Category: housing

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Interview with Stephen Cenatiempo, 2CC

    Source: Australian Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister for Industry

    Cenatiempo:

    Let’s talk federal politics with the Assistant Minister for Competition, Charities and Treasury, and the Member for Fenner, Andrew Leigh. Good morning.

    Leigh:

    Good morning Stephen. Happy Budget day!

    Cenatiempo:

    Well look, I’ve got to say I hate Budget week Andrew, but I thank you anyway, I want to ask you something – your role as Assistant Minister for Treasury. What does that mean? How does that tie into the overall Treasury, Treasurer, finance portfolio, et cetera.

    Leigh:

    I’m part of the Treasury economics team, and I have particular responsibility for the issues of competition, multinational tax, for the Mint and for the Australian Bureau of Statistics.

    Cenatiempo:

    Okay. Now the Budget will be handed down tonight. Now pox on both your houses. I mean, this is going to be a cash splash which all budgets leading into elections are, and the Opposition has basically said they will match every dollar. Isn’t it time for some responsible economic management rather than just throwing cash around that we don’t have?

    Leigh:

    Well Stephen, in less than 3 years we’ve reduced Liberal Party debt by $177 billion.

    Cenatiempo:

    Well, it’s not Liberal Party debt. Stop saying that. But okay, you say you’ve reduced debt. Okay.

    Leigh:

    This is compared to what they were forecasting in their last budget and what we’ve achieved. We turned 2 big Liberal deficits into 2 Labor surpluses. We shrunk this year’s deficit. We have made huge reprioritisations and savings. Some $95 billion of reprioritisation savings over the last term.

    Cenatiempo:

    The vast majority of that turnaround has been receipts that the government wasn’t anticipating, so you can’t take credit for that?

    Leigh:

    Well, the reprioritisations and savings are government decisions, and that $95 billion compares to zero in the Liberals’ last budget. So we’ve made tough decisions, and some of that has involved curtailing the use of consultants and contractors, which Canberrans will know is a much more expensive way of doing things. We had that shadow public service workforce of 50,000, rather than having properly trained public servants doing their jobs. We’ve managed to get down the wait times for Veterans Affairs, and we’ve managed to ensure that we have the public service as a steward of the nation’s finances.

    Cenatiempo:

    Yeah, I’m sure that resonates here in Canberra, but I don’t know that it resonates in the rest of the country Andrew. But I want to talk about this latest cash splash, an extension of $150 of this energy rebate. There has been no attempt from the government to actually fix the underlying problem, and that is the cost of electricity. All you’re doing is giving us our own money back to pay electricity bills that you’ve made higher.

    Leigh:

    Well, I think Canberrans know the benefits of having renewable energy, given that we’re 100 per cent renewable energy.

    Cenatiempo:

    Well, we’re not. That’s again, again that’s another lie but anyway. I’m not saying you’re perpetrating that lie, because it’s something that we just tend to throw around when we know it’s not true.

    Leigh:

    Stephen, it is a fact that the ACT is 100 per cent renewable energy.

    Cenatiempo:

    Well hang on, hang on Andrew. Andrew, no, no, I’m going to stop you there because I hate it when people say this. We produce 5 per cent of our own electricity. Ninety-five per cent comes from across the border, and of that 95 per cent somewhere between 70 per cent and 80 per cent is made from fossil fuels. We do not have 100 per cent renewable electricity in Canberra, full stop.

    Leigh:

    We have always relied on electricity from New South Wales. We choose now to draw it from renewable sources in New South Wales and the ACT.

    Cenatiempo:

    You can’t make that determination. You just, that’s just something you say.

    Leigh:

    No, this a fact. And what that meant was when you had the overseas crisis which drove up gas prices, the ACT wasn’t affected by that in the way that other jurisdictions were.

    Cenatiempo:

    Well, my electricity bills going up.

    Leigh:

    By moving to renewable energy, we’re able to make ourselves less dependent on global crises. Alongside the renewable energy rollout, we’re delivering energy bill relief. This energy bill relief will continue for another half a year, and Canberrans will see it taken directly off their bill.

    Cenatiempo:

    But Andrew, this is the point. It’s not energy bill relief. The energy bills are still what they are, and they’re still rising. You’re just giving us back our own money to cut a little bit off the top.

    Leigh:

    Well, what people are going to see very clearly Stephen, is that $150 in rebates automatically applied to their energy bills in quarterly instalments. I think that’s going to be pretty important for many Australians.

    Cenatiempo:

    Why should I subsidise your electricity bill by $150 Andrew?

    Leigh:

    Well, we’re not the only sources of revenue Stephen. One of the things the Albanese government has done is focused on multinational taxation, making sure multinationals pay their fair share. That is one of the sources of government revenue which goes into paying these energy bills.

    Cenatiempo:

    But my point is, you as a well‑paid public servant, don’t need the $150 – yet those Canberrans that desperately do need it are subsidising, to an extent, your $150.

    Leigh:

    Yeah, I mean we certainly looked at targeted ways of doing this. It turns out that the cost of targeting can be bigger than the benefits. In this case, flat energy bill relief provides a straightforward, simple way of doing things and ensures that every Australian is getting energy bill relief, just as every Australian income taxpayer got a tax cut last year.

    Cenatiempo:

    I just, you know it seems to me that you know when fiscal, economic management is the order of the day, all we’ve seen is the Prime Minister stand up for the last 2 weeks and promised to throw a billion dollars of this, billions of these, billions of that, billions of that. It’s like an Oprah Winfrey Show.

    Leigh:

    I guess what people aren’t seeing are those savings and reprioritisation that we talked about before. Those are demonstrated in our first 2 surpluses and in a much smaller deficit this year than the one we inherited. Those are the quiet decisions that have been made that underpin this Budget. The responsible economic management that we’ve put in place very careful reprioritisations and savings, infrastructure portfolio and public service and a whole range of other areas. Now we came into office after sports rorts, the car park rorts, with so much wasted. Waste and mismanagement under JobKeeper – $20 billion going to firms with rising revenue.

    Cenatiempo:

    And at the time, you supported all that but yeah.

    Leigh:

    I was a vociferous critic of the JobKeeper rorts and waste, saying very clearly that we shouldn’t have been giving JobKeeper to firms with rising revenue. $20 billion out the door through that one decision alone, I was very critical of the sports rorts, very critical the car park rorts. I’m on the record on most of those things while the former Morrison government was in office, and that’s what’s changed.

    Cenatiempo:

    But hang on. When you say rorts – you use the term rorts and I’m going to pull you up on this, because rorts means anything the other side does if we do it, it’s responsible. That’s the reality of it. So you know, you use these terms, and it’s just pure politicking Andrew. We’re not talking about reality.

    Leigh:

    We had an Auditor‑General report very clearly casting at the former government over sports rorts. A Minister resigned over that Stephen. This was a very clear rort. I don’t think rorts come much clearer than when a Minister says I’m stepping down because I’ve done the wrong thing. And the Auditor‑General says this is outrageous.

    Cenatiempo:

    Well, yeah. Okay, alright. I want to read something to you for a moment. This is from a report that’s been done by the Vice President of Crestview Strategy here in Australia in a pre‑budget reflection. She says ‘Framed as responsible relief, the package continues Labor’s patent of targeted subsidies and short‑term support. But there’s growing criticism that these handouts while politically popular, do little to address structural issues and may in fact worsen them. As AFR Editor‑at‑large, Michael Stutchbury put it – ‘This is a government that treats voters like mugs with short‑term cash splashes while ignoring long‑term fiscal consequences the promised $275 cut to household power bills from 2022 remains unmet, and this rebate looks more like a political band aid than an economic fix’. You can’t argue with any of that?

    Leigh:

    We certainly need to be doing both things Stephen. You need to be dealing with those immediate cost‑of‑living pressures and making investments in productivity in the future. The energy investments we talked about are a part of that, but also the investments in better infrastructure around competition. So, the supermarket report that came out last week…

    Cenatiempo:

    Yeah, which said there was no evidence of price gouging by the way.

    Leigh:

    …which said very clearly that there were patterns such as high‑low pricing, that margins had increased and that our supermarkets are among the most profitable in the world. It then made a series of recommendations…

    Cenatiempo:

    Do we want our supermarkets to not be profitable?

    Leigh:

    We do not need the most profitable supermarkets in the world. I don’t think we need those margins to be rising. They were some of the salient points that the ACCC was making, that the squeeze at the checkout was being matched by an increase in profit margins. And you talk about structural reform Stephen, some of the work we’ve done in competition really is about structural reform because competition is so fundamental to productivity growth which ultimately drives living standards growth. So we’ve had the biggest merger shake up in half a century. We’ve had a whole lot of careful work being done by the Competition Taskforce in order to produce a more dynamic and competitive economy.

    Cenatiempo:

    Well, some economists would disagree with you there Andrew, but is there anything in the Budget that’s going to come out tonight that we don’t already know about?

    Leigh:

    Absolutely, there’s always some exciting bits coming out in the Treasurer’s speech. So, everyone should be tuning in at 7.30 to hear Jim stand up and deliver his fourth Budget.

    Cenatiempo:

    Alright, we’ll be broadcasting that live here on 2CC. Andrew, next time we catch up I think we’ll officially be in an election campaign won’t we?

    Leigh:

    I think that’s likely, but the Prime Minister will make the decision.

    Cenatiempo:

    But I mean, he doesn’t have a choice anymore, does he? I mean he’s got to go. Well, I mean the 17th of May is the absolute latest he can go?

    Leigh:

    We’ll have a May election. The only question there is which Saturday in May it will be.

    Cenatiempo:

    Righto. Alright, well he’s got to call it sooner rather than later. Andrew, good to talk to you. We’ll catch up in a couple weeks.

    Leigh:

    Likewise, thanks Stephen.

    Cenatiempo:

    Andrew Leigh, Assistant Minister for Competition, Charities, Treasury, and the Member for Fenner.

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI China: China to improve quality of ‘silver economy’

    Source: China State Council Information Office 3

    An elderly couple watch wedding dress photos shot by their nursing home in Changzhou, east China’s Jiangsu province, Jan. 9, 2024. [Photo/Xinhua]

    China will redouble its efforts to improve the quality and expand the capacity of its “silver economy,” namely economic activities related to the country’s large elderly population, Vice Minister of Civil Affairs Tang Chengpei said on Monday.

    These efforts aim to create a positive cycle combining economic development and the improvement of people’s livelihoods, Tang said in his remarks at the China Development Forum 2025, which was held from Sunday to Monday.

    The 10-year period from 2025 to 2035 is an important time window for China to respond proactively to the challenge of population aging, Tang said.

    He outlined efforts to promote the integrated development of the elderly care industry and industries such as culture, tourism, health, sports and domestic services, to expand the scope and scenarios of elderly care services, and to advance home renovation projects offering more elderly-friendly facilities, among other efforts.

    Efforts will also go into making public spaces and e-commerce platforms more senior-friendly, boosting the standardization and supervision of relevant products and services for the elderly, and advancing research and policy support for the development of the “silver economy,” he said.

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI Banking: Khada Valley Livelihood Restoration Program

    Source: Asia Development Bank

    Transcript

    New 23km Kvesheti-Kobi road in Georgia has been constructed to enhance trade flow, road safety, and provide economic opportunities for the Khada Valley population.

    Alongside the road construction that will provide a year-round access to the valley, the Asian Development Bank (ADB) initiated the Khada Valley Livelihood Restoration and Improvement Program.

    Kamel Bouhmad
    Former Deputy Country Director (2021-2024)
    ADB Georgia Resident Mission

    The purpose was really not to wait until the road is fully built, but to put together an assistance package for the local population so they can start developing skills and getting ready for a new reality when the infrastructure will be there.

    Salome Tsurtsumia
    Deputy Chairman
    Roads Department of Georgia

    The future perspective of the valley’s development is tourism and to attract more tourists, it’s important to have the relevant knowledge and experience in producing organic products.

    ADB engaged the UN Food and Agriculture Organization to help local farmers improve agricultural production.

