NewzIntel.com

Category: housing

  • MIL-OSI Global: FDA limits access to COVID-19 vaccine to older adults and other high-risk groups – a public health expert explains the new rules

    Source: The Conversation – USA – By Libby Richards, Professor of Nursing, Purdue University

    Older adults will continue to receive yearly COVID-19 shots, but lower-risk groups will not, says the FDA. dusanpetkovic via iStock / Getty Images Plus

    On May 20, 2025, the Food and Drug Administration announced a new stance on who should receive the COVID-19 vaccine.

    The agency said it would approve new versions of the vaccine only for adults 65 years of age and older as well as for people with one or more risk factors for severe COVID-19 outcomes. These risk factors include medical conditions such as asthma, cancer, chronic kidney disease, heart disease and diabetes.

    However, healthy younger adults and children who fall outside of these groups may not be eligible to receive the COVID-19 shot this fall. Vaccine manufacturers will have to conduct clinical trials to demonstrate that the vaccine benefits low-risk groups.

    FDA Commissioner Martin Makary and the agency’s head of vaccines, Vinay Prasad, described the new framework in an article published in the New England Journal of Medicine and in a public webcast.

    The Conversation U.S. asked Libby Richards, a nursing professor involved in public health promotion, to explain why the changes were made and what they mean for the general public.

    Why did the FDA diverge from past practice?

    Until the May 20 announcement, getting a yearly COVID-19 vaccine was recommended for everyone ages 6 months and older, regardless of their health risk.

    According to Makary and Prasad, the Food and Drug Administration is moving away from these universal recommendations and instead taking a risk-based approach based on its interpretation of public health trends – specifically, the declining COVID-19 booster uptake, a lack of strong evidence that repeated boosters improve health outcomes for healthy people and the fact that natural immunity from past COVID-19 infections is widespread.

    The FDA states it wants to ensure the vaccine is backed by solid clinical trial data, especially for low-risk groups.

    Was this a controversial decision or a clear consensus?

    The FDA’s decision to adopt a risk-based framework for the COVID-19 vaccine aligns with the expected recommendations from the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, an advisory group of vaccine experts offering expert guidance to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on vaccine policy, which is scheduled to meet in June 2025. But while this advisory committee was also expected to recommend allowing low-risk people to get annual COVID-19 vaccines if they want to, the FDA’s policy will likely make that difficult.

    Although the FDA states that its new policy aims to promote greater transparency and evidenced-based decision-making, the change is controversial – in part because it circumvents the usual process for evaluating vaccine recommendations. The FDA is enacting this policy change by limiting its approval of the vaccine to high-risk groups, and it is doing so without any new data supporting its decision. Usually, however, the FDA broadly approves a vaccine based on whether it is safe and effective, and decisions on who should be eligible to receive it are left to the CDC, which receives research-based guidance from the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices.

    Change is coming to COVID-19 vaccine policy.
    Rock Obst, CC BY-SA

    Additionally, FDA officials point to Canada, Australia and some European countries that limit vaccine recommendations to older adults and other high-risk people as a model for its revised framework. But vaccine strategies vary widely, and this more conservative approach has not necessarily proven superior. Also, those countries have universal health care systems and have a track record of more equitable access to COVID-19 care and better COVID-19 outcomes.

    Another question is how health officials’ positions on COVID-19 vaccines affect public perception. Makary and Prasad noted that COVID-19 vaccination campaigns may have actually eroded public trust in vaccination. But some vaccine experts have expressed concerns that limiting COVID-19 vaccine access might further fuel vaccine hesitancy because any barrier to vaccine access can reduce uptake and hinder efforts to achieve widespread immunity.

    What conditions count as risk factors?

    The New England Journal of Medicine article includes a lengthy list of conditions that increase the risk of severe COVID-19 and notes that about 100 million to 200 million people will fall into this category and will thus be eligible to get the vaccine.

    Pregnancy is included. Some items on the list, however, are unclear. For example, the list includes asthma, but the data that asthma is a risk factor for severe COVID-19 is scant.

    Also on the list is physical inactivity, which likely applies to a vast swath of Americans and is difficult to define. Studies have found links between regular physical activity and reduced risk of severe COVID-19 infection, but it’s unclear how health care providers will define and measure physical inactivity when assessing a patient’s eligibility for COVID-19 vaccines.

    Most importantly, the list leaves out an important group – caregivers and household members of people at high risk of severe illness from COVID-19 infection. This omission leaves high-risk people more vulnerable to exposure to COVID-19 from healthy people they regularly interact with. Multiple countries the new framework refers to do include this group.

    Why is the FDA requiring new clinical trials?

    According to the FDA, the benefits of multiple doses of COVID-19 vaccines for healthy adults are currently unproven. It’s true that studies beyond the fourth vaccine dose are scarce. However, multiple studies have demonstrated that the vaccine is effective at preventing the risk of severe COVID-19 infection, hospitalization and death in low-risk adults and children. Receiving multiple doses of COVID-19 vaccines has also been shown to reduce the risk of long COVID.

    The FDA is moving to risk-based access for COVID-19 vaccines.

    The FDA is requiring vaccine manufactures to conduct additional large randomized clinical trials to further evaluate the safety and effectiveness of COVID-19 boosters for healthy adults and children. These trials will primarily test whether the vaccines prevent symptomatic infections, and secondarily whether they prevent hospitalization and death. Such trials are more complex, costly and time-consuming than the more common approach of testing for immunological response.

    This requirement will likely delay both the timeliness and the availability of COVID-19 vaccine boosters and slow public health decision-making.

    Will low-risk people be able to get a COVID-19 shot?

    Not automatically. Under the new FDA framework, healthy adults who wish to receive the fall COVID-19 vaccine will face obstacles. Health care providers can administer vaccines “off-label”, but insurance coverage is widely based on FDA recommendations. The new, narrower FDA approval will likely reduce both access to COVID-19 vaccines for the general public and insurance coverage for COVID-19 vaccines.

    The FDA’s focus on individual risks and benefits may overlook broader public health benefits. Communities with higher vaccination rates have fewer opportunities to spread the virus.

    What about vaccines for children?

    High-risk children age 6 months and older who have conditions that increase the risk of severe COVID-19 are still eligible for the vaccine under the new framework. As of now, healthy children age 6 months and older without underlying medical conditions will not have routine access to COVID-19 vaccines until further clinical trial data is available.

    Existing vaccines already on the market will remain available, but it is unclear how long they will stay authorized and how the change will affect childhood vaccination overall.

    Libby Richards has received funding from the National Institutes of Health, the American Nurses Foundation, and the Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute

    – ref. FDA limits access to COVID-19 vaccine to older adults and other high-risk groups – a public health expert explains the new rules – https://theconversation.com/fda-limits-access-to-covid-19-vaccine-to-older-adults-and-other-high-risk-groups-a-public-health-expert-explains-the-new-rules-257226

    MIL OSI – Global Reports –

  • MIL-OSI USA: May 21st, 2025 Heinrich, Colleagues Introduce Senate Resolution Denouncing Two-Month Blockade on Food and Medicine in Gaza

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for New Mexico Martin Heinrich
    WASHINGTON — U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.) joined U.S. Senator Peter Welch (D-Vt.) to introduce a resolution calling on the Trump Administration to use all diplomatic tools at its disposal to bring an end to the blockade of food and life-saving humanitarian aid to address the needs of civilians in Gaza. In their resolution, the senators express grave concern about the ongoing humanitarian crisis in Gaza, including the imminent starvation of tens of thousands of children. 
    On March 2, 2025, the Israeli Government began blocking all food and emergency aid —including food, medicine, infant formula, fuel, and other lifesaving humanitarian supplies — from reaching Palestinian civilians in Gaza. In the same month, all 25 World Food Program (WFP)-supported bakeries in Gaza closed, wheat flour and cooking fuel ran out, and food parcels distributed to families — with two weeks of food rations — were depleted. According to the United Nations, about 10,000 children have been identified as suffering from acute malnutrition since January 2025. 
    “We must deliver critically needed food and medicine to innocent civilians in Gaza facing extreme hunger, death, disease and widespread destruction. While Israel has the right to defend itself, it must follow U.S. and international humanitarian law. Unfortunately, Israel has been and continues to act in direct violation of the requirements mandated under the Foreign Assistance Act and the Arms Export Control Act,” said Heinrich.
    “As we continue to pursue pathways to achieve a two-state solution, which remains crucial both for Palestinians’ sovereignty and self-determination and for Israel’s security in the region, we must work toward a long-term, post-war plan that can achieve lasting peace in the region,” Heinrich continued.
    The resolution is led by U.S. Senator Peter Welch (D-Vt.). Alongside Heinrich, the resolution is co-sponsored by U.S. Senators Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Michael Bennet (D-Colo.), Cory Booker (D-N.J.), Tammy Duckworth (D-Ill.), Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.), John Hickenlooper (D-Colo.), Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii), Tim Kaine (D-Va.), Angus King (I-Maine), Andy Kim (D-N.J.), Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), Ed Markey (D-Mass.), Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), Chris Murphy (D-Conn.), Patty Murray (D-Wash.), Jon Ossoff (D-Ga.), Jack Reed (D-R.I.), Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.), Elissa Slotkin (D-Mich.), Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii), Tina Smith (D-Minn.), Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), Mark Warner (D-Va.), Reverend Raphael Warnock (D-Ga.), Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), and Ron Wyden (D-Ore.).
    The senators’ resolution is supported by Anera, the Friends Committee on National Legislation, J Street, and Oxfam America.
    The full text of the resolution is here.

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: LEADER JEFFRIES RESPONSE TO TRUMP’S STATEMENT OF ADMINISTRATION POLICY

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Hakeem Jeffries (8th District of New York)

    Know Your Immigration Rights

    If you or a loved one encounter immigration enforcement officials, it is essential that you know your rights and have prepared your household for all possible outcomes.

    Ask for a warrant: The Fourth Amendment of the Constitution protects you from unreasonable search and seizure. You do not have to open your door until you see a valid warrant to enter your home or search your belongings.

    Your right to remain silent: The Fifth Amendment protects your right to remain silent and not incriminate yourself. You are not required to share any personal information such as your place of birth, immigration status or criminal history.

    Always consult an attorney: You have a right to speak with an attorney. You do not have to sign anything or hand officials any documents without speaking to an attorney. Try to identify and consult one in advance.

    The New York City Office of Civil Justice and the Mayor’s Office of Immigrant Affairs (MOIA) support a variety of free immigration legal services through local nonprofit legal organizations. To access these resources, dial 311 and say “Action NYC,” call the MOIA Immigration Legal Support Hotline at 800-354-0365 Monday through Friday from 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. or visit MOIA’s website.

    Learn more here: KNOW YOUR IMMIGRATION RIGHTS  – Congressman Hakeem Jeffries

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Rep. Aguilar Introduces the Housing Stability for Dreamers Act

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Representative Pete Aguilar (31 CD Ca)

    Last week, Reps. Pete Aguilar (D-CA-33), Juan Vargas (D-CA-52) and Sylvia Garcia (D-TX-29) introduced the Housing Stability for Dreamers Act. This bill would clarify that DACA recipients can access mortgages backed by the Federal Housing Administration (FHA), Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Department of Veterans Affairs (VA).
    During the first Trump Administration, the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) upended years of settled policy and began quietly denying DACA recipients federally-backed loans. This led a bicameral group of lawmakers, including Reps. Aguilar, Vargas and Garcia, to request an investigation into whether the agency violated the Administrative Procedure Act and asked the Biden Administration to clarify that DACA recipients can qualify for federally-backed mortgages. In March, the Trump Administration announced that DACA recipients would again no longer be eligible for government-backed mortgages.
    According to estimates, thirty percent of DACA recipients are homeowners. DACA recipients have made over $760 million in mortgage payments and made significant economic contributions that are felt in their communities and nationwide. Yet, without congressional action, DACA recipients will no longer have access to some of the most important government programs to support wealth building and stability. 
    “We need to make homeownership more accessible for everyone. Dreamers and their families contribute to our economy and communities in countless ways and should not face even more barriers to owning a home and living the American dream,” said Rep. Pete Aguilar. “I am proud to partner with Reps. Vargas and Garcia to introduce legislation that would give Dreamers the same shot at owning a home as everyone else.” 
    “Dreamers and their families deserve an equal opportunity to the American Dream. That starts by ensuring they can permanently benefit from the same federal homeownership opportunities offered to all Americans,” said Rep. Juan Vargas. “This legislation is critical as the Trump Administration continues to target and discriminate against Dreamers and all immigrants.”
    “Dreamers are our neighbors, our coworkers, and an essential part of our communities. They work hard, pay taxes, and contribute to our economy. For many, homeownership is the key to building stability and achieving the American dream. No one should be denied that opportunity simply because of where they were born,” said Rep. Sylvia Garcia. “As the Trump administration once again tries to strip away protections and limit access to basic programs like federally-backed home loans, this bill is about standing up for their humanity, their rights, and their future. I am proud to co-lead this bill alongside Rep. Vargas and Rep. Aguilar to eliminate systemic barriers in lending and make sure that Dreamers are treated with the dignity and respect they deserve.”
    In addition to Reps. Aguilar, Vargas and Garcia, the Housing Stability for Dreamers Act is cosponsored by Reps. Yassamin Ansari (D-AZ-03), Julia Brownley (D-CA-26), Salud Carbajal (D-CA-24), Joaquin Castro (D-TX-20), Jesus “Chuy” Garcia (D-IL-04), Jimmy Gomez (D-CA-34), Robert Menendez (D-NJ-08), Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-DC-At-Large), Scott Peters (D-CA-50), Shri Thanedar (D-MI-13), Rashida Tlaib (D-MI-12) and Nydia Velázquez (D-NY-07).Rep. Aguilar serves as Chair of the House Democratic Caucus and as a member of the House Committee on Appropriations.

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Oregon Department of Veterans’ Affairs to Host 2025 Veteran Benefit Expo and 80th Anniversary Celebration in Salem

    Source: US State of Oregon

    he Oregon Department of Veterans’ Affairs (ODVA) is proud to announce the return of its annual Veteran Benefit Expo, the state’s largest veteran resource event, on June 16th at the Salem Armory Auditorium, 2310 17th St. NE.

    This marks the first in-person Expo since 2019 and will also feature a special 80th Anniversary Celebration of ODVA beginning at 10 a.m.

    Organized by the Oregon Department of Veterans’ Affairs and presented in partnership with the Oregon Lottery and the Oregon Military Department, the Veteran Benefit Expo is a one-of-a-kind event and a one-stop shop for Oregon veterans of all eras and walks of life to learn about and access the full range of their earned benefits and local resources.

    More than 65 participating agencies, nonprofits and service providers will be on hand to provide in-depth information and direct services across a wide range of benefit areas, including health care, disability claims assistance, housing, emergency assistance, long-term care, mental health, education, business, recreation and more.

    “We are celebrating the 80th anniversary of ODVA by doing what we’ve always done: showing up for Oregon veterans and their families,” said ODVA Director Dr. Nakeia Council Daniels. “The Veteran Benefit Expo is more than an event — it is the heart of our mission brought to life: bringing vital resources and earned benefits into the communities where veterans live and work, and making sure they know they’re seen, valued, and supported.”

