Category: housing

  • MIL-Evening Report: The Israel-Hamas ceasefire didn’t resolve any deep-seated issues. Now, it’s shattered

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Marika Sosnowski, Postdoctoral research fellow, The University of Melbourne

    When a ceasefire in the war between Hamas and Israel finally came into effect on January 19, the world breathed a collective sigh of relief.

    However, that ceasefire agreement, and its associated negotiations, have now been cast aside by new Israeli attacks on Gaza.

    A statement from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office said the strikes came after Hamas’ “repeated refusals” to “release our hostages”, and the group’s rejection of all proposals presented by US President Donald Trump’s Middle East envoy, Steve Witkoff.

    Even before Israel cut off all humanitarian aid and electricity to Gaza in the past two weeks, Hamas claimed it had not met the levels of humanitarian aid, shelter and fuel it agreed to provide in the terms of the ceasefire. However, this is a distraction from a larger issue.

    This ceasefire was always more like a strangle contract than a negotiated agreement between equal parties. Israel, as the party with far greater military and political power, has always had the upper hand.

    And while the first phase of the ceasefire, which lasted 42 days, saw the successful release of 33 hostages held by Hamas in exchange for nearly 1,800 Palestinian prisoners, the ceasefire also enabled Israel to use it for its own political and military ends.

    Buying time

    The most common conventional concern about ceasefires is that the parties to a conflict will use them for their own ends.

    Typically, the worry is that non-state armed groups, such as Hamas, will use the halt in violence to buy time to regroup, rearm and rebuild their strength to continue fighting.

    But states such as Israel have this ability, too. Even though they have standing armies that might not need to regroup and rearm in the same way, states can use this time to manoeuvre in the international arena – a space largely denied to non-state actors.

    Trump’s rise to power in the US has seemingly given the Israeli government carte blanche to proceed in ways that were arguably off limits to previous US presidents who were also largely supportive of Israel’s actions.

    This includes the plan of forcing Gaza’s population out of the strip. This plan was raised earlier in the war by Trump advisor Jared Kushner and Israeli officials as a supposed humanitarian initiative.

    Trump has now repeated the call to relocate Palestinians from Gaza to Egypt and Jordan – or possibly other parts of Africa – and for the US to take “ownership” of the coastal strip and turn it into the “Riviera of the Middle East”.

    On the face of it, this plan would be a war crime. But even if it is never fully implemented, the fact it is being promoted by Trump after many years of domestic Israeli and international opprobrium shows how political ideas once thought unacceptable can take on a life of their own.

    Political and military maneouvering

    Israel has also used the ceasefire to pursue larger political and military goals in Gaza, the West Bank, southern Lebanon and Syria.

    Even though the ceasefire did reduce overall levels of violence in Gaza, Israel has continued to carry out attacks on targets in the strip.

    It has also escalated the construction of settlements and carried out increasingly violent operations in the West Bank. In addition, there have been egregious attacks on Palestinian residents in Israel.

    And though nearly 1,800 Palestinian prisoners were released during the ceasefire, Israel was holding more than 9,600 Palestinians in detention on “security grounds” at the end of 2024. Thousands more Palestinians are being held by Israel in administrative detention, which means without trial or charge.

    During the ceasefire, Israel also accelerated efforts to evict the UN agency for Palestinian refugees, UNRWA, from its headquarters in East Jerusalem. And the Israeli government has also proposed increasingly draconian laws aimed at restraining the work of Israeli human rights organisations.

    On the military front, the ceasefire arguably alleviated some pressure on Israel, giving it time to consolidate its territorial and security gains against Hezbollah in southern Lebanon and in Syria.

    In the past two months, two deadlines for the withdrawal of Israeli forces from southern Lebanon passed. Israel has instead proposed establishing a buffer zone on Lebanese territory and has begun destroying villages, uprooting olive trees and building semi-permanent outposts along the border.

    In a speech in February, Netanyahu also demanded the “complete demilitarisation of southern Syria” following the fall of Bashar al-Assad’s regime. And Defence Minister Israel Katz said this month Israel would keep its troops in southern Syria to “protect” residents from any threats from the new Syrian regime.

    Be careful what you wish for

    While Palestinians are known for their sumud – usually translated as steadfastness or tenacity – there is a limit to what humans can endure. The war, and subsequent ceasefires, have created a situation in which Gazans may have to put the survival and wellbeing of themselves and their families above their desire to stay in Palestine.

    There is a general assumption that ceasefires are positive and humanitarian in nature. But ceasefires are not panaceas. In reality, they are a least-worst option for stopping the violence of war for often just a brief period.

    A ceasefire was never going to be the solution to the decades-old conflict between Israel and the Palestinians. Instead, it has turned out to be part of the problem.

    The Conversation

    Marika Sosnowski does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. The Israel-Hamas ceasefire didn’t resolve any deep-seated issues. Now, it’s shattered – https://theconversation.com/the-israel-hamas-ceasefire-didnt-resolve-any-deep-seated-issues-now-its-shattered-249944

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI: UP Fintech Holding Limited Reports Unaudited Fourth Quarter And Full Year 2024 Financial Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    SINGAPORE, March 18, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — UP Fintech Holding Limited (NASDAQ: TIGR) (“UP Fintech” or the “Company”), a leading online brokerage firm focusing on global investors, today announced its unaudited financial results for the fourth quarter and full year ended December 31, 2024.

    Mr. Wu Tianhua, Chairman and CEO of UP Fintech stated: “Both of our financial and operating performance have achieved significant growth in the fourth quarter and the full year of 2024. Total revenue in the fourth quarter reached US$124.1 million, representing a sequential increase of 22.8% and a year-over-year growth of 77.3%. The full year total revenue amounted to US$391.5 million, a 43.7% increase from 2023. Bottom line also largely increased on a GAAP and non-GAAP basis. Net income attributable to ordinary shareholders of UP Fintech in the fourth quarter reached US$28.1 million, representing a quarter-over-quarter growth of 58.0% and compared to a net loss of US$1.8 million in the same quarter of last year. Non-GAAP net income attributable to ordinary shareholders of UP Fintech in the fourth quarter amounted to US$30.5 million, a quarter-over-quarter increase of 51.7% and a year-over-year increase of 2772.5%. The full year net income and non-GAAP net income attributable to ordinary shareholders of UP Fintech in 2024 were US$60.7 million and US$70.5 million, increased 86.5% and 65.0% respectively compared to prior year. We are pleased to see that both our annual and quarterly topline and bottom line have reached an all-time high as we keep executing internationalization strategy and building a resilient business model with healthier operating leverage.

    In the fourth quarter, we added 59,200 customers with deposits, an increase of 17.2% quarter over quarter and 51.4% year over year, bringing our yearly total to 187,400, exceeding our yearly guidance of 150,000. The total number of customers with deposits at the end of 2024 reached 1,092,000, a 20.7% increase compared to 2023 year-end. Additionally, asset inflows remained robust, with a net inflow of US$1.1 billion in the fourth quarter, primarily from retail investors. This was slightly offset by a mark-to-market loss. As a result, the total account balance rose by 2.4% quarter over quarter and 36.4% year over year, reaching a record US$41.7 billion. Over the past three years, the number of customers with deposits and total account balance have achieved compound annual growth rates (“CAGRs”) of 17.5% and 34.7%, respectively.

    We have continued to roll out a range of localized products and features designed to enhance the user experience. In late January, our cryptocurrency platform, YAX (Hong Kong) Limited, received official approval from the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (HKSFC), becoming a licensed virtual asset trading platform (VATP) in Hong Kong. Recently, we officially upgraded our AI investment assistant, TigerGPT to TigerAI and integrated with leading AI models, making it the first brokerage platform globally to incorporate such technology.

    Our corporate business continued to perform well in the fourth quarter of 2024. During this period, we underwrote a total of 14 U.S. and Hong Kong IPOs, including “Mao Geping Company”, “Pony AI Inc.” and “WeRide Inc.”, bringing the total number of U.S. and Hong Kong IPOs underwritten for the year to 44. In our ESOP business, we added 16 new clients in the fourth quarter, bringing the total number of ESOP clients served to 613 as of December 31, 2024.”

    Financial Highlights for Fourth Quarter 2024

    • Total revenues increased 77.3% year-over-year to US$124.1 million.
    • Total net revenues increased 98.9% year-over-year to US$107.4 million.
    • Net income attributable to ordinary shareholders of UP Fintech was US$28.1 million compared to a net loss of US$1.8 million in the same quarter of last year.
    • Non-GAAP net income attributable to ordinary shareholders of UP Fintech was US$30.5 million, compared to a non-GAAP net income of US$1.1 million in the same quarter of last year, an increase of 2772.5%. A reconciliation of non-GAAP financial metrics to the most comparable GAAP metrics is set forth below.

    Financial Highlights for Fiscal Year 2024

    • Total revenues increased 43.7% year-over-year to US$391.5 million.
    • Total net revenues increased 46.6% year-over-year to US$330.7 million.
    • Net income attributable to ordinary shareholders of UP Fintech was US$60.7 million compared to a net income of US$32.6 million in 2023, an increase of 86.5%.
    • Non-GAAP net income attributable to ordinary shareholders of UP Fintech was US$70.5 million, compared to a non-GAAP net income of US$42.7 million in 2023, an increase of 65.0%. A reconciliation of non-GAAP financial metrics to the most comparable GAAP metrics is set forth below.

    Operating Highlights as of Year End 2024

    • Total account balance increased 36.4% year-over-year to US$41.7 billion.
    • Total margin financing and securities lending balance increased 88.2% year-over-year to US$4.5 billion.
    • Total number of customers with deposit increased 20.7% year-over-year to 1,092,000.

    Selected Operating Data for Fourth Quarter 2024

      As of and for the three months ended
      December 31,   September 30,   December 31,
      2023   2024   2024
    In 000’s          
    Number of customer accounts 2,195.7   2,368.0   2,449.3
    Number of customers with deposits 904.6   1,032.8   1,092.0
    Number of options and futures contracts traded 8,044.5   15,261.2   18,926.3
    In USD millions          
    Trading volume 81,765.2   162,990.0   198,016.9
    Trading volume of stocks 19,711.6   41,406.3   55,502.6
    Total account balance 30,597.5   40,763.6   41,725.2
               

    Fourth Quarter 2024 Financial Results

    REVENUES

    Total revenues were US$124.1 million, an increase of 77.3% from US$70.0 million in the same quarter of last year.

    Commissions were US$56.0 million, an increase of 154.9% from US$22.0 million in the same quarter of last year, due to an increase in trading volume.

    Financing service fees were US$2.8 million, a decrease of 12.7% from US$3.2 million in the same quarter of last year, primarily due to a decrease in securities lending activities of our fully disclosed account customers.

    Interest income was US$55.8 million, an increase of 39.6% from US$40.0 million in the same quarter of last year, primarily due to the increase in margin financing and securities lending activities of our consolidated account customers.

    Other revenues were US$9.6 million, an increase of 96.2% from US$4.9 million in the same quarter of last year, primarily due to the increase in IPO subscription incomes and currency exchange incomes.

    Interest expense was US$16.7 million, an increase of 4.6% from US$16.0 million in the same quarter of last year, primarily due to the increase in margin financing activities.

    OPERATING COSTS AND EXPENSES

    Total operating costs and expenses were US$73.1 million, an increase of 39.3% from US$52.5 million in the same quarter of last year.

    Execution and clearing expenses were US$6.1 million, an increase of 171.5% from US$2.2 million in the same quarter of last year due to an increase in our trading volume.

    Employee compensation and benefits expenses were US$37.2 million, an increase of 40.5% from US$26.5 million in the same quarter of last year, primarily due to an increase of global headcount to support our global expansion.

    Occupancy, depreciation and amortization expenses were US$2.1 million, a slight decrease of 2.4% from US$2.2 million in the same quarter of last year.

    Communication and market data expenses were US$11.8 million, an increase of 38.2% from US$8.5 million in the same quarter of last year due to increased IT-related fees.

    Marketing and branding expenses were US$9.5 million, an increase of 64.2% from US$5.8 million in the same quarter of last year, primarily due to higher marketing spending this quarter.

    General and administrative expenses were US$6.4 million, a decrease of 11.8% from US$7.3 million in the same quarter of last year due to a decrease in professional service fees.

    NET LOSS/INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO ORDINARY SHAREHOLDERS OF UP FINTECH

    Net income attributable to ordinary shareholders of UP Fintech was US$28.1 million, as compared to a net loss of US$1.8 million in the same quarter of last year. Net income per ADS – diluted was US$0.158, as compared to a net loss per ADS – diluted of US$0.012 in the same quarter of last year.

    Non-GAAP net income attributable to ordinary shareholders of UP Fintech, which excludes share-based compensation, was US$30.5 million, as compared to a US$1.1 million non-GAAP net income attributable to ordinary shareholders of UP Fintech in the same quarter of last year. Non-GAAP net income per ADS – diluted was US$0.172 as compared to a non-GAAP net income per ADS – diluted of US$0.007 in the same quarter of last year.

    For the fourth quarter of 2024, the Company’s weighted average number of ADSs used in calculating non-GAAP net income per ADS – diluted was 179,173,811. As of December 31, 2024, the Company had a total of 2,640,326,072 Class A and B ordinary shares outstanding, or the equivalent of 176,021,738 ADSs.

    Full Year 2024 Financial Results

    REVENUES

    Total revenues were US$391.5 million, an increase of 43.7% from US$272.5 million in 2023.

    Commissions were US$159.0 million, an increase of 71.8% from US$92.6 million in 2023, due to an increase in trading volume.

    Financing service fees were US$11.3 million, a decrease of 7.1% from US$12.2 million in 2023, primarily due to a decrease in securities lending activities of our fully disclosed account customers.

    Interest income was US$191.8 million, an increase of 28.4% from US$149.3 million in 2023, primarily due to the increase in margin financing and securities lending activities of our consolidated account customers.

    Other revenues were US$29.4 million, an increase of 59.6% from US$18.4 million in 2023, primarily due to the increase in IPO subscription incomes and currency exchange incomes.

    Interest expense was US$60.8 million, an increase of 29.5% from US$47.0 million in 2023, primarily due to the increase in margin financing and securities lending activities.

    OPERATING COSTS AND EXPENSES

    Total operating costs and expenses were US$252.3 million, an increase of 30.9% from US$192.7 million in 2023.

    Execution and clearing expenses were US$14.7 million, an increase of 61.3% from US$9.1 million in 2023 due to an increase in our trading volume.

    Employee compensation and benefits expenses were US$122.4 million, an increase of 21.5% from US$100.8 million in 2023, primarily due to an increase of global headcount to support our global expansion.

    Occupancy, depreciation and amortization expenses were US$8.6 million, a decrease of 8.9% from US$9.4 million in 2023.

    Communication and market data expenses were US$38.9 million, an increase of 26.1% from US$30.8 million in 2023 due to increased IT-related fees.

    Marketing and branding expenses were US$28.5 million, an increase of 36.8% from US$20.9 million in 2023, primarily due to higher marketing spending this year.

    General and administrative expenses were US$39.3 million, an increase of 80.2% from US$21.8 million in 2023 due to an increase in bad debt expense.

    NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO ORDINARY SHAREHOLDERS OF UP FINTECH

    Net income attributable to ordinary shareholders of UP Fintech was US$60.7 million, as compared to a net income of US$32.6 million in 2023. Net income per ADS – diluted was US$0.366, as compared to a net income per ADS – diluted of US$0.207 in 2023.

    Non-GAAP net income attributable to ordinary shareholders of UP Fintech, which excludes share-based compensation, was US$70.5 million, as compared to a US$42.7 million non-GAAP net income attributable to ordinary shareholders of UP Fintech in 2023. Non-GAAP net income per ADS – diluted was US$0.424 as compared to a non-GAAP net income per ADS – diluted of US$0.270 in 2023.

    CERTAIN OTHER FINANCIAL ITEMS

    As of December 31, 2024, the Company’s cash and cash equivalents, term deposits and long-term deposits were US$396.0 million, compared to US$327.7 million as of December 31, 2023.

    As of December 31, 2024, the allowance balance of receivables from customers was US$15.3 million compared to US$1.0 million as of December 31, 2023, which was due to a bad debt provision concerning the recoverability of a specific Hong Kong stock pledge business faced with extreme market situation and significant price drop, leading to a provision for the loan balance.

    Conference Call Information:

    UP Fintech’s management will hold an earnings conference call at 8:00 AM on March 18, 2025, U.S. Eastern Time (8:00 PM on March 18, 2025, Singapore/Hong Kong Time).

    All participants wishing to attend the call must preregister online before they may receive the dial-in numbers. Preregistration may require a few minutes to complete.

    Preregistration Information:

    Please note that all participants will need to pre-register for the conference call, using the link:

    https://register-conf.media-server.com/register/BId5c2bd4696d14e7ba2bc391b87ede751

    It will automatically lead to the registration page of “UP Fintech Holding Limited Fourth Quarter And Full Year 2024 Earnings Conference Call”, where details for RSVP are needed.

    Upon registering, all participants will be provided in confirmation emails with participant dial-in numbers and personal PINs to access the conference call. Please dial in 10 minutes prior to the call start time using the conference access information.

    Additionally, a live and archived webcast of the conference call will be available at https://ir.itigerup.com

    Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures

    In evaluating our business, we consider and use non-GAAP net loss or income attributable to ordinary shareholders of UP Fintech and non-GAAP net loss or income per ADS – diluted as supplemental measures to review and assess our operating performance. The presentation of the non-GAAP financial measures is not intended to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for the financial information prepared and presented in accordance with the United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“U.S. GAAP”). We define non-GAAP net loss or income attributable to ordinary shareholders of UP Fintech as net loss or income attributable to ordinary shareholders of UP Fintech excluding share-based compensation. Non-GAAP net loss or income per ADS – diluted is non-GAAP net loss or income attributable to ordinary shareholders of UP Fintech divided by the weighted average number of diluted ADSs.

    We present these non-GAAP financial measures because they are used by our management to evaluate our operating performance and formulate business plans. Non-GAAP net loss or income attributable to ordinary shareholders of UP Fintech enables our management to assess our operating results without considering the impact of share-based compensation. We also believe that the use of these non-GAAP financial measures facilitates investors’ assessment of our operating performance.

    These non-GAAP financial measures are not defined under U.S. GAAP and are not presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP. These non-GAAP financial measures have limitations as an analytical tool. One of the key limitations of using these non-GAAP financial measures is that they do not reflect all items of income and expenses that affect our operations. Share-based compensation has been and may continue to be incurred in our business and are not reflected in the presentation of non-GAAP net loss or income attributable to ordinary shareholders of UP Fintech. Further, these non-GAAP financial measures may differ from the non-GAAP financial information used by other companies, including peer companies, and therefore their comparability may be limited.

    These non-GAAP financial measures should not be considered in isolation or construed as alternatives to total operating costs and expenses, net loss or income attributable to ordinary shareholders of UP Fintech or any other measure of performance or as an indicator of our operating performance. Investors are encouraged to review these historical non-GAAP financial measures in light of the most directly comparable GAAP measures. These non-GAAP financial measures presented here may not be comparable to similarly titled measures presented by other companies. Other companies may calculate similarly titled measures differently, limiting the usefulness of such measures when analyzing our data comparatively. We encourage investors and others to review our financial information in its entirety and not rely on a single financial measure.

    About UP Fintech Holding Limited

    UP Fintech Holding Limited is a leading online brokerage firm focusing on global investors. The Company’s proprietary mobile and online trading platform enables investors to trade in equities and other financial instruments on multiple exchanges around the world. The Company offers innovative products and services as well as a superior user experience to customers through its “mobile first” strategy, which enables it to better serve and retain current customers as well as attract new ones. The Company offers customers comprehensive brokerage and value-added services, including trade order placement and execution, margin financing, IPO subscription, ESOP management, investor education, community discussion and customer support. The Company’s proprietary infrastructure and advanced technology are able to support trades across multiple currencies, multiple markets, multiple products, multiple execution venues and multiple clearinghouses.

    For more information on the Company, please visit: https://ir.itigerup.com.

    Safe Harbor Statement

    This announcement contains forward−looking statements. These statements are made under the “safe harbor” provisions of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward−looking statements can be identified by terminology such as “may,” “might,” “aim,” “likely to,” “will,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “future,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “estimates” and similar statements or expressions. Among other statements, the business outlook and quotations from management in this announcement, the Company’s strategic and operational plans and expectations regarding growth and expansion of its business lines, and the Company’s plans for future financing of its business contain forward-looking statements. The Company may also make written or oral forward-looking statements in its periodic reports to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on Forms 20−F and 6−K, in its annual report to shareholders, in press releases and other written materials and in oral statements made by its officers, directors or employees to third parties, including the earnings conference call. Statements that are not historical facts, including statements about the Company’s beliefs and expectations, are forward−looking statements. Forward−looking statements involve inherent risks and uncertainties. A number of factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement, including but not limited to the following: the Company’s ability to effectively implement its growth strategies; trends and competition in global financial markets; changes in the Company’s revenues and certain cost or expense accounting policies; and governmental policies and regulations affecting the Company’s industry and general economic conditions in China, Singapore and other countries. Further information regarding these and other risks is included in the Company’s filings with the SEC, including the Company’s annual report on Form 20-F filed with the SEC on April 22, 2024. All information provided in this press release and in the attachments is as of the date of this press release, and the Company undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statement, except as required under applicable law. Further information regarding these and other risks is included in the Company’s filings with the SEC.