    Anuki Natsvlishvili
    Veterinary and Food Safety Specialist
    UN Food and Agriculture Organization

    The needs assessment showed us that most farmers have one or two cows, and the milk quality is extremely low. The cheeses were made from unpasteurized milk. For vegetable producers, 02:14 they were not using irrigation systems, or doing manual composting. And for honey producers, farmers wanted to receive information about food safety and legislation. In the beginning, we only started working with a few farmers from Kvesheti and Arakhveti communities. But new farmers started to show up and we started working in several new communities.

    Tariel Karelidze
    Community Liaison Officer
    ADB Consultant

    Our farmer beneficiaries, in addition to theoretical and practical knowledge, received animal food supplements, selected agricultural equipment based on their activities, and established demonstration plots. There are huge expectations for the Kvesheti-Kobi road in the community. They anticipate more tourists and better market access.

    Ketevan Zakaidze
    Farmer from Arakhveti Village

    I have three cows and I make cheese and Matsoni. I learned a lot of new things, like how to get more cheese from milk, how to take care for cows to avoid Mastitis, how to produce safe products to keep ourselves healthy.

    Zurab Beniaidze
    Beekeper from Benian-Begoni Village

    We learned many new things. For example, it was very interesting to learn about acid-based pesticides for bee ticks. We also received uniforms which are essential for beekeeping. I have already started using them.

    The one-year program trained 72 farmers from the Khada Valley and nearby villages.

    Tea Papuashvili
    Project Officer (Infrastructure)
    ADB Georgia Resident Mission

    We have observed that from one training session to another, the number of people kept increasing. This was really a sign of success, a sign that people’s trust and interest were there to learn more and to develop their skills and improve their living conditions.

    Lesley Bearman Lahm
    Country Director
    ADB Georgia Resident Mission

    With this road built, the local population will be provided with unlimited year-round access to their homes and lands, enabling them to expand agriculture production and reap financial gains from increased tourism in the valley.

    MIL OSI Global Banks

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Miramar unexplained death now a homicide investigation

    Source: New Zealand Police (National News)

    Attribute to Detective Inspector Nick Pritchard:

    The death of a man found critically injured in Miramar last week is now being treated as a homicide, as Police urgently seek two pedestrians, and motorists with dashcam footage.

    Abdul Nabizadah, 63, was located with serious head injuries at the intersection of Camperdown Road and Totara Road, about 2.20am on 17 March. Mr Nabizadah was found by Police carrying out area enquiries following a serious burglary that happened a short distance away about 20 minutes earlier.

    Sadly, he died in hospital the following day.

    A post-mortem determined Mr Nabizadah died as a result of blunt force injury after being assaulted, and further enquiries have led to the investigation being upgraded to a homicide this morning.

    Dashcam footage, passersby may be critical to investigation

    As part of our investigation, we urgently need to hear from two people who had earlier passed by the area where Mr Nabizadah was found.

    At 12.28am, a man was seen walking down Camperdown Road from Totara Street and turned right in to Darlington Road from Totara Street. The man was wearing a light-coloured top and dark pants.

    We know Mr Nabizadah arrived in Totara Street in his silver-coloured Toyota Aqua, registration NQE681, at 12.25am, so this man may well have seen Mr Nabizadah and or his vehicle. We urge this person, or anyone who may know them, to come forward as soon as possible.

    At 1.30am, a man in fitness clothing or activewear was seen running south on Darlington Road, before crossing the Camperdown Road intersection. He was wearing a blue shirt, and we also need to hear from him.

    Just as crucially, the investigators need to hear from any motorist who has dashcam footage and was in the Miramar area between midnight and 3am on 17 March, in particular anyone who travelled through the intersection of Totara Street and Camperdown Road. Even if your footage shows no cars or people on the street, it’s important that we see it.

    Parallel investigation into intruder burglary

    Police are progressing a second investigation into a disturbing burglary, where two people found an intruder rummaging through their Darlington Road house about 2am on 17 March.  During the burglary there was a physical altercation which caused an injury to the homeowner.

    We have yet to locate this offender, who had been wearing gumboots and a white cap, and is described by witnesses as possibly being of Māori descent, between 177-180cm tall (5’10” to 5’11”) and of and athletic build.

    Investigators have been speaking with neighbours and reviewing evidence gathered at the scene, but we have yet to establish a link between the burglary and the death of Mr Nabizadah.

    Meanwhile, Police are continuing to carry out reassurance patrols in the Miramar area. We know these events are upsetting and concerning for the community, but the investigation teams are working doggedly to get justice for the victims of the homicide and burglary, and their families.  Police are providing ongoing support to both families.

    If you have any information that could help the investigation teams, please update us online now or call 105.

    Please use the reference number 250317/6324, or reference Operation Celtic.

    Information can also be provided anonymously via Crime Stoppers on 0800 555 111.

    ENDS

    Issued by the Police Media Centre

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Cortez Masto, Wyden, Padilla Statement on Reports the IRS Plans to Share Sensitive Taxpayer Data to DHS

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Nevada Cortez Masto

    Washington, D.C. – Today, U.S. Senators Catherine Cortez Masto (D-Nev.), Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), and Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) released the following statement in response to reports the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is planning to provide sensitive taxpayer information to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to locate suspected undocumented immigrants.

    This statement comes after their letter to IRS Acting Commissioner Melanie Krause, IRS Acting Chief Counsel Andrew De Mello, and DHS Secretary Kristi Noem demanding answers on reports that DHS and the “Department of Government Efficiency” have illegally requested sensitive taxpayer information from the IRS. So far, the Trump Administration has not responded to their demand for answers about their plans to require the IRS to turn over home addresses, phone numbers, and email addresses of over 700,000 people.

     “This weekend, it became clear that the Trump Administration is finalizing plans totarget and penalize people who are following federal law and contributing to our economy. This agreement between the IRS and DHS – if finalized – will have long-lasting and devastating implications on our economy, taxpayer privacy, immigrant communities, and the rule of law.

    “It’s past time for the Trump Administration to make their plans public. The IRS and DHS must disclose the extent of this agreement and brief Congress immediately.”

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Markey Joins Peters, Senate Committee Ranking Members in Demanding Immediate Review by Agency Inspectors General of Trump Administration’s Mass Dismissals of Federal Employees

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Massachusetts Ed Markey

    Senators Question Trump Administration Claims and Whether Actions Will Increase Waste and Abuse

    Washington (March 21, 2025) – Senator Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.), Ranking Member of the Small Business and Entrepreneurship Committee joined Senator Gary Peters (D-MI), Ranking Member of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, and 15 Senate Committee Ranking Members in sending a letter to the Inspectors General of 23 federal agencies, pressing for details on the impact of President Trump’s sweeping and unprecedented dismissal of tens of thousands of federal employees. The senators asked the Inspectors General to review the Trump Administration’s actions, citing potential violations of federal laws and procedures, which the senators warn could harm Americans’ access to vital government services and increase waste and abuse of taxpayer dollars.
    “The decision to terminate thousands of employees across multiple federal agencies will impose undue hardship on millions of Americans who rely on their services,” wrote the Senators. “The loss of experienced agency staff may risk causing serious disruptions to nearly 73 million Americans who rely on the Social Security Administration (SSA) to administer retiree and disability benefits and 9.1 million veterans who depend on the Department of Veteran Affairs (V.A.), many of which rely on the V.A. for life saving medical treatments and care.”  
    Highlighting the devastating consequences of these mass firings, the senators underscored the Trump Administration’s layoffs have already disrupted critical operations at agencies that millions of Americans depend on for survival. 
    “Among the 2,400 employees fired from the V.A. since Mr. Trump’s inauguration are workers who purchase medical supplies, schedule appointments and arrange rides for patients to see their doctors,” wrote the Senators, citing a NY Times report. “Additionally, taxpayers seeking in-person assistance as they navigate the 2025 filing season may find the support centers they previously relied on completely relocated or shuttered. That risk is a direct consequence of the Administration’s mass dismissals and decision to terminate over 100 IRS offices with Tax Assistance Centers (TAC) – which provide free, in-person assistance for those seeking it.”
    The senators are requesting that IGs examine whether these dismissals violated agency policies and assess the damage to agency missions, public safety, and national security, calling for an initial review to be completed within 60 days, with findings made available to the public to ensure transparency and accountability.  
    The letter was signed by U.S. Senators and Ranking Members Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry, Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY), Special Committee on Aging, Patty Murray (D-WA), Committee on Appropriations, Jack Reed (D-RI), Committee on Armed Services, Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, Maria Cantwell (D-WA), Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), Committee on Environment and Public Works, Ron Wyden (D-OR), Committee on Finance, Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH), Committee on Foreign Relations, Bernie Sanders (I-VT), Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions, Dick Durbin (D-IL), Committee on the Judiciary, Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, Martin Heinrich (D-NM), Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, and Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Committee on the Budget.
    The full text of the letter can be found here. 

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Medicaid Cuts Would Cost Money and Endanger Lives, Say Central WA Health Care Providers

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Washington Maria Cantwell
    03.21.25
    Medicaid Cuts Would Cost Money and Endanger Lives, Say Central WA Health Care Providers
    Medicaid, known in WA as Apple Health, would face significant cuts from GOP budget proposal to slash up to $880 billion from essential health care program
    RICHLAND, WA – Today, U.S. Senator Maria Cantwell (D-WA), senior member of the Senate Finance Committee and ranking member of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, held a press conference with Central Washington health care professionals and providers to discuss the harms that would result from proposed cuts to Medicaid.
    “Our health care system today does save money when we give people the freedom to see a doctor when they need to, instead of forcing them to wait until they absolutely have to,” said Sen. Cantwell. ”These attempts aren’t about reducing costs, they are literally about destroying our health care system.”
    “It is a tsunami. And trust me, this is not a drill,” she continued. “This is a real proposal, and we have to wake up the American people, and certainly here in Central Washington, to the devastating impacts they could see if Medicaid was cut.”
    “There’s very good evidence from multiple studies that preventive care delivers better quality of life, better health outcomes, at a lower overall cost,” said Dr. Richard Meadows, Chief Medical Officer, Providence Clinical Network. “The thought that somehow saving money by not funding Medicaid would be better for our country, it just does not make any financial sense, because we know from studies that if you wait and treat things later on it is far more expensive. People miss more time from work, they’re not able to be there for their families, and ultimately it costs all of us as taxpayers more money.”
    Brenda Morgan, a Tri-Cities area home care provider, shared the story of her client, Samantha, an autistic young adult with a heart condition, who needs a feeding tube for meals and medications. “She wants me to ask you,” Morgan said, “’Why aren’t people thinking about us? Do they not know that I can’t survive without Medicaid?’”
    Medicaid is the federal program that insures many low-income adults and children, pregnant people, seniors, and people with disabilities. Washington state’s Medicaid program, Apple Health, ensures that eligible Washingtonians can afford to seek health care and see providers when they need to.  The program also ensures that hospitals receive reimbursements for the significant number of low-income people they serve. Medicaid paid for $3.36 billion in hospital care in Washington state in state fiscal year 2024. More than 1.9 million Washingtonians are enrolled in Medicaid.
    In the 4th U.S. Congressional District, 70% of children and 24% of adults are covered by Medicaid / Apple Health.
    In Washington state legislative district 16, which includes Richland, 60% of kids and 32% of the total population are covered by Medicaid / Apple Health.
    In legislative district 8, which includes Kennewick and most of Benton County, 49% of kids and 26% of the total population are covered by Medicaid / Apple Health.
    In Yakima County’s legislative district 15, 87% of kids and 51% of the population are covered by Medicaid / Apple Health. These are the highest numbers for any legislative district in the state.
    On February 25, House Republicans voted to advance President Trump’s budget resolution, which proposes up to an $880 billion cut from Medicaid.
    Last month, Sen. Cantwell released a snapshot report highlighting the impact that slashing Medicaid to fund tax cuts for corporations and the ultra-wealthy would have on Washington state’s health care system — especially in Central and Eastern Washington.
    The other participants in today’s roundtable were Reza Kaleel, Chief Executive Southeast Washington Service Area Kadlec and Providence St. Mary; Regina Ahl, Director of Pharmacy, Tri-Cities Community Health; Dr. John Matheson, Chief Medical Officer, Kadlec Regional Medical Center; and Everett Maroon, Executive Director, Blue Mountain Heart to Heart.       
    Video of today’s entire press conference is HERE; video of Sen. Cantwell’s opening statement is HERE; photos are HERE; and a transcript of Sen. Cantwell’s opening statement is HERE.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI China: China to improve quality, expand capacity of ‘silver economy’

    Source: China State Council Information Office 2

    An elderly couple watch wedding dress photos shot by their nursing home in Changzhou, east China’s Jiangsu province, Jan. 9, 2024. [Photo/Xinhua]
    China will redouble its efforts to improve the quality and expand the capacity of its “silver economy,” namely economic activities related to the country’s large elderly population, Vice Minister of Civil Affairs Tang Chengpei said on Monday.
    These efforts aim to create a positive cycle combining economic development and the improvement of people’s livelihoods, Tang said in his remarks at the China Development Forum 2025, which was held from Sunday to Monday.
    The 10-year period from 2025 to 2035 is an important time window for China to respond proactively to the challenge of population aging, Tang said.
    He outlined efforts to promote the integrated development of the elderly care industry and industries such as culture, tourism, health, sports and domestic services, to expand the scope and scenarios of elderly care services, and to advance home renovation projects offering more elderly-friendly facilities, among other efforts.
    Efforts will also go into making public spaces and e-commerce platforms more senior-friendly, boosting the standardization and supervision of relevant products and services for the elderly, and advancing research and policy support for the development of the “silver economy,” he said.

