lithuanian Prime Minister’s Office, Managing Director of Invest Lithuania, and advisor to the Lithuanian Minister of Economy. Milda has a wealth of experience in finance and portfolio management from her time at Goldman Sachs in New York and Barclays in London. Milda Dargužaitė was the supervisory board member of Northern Horizon Capital AS from July 2018 until September 2023.

    Milda holds a bachelor’s degree in Mathematics and Economics from Middlebury College and a master’s degree in Operations Research and Financial Engineering from Princeton University. She has served on the boards of several Northern Horizon Group entities.

    Milda Dargužaitė does not hold any units of the Baltic Horizon Fund.

    1. Decision to elect Antanas Anskaitis as a new member of the supervisory board of the Baltic Horizon Fund

    According to section 11.2 of the Rules of Baltic Horizon Fund the members of the supervisory board shall be appointed at the general meeting for a period of at least two years. The proposal is to elect Antanas Anskaitis as a new member of the supervisory board.

    Antanas Anskaitis is a partner at Grinvest which is a private investment company with interests in real estate and transportation. Antanas has over 20 years of real estate investment management experience (out of which 16 within Northern Horizon Capital group). Since 2015 until 2020 Antanas managed a successful Baltic-Polish investment portfolio on behalf of Partners Group and lead over 30 commercial property transactions in the Baltics and Poland having experience both on sell and buy side. Antanas has MSc in Management and Economics.

    Grinvest through its subsidiary in Estonia Gene Investments OÜ is the largest unitholder in Baltic Horizon Fund (>25%) at the time of this notice.

    1. Decision to pay remuneration to the chairman of the supervisory board

    According to section 11.11 of the Rules of Baltic Horizon Fund, supervisory board members are entitled to remuneration for their service. The amount of remuneration payable to the chairman and members of the supervisory board shall be decided at the general meeting. According to section 11.4 of the Rules of Baltic Horizon Fund, supervisory board members elect a chairman from among themselves in the first meeting after election of any new member(s).

    The supervisory board in this composition intends working in close liaison with Northern Horizon Capital AS in the subcommittees and meet at least once a month while Baltic Horizon Fund is in the turnaround phase. The proposal is therefore to pay remuneration to the chairman of the supervisory board in the amount of EUR 36,000 per calendar year.

    1. Decision to pay remuneration to supervisory board members

    According to section 11.11 of the Rules of Baltic Horizon Fund, supervisory board members are entitled to remuneration for their service. The amount of remuneration payable to the chairman and members of the supervisory board shall be decided at the general meeting. 

    The proposed remuneration is the same as for the current members of the supervisory board. The unitholder proposes to remunerate each supervisory board member (except the chairman, who shall be remunerated in accordance with point 4 above) in the amount of EUR 11,000 per calendar year.

    1. Decision to recall Reimo Hammerberg, Monica Hammer and David Bergendahl from the position of the supervisory board member of Baltic Horizon Fund

    According to section 10.3.3 of the Rules of Baltic Horizon Fund the members of the supervisory board shall be recalled at the general meeting.

    Annex 1:

    Form of power of attorney to appoint a representative for the general meeting (in Estonian)

    Form of power of attorney to appoint a representative for the general meeting (in English)

    For additional information, please contact:

    Tarmo Karotam
    Baltic Horizon Fund manager
    E-mail tarmo.karotam@nh-cap.com
    www.baltichorizon.com

    The Fund is a registered contractual public closed-end real estate fund that is managed by Alternative Investment Fund Manager license holder Northern Horizon Capital AS. 

    Distribution: GlobeNewswire, Nasdaq Tallinn, Nasdaq Stockholm, www.baltichorizon.com

    To receive Nasdaq announcements and news from Baltic Horizon Fund about its projects, plans and more, register on www.baltichorizon.com. You can also follow Baltic Horizon Fund on www.baltichorizon.com and on LinkedIn, FacebookX and YouTube.

    Attachments

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI: Trust Stamp ® announces the achievement of the D-seal

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    COPENHAGEN, March 05, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Trust Stamp (Nasdaq: IDAI), the Privacy-First Identity Company™, has been awarded the D-seal, a recognized label for IT security and responsible data usage. The D-seal is the first of its kind to combine IT security and responsible data usage into a single label. This milestone further solidifies Trust Stamp’s leadership in delivering ethical, privacy-preserving digital identity solutions, particularly in humanitarian aid, financial inclusion, and public sector services, assuring these organizations that Trust Stamp’s privacy-first solutions meet the highest ethical and security standards. By voluntarily undergoing the comprehensive evaluation of the D-seal, Trust Stamp has demonstrated its unwavering commitment to responsible digital practices.