    For investor and media inquiries please contact:

    Investor Relations Contact

    UP Fintech Holding Limited

    Email: ir@itiger.com

    UP FINTECH HOLDING LIMITED
    UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
    (All amounts in U.S. dollars (“US$”))

        As of
    December 31,
        As of
    December 31,
     
        2023     2024  
        US$     US$  
    Assets:            
    Cash and cash equivalents   322,599,616     393,576,874  
    Cash-segregated for regulatory purpose   1,617,154,185     2,464,683,625  
    Term deposits   896,683     1,075,260  
    Receivables from customers (net of allowance of US$991,286 and
       US$15,284,002 as of December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2024)
      753,361,199     1,052,972,649  
    Receivables from brokers, dealers, and clearing organizations   541,876,929     2,305,740,507  
    Financial instruments held, at fair value   428,159,554     75,547,082  
    Prepaid expenses and other current assets   17,936,180     17,629,819  
    Amounts due from related parties   7,987,756     16,720,671  
    Total current assets   3,689,972,102     6,327,946,487  
    Non-current assets:            
    Long-term deposits   4,225,412     1,369,994  
    Right-of-use assets   9,067,885     10,880,673  
    Property, equipment and intangible assets, net   16,429,543     15,358,528  
    Goodwill   2,492,668     2,492,668  
    Long-term investments   7,586,483     7,658,809  
    Equity method investment       10,203,622  
    Other non-current assets   5,282,012     6,828,553  
    Deferred tax assets   10,990,998     8,573,135  
    Total non-current assets   56,075,001     63,365,982  
    Total assets   3,746,047,103     6,391,312,469  
    Current liabilities:            
    Payables to customers   2,913,306,558     3,574,651,125  
    Payables to brokers, dealers and clearing organizations   114,771,931     1,914,769,701  
    Accrued expenses and other current liabilities   42,381,946     67,263,254  
    Deferred income-current   819,809      
    Lease liabilities-current   4,133,883     4,153,928  
    Amounts due to related parties   10,148,142     874,331  
    Total current liabilities   3,085,562,269     5,561,712,339  
    Convertible bonds   156,887,691     159,505,397  
    Lease liabilities-non-current   4,777,134     5,902,323  
    Deferred tax liabilities   3,397,831     2,068,661  
    Total liabilities   3,250,624,925     5,729,188,720  
    Mezzanine equity            
    Redeemable non-controlling interest   6,706,660     7,177,668  
    Total Mezzanine equity   6,706,660     7,177,668  
    Shareholders’ equity:            
    Class A ordinary shares   22,528     25,427  
    Class B ordinary shares   976     976  
    Additional paid-in capital   505,448,080     619,030,730  
    Statutory reserve   8,511,039     12,425,463  
    (Accumulated deficit) Retained earnings   (19,600,434 )   37,843,547  
    Treasury Stock   (2,172,819 )   (2,172,819 )
    Accumulated other comprehensive loss   (3,232,993 )   (11,919,310 )
    Total UP Fintech shareholders’ equity   488,976,377     655,234,014  
    Non-controlling interests   (260,859 )   (287,933 )
    Total equity   488,715,518     654,946,081  
    Total liabilities, mezzanine equity and equity   3,746,047,103     6,391,312,469  
    UP FINTECH HOLDING LIMITED
    UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME/(LOSS)
    (All amounts in U.S. dollars (“US$”), except for number of shares (or ADSs) and per share (or ADS) data)
     
        For the three months ended     For the years ended  
        December 31,     September 30,     December 31,     December 31,     December 31,  
        2023     2024     2024     2023     2024  
        US$     US$     US$     US$     US$  
    Revenues:                              
    Commissions   21,954,587     41,207,882     55,964,174     92,593,458     159,045,052  
    Interest related income                              
    Financing service fees   3,174,949     2,803,878     2,770,419     12,178,838     11,311,560  
    Interest income   39,956,315     47,957,486     55,762,091     149,291,006     191,754,746  
    Other revenues   4,895,109     9,084,834     9,605,165     18,444,293     29,430,071  
    Total revenues   69,980,960     101,054,080     124,101,849     272,507,595     391,541,429  
    Interest expense   (15,995,738 )   (15,700,359 )   (16,731,341 )   (46,957,657 )   (60,803,516 )
    Total Net Revenues   53,985,222     85,353,721     107,370,508     225,549,938     330,737,913  
    Operating costs and expenses:                              
    Execution and clearing   (2,244,785 )   (3,518,611 )   (6,095,132 )   (9,084,089 )   (14,651,612 )
    Employee compensation and benefits   (26,458,931 )   (28,769,980 )   (37,163,110 )   (100,750,644 )   (122,365,537 )
    Occupancy, depreciation and amortization   (2,190,610 )   (2,162,704 )   (2,137,586 )   (9,387,056 )   (8,554,315 )
    Communication and market data   (8,532,128 )   (9,730,680 )   (11,787,814 )   (30,831,488 )   (38,893,381 )
    Marketing and branding   (5,790,739 )   (8,223,404 )   (9,507,918 )   (20,859,834 )   (28,530,053 )
    General and administrative   (7,293,530 )   (6,932,672 )   (6,432,737 )   (21,791,263 )   (39,278,674 )
    Total operating costs and expenses   (52,510,723 )   (59,338,051 )   (73,124,297 )   (192,704,374 )   (252,273,572 )
    Other (loss) income:                              
    Others, net   (1,664,053 )   (5,189,945 )   3,469,021     13,148,173     3,299,308  
     (Loss) income before income tax   (189,554 )   20,825,725     37,715,232     45,993,737     81,763,649  
    Income tax expenses   (1,498,639 )   (2,907,080 )   (9,488,084 )   (12,986,310 )   (20,409,721 )
    Net (loss) income   (1,688,193 )   17,918,645     28,227,148     33,007,427     61,353,928  
    Less: net (loss) income attributable to non-controlling interests   (1,293 )   3,353     12,563     (98,285 )   (4,477 )
    Accretion of redeemable non-controlling interests to redemption value   (148,624 )   (160,998 )   (164,328 )   (542,187 )   (630,485 )
    Net (loss) income attributable to ordinary shareholders of UP Fintech   (1,835,524 )   17,754,294     28,050,257     32,563,525     60,727,920  
    Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:                              
    Unrealized loss on available-for-sale investments   (450,325 )       343,892     (450,325 )   343,892  
    Changes in cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment   7,261,631     16,119,046     (17,440,809 )   (545,498 )   (9,022,611 )
    Total Comprehensive income (loss)   5,123,113     34,037,691     11,130,231     32,011,604     52,675,209  
    Less: comprehensive (loss) income attributable to non-controlling interests   (8,222 )   (7,023 )   24,226     (92,526 )   3,121  
    Accretion of redeemable non-controlling interests to redemption value   (148,624 )   (160,998 )   (164,328 )   (542,187 )   (630,485 )
    Total Comprehensive income attributable to ordinary shareholders of UP Fintech   4,982,711     33,883,716     10,941,677     31,561,943     52,041,603  
    Net (loss) income per ordinary share:                              
    Basic   (0.001 )   0.008     0.011     0.014     0.025  
    Diluted   (0.001 )   0.007     0.011     0.014     0.024  
    Net (loss) income per ADS (1 ADS represents 15 Class A ordinary shares):                              
    Basic   (0.012 )   0.113     0.164     0.210     0.379  
    Diluted   (0.012 )   0.110     0.158     0.207     0.366  
    Weighted average number of ordinary shares used in calculating net (loss) income per ordinary share:                              
    Basic   2,336,018,747     2,362,528,627     2,557,911,677     2,325,338,439     2,404,640,854  
    Diluted   2,336,018,747     2,467,241,917     2,687,607,158     2,427,268,831     2,534,097,315  
    Reconciliations of Unaudited Non-GAAP Results of Operations Measures to the Nearest Comparable GAAP Measures
    (All amounts in U.S. dollars (“US$”), except for number of ADSs and per ADS data)


        For the three months ended December 31,
    2023
      For the three months ended September 30,
    2024
      For the three months ended December 31,
    2024
              non-GAAP           non-GAAP           non-GAAP    
        GAAP     Adjustment   non-GAAP   GAAP   Adjustment   non-GAAP   GAAP   Adjustment   non-GAAP
        US$     US$   US$   US$   US$   US$   US$   US$   US$
        Unaudited     Unaudited   Unaudited   Unaudited   Unaudited   Unaudited   Unaudited   Unaudited   Unaudited
              2,896,312 (1)         2,331,274 (1)         2,421,342 (1)  
    Net (loss) income attributable   to ordinary shareholders of UP Fintech   (1,835,524 )   2,896,312   1,060,788   17,754,294   2,331,274   20,085,568   28,050,257   2,421,342   30,471,599
                                           
    Net (loss) income per ADS –  diluted   (0.012 )       0.007   0.110       0.124   0.158       0.172
    Weighted average number of ADSs used in calculating diluted net (loss) income per ADS   155,734,583         157,931,785   164,482,794       164,482,794   179,173,811       179,173,811

    (1) Share-based compensation.

    Reconciliations of Unaudited Non-GAAP Results of Operations Measures to the Nearest Comparable GAAP Measures
    (All amounts in U.S. dollars (“US$”), except for number of ADSs and per ADS data)


        For the year ended December 31,
    2023
      For the year ended December 31,
    2024
            non-GAAP           non-GAAP    
        GAAP   Adjustment   non-GAAP   GAAP   Adjustment   non-GAAP
        US$   US$   US$   US$   US$   US$
        Unaudited   Unaudited   Unaudited   Unaudited   Unaudited   Unaudited
            10,147,362 (1)         9,736,901 (1)  
    Net income attributable to ordinary shareholders of UP Fintech   32,563,525   10,147,362   42,710,887   60,727,920   9,736,901   70,464,821
                             
    Net income per ADS – diluted   0.207       0.270   0.366       0.424
    Weighted average number of ADSs used in calculating diluted net income per ADS   161,817,922       162,607,678   168,939,821       168,939,821

    (1) Share-based compensation.

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI: Nokia unveils two mass-market 25G PON residential fiber ONTs, making large-scale multi-gig and 10G+ viable and affordable

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Press Release
    Nokia unveils two mass-market 25G PON residential fiber ONTs, making large-scale multi-gig and 10G+ viable and affordable

    • New indoor modems deliver speeds up to 20x faster than current gigabit solutions.
    • 25G PON technology is the most cost-effective way to deliver multi-gig and 10G+ residential services, ensuring that advertised speeds can be delivered to all subscribers simultaneously.
    • 25G PON modems have now reached the right price point for residential mass-market deployment.

    18 March 2025
    Amsterdam, Netherlands – Nokia today announced the launch of two new 25G PON fiber modems designed to deliver mass-market, high-speed residential connectivity. The indoor fiber modems provide speeds up to 20 times faster than existing gigabit solutions. 25G PON works on the same fiber network and equipment that operators already use to deliver GPON and 10G PON services. This allows operators to quickly and cost-effectively increase speeds on their network and get the most out of their Fiber-to-the-Home (FTTH) investment.
        
    Demand for multi-gigabit services is growing, moving beyond the enterprise into the home where end-users seek high-speed connectivity for cloud applications, gaming, remote work, and Wi-Fi 7. With 25G PON, operators can turn multi-Gig and 10G+ into mass-market services and know they can reliably deliver advertised speeds to all subscribers, all the time. This proven technology is used by 17 operators, including Google Fiber, Frontier, and Hong Kong Broadband. It provides an easy, cost-effective way to address residential demand for faster broadband speeds.

    The two new residential 25G PON fiber modems complement Nokia’s growing 25G PON portfolio, which includes the Lightspan FX, DF and MF fiber access platforms (OLTs), a 25G PON ONT designed for enterprise applications, and the industry’s first 25G PON sealed fiber access node for cable operators.

    “To support next-gen power users, operators must build future-ready broadband networks that scale beyond 10G. As technology advances, higher-capacity solutions like 25G PON are emerging as a simple, cost-effective way to meet tomorrow’s connectivity demands. With growing competition, differentiation, time-to-market, and scalability will remain critical for providers to stay ahead,” said Jaimie Lenderman, principal analyst at Omdia.   

    “We are investing in all next generation PON technologies including 10/25/50/100G PON, to give operators the best option to meet their needs and their business goals. 25G PON is a proven technology that can be easily activated on our existing 10G XGS-PON solutions. We have close to 2 million 25G-capable ports in the field already. These new 25G PON fiber modems provide a simple, efficient way to boost capacity and stay ahead of growing demands,” said Geert Heyninck, General Manager of Broadband Networks at Nokia.

    Multimedia, technical information and related news 
    Product Page: Nokia 25G PON ONT
    Product Page: Lightspan FX
    Product Page: Lightspan SF-8M sealed fiber access node
    Product Page: Lightspan MF fiber platform
    Web Page: 25G PON

    About Nokia
    At Nokia, we create technology that helps the world act together. 

    As a B2B technology innovation leader, we are pioneering networks that sense, think and act by leveraging our work across mobile, fixed and cloud networks. In addition, we create value with intellectual property and long-term research, led by the award-winning Nokia Bell Labs, which is celebrating 100 years of innovation. 

    With truly open architectures that seamlessly integrate into any ecosystem, our high-performance networks create new opportunities for monetization and scale. Service providers, enterprises and partners worldwide trust Nokia to deliver secure, reliable and sustainable networks today – and work with us to create the digital services and applications of the future.

    Media inquiries 
    Nokia Press Office 
    Email: Press.Services@nokia.com  

    Follow us on social media 
    LinkedIn X Instagram Facebook YouTube 

    Attachments

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: President Lai meets Japan-ROC Diet Members’ Consultative Council Chairman Furuya Keiji

    Source: Republic of China Taiwan

    Details
    2025-03-17
    President Lai addresses opening of 2025 Yushan Forum
    On the morning of March 17, President Lai Ching-te attended the opening of the 2025 Yushan Forum, the theme of which was “New Southbound Policy+: Taiwan, the Indo-Pacific, and a New World.” In remarks, President Lai stated that the New Southbound Policy has led to great success in economic and trade cooperation, professional exchanges, resource sharing, and building regional links. He said that in the past, Taiwanese industries went from moving westward across the Taiwan Strait, to shifting southbound, to working closer with the north, but that now, Taiwan is confidently stepping across the Pacific, reaching eastward, to the Americas and other regions. While staying firmly rooted in Taiwan, he said, Taiwan’s enterprises are expanding their global presence and marketing worldwide. The president stated that Taiwan will strive alongside its partners in democracy to bolster non-red supply chains and digital solidarity, and together respond to the threats and challenges posed by expanding authoritarianism. He indicated that the Yushan Forum is a place to share experiences, and more importantly, lay down firm foundations for exchanges and cooperation among participants’ countries to create greater stability for the region and greater prosperity for the world. A transcript of President Lai’s remarks follows: On behalf of all the people of Taiwan, I want to welcome our good friends joining us from around the world. Your presence shows support for a peaceful and stable Taiwan and a free and open Indo-Pacific region. The Yushan Forum has become more than just an important platform for the New Southbound Policy. Over these eight years, more than 3,600 participants from Taiwan and 28 other countries have helped deepen Taiwan’s connections with nations around the world. The New Southbound Policy has led to great success in economic and trade cooperation, professional exchanges, resource sharing, and building regional links. Looking ahead, the Yushan Forum will be taking on the important mission of carrying its legacy forward and transforming it into action. Not only must we turn consensus into action plans for close cooperation among countries in the region; we must also work with partners around the world to forge ahead with cooperative plans for mutual prosperity. We hope to envision a new world from Taiwan – and see Taiwan in this new world. We are also embracing an era of smart technology. The government sessions of this Yushan Forum are therefore centered around topics including smart healthcare, smart transportation, and resilient supply chains for semiconductors. Taiwan is intent on working side by side with other countries to face the challenges of this new era. Today’s Taiwan celebrates not only the democratic achievements that are recognized by the international community, but also our strengths in the semiconductor and other tech industries, which enable us to play a key role in restructuring global democratic supply chains and the economic order. We are building on Taiwan as a “silicon island” for semiconductors while accelerating innovation and AI applications for industry. These efforts will help Taiwan become an “AI island” as well. We are also developing forward-looking fields such as quantum technology and precision medicine, which will create an industry ecosystem that is highly competitive and innovative. The government will also develop economic models powered by innovation. This will help SMEs (small- and medium-sized enterprises) upgrade and transform through the power of digital transformation and net-zero transition. In the past, Taiwanese industries went from moving westward across the Taiwan Strait, to shifting southbound, to working closer with the north. But now, we are confidently stepping across the Pacific, reaching eastward, to the Americas and other regions. While staying firmly rooted in Taiwan, our enterprises are expanding their global presence and marketing worldwide. Taiwan will continue to engage with the world, and we welcome the world to come closer to Taiwan. As we gather here today, I am confident that we share the same goal: Through international cooperation, we hope to build an even more inclusive, resilient, prosperous Indo-Pacific, while jointly defending the democracy, freedom, and peace we so firmly believe in. I want to thank you all once again for supporting Taiwan. We will strive alongside our partners in democracy to bolster non-red supply chains and digital solidarity, and together respond to the threats and challenges posed by expanding authoritarianism. Yushan is also known as Jade Mountain. It is Taiwan’s highest peak and stands as firm as our unwavering spirit. During this critical time of global change and transformation, the Yushan Forum is a place where we can share our experiences, and more importantly, lay down firm foundations for exchanges and cooperation among our countries. This way, we can create greater stability for the region and greater prosperity for the world. I wish everyone a successful forum. Thank you. Also in attendance at the event were former Prime Minister of Denmark and Alliance of Democracies Foundation Chairman Anders Fogh Rasmussen, former Prime Minister of the Republic of Slovenia Janez Janša, Japan-ROC Diet Members’ Consultative Council Chairman Furuya Keiji, and American Institute in Taiwan Taipei Office Director Raymond Greene.

    Details
    2025-03-13
    President Lai attends Ministry of Foreign Affairs 2025 Spring Banquet  
    On the evening of March 13, President Lai Ching-te attended the Ministry of Foreign Affairs 2025 Spring Banquet for foreign ambassadors and representatives stationed in Taiwan. In remarks, President Lai thanked our diplomatic allies and like-minded countries for continuing to demonstrate their high regard and support for Taiwan at international venues. The president stated that a stronger Taiwan will be able to contribute even more to the world, explaining that is why he established the National Climate Change Committee, the Whole-of-Society Defense Resilience Committee, and the Healthy Taiwan Promotion Committee. He added that he hopes to pool our strengths so as to formulate national development strategies and enhance Taiwan’s international collaboration. The president also expressed hope of developing opportunities for cooperation with other countries across many domains to jointly advance democracy, peace, and prosperity throughout the region and around the world. A translation of President Lai’s remarks follows: Today is my first time attending the Ministry of Foreign Affairs Spring Banquet since becoming president. It is a pleasure to be able to meet and socialize with esteemed guests from other countries and good friends from all sectors of Taiwan. The global landscape has changed rapidly over the past year. Geopolitical volatility, the restructuring of supply chains, technological advancements, and other factors have had a profound impact on nations’ strategic plans. I want to take this opportunity to thank our diplomatic allies and like-minded countries for continuing to demonstrate their high regard and support for Taiwan at international venues. Last month, the leaders of the United States and Japan, the US secretary of state and the foreign ministers of Japan and the Republic of Korea, and the G7 foreign ministers all issued joint statements emphasizing the importance of peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait, underscoring Taiwan’s vital role in global progress and prosperity.  I would especially like to thank members of the diplomatic corps for working with us to build even closer partnerships between our countries. I have always believed that a stronger Taiwan will be able to contribute even more to the world. That is why, after taking office, I established the National Climate Change Committee, the Whole-of-Society Defense Resilience Committee, and the Healthy Taiwan Promotion Committee under the Office of the President. These committees continue to address global concerns and seek to solve important issues that impact our own people. I hope to pool our strengths so as to formulate national development strategies and enhance Taiwan’s international collaboration.  Last year, I visited our Pacific allies – the Republic of the Marshall Islands, Tuvalu, and the Republic of Palau. I deeply appreciated our friends’ warm hospitality and came to feel very deeply that we are like a family. Through local visits and mutual exchanges, we deepened our diplomatic alliances and cooperation, creating win-win outcomes. We also showed Taiwan’s determination to work with allies to tackle the many challenges related to climate change, net-zero transition, and digital transformation. At the start of this month, Taiwan hosted the first-ever workshop on whole-of-society defense resilience under the Global Cooperation and Training Framework. Experts and scholars from 30 countries participated in the discussions. I once again thank the diplomatic corps for their support and assistance. In the future, we look forward to developing opportunities for cooperation with other countries across many domains to jointly advance democracy, peace, and prosperity throughout the region and around the world. In the face of authoritarian expansion, Taiwan will continue to bolster its national defense capabilities. We will stand shoulder to shoulder with fellow democracies to demonstrate the strength of deterrence. We will also join hands to build non-red supply chains, strengthen our economic resilience, and promote an initiative on semiconductor supply chain partnerships for global democracies. All of this will ensure steady technological and economic development.  In my New Year’s Day address, I said that in this new year, we have many more brilliant stories of Taiwan to share with the world. Everyone gathered here tonight is a dear friend of Taiwan. And each of you plays an important role in the stories this land has to tell.  I am deeply grateful to you all for the incredible efforts you make in support of Taiwan. In so many ways, you connect Taiwan to the rest of the world and allow the world to see the many different sides of this amazing nation. I believe that through even deeper and more extensive cooperation, we will create many more wonderful stories of Taiwan and build an even brighter future together. I wish you all a pleasant evening. Also in attendance at the event were Dean of the Diplomatic Corps and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Ambassador Andrea Clare Bowman and other members of the foreign diplomatic corps in Taiwan.

    Details
    2025-03-04
    President Lai meets US Heritage Foundation founder Dr. Edwin Feulner
    On the afternoon of March 4, President Lai Ching-te met with a delegation led by founder of the US-based Heritage Foundation Dr. Edwin Feulner. In remarks President Lai thanked the foundation for publishing the 2025 Index of Economic Freedom, in which Taiwan ranked fourth globally and which recognized Taiwan’s sound legal foundation and ideal investment environment. The president said that Taiwan and the United States are important economic and trade partners and engage closely in industrial exchange. The president also expressed hope to expand investment in and procurement from the US in such areas as high-tech, energy, and agricultural products, and to work with the US and other democratic partners to create more resilient and diverse semiconductor supply chains to address new circumstances. A translation of President Lai’s remarks follows: It is a pleasure to welcome Dr. Feulner back to Taiwan today. I recall meeting with Dr. Feulner and Heritage Foundation President Kevin Roberts here at the Presidential Office at the end of last February. We had a fruitful discussion on Taiwan-US relations and regional affairs. When President Donald Trump was elected for his first term, Dr. Feulner played a crucial role in the administration’s transition team. Today, I look forward to hearing his thoughts on possible ways to further deepen relations between Taiwan and the US. I would like to thank the Heritage Foundation for publishing the 2025 Index of Economic Freedom, in which Taiwan ranked fourth globally. The report also recognized Taiwan’s sound legal foundation and ideal investment environment. Taiwan and the US are important economic and trade partners and engage closely in industrial exchange. The Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company’s (TSMC) historic US$65 billion investment in Arizona–negotiated and finalized during President Trump’s first term–is a case in point. And today, TSMC Chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家) and President Trump jointly announced that the company would be expanding its investment in the US with new facilities. Looking ahead, we hope to expand investment in and procurement from the US in such areas as high-tech, energy, and agricultural products. We also look forward to working with the US and other democratic partners to create more resilient and diverse semiconductor supply chains to address new circumstances. At present, we continue to face authoritarian expansionism. As a country that deeply loves and staunchly defends freedom, Taiwan will collaborate with the US and other like-minded countries to maintain regional peace and stability. I would like to thank President Trump for his recent joint statement with Japanese Prime Minister Ishiba Shigeru, which emphasized the importance of maintaining peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait. And last month, the US was also part of a G7 foreign ministers’ statement in which “they strongly opposed any attempts to change unilaterally the status quo using force.” We firmly believe that only peace attained through one’s own strength can truly be called peace. Currently, Taiwan’s defense budget stands at approximately 2.5 percent of GDP. Going forward, the government will prioritize special budget allocations to ensure that Taiwan’s defense budget exceeds 3 percent of GDP. Also, we will continue to reform national defense in the conviction that help comes most to those who help themselves. This will allow us to contribute even more to regional peace and stability. In closing, I once again thank Dr. Feulner for visiting and for demonstrating support of Taiwan. I wish you all a smooth and successful trip. Dr. Feulner then delivered remarks, first stating that on behalf of his successor, President Roberts, and all of his colleagues at the Heritage Foundation, it is his pleasure to present President Lai with the first copy of the 2025 Index of Economic Freedom. Pointing out that in the Index the Republic of China (Taiwan) is number four of 176 countries around the world in terms of its economic freedom, Dr. Feulner extended his congratulations to President Lai.  Dr. Feulner said he looks forward to a discussion about the present situation and how we can improve relations between the US and Taiwan. Dr. Feulner expressed his gratitude on hearing the wonderful announcement from TSMC, which was released right before his visit, that it will be expanding its investment in the US. In past trips, he said, he has had the opportunity to visit the TSMC headquarters in Taiwan, and fairly recently he has had the opportunity to view the site in Arizona where the construction continues and where the initial operations are beginning. He stated that they are proud to have TSMC now as an integral part of our responsible bilateral relationship. Dr. Feulner noted that while TSMC is of course very big, he also wants to express appreciation for all of the hundreds and hundreds of Taiwan-based companies that are strong, close partners throughout the US with American companies and with American people in terms of making a close and unified alliance of two freedom-loving countries.