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI China: Foreign brands benefit from China’s consumption stimulus

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    SHANGHAI, March 25 — As millions of Chinese consumers trade in their devices for the latest models ranging from electric vehicles to home appliances, the rising consumer spending has benefited both Chinese and foreign brands.

    China kicked off large-scale equipment upgrade and consumer goods trade-in programs in March 2024, and revamped these programs earlier this year, amid efforts to boost domestic demand and spur economic growth.

    Prominent foreign brand, Tesla, has benefited from such programs in the sale of its revised Model Y.

    Earlier this month, on the first day of deliveries of the revised Model Y in east China’s Shanghai, more than 500 new vehicles were handed over to buyers, many of whom took advantage of China’s trade-in scheme.

    A resident in Shanghai surnamed Zhang, mentioned that by trading in his old gasoline car and taking advantage of consumption subsidies, he was able to purchase a revised Model Y for about 200,000 yuan (approximately 27,863 U.S. dollars). “The incentives from these subsidy programs are quite significant, which motivated me to place the order,” he said.

    Subsidies vary from place to place. In Guangdong Province in south China, for instance, consumers who buy new energy vehicles can receive subsidies of up to 20,000 yuan.

    Notably, apart from the government’s stimulus policy, Tesla has also taken steps to provide various car purchase incentives, including interest-free financing and insurance subsidy programs, to further lower costs for its customers.

    Foreign firms in the home appliance sector have also benefited from the government program. “The Chinese government’s consumption stimulus policies, including the trade-in program, have increased consumer spending. As a result, sales in Panasonic’s home appliance segment have grown,” Lin Yibin, managing officer of China & Northeast Asia Company of Panasonic Appliances (China) Co., Ltd, told Xinhua in an interview.

    Following the introduction of these policies, sales of Panasonic’s large home appliances from September to December last year, such as washing machines and refrigerators, especially in the offline market, have surpassed figures from the same period of 2023, Lin added.

    In early January this year, China announced a raft of measures to expand the scope of its consumer goods trade-in program. Under the expanded program, categories of home appliances eligible for government subsidies have been increased from eight in 2024 to 12 in 2025.

    “The revamped policy has sparked a surge in consumer spending on home appliances across the country. We are actively working with all parties to benefit from the new policy,” Lin noted.

    These subsidies have helped bring more coffee machines into Chinese homes. In places like Shanghai, Shenzhen and Hubei Province, coffee machines have been added to the list of items eligible for subsidies. De’Longhi, an Italian coffee machine supplier, has benefited from this initiative.

    “Last year, we saw double-digit growth, and since January of this year, we’ve maintained an even higher double-digit growth rate — largely thanks to the consumption stimulus policies,” said Zong Yanping, managing director of De’Longhi Greater China, in an interview with Xinhua.

    “Unlike large home appliances, which have long been essential in Chinese households, coffee machines are still relatively new to many families. Therefore, the purchasing subsidies have been very helpful for us in terms of marketing,” Zong explained.

    Zong is optimistic about China’s market potential, as the consumption stimulus coincided with a shift in coffee-drinking habits in the country, noting that “what began as an occasional social activity has become a morning routine for many young people today.”

    China’s large-scale equipment upgrade and consumer goods trade-in programs have so far yielded fruitful results. In 2024, it drove equipment purchases and investment up by 15.7 percent — contributing 67.6 percent to overall investment growth while boosting sales of bulk durable consumer goods by over 1.3 trillion yuan last year, according to data released by the National Development and Reform Commission in February.

    Vowing to make domestic demand “the main engine and anchor of economic growth,” China’s policymakers during this year’s “two sessions” sent fresh and firm signals regarding empowering the country’s vast number of consumers to spend more confidently.

    Following the 2025 “two sessions,” China vowed to implement solid support measures to connect consumer spending to people’s well-being in the latest consumption-promotion plan. The plan outlines the issuance of ultra-long special treasury bonds totaling 300 billion yuan to bolster consumer goods trade-in programs in 2025 — doubling the 2024 figure.

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-Evening Report: Why does my kid eat so well at childcare but not at home?

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Nick Fuller, Clinical Trials Director, Department of Endocrinology, RPA Hospital, University of Sydney

    Maria Symchych/Shutterstock

    If you’ve ever picked up your child from childcare and wondered if they’re living a double life, you’re not alone.

    Parents often receive rave reports from educators about kids’ adventurous eating habits, only to face a different reality at home, when the child who devoured a veggie-packed curry at lunchtime morphs into a fussy eater refusing anything but dinosaur-shaped chicken nuggets.

    While this confusing behaviour is frustrating, it’s completely normal.

    Here’s why it happens and what you can do.

    How kids’ tastes and eating behaviour develops

    To understand why kids eat differently in different settings, we need first to understand two factors that shape their tastes and food preferences:

    1. Genetics. Our hunter-gatherer ancestors developed physiological responses for survival that are embedded in our genes and influence taste preferences from birth. These include developing “food fussiness” – a natural aversion to unfamiliar foods and bitter flavours to avoid ingesting toxins – and learning to seek palatable foods rich in natural sugars, fat and protein to avoid starvation.

    2. Eating environment. As kids grow, their surroundings at mealtimes – namely carers’ eating habits, feeding practices, routines and social cues conveyed – shape what they actually eat and enjoy.

    The interaction between these two factors drives how fussy kids will be, their likes and dislikes and how open they are to new foods.

    Why eating behaviour differs between childcare and home

    The simple reason kids may eat differently at childcare comes down to the eating environment. Here’s what typically makes childcare different to home:

    1. Childcare has strict routines

    Childcare runs to a strict schedule, teaching kids to expect meals and snacks at set times and places. Meals are also planned to ensure kids sit down to eat when they’re hungry, and food is offered for a limited time – factors that help kids focus on eating.

    When mealtimes are less structured at home, it often leads to kids snacking, reducing their appetite at dinnertime. Distractions, like screens, also take kids’ attention away from eating.

    2. Kids are exposed to peer influence and different role models

    Kids are natural copycats, so seeing friends enjoying healthy food makes them more willing to try it. This behaviour is supported by a study showing that seating a preschooler who dislikes a vegetable next to a peer who enjoys it can gradually shift their preference, leading them to eat the previously disliked vegetable.

    Additionally, the social nature of eating in a group setting encourages kids to try new foods and eat more.

    Research also shows carers – who are trained to model enthusiasm for nutritious foods – shape healthy eating habits and help kids learn other valuable behaviours like table manners.

    At home, time constraints and limited knowledge can make it harder for parents to model these same behaviours.

    3. Childcare regularly exposes kids to new foods

    At childcare, meals are carefully planned according to Australian Dietary Guidelines and are focused on exposing kids to new foods regularly and repeatedly to get them comfortable with different tastes and textures.

    At home, busy family lives often lead to repetitive meal routines.

    4. Kids are offered limited choices

    At childcare, meals are planned with military precision and served without negotiation, teaching kids to try to eat what’s provided.

    At home, mealtimes can involve high-stakes negotiations when kids refuse certain foods, leading parents to surrender and offer alternatives – a tactic that only reinforces fussy eating and teaches kids to hold out for favourite foods.

    5. Kids are given some control over what they eat

    Kids have very little control over their daily lives – we’re constantly telling them what to do and when they’ll do it.

    However, one way kids assert control is by refusing to eat certain foods at home.

    Childcare cleverly gives kids the control they seek, encouraging them to serve themselves from shared platters, making them more willing to try new foods.

    6. Kids experience less attention and pressure

    At home, we naturally focus on what our child is eating (and not eating) which makes mealtimes stressful for kids.

    At childcare, kids don’t have an audience watching their every bite, so they feel less pressure, eat more freely and are more willing to try different foods.




    Read more:
    5 picky eating habits – and how to help your child overcome them


    Six ways to bring childcare eating habits home

    1. Stick to a strict routine

    Serve meals around the same time each day and establish snack times, ensuring they’re two hours before mealtimes so your child sits down hungry and ready to eat. Your routine should include putting devices away so your child’s full attention is on eating.

    2. Be a positive role model

    Because kids observe and mimic what they see, if you show enthusiasm for trying new foods and healthy eating your child will do the same.

    3. Get creative

    Take a leaf out of childcare’s book and ensure your child’s plate features different colours, textures and flavours presented in fun ways to capture and hold their interest in new foods.

    And just like childcare, do this regularly, as repeated exposure is key – it can take eight to ten exposures before your child will accept eating a new food.

    4. Limit food choices (but in a fun way)

    Offer limited choices but in a way that gives your child some control, like serving platter-style meals where they can choose what they want.

    Don’t give into food demands. While it’s tempting to offer alternatives when meals are refused, this creates more problems than it solves, reinforcing food fussiness and narrowing their diet.

    5. Encourage independence

    Actively involve your child in meal preparation, asking them to pick healthy recipes, help you shop and complete simple tasks like washing veggies and mixing ingredients. This can make them curious to taste the meal they’ve helped prepare.

    6. Make mealtimes stress-free

    Prioritise sitting down to eat as a family and ensure mealtimes are relaxed and fun – especially when you’re introducing new foods – to create positive associations with healthy eating.

    Nick Fuller is the author of Healthy Parents, Healthy Kids – a clinically proven blueprint to overcoming food fussiness.

    A/Professor Nick Fuller works for the University of Sydney and RPA Hospital and has received external funding for projects relating to the treatment of overweight and obesity. He is the author and founder of the Interval Weight Loss program, and the author of Healthy Parents, Healthy Kids with Penguin Books.

    ref. Why does my kid eat so well at childcare but not at home? – https://theconversation.com/why-does-my-kid-eat-so-well-at-childcare-but-not-at-home-247447

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: expert reaction to UKHSA’s new Priority Pathogens reference tool

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Scientists comment on the UK Health Security Agency’s new Priority Pathogens reference tool for R&D funders.

    Prof Martin Hibberd, Professor of Emerging Infectious Disease, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (LSHTM), said:

    “I am pleased to see a guidance description for pathogens in a UK context being released, and that it will be up-dated yearly. As mentioned in the report, these lists cannot be comprehensive and different perspectives are likely to lead to different conclusions, but it’s release is likely to lead to more widespread consultations and honing of the findings for next year. While all the pathogen families are important, the three identified as priorities (Covid-19; Nipah virus; and avian influenza) are not surprising and I expect perhaps a more detailed, UK specific, priority list next year.”

     

    Darius Hughes, UK General Manager at Moderna, said:

    “This important work directly supports Moderna’s strategic partnership with the UK Government to strengthen national pandemic preparedness. By aligning our scientific innovation with the UKHSA’s priority pathogen list, we can help accelerate the development of vaccines where they are most urgently needed. This ensures our joint efforts are focused, forward-looking, and capable of responding rapidly to emerging biological threats—ultimately supporting the UK’s ambition to lead in global health security and protect public health through sustained innovation and collaboration.”