    This year’s Expo will also celebrate ODVA’s eight decades of service to Oregon’s veteran community, kicking off with the 80th Anniversary Ceremony at 10 a.m. on the Armory Auditorium stage, which will be immediately followed by a cake cutting and the opening of the Expo. The public is invited to attend.

    Space is limited, but there are still openings for state or local organizations who provide direct benefits to veterans and who are interested in being an exhibitor at this year’s Expo. Registration is free but is subject to approval by ODVA based on space and other considerations. To register, visit www.surveymonkey.com/r/orvetexpo25vendors.

    The Veteran Benefit Expo was first held in 2015 at the Salem Convention Center in honor of ODVA’s 70th anniversary and has grown to become the agency’s signature outreach event, drawing an estimated 500 to 600 veterans each year. Since its inception, the Expo has traveled to different regions of the state, with plans to continue rotating in future years to ensure broad access to benefits by the state’s diverse veteran population.

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Senators Warner, Kaine, Bennet Secure DOD Fixes to Broken Military Moving System

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Virginia Tim Kaine
    WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Senators Mark R. Warner (D-VA), Tim Kaine (D-VA), and Michael Bennet (D-CO) issued the statement below after the Department of Defense (DoD) announced immediate modifications to the military’s broken moving system, which handles servicemember relocations. These modifications follow close advocacy by the senators, who have pushed for months to address the delays, poor communication, and repeated issues under the Global Household Goods Contract.
    “Military members and their families sacrifice so much in service to our country, including every time they relocate and integrate into a new community. After pushing for months, we’re pleased to see the Department of Defense move to address ongoing challenges with the contract tasked with moving household goods for military members and families in the process of relocating.
    “As these policy changes are implemented, we will continue to work with the Department of Defense and TRANSCOM to ensure that servicemembers and military families who are already well into the relocation process are not left in the lurch. Additionally, as these shifts put more pressure on federal employees to adapt to this change, we will continue to push for adequate federal staffing levels and against Trump’s senseless hiring freeze, which continues to prevent critical positions from being filled across government.”
    In February, Warner requested a briefing from USTRANSCOM and sounded the alarm about missed household goods pickups, delivery issues, and communication difficulties with HomeSafe Alliance, the contractor responsible for the moves. Earlier this month, the lawmakers raised their concerns, reiterating the ongoing delays and confusion being faced by military families, and requesting additional information from TRANSCOM on its plan to address these issues.

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Tuberville Introduces Tuskegee President to Senate HELP Committee, Discusses Cost versus Benefits of Higher Education

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Tommy Tuberville (Alabama)
    WASHINGTON – Today, U.S. Senator Tommy Tuberville (R-AL) spoke with Dr. Andrew Gillen, Dr. Michael Lindsay, Dr. Mark Brown, Mr. Mike Pierce, and Dr. Russell Lowery-Hart during a Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) Committee hearing on the state of higher education. During the hearing, Sen. Tuberville discussed the reasons for the skyrocket of prices in higher education institutions during recent years. 
    Sen. Tuberville also introduced Dr. Mark Brown, President of Tuskegee University in Tuskegee, Alabama, to the Committee.
    Read Sen. Tuberville’s remarks below or watch on YouTube or Rumble. 
    Sen. Tuberville’s introduction of Dr. Brown can be found below or on YouTube or Rumble.

    INTRODUCTION OF DR. MARK BROWN:
    TUBERVILLE: “It’s my pleasure to introduce our second witness, Dr. Mark A. Brown. As a matter of fact, he’s about 20 miles from where I live, as we speak, in Auburn, Alabama. Dr. Brown is the president of Tuskegee University, home of the Tuskegee Airmen, who we’re very proud of. It’s a Historically Black College in Alabama. He is the first alumnus in Tuskegee’s 143-year-history to lead the university. A retired Air Force Major General, Dr. Brown brings unmatched experience in education leadership, federal student aid policy, and HBCU advancement. We are thankful to have you here today to hear your perspective, Dr. Brown. “
    ON THE COST OF HIGHER EDUCATION:
    TUBERVILLE: “Gentlemen, thanks for being here. I’m passionate about this. I spent [40] years in education—more than anybody in this room probably, maybe other than Dr. Graham, although you spent a little time in the military. I’ve been in high schools all across this country, almost in all 50 states. We’ve gone backwards. [We’re here] today to talk about higher education. I spent 30 years in that and have done a lot of great things for a lot of kids, men and women, rich and poor. It’s got to be merit based, folks. If we don’t merit base this thing, we will not survive as an educational system. This country gives you an opportunity.
    I was in a situation where athletics was merit-based. I didn’t care who you were. I had to win games. I recruited kids that had good grades, would go to class, and could play football. And if they couldn’t do those three things and work at it, I didn’t recruit them. It’s got to be the same thing in college in terms of getting a good education. I know of a school that has a happiness degree. That [isn’t] gonna get it. I’m for paying everybody’s way through college, but not for a degree where when they get out, they can’t get a job at Walmart. We need degrees that kids can prosper [with], raise a family, and have a great life in this country. So, I’d like to ask each one of you just one question, starting over with Dr. Gillen.
    Dr. Gillen, what factors do you see that have caused massive skyrocketing costs at our universities across the country?”
    GILLEN: “So, I would argue that the main driver of higher college cost is what’s called the Bowen Revenue Theory of Cost. When you look at higher education, […] the idea here is not that, you know, higher faculty salaries or increases in institutional aid are driving higher spending. It’s that when more revenue is available, colleges will spend as much as they can. And it makes sense, these are all mission driven institutions, right? If you give each of these schools a million more dollars, they’ll find a good way to spend it. The problem is if you keep doing that, eventually those good ways to spend it aren’t so convincing anymore. But when we have these mission driven institutions, the more money they have, the more money they’re going to spend.”
    TUBERVILLE: “Dr. Lindsay?”
    LINDSAY: “I think the opportunity that is before is, as you say, to bring accountability and outcomes. And I think we have to be very intentional about the kind of formation that’s occurring on our campuses. I’m really proud of the fact that we have something called the Good Work Initiative, which is basically trying to transform on campus employment opportunities where students are paid a little bit more than minimum wage to give them a little bit more spending money, but we also pair it with professional development and vocational discernment exercises to help them. So, that when they graduate, they actually have that kind of professional experience. It’s a pilot [program]. We’ve had good success with it. We’re allowing the opportunity for more students to take on more leadership roles, giving them good things for their resumes, but also buttressing their opportunities when they graduate.”
    TUBERVILLE: “Dr. Brown?”
    BROWN: “Senator, I’ll use a real example. I went to my Board of Trustees for this upcoming year and said that I would like to freeze tuition for two years at our school. They approved the freezing of the tuition, but when I looked at the cost of insurance—which is a subcomponent of that tuition—we had to go up. So, the real cost to the customer—the family—was more.
    The same is true of the cost of dining, the cost of food that goes into a dining hall contract, and the cost of the utilities it takes to run the campus. My campus is much like any other business. Those costs, we would not be able to absorb, and so our cost went up because costs in the economy went up. It was not that we would spend more because we had more. Those costs were real, and we had to realize those as a school [that] operates just like a business in that sense.”
    LOWERY-HART: “Thank you for the question. I would say in the community college sector, there hasn’t been a massive skyrocket rising in prices. At Austin Community College, we haven’t raised tuition in 12 years. I think we’ve raised it once in 15 [years]. We’re the sector of higher education that lives within our means, because our students are so price-sensitive. And I think there could be a lot to learn from how community colleges effectively manage their budgets.”
    TUBERVILLE: “I agree with you on that. I’ve been in a lot of community colleges. You do a good job, by the way. And I think more kids need to go to community colleges.
    Mr. Pierce?”
    PIERCE: “I think it’s my turn to talk about for-profit colleges, which seems to be missing from my colleague’s responses to your question. We have watched the proprietary sector raise costs far in excess of other sectors of the higher education system. And we’ve also watched some of the largest participants in the for-profit college market turn into private non-profit colleges or enter into deals with public colleges. I think we’re not at a place where we were a decade ago talking about the proprietary sector. We should be looking at the backroom deals that some of the largest colleges in the country are cutting with these private companies and how these deals are driving the increase in costs that are being pushed on our most vulnerable students.”
    TUBERVILLE: “Good. Thank you.
    Thank you, Mr. Chairman.”
    Senator Tommy Tuberville represents Alabama in the United States Senate and is a member of the Senate Armed Services, Agriculture, Veterans’ Affairs, HELP and Aging Committees.

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI Canada: Construction begins on student housing at SFU, more child care on the way

    Source: Government of Canada regional news

    Students, staff and the surrounding community are one step closer to more on-campus supports at Simon Fraser University (SFU) – Burnaby as construction starts on a new student residence and will begin later this year on a new child care facility.  

    “A safe and secure place to live and conveniently located child care can be transformative for students and parents working or studying on campus,” said Bowinn Ma, Minister of Infrastructure. “These new facilities will provide shorter commute times, allow students to focus on their studies and help ease pressure on the local rental market.  Projects like this are one way we are investing in infrastructure that supports people in B.C.”

    The new eight-storey residence will provide an additional 445 beds for students at the Burnaby campus. It will include a mix of studio and four-bedroom apartments, as well as two- and four-bedroom townhouses. Construction is expected to start in fall 2025 on a stand-alone child care centre, which will add 160 new child care spaces to more than 410 existing spaces in the Burnaby campus and at SFU’s Sapperton location. With these new spaces, more than 570 child care spaces will provide support to the SFU community.

    Once complete, the residence will bring the total number of student beds on the SFU Burnaby campus to more than 3,000.  

    “I have met with many students at post-secondary campuses in B.C., and access to housing and child care are big factors when deciding if they can afford to build a better life for themselves,” said Anne Kang, Minister of Post-Secondary Education and Future Skills. “Since 2018, our government has made historic investments in student housing, making it easier for thousands of students across the province to gain the skills they need to fill the in-demand jobs our economy needs.”

    Construction is expected to be completed on the student-housing residence and child care facility in fall 2027. The total capital cost of the project is $196.6 million, shared between the Province and SFU.

    This project is Phase 3 of SFU’s ongoing student-housing expansion. Phases 1 and 2 added a combined 856 new beds for students, with funding for Phase 2 provided by the Province.

    “Watching the Phase 3 site come to life has reinforced how vital new student housing is for our community,” said Ali Asgar Abdul Udaipurwala, a fourth-year undergraduate student at SFU’s Beedie School of Business, who lives in residence at the Burnaby campus. “As a community adviser and area co-ordinator, I have loved planning late-night events, movie nights and study breaks in our halls. I am excited for Phase 3 to become our next home away from home.”

    Since 2018, the government has committed $2 billion to expand on-campus student housing at public post-secondary institutions throughout B.C. To date, 6,100 beds for students are open, with another 4,600 underway.

    Since 2018, ChildCareBC’s space-creation programs have helped fund the creation of more than 40,900 new licensed child care spaces in B.C., with more than 24,900 of those operational. This child care project received $16 million through the ChildCareBC New Spaces Fund, which is jointly supported by provincial investments and federal funding provided under the 2021-22 to 2025-26 Canada-British Columbia Canada-wide Early Learning and Child Care Agreement. British Columbia and the federal government signed an extension to the agreement for 2026-27 to 2030-31.

    Quotes:

    Joy Johnson, president, Simon Fraser University –

    “We are grateful for the Province’s continued investment in student housing and child care across the province. I look forward to continued growth of SFU’s resident student community on Burnaby Mountain and to continued partnership with the provincial government as we move forward. The post-secondary sector is united in our efforts to support British Columbians in tackling shared challenges, from housing to health care and beyond, as we make a difference for students and for communities across B.C.”

    Rohini Arora, parliamentary secretary for child care, and MLA for Burnaby East –

    “Creating 160 new child care spaces on SFU campus, where hard-working students, families and single parents can easily access the care they need, is one of the ways we are helping Burnaby get ahead. By ensuring parents, especially mothers, can access high-quality child care in Burnaby while attending higher education or working, we are setting both this generation and the next up for success.”

    Learn More:

    For more information about Simon Fraser University, visit: https://www.sfu.ca/

    MIL OSI Canada News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Alford Re-Launches Long-Range Strike Caucus

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Representative Mark Alford (Missouri 4th District)

    Today, Congressman Mark Alford (MO-04) announced the launch of the Long-Range Strike Caucus for the 119th Congress. The Caucus provides an informal, bipartisan opportunity to educate Members of Congress on current and future U.S. bomber capabilities, advocate for this essential instrument of national security, and facilitate engagement between Congress, industry, and the Department of Defense. The Caucus is co-chaired by Rep. Don Davis (NC-01).

    “We’re proud to re-launch the Long-Range Strike Caucus for this Congress,” said Congressman Alford. “As the Congressman for Whiteman Air Force Base—the home of the B-2 Spirit, and soon the B-21 Raider—I have witnessed first-hand the strategic necessity of our long-range strike capabilities. Last October, I was in the Middle East when our heroic airmen showed the world what they can do, striking terrorist lairs in Yemen with pinpoint precision. That’s not just power. It’s a promise that America can reach out and touch anyone, anywhere, at any time when freedom is at stake. I look forward to bipartisan collaboration on how we can ensure America maintains its superior long-range strike capabilities well into the future.”

    “As our nation confronts emerging global threats to national security, the Long Range Strike Caucus can play a significant role in our defense and in safeguarding the American people,” said Congressman Don Davis. “Modernizing our long-range strike aircraft, particularly our bombers, is essential to ensuring that the U.S. military continues to be the world’s premier fighting force.”

    Background:

    The Long-Range Strike Caucus advocates for our nation’s bomber force and the many missions that support our bombers in conducting long-range strikes. This includes active duty, guard, and reserve units that provide fighter escort, suppression of enemy air defenses, air refueling, testing, acquisition, and depot maintenance.

    The Air Force bomber fleet provides a unique ability for the U.S. to rapidly strike any target in the world, an essential capability for deterring our enemies and reassuring our allies and partners.

    Despite its active use and global presence, our bomber fleet is the smallest and oldest it has ever been. With an average age of more than 40 years old, almost half of our current long-range strike aircraft pre-date the Cuban Missile Crisis. The failure to adequately modernize has impacted our ability operate, especially in potentially contested environments. Therefore, efforts to develop and procure a new generation of Air Force bombers, including the B-21 Raider and refitted B-52J, are critical to the conventional and nuclear national security apparatus.

    ###

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: De La Cruz Introduces Sgt. Freddy Gonzalez Congressional Gold Medal Act

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Monica De La Cruz (TX-15)

    Ahead of Memorial Day, Congresswoman Monica De La Cruz (TX-15) introduced the Sergeant Alfredo “Freddy” Gonzalez Congressional Gold Medal Act to posthumously recognize Edinburg-native Sgt. Gonzalez’s service during the Vietnam War.