    Details
    2025-03-04
    President Lai attends opening ceremony of GCTF Workshop on Whole-of-Society Resilience Building, Preparation, and Response
    On the morning of March 4, President Lai Ching-te attended the opening ceremony of the Global Cooperation and Training Framework (GCTF) Workshop on Whole-of-Society Resilience Building, Preparation, and Response. In remarks, President Lai stated that global challenges such as extreme weather, pandemics, and energy crises continue to emerge, and growing authoritarianism presents a grave threat to freedom-loving countries. These challenges have no borders, he said, and absolutely no single country can face them alone. The president said that as a responsible member of the international community, Taiwan is both willing and able to contribute even more to the democracy, peace, and prosperity of the world, and that the GCTF is an important platform where Taiwan can make those contributions by sharing its experiences with the rest of the world. President Lai indicated that Taiwan will join the forces of the central and local governments to enhance social resilience across the board, enhance disaster response capabilities in the community, and leverage its strengths to make contributions to the international community. He said that we are demonstrating to the world our determination to create an even more resilient Taiwan, and expressed hope to advance mutual assistance and exchanges with all the countries involved, so that we can together promote stability and prosperity around the world. A transcript of President Lai’s remarks follows: To begin, I would like to welcome more than 60 distinguished guests from 30 countries, as well as experts from Taiwan. You are all here for this GCTF workshop to discuss whole-of-society resilience building, preparation, and response. As a responsible member of the international community, Taiwan is both willing and able to contribute even more to the democracy, peace, and prosperity of the world. The GCTF is an important platform where Taiwan can make those contributions by sharing its experiences with the rest of the world. I want to thank our full GCTF partners, the United States, Japan, Australia, and Canada. Over the past several years, we have worked with even more countries through this framework and have expanded our exchanges into even more fields. Together, we have met all kinds of new challenges. I am confident that as our cooperation grows stronger, so will our ability to promote global progress. Each of today’s guests is contributing a vital force in that regard. I extend my sincere thanks to you all. Global challenges such as extreme weather, pandemics, and energy crises continue to emerge. And growing authoritarianism presents a grave threat to freedom-loving countries. These challenges have no borders, and absolutely no single country can face them alone. Taiwan holds a key position on the first island chain, and stands at the very frontline of the defense of democracy. With this joint workshop, we are demonstrating to the world our determination to create an even more resilient Taiwan. We are also aiming to advance our mutual assistance and exchanges with all the countries involved, so that we can make our societies more resilient and together promote stability and prosperity around the world. Moving forward, we will continue advancing the following three initiatives: First, we will join the forces of the central and local governments to enhance social resilience across the board. Just last year, I established the Whole-of-Society Defense Resilience Committee at the Presidential Office. Civilian force training, strategic material preparation, and critical infrastructure operation and maintenance are all key discussion areas for our committee. These aim to enhance Taiwan’s resilience in national defense, economic livelihoods, disaster prevention, and democracy. They are also items on the agenda for this GCTF workshop. To cover all the bases, Taiwan must unite and cooperate as a team. Last year, our committee held the very first cross-sector tabletop exercise at the Presidential Office which included central and local government officials as well as civilian observers. We aim to test the government’s emergency response capabilities in high-intensity gray-zone operations and near-conflict situations. We will continue to hold exercises to help the central and local governments work together more efficiently, and strengthen Taiwan’s overall disaster response capabilities. Second is to enhance disaster response capabilities in the community. We fully understand that to build whole-of-society resilience, we must help people increase risk awareness, know how to respond to disasters, and develop abilities to help themselves, help one another, and work together. We are grateful to the American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) for collaborating with the Taiwan Development Association for Disaster Medical Teams to host “Take Action” workshops around the country since 2021. A 2.0 version is already in practice, and continues to train the public in first aid skills. Director of the AIT Taipei Office Raymond Greene and I took part in a Take Action event in New Taipei City last year and personally saw the positive outcomes of the training. In addition to the Take Action workshops, the government is also providing Disaster Relief Volunteer training for ages 11 to 89, and is continuing to expand its target audience. We have also set up Taiwan Community Emergency Response Teams at key facilities nationwide, enhancing the ability of these important facilities to respond independently to disasters. Civilian training will continue to be refined and expanded so that members of the public can serve as important partners in government-led disaster prevention and relief. Third, we will leverage Taiwan’s strengths to make contributions to the international community. The inspiration for our Disaster Relief Volunteer training comes from a similar program run by The Nippon Care-Fit Education Institute in Japan. I am confident that through exchanges like this workshop, Taiwan and other countries can also inspire one another in many areas, and enhance whole-of-society resilience in multiple ways. Taiwan also excels in information and communications and advanced technology. We will set up even more robust cybersecurity systems, expand usage of emerging technologies, and improve the ways we maintain domestic security. We hope that by leveraging our capabilities and sharing our experiences, Taiwan can contribute even more to the international community. I want to welcome all our partners once again, and thank AIT for co-hosting this event. Let’s continue down the path of advancing global security and developing resilience together. Because together, we can travel farther, and we can travel longer. Also in attendance at the event were Japan-Taiwan Exchange Association Deputy Representative Takaba Yo, Australian Office in Taipei Representative Robert Fergusson, and Canadian Trade Office in Taipei Executive Director Jim Nickel.

    Details
    2025-02-24
    President Lai meets Japanese House of Representatives Member Tamaki Yuichiro
    On the afternoon of February 24, President Lai Ching-te met with Japanese House of Representatives Member Tamaki Yuichiro. In remarks, President Lai noted that Taiwan and Japan are important trading partners. The president expressed hope that, in addition to semiconductors, Taiwan and Japan can also bolster cooperation in the fields of hydrogen energy and drones and build non-red supply chains, thus creating economic win-win situations and maintaining peace and stability in the Indo-Pacific region and globally. A translation of President Lai’s remarks follows: I would like to start by warmly welcoming Representative Tamaki on his first trip to Taiwan. Now is a key moment for the cooperative ties between Taiwan and Japan, and the fact that Representative Tamaki has chosen to take time out of his busy schedule to make this trip demonstrates his especially meaningful support for Taiwan. For this I want to express my deepest gratitude. At the beginning of this month, Japan and the United States held a summit meeting. In the post-summit joint leaders’ statement the government of Japan reiterated the importance of maintaining peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait, opposed any attempts to unilaterally change the status quo by force or coercion, and expressed support for Taiwan’s meaningful participation in international organizations. I would like to thank the government of Japan for these statements. Taiwan and Japan are both responsible members of the international community. I welcome an even firmer friendship between Japan and the US and hope to see cooperation among Taiwan, Japan, and the US become a solid force in consolidating peace and stability in the Indo-Pacific region. In addition to complex international conditions, we now also face the threat of China’s red supply chain. More and more countries are becoming increasingly concerned about such issues as economic security and supply chain resilience. As authoritarianism consolidates, democratic nations must also come closer in solidarity. Taiwan and Japan are important trading partners. I hope that, in addition to semiconductors, Taiwan and Japan can also bolster cooperation in the fields of hydrogen energy and drones, and that we can build non-red supply chains, thus creating economic win-win situations and maintaining peace and stability in the Indo-Pacific region and globally. Lastly, I would like once again to welcome Representative Tamaki to Taiwan and wish him a successful visit. I hope he departs Taiwan with a deep impression and that he will visit again. Representative Tamaki then delivered remarks, noting that this was his first visit to Taiwan and thanking President Lai and officials of the Taiwan government for their warm welcome. Pointing out that Taiwan-Japan ties are closer than ever thanks to the major efforts made on this front by President Lai since taking office, Representative Tamaki expressed his admiration and gratitude. Representative Tamaki pointed out that in a changing global landscape, Taiwan, Japan, and the Indo-Pacific region all face major changes, but he firmly believes that Taiwan-Japan relations will develop even further. Recalling President Lai’s previous remarks, the representative said that Japan and the US recently held a summit meeting that yielded important results. In the joint leaders’ statement, he noted, the two sides made a clear commitment regarding peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait and firmly opposed any attempts to unilaterally change the status quo by force or coercion. Representative Tamaki said that the ruling Liberal Democratic Party and the Komeito did not win a majority in last year’s House of Representatives general elections, while the number of seats held by his own Democratic Party for the People quadrupled. This result, he said, has filled him with a feeling of great responsibility. Moving forward, he intends to continue promoting Taiwan-Japan cooperation and strengthening relations. Also in attendance at the meeting was Japan-Taiwan Exchange Association Taipei Office Chief Representative Katayama Kazuyuki.

    Details
    2025-03-13
    President Lai holds press conference following high-level national security meeting
    On the afternoon of March 13, President Lai Ching-te convened a high-level national security meeting, following which he held a press conference. In remarks, President Lai introduced 17 major strategies to respond to five major national security and united front threats Taiwan now faces: China’s threat to national sovereignty, its threats from infiltration and espionage activities targeting Taiwan’s military, its threats aimed at obscuring the national identity of the people of Taiwan, its threats from united front infiltration into Taiwanese society through cross-strait exchanges, and its threats from using “integrated development” to attract Taiwanese businesspeople and youth. President Lai emphasized that in the face of increasingly severe threats, the government will not stop doing its utmost to ensure that our national sovereignty is not infringed upon, and expressed hope that all citizens unite in solidarity to resist being divided. The president also expressed hope that citizens work together to increase media literacy, organize and participate in civic education activities, promptly expose concerted united front efforts, and refuse to participate in any activities that sacrifice national interests. As long as every citizen plays their part toward our nation’s goals for prosperity and security, he said, and as long as we work together, nothing can defeat us. A translation of President Lai’s remarks follows: At many venues recently, a number of citizens have expressed similar concerns to me. They have noticed cases in which members of the military, both active-duty and retired, have been bought out by China, sold intelligence, or even organized armed forces with plans to harm their own nation and its citizens. They have noticed cases in which entertainers willingly followed instructions from Beijing to claim that their country is not a country, all for the sake of personal career interests. They have noticed how messaging used by Chinese state media to stir up internal opposition in Taiwan is always quickly spread by specific channels. There have even been individuals making careers out of helping Chinese state media record united front content, spreading a message that democracy is useless and promoting skepticism toward the United States and the military to sow division and opposition. Many people worry that our country, as well as our hard-won freedom and democracy and the prosperity and progress we achieved together, are being washed away bit by bit due to these united front tactics. In an analysis of China’s united front, renowned strategic scholar Kerry K. Gershaneck expressed that China plans to divide and conquer us through subversion, infiltration, and acquisition of media, and by launching media warfare, psychological warfare, and legal warfare. What they are trying to do is to sow seeds of discord in our society, keep us occupied with internal conflicts, and cause us to ignore the real threat from outside. China’s ambition over the past several decades to annex Taiwan and stamp out the Republic of China has not changed for even a day. It continues to pursue political and military intimidation, and its united front infiltration of Taiwan’s society grows ever more serious. In 2005, China promulgated its so-called “Anti-Secession Law,” which makes using military force to annex Taiwan a national undertaking. Last June, China issued a 22-point set of “guidelines for punishing Taiwan independence separatists,” which regards all those who do not accept that “Taiwan is part of the People’s Republic of China” as targets for punishment, creating excuses to harm the people of Taiwan. China has also recently been distorting United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2758, showing in all aspects China’s increasingly urgent threat against Taiwan’s sovereignty. Lately, China has been taking advantage of democratic Taiwan’s freedom, diversity, and openness to recruit gangs, the media, commentators, political parties, and even active-duty and retired members of the armed forces and police to carry out actions to divide, destroy, and subvert us from within. A report from the National Security Bureau indicates that 64 persons were charged last year with suspicion of spying for China, which was three times the number of persons charged for the same offense in 2021. Among them, the Unionist Party, Rehabilitation Alliance Party, and Republic of China Taiwan Military Government formed treasonous organizations to deploy armed forces for China. In a democratic and free society, such cases are appalling. But this is something that actually exists within Taiwan’s society today. China also actively plots ways to infiltrate and spy on our military. Last year, 28 active-duty and 15 retired members of the armed forces were charged with suspicion of involvement in spying for China, respectively comprising 43 percent and 23 percent of all of such cases – 66 percent in total. We are also alert to the fact that China has recently used widespread issuance of Chinese passports to entice Taiwanese citizens to apply for the Residence Permit for Taiwan Residents, permanent residency, or the Resident Identity Card, in an attempt to muddle Taiwanese people’s sense of national identity. China also views cross-strait exchanges as a channel for its united front against Taiwan, marking enemies in Taiwan internally, creating internal divisions, and weakening our sense of who the enemy really is. It intends to weaken public authority and create the illusion that China is “governing” Taiwan, thereby expanding its influence within Taiwan. We are also aware that China has continued to expand its strategy of integrated development with Taiwan. It employs various methods to demand and coerce Taiwanese businesses to increase their investments in China, entice Taiwanese youth to develop their careers in China, and unscrupulously seeks to poach Taiwan’s talent and steal key technologies. Such methods impact our economic security and greatly increase the risk of our young people heading to China. By its actions, China already satisfies the definition of a “foreign hostile force” as provided in the Anti-Infiltration Act. We have no choice but to take even more proactive measures, which is my purpose in convening this high-level national security meeting today. It is time we adopt proper preventive measures, enhance our democratic resilience and national security, and protect our cherished free and democratic way of life. Next, I will be giving a detailed account of the five major national security and united front threats Taiwan now faces and the 17 major strategies we have prepared in response. I. Responding to China’s threats to our national sovereignty We have a nation insofar as we have sovereignty, and we have the Republic of China insofar as we have Taiwan. Just as I said during my inaugural address last May, and in my National Day address last October: The moment when Taiwan’s first democratically elected president took the oath of office in 1996 sent a message to the international community, that Taiwan is a sovereign, independent, democratic nation. Among people here and in the international community, some call this land the Republic of China, some call it Taiwan, and some, the Republic of China Taiwan. The Republic of China and the People’s Republic of China are not subordinate to each other, and Taiwan resists any annexation or encroachment upon our sovereignty. The future of the Republic of China Taiwan must be decided by its 23 million people. This is the status quo that we must maintain. The broadest consensus in Taiwanese society is that we must defend our sovereignty, uphold our free and democratic way of life, and resolutely oppose annexation of Taiwan by China. (1) I request that the National Security Council (NSC), the Ministry of National Defense (MND), and the administrative team do their utmost to promote the Four Pillars of Peace action plan to demonstrate the people’s broad consensus and firm resolve, consistent across the entirety of our nation, to oppose annexation of Taiwan by China. (2) I request that the NSC and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs draft an action plan that will, through collaboration with our friends and allies, convey to the world our national will and broad social consensus in opposing annexation of Taiwan by China and in countering China’s efforts to erase Taiwan from the international community and downgrade Taiwan’s sovereignty. II. Responding to China’s threats from infiltration and espionage activities targeting our military (1) Comprehensively review and amend our Law of Military Trial to restore the military trial system, allowing military judges to return to the frontline and collaborate with prosecutorial, investigative, and judicial authorities in the handling of criminal cases in which active-duty military personnel are suspected of involvement in such military crimes as sedition, aiding the enemy, leaking confidential information, dereliction of duty, or disobedience. In the future, criminal cases involving active-duty military personnel who are suspected of violating the Criminal Code of the Armed Forces will be tried by a military court. (2) Implement supporting reforms, including the establishment of a personnel management act for military judges and separate organization acts for military courts and military prosecutors’ offices. Once planning and discussion are completed, the MND will fully explain to and communicate with the public to ensure that the restoration of the military trial system gains the trust and full support of society. (3) To deter the various types of controversial rhetoric and behavior exhibited by active-duty as well as retired military personnel that severely damage the morale of our national military, the MND must discuss and propose an addition to the Criminal Code of the Armed Forces on penalties for expressions of loyalty to the enemy as well as revise the regulations for military personnel and their families receiving retirement benefits, so as to uphold military discipline. III. Responding to China’s threats aimed at obscuring the national identity of the people of Taiwan (1) I request that the Ministry of the Interior (MOI), Mainland Affairs Council (MAC), and other relevant agencies, wherever necessary, carry out inspections and management of the documents involving identification that Taiwanese citizens apply for in China, including: passports, ID cards, permanent residence certificates, and residence certificates, especially when the applicants are military personnel, civil servants, or public school educators, who have an obligation of loyalty to Taiwan. This will be done to strictly prevent and deter united front operations, which are performed by China under the guise of “integrated development,” that attempt to distort our people’s national identity. (2) With respect to naturalization and integration of individuals from China, Hong Kong, and Macau into Taiwanese society, more national security considerations must be taken into account while also attending to Taiwan’s social development and individual rights: Chinese nationals applying for permanent residency in Taiwan must, in accordance with the law of Taiwan, relinquish their existing household registration and passport and may not hold dual identity status. As for the systems in place to process individuals from Hong Kong or Macau applying for residency or permanent residency in Taiwan, there will be additional provisions for long-term residency to meet practical needs. IV. Responding to China’s threats from united front infiltration into Taiwanese society through cross-strait exchanges  (1) There are increasing risks involved with travel to China. (From January 1, 2024 to today, the MAC has received reports of 71 Taiwanese nationals who went missing, were detained, interrogated, or imprisoned in China; the number of unreported people who have been subjected to such treatment may be several times that. Of those, three elderly I-Kuan Tao members were detained in China in December of last year and have not yet been released.) In light of this, relevant agencies must raise public awareness of those risks, continue enhancing public communication, and implement various registration systems to reduce the potential for accidents and the risks associated with traveling to China. (2) Implement a disclosure system for exchanges with China involving public officials at all levels of the central and local government. This includes everyone from administrative officials to elected representatives, from legislators to village and neighborhood chiefs, all of whom should make the information related to such exchanges both public and transparent so that they can be accountable to the people. The MOI should also establish a disclosure system for exchanges with China involving public welfare organizations, such as religious groups, in order to prevent China’s interference and united front activities at their outset. (3) Manage the risks associated with individuals from China engaging in exchanges with Taiwan: Review and approval of Chinese individuals coming to Taiwan should be limited to normal cross-strait exchanges and official interactions under the principles of parity and dignity, and relevant factors such as changes in the cross-strait situation should be taken into consideration. Strict restrictions should be placed on Chinese individuals who have histories with the united front coming to Taiwan, and Chinese individuals should be prohibited from coming to Taiwan to conduct activities related in any way to the united front. (4) Political interference from China and the resulting risks to national security should be avoided in cross-strait exchanges. This includes the review and management of religious, cultural, academic, and education exchanges, which should in principle be depoliticized and de-risked so as to simplify people-to-people exchanges and promote healthy and orderly exchanges. (5) To deter the united front tactics of a cultural nature employed by Chinese nationals to undermine Taiwan’s sovereignty, the Executive Yuan must formulate a solution to make our local cultural industries more competitive, including enhanced support and incentives for our film, television, and cultural and creative industries to boost their strengths in democratic cultural creation, raise international competitiveness, and encourage research in Taiwan’s own history and culture. (6) Strengthen guidance and management for entertainers developing their careers in China. The competent authorities should provide entertainers with guidelines on conduct while working in China, and make clear the scope of investigation and response to conduct that endangers national dignity. This will help prevent China from pressuring Taiwanese entertainers to make statements or act in ways that endanger national dignity. (7) The relevant authorities must adopt proactive, effective measures to prevent China from engaging in cognitive warfare against Taiwan or endangering cybersecurity through the internet, applications, AI, and other such tools. (8) To implement these measures, each competent authority must run a comprehensive review of the relevant administrative ordinances, measures, and interpretations, and complete the relevant regulations for legal enforcement. Should there be any shortcomings, the legal framework for national security should be strengthened and amendments to the National Security Act, Anti-Infiltration Act, Act Governing Relations between the People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area, Laws and Regulations Regarding Hong Kong & Macao Affairs, or Cyber Security Management Act should be proposed. Communication with the public should also be increased so that implementation can happen as soon as possible. V. Responding to threats from China using “integrated development” to attract Taiwanese businesspeople and youth (1) I request that the NSC and administrative agencies work together to carry out strategic structural adjustments to the economic and trade relations between Taiwan and China based on the strategies of putting Taiwan first and expanding our global presence while staying rooted in Taiwan. In addition, they should carry out necessary, orderly adjustments to the flow of talent, goods, money, and skills involved in cross-strait economic and trade relations based on the principle of strengthening Taiwan’s foundations to better manage risk. This will help boost economic security and give us more power to respond to China’s economic and trade united front and economic coercion against Taiwan. (2) I request that the Ministry of Education, MAC, Ministry of Economic Affairs, and other relevant agencies work together to comprehensively strengthen young students’ literacy education on China and deepen their understanding of cross-strait exchanges. I also request these agencies to widely publicize mechanisms for employment and entrepreneurship for Taiwan’s youth and provide ample information and assistance so that young students have more confidence in the nation’s future and more actively invest in building up and developing Taiwan. My fellow citizens, this year marks the 80th anniversary of the end of the Second World War. History tells us that any authoritarian act of aggression or annexation will ultimately end in failure. The only way we can safeguard freedom and prevail against authoritarian aggression is through solidarity. As we face increasingly severe threats, the government will not stop doing its utmost to ensure that our national sovereignty is not infringed upon, and to ensure that the freedom, democracy, and way of life of Taiwan’s 23 million people continues on as normal. But relying solely on the power of the government is not enough. What we need even more is for all citizens to stay vigilant and take action. Every citizen stands on the frontline of the defense of democracy and freedom. Here is what we can do together: First, we can increase our media literacy, and refrain from spreading and passing on united front messaging from the Chinese state. Second, we can organize and participate in civic education activities to increase our knowledge about united front operations and build up whole-of-society defense resilience. Third, we can promptly expose concerted united front efforts so that all malicious attempts are difficult to carry out. Fourth, we must refuse to participate in any activities that sacrifice national interests. The vigilance and action of every citizen forms the strongest line of defense against united front infiltration. Only through solidarity can we resist being divided. As long as every citizen plays their part toward our nation’s goals for prosperity and security, and as long as we work together, nothing can defeat us.

