NewzIntel.com

Category: Finance

  • MIL-OSI Security: Florida Man Sentenced to Federal Prison for Aggravated Identity Theft and Wire Fraud

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

                Montgomery, Ala. – Today, Acting United States Attorney Kevin Davidson announced the sentencing of a Palm Bay, Florida man to 70 months in prison for using a fake identity to purchase a vehicle. On October 21, 2024, a federal judge sentenced 39-year-old Anthony Vila to 70 months in prison. In addition to the prison sentence, the judge also ordered that Vila serve three years of supervised release following his prison term. There is no parole in the federal system.

               According to his plea agreement and other court records, in early August of 2022, Vila contacted a salesman at a Prattville, Alabama car dealership via electronic communications regarding the purchase of a vehicle valued at $45,000. After being denied financing, Vila sent the personal identifying information of someone he claimed to be his aunt to be used by the dealership as a co-signor on the loan. The information included a copy of the co-signor’s driver’s license and a pay stub. However, both documents were counterfeit. Vila also provided a date of birth and social security number for his alleged co-signor and had an unknown female claiming to be his aunt speak to the dealership over the phone. The $45,000 loan was eventually approved. The individual that Vila falsely claimed to be his aunt had no knowledge of the transaction and had not given permission for her personal information to be used.

                On August 4, 2022, Vila picked up the vehicle from the dealership. Vila was apprehended with the vehicle a few days later in Montgomery. During a search of the vehicle, investigators found a laptop, printer, holograms, phone, firearm, and other items commonly used to commit identity theft. The phone contained over 100 stolen identities. The laptop contained evidence of the vehicle purchase described above. Vila pleaded guilty to wire fraud and aggravated identity theft on June 7, 2024. 

                The Federal Bureau of Investigation and Montgomery Police Department investigated this case. Assistant United States Attorney J. Patrick Lamb prosecuted the case. 

    MIL Security OSI –

  • MIL-OSI Banking: Charting the course: prudential regulation and supervision for smooth sailing

    Source: Bank for International Settlements

    Introduction

    Good afternoon, and thank you for inviting me to speak at this conference today.

    It is a privilege to be speaking today as the Chair of the Basel Committee, following my appointment by the Group of Governors and Heads of Supervision (GHOS) in May of this year.1 This is a position that has been previously enjoyed by only 11 people during the Committee’s 50 years. As a Reserve Officer in the Royal Swedish Navy, I would liken this honour as akin to taking the helm of a well steered vessel by seasoned captains. 

    As you know, the work of the Basel Committee since the Great Financial Crisis (GFC) – under the leadership of Nout Wellink, Stefan Ingves and, more recently, Pablo Hernández de Cos – has fundamentally reshaped the regulatory landscape for internationally active banks. The Basel Framework is the cornerstone of the international community’s response to the GFC. Since 2011, banks’ Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) risk-based capital ratio has increased by over 70% and now stands at around 13.8%.2 Global banking system leverage has almost halved during this period, with an average Tier 1 leverage ratio of just over 6%.3 And banks’ holdings of high-quality liquid assets have more than doubled to over €12.5 trillion, with a corresponding Liquidity Coverage Ratio of over 135%.4

    The Basel III reforms have brought tangible benefits. In sailing, no matter how skilled you are, you can’t control the weather. However, you can prepare your boat with safety protocols and solid equipment. The Committee helps ensure that the global banking system is prepared for the unexpected. There is now an extensive empirical literature that suggests that the Basel III reforms have had an unambiguously positive net macroeconomic effect.5 The reforms have clearly strengthened bank resilience at both the bank and system-wide level, which in turn will help reduce the likelihood and impact of future banking crises. At the same time, banks, particularly strongly capitalised ones, have continued to meet the demand for lending from households and businesses.6

    Just as important as the effects of Basel III is the process by which the reforms were finalised. The Committee consulted extensively when developing Basel III – we do not operate in a vacuum or opaquely. It published no fewer than 10 consultation papers, which collectively spanned a consultation period of almost three years. It engaged extensively with a wide range of external stakeholders. Each consultation was accompanied by a rigorous quantitative impact study, which was supplemented by a half-yearly public Basel III monitoring exercise. So it is reassuring and appropriate to find that a recent academic study concluded that the Committee’s consultation approach is “one of the most procedurally sophisticated” processes among policymaking bodies.7 Moreover, member jurisdictions have undertaken their own rigorous domestic rule-making processes to transpose these standards.

    But the work to fix the banking system fault lines exposed by the GFC is not done. We need to lock in the financial stability benefits of implementing the outstanding Basel III standards in full and consistently, and as soon as possible. I take comfort in the recent unanimous reaffirmation by the GHOS to achieve such an outcome.8 The Committee has been actively monitoring and assessing the full and consistent implementation of Basel III and will continue to do so.

    As this is my maiden speech as Committee Chair, I will outline some high-level principles that I will be relying upon to help guide how I view the work of the Committee. I will also offer a few personal reflections on some topical issues. As a keen sailor, I should apologise in advance for my continued use of maritime language!

    Principle 1: Sail forward but always glance back

    My starting point is that we cannot afford to ignore, or forget, the lessons of history. This time is not different. There have been no fewer than 150 systemic banking crises since 1970.9 Just last year, we saw the most significant system-wide banking stress since the GFC, including the distress of five banks with total assets exceeding one trillion US dollars. While each banking crisis may have had its unique characteristics, the common thread throughout history is that we simply cannot predict when or from where the next crisis will emerge. We therefore need to ensure robust and durable resilience for the global banking system to withstand a range of potential shocks.    

    Banking crises have a profound impact on our economies and social welfare. In my home country of Sweden, the 1990s banking crisis and the GFC resulted in output losses of over 30% and 25%, respectively.10 These are not just numbers, but reflect economic hardships endured by citizens, including job losses and foregone growth potential. We must always remember this stark reality when regulating and supervising banks.

    And yet, despite the painful effects of banking crises, history suggests that the lessons from such events are often forgotten as part of a “regulatory cycle”.11 Memories fade over time, and a view takes hold that this time really is different. As the cycle turns, policymakers, supervisors and risk managers at banks sometimes become complacent and give in to pressures to dilute regulatory safeguards. Such a journey never ends well: it is only a matter of time until stormy waters reveal banks’ stress points and fractures.

    This is not a course that I intend to chart. The reality is that a banking system built upon leverage and maturity transformation will inevitably face episodes of distress. Misconduct, governance failures and imprudent risk management practices further increase the likelihood and impact of crises.

    To be clear, the first and most important source of resilience comes from banks’ own risk management practices and governance arrangements. The boards and management of banks should be the first port of call in managing and overseeing risks; they cannot outsource these functions to supervisors. Yet history suggests that some banks’ boards and senior management occasionally fail in their most elementary responsibilities. So it is critical that bankers, policymakers and supervisors do not forget the lessons from the past and take a medium-term perspective. Consider, for example, the recent growth in the use of so-called synthetic risk transfers (SRTs) by banks across several regions.12 Such transactions are intended to reduce banks’ capital requirements by “transferring” the risks associated with some exposures to a third party – often a non-bank financial intermediary (NBFI) – which provides credit protection or insurance. The Basel Framework allows for such transactions to take place subject to meeting certain criteria, and they may in instances be an effective risk management technique. However, I personally believe that we should not lose sight of the bigger picture and lessons from the GFC. In particular, we should ask ourselves: are there system-wide risks that warrant closer attention? For example, what are the risks if NBFI investors of SRTs are in turn borrowing from other banks? Is there sufficient transparency about the interconnections and potential spillover of risks between banks and NBFIs in these – and other – markets? A natural starting point to help answer these questions is to remind ourselves of the lessons from the GFC. 

    Just like a sailor needs steady winds, strong sails and safety gear for times of stress to ensure a smooth voyage, a bank requires strong prudential regulation and supervision to ensure stability. And its board and senior management should display the leadership and competency of a veteran captain. In addition, it is critical that the Committee remains vigilant and pursues a forward-looking approach to assessing risks and vulnerabilities to help reduce the risk of the global banking system being blown off course into financial storms.

    The Committee’s work should also continue to be anchored by rigorous empirical analysis and not succumb to short-term or specific interests of some external stakeholders. And the GHOS agreed to mark a clear end to the Basel III policy agenda in 2020 when it noted that any further potential adjustments to Basel III “will be limited in nature and consistent with the Committee’s evaluation work”.13 This is why the Committee is pursuing analytical work based on empirical evidence to assess whether specific features of the Basel Framework performed as intended during the 2023 banking turmoil, such as liquidity risk and interest rate risk in the banking book.14 On this note, we recently provided a progress report to the G20 which outlines the progress we have made in the area of liquidity risk.15 This is a good start, but there is still more work to be done. Structural changes affecting the financial system, such as the ongoing digitalisation of finance and role of social media, require policymakers and supervisors to remain alert and be open-minded as to whether any additional regulatory and supervisory measures are needed.

    Principle 2: All hands on deck

    My second guiding principle is the need for global and transparent engagement with a wide range of stakeholders.

    Financial stability is a global public good that requires cross-border cooperation. An open global financial system requires global prudential standards. Failure on this count could result in regulatory fragmentation, regulatory arbitrage and a potential “race to the bottom” leading to a dilution of banks’ resilience.16

    So I will strive to build on the strong track record of Committee members to cooperate and collaborate in tackling cross-border financial stability challenges and shoring up the resilience of the global banking system. We have witnessed the benefits of global cooperation throughout the Committee’s history, including with the Concordat, Basel I, II and III, and the Basel Core Principles, and of course more recently during the Covid-19 period and last year’s banking turmoil. And in a world facing major geopolitical uncertainty, and where the merits of multilateralism are sometimes questioned, it is even more critical for the Committee to remind all stakeholders of the necessity of cross-border cooperation.

    The need for cooperation is not just among Committee members themselves. Given the increasingly cross-sectoral and cross-cutting nature of developments affecting the global financial system – such as the ongoing digitalisation of finance, the growing role of NBFIs, the increasing nodes of interconnections among banks, central counterparties and NBFIs, or climate-related financial risks – the Committee will need to increasingly liaise with a wide range of authorities. This includes ongoing cooperation with central banks and supervisory authorities outside the Basel Committee’s membership, but also financial sector authorities in charge of overseeing conduct, resolution, deposit insurance, payment systems, securities and other NBFIs. In fact, for certain topics there may also be a need to go beyond the financial sector sphere and liaise with authorities with responsibility for accounting, competition, data privacy and security, just to mention a few.

    To this end, it is critical that the Committee continues to seek the views of a wide range of stakeholders, including academics, civil society, legislators, market participants and the general public. Even if we may have different views on specific elements of the Committee’s work, these engagements unquestionably enhance the Committee’s outputs by bringing in different perspectives.

    Principle 3: Keep your heading steady

    My third principle is the importance for the Committee to act as a lighthouse, cutting through the fog and stormy conditions.

    Bank regulation and financial supervision are an anchor to help prevent banks from drifting into risky waters that could endanger the entire economy. A resilient and healthy banking system is one that can best support households and businesses through the robust provision of key financial services across the financial cycle.17

    Let me give you an example from my home country. Before the pandemic, the initial set of Basel III standards were fully implemented in Sweden. These reforms significantly increased Swedish banks’ resilience to shocks. In addition, the Swedish authorities activated the Basel III countercyclical buffer and set it at 2.5%, with the aim to further enhance Swedish banks’ resilience. Doing so allowed us to release this buffer in response to the Covid-19 crisis, which in turn helped Swedish banks to absorb shocks and to lend to creditworthy households and companies throughout the pandemic. The releasability of this buffer facilitated its drawdown by banks in a way that made it genuinely usable.

    It may be tempting for some to argue that regulations should be watered down and that supervision should be less intrusive, in order to promote lending to specific sectors or to “unlock” economic growth. But, as with other areas of economic policymaking, any perceived short-term gains are usually more than offset by longer-term pain. Shaving off a few basis points of capital will not unlock a wave of new lending, but it will weaken your resilience. More generally, being well capitalised is a competitive advantage for banks and their shareholders, as it ensures that they can continue to grow and invest in profitable projects across the financial cycle. The Committee’s work should therefore continue to be centred around its mandate.

    To be clear, this is entirely compatible with stable and healthy earnings that are fundamental to banking and financial stability. So it is reassuring that the sample of banks for which we regularly collect data – many of which are represented here today – have over time been able to both meet new regulatory requirements, make healthy profits and pay out significant dividends. For example, in 2011 banks faced a CET1 capital shortfall from Basel III of about €485 billion. Since then, their profits have exceeded €4 trillion and banks have paid out over €1.3 trillion of common share dividends, while at the same time building capital and liquidity buffers to meet the new requirements.18

    More generally, the Committee will continue to focus its work on those prudential areas that require a global and coordinated response. Its outputs will continue to take the form of global minimum standards to provide a common financial stability baseline across jurisdictions. Jurisdictions are, of course, free to go beyond this baseline if the size and structure of their banking system and the associated risks warrant additional measures. Such measures only reinforce global financial stability. Just as importantly, we will continue to promote strong supervision, including by sharing supervisory experiences and, when needed, developing additional guidance to assist supervisors worldwide.

    In that regard, I am sure all of us can agree that it is in our collective best interest to have global standards. We may have different opinions about Basel III, but I think we can all agree that having a globally consistent level playing field is preferable to a patchwork of disparate regulations. A global compromise – however imperfect it may appear to some – is preferable to a free-for-all framework. Internationally active banks then have a common minimum regulatory baseline which they can manage their business around. Supervisors are able to better assess the relative resilience of their banks across jurisdictions. The scope for regulatory arbitrage is reduced. Level playing fields are enhanced. Now compare this with a fragmented bank regulatory world, where banks would have to comply with completely different rules across borders with no common minimum baseline. Such a scenario could also trigger a race to the bottom across jurisdictions, resulting in a frail regulatory framework that would threaten global financial stability and banks’ own viability. We would all be worse off in such a situation. It is therefore in your own interest to avoid such a scenario and to promote a common and consistent implementation of Basel III.

    Finally, we should keep the fundamentals of bank regulation and supervision in mind. While it may be tempting to focus on the “newest” trends affecting the banking system, we should not lose sight of the more traditional risks, such as credit risk and liquidity risk. Regarding the former, despite repeated headwinds over the past few years, the feared wave of financial problems for households and corporate defaults has yet to appear. Yet I am personally concerned about some stakeholders’ seeming complacency in assuming that the worst is over and that the seas are calm. It is a universal truth that a calm sea does not make a clever sailor.

    With continued uncertainty about interest rate trajectories and the economic outlook, hidden currents and unseen reefs could still pose a challenge. Banks and supervisors must remain vigilant to such risks.

    Principle 4: Sailing to simplicity

    My last principle is to ensure that the Committee continues to adequately balance risk sensitivity with simplicity and comparability. Finance and banking are complex activities, so there is perhaps an understandable temptation to match that complexity in the regulatory framework.

    Yet one does not always fight fire with fire. Undue complexity in prudential regulation can undermine the ability for a bank’s board and senior management to fully understand the risk profile of their bank. It can also impede supervisors’ ability to effectively assess the resilience of banks and create opaque opportunities for arbitrage. And while complex rules may sound conceptually appealing, they may also prove to be challenging to operationalise in practice.

    Banking is as much about risk as it is about uncertainty.19 In such a world, simpler approaches can sometimes be more robust and outperform more complex ones.20 So I personally think that policymaking initiatives should ensure that sufficient attention is placed at striking the right balance between risk sensitivity, simplicity and comparability.

    Conclusion

    In conclusion, the Committee will continue to be guided by its mandate of strengthening the regulation, supervision and practices of banks worldwide. In the near term, when it comes to Basel III, all GHOS members have unanimously reaffirmed their expectation of implementing all aspects of the framework in full, consistently and as soon as possible.21

    More generally, fulfilling our mandate requires us all to remember that:

    • Banks’ boards and senior management are the captains of their ships. You have both the primary and ultimate responsibility for overseeing and managing risks. Regulation and supervision can provide safeguards, but cannot and should not be a substitute for your role in managing your risks prudently.
    • Global bank prudential standards are a public good. We are collectively all better off in a world with global standards than in an autarkic one. Lobbying for deviations at a national level can perhaps provide short-term (private) gains but will ultimately threaten global financial stability. As internationally active banks, it is not in your interest to sail in such an environment.
    • We cannot forget the lessons from past banking crises to prepare effectively for the future. In a financial system undergoing profound structural transformations, such as the digitalisation of finance, the Committee should keep an open mind as to whether additional adjustments to the Basel Framework are warranted over the medium term. And we will focus on global financial stability issues that require a global response.

    As Chair, I am fully committed to leading the Committee in that direction.

    References

    Aikman, D, M Glaesic, G Gigerenzer, S Kapadia, K Kastikopoulos, A Kothiyal, E Murphy and T Neumann (2021): “Taking uncertainty seriously: simplicity versus complexity in financial regulation”, Industrial and Corporate Change, vol 30, no 2, April.

    Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) (2020): “Governors and Heads of Supervision commit to ongoing coordinated approach to mitigate Covid-19 risks to the global banking system and endorse future direction of Basel Committee work”, press release, 30 November.

    — (2022a): Evaluation of the impact and efficacy of the Basel III reforms, December.

    — (2022b): Evaluation of the impact and efficacy of the Basel III reforms – Annex, December.

    — (2023): Report on the 2023 banking turmoil, October.

    — (2024a): “Erik Thedéen appointed as Chair of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision”, press release, 13 May.

    — (2024b): “Governors and Heads of Supervision reiterate commitment to Basel III implementation and provide update on cryptoasset standard”, press release, 13 May.

    — (2024c): “BCBS dashboards”, September.

    — (2024d): The 2023 banking turmoil and liquidity risk: a progress report, October.

    Carstens, A (2019): “The role of regulation, implementation and research in promoting financial stability”, keynote address at the Bank of Spain and CEMFI Second Conference on Financial Stability, Madrid, 3 June.

    Hernández de Cos, P (2019): “The future path of the Basel Committee: some guiding principles”, keynote speech at the Institute for International Finance Annual Membership Meeting, Washington DC, 17 October.

    — (2022): “A resilient transition to net zero”, remarks at the International Economic Forum of the Americas, 28th edition of the Conference of Montreal, 11 July.

    — (2024): “Building on 50 years of global cooperation”, keynote speech at the 23rd International Conference of Banking Supervisors, Basel, 24 April.

    Knight, F (1921): Risk, uncertainty and profit, Houghton Mifflin.

    Laeven, L and F Valencia (2018): “Systemic banking crises revisited”, IMF Working Paper, no 18/206.

    S&P Global (2024): “Banks ramp up credit risk transfers to optimise regulatory capital”, 22 February.

    Viterbo, A (2019): “The European Union in the transnational financial regulatory arena: the case of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision”, Journal of International Economic Law, vol 1, no 24, June.

    This speech and the views expressed are those of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and/or position of the BIS or CPMI.

    MIL OSI Global Banks –

  • MIL-OSI: ChampionX Reports Third Quarter 2024 Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    • Revenue of $906.5 million
    • Net income attributable to ChampionX of $72.0 million
    • Adjusted net income of $85.9 million
    • Adjusted EBITDA of $197.5 million
    • Income before income taxes margin of 11.2%
    • Adjusted EBITDA margin of 21.8%
    • Cash from operating activities of $141.3 million and free cash flow of $108.1 million

    THE WOODLANDS, Texas, Oct. 23, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — ChampionX Corporation (NASDAQ: CHX) (“ChampionX” or the “Company”) today announced third quarter of 2024 results. Revenue was $906.5 million, net income attributable to ChampionX was $72.0 million, and adjusted EBITDA was $197.5 million. Income before income taxes margin was 11.2% and adjusted EBITDA margin was 21.8%. Cash from operating activities was $141.3 million and free cash flow was $108.1 million.

    CEO Commentary

    “The third quarter demonstrated the resiliency of our ChampionX portfolio as we delivered strong adjusted EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA margin, and generated robust free cash flow. These results were the direct result of our employees around the world remaining laser-focused on serving our customers well, and I am grateful to them for their dedication to our corporate purpose of improving lives,” ChampionX’s President and Chief Executive Officer Sivasankaran “Soma” Somasundaram said.

    “During the third quarter of 2024, we generated revenue of $907 million, which decreased 4% year-over-year, as growth in North America, Middle East & Africa, Europe, and Asia Pacific was offset by Latin America, which was impacted by lower sales in Mexico. Revenue from all areas other than Mexico increased 6% year-over-year. Our revenue increased 1% sequentially, with both North America and international revenues increasing slightly versus the second quarter. North America revenues were up 2% sequentially, driven primarily by higher sales volumes in our artificial lift business. International revenues were up 1% sequentially, driven, in part, by the contribution of RMSpumptools, which was acquired during the quarter. We generated net income attributable to ChampionX of $72 million, income before income taxes margin of 11.2%, and we delivered adjusted EBITDA of $198 million, representing a 21.8% adjusted EBITDA margin, our highest level as ChampionX, which speaks to the productivity and profitability focus of our team.

    “Cash flow from operating activities was $141 million during the third quarter, which represented 196% of net income attributable to ChampionX, and we generated strong free cash flow of $108 million, which represented 55% of our adjusted EBITDA for the period. We remain confident in achieving at least 50% adjusted EBITDA to free cash flow conversion for 2024. Our balance sheet and financial position remain strong, ending the third quarter with approximately $1.1 billion of liquidity, including $389 million of cash and $671 million of available capacity on our revolving credit facility.”

    Agreement to be Acquired by SLB

    On April 2, 2024, SLB (NYSE: SLB) and ChampionX jointly announced a definitive Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) for SLB to purchase ChampionX in an all-stock transaction. The transaction was unanimously approved by the ChampionX board of directors and the transaction received the approval of the ChampionX stockholders at a special meeting held on June 18, 2024. The transaction is subject to regulatory approvals and other customary closing conditions. It is currently anticipated that the closing of the transaction will occur in the first quarter of 2025.

    ChampionX may continue to pay its regular quarterly cash dividends with customary record and payment dates, subject to certain limitations under the Merger Agreement. Given the pending acquisition of ChampionX by SLB, ChampionX has discontinued providing quarterly guidance and will not host a conference call or webcast to discuss its third quarter 2024 results.

    Production Chemical Technologies

    Production Chemical Technologies revenue in the third quarter of 2024 was $559.5 million, a decrease of $10.0 million, or 2%, sequentially, due primarily to lower international sales volumes.

    Segment operating profit was $87.3 million and adjusted segment EBITDA was $120.6 million. Segment operating profit margin was 15.6%, an increase of 60 basis points, sequentially, and adjusted segment EBITDA margin was 21.6%, an increase of 94 basis points, sequentially. The sequential increase in segment operating profit margin and adjusted segment EBITDA margin was driven by strong cost management, productivity improvements, and favorable product mix.

    Production & Automation Technologies

    Production & Automation Technologies revenue in the third quarter of 2024 was $275.7 million, an increase of $31.2 million, or 13%, sequentially, due primarily to higher artificial lift systems demand in North America, and the acquisition of RMSpumptools, which was completed during the quarter. Revenue from digital products was $57.9 million in the third quarter of 2024, an increase of 7% sequentially, driven by increased customer activity in North America.

    Segment operating profit was $34.1 million and adjusted segment EBITDA was $69.6 million. Segment operating profit margin was 12.4%, an increase of 330 basis points, sequentially, and adjusted segment EBITDA margin was 25.2%, an increase of 118 basis points, sequentially. The increase in segment operating profit margin and adjusted segment EBITDA margin was driven by higher sales volumes, productivity improvements, and favorable product mix.

    Drilling Technologies

    Drilling Technologies revenue in the third quarter of 2024 was $51.8 million, a decrease of $1.1 million, or 2%, sequentially, driven by lower sales volumes in the bearings product line associated with customers managing inventory levels.

    Segment operating profit was $11.5 million and adjusted segment EBITDA was $12.9 million. Segment operating profit margin was 22.2%, compared to 22.4% in the prior quarter, and adjusted segment EBITDA margin was 24.8%, a decrease of 2 basis points, sequentially, due primarily to lower volumes.

    Reservoir Chemical Technologies

    Reservoir Chemical Technologies revenue in the third quarter 2024 was $20.5 million, a decrease of $6.6 million, or 24%, sequentially, driven by lower sales volumes in the U.S. and internationally.

    Segment operating profit was $1.7 million and adjusted segment EBITDA was $3.3 million. Segment operating profit margin was 8.2%, a decrease of 793 basis points, sequentially, and adjusted segment EBITDA margin was 16.0%, a decrease of 592 basis points, sequentially. The decrease in segment operating profit margin and adjusted segment EBITDA margin was driven by lower volumes.

    Other Business Highlights

    • ChampionX won the Gulf Energy Information Excellence Award for best coating / corrosion advancement technology for its AnX coiled rod product line. The company was a finalist in four additional categories: SMARTEN™ XE ESP control system in the best controls, instrumentation, automation technology category; Pump Checker™ gas lift analysis module in the best digital transformation – upstream category; Chemical Technologies Decarbonization Program in the best HSE contribution category; and the ChampionX Diversity, Equality, and Inclusion programs in the DE&I in energy category.

    Other Business Highlights: Production Chemical Technologies and Reservoir Chemical Technologies

    • In the Asia Pacific region, ChampionX secured a significant new contract to provide both engineering services and the initial chemical supply for a new Floating Production Storage and Offloading (FPSO) unit, set to be deployed at a large gas condensate field in Australasia. Operations are scheduled to begin in the first half of 2025 and contribute significantly to regional Liquified Natural Gas (LNG) production capacity. This strategic win further strengthens our presence in the region and reinforces our commitment to delivering innovative, high-quality solutions to our upstream customers.
    • ChampionX was awarded a large first-fill contract to supply multiple production chemicals for corrosion inhibitors, scale inhibitors, and biocides for a major onshore oil and gas incremental project in Saudi Arabia.
    • ChampionX has secured a first-fill contract to supply production chemicals for a significant gas development program in Qatar.
    • ChampionX secured a multi-million-dollar order for a novel application of UltraFab in Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS) for delivery in 2025.
    • ChampionX recently completed the pre-commission cleaning, chemical treatment, and readiness work for the 303-mile natural gas Mountain Valley Pipeline connecting Marcellus and Utica shale production to markets in the Mid- and South-Atlantic regions.
    • In the Canadian oil sands, ChampionX completed a steam additive first-fill program for a major technology development trial, leading to additional market interest.
    • ChampionX was awarded a three-year contract extension from a major producer in the San Juan Basin in California, recognizing our service, people, and commitment to helping the producer achieve their strategic goals as reasons for the extension.
    • As part of an initiative to expand our technology into adjacent markets, ChampionX Reservoir Chemical Technologies was awarded business with a premier supplier of local sand used for hydraulic fracturing in the Permian Basin. Our solution affords the supplier a significant savings on sand drying costs and is designed to increase operational throughput.

    Other Business Highlights: Production & Automation Technologies

    • In the third quarter, ChampionX completed the acquisition of RMSpumptools, a provider of advanced mechanical and electrical solutions for complex ESP systems. The acquisition expands ChampionX’s international footprint while providing greater opportunities for RMSpumptools in North America. Soon after the acquisition close, our Permian ESP team collaborated with RMSpumptools to deliver a sand control solution to a major oil company operating in the Permian basin.
    • ChampionX Artificial Lift expanded its Latin America footprint into Ecuador with a contract award for two 400HP multiplex surface pump systems for jet lift applications. This accomplishment is the result of a strengthening partnership with a Latin America independent operator that is expanding its operations from Colombia to Ecuador. Unlike typical systems, the surface pump and oil vessel required for jet lifted wells will be built on one skid with all the necessary piping, which reduces assembly time at the wellsite.
    • Building on the combined strengths of our XSPOC artificial lift software and the acquisition of Artificial Lift Performance Limited Pump Checker software, ChampionX introduced ALLY™ production optimization digital solutions, debuting a modern interface with user-friendly dashboards and intuitive workflows, paired with powerful performance—ingesting, processing, and displaying more data than ever before. It is a one-stop-shop for production teams to manage and optimize their producing assets, regardless of lift type or equipment provider. Building on the launch of this new digital solution, in the third quarter ChampionX secured seven new clients for our production optimization software solution.
    • ChampionX launched the PCS Ferguson new generation SMARTEN™ Unify control system, which is engineered to deliver sophisticated digital automation and optimization capabilities at a cost of ownership that fits within the narrow economic profile of plunger lifted wells. SMARTEN Unify provides enhanced visibility to what is happening “live” at any second in a plunger lift system, eliminating the need for operating based on calculated guesses.

    Other Business Highlights: Drilling Technologies

    • Drilling Technologies’ diamond bearings products continue to see positive test results in additional downhole drilling and completion tools applications.
    • Drilling Technologies’ diamond inserts business had significant new products launches with four major customers.

    About Non-GAAP Measures

    In addition to financial results determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”), this news release presents non-GAAP financial measures. Management believes that adjusted EBITDA, adjusted EBITDA margin, adjusted net income attributable to ChampionX and adjusted diluted earnings per share attributable to ChampionX, provide useful information to investors regarding the Company’s financial condition and results of operations because they reflect the core operating results of our businesses and help facilitate comparisons of operating performance across periods. In addition, free cash flow, free cash flow to adjusted EBITDA ratio, and free cash flow to revenue ratio are used by management to measure our ability to generate positive cash flow for debt reduction and to support our strategic objectives. Although management believes the aforementioned non-GAAP financial measures are good tools for internal use and the investment community in evaluating ChampionX’s overall financial performance, the foregoing non-GAAP financial measures should be considered in addition to, not as a substitute for or superior to, other measures of financial performance prepared in accordance with GAAP. A reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures is included in the accompanying financial tables.

    About ChampionX

    ChampionX is a global leader in chemistry solutions, artificial lift systems, and highly engineered equipment and technologies that help companies drill for and produce oil and gas safely, efficiently, and sustainably around the world. ChampionX’s expertise, innovative products, and digital technologies provide enhanced oil and gas production, transportation, and real-time emissions monitoring throughout the lifecycle of a well. To learn more about ChampionX, visit our website at www.ChampionX.com. 

    Forward-Looking Statements

    This news release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Such forward-looking statements include statements relating to the proposed transaction between SLB and ChampionX, including statements regarding the benefits of the transaction and the anticipated timing of the transaction, and information regarding the businesses of SLB and ChampionX, including expectations regarding outlook and all underlying assumptions, SLB’s and ChampionX’s objectives, plans and strategies, information relating to operating trends in markets where SLB and ChampionX operate, statements that contain projections of results of operations or of financial condition and all other statements other than statements of historical fact that address activities, events or developments that SLB or ChampionX intends, expects, projects, believes or anticipates will or may occur in the future. Such statements are based on management’s beliefs and assumptions made based on information currently available to management. All statements in this communication, other than statements of historical fact, are forward-looking statements that may be identified by the use of the words “outlook,” “guidance,” “expects,” “believes,” “anticipates,” “should,” “estimates,” “intends,” “plans,” “seeks,” “targets,” “may,” “can,” “believe,” “predict,” “potential,” “projected,” “projections,” “precursor,” “forecast,” “ambition,” “goal,” “scheduled,” “think,” “could,” “would,” “will,” “see,” “likely,” and other similar expressions or variations, but not all forward-looking statements include such words. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties, and which may cause SLB’s or ChampionX’s actual results and performance to be materially different from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements. Factors and risks that may impact future results and performance include, but are not limited to those factors and risks described in Part I, “Item 1. Business”, “Item 1A. Risk Factors”, and “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in SLB’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on January 24, 2024 and Part 1, Item 1A, “Risk Factors” in ChampionX’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023 filed with the SEC on February 6, 2024, and each of their respective, subsequent Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K. These include, but are not limited to, and in each case as a possible result of the proposed transaction on each of SLB and ChampionX: the ultimate outcome of the proposed transaction between SLB and ChampionX, including the effect of the announcement of the proposed transaction; the ability to operate the SLB and ChampionX respective businesses, including business disruptions; difficulties in retaining and hiring key personnel and employees; the ability to maintain favorable business relationships with customers, suppliers and other business partners; the terms and timing of the proposed transaction; the occurrence of any event, change or other circumstance that could give rise to the termination of the proposed transaction; the anticipated or actual tax treatment of the proposed transaction; the ability to satisfy closing conditions to the completion of the proposed transaction (including the adoption of the merger agreement in respect of the proposed transaction by ChampionX stockholders); other risks related to the completion of the proposed transaction and actions related thereto; the ability of SLB and ChampionX to integrate the business successfully and to achieve anticipated synergies and value creation from the proposed transaction; changes in demand for SLB’s or ChampionX’s products and services; global market, political and economic conditions, including in the countries in which SLB and ChampionX operate; the ability to secure government regulatory approvals on the terms expected, at all or in a timely manner; the extent of growth of the oilfield services market generally, including for chemical solutions in production and midstream operations; the global macro-economic environment, including headwinds caused by inflation, rising interest rates, unfavorable currency exchange rates, and potential recessionary or depressionary conditions; the impact of shifts in prices or margins of the products that SLB or ChampionX sells or services that SLB or ChampionX provides, including due to a shift towards lower margin products or services; cyber-attacks, information security and data privacy; the impact of public health crises, such as pandemics (including COVID-19) and epidemics and any related company or government policies and actions to protect the health and safety of individuals or government policies or actions to maintain the functioning of national or global economies and markets; trends in crude oil and natural gas prices, including trends in chemical solutions across the oil and natural gas industries, that may affect the drilling and production activity, profitability and financial stability of SLB’s and ChampionX’s customers and therefore the demand for, and profitability of, their products and services; litigation and regulatory proceedings, including any proceedings that may be instituted against SLB or ChampionX related to the proposed transaction; failure to effectively and timely address energy transitions that could adversely affect the businesses of SLB or ChampionX, results of operations, and cash flows of SLB or ChampionX; and disruptions of SLB’s or ChampionX’s information technology systems.

    These risks, as well as other risks related to the proposed transaction, are included in the Form S-4 and proxy statement/prospectus that was filed with the SEC in connection with the proposed transaction. While the list of factors presented here is, and the list of factors presented in the registration statement on Form S-4 are, considered representative, no such list should be considered to be a complete statement of all potential risks and uncertainties. For additional information about other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements, please refer to SLB’s and ChampionX’s respective periodic reports and other filings with the SEC, including the risk factors identified in SLB’s and ChampionX’s Annual Reports on Form 10-K, respectively, and SLB’s and ChampionX’s subsequent Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q. The forward-looking statements included in this communication are made only as of the date hereof. Neither SLB nor ChampionX undertakes any obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstances, except as required by law.

    Investor Contact: Byron Pope
    byron.pope@championx.com 
    281-602-0094

    Media Contact: John Breed
    john.breed@championx.com 
    281-403-5751

    CHAMPIONX CORPORATION
    CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
    (UNAUDITED)

      Three Months Ended   Nine Months Ended
      September 30,   June 30,   September 30,   September 30,
    (in thousands, except per share amounts)   2024       2024       2023       2024       2023  
    Revenue $ 906,533     $ 893,272     $ 939,783     $ 2,721,946     $ 2,814,730  
    Cost of goods and services   608,764       613,426       647,923       1,845,127       1,957,309  
    Gross profit   297,769       279,846       291,860       876,819       857,421  
    Costs and expenses:                  
    Selling, general and administrative expense   180,501       182,995       162,317       535,910       485,617  
    (Gain) loss on sale-leaseback transaction and disposal group   57       —       —       (29,826 )     12,965  
    Interest expense, net   14,137       15,421       13,744       43,493       40,754  
    Foreign currency transaction (gains) losses, net   3,505       (2,767 )     7,992       793       21,683  
    Other expense (income), net   (2,176 )     938       (1,994 )     1,689       (13,494 )
    Income before income taxes   101,745       83,259       109,801       324,760       309,896  
    Provision for income taxes   28,078       27,868       29,009       82,542       69,334  
    Net income   73,667       55,391       80,792       242,218       240,562  
    Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest   1,659       2,822       3,081       4,718       3,522  
    Net income attributable to ChampionX $ 72,008     $ 52,569     $ 77,711     $ 237,500     $ 237,040  
                       
    Earnings per share attributable to ChampionX:                  
    Basic $ 0.38     $ 0.28     $ 0.40     $ 1.25     $ 1.20  
    Diluted $ 0.37     $ 0.27     $ 0.39     $ 1.23     $ 1.18  
                       
    Weighted-average shares outstanding:                  
    Basic   190,496       190,426       195,881       190,575       197,058  
    Diluted   193,362       193,257       199,592       193,655       201,025  
                                           

    CHAMPIONX CORPORATION
    CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
    (UNAUDITED)

    (in thousands) September 30, 2024   December 31, 2023
    ASSETS      
    Current Assets:      
    Cash and cash equivalents $ 389,109     $ 288,557  
    Receivables, net   434,107       534,534  
    Inventories, net   546,817       521,549  
    Prepaid expenses and other current assets   68,218       80,777  
    Total current assets   1,438,251       1,425,417  
           
    Property, plant and equipment, net   760,775       773,552  
    Goodwill   729,783       669,064  
    Intangible assets, net   270,361       243,553  
    Other non-current assets   178,490       130,116  
    Total assets $ 3,377,660     $ 3,241,702  
           
    LIABILITIES AND EQUITY      
    Current Liabilities:      
    Current portion of long-term debt $ 6,203     $ 6,203  
    Accounts payable   455,485       451,680  
    Other current liabilities   278,498       324,866  
    Total current liabilities   740,186       782,749  
           
    Long-term debt   592,161       594,283  
    Other long-term liabilities   246,296       203,639  
    Stockholders’ equity:      
    ChampionX stockholders’ equity   1,814,310       1,676,622  
    Noncontrolling interest   (15,293 )     (15,591 )
    Total liabilities and equity $ 3,377,660     $ 3,241,702  
                   

    CHAMPIONX CORPORATION
    CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
    (UNAUDITED)

      Nine Months Ended September 30,
    (in thousands)   2024       2023  
    Cash flows from operating activities:      
    Net income $ 242,218     $ 240,562  
    Depreciation and amortization   183,291       177,226  
    (Gain) loss on sale-leaseback transaction and disposal group   (29,826 )     12,965  
    Loss on Argentina Blue Chip Swap transaction   7,086       —  
    Deferred income taxes   (16,810 )     (15,380 )
    Loss (gain) on disposal of fixed assets   868       (1,480 )
    Receivables   115,269       85,181  
    Inventories   (40,118 )     (50,011 )
    Accounts payable   (30,577 )     (7,018 )
    Other assets   6,665       17,470  
    Leased assets   (24,193 )     (38,597 )
    Other operating items, net   (31,442 )     (49,600 )
    Net cash flows provided by operating activities   382,431       371,318  
           
    Cash flows from investing activities:      
    Capital expenditures   (101,403 )     (110,965 )
    Proceeds from sale of fixed assets   9,323       12,328  
    Proceeds from sale-leaseback transaction   44,292       —  
    Purchase of investments   (31,526 )     —  
    Sale of investments   24,358       —  
    Acquisitions, net of cash acquired   (123,269 )     —  
    Net cash used for investing activities   (178,225 )     (98,637 )
           
    Cash flows from financing activities:      
    Proceeds from long-term debt   —       15,500  
    Repayment of long-term debt   (4,652 )     (43,625 )
    Repurchases of common stock   (49,399 )     (159,730 )
    Dividends paid   (52,430 )     (48,309 )
    Other   3,854       (384 )
    Net cash used for financing activities   (102,627 )     (236,548 )
           
    Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents   (1,027 )     (1,314 )
           
    Net increase in cash and cash equivalents   100,552       34,819  
    Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period   288,557       250,187  
    Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ 389,109     $ 285,006  
                   

    CHAMPIONX CORPORATION
    BUSINESS SEGMENT DATA
    (UNAUDITED)

      Three Months Ended
      September 30,   June 30,   September 30,
    (in thousands)   2024       2024       2023  
    Segment revenue:          
    Production Chemical Technologies $ 559,539     $ 569,577     $ 604,254  
    Production & Automation Technologies   275,700       244,487       256,148  
    Drilling Technologies   51,792       52,888       54,869  
    Reservoir Chemical Technologies   20,531       27,123       25,093  
    Corporate and other   (1,029 )     (803 )     (581 )
    Total revenue $ 906,533     $ 893,272     $ 939,783  
               
    Income before income taxes:        
    Segment operating profit (loss):          
    Production Chemical Technologies $ 87,260     $ 85,388     $ 94,560  
    Production & Automation Technologies   34,136       22,207       28,299  
    Drilling Technologies   11,501       11,863       12,255  
    Reservoir Chemical Technologies   1,675       4,363       2,461  
    Total segment operating profit   134,572       123,821       137,575  
    Corporate and other   18,690       25,141       14,030  
    Interest expense, net   14,137       15,421       13,744  
    Income before income taxes $ 101,745     $ 83,259     $ 109,801  
               
    Operating profit margin / income before income taxes margin:          
    Production Chemical Technologies   15.6 %     15.0 %     15.6 %
    Production & Automation Technologies   12.4 %     9.1 %     11.0 %
    Drilling Technologies   22.2 %     22.4 %     22.3 %
    Reservoir Chemical Technologies   8.2 %     16.1 %     9.8 %
    ChampionX Consolidated   11.2 %     9.3 %     11.7 %
               
    Adjusted EBITDA          
    Production Chemical Technologies $ 120,622     $ 117,421     $ 133,101  
    Production & Automation Technologies   69,604       58,848       59,288  
    Drilling Technologies   12,867       13,149       13,786  
    Reservoir Chemical Technologies   3,292       5,954       4,198  
    Corporate and other   (8,873 )     (12,139 )     (12,837 )
    Adjusted EBITDA $ 197,512     $ 183,233     $ 197,536  
               
    Adjusted EBITDA margin          
    Production Chemical Technologies   21.6 %     20.6 %     22.0 %
    Production & Automation Technologies   25.2 %     24.1 %     23.1 %
    Drilling Technologies   24.8 %     24.9 %     25.1 %
    Reservoir Chemical Technologies   16.0 %     22.0 %     16.7 %
    ChampionX Consolidated   21.8 %     20.5 %     21.0 %
                           

    CHAMPIONX CORPORATION
    RECONCILIATIONS OF GAAP TO NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES
    (UNAUDITED)

      Three Months Ended
      September 30,   June 30,   September 30,
    (in thousands)   2024       2024       2023  
    Net income attributable to ChampionX $ 72,008     $ 52,569     $ 77,711  
    Pre-tax adjustments:          
    (Gain) loss on sale leaseback transaction and disposal group(1)   57       —       —  
    Russia sanctions compliance and impacts(2)   109       32       95  
    Restructuring and other related charges   5,317       7,927       1,228  
    Merger transaction costs(3)   8,312       15,059       —  
    Acquisition costs and related adjustments(4)   753       574       —  
    Intellectual property defense   69       531       220  
    Merger-related indemnification responsibility   —       —       722  
    Tulsa, Oklahoma storm damage   —       —       1,895  
    Foreign currency transaction (gains) losses, net   3,505       (2,767 )     7,992  
    Loss on Argentina Blue Chip Swap transaction   —       2,994       —  
    Tax impact of adjustments   (4,259 )     (5,722 )     (2,702 )
    Adjusted net income attributable to ChampionX   85,871       71,197       87,161  
    Tax impact of adjustments   4,259       5,722       2,702  
    Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest   1,659       2,822       3,081  
    Depreciation and amortization   63,508       60,203       61,839  
    Provision for income taxes   28,078       27,868       29,009  
    Interest expense, net   14,137       15,421       13,744  
    Adjusted EBITDA $ 197,512     $ 183,233     $ 197,536  

    _______________________

    (1) Amount represents the gain on the sale and leaseback of certain buildings and land.
    (2) Includes charges incurred related to legal and professional fees to comply with, as well as additional foreign currency exchange losses associated with, the sanctions imposed in Russia.
    (3) Includes costs incurred in relation to the Merger Agreement with Schlumberger Limited, including third party legal and professional fees.
    (4) Includes costs incurred for the acquisition of businesses.
       
      Three Months Ended
      September 30,   June 30,   September 30,
    (in thousands)   2024       2024       2023  
    Diluted earnings per share attributable to ChampionX $ 0.37     $ 0.27     $ 0.39  
    Per share adjustments:          
    (Gain) loss on sale leaseback transaction and disposal group   —       —       —  
    Russia sanctions compliance and impacts   —       —       —  
    Restructuring and other related charges   0.03       0.04       0.01  
    Merger transaction costs   0.04       0.08       —  
    Acquisition costs and related adjustments   —       —       —  
    Intellectual property defense   —       —       —  
    Merger-related indemnification responsibility   —       —       0.01  
    Tulsa, Oklahoma storm damage   —       —       0.01  
    Foreign currency transaction (gains) losses, net   0.02       (0.01 )     0.04  
    Loss on Argentina Blue Chip Swap transaction   —       0.02       —  
    Tax impact of adjustments   (0.02 )     (0.03 )     (0.02 )
    Adjusted diluted earnings per share attributable to ChampionX $ 0.44     $ 0.37     $ 0.44  
                           

    CHAMPIONX CORPORATION
    RECONCILIATIONS OF GAAP TO NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES BY SEGMENT
    (UNAUDITED)

      Three Months Ended
      September 30,   June 30,   September 30,
    (in thousands)   2024       2024       2023  
    Production Chemical Technologies          
    Segment operating profit $ 87,260     $ 85,388     $ 94,560  
    Non-GAAP adjustments   7,073       5,851       9,079  
    Depreciation and amortization   26,289       26,182       29,462  
    Segment adjusted EBITDA $ 120,622     $ 117,421     $ 133,101  
               
    Production & Automation Technologies          
    Segment operating profit $ 34,136     $ 22,207     $ 28,299  
    Non-GAAP adjustments   1,656       6,000       2,089  
    Depreciation and amortization   33,812       30,641       28,900  
    Segment adjusted EBITDA $ 69,604     $ 58,848     $ 59,288  
               
    Drilling Technologies          
    Segment operating profit $ 11,501     $ 11,863     $ 12,255  
    Non-GAAP adjustments   54       —       (8 )
    Depreciation and amortization   1,312       1,286       1,539  
    Segment adjusted EBITDA $ 12,867     $ 13,149     $ 13,786  
               
    Reservoir Chemical Technologies          
    Segment operating profit $ 1,675     $ 4,363     $ 2,461  
    Non-GAAP adjustments   3       11       72  
    Depreciation and amortization   1,614       1,580       1,665  
    Segment adjusted EBITDA $ 3,292     $ 5,954     $ 4,198  
               
    Corporate and other          
    Segment operating profit $ (32,827 )   $ (40,562 )   $ (27,774 )
    Non-GAAP adjustments   9,336       12,488       920  
    Depreciation and amortization   481       514       273  
    Interest expense, net   14,137       15,421       13,744  
    Segment adjusted EBITDA $ (8,873 )   $ (12,139 )   $ (12,837 )
                           

    Free Cash Flow

      Three Months Ended
      September 30,   June 30,   September 30,
    (in thousands)   2024       2024       2023  
    Free Cash Flow          
    Cash flows from operating activities $ 141,298     $ 67,625     $ 163,030  
    Less: Capital expenditures, net of proceeds from sale of fixed assets   (33,248 )     (29,310 )     (48,469 )
    Free cash flow $ 108,050     $ 38,315     $ 114,561  
               
    Cash From Operating Activities to Revenue Ratio          
    Cash flows from operating activities $ 141,298     $ 67,625     $ 163,030  
    Revenue $ 906,533     $ 893,272     $ 939,783  
               
    Cash from operating activities to revenue ratio   16 %     8 %     17 %
               
    Free Cash Flow to Revenue Ratio          
    Free cash flow $ 108,050     $ 38,315     $ 114,561  
    Revenue $ 906,533     $ 893,272     $ 939,783  
               
    Free cash flow to revenue ratio   12 %     4 %     12 %
               
    Free Cash Flow to Adjusted EBITDA Ratio          
    Free cash flow $ 108,050     $ 38,315     $ 114,561  
    Adjusted EBITDA $ 197,512     $ 183,233     $ 197,536  
               
    Free cash flow to adjusted EBITDA ratio   55 %     21 %     58 %

    The MIL Network –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Celebrating Bioenergy Day 2024 With a Research Retrospective

    Source: US National Renewable Energy Laboratory

    Over the past year NREL researchers made critical advancements for the bioeconomy including recyclable wind turbine blades, converting carbon dioxide to formic acid, biobased and biodegradable polyesters, and wastewater resource recovery using algae. Photos by NREL 

    The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) bioenergy research empowers the decarbonization of our nation’s industrial and transportation sectors and a circular bioeconomy through development and deployment of sustainable fuel, chemical, and polymer technologies.

    NREL researchers have been uncovering secrets about interesting methods and technologies such as biodegradable plastics, phosphorus-eating algae for resource recovery, sustainable aviation fuel (SAF), and converting carbon dioxide (CO2) to value-added chemicals.

    With National Bioenergy Day 2024 upon us, NREL reflects on some of the team’s scientific discoveries over the past year that have helped strengthen the bioeconomy.

    Bioenergy Research Highlights From Fiscal Year 2024

    Building Bridges Through Relationships and Photosynthesis Research

    How do you bring together long-time research friends and help develop STEM collaboration with historically marginalized institutions and a DOE national laboratory all in a way that ignites passions and furthers bioenergy research? Through the DOE Office of Science Visiting Faculty Program (VFP) of course! Check out how the VFP brought together old friends and new, while mentoring a new generation of STEM students to understand the energy-generating mysteries of blue-green algae.

    An NREL scientist holds small cubes of renewable biomass resin that can be used in wind turbine blades and can be recycled. Photo by Werner Slocum, NREL

    Advancing Methods for Recyclable, Plant-Based Wind Turbine Blades

    Researchers at NREL see a realistic path forward to the manufacture of wind turbine blades derived from renewable biomass. The chemical recycling process allows the components of the blades to be recaptured and reused again and again, allowing the remanufacture of the same product. This method has the potential to end the current practice of old blades winding up in landfills at the end of their useful life.

    Tools To Investigate How Organisms Control Energy at the Electron-Level

    In NREL’s Advanced Spin Resonance Facility there is a special technical capability called electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy that provides insight into the most basic energy carrier and unit, the electron. Demystifying the fundamental processes of how organisms control energy at the level of electrons is key to advancing the applied research and development of systems for generating sustainable low-carbon fuels, chemicals, and electricity.

    New Device Architecture Enables Streamlined Production of Formic Acid From CO₂ Using Renewable Electricity

    Formic acid is a potential intermediate chemical with many applications, especially as a raw material for the chemical or biomanufacturing industries and potential input for biological upgrading into SAF. A research team led by NREL developed a conversion pathway to produce formic acid from CO2 with high energy efficiency and durability while using renewable electricity. Analysis confirmed that this pathway is economically viable at scale and with use of commercially available components.

    The novel perforated cation exchange membrane (CEM) architecture in a CO₂ electrolyzer to achieve energy-efficient and durable formic acid production has a patent by K.C. Neyerlin and Leiming Hu pending. Illustration by Elizabeth Stone, NREL

    NREL Biomass Refining Technology a Cornerstone of SAFFiRE Renewables Biofuel Pilot Plant

    SAFFiRE Renewables LLC broke ground in August 2024 on its biofuel pilot plant in Kansas to turn agriculture residue into a scalable biofuel business. The company has licensed an NREL technology that uses an alkaline bath and mechanical shredder to prepare corn stover for ethanol fermentation—essential steps for accessing the energy-dense sugars locked inside. The new plant will not only help DOE with its SAF goals, but using lignocellulosic corn leaves, stalks, and cobs can also reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 88% to 108% on a life-cycle basis compared to conventional jet fuel.  

    WaterPACT Project To Quantify and Reduce Plastic Waste in U.S. Rivers

    With more than a million tons of plastic debris entering ocean-bound rivers, creeks, and sewer drains every year, it is essential to intercept this waste before it enters the ecosystems, communities, and ocean. To help solve this problem, the NREL-led Waterborne Plastics Assessment and Collection Technologies (WaterPACT) project is on a mission to develop renewable-energy-powered technologies that detect, quantify, and collect plastic from U.S. waterways.

    The WaterPACT research team collected plastic and water samples near the mouths of the Columbia, Delaware, Los Angeles, and Mississippi rivers. Each river has a unique watershed (the area of land that drains water to it) and volume of plastics emissions. Illustration by Elizabeth Stone, NREL

    The North Face Taps NREL-Led BOTTLE Consortium To Scale Biodegradable Polyester Alternative

    Polyester-based clothing sheds and disperses tiny microplastic fibers throughout homes, soils, and waterways, taking centuries to degrade. One potential solution is replacing today’s petroleum-derived polyester with a nontoxic, biodegradable alternative made from polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs). A team of BOTTLE consortium scientists from NREL and Colorado State University have developed a portfolio of PHAs that behave like conventional polyester but are biobased, biodegradable, and easier to recycle. In conjunction with The North Face, the BOTTLE team is scaling the process to produce several pounds of PHA fiber, which The North Face will test and evaluate for use in its product lines.

    $15 Million Multilaboratory Effort To Advance Commercialization of CO2 Removal

    Carbon dioxide removal technologies have potential to help mitigate climate change by addressing existing carbon emissions and removing them from the atmosphere. To achieve this goal, scientists must first establish robust scientific frameworks and methodologies to account for these efforts—giving governments and private buyers a unified approach to tracking the climate impacts of their investments. In support of this, DOE tapped NREL to support a new $15 million research effort to improve the measurement, reporting, and verification of CO2 removal technologies.

    On the Ground in Colorado, NREL Is Simulating SAF Combustion During Flight

    Public and private investments are helping accelerate production and use of SAF, an energy-dense, renewable fuel seen as essential for decarbonizing flight. Adopting SAF means proving the fuel is as safe and reliable as current fuels while being fully compatible with existing jet engines. NREL has developed computer simulations to predict how SAF performs during flight and provide insights on how to maximize its safety and performance. These simulated SAF combustion tests could determine if new fuels meet requirements before industry invests millions of dollars to produce large volumes for ASTM engine tests.

    The Dynamics of Jet Fuel Combustion—Researchers from NREL’s Computational Science Center look at a detailed simulation of sustainable aviation fuel as it combusts in a “virtual jet engine.” Photo by Joe DelNero, NREL

    NREL Researchers Produce First Macromolecular Model of Plant Secondary Cell Wall

    Lignocellulosic biomass has potential as a feedstock for low-carbon biobased fuels and chemicals. However, this biomass type is difficult to break down during the conversion process due to three layers of biopolymers. NREL scientists quantitatively defined the relative positioning and structure of the three biopolymer layers in Populus wood using solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance and molecular modeling. Having a computer model of the interplay of these three biopolymers will help design more efficient deconstruction approaches to convert renewable lignocellulosic biomass into better biobased materials.

    NREL Research Quantifies Losses From Cardboard, Paper Waste

    Of the estimated 110 million metric tons of paper and cardboard waste tossed out across the United States in 2019, approximately 56% was landfilled and 38% was recycled. This category of waste includes everything from newspapers and magazines to books and napkins, from junk mail and photographs to pizza boxes and milk cartons. New research from NREL showed that the estimated value for recovered postconsumer paper and carboard from landfills is $4 billion. Understanding this value can guide policymakers toward sustainable waste management practices and help researchers study the impact of implementing new waste-management technologies.

    Newly Identified Algal Strains Rich in Phosphorous Could Improve Wastewater Treatment

    Phosphorus in wastewater is a major contributor to harmful algal blooms in water bodies around the globe, with the potential to harm wildlife, livestock, and humans. To prevent this, wastewater treatment plants often rely on chemical- and energy-intensive techniques to remove phosphorus before it can impact downstream water bodies. NREL researchers developed the Revolving Algal Biofilm system for phosphorus removal from wastewater by maximizing the ability of algae to harness solar energy to efficiently accumulate and remove phosphorus from water.

    A close-up of algal biofilm on a RAB system is shown on the left. On the right is a dried algal fertilizer product produced from the system. Photos from Gross-Wen Technologies

    Pick Your Polymer Properties and This NREL Tool Predicts How To Achieve Them With Biomass

    Petroleum-based polymers form the building blocks of plastics. Plastics can be made out of renewable biomass and waste resources, but identifying the right chemistry to make biobased polymers more sustainable and higher performing is the challenge. An NREL machine learning tool, PolyID™: Polymer Inverse Design, makes it easier to identify biobased polymers for use in plastics. Using artificial intelligence, the tool can screen millions of possible biobased polymer designs to create a short list of candidates for a given application.

    Learn more about NREL’s bioenergy research.

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI Security: New Castle Man Sentenced to 51 Months in Prison for Fentanyl and Cocaine Trafficking

    Source: United States Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco Firearms and Explosives (ATF)

    PITTSBURGH, Pa. – A resident of New Castle, Pennsylvania, has been sentenced to 51 months in federal prison for trafficking fentanyl and cocaine, United States Attorney Eric G. Olshan announced today.

    Senior United States District Judge Arthur J. Schwab imposed the sentence on Dontae Blackshear, 26, also ordering Blackshear to serve six years of supervised release following his prison term. Blackshear previously pleaded guilty in this case to conspiring to distribute fentanyl and cocaine between May 2021 and October 2022.

    According to information presented to the Court, Blackshear was responsible for trafficking 20 grams of fentanyl and 100 grams of cocaine in 2022. He was on state parole at that time following a 2021 heroin trafficking conviction and prison sentence. The 2021 conviction was preceded by several convictions in separate state prosecutions since 2016, including for assault, two violent burglaries, fleeing/eluding, and conspiracy to commit theft.

    Assistant United States Attorney Craig W. Haller prosecuted this case on behalf of the United States.

    United States Attorney Olshan commended the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Pennsylvania Office of Attorney General, United States Postal Inspection Service, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, Lawrence County Drug Task Force, Mercer County Drug Task Force, New Castle Police Department, Sharon Police Department, and Pennsylvania State Police for the investigation leading to the successful prosecution of Blackshear.

    MIL Security OSI –

  • MIL-OSI Security: Maidstone — Update: Maidstone RCMP seek information about suspicious person

    Source: Royal Canadian Mounted Police

    As a result of continued investigation, Maidstone RCMP identified the adult male who approached and spoke to a young child at a playground at Sandy Beach Regional Park on August 27, 2024.

    Further investigation determined the male was on court-ordered peace bond conditions not to be at a playground.

    On October 16, 2024, officers arrested the adult male at a residence in Radisson, SK.

    Officers located and seized three loaded, unsecured firearms during a search warrant executed at the residence.

    As a result of continued investigation, 47-year-old Sir Brent Habetler from Radisson is charged with:

    • one count, disobeying an order of court, Section 127(1), Criminal Code;
    • one count, unauthorized possession of a firearm, Section 91(1), Criminal Code;
    • three counts, unsafe storage of a firearm, Section 86(2), Criminal Code;
    • one count, possession of a weapon for a dangerous purpose, Section 88(1), Criminal Code; and
    • one count, possession of a firearm knowing possession is unauthorized, Section 92(1), Criminal Code.

    He was remanded into custody and appeared in North Battleford Provincial Court on October 22, 2024.

    He was released by the courts on conditions that include the following, among others:

    • Staying inside his approved residence 24 hours a day. This condition will be electronically monitored as per his conditions.
    • Not attend any area that children (below the age of 16) are typically present for the purposes of schooling or recreation.
    • Not possess any firearms.

    He is next scheduled to appear in North Battleford Provincial Court on November 26, 2024.

    Saskatchewan RCMP’s Battleford General Investigations Section, High Risk Offender Unit, Warrant Enforcement and Suppression Team, Crime Reduction Team and Federal Support Services assisted with this investigation, along with Saskatchewan Highway Patrol and Wilton Police Service.

    MIL Security OSI –

  • MIL-OSI Security: Saskatchewan — UPDATE – Saskatchewan RCMP: subjects of AMBER Alert found safe, investigation continues

    Source: Royal Canadian Mounted Police

    October 17, 2024
    Saskatchewan, Saskatchewan

    News release

    Saskatchewan RCMP’s Prince Albert General Investigation Section (GIS) took carriage of the investigation into the incident that resulted in an AMBER Alert being issued on the afternoon of October 17.

    After subsequent investigation, it has been determined that no charges will be laid at this time in relation to the incident.

    “The immediate police response and resulting AMBER Alert helped us locate the baby quickly – and ensure his safety,” says Insp. Ashley St. Germaine from Saskatchewan RCMP Major Crimes. “This situation is testament to the power of the Saskatchewan AMBER Alert program. We sincerely thank members of the public and our news partners for their assistance with this investigation, which thankfully had a positive outcome.”

    We are unable to provide additional details about the incident – or the child – as there is no current court process attached to it and to be mindful of the privacy of the baby.

    Officers from Waskesiu/Montreal Lake RCMP, Big River RCMP and many other units and detachments from across the province assisted in this investigation.

    Because we have received an inquiry, we would like to confirm that the adult male named in the AMBER Alert appeared in Prince Albert Provincial Court this morning on one charge of assault and one charge of assault by choking in relation to a recent incident on Montreal Lake Cree Nation. The victim was an adult female, who reported non-life-threatening injuries to police. To maintain the privacy of the victim, no further details will be provided at this time, including naming the charged male.

    –30–

    Backgrounder

    Saskatchewan RCMP: subjects of AMBER Alert found safe, investigation continues

    2024-10-17

    On October 17, 2024 just before 2 p.m., Waskesiu/Montreal Lake RCMP received a report that a five-day-old baby had been taken from a residence on Montreal Lake Cree Nation.

    Waskesiu/Montreal Lake RCMP immediately responded. Investigation determined the baby had been taken by his father.

    Subsequent investigation led to Saskatchewan RCMP determining the incident met the criteria for the issuance of an AMBER Alert. The alert was issued at approximately 5:08 p.m.

    Note that the alert stated the baby was taken from the health clinic. This information, gathered during the initial response, was incorrect.

    Shortly after, the father turned himself in without incident at the Big River RCMP detachment.

    Officers assessed the baby, who appeared healthy and safe. EMS was called to assess him as a precaution.

    The investigation continues.

    We thank our media partners and the public for their assistance with this investigation.

    CANCELLED: Amber Alert Child Abduction Notification

    2024-10-17

    The baby has been located in Big River. He appears safe and will be assessed by EMS. The suspect is in custody.

    Thank you to the media and the public for their assistance in this investigation. Please remove their names and photos from circulation, including social media. Thank you for your cooperation.

    The investigation is ongoing. We will provide more information as soon as we are able to.

    Please report any information to 310-RCMP.

    MIL Security OSI –

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Interview with Matt Shirvington, Sunrise, Channel 7

    Source: Australian Treasurer

    MATT SHIRVINGTON:

    Welcome back. Well, the Department of Finance has announced over $14 million worth of funding in an effort to make Australia the hardest target for scammers. The new proposals come as the government aims to crack down on fraud, ensuring victims are able to seek compensation through a new, streamlined service. For more Financial Services Minister Stephen Jones joins us now. Great to have you with us. So, how will this new funding benefit victims straight off?

    STEPHEN JONES:

    The situation at the moment is the law is really grey on what the obligations on banks, on telecommunications companies and social media platforms are to keep their customers safe. I’m introducing new laws into parliament in the next few weeks which will raise the bar significant new protections for consumers, but also ensuring they have a single front door to go through when something goes wrong and they’re unable to resolve their complaint. That front door will be the Australian Financial Complaints Authority. Significant uplift in funding, $14.7 million so they can deal with a caseload of complaints that they’re going to have to deal with. So, if I could put it simply, new obligations, new – new avenues for redress, Australian consumers better off.

    SHIRVINGTON:

    The main thing, I think, for most people when they get targeted and scammed is the speed of some sort of resolution. Is it going to speed that up?

    JONES:

    Absolutely. There’ll be stronger obligations on banks, dispute resolution processes and an independent tribunal if things can’t be resolved. And I’ll ensure that there’s a fast track process in there as well, to ensure that people can raise their complaints. A lot of it will be, I want my money back, but a lot of it will also be, can you pull down that fake webpage?

    SHIRVINGTON:

    Yes.

    JONES:

    That is impersonating me. That is impersonating a bank or a telecommunications company. Pull down that material because people are being lured into losing money through that. So, there’s a range of complaints, new avenues to be able to deal with that.

    SHIRVINGTON:

    That’s fantastic. Thank you so much for joining us. The other thing that piques my interest too is the SMS sender ID registry that you’re implementing, which will mean it won’t pop up on those SMS threads from the banks as well. Appreciate your time this morning.

    JONES:

    Good to be with you.

    MIL OSI News –

  • MIL-OSI Video: Ahead of the Threat Podcast: Episode One

    Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) (video statements)

    In December 2021, UKG Kronos was hit with a ransomware attack that impacted thousands of business customers.

    On this episode of Ahead of the Threat, co-hosts Bryan Vorndran, assistant director of the FBI’s Cyber Division, and Jamil Farshchi, a strategic engagement advisor for the FBI, speak to Aaron Ain, former CEO and current Executive Chair at UKG, who gives a firsthand account of what it’s like to lead a multinational technology company during major cyber incident. Learn how Aaron handled the extreme pressure of the situation, prioritized transparency to rebuild customer trust, and made enduring structural reforms to supply-chain security and cybersecurity at the board level.

    At the start of the episode, Bryan and Jamil discuss trending topics like Iran’s brazen effort to interfere in the 2024 U.S. presidential election, the Salt Typhoon hack of U.S. telecoms, and recent supply chain compromises.
    —————————————————
    Subscribe to Inside the FBI wherever you get your podcasts:
    Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/4H2d3cg…
    Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast…
    Google Podcasts: https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0…
    More ways to follow us: https://inside-the-fbi.transistor.fm/…

    Follow us on social media:
    X: https://twitter.com/fbi
    Facebook: https://facebook.com/FBI
    Instagram: https://instagram.com/fbi
    YouTube: youtube.com/user/fbi

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xOsOCAaH2Ms

    MIL OSI Video –

  • MIL-OSI USA: ICYMI: US Navy: Projecting Strength and Building the Fleet of Tomorrow

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for South Carolina Lindsey Graham

    US Navy: Projecting Strength and Building the Fleet of Tomorrow

    By Senator Lindsey Graham and Morgan Ortagus

    Fox News

    October 23, 2024

    https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/us-navy-projecting-strength-and-building-fleet-tomorrow

    It’s time for all Americans to grasp a hard truth: in a world that may be on the brink of World War III, our military budgets are inconsistent with the threats we face. This is especially the case with the budget of the Department of the Navy.  

    The bad news: the current Navy budget will not make a stronger military or a larger U.S. fleet a reality. The good news: through American innovation and more agile products, we can build a bigger and more efficient Navy.  

    However, President Biden’s proposed FY2025 budget of $257.6 billion for the Department of the Navy is well below inflation and does not provide for a more lethal Navy. 

    As both President Biden and President Trump certified, the most direct challenge facing the U.S. Navy today is from the People’s Republic of China. Therefore, strong investments must be made now to ensure the Navy, and most importantly the United States, can meet this threat head-on.

    It comes as no shock to the reader that America and its allies and partners are facing an unprecedented deluge of maritime threats by the People’s Republic of China. The Chinese Navy alone has provoked a U.S. destroyer in the Taiwan Strait with dangerous maneuvers, harassed Taiwan with aggressive military exercises, entered America’s Exclusive Economic Zone in the Bering Sea, developed a jam-resistant submarine torpedo, and injured several Filipino sailors at and around Second Thomas Shoal.  

    These developments incrementally set the conditions for a direct conflict on the open seas. Meanwhile, Washington has been lulled into complacency by decades of maritime supremacy. Most concerning, the United States lacks the political resolve to shed the Navy’s Soviet-era mentality and adapt to the new era of great power competition. 

    To meet the moment’s maritime threats, America must choose between tough and tougher: make significant investments in our fleet or face the costs of inaction.

    Section One: Expanding U.S. Shipbuilding Capacity and Cooperation with Allies

    Our shipbuilding industrial base is grappling with significant delays and challenges, affecting major programs like the Columbia-class submarines, Constellation-class frigates, and Ford-class carriers. These delays are not only impacting the procurement of new ships, they are also impacting the ability to maintain the current fleet. 

    A great first step to combating the maritime threats our nation faces is to expand the physical footprint of the U.S. shipbuilding industry.  

    The U.S. shipbuilding industry is first in its class and the men and women that come to work every day in our nation’s shipyards build the world’s most lethal and capable warships. In states like South Carolina, there are a wealth of maritime industry suppliers and shipbuilders diligently producing the necessary components to construct our nation’s ships.  

    But that alone is not enough. China’s Bohai Shipyard boasts an annual capacity exceeding the total number of ships our Navy has launched since 2014.  

    In addition, China is rapidly expanding its existing shipyards and according to experts “has been investing so much in shipbuilding over the past 18 years that it can now build more ships in a month than the United States can in a year.” 

    By comparison, America only has four public shipyards and these yards focus on maintenance of submarines and aircraft carriers and not the construction of new vessels.

    The Department of the Navy should look at states like South Carolina to build new shipyards to maximize the U.S. shipbuilding capacity and our maritime industry. 

    In addition, the Navy must expand maintenance capacity here in the states as well as in the Pacific. The U.S. Navy has already decided to augment its capacity by placing a submarine maintenance facility in Guam. This should be replicated for other vessels elsewhere. 

    It is clear that the need for more shipbuilding capacity is great and immediate. Investing here at home will certainly help address the need. At the same time, our nation should also not discount opportunities to work with others when the opportunity presents itself.  

    The U.S. Navy cannot afford to leave any stone unturned when thinking of innovative ways to grow the fleet as quickly as possible.

    Section Two: Fleet Requirements and Capabilities

    A fundamental step toward a 21st-century U.S. Navy is improving both the size and modernity of our existing fleet. The fleet currently consists of carriers, surface combatants, submarines, amphibious warships, combat logistics ships, fleet support vessels and mine warfare assets.  

    Yet this fleet is hardly agile or scalable enough to meet a Chinese maritime threat that includes drones, hypersonic missiles and other high-tech tools of warcraft.

    Persistent gaps also remain in amphibious warfare and in contested logistics. Amphibious combat vehicles, landing vessels, and light warships are all needed in higher quantities for rapid and effective landings. 

    Unmanned and underwater systems are especially relevant to modern naval operations. Often at a fraction of the cost of manned vessels, these vessels – both large and small – perform intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance missions, logistics and strike operations.  

    They also relieve pressure on our high-demand, low-density assets while augmenting the fleet. The proof is in their success in Ukraine, where naval drones have successfully countered Russia’s Black Sea Fleet, forcing them into safe harbors and destroying dozens of Russian vessels.

    In addition to their combat roles, unmanned systems are revolutionizing naval logistics. Unmanned logistics platforms can autonomously deliver supplies, ammunition, and fuel to forward-deployed forces, significantly extending the operational reach of our fleet.  

    These systems reduce the need for manned resupply missions, which are often vulnerable to enemy attacks, thereby enhancing the safety and efficiency of our operations. By integrating unmanned logistics into our naval strategy, we can maintain sustained operations in contested environments, ensuring our forces remain equipped and ready for extended engagements.

    A possible way to advance the construction of these unmanned vessels is through an international partnership. Such a partnership could be modeled after the trilateral security partnership between the United States, the United Kingdom and Australia (AUKUS) for submarine production in Australia. An AUKUS-like agreement for unmanned systems could create a new pathway for faster construction of these unmanned platforms and increase the integration between partners.

    China’s naval power is growing at an alarming rate, with close to 400 ships currently in service and projections of 435 by 2030. The impact of this expansion is worsened by our diminishing technology gap, as China advances its naval technology while the U.S. Navy struggles to build ships.  

    Meanwhile, the U.S. Navy’s latest shipbuilding assessment calls for 381 battle force ships (carriers, destroyers, amphibious ships, submarines, etc.) and 134 unmanned vehicles, totaling 515 vessels.  

    While it is great to have a roadmap, the U.S. Navy’s own shipbuilding plan projects that we would not reach 381 battle force ships until 2043 under the best scenario. This delay poses an unacceptable risk to our national security and could force our sailors into a fight they are underequipped to win.

    To avoid that scenario and reduce the exposure of manned ships to enemy attacks, we must expedite shipbuilding with a focus on unmanned surface and subsurface systems that are affordable and quick to produce. America does not have to win a shipbuilding foot race, but we must strategically invest in both the capabilities and capacities to counter China’s growing maritime capabilities and protect our interests.

    Section Three: Funding the Department of the Navy

    The U.S. military budget is woefully underfunded for the threats our nation faces today. The U.S. is on target to spend only 3.1% of total GDP on defense in Fiscal Year 2025 and that percentage is projected to fall to a paltry 2.4% in 2034 under the Biden-Harris budget plan.  

    Budgetary “business as usual” will only widen the gap between U.S. and Chinese naval capabilities. With China’s defense budget growing in both size and sophistication, it is imperative the United States make greater, and smarter, investments of our own. 

    Increasing funding for the Navy’s ship procurement, known as the Shipbuilding and Conversion account, alone will not be enough.  In order to address the shipbuilding problem, Congress should consider a comprehensive approach that includes strong and consistent funding across procurement, operations and maintenance, research and development, personnel and military construction accounts.  

    In order to do this, Congress will need to think outside the box as the current budgetary restraints limit the needed investments. Congress should form a “Fleet Investment Fund” – codifying the Navy’s entire budget growth at least 5% above inflation and more than the department’s topline request – covering all aspects of naval development and readiness. 

    Most importantly, this account should not be subject to any caps or restrictions within the president’s budget request to Congress each fiscal year. The formation of this account must be seen as a national imperative.

    Conclusion

    There is no doubt that the costs of these investments are great and will require tradeoffs and significant political capital, but the costs of inaction will be far greater. History demonstrates that adversaries are emboldened by America’s hesitation and deterred by its resolve. History proves that the U.S. Navy can adapt to evolving defense needs. 

    Since 1945, America has served as the global guarantor of open seas and freedom of navigation in contested waterways and critical trade routes. President Theodore Roosevelt stated before Congress in 1902 that “a good Navy is not a provocation to war. It is the surest guaranty of peace.”

    Morgan Ortagus is the founder of Polaris National Security and formerly served as the spokesperson for the U.S. State Department under President Trump. 

    Republican Lindsey Graham represents South Carolina in the United States Senate. 

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI: Bold Eagle Acquisition Corp., Led by Eagle Equity Partners’ Harry Sloan, Jeff Sagansky and Eli Baker, Announces Pricing of $250 million IPO

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Bold Eagle Will Feature a Warrantless Structure

    Each Unit Includes One Class A Ordinary Share and
    One Eagle Share Right to Receive 1/20th of a Class A Ordinary Share

    Sponsor to Reduce Founder Shares in an Amount Equal to the Shares Underlying the Eagle Share Rights

    NEW YORK, NY, Oct. 23, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Bold Eagle Acquisition Corp. (the “Company”), the ninth public acquisition vehicle sponsored by Eagle Equity Partners, which is led by Harry Sloan, Jeff Sagansky and Eli Baker, today announced the pricing on October 23, 2024 of its initial public offering of 25,000,000 units at a price of $10.00 per unit. Each unit consists of one Class A ordinary share and one Eagle Share Right to receive one twentieth of one Class A ordinary share upon the consummation of an initial business combination. There are no warrants issued publicly or privately in connection with this offering and, after the closing of the initial public offering, the Company’s sponsor will reduce its founder shares in an amount equal to the Class A ordinary shares underlying the Eagle Share Rights. An amount equal to $10.00 per unit will be deposited into a trust account upon the closing of the offering. The units will be listed on the Nasdaq Global Market (“Nasdaq”) and trade under the ticker symbol “BEAGU” beginning on October 24, 2024. After the securities comprising the units begin separate trading, the Class A ordinary shares and Eagle Share Rights are expected to be listed on Nasdaq under the symbols “BEAG” and “BEAGR,” respectively. The offering is expected to close on October 25, 2024.

    Bold Eagle Acquisition Corp. is a blank check company whose business purpose is to effect a merger, share exchange, asset acquisition, share purchase, reorganization or similar business combination with one or more businesses. The Company’s efforts to identify a prospective initial business combination target will not be limited to a particular industry, sector or geographic region. While the Company may pursue an initial business combination opportunity in any industry or sector, it intends to capitalize on the ability of its management team to identify and combine with a business or businesses that can benefit from its management team’s established global relationships and operating experience.

    The Company’s sponsor is Eagle Equity Partners IV, LLC, of which Harry Sloan, Jeff Sagansky and Eli Baker are Managing Members. Harry Sloan and Jeff Sagansky are the Co-Chairmen of the Company. Joining Mr. Sloan and Mr. Sagansky in the management of the Company is Eli Baker, the Chief Executive Officer, who has served in various capacities in seven of Eagle Equity’s prior public acquisition vehicles, most recently as Chief Executive Officer of Screaming Eagle Acquisition Corp. Also joining Mr. Sloan, Mr. Sagansky and Mr. Baker in the management of the Company is Ryan O’Connor, the Chief Financial Officer, who previously served as the Vice President of Finance of Screaming Eagle Acquisition Corp.

    UBS Investment Bank and Jefferies are acting as the representatives of the underwriters for the offering. The Company has granted the underwriters a 45-day option to purchase up to an additional 3,750,000 units at the initial public offering price to cover over-allotments, if any.

    The offering is being made only by means of a prospectus. When available, copies of the prospectus may be obtained from UBS Securities LLC, Attention: Prospectus Department, 1285 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10019, by telephone at (888) 827-7275 or by email at ol-prospectusrequest@ubs.com or from Jefferies LLC, Attn: Equity Syndicate Prospectus Department, 520 Madison Avenue, 2nd Floor, New York, NY 10022, by telephone: 877-821-7388 or by email: Prospectus_Department@Jefferies.com.

    A registration statement relating to these securities has been declared effective by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on October 23, 2024. This press release shall not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, nor shall there be any sale of these securities in any State or jurisdiction in which such an offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior to registration or qualification under the securities laws of any such State or jurisdiction.

    Cautionary Note Concerning Forward-Looking Statements

    This press release contains statements that constitute “forward-looking statements,” including with respect to the initial public offering and search for an initial business combination. No assurance can be given that the offering discussed above will be completed on the terms described, or at all, or that the proceeds of the offering will be used as indicated. Forward-looking statements are subject to numerous conditions, many of which are beyond the control of the Company, including those set forth in the Risk Factors section of the Company’s registration statement for the initial public offering filed with the SEC. Copies are available on the SEC’s website, www.sec.gov. The Company undertakes no obligation to update these statements for revisions or changes after the date of this release, except as required by law.

    # # #

    INVESTOR AND MEDIA CONTACT:

    Ryan O’Connor
    t. (424) 284-3519 
    e. roconnor@eaglesinvest.com

    The MIL Network –

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: 30,000 households get FamilyBoost payments

    Source: New Zealand Government

    Almost 30,000 households have now received their first payments under the FamilyBoost childcare payment scheme and thousands more will receive them soon, Finance Minister Nicola Willis says.

     “In total, $11.5 million has been paid out to 29,805 households after only three weeks of claims being open,” Nicola Willis says.

     “High housing, food and childcare costs have made life tough for many families in recent years, so I am delighted that at the same time as interest rates are coming down, we are able to relieve more of the pressure on people’s wallets. 

     “Around 100,000 households a year are estimated to be eligible for FamilyBoost, which is a payment to parents and caregivers of 25 per cent of their early childhood education costs – up to $150 a fortnight. 

     “I encourage all eligible parents and caregivers to register and make a claim – I want households receiving the money that is available to them. To do so, people simply need to register for FamilyBoost in myIR and submit their early childhood invoices to Inland Revenue.”

     For more information about FamilyBoost, including how to register and claim, visit ird.govt.nz/FamilyBoost 

    MIL OSI New Zealand News –

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Speech to Institute of Public Administration New Zealand

    Source: New Zealand Government

    Good morning, kia ora koutou. 

    Thank you, Liz, for your introduction, and to you all for the opportunity to speak to you today. 

    It’s a pleasure to be here. And it’s a particular pleasure to continue a tradition that was started by one of my predecessors Sir Bill English. I’m told the finance minister has presented this address every year since 2009. 

    I would like to acknowledge the role the institute plays in promoting excellence in the public sector. 

    I also want to take the opportunity to voice my appreciation for the work public servants do to keep New Zealanders safe and ensure people receive the public services on which they depend. 

    I respect your enduring commitment to public service and the integrity with which you approach your work, remaining focused on the New Zealanders we each serve, evolving and adapting as the political tides come and go.

    As a – still – proud Wellingtonian, I have had the pleasure of knowing and working with a broad spectrum of public servants throughout my career. I admire the thoughtfulness, tenacity, and earnestness I have seen in so many of you.

    I am grateful that while our Government is facing into a particularly challenging set of economic circumstances, we do so with wise and experienced public servants at our back and by our side.  

    This is not as easy time for our country.  A sustained cost of living crisis has left New Zealand with highly constrained government finances, recessionary conditions, rising unemployment and a range of new pressures for everyday Kiwis, both in their family and working lives.  

    That’s not a political observation, so much as a statement of reality.  

    Nor is it a reflection on the professionalism, skill or commitment of New Zealand’s public service. 

    The nation’s position today is a consequence of a global pandemic and of choices made by the previous Government.   

    This is not the forum for politics, and it is not my intention to make a political speech. The facts speak for themselves. In the past six years, there has been an 82 per cent increase in government spending and an additional $118 billion of debt added to the government books. As a country we have been living beyond our means. And now, we must correct course. 

    The good news is that there is light at the end of the tunnel. Inflation has returned to the Reserve Bank’s target range of 1 to 3 per cent for the first time in more than three years, interest rates are coming down and business and public confidence is increasing. 

    There is no escaping the reality, however, that many families and businesses are doing it tough. Inflation has increased household costs and squeezed business margins. 

    Partly for that reason, and also because it is good practice, our Government’s focus on fiscal discipline is going to continue. It is not a one-off, one-Budget affair. It is an ongoing state of mind. 

    As a government we are committed to getting the books back in order and bringing debt down, but our aspirations go far beyond changing the colour of the ink in the government’s accounts. We want to do more than simply deliver better value for money. And we are interested in far more than simply ticking off actions or delivering to targets.  

    We are intent on improving lives. 

    You and your colleagues in the public service have a critical role to play in this because, frankly, what we’ve been doing in recent years hasn’t worked for too many New Zealanders. Some of those who most need help haven’t been getting it. 

    That comes at an economic cost to the country, but more importantly it comes at a human cost. People are our greatest asset and delivering for people is our greatest purpose. In recent times, New Zealand has failed too many of its people: both economically and socially. Falling levels of educational achievement, poor housing, rising welfare dependency and an economy that is not growing quickly enough have denied opportunity to those who most need it. 

    I’ve said this a couple of times before to particular groups of public servants. Now, I’ll say it to a broader group. 

    Now is the time for your best and boldest ideas. As a government we are not interested in treading the same path that has denied opportunity to some of our most vulnerable. We want to make a difference to lives. 

    That’s the reason the Government has brought back public service targets: to focus the public sector on driving better results in health, education, law and order, work, housing and the environment. We understand targets aren’t a perfect mechanism, but past experience has shown they do help to focus attention on the things that make a difference.

    It’s also why this Government is determined to scale up the efforts that have gone into social investment so far.  

    The philosophy underlying social investment makes sense to everybody. 

    Given the choice, what New Zealander would choose to pay for an ambulance at the bottom of the cliff when we could instead build a fence to prevent the fall? They key is working out where the fences are needed and for who, ascertaining who is best placed to build those fences, and then rigorously testing whether they’re actually preventing the fall.

    This is a moral imperative, and it’s also a fiscal one.

    The difference to the taxpayer between a life in and out of the prison system and a life spent in productive activity is in excess of a million dollars. More importantly, for the individuals concerned, and their families, it can be the difference between a life of fulfilment and a life of misery. 

    Thanks to the work started by Bill English we now have a very good idea of where to direct our efforts.  

    For example, Stats NZ’s Integrated Data Infrastructure research database enables us to identify common factors in the lives of those who interact most frequently with state agencies. The factors themselves won’t come as a surprise to anyone. They include poor education, benefit dependency, multiple admissions to hospital emergency departments, being victims of violence and being perpetrators of violence. 

    But put the data together and you get a compelling case for targeted intervention. The IDI tells us that a 22-year-old with eight to 10 of these factors is, by the age of 27, 116 times more likely to have a child placed in care, 69 times more likely to have served a prison sentence, 22 times more likely to have been the victim of family violence and five-and-a-half times more likely to have been hospitalised for attempted suicide.       

    The data is not determinative. Many outstanding New Zealanders have emerged from extremely challenging circumstances and some of those who end up falling foul of our justice system and dependent on welfare come from privileged backgrounds. 

    But the data does give us a good sense of where to direct the scarce resources of the government. No country can afford to fund every good thing. Every dollar spent comes at the opportunity cost of a dollar spent elsewhere. We must always be working to focus funds where they can have the most profound and enduring impact. The prize for that effort is the most important prize of all: it is a child fulfilling the full human potential with which they entered this world. 

    There is no shortage of data in government. The challenge we must now address is how we use this this data to practically make a difference to lives.

    Social investment approach

    In July this year, the Government established the Social Investment Agency to lead, build, and demonstrate a social investment approach. 

    As a mark of the importance we attach to this work, the agency was established as a central agency. That is because the Government wants to see system change across the public service.

    To this end we are asking the public service to think about service delivery in a different way. We are asking for more purposeful thought about how we invest for the New Zealanders in most need. Going beyond the easy platitudes of good intentions and instead moving towards a world of far greater accountability for what results are delivered. 

    This demands us to think much more purposefully not just about what we want to change but how best to make it happen. We want to see more devolution of power, more clarity about what works for who, and much more space for innovation. In accountant-speak, our focus is shifting from outputs to outcomes. That means asking ourselves the right questions.

    First: what are the outcomes we want to achieve? That is a different question from the question that is often asked by governments – ‘what can we give people’. And it is a question that leads to different outcomes. 

    Second: who needs help? Not ‘how shall we distribute these services that we already have?’ That means putting the needs of the people who need help ahead of the needs of organisations providing services.

    Third: what services should be prioritised? Not ‘what shall we add to the service mix?’ That means identifying what is working and, just as importantly, what is not working. 

    This is one of the most challenging issues governments face because stopping programmes that are not performing well affects the people involved and can be interpreted as an admission of failure. 

    But, if we are serious about making a difference to the lives of our most vulnerable, we have to be rigorous about directing resources away from initiatives that are not making a difference towards initiatives that are. 

    Fourth: how do we enable providers to achieve the outcomes we want? Not, ‘how do we manage providers so they do what we want’ but how do we empower them to achieve the outcomes we all want to see?

    And fifth and finally: ‘How will we know if what we are doing is working?’ This is a question that is not asked often enough and the failure to do so is at the root of too much inefficiency in our social system.  

    Drawing on evidence and being clear about the answers to these questions, gives us the best chance of changing lives. It also ensures we get value for the money we spend.  

    Social outcomes contracts

    Another important aspect of social investment is recognising that not all the answers to the challenges we face can be found in Wellington office blocks, or the Beehive, for that matter. 

    Communities often know what the best solutions for their people are. We need and want to foster genuine partnership between the public service and proven community-based providers. 

    I’ve heard time and time again from those working with communities that the way the government contracts and commissions programmes is broken.

    I know that you too will have received feedback from service users, non-government organisations, iwi, and communities that current contracting arrangements fail to focus on the thing that really matters – whether the service makes a difference for people.

    When I talk to and visit providers, they tell me about the multiple overlapping contracts that they have with different agencies who do not seem to be talking to each other.

    They tell me about how government ties their hands by requiring specific outputs that prevent them from innovating to provide services more effectively. 

    They tell me about the time they waste producing reports that don’t seem to inform future conversations and contracting decisions, and the teams of people they have to employ to produce reports that aren’t read.

    They tell me about being forced to ‘contract farm’ to secure piecemeal funding across multiple contracts in order to ensure they can stay afloat and serve their communities.

    All of this is a drain on their resources which means they have less time to deliver outcomes for vulnerable New Zealanders. They have less time to think creatively and less ability to adapt and flex how they deliver. 

    Social investment suggests that one of the solutions to these problems is contracting with providers to deliver outcomes rather than outputs. 

    That means that once contracts have been negotiated, providers can choose how best to achieve the outcomes everyone wants. Outcomes-based contracts allow providers to flex their services around the needs of the people they are working with and to develop new solutions. To move away from a focus on serving the needs of a government department and instead take radical accountability for the results they deliver for the people they serve. 

    Outcomes-contracting also creates data-rich feedback loops to inform ongoing improvements to service delivery and future contracts. 

    It requires a conversation and agreement between funders and providers about data. What outcomes will be measured? How will those outcomes be measured? How will providers demonstrate that they are learning what works and doing more of it? How will funders use this data to inform decisions about future investments? 

    It’s not about elaborate evaluations and literature reviews – it’s about real-time insights into what’s working, what’s not working and what to do next to get the result that matter for the people we serve.  

    Changing the way that social services are commissioned will be a critical component of the social investment approach.

    Therefore, I have asked the Social Investment Agency to lead work with other agencies to develop prototype outcomes contracts to replace the current set of criss-crossing and overlapping outputs-focused contracts. This will provide a blueprint for other commissioners and providers of services to follow. 

    Contracting in this way has the potential to raise the bar for investment decisions across the public service. Not only does it require agencies to understand the needs of different groups, it requires them to assess the impact of the services they have delivered by measuring and comparing results.

    The Government is also progressing work to establish a Social Investment Fund that will directly commission outcomes for vulnerable New Zealanders and work with community, non-government organisations and iwi providers. 

    The fund will be managed by the Social Investment Agency and will serve as a testing ground for innovation which – when successful – can be applied more broadly to the social sector.

    Initially the fund will be small and targeted, but I anticipate it will grow over time and become an increasingly important vehicle for empowering innovation and testing new approaches. My ambition is that the fund will eventually be an effective vehicle not just for Government investment in changing people’s lives, but also as a home for funding from philanthropists, investors and anyone who wants to deploy their money in service of social good.  

    Not every initiative it funds will be successful, but that is the point of a testing ground, to identify what works and, just as importantly, what does not. Better to fail fast in a test environment and learn from the results than to keep doing the same thing that history has shown does not deliver results. 

    Conclusion

    In conclusion, this is a government that is intent on making a difference. We are not going to keep doing things simply because that is the way they have always been done. We want to make New Zealand a better place for everyone, particularly our most vulnerable citizens.

    We know change can be unsettling and we know we are asking a lot of you and your colleagues in the public service. 

    At the same time that we’re making savings across the public sector, we’re not just asking you to deliver business as usual, we’re challenging you to think and operate differently. For me, wrestling with that reality conjures up a phrase attributed to that great New Zealand pioneer, Ernest Rutherford: We haven’t got the money, so we’ll have to think.

    I am confident in your ability to rise to the challenge. 

    What I am hearing from many public servants is that you welcome the opportunity to think differently about how we tackle some of our biggest and most entrenched challenges. 

    That does not surprise me. I know the reason most, if not all of you, joined the public service is to serve your fellow New Zealanders and contribute to making New Zealand a better place. 

    I encourage you to be bold and put forward your best advice. I also encourage you to work as closely and openly as you can with those you are seeking to serve – local decision makers, iwi and Māori providers, as well as the private sector. Central government does not have a monopoly on good ideas. 

    Together, we have an opportunity to reduce welfare dependency, improve health, raise educational achievement, lower rates of offending and address increasing rates of inequality. Without adding to the spaghetti of bureaucracy.

    Let’s seize that opportunity with both hands. Thank you.

    MIL OSI New Zealand News –

  • MIL-OSI Security: Florence Man Sentenced to Over 31 Years in Federal Prison for Distributing Pills Containing Fentanyl in Watertown and Sisseton Areas

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    SIOUX FALLS – United States Attorney Alison J. Ramsdell announced today that U.S. District Judge Charles B. Kornmann has sentenced a Florence, South Dakota, man convicted of Conspiracy to Distribute a Controlled Substance. The sentencing took place on October 21, 2024.

    Heath Kelvin Hagen, a/k/a Rem, age 37, was sentenced to 31 years and eight months in federal prison, followed by 10 years of supervised release, and a special assessment to the Federal Crime Victims Fund in the amount of $100.

    Hagen was indicted by a federal grand jury in April of 2023. He was convicted at trial on July 30, 2024.

    The conviction stemmed from Hagen’s involvement in a large fentanyl trafficking organization over the course of the Fall of 2021 into the Spring of 2022. Hagen knowingly and intentionally conspired with others to distribute 400 grams of a substance containing fentanyl, a Schedule II controlled substance. Hagen obtained pills containing fentanyl from a co-conspirator in Minneapolis. Hagen then re-sold the pills to sub-distributors and drug customers in Watertown and Sisseton. Following a search of Hagen’s residence, investigators recovered 60 fentanyl pills hidden in a fake tea can. Investigators determined Hagen was involved in the distribution of over 20,000 pills containing fentanyl.

    “This defendant was repeatedly identified as the biggest fentanyl dealer in the Watertown area, responsible for peddling thousands of lethal doses of fentanyl into our communities,” said U.S. Attorney Alison J. Ramsdell. “His sentence of over thirty-one years not only reflects the seriousness of his crime, but the relentless, collaborative efforts of local, state, and federal law enforcement agencies to identify and investigate drug traffickers so that my office can prosecute and put away reckless criminals looking to profit off vulnerable and unsuspecting South Dakotans.”

    This case was investigated by the Bureau of Indian Affairs and the South Dakota Division of Criminal Investigation. Assistant U.S. Attorney Mark Hodges prosecuted the case.

    Hagen was immediately remanded to the custody of the U.S. Marshals Service. 

    MIL Security OSI –

  • MIL-OSI: Northfield Bancorp, Inc. Announces Third Quarter 2024 Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    NOTABLE ITEMS FOR THE QUARTER INCLUDE:

    • DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE WERE $0.16 FOR THE CURRENT QUARTER COMPARED TO $0.14 FOR THE TRAILING QUARTER, AND $0.19 FOR THE THIRD QUARTER OF 2023.
    • NET INTEREST MARGIN REMAINED RELATIVELY STABLE AT 2.08% FOR THE CURRENT QUARTER AS COMPARED TO 2.09% FOR THE TRAILING QUARTER.
    • AVERAGE YIELD ON INTEREST-EARNING ASSETS DECREASED ONE BASIS POINT TO 4.38%, WHILE THE AVERAGE COST OF INTEREST-BEARING LIABILITIES REMAINED STABLE AT 2.95% FOR THE CURRENT QUARTER AS COMPARED TO THE TRAILING QUARTER.
    • DEPOSITS (EXCLUDING BROKERED) DECREASED MODESTLY BY $5.1 MILLION, OR LESS THAN 1% ANNUALIZED, COMPARED TO JUNE 30, 2024, AND INCREASED $15.0 MILLION, OR 0.5% ANNUALIZED, FROM DECEMBER 31, 2023. COST OF DEPOSITS AT SEPTEMBER 30, 2024 WAS 2.07% AS COMPARED TO 2.10% AT JUNE 30, 2024.
    • LOAN BALANCES DECLINED BY $27.2 MILLION, OR 2.7% ANNUALIZED, FROM JUNE 30, 2024, WITH DECREASES IN COMMERCIAL, MULTIFAMILY AND RESIDENTIAL REAL ESTATE LOANS OFFSET BY INCREASES IN HOME EQUITY, CONSTRUCTION AND LAND, AND COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL LOANS.
    • ASSET QUALITY REMAINS STRONG DESPITE AN INCREASE IN NON-PERFORMING LOANS IN THE CURRENT QUARTER. NON-PERFORMING LOANS TO TOTAL LOANS WAS 0.75% AT SEPTEMBER 30, 2024 AND 0.42% AT JUNE 30, 2024.
    • THE COMPANY MAINTAINED STRONG LIQUIDITY WITH APPROXIMATELY $597 MILLION IN UNPLEDGED AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE SECURITIES AND LOANS READILY AVAILABLE-FOR-PLEDGE OF APPROXIMATELY $699 MILLION.
    • THE COMPANY REPURCHASED 560,683 SHARES FOR A COST OF $6.3 MILLION. THERE IS NO REMAINING CAPACITY UNDER THE CURRENT REPURCHASE PROGRAM.
    • CASH DIVIDEND DECLARED OF $0.13 PER SHARE OF COMMON STOCK, PAYABLE ON NOVEMBER 20, 2024, TO STOCKHOLDERS OF RECORD AS OF NOVEMBER 6, 2024.

    WOODBRIDGE, N.J., Oct. 23, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — NORTHFIELD BANCORP, INC. (Nasdaq:NFBK) (the “Company”), the holding company for Northfield Bank, reported net income of $6.5 million, or $0.16 per diluted share for the three months ended September 30, 2024, compared to $6.0 million, or $0.14 per diluted share, for the three months ended June 30, 2024, and $8.2 million, or $0.19 per diluted share, for the three months ended September 30, 2023. For the nine months ended September 30, 2024, net income totaled $18.7 million, or $0.45 per diluted share, compared to $29.4 million, or $0.67 per diluted share, for the nine months ended September 30, 2023. For the nine months ended September 30, 2024, net income reflected $795,000, or $0.02 per share, of additional tax expense related to options that expired in June 2024, and $683,000, or $0.01 per share, of severance expense related to staffing realignments. For the nine months ended September 30, 2023, net income reflected $440,000, or $0.01 per share of severance expense. The decrease in net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2024, compared to the comparable prior year period was primarily the result of a decrease in net interest income, which was negatively impacted by higher funding costs, partially offset by improved interest and non-interest income.

    Commenting on the quarter, Steven M. Klein, the Company’s Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer stated, “In the third quarter, the Northfield team continued to focus on financial performance, serving the businesses and consumers in our marketplace, and improving upon our operating efficiencies.” Mr. Klein continued, “We delivered solid financial performance for the quarter, increasing our net income, and earnings per share, as we manage our strong capital levels, core deposit and loan relationships, asset quality, and operating expenses. While significant risks remain, the decrease in short-term market interest rates late in the third quarter should provide increased economic activity in our marketplace and opportunities for our Company.”

    Mr. Klein further noted, “I am pleased to announce that the Board of Directors has declared a cash dividend of $0.13 per common share, payable on November 20, 2024 to stockholders of record on November 6, 2024.”

    Results of Operations

    Comparison of Operating Results for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2024 and 2023

    Net income was $18.7 million and $29.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2024 and September 30, 2023, respectively. Significant variances from the comparable prior year period are as follows: a $10.9 million decrease in net interest income, a $1.3 million increase in the provision for credit losses on loans, a $1.5 million increase in non-interest income, a $3.2 million increase in non-interest expense, and a $3.1 million decrease in income tax expense.

    Net interest income for the nine months ended September 30, 2024, decreased $10.9 million, or 11.4%, to $84.8 million, from $95.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2023 due to a $34.8 million increase in interest expense, which was partially offset by a $23.9 million increase in interest income. The increase in interest expense was largely driven by the cost of interest-bearing liabilities, which increased by 96 basis points to 2.93% for the nine months ended September 30, 2024, from 1.97% for the nine months ended September 30, 2023, driven primarily by a 114 basis point increase in the cost of interest-bearing deposits from 1.42% to 2.56% for the nine months ended September 30, 2024, and a 31 basis point increase in the cost of borrowings from 3.58% to 3.89% due to rising market interest rates and a shift in the composition of the deposit portfolio towards higher-costing certificates of deposit and a greater reliance on borrowings. The increase in interest expense was also due to a $277.1 million, or 7.0%, increase in the average balance of interest-bearing liabilities, including an increase of $149.8 million in the average balance of borrowed funds and a $127.1 million increase in average interest-bearing deposits. The increase in interest income was primarily due to a $156.1 million, or 2.9%, increase in the average balance of interest-earning assets coupled with a 47 basis point increase in the yield on interest-earning assets, which increased to 4.35% for the nine months ended September 30, 2024, from 3.88% for the nine months ended September 30, 2023, due to the rising rate environment. The increase in the average balance of interest-earning assets was primarily due to increases in the average balance of interest-earning deposits in financial institutions of $111.7 million, the average balance of other securities of $91.6 million, and the average balance of mortgage-backed securities of $88.5 million, partially offset by a decrease in the average balance of loans of $133.4 million.

    Net interest margin decreased by 34 basis points to 2.07% for the nine months ended September 30, 2024, from 2.41% for the nine months ended September 30, 2023. The decrease in net interest margin was primarily due to interest-bearing liabilities repricing at a faster rate than interest-earning assets. The net interest margin was negatively affected by approximately 12 basis points due to a $300 million low risk leverage strategy implemented in the first quarter of 2024. In January 2024, the Company borrowed $300.0 million from the Federal Reserve Bank through the Bank Term Funding Program at favorable terms and conditions and invested the proceeds in interest-bearing deposits in other financial institutions and investment securities. The Company accreted interest income related to purchased credit-deteriorated (“PCD”) loans of $1.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2024, as compared to $1.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2023. Net interest income for the nine months ended September 30, 2024, included loan prepayment income of $648,000 as compared to $1.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2023.

    The provision for credit losses on loans increased by $1.3 million to $2.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2024, compared to $1.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2023, primarily due to an increase in the specific reserve component of the allowance for credit losses, which was partially offset by a decrease in the general reserve component of the allowance for credit losses. The increase in the specific reserve was related to a single commercial and industrial relationship totaling $12.5 million that experienced credit deterioration and was placed on non-accrual during the current quarter, which has a specific reserve of $1.3 million and incurred a charge-off of $878,000. The decline in the general reserve component of the allowance for credit losses resulted from a decline in loan balances and an improvement in the macroeconomic forecast for the current period within our Current Expected Credit Loss (“CECL”) model, partially offset by an increase in reserves related to changes in model assumptions, including the slowing of prepayment speeds, and an increase in reserves in the commercial and industrial and home equity and lines of credit portfolios related to an increase in non-performing loans in these portfolios and higher loan balances. Net charge-offs were $4.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2024, primarily due to $3.9 million in net charge-offs on small business unsecured commercial and industrial loans, as compared to net charge-offs of $5.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2023. Management continues to closely monitor the small business unsecured commercial and industrial loan portfolio, which totaled $31.0 million at September 30, 2024.

    Non-interest income increased by $1.5 million, or 18.7%, to $9.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2024, compared to $8.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2023. The increase was primarily due to increases of $790,000 in fees and service charges for customer services, related to an increase in overdraft fees and service charges on deposit accounts, $260,000 in income on bank owned life insurance, and $874,000 in gains on trading securities, net. Partially offsetting the increases was a $303,000 decrease in other income, primarily due to lower swap fee income. Gains on trading securities in the nine months ended September 30, 2024, were $1.6 million, as compared to $723,000 in the nine months ended September 30, 2023. The trading portfolio is utilized to fund the Company’s deferred compensation obligation to certain employees and directors of the plan. The participants of this plan, at their election, defer a portion of their compensation. Gains and losses on trading securities have no effect on net income since participants benefit from, and bear the full risk of changes in the trading securities market values. Therefore, the Company records an equal and offsetting amount in compensation expense, reflecting the change in the Company’s obligations under the plan.

    Non-interest expense increased $3.2 million, or 5.2%, to $65.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2024, compared to $62.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2023. The increase was primarily due to a $3.3 million increase in employee compensation and benefits, primarily attributable to higher salary expense, related to annual merit increases and higher medical expense, and an increase of $874,000 in deferred compensation expense, which is described above, and had no effect on net income. Employee compensation and benefits expense also includes severance expense of $683,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2024, as compared to $440,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2023. During the second quarter of 2024, due to current economic conditions, the Company implemented a workforce reduction plan which included modest layoffs and staffing realignments. The annual estimated cost savings of this plan is $2.0 million, pre-tax. Partially offsetting the increase was a $461,000 decrease in stock compensation expense related to performance stock awards not expected to vest. Additionally, non-interest expense included a $727,000 increase in credit loss expense/(benefit) for off-balance sheet exposure due to a provision of $337,000 recorded during the nine months ended September 30, 2024, as compared to a benefit of $390,000 for the comparative prior year period. The benefit in the prior year period was attributable to a decrease in the pipeline of loans committed and awaiting closing. Partially offsetting the increases was a $552,000 decrease in advertising expense due to a change in marketing strategy and the timing of specific deposit and lending campaigns.

    The Company recorded income tax expense of $7.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2024, compared to $11.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2023, with the decrease due to lower taxable income partially offset by a higher effective tax rate. The effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2024, was 29.7% compared to 27.2% for the nine months ended September 30, 2023. In June 2024, options granted in 2014 expired and resulted in additional tax expense of $795,000, contributing to the higher effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2024.

    Comparison of Operating Results for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2024 and 2023

    Net income was $6.5 million and $8.2 million for the quarters ended September 30, 2024 and September 30, 2023, respectively. Significant variances from the comparable prior year quarter are as follows: a $1.5 million decrease in net interest income, a $2.4 increase in the provision for credit losses on loans, a $1.5 million increase in non-interest income, a $189,000 decrease in non-interest expense, and a $513,000 decrease in income tax expense.

    Net interest income for the quarter ended September 30, 2024, decreased $1.5 million, or 4.9%, to $28.2 million, from $29.7 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2023, due to an $8.0 million increase in interest expense, partially offset by an $6.6 million increase in interest income. The increase in interest expense was largely driven by the impact of rising market interest rates and a $227.0 million, or 5.7%, increase in the average balance of interest-bearing liabilities, including increases of $158.4 million and $68.4 million in the average balance of interest-bearing deposits and borrowed funds, respectively. The increase in interest income was primarily due to a $155.1 million, or 3.0%, increase in the average balance of interest-earning assets coupled with a 38 basis point increase in yields on interest-earning assets due to the rising rate environment. The increase in the average balance of interest-earning assets was due to increases in the average balance of mortgage-backed securities of $240.3 million, the average balance of other securities of $64.0 million, and the average balance of interest-earning deposits in financial institutions of $26.8 million, partially offset by decreases in the average balance of loans outstanding of $172.8 million and the average balance of Federal Home Loan Bank of New York stock of $3.2 million.

    Net interest margin decreased by 17 basis points to 2.08% for the quarter ended September 30, 2024, from 2.25% for the quarter ended September 30, 2023, primarily due to the cost of interest-bearing liabilities increasing faster than the repricing of interest-earning assets. The cost of interest-bearing liabilities increased by 64 basis points to 2.95% for the quarter ended September 30, 2024, from 2.31% for the quarter ended September 30, 2023, driven primarily by a 77 basis point increase in the cost of interest-bearing deposits from 1.82% to 2.59%, and a 30 basis point increase in the cost of borrowings from 3.63% to 3.93%. The increase in the cost of interest-bearing liabilities was partially offset by an increase in the yield on interest-earning assets, which increased by 38 basis points to 4.38% for the quarter ended September 30, 2024, from 4.00% for the quarter ended September 30, 2023. Net interest income for the quarter ended September 30, 2024, included loan prepayment income of $87,000, as compared to $183,000 for the quarter ended September 30, 2023. The Company accreted interest income related to PCD loans of $327,000 for the quarter ended September 30, 2024, as compared to $325,000 for the quarter ended September 30, 2023.

    The provision for credit losses on loans increased by $2.4 million to $2.5 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2024, from a provision of $188,000 for the quarter ended September 30, 2023, primarily due to an increase in the specific reserve component of the allowance for credit losses, which was partially offset by a decrease in the general reserve component of the allowance for credit losses. The increase in the specific reserve was related to a single commercial and industrial relationship that experienced credit deterioration and was placed on non-accrual during the current quarter, which has a specific reserve of $1.3 million and incurred a charge-off of $878,000. The decline in the general reserve component of the allowance for credit losses resulted from a decline in loan balances and an improvement in the macroeconomic forecast for the current period within our CECL model, partially offset by an increase in reserves related to changes in model assumptions, including the slowing of prepayment speeds, and an increase in reserves in the commercial and industrial portfolio related to an increase in non-performing loans and higher loan balances. Net charge-offs were $2.1 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2024, and included $1.4 million in net charge-offs on small business unsecured loans, as compared to net charge-offs of $2.9 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2023.

    Non-interest income increased by $1.5 million, or 68.7%, to $3.6 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2024, from $2.1 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2023, primarily due to a $294,000 increase in fees and service charges, primarily related to higher overdraft fees, a $1.0 million increase in gains on trading securities, net, and a $185,000 increase in other income, primarily due to higher swap fee income. For the quarter ended September 30, 2024, gains on trading securities, net, were $710,000, compared to losses of $295,000 in the quarter ended September 30, 2023. Gains and losses on trading securities have no effect on net income since participants benefit from, and bear the full risk of, changes in the trading securities market values. Therefore, the Company records an equal and offsetting amount in compensation expense, reflecting the change in the Company’s obligations under the Plan.

    Non-interest expense decreased by $189,000, or 0.9%, to $20.4 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2024, from $20.6 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2023. The decrease was primarily due to decreases of $386,000 in occupancy expense, attributable to lower real estate taxes, common area maintenance and electricity costs, $214,000 in data processing costs, attributable to a decrease in ongoing core processing costs related to a prior technology-related contract renewed at favorable terms, and $132,000 in advertising expense. Partially offsetting the decreases was a $504,000 increase in compensation and employee benefits, which included a $1.0 million increase in expense related to the Company’s deferred compensation plan which is described above, and had no effect on net income, that was offset by lower medical expense.

    The Company recorded income tax expense of $2.4 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2024, compared to $2.9 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2023, with the decrease due to lower taxable income. The effective tax rate for the quarter ended September 30, 2024 was 26.6%, compared to 26.0% for the quarter ended September 30, 2023.

    Comparison of Operating Results for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2024 and June 30, 2024

    Net income was $6.5 million and $6.0 million for the quarters ended September 30, 2024, and June 30, 2024, respectively. Significant variances from the prior quarter are as follows: an $458,000 decrease in net interest income, a $3.2 million increase in the provision for credit losses on loans, a $719,000 increase in non-interest income, a $2.6 million decrease in non-interest expense, and an $850,000 decrease in income tax expense.

    Net interest income for the quarter ended September 30, 2024, decreased by $458,000, or 1.6%, primarily due to a $902,000 decrease in interest income, partially offset by a $444,000 decrease in interest expense on deposits and borrowings. The decrease in interest income was primarily due to a $124.4 million decrease in the average balance of interest-earning assets. The decrease in the average balance of interest-earning assets was primarily due to decreases in the average balance of interest-earning deposits in financial institutions of $91.6 million, the average balance of other securities of $60.5 million, and the average balance of loans outstanding of $48.1 million, partially offset by an increase in the average balance of mortgage-backed securities of $76.5 million. The decrease in interest expense on deposits and borrowings was primarily due to a $105.8 million, or 2.5%, decrease in the average balance of interest-bearing liabilities attributable to a $73.2 million decrease in the average balance of interest-bearing deposits and a $32.7 million decrease in the average balance of borrowed funds.

    Net interest margin decreased by one basis point to 2.08% from 2.09% for the quarter ended June 30, 2024, primarily due to a one basis point decrease in yields on interest-earning assets whereas the cost of interest-bearing liabilities remained level. Net interest income for the quarter ended September 30, 2024, included loan prepayment income of $87,000 as compared to $210,000 for the quarter ended June 30, 2024. The Company accreted interest income related to PCD loans of $327,000 for the quarter ended September 30, 2024, as compared to $321,000 for the quarter ended June 30, 2024.

    The provision for credit losses on loans increased by $3.2 million to $2.5 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2024, from a benefit of $618,000 for the quarter ended June 30, 2024. The increase in the provision for the current quarter was primarily due to an increase in the specific reserve component of the allowance for credit losses, attributable to a single commercial and industrial relationship that experienced credit deterioration and was placed on non-accrual during the current quarter, higher reserves related to changes in model assumptions during the current quarter, including the slowing of prepayment speeds and higher net-charge-offs. Net charge-offs were $2.1 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2024, as compared to net charge-offs of $1.6 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2024.

    Non-interest income increased by $719,000, or 25.1%, to $3.6 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2024, from $2.9 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2024. The increase was primarily due to a $522,000 increase in gains on sales of trading securities, net, and a $192,000 increase in other income, primarily due to higher swap fee income. For the quarter ended September 30, 2024, gains on trading securities, net, were $710,000, compared to gains of $188,000 for the quarter ended June 30, 2024.

    Non-interest expense decreased by $2.6 million, or 11.4%, to $20.4 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2024, from $23.0 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2024. The decrease was primarily due to a $2.0 million decrease in compensation and employee benefits, primarily attributable to a decrease in salaries and medical expense due to lower employee headcount, partially offset by a $522,000 increase in expense related to the Company’s deferred compensation plan which had no effect on net income. Also contributing to the decrease were decreases of $192,000 in occupancy expense, $397,000 in data processing costs, attributable to a decrease in ongoing core processing costs resulting from a prior technology-related contract renewed at favorable terms, $200,000 in advertising expense, and $122,000 in other non-interest expense. Partially offsetting the decreases was a $262,000 increase in professional fees, primarily due to an increase in outsourced audit services.

    The Company recorded income tax expense of $2.4 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2024, compared to $3.2 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2024. The effective tax rate for the quarter ended September 30, 2024 was 26.6%, compared to 35.0% for the quarter ended June 30, 2024. During the quarter ended June 30, 2024, options granted in 2014 expired and resulted in additional tax expense of $795,000, contributing to the higher effective tax rate for the quarter ended June 30, 2024.

    Financial Condition

    Total assets increased by $132.5 million, or 2.4%, to $5.73 billion at September 30, 2024, from $5.60 billion at December 31, 2023. The increase was primarily due to increases in available-for-sale debt securities of $268.0 million, or 33.7%, and cash and cash equivalents of $3.4 million, or 1.5%, partially offset by a decrease in loans receivable of $139.7 million, or 3.3%.

    Cash and cash equivalents increased by $3.4 million, or 1.5%, to $232.9 million at September 30, 2024, from $229.5 million at December 31, 2023. Balances fluctuate based on the timing of receipt of security and loan repayments and the redeployment of cash into higher-yielding assets such as loans and securities, or the funding of deposit outflows or borrowing maturities.