    “Every Memorial Day, we are reminded that our freedoms are not free. Sgt. Freddy Gonzalez is a South Texas hero who sacrificed his life to protect the soldiers in his platoon. Though we can never repay his sacrifice, the Congressional Gold Medal shows our nation’s appreciation for his heroism and will carry on his legacy for years to come.” – Congresswoman Monica De La Cruz

    Background: 

    The Sgt. Freddy Gonzalez Congressional Gold Medal Act instructs the Secretary of the Treasury to issue a gold medal dedicated to Sgt. Gonzalez to recognize his service and sacrifice during the Vietnam War.

    Sgt. Gonzalez displayed extraordinary bravery and leadership as a platoon commander. While under heavy enemy fire, he maneuvered his unit and saved a wounded comrade despite being injured himself. He continued to lead his men and refused medical attention even after being seriously wounded. He continued to lead his platoon up until his death.

    His actions led to accolades, including the Medal of Honor, the Purple Heart, the Presidential Unit Citation, the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze stars, the Vietnamese Cross of Gallantry with star, the Vietnamese Cross of Gallantry with palm, the Military Merit Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal, and the namesake of the USS Gonzalez.

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Senate Passes Durbin’s Bipartisan Resolution Honoring The Four American Service Members Who Died In Lithuania

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Illinois Dick Durbin
    May 21, 2025
    The resolution recognizes the soldiers’ service and sacrifice to our nation and NATO allies
    WASHINGTON – U.S. Senate Democratic Whip Dick Durbin (D-IL), Co-Chair of the Senate Baltic Freedom Caucus, today commended the unanimous Senate passage of his bipartisan resolution honoring the four American soldiers—including one Illinoisan—who were stationed in Lithuania and tragically died in March while on a mission to recover a vehicle immobilized during a training exercise. The soldiers include Staff Sergeant Jose Dueñez Jr. from Joliet, Illinois; Staff Sergeant Edvin F. Franco; Staff Sergeant Troy S. Knutson-Collins; and Private First-Class Dante D. Taitano—all part of the 1st Armored Brigade, 3rd Infantry Division.
    “Last night, the Senate honored the brave American service members, including Staff Sergeant Jose Dueñez Jr. from Joliet, Illinois, who tragically died during a mission in Lithuania earlier this year.  It was a mission fraught with extreme danger and challenges, and this resolution reminds us of the daily service and sacrifice of our military members,” Durbin said.  “The resolution also expresses our gratitude to our Lithuanian ally—who dropped everything and faced great odds to help us recover their bodies and bring these fallen soldiers home—a reminder of the common defense underlying our alliance.”
    On April 3, thousands of Lithuanians took to the streets in Vilnius—including the Lithuanian President—to pay their respects to our fallen American soldiers. The resolution also reaffirms the importance of the NATO alliance and the need to support our Baltic allies.
    Durbin spoke about the four American soldiers and his resolution on the Senate floor last month.
    Text of the resolution can be found here.
    Joining Durbin in sponsoring the resolution are U.S. Senators Chuck Grassley (R-IA), Chuck Schumer (D-NY), Mitch McConnell (R-KY), Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH), Tammy Duckworth (D-IL), Chris Coons (D-DE), Adam Schiff (D-CA), Gary Peters (D-MI), Elissa Slotkin (D-MI), and Alex Padilla (D-CA).
    -30-

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Hawley, Durbin Reintroduce Bill Combatting Online Child Sexual Abuse Material 

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Josh Hawley (R-Mo)

    Wednesday, May 21, 2025

    Today, U.S. Senators Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) and Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) reintroduced the STOP CSAM Act. The legislation will crack down on the proliferation of child sexual abuse material (CSAM) online by allowing victims to sue companies that host it. Senators Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), and Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.) have cosponsored the bill.
    The Senators announced the legislation’s reintroduction in February ahead of their joint hearing highlighting witnesses impacted by CSAM, including survivors, advocates, and law enforcement experts. They originally introduced the legislation last Congress and garnered the votes to unanimously advance it through the Senate Judiciary Committee. 
    “Every day that Congress fails to protect kids online is another day that online predators can victimize children and steal their innocence—and social media companies are totally complicit,” said Senator Hawley. “To stop them, Congress must give parents and victims the right to sue these companies, and my bipartisan legislation would empower them to do just that.”
    “In the real world, child safety is a top priority. But in the virtual world, criminals and bullies don’t need to pick a lock or wait outside the playground to cause harm. They can harass, intimidate, addict, or sexually exploit our kids without leaving home,” said Senator Durbin. “Big Tech has woefully failed to police itself, and the American people are demanding that Congress intervene. We made significant headway last year to address Big Tech’s failure to protect our kids online and it’s time to build on that progress. I’m glad to partner with Senator Hawley to reintroduce our bill supporting victims of child sexual exploitation and increasing accountability for tech companies.”
    Senator Hawley has been a leading proponent of holding Big Tech accountable and protecting kids online. Last year, he questioned Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg about the rampant child exploitation on his social media platforms, prompting him to stand up and apologize to the families of victims in the room.
    Senator Hawley also introduced legislation to allow any private citizen to sue Big Tech platforms for hosting CSAM. After striking a deal with Senator Durbin to advance the CSAM legislation, the bipartisan bill was eventually blocked on the Senate floor.
    Read the full bill text here. 

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Padilla, Schiff Condemn Trump Administration’s Student Visa Revocations

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Alex Padilla (D-Calif.)
    WASHINGTON, D.C. — U.S. Senators Alex Padilla, Ranking Member of the Senate Judiciary Immigration Subcommittee, and Adam Schiff (both D-Calif.) blasted the Trump Administration’s recent harmful revocations of international student visas, including on ideological grounds, underscoring the lack of due process regarding these revocations and the chilling effect of these actions in suppressing freedom of thought and expression. In their letter to Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Kristi Noem, the Senators condemn the revocation of hundreds of California student visas and Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s (ICE) termination of several hundred California students’ Student and Exchange Visitor Information System (SEVIS) records.
    The Senators called on the State Department to immediately stop their “Catch and Revoke” AI-powered initiative, an effort to monitor millions of social media accounts of student visa holders and green card holders to gather evidence of alleged terrorist sympathies. The technology is reportedly being used to monitor international students’ speech through SEVIS and other publicly available resources, leading to the revocation of student visas or green cards for students exercising peaceful expression, without due process. This step to surveil international students’ activity is an unprecedented leap toward stifling students’ First Amendment rights and their freedom of speech. The Senators pushed for restoring revoked visas and full transparency.
    While the Department of Justice has reversed the termination of students’ SEVIS records, the student visa revocations under Catch and Revoke remain ongoing and are instilling fear and uncertainty among international students at colleges and universities in California and across the country.
    “These visa revocations and record terminations constitute unprecedented and unconstitutional attacks on freedom of thought and expression that impact international and U.S. citizen students alike at our nation’s colleges and universities,” wrote the Senators. “While we welcome the news that the Administration has taken steps to rectify the SEVIS record terminations, these actions taken all together still call into question our nation’s bedrock commitment to freedom of expression. We urge the State Department and DHS to suspend the ‘Catch and Revoke’ initiative, which continues to cause uncertainty, erode due process, and chill free speech and expression among students.”
    “The actions taken as part of the ‘Catch and Revoke’ initiative suggest a troubling pattern of misusing immigration enforcement to suppress dissent, intimidate politically active students, and chill Constitutionally protected expression,” continued the Senators. “Without transparency or independent oversight, the risk of abuse continues to grow. In fact, USCIS is now openly targeting speech by noncitizens with other immigration statuses, not just students.”
    The Senators detailed a series of other alarming incidents targeting international students, as ICE has detained students on university campuses, at ports of entry, and in their own homes, often without notice or time to contact an attorney. Many of these cruel arrests were based on limited information within these students’ visa applications and violate the right to due process.
    “Reports indicate that ICE has arrested students based on vague or previously disclosed information in their visa applications — such as social media posts, protest participation, or lawful political associations — as justification for their detention,” added the Senators. “If true, these practices represent not just an overreach of immigration authority but a violation of students’ First Amendment rights. These processes do not appear to be conducted with consideration for students’ due process and require immediate remediation.”
    Padilla and Schiff highlighted the immense contributions international students make to colleges and universities in California and nationwide. California’s more than 140,000 international students contribute roughly $6.4 billion to the U.S. economy and support about 55,114 jobs. These students also strengthen and help the United States secure its global leadership in science, technology, and research; protect U.S. national security interests; and promote innovation.
    The Senators emphasized the critical role California’s higher education system plays in powering the U.S. economy and warned that the attacks on the state’s international students jeopardize the country’s economic future.
    “California’s higher education system is the largest in the nation and considered one of the best in the world, driving global economic mobility—and fueling California’s growth into the fourth largest economy in the world,” wrote the Senators. “These institutions serve as beacons of opportunity and economic potential that transform the lives of hundreds of thousands of students in providing a better life for themselves, their families, and future generations. However, this Administration’s attacks on institutions of higher education and international students, who add immense value to our universities, puts our nation’s economic future at risk.”
    Last month, Senators Padilla and Schiff joined 34 Democrats in pressing the Trump Administration to reconsider recent decisions to revoke student visas. In 2021, Padilla led a group of 23 Senators in calling on the State Department to address the backlog of visas for international students. Padilla also chaired a hearing entitled “Strengthening our Workforce and Economy through Higher Education and Immigration” in 2022, highlighting the challenges undocumented students and international students face in seeking higher education and obtaining jobs in the United States.
    Full text of the letter is available here and below:
    Dear Secretary Rubio and Secretary Noem:
    We write to express our increasing concern about actions targeting international students by the State Department and by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Starting earlier this year, the State Department began revoking hundreds of student visas including on apparent ideological grounds, revoking roughly a hundred visas in California alone. These revocations have been conducted by the State Department through its AI-enabled “Catch and Revoke” initiative, instructing affected students to leave the country voluntarily or risk facing deportation proceedings. At the same time, ICE began terminating Student and Exchange Visitor Information System (SEVIS) records for thousands of students—leaving them uncertain about their ability to continue their studies. This includes at least two hundred students in California.
    These visa revocations and record terminations constitute unprecedented and unconstitutional attacks on freedom of thought and expression that impact international and U.S. citizen students alike at our nation’s colleges and universities. While we welcome the news that the Administration has taken steps to rectify the SEVIS record terminations, these actions taken all together still call into question our nation’s bedrock commitment to freedom of expression. We urge the State Department and DHS to suspend the “Catch and Revoke” initiative, which continues to cause uncertainty, erode due process, and chill free speech and expression among students.
    Colleges and universities across the U.S. have long benefitted from the enrollment and participation of international students, who contribute immensely to academic, scientific, and cultural life at schools all around the country. This should not be a partisan issue—there are over 1.1 million international students all over the country, across many states, and the District of Columbia. California enrolls more than 140,850 international students who contribute approximately $6.4 billion to our economy, supporting around 55,114 jobs. Nationally, over 1.12 million international students contribute roughly $43.8 billion to the U.S. economy and support over 370,000 jobs. They also strengthen our national security by fostering global partnerships, cross-cultural understanding, and long-term diplomatic ties with future world leaders educated in the U.S. By attracting top talent from around the globe, we bolster our workforce, drive innovation, and better position ourselves to maintain our competitive edge in science, technology, and research.
    In addition to the State Department visa revocations, multiple alarming incidents have surfaced in recent months involving international students detained by immigration enforcement at university campuses, ports of entry, and even in their homes. In a significant departure from normal practice, these students were, in many cases, not provided prior notice and given no time to contact an attorney, leaving many with few options to defend their nonimmigrant status and their ability to continue studying in the United States. Reports indicate that ICE has arrested students based on vague or previously disclosed information in their visa applications—such as social media posts, protest participation, or lawful political associations—as justification for their detention. If true, these practices represent not just an overreach of immigration authority but a violation of students’ First Amendment rights. These processes do not appear to be conducted with consideration for students’ due process and require immediate remediation.
    The actions taken as part of the “Catch and Revoke” initiative suggest a troubling pattern of misusing immigration enforcement to suppress dissent, intimidate politically active students, and chill Constitutionally protected expression. Without transparency or independent oversight, the risk of abuse continues to grow. In fact, USCIS is now openly targeting speech by noncitizens with other immigration statuses, not just students.
    California’s higher education system is the largest in the nation and considered one of the best in the world, driving global economic mobility—and fueling California’s growth into the fourth largest economy in the world. These institutions serve as beacons of opportunity and economic potential that transform the lives of hundreds of thousands of students in providing a better life for themselves, their families, and future generations. However, this Administration’s attacks on institutions of higher education and international students, who add immense value to our universities, puts our nation’s economic future at risk.
    We urge your agencies to take immediate corrective action by suspending the Catch and Revoke initiative, restoring revoked visas, and providing full transparency to ensure that our immigration system is not misused to police speech at our colleges and universities and maintain beneficial international exchange at universities. We look forward to your prompt response.
    Sincerely,

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Chairman Mast Delivers Opening Remarks at Hearing on FY26 State Department Posture

    Source: US House Committee on Foreign Affairs

    Media Contact 202-321-9747

    WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Brian Mast delivered opening remarks at a full committee hearing titled, “FY26 State Department Posture: Protecting American Interests.”

    Watch Here

    -Remarks-

    Since day one, President Trump and yourself, you’ve taken bold action to clean house, to restore accountability, to slash waste, and to put America—and Americans—first. I would say that this was desperately needed.

    In the past two decades alone, the State Department’s budget grew from about $9.5 billion to over $55 billion. And I think we could all easily say: for what? In any way, shape, or form did our foreign policy feel like it was five times more effective under Joe Biden? I think everybody would say no.

    Instead, we had a State Department that was literally a slush fund for many far-left bureaucrats, grifting non-government organizations, and foreign adversaries like the Taliban. We had our tax dollars went to things like vouchers for migrants at our southern border, mobilizing elderly lesbians to vote in Costa Rica, as well as drag shows, LGBT comic books, musicals, plays, and operas.

    That stuff was not PEPFAR, to say the least. It didn’t make America safer. It didn’t make America stronger. It didn’t bring other countries closer to us, and it didn’t save lives.

    Now, many of my colleagues might think that canceling these programs creates an inroad for China. I would say we could only hope that China is stupid enough to spend money in that way.

    I want to thank this administration for bringing charges against those who, it appears, were stealing from the State Department and USAID—and, in turn, the American people.

    And I want to thank you, Secretary Rubio, for reorganizing the State Department into a lean and effective diplomatic operation.

    Let’s give proof of that.

    Just this past week alone, President Trump secured more than $2 trillion of investment from the Middle East. That is more than ten times what Joe Biden secured from the Middle East during his entire four years in the White House—which is not entirely surprising, considering under the Biden State Department, millions were spent on programs like trans inclusion in Tunisia. That was the focus in the Middle East.

    Now, as you know, Secretary Rubio, the job is not done. Up until now, over 80% of the State Department has been unauthorized. We have bureaus and offices that have grown from thousands of dollars to billions of dollars, and that changes in law when we pass the first comprehensive and stand-alone State Department reauthorization that has occured since 2002.

    I look forward to working with the members of this committee. I look forward to working with you, Secretary Rubio, and I look forward to working with Senator Risch, moving forward, to make sure that one thing—and one thing alone—takes place: Every single dollar and diplomat that we authorize and send into the field puts America first.