    By adhering to the values of D-seal such as IT security, privacy, and responsible use of data, it can bring a shift to the humanitarian sector. The humanitarian sector has historically prioritized efficiency and fraud prevention over privacy, often collecting and storing vast amounts of biometric data without adequate safeguards. As a result, vulnerable populations face increased risks of data breaches, misuse, and unintended surveillance.
     
    By voluntarily undergoing the comprehensive evaluation of the D-seal, Trust Stamp reinforces its longstanding commitment to responsible digital practices, and continues to lead the way—enhancing fraud prevention and operational efficiency while ensuring the protection of individual rights.  Likewise, in financial inclusion, where billions remain unbanked due to a lack of verifiable identity, Trust Stamp’s privacy-preserving technology empowers individuals with secure, interoperable, and responsible identity solutions that open doors to financial services while minimizing risks of misuse or exploitation.

    Beyond humanitarian and financial sectors, Trust Stamp’s commitment to ethical, secure, and interoperable identity solutions also extends to governments seeking to modernize their digital infrastructure without falling into the trap of vendor lock-in, a significant challenge, especially for developing nations. The achievement of the D-seal aligns with Trust Stamp’s commitment to breaking vendor lock-in and ensuring secure, ethical, and interoperable digital identity solutions. By leveraging privacy-preserving technologies that are adaptable and vendor-agnostic, Trust Stamp empowers public sector entities, as well as the humanitarian and financial sectors —to enhance security, efficiency, and inclusivity without being constrained by proprietary systems removing the constraints of vendor lock-in. This approach not only fosters innovation, it ensures that governments can implement sustainable and future-proof identity solutions that serve their citizens without compromising autonomy or security.

    Scott Francis, Group Chief Technology Officer at Trust Stamp, stated:

    “Receiving the D-seal certification underscores our commitment to security, privacy, and ethical data practices—values that are deeply embedded in our mission to break the cycle of vendor lock-in. The D-seal’s emphasis on IT security and responsible data usage aligns with our approach to interoperability, ensuring that identity solutions remain secure, privacy-preserving, but also interoperable. As interoperability in facial biometrics is non-existent today our recent patent addresses that gap, as it allows users to obtain and compare biometric samples across different vendors. By creating an open-format standard, we empower organizations to implement secure and scalable identity solutions .”

    The D-seal achievement reaffirms a commitment to secure, privacy-first identity verification with interoperable, vendor-agnostic solutions that promote financial inclusion and tackle critical challenges in humanitarian and public sectors, fostering a digital identity ecosystem founded on privacy, trust, and accessibility.

    For more information about Trust Stamp’s privacy-first identity solutions, visit www.truststamp.ai.

    Inquiries

    Trust Stamp                                                   Email: Shareholders@truststamp.ai 
    Jonathan Patscheider
    President, Trust Stamp Denmark

    About Trust Stamp

    Trust Stamp the Privacy-First Identity CompanyTM, is a global provider of AI-powered identity services for use in multiple sectors including banking and finance, regulatory compliance, government, real estate, communications, and humanitarian services. Its technology empowers organizations with advanced biometric identity solutions that reduce fraud, protect personal data privacy, increase operational efficiency, and reach a broader base of users worldwide through its unique data transformation and comparison capabilities.

    Located in six countries across North America, Europe, Asia, and Africa, Trust Stamp trades on the Nasdaq Capital Market (Nasdaq: IDAI). The company was founded in 2016 by Gareth Genner and Andrew Gowasack.

    Safe Harbor Statement: Caution Concerning Forward-Looking Remarks 

    All statements in this release that are not based on historical fact are “forward-looking statements” including within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and the provisions of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The information in this announcement may contain forward-looking statements and information related to, among other things, the company, its business plan and strategy, and its industry. These statements reflect management’s current views with respect to future events-based information currently available and are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause the company’s actual results to differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking statements. Investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date on which they are made. The company does not undertake any obligation to revise or update

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI Video: UK Call for evidence launched into remote and hybrid working in the UK

    Source: United Kingdom UK House of Lords (video statements)

    Since the pandemic, home-based working, or ‘working from home’, has become significantly more common.

    The House of Lords Home-based Working Committee has been set up to consider the challenges and opportunities of remote and hybrid working, including the impact on productivity, the wider economy and society.

    The committee wants to hear from you. Whether you’re an employer, employee, academic or organisation you can get involved.