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News

  • MIL-Evening Report: Politics with Michelle Grattan: Barbara Pocock on the Greens’ policy priorities

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra

    The Greens have heaped a lot of pressure on the government during this term, from issues of the environment, housing, and Medicare, to the war in the Middle East.

    With the polls close to a dead heat and minority government appearing a real possibility, would the Greens push a minority Labor government even harder in pursuit of their agenda?

    To talk about the Greens’ policies and prospects, we’re joined by South Australian Greens senator Barbara Pocock, who is the party’s spokeswoman on employment, the public sector and finance.

    After their efforts in this term, Pocock says the Greens would be just as tough in pushing a possible Labor minority government next term:

    People can judge us on our record in the last few years. People saw us really fight hard on housing – we wanted to see something meaningful. It is the most significant post-war crisis in housing that is affecting millions of Australians’ lives and certainly an intergenerational crisis.

    So we held out for a long time to try and push Labor to improve its offering on public housing [and] on housing spending and we achieved some real wins there. We will fight hard for the things that matter.

    We will push very hard on those core issues of a better health system, putting dental into Medicare. We pushed very hard on that in the last time there was a minority government and won it for kids. We want to see everyone be able to get to the dentist, and we really want to see reductions in student debt.

    However, Pocock stresses that keeping Peter Dutton out of government remains a key focus:

    We are very focused on preventing a Dutton Coalition government, because everything we hear from that stable sends a shiver down my spine.

    Pocock did a lot of work during the Senate inquiry investigating consulting services and she warns Dutton’s policy to cut 36,000 public servants would lead to a return to consultants:

    In that last year of the Morrison government, we saw a spend of $20 billion on consulting and labour hire and a hollowing out in the public sector. We are still seeing a slow regrowth of the capability of the federal public sector following the scandals relating to the consulting industry and the way it worked with government.

    I am very worried about the Coalition’s proposals for a 36,000 cut in the public sector. That’s one in five public sector workers gone and that means services like Centrelink, Veterans Affairs, services that Australians depend on cannot deliver on what they suggest. And we also need to remember that a very significant number – something like two-thirds of our public service, federal public service – actually live outside Canberra.

    All they would be doing is taking that money, which pays for public servants, doing a whole range of many different things and taking it across to, in many cases, their supporters and buddies and donors in the consulting and labour hire industry and it’s a very bad value-for-money proposition for the Australian voter.

    As spokeswoman on employment, Pocock is a strong advocate for the Greens policies on a four-day work week:

    If we go right back to 1856 when Australia led the world on reducing working hours, and the eight-hour day, now we were the first to adopt that internationally for stonemasons in Melbourne. And in the last 40 years, [we] have not seen any reduction in average working time. It’s been 38 hours now since 1983. In that 40 years, we’ve seen massive changes in technology. We have seen increases in productivity. And in the last 10 years, we’ve seen private profit increase by 97% while wages have gone up by 50%. And what we’re saying is, let’s look at the length of the average full-time working week and let’s see how we can move the dial on that.

    We’d certainly like to see a wide range of pilots, diverse experimentation, real change, working with those who are ready for it, who are up for it, but making sure we collect the evidence and then move over time towards a national test case, which is the way in which over decades we have slowly ratcheted back the length of the working week.

    On the attack from the opposition and others that the Greens are anti-Semitic, Pocock defends the Greens as an anti-racist party.

    I think there are diverse views out there in the community and certainly, and we can see it every day, but I think that there are also many people, including many Jewish people, who understand that you can have a critique of a war that’s had such a terrible consequence for civilian women and children in Gaza, and you can still take a very strong position in relation to the kinds of attacks we’ve seen on the Jewish community, for example.

    We are an anti-racist party. We want to call out behaviour which is wrong wherever it happens and we have certainly been critical of the behaviour of the Israeli state, their military, and the way they continue to conduct a war against the civilians in Gaza.

    Michelle Grattan does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. Politics with Michelle Grattan: Barbara Pocock on the Greens’ policy priorities – https://theconversation.com/politics-with-michelle-grattan-barbara-pocock-on-the-greens-policy-priorities-252502

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-Evening Report: The Israel-Hamas ceasefire failed to resolve many deep-seated issues. Now, it appears to be shattered

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Marika Sosnowski, Postdoctoral research fellow, The University of Melbourne

    When a ceasefire in the war between Hamas and Israel finally came into effect on January 19, the world breathed a collective sigh of relief.

    However, that ceasefire agreement, and its associated negotiations, have now been cast aside by new Israeli attacks on Gaza.

    A statement from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office said the strikes came after Hamas’ “repeated refusals” to “release our hostages”, and the group’s rejection of all proposals presented by US President Donald Trump’s Middle East envoy, Steve Witkoff.

    Even before Israel cut off all humanitarian aid and electricity to Gaza in the past two weeks, Hamas claimed it had not met the levels of humanitarian aid, shelter and fuel it agreed to provide in the terms of the ceasefire. However, this is a distraction from a larger issue.

    This ceasefire was always more like a strangle contract than a negotiated agreement between equal parties. Israel, as the party with far greater military and political power, has always had the upper hand.

    And while the first phase of the ceasefire, which lasted 42 days, saw the successful release of 33 hostages held by Hamas in exchange for nearly 1,800 Palestinian prisoners, the ceasefire also enabled Israel to use it for its own political and military ends.

    Buying time

    The most common conventional concern about ceasefires is that the parties to a conflict will use them for their own ends.

    Typically, the worry is that non-state armed groups, such as Hamas, will use the halt in violence to buy time to regroup, rearm and rebuild their strength to continue fighting.

    But states such as Israel have this ability, too. Even though they have standing armies that might not need to regroup and rearm in the same way, states can use this time to manoeuvre in the international arena – a space largely denied to non-state actors.

    Trump’s rise to power in the US has seemingly given the Israeli government carte blanche to proceed in ways that were arguably off limits to previous US presidents who were also largely supportive of Israel’s actions.

    This includes the plan of forcing Gaza’s population out of the strip. This plan was raised earlier in the war by Trump advisor Jared Kushner and Israeli officials as a supposed humanitarian initiative.

    Trump has now repeated the call to relocate Palestinians from Gaza to Egypt and Jordan – or possibly other parts of Africa – and for the US to take “ownership” of the coastal strip and turn it into the “Riviera of the Middle East”.

    On the face of it, this plan would be a war crime. But even if it is never fully implemented, the fact it is being promoted by Trump after many years of domestic Israeli and international opprobrium shows how political ideas once thought unacceptable can take on a life of their own.

    Political and military maneouvering

    Israel has also used the ceasefire to pursue larger political and military goals in Gaza, the West Bank, southern Lebanon and Syria.

    Even though the ceasefire did reduce overall levels of violence in Gaza, Israel has continued to carry out attacks on targets in the strip.

    It has also escalated the construction of settlements and carried out increasingly violent operations in the West Bank. In addition, there have been egregious attacks on Palestinian residents in Israel.

    And though nearly 1,800 Palestinian prisoners were released during the ceasefire, Israel was holding more than 9,600 Palestinians in detention on “security grounds” at the end of 2024. Thousands more Palestinians are being held by Israel in administrative detention, which means without trial or charge.

    During the ceasefire, Israel also accelerated efforts to evict the UN agency for Palestinian refugees, UNRWA, from its headquarters in East Jerusalem. And the Israeli government has also proposed increasingly draconian laws aimed at restraining the work of Israeli human rights organisations.

    On the military front, the ceasefire arguably alleviated some pressure on Israel, giving it time to consolidate its territorial and security gains against Hezbollah in southern Lebanon and in Syria.

    In the past two months, two deadlines for the withdrawal of Israeli forces from southern Lebanon passed. Israel has instead proposed establishing a buffer zone on Lebanese territory and has begun destroying villages, uprooting olive trees and building semi-permanent outposts along the border.

    In a speech in February, Netanyahu also demanded the “complete demilitarisation of southern Syria” following the fall of Bashar al-Assad’s regime. And Defence Minister Israel Katz said this month Israel would keep its troops in southern Syria to “protect” residents from any threats from the new Syrian regime.

    Be careful what you wish for

    While Palestinians are known for their sumud – usually translated as steadfastness or tenacity – there is a limit to what humans can endure. The war, and subsequent ceasefires, have created a situation in which Gazans may have to put the survival and wellbeing of themselves and their families above their desire to stay in Palestine.

    There is a general assumption that ceasefires are positive and humanitarian in nature. But ceasefires are not panaceas. In reality, they are a least-worst option for stopping the violence of war for often just a brief period.

    A ceasefire was never going to be the solution to the decades-old conflict between Israel and the Palestinians. Instead, it has turned out to be part of the problem.

    Marika Sosnowski does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. The Israel-Hamas ceasefire failed to resolve many deep-seated issues. Now, it appears to be shattered – https://theconversation.com/the-israel-hamas-ceasefire-failed-to-resolve-many-deep-seated-issues-now-it-appears-to-be-shattered-249944

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-Evening Report: The Israel-Hamas ceasefire didn’t resolve any deep-seated issues. Now, it appears to be shattered

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Marika Sosnowski, Postdoctoral research fellow, The University of Melbourne

    When a ceasefire in the war between Hamas and Israel finally came into effect on January 19, the world breathed a collective sigh of relief.

    However, that ceasefire agreement, and its associated negotiations, have now been cast aside by new Israeli attacks on Gaza.

    A statement from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office said the strikes came after Hamas’ “repeated refusals” to “release our hostages”, and the group’s rejection of all proposals presented by US President Donald Trump’s Middle East envoy, Steve Witkoff.

    Even before Israel cut off all humanitarian aid and electricity to Gaza in the past two weeks, Hamas claimed it had not met the levels of humanitarian aid, shelter and fuel it agreed to provide in the terms of the ceasefire. However, this is a distraction from a larger issue.

    This ceasefire was always more like a strangle contract than a negotiated agreement between equal parties. Israel, as the party with far greater military and political power, has always had the upper hand.

    And while the first phase of the ceasefire, which lasted 42 days, saw the successful release of 33 hostages held by Hamas in exchange for nearly 1,800 Palestinian prisoners, the ceasefire also enabled Israel to use it for its own political and military ends.

    Buying time

    The most common conventional concern about ceasefires is that the parties to a conflict will use them for their own ends.

    Typically, the worry is that non-state armed groups, such as Hamas, will use the halt in violence to buy time to regroup, rearm and rebuild their strength to continue fighting.

    But states such as Israel have this ability, too. Even though they have standing armies that might not need to regroup and rearm in the same way, states can use this time to manoeuvre in the international arena – a space largely denied to non-state actors.

    Trump’s rise to power in the US has seemingly given the Israeli government carte blanche to proceed in ways that were arguably off limits to previous US presidents who were also largely supportive of Israel’s actions.

    This includes the plan of forcing Gaza’s population out of the strip. This plan was raised earlier in the war by Trump advisor Jared Kushner and Israeli officials as a supposed humanitarian initiative.

    Trump has now repeated the call to relocate Palestinians from Gaza to Egypt and Jordan – or possibly other parts of Africa – and for the US to take “ownership” of the coastal strip and turn it into the “Riviera of the Middle East”.

    On the face of it, this plan would be a war crime. But even if it is never fully implemented, the fact it is being promoted by Trump after many years of domestic Israeli and international opprobrium shows how political ideas once thought unacceptable can take on a life of their own.

    Political and military maneouvering

    Israel has also used the ceasefire to pursue larger political and military goals in Gaza, the West Bank, southern Lebanon and Syria.

    Even though the ceasefire did reduce overall levels of violence in Gaza, Israel has continued to carry out attacks on targets in the strip.

    It has also escalated the construction of settlements and carried out increasingly violent operations in the West Bank. In addition, there have been egregious attacks on Palestinian residents in Israel.

    And though nearly 1,800 Palestinian prisoners were released during the ceasefire, Israel was holding more than 9,600 Palestinians in detention on “security grounds” at the end of 2024. Thousands more Palestinians are being held by Israel in administrative detention, which means without trial or charge.

    During the ceasefire, Israel also accelerated efforts to evict the UN agency for Palestinian refugees, UNRWA, from its headquarters in East Jerusalem. And the Israeli government has also proposed increasingly draconian laws aimed at restraining the work of Israeli human rights organisations.

    On the military front, the ceasefire arguably alleviated some pressure on Israel, giving it time to consolidate its territorial and security gains against Hezbollah in southern Lebanon and in Syria.

    In the past two months, two deadlines for the withdrawal of Israeli forces from southern Lebanon passed. Israel has instead proposed establishing a buffer zone on Lebanese territory and has begun destroying villages, uprooting olive trees and building semi-permanent outposts along the border.

    In a speech in February, Netanyahu also demanded the “complete demilitarisation of southern Syria” following the fall of Bashar al-Assad’s regime. And Defence Minister Israel Katz said this month Israel would keep its troops in southern Syria to “protect” residents from any threats from the new Syrian regime.

    Be careful what you wish for

    While Palestinians are known for their sumud – usually translated as steadfastness or tenacity – there is a limit to what humans can endure. The war, and subsequent ceasefires, have created a situation in which Gazans may have to put the survival and wellbeing of themselves and their families above their desire to stay in Palestine.

    There is a general assumption that ceasefires are positive and humanitarian in nature. But ceasefires are not panaceas. In reality, they are a least-worst option for stopping the violence of war for often just a brief period.

    A ceasefire was never going to be the solution to the decades-old conflict between Israel and the Palestinians. Instead, it has turned out to be part of the problem.

    Marika Sosnowski does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. The Israel-Hamas ceasefire didn’t resolve any deep-seated issues. Now, it appears to be shattered – https://theconversation.com/the-israel-hamas-ceasefire-didnt-resolve-any-deep-seated-issues-now-it-appears-to-be-shattered-249944

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Business News ‘Politics & Business’ breakfast

    Source: Australian Government – Minister of Foreign Affairs

    Acknowledgements omitted

    I always enjoy the perspective of Western Australia and Perth which reflect your economic position and your geographic position, so close to Southeast Asia and so engaged with the regional economies.

    I know the business community thinks deeply about what it means to protect and promote Australia’s interests in an increasingly uncertain world.

    I know you think deeply about how we shore up Australia’s prosperity despite that uncertainty. I don,t need to tell this room, Western Australia is vital to that prosperity: when you succeed, the whole country prospers.

    That success includes WA resources, metals, critical minerals and rare earths but it also includes WA manufacturers and workers, your universities, research and technology, which are all globally prized.

    So what’s my role as Foreign Minister? Amongst other things and importantly, it is to help create opportunities, and promote and protect Australia’s interests as a reliable exporter of choice in an increasingly competitive international environment.

    Our foreign policy helps build and maintain the strategic conditions that enable our stability and prosperity.

    And you have to say that is a task that is not getting any easier.

    Each day, our assumptions are being tested.

    We live in a world of increasing strategic surprise. We live in a world that is ever more uncertain and unpredictable.

    We see the devastating human toll of conflicts including in Ukraine, Gaza and Sudan.

    Malign actors continue to engage in sabotage and terrorism.

    Bullies threaten to use nuclear weapons, and authoritarianism is spreading.

    Some countries are shifting alignment, high global inflation continues to put pressure on working people.

    And institutions that we helped build are being eroded and rules that we helped write are being challenged.

    These factors compound threats and risks in our own region from a changing climate, military buildup without transparency, and disruption of trade – as well as the risks inherent in great power competition.

    I recently released the 2025 Snapshot of Australia in the World, a summary of our foreign policy strategy, priorities and policy achievements.

    What it clearly shows is that even though we face a time of growing uncertainty, Australia is well-placed to protect our security, our stability and our prosperity.

    But that is only if we continue to build our disciplined focus on our region, because it is here where our interests are most at stake; if we invest not only in traditional but also in more diverse relationships; and if we work with partners to uphold international rules that protect us all.

    We have to apply ourselves to these tasks with ambition and calm, consistent and disciplined engagement.

    This is the approach the Albanese Government is taking with the United States.

    President Trump’s America First agenda envisages a very different role for America in the world, and that is what the American people have chosen.

    President Trump campaigned on change and none of us should try to minimise the implications of this change.

    And over the first seven weeks of the Trump Administration we have seen how broad those implications are around the world.

    Mindful of the scale of this change involving our most important strategic partner, there has been extensive engagement across senior levels of the Albanese Government.

    In addition to our relentless Ambassador in Washington, the Prime Minister has had two productive phone calls with the President.

    I had the honour of being the first Australian Foreign Minister ever to be invited to attend a Presidential Inauguration, and I was able to put the case for Australia to the Secretary of State Marco Rubio on his first day in office.

    The Deputy Prime Minister was Secretary Hegseth’s first international counterpart to meet with him following his confirmation.

    The Treasurer has made an early connection with his counterpart, US Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent.

    And our Trade and Tourism Minister has also been engaging with his counterparts.

    In those interactions we make the point that the US enjoys a two-to-one trade surplus with Australia and has since the Truman Presidency.

    We make the point that US exports to Australia face no tariffs.

    And that our trade and investment relationship is important for US industry and jobs. Half of Australia’s exports are inputs into US manufacturing and construction. And of course, we are a top 10 investor in the United States.

    And given the pool of funds under management in Australia’s superannuation sector that can only grow.

    Nevertheless, last week we saw that the second Trump administration has hardened its position in favour of tariffs as a centrepiece of its economic policy.

    And whereas the first Trump administration exempted 36 countries from steel tariffs and 32 countries from aluminium tariffs, this time not one single country has been exempted.

    Not Australia. Not Japan. Not anyone.

    And the degree of a country’s engagement has not changed the outcome.

    Indeed, the administration has been clear that the exemptions granted in its first term were a mistake.

    Our response to the Trump administration’s imposition of tariffs on Australia has been firm and it has been clear.

    As the Prime Minister has said, these measures are “entirely unjustified”.

    And “it is against the spirit of our two nations, enduring friendship and fundamentally at odds with the benefits our economic partnership has delivered over more than 70 years.”

    Steel and aluminium exports to the US represent 0.18 per cent of Australia’s total exports in 2023.

    We will continue to press the case for all Australian exporters, including steel and aluminium.

    We will continue to have advocate for the existing economy-wide access commitments under the Australia-United States Free Trade Agreement. They should be maintained.

    And we will also keep making the case for the many opportunities Australia has to offer.

    After the US announced their position, Peter Dutton said he would “do a deal” and “there’s no question about that”.

    Given not one leader of the 36 countries that got a deal last time got a deal this time, Australians are right to be incredulous about that claim.

    And they,re rightly concerned Peter Dutton would do a deal at any cost.

    Unlike Mr Dutton, we are not going to give away the farm – and we don,t have to.

    We will always put the interests of Australian industries and workers first.

    Remember, these tariffs do not necessarily mean that Americans won,t keep buying Australian products.

    And many nations want our exports. This state understands that possibly more than any part of Australia.

    We have a strong track record of supporting our exporters diversify their export markets, and regardless of what happens with US tariffs, that is a priority we will continue to pursue.

    One of the priorities I have brought to this job has been a focus on Southeast Asia, in part because of where I,m from originally, but in part because of my firm belief that ASEAN and the countries of Southeast Asia are critical to our next generation’s stability and prosperity.

    So just to our north, Indonesia stands as a major and growing power in our region and beyond.

    The world’s third largest democracy, projected to become the world’s fifth largest economy.

    So deepening our economic engagement with Indonesia is of enormous value to Australia, and part of our broader effort to diversify our economy, especially through Southeast Asia.

    Now we have our work cut out. When we came to government, Australian direct investment in Southeast Asia was lower than it was in 2014.

    Over this period, while international investment in the region had grown apace, Australia’s investment in it had gone backwards, both in relative and absolute terms.

    And by 2040, Southeast Asia is predicted to be the world’s fourth-largest economy after the United States, China and India.

    Australia’s trade and investment has simply not kept pace – and we need to turn this around.

    Australia has been central to the north Asian economic growth story, so we must be to the Southeast Asian economic growth story.

    That’s why we appointed Nicholas Moore AO as Australia’s Special Envoy to Southeast Asia and charged him with developing a Southeast Asia Economic Strategy to 2040.

    In the almost 18 months since its launch, we have made tangible progress.

    We have now implemented a number of initiatives responding to its recommendations, including new deal teams to identify and facilitate Australian investment in the region.

    New landing pads in Jakarta and Ho Chi Minh City, in addition to the existing hub in Singapore, to help our tech companies scale up.

    Business and investment missions, including three to Singapore, one of which was our largest ever outbound investment mission by value, representing a combined $2.5 trillion of assets under management.

    Improved visa access for businesspeople from the region and the establishment of the ASEAN-Australia Centre because we have to continue to build Southeast Asia literacy and enhance business and cultural ties.

    It’s no accident that Austrade had their best ever client results in Southeast Asia in 2024, with over $1 billion in commercial outcomes.

    We all need to play our part in diversification.

    Complacency, or business as usual, risks compromising our influence today and our prosperity tomorrow.

    Nobody today could claim they don,t understand the risk of putting too many eggs in one market.

    As you know, China’s growth has been a crucial driver of Australia’s prosperity and the world’s prosperity – and we know this has never been straightforward for business.

    Especially during the last term of government, when China’s doors were closed to many of our exports.

    Since the Albanese Government was elected you have seen a concerted effort to restore dialogue and stabilise the relationship with our largest trading partner.

    We pressed China to lift impediments on more than $20 billion of Australian exports – barley, wine, coal, timber logs, cotton, beef, hay and copper ores, concentrates, and lobsters.

    The final impediments on lobster were lifted in late December, and we have seen in just the first month of the crayfish trade resuming into China, sales have already reached $118 million.

    We know how important that is to Western Australia. In 2023-24, China received 56 per cent of exports from this state. And what we want is grow opportunities for our great exporters – both into China and elsewhere across our region.

    The China relationship will continue to face challenges.