    ###

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Unlocking Albany’s Potential Through Revitalization

    Source: US State of New York

    [embedded content]

    [embedded content]

    The comprehensive approach to the CAP Initiative also includes up to $150 million to transform cultural experiences in and around Albany’s Downtown, such as renovating the New York State Museum and upgrading the exhibits to be more inviting to Albany families and tourists alike. It also includes funding to invest in improvements at the Empire State Plaza to strengthen connections with the surrounding community and make the space a vibrant and inviting part of the fabric of downtown Albany.

    Additionally, Governor Hochul has committed up to $40 million to advance plans to reimagine I-787 which would include reconnecting Albany and surrounding communities and enhancing access to the Hudson River waterfront. This summer, the New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT) will release a Planning and Environment Linkages (PEL) study on potential ways to reimagine I-787, a travel corridor in the Capital Region that provides high speed access to the City of Albany and other communities along the river, including Green Island, Watervliet and Menands. Building upon the work completed under the PEL study, up to $40 million will be utilized by NYSDOT to begin an Environmental Impact Statement, which will lay the groundwork for a future project along the I-787 corridor. The environmental review will examine ways to enhance waterfront access along the Hudson River for all users of the road, connect neighborhoods and key destinations in communities along the corridor, and address the infrastructure of I-787, the South Mall Expressway, the Dunn Memorial Bridge, and additional infrastructure along the study area.

    Governor Hochul previously announced $19.5 million in State investments to improve public safety in Albany, which included a $1 million commitment to the City of Albany Police Department and $500,000 for the Albany County Sheriff’s Office. These investments reflect a record level of State funding for public safety in the City of Albany and Capital Region. These resources are delivered through a series of nation-leading programs supported by the Division of Criminal Justice Services (DCJS), including the Gun Involved Violence Elimination (GIVE) initiative, the Capital Region Crime Analysis Center, the SNUG Street Outreach and Social Work Program and Project RISE (Respond, Invest, Sustain and Empower). Working together, these efforts have helped reduce violence and improve community safety.

    Albany is not only our great state’s capital city, it’s also a place I call home. This investment isn’t just about dollars and cents, it’s about jobs, innovation and a brighter future for our community.

    Governor Kathy Hochul

    Informed by input from local stakeholders and the community, the CAP Initiative will unfold through a comprehensive public engagement process to identify key opportunities to promote business development, bolster public safety, encourage housing, attract visitors and enhance affordability.

    Empire State Development President, CEO and Commissioner Hope Knight said, “Since Governor Hochul first proposed the Championing Albany’s Potential initiative in her State of the State, ESD has been working to establish the foundation upon which this historic investment in our Capital City will build. Working together, we will utilize this generational funding to support transformational projects that reflect the needs of those who live, work and visit the city, and encourage even more people to experience and explore Downtown Albany.”

    New York State Office of General Services Commissioner Jeanette Moy said, “The historic investment Governor Hochul is making through the Championing Albany’s Potential initiative will help revitalize our capital city. It will also strengthen the ties between state government and our neighbors living and working in the communities surrounding the Capitol and Empire State Plaza. CAP is a sustainable plan for long-term growth that will spur public-private partnerships, build a thriving city center, and create a vibrant downtown for residents and visitors alike.”

    New York State Homes & Community Renewal Commissioner RuthAnne Visnauskas said, “Albany deserves a downtown that is a place people want to visit, live, work, connect, and celebrate. It’s a place rich with history that has been wounded by planning decisions that negatively impacted entire neighborhoods. This $400 million investment will directly boost the city’s potential as an attractive destination by unwinding past mistakes and disinvestment. We’ve made strides recently in Governor Hochul’s administration, investing in upgrading affordable housing and reclaiming vacant land and buildings for development. Now, through CAP, there’s real momentum to rebuild, replan holistically with community involvement and revive our beautiful Capital City for those who live and work here now and for those who will enjoy its future.”

    New York State Department of Transportation Commissioner Marie Therese Dominguez said, “The Hudson River is one of the Capital Region’s greatest natural assets, and over the past few years the Department of Transportation has made key investments to reconnect residents and visitors with the waterfront, including projects like the Albany Skyway – a linear park; building the Empire State Trail and today, the Livingston Avenue Rail Bridge, which is currently in construction. The I-787 corridor is a vital piece in reimagining the City of Albany and its waterfront, which is why the Governor’s investment in the next stage of this project is so important. For a number of years now, the project team at NYSDOT has engaged with communities all along the Hudson River to gather ideas and feedback and most importantly, listen to local residents – the people who work and live here, on the future of this corridor. The funding for the next stage of this project – an Environmental Impact Statement – was included in this year’s budget and brings us one step closer to advancing from the ideation stage to the preliminary design and eventual construction phase, as we work to study the real potential this corridor offers for travel, recreation and tourism as well as economic growth throughout the Capital Region.”

    New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services Commissioner Rossana Rosado said, “Through Governor Hochul’s unparalleled leadership on public safety, cities across New York State are receiving record resources to ensure safer and stronger communities. These investments and initiatives – spanning evidence-based policing strategies, crime analysis center support, community violence interventions, and neighborhood empowerment programs – help keep New Yorkers safe, ensure a fair and effective justice system, and build opportunities for young people and families. Here in the Capital Region, DCJS is proud to support dozens of our law enforcement and community-based partners as they continue to drive down gun violence and crime.”

    State Senator Patricia Fahy said. “I’m incredibly proud that the core of our Capital Region and the 46th District, downtown Albany, will receive $400 million in transformative, once-in-a-generation funding. For years, I’ve engaged with our community to chart a new path forward for Albany that includes Reimagining I-787, making the State Museum a 21st Century destination-location, expanding the core of our Capital Region: downtown Albany, and so much more. That’s why I’m so proud this year’s budget includes $200 million for downtown revitalization, $150 million for upgrading the New York State Museum, $40 million for the next phase of the reimagining I-787 study, and $1 million for addressing public safety in our neighborhoods. Now, the hard work begins in earnest. I look forward to engaging our community, stakeholders, and residents as we move forward with this funding. Make no mistake: together, these initiatives will usher in a new day for the Capital Region, the impacts of which will be felt for years, if not generations to come—if we get it right. I want to thank my legislative colleagues and the Governor for recognizing the value of investing in our Capital City’s success, and for helping deliver this funding in this year’s state budget.”

    Assemblymember John T. McDonald III, RPh said “This historic funding is incredible news for the City of Albany and the entire Capital Region. The revitalization of the New York State Museum, the reimagining of I-787, much-needed improvements to the Empire State Plaza and other investments are transformative projects that will enhance connectivity, celebrate our history, and create new opportunities for residents and visitors alike. These efforts reflect years of advocacy and collaboration, and I thank Governor Hochul for her continued commitment to supporting the City of Albany and strengthening the Capital Region as a whole.”

    Assemblymember Gabriella A. Romero said, “These investments truly are an investment in Albany’s potential and in making it a city all New Yorkers can be proud to call our capital. Revitalizing downtown, strengthening small business, expanding affordable housing – these are all valuable steps to uplift Albany. I thank the Governor for her leadership in championing this historic investment and Championing Albany’s Potential.”

    Embedded Flickr Album

    Albany County Executive Daniel P. McCoy said, “Governor Hochul’s Championing Albany’s Potential (CAP) Initiative has the potential to be transformational. It’s a historic commitment to the heart of Albany County that will bring new housing, new business, and new life into downtown. A reimagined Albany is exactly what we need, and I’m proud to stand with the governor in this effort.”

    Albany Mayor Kathy Sheehan said, “This $400 million investment is a testament to the hard work of the City of Albany over the last 12 years to be ready to write the next great chapter in the history of New York’s Capital City. The pandemic taught us that we need to reimagine our downtowns to get more feet on the street by creating more housing, supporting our small businesses, enhancing public safety, and attracting world-class amenities, and this transformative investment will do just that and more. To steal a phrase from President Biden, this is truly a ‘big effing deal.’ My sincere thanks and appreciation to Governor Hochul for seeing what we all see in the City of Albany: a city that’s full of pride and potential and ready to soar to even greater heights. I also want to thank Senator Fahy, Assemblymember Romero, and Assemblymember McDonald, as well as the entire State Legislature for making this critical investment in their home away from home.”

    Advance Albany County Alliance CEO Kevin O’Connor said, “The Advance Albany County Alliance thanks Governor Hochul for her thoughtful leadership and timely commitment to revitalizing New York’s Capital City. The City of Albany is not only the front door of state government, it is the heartbeat of Upstate New York’s fastest-growing county and the springboard for the local economy. The Governor’s disciplined approach through the CAP Initiative will ensure that state funding achieves the greatest possible positive impact. Through this partnership, we will supercharge our placemaking efforts, improve public spaces, secure a safe and welcoming downtown environment, and stimulate the central corridor of the Capital Region.”

    Capitalize Albany Corporation President Ashley Mohl said, “With Governor Hochul’s focus and support fueled by this historic more than $400 million investment, New York’s capital city stands on the brink of transformative growth. Our board and staff look forward to working with ESD and MIG alongside our many local and other state economic development partners to maximize this funding and seize this incredible opportunity. To build on the Governor’s CAP Initiative, Capitalize Albany is looking forward to advancing its planned solicitation for qualified development teams interested in acquisition and redevelopment of the Liberty Park site. Our RFP will engage the market directly with the aim to attract strong interest and a range of RFP responses. If you’re a developer or team with a project for the Liberty Park site, we welcome your response.”

    Downtown Albany BID Executive Director Georgette Steffens said, “In my 25 years of doing economic development in Downtown Albany, this is the largest investment we’ve ever seen. On behalf of nearly 200 property owners and over 120 restaurants and retail-related businesses, I want to express my profound gratitude to Governor Hochul and the Legislature for their commitment to Albany. We are already seeing the effects of the CAP initiative, with a renewed wave of investment interest in Downtown Albany beginning to percolate. The future of our city’s core is incredibly bright thanks to the Governor’s investment, and I look forward to working together to make Downtown a stronger and more vibrant place to live, work, and experience.”

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-Evening Report: E-bikes for everyone: 3 NZ trials show people will make the switch – with the right support

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Caroline Shaw, Associate Professor in Public Health, University of Otago

    Getty Images

    Anyone who uses city roads will know e-bikes have become increasingly popular in Aotearoa New Zealand. But we also know rising e-bike sales have been predominantly driven by financially well-off households.

    The question now is, can e-biking be accepted and embraced by people and communities where it is currently not happening? Three pilot programmes from around the country have now given us cause for optimism.

    Understanding more about the barriers to e-bike access – especially in communities with low cycling levels or where income levels mean bikes are prohibitively expensive – has been one of the main gaps in our knowledge.

    But over the past few years, we have been involved in projects designed to examine how e-bikes might work in such places. The three pilots were based in Mangere (South Auckland), Wainuiomata (Lower Hutt) and Sydenham (Christchurch).

    These are all areas or communities with lower relative incomes and lower levels of cycling. The majority of individuals involved did not routinely cycle, and some hadn’t been on a bike for decades.

    In all three pilots, the results were positive. In some cases, participants reported long-term, life-changing benefits.

    What the pilot schemes showed

    Each pilot was different. The Mangere programme loaned e-bikes to people for two to three months between 2022 and 2023 through a community bikehub. The Wainuiomata programme involved a longer loan period of one year over 2023, and was run through a health provider at a local marae.

    The Christchurch programme, which ran between 2021 and 2024, was a free e-bike share scheme for tenants in a specific social housing complex, organised through a partnership with a shared e-bike provider.

    Where needed, participants in all pilots were supported as they gained riding confidence and knowledge of safe cycling routes.

    Participants in all the pilot programmes found e-biking acceptable, and they used and enjoyed the bikes. While these pilots were not set up to measure distance travelled, we know from other research that participants in e-bike access schemes ride on average 5km per day, half of which replaces car trips.

    Individuals reported practical benefits such as being able to travel to their jobs, mental and physical health improvements, and not having to pay for petrol each week.

    In the Wainuiomata pilot there were wider ripple effects, with participants reporting whānau members also started cycling as a result of the loan scheme. In one case, ten members of the wider whānau got involved.

    Good cycling infrastructure will encourage e-bike uptake.
    Getty Images

    3 policy actions needed now

    These results mirror what we know already about how e-bikes can improve physical and mental health, reduce transport greenhouse gas emissions, and make cities nicer places by reducing car use.

    Compared to conventional bikes, e-bikes also allow people to bike further and in hillier places. They are also great for groups with traditionally lower levels of cycling, such as people with health conditions, disabilities, older people and women.

    It also seems concerns about increased rates of injury may be less significant than initially thought. Overall, the broad benefits of e-bikes have seen hundreds of access schemes developed globally, including many in New Zealand.

    Combining international evidence and experience with the information from the three local pilot programmes, we see three main policy areas that will increase e-bike uptake and use in New Zealand.

    1. Physical infrastructure: this is needed to support cycling in all our cities and larger towns, and would involve a combination of cycle lanes and low-traffic neighbourhoods, alongside expanded bike parking and storage.

    The Climate Change Commission has recommended these networks be constructed, and experience from Wellington shows rapid construction is possible.

    2. Targeted access schemes: these help people who can’t afford e-bikes. Without targeting, such schemes tend to be mainly used by the well-off. It’s likely we will need a range of options, such as short-term and long-term low-cost (or free) loans, rent-to-buy schemes or subsidies.

    People should be able to access these schemes through a variety of organisations so as to target different motivations: saving money, improving health, commuting for work, ferrying children, environmental concern.

    3. Local organisation networks: these support individuals and communities to access bikes, maintain them, provide rider training, run bike libraries, route finding and community events to support and encourage people to ride.

    This wider support was a key factor to the success of the all pilots. Local organisations, champions and leaders are essential to help overcome some of the practical and cultural barriers that exist because we have such low levels of cycling.

    Change is achievable

    What we have outlined constitutes a different way of doing business for the transport sector. But there are already organisations doing a lot of this work, including bike hubs and cycling community organisations.

    Others have infrastructure in place that could expand to encompass e-bike programmes, such as marae and community health centres. What is needed is a commitment to support these activities as part of core transport business policy.

    We don’t need to wait for more research. The three things required – building infrastructure, increasing access and providing support programmes – are all understood and achievable.

    E-bikes can and should play an important role in expanding New Zealand’s transport options and improving the wellbeing of its people.

    Caroline Shaw receives funding from the Health Research Council of New Zealand, University of Otago and Waka Kotahi/New Zealand Transport Agency.

    Karen Witten receives funding from the Health Research Council of NZ, Ministry of Business Innovation & Employment,
    Waka Kotahi/NZTA and Auckland Council.

    Simon Kingham receives funding from Ministry of Business Innovation & Employment.

    – ref. E-bikes for everyone: 3 NZ trials show people will make the switch – with the right support – https://theconversation.com/e-bikes-for-everyone-3-nz-trials-show-people-will-make-the-switch-with-the-right-support-255956

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

  • MIL-Evening Report: Please don’t tape your mouth at night, whatever TikTok says. A new study shows why this viral trend can be risky

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Moira Junge, Adjunct Clincal Associate Professor (Psychologist), Monash University

    K.IvanS/Shutterstock

    You might have heard of people using tape to literally keep their mouths shut while they sleep. Mouth taping has become a popular trend on social media, with many fans claiming it helps improve sleep and overall health.

    The purported benefits of mouth taping during sleep are largely anecdotal, and include claims of better airflow, less snoring, improved asthma symptoms, less of a dry mouth, being less likely to have bad breath, and better sleep quality.

    As the trend has gained momentum in recent years the claims have also come to include improved skin, mood and digestion – and even a sharper jawline.

    The rationale for mouth taping during sleep is to encourage breathing through the nose rather than through the mouth. When a person’s nasal passages are blocked, breathing switches from the nose to the mouth. Mouth breathing has been linked to conditions such as obstructive sleep apnoea.

    But is mouth taping an effective way to address these issues, and is it safe? A new review suggests taping your mouth shut while you sleep offers limited benefits – and could pose risks.

    What did the review find?

    In a new paper, Canadian researchers reviewed the scientific literature on mouth taping, searching for studies that mentioned terms such as “mouth breathing”, “mouth taping” and “sleep”.

    They searched specifically for studies looking at people with known mouth breathing and breathing-related sleeping problems such as obstructive sleep apnoea to understand the potential benefits and harms of mouth taping for this group.

    Obstructive sleep apnoea is a condition where your airway is partly or completely blocked at times while you’re asleep. This can cause you to stop breathing for short periods, called “apnoeas”. Apnoeas can happen many times a night, resulting in lowered oxygen levels in the blood as well as sleep disruption.

    The researchers found ten eligible studies published between 1999 and 2024, with a total of 213 participants. Eight studies looked at mouth taping, and two studies involved using a chin strap to keep the mouth shut.

    Only two studies identified any benefits of mouth taping for mild obstructive sleep apnoea. The observed improvements – to measures such as oxygen levels in the blood and number of apnoeas per hour – were modest.

    And although they were statistically significant, they were probably not clinically significant. This means these changes likely wouldn’t make much difference to symptoms or treatment decisions.

    The remainder of studies found no evidence mouth taping helps to treat mouth breathing or related conditions.

    Mouth taping has become a popular social media trend.
    K.IvanS/Shutterstock

    What’s more, four studies warned about potential serious harms. In particular, covering the mouth could pose a risk of asphyxiation (lack of oxygen that can lead to unconsciousness or death) for people whose mouth breathing is caused by significant blockage of the nasal airways. This kind of nasal obstruction could be a result of conditions such as hay fever, deviated septum, or enlarged tonsils.

    In other words, mouth taping is definitely not a good idea if you have a blocked nose, as it’s unsafe to have both the nose and the mouth obstructed at the same time during sleep.

    What’s the take-home message?

    The authors concluded there are very few benefits and some potential serious risks associated with mouth taping in people who are mouth breathers or have obstructive sleep apnoea.

    They did however note we need further high-quality evidence to better understand if mouth taping is safe and works.

    This review didn’t focus on any research relating to mouth taping for proposed improvements to mood, skin, digestion, sharper jaw lines and other things, so the researchers could not draw conclusions about the efficacy and safety of mouth taping for those purposes.

    Snoring is one of the problems mouth taping has been suggested to help with.
    Kleber Cordeiro/Shutterstock

    Internationally, qualified sleep health professionals do not recommend mouth taping.

    If you have concerns about your sleep, the best thing to do is to consult trusted scientific sources or a health-care professional who will be able to guide you to address the underlying causes of your sleep challenges.

    Trying social media trends such as mouth taping before you seek expert advice could lead to delays in diagnosing serious conditions for which there are evidence-based treatments available.

    Mouth taping should definitely not be attempted in children.

    It’s possible that in some healthy adults, without respiratory conditions, without significant sleep disorders, and who don’t have tape allergies, that mouth taping could pose little harm and produce some modest benefits. But we don’t have enough evidence yet to know one way or the other.

    Moira Junge is CEO of The Sleep Health Foundation. She is also affiliated with the Healthylife Health Advisory Board and is a psychologist and clinic director at Yarraville Health Group.

    – ref. Please don’t tape your mouth at night, whatever TikTok says. A new study shows why this viral trend can be risky – https://theconversation.com/please-dont-tape-your-mouth-at-night-whatever-tiktok-says-a-new-study-shows-why-this-viral-trend-can-be-risky-256901

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

  • MIL-Evening Report: Labor now has the political clout to reset Australia’s refugee policy. Here’s where to start

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Mary Anne Kenny, Associate Professor, School of Law, Murdoch University

    Australia’s policy towards refugees and asylum seekers stands at a critical juncture.

    Global displacement is at record highs and many countries are retreating from their responsibilities. At this moment, Australia can lead by example.

    As Australia’s prime minister, Anthony Albanese, said on election night:

    We do not need to beg or borrow or copy from anywhere else. We do not need to seek our inspiration overseas. We find it right here in our values – and in our people.

    Those values should guide a principled and evidence-based response to the global refugee crisis. This response should be grounded in fairness, humanity and respect for Australia’s international human rights obligations.

    A principled reset

    Australia is a signatory to the 1951 Refugee Convention, which defines a refugee as a person who has a well-founded fear of persecution based on:

    • race
    • religion
    • nationality
    • membership of a particular social group
    • political opinion.

    However, aspects of Australia’s current approach to refugees have drawn criticism from the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, Filippo Grandi.

    The new Labor government could use its strength in parliament to initiate a principled and evidence-based reset. This could include:

    • creating a new emergency visa for humanitarian crises to assist people fleeing conflict

    • improving the efficiency and fairness of the asylum seeker process

    • ending offshore processing of refugees

    • streamlining the family reunification process

    • making immigration detention an option that could be used at the discretion of the Department of Home Affairs, instead of being mandatory

    • giving people access to independent review of their detention

    • improving systems for LGBTQ+ asylum seekers (many of whom face heightened risks, are not always believed about their sexuality, and lack culturally sensitive support).

    There are four key areas in particular need of reform.

    1. Ending the legal limbo

    A crucial priority is resolving the status of some 7,000 people who are part of what’s known as the “legacy caseload”.

    These people were refused refugee status under a problematic and now-defunct process known as the “fast track assessment”. They are now on bridging visas and in legal limbo.

    A solution is also needed for the roughly 1,000 people who were detained in offshore processing centres in Manus Island and Nauru but are now living in Australia. They are also on bridging visas, also in a state of legal uncertainty.

    People in both these groups have endured 13 years in legal and policy limbo. Reform is long overdue.

    One option is to allow people in both groups who were previously refused protection to apply for a permanent visa without requiring yet another drawn-out assessment of their protection claims.

    Community organisations, legal experts and mental health professionals could help the government develop clear, trauma-informed and evidence-based processes for reviewing their cases.

    2. Expanding the numbers

    Australia’s main way of accepting refugees is via what’s known as the humanitarian program. But the number of refugees accepted under this program doesn’t currently reflect the scale of global displacement.

    Labor has proposed expanding the number of refugees Australia takes.

    It has suggested Australia take 27,000 through the core Refugee and Humanitarian Program and an additional 10,000 through two pathways:

    At the UN’s 2023 Global Refugee Forum, the Australian government committed to gradually implementing this increase, beginning in 2023–24.

    A dedicated advisory and coordination body could help with planning and implementation.

    It’s also worth noting current policy prohibits asylum seekers registered with the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees in Indonesia after June 2014 from being resettled to Australia.

    The new government could also consider lifting this arbitrary restriction to give these vulnerable refugees access to durable solutions.

    3. Strengthening the rights of children and young people

    Immigration systems are largely designed around adults. Children and young people are too often overlooked.

    As a result, children have been:

    Children (including those born in Australia) can’t sponsor their parents via family sponsorship processes. They’re denied a say in decisions that deeply affect their lives.

    The Migration Act should be amended to require that all decisions affecting children give primary consideration to the best interests and views of the child. This would be in line with Australia’s obligations under the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child.

    Similar principles are already embedded in Australian family law and child protection policy, providing a clear model for reform.

    4. Reviewing Australia’s boat turnback policy

    Since 2013, Australia has intercepted boats under Operation Sovereign Borders, using turnbacks and takebacks with little independent oversight.

    The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees has raised concerns about this policy.

    Sometimes during these interactions Australian officials detain and interview people on boats about their reason for trying to enter Australia, but details about what happens during such encounters are kept largely secret. Most of these encounters end with the boat and people on it being returned to the country from which they came.

    A recent document published by the Commonwealth Ombudsman reported on conditions aboard vessels used for maritime detention.

    It found serious problems, including no private spaces for sensitive interviews and no interpreters on board.

    The Department of Home Affairs responded by saying formal interviews use accredited interpreters. However, the report highlights many crucial interactions do not.

    There is also no time limit on detention at sea, and no independent monitoring of how protection claims are assessed.

    A more comprehensive review is urgently needed.

    Mary Anne Kenny is a member of the Migration Institute of Australia and the Law Council of Australia and an affiliate of the UNSW Kaldor Centre for International Refugee Law. She was on the Ministerial Council on Asylum Seekers and Detention (an independent advisory body) between 2012 and 2018.

    – ref. Labor now has the political clout to reset Australia’s refugee policy. Here’s where to start – https://theconversation.com/labor-now-has-the-political-clout-to-reset-australias-refugee-policy-heres-where-to-start-255971

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

  • MIL-Evening Report: Playing the crime card: do law and order campaigns win votes in Australia?

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Chloe Keel, Lecturer in Criminology and Criminal Justice, Griffith University

    Crime and public safety are usually the domain of state politics. But the Coalition tried to elevate them as key issues for voters in the recent federal election.

    Claiming crime had been “allowed to fester” under Labor, the opposition promised a A$750 million Operation Safer Communities plan, which included police strike teams targeting drugs, a national child sex offender register, and more money for Neighbourhood Watch.

    A Coalition government would also have given grants to community groups to install public lighting, bollards and CCTV cameras.

    But in the end, crime did not appear to be a deciding factor in the election, which was easily won by Labor.

    What does that tell us about leveraging public fear – either existing crime fears and general anxieties, or latent concerns that can be triggered – for political gain in Australia? Can it be a successful strategy?

    Stoking anxiety

    In culturally diverse countries, such as Australia and the United States, law and order rhetoric sometimes calls for supporting aggressive crime policies at the expense of racial and ethnic minorities, many of whom are immigrants.

    These policies can be effective in stoking public fear to win votes. US President Donald Trump’s exhortations on immigration and crime were a significant part of his election campaigns in 2016 and 2024.

    However, what experts call “protective factors”, such as strong communities and social cohesion, are important. They can reduce the influence of political narratives that try to define crime in narrowly punitive or racialised terms.

    Australia is not America

    Our peer-reviewed research, which will be published in the Journal of Criminology, investigated how public concerns about crime and safety in Australia and the US were associated with demographic factors that evolved over time. The study drew on data from the World Values Survey and indicated key differences in what makes Australians and Americans feel unsafe.

    We have found that in Australia in 2018, supporters of left-leaning parties (Labor/Green) reported feeling significantly safer than other voters. However, this gap disappeared when researchers took into account attitudes that blame crime problems on immigrants. This suggests immigrant-blaming in Australia can drive feelings of community fear and insecurity.

    The World Values Survey uncovered a different pattern in the US.

    Between 2011 and 2017, Republican voters reported feeling safer than other Americans – the opposite of Australia’s trend. The political divide in the US couldn’t be explained by immigrant-blaming attitudes. Rather, it was attributed to the “self-isolation” of American conservatives in more culturally homogeneous communities.

    Our study indicated that while immigration continued to influence safety perceptions in the US, it appeared to operate through different mechanisms than in Australia. Racial and ethnic minorities reported greater fear as the 2010s unfolded.

    Social connectedness also plays differently in each country. In Australia, trust in others and confidence in public institutions consistently influences safety perceptions. In the US, these factors have little impact.

    Social scientists have observed that in modern societies, responsibility for personal safety has increasingly shifted from the government to individuals. This trend is strong in the US, where market-focused, neoliberal economic and social policies dominate policies.

    By contrast, European research suggests stronger social welfare systems can reduce safety concerns by addressing underlying economic anxieties. Australia’s more robust social support appears to foster greater feelings of safety.

    Our research indicates social cohesion further helps reduce fear.

    Crime fears are not a vote winner

    Electoral strategies that seek to leverage public insecurities need to be understood in the context of these fear-mitigating factors. Media diversity can also counter fear-based messaging.

    In the 2018 Victorian election, crime became a prominent political issue through racialised commentary targeting “African gangs”. However, it failed to gain decisive political traction.

    Research found fear of crime was relatively rare in Victoria. Media reports of crime and comments by political leaders were distant from their own experiences

    With more diverse news sources and online platforms, political actors can no longer promote narratives unopposed. Fear-based messaging can backfire, especially when it overreaches.

    Outdated strategy

    Perceptions of crime are often shaped by a combination of actual crime rates and broader anxieties about social change, cultural difference, and uncertainty. This is frequently expressed as unease about the increasing presence of culturally diverse groups.

    While the coalition’s pivot to law-and-order rhetoric represented a familiar strategy, Labor positioned itself as the party of unity. This was underscored by Foreign Minister Penny Wong’s declaration after Labor won the election, in which she acknowledged

    […] the power in our 26 million people from more than 300 ancestries […] from the oldest continuing civilisation on the planet and I acknowledge the traditional owners. Friends, we love this country.

    Foreign Minister Penny Wong on election night.

    While harnessing fears of crime and cultural diversity was not effective in this election cycle, this is not the end of law and order politics. But the unique characteristics of this election appear to have rendered the formula less potent.

    Trump’s threat to democracy and the constitutional rule of law in the US may have fostered a sense of solidarity and social cohesion among Australian voters. Our research suggests this helped to mitigate fears about crime.

    The temptation to capitalise on law and order may continue to appeal to politicians. But in Australia, at least, there is no guarantee it will work.

