Category: housing

  • MIL-Evening Report: Robot eyes are power hungry. What if we gave them tools inspired by the human brain?

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Adam D Hines, Research Fellow, Centre for Robotics, Queensland University of Technology

    A hexapod robot navigating outdoors. Adam Hines

    Robots are increasingly becoming a part of our lives – from warehouse automation to robotic vacuum cleaners. And just like humans, robots need to know where they are to reliably navigate from A to B.

    How far, and for how long, a robot can navigate depends on how much power it consumes over time. Robot navigation systems are especially energy hungry.

    But what if power consumption was no longer a concern?

    Our research on “brain-inspired” computing, published today in Science Robotics, could make navigational robots of the future more energy efficient than previously imagined.

    This could potentially extend and expand what’s possible for battery-powered systems working in challenging environments such as disaster zones, underwater, and even in space.

    How do robots ‘see’ the world?

    The battery going flat on your smartphone is usually just a minor inconvenience. For a robot, running out of power can mean the difference between life and death – including for the people it might be helping.

    Robots such as search and rescue drones, underwater robots monitoring the Great Barrier Reef, and space rovers all need to navigate while running on limited power supplies.

    Robots that navigate challenging environments need a lot of battery power for their cameras and other sensors.
    NASA/JPL-Caltech/MSSS

    Many of these robots can’t rely on GPS for navigation. They keep track of where they are using a process called visual place recognition. Visual place recognition lets a robot estimate where it’s located in the world using just what it “sees” through its camera.

    But this method uses a lot of energy. Robotic vision systems alone can use up to a third of the energy from a typical lithium ion battery found onboard a robot.

    This is because modern robotic vision, including visual place recognition, typically relies on power-hungry machine learning models, similar to the ones used in AI like ChatGPT.

    By comparison, our brains require just enough power to turn on a light bulb, while allowing us to see things and navigate the world with remarkable precision.

    Robotics engineers often look to biology for inspiration. In our new study, we turned to the human brain to help us create a new, energy-efficient visual place recognition system.

    Mimicking the brain

    Our system uses a brain-inspired technology called neuromorphic computing. As the name suggests, neuromorphic computers take principles from neuroscience to design computer chips and software that can learn and process information like human brains do.

    An important feature of neuromorphic computers is that they are highly energy-efficient. A regular computer can use up to 100 times more power than a neuromorphic chip.

    Neuromorphic computing is not limited to just computer chips, however. It can be paired with bio-inspired cameras that capture the world more like the human eye does. These are called dynamic vision sensors, and they work like motion detectors for each pixel. They only “wake up” and send information when something changes in the scene, rather than constantly streaming data like a regular camera.

    What a regular camera sees (left) compared to a bio-inspired camera (right).
    Adam Hines

    These bio-inspired cameras are also highly energy efficient, using less than 1% of the power of normal cameras.

    So if brain-inspired computers and bio-inspired cameras are so wonderful, why aren’t robots using them everywhere? Well, there are a range of challenges to overcome, which was the focus of our recent research.

    A new kind of LENS

    The unique properties of a dynamic vision sensor are, ironically, a limiting factor in many visual place recognition systems.

    Standard visual place recognition models are built on the foundation of static images, like the ones taken by your smartphone. Since a neuromorphic sensor doesn’t produce static images but senses the world in a constantly changing way, we need a brain-inspired computer to process what it “sees”.

    Our research overcomes this challenge by combining neuromorphic chips and sensors for robots that use visual place recognition. We call this system Locational Encoding with Neuromorphic Systems, or LENS for short.

    LENS uses the continuous information stream from a dynamic vision sensor directly on a neuromorphic chip. The system uses a machine learning method known as spiking neural networks. These process information like human brains do.

    By combining all these neuromorphic components, we reduced the power needed for visual place recognition by over 90%. Since nearly a third of the energy needed for a robot is vision related, this is a significant reduction.

    To achieve this, we used an off-the-shelf product called SynSense Speck, which combines a neuromorphic chip and a dynamic vision sensor all in one compact package.

    The entire system only required 180 kilobytes of memory to map an area of Brisbane eight kilometres in length. That’s a tiny fraction of what would be needed in a standard visual place recognition system.

    Hexapod robots have six legs and can walk on different surfaces both indoors and outdoors.

    A robot in the wild

    For testing, we placed our LENS system on a hexapod robot. Hexapods are multi-terrain robots that can navigate both indoors and outdoors.

    In our tests, the LENS performed as well as a typical visual place recognition system, but used much less energy.

    Our work comes at a time when AI development is trending towards creating bigger, more power-hungry solutions for improved performance. The energy needed to train and use systems like OpenAI’s ChatGPT is notoriously demanding, with concerns that modern AI represents unsustainable growth in energy demands.

    For robots that need to navigate, developing more compact, energy-efficient AI using neuromorphic computing could be key for being able to go farther and for longer periods of time. There are still challenges to solve, but we are closer to making it a reality.

    Michael Milford receives funding from the Australian Research Council, the Australian Economic Accelerator, the Queensland Government, Amazon, Ford Motor Company, iMOVE CRC, the DAAD Australia-Germany Co-operation Scheme and DSTG. He is affiliated with the Motor Trades Association of Queensland as a non-executive board member.

    Tobias Fischer receives funding from the Australian Research Council, the DAAD Australia-Germany Co-operation Scheme, the Great Barrier Reef Foundation via the Reef Restoration and Adaptation Program, and the Queensland Department of Environment, Science and Innovation.

    Adam D Hines does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. Robot eyes are power hungry. What if we gave them tools inspired by the human brain? – https://theconversation.com/robot-eyes-are-power-hungry-what-if-we-gave-them-tools-inspired-by-the-human-brain-257978

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Stargazing flight: how Bogong moths use the night sky to navigate hundreds of kilometres

    Source:

    19 June 2025

    Bogong moth. Photo credit: Ajay Narendra, Macquarie University.

    In a world-first discovery, researchers have shown that Australia’s iconic Bogong moth uses constellations of stars and the Milky Way to navigate hundreds of kilometres across the country during its annual migration – making it the first known invertebrate to rely on a stellar compass for long-distance travel.

    The landmark study, published today in Nature, reveals how this unassuming nocturnal moth combines celestial navigation with Earth’s magnetic field to pinpoint a specific destination it has never visited before: the cool alpine caves of the Snowy Mountains, where it hibernates for the summer.

    Led by an international team of scientists from Lund University, the Australian National University (ANU), the University of South Australia (UniSA) and other global institutions, the research sheds new light on one of nature’s great migration mysteries, involving approximately four million moths each year.

    “Until now, we knew that some birds and even humans could use the stars to navigate long distances, but this is the first time that it’s been proven in an insect,” says Lund University Professor of Zoology, Eric Warrant, who is also a Visiting Fellow at the ANU and an Adjunct Professor at UniSA.

    “Bogong moths are incredibly precise. They use the stars as a compass to guide them over vast distances, adjusting their bearing based on the season and time of night.”

    Each spring, billions of Bogong moths (Agrotis infusa) emerge from breeding grounds across southeast Australia and fly up to 1000 kilometres to a small number of caves and rocky outcrops in the Australian Alps.

    A wall of Bogong moths, aestivating in a cave in the Australian Alps.

    The moths lie dormant in the cool, dark shelters throughout summer, and in autumn make the return journey to breed and die.

    Using sophisticated flight simulators and brain recordings in controlled, magnetically neutral environments, the researchers tested how moths orient themselves under different sky conditions.

    When presented with natural starry skies and no magnetic field, they consistently flew in the correct migratory direction for the season – southward in spring, northward in autumn.

    When the starry skies were rotated 180 degrees, the moths reversed direction accordingly, but when the stars were scrambled, their orientation vanished.

    “This proves they are not just flying towards the brightest light or following a simple visual cue,” says Prof Warrant. “They’re reading specific patterns in the night sky to determine a geographic direction, just like migratory birds do.”

    Interestingly, when stars were obscured by clouds, the moths maintained their direction using only the Earth’s magnetic field. This dual compass system ensures reliable navigation even in variable conditions.

    The team also delved into the neurological basis of this behaviour, identifying specialised neurons in the moth’s brain that respond to the orientation of the starry sky. These cells, found in brain regions responsible for navigation and steering, fire most strongly when the moth is facing southwards.

    “This kind of directional tuning shows that the Bogong moth brain encodes celestial information in a surprisingly sophisticated way. It’s a remarkable example of complex navigational ability packed into a tiny insect brain.”

    Researchers say the discovery could inform technologies in robotics, drone navigation, and even conservation strategies for species threatened by habitat loss or climate change.

    Bogong moth populations have declined sharply in recent years, promoting their listing as vulnerable.

    The study underscores the importance of protecting migratory pathways and the dark skies these moths rely on.

    “This is not just about a moth  ̶  it’s about how animals read the world around them,” says Prof Warrant. “The night sky has guided human explorers for millennia. Now we know that it guides moths, too.”

    Co-author Professor Javaan Chahl, a remote sensing engineer from the University of South Australia, made headlines in August 2024 using the discoveries from a previous study led by Lund University involving dung beetles, who use the Milky Way as a reference point to roll balls of dung in straight lines.

    Prof Chahl’s team modelled the same technique used by dung beetles to develop an AI sensor for robot navigation in low light.

    The Nature paper “Bogong moths use a stellar compass for long-distance navigation at night” is authored by researchers from Europe, the UK, China, Australia, Canada and Australia. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-025-09135-3

    A video produced by the Australian Academy of Science, explaining Prof Warrant’s research, is available at: www.youtube.com/watch?v=AqiG_xBUFE0.  Prof Warrant was elected a Corresponding Member of the Academy in 2024.

    …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

    Media contact: Candy Gibson M: +61 434 605 142 E: candy.gibson@unisa.edu.au

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI: Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP Extends General Line of Credit Facility

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    OMAHA, Neb., June 18, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP (NYSE: GHI) (the “Partnership”) announced today that on June 12, 2025, it amended its existing $50 million secured revolving Line of Credit facility (“LOC”). The LOC is secured by the Partnership’s joint venture equity investments. BankUnited, N.A. serves as sole arranger and administrative agent.

    The amendment extended the maturity date to June 2027, with two additional one-year extension options, increased the maximum allowable seniors housing joint venture equity investments the Partnership can make to 30% of eligible encumbered assets, and increased the Partnership’s maximum allowable limited guaranties of debt associated with its joint venture equity investments.

    An affiliate of the Partnership’s general partner provides a deficiency guaranty for the facility. The affiliate does not charge the Partnership a fee for the deficiency guaranty.

    “The amendment to our general LOC provides valuable liquidity and enhances our operational flexibility to make additional joint venture equity investments in the seniors housing segment,” said Kenneth C. Rogozinski, Chief Executive Officer of the Partnership.

    About Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP

    Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP was formed in 1998 under the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act for the primary purpose of acquiring, holding, selling and otherwise dealing with a portfolio of mortgage revenue bonds which have been issued to provide construction and/or permanent financing for affordable multifamily, seniors and student housing properties. The Partnership is pursuing a business strategy of acquiring additional mortgage revenue bonds and other investments on a leveraged basis. The Partnership expects and believes the interest earned on these mortgage revenue bonds is excludable from gross income for federal income tax purposes. The Partnership seeks to achieve its investment growth strategy by investing in additional mortgage revenue bonds and other investments as permitted by its Second Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement, dated December 5, 2022, taking advantage of attractive financing structures available in the securities market, and entering into interest rate risk management instruments. Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP press releases are available at www.ghiinvestors.com.

    Safe Harbor Statement

    Information contained in this press release contains “forward-looking statements,” which are based on current expectations, forecasts and assumptions that involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual outcomes and results to differ materially. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, risks involving current maturities of our financing arrangements and our ability to renew or refinance such maturities, fluctuations in short-term interest rates, collateral valuations, mortgage revenue bond investment valuations and overall economic and credit market conditions. For a further list and description of such risks, see the reports and other filings made by the Partnership with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including but not limited to, its Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, and Current Reports on Form 8-K. Readers are urged to consider these factors carefully in evaluating the forward-looking statements. The Partnership disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

    MEDIA CONTACT:
    Karen Marotta
    Greystone
    212-896-9149
    Karen.Marotta@greyco.com

    INVESTOR CONTACT:
    Andy Grier
    Senior Vice President
    402-952-1235

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI USA: Senator Markey Demands Answers from Verizon on Worker Exposure to Toxic Lead

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Massachusetts Ed Markey
    Letter Text (PDF)
    Washington (June 18, 2025) – Senator Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.), a member of the Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee and the Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee, today wrote to Hans Vestberg, Chairman and CEO of Verizon, following the publication of a health evaluation from the National Institutes of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) showing extremely high concentrations of toxic lead at Verizon worksites and elevated levels of lead in workers’ blood. In 2023, an extensive Wall Street Journal investigation documented a sprawling nationwide network of legacy lead-sheathed cables that telecommunications companies—including Verizon—installed in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries and left underground, underwater, and overhead.
    In the letter the Senator writes, “It is Verizon’s responsibility—both moral and legal—to safeguard the well-being of its workers and the communities in which it operates. The exposure of telecom workers in Massachusetts to lead-laced environments, including manholes where sediment contained lead concentrations as high as 30,000 parts per million—150 times the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) current safety limit—demands the highest level of attention from Verizon. Verizon must act swiftly to eliminate lead exposure from its operations, remediate affected environments, and commit to full transparency and accountability moving forward.”
    Senator Markey continues, “Most recently, NIOSH completed a Health Hazard Evaluation confirming serious occupational exposures among Verizon workers in Massachusetts; we understand a copy of the final report has been provided to Verizon. NIOSH found that these workers were repeatedly exposed to lead because inadequate safety procedures in place failed to protect them. NIOSH also reviewed past blood-level testing by workers, which found examples of workers with elevated blood lead levels according to federal safety guidelines; this suggests recent worker exposure at unsafe levels of lead. Additionally, NIOSH hygienists found lead on workers hands, boots, and in their trucks, suggesting many may be unknowingly carrying home a substance that could endanger their families. Children are particularly sensitive to lead, with even low levels of exposure resulting in developmental delays, difficulty learning, and behavioral issues.”
    Senator Markey requests responses by July 9, 2025, to questions including:
    What is the status of Verizon’s efforts to compile a comprehensive inventory, including geographic mapping, of all known and suspected lead-sheathed cables it owns or for which it is responsible?
    What steps has Verizon taken since the publication of the Wall Street Journal investigation to:
    (a) Identify and monitor worker exposure to lead from lead-sheathed telecommunications cables?
    (b) Notify and protect workers performing duties in or near areas with lead-sheathed cables?
    (c) Inform the public, especially in environmental justice communities, about risks posed by lead-sheathed cables, and field and respond to concerns?
    (d) Test for and remediate environmental contamination around legacy infrastructure?
    (e) Provide medical monitoring, treatment, or compensation for lead-exposed workers?
    What is the status of any investigations by the U.S. Department of Justice, the EPA, or OSHA into Verizon’s handling of its lead-sheathed cables?
    Will Verizon commit to fully implementing all the NIOSH recommendations, including conducting routine BLL testing and retrofitting hygiene and PPE protocols across all affected facilities? Which recommendations, if any, has Verizon already implemented? What is the status of recommendations not yet implemented?
    Has Verizon conducted its own personal air sampling at work sites containing lead-sheathed cables? If so, please provide the results by year and location of the tests.
    (a) Does Verizon have an explanation for the personal air sample tested by NIOSH that exceeded OSHA limits?
    (b) How did Verizon previously determine whether to conduct a personal air sampling test?
    Has Verizon conducted its own manhole-soil-sediment testing at worksites containing lead-sheathed cables? Does Verizon have an explanation for the bulk sediment sampled that exceeded 30,000 ppm for lead?
    Why was Verizon not providing its workers in Massachusetts with lead removal wipes prior to the NIOSH Health Hazard Evaluation? Why did Verizon start to provide them—in place of wet wipes—between the first and second NIOSH site visits?
    What internal accountability measures is Verizon adopting to ensure executive leadership is fully informed and responsive to worker safety concerns related to lead exposure from legacy telecommunications cables?
    In February 2024, Senator Markey hosted a roundtable event in Chicopee, Massachusetts, along with state and local elected officials, public health leaders, and occupational safety and environmental experts, to discuss the environmental, public health, and occupational safety concerns posed by lead-sheathed telecommunications cables.
    In July 2023, Senator Markey, author of the 1996 Telecommunications Act, wrote to the United States Telecom Association (USTelecom) demanding answers to questions raised by the Wall Street Journal investigation, which found detectable levels of lead contamination in water and soil samples collected near lead-sheathed cables across the country.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Following Trump Attacks on TPS, Markey, Van Hollen, Senate Democrats Put Forward Bill to Protect TPS and DED Recipients

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Massachusetts Ed Markey

    Washington (June 18, 2025) – Today, U.S. Senator Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) was joined by 30 Senate colleagues in putting forward legislation to provide qualified Temporary Protected Status (TPS) and Deferred Enforced Departure (DED) recipients a path to legal permanent residency. The Senators’ reintroduction of this legislation – the Safe Environment from Countries Under Repression and Emergency (SECURE) Act – comes as the Trump Administration and the right-wing Supreme Court undermine TPS, a program that has for years provided refuge to those living in America who have fled natural disasters, violence, and political insecurity. The Trump Administration has revoked TPS for an estimated 563,000 recipients from five countries – Venezuela, Haiti, Afghanistan, Cameroon, and Nepal – and while there have been legal challenges filed against this action, the Supreme Court has temporarily allowed the revocation to stand – putting hundreds of thousands at risk of deportation to their home countries where they would face serious danger.

    This legislation is endorsed by AFL-CIO, Laborers’ International Union of North America (LIUNA), International Union of Painters and Allied Trades (IUPAT), CASA, National TPS Alliance, Working Families United, the National Network for Arab American Communities, International Longshore and Warehouse Union (ILWU), Service Employees International Union (SEIU), and Communities United for Status and Protection (CUSP).

    “As Donald Trump continues to strip immigrant communities of critical legal protections, we must protect the individuals who came to our country seeking safe harbor and who cannot return home safely. I am proud to join my colleagues in introducing the SECURE Act, to ensure that individuals fleeing armed conflicts, political unrest, or environmental disasters have a guaranteed pathway to safety in the United States. Recipients of Temporary Protected Status and Deferred Enforced Departure are our friends, our neighbors, our colleagues, and we cannot turn our backs on them. We must be loud and clear – immigrants are welcome here,” said Senator Markey.

    “America has long used the TPS and DED programs to offer special legal protections to individuals in the United States whose lives would be put at extreme risk if forced to return to their countries of origin. As they’ve sought safety and stability here, TPS and DED recipients have built new lives in America, living here legally for years – sometimes decades – and making important contributions to our communities. But the Trump Administration is threatening both the lives they have built and the safety of these individuals – forcing TPS recipients to return to dangerous places like Haiti, Venezuela, Afghanistan, and more. This bill offers much-needed certainty to TPS and DED recipients – providing a path to stay safely in the U.S. and continue to call America their home,” said Senator Van Hollen.

    “TPS and DED recipients are valuable members of our communities. Many have lived here for years with U.S. children, spouses, and even businesses they’ve built — yet they are forced to live in uncertainty and fear that they may lose everything if they lose TPS or DED. I’m proud to introduce this legislation to give TPS and DED recipients a path to permanent residence so they can continue to contribute to America,” said Senator Kaine.

    “America is strengthened by the contributions and hard work of immigrants. But this Administration’s cruelty has left thousands of workers in limbo — without legal status and without work authorization,” said Senator Padilla. “The SECURE Act provides TPS holders who live and work in the United States legally, seeking safety after fleeing dangerous conditions in their home countries, the security of a pathway to permanent residency protections while continuing to contribute to our communities and economy.”

    “TPS recipients have come to the U.S. to escape widespread violence and environmental disasters in their countries that make returning home unsafe.  As they rebuild their lives here, TPS recipients, as longtime residents of the United States, deserve security and certainty about their immigration status,” said Senator Durbin. “I’m joining Senator Van Hollen to introduce the SECURE Act to provide TPS recipients a pathway to legal permanent residency.”

    “As the Trump administration terrorizes immigrant communities and arbitrarily revokes TPS and DED for law-abiding immigrants, it’s important that we speak up and push back every way we can, and support individuals who are contributing to our communities and would be at severe risk if they were to be forced to return to their countries of origin,” said Senator Murray. “I’m proud to join my colleagues in introducing the SECURE Act to provide immigrants with Temporary Protected Status and Deferred Enforced Departure a path to legal permanent residency.”

    “After escaping horrific violence and persecution in their home countries, TPS and DED recipients come to this country in search of a better life,” said Senator Cortez Masto. “These hardworking men and women have been living in and contributing to our communities for years, and it’s common sense to give them the certainty they need to fulfill the American Dream.”

    “Virginia is home to tens of thousands of law-abiding immigrants who are unable to return to their countries of origin due to painful extraordinary circumstances. Though these individuals benefit from certain protections from deportation, they remain in limbo despite having lived and worked in the U.S. for years,” said Senator Warner. “I’m proud to introduce this legislation to create a real pathway to permanent residency for TPS and DED recipients who drive our economy and make valuable contributions to their communities.”

    “The Temporary Protected Status program has been a lifeline that has allowed people and families facing unimaginable circumstances to find a safe refuge here in the United States,” said Senator Rosen. “TPS recipients contribute to our communities and our economy, and they deserve a pathway to permanent residency, which is why I’m proud to help introduce this bill. I’ll keep standing up to protect Nevada’s immigrant families.”

    “TPS holders deserve certainty, especially when the Trump administration is suddenly ending people’s status with no justification and forcing them to return to unsafe conditions,” said Senator Schatz. “Our bill would enable TPS holders to apply for permanent status so they can continue to live, work, and contribute in the United States without constantly being stuck in limbo.”

    “Families should have protection from ongoing wars, environmental disasters, widespread illness, and other dangers that make it difficult to return home,” said Senator Warren. “While Donald Trump makes it harder for immigrants to navigate our complex immigration system, Senate Democrats are fighting back to protect these vulnerable families.”

    “Scripture tells us: welcome the stranger in your midst,” said Senator Coons. “When we welcome those fleeing persecution and violence, hunger and poverty around the world, we show the world our values. That makes America safer, and it grows the economy in states like Delaware. The SECURE Act gives people searching for freedom and safety, who love this country, and who are already adding their valuable skills and gifts to our nation, a path to continue to do so.”

    “Our country has long supported families fleeing violence and seeking refuge,” said Senator Luján. “As this administration continues its attacks on TPS recipients, Congress must ensure a legal pathway to permanent residency for those who contribute to our communities every day. That’s why I’m partnering with my colleagues to reintroduce the SECURE Act to provide permanent protections for thousands of TPS recipients who live and work lawfully in the U.S.”

    “As immigrant communities continue to come under attack, the SECURE Act provides a clear pathway to permanent residency—offering overdue, necessary protections for immigrants and the lives they’ve built in our nation. America is a nation of immigrants and has a storied history of providing opportunity and refuge for those fleeing hardship or crisis. Individuals with TPS and DED have made America their home—using their talents and skills to strengthen our economies and enrich our communities—often while the countries from which they fled remain in turmoil,” said Senator Blumenthal.

    “Trump’s heartless immigration policies do nothing to make us safer and betray our core values—our nation always has been and always will be stronger because of our immigrant communities,” said Senator Duckworth. “While no one is arguing that we shouldn’t be deporting violent criminals who pose a danger to our country, it’s cruel to target people who fled from life-threatening situations and have been productive members of our communities for years. I’m proud to help Senator Van Hollen reintroduce this legislation to help give TPS and DED recipients a path to remain here as legal permanent residents.”

    “Our country should serve as a refuge for individuals who cannot return to their home country due to dangerous circumstances,” said Senator Hirono. “TPS holders and DED recipients living in our country are essential members of our communities, making up a significant amount of our workforce and contributing to our economy. As this administration continues its all-out attack on immigrants and their loved ones, I am proud to reintroduce this legislation to provide TPS and DED recipients peace of mind that they can remain in the country safely and with a path to lawful permanent residence.”

    “This bill is a necessary step in creating a pathway to legal permanent residency for TPS recipients,” said Senator Bennet. “They are already facing extraordinary and unstable conditions in their home countries; they shouldn’t have to face those same conditions here in the U.S.”

    “I’m joining the effort to pass the SECURE Act to stand by thousands in New Jersey who do not deserve to live in uncertainty and fear as the Trump administration arbitrarily revokes Temporary Protected Status,” said Senator Kim. “TPS recipients are friends and neighbors who are part of our communities and are essential to the economic growth of our state. We should use this moment to address disorder in our TPS program and immigration system – and deliver eligible families a pathway toward permanent stability and security.”

    “TPS provides protection for individuals and families who are unable to return to their countries due to dangerous conditions, including natural disasters, armed conflicts, and other disasters. Many find refuge in California where they can live and work lawfully under its protections. This legislation would provide a much-needed sense of security and stability to those who are living in the legal limbo caused by President Trump’s targeting of this program and his continued erosion of our nation’s commitment to helping those fleeing violence, famine, disease, and disaster,” said Senator Schiff.

    The legislation is cosponsored by Senators Angela Alsobrooks (D-Md.), Tammy Baldwin (D-Wis.), Michael Bennet (D-Colo.), Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), Cory Booker (D-N.J.), Chris Coons (D-Del.), Catherine Cortez-Masto (D-Nev.), Tammy Duckworth (D-Ill.), Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), John Hickenlooper (D-Colo.), Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii), Tim Kaine (D-Va.), Andy Kim (D-N.J.) Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.), Patty Murray (D-Wash.), Alex Padilla (D-Calif.), Jack Reed (D-R.I.), Jacky Rosen (D-Nev.), Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii), Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), Tina Smith (D-Minn.), Mark Warner (D-Va.), Raphael Warnock (D-Ga.), Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), and Ron Wyden (D-Ore.).

    “Immigrant workers are under unprecedented attack: hundreds of thousands of people have been stripped of their legal status and work authorization, throwing families and industries into chaos and uncertainty. Workers with Temporary Protected Status, many of whom have lived and worked in our country for decades, are vital members of our communities and our unions. The SECURE Act is common-sense legislation that would provide TPS holders with stable, permanent lawful status so they can continue to raise their families, work, and contribute to our economy,” said Liz Shuler, AFL-CIO President.

    “LIUNA commends Senator Van Hollen for his tireless efforts to protect workers and their family members who have Temporary Protected Status (TPS), many of whom are members of our union and who have lived and worked in the U.S. for decades. About 1/3 of TPS holders work in construction. The SECURE Act will not only provide permanence to these hard-working immigrants, but will also help the U.S. economy by retaining these valued immigrants in our workforce,” said Brent Booker, General President, LIUNA.

    “Every day, thousands of people with TPS and DED who have built their lives, families, and futures here are forced to live with fear and uncertainty. They deserve more than endless waiting; they deserve real, permanent protection. As attacks on immigrant communities grow across the country, we must act without hesitation. We are grateful to Senator Van Hollen’s leadership – in this time of growing instability, the SECURE Act will offer dignity, safety, and security for our community,” said Cathryn Jackson, Public Policy Director of CASA.

    “Immigrant families and allies continue to advocate for permanent protections. The National TPS Alliance calls for long-overdue justice to our immigrant communities. The reintroduction of the SECURE Act in the Senate addresses the uncertainty that our families have been living for years. This bill is timely, ensuring that TPS holders don’t fall out of status and in turn preventing irreparable harm to whole communities, continuing critical contributions to the nation’s economy. We urge congressional leaders to support this critical effort,” said Mardoel Hernandez, TPS recipient from Honduras and National TPS Alliance Executive Committee Member.

    “TPS holders, including members of my own union, contribute to our economy every single day. Some may not know it, but our society is dependent on TPS holders in different industries, including in the building and construction trades. We need the SECURE Act so these workers can continue living, working, and raising their families without fear,” said IUPAT General President Jimmy Williams, Jr.; IUPAT is a member of the Working Families United Coalition.

    “The SECURE Act offers overdue protection for hundreds of thousands living in fear of being uprooted from the families, homes, and careers they built. The National Network for Arab American Communities believes this bill reflects a critical truth: our democracy and safety are strongest when everyone has the opportunity to live and contribute freely and lawfully,” said Rima Meroueh, Director, National Network for Arab American Communities.

    “Now more than ever, we need a solution for immigrants with Temporary Protected Status from countries like El Salvador, Honduras, Venezuela and Haiti, whose lives have been in limbo under the chaos of this administration. We applaud the reintroduction of the SECURE Act by Senator Chris Van Hollen, which would create a path to citizenship for these individuals who contribute billions to our economy and whose lives would be in danger if they were sent back immediately to their home countries,” said Rocio Saenz, Secretary-Treasurer, SEIU.

    “The ILWU stands in strong support of the SECURE Act, a commonsense measure that serves our country’s interests and recognizes the dignity and contributions of TPS and DED holders — hardworking individuals who have paid their taxes, contributed to our economy, and been model members of our communities. These men and women have earned a chance to live without fear, continue to contribute to their communities and build their lives in the country they’ve long called home. We urge Congress to pass this vital legislation without delay,” said International Longshore and Warehouse Union President Robert Olvera.

    “Communities United for Status & Protection (CUSP) endorses the SECURE Act as a critical step toward justice and stability for immigrants with Temporary Protected Status (TPS) and Deferred Enforced Departure (DED). For decades, these communities—Black, Asian, brown, working-class immigrants from countries facing war, repression, and climate disaster—have lived, worked, and raised families in the U.S. They are essential to our economy, our neighborhoods, and our collective future. Yet they continue to live in uncertainty, without a pathway to permanent protection. The SECURE Act honors their dignity, recognizes their profound contributions, and upholds our nation’s values of fairness and humanitarian responsibility. We urge Congress to act with courage and conscience and pass this bill without delay,” said Carolyn Tran, Executive Director, Communities United for Status & Protection (CUSP).

    Additional Background

    TPS is a temporary, legal immigration status granted to foreign citizens who are endangered by conditions in their home country resulting from extraordinary events such as ongoing armed conflict, environmental disaster, or epidemic. TPS status is granted for set periods ranging from six to 18 months, requiring the Department of Homeland Security to extend a country’s status on a recurring basis. Each time a country is recertified, recipients must reapply and pass a thorough background check. Recent estimates found there are approximately 860,000 people with TPS in the United States.

    Deferred enforced departure (DED) is a temporary and discretionary administrative stay of removal granted to foreign citizens from designated countries. Unlike TPS, a DED designation emanates from the President’s constitutional powers to conduct foreign relations and has no statutory basis. Grants are usually in response to war, civil unrest, or natural disasters, through an executive order or presidential memorandum that provides eligibility guidelines.

    The SECURE Act will provide long-term stability for these individuals and their communities by giving them the ability to apply for legal permanent residency. Under the bill, all TPS recipients – current and past – and TPS and DED eligible individuals who have been continuously present in the United States for at least three years would be eligible to apply for legal permanent residency.

    Additionally, under the SECURE Act:

    • A spouse, domestic partner, child, or unmarried child of a qualifying non-citizen would be eligible to obtain permanent resident status (upon meeting certain requirements).
    • Individuals with a pending TPS application will receive work authorization and be eligible for travel authorization.
    • Non-citizens who have a pending application or is prima facie eligible for permanent status under the bill and intends to apply are shielded from deportation.
    • Information from an applicant’s application may not be shared or used for immigration enforcement purposes, with limited exceptions, such as for the identification of fraudulent claims.
    • DHS must report to Congress when terminating a country’s TPS designation with an explanation to justify the termination.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Warner, Kaine, Scott Urge EPA to Reinstate Funding for Cancelled Community Resilience Grants

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Virginia Tim Kaine

    WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, U.S. Senators Mark R. Warner, Tim Kaine (both D-VA), and Rep. Bobby Scott (D-VA-03) sent a letter to Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Lee Zeldin urging the agency to reverse its decision to terminate two major Community Change Grants in Virginia. The cancelled grants – approximately $40 million – would have supported dozens of community projects aimed at strengthening flood resilience, reducing pollution, and improving energy efficiency in Hampton and across Southwest Virginia.

    The grants, funded by the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), were intended to support projects that increase resilience to major weather events, reduce pollution, and build community capacity.

    The City of Hampton received $20 million in federal funding to address severe flood risk in the Aberdeen Gardens neighborhood. That funding would have advanced 51 projects ranging from stormwater infrastructure upgrades and rain garden construction to stream restoration efforts and improved public health protections for an area where over 22 percent of properties fall within FEMA-designated flood zones.

    United Way of Southwest Virginia and the University of Virginia’s College at Wise also received nearly $20 million in federal funding to support flood resilient housing, the construction of a community center and flood shelter in Dickenson County, and energy efficiency upgrades at childcare centers in eight counties in Southwest Virginia. These investments would have delivered long-term savings, improved disaster readiness, and supported vulnerable Appalachian communities hit hard by extreme weather in recent years.

    In the letter, the lawmakers wrote, “We are deeply concerned that the EPA no longer considers community resiliency, environmental conservation, and economic development to be administration funding priorities.”

    They continued, “EPA’s decision to terminate these grants will leave communities in Virginia less resilient, less prosperous, and more vulnerable to extreme weather-related disasters. We urge you to reinstate this critical funding for communities throughout Virginia.”

    Warner, Kaine, and Scott have long advocated for resiliency efforts in Virginia, championing legislation and funding to help communities strengthen infrastructure against extreme weather. The senators were strong supporters of the Inflation Reduction Act, which authorized the Community Change Grants program to help historically neglected and underserved communities address flooding, pollution, and climate vulnerabilities.

    The lawmakers have also continuously stood up against the Trump administration’s efforts to cancel necessary federal funding for Virginia’s communities. Most recently, Warner, Kaine, and Scott wrote to Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem to reversethe cancellation of critical infrastructure funding for the Commonwealth. 

    Text of the letter is available here and below.

    Dear Administrator Zeldin:

    We write regarding the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) decision to terminate approximately $40 million in funding intended to prevent localized pollution and mitigate the effects of flooding in Hampton, Virginia, and to support economic development, enhance resilient infrastructure, and lower energy costs across seven counties in Southwest Virginia. We strongly urge you to reverse this decision that will impact efforts to improve resiliency, environmental conservation, energy efficiency, and economic outcomes in communities across the Commonwealth.

    The Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) provided approximately $2 billion to EPA to establish the Community Change Grants Program. Congress intended this funding to be used to support projects that increase community resilience, reduce pollution, and build community capacity. In 2024, EPA selected 105 projects, including two projects in Virginia.

    The City of Hampton, Virginia, was awarded just over $20 million to address significant flood risk in the historic Aberdeen Gardens neighborhood. In a locality where 22 percent of properties are in Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)-designated Special Flood Hazard Areas, the city and their nonprofit partner, Wetlands Watch, planned to leverage federal funding to advance 51 projects to update stormwater infrastructure, initiate stream-restoration projects, and construct community rain gardens. These projects were intended to mitigate flood risk, lessen the financial burden of flooding on the neighborhood’s residents, and improve environmental and public health outcomes.

    The United Way of Southwest Virginia and the University of Virginia were awarded nearly $20 million to fund eight projects across the Virginia coalfields. Funding would have supported the construction of flood-resilient housing infrastructure in Buchanan County and a new community center and flood shelter in Dickenson County, two communities that have been devastated by flooding and extreme weather in recent years. Additionally, the grant would support energy efficiency upgrades at childcare facilities in eight counties, enabling thousands of dollars of energy cost savings to go towards childcare worker salaries.

    In terminating these grants, EPA wrote to awardees that, “the objectives of the award are no longer consistent with EPA funding priorities.” We are deeply concerned that the EPA no longer considers community resiliency, environmental conservation, and economic development to be administration funding priorities. EPA’s decision to terminate these grants will leave communities in Virginia less resilient, less prosperous, and more vulnerable to extreme weather-related disasters. We urge you to reinstate this critical funding for communities throughout Virginia. 

    Thank you for your attention to this letter. We look forward to your response.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Padilla, Schiff, Blumenthal Introduce Legislation to Limit Unchecked Presidential Authority Under the Insurrection Act

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Alex Padilla (D-Calif.)

    Padilla, Schiff, Blumenthal Introduce Legislation to Limit Unchecked Presidential Authority Under the Insurrection Act

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — U.S. Senators Alex Padilla (D-Calif.), Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), and Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) led a group of 22 Senators in introducing legislation to restrict the President’s authority under the 217-year-old Insurrection Act.

    The new Insurrection Act of 2025 would reform centuries-old legislation that gives the President broad and vague authority to deploy troops — either with or without the request of a state — to suppress “any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy.” The current law has been used sparingly by other presidents given the potential for the military to escalate tensions, rather than restore order, during a domestic crisis.

    “Our military should be focused on defending our national security — not silencing speech a president disagrees with or policing our own citizens,” said Senator Padilla. “President Trump’s unprecedented deployment of the National Guard and Marines to Los Angeles to manufacture a crisis and distract from his failing political agenda is a clear warning sign: we must strengthen legal protections around the executive authority to use the military for standard domestic law enforcement. The archaic Insurrection Act is far too broad and grants nearly unchecked powers to a president to abuse the military for their own political purposes — and we must make sure it continues to only be invoked in the most extreme of circumstances.”

    “The president’s dangerous decision to deploy the National Guard and the U.S. Marine Corps in Los Angeles over the objection of our governor brings us closer to the very real possibility that the president could invoke the Insurrection Act to turn our military into a political tool. That must never be allowed to happen,” said Senator Schiff. “This bill would prevent any president from deploying military forces domestically when civilian state and local authorities are engaged. This abuse of military resources that we are seeing in Los Angeles risks being replicated around the country if Congress doesn’t stand up to President Trump’s creeping authoritarianism.”

    “Americans believe deeply that our military should be used to defend our national security, not to silence peaceful protest at home. I support – and the Constitution protects – free expression and protest when peaceful and nonviolent,” said Senator Blumenthal. “President Trump may not have invoked the Insurrection Act yet, but he has threated to use our military as an instrument to crush dissent and Congress must act quickly. These urgent reforms would impose oversight and accountability to the President’s broad, virtually unrestricted power to use military force against Americans at home.”

    The legislation is cosponsored by U.S. Senator Jack Reed (D-R.I.), Ranking Member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, and Senators Tammy Baldwin (D-Wis.), Cory Booker (D-N.J.), Chris Coons (D-Del.), Tammy Duckworth (D-Ill.), Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.), John Hickenlooper (D-Colo.), Mazie K. Hirono (D-Hawaii), Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.), Andy Kim (D-N.J.), Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.), Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Elissa Slotkin (D-Mich.), Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), Mark Warner (D-Va.), Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Peter Welch (D-Vt.), and Ron Wyden (D-Ore.).

    Specifically, the new Insurrection Act of 2025 would:

    • Narrow and clarify the criteria for the domestic deployment of military troops for law enforcement purposes.
    • Specify that the use of the military is a last resort and is authorized only if civilian law enforcement authorities are overwhelmed.
    • Clarify that the law cannot be used to suspend habeas corpus, impose martial law, or deputize private militias to act as soldiers.
    • Require the President to consult with Congress prior to invoking the Insurrection Act and receive Congressional approval if the President seeks to exercise authority under the Act for longer than seven days.
    • Require a report to Congress providing an explicit justification for the use of the Insurrection Act’s authority, as enumerated in this legislation, and a full description of the scope and duration of its use.
    • Provide for judicial review to ensure that individuals, or a state or local government, may bring a civil action if the President’s authority under the Insurrection Act is misused or abused.

    Full text of the bill is available here.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Durbin: Instead Of Conducting Critical Oversight, Judiciary Committee Republicans Are Holding Partisan Hearing Armchair Diagnosing Former President Biden

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Illinois Dick Durbin

    June 18, 2025

    WASHINGTON – U.S. Senate Democratic Whip Dick Durbin (D-IL), Ranking Member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, slammed Senate Judiciary Committee Republicans for holding a partisan hearing today where they plan to armchair diagnose former President Biden. In his opening remarks, Durbin called out the lack of oversight the Committee has conducted so far under the Trump Administration, despite the numerous, critical challenges facing the nation that are under the Committee’s jurisdiction.

    By this date in Durbin’s first year as Chair, the Committee had already held two major oversight hearings with Biden Administration agency heads, including one with FBI Director Wray on domestic terrorism threats. So far, the Republican majority on this Committee has not held a single oversight hearing.

    “This Committee has oversight responsibility over the Department of Justice, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the Department of Homeland Security. We have a constitutional duty to hold these agencies accountable with public hearings,” Durbin said. “In the last week alone, several events have demanded this Committee’s immediate attention: the horrific assassination in Minnesota, the treatment of our colleague Senator Padilla by federal agents in Los Angeles, and President Trump’s unprecedented deployment of the U.S. military in Los Angeles.”

    Durbin continued, “We should hear without delay from Attorney General Bondi and FBI Director Patel about what they are doing to address the unacceptable political violence in our country, including threats to Article III judges and justices, as well as members of Congress. And we need to hear from Homeland Security Secretary Noem about the treatment of our colleagues, Senator Padilla, and this Administration’s mass deportation campaign against immigrants. But instead of exercising this constitutional oversight duty, my Republican colleagues are holding this hearing. Apparently, armchair diagnosing former President Biden is more important than the current issues of grave concern that I have mentioned.”

    Durbin went on to note just a few examples of issues that the Senate Judiciary Committee should be addressing.

    “The Trump Administration has removed dozens of senior career prosecutors and FBI officials with decades of national security expertise, leaving our nation more vulnerable to terrorism and other national security threats. This should be explained to this Committee,” Durbin said. “The Justice Department has diverted hundreds of law enforcement agents away from combatting cartels, drug trafficking, and gun violence to participate in President Trump’s mass deportation campaign. This should be addressed in an open hearing of this Committee.”

    Durbin continued, “The Justice Department is also turning a blind eye to corruption. The Administration has gutted the Department of Justice’s Public Integrity Section, which oversees political corruption cases, just as the President’s shameful crypto scheme unfolds. And the Administration has removed the Department of Justice’s career ethics officials and shut down the office charged with investigating misconduct by DOJ attorneys.”

    Durbin then called out how his Republican colleagues are eager to discuss President Biden’s pardons, but are ignoring the actual pardon crisis of President Trump’s “pay-to-play” scheme. Durbin highlighted the story of Paul Walczak, whom President Trump pardoned after Walczak pleaded guilty in 2024 to withholding more than $7 million of taxes from his employees’ paychecks and failing to pay the IRS.

    “What warranted Mr. Walczak’s swift pardon by President Trump? His pardon application explicitly cited millions of dollars his mother raised for President Trump’s campaigns and other efforts to support the President. But that was not enough,” Durbin said. “It was three weeks after Mr. Walczak’s mother attended a $1 million a person Trump fundraiser in April of this year that Mr. Walczak was miraculously receiving his pardon—and now he no longer must pay $4.4 million to the taxpayers of this country. That’s one example of the many pardons granted to President Trump’s wealthy donors and political supporters.”

    Durbin continued, “And, of course, these pay-to-play pardons are in addition to the more than 1,500 January 6 rioters who received blanket pardons from President Trump, including 169 who violently assaulted law enforcement officials.”

    Durbin concluded, “If my colleagues are truly interested in issues of presidential succession and disability under the 25th Amendment, I would suggest they embark on this constitutional journey with a proposed amendment, not today’s political adventure.”

    Video of Durbin’s opening statement is available here.

    Audio of Durbin’s opening statement is available here.

    Footage of Durbin’s opening statement is available here for TV Stations.

    -30-

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: RIDOH and DEM Recommend Avoiding Contact with Slack Reservoir

    Source: US State of Rhode Island

    The Rhode Island Department of Health (RIDOH) and Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management (DEM) are advising people to avoid contact with Slack Reservoir in Smithfield/Johnston due to harmful algae blooms (HABs). HABs are caused by blue-green algae, also known as cyanobacteria, which are naturally present in bodies of water. HABs can produce toxins which can be harmful to humans and animals. Toxins and/or high cell counts have been detected by the RIDOH State Health Laboratory from water samples collected by DEM at this location.

    Use caution in all areas of Slack Reservoir as HABs can move locations in ponds and lakes. All recreation, including swimming, fishing, boating and kayaking, is high risk to health and recommended to be avoided at this location. People should not drink untreated water or eat fish from affected waterbodies. Pet owners should not allow pets to drink or swim in this water. This advisory recommendation remains in effect until further notice.

    Skin contact with water containing blue-green algae can cause irritation of the skin, nose, eyes, and throat. Symptoms can include stomachache, diarrhea, vomiting, and nausea. Less common symptoms can include dizziness, headache, fever, liver damage, and nervous system damage. Young children and pets are at higher risk for health effects associated with HABs because they are more likely to swallow water when they are in or around bodies of water. People who have had contact with these ponds and experience those symptoms should contact their healthcare provider.

    If you or your pet come into contact with an algal bloom (HAB):

    — Rinse your skin with clean water right away. — Shower and wash your cloths when you get home. — If your pet was exposed, wash it with clean water immediately and don’t let it lick algae from its fur. — Call a vet if your pet shows signs of illness like tiredness, no eating, vomiting, diarrhea or other symptoms within a day. — If you feel sick after contact, call a healthcare provider.

    Other HABs may be affecting other waterbodies in Rhode Island. Affected waters might look bright to dark green, with thick algae floating on the surface. It may resemble green paint, pea soup, or green cottage cheese. If you see water like this, people and pets should avoid contact with the water.

    To report suspected blue-green algae blooms, contact DEM’s Office of Water Resources at 401-222-4700 Press 6 or DEM.OWRCyano@dem.ri.gov and if possible, send a photograph of the reported algae bloom. For more information and the Cyanobacteria Tracker Dashboard that lists current advisories and data, visit: www.dem.ri.gov/bluegreen

    ###

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Hoyle, Schatz, Smith Introduce New Legislation to Reduce Economic Inequality and Make Wall Street Pay Its Fair Share

    Source: US Representative Val Hoyle (OR-04)

    June 18, 2025

    The Wall Street Tax Act aims to disincentivize dangerous, risky investments that threaten the stability of the U.S. economy

    For Immediate Release: June 18, 2025 

    EUGENE, OR – Today, U.S. Representative Val Hoyle (OR-04), U.S. Senator Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii), and Rep. Adam Smith (WA-09) introducedThe Wall Street Tax Act (H.R. 4035), which would deliver hundreds of billions of dollars back to the American people by making Wall Street pay its fair share. The bill would create a progressive tax aimed at reducing the risky trading practices that threaten our economic stability while generating revenues that can be reinvested towards services for working people. Once fully implemented, the bill is projected to raise $750 billion over 10 years. 

    “While Republicans push another tax break for billionaires that would blow up the deficit, we’re offering a smarter path. The Wall Street Tax Act puts a price on the risky, high-speed trading that benefits Wall Street and leaves working families behind,” said Rep. Hoyle. “This small, targeted tax will raise hundreds of billions from those who can afford it and reinvest it in things that actually help people—like schools, housing, and infrastructure. Working families shouldn’t have to pay for Wall Street’s gambling.”

    “Wall Street routinely cashes in on high-risk trades that add no real value to our economy. It’s long past time we curbed this dangerous trading to reduce market volatility and encourage investment that actually helps our economy grow,” said Senator Schatz. “Republicans are racing to enrich billionaires and corporations by ripping regular people off. We’re doing the opposite: raising new revenue from Wall Street to reinvest in our communities.”

    “It’s past time for the wealthiest to pay their fair share, which is why I’m proud to support the Wall Street Tax Act, which targets high-risk trades that create high volatility and instability in the markets,” said Rep. Smith. “I’ll continue to fight for a fairer economy that works for everyone and reflects the values of the communities I serve.”

    “Instead of the proposed heartless cuts to services that help vulnerable communities and everyday people—like Medicaid and nutrition assistance—that Congress is currently debating, there is another route that lawmakers can and must pursue: raising taxes on corporations and the super-rich—including Wall Street high rollers,” said Susan Harley, managing director of Public Citizen’s Congress Watch division. “The Wall Street Tax Act would generate hundreds of billions of dollars that could be used to expand programs that improve the lives of Americans and it has the simultaneous benefit of reducing harmful high-speed trading that hurts investors and increases risk in our markets.”

    This bill is cosponsored by U.S. Representatives Frost (D-FL), Jayapal (D-CA), McGovern (D-MA), Pingree (D-MN), Schakowsky (D-IL), Tlaib (D-MI), Watson Coleman (D-NJ) and by U.S. Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), John Fetterman (D-Pa.), and Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.).

    The Wall Street Tax Act is currently endorsed by 32 organizations, including:Affordable Homeownership Foundation, AFL-CIO, American Family Voices, American Federation of Teachers, Americans for Financial Reform, Americans for Tax Fairness (ATF), Blue Future, Chicago Political Economy Group, Child Labor Coalition, Citizens for Tax Justice, Coalition on Human Needs, Communications Workers of America (CWA), Consumer Action, Food & Water Watch, Greenpeace USA. Groundwork Collaborative, Institute for Policy Studies, Global Economy Project, Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy Medical Mission Sisters(Unit North America), National Consumers League, NETWORK Lobby for Catholic Social Justice, Our Revolution, Oxfam America, Public Citizen, Public Justice Center, Responsible Wealth, RootsAction, Take on Wall Street, Unitarian Universalists for Social Justice, United for a Fair Economy, United Church of Christ, and United Steelworkers International Union (USW).

    The Bill

    The Wall Street Tax Act will levy a 0.1% tax – phased in over five years–on the sale of stocks, bonds, and derivatives to discourage risky and unproductive trading practices and gives those profits back to the people. The tax would apply to the fair market value of assets. Initial public offerings (IPOs) and short-term debt would be exempted from the tax. 

    Background

    High frequency trading (HFT) is a type of asset trading that uses supercomputers and specialized algorithms to make large, high-volume trades in a fraction of a second. HFT allows corporations and the ultra-wealthy to benefit from minor fluctuations in stock prices by allowing them to buy and sell in large volumes to make larger profits off of small differences. These practices create undue market volatility, which overwhelmingly hurts everyday investors who are unable to trade as quickly.

    In addition, these speculative, high-volume trading practices add little to no real value to the U.S. economy because the gains from them are centralized within the hands of a wealthy few. However, these high stakes games do have a real impact, as their asset prices react to the trades. The volatility these trades causecan even lead to a “Flash Crash,” where such volatility prompts mass selloffs across the stock market. This volatility can affect the retirements, pensions, and investments of working people.

    The Wall Street Tax Act is considered a progressive tax, meaning lower income earners pay a lesser percentage of their income in taxes compared to those with higher incomes. 

    The full text of the bill can be found here.

    ###

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Financial news: Inflation continues to decline.

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: Central Bank of Russia –

    In May, the seasonally adjusted monthly price growth slowed to 4.5% on an annualized basis. Non-food items fell in price for the second month in a row. The rate of price increases for basic food products, household and medical services remained high.

    Annual inflation also continued to decline in May, but was still significantly above the target. The Bank of Russia intends to return inflation to 4.0% in 2026 and keep it close to this level thereafter.

    For more details, read the Bank of Russia’s information and analytical commentary “Dynamics of consumer prices”.

    Preview photo: Nejron Photo / Shutterstock / Fotodom

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    Please Note; This Information is Raw Content Directly from the Information Source. It is access to What the Source Is Stating and Does Not Reflect

    HTTPS: //vv. KBR.ru/Press/Event/? ID = 24714

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Gov. Kemp Announces Latest Workforce Housing Grant Awards

    Source: US State of Georgia

    ATLANTA – Governor Brian P. Kemp announced today the latest round of grant awards for the Rural Workforce Housing Initiative, totaling $6.5 million in infrastructure development and supporting 198 housing units across three communities. In line with prior awards, these recipients demonstrated strong collaboration and partnership with local real estate developers.

    “Every Georgian deserves to be able to live in the community where they work, and today’s announcement is just the latest reminder of our commitment to that idea,” said Governor Brian Kemp. “I’m grateful for those in the legislature who helped us fund the Rural Workforce Housing Initiative to meet the needs of hardworking families across our state who are benefitting from the historic job growth we’ve attracted. These particular grants will have a positive, generational impact on Hawkinsville, Hinesville, and Waynesboro in the years to come.”

    First announced by the Governor in 2023, the Rural Workforce Housing Initiative continues to be a catalyst for the development of critically needed workforce housing in communities across the state. The Georgia General Assembly approved $35.7 million to launch the initiative in the Amended Fiscal Year 2023 budget. In the 2025 session, the legislature approved $28 million in the Amended Fiscal Year 2025 budget and $6 million in the Fiscal Year 2026 budget for the program.

    “Through this important initiative, the OneGeorgia Authority continues to come alongside communities committed to growth and opportunity for their citizens,” said Department of Community Affairs Commissioner Christopher Nunn. “These communities have shown strong partnership and initiative, and we are proud to continue to help them achieve their vision of a prosperous future.”

    In addition to meeting OneGeorgia Authority requirements, applicants leveraged other funding sources to demonstrate community commitment to increasing access to affordable housing for workers. The use of funds is subject to all applicable state laws and regulations, as well as to the policies and requirements of the OneGeorgia Authority and the Department of Community Affairs. OneGeorgia funds must be utilized within the timeframe specified in the grant/loan award documentation, which is generally 30 months from the date of the award.

    Awards

    City of Leesburg

    The City of Leesburg was awarded $2,500,000 in OneGeorgia funds for water, sewer, drainage, and road infrastructure improvements to allow for the development of 66 units in the first phase of development in the 32 Crossing Subdivision on a total of 130 acres. Additional phases will allow for senior housing and commercial development.

    The Lamon Company is the developer on the project. The city and developer are contributing funds towards the project. All required zoning has been approved for the development.

    City of Greensboro

    The City of Greensboro will receive $2.5 million in OneGeorgia funds for water, sewer, roads, and drainage infrastructure improvements to allow for the development of 32 homes on 63 acres in the first phase of the Baynes Creek development. Additional phases will allow for the construction of 70 housing units.

    The Greene County Habitat for Humanity is the partner developer for this project. The total infrastructure costs are $3,442,360 with the city and the developer making a contribution to this cost. All required zoning has been approved, and the clearing and grubbing have already begun on the site.

    Joint Development Authority of Gilmer County and the Cities of Ellijay and East Ellijay

    The Joint Development Authority was awarded $1,500,000 in OneGeorgia funds to construct drainage, water, and sewer infrastructure improvements. This investment will enable the construction of 30 townhomes on a total of 3.04 acres.

    The total infrastructure project costs are $2,329,645 for all necessary infrastructure improvements. The cities of Ellijay and East Ellijay, along with Gilmer County, are contributing to these costs.  New Beginnings, the partner developer for this project, will also contribute funding to the project.  Zoning is approved for the project.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: $11 Million Wastewater Treatment Project Completed

    Source: US State of New York

    overnor Kathy Hochul today announced construction is complete on an $11 million wastewater collection and treatment facilities improvement project in the Village of Waddington, St. Lawrence County, funded through the State’s Resiliency and Economic Development Initiative (REDI). The wastewater treatment collection system and treatment plant are owned and operated by the Village of Waddington. The project brings the aging infrastructure in compliance with current standards, protecting public health and promoting potential economic growth.

    “New York State is committed to building stronger, more resilient shoreline communities along the St. Lawrence River and across the state,” Governor Hochul said. “Through the REDI program, we are delivering smart, forward-looking solutions that help communities thrive in the face of climate challenges. These investments not only safeguard public health and infrastructure, but they also support long-term sustainability and environmental resiliency.”

    Due to its proximity to the St. Lawrence River, the wastewater treatment infrastructure was negatively impacted by high water levels and flooding, creating infiltration and inflow issues which were worsened by the lack of storm sewers in the Village of Waddington. The project implements flood resiliency measures designed to reduce the impact of future high water events.

    Resiliency measures for this project included:

    • Replacement and rehabilitation of the existing 100-year-old clay tile sewer main collection system with new and relined sewer mains and manholes to reduce ground water infiltration and inflow associated with high water levels;
    • Construction of new storm sewers and catch basins adequately sized to convey surface runoff and inflow from sump pumps, roof drains and area drains, to reduce unwanted storm flows into sanitary system;
    • Pump replacements and controls, new meters, new alarms, and new windows, doors and roofs at all seven pump stations throughout the collection system;
    • Upgrades to the main pump station in the collection system including a new permanent emergency generator with automatic transfer switch; and
    • Improvements to the treatment plant to replace or repair aging infrastructure designed to protect critical wastewater treatment systems from flooding events, including complete outfall pipe replacement of over 700 feet of piping and new disinfection system.

    This project was completed with oversight by the Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC). Grant funding was administered through the Environmental Facilities Corporation (EFC).

    Department of Environmental Conservation Commissioner and REDI Commission Co-Chair Amanda Lefton said, “The critical investment in Waddington’s wastewater infrastructure is a powerful example of how the State’s REDI Program strengthens community resilience while safeguarding water quality and public health. By addressing vulnerabilities worsened by flooding, this project ensures long term environmental protection and supports sustainable growth in the North Country.”

    Empire State Development President, CEO & Commissioner Hope Knight said, “Today’s announcement is a testament to Governor Hochul’s commitment to providing real solutions that position shoreline communities for growth, prosperity, and resiliency in the face of increased fluctuation in water levels on Lake Ontario and the St. Lawrence River. The dozens of completed REDI projects are strengthening local economies, protecting public health, improving habitat, and safeguarding vital infrastructure. The communities that have benefited look forward to improved sustainability and growth.”

    New York State Environmental Facilities Corporation President and CEO Maureen A. Coleman said, “Thanks to Governor Hochul’s commitment to building stronger, more resilient communities, the Village of Waddington now has modern wastewater infrastructure that’s built to withstand future flooding — and it came at minimal cost to local ratepayers. By funding these critical upgrades through REDI, we’re not only safeguarding public health and the environment, but also ensuring long-term affordability while preparing for the challenges of extreme weather.”

    New York Power Authority President and CEO and St. Lawrence County REDI Commissioner Justin E. Driscoll said, “Under Governor Hochul’s leadership, and through the Resiliency and Economic Development, New York State continues to partner with Lake Ontario and St. Lawrence River shoreline communities to harden, upgrade, and protect vulnerable infrastructure against high water conditions and flooding. This $11 million investment in the wastewater treatment collection system and treatment plant in Waddington will protect public health and ensure residents in the region benefit from the replacement of aging water and sewer infrastructure.”

    St. Lawrence County Chairman David Forsythe said, “The completion of the $11 million REDI wastewater infrastructure project marks a significant investment in the future of Waddington and St. Lawrence County. This project strengthens our environmental resilience, supports economic growth, and protects the health of our communities for generations to come. We are proud to see this vision realized.”

    Village of Waddington Mayor Mike Zagrobelny said, “On behalf of the Village of Waddington, I would like to thank Governor Hochul and the REDI Commission for funding this vital project. This upgrade completes half of the needed improvements to sewer and stormwater treatment within the Village. While the project helps to mitigate effects of changing water levels in the St. Lawrence, it also upgrades century old infrastructure and promotes retail and housing growth within the Village. As Mayor, I’m grateful for the many programs that the State of New York has provided Waddington that recognize the significance of our past and the bright promise of our future.”

    In response to the extended pattern of flooding along the shores of Lake Ontario and the St. Lawrence River, New York State established REDI to increase the resilience of shoreline communities and bolster economic development in the region. Five REDI Regional Planning Committees, composed of representatives from eight counties (Niagara and Orleans, Monroe, Wayne, Cayuga and Oswego, and Jefferson and St. Lawrence) were established to identify local priorities, at-risk infrastructure and other assets, and public safety concerns. Through REDI, the State has committed up to $300 million to benefit communities and improve resiliency in flood prone regions along Lake Ontario and the St. Lawrence River.

    Since the creation of the State’s REDI program in the Spring of 2019, 134 REDI funded local and regional projects are underway, including 16 projects in the design phase, 7 projects in the construction phase, and 111 projects completed. All ten of the projects awarded in St. Lawrence County are complete.

    For additional information, project profiles and REDI news, click here.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Reimaging Rochester with Bull’s Head Empowerment Center

    Source: US State of New York

    overnor Kathy Hochul today announced a transformational $23.6 million project to establish the Bull’s Head Empowerment Center on Clifton Street in Rochester. The Empowerment Center, located within the City’s 12.8-acre Bull’s Head Neighborhood Brownfield Opportunity Area, will see the adaptive reuse and expansion of an existing building into a fully occupied mixed-use center that will house workforce development programming, not-for-profit services, and local businesses. Confirmed tenants include a construction workforce development center, two construction firms, and several non-profit organizations, a 24-hour daycare operated by Action for a Better Community, and a proposed coffee shop. New York State is providing $3 million for the project through the Regional Revitalization Partnership (RRP) initiative.

    “The public-private Regional Revitalization Partnership is serving as a national model and catalyst for economic development,” Governor Hochul said. “This investment in the Bull’s Head Empowerment Center in Rochester represents another shining example of the initiative’s success. By targeting these neighborhoods in Rochester, Buffalo and Niagara Falls, New York State is lifting up and transforming disadvantaged communities, building a more equitable future for all New Yorkers.”

    The project, led by USC Builds, a certified New York State Minority and Women-Owned Business Enterprise (MWBE) member, serves as an early anchor for the City’s $350 million Bull’s Head Revitalization Plan aimed at helping to create equitable and enhanced job and business opportunities, provide quality housing and improved public infrastructure. The center is expected to be operational in the spring of 2027.

    USC Builds President Melissa Suchodolski said, “We are deeply grateful to Empire State Development for this $3 million investment in the Bull’s Head Empowerment Center. This support marks a meaningful step toward realizing our vision for 160 Clifton Street — a space where equity and economic opportunity can take root. By bringing workforce training, affordable childcare and local business support under one roof, we’re laying the foundation for a community resource designed to meet real needs in one of Rochester’s most historically disinvested neighborhoods.”

    Action for a Better Community President and CEO Jerome Underwood said, “For anyone who has lived in Rochester for the past 30 years the revitalization of the Bulls Head Plaza has been a long time coming. As we mark Action for a Better Community’s 60th anniversary of services to the Rochester community we are thrilled to be an integral part of this development. ABC looks forward to providing high quality and affordable childcare to those who so desperately need it. We applaud the vision of the development team and the wisdom of the State to fund this crucial project.”

    The Empowerment Center is directly adjacent to the West Main Gateway project, which received an RRP investment of $10 million. The project is designed to help revitalize the West Main Street Corridor from West Genesee Street to West Broad Street, a historically significant but long-underinvested area of Rochester.

    Phase one of Rochester’s approved RRP includes 14 projects totaling over $40 million in investment across key commercial corridors, riverfront activation, and workforce development. A full list of projects can be found here.

    Overall, Rochester is set to receive a combined $80 million RRP investment, which includes major additional investments in the City’s ongoing waterfront efforts, such as ROC the Riverway and High Falls State Park; further support for multi-faceted workforce training programs and facilities; and targeted small business assistance along commercial corridors in that city’s most disadvantaged neighborhoods. OneROC serves as the regional intermediary for the RRP in Greater Rochester, ensuring that investments are strategically aligned, collaborative, and impactful.

    Rochester Mayor Malik D. Evans said, “The Bull’s Head Empowerment Center will play a critical role to restore the historic Bull’s Head neighborhood to its place of prominence as Rochester’s western gateway. I want to thank Governor Kathy Hochul and Empire State Development President Hope Knight for making the critical investments to make this project a reality. I’m also grateful for the leadership of USC Builds owner Melissa Suchodolski, who was born and raised in the 19th Ward, for her determination to move this project forward and provide the people of Bulls Head the signs of progress that they deserve.”

    The RRP is a $300 million public-private partnership designed to maximize social and economic impact efforts in Rochester, Buffalo and Niagara Falls, by co-investing in projects and programs aimed at improving economic conditions to benefit these communities’ residents and businesses. Overall, New York State has committed $200 million for the initiative and Ralph C. Wilson, Jr. Foundation, along with other philanthropic and corporate partners, have committed $81 million. The remaining $19 million is coming from city and county governments.

    The Three Pillars of the Program:

    • Fostering small businesses, by providing programs to help improve and grow these enterprises, especially those owned by women and people of color, which expand choices for goods and services to these neighborhoods, revenue and income for community members, and job opportunities.
    • Investing in placemaking, by funding improvements to local business districts, rebuilding community anchors and revitalizing neighborhoods.
    • Preparing our workforce, by enhancing local residents’ skills and improving their access to opportunities for good-paying jobs.

    Additional information is available regarding RRP funding available here.

    Empire State Development President, Commissioner and CEO Hope Knight said, “The Regional Revitalization Partnership is a game-changing initiative. This targeted investment in Rochester’s Bull’s Head neighborhood will support the people, places, and businesses that are dedicated to ensuring that this neglected area can now truly thrive. This inclusive, collaborative effort is stimulating economic revitalization in Rochester, Buffalo and Niagara Falls, creating real opportunity for hope one community at a time.”

    State Senator Jeremy Cooney said, “The Bull’s Head Empowerment Center will be a gamechanger for workforce development, small businesses, and the continued revitalization of the surrounding neighborhood. I want to thank Governor Hochul and the work of the Regional Revitalization Partnership to make this project a reality and deliver on behalf of our community.”

    Assemblymember Harry Bronson said, “The Bull’s Head Empowerment Center represents the transformative impact of partnerships between public and private stakeholders, helping to grow our middle class through workforce development programs, expanding employment opportunities, bolstering our economy, and strengthening our neighborhoods. We must have an economy that works for everyone, and the Regional Revitalization Partnership’s investment creates a multiplier effect that uplifts residents and small businesses.”

    Assemblymember Demond Meeks said, “The Bull’s Head Empowerment Center is a long-overdue investment that will help revitalize one of Rochester’s most historic yet underserved neighborhoods. By transforming vacant space into a hub for workforce training, childcare, and local business support, this project will breathe new life into the Bull’s Head area. It’s about restoring pride, creating opportunity, and making sure longtime residents see real, lasting change in their community.”

    Monroe County Executive Adam Bello said, “This investment in the Bull’s Head neighborhood will build upon the revitalization of this important section of the West Main Street corridor. The Bull’s Head Empowerment Center will serve as a cornerstone for area residents, providing workforce training, retail businesses and support services. I want to thank Governor Kathy Hochul, Empire State Development President & CEO Hope Knight and the team at USC Builds for coming together to support the redevelopment of this historic neighborhood.”

    OneROC President and CEO Joe Stefko said, “The Bull’s Head Empowerment Center embodies exactly what the Regional Revitalization Partnership was designed to do – align public, private, and philanthropic partners to invest in transformational projects and maximize community impact. Thank you to Governor Hochul and Empire State Development for their continued leadership and commitment to bringing new life to a storied Rochester neighborhood and creating space for small businesses, workforce training, and vital community services. OneROC is proud to work alongside USC Builds and the City of Rochester to build on the new West Main Gateway project and make this bold vision a reality.”

    About the Regional Revitalization Partnership (RRP)

    The Regional Revitalization Partnership (RRP) is a $300M comprehensive economic development strategy and public-private partnership that maximizes impact and leverages additional investment for Buffalo’s East Side, Niagara Falls and Rochester. This community-driven, collaborative strategy takes a holistic approach to economic development and is designed to build community wealth through multiple paths. The RRP was developed in collaboration with New York State Governor Kathy Hochul and Empire State Development (ESD) and is supported by ESL, Evans Bank, Max and Marian Farash Charitable Foundation, Five Star Bank, John R. Oishei Foundation, KeyBank/First Niagara Foundation, William & Sheila Konar Foundation, M&T Bank, Ralph C. Wilson, Jr. Foundation, and partners in the cities of Buffalo, Niagara Falls, and Rochester. RRP program implementation is led by the Center for Regional Strategies.

    Accelerating Economic Development in the Finger Lakes

    Today’s announcement complements “Finger Lakes Forward,” the region’s comprehensive strategy to generate robust economic growth and community development. The regionally designed plan focuses on investing in key industries including photonics, agriculture‎ and food production, and advanced manufacturing. More information is available here.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-Evening Report: What happens when aid is cut to a large refugee camp? Kenyan study paints a bleak picture

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Olivier Sterck, Associate professor, University of Oxford

    Humanitarian needs are rising around the world. At the same time, major donors such as the US and the UK are pulling back support, placing increasing strain on already overstretched aid systems.

    Global humanitarian needs have quadrupled since 2015, driven by new conflicts in Sudan, Ukraine and Gaza. Added to these are protracted crises in Yemen, Somalia, South Sudan, and DR Congo, among others. Yet donor funding has failed to keep pace, covering less than half of the requested US$50 billion in 2024, leaving millions without assistance.

    Notably, the US recently slashed billions of US dollars from global relief efforts. The slashed contributions once made up to half of all public humanitarian funding and over a fifth of the UN’s budget. Other donors have been cutting aid as well.

    As funding shortfalls widen, humanitarian agencies increasingly face tough choices: reducing the scale of operations, pausing essential services, or cancelling programmes altogether. Disruptions to aid delivery have become a routine feature of humanitarian operations.

    Yet few rigorous studies have provided hard evidence of the consequences for affected populations.

    A recent study from one of the world’s largest refugee camps in Kenya fills this gap.

    Our research team from the University of Oxford and the University of Antwerp was already studying Kakuma camp and then had an opportunity to see what happened when aid was cut. We observed the impact of a 20% aid cut that occurred in 2023.

    The study reveals that cuts to humanitarian assistance had dramatic impacts on hunger and psychological distress, with cascading effects on local credit systems and prices of goods.

    Kakuma refugee camp

    Kakuma is home to more than 300,000 refugees, who mostly came from South Sudan (49%), Somalia (16%), and the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) (10%). They have been housed here since 1992. With widespread poverty, lack of income opportunities, and aid making up over 90% of household income, survival in the camp hinges on humanitarian support from UN organisations.

    When the research began in late 2022, most refugees in Kakuma received a combination of in-kind and cash transfers from the World Food Programme. Transfers were worth US$17 per person per month, barely enough to cover the bare essentials: food, firewood and medicine.

    Over the span of a year, the research team tracked 622 South Sudanese refugee households, interviewing them monthly to monitor how their living conditions evolved in response to the timing and level of aid they received. We also gathered weekly price data on 70 essential goods and conducted more than 250 in-depth interviews with refugees, shopkeepers, and humanitarian staff to understand the broader impacts.

    Then came the cut. In July 2023, assistance was reduced by 20%, just as the research team was conducting its eighth round of data collection. This sudden reduction in humanitarian aid created a rare opportunity to assess the effects of an aid cut on both recipients and the markets they depend on.

    Consequences of aid cut

    The 20% cut in humanitarian aid had cascading effects, affecting not just hunger, but local credit systems, prices, and well-being.

    1. Hunger got worse. As a Somali refugee interviewed by the researchers put it: “After the aid reduction, the lives of refugees become hard. That was the money sustaining them. […] Things are insufficient, and hunger is visible.”

    Food insecurity was already widespread before the cut, with more than 90% of refugees classified as food insecure. Average caloric intake stood below 1,900 kcal per person per day – well under the World Food Programme’s 2,100 kcal target and about half the average daily calorie supply available to a US citizen.

    Food insecurity further increased following the aid cut, with caloric intake falling by 145 kcal, a 7% decrease. The share of households eating one meal or less increased by 8 percentage points, from about 29% to 37%. At the same time, dietary diversity narrowed, indicating that households tried to mitigate the negative impacts of the aid cut by reducing the variety of foods they consumed.

    2. Credit collapsed. As a refugee shopkeeper of Ethiopian origin reported: “When we give out credit we have a limit; since the aid is reduced, the credit is also reduced.”

    Cash assistance in Kakuma is delivered through aid cards, which refugees routinely use as collateral to access food on credit. When transfers are delayed or unexpected expenses arise, refugees hand over their aid cards as a guarantee to trusted shopkeepers, allowing them to borrow food against next month’s aid.

    But when assistance was cut, the value of this informal collateral plummeted. Retailers, fearing default, reduced lending or refused lending altogether. Informal credit from shopkeepers shrank by 9%. Many refugees reported being refused food on credit or having to repay past debt before receiving any new goods.

    3. Households liquidated assets. With no access to credit, households began selling off possessions and drawing down food reserves. The average value of household assets fell by over 6% after the aid cut.

    4. Psychological distress increased. The aid cut reduced self-reported sleep quality and happiness, indicating that reductions in aid go beyond physical impacts and also have psychological effects.

    5. Prices fell. With reduced expenditure and purchasing power, the demand for food dropped, and food prices went down, partially offsetting the negative effects of the aid cut.

    Implications

    The study carries two major policy implications.

    First, aid in contexts like Kakuma should not be treated as optional or discretionary, but as a structural necessity. It is the backbone of daily life. Mechanisms are needed to protect it from abrupt donor withdrawals.

    Second, informal credit is not peripheral, it is central to economic life in refugee settings. In many camps, shopkeepers act as retailers and de facto financial institutions. When aid transfers serve as both income and collateral, cutting them risks collapsing this fragile credit system. Cash transfer programmes must therefore be designed with these dynamics in mind.

    Olivier Sterck receives research funding from the IKEA Foundation, the World Bank, and The Research Foundation – Flanders (FWO).

    Vittorio Bruni is affiliated with Oxford University

    ref. What happens when aid is cut to a large refugee camp? Kenyan study paints a bleak picture – https://theconversation.com/what-happens-when-aid-is-cut-to-a-large-refugee-camp-kenyan-study-paints-a-bleak-picture-259055

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-Evening Report: What happens when aid is cut to a large refugee camp? Kenyan study paints a bleak picture

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Olivier Sterck, Associate professor, University of Oxford

    Humanitarian needs are rising around the world. At the same time, major donors such as the US and the UK are pulling back support, placing increasing strain on already overstretched aid systems.

    Global humanitarian needs have quadrupled since 2015, driven by new conflicts in Sudan, Ukraine and Gaza. Added to these are protracted crises in Yemen, Somalia, South Sudan, and DR Congo, among others. Yet donor funding has failed to keep pace, covering less than half of the requested US$50 billion in 2024, leaving millions without assistance.

    Notably, the US recently slashed billions of US dollars from global relief efforts. The slashed contributions once made up to half of all public humanitarian funding and over a fifth of the UN’s budget. Other donors have been cutting aid as well.

    As funding shortfalls widen, humanitarian agencies increasingly face tough choices: reducing the scale of operations, pausing essential services, or cancelling programmes altogether. Disruptions to aid delivery have become a routine feature of humanitarian operations.

    Yet few rigorous studies have provided hard evidence of the consequences for affected populations.

    A recent study from one of the world’s largest refugee camps in Kenya fills this gap.

    Our research team from the University of Oxford and the University of Antwerp was already studying Kakuma camp and then had an opportunity to see what happened when aid was cut. We observed the impact of a 20% aid cut that occurred in 2023.

    The study reveals that cuts to humanitarian assistance had dramatic impacts on hunger and psychological distress, with cascading effects on local credit systems and prices of goods.

    Kakuma refugee camp

    Kakuma is home to more than 300,000 refugees, who mostly came from South Sudan (49%), Somalia (16%), and the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) (10%). They have been housed here since 1992. With widespread poverty, lack of income opportunities, and aid making up over 90% of household income, survival in the camp hinges on humanitarian support from UN organisations.

    When the research began in late 2022, most refugees in Kakuma received a combination of in-kind and cash transfers from the World Food Programme. Transfers were worth US$17 per person per month, barely enough to cover the bare essentials: food, firewood and medicine.

    Over the span of a year, the research team tracked 622 South Sudanese refugee households, interviewing them monthly to monitor how their living conditions evolved in response to the timing and level of aid they received. We also gathered weekly price data on 70 essential goods and conducted more than 250 in-depth interviews with refugees, shopkeepers, and humanitarian staff to understand the broader impacts.

    Then came the cut. In July 2023, assistance was reduced by 20%, just as the research team was conducting its eighth round of data collection. This sudden reduction in humanitarian aid created a rare opportunity to assess the effects of an aid cut on both recipients and the markets they depend on.

    Consequences of aid cut

    The 20% cut in humanitarian aid had cascading effects, affecting not just hunger, but local credit systems, prices, and well-being.

    1. Hunger got worse. As a Somali refugee interviewed by the researchers put it: “After the aid reduction, the lives of refugees become hard. That was the money sustaining them. […] Things are insufficient, and hunger is visible.”

    Food insecurity was already widespread before the cut, with more than 90% of refugees classified as food insecure. Average caloric intake stood below 1,900 kcal per person per day – well under the World Food Programme’s 2,100 kcal target and about half the average daily calorie supply available to a US citizen.

    Food insecurity further increased following the aid cut, with caloric intake falling by 145 kcal, a 7% decrease. The share of households eating one meal or less increased by 8 percentage points, from about 29% to 37%. At the same time, dietary diversity narrowed, indicating that households tried to mitigate the negative impacts of the aid cut by reducing the variety of foods they consumed.

    2. Credit collapsed. As a refugee shopkeeper of Ethiopian origin reported: “When we give out credit we have a limit; since the aid is reduced, the credit is also reduced.”

    Cash assistance in Kakuma is delivered through aid cards, which refugees routinely use as collateral to access food on credit. When transfers are delayed or unexpected expenses arise, refugees hand over their aid cards as a guarantee to trusted shopkeepers, allowing them to borrow food against next month’s aid.

    But when assistance was cut, the value of this informal collateral plummeted. Retailers, fearing default, reduced lending or refused lending altogether. Informal credit from shopkeepers shrank by 9%. Many refugees reported being refused food on credit or having to repay past debt before receiving any new goods.

    3. Households liquidated assets. With no access to credit, households began selling off possessions and drawing down food reserves. The average value of household assets fell by over 6% after the aid cut.

    4. Psychological distress increased. The aid cut reduced self-reported sleep quality and happiness, indicating that reductions in aid go beyond physical impacts and also have psychological effects.

    5. Prices fell. With reduced expenditure and purchasing power, the demand for food dropped, and food prices went down, partially offsetting the negative effects of the aid cut.

    Implications

    The study carries two major policy implications.

    First, aid in contexts like Kakuma should not be treated as optional or discretionary, but as a structural necessity. It is the backbone of daily life. Mechanisms are needed to protect it from abrupt donor withdrawals.

    Second, informal credit is not peripheral, it is central to economic life in refugee settings. In many camps, shopkeepers act as retailers and de facto financial institutions. When aid transfers serve as both income and collateral, cutting them risks collapsing this fragile credit system. Cash transfer programmes must therefore be designed with these dynamics in mind.

    Olivier Sterck receives research funding from the IKEA Foundation, the World Bank, and The Research Foundation – Flanders (FWO).

    Vittorio Bruni is affiliated with Oxford University

    ref. What happens when aid is cut to a large refugee camp? Kenyan study paints a bleak picture – https://theconversation.com/what-happens-when-aid-is-cut-to-a-large-refugee-camp-kenyan-study-paints-a-bleak-picture-259055

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-Evening Report: Tracing the Drax family’s millions – a story of British landed gentry, slavery and sugar plantations

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Paul Lashmar, Reader in Journalism, City St George’s, University of London

    ‘Planting the sugar-cane’: vast fortunes were made from the trades in both sugar and human slaves in the Americas. Schomburg Center for Research in Black Culture, Photographs and Prints Division, The New York Public Library

    Rich British aristocratic families with a legacy of owning colonial slave plantations are often accused by campaigners that their wealth solely originates from these plantations. One frequent target of this criticism has been the Drax family of Dorset, which is headed by Richard Grosvenor Plunkett-Ernle-Erle-Drax, who was the Conservative MP for South Dorset until July 2024.

    Historian Alan Lester of the University of Sussex has noted of Drax (as he is commonly known): “Much of his fortune is inherited, coming down the family line from ownership of the Drax sugar plantations and the 30,000 enslaved people who worked them as Drax property for 180 years before emancipation in Barbados.”

    Recently, I have researched and written a book on the Drax family’s history and involvement in the slave trade in the Caribbean, Drax of Drax Hall, that gives fresh insights into the level of wealth they derived from the sugar trade and the trade in African slaves who worked their plantations – as well as the family’s other income sources.

    I searched the archives in the UK and Caribbean for evidence of their revenue streams until Britain’s 1834 abolition of slavery in the colonies. I estimate that the family today are worth more than £150 million from their land and property in Dorset and Yorkshire.


    Get your news from actual experts, straight to your inbox. Sign up to our daily newsletter to receive all The Conversation UK’s latest coverage of news and research, from politics and business to the arts and sciences.


    Over a period of two centuries until 1834, eight generations of Drax ancestors owned and worked hundreds of enslaved African captives at any one time. The latest beneficiary of primogeniture – the legal concept that recognises the first-born child as heir to a familiy’s fortune – Richard Drax inherited the family’s still-operating 621-acre Drax Hall plantation in Barbados in 2021.

    Drax, 67, has said: “I am keenly aware of the slave trade in the West Indies, and the role my very distant ancestor played in it is deeply, deeply regrettable. But no one can be held responsible today for what happened many hundreds of years ago. This is a part of the nation’s history, from which we must all learn.”

    My research reveals the sources of his family’s wealth are more complex than the critics’ claims that it all derives from the slave-worked plantations.

    Like most British landed gentry, much of the Drax family income has come as extensive landlords of their British estates which, in 1883, exceeded 23,000 acres across various counties. Today, it includes nearly 16,000 acres in Dorset and 2,520 acres in the Yorkshire Dales.

    However, my research also shows the Drax family made more money from slavery than was previously thought, when taking into account the way revenues from their plantations were channelled into the family’s British estates over the two centuries of slavery.

    Drax Hall plantation in Barbados

    The Drax Hall plantation in the Barbados parish of Saint George has been described by Barbadian historian Sir Hilary Beckles, chair of the Caribbean Community reparations commission, as a “killing field” where as many as 30,000 slaves died in brutal conditions. Despite pressure from reparation campaigners in the Caribbean, Britain and elsewhere, Richard Drax has declined to make a formal public apology or gesture of recompense in the Caribbean for the years of slavery.

    A 19th-century drawing of Drax Hall plantation in Barbados.
    Unknown source, Wikimedia Commons

    As the prime minister of Barbados, Mia Mottley, explained in April 2024, despite the efforts of her government Drax has yet to agree to a settlement, pay reparations or contribute all or part of his family’s Drax Hall plantation to provide affordable housing or become a memorial to those who worked and died in colonial enslavement on the island.

    Some other British landed families whose ancestors owned slave plantations in the Caribbean, including the Trevelyans (who owned six slave plantations in Grenada) and the Gladstones (British prime minister William Gladstone’s father owned plantations in Guyana), have made formal apologies and reparations. And while some families have kept the terms of these reparations private, longtime BBC reporter Laura Trevelyan made a US$100,000 (£73,000) donation to a Caribbean development fund.

    The largest family estate

    Four thousand miles from Barbados, Richard Drax lives in Charborough House, a historic 17th-century mansion in Dorset. He oversees the 23.5-square mile estate, the largest family estate in Dorset with over 120 properties, many of which are rented out.

    Charborough was acquired by Drax’s ancestor Walter Erle by marriage in 1549. The family has gradually increased the estate over the centuries. Historically, their income comes from renting land to tenant farmers and cottages to agricultural workers. This, I identified, is where the bulk of their income has come from.

    Charborough House: the Drax family seat in Dorset.
    John Lamper/Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA

    However, profits from sugar produced by slavery also poured into the family coffers over 200 years. Richard Drax’s remote ancestor James Drax (1609-1661) was one of the first settler group to arrive in the then-uninhabited island of Barbados in 1627. In his introduction to my book, TV historian David Olusoga writes that the Drax family were key players – arguably the key players – in the origin story of British slavery:

    The Drax Hall plantation, the first estate on which a crop of sugar was commercially grown and processed by any English planter, became one of the laboratories in which early English slavery was developed and finessed.

    Built around 1650, the Jacobean plantation house is thought to be the one of the three oldest extant residential buildings in the Americas. From the 17th into the 18th century, the Draxes created and owned the largest acreage in Barbados with the Drax Hall and and Mount plantations – plus a 3,000-acre estate, also called Drax Hall, in Jamaica. The family became enormously wealthy: James Drax was said by a visitor to Drax Hall in the 1640s to “live like a prince”, putting on lavish dinners for friends and guests.

    In addition to owning slaves, James Drax shipped African captives to Barbados as a key part of the trade in slaves. Knighted by both Oliver Cromwell and Charles I, by 1660 he was a director and investor in the English East India Company which, in part, traded and exploited enslaved people.

    Paul Lashmar’s book, Drax of Drax Hall.
    Bookshop.com

    In her 1930 study, American historian Elizabeth Donnan presented evidence that the Draxes of the 17th century operated “off the books” – buying enslaved people from, and selling them to, “interloper” ships that circumvented the Royal African Company’s monopoly of slave trading to the colonies.

    The Drax family married into the Erle family in 1719, combining three fortunes: that of the Erles of Charborough, the Draxes of Yorkshire, Barbados and Jamaica, and the landed-gentry Ernles of Wiltshire.

    Despite being deeply involved in the South Sea Bubble scandal, the Drax family flourished. The slave registers in the National Archives show that between 1825 and 1834, the Drax Hall plantation in Barbados produced an average of 163 tonnes of sugar and 4,845 gallons of rum per year. This gave the family an average annual net profit of £3,591 – equivalent to about £600,000 now. Today, the plantation still produces 700 tonnes of sugar a year, earning the family something in the region of £250,000.

    Pressure for reparations

    In recent years, the value of Drax Hall’s land in Barbados has greatly increased as it is sought after for housing, and could now be worth as much as Bds$150,000 (£60,000) per acre. At the same time, pressure for reparations is growing. In 2023, the African Union threw its weight behind the Caribbean reparations campaign.

    David Comissiong, deputy chairman of the Barbados reparations task force, has said: “Other families are involved, though not as prominently as the Draxes. This reparations journey has begun.”

    Yet to date, the only reparations paid in the story of the Drax family’s involvement in the slave trade were to the family itself. In 1837, Jane-Frances Erle-Drax, the heiress of Charborough, received £4,293 12s 6d (worth more than £614,000 today) in reparations for freeing 189 slaves from Drax Hall plantation after the abolition of slavery in the colonies.

    In the course of researching and writing my book, I approached Richard Drax both directly and through his lawyers and put the claims made here to him. He had no comment to add.

    This page contains references to books included for editorial reasons, which may include links to bookshop.org. If you click on one of the links and go on to buy something from bookshop.org, The Conversation UK may earn a commission.

    Paul Lashmar is affiliated with the Labour Party.

    ref. Tracing the Drax family’s millions – a story of British landed gentry, slavery and sugar plantations – https://theconversation.com/tracing-the-drax-familys-millions-a-story-of-british-landed-gentry-slavery-and-sugar-plantations-257376

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-Evening Report: Kicked out for coming out: more than half of LGBTIQ+ flatmates face discrimination for their identity

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Brodie Fraser, Senior Research Fellow, He Kāinga Oranga Housing and Health Research Programme, University of Otago

    Sangar Akreyi/Getty Images

    People who belong to the LGBTIQ+ community say flatting is fraught with difficulties that go well beyond learning new routines and sharing space with strangers.

    Our new research on the flatting experiences of the LGBTIQ+ community found many experienced discrimination – with some opting to sleep rough rather than remain living with discriminatory flatmates.

    Our survey results highlight the ongoing challenges faced by this community, and the choices they face when it comes to their living arrangements.

    Shared spaces

    It is difficult to say exactly how many New Zealanders are in a flatting situation. But data from the 2023 Census indicates 17.2% of households (293,244) include some sort of non-family sharing arrangement.

    Flatting adds an extra layer of instability to New Zealand’s already mobile housing culture, where the median tenancy is 25 months. Many people in flatting situations are not named on tenancy agreements and are vulnerable to being asked to leave by fellow flatmates.

    Of the 900 LGBTIQ+ people over the age of 16 we surveyed, 33% (298) lived in a flatting situation.

    Those who were flatting were significantly more likely to be younger and to be non-binary or identify with a gender other than male or female (34.6%), compared to those who were not flatting (24.8%).

    The flatters in our survey had lower incomes than non-flatters, with a higher proportion of incomes under NZ$20,000 annually (33.9% compared to 16.8% of non-flatters). They also had a lower proportion of incomes over NZD$100,000 annually (2.3% compared to 14.4% of non-flatters).

    People who responded to our survey also reported high levels of homelessness, with 37.47% saying they had experienced it during their lifetime.

    Unsafe at home

    More than half (52%) the flatters in our survey said they had experienced some kind of discrimination in their living situation, with 23.8% saying it came directly from their flatmates.

    As one of our research participants said:

    I moved once, in large part because a flatmate expressed homophobic views when I was not out. They said they wouldn’t be comfortable with a gay couple moving in.

    Another explained:

    I’ve had homosexual flatmates tell me they “know my secret” and tell me angrily that I’ve been “lying to them the whole time” just because I didn’t tell them I was trans.

    But discrimination didn’t just come from flatmates. Survey respondents expressed concern about visitors to to their homes.

    As one said:

    An old flatmate’s girlfriend was visibly uncomfortable interacting with me, and my flatmate used to tell me about the awful things that her family would say about trans people. I used to hate it when she came over.

    A different participant said:

    My flatmate’s boyfriend often made questionable comments about queer people in front of me and she did nothing to stop it, and often would tell me things that he said, like I would think it was funny or wouldn’t be hurt.

    The threat of homelessness loomed over the LGBTIQ+ people who were flatting. Over half the flatters in our survey said they moved due to difficult relationships with flatmates.

    But moving was not always a choice. Some of our survey participants said they were asked to leave because of their gender identity or sexual preference.

    One said suspicion was enough to make them vulnerable:

    [I was] asked to leave a flat when someone suspected I was “a faggot”.

    Another said coming out caused a rift in the flat:

    I was kicked out of a house when coming out as trans to my flatmates and asking they use my preferred name and pronouns.

    Tenancy protections needed

    Our research highlights just how vulnerable the LGBTIQ+ community continues to be in almost every aspect of their lives.

    But flatters, in general, have few protections. If a flatmate is not included in a tenancy agreement, they are not protected by the Residential Tenancy Act and have very limited legal protections.

    Improved rental laws could make it easier for tenants to change leases, allowing flatters to leave unsafe situations. Improvements could also make it easier to be included on leases so everyone living at a property is afforded the same protections under the Residential Tenancy Act.

    Brodie Fraser receives funding from the Ministry of Business, Innovation, and Employment Endeavour Fund for current work. This piece of research was funded by a University of Otago Division of Health Sciences Postdoctoral Fellowship, 2021.

    Mary Buchanan receives funding from the Ministry of Business, Innovation, and Employment Endeavour Fund, and the University of Otago.

    ref. Kicked out for coming out: more than half of LGBTIQ+ flatmates face discrimination for their identity – https://theconversation.com/kicked-out-for-coming-out-more-than-half-of-lgbtiq-flatmates-face-discrimination-for-their-identity-259133

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI USA: DIP Workshop Series 1: DIP Architecture and Date Integration Services

    Source: NASA

    StartNovember 17, 2021 at 10:00 AM EST
    EndNovember 17, 2021 at 12:00 PM EST

    The Digital Information Platform (DIP) workshop series is intended to provide a deeper dive and a closer look at some of the core features being developed by the DIP sub-project under ATM-X.
    These workshops will give insight into DIP development, technology, and assumptions as well as providing a forum for engaging with the DIP team to pose questions and provide feedback on proposed designs. Engagement with the broader aviation community is a critical component to success of the DIP sub-project!
    There will be several workshops within this series spanning a variety of topics. Participants are encouraged to sign up for any workshop topics they feel they could contribute to or provide feedback on.
    Please keep an eye on the DIP homepage, under the upcoming events section, for future announcements of additional workshop topics!

    This workshop will cover DIP architecture and data integration services. Participants will get a look at how the DIP architecture is set-up as well as how data integration services are planned to be hosted on the platform.
    The DIP architecture review is intended to cover how DIP was envisioned and how DIP is being developed to address data needs across the industry. Participants will have a chance to provide feedback on the DIP architecture and gain insight into how one might interface with the DIP to send or receive data.
    The data integration services portion is intended to cover DIP’s technical approach to data integration. As an example implementation, there will be a first look at possible data fusion on the platform , including utilizing NASA’s Fuser, and tailoring for industry data consumers. Descriptions, at a high-level, of input to and output of the Fuser will also be discussed.

    Participants interested in partnering with DIP and registering their service with the DIP platform are highly encouraged to attend this workshop. This is a unique opportunity for the aviation community to provide feedback and input on how this platform is structured to meet your needs.
    Data and service consumers as well as data and service providers are encouraged to attend this workshop to provide their feedback and input for DIP development.
    Participants looking to gain insight into upcoming DIP demonstrations or to learn more about DIP are encouraged to attend this workshop.

    Digital Information Platform
    Digital Information Platform Events

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: FEMA Assistance May Be Available for Losses Not Covered by Insurance

    Source: US Federal Emergency Management Agency

    Headline: FEMA Assistance May Be Available for Losses Not Covered by Insurance

    FEMA Assistance May Be Available for Losses Not Covered by Insurance

    OKLAHOMA CITY –If you sustained damage from the March 14-21 wildfires and straight-line winds, and initially did not receive FEMA assistance because of insurance coverage, you may now be eligible

    For residents in Cleveland, Creek, Lincoln, Logan, Oklahoma, Pawnee and Payne counties, if your insurance did not cover all damages or if your reimbursement is delayed, FEMA may be able to help

    While FEMA cannot duplicate insurance payments, it may be able to help where insurance did not

     You may be eligible for FEMA Individual Assistance if you:Were denied insurance benefits by your insurance company, orYour insurance claim has been settled and you can demonstrate to FEMA that your settlement didn’t cover your disaster-related essential needs

    Survivors who apply with FEMA may be eligible for Housing Assistance and Other Needs Assistance (ONA)

    Housing Assistance may include help with rentals, home repairs and home replacements

    ONA may include help with personal property, medical expenses, dental expenses, funeral expenses, childcare, transportation, and other miscellaneous items

    The first step is to contact your insurance company to request one of the following documents:A denial letter, or proof that you are not being covered by your insurance company

    A settlement letter, or exactly what is being covered by your insurance company

    A delay letter, or proof there has been no official decision yet by your insurance company on your insurance claim, and it has been more than 30 days from the time that you filed your insurance claim

    Any funds that you may receive from FEMA in this process would then be considered an advance and must be repaid when you get your settlement

    FEMA assistance is based on the specific information provided on each FEMA application, including the documentation provided by the applicant

    You can submit your documentation of denial letters, settlement letters or letters of delay:Online at DisasterAssistance

    gov

    By mail at: FEMA – Individuals and Households ProgramNational Processing Service Center P

    O

    Box 10055Hyattsville, MD 20782-7055By fax at 800-827-8112, Attention: FEMA – Individuals and Households Program

    By downloading the FEMA appYou can also speak with a FEMA specialist directly by calling the FEMA Helpline at 800-621-3362

     If you use a video relay service, captioned telephone service, or other communication services, please provide FEMA the specific number assigned for that service

     Lines are open daily from 6 a

    m

    to 10 p

    m

    CDT, seven days a week

    For the latest information, visit fema

    gov/disaster/4866

     Follow us on Twitter at twitter

    com/FEMARegion6 and like us on Facebook at facebook

    com/FEMARegion6

    thomas

    wise
    Wed, 06/18/2025 – 14:12

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: California breaks ground on two affordable housing communities in San Francisco — including for local school district, community college employees

    Source: US State of California 2

    Jun 18, 2025

    What you need to know: Two sites in San Francisco are the latest to be transformed under Governor Newsom’s executive order converting excess and underutilized state land into affordable housing. 

    SAN FRANCISCO — Today, Governor Gavin Newsom announced the groundbreaking of two new affordable housing communities in San Francisco’s Fillmore District. Utilizing Governor Newsom’s executive order from 2019 to spur the production of affordable housing in California, the formerly state-owned parking sites will be transformed into 167 homes for low- to extremely-low-income residents.

    “These projects are the latest testament to the innovative work happening across the state to make housing more affordable. The sites announced today help put a roof over people’s heads and place them in a stronger position for opportunities to uplift themselves, their families, and their community.”

    Governor Gavin Newsom

    The Excess Sites program is administered in partnership by the California Department of General Services (DGS) and the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD). The program identifies state-owned land available and suitable for housing and creates a digital inventory of those properties available through the State Excess Sites – Affordable Housing Opportunities Map Viewer. DGS and HCD review proposals for unawarded sites on a rolling basis.

    “Thanks to the Excess Sites program, the state has successfully converted underutilized state properties into community assets for current and future generations of Californians,” said Business, Consumer Services and Housing Agency Secretary Tomiquia Moss. “These projects in San Francisco will build much-needed affordable homes for people who often find it difficult to live in the very communities they serve.” 

    “As with our other affordable housing developments across the state, this project is a partnership that allows us to zero in on a community’s specific housing needs,” said Government Operations Agency Secretary Nick Maduros. “Providing convenient, affordable housing lightens a significant burden for these valued members of the local educational community.”

    Project details

    Rendering of the project at 750 Golden Gate Avenue

    At 750 Golden Gate Avenue, a surface parking lot will be replaced to create 75 affordable rental homes for San Francisco Unified School District (SFUSD) and San Francisco Community College District (SFCCD) employees. This will be the second educator-employee housing project to break ground in San Francisco. The second phase of this project will consist of building 96 affordable homes at an adjacent parcel at Golden Gate Avenue and Franklin Street.

    Rendering of the project at 850 Turk Street

    The second project to break ground—850 Turk Street—will be a 92-unit multifamily affordable housing development redeveloping the site of a former Employment Development Department (EDD) parking garage podium. The project will feature indoor and outdoor common areas, office space, residential service spaces, and a range of available amenities, including a private courtyard, rooftop terrace, and barbecue facilities. Both communities will be developed by MidPen Housing Corporation.

    “We are repurposing excess properties throughout the state to build affordable housing that California communities urgently need,” said DGS Director Ana M. Lasso. “DGS is enthusiastic to collaborate on a project that has the unique distinction of benefiting educators and employees of the SFUSD and SFCCD.”

     “Strong, healthy communities need teachers, firefighters, nurses, and others who have too often been priced out of living in the neighborhoods they serve,” said HCD Director Gustavo Velasquez. “We are honored to help implement the Governor’s vision to transform underutilized state land to meet this critical need for affordable housing options.”

    From state land to affordable housing

    In 2019, Governor Gavin Newsom issued an Executive Order N-06-19, which tasked HCD and DGS with tackling the state’s affordable housing crisis by identifying underutilized state-owned land that could be converted into affordable housing, with consideration to factors such as proximity to job centers, amenities, and public transit. The order has since been utilized to create hundreds of affordable homes, including:

    Recent news

    News SACRAMENTO – Governor Gavin Newsom recently wrote an op-ed on the dangers of President Trump’s reach at authoritarianism, as well as the solution that lies within the power of each citizen to hold their electeds accountable to the Constitution they have sworn…

    News Sacramento, California – El Gobernador Gavin Newsom escribió recientemente un artículo de opinión sobre los peligros del autoritarismo del Presidente Trump, así como la solución que reside en el poder de cada ciudadano de exigir a sus elegidos que rindan cuentas…

    News What you need to know: Governor Newsom announced that this year, the state recovered 113,245 stolen items worth nearly $6.5 million. In May alone, arrests were up almost 130%, stolen assets recovered were up 65%, and the value of the items recovered was up nearly…

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Israel-Iran: Urgent call to end ‘reckless military action’ and protect civilians amid growing hostilities

    Source: Amnesty International –

    Israeli and Iranian authorities repeatedly demonstrate utter disregard for international human rights and humanitarian law with impunity

    Escalation masks Israel’s deepening starvation of Gaza and West Bank oppression in ongoing apartheid

    Iran responds to Israeli attacks by imposing internet restrictions, arresting journalists, and executing a man for alleged espionage

    ‘Instead of cheering on one party to the conflict over another as if civilian suffering is a mere sideshow, governments must ensure the protection of civilians’ – Agnès Callamard

    As civilians continue to suffer the devastating impact of the escalating hostilities between Iran and Israel since 13 June, and with threats of further violence looming, Amnesty International is calling on both governments to uphold their obligations under international humanitarian law and ensure the protection of civilians.

    Agnès Callamard, Secretary General of Amnesty International, said:

    “As the number of deaths and injuries continue to rise, both parties must comply with their obligations and ensure that civilians in both countries do not further pay the price of reckless military action.

    “Further escalation of these hostilities’ risks unleashing devastating and far-reaching consequences for civilians across the region and beyond.

    “Statements by the US and the G7 so far have failed to recognise the catastrophic impact this escalation will have on civilians in both countries.

    “Instead of cheering on one party to the conflict over another as if civilian suffering is a mere sideshow, governments must ensure the protection of civilians. Preventing further suffering must be the priority – not the pursuit of military or geopolitical goals.

    “Both Israeli and Iranian authorities have time and again demonstrated their utter disregard for international human rights and humanitarian law, committing grave international crimes with impunity.

    “The world must not allow Israel to use this military escalation to divert attention away from its ongoing genocide against Palestinians in the occupied Gaza Strip, its illegal occupation of the whole Occupied Palestinian Territory and its system of apartheid against Palestinians.

    “Likewise, the international community must not ignore the suffering that decades of crimes under international law by the Iranian authorities have inflicted upon people inside Iran, that is now being compounded by relentless bombardment.”

    International law prohibits attacks on civilians

    Under international humanitarian law, all parties must take all feasible precautions to spare civilians and minimise their suffering and casualties.

    International humanitarian law strictly prohibits attacks directed at civilians and civilian objects, as well as attacks which do not distinguish between military targets and civilians or civilian infrastructure.

    Weapons that are extremely inaccurate and have large warheads that produce large area effects, such as ballistic missiles, should never be used in areas with large populations of civilians. Attacks on military objectives that are likely to result in disproportionate civilian casualties or destruction of civilian objects are also prohibited.

    In the shadow of this latest escalation, Israeli authorities continue to forcibly displace and starve Palestinians in the occupied Gaza Strip as part of their ongoing genocide. They have imposed a full closure on the West Bank, where state-backed settler violence continues to rise, further entrenching Israel’s illegal occupation and apartheid system.

    Meanwhile, Iranian authorities have responded to Israel’s latest military attacks by imposing internet restrictions, arresting journalists and dissidents within the country. They have also restricted prisoners’ communication with the outside world, including those in prisons near sites of the bombings. On 16 June, the Iranian authorities executed a man for alleged espionage for Israel, raising concerns about the fate of others on death row for similar charges. The Iranian authorities must release all human rights defenders and others arbitrarily detained.

    Sinister and fear-inducing ‘warnings’

    Over the past three days, Israeli officials, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Minister of Defence Israel Katz, and Persian-language spokesperson of the Israeli army Kamal Pinchasi have issued alarming threats and overly broad, ineffective evacuation warnings to millions of civilians in Tehran a major city with a population of around 10 million people, located in Tehran province which is home to around 19 million people. In some cases, warnings were issued in the middle of the night when residents were asleep or did not clarify if they referred to the city or the province of Tehran.

    On 16 June, Israel Katz, Israel’s Minister of Defense threatened on X that “the residents of Tehran will be forced to pay the price” for the actions of the Iranian authorities. Hours later, the Israeli military’s Persian-language spokesperson warned civilians to evacuate Tehran’s District Three – an area of approximately 30 square km and home to over 350,000 people via a video showing unclear danger zones. The video included a map indicating danger zones for civilians but did not clearly specify targeted locations or areas of blast and fragmentation hazard, leaving residents uncertain about which areas to avoid. Iranian civil society activists later republished the map with cleared boundaries and locations named.

    Prior to the “evacuation” warnings on 16 June, the Israeli army had issued another overly broad warning in Persian, instructing people across the country to  “immediately leave areas … [housing] military weapons manufacturing facilities and their support institutions”. The statement sowed panic and confusion among people, as the locations of military facilities are not known to the general public, and no clear guidance was provided on where civilians should or should not go to ensure their safety.

    Evacuation warnings do not release Israel from its other obligations under international humanitarian law. They must not treat as open-fire zones areas for which they have issued warnings. Millions of people in Tehran cannot leave, either because they have no alternative residences outside the city or due to limited mobility, disability, blocked roads, fuel shortages or other constraints. Israel has an obligation to take all feasible precautions to minimise harm to these civilians.

    Early morning Tehran time on 17 June, US President Donald Trump caused further panic with a Truth Social post stating: “Everyone should immediately evacuate Tehran.” US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and the White House amplified the message on X, amid media reports that the United States may join Israel in striking Iran. 

    In reaction to the Israeli warnings, Iranian state media reported on 15 June that the Iranian armed forces had issued warnings urging residents of Tel Aviv to evacuate. In a video aired on state media, Reza Sayed, spokesperson of the Communication Center of the General Staff of the Armed Forces stated: “Leave the occupied territories [referring to Israel and the OPT], as they will undoubtedly become uninhabitable for you in the future. Parties to armed conflicts are prohibited from issuing threats of violence which are designed to spread terror among the civilian population. They cannot hide behind overly general warnings to claim that they have met their obligations under international law.

    In Israel, these Iranian warnings have not triggered the same level of chaos and mass evacuation, largely due to the presence of the Iron Dome defense system and available shelters.  However, there have been cases where civilians, particularly Palestinian citizens of Israel and Bedouin communities, who do not have access to underground shelters, such as the Khatib family in the Palestinian town of Tamra, were killed as a result of an Iranian missile strike. Israeli civil society groups are calling on the government to urgently address the chronic lack of protected space for non-Jewish Israeli citizens. 

    Internet shutdowns and media censorship

    In Iran, the authorities have disrupted access to the Internet and instant messaging applications, preventing millions of people caught up in the conflict from accessing essential information and communicating with loved ones both inside and outside the country and thereby exacerbating their suffering.

    The Israeli authorities are also using vague security pretexts to target people over social media posts or sharing videos deemed to breach strict censorship rules.

    Agnès Callamard added:

    “Access to the Internet is essential to protect human rights, especially in times of armed conflict where communications blackouts would prevent people from finding safe routes, accessing life-saving resources, and staying informed. The Iranian authorities must immediately ensure full restoration of internet and communication services in all of Iran. 

    “Israeli authorities must refrain from using military escalations, as they have done in the past, as a further pretext to crack down on freedom of expression, disproportionately targeting Palestinian citizens of Israel, including through arbitrary detention over unsubstantiated allegations of incitement.”

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Urgent need to protect civilians amid unprecedented escalation in hostilities between Israel and Iran

    Source: Amnesty International –


    As more and more civilians bear the cruel toll of the terrifying military escalation in Iran and Israel since 13 June 2025, and amid threats of further escalation in the conflict, Amnesty International is urging the Israeli and Iranian authorities to abide by their obligations under international humanitarian law to protect civilians.

    On 16 June, an Iranian government spokesperson reported that Israeli attacks had killed at least 224 people, including 74 women and children, without specifying how many of them were civilians. The health ministry also stated 1,800 people have been injured.

    In Israel, the Israeli Military Home Front reported that Iranian attacks had killed at least 24 people, including women and children, stating that they were all civilians, with nearly 600 injured.

    “As the number of deaths and injuries continue to rise, Amnesty International is urging both parties to comply with their obligations and ensure that civilians in both countries do not further pay the price of reckless military action,” said Agnès Callamard, Secretary General of Amnesty International. 

    “Further escalation of these hostilities risks unleashing devastating and far-reaching consequences for civilians across the region and beyond.

    As the number of deaths and injuries continue to rise, Amnesty International is urging both parties to comply with their obligations and ensure that civilians in both countries do not further pay the price of reckless military action

    Agnès Callamard, Secretary General of Amnesty International

    “Statements by the US and the G7 so far have failed to recognize the catastrophic impact this escalation will have on civilians in both countries.

    “Instead of cheering on one party to the conflict over another as if civilian suffering is a mere sideshow, states must ensure the protection of civilians. Preventing further suffering must be the priority – not the pursuit of military or geopolitical goals.

    “Both Israeli and Iranian authorities have time and again demonstrated their utter disregard for international human rights and humanitarian law, committing grave international crimes with impunity.

    “The world must not allow Israel to use this military escalation to divert attention away from its ongoing genocide against Palestinians in the occupied Gaza Strip, its illegal occupation of the whole Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT) and its system of apartheid against Palestinians.

    “Likewise, the international community must not ignore the suffering that decades of crimes under international law by the Iranian authorities have inflicted upon people inside Iran, that is now being compounded by relentless bombardment.”

    Under international humanitarian law, all parties must take all feasible precautions to spare civilians and minimize their suffering and casualties. International humanitarian law strictly prohibits attacks directed at civilians and civilian objects, as well as attacks which do not distinguish between military targets and civilians or civilian infrastructure.

    For this reason, weapons that are extremely inaccurate and have large warheads that produce large area effects, such as ballistic missiles, should never be used in areas with large populations of civilians. Attacks on military objectives that are likely to result in disproportionate civilian casualties or destruction of civilian objects are also prohibited.

    In the deadliest incident in Israel, eight people including three children, were killed in Bat Yam, south of Tel Aviv, on 15 June.

    In Iran, at least 12 people including children and a pregnant woman were killed in one attack in Tajrish square in Tehran on 15 June.

    In the shadow of this latest escalation, Israeli authorities continue to forcibly displace and starve Palestinians in the occupied Gaza Strip as part of their ongoing genocide. They have imposed a full closure on the West Bank, where state-backed settler violence continues to rise, further entrenching Israel’s illegal occupation and apartheid system.

    Meanwhile, Iranian authorities have responded to Israel’s latest military attacks by imposing internet restrictions, arresting journalists and dissidents within the country. They have also restricted prisoners’ communication with the outside world, including those in prisons near sites of the bombings. On 16 June, the Iranian authorities executed a man for alleged espionage for Israel, raising concerns about the fate of others on death row for similar charges. The Iranian authorities must release all human rights defenders and others arbitrarily detained and should relocate other prisoners away from locations at risk of being attacked by Israel.

    Sinister and fear-inducing ‘warnings’

    Over the past three days, Israeli officials, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Minister of Defence Israel Katz, and Persian-language spokesperson of the Israeli army Kamal Pinchasi have issued alarming threats and overly broad, ineffective evacuation warnings to millions of civilians in Tehran a major city with a population of around 10 million people, located in Tehran province which is home to around 19 million people. In some cases, warnings were issued in the middle of the night when residents were asleep or did not clarify if they referred to the city or the province of Tehran.

    On 16 June, Israel Katz, Israel’s Minister of Defense threatened  on X that “the residents of Tehran will be forced to pay the price” for the actions of the Iranian authorities. Hours later, the Israeli military’s Persian-language spokesperson warned civilians to evacuate Tehran’s District Three – an area of approximately 30 square km and home to over 350,000 people- via a video showing unclear danger zones. The video included a map indicating danger zones for civilians but did not clearly specify targeted locations or areas of blast and fragmentation hazard, leaving residents uncertain about which areas to avoid. Iranian civil society activists later republished the map with cleared boundaries and locations named.

    Prior to the “evacuation” warnings on 16 June, the Israeli army had issued another overly broad warning in Persian, instructing people across the country to  “immediately leave areas … [housing] military weapons manufacturing facilities and their support institutions”. The statement sowed panic and confusion among people, as the locations of military facilities are not known to the general public, and no clear guidance was provided on where civilians should or should not go to ensure their safety.

    Evacuation warnings, even if detailed and effective, do not release Israel from its other obligations under international humanitarian law. They must not treat as open-fire zones areas for which they have issued warnings. Millions of people in Tehran cannot leave, either because they have no alternative residences outside the city or due to limited mobility, disability, blocked roads, fuel shortages or other constraints. Israel has an obligation to take all feasible precautions to minimize harm to these civilians.

    Early morning Tehran time on 17 June, US President Donald Trump caused further panic with a Truth Social post stating: “Everyone should immediately evacuate Tehran.” US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and the White House amplified the message on X, amid media reports that the United States may join Israel in striking Iran. 

    In reaction to the Israeli warnings, Iranian state media reported on 15 June that the Iranian armed forces had issued warnings urging residents of Tel Aviv to evacuate. In a video aired on state media, Reza Sayed, spokesperson of the Communication Center of the General Staff of the Armed Forces stated: “Leave the occupied territories [referring to Israel and the OPT], as they will undoubtedly become uninhabitable for you in the future … Do not allow the criminal regime to use you as human shields. Avoid residing or moving near the aforementioned locations and know that even underground shelters will not provide you with safety.”

    In Israel, these Iranian warnings have not triggered the same level of chaos and mass evacuation, largely due to the presence of the Iron Dome defense system and available shelters.  However, there have been cases where civilians, particularly Palestinian citizens of Israel and Bedouin communities, who do not have access to underground shelters, such as the Khatib family in the Palestinian town of Tamra, were killed as a result of an Iranian missile strike. Israeli civil society groups are calling on the government to urgently address the chronic lack of protected space for non-Jewish Israeli citizens

    Parties to armed conflicts are prohibited from issuing threats of violence which are designed to spread terror among the civilian population. They cannot hide behind overly general warnings to claim that they have met their obligations under international law. To constitute effective warnings under international humanitarian law, parties must provide civilians with clear and practical instructions on moving away from military objectives that will be targeted rather than unlawfully calling for the mass exodus of millions – an approach that appears designed more to incite panic and terror among civilians than to ensure their protection.

    Internet shutdowns and media censorship

    In Iran, the authorities have disrupted access to the Internet and instant messaging applications, preventing millions of people caught up in the conflict from accessing essential information and communicating with loved ones both inside and outside the country and thereby exacerbating their suffering.

    “Access to the Internet is essential to protect human rights, especially in times of armed conflict where communications blackouts would prevent people from finding safe routes, accessing life-saving resources, and staying informed. The Iranian authorities must immediately ensure full restoration of internet and communication services in all of Iran,” said Agnès Callamard.

    The Israeli authorities are also using vague security pretexts to target people over social media posts or sharing videos deemed to breach strict censorship rules.

    “Israeli authorities must refrain from using military escalations, as they have done in the past, as a further pretext to crack down on freedom of expression, disproportionately targeting Palestinian citizens of Israel, including through arbitrary detention over unsubstantiated allegations of incitement,” said Agnès Callamard.

    Background

    On 13 June 2025, Israeli authorities launched air and drone strikes against Iranian territory. Shortly afterwards, Israeli officials announced that they launched the operation to target Iranian nuclear and ballistic missile capabilities and decapitate Iran’s military leadership. The Israeli strikes began as Iran and the US were in the process of negotiating a new deal to limit Iran’s nuclear program and enrichment activities in exchange for sanctions relief.

    Iranian authorities have retaliated by launching hundreds of missiles and drones against Israeli territory.

    Israeli attacks have struck cities in multiple provinces across Iran, including the provinces of Alborz, East Azerbaijan, Esfahan, Fars, Kermanshah, Hamedan, Lorestan, Ilam, Markazi, Qom, Tehran, West Azerbaijan and Khorasan Razavi.

    Iranian attacks have struck several urban areas in Israel, such as Tel Aviv, Bat Yam, Tamra, Petah Tikva, Bnei Brak, Haifa, Herzliya.

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI USA: Rep. Pfluger Encourages TX-11 Students to Participate in the Second Lady’s Summer Reading Challenge

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman August Pfluger (TX-11)

    Rep. Pfluger Encourages TX-11 Students to Participate in the Second Lady’s Summer Reading Challenge

    Washington, June 18, 2025

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — Second Lady of the United States Usha Vance announced her Summer Reading Challenge, and Congressman August Pfluger (TX-11) is encouraging all K-8 students in Texas’s 11th Congressional District to participate. To enter, students must read 12 books, complete the reading log, and submit it to receive a prize. The challenge is open to all students in grades K-8, and participants will be entered into a raffle for a special trip to visit the Nation’s Capital!

    “The Second Lady’s Summer Reading Challenge is in full swing! Developing strong reading skills lays the foundation for lifelong success. I know my daughter is actively participating, and I encourage every eligible student to join in as well. This is an incredible opportunity to show the rest of America what I already know — that TX-11 is home to some of the best and brightest students in the country,” said Rep. Pfluger.

    The Summer Reading Challenge runs through September 5, 2025. To learn more and enter the challenge, please click HERE.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Trahan, Craig, Brown, Hayes, McGovern Lead 30 House Members Demanding Answers on Trump Administration’s Handling of Americans’ SNAP Data

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congresswoman Lori Trahan (D-MA-03)

    LOWELL, MA – Today, Congresswoman Lori Trahan (MA-03), House Agriculture Committee Ranking Member Angie Craig (MN-02), Congresswoman Shontel Brown (OH-11), Congresswoman Jahana Hayes (CT-05), and Congressman Jim McGovern (MA-02) led 30 House Democrats in demanding answers from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) on its handling of the personal data of Americans who applied for or received food assistance through the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP).
    “For months, this Administration has been on an unprecedented quest to collect and consolidate as much personal data from the American people as possible,” the lawmakers wrote. “Initiated by the so-called Department of Government Efficiency and bolstered by executive actions, including Executive Order 14243 on ‘Stopping Waste, Fraud, and Abuse by Eliminating Information Silos,’ the administration has combined the sensitive information of millions of individuals, creating major cybersecurity risks, endangering Americans’ privacy, and repeatedly violating the letter and spirit of longstanding laws, like the Privacy Act of 1974.”
    Last month, USDA notified states that they would be required to turn over sensitive data about millions of Americans as part of its Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) effort to collect and consolidate as much personal data as possible. The SNAP data requested by the administration includes Americans’ Social Security numbers, dates of birth, home addresses, employment and citizenship statuses, incomes, health information, history of substance abuse treatment, paternity, and history of child support payments. In its request, USDA wrote that the data would be used to “ensure program integrity” and is the “only way” to detect improper payments, despite the rollout of privacy-preserving initiatives like its National Accuracy Clearinghouse.
    In the lawmakers’ letter, they warn about the serious risks the Department’s demand poses for data breaches, hacking, and eroding trust in SNAP.
    “If Americans begin to lose trust in state SNAP agencies and EBT processors as good-faith stewards of their personal data, it will become increasingly difficult–and costly–to effectively administer SNAP. Americans may even forgo participation in SNAP entirely. These are unacceptable and, frankly, entirely avoidable outcomes,” the lawmakers concluded.
    A copy of the letter sent today can be accessed HERE.
    Additional co-signers include Representatives Alma S. Adams, Ph.D. (NC-12), Yassamin Ansari (AZ-03), Nanette Barragán (CA-44), Judy Chu (CA-28), Emanuel Cleaver, II (MO-05), Sharice Davids (KS-03), Danny K. Davis (IL-07), Diana DeGette (CO–01), Debbie Dingell (MI-06), Cleo Fields (LA-06), Jesús “Chuy” García (IL-04), Maggie Goodlander (NH-02), Josh Gottheimer (NJ-5), Sara Jacobs (CA-51), Pramila Jayapal (WA-07), Julie Johnson (TX-32), George Latimer (NY-16), Stephen F. Lynch (MA-08), Betty McCollum (MN-04), Eleanor Holmes Norton (DC-AL), Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (NY-14), Jimmy Panetta (CA-19), Chris Pappas (NH-01), Jan Schakowsky (IL-09), Lateefah Simon (CA-12), Shri Thanedar (MI-13), Bennie G. Thompson (MS-02), Rashida Tlaib (MI-12), Jill Tokuda (HI-02), and Nydia M. Velázquez (NY-07).
    This request follows efforts Trahan has led regarding DOGE’s alleged mishandling of Americans’ sensitive data housed in the Treasury Department’s payment system and separately at the National Labor Relations Board. In March, Trahan announced that she will be introducing legislation to rewrite the Privacy Act for the first time since its passage in 1974.
    ###

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Global: World Refugee Day: Prolonged refugee separation is harming families — and Canada’s economy

    Source: The Conversation – Canada – By Christina Clark-Kazak, Professor, Public and International Affairs, L’Université d’Ottawa/University of Ottawa

    As World Refugee Day approaches on June 20, advocates and health experts are calling on the Canadian government to urgently address prolonged family separation for refugees. With wait times for family reunification now averaging more than four years, critics say the delays are causing irreparable harm to refugee families and imposing long-term costs on the health-care system and the Canadian economy.

    The significant health, social and economic costs of prolonged family separation merit urgent action. These costs are borne by refugees and their families as well as municipal, provincial and federal governments.

    People seeking refugee protection whose claims are accepted in Canada receive protected person status and are allowed to apply for permanent residence. They are permitted to include dependent children and spouses who are outside Canada on their permanent residence applications.

    While accepted refugees and their family members are legally eligible for permanent residence in Canada, they must be admitted under the immigration levels for Protected Persons in Canada and Dependants Abroad. Because the number of people applying under these levels exceeds the number of spaces available, family separation currently lasts 50 months.

    In 2024, the government of Canada announced major reductions in immigration levels starting in 2025. These reductions will further delay family reunification, prolonging refugees’ bureaucratic limbo.

    Mental and physical health costs

    Studies document the several mental health consequences of the separation of children from their parent(s), and of spouses from their partner. These challenges intensify as the duration of the separation increases.

    Medical associations around the world say family separation is a traumatic event that can cause developmental regression and higher rates of unexplained illness in children.

    This trauma may stem from the sense of abandonment that children experience while being separated from their parents. In one study from 2005, an interviewee said:

    “It was hard at first … .The children thought that I had abandoned them. They considered me a traitor.”

    Despite the time and efforts invested in long-distance relationships, family breakdown may result from prolonged family separation, necessitating counselling or child protection services.

    These mental health consequences not only have human costs. They also represent a financial burden for the Canadian government through the Interim Federal Health Care (IFHC) Program. After protected people transition away from IFHC, provincial and territorial governments pay for health costs associated with family separation.

    Some children may also require school-based interventions, mental health services and counselling, the costs of which are also borne by provincial governments.

    Economic costs

    Protected people separated from their families also pay to maintain two households: one in Canada and one overseas. In a 2019 study, a refugee said that “sending remittances was more expensive than if they lived together in Canada.”

    Remittances not only represent a financial challenge to refugee families, they also result in indirect economic losses to Canada as funds leave the country instead of being invested in Canada.

    Research shows that family separation also inhibits integration. The inability to find affordable child care in a single-parent household, for example, limits the ability to learn official languages, participate in community groups and find work opportunities.

    For example, one woman from Afghanistan who had been waiting more than six years for reunification with her husband told researchers:

    “In night I sometimes cannot sleep and I just walk and walk around the lobby of my apartment building. […] I can no longer take care of my children when they’re missing all the time their father. They need their father. Even sometimes my family asking ‘where is he?’ and other kids at my children’s schools are asking.”

    This stress caused severe mental and physical health issues for this woman and her family, further limiting her ability to work.

    These integration challenges mean fewer people can work to their full capacity, limiting participation in the Canadian economy. Delayed economic integration due to family separation results in lower tax revenues for all levels of the Canadian government.

    Family unity provides refugees with the necessary support to manage the stresses of resettlement. Family reunification increases flexibility to adjust to a new country and culture without additional challenges.

    As refugees and their families integrate, Canada benefits. They find work, pay taxes and contribute to their communities.

    An easy administrative fix

    The United Nations declared June 20 to be World Refugee Day almost 25 years ago. Although it’s just one day, it reminds us to honour refugees from around the world.

    It is a good time for the Canadian government to work towards issuing temporary visas to eligible family members, allowing them to live in Canada while they await permanent residence.

    The right to family unity is protected by international law. Canada’s reputation as a leader in refugee protection is at risk if family reunification continues to be delayed.

    The social, health and economic costs of family separation are both inhumane and unnecessary.

    Chloé Bissonnette, undergraduate student in Conflict Studies and Human Rights at the University of Ottawa, contributed to this article.

    Christina Clark-Kazak receives funding from the Social Sciences Humanities and Research Council (SSHRC).

    ref. World Refugee Day: Prolonged refugee separation is harming families — and Canada’s economy – https://theconversation.com/world-refugee-day-prolonged-refugee-separation-is-harming-families-and-canadas-economy-258441

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Highlights – Joint EMPL-HOUS public hearing on the housing crisis – Committee on Employment and Social Affairs

    Source: European Parliament

    On 25 June 2025, from 11:00 to 12:30, the European Parliament Special Committee on the Housing Crisis in the EU and the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs (EMPL) are jointly organising a public hearing on Housing Rights, Property Rights and Tenant Protections: Addressing Evictions and Homeless.

    The exchange will focus on evaluating tenant rights, eviction policies, social housing availability, and homelessness reduction strategies, including EU best practices and policy recommendations.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Hearings – Joint EMPL-HOUS public hearing on the housing crisis – 25-06-2025 – Committee on Employment and Social Affairs

    Source: European Parliament

    On 25 June 2025, from 11:00 to 12:30, the European Parliament Special Committee on the Housing Crisis in the EU and the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs (EMPL) are jointly organising a public hearing on Housing Rights, Property Rights and Tenant Protections: Addressing Evictions and Homeless.

    The exchange will focus on evaluating tenant rights, eviction policies, social housing availability, and homelessness reduction strategies, including EU best practices and policy recommendations.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Press release – CBAM: Deal with Council to simplify EU carbon leakage instrument

    Source: European Parliament

    The changes to the EU carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM) are part of simplification efforts to reduce the administrative burden for SMEs and occasional importers.

    Parliament and Council today agreed on changes to the CBAM. These changes are part of the “Omnibus I” simplification package presented on 26 February 2025, which aims to simplify existing legislation in the fields of sustainability and investment.

    Co-legislators supported a new de minimis mass threshold whereby imports up to 50 tonnes per importer per year will not be subject to CBAM rules. It replaces the current threshold exempting goods of negligible value. The new threshold exempts the vast majority (90%) of importers − mainly small and medium-sized enterprises and individuals − who import only small quantities of CBAM goods. The climate ambition behind the mechanism remains unchanged, as 99% of total CO2 emissions from imports of iron, steel, aluminium, cement and fertilisers will still be covered by the CBAM. The co-legislators included safeguards to ensure this figure and to prevent circumvention of the rules.

    Co-legislators also agreed on changes to simplify imports covered by the CBAM such as the authorisation process, the calculation of emissions and verification rules as well as the financial liability of authorised CBAM declarants, while strengthening anti-abuse provisions.

    Quote

    After the deal, rapporteur Antonio Decaro (S&D, IT) said: “The CBAM is designed to prevent carbon leakage and protect Europe’s cement, iron, steel, aluminium, fertiliser, electricity, and hydrogen industries. We have answered calls from companies to simplify and streamline the process and exempted 90% of importers of CBAM goods to facilitate competitiveness and growth for our businesses. As the CBAM will still cover 99% of total CO2 emissions, we have maintained the EU’s environmental ambitions and remain fully committed to a just transition and to achieve climate neutrality by 2050.”

    Next steps

    Today’s deal has still to be endorsed by both Parliament and Council. It will enter into force three days after publication in the EU Official Journal.

    Background

    The EU’s carbon border adjustment mechanism is the EU’s tool to equalise the price of carbon paid for EU products operating under the EU emissions trading system (ETS) with that of imported goods, and to encourage greater climate ambition in non-EU countries. In early 2026, the Commission will assess whether to extend the scope of the CBAM to other ETS sectors and how to help exporters of CBAM products at risk of carbon leakage.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI United Nations: Experts of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women Commend Mexico’s Equality Achievements in Political and Public Life, Raise Questions on the Judiciary’s Response to Gender Crimes and Gender-Based Violence in Schools

    Source: United Nations – Geneva

    The Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women today concluded its consideration of the tenth periodic report of Mexico, with Committee Experts commending Mexico’s achievements in guaranteeing equality in political and public life, while raising questions on how the judiciary responded to gender crimes and how the State was tackling gender-based violence in schools.

    A Committee Expert said the Committee commended the State party’s achievements in guaranteeing equality in political and public life.  Reforms had been implemented towards preventing and eliminating gender discrimination.  This had resulted in a 43 per cent improvement in women’s public leadership positions.  The Committee lauded the 2019 constitutional reform, entitled “gender parity in everything”, which guaranteed political rights of women towards certifying gender parity for all candidates for elected political office, including municipalities with indigenous and Afro-Mexican populations. 

    An Expert asked what mechanisms the State had put in place to guarantee an effective, gender-sensitive judicial response?  Were there reparations available for victims of gender crimes?  What measures were being planned to ensure elected judges had knowledge to judge with a gender perspective?  Could statistics be provided on the fast-track and pretrial procedure, to illustrate how female victims had benefitted from these changes? Had the performances of judges who had been trained been assessed? 

     

    A Committee Expert said the Committee noted with concern the high school dropout rates due to pregnancy and violence.  The ongoing persistence and increase of violence against women and adolescents, at all educational levels, was also concerning, particularly high levels of sexual violence.  What measures had the State taken to guarantee education for pregnant teenagers and to prevent them from leaving school?  How was it ensured that comprehensive sexual education was provided at all levels and in all states?  Was there a plan to ensure the eradication of gender-based violence in schools?  What measures was the State taking to guarantee standardisation and the enforcement of penalties?

     

    The delegation said Mexico had special prosecution services in different bodies.  These ensured that the highest standards were used when investigating cases of femicide.  In cases of femicide, it was important to comply with standards relating to the crime.  Protocols had been standardised for the crimes of femicide.  The Tribunal of Judicial Discipline had been created to combat impunity.  The Women’s Secretariat was working with the Department of Prosecutions to create a network of female lawyers to provide advice and organise strategic lawsuits.

    The delegation said in 2024, Mexico significantly invested in the training of teachers, as part of the national strategy to deal with and prevent teenage pregnancy.  This also focused on keeping teenagers who were pregnant in school.  A programme called violence free schools supported people working in schools.  A protocol had been ratified to ensure the referral, channelling, follow-up and prevention of sexual violence in schools.  School dropout rates had fallen by 75 per cent for basic education, 26 per cent for secondary education, and 18 per cent in further education.  A national strategy was in place to prevent early pregnancy and there had been a 10 per cent drop in early pregnancy in Mexico over the past three years.   

    Introducing the report, Citlalli Hernández Mora, Secretary, Women’s Secretariat of Mexico and head of the delegation, said for decades, there had been a system of structural inequality which had intensified violence against women in Mexico. Legislative reforms by the President, which came into force in November 2024, established reinforced duties of the State to combat all types of violence against women, as well as the eradication of the gender wage gap.  The reforms also created the Women’s Secretariat, tasked with preventing violence against women, promoting a society of care, and reducing structural gaps. From 2019 to 2024, the gender pay gap was reduced by 29 per cent at the local level.

    In closing remarks, Ms. Hernández Mora commended the Committee for its work and the experts for their questions and comments.  The Committee’s recommendations were very important for the Government, and the dialogue had been an enriching experience.  Mexico was committed to changing the lives of all women in the country.

    In her closing remarks, Nahla Haidar, Committee Chair, thanked Mexico for the constructive dialogue which had provided further insight into the situation of women and girls in the country. 

    The delegation of Mexico was comprised of representatives of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs; the Ministry of Public Education; the Ministry of Health; the Secretariat of Women; the Mexican Social Security Institute; the Legislative Branch; the Judiciary; the National Institute of Statistics and Geography; the Electoral Tribunal of the Judicial Branch of the Federation; the National Electoral Institute; the National Council of Indigenous Peoples; and the Permanent Mission of Mexico to the United Nations Office at Geneva.

    The Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women’s ninety-first session is being held from 16 June to 4 July.  All documents relating to the Committee’s work, including reports submitted by States parties, can be found on the session’s webpage.  Meeting summary releases can be found here.  The webcast of the Committee’s public meetings can be accessed via the UN Web TV webpage.

    The Committee will next meet at 10 a.m. on Thursday, 19 June, to begin its consideration of the eighth periodic report of Thailand (CEDAW/C/THA/8).

    Report

    The Committee has before it the tenth periodic report of Mexico (CEDAW/C/MEX/10).

    Presentation of Report

    FRANCISCA E. MÉNDEZ ESCOBAR, Ambassador and Permanent Representative of Mexico to the United Nations Office at Geneva, said Mexico had hosted the First World Conference on Women in 1975 and was an active promoter of the Convention. Mexico was also involved in the creation of numerous mechanisms and groups, including United Nations Women. The State was committed to respecting, protecting, and promoting the human rights of women and girls in all their diversity.

    CITLALLI HERNÁNDEZ MORA, Secretary, Women’s Secretariat of Mexico and head of the delegation, said under the leadership of the first woman President of Mexico and as the State’s first Secretary for Women, she was pleased to lead the delegation. 

    For decades, there had been a system of structural inequality which had intensified violence against women in Mexico.  Legislative reforms by the President, which came into force in November 2024, established reinforced duties of the State to combat all types of violence against women, as well as the eradication of the gender wage gap.  The reforms also created the Women’s Secretariat, tasked with preventing violence against women, promoting a society of care, and reducing structural gaps. 

    In 2024, Mexico had 132.27 million inhabitants, of which 51.08 per cent were women; 9 per cent were indigenous women; 2 per cent were women with disabilities; and 1 per cent were Afro-Mexican women, requiring the State to build inclusive and intercultural policies.  The poorest person in Mexico was an indigenous girl with disabilities, which was why 45 billion dollars had been invested, allowing 3.5 million women to escape moderate poverty over the past six years. 

    From 2019 to 2024, the gender pay gap was reduced by 29 per cent at the local level.  The implementation of the New Mexican School System with a gender perspective had promoted actions to guarantee inclusive, egalitarian and quality education for children and young people in Mexico.  The first 12 of the 200 Education and Child Centres were being built, prioritising highly vulnerable areas such as the maquiladoras on the northern border.  The Pension Fund was launched this year for women between 60 and 64 years of age and had reached over 900,000 women. 

    The Women’s Secretariat had installed 678 LIBRE centres throughout the national territory, with an investment of almost 40 million dollars per year, which sought to offer comprehensive care, legal and psycho-emotional support to those who experience violence.  In March of this year, the Tejedoras de la Patria initiative was launched, which encompassed a national network of women protagonists to guide, lead and support their communities. 

    INGRID GÓMEZ, Undersecretary for the Right to a Life Free of Violence, Women’s Secretariat of Mexico, said femicide violence was one of the greatest challenges faced by the Mexican State.  The implementation of targeted territorial strategies, the strengthening of protection mechanisms for women at risk, and the improvement of victim care systems had resulted in a sustained downward trend in the incidence of femicides. During the first two months of 2025, there had been a decrease of 29.23 per cent reported cases compared to the same period in 2024.  This was the result of a coordinated institutional response, which included early warning of risk, strengthening and expanding the Women’s Justice Centres, specialised shelters, mobile units, and other protection measures. 

    Following the recommendation of the Committee, Mexico had made progress in the legislative harmonisation of the criminal category of femicide, which had been achieved in 28 of the 32 states.  The National Programme against Trafficking in Persons had been the backbone, promoting prevention, protection, prosecution and comprehensive care for victims.  The Office of the Special Prosecutor for the Investigation of Crimes in the Matter of Trafficking in Persons was created, which was a significant step. 

    JENNIFER FELLER, Director General of Human Rights and Democracy of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Mexico, said the Protection Mechanism for Human Rights Defenders and Journalists was a key tool to guarantee the safety and integrity of women human rights defenders and journalists.  As of April 2025, it had a total of 2,341 people, including female journalists, human rights defenders and their family members. 

    The Mexican State was sensitive to cases of disappearance of persons, including women. In 2019, the National Search Commission was created and, for the first time, a National Registry of Missing and Unlocated Persons was developed.  With the Attorney General’s Office and the State Prosecutors’ Offices, visits had been made to expert service institutions, temporary protection centres, cemeteries and shelters, to carry out human identification processes and interventions to recover remains deposited in mass graves.  The Mexican State continued with the search actions to locate all these people and had undertaken dialogue with almost 200 collectives of relatives of disappeared persons, with multiple Government institutions. 

    TERESA RAMOS ARREOLA, Head of the National Centre for Gender Equity, Sexual and Reproductive Health of Mexico, said 100 commitments had been made for the President’s six-year term, including the Care Programme from the first 1,000 days of life, which guaranteed access to women’s health services, especially reproductive health, bodily autonomy, and the prevention of gender violence.  In Mexico, contraception was free and 24 of the country’s 32 states had decriminalised abortion.  A technical note had been issued which outlined the obligation of the health sector to have available personnel and the necessary technical capacities to provide safe abortion services.

     

    YANETH DEL ROSARIO CRUZ GÓMEZ, Representative of Mexico’s National Council of Indigenous Peoples, said the reform of the second article of the Constitution, published in September 2024, should be celebrated.  It constituted a historic advance in the recognition of indigenous peoples as rights holders, with legal recognition and their own assets. However, the implementation of these rights was a challenge.  It was urgent for indigenous rights to be effectively implemented. 

    Indigenous and Afro-Mexican women were developing the general law on the rights of indigenous and Afro-Mexican peoples.  The resources allocated to indigenous peoples and communities, through the Contribution Fund for Social Infrastructure for Indigenous and Afro-Mexican Peoples, were welcomed. 

    MARTHA LUCÍA MICHER CAMARENA, Federal Senator and President of the Commission for Gender Equality of the Senate of the Republic, said in Mexico, they had a parity legislative power; there were 14 female governors in 32 states.  In December 2024, amendments were approved to various secondary laws, including the general law for equality between women and men; the general law on women’s access to a life free of violence; the National Code of Criminal Procedure; and the general law of the national public security system, among others.  Between 2021 and 2024, key legislative reforms were also adopted, including amendments to the Federal Penal Code and 22 local penal codes that now criminalised acid attacks, as well as other types of violence, within the criminal category of family violence. 

    MÓNICA SOTO, Presiding Magistrate of the Electoral Tribunal of the Judicial Branch of the Federation, said the Electoral Tribunal of the Judicial Branch of the Federation had issued rulings to seek balanced representation in the Government. In 2024, the first parity federal Congress was constituted, after 108 years as an independent Republic. Despite this, there were significant challenges, with only 28 per cent of municipal presidencies headed by women. In many cases, violations of their rights persisted. 

    Gender-based political violence against women continued to be a reality.  However, in a historical precedent in 2021, the Superior Chamber of the Court annulled the election results in Iliatenco, Guerrero for gender-based political violence against an indigenous woman.  Authorities had been trained, and guides and protocols had been issued for judgment with a gender perspective in electoral matters and, in May 2024, the Specialised Ombudsman’s Office for the Care of Women was created. 

    MARYCARMEN COLOR VARGAS, Director of Gender Equality of the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation, said the Supreme Court of Justice had issued a protocol for judging with a gender perspective, which was updated in 2020.  To ensure its implementation, the Court and the Council of the Federal Judiciary had deployed a training strategy with case law notebooks, manuals, thematic notes, specialised works, and self-management courses. To date, 59 per cent of federal civil servants had completed mandatory training in gender and human rights.  The Comprehensive Inclusion Policy had been adopted, which increased the participation of women at the highest judicial levels from 20 per cent to 31 per cent. 

    CITLALLI HERNÁNDEZ MORA, Secretary, Women’s Secretariat of Mexico and head of the delegation, said Mexico reaffirmed at the highest level its commitment to this Committee, to peace, and to the fight against discrimination against women and girls in all their diversity.

    Questions by a Committee Expert

    YAMILA GONZÁLEZ FERRER, Committee Expert and Country Rapporteur, said Mexico was a great country which faced colossal challenges.  Mexico should be congratulated on electing its first female President in its history, and the Committee recognised the State’s decision to adopt a feminist foreign policy, as well as the 2024 constitutional reform that incorporated the right to substantive equality, a life free from violence, and decent care.  The Committee also welcomed the constitutionalisation of the National Care System, the ratification of International Labour Organization Convention 189 on domestic work, and the progressive decriminalisation of abortion in several states.

    However, there were several issues.  The National Council to prevent discrimination seemed to have been weakened and seemed to lack power to strengthen itself; what had been done to strengthen this institution?   What steps had been taken to put in place criminal legislation which provided legal certainty for women?  What measures had the State taken to strengthen the independence of the National Human Rights Commission?  What help had it provided to women searching for the disappeared?   

    What mechanisms did the State put in place to guarantee an effective, gender-sensitive judicial response?  Were there interpreters available in indigenous languages?  Were there reparations available for victims of gender crimes? What measures were being planned to ensure elected judges had knowledge to judge with a gender perspective? Could statistics be provided on the fast-track and pretrial procedure, to illustrate how female victims had benefitted from these changes?  Had the performances of judges who had been trained been assessed? 

    Responses by the Delegation

    The delegation said that since 2018, the country had been experiencing deep seated change, including in the public administration system.  Mexico was a federal republic with 32 different constitutional bodies. It was important to mention the inclusion of discrimination in article 1 of Mexico’s Constitution.  The law on equality between men and women included a new law on discrimination.  There was a worsening situation for women in Mexico.  In non-progressive States, the situation was worse for women.  This was due to religious ideas, which impacted women’s sexual and reproductive health rights. 

    Mexico had special prosecution services in different bodies.  These ensured that the highest standards were used when investigating cases of femicide.  In cases of femicide, it was important to comply with standards relating to the crime. Protocols had been standardised for the crimes of femicide.  The Tribunal of Judicial Discipline had been created to combat impunity.  Lack of access to justice often took the form of impunity.  The Women’s Secretariat was working with the Department of Prosecutions to create a network of female lawyers to provide advice and organise strategic lawsuits.

    The National Human Rights Commission was a public independent body, with independence guaranteed in Mexican laws.  It issued recommendations on human rights violations when there was a gender element, and had general recommendations on femicide.  The Constitutional reform outlined the rights of indigenous peoples to be assisted by an interpreter, which must be taken into account to ensure appropriate defence in court. 

    The reform of the judiciary began with a desire to see parity in access, including equal representation of men and women as judges and magistrates.  Currently, only 30 per cent of these positions were held by women.  A judicial school would focus specifically on training.  A guidebook was being created for gender-based judgements which would represent a crucial tool.  There was one training programme which was binding for all members of the judiciary, and it was helping the State achieve progress. 

    The previous corruption of the judiciary did not allow women or relatives of killed women to defend themselves.  Unofficial pretrial was used due to the corruption of the judiciary.  Many judges would free perpetrators of femicide who would then threaten the relatives of murdered women. 

    Questions by Committee Experts

    A Committee Expert congratulated Mexico on the election of the first female President, and recognised the steps taken to achieve gender equality, including the creation of the first Ministry for Women in 2024.  What concrete steps was Mexico taking to strengthen effective coordination between national institutions on policies relating to the rights of women and girls, in light of technical and financial challenges; what concrete steps were being provided to strengthen their international capacity?  How was it ensured that institutions received technical resources to support their work? 

    Another Expert said Parliament had a high level of women’s representation, and as heads of Government.  However, while women comprised 50 per cent of candidates for mayoral elections, they were not being elected at the same rate, and faced barriers, including political violence and stereotypes.  Why had Mexico not adopted temporary special measures in this regard?  What temporary special measures had the State adopted to ensure parity in decision-making positions?  What about for the heads of corporate and private companies? Would the State consider adopting a positive discrimination act?   

    Responses by the Delegation

    The delegation said since 2018, Mexico had promoted the participation of women in the peace and security sector.  Work had been carried out to mainstream gender issues in all budgets and Government actions.  This year, half the budget was allocated for men, and half for women.  The budget aimed to make up areas of weakness in inequality.  The National Programme for Equality between men and women had mechanisms for follow-up and for impact assistance.  A national system was in place for the prevention and eradication of violence. A national database included a recording or registration of incidents of violence of women and girls; this was a register which different bodies fed information into.  The State aimed to have a living database which gave a clear overview of cases. 

    Mexico already had a law on equality.  As part of the 2021 electoral process, the competitive block system had been used. As part of the block, three levels of competitiveness were established in different areas.  This aimed to ensure women were candidates in places where they had a real chance of winning, which aimed to improve women’s participation at the local political levels.  In Mexico, there was no quota in place, but legislation was amended to bring about equality between men and women in elections. 

    A network of defenders had been put in place throughout the country, and within the network, there was now a defenders training network.  These people were selected to train and pass on their knowledge and skills, including on electoral justice.  The recent 2024 election had resulted in 540 female local authority council leaders.  The burden of proof had been reversed to ensure defendants had to provide they were not violent to women in the local council. 

    During the pandemic in 2021, the health system put in place special measures for women and girls to deal with the additional burden on them to provide caring in the home. This meant there had to be coordination on mental health services.  There were now centres which provided services to workers in the mental health sector and users of the mental health system.  Issues such as anxiety, post-traumatic stress, and depression, and their treatments, were key focuses.  Mental health services had been provided during lockdowns.

    There had been political party shenanigans when quotas were in place.  Mexico had equality.  Any electoral list needed to be composed of 50 per cent women and 50 per cent men. Positive discrimination and quotas were previously essential, but the State did not need them now because political equality had been achieved and Mexico was working to maintain it.

    Questions by Committee Experts

    An Expert said the Committee was concerned about the different definitions of feminicide, which meant many murders of women were not classified as feminicide.  Currently just 20 per cent of female murders were classed as femicide.  The persistence of stereotypes in the media, which mainly impacted minority women, was concerning.  Nonconsensual surgeries which impacted women with disabilities and indigenous women were also concerning.  What training was provided to the judiciary?  Was its impact assessed?  The search protocol for women and girls who had been disappeared was not effectively implemented throughout the country, which was concerning. 

    The Committee was also worried at the lack of inclusion of an intersectional approach in investigation protocols.  The lack of access to information, including rulings on violence against women, was additionally concerning.  The Committee was worried about the lack of a broad reparations policy for victims, particularly victims of violence or those who had been disappeared.  Data was lacking in many areas, including for women and girls who had been disappeared. 

    What measures were put in place for companies running social media to ensure they sanctioned criminal postings on their websites?  Could information be provided about women who were deprived of liberty? 

    A Committee Expert said the improvement of legislation on trafficking, including the general law to prevent, punish and eradicate trafficking in persons, was a positive step, as well as the creation of the Inter-Secretarial Commission on Trafficking, and the work of the Commission for Victim Support.  Nevertheless, the lack of sufficient implementation and coordination persisted as well as inefficient investigations, and the complicity of authorities with organised crime related to trafficking.

    What specific measures had the State adopted to prevent, investigate and punish trafficking in women for the purpose of sexual exploitation, and with what results?  How was it ensured that trafficking policies did not criminalise or re-victimise victims?  What actions had been developed against trafficking networks affecting migrant women and girls?  What programmes existed to guarantee reparation and mental health care to victims?  How were victims, who had been forced to engage in illegal acts by the cartels, protected?  How would the State party maintain a gender focus in their security policy?  Weapons in the United States were the main reasons for killings in the country. What follow-up measures did the Government consider in regard to United States manufacturers of weapons? 

    Responses by the Delegation

    The delegation said 71 justice centres existed in the country.  A programme was in place to shed light on situations of violence which took place in different parts of the country, and bring down the levels of violence nation-wide.  In 2024, the Charter was created to protect citizens from trafficking in persons, published in multiple languages, as well as in indigenous languages, and disseminated throughout the Government and federal bodies.  A manual on trafficking and an agreement had been developed, allowing local staff to be used to assist victims of femicide.  There was now a legal obligation to disseminate all decisions; these were now publicly available.  All persons were required to undergo mandatory training from the judiciary. 

    Mexico was aware that gender needed to be mainstreamed.  Around 62 per cent of mothers seeking the disappeared were located in seven federal states of Mexico.  Among the Constitutional reforms carried out, the comprehensive act on the national system of public security had been amended to create a special chapter on protection measures.  The Women’s Secretariat was raising the visibility of these measures to prevent violence against women.  The Mexican State had committed to developing a register to track orphans who were victims of femicide.  The State had been working on the harmonisation of the search protocols for women and girls.  The coverage of the justice centres for women had been enlarged, and there were now almost 80 in operation. 

    The fast-track procedure for femicide should not be compared to impunity.  This process was an opportunity to have access to truth, if the accused was convicted.  It enabled important information to be secured to ensure no further information escaped the prosecution.  The programme to combat trafficking was being updated this year. 

    Mexico had 33 criminal codes nationwide, due to the country’s federal makeup.  In the national criminal procedure, there was one single definition; femicide was criminalised, with gender stipulated as a ground.  Work had been undertaken on media violence, and several secondary laws which suppressed online and media violence had been amended.  Anyone guilty of online violence was liable to be punished.  The definition of femicide had been reworked, as had the measures to provide compensation to victims.  Mexico had developed protection measures for victims of online and media violence, which was something no other country had done before. 

    Legal reforms and awareness campaigns had been put in place to eradicate forced marriage.  It was essential to put in place a law which stipulated that marriage should only take place at the age of 18.  It was vital to eradicate child marriage in indigenous communities.  There had been a drop in this phenomenon of four per cent since 2018. 

    The State recognised the difficult situation of women in a mobility situation and the risk of gender-based violence.  The right to apply for refugee status was recognised in Mexico and was supported by various agreements. 

    There was no militarisation of Mexico’s security system.  It was acknowledged that violations had been committed by Mexico’s armed forces, and the State was committed to ensuring these events did not reoccur.   Mexico would ensure that codes were in line, so all crimes were dealt with the same way across the whole country.  The State would review communications and assess how femicide was reported, which could often lead to revictimisation of the victim.  It was vital to combat impunity in order to combat violence. 

    Civil society organizations had been key in achieving progress in Mexico, including in the areas of digital violence.  The State aimed to work together with social media platforms to prevent digital violence from occurring.  Mexico was a victim of trafficking in weapons.  It was essential for the State to continue to wage war on this phenomenon. 

    When considering how to classify crimes of femicide, the rulings related to several factors, including the relationship between the victim and the perpetrator.  Criteria were now in place which mandated that any violent death of a woman was to be investigated as a femicide.  It was vital to ensure the prosecution services were strengthened.  There were now 40 prosecutors and around 100 people investigating cases of femicide. For 2024, there had been 2,564 first degree murders of women, as well as more than 800 femicides. 

    Questions by a Committee Expert

    A Committee Expert said the Committee commended the State party’s achievements of guaranteeing equality in political and public life.  Reforms had been implemented towards preventing and eliminating gender discrimination.  This had resulted in a 43 per cent improvement in women’s public leadership positions.  The Committee lauded the 2019 constitutional reform entitled “gender parity in everything”, which guaranteed the political rights of women towards certifying gender parity for all candidates for elected political office, including municipalities with indigenous and Afro-Mexican populations.  Law 303 against violence was also lauded, which prevented male aggressors or those sentenced for violence from holding public office. However, concerns remained. 

    Could the State party outline existing measures to prevent political violence against women? What special measures had been adopted to ensure the political participation of indigenous women and other minority groups?  What percentage of women heading embassies and multilateral organizations was held by traditionally marginalised women?  What plans existed to combat women’s low levels of political participation and strengthen their participation in the community and social participation beyond elections?   

    Responses by the Delegation

    The delegation said Mexico produced disaggregated data regarding the situation of women.  There were 78 programmes desegregating data by gender.  The national survey on domestic relationships provided information on violence against women at home.  It reflected a falling trend in domestic violence.  Concerning financial issues, according to data, more than 26 per cent of women now had increased access to financial products, including loans and credit. The State was using available data to design and monitor public policies which were evidence-based.

    Around 200,000 firearms unlawfully entered Mexico every year.  Mexico was awaiting the decision of the International Criminal Court of Justice on this.  Trafficking in arms was a scourge in the country, and it was important to combat this. Gender gaps needed to be reduced in leadership roles.  The most recent survey stated that women made up 37 per cent of the diplomatic core, only 25 per cent of whom were ministers.  There were training programmes in place for public officials regarding political violence against women.  Specialised meetings had been carried out to disseminate the rights of women, including those with disabilities, migrant women, and rural women. In connection with civil society, a network had been created with women human rights defenders, guaranteeing the participation of these groups in courts.  It was mandatory to ensure parity in municipal bodies. 

    Questions by a Committee Expert

    A Committee Expert welcomed the provision in the law which permitted the transmission of nationality to descendants, including children born abroad.  What measures had the State adopted to ensure universal birth registration?  Had rural offices for birth registration been established?  What measures had been adopted to overcome barriers that indigenous women faced when they sought to register their children?  How was access to identity documents ensured?  What measures had been taken to facilitate the return of Mexican citizens to Mexico and guarantee their access to identity papers? 

    Responses by the Delegation

    The delegation said coordination groups had been established with the state civil registry, and registration campaigns had been launched.  Mobile units addressed issues regarding the registration of migrant births. There was no restriction on the status of a migrant person, whether documented or undocumented, to process their application to have access to services.

    Questions by a Committee Expert

    A Committee Expert commended Mexico for progress made in the area of education, including the education act which recognised the right to secular, free, inclusive education, which was gender and human rights based.  The State party was encouraged to continue and consolidate these efforts. What measures were underway to guarantee access to education?  What was Mexico doing to ensure that gender equality was truly maintained in school curricula?  What percentage of the educational budget was set aside for gender-based programmes? How were their impacts assessed? 

    The Committee noted with concern the high school drop-out rates due to pregnancy and violence. The ongoing persistence and increase of violence against women and adolescents, at all educational levels, was also concerning, particularly high levels of sexual violence.  What measures had Mexico taken to guarantee education for pregnant teenagers and to prevent them from leaving school?  How was it ensured that comprehensive sexual education was provided at all levels and in all states?  Was there a plan to ensure the eradication of gender-based violence in schools?  What measures was the State taking to guarantee standardisation and the enforcement of penalties?

    Responses by the Delegation

    The delegation said the new school model was based on the gender perspective, and the new sexual education syllabus had been created under this model.  In 2024, Mexico significantly invested in the training of teachers, as part of the national strategy to deal with and prevent teenage pregnancy.  This also focused on keeping teenagers who were pregnant in school.  A programme called violence-free schools supported people working in schools.  A protocol had been ratified to ensure the referral, channelling, follow-up and prevention of sexual violence in schools. 

    School dropout rates had fallen by 75 per cent for basic education, 26 per cent for secondary education, and 18 per cent in further education.  Mexico had invested just over 500,000 dollars on school infrastructure.  A national strategy was in place to prevent early pregnancy and there had been a 10 per cent drop in early pregnancy in Mexico over the past three years. Particular focus was paid to rural and isolated areas, where the issue was connected to others such as forced marriage.  Schools feeding programmes offered food and support to Afro and indigenous students. There were also scholarships available for higher education. 

    Questions by a Committee Expert

    A Committee Expert said the Government had adopted gender responsive labour reforms which promoted women’s access to employment, which was commendable.  However, the majority of women were concentrated in the informal market, and only 25 per cent of managers were women in private and public sectors.  Women also faced sexual harassment and threats in the workplace. 

    What actions had Mexico taken to close the gender wage gap between women and men?  How could women be helped to improve their digital literacy to start their own businesses and ensure employment?  How was it ensured that women employed in the domestic, care and agricultural sectors enjoyed social security and paid care benefits? How could indigenous women, women with disabilities, and migrant women have access to paid employment and social security?  What complaints mechanisms were in place for women in the labour market? 

    Responses by the Delegation

    The delegation said a programme was in place for rural and agricultural workers and temporary workers, with more than 20,000 women enrolled.  A programme had been put in place for domestic workers, with 60,000 domestic workers enrolled.  Nearly 200,000 persons benefitted from childcare schemes.  Legislation had been drafted allowing for pregnant persons to ask to be placed back on their post when they returned to work.  Short-term contracts were available for pregnant persons, which had to be extended after maternity leave had been taken. 

    A pilot project was being developed in Mexico, and legislation had been promulgated on rights for domestic workers.  Mexico had made progress in the areas of health, education and welfare.  A new minimum wage policy had been instigated to ensure a decent wage to those who earned the least.  The gender pay gap had been reduced by 29 per cent at the local level between 2019 and 2024.  The minimum wage for workers in border areas with the United States had increased significantly.  Over the past six years, there had been an 18.7 per cent increase in the number of women covered by social security systems.  In 2022, an agreement was struck between the private and public sector which aimed to monitor and assess the gender pay gap. 

    Questions by a Committee Expert

    A Committee Expert said since the last meeting with Mexico, there had been significant progress in sexual and reproductive health, but challenges still remained.  How was care for women guaranteed in State hospitals? Why did vaccination coverage dramatically drop from 100 per cent to 28 per cent to 2021?  What was the reason for the increase in breast cancer cases in the country?  What was the State doing to target women’s health? 

    Mexico should be commended for progress made in legalising abortion; however, it had still not been decriminalised in nine jurisdictions.  Care services for women who had chosen to have an abortion due to rape were still linked to the judicial system.  Some young children were detained because they had had an abortion. How was the State party planning to resolve these challenges?  How did the State intend to address issues such as hostile health workers or access to modern contraception? 

    How would the State combat the forced sterilisation of indigenous women and those with disabilities? Had there been reparations for victims? What measures were being taken to ensure a gender perspective when assessing the disabilities of women?  How could women who were victims of gender-based violence have access to mental health services without stigmatisation? Were there special services for the rehabilitation of children whose mothers were victims of violence? 

    Responses by the Delegation 

    The State was revising the law to ensure that cases of rape were not linked to the judicial system. It did not need to be proven that sexual violence had taken place to have access to a safe abortion.  The federal system continued to work with the nine states where abortion had not been decriminalised.  All contraception products were free and provided by the health care system for anyone who required them.  Mexico was reviewing all informed consent in relation to the health system to ensure they were accessible to persons with disabilities, and to allow anyone to have full control over decisions being taken or any procedure recommended for them. 

    The new health system guaranteed all women had the same quality, standardised care throughout the country.  One of the emblematic programmes of the new administration covered treatment for the elderly and persons with disabilities.  Thousands of doctors and nurses had been recruited and went door to door seeking out these people and helping them to create a medical file to receive the care they needed.  More than 80 justice centres provided free psychological and counselling services. The State needed to recruit additional specialised healthcare workers to bolster mental health services. 

    Mexico was working closely with offices that defended the rights of children and adolescents to enable them to identify children and adolescents at risk in all areas. Guidelines had been issued in February this year, focusing on obstetric violence.  No woman in Mexico was in prison because she had carried out an abortion. An amnesty had been declared last year for anyone in prison for this reason.  The State had been working to ensure all these women were released. 

    Questions by a Committee Expert

    A Committee Expert commended the State party on its notable initiatives to advance the economic and social benefits of women, including the microcredits for wellbeing programme, with over 70.5 per cent of the 1.25 million loans allocated to women. Nonetheless, their impact was limited. Mexico had the lowest rate of women’s economic participation in the region and would not reach gender parity on corporate boards until 2052.  What plans were in place to integrate unpaid care and domestic work into macroeconomic frameworks?  Were women non-governmental organizations consulted to capture their views and voices in the design? 

    What measures were in place to increase female leadership in economic sectors, financial portfolios, and procurement opportunities?  How were women, particularly indigenous, Afro-Mexican, rural and migrant women, and women with disabilities benefiting from targeted economic interventions?  What concrete plans existed to expand women’s participation in sports leadership?  Were there gender targets within the investment plan and the sovereign wealth fund?  The State should be commended on the act which regulated the digital sector. Was there data available on the level of reparations provided by companies regarding violations of women’s rights? 

    Responses by the Delegation

    The delegation said Mexico aimed to boost domestic trade through a number of credit lines, and aimed to empower workers economically.  The President had created the very first cooperative with the cleaners in the Presidential Palace.  Significant progress had been recorded in the reduction of poverty. 

    There had been a 12 percent increase in the income of rural women.  There had been a financial transfer to women between the ages of 60 and 64.  Women athletes earned up to 500 per cent less than men for the same sport.  An initiative had been developed to ensure that women who were professional sports persons were entitled to a basic wage, which so far did not exist for female athletes.  Around 5,403 economic projects had been supported by the State to drive forward activities for productive education for communities and regions. This year, Mexico would be creating 200 childcare centres to ensure that women, particularly rural and indigenous women, did not have to leave their job to care for their children.

    All economic projects had a gender-based approach.  Everything began with consultations with the community.  Many new governmental funds were earmarked for the fostering of the participation of women in rural areas, including for land titles. 

    Questions by a Committee Expert

    A Committee Expert asked if the Mexico City law for the murder of trans people for reasons of identity would be extended to all 32 states?  Would the ratification of the new United Nations Cybercrime Convention of 2025 be considered?  While Mexico had seen an 18 per cent reduction in rural poverty, this issue persisted.  How would the plan developed address rural poverty?  Would rural women be able to overcome cultural taboos to land ownership? 

    Around 46.1 per cent of those in pretrial detention were women.  Women were sometimes kept in prison awaiting sentencing for many years. How would the State strengthen their due process rights in this regard?  How would the State bring a survivor-centred approach to justice for the disappeared and their families?  It was acknowledged that the President had committed her office to addressing enforced disappearance; however, it was important to bring a gender perspective to this. 

    Responses by the Delegation

    The delegation said more than 10 million people had come out of poverty over the past seven years, due to the social policies in place specifically targeting rural and indigenous areas.  Mexico had social protection caravans, ensuring protection and advice was taken to women in different areas.  Training was provided to rural women and they were given special tools and knowledge to exercise their land rights.  The State had reached the goal to issue 150,000 land titles. 

    Special gynaecological and trauma services had been provided for women in prisons.  There was special care for pregnant women in prison and children detained with their mothers.  A mechanism was in place to follow-up on cases of torture.  The Public Defender had carried out 5,600 visits to female detainees, and ensured that measures they had implemented had yielded results, including special care for trans women.  Lengthy pre-trial detention periods had to be overseen by a court.  Mexico had stated at the Conference of States parties that they did not agree with the implementation of a declaration which rid the Convention against Enforced Disappearances of its meaning.  This was a unilateral decision by the Committee.   

    Questions by a Committee Expert

    A Committee Expert asked what was being done to help women facing intersectional discrimination to claim their rights in court?  What would be done to harmonise indigenous rules with gender equality?  What had been the impact of efforts targeting law enforcement authorities?  What were the plans for the future to make family judges and lawyers, social workers and local authorities fully aware of women’s rights?  The Committee commended Mexico for positive trends in combatting child marriage.  What was being done to raise awareness about the minimum age of marriage and further improve respect for the prohibition of early marriage? 

    Responses by the Delegation

    The delegation said Mexico had made constitutional reforms and reforms to secondary law to protect all women in their diversity, including migrant women, domestic workers, and indigenous women. A lot of progress had been made in protecting the intersectional rights of women.  A court had noted that it was mainly women who had caring responsibilities, and the State was focusing on the situation on the division of labour. Measures had been taken to provide information in indigenous languages.

    Closing Remarks 

    CITLALLI HERNÁNDEZ MORA, Secretary, Women’s Secretariat of Mexico and head of the delegation, commended the Committee for its work and the Experts for their questions and comments.  All the different sectors of the State were involved in drafting the report.  Mexico had made progress but there were areas where challenges remained.  Mexico had a striving civil society and a strong feminist movement, as well as the first woman President.  The Committee’s recommendations were very important for the Government, and the dialogue had been an enriching experience.  Mexico was committed to changing the lives of all women in the country.

    NAHLA HAIDAR, Committee Chair, said she had been privileged to meet the President of Mexico and was hopeful about her vision.  It was an exceptional opportunity for the world to have a female in this position.  Ms. Haidar thanked Mexico for the constructive dialogue which had provided further insight into the situation of women and girls in the country. 

    ___________

    Produced by the United Nations Information Service in Geneva for use of the media; 
    not an official record. English and French versions of our releases are different as they are the product of two separate coverage teams that work independently.

     

     

    CEDAW25.0013E

    MIL OSI United Nations News