    You see, the term stabilisation has never meant there would be no problems.

    It has always meant we should be able to engage directly with China in order to manage differences and problems that are inevitable – without these problems derailing our ability to talk to each other – as we saw in the past.

    And that is what we will keep doing – and it is what the Australian people expect of us, your government – to engage confidently, calmly and consistently, protecting our sovereignty and advancing our interests.

    We have seen in recent weeks that the same people who had no regard for the consequences for Australian exporters and jobs are at it again – trying to turn China into an election issue, with inflammatory language.

    This country, as you all know, built our prosperity in great part because we are a trading nation.

    A great trading nation has to grapple with a world where trade can be a vulnerability as well as an opportunity.

    And the whole country, all of us, government, business, the workforce – we have to manage these risks together.

    We can’t imagine the challenges away nor can we put other countries, interests ahead of ours.

    What we can do is recognise our challenges in the world are growing.

    That our interests are most at stake in our region.

    And that we must not just invest in our traditional relationships but also in diversified relationships.

    And if we do these things, we can be confident that together as Australians we can meet these challenges, and keep building a better future.

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-Evening Report: PSNA calls on NZ govt to condemn renewed Israel air strikes on Gaza – 230 killed

    Asia Pacific Report

    A national Palestinian advocacy group has called on the Aotearoa New Zealand government to immediately condemn Israel for its resumption today of “genocidal attacks” on the almost 2 million Palestinians trapped in the besieged Gaza enclave.

    Media reports said that more than 230 people had been killed — many of them children — in a wave of predawn attacks by Israel to break the fragile ceasefire that had been holding since mid-January.

    The renewed war on Gaza comes amid a worsening humanitarian crisis that has persisted for 16 days since March 1.

    This followed Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu’s decision to block the entry of all aid and goods, cut water and electricity, and shut down the Strip’s border crossings at the end of the first phase of the ceasefire agreement.

    “Immediate condemnation of Israel’s resumption of attacks on Gaza must come from the New Zealand government”, said co-national chair John Minto of the Palestine Solidarity Network Aotearoa (PSNA) in a statement.

    “Israel has breached the January ceasefire agreement multiple times and is today relaunching its genocidal attacks against the Palestinian people of Gaza.”

    Israeli violations
    He said that in the last few weeks Israel had:

    • refused to negotiate the second stage of the ceasefire agreement with Hamas which would see a permanent ceasefire and complete withdrawal of Israeli troops from Gaza;
    • Issued a complete ban on food, water, fuel and medical supplies entering Gaza — “a war crime of epic proportions”; and
    • Cut off the electricity supply desperately needed to, for example, operate desalination plants for water supplies.

    ‘Cowardly silence’
    “The New Zealand government response has been a cowardly silence when the people of New Zealand have been calling for sanctions against Israel for its genocide,” Minto said.

    “The government is out of touch with New Zealanders but in touch with US/Israel.

    “Foreign Minister Winston Peters seems to be explaining his silence as ‘keeping his nerve’.

    Minto said that for the past 17 months, minister Peters had condemned every act of Palestinian resistance against 77 years of brutal colonisation and apartheid policies.

    “But he has refused to condemn any of the countless war crimes committed by Israel during this time — including the deliberate use of starvation as a weapon of war.

    “Speaking out to condemn Israel now is our opportunity to force it to reconsider and begin negotiations on stage two of the ceasefire agreement Israel is trying to walk away from.

    “Palestinians and New Zealanders deserve no less.”

    A Netanyahu “Wanted” sign at last Saturday’s pro-Palestinian rally in “Palestinian Corner”, Auckland . . . in reference to the International Criminal Court arrest warrants issued last November against the Israeli Prime Minister and former defence minister Yoav Gallant. Image: APR

    ‘Devastating sounds’
    Al Jazeera reporter Maram Humaid said from Gaza: “We woke up to the devastating sounds of multiple explosions as a series of air attacks targeted various areas across the Gaza Strip, from north to south, including Jabalia, Gaza City, Nuseirat, Deir el-Balah and Khan Younis.”

    “The strikes hit homes, residential buildings, schools sheltering displaced people and tents, resulting in a significant number of casualties, including women and children, especially since the attacks occurred during sleeping hours.

    The Palestinian Ministry of Health in Gaza said at least 232 people had been killed in today’s Israeli raids.

    The Palestinian resistance group Hamas called on people of Arab and Islamic nations — and the “free people of the world” — to take to the streets in protest over the devastating attack.

    Hamas urged people across the world to “raise their voice in rejection of the resumption of the Zionist war of extermination against our people in the Gaza Strip”.

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Minns Government seeks energy bill relief for cyclone region

    Source: New South Wales Government 2

    Headline: Minns Government seeks energy bill relief for cyclone region

    Published: 18 March 2025

    Released by: Minister for Energy and Climate Change, Minister for the North Coast, Minister for Small Business


    The Minns Labor Government has written to energy companies asking them to defer electricity bills and waive a fee for NSW households and businesses hit by ex-Tropical Cyclone Alfred, to further ease the pressure on those recovering from the natural disaster.

    Residents and business owners in northern NSW have experienced substantial disruptions to their power supply due to ex-Tropical Cyclone Alfred. It delivered heavy rain and severe winds to large areas of Northern NSW, causing extensive damage to the area’s electricity distribution network.

    A total of 84,000 homes and businesses experienced power outages across various communities from Tweed Heads to Grafton, and west to Armidale. Some lost power multiple times.

    Essential Energy will waive the daily access charge for customers for the period they were without power.

    While energy retailers have not played a role in relation to the power disruptions, Minister for Energy Penny Sharpe has written to 22 companies requesting their cooperation in supporting customers who live in local government areas included in the natural disaster declaration. The Minister has asked them to:

    • waive the daily power supply charge for customers for the period they were not supplied electricity (by passing on the waiver being provided to retailers by Essential Energy)
    • defer any electricity bills that are due to be sent to customers for 14 days
    • defer any disconnections or repayment requirements for 14 days for affected customers in debt or with any amount owing on their account
    • provide additional information about payment plan options and NSW Government financial support if customers find they are unable to pay their bill as a result of the cyclone impacts.

    The NSW Government along with the Australian Government is working together to provide support to the affected area. A personal hardship grant with payments of $180 for individuals and up to $900 per family is available through Service NSW for essential costs such as food, clothing, medicine and emergency accommodation. To be eligible, individuals must have been subject to an evacuation order or have experienced a power outage of more than 48 hours.

    Customers whose ability to repay their energy bills has been impacted by Ex-Tropical Cyclone Alfred can also apply for NSW Government Energy Accounts Payment Assistance (EAPA) support to help pay their energy bills. EAPA helps people experiencing difficulty paying their electricity and/or gas bill due to a short-term financial hardship, crisis or emergency to stay connected to essential services. EAPA can only be applied to current, unpaid energy bills.

    Minister for Energy, Penny Sharpe said:

    “It is important we provide as much support as possible to households and business owners who are recovering from ex-Tropical Cyclone Alfred.

    “I have written to energy retailers asking them to join Essential Energy in providing relief to customers in the natural disaster zone, and thank them in advance for any assistance they can offer.”

    Minister for Recovery, Small Business and the North Coast, Janelle Saffin said:

    “Every bit of support counts for families, households and businesses doing it tough in the wake of this natural disaster.

    “Thank you for your consideration of this request during this difficult time for the residents and businesses of the Northern Rivers and North Coast.”

    Further information:

    • Essential Energy is one of three distribution network operators in NSW. Essential Energy, Ausgrid and Endeavour Energy are responsible for the distribution lines in a specified region:
      • Essential Energy – Riverina, South Eastern region, Northern NSW and Central Tablelands
      • Ausgrid – Sydney’s north, Central Coast and Newcastle
      • Endeavour Energy – Blue Mountains, Western Sydney, Illawarra and South Coast
    • Energy retailers such as Origin Energy, AGL, Red Energy and EnergyAustralia buy electricity from the market pool and contract with generators to manage prices.
      • Retailers then sell electricity to households and businesses. Most customers only ever interact with their retailer, which sends them their quarterly bill.
      • There are 22 energy retailers with customers in the region affected by the natural disaster from 3 March 2025.
    • To assist customer recovery from the impacts of ex-cyclone Alfred and the extended periods of time without power, Essential Energy is offering financial and non-financial support. For more information visit the Essential Energy website.

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Padilla, Schiff Push VA to Bolster Emergency Services for Veterans Affected by LA Fires

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Alex Padilla (D-Calif.)

    Padilla, Schiff Push VA to Bolster Emergency Services for Veterans Affected by LA Fires

    Senators: “While the fires have been extinguished, veterans will have ongoing needs for months if not years ahead”
    WASHINGTON, D.C. — Today, U.S. Senators Alex Padilla and Adam Schiff (both D-Calif.) urged Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Secretary Doug Collins to provide emergency health care and housing for veterans affected by the Los Angeles fires. Many veterans in these areas are at risk of losing access to vital health care services, including medications and power for medical equipment.
    Fueled by wind gusts of up to 100 miles per hour, the Los Angeles County fires burned more than 40,000 acres and forced tens of thousands of residents to evacuate, including many veterans whose health and well-being depend on local resources and Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) services.
    “Los Angeles County is home to the most veterans in the nation, and many of them will struggle to navigate the fires’ aftermath,” wrote the Senators. “As a Navy veteran yourself, you know that veterans often face complex challenges that make the recovery from natural disasters even more complicated, including access to health care, housing, and mental health services.”
    “Our offices stand ready to assist in any way possible to facilitate these efforts and ensure that our veterans receive the care and support they have earned. We would welcome the opportunity to help the VA coordinate its assistance to these needs in close partnership with state and local authorities and organizations to maximize the impact of recovery efforts for veterans,” continued the Senators.
    Padilla and Schiff urged the VA to prioritize the following actions to support veterans recovering from the Los Angeles fires:
    Expedite access to emergency care and services to make sure veterans affected by the fires can quickly access medical care, including mental health services, through VA facilities and community providers.
    Provide housing assistance, collaborating with state and local agencies to quickly identify and support affected veterans participating in the HUD-VASH, Supportive Services for Veteran Families, and other Homeless Program Office programs, as well as to provide additional housing resources and emergency financial support for displaced veterans and their families.
    Offer outreach and benefits by ensuring that impacted veterans are aware of available resources and relief options and have easy access to VA staff who can assist them in navigating the recovery process.
    Offer additional mental health resources, including counseling and crisis support, to help veterans cope with the emotional and psychological toll of the fires and their disastrous impacts.
    Develop long-term recovery plans, coordinating with local, state, and federal agencies to help veterans whose homes and livelihoods were severely impacted recover and rebuild.
    Senators Padilla and Schiff have fought relentlessly to secure and protect Southern Californians’ access to desperately needed disaster relief aid. In the immediate aftermath of the Los Angeles fires, Padilla and Schiff led 47 bipartisan members of the California Congressional delegation in successfully urging President Biden to grant Governor Gavin Newsom’s request for a major disaster declaration to expedite timely relief to Los Angeles County residents impacted by these disasters. Padilla recently blasted the Republican’s spending bill, emphasizing that it did not include the disaster relief funding California needs.
    Last month, Padilla, Schiff, and Representatives Ken Calvert (R-Calif.-41) and Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.-18) led the entire bipartisan California Congressional delegation in urging Senior Congressional leadership to provide additional disaster relief funding and resources to help Los Angeles County communities rebuild. Padilla, Schiff, Calvert, and Lofgren also successfully pushed FEMA to extend the application deadline for federal disaster assistance for victims of the Los Angeles fires. Padilla previously delivered remarks on the Senate floor urging his Republican colleagues and President Trump to provide essential disaster recovery aid to California without conditioning it on the passage of partisan legislation.
    Full text of the letter is available here and below:
    Dear Secretary Collins,
    We write today regarding the continuing effects of the Los Angeles wildfires on our veterans and their families. As you are aware, the wildfires caused widespread destruction, forcing tens of thousands of individuals from their homes, including a significant number of veterans who rely on local resources and Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) services for their health and well-being. We appreciate the rapid assistance the VA provided to this community in the immediate response to the wildfires. Unfortunately, while the fires have been extinguished, veterans will have ongoing needs for months if not years ahead.
    Los Angeles County is home to the most veterans in the nation, and many of them will struggle to navigate the fires’ aftermath. As a Navy veteran yourself, you know that veterans often face complex challenges that make the recovery from natural disasters even more complicated, including access to health care, housing, and mental health services. We write to urge the VA to prioritize the following actions as it continues to support veterans during this time of need:
    1. Expedited Access to Emergency Care and Services: Ensuring veterans affected by the fires can quickly access medical care, including mental health services, through VA facilities and community providers. We ask that the VA consider re-deploying a mobile Vet Center to the region to provide counseling, crisis intervention, and other necessary services for veterans impacted by this disaster if needed. In addition, for veterans who lost access to their means of transportation, we ask the VA to explore collaborating with Disabled American Veterans (DAV) to see if DAV vans could again be utilized to help provide emergency transportation to affected veterans and their families.
    2. Housing Assistance: Collaborating with state and local agencies to quickly identify and support affected HUD-VASH, Supportive Services for Veteran Families, and other Homeless Program Office programs’ participants and to provide additional housing resources and emergency financial support for displaced veterans and their families. And please ensure that veterans who were already or are newly unhoused have easy access to outreach services to begin the process of becoming rehoused.
    3. Outreach and Benefits: Ensuring that veterans in the affected areas are aware of available resources and have easy access to VA staff who can assist them in navigating the recovery process. We also urge the Veterans Benefits Administration (VBA) to continue to identify relief options for veterans affected by the fires. This could include the expedited processing of claims, suspending deadlines for response, or extending flexibility for disability medical examinations and other appointments.
    4. Mental Health Support: Offering additional mental health resources, including counseling and crisis support, to help veterans cope with the emotional and psychological toll of the disaster.
    5. Long-Term Recovery Plans: Coordinating with local, state, and federal agencies to provide long-term recovery assistance and rebuilding efforts, particularly for veterans whose homes and livelihoods were severely impacted.
    Our offices stand ready to assist in any way possible to facilitate these efforts and ensure that our veterans receive the care and support they have earned. We would welcome the opportunity to help the VA coordinate its assistance to these needs in close partnership with state and local authorities and organizations to maximize the impact of recovery efforts for veterans.
    We commend the VA for its timely, ongoing, and continued support to our veterans and their families following the devasting fires and look forward to working with you to ensure that our veterans have the resources they need to recover and rebuild their lives.
    Sincerely,

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Live life in the past lane

    Source: Government of Western Australia

    Wind back the clock and get a glimpse into the past during the City of Wanneroo’s Australian Heritage Festival celebrations this autumn.

    Running from 18 April to 18 May and coordinated by the National Trust, the Australian Heritage Festival is the country’s largest community-driven celebration of heritage.

    This year’s theme is Unearthed – revealing the past, bringing to light lesser-known histories and stories, and unearthing knowledge to empower younger generations as custodians of culture and tradition.

    To celebrate this theme, the City is running a series of free, family-friendly community events at the Cockman and Buckingham heritage houses, Wanneroo Regional Museum and a variety of other locations across the City.  

    Our free Heritage Festival events include:

    • The Antipodean Manifesto exhibition at Wanneroo Regional Gallery, Wednesdays to Saturdays, 18 April to 3 May.
    • A bees and beeswax wraps workshop at Buckingham House on 30 April.
    • Mischief and mysteries school holiday sessions at Wanneroo Museum, running various days between 19 and 26 April.
    • Sunday afternoons at Cockman House from 20 April to 11 May.
    • Embroidery workshops at various City libraries on 30 April, 7 and 14 May.
    • Friday Flicks: 40-year showcase at the Wanneroo Theatrette on 2, 9 and 16 May.
    • A Wanneroo in wartime bus tour, departing from Wanneroo Regional Museum, on 6 May.

    Find out more about these programs and events at wanneroo.wa.gov.au/heritagefestival.

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI China: Xi praises distinctive Dong culture in ethnic village

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    GUIYANG, March 18 — Xi Jinping, general secretary of the Communist Party of China Central Committee, visited a Dong ethnic village in southwest China’s Guizhou Province on Monday afternoon, praising the distinctive culture of the ethnic group as “deeply traditional and remarkably stylish.”

    Xi watched a performance of the grand song of the Dong ethnic group, a form of a folk chorus inscribed on the UNESCO Intangible Cultural Heritage list, in the Zhaoxing Dong Village in Liping County.

    He also explored the features of the village, visited the Dong culture exhibition center, and inspected a local base of special industry featuring weaving, dyeing and embroidery.

    “Stilt houses, ancient villages, intangible cultural heritage instruments, the grand song of the Dong people, and batik craftsmanship all embody the unique charm of this ethnic culture — both deeply traditional and remarkably stylish,” Xi said.

    He expressed the hope that with the support of the Party and the government, the villagers will live better lives, further advance rural revitalization, and contribute to the progress of Chinese modernization.

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-Evening Report: The next round in the US trade war has the potential to be more damaging for Australia

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Felicity Deane, Professor of Trade Law, Taxation and Climate Change, Queensland University of Technology

    Slladkaya/Shutterstock

    On April 2 the United States is set to implement a new wave of tariffs under its Fair and Reciprocal Trade Plan. Details of the plan that will impact all US trading partners are not yet known, but the US administration has suggested these tariffs will target any rules it considers “unfair”.

    This means the April 2 tariffs may take aim at a range of Australian domestic policies, such as biosecurity rules that govern food imports, and the government’s Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS).

    The size of the hit is uncertain. One report indicates a relatively modest tariff between 2% and 8% is being considered, below the 25% rate imposed on steel and aluminium on March 12. But it will apply to a much larger set of exports.




    Read more:
    With Australian steel and aluminium set to incur US tariffs, global uncertainty will be our next challenge


    Australia and the US have been allies for over a century. The two nations celebrated a “century of mateship” in 2018. More formally, the two countries have a current free trade agreement, Australia-United States Free Trade Agreement (AUSFTA).

    The agreement was negotiated in good faith, and entered into force on January 1, 2005. It called for the elimination of tariffs between the two nations over time, and until now both parties have upheld their respective bargains. The so-called “reciprocal” tariff plan would breach that agreement.

    What sectors are likely to be targeted?

    The Trump reference to non-tariff barriers raises two main concerns for Australian products: meat and pharmaceuticals.

    These exports to the US are worth about A$3.3 billion and $1.6 billion a year respectively. That’s about five times the total value of our steel and aluminium exports to the US.

    In Australia, domestic beef products are subject to strict traceability rules. Similarly, imported beef has rigid biosecurity requirements as it is classified as a high-risk food.

    This is because of the potential risk of mad cow disease (Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy). This disease was detected in the US in 2002 and triggered an Australian ban on US beef products.

    The ban was partially lifted in 2018, but some restrictions remain, which the US says are a barrier to trade. This was also raised by the Biden administration in a 2024 report on trade barriers.

    The US cannot force Australia to change its laws on the basis of tariffs – but they can make products coming from Australian suppliers more expensive and therefore restrict market access to the US, which many Australian producers rely on.

    A tariff on Australian-sourced beef products would also push up prices for American consumers. Trade Minister Don Farrell has warned the price of a McDonald’s burger may increase.

    If tariffs are placed on Australian beef, the government has warned that McDonalds burgers in the US will become more expensive.
    Shutterstock

    Medicines are also in the line of fire

    Turning to pharmaceuticals, the Australian PBS has been a sticking point between US and Australian trade negotiators for the past 20 years.  

    The PBS, which has been in place since 1948, ensures Australians have affordable access to essential medicines. It formed part of discussions during the free-trade negotiations and has been raised as a potential barrier to trade.

    The US argues innovation and unfettered market access for American drug companies should be prioritised over Australia’s reference pricing arrangements. Reference pricing means medicines with similar outcomes should have similar pricing.

    The reason the US has a problem with this scheme is because some of their companies are not able to charge higher prices for medicines.

    Although these are the categories of most concern, there is no assurance the “Fair and Reciprocal Plan” will be limited to beef and pharmaceuticals.

    For instance, there are no barriers imposed on the import of wine into Australia. But there has been some concern tariffs could be introduced regardless.

    Wine is often the target of trade wars and President Donald Trump has threatened the European Union with a 200% tariff on all wine and spirits entering the US. As Australian wine makers have only recently recovered from Chinese and Canadian tariffs, any US tariffs would deal a harsh blow to the industry.

    An old clip of the former Republican President Ronald Reagan went viral this week, highlighting his quite different view:

    Is there any avenue for appeal?

    There is one thing that is clear about these tariffs. Their imposition will be in violation of both the WTO rules and the free-trade agreement.

    Both have provisions to settle disputes and Australia does have options for filing complaints. However, the rule of law and existing norms of the international order do not appear to be persuasive to the Trump administration.

    Despite this, it is important to note the US cannot force Australia to change its longstanding laws that protect consumers and ensure accessibility to medicines. This remains the choice of the Australian government.

    If the tariffs are introduced in the range of 2% to 8%, there may not be a significant direct economic impact. But they will have other consequences. Trade negotiations, and international agreements, are largely based on goodwill. These acts of the US will erode much of what has been built up over the past century.

    The downturn we are seeing in financial markets has so far been dismissed by the Trump administration as necessary. But if the correction turns into a crash, it may give President Trump pause. Given his lack of interest in negotiating, this may be the only thing that could change his mind.

    Felicity Deane does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. The next round in the US trade war has the potential to be more damaging for Australia – https://theconversation.com/the-next-round-in-the-us-trade-war-has-the-potential-to-be-more-damaging-for-australia-252377

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Builder appointed for Moree Hospital Redevelopment

    Source: New South Wales Government 2

    Headline: Builder appointed for Moree Hospital Redevelopment

    Published: 18 March 2025

    Released by: Minister for Regional Health


    The Moree Hospital Redevelopment is a step closer, with the main works contractor appointed and the next stage of work on track to begin in the coming months.

    The NSW Government is investing $105 million in the hospital redevelopment to deliver new health facilities and upgraded health services for Moree and the surrounding communities to ensure their health needs continue to be met well into the future. 

    Hutchinson Builders has been awarded the contract following a competitive tender process. 

    The $105 million Moree Hospital Redevelopment will include construction of a new Acute Services Building on the existing hospital campus, which will house:

    • An emergency department
    • Operating theatres
    • Medical imaging
    • A birthing and inpatient unit
    • Pathology
    • A new main entry for the new hospital building.

    The appointment of a builder follows the recent statutory planning approval for the project. Construction is expected to begin in the coming months.  

    The Moree Hospital will continue to operate during construction as a District Hospital, providing care for the Moree and surrounding communities, and will remain networked to Tamworth Hospital for access to specialist services. 

    Extensive consultation with staff and the community has been carried out throughout planning for the redevelopment to ensure the new hospital building creates a welcoming environment that reflects the heritage and culture of the region. 

    A Language Reference Group is working to inform the inclusion of Aboriginal language and storytelling into signage and wayfinding into the redevelopment, while planning is underway for Arts projects which will be included in the new acute services building.  

    For more information about the Moree Hospital redevelopment visit: https://hneinfra.health.nsw.gov.au/projects/moree 

    Quotes attributable to Minister for Regional Health Ryan Park:  

    “We’ve reached a significant milestone in the delivery of the redevelopment which will deliver enhanced healthcare facilities for Moree and surrounding communities. 

    “The Moree Hospital Redevelopment will provide staff, patients, families and carers with a modern facility to support the health needs of the community now and into the future.

    “All hospital services will continue to operate during construction, which follows significant planning and design work in collaboration with staff, stakeholders and the community.” 

    Quotes attributable to Government Spokesperson for Northern Tablelands, Peter Primrose: 

    “The $105 million Moree Hospital Redevelopment is estimated to support approximately 150 direct jobs, with the potential to support hundreds of indirect jobs over the life of the project. 

    “This will provide a huge boost to the local economy, and I look forward to seeing work progress in the coming months.”

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-Evening Report: After a century of Monday to Friday, could the 4-day week finally be coming to Australia?

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By John L. Hopkins, Associate Professor of Management, Swinburne University of Technology

    The reality of shorter working hours could be one step closer for many Australians, pending the outcome of the federal election.

    The Greens, who could control crucial cross bench votes in a hung parliament, have announced plans for a four-day working week, with no loss of pay. They say the policy would alleviate stress and burn out, and increase women’s participation in the workforce.

    Earning the same money for fewer hours would appeal to most workers. But is it too good to be true? Could it really be rolled out cost free to all workplaces, especially to “client facing” companies and service providers?

    Or does research suggest the Greens could be onto something?

    The Greens’ plan

    The Greens’ policy would involve a new National Institute for the Four Day Work Week and a test case through the Fair Work Commission.

    A series of national trials would be set up in a number of different industries, whereby workers would work 80% of their normal hours, while maintaining 100% of their pay.

    According to Greens Senator Barbara Pocock, it’s a win-win for everyone:

    It can increase productivity, reduce absenteeism, improve recruitment and retention and give employees more time to manage their home life. This change will allow workers to create a working week that works for them.

    The 100:80:100 model

    The four-day work week being proposed in this instance is commonly regarded as the 100:80:100 model.

    It delivers 100% of the pay, for 80% of the hours, in return for maintaining 100% of productivity.

    This is unlike other forms of shorter working weeks, which compress five days’ worth of work into four longer days. This obviously disadvantages some employees.

    Recent research conducted by Swinburne University of Technology involved interviews with ten Australian firms that have already adopted the 100:80:100 model.

    They were a mixture of small and medium sized private sector businesses, including management consulting firms, a shipping and logistics company, and recruitment and marketing agencies.

    The research underlined the potential for a range of positive outcomes for both employers and employees.

    Workers reported having better work-life balance, more time to complete “life administration” tasks, and more time to invest in hobbies, exercise, wellness and self-care. Bosses cited productivity gains, reduced sick days, and significant improvements in recruitment and retention rates.

    However, the 100:80:100 model is viewed with scepticism in some quarters. There is still doubt that productivity and output would be maintained, or in some cases improved, when workers are working one day fewer per week.

    Also, there could be costs associated with the implementation of this work model for front-line roles, such as retail, schools, hospitals and nursing homes. Additional workers may need to be hired, at extra expense, to cover the hours dropped by the existing workforce.

    100 years of working 5 days a week

    The year 2026 will mark the 100th anniversary of the five-day work week.

    It was car maker Henry Ford who reduced the working week in the United States from six days to five. Other sectors and countries followed suit. This was at a time when the average life expectancy of Australian workers was just 55 and households typically only had one bread-winner.

    Despite the time saved by the many technological breakthroughs in the past 100 years – from the photocopier, desktop computer and fax machine, to the internet, mobile phones and AI – the average Australian is now working longer hours in paid and unpaid labour than ever before.

    The Greens point out Australian society is changing. More women and carers are either in the workforce or would be encouraged into the workforce by more flexible arrangements:

    yet we are constrained by archaic labour laws that see the fruits of our efforts swallowed up in profits for bosses and shareholders.

    The role of generative AI technologies in the workplace may also deliver benefits to workers. Separate Swinburne research has revealed an increasing expectation among workers that they will receive a share in the time saved by future technologies in the form of improved work-life balance and wellbeing gains.

    Time to enter the 21st century

    Earlier this year, 200 UK companies signed up to the 100:80:100 model, as part of a campaign to “reinvent Britain’s working week”. Large scale trials are also underway in Canada and several European countries.

    The global interest in a shorter working week is not surprising, and has likely been fuelled by the COVID pandemic, which has caused workers and employers to re-imagine their working lives.

    If the Greens are in a position to leverage any balance of power after the coming election, it could be Australia’s turn to recognise the conventional five-day working week is no longer fit for purpose.

    John L. Hopkins does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. After a century of Monday to Friday, could the 4-day week finally be coming to Australia? – https://theconversation.com/after-a-century-of-monday-to-friday-could-the-4-day-week-finally-be-coming-to-australia-252379

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Minister Rishworth doorstop interview at the Derwent Valley Community House in New Norfolk, Tasmania

    Source: Ministers for Social Services

    E&OE TRANSCRIPT

    Topics: Investment in Australia’s neighbourhood houses and community centres; ABC Four Corners child care investigation.

    AMANDA RISHWORTH, MINISTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES: I’m so pleased to be here at Derwent Valley Community House to make a really important announcement that the Commonwealth Government will partner with neighbourhood houses and community centres across Australia to deliver funding for their priorities. This announcement will be close to a $1 million and deliver small grants to up to 50 projects delivered by neighbourhood houses and community centres through the Australian Neighbourhood Houses and Centres Association. This is a really good partnership. We have been investing through our Strong and Resilient Communities grants in neighbourhood houses directly. But this is the first time that we’ll partner with the national association to deliver small grants across the country. Of course, here in Tasmania, there is a very strong network of neighbourhood houses and community centres, and they’ve demonstrated that they do a lot with a small amount of money. So, I’m really pleased to be announcing this partnership today, and happy to take any questions.

    JOURNALIST: So, what’s the value of these individual grants?

    AMANDA RISHWORTH: Individual grants will be up to $15,000 to do a variety of things under the SARC (Strong and Resilient Communities) grant guidelines. It’s really about building community connections, particularly for those people that may be isolated, disengaged, disconnected. There’s often a focus on youth or newly arrived migrants. But ultimately, the types of ideas will come from the centres themselves, and they’ll be able to put an application into the association to get that funding.

    JOURNALIST: You spoke about a lack of volunteers before over the past few years. Can you go into a little bit of that?

    AMANDA RISHWORTH: COVID, in particular, disrupted volunteering across the country. We have been working hard with Volunteering Australia to build that back up. So we have put in place a National Strategy for Volunteering, along with an action plan. I’ve also been working with the peak associations in all states and territories to make sure that we’re providing funding for them to look at groups that may have been excluded from volunteering in the past. And we’re actually also running a new national campaign encouraging young people to look at volunteering. It’s called Hanging Out to Help Out. So these are really important elements to encourage volunteering. But I would say that we are seeing some green shoots of this investment. We are seeing, anecdotally, volunteers coming back and wanting to play a role, and speaking with the volunteers at this neighbourhood centre, hearing that they want to give back to the community is really heartening. And we’ve also heard, of course, the connections that are made through volunteering and being part of a community.

    JOURNALIST: Of those 50 community houses that you mentioned before. Are they predetermined or are applications open?

    AMANDA RISHWORTH: We are providing the funding to the Australian Neighbourhood Houses and Centres Association to take applications and deliver that money. They are best placed and have the experience to do this. They have run a similar program with philanthropic money so they know how to do this. So we’re partnering with the national association to administer those ones.

    JOURNALIST: And is there a state by state allocation or is it first in best dressed?

    KEIR PATERSON, CEO OF NEIGHBOURHOOD HOUSES VICTORIA: We will assess all the applications, and they will be granted on the merit of the application. But we also look at the geographical spread to make sure it’s equitable state by state.

    JOURNALIST: Do you know how many are based in Tasmania compared to other states?

    MICHELLE EWINGTON, PRESIDENT OF NEIGHBOURHOOD HOUSES TASMANIA: So here in Tasmania, we have 35 neighbourhood houses that are funded through a variety of means. We’re very lucky to have state government funding and a commitment to such valuable and vital services.

    JOURNALIST: Is there a part of Tasmania that really takes up a lot of those 35 services, or how are they spread out?

    MICHELLE EWINGTON: They are dispersed right around the state. Each of them have their own diverse communities that they work with. They listen to the needs of communities. They fill the gaps for vital services that are required across the state, and each of those will have a great interest in applying for specific project funding as a result of this grant.

    JOURNALIST: You really rely on this funding. This 15K – is it enough?

    MICHELLE EWINGTON: Funding is essential to keep our services alive. We have such loyal staff in these organisations that stretch themselves immensely to actually deliver on the much-needed services for each community. So whilst these grants are going to be very useful and of interest, the continued funding for such important services, having been here today listening to the stories of this great house itself, the experiences of the volunteers here, the more funding that can be provided to houses right across the country, but particularly here in Tasmania, it’s essential.

    JOURNALIST: What types of programs are being offered?

    MICHELLE EWINGTON: Across the state there’s a diverse range of programs, from supporting people with learning to drive and mentor programs to offering social inclusion activities. Here we have a program called Happy Hookers Crochet Club. We offer cooking classes across the state. We bring services in so that they can meet the community where the community is. Community connectors is an important role that actually allows those that are vulnerable, those who may not have the skills, those who might not have the confidence, to approach the relevant services and get the referrals they need.

    JOURNALIST: So for people coming through the door, what are some of the challenges that they’re facing?

    MICHELLE EWINGTON: The challenges that communities face again are complex. The cost of living – we see that every day. Things like our food relief programs, the increased need for those. When we think about isolation and loneliness and the impact on communities, again, another important need addressed by our houses. There are a number of other skill building programs which might not be accessible to people through other means, and so neighbourhood houses fill a vital space in our communities and in amongst government services.

    JOURNALIST: Have you seen a change in the community needs post COVID?

    MICHELLE EWINGTON: I think the change is pretty evident in in terms of the common themes that have come through – cost of living, impacts on mental health, loneliness, concerns about health access, housing. All of the things that we know are big ticket items. At a grassroots level, the neighborhood houses are the places where we hear this, where we learn this, and where we support this.

    JOURNALIST: There are calls for an urgent inquiry into the childcare sector, following a Four Corners expose into abuse, sexual misconduct and neglect. Would you support an inquiry, and in what form?

    AMANDA RISHWORTH: First, I would say that our Government has taken the safety and quality of early learning and care incredibly seriously. In fact, it was Labor that introduced the National Quality Framework, which has done really important work in ensuring that we’re lifting the quality and safety of our early learning sector. But in addition, Minister Clare and Minister Aly commissioned an important report around child safety requirements under the National Quality Framework, and all Education Ministers have agreed to implement those recommendations. So the work really is working across the board with all states and territories to implement these recommendations. I would say that the majority of early childhood education settings and the workers that work in there do the right thing. For those that are not doing the right thing, there needs to be swift action.

    JOURNALIST: And do you think there is swift action at the moment?

    AMANDA RISHWORTH: Well as I said, predominantly the regulatory enforcement does come down to states and territories. However, as I said, Minister Clare and Minister Aly have worked and commissioned a review into child safety. There are now recommendations that all Education Ministers have agreed to. It’s important that those recommendations are implemented.

    JOURNALIST: The sector’s propped up by $14 billion in Federal funding, and there have been increased incidents and breaches in every state. What are you doing to prevent money for educators’ pay rises just going to the profits of centres?

    AMANDA RISHWORTH: Well, let’s be really clear if, if educators and centres sign up for the pay increases, they have to deliver those through pay increases. The program that involves funding educators’ wages must be given to educators. That’s first and foremost. Secondly, we are driving improvement in this sector. It was neglected under the previous Government, who, in fact, opposed the introduction of the National Quality Framework. So it is important that we continue to work with our state and territory colleagues who are responsible for implementing it, but I want to see, importantly, action taken where we see quality improving and safety being lifted.

    JOURNALIST: Given the systemic failures and serious breaches in childcare uncovered by Four Corners, does the Federal Government need to take over regulation to ensure children’s safety?

    AMANDA RISHWORTH: Well, we think that there is an important role to be played by both state and territory governments and the Commonwealth. It is a joint responsibility around the National Quality Framework. We have been working hard, as I said, through the Education Ministers, to do a review through the National Quality Framework to ensure that child safety is reviewed, and it’s a responsibility for states and territories, along with the Commonwealth, to deliver this.

    JOURNALIST: I guess, circling back to that first point, on calls for inquiry. Should there be one? Have you seen the reports from Monday on Four Corners?

    AMANDA RISHWORTH: Of course, child safety has to be at the forefront at all times. And as I said, this has been something that Minister Aly and Minister Clare have had as a real focus. That’s why they commissioned the review. That’s why they’ve taken the recommendations to the Education Ministers, and that’s why they are focused on implementation. We need to ensure that the implementation of these recommendations are made. That’s critically important, and we’ll keep working with states and territories to ensure that happens.

    JOURNALIST: But no fresh inquiry?

    AMANDA RISHWORTH: There was a review done in 2003 after a decade of neglect by the previous Government. There are recommendations made. It is now down to implementing them.

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Miramar incident: Injured man dies in hospital

    Source: New Zealand Police (National News)

    Attribute to Detective Inspector Nick Pritchard:

    A man who was found critically injured on a roadside in Miramar, Wellington has died in hospital this morning, with Police opening an unexplained death investigation.

    The man was found critically injured on a footpath about 2.20am on Monday, at the intersection of Camperdown Road and Totora Road. It was the second serious incident, following the burglary of a Darlington Road address at 2am, where two adults found a stranger in their home.

    After being confronted and fighting with one of the occupants the intruder fled. It was when Police were carrying out area enquiries that officers came across the injured and unconscious man, a short distance from his vehicle.

    Parallel investigations are under way into both incidents and Police are still working to determine if there is any link between the two.

    Sightings of the victim

    We would like to hear from anybody who walked or drove in the area near Camperdown Road and Totora Road between 12.30am and 2.30am on Monday. You may not think you have anything to contribute, but we would like to know what you may have seen, or view any dashcam footage.

    Public appeal

    We ask that residents in Darlington Road, Totara Road and Camperdown Road, particularly the block north of Camperdown Road, to check their properties for any missing clothing from clotheslines or missing footwear or other items. We also want to hear from anyone who locates any discarded items of property on their sections.

    Investigators also want to hear of any sightings of any suspicious persons in this area between 12.30am and 2.30am on Monday, or from anyone with CCTV footage. We are particularly interested in any sightings of a man wearing a white cap, shorts and gumboots.

    Police would also like to hear of any suspicious activity or people prowling in the area over the last couple of weeks, including any previously unreported thefts from properties or vehicles since early March.

    Enquiries ongoing

    Police are still completing scene examinations and will be visiting properties to ask residents if they saw anything of relevance to the investigation and whether they have CCTV footage.

    At this stage it has not been established if there is a connection between the intruder and the deceased, but that is a focus of the investigation.

    While we are still piecing the events of Monday morning together, Police can confirm the intruder was unknown to the occupants of the property that he broke into. They do not know him, and do not know why he was in their house.

    We know these events will cause concern in the community and we are working hard to answer the many questions around Monday morning’s incidents. Police are carrying out reassurance patrols in the Miramar area and this will continue over the coming days.

    If you can help

    If you have any information that could help our enquiries, please update us online now or call 105.

    Please use the reference number 250317/6324, or reference Operation Celtic.

    Information can also be provided anonymously via Crime Stoppers on 0800 555 111. 

    ENDS

    Issued by the Police Media Centre
     

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: ATO releases new small business benchmarks for 100 industries

    Source: Australian Department of Revenue

    The Australian Taxation Office (ATO) has released a new set of updated financial benchmarks to help small business owners take the pulse of their business.

    Updated annually, the ATO’s benchmarks act as a health check, allowing small business owners to compare their performance including average expenses against other businesses in the same industry.

    Quotes attributable to ATO Assistant Commissioner Tony Goding:

    ‘The benchmarks are a valuable tool for small businesses wanting to stay in good financial health.’

    ‘Think of our benchmarks like a routine test you take with your GP each year. These can help small businesses diagnose their strengths or spot the early warning signs.’

    ‘Whether you’re running a pizza shop, pet store or a plumbing business, the benchmarks can help you see how your business stacks up.’

    ‘If your numbers are outside of the benchmark range compared to others in your industry it may be time for a closer look at your business plan.’

    ‘Businesses that remain within industry benchmarks are generally less likely to attract the ATO’s attention.’

    ‘While we never use the benchmarks in isolation, small businesses who fall outside the ATO’s benchmarks are more likely to trigger a closer examination from us to identify if they are making mistakes or deliberately doing the wrong thing.’

    The ATO takes non-compliance with tax seriously. Small businesses avoiding their tax obligations are participating in the shadow economy which puts pressure on Australians who are doing the right thing.

    Deliberate shadow economy behaviours contribute nearly 60% of the gross small business income tax gap or around $11.2 billion per annum in missing tax. Approximately $8.9 billion of this is associated with under reporting of income and over claiming of deductions.

    ‘The benchmarks are just one of the tools we use to tackle the shadow economy, along with community tip-offs and data matching.’

    ‘It’s all about levelling the playing field for honest businesses who are being undercut by their dishonest competitors that aren’t paying the tax they’re supposed to,’ Mr Goding added.

    The benchmarks cover 100 industries and over 2 million small businesses around the country. The industries include:

    • Accommodation and food
    • Building and construction trade services
    • Education, training, recreation and support services
    • Health care and personal services
    • Manufacturing
    • Other services
    • Professional, scientific and technical services
    • Retail trade
    • Transport, postal and warehousing.

    Small business owners who need help understanding how to improve their business performance can consult a business adviser or registered tax professional. The ATO’s online learning platform Essentials to strengthen your small businessExternal Link can support small business owners to prepare for these conversations, as well as further understand their tax and super obligations.

    The benchmarks are accessible on the ATO website and via the ATO app business performance check tool. The key benchmark ratios can also be downloaded from data.gov.au.

    Example

    The below example shows a small business using the ATO benchmarks to compare its performance to similar businesses in the same industry.

    Anna’s pizza shop

    Anna operates a pizza shop as a sole trader. Anna wants to know how her business compares to her competitors and how she can improve her business.

    Anna searches online for ‘pizza shop benchmarks’ and finds the ATO small business benchmarks. She follows the instructions to download the ATO app. Then, she goes to the business performance check tool.

    Anna enters her details into the business performance check tool. She learns the key ratio of cost of sales to turnover for her shop is 44%.

    While this is within the range for businesses in her industry with a turnover of $550,300, Anna sees that the range for cost of sales starts at 37%. She realises some of her competitors have lower cost of sales.

    Anna looked at other suppliers in the market and got a better deal to reduce her business’s expenses and improve profits.

    Notes to journalists

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Vacancy fee return for foreign owners

    Source: Australian Department of Revenue

    What is a vacancy fee return

    A vacancy fee return is an online form that you lodge using Online services for foreign investors once a year while you own the residential property.

    The information required includes how many days in a vacancy year your property was occupied, that is:

    • occupied by the owner living in the property
    • rented by a tenant
    • made genuinely available for rent.

    You or your representative must lodge the vacancy fee return within 30 days from the end of each vacancy year using Online services for foreign investors.

    How a vacancy fee applies to you

    A vacancy fee is a fee that you pay when your residential property is vacant for 183 days (6 months) or more in one vacancy year. By living in the dwelling or making it available for rent, you may not need to pay the fee.

    Note: Established dwellings purchased as a principal place of residence cannot be rented or leased. The property needs to be genuinely occupied by foreign owners or their family members.

    You may need to pay a vacancy fee if your residential dwelling is not:

    • residentially occupied
    • genuinely available on the rental market
    • rented out for 183 or more days (6 months) in a 12-month period.

    A vacancy fee may also apply if the vacancy fee return is not lodged by the due date.

    More information on residential land and the vacancy fee are available at the Foreign InvestmentExternal Link website.

    When do you pay the vacancy fee

    When you lodge your vacancy fee return, the confirmation page will tell you if you are liable to pay a vacancy fee and the amount you need to pay. You can pay the fee when lodging the return or within 30 days of lodging the vacancy fee return.

    The vacancy fee is based on the fee amount you paid when you submitted the foreign investment application.

    After you’ve lodged we will email you a notice of liability of the vacancy fee payable that includes the following:

    • information on the reason we are charging you this fee
    • the fee amount payable
    • payment details
    • the due date.

    It is important you use the correct payment reference number (PRN) when making a payment.

    Changes to legislation mean that for vacancy years that start from 9 April 2024, the vacancy fee will be double the foreign investment application fee. This applies for all residential properties that are within scope of vacancy fee.

    Example: calculating the vacancy fee

    Myeong purchased a newly developed townhouse for $850,000 as an investment property in Geelong. Myeong paid a foreign investment application fee $13,200 and settlement occurred on 1 August 2022. Each year in August, Myeong is required to lodge a vacancy fee return.

    If Myeong is liable for a vacancy fee, for:

    • the vacancy years 1 August 2022 to 31 July 2023 and 1 August 2023 to 31 July 2024, the fee would be the same as the foreign investment application fee of $13,200
    • the vacancy year 1 August 2024 to 31 July 2025, the vacancy fee will be double the foreign investment application fee. The vacancy fee will therefore be $26,400

    End of example

    If you acquired the dwelling under a New or near-new dwelling exemption certificate held by a developer, the vacancy fee payable will be based on what the foreign investment application fee would have been for the dwelling had the exemption certificate not been in place.

    If the application fee was waived, the vacancy fee is based on the lowest foreign investment application fee that would have been payable.

    In the case of joint tenants, only one vacancy fee will be payable. For tenants in common, the fee payable will be based on the foreign investment application fee that was payable by each individual tenant.

    For more information on fees, see Residential fees for a foreign person.

    Who must lodge a vacancy fee return

    You must lodge a vacancy fee return if you:

    The vacancy fee may also apply where a foreign person failed to submit a foreign investment application but purchased a residential property before 9 May 2017.

    Joint owners or multiple dwellings

    If the dwelling is owned by 2 or more people as joint tenants, you only need to lodge one vacancy fee return.

    If you own a share of a dwelling as a tenant in common, you must each lodge a vacancy fee return.