    The authors do not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and have disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    – ref. Playing the crime card: do law and order campaigns win votes in Australia? – https://theconversation.com/playing-the-crime-card-do-law-and-order-campaigns-win-votes-in-australia-256780

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Welch, Shaheen Lead 20 Colleagues in Call to Protect ENERGY STAR 

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Peter Welch (D-Vermont)
    WASHINGTON, D.C. — U.S. Senator Peter Welch, Ranking Member of the Senate Agriculture Subcommittee on Rural Development, Energy, and Credit, this week joined Senator Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.) in leading 20 of their colleagues urging the Trump Administration to immediately reverse course on its plan to illegally and unilaterally terminate the ENERGY STAR program. In their letter, the Senators highlight the cost-saving benefits of the program, which is projected to save the average American household $450 on utility bills each year simply by choosing ENERGY STAR certified products.  
    Since 1992, ENERGY STAR has reduced energy costs for American families and businesses by $500 billion, including $42 billion worth of savings in 2020 alone. For every federal dollar spent on ENERGY STAR, Americans have enjoyed $350 in savings. 
    “For over three decades, the ENERGY STAR program has lowered Americans’ energy bills by informing consumers about energy efficient products. The program has enjoyed bipartisan support since its creation under authority of Section 103 of the Clean Air Act, most recently receiving $35.7 million in fiscal year 2025 appropriations,” wrote the Senators. “Reporting has indicated, however, that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) plans to eliminate ENERGY STAR without Congressional approval. Not only is the program protected under federal statute and thus illegal for the Administration to terminate unilaterally, but this decision also lacks basic economic sense. We write to urge you to immediately reverse course.” 
    The Senators continued: “ENERGY STAR is the epitome of an effective public-private partnership. As the program’s administrators, EPA and the Department of Energy set qualifying energy efficiency standards for products. EPA also protects the integrity of the ENERGY STAR brand, ensuring it remains well-known, trusted, and indicative of a quality product. Appliance manufacturers then voluntarily display the ENERGY STAR label, notifying consumers that a product will reduce their energy consumption and lower utility bills. The program strengthens consumer choice by sharing critical product information.” 
    “Eliminating the ENERGY STAR program will not only raise energy costs for American families and businesses, but also inflict far-reaching economic harms, threatening industry jobs and the reliability of the grid at a time of growing demand. We again urge you to immediately reconsider eliminating this popular and effective Congressionally authorized program,” the Senators concluded. 
    Administered by the EPA and Department of Energy, ENERGY STAR is a voluntary, market-based program that has saved consumers billions of dollars annually. The ENERGY STAR program has cumulatively reduced four billion metric tons of harmful emissions and currently supports more than 790,000 American jobs manufacturing and installing ENERGY STAR products.  
    ENERGY STAR is strongly supported by a wide array of manufacturers, homebuilders, housing organizations, building owners, small businesses, and other organizations. In April, the U.S. Real Estate Industry sent a letter to the Trump Administration expressing its strong support for the ENERGY STAR program. Additionally, the U.S. Green Buildings Council partnered with the Alliance to Save Energy in leading over 1,000 organizations in urging the Trump Administration to protect the program and maintain full funding and staffing levels. 
    In addition to Senators Welch and Shaheen, the letter was signed by Senators Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), John Fetterman (D-Pa.), Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii), Angus King (I-Maine), Chris Coons (D-Del.), Ed Markey (D-Mass.), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), Tammy Baldwin (D-Wis.), Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii), Lisa Blunt Rochester (D-Del.), Tina Smith (D-Minn.), Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), Michael Bennet (D-Colo.), and Cory Booker (D-N.J.). 
    Read and download the full letter. 

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI: Best Same Day Payday Loans for Quick Cash in 2025: MoneyMutual Picked as the Top Pick for Guaranteed Approval

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Las Vegas, NV, May 21, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) —

    In today’s unpredictable economy, financial emergencies rarely come with a warning. A sudden car repair, medical bill, or missed paycheck can send even the most prepared households into a scramble. In such moments, speed isn’t just convenient, it’s essential.

    As Americans increasingly turn to fast, flexible lending options, the demand for same-day payday loans has surged. Just as we expect rapid food delivery and real-time updates, financial solutions must also keep pace. Consumers want cash in hand, not tomorrow, but today.

    Amid a crowded field of lenders and brokers, MoneyMutual has emerged as the leading online platform connecting borrowers with trusted same-day payday loan providers. Recognized for its efficiency, wide lender network, and secure process, MoneyMutual stands out as the top choice for those seeking fast financial relief in a pinch.

    Stay with us as we take a closer look at how MoneyMutual works and why it’s become the go-to resource for same-day lending solutions in 2025.

    >> Consider MoneyMutual for Same Payday Loans >>

    Overview of the Leading Same Day Payday Loan Connection Service – MoneyMutual

    When time is of the essence and financial relief can’t wait, MoneyMutual stands at the forefront of same-day payday loan connection services. With a reputation built on speed, simplicity, and trust, the platform offers a fast and accessible route for borrowers seeking immediate financial support.

    Speed of Potential Funding: One of MoneyMutual’s standout features is its ability to facilitate rapid access to funds, often as soon as the same business day. After submitting a short application, borrowers are swiftly connected with a lender from the platform’s expansive network. If approved, funds can be deposited directly into the applicant’s bank account within hours, depending on the lender’s processing times and bank policies.
    Extensive Lender Network: MoneyMutual doesn’t issue loans directly. Instead, it acts as a trusted intermediary, linking users to an array of verified online payday lenders. This expansive network increases the chances of loan approval by matching borrower needs with the criteria of various lending partners.

    >> Visit MoneyMutual to Find Out More >>

    Key Evaluation Factors

    To determine why MoneyMutual stands out among same-day payday loan connection services, several key factors were assessed, from lender quality to user experience.

    Quality and Size of Lender Network
    MoneyMutual partners with over 60 lenders, ranging from specialized payday providers to short-term installment loan companies. These are vetted for reliability and compliance, offering borrowers a better shot at finding a match tailored to their financial situation.

    Accessibility of Loan Options
    The platform supports a broad range of loan amounts, typically between $100 and $5,000, depending on individual lender terms and borrower qualifications. This flexibility accommodates everything from small emergencies to more urgent, moderate expenses.

    Potential for Rapid Funding
    Once connected with a lender, borrowers may receive funds as quickly as within 24 hours, and in some cases, the same day. This makes MoneyMutual a highly attractive option for those facing time-sensitive financial stressors.

    Platform Usability
    The MoneyMutual website is designed for ease and efficiency, featuring mobile compatibility and streamlined navigation. Borrowers can apply, review offers, and connect with lenders all within minutes.

    Simple Application Process
    Filling out MoneyMutual’s secure online form typically takes under five minutes. Applicants provide basic information about their income, employment status, and banking details. Once submitted, the platform immediately begins matching them with potential lenders.

    Features for Borrowers
    MoneyMutual allows users to compare loan offers from multiple lenders in one place. This increases transparency and empowers users to select the option that best meets their needs.

    Transparency of Lender Terms
    While MoneyMutual itself doesn’t dictate terms, it emphasizes partnerships with lenders that clearly disclose loan amounts, repayment dates, APRs, and fees, a crucial feature in helping borrowers make informed decisions.

    Ease of Navigation
    The website features a clean, modern interface with clear calls-to-action and informative content. Even first-time users will find it intuitive to use on desktop or mobile.

    Typical Loan Parameters
    Loan amounts facilitated through MoneyMutual generally range from $100 to $5,000, with repayment periods often between 14 and 30 days, depending on the lender and state regulations. Some lenders may offer extended terms for installment loans.

    >> Consider MoneyMutual for Same Payday Loans >>

    Pros and Cons of MoneyMutual for Same Day Payday Loans

    In a financial climate where speed often matters most, MoneyMutual has emerged as a go-to marketplace for borrowers seeking same day payday loans. But how does it really stack up? We take a closer look at the platform’s key advantages and potential drawbacks as more Americans turn to short-term lending for emergency expenses.

    Pros:

    • Potential for Fast Fund Access: Many users report receiving funds as soon as the next business day, sometimes even within hours, depending on the lender.
    • Large Network of Participating Lenders: MoneyMutual connects users with a broad pool of lenders, increasing the chances of finding a match, even with less-than-perfect credit.
    • Streamlined Online Application Process: The initial form takes just minutes to complete, making it ideal for time-sensitive borrowing needs.
    • User-Friendly Online Platform: The website is simple to navigate, guiding applicants from inquiry to lender match with minimal friction.
    • Opportunity to Compare Multiple Loan Offers: Users can review different offers and select terms that best align with their needs before committing.

    Cons:

    • MoneyMutual Is Not a Direct Lender: The platform acts as a facilitator, meaning users must evaluate and finalize terms with third-party lenders independently.
    • Loan Terms and Interest Rates Vary by Lender: APRs, repayment windows, and fees differ widely, and borrowers must scrutinize each offer carefully.
    • Payday Loans Typically Involve High Interest Rates and Fees: Even when fast cash is needed, these loans can become costly, especially if rolled over or extended.

    How to Utilize MoneyMutual for Potential Same Day Payday Loans

    As financial pressures grow for millions of Americans, platforms like MoneyMutual are seeing increased usage from borrowers in need of quick cash. Here’s how consumers can navigate the service to potentially access same day payday loans.

    Step-by-Step Process:

    • Visit the Official MoneyMutual Website: Begin by going to MoneyMutual.com, where users can start the loan inquiry process directly from the homepage.
    • Complete the Secure Online Application Form: Applicants are asked to enter basic personal and financial information. The form typically takes just a few minutes and is encrypted to protect sensitive data.
    • Review Loan Offers from Lenders in the Network: Once submitted, the system distributes the application to a network of participating payday lenders. Eligible borrowers may receive multiple offers to compare.
    • Examine Terms and Conditions Carefully Before Accepting: Each lender sets its own rates, fees, and repayment requirements. Experts caution that borrowers should read all terms closely and ensure they understand the total repayment cost before agreeing to any loan.

    With no obligation to accept an offer, MoneyMutual serves as a free intermediary rather than a direct lender. However, borrowers should be aware of state-specific payday loan regulations and consider all financial alternatives before proceeding.

    Types of Short-Term Financial Assistance Facilitated by MoneyMutual

    As rising costs and inflation strain household budgets, Americans are increasingly turning to alternative lending platforms for fast, flexible cash solutions. Among them, MoneyMutual has gained traction as a major online marketplace that connects borrowers with lenders offering a variety of short-term financial products. While the platform itself isn’t a direct lender, it facilitates access to multiple loan types tailored for immediate financial relief.

    Here’s a closer look at the key types of loans available through the MoneyMutual network:

    • Payday Loans: These are brief, high-cost loans intended to cover expenses until the borrower’s next paycheck. Loan amounts are typically small, often between $100 and $1,000, but carry high interest rates and fees. While controversial due to their cost, payday loans remain a common solution for those facing sudden emergencies like utility shutoff notices or medical expenses.
    • Short-Term Loans: This broader category includes installment loans and other forms of lending with short durations, usually ranging from a few weeks to several months. These loans may offer slightly more favorable repayment terms than traditional payday loans and can be used for a variety of needs, such as auto repairs, rent payments, or temporary income disruptions.
    • Bad Credit Loans: For borrowers with low credit scores or limited credit history, MoneyMutual helps facilitate access to lenders willing to work with higher-risk applicants. These loans come with elevated interest rates but offer a vital financial lifeline to consumers often excluded from traditional banking systems.
    • Cash Advances: Cash advances are designed for rapid disbursement, sometimes within 24 hours, and are ideal for extremely time-sensitive expenses. Typically repaid from the borrower’s next paycheck, these loans are often used to bridge the gap between pay periods or when an unexpected cost arises.

    While these financial products can offer short-term relief, experts caution they should be used carefully. Borrowers are urged to read loan terms closely, understand all associated fees, and assess whether repayment timelines align with their income schedule. Platforms like MoneyMutual may provide access, but financial responsibility lies squarely with the borrower.

    Customer Support and Resources Offered by MoneyMutual

    As more consumers turn to online lending marketplaces for fast financial relief, support and transparency have become increasingly important. MoneyMutual offers a basic but functional support system designed to guide users through the lending process.

    Unlike direct lenders, MoneyMutual serves as an intermediary, connecting users with its network of more than 60 short-term lenders. Because of this, its customer support doesn’t extend to loan management or repayment issues, which must be handled directly with the individual lender. However, the platform does provide users with access to key resources that help clarify how the loan matching process works.

    The company maintains a comprehensive FAQ section on its website, offering clear answers to common questions about eligibility, the loan request process, credit requirements, and fund disbursement. The site also outlines what borrowers can expect after being matched with a lender and encourages users to review terms carefully before signing any agreement.

    The platform doesn’t offer live chat or in-depth financial education tools, it emphasizes its role as a free service to connect borrowers with loan offers, placing the responsibility of further communication and decision-making on the user.

    Potential Disbursement Methods Through MoneyMutual’s Network

    As more consumers turn to online lending platforms for fast financial relief, how those funds are delivered becomes just as critical as loan approval itself. MoneyMutual, one of the most recognized payday loan marketplaces, connects borrowers with a wide range of lenders, each offering different methods of disbursing funds.

    • Direct Deposit to Bank Account: The most widely used and efficient method among lenders in the MoneyMutual network is direct deposit. Once approved, borrowers may receive funds directly into their checking account, often within 24 hours. For many facing urgent expenses, this speed and convenience are a significant advantage.
    • Other Methods (Varies by Lender): While direct deposit remains the standard, some lenders may offer alternative electronic disbursement options, such as ACH transfers or prepaid debit card funding. However, availability can vary by lender and borrower location, and these alternatives may affect how quickly funds are accessible.

    Borrowers using MoneyMutual should confirm disbursement methods and timelines directly with their matched lender to ensure there are no delays in accessing their funds.

    Navigating Same Day Payday Loans Responsibly: Important Cautions

    Same day payday loans can serve as a financial lifeline in moments of crisis, but they must be approached with caution. The high interest rates, short repayment terms, and risk of repeat borrowing make them a risky option for most consumers. 

    By understanding the costs, reading loan terms carefully, and seeking alternative financial solutions where possible, borrowers can protect themselves from unnecessary financial hardship. Responsible borrowing begins with informed decision-making, and when in doubt, seeking professional financial guidance is always a wise move.

    Understand the High Costs
    Same day payday loans may provide fast funds, but they are among the most expensive forms of borrowing available. These loans typically carry high interest rates, with annual percentage rates (APRs) that can reach or exceed 300%. 

    In many cases, the fees and interest owed may be nearly as much as the original loan amount. For example, borrowing $300 could cause repaying $375 or more in just two weeks. Without a clear repayment strategy, the costs can escalate quickly, especially if the borrower is forced to extend or roll over the loan.

    Review Loan Terms Carefully
    Payday loans are legally required to disclose all terms and fees, but borrowers often overlook the fine print. Each lender may have different repayment policies, fees for late or missed payments, or clauses that allow for automatic withdrawal from a borrower’s checking account. 

    Carefully reviewing these terms before accepting a loan is essential. Understanding the total repayment amount, due date, and what happens if repayment is delayed can help prevent surprises and avoid spiraling fees.

    Borrow Only What You Can Repay
    It may tempt you to borrow the maximum amount offered, especially when facing financial stress. However, payday loans are due in full within a short timeframe, usually on your next payday. Borrowing more than you can reasonably afford to repay can quickly result in bounced payments, overdraft fees, or the need to take out additional loans.

    A good rule of thumb is to borrow the minimum amount needed and ensure that full repayment can be made from your next paycheck without jeopardizing other essential expenses.

    Be Aware of Short Repayment Periods
    Unlike personal loans or credit cards that allow for flexible monthly payments, payday loans are typically due in a lump sum within 14 to 30 days. This compressed repayment window can strain already tight budgets.

    Missing the repayment deadline can trigger additional fees and result in a cycle of borrowing and debt accumulation. Many borrowers find themselves having to take out new payday loans just to cover the previous ones, further increasing financial stress.

    Consider Alternatives First
    Before committing to a payday loan, it’s worth exploring other, less expensive borrowing options. Credit unions often offer Payday Alternative Loans (PALs), which feature lower interest rates and longer repayment periods. Some banks provide small-dollar personal loans with predictable terms. 

