NewzIntel.com

    • Checkout Page
    • Contact Us
    • Default Redirect Page
    • Frontpage
    • Home-2
    • Home-3
    • Lost Password
    • Member Login
    • Member LogOut
    • Member TOS Page
    • My Account
    • NewzIntel Alert Control-Panel
    • NewzIntel Latest Reports
    • Post Views Counter
    • Privacy Policy
    • Public Individual Page
    • Register
    • Subscription Plan
    • Thank You Page

Category: housing

  • MIL-OSI Security: Ferguson Man Sentenced to 93 Months in Prison for Drug Sales

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    ST. LOUIS – U.S. District Judge Matthew T. Schelp on Tuesday sentenced a man from Ferguson, Missouri who sold fentanyl and methamphetamine to undercover St. Louis County police officers to 93 months in prison.

    Theodise Reece, 37, has been in custody since his arrest on Aug. 30, 2023, bringing the total he will serve for the crime to about nine years.

    After receiving several tips in June of 2023 that Reece was selling illegal drugs, the St. Louis County Police Department set up a series of undercover purchases of drugs, Reece’s plea agreement says. Reece sold $100 worth of fentanyl on June 14, 2023, then $150 worth of methamphetamine six days later, Reece admitted in his guilty plea.

    After making four more undercover purchases and witnessing Reece make another sale, investigators sought a search warrant for Reece’s home. They arrested him during an undercover buy on Aug. 30, 2023, and found a semiautomatic pistol in his car loaded with one chambered round and 18 more in an extended magazine. Inside a satchel slung across his chest, police found nearly 40 grams of fentanyl and 225 grams of meth as well as ecstasy, cocaine base and marijuana. Reece admitted that he sold drugs for a living. Investigators found an AR-style rifle in Reece’s home.

    Reece pleaded guilty in November to three felonies: distribution of fentanyl, possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine and possession of one or more firearms in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime.

    The St. Louis County Police Department Bureau of Drug Enforcement investigated the case. Assistant U.S. Attorney Nino Przulj prosecuted the case.

    This case is part of Project Safe Neighborhoods (PSN), a program bringing together all levels of law enforcement and the communities they serve to reduce violent crime and gun violence, and to make our neighborhoods safer for everyone. On May 26, 2021, the Department launched a violent crime reduction strategy strengthening PSN based on these core principles: fostering trust and legitimacy in our communities, supporting community-based organizations that help prevent violence from occurring in the first place, setting focused and strategic enforcement priorities, and measuring the results.

    MIL Security OSI –

    April 2, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Video: Secretary Rubio meets with Argentine Foreign Minister Gerardo Werthein

    Source: United States of America – Department of State (video statements)

    Secretary of State Marco A. Rubio meets with Argentina Foreign Minister Gerardo Werthein at the Department of State, on April 1, 2025.

    ———-
    Under the leadership of the President and Secretary of State, the U.S. Department of State leads America’s foreign policy through diplomacy, advocacy, and assistance by advancing the interests of the American people, their safety and economic prosperity. On behalf of the American people we promote and demonstrate democratic values and advance a free, peaceful, and prosperous world.

    The Secretary of State, appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate, is the President’s chief foreign affairs adviser. The Secretary carries out the President’s foreign policies through the State Department, which includes the Foreign Service, Civil Service and U.S. Agency for International Development.

    Get updates from the U.S. Department of State at www.state.gov and on social media!
    Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/statedept
    X: https://x.com/StateDept
    Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/statedept
    Flickr: https://flickr.com/photos/statephotos/

    Subscribe to the State Department Blog: https://www.state.gov/blogs
    Watch on-demand State Department videos: https://video.state.gov/
    Subscribe to The Week at State e-newsletter: http://ow.ly/diiN30ro7Cw

    State Department website: https://www.state.gov/
    Careers website: https://careers.state.gov/
    White House website: https://www.whitehouse.gov/
    Terms of Use: https://state.gov/tou

    #StateDepartment #DepartmentofState #Diplomacy

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gyLkouTBbbY

    MIL OSI Video –

    April 2, 2025
  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Responsibility for all fire functions moves to MHCLG

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    News story

    Responsibility for all fire functions moves to MHCLG

    Greater clarity and accountability will be brought to fire and building safety from the transfer of Ministerial responsibility from the Home Office to MHCLG

    Greater clarity and accountability will be brought to fire and building safety from today (1 April) thanks to the transfer of Ministerial responsibility for all fire functions from the Home Office to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government. 

    Bringing these responsibilities together will strengthen coordination, improve policy implementation, and reinforce the government’s commitment to making homes, buildings and communities safer.  

    The change delivers on a key recommendation from the Grenfell Tower Inquiry’s Phase 2 report, which advised that fire and building safety should be overseen by a single department.  

    The Minister for Building Safety and Local Growth who will be taking on responsibility for fire functions Alex Norris said:  

    “Ensuring the safety of people in their homes and communities is a top priority for this government. By bringing all fire and building safety responsibilities under one department, we are reinforcing accountability, improving coordination, and taking decisive action to protect lives.  

    “I would like to thank Dame Diana Johnson for her work in this important area. I look forward to working with fire and rescue services and key stakeholders to implement the Grenfell Tower Inquiry’s recommendations and drive forward the reforms needed to keep people safe. 

    “This is a significant step in delivering meaningful change, making our buildings safer, and strengthening our country’s resilience for the future.” 

    Policing Minister Dame Diana Johnson said:

    “It has been an honour and privilege to serve as Minister for Fire.

    “I would like to express my utmost gratitude to the brave firefighters in our fire and rescue services, who selflessly dedicate themselves to protecting the public from fire every day.

    “I would also like to thank the government officials and stakeholders from across the sector I have worked with over the past nine months. Their drive to make the sector stronger has been invaluable and I am certain my good friend Alex Norris will also benefit from their advice.”

    Following the publication of the Grenfell Tower Inquiry’s Phase 2 report on 4 September 2024, the Prime Minister acknowledged the failings that led to the tragedy and reaffirmed the government’s commitment to implementing the necessary reforms. This transfer of Ministerial responsibility for all fire functions to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government represents an important part of this work, and the government will continue to drive forward the necessary reforms to make sure a tragedy like Grenfell can never happen again. 

    Notes to editors: 

    • The Home Office will retain management of the Airwave Service Contract on behalf of the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government and will continue to oversee the Emergency Services Mobile Communications Programme and His Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue Services (HMICFRS).

    Share this page

    The following links open in a new tab

    • Share on Facebook (opens in new tab)
    • Share on Twitter (opens in new tab)

    Updates to this page

    Published 1 April 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom –

    April 2, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Video: How to make Europe ‘s regions stronger? The Modernised Cohesion Policy

    Source: European Commission (video statements)

    The Modernised Cohesion Policy aligns investments with EU strategic priorities to build stronger, more competitive, and more resilient regions for a united Europe.
    It empowers Europe’s regions with increased and flexible financing to boost research and innovation, defence and security, especially in eastern border regions, and drive the energy transition, affordable housing, and water resilience.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jqidF5uGsOs

    MIL OSI Video –

    April 2, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: WA co-leads multistate suit against HHS, Sec. Kennedy to overturn cuts to public health grants

    Source: Washington State News

    OLYMPIA — Attorney General Nick Brown today joined a coalition of 24 states in filing a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., for abruptly and illegally terminating $11 billion in critical public health grants to the states.

    The grant terminations, which came with no warning or legally valid explanation, have quickly caused chaos for state health agencies that rely on these critical funds for a wide range of urgent public health needs such as infectious disease management, fortifying emergency preparedness, providing mental health and substance abuse services, and modernizing public health infrastructure.

    “We can’t make America healthy by spreading preventable diseases,” Brown said. “Aside from the illegality of these actions, the administration is also choosing to neglect the biggest public health challenges, including substance abuse and mental health crises, facing our communities.”

    Washington stands to lose more than $159 million from these cancellations by HHS. If the funding is not restored, important state public health programs and initiatives will have to be dissolved or disbanded. Washington’s Department of Health has already had to cancel its Care-A-Van mobile health clinics that provide health care, including vaccinations and health education, to historically underserved communities. The program prioritizes rural areas, BIPOC communities, immigrants and refugees, unhoused populations, children and schools, and other vulnerable populations.

    These federal awards terminations also threaten Washington’s Health Care Authority’s network of regional Behavioral Health Administrative Service Organizations, which provide behavioral health services to low-income non-Medicaid individuals with serious mental illnesses and substance use disorders, populations disproportionately impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic.

    The HHS cuts threaten the urgent public health needs of states around the country at a time when emerging disease threats—such as measles and bird flu—are on the rise, Brown warned.

    Congress authorized and appropriated new and increased funding for these grants in COVID-19-related legislation to support critical public health needs. Many of these grants are from specific programs created by Congress, such as block grants to states for mental health and substance abuse and addiction services. Yet, with no legal authority or explanation, Secretary Kennedy’s HHS agencies on March 24 arbitrarily terminated these grants “for cause” effective immediately, claiming that the pandemic is over and the grants are no longer necessary.

    In their lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court in Rhode Island, the coalition of states assert that the mass terminations violate federal law because the end of the pandemic is not a “for cause” basis for ending the grants, especially since none of the appropriated funds are tied to the end of the pandemic. HHS’ position, up until a few days ago, was that the end of the pandemic did not affect the availability of these grant funds. HHS has not pointed to any failure on the part of the states in complying with their agreements with HHS that would warrant the federal government’s unlawful terminations.

    With this lawsuit, the coalition is seeking a temporary restraining order to invalidate HHS’s and Secretary Kennedy’s mass grant terminations in the suing states, arguing that the actions violate the Administrative Procedure Act. The states are also asking the court to prevent HHS from maintaining or reinstating the terminations and any agency actions implementing them.

    Attorneys General Brown, Phil Weiser of Colorado, Peter Neronha of Rhode Island, Rob Bonta of California, and Keith Ellison of Minnesota are co-leading the litigation. They are joined by the Attorneys General of Arizona, Connecticut, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Hawai‘i, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, and Wisconsin, as well as the Governors of Kentucky and Pennsylvania.

    The lawsuit can be found here.

    -30-

    Washington’s Attorney General serves the people and the state of Washington. As the state’s largest law firm, the Attorney General’s Office provides legal representation to every state agency, board, and commission in Washington. Additionally, the Office serves the people directly by enforcing consumer protection, civil rights, and environmental protection laws. The Office also prosecutes elder abuse, Medicaid fraud, and handles sexually violent predator cases in 38 of Washington’s 39 counties. Visit www.atg.wa.gov to learn more.

    Media Contact:

    Email: press@atg.wa.gov

    Phone: (360) 753-2727

    General contacts: Click here

    Media Resource Guide & Attorney General’s Office FAQ

    MIL OSI USA News –

    April 2, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Security: FBI Boston Warns Quit Claim Deed Fraud is on the Rise

    Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation FBI Crime News (b)

    Landowners and Real Estate Agents Urged to Take Action to Protect Themselves

    The Boston Division of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) is warning property owners and real estate agents about a steady increase in reports of quit claim deed fraud it has received—scams that have resulted in devastating consequences for unsuspecting owners who had no idea their land was sold, or was in the process of being sold, right out from under them.

    Known as quit claim deed fraud or home title theft, the schemes involve fraudsters who forge documents to record a phony transfer of property ownership. Criminals can then sell either the vacant land or home, take out a mortgage on it, or even rent it out to make a profit, forcing the real owners to head to court to reclaim their property.

    Deed fraud often involves identity theft where criminals will use personal information gleaned from the internet or elsewhere to assume your identity or claim to represent you to steal your property.

    “Folks across the region are having their roots literally pulled out from under them and are being left with no place to call home. They’re suffering deeply personal losses that have inflicted a significant financial and emotional toll, including shock, anger, and even embarrassment,” said Jodi Cohen, special agent in charge of the FBI Boston Division. “We are urging the public to heed this warning and to take proactive steps to avoid losing your property. Anyone who is a victim of this type of fraud should report it to us.”

    Law enforcement and the FBI have been alerted to the fraud at all points in the process and have received reports involving a variety of fraudulent scenarios, including:  

    • Scammers who comb through public records to find vacant parcels of land and properties that don’t have a mortgage or other lien and then impersonate the landowner, asking a real estate agent to list the property. Homeowners whose properties have been listed for sale don’t know it until they’re alerted, sometimes after the sales have gone through.
    • Family members, often the elderly, targeted by their own relatives and close associates who convince them to transfer the property into their name for their own financial gain.
    • Fraudsters known as “title pirates” who use fraudulent or forged deeds and other documents to convey title to a property. Often these scams go undetected until after the money has been wired to the scammer in the fraudulent sale and the sale has been recorded.

    The FBI’s Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3), which provides the public with a means of reporting internet-facilitated crimes, does not have specific statistics solely for quit claim deed fraud, but it does fall into the real estate crime category. Nationwide, from 2019 through 2023, 58,141 victims reported $1.3 billion in losses relating to real estate fraud. Here in the Boston Division—which includes all of Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and Rhode Island—during the same period, 2,301 victims reported losing more than $61.5 million.

    • 262 victims in Maine lost $6,253,008.
    • 1,576 victims in Massachusetts lost $46,269,818.
    • 239 victims in New Hampshire lost $4,144,467.
    • 224 victims in Rhode Island lost $4,852,220.

    The reported losses are most likely much higher due to that fact that many don’t know where to report it, are embarrassed, or haven’t yet realized they have been scammed.

    FBI Boston is working with property owners, realtors, county registers, title companies, and insurance companies to thwart the fraud schemes but it’s no easy task. The COVID-19 pandemic changed the way business was and continues to be conducted. More and more people have grown accustomed to conducting real estate transactions through email and over the phone. The remote nature of these sales is a benefit to bad actors.

    Tips for Landowners:

    • Continually monitor online property records and set up title alerts with the county clerk’s office (if possible).
    • Set up online search alerts for your property.
    • Drive by the property or have a management company periodically check it.
    • Ask your neighbors to notify you if they see anything suspicious.
    • Beware of anyone using encrypted applications to conduct real estate transactions.
    • Take action if you stop receiving your water or property tax bills, or if utility bills on vacant properties suddenly increase.

    The FBI can work with our partners to try to stop wire transfers and recover the funds within the first 72 hours. We urge folks to report fraud and suspected fraud to the FBI’s Internet Crime Complaint Center at www.ic3.gov.

    MIL Security OSI –

    April 2, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Global: William Wordsworth’s last home is up for sale – returning it to a private residence would be a loss for the UK’s cultural heritage

    Source: The Conversation – UK – By Amy Wilcockson, Research assistant, University of Glasgow

    Until recently, fans of William Wordsworth could visit his final home, Rydal Mount and Gardens, nestled in the heart of England’s green and beautiful Lake District. Renowned as one of the most prominent British poets, the works of Wordsworth (1770-1850) include what is widely regarded as the most famous poem in the English language, I Wandered Lonely as a Cloud.

    So it’s not surprising that his immaculately maintained house and gardens, with breathtaking views of Lake Windermere and Rydal Water, once attracted 45,000 visitors a year.

    However, rising costs, a fall in visitor numbers to 20,000 or fewer per year, and the residual effects of the pandemic have placed the future of the museum in question.

    The current owners have put Rydal Mount on the market for the first time since 1969 for £2.5 million – meaning this important piece of literary heritage, depending on who buys it, could become closed to the public.

    The house was bought by Mary Henderson, Wordsworth’s great-great-granddaughter, in 1969 and opened as a writer’s house museum a year later.

    Rydal Mount was originally a small 16th-century cottage. By 1813, there was enough room for Wordsworth, his wife Mary and three surviving children, plus Wordsworth’s sister-in-law Sara and sister Dorothy – author of the Grasmere Journal, which detailed the household’s life.

    Leaving the cramped conditions of the more famous Dove Cottage behind them, it was at Rydal Mount that Wordsworth truly settled, building a “writing hut” and extensively landscaping the grounds to his own design.


    This article is part of our State of the Arts series. These articles tackle the challenges of the arts and heritage industry – and celebrate the wins, too.


    Next to Rydal Mount is Dora’s Field, which also has literary significance. Here, the poet is believed to have planted 1,847 daffodils to mark his daughter Dora’s memory, following her death from tuberculosis aged 42. These daffodils still bloom every spring.

    While living at Rydal Mount, Wordsworth revised his epic “The Prelude” and wrote many other popular poems. This too is the house where he died in 1850. It was only when Mary died in 1859 that the family’s tenancy of the house came to an end.

    Visitors get to step into the house where all this happened and see a wealth of rare objects, including a rare portrait of Dorothy and Wordsworth’s letter to Queen Victoria refusing the job of Poet Laureate (which he later accepted).

    Owning England’s heritage

    Visitors go to literary museums to experience the “spirit of the place”, to “encounter” the author and absorb some of their creativity. One recent visitor to Rydal Mount was so disappointed not to meet Wordsworth personally that they wrote a disparaging review, telling of their confusion that the poet “wasn’t in” and “when [they] asked when he would be home, all [they] got was blank stares.”