     

    Prof Miles Carroll, Professor of Emerging Viruses, Pandemic Sciences Institute, University of Oxford, said:

    “This new Priority Pathogen Families R&D Tool from UK Health Security Agency is aligned with similar prioritisation from the UK Vaccines Network and the World Health Organization, but with a UK focus for obvious reasons.

    “The new R&D Tool is consistent with existing evidence, which is helping guide funders, policymakers and scientists on the most urgent research gaps in epidemic and pandemic pathogen threats.  Tools like this are important if we are to develop effective diagnostics, vaccines and treatments to support the UK Biological Security strategy.”

    Prof Robert Read, Professor of Infectious Diseases, University of Southampton, and Editor in Chief, Journal of Infection, said:

    “Lists like this have been made for many years, and they represent an effort to prioritise infections for advisory and funding purposes, ostensibly to align research funding as closely as possible to public health need.  Unfortunately, pathogens emerge or change constantly, and it is difficult to predict big infectious disease problems coming down the line.  For this reason, I think this list is at best pointless, and at worst potentially harmful to the public health.

    “Pointless because the list of viruses is so long that its tricky to name a significant viral pathogen that has not been included.  Potentially harmful because a prescriptive list like this could misdirect funding towards certain infections, and away from problems that need urgently to be solved.  For example, the list of bacteria of concern includes Yersinia pestis (the cause of plague, a massive problem in 14th-18th Century Europe) for which there is now good available treatment and potential vaccine candidates, but does not include Bordetella pertussis (the cause of Whooping Cough) which caused serious problems for the public during 2024 because vaccines remain sub-optimal and antibiotic treatment only works during the early phase.”

    Prof Mark Woolhouse, Professor of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, and Director of the Tackling Infections to Benefit Africa, University of Edinburgh, said:

    “A key recommendation of the UK Covid Inquiry’s Interim Report for Module 1 (Preparedness) was that prior to 2020 the UK was overly focussed on the risk of an influenza pandemic.  When Covid arrived, it took too long to adjust our response to a different threat, which was part of the reason we ended up in lockdown.

    “Since the pandemic, there have been many initiatives to better understand the diversity of pandemic threats that the UK and the world may face in the coming years.  The UKHSA’s pathogen prioritization exercise is a welcome contribution to this global effort.

    “Of the highest priority pathogens identified by the UKHSA, no one could argue with the inclusion of coronaviruses and influenza viruses (the latter being members of the Orthomyxoviridae family).

    “The UKHSA are also right to be concerned about another family of viruses, the Paramyxoviridae.  This is a group that includes the measles virus, itself a continuing cause for concern with large outbreaks regularly reported from around the world.

    “A novel measles-like virus would pose a threat far worse than Covid.  Such a virus would have a much higher R number than the original variants of Covid – making it impossible to control by even the strictest lockdown.  It would also be considerably more deadly, and (unlike Covid) it would be a threat to children.  This is the kind of pandemic that public health agencies around the world are most concerned about.

    “That said, there are many potential kinds of novel pandemic threats – so-called Disease X – and the UKHSA report is a timely reminder that we should not put all our eggs in one basket.  The possibility of different kinds of threat – different transmission routes, different types of disease, different populations at risk – means that our response needs to be scalable, adaptable and quick.  Knowledge, information and data collected in the first few weeks of the next pandemic will be crucial to tailoring our response appropriately.  We need the systems to gather that data in place in advance and ready to be activated, possibly at very short notice.”

    ‘Priority pathogen families research and development (R&D) tool: A reference tool to help guide England-based funders of research and development’ was published by the UK Health Security Agency at 00:01 UK time on Tuesday 25 March 2025.

    Declared interests

    Prof Mark Woolhouse: “I am a consultant for the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovation (CEPI) and a member of the Scottish Committee for Pandemic Preparedness (SCoPP).”

    Prof Martin Hibberd: “I have no conflicts with this topic, but I do work on some of the pathogens listed and have been funded by Industry (most recently J&J) – amongst other government support, to work on them.”

    Prof Miles Carroll: “I consult for PicturaBio diagnostics. I am a member of the WHO R&D BluePrint Pathogen Prioritisation Committee, UKVN, APHA SAB and MRC/UVRI SAB.”

    Darius Hughes: In December 2023, Moderna entered a 10-year strategic partnership with the UK government to establish an mRNA research development and manufacturing facility in the UK. The strategic partnership is managed by the UK Health Security Agency on behalf of the UK government.

    For all other experts, no reply to our request for DOIs was received.

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Final chance to feedback on Auckland Council’s Annual Plan

    Source: Auckland Council

    Aucklanders are encouraged to feed back on Auckland Council’s proposed Annual Plan 2025/2026, before consultation closes on Friday.

    Consultation on the plan closes at 11.59pm on Friday 28 March and all Aucklanders are invited to have their say on the council’s plans for the year ahead.

    The plan focuses on delivering the second year of the Long-term Plan 2024-2034 and the consultation includes an opportunity to feedback on the funding of events and destination marketing, and the priorities of local boards.

    Mayor Wayne Brown says this is the best time for Aucklanders to speak up and have their say on what the council has planned.

    “We want to know what the community thinks of where council is spending their money.  This includes whether they’re keen on a bed night levy to fund major international events, like SailGP, bringing the America’s Cup back to Auckland, concerts like Coldplay and sports events like NRL matches and the ASB tennis classic.

    “These events are important to many, and I do support these events taking place.  We need to hear from the most important people, and that’s Aucklanders. This is the best time to give us your feedback as it will inform the council’s decisions and tell us if we’ve got it right.

    “My message to Aucklanders is simple. It’s your money, so have your say.”

    Auckland Council group chief financial officer Ross Tucker says the Annual Plan is about getting on with what was agreed in the Long-term Plan, including strengthening Auckland both financially and physically, while investing where it is needed most to manage growth.

    “We are prioritising investment in transport, water and fairer funding for local communities,” says Mr Tucker. “There are no significant changes to services or investment levels proposed, compared with what is in the Long-term Plan, and we want to check in with all Aucklanders to make sure plans are still on the right track.”

    So what’s in the draft Annual Plan?

    The plan sets out the council’s proposed services and investments for the coming year and how Auckland Council intends to pay for these, including a 5.8 per cent rates increase for the average value residential property, which is in line with the Long-term Plan.

    Feedback is also sought on major events and destination marketing for the region. To help cover a shortfall in funding that was outlined in the Long-term Plan, the council wants a bed night visitor levy.

    “A bed night visitor levy could help raise $27 million. That would meet the shortfall and fund even more destination management, marketing and major events activities in Auckland,” says Mr Tucker.

    A fairer funding approach will begin to be phased in for the Annual Plan 2025/2026 to enable local boards to better respond to their communities, by addressing funding imbalances between the 21 local boards.

    Each local board’s priorities for the year are included in the Consultation Document.

    Local boards provide a wide range of services such as local parks, libraries, pools, community facilities, and local art and environment activities, along with community events.

    There are some proposed changes to targeted rates, fees and charges – including refuse collection being rolled out in North Shore, Waitākere and Papakura, and targeted rates for refuse in Franklin and Rodney. There are also some changes for fees relating to additional council services, such as dog adoption, cemetery and cremation, and bach fees.

    The Annual Plan 2025/2026 Consultation Document for feedback is available online at akhaveyoursay.nz/ourplan.

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-OSI USA: ICYMI: Shaheen Discusses Foreign Affairs, Trump Tariffs, Her Decision to Not Seek Reelection and More on WMUR’s CloseUp

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for New Hampshire Jeanne Shaheen

    (Manchester, NH) – On Sunday, U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH), Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee, joined Adam Sexton on WMUR’s CloseUp to discuss ongoing global affairs such as Russia’s war in Ukraine, as well as pressing issues in New Hampshire including the harmful impacts of President Trump’s tariffs and Republican-led threats to federal services. The Senator also detailed her decision to not seek reelection. The first segment can be found here and the second segment can be found here.   

    Key quotes from Senator Shaheen below: 

    On threats to U.S. leadership abroad:  

    • “Both ceasefires that this President is talking about taking credit for are falling apart already. The ceasefire in Israel with Gaza has already fallen apart. The ceasefire that he’s trying to broker with Russia has already fallen apart.” 
    • “[Elon Musk] came up with this brilliant idea to get rid of USAID and so has undermined so many of our efforts that help us compete with China around the world. Our efforts that keep Americans safe because we’re tracking epidemics in places like Africa. That promote democracy efforts in countries where, if we’re not there China comes in and takes up that vacuum that we’ve left. So, I think he’s totally misguided, and he has no real understanding of what it means for the United States to be a leader in the world.”  

    On the harmful impact of President Trump’s tariffs on Granite State businesses:  

    • “I was at C&J[…] yesterday. He’s had to cancel more than half of his bus order for new busses that are made in Canada because he’s concerned about the additional cost.” 
    • “I was up north on Wednesday in the North Country, talking to Littleton town officials who were talking about visitors coming down to New Hampshire who they’re concerned are not going to be here, about small businesses that are worried they are not expanding because they’re worried about the inability to have the relationship that they have had with Canada.” 

    On Elon Musk and DOGE’s gutting of federal services: 

    • “We are in this economic mess because of the decisions that President Trump is making about tariffs, about the uncertainty that he’s created, about the chaos that he’s created in Washington, about the layoffs that he’s doing and I want to keep people focused on that.” 
    • “The fact is, Donald Trump, in his campaign said he was going to do something about grocery prices. He was going to do something about inflation. He was going to do something about high energy costs. He was going to do something about the cost of rental housing and he was going to address mortgage rates. He was going to end the war in Ukraine on the first day. He’s done none of those things.” 

    On her decision not to seek reelection: 

    • “It’s time to think about what else I might want to do. I’m not going to leave trying to make a difference in New Hampshire and [I’ll] still be engaged, but it will be nice to have a little more flexibility to do some other things.” 

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Shaheen, Blackburn, Duckworth Introduce Bipartisan Bill to Place a WWII Women’s Memorial on National Mall

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for New Hampshire Jeanne Shaheen

    (Washington, DC) – U.S. Senators Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH), Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) and Tammy Duckworth (D-IL) today introduced the World War II Women’s Memorial Location Act—bipartisan, bicameral legislation to place a memorial honoring women’s contributions to World War II on the National Mall in the nation’s capital. Companion legislation to designate a memorial commemorating the women who worked on the home front to support the efforts of the United States military was introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives by U.S. Congresswoman Debbie Dingell (D-MI-06) and U.S. Congressman Russ Fulcher (R-ID-01). 

    “The monuments and memorials displayed in Washington tell America’s story,” said Senator Shaheen. “The invaluable contributions of ‘Rosie the Riveters’ during World War II are measured not only by the countless American lives they helped save, but also by the generations of women they inspired to serve our nation. Our bipartisan legislation designates a permanent home to memorialize the brave women who worked on the home front during the second world war.” 

     “Over 18 million women served on the home front during World War II, playing a key role in American history. They helped support their country while inspiring future generations of women to join the workforce,” said Senator Blackburn. “A memorial honoring the sacrifice and service of these women should be placed on the National Mall as a powerful reminder of their legacy in fighting for freedom and building the equipment needed by America’s troops during World War II.” 

    “It’s long past time we memorialize the contributions hardworking women made during World War II beside all the other historic memorials on the National Mall,” said Senator Duckworth. “I’m proud our legislation was signed into law to establish a memorial in D.C. to honor the millions of women who rolled up their sleeves and took whatever job was necessary to help move our country forward during World War II. Now, Congress must pass this bipartisan legislation to ensure this memorial is rightfully placed on the National Mall where their legacy can be remembered and preserved prominently for generations to come.” 

    More than 18 million women answered the call to hold down the home front by working as pilots, engineers, electricians, mechanics, code breakers and more during World War II.   

    In 2022, Congress passed bipartisan legislation authorizing the Women Who Worked on the Home Front Foundation to establish a memorial on the National Mall in Washington, DC to commemorate the service and sacrifice of these women to the United States. The legislation introduced by Shaheen, Blackburn and Duckworth would authorize the location of the memorial to be on the National Mall so that it can be built within walking distance of the World War II Memorial.   

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Course charted for carbon free shipping by 2050

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments 2

    Press release

    Course charted for carbon free shipping by 2050

    Our maritime decarbonisation strategy will help us build a cleaner, more resilient maritime nation.

    • vessels will soon use future fuels and plug into shipping ‘chargeports’ as part of UK’s new goals for shipping operators to reach net zero by 2050, part of the government’s Plan for Change to make the UK a clean energy superpower  
    • worst polluting vessels will decarbonise first as government sets out new plans to deliver energy security and build a clean maritime future
    • news comes ahead of the UN’s maritime meeting where the UK mission will push for global greenhouse gas reductions across the industry

    Fuels of the future and shipping charge points in harbours are at the centre of a major new strategy to make Britain’s shipping fleet net zero by 2050 and drive growth in coastal communities.

    The Maritime Minister has today (25 March 2025) revealed the government’s new goals for all vessels that operate in UK waters and dock at UK ports to be carbon free and help vessel owners, operators and scientists make emission-free voyages a reality. 

    Part of the government’s Plan for Change to propel the UK towards becoming a green energy superpower and drive growth, the new Maritime decarbonisation strategy sets out goals to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 30% by 2030, 80% by 2040 and to zero by 2050. This will see the UK match the highest level of the ambitious goals agreed at the International Maritime Organization (IMO) in their 2023 strategy on reduction of greenhouse gas emission from ships.  

    Investment in green technologies and fuels will cement the UK as a clean energy superpower and encourage a green economic revival at the local level, helping to build high-skilled jobs in coastal communities and delivering a local boon to cities and towns.

    Under the new strategy, the shipping sector will be brought under the UK Emissions Trading Scheme (UK ETS). This will see operators of larger vessels such as tankers and cruises – which cause the most pollution – pay more for their greenhouse gas emissions.

    Furthermore, the strategy sets out plans to reduce emissions from shipping and increase the use of clean fuels and technologies, such as hydrogen, electric or ammonia vessels.

    Later today the minister will launch the new strategy in Portsmouth with vessel chargeport pioneer ABB and demonstrate how these new green shipping technologies will bring in private investment, create thousands more jobs and revitalise coastal communities.

    Such investment has already seen growth in coastal regions, with the £206 million of UK SHORE funding having already supported over 300 organisations across every nation and region in the UK and secured over £100 million of private investment, helping to kickstart economic growth.

    Maritime Minister, Mike Kane, said: 

    Climate change is one of the greatest challenges we face today. Working together with industry and international partners, we are driving down emissions in every corner of the economy.

    As part of our Plan for Change, we’re committed to making the UK a green energy superpower and our maritime decarbonisation strategy will help us build a cleaner, more resilient maritime nation.

    In addition, the government is also launching 2 calls for evidence today to help inform the development of measures needed to reduce emissions at berth, understand the future energy demand at ports and decarbonise smaller vessels. 

    Richard Ballantyne OBE, Chief Executive of the British Ports Association, said:

    We welcome today’s announcement. UK ports are already demonstrating their commitment to net zero with ambitious targets and investment in new technologies and fuels. The UK SHORE programme shows what can be achieved when government and industry work together on shared goals.

    We will continue to work closely with the Department for Transport on lowering barriers to investment and decarbonisation for both ports and vessels and this strategy will help set a clear direction and expectations well into the future. We look forward to a continued close partnership built on common aims.

    Chris Shirling-Rooke, Chief Executive of Maritime UK, said:

    Decarbonisation is both an enormous challenge and opportunity for the maritime sector, with huge potential for growth, jobs and innovation in our coastal communities, and across the whole of the United Kingdom.

    It is vital that our country continues to drive change and chase growth by creating a cleaner and more sustainable future. We welcome the government’s commitment today and look forward to continuing to work with them on the maritime decarbonisation strategy.

    Mike Sellers, Director of Portsmouth International Port, said:

    We welcome the announcement of the new maritime decarbonisation strategy, which the port’s master plan very much aligns with.

    To help achieve this ambition, we’re on track to become the UK’s first multi-berth, multi-ship ‘chargeport’ by providing renewable plug-in energy when ships are alongside from spring 2025.

    The seachange shore power project, demonstrates the success of both public and private investment, supported by the government’s zero emissions vessels and infrastructure (ZEVI) fund, driving innovation towards net zero. We’re pleased to show the minister what’s happening in Portsmouth and how this could be a model for ports across the country.

    Rhett Hatcher, CEO of the UK Chamber of Shipping, said:

    The UK Chamber is proud to have led the way on decarbonisation, publicly calling for the global shipping industry to reach net zero emissions by 2050, prior to the UK government and IMO commitments. Across our sector, we have already invested in new technologies and pioneering innovations to meet our commitments and are leading the drive towards net zero. We, therefore, welcome the government’s publication of the maritime decarbonisation strategy, as a much-needed successor to the 2019 clean maritime plan.

    The government’s strategy must now be matched by delivering the regulatory framework, technology and infrastructure, including a shore power revolution, required to support the green transition for UK maritime, bringing benefits to maritime communities and the UK economy. We look forward to working collaboratively alongside government to progress this important agenda and reach our shared goals of a cleaner, more resilient maritime sector in the UK.

    Anna Krajinska, UK Director at Transport & Environment (T&E), said:

    T&E welcomes the government’s commitment to reduce shipping emissions by 30% by 2030, 80% by 2040 and net zero by 2050. It is crucial that ambitious targets are coupled with robust policy measures to slash the UK’s domestic and international shipping emissions without delay.

    Geraint Evans, Chief Executive of the UK Major Ports Group, said:

    Major ports are at the heart of the UK’s transition to net zero, acting as hubs of innovation and supporting the development of future fuels, clean maritime infrastructure, and greener supply chains. Today’s strategy provides much-needed policy certainty for industry, unlocking investment in the technologies and infrastructure that will drive down emissions.

    The successful delivery of the government’s missions relies on strong public and private sector partnerships, and with the right long-term commitment and collaboration, we can accelerate the transition to lower-carbon shipping and ensure the UK remains a global leader in maritime sustainability.

    Mark Dickinson, General Secretary of Nautilus International, said:

    Nautilus International welcomes the government’s ambitious maritime decarbonisation strategy as a crucial step toward building a sustainable future for UK shipping. The targets to achieve zero emissions by 2050, with significant milestones in 2030 and 2040, demonstrate the commitment needed to address the climate emergency that threatens our planet.

    As we transition to new fuels, technologies and vessel designs, we must ensure this green revolution delivers for maritime professionals too. A just transition must be at the heart of these changes – guaranteeing quality jobs, comprehensive training and appropriate upskilling for seafarers who will be operating these new systems. We look forward to working closely with the UK government in achieving a just transition that supports continued economic and employment growth and prosperity for coastal communities as well as all maritime professionals.

    With global shipping accounting for 2% of all emissions, the UK will push for high ambitions at the UN’s next meeting of the International Maritime Organization (IMO) in April, as it develops important measures to reduce emissions from global shipping.

    Maritime media enquiries

    Media enquiries 0300 7777 878

    Switchboard 0300 330 3000

    Updates to this page

    Published 25 March 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: £2 billion new investment to support biggest boost in social and affordable housebuilding in a generation

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments 3

    Press release

    £2 billion new investment to support biggest boost in social and affordable housebuilding in a generation

    Hard working families to get safe and secure homes as Chancellor announces £2 billion injection of new grant funding to deliver up to 18,000 new social and affordable homes.

    • Landmark announcement part of Plan for Change to deliver security for working people by growing the economy and building 1.5 million homes.

    • £2 billion of new funding will only support development on sites that will deliver in this Parliament, getting spades in the ground quickly to build homes in places such as Manchester and Liverpool.

    Helping hard working families get safe and secure homes and kickstarting economic growth are driving the government’s agenda, as the Chancellor and Deputy Prime Minister today (Tuesday 25 March) announced up to 18,000 new social and affordable homes will be built with a £2 billion injection of investment to deliver the Prime Minister’s Plan for Change.

    The announcement hails a significant milestone on the government’s promise to build 1.5 million new homes whilst driving economic growth by getting Britain building again. It follows the government’s plan to inspire the next generation of British engineers, brickies and chippies, by training 60,000 construction workers to tackle skills shortages and get more young people into jobs.

    The £2 billion investment boost comes as a down payment from the Treasury ahead of more long term investment in social and affordable housing planned later this year, which will provide additional funding for 2026-27 and well as for future years. This forms part of the government’s plan for tackling the housing crisis that has held working families back from the stability and security that comes with a safe roof over your head.

    Thousands of new affordable homes will start construction by March 2027 and will complete by the end of this Parliament. The government is encouraging providers to come forwards as soon as possible with projects and bids to ramp up the delivery of new housing supply, in turn making the dream of home ownership a reality for more people across the country.

    Today’s investment will also unlock development and opportunity on sites that are ready and waiting for spades in the ground in places such as Manchester or Liverpool.

    The Chancellor announced plans on a visit to an affordable housing site in Stoke-On-Trent with the Deputy Prime Minister, working hand in hand to deliver the biggest boost to affordable and social housing in a generation.

    Deputy Prime Minister and Housing Secretary, Angela Rayner said:

    Everyone deserves to have a safe and secure roof over their heads and a place to call their own, but the reality is that far too many people have been frozen out of homeownership or denied the chance to rent a home they can afford thanks to the housing crisis we’ve inherited.

    This investment will help us to build thousands more affordable homes to buy and rent and get working people and families into secure homes and onto the housing ladder. This is just the latest in delivering our Plan for Change mission to build 1.5 million homes, and the biggest increase in social and affordable housing in a generation.

    Chancellor of the Exchequer, Rachel Reeves said:

    We are fixing the housing crisis in this country with the biggest boost in social and affordable housebuilding in a generation. Today’s announcement will help drive growth through our Plan for Change by delivering up to 18,000 new homes, as well as jobs and opportunities, getting more money into working people’s pockets.

    At the conclusion of the current Spending Review process on 11 June 2025, the government will announce further long-term investment into the sector in England, delivering the biggest boost to social and affordable housing in a generation.

    Kate Henderson, Chief Executive at the National Housing Federation, says:

    This funding top-up is hugely welcome and demonstrates the government’s commitment to delivering genuinely affordable, social housing for families in need across the country. The additional £2 billion will prevent a cliff edge in delivery of new homes, ahead of the next funding programme being announced.

    Social housing is the only secure and affordable housing for families on low incomes, and the dire shortage has led to rocketing rates of poverty, overcrowding and homelessness. Investment in social housing is not only key to tackling the housing crisis, but is also excellent value for money, reducing government spending on benefits, health, and homelessness as well as boosting growth. Housing associations are ready to work with the government to deliver a generation of new social homes.

    Charlie Nunn, CEO, Lloyds Banking Group said:

    A safe and lasting home is the foundation for good lives and livelihoods, and we welcome this boost to building much-needed social and affordable homes.  As the UK’s biggest commercial supporter of social housing, we’re working across the private, public and community sectors to help increase provision of good quality, genuinely affordable housing for those in need.

    David Thomas, CEO at Barratt Redrow said:

    To increase construction activity and build the homes the UK desperately needs, we need support for demand across all tenures. As well as providing more much-needed affordable homes, this welcome investment will help unlock mixed-tenure developments and to create jobs and economic growth across the country.

    Stephen Teagle, Chair of The Housing Forum said:

    This additional funding signals that the Government is listening to the sector and reaffirms its strong commitment to accelerating the delivery of much-needed affordable housing while driving economic growth. It represents an unprecedented intervention which, when paired with sustained, long-term investment, will be instrumental in meeting the growing demand for affordable homes.

    Now, it’s up to the industry to rise to the challenge — accelerating delivery, building momentum towards the government’s target of 1.5 million new homes, and ensuring we provide the housing this country urgently needs.


    Guidance

    • The majority of this funding will fall in 2026/27, but a tail of funding will cover completions of homes after this. All projects funded through this £2 billion will need to start by March 2027, and will need to finish by June 2029.

    • The funding will be made available to providers on the same terms as the Affordable Homes Programme for 2021-26, and will act as a bridge to the future grant programme to be announced at Spending Review. We will ask Homes England, GLA and bidders to prioritise homes for social rent, in line with the government’s commitment to support this tenure. 

    • Full details of wider long-term and future grant investment will be announced at the Spending Review. At this point we will set out the full funding for 26/27 and beyond, to supplement this down payment of £2 billion.

    Updates to this page

    Published 25 March 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI Security: San Joaquin County Man Sentenced to 15 Years in Prison on Federal Gun and Drug Charges

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    FRESNO, Calif. — Alphonso Jimenez, 34, of Stockton, was sentenced today to 15 years in prison for possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine, cocaine, heroin, and fentanyl and for possessing a firearm during and in relation to a drug trafficking crime, Acting U.S. Attorney Michele Beckwith announced.

    According to court documents, in 2021, a team of local and federal law enforcement officers partnered in an investigation into the drug trafficking activities of Jimenez and co-defendant Erik D. Mendoza-Contreras, 33, of Stockton. On multiple occasions during the investigation, confidential sources working with law enforcement purchased several pounds of narcotics from Mendoza and Jimenez. On Feb. 23, 2022, Jimenez delivered 28 pounds of methamphetamine to Mendoza for further distribution to a customer. A subsequent search of Jimenez’s home recovered 69.2 pounds of methamphetamine, 62.8 pounds of cocaine, 15 pounds of heroin, 9 ounces of counterfeit M-30 pills containing fentanyl, approximately $297,000 in cash, and a firearm.

    This case is the product of an investigation by the Drug Enforcement Administration and the San Joaquin County Metropolitan Narcotics Task Force. Assistant U.S. Attorney Antonio J. Pataca prosecuted the case.

    Charges are pending against Mendoza; he is presumed innocent until and unless proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI USA: ICYMI: Senator Mullin joins President Trump at NCAA Division I Wrestling Championships

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator MarkWayne Mullin (R-Oklahoma)

    ICYMI: Senator Mullin joins President Trump at NCAA Division I Wrestling Championships

    Washington, D.C. – Saturday night, U.S. Senator Markwayne Mullin (R-OK) joined President Trump in Philadelphia, PA at the NCAA Division I Wrestling Championships alongside his wife Christie, and sons Jim, Jayce, and Andrew. President Trump is the first President of the United States to attend the NCAA Division I Wrestling Championships. The Mullin family also proudly cheered on two Oklahoma State wrestlers to victory: Wyatt Hendrickson and Dean Hamiti Jr.

    “President Trump walked in there, they were chanting USA because every single day they know that he’s up there fighting for him.”

    Sen. Mullin’s full recap on Fox & Friends Sunday can be found here.

    On President Trump attending the NCAA Division I Wrestling Championships:

    “It was a huge moment. Just the fact that President Trump took the time to walk into that arena and just share the love of the sport that he truly cares about. Remember Rachel, in 2023 he was in Tulsa with me as well. My boys now, in 2023 they were wrestling in high school, today they wrestle at Oklahoma State and OU. I got three boys all wrestling in college. And it’s just something that we truly love the sport, and President Trump seems to share our same passion for it.” 

    On the crowd’s reaction to President Trump:

    “When the sound of, they say the sound of God, came on the place went absolutely nuts. President Trump came walking in, they’re chanting, USA, USA, USA. You can tell the wrestlers that had already wrestled… were standing up cheering. The President walked over to me, and he says, ‘They absolutely love me here, don’t they?’ I said, ‘Sir, they certainly do.’ And he says, ‘Why do you think that?’ And I said, ‘Sir, every male in this building, and I’d say a lot of females in this building, has been punched in the face. We’re wrestling fans. We do this.’ And I said, ‘They respect a fighter, and they respect you.’

    On the event attendees respecting the fighter that President Trump is:

    “[President Trump] shows every single day that he’s for the people, and from the people. What I mean by that is, tell me if Joe Biden could walk in that room and get a chant like that? They would have been chanting, let’s go Brandon. But when President Trump walked in there, they were chanting USA because every single day they know that he’s up there fighting for him. And the iconic part was… when the assassin’s bullet, missed him, and yet he stood up and put his hand in the air and said, fight, fight, fight. That resonated through everybody. And it resonated through the patriotism through our country too. And then you walk into a wrestling arena like that, where people just love America, they respect a fighter. That’s right at President Trump’s base, and he couldn’t have been more at home in that crowd than, let’s say, myself, or any other wrestler that was participating there.”

    On Oklahoma State wrestler Wyatt Hendrickson:

    “One thing I want to add too is Wyatt Hendrickson is the heavyweight that you guys are talking about that pulled maybe the largest upset of the NCAA, he’s also a graduate from the Air Force Academy. And when President Trump met him three years ago and Wyatt walked up to him, and I was with him, and said, ‘Can I get a waiver to fly jets?’ And the President looked at him and said, ‘Sir, I don’t think they make cockpits that big.’ I mean, just a huge individual. And they actually developed a friendship. And so, President Trump was supposed to leave two matches before Wyatt wrestled, and he looked at me, he says, I can’t leave, I’ve got to watch my big guy. That’s what he called him he said, ‘I got to watch my big guy.’”

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Justice Department Statement on Juliana Case

    Source: US State Government of Utah

    Today, the U.S. Supreme Court denied a petition for certiorari by plaintiffs in Juliana v. United States, a case the Justice Department has consistently defended across three presidential administrations.

    The case, filed in 2015, sought to have courts force the government to implement more stringent, remedial measures related to climate change. The U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon agreed to hear the case. The Justice Department moved to dismiss and sought an interlocutory appeal with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Ninth Circuit remanded the case to the district court with instructions to dismiss. The district court accepted an amended complaint, and the circuit court again instructed for the case to be dismissed. The plaintiffs then filed a petition for certiorari in the Supreme Court.

    “For nearly a decade, lawyers for the plaintiffs in the Juliana case have tied up the United States in litigation, persisting even after the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals twice instructed the case to be dismissed because the plaintiffs lack Article III standing,” said Acting Assistant Attorney General Adam Gustafson of the Justice Department’s Environment and Natural Resources Division (ENRD). “The U.S. Supreme Court’s cert denial brings this long saga to a conclusion. Through ENRD’s work, the Justice Department is enforcing our nation’s environmental laws and safeguarding America’s air, water, and natural resources. Cases like Juliana distract from those enforcement efforts.”

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Security: Justice Department Statement on Juliana Case

    Source: United States Attorneys General 1

    Today, the U.S. Supreme Court denied a petition for certiorari by plaintiffs in Juliana v. United States, a case the Justice Department has consistently defended across three presidential administrations.

    The case, filed in 2015, sought to have courts force the government to implement more stringent, remedial measures related to climate change. The U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon agreed to hear the case. The Justice Department moved to dismiss and sought an interlocutory appeal with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Ninth Circuit remanded the case to the district court with instructions to dismiss. The district court accepted an amended complaint, and the circuit court again instructed for the case to be dismissed. The plaintiffs then filed a petition for certiorari in the Supreme Court.

    “For nearly a decade, lawyers for the plaintiffs in the Juliana case have tied up the United States in litigation, persisting even after the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals twice instructed the case to be dismissed because the plaintiffs lack Article III standing,” said Acting Assistant Attorney General Adam Gustafson of the Justice Department’s Environment and Natural Resources Division (ENRD). “The U.S. Supreme Court’s cert denial brings this long saga to a conclusion. Through ENRD’s work, the Justice Department is enforcing our nation’s environmental laws and safeguarding America’s air, water, and natural resources. Cases like Juliana distract from those enforcement efforts.”

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI USA: Cassidy, Kennedy Applaud President Trump’s Actions Supporting Louisiana Energy, Restoring U.S. Energy Dominance

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Louisiana Bill Cassidy

    WASHINGTON – U.S. Senators Bill Cassidy, M.D. (R-LA) and John Kennedy (R-LA) applauded President Trump’s policies allowing Louisiana’s liquefied natural gas (LNG) sector to thrive. Louisiana plays a critical role in America’s position as a leading LNG exporter, and President Trump’s measures bolstering domestic energy production are reinforcing the United States’ energy dominance.
    “Louisiana is the backbone of America’s LNG export industry, accounting for more than 60 percent of all U.S. LNG exports last year,” wrote the senators. “Under your leadership, the U.S. is positioned to achieve record-breaking LNG exports, reinforcing energy dominance and providing allies with reliable, affordable, and cleaner-burning natural gas.”
    “We look forward to working with you on policies to allow the LNG sector to thrive. Ensuring consistent, predictable policies from the administration and congress will enhance U.S. competitiveness and reinforce our nation’s energy leadership,” concluded the senators.
    Read the full letter here or below:
    Dear President Trump,
    We are writing to highlight the critical role that Louisiana plays in securing America’s position as the world’s leading liquefied natural gas (LNG) exporter. LNG will play a key role in restoring American energy dominance, and our state is ready to increase supply. We appreciate your decision on Day One to reverse the pause on non-FTA LNG export permitting, and we applaud your administration’s decision for Interior Secretary Burgum and Energy Secretary Wright to visit a Louisiana LNG facility as one of their first energy trips.
    Louisiana is the backbone of America’s LNG export industry, accounting for more than 60 percent of all U.S. LNG exports last year. Our state hosts the largest and most advanced liquefaction and export terminals with strategic proximity to prolific natural gas basins such as the Permian, Eagle Ford, and Haynesville, as well as direct access to the Gulf of America for export to our allies. Deep-draft ports, robust pipeline infrastructure, and skilled workforce across Louisiana makes the Gulf Coast irreplaceable in delivering U.S. energy to the world. Under your leadership, the U.S. is positioned to achieve record-breaking LNG exports, reinforcing energy dominance and providing allies with reliable, affordable, and cleaner-burning natural gas.
    We are proud that our existing LNG export facilities including Cheniere’s Sabine Pass facility, Cameron LNG, and Venture Global’s Calcasieu Pass and Plaquemines facilities call our state home. We also look forward to welcoming additional LNG facilities in various stages of construction and permitting. One example of a key project in the pipeline is Argent LNG, a facility planned for the strategically located Port Fourchon in Louisiana. In addition to increasing U.S. LNG exports, the facility will support thousands of high-paying jobs in construction and operation. Through long-term contracts and stable supply, facilities like Argent LNG bolster energy security for our country and our allies.
    We look forward to working with you on policies to allow the LNG sector to thrive. Ensuring consistent, predictable policies from the administration and congress will enhance U.S. competitiveness and reinforce our nation’s energy leadership.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI China: China to improve quality, expand capacity of ‘silver economy’ for elderly

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    BEIJING, March 24 — China will redouble its efforts to improve the quality and expand the capacity of its “silver economy,” namely economic activities related to the country’s large elderly population, Vice Minister of Civil Affairs Tang Chengpei said on Monday.

    These efforts aim to create a positive cycle combining economic development and the improvement of people’s livelihoods, Tang said in his remarks at the China Development Forum 2025, which was held from Sunday to Monday.

    The 10-year period from 2025 to 2035 is an important time window for China to respond proactively to the challenge of population aging, Tang said.

    He outlined efforts to promote the integrated development of the elderly care industry and industries such as culture, tourism, health, sports and domestic services, to expand the scope and scenarios of elderly care services, and to advance home renovation projects offering more elderly-friendly facilities, among other efforts.

    Efforts will also go into making public spaces and e-commerce platforms more senior-friendly, boosting the standardization and supervision of relevant products and services for the elderly, and advancing research and policy support for the development of the “silver economy,” he said.

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI China: Peng Liyuan calls for global efforts to end TB epidemic

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    BEIJING, March 24 — Peng Liyuan, wife of Chinese President Xi Jinping and also the World Health Organization (WHO) goodwill ambassador for tuberculosis (TB) and HIV/AIDS, on Monday called on the international community to commit more, invest more and deliver more on global TB prevention and treatment.

    In a written statement to the WHO World TB Day 2025, Peng said that with the powerful drive of the WHO and sustained efforts of the international community, notable progress has been achieved in the global fight against TB, and 79 million lives have been saved since 2000.

    It is of great significance that the WHO hosted the virtual meeting to encourage discussions on “Commit, Invest, Deliver,” rally the strength of all parties to tackle the public health challenge of TB, and make solid strides toward the goal of ending the epidemic, she said.

    Peng said that over the past more than 10 years, she has visited many medical facilities, schools and communities both at home and abroad, and witnessed the encouraging progress in TB response in different parts of the world, especially in China.

    Placing great emphasis on TB prevention and treatment, the Chinese government has included TB response in the Healthy China strategy and formulated a national plan to guide relevant efforts, she said.

    At the same time, China has been committed to facilitating the rapid development of TB control technologies, and made its “patient-centered support and care” more scientific and feasible. Thanks to the tireless work of all those working on TB prevention and treatment, the cure rate of the disease in China has been kept above 90 percent, she said.

    Peng said removing the threat of TB is the shared aspiration of all. But the fight remains difficult and challenging, and achieving the goal of ending TB epidemic is still an arduous task, which requires the international community to come together to commit more, invest more and deliver more.

    Peng pledged to continue to work with all parties to advance TB prevention and treatment, safeguard people’s health with love, and share warmth and kindness with unwavering dedication.

    “Let’s all contribute to building a global community of health for all,” she said.

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI USA News: GREEK INDEPENDENCE DAY: A NATIONAL DAY OF CELEBRATION OF GREEK AND AMERICAN DEMOCRACY, 2025

    Source: The White House

    class=”has-text-align-center”>BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
    A PROCLAMATION

    On March 25, 1821, fueled by the rallying cry, “Freedom or Death,” Greek revolutionaries began a war for independence against the Ottoman Empire.  The hard-fought victory established a sovereign Greek state and a national homeland for Greece.  On the 204th anniversary of Greek Independence Day, we honor this heroic fight for freedom, and the enduring democratic ideals that continue to inspire the world.

     America is inextricably tied to both ancient and modern Greece.  We are tethered by history and tradition, the struggle for self-governance, emancipation, and rebirth.  Our Founding Fathers drew inspiration from Greek philosophers and statesmen to form the tenets of our new Republic, now enshrined in our Constitution.  Our national character has been shaped, in part, by the indelible impact of Greek influence in the arts and architecture, language and literature, and academia and military tradition.  Today, across the United States, generations of Greek Americans infuse our neighborhoods and communities with a rich legacy of cultural traditions, and a heritage of family, faith, hospitality, and civic responsibility.

    Greece is one of our Nation’s oldest friends, strategic partners, and a valued NATO ally.  We appreciate the support of Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis in our economic and diplomatic partnership as we forge opportunities for collaboration in key sectors including energy, science, technology, shipping, logistics, and defense.  The permanent presence of naval forces in Souda Bay and bilateral training events enhance warfighting capabilities and reflect our mutual commitment to joint military cooperation as a cornerstone of security and stability in Europe.

    On this day, we pause to celebrate Hellenic independence, people of Greek heritage worldwide, and the abiding kinship of likeminded nations who cherish democracy, patriotism, prosperity, and peace.

    NOW, THEREFORE, I, DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim March 25, 2025, as Greek Independence Day: A National Day of Celebration of Greek and American Democracy.  I call upon the people of the United States to observe this day with appropriate ceremonies and activities.

    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-fourth day of March, in the year of our Lord two thousand twenty-five, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and forty-ninth.

                                  DONALD J. TRUMP

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA News: IMPOSING TARIFFS ON COUNTRIES IMPORTING VENEZUELAN OIL

    Source: The White House

    class=”has-text-align-left”>By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) (IEEPA), the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code, and in view of the national emergency declared with respect to Venezuela in Executive Order 13692 of March 8, 2015 (Blocking Property and Suspending Entry of Certain Persons Contributing to the Situation in Venezuela), as continued most recently in the notice of February 27, 2025 (Continuation of the National Emergency with Respect to Venezuela), I, DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States of America, find that the actions and policies of the regime of Nicolás Maduro in Venezuela continue to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States.  The activities of the Tren de Aragua gang, a transnational criminal organization originating in Venezuela and designated as a Foreign Terrorist Organization and a Specially Designated Global Terrorist organization, have intensified this threat, as highlighted in Proclamation 10903 of March 14, 2025 (Invocation of the Alien Enemies Act Regarding the Invasion of the United States by Tren De Aragua).  Furthermore, Venezuela’s ongoing destabilizing actions, including its support for illicit activities, necessitate further economic measures to protect United States interests.

    In light of these circumstances, and to address the continued national emergency with respect to Venezuela that forms the basis for Executive Order 13692 and subsequent orders, I hereby order:

    Section 1.  Findings.  (a)  The Tren de Aragua gang, a transnational criminal organization with origins in Venezuela, has been designated as a Foreign Terrorist Organization by the United States due to its extensive involvement in terrorist activities such as kidnapping and violent attacks, including the assassination of a Venezuelan opposition figure, that destabilize communities across the Western Hemisphere.  The prior administration’s open-borders policies facilitated the infiltration of the United States by members of Tren de Aragua, allowing these dangerous criminals to establish a foothold within United States cities and prey upon American citizens. The Maduro regime aided and facilitated the influx of Tren de Aragua members into the United States during the prior administration by failing to control its borders, permitting the gang’s operations to flourish within Venezuela, and refusing to take action against its members, thereby exacerbating the illegal immigration crisis.

    (b)  Existing sanctions on Venezuela, including those imposed in Executive Order 13692, Executive Order 13808 of August 24, 2017 (Imposing Additional Sanctions with Respect to the Situation in Venezuela), Executive Order 13850 of November 1, 2018 (Blocking Property of Additional Persons Contributing to the Situation in Venezuela), and Executive Order 13884 of August 5, 2019 (Blocking Property of the Government of Venezuela), remain in effect.  The actions and policies of the Maduro regime that were the basis for those orders continue to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States.  These actions include:

    (i)    The systematic undermining of democratic institutions through the suppression of free and fair elections and the illegitimate consolidation of power by the regime of Nicolás Maduro;

    (ii)   Endemic economic mismanagement and public corruption at the expense of the Venezuelan people and their prosperity;

    (iii)  The regime’s responsibility for the deepening humanitarian and public health crisis in Venezuela; and

    (iv)   The destabilization of the Western Hemisphere through the forced migration of millions of Venezuelans, imposing significant burdens on neighboring countries.

    Sec. 2.  Imposition of Tariffs.  (a)  On or after April 2, 2025, a tariff of 25 percent may be imposed on all goods imported into the United States from any country that imports Venezuelan oil, whether directly from Venezuela or indirectly through third parties.  Duties imposed by this order will be supplemental to duties on imports already imposed pursuant to IEEPA, section 232 of the Trade Expansion of 1962, section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974, or any other authority.

    (b)  The Secretary of State, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury, the Secretary of Commerce, the Secretary of Homeland Security, and the United States Trade Representative, is hereby authorized to determine in his discretion whether the tariff of 25 percent will be imposed on goods from any country that imports Venezuelan oil, directly or indirectly, on or after April 2, 2025.

    (c)  Once imposed on a country at the Secretary of State’s discretion, the tariff of 25 percent shall expire 1 year after the last date on which the country imported Venezuelan oil, or at an earlier date if the Secretary of Commerce, in consultation with the Secretary of State, the Secretary of the Treasury, the Secretary of Homeland Security, and the United States Trade Representative, so determines at his discretion.  

    Sec. 3.  Administration and Enforcement.  (a)  The Secretary of State, in coordination with the Secretary of the Treasury, the Secretary of Commerce, the Secretary of Homeland Security, and the United States Trade Representative, is hereby authorized to impose the tariffs established by this order.

    (b)  The Secretary of Commerce, in coordination with the Secretary of State and the Attorney General, is hereby authorized to:

    (i)    Determine whether a country has imported Venezuelan oil, directly or indirectly;

    (ii)   Issue regulations, guidance, and determinations as necessary to implement this order;

    (iii)  Coordinate with the heads of other executive departments and agencies to ensure compliance; and

    (iv)   Take any additional actions consistent with applicable law to carry out the purposes of this order.

    (c)  Any prior Presidential Proclamation, Executive Order, or other Presidential directive or guidance that is inconsistent with the direction in this order is hereby terminated, suspended, or modified to the extent necessary to give full effect to this order.

    (d)  Any other Presidential Proclamation, Executive Order, or other Presidential directive or guidance that applies to Venezuela or a country subject to a tariff under section 2 of this order remains in full effect, except to the extent specified in subsection (c) of this section.

    (e)  If the Secretary of State, at his discretion, decides to impose a tariff under section 2 of this order on China, that tariff shall also apply to both the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and the Macau Special Administrative Region, as a measure to reduce the risk of transshipment and evasion.

    Sec. 4.  Reporting and Review.  The Secretary of State and the Secretary of Commerce shall submit periodic reports to the President, within 180 days of the date of this order and no less than every 180 days thereafter, assessing the effectiveness of the tariffs described in this order and the ongoing conduct of the Maduro regime.

    Sec. 5.  Definitions.  For the purposes of this order:

    (a)  The term “Venezuelan oil” means crude oil or petroleum products extracted, refined, or exported from Venezuela, regardless of the nationality of the entity involved in the production or sale of such crude oil or petroleum products.

    (b)  The term “indirectly” includes purchases of Venezuelan oil through intermediaries or third countries where the origin of the oil can reasonably be traced to Venezuela, as determined by the Secretary of Commerce.

    Sec. 6.  Effective Date.  This order is effective at 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time on April 2, 2025.

    Sec. 7.  General Provisions.  (a)  Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:

    (i)   The authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or

    (ii)  The functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

    (b)  This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

    (c)  This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

                                  DONALD J. TRUMP

    THE WHITE HOUSE,

        March 24, 2025.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Quarry Association says Immediate RMA reform needed to avoid quarry material shortages

    Source: Aggregate and Quarry Association of NZ

    The quarry industry warns of shortages and rising prices of foundation materials for housing and infrastructure due to at least two more years of delays in obtaining consents under the Government’s RMA reforms.
    Aggregate and Quarry Association (AQA) CEO Wayne Scott says while quarries support the intent of yesterday’s announcements, it is totally unacceptable to wait until 2027 at the earliest to get any meaningful change in resource consenting.
    He says Government Ministers were told upon taking office that two existing National Policy Statements had drafting flaws stopping quarries from getting consents on land needed to supply the rock, aggregate and sand needed for homes and roads. Over one-third of existing quarries across New Zealand are impacted by the NPS Highly Productive Land.
    “We were told the problems with the flaws in the Highly Productive Land and Indigenous Bio-diversity national policy statements would be fixed,” says Wayne Scott.
    “Yesterday’s announcements show little intent from the Government to address these in a timely manner.”
    He says Ministers appear to believe that introducing the two new RMA bills before the end of the year – and passing them before the 2026 election – will solve all resource consenting and planning issues.
    “The new Natural Environment and Planning Acts will include National Policy Statements and presumably any fixes, then there will be a process for each region to develop a regulatory plan. That’s great but we need action now not in 2027 at the earliest.”
    Wayne Scott says the Government has been repeatedly advised that quarries around much of the country are at capacity and its big infrastructure and housing agenda will soon exceed supply.
    “There may be a view that the Fast-track Approvals Act would sort out issues for quarries. That legislation is very welcome but it’s only going to apply to eight out of a thousand active quarries around New Zealand. “
    He says all other quarries wanting to expand or develop a new site will have to do so under an RMA reform process that will take some years to bed in. In the interim, many will face constraints from two flawed National Policy Statements which two successive Governments promised to fix and both have failed to do so.
    “Quarries are already stretched to meet supply and costs can now only rise. We need urgent attention to resource consenting constraints now,” says Wayne Scott.

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Defence News – NZDF medics prepare for ‘inevitable’ natural disaster

    Source: New Zealand Defence Force

    Around 26 New Zealand Defence Force medics have honed their skills for responding to the range of injuries that might be expected from a destructive weather event striking in the Pacific.

    The exercise was held in Santoft Forest near Whanganui recently.

    Senior Aviation Medical Officer, Squadron Leader Rob Visser, says it’s only a matter of time before the NZDF is asked to respond again to an extreme weather event or natural disaster at home or in the South Pacific and generally, medics are the first to arrive.

    Most years will face some challenge, whether it is an extreme weather event or an earthquake, and climate change is only going to make events more likely, he said.

    “While this is primarily an Air Force medic exercise, we have Navy and Army personnel here as part of the activity, so we can all work to the same doctrines and same game plan for approaching these events,” he said.

    Exercise scenarios were based on what could be expected from a cyclone or earthquake – such as cuts, broken bones, impalings and crush victims, people in shock and even civil unrest.

    “This enables our medics to respond to any situation with a high level of skill and be professional in a challenging environment, delivering care without running water or electricity,” Squadron Leader Visser said.

    Their mission at a disaster was to treat and stabilise patients ready for evacuation – and if the roads were damaged that meant winching by helicopter – so they practised that too: “I was very pleased with the training I witnessed and am confident our medics are ready for any eventuality.”

    A major focus for Humanitarian and Disaster Relief (HADR) has been on building on interoperability within neighbouring countries, he said.

    “There has been clear direction from the Government around supporting Pacific partners, as well as a focus on being able to work closely with partners in the Pacific. The intent is that we not only work well within our own services but also with civilian agencies and partner countries who work alongside us in disaster relief operations.”

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Energy Department Advances Efforts to Lower Costs and Increase Consumer Choice

    Source: US Department of Energy

    WASHINGTON—U.S. Secretary of Energy Chris Wright today announced the Department of Energy (DOE) has further postponed the implementation of three of the Biden-Harris administration’s restrictive mandates on home appliances. These actions, taken in accordance with President Donald Trump’s Executive Order, “Unleashing Prosperity through Deregulation,” marks a key step in lowering costs, enhancing performance, and expanding options for American consumers.

    “Under President Trump’s leadership, the Department of Energy is taking critical steps every day to help American families prosper,” said Secretary Wright. “By removing burdensome regulations put in place by the Biden administration, we are returning freedom of choice to the American people, ensuring consumers can choose the home appliances that work best for their lives and budgets. This power should not belong to the federal government.”

    The Department’s notices officially postpone the effective dates for three home appliance rules:

    • Test Procedures for Central Air Conditioners and Heat Pumps
    • Efficiency Standards for Walk-In Coolers and Freezers
    • Efficiency Standards for Gas Instantaneous Water Heaters

    In addition, under the leadership of President Trump, the Department has officially withdrawn four conservation standards, including standards on electric motors, ceiling fans, dehumidifiers, and external power supplies. This continued commitment to the American people will slash unnecessary red tape and regulations that raise prices, reduce consumer choice, and frustrate the American people.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Padilla, Cortez Masto, Wyden Statement on Reported IRS Plans to Share Sensitive Taxpayer Data to DHS

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Alex Padilla (D-Calif.)

    Padilla, Cortez Masto, Wyden Statement on Reported IRS Plans to Share Sensitive Taxpayer Data to DHS

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — Today, U.S. Senators Alex Padilla (D-Calif.), Ranking Member of the Senate Judiciary Immigration Subcommittee, Catherine Cortez Masto (D-Nev.), and Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) released the following joint statement in response to reports that the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is planning to provide sensitive taxpayer information to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to locate suspected undocumented immigrants:

    “This weekend, it became clear that the Trump Administration is finalizing plans to target and penalize people who are following federal law and contributing to our economy. This agreement between the IRS and DHS — if finalized — will have long-lasting and devastating implications on our economy, taxpayer privacy, immigrant communities, and the rule of law.

    “It’s past time for the Trump Administration to make their plans public. The IRS and DHS must disclose the extent of this agreement and brief Congress immediately.”

    Earlier this month, Padilla, Cortez Masto, and Wyden led a letter to IRS and DHS leadership raising the alarm on reports that DHS and the “Department of Government Efficiency” have illegally requested sensitive taxpayer information from the IRS. So far, the Trump Administration has not responded to their demand for answers about their plans to require the IRS to turn over the home addresses, phone numbers, and email addresses of over 700,000 people.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Interview – ABC Afternoon Briefing

    Source: Historic Cooma Gaol listed on the NSW State Heritage Register

    TOM LOWREY: Earlier I spoke with Federal Education Minister Jason Clare. Jason Clare, thanks for joining Afternoon Briefing.
    JASON CLARE, MINISTER FOR EDUCATION: Thanks for having me.
    LOWREY: The school funding puzzle is now somewhat complete, with Queensland having signed on. With this whole picture now in place, is money the solution to the problems education’s facing broadly? Is that sort of the message here?
    CLARE: It’s two things. It’s funding, but it’s got to be tied to real reform, reforms that are going to help our children who fall behind to catch up at school and to keep up and to finish school. You know, the big challenge that we’re confronting at the moment is the number of kids finishing high school is dropping. Not everywhere, not in the non-government system, but certainly in our public schools. It’s dropped from about 83 per cent about seven or eight years ago down to 73 per cent. And as you know, as everyone watching knows, it’s more important to finish school today than it was when we were at school. We’ve got to turn that around. And that’s why – I was, we have been insistent that this can’t be a blank cheque. This is the biggest investment by the Commonwealth Government in public education ever. It’s worth about $16.5 billion over the next 10 years. But it’s not a blank cheque. It’s tied to the biggest set of reforms to education in decades.
    LOWREY: I wanted to touch on those targets. I think you have a Year 12 completion rate target of around 84 per cent or so by the end of the decade. Is that achievable? That would be a record high.
    CLARE: The key to achieving that is making sure that the young people who are falling behind in primary school get the extra support they need. What NAPLAN data shows us is that the children who fall behind in their first test when they’re eight years old, four out of five of those children are still behind when they sat the NAPLAN test in Year 9. In other words, 80 per cent of the children who are behind when they’re little are still behind when they’re in the middle of high school. They’re the children most likely to not finish high school. What we also know is if you intervene early, if you identify those children early, even before they sit that test, maybe in kindergarten prep year one, and you provide them with extra individualised support, then they can catch up faster. Things like catch-up tutoring, where a child gets taken out of a class of 30 children into a class with three or four, four days a week for 40 minutes. If it’s done right, then a child can learn as much in six months as they normally learn in 12 months. In other words, they catch up. That’s the sort of real practical reform that’s going to make a difference to help more young people finish high school.
    LOWREY: Yeah. There’s a clause in these agreements that requires, I think evidence-based teaching is the language. For those that don’t know, what are you sort of referring to there? And are you intervening in how teachers should run their classroom?
    CLARE: No. I think the reading wars are over. I think the evidence is now pretty clear about how to teach children to read about all of the techniques that really work. Synthetic phonics is a classic example of that. All of the evidence shows us what works to help young people learn. We’re embedding that in the curriculum, in the university degrees. But this will help to roll that out in classrooms across the nation as well. And state ministers, state governments are doing a lot of the heavy lifting in that regard right across the country.
    LOWREY: Public schools aren’t going to be fully funded nationwide still for some time. There’s still a process to grow the funding to get to that point. And at the same time, we always hear stories about private schools building new pools or orchestra pits, or, I think, someone has a Scottish castle. Is there work to do on the private school funding side of ledger, do you think?
    CLARE: First this is not about building classrooms. It’s about the children in the classrooms. It’s the investment in the children.
    LOWREY: Is there something about school funding?
    CLARE: Yeah, no, absolutely. This takes us back to the work that David Gonski did more than 10 years ago. And he set a formula for how we should fund our schools, private schools and public schools. Private schools are funded at that level that David Gonski said they should be at all those years ago. Public schools aren’t, not until now. That’s why today’s a big day. You know, this is a big deal. No government has ever done this before, ever. This agreement that we’ve now struck with every state and territory means that every public school across the country is going to be funded at that level that David Gonski said they should be at. And it ratchets up year after year after year to get to that level. You know, I’m a kid from a public school in the western suburbs of Sydney. I’m the first person in my family to finish school, first person in my family to finish Year 10. I’m only here because of the schools I went to, the teachers who taught me. I understand how important it is. This sort of investment tied to these sorts of reforms are going to help kids like the kid I was, the kids that I went to school with. It’s going to help to make sure that every child in the country, wherever they go to school, whether it’s a non-government school or a government school, get the resources and the support that they need to get a great start in life.
    LOWREY: I want to touch on another issue going on in education, higher education. In fact, the US has been reviewing funding agreements with Australian universities. Do you have a picture yet of the impact of those reviews? I think they’re being sent questionnaires almost on their ideological positions to try and justify the funding they’re receiving.
    CLARE: Yeah, we’re starting to get more information. This emerges out of a review that the US Government has initiated into foreign aid and research has been caught in that. We understand that at least seven Australian universities have been affected by this, that they’re conducting research that’s either been suspended or stopped. I’ve asked my department to work with those universities, get more information from other Australian universities about potential research that might be affected. The Australian Embassy in Washington is working with US departments to get a better understanding of this. We expect that the outcomes of that review that the US has initiated will be clearer in the second half of April. 
    Australian universities do great research. To put it in perspective, we’re a nation that represents about 0.3 per cent of the globe’s population, but we do 3 per cent of the world’s research, so we punch above our weight. It’s the reason that countries like the US want to work with us and work with our universities. Ultimately, the US will make their own decisions about the research that they want to fund. But we think it’s worth working with Australia because we’ve got great universities.
    LOWREY: Yeah, look, some of these questions that academics are being asked, things like, can you confirm that your organisation does not work with any party that espouses anti-American beliefs, or that this work is not climate or environmental justice sort of projects. Is that appropriate to be asking Australian academics those kinds of questions about their research? Is it foreign interference even?
    CLARE: No, I don’t think it is. This is US-funded research of US universities working with Australian universities. Ultimately, it’s up to the US about what research it wants to fund. I would advocate for the US to want to work with our universities because they’re some of the best in the world. And that’s why the Australian Embassy is working with US officials to get a better understanding about this issue.
    LOWREY: What’s your advice to those universities? Should they write back? Should they fill in these questionnaires?
    CLARE: They are, they are. I think overwhelmingly, it’s not universities themselves, but it’s individual researchers in our universities that are responding to requests from individual researchers in individual US universities. But it’s not just the universities that are answering these questions. We’re seeking further information from the US.
    LOWREY: Would you consider, or the Australian government consider stepping in to fill the breach if some of this funding is pulled? You mentioned the sort of notable work they’re doing.
    CLARE: No, I don’t think it’s practical for the Australian Government to underwrite this sort of research. But whether it’s the United States or whether it’s Europe or anybody else that collaborates with Australian universities, they know, like we know, that our universities are some of the best in the world. Our researchers are extraordinary. I encourage them to continue the work they’re doing.
    LOWREY: Just quickly on the Budget we’re going to see tomorrow, anything in particular to look out for in the education space? And do you think there’s broadly concerns about the government handing down a big spending budget? Is that what Australians want to see at this point in time, with inflation still a concern?
    CLARE: I think most Australians want to make sure we’re investing in the areas that are going to set us up for the future, and that’s what education does. Three big things in my area. One is cutting the cost of childcare for more than a million Australian families. We announced that almost two years ago, implemented that almost two years ago. That continues to have a big impact for families across the country. For the average family with one child in childcare saves them more than $2,000 a year. Then there’s this, the big investment that we’re making in our schools that are going to help more children to finish high school. We want more young people to be able to finish high school, then go on to TAFE or to university, and that’s where free TAFE comes in. And that’s also where cutting the cost of HECS comes in. We’ve said that if we win the next election, we’ll cut the cost of HECS debt for 3 million Australians by 20 per cent. I’ll give you an example about what that means. The average HECS debt today is about 27 grand. If we win the election, will be able to implement that change that will cut that debt for that individual by $5,500. That’s a lot of money in people’s pockets. You’ll see that in the Budget tomorrow night.
    LOWREY: Just quickly, on your part of the world, in Western Sydney, there’s been a lot of talk about how the conflict in Gaza is cutting through to voters, particularly in your electorate and the electorate surrounding it. Are you concerned that issue might see Labor bleed votes to the Greens and to some high-profile independents as well?
    CLARE: I don’t take any vote for granted. I’ve had the privilege to represent Western Sydney, the area that I grew up, now for a long time. I work my guts out for my community every single day, but I also know that my community is hurting in a way that not every community is. This isn’t a conflict on the other side of the world, for my community it’s much closer to home. The dead bodies that they see on television sometimes are family, they’re relatives, and so it affects my community in a very unique and personal way, and so I’m very conscious of that. My job is to represent my community every single day the best I can, and I’ll continue to do that.
    LOWREY: Jason Clare thanks for joining me. 
    CLARE: Thank you.

    MIL OSI News