    Share your views by 25 April https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/771/homebased-working-committee/news/205578/call-for-evidence-launched-into-remote-and-hybrid-working-in-the-uk/

    Catch-up on House of Lords business:

    Watch live events: https://parliamentlive.tv/Lords
    Read the latest news: https://www.parliament.uk/lords/

    Stay up to date with the House of Lords on social media:

    • X: https://twitter.com/UKHouseofLords
    • Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/houseoflords.parliament.uk
    • Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/UKHouseofLords/
    • Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/UKHouseofLords
    • Flickr: https://flickr.com/photos/ukhouseoflords/albums
    • LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-house-of-lords
    • Threads: https://www.threads.net/@UKHouseOfLords

    #HouseOfLords #UKParliament

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=si39qWllI00

    MIL OSI Video

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Director bans for husband-and-wife after furniture company took payments from customers for goods they never received

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Press release

    Director bans for husband-and-wife after furniture company took payments from customers for goods they never received

    The company went into liquidation owing customers at least £97,000

    • George and Williamina Hay were directors of furniture retailer DWH Trading Ltd in Aberdeenshire 

    • The company was in financial trouble in April 2023, having a number of outstanding orders from customers 

    • Despite knowing the financial situation of their company, the husband-and-wife took 55 more orders, most of which were not even placed with their suppliers 

    • Both have now been disqualified as company directors following investigations by the Insolvency Service 

    A husband-and-wife whose furniture company went into liquidation owing customers almost £100,000 have both been banned as company directors. 

    George and Williamina Hay were directors of DWH Trading Ltd, which sold adjustable beds and chairs, mostly to elderly and vulnerable customers, from their home address in Aberdeenshire. 

    The company was struggling financially by April 2023 but continued to take orders and payments from customers in the following six months before it entered liquidation. 

    Both directors should have known that the majority of these orders would never be fulfilled. 

    George Hay, 65, of Greenacres Crescent, Peterhead, was disqualified as a company director for seven years. 

    Williamina Hay, 61, of the same address, was also banned for seven years. 

    Mike Smith, Chief Investigator at the Insolvency Service, said: 

    George and Williamina Hay both took orders from customers in the six months before their company went into liquidation, most of which they knew would not be fulfilled. 

    Most of the customers they took these orders from were elderly and vulnerable. 

    Both George and Williamina Hay have fallen significantly short of the standards we expect of company directors which is why they have now been disqualified until March 2032.

    DWH Trading was established in March 2021 but in just over two years the company had serious cash flow issues. 

    At the start of April 2023, DWH Trading’s bank balance stood at less than £6,000 and the company had no other non-cash assets. 

    The company also had 13 outstanding orders from customers who had paid them £27,250. DWH Trading had not ordered the goods from its suppliers and the orders remained outstanding at liquidation. 

    Despite this, George and Williamina Hay allowed the company to take a further 55 orders from April 2023 until the company entered liquidation in October of that year. 

    A total of 42 of the 55 orders with a value of £69,750 were not placed with the company’s suppliers. 

    In one example, a pensioner from Stonehaven paid a £2,000 deposit to the company for an adjustable chair which was never ordered from the manufacturer.  

    Similarly, a customer from a village in west Aberdeenshire paid a £9,000 deposit for furniture which was never delivered. 

    Customers from as far away as Dundee and Elgin also ended up losing out. 

    The company owed a total of £143,340 to its creditors in liquidation. Insolvency Service investigators have found that at least £97,000 of this was owed to customers for stock which it did not order. 

    The Secretary of State for Business and Trade accepted disqualification undertakings from the pair, and their bans both started on Monday 3 March.  

    The undertakings prevent them from being involved in the promotion, formation or management of a company, without the permission of the court. 

    Further information 

    Updates to this page

    Published 5 March 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Government to unleash the North Sea’s clean energy future

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Press release

    Government to unleash the North Sea’s clean energy future

    The government is consulting on plans to put the North Sea at the heart of Britain’s clean energy future and drive economic growth.

    • UK government consults on plan to unleash the North Sea’s clean energy future and ensure prosperous and sustainable transition for oil and gas

    • this plan backs industry to make North Sea a world-leader in offshore industries, such as hydrogen, carbon capture and wind, as part of the government’s clean energy superpower mission

    • it also offers oil and gas industry long-term certainty on the fiscal landscape by ending the Energy Profits Levy and consulting on a new regime to boost investment in jobs and growth 

    • consultation gives certainty to industry about the lifespan of oil and gas projects by committing to maintain existing fields for their lifetime and work with business and communities on a managed transition, while implementing the commitment not to issue new licences to explore new fields 

    The government has today (Wednesday 5 March) launched a consultation that will put the North Sea – its communities, workers, businesses and supply chains – at the heart of Britain’s clean energy future to drive economic growth and deliver the Plan for Change.   

    This will support private investment into the technologies that will deliver the next generation of good jobs for North Sea workers, invest in local communities, cut carbon emissions and help the UK become energy secure.

    The consultation sets out the next steps in the government’s overarching objective for the North Sea to make it a world leading example of an offshore clean energy industry, building on the UK’s world-class oil and gas heritage. In addition to maintaining existing oil and gas fields, and continuing ongoing domestic production, which have been critical to the UK’s energy system and will continue to play an important role for decades to come, the government wants to boost the economy through the expansion of clean technologies, protecting the country’s energy security in the process. To achieve this, the government needs to ensure the oil and gas industry and its workers can take advantage of a clean energy future.

    Separately, HM Treasury and HM Revenue and Customs are confirming that the Energy Profits Levy will end in 2030. They are consulting on what a new regime could look like, to respond to any future shocks in oil and gas prices. The government will work closely with the sector and other stakeholders to develop an approach that protects jobs in existing and future industries and delivers a fair return for the nation, during times of unusually high prices. The government will ensure that the oil and gas industry has the long-term certainty it needs on the future fiscal landscape, helping to support investment and protect businesses and jobs now and for the future. 

    The government is committed to working with industry, communities, trade unions and wider organisations to develop a plan that will ensure a phased transition for the North Sea – creating tens of thousands more jobs in offshore renewables estimated by 2030.   

    The government recognises the call of workers and trade unions for a coordinated plan to protect good jobs, pay terms and conditions in the North Sea, and commits to shaping this plan with workers and unions. 

    The consultation also includes delivering the government’s commitment not to issue new licences to explore new oil and gas fields in the UK, in line with the science of what is required to keep global warming to 1.5 degrees. The consultation also engages with industry on how to manage existing fields, which will continue to make an important contribution during the clean energy transition, for the entirety of their lifespan.  

    This comes after the government has backed new investment into Scotland’s clean energy future, awarding £55.7 million to the Port of Cromarty Firth, securing critical facilities needed for the rapid development of new floating offshore wind farms and ensuring that they are built from the UK.

    By sprinting to achieve this mission, the UK can take back control of its energy and protect both family and national finances from fossil fuel price spikes – with cleaner, affordable, homegrown power. As part of this, Britain must also reduce its dependency on oil and gas, which leaves consumers exposed to unstable global energy markets, as its price is set on international markets.  

    Energy Secretary Ed Miliband said: 

    The North Sea will be at the heart of Britain’s energy future. For decades, its workers, businesses and communities have helped power our country and our world. 

    Oil and gas production will continue to play an important role and, as the world embraces the drive to clean energy, the North Sea can power our Plan for Change and clean energy future in the decades ahead.  

    This consultation is about a dialogue with North Sea communities – businesses, trade unions, workers, environmental groups and communities – to develop a plan that enables us to take advantage of the tremendous opportunities of the years ahead.

    Diversifying the North Sea industries while domestic production is managed for decades to come is key to protecting its jobs and investment in the long-term. Today’s consultation explores how to harness the North Sea’s existing infrastructure, natural assets and world-leading expertise to deploy new technologies – like hydrogen, carbon capture and storage, and renewables – to create skilled jobs, meet the UK’s climate obligations, and make the UK a clean energy superpower.  

    It is estimated that the offshore renewables workforce, including offshore wind, CCUS and hydrogen, could increase to between 70,000 and 138,000 in 2030, Meanwhile, an up-and-running carbon capture industry alone is expected to add around £5 billion per year of gross value to the UK economy by 2050. 

    New proposals could also see changes to the role of North Sea Transition Authority, as the regulator of UK oil and gas, offshore hydrogen, and carbon storage industries. This includes ensuring the authority has the regulatory framework it needs to support the government’s vision for the long-term future of the North Sea and enable an orderly and prosperous transition to clean energy.  

    The government has already taken rapid steps in accelerating clean energy industries – with the biggest ever investment in offshore wind and up to £21.7 billion in funding over the next 25 years for carbon capture and storage and hydrogen projects. This comes alongside the launch of Great British Energy, headquartered in Aberdeen, and the creation of a National Wealth Fund, both of which will unlock significant investment in clean power projects across the UK and help create thousands of skilled jobs. 

    The government has also consulted on revised environmental guidance offshore oil and gas projects and will respond to give certainty to the industry and enable developers to resume applying for consents for already-licensed projects. This follows a Supreme Court ruling last year that requires regulators to consider the impact of burning oil and gas – known as scope 3 emissions – in the Environmental Impact Assessment for new projects.

    Exchequer Secretary to the Treasury, James Murray, said: 

    We are committed to working together with the sector on the future of the North Sea by providing the stability they need to keep investing and supporting jobs across the country while ensuring they make a fair contribution at times of unusually high prices. 

    Tania Kumar, Net Zero Director, CBI said:

    The North Sea has long been a cornerstone of the UK’s energy sector and will continue to play a vital role in securing energy independence and transitioning to a low-carbon economy. Today’s consultations highlight the government’s commitment to a managed transition. Success hinges on our collaboration with communities, workers, and businesses to develop a practical plan.   

    Robust regulation and the pivotal role of the North Sea Transition Authority will be essential. The UK’s net zero economy is growing faster than the rest of the economy – the future is green growth and managing the transition away from fossil fuels to a clean energy future for the North Sea is vital to achieving it. 

    Dhara Vyas, CEO, Energy UK said: 

    Today’s announcement offers a positive step toward a just transition for offshore workers. The North Sea has been an engine of economic growth and energy security for the UK, but it’s critical to ensure pathways are available for offshore workers to transition to the low carbon industries of the future. The government has a sent a strong signal about the UK’s clean energy future, and the role the North Sea will continue to play in fostering clean technologies such as offshore wind, hydrogen, and carbon capture and storage. The clean energy mission can help ensure the North Sea’s best days are ahead of it, powering economic growth and enabling the UK to lead the way in the global clean industrial revolution. 

    David Whitehouse, Chief Executive, OEUK said:

    The UK offshore energy industry, including its oil and gas sector, is responsible for thousands of jobs across Scotland and the UK, and today the government has committed to meaningful consultation on the long-term future of our North Sea. That is important and welcomed. Energy policy underpins our national security – how we build a clean energy future and leverage our proud heritage matters.

    Today’s consultations, on both the critical role of the North Sea in the energy transition and how the taxation regime will respond to unusually high oil and gas prices, will help to begin to give certainty to investors and create a stable investment environment for years to come. We will continue to work with government and wider stakeholders to ensure a future North Sea which delivers economic growth and supports the communities that rely on this sector and workers across right and the UK.

    Rachel Solomon Williams, Executive Director, Aldersgate Group said:  

    The private sector recognises the growth opportunity of the clean energy transition alongside the risks associated with investments that are incompatible with the 1.5C target. This consultation is an important step on the path to building a prosperous and resilient economy, with wider benefits across all regions of the UK. Investing in assets that risk becoming stranded is sustainable for neither the UK economy nor the environment – the government’s recognition of this position will contribute to resolving uncertainty and building private sector confidence for clean energy investments in the region.    

    The skills and expertise built over recent decades in the North Sea are invaluable. They are highly transferable for clean energy and other growth sectors, both directly and with further upskilling. We welcome the government’s announcement that it is ensuring that the North Sea transition makes best use of the strengths in the region, creating opportunities and jobs. Capturing this growth opportunity for the UK must ensure that the local communities and workers can play a role in future energy sectors. The right policy framework and engagement with industry and local communities can enable a transition to net zero emissions without deindustrialisation.

    Dan McGrail, Chief Executive, RenewableUK said: 

    The biggest offshore wind farms in the world are being built in the North Sea and even more ambitious projects are being planned. Offshore wind is at the very heart of the government’s mission to reach clean power by 2030 and net zero by 2050, and the industry also offers the UK one of its biggest opportunities for job creation, industrial regeneration and economic growth. 

    The North Sea is already playing a crucial role in powering the UK and this is set to grow in the years ahead. A future focused on offshore wind isn’t just cleaner – it provides a more stable energy system for billpayers as we will be less exposed to volatile international fossil fuel prices. Offshore wind also offers opportunities for skilled workers from other industries to transfer into this dynamic and innovative sector.

    Notes to Editors 

    The Department for Energy Security and Net Zero’s consultation on Building the North Sea’s Energy Future will run for 8 weeks from 5 March to 30 April.

    The government is consulting on how to deliver its commitment to end new licences to explore new fields, including all new seaward exploration and production licences to search for and extract new oil and gas resources in the UK. Licence extensions and transfers would not be affected, to facilitate existing fields to operate for the entirety of their lifetime and support the government’s commitments not to revoke existing licences. Licences for carbon storage, gas storage and methane drainage would also not be affected.   

    The consultation also sets out the government’s commitment to end new licences for onshore oil and gas exploration and production in England.    

    HM Treasury’s consultation on High Price Mechanism for Oil and Gas will run for 12 weeks from 5 March to 28 May.   

    Officials figures from the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero’s ‘Digest of UK Energy Statistics’ show a 72% reduction in UK oil and gas production occurring between 1999 and 2023. The North Sea Transition Authority also predicts an 89 per cent drop in UK oil and gas production by 2050.   

    Office for National Statistics’ analysis shows that direct jobs in oil and gas extraction fell by around a third between 2014 and 2023.   

    Meanwhile, findings from the Robert Gordon University study ‘Powering up the Workforce’ in 2023 estimated that the offshore renewables workforce – which includes offshore wind, carbon capture and storage, and hydrogen – could increase to between 70,000 and 138,000 in 2030. This study also found that over 90% of the UK’s oil and gas workforce have medium to high skills transferability and are well positioned to work in adjacent energy sector.   

    Today’s announcement also comes after the government confirmed Aberdeen, Cheshire, Lincolnshire and Pembrokeshire as key growth regions for clean energy and launched pilots to help workers in these areas access jobs in new clean energy industries.    

    Oil and gas workers will also get help to move into these sectors, thanks to a new energy ‘skills passport’ launched last month – led by Renewable UK and Offshore Energies UK, and backed by UK and Scottish Governments. This tool will support workers into careers in offshore wind initially, before being expanded to other renewables roles later this year.   

    Many of the skills required for the transition already exist, with research showing that 90% of oil and gas workers have transferable skills for offshore renewable jobs. The government is now exploring what further support is needed to help workers take full advantage of the UK’s clean energy transition, as part of its consultation on the future of the North Sea.

    Updates to this page

    Published 5 March 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: IAEA Board of Governors on the JCPoA, March 2025: E3 statement

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Speech

    IAEA Board of Governors on the JCPoA, March 2025: E3 statement

    France, Germany and the UK (E3) gave a joint statement to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Board of Governors on Iran’s implementation of its nuclear commitments under the JCPoA

    Chair,

    On behalf of France, Germany and the United Kingdom, I thank Director General Grossi for his latest report on Iran’s nuclear programme.

    Once again, we commend the Agency’s professional, independent and impartial work and their objective reporting on Iran’s nuclear programme. Unfortunately, the Agency’s findings are gravely concerning. The IAEA’s latest report confirms that Iran continues to undertake activities in blatant violation of the JCPoA and that there has been no improvement in its cooperation with the IAEA. The extent of Iran’s enrichment activities is unprecedented for a state without nuclear weapons, and have no credible civilian justification. The IAEA is currently unable to verify that Iran’s escalating nuclear programme is exclusively peaceful. This taken together with the recent statements by high-ranking Iranian officials calling for a change in Iran’s so-called nuclear doctrine, poses a serious threat to international security, and the non-proliferation regime.

    Chair,

    In the reporting period Iran has further expanded its enriched uranium stockpile and enrichment capacity. Iran has increased its stockpile of high enriched uranium by an alarming 50% since the last reporting period. Iran now has six significant quantities of high enriched uranium, which the Agency defines as six times the approximate amount of nuclear material from which the possibility of manufacturing a nuclear explosive device cannot be excluded. Iran’s overall stockpile of enriched uranium is now approximately 40 times the limit Iran committed to in the JCPoA.

    Iran has increased the rate of production of high enriched uranium at the underground Fordow facility by seven times compared to the previous reporting period. And overall, Iran is now producing roughly one significant quantity of highly enriched uranium every six weeks. In addition, Iran has substantially expanded its enriched uranium production capacity by installing and operating new advanced centrifuges. In the reporting period, it has begun operating 5 new cascades in Fordow and 13 cascades in Natanz. It remains particularly concerning that enrichment continues to take place at Fordow, which we recall is a former undeclared enrichment facility.

    As a result of Iran’s continued non-cooperation and lack of transparency, the DG’s latest report restates that the Agency has lost and will not be able to restore continuity of knowledge in relation to the production and inventory of centrifuges, rotors and bellows, heavy water and uranium ore concentrate.

    Iran refuses to re-designate several experienced Agency inspectors. This is a politically motivated decision which seriously affects the IAEA’s ability to conduct its verification in Iran, particularly at its enrichment facilities. We deeply regret that Iran has not accepted the designation of the four additional experienced inspectors after pledging to consider it ahead of the November 2024 Board of Governors meeting.

    The DG’s report also notes that it has been four years since Iran stopped provisionally applying its Additional Protocol, depriving the Agency of complementary access to critical sites and locations in Iran. Alongside this we remain alarmed by Iran’s repeated threats to leave the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. This poses a serious threat to the non-proliferation system upon which we all rely.

    Chair,

    The E3 have consistently worked towards a diplomatic solution to address Iran’s nuclear programme. In 2022 it was Iran who twice refused a negotiated outcome and instead escalated and expanded its nuclear programme. Let us be clear: Iran has chosen to escalate its nuclear programme, far beyond the limits it committed to in the JCPoA and far beyond any credible civilian use, thereby causing a proliferation crisis.

    We therefore urgently call on Iran to change course, and:

    (i) Halt and reverse its nuclear escalation and refrain from making threats regarding nuclear weapons; (ii) Return to the limits imposed by the JCPoA, in particular those regarding enrichment levels and enriched uranium stockpiles; (iii) Implement the Iran-IAEA March 2023 Joint statement and the commitments it made regarding transparency and cooperation with the IAEA including re-applying all transparency measures that it stopped in February 2021; (iv) Allow the Agency to install surveillance and monitoring equipment where requested; (v) Re-implement and swiftly ratify the Additional Protocol; and (vi) Fully reverse its September 2023 decision to withdraw the designations of experienced inspectors.

    Chair,

    In light of the threat posed by Iran’s nuclear programme, there is an urgent need to address these concerns. The international community must remain united and firm in its determination to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons. The E3 will continue to work towards a diplomatic solution, and we stand ready to use all diplomatic levers to achieve this goal.

    We ask the Director General to keep the Board informed on all relevant activities and developments within Iran’s alarming nuclear programme by regular and, if deemed necessary, extraordinary reporting. We ask for this report to be made public.

    Thank you.

    Updates to this page

    Published 5 March 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Martyn Oliver’s speech at the Nursery World Business Summit

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Speech

    Martyn Oliver’s speech at the Nursery World Business Summit

    Sir Martyn Oliver, Ofsted’s Chief Inspector, spoke at the 2025 Nursery World Business Summit in London.

    Hello, thank you for the invitation to speak to you all today.

    Congratulations also to Nursery World on your hundred-year anniversary. That’s a fantastic achievement.

    I want to start by also thanking you for the wonderful work you do every day.

    We all know how important it is to make sure children get the best start in life.

    The early years are when the first building blocks are laid and when we set children on a lifelong journey of learning.

    So, thank you again.

    I’m looking forward to hearing from you and having a discussion with Catherine, but I just want to take a few minutes to tell you about the changes we’re proposing to how we work with you and other education providers.

    If you don’t already know, we’re consulting on a new approach on how we inspect and on how we report.

    Our aims

    We had several goals in mind as we developed these proposals.

    Firstly, and importantly, we want to keep the best of the current framework. The prominence of things like communication and language, what we want children to learn and, of course, how we keep them safe. They will all stay. I hope you agree that these elements have driven ever higher standards and a focus on what really matters in those precious early years.

    Secondly, we want to better inform parents and families. And so, we’re proposing a new report card that gives more detailed, more specific, and more nuanced information about the places educating their children, removing those simplistic overall effectiveness grades.

    Choosing a nursery is often the first educational choice families make.

    And it’s often the choice for which they have the most options to make a decision between.

    I believe our new report cards will do more to help them with this decision.

    And I believe they will do more to shine a light on the great things you’re doing and what makes your settings unique.

    Too often, what makes you remarkable was lost behind a few headline words.

    Soon, our proposals suggest that families will be able to see, in more detail, what’s special about you, what you do well and what you’re working on.

    Thirdly, we want to put inclusion at the heart of what we do. We’re proposing a new evaluation area looking very specifically at how you support the most vulnerable and disadvantaged children. And we’re threading it through every other evaluation area that we look at. Because, and I’ve always said this, I believe if you’re getting it right for the most disadvantaged and vulnerable, you’ll be getting it right for all your children.

    But alongside all of that, we want to make life easier and simpler for you.

    That’s why we’ve developed our new inspection toolkits for how we inspect. These set out the standards we expect, the standards that you all work to and in many cases beyond, across a range of evaluation areas.

    The evaluation areas themselves are, we believe, the core elements that go to make up great provision. And, fundamentally, these are rooted in the regulations and the statutory requirements that you already have to work to in the early years foundation stage – the EYFS. We’re not asking anything new of you, or anything you won’t already be doing.

    Tailoring our approach to you

    We heard in the Big Listen, last year, that you felt the current framework didn’t fully recognise the uniqueness of early years.

    So, the first thing to say is that these toolkits are bespoke to the different types and stages of education. Rather than a one-size-fits-all framework, there’s a toolkit specifically for you, for the early years sector. For nurseries like you and anyone else educating the youngest children.

    We’ll then go even further. And we’ll tailor our approach to how you work. We will train our inspectors on how to apply the toolkit in each type of provision – and share this information with you. And we’ll shape our inspection activities to the age and stage of development of the children in your care, and the context in which you’re working. That’s so crucial.

    So, for example, your inspection will look different to one at a childminder. This all means we can match our approach to what’s really important to your children and to their families.

    And we can take proper consideration of the challenges and the context that you are facing.

    Using existing standards

    As I’ve mentioned, we have also built the standards in all of our toolkits on the existing requirements for each sector. So, in your case, as I’ve just said, they are based around the requirements set out in the EYFS with the statutory and the regulatory standards at the core.

    We want you to be working for your children, not doing things ‘for Ofsted’.

    Nothing that we’re looking at should come as a surprise.

    We want to see things like:

    • safe and supportive environments
    • well-designed and delivered curricula
    • support and professional development for your staff
    • children developing across all the areas of learning
    • and a thoughtful combination of explicit teaching, planned and purposeful play, yes, purposeful play, and lots of positive interactions between you and your children

    How we recognise that you’re doing these things is also changing. We heard from parents in the Big Listen that a single word summary grade didn’t provide that nuance and a complex picture of a provider that they wanted.

    So, we will provide one of 5 grades for a range of evaluation areas. There will be ‘causing concern’ and ‘attention needed’ grades for an area where something isn’t quite good enough, and needs some focus to improve.

    But, if you’re meeting the government’s EYFS requirements for the learning, development and care of your children, you will also be meeting the standards for a ‘secure’ grade. And if you are going beyond these standards then you will be working at a ‘strong’ level. Perhaps, you may even have an element of your work that is at our new highest ‘exemplary’ standard.

    Your funding

    We know that your funding can often be dependent on our grades. So, let me also take this opportunity to reassure you that we are working with the department for education to maintain the continuity in this funding as our approach and our grades change.

    And if for any reason we do find something that needs attention, we will return more quickly than ever to check on the improvements you’re making. And that way, you won’t have long periods with an inspection outcome that no longer reflects your provision.

    Helping you grow

    But if you’re doing well, and you want to grow your business, we want to make sure you’re able to do just that. We want to help the best providers to get more settings registered more quickly. To offer care and education to more children.

    But to do this, I know you need to be able to recruit good staff too. And I know that’s really difficult for many of you right now.

    We want to make sure more people can enter the sector. We want you to have access to the workforce you need and young children need to have the consistent relationships with fantastic practitioners like you that they deserve.

    But I do need to be clear. The answer isn’t lower standards.

    Having appropriately qualified staff is important, and Ofsted does have concerns about the government’s new experience-based route. We will work with them to make sure any new routes into the profession continue to meet the high standards that we all want in this room for children.

    Next steps

    So that’s a quick run through of our proposals, and some of our other current priorities.

    I’m happy to answer questions on any and all of that, or anything else you want to ask about.

    I’m also delighted that Wendy Ratcliff, our Principal Officer for Early Years Education, is going to join me for the discussion. If you’ve got any really tricky questions, watch how nimbly I pass them over to Wendy. You’ve got me stumped!

    What’s more, if we run out of time, Wendy and her colleagues will be running a drop-in zone in the lunch breakout area after the session. So, you can go and ask them anything we don’t get to in this session.

    But before all of that, I just want to finish with a plea.

    A plea for you all to take part in our consultation. You can find it on our website, and you have until 28th April to participate.

    I’m really proud of the proposals we’re making. I think they will be better for you, better for parents, and most importantly, better for children.

    But I’m sure they can still be improved. And I’m sure that we need your help for that.

    You’re out there every day, making a difference in children’s lives. So please bring that wealth of experience that exists in this room, to bear and help us make the best possible system we can.

    Perhaps something is unclear or ambiguous? Perhaps we can do more to recognise the nuances of different types of provision or your unique context and challenges? Or perhaps we need to aim even higher and expect more to make sure all children get that crucial best start in life?

    Whatever it is, please don’t miss this opportunity to tell us. You can make a real difference, and we need your help.

    So thank you, and let’s get to some questions.

    Updates to this page

    Published 5 March 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: E3 Foreign Ministers’ statement on humanitarian access in Gaza

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments 3

    Press release

    E3 Foreign Ministers’ statement on humanitarian access in Gaza

    Statement from the Foreign Ministers of the UK, France and Germany on humanitarian access in Gaza

    Joint Statement on behalf of the Foreign Ministers of France, Germany and the UK (E3)

    We, the Foreign Ministers of France, Germany and the United Kingdom recall our continued support for the ceasefire between Israel and Hamas.

    It is vital that the ceasefire is sustained, all the hostages are released, and continued flows of humanitarian aid to Gaza are ensured. We urge all parties to engage constructively in negotiating the subsequent phases of the deal to help ensure its full implementation and a permanent end to hostilities. We welcome Egyptian, Qatari and US efforts in mediating and seeking to agree an extension to the ceasefire.

    The humanitarian situation in Gaza is catastrophic. We express our deep concern at the Government of Israel’s announcement on 2 March to halt all entry of goods and supplies into Gaza. We call on the Government of Israel to abide by its international obligations to ensure full, rapid, safe and unhindered provision of humanitarian assistance to the population in Gaza.  This includes supply of items such as medical equipment, shelter items, and water and sanitation equipment, essential to meet humanitarian and early recovery needs in Gaza, but which face restrictions under Israel’s “dual use” list. A halt on goods and supplies entering Gaza, such as that announced by the Government of Israel would risk violating International Humanitarian Law. Humanitarian aid should never be contingent on a ceasefire or used as a political tool. We reiterate that the civilians of Gaza who have suffered so much must be allowed to return to their homes and rebuild their lives.

    All hostages must be unconditionally released and Hamas must end their degrading and humiliating treatment. We reiterate our unwavering solidarity with their families and with the Israeli people in the face of the terrorist attacks committed by Hamas on 7 October 2023.

    We need all parties to uphold the ceasefire and ensure it leads to a sustainable peace, the reconstruction of Gaza, and to allow for a credible pathway towards a two-state solution in which Israelis and Palestinians can live side by side in peace.

    Updates to this page

    Published 5 March 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom