Category: Finance

  • MIL-OSI Security: Man who funded terrorist fighter in Syria sentenced following a Met counter terrorism investigation

    Source: United Kingdom London Metropolitan Police

    A man who sent money to his nephew in Syria knowing it was to fund his terrorist activity has been sentenced for terrorism offences following an investigation by specialist officers from the Met’s Counter Terrorism Command.

    Through their investigation, detectives found that 46-year-old Farhad Mohammad arranged for $350.00 over two payments to be sent to his nephew, Idris Usman. However, the investigation uncovered that Usman was fighting in Syria at the time for the terrorist group Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham, which is a proscribed organisation in the UK.

    On 26 April, Mohammad was found guilty of two terrorism funding offences following a ten-day trial at the Old Bailey. He was sentenced on 23 October to a three year community order, 250 hours unpaid work, three month curfew between 9pm and 8am and a 30 day Rehabilitation Supervision Order.

    During the trial, counter terrorism investigators presented evidence showing Mohammad made two payments to his nephew in the space of three months between November 2017 and January 2018 with the knowledge that his nephew was fighting for an Islamist terrorist group in Syria at the time.

    One of the messages found by officers on Mohammad’s phone from his nephew in May 2017 read: “Uncle forgive me, God willing I am going to participate in a fighting, either I will stay alive or I become a martyr, it is up to God.”

    After initial enquiries were carried out by officers from the Eastern Region Special Operations Unit (ERSOU), the investigation was taken on by specialist investigators within the National Terrorist Financial Investigation Unit, which is based within the Met’s Counter Terrorism Command. Detectives identified that the money, which was sent between November 2017 and January 2018, was transferred via a third-party to Usman.

    As a result of meticulous investigative work, Counter Terrorism officers were able to prove that Mohammad was fully aware that the money he was sending was supporting his nephew’s terrorist activities.

    Another example of a message found by officers from Usman to Mohammad in June 2017, indicating he was aware of his terrorist activities read: “Uncle for the sake of God send me six and a half waraqa ($650), to buy a weapon, it is the one, which I like it, and may God reward you with good.” Also among the messages sent from Usman to his Uncle was an image sent in August 2017 showing Usman sat on a motorbike with a gun over his shoulder.

    Commander Dominic Murphy, who leads the Met’s Counter Terrorism Command, said: “Terrorist groups rely on financial support and funding to be able to operate. While Mohammad’s contributions may not have been vast sums, he was well aware his nephew wanted the money to purchase a firearm and to help fund his fighting in Syria.

    “Groups like Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham cause huge misery, terror and devastation. If you knowingly fund someone – family member or not – who is part of a group like that, then it is helping a terrorist organisation and it is something we take extremely seriously.”

    On 27 February 2018, Mohammad planned to travel to Turkey from London Stansted airport. However, before he boarded the flight, he was stopped by officers using powers under Schedule 7 of the Terrorism Act, 2000.

    Officers found he had over £4,000 of cash, and three mobile phones – all of which were seized and the contents downloaded by officers, with Mohammad subsequently arrested.

    Detectives recovered messaging app conversations and voice notes, which, after careful piecing together, officers were able to use to produce a timeline of detailing his conversations and fund transfers.

    Commander Murphy added: “The use of counter terrorism powers by officers at the airport was crucial in discovering how Mohammad was knowingly funding his nephew’s terrorist activities in Syria. And it was the specialist skills of officers within our National Terrorist Financial Investigation Unit which helped pinpoint the transactions that led to this prosecution.

    “Anyone who might be considering providing financial support to terrorists or terrorist organisations should think twice, as it is a serious offence and, as we’ve shown here, we will investigate those who are involved in this kind of activity.”

    Farhad Mohammad, 46, (21.10.1978) of Colchester, Essex was charged on 10 July 2023.

    He was found guilty on Friday 26 April 2024 of two counts of terrorist fundraising (contrary to section 17 of the Terrorism Act 2000), after a trial at the Old Bailey and was sentenced at the same court on 23 October. Mohammad was found not guilty on two other counts of terrorist fundraising – linked to alleged payments made in May and August 2017. The jury was unable to reach a verdict in respect of a fifth count of terrorist fundraising, relating to an alleged payment made in October 2017. This count will lie on file.

    The National Terrorist Financial Investigation Unit (NTFIU) is based within the Met’s Counter Terrorism Command and is comprised of specialist investigators, analysts and researchers who investigate suspicious financial activity where they believe it may have links to terrorism.

    Communities defeat terrorism, and information from the public is vital to counter terrorism investigations. If you see or hear something unusual or suspicious and think someone may be engaging in terrorist activity, trust your instincts and act by reporting it in confidence at www.gov.uk/ACT or call the anti-terrorist hotline on 0800 789 321.

    In an emergency, always dial 999.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI: Southside Bancshares, Inc. Announces Financial Results for the Third Quarter Ended September 30, 2024

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    • Third quarter net income of $20.5 million;
    • Third quarter earnings per diluted common share of $0.68;
    • Annualized return on third quarter average assets of 0.98%;
    • Annualized return on third quarter average tangible common equity of 13.69%(1); and
    • Nonperforming assets remain low at 0.09% of total assets. 

    TYLER, Texas, Oct. 24, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Southside Bancshares, Inc. (“Southside” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ: SBSI) today reported its financial results for the quarter ended September 30, 2024. Southside reported net income of $20.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2024, an increase of $2.1 million, or 11.2%, compared to $18.4 million for the same period in 2023. Earnings per diluted common share increased $0.08, or 13.3%, to $0.68 for the three months ended September 30, 2024, from $0.60 for the same period in 2023. The annualized return on average shareholders’ equity for the three months ended September 30, 2024, was 10.13%, compared to 9.50% for the same period in 2023. The annualized return on average assets was 0.98% for the three months ended September 30, 2024, compared to 0.93% for the same period in 2023. 

    “Third quarter financial results were highlighted by a linked quarter $1.86 million increase in net interest income, a linked quarter eight basis point increase in our net interest margin to 2.95%, earnings per share of $0.68, a 13.69% return on average tangible equity(1), and continued strong asset quality,” stated Lee R. Gibson, Chief Executive Officer of Southside. “During the quarter we sold $28 million of lower yielding municipal securities, unwound the related fair value swaps and recorded a loss of $1.9 million. The proceeds were reinvested in higher yielding agency mortgage-backed securities. In addition, we recorded an impairment charge of $868,000 on the sale of approximately $10 million of available for sale (“AFS”) municipal securities and the unwind of the related fair value swaps on October 1.” 

    Operating Results for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2024 

    Net income was $20.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2024, compared to $18.4 million for the same period in 2023, an increase of $2.1 million, or 11.2%. Earnings per diluted common share were $0.68 and $0.60 for the three months ended September 30, 2024 and 2023, respectively. The increase in net income was a result of the increase in net interest income and the decrease in provision for credit losses, partially offset by the decrease in noninterest income and increases in noninterest expense and income tax expense. Annualized returns on average assets and average shareholders’ equity for the three months ended September 30, 2024 were 0.98% and 10.13%, respectively, compared to 0.93% and 9.50%, respectively, for the three months ended September 30, 2023. Our efficiency ratio and tax-equivalent efficiency ratio(1) were 53.94% and 51.90%, respectively, for the three months ended September 30, 2024, compared to 54.86% and 52.29%, respectively, for the three months ended September 30, 2023, and 54.90% and 52.71%, respectively, for the three months ended June 30, 2024. 

    Net interest income for the three months ended September 30, 2024 was $55.5 million, an increase of $2.2 million, or 4.1%, from the same period in 2023. The increase in net interest income was due to the increases in the average balance and the average yield of interest earning assets, partially offset by increases in the average rate paid on our interest bearing liabilities and average balance of our interest bearing liabilities. Linked quarter, net interest income increased $1.9 million, or 3.5%, compared to $53.6 million during the three months ended June 30, 2024, largely due to the increase in the average yield on our interest earning assets and the decrease in the average rate paid on our interest bearing liabilities, partially offset by the decrease in the average balance of interest earning assets. 

    Our net interest margin and tax-equivalent net interest margin(1) decreased to 2.82% and 2.95%, respectively, for the three months ended September 30, 2024, compared to 2.85% and 3.02%, respectively, for the same period in 2023. Linked quarter, net interest margin and tax-equivalent net interest margin(1) increased from 2.74% and 2.87%, respectively for the three months ended June 30, 2024. 

    Noninterest income was $8.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2024, a decrease of $2.7 million, or 24.6%, compared to $10.8 million for the same period in 2023. The decrease was due to a net loss on sale of securities AFS and decreases in other noninterest income and deposit services income, partially offset by an increase in brokerage services income. On a linked quarter basis, noninterest income decreased $3.4 million, or 29.3%, compared to the three months ended June 30, 2024. The decrease was primarily due to an increase in net loss on sale of securities AFS and decreases in other noninterest income and bank owned life insurance income related to a $1.0 million death benefit realized in the second quarter of 2024. The decrease in other noninterest income for both periods was primarily due to an impairment charge of $868,000 on the sale of approximately $10 million of AFS municipal securities and the unwind of the related fair value swaps on October 1. 

    Noninterest expense increased $0.8 million, or 2.2%, to $36.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2024, compared to $35.6 million for the same period in 2023, due to increases in salaries and employee benefits and software and data processing expense, partially offset by decreases in advertising, travel and entertainment expense, professional fees, net occupancy expense and amortization of intangibles. On a linked quarter basis, noninterest expense increased by $0.6 million, or 1.6%, compared to the three months ended June 30, 2024, due to increases in other noninterest expense, salaries and employee benefits expense and professional fees. 

    Income tax expense increased $1.3 million, or 40.7%, for the three months ended September 30, 2024, compared to the same period in 2023. On a linked quarter basis, income tax expense decreased $0.8 million, or 15.8%. Our effective tax rate (“ETR”) increased to 17.6% for the three months ended September 30, 2024, compared to 14.5% for the three months ended September 30, 2023, and increased slightly from 17.4% for the three months ended June 30, 2024. The higher ETR for the three months ended September 30, 2024 compared to the same period in 2023, was primarily due to a decrease in tax-exempt income as a percentage of pre-tax income. 

    Operating Results for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2024 

    Net income was $66.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2024, compared to $69.4 million for the same period in 2023, a decrease of $2.7 million, or 3.8%. Earnings per diluted common share were $2.20 for the nine months ended September 30, 2024, compared to $2.24 for the same period in 2023, a decrease of 1.8%. The decrease in net income was primarily a result of the decrease in noninterest income and increases in noninterest expense and income tax expense, partially offset by the decrease in provision for credit losses and the increase in net interest income. Returns on average assets and average shareholders’ equity for the nine months ended September 30, 2024 were 1.06% and 11.19%, respectively, compared to 1.20% and 12.21%, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2023. Our efficiency ratio and tax-equivalent efficiency ratio(1) were 55.56% and 53.35%, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2024, compared to 53.99% and 51.44%, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2023. 

    Net interest income was $162.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2024, compared to $160.5 million for the same period in 2023, an increase of $1.9 million, or 1.2%, due to increases in the average balance and the average yield of interest earning assets, partially offset by increases in the average rate paid on our interest bearing liabilities and average balance of our interest bearing liabilities. 

    Our net interest margin and tax-equivalent net interest margin(1) were 2.76% and 2.90%, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2024, compared to 2.95% and 3.13%, respectively, for the same period in 2023. 

    Noninterest income was $29.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2024, a decrease of $3.9 million, or 11.6%, compared to $33.3 million for the same period in 2023. The decrease was due to decreases in the net gain on sale of equity securities, other noninterest income and deposit services income and a loss on sale of loans, partially offset by a decrease in net loss on sale of securities AFS and an increase in brokerage services income. The decrease in other noninterest income was primarily due to an impairment charge of $868,000 on the sale of approximately $10 million of AFS municipal securities and the unwind of the related fair value swaps on October 1. 

    Noninterest expense was $109.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2024, compared to $105.4 million for the same period in 2023, an increase of $3.6 million, or 3.4%. The increase was primarily due to increases in salaries and employee benefits and software and data processing expense, partially offset by decreases in professional fees, net occupancy expense, advertising, travel and entertainment expense, and amortization of intangibles. 

    Income tax expense increased $2.0 million, or 16.3%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2024, compared to the same period in 2023. Our ETR was approximately 17.6% and 15.0% for the nine months ended September 30, 2024 and 2023, respectively. The higher ETR for the nine months ended September 30, 2024, as compared to the same period in 2023, was primarily due to a decrease in tax-exempt income as a percentage of pre-tax income. 

    Balance Sheet Data 

    At September 30, 2024, Southside had $8.36 billion in total assets, compared to $8.28 billion at December 31, 2023 and $7.97 billion at September 30, 2023. 

    Loans at September 30, 2024 were $4.58 billion, an increase of $157.4 million, or 3.6%, compared to $4.42 billion at September 30, 2023. Linked quarter, loans decreased $11.3 million, or 0.2%, due to decreases of $50.2 million in commercial real estate loans, $14.9 million in municipal loans, $2.4 million in loans to individuals and $1.0 million in commercial loans. These decreases were partially offset by increases of $39.8 million in construction loans and $17.4 million in 1-4 family residential loans. 

    Securities at September 30, 2024 were $2.70 billion, an increase of $53.4 million, or 2.0%, compared to $2.64 billion at September 30, 2023. Linked quarter, securities decreased $15.1 million, or 0.6%, from $2.71 billion at June 30, 2024. 

    Deposits at September 30, 2024 were $6.44 billion, an increase of $86.1 million, or 1.4%, compared to $6.35 billion at September 30, 2023. Linked quarter, deposits decreased $60.2 million, or 0.9%, from $6.50 billion at June 30, 2024. 

    At September 30, 2024, we had 179,214 total deposit accounts with an average balance of $32,000. Our estimated uninsured deposits were 35.9% as of September 30, 2024. When excluding affiliate deposits (Southside-owned deposits) and public fund deposits (all collateralized), our total estimated deposits without insurance or collateral was 19.2% as of September 30, 2024. Our noninterest bearing deposits represent approximately 21.4% of total deposits. Linked quarter, our cost of interest bearing deposits remained consistent at 3.01%. Linked quarter, our cost of total deposits decreased one basis point from 2.39% in the prior quarter to 2.38%. 

    Our cost of interest bearing deposits increased 83 basis points, from 2.16% for the nine months ended September 30, 2023, to 2.99% for the nine months ended September 30, 2024. Our cost of total deposits increased 75 basis points, from 1.62% for the nine months ended September 30, 2023, to 2.37% for the nine months ended September 30, 2024. 

    Capital Resources and Liquidity 

    Our capital ratios and contingent liquidity sources remain solid. During the third quarter ended September 30, 2024, we did not purchase any common stock pursuant to our Stock Repurchase Plan. Under this plan, repurchases of our outstanding common stock may be carried out in open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions or pursuant to any trading plan that might be adopted in accordance with Rule 10b5-1 of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The Company has no obligation to repurchase any shares under the Stock Repurchase Plan and may modify, suspend or discontinue the plan at any time. We have not purchased any common stock pursuant to the Stock Repurchase Plan subsequent to September 30, 2024. 

    As of September 30, 2024, our total available contingent liquidity, net of current outstanding borrowings, was $2.23 billion, consisting of FHLB advances, Federal Reserve Discount Window and correspondent bank lines of credit. 

    Asset Quality 

    Nonperforming assets at September 30, 2024 were $7.7 million, or 0.09% of total assets, an increase of $3.3 million, or 74.8%, compared to $4.4 million, or 0.05% of total assets, at September 30, 2023. Linked quarter, nonperforming assets increased $0.7 million, or 10.7%, from $6.9 million at June 30, 2024 due primarily to an increase of $1.1 million, or 18.7%, in nonaccrual loans, partially offset by decreases of $0.1 million in restructured loans and $0.3 million in other real estate owned. 

    The allowance for loan losses totaled $44.3 million, or 0.97% of total loans, at September 30, 2024, compared to $42.4 million, or 0.92% of total loans, at June 30, 2024. The increase in the allowance as a percentage of total assets was primarily due to the increased economic concerns forecasted in the CECL model specific to office and multifamily markets in metro areas. The allowance for loan losses was $41.8 million, or 0.94% of total loans, at September 30, 2023. 

    For the three months ended September 30, 2024, we recorded a provision for credit losses for loans of $2.3 million, compared to a provision of $6.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2023, and a reversal of provision of $0.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2024. Net charge-offs were $0.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2024, compared to net charge-offs of $0.9 million and $0.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2023 and June 30, 2024, respectively. Net charge-offs were $1.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2024, compared to net charge-offs of $1.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2023. 

    We recorded a provision for credit losses on off-balance-sheet credit exposures of $0.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2024, compared to $0.6 million and $0.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2023 and June 30, 2024, respectively. We recorded a reversal of provision for credit losses for off-balance-sheet credit exposures of $0.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2024, compared to a provision for credit losses on off-balance-sheet credit exposures of $0.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2023. The balance of the allowance for off-balance-sheet credit exposures was $3.3 million and $3.9 million at September 30, 2024 and 2023, respectively, and is included in other liabilities. 

    Dividend 

    Southside Bancshares, Inc. declared a third quarter cash dividend of $0.36 per share on August 8, 2024, which was paid on September 5, 2024, to all shareholders of record as of August 22, 2024. 

    _______________ 

    (1) Refer to “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” below and to “Non-GAAP Reconciliation” at the end of the financial statement tables in this Earnings Release for more information and for a reconciliation of this non-GAAP financial measure to the nearest GAAP financial measure. 

    Conference Call 

    Southside’s management team will host a conference call to discuss its third quarter ended September 30, 2024 financial results on Thursday, October 24, 2024 at 11:00 a.m. CDT. The conference call can be accessed by webcast, for listen-only mode, on the company website, https://investors.southside.com, under Events. 

    Those interested in participating in the question and answer session, or others who prefer to call-in, can register at https://register.vevent.com/register/BIe280e5ecbf444a68a5836f1e27caa8a9 to receive the dial-in number and unique code to access the conference call seamlessly. While not required, it is recommended that those wishing to participate, register 10 minutes prior to the conference call to ensure a more efficient registration process. 

    For those unable to attend the live event, a webcast recording will be available on the company website, https://investors.southside.com, for at least 30 days, beginning approximately two hours following the conference call. 

    Non-GAAP Financial Measures 

    Our accounting and reporting policies conform to generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) in the United States and prevailing practices in the banking industry. However, certain non-GAAP measures are used by management to supplement the evaluation of our performance. These include the following fully taxable-equivalent measures (“FTE”): (i) Net interest income (FTE), (ii) net interest margin (FTE), (iii) net interest spread (FTE), and (iv) efficiency ratio (FTE), which include the effects of taxable-equivalent adjustments using a federal income tax rate of 21% to increase tax-exempt interest income to a tax-equivalent basis. Interest income earned on certain assets is completely or partially exempt from federal income tax. As such, these tax-exempt instruments typically yield lower returns than taxable investments. 

    Net interest income (FTE), net interest margin (FTE) and net interest spread (FTE). Net interest income (FTE) is a non-GAAP measure that adjusts for the tax-favored status of net interest income from certain loans and investments and is not permitted under GAAP in the consolidated statements of income. We believe this measure to be the preferred industry measurement of net interest income and that it enhances comparability of net interest income arising from taxable and tax-exempt sources. The most directly comparable financial measure calculated in accordance with GAAP is our net interest income. Net interest margin (FTE) is the ratio of net interest income (FTE) to average earning assets. The most directly comparable financial measure calculated in accordance with GAAP is our net interest margin. Net interest spread (FTE) is the difference in the average yield on average earning assets on a tax-equivalent basis and the average rate paid on average interest bearing liabilities. The most directly comparable financial measure calculated in accordance with GAAP is our net interest spread. 

    Efficiency ratio (FTE). The efficiency ratio (FTE) is a non-GAAP measure that provides a measure of productivity in the banking industry. This ratio is calculated to measure the cost of generating one dollar of revenue. The ratio is designed to reflect the percentage of one dollar which must be expended to generate that dollar of revenue. We calculate this ratio by dividing noninterest expense, excluding amortization expense on intangibles and certain nonrecurring expense by the sum of net interest income (FTE) and noninterest income, excluding net gain (loss) on sale of securities available for sale and certain nonrecurring impairments. The most directly comparable financial measure calculated in accordance with GAAP is our efficiency ratio. 

    These non-GAAP financial measures should not be considered alternatives to GAAP-basis financial statements and other bank holding companies may define or calculate these non-GAAP measures or similar measures differently. Whenever we present a non-GAAP financial measure in an SEC filing, we are also required to present the most directly comparable financial measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP and reconcile the differences between the non-GAAP financial measure and such comparable GAAP measure. 

    Management believes adjusting net interest income, net interest margin and net interest spread to a fully taxable-equivalent basis is a standard practice in the banking industry as these measures provide useful information to make peer comparisons. Tax-equivalent adjustments are reflected in the respective earning asset categories as listed in the “Average Balances with Average Yields and Rates” tables. 

    A reconciliation of our non-GAAP financial measures to the comparable GAAP financial measures is included at the end of the financial statement tables. 

    About Southside Bancshares, Inc. 

    Southside Bancshares, Inc. is a bank holding company with approximately $8.36 billion in assets as of September 30, 2024, that owns 100% of Southside Bank. Southside Bank currently has 54 branches in Texas and operates a network of 73 ATMs/ITMs. 

    To learn more about Southside Bancshares, Inc., please visit our investor relations website at https://investors.southside.com. Our investor relations site provides a detailed overview of our activities, financial information and historical stock price data. To receive email notification of company news, events and stock activity, please register on the website under Resources and Investor Email Alerts. Questions or comments may be directed to Lindsey Bailes at (903) 630-7965, or lindsey.bailes@southside.com. 

    Forward-Looking Statements 

    Certain statements of other than historical fact that are contained in this press release and in other written materials, documents and oral statements issued by or on behalf of the Company may be considered to be “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of and subject to the safe harbor protections of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance, nor should they be relied upon as representing management’s views as of any subsequent date. These statements may include words such as “expect,” “estimate,” “project,” “anticipate,” “appear,” “believe,” “could,” “should,” “may,” “might,” “will,” “would,” “seek,” “intend,” “probability,” “risk,” “goal,” “target,” “objective,” “plans,” “potential,” and similar expressions. Forward-looking statements are statements with respect to the Company’s beliefs, plans, expectations, objectives, goals, anticipations, assumptions, estimates, intentions and future performance and are subject to significant known and unknown risks and uncertainties, which could cause the Company’s actual results to differ materially from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements. For example, benefits of the Share Repurchase Plan, trends in asset quality, capital, liquidity, the Company’s ability to sell nonperforming assets, expense reductions, planned operational efficiencies and earnings from growth and certain market risk disclosures, including the impact of interest rates and our expectations regarding rate increases, tax reform, inflation, the impacts related to or resulting from other economic factors are based upon information presently available to management and are dependent on choices about key model characteristics and assumptions and are subject to various limitations. By their nature, certain of the market risk disclosures are only estimates and could be materially different from what actually occurs in the future. Accordingly, our results could materially differ from those that have been estimated. The most significant factor that could cause future results to differ materially from those anticipated by our forward-looking statements include the ongoing impact of higher inflation levels, interest rate fluctuations and general economic and recessionary concerns, all of which could impact economic growth and could cause a reduction in financial transactions and business activities, including decreased deposits and reduced loan originations, our ability to manage liquidity in a rapidly changing and unpredictable market, labor shortages and changes in interest rates by the Federal Reserve. 

    Additional information concerning the Company and its business, including additional factors that could materially affect the Company’s financial results, is included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023, under “Part I – Item 1. Forward Looking Information” and “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors” and in the Company’s other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company disclaims any obligation to update any factors or to announce publicly the result of revisions to any of the forward-looking statements included herein to reflect future events or developments. 

     
    Southside Bancshares, Inc.
    Consolidated Financial Summary (Unaudited)
    (Dollars in thousands)
     
      As of
        2024       2023  
      Sep 30,   Jun 30,   Mar 31,   Dec 31,   Sep 30,
    ASSETS                  
    Cash and due from banks $ 130,147     $ 114,283     $ 96,744     $ 122,021     $ 105,601  
    Interest earning deposits   333,825       272,469       307,257       391,719       106,094  
    Federal funds sold   22,325       65,244       65,372       46,770       114,128  
    Securities available for sale, at estimated fair value   1,408,437       1,405,944       1,405,221       1,296,294       1,335,560  
    Securities held to maturity, at net carrying value   1,288,403       1,305,975       1,306,898       1,307,053       1,307,886  
    Total securities   2,696,840       2,711,919       2,712,119       2,603,347       2,643,446  
    Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost   40,291       32,991       27,958       11,936       12,778  
    Loans held for sale   768       1,352       756       10,894       1,382  
    Loans   4,578,048       4,589,365       4,577,368       4,524,510       4,420,633  
    Less: Allowance for loan losses   (44,276 )     (42,407 )     (43,557 )     (42,674 )     (41,760 )
    Net loans   4,533,772       4,546,958       4,533,811       4,481,836       4,378,873  
    Premises & equipment, net   138,811       138,489       139,491       138,950       139,473  
    Goodwill   201,116       201,116       201,116       201,116       201,116  
    Other intangible assets, net   2,003       2,281       2,588       2,925       3,295  
    Bank owned life insurance   137,489       136,903       136,604       136,330       135,737  
    Other assets   124,876       133,697       130,047       137,070       130,545  
    Total assets $ 8,362,263     $ 8,357,702     $ 8,353,863     $ 8,284,914     $ 7,972,468  
                       
    LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY                  
    Noninterest bearing deposits $ 1,377,022     $ 1,366,924     $ 1,358,827     $ 1,390,407     $ 1,431,285  
    Interest bearing deposits   5,058,680       5,129,008       5,186,933       5,159,274       4,918,286  
    Total deposits   6,435,702       6,495,932       6,545,760       6,549,681       6,349,571  
    Other borrowings and Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings   865,856       763,700       770,151       722,468       608,038  
    Subordinated notes, net of unamortized debt
    issuance costs
      92,006       91,970       93,913       93,877       93,838  
    Trust preferred subordinated debentures, net of unamortized debt issuance costs   60,273       60,272       60,271       60,270       60,269  
    Other liabilities   103,172       144,858       95,846       85,330       132,157  
    Total liabilities   7,557,009       7,556,732       7,565,941       7,511,626       7,243,873  
    Shareholders’ equity   805,254       800,970       787,922       773,288       728,595  
    Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity $ 8,362,263     $ 8,357,702     $ 8,353,863     $ 8,284,914     $ 7,972,468  
     
    Southside Bancshares, Inc.
    Consolidated Financial Highlights (Unaudited)
    (Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)
     
      Three Months Ended
        2024       2023  
      Sep 30,   Jun 30,   Mar 31,   Dec 31,   Sep 30,
    Income Statement:                  
    Total interest income $ 105,703     $ 104,186     $ 102,758     $ 98,939     $ 93,078  
    Total interest expense   50,239       50,578       49,410       44,454       39,805  
    Net interest income   55,464       53,608       53,348       54,485       53,273  
    Provision for (reversal of) credit losses   2,389       (485 )     58       2,281       6,987  
    Net interest income after provision for (reversal of) credit losses   53,075       54,093       53,290       52,204       46,286  
    Noninterest income                  
    Deposit services   6,199       6,157       5,985       6,305       6,479  
    Net gain (loss) on sale of securities available for sale   (1,929 )     (563 )     (18 )     (10,386 )     11  
    Gain (loss) on sale of loans   115       220       (436 )     178       96  
    Trust fees   1,628       1,456       1,336       1,431       1,522  
    Bank owned life insurance   857       1,767       784       2,602       790  
    Brokerage services   1,068       1,081       1,014       944       760  
    Other   233       1,439       1,059       1,427       1,178  
    Total noninterest income   8,171       11,557       9,724       2,501       10,836  
    Noninterest expense                  
    Salaries and employee benefits   22,233       21,984       23,113       21,152       21,241  
    Net occupancy   3,613       3,750       3,362       3,474       3,796  
    Advertising, travel & entertainment   734       795       950       1,127       1,062  
    ATM expense   412       368       325       318       358  
    Professional fees   1,206       1,075       1,154       1,315       1,472  
    Software and data processing   2,951       2,860       2,856       2,644       2,432  
    Communications   423       410       449       435       359  
    FDIC insurance   939       977       943       892       902  
    Amortization of intangibles   278       307       337       370       407  
    Other   3,543       3,239       3,392       3,456       3,524  
    Total noninterest expense   36,332       35,765       36,881       35,183       35,553  
    Income before income tax expense   24,914       29,885       26,133       19,522       21,569  
    Income tax expense   4,390       5,212       4,622       2,206       3,120  
    Net income $ 20,524     $ 24,673     $ 21,511     $ 17,316     $ 18,449  
                       
    Common Share Data:      
    Weighted-average basic shares outstanding   30,286       30,280       30,262       30,235       30,502  
    Weighted-average diluted shares outstanding   30,370       30,312       30,305       30,276       30,543  
    Common shares outstanding end of period   30,308       30,261       30,284       30,249       30,338  
    Earnings per common share                  
    Basic $ 0.68     $ 0.81     $ 0.71     $ 0.57     $ 0.60  
    Diluted   0.68       0.81       0.71       0.57       0.60  
    Book value per common share   26.57       26.47       26.02       25.56       24.02  
    Tangible book value per common share   19.87       19.75       19.29       18.82       17.28  
    Cash dividends paid per common share   0.36       0.36       0.36       0.37       0.35  
                       
    Selected Performance Ratios:                  
    Return on average assets   0.98 %     1.19 %     1.03 %     0.85 %     0.93 %
    Return on average shareholders’ equity   10.13       12.46       11.02       9.31       9.50  
    Return on average tangible common equity (1)   13.69       16.90       15.07       13.10       13.17  
    Average yield on earning assets (FTE) (1)   5.51       5.45       5.38       5.30       5.15  
    Average rate on interest bearing liabilities   3.28       3.32       3.22       3.04       2.84  
    Net interest margin (FTE) (1)   2.95       2.87       2.86       2.99       3.02  
    Net interest spread (FTE) (1)   2.23       2.13       2.16       2.26       2.31  
    Average earning assets to average interest bearing liabilities   128.51       128.62       127.71       131.65       133.24  
    Noninterest expense to average total assets   1.73       1.72       1.77       1.73       1.79  
    Efficiency ratio (FTE) (1)   51.90       52.71       55.54       50.86       52.29  

    (1)  Refer to “Non-GAAP Reconciliation” at the end of the financial statement tables in this Earnings Release for a reconciliation of this non-GAAP financial measure to the nearest GAAP financial measure. 

     
    Southside Bancshares, Inc.
    Consolidated Financial Highlights (Unaudited)
    (Dollars in thousands)
     
      Three Months Ended
        2024       2023  
      Sep 30,   Jun 30,   Mar 31,   Dec 31,   Sep 30,
    Nonperforming Assets: $ 7,656     $ 6,918     $ 7,979     $ 4,001     $ 4,381  
    Nonaccrual loans   7,254       6,110       7,709       3,889       4,316  
    Accruing loans past due more than 90 days                            
    Restructured loans         145       151       13       15  
    Other real estate owned   388       648       119       99       50  
    Repossessed assets   14       15                    
                       
    Asset Quality Ratios:                  
    Ratio of nonaccruing loans to:                  
    Total loans   0.16 %     0.13 %     0.17 %     0.09 %     0.10 %
    Ratio of nonperforming assets to:                  
    Total assets   0.09       0.08       0.10       0.05       0.05  
    Total loans   0.17       0.15       0.17       0.09       0.10  
    Total loans and OREO   0.17       0.15       0.17       0.09       0.10  
    Ratio of allowance for loan losses to:                  
    Nonaccruing loans   610.37       694.06       565.01       1,097.30       967.56  
    Nonperforming assets   578.32       613.00       545.90       1,066.58       953.21  
    Total loans   0.97       0.92       0.95       0.94       0.94  
    Net charge-offs (recoveries) to average loans outstanding   0.04       0.02       0.03       0.11       0.08  
                       
    Capital Ratios:                  
    Shareholders’ equity to total assets   9.63       9.58       9.43       9.33       9.14  
    Common equity tier 1 capital   13.07       12.72       12.43       12.28       12.27  
    Tier 1 risk-based capital   14.12       13.76       13.47       13.32       13.31  
    Total risk-based capital   16.59       16.16       15.92       15.73       15.71  
    Tier 1 leverage capital   9.61       9.40       9.22       9.39       9.61  
    Period end tangible equity to period end tangible assets (1)   7.38       7.33       7.17       7.04       6.75  
    Average shareholders’ equity to average total assets   9.67       9.52       9.35       9.13       9.76  

    (1)  Refer to the “Non-GAAP Reconciliation” at the end of the financial statement tables in this Earnings Release for a reconciliation of this non-GAAP financial measure to the nearest GAAP financial measure. 

     
    Southside Bancshares, Inc.
    Consolidated Financial Highlights (Unaudited)
    (Dollars in thousands)
     
      Three Months Ended
        2024       2023  
    Loan Portfolio Composition Sep 30,   Jun 30,   Mar 31,   Dec 31,   Sep 30,
    Real Estate Loans:                  
    Construction $ 585,817     $ 546,040     $ 599,464     $ 789,744     $ 720,515  
    1-4 Family Residential   755,406       738,037       720,508       696,738       689,492  
    Commercial   2,422,612       2,472,771       2,413,345       2,168,451       2,117,306  
    Commercial Loans   358,854       359,807       358,053       366,893       385,816  
    Municipal Loans   402,041       416,986       427,225       441,168       441,512  
    Loans to Individuals   53,318       55,724       58,773       61,516       65,992  
    Total Loans $ 4,578,048     $ 4,589,365     $ 4,577,368     $ 4,524,510     $ 4,420,633  
                       
    Summary of Changes in Allowances:                  
    Allowance for Loan Losses                  
    Balance at beginning of period $ 42,407     $ 43,557     $ 42,674     $ 41,760     $ 36,303  
    Loans charged-off   (773 )     (721 )     (634 )     (1,572 )     (1,262 )
    Recoveries of loans charged-off   365       444       347       284       378  
    Net loans (charged-off) recovered   (408 )     (277 )     (287 )     (1,288 )     (884 )
    Provision for (reversal of) loan losses   2,277       (873 )     1,170       2,202       6,341  
    Balance at end of period $ 44,276     $ 42,407     $ 43,557     $ 42,674     $ 41,760  
                       
    Allowance for Off-Balance-Sheet Credit Exposures                  
    Balance at beginning of period $ 3,208     $ 2,820     $ 3,932     $ 3,853     $ 3,207  
    Provision for (reversal of) off-balance-sheet credit exposures   112       388       (1,112 )     79       646  
    Balance at end of period $ 3,320     $ 3,208     $ 2,820     $ 3,932     $ 3,853  
    Total Allowance for Credit Losses $ 47,596     $ 45,615     $ 46,377     $ 46,606     $ 45,613  
     
    Southside Bancshares, Inc.
    Consolidated Financial Highlights (Unaudited)
    (Dollars in thousands)
     
      Nine Months Ended
      September 30,
        2024       2023  
    Income Statement:      
    Total interest income $ 312,647     $ 260,802  
    Total interest expense   150,227       100,260  
    Net interest income   162,420       160,542  
    Provision for (reversal of) credit losses   1,962       6,873  
    Net interest income after provision for (reversal of) credit losses   160,458       153,669  
    Noninterest income      
    Deposit services   18,341       19,192  
    Net gain (loss) on sale of securities available for sale   (2,510 )     (5,590 )
    Net gain on sale of equity securities         5,058  
    Gain (loss) on sale of loans   (101 )     385  
    Trust fees   4,420       4,479  
    Bank owned life insurance   3,408       3,221  
    Brokerage services   3,163       2,361  
    Other   2,731       4,227  
    Total noninterest income   29,452       33,333  
    Noninterest expense      
    Salaries and employee benefits   67,330       64,473  
    Net occupancy   10,725       11,220  
    Advertising, travel & entertainment   2,479       2,966  
    ATM expense   1,105       1,033  
    Professional fees   3,435       4,036  
    Software and data processing   8,667       6,751  
    Communications   1,282       1,034  
    FDIC insurance   2,859       2,666  
    Amortization of intangibles   922       1,327  
    Other   10,174       9,889  
    Total noninterest expense   108,978       105,395  
    Income before income tax expense   80,932       81,607  
    Income tax expense   14,224       12,231  
    Net income $ 66,708     $ 69,376  
    Common Share Data:      
    Weighted-average basic shares outstanding   30,276       30,862  
    Weighted-average diluted shares outstanding   30,332       30,916  
    Common shares outstanding end of period   30,308       30,338  
    Earnings per common share      
    Basic $ 2.20     $ 2.25  
    Diluted   2.20       2.24  
    Book value per common share   26.57       24.02  
    Tangible book value per common share   19.87       17.28  
    Cash dividends paid per common share   1.08       1.05  
           
    Selected Performance Ratios:      
    Return on average assets   1.06 %     1.20 %
    Return on average shareholders’ equity   11.19       12.21  
    Return on average tangible common equity (1)   15.20       16.98  
    Average yield on earning assets (FTE) (1)   5.45       4.97  
    Average rate on interest bearing liabilities   3.27       2.49  
    Net interest margin (FTE) (1)   2.90       3.13  
    Net interest spread (FTE) (1)   2.18       2.48  
    Average earning assets to average interest bearing liabilities   128.28       134.94  
    Noninterest expense to average total assets   1.74       1.84  
    Efficiency ratio (FTE) (1)   53.35       51.44  

    (1)  Refer to the “Non-GAAP Reconciliation” at the end of the financial statement tables in this Earnings Release for a reconciliation of this non-GAAP financial measure to the nearest GAAP financial measure. 

     
    Southside Bancshares, Inc.
    Consolidated Financial Highlights (Unaudited)
    (Dollars in thousands)
     
      Nine Months Ended
      September 30,
        2024       2023  
    Nonperforming Assets: $ 7,656     $ 4,381  
    Nonaccrual loans   7,254       4,316  
    Accruing loans past due more than 90 days          
    Restructured loans         15  
    Other real estate owned   388       50  
    Repossessed assets   14        
           
    Asset Quality Ratios:      
    Ratio of nonaccruing loans to:      
    Total loans   0.16 %     0.10 %
    Ratio of nonperforming assets to:      
    Total assets   0.09       0.05  
    Total loans   0.17       0.10  
    Total loans and OREO   0.17       0.10  
    Ratio of allowance for loan losses to:      
    Nonaccruing loans   610.37       967.56  
    Nonperforming assets   578.32       953.21  
    Total loans   0.97       0.94  
    Net charge-offs (recoveries) to average loans outstanding   0.03       0.05  
           
    Capital Ratios:      
    Shareholders’ equity to total assets   9.63       9.14  
    Common equity tier 1 capital   13.07       12.27  
    Tier 1 risk-based capital   14.12       13.31  
    Total risk-based capital   16.59       15.71  
    Tier 1 leverage capital   9.61       9.61  
    Period end tangible equity to period end tangible assets (1)   7.38       6.75  
    Average shareholders’ equity to average total assets   9.51       9.81  

    (1) Refer to the “Non-GAAP Reconciliation” at the end of the financial statement tables in this Earnings Release for a reconciliation of this non-GAAP financial measure to the nearest GAAP financial measure. 

     
    Southside Bancshares, Inc.
    Consolidated Financial Highlights (Unaudited)
    (Dollars in thousands)
     
      Nine Months Ended
      September 30,
    Loan Portfolio Composition   2024       2023  
    Real Estate Loans:      
    Construction $ 585,817     $ 720,515  
    1-4 Family Residential   755,406       689,492  
    Commercial   2,422,612       2,117,306  
    Commercial Loans   358,854       385,816  
    Municipal Loans   402,041       441,512  
    Loans to Individuals   53,318       65,992  
    Total Loans $ 4,578,048     $ 4,420,633  
           
    Summary of Changes in Allowances:      
    Allowance for Loan Losses      
    Balance at beginning of period $ 42,674     $ 36,515  
    Loans charged-off   (2,128 )     (2,632 )
    Recoveries of loans charged-off   1,156       1,170  
    Net loans (charged-off) recovered   (972 )     (1,462 )
    Provision for (reversal of) loan losses   2,574       6,707  
    Balance at end of period $ 44,276     $ 41,760  
           
    Allowance for Off-Balance-Sheet Credit Exposures      
    Balance at beginning of period $ 3,932     $ 3,687  
    Provision for (reversal of) off-balance-sheet credit exposures   (612 )     166  
    Balance at end of period $ 3,320     $ 3,853  
    Total Allowance for Credit Losses $ 47,596     $ 45,613  

    The tables that follow show average earning assets and interest bearing liabilities together with the average yield on the earning assets and the average rate of the interest bearing liabilities for the periods presented. The interest and related yields presented are on a fully taxable-equivalent basis and are therefore non-GAAP measures. See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” and “Non-GAAP Reconciliation” for more information.  

    Southside Bancshares, Inc.
    Average Balances and Average Yields and Rates (Annualized) (Unaudited)
    (Dollars in thousands)
     
      Three Months Ended
      September 30, 2024   June 30, 2024
      Average Balance   Interest   Average Yield/Rate   Average Balance   Interest   Average Yield/Rate
    ASSETS                      
    Loans (1) $ 4,613,028     $ 72,493   6.25 %   $ 4,595,980     $ 70,293   6.15 %
    Loans held for sale   871       11   5.02 %     1,489       24   6.48 %
    Securities:                      
    Taxable investment securities (2)   791,914       7,150   3.59 %     783,856       7,009   3.60 %
    Tax-exempt investment securities (2)   1,174,445       11,825   4.01 %     1,254,097       12,761   4.09 %
    Mortgage-backed and related securities (2)   886,325       11,976   5.38 %     830,504       11,084   5.37 %
    Total securities   2,852,684       30,951   4.32 %     2,868,457       30,854   4.33 %
    Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost, and equity investments   41,159       582   5.63 %     40,467       573   5.69 %
    Interest earning deposits   281,313       3,798   5.37 %     300,047       4,105   5.50 %
    Federal funds sold   33,971       488   5.71 %     75,479       1,021   5.44 %
    Total earning assets   7,823,026       108,323   5.51 %     7,881,919       106,870   5.45 %
    Cash and due from banks   100,578               110,102          
    Accrued interest and other assets   455,091               424,323          
    Less: Allowance for loan losses   (42,581 )             (43,738 )        
    Total assets $ 8,336,114             $ 8,372,606          
    LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY                      
    Savings accounts $ 598,116       1,490   0.99 %   $ 604,753       1,454   0.97 %
    Certificates of deposit   1,087,613       12,647   4.63 %     1,020,099       11,630   4.59 %
    Interest bearing demand accounts   3,409,911       24,395   2.85 %     3,513,068       25,382   2.91 %
    Total interest bearing deposits   5,095,640       38,532   3.01 %     5,137,920       38,466   3.01 %
    Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings   618,708       6,488   4.17 %     606,851       6,455   4.28 %
    Subordinated notes, net of unamortized debt issuance costs   91,988       937   4.05 %     92,017       936   4.09 %
    Trust preferred subordinated debentures, net of unamortized debt issuance costs   60,273       1,180   7.79 %     60,271       1,171   7.81 %
    Repurchase agreements   83,297       899   4.29 %     88,007       955   4.36 %
    Other borrowings   137,482       2,203   6.37 %     143,169       2,595   7.29 %
    Total interest bearing liabilities   6,087,388       50,239   3.28 %     6,128,235       50,578   3.32 %
    Noninterest bearing deposits   1,344,165               1,346,274          
    Accrued expenses and other liabilities   98,331               101,399          
    Total liabilities   7,529,884               7,575,908          
    Shareholders’ equity   806,230               796,698          
    Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity $ 8,336,114             $ 8,372,606          
    Net interest income (FTE)     $ 58,084           $ 56,292    
    Net interest margin (FTE)         2.95 %           2.87 %
    Net interest spread (FTE)         2.23 %           2.13 %

    (1)  Interest on loans includes net fees on loans that are not material in amount.
    (2)  For the purpose of calculating the average yield, the average balance of securities is presented at historical cost. 

    Note: As of September 30, 2024 and June 30, 2024, loans totaling $7.3 million and $6.1 million, respectively, were on nonaccrual status. Our policy is to reverse previously accrued but unpaid interest on nonaccrual loans; thereafter, interest income is recorded to the extent received when appropriate. 

     
    Southside Bancshares, Inc.
    Average Balances and Average Yields and Rates (Annualized) (Unaudited)
    (Dollars in thousands)
     
      Three Months Ended
      March 31, 2024   December 31, 2023
      Average Balance   Interest   Average Yield/Rate   Average Balance   Interest   Average Yield/Rate
    ASSETS                      
    Loans (1) $ 4,559,602     $ 68,849   6.07 %   $ 4,473,618     $ 67,886   6.02 %
    Loans held for sale   8,834       18   0.82 %     1,858       27   5.77 %
    Securities:                      
    Taxable investment securities (2)   780,423       6,967   3.59 %     852,023       7,970   3.71 %
    Tax-exempt investment securities (2)   1,285,922       13,168   4.12 %     1,456,187       15,688   4.27 %
    Mortgage-backed and related securities (2)   764,713       10,119   5.32 %     581,548       6,865   4.68 %
    Total securities   2,831,058       30,254   4.30 %     2,889,758       30,523   4.19 %
    Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost, and equity investments   40,063       333   3.34 %     24,674       296   4.76 %
    Interest earning deposits   380,181       5,202   5.50 %     150,763       2,054   5.41 %
    Federal funds sold   62,599       838   5.38 %     93,149       1,286   5.48 %
    Total earning assets   7,882,337       105,494   5.38 %     7,633,820       102,072   5.30 %
    Cash and due from banks   114,379               110,380          
    Accrued interest and other assets   441,783               374,120          
    Less: Allowance for loan losses   (42,973 )             (41,822 )        
    Total assets $ 8,395,526             $ 8,076,498          
    LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY                      
    Savings accounts $ 604,529       1,424   0.95 %   $ 610,453       1,432   0.93 %
    Certificates of deposit   941,947       10,341   4.42 %     910,759       9,691   4.22 %
    Interest bearing demand accounts   3,634,936       26,433   2.92 %     3,469,120       24,498   2.80 %
    Total interest bearing deposits   5,181,412       38,198   2.97 %     4,990,332       35,621   2.83 %
    Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings   607,033       5,950   3.94 %     262,709       1,430   2.16 %
    Subordinated notes, net of unamortized debt issuance costs   93,895       956   4.10 %     93,859       965   4.08 %
    Trust preferred subordinated debentures, net of unamortized debt issuance costs   60,270       1,175   7.84 %     60,269       1,195   7.87 %
    Repurchase agreements   92,177       967   4.22 %     96,622       1,008   4.14 %
    Other borrowings   137,287       2,164   6.34 %     294,683       4,235   5.70 %
    Total interest bearing liabilities   6,172,074       49,410   3.22 %     5,798,474       44,454   3.04 %
    Noninterest bearing deposits   1,338,384               1,424,961          
    Accrued expenses and other liabilities   100,014               115,388          
    Total liabilities   7,610,472               7,338,823          
    Shareholders’ equity   785,054               737,675          
    Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity $ 8,395,526             $ 8,076,498          
    Net interest income (FTE)     $ 56,084           $ 57,618    
    Net interest margin (FTE)         2.86 %           2.99 %
    Net interest spread (FTE)         2.16 %           2.26 %

    (1)   Interest on loans includes net fees on loans that are not material in amount.
    (2)   For the purpose of calculating the average yield, the average balance of securities is presented at historical cost. 

    Note: As of March 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, loans totaling $7.7 million and $3.9 million, respectively, were on nonaccrual status. Our policy is to reverse previously accrued but unpaid interest on nonaccrual loans; thereafter, interest income is recorded to the extent received when appropriate. 

     
    Southside Bancshares, Inc.
    Average Balances and Average Yields and Rates (Annualized) (Unaudited)
    (Dollars in thousands)
     
      Three Months Ended
      September 30, 2023
      Average Balance   Interest   Average Yield/Rate
    ASSETS          
    Loans (1) $ 4,396,184     $ 64,758   5.84 %
    Loans held for sale   1,537       26   6.71 %
    Securities:          
    Taxable investment securities (2)   912,789       8,731   3.79 %
    Tax-exempt investment securities (2)   1,510,044       16,232   4.26 %
    Mortgage-backed and related securities (2)   442,908       4,426   3.96 %
    Total securities   2,865,741       29,389   4.07 %
    Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost, and equity investments   22,363       265   4.70 %
    Interest earning deposits   37,891       535   5.60 %
    Federal funds sold   94,441       1,253   5.26 %
    Total earning assets   7,418,157       96,226   5.15 %
    Cash and due from banks   106,348          
    Accrued interest and other assets   400,850          
    Less: Allowance for loan losses   (36,493 )        
    Total assets $ 7,888,862          
    LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY          
    Savings accounts $ 622,246       1,458   0.93 %
    Certificates of deposit   949,894       9,443   3.94 %
    Interest bearing demand accounts   3,189,048       20,050   2.49 %
    Total interest bearing deposits   4,761,188       30,951   2.58 %
    Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings   230,184       1,174   2.02 %
    Subordinated notes, net of unamortized debt issuance costs   93,817       962   4.07 %
    Trust preferred subordinated debentures, net of unamortized debt issuance costs   60,268       1,178   7.75 %
    Repurchase agreements   104,070       1,048   4.00 %
    Other borrowings   317,913       4,492   5.61 %
    Total interest bearing liabilities   5,567,440       39,805   2.84 %
    Noninterest bearing deposits   1,441,738          
    Accrued expenses and other liabilities   109,490          
    Total liabilities   7,118,668          
    Shareholders’ equity   770,194          
    Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity $ 7,888,862          
    Net interest income (FTE)     $ 56,421    
    Net interest margin (FTE)         3.02 %
    Net interest spread (FTE)         2.31 %

    (1)   Interest on loans includes net fees on loans that are not material in amount.
    (2)   For the purpose of calculating the average yield, the average balance of securities is presented at historical cost. 

    Note: As of September 30, 2023, loans totaling $4.3 million were on nonaccrual status. Our policy is to reverse previously accrued but unpaid interest on nonaccrual loans; thereafter, interest income is recorded to the extent received when appropriate. 

     
    Southside Bancshares, Inc.
    Average Balances and Average Yields and Rates (Annualized) (Unaudited)
    (Dollars in thousands)
     
      Nine Months Ended
      September 30, 2024   September 30, 2023
      Average Balance   Interest   Average Yield/Rate   Average Balance   Interest   Average Yield/Rate
    ASSETS                      
    Loans (1) $ 4,589,621     $ 211,635   6.16 %   $ 4,241,676     $ 179,545   5.66 %
    Loans held for sale   3,721       53   1.90 %     1,620       69   5.69 %
    Securities:                      
    Taxable investment securities (2)   785,422       21,126   3.59 %     843,846       23,216   3.68 %
    Tax-exempt investment securities (2)   1,237,884       37,754   4.07 %     1,587,656       48,880   4.12 %
    Mortgage-backed and related securities (2)   827,396       33,179   5.36 %     433,335       12,585   3.88 %
    Total securities   2,850,702       92,059   4.31 %     2,864,837       84,681   3.95 %
    Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost, and equity investments   40,565       1,488   4.90 %     25,071       889   4.74 %
    Interest earning deposits   320,371       13,105   5.46 %     60,623       2,310   5.09 %
    Federal funds sold   57,265       2,347   5.47 %     75,499       2,838   5.03 %
    Total earning assets   7,862,245       320,687   5.45 %     7,269,326       270,332   4.97 %
    Cash and due from banks   108,325               105,885          
    Accrued interest and other assets   440,340               406,160          
    Less: Allowance for loan losses   (43,096 )             (36,564 )        
    Total assets $ 8,367,814             $ 7,744,807          
    LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY                      
    Savings accounts $ 602,450       4,368   0.97 %   $ 645,415       4,201   0.87 %
    Certificates of deposit   1,016,812       34,618   4.55 %     845,851       21,215   3.35 %
    Interest bearing demand accounts   3,518,906       76,210   2.89 %     3,005,449       47,120   2.10 %
    Total interest bearing deposits   5,138,168       115,196   2.99 %     4,496,715       72,536   2.16 %
    Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings   610,893       18,893   4.13 %     281,260       5,347   2.54 %
    Subordinated notes, net of unamortized debt issuance costs   92,631       2,829   4.08 %     96,753       2,955   4.08 %
    Trust preferred subordinated debentures, net of unamortized debt issuance costs   60,271       3,526   7.81 %     60,266       3,309   7.34 %
    Repurchase agreements   87,811       2,821   4.29 %     89,282       2,423   3.63 %
    Other borrowings   139,306       6,962   6.68 %     362,684       13,690   5.05 %
    Total interest bearing liabilities   6,129,080       150,227   3.27 %     5,386,960       100,260   2.49 %
    Noninterest bearing deposits   1,342,945               1,506,431          
    Accrued expenses and other liabilities   99,758               91,784          
    Total liabilities   7,571,783               6,985,175          
    Shareholders’ equity   796,031               759,632          
    Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity $ 8,367,814             $ 7,744,807          
    Net interest income (FTE)     $ 170,460           $ 170,072    
    Net interest margin (FTE)         2.90 %           3.13 %
    Net interest spread (FTE)         2.18 %           2.48 %

    (1)   Interest on loans includes net fees on loans that are not material in amount.
    (2)   For the purpose of calculating the average yield, the average balance of securities is presented at historical cost. 

    Note: As of September 30, 2024 and 2023, loans totaling $7.3 million and $4.3 million, respectively, were on nonaccrual status. Our policy is to reverse previously accrued but unpaid interest on nonaccrual loans; thereafter, interest income is recorded to the extent received when appropriate. 

    The following tables set forth the reconciliation of return on average common equity to return on average tangible common equity, book value per share to tangible book value per share, net interest income to net interest income adjusted to a fully taxable-equivalent basis assuming a 21% marginal tax rate for interest earned on tax-exempt assets such as municipal loans and investment securities, along with the calculation of total revenue, adjusted noninterest expense, efficiency ratio (FTE), net interest margin (FTE) and net interest spread (FTE) for the applicable periods presented. 

     
    Southside Bancshares, Inc.
    Non-GAAP Reconciliation (Unaudited)
    (Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)
     
        Three Months Ended   Nine Months Ended
          2024       2023       2024       2023  
        Sep 30,   Jun 30,   Mar 31,   Dec 31,   Sep 30,   Sep 30,   Sep 30,
    Reconciliation of return on average common equity to return on average tangible common equity:                            
    Net income   $ 20,524     $ 24,673     $ 21,511     $ 17,316     $ 18,449     $ 66,708     $ 69,376  
    After-tax amortization expense     220       243       266       292       322       728       1,048  
    Adjusted net income available to common shareholders   $ 20,744     $ 24,916     $ 21,777     $ 17,608     $ 18,771     $ 67,436     $ 70,424  
                                 
    Average shareholders’ equity   $ 806,230     $ 796,698     $ 785,054     $ 737,675     $ 770,194     $ 796,031     $ 759,632  
    Less: Average intangibles for the period     (203,288 )     (203,581 )     (203,910 )     (204,267 )     (204,658 )     (203,592 )     (205,096 )
    Average tangible shareholders’ equity   $ 602,942     $ 593,117     $ 581,144     $ 533,408     $ 565,536     $ 592,439     $ 554,536  
                                 
    Return on average tangible common equity     13.69 %     16.90 %     15.07 %     13.10 %     13.17 %     15.20 %     16.98 %
                                 
    Reconciliation of book value per share to tangible book value per share:                            
    Common equity at end of period   $ 805,254     $ 800,970     $ 787,922     $ 773,288     $ 728,595     $ 805,254     $ 728,595  
    Less: Intangible assets at end of period     (203,119 )     (203,397 )     (203,704 )     (204,041 )     (204,411 )     (203,119 )     (204,411 )
    Tangible common shareholders’ equity at end of period   $ 602,135     $ 597,573     $ 584,218     $ 569,247     $ 524,184     $ 602,135     $ 524,184  
                                 
    Total assets at end of period   $ 8,362,263     $ 8,357,702     $ 8,353,863     $ 8,284,914     $ 7,972,468     $ 8,362,263     $ 7,972,468  
    Less: Intangible assets at end of period     (203,119 )     (203,397 )     (203,704 )     (204,041 )     (204,411 )     (203,119 )     (204,411 )
    Tangible assets at end of period   $ 8,159,144     $ 8,154,305     $ 8,150,159     $ 8,080,873     $ 7,768,057     $ 8,159,144     $ 7,768,057  
                                 
    Period end tangible equity to period end tangible assets     7.38 %     7.33 %     7.17 %     7.04 %     6.75 %     7.38 %     6.75 %
                                 
    Common shares outstanding end of period     30,308       30,261       30,284       30,249       30,338       30,308       30,338  
    Tangible book value per common share   $ 19.87     $ 19.75     $ 19.29     $ 18.82     $ 17.28     $ 19.87     $ 17.28  
                                 
    Reconciliation of efficiency ratio to efficiency ratio (FTE), net interest margin to net interest margin (FTE) and net interest spread to net interest spread (FTE):                            
    Net interest income (GAAP)   $ 55,464     $ 53,608     $ 53,348     $ 54,485     $ 53,273     $ 162,420     $ 160,542  
    Tax-equivalent adjustments:                            
    Loans     608       633       656       680       674       1,897       2,044  
    Tax-exempt investment securities     2,012       2,051       2,080       2,453       2,474       6,143       7,486  
    Net interest income (FTE) (1)     58,084       56,292       56,084       57,618       56,421       170,460       170,072  
    Noninterest income     8,171       11,557       9,724       2,501       10,836       29,452       33,333  
    Nonrecurring income (2)     2,797       (576 )     18       8,376       (11 )     2,239       (1,006 )
    Total revenue   $ 69,052     $ 67,273     $ 65,826     $ 68,495     $ 67,246     $ 202,151     $ 202,399  
                                                             
    Noninterest expense   $ 36,332     $ 35,765     $ 36,881     $ 35,183     $ 35,553     $ 108,978     $ 105,395  
    Pre-tax amortization expense     (278 )     (307 )     (337 )     (370 )     (407 )     (922 )     (1,327 )
    Nonrecurring expense (3)     (219 )     2       17       22       17       (200 )     56  
    Adjusted noninterest expense   $ 35,835     $ 35,460     $ 36,561     $ 34,835     $ 35,163     $ 107,856     $ 104,124  
                                                             
    Efficiency ratio     53.94 %     54.90 %     57.95 %     53.30 %     54.86 %     55.56 %     53.99 %
    Efficiency ratio (FTE) (1)     51.90 %     52.71 %     55.54 %     50.86 %     52.29 %     53.35 %     51.44 %
                                                             
    Average earning assets   $ 7,823,026     $ 7,881,919     $ 7,882,337     $ 7,633,820     $ 7,418,157     $ 7,862,245     $ 7,269,326  
                                                             
    Net interest margin     2.82 %     2.74 %     2.72 %     2.83 %     2.85 %     2.76 %     2.95 %
    Net interest margin (FTE) (1)     2.95 %     2.87 %     2.86 %     2.99 %     3.02 %     2.90 %     3.13 %
                                                             
    Net interest spread     2.10 %     2.00 %     2.02 %     2.10 %     2.14 %     2.04 %     2.31 %
    Net interest spread (FTE) (1)     2.23 %     2.13 %     2.16 %     2.26 %     2.31 %     2.18 %     2.48 %

    (1)   These amounts are presented on a fully taxable-equivalent basis and are non-GAAP measures.
    (2)   These adjustments may include net gain or loss on sale of securities available for sale, net gain on sale of equity securities, BOLI income related to death benefits realized and other investment income or loss in the periods where applicable.
    (3)   These adjustments may include foreclosure expenses and branch closure expenses, in the periods where applicable.

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI USA: Attorney General James Announces Convictions of Orange County Transportation Company Owners for Stealing More Than $2.1 Million from Medicaid

    Source: US State of New York

    NEW YORK – New York Attorney General Letitia James today announced that the owners of DYD Universe, Inc. (DYD), a New York Medicaid-enrolled transportation company, have pleaded guilty for their roles in a scheme that stole more than $2.1 million from Medicaid and paid illegal kickbacks to Medicaid recipients. Damir Yuldashev, 64, his son Daler Yuldashev, 38, and Daler’s mother Nigina Iskandarova, 60, all of Monroe, New York, admitted that from April 2018 to March 2023, they stole more than $2.1 million from Medicaid by submitting fraudulent claims for services that they knowingly did not provide and toll charges that they knew were not incurred. The owners also admitted to paying illegal kickbacks to Medicaid recipients in exchange for providing DYD with their confidential Medicaid identification in order to carry out the scheme. As a result of the pleas, Damir Yuldashev will be sentenced to two to six years in prison and, along with Daler Yuldashev, must pay back over $2.1 million to Medicaid. Daler Yuldashev and Nigina Iskandarova will be sentenced to probation, and all three defendants will be permanently banned from being providers in all government-funded health programs. 

    “Stealing taxpayer funds that are meant to provide health care for low-income New Yorkers is unacceptable,” said Attorney General James. “Instead of providing vulnerable patients with the transportation services they needed to get them to their appointments, these individuals exploited Medicaid recipients to carry out their fraud. I will not tolerate schemes like these that damage our health care system, and my office will continue to go after fraudsters who steal from Medicaid.”  

    Medicaid recipients who lack access to transportation can use approved transportation providers to travel to and from covered medical services. These providers receive reimbursements from Medicaid for the rides they provide. From April 2018 to March 2023, Daler and Damir Yuldashev billed Medicaid for fictitious trips and added fake tolls to their trips to inflate their costs. DYD’s claims often added toll charges from $15 to as much as $50 when the trip did not actually incur any tolls at all. As a result of their scheme, DYD illegally overcharged Medicaid more than $2.1 million.

    To carry out their scheme, the defendants paid Medicaid recipients to sign up with DYD and use fake addresses or drive themselves to their appointments, allowing DYD to either inflate or submit entirely false claims for transportation to Medicaid. These payments were illegal and undermined the businesses of other transportation providers in the Hudson Valley. Some passengers were paid thousands of dollars each to take rides that allowed DYD to collect tens of thousands of dollars in fees per passenger.

    All three defendants pleaded guilty in Orange County Court in front of Judge Richard Guertin. Damir Yuldashev pleaded guilty to Grand Larceny in the First Degree, a class B felony. Daler Yuldashev pleaded guilty to Grand Larceny in the Third Degree, a class D felony. Nigina Iskandarova pleaded guilty to violating New York’s anti-kickback statute, Social Services Law section 366-d, a class E felony. DYD also pleaded guilty to Grand Larceny in the First Degree.

    Damir Yuldashev faces a sentence of two to six years in state prison. Daler Yuldashev and Nigina Iskandarova, both of whom played lesser roles in the scheme, will be sentenced to probation, with Daler Yuldashev required to perform at least 1,200 hours of community service. As part of their sentence, Damir and Daler Yuldashev must pay $2,127,624 to Medicaid in restitution for their crimes. If they fail to pay restitution as ordered by the Court at sentencing, Damir and Daler Yuldashev will be required to serve additional time in state prison. As a result of their convictions, each defendant is also permanently excluded from being a provider in all government-funded health programs, including Medicaid and Medicare.

    The Office of the Attorney General thanks the New York State Department of Health and the Office of the Medicaid Inspector General for their assistance in this investigation.

    This matter was investigated by Detectives Peter Olsen and Frank Bluszcz with assistance from Supervising Detective Jeffrey Pitts. The financial analysis was conducted by Principal Auditor-Investigators John Annunziata, Lora Pomponio, and Melissa Stoebling, and Senior Auditor-Investigator Christopher Giacoia. Legal Support Analyst Kelvin Caraballo provided paralegal assistance.

    The case was handled by Special Assistant Attorneys General Eva Urrutia and Robert Trudell, and the MFCU Pearl River Regional Office Regional Director Todd Pettigrew, with assistance from MFCU Chief of Criminal Investigations Thomas O’Hanlon and Deputy Chief of MFCU’s Civil Enforcement Division Konrad Payne.  Alee Scott is MFCU’s Chief of the Civil Enforcement Division. MFCU is led by Director Amy Held and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Paul J. Mahoney. The Division of Criminal Justice is led by Chief Deputy Attorney General José Maldonado under the oversight of First Deputy Attorney General Jennifer Levy.

    Reporting Medicaid Provider Fraud: MFCU defends the public by addressing Medicaid provider fraud and protecting nursing home residents from abuse and neglect. If an individual believes they have information about Medicaid provider fraud or about an incident of abuse or neglect of a nursing home resident, they can file a confidential complaint online or call the MFCU hotline at (800) 771-7755. If the situation is an emergency, please call 911.

    New York MFCU’s total funding for federal fiscal year (FY) 2025 is $70,502,916. Of that total, 75 percent, or $52,877,188, is awarded under a grant from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The remaining 25 percent, totaling $17,625,728 for FY 2025, is funded by New York State.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Security: Kingston — UPDATE: Southwest Nova RCMP Major Crime Unit now leading investigation into fatal shooting in Kingston

    Source: Royal Canadian Mounted Police

    The Southwest Nova RCMP Major Crime Unit has taken over an investigation into a shooting in Kingston, where a man has since died.

    On March 6, 2023, at approximately 10:15 p.m., Kings District RCMP responded to multiple reports of shots fired in the Pleasant St. area in Kingston. RCMP officers located a 30-year-old man laying in a driveway on Pleasant St. He had suffered gunshot wounds and was transported to hospital by ambulance with life-threatening injuries. Four people were arrested later in the evening; however, all were later released without charge, pending further investigation.

    On September 30, 2024, the victim passed away in hospital and on October 1, the Nova Scotia Medical Examiners Office ruled the death a homicide. The investigation was subsequently taken over by the Southwest Nova Major Crime Unit.

    Over the last 20 months, the investigation was led by the Kings District RCMP General Investigation Section. Numerous search warrants were executed, evidence has been seized and witnesses have been interviewed. Persons of interest have been identified and investigators believe that the victim was targeted.

    The Southwest Nova RCMP Major Crime Unit is being supported by the Nova Scotia Medical Examiner’s Office, RCMP Forensic Identification Services, RCMP Digital Forensic Services and the Kings District RCMP General Investigation Section. Anyone with information is asked to call 902-365-3120. Should you wish to remain anonymous, contact Nova Scotia Crime Stoppers toll-free at 1-800-222-TIPS (8477), submit a secure web tip at www.crimestoppers.ns.ca, or use the P3 Tips App.

    News release from March 7, 2023: Kings District RCMP arrest four people in shooting

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI: Usio to Host Third Quarter Fiscal 2024 Conference Call to Discuss Results and Provide Company Update on November 6, 2024

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    SAN ANTONIO, Oct. 23, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Usio, Inc. (Nasdaq:USIO), a leading FinTech that operates a full stack of integrated, cloud-based electronic payment and embedded financial solutions, today announced it will release third quarter fiscal 2024 financial results for the period ended September 30, 2024, after the market closes on Wednesday, November 6, 2024.

    Usio’s management will host a conference call the same day, November 6, 2024, beginning at 4:30 p.m. Eastern time to review financial results and provide a business update. Following management’s formal remarks, there will be a question-and-answer session.

    To listen to the conference call, interested parties within the U.S. should call 1-844-883-3890. International callers should call 1-412-317-9246. All callers should ask for the Usio conference call. The conference call will also be available through a live webcast, which can be accessed via the company’s website at https://usio.com/events-2/.

    A replay of the call will be available approximately one hour after the end of the call through November 20, 2024. The replay can be accessed via the Company’s website or by dialing 1-877-344-7529 (U.S.) or 1-412-317-0088 (international). The replay conference playback code is: 7062327.

    About Usio, Inc.

    Usio, Inc. (Nasdaq: USIO), a leading, cloud-based, integrated FinTech electronic payment solutions provider, offers a wide range of payment solutions to merchants, billers, banks, service bureaus, integrated software vendors and card issuers. The Company operates credit, debit/prepaid, and ACH payment processing platforms to deliver convenient, world-class payment solutions and services clients through its unique payment facilitation platform as a service. The company, through its Usio Output Solutions division offers services relating to electronic bill presentment, document composition, document decomposition and printing and mailing services. The strength of the Company lies in its ability to provide tailored solutions for card issuance, payment acceptance, and bill payments as well as its unique technology in the card issuing sector. Usio is headquartered in San Antonio, Texas, and has offices in Austin, Texas.

    Websites: www.usio.comwww.payfacinabox.comwww.akimbocard.com and www.usiooutput.com. Find us on Facebook® and Twitter.

    FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS DISCLAIMER
    Except for the historical information contained herein, the matters discussed in this release include forward-looking statements which are covered by safe harbors. Those statements include, but may not be limited to, all statements regarding management’s intent, belief, and expectations, such as statements concerning our future and our operating and growth strategy. These forward-looking statements are identified by the use of words such as “believe,” “intend,” “look forward,” “anticipate,” “schedule,” and “expect” among others. Forward-looking statements in this press release are subject to certain risks and uncertainties inherent in the Company’s business that could cause actual results to vary, including such risks related to an economic downturn as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, the realization of opportunities from the IMS acquisition, the management of the Company’s growth, the loss of key resellers, the relationships with the Automated Clearinghouse network, bank sponsors, third-party card processing providers and merchants, the security of our software, hardware and information, the volatility of the stock price, the need to obtain additional financing, risks associated with new tax legislation, and compliance with complex federal, state and local laws and regulations, and other risks detailed from time to time in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission including its annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023. One or more of these factors have affected, and in the future, could affect the Company’s businesses and financial results in the future and could cause actual results to differ materially from plans and projections. The Company believes that the assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements included in this release will prove to be accurate. In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the forward-looking statements included herein, the inclusion of such information should not be regarded as a representation by us or any other person that the objectives and plans will be achieved. All forward-looking statements made in this release are based on information presently available to management. The Company assumes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements, except as required by law.

    Contact

    Paul Manley
    Senior Vice President, Investor Relations
    paul.manley@usio.com
    612-834-1804

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI: Sarmayacar latest initiative Climaventures Fund Secures $15 Million Anchor Commitment from Green Climate Fund to Accelerate Climate-Tech Innovation in Pakistan

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Lahore, Pakistan, Oct. 23, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Venture capital firm Sarmayacar is today announcing it has successfully secured $15m for its new Climaventures Fund from the Green Climate Fund (GCF), marking a significant milestone in the growth of Pakistan’s climate-tech ecosystem. This GCF funding will play an anchoring role in the new fund that Sarmayacar is targeting to have a hard cap of $40 million. An additional $10 million has been allocated to an affiliated venture accelerator program run by the National Rural Support Programme (NRSP) to support even earlier-stage climate-tech startups with a similar thesis. The final approval from the GCF Board, following its meeting in Songdo, South Korea, highlights the growing global interest in addressing Pakistan’s critical climate challenges with scalable, impactful solutions.

    With this capital, the Sarmayacar Climaventures Fund will focus on empowering local startups in critical sectors such as renewable energy, electric mobility and sustainable agriculture. These ventures will receive both financial backing and strategic guidance to help accelerate their growth and environmental impact. By strengthening Pakistan’s climate-tech landscape, Sarmayacar aims to position the country as a key player in regional sustainability efforts while attracting international investment into climate-focused ventures.

    Sarmayacar CEO and founder Rabeel Warraich with General Partner Bernhard Klemen

    Sarmayacar, founded in 2018 as Pakistan’s first institutional venture capital firm, has been instrumental in advancing the country’s startup ecosystem. Its initial $25 million tech-focused fund, anchored by the International Finance Corporation (IFC), catalysed over $800 million in venture capital investments into Pakistani startups, and supported high-growth ventures across sectors such as fintech, e-commerce, healthtech, and logistics. Led by CEO and Founder, Rabeel Warraich and General Partner, Dr. Bernhard Klemen, the firm is now leveraging its experience and market-knowledge to address Pakistan’s climate challenges through its Climaventures Fund. 

    “Addressing Pakistan’s climate emergency requires an approach that fosters entrepreneurial innovation,” said Rabeel Warraich, CEO and Founder of Sarmayacar. “Our new climate fund – a first for Pakistan – will back founders building localised, scalable climate solutions for the country. We hope to spawn an entire climate venture ecosystem by leveraging our experience and connectivity in the country and beyond.”

    Sarmayacar’s latest initiative taps into the global momentum behind climate-tech investment. According to the Climate Policy Initiative’s Global Landscape of Climate Finance 2023 report, global climate finance averaged $1.27 trillion annually in 2021-2022, nearly doubling from previous years. This surge underscores the urgent need to scale climate solutions globally. In Pakistan, where climate challenges are particularly acute, the Sarmayacar Climaventures Fund aims to back startups that contribute to the country’s broader environmental goals, driving both impact and sustainable growth. Despite contributing only 0.9% to global greenhouse gas emissions, Pakistan ranks as the 8th most vulnerable country to climate change, according to the Global Climate Risk Index. 

    Dr. Bernhard Klemen, General Partner at Sarmayacar added, “Since launching Pakistan’s first VC fund in 2018, Sarmayacar has built a track record of identifying and supporting market-transforming startups in the country. With this new climate-themed fund, we plan to replicate the playbook of our first fund and invest in commercially attractive opportunities that can also create significant impact. There is already an actionable pipeline which we hope to capitalise on with the support of reputable and like-minded partners like the GCF.”

    The Green Climate Fund’s endorsement underscores the critical role that venture capital must play in addressing climate change, particularly in emerging markets. The fund will also help mobilise additional private capital, de-risking early-stage climate ventures and attracting further investment from global institutions.

    Looking ahead, Sarmayacar aims to position Pakistan as a leader in climate-tech innovation, driving scalable solutions to tackle pressing climate challenges. With the Sarmayacar Climaventures Fund, the firm is committed to supporting the next generation of climate-tech entrepreneurs, ensuring they have the resources and expertise to succeed both locally and globally. By continuing to attract capital and fostering impactful ventures, Sarmayacar is helping to shape a more sustainable future for Pakistan and beyond. 

    Ends 

    Notes to the editor
    Media images can be found here

    About Sarmayacar
    Sarmayacar is Pakistan’s first institutional venture capital firm, backing early-stage tech startups across a variety of sectors. Since its inception, Sarmayacar has supported high-growth ventures with a focus on driving innovation and sustainable growth in Pakistan’s startup ecosystem. 
    For more information, please visit www.sarmayacar.com 

    About GCF
    The Green Climate Fund is a global initiative established under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) to help developing countries reduce their greenhouse gas emissions and adapt to the impacts of climate change. GCF invests in low-emission, climate-resilient projects across various sectors, mobilising public and private sector resources to support climate action. For more information, please visit www.greenclimate.fund

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI Security: Red Deer — Red Deer RCMP and Calgary Police Service joint investigation leads to arrest

    Source: Royal Canadian Mounted Police

    Between the period of November 2022 and February 2023, Red Deer RCMP General Investigations Section (GIS) received multiple reports of indecent phone calls being made to real estate agents and others in similar occupations. These calls were made by an unknown male who made threatening and sexual comments. At the same time, the Calgary Police Service Cyber/Forensics Unit began investigating similar offences reported within the city of Calgary.

    As a result of a joint investigation with Calgary Police Service, Red Deer RCMP GIS have charged one individual in connection to these phone calls.

    A 29-year-old resident of Edmonton, has been charged with the following offences:

    • Harassing communications x 22
    • Indecent communications
    • Uttering threats x 12

    The individual was served a summons and is schedule to appear on Oct. 29, 2024, at the Alberta Court of Justice in Red Deer.

    “This arrest underscores our unwavering commitment to the safety and well-being of our communities. No one should have to endure threats, harassment or malicious phone calls while carrying out their work. This kind of behaviour is unacceptable, and we will continue to take action to ensure that everyone can perform their duties in a safe and secure environment.” said Cst. Amanda Burke of Red Deer RCMP GIS.

    “In cybercrime investigations, we commonly see individuals using technology to victimize individuals from multiple different jurisdictions. Working with other law enforcement agencies is key in addressing these crimes, and in this case, investigators were able to work together with the RCMP to collect important digital evidence, which ultimately led to these charges.” said Sgt. Ryan Nolan of the Calgary Police Service Cybercrime Team.

    If you have information regarding illegal activity within the city of Red Deer please contact Red Deer RCMP at 403-406-2200. If you wish to remain anonymous, you can contact Crime Stoppers at 1-800-222-8477 (TIPS), online at www.P3Tips.com or by using the “P3 Tips” app available through the Apple App or Google Play Store. To report crime online, or for access to RCMP news and information, download the Alberta RCMP app through Apple or Google Play.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI: Surfshark introduces a free data leak-checking tool during Cybersecurity Awareness Month

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Surfshark is launching a new, free online Data Leak Checker, offering users an easy way to monitor the safety of their personal information in recognition of Cybersecurity Awareness Month this October. Powered by Surfshark Alert, this tool allows users to check if their personal data has been compromised in a data leak by simply entering their email address. It is designed to ensure that the entered email is not used for any marketing purposes.

    The new Data Leak Checker features comprehensive scanning capabilities, allowing users to enter their email addresses to examine multiple sources for potential database and malware-related leaks. This tool continuously monitors the web to proactively ensure the security of users’ personal information across various platforms and detects instances where their data might have been compromised. 

    Upon completion of the scan, users receive a report divided into two key areas: database breaches and malware attacks. The database breaches section identifies large breached domains and compromised databases that may have included the user’s information. Meanwhile, the malware attacks section highlights potential vulnerabilities of the user’s email address due to malware activities on their device. 

    The database breach report shows the largest breached domains and compromised databases that user information was part of. For security reasons, some data may be hidden. However, complete and detailed information about the leak will be visible in Surfshark Alert.

    “Globally, approximately 18 billion user accounts have been leaked over the last 20 years, according to Surfshark’s Global Data Breach Statistics. As we launch the Data Leak Checker, we stress the importance of knowing exactly where and how your data may have been compromised. Understanding breach details can empower individuals to take informed actions to protect their personal information and prevent further damage. This tool is simple and accessible for everyone, regardless of their level of technical expertise,” said Kornelija Vanage, Alert Product Owner at Surfshark. 

    If users discover that their data has been leaked online, it’s crucial to act quickly to mitigate potential damage. First, they should change the passwords for all affected accounts, ensuring each new password is strong and unique. They might consider using a password manager to help generate and store passwords securely. Additionally, enabling two-factor authentication (2FA) on all accounts that offer it can add an extra layer of security.

    Users should then monitor their accounts for suspicious activity, such as unauthorized transactions or login attempts, and report any anomalies to the respective service providers. It’s important for users to be vigilant about phishing attempts, as attackers may use leaked information to craft convincing scams. Investing in tools that monitor data safety is also advised.

    NOTES TO EDITORS Surfshark is a cybersecurity company focused on developing humanized privacy and security solutions. The Surfshark One suite includes one of the very few VPNs audited by independent security experts, an officially certified antivirus, a private search tool, and a data leak alert system. Surfshark ranks 47th in the Financial Times 1000: Europe’s Fastest Growing Companies list and is recognized as the Tech Advisor’s Editor’s Choice for 2024. For a closer look at Surfshark in 2023, visit our annual wrap-up.

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI Economics: Change happens – and why central banks care

    Source: Bank for International Settlements

    It is a great pleasure for me to join you today. Many thanks to the staff at the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia for the invitation. 1

    BIS Innovation Hub

    Today I want to talk about change and central banks. But before I begin, allow me to briefly introduce the BIS Innovation Hub. The Bank for International Settlements supports central banks in their pursuit of monetary and financial stability by fostering international cooperation. The Innovation Hub was created five years ago and can be described as a joint venture between the BIS and the central banks who host our seven centres. The Innovation Hub has almost 100 people working together across the world. Our mandate is to follow and explore new technology and, when suitable, develop public goods. And to do that we research technologies and challenges that matter to central banks by building proofs of concept or prototypes. In more than 30 projects to date, we have collaborated with central banks and other partners to demonstrate the art of the possible. Currently, tokenisation and artificial intelligence are important areas for us, where we have multiple projects under way. Another crucial area is ensuring the integrity and safety in the financial system by exploring possible improvements to services like payments. Again, we aim to demonstrate the art of the possible. Adopting some of the technologies or implementing the outcomes of our projects is not up to us. Ultimately, countries’ authorities decide what becomes reality in their jurisdictions.

    So why am I here? Well, when I was asked to join you here at the Philadelphia Fed, I immediately said yes. Maybe too fast, because the organisers kept asking me what I wanted to announce. I had to disappoint them. This is not a public service announcement. I am not trying to sell you anything. What I want to do in the next 10 minutes is explain why central banks care about change and innovation – and why that matters to us all.  

    Technology and change

    Let me start with innovation and change, for which I will look to Adam Smith. Who better? The Wealth of Nations was published about 250 years ago. And Adam Smith uses the example of moving goods by road or by ship. Canal companies were the big techs of the day. They could move things faster and cheaper, and only the most niche products chose the horse and cart. Yet 100 years later, the transport network and – by extension the industrial capacity of Britain – was totally unrecognisable.

    What changed? In that time, railways happened. Or more accurately, innovation changed how railways were used. There were railways when Adam Smith was writing. But they were small, private and horse-drawn. He did not even mention them as a contender to roads and ships. But 50 years of innovation in steam engines – to make them smaller, faster and more efficient – would make railways far superior to canals. Following some smaller private railways, the first public railway – from Liverpool to Manchester – opened in 1830. At that time, there were about 125 miles of railways in England. Over the next 40 years, this grew to 13,000 miles. Canals were dead in the water.

    Was the change smooth, clearly predictable and always rational and obvious? No. Was it just the technology advantages that catalysed the change? No. It was many things. Financial innovations meant that investments in railways were easier. Yet this also created a financial bubble. Early safety regulations reassured a sceptical public – but not before some terrible accidents. Competition drove further innovation but resulted in a grossly inefficient network. When agreement on a standardised width of railway gauge was eventually brokered, network effects could be enhanced. The standard adopted was George Stephenson’s 4 feet, 8 1⁄2 inches, which spread across England and internationally. I have been told the United States uses it too.

    But why am I telling you a story about something that happened in England hundreds of years ago? Well first, I enjoy history. But second, because it is a great example of how technologies change. Do you see any parallels with today? Railways did not just “win” overnight. They were initially less efficient than canals. Canal owners saw the threat and organised resistance. Yet railways improved faster than canals could – at least once steam engines became technologically and commercially viable. Investment played a significant role in this. So, at times, did safety regulations and politics. There were battles about which standards should be used. And importantly, change driven by technology and innovation is not an elegant dance. It is a race and a tussle and sometimes a mess.

    To really make the point, allow me one more historical example closer to home. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York recently published an article about when securities markets scrapped paper in the 1960s and ’70s. At that time, IBM and Honeywell were in a race to develop more powerful computers. And stockbrokers were racing one another to use them for competitive advantage. The winners of that race went on to dominate securities markets for decades because they bought out the failing houses that could not operate their computers as effectively. And the digital infrastructures they created, based on the paper processes before them, are the ones we use now. And they are the same infrastructures now experimenting with tokenisation and are maybe on the cusp of another change.

    Understanding change

    How do industries and society manage these huge changes? Almost all industries have regulations of various kinds to ensure safety, competition and transparency – standards with a large or small “s” that are adhered to. Yet finance has something that planes, trains and automobiles do not. Finance has central banks. And why do they care about innovation and change?

    First, for monetary analysis. For central banks to set interest rates to stabilise prices they have to understand the economy. The data collection and analysis of credit, demand, output, supply, costs, prices and labour markets all roll up to into determining monetary policy. And innovation can have a huge impact. AI is an obvious example. But digitalisation more broadly has had and will continue to have a fundamental impact on the global economy. For effective policymaking, central banks need to understand where things are heading. So they must follow and explore innovation and its implications. 

    Second, central banks care about innovation because of their oversight role. For prudential supervision of banks and market infrastructure, it is necessary to understand how technology is being used and the effect of any large changes. Financial stability analyses are increasingly concerned with how financial and operational risks interact. Technology is a significant variable in that analysis.

    Third, central banks do not just think; within their mandate, they act. To deliver on their monetary policy objectives, they decide where interest rates need to be. And then they act through their market operations to make that happen. Central banks want safe settlement and so they offer it – by operating payment systems to safely and reliably move substantial amounts of money every day. And they provide banknotes.

    It is because central banks act that they are really part of any change – not on the sidelines or just observing, but really involved. As part of the financial ecosystem, central banks offer settlement in central bank money, which is the safest settlement asset possible and a pillar of a stable and robust financial system. And this is what makes them so different from a regulator in any other space. To put it very simply, if central banks think technology is changing, they need to consider and adapt as well. And they need to change operations and systems that require the highest possible resilience from cyber threats and operational risk. That puts a very different slant on any decision and perhaps adds some caution. It might also add some practicality. And importantly for an economist, it gives central banks skin in the technology game – and the right incentives.

    Incentives matter. Trust in money is grounded on two things. The first is the central bank’s monetary policy framework and operational independence. The second is the competence to carry out its role. And that competence increasingly means the ability to use technology better. To do that we experiment. We collaborate. We get involved. But our role is not to win or to profit or to tell the private sector how to run their business. The private sector will always know what customers need and want better than the public sector. But it is also important to have the public sector involved, with public policy objectives such as stability, safety, interoperability and compliance.

    BIS and international cooperation

    To close I want to talk about how these themes of technology, change and incentives play out internationally. Central banks are different from one another. But I have spoken for almost 10 minutes about their interests and incentives as a homogeneous group. And if I can do that, they must be similar enough to cooperate.

    The BIS’s job is to help and guide central bank cooperation. Given what I have said, that should be easy. But collaboration is not always simple. Yet, with the right governance and communications, building knowledge by running projects together could reap great rewards for central banks.

    Our projects are “just” a first look at what is possible. Projects are not a commitment. Some of the questions like whether there is a need for central bank digital currency or digital identity can only be answered politically. The central bank is one of many advisers on a decision that should be made with other players in our societies. That is right and that is normal. Yet the fact remains, for good policymaking on any subject, you need understanding. And with technology, you need to experiment and collaborate to obtain that understanding. 

    So, I thank you again for the invitation and attention. I will close with a quote from Adam Smith: “I have never known much good done, by those who affected to trade for the public good.” Eerily, he foresaw a version of what US president Ronald Reagan famously highlighted as the nine most terrifying words: “I’m from the government and I’m here to help.” The BIS Innovation Hub has a mandate to explore technology and to develop public goods. But others ultimately decide what could be changed. Our job is to learn and advise them so that when change happens, it can happen for the better.

    Thank you for listening.  


    MIL OSI Economics

  • MIL-OSI Africa: IMF isn’t doing enough to support Africa: billions could be made available through special drawing rights

    Source: The Conversation – Africa – By Kevin P. Gallagher, Professor of Global Development Policy and Director, Global Development Policy Center, Boston University

    At the 2021 UN Climate Summit, Barbados prime minister Mia Mottley called for more and better use of special drawing rights (SDRs), the International Monetary Fund’s reserve asset.

    The special drawing right is an international reserve asset created by the IMF. It is not a currency – its value is based on a basket of five currencies, the biggest chunk of which is the US dollar, followed by the euro. It is a potential claim on the freely usable currencies of IMF members. Special drawing rights can provide a country with liquidity.

    Countries can use their special drawing rights to pay back IMF loans, or they can exchange them for foreign currencies.

    As Mottley is the newest president of the Climate Vulnerable Forum and Vulnerable Group of 20 (V20) finance ministers, which represents 68 climate-vulnerable countries that are among those with the most dire liquidity needs, including 32 African countries, her call would be directly beneficial to African countries.

    In August 2021, as the shock from the COVID-19 pandemic battered their economies, African countries received a lifeline of US$33 billion from special drawing rights. This amounts to more than all the climate finance Africa receives each year, and more than half of all annual official development assistance to Africa.

    This US$33 billion did not add to African countries’ debt burden, it did not come with any conditions, and it did not cost donors a single cent to provide.

    IMF members can vote to create new issuances of special drawing rights. They are then distributed to countries in proportion to their quotas in the IMF. Quotas are denominated in special drawing rights, the IMF’s unit of account.

    Quotas are the building blocks of the IMF’s financial and governance structure. An individual member country’s quota broadly reflects its relative position in the world economy. Thus, by design, the poorest and most vulnerable countries receive the least when it comes to quotas and voting shares.

    Special drawing rights cannot solve all of Africa’s economic challenges. And their highly technical nature means they are not always well understood. But at a time when African countries are facing chronic liquidity challenges – most countries in the region are spending more on debt service payments than they are on health, education, or climate change – our new research shows that special drawing rights can play an important role in establishing financial stability and enabling investments for development.

    Financial stability includes macroeconomic stability (such as low inflation, healthy balance of payments, sufficient foreign reserves), a strong financial system and resilience to shocks.

    African leaders are approaching a critical year-long opportunity: in November, the first Group of 20 (G20) summit will convene (with the African Union in attendance as a member for the first time). Then in December South Africa assumes the G20 presidency.


    Read more: South Africa will be president of the G20 in 2025: two much-needed reforms it should drive


    As African leaders advocate for reforms to the international financial architecture, maximising the potential of special drawing rights should be a central component of their agenda.

    The problem

    African countries’ finances are facing tough times. External debt in sub-Saharan Africa has tripled since 2008. The average government is now spending 12% of its revenue on external debt service. The COVID-19 pandemic, Russia’s war in Ukraine, and rises in interest rates and the prices of commodities, like food and fertiliser, have all contributed to this trend.

    Debt restructuring mechanisms have also proved inadequate. Countries like Zambia and Ghana got stuck in lengthy restructurings. Weak institutional capacity and poor governance also impede efficient use of public resources.

    At the same time, African economies need to increase investment to advance development, support a young and growing population, develop climate resilience and take advantage of the opportunity presented by the energy transition.

    To meet the resources for a just energy transition and the attainment of the UN 2030 Sustainable Development Goals, investment in climate and development will have to increase from around 24% of GDP (the average for Africa in 2022) to 37%.

    Special drawing rights have proved to be an important tool in addressing these challenges. Research by the IMF and others shows that African countries significantly benefited from the special drawing rights they received in 2021 to stabilise their economies. And this happened without worsening debt burdens or costing advanced economies any money, particularly as they cut development aid.

    However, advanced economies exercise significant control over the availability of special drawing rights. The IMF’s quota system determines both voting power and their distribution. Advanced economies control most of the IMF’s quotas.

    The advanced economies made the right decision in 2021 and in 2009 to issue new special drawing rights and the time has come again.

    The solution

    African and other global south leaders need to make a strong case for another issuance of special drawing rights at the IMF and World Bank meetings in Washington.

    In addition to a new issuance of special drawing rights, advanced economies still need to be pressured to re-channel the hundreds of billions of special drawing rights sitting idle on their balance sheets into productive purposes.

    The 2021 allocation of special drawing rights amounted to US$650 billion in total. But only US$33 billion went to African countries due to the IMF’s unequal quota distribution. Meanwhile advanced economies with powerful currencies and no need for special drawing rights received the lion’s share.

    The African Development Bank has spearheaded one such proposal alongside the Inter-American Development Bank. Under this plan, countries with unused special drawing rights could re-channel them to the African Development Bank as hybrid capital, allowing the bank to lend around $4 for each $1 of special drawing rights it receives.

    The IMF approved the use of special drawing rights as hybrid capital for multilateral development banks in May. But it set an excessively low limit of 15 billion special drawing rights across all multilateral development banks.

    Even so, advanced economies have been slow to re-channel special drawing rights. The close to $100 billion that have been re-channelled – mostly to IMF trust funds – is meaningful.

    But it still falls short of what should have been re-channelled.

    In the long term, IMF governance reforms are needed to avoid a repeat of the inefficient distribution of special drawing rights.


    Read more: The World Bank and the IMF need to keep reforming to become fit for purpose


    As African countries rightly push to change shortcomings of the international financial architecture, new special drawing rights issuances should be at the centre of such a strategy. The IMF’s 2021 special drawing rights issuance showed the tool’s scale and importance. And special drawing rights re-channelling has had positive effects in easing debt burdens and freeing up financing to recover from the COVID-19 pandemic.

    With 2030 approaching and the window shrinking for climate action, global leaders should be using all the tools at their disposal, including special drawing rights, to build a more resilient future.

    – IMF isn’t doing enough to support Africa: billions could be made available through special drawing rights
    – https://theconversation.com/imf-isnt-doing-enough-to-support-africa-billions-could-be-made-available-through-special-drawing-rights-241428

    MIL OSI Africa

  • MIL-OSI Global: IMF isn’t doing enough to support Africa: billions could be made available through special drawing rights

    Source: The Conversation – Africa – By Kevin P. Gallagher, Professor of Global Development Policy and Director, Global Development Policy Center, Boston University

    At the 2021 UN Climate Summit, Barbados prime minister Mia Mottley called for more and better use of special drawing rights (SDRs), the International Monetary Fund’s reserve asset.

    The special drawing right is an international reserve asset created by the IMF. It is not a currency – its value is based on a basket of five currencies, the biggest chunk of which is the US dollar, followed by the euro. It is a potential claim on the freely usable currencies of IMF members. Special drawing rights can provide a country with liquidity.

    Countries can use their special drawing rights to pay back IMF loans, or they can exchange them for foreign currencies.

    As Mottley is the newest president of the Climate Vulnerable Forum and Vulnerable Group of 20 (V20) finance ministers, which represents 68 climate-vulnerable countries that are among those with the most dire liquidity needs, including 32 African countries, her call would be directly beneficial to African countries.

    In August 2021, as the shock from the COVID-19 pandemic battered their economies, African countries received a lifeline of US$33 billion from special drawing rights. This amounts to more than all the climate finance Africa receives each year, and more than half of all annual official development assistance to Africa.

    This US$33 billion did not add to African countries’ debt burden, it did not come with any conditions, and it did not cost donors a single cent to provide.

    IMF members can vote to create new issuances of special drawing rights. They are then distributed to countries in proportion to their quotas in the IMF. Quotas are denominated in special drawing rights, the IMF’s unit of account.

    Quotas are the building blocks of the IMF’s financial and governance structure. An individual member country’s quota broadly reflects its relative position in the world economy. Thus, by design, the poorest and most vulnerable countries receive the least when it comes to quotas and voting shares.

    Special drawing rights cannot solve all of Africa’s economic challenges. And their highly technical nature means they are not always well understood. But at a time when African countries are facing chronic liquidity challenges – most countries in the region are spending more on debt service payments than they are on health, education, or climate change – our new research shows that special drawing rights can play an important role in establishing financial stability and enabling investments for development.

    Financial stability includes macroeconomic stability (such as low inflation, healthy balance of payments, sufficient foreign reserves), a strong financial system and resilience to shocks.

    African leaders are approaching a critical year-long opportunity: in November, the first Group of 20 (G20) summit will convene (with the African Union in attendance as a member for the first time). Then in December South Africa assumes the G20 presidency.




    Read more:
    South Africa will be president of the G20 in 2025: two much-needed reforms it should drive


    As African leaders advocate for reforms to the international financial architecture, maximising the potential of special drawing rights should be a central component of their agenda.

    The problem

    African countries’ finances are facing tough times. External debt in sub-Saharan Africa has tripled since 2008. The average government is now spending 12% of its revenue on external debt service. The COVID-19 pandemic, Russia’s war in Ukraine, and rises in interest rates and the prices of commodities, like food and fertiliser, have all contributed to this trend.

    Debt restructuring mechanisms have also proved inadequate. Countries like Zambia and Ghana got stuck in lengthy restructurings. Weak institutional capacity and poor governance also impede efficient use of public resources.

    At the same time, African economies need to increase investment to advance development, support a young and growing population, develop climate resilience and take advantage of the opportunity presented by the energy transition.

    To meet the resources for a just energy transition and the attainment of the UN 2030 Sustainable Development Goals, investment in climate and development will have to increase from around 24% of GDP (the average for Africa in 2022) to 37%.

    Special drawing rights have proved to be an important tool in addressing these challenges. Research by the IMF and others shows that African countries significantly benefited from the special drawing rights they received in 2021 to stabilise their economies. And this happened without worsening debt burdens or costing advanced economies any money, particularly as they cut development aid.

    However, advanced economies exercise significant control over the availability of special drawing rights. The IMF’s quota system determines both voting power and their distribution. Advanced economies control most of the IMF’s quotas.

    The advanced economies made the right decision in 2021 and in 2009 to issue new special drawing rights and the time has come again.

    The solution

    African and other global south leaders need to make a strong case for another issuance of special drawing rights at the IMF and World Bank meetings in Washington.

    In addition to a new issuance of special drawing rights, advanced economies still need to be pressured to re-channel the hundreds of billions of special drawing rights sitting idle on their balance sheets into productive purposes.

    The 2021 allocation of special drawing rights amounted to US$650 billion in total. But only US$33 billion went to African countries due to the IMF’s unequal quota distribution. Meanwhile advanced economies with powerful currencies and no need for special drawing rights received the lion’s share.

    The African Development Bank has spearheaded one such proposal alongside the Inter-American Development Bank. Under this plan, countries with unused special drawing rights could re-channel them to the African Development Bank as hybrid capital, allowing the bank to lend around $4 for each $1 of special drawing rights it receives.

    The IMF approved the use of special drawing rights as hybrid capital for multilateral development banks in May. But it set an excessively low limit of 15 billion special drawing rights across all multilateral development banks.

    Even so, advanced economies have been slow to re-channel special drawing rights. The close to $100 billion that have been re-channelled – mostly to IMF trust funds – is meaningful.

    But it still falls short of what should have been re-channelled.

    In the long term, IMF governance reforms are needed to avoid a repeat of the inefficient distribution of special drawing rights.




    Read more:
    The World Bank and the IMF need to keep reforming to become fit for purpose


    As African countries rightly push to change shortcomings of the international financial architecture, new special drawing rights issuances should be at the centre of such a strategy. The IMF’s 2021 special drawing rights issuance showed the tool’s scale and importance. And special drawing rights re-channelling has had positive effects in easing debt burdens and freeing up financing to recover from the COVID-19 pandemic.

    With 2030 approaching and the window shrinking for climate action, global leaders should be using all the tools at their disposal, including special drawing rights, to build a more resilient future.

    Abebe Shimeles received funding from African Economic Research Consortium. He is affiliated with Institute of Labor Studies, IZA

    Kevin P. Gallagher does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. IMF isn’t doing enough to support Africa: billions could be made available through special drawing rights – https://theconversation.com/imf-isnt-doing-enough-to-support-africa-billions-could-be-made-available-through-special-drawing-rights-241428

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI USA: Hickenlooper Applauds $162 Million in Inflation Reduction Act Funding for Colorado’s LongPath to Help Stop Methane Leaks

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Colorado John Hickenlooper

    Today’s news finalizes the initial agreement announced in January

    Funding comes thanks the Inflation Reduction Act Hickenlooper helped pass into law

    WASHINGTON – Today, U.S. Senator John Hickenlooper celebrated the news that Colorado-based LongPath Technologies received a $162.3 million loan guarantee from the Department of Energy (DOE) to finance the construction and installation of more than 1,000 remote real-time methane monitoring towers in oil and gas production basins across the West. In January, DOE had announced the initial agreement with LongPath Technologies. The funding comes from the Inflation Reduction Act, which Hickenlooper helped pass into law.

    As governor, Hickenlooper brought together environmentalists and the oil industry to create the world’s first methane regulations. Those regulations were used by President Obama as a model for national standards which in turn were used as a basis for the international methane pledge in 2021.

    “As governor, we made sure Colorado led the country with the first methane regulations of their kind,” said Hickenlooper. “We’re building on that leadership to create real-time methane emissions monitoring for the rest of the country thanks to these Inflation Reduction Act investments and our homegrown innovators like LongPath.”

    “Preventing harmful greenhouse emissions from entering our atmosphere is a key pillar of President Biden and Vice President’s Harris’ Investing in America agenda to improve public health while combatting climate change,” said U.S. Secretary of Energy Jennifer M. Granholm. “Today’s announcement underscores the Biden-Harris Administration continued efforts to create environmentally resilient communities and ensure the United States leads the world in deploying next-generation clean energy solutions.”

    The financing from DOE’s Loan Programs Office (LPO) will support LongPath in the installation and deployment of up to 24,000 square miles of monitoring coverage. If finalized, the network is expected to prevent methane emissions equivalent to at least six million tons of carbon dioxide annually – equivalent to 1.3 million gasoline powered vehicles – by enabling subscribers to identify and respond to methane leaks quickly. At its peak, the project is anticipated to create an estimated 35 construction jobs and 266 operations jobs for regional workers, including trained experts to install and maintain the equipment, and provide competitive benefits. LongPath also provides internship opportunities with the University of Colorado to engage the future generation in technology-based climate solutions.

    Emissions of methane, a greenhouse gas up to 80 times more potent than carbon dioxide, occur across the oil and gas sector. Leaks during oil and gas production and compression, which are difficult to identify across vast production areas, are a major source of U.S. methane emissions. The longer leaks go undetected, the more planet-warming greenhouse gas enters the atmosphere.

    Today, methane leak monitoring is typically conducted via flyovers or using methods such as optical gas imaging cameras, which can leave major gaps in emissions monitoring over time and space. LongPath’s technology continuously identifies, localizes, and quantifies methane emissions more rapidly and at lower detection levels than conventional methods, allowing operators to mitigate leaks earlier and more often. This is particularly true because emissions are intermittent – only continuous monitoring can reliably detect these kinds of emission sources.

    LongPath technology was developed at the University of Colorado and the National Institutes of Standards and Technology (NIST).

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Security: Tulsa Man Sentenced for Possessing and Distributing Sexually Explicit Content of Minors

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    TULSA, Okla. – U.S. District Judge John D. Russell sentenced Brian Harris Carlile, 31, for Receipt, Distribution, and Possession of Child Pornography in Indian Country. Judge Russell ordered Carlile to 121 months imprisonment, followed by 10 years of supervised release. Upon his release, Carlile will also be required to register as a sex offender. Restitution for the victims will be determined at a later date.

    From June 2023 through September 2023, Carlile admittingly used his cell phone to possess, receive, and distribute images and videos that contained minors engaging in sexually explicit conduct. Many of the images or videos that Carlile possessed included minors under the age of 12.

    Carlile is a citizen of the Muscogee (Creek) Nation. He will remain in custody pending transfer to the U.S. Bureau of Prisons.

    The Homeland Security Investigations and Tulsa County Sheriff’s Office investigated the case. Assistant U.S. Attorney Ashley Robert prosecuted the case.

    This case was brought as part of Project Safe Childhood (PSC), a nationwide initiative to combat the growing epidemic of child sexual exploitation and abuse launched in May 2006 by the Department of Justice. U.S. Attorneys’ Offices and the Criminal Division’s Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section leads PSC, which marshals federal, state and local resources to locate, apprehend and prosecute individuals who sexually exploit children and identifies and rescues victims. For more information about PSC, please visit DOJ’s PSC page. For more information about internet safety education, please visit the resources tab on that page

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Security: Former Eastern Kentucky Pharamacist Sentenced for Healthcare Fraud

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    LONDON, Ky. – A Corbin, Ky., woman and former pharmacist, Stephanie Collins, 57, has been sentenced to 20 months, by U.S. District Judge Claria Horn Boom, for her role in a scheme to defraud Medicare and Medicaid, by billing for medications that she never dispensed to her customers.  

    According to her plea agreement, Collins operated as a registered pharmacist and operated Stephanie’s Down Home Pharmacy, a retail pharmacy located in Corbin.  The pharmacy sought reimbursement from Medicare and Kentucky Medicaid for the drugs and other medical products it dispensed to its customers.  As part of the scheme to defraud these taxpayer-funded health care benefit programs, Collins used the pharmacy’s computer system to submit claims for payment for prescription drugs that patients never picked up or otherwise received.  Collins also submitted fraudulent claims for diabetic test strips, billing Kentucky Medicaid for more expensive test strips when she was actually giving her customers lower-cost test strips.  In total, her false and fraudulent claims caused Kentucky Medicaid and Medicare to reimburse Collins’ pharmacy $730,055.78.

    Under federal law, Collins must serve 85 percent of her prison sentence.  Upon her release from prison, she will be under the supervision of the U.S. Probation Office for two years. The Court also ordered Collins to pay $730,055.78 in restitution.

    Carlton S. Shier, IV, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Kentucky; Erek Davodowich, Acting Special Agent in Charge, DEA, Louisville Field Division; Karen Wingerd, Special Agent in Charge, Internal Revenue Service – Criminal Investigation; and Tamala E. Miles, Special Agent in Charge, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General (HHS-OIG), jointly announced the sentence.

    The case was investigated by the DEA, IRS, HHS-OIG; the Kentucky Cabinet for Health and Family Services, Office of Inspector General, Drug Enforcement and Professional Practices Branch; and the Kentucky Board of Pharmacy.  Assistant U.S. Attorney Andy Smith prosecuted the case on behalf of the United States. 

    — END —

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Economics: Advancing biodiversity with AI

    Source: Microsoft

    Headline: Advancing biodiversity with AI

    The health of our society is deeply intertwined with the health of our planet. While much of the global conversation around the environment focuses on the devastating impacts of climate change, it is crucial to recognize that climate and biodiversity are part of a broader ecological system. The loss and degradation of nature is both a result of and a contributor to climate disruption, as healthy ecosystems play a vital role in regulating the climate. Since 1970, global wildlife populations have plummeted by 70%. And in the last century, nearly 500 vertebrate species have been lost forever. 

    This week, leaders from around the world are gathering for COP16, a United Nations conference in Cali, Colombia, to drive actions to reverse this trend. COP16 will focus on advancing global efforts to implement the UN Biodiversity Plan, which highlights the critical role that companies must play in building a nature-positive world. 

    Microsoft is committed to helping the world drive progress on the UN Biodiversity Plan. Using our technology, investment, and voice, we work to advance the protection and restoration of nature.  Microsoft will be participating in COP16 to share our work and learnings, participate in high-level meetings and panel discussions, and perhaps most importantly, listen, to explore what more we can do to tackle this critical challenge together. 

    Leveraging AI to Boost Biodiversity  

    At Microsoft, we believe we must use technology that matches the scale and complexity of the challenges we face. Given the vastness and complexity of Earth’s ecosystems, AI is emerging as an indispensable conservation tool. AI can empower us with the speed and scale necessary to analyze and better understand Earth’s biodiversity. 

    Technology can not only coexist with nature but help it thrive. One such example is Project Guacamaya, which combines the power of AI with satellite imagery, wildlife imagery, and acoustic data to monitor deforestation and protect biodiversity in the Amazon. Nearly five million acres of the Amazon were deforested in 2022, a 21% increase from the previous year. Thanks to Project Guacamaya, a joint effort of the CinfonIA Research Center at Universidad de los Andes, Instituto SINCHI, Instituto Humboldt, Planet Labs PBC and Microsoft AI for Good Lab, AI is helping protect this tremendous natural resource.   

    YouTube Video

    One aspect of Project Guacamaya involves using AI to identify bird and non-bird sounds in the Amazon. The project has so far analyzed more than 100,000 sounds and achieved over 80% reliability in species identification. Because AI offers real-time analysis, this tool allows researchers and conservationists to respond quickly and effectively to ecological shifts. As Zhongqi Miao, AI for Good Lab’s lead bioacoustics research scientist, noted, “By converting sounds from nature into measurable data, AI helps monitor wildlife populations and track changes in ecosystems.”  

    Building AI and Conservation Skills 

    It’s imperative that the global workforce be prepared to address the biodiversity crisis. This means training more green talent. A LinkedIn study found that the share of green talent in 48 evaluated countries increased by a median of 12.3% between 2022 and 2023. This is promising progress, but we must increase the momentum: the same study found that only one in eight workers around the world has at least one green skill, such as those related to solar power or electric vehicles.  

    We also need to ensure that our green workforce can leverage technology to advance sustainability. Applying advanced AI models in real-world conservation scenarios can be challenging due to their complexity and the need for specialized knowledge. That’s why researchers involved with Project Guacamaya released Pytorch Wildlife, an open-source platform available on GitHub designed for creating, modifying, and sharing powerful AI conservation models.  

    Pytorch Wildlife’s intuitive, user-friendly interface, accessible through local installation or Hugging Face, enables users to detect and classify animals in images and videos. With an emphasis on usability and accessibility, Pytorch Wildlife can be used by individuals with limited or no technical background. It also offers a modular codebase to simplify feature expansion and further development. 

    Strengthening Corporate Investments in Nature 

    In 2020, Microsoft launched a new ecosystems and biodiversity initiative in which we pledged to protect more land than we use while leveraging our voice, tools, and investments to protect and restore ecosystems. We know that our efforts alone won’t be enough to drive the pace and scale of progress needed. When it comes to advancing biodiversity and sustainability, governments, the science community, NGOs, and the private sector all have a vital role to play.   

    Other Microsoft efforts to boost biodiversity in Latin America include projects to restore and protect freshwater ecosystems in São Paulo; drive wetland restoration through on-the-ground efforts, public policy advocacy, collective action, and scientific research in Chile; restore traditional wetland agriculture methods to conserve Lake Xochimilco and the Axolotl; and protect 236,000 acres in the biodiversity hotspot of Belize’s Maya Forest.  

    Our nature-based carbon removal investments, including those with Mombak and BTG Pactual, are also aligned with our commitment to become carbon negative by 2030. Our agreement with BTG Pactual, which is the largest known carbon dioxide removal credit transaction to date, is part of BTG Pactual’s $1 billion reforestation and restoration strategy in Latin America. Parties interested in learning more should join us for a panel discussion with BTG Pactual at the Bloom 24 event in Cali, Colombia, on October 25. 

    Through our $1 billion Climate Innovation Fund, we support innovative solutions that can provide scaled positive impact for people and the planet across our four sustainability pillars: carbon, water, waste, and ecosystem. The companies in our portfolio are pairing cutting-edge technologies and datasets with the latest in Internet of Things (IoT), machine learning, and cloud computing, to create data-driven solutions that enable better decision-making and action for natural ecosystems. Our recent investments include: 

    • Yard Stick – a soil carbon monitoring, reporting, and verification (MRV) company that has created an innovative soil carbon IoT device, paired with data analytics and insights to measure and track soil carbon at farm scale.
    • Vibrant Planet – a prioritization system for land management restoration efforts.
    • Farmland LP – an investment management firm that buys conventional farmland and transitions it to organic farmland, utilizing regenerative agriculture practices.    

    Lessons for the Future 

    Over the last four years, we have made progress in contributing to a nature-positive world. However, our journey has not been without challenges. There is more to do and more to learn. It can be difficult for companies to invest holistically in ecosystem health because they often lack the knowledge, tools, and incentives needed to do so. Recently, we collaborated with an international team of experts to explore what is needed to overcome these challenges. In this whitepaper, we outline eight important lessons:  

    1. Build incentives to invest in ecosystem health: Establish mechanisms that recognize and reward companies for investing in nature-based solutions that improve ecosystem health and ensure local community benefits and stewardship. 
    2. Agree on science-based standards for ecosystem health: Civil society and companies need to collaborate with scientists to agree on corporate standards for characterizing how sustainability investments affect ecosystem health. 
    3. Make science accessible and build capacity to use it: All actors need to use the best available science to evaluate ecological and social risks, design projects that enhance ecosystem health, and assess it effectively.   
    4. Accept tradeoffs and work to minimize them: While not all sustainability benefits can be maximized at once, strategic planning can reduce negative impacts and optimize positive outcomes.  
    5. Innovate to derisk investment: Nature-based investments face risks from the variability of natural systems; better tools are needed to understand, insure, and manage these risks. 
    6. Expand blended finance: Combining public and private capital can reduce financial risks to private investors and attract more investment into nature-based solutions. 
    7. Invest beyond capital: While funding is vital, projects and startups also need strategic support, including expertise, long-term demand signals, and market access. 
    8. Leverage AI for scale, speed, and reliability: AI can help companies prioritize ecosystem health by enabling cheaper, more effective measurement, trade-off analysis, and risk management.  

    The challenges facing our ecosystems are substantial, but so too are the resources at our disposal. Our COP16 convening in Cali ahead of COP30 in Brazil next year will help bring much-needed global focus to this critical topic in a vibrant part of our planet – known for its unparalleled biodiversity and its important role in regulating climate patterns and safeguarding ecosystems globally. We are looking forward to continuing to explore ways we can collectively take action and leverage technology to protect and preserve ecosystems for generations to come.   

    Tags: AI, AI for Earth, AI for Good, AI for Good Labs, biodiversity, Climate Innovation Fund, Environment, Environmental Sustainability, sustainability

    MIL OSI Economics

  • MIL-OSI USA: Cassidy Announces $20.3 Million for Louisiana Airports from His Infrastructure Law

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Louisiana Bill Cassidy

    WASHINGTON – U.S. Senator Bill Cassidy, M.D. (R-LA) announced the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) will grant Louisiana airports $20,300,000.00 from the Airport Terminal Program in his Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA). 
    “Investing in Louisiana’s airports is key to building our economy for 2050,” said Dr. Cassidy. “This funding from the Infrastructure Law will support improvements in New Orleans, Shreveport, and Monroe.”

    Grant Awarded
    Recipient
    Project Description

    $10,800,000.00
    Louis Armstrong New Orleans International Airport
    This grant will provide federal funding for construction of a shuttle bus connector road to connect the airport’s two terminals, provide access to future multi modal infrastructure, and increase the efficient and safe movement of passengers and baggage. It also constructs a portion of the northern section of the roadway connecting the Interstate 10 flyover bridge for airport shuttles with associated utility relocation and pile foundations.

    $7,000,000.00
    Shreveport Regional Airport
    This grant will provide federal funding for the relocation and reconstruction of an FAA-operated Air Traffic Control Tower to correct line of sight issues and construction of the access road, associated utilities, and site preparation for tower relocation.

    $2,500,000.00
    Monroe Regional Airport
    This grant will provide federal funding for the replacement and installation of two existing passenger boarding bridges, which will increase ADA accessibility, energy efficiency, and accommodate the larger aircraft.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Security: Jury Finds Little Rock Man Guilty of Possession with Intent to Distribute Fentanyl, Methamphetamine, Cocaine, and Marijuana

    Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) State Crime Alerts (b)

          LITTLE ROCK—A Little Rock man has been convicted of possession with intent to distribute fentanyl, methamphetamine, cocaine, and marijuana at the conclusion of a three-day trial. On Thursday, a federal jury found Marquis Hunt, 42, guilty of four federal narcotics violations: and possession with intent to distribute 400 grams or more of fentanyl, possession with intent to distribute 500 grams or more of methamphetamine, possession with intent to distribute cocaine, and possession with intent to distribute marijuana.

          The jury returned their verdict after deliberating for approximately 2.5 hours. United States District Judge James M. Moody, Jr. presided over the trial and will sentence Hunt at a later date. Hunt faces a minimum sentence of 10 years in federal prison, with a maximum of life imprisonment. There is no parole in the federal system.

          Hunt was indicted by a federal grand jury on third superseding indictment on August 6, 2024. An investigation revealed that on July 8, 2022, a special agent with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) made contact with Hunt at a residence in southwest Little Rock. Hunt was detained while a search warrant was obtained and executed. During a search, agents located more than 1.5 pounds of methamphetamine and more than 16 pounds of fentanyl throughout the residence, as well as distributable amounts of cocaine and marijuana. Through further investigation, it was discovered that the fentanyl was distributed or sprayed on a shredded vegetable material with a mixture of tramadol, which made it appear to be a form of synthetic marijuana or “K2.” During the jury trial, Hunt acknowledged selling drugs, but then denied selling the drugs located at the residence.

          The methamphetamine and fentanyl convictions carry minimum statutory sentences of not less than 10 years and not more than life in prison, not less than five years supervised release, and a fine of not more than $10,000,000. The cocaine conviction carries a maximum sentence of 20 years, not less than four years supervised release, and a fine of not more than $1,000,000. The marijuana conviction carries a maximum sentence of five years imprisonment, not less than two years supervised release, and a fine of not more than $250,000.

          The investigation was conducted by the FBI with assistance from the Arkansas State Police and Arkansas State Crime Laboratory. The and the case was prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Amanda Fields and Reese Lancaster.

    # # #

    Additional information about the office of the

    United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Arkansas, is available online at

    https://www.justice.gov/edar

    X (formerly known as Twitter):

    @USAO_EDAR 

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Security: St. Cloud Man Sentenced to Ten Years in Prison for Attempting to Entice a Child to Engage in Sexual Activity

    Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) State Crime Alerts (b)

    Ahead of the Threat Podcast: Episode Zero

    Welcome to Ahead of the Threat, the FBI’s new podcast miniseries that brings together an FBI cyber executive and a private sector chief information security officer. Join Bryan Vorndran, assistant director of the FBI’s Cyber Division, and Jamil Farshchi, a strategic engagement advisor for the FBI who also works as an executive vice president and CISO of Equifax, as they discuss emerging cyber threats and the enduring importance of cybersecurity fundamentals. Featuring distinguished guests from the business world and government, Ahead of the Threat will confront some of the biggest questions in cyber: How will emerging technology impact corporate America? How can corporate boards be structured for cyber resilience? What does the FBI think about generative artificial intelligence? Listen to new episodes biweekly and stay Ahead of the Threat.

    Charity and Disaster Fraud

    Charity fraud scams can come in many forms: emails, social media posts, crowdfunding platforms, cold calls, etc. They are especially common after high-profile disasters. Always use caution and do your research when you’re looking to donate to charitable causes.

    RYAN JAMES WEDDING

    Conspiracy to Distribute and Possess with Intent to Distribute Controlled Substances; Conspiracy to Export Cocaine; Continuing Criminal Enterprise; Murder in Connection with a Continuing Criminal Enterprise and Drug Crime; Attempt to Commit…

    Capitol Violence

    The FBI is seeking to identify individuals involved in the violent activities that occurred at the U.S. Capitol and surrounding areas on January 6, 2021. View photos and related information here. If you have any information to provide, visit tips.fbi.gov or call 1-800-CALL-FBI.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Security: Man Arrested for Exposing Himself on an Aircraft

    Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) State Crime Alerts (b)

    BOSTON – A man was arrested and charged yesterday for allegedly masturbating and exposing himself within the view of two other passengers seated near him on board a flight from Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates to Boston, Mass. yesterday.

    Krishna Kunapuli, 39, of India, was charged by criminal complaint with one count of lewd, indecent and obscene acts while in the special aircraft jurisdiction of the United States. Kunapuli was arrested yesterday and will appear in federal court in Boston later today.

    According to the charging documents, Kunapuli allegedly made unwanted sexual advances toward a female passenger on board an Etihad Airlines flight, including touching her hair and taking pictures of her without her permission. After a crew member intervened, Kunapuli returned to his seat.

    It is alleged that, later in the flight, two male passengers seated near Kunapuli noticed Kunapuli masturbating under a blanket and, at times, with his penis fully exposed. One of the passengers reported this conduct to a flight attendant who intervened and alerted law enforcement.

    The charge of lewd, indecent and obscene acts while in the special aircraft jurisdiction of the United States provides for a sentence of up to 90 days in prison, up to one year of supervised release and a fine of up to $5,000. Sentences are imposed by a federal district court judge based upon the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and statutes which govern the determination of a sentence in a criminal case.

    Acting United States Attorney Joshua S. Levy; Jodi Cohen, Special Agent in Charge of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Boston Division; and Colonel Geoffrey D. Noble of the Massachusetts State Police made the announcement today. Assistant U.S. Attorney Elianna J. Nuzum of the Major Crimes Unit is prosecuting the case.

    The details contained in the charging documents are allegations. The defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Security: ‘Operation Not Forgotten’ Shines New Light on Indian Country Cases

    Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) State Crime Alerts (b)

    Ahead of the Threat Podcast: Episode Zero

    Welcome to Ahead of the Threat, the FBI’s new podcast miniseries that brings together an FBI cyber executive and a private sector chief information security officer. Join Bryan Vorndran, assistant director of the FBI’s Cyber Division, and Jamil Farshchi, a strategic engagement advisor for the FBI who also works as an executive vice president and CISO of Equifax, as they discuss emerging cyber threats and the enduring importance of cybersecurity fundamentals. Featuring distinguished guests from the business world and government, Ahead of the Threat will confront some of the biggest questions in cyber: How will emerging technology impact corporate America? How can corporate boards be structured for cyber resilience? What does the FBI think about generative artificial intelligence? Listen to new episodes biweekly and stay Ahead of the Threat.

    Charity and Disaster Fraud

    Charity fraud scams can come in many forms: emails, social media posts, crowdfunding platforms, cold calls, etc. They are especially common after high-profile disasters. Always use caution and do your research when you’re looking to donate to charitable causes.

    RYAN JAMES WEDDING

    Conspiracy to Distribute and Possess with Intent to Distribute Controlled Substances; Conspiracy to Export Cocaine; Continuing Criminal Enterprise; Murder in Connection with a Continuing Criminal Enterprise and Drug Crime; Attempt to Commit…

    Capitol Violence

    The FBI is seeking to identify individuals involved in the violent activities that occurred at the U.S. Capitol and surrounding areas on January 6, 2021. View photos and related information here. If you have any information to provide, visit tips.fbi.gov or call 1-800-CALL-FBI.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Security: Kyle Man Sentenced to 50 Years in Federal Prison

    Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) State Crime Alerts (b)

    RAPID CITY – United States Attorney Alison J. Ramsdell announced today that U.S. District Judge Camela C. Theeler has sentenced a Kyle, South Dakota, man convicted of four counts of Aggravated Sexual Abuse of a Minor, one count of Abusive Sexual Contact, and one count of Witness Tampering. The sentencing took place on October 17, 2024.

    Lloyd Emerson Elk, 48, was sentenced to a total of 50 years in federal prison on each count of Aggravated Sexual Abuse, followed by 10 years of supervised release, and was ordered to pay a $600 special assessment to the Federal Crime Victims Fund. He was also sentenced to five years in prison for Abusive Sexual Contact and 25 years in prison on the Witness Tampering conviction.  The sentences were ordered to run concurrently. 

    Elk was indicted by a federal grand jury in March of 2024. He was found guilty following a two-day jury trial in July of 2024.  At the sentencing hearing, Judge Theeler reflected Elk’s long pattern of violence was very concerning to her. She noted, “Crimes against children are some of the most heinous crimes . . .  Adults in positions of power can abuse that position, take away the innocence of a child and hurt them.”   

    Elk, a former tribal law enforcement officer, sexually abused his stepdaughter multiple times when she was between the ages of five and seven years old.  Elk employed years of domestic violence to control the victim and her family, including physical and emotional abuse.  Elk told the victim if she ever told anyone about the sexual abuse, that he would kill her, her mother, and her brother.  When the victim finally disclosed the abuse in late 2023, the investigation revealed Elk had sexually abused another seven-year-old girl in 1998—while employed as a police officer in Idaho—and made similar threats to her to keep her quiet.

    “Every instance of child sexual abuse is simultaneously shocking and heartbreaking,” said U.S. Attorney Alison J. Ramsdell. “But it is unthinkable that such victimization would happen at the hands of a law enforcement officer. It took great courage for the victims in this case to come forward with the truth, and we are grateful to our partners at the FBI who expertly investigated the matter so that our prosecutors could bring this violent defendant to justice, once and for all. The U.S. Attorney’s Office will never yield in our steadfast commitment to protecting women and children from violence.”

    This case was investigated by the FBI. Assistant U.S. Attorneys Anna Lindrooth and Megan Poppen prosecuted the case. Elk was immediately remanded to the custody of the U.S. Marshals Service. 

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Security: Member of Multi-State Gas Pump Skimming Device and Fuel Theft Ring Pleads Guilty to Aggravated Identity Theft and Fraud Charges

    Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) State Crime News

    Jacksonville, Florida – United States Attorney Roger B. Handberg announces that Deonelky Tabares Cid (36, Tampa) has pleaded guilty to conspiracy, four counts of wire fraud, six counts of access device fraud, and one count of aggravated identity theft. Cid faces a minimum penalty of 2 years in federal prison on the count of aggravated identity theft, up to 20 years in federal prison on each count of wire fraud, up to 10 years in federal prison on each count of access device fraud, up to 5 years in federal prison on the conspiracy count, and payment of restitution to the victims he and his co-defendants defrauded. No sentencing date has been set.

    According to court documents, Cid and his co-conspirators worked together to install skimmers on gas pumps to include gas stations in Alabama, Louisiana, and Northern Florida, including the Florida Panhandle. The conspirators used the skimmers to illegally obtain credit and debit card account numbers involved with the purchase of fuel by customers at the gas pump. Using the account numbers stolen by the skimmers, they subsequently made counterfeit credit and debit cards and then, used them to purchase large amount of diesel fuel.

    During the conspiracy, Cid and others drove vehicles that contained a fuel bladder system. This system allowed the conspirators to fake pumping gas into the vehicle’s gas tank when in fact the diesel fuel was being pumped into the fuel bladder system. Analysis by law enforcement of fuel purchases, vehicle tracker data, gas station video surveillance, and real time surveillance of the conspirators determined that Cid and other conspirators drove to multiple case stations throughout Northern Florida. After obtaining the gas, the conspirators offloaded the stolen fuel into 9,500-gallon tanker trucks at a fuel yard. The stolen fuel was then sold to a gas station associated with one of the co-conspirators.

    The co-defendants, Luis Edel Trujillo Pena (29, Miami), Deyvis Hernandez (37, Miami), Luis Ernesto Vigil Ochoa (32, Miami), and Isvaldo Guerra Perdomo (38, Jacksonville) are set for trial in January 2025.   

    This case was investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, the Florida Highway Patrol, the Jacksonville Sheriff’s Office, the U.S. General Services Administration – Office of Inspector General, and the U.S. Secret Service – Jacksonville Field Office. It is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Kevin C. Frein.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Security: Texas Man Indicted for Coercion and Enticement of a Minor to Engage in Sexual Activity and Receipt of Child Sex Abuse Material

    Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) State Crime News

    Tampa, Florida – United States Attorney Roger B. Handberg announces the return of an indictment charging James Anthony Davila (20, Cleburne, TX) with coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in sexual activity and receipt of child sex abuse material. If convicted, Davila faces a mandatory penalty of 10 years, up to life, in federal prison for the coercion and enticement count, and a mandatory 5 years, up to 20 years, in federal prison for receiving child sex abuse material. 

    According to court documents, Davila met a 12-year-old girl online while playing a video game. The two continued to communicate and exchanged sexually explicit photos. Davila later drove from Texas to Florida to pick up the child and engage in sexual acts with her. 

    An indictment is merely a formal charge that a defendant has committed one or more violations of federal criminal law, and every defendant is presumed innocent unless, and until, proven guilty.          

    This case was investigated by the Tampa Police Department and the Federal Bureau of Investigation, with assistance from the Midway (Florida) Police Department and the Johnson County (Texas) Sheriff’s Office. It will be prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Ross Roberts.

    This is another case brought as part of Project Safe Childhood, a nationwide initiative launched in May 2006 by the Department of Justice to combat the growing epidemic of child sexual exploitation and abuse. Led by the United States Attorneys’ Offices and the Criminal Division’s Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section, Project Safe Childhood marshals federal, state, and local resources to locate, apprehend, and prosecute individuals who sexually exploit children, and to identify and rescue victims. For more information about Project Safe Childhood, please visit www.justice.gov/psc.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Security: U.S. Attorney Tessa M. Gorman Names District Election Officer

    Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) State Crime News

    Ahead of the Threat Podcast: Episode Zero

    Welcome to Ahead of the Threat, the FBI’s new podcast miniseries that brings together an FBI cyber executive and a private sector chief information security officer. Join Bryan Vorndran, assistant director of the FBI’s Cyber Division, and Jamil Farshchi, a strategic engagement advisor for the FBI who also works as an executive vice president and CISO of Equifax, as they discuss emerging cyber threats and the enduring importance of cybersecurity fundamentals. Featuring distinguished guests from the business world and government, Ahead of the Threat will confront some of the biggest questions in cyber: How will emerging technology impact corporate America? How can corporate boards be structured for cyber resilience? What does the FBI think about generative artificial intelligence? Listen to new episodes biweekly and stay Ahead of the Threat.

    Charity and Disaster Fraud

    Charity fraud scams can come in many forms: emails, social media posts, crowdfunding platforms, cold calls, etc. They are especially common after high-profile disasters. Always use caution and do your research when you’re looking to donate to charitable causes.

    RYAN JAMES WEDDING

    Conspiracy to Distribute and Possess with Intent to Distribute Controlled Substances; Conspiracy to Export Cocaine; Continuing Criminal Enterprise; Murder in Connection with a Continuing Criminal Enterprise and Drug Crime; Attempt to Commit…

    Capitol Violence

    The FBI is seeking to identify individuals involved in the violent activities that occurred at the U.S. Capitol and surrounding areas on January 6, 2021. View photos and related information here. If you have any information to provide, visit tips.fbi.gov or call 1-800-CALL-FBI.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Security: Belgian National Charged with Attempting to Breach Cockpit and Assaulting Flight Crew Members on March 2024 Flight

    Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) State Crime Alerts (c)

    NEWARK, N.J. – A Belgian national was arrested today for attempting to breach the cockpit and assaulting flight attendants aboard flight from Newark Liberty International Airport to Zurich, Switzerland, in March 2024, U.S. Attorney Philip Sellinger announced.

    Jan Daeninck, 43, of Belgium, is charged by complaint with one count of interference with flight crew members and attendants by assault and intimidation, one count of assault, and one count of abusive sexual contact on an airplane. He appeared before U.S. Magistrate Judge U.S. Magistrate Judge Leda Dunn Wettre in Newark federal court and was released on $100,000 unsecured bond.

    According to documents filed in this case and statements made in court:

    On March 31, 2024, Daeninck was a passenger aboard a Swiss International Airlines flight from Newark to Zurich. Shortly after takeoff, Daeninck walked up to a female flight attendant, grabbed both of her breasts with his hands, shook her, and began yelling at her. After the flight attendant was able to wrest herself away from Daeninck, he then approached and attempted to enter the cockpit, repeatedly striking, kicking and beating the cockpit door. While Daeninck was attempting to gain entrance to the cockpit, a male flight attendant approached Daeninck. After repeatedly striking, punching, and kicking the cockpit door and failing to gain entry to the cockpit, Daeninck assaulted the male flight attendant by repeatedly punching and kicking the flight attendant, striking him in head and upper body with a closed fist. Flight crew members were able to intervene and assist with restraining Daeninck on the floor in the vicinity of the cockpit door for the remainder of the flight. As a result of Daeninck’s actions, the flight turned around and landed back at Newark Liberty International Airport.

    The charge of interfering with flight crew members and attendants carries a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison and a maximum fine of $250,000. The charge of assault by beating or striking carries a maximum punishment of one year in prison and a maximum fine of $100,000. The charge of abusive sexual contact carries a maximum sentence of two years in prison and a maximum fine of $250,000.

    U.S. Attorney Sellinger credited special agents of the FBI, under the direction of Acting Special Agent in Charge Nelson I. Delgado in Newark, with the investigation leading to the charge. He also thanked the Port Authority Police Department, under the direction of Edward T. Cetnar, for its assistance.

    The government is represented by Assistant U.S. Attorney Michelle L. Goldman of the Office’s General Crimes Unit in Newark.

    The charges and allegations contained in the complaint are merely accusations, and the defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Security: Orange County Supervisor Agrees to Plead Guilty to Bribery Conspiracy Involving $10 Million in COVID Relief Funds

    Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) State Crime Alerts (b)

    OC Supervisor Andrew Do Admits Receiving More Than $550,000 in Bribe Payments from Funds Meant to Be Used to Provide Meals to Elderly

    SANTA ANA, California – The District One Supervisor on the Orange County Board of Supervisors has agreed to plead guilty to a felony federal charge for accepting more than $550,000 in bribes for directing and voting in favor of more than $10 million in COVID funds to a charity affiliated with one of his daughters, Rhiannon Do, the Justice Department announced today. 

    Andrew Hoang Do, 62, agreed to plead guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit bribery concerning programs receiving federal funds. His plea agreement and information were filed today. He is expected to make his initial appearance in United States District Court in Santa Ana later this month.

    Do is one of five supervisors on the Orange County Board of Supervisors, which is responsible for the county’s $9 billion annual budget. As a county supervisor, Do represents the cities of Cypress, Fountain Valley, Garden Grove, Huntington Beach, La Palma, Los Alamitos, Midway City, Rossmoor, Seal Beach, and Westminster. He has served as a county supervisor since February 2015.

    As part of his plea agreement, Do admitted that in exchange for more than $550,000 in bribes, beginning in 2020, he voted in favor of and directed millions of dollars in COVID-related funds to Viet America Society (VAS), a charity affiliated with his daughter. Do directed and worked together with other county employees to approve contracts with – and payments to – VAS. Do further admitted he acted corruptly and abused his position of trust as a county supervisor.

    “By putting his own interests over those of his constituents, the defendant sold his high office and betrayed the public’s trust,” said United States Attorney Martin Estrada.  “Even worse, the money he misappropriated and accepted as bribe payments was taken from those most in need – older adults and disabled residents. Our community deserved much better. Corruption has no place in our politics and my office will continue to hold accountable officials who cheat the public.”

    “While millions of Americans were dying from COVID-19, Orange County Supervisor Andrew Do was the fox in the hen house personified, raiding millions in federal pandemic relief funds and orchestrating the money intended to feed elderly and ailing residents to instead fill the pockets of insiders, himself and his loved ones all while portraying a public persona of a hometown hero guiding his constituents through the uncertainty and fear of a global pandemic,” said Orange County District Attorney Todd Spitzer. “No one is above the law in Orange County and these charges should serve as a powerful warning to elected officials everywhere that actions have consequences and justice will be swift and it will be decisive.”  

    “Elected officials have a responsibility to implement programs and policy that will benefit all the people they serve.  Their role is not to squander money, solicit bribes, or to steer funds to organizations or persons, wherein a coordinated effort allows those funds to make their way to family members or friends,” said Akil Davis, the Assistant Director in Charge of the FBI’s Los Angeles Field Office. “Today’s plea is another exclamation point to the FBI’s commitment to ensuring that all local, state, or federal elected and appointed public officials perform their duties with honesty, integrity, and commitment to all the constituents they serve.”

    Shortly after receiving the COVID-related public funds from the county government – funds that were intended to provide meals to the elderly – VAS from April 2021 to February 2024 paid a business identified in court documents as “Company #1” $100,000 or more per month, which totaled approximately $3,804,000. In September 2021, VAS increased its payments to Company #1 from $100,000 to $108,000 per month. Company #1 then began paying Rhiannon Do – Do’s daughter – $8,000 per month, totaling by February 2024 approximately $224,000.

    In his plea agreement, Do admitted that in addition to the $8,000 monthly payments that Company #1 had made to Do’s daughter, in July 2023, Company #1 also transferred a total of $381,500 from the funds it had received from VAS to an escrow company. In July 2023, Do’s daughter used the escrow account funds to purchase a home, in her name, in Tustin for $1,035,000. As part of that transaction, a mortgage for more than $600,000 was obtained by a loan application that contained false information and with fabricated documents. In her related diversion agreement attached as an exhibit to Do’s plea agreement, Do’s daughter admitted her conduct was criminal and violated federal and state law.

    Do also admitted that the $381,500 from Company #1 that his daughter had used to purchase the Tustin house in 2023 was a disguised bribe to him. He also admitted that an additional $100,000 in payments sent to his other daughter, including three $25,000 checks from Company #2 – an air conditioning company that had been paid by VAS – also were bribes to him.

    Some of the bribe funds that had been funneled to his daughters were spent for his direct benefit. For example, during 2022, a total of $14,849 of funds that had been funneled to Do’s daughters was used to make property tax payments for properties in Orange County owned by Do and his wife. Approximately $15,000 was used to pay for one of Do’s credit card bills.

    Do knew that VAS was not providing all the meals for which the county had paid VAS. Instead, much of the funds were used for the benefit of insiders, including to buy real estate in the name of both Do’s daughter and Company #1, bribe payments to both of Do’s daughters, payments to other conspirators, payments to other companies affiliated with VAS’s listed officers, and through hundreds of thousands of dollars in cash withdrawals.

    “Mr. Do had a duty to act in the best interest of the citizens of Orange County. He neglected that duty and misused the financial system to enrich himself,” said Special Agent in Charge Ryan Korner with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. Office of Inspector General. “Public corruption degrades the public’s confidence in our political system, and FDIC OIG is proud to work alongside our law enforcement partners to identify and hold accountable individuals who abuse public service for private gain.”

    “Andrew Do was entrusted to ensure taxpayer dollars were used responsibly and for the purposes intended,” said Special Agent in Charge Tyler Hatcher, IRS Criminal Investigation, Los Angeles Field Office. “Instead, when his constituents depended on COVID relief programs, Mr. Do exploited his position on the Orange County Board of Supervisors not only to influence channeling of funds to the Viet America Society, but also to accept bribes that were used to purchase a home, pay property taxes, and even to pay fictitious incomes to family members. Combating public corruption is one of the most important roles federal law enforcement agencies play in our local communities, and we are proud to be a partner during this investigation.” 

    “Today’s actions shows that this elected official used his position of trust for personal gain. He didn’t think he would get caught. He was wrong,” said Adam Shanedling, Special Agent in Charge of the U.S. Department of Education Office of Inspector General’s Western Regional Office. “The OIG is proud to have been a part of the task force that investigated this matter and we’ll continue to work with our law enforcement partners to help safeguard the integrity of federal funds.” 

    The plea agreement requires Do to forfeit any assets connected to the bribery scheme, including the Tustin property his daughter purchased in 2023. As part of his daughter’s related diversion agreement, she also agreed to forfeit the Tustin property. The plea agreement requires Do to pay full restitution by paying back the bribe money he and his daughters received, which he has agreed to pay in full before he is sentenced. In August 2022, the government seized more than $2.4 million from VAS’s and Company #1’s bank accounts.

    In a related agreement with the Orange County District Attorney’s Office (OCDA), attached as an exhibit to Do’s plea agreement, Do has agreed to immediately resign from the Orange County Board of Supervisors and to forfeit any pension credit for the time where he participated in the bribery conspiracy.

    Once Do enters his guilty plea, he will face a statutory maximum sentence of five years in federal prison.

    The FBI; the Orange County District Attorney’s Office Bureau of Investigation; the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. Office of the Inspector General; IRS Criminal Investigation; and the United States Department of Education Office of the Inspector General investigated this matter.

    This matter is being jointly prosecuted by the United States Attorney’s Office and OCDA. The prosecution is being led by Assistant United States Attorneys Charles E. Pell, Bradley E. Marrett, and Tara Vavere of the United States Attorney’s Office and Senior Deputy District Attorney Avery T. Harrison and Deputy District Attorneys Anthony J. Schlehner and L.J. Berger of the OCDA.  

    Any member of the public who has information related to this or any other public corruption matter in Orange County is encouraged to send information to the FBI’s email tip line at https://tips.fbi.gov and/or to contact the FBI’s Los Angeles Field Office at (310) 477-6565.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Security: U.S. Attorney Adair F. Boroughs Appoints District Election Officer

    Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) State Crime Alerts (c)

    COLUMBIA, S.C. — United States Attorney Adair Ford Boroughs announced today that Assistant United States Attorney (AUSA) John Potterfield will lead the efforts of her office in connection with the Justice Department’s nationwide Election Day Program for the upcoming Nov. 5 general election. AUSA Potterfield has been appointed to serve as the District Election Officer (DEO) for the District of South Carolina, and in that capacity is responsible for overseeing the district’s handling of election day complaints of voting rights concerns, threats of violence to election officials or staff, and election fraud, in consultation with Justice Department Headquarters in Washington.

    United States Attorney Boroughs said, “Every citizen must be able to vote without interference or discrimination and to have that vote counted in a fair and free election. Similarly, election officials and staff must be able to serve without being subject to unlawful threats of violence. The Department of Justice will always work tirelessly to protect the integrity of the election process.”

    The Department of Justice has an important role in deterring and combatting discrimination and intimidation at the polls, threats of violence directed at election officials and poll workers, and election fraud. The Department will address these violations wherever they occur. The Department’s longstanding Election Day Program furthers these goals and also seeks to ensure public confidence in the electoral process by providing local points of contact within the Department for the public to report possible federal election law violations.

    Federal law protects against such crimes as threatening violence against election officials or staff, intimidating or bribing voters, buying and selling votes, impersonating voters, altering vote tallies, stuffing ballot boxes, and marking ballots for voters against their wishes or without their input.  It also contains special protections for the rights of voters, and provides that they can vote free from interference, including intimidation, and other acts designed to prevent or discourage people from voting or voting for the candidate of their choice.  The Voting Rights Act protects the right of voters to mark their own ballot or to be assisted by a person of their choice (where voters need assistance because of disability or inability to read or write in English).   

    United States Attorney Boroughs stated that: “The franchise is the cornerstone of American democracy.  We all must ensure that those who are entitled to the franchise can exercise it if they choose, and that those who seek to corrupt it are brought to justice. In order to respond to complaints of voting rights concerns and election fraud during the upcoming election, and to ensure that such complaints are directed to the appropriate authorities, AUSA/DEO Potterfield will be on duty in this district while the polls are open.  He can be reached by the public at the following telephone numbers: 803-919-3092.”

    In addition, the FBI will have special agents available in each field office and resident agency throughout the country to receive allegations of election fraud and other election abuses on election day. The FBI Columbia field office can be reached by the public at 803-551-4200.

    Complaints about possible violations of the federal voting rights laws can be made directly to the Civil Rights Division in Washington, D.C. by complaint form at https://civilrights.justice.gov/ or by phone at 800-253-3931.

    United States Attorney Boroughs said, “Ensuring free and fair elections depends in large part on the assistance of the American electorate.  It is important that those who have specific information about voting rights concerns or election fraud make that information available to the Department of Justice.”

    Please note, however, in the case of a crime of violence or intimidation, please call 911 immediately and before contacting federal authorities. State and 

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Security: ALDI Executive and Southern Illinois Contractor Sentenced for Rigging Construction Project Bids, Ordered to Pay More Than $2.8 Million

    Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) State Crime Alerts (b)

    Ahead of the Threat Podcast: Episode Zero

    Welcome to Ahead of the Threat, the FBI’s new podcast miniseries that brings together an FBI cyber executive and a private sector chief information security officer. Join Bryan Vorndran, assistant director of the FBI’s Cyber Division, and Jamil Farshchi, a strategic engagement advisor for the FBI who also works as an executive vice president and CISO of Equifax, as they discuss emerging cyber threats and the enduring importance of cybersecurity fundamentals. Featuring distinguished guests from the business world and government, Ahead of the Threat will confront some of the biggest questions in cyber: How will emerging technology impact corporate America? How can corporate boards be structured for cyber resilience? What does the FBI think about generative artificial intelligence? Listen to new episodes biweekly and stay Ahead of the Threat.

    Charity and Disaster Fraud

    Charity fraud scams can come in many forms: emails, social media posts, crowdfunding platforms, cold calls, etc. They are especially common after high-profile disasters. Always use caution and do your research when you’re looking to donate to charitable causes.

    RYAN JAMES WEDDING

    Conspiracy to Distribute and Possess with Intent to Distribute Controlled Substances; Conspiracy to Export Cocaine; Continuing Criminal Enterprise; Murder in Connection with a Continuing Criminal Enterprise and Drug Crime; Attempt to Commit…

    Capitol Violence

    The FBI is seeking to identify individuals involved in the violent activities that occurred at the U.S. Capitol and surrounding areas on January 6, 2021. View photos and related information here. If you have any information to provide, visit tips.fbi.gov or call 1-800-CALL-FBI.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Security: United States Attorney Sayler Fleming Announces District Election Officers Responsible for Handling Election Day Complaints

    Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) State Crime News

    ST. LOUIS – United States Attorney Sayler A. Fleming announced today that Assistant United States Attorneys (AUSA) Hal Goldsmith and Jennifer Roy will lead the efforts of her office in connection with the Justice Department’s nationwide Election Day Program for the Nov. 5, 2024, general election.  AUSAs Goldsmith and Roy have been appointed to serve as the District Election Officers (DEO) for the Eastern District of Missouri, and are responsible for overseeing the district’s handling of election day complaints of voting rights concerns, threats of violence to election officials or staff, and election fraud, in consultation with Justice Department Headquarters in Washington.

    United States Attorney Fleming said, “Every citizen must be able to vote without interference or discrimination and to have that vote counted in a fair and free election.  Similarly, election officials and staff must be able to serve without being subject to unlawful threats of violence.  The Department of Justice will always work tirelessly to protect the integrity of the election process.”

    The Department of Justice has an important role in deterring and combatting discrimination and intimidation at the polls, threats of violence directed at election officials and poll workers, and election fraud.  The Department will address these violations wherever they occur.  The Department’s longstanding Election Day Program furthers these goals and also seeks to ensure public confidence in the electoral process by providing local points of contact within the Department for the public to report possible federal election law violations.

    Federal law protects against such crimes as threatening violence against election officials or staff, intimidating or bribing voters, buying and selling votes, impersonating voters, altering vote tallies, stuffing ballot boxes, and marking ballots for voters against their wishes or without their input.  It also contains special protections for the rights of voters, and provides that they can vote free from interference, including intimidation, and other acts designed to prevent or discourage people from voting or voting for the candidate of their choice.  The Voting Rights Act protects the right of voters to mark their own ballot or to be assisted by a person of their choice (where voters need assistance because of disability or inability to read or write in English).  

    United States Attorney Fleming said, “The franchise is the cornerstone of American democracy.  We all must ensure that those who are entitled to the franchise can exercise it if they choose, and that those who seek to corrupt it are brought to justice.  In order to respond to complaints of voting rights concerns and election fraud during the upcoming election, and to ensure that such complaints are directed to the appropriate authorities, DEOs Goldsmith and Roy will be on duty in this District while the polls are open.  They can be reached by the public at 314-539-7733.”

    In addition, the FBI will have special agents available in each field office and resident agency throughout the country to receive allegations of election fraud and other election abuses on election day.  You can reach the FBI online at tips.fbi.gov or by dialing 1-800-CALL-FBI (1-800-225-5324).

    Complaints about possible violations of the federal voting rights laws can be made directly to the Civil Rights Division in Washington, DC by complaint form at https://civilrights.justice.gov/ or by phone at 800-253-3931.

    United States Attorney Fleming said, “Ensuring free and fair elections depends in large part on the assistance of the American electorate.  It is important that those who have specific information about voting rights concerns or election fraud make that information available to the Department of Justice.”

    Please note, however, in the case of a crime of violence or intimidation, please call 911 immediately and before contacting federal authorities.  State and local police have primary jurisdiction over polling places, and almost always have faster reaction capacity in an emergency.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Security: U.S. Attorney’s Office Announces Election Day Program for 2024 General Election

    Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) State Crime News

    ALBUQUERQUE – United States Attorney Alexander M.M. Uballez announced today that Assistant United States Attorneys (AUSAs) Jeremy Peña and Sean Sullivan will lead the efforts of his Office in connection with the Justice Department’s nationwide Election Day Program for the upcoming November 5, 2024, general election. AUSAs Peña and Sullivan have been appointed to serve as the District Election Officers for the District of New Mexico, and in that capacity are responsible for overseeing the District’s handling of election day complaints of voting rights concerns, threats of violence to election officials or staff, and election fraud, in consultation with Justice Department Headquarters in Washington.

    “Our vote is our voice. That is why the Department of Justice will ensure every citizen can vote without interference or discrimination and have that vote counted in a fair and free election,” said U.S. Attorney Uballez. “Similarly, elections do not run themselves. We will protect our election officials and staff from interference and unlawful threats of violence. The Department will ensure that those who are entitled to the franchise can exercise it, and that those who seek to corrupt it are brought to justice.”

    The Department of Justice has an important role in deterring and combatting discrimination and intimidation at the polls, threats of violence directed at election officials and poll workers, and election fraud. The Department will address these violations wherever they occur. The Department’s longstanding Election Day Program furthers these goals and also seeks to ensure public confidence in the electoral process by providing local points of contact within the Department for the public to report possible federal election law violations.

    Federal law protects against such crimes as threatening violence against election officials or staff, intimidating or bribing voters, buying and selling votes, impersonating voters, altering vote tallies, stuffing ballot boxes, and marking ballots for voters against their wishes or without their input. It also contains special protections for the rights of voters, and provides that they can vote free from interference, including intimidation, and other acts designed to prevent or discourage people from voting or voting for the candidate of their choice. The Voting Rights Act protects the right of voters to mark their own ballot or to be assisted by a person of their choice (where voters need assistance because of disability or inability to read or write in English). 

    “The vote is the cornerstone of American democracy,” continued U.S. Attorney Uballez. “And ensuring free and fair elections depends on you. If you have specific information about voting rights concerns or election fraud, call us.”

    Members of the public can reach AUSA Peña at (505) 269-2038 and AUSA Sullivan at (505) 350-3153 any time the polls are open in New Mexico.

    In addition, the FBI will have special agents available in each field office and resident agency throughout the country to receive allegations of election fraud and other election abuses on election day. The FBI can be reached by the public at 1-800-CALL-FBI or tips.fbi.gov.

    Finally, complaints about possible violations of the federal voting rights laws can be made directly to the Civil Rights Division in Washington, DC by complaint form at https://civilrights.justice.gov/ or by phone at 800-253-3931.

    Please note, however, in the case of a crime of violence or intimidation, please call 911 immediately and before contacting federal authorities. State and local police have primary jurisdiction over polling places, and almost always have faster reaction capacity in an emergency.

    # # #

    MIL Security OSI