Category: Fisheries

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Nobody should be destitute in a modern Scotland

    Source: Scottish Greens

    Scotland has the keys to ending destitution – it is time our government unlocked the doors.

    The Scottish Government must do more to end destitution for people living under the thumb of the hostile environment, says Scottish Greens MSP Maggie Chapman.
     
    The Green MSP will use a Member’s Business Debate today to call on the Scottish Government to go further in its work to end destitution.
     
    Ms Chapman will call for commitments to five tangible actions to end destitution, including: widening access to universal services and benefits, expanding support for Fair Way Scotland – a partnership that provides advice and accommodation for people with restricted or uncertain eligibility to public funds, creating a new Scottish crisis or hardship grant, and increasing funding for housing, immigration and asylum legal aid.
     
    Ms Chapman said:

    “Right now in Scotland, thousands of people who live in dire conditions are shut out of services and left struggling. Without support, they regularly go cold and hungry. Many are forced into precarious work and dangerous situations to make ends meet, often ending up homelessness.
     
    “We cannot undo all of the damage being done by Westminster, but we have the power to alleviate some of these challenges and change these lives for the better. Unfortunately the Scottish Government isn’t doing nearly enough.
     
    “If we don’t intervene, the cycle of destitution, suffering and exploitation will simply continue.”

    No Recourse to Public Funds is a condition attached to work, family and study visas which restricts access to a lot of aspects of social security, including Universal Credit and child benefit and a range of other support like homelessness assistance.
     
    Ms Chapman added:

    “The No Recourse to Public Funds policy is yet another arm of the UK government’s hostile and racist immigration system. We already know how to mitigate the cruelty of this policy – so we cannot continue to justify blocking people’s access to crucial services in times of desperate need.
     
    “We have universal human rights obligations to help our fellow humans, irrespective of immigration status. Our governments must go further to support those who risk fleeing from one hostile environment to simply enter another, cloaked as a sanctuary.
     
    “Tragically, people in Scotland are dying from destitution as the doors remain closed to those in need. Our government can, and must, widen access to universal services to include people who are stranded by the widest inequality and cut off by the deepest destitution.”

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI Russia: “Studying at the University of Bologna is very different from how we study at the HSE”

    Translartion. Region: Russians Fedetion –

    Source: State University Higher School of Economics – State University Higher School of Economics –

    Alina Pakhomova

    Photo from personal archive

    Alina Pakhomova, 4th year student of the educational program “Computer Science and Engineering» MIEM HSE, studied for six months at the oldest university in Europe — the University of Bologna. She went to Italy under the academic mobility program, and upon returning to Moscow, she told about her impressions of life and study in another country, leisure, new friends and, of course, the famous Italian cuisine.

    University of Bologna and the educational system

    The University of Bologna is considered the oldest university in the Western world, where Dante Alighieri, Francesco Petrarca, Nicolaus Copernicus, and Umberto Eco studied. In addition, it is one of the top universities in Italy. Therefore, when I saw that Bologna was on the list of universities to which HSE had the opportunity to apply, there was no doubt: I applied only there. Besides, the programs at other universities, to be honest, were not very suitable.

    When you go on mobility, you replace your courses with those at the university where you will study, regardless of the field. I am in my 4th year of bachelor’s degree, and it turned out that I studied on master’s courses, since they were the best fit for replacement. In addition, there are more master’s programs in English than bachelor’s, which means there is more choice.

    The semester lasts from September to February. Exams were, as in HSE, in autumn and winter, but, unfortunately, in winter they are there both before and after the New Year. After the free winter holidays at HSE, it was difficult to sit and chat during the winter holidays in Italy…

    Lectures and practical classes

    Studying at the University of Bologna is very different from how we study at the HSE. Classes last three hours, sometimes two. Frankly, you lose focus after the usual hour and a half. In Italy, it is important to sit down after a class and reread the lectures, delve into the material and take notes, otherwise you simply won’t remember anything. At the HSE, seminars are very helpful in consolidating the material, which the University of Bologna doesn’t have.

    There are laboratory works, but, unlike HSE, where you most often do the work at home, and in the practical class you only ask questions or already defend the work, in Bologna they are done by students right in the practical classes and only finished at home, which happens rarely, only if you did not have time.

    Probably my favorite course is Artificial Intelligence in Industry, because it was a course where you delve into how everything works in real life, and lectures were often given by invited lecturers from foreign companies. By the way, in Bologna, another common practice in IT areas is a project as an exam. That is, you just pass one big project, and the grade for it is your final grade for the course.

    Where to live in Bologna

    Housing is hard here. The university does not provide dormitories: they are there, but it is almost impossible to get them. If you do not have 1000 euros for a room in a student co-living, where exchange students from other European countries (Erasmus students) usually live, then welcome to the “Hunger Games”. Here you will not choose an apartment, but the landlord (landlord) will choose the one he likes best from the mass of students who want to rent housing.

    Then you need to look for either a double (bed in a double room) or a single (bed in a single room). The prices are 350 and 500 euros respectively. Another option is to join someone and rent the entire apartment.

    Tip 1: try to look for housing through acquaintances or students who were on mobility before you, and do it in advance. Also look through chats, as students often post the housing they lived in and find a replacement.

    Tip 2: Don’t be upset if you can’t find anything in advance. You can rent temporary accommodation and then continue searching in Bologna itself once you’ve arrived there.

    What did you like most about Italy?

    Here it is easy to arrange a mini-vacation and travel to another city or country. For example, I flew for the weekend to France, Denmark and other European countries, because the tickets cost 15-20 euros (1500-2000 rubles) one way. And the journey takes very little time.

    Speaking about Italy itself, it really helped me slow down. In Moscow, you are constantly in some kind of hustle and bustle, constantly going somewhere on the metro, wasting a lot of time on it. In Bologna, on foot, 20 minutes — and you are already there. Here, it is much easier to meet for a short walk or a get-together in a cafe, invite someone for a coffee before work or for an Aperol after classes.

    How the vision of the future profession has changed

    Before Italy, I thought I had decided on the direction I wanted to develop in. My study and work experience combines several areas: IT, marketing, and events. All this makes me an excellent devrel. But after studying abroad, I realized that I don’t want to stop there. I plan to continue my education in a master’s degree. Now I am most interested in product management in the field of high technologies.

    Communication and extracurricular student life

    People and networking were one of the main goals of my trip. There were 7 of us from HSE who went on mobility, and we didn’t know each other before Italy. But the circumstance of finding ourselves alone in another country and trying to figure out a lot of new rules and bureaucratic requirements really brought us together. In Moscow, we would most likely never have crossed paths, and even if we had, we would hardly have become friends: we are all very different. But in another country, everything is different, the very circumstances of life brought us closer. And communication with completely different people, unlike your usual environment in Moscow, changes you a lot.

    In Europe, there is an organization called ESN (Erasmus Student Network). Their branches are usually in every student city. Either students or graduates work there. They organize various meetings and events for dating, trips and travel with big discounts. They also have partners, and you can get discounts in establishments or companies with an ESN member card (it costs 10 euros). For example, one of the partners is a low-cost airline that provides 10% discounts and free luggage space with an ESN card.

    I wouldn’t say that there is some kind of super-organization of all events, but there are simply a lot of them. The events are mainly aimed at introducing people, uniting them by interests and providing an opportunity to have a good time together. For example, one of the events is The Babel Nights: people gather in different audiences and communicate in a certain language. English, Italian, Spanish, French, German – you can choose whichever is closer to you and go to the right audience. You can also go to the theater together (cheaper with ESN) and to exhibitions. In general, everyone will find something to their liking.

    There are other student clubs. For example, some guys just organized a hiking chat and every Saturday they go somewhere on a short day hike. When I left, they decided to expand and create sub-chats for basketball and volleyball fans.

    It’s easy to meet anyone here, but the common problem is that communication is very superficial. To be honest, sometimes you get tired of the huge amount of small talk.

    Local cuisine and favourite dishes

    Food in Italy is a separate topic. What is interesting here is not so much what food is the most delicious, but how Italians treat their food and the order of eating. Take a cappuccino after 12, order a pizza for two, drink autumn special coffee from Starbucks with pumpkin syrup – get ready for deportation, as we often joked when doing something like this. Italians are very sensitive to their gastronomic culture and really don’t like it when someone doesn’t follow the rules.

    My favorite dishes are: croissant with pistachio, cappuccino and lasagne. I won’t mention pizza and pasta because I feel sick from eating so much of them. I don’t understand how Italians can eat pasta every day. Once we asked a friend: “Are there days when you don’t eat pasta for lunch?” His answer perfectly describes the Italian culture: “Of course, but then I’ll definitely have it for dinner.”

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Sir Martyn Oliver’s speech to Parentkind

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Speech

    Sir Martyn Oliver’s speech to Parentkind

    Sir Martyn Oliver, Ofsted’s Chief Inspector, spoke to Parentkind on the role of parents in education.

    Thank you, thank you to Jason [Elsom, CEO, Parentkind] to everyone whether you’re in the room or online. It’s wonderful to be here, I want to thank Parentkind for the opportunity, and for all of the work they do. It’s always fantastic to speak directly to parents and carers. It’s so important that you are involved in the dialogue around education. That your voices, and the voices of your children are heard.

    I know from all my time as a teacher, a head, a multi-academy trust leader and now as His Majesty’s Chief Inspector at Ofsted, that education works best when children, families and schools all work together.

    Education is a team sport, and you need every member of the team to be pulling in the same direction.

    The power of education

    I saw this in my time as an art teacher, if you can believe it. I loved my job. I loved being able to see the impact that education can have on an individual child. You do all that you can to pass on knowledge and skills, but you also want to light a fire in children so they enjoy and keep learning throughout their lives. Teachers do this remarkable work every single day. But it’s in these roles that you also see the limitations of what can be achieved if something in the child’s home life isn’t working.

    My biggest fear as a headteacher wasn’t Ofsted nor was it the responsibility of the actual job itself, it was the fear that there may be or there will be a child in one of my schools whose needs were not being met and that they wouldn’t go on to have the remarkable impact on society that they could have had: a child not able to attend PE enrichment and misses out on a sport they may have excelled at and gone to represent the country in, or a child not taking the right exam option and not going to make a break-through discovery in that field. These are the real-world and long-lasting consequences to what happens in education.

    I saw it again when I became a head of sixth form. It was a wonderful role, helping to prepare young people for the world. But again, it only worked if the child and their family are also active participants in education and that progression.

    In my first school, I stayed and taught art for 7 years and I was really fortunate enough to be given a few classes who I could see through from Year 7 all the way through to taking the their GCSEs and the first A-level class in that school when they got to Year 12. Seeing one generation through the school from start to finish and working with both the children and their parents as they flourished at GCSE and then A-level art before going on to university and having really successful careers is incredibly powerful, and satisfying as a career. The open and honest relationship with parents was critical each and every step of the way.

    And I saw it as a headteacher. In that role, you’re working not just for the community within the school gates, but also the community outside those gates. You need to make sure that the children in the school are getting all the education and the opportunities that they can.

    But you also need to be heavily invested in what happens before they arrive and when they leave school at the end of the day. In some cases, you need to understand why they are not coming in the first place. You need to support the aspirations of children and also the aspirations of their parents and carers. And you need to make sure everyone gets to work together to support the development of every child.

    Beyond the individual

    Of course, we want all parents to be involved in their children’s learning. To read to them, and to read with them. To support them with homework. To challenge and encourage them. I’m sure all of you involved in Parentkind exemplify this.

    But what’s even more encouraging is when parents get involved in the life of the school itself. When they begin to help not only their child’s learning, but the learning of all children at that school, including those who may not have strong parental advocacy.

    We know that schools with strong parent engagement thrive and succeed. As Parentkind regularly point out, it has been linked to improvements in attendance, behaviour, and academic achievement.

    And PTAs are a fantastic way to do that, and I know many of you, here and online, are involved in that way. The same can be said for parent governors, again I know many of you have taken that route.

    I was lucky enough to work with some fantastic PTAs and governors – in my first year of teaching I joined my school’s PTA and by the second year, incredibly, I chaired the group! You can imagine the impact it had on me as a young teacher chairing a group which consisted of the headteacher and chair of governors. Yet again though, I saw the power of parents and the school working together – this time not for the benefit of any one child, but of all children in that community.

    But whether or not you join the PTA or the governing board, parents should understand what schools are doing and why they take the decisions they take. This requires active engagement from the parent, and active communication from the school. In loco parentis only works if the parents and teachers trust each other. It’s a two-way street.

    When it’s done right, when parents and carers really buy in to the school and its ethos, then they become part of a united community, working together.

    When the relationship breaks

    But of course, we have also heard a lot recently about what can happen when this relationship and community is not there. When there is breakdown of trust between parents and schools. Sometimes this results in friction, or even outright hostility between parents and school leaders.

    A survey of teachers called Teacher Tapp reported recently that over 40% of teachers and school leaders reported seeing negative online comments from parents about staff or their school since September.

    In another Teacher Tapp survey at the end of the last school year, 9% of teachers said they had been the subject of an allegation from a parent. Obviously, some of these are legitimate grievances, and parents should be able to raise concerns. But nearly 1 in 10 of teachers feels high to me.

    Other teacher representatives talk about abuse of teachers becoming more of a problem.

    This sort of relationship breakdown can be hard to recover from. Trust is not built overnight, and once it’s lost it can take months or even years to rebuild. But the only way to tackle that is more openness and transparency.

    We want to encourage parental engagement. Engagement in the right way, the way so many of you will be doing it.

    We know how social media has come to influence the dynamics of school communities – positively and negatively. It’s such a powerful tool, and it can be an amazing way to bring people together. But it can also hand a microphone to the pub bore, a megaphone to the bully and help the rabble rouser find his or her rabble without leaving their armchair.

    The world seems to be getting more antagonistic and adversarial. So, you can understand why a school leader might be wary of engaging with parents. But I always found that the way to defuse tensions, tackle rumours and build common purpose with parents is more communication, not less. More openness, not less. And more information sharing, not less. So, I say: join the PTA, don’t join the pile on!

    Because I know from my experience, it will be welcomed. And Parentkind’s survey backs this up too. You found that 85% of teachers agree that parental engagement in school life has benefits and 75% agree that it improves outcomes for young people.

    So I want Ofsted to play its part in better communication.

    Our new report cards

    I hope that our proposals for new report cards, to be introduced from November, will prove a game-changer.

    They are based on what we heard from parents in the Big Listen. You told us that you wanted a broad evaluative approach with clear reporting on what your child’s school or nursery or college is doing well and what it needs to work on.

    That’s exactly what we think we have designed. A report card that provides more detailed and nuanced information for you.

    Now I know some of you were happy with the old system. After all, the one-word overall judgement was praised for its simplicity. But that simplicity also frustrated many parents who wanted more detailed information – more tailored to the needs of their children.

    One-word judgements could also have unintended consequences. Where parents had a choice in schools – in cities and larger towns – the one-word judgement could lead to schools being over or under subscribed. This is frustrating for parents and potentially damaging for schools who could find their local reputation ‘locked’ for years, with a knock-on effect on everything from recruitment and retention of teachers, to local house prices.

    The changes we’re proposing will do things differently. We will report on a much wider range of areas. Things that matter, I hope, to you. Things like behaviour, achievement, attendance, teaching and the curriculum, leadership and governance, and inclusion – really looking in detail at how schools make sure their pupils all have a sense of belonging, especially those who are disadvantaged, vulnerable, or have special educational needs. For each area, you will be able to see a clear grade, and a description of what we found when we inspected the school.

    Report cards will help give a more balanced picture of schools. Because the best schools aren’t perfect and have areas where they could do better, and the schools which might be seen as ‘weaker’ will have aspects of their work that they do really well. In that way a school’s report card will be much closer to a child’s school report. Going back to my art teacher days, the one-word grade paints a monochrome picture of a school; and now we want to paint it in colour.

    Wouldn’t it be great if more balanced reporting, acknowledging both strengths and weaknesses, put paid to the idea that a school is seen as a 100% ‘success’ or a 100% ‘failure’. And instead parents had the information they needed to choose schools based on the specific things they thought were most important to their children.

    Somewhere with great standards of behaviour. Somewhere with exceptional support for children with special educational needs or disabilities. Somewhere which delivers great outcomes and achievements. Somewhere that really prioritises the wellbeing and personal development of its pupils. Parents and carers will be able to see how local schools perform on these. That might change the way schools are seen by their communities and change established patterns of school applications.

    But I know for many of you – particularly if you live outside of cities – there really isn’t much choice between schools. I still think more detailed information will really help you. You’ll be able to see what’s working well and what needs attention at your local school. And I believe this level of information will help inform a better, more constructive conversation between school leaders and their communities – to address some of those tensions I spoke about a few minutes ago.

    And we want to do more to encourage this constructive dialogue. As I said, we know that an engaged community leads to a better school. So, our proposals for inspecting the leadership and governance of a school talk explicitly about the need for leaders to ‘engage with and work effectively with parents and carers and the local community to support pupils’ achievement and well-being.’ – that’s a direct quote from our school inspection toolkit. I know that’s something that Parentkind has welcomed.

    Driving higher standards

    Above all, we hope this approach will drive ever higher standards for children. It will give schools an independent and expert assessment of what they’re doing well and where they could improve. It will validate, assure, and celebrate their hard work, and shine a light on how they can do even better.

    And it will help you, as parents, meaningfully engage with the school on the issues that need attention. Sometimes, it may validate your concerns, other times it may reassure you that an individual experience is not the norm.

    It will also help the government better target support where it is needed. By reporting specifically on topics like attendance or behaviour, we can help government decide when and where to provide expert assistance to those who need it most. And we also want to help schools – as well as nurseries and further education colleges – to see which of their peers are really blazing a trail, through our new exemplary grade. So, we will highlight some of the best national examples of where schools are doing something truly exceptional.

    Initial support from parents

    Of course, what I’ve set out today are our proposals, they are not set in stone. Our consultation on a new way of inspecting is open until 28th April and it’s on our website – ‘gov.uk/Ofsted’. Please, please read the proposals and give us every one of your views.

    I’m sure there are things that could be better. Things we could refine. But we are encouraged that parents seem to support the broad approach that we have set out.

    We recently commissioned independent research from YouGov. They polled parents on our proposed report cards and have just shared the results with us.

    Almost 7 out of 10 of the parents surveyed said they prefer the new-look report cards to our current inspection reports. Just 15% said they preferred the old system.

    And nearly 9 out of 10 parents said the report cards are easy to understand. 84% thought that the colour-coding we propose to use on the reports is helpful.

    And it’s worth adding that two thirds of parents said they support Ofsted continuing to grade schools. That is important, as grading does come in for some criticism – but parents are consistent: they told us in the Big Listen they wanted it and they’ve told us again in this new survey.

    It’s great to see this level of support. But obviously, we need a system that works for everyone. It needs to work for you as parents and, most importantly, it needs to work for children. But it also needs to work for those working in schools and nurseries and colleges.

    Sometimes that’s a balancing act. But I do not see the two as in opposition. After all, you and your children want happy teachers. You don’t want to see high turnover any more than leaders do. And you want schools to be able to focus on what really matters and provide the best possible education.

    So, we’ve tried to design a system that does just that. That drives higher standards for children, that improves reporting for you and enables engagement for you, and that reduces pressure on everyone working in education.

    Conclusion

    So, it’s really important that we capture parents’ opinions in the consultation. So, thank you for all of you who have already taken part – and thank you in advance if you plan to do so.

    And I’d like to end by recognising the incredible work so many of you do as PTA members, or parent governors. Thank you for supporting schools, for contributing to your communities, and for improving the education prospects not just of your own children, but of all the children in your neighbourhoods. So thank you for the work you do, it’s so important. It’s been a pleasure talking to you. Thank you.

    Updates to this page

    Published 26 March 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI Global: Why your medical condition might be named after a food

    Source: The Conversation – UK – By Adam Taylor, Professor of Anatomy, Lancaster University

    “Strawberry nose” can refer to a skin disorder called rhinophyma or large pores or blackheads on the nose Roman Samborskyi/Shutterstock

    From watermelon stomach to chocolate cysts, you might wonder why doctors decided to name some ailments after foods – after all, it’s enough to put you off your dinner.

    When early physicians and surgeons were studying the body to understand normal function or disease, they lacked modern microscopic and molecular imaging and diagnostic techniques. Instead, they had to rely on basic observational skills and often used easily recognised descriptors to explain the appearance of organs and diseases.

    Food, then, became a convenient way to communicate the appearance of the body – in health and in sickness. This practice is known as eponymophilia and it continues today, particularly in pathology – the study of disease.

    There are lots of eponyms to describe the female reproductive system. Many healthcare workers describe healthy ovaries, for instance, as almond shape and size, while the shape of a typical uterus is often likened to an upside-down pear.

    Different shapes can be down to normal anatomical variation but can also be a sign of disease. Knowing these shapes and sizes allows for rapid identification during imaging assessments or medical examinations.

    Following childbirth and the cutting of the umbilical cord, the mother must deliver the afterbirth. According to 16th century anatomist, Matteo Realdo Colombo, the afterbirth looked like a “flat-cake”, and so he named it “placenta”, which comes from the Latin word for a type of cake.




    Read more:
    How a 16th century Italian anatomist came up with the word ‘placenta’: it reminded him of a cake


    Doctors examine the placenta carefully post-delivery to make sure none is left inside the mother – a condition known as retained placenta – which happens in 0.1-3% of births. Retained placenta can cause post-partum haemorrhage and and even the death of the mother, so checking the placenta looks like a “flat-cake” can save lives.

    While some eponyms, like the flat-cake placenta, seem straightforward, others can seem rather unkind. Take the common descriptions of Cushing’s syndrome for instance.

    People with Cushing’s often have a larger than average abdomen and lean legs, known as “lemon on matchstick” and can develop a “moon face” and a “buffalo hump”.

    Cushing’s disease is caused by long-term exposure to high levels of cortisol, a hormone the body makes to regulate its response to stress. It can develop naturally from tumours forming in the adrenal or pituitary glands, which produce cortisol.

    More commonly, however, it’s caused by some medicines, such as steroids – which contain a synthetic version of cortisol.

    Some eponyms can also function as euphemisms – making a serious, even threatening condition sound less worrying. Take “milky leg syndrome” or “milk leg”, for instance – deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in the iliac veins in the pelvis or the femoral veins at the top of your legs.

    The blockage prevents venous drainage – when veins drain deoxygenated blood and return it to the heart – from the legs, which causes painful, pale and swollen legs.

    Research suggests that 75% of cases of milk leg occur in the left leg and men are more likely to develop the condition than women. There are a number of risk factors, including previous vein blockage, obesity and pregnancy.

    If not treated promptly, the condition can progress to phlegmasia cerulea dolens – a rare but serious complication of DVT causing fluid build-up that prevents arteries from delivering blood into the tissues – which can lead to tissue death and venous gangrene. Sadly, once venous gangrene has set in, amputation and death are common outcomes.

    While this all sounds grim, spare a thought for those who suffer from “hot potato voice”, which describes the sound of someone who has an obstruction somewhere in the upper part of their airway. This blockage prevents the person from forming sounds properly and can be caused by an abscess in or around the tonsils, or a stone lodged in the throat.

    Before I go on, it’s only fair to warn you that if you’re eating or drinking or you haven’t got the stomach for more graphic descriptions, you might not want to read any further.

    Not for the faint-hearted

    Pea soup diarrhoea is an apt description of a deeply unpleasant infection: salmonella. Salmonella – or food poisoning – is an infection with salmonella bacteria that causes diarrhoea, high temperature and stomach pains. It can be transmitted from person to person through contaminated food or water or from touching infected animals, their faeces, or their environment.

    Thankfully, most healthy people recover fully by drinking plenty of fluids and resting. Younger or older people are at greater risk of more severe illness, as are immunocompromised people, and they may be prescribed antibiotics to help them recover from the infection.

    While diarrhoea can look like pea-soup, some STIs can look like cauliflower. Yes, sexually transmitted warts caused by the human papilloma virus can have a “cauliflower-like appearance”.

    They are typically seen on the external genitalia, around the anus and may be present internally too. Certain types of cancers, such as squamous cell carcinomas, also have a cauliflower-like appearance as they develop.

    The thick, white odourless discharge that can be a symptom of thrush is often likened to cottage cheese.

    The vagina usually self-cleans by producing a white or clear discharge. The white colour is most common at the beginning or end of the menstrual cycle; however, if the consistency becomes clumpy or curd-like, this is often a sign of infection.

    Most commonly, it’s a yeast infection but could also be a sexually transmitted disease, such as chlamydia. If there is a problem, this discharge is usually associated with other symptoms such as discomfort, pain, itching or an unpleasant smell.

    While some of these descriptions may seem unpleasant, they can be helpful to identify abnormalities and medical conditions. Food eponyms can help avoid confusion so doctors know what they’re looking for during examinations or surgery.

    Adam Taylor does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. Why your medical condition might be named after a food – https://theconversation.com/why-your-medical-condition-might-be-named-after-a-food-247543

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI Global: Snow White: this opportunity to empower Disney’s first princess falls short at every turn

    Source: The Conversation – UK – By Laura O’Flanagan, PhD Candidate, School of English, Dublin City University

    Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs was a wonder of animation and cinema when it was first released by Disney in 1937. Based on the 1812 German fairy tale by the Brothers Grimm, it tells the story of a princess whose wicked step mother is intimidated by her youthful beauty. Desperate to be the “fairest of them all” the evil queen tries to have Snow White killed. Evading death, she is forced into hiding with seven dwarves.

    It was Disney’s first animated feature-length film and a critical and commercial success. Snow White was also the first Disney princess.

    In the decades since, Disney’s pantheon of princesses has grown. Alongside newer princess, Snow White seems pretty antiquated and uninspiring. She is a passive, innocent character who doesn’t do very much but wait around for her prince with whom she travels into the sunset at the film’s conclusion. In contrast, Moana (2016) and Elsa from Frozen (2013) are strong and independent characters who develop into thoughtful and careful leaders by the end of their stories.

    So, in an age of live-action remakes of some of Disney’s most iconic films it seemed fitting to give the character who started it all an update for modern audiences. However, the production was mired in controversy before it was even released, raising questions about whether Snow White is a story that can ever really be retold in a more empowering way.

    Looking for something good? Cut through the noise with a carefully curated selection of the latest releases, live events and exhibitions, straight to your inbox every fortnight, on Fridays. Sign up here.


    Changing the story to move with the times is in keeping with traditions of oral folk tales. But, controversy has followed the film since it was announced. As a result, Disney scaled back their usual red carpet premieres and it has been critically panned upon release.

    To many, the prospect of an updated, less romantically inclined Snow White was unthinkable. Some online commenters dubbed a Snow White story where the princess is not dreaming of true love “woke”.

    There was also backlash against the choice of Rachel Zegler as Snow White because of her Colombian background. The live-action Snow White isn’t the first remake to be the source of such racism. The ire echoes the hatred which accompanied 2023’s The Little Mermaid, when black actress Halle Bailey was cast as Ariel.

    There were also those who had concerns about the story, particularly the titular seven dwarves. Actor Peter Dinklage, who has a form of dwarfism, has condemned the production’s use of CGI, rather than casting dwarf actors to play Snow White’s mining companions. The story’s representation of people with dwarfism, has led some to say that the story shouldn’t be retold altogether.




    Read more:
    Why the changing representation of dwarfism in Disney’s live action Snow White remake is so important


    However, there are some aspects of the story that could have provided interesting opportunities to explore modern issues.

    For instance, it could have thoughtfully explored female ageing through the character of the evil queen. It could also, perhaps, have commented on the politics of beauty and the pressure for consumers in their teens and twenties, who have started buying beauty products at younger ages than ever before.

    Like Frozen’s tale of sisters saving each other, it could have subverted the trope of the damsel in distress saved by her prince charming. Snow White could have been a strong heroine who can overcome evil on her own terms.

    The story could have revised mistakes of the past and depicted different body types and people of different sizes and statures. It could also have portrayed consensual kisses by updating the kiss Snow White receives while asleep, turning it into a moment she chooses to participate in.

    Unfortunately, the new Snow White does not achieve any of these, or really anything much at all. The result is a dull, pointless story with poorly rendered visuals, cheap-looking costumes and lacklustre musical numbers.

    Falling short

    The 1937 film was a technical marvel and remains one of Disney’s visual masterpieces. Snow White of 2025 looks like she is gallivanting through a theme park ride as she moves through the forest, bathed in permanent evening light among computer-generated woodland creatures in her garish costume.

    The miners are introduced as 274-year-old magical creatures. Their appearance is neither human nor magical creature, landing somewhere uncanny in between. This is the crux of the film’s entire problem. The opportunity to update Snow White fails on every level because it does not go far enough.

    The story largely remains intact, with some expansion in terms of backstory and some additional characters. The evil queen remains a one-dimensional villain obsessed with beauty.

    The script plays with the word “fair”, with it taking on a confused double-meaning in the story. To the queen “fair” is beautiful, in keeping with the 1937 film, but to Snow White, “fair” means just. This is an interesting idea but it becomes muddled as the film progresses, and loses its way.

    Snow White is portrayed with an expanded backstory and is certainly given more motivation than in the 1937 film. For instance, she wants to reinstate “fairness” in the kingdom, which has been under the tyrannical rule of the evil queen since Snow White’s father’s death. But as more characters are introduced to aid Snow White on her journey, these serve as distraction and buffer, preventing her from showing any real development or growth.

    Prince Charming has been replaced by Jonathan, a Robin Hood-style bandit who condescendingly explains to Snow White why she has “princess problems”. He ultimately saves her by giving her true love’s kiss when she is under the queen’s spell. The issue of consent still swirls around this scene and underscores the question: is this an update at all?

    In the end, the queen is ultimately defeated by collective action, compared with a lightning bolt like in 1937. This is a significant development and perhaps the clearest update in the film. In 2025, the defeat of a vain autocrat by collective action is an appealing thought. Perhaps the filmmakers could have leaned into this idea, allowed Snow White to truly become one of the people and a clear democracy could have been established. But, like every other of the film’s updates, it falls short and she remains an unelected autocrat – albeit “the fairest one of all”.

    Laura O’Flanagan does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. Snow White: this opportunity to empower Disney’s first princess falls short at every turn – https://theconversation.com/snow-white-this-opportunity-to-empower-disneys-first-princess-falls-short-at-every-turn-253064

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI Global: Politicians’ attacks on immigrants lack solid evidence: New data set the record straight

    Source: The Conversation – Canada – By Edward Koning, Associate professor, University of Guelph

    Immigration dominated recent election campaigns in countries that include the United Kingdom, France, Germany and the United States.

    The subject sparked particularly fierce debates over welfare. While some politicians called for more support for typically economically vulnerable immigrant populations, others argued that welfare systems are already too generous and accommodating to newcomers.

    Unfortunately, many debates on this subject lack solid evidence. A newly launched data set could change that. The data, which provides systematic information on immigrants’ access to social programs across different countries and different time periods, can help ground some of these discussions in empirical reality.

    The data set reveals key insights. One striking observation is that the countries where politicians most frequently complain that immigrants are treated too generously are among the most exclusionary from a comparative perspective.

    It also shows that although most welfare systems were moving towards greater inclusion up until the 2010s, since then social programs in many countries have become more inclusive in some respects but more exclusive in others.

    A new data set for 22 countries

    The data set, called the Immigrant Exclusion from Social Programs Index (IESPI), measures how much immigrants’ access to pensions, health care, unemployment benefits, housing benefits, social assistance and active labour market programs compares to that of native-born citizens.

    The index uses 32 indicators to measure factors like whether immigrants have to have resided in the country for a certain period of time, held a specific type of residence status, or met standards of successful integration before they can access social programs.

    The data covers the years 1990 to 2023 and includes information for 22 countries.

    Complaints about inclusion

    In the United States, President Donald Trump has voiced concerns about immigrants’ welfare access repeatedly, both during his first term and since taking office again this year.

    In last year’s British election, a staple of Rishi Sunak’s campaign was the insistence that immigrants threaten the sustainability of the welfare state.

    On the other side of the North Sea, the political party that won the Dutch elections made the argument that immigrants are “pampered” a central feature of its election platform.

    Ironically, all three of these countries are among the most exclusionary, according to the most recent IESPI data, as the graph below illustrates. (Note that the IESPI is organized such that a value of 0 is maximally inclusionary and 100 is maximally exclusionary.)

    Inclusionary trends have ended

    A second observation is that the era of social welfare systems becoming more inclusive for immigrants has ended.

    From 1990 until the 2010s, most western welfare systems were removing barriers for immigrant access to social programs. But since then, levels of immigrant welfare exclusion have not changed dramatically over time.

    Closer inspection shows that this picture of stability since the 2010s hides negative trends in different social programs.

    On the one hand, health-care programs and active labour market policies have gradually become more inclusionary. More and more countries have been making health-care services accessible for vulnerable immigrant populations, and rolling out targeted programs to improve newcomers’ chances on the labour market.

    On the other hand, social assistance policies have generally become more exclusionary over time. Many countries have intensified restrictions for recent arrivals, migrants without permanent residence status and migrants who cannot demonstrate successful integration.

    Large differences in historical trajectories

    When we look beyond aggregate trends, we also note very different trajectories in different countries.

    In some countries (Austria, Germany, Finland, Iceland, Malta, New Zealand, Portugal and Spain), social programs have become consistently more inclusionary.

    Other countries (Canada, Luxembourg and Sweden) have also undergone an inclusionary development, although at a more modest pace of change.

    In a third set of countries (Australia, Belgium, Denmark, France, Ireland, Italy, Norway and Switzerland), policies initially became more inclusionary but this trend was halted or reversed around 2010. The social programs of three other countries (the Netherlands, the United Kingdom and the United States), finally, have consistently become more exclusionary over time.

    These comparisons within the IESPI data set hopefully enable us to make sense of the frequently charged nature of discussions about immigrants’ access to social programs.

    Most obviously, they show we should be cautious when listening to some of the politicians who are most critical of immigrant welfare access, like Donald Trump, Rishi Sunak and Geert Wilders.

    If their arguments that exclusionary reforms in their countries are nothing but reasonable adjustments to overly generous approaches ever had any merit, that merit is quickly evaporating.

    Edward Koning received funding from the Social Science and Humanities Research Council of Canada to collect the data for this project.

    ref. Politicians’ attacks on immigrants lack solid evidence: New data set the record straight – https://theconversation.com/politicians-attacks-on-immigrants-lack-solid-evidence-new-data-set-the-record-straight-251853

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI Global: With Hooters on the verge of bankruptcy, a psychologist reflects on her time spent studying the servers who work there

    Source: The Conversation – USA – By Dawn Szymanski, Professor of Psychology, University of Tennessee

    Servers told researchers that they were instructed to make their male customers feel special. Brian Brainerd/The Denver Post via Getty Images

    In 1983, six businessmen got together and opened the first Hooters restaurant in Clearwater, Florida. Hooters of America LLC quickly became a restaurant chain success story.

    With its scantily clad servers and signature breaded wings, the chain sells sex appeal in addition to food – or as one of the company’s mottos puts it: “You can sell the sizzle, but you have to deliver the steak.” It inspired a niche restaurant genre called “breastaurants,” with eateries such as the Tilted Kilt Pub & Eatery and Twin Peaks replicating Hooters’ busty business model.

    A decade ago, business was booming for breastaurant chains, with these companies experiencing record sales growth.

    Today it’s a different story. Declining sales, rising costs and a large debt burden of approximately US$300 million have threatened Hooters’ long-term outlook. In summer 2024, the chain closed over 40 of its restaurants across the U.S. In February 2025, Bloomberg reported that the company was on the verge of filing for bankruptcy.

    Hooters isn’t necessarily going away for good. But it’s certainly looking like there will be fewer opportunities for women to work as “Hooters Girls” – and for customers to ogle at them.

    As a psychologist, I was originally interested in studying servers at breastaurants because I could sense an interesting dynamic at play. On the one hand, it can feel good to be complimented for your looks. On the other hand, I also wondered whether constantly being critiqued might eventually wear these servers down.

    So my research team and I decided to study what it was like to work in places like Hooters.

    In a series of studies, here’s what we found.

    Concocting a male fantasyland

    More so than most restaurants, managers at breastaurants like Hooters seek to strictly regulate how their employees look and act.

    For one of our studies, we interviewed 11 women who worked in breastaurants.

    Several of them said that they were told to be “camera ready” at all times.

    One described being given a booklet with exacting standards outlining her expected appearance, down to “nails, hair, makeup, brushing your teeth, wearing deodorant.” She had to promise to stay the same weight and height, wear makeup every shift and not change her hairstyle.

    Beyond a carefully constructed physical appearance, the servers relayed that they were also expected to be confident, cheerful, charming, outgoing and emotionally steeled. They were instructed to make male customers feel special, to be their “personal cheerleaders,” as one interviewee put it, and to never challenge them.

    Suffice it say, these demands can be unrealistic – and many of the servers we interviewed described becoming emotionally drained and eventually souring on the role.

    ‘The girls are a dime a dozen’

    It probably won’t come as a surprise that Hooters servers often encounter lewd remarks, sexual advances and other forms of sexual harassment from customers.

    But because their managers often tolerate this behavior from customers, it created the added burden of what psychologists call “double-binds” – situations where contradictory messages make it impossible to respond properly.

    For example, say a regular customer who’s a generous tipper decides to proposition a server. Now she’s in a predicament. She’s been instructed to make customers feel special. And he’s already left a big tip, in addition to being a regular. But she also feels creeped out, and his advances make her feel worthless. Should she push back?

    GOP presidential candidate Bob Dole shakes hands with Hooters employees after a campaign rally in Jacksonville, Fla., in 1996.
    J. David Ake/AFP via Getty Images

    You might assume that managers, aware that their scantily clad employees would be more likely to face harassment, would try to set boundaries and throw out customers who treated servers poorly. But we found that waitresses at breastaurants have less support from both management and their co-workers than servers at other restaurants.

    “Unfortunately, the girls are a dime a dozen, and that’s how they’re treated,” a former server and corporate trainer at a breastaurant explained.

    The lack of co-worker support might also come as a surprise. Rather than standing in solidarity, the servers tended to compete for favoritism, better shifts and raises from their bosses. Gossiping, name-calling and scapegoating were commonplace.

    The psychological toll

    My research team also wanted to learn more about the specific emotional and psychological costs of working in these types of environments.

    Psychologists Barbara Fredrickson and Tomi-Ann Robert have found that mental health problems that disproportionately affect women often coincide with sexual objectification.

    So we weren’t surprised to find that servers working in sexually objectifying restaurant environments, such as Hooters and Twin Peaks, reported more symptoms of depression, anxiety and disordered eating than those working in other restaurants. In addition, they wanted to be thinner, were more likely to monitor their weight and appearance, and were more dissatisfied with their bodies. Hooters didn’t reply to a request for comment on this story.

    Why are women drawn to the job?

    Given our findings, you might wonder why any women would choose to work in places like Hooters in the first place.

    The women we interviewed said that they sought work in breastaurants to make more money and have more flexibility.

    A number of servers in one of our studies noted that they could make more money this way than waitressing at a regular restaurant or in other “real” jobs.

    For example, one of the servers we interviewed used to work at a more run-of-the-mill restaurant.

    “It was OK, I made OK money,” she told us. “But working at Hooters … I’ve walked out with hundreds of dollars in one shift.”

    All the women we interviewed were in college or were mothers. So they enjoyed the high degree of flexibility in their work schedule that breastaurants provided.

    Finally, several of them had previously experienced objectification while growing up, or they’d participated in activities centered on physical appearance, such as beauty pageants and cheerleading. This likely contributed to their decision to work at a Hooters or one of its competitors: They’d been objectified as adolescents, and so they found themselves drawn to these kinds of setting as adults.

    Even so, our research suggests that the financial rewards and flexibility of working in breastaurants probably aren’t worth the potential psychological costs.

    Dawn Szymanski does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. With Hooters on the verge of bankruptcy, a psychologist reflects on her time spent studying the servers who work there – https://theconversation.com/with-hooters-on-the-verge-of-bankruptcy-a-psychologist-reflects-on-her-time-spent-studying-the-servers-who-work-there-251217

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI Global: Trump’s tariffs on Canada and Mexico could spell trouble for distilled spirits

    Source: The Conversation – USA – By Andrew Muhammad, Professor of Agriculture and Resource Economics, University of Tennessee

    If all the tariff drama in the news lately has you reaching for a stiff drink, you’re not alone. Unfortunately, those same tariffs might make it harder to get your hands on your favorite brand of tequila.

    In early March 2025, U.S. President Donald Trump levied import tariffs of 25% on goods from Canada and Mexico, following through on a promise he made back in November 2024. While he later partially reversed course, suspending tariffs on some goods, tensions remain high. Mexico is largely holding off on retaliation, but Canada quickly fired back with counter-tariffs on billions of dollars’ worth of U.S. products.

    These trade tensions spell trouble for numerous industries, including the booming spirits market. Canada and Mexico – two of the top U.S. trading partners – accounted for nearly half of the US$12 billion in distilled spirits the U.S. imported in 2024.

    As an agricultural economist, I’ve analyzed how a 25% tariff could affect tequila, whiskey and other distilled spirits – and the results weren’t pretty. I found that these tariffs would cost distilled spirit importers over $1 billion in lost trade, with tequila alone taking a more than $800 million hit.

    Americans’ thirst for imported liquor

    The U.S. imports far more distilled spirits than it exports – five times as much by value, as of 2024.

    Since 2000, U.S. imports of distilled spirits have surged by more than 300%, driven largely by the explosive rise in tequila consumption. Between 2000 and 2024, tequila imports rose by 1,400%, skyrocketing from $350 million to $5.4 billion.

    While imports of whiskey, liqueurs, vodka and brandy also grew, none matched tequila’s explosive rise. Tequila now represents 45% of all spirits imported into the U.S., up from 12% in 2000.

    Not surprisingly, 99% of tequila and mezcal is imported from Mexico, making it the leading foreign supplier of distilled spirits to the United States. Meanwhile, Canada has supplied between 4% and 6% of U.S. spirits imports over the past two decades, primarily whiskey and liqueurs.

    Since distilled spirits are classified as agricultural products, their rising imports have significantly contributed to the U.S. agricultural trade deficit. However, this isn’t necessarily a problem. Imports help meet demand from U.S. consumers, generate value-added opportunities for U.S. companies, and support economic activity in bars, liquor stores, restaurants and beyond.

    A 25% tariff on Mexican goods is a 25% tax on tequila

    In my study, published in February in the peer-reviewed journal Agribusiness and in a follow-up policy brief, I found that 25% tariffs on Mexico and Canada could reduce imports of distilled spirits by $1.2 billion. This loss exceeds the total amount of tax revenue those tariffs can expected to bring in.

    Unsurprisingly, tequila imports would be the hardest hit, falling by $810 million. I found that the tariff revenue from tequila – $910 million – could actually exceed the corresponding fall in imports. That’s because demand for tequila, like most alcoholic beverages, is what economists call “inelastic,” meaning that when prices rise, consumers are unlikely to change their purchasing decisions by very much.

    However, it would be a mistake to consider tequila in isolation. When I factored in other notable decreases, such as a $100 million drop in whiskey imports, I found that the value of total trade losses, in the form of decreased imports, would outweigh the total tariff revenue. I also found that no product category would come out ahead.

    In fact, even products like vodka, which are mostly exempt from these tariffs, would be indirectly affected. This is because tariffs can increase the overall cost of importing, leading businesses to reduce all imports, tariffed or otherwise. My research suggests that this “trade destruction” effect, to use an economics term, will be quite significant.

    A new era of tariffs

    The Trump administration has argued that tariffs will generate a lot of money for the federal government. But my research suggests those gains may not outweigh the economic costs to businesses and consumers.

    Contrary to common belief, trade losses don’t just affect exporting countries. Domestic consumers also face higher prices and fewer choices – hurting their overall economic welfare. Reducing imports also affects U.S. businesses involved in marketing, distribution and sales.

    Trade is more complex than a simple formula of “exports good, imports bad.” Research makes it clear that tariffs have negative consequences, including higher consumer prices, reduced product availability and downstream economic disruption. Policymakers would be wise to take those effects seriously. Otherwise, they might find themselves with a serious economic hangover.

    Andrew Muhammad does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. Trump’s tariffs on Canada and Mexico could spell trouble for distilled spirits – https://theconversation.com/trumps-tariffs-on-canada-and-mexico-could-spell-trouble-for-distilled-spirits-251583

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI Global: Medetomidine is replacing xylazine in Philly street fentanyl − creating new hurdles for health care providers and drug users

    Source: The Conversation – USA – By Kory London, Associate Professor of Emergency Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University

    Medetomidine is now a key ingredient in street fentanyl sold in Philly. AP Photo/Matt Rourke

    Philadelphia’s street opioid supply – or “dope” market – is constantly changing. As health care workers and researchers who care for people who use drugs in our community, we have witnessed these shifts firsthand.

    New adulterants are frequently added to the mix. They bring additional and often uncertain risks for people who use drugs, and new challenges for the health care providers and systems who treat them.

    The latest adulterant to dominate the supply is medetomidine.

    What is medetomodine?

    Medetomidine, pronounced meh-deh-TOH-muh-deen, is a drug used in veterinary medicine for sedation, muscle relaxation and pain relief, often during surgery. It is an alpha-2 adrenergic agonist, which essentially means it works by slowing the release of adrenaline in the brain and body.

    In May 2024, the Philadelphia Medical Examiner’s Office began testing for medetomidine in people who died from fatal overdoses. By the end of the year, 46 of the deceased had tested positive for the substance, in addition to fentanyl and other known chemicals.

    In fact, medetomidine is quickly becoming more common in Philadelphia’s street opioid supply than even xylazine, a non-FDA-approved sedative linked to skin ulceration, chronic wounds and amputation.

    Xylazine was first detected in Philadelphia street drugs in 2006 and became increasingly common starting in 2015. By early 2023, xylazine was detected in 98% of tested dope samples in the city.

    However, its presence is steadily dropping, according to local drug-checking program data. The Philadelphia Department of Public Health says medetomidine has emerged as a primary adulterant and is now twice as common as xylazine in drug-checked samples.

    Recent studies show even more unusual substances entering the street fentanyl supply, such as the industrial solvent BTMPS.

    At the same time, hospital and behavioral health providers are reporting more common presentations of severe withdrawal symptoms among people who use drugs in Philadelphia.

    Risks of medetomidine

    While medetomidine’s sedating effects are similar in mechanism to xylazine, it is upward of 10-20 times more potent. It suppresses brain signals in the central nervous system, leading to deep sedation.

    Since medetomidine is so powerful and does not act on opioid receptors, a person who overdoses on it often does not respond to the opioid-reversal drug naloxone, which goes by the brand name Narcan, in the manner we commonly expect from people who appear to have overdosed on opioids.

    When patients overdose on a combination of opioids and medetomidine, providing naloxone will help individuals start breathing again but does not reverse the sedation caused by the medetomidine.

    From our clinical experience, after patients start to breathe normally, providing additional doses of naloxone does not seem to help and even risks prompting opioid withdrawal symptoms.

    Additionally, medetomidine presents serious clinical challenges for health care workers treating patients in withdrawal. These patients often experience symptoms such as rapid heart rate, severe spikes in blood pressure, restlessness, disorientation and confusion, and severe vomiting. While many of these symptoms were similar, if less intense, for those withdrawing from opioids and xylazine, the number of patients we are seeing is unprecedented – as is the severity of their symptoms.

    While published data on humans’ withdrawal from medetomidine is limited, clinicians are drawing comparisons to dexmedetomidine, a related drug used in humans that has shown similar features when withdrawn too quickly.

    Researchers and clinicians in Philadelphia’s hospitals, including us at Thomas Jefferson University, are analyzing emerging clinical data. This data suggests that existing protocols that effectively controlled withdrawal symptoms in the era when xylazine was common are no longer adequate in the era of medetomidine. New protocols have been developed based on the guidance of local experts and are being tested.

    When patients overdose on a combination of opioids and medetomidine, providing naloxone can help individuals start breathing again but does not reverse the sedation caused by the medetomidine.
    AP Photo/Alex Brandon

    Approaches to drug testing

    The rise in severe withdrawal symptoms has prompted expanded testing for adulterants such as medetomidine in Jefferson’s emergency departments.

    Currently, drug testing involves two primary approaches. Qualitative analysis determines the presence or absence of substances. For example, fentanyl and xylazine test strips are commonly used by harm reduction groups and people who use drugs. Unfortunately, they can be unreliable and prone to user error, expiration, misinterpretation and false positives or negatives. This technology is also commonly used in urine drug-testing kits sold over the counter.

    Quantitative analysis, on the other hand, is a more sophisticated approach to drug testing. It uses complex technology such as liquid-phase chromatography and mass spectrometry to separate the individual components of a sample and determine their concentration. This form of testing is more expensive and requires specialized equipment and analysts to perform the tests and interpret the results.

    Hospitals in the city have begun selectively testing urine and blood samples from patients who present with suspected medetomidine exposure. The labs are looking for the presence of certain drugs and their related byproducts, and also trying to identify distinct concentrations that might be associated with overdose, intoxication and withdrawal.

    Implications for public health

    We believe Philadelphians should be aware of these recent changes in the street drug supply and how people in their communities may react to exposure to medetomidine.

    Naloxone is still recommended for a person showing signs of opioid overdose – such as excess sedation, shallow or absent breathing and small pupils. Narcan is freely available at pharmacies around the city. But if the patient starts breathing but does not immediately wake up, additional doses of naloxone should be avoided.

    As always, contact 911 for expert assistance and to get patients to an emergency department to complete their care.

    Patients who use large amounts of drugs may suffer from severe withdrawal symptoms. Typical medications given to those in opioid withdrawal, such as buprenorphine or methadone, may not be sufficient to treat this constellation of symptoms. Even medications and regimens tailored for xylazine may not be effective.

    Patients with severe withdrawal symptoms need to be seen in the emergency department, given the risk of undertreating this emerging condition.

    Read more of our stories about Philadelphia.

    Kory London receives funding from The Sheller Family Foundation.

    Karen Alexander receives funding from the National Institutes on Drug Abuse (NIDA).

    ref. Medetomidine is replacing xylazine in Philly street fentanyl − creating new hurdles for health care providers and drug users – https://theconversation.com/medetomidine-is-replacing-xylazine-in-philly-street-fentanyl-creating-new-hurdles-for-health-care-providers-and-drug-users-251753

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI USA: Social Workers Are a Vital Part of Care Teams

    Source: US State of Connecticut

    Broadly defined, sometimes overlooked and often misunderstood, social work is a crucial component in health care.

    It can even be life-saving.

    “I had a patient who wrote a message in [UConn Health’s patient portal] MyChart to their physical therapist saying, ‘I’m not coming in today, because I think I’m going to end my life,’” says Rachel Boxwell, a licensed clinical social worker who supports many of UConn Health’s outpatient practices. “The physical therapist lets me know, and I’m able to call the patient. They’re sitting in their car, we have a conversation, try to figure out what’s going to be the next step to keep them safe.”

    It’s possible that intervention prevented a suicide, and is an example of how social workers can support patients even outside of scheduled face-to-face interactions.

    Eleanor Szmurlo ’17 MSW is a licensed clinical social worker who supports UConn Health’s outpatient practices. (Photo provided by Eleanor Szmurlo)

    UConn Health employs 35 social workers. Collectively they work with patients in both inpatient and outpatient settings.

    Boxwell works in tandem with Eleanor Szmurlo ’17 MSW to cover more than 50 of UConn Health’s outpatient practices as part of UConn Health’s population health team.

    “I previously worked as a substance abuse counselor and have seen first-hand how stigma can prevent people from getting appropriate care,” Szmurlo says. “In my role supporting the outpatient clinics, I have the opportunity to show compassion and care to our patients and to connect them with the supports they need to live happier, healthier lives.”

    Amanda Mundo works with hospitalized patients, primarily on the fourth floor of UConn’s John Dempsey Hospital, a medical-surgical floor.

    Amanda Mundo is a licensed clinical social worker in UConn’s John Dempsey Hospital. (Photo by Chris DeFrancesco)

    “I go through the entire floor and look at every single patient and familiarize myself with those I’m not familiar with yet,” Mundo says. “In this setting, social work is a universal service available to all patients where we offer both ‘case finding,’ where we’ll review patients’ charts, see if there’s anything documented in an area that we feel we could help, and we also get consultations from the team. Once I go through the list in the morning of the whole floor, I triage to see who might need to be seen first, and build my day from there.”

    Five stories below her, in the Connecticut Children’s Neonatal Intensive Care Unit at UConn Health, Brittney Niro works with every parent whose child is admitted to the NICU.

    Brittney Niro is a licensed clinical social worker in the Connecticut Children’s NICU at UConn Health. (Photo by Chris DeFrancesco)

    “I assist families with psychosocial needs and community resources,” Niro says. “Parents don’t anticipate a NICU stay, even if they are counseled on it or prepped. The reality hits once their baby is admitted to the NICU. I value being a part of a multidisciplinary team and providing emotional support and resources during their baby’s NICU stay.”

    Niro also facilitates a support group for NICU parents.

    Many of the inpatient social workers report to Lori Pawlow, UConn Health nursing director who oversees case management.

    “Social work services span from birth to end of life,” Pawlow says. “They are present to provide support during the most vulnerable times in patients’ and families’ life experiences. They help by supporting them and guide them in difficult life choices. One very important aspect of the work that social workers do is that they approach all situations in a holistic manner that supports individuals and the whole family. We are very fortunate to have such a talented and dedicated team of social workers here at UConn Health.”

    How patients find their way to a social worker will vary. In the outpatient setting, providers can refer patients to social workers. When that happens, Szmurlo or Boxwell will contact the patient and evaluate their psychosocial needs.

    Rachel Boxwell is a licensed clinical social worker who supports UConn Health’s outpatient practices. (Photo by Chris DeFrancesco)

    “If you’re having a housing challenge, that could really be exacerbated if you are wheelchair-bound or you need certain levels of accessibility,” Boxwell says. “Or you might need home care, and in theory that sounds simple, but if you can’t self-direct your care due to mental health or cognitive decline, those have additional barriers. So I really can assess all of those, help identify what resources are available to our patients, and really talk it through and help them make an informed decision. Sometimes a resource can sound great, but it’s not a great fit for our patients for reasons like medical complexity, their cognitive ability, maybe a familial relationship, where they live and who they live with.”

    Anne Horbatuck is chief operating officer of the UConn Medical Group and vice president for ambulatory operations.

    “Social workers play a vital role in our outpatient clinic settings,” Horbatuck says. “They address social, emotional, and environmental factors that impact patients’ health. They provide counseling, connect patient with community resources and support care coordination to improve treatment outcomes. Their involvement helps reduce barriers to care, enhance patient well-being and promote a more holistic approach to health care. Rachel and Eleanor cover our UMG clinics along with many others that are department-based. We thank them for all for all they do.”

    Why Social Work

    Boxwell, who arrived at UConn Health in 2022, has been a social worker since 2016. She found her way to the profession after a year of teaching high school English in Malden, Massachusetts.

    “A lot of my students were living in shelters, were teenage parents, were in foster homes, and getting them to the point where they’re even in a spot where they could actually be present in class was social work, was connecting them to resources, was meeting their psychosocial needs,” Boxwell says. “And I realized I had a passion for it, and there was such a need for that.”

    From left: Brittney Niro, a social worker in the Connecticut Children’s Neonatal Intensive Care Unit at UConn Health, speaks with nurse colleagues Jacqueline Calderon and Tess Connor at their NICU nurse’s station. (Photo by Chris DeFrancesco)

    Niro has been a social worker since 2009 and joined UConn Health in 2018 as an inpatient social worker on the sixth floor of John Dempsey Hospital. She moved to the NICU in 2022.

    “What draws me to the profession is helping families navigate during a vulnerable time,” Niro says. “I knew I wanted to be in the helping profession; I was involved as a peer advocate during high school. The peer advocate program allowed me to be a peer support for younger peers, and I had a mentor who suggested, ‘You’d be a great social worker, you really should look into social work.’”

    Mundo joined UConn Health two years ago and has been a social worker since 2016.

    “I like relating with people and really being able to build relationships,” Mundo says. “Being able to be there for someone in a moment of need or vulnerability is an honor and not something that everyone has the opportunity to do. You can really make a big difference even with seemingly smaller gestures or tasks.”

    She says every day on the job is different.

    “It ranges from smaller tasks such as helping a patient to get clothing, helping to coordinate transportation home, to helping them make a phone call that they’ve been really struggling to make, to more serious matters such as substance use, safety issues, crisis intervention, and end-of-life hospice,” Mundo says.

    Szmurlo, who graduated with a Master of Social Work from the UConn School of Social Work in 2017, has spent her nearly three years at UConn Health in an outpatient role.

    “The social and medical systems we work with can be overwhelming and complicated to manage when things are going well — even more so when people are undergoing a health crisis,” Szmurlo says. “By helping patients navigate services, we can make this less overwhelming and reinforce to patients that UConn Health is here to treat the whole person.”

    Misperceptions

    Boxwell and Mundo both say it’s common for people to associate their profession with child protective services and people whose job is to separate children from their families.

    “Of course, part of our role is to assess for safety, but our job is so much more than that,” Mundo says. “It’s very multifaceted. It can range from smaller, simple tasks to really intense clinically, emotionally draining, and taxing interactions. A lot of people don’t know what we do day-to-day. A lot of it is behind the scenes, but it does make a really big difference, for the medical team and for the patients.”

    She says it’s about an even split between those who understand the social worker is there to help and those who would rather not have an interaction with a social worker, as they may not understand a social worker’s role in this setting.

    Niro points out that patients or families may not always realize that social workers are independently licensed clinicians.

    “We can diagnose and assess mental health needs,” Niro says. “A social worker can be an autonomous, independent mental health professional. Sometimes the term ‘social work’ is used to explain many different roles and responsibilities. Being a medical social worker is a rewarding career.”

    What I find most rewarding about being a social worker is being able to be there for people when they’re at their most vulnerable. &#8212 Amanda Mundo

    ‘An Honor’

    Niro says she appreciates the multidisciplinary team approach, working with nurses, physicians, advanced practice providers and others, and the comradery that naturally comes with it.

    “I find my job to be rewarding in the sense that families need someone to be in their corner,” Niro says. “I truly enjoy being a constant support and advocate to each family during a challenging time.”

    “What I find most rewarding about being a social worker is being able to be there for people when they’re at their most vulnerable,” Mundo says. “It’s really an honor to be there for someone when they need it the most and to be that support when oftentimes a lot of patients don’t have any support.”

    Similarly, Szmurlo says, “It’s an honor to be a social worker and to be able to support people through some of the most difficult times in their lives.”

    Boxwell says what may seem like a small thing can make big difference in the lives of patients and families who have been struggling.

    “It can be life-changing for them, and knowing the ripple effect that that then can have on their life — not just their quality of life, but their relationships with others, their ability to be financially solvent, to then be able to have a solvent retirement, to not be concerned about what’s going to happen with their disease process because they know they have a team to support them, being able to relieve folks of that — it’s a great feeling,” Boxwell says. “You have changed that person’s life for the better, and that will continue having a ripple effect.”

    March is National Social Work Month.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Art Exhibition No ‘Joke’ in Asking Hard Questions

    Source: US State of Connecticut

    Sure, in her spare time growing up Krista Mitchell did what any only child might do to keep busy – doodle in a notebook, design a maze like the one in her coloring book, devote hours to reading.

    But Mitchell ’25 (SFA, CLAS) says she often took those projects to the nth degree.

    “I actually made a household newspaper in which I wrote the articles and drew pictures to go with them. I even used to go crazy sending thank you cards to my family. I would do these elaborate drawings on the envelopes to the point that the post office would send them back because they couldn’t read the addresses,” she says. “So, yeah, I’ve always been very creative.”

    There should be no surprise then when, as a high school senior, she used an assignment to make an animal mask as an opportunity to build giant luna moth wings large enough for an adult to wear.

    And that final project for a basic photography class at UConn, of course it became the basis for a presentation at the Humanities Undergraduate Research Symposium last year and the reason she was asked to talk during a Humanities Institute conversation on the loneliness epidemic in the fall.

    You bet, it even got her an on-air interview with Connecticut Public Radio.

    “All of this was absolutely meant to be,” she says. “It all just happened, honestly.”

    In the same way, she sort of fell into her latest project, “Joker Stardust,” an art exhibition on display this week that she says started as a critique of consumerism inspired by the 1980s but eventually morphed into a multilayered project focused on the 1960s and 1970s that asks the question, “Who am I?”

    Well, who is Krista Mitchell?

    Mitchell, a double major in English and art who’ll graduate in December, says she started at UConn planning to exclusively major in English and eventually embark on a career as a journalist or teacher. After all, in high school, she’d had success in various writing contests and people always told her she was a good writer.

    Krista Mitchell ’25 (SFA, CLAS) is a double major in art and English. Her solo art exhibition, “Joker Stardust,” opens March 27 and runs through March 30. (Branaugh Morton/Nutmeg Magazine)

    But that first year in college, she found herself drowning in the largeness of the University and escaped in the safety of her art minor.

    “I took my first art class, Drawing I, and noticed it gave me something I could channel my energy into,” she says. “I felt safe in the small classes where everybody knew who I was, and the teacher actually cared about me. She was the one who said, ‘Krista, there’s something about your artwork that is special. I don’t know what it is, but you have something, and I think you should keep going with it.’ That’s pretty high praise for someone who was just starting.”

    That’s the thing about art, she notes, “People think they can’t do it, but everyone has it in them. You just have to slow down and study your surroundings.”

    A passion for art started to grow inside her, so elevating it to a second major was a no-brainer. She elected the Bachelor of Arts track in the art and art history department over the Bachelor of Fine Arts because it allowed her to generalize her courses, rather than pick a specific concentration.

    If she had to pick, she says, she would have opted for animation and illustration – you might have seen her regular comics and illustrations in The Daily Campus – and that would have been the wrong choice, knowing what she knows now.

    “Doing this project, ‘Joker Stardust,’ has shown me that I would be a painting and drawing major because animation and illustration is more about communicating something for an editorial purpose or storytelling and making characters. My mind doesn’t work like that. I’m more of a conceptual person,” she says.

    She likes the bright colors of pop art, and things another person might describe as being “off” or just a little bit “creepy,” like those baby dolls whose eyelids open when upright and close when reclined.

    She absolutely loves liminal spaces like empty parking lots at night with only the overhead lights illuminated, giving an eerie glow to a familiar place. Candles also are a favorite, if only for the impermanence they represent.

    And, vaporwave, oh vaporwave, the aesthetic that pulls from the 1980s and 1990s is close to her heart, along with fashions from the 1960s and 1970s that she finds at thrift shops and wears around campus: cloth hairbands, chunky-heeled shoes, blazers with pinstriped lapels, and miniskirts.

    “I know what my vision is as an artist, and I’m able to apply it to a lot of different mediums,” she says. “I say that now, but I know in a couple years, I’ll again say, ‘I don’t know who I am,’ because that’s part of being an artist. You go through these phases of ‘Who am I?’ Fortunately, right now, I’m in a phase where I feel confident.”

    But is everything by chance?

    In coming to UConn, Mitchell received the Presidential Scholars Enrichment Award, giving her $2,500 for a project of her choosing. But one must choose carefully, and Mitchell mulled ideas for three years. Publishing a book seemed most logical. Then, she saw an art exhibition last spring from Irene Pham ’24 (SFA), a solo show that included paintings about Pham’s family, immigration, and the mixed feelings she had about the two.

    Mitchell had taken Art 1010, “Foundation: Studio Concepts,” with associate professor John O’Donnell early on in her studies and liked his teaching style. Plus, they share an affinity for vaporwave.

    “I sent him an email with an independent study proposal, explaining I wanted to do an exhibition. It was one of the longest emails I ever wrote, and amazingly he agreed. He hardly knew me, but he did remember me,” she says. “I’m so grateful to him because this has changed my life.”

    O’Donnell suggested she make a series of collages and use her time over the summer of 2024 to purchase panels of varying sizes and rummage second-hand stores for magazines, books, and other items.

    Krista Mitchell ’25 (SFA, CLAS) made this 3-by-3-foot collage for her upcoming art exhibition, “Joker Stardust.” The piece includes doilies that her grandmother made. (Krista Mitchell)

    Mitchell was close with her maternal grandmother, Catherine “Kay” Holloway, who left behind a treasure trove of collections and her own art creations when she died in 2015. Holloway didn’t have any formal art training, but was artistic, and Mitchell says she inherited things like her fondness for antiques and oddities from her.

    With O’Donnell’s advice in mind, Mitchell poured through her grandparents’ home, taking handmade doilies, handwritten sewing patterns, hand drawn five-point stars, among other things like Kewpie dolls, stained curtains, a half-drained Snoopy snow globe, and pink graph paper.

    “The thing with collages,” Mitchell explains, “it’s kind of like you’re going through an archive and taking the history of these objects and putting them in a new story. You’re almost recontextualizing them.”

    She spent at least a hundred hours cutting out pictures from magazines like Ladies’ Home Journal and Reader’s Digest and sorting images of Hummel figurines, angels, and Barbie dolls.

    That way, when winter break came early this year, she could start creating, again with O’Donnell’s words in mind reminding her to choose items intentionally, as if to tell a story, and not just for decoration.

    As she did, questions started swirling in her head: Why am I so much like my grandmother? Why am I like this? Why do I dress like this? Why do I like this stuff? The theme of consumerism muted to make room for concepts like individual creativity, religion, the meaning of life, and what happens after death.

    “I started to think about what this all could mean and what I landed on was one idea,” she says. “Could the belief that there is some sort of greater meaning to life or higher power give people an incentive to create with intention?

    “That’s when I realized I love a lot of this stuff because of the history behind it. My grandmother was very careful about building her collection of seemingly random things. She had her own artistic vision, and she was very intentional with how she did things and how they reflected the story she was trying to tell.

    “Like, I don’t know who owned this, but somebody did before I did,” Mitchell says, tugging at her second-hand jacket. “That’s kind of mysterious and interesting, right? There is something greater that connects me to my grandmother, that connects me to these interests I have, the way I dress, and the aesthetics of these previous time periods.”

    None of the 25 collages are titled, Mitchell says, and that’s intentional because they’re supposed to resemble things one might find at an antique store. As for the title of the show, “Joker Stardust,” that was purposeful, based on a joker card she found at her grandparents’.

    “Is everything around us by chance? Is it a joke or is there some sort of divine power making the world as it is or is it random,” Mitchell asks, adding that “stardust” hearkens to the 1970s David Bowie character Ziggy Stardust.

    As part of the project, she ended up publishing a book, putting her writing skills to use as she penned thoughts on each collage. She has 20 copies of “Joker Stardust” in her possession, some of which will be for sale during the show’s opening Thursday, March 27.

    “My parents have always been very supportive, all through school, helping me with stuff like this project. They’ve always been there, which I’m very grateful for,” she says.

    In the show, Mitchell says she’s placed a mirror, with the idea that you see not just your reflection but also those family members who came before you. How did these people find each other, she asks, because without them there wouldn’t be you.

    And without stardust, there wouldn’t be anything.

    “Joker Stardust” will open Thursday, March 27, in the VAIS Gallery, Room 109, in the Art Building on the Storrs campus. A reception will be held from 4 to 6 p.m. The show will be open Friday, March 28, through Sunday, March 30, from noon to 4 p.m.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Address to the National Press Club, Canberra

    Source: Australian Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister for Industry

    Here we are, back again on Ngunnawal land, gathering at the kind invitation of Maurice and the Board, sponsors and members of the National Press Club.

    But since last time, not just one new President but 2: Trump; and Connell.

    Congratulations Tom on your election, and thanks for your introduction –

    And to everyone here, including the pundits and, on recent form, maybe a couple of protesters again too.

    Last night marked the first time since Ben Chifley was PM and Treasurer, more than 3 quarters of a century ago, that there’ve been 4 budgets in a single term.

    And of the 11 times I’ve spoken here, I think it’s the 4 post‑Budget opportunities I’ve cherished the most.

    Partly because Laura Chalmers comes along, and is here again, she brought Leo last night, and that means a lot to me.

    And also, because they offer us the chance to go behind the Budget a bit, to provide some more of the colour and context.

    Today I want to talk about how our economy is turning a corner, even as global conditions take a turn for the worse.

    Explain how seismic changes in the world validate and vindicate our strategy, rather than undermine it.

    And lay out our government’s economic case for re‑election –

    Based on our progress to here, our plans from here, and the risks posed by our opponents.

    The fourth shock

    First let me sketch the backdrop.

    Twenty years ago, I fronted up for my first of 19 Budget lockups.

    Costello was Treasurer, and the global economy was a very different place.

    In the 2 decades since, half a dozen subsequent Treasurers presided over 3 big economic shocks.

    The first, a financial crisis that became a demand shock.

    The second, a pandemic that became a supply shock.

    The third, an inflationary shock that lingers around the world longer than anyone hoped.

    Escalating trade tensions now risk, if not represent, the fourth big economic shock in just 17 years.

    Now, if you think about the big post‑war global economic story.

    From Bretton Woods in 1945, to the high inflation of the 70s.

    The Washington Consensus that held from the end of the Cold War until the start of the GFC.

    There’s a tendency to talk about economic shocks as punctuation. A break in the flow.

    But the last 20 years prove that global shocks – in one form or another – are chapters in their own right.

    They no longer interrupt the story – they are the story.

    Acknowledgements

    Governing a country like ours in uncertain times like these is a responsibility we accept and an opportunity we cherish.

    Led by the Prime Minister – who is here today.

    His collaborative style of leadership is appreciated by all of us in his team.

    Katy and I told the Cabinet yesterday that we consider ourselves very fortunate to have been so well‑supported by so many ministers, a number of them here today and I thank and acknowledge them again.

    And no Treasurer has ever been more fortunate than me when it comes to the Finance Minister.

    The best colleague I’ve ever had.

    Nothing we’ve done over the course of 4 Budgets would be possible without her calm and composure, her empathy and judgement.

    Katy came to the Treasury thank you dinner on Thursday night.

    I’m told that’s unprecedented – but for us it’s not unusual.

    I’m sure Katy would agree it’s not the most glamorous ritual.

    The pile of pide boxes and a sea of tired eyes sums up the week, and weeks, before.

    But it gives us a chance to say thanks to Steven, Jenny, Glyn and all the officials involved in putting this Budget together.

    That evening, I was reflecting with officials on the time I spent as a public servant, working for Glyn in Queensland.

    He was the first to tell me what it looked like inside the Cabinet Room here in Parliament House.

    Right down to the framed paintings of Australian lorikeets on the walls.

    Those birds have seen and heard a lot!

    I’m told I’ve spent 664 hours in that room this term – which is about 27 days.

    Whenever I’m in there, I try to remember that’s it’s not the birds in the frame or the galahs in the pet shop that really matter.

    We try to ensure those conversations around the cabinet table are shaped by the conversations Australians are having around the kitchen table.

    We know cost of living is front of mind for most Australians and that’s why it’s been front and centre in all 4 budgets.

    No matter how difficult or long the deliberations might be in that room I’m always aware how lucky we are to be in there.

    Treasurers stand there on Budget night on behalf of all who do so much to put our plans into Budgets, and into action.

    ERC ministers who undertake the essential deliberations – 233 of those 664 cabinet room hours were with them.

    Every member of our caucus who all do so much to advocate for the people they represent.

    The staff from our offices and all the public servants.

    Please join me in thanking them.

    Turning a corner

    This Budget makes it clear that the Australian economy is emerging from a global cost‑of‑living crisis in better shape than anywhere else.

    Inflation is down, living standards are rising, real incomes are growing, unemployment is low, interest rates are coming down, debt is down and now growth is gathering pace.

    That combination is exceptional – and not accidental.

    It is the product of the choices we have made.

    Delivering cost‑of‑living relief for every Australian.

    Strengthening Medicare and the services people count on.

    And building a Future Made in Australia.

    The 2 weeks leading into the Budget made clear just how important and urgent this work has been.

    The human and economic costs of Tropical Cyclone Alfred.

    Coming so soon after widespread flooding in north and far north Queensland – with more damaging heavy rains there just last week.

    And now, fresh turmoil in the world – part of this fourth shock.

    All of this vindicates the course we chose 3 years ago.

    And validates the choices we made together.

    Economic case for re‑election

    This is where I want to pay tribute to the Prime Minister.

    The leader Australians see standing with emergency services in disasters brings the same decency to every challenge confronting our nation.

    Anthony’s leadership is defined by his compassion, his optimism – and his determination.

    And he will make our case for re‑election to the Australian people with those same qualities and commitment.

    This election will be about the strong foundations we have laid, the better future we are building – and the risk of our opponents wrecking it all.

    It will be a referendum on Medicare.

    A simple choice between Labor cutting taxes and helping with the cost of living –

    And Peter Dutton’s secret cuts which will make Australians worse off.

    Because he wants to cut everything except income taxes for workers.

    Above all else it will be an election about the economy.

    Labor’s economic case for a second term has 3 parts:

    The progress we have made together in the economy and repairing the budget.

    The work we are doing and the economic plan we are implementing – to boost wages, rebuild living standards, and make our economy more resilient, more competitive and more productive.

    And the deliberate threat and significant danger that the Coalition pose if they form the next government.

    Reason one: progress

    The economic progress documented in the Budget last night belongs to every Australian.

    It’s all the more remarkable against a backdrop of extreme global uncertainty.

    To give you a sense of that, take inflation.

    In the most recent quarterly data, inflation sits at 2.4 per cent – and just now, today’s monthly reading came in the same.

    On election night, in May of 2022, inflation was more than double that and rising.

    So when I stood here after our first Budget in October that year, inflation was nearly triple what it is today.

    In that first Budget, we were talking about how far we had to go together.

    Today, we can point to how far we’ve come.

    We have brought inflation down while encouraging a broader recovery in our economy, now well underway.

    Our fiscal policy helped break the back of inflation when it was at its peak.

    It adjusted to support growth and preserve employment, as inflation came down.

    And we’ve delivered responsible cost‑of‑living relief that has directly taken the pressure off prices.

    Because of this a soft landing is coming into view –

    With growth rebounding, living standards recovering, and the private sector playing a larger role.

    The last financial year saw the highest level of business investment in over a decade.

    Four in every 5 of the million jobs created have been in the private sector.

    25,000 new businesses created each month this term – the highest average on record.

    Real wages and living standards rising again.

    While the gender pay gap is at near record lows and unemployment is at around 4 per cent.

    Treasury expects employment growth this year will be stronger, inflation will come down faster, and participation will stay near its record high for longer compared with the mid‑year update.

    So, our economy isn’t just growing faster, it’s growing in a way which will be stronger, more sustainable and more inclusive too.

    All this, while successfully steering towards a stunning improvement in our fiscal position.

    We inherited a mess and we’re cleaning it up.

    The budget bottom line is $207 billion better off on our watch.

    This is the biggest ever nominal improvement in a single term.

    Turning $135 billion of Liberal deficits into surpluses worth $38 billion – the first back‑to‑back surpluses in 2 decades.

    Almost halving the deficit we inherited for this financial year.

    And improving the budget position every year of the forward estimates, compared to PEFO.

    All this is a deliberate result of our responsibility and restraint.

    Banking the vast majority of revenue upgrades – around 7 of every 10 dollars.

    Restraining spending growth to 1.7 per cent – less than half the average under our predecessors.

    Finding almost $95 billion of savings – more this term than they managed over their last 2 combined, with precisely zero in their last Budget.

    Making real structural reform to secure the future of aged care and the National Disability Insurance Scheme.

    Guaranteeing the choice, dignity and security they bring to millions of Australians.

    And tackling high and rising interest costs.

    Just after coming to government, they were forecast to grow by 14.4 per cent per year.

    After 3 years of responsibility and restraint we’ve managed to cut that to 9.5 per cent.

    A big part of this story is our decision to return the vast majority of revenue upgrades to the bottom line.

    Not only has this improved the budget position by around $250 billion dollars to 2028–29.

    It means we will save about $112 billion in interest payments over the medium term.

    Reason 2: plans

    We don’t see the substantial progress we’ve made on the budget as an end in itself.

    Repairing the budget and rebuilding living standards go hand in hand.

    Our responsible approach has made room for the 5 main priorities of this Budget.

    Helping with the cost of living.

    Strengthening Medicare.

    Building more homes.

    Investing in every stage of education.

    And making our economy stronger, more productive, and more resilient.

    These are essential components of our economic plan.

    To strengthen our resilience in uncertain times.

    To create a more dynamic, competitive economy.

    And to rebuild incomes and living standards.

    Rebuilding living standards

    In this Budget we’re delivering more cost‑of‑living relief for Australians when it’s needed.

    Extending energy bill relief.

    Funding wage increases for care workers.

    Making medicines cheaper.

    Relieving student debt.

    And lowering taxes for every taxpayer.

    The combined benefit for an average household will be more than $15,000 from our 3 rounds of tax cuts and energy bill relief alone.

    Substantial relief while also building the earning capacity of Australians for the future too.

    By improving access to education – so that every Australian gets the chance to work in the jobs of the future.

    By investing in Medicare and expanding bulk billing – minimising out of pocket health costs and time out of work.

    And by moving towards universal early childhood education – so that parents can work more, if they want to.

    These parts of our plan to rebuild living standards are distinct but interlinked.

    Take our tax cut top‑up – a modest but meaningful addition to the tax cuts we’re rolling out already.

    The average annual tax cut, after this year’s and next year’s, is $2,548 or about $50 a week.

    Our tax cuts will:

    Boost incomes by 1.9 per cent within 2 years.

    Support the private sector recovery.

    Increase participation by more than 1.3 million hours –

    With Treasury estimating that 900,000 of these hours will be taken up by women.

    And give people a better start in their careers with the average young worker receiving a tax cut more than twice the size they would have under the Coalition.

    So, our tax cuts provide immediate relief while also boosting participation, aspiration, and Australians’ long‑term earning potential too.

    Resilience

    This focus on improving living standards is a big part of this Budget because it’s the fundamental mission of our government.

    Creating opportunities, and helping people seize them in a world full of churn and change.

    We cannot undo or ignore the shift from globalisation to fragmentation.

    We can determine how we respond.

    That’s what a Future Made in Australia is about.

    It’s a pro‑trade agenda, that puts a premium on private sector investment.

    It rejects self‑sabotaging tariffs and trade barriers, protectionism and isolationism.

    It focuses on how we shore up critical supply chains and become indispensable to new ones.

    This is critical to the jobs of the future.

    And it’s vital to managing uncertainty now.

    $30 billion of projects in sectors like green hydrogen, critical minerals and clean energy manufacturing have been proposed or are in development.

    Our plan is to build on this progress – improving our resilience by unlocking our competitiveness.

    In this Budget we’re facilitating more private investment in renewable energy – our fundamental comparative advantage in the new net zero economy.

    We’re funding research in clean energy technology manufacturing and low carbon liquid fuels – so we can commercialise Australian innovations.

    And we’re making big investments in green metals – leveraging our traditional strength in resources to build new opportunities.

    Reform

    A Future Made in Australia, powered by cleaner and cheaper energy, positions us as an essential part of the global net zero economy.

    This will be critical to our growth prospects.

    But it’s not the only part of our growth agenda.

    We know the foundations of future success start with more competitiveness, and a more productive economy.

    That’s why we’re reforming the payments system, our financial market infrastructure, approvals processes, our foreign investment framework and more.

    It might be unusual to keep the wheels of economic reform turning in a pre‑election Budget, but that’s what we’re doing.

    First, by banning non‑compete clauses for most workers.

    And second, by creating a national licensing scheme for electrical occupations.

    We’re proud of these changes because they show that the way to increase competition and productivity in our economy isn’t with scorched‑earth industrial relations –

    Or making Australians work longer for less.

    It’s with policy that boosts competition, while boosting wages and our workforce at the same time.

    This is a Budget that’s pro‑worker, pro‑growth and pro‑competition.

    Our reform to non‑competes will remove a handbrake on competition and a speedbump to aspiration.

    Most workers will no longer need a lawyer to get a better paying job.

    They won’t need permission from their old boss to become their own boss.

    Instead, we’re empowering them to move jobs and earn more and start businesses if they want to.

    This could add an estimated $5 billion annually to our economy.

    At the same time as average wages for those freed from these restrictions could increase by up to $2,500 a year.

    We’re also boosting competition and backing workers with a new occupational licensing regime for electricians.

    Requiring electricians to get a new license every time they want to work inter‑state is unnecessary, costly red tape.

    We’re making sure a sparky on the Tweed doesn’t need a different licence for a job in Coolangatta.

    Broader licensing reform could lift GDP by up to $10 billion a year.

    Which is why this change will be a template for future reform.

    Reason 3: risk

    Our progress to here, and our plan for what’s ahead, make up 2 parts of our economic case for re‑election.

    The third is the risk that all this could be undone by a Coalition government.

    Usually at this point in Budget week or the electoral cycle, you would set some basic tests for your opponent.

    On this occasion they’ve already failed them.

    The Coalition has put forward the ‘weakest policy offering from an opposition in living memory’, according to industry sources.

    They either don’t have a clue or they won’t come clean.

    But what looks like slapstick comedy masks more sinister intent.

    We know this because Angus Taylor has told us, and the Coalition’s position on key issues has shown us.

    Now, Angus and I don’t agree on much.

    But to give credit where it’s due, he made one insightful point recently when he said ‘the best predictor of future performance is past performance’.

    And – in a dramatic break from usual Coalition internals – Peter Dutton backed him in.

    On this, they are absolutely right.

    Their past performance is no surpluses, more waste and rorts, and more debt.

    Their past performance is middle Australia missing out – with real wages in reverse and living standards falling fast.

    Their past performance is much higher and rising inflation.

    Their past performance is Peter Dutton’s attacks on Medicare.

    But it is not just their record in government that reveals their priorities and what they would do if elected.

    Their recent record in Opposition makes it very clear:

    Australians would be worse off under Peter Dutton.

    When he cuts, Australians will pay.

    Cutting cost‑of‑living help is the only motivation that binds this Coalition clown show together.

    They’ve opposed cuts to student debt and energy bill relief.

    Opposed cheaper childcare and cheaper medicines.

    Opposed more homes and more Urgent Care Clinics.

    Today they voted for higher taxes on Australian workers.

    Australians would be much worse off if Peter Dutton had his way and they’ll be worse off still if he wins.

    This brain snap from Angus Taylor on tax makes that crystal clear.

    It means this parliamentary term finishes like it started:

    Labor helping Australians with the cost of living and Peter Dutton and the Coalition trying to prevent it.

    The Liberals and Nationals have now opposed 3 tax cuts, 3 times in 3 years.

    Instead of working with us to help Australians, they’ve got secret plans to harm them.

    It beggars belief that Peter Dutton says he will make hundreds of billions in cuts, but won’t tell Australians where or how.

    There’s only one reason for that – and people should know about it.

    The Coalition can’t find the $600 billion they need for nuclear, or the billions in cuts they’ve promised, without coming after Medicare again.

    The point I’m making is this.

    When the Australian economy is turning a corner.

    And the global economy is taking a turn for the worse.

    We can’t afford to turn back.

    Not when so little is known about the alternative.

    Conclusion

    I know this tradition is as much about your questions as it is about the Treasurer’s address.

    So let me just share some final thoughts.

    There are familiar rituals and rhythms to Budget week.

    Even after 20 years, you can still get caught up in them.

    But a budget is never about one week, or 5.

    It’s overwhelmingly a program for the years ahead.

    Ours also makes the economic case for re‑election.

    More than that, it spells out our plan for action to build on the progress we’ve made together.

    Now, it’s probably fair to say that over the years and out in the suburbs there’s been a flattening of expectations of what we can achieve through economic policymaking.

    And a narrowing of our collective sense that political leadership can make a real and tangible difference in people’s lives.

    Every one of us has reason to reflect on our role, but also, on whether we can turn it around.

    Because Australians should be proud of all that we have achieved together.

    We are on the cusp of something extraordinary in our economy.

    But something prevents us from saying so.

    Maybe that’s because of Australians’ natural streak of humility.

    Maybe after years of crisis, we’ve trained ourselves to brace for the next one.

    Maybe it’s the erosion of trust in institutions that we see around the world.

    Something that Australia has so far managed to avoid the most extreme fallout from.

    But a big part of it is undoubtedly due to the pressure people are under.

    We get that.

    Because, while we have every reason to be optimistic about the future, we understand that this can often run ahead of
    how people are faring and feeling.

    For many Australians, the pressures of the past few years have been substantial.

    So let me say we don’t just acknowledge that – we’re doing something about it.

    You saw that again in the Budget last night.

    Yes, inflation is coming down, real wages are up, unemployment is low, interest rates have started coming down, the economy is bouncing back.

    But for many people, the gap between working hard and getting ahead still needs eliminating.

    That’s why there’s more work to do.

    It’s why our focus isn’t confined to the national numbers – as important as they are.

    This Budget is about more than turning the corner, it’s a plan for where we go next.

    Not just putting the worst behind us –

    But seizing what’s in front of us.

    In this new world of uncertainty –

    Creating a new generation of prosperity –

    That is stronger, because it is more inclusive –

    In the better future that we’re building together.

    Thanks very much.

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Essential maintenance work at Coombe Country Park pool

    Source: City of Coventry

    Coombe Pool at Coombe Country Park will be lowered by 30cm heading into the summer to allow for essential maintenance work to Coombe Pool’s dam wall.

    Coombe Pool is categorised as a high-risk reservoir, which forms part of the River Sowe. The River Sowe runs through Coventry and has a dam wall which measures over 1km long and contains approximately 336,000m3 of water. The Pool was built in 1776 by Lancelot ‘Capability’ Brown and is the second-largest reservoir in Warwickshire.

    To ensure the ongoing safety of the reservoir and its dam wall, essential works are required to improve and maintain the features of the dam. The main improvements are:

    1. Maintenance to the historical bell mouth weir to ensure its longevity
    2. Repairs to the crest and downslope of the dam wall to create a uniformed height, improving the way that water flows over it
    3. Reprofiling to manage erosion around important reservoir structures
    4. Improvement of grass and light levels to limit erosion of the dam in the high water situations.

    For this work to be completed safely, the water level in Coombe Pool will need to be lowered by 30cm. The Pool has not been drained since WWII, where it was fully drained because it was thought to have been used as a navigation aid by bombers targeting the city.

    By lowering the water level, the flow of water will divert away from the usual outflow structures, allowing for safe access so repairs can be made.

    Councillor Abdul Salam Khan, Cabinet Member for Culture, Leisure, Sports and Parks and Deputy Leader, said:

    “As the weather warms up over the next few months heading into the summer, we know that lots of people will be planning to visit the park. The park will remain open as usual, but the lower water will mean that some parts of the park will have fencing up and you may be able to see some silt exposed in shallower areas, but the works are essential to ensure that people can continue to enjoy the park and the Pool for many years to come.”

    Coombe Pool Fishery will be closed for the duration of the works, which are planned to start during the closed season. The fishery will reopen as normal once all work has been completed and the water levels have been restored.

    Councillor Patricia Hetherton, Cabinet Member for City Services, said:

    “Whilst some areas of the park may look a bit different over the coming weeks, people coming to visit will still be able to enjoy the spaces as they usually would.

    “Maintaining our green spaces is very important and our Park Rangers will be working hard monitoring the oxygen levels in the lake to ensure that our wildlife is protected.”

    Works will begin in the coming weeks and will be underway heading into the summer.

    Published: Wednesday, 26th March 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI USA: A Swirl of a Day for Phytoplankton

    Source: NASA

    The Gulf of Oman is a funnel-shaped body of water between Oman and Iran that connects to the Strait of Hormuz and Persian Gulf to the east and the Arabian Sea to the west. It is a busy hub of international shipping and also supports extensive artisanal fisheries that are important to the economies of several countries in the region.
    One notable aspect of the gulf is its frequent blooms of phytoplankton—sharp increases in the population of microscopic plant-like organisms at the base of the aquatic food web. Blooms often occur in a seasonal rhythm when environmental conditions are most conducive to phytoplankton reproduction.
    The largest blooms in this region typically occur in the winter and early spring (January through March) and the summer (June through August), when water temperatures, light conditions, and nutrient availability are favorable. Monsoon winds are a key driver of winter and early spring blooms because they push surface waters away from the coast and cause an upwelling of cool, nutrient-rich water.
    Blooming phytoplankton can produce quite a show when viewed from above, sometimes becoming large enough to be visible from space. For much of February and March, multiple NASA satellites observed a bloom that drifted across the Gulf of Oman and into the Arabian Sea.

    Eddies and currents drew phytoplankton into narrow swirling bands on March 8, 2025, when the OLI (Operational Land Imager) on Landsat 8 captured the images above. The OCI (Ocean Color Instrument) on the PACE (Plankton, Aerosol, Cloud, Ocean Ecosystem) satellite acquired similar images on March 8 and March 24, along with measurements of the concentration of chlorophyll in surface waters.
    Like plants on land, phytoplankton use chlorophyll and other light-harvesting pigments to carry out photosynthesis, absorbing carbon dioxide to produce sugars for fuel. Chlorophyll in the water changes the way it reflects and absorbs sunlight, allowing scientists to map the amount and location of phytoplankton.
    The swirls of green likely include Noctiluca scintillans—a type of marine dinoflagellate that has been found here in the past. Though Noctiluca blooms can be beautiful, their presence can have serious consequences for ocean life. Bacteria consume oxygen as they break down the dead phytoplankton, which can cause hypoxia, sometimes depleting oxygen levels enough to kill fish and other marine life.
    Across the wider Arabian Sea, waters have transitioned in recent decades from supporting abundant diatoms—a type of phytoplankton important for the marine food web—to being dominated by Noctiluca. Unlike diatoms, Noctiluca can thrive in waters that are more stratified and contain fewer dissolved nutrients. This shift has had ripple effects, including an increase in jellyfish and salps, and a decline in copepods and finfish.
    NASA Earth Observatory images by Wanmei Liang, using Landsat data from the U.S. Geological Survey. Story by Adam Voiland.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Increasing customs duties on products imported from Russia and the impact on the agricultural sector in the EU – P-001208/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Priority question for written answer  P-001208/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Inese Vaidere (PPE)

    Since 2022, when Russia started its full-scale invasion and brutal war of aggression against Ukraine, the EU has implemented multiple rounds of sanctions and increased trade tariffs to reduce trade with the aggressor. However, there are still Russian products flowing into the EU market, including fertilisers, consequently fuelling the Russian war machine.

    Due to significantly lower production costs, Russian fertiliser producers continue to undercut the prices of producers in the EU and other countries. This has resulted in a worrisome dependency on cheap Russian fertilisers, posing a significant risk to food security in the EU as agricultural production is dependent on an unpredictable aggressor.

    In this context, I ask the Commission:

    • 1.The implementation of the proposed regulation on the modification of customs duties on imports of certain goods from Russia and Belarus[1] will reduce the importation of fertiliser products from Russia. However, there are concerns it may potentially lead to increased fertiliser prices in the EU, directly impacting farmers. What action will the Commission take to mitigate any damage to farmers in the EU?
    • 2.As Russia continues to wage its brutal war of aggression in Ukraine, is the Commission planning on expanding the scope of measures and increasing import tariffs for more categories of products (e.g. other types of fertiliser, or fishery products)?

    Submitted: 21.3.2025

    • [1] Commission proposal of 28 January 2025 for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the modification of customs duties applicable to imports of certain goods originating in or exported directly or indirectly from the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus (COM(2025)0034).
    Last updated: 26 March 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: UK, Philippines hold 5th Climate Change and Environment Dialogue

    Source: United Kingdom – Government Statements

    World news story

    UK, Philippines hold 5th Climate Change and Environment Dialogue

    Bilateral cooperation on climate and environment is being strengthened through discussions on science, innovation, localisation, resilience, and finance.

    His Majesty’s Ambassador to the Philippines, Laure Beaufils, and Environment Secretary and Official Representative of the President to the Climate Change Commission, Maria Antonia Yulo Loyzaga recently led the 5th UK-PH Climate Change and Environment (CCE) Dialogue to set the direction for the year, building on the successes of 2024.

    These saw UK support for the operationalisation of the Philippines’ National Adaptation Plan, mobilisation of institutional capital into renewable energy in the country through the Philippines Stock Exchange, funding to civil society across projects on biodiversity and coastal livelihoods and launching of key multi-stakeholder platforms tacking plastic pollution and blue carbon.

    Both countries agreed to establish a UK-led development partners coordination group for the localisation of climate analytics in provinces identified with high exposure to climate risks in the National Adaptation Plan, and the government’s Risk Resiliency Programme. Using the findings from pilot site of Negros Occidental, an investment platform will be developed to mobilise private capital for adaptation and resilience with a focus on climate-smart agriculture, innovative water management solutions and agroforestry projects.

    The Dialogue also agreed to ramp up support for the blue economy through the UK’s Blue Planet Fund. The new COAST (Climate and Ocean Adaptation and Sustainable Transition) programme will be rolled out in the Philippines this year, which seeks to deliver interventions that will strengthen marine protected areas, operationalise sustainable fisheries management, and promote blue carbon initiatives.

    Representatives reached an agreement to form a UK-DENR partnership mechanism to promote biodiversity and nature grants to local governments and communities that would not only support biodiversity conservation but also build resilience and provide long-term economic benefits for resource-dependent communities.

    Representatives also agreed to ramp up collaboration on climate and nature finance. Discussions covered expanding access to sustainable financing, catalysing private capital for climate change adaptation, and aligning financial strategies with climate risk assessments to develop more investment-ready portfolio for large-scale, long-term sustainability efforts.

    Ambassador Beaufils said:

    I am very proud of the progress we have made together. But we won’t rest on our laurels. We are ambitious for the future, and we will continue to deliver tangible results across adaptation, climate finance, science and research, and investments into renewable energy.

    Meanwhile, Secretary Loyzaga highlighted:

    Our Enhanced Partnership with the UK is a testament to our commitment as like-minded countries and large ocean nations to a future that is secured under a rules-based international order. The bi-annual reviews of our climate change joint work plan will allow us to align, calibrate, and adapt when we respond to geo strategic uncertainties that we actually face.

    The dialogue concluded with both countries signing a renewed partnership statement on climate and nature. The UK remains committed to supporting these efforts through expertise, financing, and advocacy for climate-vulnerable nations.

    The Dialogue was attended by high-level representatives from key agencies, including the DENR, Climate Change Commission, Department of Agriculture, Department of Finance, Department of Science and Technology, Department of Energy, Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas, National Economic and Development Authority, the Public-Private Partnership Center and the Department of Trade and Industry.

    Updates to this page

    Published 26 March 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI Russia: From a variety of products to cooking shows: what attracts visitors to Moscow fish markets

    Translartion. Region: Russians Fedetion –

    Source: Moscow Government – Government of Moscow –

    In the six months since the opening of the Moscow-on-the-Wave fish market in the Mitino district, almost half a million people have visited it. They bought fresh products, participated in tastings and watched culinary shows, reported Natalia Sergunina, Deputy Mayor of Moscow.

    The most popular products were lightly salted herring, live carp, seaweed salad and pink salmon caviar.

    The market has repeatedly hosted city festivals such as “Golden Autumn”, “Journey to Christmas”, “Chinese New Year in Moscow” and “Moscow Maslenitsa”. For each of them, the site was decorated in a corporate style, themed events were held, and promotions were launched. Thus, at Maslenitsa, you could try pancakes with a variety of seafood fillings.

    “The first modern fish market opened in the capital in the fall of 2023. Now there are two of them – in the Mitino and Kosino-Ukhtomsky districts. The new format is very popular with Muscovites and tourists. Over the past year and a half, two million people have visited the sites. They purchased about 1.5 thousand tons of products,” noted Natalya Sergunina.

    In total, the assortment includes over 600 types of fish and seafood from 13 seas and three oceans, which are brought directly from fishermen from all over the country. The geography of deliveries covers 17 regions of Russia, including the Astrakhan and Murmansk regions, Kamchatka and Khabarovsk territories, the republics of Karelia and Crimea.

    The markets have an open kitchen where you can cook any purchased fish and seafood for free, and there are also areas with cafes and restaurants. The gastronomic program is complemented by weekly performances by musicians – spectators are welcome from Friday to Sunday.

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    Please Note; This Information is Raw Content Directly from the Information Source. It is access to What the Source Is Stating and Does Not Reflect

    https: //vv.mos.ru/nevs/ite/151771073/

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Buyers at the Moscow-on-the-Wave markets purchased canned goods for SVO participants

    Translartion. Region: Russians Fedetion –

    Source: Moscow Government – Government of Moscow –

    At the fish markets “Moscow is on the wave” The charity event in support of the participants of the special military operation (SVO) has ended. It began on Defender of the Fatherland Day and lasted for a month.

    Visitors had the opportunity to purchase canned goods for the SVO fighters and leave them in a special basket. As a result of the campaign, about a thousand canned goods were collected: from tulka, sprat, mackerel, herring, cod liver and roe, as well as from other types of fish. This product is especially convenient in field conditions – canned goods are easy to transport and store, and they do not require containers.

    All products were transferred to project headquarters “Moscow Helps”. Here, volunteers prepare collected goods for further transportation to new and border territories of Russia.

    “City residents and city organizations bring various things to the headquarters. Including long-life food products, such as canned fish, as they did this time. Now it is very important to show that we can all unite in this support,” noted Alexandra Iskhakova, a volunteer at the Moscow Helps headquarters.

    The Moscow-on-the-Wave fish markets also offer a permanent ten percent discount for participants in the special military operation and their family members.

    Charity events aimed at collecting food aid are held regularly in Moscow. Thus, before the New Year holidays, city residents traditionally take part in the “Hanging Mandarin” campaign. In August last year, two “Give an Apple!” campaigns took place, during which buyers at Moscow fairs donated fresh fruit to charitable foundations.

    The Moscow-on-the-Wave fish market opened in the Kosino-Ukhtomsky district in November 2023, and in Mitino in September 2024. As Sergei Sobyanin reported earlier, they were visited last year more than one and a half million people, over a thousand tons of products were sold.

    The markets offer a wide range of fish and seafood from three oceans and 13 seas washing Russia. Residents and guests of the capital can buy fresh carp, chilled Murmansk salmon, red mullet on skewers, northern omul and whitefish in fresh-frozen and smoked form, lightly salted tugunok, Olyutor herring and much more.

    More information about the activities of the capital’s Department of Trade and Services is available in the official telegram channel.

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    Please Note; This Information is Raw Content Directly from the Information Source. It is access to What the Source Is Stating and Does Not Reflect

    https: //vv.mos.ru/nevs/ite/151775073/

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Interview with Peter Fegan, 4BC, Brisbance

    Source: Australian Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister for Industry

    Peter Fegan:

    It’s Labor’s $17 billion pledge. But is it enough to save the election? The Labor Party or the government has delivered its fourth Budget last night. Plenty of savings, but given the cost‑of‑living crisis, we’re in no position to bite the hand that could potentially feed us for the next 3 years, at least. Joining me on the line is the Treasurer, Jim Chalmers. Treasurer, it is always great to have your time on the programme.

    Jim Chalmers:

    Thanks for having me back on your show, Pete. Good morning.

    Fegan:

    $268 in tax cuts in the first year, which is 2026. That’s $538 in the second. You’ve conceded, Treasurer, that that is modest cuts. It equates to about $5 a week. You add in the Stage 3 tax cuts, that will be around $56 bucks a week. So, when you consider how much groceries, fuel, beer, health, childcare, aged care is; most Australians would say that $50 bucks doesn’t go very far at all.

    Chalmers:

    I understand that, Pete. I understand that there’s always an appetite to do more. My job is to make sure that we’re providing this cost‑of‑living relief in the most responsible way that we can. The tax cuts are an important part of that, that $50 a week in income taxes is all about helping people but so is strengthening Medicare because more bulk billing means less pressure on families.

    So are the energy rebates, the cheaper medicines, cutting student debt. There are a number of ways that we’re providing cost‑of‑living help in the Budget, but we’ve got to do that in the most responsible way. We know that there will always be calls to do more. We’re doing the most that we can afford to do for the time being.

    Fegan:

    Treasurer, I would argue what is missing from this Budget are tough decisions, serious structural reforms and addressing the elephant in the room. We know what that is, Treasurer. It’s spending. Now, there’s $40 billion set aside for decisions not yet announced. That means that the Prime Minister has another $40 billion up his sleeve to throw around during the election campaign. So, let’s just call this Budget what it is. It’s a Budget to win the election. Surely.

    Chalmers:

    I don’t agree with you, Pete. It’s a Budget to build the future and to help people with the cost of living and strengthen Medicare. Those are the 3 primary objectives of the Budget. It’s all about making our economy more resilient in the face of all this global economic uncertainty. That’s what’s motivated us here when it comes to this Budget.

    Now, when it comes to spending, about half of the new spending in the Budget is the tax cuts. A big proportion of the rest of it was already provisioned for in the mid‑year Budget update. We’ve been responsible, we’ve gone for what’s affordable and we’ve done that in the context where we have taken difficult decisions. There are billions of dollars in savings.

    There is much less debt this year in the Budget than when we came to office 3 years ago in terms of the $177 billion less debt this year. We are making good progress in the budget. We’re making especially good progress in the economy more broadly. We know that that doesn’t always immediately translate into how people are feeling and faring in the economy. That’s why the cost‑of‑living help is so important.

    Fegan:

    Migration. 260,000 new migrants will flood into Australia by the end of July, the majority of which will come into Australia. Now Treasurer, historically yes, migration does help fuel economy, we know that. But unfortunately, here in Australia we have a living crisis, we have a housing crisis.

    We have a major supply issue here in Queensland. You know that, you live in Logan. You know how bad supply is at the moment. Are you putting them up? Because I don’t know where 260,000 new migrants will go. I know that they’ll work. But we’re in a housing crisis. It doesn’t make sense to me.

    Chalmers:

    Two important things about that, Pete. Firstly, we’re investing $33 billion in building more homes.

    Fegan:

    But you haven’t built any yet though, Treasurer. That’s the issue. You haven’t built any new homes yet. That’s the big issue here. You can invest all your money, all the money you want. You can’t put them in camps until they’re built.

    Chalmers:

    We are building new homes. We’re making a very substantial investment in making sure that’s the case. Secondly, you refer to those migration numbers. Those migration numbers have actually been very substantially managed down from their peak after COVID. When Australia more or less shut down during COVID in the year or 2 after that, couple of years after that, there was a big rebound in the net overseas migration number spanning 2 governments.

    We’ve been able to manage that down to more normal levels. That is what you’re seeing in the budget. That number that you refer to is right, but it is much lower, very, very substantially lower than it was a couple of years ago.

    Fegan:

    Okay, Treasurer, this is an interesting one and I think all eyes will be on this when it comes to the election.

    Let’s talk energy.

    Okay, Treasurer, the Prime Minister and yourself and all your Ministers all maintain that energy prices are lower under a Labor government. So, why has the government, if that’s the case – if we are paying less for energy, why has the government spent $6.8 billion on energy subsidies to date? Is that not an abject failure of the last 3 years? And your energy policy, why give Australians another $150 bucks if, according to Labor, energy is affordable? I don’t understand it. I mean, if it is affordable, I don’t need the $150 bucks.

    Chalmers:

    This is another important way that we’re helping people with the cost of living. We know that in the last year in the official inflation data, we were able to get electricity prices down. That’s a good thing. That’s been a combination of rebates, but also the efforts that we’re making to introduce more cleaner and cheaper energy into the system.

    If you think about the independent experts from a body called AEMO, what they talk about is what’s pushing electricity prices up is actually the old parts of the system, the traditional parts of the system, becoming less and less reliable.

    We’re providing these energy rebates in the near term to take some of the sting out of these electricity bills while people are under cost‑of‑living pressure. At the same time, we’re introducing more cleaner and cheaper, more reliable energy into the system because that’s the best way to put downward pressure on energy prices over the medium and long term.

    Fegan:

    Yeah, there’s no. But there’s no funding for green energy. There’s no funding for net zero.

    Chalmers:

    That’s not true, Pete.

    Fegan:

    Well, there’s no extra funding. Is there, in this Budget? Is there extra investment in –

    Chalmers:

    Yeah, there’s some extra investment out of an innovation.

    Fegan:

    How much?

    Chalmers:

    For about one and a half billion, I think from memory.

    Fegan:

    But it’s not in Budget. Is it in Budget papers released?

    Chalmers:

    Yeah, it’s in the Budget papers. We’ve also recapitalised the Clean Energy Finance Corporation because that’s playing an important role as well, financing cleaner and cheaper energy.

    I accept your broader point. Electricity prices are a pressure on family budgets we’re seeing around the world. We’re not immune from that. The energy bill rebates are an important, responsible way that we take some of the edge off that while we introduce more cleaner and cheaper, and more reliable energy into the system.

    Fegan:

    Treasurer, why should Australians trust Anthony Albanese and Jim Chalmers for another 3 years?

    Chalmers:

    I think after the Coalition’s brain explosion on tax last night, the choice at the election is becoming absolutely crystal clear now. We’re helping people as a Labor government with the cost of living by cutting their taxes. Peter Dutton has an agenda of secret cuts which will make people worse off. Now, Peter Dutton wants to cut everything except people’s taxes, and that’s really the contest which was set up last night when Angus Taylor, quite bizarrely, said that he would oppose our cost‑of‑living help.

    What we’ve seen over the course of the last 3 years is every time we’ve tried to help people with the cost of living, our opponents have opposed that. Peter Dutton and Angus Taylor have both said the best predictor of future performance is past performance. They have opposed cost‑of‑living help; they’re opposing these cost‑of‑living tax cuts in the Budget last night.

    I think that sets up a very clear choice. If people want a Labor government helping with the cost of living, managing the budget responsibly, investing in building Australia’s future, they can choose that over Peter Dutton, who has secret cuts which will make people worse off, and that’s because he wants to cut everything except taxes.

    Fegan:

    Do you accept that Australians don’t trust you?

    Chalmers:

    I don’t necessarily accept that, Pete. I mean, that’s a judgement for people to make. I understand that, and it’s something that journalists and commentators can speculate about. What we did last night was keep faith with the Australian people and do justice to the progress and the sacrifices that they have made. Together as Australians, we’ve made a lot of progress in our economy. We’ve got –

    Fegan:

    But a trillion dollars in debt. A trillion dollars, though, Treasurer?

    Chalmers:

    It’s $177 billion this year lower than what it was when we came to office for this year. That’s a really important thing. You will read a lot of stuff in the papers about debt and deficits. Don’t forget, we delivered 2 surpluses, we shrunk the deficit, we got the debt down, we’re saving on interest costs.

    Fegan:

    But it’s still a trillion dollars. You grilled the former government on this. It’s still a trillion dollars. And I know it’s not all your fault, but it’s a trillion dollars. We’ve got kids that need to buy homes in 20 years’ time.

    Chalmers:

    That’s why we’re investing substantially in housing, $33 billion program. On the debt, don’t forget, we would have already had a trillion dollars of debt under our opponents. It’s $177 billion lower this year. I think that’s too easily dismissed and diminished the progress we’ve made in the budget. Same goes for the progress we made in the economy together as Australians.

    As I was saying a moment ago, we’ve got growth rebounding solidly in our economy: inflation down, real wages up, unemployment is low, interest rates have started to be cut, we’ve got the debt down. This is good progress, and we would be crazy to interrupt that progress with Peter Dutton’s secret cuts which would make Australians worse off.

    Fegan:

    What’s happening with the Coalition at the moment, Treasurer? Seems to be some rumblings. I hear or see reports yesterday that Peter Dutton had to lay down the law, that David Littleproud got pretty fired up.

    Chalmers:

    Yeah, they got fired up because basically the Coalition members and senators are forming an orderly queue to say that Angus Taylor’s not up to the job. It’s quite bizarre that Angus Taylor’s asking Australians to take him seriously when his own colleagues don’t. He’s been found out and he’s been found wanting.

    I think genuinely, it was a proper brain explosion we saw last night when he said, at a time when people are under cost‑of‑living pressures, they won’t support our tax cuts to help people meet the cost of living. I think that was a bizarre decision. I think it will come back to haunt him, and I think his colleagues will have a view about it behind the scenes.

    Fegan:

    Treasurer, you’re on the front page of every paper today, but can I just say congratulations to you because you are drinking out of a Brisbane Broncos mug. How good is that?

    Chalmers:

    I get a bit of feedback about that. Mostly from Dolphins, mostly from people –

    Fegan:

    Well, do you know what? You’re still a staunch. You’re still a staunch Bronco supporter. Right?

    Chalmers:

    Pick and stick. Absolutely.

    Fegan:

    Thank you.

    Chalmers:

    Broncos until I die, Pete.

    Fegan:

    Because I see that Peter Dutton has changed his tune a little bit. He’s now, well, Dolphins is in his electorate. A little bit of his electorate. Well, I don’t know.

    Chalmers:

    Right. I’m not sure about that. In fairness to him, I’m not sure about that. I’m certainly, I will always be a very enthusiastic supporter of the Brisbane Broncos. I still remember their first game in the comp in 1988 as a little tacker. I’m looking forward to watching the Battle of Brisbane on Friday night. Always a good contest.

    Fegan:

    Go the Broncos. Yeah, exactly. Go the Broncos. Good on you, Treasurer. Great to have your company this morning.

    Chalmers:

    Nice to talk to you again, Pete. All the best.

    Fegan:

    There he is, the Treasurer, Jim Chalmers.

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Employment – IPL fuel testers to strike over “unfair” omission from bonus scheme following failed mediation

    Source: Workers First Union

    Workers First Union members who work for Independent Petroleum Laboratory Limited (IPL) are set to strike for six days at the end of the month following an unsuccessful mediation session with the company over the omission of union members from a lucrative bonus scheme.
    Laboratory technicians who test fuels, biofuels and other industrial products for supply to airports and others in New Zealand are excluded from a bonus pay scheme that the company will only provide to non-union members, which illegally disadvantages Workers First members, according to Justin Wallace, Workers First Organiser.
    “This kind of situation is unfortunately common in the oil and gas industry,” said Mr Wallace. “Union members have had enough of the unfair disadvantage and voted to strike after many attempts to negotiate in good faith with the company.”
    Mr Wallace said the strike action could have significant implications, particularly for fuel and jet fuel supplies in New Zealand given IPL’s role as a key testing facility in the supply chain to major petrol stations and airports. Delays in laboratory testing at IPL and on-site at airports could slow the certification and release of these fuels, potentially leading to shortages or logistical challenges.
    The strike action is set to take place from March 31st and will last for six days between 12:01AM – 11:59PM on 31 March and 2-6 April. Channel Infrastructure, the owner of IPL, manages a critical 170-kilometre pipeline delivering diesel, petrol, and jet fuel to the Auckland and Northland markets, which constitutes 40% of New Zealand’s fuel demand.
    “Non-union colleagues are supporting our fight for fairness in the workplace – there’s no reason that workers should be presented with a false dichotomy between participating in a pay incentive scheme or negotiating pay increases collectively through regular bargaining,” said Mr Wallace.
    “These are highly experienced senior laboratory staff who are sick of being disadvantaged in the workplace and having their legitimate concerns dismissed by IPL.”
    “Only a very small number of workers are qualified to perform these testing duties, and industrial action is their last resort after exhausting all other options.”

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Employment – IPL fuel testers to strike over “unfair” omission from bonus scheme following failed mediation

    Source: Workers First Union

    Workers First Union members who work for Independent Petroleum Laboratory Limited (IPL) are set to strike for six days at the end of the month following an unsuccessful mediation session with the company over the omission of union members from a lucrative bonus scheme.
    Laboratory technicians who test fuels, biofuels and other industrial products for supply to airports and others in New Zealand are excluded from a bonus pay scheme that the company will only provide to non-union members, which illegally disadvantages Workers First members, according to Justin Wallace, Workers First Organiser.
    “This kind of situation is unfortunately common in the oil and gas industry,” said Mr Wallace. “Union members have had enough of the unfair disadvantage and voted to strike after many attempts to negotiate in good faith with the company.”
    Mr Wallace said the strike action could have significant implications, particularly for fuel and jet fuel supplies in New Zealand given IPL’s role as a key testing facility in the supply chain to major petrol stations and airports. Delays in laboratory testing at IPL and on-site at airports could slow the certification and release of these fuels, potentially leading to shortages or logistical challenges.
    The strike action is set to take place from March 31st and will last for six days between 12:01AM – 11:59PM on 31 March and 2-6 April. Channel Infrastructure, the owner of IPL, manages a critical 170-kilometre pipeline delivering diesel, petrol, and jet fuel to the Auckland and Northland markets, which constitutes 40% of New Zealand’s fuel demand.
    “Non-union colleagues are supporting our fight for fairness in the workplace – there’s no reason that workers should be presented with a false dichotomy between participating in a pay incentive scheme or negotiating pay increases collectively through regular bargaining,” said Mr Wallace.
    “These are highly experienced senior laboratory staff who are sick of being disadvantaged in the workplace and having their legitimate concerns dismissed by IPL.”
    “Only a very small number of workers are qualified to perform these testing duties, and industrial action is their last resort after exhausting all other options.”

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Notification of avian influenza and Vibrio parahaemolyticus infection

    Source: FairTrading New South Wales

    Key messages

    • From 1 April 2025, avian influenza and Vibrio parahaemolyticus infection will become notifiable conditions in Victoria.
    • Avian influenza in a person will become an urgent notifiable condition. Medical practitioners and pathology services must notify cases immediately (as soon as practicable, and in any case, within 24 hours) upon diagnosis to the Department of Health. Pathology services must also provide written notification within 5 working days.
    • Vibrio parahaemolyticus infection will become a routine notifiable condition for pathology services only. Pathology services must provide written notification of Vibrio parahaemolyticus detection or isolation in a clinical specimen to the Department of Health within 5 working days.
    • Avian influenza is a highly contagious viral infection of birds that can rarely affect people. Those who have had close or prolonged contact with infected birds or other animals or their contaminated environments are at highest risk of infection.
    • Vibrio parahaemolyticus infection most commonly presents as acute gastroenteritis associated with consumption of raw and undercooked seafood.

    What is the issue?

    The Public Health and Wellbeing Act 2008 requires that prescribed conditions and micro-organisms are notified to the Department of Health. This law exists to monitor, prevent and control the occurrence of infectious diseases and other specified conditions to protect the Victorian community from further illness.

    From 1 April 2025, avian influenza will become an urgent notifiable condition and Vibrio parahaemolyticus infection will become a routine notifiable condition for both medical practitioners and pathology services in Victoria.

    Making these conditions notifiable enables public health response actions to be initiated more promptly and facilitates the collection of more comprehensive and accurate surveillance data.

    Avian influenza, commonly referred to as ‘bird flu’, is a contagious infection of birds, caused by multiple avian influenza viruses. Wild birds are considered the natural host for these viruses. Sometimes these viruses spill over from wild birds into domestic bird populations causing disease. Several outbreaks have previously occurred in Australia among commercial flocks of birds. In May 2024, Australia reported its first human case of avian influenza H5N1 in a returned overseas traveller.

    Vibrio parahaemolyticus is a bacterium found in marine waters that most commonly causes acute gastroenteritis with watery diarrhoea, abdominal cramps, nausea, vomiting, fever and headache. Illness is primarily associated with consumption of raw or undercooked seafood, particularly oysters and other shellfish. In Australia, several multi-jurisdictional outbreaks linked to locally grown oysters have occurred over the past ten years, with significant human health, economic and international trade impact. Less commonly Vibrio parahaemolyticus can also cause wound infection when sea water contaminates an open wound.

    Who is at risk?

    Most people are not at risk of avian influenza, as the viruses do not spread easily from birds to people. People who have close or prolonged unprotected contact with infected birds or animals or their contaminated environments are at highest risk of infection.

    Although limited human-to-human transmission of avian influenza viruses may have occurred in some instances, sustained human-to-human transmission has not been identified to date.

    People cannot be infected with avian influenza through eating fully cooked poultry or eggs, even in areas with an outbreak.

    Vibrio parahaemolyticus infection can infect individuals of any age. Risks factors for developing severe disease include underlying chronic illness, being immunocompromised, consumption of antibiotics and medications that reduce stomach acid levels.

    Vibrio parahaemolyticus does not usually spread from person to person, however, person-to-person transmission is possible if there is poor personal hygiene.

    Diagnosis

    Diagnosis of avian influenza is confirmed using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for avian influenza viruses, on nasopharyngeal and throat swabs. As sample collection may induce coughing, where avian influenza is suspected swabs should be collected in a negative pressure room if available and using appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE).

    Not everyone with symptoms of influenza needs to be tested for or notified as having suspected avian influenza.

    A suspected case of avian influenza requires both clinical evidence and epidemiological evidence. Epidemiological evidence may include:

    • close contact with a probable or confirmed human avian influenza case
    • exposure to birds, bird carcasses, or to environments contaminated by bird faeces, in an area with suspected or confirmed avian influenza infections in birds or other animals
    • consumption of raw or undercooked poultry products from an area with suspected or confirmed avian influenza infections in birds
    • close contact with a confirmed avian influenza infected animal other than birds (for example, cat or pig)
    • handling samples suspected of containing avian influenza virus in a laboratory or other setting.

    For more information refer to the Communicable Diseases Network Australia Surveillance Case Definition – Avian influenzaExternal Link.

    Diagnosis of Vibrio parahaemolyticus infection relies on laboratory detection of Vibrio parahaemolyticus by nucleic acid testing or isolation of the bacterium from an appropriate clinical specimen. For more information refer to the Communicable Diseases Network Australia Surveillance Case DefinitionExternal Link.

    Confirmed cases of Vibrio parahaemolyticus infection are designated based only on definitive laboratory evidence and are therefore required to be notified by pathology services.

    Recommendations

    For medical practitioners

    • From 1 April 2025, medical practitioners must notify all patients with suspected or confirmed avian influenza to the Department of Health immediately (as soon as practicable and within 24 hours) upon diagnosis by telephone on 1300 651 160 (24/7). Notifying medical practitioners will be connected to the appropriate Local Public Health Unit.
    • Seek laboratory confirmation urgently for all suspected cases of avian influenza. All suspected cases should be discussed with the relevant Local Public Health Unit who can provide advice on testing and coordinate with the laboratory.
    • All samples should be sent for urgent testing at the Victorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory (VIDRL). Record relevant clinical details, suspected diagnosis and risk factors on the request form.
    • Consider the need for contact management of patients with avian influenza. This may include post-exposure prophylaxis in eligible high-risk contacts. For further advice, refer to an infectious disease specialist or contact your Local Public Health Unit (after hours contact via 1300 651 160).
    • Further information about the notification process and the Public Health and Wellbeing legislation are available on the Notifiable infectious diseases, conditions and micro-organisms page.

    For pathology services

    • From 1 April 2025, pathology services must notify any isolation or detection of avian influenza (subtype of Influenza A) to the Department of Health immediately (as soon as practicable and within 24 hours) upon diagnosis by telephone on 1300 651 160 (24/7). Notifying pathology services will be connected to the appropriate Local Public Health Unit. Pathology services must also follow up with written notifications within 5 working days.
    • From 1 April 2025, pathology services must provide written notification of any isolation or detection of Vibrio parahaemolyticus within five working days to the Department of Health by electronic laboratory report (ELR) or by faxing the laboratory report to 1300 651 170.

    More information

    For more information, please contact the Department of Health on 1300 651 160 (24/7).

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-Evening Report: Leak of US military plans on Signal is a classic case of ‘shadow IT’. It shows why security systems need to be easy to use

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Toby Murray, Professor of Cybersecurity, School of Computing and Information Systems, The University of Melbourne

    Yesterday, The Atlantic magazine revealed an extraordinary national security blunder in the United States. Top US government officials had discussed plans for a bombing campaign in Yemen against Houthi rebels in a Signal group chat which inadvertently included The Atlantic’s editor in chief, Jeffrey Goldberg.

    This is hardly the first time senior US government officials have used non-approved systems to handle classified information. In 2009, the then US Secretary of State Hilary Clinton fatefully decided to accept the risk of storing her emails on a server in her basement because she preferred the convenience of accessing them using her personal BlackBerry.

    Much has been written about the unprecedented nature of this latest incident. Reporting has suggested the US officials involved may have also violated federal laws that require any communication, including text messages, about official acts to be properly preserved.

    But what can we learn from it to help us better understand how to design secure systems?

    A classic case of ‘shadow IT’

    Signal is regarded by many cybersecurity experts as one of the world’s most secure messaging apps. It has become an established part of many workplaces, including government.

    Even so, it should never be used to store and send classified information. Governments, including in the US, define strict rules for how national security classified information needs to be handled and secured. These rules prohibit the use of non-approved systems, including commercial messaging apps such as Signal plus cloud services such as Dropbox or OneDrive, for sending and storing classified data.

    The sharing of military plans on Signal is a classic case of what IT professionals call “shadow IT”.

    It refers to the all-too-common practice of employees setting up parallel IT infrastructure for business purposes without the approval of central IT administrators.

    This incident highlights the potential for shadow IT to create security risks.

    Government agencies and large organisations employ teams of cybersecurity professionals whose job it is to manage and secure the organisation’s IT infrastructure from cyber threats. At a minimum, these teams need to track what systems are being used to store sensitive information. Defending against sophisticated threats requires constant monitoring of IT systems.

    In this sense, shadow IT creates security blind spots: systems that adversaries can breach while going undetected, not least because the IT security team doesn’t even know these systems exist.

    It’s possible that part of the motivation for the US officials in question using shadow IT systems in this instance might have been avoiding the scrutiny and record-keeping requirements of the official channels. For example, some of the messages in the Signal group chat were set to disappear after one week, and some after four.

    However, we have known for at least a decade that employees also build shadow IT systems not because they are trying to weaken their organisation’s cybersecurity. Instead, a common motivation is that by using shadow IT systems many employees can get their work done faster than when using official, approved systems.

    Usability is key

    The latest incident highlights an important but often overlooked lesson in cybersecurity: whether a security system is easy to use has an outsized impact on the degree to which it helps improve security.

    To borrow from US Founding Father Benjamin Franklin, we might say that a system designer who prioritises security at the expense of usability will produce a system that is neither usable nor secure.

    The belief that to make a system more secure requires making it harder to use is as widespread as it is wrong. The best systems are the ones that are both highly secure and highly usable.

    The reason is simple: a system that is secure yet difficult to use securely will invariably be used insecurely, if at all. Anyone whose inbox auto-complete has caused them to send an email to the wrong person will understand this risk. It likely also explains how The Atlantic’s editor-in-chief might have been mistakenly added by US officials to the Signal group chat.

    While we cannot know for certain, reporting suggests Signal displayed the name of Jeffrey Goldberg to the chat group only as “JG”. Signal doesn’t make it easy to confirm the identity of someone in a group chat, except by their phone number or contact name.

    In this sense, Signal gives relatively few clues about the identities of people in chats. This makes it relatively easy to inadvertently add the wrong “JG” from one’s contact list to a group chat.

    Signal is one of the most secure messaging apps, but should never be used to store and send classified information.
    Ink Drop/Shutterstock

    A highly secure – and highly usable – system

    Fortunately, we can have our cake and eat it too. My own research shows how.

    In collaboration with Australia’s Defence Science and Technology Group, I helped develop what’s known as the Cross Domain Desktop Compositor. This device allows secure access to classified information while being easier to use than traditional solutions.

    It is easier to use because it allows users to connect to the internet. At the same time, it keeps sensitive data physically separate – and therefore secure – but allows it to be displayed alongside internet applications such as web browsers.

    One key to making this work was employing mathematical reasoning to prove the device’s software provided rock-solid security guarantees. This allowed us to marry the flexibility of software with the strong hardware-enforced security, without introducing additional vulnerability.

    Where to from here?

    Avoiding security incidents such as this one requires people following the rules to keep everyone secure. This is especially true when handling classified information, even if doing so requires more work than setting up shadow IT workarounds.

    In the meantime, we can avoid the need for people to work around the rules by focusing more research on how to make systems both secure and usable.

    Toby Murray receives funding from the Department of Defence. He is Director of the Defence Science Institute, which is funded by the Victorian, Tasmanian and Commonwealth Governments. He previously worked for the Department of Defence.

    ref. Leak of US military plans on Signal is a classic case of ‘shadow IT’. It shows why security systems need to be easy to use – https://theconversation.com/leak-of-us-military-plans-on-signal-is-a-classic-case-of-shadow-it-it-shows-why-security-systems-need-to-be-easy-to-use-253036

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-Evening Report: PNG’s Marape and NZ’s Luxon sign new partnership marking 50 years

    RNZ News

    The prime ministers of New Zealand and Papua New Guinea have signed a new statement of partnership marking 50 years of bilateral relations between the two countries.

    The document — which focuses on education, trade, security, agriculture and fisheries — was signed by Christopher Luxon and James Marape at the Beehive in Wellington last night.

    It will govern the relationship between the two countries through until 2029 and replaces the last agreement signed by Marape in 2021 with then-Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern.

    Marking the signing, Luxon announced $1 million would be allocated in response to Papua New Guinea’s aspirations to strengthen public sector institutions.

    “That funding will be able to support initiatives like strengthen cooperation between disaster preparedness institutions and also exchanging expertise in the governance of state owned enterprises in particular,” Luxon said.

    In his response Marape acknowledged the long enduring relationship between the government and peoples of New Zealand and Papua New Guinea.

    He said the new statement of partnership was an important blueprint on how the two countries would progress their relationship into the future.

    “Papua New Guinea brings to the table, as far as our relationship is concerned, our close proximity to Asia. We straddle the Pacific and Southeast Asia, we have an affinity to as much as our own affinity with our relations in the Pacific,” Marape said.

    “Our dual presence at APEC continues to ring [sic] home the fact that we belong to a family of nations and we work back to back on many fronts.”

    Meeting Peters
    Today, Marape will meet with Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters and leader of the opposition Chris Hipkins.

    Later in the week, Marape is scheduled to travel to Hamilton where he will meet with the NZ Papua New Guinea Business Council and with Papua New Guinea scholarship recipients at Waikato University.

    James Marape is accompanied by his spouse Rachael Marape and a ministerial delegation including Foreign Minister Justin Tkatchenko, Trade Minister Richard Maru, Minister for Livestock Seki Agisa and Higher Education Minister Kinoka Feo.

    This is Marape’s first official visit to New Zealand following his re-election as prime minister in the last national elections in 2022.

    According to the PNG government, the visit signals a growing relationship between the two countries, especially in trade and investment, cultural exchange, and the newly-added Recognised Seasonal Employer (RSE) scheme that New Zealand has extended to Papua New Guineans to work in Aotearoa.

    This article is republished under a community partnership agreement with RNZ.

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Speech to Project Auckland Luncheon

    Source: New Zealand Government

    Good afternoon, everyone. Thanks, Murray, for that introduction.  

    It’s a pleasure to be speaking with you here in New Zealand’s capital city of growth, at this launch of the Project Auckland report.  

    Can I start by acknowledging my parliamentary colleague Hon Simeon Brown. He is unquestionably the biggest advocate for Auckland I know – and is a staunch advocate for you all around the Cabinet table.  

    I also want to acknowledge Project Auckland Editor Fran O’Sullivan, Deputy Mayor Desley Simpson, and my former parliamentary colleague and boss Simon Bridges.  

    While I am a boy from Lower Hutt, I want to reassure you that I know and love this city, having lived here for two years, having many friends who live here, and am at the moment almost a weekly visitor. 

    Auckland is critical to New Zealand’s future. We are not going to be successful in growing our economy if we don’t think carefully about how we enable Auckland, as our largest and most important city, to grow and thrive. 

    That’s why government is investing heavily into transport in Auckland, through new Roads of National Significance, new busways, and commuter rail. 

    Without question, the largest of these planned investments is a second harbour crossing.  

    In fact, it will be one of the most expensive infrastructure investments in New Zealand history.  

    Our existing bridge is old, and even with the clip-on lanes, it’s expected to struggle with forecast increases in demand.   

    Despite the daunting cost, and the other challenges that come with the project, advancing an additional harbour crossing is a priority for this Government.  

    Right now, there is a barge in the harbour undertaking geotechnical, environmental, and utilities investigations of the Harbour floor – the first-time studies of this kind have been done.  

    NTZA are about to kick off early market soundings on this project, largely to help us make the decision every Aucklander is waiting for: bridge or tunnel. We expect to make that decision mid-2026. 

    Being realistic, this project won’t be built for a while yet – but Auckland doesn’t need to wait that long to experience a transformational transport project.  

    Everyone in this room knows the potential City Rail Link has to enable the growth Auckland needs. 

    Once open next year, CRL will double Auckland’s rail capacity and reduce congestion across the city, enabling Aucklanders to get to where they want to go faster. 

    It is critical for the city’s future that we take advantage of CRL and ensure that the maximum benefits are felt by Aucklanders.  

    We must focus high density, mixed-use developments around CRL stations – with as many jobs, houses, services and amenities within walking distance as possible.  

    This approach is known as transit-oriented development, and has been adopted by the world’s best and most liveable cities – think Stockholm, Copenhagen, Hong Kong, Tokyo, and Singapore. 

    Cities that embrace transit orientated development consistently outperform those that don’t across multiple metrics: they experience increases in productivity, lower unemployment, higher population growth, increased availability of homes, and more stable rents. 

    And with CRL, we have a once in a generation chance to embrace this in Auckland. 
     

    Consent decline 

    This is why I was so frustrated last week to see a resource consent application to build a $100m office building on K Road – within walking distance of the new CRL station – was denied by commissioners.   

    Frankly, this decision made me feel physically ill.  

    How can it possibly be that an 11-story building, which includes retail spaces and food and beverage stores, alongside office and commercial spaces for more than 400 people, is turned down in the centre of New Zealand’s biggest city? 

    The site it is currently planned to be on is a gravel pit. You heard that correctly. Our current planning laws are so fundamentally broken that a gravel pit in the CBD of Auckland is unable to be developed into a new office building.  

    The commissioners’ report said “The principal concern for the board is the scale of the development.” 

    Which might be more understandable if that was said about a development in a small regional town, but is astounding when there is a 20 story building within 100 metres.     

    Putting it simply, and excuse the RMA language, the commissioners when declining this application concluded that the adverse effects related to built form and appearance, streetscape, and historic heritage had not been sufficiently avoided such that the effects on the environment were considered ‘more than minor’.  

    This is precisely why we are scrapping the RMA, and replacing it with a radically more enabling system predicated on property rights. As you will have hopefully seen, I announced the architecture for our new system earlier this week.  

    A number of the changes we are progressing would have likely led to this K-Road development being approved rather than declined.  

    Our planned standardised zoning approach will help us move away from considering matters such as built form and appearance, or streetscape.  

    It will be clear what you can build and where, with fewer restrictions encouraging increased creativity in our built form – likely improving the look of our cities.    

    What I want to see in our new planning system is that development like this, due to its proximity to rapid transit and the central city, would be able to proceed without the need to gain approval at all – instead proceeding as a permitted activity through a standardised zone.  

    The other, more technical change we are proposing to make is the removal of what is known as non-complying activity status. The RMA states that a consent can only be granted for a non-complying activity if the adverse effects of the activity are minor, or the activity will not be contrary to objectives and policies of a plan. 

    In layman’s terms, this creates a barrier to some of these larger projects, with a much higher bar for approval, which sometimes is insurmountable.   

    This K-Road development was one of these non-complying activities. Remember that McDonalds in Wanaka that was declined a few weeks ago? Also a non-complying activity. That Southland windfarm that was declined last week? You guessed it: non-complying activity.  

    8-10% of all resource consent applications every year are for non-complying activities – and therefore face this sometimes impossibly high-bar.  

    By removing non-complying activities in our new system, alongside narrowing the effects considered in the planning system, we will making it substantially easier for these big projects to get approval.  
     

    PC 78 

    Moving on from K-Road – another issue that has been causing significant uncertainty for Auckland Council, as well as Aucklanders, has been the ongoing saga with it’s current plan change process, known as PC 78.  

    Auckland Council has been progressing PC 78 since mid-2022. This was the vehicle that was intended to implement the National Policy Statement on Urban Development – more commonly known as the NPS-UD, and the Medium Density Residential Standards – more commonly known as the MDRS. Apologies for the acronym soup. 

     

    The idea was that the MDRS, which enabled more density in the suburbs, and the NPS-UD, which enabled more density around CBDs and rapid transit, were both meant to be adopted by councils quickly – and the last Government gave them new planning tools to achieve this.   

    This, however, did not quite pan out. Fast forward to today, years after these were introduced, Auckland Council are still going through their plan change process to implement them. 

    In fairness to them, there have been significant challenges along the way. Cyclone Gabrielle and flooding events, and the change in Government has now made the progress of PC 78 tricky, to say the least.  

    I think Mayor Brown put it best when he called the current situation “a bit like RMA gymnastics”. 

    Following the floods, Auckland Council has seen the need to address a number of new natural hazard areas prone to flooding.  

    Unfortunately, and frankly, annoyingly, the plan change process they had to use for PC 78, does not allow downzoning. It wasn’t envisaged at the time that councils would need to do anything other than upzoning using this process, and now they are stuck.  

    The other issue is the light rail corridor. Auckland Council left this blank in PC 78, anticipating new station location announcements, which obviously did not come, as we won the election, and scrapped this wasteful project as promised. 

    We also have also communicated changes to the rules around the MDRS, as we campaigned on, therefore changing Auckland Council’s approach to PC 78 yet again. 

    These things have left Auckland Council in a very confusing situation not entirely of their own making – although I do want to say, that if they had they delivered this plan change on the timeframes originally required of them, a number of these issues would be much easier to manage now.  

    With us about to introduce a new RMA system, and this having dragged on for frankly far too long already, we want Auckland Council to bank some quick-wins for density and development now. Aucklanders have waited for too long.  

    That’s why I can confirm today that I have changed my legal  “direction”, made under the RMA, on Auckland Council on the timing and sequencing of decisions on PC 78. 

    This change will bring forward decisions on the city centre, by ten months from the previously required date of March 2026 to May 2025.  

    This will almost immediately support the enablement of thousands of dwellings and significant development potential in the heart of Auckland – where basically everyone accepts this kind of growth is critical.  

    We are able to do this because the city centre parts of PC 78 are discrete from the rest of the changes and have been through submissions and hearings already.  

    Locking in this part of the plan change as soon as possible is a massive win for our biggest city, and a massive win for economic growth.  

    For the time being, the remainder of PC 78 will still need to be completed by March 2026 as per the law.  

    I note that Auckland Council, in their submission on the Resource Management (Consenting and Other System Changes) Amendment Bill, which is currently before the Environment Select Committee, have asked for changes to enable the immediate withdrawal of the remaining parts of PC 78.  

    As this Bill is currently before Select Committee, and due to come back to Parliament later in the year, I am unable to provide comment on whether these suggestions will be incorporated.  

    However, I can confirm this is something that is being considered as part of the Committee’s process, and I’ll have more to say on this in due course.  

    I am grateful to the work of Mayor Brown and his council in advancing housing and urban outcomes for our great city of Auckland.  

    In my experience, Mayor Brown has been steadfast in his support for sensible density in the city centre, in Auckland’s metro-centres, and near key transport connections. I want to thank him for his leadership, and for bringing sense back into the density debate in Auckland.  

    This situation has without a doubt been the most complex I have had to deal with as a Minister. If anything, it underscores the urgent need for our replacement planning system.  

    Aucklanders shouldn’t need a PhD in planning or a team of lawyers to understand the progress of a major zoning change going on in their backyards. Our new system will have plans that are much more streamlined and simple, clearly communicating what Kiwis can do on their own property, without the years and years of backwards and forwards.  
     

    Conclusion  

    In conclusion, I want to repeat what I have said in my column in the Project Auckland report we are all here to launch today:  

    Auckland has a bright future. Whenever I visit Auckland, I get a palpable sense of opportunity knocking. Auckland isn’t waiting, it’s getting on with the mission of growth. It is bursting at the seams with opportunities — now, it is the responsibility of all of us to help make it happen.  

    Thank you – I will now take your questions.  

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: New fines for fisheries offences come into force

    Source: New Zealand Government

    Fisheries offences will be subject to a broader range of penalties to ensure the punishment fits the crime under regulatory changes that come into effect on April 10, Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones says.

    “Until now, the only option to deal with some fisheries offences by recreational and commercial fishers has been prosecution, which can take a lot of time and resources and doesn’t always fairly reflect the level of offending.

    “The new infringement offences mean Fishery Officers will be able to issue fines that are more proportionate to the level of offending, removing unnecessary cost and burden on the court system.”

    The new infringement fees range from $200 to $500 depending on the offending.

    “By fitting the punishment to the crime, we can free up the system to better deal with more serious offending. Make no mistake, fishers who break the rules will face the consequences and prosecution remains on the table where appropriate.”

    New infringement offences will also apply for breaches of bylaws made under customary fishing regulations with fees ranging from $250 to $500.

    Other regulatory changes coming into force on April 10 include allowing spearfishing by commercial fishers, and the use of underwater breathing apparatus (UBA) for harvesting scallops.

    “Consumers here and around the world prize New Zealand’s seafood for its high quality and sustainability, so it makes good sense to allow selective methods like spearfishing.”

    Commercial spearfishing will be allowed in most waters around the South Island and lower North Island.

    “While most areas are currently closed to scallop fishing, including all of the commercially fished scallop beds, the provision of UBA for commercial scallop-gathering provides a more selective harvesting method if the fishery is reopened in the future. This is about future-proofing the rules with sustainability at the core,” Mr Jones says.

    Summary of the changes to offences and penalties:

    New infringement offences

    • A fee of $400 for most breaches of recordkeeping requirements (under the Fisheries (Recordkeeping) Regulations 1990).
    • A fee of $200 for failing to respond to notifications (issued pursuant to regulation 44 of the Fisheries (Reporting) Regulations 2017). This is when Fisheries New Zealand asks a fisher to confirm or correct information that has been provided for the purpose of ensuring quality and accuracy of data received from commercial fishers.
    • Two infringements for failure to use or apply seabird mitigation: a fee of $500 for offences relating to failure to use or apply a seabird mitigation measure, and a fee of $250 for breaches of technical specifications.
    • Breaches of bylaws that are made under three sets of customary fishing regulations will become infringement offences. Two different fees will apply:
      • $250 for offences that involve taking or possessing more than the daily limit of a species to which a bylaw applies, but not more than two times that daily limit; and
      • $500 for all other offences.
    • Specific offence and penalty provisions for failure to comply with conditions on a fish receiver’s licence with a fine not exceeding $20,000.
    • An offence provision for failure to comply with administrative requirements (under Regulation 7(4) of the Fisheries (South-East Area Commercial Fishing) Regulations 1986). This regulation sets out tagging requirements for commercially caught rock lobster in the Otago fishery and sets a new offence provision of a fine not exceeding $20,000 for failure to meet tagging and labelling requirements.

    Other changes

    Further information about the changes can be found on MPI’s website.

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Mid-Canterbury travellers face delays at Ealing, north of the Rangitata River Bridge, SH1 from next week

    Source: New Zealand Transport Agency

    People who travel between Ashburton and Rangitata in Mid-Canterbury will need to build in extra time throughout April, says NZ Transport Agency Waka Kotahi (NZTA).

    A roading contractor has become available at short notice, hence notifying people less than a week out, says NZTA.

    “We apologise for the lack of forewarning, but given the availability, we hope to make the most of this late summer sealing opportunity,” says Chris Chambers, Maintenance Contract Manager for NZTA in Mid Canterbury.

    From Monday, 31 March to the end of April, a road sealing team will repair a section of highway at the intersection of Withells Road to the west and Ealing Road to the east. There will be no work over the Easter Weekend or public holidays with crews restoring the site to two lanes at midday on Thursday, 17 April.

    Temporary traffic signals and Stop/Go will control traffic movements on the single available lane during daytime hours – 7 am to 6 pm, says Mr Chambers. However closer to the time of surfacing Stop/Go is also likely to be implemented over night to protect the surface prior to final sealing.

    “Drivers of light vehicles can take the alternative inland route between Hinds and Rangitata, SH79, to avoid having to queue,” says Mr Chambers. Otherwise, they may face delays of up to an hour. (See map for inland route below).

    Northbound drivers of light vehicles are strongly encouraged to take Scenic Route 72 (the Geraldine-Arundel Road) from Winchester into Geraldine then rejoin SH1 at Hinds or further north.

    Traffic control may be used at the single lane Upper Orari Bridge to ensure people are not delayed for long on the alternate route. SH79 has been re-sealed in recent weeks so will be suitable for all traffic by 31 March.

    Heavy vehicles

    SH1 drivers of heavy vehicles/ HPMV are requested to remain on SH1 given the fragile state of Scenic Route 72 due to flood damage.

    The section of SH1 being repaired was part of a larger reseal in May 2024. Unfortunately, only some sections of this work provided a lasting seal hence this re-work.

    NZTA thanks all drivers for planning their journeys around this section of work and taking the inland route whenever possible.

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-Evening Report: Protecting salmon farming at the expense of the environment – another step backwards for Australia’s nature laws

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Phillipa C. McCormack, Future Making Fellow, Environment Institute, University of Adelaide

    A bill introduced to parliament this week, if passed, would limit the government’s power to reconsider certain environment approvals when an activity is harming the environment.

    It fulfils Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s promise last month to introduce new laws to allow salmon farming to continue in Tasmania’s Macquarie Harbour. This salmon farming is currently mooted for reconsideration.

    There’s no doubt Australia’s nature laws need reform. The latest review found “Australians do not trust that the EPBC Act is delivering for the environment, for business or for the community”.

    But stopping the government from reconsidering a past decision is no way to fix these flaws. Reconsidering decisions is necessary if new evidence shows the activity is causing much more harm to nature, or a different kind of harm, than anticipated.

    Salmon farming in Macquarie Harbour

    Salmon have been farmed in Macquarie Harbour for almost 40 years, but activity has increased over the past decade.

    In 2012, Tasmania’s Department of Primary Industries sought approval to expand farming in the harbour, despite possible impacts on threatened species and the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area.

    But then-Environment Minister, Tony Bourke, declared no further consideration was needed and the action could proceed, because the proposal was not
    a controlled action”. Under the Act, a controlled action is any activity likely to impact on a matter of national environmental significance, such as a threatened species. A project or development deemed a controlled action then requires approval from the environment minister.

    However, Bourke’s decision was subject to conditions – most importantly, to ensure no significant impacts to the Maugean skate.

    In late 2023, Environment Minister Tanya Plibersek received a series of requests to reconsider Bourke’s 2012 decision.

    New evidence comes to light

    The power to request a reconsideration is available to anyone. If substantial new information justifies it, the minister may revoke the original decision and make a new one.

    In the Macquarie Harbour case, these reconsideration requests relied on scientific studies completed after 2012. One highlighted the skate’s vulnerability to changing water conditions. Another released last month showed a strong correlation between more intense salmon farming and increased extinction risk for the skate.

    Plibersek has not made a decision yet. However, documents her office released under Freedom of Information laws show new evidence. This evidence supports a declaration that salmon farming in Macquarie Harbour should be reconsidered. That could trigger a full review of salmon farming in the Harbour.

    However, the bill Labor has introduced would strip the minister’s powers to reconsider the earlier decision.

    Prime minister promises law change to protect salmon farms, February 2025 (ABC News)

    What does the new bill propose?

    On Monday a government spokesperson said:

    This bill is very specific – it’s a minor change, with extremely strict criteria – focused on giving Tasmanian workers certainty while government investments protect the Maugean Skate. The existing laws apply to everything else, including all new proposals for coal, gas, and land clearing.

    But we disagree. The bill describes the circumstances in which the minister can reconsider a decision. These are cases (such as Macquarie Harbour) where an activity is allowed to proceed without full assessment and approval, in a “particular manner”. The “particular manner” must include complying with a state or territory management arrangement. For example, the salmon farmers have to comply with a Tasmanian government plan for Macquarie Harbour. Finally, these activities must be currently underway, and ongoing in that way, for at least five years.

    It is not uncommon for “particular manner” decisions to require compliance with state or territory management arrangements. So the new legislation will catch more than just the Macquarie Harbour project in the “net”.

    For instance, our quick search of the EPBC Act portal revealed a similar particular manner decision. This means that, after five years of operation, this second decision will also be immune from challenge.

    There would be more where that came from. The bill will not only protect salmon farming in Macquarie Harbour.

    What’s more, reconsideration powers have been used sparingly – there seems no reason to limit their use further. A search of the EPBC Act public portal reveals only 52 reconsideration requests since the Act began, averaging just two a year. Many of these requests were made by proponents, disgruntled with a “controlled action” decision made in relation to their own projects.

    One bad bill after another

    This may sound familiar, because Labor’s bill is similar to Liberal Senator Richard Colbeck’s private bill proposed in December, which also concerned protecting salmon farming jobs in Macquarie Harbour.

    The Senate’s Environment and Communications Legislation Committee made a single recommendation on that bill: that it not be passed.

    The majority report (from Labor, Greens and Independent senators) provided sensible reasons for recommending the bill be abandoned. It noted the power to request a reconsideration already has “appropriate safeguards”.

    Furthermore, these “safeguards strike an appropriate balance by providing industry with confidence and certainty that a decision made will not be easily reversed, while allowing decisions to be reconsidered should new and significant information relating to the decision arise”.

    Just four months later, these remain compelling reasons for maintaining the power to reconsider decisions.

    We don’t have time to go backwards

    This amendment will not achieve the comprehensive reforms the EPBC Act needs. In fact, it will actively undermine these goals. It has been rushed through after years of effort to improve nature laws, on the eve of an election, in a marginal electorate, and has been put to Parliament on the day of a budget lockup.

    Despite removing this scrutiny, the bill is unlikely to resolve the controversy in Macquarie Harbour.




    Read more:
    Labor’s dumping of Australia’s new nature laws means the environment is shaping as a key 2025 election issue


    Phillipa McCormack receives funding from the Australian Research Council, the National Environmental Science Program, Natural Hazards Research Australia, Green Adelaide and the ACT Government. She is a member of the National Environmental Law Association and an affiliated member of the Centre for Marine Socioecology.

    Justine Bell-James receives funding from the Australian Research Council, the Queensland Government, and the National Environmental Science Program. She is a Director of the National Environmental Law Association and a member of the Wentworth Group of Concerned Scientists.

    ref. Protecting salmon farming at the expense of the environment – another step backwards for Australia’s nature laws – https://theconversation.com/protecting-salmon-farming-at-the-expense-of-the-environment-another-step-backwards-for-australias-nature-laws-252814

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI USA: Ranking Members Padilla, Morelle Secure Reversal on Damaging Plan to Close Federal Buildings With Congressional Offices

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Alex Padilla (D-Calif.)

    Ranking Members Padilla, Morelle Secure Reversal on Damaging Plan to Close Federal Buildings With Congressional Offices

    Padilla and Morelle: “We are relieved that GSA and DOGE have heeded our strong objections and reversed course”
    WASHINGTON, D.C. — Today, U.S. Senator Alex Padilla (D-Calif.), Ranking Member of the Senate Committee on Rules and Administration, and U.S. Representative Joe Morelle (N.Y.-25), Ranking Member of the Committee on House Administration, followed up on their March 7 letter to the General Services Administration (GSA), welcoming its abandonment of joint efforts with the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) to cancel leases or sell federal buildings that host Congressional or other Legislative Branch offices. The Members continued to press GSA on their reckless efforts to close or sell off hundreds of other federal facilities at the direction of President Trump and Elon Musk and the indiscriminate firings of GSA Congressional support and regional management staff.
    “Members of Congress utilize offices across the country to carry out their constitutional duties within their home states and districts,” wrote the lawmakers. “We reiterate that closing facilities that host Congressional offices and forcing them to relocate would directly interfere with Congress’s constitutional duties, pose significant security risks, and cause disruption to essential constituent services. We are relieved that GSA and DOGE have heeded our strong objections and reversed course.”
    Trump’s GSA failed to respond to the lawmakers’ March 7 letter and still refuses to be transparent or accountable to Congressional oversight over these potential plans to cancel leases and sell off federally owned facilities.
    “This lack of responsiveness to Congress is unacceptable. GSA is funded and overseen by Congress and is accountable to the American people and their duly elected representatives in Congress,” wrote the lawmakers. “A lack of transparency, combined with uncoordinated and chaotic policy announcements and execution, is the opposite of ‘government efficiency.’”
    The lawmakers condemned the sweeping firings of GSA staff for entire regions and of GSA’s Congressional Support Program staff, who are critical to establish and maintain in-state Congressional offices. While the plans to sell off federally owned buildings in the Legislative Branch have been called off, these offices need a strong workforce to maintain essential operations.
    “DOGE and GSA have continued their indiscriminate firing of GSA Congressional Support staff and regional building management staff, leaving dozens of federal buildings with Congressional tenants without adequate support,” continued the lawmakers. “DOGE and GSA should similarly reverse course on these untargeted and short-sighted staff reductions that risk disrupting congressional operations.”
    Full text of the letter is available here and below:
    Dear Acting Administrator Ehikian:
    We write to follow up to our March 7 letter regarding the General Services Administration’s (GSA) ongoing efforts to cancel leases and sell off federally owned facilities in concert with the U.S. Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). We remain particularly concerned with the unacceptable impacts that would result from the unilateral forced relocations of Congressional offices or other Legislative Branch agencies.
    Unfortunately, GSA has failed to respond in a timely way. This lack of responsiveness to Congress is unacceptable. GSA is funded and overseen by Congress and is accountable to the American people and their duly elected representatives in Congress. A lack of transparency, combined with uncoordinated and chaotic policy announcements and execution, is the opposite of “government efficiency.”
    Nevertheless, we are encouraged by reports and information that we have received through other channels that GSA has stopped its misguided plans to cancel leases or divest buildings that host Legislative Branch agencies and offices. We are also pleased that GSA and DOGE are no longer pursuing lease terminations or taking steps to divest buildings that host Members of Congress offices in their home states and districts. These reports were confirmed by GSA’s press release issued Friday afternoon on March 21 with a reduced list of buildings identified for divestment.
    As noted in our March 7 letter, Members of Congress utilize offices across the country to carry out their constitutional duties within their home states and districts. We reiterate that closing facilities that host Congressional offices and forcing them to relocate would directly interfere with Congress’s constitutional duties, pose significant security risks, and cause disruption to essential constituent services. We are relieved that GSA and DOGE have heeded our strong objections and reversed course.
    However, DOGE and GSA have continued their indiscriminate firing of GSA Congressional Support staff and regional building management staff, leaving dozens of federal buildings with Congressional tenants without adequate support. DOGE and GSA should similarly reverse course on these untargeted and short-sighted staff reductions that risk disrupting congressional operations.
    We all share the stated goals of ensuring efficient use of federal office space and being responsible stewards of taxpayer funds. GSA should consult with Legislative Branch tenants and reach appropriate agreements that ensure safety, security, and avoid disrupting operations. If DOGE and GSA again consider unilaterally terminating leases or divesting buildings that host Congressional or other Legislative Branch offices, you should immediately notify Congressional leadership, the Senate and House Sergeants-at-Arms, the Senate Rules Committee, and the Committee on House Administration on a bipartisan basis.
    Thank you for your continued attention to these important considerations when it comes to Legislative Branch use of GSA facilities.
    Sincerely,

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI United Nations: General Assembly Commemorates Slave Trade Remembrance, Adopts Resolutions on Conflict Diamonds, High-Level Talks on Rohingyas

    Source: United Nations 4

    Note: Full coverage of today’s meeting of the General Assembly will be available Wednesday, 26 March.

    The General Assembly today adopted resolutions on a range of topics, from the role of diamonds in fuelling conflict to a high-level conference on Rohingyas in Myanmar, while also holding a special event to pay tribute to the 15 million men, women and children from Africa who were trafficked into slavery.

    Conflict Diamonds

    The resolution on “The role of diamonds in fuelling conflict:  breaking the link between the illicit transaction of rough diamonds and armed conflict as a contribution to prevention and settlement of conflicts” (document A/79/L.63) was adopted without a vote, following the United States’ unsuccessful bid to remove four paragraphs that refer to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the Sustainable Development Goals.

    An overwhelming majority — 144 Member States — voted in favour of retaining those paragraphs, defeating two negative votes cast by the United States and Argentina.  Six delegations — Côte d’Ivoire, Haiti, Libya, Maldives, Panama and Paraguay — abstained on the vote.

    By its terms, the Assembly reaffirmed the importance of the tripartite nature of the Kimberley Process and stressed that the widest possible participation in the Kimberley Process Certification Scheme is essential.

    The Kimberley Process, an international certification scheme for rough diamonds, is open to all countries, and began when southern African diamond-producing States met in Kimberley, South Africa, in May 2000, to discuss ways to tackle the financing of violence by armed movements through the illicit diamond trade. 

    Introducing the text, the representative of the United Arab Emirates said the current resolution reflects a “shared commitment to fostering a sustainable and responsible diamond industry that benefits millions around the world”.  The representative of the European Union, speaking in its capacity as observer, voiced support for reforming the Kimberley Process.  Unfortunately, due to lack of consensus, “the definition of conflict diamonds remains very narrow”, she said, stressing the need to ensure the Process remains relevant and credible in a changing world.  The Russian Federation’s delegation, however, rejecting the pressure from Western countries to unilaterally filter the diamonds that are entering the main market, said this attempt by consumer countries to deliberately thwart tried and tested multilateral mechanisms is reckless and incompetent.

    MIL OSI United Nations News