    Loans held-for-investment, net, decreased by $139.7 million, or 3.3%, to $4.06 billion at September 30, 2024 from $4.20 billion at December 31, 2023, primarily due to decreases in multifamily, commercial and one-to-four family residential real estate loans, partially offset by increases in home equity and lines of credit, construction and land, and commercial and industrial loans. The decrease in loan balances reflects the Company remaining strategically focused on both managing the concentration of its commercial and multifamily real estate loan portfolios and disciplined loan pricing, as well as lower customer demand in the recent elevated interest rate environment. Multifamily loans decreased $110.1 million, or 4.0%, to $2.64 billion at September 30, 2024 from $2.75 billion at December 31, 2023, commercial real estate loans decreased $51.4 million, or 5.5%, to $878.2 million at September 30, 2024 from $929.6 million at December 31, 2023, one-to-four family residential loans decreased $11.1 million, or 6.9%, to $149.7 million at September 30, 2024 from $160.8 million at December 31, 2023, and other loans decreased $925,000, or 35.8%, to $1.7 million at September 30, 2024 from $2.6 million at December 31, 2023. Partially offsetting these decreases were increases in commercial and industrial loans of $19.1 million, or 12.3%, to $174.4 million at September 30, 2024 from $155.3 million at December 31, 2023, home equity and lines of credit of $8.4 million, or 5.2%, to $171.9 million at September 30, 2024 from $163.5 million at December 31, 2023, and construction and land loans of $2.1 million, or 6.6%, to $33.0 million at September 30, 2024 from $31.0 million at December 31, 2023.

    As of September 30, 2024, non-owner occupied commercial real estate loans (as defined by regulatory guidance) to total risk-based capital was estimated at approximately 447%. Management believes that Northfield Bank (the “Bank”) maintains appropriate risk management practices including risk assessments, board-approved underwriting policies and related procedures, which include monitoring Bank portfolio performance, performing market analysis (economic and real estate), and stressing of the Bank’s commercial real estate portfolio under severe, adverse economic conditions. Although management believes the Bank has implemented appropriate policies and procedures to manage its commercial real estate concentration risk, the Bank’s regulators could require it to implement additional policies and procedures or could require it to maintain higher levels of regulatory capital, which might adversely affect its loan originations, the Company’s ability to pay dividends, and overall profitability.

    Our real estate portfolio includes credit risk exposure to loans collateralized by office buildings and multifamily properties in New York State subject to some form of rent regulation limiting rent increases for rent stabilized multifamily properties. At September 30, 2024, office-related loans represented $183.6 million, or 4.5% of our total loan portfolio, with an average balance of $1.7 million (although we have originated these type of loans in amounts substantially greater than this average) and a weighted average loan-to-value ratio of 59%. Approximately 41% were owner-occupied. The geographic locations of the properties collateralizing our office-related loans are: 50.7% in New York, 47.8% in New Jersey and 1.5% in Pennsylvania. At September 30, 2024, our largest office-related loan had a principal balance of $90.0 million (with a net active principal balance for the Bank of $29.9 million as we have a 33.3% participation interest), was secured by an office facility located in Staten Island, New York, and was performing in accordance with its original contractual terms. At September 30, 2024, multifamily loans that have some form of rent stabilization or rent control totaled approximately $447.5 million, or approximately 11% of our total loan portfolio, with an average balance of $1.7 million (although we have originated these type of loans in amounts substantially greater than this average) and a weighted average loan-to-value ratio of 51%. At September 30, 2024, our largest rent-regulated loan had a principal balance of $16.9 million, was secured by an apartment building located in Staten Island, New York, and was performing in accordance with its original contractual terms. Management continues to closely monitor its office and rent-regulated portfolios. For further details on our rent-regulated multifamily portfolio see “Asset Quality”.

    PCD loans totaled $9.3 million and $9.9 million at September 30, 2024 and December 31, 2023, respectively. The majority of the remaining PCD loan balance consists of loans acquired as part of a Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation-assisted transaction. The Company accreted interest income of $327,000 and $1.1 million attributable to PCD loans for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024, respectively, as compared to $325,000 and $1.0 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2023, respectively. PCD loans had an allowance for credit losses of approximately $2.9 million at September 30, 2024.

    Loan balances are summarized as follows (dollars in thousands):

      September 30, 2024   June 30, 2024   December 31, 2023
    Real estate loans:          
    Multifamily $         2,640,944     $         2,665,202     $         2,750,996  
    Commercial mortgage           878,173               896,157               929,595  
    One-to-four family residential mortgage           149,682               151,948               160,824  
    Home equity and lines of credit           171,946               167,852               163,520  
    Construction and land           33,024               32,607               30,967  
    Total real estate loans           3,873,769               3,913,766               4,035,902  
    Commercial and industrial loans           174,253               165,586               154,984  
    PPP loans           160               202               284  
    Other loans           1,660               2,322               2,585  
    Total commercial and industrial, PPP, and other loans           176,073               168,110               157,853  
    Loans held-for-investment, net (excluding PCD)           4,049,842               4,081,876               4,193,755  
    PCD loans           9,264               9,344               9,899  
    Total loans held-for-investment, net $         4,059,106     $         4,091,220     $         4,203,654  

    The Company’s available-for-sale debt securities portfolio increased by $268.0 million, or 33.7%, to $1.06 billion at September 30, 2024, from $795.5 million at December 31, 2023. The increase was primarily attributable to purchases of securities, partially offset by paydowns, maturities and calls. At September 30, 2024, $869.4 million of the portfolio consisted of residential mortgage-backed securities issued or guaranteed by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, or Ginnie Mae. In addition, the Company held $74.9 million in U.S. Government agency securities, $118.5 million in corporate bonds, substantially all of which were investment grade, and $684,000 in municipal bonds at September 30, 2024. Unrealized losses, net of tax, on available-for-sale debt securities and held-to-maturity securities approximated $19.6 million and $219,000, respectively, at September 30, 2024, and $32.5 million and $279,000, respectively, at December 31, 2023.

    Equity securities were $10.7 million at September 30, 2024 and $10.6 million at December 31, 2023. Equity securities are primarily comprised of an investment in a Small Business Administration Loan Fund. This investment is utilized by the Bank as part of its Community Reinvestment Act program.

    Total liabilities increased $132.3 million, or 2.7%, to $5.03 billion at September 30, 2024, from $4.90 billion at December 31, 2023. The increase was primarily attributable to an increase in borrowings of $131.6 million, partially offset by a decrease in total deposits of $2.9 million. The Company routinely utilizes brokered deposits and borrowed funds to manage interest rate risk, the cost of interest-bearing liabilities, and funding needs related to loan originations and deposit activity.

    Deposits decreased $2.9 million, or 0.1%, to $3.88 billion at September 30, 2024 as compared to December 31, 2023. Brokered deposits decreased by $17.9 million, or 17.9%, due to maturities that were replaced by borrowings. Deposits, excluding brokered deposits, increased $15.0 million, or 0.4%. The increase in deposits, excluding brokered deposits, was primarily attributable to increases of $80.9 million in time deposits, partially offset by decreases of $14.9 million in transaction accounts, $14.7 million in savings accounts, and $36.3 million in money market accounts. Growth in time deposits was attributable to the current interest rate environment and offering competitive interest rates to attract deposits. Estimated gross uninsured deposits at September 30, 2024 were $1.71 billion. This total includes fully collateralized uninsured governmental deposits and intercompany deposits of $859.3 million, leaving estimated uninsured deposits of approximately $852.2 million, or 22.0%, of total deposits. At December 31, 2023, estimated uninsured deposits totaled $869.9 million, or 22.4% of total deposits.

    Deposit account balances are summarized as follows (dollars in thousands):

      September 30, 2024   June 30, 2024   December 31, 2023
    Transaction:          
    Non-interest bearing checking $         681,741     $         685,574     $         694,903  
    Negotiable orders of withdrawal and interest-bearing checking           1,230,176               1,251,342               1,231,943  
    Total transaction           1,911,917               1,936,916               1,926,846  
    Savings and money market:          
    Savings           911,067               916,598               925,744  
    Money market           265,800               255,550               302,122  
    Brokered money market           —               —               50,000  
    Total savings           1,176,867               1,172,148               1,277,866  
    Certificates of deposit:          
    $250,000 and under           585,606               568,809               525,454  
    Over $250,000           119,033               120,601               98,269  
    Brokered           82,146               —               50,000  
    Total certificates of deposit           786,785               689,410               673,723  
    Total deposits $         3,875,569     $         3,798,474     $         3,878,435  

    Included in the table above are business and municipal deposit account balances as follows (dollars in thousands):

      September 30, 2024   June 30, 2024   December 31, 2023
               
    Business customers $         869,990     $         866,403     $         893,296  
    Municipal (governmental) customers $         799,249     $         815,086     $         768,556  

    Borrowed funds increased to $1.05 billion at September 30, 2024, from $920.5 million at December 31, 2023. The increase in borrowings for the period was primarily due to a $205.5 million increase in borrowings under the Federal Reserve Bank Term Funding Program, which included favorable terms and conditions as compared to FHLB advances. Management utilizes borrowings to mitigate interest rate risk, for short-term liquidity, and to a lesser extent from time to time, as part of leverage strategies.

    The following table sets forth borrowing maturities (excluding overnight borrowings and subordinated debt) and the weighted average rate by year at September 30, 2024 (dollars in thousands):

    Year   Amount (1)   Weighted Average Rate
    2024   $25,000   4.71%
    2025   483,184   4.00%
    2026   148,000   4.36%
    2027   173,000   3.19%
    2028   154,288   3.96%
        $983,472   3.92%
             
    __________________________________________________
    (1) Borrowings maturing in 2025 include $300.0 million of FRB borrowings that can be repaid without any penalty.

    Total stockholders’ equity increased by $119,000 to $699.6 million at September 30, 2024, from $699.4 million at December 31, 2023. The increase was attributable to net income of $18.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2024, a $14.1 million increase in accumulated other comprehensive income, associated with an increase in the estimated fair value of our debt securities available-for-sale portfolio due to the increase in market interest rates, and a $1.9 million increase in equity award activity, partially offset by $18.1 million in stock repurchases and $16.5 million in dividend payments. On April 24, 2024, the Board of Directors of the Company approved a $5.0 million stock repurchase program, which was completed in May 2024, and on June 14, 2024, the Board of Directors of the Company approved a $10.0 million stock repurchase program. During the nine months ended September 30, 2024, the Company repurchased 1.8 million of its common stock outstanding at an average price of $10.03 for a total of $18.1 million pursuant to the approved stock repurchase programs. As of September 30, 2024, the Company had no remaining capacity under its current repurchase program.

    The Company’s most liquid assets are cash and cash equivalents, corporate bonds, and unpledged mortgage-related securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. Government, Fannie Mae, or Freddie Mac, that we can either borrow against or sell. We also have the ability to surrender bank-owned life insurance contracts. The surrender of these contracts would subject the Company to income taxes and penalties for increases in the cash surrender values over the original premium payments. We also have the ability to obtain additional funding from the FHLB and Federal Reserve Bank of New York utilizing unencumbered and unpledged securities and multifamily loans. The Company expects to have sufficient funds available to meet current commitments in the normal course of business. The Company’s on-hand liquidity ratio as of September 30, 2024 was 16.4%.

    The Company had the following primary sources of liquidity at September 30, 2024 (dollars in thousands): 

    Cash and cash equivalents(1) $ 218,733
    Corporate bonds(2) $ 104,633
    Multifamily loans(2) $ 699,343
    Mortgage-backed securities (issued or guaranteed by the U.S. Government, Fannie Mae, or Freddie Mac)(2) $ 491,985
       
    __________________________________________________
    (1) Excludes $14.2 million of cash at Northfield Bank.
    (2) Represents estimated remaining borrowing potential.

    The Company and the Bank utilize the Community Bank Leverage Ratio (“CBLR”) framework. The CBLR replaces the risk-based and leverage capital requirements in the generally applicable capital rules. At September 30, 2024, the Company and the Bank’s estimated CBLR ratios were 12.03% and 12.26%, respectively, which exceeded the minimum requirement to be considered well-capitalized of 9%.

    Asset Quality

    The following table details total non-accrual loans (excluding PCD), non-performing assets, loans over 90 days delinquent on which interest is accruing, and accruing loans 30 to 89 days delinquent at September 30, 2024, June 30, 2024, and December 31, 2023 (dollars in thousands):

      September 30, 2024   June 30, 2024   December 31, 2023
    Non-accrual loans:          
    Held-for-investment          
    Real estate loans:          
    Multifamily $         2,651       $         2,691       $         2,709    
    Commercial           8,823                 10,244                 6,491    
    One-to-four family residential           66                 69                 104    
    Home equity and lines of credit           1,123                 1,124                 499    
    Commercial and industrial           15,117                 2,570                 305    
    Other           6                 6                 7    
    Total non-accrual loans           27,786                 16,704                 10,115    
    Loans delinquent 90 days or more and still accruing:          
    Held-for-investment          
    Real estate loans:          
    Multifamily           —                 —                 201    
    Commercial           1,161                 —                 —    
    One-to-four family residential           304                 136                 406    
    Home equity and lines of credit           343                 467                 711    
    Commercial and industrial           835                 —                 —    
    Total loans held-for-investment delinquent 90 days or more and still accruing           2,643                 603                 1,318    
    Total non-performing loans/assets $         30,429       $         17,307       $         11,433    
    Non-performing loans to total loans           0.75   %             0.42   %             0.27   %
    Non-performing assets to total assets           0.53   %             0.30   %             0.20   %
    Accruing loans 30 to 89 days delinquent $         16,057       $         6,265       $         8,683    

    The Company’s non-performing loans at September 30, 2024 totaled $30.4 million, or 0.75%, of total loans as compared to $11.4 million, or 0.27%, at December 31, 2023. The $19.0 million increase in non-performing loans was primarily attributable to an increase in non-performing commercial and industrial loans of $15.6 million and an increase of $3.5 million in non-performing commercial real estate loans. One commercial and industrial relationship with an outstanding balance of $12.5 million at September 30, 2024, experienced credit deterioration and was placed on non-accrual status during the third quarter of 2024. The loan is currently in the process of being restructured and we expect to receive a partial payment of $10.0 million on or before October 31, 2024, with the remaining $2.5 million to be repaid over three years. The loan was individually evaluated for impairment, we charged off $878,000 and provided a specific reserve of $1.3 million. Additionally, management evaluated the collateral from the Company and assets subject to personal guarantees and, based on current estimates, believes there is adequate collateral and assets to support the current value of the loan absent the expected repayment of $10.0 million. Another commercial and industrial relationship with an outstanding balance of $750,000 is in the process of maturity extension. Additionally, there was an increase in non-performing unsecured small business loans. Unsecured small business loans totaled $31.0 million and $37.4 million at September 30, 2024 and December 31, 2023, respectively. Management continues to closely monitor the small business unsecured commercial and industrial loan portfolio.

    The increase in non-performing commercial real estate loans was primarily attributable to one loan with a balance of $4.4 million, which was put on non-accrual status during the first quarter of 2024. Based on the results of the impairment analysis for this loan, no impairment reserve was necessary as the loan is adequately covered by collateral (a private residence and retail property, both located in New Jersey), with aggregate appraised values totaling $8.7 million.

    Accruing Loans 30 to 89 Days Delinquent

    Loans 30 to 89 days delinquent and on accrual status totaled $16.1 million, $6.3 million and $8.7 million at September 30, 2024, June 30, 2024, and December 31, 2023, respectively. The following table sets forth delinquencies for accruing loans by type and by amount at September 30, 2024, June 30, 2024, and December 31, 2023 (dollars in thousands):
      

      September 30, 2024   June 30, 2024   December 31, 2023
    Held-for-investment          
    Real estate loans:          
    Multifamily $         2,259     $         168     $         740  
    Commercial           5,689               1,557               1,010  
    One-to-four family residential           2,286               1,769               3,339  
    Home equity and lines of credit           1,369               786               817  
    Commercial and industrial loans           4,450               1,977               2,767  
    Other loans           4               8               10  
    Total delinquent accruing loans held-for-investment $         16,057     $         6,265     $         8,683  

    The increase in multifamily delinquent loans was primarily due to two relationships totaling $1.5 million that became current subsequent to September 30, 2024. The increase in commercial real estate delinquent loans was primarily due to two participation loans totaling $5.6 million that matured, and the lead bank is in the process of extending their maturity and should become current in the fourth quarter of 2024. The increase in commercial and industrial delinquent loans from December 31, 2023, was primarily due to two loans to one borrower totaling $1.5 million which we expect to become current in the fourth quarter of 2024, and, to a lesser extent, an increase in delinquencies in unsecured small business loans.

    Subsequent to the quarter end, $1.1 million of home equity and lines of credit loans, $1.5 million of one-to-four family residential loans, and $1.5 million of commercial and industrial loans became current.

    PCD Loans (Held-for-Investment)

    The Company accounts for PCD loans at estimated fair value using discounted expected future cash flows deemed to be collectible on the date acquired. Based on its detailed review of PCD loans and experience in loan workouts, management believes it has a reasonable expectation about the amount and timing of future cash flows and accordingly has classified PCD loans ($9.3 million at September 30, 2024 and $9.9 million at December 31, 2023, respectively) as accruing, even though they may be contractually past due. At September 30, 2024, 2.1% of PCD loans were past due 30 to 89 days, and 24.6% were past due 90 days or more, as compared to 2.9% and 27.1%, respectively, at December 31, 2023.

    Our multifamily loan portfolio at September 30, 2024 totaled $2.64 billion, or 65% of our total loan portfolio, of which $447.5 million, or 11%, included loans collateralized by properties in New York with units subject to some percentage of rent regulation. The table below sets forth details about our multifamily loan portfolio in New York (dollars in thousands).

    % Rent Regulated   Balance   % Portfolio Total NY Multifamily Portfolio   Average Balance   Largest Loan   LTV*   Debt Service Coverage Ratio (DSCR)*   30-89 Days Delinquent   Non-Accrual   Special Mention   Substandard
    0   $         286,728             39.1   %   $         1,166     $         16,603     51.0%   1.57x   $         1,709     $         534     $         782     $         874  
    >0-10             4,745             0.7                 1,582               2,128     51.4   1.46             —               —               —               —  
    >10-20             18,681             2.5                 1,437               2,865     49.2   1.59             —               —               —               —  
    >20-30             19,585             2.7                 2,176               5,512     54.1   1.64             —               —               —               —  
    >30-40             15,183             2.1                 1,265               3,088     48.3   1.63             —               —               —               —  
    >40-50             22,208             3.0                 1,306               2,740     48.2   1.84             —               —               —               —  
    >50-60             9,452             1.3                 1,575               2,341     39.9   2.03             —               —               —               —  
    >60-70             19,201             2.6                 3,200               11,339     53.0   1.46             —               —               —               —  
    >70-80             22,405             3.1                 2,489               4,914     48.0   1.53             —               —               —               —  
    >80-90             20,820             2.8                 1,157               3,148     46.6   1.71             —               —               —               —  
    >90-100             295,256             40.1                 1,779               16,909     52.6   1.65             —               2,117               1,204               4,482  
    Total   $         734,264     100.0   %   $         1,454     $         16,909     51.2%   1.62x   $         1,709     $         2,651     $         1,986     $         5,356  

    The table below sets forth our New York rent-regulated loans by county (dollars in thousands).

    County   Balance   LTV*   DSCR*
    Bronx   $         118,400     51.7%   1.64x
    Kings             191,745     51.5%   1.66
    Nassau             2,176     36.2%   1.88
    New York             49,871     47.3%   1.64
    Queens             38,864     44.3%   1.81
    Richmond             28,790     60.6%   1.64
    Westchester             17,689     61.8%   1.37
    Total   $         447,535     51.4%   1.65x
                 
    * Weighted Average

    None of the loans that are rent-regulated in New York are interest only. During the remainder of 2024, one loan with an aggregate principal balance of $1.8 million will re-price.

    About Northfield Bank

    Northfield Bank, founded in 1887, operates 38 full-service banking offices in Staten Island and Brooklyn, New York, and Hunterdon, Middlesex, Mercer, and Union counties, New Jersey. For more information about Northfield Bank, please visit www.eNorthfield.com.

    Forward-Looking Statements: This release may contain certain “forward looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and may be identified by the use of such words as “may,” “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “should,” “plan,” “estimate,” “predict,” “continue,” and “potential” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. Examples of forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, estimates with respect to the financial condition, results of operations and business of Northfield Bancorp, Inc. Any or all of the forward-looking statements in this release and in any other public statements made by Northfield Bancorp, Inc. may turn out to be wrong. They can be affected by inaccurate assumptions Northfield Bancorp, Inc. might make or by known or unknown risks and uncertainties as described in our SEC filings, including, but not limited to, those related to general economic conditions, particularly in the market areas in which the Company operates, changes in liquidity, the size and composition of our deposit portfolio and the percentage of uninsured deposits in the portfolio, competition among depository and other financial institutions, including with respect to fees and interest rates, changes in laws or government regulations or policies affecting financial institutions, including changes in the monetary policies of the U.S. Treasury and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, changes in asset quality, prepayment speeds, charge-offs and/or credit loss provisions, our ability to access cost-effective funding, changes in the value of our goodwill or other intangible assets, changes in regulatory fees, assessments and capital requirements, inflation and changes in the interest rate environment that reduce our margins, reduce the fair value of financial instruments or reduce our ability to originate loans, cyber security and fraud risks against our information technology and those of our third-party providers and vendors, the effects of war, conflict, and acts of terrorism, our ability to successfully integrate acquired entities, adverse changes in the securities markets, and the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. Consequently, no forward-looking statement can be guaranteed. Northfield Bancorp, Inc. does not intend to update any of the forward-looking statements after the date of this release, or conform these statements to actual events.

     
    (Tables follow)
     
    NORTHFIELD BANCORP, INC.
    SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AND OTHER DATA
    (Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) (unaudited)
                   
                  At or For the
      At or For the Three Months Ended   Nine Months Ended
      September 30,   June 30   September 30,
      2024   2023   2024   2024   2023
    Selected Financial Ratios:                  
    Performance Ratios (1)                  
    Return on assets (ratio of net income to average total assets)         0.46   %           0.59   %           0.41   %           0.43   %           0.71   %
    Return on equity (ratio of net income to average equity)         3.74               4.74               3.45               3.59               5.69    
    Average equity to average total assets         12.24               12.49               12.00               12.09               12.44    
    Interest rate spread         1.42               1.69               1.44               1.42               1.91    
    Net interest margin         2.08               2.25               2.09               2.07               2.41    
    Efficiency ratio (2)         64.07               64.65               72.89               69.44               60.06    
    Non-interest expense to average total assets         1.43               1.49               1.60               1.53               1.50    
    Non-interest expense to average total interest-earning assets         1.50               1.56               1.68               1.60               1.57    
    Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities         128.75               132.21               128.47               128.63               133.66    
    Asset Quality Ratios:                  
    Non-performing assets to total assets         0.53               0.19               0.30               0.53               0.19    
    Non-performing loans (3) to total loans (4)         0.75               0.24               0.42               0.75               0.24    
    Allowance for credit losses to non-performing loans         115.67               378.67               200.96               115.67               378.67    
    Allowance for credit losses to total loans held-for-investment, net (5)         0.87               0.91               0.85               0.87               0.91    
    (1) Annualized where appropriate.
    (2) The efficiency ratio represents non-interest expense divided by the sum of net interest income and non-interest income.
    (3) Non-performing loans consist of non-accruing loans and loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing (excluding PCD loans), and are included in total loans held-for-investment, net.
    (4) Includes originated loans held-for-investment, PCD loans, acquired loans and loans held-for-sale.
    (5) Includes originated loans held-for-investment, PCD loans, and acquired loans.
     
    NORTHFIELD BANCORP, INC.
    CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
    (Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts) (unaudited)
     
      September 30, 2024   June 30, 2024   December 31, 2023
    ASSETS:          
    Cash and due from banks $         14,193     $         14,575     $         13,889  
    Interest-bearing deposits in other financial institutions           218,733               138,914               215,617  
    Total cash and cash equivalents           232,926               153,489               229,506  
    Trading securities           13,759               12,939               12,549  
    Debt securities available-for-sale, at estimated fair value           1,063,486               1,119,439               795,464  
    Debt securities held-to-maturity, at amortized cost           9,681               9,749               9,866  
    Equity securities           10,699               13,964               10,629  
    Loans held-for-sale           4,897               —               —  
    Loans held-for-investment, net           4,059,106               4,091,220               4,203,654  
    Allowance for credit losses           (35,197 )             (34,780 )             (37,535 )
    Net loans held-for-investment           4,023,909               4,056,440               4,166,119  
    Accrued interest receivable           19,299               19,343               18,491  
    Bank-owned life insurance           174,482               173,483               171,543  
    Federal Home Loan Bank of New York stock, at cost           37,269               41,785               39,667  
    Operating lease right-of-use assets           28,943               29,305               30,202  
    Premises and equipment, net           22,973               23,628               24,771  
    Goodwill           41,012               41,012               41,012  
    Other assets           47,516               51,785               48,577  
    Total assets $         5,730,851     $         5,746,361     $         5,598,396  
               
    LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY:          
    LIABILITIES:          
    Deposits $         3,875,569     $         3,798,474     $         3,878,435  
    Securities sold under agreements to repurchase           —               —               25,000  
    Federal Home Loan Bank advances and other borrowings           990,871               1,089,727               834,272  
    Subordinated debentures, net of issuance costs           61,386               61,331               61,219  
    Lease liabilities           33,529               34,035               35,205  
    Advance payments by borrowers for taxes and insurance           22,492               26,113               25,102  
    Accrued expenses and other liabilities           47,440               43,657               39,718  
    Total liabilities           5,031,287               5,053,337               4,898,951  
               
    STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY:          
    Total stockholders’ equity           699,564               693,024               699,445  
    Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $         5,730,851     $         5,746,361     $         5,598,396  
               
    Total shares outstanding           42,904,342               43,466,961               44,524,929  
    Tangible book value per share (1) $         15.35     $         15.00     $         14.78  
    (1) Tangible book value per share is calculated based on total stockholders’ equity, excluding intangible assets (goodwill and core deposit intangibles), divided by total shares outstanding as of the balance sheet date. Core deposit intangibles were $90, $111, and $154 at September 30, 2024, June 30, 2024, and December 31, 2023, respectively, and are included in other assets.
     
    NORTHFIELD BANCORP, INC.
    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
    (Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts) (unaudited)
     
      For the Three Months Ended   For the Nine Months Ended
      September 30,   June 30,   September 30,
        2024       2023       2024       2024       2023  
    Interest income:                  
    Loans $         46,016     $         46,213     $         45,967     $         138,030     $         135,220  
    Mortgage-backed securities           8,493               3,664               7,355               20,246               11,170  
    Other securities           2,684               1,095               3,506               10,031               3,593  
    Federal Home Loan Bank of New York dividends           914               933               935               2,819               2,125  
    Deposits in other financial institutions           1,211               831               2,457               7,060               2,225  
    Total interest income           59,318               52,736               60,220               178,186               154,333  
    Interest expense:                  
    Deposits           20,304               13,614               20,664               60,241               31,918  
    Borrowings           9,949               8,593               10,041               30,653               24,182  
    Subordinated debt           836               837               828               2,492               2,484  
    Total interest expense           31,089               23,044               31,533               93,386               58,584  
    Net interest income           28,229               29,692               28,687               84,800               95,749  
    Provision/(benefit) for credit losses           2,542               188               (618 )             2,339               1,082  
    Net interest income after (benefit)/provision for credit losses           25,687               29,504               29,305               82,461               94,667  
    Non-interest income:                  
    Fees and service charges for customer services           1,611               1,317               1,570               4,796               4,006  
    Income on bank-owned life insurance           999               920               976               2,939               2,679  
    (Losses)/gains on available-for-sale debt securities, net           (7 )             —               1               (6 )             (17 )
    Gains/(losses) on trading securities, net           710               (295 )             188               1,597               723  
    Gain on sale of loans           —               99               51               51               134  
    Other           265               80               73               441               744  
    Total non-interest income           3,578               2,121               2,859               9,818               8,269  
    Non-interest expense:                  
    Compensation and employee benefits           11,424               10,920               13,388               37,577               34,310  
    Occupancy           3,030               3,416               3,222               9,805               10,032  
    Furniture and equipment           450               479               477               1,411               1,393  
    Data processing           1,780               1,994               2,177               6,104               6,308  
    Professional fees           943               883               681               2,433               2,622  
    Advertising           282               414               482               1,282               1,834  
    Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance           626               591               649               1,863               1,763  
    Credit loss expense/(benefit) for off-balance sheet exposures           151               160               103               337               (390 )
    Other           1,692               1,710               1,814               4,891               4,598  
    Total non-interest expense           20,378               20,567               22,993               65,703               62,470  
    Income before income tax expense           8,887               11,058               9,171               26,576               40,466  
    Income tax expense           2,364               2,877               3,214               7,882               11,019  
    Net income $         6,523     $         8,181     $         5,957     $         18,694     $         29,447  
    Net income per common share:                  
    Basic $         0.16     $         0.19     $         0.14     $         0.45     $         0.67  
    Diluted $         0.16     $         0.19     $         0.14     $         0.45     $         0.67  
    Basic average shares outstanding           41,028,213               42,866,246               41,999,541               41,794,149               43,848,873  
    Diluted average shares outstanding           41,088,637               42,918,174               42,002,650               41,829,230               43,927,350  
     
    NORTHFIELD BANCORP, INC.
    ANALYSIS OF NET INTEREST INCOME
    (Dollars in thousands) (unaudited)
     
      For the Three Months Ended
      September 30, 2024   June 30, 2024   September 30, 2023
      Average Outstanding Balance   Interest   Average Yield/ Rate (1)   Average Outstanding Balance   Interest   Average Yield/ Rate (1)   Average Outstanding Balance   Interest   Average Yield/ Rate (1)
    Interest-earning assets:                                  
    Loans (2) $         4,079,974     $         46,016             4.49   %   $         4,128,105     $         45,967             4.48   %   $         4,252,752     $         46,213             4.31   %
    Mortgage-backed securities (3)           901,042               8,493             3.75                 824,498               7,355             3.59                 660,753               3,664             2.20    
    Other securities (3)           273,312               2,684             3.91                 333,855               3,506             4.22                 209,341               1,095             2.08    
    Federal Home Loan Bank of New York stock           38,044               914             9.56                 38,707               935             9.72                 41,278               933             8.97    
    Interest-earning deposits in financial institutions           99,837               1,211             4.83                 191,470               2,457             5.16                 73,005               831             4.52    
    Total interest-earning assets           5,392,209               59,318             4.38                 5,516,635               60,220             4.39                 5,237,129               52,736             4.00    
    Non-interest-earning assets           275,342                       265,702                       248,315          
    Total assets $         5,667,551             $         5,782,337             $         5,485,444          
                                       
    Interest-bearing liabilities:                                  
    Savings, NOW, and money market accounts $         2,417,725     $         12,717             2.09   %   $         2,490,372     $         13,183             2.13   %   $         2,408,218     $         8,865             1.46   %
    Certificates of deposit           700,763               7,587             4.31                 701,272               7,481             4.29                 551,904               4,749             3.41    
    Total interest-bearing deposits           3,118,488               20,304             2.59                 3,191,644               20,664             2.60                 2,960,122               13,614             1.82    
    Borrowed funds           1,008,338               9,949             3.93                 1,041,035               10,041             3.88                 939,922               8,593             3.63    
    Subordinated debt           61,350               836             5.42                 61,294               828             5.43                 61,127               837             5.43    
    Total interest-bearing liabilities           4,188,176               31,089             2.95                 4,293,973               31,533             2.95                 3,961,171               23,044             2.31    
    Non-interest bearing deposits           683,283                       691,384                       739,266          
    Accrued expenses and other liabilities           102,233                       103,082                       100,103          
    Total liabilities           4,973,692                       5,088,439                       4,800,540          
    Stockholders’ equity           693,859                       693,898                       684,904          
    Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $         5,667,551             $         5,782,337             $         5,485,444          
                                       
    Net interest income     $         28,229             $         28,687             $         29,692      
    Net interest rate spread (4)                 1.42   %                   1.44   %                   1.69   %
    Net interest-earning assets (5) $         1,204,033             $         1,222,662             $         1,275,958          
    Net interest margin (6)                 2.08   %                   2.09   %                   2.25   %
    Average interest-earning assets to interest-bearing liabilities                 128.75   %                   128.47   %                   132.21   %
    (1) Average yields and rates are annualized.
    (2) Includes non-accruing loans.
    (3) Securities available-for-sale and other securities are reported at amortized cost.
    (4) Net interest rate spread represents the difference between the weighted average yield on interest-earning assets and the weighted average cost of interest-bearing liabilities.
    (5) Net interest-earning assets represent total interest-earning assets less total interest-bearing liabilities.
    (6) Net interest margin represents net interest income divided by average total interest-earning assets.
       
      For the Nine Months Ended
      September 30, 2024   September 30, 2023
      Average Outstanding Balance   Interest   Average Yield/ Rate (1)   Average Outstanding Balance   Interest   Average Yield/ Rate (1)
    Interest-earning assets:                      
    Loans (2) $         4,127,409     $         138,030             4.47   %   $         4,260,827     $         135,220             4.24   %
    Mortgage-backed securities (3)           791,850               20,246             3.42                 703,320               11,170             2.12    
    Other securities (3)           332,831               10,031             4.03                 241,280               3,593             1.99    
    Federal Home Loan Bank of New York stock           38,781               2,819             9.71                 41,093               2,125             6.91    
    Interest-earning deposits in financial institutions           184,420               7,060             5.11                 72,683               2,225             4.09    
    Total interest-earning assets           5,475,291               178,186             4.35                 5,319,203               154,333             3.88    
    Non-interest-earning assets           269,180                       244,319          
    Total assets $         5,744,471             $         5,563,522          
                           
    Interest-bearing liabilities:                      
    Savings, NOW, and money market accounts $         2,457,320     $         38,231             2.08   %   $         2,443,400     $         19,194             1.05   %
    Certificates of deposit           685,510               22,010             4.29                 572,283               12,724             2.97    
    Total interest-bearing deposits           3,142,830               60,241             2.56                 3,015,683               31,918             1.42    
    Borrowed funds           1,052,589               30,653             3.89                 902,802               24,182             3.58    
    Subordinated debt           61,294               2,492             5.43                 61,164               2,484             5.43    
    Total interest-bearing liabilities $         4,256,713               93,386             2.93       $         3,979,649               58,584             1.97    
    Non-interest bearing deposits           691,406                       788,991          
    Accrued expenses and other liabilities           101,639                       102,765          
    Total liabilities           5,049,758                       4,871,405          
    Stockholders’ equity           694,713                       692,117          
    Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $         5,744,471             $         5,563,522          
                           
    Net interest income     $         84,800             $         95,749      
    Net interest rate spread (4)                 1.42   %                   1.91   %
    Net interest-earning assets (5) $         1,218,578             $         1,339,554          
    Net interest margin (6)                 2.07   %                   2.41   %
    Average interest-earning assets to interest-bearing liabilities                 128.63   %                   133.66   %
    (1) Average yields and rates are annualized. 
    (2) Includes non-accruing loans. 
    (3) Securities available-for-sale and other securities are reported at amortized cost.
    (4) Net interest rate spread represents the difference between the weighted average yield on interest-earning assets and the weighted average cost of interest-bearing liabilities.
    (5) Net interest-earning assets represent total interest-earning assets less total interest-bearing liabilities.
    (6) Net interest margin represents net interest income divided by average total interest-earning assets.

    Company Contact:
    William R. Jacobs
    Chief Financial Officer
    Tel: (732) 499-7200 ext. 2519

    The MIL Network –

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Historic visit by UK Prime Minister paves way for closer economic ties for the Commonwealth

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    The Commonwealth has a once in a generation chance to be a driving force for opportunity and growth in an increasingly contested world, the Prime Minister is set to say on a landmark visit to the Pacific this week.

    • Prime Minister to make the case that the Commonwealth has a once in a generation chance to be a driving force for opportunity and growth during visit to Samoa 

    • New UK Trade Centre of Expertise set to bolster economic ties across the grouping and unlock markets for UK businesses  

    • Keir Starmer makes history as first ever sitting UK Prime Minister to visit a Pacific Island country

    The Commonwealth has a once in a generation chance to be a driving force for opportunity and growth in an increasingly contested world, the Prime Minister is set to say on a landmark visit to the Pacific this week.  

    It comes as the government uses its foreign policy agenda to deliver for people at home, working with partners across the globe on issues such as climate change, growth and energy security. 

    Keir Starmer will arrive in Samoa for the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting today [Thursday 24 October], joining 55 other Commonwealth delegations to discuss the shared challenges and opportunities faced by its members.  

    In doing so, he will make history as the first UK Prime Minister to ever visit a Pacific Island country.   

    The Prime Minister will use the trip to make the case that Commonwealth countries, no matter where they are in the world, need resilient and thriving economies to face the global challenges of the day.  

    And he will tell delegates that he believes the Commonwealth offers a unique opportunity to be able to build those economies, combining major traditional markets with rapidly growing economies and resilient, innovative communities.  

    By 2027, the Commonwealth is expected be home to six of the world’s ten fastest-growing economies – Guyana, Rwanda, Bangladesh, Uganda, India and Mozambique – and have a combined GDP exceeding $19.5 trillion, while more than 60% of the grouping’s 2.5 billion population will be under 30. 

    The Commonwealth, which includes some of the UK’s biggest trading partners such as India, Canada, Australia, Singapore and South Africa, already accounts for 9% of total UK trade, worth £164 billion in 2023. And its members benefit from a 21% average reduction in bilateral trade costs, as well as higher investment flows between Commonwealth members.  

    As part of the visit, the Prime Minister will announce a new UK Trade Centre of Expertise, operating out of the Foreign Office, to drive export-led growth across the grouping. Trade specialists will provide technical and practical assistance to developing countries to help them access and compete in global markets.  

    In turn, the partnership is expected to help UK businesses tap into some of the fastest growing economies in the world, such as Uganda and Bangladesh through strengthened economic ties. Over the long term, the project will also aim to lift economies out of poverty, reducing pressure on UK Aid and British taxpayers. 

    The Prime Minister is also expected to meet business leaders during CHOGM, as part of his personal campaign to drive investment into every corner of the United Kingdom. 

    The meeting, which will include business leaders such as Brian Moynihan, chairman and CEO of Bank of America, and John Neal, CEO of Lloyd’s of London, comes just 10 days after the UK hosted the International Investment Summit, which drove £63 billion of private investment and 38,000 jobs into the UK. 

    Prime Minister Keir Starmer said: 

    We have a once-in-a-generation opportunity to fix the foundations and change our country’s story to turn around the lives of everyday people in the UK, but we can’t do that with a protectionist approach.

    Under this government’s pragmatic and sensible approach, we must harness the opportunities to work with genuine partners – like our Commonwealth family – across the world to build resilient economies that offer real opportunity for our people, whether that is accessing untapped markets, or collaborating on grassroots innovations.

    The combined GDP of the Commonwealth is expected to exceed $19.5 trillion in the next three years, we cannot let that economic heft go to waste.

    Alongside the Commonwealth Secretary General, the Foreign Secretary is expected to convene Commonwealth foreign ministers to launch a new Commonwealth Investment Plan of Action to mobilise investment across the membership. 

    The plan will focus on small and vulnerable economies, easing barriers to trade and investment. The Foreign Secretary will also launch two new trade hubs to help female entrepreneurs in India and Sri Lanka access global markets.   

    Foreign Secretary David Lammy said: 

    The Commonwealth is a unique forum encompassing 56 countries and a third of the world’s population brought together through shared history and friendship.

    Representing some of the world’s fastest growing economies, forging stronger ties with these markets is crucial for delivering jobs and economic growth.

    This government is reconnecting Britain in the world and building partnerships that will unlock greater prosperity for all.

    During the three-day CHOGM summit, leaders will discuss some of the pressing issues facing Commonwealth nations, including climate change, education and democracy.  

    On Friday, the Prime Minister is expected to attend a lunch, hosted by the King for new heads of government, before attending two Commonwealth executive sessions, and the heads of government dinner.

    Updates to this page

    Published 24 October 2024

    MIL OSI United Kingdom –

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Press release: Historic visit by UK Prime Minister paves way for closer economic ties for the Commonwealth

    Source: United Kingdom – Prime Minister’s Office 10 Downing Street

    The Commonwealth has a once in a generation chance to be a driving force for opportunity and growth in an increasingly contested world, the Prime Minister is set to say on a landmark visit to the Pacific this week.

    • Prime Minister to make the case that the Commonwealth has a once in a generation chance to be a driving force for opportunity and growth during visit to Samoa 

    • New UK Trade Centre of Expertise set to bolster economic ties across the grouping and unlock markets for UK businesses  

    • Keir Starmer makes history as first ever sitting UK Prime Minister to visit a Pacific Island country

    The Commonwealth has a once in a generation chance to be a driving force for opportunity and growth in an increasingly contested world, the Prime Minister is set to say on a landmark visit to the Pacific this week.  

    It comes as the government uses its foreign policy agenda to deliver for people at home, working with partners across the globe on issues such as climate change, growth and energy security. 

    Keir Starmer will arrive in Samoa for the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting today [Thursday 24 October], joining 55 other Commonwealth delegations to discuss the shared challenges and opportunities faced by its members.  

    In doing so, he will make history as the first UK Prime Minister to ever visit a Pacific Island country.   

    The Prime Minister will use the trip to make the case that Commonwealth countries, no matter where they are in the world, need resilient and thriving economies to face the global challenges of the day.  

    And he will tell delegates that he believes the Commonwealth offers a unique opportunity to be able to build those economies, combining major traditional markets with rapidly growing economies and resilient, innovative communities.  

    By 2027, the Commonwealth is expected be home to six of the world’s ten fastest-growing economies – Guyana, Rwanda, Bangladesh, Uganda, India and Mozambique – and have a combined GDP exceeding $19.5 trillion, while more than 60% of the grouping’s 2.5 billion population will be under 30. 

    The Commonwealth, which includes some of the UK’s biggest trading partners such as India, Canada, Australia, Singapore and South Africa, already accounts for 9% of total UK trade, worth £164 billion in 2023. And its members benefit from a 21% average reduction in bilateral trade costs, as well as higher investment flows between Commonwealth members.  

    As part of the visit, the Prime Minister will announce a new UK Trade Centre of Expertise, operating out of the Foreign Office, to drive export-led growth across the grouping. Trade specialists will provide technical and practical assistance to developing countries to help them access and compete in global markets.  

    In turn, the partnership is expected to help UK businesses tap into some of the fastest growing economies in the world, such as Uganda and Bangladesh through strengthened economic ties. Over the long term, the project will also aim to lift economies out of poverty, reducing pressure on UK Aid and British taxpayers. 

    The Prime Minister is also expected to meet business leaders during CHOGM, as part of his personal campaign to drive investment into every corner of the United Kingdom. 

    The meeting, which will include business leaders such as Brian Moynihan, chairman and CEO of Bank of America, and John Neal, CEO of Lloyd’s of London, comes just 10 days after the UK hosted the International Investment Summit, which drove £63 billion of private investment and 38,000 jobs into the UK. 

    Prime Minister Keir Starmer said: 

    We have a once-in-a-generation opportunity to fix the foundations and change our country’s story to turn around the lives of everyday people in the UK, but we can’t do that with a protectionist approach.

    Under this government’s pragmatic and sensible approach, we must harness the opportunities to work with genuine partners – like our Commonwealth family – across the world to build resilient economies that offer real opportunity for our people, whether that is accessing untapped markets, or collaborating on grassroots innovations.

    The combined GDP of the Commonwealth is expected to exceed $19.5 trillion in the next three years, we cannot let that economic heft go to waste.

    Alongside the Commonwealth Secretary General, the Foreign Secretary is expected to convene Commonwealth foreign ministers to launch a new Commonwealth Investment Plan of Action to mobilise investment across the membership. 

    The plan will focus on small and vulnerable economies, easing barriers to trade and investment. The Foreign Secretary will also launch two new trade hubs to help female entrepreneurs in India and Sri Lanka access global markets.   

    Foreign Secretary David Lammy said: 

    The Commonwealth is a unique forum encompassing 56 countries and a third of the world’s population brought together through shared history and friendship.

    Representing some of the world’s fastest growing economies, forging stronger ties with these markets is crucial for delivering jobs and economic growth.

    This government is reconnecting Britain in the world and building partnerships that will unlock greater prosperity for all.

    During the three-day CHOGM summit, leaders will discuss some of the pressing issues facing Commonwealth nations, including climate change, education and democracy.  

    On Friday, the Prime Minister is expected to attend a lunch, hosted by the King for new heads of government, before attending two Commonwealth executive sessions, and the heads of government dinner.

    Updates to this page

    Published 24 October 2024

    MIL OSI United Kingdom –

  • MIL-OSI: Northrim BanCorp Earns $8.8 Million, or $1.57 Per Diluted Share, in Third Quarter 2024

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    ANCHORAGE, Alaska, Oct. 23, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Northrim BanCorp, Inc. (NASDAQ:NRIM) (“Northrim” or the “Company”) today reported net income of $8.8 million, or $1.57 per diluted share, in the third quarter of 2024, compared to $9.0 million, or $1.62 per diluted share, in the second quarter of 2024, and $8.4 million, or $1.48 per diluted share, in the third quarter a year ago. The increase in third quarter 2024 profitability as compared to the third quarter a year ago was primarily the result of an increase in mortgage banking income and higher net interest income, which was only partially offset by higher other operating expenses and a higher provision for credit losses.

    Dividends per share in the third quarter of 2024 increased to $0.62 per share as compared to $0.61 per share in the second quarter of 2024 and $0.60 per share in the third quarter of 2023.

    “We had strong deposit-funded loan growth in the third quarter,” said Mike Huston, Northrim’s President and Chief Executive Officer. “Deposits and loans both increased 7% from the end of the second quarter. Our deposit market share increased by 4% in the past year and by 42% in the past five years as our investments in people, expanded branch network, and differentiated service continue to attract new customers and strengthen existing relationships.”

    Third Quarter 2024 Highlights:

    • Net interest income in the third quarter of 2024 increased 7% to $28.8 million compared to $27.1 million in the second quarter of 2024 and increased 9% compared to $26.4 million in the third quarter of 2023.
    • Net interest margin on a tax equivalent basis (“NIMTE”)* was 4.35% for the third quarter of 2024, up 5-basis points from the second quarter of 2024 and up 14-basis points from the third quarter a year ago.
    • Return on average assets (“ROAA”) was 1.22% and return on average equity (“ROAE”) was 13.69% for the third quarter of 2024.
    • Portfolio loans were $2.01 billion at September 30, 2024, up 7% from the preceding quarter and up 17% from a year ago, primarily due to new customer relationships, expanding market share, and to retaining certain mortgages originated by Residential Mortgage, a subsidiary of Northrim Bank (the “Bank”), in the loan portfolio.
    • Total deposits were $2.63 billion at September 30, 2024, up 7% from the preceding quarter, and up 8% from $2.43 billion a year ago. Non-interest bearing demand deposits increased 8% from the preceding quarter and decreased slightly year-over-year to $763.6 million at September 30, 2024 and represent 29% of total deposits.
    • The average cost of interest-bearing deposits was 2.24% at September 30, 2024, up from 2.21% at June 30, 2024 and 1.75% at September 30, 2023.
    • Mortgage loan originations increased to $248.0 million in the third quarter of 2024, up from $181.5 million in the second quarter of 2024 and $153.4 million in the third quarter a year ago. Mortgage loans funded for sale were $210.0 million in the third quarter of 2024, compared to $152.3 million in the second quarter of 2024 and $131.9 million in the third quarter of 2023.
    Financial Highlights   Three Months Ended 
    (Dollars in thousands, except per share data) September 30,
    2024    		 June 30, 2024 March 31, 2024 December 31,
    2023    		 September 30,
    2023
    Total assets $2,963,392   $2,821,668 $2,759,560   $2,807,497   $2,790,189  
    Total portfolio loans $2,007,565   $1,875,907 $1,811,135   $1,789,497   $1,720,091  
    Total deposits $2,625,567   $2,463,806 $2,434,083   $2,485,055   $2,427,930  
    Total shareholders’ equity $260,050   $247,200 $239,327   $234,718   $225,259  
    Net income $8,825   $9,020 $8,199   $6,613   $8,374  
    Diluted earnings per share $1.57   $1.62 $1.48   $1.19   $1.48  
    Return on average assets   1.22 %   1.31 %   1.19 %   0.93 %   1.22 %
    Return on average shareholders’ equity   13.69 %   14.84 %   13.84 %   11.36 %   14.67 %
    NIM   4.29 %   4.24 %   4.16 %   4.06 %   4.15 %
    NIMTE*   4.35 %   4.30 %   4.22 %   4.12 %   4.21 %
    Efficiency ratio   66.11 %   68.78 %   68.93 %   72.21 %   66.64 %
    Total shareholders’ equity/total assets   8.78 %   8.76 %   8.67 %   8.36 %   8.07 %
    Tangible common equity/tangible assets*   8.28 %   8.24 %   8.14 %   7.84 %   7.54 %
    Book value per share $47.27   $44.93   $43.52   $42.57   $40.60  
    Tangible book value per share* $44.36   $42.03   $40.61   $39.68   $37.72  
    Dividends per share $0.62   $0.61   $0.61   $0.60   $0.60  
    Common stock outstanding   5,501,943     5,501,562     5,499,578     5,513,459     5,548,436  


    *     References to NIMTE, tangible book value per share, and tangible common equity to tangible common assets, (all of which exclude intangible assets) represent non-GAAP financial measures. Management has presented these non-GAAP measurements in this earnings release, because it believes these measures are useful to investors. See the end of this release for reconciliations of these non-GAAP financial measures to GAAP financial measures.

    Alaska Economic Update
    (Note: sources for information included in this section are included on page 12.)

    The Alaska Department of Labor (“DOL”) has reported Alaska’s seasonally adjusted unemployment rate in August of 2024 was 4.6% compared to the U.S. rate of 4.2%. The total number of payroll jobs in Alaska, not including uniformed military, increased 1.8% or 6,400 jobs between August of 2023 and August of 2024.

    According to the DOL, the Construction sector had the largest growth in new jobs through August compared to the prior year. The Construction sector added 2,600 positions for a year over year growth rate of 12.9% between August of 2023 and 2024. The larger Health Care sector grew by 2,000 jobs for an annual growth rate of 4.9% over the same period. The Oil & Gas sector increased by 6.5% or 500 new direct jobs. Professional and Business Services added 1,000 jobs year over year through August of 2024, up 3.4%. The Government sector grew by 700 jobs for 0.9% growth, adding 500 Federal jobs and 200 Local government positions in Alaska. The only sectors to decline between August 2023 and August 2024 were Manufacturing (primarily seafood processing) shrinking 1,300 positions and Information, down 200 jobs.

    Alaska’s Gross State Product (“GSP”) in the second quarter of 2024, was estimated to be $69.8 billion in current dollars, according to the Federal Bureau of Economic Analysis (“BEA”). Alaska’s inflation adjusted “real” GSP increased 6.5% in 2023, placing Alaska fifth best of all 50 states. However, in the second quarter of 2024 Alaska decreased at an annualized rate of 1.1%, compared to the average U.S. growth rate of 3%. Alaska’s real GSP decline in the second quarter of 2024 was primarily caused by a slowdown in the Mining, Oil & Gas; and Transportation and Warehousing sectors.

    The BEA also calculated Alaska’s seasonally adjusted personal income at $55.4 billion in the second quarter of 2024. This was an annualized improvement of 4% for Alaska, compared to the national average of 5.3%.

    The monthly average price of Alaska North Slope (“ANS”) crude oil was at an annual high of $89.05 in April of 2024 and averaged $74.06 in September of this year. The Alaska Department of Revenue (“DOR”) calculated ANS crude oil production was 479 thousand barrels per day (“bpd”) in Alaska’s fiscal year ending June 30, 2023 and declined to 461 thousand bpd in Alaska’s fiscal year 2024. Starting in fiscal year 2025 it is projected to grow to 477 thousand bpd. The DOR projects the number to grow rapidly and reach 640 thousand bpd by fiscal year 2033. This is primarily a result of new production coming on-line in and around the NPR-A region west of Prudhoe Bay.

    According to the Alaska Multiple Listing Services, the average sales price of a single family home in Anchorage rose 5.2% in 2023 to $480,207, following a 7.6% increase in 2022. This was the sixth consecutive year of price increases.   In the first nine months of 2024 the average price continues to increase 6.8% to an average sale of
    $512,815.

    The average sales price for single family homes in the Matanuska Susitna Borough rose 4% in 2023 to $397,589, after increasing 9.9% in 2022. This continues a trend of average price increases for more than a decade in the region. In the first nine months of 2024 the average sales price increased 4.6% in the Matanuska Susitna Borough to $415,709. These two markets represent where the vast majority of the Bank’s residential lending activity occurs.

    The Alaska Multiple Listing Services reported a 1.2% decrease in the number of units sold in Anchorage when comparing January to September of 2023 and 2024. There were 5.4% less homes sold in the Matanuska Susitna Borough for the same nine month time period in 2024 compared to the prior year.

    Northrim Bank sponsors the Alaskanomics blog to provide news, analysis, and commentary on Alaska’s economy. Join the conversation at Alaskanomics.com, or for more information on the Alaska economy, visit: www.northrim.com and click on the “Business Banking” link and then click “Learn.” Information from our website is not incorporated into, and does not form, a part of this earnings release.

    Review of Income Statement

    Consolidated Income Statement

    In the third quarter of 2024, Northrim generated a ROAA of 1.22% and a ROAE of 13.69%, compared to 1.31% and 14.84%, respectively, in the second quarter of 2024 and 1.22% and 14.67%, respectively, in the third quarter a year ago.

    Net Interest Income/Net Interest Margin

    Net interest income increased 7% to $28.8 million in the third quarter of 2024 compared to $27.1 million in the second quarter of 2024 and increased 9% compared to $26.4 million in the third quarter of 2023. Interest expense on deposits increased to $10.1 million in the third quarter of 2024 compared to $9.5 million in the second quarter and $7.1 million in the third quarter of 2023.

    NIMTE* was 4.35% in the third quarter of 2024 up from 4.30% in the preceding quarter and 4.21% in the third quarter a year ago. NIMTE* increased 14 basis points in the third quarter of 2024 compared to the third quarter of 2023 primarily due to a favorable change in the mix of earning-assets towards higher loan balances as a percentage of total earning-assets, higher earning-assets, and higher yields on those assets which were only partially offset by an increase in costs on interest-bearing deposits. The weighted average interest rate for new loans booked in the third quarter of 2024 was 7.24% compared to 7.90% in the second quarter of 2024 and 7.44% in the third quarter a year ago. The yield on the investment portfolio in the third quarter of 2024 decreased slightly to 2.80% from 2.82% in the second quarter of 2024 and increased from 2.43% in the third quarter of 2023. “We continue to see the benefit of new loan volume and repricing outweigh the modest increase in deposit costs in the third quarter of 2024,” said Jed Ballard, Chief Financial Officer. Northrim’s NIMTE* continues to remain above the peer average of 3.13% posted by the S&P U.S. Small Cap Bank Index with total market capitalization between $250 million and $1 billion as of June 30, 2024.

    Provision for Credit Losses

    Northrim recorded a provision for credit losses of $2.1 million in the third quarter of 2024, which was comprised of of a $325,000 provision for credit losses on unfunded commitments and a provision for credit losses on loans of $1.7 million. The provision for unfunded commitments was primarily due to an increase in unfunded commitments, as well as an increase in estimated loss rates due to changes in mix and management’s assessment of economic conditions. The increase to the provision for credit losses on loans was primarily a result of loan growth, as well as an increase in the provision for loans individually evaluated and an increase in estimated loss rates. This compares to a benefit to the provision for credit losses of $120,000 in the second quarter of 2024, and provision for credit losses of $1.2 million in the third quarter a year ago.

    Nonperforming loans, net of government guarantees, increased slightly during the quarter to $5.0 million at September 30, 2024, compared to $4.8 million at June 30, 2024, and decreased from $5.1 million at September 30, 2023.

    The allowance for credit losses on loans was 394% of nonperforming loans, net of government guarantees, at the end of the third quarter of 2024, compared to 365% three months earlier and 326% a year ago.

    Other Operating Income

    In addition to home mortgage lending, Northrim has interests in other businesses that complement its core community banking activities, including purchased receivables financing and wealth management. Other operating income contributed $11.6 million, or 29% of total third quarter 2024 revenues, as compared to $9.6 million, or 26% of revenues in the second quarter of 2024, and $8.0 million, or 23% of revenues in the third quarter of 2023. The increase in other operating income in the third quarter of 2024 as compared to the preceding quarter and the third quarter of 2023 was primarily the result of an increase in mortgage banking income due to a higher volume of mortgage activity. See further discussion regarding mortgage activity during the second quarter contained under “Home Mortgage Lending” below. The fair market value of marketable equity securities increased $576,000 in the third quarter of 2024 compared to a decrease of $60,000 in the prior quarter and an increase of $12,000 in the third quarter of 2023. The increase in other operating income in the third quarter of 2024 as compared to the third quarter a year ago was due primarily to an increase in mortgage banking income as a result of higher volume of mortgage activity due to our expansion in Arizona, Colorado, and the Pacific Northwest markets, as well as an increase in fair value of marketable equity securities.

    Other Operating Expenses

    Operating expenses were $26.7 million in the third quarter of 2024, compared to $25.2 million in the second quarter of 2024, and $22.9 million in the third quarter of 2023. The increase in other operating expenses in the third quarter of 2024 compared to the second quarter of 2024 was primarily due to an increase in salaries and other personnel expense, including $653,000 in mortgage commissions expense due to higher mortgage volume and a $979,000 increase in profit share expense, which was partially offset by a $836,000 decrease in medical claims expense. The increase in other operating expenses in the third quarter of 2024 compared to a year ago was primarily due to an increase in salaries and other personnel expense, as well as an increase in OREO expense due to a gain on sale recorded in the third quarter of 2023 for proceeds received related to a government guarantee on an OREO property sold in December 2022.

    Income Tax Provision

    In the third quarter of 2024, Northrim recorded $2.8 million in state and federal income tax expense for an effective tax rate of 24.2%, compared to $2.5 million, or 21.9% in the second quarter of 2024 and $1.9 million, or 18.4% in the third quarter a year ago. The increase in the tax rate in the third quarter of 2024 as compared to the third quarter of 2023 is primarily the result of a decrease in tax credits and tax exempt interest income as a percentage of pre-tax income in 2024 as compared to 2023.

    Community Banking

    In the most recent deposit market share data from the FDIC, Northrim’s deposit market share in Alaska increased to 15.66% of Alaska’s total deposits as of June 30, 2024 compared to 15.04% of Alaska’s total deposits as of June 30, 2023. This represents 62 basis points of growth in market share percentage for Northrim during that period while, according to the FDIC, the total deposits in Alaska were up 2.3% during the same period. Northrim opened a branch in Kodiak in the first quarter of 2023, a loan production office in Homer in the second quarter of 2023, a permanent branch in Nome in the third quarter of 2023, and a branch in Homer in the first quarter of 2024. See below for further discussion regarding the Company’s deposit movement for the quarter.

    Northrim is committed to meeting the needs of the diverse communities in which it operates. As a testament to that support, the Bank has branches in four regions of Alaska identified by the Federal Reserve as ‘distressed or underserved non-metropolitan middle-income geographies’.

    Net interest income in the Community Banking segment totaled $25.9 million in the third quarter of 2024, compared to $24.3 million in the second quarter of 2024 and $24.1 million in the third quarter of 2023. Net interest income increased 7% in the third quarter of 2024 as compared to the second quarter of 2024 mostly due to higher interest income on loans. This increase was only partially offset by higher interest expense on deposits and borrowings and lower interest income on portfolio investments.

    Other operating expenses in the Community Banking segment totaled $19.1 million in the third quarter of 2024, up $588,000 or 3% from $18.5 million in the second quarter of 2024, and up $2.1 million or 13% from $16.9 million in the third quarter a year ago. The increase in the third quarter of 2024 as compared to the prior quarter was mostly due to an increases in salaries and other personnel expense, marketing expense, and professional fees. The increase in the third quarter of 2024 as compared to the third quarter a year ago was primarily due to an increase in OREO expense due to a gain on sale recorded in the third quarter of 2023 for proceeds received related to a government guarantee on an OREO property sold in December 2022, as well as increases in salaries and other personnel expense and marketing expense.

    The following tables provide highlights of the Community Banking segment of Northrim:

      Three Months Ended
      September   March 31, December September
    (Dollars in thousands, except per share data) 30, 2024 June 30, 2024   2024   31, 2023   30, 2023
    Net interest income $25,901 $24,278 $24,215 $24,456 $24,050
    (Benefit) provision for credit losses 1,492 (184)   197   885   1,190
    Other operating income 4,540 3,693   3,813   4,048   3,597
    Other operating expense 19,085 18,497   17,552   18,516   16,946
    Income before provision for income taxes 9,864 9,658   10,279   9,103   9,511
    Provision for income taxes 2,316 2,004   2,242   1,941   1,709
    Net income $7,548 $7,654 $8,037 $7,162 $7,802
    Weighted average shares outstanding, diluted 5,583,055 5,558,580   5,554,930   5,578,491   5,624,906
    Diluted earnings per share $1.34 $1.37 $1.45 $1.29 $1.39
      Year-to-date
    (Dollars in thousands, except per share data) September
    30, 2024    		 September
    30, 2023
    Net interest income $ 74,394 $ 71,502
    Provision for credit losses   1,505   2,957
    Other operating income   12,046   9,564
    Other operating expense   55,134   52,168
    Income before provision for income taxes   29,801   25,941
    Provision for income taxes   6,562   5,216
    Net income Community Banking segment $ 23,239 $ 20,725
    Weighted average shares outstanding, diluted   5,574,135   5,688,687
    Diluted earnings per share $ 4.16 $ 3.64

    Home Mortgage Lending

    During the third quarter of 2024, mortgage loans funded for sale increased to $210.0 million, compared to $152.3 million in the second quarter of 2024, and $131.9 million in the third quarter of 2023.

    During the third quarter of 2024, the Bank purchased Residential Mortgage-originated loans of $38.1 million of which roughly two-thirds were jumbos and one-third were mortgages for second homes, with a weighted average interest rate of 6.59%, up from $29.2 million and 6.82% in the second quarter of 2024, and up from $21.6 million and 6.60% in the third quarter of 2023. The increase in mortgage loans funded for investment has increased net interest income in the Home Mortgage Lending segment. Net interest income contributed $2.9 million to total revenue in the third quarter of 2024, up from $2.8 million in the prior quarter, and up from $2.3 million in the third quarter a year ago.

    The Arizona, Colorado, and the Pacific Northwest mortgage expansion markets were responsible for 20% of Residential Mortgage’s $248 million total production in the third quarter of 2024, 22% of $182 million total production in the second quarter of 2024, and 8% of $153 million total production in the third quarter of 2023.

    The net change in fair value of mortgage servicing rights decreased mortgage banking income by $968,000 during the third quarter of 2024 compared to a decrease of $81,000 for the second quarter of 2024 and a decrease of $310,000 for the third quarter of 2023. Mortgage servicing revenue increased to $2.6 million in the third quarter of 2024 from $2.2 million in the prior quarter and from $2.4 million in the third quarter of 2023 due to an increase in production of Alaska Housing Finance Corporation (AHFC) mortgages, which contribute to servicing revenues at origination. In the third quarter of 2024, the Company’s servicing portfolio increased $64.8 million, which included $87.3 million in new mortgage loans, net of amortization and payoffs of $22.5 million as compared to a net increase of $41.8 million in the second quarter of 2024 and $58.2 million in the third quarter of 2023.

    As of September 30, 2024, Northrim serviced 4,187 loans in its $1.17 billion home-mortgage-servicing portfolio, a 6% increase compared to the $1.10 billion serviced as of the end of the second quarter of 2024, and a 19% increase from the $982.1 million serviced a year ago.

    The following tables provide highlights of the Home Mortgage Lending segment of Northrim:

      Three Months Ended  
        September       March 31,     December     September  
    (Dollars in thousands, except per share data)   30, 2024   June 30, 2024   2024     31, 2023     30, 2023  
    Mortgage commitments $77,591   $88,006   $56,208   $22,926   $50,128  
    Mortgage loans funded for sale $209,960   $152,339   $84,324   $79,742   $131,863  
    Mortgage loans funded for investment   38,087     29,175     17,403     27,114     21,585  
    Total mortgage loans funded $248,047   $181,514   $101,727   $106,856   $153,448  
    Mortgage loan refinances to total fundings   6 %   6 %   4 %   4 %   5 %
    Mortgage loans serviced for others $1,166,585   $1,101,800   $1,060,007   $1,044,516   $982,098  
    Net realized gains on mortgage loans sold $5,079   $3,188   $1,980   $1,462   $2,491  
    Change in fair value of mortgage loan commitments, net   60     391     386     (296 )   (289 )
    Total production revenue   5,139     3,579     2,366     1,166     2,202  
    Mortgage servicing revenue   2,583     2,164     1,561     2,180     2,396  
    Change in fair value of mortgage servicing rights:                              
    Due to changes in model inputs of assumptions1   (566 )   239     289     (707 )   —  
    Other2   (402 )   (320 )   (314 )   (301 )   (310 )
    Total mortgage servicing revenue, net   1,615     2,083     1,536     1,172     2,086  
    Other mortgage banking revenue   293     222     129     99     117  
    Total mortgage banking income $7,047   $5,884   $4,031   $2,437   $4,405  
               
    Net interest income $2,941   $2,775   $2,232   $2,276   $2,300  
    Provision (benefit) for credit losses   571     64     (48 )   —     —  
    Mortgage banking income   7,047     5,884     4,031     2,437     4,405  
    Other operating expense   7,643     6,697     6,086     5,477     5,951  
    Income (loss) before provision for income taxes   1,774     1,898     225     (764 )   754  
    Provision (benefit) for income taxes   497     532     63     (215 )   182  
    Net income (loss) $1,277   $1,366   $162     ($549 ) $572  
    Weighted average shares outstanding, diluted   5,583,055     5,558,580     5,554,930     5,578,491     5,624,906  
    Diluted earnings per share $0.23   $0.25   $0.03     ($0.10 ) $0.09  

    1Principally reflects changes in discount rates and prepayment speed assumptions, which are primarily affected by changes in interest rates.
    2Represents changes due to collection/realization of expected cash flows over time.

      Year-to-date
    (Dollars in thousands, except per share data) September
    30, 2024    		 September
    30, 2023
    Mortgage loans funded for sale $446,623   $296,412  
    Mortgage loans funded for investment   84,665     119,144  
    Total mortgage loans funded $531,288   $415,556  
    Mortgage loan refinances to total fundings   6 %   5 %
             
    Net realized gains on mortgage loans sold $10,247   $6,366  
    Change in fair value of mortgage loan commitments, net   837     194  
    Total production revenue   11,084     6,560  
    Mortgage servicing revenue   6,308     5,188  
    Change in fair value of mortgage servicing rights:            
    Due to changes in model inputs of assumptions1   (38 )   (215 )
    Other2   (1,036 )   (1,464 )
    Total mortgage servicing revenue, net   5,234     3,509  
    Other mortgage banking revenue   644     257  
    Total mortgage banking income $16,962   $10,326  
    Net interest income $7,948   $5,022  
    Provision for credit losses   587     —  
    Mortgage banking income   16,962     10,326  
    Other operating expense   20,426     18,020  
    Income before provision for income taxes   3,897     (2,672 )
    Provision for income taxes   1,092     (728 )
    Net (loss) income Home Mortgage Lending segment $2,805     ($1,944 )
    Weighted average shares outstanding, diluted   5,574,135     5,688,687  
    Diluted (loss) earnings per share $0.51     ($0.34 )


    1    Principally reflects changes in discount rates and prepayment speed assumptions, which are primarily affected by changes in interest rates.
    2Represents changes due to collection/realization of expected cash flows over time.

    Balance Sheet Review

    Northrim’s total assets were $2.96 billion at September 30, 2024, up 5% from the preceding quarter and up 6% from a year ago. Northrim’s loan-to-deposit ratio was 76% at September 30, 2024, consistent with 76% at June 30, 2024,
    and up from 71% at September 30, 2023.

    At September 30, 2024, our liquid assets, investments, and loans maturing within one year were $1.07 billion and our funds available for borrowing under our existing lines of credit were $641.7 million. Given these sources of liquidity and our expectations for customer demands for cash and for our operating cash needs, we believe our sources of liquidity to be sufficient for the foreseeable future.

    Average interest-earning assets were $2.67 billion in the third quarter of 2024, up 4% from $2.57 billion in the second quarter of 2024 and up 6% from $2.52 billion in the third quarter a year ago. The average yield on interest- earning assets was 5.92% in the third quarter of 2024, up from 5.83% in the preceding quarter and 5.48% in the third quarter a year ago.

    Average investment securities decreased to $619.0 million in the third quarter of 2024, compared to $640.0 million in the second quarter of 2024 and $715.8 million in the third quarter a year ago. The average net tax equivalent yield on the securities portfolio was 2.80% for the third quarter of 2024, down from 2.82% in the preceding quarter

    and up from 2.43% in the year ago quarter. The average estimated duration of the investment portfolio at September 30, 2024, was approximately 2.3 years compared to approximately 2.8 years at September 30, 2023. As of September 30, 2024, $105.1 million of available for sale securities with a weighted average yield of 0.61% are scheduled to mature in the next six months, $73.0 million with a weighted average yield of 2.48% are scheduled to mature in six months to one year, and $177.8 million with a weighted average yield of 1.31% are scheduled to mature in the following year, representing a total of $355.9 million or 13% of earning assets that are scheduled to mature in the next 24 months.

    Total unrealized losses, net of tax, on available for sale securities decreased by $7.6 million in the third quarter of 2024 resulting in total unrealized loss, net of tax, of $7.6 million compared to $15.2 million at June 30, 2024, and $26.5 million a year ago. The average maturity of the available for sale securities with the majority of the unrealized loss is 1.3 years. Total unrealized losses on held to maturity securities were $2.1 million at September 30, 2024, compared to $3.0 million at June 30, 2024, and $4.5 million a year ago.

    Average interest bearing deposits in other banks increased to $28.4 million in the third quarter of 2024 from $17.4 million in the second quarter of 2024 and decreased from $42.3 million in the third quarter of 2023, as deposit balances increased and cash was used to fund the loan growth and provide liquidity.

    Portfolio loans were $2.01 billion at September 30, 2024, up 7% from the preceding quarter and up 17% from a year ago. Portfolio loans, excluding consumer mortgage loans, were $1.76 billion at September 30, 2024, up $105.2 million or 6% from the preceding quarter and up 14% from a year ago. This increase was diversified throughout the loan portfolio including commercial real estate nonowner-occupied and multi-family loans increasing by $33.2 million, construction loans increasing by $31.4 million, and commercial real estate owner-occupied loans increasing $29.0 million from the preceding quarter. Average portfolio loans in the third quarter of 2024 were $1.93 billion, which was up 5% from the preceding quarter and up 14% from a year ago. Yields on average portfolio loans in the third quarter of 2024 increased to 6.91% from 6.87% in the second quarter and from 6.61% in the third quarter of 2023. The increase in the yield on portfolio loans in the third quarter of 2024 compared to the second quarter of 2024 and the third quarter a year ago is primarily due to loan repricing due to the increases in interest rates and new loans booked at higher rates due to changes in the interest rate environment. The yield on new portfolio loans, excluding consumer mortgage loans, was 7.43% in the third quarter of 2024 as compared to 8.26% in the second quarter of 2024 and 7.75% in the third quarter of 2023. The drop in yields on new loan production was largely related to the large volume of new commercial real estate versus commercial loans, as noted above, as well as slightly better credit quality of the loans originated in the third quarter of 2024.

    Alaskans continue to account for substantially all of Northrim’s deposit base. Total deposits were $2.63 billion at September 30, 2024, up 7% from $2.46 billion at June 30, 2024, and up 8% from $2.43 billion a year ago. “The increase in deposits in the third quarter of 2024 were consistent with our customers’ business cycles and a result of continued acquisition of new relationships,” said Ballard. At September 30, 2024, 73% of total deposits were held in business accounts and 27% of deposit balances were held in consumer accounts. Northrim had approximately 34,000 deposit customers with an average balance of $48,000 as of September 30, 2024. Northrim had 22 customers with balances over $10 million as of September 30, 2024, which accounted for $978.4 million, or 38%, of total deposits. Demand deposits increased by 8% from the prior quarter and decreased slightly year-over-year to
    $763.6 million at September 30, 2024. Demand deposits remained consistent at 29% of total deposits at both September 30, 2024 and June 30, 2024 down from 31% of total deposits at September 30, 2023. Average interest- bearing deposits were up 4% to $1.80 billion with an average cost of 2.24% in the third quarter of 2024, compared to $1.73 billion and an average cost of 2.21% in the second quarter of 2024, and up 11% compared to $1.62 billion and an average cost of 1.75% in the third quarter of 2023. Uninsured deposits totaled $1.12 billion or 43% of total deposits as of September 30, 2024 compared to $1.1 billion or 46% of total deposits as of December 31, 2022. Since interest rates began increasing in 2022, Northrim has taken a proactive, targeted approach to increase deposit rates.

    Shareholders’ equity was $260.1 million, or $47.27 book value per share, at September 30, 2024, compared to $247.2 million, or $44.93 book value per share, at June 30, 2024 and $225.3 million, or $40.60 book value per share, a year ago. Tangible book value per share* was $44.36 at September 30, 2024, compared to $42.03 at June

    30, 2024, and $37.72 per share a year ago. The increase in shareholders’ equity in the third quarter of 2024 as compared to the second quarter of 2024 was largely the result of earnings of $8.8 million and an increase in the fair value of the available for sale securities portfolio, which increased $7.6 million, net of tax, which were only partially offset by dividends paid of $3.4 million. The Company did not repurchase any shares of common stock in the third quarter of 2024 and has 110,000 shares remaining under the current share repurchase program as of September 30, 2024. Tangible common equity to tangible assets* was 8.28% as of September 30, 2024, compared to 8.24% as of June 30, 2024 and 7.54% as of September 30, 2023. Northrim continues to maintain capital levels in excess of the requirements to be categorized as “well-capitalized” with Tier 1 Capital to Risk Adjusted Assets of 11.53% at September 30, 2024, compared to 11.68% at June 30, 2024, and 11.67% at September 30, 2023.

    Asset Quality

    Northrim believes it has a consistent lending approach throughout economic cycles, which emphasizes appropriate loan-to-value ratios, adequate debt coverage ratios, and competent management.

    Nonperforming assets (“NPAs”) net of government guarantees were $5.3 million at September 30, 2024, up from $5.1 million at June 30, 2024 and $5.2 million a year ago. Of the NPAs at September 30, 2024, $3.0 million, or 61%, are nonaccrual loans related to three commercial relationships.

    Net adversely classified loans were $6.5 million at September 30, 2024, as compared to $7.1 million at June 30, 2024, and $7.3 million a year ago. Adversely classified loans are loans that Northrim has classified as substandard, doubtful, and loss, net of government guarantees. Net loan recoveries were $96,000 in the third quarter of 2024, compared to net loan recoveries of $26,000 in the second quarter of 2024, and net loan recoveries of $96,000 in the third quarter of 2023. Additionally, Northrim had 11 loan modifications to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty totaling $3.1 million, net of government guarantees in the third quarter of 2024.

    Northrim had $127.4 million, or 6% of portfolio loans, in the Healthcare sector, $110.4 million, or 5% of portfolio loans, in the Tourism sector, $96.6 million, or 5% of portfolio loans, in the Accommodations sector, $83.6 million, or 4% of portfolio loans, in the Fishing sector, $70.6 million, or 3% of portfolio loans, in the Aviation (non-tourism) sector, $67.7 million, or 3% of portfolio loans, in the Retail sector, and $53.1 million, or 3% in the Restaurants and Breweries sector as of September 30, 2024.

    Northrim estimates that $82.0 million, or approximately 4% of portfolio loans, had direct exposure to the oil and gas industry in Alaska, as of September 30, 2024, and $1.6 million of these loans are adversely classified. As of September 30, 2024, Northrim has an additional $29.7 million in unfunded commitments to companies with direct exposure to the oil and gas industry in Alaska, and no unfunded commitments on adversely classified loans. Northrim defines direct exposure to the oil and gas sector as loans to borrowers that provide oilfield services and other companies that have been identified as significantly reliant upon activity in Alaska related to the oil and gas industry, such as lodging, equipment rental, transportation and other logistics services specific to this industry.

    About Northrim BanCorp

    Northrim BanCorp, Inc. is the parent company of Northrim Bank, an Alaska-based community bank with 20 branches in Anchorage, Eagle River, the Matanuska Valley, the Kenai Peninsula, Juneau, Fairbanks, Nome, Kodiak, Ketchikan, and Sitka, serving 90% of Alaska’s population; and an asset-based lending division in Washington; and a wholly-owned mortgage brokerage company, Residential Mortgage Holding Company, LLC. The Bank differentiates itself with its detailed knowledge of Alaska’s economy and its “Customer First Service” philosophy. Pacific Wealth Advisors, LLC is an affiliated company of Northrim BanCorp.

    www.northrim.com

    Forward-Looking Statement

    This release may contain “forward-looking statements” as that term is defined for purposes of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These statements are, in effect, management’s attempt to predict future events, and thus are subject to various risks and uncertainties. Readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which reflect management’s views only as of the date hereof. All statements, other than statements of historical fact, regarding our financial position, business strategy, management’s plans and objectives for future operations are forward-looking statements. When used in this report, the words “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” and “intend” and words or phrases of similar meaning, as they relate to Northrim and its management are intended to help identify forward-looking statements. Although we believe that management’s expectations as reflected in forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot assure readers that those expectations will prove to be correct. Forward-looking statements, are subject to various risks and uncertainties that may cause our actual results to differ materially and adversely from our expectations as indicated in the forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include: potential further increases in interest rates; the value of securities held in our investment portfolio; the impact of the results of government initiatives on the regulatory landscape, natural resource extraction industries, and capital markets; the impact of declines in the value of commercial and residential real estate markets, high unemployment rates, inflationary pressures and slowdowns in economic growth; changes in banking regulation or actions by bank regulators; inflation, supply-chain constraints, and potential geopolitical instability, including the wars in Ukraine and the Middle East; financial stress on borrowers (consumers and businesses) as a result of higher rates or an uncertain economic environment; the general condition of, and changes in, the Alaska economy; our ability to maintain or expand our market share or net interest margin; the sufficiency of our provision for credit losses and the accuracy of the assumptions or estimates used in preparing our financial statements, including those related to current expected credit losses accounting guidance; our ability to maintain asset quality; our ability to implement our marketing and growth strategies; our ability to identify and address cyber-security risks, including security breaches, “denial of service attacks,” “hacking,” and identity theft; disease outbreaks; and our ability to execute our business plan. Further, actual results may be affected by competition on price and other factors with other financial institutions; customer acceptance of new products and services; the regulatory environment in which we operate; and general trends in the local, regional and national banking industry and economy. In addition, there are risks inherent in the banking industry relating to collectability of loans and changes in interest rates. Many of these risks, as well as other risks that may have a material adverse impact on our operations and business, are identified in the “Risk Factors” section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023, and from time to time are disclosed in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. However, you should be aware that these factors are not an exhaustive list, and you should not assume these are the only factors that may cause our actual results to differ from our expectations. These forward- looking statements are made only as of the date of this release, and Northrim does not undertake any obligation to release revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect events or conditions after the date of this release.

    References:

    https://www.bea.gov/

    http://almis.labor.state.ak.us/

    http://www.tax.alaska.gov/programs/oil/prevailing/ans.aspx

    http://www.tax.state.ak.us/

    www.mba.org

    https://www.alaskarealestate.com/MLSMember/RealEstateStatistics.aspx

    https://www.capitaliq.spglobal.com/web/client?auth=inherit&overridecdc=1&#markets/indexFinancials


    Income     Statement

    (Dollars in thousands, except per share data) Three Months Ended Year-t o-date
    (Unaudited) September 30, June 30, September 30, September 30, September 30,
        2024   2024     2023     2024     2023  
    Interest Income:                  
    Interest and fees on loans $34,863 $32,367   $29,097   $97,680   $79,104  
    Interest on portfolio investments   4,164   4,310     4,727     12,994     14,018  
    Interest on deposits in banks   389   232     584     1,459     2,901  
    Total interest income   39,416   36,909     34,408     112,133     96,023  
    Interest Expense:                            
    Interest expense on deposits   10,123   9,476     7,138     28,779     17,835  
    Interest expense on borrowings   451   380     920     1,012     1,664  
    Total interest expense   10,574   9,856     8,058     29,791     19,499  
    Net interest income   28,842   27,053     26,350     82,342     76,524  
    (Benefit) provision for credit losses   2,063   (120 )   1,190     2,092     2,957  
    Net interest income after provision for credit losses   26,779   27,173     25,160     80,250     73,567  
    Other Operating Income:                             
    Mortgage banking income   7,047   5,884     4,405     16,962     10,326  
    Bankcard fees   1,196   1,105     1,022     3,218     2,916  
    Purchased receivable income   1,033   1,242     1,180     3,620     3,175  
    Service charges on deposit accounts   605   572     550     1,726     1,512  
    Unrealized gain (loss) on marketable equity securities   576   (60 )   12     830     (445 )
    Other income   1,130   834     833     2,652     2,406  
    Total other operating income   11,587   9,577     8,002     29,008     19,890  
    Other Operating Expense:                            
    Salaries and other personnel expense   17,549   16,627     15,657     49,593     46,324  
    Data processing expense   2,618   2,601     2,589     7,878     7,321  
    Occupancy expense   1,911   1,843     1,857     5,716     5,611  
    Professional and outside services   903   726     803     2,384     2,326  
    Marketing expense   860   690     499     2,063     1,996  
    Insurance expense   596   692     640     2,067     1,844  
    OREO expense, net rental income and gains on sale   2   2     (784 )   (387 )   (766 )
    Intangible asset amortization expense   —   —     4     —     11  
    Other operating expense   2,289   2,013     1,631     6,246     5,521  
    Total other operating expense   26,728   25,194     22,896     75,560     70,188  
                                 
    Income before provision for income taxes   11,638   11,556     10,266     33,698     23,269  
    Provision for income taxes   2,813   2,536     1,892     7,654     4,488  
    Net income $8,825 $9,020   $8,374   $26,044   $18,781  
    Basic EPS $1.60 $1.64   $1.50   $4.73   $3.34  
    Diluted EPS $1.57 $1.62   $1.48   $4.67   $3.30  
    Weighted average shares outstanding, basic   5,501,943   5,500,588     5,569,238     5,500,703     5,630,948  
    Weighted average shares outstanding, diluted   5,583,055   5,558,580     5,624,906     5,574,135     5,688,687  
    Balance Sheet
    (Dollars in thousands)
    (Unaudited)    		 September 30, June 30, September 30,
        2024     2024     2023  
    Assets:            
    Cash and due from banks $42,805   $33,364   $31,276  
    Interest bearing deposits in other banks   60,071     21,058     79,952  
    Investment securities available for sale, at fair value   545,210     584,964     652,150  
    Investment securities held to maturity   36,750     36,750     36,750  
    Marketable equity securities, at fair value   12,957     12,381     10,615  
    Investment in Federal Home Loan Bank stock   4,318     4,929     6,334  
    Loans held for sale   97,937     85,926     63,151  
                       
    Portfolio loans   2,007,565     1,875,907     1,720,091  
    Allowance for credit losses, loans   (19,528 )   (17,694 )   (16,491 )
    Net portfolio loans   1,988,037     1,858,213     1,703,600  
    Purchased receivables, net   23,564     25,722     34,578  
    Mortgage servicing rights, at fair value   21,570     21,077     19,396  
    Other real estate owned, net   —     —     150  
    Premises and equipment, net   39,625     40,393     40,920  
    Lease right of use asset   7,616     8,244     9,673  
    Goodwill and intangible assets   15,967     15,967     15,973  
    Other assets   66,965     72,680     85,671  
    Total assets $2,963,392   $2,821,668   $2,790,189  
    Liabilities:            
    Demand deposits $763,595   $704,471   $764,647  
    Interest-bearing demand   979,238     906,010     875,814  
    Savings deposits   245,043     238,156     265,799  
    Money market deposits   201,821     195,159     230,814  
    Time deposits   435,870     420,010     290,856  
    Total deposits   2,625,567     2,463,806     2,427,930  
    Other borrowings   13,354     43,961     63,781  
    Junior subordinated debentures   10,310     10,310     10,310  
    Lease liability   7,635     8,269     9,673  
    Other liabilities   46,476     48,122     53,236  
    Total liabilities   2,703,342     2,574,468     2,564,930  
    Shareholders’ Equity:                  
    Total shareholders’ equity   260,050     247,200     225,259  
    Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity $2,963,392   $2,821,668   $2,790,189  

    Additional Financial Information
    (Dollars in thousands)
    (Unaudited)

    Composition of Portfolio Loans

        September 30,
    2024    		 June 30, 2024 March 31, 2024 December 31,
    2023    		 September 30,
    2023
      Balance % of
    total    		 Balance % of
    total    		 Balance % of
    total    		 Balance % of
    total    		 Balance % of
    total
    Commercial loans $492,414   24 % $495,781   26 % $475,220   26 % $486,057   27 % $492,145   28 %
    Commercial real estate:                    
    Owner occupied properties   412,827   20 %   383,832   20 %   372,507   20 %   368,357   20 %   359,019   21 %
    Nonowner occupied and                    
    multifamily properties   584,302   31 %   551,130   30 %   529,904   30 %   519,115   30 %   509,939   30 %
    Residential real estate:                    
    1-4 family properties                    
    secured by first liens   248,514   12 %   222,026   12 %   218,552   12 %   203,534   11 %   180,719   10 %
    1-4 family properties                    
    secured by junior liens &                    
    revolving secured by first liens   45,262   2 %   41,258   2 %   35,460   2 %   33,783   2 %   27,342   2 %
    1-4 family construction   39,794   2 %   29,510   2 %   27,751   2 %   31,239   2 %   32,374   2 %
    Construction loans   185,362   9 %   154,009   8 %   153,537   8 %   149,788   8 %   120,909   7 %
    Consumer loans   7,836   — %   6,679   — %   6,444   — %   6,180   — %   5,930   — %
    Subtotal   2,016,311       1,884,225       1,819,375       1,798,053       1,728,377    
    Unearned loan fees, net   (8,746 )     (8,318 )     (8,240 )     (8,556 )     (8,286 )  
    Total portfolio loans $2,007,565     $1,875,907     $1,811,135     $1,789,497     $1,720,091    


    Composition     of Deposits

      September 30, 2024 June 30, 2024 March 31, 2024 December 31, 2023 September 30, 2023
      Balance % of
    total    		 Balance % of
    total    		 Balance % of
    total    		 Balance % of
    total    		 Balance % of
    total
    Demand deposits $763,595 29 % $704,471 29 % $714,244 29 % $749,683 31 % $764,647 31 %
    Interest-bearing demand   979,238 37 %   906,010 36 %   889,581 37 %   927,291 37 %   875,814 36 %
    Savings deposits   245,043 9 %   238,156 10 %   246,902 10 %   255,338 10 %   265,799 11 %
    Money market deposits   201,821 8 %   195,159 8 %   209,785 9 %   221,492 9 %   230,814 10 %
    Time deposits   435,870 17 %   420,010 17 %   373,571 15 %   331,251 13 %   290,856 12 %
    Total deposits $2,625,567   $2,463,806   $2,434,083   $2,485,055   $2,427,930  

    Additional Financial Information
    (Dollars in thousands)
    (Unaudited)

    Asset Quality   

        September 30,
    2024     		   June 30,
    2024    		   September 30,
    2023    		  
    Nonaccrual loans $4,944   $4,830   $6,492  
    Loans 90 days past due and accruing   17   17   28  
    Total nonperforming loans   4,961   4,847   6,520  
    Nonperforming loans guaranteed by government   —   —   (1,455)  
    Net nonperforming loans   4,961   4,847   5,065  
    Other real estate owned —   —   150  
    Repossessed assets 297   297   —  
    Net nonperforming assets $5,258   $5,144   $5,215  
    Nonperforming loans, net of government guarantees / portfolio loans   0.25 %  0.26 % 0.29 %
    Nonperforming loans, net of government guarantees / portfolio loans, net of government guarantees   0.26 % 0.28 % 0.31 %
    Nonperforming assets, net of government guarantees / total assets   0.18 % 0.18 %  0.19 %
    Nonperforming assets, net of government guarantees / total assets net of government guarantees   0.19 % 0.19 %  0.19 %
    Adversely classified loans, net of government guarantees $6,503   $7,068   $7,250  
    Special mention loans, net of government guarantees $9,641   $8,902   $5,457  
    Loans 30-89 days past due and accruing, net of government guarantees / portfolio loans   0.08 % 0.03 % — % 
    Loans 30-89 days past due and accruing, net of government guarantees / portfolio loans, net of government guarantees   0.09 % 0.04 %  — %
    Allowance for credit losses / portfolio loans   0.97 %  0.94 % 0.96 %
    Allowance for credit losses / portfolio loans, net of government guarantees   1.04 %  1.01 %  1.02 %
    Allowance for credit losses / nonperforming loans, net of government guarantees   394 % 365 %  326 %
    Gross loan charge-offs for the quarter $15   $—   $91  
    Gross loan recoveries for the quarter   ($111)   ($26)   ($187)  
    Net loan (recoveries) charge-offs for the quarter   ($96)   ($26)   ($96)  
    Net loan charge-offs (recoveries) year-to-date   ($164)   ($68)   ($134)  
    Net loan charge-offs (recoveries) for the quarter / average loans, for the quarter   —  %  —  %  (0.01) % 
    Net loan charge-offs (recoveries) year-to-date / average loans, year-to-date annualized   (0.01) %  (0.01)  %  (0.01) % 
           

    Additional Financial Information
    (Dollars in thousands)
    (Unaudited)

    Average Balances, Yields, and Rates                

      Three Months Ended
      September 30, 2024   June 30, 2024   September 30, 2023  
      Average Balance Average
    Tax
    Equivalent
    Yield/Rate    		 Average
    Balance    		 Average
    Tax
    Equivalent
    Yield/Rate    		 Average
    Balance    		 Average
    Tax
    Equivalent
    Yield/Rate
    Assets            
    Interest bearing deposits in other banks $ 28,409   5.28 % $ 17,352   5.27 % $ 42,273   5.39 %
    Portfolio investments   619,012   2.80 %   639,980   2.82 %   715,767   2.43 %
    Loans held for sale   93,689   6.20 %   65,102   6.08 %   62,350   6.34 %
    Portfolio loans   1,933,181   6.91 %   1,845,832   6.87 %   1,695,736   6.61 %
    Total interest-earning assets   2,674,291   5.92 %   2,568,266   5.83 %   2,516,126   5.48 %
    Nonearning assets   196,266       204,509       205,770    
    Total assets $ 2,870,557     $ 2,772,775     $ 2,721,896    

    Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity

    		            
    Interest-bearing deposits $ 1,796,107   2.24 % $ 1,725,013   2.21 % $ 1,619,478   1.75 %
    Borrowings   43,555   4.07 %   38,390   3.92 %   76,681   4.73 %
    Total interest-bearing liabilities   1,839,662   2.29 %   1,763,403   2.25 %   1,696,159   1.88 %
    Noninterest-bearing demand deposits   722,000       706,339       747,147    
    Other liabilities   52,387       58,549       52,078    
    Shareholders’ equity   256,508       244,484       226,512    
    Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity $ 2,870,557     $ 2,772,775     $ 2,721,896    
    Net spread   3.63 %   3.58 %   3.60 %
    NIM   4.29 %   4.24 %   4.15 %
    NIMTE*   4.35 %   4.30 %   4.21 %
    Cost of funds   1.64 %   1.60 %   1.31 %
    Average portfolio loans to average            
    interest-earning assets   72.29 %     71.87 %     67.39 %  
    Average portfolio loans to average total deposits   76.77 %     75.92 %     71.65 %  
    Average non-interest deposits to average            
    total deposits   28.67 %     29.05 %     31.57 %  
    Average interest-earning assets to average            
    interest-bearing liabilities   145.37 %     145.64 %     148.34 %  

    Additional Financial Information
    (Dollars in thousands) (Unaudited)

    Average Balances, Yields, and Rates        

      Year-to-date
      September 30, 2024   September 30, 2023
      Average Average
    Tax Equivalent    		   Average Average
    Tax Equivalent
    Balance Yield/Rate   Balance Yield/Rate
    Assets          
    Interest bearing deposits in other banks $35,747   5.34 %   $79,362   4.82 %
    Portfolio investments   643,221   2.82 %     723,693   2.41 %
    Loans held for sale   63,917   6.14 %     40,433   6.06 %
    Portfolio loans   1,857,756   6.85 %     1,608,293   6.46 %
    Total interest-earning assets   2,600,641   5.81 %     2,451,781   5.30 %
    Nonearning assets   200,619         192,430    
    Total assets $2,801,260       $2,644,211    

    Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity

    		          
    Interest-bearing deposits $1,751,179   2.20 %   $1,577,308   1.51 %
    Borrowings   35,327   3.76 %     52,075   4.23 %
    Total interest-bearing liabilities   1,786,506   2.23 %     1,629,383   1.60 %
    Noninterest-bearing demand deposits   711,197         746,251    
    Other liabilities   57,097         42,596    
    Shareholders’ equity   246,460         225,981    
    Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity $2,801,260       $2,644,211    
    Net spread   3.58 %     3.70 %
    NIM   4.23 %     4.17 %
    NIMTE*   4.29 %     4.24 %
    Cost of funds   1.59 %     1.10 %
    Average portfolio loans to average interest-earning assets   71.43 %       65.60 %  
    Average portfolio loans to average total deposits   75.45 %       69.22 %  
    Average non-interest deposits to average total deposits   28.88 %       32.12 %  
    Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities   145.57 %       150.47 %  

    Additional Financial Information
    (Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
    (Unaudited)

    Capital Data (At quarter end)

         
                September 30, 2024       June 30, 2024   September 30, 2023
    Book value per share           $47.27   $44.93   $40.60  
    Tangible book value per share*           $44.36   $42.03   $37.72  
    Total shareholders’ equity/total assets           8.78 %  8.76 %    8.07  %
    Tangible Common Equity/Tangible Assets*           8.28 %  8.24 %    7.54  %
    Tier 1 Capital / Risk Adjusted Assets           11.53 %  11.68 %    11.67  %
    Total Capital / Risk Adjusted Assets           12.50 %  12.58 %    12.58  %
    Tier 1 Capital / Average Assets           9.08 %  9.17 %    9.02  %
    Shares outstanding           5,501,943   5,501,562     5,548,436  
    Total unrealized loss on AFS debt securities, net of income taxes           ($7,617)   ($15,197)     ($26,526 )
    Total unrealized gain on derivatives and hedging activities, net of
    income taxes    		           $863   $1,212   $1,485  
         
    Profitability Ratios    
        September 30, 
    2024    		   June 30,
    2024    		   March 31, 
    2024    		   December 31, 2023   September 30,
    2023

    For the quarter:

    		    
    NIM         4.29%   4.24%   4.16%   4.06%     4.15%  
    NIMTE*         4.35%   4.30%   4.22%   4.12%     4.21%  
    Efficiency ratio         66.11%   68.78%   68.93%   72.21%     66.64%  
    Return on average assets         1.22%   1.31%   1.19%   0.93%     1.22%  
    Return on average equity         13.69%   14.84%   13.84%   11.36%     14.67%  
      September 30,   September 30,  
    2024   2023
    Year-to-date:      
    NIM 4.23 % 4.17 %
    NIMTE* 4.29 % 4.24 %
    Efficiency ratio 67.86 % 72.79 %
    Return on average assets 1.24 % 0.95 %
    Return on average equity 14.12 % 11.11 %


    *Non-GAAP     Financial Measures
    (Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data) (Unaudited)

    Non-GAAP financial measures have inherent limitations, are not required to be uniformly applied, and are not audited. Although we believe these non-GAAP financial measures are frequently used by stakeholders in the evaluation of the Company, they have limitations as analytical tools and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of results as reported under GAAP.

    Net interest margin on a tax equivalent basis

    Net interest margin on a tax equivalent basis (“NIMTE”) is a non-GAAP performance measurement in which interest income on non-taxable investments and loans is presented on a tax equivalent basis using a combined federal and state statutory rate of 28.43% in both 2024 and 2023. The most comparable GAAP measure is net interest margin and the following table sets forth the reconciliation of NIMTE to net interest margin for the periods indicated.

      Three Months Ended
        September 30,       March 31,     December     September 30,  
        2024   June 30, 2024   2024     31, 2023     2023  
    Net interest income $28,842   $27,053   $26,447   $26,732   $26,350  
    Divided by average interest-bearing assets   2,674,291     2,568,266     2,558,558     2,612,297     2,516,126  
    Net interest margin (“NIM”)2   4.29 %   4.24 %   4.16 %   4.06 %   4.15 %
    Net interest income $28,842   $27,053   $26,447   $26,732   $26,350  
    Plus: reduction in tax expense related to
    tax-exempt interest income    		   385     378     379     374     373  
        $29,227     $27,431     $26,826     $27,106     $26,723  
    Divided by average interest-bearing assets NIMTE2   2,674,291     2,568,266     2,558,558     2,612,297     2,516,126  
        4.35 %   4.30 %   4.22 %   4.12 %   4.21 %
      Year-to-date
      September 30, September 30,
      2024     2023  
    Net interest income $82,342   $76,524  
    Divided by average interest-bearing assets   2,600,641     2,451,781  
    Net interest margin (“NIM”)3   4.23 %   4.17 %
    Net interest income
    Plus: reduction in tax expense related to    		 $82,342   $76,524  
    tax-exempt interest income   1,142     1,202  
      $83,484   $77,726  
    Divided by average interest-bearing assets   2,600,641     2,451,781  
    NIMTE3   4.29 %   4.24 %


    2    Calculated using actual days in the quarter divided by 366 for the quarters ended in 2024 and 365 for the quarters ended in 2023, respectively.

    3Calculated using actual days in the year divided by 366 for year-to-date period in 2024 and 365 for year-to-date period in 2023, respectively.


    *Non-GAAP Financial Measures
    (Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)
    (Unaudited)

    Tangible Book Value Per Share

    Tangible book value per share is a non-GAAP measure defined as shareholders’ equity, less intangible assets, divided by shares outstanding. The most comparable GAAP measure is book value per share and the following table sets forth the reconciliation of tangible book value per share and book value per share for the periods indicated.

        September 30, 
    2024    		   June 30, 2024   March 31, 
    2024    		   December
    31, 2023    		   September 30,
    2023
    Total shareholders’ equity $260,050 $247,200 $239,327 $234,718 $225,259
    Divided by shares outstanding   5,502   5,502   5,500   5,513   5,548
    Book value per share $47.27 $44.93 $43.52 $42.57 $40.60
        September 30, 
    2024    		   June 30, 2024   March 31, 
    2024    		   December
    31, 2023    		   September 30,
    2023
    Total shareholders’ equity $260,050 $247,200 $239,327 $234,718 $225,259
    Less: goodwill and intangible assets   15,967   15,967   15,967   15,967   15,973
      $244,083 $231,233 $223,360 $218,751 $209,286
    Divided by shares outstanding   5,502   5,502   5,500   5,513   5,548
    Tangible book value per share $44.36 $42.03 $40.61 $39.68 $37.72


    Tangible     Common Equity to Tangible Assets

    Tangible common equity to tangible assets is a non-GAAP ratio that represents total equity less goodwill and intangible assets divided by total assets less goodwill and intangible assets. The most comparable GAAP measure of shareholders’ equity to total assets is calculated by dividing total shareholders’ equity by total assets and the following table sets forth the reconciliation of tangible common equity to tangible assets and shareholders’ equity to total assets.

    Northrim BanCorp, Inc. September 30,     March 31,   December September 30,
      2024 June 30, 2024   2024     31, 2023     2023  
    Total shareholders’ equity $260,050 $247,200 $239,327   $234,718   $225,259  
    Total assets 2,963,392 2,821,668   2,759,560     2,807,497     2,790,189  
    Total shareholders’ equity to total assets 8.78 % 8.76 %   8.67 %   8.36 %   8.07 %
    Northrim BanCorp, Inc. September 30,   March 31, December September 30,
      2024 June 30, 2024   2024     31, 2023     2023  
    Total shareholders’ equity $260,050 $247,200 $239,327   $234,718   $225,259  
    Less: goodwill and other intangible assets, net 15,967 15,967   15,967     15,967     15,973  
    Tangible common shareholders’ equity $244,083 $231,233 $223,360   $218,751   $209,286  
    Total assets $2,963,392 $2,821,668 $2,759,560   $2,807,497   $2,790,189  
    Less: goodwill and other intangible assets, net 15,967 15,967   15,967     15,967     15,973  
    Tangible assets $2,947,425 $2,805,701 $2,743,593   $2,791,530   $2,774,216  
    Tangible common equity ratio 8.28 % 8.24 %   8.14 %   7.84 %   7.54 %

    Note Transmitted on GlobeNewswire on October 23, 2024, at 2:30 pm Alaska Standard Time.

       
    Contact: Mike Huston, President, CEO, and COO
      (907) 261-8750
      Jed Ballard, Chief Financial Officer
      (907) 261-3539

    The MIL Network –

  • MIL-OSI Economics: Transcript of Fiscal Monitor October 2024 Press Briefing

    Source: International Monetary Fund

    October 23, 2024

    SPEAKERS:
     Vitor Gaspar, Director, Fiscal Affairs Department
    Era Dabla‑Norris, Deputy Director, Fiscal Affairs Department
    Davide Furceri, Division Chief, Fiscal Affairs Department
    Tatiana Mossot, Moderator, Senior Communications Officer

    The Moderator (Ms. Mossot): Good morning, good afternoon, and good evening to our viewers around the world. I am Tatiana Mossot, the IMF Communications Department, and I will be your host for today’s press briefing on the Annual Meetings 2024 Fiscal Monitor, “Putting a Lead on Public Debt.” I am pleased to introduce this morning the Director of the Fiscal Affairs Department, Vitor Gaspar. He is joined by Era Dabla‑Norris, Deputy Director of the Fiscal Affairs Department, and Davide Furceri, who is the Division Chief of the Fiscal Affairs Department. Good morning, Vitor, Era, Davide.

    Before taking your questions, let me kick‑start our briefing by turning to you, Vitor, for your opening remarks. Vitor, the floor is yours.

    Mr. Gaspar: Thank you so much, Tatiana. Good morning, everybody. Thank you all for your interest in the Fiscal Monitor, covering fiscal policies all around the world. Deficits are high and global public debt is very high, rising, and risky. Global public debt is projected to go above $100 trillion this year. At the current pace, the global debt‑to‑GDP ratio will approach 100 percent by the end of the decade, rising above the pandemic peak. But the message of high and rising debt masks considerable diversity across countries. I will distinguish three groups.

    Public debt is higher and projected to grow faster than pre‑pandemic in about one third of the countries. This includes not only the largest economies, China and the United States, but also other large countries such as Brazil, France, Italy, South Africa, and the United Kingdom, representing in total about 70 percent of global GDP.

    In another one third of the countries, public debt is higher but projected to grow slower or decline compared with pre‑pandemic.

    In the rest of the world, debt is lower than pre‑pandemic. The Fiscal Monitor makes the case that public debt risks are elevated, and prospects are worse than they look. The Fiscal Monitor presents a novel framework, debt at risk, that illustrates risks around the most likely debt projection at various time horizons. Here we concentrate on the next 3 years.

    Our analysis shows that risks to public debt projections are tilted to the upside. In a severe adverse scenario, public debt would be 20 percentage points of GDP above the baseline projection. In most countries, fiscal plans that governments have put in place are insufficient to deliver stable or declining public debt ratios with a high degree of confidence. Additional efforts are necessary. Delaying adjustment is costly and risky. Kicking the can down the road will not do. The time to act is now. The likelihood of a soft landing has increased. Monetary policy has already started to ease in major economies. Unemployment is low in many countries. And, therefore, given these circumstances, most economies are well‑positioned to deal with fiscal adjustment.

    But it does matter how it is done. While the specific circumstances depend on—while specifics depend on country circumstances, the Fiscal Monitor and earlier IMF work provide useful pointers. For example, countries should avoid cuts in public investment. This can have severe effects on growth. Good governance and transparency improve the prospects of public understanding and social acceptance of fiscal reforms.

    Countries that are sufficiently away from debt distress should adjust in a sustained and gradual way to contain debt vulnerabilities without unnecessary adverse effect on growth and employment. However, in countries in debt distress or at high risk of debt distress, timely and frontloaded decisive action to control public debt or even debt restructuring may be necessary. Everywhere, fiscal policy, as structural policy, can make a substantial contribution to growth and jobs.

    What is the bottom line? Public debt is very high, rising, and risky. The time is now to pivot towards a gradual, sustained, and people‑focused fiscal adjustment.

    My colleagues and I are ready to answer your questions. Thank you for your attention and interest.

    The Moderator (Ms. Mossot): Thank you, Vitor. So, we will open the floor for questions. Thank you.

    Question: Good morning, given your findings on the increasing trend of spending across the political spectrum, how do governments then plan to balance the urgent need, as you stated, for investment in critical areas like healthcare and climate adaptation with the risks of what you also stated, overly optimistic debt projections?

    Ms. Dabla‑Norris: Thank you, global debt is very high, 100 trillion this year and rising. And debt risks, all the ones you mentioned, are also very elevated. So, policymakers are now facing a fundamental policy trilemma, to maintain debt sustainability, amid very high levels of debt in some countries, to accommodate the spending pressures for climate adaptation, for development goals, for population aging, and at the same time to garner support that is needed for reforms. This is why we are calling for a strategic pivot in public finances for countries to put their public finances in order. And why is this important? Because this can help create room that is needed for the priority spending. It can create fiscal space to combat future shocks that will surely come. And it can also help sustain long‑term growth.

    What this means is that for some countries, a very decisive implementation of reforms is needed now, under current plans. For many others, an additional adjustment is required that needs to be gradual but sustained. And yet for others with very high debt levels that are rising, a more frontloaded adjustment will be needed.

    These efforts, these fiscal efforts need to be people‑focused, because you want to balance the trade‑off between these measures adversely impacting growth and inequality. So, here it is important to seek to preserve public spending. It is important to seek to preserve social spending. And improving the quality, the composition, the efficiency of government spending can ensure that every dollar that is spent has maximum impact. It creates room for other types of spending without adding to debt pressures.

    Mobilizing revenues, setting up broad‑based and fair tax systems can allow countries to collect revenues to meet their spending needs. And this is particularly important in the case of emerging market and developing economies, which have considerable untapped tax potential.

    But I think it is also important to note that policymakers need to build the trust that taxpayer’s resources that are being collected will be well‑spent. This is why we are emphasizing strengthening governance, improving fiscal frameworks to build that trust that is needed for reforms.

    Ms. Mossot: We will go to this side of the room. The gentleman in the fourth row.

    Question: Thank you for doing this. I was wondering if you could please drive us a bit further to the debt‑at‑risk framework. Thank you.

    Mr. Furceri: Thank you. The debt risk is a framework that links current macroeconomic, financial, and political conditions to the entire spectrum of the future debt outcomes. So, in some sense it goes beyond the point focus that we typically provide, and it enables economic policymakers to first quantify what are the risks surrounding the debt projections and, second, what are the sources of this risk.

    The current framework estimates that in a severely adverse scenario but plausible, debt to GDP could be 20 percentage points higher in the next 3 years than currently projected. Why is this the case? This is because there are risks related to weaker growth, tighter financial conditions, as well as economic and political uncertainty.

    Another point that the Fiscal Monitor makes is that beyond this global level, the debt to risk associated to the global level, there is significant heterogeneities across countries. For example, in the case of advanced economies, our estimates of data risk are about 135 percent to GDP by 2026. This is a high level. It is lower than what we observed during the peak of the pandemic, but it is high, and it indeed is even higher than what we observed during the Global Financial Crisis.

    In the case of emerging market economies, what we see is that debt risk is increasing even compared to the pandemic and our estimate is about 88 percentage points of GDP.

    Summarizing, we think that this is a framework that could be useful to quantify a risk, identify the sources, and then make a response to this risk.

    Ms. Mossot: We will take another question in the room before going online.

    Question: Thank very much. I would like to know, Vitor, how can fiscal governance be strengthened to ensure long‑term fiscal adjustments, and while at it, what are the risks if fiscal adjustments are delayed, and how would that affect global financial markets? My second question, what lessons can be learned from countries that have successfully managed high debt levels in the past and how can transparency and accountability in public finance be improved to build trust and ensure effective debt management?

    Mr. Gaspar: Thank you so much. I will start with the timing. So I have already emphasized that delaying adjustment is costly and risky. You come from Ghana. If you allow me to place your question in the context of the sub‑Saharan Africa more broadly. I would argue that building fiscal space is not only crucial to limit public debt risks, but in many countries in sub‑Saharan Africa, it is key to enable this state to play its full role in development, which is, of course, a very important priority in the region.

    You asked about lessons from experience. I would say that fiscal adjustment should be timely. It should be decisive. It should be well‑designed. And it should be effectively communicated. And you have pointers on all of this in the Fiscal Monitor.

    You asked a very important question on governance. I would put it together with transparency and accountability. Era has already commented on why it is so important from a political viewpoint, but we have been working in this area for many years. For example, the IMF has a code on fiscal transparency that is extremely interesting. Something that also came up in a seminar that I participated in yesterday is the opportunities afforded by technology to make progress on governance. One of the speakers from India introduced this idea of three Ts that I found very inspiring. The three Ts are technology that is used to promote transparency. And if you have technology and transparency, you should expect to gain trust. And if you have trust, you have the citizens behind the government and, therefore, even willing to pay taxes, not necessarily happily, but in a quasi-voluntary way.

    Ms. Mossot: Thank you, Vitor. We have a question from Forbes, Mexico.” I have a question in countries like Mexico where fiscal consolidation is necessary. What are the biggest risks of this consolidation and how could it boost economic growth?” This is a question for Era.

    Ms. Dabla‑Norris: So, as we have said more generally, the design of fiscal adjustment is what really matters. And there is a right way to do it, and there are many wrong ways to do it.

    In the Fiscal Monitor, we illustrate how countries can undertake fiscal adjustment in a way that is what we call people focused. By that I mean, we want to trade off the negative impacts of the adjustment on growth and on inequality. And we do this by looking at different types of fiscal instruments. And different instruments have very different impacts. So, for example, progressive taxes have a very different impact on consumption and incentives to work and save as compared to other types of taxation.

    Similarly, cutting public investment has both negative short‑run effects on growth and wages, as well as more medium‑term impacts on growth. Cutting regressive energy subsidies similarly have much less of a deleterious impact on income and the consumption of the poor.

    So depending upon the country context, depending upon whether there is scope to raise revenues in non‑distortionary ways, depending upon the nature and the composition of public spending, there are ways for countries to do fiscal adjustment in a manner that is growth‑friendly and people‑friendly.

    Ms. Mossot: So, the last one we have from online is for you, Davide. “The report suggests that low‑income development countries should build tax capacity and improve spending efficiency. Given the high levels of debt and limited resources in these countries, how realistic are these recommendations without substantial international financial support?”

    Mr. Furceri: Indeed, many developing countries face significant pressing spending needs. For sustained development goals, to achieve climate goals, our estimate in the previous Fiscal Monitor suggests that the envelope of these spending needs could be as much as high as 16 percent of GDP.

    So, in this context, one important policy action is to increase revenue through revenue mobilization. Now, it is important that this revenue mobilization strategy is guided by the principle that make the tax system more efficient, more equitable, and more progressive. So policies could be, for example, to reduce informalities, broaden the tax base, increase efficiency in revenue collections, as well as progressivity.

    In the report, we also make the point that improving fiscal institutions, as also Era mentioned, is key to garner public support and to make sure that the debt system is indeed efficient.

    There is also policy on the spending side, improving the quality, the composition, and the efficiency spending to make sure that each dollar spent is well spent, is spent on the key priority areas, and maximizing it.

    Now, there are countries that will need help. The IMF as in the past years and as always has provided significant advice to countries from policy support, policy advice but also financing support. Just to give a number, over the past 4 years, about $60 billion of funding has been provided to African economies to help their challenge. And important, the IMF is also providing a variety of capacity development to support, including exactly in this area, for example, increase Public Finance Management, improve taxation, revenue mobilization, as well as a new area that are developing that are becoming more and more important, such as climate change.

    The Moderator (Ms. Mossot): Thank you. The gentleman with his book in the hand.

    Question: Thank you. You mentioned in the report that developed economies, including the United Kingdom, face risks if they do not bring debt down. We have a budget next week. Perhaps you could tell us what are those risks if the U.K. does not address its debt position quickly?

    Mr. Gaspar: So, when we think about the United Kingdom, the United Kingdom is one of the countries that I listed where debt is substantially higher than it was projected pre‑pandemic. It is also one of the countries where debt is projected to increase over time, albeit at a declining pace.

    If I were to give you my concern about the U.K., I would use what Kristalina Georgieva, the Managing Director of the Fund, emphasizes a theme through these Annual Meetings, the combination of high debt and low growth. For the case of the United Kingdom, I would put it as follows. The United Kingdom is living with interest rates that are close to U.S. interest rates, but it is also living with growth rates that are not close to U.S. growth rates. And that leads to a theme that has been amply debated in the United Kingdom, which is the importance of public investment.

    In the United Kingdom, as in many other advanced economies, public investment as a percentage of GDP has been trending down. And given challenges associated with the energy transition, new technologies, technological innovation, and much else, public investment is badly needed. The Fiscal Monitor emphasizes that public investment should be protected in the framework of a set of rules and budgetary procedures that foster sound macroeconomic performance. The fact that that debate is very much at the center of the debate in the United Kingdom right now is very much welcome.

    Ms. Mossot: We will take another question on this side. The lady in green.

    Question: Thank you. After 3 years of consolidation, fiscal deficits are widening in the western Balkans. The public expenditures are increasing but more on social debt—more on social spendings than on capital spendings. How do you evaluate the economic situation in this region?

    Ms. Dabla‑Norris: So, in western Balkans as a whole, growth has picked up since 2023, although there are differences across countries. For example, in North Macedonia, growth is projected to be 2.2 percent in 2024, down from 2.7 percent in 2023. But for the region, the growth momentum is expected to continue in 2025.

    Now, when it comes to inflation, we see that headline inflation continues to ease throughout the region, but core inflation remains stubbornly high in some countries.

    In terms of fiscal and debt, the differential—the interest and growth differential for the region is projected to remain negative over the medium term. And this is a good thing because it is favorable to debt dynamics, but this gap is closing. It is narrowing over time.

    So, what is important at this juncture for these countries is to sustainably lift their growth prospects. And the IMF has spoken at length about the importance of structural and fiscal structural reforms that are needed to improve the composition of spending, to lift public investment sustainably and to undertake the labor and product market reforms that are required to sustainably boost productivity.

    Ms. Mossot: Thank you. Back to the center of the room.

    Question: Thanks for taking my question. I wanted to ask about France. Do you believe that the French government’s plans to return to a budget deficit of less than 3 percent by 2029 is realistic, given the size of the deficit you project for France this year?

    Mr. Gaspar: So, when it comes to France, we have a country that is also in the group of countries where debt is considerably higher than pre‑pandemic. At this point in time, in our projections, the debt‑to‑GDP ratio in France is projected to increase by about 2 percentage points every year. So, given this path, we recommend in the case of France not only fiscal adjustment but fiscal adjustment that is appropriately frontloaded to enable France to credibly put public debt under control and inside the European framework.

    That is completely in line with our general recommendation because the European framework allows for a country‑specific path. It allows for risks to be considered. It allows for the impact of the investment and structural reform to be internalized through an adjustment period that varies, according to cases, from 5 to 7 years.

    We do believe that the government in France has presented ideas, proposals that move in the right direction, but we are waiting for more clarity coming from actual enacted measures in France.

    Ms. Mossot: Another one here, the lady in blue there.

    Question: Thank you. May I have an insight about public debt in Tunisia and reasons beyond not mentioning it in your report? Thank you.

    Mr. Furceri: For the specific numbers for Tunisia, I would defer to the regional press briefs that is coming in the coming days. What I would like to point out, that one of the challenges that we see in many countries in North Africa, it also relates with the untargeted subsidies. And one point that we make in the report is that, also as Era mentioned, that when you think about how to recalibrate spending, it is important to preserve public investment. It is important to present targeted transfers for those that are most vulnerable, and to recalibrate the spending, for example, from away from high wage compensation when this is not the case, and untargeted subsidies.

    Ms. Mossot: Thank you. This side, second row, the gentleman.

    Question: I just had a question about the U.S. election. As you know, both candidates are offering many tax breaks, no taxes on tips, no tax on social security on the Trump side. These would add to the deficit of the U.S. on the Trump side as much as $7 and a half trillion over 10 years. Some estimates more than 10 trillion. Kamala Harris’ plans would call for less debt because she would raise taxes in some cases. But I am just wondering, the worse‑case scenario, how concerned are you about the amount of debt that the U.S. could be adding here? It seems to be the opposite of what the IMF has been recommending for a long time. Do you have concerns about financial markets taking matters into their own hands and imposing some discipline?

    Mr. Gaspar: Thanks, I am clearly not commenting on specific elections or political platforms, but I point to you that the Fiscal Monitor in the spring was dedicated to the great election year, and there we do make a number of comments about the relevance of politics for fiscal policy. And Era, has very interesting research where she documents that political platforms on the left and on the right all around the world have turned in favor of fiscal support and fiscal expansion. And that makes the job of the Ministers of Finance around the world and the Secretary of Treasury here in the United States a particularly demanding job, but Era may want to comment on that.

    When it comes to the United States, the United States is one of the largest economies where it is a fact that debt is considerably above what it was pre‑pandemic. It is growing at about 2 percentage points of GDP every year. And so from that viewpoint, this path of debt cannot continue forever. We do believe that the situation in the United States is sustainable because the policymakers in the United States have access to many combinations of policy instruments that enable them to put the path of public debt under control. And they will do that at a time and with the composition of their choosing. The decision lies with the U.S. political system.

    Now, it is very important to understand that the United States is now in a very favorable economic and financial situation. Financing conditions are easing in the United States. The Fed has already started its policy pivot. The growth in the United States has been outperforming that of other advanced economies. The labor market in the United States shows indicators that are the envy of many other countries. And so the prescription that the time to adjust is now applies to the United States. It turns out that the Fiscal Monitor also documents that the United States is very important for the determination of global financial conditions and, therefore, adjustment in the United States is not only good for the United States, it is good also for the rest of the world.

    Ms. Mossot: Back to the center of the room. The lady with the red shirt, please.

    Question: My question is, whether you can comment on China’s recent stimulus package and as you mentioned in the opening, it seems that the largest economies, including China and the United States, is projected to keep raising its public debt, so I wonder how you are going to comment on the fiscal implication of the stimulus package, and do you have any other specific fiscal policy for China? Thank you.

    Mr. Gaspar: Thank you for your question. China is very important. China is one of the largest economies that I listed. The other is the United States. For China and for the United States, we say the same. Debt is growing. Debt is growing rapidly. That process cannot continue forever, but China, as the United States, has ample policy space. And so it has the means to put public debt in China under control with the policy composition and the timing that will be the choice of the Chinese political system.

    If I were to say what is most important for me for China, I would say four things. The first one is that fiscal policy, as structural policy, should contribute to the rebalancing of the Chinese economy in the sense of changing the composition of demand from exports to domestic demand. It is very important that the very high savings ratio in China diminishes so that Chinese households will be able to consume more and feel safe doing that. Making the social safety net in China wider would be a structural way of doing exactly that.

    The second aspect is to act decisively to end financial misallocations associated with the property sector crisis, the real estate crisis. That is very important to stabilize the situation in China but also to build confidence, which would help with the first dimension that I pointed out as well.

    Now, third, very much in the province of public finances, this is very important to address public finance imbalances and vulnerabilities at the sub‑national level. And now, there are sub‑national governments in China that are struggling with financial conditions—financial constraints, and it is very important to remove those constraints, and, again, is linked to my second point.

    Fourth and last, it is very important that fiscal policy, as structural policy, promotes the transition to a new growth model in China, a model based on technological innovation, a model that supports the structural transformation towards a green economy. And my understanding is that this fourth element has been emphasized by the political authorities in China at the highest level.

    Ms. Mossot: Thank you. Back to this side of the room.

    Question: As already mentioned, a novel assessment framework debt that is at risk varies from country to country. Please, could you provide me details, which risks are more important and more dangerous for Ukrainian debt? And one more related question. It is that you give advice for emerging markets to increase indirect taxes for revenue mobilization. And in the case of Ukraine, when we recently already increased our taxes, for example, war tax and tax for banks’ profits, which recommendations you can give us in our situation and the worse circumstances, and maybe there are other instruments despite tax increasing.

    Ms. Dabla‑Norris: Thank you. The debt‑at‑risk framework that has been presented in the Fiscal Monitor includes 70 countries, but we do not identify or quantify the debt at risk for all individual countries. Now, that said, the framework, as Davide mentions, shows that factors such as weak growth, tighter financial conditions, geopolitical uncertainty, or policy uncertainty can all add to future debt risks. This applies to Ukraine as it does to many other countries. And in the case of Ukraine particularly, the outlook, as you know, remains exceptionally uncertain.

    So, in terms of priorities, we believe that the authorities need to continue to restore debt sustainability. And in this regard, there is two important aspects. The first is to complete the restructuring of external commercial debt in line with program commitments. And the second is to really redouble efforts on domestic revenue mobilization and to accelerate the implementation of their national revenue strategy. Now, what is important here is the strategy is not only about aiming to raise revenues, mobilize revenues, but to fundamentally change the tax system. The strategy aims to reduce tax evasion, tax avoidance, to improve tax compliance, and more broadly enhance the fairness and equity of the tax system. And the IMF has long advocated for countries that it is not about raising rates. It is about broadening the base and making tax systems as fair and equitable as possible.

    Ms. Mossot: Back to this side. The gentleman on the second row.

    Question: I just want to ask a couple of questions, blended into one. In July, the IMF released calculations showing that the U.K. budget balance, excluding interest payments, would need to improve by between .8 and 1.4 percentage points of GDP per year to get debt under control, an adjustment of 22 to 39 billion pounds. Since then, we know that the Treasury has carried out an audit and discovered over‑spends it was not aware of, and the government has made decisions on things like public sector pay. So my question to you is, how has that changed the calculations you made in July? You talked about the importance of people‑focused adjustments. Would an increase in employer national insurance contributions be people‑friendly and growth‑friendly in your view?

    Mr. Gaspar: Thank you so much. So, your questions are very detailed and very specific, and so I am not in a position to comment on them at this point in time. Concerning the U.K., we believe it is very important to bring public debt under control. It is very important to control for public debt risks. In the Fiscal Monitor, we actually make the point that the risks that one should take into account when conducting a prudent fiscal policy go beyond the reference to the baseline that you made. So we believe that it is possible to make a stronger case for fiscal prudence than what was implicit in your question.

    Still, it is important how the adjustment is made, and Era has emphasized very much the importance of being people‑friendly. And we, all of us, have emphasized the important contribution of public investment. And there you do have specific estimates for the U.K., impacts of public investment on economic activity and growth from the Office of Budget’s responsibility. I do not know if you want to add something.

    Ms. Dabla‑Norris: No. Just to say that there are important tradeoffs, not just for the U.K., but for many countries, and there may be certain short‑term measures that see or appear to be less people‑friendly but that they improve the sustainability of the system for future generations. So there is an intertemporal aspect of this, referring to fiscal policy, that we often forget. So, pension systems, health systems, the sustainability, the fiscal sustainability of the system also matters for people because it is going to impact different generations in a different way.

    Ms. Mossot: The very last question.

    Question: Thank you. I would like to ask, what are the prescriptions on how developing countries can put their public debt in order, especially sub‑Saharan Africa? And, for example, Nigeria now and many other countries in Africa, their public debt has ballooned because of exchange rates devaluation. So what are your prescriptions? You also mentioned the tax systems should be friendly. In Africa, we are not seeing tax systems as being friendly now because a lot of people, they say, okay, why did not the tax base broaden? How much can you broaden since you have a lot of poor people? So, what kinds of tradeoffs do you do when incomes and people are also squeezed?

    The last one is from the report. $100 trillion of global debt. How much of that is from developing economies? Thank you.

    Mr. Furceri: Thank you very much. The challenges that Nigeria faces, as well as many other countries in the region, there are two. One is very low revenue‑to‑GDP ratio. For example, I believe that in the case of Nigeria it is about 10 percentage points. The second, one trend that we have seen, that we are a bit concerned, is that the ratio—the debt service obligation to revenue has been increasing. So for the average low‑income country, it is about 15 percent. What does it mean? It means that basically a large part of revenue in these countries goes to just finance the debt. And this is something that we would recommend to improve, or we can improve as we mentioned revenue mobilization. We think that it is important. It is important to broaden the tax base. But at the same time, and especially in countries like Nigeria that have been severely affected by the drought, we have seen also higher food price, it is important to put in place ex ante system and mechanisms that are transfer resources from the government to those that are most affected and those that are poor.

    Ms. Mossot: Thank you very much. We have to close this session. Thank you again Era, Davide, and Vitor. You can find the full report of the Fiscal Monitor on the IMF website and also a reminder that there is tomorrow at 8:00 a.m. the Managing Director’s press conference. Thank you, all.

    IMF Communications Department
    MEDIA RELATIONS

    PRESS OFFICER:

    Phone: +1 202 623-7100Email: MEDIA@IMF.org

    @IMFSpokesperson

    MIL OSI Economics –

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Sequel to Sweet Country, among 19 projects supported by Screen Australia’s First Nations Department

    Source: Australia Government Statements 4

    24 10 2024 – Media release

    Warwick Thornton, director of Wolfram: A sequel to Sweet Country
    Screen Australia’s First Nations Department is thrilled to announce its latest funding slate, including Warwick Thornton’s sequel to Sweet Country titled Wolfram, alongside two powerful documentaries for NITV spanning sport and politics.
    In total, 19 new projects, including 16 funded for development, will receive over $3 million in funding. This investment reflects the agency’s ongoing commitment to amplify First Nations voices and stories, aligned with the Federal Government’s National Cultural Policy Revive and its First Nations First pillar – recognising and respecting the crucial place of First Nations stories at the centre of Australia’s arts and culture.
    Screen Australia’s Head of First Nations Angela Bates said, “Our First Nations creatives are at the forefront of Australian storytelling, with many incredible projects being celebrated on the world stage and even more in development. The demand for our funding has never been higher, which is a positive sign for the industry. Across the 23/24FY, our Department invested over $7.1 million of funding including 105 opportunities across development, production, initiatives, attachments and market support – highlighting the incredible talent and rich narratives within Indigenous communities. With films like Wolfram and documentaries Dreaming Big and One Mind, One Heart, I’m inspired by the depth of powerful screen stories authored by First Nations Australians.”
    “It’s an exciting time for First Nations content creators, and we’re witnessing a new wave of talent. Looking ahead, we will continue to create pathways for these storytellers to thrive and expand their careers in the competitive global marketplace, collaborating with industry to enhance project visibility and impact,” said Bates. 
    This funding announcement follows a year of significant achievements for First Nations stories and creatives. Feature films The New Boy and The Moogai have garnered international acclaim. The third series of the landmark drama Total Control captivated local audiences with it being the most watched First Nations series in 23/24. Additionally, the ground-breaking children’s show Little J & Big Cuz returned for its fourth series on NITV and ABC, featuring 17 language groups and providing a powerful voice for children across Australia. The feature length documentary Kindred premiered on NITV in June, further highlighting the power of cultural connection.
    In the past year, the Department has also invested $1 million into the Enterprise program, supporting four First Nations businesses and three practitioners. Collaborating with Instagram Australia, it launched the fourth iteration of the First Nations Creators Program, supporting emerging talent in the content creator economy to build their skills in the digital space. The Department also supported six projects for production through the First Facts: First Nations Factual Showcase initiative, providing emerging and mid-career Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander filmmakers with opportunities to create 10-minute documentaries for Network 10.
    Warwick Thornton, director of Wolfram: A sequel to Sweet Country said, “This is my family’s story. My great grandmother and her daughters worked the Hatches Creek mines for whitefellas. Now a truth will come out and it’s called Wolfram.”
    The projects funded for production are:

    Wolfram: A sequel to Sweet Country: Set three years after Sweet Country, Wolfram continues the story of Philomac, now 17 and still living under the watchful eye of his ill-tempered master Mick Kennedy. After meeting Max and Kid, Philomac decides to free himself and the siblings from the white men’s brutality by running away into desert country. Along the way they are assisted by a pioneering family of Chinese Australian miners Jimmi and Wang Wei, who help reunite the children with their estranged mother Pansy. Wolfram is directed by Warwick Thornton and written by Steven McGregor and David Tranter, whose credits include Sweet Country. Also producing alongside Tranter is David Jowsey and Greer Simpkin of Sweet Country and Cecilia Ritchie (Limbo). It is financed with support from Screen NSW and the Adelaide Film Festival Investment Fund. Distributing is Dark Matter Distribution, with international sales managed by Memento.
    Dreaming Big: This six-part series for NITV takes an intimate look into the lives of gifted Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australian youths on the cusp of becoming the nation’s next generation of sports stars. Each episode highlights two young elite athletes, showcasing their relentless pursuit to reach the pinnacle of their chosen field as they navigate family and cultural obligations while remaining focused on their goals. The series will be directed by Andrew Dillon (Le Champion) and Abraham Byrne Jameson (One by One), with writer/producer Richard Jameson (Strait to the Plate season 2) and producer Veronica Fury (And We Danced) also attached. It is financed in association with Screen Queensland.
    One Mind, One Heart: In this feature-length documentary for NITV, a historic political Yirrkala bark petition is discovered and makes its way home to Yolgnu country, evoking the spirit of decades of activism for change. The repatriation provides the opportunity to track the long political campaign – through petition, song, dance, campaigning – to keep culture strong and to have a voice for country. One Mind, One Heart is from writer/director Larissa Behrendt (The First Inventors) and producer Michaela Perske (Larapinta). It is financed in association with Screen NSW, with support from the Adelaide Film Festival Investment Fund, Spectrum Entertainment, Documentary Australia and Philanthropy via the Shark Island Institute.

    Also announced today are three television dramas, 11 feature films and two documentaries that will share in over $540,000 of development funding. The projects include feature film Native Gods from 2024 Enterprise Business recipient Djali House; comedy series Long Story Short from writer/director Tanith Glynn-Maloney (Windcatcher); documentary Fire Country, a transformative exploration of Indigenous fire knowledge and wisdom; and feature film RED, about eight Western Australian First Nations women who share the ugly secret of being surrounded by the missing.
    Click here for the full list of projects funded for Production and Development by the First Nations Department throughout the 2023/24 financial year.
    ABOUT SCREEN AUSTRALIA’S FIRST NATIONS DEPARTMENT
    Entirely led and staffed by First Nations Australians, the Department funds drama, documentary and children’s content across all platforms. The Department also identifies emerging First Nations talent, advocates for representation and funds skills development and career escalation opportunities. For more information on the First Nations Department and funding available, click here.
    Screen Australia is expanding the First Nations Department and is recruiting for the new position of Director of First Nations. This is to align with the Agency’s commitment to supporting authentic First Nations screen stories, to further champion industry practitioners and build opportunities for growth and visibility. For more information about the role, click here.
    Download PDF
    Media enquiries
    Maddie Walsh | Publicist
    + 61 2 8113 5915  | [email protected]
    Jessica Parry | Senior Publicist (Mon, Tue, Thu)
    + 61 428 767 836  | [email protected]
    All other general/non-media enquiries
    Sydney + 61 2 8113 5800  |  Melbourne + 61 3 8682 1900 | [email protected]

    MIL OSI News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Casey, Boyle Deliver Funding to Modernize Pipeline in Philadelphia, Save Families $250 on Energy Costs

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Pennsylvania Bob Casey
    More than 66 miles of cast iron pipeline will be replaced over five years to reduce methane leaks
    Funding made possible by Casey and Boyle-backed infrastructure law
    Washington, D.C. – U.S. Senator Bob Casey (D-PA) and U.S. Representative Brendan Boyle (D-PA-2) announced that Philadelphia Gas Works (PGW) will receive federal funding to help replace more than 66 miles of old cast iron natural gas pipes with modern materials to reduce gas leaks. The project builds on recent funding awards for additional pipeline replacement and will, taken together with those recent awards, create 120 jobs and save families an average of $250 per household on energy costs. This funding comes from the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) and was made possible by the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA). 
    “Thanks to the infrastructure law, we are making game-changing investments to make our communities safer. This funding will replace and modernize miles of natural gas pipeline to lower energy costs and protect Philadelphia neighborhoods from dangerous methane leaks,” said Senator Casey. “This project is another key example of how modernizing our Commonwealth’s infrastructure creates jobs, brings costs down for families, and keeps Pennsylvanians safe.”
    “I am proud to help deliver this funding for my district. Working with Sen Casey and others, we were able to pass the historic Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act. Now, funding from this law is making a significant improvement to the aging infrastructure of Philadelphia and the region beyond. The replacement of these gas pipes will ensure a more secure transportation of hazardous materials that are essential to our daily lives. In addition to creating hundreds of jobs, this project will be the first of many in the future to bring Philadelphia’s aging infrastructure into the 21st century,” said Representative Boyle.
    The PHMSA Natural Gas Distribution and Infrastructure Safety and Modernization (NGDISM) program is a first-of-its kind grant program to help improve public safety, protect public health, and reduce methane emissions from natural gas distribution pipes in historically disadvantaged communities. Leaky natural gas pipes increase energy costs and cause extraneous methane emissions that are dangerous to communities and the environment. This funding will help Philadelphia Gas Works (PGW) complete an effort to replace more than 66 miles of publicly owned cast-iron natural gas pipe with new, polyethylene materials. The project will create 120 jobs in Philadelphia, save families an average of $250 per household on energy costs, and reduce methane emissions by more than 300 metric tons annually.
    PGW has received a total of  $125,000,000 to replace over 66 miles of cast-iron pipeline across Philadelphia.

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI: Faircourt Asset Management Inc. Announces October Distribution

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Toronto, ON, Oct. 23, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Faircourt Asset Management Inc., as Manager of the Faircourt Fund (NEO:FGX), is pleased to announce the monthly distribution payable on the Shares of the below listed Fund.

    Faircourt Funds Trading Symbol Distribution Amount (per share/unit) Ex-Dividend Date Record Date Payable Date
    Faircourt Gold Income Corp. FGX $0.024 October 31, 2024 October 31, 2024 November 14, 2024

    Faircourt Asset Management Inc. is the Investment Advisor for Faircourt Gold Income Corp.

    This press release is not for distribution in the United States or over United States wire services.

    For further information on the Faircourt Funds, please visit www.faircourtassetmgt.com or
    please contact 1-800-831-0304.

    You will usually pay brokerage fees to your dealer if you purchase or sell Shares of the Fund on the NEO Exchange or other alternative Canadian trading system (an “exchange”). If the Shares are purchased or sold on an exchange, investors may pay more than the current net asset value when buying Shares of the Fund and may receive less than the current net asset value when selling them.

    There are ongoing fees and expenses associated with owning units of an investment fund. An investment fund must prepare disclosure documents that contain key information about the fund. You can find more detailed information about the fund in the public filings available at www.sedar.com. Investment funds are not guaranteed, their values change frequently and past performance may not be repeated.

    The MIL Network –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Amata Hails $24.4 Million in 2025 EPA Investment from Bipartisan Infrastructure Law

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Representative for Western Samoa Congresswoman Aumua Amata

    Headline: Amata Hails $24.4 Million in 2025 EPA Investment from Bipartisan Infrastructure Law

    Washington, D.C. – Congresswoman Uifa’atali Amata is hailing Wednesday’s announcement by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for a total of $24.4 million in fiscal year 2025 investment in American Samoa from the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law(BIL), which Amata backed publicly throughout the bill’s debate and passage in 2021. The official name of the BIL is the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA).

    Congresswoman Amata with our Veterans in Honolulu

    “I supported the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law in 2021, and since then I’ve been repeatedly pleased to see it result directly in numerous funding projects for American Samoa over these several years,” said Congresswoman Aumua Amata. “These funds, already appropriated to EPA by Congress, make lasting improvements for our safe and healthy drinking water for years to come.”

    “Thank you to EPA Administrator Regan for the attention to American Samoa’s appropriate share in these funds from the Bipartisan Infrastructure Act,” continued Congresswoman Amata. “Thank you to the EPA Pacific Southwest Region (Region 9) in working with American Samoa Government and our American Samoa EPA on planning for much-needed water projects. Congratulations to ASEPA Director Fa’amao Asalele, and special appreciation to all who work on these efforts.”

    The $24.4 million includes $17,219,000, announced Wednesday, and $7,181,000 notified recently on October 8, both from the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law. American Samoa’s total under the two notifications is the most of any of the four insular areas, totaling slightly more than Guam and several million more than CNMI and USVI.

    Wednesday’s notification of over $17.2 million includes two areas of funding: Drinking Water State Revolving Funds (DWSRF) of $2,204,000, which emphasizes lead removal, andClean Water State Revolving Funds (CWSRF) of $15,015,000. Within that $15 million from CWSRF, the further breakdown is $13,820,000 in general allotment, and $1,195,000 in emerging contaminants program.

    These 2025 EPA funds are part of a five-year planned investment in water infrastructure upgrades, and the nationwide total of these two October notices is $6.2 billion in BIL water quality and safety projects.

    In EPA announcements following passage of the BIL, the EPA hailed the congressional investment as a historic impact in the nation’s healthy water supply and water infrastructure, and Administrator Regan noted the funds support job creation, construction, and emphasized projects for underserved communities. The SRF programs are designed to generate significant and sustainable water quality and public health benefits across the country.

    EPA Administrator Michael S. Regan said, “Water keeps us healthy, sustains vibrant communities and dynamic ecosystems, and supports economic opportunity. When our water infrastructure fails, it threatens people’s health, peace of mind, and the environment. With the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law’s historic investment in water, EPA is working with states and local partners to upgrade infrastructure and address local challenges—from lead in drinking water, to PFAS, to water main breaks, to sewer overflows and climate resilience. Together, we are creating good-paying jobs while ensuring that all people can rely on clean and safe water.”

    ###

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: FOLLOWING THEIR CALL FOR ACCOUNTABILITY FOR FAILURES AT BUFFALO VA, SCHUMER, GILLIBRAND, KENNEDY, LANGWORTHY ANNOUNCE NATIONWIDE REVIEW TO IDENTIFY & INVESTIGATE SYSTEMIC ISSUES WITHIN THE VA’S…

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for New York Charles E Schumer
    Investigation Will Help Ensure That No Veteran – In Buffalo Or Anywhere Else In The Country – Fails To Receive Desperately Needed Treatment Again 
    Following their call for accountability after egregious failures at the Buffalo VA left veterans waiting weeks or months to receive care, U.S. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, Representative Tim Kennedy, and Representative Nick Langworthy today announced a nationwide evaluation of the VA’s community care consult practices to root out systemic issues within the VA’s health care network.
    At Schumer, Gillibrand, Kennedy, and Langworthy’s request, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) will be conducting a comprehensive review of the VA’s community care consult practices. The investigation will include a review of the VA’s practices around scheduling patient treatment, particularly for high-risk and complex conditions. It will also review practices around handling concerns raised by patients and health care providers in the case of delayed treatment. 
    “No veteran, in Western NY or anywhere in America, should experience failures like those that occurred at the Buffalo VA. We must make sure this unacceptable failure to provide the care our veterans need never happens again. This new independent investigation by the Government Accountability Office will conduct a top-to-bottom review of the VA’s nationwide practices,” said Senator Schumer. “We must put better infrastructure and oversight practices in place to protect veterans in Western NY and across the country. We will be watching the VA like a hawk to ensure changes are made and VA centers across the country deliver on their promise to our vets to provide them the top-notch care they have earned and deserve.”
    “What happened at the Buffalo VA was unacceptable. Nothing should ever get in the way of veterans receiving desperately needed care,” said Senator Gillibrand. “I am glad that the Government Accountability Office is investigating the VA at my urging and I look forward to seeing the results of their investigation. I will continue to monitor this situation closely and fight to ensure that no veteran slips through the cracks.”
    “I am pleased that the Government Accountability Office is moving forward with reviewing VA community care practices to ensure our heroes receive the quality and timely medical services they deserve,” said Congressman Kennedy. “I will continue to do everything in my power to uphold our duty of care and get the Buffalo VA back on track.” 
    “We must keep our nation’s promise to our veterans that when they get home, they get the care they earned and deserve — the failures that caused critical delays in care at the Buffalo VA are absolutely unacceptable,” said Congressman Langworthy. “This new investigation led by the Government Accountability Office will help us identify the problems that allowed this to happen and ensure it never happens again. I’ll be actively involved to make sure we hold the VA accountable and deliver real results for our veterans.”
    According to a report from the Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Inspector General, critically ill patients at the Buffalo VA had their treatments postponed for months or even canceled entirely, despite concerns raised by patients and health care providers. In one case, a patient waited nine weeks for radiation therapy for a new cancer malignancy, despite efforts by the chief of oncology to get the community care team to schedule treatment. In another, a veteran died waiting for palliative radiation therapy that would have eased severe pain from stage 4 cancer. Following the shocking revelations of the report the lawmakers requested an independent investigation by the GAO into the VA community care practices that led to these failures to ensure better care for veterans both in Western NY and across the country.
    Specifically, the GAO review will include: 
    Oversight of medical centers’ adherence to Veterans Health Administration (VHA) requirements for processing consults for conditions considered high-risk or complex; 
    Whether consults are appropriately prioritized and consistently processed within VHA’s timeliness requirements;
    Reviewing how medical facilities, VISN leaders, and the VHA Office of Integrated Veteran Care respond to concerns regarding delays in consult scheduling from providers, staff, patients, and their families and how this is built into VHA’s quality and risk management programs;
    Best practices to prevent and address leadership deficiencies within the community care scheduling process, including the prioritization of patient safety.
    The full text of Senator Schumer, Gillibrand, Kennedy, and Langworthy’s original letter requesting this investigation by the Government Accountability Office is available below:
    Dear Mr. Dodaro:
                On Friday, September 27th, the Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Inspector General (“OIG”) released its findings following its inspection of the VA Western New York Health System in Buffalo, New York. The report – Leaders Failed to Address Community Care Consult Delays Despite Staff’s Advocacy Efforts at VA Western New York Healthcare System in Buffalo – found a shocking pattern of apathy and incompetence on the part of Department facility and community care leaders in addressing the needs of patients with complex and high-risk conditions.
                As the report indicates, these delays caused or led to an increased risk of harm to the patients. One veteran passed away while waiting months to receive palliative care that would have helped manage cancer pain in their final months. Another patient waited nine weeks to schedule radiation therapy for a new cancer malignancy, despite efforts by the chief of oncology to get the community care team to schedule treatment. Another veteran in their twenties continued to suffer from seizures for another 10 months as they waited for a consult to be scheduled, the delay partially caused by a referral being canceled by the community care medical director. These are only some of the cases highlighted by an OIG report that identified incompetence and bureaucratic red tape that failed the veterans in Buffalo again and again.
                The failure by the leadership at the Buffalo VA Medical Center must never occur again, and veterans across the United States must be reassured that they can receive timely and high-quality health care across the VA health care system.  Therefore, I request that the Government Accountability Office (GAO) conduct a review of Veterans Integrated Services Networks’ (VISN) community care consult practices. The review should include, but not be limited to: 
    Oversight of medical centers’ adherence to Veterans Health Administration (VHA) requirements for processing consults for conditions considered high-risk or complex; 
    Whether consults are appropriately prioritized and consistently processed within VHA’s timeliness requirements;
    Reviewing how medical facility, VISN leaders, and the VHA Office of Integrated Veteran Care respond to concerns regarding delays in consult scheduling from providers, staff, patients, and their families and how this is built into VHA’s quality and risk management programs;
    Best practices to prevent and address leadership deficiencies within the community care scheduling process, including the prioritization of patient safety;
    I request a briefing on the preliminary findings with final results to be submitted on a date and in form mutually agreed upon. Please include recommendations, as appropriate, for agency or congressional action in your evaluation.

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI Security: Wilsonville Woman Sentenced to Federal Prison for Laundering More than $4.6 Million in Drug Proceeds

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    PORTLAND, Ore.—A Wilsonville, Oregon woman was sentenced to federal prison today for laundering millions of dollars in drug proceeds as the chief money launderer for a drug trafficking organization operating in the Pacific Northwest and California.

    Jacqueline Paola Rodriguez Barrientos, 44, was sentenced to 57 months in federal prison and three years’ supervised release.

    “We thank the coordinated efforts of our federal, state, and local law enforcement partners actively combatting these drug trafficking organizations and the damage they inflict on our communities,” said Natalie Wight, U.S. Attorney for the District of Oregon.

    “While people like Ms. Rodriguez Barrientos conceal the profits of drug enterprises, the losses fall on far too many Americans and their families,” said Adam Jobes, Special Agent in Charge of IRS Criminal Investigation’s Seattle Field Office. “We will continue doing our part to expose the finances of criminal organizations.”

    According to court documents, beginning in fall 2021, special agents from the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) in Portland began investigating a drug trafficking organization suspected of transporting counterfeit oxycodone pills containing fentanyl and heroin from California into Oregon and Washington State for distribution.

    A parallel financial investigation led by IRS Criminal Investigation (IRS:CI) revealed that Barrientos laundered money generated by the drug trafficking organization through the Mazatlán Beauty Salon in Tualatin, Oregon and by buying real estate that she converted into income-generating rentals. The real estate purchases were made with cashier’s checks funded by large cash deposits. Currency Transaction Reports generated by several banks showed that Barrientos made frequent cash deposits ranging from $10,000 to more than $373,000 into accounts held in her name or the name of her salon. These deposits totaled more than $3.5 million during a 9-month period in 2021.

    Since February 2021, members of the drug trafficking organization also purchased a total of nine residential properties in Oregon, Washington and Nevada with an estimated total value of more than $4.6 million. All nine properties were purchased outright with no mortgages. Barrientos used laundered funds to purchase eight of these properties. She then used third-party property management companies to rent these properties and received approximately $10,000 per month in rental income.

    On February 17, 2022, DEA agents arrested Barrientos and an associate at their Las Vegas residence. Agents found and seized two luxury vehicles, several loose receipts documenting high-end retail purchases, credit card statements documenting more than $16,000 spent on tickets to attend a professional boxing match, and other evidence memorializing the couple’s high-end lifestyle.

    On February 9, 2022, a federal grand jury in Portland returned an indictment charging Barrientos with conspiracy to launder drug proceeds. She pleaded guilty on July 31, 2024.

    Barrientos has agreed to forfeiture of the properties purchased with criminal proceeds as part of the resolution of her case. Some of the properties have been sold by the government; others are pending forfeiture and sale. The proceeds of forfeited assets are deposited in the Justice Department’s Assets Forfeiture Fund (AFF) and used to restore funds to crime victims and for a variety of other law enforcement purposes. To learn more about the AFF, please visit: https://www.justice.gov/afp/assets-forfeiture-fund-aff.

    This case was investigated by DEA with assistance from the FBI, Homeland Security Investigations (HSI), IRS:CI, Tigard Police Department, and Oregon State Police. It is being prosecuted by Peter D. Sax, Assistant U.S. Attorney for the District of Oregon. Forfeiture proceedings are being handled by AUSA Katie De Villiers, also of the District of Oregon.

    This case is part of an Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Forces (OCDETF) investigation. OCDETF identifies, disrupts, and dismantles the highest-level drug traffickers, money launderers, gangs, and transnational criminal organizations that threaten the United States by using a prosecutor-led, intelligence-driven, multi-agency approach that leverages the strengths of federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies against criminal networks.

    MIL Security OSI –

  • MIL-OSI Economics: My Vision for ADB: Strive Together to Attain Sustainable and Inclusive Growth in the Region with Innovative and Tailored Solutions – Masato Kanda

    Source: Asia Development Bank

    ADB has played a vital role in the development of the Asia and Pacific region not only helping it become the engine room of global growth today but ensuring the region is resilient and inclusive. The many crises and challenges currently confronting us, from climate change to digitalization and gender equality, require continually striving for ADB to remain the most trusted partner for all members. Throughout my nearly four decades as a government official, I have had the tremendous opportunity to work with many dedicated professionals in the region committed to a shared vision of economic stability and prosperity, and poverty eradication.

    If I am afforded the immense privilege of being the next President of ADB, I will steadfastly commit to ensuring ADB can achieve its vision of delivering sustainable and inclusive growth to the region with innovative and tailored solutions, in alignment with the updated Strategy 2030. I can only do this by working with each and every member and delivering the New Operating Model so the ADB remains a client-first bank that maximizes its development impact, underpinned by talented and diverse staff.

    1. Background

    Since its inception in 1966, ADB has played a vital role in supporting developing member countries (DMCs) in Asia and the Pacific. Throughout its history, it has worked unflinchingly on the arduous tasks, including, most notably, facilitation of the recovery after the 1997 Asian financial crisis. Each time it faces a crisis, ADB has provided innovative solutions. The launch of the ADF (Asian Development Fund) and the bond issuance to enhance its support to DMCs after the oil shock in 1970s is a case in point. ADB also helped DMCs achieve a solid track record of growth through its financial and non-financial instruments. The real growth rate of Emerging and Developing Asia over the past 10 years was 5.6 percent, 2.5 percentage points higher than global growth.

    However, despite the clear progress toward sustainable and inclusive growth, significant challenges remain. The ongoing climate crisis and the risk of another pandemic as serious as COVID 19, indicate that ADB should be even bolder to address global public goods (GPGs) and regional public goods (RPGs). Moreover, while ADB needs to tackle these emerging tasks at a regional and global scale, it remains responsible for supporting DMCs address country-specific challenges, including not least poverty reduction. It is paramount that ADB remains the most trusted partner in the region.

    Over more than 60 years, Japan has been working with all member countries. As a former official at the Japanese Ministry of Finance, in particular during my time as Vice-Minister of Finance for International Affairs, I have had the privilege to work with inspiring leaders, dedicated professionals, and wonderful friends across Asia and the Pacific. Nothing could make me happier than the opportunity to continue to work with all of them to establish a clear pathway toward the ADB’s vision: to achieve a prosperous, inclusive, resilient, and sustainable Asia and the Pacific, while sustaining its efforts to eradicate extreme poverty.

    The rest of this Vision Statement is organized as follows. In the next section, I describe the challenges and unique opportunities for the region. In section 3, I elaborate on my suggested direction that ADB should head toward. Section 4 concludes with my unwavering commitment to help champion sustainable growth in the region.

    2. Challenges and opportunities

    Climate change. The DMCs, in particular Small Island Developing States (SIDS) in the Pacific, are prone to natural disasters stemming from climate change, such as typhoons, cyclones, and rising sea levels. Moreover, Asia and the Pacific emits almost half of the world’s greenhouse gases, partly reflecting its high energy demand. However, its coal plants are relatively young, and its grid coverage is limited, complicating the transition to net-zero. Against this backdrop, ADB has spearheaded innovative climate change initiatives as the region’s climate bank. Nevertheless, bolder actions are still warranted, both on the mitigation and adaptation fronts.

    Infrastructure gap. Infrastructure lays a fundamental basis to eradicate poverty, boost potential growth and enhance regional connectivity. The region still faces a glaring gap in infrastructure. ADB has estimated that developing Asia will need $1.7 trillion annually to close the gap in infrastructure, and this figure could be larger given the modest growth over the past several years. At the same time, more actions are needed for boosting the quality of infrastructure investment, strengthening climate resilience, achieving high environmental and social standards, preserving biodiversity, and creating jobs. 

    Poverty. The number of people who are below the poverty line rose significantly after the COVID-19 crisis, setting back the fight against poverty in Asia and the Pacific by at least two years. Income poverty is often associated with poor health and lack of education, hampering human capital development and restraining growth. Rapid economic growth and a stable macroeconomic environment in the region would help address poverty across the region but this can only be achieved with certain policy actions such as those outlined below.

    Inequality. Economic growth in the region has come with widening inequality, in particular after the COVID-19 crisis. Inequality could damage social stability and cohesion and undermine economic dynamism. Also, while rapid urbanization has provided an increasing number of citizens with access to better public services (education, water and sanitary services, transportation), it can widen the gap with vulnerable people that do not have access to such basic services and the social safety net.

    Diversity. Asia and the Pacific boasts a wide variety of cultures and ethnicities. This has required, and will continue to require, ADB to tailor its supporting tools to country-specific circumstances, with due regard to size, income distribution, population dynamics, and social norms of each DMC. On procurement, while ADB remains committed to maintaining high environmental and social standards, it also needs to take country systems into account.

    Gender. ADB needs to further pursue gender equality in line with its vision. Our journey is yet to be completed: according to the United Nations, the participation of women in the labor force in Asia and the Pacific is below the global average, as is the promotion of women in leadership positions. ADB should continue to be the thought leader to transform the lives of women, by helping DMCs take decisive steps toward gender equality, while recognizing country-specific cultural and social circumstances.

    Private capital mobilization. One of the ADB’s New Operating Model (NOM)’s priorities is a shift toward the private sector. Yet, the amount of private capital mobilization has been significantly below the aspiration of various development agendas, including the Paris Agreement. Mobilizing private capital is easier said than done. The upcoming discussion on the ADB’s Private Sector Development Action Plan will lay a foundation for the ADB’s medium-term efforts to boost private capital mobilization and enable a stronger private sector in line with the ADB’s vision.

    Domestic resource mobilization. In many DMCs, tax revenues are still short of supporting their own sustainable development. The Asia Pacific Tax Hub, established in May 2021 under President Asakawa’s leadership, has helped DMCs modernize their tax systems through strategic policy dialogues, institutional capacity building, knowledge sharing, and collaboration with development partners. The potential benefits of domestic resource mobilization include more private capital mobilization through blended finance.

    Digitalization. Digital technologies can be an enabler that brings transformational impacts, allowing DMCs to leapfrog the development process that advanced economies took much longer to go through. At the same time, rapid progress in digitalization comes with costs and risks, including a digital divide and cyber threats. With the approval of its Strategy 2030 Midterm Review, ADB is pursuing a more active role on digital transformation as one of the new strategic focus areas.

    3. Ways forward

    I will now elaborate how I would work toward achieving a prosperous, inclusive, resilient, and sustainable Asia and the Pacific if I were elected as President of ADB. I will maintain the “client-first” principle as the organization’s highest priority by tailoring the role of ADB to specific challenges faced by all DMCs. Moreover, ADB should fully utilize its well-established collaboration between the sovereign and non-sovereign sectors, which is one of the ADB’s great strengths. My vision below is also crafted with a clear purpose to augment the updated Strategy 2030 with the organizational vision statement and the new strategic focus areas (climate action; private sector development; regional cooperation and public goods; digital transformation; and resilience and empowerment). For this purpose, I would ensure that the Capital Utilization Plan will be ambitious and fully utilize different financial resources.

    Providing innovative financial climate solutions to DMCs. ADB has established its reputation as an innovator in climate and development finance, exemplified by IF-CAP (Innovative Finance Facility for Climate in Asia and the Pacific), which is expected to be officially launched soon. By focusing squarely on the development-climate nexus under the Climate Change Action Plan, ADB should continue to be the region’s climate bank, in line with climate as the first enhanced focus area. In the context of the ongoing MDB Evolution and the CAF (Capital Adequacy Framework) Review, ADB must be a role-model for other MDBs (Multilateral Development Banks) to foster climate mitigation and adaptation.

    Promoting private capital mobilization. With the new quantitative targets under Strategy 2030, ADB should pursue ambitious goals of mobilizing and enabling private capital, by taking concrete actions under the upcoming Private Sector Development Action Plan. Closer engagement with global and regional market participants and industry experts, as well as deepening of domestic capital markets, would help bring much needed private financial flows for sustainable growth.

    Supporting domestic resource mobilization. ADB should remain committed to helping DMCs strengthen their revenue base, paving the way for the achievement of self-sustained development over time. ADB should also make sure that this effort serves as a key ingredient for policy discussion in the context of policy-based loans (PBLs). The Asia Pacific Tax Hub should continue to play an instrumental role in this regard, by providing comprehensive diagnoses on and solutions to the underlying structural problems of revenue shortfalls.

    Fostering regional cooperation and integration. Trade and investment flows are increasingly interconnected within the region, and hence fostering regional cooperation will help garner needed development financial flows and create a favorable macroeconomic environment in the region. ADB should further promote cross-border connectivity, trade integration, and financial links, all of which are regional public goods. Regional procurement, which is being considered in line with the ADF14 agreement, is of particular importance.

    Striking the balance between GPG/RPG and country-specific demand. ADB must strategically calibrate its resource allocation so that it can help deliver GPGs/RPGs, such as air quality management, biodiversity, food and nutrition security, pandemic prevention, preparedness and response, and pollution prevention, while still paying due regard to country-specific circumstances. Enhanced policy dialogue with DMCs, along with in-house analyses on externalities in the region, should be made a priority. Staff incentive structures could be also fine-tuned in line with such an organization-wide ambition.

    Prioritizing digital transformation in a cross-cutting manner. ADB should be responsive to high client demand for digital solutions, including digital connectivity and digital literacy, among others. ADB should actively pursue policies to bring the maximum benefits from digitalization across all different sectors and pursue synergies with other development priorities, such as private capital mobilization, infrastructure development, and regional connectivity. Strengthening its support to social start-up companies with cutting-edge digital technologies could complement these efforts.

    Mainstreaming gender in overall ADB operations. A pathway to gender equality is not uniform, differing from one country to another. The new commitment following the Midterm Review of Strategy 2030 must be attained with all possible measures. ADB should continue to be a champion of gender equality in its operations to empower women in DMCs. To lead by example, ADB should also continue to promote gender equality across the organization.

    Maximizing development impact by tailoring ADB solutions to country-specific development and climate needs. The ADB’s clients widely differ in their size, level of development, development needs, and risks of vulnerabilities and fragility. ADB should fully employ its diagnosis provided by regional VPs/Departments, while ensuring that Country Partnership Strategies benefit from various analytical works by the Sector Group, Governance Thematic Group, Economic Research and Development Impact Department, and other departments. Also, outcome orientation remains a necessary condition to better achieve the organizational vision. The new window to address fragility under ADF14 could be a successful example to address immense challenges faced by fragile and conflict-affected situations (FCAS), as well as SIDS.

    Utilizing knowledge products for operations on the ground. As a regional knowledge bank, ADB has produced a wealth of analytical and knowledge products. While they are undoubtedly used by research institutes in the regions, ADB needs to be more aggressive in disseminating its analytical expertise to country and sector operations on the ground, including lending activities and policy dialogue.

    Fully operationalizing the NOM. Implementing the NOM requires continuous efforts on a multi-year basis. ADB needs to accelerate the transition to a more climate-focused and private sector-oriented business model, particularly to address global and regional challenges at scale. Staff incentive structures should be designed to establish a critical link with organization-wide priorities, such as GPGs/PRGs as well as decentralization. Also, diversity of the staff should remain one of the ADB’s core values.

    Enhancing partnerships with MDBs and DFIs. The development challenges in front of us cannot be solved by ADB alone. ADB should enhance its collaboration with other MDBs and venture into new types of cooperation, such as exposure exchange, beyond traditional co-financing and knowledge sharing. ADB could also strengthen ties with bilateral DFIs (Development Finance Institutions) in the region to create synergies and improve administrative efficiencies while maintaining high environmental and social standards.

    4. Closing remarks

    The socio-economic environment surrounding Asia and the Pacific has drastically changed since the ADB’s inception: now, the region is suffering from chronic natural disasters more often, with severer magnitude; inequality is widening despite increased national income per capita; and uncertainty is looming in the global economy and financial markets. Worse, all these complex problems are inter-connected. ADB is the only organization in the region that helps tackle these challenges, with its unparalleled financial firepower, highly motivated and dedicated staff, and regional convening power.

    More recently, ADB performed immensely in the context of the MDB Evolution over the past two years. The international community is striving hard to redefine the roles of MDBs and update their financial and operational models. Undoubtedly, ADB is, and will continue to be, a frontrunner in this global goal: it has created lending headroom of US$100 billion over the next ten years through its rigorous CAF review, launched innovative financial instruments, and aligned its tools and environmental and social standards with its peers. I am confident that the ADB’s support to DMCs in the region can be a role-model for other MDBs.

    I would also like to emphasize that throughout its history, ADB has built trust among all stakeholders inside and outside the region, including DMCs, donors, civil society, development partners, staff, and management. It is this trust that has enabled ADB to shine as a long-standing home doctor, provide the highest value-add to its clients, and connect leaders and professionals in the region.

    With these strengths, ADB has positioned itself as the most trusted and dedicated organization in Asia and the Pacific. I would like to devote all my expertise and knowledge to this great organization and work toward its vision, together with colleagues and friends from the region and beyond. I am more than ready to serve to all members.

    MIL OSI Economics –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Remarks by APNSA Jake Sullivan at the Brookings  Institution

    US Senate News:

    Source: The White House
    Brookings InstitutionWashington, D.C.
    Good morning, everyone.  And thank you so much, David, for that introduction and for having me here today.  It’s great to be back at Brookings.
    As many of you know, I was here last year to lay out President Biden’s vision for renewing American economic leadership, a vision that responded to several converging challenges our country faced: the return of intense geopolitical competition; a rise in inequality and a squeeze on the middle class; a less vibrant American industrial base; an accelerating climate crisis; vulnerable supply chains; and rapid technological change.
    For the preceding three decades, the U.S. economy had enjoyed stronger topline aggregate growth than other advanced democracies, and had generated genuine innovation and technological progress, but our economic policies had not been adapted to deal effectively with these challenges.  That’s why President Biden implemented a modern industrial strategy, one premised on investing at home in ourselves and our national strength, and on shifting the energies of U.S. foreign policy to help our partners around the world do the same.
    In practice, that’s meant mobilizing public investment to unlock private sector investment to deliver on big challenges like the clean energy transition and artificial intelligence, revitalizing our capacity to innovate and to build, creating diversified and resilient global supply chains, setting high standards for everything from labor to the environment to technology.  Because on that level playing field, our logic goes, America can compete and win.  Preserving open markets and also protecting our national security and doing all of these things together with allies and partners.
    Since I laid this vision out in my speech at Brookings last year, I’ve listened with great interest to many thoughtful responses, because these are early days.  Meaningful shifts in policy require constant iteration and reflection.  That’s what will make our policy stronger and more sustainable. 
    So, today, I’m glad to be back here at Brookings to reengage in this conversation, because I really believe that the ideas I’m here to discuss and the policies that flow from them are among the most consequential elements of the administration’s foreign as well as domestic policy, and I believe they will constitute an important legacy of Joe Biden’s presidency. 
    I want to start by reflecting on some of the questions I’ve heard and then propose a few ways to consolidate our progress.
    One overarching question is at the core of many others: Does our new approach mean that we’re walking away from a positive-sum view of the world, that America is just in it for itself at the expense of everyone else? 
    In a word, no, it doesn’t.  In fact, we’re returning to a tradition that made American international leadership such a durable force, what Alexis de Tocqueville called “interest rightly understood.”  The notion that it’s in our own self-interest to strengthen our partners and sustain a fair economic system that helps all of us prosper.
    After World War Two, we built an international economic order in the context of a divided world, an order that helped free nations recover and avoid a return to the protectionist and nationalist mistakes of the 1930s, an order that also advanced American economic and geopolitical power.
    In the 1990s, after the collapse of the Soviet Union, we took that order global, embracing the old Eastern bloc, China, India, and many developing countries.  Suddenly, the major powers were no longer adversaries or competitors.  Capital flowed freely across borders.  Global supply chains became “just in time,” without anyone contemplating potential strategic risk.
    Each of these approaches was positive-sum, and each reflected the world as it was.
    Now, the world of the 1990s is over, and it’s not coming back, and it’s not a coherent plan or critique just to wish it so.
    We’re seeing the return of great power competition.  But unlike the Cold War era, our economies are closely intertwined.  We’re on the verge of revolutionary technological change with AI, with economic and geopolitical implications.  The pandemic laid bare the fragilities in global supply chains that have been growing for decades.  The climate crisis grows more urgent with every hurricane and heat wave. 
    So we need to articulate, once again, de Tocqueville’s notion of interest rightly understood.  To us, that means pursuing a strategy that is fundamentally positive-sum, calibrated to the geopolitical realities of today and rooted in what is good for America — for American workers, American communities, American businesses, and American national security and economic strength.
    We continue to believe deeply in the mutual benefits of international trade and investment, enhanced and enabled by bold public investment in key sectors; bounded in rare but essential cases by principled controls on key national security technologies; protected against harmful non-market practices, labor and environment abuses, and economic coercion; and critically coordinated with a broad range of partners. 
    The challenges we face are not uniquely our own and nor can we solve them alone.  We want and need our partners to join us.  And given the demand signal we hear back from them, we think that in the next decade, American leadership will be measured by our ability to help our partners pull off similar approaches and build alignment and complementarity across our policies and our investments. 
    If we get that right, we can show that international economic integration is compatible with democracy and national sovereignty.  And that is how we get out of Dani Rodrik’s trilemma.
    Now, what does that mean in practice?  What does this kind of positive-sum approach mean for trade policy?  Are we walking away from trade as a core pillar of international economic policy? 
    U.S. exports and imports have recovered from their dip during the pandemic, with the real value of U.S. trade well above 2019 levels in each of the last two years.  We’re also the largest outbound source of FDI in the world. 
    So, we are not walking away from international trade and investment.  What we are doing is moving away from specific policies that, frankly, didn’t contemplate the urgent challenges we face: The climate crisis.  Vulnerable, concentrated, critical mineral and semiconductor supply chains.  Persistent attacks on workers’ rights.  And not just more global competition, but more competition with a country that uses pervasive non-market policies and practices to distort and dominate global markets. 
    Ignoring or downplaying these realities will not help us chart a viable path forward.  Our approach to trade responds to these challenges. 
    Climate is a good example.  American manufacturers are global leaders in clean steel production, yet they’ve had to compete against companies that produce steel more cheaply but with higher emissions intensity.  That’s why, earlier this year, the White House stood up a Climate and Trade Task Force, and the task force has been developing the right tools to promote decarbonization and ensure our workers and businesses engaged in cleaner production aren’t disadvantaged by firms overseas engaged in dirtier, exploitative production.
    Critical minerals are another example.  That sector is marked by extreme price volatility, widespread corruption, weak labor and environmental protections, and heavy concentration in the PRC, which artificially drops prices to keep competitors out of the marketplace. 
    If we and our partners fail to invest, the PRC’s domination of these and other supply chains will only grow, and that will leave us increasingly dependent on a country that has demonstrated its willingness to weaponize such dependencies.  We can’t accept that, and neither can our partners. 
    That’s why we are working with them to create a high-standard, critical minerals marketplace, one that diversifies our supply chains, creates a level playing field for our producers, and promotes strong workers’ rights and environmental protections.  And we’re driving towards tangible progress on that idea in just the next few weeks.
    In multiple sectors that are important to our future, not just critical minerals, but solar cells, lithium-ion batteries, electric vehicles, we see a broad pattern emerging.  The PRC is producing far more than domestic demand, dumping excess onto global markets at artificially low prices, driving manufacturers around the world out of business, and creating a chokehold on supply chains.
    To prevent a second China shock, we’ve had to act. 
    That’s what drove the decisions about our 301 tariffs earlier this year.
    Now, we know that indiscriminate, broad-based tariffs will harm workers, consumers, and businesses, both in the United States and our partners.  The evidence on that is clear.  That’s why we chose, instead, to target tariffs at unfair practices in strategic sectors where we and our allies are investing hundreds of billions of dollars to rebuild our manufacturing and our resilience. 
    And crucially, we’re seeing partners in both advanced and emerging economies reach similar conclusions regarding overcapacity and take similar steps to ward off damage to their own industries, from the EU to Canada to Brazil to Thailand to Mexico to Türkiye and beyond.  That’s a big deal.
    And it brings me back to my earlier point: We’re pursuing this new trade approach in concert with our partners.  They also recognize we need modern trade tools to achieve our objectives.  That means considering sector-specific trade agreements.  It means creating markets based on standards when that’s more effective.  And it also means revitalizing international institutions to address today’s challenges, including genuinely reforming the WTO to deal with the challenges I’ve outlined. 
    And it means thinking more comprehensively about our economic partnerships.  That’s why we created the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework and the Americas Partnership for Economic Prosperity.  That’s why we also gave them such catchy names. 
    Within IPEF, we finalized three agreements with 13 partners to accelerate the clean energy transition, to promote high labor standards, to fight corruption, and to shore up supply chain vulnerabilities before they become widespread disruptions.  And within APEP, we’re working to make the Western Hemisphere a globally competitive supply chain hub for semiconductors, clean energy, and more. 
    And that leads to the next question I’ve often been asked in the last year and a half: Where does domestic investment fit into all of this?  How does our positive-sum approach square with our modern industrial strategy?
    The truth is that smart, targeted government investment has always been a crucial part of the American formula.  It’s essential to catalyzing private investment and growth in sectors where market failures or other barriers would lead to under-investment.
    Somehow, we forgot that along the way, or at least we stopped talking about it.  But there was no plausible version of answers on decarbonization or supply chain resilience without recovering this tradition.  And so we have.
    We’ve made the largest investment ever to diversify and accelerate clean energy deployment through the Inflation Reduction Act.  And investments are generating hundreds of billions of dollars in private investment all across the country; rapid growth in emerging climate technologies like sustainable aviation fuels, carbon management, clean hydrogen, with investments increasing 6- to 15-fold from pre-IRA levels. 
    This will help us meet our climate commitments.  This will advance our national security.  And this will ensure that American workers and communities can seize the vast economic opportunities of the clean energy transition and that those opportunities are broadly shared.  And that last part is crucial. 
    The fact is that many communities hard hit in decades past still haven’t bounced back, and the two-thirds of American adults who don’t have college degrees have seen unacceptably poor outcomes in terms of real wages, health, and other outcomes over the last four decades.
    For many years, people assumed that these distributional issues would be solved after the fact by domestic policies.  That has not worked. 
    Advancing fairness, creating high-quality jobs, and revitalizing American communities can’t be an afterthought, which is why we’ve made them central to our approach. 
    In fact, as a result of the incentives in the IRA to build in traditional energy communities, investment in those communities has doubled under President Joe Biden.
    Now, initially, when we rolled this all out, our foreign partners worried that it was designed to undercut them, that we were attempting to shift all the clean energy investment and production around the world to the United States.
    But that wasn’t the case, and it isn’t the case. 
    We know that our partners need to invest.  In fact, we want them to invest.  The whole world benefits from the spillover effects of advances in clean energy that these investments bring. 
    And we are nowhere near the saturation point of investment required to meet our clean energy deployment goals, nor will markets alone generate the resources necessary either. 
    So, we’ve encouraged our partners to invest in their own industrial strength.  We’ve steered U.S. foreign policy towards being a more helpful partner in this endeavor.  And our partners have begun to join us.  Look at Japan’s green transformation policy, India’s production-linked incentives, Canada’s clean energy tax credit, the European Union’s Green Deal.
    As more and more countries adopt this approach, we will continue to build out the cooperative mechanisms that we know will be necessary to ensure that we’re acting together to scale up total global investment, not competing with each other over where a fixed set of investments is located.
    The same goes for investing in our high-tech manufacturing strength.  We believe that a nation that loses the capacity to build, risks losing the capacity to innovate.  So, we’re building again.
    As a result of the CHIPS and Science Act, America is on track to have five leading-edge logic and memory chip manufacturers operating at scale.  No other economy has more than two.  And we’re continuing to nurture American leadership in artificial intelligence, including through actions we’re finalizing, as I speak, to ensure that the physical infrastructure needed to train the next generation of AI models is built right here in the United States. 
    But all of this high-tech investment and development hasn’t come at the expense of our partners.  We’ve done it alongside them. 
    We’re leveraging CHIPS Act funding to make complementary investments in the full semiconductor supply chain, from Costa Rica to Vietnam. 
    We’re building a network of AI safety institutes around the world, from Canada to Singapore to Japan, to harness the power of AI responsibly. 
    And we’ve launched a new Quantum Development Group to deepen cooperation in a field that will be pivotal in the decades ahead.
    Simply put, we’re thinking about how to manage this in concert with our allies and partners, and that will make all of us more competitive.
    Now, all this leads to another question that is frequently asked:  What about your technology protection policies?  How does that fit into a positive-sum approach?
    The United States and our allies and partners have long limited the export of dual-use technologies.  This is logical and uncontroversial.  It doesn’t make sense to allow companies to sell advanced technology to countries that could use them to gain military advantage over the United States and our friends. 
    Now, it would be a mistake to attempt to return to the Cold War paradigm of almost no trade, including technological trade, among geopolitical rivals.  But as I’ve noted, we’re in a fundamentally different geopolitical context, so we’ve got to meet somewhere in the middle. 
    That means being targeted in what we restrict, controlling only the most sensitive technologies that will define national security and strategic competition.  This is part of what we mean when we say: de-risking, not decoupling.
    To strike the right balance, to ensure we’re not imposing controls in an arbitrary or reflexive manner, we have a framework that informs our decision-making.  We ask ourselves at least four questions:
    One, which sensitive technologies are or will likely become foundational to U.S. national security? 
    Two, across those sensitive technologies, where do we have distinct advantages and are likely to see maximal effort by our competitors to close the gap?  Conversely, where are we behind and, therefore, most vulnerable to coercion?
    Three, to what extent do our competitors have immediate substitutes for U.S.-sensitive technology, either through indigenous development or from third countries, that would undercut the controls?
    Four, what is the breadth and depth of the coalition we could plausibly build and sustain around a given control?
    When it comes to a narrow set of sensitive technologies, yes, the fence is high, as it should be. 
    And in the context of broader commerce, the yard is small, and we’re not looking to expand it needlessly.
    Now, beyond the realm of export controls and investment screening, we will also take action to protect sensitive data and our critical infrastructure, such as our recent action on connected vehicles from countries of concern.
    I suspect almost no one here would argue that we should build out our telecommunications architecture or our data center infrastructure with Huawei. 
    Millions of cars on the road with technology from the PRC, getting daily software updates from the PRC, sending reams of information back to the PRC, similarly doesn’t make sense, especially when we’ve already seen evidence of a PRC cyber threat to our critical infrastructure.
    We have to anticipate systemic cyber and data risks in ways that, frankly, we didn’t in the past, including what that means for the future Internet of Things, and we have to take the thoughtful, targeted steps necessary in response.
    This leads to a final, kind of fundamental question: Does this approach reflect some kind of pessimism about the United States and our inherent interests? 
    Quite the contrary.  It reflects an abiding and ambitious optimism.  We believe deeply that we can act smartly and boldly, that we can compete and win, that we can meet the great challenges of our time, and that we can deliver for all of our people here in the United States. 
    And while it’s still very early, we have some evidence of that.  This includes the strongest post-pandemic recovery of any advanced economy in the world.  There’s more work to do, but inflation has come down.  And contrary to the predictions that the PRC would overtake the U.S. in GDP either in this decade or the next, since President Biden took office, the United States has more than doubled our lead.  And last year, the United States attracted more than five times more inbound foreign direct investment than the next highest country. 
    We are once again demonstrating our capacity for resilience and reinvention, and others are noticing.  The EU’s Draghi report, published last month, mirrors key aspects of our strategy. 
    Now, as we continue to implement this vision, we will need to stay rigorous.  We will need, for example, to be bold enough to make the needed investments without veering into unproductive subsidies that crowd-out the private sector or unduly compete with our partners.
    We’re clear-eyed that our policies will involve choices and trade-offs.  That’s the nature of policy.  But to paraphrase Sartre, not to choose is also a choice, and the trade-offs only get worse the longer we leave our challenges unchecked.
    Pointing out that it’s challenging to strike the right balance is not an argument to be satisfied with the status quo.
    We have tried to start making real a new positive-sum vision, and we have tried to start proving out its value.  But we still have our work cut out for us. 
    So I’d actually like to end today with a few questions of my own, where our answers will determine our shared success: 
    First, will we sustain the political will here at home to make the investments in our own national strength that will be required of us in the years ahead? 
    Strategic investments like these need to be a bipartisan priority, and I have to believe that we’ll rise to the occasion, that we won’t needlessly give up America’s position of economic and technological leadership because we can no longer generate the political consensus to invest in ourselves.
    There is more we can do now on a bipartisan basis. 
    For example, Congress still hasn’t appropriated the science part of CHIPS and Science, even while the PRC is increasing its science and technology budget by 10 percent year on year.
    Now, whether we’re talking about investments in fundamental research, or grants and loans for firms developing critical technologies, we also have to update our approach to risk.  Some research paths are dead ends.  Some startups won’t survive.  Our innovation base and our private sector are the envy of the world because they take risks.  The art of managing risk for the sake of innovation is critical to successful geostrategic competition. 
    So, we need to nurture a national comfort with, to paraphrase FDR, bold and persistent experimentation.  And when an investment falls short, as it will, we need to maintain our bipartisan will, dust ourselves off, and keep moving forward.  To put it bluntly, our competitors hope we’re not capable of that.  We need to prove them wrong.  We need to make patient, strategic investments in our capacity to compete, and we need to ensure fiscal sustainability in order to keep making those investments over the long term.
    The second question: Will we allocate sufficient resources for investments that are needed globally? 
    Last year, here at Brookings, I talked about the need to go from billions to trillions in investment to help emerging and developing countries tackle modern challenges, including massively accelerating the speed and scale of the clean energy transition. 
    We need a Marshall Plan-style effort, investing in partners around the world and supporting homegrown U.S. innovation in growing markets like storage, nuclear, and geothermal energy. 
    Now, trillions may sound lofty and unachievable, but there is a very clear path to get there without requiring anywhere near that level of taxpayer dollars, and that path is renewed American leadership and investment in international institutions. 
    For example, at the G20 this fall, we’re spearheading an effort that calls for the international financial institutions, the major creditors in the private sector, to step up their relief for countries facing high debt service burdens so they too can invest in their future. 
    Or consider the World Bank and the IMF.  We’ve been leading the charge to make these institutions bigger and more effective, to fully utilize their balance sheets and be more responsive to the developing and emerging economies they serve.  That has already unlocked hundreds of billions of dollars in new lending capacity, at no cost to the United States.  And we can generate further investment on the scale required with very modest U.S. public investments and legislative fixes.  That depends on Congress taking action. 
    For example, our administration requested $750 million — million — from Congress to boost the World Bank’s lending capacity by over $36 billion, which, if matched by our partners, could generate over $100 billion in new resources.  This would allow the World Bank to deploy $200 for every $1 the taxpayers provide.
    We’ve asked Congress to approve investments in a new trust fund at the IMF to help developing countries build resilience and sustainability.  Through a U.S. investment in the tens of millions, we could enable tens of billions in new IMF lending.
    And outside the World Bank and the IMF, we’re asking Congress to increase funding for the Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment, which we launched at the G7 a couple of years ago. 
    This partnership catalyzes and concentrates investment in key corridors, including Africa and Asia, to close the infrastructure gap in developing countries.  It strengthens countries’ economic growth.  It strengthens America’s supply chains and global trusted technology vendors.  And it strengthens our partnerships in critical regions. 
    The private sector has been enthusiastic.  Together with them and our G7 partners, we’ve already mobilized tens of billions of dollars, and we can lever that up and scale that up in the years ahead with help on a bipartisan basis from the Congress.
    We need to focus on the big picture.  Holding back small sums of money has the effect of pulling back large sums from the developing world — which also, by the way, effectively cedes the field to other countries like the PRC.  There are low-cost, commonsense solutions on the table, steps that should not be the ceiling of our ambitions, but the floor.  And we need Congress to provide us the authorities and the seed funding to take those steps now.
    Finally, will we empower our agencies and develop new muscle to meet this moment? 
    Simply put, we need to ensure that we have the resources and the capabilities in the U.S. government to implement this economic vision over the long haul.  This starts by significantly strengthening our bilateral tools, answering a critique that China has a checkbook and the U.S. has a checklist. 
    Next year, the United States is going to face a critical test of whether our country is up to the task.  The DFC, the Ex-Im Bank, and AGOA, the African Growth and Opportunity Act, are all up for renewal by Congress.  This provides a once-in-a-decade chance for America to strengthen some of its most important tools of economic statecraft. 
    And think about how they can work better with the high-leverage multilateral institutions I just mentioned.  The DFC, for example, is one of our most effective instruments to mobilize private sector investments in developing countries.
    But the DFC is too small compared to the scope of investment needed, and it lacks tools our partners want, like the ability to deploy more equity as well as debt, and it’s often unable to capitalize on fast-moving investment opportunities.  So, we put forward a proposal to expand the DFC’s toolkit and make it bigger, faster, nimbler. 
    Another gap we need to bridge is to make sure we attract, retain, and empower top-tier talent with expertise in priority areas.
    We’re asking Congress to approve the resources we’ve requested for the Commerce’s Bureau of Industry Security, Treasury’s Office of Investment Security, the Department of Justice’s National Security Division. 
    If Congress is serious about America competing and winning, we need to be able to draw on America’s very best.
    Let me close with this:
    Since the end of World War Two, the United States has stood for a fair and open international economy; for the power of global connection to fuel innovation; for the power of trade and investment done right to create good jobs; for the power, as Tocqueville put it, of interest rightly understood.
    Our task ahead is to harness that power to take on the realities of today’s geopolitical moment in a way that will not only preserve America’s enduring strengths, but extend them for generations to come.  It will take more conversations like this one and iteration after iteration to forge a new consensus and perfect a new set of policies and capabilities to match the moment. 
    I hope it’s a project we can all work on together.  We can’t afford not to. 
    So, thank you.  And I look forward to continuing the conversation, including hearing some of your questions this morning. 

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI Security: U.S. Attorney’s Office Recognizes Exceptional Law Enforcement Work at the 2024 Law Enforcement Awards Ceremony

    Source: United States Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco Firearms and Explosives (ATF)

    Burlington, Vermont – On October 23, 2024, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Vermont honored a number of individuals from a variety of law enforcement agencies at the U.S. Attorney’s Office’s Law Enforcement Awards Ceremony. Individual investigators and officers from federal, state, and local agencies were nominated by U.S. Attorney’s Office staff in a variety of categories for their outstanding work supporting the mission of this office and promoting public safety. The specific categories and individuals recognized today are as follows:

    Investigative Achievement Award: This award criteria are established for those individuals, both sworn and non-sworn who have significantly contributed to the mission of the U.S. Attorney’s Office.  

    • Special Agent Samuel Brown, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives – nominated for United States v. Carl Martin.
    • Special Agent Brian Wood, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives – nominated for United States v. Carl Martin.
    • Special Agent Nicholas Call, Food and Drug Administration-Office of Criminal Investigations – nominated for United States v. Paul Bateman, Samir Doshi, and Rebecca Buckley.
    • Resident Agent in Charge Derek Roy, Food and Drug Administration-Office of Criminal Investigations – nominated for United States v. Paul Bateman, Samir Doshi, and Rebecca Buckley.
    • Special Agent Jason Tilley, Food and Drug Administration-Office of Criminal Investigations – nominated for United States v. Paul Bateman, Samir Doshi, and Rebecca Buckley.
    • Financial Investigator Joel Garland, Food and Drug Administration-Office of Criminal Investigations – nominated for United States v. Paul Bateman, Samir Doshi, and Rebecca Buckley.
    • Special Agent Erin Nelligan, Homeland Security Investigations – nominated for United States v. Michael Burton.
    • Special Agent Colin Simons, Federal Bureau of Investigation – nominated for United States v. Eric Colson, Gage Colson, and Antonio Vergara.
    • Detective Sergeant Karl Gardner, Vermont State Police – nominated for United States v. Eric Colson, Gage Colson, and Antonio Vergara.
    • Detective Trooper Steven Fauteux, Vermont State Police – nominated for United States v. Eric Colson, Gage Colson, and Antonio Vergara.
    • Detective Sergeant Aaron Lefebvre, St. Albans Police Department, former Detective with the Vermont Drug Task Force and the Newport Police Department – nominated for United States v. Eric Colson, Gage Colson, and Antonio Vergara.

    Outstanding Collaborative Investigation Award: This category is limited to those who have demonstrated outstanding efforts to overcome significant challenges in collaboration with multiple agencies in order to meet the mission of the U.S. Attorney’s Office.

    • Special Agent Brian Wood, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
    • Special Agent Samuel Brown, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
    • Detective Sergeant Philip Tremblay, Burlington Police Department
    • Drug Enforcement Administration Task Force Officer Durwin Ellerman, Burlington Police Department
    • Sergeant Chase Vivori, Burlington Police Department
    • Special Agent Erin Nelligan, Homeland Security Investigations
      • All nominated for outstanding collaborative investigation in United States v. Ronald Harris, et al.
    • Special Agent Paul Altenburg, Homeland Security Investigations
    • Special Agent Anders Ostrum, Internal Revenue Service-Criminal Investigation
    • Criminal Analyst Nancy Woods, Homeland Security Investigations
    • Resident in Charge Alex Zuchman, Homeland Security Investigations
    • Special Agent Michael DeFiore, U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Division, former Detective Corporal with the Vermont Drug Task Force and the South Burlington Police Department
    • Detective Sergeant Dustin Robinson, Vermont State Police
    • Detective Sergeant Philip Tremblay, Burlington Police Department
    • Special Agent Aaron Dince, Homeland Security Investigations
    • Special Agent Colin Simons, Federal Bureau of Investigation
    • Postal Inspector Jonathan Dunham, U.S. Postal Inspection Service
    • Special Agent Brandon Hope, Drug Enforcement Administration
      • All nominated as their agency representatives for outstanding collaborative investigation for United States v. Dajuan Williams, et al.

    Award recipients gathered today at the U.S. Attorney’s Office, joined by colleagues and family. Each recipient received an engraved award commemorating their outstanding efforts. U.S. Attorney Kerest stated: “This is one of the best days of the year when we have the chance to recognize law enforcement officers like today’s awardees in the presence of their families. Today’s awardees make the work of the U.S. Attorney’s Office possible, and they do that work with the necessary support of their family and loved ones. We applaud their tireless work and the daily sacrifices they all make.”

    MIL Security OSI –

  • MIL-OSI: ACADIA HEALTHCARE SHAREHOLDER ALERT: CLAIMSFILER REMINDS INVESTORS WITH LOSSES IN EXCESS OF $100,000 of Lead Plaintiff Deadline in Class Action Lawsuit Against Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc. – ACHC

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    NEW ORLEANS, Oct. 23, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — ClaimsFiler, a FREE shareholder information service, reminds investors that they have until December 16, 2024 to file lead plaintiff applications in a securities class action lawsuit against Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc. (NasdaqGS: ACHC), if they purchased the Company’s securities between February 28, 2020 and October 18, 2024, inclusive (the “Class Period”). This action is pending in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee.

    Get Help

    Acadia Healthcare investors should visit us at https://claimsfiler.com/cases/nasdaq-achc-1/ or call toll-free (844) 367-9658. Lawyers at Kahn Swick & Foti, LLC are available to discuss your legal options.

    About the Lawsuit

    Acadia and certain of its executives are charged with failing to disclose material information during the Class Period, violating federal securities laws.

    On September 27, 2024, the Company disclosed the receipt of a voluntary request for information from the U. S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York as well as a grand jury subpoena from the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri “related to its admissions, length of stay and billing practices.” On this news, the price of Acadia’s shares fell by $12.38 per share, or 16.36%, to close at $63.28 on September 27, 2024. Then, on October 18, 2024, The New York Times published a report entitled “Veterans Dept. Investigating Acadia Healthcare for Insurance Fraud” that highlighted claims regarding the Company’s billing and patient holding and discharge practices. On this news, the price of Acadia’s shares fell by $7.29 per share, or 12.28%, to close at $52.03 on October 18, 2024.

    The case is Kachrodia v. Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc., No. 24-cv-01238.

    About ClaimsFiler

    ClaimsFiler has a single mission: to serve as the information source to help retail investors recover their share of billions of dollars from securities class action settlements. At ClaimsFiler.com, investors can: (1) register for free to gain access to information and settlement websites for various securities class action cases so they can timely submit their own claims; (2) upload their portfolio transactional data to be notified about relevant securities cases in which they may have a financial interest; and (3) submit inquiries to the Kahn Swick & Foti, LLC law firm for free case evaluations.

    To learn more about ClaimsFiler, visit www.claimsfiler.com.

    The MIL Network –

  • MIL-OSI Australia: UPDATE: Call for information – Injuries – Alice Springs

    Source: Northern Territory Police and Fire Services

    Northern Territory Police are calling for information after a man suffered serious injuries in Alice Springs yesterday.

    Sometime in the late afternoon, the 67-year-old man returned home to his residence on the corner of Breaden Rd and Gap Rd, where he was later located with serious non-life-threatening injuries.

    He was conveyed to Alice Springs Hospital with injuries to his head and upper body.

    Initial reports suggested the man had been assaulted. After further investigations police now believe the man has fallen, causing his injuries.

    Investigations are still ongoing, and police urge anyone with information, including CCTV or dashcam footage, or who witnessed the incident to make contact on 131 444 and reference NTP2400107134.

    Anonymous reports can also be made through Crime Stoppers on 1800 333 000 or via https://crimestoppersnt.com.au/.

    MIL OSI News –