    Wordworth is so closely connected to the Lake District that marketing strategies have used him to promote the area since the 1800s. Rydal Mount has had an integral role in maintaining these traditions. The estate agent’s advert is keen to stress the “once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to own a piece of England’s heritage” and the “superb gardens … designed by Wordsworth himself”.

    In selling the museum as it is, there is a real risk that Rydal Mount could become a private home lost to the public eye – much like Greta Hall, the home of Wordsworth’s fellow poet Samuel Taylor Coleridge, which has long been privately owned.

    Prospective closure is not uncommon for smaller museums in 2025. A recent report noted that three in five small museums fear closure because of declining revenue and footfall. 2020 was the 250th anniversary of Wordsworth’s birth and should have been a bumper year of events and tourism for the Lake District. Instead, the pandemic ravaged the celebrations and left tourist attractions in financial peril that many have not recovered from.

    William Wordsworth lived at Rydal Mount for 37 years and died there.
    Wikimedia, CC BY

    Critics will argue that even if Rydal Mount does close, there are still three more Wordsworth homes open to visitors (Dove Cottage, the favourite of tourist guides, Wordsworth House and Garden, and Allan Bank). Even Wordsworth’s old school is a museum.

    The closure of Rydal Mount would inevitably boost these other sites’ visitor numbers – particularly Dove Cottage, which is on the same (albeit long) road as Rydal Mount. And the condition of Wordsworth’s last home could potentially be improved by a private owner with ample funds to upkeep the house.

    However, it is also true that public appreciation of museums remains high, with 89% of adults in a 2024 YouGov survey advocating for their importance to UK culture, and 54% registering disappointment if their local museum were to close.

    While the British Museum has experienced its highest visitor numbers since 2015, more needs to be done to save regional museums and writer’s house museums from closure. The sale of Rydal Mount into private hands may prove a severe loss to literary history, leaving the Lake District much the poorer for it.

    Amy Wilcockson does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    – ref. William Wordsworth’s last home is up for sale – returning it to a private residence would be a loss for the UK’s cultural heritage – https://theconversation.com/william-wordsworths-last-home-is-up-for-sale-returning-it-to-a-private-residence-would-be-a-loss-for-the-uks-cultural-heritage-253561

    MIL OSI – Global Reports –

    April 2, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Global: How controversial nutritionist John Harvey Kellogg pioneered the path to modern plant-based eating

    Source: The Conversation – UK – By Lauren Alex O’Hagan, Research Fellow, School of Languages and Applied Linguistics, The Open University

    MVelishchuk/Shutterstock

    When you hear the name Kellogg, Corn Flakes might be the first thing that comes to mind. But John Harvey Kellogg is famous for more than just breakfast cereals.

    In many respects, this American doctor, nutritionist, inventor and entrepreneur was ahead of his time. Perhaps the first wellness influencer over a century before Gwyneth Paltrow got in on the act, he advocated startlingly similar treatments and practices.

    But Kellogg was also a divisive figure due to his strong support for eugenics and “racial hygiene”. Driven by concerns about what he termed “race degeneracy”, he founded the Race Betterment Foundation in 1914 – a stance that has since blighted his reputation.

    Kellogg believed that food was medicine. Undoubtedly the pioneer of today’s plant-based movement, he may have been impressed by the explosive growth of the global meat substitute market over the past decade.

    As more people seek ethical, sustainable and health-conscious lifestyles, the demand for plant-based products has skyrocketed. In response, major food corporations have re-branded or developed new offerings to meet this shift in consumer preferences.

    What was once a niche market is now mainstream, with 4,965 products launched worldwide between 2019 and 2021. Today, the global meat substitute market is valued at over US$13 billion (£10 billion), and projections suggest it could reach nearly US$88 billion by 2032.




    Read more:
    A fixation on ‘clean eating’ can be harmful – and perfectionists may be at greater risk of taking it too far


    Kellogg’s game-changing invention

    As director of the Battle Creek Sanitarium in Michigan, Kellogg redefined the connection between food, bodies and health. His philosophy of “biologic living” led him to experiment with a diverse range of health treatments. On the practical end, he championed fresh air, bathing and foods containing live bacteria. On the more eccentric side, he explored bizarre methods including yoghurt enemas, vibrating chairs and even genital mutilation.

    Inspired by the Progressive clean-living movement, Kellogg developed the Battle Creek diet system, which promoted vegetarianism as a way to counter the negative effects of meat on digestion and the nervous system.

    With his wife Ella, he set up an experimental kitchen to explore plant-based alternatives to meat. He was convinced that nuts and grains could provide healthier and more sustainable protein sources.

    In 1896, the US Department of Agriculture approached Kellogg with a request to create a plant-based food product that could serve as a safe, nutritious alternative to meat. Kellogg embraced the challenge and created several innovative products. These included Nuttose, made from ground-up nuts and cereal grains; Granose, a solid-wheat based biscuit; and Protose, a blend of wheat gluten, cereal and ground peanuts.

    Recognising their commercial potential, Kellogg launched the Sanitas Nut Food Company in 1899. By 1912, Sanitas was shipping over 65,000kg of its “vegetable meat” annually across the US. The Chicago Tribune boldly declared that Kellogg had solved “the meat problem”.

    The power of ‘shockvertising’

    Sanitas embarked on a major marketing campaign across popular US press outlets. Its advertisements relied on “shockvertising” to stir fear about meat consumption, often including disturbing images of animal suffering to drive home that message.

    One memorable advert, titled “Why Slay to Eat”, showed a chained, bleeding cow kneeling before a man wielding a mallet. Another took aim at readers, calling them “Pigarians” and claiming that eating pork made a man “piggified” with a “hoggish expression”. Others warned that unsanitary slaughterhouses and food contamination made meat toxic and caused diseases like tapeworm and trichinosis.


    The Vegetarian magazine vol.4 no.11, August 1900. Courtesy of HathiTrust

    Adverts also relied on testimonials from famous sports stars and leading medical figures, praising the health benefits of meat substitutes which were presented as a panacea that could make people fitter, stronger and more youthful. Calls to “return to nature” and eat like our ancestors were also frequent – what food scholars today refer to as “nutritional primitivism”.

    To reassure anxious consumers, the adverts emphasised the products’ similarity in taste and appearance to meat. They also suggested that meat substitutes could make housewives’ lives easier, as they required little preparation and could be served in a variety of ways.

    Meat substitutes today

    Today, many meat substitute products are made by large food corporations that also sell meat. Because of this, marketing has evolved, with meat substitutes often positioned as part of a wider range of dietary choices, rather than simply replacements for meat.

    As a result, the bold, critical ads of the past that attacked meat consumption have become less common. Instead, today’s adverts often focus on environmental concerns and the ethics of eating meat, linking bodily health with the health of the planet.




    Read more:
    Lab–grown and plant–based meat: the science, psychology and future of meat alternatives – podcast


    However, many still highlight how meat substitutes look and taste like real meat. This can unintentionally reinforce the idea that “good” nutrition is based on meat, and diminish the value of meat substitutes in their own right.

    I believe today’s adverts could do more to educate people about the nutritional benefits and variety of meat-free foods, while also raising awareness about the environmental impact of animal agriculture. This shift could help meat substitutes stand on their own as viable food choices, moving them beyond the trend cycle and into mainstream diets.

    Lauren Alex O’Hagan does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    – ref. How controversial nutritionist John Harvey Kellogg pioneered the path to modern plant-based eating – https://theconversation.com/how-controversial-nutritionist-john-harvey-kellogg-pioneered-the-path-to-modern-plant-based-eating-252960

    MIL OSI – Global Reports –

    April 2, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Global: Activists living in exile could strengthen Canada’s democracy — if given the right support

    Source: The Conversation – Canada – By Philip Leech-Ngo, Visiting Professor, Ethics and International Development, L’Université d’Ottawa/University of Ottawa

    Mounting threats to Canadian sovereignty, particularly — but not exclusively — from United States President Donald Trump, have sparked renewed calls for national resilience.

    Trump’s tariffs on Canada and Mexico and inflammatory rhetoric have fuelled a wave of patriotism and nationalism.

    However, true independence goes beyond economic concerns. It’s about cultivating, committing to and preserving democratic values, including the protection of fundamental rights and freedoms, and ways of governance that ensure every person is valued, represented and belongs.

    Historically, Canada has provided refuge to those who have risked everything to oppose authoritarian regimes, including activists living in exile.

    Activists-in-exile are individuals who have been forced to flee their countries due to their work defending human rights, advocating for democratic governance, rooting out corruption, peacebuilding, demanding environmental protection and practising independent journalism, among other endeavours.

    These individuals bring with them not only their personal stories and attitudes of resilience, but also their expertise in governance, human rights and social justice. As Canada faces growing challenges and uncertainty, they represent a tremendous potential asset to help Canada defend democracy and promote sustainable peace and development.

    A vital force for democracy

    Despite their displacement, activists-in-exile continue to play a crucial role in global democratic movements. Unlike traditional diaspora groups focused on cultural preservation, activists-in-exile engage in direct political advocacy and often work to expose foreign interference, counter disinformation and support democratic movements from afar.

    Our initiative, Voices in Exile, researches activists-in-exile and amplifies their contributions and advocates for policies that recognize their particular roles in defending democracy and social justice. Their efforts combat corruption, foster peace and protect human rights and well-being.

    An introduction to the Voices in Exile project.

    These individuals have championed women’s rights, campaigned against genocide and fought for free expression and accountable governance. Many continue their advocacy in exile, shaping public discourse and influencing policies both in Canada and abroad.

    By welcoming these activists, Canada could strengthen its own institutions — domestically and abroad — and make them more resistant to the forces that undermine democracy, justice and freedom worldwide. Their work is critical in resisting authoritarianism and countering both digital and physical foreign interference.

    Overlooking activists-in-exile

    Despite their potential, activists-in-exile are often overlooked or met with skepticism in Canada.

    Some Canadian politicians, like federal Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre, have framed their views of patriotism as a matter of national security and economic self-sufficiency, warning against foreign influences. Poilievre recently said immigrants should “leave the war behind” when coming to Canada, implying their past struggles should be forgotten upon arrival.

    This is certainly easier said than done, especially in an age where technology can keep people instantly connected across borders. It’s unrealistic and unfair to expect newcomers simply to forget who supported them in their hour of need or the communities that continue to suffer in their absence. They are also unlikely to surrender ongoing interests or their basic values.

    Through our work with Voices in Exile, we have learned that many newcomers involuntarily leave behind family, livelihoods and status, only to face significant hurdles re-establishing themselves in Canada. While some activists-in-exile persist and continue to be impactful, they often do so under unnecessary constraints that limit their full potential.

    If legitimate concerns about professional qualifications and social stability exist, they can be addressed through tailored support systems. While Canada provides resettlement for a limited number of human rights defenders, there is no program to engage with them once they arrive. This needs to change.

    At the same time, activists-in-exile should not be treated solely as victims or as potential risks, particularly in light of growing transnational repression. Instead, their specialized knowledge and skills should be recognized as a force to strengthen democracy both in Canada and their countries of origin.

    A strategic investment

    Recognizing and supporting activists-in-exile would be a strategic investment for Canada, not an act of charity. Many have become educators, researchers and policymakers, shaping debates on governance and security.

    Others have founded organizations, launched media platforms and built networks that support democracy movements globally. As our project Voices in Exile shows, many activists-in-exile also contribute to Canada’s economy, and work in law, social and psycho-social services, and the media landscape.

    Beyond being a matter of principle, welcoming activists-in-exile is a move that would strengthen Canada’s leadership in the global fight for democracy. Their integration into Canadian society aligns with Canada’s longstanding role in promoting democratic ideals on the world stage.

    Yet, despite their vast potential, there is no tailored public policy or dedicated institution to harness this human capital in a way that aligns with Canada’s democratic commitments. The existing guidelines for supporting human rights defenders are insufficient for supporting activists-in-exile.

    Canada should support exiled activists by facilitating collaboration among these individuals and Canadian public, academic, community, government and civil society organizations. In addition, Canada should establish a legal framework that allows activists-in-exile to contribute to the development of foreign policy. A dedicated fund should also be created that offers financial support for their activist efforts.

    As global authoritarianism continues to rise, the question is not whether we should acknowledge activists-in-exile — it is whether we have the wisdom to lead by example and invest in recognizing and supporting them.

    Philip Leech-Ngo receives funding from Open Societies Foundation

    Frederick John Packer has received funding from SSHRC and OSF.

    Nadia Abu-Zahra has received funding from SSHRC and OSF.

    – ref. Activists living in exile could strengthen Canada’s democracy — if given the right support – https://theconversation.com/activists-living-in-exile-could-strengthen-canadas-democracy-if-given-the-right-support-251440

    MIL OSI – Global Reports –

    April 2, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Attorney General Bonta, Assemblymember Haney Unveil Legislation to Protect 17 Million Californians From Unfair Rent Fees

    Source: US State of California Department of Justice

    AB 1248 seeks to protect tenants from unfair and unpredictable fees  

    OAKLAND — California Attorney General Rob Bonta, Assemblymember Matt Haney (D-San Francisco), and a prominent coalition of organizations today unveiled Assembly Bill 1248 (AB 1248), legislation that seeks to protect tenants from unpredictable and costly housing fees. In recent years, some landlords have adopted the practice of charging separate piecemeal fees in addition to the rent, which can cost tenants hundreds of dollars more each month on top of the base rent. This practice hinders tenants’ financial stability and ability to budget for housing and other needs — and hurts landlords who do not charge these fees by putting them at a competitive disadvantage and creating an unfair marketplace. The practice of charging separate piecemeal fees has become even more rampant since the enactment of California’s Tenant Protection Act (TPA), which provides statewide rent-increase protections. AB 1248 aims to prevent landlords from unbundling housing services — many of which have traditionally been covered by rent — and then charging additional, often mandatory, fees for those services. AB 1248 makes clear that landlords cannot play games with state rent caps by charging fees that amount to shadow rent increases or advertise a deceptively low rent. By prohibiting added fees, AB 1248 will help ensure that tenants’ housing payments remain stable and predictable, and that people can compare true costs when searching for housing within their budget. 

    “When landlords tack on fees on top of rent it makes it almost impossible for families to compare housing costs or plan for monthly expenses. As it stands, the scarcity and high cost of housing means California’s 17 million renters spend a significant portion of their paychecks on rent, with an estimated 150,000 people at risk of eviction any given month,” said Attorney General Rob Bonta. “The price of housing should be clear to California tenants in the same way that the cost of a concert ticket or a hotel is clear to California consumers. I thank Assemblymember Haney for introducing legislation to ensure California tenants receive the full protection afforded to them by the Tenant Protection Act. AB 1248 will help Californians’ housing payments remain straightforward, stable, and predictable.”

    “Housing costs in California are already high, and added fees only make it harder for renters to budget and stay financially stable. These unfair and unpredictable costs are nothing more than a scam that drives up housing expenses and leaves tenants paying far more than they expected,” said Assemblymember Matt Haney (D-San Francisco). “AB 1248 ensures fairness by making sure the rent tenants agree to is the rent they actually pay. This bill will help protect Californians from misleading pricing practices and create a more honest and predictable rental market.”

    “Unfair fees in the rental housing market have exploded in recent years — far too many consumers feel the crushing burden of all these unpredictable fees on a monthly basis,” said Robert Herrell, Executive Director of the Consumer Federation of California. “This bill by Assemblymember Haney will dramatically improve consumer protections so renters don’t get taken advantage of. We are proud to co-sponsor this bill with Attorney General Bonta and other leading consumer housing advocates.”

    “Low-income renters need certainty in their monthly rent payments. Most of these tenants are already severely rent-burdened and struggling to retain their housing. The exploitive practice of adding on fees after a lease has already been signed or charging for services that had previously been included in rent makes it even harder for people to stay housed,” said Brian Augusta, Legislative Advocate, California Rural Legal Assistance Foundation. “We are proud to co-sponsor this measure with the Attorney General and the Consumer Federation and thank Assemblymember Haney for authoring it.” 

    Co-authored by Attorney General Bonta during his time as a state assemblymember, the Tenant Protection Act (TPA) was signed into law by Governor Gavin Newsom in 2019. It created significant statewide protections for most tenants, including by limiting rent increases and prohibiting landlords from evicting tenants without just cause. Under the TPA, landlords cannot raise the gross rental rate more than 10% total or 5% plus the percentage change in the cost of living – whichever is lower – over a 12-month period.

    Particularly since enactment of the TPA, an increasing number of landlords, including large corporate landlords, are charging tenants a proliferation of separate fees, including for services that should be and have historically been covered by the rent. For example, some landlords charge monthly fees for pest control, “trash concierge” services, and Ratio Utility Billing System (RUBS) fees where tenants are charged for a portion of the building’s utilities, like water and sewer, based on a complex formula with little transparency and that landlords can often change at any time, resulting in charges that can vary widely from month to month. These fees can add up to hundreds of dollars each month on top of rent.

    By engaging in this practice, these landlords place significant burdens on tenants, including uncertainty about monthly housing costs due to variable or increasing fees, and create an unfair and confusing marketplace for prospective tenants and honest landlords — particularly small “mom and pop” landlords — who don’t engage in this deceptive pricing practice. If the combination of rent increases and new fees exceed the TPA’s rent cap, these landlords are also violating California law. 

    With the number of various fee and fee increases, it may be difficult for tenants to keep track of their monthly payments. When a landlord applies a tenant’s payment to late fees or other obligations before applying it to the rent and then charges a late fee because they consider the rent to not be fully paid, it can create a spiral of rent debt for the tenant, which increases the risk of eviction for nonpayment of rent.

     AB 1248 would: 

    • Require landlords to include all costs in the rent rather than charging separate fees.
    • Create more predictable housing costs for existing tenants by preventing landlords from adding new fees during a tenancy.
    • Require landlords to apply a tenant’s rent payment to their rent first, which will help prevent landlords from creating a debt spiral for tenants.

    Text of this legislation can be found here.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    April 2, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: BTCC Exchange and Red Eagle Foundation Raise £30,000 for Disadvantaged Children at Kent Construction Golf Cup Featuring Premier League Legend Matt Le Tissier

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    A Media Snippet accompanying this announcement is available by clicking on this link.

    VILNIUS, Lithuania, April 01, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — BTCC, the world’s longest-serving crypto exchange, proudly partnered again with the Red Eagle Foundation for a successful Kent Construction Golf Cup on March 27, 2025 at the prestigious London Golf Club. As a headline sponsor, BTCC helped raise £30,000 after costs to support disabled, disadvantaged, and terminally ill children across the UK.

    Now in its second collaboration with the Red Eagle Foundation, BTCC continues to give back and support causes that make a difference. The Kent Construction Golf Cup brought together 28 teams from across the industry for an exciting day of competition and fundraising on the Heritage course at the London Golf Club.

    Highlights included lively entertainment by comedian Aaron James, a Q&A session with sports television pundit Scott Minto and Premier League legend Matt Le Tissier, and an exciting competition featuring former European Tour player Steven Tiley. AIMIS took home the top prize, with Clean Slate Demolition securing second place.

    Aaryn Ling, Head of Branding at BTCC, shared her appreciation for Matt Le Tissier’s involvement in the event. “Partnering with the Red Eagle Foundation for the second time is our way of giving back,” said Aaryn. “Matt Le Tissier’s support was phenomenal — his presence helped drive both energy and donations.”

    BTCC’s ongoing partnership with the Red Eagle Foundation will continue, with more charitable initiatives already in the works to support disadvantaged children.

    As a token of appreciation for its loyal community, BTCC will also be launching a giveaway featuring a signed shirt by Matt Le Tissier. Fans and supporters are encouraged to stay tuned for more details on the exchange’s X (Twitter).

    About BTCC

    Founded in 2011, BTCC is a leading cryptocurrency exchange committed to making crypto trading reliable and accessible. With a decade-long track record, BTCC offers a secure platform for crypto trading with its community-driven campaigns.

    Official website: https://www.btcc.com/en-US

    X: https://x.com/BTCCexchange

    Contact: press@btcc.com

    The MIL Network –

    April 2, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: Bitget Wallet Launches First LSD Earn Zone, Introducing Flexible Onchain Yield

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    SAN SALVADOR, El Salvador, April 01, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Bitget Wallet, a leading Web3 non-custodial wallet, has launched the industry’s first LSD Earn Zone, offering users a new way to earn onchain yields while keeping their crypto assets liquid. This feature introduces Liquid Staking Derivatives (LSDs) into a simplified wallet experience, allowing users to grow their holdings without traditional staking lockups or restrictions.

    LSDs represent a new category of staking assets that combine yield generation with asset flexibility. When users stake tokens such as ETH or SOL on supported DeFi platforms, they receive equivalent derivative tokens in return. These tokens, known as Liquid Staking Derivatives, continue to accrue staking rewards but remain tradable and usable across DeFi protocols. This means users can earn passive income while still being able to trade, swap, provide liquidity or participate in other DeFi activities with the derivative tokens — maximizing both earning potential and asset utility. By eliminating the need to lock assets for fixed periods, LSDs make staking more accessible and efficient.

    At launch, Bitget Wallet’s LSD Earn Zone supports four carefully selected products across Ethereum, Solana, and BNB Chain, offering annual yields ranging from approximately 4% to 8%. These include sUSDe, a USD-pegged stablecoin issued by Ethena; USDY, a real-world asset-backed token linked to U.S. Treasury yields via Ondo Finance; sUSDS, a multi-chain yield aggregator that dynamically allocates capital to top-performing protocols; and JitoSOL, a derivative token from Solana’s largest LSD protocol, enhanced through MEV strategies. All options are accessible via the “Hold to Earn” section of Bitget Wallet’s Earn tab, with real-time yield tracking and instant activation.

    Security and transparency are central to Bitget Wallet’s design. As a fully non-custodial wallet, it ensures that users retain complete control of their funds at all times. Unlike centralized platforms that carry counterparty risk, Bitget Wallet connects users directly to audited, battle-tested DeFi protocols. LSD products integrated into the Earn Zone undergo strict security reviews, and users benefit from real-time earnings visibility and seamless redemption. Bitget Wallet is further supported by a $300 million Protection Fund, offering additional reassurance in the event of unforeseen security risks.

    Bitget Wallet’s launch of LSD Earn Zone signals Web3 wallet’s evolution into the enhanced yield phase of onchain finance. With upcoming support for networks including Tron, Base, Sonic, and Sui, Bitget Wallet will continue expanding earning opportunities while improving onchain capital efficiency. Alvin Kan, COO of Bitget Wallet, highlighted “As part of our broader Payfi strategy, we’re building tools that enable assets to earn yield continuously while remaining usable for other utilities. This is how money should work — flexible, efficient, and always active. Bitget Wallet offers a unified experience that combines earning, trading, and payments in one place, building an everyday finance hub for the next generation of users.”

    For more details, please visit Bitget Wallet blog.

    About Bitget Wallet
    Bitget Wallet is the home of Web3, uniting endless possibilities in one non-custodial wallet. With over 60 million users, it offers comprehensive onchain services, including asset management, instant swaps, rewards, staking, trading tools, live market data, a DApp browser and crypto payment solutions. Supporting over 130 blockchains, 20,000+ DApps, and millions of tokens, Bitget Wallet enables seamless multi-chain trading across hundreds of DEXs and cross-chain bridges, along with a $300+ million protection fund to ensure safety of users’ assets. Experience Bitget Wallet Lite to start a Web3 journey.

    For more information, visit: X | Telegram | Instagram | YouTube | LinkedIn | TikTok | Discord | Facebook

    For media inquiries, please contact media.web3@bitget.com

    A photo accompanying this announcement is available at https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/40a2062c-d8f8-4b48-a040-4b2863006843

    The MIL Network –

    April 2, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Global: Salafi Muslims are going into politics instead of trying to change the world through religious education or jihadi violence

    Source: The Conversation – UK – By Guy Robert Patrick Eyre, Research Fellow, Alwaleed Centre, University of Edinburgh, University of Edinburgh

    Pseudonyms are used in this article to protect the anonymity of the research participants.

    I met Sheikh Ahmed at a small mosque in central Morocco in October 2016. He told me: “We used to believe that Islam forbids all modern politics. We believed that politics was a western practice that divides Muslims and distracts them from worship.”

    Ahmed is a proponent of Salafism, a form of Islamic “fundamentalism” and one of the most influential religious movements of the past 40 years. He continued: “But from 2011, we began to understand that Islam in fact requires us to enter politics.”

    Salafi attacks perpetrated by al-Qaida and the so-called Islamic State (IS) have led to enormous interest in Islamic fundamentalism among western analysts, policymakers and journalists. This commentary has tended to understand Salafism to be a broadly static global ideology, inherently opposed to modern politics and largely detached from what is happening in the neighbourhoods in which its followers live and worship.

    During eight years of in-depth research on Salafi groups in north Africa, I found something significant. In response to the “Arab Uprising” protests that shook north Africa and the wider Arab world between 2010 and 2012, many north African Salafis – including Ahmed – began to rethink their ideological convictions. Many decided their goal of changing the world required neither “apolitical” religious education nor violence. Instead, many began to participate in parliamentary politics.

    Also known as “Wahhabism”, Salafism emerged in Islamic institutions and universities in Saudi Arabia and the wider Arab Gulf by the 1960s. Despite being widely regarded as a Saudi Arabia-centred ideology, Salafism has since been adopted – and, importantly, adapted – by a large number of pious Muslims in north Africa, the wider Muslim world, and the west.

    Salafis share a religious doctrine that calls on Muslims to revive an “authentic” approach to Islam centred on strict monotheism. Salafis have traditionally argued, therefore, that Muslims should reject modern politics. Instead, they must dedicate themselves to applying the beliefs and practices of the first generations of Muslims in all aspects of their lives.

    Nevertheless, Salafis have long disagreed over how exactly to apply this doctrine to society and politics. Should they focus on religious education and preaching in an effort to form an “authentic” Muslim community? Or should they criticise their political rulers or revolt?

    Jihadi Salafis respond to this dilemma by supporting the use of revolutionary violence. They see it as a means of fighting westernisation and unseating “un-Islamic” rulers. By contrast, mainstream “quietist” Salafis reject both politics and violence as “immoral” practices. Instead, they seek to change the world through religious preaching and by offering strict loyalty to political rulers as a matter of faith.

    From the late 1970s until the late 2000s, Salafism gradually spread from the Arab Gulf into North Africa. This took place as Moroccan, Tunisian, Libyan and Egyptian students returned to their countries of origin after studying in Saudi Arabia and the broader Arab Gulf. Back home, many established quietist Salafi movements.

    To different extents, North African regimes thought their “apolitical” beliefs and loyalty to governments made them useful allies. Consequently, quietist Salafis were generally allowed to expand their religious activities. By the late 1990s, they had gained significant local followings.

    In tandem, North African jihadi Salafis returned from the insurgency in Afghanistan (1978-92) and also built followings in their home countries. Jihadi Salafi militants led violent attacks against both local and western targets in north Africa. Consequently, they were harshly repressed by security forces.

    After the Arab Spring: choosing politics

    The Salafi rejection of politics was dramatically upended by the Arab Uprising protests between late 2010 and 2012. Dictators in Tunisia, Libya and Egypt were swiftly deposed. While the Moroccan monarchy was not overthrown, to appease the demonstrators it relinquished some control over the political system and introduced limited reforms.

    Determined to take advantage of these new political openings, many quietist and former jihadi Salafis across North Africa suddenly turned political. They established political parties, ran for political office, and forged new political alliances. Perhaps most spectacularly, a new Salafi party in Egypt captured a quarter of the vote in the 2011-12 parliamentary elections.

    In neighbouring Libya, mounting political instability following the downfall of its former president, Muammar Gaddafi, in 2011 saw quietist and former jihadi Salafis win positions within local ministries and establish informal police forces. Quietist and former jihadi Salafis in Morocco and Tunisia also joined, formed alliances with, and established political parties.

    This rapid politicisation of North African Salafism challenges long-held assumptions about Islamic fundamentalism. Salafis are not inherently apolitical, and their approach to politics and violence is not set in stone by a global, Saudi Arabia-influenced religious doctrine.

    Rather, they are pragmatic and flexible. The large political openings in North Africa brought about by the Arab Uprisings pushed them to rethink their core religious beliefs as they sought to expand their influence.

    As such, rather than being an idiosyncratic and uniquely dogmatic movement, Salafis are much like other ideological religious movements. They are savvy political players who can adjust their strategies and “universalist” worldviews according to the current situation, wherever they live.

    Dr. Guy Robert Eyre receives funding for his research on North African Salafism from the Gerda Henkel Foundation.

    – ref. Salafi Muslims are going into politics instead of trying to change the world through religious education or jihadi violence – https://theconversation.com/salafi-muslims-are-going-into-politics-instead-of-trying-to-change-the-world-through-religious-education-or-jihadi-violence-247259

    MIL OSI – Global Reports –

    April 2, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Global: Urban cemeteries are at capacity – here’s how they can be more sustainable

    Source: The Conversation – UK – By Daniela Pianezzi, Associate Professor in Work and Organization Studies, University of Verona

    Ondrej Prosicky/Shutterstock

    Approximately 170,000 people die every day around the world – that’s around 62 million deaths in 2024 alone. The cumulative effect of this has led to what has been termed a “burial crisis”, with most urban areas where burial remains the norm expected to run out of interment space by the 2050s, some much earlier – as in, now.

    Major cities, including London and Sydney anticipate severe space shortages within the next decade. Smaller community cemeteries, such as Nuneaton cemetery in Warwickshire have already reached full capacity and begun directing families elsewhere. Finding culturally acceptable yet ethically responsible, accessible and sustainable ways of laying to rest, mourning and honouring our loved ones has become an urgent global issue.

    However, the cemetery sector has only recently begun to seriously consider the environmental consequences of how we handle our bodies after death. The sense of urgency coincides with a significant cultural shift, as cremation increasingly replaces traditional burial methods. This is due to societal secularisation, shifts in religious doctrines (including Catholicism lifting past bans) and its affordability compared to burial.

    In the UK, the percentage of cremations has risen from 9% of total burials in 1946 to 80.64% in 2023.

    Yet, cremation is far from a sustainable alternative to burial. It releases substantial amounts of pollutants, notably carbon dioxide and mercury emissions, so regulation is necessary. Technologically advanced techniques, such as water cremation – a process that uses an alkali-water-based solution to reduce a body to bones – have only recently begun to emerge as possible alternatives and remain niche.

    For several years, we have been studying cemeteries in Italy and the UK. Despite the deeply different burial traditions in these two countries (unlike the UK, Italy remains a burial culture) both face the same environmental challenges.

    A tale of two cemeteries

    A few sites do offer environmentally conscious alternatives to traditional burial. One is in Liguria, a densely populated region in northwestern Italy that has suffered significant losses due to climate change, particularly from soil erosion caused by decades of reckless coastal construction.

    Here, a group of environmentally conscious volunteers transformed a woodland called Boschi Vivi (the name means living woods) into a cemetery, creating Italy’s first forest cemetery. Though it involves cremation, this initiative is particularly groundbreaking in a country where cemeteries have historically been conceived as monumental or architectural structures.

    Often, they are heavily reliant on marble, a traditional hallmark of Italian craftsmanship, significantly reducing green spaces in urban areas. The mining of marble also creates huge greenhouse gas emissions and loss of biodiversity.

    In contrast, the cimitero bosco (forest cemetery) of Boschi Vivi follows a different philosophy. Instead of traditional tombstones, only a small plaque is placed near each tree where ashes have been scattered, marking the final resting place of the deceased.

    A tree tomb in the woodland of Boschi Vivi, Liguria, Italy.
    Daniela Pianezzi, CC BY-NC-ND

    Currently, this remains a grassroots initiative that’s starting to emerge in the US and Canada too. Hopefully, more Italian public administrations will adopt this model as traditional cemeteries become increasingly financially and environmentally unsustainable.

    For three decades, Oakfield burial ground in Wrabness, Essex, UK has adopted a similar approach. Oakfield wood is a seven-acre natural woodland burial site along the banks of the river Stour in north Essex, managed by the Essex Wildlife Trust. Instead of headstones or conventional memorials, a native broadleaf tree is planted for each burial, accompanied by a simple wooden plaque at its base. The site forms part of a larger nature reserve, fostering a rich habitat for wildlife.

    Unlike municipal cemeteries or other burial sites, which are often subject to redevelopment or reuse, Oakfield enjoys long-term protection under the Essex Wildlife Trust. This means that burials here are conducted in perpetuity, ensuring that the site remains undisturbed. The trust plans to manage Oakfield solely as a nature reserve once it reaches full capacity, although this will not be for many decades to come.

    Despite these promising initiatives, sites such as Boschi Vivi and Oakwood risk remaining isolated cases unless a radical rethinking of burial takes place. Whether cemeteries are perceived as eerie, macabre spaces (like in Shakespeare’s Hamlet) or as places of peace and reconciliation, as in the final scene of Forrest Gump, they are still dominated by the idea that graves should be organised as a series of permanent markers of individual lives.

    Our research shows that it’s only by considering human beings as part of nature that the growing burial crisis might be averted. That fundamentally involves moving from a human-centred or “ego-logical” ethos to an ecological one.

    The most viable response to the environmental challenges facing not just Nuneaton cemetery, but burial sites across the world, might be simply a new awareness. One that recognises both life and death as integral parts of nature. So, remembrance is not preserved through permanence, but rather through a return to the natural cycle of life.


    Don’t have time to read about climate change as much as you’d like?

    Get a weekly roundup in your inbox instead. Every Wednesday, The Conversation’s environment editor writes Imagine, a short email that goes a little deeper into just one climate issue. Join the 40,000+ readers who’ve subscribed so far.


    The authors do not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and have disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    – ref. Urban cemeteries are at capacity – here’s how they can be more sustainable – https://theconversation.com/urban-cemeteries-are-at-capacity-heres-how-they-can-be-more-sustainable-252711

    MIL OSI – Global Reports –

    April 2, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Global: Why a presidential term limit got written into the Constitution – the story of the 22nd Amendment

    Source: The Conversation – USA – By Mark Satta, Associate Professor of Philosophy and Law, Wayne State University

    No president other than Franklin D. Roosevelt has held office for more than two terms. Walter Leporati/Getty Images

    Only one person, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, has ever served more than two terms as president of the United States. This is for two reasons.

    First, prior to Roosevelt’s election to a third term in 1940 there was a longstanding American tradition that presidents not serve more than two terms.

    This tradition was established by the decisions of early presidents such as George Washington, Thomas Jefferson and James Madison not to seek a third term. This tradition was later adopted by other presidents.

    Second, after Roosevelt died in office in 1945 during his fourth term, Congress and the people of the United States decided to turn the long-standing tradition that presidents should not serve more than two terms into a part of constitutional law.

    This was done through the passage and ratification of the 22nd Amendment, which became part of the U.S. Constitution in 1951.

    Only after the death of President Franklin Roosevelt, who died in 1945 in his fourth term and whose casket is seen here, did the U.S. codify the two-term limit on presidents.
    AP photo

    Intent is clear

    The key provision of the 22nd Amendment reads as follows: “No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once.”

    The intent is clear. No one is supposed to serve more than two full terms as president.

    The only way someone can serve more than two terms is if they served less than two years in a previous term in which they weren’t elected president.

    Here’s an example: If a vice president becomes president during the final year of a term because the president died, that vice president could still run for two terms. But that exception is still meant to bar anyone from serving more than a total of 10 years as president.

    It is worth understanding why the two-term tradition was considered so important that it was turned into constitutional law the first time it was violated.

    Starting the tradition

    Commentators often cite George Washington’s decision not to seek a third term as president as establishing the two-term tradition. Political scientist and term limit scholar Michael Korzi gives a lot more credit to the nation’s third president, Thomas Jefferson.

    Jefferson was outspoken in favor of the two-term tradition. As Korzi notes, this was, in part, because “Jefferson saw little distinction between a long-serving executive in an elective position and a hereditary monarch.” In other words, a president without term limits is too much like a king.

    John Trumbull’s portrait of U.S. President Thomas Jefferson, who believed that a president who was willing to break the two-term tradition was too ambitious.
    John Trumbull/GraphicaArtis, Getty Images

    Jefferson saw a president who was willing to break the two-term tradition as power hungry, and he hoped that the American people would not elect such a president. This led him to write in his autobiography in 1821 that “should a President consent to be a candidate for a 3d. election, I trust he would be rejected on this demonstration of ambitious views.”

    Jefferson also worried that without term limits, presidents would stay in office too long into their old age and after they had lost their ability to govern effectively. This led him to write that without term limits, there was a danger that “the indulgence and attachments of the people will keep a man in the chair after he becomes a dotard.”

    Subsequently, presidents tended to abide by the two-term tradition. And in the few cases where presidents decided to seek a third term, their own parties would not give them the nomination.

    That remained true until Roosevelt ran for, and won, both a third and a fourth term as president during World War II.

    The 22nd Amendment

    Roosevelt’s violation of the two-term tradition prompted Congress and the states to turn the tradition into a formal matter of constitutional law.

    A major concern motivating the amendment was the same one that motivated Jefferson: to prevent a president from becoming a king. Multiple members of Congress identified the same concern during congressional sessions in the 1940s.

    Sen. Chapman Revercomb from West Virginia stated that power given to a president without term limits “would be a definite step in the direction of autocracy, regardless of the name given the office, whether it be president, king, dictator, emperor, or whatever title the office may carry.”

    Similarly, Rep. Edward McCowen from Ohio said that the 22nd Amendment would be “a great step toward preventing a dictatorship or some totalitarian form of government from arising.”

    And Rep. John Jennings Jr. from Tennessee stated that only by adoption of the 22nd Amendment “can the people be assured that we shall never have a dictator in this land.”

    Congress passed the 22nd Amendment on March 21, 1947. It took less than four years for the necessary three-fourths of the states to ratify the amendment, which became law on Feb. 27, 1951.

    President Donald Trump has repeatedly talked about getting a third term as president.
    Brendan Smialowski/AFP via Getty Images

    Tyrants and term limit violations

    In the 1980s, political scientist Juan Linz identified that presidential systems are less stable than other forms of democracy, such as parliamentary systems. The difference seems to be that presidential systems concentrate more power in the hands of a single person, the president. This makes it easier to remove the checks and balances that democracies depend on.

    As scholars have noted, violation of presidential term limits and other methods of increasing executive power are a common form of democratic backsliding – state-led debilitation or elimination of the political institutions that sustain a democracy.

    Law professor Mila Versteeg and her colleagues have shown that in recent years presidents around the globe have used various tactics to try to violate presidential term limits. These tactics include trying to amend their country’s constitution, trying to get the courts to reinterpret the constitution, finding a replacement leader who the former president can control once out of office and attempting to delay elections.

    They note that most of the time when a president’s attempt to violate term limits fails it is “because the attempt encountered widespread popular resistance.” They conclude that this finding implies that “broad resistance movements” may be the best means to prevent violation of presidential term limits.

    Mark Satta does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    – ref. Why a presidential term limit got written into the Constitution – the story of the 22nd Amendment – https://theconversation.com/why-a-presidential-term-limit-got-written-into-the-constitution-the-story-of-the-22nd-amendment-253421

    MIL OSI – Global Reports –

    April 2, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: Local Evictions LLC Launches Innovative Insurance Plan for Landlords

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Local Evictions LLC Unveils Comprehensive Insurance Solution for Landlords

     Lawrenceville, GA , April 01, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) —  Local Evictions LLC, a leader in eviction services with over two decades of experience, has announced the launch of a groundbreaking insurance plan designed to protect landlords from the financial uncertainties associated with property management. This first-of-its-kind insurance plan offers coverage for missed rent, legal fees, and property damage, providing landlords with a safety net that ensures peace of mind and financial stability.

    Protection That Covers More Than Just Property — Introducing Insurance for Landlords by Local Evictions LLC

    Local Evictions LLC, headquartered in Atlanta, has long been recognized for its expertise in streamlining the eviction process for landlords, property managers, and attorneys. The introduction of this innovative insurance plan marks a significant expansion of the company’s service offerings, reinforcing its commitment to supporting property owners in every aspect of property management.

    The new insurance plan is tailored to address the unique challenges faced by landlords, offering comprehensive coverage that mitigates the risks associated with tenant defaults and property damage. By covering missed rent payments, legal expenses, and repair costs, the plan ensures that landlords can maintain their financial health even in the face of unforeseen challenges.

    “This insurance plan is a game-changer for landlords,” said Will Addo, CEO of “By providing coverage for missed rent, legal fees, and property damage, we are empowering property owners to manage their investments with confidence and security.”

    Local Evictions LLC‘s new insurance offering is expected to set a new standard in the real estate industry, providing landlords with a level of protection that has been previously unavailable. The plan is designed to be accessible and affordable, ensuring that landlords of all sizes can benefit from its comprehensive coverage.

    As the real estate market continues to evolve, Local Evictions LLC remains at the forefront of innovation, consistently developing solutions that meet the changing needs of property owners. This new insurance plan is a testament to the company’s dedication to enhancing the landlord experience, offering a robust solution that addresses the financial risks inherent in property management.

    For more information about Local Evictions LLC and their new insurance plan, interested parties are encouraged to reach out directly to the company to learn more about how this innovative solution can benefit their property management strategies.

    Peace of Mind, Signed and Sealed — Landlords Now Have Access to Powerful Coverage Against Tenant Defaults.

    About Local Evictions LLC

    Local Evictions LLC is a specialized eviction services company that helps landlords, property managers, and attorneys efficiently regain possession of their properties. With over 20 years of experience, the company provides full-service eviction solutions, including filing, setouts, junk removal, and coordination with off-duty officers to expedite the process. Operating primarily in Georgia, Local Evictions LLC streamlines the eviction process, ensuring legal compliance and swift resolution for residential and commercial property owners.

    Press inquiries

    Local Evictions LLC
    https://localevictions.io
    Will Addo
    Press@localevictions.io
    678-702-2271 

    The MIL Network –

    April 2, 2025
  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Much-needed affordable homes and new community centre a step closer for Oxford

    Source: City of Oxford

    The first affordable homes to be built as part of the regeneration of Oxford’s Blackbird Leys are on track to be ready for new residents from this summer.

    84 shared ownership homes, currently being built by Peabody and Oxford City Council at Knight’s Road, will be made available in a phased rollout between this summer and next spring. They will offer people an affordable route into home ownership. Anyone interested in the two- and three-bedroom homes is encouraged to visit peabodynewhomes.co.uk/theaviary or call 020 3468 2605 for more information. 

    Next spring will also see 61 brand new homes for social rent in the District Centre. These one-, two- and three-bedroom apartments, also currently under construction, will go to households on the council’s housing waiting list, helping to meet the huge demand for social rent homes in the city. A further 51 social rent apartments are expected to be finished in 2027.  

    On Wednesday 26 March, Peabody, Oxford City Council and their construction partner The Hill Group held a ‘topping out’ ceremony to officially mark the construction of the first block of social homes reaching its highest point.  

    It was a significant milestone for the two-phase regeneration project, which will ultimately see a total of 294 new homes built in the District Centre and in Knights Road. The mix of houses and flats will accommodate larger families as well as smaller households.   

    The project will also bring a raft of improvements to the District Centre, with new shops, green spaces, dedicated cycle routes and a purpose-built community centre. A detailed planning application for the new community centre – to be owned and run by the council – was submitted in October, following extensive consultation with local people. The application is expected to be decided by Oxford City Council’s planning committee in early summer.   

    Comment  

    “Oxford is a world class city, but like many places, it’s expensive to live in and desperately needs more affordable housing. So, it’s fantastic to see the construction at Blackbird Leys moving along so well. We’re looking forward to making these homes available from later this year and to continue with the improvements that will revitalise the District Centre, benefiting everyone in the community.” 

    Simon Barry, Regional Managing Director, Development at Peabody 

    “Topping out is a milestone in our partnership with Peabody, marking an important step towards the completion of the first new homes in the redevelopment of Blackbird Leys. We also hope to see a new Blackbird Leys Community Centre get planning permission in the coming months.”

    Tom Bridgman, Deputy Chief Executive – Place for Oxford City Council

    “It’s been fantastic to host this topping out milestone at Blackbird Leys in Oxford – reaching the highest point of this 10-storey apartment building is truly a moment to celebrate. We have constructed the first phase of this project for our long-standing partners at Peabody with a fabric-first approach, putting sustainability at the forefront of this design. The project includes green spaces, cycle routes and a community centre. We are now looking forward to completing these homes by summer 2027 so we can help Oxford City Council meet the large demand for high-quality affordable housing in the city.” 

    Greg Hill, Deputy Chief Executive of The Hill Group

    MIL OSI United Kingdom –

    April 2, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Trump Tariffs on Canada Jeopardize Aerospace, Defense, and Manufacturing Sectors While Threatening National Security

    Source: US GOIAM Union

    Brian Bryant, International President of the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers (IAM), representing 600,000 workers, and David Chartrand, IAM Canadian General Vice President, today issued a strong rebuke of President Trump’s tariffs, warning of severe economic consequences and job losses across the United States and Canada:

    “President Trump’s scatter-shot tariffs are a direct assault on American and Canadian workers. They will destabilize critical sectors like aerospace and manufacturing, jeopardizing hundreds of thousands of jobs and undermining national security.

    “These tariffs will not bring our jobs home. They will raise prices on everything. They will wreck our supply chains on both sides of the border. And they will put our members’ jobs at risk.

    “For decades, we have witnessed the erosion of millions of well-paying, high-skilled U.S. and Canadian jobs as corporations outsourced production to countries with lax labor standards. The administration’s trade policies will accelerate this decline, outsourcing thousands of IAM Union aerospace and defense jobs into low-wage positions. 

    “We cannot stand idly by while reckless policies destroy our supply chains, destabilize economies, and imperil the livelihoods of tens of thousands of workers, including over 100,000 aerospace workers across both nations. This administration’s isolationist approach ignores the interconnected nature of the U.S. and Canadian economies and national security.

    “Our union continues to emphasize the urgent need for a collaborative and strategic approach to tariffs. This approach must involve government, business, and labor unions and develop a comprehensive strategy that strengthens and expands critical sectors in the U.S. and Canada. 

    “Workers must be part of the solution to ensure that trade policies benefit our communities, not multinational corporations seeking to exploit cheap labor abroad.

    “The IAM Union pledges to fight against these harmful tariffs, vowing to prevent a repeat of past trade failures that resulted in widespread economic devastation and increased risks to national security.

    Share and Follow:

    MIL OSI USA News –

    April 2, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Attorney General Bonta Files Lawsuit Against Trump Administration Over Unlawful Termination of $11 Billion in Critical Public Health Funding

    Source: US State of California

    9th lawsuit against Trump Administration argues that abrupt termination of federal funds is unlawful 

    Funding was appropriated by Congress in response to COVID-19 pandemic to ensure that U.S. is better prepared for future public health threats 

    OAKLAND — California Attorney General Rob Bonta today announced co-leading a coalition of 23 states and the District of Columbia in filing a lawsuit against the Trump Administration’s U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. over the unlawful termination of $11 billion in critical public health funding. Beginning on March 24, 2025, HHS abruptly, with no advance notice or warning, issued termination notices to state and local public health agencies across the country, purporting to end federal funding for grants that provide essential support for a wide range of urgent public health needs, including identifying, tracking, and addressing infectious diseases; ensuring access to immunizations; and modernizing critical public health infrastructure. The federal funding was appropriated by Congress to ensure the United States is better prepared for future public health threats. Filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island, the lawsuit by the attorneys general alleges that the termination notices are unlawful in several ways under the Administration Procedures Act (APA). The coalition is also seeking a temporary restraining order to maintain the status quo and immediately restore the public health funding due to the irreparable harm that their respective states and their local health jurisdictions would otherwise suffer. California stands to lose more than $972 million from these cancellations by HHS.

    “Over and over, I’ve made clear that my office will only take legal action against the Trump Administration when it breaks the law. Unfortunately, but predictably, that has happened once again,” said Attorney General Bonta. “Congress explicitly authorized funding for the grants at issue to help keep our country healthy and protect us from future pandemics. HHS and its Secretary, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., cannot unilaterally do away with that critical federal funding. My fellow attorneys general and I are committed to defending the rule of law. We know how high the stakes are in our respective states — thousands of jobs and key public health programs and initiatives could be eliminated.” 

    According to the Trump Administration, funding for the grants is “no longer necessary” because the grants were appropriated through one or more COVID-19 related laws, and the COVID-19 pandemic is over. In the lawsuit, the attorneys general allege: 

    • The termination notices violate the APA because they are contrary to law. The foreseeable end of the COVID-19 pandemic is not a lawful basis to terminate “for cause.” Terminations “for cause” are only permissible based on a grant recipient’s “material failure” to comply with the applicable terms and conditions of the grants and agreements. The Trump Administration has never alleged, much less demonstrated, any failure by the fund recipients to comply with the applicable terms and conditions of the grants and agreements. In addition, federal law requires the HHS Secretary to “provide to the State involved adequate notice and an opportunity for a hearing” prior to terminating Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) grants, which fund mental health and substance abuse services. HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. provided absolutely no notice or opportunity for a hearing before terminating the grants, effective immediately.
    • The termination notices further violate the APA because they are arbitrary and capricious. Among other things, they assumed, with no legal or factual support, that all appropriations in COVID-19 related laws were only intended for use during the pandemic. In fact, HHS granted numerous extensions to the performance period of many grants issued to Plaintiff States and their local health jurisdictions, some of which were scheduled to end as late as June 2027. The termination notices are also arbitrary and capricious because they failed to undertake any individualized assessments of the grants or cooperative agreements, including any analysis of the benefits of this public health funding or the dire consequences of termination. 
    • The Trump Administration’s unlawful withholding of funds has already caused substantial confusion and will result in immediate and devastating harm to their states, their local health jurisdictions, their residents, and public health writ large.

    Without this essential public health funding, vital programs that serve millions of Californians, including children, rural communities, and nursing homes, will be jeopardized. For example, the federal government terminated over $800 million that the California Department of Public Health intended to use, in part, to vaccinate 4.5 million children statewide and assist hospitals in directing injured and ill patients to available health facilities during all types of emergencies, where efficient routing saves lives. The California Department of Health Care Services is set to lose over $119 million, which the state needs to support key programs, including substance use disorder prevention and early intervention services for youth in at least 18 counties. And the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health will lose over $45 million that was slated, in part, to strengthen the County’s efforts to prevent the spread of measles, and seasonal and avian influenza. 

    Attorney General Bonta is co-leading the litigation with the attorneys general of Colorado, Minnesota, Rhode Island, and Washington. They are joined by the attorneys general of Arizona, Connecticut, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, and Wisconsin, as well as the Governors of Kentucky and Pennsylvania. 

    A copy of the complaint is available here. 

    MIL OSI USA News –

    April 2, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: CentralReach Named to Inc. Magazine’s 2025 List of Fastest-Growing Private Companies in the Southeast for 5th Time

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Fort Lauderdale, FL, April 01, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — CentralReach, a leading provider of Autism and IDD Care software for ABA, multidisciplinary, and special education, today was named to the Inc. Regionals: Southeast list, the most prestigious ranking of the fastest-growing private companies in the Southeast, which includes South Carolina, Kentucky, Tennessee, Georgia, Arkansas, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, Florida, and Puerto Rico. An extension of the national Inc. 5000 list, the Regionals offer a unique look at the most successful companies within the Southeast economy’s most dynamic segment–its independent small businesses.

    CentralReach provides a leading software and services platform to help children and adults diagnosed with autism and related IDDs – and those who serve them – unlock potential, achieve better outcomes, and live more independent lives. The company offers purpose-built solutions for all the settings where care and learning are provided – in homes, clinics, schools, and the workplace.

    The companies on this list show a remarkable rate of growth across all industries in the Southeast. Between 2021 and 2023, these 192 private companies had a median growth rate of 114 percent; by 2023, they’d also added 11,493 jobs and $8.1 billion to the region’s economy.

    “The honorees on this year’s Inc. Regionals list are true trailblazers driving economic growth in their respective regions, industries, and beyond. This list celebrates their achievements and tells the stories of remarkable companies that are fueling growth and adding jobs in local economies throughout the country,” said Bonny Ghosh, editorial director at Inc.

    Inc. has also recognized CentralReach in several of its other awards programs including naming the company a Best in Business honoree for the last two years, Best Workplace for the last three years, and an Inc. 5000 honoree for the last five years. 

    For the complete results of this year’s Inc. Regionals: Southeast winners, including company profiles, visit: https://www.inc.com/regionals/southeast.

    About CentralReach

    CentralReach is a leading provider of autism and IDD care software, providing a complete, end-to-end software and services platform that helps children and adults diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and related intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) – and those who serve them – unlock potential, achieve better outcomes, and live more independent lives. With its roots in Applied Behavior Analysis, the company is revolutionizing how the lifelong journey of autism and IDD care is enabled at home, school, and work with powerful and intuitive solutions purpose-built for each care setting.

    Trusted by more than 200,000 professionals globally, CentralReach is committed to ongoing product advancement, market-leading industry expertise, world-class client satisfaction, and support of the autism and IDD community to propel autism and IDD care into a new era of excellence. For more information, please visit CentralReach.com or follow us on LinkedIn and Facebook.

    About Inc.

    Inc. is the leading media brand and playbook for the entrepreneurs and business leaders shaping our future. Through its journalism, Inc. aims to inform, educate, and elevate the profile of its community: the risk-takers, the innovators, and the ultra-driven go-getters who are creating the future of business. Inc. is published by Mansueto Ventures LLC, along with fellow leading business publication Fast Company. For more information, visit www.inc.com.

    The MIL Network –

    April 2, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: Phorcys Capital Partners Acquires Hunt Trace Senior Living, Expanding Senior Living Exposure to Florida

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    ALPHARETTA, Ga., April 01, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Phorcys Capital Partners, LLC (“Phorcys”) is pleased to announce the acquisition of Hunt Trace Senior Living (“Hunt Trace”), a 114-unit assisted living community located just west of Orlando in Clermont, Florida. The community was acquired through a court-appointed receivership sale for an undisclosed amount.

    “Hunt Trace represented a compelling opportunity to acquire a stabilized asset at a level well below replacement in a high-growth Florida market,” said Vasileios Sfyris, Managing Partner at Phorcys. “We are excited to partner with Impact Senior Living to improve upon the already excellent care and comfort offered at the community.”

    Originally built in 2002 and expanded in 2014, Hunt Trace sits on six acres and includes both assisted living and memory care services. The community maintains a strong reputation within the market, recently winning a “Best of 2025” award from the South Lake Chamber of Commerce. Phorcys Capital Partners plans to invest approximately $1.5 million in the community over the next year to modernize the plant.

    “Phorcys Capital Partners brings a strong vision and an ownership mindset that truly supports long-term operational success,” said Andrew Hendry, Vice President of Operations for Impact Senior Living. “At Hunt Trace, that translates into a collaborative environment where innovation and resident satisfaction remain top priorities.”

    Hunt Trace Senior Living is the latest addition to Phorcys’s growing senior housing platform, which has now invested over $125 million in the sector. Phorcys anticipates additional acquisitions this year through its unique sourcing platform to acquire senior living assets at an attractive basis.

    “We continue to see significant opportunity in the senior housing space,” added Sfyris. “The promising tailwinds in the sector should allow us to generate very attractive risk-adjusted returns for our investors for the foreseeable future.”

    About Phorcys Capital Partners
    Phorcys is an alternative asset manager, with a focus on investing in distressed municipal bonds and/or acquiring the underlying assets secured by municipal bonds. Phorcys strategically invests in a diverse range of sectors, including senior living, multifamily housing, student housing, and hospitality. Since its inception, the firm has invested approximately $425 million across all sectors.

    For more information, contact:
    Phorcys Capital Partners
    Matt Doss
    770-777-9373
    mdoss@phorcyscp.com

    A photo accompanying this announcement is available at https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/cb2707e9-0908-4872-84a5-d8721e60f3d2

    The MIL Network –

    April 2, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: FS Bancorp, Inc. and 1st Security Bank Announce the Promotion of Phillip Whittington to Chief Financial Officer

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    MOUNTLAKE TERRACE, Wash., April 01, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — FS Bancorp, Inc. (“Company”) (NASDAQ: FSBW), the holding company for 1st Security Bank of Washington (“1st Security Bank” or “Bank”) announced today that it has named Phillip Whittington as Chief Financial Officer of both the Bank and the Company effective May 1, 2025. Matthew D. Mullet, who previously served as Chief Financial Officer and President will continue to serve as the President for both the Company and the Bank.

    “We are delighted to announce Phil’s promotion to Chief Financial Officer,” said Joe Adams the Bank’s CEO. “I am confident his knowledge of the Bank’s accounting, treasury management and financial reporting requirements makes him the ideal person for this position.”

    Phillip Whittington has served as the Controller of the Bank since January 2020. Prior to joining 1st Security Bank, he was as a manager at the accounting firm of Elliott Davis located in Columbia, South Carolina. Mr. Whittington, a Certified Public Accountant, received his Bachelor of Science in Accounting from the College of Charleston and his Master of Accountancy from the University of South Carolina.

    About 1st Security Bank of Washington

    1st Security Bank offers a range of loan and deposit services primarily to small- and middle-market businesses and individuals in Washington and Oregon. It operates through twenty-seven Bank branches, and one headquarters office that provide loan and deposit services, and loan production offices in various suburban communities in the greater Puget Sound area, the Kennewick-Pasco-Richland metropolitan area of Washington, also known as the Tri-Cities, and in Vancouver, Washington. Additionally, the Bank services home mortgage customers throughout the Northwest predominantly in Washington State including Puget Sound, Tri-Cities and Vancouver.

    Note Regarding Forward Looking Statements

    This press release includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, which can be identified by words such as “may,” “expected,” “anticipate”, “continue,” or other comparable words. In addition, all statements other than statements of historical facts that address activities that 1st Security expects or anticipates will or may occur in the future are forward-looking statements. Readers are encouraged to read the Securities and Exchange Commission reports of FS Bancorp, particularly its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, for meaningful cautionary language discussing why actual results may vary materially from those anticipated by management.

    Contacts:

    Joseph C. Adams
    Chief Executive Officer

    Matthew D. Mullet
    President and Chief Financial Officer
    (425) 771-5299
    www.FSBWA.com

    The MIL Network –

    April 2, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Luján, Colleagues Urge AG Bondi to Appoint A Special Counsel to Investigate Trump Administration Signal Chat National Security Breach

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Ben Ray Luján (D-New Mexico)
    Washington, D.C. – U.S. Senator Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.) joined U.S. Senate Democratic Whip Dick Durbin (D-IL), Ranking Member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY), and 28 Senate Democrats in urging Attorney General Pam Bondi to appoint a Special Counsel to thoroughly and impartially investigate whether any of the government officials involved in the Signal chat security breach violated federal criminal law. On March 24, The Atlantic’s editor in chief reported that President Trump’s National Security Advisor Michael Waltz had included him in a group text chain with several high-ranking national security officials where highly sensitive, classified, or controlled information was shared and discussed over Signal—an unsecure commercial messaging app.
    “In addition to the reckless inclusion of a journalist in the chat, we are deeply concerned about this serious breach in the proper handling of such information and deliberations,” the Senators wrote. “Appointment of a Special Counsel is appropriate where the Department may have a conflict of interest or extraordinary circumstances are present, a criminal investigation is warranted, and it is in the public interest to appoint an outside Special Counsel to investigate the matter. Such circumstances are clearly present here.”
    The Signal chat group started by Mr. Waltz included Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, and Central Intelligence Agency Director John Ratcliffe, among at least 18 other high-ranking government officials. In addition to discussing the sensitive foreign policy implications of military strikes against Houthi targets in Yemen, these officials proceeded to discuss key operational information regarding the precise timing of the planned attacks, the types of military aircraft and munitions to be used, and the targets and results of the strikes as they occurred. An unprecedented security breach of this magnitude involving top senior government officials presents the kind of extraordinary circumstances clearly contemplated by the Special Counsel regulations.
    “These officials conducted a highly sensitive discussion, including of clearly classified or controlled information, over the commercial messaging app Signal, including in some instances on personal devices and while traveling in foreign countries, rather than using the secure U.S. government channels and facilities that are designed and required for the sharing of such information. Despite subsequent claims to the contrary by you, President Trump, and several of the officials involved, including in testimony before Congress, some of the information they shared and discussed over Signal would almost certainly be considered classified or, at a minimum, controlled, prior to and in the immediate aftermath of an impending strike,” the Senators wrote.
    In the letter, the Senators raised concerns if the Signal chat violated federal law. For example, gross negligence in handling national defense information may violate the Espionage Act. Importantly, other laws, including the Federal Records Act, require the preservation of certain government records. Destruction of government records or property may constitute a violation of various criminal statutes. Subsequent statements to Congress and testimony before the Houseand Senate Intelligence Committees by several of the officials involved raise additional concerns about potential violations of federal criminal laws that prohibit making false statements to Congress, committing perjury in testimony to Congress, inducing another person to commit perjury, or conspiring to commit any of the foregoing actions.
    “During your confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee, you assured the American people that everyone will be held to ‘an equal, fair system of justice’ if you were confirmed as Attorney General, and that ‘no one is above the law.’ As the individuals most seriously implicated in this incident include senior officials at the highest levels, including several of your fellow cabinet members, appointment of a Special Counsel is necessary to ensure that the investigation and any ensuing prosecutions are fair, impartial, and independent and that no official, regardless of seniority or political affiliation, is above the law. The people of this country deserve the assurance that this matter will be taken seriously and addressed swiftly. To do so, we urge you to appoint a Special Counsel immediately,” the Senators concluded.
    The letter was also signed by U.S. Senators Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), Cory Booker (D-NJ), Adam Schiff (D-CA), Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), Tammy Duckworth (D-IL), Tim Kaine (D-VA), Peter Welch (D-VT), Jack Reed (D-RI), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Andy Kim (D-NJ), Jacky Rosen (D-NV), Chris Coons (D-DE), Mazie Hirono (D-HI), Tina Smith (D-MN), Lisa Blunt Rochester (D-DE), Raphael Warnock (D-GA), Chris Van Hollen (D-MD), Alex Padilla (D-CA), Tammy Baldwin (D-WI), John Fetterman (D-PA), Elissa Slotkin (D-MI), Patty Murray (D-WA), Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY),  Ed Markey (D-MA), Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), Ruben Gallego (D-AZ), and Gary Peters (D-MI).
    Full text of the letter is available here and below:
    Dear Attorney General Bondi:
    On March 24, The Atlantic’s editor in chief reported that President Trump’s National Security Advisor Michael Waltz had included him in a group message chain with several high-ranking national security officials where highly sensitive, classified, or controlled information was shared and discussed over Signal—an unsecure commercial messaging app. In addition to the reckless inclusion of a journalist in the chat, we are deeply concerned about this serious breach in the proper handling of such information and deliberations. Given the extraordinary circumstances of this shocking incident and the significant public interests at stake, it is imperative that you immediately appoint a Special Counsel to thoroughly and impartially investigate whether any of the government officials involved violated federal criminal law.
    Appointment of a Special Counsel is appropriate where the Department may have a conflict of interest or extraordinary circumstances are present, a criminal investigation is warranted, and it is in the public interest to appoint an outside Special Counsel to investigate the matter. Such circumstances are clearly present here.
    The Signal chat group started by Mr. Waltz included Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, and Central Intelligence Agency Director John Ratcliffe, among at least 18 other high-ranking government officials. In addition to discussing the sensitive foreign policy implications of military strikes against Houthi targets in Yemen, these officials proceeded to discuss key operational information regarding the precise timing of the planned attacks, the types of military aircraft and munitions to be used, and the targets and results of the strikes as they occurred. An unprecedented security breach of this magnitude involving top senior government officialspresents the kind of extraordinary circumstances clearly contemplated by the Special Counsel regulations.
    These officials conducted a highly sensitive discussion, including of clearly classified or controlled information, over the commercial messaging app Signal, including in some instances on personal devices and while traveling in foreign countries, rather than using the secure U.S. government channels and facilities that are designed and required for the sharing of such information. Despite subsequent claims to the contrary by you, President Trump, and several of the officials involved, including in testimony before Congress, some of the information they shared and discussed over Signal would almost certainly be considered classified or, at a minimum, controlled, prior to and in the immediate aftermath of an impending strike.
    These shockingly reckless breaches of security protocols for safeguarding sensitive and classified information clearly warrant an investigation into whether any of the government officials involved violated federal laws pertaining to the proper safeguarding and preservation of such information. For example, gross negligence in handling national defense information may violate the Espionage Act. Importantly, other laws, including the Federal Records Act, require the preservation of certain government records. Signal allows users to schedule messages for deletion after certain time periods and Mr. Waltz appears to have set the chat messages to delete initially after one week and then later in the chat changed the setting to delete messages after four weeks. Destruction of government records or property may constitute a violation of various criminal statutes. Subsequent statements to Congress and testimony before the House and Senate Intelligence Committeesby several of the officials involved raise additional concerns about potential violations of federal criminal laws that prohibit making false statements to Congress, committing perjury in testimony to Congress, inducing another person to commit perjury, or conspiring to commit any of the foregoing actions.
    Even prior to his first Administration, President Trump campaigned for the need to prosecute and “lock up” individuals who allegedly “bypass government security” or “sent and received classified information on an insecure server.” Further, as an avowedly loyal and zealous advocate for the President, you echoed these same sentiments prior to your confirmation. Given the extraordinary nature of this security breach by senior Trump Administration officials, the likelihood that these actions needlessly endangered American lives and our nation’s security, the importance of putting our nation’s security before partisan political interests, and the range of federal criminal laws that may have been violated, it is imperative that the Department of Justice conduct a thorough investigation to assess the extent of the damage and determine whether any criminal charges are warranted against any of the government officials involved.
    During your confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee, you assured the American people that everyone will be held to “an equal, fair system of justice” if you were confirmed as Attorney General, and that “no one is above the law.” As the individuals most seriously implicated in this incident include senior officials at the highest levels, including several of your fellow cabinet members, appointment of a Special Counsel is necessary to ensure that the investigation and any ensuing prosecutions are fair, impartial, and independent and that no official, regardless of seniority or political affiliation, is above the law.
    The people of this country deserve the assurance that this matter will be taken seriously and addressed swiftly. To do so, we urge you to appoint a Special Counsel immediately.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    April 2, 2025
  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Puma’s final flypast27 Mar 2025

    Source: United Kingdom – Royal Air Force

    The flight was organised to honour its remarkable service.

    On 26 March RAF Benson waved off Puma helicopters for the last time as they embarked on their farewell flight around the UK. The Puma helicopter has been the work horse of the Royal Air Force for over five decades.

    Introduced into service in 1971, the Puma quickly became a key asset, known for its agility, speed, and versatility. Over the years, it has been deployed in various Operations and humanitarian missions.

    In recent history it has seen service in Kenya 2009 to 2011 where they supported UK exercises and in Afghanistan 2015 to 2021. It has also provided support in the Caribbean as a part of Operation RUMAN after Hurricane Irma in September 2017. During COVID it took part in Operation RESCRIPT in 2020, providing vital aid to those in need. Up until March 2025, it has been involved in enduring operations in Cyprus and Brunei.

    “This flight route is via various locations of significance.

    “Each place reflects the rich history and contributions that the Puma has made during its time in service. The aircraft has been a cornerstone of global Defence Operations for more than five decades. We want to celebrate its contribution to supporting our people around the world over the past 54 years.”

    Wing Commander Nick Monahan
    Officer Commanding 33 Squadron & Puma Force Commander

    To name a few, the Farewell Tour took the Puma to several key locations:

    • RAF Benson: The home base for the Puma fleet, RAF Benson, has been the heart of operations and training for these helicopters. The farewell flight’s first and final stop was a tribute to the countless hours of service and training conducted here.
    • Northern Ireland: The Puma played a crucial role during the Troubles, providing essential support and transport. The visit to Northern Ireland was a poignant reminder of the helicopter’s contributions to peacekeeping efforts.
    • Kensington Palace: To honour Prince Michael of Kent’s distinguished connection to RAF Benson and the Puma fleet.
    • Cranwell, Halton, Honington, Shawbury and Stanta training area: All sights of significance for the Aircrew that have intertwined history with the Helicopter.
    • Boscombe Down and Airbus Kidlington: Sites for significance for the maintenance and operational capabilities of the fleet.

    As the helicopter flew over these historic sites, it symbolised the end of an era and the beginning of a new chapter for the RAF. The Puma’s drawdown marks the transition to newer technologies, but its legacy will continue to inspire future generations of aviators. For those who have flown and engineered her for over 50 years this is a poignant moment and a chance to reflect on their dedication and service.

    The farewell flight was not just a goodbye but a celebration of the Puma’s remarkable journey and the countless lives it touched and saved over its distinguished career.

    “We recognise and celebrate the dedication of everyone who has served on or supported Puma operations over the last five decades”

    Wing Commander Alice Tierney
    Station Commander, RAF Benson

    MIL OSI United Kingdom –

    April 2, 2025
  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: The last surviving Battle of Britain Pilot, John ‘Paddy’ Hemingway DFC, passes awayJohn “Paddy” Hemingway, the last surviving pilot of the Battle of Britain, has sadly passed away at the age of 105.17 Mar 2025

    Source: United Kingdom – Royal Air Force

    John “Paddy” Hemingway, the last surviving pilot of the iconic Battle of Britain, passed away peacefully on 17 March 2025 at the age of 105.

    Paddy Hemingway, one of a number known as ‘the Few’ and revered figures in British aviation history, played a crucial role in defending the United Kingdom against Nazi oppression during the summer of 1940. His courage in the face of overwhelming odds demonstrated his sense of duty and the importance of British resilience.

    Eighty-five years ago, a nineteen-year-old Royal Air Force Pilot Officer from Ireland, flew his Hurricane in the skies over France, providing fighter cover (strafing attacks, air patrols and dogfights) to the British Expeditionary Force and other allied troops as they retreated to the beaches of Dunkirk in the face of overwhelming Nazi Blitzkrieg attacks. It became known as the ‘Battle of France’.

    When the invasion of France commenced in May 1940, Paddy, a pilot with No. 85 Squadron, found himself locked in a bitter contest with the Luftwaffe. In an eleven-day period the squadron accounted for a confirmed total of 90 enemy aircraft; there were many more claims that could not be substantiated. On 10 May, Paddy was recorded as destroying a He-111, the following day he downed a Do-17 but his Hurricane aircraft was hit by anti-aircraft fire, and he had to make a forced landing. As the Germans advanced, it was clear the airfields would be overrun and the remaining pilots, aircraft and crews returned to the UK.

    No. 85 Squadron, under a new commanding officer, Peter Townsend, became one of the front-line squadrons of the 11 Group (Fighter Command) response to the daily attacks from Nazi aircraft, which came to be known as the ‘Battle of Britain’. Paddy’s logbook records, almost nonchalantly, the daily sorties he and the other pilots undertook in defence of the United Kingdom. In August 1940, during hectic dogfights, Paddy was twice forced to bail out of his Hurricane, landing in the sea off the coast of Essex and in marshland on the other occasion.

    Towards the end of the October 1940, the strain of fighting and loss of comrades was beginning to take its toll on Paddy. He was particularly troubled by the loss of his dear friend ‘Dickie’ Lee DSO, DFC in August 1940, saying in later years that his biggest regret was the loss of friends.

    On 1 July 1941, Paddy was awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC) and in September that year, he was Mentioned in Dispatches. His journey to London to receive his DFC from The King began with him escaping from a wrecked Blenheim aircraft which crashed on take-off.

    This wasn’t the last of his aircraft related misfortunes. In 1941, serving with No. 85 Squadron, based at RAF Hunsdon, in a Havoc night fighter, Paddy had to bail out at 600 feet due to instrument failure in bad weather, breaking his hand on the tail section. Paddy’s parachute failed to open properly, and he was saved further injury as the chute caught on the branches of a tree. In 1945, whilst serving in the Mediterranean Allied Air Forces with 324 Wing, he was forced to bail out a fourth time. While attacking enemy forces near Ravenna in April 1945, his Spitfire was hit multiple times by anti-aircraft fire. He parachuted into enemy territory and managed to contact Italian partisans, who helped him return to his squadron.

    John Allman ‘Paddy’ Hemingway was the last Battle of France and Battle of Britain (last of “The Few”) pilot. He never saw his role in the Battle of Britain as anything other than doing the job he was trained to do. He didn’t see it as an epoch-making moment in the history of the RAF or the United Kingdom.

    Paddy always had a twinkle in his eyes as he recalled the fun times with colleagues in France and London. This quiet, composed, thoughtful and mischievous individual may not have wanted to be the last of ‘The Few’, but he embodied the spirit of all those who flew sorties over this green and pleasant land. His passing marks the end of an era and a poignant reminder of the sacrifices made by those who fought for freedom during World War II.

    “It is with great sadness that I heard of the passing of John ‘Paddy’ Hemingway today. I am thankful that I was able to meet and spend time with him in Dublin, most recently in January this year. Paddy was an amazing character whose life story embodies all that was and remains great about the Royal Air Force. In his youth he travelled from Ireland to join the RAF and following the outbreak of World War II, was assigned to No. 85 Squadron in France, where he is recorded as destroying two enemy aircraft during the Battle for France, as well as flying supporting missions during the Battle of Dunkirk. He eventually retired from the RAF in 1969 as a Group Captain. Throughout his life he inspired those he knew and served with. My thoughts are with his family and all those who cared for him over the past few years.

    “This was a generation who understood the importance of service and comradeship. A generation who believed that with hard work, clarity of purpose and a determination to succeed, they would not lose. Their efforts and the efforts of all our personnel past & present are the bedrock on which the Royal Air Force maintains the security of the UK at home and abroad.  Their sense of duty and willingness to put others before themselves should inspire those who will build the next generation Air Force.”

    Air Chief Marshal Sir Rich Knighton
    Chief of the Air Staff

    MIL OSI United Kingdom –

    April 2, 2025
  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Council sets out options for future of Pimlico heat network | Westminster City Council

    Source: City of Westminster

    • Council to explore every option to ‘get this right for residents’ 

    Westminster City Council’s cabinet has set out the next steps in plans to update, replace and improve a heat network which serves thousands of Pimlico residents. 

    In recent months the council has been meeting with and speaking to the families and businesses set to be impacted by this project – listening to concerns and feedback about the existing network and its possible replacements.

    The Pimlico District Heating Undertaking (PDHU) is owned and managed by the council and supplies heat to over 3,000 homes, 50 commercial premises, three schools, and a post office.

    The system, which is the oldest district heating system in the UK, is facing significant challenges due to its age, including frequent leaks, high repair costs, and poor insulation with maintenance of the network now costing £3.5m each year and more in insurance.

    Following discussions with resident groups, taking on board their suggestions, as well as the views of others on the network the council has focused on possible solutions for further development and resident engagement. On Monday 31 March the council’s cabinet agreed to provide an additional £1.2m of funding to develop a scheme which works for residents.

    The options being considered for further development include:

    • Local Energy Source – Similar to the existing system, heating and hot water would be provided to PDHU customers from a centralised source of heat generated locally. Hot water is distributed into dwellings through a network of pipes.
    • Direct Electric Heating – The existing heat network would be decommissioned. Heating and hot water would be provided independently to individual dwellings or properties, with no requirement for hot water distribution through underground pipework or within communal areas.
    • Third Party Energy Source – Similar to the existing system, however heating and hot water would be provided to PDHU customers from a third party and purchased at an agreed price. Hot water is distributed into dwellings through a network of pipes.

    In response to feedback from residents the council has also agreed to explore the feasibility of a non-system solution.

    The short listed options will now be developed further, with residents involvement throughout.

    Westminster City Council Cabinet Member for Housing, Liza Begum said:

    We’ve got to get this right for residents. That’s why the council is fully exploring every option, making sure we  find a long term solution which keeps energy bills low and minimises the cost of construction and maintenance.

    “ We’re already working with local tenants, leaseholders and businesses who have helped shape the options we are developing. Their continued input is going to be vital if we are going to make the scheme work.”

    “The existing network is 70 years old and past its design life. Addressing the daily leaks and repairs issues, which have such a negative impact on the lives of people living on our estates, is a top priority. We want all of our residents to have a reliable, low cost, efficient, energy.”

    If residents have queries or feedback they can contact the council about the PDHU on: futureofpdhu@westminster.gov.uk

    To read more about the options under consideration you can read the cabinet papers here : Cabinet Report – Future of Pimlico District Heating Undertaking PDHU Progress on initial Outline.pdf

    MIL OSI United Kingdom –

    April 2, 2025
  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Libraries take another step in digital transformation with Wi-Fi printing

    Source: City of Stoke-on-Trent

    Published: Tuesday, 1st April 2025

    Wi-Fi printing is now available in libraries across Stoke-on-Trent – making it easier for residents to access printing facilities.

    The city council was awarded £300,000 from the Libraries Improvement Fund, which is funded via Arts Council England, and part of this project has involved improving the printing facilities across the city’s six libraries.

    There were 248,276 visits to the libraries in the years 2023/24 and the council is now on track to achieve its target of 250,000 this financial year. Improving library facilities is an important step forward in helping the city’s residents make full use of the library spaces they are using daily.

    By having Wi-Fi printing, users will now be able to print from their own device instead of relying on computer libraries and documents will be available to collect from any library.

    Customer experience will be easier and quicker and it will be a source of support for people who do not have access to printing at home.

    Councillor Alastair Watson, cabinet member for financial sustainability and corporate services at Stoke-on-Trent City Council, said: “I am pleased to see these improvements to our library printing facilities come to fruition thanks to this grant funding.

    “By installing Wi-Fi printing, it forms part of our digital transformation by providing extra support to those without printing at home, whilst freeing up staff time, so they assist customers who struggle with I.T. I hope residents make good use of these facilities and keep enjoying the library space.”

    Wi-Fi printing in libraries will be available from Tuesday, 1 April 2025. Library staff are on hand to support anyone that needs assistance.

    Any customer wanting to access Wi-Fi from home printing can visit www.stoke.gov.uk/printatyourlibrary. Customers then sign in using their library card details. Once logged in they can book to use a computer in a library or send their documents to print in any Stoke-on-Trent library.

    MIL OSI United Kingdom –

    April 2, 2025
  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Vacant Properties Taskforce push leads to former Brewbakers building success

    Source: City of Wolverhampton

    The owners must now carry out compliance works to the building, on the approach to Wolverhampton city centre, soon or risk facing further fines.

    It is part of a crackdown by the Vacant Properties Taskforce to encourage owners of empty properties to properly maintain them and actively bring them back into use.

    Jagir Singh, Jaswant Singh and Kalwant Singh, all of Ednam Road, Goldthorn Hill, Wolverhampton, were found guilty of not complying with a Section 215 notice (Town and Country Planning Act 1990), at Dudley Magistrates Court on Wednesday 26 March.

    Each defendant was fined £660 and ordered to pay a victim surcharge of £264 and costs of £495 – totalling £4,257.

    Compliance works include replacing the existing boards over the windows, repairing all damaged, missing and broken doors, removal of all vegetation from the building and rubbish from the site, cleaning all graffiti from the doors and brickwork, and fixing rainwater goods to ensure discharge of rainwater without leaks.

    The Presiding Justice considered the former Brewbakers building to be an outstanding building and should be brought back into use.

    City of Wolverhampton Council Leader, Councillor Stephen Simkins, said: “Despite not being the owner of the site, the council is determined to see the former Brewbakers building brought back to life, so it brings jobs, opportunities and investment to Wolverhampton.

    “That is exactly why my administration launched the Vacant Properties Taskforce – to tackle dishevelled, vacant commercial properties, left by landlords to blight our streets.

    “The benefits of reusing empty buildings and developing vacant sites are considerable, including the provision of new jobs and homes. It helps attract investment to an area, lifts its character and appearance, reduces anti social behaviour and can help boost the wellbeing of residents, workers and visitors.

    “The Vacant Properties Taskforce has a mandate to monitor these buildings, ensure they are well maintained as a minimum, and look to bring some important and iconic properties back into use.”

    MIL OSI United Kingdom –

    April 2, 2025
  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Government urged to act as Scotland goes wrong way on fuel poverty

    Source: Scottish Greens

    01 Apr 2025 Climate

    The SNP must recommit to the Heat in Buildings Bill to ensure warmer, greener homes and cut bills.

    More in Climate

    The Scottish Government must re-commit to its Heat in Buildings Bill and focus on improving the energy efficiency of our homes and changing to clean heating systems, says Scottish Green Co-leader Patrick Harvie.

    Mr Harvie’s comments come amidst speculation that the Bill, which was originally scheduled to be introduced last November, is to be watered down or dropped entirely. This follows a Ministerial statement on fuel poverty that showed Scotland is going in the wrong direction.

    Mr Harvie said:

    “The cost of living crisis hasn’t gone away, with the UK Government cutting social security and the Scottish Government approving rent hikes. This would have been a great time to show real leadership in cutting energy bills. But that leadership is sadly lacking.

    “The Statement on fuel poverty shows that Scotland is moving in the wrong direction. The Minister recognises that the energy crisis of recent years and the rise in fuel poverty are directly driven by volatile fossil fuel prices.

    “Yet this Statement is coming just two days before the SNP are expected to dilute, delay or even scrap the Heat in Buildings Bill, which is the only serious proposal they had to end Scotland’s over-reliance on gas for heating.

    “The Greens have long tried to push the Government to go further and faster on fuel poverty and green heating. Even if they had taken the actions we called for back in 2009, when the budget fell because of their lack of ambition on energy efficiency, people would have been better protected from the recent price hikes.

    “For a brief period, the SNP seemed to accept that failure on both fuel poverty and climate change meant they had to go further and faster. Now, they are admitting that fuel poverty is on the rise, but at the same time actually slowing down the action that’s needed.”

    MIL OSI United Kingdom –

    April 2, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: Greenbacker delivers 2024 results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Key Takeaways

    • Amid challenging market conditions, including inflationary pressures and macro uncertainty, Greenbacker announces decrease in NAV.
    • Charles Wheeler retires as CEO; Dan de Boer assumes position of interim CEO; Robert Brennan appointed Chairman of the Board.
    • Company institutes additional cost saving measures, including 10% reduction in workforce; operating expenses expected to reduce by $12 million, or 20%, by 2026.
    • Board of Directors authorizes review of strategic alternatives to enhance shareholder value.
    • Total operating revenue in 2024 increased by 16% year-over-year, to $210 million.
    • Operating fleet grew by 8%, with 22 new solar energy assets in operation representing 117 MW of additional power production capacity.
    • Annual power production increase of 23% driven by new solar assets combined with Company’s milestone wind repowers.
    • Greenbacker’s fleet of clean energy assets generated 2.7 billion kilowatt-hours of power, enough to power 250,000 US homes.

    NEW YORK, April 01, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Greenbacker Renewable Energy Company LLC (“Greenbacker,” “GREC,” or the “Company”), an energy transition-focused investment manager and independent power producer, has announced financial results for 2024, including year-over-year increases in annual revenue, operating capacity, and clean energy generation.¹

    Market conditions, inflationary pressures, and re-underwriting process determined adjusted NAV

    With the renewable energy sector at a critical juncture, during 2024 Greenbacker initiated a detailed, multi-quarter re-underwriting process prior to releasing its December 31, 2024 net asset value (“NAV”), in which the Company evaluated the expected future performance of the assets in its portfolio relative to their historical performance, while also taking into account the impact of current market conditions. As a result, GREC adjusted its aggregate NAV as of December 31, 2024 to $5.03 per share, a 35.5% decrease relative to the September 30, 2024 NAV of $7.81 per share.

    Several factors contributed to the Company’s NAV revision. Inflationary pressures, supply chain imbalances, and increasing insurance costs due to heightened climate risk contributed to a significant increase in operating costs. New clean energy generation projections from independent engineers based on recent industry data have provided additional insight, replacing earlier projections that had been obtained during a period with limited historical data available and diverged relative to actual production. Additionally, there continues to be uncertainty around potential changes to the Inflation Reduction Act and the threat of additional tariffs, both of which are impacting the near-term outlook for renewables.

    These headwinds contributed to a challenging market environment and downward pressure in renewable energy asset pricing across the sector, which Greenbacker saw reflected through both market sale processes and a comprehensive asset-by asset-review.

    At the project level, the Company continues to maintain financial stability, resulting in strong financial coverage ratios. Additionally, at the firm level, Greenbacker continues to maintain sufficient overall liquidity and receive ongoing support from its leading project financing partners.

    Organizational restructuring executed to increase operational efficiencies

    Greenbacker is announcing an organizational restructuring designed to streamline operations, reduce costs, and better position the Company to capitalize on future market opportunities and deliver value to shareholders.

    As part of these changes, Charles Wheeler is retiring from his role as Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chairman of the Greenbacker Board of Directors (“Board”), effective April 1, 2025. Chief Investment Officer and Head of Infrastructure Dan de Boer has been named interim CEO, effective April 1, 2025, and Director Robert Brennan has been appointed Chairman of the Board. The Greenbacker Board is considering both external and internal candidates for the role of a permanent CEO, which is expected to be confirmed no later than the end of Q2 2025. Wheeler will continue to serve as a member of the Board until the earlier of December 31, 2025 and the date on which a permanent replacement CEO has been appointed.

    Wheeler, who is also one of Greenbacker’s Co-Founders, spoke about his retirement and Greenbacker’s future:

    “14 years ago, with a group of like-minded individuals, I created Greenbacker with the goal of providing an investment vehicle that would enable ordinary American investors to participate in the renewable energy revolution. We’ve built Greenbacker into a business that is contributing to the transition to clean energy with hundreds of projects representing more than 3.6 gigawatts² of clean power generation capacity across the country.

    Given current market conditions, changes are needed to best position Greenbacker to benefit from future market opportunities. I believe that Dan and Greenbacker’s other leaders are the right team to guide us through this period while promoting our mission to empower a sustainable world.”

    De Boer has been with Greenbacker since 2023 and brings nearly two decades of experience in private equity and renewable energy investing, with prior leadership roles and positions at Allianz Capital Partners, Onyx Renewable Partners within Blackstone Energy Partners, and D.E. Shaw Renewable Investments.

    In addition to restructuring the leadership team, the Company has progressed several cost savings initiatives, including a reduction of approximately 10% of its workforce, effective March 31, 2025. Greenbacker anticipates that the reduction in force and other operational efficiency efforts that began in mid-2024 will reduce overhead expenses by $12 million, or 20%, by 2026.

    “We want to recognize the impact that this decision has on the careers and lives of the individuals at Greenbacker,” said interim CEO, Dan de Boer. “We value our people and employed care and thoughtfulness as we attempted to balance our business requirements with any adverse impact to our team. While difficult, we believe that taking these measures will better position the firm to achieve long-term growth.”

    Additionally, the Company has identified opportunities to recycle capital within the portfolio by pursuing targeted non-core asset sales.

    Annual total operating revenue topped $210 million, as Company continued to move assets into operation, contributing to year-over-year production increase of 23%

    During 2024, Greenbacker increased total operating revenue³ by $29 million, or 16% year-over-year, to over $210 million.

    Revenue from the sale of clean energy within Greenbacker’s independent power producer (“IPP”) business segment totaled $185.2 million in 2024, of which $155.0 million, or approximately 84%, came from the Company’s long-term power purchase agreements (“PPAs”).

    For 2024, the net loss attributable to Greenbacker was $(242.3) million and Adjusted EBTIDA⁴ was $59.8 million, representing year-over-year changes of (205)% and 88%, respectively. The net loss was primarily the result of goodwill impairment charges, driven by a deterioration in macroeconomic conditions, as well as by depreciation, amortization, and other impairment charges in the period.

    GREC increased its operating fleet size by 8% in 2024, which included placing 22 new solar energy assets into operation, accounting for 117 MW of additional power production.⁵ Additionally, the three wind assets strategically taken offline during portions of 2023 for repowering (i.e., retrofitting with new, more efficient equipment) had all returned to full operation producing power by early 2024.

    In total, GREC’s new operating solar assets and repowered wind portfolio drove an annual power production increase of 23% year-over-year,⁶ as the Company’s fleet of clean energy assets generated 2.7 billion kilowatt-hours of power, enough to power over 250,000 US homes.⁷

    GREC Operating Fleet 2024 2023 YoY Increase
    (total)
    YoY Increase
    (%)
    Clean power produced by solar assets (MWh) 1,504,580 1,256,183 248,397 20%
    PPA revenue generated by solar assets ($M) $ 87.8 $ 74.1 $ 13.6 18%
    Clean power produced by wind assets (MWh) 1,236,431 978,236 258,195 26%
    PPA revenue generated by wind assets ($M) $ 65.8 $ 53.9 $ 11.9 22%
    Total clean power generated by wind and solar assets (MWh) 2,741,011 2,234,419 506,592 23%
    Total PPA operating revenue generated by wind and solar assets ($M) $ 153.5 $ 128.0 $ 25.5 20%

    Some figures may not add to stated totals due to rounding. Total clean power generated does not include power generated from biomass facility during 2023 and a portion of 2024, nor does it include assets in which the Company holds a preferred equity position.

    Greenbacker secures nearly $1 billion financing for largest solar farm in New York State; completes $437 million financing for milestone wind repowers; and completes targeted non-core asset sale

    Throughout 2024, Greenbacker made substantial progress on one of its core objectives: securing the capital necessary for the construction of its remaining pre-operating assets—and converting those projects into revenue-generating operating assets selling electricity. The Company also continued to receive robust support from its project finance partners, enabling it to reach significant milestones over the year.

    In particular, Greenbacker secured nearly $1 billion in financing for the acquisition, construction and operation of its 674 MW Cider solar farm, the largest solar energy project in the state of New York to date. Cider also represents both Greenbacker’s largest clean energy asset to date and the largest project financing in Company history (for which it was awarded Proximo Infrastructure’s 2024 Solar Deal of the Year).

    The construction financing represented $869 million from six of the world’s top financial institutions, including ongoing Greenbacker partners MUFG, KeyBanc Capital Markets and Wells Fargo, as well as first-time partnerships with ING Capital LLC, Intesa Sanpaolo S.p.A., New York Branch and Societe Generale. The Company also closed on an $81 million development loan with Voya Investment Management, its first partnership with the global investment manager.

    Greenbacker additionally completed $437 million in financing for its wind repower portfolio. GREC was able to create additional value from existing assets by updating the turbine blades, hubs, and nacelles at three wind projects in its Midwestern fleet. To finance the repowering, the Company collaborated with lending partner Bayerische Landesbank to secure $81.5 million in construction bridge loan facilities, as well as long-term debt and tax equity financing from Huntington National Bank, via sales leasebacks totaling $355.7 million.

    Also in 2024, Greenbacker completed the sale of its 54 MW Panther Creek pre-operating wind asset to an affiliated sustainable infrastructure-focused platform. The asset sale illustrated GREC’s ability to develop large clean energy assets through late-stage development, a key component of its go-forward strategy, while its affiliate platform viewed the project as an opportunity to add a fully developed, high cash-yielding asset, in line with its investment mandate.

    Long-term contracted cash flows with investment-grade counterparties

    As of December 31, 2024, the Greenbacker operating fleet represented approximately 1.6 gigawatts of total clean power generation and storage capacity, spanning over 30 states, territories, districts and provinces. Due to its size and geographic footprint, GREC’s operating fleet was listed among Solarplaza’s 2025 Top 50 Operating Solar Portfolios in North America.

    At the end of 2024, over 93% of Greenbacker’s entire portfolio of operating and pre-operating clean energy projects were currently, or will be when completed, selling power to investment-grade counterparties, including utilities, municipalities, and corporations, under long-term power purchase agreements (“PPAs”). The portfolio had approximately 17.4 years of contracted cash flows associated with these PPAs.

    Review of strategic alternatives

    In addition to the other measures to reduce costs, operate more efficiently, and promote a path to better outcomes for its investors, the Greenbacker Board has authorized the Company to conduct a comprehensive review of strategic alternatives.

    In regard to this review, the Board will consider a full range of operational and financial alternatives. A strategic review may result in Greenbacker securing additional capital to continue executing on its business plan: acquiring, owning, and operating a fleet of sustainable infrastructure assets that the Company efficiently manages to create both value and potential liquidity options for its shareholders.

    “During 2024, Greenbacker closed on the Cider deal, completed our milestone wind repowers, and brought 117 MW of additional capacity online, showcasing how we can utilize additional capital while continuing to deliver on our core focus,” de Boer said. “We believe current valuations in the renewables sector do not align with the supportive fundamentals driving the energy transition, leading to a compelling inflection point for renewable infrastructure investment. In short: we believe this is one of the better times to be investing in the energy transition.”

    Company’s investments produce power, abate carbon emissions, conserve water, and support green jobs

    As of December 31, 2024, Greenbacker’s clean energy assets had cumulatively produced more than 11 million MWh of clean power since January 2016, abating over 7 million metric tons of carbon⁸ and saving nearly 8 billion gallons of water.⁹ Greenbacker’s fleet of operating and pre-operating projects currently support, or are expected to support, thousands of green jobs.¹⁰

    Additional information regarding the Company’s impact can also be found in Greenbacker’s latest impact report.

    Forward-Looking Statements
    This press release contains forward-looking statements, including those that relate to our search for a permanent Chief Executive Officer, our strategy and initiatives and our expectations for growth, within the meaning of the federal securities laws. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results to differ materially from those anticipated at the time the forward-looking statements are made. The potential risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results, performance or achievements to differ from the predicted results, performance or achievements include, among others, difficulties or delays we encounter in identifying a permanent Chief Executive Officer; our ability to execute on, and achieve the expected benefits from, our operational and strategic initiatives; our inability to realize the expected reduction in overhead expenses as a result of our reduction in force; volatility of the global financial markets and uncertain economic conditions, including changes in interest rates, inflationary pressures, recessionary concerns or global supply chain issues; public response to and changes in the local, state and federal regulatory framework affecting renewable energy projects; risks associated with changes in the fair value of our investments and the methods we use to estimate the fair value of our assets; and other risks and uncertainties discussed in our most recent Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K filed with or furnished to the SEC. Although Greenbacker believes the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are based upon reasonable assumptions, it can give no assurance that the expectations will be attained or that any deviation will not be material. Greenbacker undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statement contained herein to conform to actual results or changes in its expectations.

    Non-GAAP Financial Measures
    In addition to evaluating the Company’s performance on a U.S. GAAP basis, the Company utilizes certain non-GAAP financial measures to analyze the operating performance of our segments as well as our consolidated business. Each of these measures should not be considered in isolation from or as superior to or as a substitute for other financial measures determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP, such as net income (loss) or operating income (loss). The Company uses these non-GAAP financial measures to supplement its U.S. GAAP results in order to provide a more complete understanding of the factors and trends affecting its operations.

    Adjusted EBITDA
    Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure that the Company uses as a performance measure, as well as for internal planning purposes. We believe that Adjusted EBITDA is useful to management and investors in providing a measure of core financial performance adjusted to allow for comparisons of results of operations across reporting periods on a consistent basis, as it includes adjustments relating to items that are not indicative on the ongoing operating performance of the business.

    Adjusted EBITDA is a performance measure used by management that is not calculated in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered in isolation from or as superior to or as a substitute for net income (loss), operating income (loss) or any other measure of financial performance calculated in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Additionally, our calculations of Adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies.

    Funds From Operations (FFO)
    FFO is a non-GAAP financial measure that the Company uses as a performance measure to analyze net earnings from operations without the effects of certain non-recurring items that are not indicative of the ongoing operating performance of the business. FFO is calculated using Adjusted EBITDA less the impact of interest expense (excluding the non-cash component) and distributions to tax equity investors under the financing facilities associated with our IPP segment. 

    The Company believes that the analysis and presentation of FFO will enhance our investor’s understanding of the ongoing performance of our operating business. The Company considers FFO, in addition to other GAAP and non-GAAP measures, in assessing operating performance and as a proxy for growth in distribution coverage over the long term.

    FFO should not be considered in isolation from or as a superior to or as a substitute for net income (loss), operating income (loss) or any other measure of financial performance calculated in accordance with U.S. GAAP.

    General Disclosure
    This information has been prepared solely for informational purposes and is not an offer to buy or sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any security, or to participate in any trading or investment strategy. The information presented herein may involve Greenbacker’s views, estimates, assumptions, facts, and information from other sources that are believed to be accurate and reliable and are, as of the date this information is presented, subject to change without notice.

     
    GREENBACKER RENEWABLE ENERGY COMPANY LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
    CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
    (in thousands, except per share data)
        December 31, 2024   December 31, 2023
             
    Assets        
    Current assets:        
    Cash and cash equivalents   $ 120,057     $ 96,872  
    Restricted cash, current     38,403       85,235  
    Accounts receivable, net     27,103       23,310  
    Derivative assets, current     17,632       24,062  
    Other current assets     28,586       62,429  
    Total current assets     231,781       291,908  
    Noncurrent assets:        
    Restricted cash     3,128       5,568  
    Property, plant and equipment, net     2,232,486       2,133,877  
    Intangible assets, net     362,352       453,214  
    Goodwill     —       221,314  
    Investments, at fair value     74,136       94,878  
    Derivative assets     98,495       118,106  
    Other noncurrent assets     242,667       140,740  
    Total noncurrent assets     3,013,264       3,167,697  
    Total assets   $ 3,245,045     $ 3,459,605  
    Liabilities, Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests and Equity        
    Current liabilities:        
    Accounts payable and accrued expenses   $ 69,464     $ 79,288  
    Shareholder distributions payable     —       7,606  
    Contingent consideration, current     15,293       16,546  
    Current portion of long-term debt     88,901       82,855  
    Current portion of failed sale-leaseback financing and deferred ITC gain     45,868       69,436  
    Other current liabilities     8,767       7,997  
    Total current liabilities     228,293       263,728  
    Noncurrent liabilities:        
    Long-term debt, net of current portion     1,001,654       935,397  
    Failed sale-leaseback financing and deferred ITC gain, net of current portion     201,601       169,829  
    Contingent consideration, net of current portion     300       42,307  
    Deferred tax liabilities, net     35,316       58,696  
    Operating lease liabilities     196,911       108,406  
    Out-of-market contracts, net     180,640       194,785  
    Other noncurrent liabilities     59,261       53,492  
    Total noncurrent liabilities     1,675,683       1,562,912  
    Total liabilities   $ 1,903,976     $ 1,826,640  
    Redeemable noncontrolling interests   $ 1,851     $ 2,179  
    Redeemable common shares, par value, $0.001 per share, nil and 873 outstanding as of 2024 and 2023, respectively     —       1  
    Redeemable common shares, additional paid-in capital     —       7,245  
    Equity:        
    Preferred shares, par value, $0.001 per share, 50,000 authorized; none issued and outstanding     —       —  
    Common shares, par value, $0.001 per share, 350,000 authorized, 199,326 and 197,749 outstanding as of 2024 and 2023, respectively     199       198  
    Additional paid-in capital     1,773,758       1,770,060  
    Accumulated deficit     (584,733 )     (306,525 )
    Accumulated other comprehensive income     34,937       45,932  
    Noncontrolling interests     115,057       113,875  
    Total equity     1,339,218       1,623,540  
    Total liabilities, redeemable noncontrolling interests and equity   $ 3,245,045     $ 3,459,605  
             
             
    GREENBACKER RENEWABLE ENERGY COMPANY LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
    (in thousands, except per share data)
        Year ended December 31,
          2024       2023  
    Revenue        
    Energy revenue   $ 185,225     $ 159,301  
    Investment Management revenue     18,757       13,490  
    Other revenue     6,085       8,434  
    Contract amortization, net     (14,301 )     (8,060 )
    Total net revenue   $ 195,766     $ 173,165  
             
    Operating expenses        
    Direct operating costs     124,681       105,586  
    General and administrative     52,552       60,617  
    Change in fair value of contingent consideration     (39,348 )     (603 )
    Depreciation, amortization and accretion     81,953       125,743  
    Gain on deconsolidation, net     (5,622 )     —  
    Impairment of goodwill     221,314       —  
    Impairment of long-lived assets, net and project termination costs     88,410       59,294  
    Total operating expenses     523,940       350,637  
             
    Operating loss     (328,174 )     (177,472 )
             
    Interest expense, net     (7,612 )     (20,328 )
    Change in fair value of investments, net     (14,701 )     932  
    Income from sale-leaseback transfer of tax benefits     22,764       —  
    Other income (expense), net     2,436       (267 )
             
    Loss before income taxes     (325,287 )     (197,135 )
    Benefit (expense) from income taxes     19,378       21,548  
    Net loss   $ (305,909 )   $ (175,587 )
    Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests and redeemable noncontrolling interests     (63,609 )     (96,116 )
    Net loss attributable to Greenbacker Renewable Energy Company LLC   $ (242,300 )   $ (79,471 )
             
    Earnings per share        
    Basic   $ (1.22 )   $ (0.40 )
    Diluted   $ (1.22 )   $ (0.40 )
             
    Weighted average shares outstanding        
    Basic     199,313       199,293  
    Diluted     199,313       199,293  
             
             
    GREENBACKER RENEWABLE ENERGY COMPANY LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
    (in thousands)
        Year ended December 31,
          2024       2023  
    Cash Flows from Operating Activities        
    Net loss   $ (305,909 )   $ (175,587 )
    Adjustments to reconcile Net loss to Net cash provided by operating activities:        
    Depreciation, amortization and accretion     96,254       133,803  
    Gain on deconsolidation, net     (5,622 )     —  
    Impairment of goodwill     221,314       —  
    Impairment of long-lived assets, net     74,782       59,294  
    Loss on sale of Illinois Winds LLC     12,656       —  
    Share-based compensation expense     378       11,248  
    Changes in fair value of contingent consideration     (39,348 )     (603 )
    Amortization of financing costs and debt discounts     6,261       6,711  
    Amortization of interest rate swap contracts     (1,055 )     6,750  
    Change in fair value of interest rate swaps, net     (44,748 )     (17,763 )
    Gain on interest rate swaps, net     (1,356 )     (2,428 )
    Change in fair value of investments     14,701       (932 )
    Deferred income taxes     (19,378 )     (21,548 )
    Interest expense on failed sale-leaseback financing and deferred ITC gain     7,549       —  
    Income from sale-leaseback transfer of tax benefits     (22,764 )     —  
    Other     3,565       5,743  
    Changes in operating assets and liabilities:        
    Accounts receivable     (4,864 )     (2,959 )
    Current and noncurrent derivative assets     52,602       56,696  
    Other current and noncurrent assets     9,416       (10,661 )
    Accounts payable and accrued expenses     14,164       14,891  
    Operating lease liabilities     (1,543 )     (1,290 )
    Other current and noncurrent liabilities     420       1,036  
    Net cash provided by operating activities     67,475       62,401  
             
    Cash Flows from Investing Activities        
    Purchases of property, plant and equipment     (287,822 )     (360,650 )
    Net deposits returned (paid) for property, plant and equipment     8,155       8,138  
    Proceeds from sale of Illinois Winds LLC     36,563       —  
    Purchases of investments     (734 )     (5,298 )
    Return of capital on investments     6,775       3,906  
    Loans made to other parties     (19,742 )     —  
    Receipts from notes receivable     46,204       30,725  
    Net cash used in investing activities     (210,601 )     (323,179 )
             
    Cash Flows from Financing Activities        
    Shareholder distributions     (37,196 )     (87,597 )
    Return of collateral paid for swap contract     —       1,735  
    Repurchases of common shares     (6,428 )     (82,719 )
    Shares withheld related to net share settlement of equity awards     (1,880 )     —  
    Deferred shareholder servicing fees     (3,150 )     (3,486 )
    Contributions from noncontrolling interests     110,216       144,895  
    Distributions to noncontrolling interests     (17,850 )     (17,498 )
    Proceeds from borrowings     404,580       425,532  
    Payments on borrowings     (320,174 )     (351,764 )
    Proceeds from failed sale-leaseback     111,453       240,969  
    Payments on failed sale-leaseback     (87,089 )     —  
    Payments for loan origination costs     (34,698 )     (11,447 )
    Other capital activity     (745 )     (865 )
    Net cash provided by financing activities     117,039       257,755  
    Net decrease in Cash, cash equivalents and Restricted cash     (26,087 )     (3,023 )
    Cash, cash equivalents and Restricted cash at beginning of period*     187,675       190,698  
    Cash, cash equivalents and Restricted cash at end of period   $ 161,588     $ 187,675  
             
    *Cash, cash equivalents and Restricted cash as of May 18, 2022 includes all consolidated subsidiaries of the Company upon the change in status.


    Non-GAAP Reconciliations

    Adjusted EBITDA

    Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure that the Company uses as a performance measure as well as for internal planning purposes. We believe that Adjusted EBITDA is useful to management and investors in providing a measure of core financial performance adjusted to allow for comparisons of results of operations across reporting periods on a consistent basis as it includes adjustments relating to items that are not indicative of the ongoing operating performance of the business.

    The Company defines Adjusted EBITDA as net income (loss) before: (i) interest expense; (ii) income taxes; (iii) depreciation expense; (iv) amortization expense (including contract amortization); (v) accretion; (vi) impairment of long-lived assets; (vii) amounts attributable to our redeemable and non-redeemable noncontrolling interests; (viii) unrealized gains and losses on financial instruments; (ix) gains and losses for asset dispositions; (x) other income (loss); and (xi) foreign currency gain (loss). Additionally, the Company further adjusts for the following items described below:

    • Share-based compensation is excluded from Adjusted EBITDA as it is different from other forms of compensation as it is a non-cash expense and is highly variable. For example, a cash salary generally has a fixed and unvarying cash cost. In contrast, the expense associated with an equity-based award is generally unrelated to the amount of cash ultimately received by the employee, and the cost to the Company is based on a share-based compensation valuation methodology and underlying assumptions that may vary over time;
    • The change in fair value of contingent consideration, which is related to the Acquisition, is excluded from Adjusted EBITDA, if any such change occurs during the period. The non-cash, mark-to-market adjustments are based on the expected achievement of revenue targets that are difficult to forecast and can be variable, making comparisons across historical and future quarters difficult to evaluate;
    • Beginning 2024, start-up costs associated with new investment strategies is excluded from Adjusted EBITDA. The Company evaluates new investment strategies on a regular basis and excludes start-up cost from Adjusted EBITDA until such time as a new strategy is determined to form part of the Company’s core investment management business.
    • Beginning 2024, placement fees, including internal sales commissions, related to fundraising efforts based on the capital raised, are excluded from Adjusted EBITDA. By excluding these fundraising-related fees from Adjusted EBITDA, we focus on core operational performance, separate from capital raising efforts, which might vary significantly from period to period.
    • Other costs that are not consistently occurring, not reflective of expected future operating expense and provide no insight into the fundamentals of current or past operations of our business are excluded from Adjusted EBITDA. This includes costs such as professional services and legal fees, and other non-recurring costs unrelated to the ongoing operations of the Company.

    Adjusted EBITDA is a performance measure used by management that is not calculated in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered in isolation from or as superior to or as a substitute for net income (loss), operating income (loss) or any other measure of financial performance calculated in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Additionally, our calculations of Adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies.

    FFO

    FFO is a non-GAAP financial measure that the Company uses as a performance measure to analyze net earnings from operations without the effects of certain non-recurring items that are not indicative of the ongoing operating performance of the business.

    FFO is calculated using Adjusted EBITDA less the impact of interest expense (excluding the non-cash component) and distributions to Tax Equity Investors under the financing facilities associated with our IPP segment. The Company excludes these distributions as these are not recorded within Adjusted EBITDA and is therefore not a component of our earnings from operations.

    The Company believes that the analysis and presentation of FFO will enhance our investors’ understanding of the ongoing performance of our operating business. The Company considers FFO, in addition to other GAAP and non-GAAP measures, in assessing operating performance and as a proxy for growth in distribution coverage over the long-term.

    Adjusted EBITDA and FFO should not be considered in isolation from or as a superior to or as a substitute for net income (loss), operating income (loss) or any other measure of financial performance calculated in accordance with U.S. GAAP.

    The following table reconciles Net loss attributable to Greenbacker Renewable Energy Company LLC to Adjusted EBITDA and FFO:

        Three months ended December 31,   Year ended December 31,
    (in thousands)     2024       2023       2024       2023  
    Net loss attributable to Greenbacker Renewable Energy Company LLC   $ (176,623 )   $ (15,822 )   $ (242,300 )   $ (79,471 )
    Add back or deduct the following:                
    Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests and redeemable noncontrolling interests     (14,635 )     (30,307 )     (63,609 )     (96,116 )
    Benefit (expense) from income taxes     (16,799 )     (7,393 )     (19,378 )     (21,548 )
    Interest expense, net     (27,546 )     28,240       7,612       20,328  
    Depreciation, amortization and accretion(1)     25,310       15,589       97,056       134,647  
    EBITDA   $ (210,293 )   $ (9,693 )   $ (220,619 )   $ (42,160 )
    Share-based compensation expense     (12,602 )     1,255       378       11,248  
    Change in fair value of contingent consideration     (35,584 )     3,500       (39,348 )     (603 )
    Change in fair value of investments, net     15,357       (2,200 )     14,701       (932 )
    Income from sale-leaseback transfer of tax benefits     (22,764 )     —       (22,764 )     —  
    Other income (expense), net     (1,808 )     512       (2,436 )     267  
    Gain on deconsolidation, net     100       —       (5,622 )     —  
    Loss on asset disposition     12,932       —       12,932       —  
    Impairment of goodwill     221,314       —       221,314       —  
    Impairment of long-lived assets, net and project termination costs     55,700       8,632       88,410       59,294  
    Non-recurring professional services and legal fees     1,560       468       8,654       3,388  
    Non-recurring salaries and personnel related expenses(2)     2,491       —       4,150       1,250  
    Adjusted EBITDA   $ 26,403     $ 2,474     $ 59,750     $ 31,752  
    Cash portion of interest expense     (7,828 )     (7,869 )     (30,217 )     (27,473 )
    Distributions to tax equity investors     (4,327 )     (2,449 )     (18,848 )     (15,748 )
    FFO   $ 14,248     $ (7,844 )   $ 10,685     $ (11,469 )
                     
    (1) Includes contract amortization, net in the amount of $4.9 million, $5.8 million, $14.3 million, and $8.1 million for the three months ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 and the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively, which are included in Contract amortization, net on the Consolidated Statements of Operations; also includes certain other amortization costs included in Direct operating costs and General and administrative on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
                     
    (2) Non-recurring salaries and personnel related expenses for 2024 include start-up costs which primarily include salaries and personnel related expenses of incremental employees hired in advance to launch new investment strategy initiatives. Given the nature and scale of the related costs and activities, management does not view these as normal, recurring operating expenses, but rather as non-recurring investments to initially develop our new funds. Therefore, we believe it is useful and necessary for investors to understand our core operating performance in current and future periods by excluding the impact of these start-up costs as incurred. Non-recurring salaries and personnel related expenses for 2024 also include placement fees, including internal sales commission.

    Adjusted EBITDA for the year ended December 31, 2024 has not been adjusted for the charges of $16.6 million incurred as part of a settlement agreement with a third-party vendor due to the termination of the existing purchase contract in order to acquire the solar panels needed for our development and construction pipeline from a different vendor with significantly better economic proposition due to reduced expected cash outlays.

    The following table reconciles total Segment Adjusted EBITDA to Net loss attributable to Greenbacker Renewable Energy Company LLC: 

        Three months ended December 31,   Year ended December 31,
    (in thousands)     2024       2023       2024       2023  
    Segment Adjusted EBITDA:                
    IPP Adjusted EBITDA   $ 26,532     $ 6,721     $ 81,197     $ 62,180  
    IM Adjusted EBITDA     3,033       1,601       2,051       (2,674 )
    Total Segment Adjusted EBITDA   $ 29,565     $ 8,322     $ 83,248     $ 59,506  
                     
    Reconciliation:                
    Total Segment Adjusted EBITDA   $ 29,565     $ 8,322     $ 83,248     $ 59,506  
    Unallocated corporate expenses     (3,162 )     (5,848 )     (23,498 )     (27,754 )
    Total Adjusted EBITDA     26,403       2,474       59,750       31,752  
                     
    Less:                
    Share-based compensation expense     (12,602 )     1,255       378       11,248  
    Change in fair value of contingent consideration     (35,584 )     3,500       (39,348 )     (603 )
    Gain on deconsolidation, net     100       —       (5,622 )     —  
    Loss on asset disposition     12,932       —       12,932       —  
    Impairment of goodwill     221,314       —       221,314       —  
    Impairment of long-lived assets, net and project termination costs     55,700       8,632       88,410       59,294  
    Depreciation, amortization and accretion(1)     25,310       15,589       97,056       134,647  
    Non-recurring professional services and legal fees     1,560       468       8,654       3,388  
    Non-recurring salaries and personnel related expenses(2)     2,491       —       4,150       1,250  
    Operating loss   $ (244,818 )   $ (26,970 )   $ (328,174 )   $ (177,472 )
                     
    Interest expense, net     27,546       (28,240 )     (7,612 )     (20,328 )
    Change in fair value of investments, net     (15,357 )     2,200       (14,701 )     932  
    Income from sale-leaseback transfer of tax benefits     22,764       —       22,764       —  
    Other income (expense), net     1,808       (512 )     2,436       (267 )
    Loss before income taxes   $ (208,057 )   $ (53,522 )   $ (325,287 )   $ (197,135 )
                     
    Benefit from income taxes     16,799       7,393       19,378       21,548  
    Net loss   $ (191,258 )   $ (46,129 )   $ (305,909 )   $ (175,587 )
                     
    Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests and redeemable noncontrolling interests     (14,635 )     (30,307 )     (63,609 )     (96,116 )
    Net loss attributable to Greenbacker Renewable Energy Company LLC   $ (176,623 )   $ (15,822 )   $ (242,300 )   $ (79,471 )
                     
    (1) Includes contract amortization, net in the amount of $4.9 million, $5.8 million, $14.3 million, and $8.1 million for the three months ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 and the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively, which are included in Contract amortization, net on the Consolidated Statements of Operations; also includes certain other amortization costs included in Direct operating costs and General and administrative on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
                     
    (2) Non-recurring salaries and personnel related expenses for 2024 include start-up costs which primarily include salaries and personnel related expenses of incremental employees hired in advance to launch new investment strategy initiatives. Given the nature and scale of the related costs and activities, management does not view these as normal, recurring operating expenses, but rather as non-recurring investments to initially develop our new funds. Therefore, we believe it is useful and necessary for investors to understand our core operating performance in current and future periods by excluding the impact of these start-up costs as incurred. Non-recurring salaries and personnel related expenses for 2024 also include placement fees, including internal sales commission.


    About Greenbacker Renewable Energy Company

    Greenbacker Renewable Energy Company LLC is a publicly reporting, non-traded limited liability sustainable infrastructure company that both acquires and manages income-producing renewable energy and other energy-related businesses, including solar and wind farms, and provides investment management services to other renewable energy investment vehicles. We seek to acquire and operate high-quality projects that sell clean power under long-term contracts to high-creditworthy counterparties such as utilities, municipalities, and corporations. We are long-term owner-operators, who strive to be good stewards of the land and responsible members of the communities in which we operate. Greenbacker conducts its investment management business through its wholly owned subsidiary, Greenbacker Capital Management, LLC, an SEC-registered investment adviser. We believe our focus on power production and asset management creates value that we can then pass on to our shareholders—while facilitating the transition toward a clean energy future. For more information, please visit https://greenbackercapital.com.

    About Greenbacker Capital Management
    Greenbacker Capital Management LLC is an SEC registered investment adviser that provides advisory and oversight services related to project development, acquisition, and operations in the renewable energy, energy efficiency, and sustainability industries. For more information, please visit www.greenbackercapital.com.

    Greenbacker media contact
    Chris Larson
    Media Communications
    646.569.9532
    c.larson@greenbackercapital.com

    ____________________________________________
    ¹ The financial and portfolio metrics set forth herein are unaudited and subject to change. Data as of December 31, 2024. Total assets and megawatts statistics include those projects where we have contracted for the acquisition of the project pursuant to a Membership Interest Purchase Agreement (“MIPA”).
    ² Includes pre-operating and operating assets across combined GREC and GREC II portfolios. Data as of December 31, 2024.
    ³ Total operating revenue excludes non-cash contract amortization, net.
    ⁴ Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure that the Company uses as a performance measure, as well as for internal planning purposes. We believe that Adjusted EBITDA is useful to management and investors in providing a measure of core financial performance adjusted to allow for comparisons of results of operations across reporting periods on a consistent basis, as it includes adjustments relating to items that are not indicative on the ongoing operating performance of the business. See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” for additional discussion. Adjusted EBITDA is unaudited. See the Company’s 10-K filed with the SEC for additional financial information and important related disclosures.
    ⁵ Data as of December 31, 2024. Total assets and megawatts statistics include those projects where we have contracted for the acquisition of the project pursuant to a Membership Interest Purchase Agreement (“MIPA”). The financial and portfolio metrics set forth herein are unaudited and subject to change
    ⁶ Does not include power generated from biomass facility during 2023 and a portion of 2024, and also does not include assets in which the Company holds a preferred equity position
    ⁷ Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) – U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)
    ⁸ Data is as of December 31, 2024. When compared with a similar amount of power generation from fossil fuels. Carbon abatement is calculated using the EPA Greenhouse Gas Equivalencies Calculator which uses the Avoided Emissions and generation Tool (AVERT) US national weighted average CO2 marginal emission rate to convert reductions of kilowatt-hours into avoided units of carbon dioxide emissions.

    ⁹ Data is as of December 31, 2024. Water saved by Greenbacker’s clean energy projects is compared to the amount of water needed to produce the same amount of power by burning coal. Gallons of water saved are calculated based on Operational water consumption and withdrawal factors for electricity generating technologies: a review of existing literature – IOPscience, J Macknick et al 2012 Environ. Res. Lett. 7 045802.
    ¹⁰ Data is as of December 31, 2024. Green jobs calculated using The National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) State Clean Energy Employment Projection Support, nrel.gov.

    The MIL Network –

    April 2, 2025
←Previous Page
1 … 823 824 825 826 827 … 1,471
Next Page→
NewzIntel.com

NewzIntel.com

MIL Open Source Intelligence

  • Blog
  • About
  • FAQs
  • Authors
  • Events
  • Shop
  • Patterns
  • Themes

Twenty Twenty-Five

Designed with WordPress