    Other alternatives include negotiating payment plans with utility companies, seeking temporary hardship assistance from local nonprofits, or utilizing buy now, pay later services for specific purchases. These alternatives may not offer instant cash, but they typically come with fewer long-term risks and better repayment flexibility.

    Recognize the Risk of Debt Traps
    One of the most concerning aspects of payday loans is the potential for borrowers to fall into a debt trap. Many payday loan users find themselves unable to repay the full balance on time and must take out another loan to cover the previous one. This cycle of borrowing and repayment often continues for months, with fees compounding at every step. 

    Over time, a small loan can grow into a major debt burden, affecting a borrower’s ability to meet other financial obligations and damaging their overall financial stability.

    Seek Financial Advice if Needed
    For those considering payday loans or currently struggling with repayment, seeking help from a financial advisor or credit counselor can be a valuable step. Nonprofit credit counseling agencies offer free or low-cost services that include budgeting support, debt management plans, and guidance on safer borrowing options. 

    Some states and local governments also provide financial education programs to help consumers better understand loan terms and credit usage. Accessing these resources can provide long-term financial strategies that reduce reliance on high-cost, short-term loans.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    If you’re considering a same-day payday loan, it’s important to understand exactly how these loans work, what they cost, and what to expect from the process. Below are answers to the most common questions borrowers ask before applying.

    What Is a Same-Day Payday Loan?
    A same-day payday loan is a short-term, high-interest loan designed to give borrowers quick access to cash, usually on the same day they apply. These loans are used to cover urgent expenses such as medical bills, car repairs, or unexpected utility payments. The loan amount is usually small (often between $100 and $1,000) and must be repaid in full on your next payday, usually within two to four weeks.

    How Quickly Can I Get the Money?
    If approved, many lenders can deposit funds into your bank account within a few hours or by the end of the business day. However, actual timing depends on when you apply, the lender’s processing speed, and your bank’s deposit policies. Some lenders offer instant funding or same-day direct deposit if applications are submitted early in the day, while others may require overnight processing.

    Do I Need Good Credit to Get a Same-Day Payday Loan?
    No, same-day payday loans are generally accessible to borrowers with poor credit or no credit history at all. Most lenders don’t perform hard credit checks and instead focus on your income, employment status, and ability to repay the loan. Proof of a steady income, a valid ID, and an active checking account are typically the main requirements for approval.

    What Are the Costs Associated With Same-Day Payday Loans?
    Same-day payday loans can be very expensive. While the fees may seem modest upfront, the annual percentage rates (APRs) can reach 300% or more. For example, a $300 loan with a $45 fee for two weeks equates to a 391% APR. Failing to repay the loan on time can lead to additional fees, interest, and in some cases, collection activity. Always review the full cost of borrowing before committing.

    Can I Extend or Roll Over My Payday Loan If I Can’t Repay It on Time?
    Some lenders may offer extensions or rollovers, which allow you to delay repayment by paying an additional fee. However, this often leads to a cycle of debt, as the interest continues to accrue. Rolling over a loan once or multiple times can double or even triple your repayment obligation. If you’re struggling to repay, it’s best to contact the lender early and explore options, or seek help from a nonprofit credit counselor to avoid escalating costs.

    Editorial Note
    This article is provided solely for informational and entertainment purposes. Nothing within should be interpreted as legal, financial, or professional advice. Readers should carry out their own research before participating in payday loans.

    Affiliate Transparency
    This article may include affiliate links. If you click on a link and make a purchase or register, a commission may be earned, at no extra cost to you.

    Syndication and Liability Disclaimer
    Any third-party publishers, media platforms, or syndication partners that republish this content do so understanding that it’s meant for informational purposes only. These entities aren’t responsible for the legality, relevance, or interpretation of the material.

    Contact

    • Company: MoneyMutual
    • Address: 2510 E. Sunset Rd. Ste 6, #85 Las Vegas NV, 89120
    • Email: customerservice@moneymutual.com
    • Phone Support: 844-276-2063

    Attachment

    The MIL Network –

  • MIL-OSI USA: AG Labrador Defends Trump Policy Upholding Biological Truth and Protecting Women

    Source: US State of Idaho

    Home Newsroom AG Labrador Defends Trump Policy Upholding Biological Truth and Protecting Women

    BOISE — Attorney General Raúl Labrador led a 26-state coalition, along with Indiana, in filing an amicus brief in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit supporting the federal government’s appeal in Doe v. Bondi. The appeal challenges a lower court’s preliminary injunction against a Trump Administration policy that protects the dignity, safety, and privacy of female inmates by requiring federal prison housing assignments based on biological sex. The policy also prohibits the use of taxpayer funds for sex-change procedures in federal prisons.
    “Truth matters—and it’s under attack in our culture today,” said Attorney General Labrador. “We’re standing up for biological reality, lawful executive authority, and the dignity and safety of women. If government policy or court rulings deny basic truth, it threatens both public trust and the rights of individuals.”
    In January 2025, President Trump signed Executive Order 14168, Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government. Among its provisions, the Order directed the Bureau of Prisons to house inmates according to their biological sex. It also prohibited federal funding for sex reassignment surgeries and related procedures in prisons and immigration detention centers.
    Shortly after the policy was issued, a lawsuit was filed in federal court seeking to block the housing provisions and the restriction on taxpayer-funded procedures. The plaintiffs aim to compel federal prison officials to place biologically male inmates in female correctional facilities and to provide sex-change operations at public expense.
    In response, Idaho is leading a multistate amicus brief urging the D.C. Circuit to defer to the Executive Order that directs federal prisons to house inmates according to their biological sex and bars federal funding for sex-change drugs and surgeries. The States argue that prison officials must be free to manage housing and medical decisions because they alone have the expertise to balance competing safety, privacy, and medical risks in a dangerous prison environment, and because placing biological males in women’s units jeopardizes female inmates’ privacy, safety, and dignity. 
    The case, Doe v. Bondi, is currently pending before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. Idaho’s brief supports the federal government’s appeal and the Administration’s authority to enforce policies that prioritize safety and biological reality in federal custody.
    Read the amicus brief here.
    Read more from the Daily Wire here.

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Wyoming Guard hosts Tunisian NCO development exchange to strengthen military partnership

    Source: US State of Wyoming

    Wyoming National Guard

    By Staff Sgt. Cesar Rivas

    CHEYENNE, Wyo. – The Wyoming National Guard hosted a delegation from the Tunisian Armed Forces for a weeklong noncommissioned officer (NCO) development exchange, strengthening a long-standing partnership through the State Partnership Program.

    Staff Sgt. Eric Wenner, a civil affairs senior sergeant currently assigned to U.S. Africa Command’s Office of Security Cooperation Tunisia, said the visit aimed to showcase the U.S. Army’s approach to empowering NCOs and building leadership capacity at every level.

    “Although the Tunisian military is a robust force by African standards, we still like to show them how the U.S. Army uses its NCO Corps to grow and strengthen their force,” Wenner said. “It’s about giving them tools to develop their own NCOs and increase overall capability in a way that mirrors what we’ve done in the U.S.”

    One of the key challenges for Tunisia’s military, Wenner noted, is a lack of funding and access to modern facilities. The exchange provides an opportunity for Tunisian leaders to observe U.S. processes and infrastructure, sparking ideas on how to improve efficiency with limited resources.

    “This visit is about giving them better ideas on how to maximize what they have,” Wenner explained. “Through the State Partnership Program, they can see firsthand how we organize and train and adapt those lessons back home.”

    The visit included tours of Wyoming National Guard facilities, NCO-led workshops, and opportunities for Tunisian soldiers to engage directly with their American counterparts. The focus was not only on military tactics but also on leadership philosophy, mentorship, and the role of the NCO in mission success.

    From a civil affairs perspective, Wenner emphasized the importance of NCO empowerment and independent decision-making. In civil affairs teams, where small team sizes require flexibility, enlisted Soldiers are often expected to take on responsibilities typically reserved for officers.

    “We’d like to share that same concept with Tunisia—training their enlisted soldiers to operate independently without always needing direct orders,” he said. “This creates a more capable and ready force while reducing the need for constant oversight.”

    Wenner highlighted that Tunisia’s armed forces have been making steady progress in professionalizing their NCO Corps, but exchanges like these provide practical examples and firsthand experiences that can’t be replicated through briefings alone.

    “Being here, seeing how we do things, asking questions face-to-face—that makes a huge difference,” he said. “It’s about more than showing equipment or processes; it’s about building trust, sharing lessons learned, and growing together.”

    Beyond the tactical and operational lessons, the exchange also serves a larger purpose of fostering military-to-military and civil-military relationships. Wenner said civil affairs focuses heavily on integration, partnership, and sharing lessons learned.

    “The goal here is to grow the partnership and strengthen our relationship through a better understanding of each military’s capabilities,” Wenner said. “It’s about progressing together in an efficient and cooperative manner.”

    The Wyoming National Guard and the Tunisian Armed Forces have been partners through the National Guard Bureau’s State Partnership Program (SPP) since 2004. The SPP connects U.S. states with foreign military partners to build long-term relationships, enhance regional security, and promote shared values.

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Senators Coons, Barrasso introduce bipartisan bill to expand access to mental health services for seniors

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Delaware Christopher Coons
    WASHINGTON – U.S. Senators Chris Coons (D-Del.) and John Barrasso (R-Wyo.) introduced the Expanding Seniors Access to Mental Health Services Act. The bill would improve Medicare beneficiaries’ access to licensed clinical social workers. By providing these mental health professionals with the opportunity to participate in the Medicare program when delivering services in skilled nursing facilities, this bill expands the number of mental health providers available to Delaware’s seniors.  
    “Increasing access to clinical social workers improves seniors’ mental health and gives them hope no matter where they live,” said Senator Coons. “Unfortunately, outdated Medicare rules prevent too many older Americans from receiving support from social workers in skilled nursing facilities. The bipartisan Expanding Seniors Access to Mental Health Services Act fixes these rules and expands Medicare coverage to allow social workers to provide the best care to seniors when they need it most.”
    “As a doctor, I know how vital it is for seniors to have access to mental health services,” said Senator Barrasso. “In particular, for those living in rural communities, finding a mental health provider is challenging. This is why I am proud to support bipartisan solutions that help more patients get the care they need.”
    “On behalf of the National Association of Social Workers?–?Delaware Chapter, we thank Senator?Chris?Coons for championing the bipartisan Expanding Seniors Access to Mental Health Services Act,” said Molly?J.?Arbogast, Executive Director of NASW Delaware. “Delaware’s social workers are eager to meet our neighbors where they are, whether that is in a skilled-nursing facility, a community clinic, or their own living rooms, but outdated Medicare rules keep too many people waiting. This bill cuts red tape, recognizes the full value of clinical social work, and gives older adults and people with disabilities quicker access to the evidence-based care they deserve.”
    “We strongly support the Expanding Seniors Access to Mental Health Services Act and applaud Senators Coons and Barrasso for prioritizing nursing home residents’ mental health through expanded Medicare coverage of these essential services in long term and post-acute care settings. This bill also helps short-term patients at skilled nursing facilities maintain trusted relationships with their preferred clinical social workers—promoting continuity of care as well as safer, more successful transitions back to the community. Enabling seniors to access these services is a vital step in addressing the growing mental and behavioral health needs of older adults,” said Cheryl Heiks, Executive Director of Delaware Health Care Facilities Association.
    “On behalf of the National Association of Social Workers—Wyoming Chapter, we extend our heartfelt thanks to Senator John Barrasso for his leadership on the bipartisan Expanding Seniors Access to Mental Health Services Act,” said Nathan Stahley, Executive Director of NASW Wyoming. “Modernizing outdated Medicare regulations is essential to expanding access to mental health services for individuals in Wyoming and across the country. This vital legislation cuts through unnecessary red tape, elevates the role of clinical social workers, and ensures that older adults and people with disabilities can receive the timely, evidence-based care they need and deserve.”
    “The National Association of Social Workers (NASW) applauds Senators John Barrasso and Chris Coons for introducing the bipartisan Expanding Seniors Access to Mental Health Services Act. Passage of this legislation is critical to the health and well-being of Medicare beneficiaries, for our nation and the social work profession,” said NASW CEO Anthony Estreet, PhD, MBA, LCSW-C. “It will help Medicare beneficiaries access desperately needed, high-quality mental health services clinical social workers are authorized to perform under state law, and it will remove a significant barrier to mental health care provided by independent clinical social workers to older adults and people with disabilities in skilled nursing facilities.”
    The Expanding Seniors Access to Mental Health Services Act ensures clinical social workers can provide psychosocial services to patients in nursing homes, and the full range of Health and Behavior Assessment and Intervention (HBAI) services within their scope of practice.
    The text of the bill is available here.

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Ernst on Revitalizing Manufacturing in the Heartland

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Joni Ernst (R-IA)
    WASHINGTON – Today, Chair Joni Ernst (R-Iowa) welcomed Small Business Administration (SBA) Administrator Kelly Loeffler to a U.S. Senate Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship hearing to continue their “Made in America” initiative fueling the great American manufacturing comeback.
    Watch Chair Ernst’s remarks here.
    Ernst’s full remarks:
    “We are here today to discuss how the Small Business Administration (SBA) can expand and support investment in our nation’s small manufacturers.
    “Last week, the Committee examined how the Small Business Investment Company (SBIC) program could help channel more private capital into American manufacturing.
    “To better understand the urgency of this situation, we need to take a closer look at the numbers. And let me tell you folks, this is staggering. 
    “Over the past 40 years, we did not simply lose manufacturing jobs. We witnessed the steady erosion of our industrial sector to China’s delight and advantage. 
    “Over the last 25 years in Iowa alone, we have lost nearly one in six manufacturing jobs. American manufacturing employment has fared even worse over the last forty years, falling by 28 percent and reaching depths we haven’t seen since 1946.
    “Only 3.7 percent of Americans are employed in manufacturing today – half the share we had forty years ago, and barely a third of our peak in the late ‘60s.
    “To put that in perspective, there are nearly twice as many people working in state and local governments than on the factory floor.
    “This is not simply an economic decline – it is a hollowing out.
    “The steady loss of skills, infrastructure, and investment in manufacturing undermines our ability to innovate and scale new technologies, leaving our homeland weakened and vulnerable.
    “The reason for this is not a mystery: government policies that encouraged offshoring production without regard for the long-term damage done to our domestic productive capacity.
    “Today, the consequences are visible in every corner of America.
    “Shuttered plants, decaying factories, and empty parking lots stand as monuments to the multi-generational disintegration of hard-earned knowledge, talent, and tradition that once formed the bedrock of our nation.    
    “But here is the good news: we have a President and SBA Administrator who understand what is at stake.
    “They recognize the size and complexity of the work needed to revitalize American manufacturing and are committed to rebuilding our industrial strength, from the ground up.
    “As we discussed during last week’s hearing, the SBIC program will continue to play its vital role in expanding our productive capacity by facilitating private investment and through federal partnerships like that between the SBA and the Department of Defense’s newly established Office of Strategic Capital – something I championed in the annual defense bill.
    “But that is only the beginning; we must do more.
    “Today, we welcome Administrator Loeffler to discuss the SBA’s ‘Made in America Manufacturing Initiative’ and the efforts underway to support the small businesses that make up 98 percent of our nation’s manufacturing base.
    “Part of that effort involves the Made in America Manufacturing Finance Act, which I was proud to introduce last month alongside Senator Coons.
    “This bipartisan legislation would double the SBA-backed loan limit from $5 million to $10 million for small manufacturers who need that capital to modernize, grow, and train the next generation of American workers.
    “That investment will have a meaningful impact across the entire supply chain. Because the smallest startups to the largest firms all rely on small manufacturers to get the job done.  
    “Revitalizing our industrial base and reclaiming our ability to make things in America starts with small businesses. We must ensure that cutting edge innovation and high-speed, high-quality production happens right here, at home – not overseas. 
    “If we are serious about competing with and beating China, creating good-paying jobs, and restoring economic resilience, we must empower our small manufacturers to lead the way.
    “This bipartisan legislation takes a bold step in that direction. 
    “I am grateful that we’re joined today by Administrator Loeffler, and I look forward to hearing from her how Congress can better equip the SBA to invest in the industrial revitalization of America.”

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Ernst Keeps Up Pressure for Sioux City Airfield Upgrades

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Joni Ernst (R-IA)
    WASHINGTON – During a Senate Committee on Armed Services hearing, U.S. Senator Joni Ernst (R-Iowa), secured a key commitment from the Chief of Staff of the U.S. Air Force, General David Allvin, to upgrade the runway used by the Iowa National Guard’s 185th Air Refueling Wing in Sioux City.
    Ernst, who served in the Iowa National Guard, pointed out the critical role the unit plays in defending the homeland and the Air Force’s previous commitments to it. Following her questioning, Allvin noted that design work progress is removing obstacles to be able to finish the runway upgrades.
    Click here for her full line of questioning.
    “Let me talk to you about Sioux City, those units there, and how proud we are of those units that have occupied this airfield,” Ernst said.
    She reminded the committee that the airfield is named after Colonel Bud Day, a Sioux City native who was awarded the Medal of Honor and Air Force Cross.
    Background:
    Ernst is dedicated to supporting servicemembers and their families in Iowa. For years, she has pushed the Air Force to honor its promises to Siouxlanders. Earlier this month, Ernst reaffirmed her resolve to continue fighting.

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI: Trio completes acquisition of cash flow positive oil and gas assets in prolific heavy oil region of Saskatchewan Canada

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Bakersfield, CA, May 21, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Trio Petroleum Corp (NYSE American: TPET) (“Trio” or the “Company”), a California-based oil and gas company, today is pleased to announce that it has closed on the balance of certain petroleum and natural gas properties held by Novacor Exploration Ltd. (“Novacor”). More specifically, TPET closed on the remaining Novacor TWP47 assets, located at the South-West quarter of Section 19, Township 47, Range 26W3M. These assets are in the prolific Lloydminster, Saskatchewan heavy oil region (the “Acquisition”). This acquisition strategically positions the Company to expand its operations into one of North America’s most promising heavy oil basins, with upside potential for long term production and reserve growth. Since the Novacor assets are in the heavy oil area, Trio believes they offer economic development and low operational costs. Trio also believes that the market accessibility combined with a favorable regulatory process makes this area very attractive for continued and future development within these lands.

    As reported in the Company’s press release on April 10, 2025, the Novacor assets are located at the South-West quarter of Section 19, Township 47, Range 26W3M and the Northeast Section 3, Township 48, Range 24W3M, both in the Lloydminster, Saskatchewan area. There are currently seven producing wells located on the two properties. Production from the wells in Section 19 is subject to Freehold Royalties of 13.5% and a GORR of 2%, and production from the wells in Section 3 is subject to Freehold Royalties of 15%. The wells produce heavy crude oil from the McLaren/Sparky and Lloydminster formation(s). Novacor is the operator of these cash flow positive wells and has the capability to rapidly double production. The area is home to some of the largest players in the industry such as Cenovus Energy, Canadian Natural Resources, Baytex Energy, Rife Resources and many others who have made Heavy Oil a staple of their operation, and where numerous opportunities to acquire additional highly economic fields exist.

    Important in this acquisition is Novacor’s ability to address recent fluctuations in global oil prices and their limited impact on the company’s operations. Novacor will continue as operator of the assets. While market volatility is inherent in the energy sector, the Company believes that Novacor’s strategic focus on operational efficiency and low lift costs provides a significant buffer against downward price pressures.

    Novacor’s current lift cost stands at a competitive CDN $10.00 per barrel. Trio believes that this low operational expenditure will help ensure Trio maintains strong profitability even in a lower oil price environment. Trio also believes that its commitment to cost management and efficient production techniques will allow it to navigate market fluctuations with greater resilience compared to companies with higher operating costs, thus providing Trio with a significant advantage in its ability to produce oil economically in the current market.

    Novacor has a long history of oil and gas development in the area. Trio’s plan is to aggressively grow its footprint in the area utilizing Novacor as an operator of the assets. The Company will continue to seek opportunities for strategic growth and optimization with Novacor’s operational efficiencies and its plan is to deliver consistent value to shareholders through a disciplined approach to operations and cost management.”

    Mr. Ross, Trio’s CEO stated, “Our immediate plan is to initiate our workover program to increase production on these newly acquired assets and we believe our next couple of quarters should reflect the benefit of our work. Our focus remains on acquiring projects that generate immediate cash flow or offer transformative growth potential with strategic investment. We believe that this approach aligns with our long-term vision of creating exponential value while managing risk and resources effectively.”

    Terms of the Acquisition

    The stated purchase price of the Acquisition was US$650,000 in cash paid in two tranches, and 526,536 in shares of common stock of Trio, which were registered for resale in a registration statement which Trio expects to be declared effective by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission in the near future. The Company paid Novacor a good faith deposit of $65,000, which was applied to the cash portion of the purchase price at the initial closing.

    About Trio Petroleum Corp

    Trio Petroleum Corp is an oil and gas exploration and development company in California, Utah and Lloydminster, Saskatchewan.

    Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

    All statements in this press release of Trio Petroleum Corp (“Trio”) and its representatives and partners that are not based on historical fact are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and the provisions of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Acts”). In particular, when used in the preceding discussion, the words “estimates,” “believes,” “hopes,” “expects,” “intends,” “on-track”, “plans,” “anticipates,” or “may,” and similar conditional expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Acts and are subject to the safe harbor created by the Acts. Any statements made in this news release other than those of historical fact, about an action, event or development, are forward-looking statements. While management has based any forward-looking statements contained herein on its current expectations, the information on which such expectations were based may change. These forward-looking statements rely on a number of assumptions concerning future events and are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties, and other factors, many of which are outside of the Trio’s control, that could cause actual results to materially and adversely differ from such statements. Such risks, uncertainties, and other factors include, but are not necessarily limited to, those set forth in the Risk Factors sections of the Trio reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Copies of such documents are available on the SEC’s website, www.sec.gov. Trio undertakes no obligation to update these statements for revisions or changes after the date of this release, except as required by law.

    Investor Relations Contact:
    Redwood Empire Financial Communications
    Michael Bayes
    (404) 809 4172
    michael@redwoodefc.com 

    The MIL Network –

  • MIL-OSI United Nations: 21 May 2025 Note for Media Seventy-eighth World Health Assembly – Daily update: 21 May 2025

    Source: World Health Organisation

    A “health financing emergency” must drive country-led, data-driven solutions

    Ministers from multiple countries hit by the abrupt cuts in external funding for health agreed on the urgent need for country-owned and implemented strategies – and a laser-sharp focus on health data – at a ministerial dialogue co-hosted by WHO and the Susan Thompson Buffett Foundation at the Seventy-eighth World Health Assembly.

    Opening remarks by Professor Senait Fisseha, Vice President of Global Programs at the Susan Thompson Buffett Foundation, and Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, WHO Director-General, set the tone by noting that the crisis presents an opportunity for a turnaround in how health financing policies and health data systems are built and operated.

    Specifically, this is a time for countries to reduce their reliance on external health information systems and external financing; build out their domestic data infrastructure, from vital statistics to downstream impact and return-on-investment; and establish resilient systems designed to withstand shocks, so that access to essential services is protected.

    Professor Fisseha called on countries “to use this moment to rethink data and financing in a way that best meets your needs and the needs of your people […] For countries to truly lead and for funders and development partners to start to learn how to follow. Data and financing are a natural place to start because that is where ministers are telling us to start.”

    Dr Tedros said, “From expanding domestic financing to pioneering real-time data systems, many of you are advancing solutions that are scalable, sustainable and rooted in equity. Data and sustainable financing are not just technical matters. They are political choices. They shape who is reached, how quickly, and with what quality of care. And they determine whether we progress or fall behind.”

    Ministers from Barbados, Central African Republic, Egypt, Liberia, Malawi, Rwanda and Sierra Leone, and representatives from the African Union and the World Bank, among others, shared experiences and advice on concrete actions to strengthen data systems, health financing and planning – urging intensified collaboration in the future. They also spoke of the need to leverage the digital transformation and thereby increase transparency and accountability.

    Also discussed: strategies to improve domestic financing capacity while maximizing impact include: strengthening tax administration; exploring revenue sources such as taxes on such items as food, alcohol and tobacco; setting up population-wide mandatory health coverage schemes, coupled with subsidies for low-income households and vulnerable population groups; promoting strategic purchasing of health supplies; prioritizing health in public spending; and integrating externally-funded programmes into domestic financing systems and priorities. 

    Later this week the Assembly will take up the proposed WHA Health Financing Resolution. 

    Related links

    WHO Director-General’s opening remarks at the Strategic Roundtable: Data and Sustainable Financing: Twin Foundations to Accelerate UHC – 21 May 2025

    Report on the health conditions in the occupied Palestinian territory, including east Jerusalem, and in the occupied Syrian Golan

    On 21 May 2025, the Seventy-eighth World Health Assembly noted a report from the Director-General, outlining WHO’s humanitarian and emergency health response in the occupied Palestinian territory, including east Jerusalem, and in the occupied Syrian Golan, from January 2024 to February 2025.

    A report on the health conditions in the occupied Syrian Golan couldn’t be provided this year again due to the ongoing situation and the lack of disaggregated health data on the Syrian population. Member States were invited to provide guidance on how to support WHO and partners to restore essential health services across Syria and enable a WHO field-assessment mission to the occupied Syrian Golan.   

    Member States expressed grave concerns over the deterioration of the health system in Gaza, including forced displacement, overcrowding and deteriorating sanitation, and attacks on health, stressing the need for concerted action to address the dire health needs.

    A number of Member States presented draft decisions asking the Director-General to continue reporting on the health conditions in the occupied Palestinian territory, including east Jerusalem, and in the occupied Syrian Golan, and more specifically on food insecurity and malnutrition in the Gaza Strip, and to continue supporting the Palestinian and Syrian health systems. The decision was adopted.

    Related documents

    A78/16: Health conditions in the occupied Palestinian territory, including east Jerusalem, and in the occupied Syrian Golan

    A78/B/CONF./1: Health conditions in the occupied Palestinian territory, including east Jerusalem, and in the occupied Syrian Golan

    A78/B/CONF./1 Add.1: Financial and administrative implications for the Secretariat of decisions proposed for adoption by the Health Assembly

    MIL OSI United Nations News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: “We will never let that happen again” — Wyoming honors its veterans across the state 

    Source: US State of Wyoming

    Wyoming National Guard 

    By Joseph Coslett Jr. 

     CHEYENNE, Wyo. – On May 10, 2025, the State of Wyoming paid tribute to its Veterans in a series of ceremonies as part of the annual Veterans Welcome Home Day.  

    Gov. Mark Gordon, U.S. Senator John Barrasso and U.S. Representative Harriet Hageman joined leaders from the Wyoming Military Department and the Wyoming Veterans Commission, traveled across the state to thank those who served—especially Veterans from the Korean and Vietnam Wars who were never properly welcomed home. 

    The daylong journey began at sunrise in Cheyenne and included four official ceremonies in Afton, Riverton, Sheridan and concluded in Wheatland. At each stop, the Governor, First Lady Jennie Gordon, Maj. Gen. Greg Porter, Adjutant General of Wyoming, and other dignitaries met with Veterans and their families, delivering remarks and expressing gratitude for their service. 

    Speaking to a room filled with Veterans and their loved ones, Porter reflected on the significance of the moment by connecting it to the broader legacy of American service. He reminded attendees that just weeks earlier, on April 19, the nation had observed the 250th anniversary of the “shot heard ‘round the world” at Lexington and Concord—an event that began a long lineage of Americans willing to fight for freedom. 

    “Over that time, America’s done a pretty good job of bringing its [servicemembers] home—with two exceptions: the Korean War and the Vietnam War,” Porter said. “Our Vietnam Veterans faced a far different return. They probably wished for an apathetic return. They faced derision, sarcasm, and hate in some cases—certainly disrespect. The purpose of these Welcome Home ceremonies is to take a moment to pause and recommit that we will never let that happen again as a nation.” 

    Gordon echoed that message, “This day is about saying, ‘Thank you for your service—welcome home.’ That gratitude extends to the families, too. Our Veterans carry a legacy that began with citizens who marched barefoot through snow because they believed in what this country stood for. In the military, we never leave anyone behind. As a nation, we should never leave a Veteran behind.” 

    As part of the ceremony, the official proclamation was read declaring March 30, 2025, as Wyoming Veterans Welcome Home Day, recognizing the moment in history when U.S. troops completed their withdrawal from Vietnam in 1973. The proclamation recounts how many Veterans returned to a country divided by politics and conflict, and how they were met not with honor—but with silence, scorn or worse. 

    “Members of the United States armed forces who served bravely and faithfully for the United States were caught in the crossfire of public debate about the involvement of the United States in the Vietnam War, and many were met with such disrespect that military leaders recommended Soldiers not wear their military uniforms as they returned home.”

    The proclamation goes on to honor all Veterans, particularly those from the Korean and Vietnam Wars, and urges citizens to recognize their service “not just today but every day.” 

    After the speeches concluded, Governor Gordon took time to greet each Veteran in attendance, shaking hands and presenting a personalized challenge coin as a token of thanks.  

    Also present were Wyoming Veterans Commission Chairman Command Sgt. Maj. (Ret.) Ken Persson, Sr., and Director Col. (Ret.) Tim Sheppard, both of whom played key roles in organizing the day’s events and honoring those who once returned home without recognition. 

    As the day came to a close, the message that echoed from community to community was simple but profound: Wyoming remembers. Wyoming is grateful. And Wyoming will never forget. 

    For more information on Veterans Welcome Home Day or to learn about available resources for Veterans, contact the Wyoming Veterans Commission at (307) 777-8152. 

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Man sought by Gisborne Police arrested

    Source: New Zealand Police

    Police have located a 36-year-old man who is alleged to have escaped Police custody at a rural Gisborne property yesterday.

    The man was observed returning home shortly after 11pm and was arrested without incident, said Inspector Soni Malaulau, Tairāwhiti Police.

    “He was cold but otherwise unharmed.”

    Enquiries are continuing and Police are considering charges.

    ENDS

    Issued by the Police Media Centre

    MIL OSI New Zealand News –