    When multiple dwellings are constructed on the land, you must lodge a vacancy fee return for each new dwelling constructed.

    When you are not required to lodge a vacancy fee return

    You are not required to lodge a vacancy fee return but are required to update your details if any of the following occur during a vacancy year:

    • the dwelling is sold or otherwise legally transferred (including if the owner dies)
    • you are no longer a foreign investor.

    You do not have to lodge a vacancy fee return if you own vacant land and a dwelling has not yet been constructed on the land. You must lodge a vacancy fee return once a dwelling has been constructed and for each new dwelling constructed.

    If any other changes occur, such as changes to your foreign person status or property, you can update your details.

    More information about conveyancers, real estate agents and other persons charging a fee for services is available the Tax Practitioners BoardExternal Link website.

    You should direct any questions relating to tax agent services to the Tax Practitioners BoardExternal Link.

    When to lodge a vacancy fee return

    Lodge your vacancy fee return within 30 days at the end of each vacancy year.

    The first day of the 30-day period is the day following the last day of the vacancy year.

    Email reminder to lodge

    We generally email you a reminder to lodge your vacancy fee return if your details are up to date on Online services for foreign investorsExternal Link.

    What is the vacancy year

    In applying the vacancy fee rules, a vacancy year is each successive period of 12 months starting on the occupation day for the dwelling during which you have continuously held an interest in the dwelling.

    A vacancy year is unique to each dwelling held by you. It is not a calendar year or a financial year.

    What is occupation day

    The occupation day is the first day you have the right to occupy the dwelling. This will typically be the:

    • settlement day for an established dwelling
    • day on which a fitness for occupancy certificate for a new dwelling was issued.

    When construction of a dwelling has been completed you will need to contact us with the occupancy date before you can lodge a vacancy fee return, see Troubleshooting Online services for foreign investors.

    Example: working out the vacancy year

    Edmond is a foreign person who purchased an apartment that settled on 5 October 2022. As this was the date the apartment could be lived in, the occupancy date for the apartment is 5 October 2022.

    As long as Edmond is the owner of the property and is a foreign person, he is required to lodge a vacancy fee return for each vacancy year.

    The vacancy year starts from the occupancy date for the apartment. For Edmond, the first vacancy year is 5 October 2022 to 4 October 2023.

    Edmond must lodge his first vacancy fee return by 3 November 2023. This is the date that is 30 days after his vacancy fee year ended on 4 October 2023.

    His vacancy year for each subsequent year is 5 October to 4 October.

    End of example

    When is a dwelling residentially occupied

    A dwelling is considered residentially occupied if any of these situations last for at least 183 days in a vacancy year:

    • The owner or a relative of the owner genuinely occupied the dwelling as a residence.
    • The dwelling was genuinely occupied as a residence subject to lease or license for minimum terms of 30 days.
    • The dwelling was made genuinely available as a residence on the rental market (with minimum terms of 30 days).

    Residential occupancy of at least 183 days does not need to be one continuous block of time. Residential occupancy can be made up of multiple continuous periods of at least 30 days throughout the vacancy year.

    If a dwelling is made available for a short-term lease of less than 30 days (including via web-based stay sites) it is not residentially occupied. These dwellings are liable for a vacancy fee.

    We consider a dwelling genuinely available for occupation as a residence (with a term of 30 days or more) if it is:

    • made available on the rental market
    • advertised publicly
    • available at a market rent.

    You may need to provide supporting evidence to prove a dwelling was residentially occupied during a vacancy year. For example, if you are requesting a fee waiver on the basis that the dwelling was occupied.

    How to lodge a vacancy fee return

    You should lodge a vacancy fee return using Online services for foreign investors. Select either:

    • Lodgments then Vacancy fee return
    • Lodge or pay vacancy fee return quick link.

    If the occupancy date is not listed on your asset in Online services for foreign investors, you will need to contact us with the date, see Troubleshooting Online services for foreign investors.

    For further details on how to lodge your return and pay the vacancy fee, see Lodge a vacancy fee return.

    Log in to Online services for foreign investors

    From July 2023 when you register a residential dwelling, you will receive an asset identification number (asset ID), previously known as a land registration number.

    If you:

    • received a vacancy fee reminder from us, the number will be in the email
    • have not received a vacancy fee reminder, you may need to register your asset first in Online services for foreign investors to receive an asset ID.

    Vacancy fee exemptions

    You do not pay a vacancy fee if you can show that your dwelling was incapable of being occupied as a residence for at least 183 days in a vacancy year. You must still lodge a vacancy fee return to claim this exemption.

    Your dwelling may be considered incapable of being occupied as a residence if any of the following apply:

    • The dwelling is damaged, unsafe or is otherwise unsuitable to be occupied as a residence.
    • The dwelling is undergoing substantial repairs or renovations.
    • Occupation of the dwelling as a residence is prohibited or legally restricted by an order of a court or tribunal or a law of the Commonwealth, state or territory.
    • A person (who may or may not be the foreign person) who ordinarily occupies the dwelling was absent from the dwelling due to receiving long-term, in-patient, medical or residential care.

    You may be required to provide acceptable supporting evidence to prove the dwelling was incapable of being occupied.

    Vacancy fee waivers

    We only waive or remit fees in limited circumstances.

    The vacancy fee waiver form is not available in Online services for foreign investors.

    For information on details we consider and how to make a request, see Request waiver of an application fee.

    Penalties that may apply if you do not lodge

    If you do not lodge your vacancy fee return by the due date, you may be liable to pay a vacancy fee. This is regardless of the number of days the dwelling was residentially occupied during the vacancy year.

    If you are directed to pay the vacancy fee for failing to lodge, you will receive an email from us. The email notice will provide the following information:

    • reason we are charging the fee
    • amount of the fee you have to pay
    • payment details
    • due date.

    You may be liable for an infringement notice or a civil penalty if you do not:

    • lodge a vacancy fee return on time
    • keep records that are relevant to your liability for vacancy fees.

    You are required to keep these records for at least 5 years after the end of each vacancy year.

    More information on compliance for residential land is available at the Foreign InvestmentExternal Link website.

    Update your details if your situation changes

    It is important to keep us up to date about your situation, so we can contact you about your property.

    If your situation changes, you must update your details in Online services for foreign investors or contact us.

    A change of situation may include where:

    • you are no longer considered a foreign person (foreign owner)
    • ownership of your property changes
    • the owner has died
    • the vacant land or redevelopment property does not have a dwelling on it, or construction is not complete
    • construction of a new dwelling has been completed and a certificate of occupancy was received.

    If your:

    How to report a breach of the foreign investment rules

    If you suspect you’ve breached your foreign investment conditions, contact us as soon as possible.

    If you know or suspect someone else has breached the foreign investment rules, you can confidentially report a breach to us.

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Net closes in murder investigation

    Source: South Australia Police

    Woodville Gardens man Bill Frangos was murdered more than three hours before his Essex Street home was set alight in a bid to destroy evidence, Major Crime Investigation Branch detectives have revealed.

    In a significant development in the murder investigation, detectives have also revealed they believe those responsible for the murder returned to the scene in a distinctive grey Holden Commodore shortly before lighting the fire.

    CCTV has revealed just after 3.30am on 7 November 2024 the grey Commodore – which has a silver front bumper panel, damage to the front passenger door and a black tyre rim on the front passenger side – was parked on Ridley Grove at Woodville Gardens, a short distance from Mr Frangos’ Essex Street house.

    A man wearing a backpack was seen walking from the grey Commodore towards the Essex Street house and a short time later CCTV captured it erupting in flames.

    The vision also shows what detectives believe to be the same man then running back to Ridley Grove and leaving the area in a southerly direction in the grey Commodore.

    In December detectives released CCTV of a red Ford Falcon XR6 utility leaving the vicinity of the murder. New CCTV footage reveals two people returning to this vehicle before it leaves. Investigations have revealed these two people are male of African appearance.

    This vehicle has been seized by detectives as part of the investigation.

    This new CCTV footage captured the two men walking between Mr Frangos’ address and back to the utility parked in nearby Parker Street on a number of occasions between 10.30pm and midnight on 6 November 2024.

    Detectives believe the same two men are responsible for Mr Frangos’ murder and the subsequent arson attack on his home. It is believed the two men and Mr Frangos were acquainted and the murder is not random.

    Major Crime Investigation Branch Officer-in-Charge Detective Superintendent Darren Fielke appealed for anyone with information on the whereabouts of the grey Commodore or who knows of any individual associated with it to contact police.

    “It is a distinctive vehicle, particularly with the silver front bumper panel, that people will certainly recognise,’’ he said.

    “The investigation is now moving rapidly, but we are still seeking information from the public to obtain more evidence that will assist us in rebuilding the full picture of what happened that night.

    “We are confident there will be a resolution in the case as investigations continue. The net is closing in on those responsible for Bill’s murder. Now is the time to come forward with information.’’

    Anyone with any information on the grey Commodore or those associated with it during the evening of Wednesday 6 November and the early hours of Thursday 7 November are urged to contact Crime Stoppers on 1800 333 000.

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-Evening Report: ‘I felt like I was the one in trouble.’ Collecting evidence after sexual assault can be scary for children – and the system needs to improve

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Caroline Whitehouse, PhD Candidate, School of Psychology & Public Health, La Trobe University

    Kaboompics.com/Pexels

    The 72 hours after the sexual assault of a child can be a crucial window for police to collect biological evidence and document signs of bruising or injury.

    But this procedure – known as a forensic medical examination – can be scary and invasive.

    In new research published with colleagues, I interviewed ten children (aged 4-16) and their parents about their experiences attending a Melbourne paediatric hospital in the hours after an alleged assault.

    This was a small group, but their stories shed light on wider concerns. Addressing them can help put children first in what may be the most traumatic time of their lives.

    What is a forensic medical examination?

    A forensic medical examination can be done in the 72 hours following a child sexual assault.

    Its purpose is to gather biological evidence from the victim to help police identify an offender and prosecute them.

    At a hospital crisis care suite, the child will speak to a specialist doctor (a forensic paediatrician) alongside another clinician, usually a psychologist or social worker. Police also attend.

    The doctor will take the child’s medical history, as well as asking for an account of the assault.

    The doctor swabs relevant areas – such as the child’s vulva, vagina or anus – to collect biological materials that may be present, including saliva or semen. They will also look for injuries or bruising.

    This examination can be uncomfortable and can take hours. It may also be emotionally harrowing, for the child as well as their carer.

    In the following days, children often need to give another statement to police and are referred for counselling.

    A child usually attends a forensic medical examination alongside their parent.
    fizkes/Shutterstock

    Understanding how to avoid retraumatisation

    A decade ago, the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse heard from survivors the importance of trauma-informed responses.

    A trauma-informed approach means prioritising a sense of safety for children who have experienced trauma, building trust and sharing control, to avoid retraumatisation.

    This means explaining to children and their carers what is going to happen next, gaining their consent and giving them some control over the timing and pace of any interventions (such as being swabbed).

    Children and families have different – sometimes traumatic – experiences of dealing with health services and police. So considering a child’s personal history and culture is important.

    However there is still little research examining children and young people’s experience of crisis care.

    My study involved seven girls, two boys and one non-binary child, aged between four and 16. In the days or weeks after their examination, I interviewed the child and the parent who attended hospital with them, both individually and together (in child-parent pairs).

    The interviews uncovered four areas that were important to children and their parents.

    1. Repeating their story but not feeling heard

    After they first report their experience, children need to tell their story several times to various strangers.

    This means sharing highly personal details while distressed to people who often don’t have the time to get to know them, their context, family, previous trauma history or culture.

    Fiona* (16) found this aspect of the process “very, very, very stressful.”

    Some said repeating their story felt like they had to convince professionals it was true.

    Layla (14) commented:

    I felt like I was the one in trouble.

    2. Being treated with care matters

    Several young participants discussed feeling “traumatised,” “intimidated” and “ashamed” during the examination itself.

    Seven-year-old Sasha told us about the doctor who examined her:

    She kept saying, ‘Lie still,’ and it was hard for me to just lie still. Then she just, when she did the examination […] I was crying on the bed, and it hurt me […]. And she just looked at me. Because she’s seen me crying and she just looked at me.

    But when the doctor, or the clinician was caring – and took time to understand them and their individual needs – it helped ease some of the distress.

    One parent, Kaye, felt the clinician “had this incredible demeanour and heart about her” and helped her child “understand what was going to happen.”

    Other young people appreciated the clinician helped them with panic attacks and “made us feel relaxed.”

    The youngest participant Ava (4) said she liked that she was given a teddy bear.

    Children told us caring gestures – such as providing a teddy bear – made the experience less scary.
    fizkes/Shutterstock

    3. Unpleasant surroundings made the experience worse

    Some participants described the space where the forensic medical examination took place as small and unwelcoming.

    Dylan (16) felt it was “unsafe”, while Ava said it was “a bit scary”.

    Examination spaces need to be kept forensically clean. In the hospital where these examinations took place, that meant there were no windows, pictures on the walls or soft furnishings.

    Several young participants felt it showed what had happened to them was somehow shameful. As Felicity explained:

    it was frightening. […] You’re just walking down a really long corridor, all these white […] ceilings and walls. And it was kind of just like a bit […] not welcoming, not nice and hidden away.

    Some children found the sterile environment intimidating.
    hxdbzxy/Shutterstock

    4. Parents need care too

    Parents often felt sidelined or unheard before, during and after the examination.

    Samira (a parent) said she didn’t feel like her concerns were understood:

    I come from a different background, I don’t know what is happening and I don’t know what to ask. I’m not very trusting of police.

    Children themselves worried about their parent. As Layla said:

    it’s not just me that’s going through this, it’s my mum. […] I feel like she should be able to have that support too. None of it was offered to her.

    One parent said they’d been “sent home without any support”. Another had a sense of being “just left there and wondering what to do”.

    Responding to the whole child

    The children and adults I interviewed made clear they wanted a holistic approach.

    They wanted professionals (including doctors, clinicians and police) to not only pursue justice on their behalf, but also listen and respond to their physical, emotional and social needs and take into account their particular context and culture.

    The response needs to make children and their families feel safer – not more scared.

    It also needs to help them recover from the trauma, including counselling for both parents and children without long waitlists.

    Existing services in the United States, Europe and the United Kingdom show an evidence-based, trauma-informed model is possible.

    The National Sexual Assault, Family and Domestic Violence Counselling Line – 1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732) – is available 24 hours a day, seven days a week for any Australian who has experienced, or is at risk of, family and domestic violence and/or sexual assault.

    *Names have been changed.

    Caroline Whitehouse is employed by the Northern Centre Against Sexual Assault, which is affiliated with the peak body Sexual Assault Support Services Victoria (SASVic). She was previously employed by the Royal Children’s Hospital Melbourne, where this study took place. The Royal Children’s Hospital, along with LaTrobe University, gave ethics approval for the study.

    ref. ‘I felt like I was the one in trouble.’ Collecting evidence after sexual assault can be scary for children – and the system needs to improve – https://theconversation.com/i-felt-like-i-was-the-one-in-trouble-collecting-evidence-after-sexual-assault-can-be-scary-for-children-and-the-system-needs-to-improve-241902

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI USA: Reed: Trump’s Cancellation of USDA Local Food Purchasing Programs Hurts Hungry Students & Families, Local Farmers, & the Economy

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Rhode Island Jack Reed

    WASHINGTON, DC – As the Trump Administration confirms it is halting more than $1 billion in federal assistance that enables public schools and food banks to purchase nutritious produce and food from local farmers, U.S. Senator Jack Reed (D-RI) says these cancellations will harm hungry students and low-income families, farmers and food producers, and local economies.

    The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) programs on the chopping block include the Local Food for Schools Cooperative Agreement Program and the Local Food Purchase Assistance Cooperative Agreement Program (LFPA). In a statement to The Hill, Trump’s USDA claimed that the essential programs that help provide nutritious food to hungry Americans “no longer effectuate the goals of the agency.”

    This year, the programs were set to distribute $660 million for schools and child care facilities and $500 million for food banks to work with local farmers within a set geographic range to purchase local food from farmers, fishermen, and food producers. The successful programs have increased access to locally-grown, nutritious food in underserved communities and helped family farmers, fishermen, and local food producers significantly expand their markets.

    Senator Reed joined with U.S. Senator Adam Schiff (D-CA) and 30 other colleagues in urging USDA Secretary Brooke Rollins to reverse course on these cuts and provide additional information about implementation of the USDA programs set to be cancelled.

    “At a time when food insecurity remains high, providing affordable, fresh food to food banks and families while supporting American farmers is critical. Notably, LFPA and LFS have benefitted producers and consumers by providing funding for purchases through all 50 states, four territories, and 84 tribal governments,” the Senators wrote. “Through LFPA and LFS, USDA has prioritized the procurement and distribution of healthy, nutritious, domestic food. It has also taken an important step towards igniting rural prosperity by expanding and strengthening markets among farmers and rural economies. As of December 2024, the programs had supported over 8,000 producers, providing increased marketing

    opportunities.

    According to Farm Fresh Rhode Island, these cuts would cost Rhode Island approximately $3 million and negatively impact about 100 small businesses in the Ocean State.

    Senator Reed noted that these drastic cuts come as Republican budget proposals threaten access to critical nutrition assistance programs and as the demand on local food banks across the nation continues to soar in Rhode Island and across the nation.

    “Making it harder for schools and food banks to serve up fresh, nutritious, local foods to students and struggling families is a shameful way to scrounge up cash for President Trump’s billionaires-first tax giveaway.  We know that hungry students do not perform as well in the classroom as their peers who have access to regular, nutritious meals. These reckless cuts to essential USDA programs will have an outsized impact on low-income families and on the local farmers, fishermen, and food producers who have benefitted significantly from expanded local markets for their goods,” said Senator Reed.  “Time and time again, President Trump has insisted that his Administration’s devastating cuts will magically not impact vulnerable American families. By cutting these vital USDA programs, he is making his priorities crystal clear – billionaires come first and American families come last.”

    During the COVID pandemic, Congress made $900 million available for U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) food purchasing efforts through the LFPA.  These programs helped strengthen local and regional food systems, improved agricultural supply-chain resiliency, and supported underserved producers and communities.  Using LFPA funds, states set up approved programs to purchase food produced within the state or within 400 miles of the delivery destination, which was then distributed through food banks, pantries, and other food distribution centers where hungry families in need can receive food.

    In Rhode Island, the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management (DEM), working with nonprofits like Farm Fresh Rhode Island, was awarded a total of $1.78 million to purchase local foods for distribution within the state.  To date, DEM, Farm Fresh, and their partners, have purchased food from 95 local producers and distributed that nutritious, local food to over 65,000 Rhode Islanders.

    Last year, Senator Reed introduced legislation that would codify LFPA into law, providing permanent funding to ensure the program continues. Reed’s EAT Local Foods Act gained the support of a wide range of farmers, food hubs, coalitions, and business networks across the nation in addition to several leading Rhode Island organizations, including: the Rhode Island Community Food Bank, Farm Fresh Rhode Island, the Commercial Fisheries Center of Rhode Island, the Rhode Island Food Policy Council, and Southside Community Land Trust.

    In addition to Senators Reed and Schiff, the letter was signed by U.S. Senators Chuck Schumer (D-NY); Ben Ray Luján (D-NM); Amy Klobuchar (D-MN); Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH); Tina Smith (D-MN); Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI); Ron Wyden (D-OR); Richard Blumenthal (D-CT); Martin Heinrich (D-NM); Chris Van Hollen (D-MD); Michael Bennet (D-CO); Elissa Slotkin (D-MI); Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY); Elizabeth Warren (D-MA); Jeff Merkley (D-OR); Raphael Warnock (D-GA); Tammy Baldwin (D-WI); Richard Durbin (D-IL); Catherine Cortez Masto (D-NV); Patty Murray (D-WA); Angus King (I-ME); Bernie Sanders (I-VT); John Hickenlooper (D-CO); Gary Peters (D-MI); Jacky Rosen (D-NV); Peter Welch (D-VT); Alex Padilla (D-CA); Cory Booker (D-NJ); Ed Markey (D-MA); and Mazie Hirono (D-HI).

    Full text of the letter follows:

    March 14, 2025

    Ms. Brooke Rollins

    Secretary

    U.S. Department of Agriculture

    1400 Independence Ave SW

    Washington, DC 20250

    Dear Secretary Rollins:

    We write to express serious concerns regarding the cancellation of U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) programs supporting local and regional food purchases providing assistance to those in need. These successful programs, the Local Food Purchase Assistance Cooperative Agreement Program (LFPA) and the Local Food for Schools Cooperative Agreement Program (LFS), allow states, territories, and Tribes to purchase local foods from nearby farmers and ranchers to be used for emergency food providers, schools, and child care centers.

    At a time when food insecurity remains high, providing affordable, fresh food to food banks and families while supporting American farmers is critical. Notably, LFPA and LFS have benefitted producers and consumers by providing funding for purchases through all 50 states, four territories, and 84 tribal governments.

    Through LFPA and LFS, USDA has prioritized the procurement and distribution of healthy, nutritious, domestic food. It has also taken an important step towards igniting rural prosperity by expanding and strengthening markets among farmers and rural economies. As of December 2024, the programs had supported over 8,000 producers, providing increased marketing

    opportunities.

    Most importantly, we ask that you reverse the cancellation of LFPA and LFS. We also ask that you provide a thorough and complete update on USDA’s implementation of LFPA and LFS,

    including answers to the following questions:

    1. What is the status of reimbursements for entities that have agreements with USDA through LFPA and LFS? What is the last date for which states, territories, and Tribes received reimbursements for food purchases under LFPA and LFS?
    2. Has the Administration conducted any assessments of how these program cancellations will impact producers and recipient organizations (e.g., food banks, schools, child care centers)? If so, please provide a copy of any such assessments.

    We have grave concerns that the cancellation of LFPA and LFS poses extreme harm to producers and communities in every state across the country. At a time of uncertainty in farm country, farmers need every opportunity to be able to expand market access for their products.

    Please provide responses to the information requested in our questions no later than Friday, April 4. Thank you for your attention to this urgent and important matter.

    Sincerely,

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Climate and Science – Extreme atmospheric rivers could double in future climate – NIWA

    Source: NIWA

    New Zealand could face twice as many of the most extreme atmospheric rivers by the end of the century, according to new research by the National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA) published today. Not only could the narrow bands of concentrated water vapour increase, but in the future rainfall from these ‘rivers in the sky’ is likely to make up a much bigger proportion of New Zealand’s total annual rainfall.
    The research, led by NIWA research assistant Felix Goddard, analysed the latest climate change projections released last year by NIWA and the Ministry for the Environment, and was recently published in the Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. 
    Co-author, NIWA climate scientist Dr Peter Gibson, says the study examined projections for the frequency and intensity of atmospheric rivers under a relatively high greenhouse gas emissions future. Only one scenario was investigated at this time.
    “Atmospheric rivers have been responsible for some of our biggest downpours in recent years, such as the West Coast flooding that took out the Waiho Bridge in March 2019, the widespread flooding in Westport in July 2021, and the exceptionally wet Auckland summer of 2022-2023. As an island nation surrounded by oceans, we experience atmospheric rivers when huge amounts of water vapour are transported down from the tropics and sub-tropics and make landfall. These ‘rivers in the sky’ cause heavy precipitation and flooding when they make landfall in New Zealand, producing extremely large rainfall totals, especially when they interact with mountainous terrain.”
    Dr Gibson says there are two reasons why atmospheric rivers are likely to increase in the future. “The first reason is that an overall warmer atmosphere can hold more water vapour, while the second reason why we may see an increase in atmospheric rivers is because of changes in wind patterns. Climate projections show changes to atmospheric circulation, with an intensification of the westerly jetstream over New Zealand with strong winds flowing west to east in the South Pacific region, and a shift of the jet towards the South Pole.”
    As well as finding that the most intense atmospheric rivers are likely to be more frequent and more intense, the researchers say that the phenomena may add up to 20 percent more to annual rainfall totals in some places. 
    “Overall, the biggest hotspot for these future changes is over the west coast of the South Island, where atmospheric rivers already often produce the largest impacts,” says Dr Gibson. 
    He says the latest climate projections for New Zealand, available on the Ministry for the Environment’s website, provide detailed information for every 5-kilometre square across the country. “The latest projections give us a much more comprehensive and detailed picture of our future climate. These updated climate change projections are based on refining the projections from six global climate models from the projections provided in the most recent report by the United Nations body that assesses the science related to climate change, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.”
    The more detailed information will enable better evidence-based discussion and choices, says Dr Gibson. “Development of these updated, high-resolution climate projections was a mammoth science and technology effort and involved huge supercomputing power. The dataset is now helping New Zealanders – including councils, companies and communities – to better understand their specific climate-related risks. In turn, this will improve decision-making for climate adaptation and support people to build resilience to extreme weather events.”
    More research is being undertaken by NIWA into specific climatic features in the projections, to provide clarity on the future climate New Zealanders are likely to face in the decades to come.
    Journal link:

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-OSI China: New policy supports unveiled to encourage consumption

    Source: China State Council Information Office

    The State Council Information Office holds a press conference on boosting consumption in Beijing, capital of China, March 17, 2025. [Photo/Xinhua]

    A new plan to expand consumer spending unveiled on Sunday is expected to encourage consumption and drive economic growth in China. The country has maintained its position as the world’s second-largest consumer market and largest e-commerce market for over a decade.

    Data released on Monday shows that retail sales of consumer goods — a major indicator of the country’s consumption strength — climbed 4 percent year on year in the first two months of 2025, 0.5 percentage points higher than the same period in 2024.

    Despite the positive data, consumer confidence remains weak due to multiple factors, and it remains imperative that consumption is boosted and domestic demand is expanded, Li Chunlin, deputy director of the National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC), said at a press conference on Monday.

    The plan is composed of 30 policies across eight sections, the first seven of which outline specific actions for implementation, including demand-side initiatives such as income enhancement for urban and rural residents, and measures to support consumption capacities.

    On the supply side, actions are aimed at improving the quality of services consumption, upgrading bulk consumption and enhancing consumption quality.

    The eighth section emphasizes the need to enhance supportive policies related to investment, finance, credit and statistics.

    Stock, real estate market stability 

    For the first time, the consumption support plan emphasizes the need to stabilize the stock and real estate markets.

    Previous consumption policies focused primarily on the supply side, emphasizing that supply drives demand creation. However, the latest policies also prioritize the demand side, aiming to boost household incomes and ease financial burdens, Li noted.

    He cited measures such as those related to reasonable wage growth and scientifically adjusted minimum wages, both of which are highlighted in the consumption support plan.

    To enhance property incomes, the plan calls for a multifaceted approach, including the stabilization of the stock market, strengthened strategic reserves and market stabilization mechanisms, and the accelerated removal of barriers preventing long-term funds — such as commercial insurance funds, the national social security fund and the basic pension insurance fund — from entering the market.

    To meet housing consumption needs in an improved manner, efforts will focus on curbing the downturn and restoring the stability of the real estate market, according to the plan.

    Financial authorities have been encouraging medium and long-term funds to enter the capital market to stabilize stock performance further.

    Since last year, Chinese policymakers have introduced a range of measures, including financial stimuli and regulatory adjustments, to bolster the property sector. These include mortgage rate cuts, decreased down payment requirements, eased purchasing restrictions and financing coordination mechanisms to enhance funding support for developers.

    Better consumption, well-being 

    By connecting consumer spending to broader social goals like elderly care improvement, child care support and work-life balance, the plan embeds consumption growth within China’s broader development objectives, signaling that consumption is being positioned not just as an economic goal but as a means to enhancing quality of life.

    Solid investments will continue to be made. For example, ultra-long special treasury bonds totaling 300 billion yuan (41.67 billion U.S. dollars) will be issued to support consumer goods trade-in programs in 2025, doubling the 2024 figure.

    The programs, which kicked off last March, drove equipment purchases and investment up by 15.7 percent in 2024, contributing 67.6 percent of overall investment growth, and boosted sales of bulk durable consumer goods by over 1.3 trillion yuan, according to the NDRC.

    Following its “employment first” policy, the central government plans to allocate 66.74 billion yuan in employment subsidies in 2025 to support local employment and startup assistance programs, said Fu Jinling, an official of the Ministry of Finance.

    China will consider establishing a child care subsidy system. It will guide eligible regions to include rural migrant workers, individuals engaged in flexible employment, and individuals engaged in new forms of employment who are covered by the basic medical insurance for employees, in the country’s childbirth insurance program, according to the plan.

    Regarding elderly care, the country will increase fiscal subsidies for basic old-age benefits and basic medical insurance for rural and non-working urban residents in 2025. Additionally, basic pension benefits for retirees will be raised appropriately.

    The country will work to implement its paid annual leave system, ensuring that workers’ rights to rest and vacation are legally protected. It will also prohibit the unlawful extension of working hours, according to the plan.

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI China: BMW partners with Huawei to develop in-car digital ecosystem

    Source: China State Council Information Office

    German carmaker BMW on Monday said it will work with Chinese tech giant Huawei to develop an in-car digital ecosystem specifically tailored for the Chinese market.

    According to the German auto behemoth, this cooperation means a deep integration with Huawei’s HarmonyOS NEXT, the Chinese company’s self-developed operating system that was built independent of the Android architecture.

    Built upon the operating system, BMW’s digital key functionality is set to debut later this year, allowing users to unlock, lock and start their vehicles using Huawei smartphones. Additionally, the integration with a Huawei smart interconnection solution will debut in 2026 on BMW’s locally produced next-generation electric models, the “Neue Klasse.”

    “In China, nearly a quarter of our mobile application users rely on Huawei devices. By deeply integrating with the HarmonyOS ecosystem, BMW will enhance in-car applications and digital connectivity services for HarmonyOS users, elevating intelligent experiences in high-frequency use scenarios,” said Sean Green, president and CEO of BMW Group Region China.

    The German company has approximately 460 local supplier partners in China and is accelerating collaboration with Chinese technology partners, particularly in cutting-edge technologies such as large language models, generative artificial intelligence and intelligent voice interaction.

    With research and development (R&D) centers in Beijing, Shanghai, Shenyang and Nanjing, BMW has established its largest R&D network outside of Germany in China.

    “China has emerged as a global engine of innovation,” said the senior executive. “Through collaboration with leading local technology partners in joint R&D and co-creation, BMW is leveraging its system integration expertise to advance local partnerships.”

    Believing in the potential of the Chinese car market, the German company announced a reinvestment to upgrade and modernize its Shenyang production base in 2024, following two decades of rapid expansion in the northeastern Chinese city.

    Since 2010, BMW’s total investment in its Shenyang production base has reached 116 billion yuan (about 16.18 billion U.S. dollars), making the city home to BMW’s largest production facility worldwide.

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Herpetologists hop to it

    Source: Auckland Council

    As World Frog Day leaps into our calendars (20 March), Auckland Council’s Environmental Services team is taking the opportunity to shine a spotlight on one of New Zealand’s most enigmatic and ancient amphibians – the Hochstetter’s frog.

    With a face only a herpetologist could love, this tiny, speckled creature may not have the fairy-tale charm of the Frog Prince, but its survival story is one of persistence against the odds.

    Auckland Council is embarking on a critical project aimed at safeguarding Hochstetter’s frog/pepeketua, an “At-Risk – Declining” species, in Tāmaki Makaurau. Ngāti Manuhiri kaitiaki will be actively involved in the project, as they accompany experienced contractors during their search for the frog.

    Frogs are often called ‘barometers of ecosystem health’ due to their sensitivity to environmental changes. As Auckland’s climate continues to shift and urban development expands, understanding how these frogs are faring could provide crucial insights into the broader health of our natural landscapes.

    Leading the charge is Senior Ecologist Alicia Wong, who hopes the research will provide valuable insights into the species and inform future conservation efforts.

    “The Hochstetter’s frog is a true survivor, capable of living over 30 years – longer than many of our household pets,” says Wong.

    “But while it has fared better than its close relatives, like Archey’s and Hamilton’s frogs, its numbers are still in decline. This survey will help us gain a deeper understanding of their population, distribution, and habitat quality, ensuring we have selected the best possible sites to prioritise for conservation programmes.”

    The first year of the survey was completed last summer and focused on identifying areas with the highest potential for suitable habitats, while the current year of the survey started this week and will involve a detailed survey of frog populations to inform conservation needs.

    Frogs have been around for an astonishing 360 million years, predating dinosaurs. However, despite their long evolutionary journey, amphibians are now among the most threatened creatures on the planet.

    Hochstetter’s frog (Leiopelma hochstetteri) is one of New Zealand’s most evolutionary distinct and globally endangered amphibians, with its lineage dating back over 70 million years. Found only in specific areas of the North Island, including the Auckland region, its conservation is particularly urgent.

    A staggering 41 per cent of amphibian species face extinction globally, outpacing the risk to mammals, reptiles, and birds. Habitat destruction, climate change, and disease are taking a heavy toll on frog populations worldwide.

    New Zealand is home to 14 native frog species, including Archey’s frog, Hamilton’s frog, Hochstetter’s frog and the enigmatic Aotea/Great barrier Island swimming frog.

    The Hochstetter’s is now considered to be 10 genetically distinct species that haven’t been formally described yet. Auckland has four of the species including the Hūnua Ranges population, Hochstetter’s frog “Great Barrier”, Hochstetter’s frog “Waitakere” and Hochstetter’s frog “Northland”, which includes the populations in Rodney. 

    However, don’t expect a chorus of croaks – our unique amphibians are earless and voiceless, preferring to keep things on the quieter side. While Archey’s and Hamilton frog are fully terrestrial, Hochstetter’s frog stands out as the only one that favours watery habitats, making its home in damp native forests, alongside streams, and beneath mossy rocks.

    To better understand the numbers and distribution of this primitive amphibian in the northern reaches of the Auckland region, Auckland Council’s Environmental Services team has begun a two-year survey across three different sites including Department of Conservation land and private properties.

    On Aotea/ Great Barrier Island Auckland council is working with herpetologists, The Windy Hill-Rosalie Bay Catchment Trust and Ngāti Rehua to monitor Hochstetter’s frog “Great Barrier”.

    Auckland Council’s Senior Regional Advisor Fauna Dr Sabine Melzer says this project has been running since 2012.

    “This long-term monitoring programme provides crucial insights into frog population trends on Aotea, guiding future conservation efforts,” Dr Melzer says.

    “Hochstetter’s frogs are nocturnal and inhabit cool, moist environments such as streams, waterfalls, and rocky crevices, relying on these habitats for survival.

    However, they face numerous threats, including habitat loss, predation by introduced species, and climate change,” explains Melzer

    This initiative reaffirms Auckland Council’s commitment to protecting the unique biodiversity of the Auckland region, helping to ensure Hochstetter’s frogs have the support they need to thrive. The project is a vital step in conserving New Zealand’s rare and precious wildlife, offering hope for the future of this ancient and remarkable frog.

    Auckland Council encourages residents to get involved in frog conservation by protecting local waterways, reducing the amount of sediment entering waterways, taking part in predator control and supporting habitat restoration projects.

    While we may not be able to turn a frog into a prince with a kiss, we can certainly do our part to ensure their survival for generations to come.

    As Kermit the Frog famously said, “It’s not easy being green.” But with a little effort, we can make it a whole lot easier for the Hochstetter’s frog to keep hopping along.

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-Evening Report: The Removalists remains a brutal commentary on Australian masculinity. This new production treats women with empathy

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Denise Varney, Professor of Theatre Studies, The University of Melbourne

    Pia Johnson/MTC

    The Removalists was first performed in 1971 at La Mama Theatre, Carlton, by the Australian Performing Group, an ensemble of young graduates, artists and friends.

    A beacon of the New Wave of Australian drama, David Williamson was part of a new generation of theatre artists who were interested in reflecting Australia back to its audiences. Now one of Australia’s most prolific playwrights, Williamson’s early plays are part of the repertoire of modern Australian classics.

    The Removalists was just his fourth play. A brutal commentary on Australian masculinity, it was a dark turn for the young artist.

    A crooked cop, an easily corruptible young constable, a boozy husband and father who beats his wife and demands his dinner, and a removalist who sees no evil, does no evil. A new production by the Melbourne Theatre Company, directed by Anne-Louise Sarks, celebrates the enduring appeal of the play.

    A suburban police station

    We begin in a police station. Young constable Neville Ross (William McKenna) is being inducted into the force by a bitter, manipulative, rule-bending sergeant, Dan Simmons (played with menace by the moustachioed Steve Mouzakis).

    When middle class sisters Kate (Jessica Clarke) and Fiona (Eloise Mignon) enter to report domestic violence, Simmonds asks invasive questions about Fiona’s relationship to her beer-swilling loudmouth husband Kenny (Michael Whalley).

    Fiona initially expressed uncertainty about making the complaint. Kate insisted on going to the police. The action that follows exposes the humiliation that accompanies reports of domestic violence.

    The production exposes the humiliation that accompanies reports of domestic violence.
    Pia Johnson/MTC

    In an excruciating moment, Kate stands by watching while Simmonds asks Fiona to show him the bruises on her back and upper thigh. Fiona is unsure as she turns her back to the auditorium, slowly pulls up her jumper and exposes the bruises on her bare back.

    Under Sarks’ direction, it is a moment filled with empathy.

    Enter the removalist

    The action shifts in act two to Fiona’s place. Expecting Kenny to be out drinking, Simmonds – who is expecting sexual favours from Kate – and Ross arrive to help Fiona move into her new flat. But Kenny is home, and sprays a string of obscenities at the policemen. Simmonds cuffs him – and lands a few quiet punches.

    The removalist (Martin Blum) interrupts the action, while turning a blind eye to the mayhem. The entrances and exits of the removalist and Ross and the moving of furniture, punctuate the drama with comic effect, injecting a light touch in the midst of the play’s violence.

    The removal of furniture injects a light touch in the midst of the play’s violence.
    Pia Johnson/MTC

    When the sisters and the removalist leave, the cops beat Kenny in an orgy of violence that is so relentless and brutal, it descends into farce.

    The bloody ending has something of the Grand Guignol to it – the 19th century theatre of revenge that descends into comic horror but also raises serious questions about violence in the contemporary real life world.

    Critiquing white Australia

    Clever balancing of humour and social commentary is the key to Williamson’s critique of the law in relation to violence against women.

    In an era of diverse casting, Sarks has cast The Removalists with an all white cast, laying the violence of the play at the feet of white Australian culture.

    Matilda Woodroofe’s costumes contribute to the play’s critique of Australian culture. Kenny wears a pair of footy shorts and a t-shirt, Blundstone boots and short black socks, evoking the unoffical uniform of the ocker male Australian.

    Onstage seating echos the intimate space of the original theatre, La Mama.
    Pia Johnson/MTC

    In a novel touch, Dale Ferguson’s set adds rows of onstage seating for those who would like a much closer view of the action. Not only do they get a stronger sense of the onstage actors’ energy and presence, they experience the play as the original audience did in the tiny La Mama theatre.

    Just as playwright Williamson targeted a conservative macho ocker culture in the early 1970s, this revival can be understood as its contemporary counterpart. Sarks highlights the particular kinds of violence that is systemic within Australian culture that continues today.

    Sarks accords the female characters more dignity and independence than earlier versions. They deliver the same lines, but with confidence that speaks of their self-assurance. Kate uses her gaze to put Simmonds, the disgusting older cop, in his place. After her humiliation at the police station, Fiona rejects Kenny’s appeals.

    Sarks accords the female characters dignity and independence.
    Pia Johnson/MTC

    These subtle and not so subtle changes in the delivery of the women’s lines show how directing an historical play can resist the ideologies that determined more passive roles for women in the past.

    The Removalists is at Melbourne Theatre Company until April 17.

    Denise Varney received funding from the Australian Research Council Discovery Project Scheme.

    ref. The Removalists remains a brutal commentary on Australian masculinity. This new production treats women with empathy – https://theconversation.com/the-removalists-remains-a-brutal-commentary-on-australian-masculinity-this-new-production-treats-women-with-empathy-252040

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-Evening Report: NZ has no dedicated database to track losses from weather disasters – without it, we’re planning in the dark

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Ilan Noy, Chair in the Economics of Disasters and Climate Change, Te Herenga Waka — Victoria University of Wellington

    STR/AFP via Getty Images

    Following the Trump administration’s abrupt cuts to USAID funding last month, the online international disaster database EM-DAT (normally funded by USAID) went dark for a week.

    EM-DAT collates data on the occurrence and impacts of thousands of mass disasters worldwide and records both human and economic losses in a publicly available dataset. It relies on various sources, including United Nations agencies and non-governmental organisations, but also news reports.

    The vulnerability of this database to the Trump administration’s cuts highlights the need for New Zealand to take charge of its own data on the damage caused by extreme events.

    Currently, New Zealand has no dedicated disaster loss database. This means we don’t know how much extreme weather events and other types of disasters are costing us.

    But as such events are becoming more frequent and more intense with worsening climate change, this lack of data is increasingly detrimental to our long-term prosperity.

    Two events in 2023 – Cyclone Gabrielle and the Auckland floods – illustrate this problem. They were by far the costliest weather disasters in New Zealand’s modern history and we know they were exceptionally damaging.

    But we don’t know the aggregate financial losses they caused, and the different sources shown in the table below provide conflicting numbers, none of them comprehensive.



    Without understanding the magnitude of the problem, our ability to prevent damage or recover from extreme weather is diminished. It is indeed difficult to manage what we don’t measure.

    In the face of these unknowns, most other countries, including Australia, are investing in the collection, collation and analysis of their own data to make informed decisions about disaster risk management. It is high time New Zealand did the same.

    The limits of New Zealand’s data on loss and damage

    Currently, data on extreme weather costs have come primarily from the Insurance Council of New Zealand (ICNZ) or from EM-DAT, whose data sometimes come from less reliable sources. New Zealand’s reliance on a private source and an international organisation leaves us with data that could charitably be described as fragmented, incomplete and unreliable.

    ICNZ figures showing insurance payouts for disasters are commonly used by the government and media as a proxy for total cost. But private insurance accounts for only a small share of the losses resulting from some extreme weather. Roads, bridges and many other parts of public infrastructure are not insured; many private assets are not insured either.

    Furthermore, wealthier communities tend to be better insured and hence receive higher payouts. The ICNZ data imply they experience more damages than poorer, less insured communities, even when that is not the case.

    As climate change brings more extreme weather, more homes will likely be under-insured.
    Phil Walter/Getty Images

    Globally, insurance tends to retreat when the risks become too high to be covered affordably. We expect that in the future a higher number of homes and businesses will be under-insured. Relying solely on data on insured damages will hence provide us with an increasingly partial picture of damages caused by extreme weather.

    The second main source of disaster loss data is EM-DAT. In principle, it aims to include all damage costs (not just insured ones), but the approach does not necessarily result in more accurate numbers.

    As the graph below shows, ICNZ can be counted on to provide reliable data for all large events, but there are frequent gaps in EM-DAT’s data for New Zealand. It is also clear that the difference between ICNZ private insurance payouts and total cost estimates from EM-DAT is too small to accurately reflect uninsured losses.



    In previous research (co-authored with Rebecca Newman) we identified other gaps in the EM-DAT international estimates of extreme-weather costs, most notably for wildfires, droughts and heatwaves.

    Damages from these events are largely uninsured and so are not included in the ICNZ data either. Yet their likelihood is increasing because of dramatic changes in our climate.

    We only have a partial picture, and a potentially very misleading one at that – both in terms of the size of the problem and how the problem is changing.
    Nevertheless, the data from the ICNZ and EM-DAT are still the best we have for understanding what is happening.

    When EM-DAT temporarily went offline last month following the termination of its funding from USAID, we received a crude reminder of how critical this resource is in the global context. How can we talk about disaster risk management and risk reduction when we have no idea what is going on?

    Effective policy relies on accurate data

    There are myriad ways in which a disaster-loss database for New Zealand could be used effectively by central and local government, insurance and banking companies, weather-exposed industries such as agriculture, community organisations and by individuals.

    Policies about flood protection, planned relocation (managed retreat), climate adaptation, insurance pricing, banking regulation, home loans and infrastructure maintenance should all be informed by knowledge of the risks from extreme-weather events and other hazards.

    A concrete example of how useful this data would be is for planned relocations. We need a clear perspective of the history of flood events in different communities and comprehensive assessments of past damages in order to quantify the future costs of relocations. Without these data, how can we decide which financial arrangements for relocation are fiscally sound?

    A comprehensive New Zealand disaster-loss database is possible. As a nation we have the datasets we need, but these are held within different government agencies and other organisations, with no centralised collection or reporting.

    Hidden there is everything we need to understand the current situation and plan better for the future. We just have to make the decision to invest in collecting and curating this data.

    Stats NZ would be the data’s logical host, given the agency’s extensive experience in collecting and posting data to help us organise our society. Cyclone Gabrielle and the Auckland floods should have convinced us we need this. Maybe EM-DAT going dark, and thus obscuring a worldwide risk, should convince us even more.


    I am grateful for the contribution of Jo-Anne Hazel (writing) and Tom Uher (data collection).


    Ilan Noy is a member of the scientific committee of EM-DAT (pro bono).

    ref. NZ has no dedicated database to track losses from weather disasters – without it, we’re planning in the dark – https://theconversation.com/nz-has-no-dedicated-database-to-track-losses-from-weather-disasters-without-it-were-planning-in-the-dark-251224

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz