NewzIntel.com

Category: India

  • MIL-OSI: Donegal Group Inc. Announces Second Quarter and First Half 2025 Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    MARIETTA, Pa., July 24, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Donegal Group Inc. (NASDAQ: DGICA) and (NASDAQ: DGICB) today reported its financial results for the second quarter and first half of 2025.

    Significant Items for Second Quarter of 2025 (all comparisons to second quarter of 2024):

    • Net premiums earned decreased 1.1% to $231.8 million
    • Combined ratio of 97.7%, compared to 103.0%
    • Net income of $16.9 million, or 46 cents per diluted Class A share, compared to $4.2 million, or 13 cents per diluted Class A share
    • Net investment gains (after tax) of $1.2 million, or 3 cents per diluted Class A share, compared to $0.6 million, or 2 cents per diluted Class A share, are included in net income
    • Annualized return on average equity of 11.3%, compared to 3.4%
    • Book value per share of $16.62 at June 30, 2025, compared to $14.48 at June 30, 2024

    Financial Summary

      Three Months Ended June 30,   Six Months Ended June 30,
        2025       2024     % Change     2025       2024     % Change
      (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
                           
    Income Statement Data                      
    Net premiums earned $ 231,775     $ 234,311       -1.1 %   $ 464,476     $ 462,060       0.5 %
    Investment income, net   12,540       11,068       13.3       24,524       22,041       11.3  
    Net investment gains   1,544       737       109.5       1,073       2,850       -62.4  
    Total revenues   247,148       246,773       0.2       491,953       487,913       0.8  
    Net income   16,866       4,153       306.1       42,071       10,108       316.2  
    Non-GAAP operating income1   15,647       3,571       338.2       41,224       7,857       424.7  
    Annualized return on average equity   11.3 %     3.4 %   7.9 pts     14.6 %     4.2 %   10.4 pts
                           
    Per Share Data                      
    Net income – Class A (diluted) $ 0.46     $ 0.13       253.8 %   $ 1.17     $ 0.31       277.4 %
    Net income – Class B   0.43       0.11       290.9       1.08       0.28       285.7  
    Non-GAAP operating income – Class A (diluted)   0.43       0.11       290.9       1.14       0.24       375.0  
    Non-GAAP operating income – Class B   0.40       0.10       300.0       1.06       0.22       381.8  
    Book value   16.62       14.48       14.8       16.62       14.48       14.8  
                           
                           

    1The “Definitions of Non-GAAP Financial Measures” section of this release defines and reconciles data that we prepare on an accounting basis other than U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”).

    Management Commentary

    Kevin G. Burke, President and Chief Executive Officer of Donegal Group Inc., stated, “We are pleased with the progress we have made and the results we delivered for both the second quarter and first half of 2025, which we believe reflect the strength of our strategic execution and underwriting discipline. A meaningful improvement in our core loss ratio for both periods underscores our commitment to disciplined risk management and sustainable profitability. As expected, net premiums written1 declined this quarter, as lower new business writings and planned attrition modestly outpaced ongoing premium rate increases and solid retention levels. As a proactive measure, we intentionally slowed new business writings in our personal lines of business to protect underwriting margins and ensure we remain focused on profitable growth opportunities. We continue to identify and pursue profitable new business opportunities in states and classes that match our objectives.

    “We reached a significant milestone in our multi-year systems modernization project with the successful deployment of our final major commercial lines systems release. During the second half of 2025, we will begin to roll out this enhanced platform on a state-by-state basis, enabling us to more effectively target and win key middle market accounts. When the rollout is completed in the first half of 2026, we will be operating on a single modern technology platform for all of our middle market and small business commercial product offerings.

    “As we look ahead, we remain focused on disciplined execution, organizational alignment and operational excellence to further strengthen our long-term competitive position and enhance value for our stockholders.”

    Insurance Operations

    Donegal Group is an insurance holding company whose insurance subsidiaries and affiliates offer property and casualty lines of insurance in three Mid-Atlantic states (Delaware, Maryland and Pennsylvania), five Southern states (Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia), eight Midwestern states (Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Michigan, Nebraska, Ohio, South Dakota and Wisconsin) and five Southwestern states (Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, Texas and Utah). Donegal Mutual Insurance Company and the insurance subsidiaries of Donegal Group conduct business together as the Donegal Insurance Group.

      Three Months Ended June 30,   Six Months Ended June 30,
        2025       2024     % Change     2025       2024     % Change
      (dollars in thousands)
                           
    Net Premiums Earned                      
    Commercial lines $ 138,527     $ 134,489       3.0 %   $ 274,743     $ 266,581       3.1 %
    Personal lines   93,248       99,822       -6.6       189,733       195,479       -2.9  
    Total net premiums earned $ 231,775     $ 234,311       -1.1 %   $ 464,476     $ 462,060       0.5 %
                           
    Net Premiums Written                      
    Commercial lines:                      
    Automobile $ 50,584     $ 47,089       7.4 %   $ 107,109     $ 100,603       6.5 %
    Workers’ compensation   24,243       27,591       -12.1       52,997       58,665       -9.7  
    Commercial multi-peril   56,478       55,870       1.1       117,268       113,373       3.4  
    Other   13,609       11,698       16.3       28,158       25,101       12.2  
    Total commercial lines   144,914       142,248       1.9       305,532       297,742       2.6  
    Personal lines:                      
    Automobile   52,741       62,427       -15.5       107,933       123,808       -12.8  
    Homeowners   33,590       39,608       -15.2       62,378       71,367       -12.6  
    Other   2,568       2,906       -11.6       5,062       5,714       -11.4  
    Total personal lines   88,899       104,941       -15.3       175,373       200,889       -12.7  
    Total net premiums written $ 233,813     $ 247,189       -5.4 %   $ 480,905     $ 498,631       -3.6 %
                           
                           

    Net Premiums Written

    The 5.4% decrease in net premiums written for the second quarter of 2025 compared to the second quarter of 2024, as shown in the table above, represents the net combination of a 1.9% increase in commercial lines net premiums written and a 15.3% decrease in personal lines net premiums written. The $13.3 million decrease in net premiums written for the second quarter of 2025 compared to the second quarter of 2024 included:

    • Commercial Lines: $2.7 million increase that we attribute primarily to solid retention and a continuation of renewal premium increases in lines other than workers’ compensation, offset partially by lower new business writings.
    • Personal Lines: $16.0 million decrease that we attribute primarily to planned attrition due to lower new business writings and non-renewal actions, offset partially by a continuation of renewal premium rate increases and solid retention.

    Underwriting Performance

    We evaluate the performance of our commercial lines and personal lines segments primarily based upon the underwriting results of our insurance subsidiaries as determined under statutory accounting practices. The following table presents comparative details with respect to the GAAP and statutory combined ratios1 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2025 and 2024:

      Three Months Ended   Six Months Ended
      June 30   June 30
        2025       2024       2025       2024  
                   
    GAAP Combined Ratios (Total Lines)              
    Loss ratio – core losses   50.1 %     55.0 %     52.1 %     56.8 %
    Loss ratio – weather-related losses   11.1       10.6       7.4       7.7  
    Loss ratio – large fire losses   5.2       5.3       4.3       5.9  
    Loss ratio – net prior-year reserve development   -1.3       -0.3       -2.9       -2.0  
    Loss ratio   65.1       70.6       60.9       68.4  
    Expense ratio   32.2       31.9       33.4       33.8  
    Dividend ratio   0.4       0.5       0.3       0.5  
    Combined ratio   97.7 %     103.0 %     94.6 %     102.7 %
                   
    Statutory Combined Ratios              
    Commercial lines:              
    Automobile   97.7 %     93.5 %     94.6 %     96.6 %
    Workers’ compensation   104.9       117.0       111.3       114.2  
    Commercial multi-peril   97.5       110.6       93.9       106.7  
    Other   119.8       94.3       100.6       88.3  
    Total commercial lines   101.0       104.9       97.8       103.3  
    Personal lines:              
    Automobile   79.3       95.6       82.2       97.7  
    Homeowners   115.1       103.1       99.0       102.7  
    Other   55.2       104.7       55.9       94.8  
    Total personal lines   91.7       98.6       87.5       99.4  
    Total lines   97.4 %     102.2 %     93.9 %     101.7 %
                   
                   

    Loss Ratio

    For the second quarter of 2025, the loss ratio decreased to 65.1%, compared to 70.6% for the second quarter of 2024. For the commercial lines segment, the core loss ratio, which excludes weather-related losses, large fire losses and net development of reserves for losses incurred in prior accident years, of 54.5% for the second quarter of 2025 decreased modestly from 54.8% for the second quarter of 2024. For the personal lines segment, the core loss ratio of 43.3% for the second quarter of 2025 decreased from 55.3% for the second quarter of 2024, due largely to the favorable impact of premium rate increases on net premiums earned for that segment.

    Weather-related losses were $25.8 million, or 11.1 percentage points of the loss ratio, for the second quarter of 2025, compared to $24.7 million, or 10.6 percentage points of the loss ratio, for the second quarter of 2024. Weather-related loss activity for the second quarter of 2025 was higher than our previous five-year average of $18.9 million, or 9.2 percentage points of the loss ratio, for second-quarter weather-related losses. Atlantic States Insurance Company, our largest insurance subsidiary, incurred $3.0 million in net losses from a catastrophic wind and hail loss event in April 2025, with Donegal Mutual assuming losses that subsidiary incurred from the event in excess of its retention under an intercompany catastrophe reinsurance agreement.

    Large fire losses, which we define as individual fire losses in excess of $50,000, for the second quarter of 2025 were $12.1 million, or 5.2 percentage points of the loss ratio. That amount was comparable to the large fire losses of $12.5 million, or 5.3 percentage points of the loss ratio, for the second quarter of 2024. We experienced a modest decrease in commercial property fire losses that was partially offset by a modest increase in homeowners fire losses compared to the prior-year quarter.

    Net favorable development of reserves for losses incurred in prior accident years reduced the loss ratio by 1.3 percentage points for the second quarter of 2025 and had virtually no impact for the second quarter of 2024. Our insurance subsidiaries experienced favorable development primarily in the personal automobile and homeowners lines of business, partially offset by adverse development in other commercial lines that we primarily attribute to higher-than-anticipated case reserve development.

    Expense Ratio

    The expense ratio was 32.2% for the second quarter of 2025, compared to 31.9% for the second quarter of 2024. The increase in the expense ratio primarily reflected higher underwriting-based incentive costs for agents and employees, partially offset by the favorable impact of ongoing expense management initiatives. The impact from costs that Donegal Mutual Insurance Company allocated to our insurance subsidiaries related to its ongoing systems modernization project peaked at approximately 1.3 percentage points of the full year 2024 expense ratio, and we expect that impact to subside gradually over the next several years. Allocated costs related to that project represented approximately 1.0 percentage point of the expense ratio for the second quarter of 2025, and we expect the full year 2025 expense ratio impact will also be approximately 1.0 percentage point.

    Investment Operations

    Donegal Group’s investment strategy is to generate an appropriate amount of after-tax income on its invested assets while minimizing credit risk through investment in high-quality securities. As a result, we had invested 95.4% of our consolidated investment portfolio in diversified, highly rated and marketable fixed-maturity securities at June 30, 2025.

      June 30, 2025   December 31, 2024
      Amount   %   Amount   %
      (dollars in thousands)
    Fixed maturities, at carrying value:              
    U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S.            
    government corporations and agencies $ 145,585       10.2 %   $ 170,423       12.3 %
    Obligations of states and political subdivisions   424,010       29.7       409,560       29.6  
    Corporate securities   441,603       30.9       440,552       31.8  
    Mortgage-backed securities   353,639       24.7       304,459       22.0  
    Allowance for expected credit losses   (1,374 )     -0.1       (1,388 )     -0.1  
    Total fixed maturities   1,363,463       95.4       1,323,606       95.6  
    Equity securities, at fair value   41,007       2.9       36,808       2.6  
    Short-term investments, at cost   24,764       1.7       24,558       1.8  
    Total investments $ 1,429,234       100.0 %   $ 1,384,972   100.0 %
                   
    Average investment yield   3.5 %         3.3 %    
    Average tax-equivalent investment yield   3.6 %         3.4 %    
    Average fixed-maturity duration (years)   5.2           5.2      
                   
                   

    Net investment income of $12.5 million for the second quarter of 2025 increased 13.3% compared to $11.1 million for the second quarter of 2024. The increase in net investment income primarily reflected an increase in average investment yield relative to the prior-year second quarter.

    Net investment gains of $1.5 million for the second quarter of 2025 were primarily related to unrealized gains in the fair value of equity securities held at June 30, 2025, offset partially by net realized investment losses on the sale of available-for-sale fixed-maturity securities. Net investment gains of $0.7 million for the second quarter of 2024 were primarily related to unrealized gains in the fair value of equity securities held at June 30, 2024.

    Our book value per share was $16.62 at June 30, 2025, compared to $15.36 at December 31, 2024, with the increase related to net income as well as $10.7 million of after-tax unrealized gains within our available-for-sale fixed-maturity portfolio during 2025 that increased our book value by $0.31 per share, offset partially by cash dividends declared.

    Definitions of Non-GAAP Financial Measures

    We prepare our consolidated financial statements on the basis of GAAP. Our insurance subsidiaries also prepare financial statements based on statutory accounting principles state insurance regulators prescribe or permit (“SAP”). In addition to using GAAP-based performance measurements, we also utilize certain non-GAAP financial measures that we believe provide value in managing our business and for comparison to the financial results of our peers. These non-GAAP measures are net premiums written, operating income or loss and statutory combined ratio.

    Net premiums written and operating income or loss are non-GAAP financial measures investors in insurance companies commonly use. We define net premiums written as the amount of full-term premiums our insurance subsidiaries record for policies effective within a given period less premiums our insurance subsidiaries cede to reinsurers. We define operating income or loss as net income or loss excluding after-tax net investment gains or losses, after-tax restructuring charges and other significant non-recurring items. Because our calculation of operating income or loss may differ from similar measures other companies use, investors should exercise caution when comparing our measure of operating income or loss to the measure of other companies.

    The following table provides a reconciliation of net premiums earned to net premiums written for the periods indicated:

      Three Months Ended June 30,   Six Months Ended June 30,
        2025       2024     % Change     2025       2024     % Change
      (dollars in thousands)
                           
    Reconciliation of Net Premiums                      
    Earned to Net Premiums Written                      
    Net premiums earned $ 231,775     $ 234,311       -1.1 %   $ 464,476     $ 462,060       0.5 %
    Change in net unearned premiums   2,038       12,878       -84.2       16,429       36,571       -55.1  
    Net premiums written $ 233,813     $ 247,189       -5.4 %   $ 480,905     $ 498,631       -3.6 %
                           
                           

    The following table provides a reconciliation of net income to operating income for the periods indicated:

      Three Months Ended June 30,   Six Months Ended June 30,
        2025       2024     % Change     2025       2024     % Change
      (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
                           
    Reconciliation of Net Income                      
    to Non-GAAP Operating Income                      
    Net income $ 16,866     $ 4,153       306.1 %   $ 42,071     $ 10,108       316.2 %
    Investment gains (after tax)   (1,219 )     (582 )     109.5       (847 )     (2,251 )     -62.4  
    Non-GAAP operating income $ 15,647     $ 3,571       338.2 %   $ 41,224     $ 7,857       424.7 %
                           
    Per Share Reconciliation of Net Income                      
    to Non-GAAP Operating Income                      
    Net income – Class A (diluted) $ 0.46     $ 0.13       253.8 %   $ 1.17     $ 0.31       277.4 %
    Investment gains (after tax)   (0.03 )     (0.02 )     50.0       (0.03 )     (0.07 )     -57.1  
    Non-GAAP operating income – Class A $ 0.43     $ 0.11       290.9 %   $ 1.14     $ 0.24       375.0 %
                           
    Net income – Class B $ 0.43     $ 0.11       290.9 %   $ 1.08     $ 0.28       285.7 %
    Investment gains (after tax)   (0.03 )     (0.01 )     200.0       (0.02 )     (0.06 )     -66.7  
    Non-GAAP operating income – Class B $ 0.40     $ 0.10       300.0 %   $ 1.06     $ 0.22       381.8 %
                           
                           

    The statutory combined ratio is a non-GAAP standard measurement of underwriting profitability that is based upon amounts determined under SAP. The statutory combined ratio is the sum of:

    • the statutory loss ratio, which is the ratio of calendar-year incurred losses and loss expenses, excluding anticipated salvage and subrogation recoveries, to premiums earned;
    • the statutory expense ratio, which is the ratio of expenses incurred for net commissions, premium taxes and underwriting expenses to premiums written; and
      • the statutory dividend ratio, which is the ratio of dividends to holders of workers’ compensation policies to premiums earned.

    The statutory combined ratio does not reflect investment income, federal income taxes or other non-operating income or expense. A statutory combined ratio of less than 100% generally indicates underwriting profitability.

    Dividend Information

    On July 17, 2025, we declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.1825 per share for our Class A common stock and $0.165 per share for our Class B common stock, which are payable on August 15, 2025 to stockholders of record as of the close of business on August 1, 2025.

    Pre-Recorded Webcast

    At approximately 8:30 am ET on Thursday, July 24, 2025, we will make available in the Investors section of our website a pre-recorded audio webcast featuring management commentary on our quarterly results and general business updates. You may listen to the pre-recorded webcast by accessing the link on our website at http://investors.donegalgroup.com. A supplemental investor presentation is also available via our website.

    About the Company

    Donegal Group Inc. is an insurance holding company whose insurance subsidiaries and affiliates offer property and casualty lines of insurance in certain Mid-Atlantic, Midwestern, Southern and Southwestern states. Donegal Mutual Insurance Company and the insurance subsidiaries of Donegal Group Inc. conduct business together as the Donegal Insurance Group. The Donegal Insurance Group has an A.M. Best rating of A (Excellent).

    The Class A common stock and Class B common stock of Donegal Group Inc. trade on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbols DGICA and DGICB, respectively. We are focused on several primary strategies, including achieving sustained excellent financial performance, strategically modernizing our operations and processes to transform our business, capitalizing on opportunities to grow profitably and providing superior experiences to our agents, policyholders and employees.

    Safe Harbor

    We base all statements contained in this release that are not historic facts on our current expectations. Such statements are forward-looking in nature (as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995) and necessarily involve risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements we make may be identified by our use of words such as “will,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “seek,” “estimate” and similar expressions. Our actual results could vary materially from our forward-looking statements. The factors that could cause our actual results to vary materially from the forward-looking statements we have previously made include, but are not limited to, adverse litigation and other trends that could increase our loss costs (including social inflation, labor shortages and escalating medical, automobile and property repair costs, including due to tariffs), adverse and catastrophic weather events (including from changing climate conditions), our ability to maintain profitable operations (including our ability to underwrite risks effectively and charge adequate premium rates), the adequacy of the loss and loss expense reserves of our insurance subsidiaries, the availability and successful operation of the information technology systems our insurance subsidiaries utilize, the successful development of new information technology systems to allow our insurance subsidiaries to compete effectively, business and economic conditions in the areas in which we and our insurance subsidiaries operate, interest rates, competition from various insurance and other financial businesses, terrorism, the availability and cost of reinsurance, legal and judicial developments, changes in regulatory requirements, our ability to attract and retain independent insurance agents, changes in our A.M. Best rating and the other risks that we describe from time to time in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We disclaim any obligation to update such statements or to announce publicly the results of any revisions that we may make to any forward-looking statements to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events or circumstances after the date of such statements.

    Investor Relations Contacts

    Karin Daly, Vice President, The Equity Group Inc.

    Phone: (212) 836-9623
    E-mail: kdaly@theequitygroup.com

    Jeffrey D. Miller, Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
    Phone: (717) 426-1931
    E-mail: investors@donegalgroup.com

    Financial Supplement

    Donegal Group Inc.
    Consolidated Statements of Income
    (unaudited; in thousands, except share data)
           
      Quarter Ended June 30,
        2025       2024  
           
    Net premiums earned $ 231,775     $ 234,311  
    Investment income, net of expenses   12,540       11,068  
    Net investment gains   1,544       737  
    Lease income   76       78  
    Installment payment fees   844       579  
    Other income, net   369       –  
    Total revenues   247,148       246,773  
           
    Net losses and loss expenses   150,917       165,360  
    Amortization of deferred acquisition costs   39,501       40,656  
    Other underwriting expenses   35,150       34,037  
    Policyholder dividends   819       1,187  
    Interest   337       155  
    Other expenses, net   –       365  
    Total expenses   226,724       241,760  
           
    Income before income tax expense   20,424       5,013  
    Income tax expense   3,558       860  
           
    Net income $ 16,866     $ 4,153  
           
    Net income per common share:      
    Class A – basic $ 0.47     $ 0.13  
    Class A – diluted $ 0.46     $ 0.13  
    Class B – basic and diluted $ 0.43     $ 0.11  
           
    Supplementary Financial Analysts’ Data      
           
    Weighted-average number of shares      
    outstanding:      
    Class A – basic   30,678,158       27,844,811  
    Class A – diluted   31,336,862       27,844,903  
    Class B – basic and diluted   5,576,775       5,576,775  
           
    Net premiums written $ 233,813     $ 247,189  
           
    Book value per common share      
    at end of period $ 16.62     $ 14.48  
           
    Annualized operating return on average equity   11.3 %     3.4 %
    Donegal Group Inc.
    Consolidated Statements of Income
    (unaudited; in thousands, except share data)
           
      Six Months Ended June 30,
        2025       2024  
           
    Net premiums earned $ 464,476     $ 462,060  
    Investment income, net of expenses   24,524       22,041  
    Net investment gains   1,073       2,850  
    Lease income   153       159  
    Installment payment fees   1,727       803  
    Total revenues   491,953       487,913  
           
    Net losses and loss expenses   282,950       316,257  
    Amortization of deferred acquisition costs   78,732       80,258  
    Other underwriting expenses   76,345       75,777  
    Policyholder dividends   1,578       2,241  
    Interest   670       309  
    Other expenses, net   93       810  
    Total expenses   440,368       475,652  
           
    Income before income tax expense   51,585       12,261  
    Income tax expense   9,514       2,153  
           
    Net income $ 42,071     $ 10,108  
           
    Net income per common share:      
    Class A – basic $ 1.19     $ 0.31  
    Class A – diluted $ 1.17     $ 0.31  
    Class B – basic and diluted $ 1.08     $ 0.28  
           
    Supplementary Financial Analysts’ Data      
           
    Weighted-average number of shares      
    outstanding:      
    Class A – basic   30,400,944       27,828,062  
    Class A – diluted   30,884,992       27,845,608  
    Class B – basic and diluted   5,576,775       5,576,775  
           
    Net premiums written $ 480,905     $ 498,631  
           
    Book value per common share      
    at end of period $ 16.62     $ 14.48  
           
    Annualized operating return on average equity   14.6 %     4.2 %
    Donegal Group Inc.
    Consolidated Balance Sheets
    (in thousands)
           
      June 30,   December 31,
        2025       2024  
      (unaudited)    
           
    ASSETS
    Investments:      
    Fixed maturities:      
    Held to maturity, at amortized cost $ 737,356     $ 705,714  
    Available for sale, at fair value   626,107       617,892  
    Equity securities, at fair value   41,007       36,808  
    Short-term investments, at cost   24,764       24,558  
    Total investments   1,429,234       1,384,972  
        57,437       52,926  
    Premiums receivable   198,885       181,107  
    Reinsurance receivable   411,125       420,742  
    Deferred policy acquisition costs   76,620       73,347  
    Prepaid reinsurance premiums   182,795       176,162  
    Other assets   51,739       46,776  
    Total assets $ 2,407,835     $ 2,336,032  
           
    LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
    Liabilities:      
    Losses and loss expenses $ 1,117,010     $ 1,120,985  
    Unearned premiums   635,538       612,476  
    Borrowings under lines of credit   35,000       35,000  
    Other liabilities   14,618       21,795  
    Total liabilities   1,802,166       1,790,256  
    Stockholders’ equity:      
    Class A common stock   339       329  
    Class B common stock   56       56  
    Additional paid-in capital   383,546       369,680  
    Accumulated other comprehensive loss   (17,517 )     (28,200 )
    Retained earnings   280,471       245,137  
    Treasury stock   (41,226 )     (41,226 )
    Total stockholders’ equity   605,669       545,776  
    Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $ 2,407,835     $ 2,336,032  

    The MIL Network –

  • India-UK CETA to boost Indian farmers’ global access and rural prosperity

    Source: Government of India

    Source: Government of India (4)

    The India–UK Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) will open new avenues of growth for Indian farmers. Focused on tariff elimination and improved market access, the deal promises to connect Indian agricultural producers with the UK’s high-value market, enhance rural prosperity, and strengthen India’s position in global agri-trade.

    Farmers – sow local, sell global

    Indian farming communities stand to gain from easier access to the UK market and more opportunities to sell their produce due to tariff elimination. Among others, UK will liberalise at entry into force Indian meats, dairy products, tea, coffee, spices, fruits, vegetables, fruit juices, and processed agriculture products. By unlocking preferential access to the UK’s USD 63.4 billion agricultural market, the CETA gives Indian farmers a direct route to a high-value global customer base and achieve better returns for their goods.

    The agreement takes fully into account the interests of Indian producers of sensitive agricultural products like dairy products, vegetables, apples, edible oils, oats, etc. by keeping those tariff lines under sensitive list.

    The agricultural sector also benefits from the non-application of safeguard duties on Indian exports. Farmers will benefit from commitments taken under the CETA to acknowledge traditional knowledge, especially in the patent process for genetic resources.

    Additionally, the CETA will facilitate inclusive and tech-agnostic innovation across diverse sectors, including agriculture sector.

    Collectively, the CETA is expected to ensure higher and more stable incomes for Indian farmers, promote rural prosperity, and secure long-term export opportunities—solidifying India’s place as a key player in global agricultural trade.

  • MIL-OSI USA: President Donald J. Trump Approves Major Disaster Declaration for Michigan

    Source: US Federal Emergency Management Agency

    Headline: President Donald J

    Trump Approves Major Disaster Declaration for Michigan

    President Donald J

    Trump Approves Major Disaster Declaration for Michigan

    WASHINGTON – FEMA announced that federal disaster assistance is available to the state of Michigan to supplement recovery efforts in the areas affected by the severe winter storm from March 28-30, 2025

    Public Assistance federal funding is available to the state, tribal and eligible local governments and certain private nonprofit organizations on a cost-sharing basis for emergency work and the repair and replacement of eligible facilities damaged by the severe winter storm in Alcona, Alpena, Antrim, Charlevoix, Cheboygan, Crawford, Emmet, Kalkaska, Mackinac, Montmorency, Oscoda, Otsego and Presque Isle counties and the Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians

    Darrin Ricketts has been named as the Federal Coordinating Officer for federal recovery operations in the affected area

    Additional designations may be made at a later date if requested by the state and warranted by the results of further damage assessments

     
    amy

    ashbridge
    Wed, 07/23/2025 – 19:59

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: President Donald J. Trump Approves Major Disaster Declaration for Indiana

    Source: US Federal Emergency Management Agency

    Headline: President Donald J

    Trump Approves Major Disaster Declaration for Indiana

    President Donald J

    Trump Approves Major Disaster Declaration for Indiana

    WASHINGTON — FEMA announced that federal disaster assistance is available to the state of Indiana to supplement recovery efforts in the areas affected by severe storms, straight-line winds, tornadoes and flooding from March 30 – April 9, 2025

    Public Assistance federal funding is available to the state, tribal and eligible local governments and certain private nonprofit organizations on a cost-sharing basis for emergency work and the repair and replacement of facilities damaged by the severe storms, straight-line winds, tornadoes and flooding in Bartholomew, Brown, Clark, Crawford, Decatur, Floyd, Franklin, Greene, Harrison, Jefferson, Lawrence, Madison, Marshall, Martin, Montgomery, Morgan, Orange, Owen, Perry, Switzerland, Vanderburgh, Warrick and Washington counties

    Joseph P

    Cirone has been named as the Federal Coordinating Officer for federal recovery operations in the affected area

    Additional designations may be made at a later date if requested by the state and warranted by the results of further damage assessments

     
    erika

    suzuki
    Wed, 07/23/2025 – 20:01

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: NASA Sets Launch Coverage for Earth-Tracking NISAR Satellite

    Source: NASA

    NASA will provide live coverage of launch activities for NISAR (NASA-ISRO Synthetic Aperture Radar), which is set to lift off at 8:10 a.m. EDT (5:40 p.m. IST), Wednesday, July 30, from Satish Dhawan Space Centre on India’s southeastern coast.
    A collaboration between NASA and the Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO), the first-of-its-kind satellite will lift off aboard an ISRO Geosynchronous Satellite Launch Vehicle on a mission to scan nearly all the Earth’s land and ice surfaces twice every 12 days.
    Watch live coverage of the launch on NASA+ and the agency’s YouTube channel. Learn how to watch NASA content through a variety of platforms, including social media.
    With its two radar instruments — an S-band system provided by ISRO and an L-band system provided by NASA — the NISAR mission will provide high-resolution data to help decision-makers, communities, and scientists monitor major infrastructure, agricultural fields, and movement of land and ice surfaces.
    Hailed as a critical part of a pioneering year for United States – India civil space cooperation by President Trump and Prime Minister Modi during their visit in Washington in February, the NISAR launch will advance U.S. – India cooperation and benefit the U.S. in areas such as agriculture and preparation and response to disasters like hurricanes, floods, and volcanic eruptions.
    NASA’s mission coverage is as follows (all times Eastern and subject to change based on real-time operations):
    Monday, July 28  
    12 p.m. – Prelaunch teleconference with the following participants:

    Karen St. Germain, director of Earth science, NASA Headquarters
    Gerald Bawden, NISAR program scientist, NASA Headquarters
    Shanna McClain, Disasters program manager, NASA Headquarters
    Phil Barela, NISAR project manager, NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL)
    Marco Lavalle, NISAR deputy project scientist, NASA JPL

    The teleconference will stream on JPL’s YouTube Channel.
    Members of the media may ask questions via phone during the teleconference. To register, media must provide their name and affiliation by 4 p.m. on Sunday, July 27, to Rexana Vizza at: rexana.v.vizza@jpl.nasa.gov. Questions may also be asked via social media with the hashtag #AskNISAR.
    Wednesday, July 30
    7 a.m. – Launch coverage begins on NASA+ and YouTube.
    The launch broadcast begins from NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Southern California, where the U.S. portion of the mission is managed.
    Follow launch events on NASA’s NISAR blog. 
    Watch, Engage on Social Media
    You can also stay connected by following and tagging these accounts:
    X: @NASA, @NASAEarth, @NASAJPL
    Facebook: NASA, NASA Earth, NASA JPL
    Instagram: @NASA, @NASAEarth, @NASAJPL
    Additional Resources
    The NISAR press kit features deeper dives into the mission as well as its science and technology.
    Explore NISAR videos as well as NISAR animations and b-roll media reel.
    The NISAR mission is the first joint satellite mission between NASA and ISRO, marking a new chapter in the growing collaboration between the two space agencies. The launch of NISAR, years in the making, builds on a strong heritage of successful programs, including Chandrayaan-1 and the recent Axiom Mission-4, which saw ISRO and NASA astronauts living and working together aboard the International Space Station for the first time.
    Learn more about the mission at:

    NISAR

    -end-
    Elizabeth Vlock / Karen FoxHeadquarters, Washington202-358-1600elizabeth.a.vlock@nasa.gov / karen.c.fox@nasa.gov
    Andrew Wang / Jane J. Lee Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif.626-379-6874 / 818-354-0307 andrew.wang@jpl.nasa.gov / jane.j.lee@jpl.nasa.gov

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI: TransUnion Announces Second Quarter 2025 Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    • Exceeded second quarter 2025 financial guidance across all key financial metrics
    • Delivered 9 percent organic constant currency revenue growth (10 percent reported) led by U.S. Financial Services
    • De-levered to 2.8x Leverage Ratio at quarter-end and repurchased $47 million shares through mid-July
    • Raising 2025 financial guidance, we now expect to deliver 6 to 7 percent revenue growth for the year on both a reported and organic constant currency basis

    CHICAGO, July 24, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — TransUnion (NYSE: TRU) (the “Company”) today announced financial results for the quarter ended June 30, 2025.

    Second Quarter 2025 Results

    Revenue:

    • Total revenue for the quarter was $1,140 million, an increase of 10 percent (10 percent on a constant currency basis and 9 percent on an organic constant currency basis), compared with the second quarter of 2024.

    Earnings:

    • Net income attributable to TransUnion was $110 million for the quarter, compared with $85 million for the second quarter of 2024. Diluted earnings per share was $0.56, compared with $0.44 in the second quarter of 2024. Net income attributable to TransUnion margin was 9.6 percent, compared with 8.2 percent in the second quarter of 2024.
    • Adjusted Net Income was $213 million for the quarter, compared with $193 million for the second quarter of 2024. Adjusted Diluted Earnings per Share was $1.08, compared with $0.99 in the second quarter of 2024.
    • Adjusted EBITDA was $407 million for the quarter, compared with $377 million for the second quarter of 2024, an increase of 8 percent (8 percent on a constant currency basis). Adjusted EBITDA margin was 35.7 percent, compared with 36.2 percent in the second quarter of 2024.

    “In the second quarter, TransUnion delivered strong results that again exceeded financial guidance,” said Chris Cartwright, President and CEO. “U.S. Markets revenue grew 10 percent, led by Financial Services and Insurance. International grew 6 percent on an organic constant currency basis, with India accelerating to 8 percent growth and Canada and Africa delivering double-digit growth.”

    “We are raising our 2025 guidance, reflecting strong results in the first half of the year and ongoing business momentum, balanced against continuing market uncertainty. We now expect revenue growth of 6 to 7 percent.”

    “After the last several years of investment, we are now focused on execution and value creation. Through our transformation, we now have more and better solutions than ever. We are already seeing the emerging benefits of our accelerated pace of innovation and believe we are well-positioned to drive a generation of industry-leading growth.”

    Second Quarter 2025 Segment Results

    Segment revenue and Adjusted EBITDA for the second quarter of 2025, which includes the revenue from Monevo in Consumer Interactive and United Kingdom and the corresponding Adjusted EBITDA in U.S. Markets and International, and the related growth rates compared with the second quarter of 2024 were as follows:

    (in millions) Second
    Quarter 2025    		   Reported
    Growth Rate    		   Constant
    Currency
    Growth Rate    		   Organic
    Constant
    Currency
    Growth Rate
    U.S. Markets:              
    Financial Services $ 420   17 %   17 %   17 %
    Emerging Verticals   324   5 %   5 %   5 %
    Consumer Interactive   147   3 %   3 %   2 %
    Total U.S. Markets Revenue $ 890   10 %   10 %   10 %
                   
    U.S. Markets Adjusted EBITDA $ 337   7 %   7 %   7 %
                   
    International:              
    Canada $ 42   9 %   10 %   10 %
    Latin America   34   (1 )%   4 %   4 %
    United Kingdom   67   19 %   13 %   5 %
    Africa   18   15 %   14 %   14 %
    India   67   5 %   8 %   8 %
    Asia Pacific   24   (7 )%   (8 )%   (8 )%
    Total International Revenue $ 253   7 %   7 %   6 %
                   
    International Adjusted EBITDA $ 108   7 %   8 %   8 %
                           

    Liquidity and Capital Resources

    Cash and cash equivalents was $688 million at June 30, 2025 and $679 million at December 31, 2024.

    For the six months ended June 30, 2025, cash provided by operating activities was $344 million, compared with $349 million in 2024. The decrease in cash provided by operating activities was primarily due to higher income tax payments, the timing of accounts receivable collections and higher bonus payouts, mostly offset by improved operating performance and lower interest expense in 2025 compared with 2024. For the six months ended June 30, 2025, cash used in investing activities was $224 million, compared with $127 million in 2024. The increase in cash used in investing activities was primarily due to our acquisition of Monevo, a current year investment in a note receivable and an increase in capital expenditures. For the six months ended June 30, 2025, capital expenditures were $145 million, compared with $131 million in 2024. Capital expenditures as a percent of revenue represented 7% and 6%, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2025 and 2024. For the six months ended June 30, 2025, cash used in financing activities was $127 million, compared with $150 million in 2024. Cash used in financing activities was lower primarily due to higher debt repayments in 2024, partially offset by stock buybacks in 2025.

    Third Quarter and Full Year 2025 Outlook

    Our guidance is based on a number of assumptions that are subject to change, many of which are outside of the control of the Company, including general macroeconomic conditions, interest rates and inflation. There are numerous evolving factors that we may not be able to accurately predict. There can be no assurance that the Company will achieve the results expressed by this guidance.

        Three Months Ended September 30, 2025   Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2025
    (in millions, except per share data)   Low   High   Low   High
    Revenue, as reported   $ 1,115     $ 1,135     $ 4,432     $ 4,472  
    Revenue growth1:                
    As reported     3 %     5 %     6 %     7 %
    Constant currency1, 2     3 %     5 %     6 %     7 %
    Organic constant currency1, 3     2 %     4 %     6 %     7 %
                     
    Net income attributable to TransUnion   $ 78     $ 87     $ 412     $ 432  
    Net income attributable to TransUnion growth     14 %     28 %     45 %     52 %
    Net income attributable to TransUnion margin     7.0 %     7.7 %     9.3 %     9.7 %
                     
    Diluted Earnings per Share   $ 0.39     $ 0.44     $ 2.07     $ 2.18  
    Diluted Earnings per Share growth     13 %     27 %     43 %     51 %
                     
    Adjusted EBITDA, as reported5   $ 397     $ 411     $ 1,580     $ 1,610  
    Adjusted EBITDA growth, as reported4     1 %     4 %     5 %     7 %
    Adjusted EBITDA margin     35.6 %     36.2 %     35.7 %     36.0 %
                     
    Adjusted Diluted Earnings per Share5   $ 0.99     $ 1.04     $ 4.03     $ 4.14  
    Adjusted Diluted Earnings per Share growth   (5 )%     — %     3 %     6 %
    1. Additional revenue growth assumptions:
      1. The impact of changing exchange rates is expected to have less than 0.5 point of headwind for Q3 2025 and less than 0.5 point of headwind for FY 2025.
      2. The impact of the recent acquisition is expected to have approximately 1 point of benefit for Q3 2025 and approximately 0.5 point of benefit for FY 2025.
      3. The impact of mortgage is expected to be approximately 2 points of benefit for Q3 2025 and 2 points of benefit for FY 2025.
      4. Constant currency growth rates assume foreign currency exchange rates are consistent between years. This allows financial results to be evaluated without the impact of fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates.
      5. Organic constant currency growth rates are constant currency growth excluding inorganic growth. Inorganic growth represents growth attributable to the first twelve months of activity for recent business acquisitions.
      6. Additional Adjusted EBITDA assumptions:
        1. The impact of changing foreign currency exchange rates is expected to have less than 0.5 point of headwind for Q3 2025 and less than 0.5 point of headwind for FY 2025.
        2. For a reconciliation of the above non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures, refer to Schedule 7 of this Earnings Release.

          3. Earnings Webcast Details

          In conjunction with this release, TransUnion will host a conference call and webcast today at 8:30 a.m. Central Time to discuss the business results for the quarter and certain forward-looking information. This session and the accompanying presentation materials may be accessed at www.transunion.com/tru. A replay of the call will also be available at this website following the conclusion of the call.

          About TransUnion (NYSE: TRU)

          TransUnion is a global information and insights company with over 13,000 associates operating in more than 30 countries. We make trust possible by ensuring each person is reliably represented in the marketplace. We do this with a Tru™ picture of each person: an actionable view of consumers, stewarded with care. Through our acquisitions and technology investments we have developed innovative solutions that extend beyond our strong foundation in core credit into areas such as marketing, fraud, risk and advanced analytics. As a result, consumers and businesses can transact with confidence and achieve great things. We call this Information for Good® — and it leads to economic opportunity, great experiences and personal empowerment for millions of people around the world.

          http://www.transunion.com/business

          Availability of Information on TransUnion’s Website

          Investors and others should note that TransUnion routinely announces material information to investors and the marketplace using SEC filings, press releases, public conference calls, webcasts and the TransUnion Investor Relations website. While not all of the information that the Company posts to the TransUnion Investor Relations website is of a material nature, some information could be deemed to be material. Accordingly, the Company encourages investors, the media and others interested in TransUnion to review the information that it shares on www.transunion.com/tru.

          Forward-Looking Statements

          This earnings release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements are based on the current beliefs and expectations of TransUnion’s management and are subject to significant risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements. Any statements made in this earnings release that are not statements of historical fact, including statements about our beliefs and expectations, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include information concerning possible or assumed future results of operations, including our guidance and descriptions of our business plans and strategies. These statements often include words such as “anticipate,” “expect,” “guidance,” “suggest,” “plan,” “believe,” “intend,” “estimate,” “target,” “project,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “may,” “will,” “forecast,” “outlook,” “potential,” “continues,” “seeks,” “predicts,” or the negatives of these words and other similar expressions.

          Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements, or that could materially affect our financial results or such forward-looking statements include:

        • macroeconomic effects and changes in market conditions, including the impact of tariffs, inflation, risk of recession, and industry trends and adverse developments in the debt, consumer credit and financial services markets, including the impact on the carrying value of our assets in all of the markets where we operate;
        • our ability to provide competitive services and prices;
        • our ability to retain or renew existing agreements with large or long-term customers;
        • our ability to maintain the security and integrity of our data;
        • our ability to deliver services timely without interruption;
        • our ability to maintain our access to data sources;
        • government regulation and changes in the regulatory environment;
        • litigation or regulatory proceedings;
        • our approach to the use of artificial intelligence;
        • our ability to effectively manage our costs;
        • our efforts to execute our transformation plan and achieve the anticipated benefits and savings;
        • our ability to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting or disclosure controls and procedures;
        • economic and political stability in the United States and risks associated with the international markets where we operate;
        • our ability to effectively develop and maintain strategic alliances and joint ventures;
        • our ability to timely develop new services and the market’s willingness to adopt our new services;
        • our ability to manage and expand our operations and keep up with rapidly changing technologies;
        • our ability to acquire businesses, successfully secure financing for our acquisitions, timely consummate our acquisitions, successfully integrate the operations of our acquisitions, control the costs of integrating our acquisitions and realize the intended benefits of such acquisitions;
        • our ability to protect and enforce our intellectual property, trade secrets and other forms of unpatented intellectual property;
        • our ability to defend our intellectual property from infringement claims by third parties;
        • the ability of our outside service providers and key vendors to fulfill their obligations to us;
        • further consolidation in our end-customer markets;
        • the increased availability of free or inexpensive consumer information;
        • losses against which we do not insure;
        • our ability to make timely payments of principal and interest on our indebtedness;
        • our ability to satisfy covenants in the agreements governing our indebtedness;
        • our ability to maintain our liquidity;
        • stock price volatility;
        • our dividend payments;
        • share repurchase plans;
        • dividend rate;
        • our reliance on key management personnel; and
        • changes in tax laws or adverse outcomes resulting from examination of our tax returns.

        There may be other factors, many of which are beyond our control, that may cause our actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements, including factors disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024, and any subsequent Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. You should evaluate all forward-looking statements made in this report in the context of these risks and uncertainties.

        The forward-looking statements contained in this earnings release speak only as of the date of this earnings release. We undertake no obligation to publicly release the result of any revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect the impact of events or circumstances that may arise after the date of this earnings release.

        For More Information

        TRANSUNION AND SUBSIDIARIES
        Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)
        (in millions, except per share data)
         
            June 30,
        2025        		   December 31,
        2024
        Assets        
        Current assets:        
        Cash and cash equivalents   $ 687.5     $ 679.5  
        Trade accounts receivable, net of allowance of $27.4 and $19.9     895.9       798.9  
        Other current assets     322.3       323.4  
        Total current assets     1,905.7       1,801.8  
        Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization of $536.4 and $506.3     228.5       203.5  
        Goodwill     5,256.7       5,144.3  
        Other intangibles, net of accumulated amortization of $2,522.2 and $2,294.5     3,238.7       3,257.5  
        Other assets     488.1       577.7  
        Total assets   $ 11,117.7     $ 10,984.8  
        Liabilities and stockholders’ equity        
        Current liabilities:        
        Trade accounts payable   $ 345.1     $ 294.6  
        Current portion of long-term debt     76.1       70.6  
        Other current liabilities     519.9       694.4  
        Total current liabilities     941.1       1,059.6  
        Long-term debt     5,060.4       5,076.6  
        Deferred taxes     370.7       415.3  
        Other liabilities     119.3       114.5  
        Total liabilities     6,491.5       6,666.0  
        Stockholders’ equity:        
        Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 100.0 million shares authorized; none issued or outstanding as of June 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024, respectively     —       —  
        Common stock, $0.01 par value; 1.0 billion shares authorized at June 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024, 201.4 million and 201.5 million shares issued at June 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024, respectively, and 194.8 million and 194.9 million shares outstanding as of June 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024, respectively     2.0       2.0  
        Additional paid-in capital     2,600.7       2,558.9  
        Treasury stock at cost; 6.7 million and 6.6 million shares at June 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024, respectively     (342.0 )     (334.6 )
        Retained earnings     2,571.1       2,357.9  
        Accumulated other comprehensive loss     (311.6 )     (367.2 )
        Total TransUnion stockholders’ equity     4,520.2       4,217.0  
        Noncontrolling interests     106.0       101.8  
        Total stockholders’ equity     4,626.2       4,318.8  
        Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity   $ 11,117.7     $ 10,984.8  
        TRANSUNION AND SUBSIDIARIES
        Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)
        (in millions, except per share data)
         
            Three Months Ended June 30,   Six Months Ended June 30,
              2025       2024       2025       2024  
        Revenue   $ 1,139.7     $ 1,040.8     $ 2,235.5     $ 2,062.0  
        Operating expenses                
        Cost of services (exclusive of depreciation and amortization below)     469.9       406.7       915.5       813.0  
        Selling, general and administrative     335.0       310.8       591.8       616.4  
        Depreciation and amortization     142.7       132.9       281.6       266.9  
        Restructuring     —       8.1       —       26.3  
        Total operating expenses     947.5       858.4       1,788.9       1,722.4  
        Operating income     192.2       182.4       446.6       339.6  
        Non-operating income and (expense)                
        Interest expense     (55.7 )     (67.9 )     (111.8 )     (136.5 )
        Interest income     8.8       6.7       17.3       12.1  
        Earnings from equity method investments     5.0       4.6       9.3       9.3  
        Other income and (expense), net     6.6       (5.1 )     (10.8 )     (20.8 )
        Total non-operating income and (expense)     (35.4 )     (61.7 )     (96.0 )     (135.9 )
        Income before income taxes     156.8       120.7       350.5       203.7  
        Provision for income taxes     (44.4 )     (31.0 )     (85.4 )     (44.1 )
        Net income     112.4       89.7       265.1       159.7  
        Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests     (2.8 )     (4.7 )     (7.4 )     (9.5 )
        Net income attributable to TransUnion   $ 109.6     $ 85.0     $ 257.7     $ 150.1  
                         
        Basic earnings per common share from:                
        Net income attributable to TransUnion   $ 0.56     $ 0.44     $ 1.32     $ 0.77  
        Diluted earnings per common share from:                
        Net income attributable to TransUnion   $ 0.56     $ 0.44     $ 1.31     $ 0.77  
        Weighted-average shares outstanding:                
        Basic     195.0       194.2       195.0       194.2  
        Diluted     197.2       195.2       197.2       195.3  

        As a result of displaying amounts in millions, rounding differences may exist in the table above.

        TRANSUNION AND SUBSIDIARIES
        Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
        (in millions)
         
            Six Months Ended June 30,
              2025       2024  
        Cash flows from operating activities:        
        Net income   $ 265.1     $ 159.7  
        Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:        
        Depreciation and amortization     281.6       266.9  
        Loss on repayment of loans     —       2.6  
        Deferred taxes     (54.1 )     (63.6 )
        Stock-based compensation     70.5       51.8  
        Other     29.1       19.5  
        Changes in assets and liabilities:        
        Trade accounts receivable     (98.4 )     (71.3 )
        Other current and long-term assets     8.0       45.1  
        Trade accounts payable     37.1       53.7  
        Other current and long-term liabilities     (195.1 )     (115.2 )
        Cash provided by operating activities     343.8       349.2  
        Cash flows from investing activities:        
        Capital expenditures     (145.4 )     (130.7 )
        Proceeds from sale/maturities of other investments     0.2       —  
        Investments in consolidated affiliates, net of cash acquired     (55.7 )     —  
        Investments in nonconsolidated affiliates and notes receivable     (25.0 )     (4.4 )
        Proceeds from the sale of investments in nonconsolidated affiliates     —       3.8  
        Other     2.2       4.8  
        Cash used in investing activities     (223.7 )     (126.5 )
        Cash flows from financing activities:        
        Proceeds from term loans     —       934.9  
        Repayments of term loans     —       (927.9 )
        Repayments of debt     (43.2 )     (99.4 )
        Debt financing fees     —       (13.5 )
        Dividends to shareholders     (45.1 )     (41.4 )
        Proceeds from issuance of common stock     10.5       12.4  
        Employee taxes paid on restricted stock units recorded as treasury stock     (7.4 )     (11.4 )
        Repurchase of common stock     (38.8 )     —  
        Distributions to noncontrolling interests     (3.3 )     (3.8 )
        Cash used in financing activities     (127.3 )     (150.1 )
        Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents     15.2       (5.6 )
        Net change in cash and cash equivalents     8.0       67.0  
        Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period     679.5       476.2  
        Cash and cash equivalents, end of period   $ 687.5     $ 543.2  

        As a result of displaying amounts in millions, rounding differences may exist in the table above.


        TRANSUNION AND SUBSIDIARIES
        Non-GAAP Financial Measures

        We present Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA, Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA Margin, Adjusted Net Income, Adjusted Diluted Earnings per Share, Adjusted Provision for Income Taxes, Adjusted Effective Tax Rate and Leverage Ratio for all periods presented. These are important financial measures for the Company but are not financial measures as defined by GAAP. These financial measures should be reviewed in conjunction with the relevant GAAP financial measures and are not presented as alternative measures of GAAP. Other companies in our industry may define or calculate these measures differently than we do, limiting their usefulness as comparative measures. Because of these limitations, these non-GAAP financial measures should not be considered in isolation or as substitutes for performance measures calculated in accordance with GAAP, including operating income, operating margin, effective tax rate, net income attributable to the Company, diluted earnings per share or cash provided by operating activities. Reconciliations of these non-GAAP financial measures to their most directly comparable GAAP financial measures are presented in the tables below.

        We present Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA, Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA Margin, Adjusted Net Income, Adjusted Diluted Earnings per Share, Adjusted Provision for Income Taxes and Adjusted Effective Tax Rate as supplemental measures of our operating performance because these measures eliminate the impact of certain items that we do not consider indicative of our cash operations and ongoing operating performance. These are measures frequently used by securities analysts, investors and other interested parties in their evaluation of the operating performance of companies similar to ours.

        Our board of directors and executive management team use Adjusted EBITDA as an incentive compensation measure for most eligible employees and Adjusted Diluted Earnings per Share as an incentive compensation measure for certain of our senior executives.

        Under the credit agreement governing our Senior Secured Credit Facility, our ability to engage in activities such as incurring additional indebtedness, making investments and paying dividends is tied to our Leverage Ratio which is partially based on Adjusted EBITDA. Investors also use our Leverage Ratio to assess our ability to service our debt and make other capital allocation decisions.

        Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA

        Management has excluded the following items from net income attributable to TransUnion in order to calculate Adjusted EBITDA for the periods presented:

        • Net interest expense is the sum of interest expense and interest income as reported on our Consolidated Statements of Operations.
        • Provision for income taxes, as reported on our Consolidated Statements of Operations.
        • Depreciation and amortization, as reported on our Consolidated Statements of Operations.
        • Stock-based compensation is used as an incentive to engage and retain our employees. It is predominantly a non-cash expense. We exclude stock-based compensation because it may not correlate to the underlying performance of our business operations during the period since it is measured at the grant date fair value and it is subject to variability as a result of performance conditions and timing of grants. These expenses are reported within cost of services and selling, general and administrative on our Consolidated Statements of Operations.
        • Operating model optimization program represents employee separation costs, facility lease exit costs and other business process optimization expenses incurred in connection with the transformation plan discussed further in “Results of Operations – Factors Affecting Our Results of Operations” in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2025. We exclude these expenses as we believe they are not directly correlated to the underlying performance of our business. Further, these costs will vary and may not be comparable during the transformation initiative as we progress toward an optimized operating model. These costs are reported primarily in restructuring and selling, general and administrative on our Consolidated Statements of Operations.
        • Accelerated technology investment includes Project Rise and the final phase of our technology investment announced in November 2023. Project Rise was announced in February 2020 and was originally expected to be completed in 2022. Following our acquisition of Neustar in December 2021, we recognized the opportunity to take advantage of Neustar’s capabilities to enhance and complement our cloud-based technology already under development as part of Project Rise. As a result, we extended Project Rise’s timeline to 2024 and increased the total estimated cost to approximately $240 million. In November 2023, we announced our plans to further leverage Neustar’s technology to standardize and streamline our product delivery platforms and to build a single global platform for fulfillment of our product lines. The additional investment is expected to be approximately $90 million during 2024 and 2025 and represents the final phase of the technology investment in our global technology infrastructure and core customer applications. We expect that the accelerated technology investment will fundamentally transform our technology infrastructure by implementing a global cloud-based approach to streamline product development, increase the efficiency of ongoing operations and maintenance and enable a continuous improvement approach to avoid the need for another major technology overhaul in the foreseeable future. The unique effort to build a secure, reliable and performant hybrid cloud infrastructure requires us to dedicate separate resources in order to develop the new cloud-based infrastructure in parallel with our current on-premise environment by maintaining our existing technology team to ensure no disruptions to our customers. The costs associated with the accelerated technology investment are incremental and redundant costs that will not recur after the program has been completed and are not representative of our underlying operating performance. Therefore, we believe that excluding these costs from our non-GAAP measures provides a better reflection of our ongoing cost structure. These costs are primarily reported in cost of services and therefore do not include amounts that are capitalized as internally developed software.
        • Mergers and acquisitions, divestitures and business optimization expenses are non-recurring expenses associated with specific transactions (exploratory or executed) and consist of (i) transaction and integration costs, (ii) post-acquisition adjustments to contingent consideration or to assets and liabilities that occurred after the acquisition measurement period, (iii) fair value and impairment adjustments related to investments and call and put options, including gains or losses on a step acquisition, (iv) transition services agreement income, and (v) a loss on disposal of a business. We exclude these expenses as we believe they are not directly correlated to the underlying performance of our business operations and vary depending upon the timing of such transactions. These expenses are reported in costs of services, selling, general and administrative and other income and (expenses), net, on our Consolidated Statements of Operations.
        • Net other adjustments principally relate to: (i) deferred loan fee expense from debt prepayments and refinancing, (ii) currency remeasurement on foreign operations, (iii) other debt financing expenses consisting primarily of revolving credit facility deferred financing fee amortization and commitment fees and expenses associated with ratings agencies and interest rate hedging, (iv) certain legal and regulatory expenses, net, and (v) other non-operating (income) expense. We exclude these expenses as we believe they are not directly correlated to the underlying performance of our business and create variability between periods based on the nature and timing of the expense or income. These costs are reported in selling, general and administrative and in non-operating income and expense, net as applicable based on their nature on our Consolidated Statements of Operations.

        Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA Margin

        Management defines Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA Margin as Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA divided by total revenue as reported.

        Adjusted Net Income

        Management has excluded the following items from net income attributable to TransUnion in order to calculate Adjusted Net Income for the periods presented:

        • Amortization of certain intangible assets represents non-cash amortization expenses related to assets that arose from our 2012 change in control transaction and business combinations occurring after our 2012 change in control. We exclude these expenses as we believe they are not directly correlated to the underlying performance of our business operations and vary dependent upon the timing of the transactions that give rise to these assets. Amortization of intangible assets is included in depreciation and amortization on our Consolidated Statements of Operations.
        • Stock-based compensation (see Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA above)
        • Operating model optimization program (see Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA above)
        • Accelerated technology investment (see Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA above)
        • Mergers and acquisitions, divestiture and business optimization (see Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA above)
        • Net other is consistent with the definition in Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA above except that other debt financing expenses and certain other miscellaneous income and expense that are included in the adjustment to calculate Adjusted EBITDA are excluded in the adjustment made to calculate Adjusted Net Income.
        • Total adjustments for income taxes relates to the cumulative adjustments discussed below for Adjusted Provision for Income Taxes. This adjustment is made for the reasons indicated in Adjusted Provision for Income Taxes below. Adjustments related to the provision for income taxes are included in the line item by this name on our Consolidated Statements of operations.

        Adjusted Diluted Earnings Per Share

        Management defines Adjusted Diluted Earnings per Share as Adjusted Net Income divided by the weighted-average diluted shares outstanding.

        Adjusted Provision for Income Taxes

        Management has excluded the following items from our provision for income taxes for the periods presented:

        • Tax effect of above adjustments represents the income tax effect of the adjustments related to Adjusted Net Income described above. The tax rate applied to each adjustment is based on the nature of each line item. We include the tax effect of the adjustments made to Adjusted Net Income to provide a comprehensive view of our adjusted net income.
        • Excess tax expense (benefit) for stock-based compensation is the permanent difference between expenses recognized for book purposes and expenses recognized for tax purposes, in each case related to stock-based compensation expense. We exclude this amount from the Adjusted Provision for Income Taxes in order to be consistent with the exclusion of stock-based compensation from the calculation of Adjusted Net Income.
        • Other principally relates to (i) deferred tax adjustments, including rate changes, (ii) infrequent or unusual valuation allowance adjustments, (iii) return to provision, tax authority audit adjustments, and reserves related to prior periods, and (iv) other non-recurring items. We exclude these items because they create variability that impacts comparability between periods.

        Adjusted Effective Tax Rate

        Management defines Adjusted Effective Tax Rate as Adjusted Provision for Income Taxes divided by Adjusted income before income taxes. We calculate adjusted income before income taxes by excluding the pre-tax adjustments in the calculation of Adjusted Net Income discussed above and noncontrolling interest related to these pre-tax adjustments from income before income taxes.

        Leverage Ratio

        Management defines Leverage Ratio as net debt divided by Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA for the most recent twelve-month period including twelve months of Adjusted EBITDA from significant acquisitions. Net debt is defined as total debt less cash and cash equivalents as reported on the balance sheet as of the end of the period.

        This earnings release presents constant currency growth rates assuming foreign currency exchange rates are consistent between years. This allows financial results to be evaluated without the impact of fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. This earnings release also presents organic constant currency growth rates, which assumes consistent foreign currency exchange rates between years and also eliminates the impact of our recent acquisitions. This allows financial results to be evaluated without the impact of fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates and the impacts of recent acquisitions.

        Free cash flow is defined as cash provided by operating activities less capital expenditures and is a measure we may refer to.

        Refer to Schedules 1 through 7 for a reconciliation of our non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure.

        SCHEDULE 1
        TRANSUNION AND SUBSIDIARIES
        Revenue and Adjusted EBITDA growth rates as Reported, CC, and Organic CC
        (Unaudited)
         
            For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2025 compared with
        the Three Months Ended June 30, 2024        		   For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2025 compared with
        the Six Months Ended June 30, 2024
            Reported   CC Growth1   Inorganic   Organic CC Growth2   Reported   CC Growth1   Inorganic   Organic CC Growth2
        Revenue:                                
        Consolidated   9.5 %   9.5 %   0.7 %   8.9 %   8.4 %   8.8 %   0.3 %   8.5 %
        U.S. Markets   10.0 %   10.0 %   0.3 %   9.8 %   9.3 %   9.3 %   0.1 %   9.2 %
        Financial Services   17.1 %   17.1 %   — %   17.1 %   15.9 %   15.9 %   — %   15.9 %
        Emerging Verticals   4.9 %   4.9 %   — %   4.9 %   5.4 %   5.4 %   — %   5.4 %
        Consumer Interactive   3.3 %   3.3 %   1.5 %   1.8 %   1.3 %   1.3 %   0.7 %   0.5 %
        International   7.4 %   7.4 %   2.0 %   5.5 %   4.9 %   6.7 %   1.0 %   5.7 %
        Canada   9.0 %   10.5 %   — %   10.5 %   4.8 %   8.7 %   — %   8.7 %
        Latin America   (1.0 )%   4.0 %   — %   4.0 %   (0.8 )%   5.5 %   — %   5.5 %
        United Kingdom   18.7 %   12.6 %   8.4 %   4.6 %   13.8 %   11.0 %   4.3 %   7.0 %
        Africa   15.0 %   13.7 %   — %   13.7 %   13.5 %   11.7 %   — %   11.7 %
        India   4.8 %   7.6 %   — %   7.6 %   0.5 %   4.0 %   — %   4.0 %
        Asia Pacific   (6.8 )%   (7.7 )%   — %   (7.7 )%   — %   — %   — %   — %
                                         
        Adjusted EBITDA:                                
        Consolidated   8.1 %   8.3 %   — %   8.3 %   9.4 %   10.2 %   — %   10.2 %
        U.S. Markets   6.8 %   6.8 %   — %   6.8 %   9.4 %   9.4 %   — %   9.4 %
        International   7.2 %   8.0 %   — %   7.9 %   4.9 %   7.6 %   — %   7.6 %
        1. Constant Currency (“CC”) growth rates assume foreign currency exchange rates are consistent between years. This allows financial results to be evaluated without the impact of fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates.
        2. Organic CC growth rate is the CC growth rate less the inorganic growth rate.
        SCHEDULE 2
        TRANSUNION AND SUBSIDIARIES
        Consolidated and Segment Revenue, Adjusted EBITDA, and Adjusted EBITDA Margin (Unaudited)
        (dollars in millions)
         
          Three Months Ended June 30,   Six Months Ended June 30,
            2025       2024       2025       2024  
        Revenue:              
        U.S. Markets gross revenue              
        Financial Services $ 419.9     $ 358.7     $ 823.5     $ 710.4  
        Emerging Verticals   323.6       308.5       638.5       606.0  
        Consumer Interactive   146.9       142.1       285.1       281.5  
        U.S. Markets gross revenue $ 890.4     $ 809.3     $ 1,747.0     $ 1,597.8  
                       
        International gross revenue              
        Canada $ 42.3     $ 38.8     $ 80.1     $ 76.5  
        Latin America   34.1       34.5       66.9       67.4  
        United Kingdom   67.2       56.6       126.1       110.8  
        Africa   18.2       15.8       35.1       30.9  
        India   66.6       63.5       135.3       134.6  
        Asia Pacific   24.5       26.2       51.5       51.5  
        International gross revenue $ 252.9     $ 235.4     $ 495.0     $ 471.7  
                       
        Total gross revenue $ 1,143.2     $ 1,044.7     $ 2,242.1     $ 2,069.6  
                       
        Intersegment revenue eliminations              
        U.S. Markets $ (1.9 )   $ (2.4 )   $ (3.5 )   $ (4.7 )
        International   (1.6 )     (1.5 )     (3.1 )     (3.0 )
        Total intersegment revenue eliminations $ (3.5 )   $ (3.9 )   $ (6.6 )   $ (7.6 )
                       
        Total revenue as reported $ 1,139.7     $ 1,040.8     $ 2,235.5     $ 2,062.0  
                       
        Adjusted EBITDA:              
        U.S. Markets $ 337.2     $ 315.8     $ 657.4     $ 600.9  
        International   108.0       100.8       217.8       207.6  
        Corporate   (38.2 )     (40.0 )     (71.0 )     (73.8 )
        Adjusted EBITDA Margin:1              
        U.S. Markets   37.9 %     39.0 %     37.6 %     37.6 %
        International   42.7 %     42.8 %     44.0 %     44.0 %
        1. Segment Adjusted EBITDA Margins are calculated using segment gross revenue and segment Adjusted EBITDA. Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA Margin is calculated using total revenue as reported and consolidated Adjusted EBITDA.
          Three Months Ended June 30,   Six Months Ended June 30,
            2025       2024       2025       2024  
        Reconciliation of Net income attributable to TransUnion to consolidated Adjusted EBITDA:              
        Net income attributable to TransUnion $ 109.6     $ 85.0     $ 257.7     $ 150.1  
        Net interest expense   47.0       61.2       94.5       124.4  
        Provision for income taxes   44.4       31.0       85.4       44.1  
        Depreciation and amortization   142.7       132.9       281.6       266.9  
        EBITDA $ 343.7     $ 310.1     $ 719.2     $ 585.4  
        Adjustments to EBITDA:              
        Stock-based compensation   40.2       27.8       70.5       51.9  
        Mergers and acquisitions, divestitures and business optimization1   (4.6 )     0.7       13.2       9.8  
        Accelerated technology investment2   23.2       18.2       43.3       36.8  
        Operating model optimization program3   5.4       14.6       15.2       39.1  
        Net other4   (0.8 )     5.2       (57.3 )     11.7  
        Total adjustments to EBITDA $ 63.3     $ 66.5     $ 85.0     $ 149.3  
        Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA $ 407.0     $ 376.6     $ 804.1     $ 734.7  
                       
        Net income attributable to TransUnion margin   9.6 %     8.2 %     11.5 %     7.3 %
        Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA margin5   35.7 %     36.2 %     36.0 %     35.6 %

        As a result of displaying amounts in millions, rounding differences may exist in the tables above and footnotes below.

          1. Mergers and acquisitions, divestitures and business optimization consisted of the following adjustments:
            Three Months Ended June 30,   Six Months Ended June 30,
              2025       2024       2025       2024  
        Transaction and integration costs   $ 2.9     $ 1.2     $ 8.2     $ 3.4  
        Fair value and impairment adjustments     (7.6 )     0.7       5.0       0.8  
        Post-acquisition adjustments     —       (1.2 )     —       5.7  
        Total mergers and acquisitions, divestitures and business optimization   $ (4.6 )   $ 0.7     $ 13.2     $ 9.8  
          2. Represents expenses associated with our accelerated technology investment to migrate to the cloud. There are three components of the accelerated technology investment: (i) building foundational capabilities, which includes establishing a modern, API-based and services-oriented software architecture, (ii) the migration of each application and customer data to the new enterprise platform, including the redundant software costs during the migration period, as well as the efforts to decommission the legacy system, and (iii) program enablement, which includes dedicated resources to support the planning and execution of the program. The amounts for each category of cost are as follows:
            Three Months Ended June 30,   Six Months Ended June 30,
              2025       2024       2025       2024  
        Foundational Capabilities   $ 4.2     $ 8.3     $ 11.7     $ 15.0  
        Migration Management     19.0       8.7       31.6       18.8  
        Program Enablement     —       1.2       —       2.9  
        Total accelerated technology investment   $ 23.2     $ 18.2     $ 43.3     $ 36.8  
          3. Operating model optimization consisted of the following adjustments:
            Three Months Ended June 30,   Six Months Ended June 30,
              2025       2024       2025       2024  
        Employee separation   $ —     $ 7.9     $ —     $ 24.6  
        Facility exit     —       0.2       —       1.7  
        Business process optimization     5.4       6.5       15.2       12.8  
        Total operating model optimization   $ 5.4     $ 14.6     $ 15.2     $ 39.1  
          4. Net other consisted of the following adjustments:
            Three Months Ended June 30,   Six Months Ended June 30,
              2025       2024       2025       2024  
        Deferred loan fee expense from debt prepayments and refinancing   $ —     $ 6.0     $ (0.1 )   $ 9.1  
        Other debt financing expenses     0.6       0.6       1.1       1.1  
        Currency remeasurement on foreign operations     (1.5 )     (1.3 )     (2.1 )     1.3  
        Legal and regulatory expenses, net     —       —       (56.0 )     —  
        Other non-operating (income) expense     0.2       (0.1 )     (0.1 )     0.2  
        Total other adjustments   $ (0.8 )   $ 5.2     $ (57.3 )   $ 11.7  
          5. Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA margin is calculated by dividing Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA by total revenue.
        SCHEDULE 3
        TRANSUNION AND SUBSIDIARIES
        Adjusted Net Income and Adjusted Diluted Earnings Per Share (Unaudited)
        (in millions, except per share data)
         
            Three Months Ended June 30,   Six Months Ended June 30,
              2025       2024       2025       2024  
        Income attributable to TransUnion   $ 109.6     $ 85.0     $ 257.7     $ 150.1  
                         
        Weighted-average shares outstanding:                
        Basic     195.0       194.2       195.0       194.2  
        Diluted     197.2       195.2       197.2       195.3  
                         
        Basic earnings per common share from:                
        Net income attributable to TransUnion   $ 0.56     $ 0.44     $ 1.32     $ 0.77  
        Diluted earnings per common share from:                
        Net income attributable to TransUnion   $ 0.56     $ 0.44     $ 1.31     $ 0.77  
                         
        Reconciliation of Net income attributable to TransUnion to Adjusted Net Income:                
        Net income attributable to TransUnion   $ 109.6     $ 85.0     $ 257.7     $ 150.1  
        Adjustments before income tax items:                
        Amortization of certain intangible assets1     73.1       71.3       143.9       143.3  
        Stock-based compensation     40.2       27.8       70.5       51.9  
        Mergers and acquisitions, divestitures and business optimization2     (4.6 )     0.7       13.2       9.8  
        Accelerated technology investment3     23.2       18.2       43.3       36.8  
        Operating model optimization program4     5.4       14.6       15.2       39.1  
        Net other5     (1.5 )     4.8       (58.2 )     10.7  
        Total adjustments before income tax items   $ 135.6     $ 137.4     $ 227.9     $ 291.6  
        Total adjustments for income taxes6     (32.1 )     (29.4 )     (64.8 )     (69.7 )
        Adjusted Net Income   $ 213.1     $ 193.0     $ 420.7     $ 372.0  
                         
        Weighted-average shares outstanding:                
        Basic     195.0       194.2       195.0       194.2  
        Diluted     197.2       195.2       197.2       195.3  
                         
        Adjusted Earnings per Share:                
        Basic   $ 1.09     $ 0.99     $ 2.16     $ 1.92  
        Diluted   $ 1.08     $ 0.99     $ 2.13     $ 1.90  
            Three Months Ended June 30,   Six Months Ended June 30,
              2025       2024       2025       2024  
        Reconciliation of Diluted earnings per share from Net income attributable to TransUnion to Adjusted Diluted Earnings per Share:                
        Diluted earnings per common share from:                
        Net income attributable to TransUnion   $ 0.56     $ 0.44     $ 1.31     $ 0.77  
        Adjustments before income tax items:                
        Amortization of certain intangible assets1     0.37       0.37       0.73       0.73  
        Stock-based compensation     0.20       0.14       0.36       0.27  
        Mergers and acquisitions, divestitures and business optimization2     (0.02 )     —       0.07       0.05  
        Accelerated technology investment3     0.12       0.09       0.22       0.19  
        Operating model optimization program4     0.03       0.08       0.08       0.20  
        Net other5     (0.01 )     0.02       (0.30 )     0.05  
        Total adjustments before income tax items   $ 0.69     $ 0.70     $ 1.16     $ 1.49  
        Total adjustments for income taxes6     (0.16 )     (0.15 )     (0.33 )     (0.36 )
        Adjusted Diluted Earnings per Share   $ 1.08     $ 0.99     $ 2.13     $ 1.90  

        Each component of earnings per share is calculated independently, therefore, rounding differences exist in the table above.

          1. Consists of amortization of intangible assets from our 2012 change-in-control transaction and amortization of intangible assets established in business acquisitions after our 2012 change-in-control transaction.
          2. Mergers and acquisitions, divestitures and business optimization consisted of the following adjustments:
            Three Months Ended June 30,   Six Months Ended June 30,
              2025       2024       2025       2024  
        Transaction and integration costs   $ 2.9     $ 1.2     $ 8.2     $ 3.4  
        Fair value and impairment adjustments     (7.6 )     0.7       5.0       0.8  
        Post-acquisition adjustments     —       (1.2 )     —       5.7  
        Total mergers and acquisitions, divestitures and business optimization   $ (4.6 )   $ 0.7     $ 13.2     $ 9.8  
          3. Represents expenses associated with our accelerated technology investment to migrate to the cloud. There are three components of the accelerated technology investment: (i) building foundational capabilities which includes establishing a modern, API-based and services-oriented software architecture, (ii) the migration of each application and customer data to the new enterprise platform, including the redundant software costs during the migration period, as well as the efforts to decommission the legacy system, and (iii) program enablement, which includes dedicated resources to support the planning and execution of the program. The amounts for each category of cost are as follows:
            Three Months Ended June 30,   Six Months Ended June 30,
              2025       2024       2025       2024  
        Foundational Capabilities   $ 4.2     $ 8.3     $ 11.7     $ 15.0  
        Migration Management     19.0       8.7       31.6       18.8  
        Program Enablement     —       1.2       —       2.9  
        Total accelerated technology investment   $ 23.2     $ 18.2     $ 43.3     $ 36.8  
          4. Operating model optimization consisted of the following adjustments:
            Three Months Ended June 30,   Six Months Ended June 30,
              2025       2024       2025       2024  
        Employee separation   $ —     $ 7.9     $ —     $ 24.6  
        Facility exit     —       0.2       —       1.7  
        Business process optimization     5.4       6.5       15.2       12.8  
        Total operating model optimization   $ 5.4     $ 14.6     $ 15.2     $ 39.1  
          5. Net other consisted of the following adjustments:
            Three Months Ended June 30,   Six Months Ended June 30,
              2025       2024       2025       2024  
        Deferred loan fee expense from debt prepayments and refinancing   $ —     $ 6.0     $ (0.1 )   $ 9.1  
        Currency remeasurement on foreign operations     (1.5 )     (1.3 )     (2.1 )     1.3  
        Legal and regulatory expenses, net     —       —       (56.0 )     —  
        Other non-operating (income) and expense     —       0.1       —       0.3  
        Total other adjustments   $ (1.5 )   $ 4.8     $ (58.2 )   $ 10.7  
          6. Total adjustments for income taxes represents the total of adjustments discussed to calculate the Adjusted Provision for Income Taxes.
        SCHEDULE 4
        TRANSUNION AND SUBSIDIARIES
        Adjusted Provision for Income Taxes and Adjusted Effective Tax Rate (Unaudited)
        (dollars in millions)
         
          Three Months Ended June 30,   Six Months Ended June 30,
            2025       2024       2025       2024  
        Income before income taxes $ 156.8     $ 120.7     $ 350.5     $ 203.7  
        Total adjustments before income tax items from Schedule 3   135.6       137.4       227.9       291.6  
        Adjusted income before income taxes $ 292.4     $ 258.1     $ 578.5     $ 495.3  
                       
        Reconciliation of Provision for income taxes to Adjusted Provision for Income Taxes:              
        Provision for income taxes   (44.4 )     (31.0 )     (85.4 )     (44.1 )
        Adjustments for income taxes:              
        Tax effect of above adjustments   (33.0 )     (31.7 )     (65.3 )     (66.7 )
        Eliminate impact of excess tax expense for stock-based compensation   (0.2 )     (0.1 )     0.3       0.9  
        Other1   1.1       2.5       0.2       (4.0 )
        Total adjustments for income taxes $ (32.1 )   $ (29.4 )   $ (64.8 )   $ (69.7 )
        Adjusted Provision for Income Taxes $ (76.5 )   $ (60.4 )   $ (150.3 )   $ (113.8 )
                       
        Effective tax rate   28.3 %     25.7 %     24.4 %     21.6 %
        Adjusted Effective Tax Rate   26.2 %     23.4 %     26.0 %     23.0 %

        As a result of displaying amounts in millions, rounding differences may exist in the table above.

          1. Other adjustments for income taxes include:
            Three Months Ended June 30,   Six Months Ended June 30,
              2025       2024       2025       2024  
        Deferred tax adjustments   $ (2.9 )   $ —     $ (7.4 )   $ (5.2 )
        Valuation allowance adjustments     (0.7 )     —       1.5       0.2  
        Return to provision, audit adjustments and reserves related to prior periods     3.9       3.3       4.9       2.3  
        Other adjustments     0.8       (0.8 )     1.2       (1.3 )
        Total other adjustments   $ 1.1     $ 2.5     $ 0.2     $ (4.0 )
        SCHEDULE 5
        TRANSUNION AND SUBSIDIARIES
        Leverage Ratio (Unaudited)
        (dollars in millions)
         
            Trailing Twelve Months Ended
        June 30, 2025
        Reconciliation of Net income attributable to TransUnion to Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA:    
        Net income attributable to TransUnion   $ 391.9  
        Net interest expense     206.8  
        Provision for income taxes     140.2  
        Depreciation and amortization     552.5  
        EBITDA   $ 1,291.4  
        Adjustments to EBITDA:    
        Stock-based compensation   $ 139.9  
        Mergers and acquisitions, divestitures and business optimization1     29.9  
        Accelerated technology investment2     90.8  
        Operating model optimization program3     71.0  
        Net other4     (47.2 )
        Total adjustments to EBITDA   $ 284.3  
        Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA     1,575.7  
        Adjusted EBITDA for Pre-Acquisition Period5     1.7  
        Leverage Ratio Adjusted EBITDA   $ 1,577.4  
             
        Total debt   $ 5,136.5  
        Less: Cash and cash equivalents     687.5  
        Net Debt   $ 4,449.0  
             
        Ratio of Net Debt to Net income attributable to TransUnion     11.4  
        Leverage Ratio     2.8  

        As a result of displaying amounts in millions, rounding differences may exist in the table above.

          1. Mergers and acquisitions, divestitures and business optimization consisted of the following adjustments:
            Trailing Twelve Months Ended
        June 30, 2025
        Transaction and integration costs   $ 16.0  
        Fair value and impairment adjustments     12.6  
        Post-acquisition adjustments     1.3  
        Total mergers and acquisitions, divestitures and business optimization   $ 29.9  
          2. Represents expenses associated with our accelerated technology investment to migrate to the cloud. There are three components of the accelerated technology investment: (i) building foundational capabilities which includes establishing a modern, API-based and services-oriented software architecture, (ii) the migration of each application and customer data to the new enterprise platform including the redundant software costs during the migration period, as well as the efforts to decommission the legacy system, and (iii) program enablement, which includes dedicated resources to support the planning and execution of the program. The amounts for each category of cost are as follows:
            Trailing Twelve Months Ended
        June 30, 2025
        Foundational Capabilities   $ 32.3  
        Migration Management     55.9  
        Program Enablement     2.5  
        Total accelerated technology investment   $ 90.8  
          3. Operating model optimization consisted of the following adjustments:
            Trailing Twelve Months Ended
        June 30, 2025
        Employee separation   $ —  
        Facility exit     40.5  
        Business process optimization     30.5  
        Total operating model optimization   $ 71.0  
          4. Net other consisted of the following adjustments:
            Trailing Twelve Months Ended
        June 30, 2025
        Deferred loan fee expense from debt prepayments and refinancings   $ 8.6  
        Other debt financing expenses     2.3  
        Currency remeasurement on foreign operations     (1.3 )
        Legal and regulatory expenses, net     (56.0 )
        Other non-operating (income) and expense     (0.8 )
        Total other adjustments   $ (47.2 )
          5. The trailing twelve months ended June 30, 2025 includes the nine months of Adjusted EBITDA related to Monevo prior to our acquisition in April 2025.
        SCHEDULE 6
        TRANSUNION AND SUBSIDIARIES
        Segment Depreciation and Amortization (Unaudited)
        (in millions)
         
          Three Months Ended June 30,   Six Months Ended June 30,
            2025         2024     2025       2024  
                       
        U.S. Markets $ 105.2     $   99.4   $ 206.4     $ 200.1  
        International   36.6         32.5     73.2       64.7  
        Corporate   0.9         1.0     2.0       2.0  
        Total depreciation and amortization $ 142.7     $   132.9   $ 281.6     $ 266.9  

        As a result of displaying amounts in millions, rounding differences may exist in the table above.

        SCHEDULE 7
        TRANSUNION AND SUBSIDIARIES
        Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Guidance (Unaudited)
        (in millions, except per share data)
         
          Three Months Ended September 30, 2025   Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2025
          Low   High   Low   High
        Guidance reconciliation of Net income attributable to TransUnion to Adjusted EBITDA:              
        Net income attributable to TransUnion $ 78     $ 87     $ 412     $ 432  
        Interest, taxes and depreciation and amortization   235       239       931       940  
        EBITDA $ 312     $ 326     $ 1,342     $ 1,372  
        Stock-based compensation, mergers, acquisitions divestitures and business optimization-related expenses and other adjustments1   85       85       238       238  
        Adjusted EBITDA $ 397     $ 411     $ 1,580     $ 1,610  
                       
        Net income attributable to TransUnion margin   7.0 %     7.7 %     9.3 %     9.7 %
        Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA margin2   35.6 %     36.2 %     35.7 %     36.0 %
                       
        Guidance reconciliation of Diluted earnings per share to Adjusted Diluted Earnings per Share:              
        Diluted earnings per share $ 0.39     $ 0.44     $ 2.07     $ 2.18  
        Adjustments to diluted earnings per share1   0.60       0.60       1.96       1.96  
        Adjusted Diluted Earnings per Share $ 0.99     $ 1.04     $ 4.03     $ 4.14  

        As a result of displaying amounts in millions, rounding differences may exist in the table above.

        1. These adjustments include the same adjustments we make to our Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted Net Income as discussed in the Non-GAAP Financial Measures section of our Earnings Release.
        2. Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA margin is calculated by dividing Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA by total revenue.

        The MIL Network –

  • India’s banking sector slated for key turnaround in Q3: Report

    Source: Government of India

    Source: Government of India (4)

    The third quarter (Q3) of FY26 is likely to mark a turning point for India’s banking sector, as net interest margins (NIMs) are expected to stabilise and earnings begin to recover, a new report said on Thursday.

    This positive outlook is supported by easing funding costs, the upcoming reduction in the Cash Reserve Ratio (CRR), and normalisation of credit costs, according to data compiled by Motilal Oswal Financial Services.

    As part of this recovery, private sector banks are showing impressive resilience in maintaining lending yields despite multiple repo rate cuts by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI).

    The report highlights that private banks have been able to raise their spreads on fresh loans — helping them protect profitability in a low-rate environment.

    In May 2025, the weighted average lending rate (WALR) on fresh loans for private banks rose by 7 basis points month-on-month, the report stated.

    This increase reflects strong pricing strategies and credit demand. The spread on fresh rupee loans over the repo rate for private banks has reached its highest level since August 2022 — now at 415 basis points.

    This indicates that the lenders are not only navigating the policy changes effectively but also maintaining healthy margins through strategic loan repricing.

    Private banks also outperformed in terms of WALR on outstanding loans. While the system-wide WALR on outstanding loans fell slightly to 9.67 per cent in May, private lenders saw a 2 basis point increase — bucking the trend.

    On the funding side, deposit rates are beginning to decline gradually. The weighted average term deposit rate (WATDR) for private banks slipped slightly to 7.19 per cent in May, with further reductions expected as banks implement savings and term deposit rate cuts ranging from 20 to 100 basis points.

    The full benefit of these reductions is likely to materialise in the second half of the fiscal year — easing funding pressures, as per the report.

    According to Motilal Oswal, while NIMs may remain under pressure in the near term, they are expected to bottom out by the second or third quarter of FY26.

    The planned phased CRR cut from September 2025 is expected to inject about Rs 2.5 lakh crore of durable liquidity into the banking system — further supporting margin recovery.

    Credit costs are also expected to decline as asset quality stabilises, particularly in the retail and microfinance segments.

    “This improvement will further support the earnings recovery anticipated in the latter half of FY26,” the report added.

    (IANS)

  • Israel studies Hamas reply to Gaza ceasefire plan as fighting continues

    Source: Government of India

    Source: Government of India (4)

    Israel is reviewing a revised response from Hamas to a proposed ceasefire and hostage release deal, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office said on Thursday, as Israeli air and ground strikes continued to pound the Gaza Strip.

    Hamas confirmed it had handed over a new proposal, but did not disclose its contents. A previous version, submitted late on Tuesday, was rejected by mediators as insufficient and was not even passed to Israel, sources familiar with the situation said.

    Both sides are facing huge pressure at home and abroad to reach a deal, with the humanitarian conditions inside Gaza deteriorating sharply amidst widespread, acute hunger in the Palestinian enclave that has shocked the world.

    A senior Israeli official was quoted by local media as saying the new text was something Israel could work with. However, Israel’s Channel 12 said a rapid deal was not within reach, with gaps remaining between the two sides, including over where the Israeli military should withdraw to during any truce.

    A Palestinian official close to the talks told Reuters the latest Hamas position was “flexible, positive and took into consideration the growing suffering in Gaza and the need to stop the starvation”.

    Dozens of people have starved to death in Gaza the last few weeks as a wave of hunger crashes on the Palestinian enclave, according to local health authorities. The World Health Organization said on Wednesday 21 children under the age of five were among those who died of malnutrition so far this year.

    Israel, which cut off all supplies to Gaza from the start of March and reopened it with new restrictions in May, says it is committed to allowing in aid but must control it to prevent it from being diverted by militants.

    It says it has let in enough food for Gaza’s 2.2 million people over the course of the war, and blames the United Nations for being slow to deliver it; the U.N. says it is operating as effectively as possible under conditions imposed by Israel.

    AIRSTRIKES

    The war between Israel and Hamas has been raging for nearly two years since Hamas killed some 1,200 people and took 251 hostages from southern Israel in the deadliest single attack in Israel’s history.

    Israel has since killed nearly 60,000 Palestinians in Gaza, decimated Hamas as a military force, reduced most of the territory to ruins and forced nearly the entire population to flee their homes multiple times.

    Israeli forces on Thursday hit the central Gaza towns of Nuseirat, Deir Al-Balah and Bureij.

    Health officials at Al-Awda Hospital said three people were killed in an airstrike on a house in Nuseirat, three more died from tank shelling in Deir Al-Balah, and separate airstrikes in Bureij killed a man and a woman and wounded several others.

    Nasser hospital said three people were killed by Israeli gunfire while seeking aid in southern Gaza near the so-called Morag axis between Khan Younis and Rafah. The Israeli military said Palestinian militants had fired a projectile overnight from Khan Younis toward an aid distribution site near Morag. It was not immediately clear whether the incidents were linked.

    Washington has been pushing the warring sides towards a deal for a 60-day ceasefire that would free some of the remaining 50 hostages held in Gaza in return for prisoners jailed in Israel, and allow in aid.

    U.S. Middle East peace envoy Steve Witkoff travelled to Europe this week for meetings on the Gaza war and a range of other issues.

    An Israeli official said Strategic Affairs Minister Ron Dermer would meet Witkoff on Friday if the gaps between Israel and Hamas over the terms of a ceasefire had narrowed sufficiently.

    Hamas is facing growing domestic pressure amid deepening humanitarian hardship in Gaza and continued Israeli advances.

    Mediators say the group is seeking a withdrawal of Israeli troops to positions held before March 2, when Israel ended a previous ceasefire, and the delivery of aid under U.N. supervision.

    That would exclude a newly formed U.S.-based group, the Gaza Humanitarian Fund, which began handing out food in May at sites located near Israeli troops who have shot dead hundreds of Palestinians trying to get aid.

    (Reuters)

  • India Celebrates Income Tax Day 2025: A tribute to digital transformation and taxpayer empowerment

    Source: Government of India

    Source: Government of India (4)

    India today commemorates Income Tax Day, marking the 165th anniversary of the introduction of income tax in the country. Celebrated every year on July 24, the day acknowledges the evolution of India’s tax system and its pivotal role in nation-building.

    Income tax was first introduced in India on this day in 1860 by British economist Sir James Wilson to counter the financial strain caused by the First War of Independence in 1857. The framework laid then eventually culminated in the Income Tax Act of 1922 and later the comprehensive Income Tax Act of 1961, which still governs the taxation system in the country today.

    In recent decades, India’s income tax system has undergone a profound digital transformation, shifting from manual record-keeping to a tech-enabled, citizen-friendly administration. The process began with the introduction of the Permanent Account Number (PAN) in 1972, followed by initial computerization in 1981. The current PAN series, introduced in 1995, enabled better tracking and compliance.

    A major technological leap came with the establishment of the Centralized Processing Centre (CPC) in Bengaluru in 2009, allowing for jurisdiction-free, digital processing of tax returns. The Tax Information Network (TIN), and its upgraded version TIN 2.0, further enhanced convenience, offering real-time tax credits and quicker refunds. The Demand Facilitation Centre in Mysuru now serves as a central repository for outstanding tax demands, easing access for both taxpayers and officials.

    The government’s focus on transparency and data-driven governance is also reflected in the use of Project Insight. This integrated data platform enables the Income Tax Department (ITD) to create a 360-degree financial profile of taxpayers by integrating data from various sources, such as GSTN, financial institutions, and property registries. These insights help in detecting discrepancies and prompting voluntary compliance through non-intrusive nudges.

    The Faceless Assessment Scheme, launched in 2019, has revolutionized tax assessments by removing physical interaction between the taxpayer and the tax officer. Taxpayers now receive automated notices, assessments, and communications through a digital platform, enhancing accountability and efficiency.

    Additionally, the Annual Information Statement (AIS), implemented in November 2021, provides individuals with a consolidated view of their financial activity across the year. It pre-fills income tax returns using verified third-party data, minimizing errors and promoting self-compliance. This, along with the e-Verification Scheme, allows discrepancies to be resolved entirely online.

    As part of a continued effort to simplify compliance and encourage voluntary participation, the Finance Act, 2025 has extended the deadline for filing updated income tax returns from 24 months to 48 months. This amendment gives taxpayers more time to correct errors and avoid penalties while ensuring fair contribution.

    Tax collection trends underline the success of these reforms. The total number of Income Tax Returns (ITRs) filed rose by 36% over the past five years, reaching 9.19 crore filings in FY 2024–25, compared to 6.72 crore in FY 2020–21. Gross Direct Tax Collections also saw a sharp rise—from ₹12.31 lakh crore in 2020–21 to ₹27.02 lakh crore in 2024–25, reflecting both economic resilience and improved compliance.

    The Union Budget 2025–26 introduced several relief measures to ease the tax burden on individuals. Under the new tax regime, income up to ₹12 lakh is now tax-free. With the standard deduction of ₹75,000, salaried individuals with income up to ₹12.75 lakh will have zero tax liability. These measures are expected to boost household spending, particularly among the middle class.

    Other notable changes include an increase in TDS and TCS thresholds, decriminalization of TCS payment delays, and full tax exemption for withdrawals from National Savings Scheme (NSS) accounts made after August 29, 2024. The time limit for registering small charitable trusts has also been extended, while taxpayers with two self-occupied properties can now claim exemptions for both without restrictions.

    Significantly, the Income Tax Bill, 2025 has been tabled to replace the Income Tax Act of 1961. While retaining the core principles, the new bill seeks to simplify the language of tax laws, remove redundant provisions, and improve clarity for taxpayers and professionals alike.

  • Russian plane crashes in Russia’s far east, nearly 50 people on board feared dead

    Source: Government of India

    Source: Government of India (4)

    An Antonov An-24 passenger plane carrying about 50 people crashed in Russia’s far east on Thursday and initial information suggested that everyone on board was killed, Russian emergency services officials said.

    The burning fuselage of the plane, which was from the Soviet era and was nearly 50 years old, was spotted on the ground by a helicopter and rescue crews were rushing to the scene.

    Unverified video, shot from a helicopter and posted on social media, appeared to show that the plane had come down in a densely forested area.

    The plane, whose tail number showed it was built in 1976, was operated by a Siberia-based airline called Angara.

    It was en route from the city of Blagoveshchensk to Tynda and dropped off radar screens while approaching Tynda, a remote town in the Amur region bordering China.

    There were 43 passengers, including five children, and six crew members on board according to preliminary data, Vasily Orlov, the regional governor said.

    The emergencies ministry put the number of people on board somewhat lower, at around 40.

    Debris from the plane was found on a hill around 15 km (10 miles) from Tynda, the Interfax news agency quoted emergency service officials as saying.

    “During the search operation, a Mi-8 helicopter belonging to Rossaviatsiya discovered the fuselage of the aircraft, which was on fire,” Yuliya Petina, an emergency services official, wrote on Telegram.

    “Rescuers continue to make their way to the scene of the accident”.

    Authorities announced an investigation into the crash.

    (Reuters)

  • Manufacturing drives India’s flash PMI to 60.7 in July, private sector shows robust growth

    Source: Government of India

    Source: Government of India (4)

    India’s private sector showed robust growth in July, fuelled by strong manufacturing and global demand, the HSBC Flash India Composite Purchasing Managers’ Index (PMI) showed on Thursday.

    The headline HSBC Flash India Composite PMI Output Index, compiled by S&P Global, rose to 60.7 in July from 58.4 in June.

    The Manufacturing PMI index climbed to 59.2 in July from 58.4 in June – its highest level in nearly 17-and-a-half years.

    The Services PMI was 59.8 in July, down from 60.4 in June. While services activity continued to grow, the pace of expansion softened, according to the note.

    “India’s flash composite PMI remained healthy in July at 60.7. The strong performance was bolstered by growth in total sales, export orders, and output levels. Indian manufacturers led the way, recording faster rates of expansion than services for all of the three aforementioned metrics,” said Pranjul Bhandari, chief India economist at HSBC.

    International orders received by private sector firms in India rose sharply at the start of the second fiscal quarter (Q2 FY26).

    “Meanwhile, inflationary pressures continue to heat up as both input costs and output charges rose in July. Finally, business confidence fell to its lowest mark since March 2023, while employment growth moderated,” Bhandari noted.

    The Indian companies remained optimistic about output growth over the next 12 months.

    There is a firm pick-up in employment, especially in the service sector, suggesting healthy job creation accompanies the expansion of both India’s manufacturing and service sectors, according to the note.

    While goods producers indicated the slowest increase in output for three months during May, service providers reported the fastest rise since March 2024.

    At the composite level, the latest upturn was the quickest in just over a year. Monitored companies attributed growth to buoyant demand, investment in technology and expanded capacities, said the HSBC survey.

    (IANS)

  • Supreme Court stays Bombay HC verdict acquitting 12 accused in 2006 Mumbai train blasts case

    Source: Government of India

    Source: Government of India (4)

    The Supreme Court of India on Thursday stayed a Bombay High Court judgment that acquitted 12 men convicted in the 2006 Mumbai train bombings, after the Maharashtra government argued that the ruling could undermine ongoing cases under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA).

    The court made it clear that its order would not affect the release of the 12 men, all of whom had already been freed following their acquittal.

    A bench of Justices M.M. Sundresh and N. Kotiswar Singh also issued notices to all 12 acquitted individuals and sought their responses to the state’s appeal.

    Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the Maharashtra government, told the court that the state was not seeking to reverse the release of the accused but was concerned about the broader implications of the High Court’s findings. Accepting the argument, the bench said the Bombay High Court’s ruling would not carry precedential value until further orders.

    The High Court, in its judgment delivered on July 21, had overturned the 2015 convictions of the 12 men by a special MCOCA court. Five of the accused had been sentenced to death and the rest to life imprisonment. The court found that the prosecution had failed to establish the charges beyond reasonable doubt, describing the investigation as flawed and marred by procedural lapses.

    Additionally, the court found serious issues with the reliability of eyewitness accounts.

    On July 11, 2006, seven bombs exploded in packed Mumbai local trains, bringing the city to a standstill within 11 minutes.

    The coordinated terror attack left 189 dead and over 800 injured.

  • Parliament Monsoon Session: Lok Sabha adjourned till 2 pm amid sloganeering by Opposition

    Source: Government of India

    Source: Government of India (4)

    The fourth day of the Monsoon Session of Parliament saw continued disruption, with the Lok Sabha adjourned until 2 pm on Thursday following protests by Opposition members over the controversial Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar.

    As the House convened at 11 am, Opposition MPs raised slogans and staged a noisy protest, demanding a debate on the Election Commission’s SIR initiative.

    Speaker Om Birla repeatedly appealed for order, but the protests continued, forcing him to suspend proceedings early.

    This marks the fourth consecutive day of disruptions in Parliament, with the Opposition pressing for discussions not only on the Bihar voter verification drive but also on the recent Pahalgam terror attack and Operation Sindoor.

    Before the adjournment, Birla urged Opposition members to maintain decorum, saying the conduct in the House was falling short of expectations.

    Earlier in the day, senior Congress leaders Sonia Gandhi and Priyanka Gandhi Vadra joined the protest at Makar Dwar. Priyanka was seen holding a placard that read, “Democracy in Danger.”

    Opposition leaders have alleged that the SIR exercise unfairly targets marginalised groups and migrant populations, calling it an attempt at “institutional voter cleansing.” Congress MP Manickam Tagore submitted an adjournment motion under Rule 56, describing the EC’s move as “unconstitutional” and an attack on the fundamental right to vote.

    Outside Parliament, AAP Rajya Sabha MP Sanjay Singh echoed these concerns, claiming that residents from Bihar and Purvanchal living in Delhi are being harassed and disenfranchised.

    On Wednesday, both Houses of Parliament had been adjourned multiple times before being suspended for the day.

    (With inputs from IANS)

  • Russia, Ukraine discuss more POW swaps; no deal on ceasefire or leaders’ meeting

    Source: Government of India

    Source: Government of India (4)

    Russia and Ukraine discussed further prisoner swaps on Wednesday at a brief session of peace talks in Istanbul, but the sides remained far apart on ceasefire terms and a possible meeting of their leaders.

    “We have progress on the humanitarian track, with no progress on a cessation of hostilities,” Ukraine’s chief delegate Rustem Umerov said after talks that lasted just 40 minutes.

    He said Ukraine had proposed a meeting before the end of August between Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelenskiy and Russian President Vladimir Putin. He added: “By agreeing to this proposal, Russia can clearly demonstrate its constructive approach.”

    Russia’s chief delegate Vladimir Medinsky said the point of a leaders’ meeting should be to sign an agreement, not to “discuss everything from scratch”.

    He renewed Moscow’s call for a series of short ceasefires of 24-48 hours to enable the retrieval of bodies. Ukraine says it wants an immediate and much longer ceasefire.

    The talks took place just over a week after U.S. President Donald Trump threatened heavy new sanctions on Russia and countries that buy its exports unless a peace deal was reached within 50 days.

    There was no sign of any progress towards that goal, although both sides said there was discussion of further humanitarian exchanges following a series of prisoner swaps, the latest of which took place on Wednesday.

    Medinsky said the negotiators agreed to exchange at least 1,200 more prisoners of war from each side, and Russia had offered to hand over another 3,000 Ukrainian bodies.

    He said Moscow was working through a list of 339 names of Ukrainian children that Kyiv accuses it of abducting. Russia denies that charge and says it has offered protection to children separated from their parents during the war.

    “Some of the children have already been returned back to Ukraine. Work is under way on the rest. If their legal parents, close relatives, representatives are found, these children will immediately return home,” Medinsky said.

    Umerov said Kyiv was expecting “further progress” on POWs, adding: “We continue to insist on the release of civilians, including children.” Ukrainian authorities say at least 19,000 children have been forcibly deported.

    SHORTEST TALKS YET

    Before the talks, the Kremlin had played down expectations, describing the two sides’ positions as diametrically opposed and saying no one should expect miracles.

    At 40 minutes, the meeting was even shorter than the two sides’ previous encounters on May 16 and June 2, which lasted a combined total of under three hours.

    Oleksandr Bevz, a member of the Ukrainian delegation, said Kyiv had proposed a Putin-Zelenskiy meeting in August because that would fall within the deadline set by Trump for a deal.

    Putin turned down a previous challenge from Zelenskiy to meet in person and has said he does not see him as a legitimate leader because Ukraine, which is under martial law, did not hold new elections when Zelenskiy’s five-year mandate expired last year.

    Trump has patched up relations with Zelenskiy after a public row with him at the White House in February, and has lately expressed growing frustration with Putin.

    Three sources close to the Kremlin told Reuters last week that Putin, unfazed by Trump’s ultimatum, would keep fighting in Ukraine until the West engaged on his terms for peace, and that his territorial demands may widen as Russian forces advance.

    (Reuters)

  • EU’s von der Leyen says China ties are at ‘inflection point’ at tense summit

    Source: Government of India

    Source: Government of India (4)

    European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen called for an “essential” rebalancing of trade ties with China during a tense summit on Thursday with President Xi Jinping, saying ties stood at an “inflection point”, according to a pool report.

    Expectations were low for the summit marking 50 years of diplomatic ties after weeks of escalating tension and wrangling over its format, with the duration abruptly halved to a single day at Beijing’s request.

    Von der Leyen and European Council President Antonio Costa met Xi at the start of an event set to be dominated by thorny issues ranging from trade frictions to the Ukraine war.

    “As our cooperation has deepened, so have imbalances. We have reached an inflection point,” von der Leyen told Xi during the meeting in the Great Hall of the People.

    She was referring to the EU’s trade deficit with China, which ballooned to a historic 305.8 billion euros ($360 billion) last year.

    “Rebalancing of our bilateral relation is essential … It is vital for China and Europe to acknowledge our respective concerns and come forward with real solutions.”

    However, Xi urged the EU to “make correct strategic choices” during the meeting, state broadcaster CCTV said, in a veiled criticism of Brussels’ hawkish stance on China.

    “The more severe and complex the international situation, the more China and the EU must strengthen communication, enhance mutual trust and deepen cooperation,” Xi told von der Leyen and Costa, it said.

    “Chinese and European leaders should … make correct strategic choices that meet the expectations of the people.”

    The weeks before the summit were dominated by tit-for-tat trade disputes and hawkish European rhetoric, such as a July 8 accusation by von der Leyen that China was flooding global markets as a result of its overcapacity and “enabling Russia’s war economy”.

    Shortly before the summit, however, von der Leyen struck a more conciliatory tone, describing it as an opportunity to “both advance and rebalance our relationship” in a post on X on Thursday.

    “I’m convinced there can be a mutually beneficial cooperation,” von der Leyen added.

    The two EU officials are set to meet Chinese Premier Li Qiang later. Both sides are hoping to reach a modest joint statement on climate, currently one of the only bright spots in EU-China cooperation.

    State news agency Xinhua also appeared to downplay Beijing’s rivalry with the 27-member bloc, saying China was a “critical partner” for Europe, with a range of shared interests.

    “China is a critical partner to Europe, not a systemic rival,” it said in a commentary.

    The two shared interests in trade, climate, and global governance, it said, adding, “These areas of common ground should not be eclipsed by isolated points of friction.”

    The EU defines China as a “partner, competitor and systemic rival”, which frames its strategic approach to China policy.

    At the summit, European leaders are also expected to raise topics such as electric vehicles and Chinese industrial overcapacity.

    China launched rare earth export controls in April that disrupted supply chains worldwide, leading to temporary stoppages in European automotive production lines the following month.

    But its exports of rare earth magnets to the EU surged in June by 245% from May, to stand at 1,364 metric tons, though that was still 35% lower than the year-earlier figure, customs data showed.

    The EU is likely to seal a trade deal with the United States for a broad tariff of 15% on its exports after intense negotiations, avoiding a harsher 30% figure threatened by President Donald Trump.

    (Reuters)

  • Israeli strike kills hungry Gaza family in their sleep

    Source: Government of India

    Source: Government of India (4)

    The Al-Shaer family went to bed hungry at their home in Gaza City. An Israeli airstrike killed them in their sleep.

    The family – freelance journalist Wala al-Jaabari, her husband and their five children – were among more than 100 people killed in 24 hours of Israeli strikes or gunfire, according to health officials.

    Their corpses lay in white shrouds outside their bombed home on Wednesday with their names scribbled in pen. Blood seeped through the shrouds as they lay there, staining them red.

    “This is my cousin. He was 10. We dug them out of the rubble,” Amr al-Shaer, holding one of the bodies after retrieving it.

    Iman al-Shaer, another relative who lives nearby, said the family hadn’t eaten anything before the bombs came down. “The children slept without food,” he said.

    The Israeli military did not immediately comment on the strike at the family’s home, but said its air force had struck 120 targets throughout Gaza in the past day, including “terrorist cells, military structures, tunnels, booby-trapped structures, and additional terrorist infrastructure sites”.

    Relatives said some neighbours were spared only because they had been out searching for food at the time of the strike.

    Ten more Palestinians died overnight from starvation, the Gaza health ministry said, bringing the total number of people who have starved to death to 111, most of them in recent weeks as a wave of hunger crashes on the Palestinian enclave.

    The World Health Organization said on Wednesday 21 children under the age of five were among those who died of malnutrition so far this year. It said it had been unable to deliver any food for nearly 80 days between March and May and that a resumption of food deliveries was still far below what is needed.

    In a statement on Wednesday, 111 organisations, including Mercy Corps, the Norwegian Refugee Council and Refugees International, said mass starvation was spreading even as tons of food, clean water and medical supplies sit untouched just outside Gaza, where aid groups are blocked from accessing them.

    Israel, which cut off all supplies to Gaza from the start of March and reopened it with new restrictions in May, says it is committed to allowing in aid but must control it to prevent it from being diverted by militants. It says it has let enough food into Gaza during the war and blames Hamas for the suffering of Gaza’s 2.2 million people.

    Israel has also accused the United Nations of failing to act in a timely fashion, saying 700 truckloads of aid are idling inside Gaza. “It is time for them to pick it up and stop blaming Israel for the bottlenecks which are occurring,” Israeli government spokesman David Mercer said on Wednesday.

    The United Nations and aid groups trying to deliver food to Gaza say Israel, which controls everything that comes in and out, is choking delivery, and Israeli troops have shot hundreds of Palestinians dead close to aid collection points since May.

    “We have a minimum set of requirements to be able to operate inside Gaza,” Ross Smith, the director of emergencies at the U.N. World Food Programme, told Reuters. “One of the most important things I want to emphasize is that we need to have no armed actors near our distribution points, near our convoys.”

    Israel’s U.N. Ambassador Danny Danon told the Security Council on Wednesday that Israel will now grant only one-month visas to international staff from the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs.

    FALTERING PEACE TALKS

    The war between Israel and Hamas has been raging for nearly two years since Hamas killed some 1,200 Israelis and took 251 hostages from southern Israel in the deadliest attack in Israel’s history.

    Israel has since killed nearly 60,000 Palestinians in Gaza, decimated Hamas as a military force, reduced most of the territory to ruins and forced nearly the entire population to flee their homes multiple times.

    U.S. Middle East peace envoy Steve Witkoff is expected to hold new ceasefire talks, travelling to Europe this week for meetings on the Gaza war and a range of other issues, a U.S. official said on Tuesday.

    A Palestinian official close to the Gaza ceasefire talks and the mediation efforts told Reuters on Wednesday that Hamas had handed its response on the ceasefire proposal to mediators, declining to elaborate further.

    Talks on a proposal for a 60-day ceasefire between Israel and Hamas, which would include the release of more of the 50 hostages still being held in Gaza, are being mediated by Qatar and Egypt with Washington’s backing.

    Successive rounds of negotiations have achieved no breakthrough since the collapse of a ceasefire in March.

    Israel’s President Isaac Herzog told soldiers during a visit to Gaza on Wednesday that “intensive negotiations” about returning the hostages held there were underway and he hoped that they would soon “hear good news”, according to a statement.

    A senior Palestinian official earlier told Reuters Hamas might give mediators a response to the latest proposals in Doha later on Wednesday, on the condition that amendments be made to two major sticking points: details on an Israeli military withdrawal, and on how to distribute aid during a truce.

    Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s cabinet includes far-right parties that oppose any agreement that ends without the total destruction of Hamas.

    “The second I spot weakness in the prime minister and if I come to think, heaven forbid, that this is about to end with us surrendering instead of with Hamas’s absolute surrender, I won’t remain (in the government) for even a single day,” Finance Minister Belalel Smotrich told Army Radio.

    (Reuters)

  • Thailand F-16 jet deployed against Cambodian forces as border clash escalates

    Source: Government of India

    Source: Government of India (4)

    A Thai F-16 fighter jet bombed targets in Cambodia on Thursday, both sides said, as weeks of tension over a border dispute escalated into clashes that have killed at least two civilians.

    Of the six F-16 fighter jets that Thailand readied to deploy along the disputed border, one of the aircraft fired into Cambodia and destroyed a military target, the Thai army said. Both countries accused each other of starting the clash early on Thursday.

    “We have used air power against military targets as planned,” Thai army deputy spokesperson Richa Suksuwanon told reporters. Thailand also closed its border with Cambodia.

    Cambodia’s defence ministry said the jets dropped two bombs on a road, and that it “strongly condemns the reckless and brutal military aggression of the Kingdom of Thailand against the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Cambodia”.

    The skirmishes came after Thailand recalled its ambassador to Cambodia late on Wednesday and said it would expel Cambodia’s envoy in Bangkok, after a second Thai soldier in the space of a week lost a limb to a landmine that Bangkok alleged had been laid recently in the disputed area.

    Thai residents in the Surin border province fled to shelters built of concrete and fortified with sandbags and car tires as the two countries exchanged fire.

    “How many rounds have been fired? It’s countless,” an unidentified woman told the Thai Public Broadcasting Service (TPBS) while hiding in the shelter with gunfire and explosions heard intermittently in the background.

    For more than a century, Thailand and Cambodia have contested sovereignty at various undemarcated points along their 817 km (508 miles) land border, which has led to skirmishes over several years and at least a dozen deaths, including during a weeklong exchange of artillery in 2011.

    Tensions were reignited in May following the killing of a Cambodian soldier during a brief exchange of gunfire, which escalated into a full-blown diplomatic crisis and now has triggered armed clashes.

    LANDMINES

    The clashes began early on Thursday near the disputed Ta Moan Thom temple along the eastern border between Cambodia and Thailand, around 360 km from the Thai capital Bangkok.

    “Artillery shell fell on people’s homes,” Sutthirot Charoenthanasak, district chief of Kabcheing in Surin province, told Reuters, describing the firing by the Cambodian side.

    “Two people have died,” he said, adding that district authorities had evacuated 40,000 civilians from 86 villages near the border to safer locations.

    Thailand’s military said Cambodia deployed a surveillance drone before sending troops with heavy weapons to an area near the temple.

    Cambodian troops opened fire and two Thai soldiers were wounded, a Thai army spokesperson said, adding Cambodia had used multiple weapons, including rocket launchers.

    A spokesperson for Cambodia’s defence ministry, however, said there had been an unprovoked incursion by Thai troops and Cambodian forces had responded in self-defence.

    Thailand’s acting Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai said the situation was delicate.

    “We have to be careful,” he told reporters. “We will follow international law.”

    An attempt by Thai premier Paetongtarn Shinawatra to resolve the recent tensions via a call with Cambodia’s influential former Prime Minister Hun Sen, the contents of which were leaked, kicked off a political storm in Thailand, leading to her suspension by a court.

    Hun Sen said in a Facebook post that two Cambodian provinces had come under shelling from the Thai military.

    Thailand this week accused Cambodia of placing landmines in a disputed area that injured three soldiers. Phnom Penh denied the claim and said the soldiers had veered off agreed routes and triggered a mine left behind from decades of war.

    Cambodia has many landmines left over from its civil war decades ago, numbering in the millions according to de-mining groups.

    But Thailand maintains landmines have been placed at the border area recently, which Cambodia has described as baseless allegations.

    (Reuters) 

  • Microsoft says some SharePoint server hackers now using ransomware

    Source: Government of India

    Source: Government of India (4)

    A cyber-espionage campaign centered on vulnerable versions of Microsoft‘s server software now involves the deployment of ransomware, Microsoft said in a late Wednesday blog post.

    In the post, citing “expanded analysis and threat intelligence,” Microsoft said a group it dubs “Storm-2603” is using the vulnerability to seed the ransomware, which typically works by paralyzing victims’ networks until a digital currency payment is made.

    The disclosure marks a potential escalation in the campaign, which has already hit at least 400 victims, according to Netherlands-based cybersecurity firm Eye Security. Unlike typical state-backed hacker campaigns, which are aimed at stealing data, ransomware can cause widespread disruption depending on where it lands.

    The figure of 400 victims represents a sharp rise from the 100 organizations cataloged over the weekend. Eye Security says the figure is likely an undercount.

    “There are many more, because not all attack vectors have left artifacts that we could scan for,” said Vaisha Bernard, the chief hacker for Eye Security, which was among the first organizations to flag the breaches.

    The details of most of the victim organizations have not yet been fully disclosed, but on Wednesday a representative for the National Institutes of Health confirmed that one of the organization’s servers had been compromised.

    “Additional servers were isolated as a precaution,” he said. The news of the compromise was first reported by the Washington Post.

    Other outlets said the hacking campaign had breached an even broader range of U.S. agencies. NextGov, citing multiple people familiar with the matter, reported the Department of Homeland Security had been hit, along with more than five to 12 other agencies.

    Politico, which cited two U.S. officials, said multiple agencies were believed to have been breached.

    DHS’ cyberdefense arm, CISA, did not immediately return a message seeking comment on the reports. Microsoft did not immediately return a message seeking further details on the ransomware angle of the hacking or the reported government victims.

    The spy campaign began after Microsoft failed to fully patch a security hole in its SharePoint server software, kicking off a scramble to fix the vulnerability when it was discovered.

    Microsoft and its tech rival, Google-owner Alphabet, have both said Chinese hackers are among those taking advantage of the flaw. Beijing has denied the claim.

    -Reuters

  • U’khand panchayat polls: 1st phase of voting begins, CM Dhami to cast vote in Khatima

    Source: Government of India

    Source: Government of India (4)

    Uttarakhand Chief Minister Pushkar Singh Dhami on Thursday arrived in Khatima to cast his vote as the first phase of the three-tier panchayat elections commenced across the state.

    He reached Khatima via helicopter and landed at the helipad of Saraf Public School. After this, he headed to the Nagla Tarai Primary School polling booth to exercise his right to vote.

    The voting, being held in two phases across 12 districts — excluding Haridwar — is set to decide thousands of local representatives.

    According to the notification issued by the Uttarakhand State Election Commission, a total of 2,247 candidates are in the fray for 948 member Gram Panchayat seats, while 9,731 candidates are contesting for 3,393 Pradhan Gram Panchayat posts.

    Additionally, 4,980 candidates are contesting for 1,507 Area Panchayat member positions and 871 for 201 District Panchayat member posts.

    An estimated 26 lakh voters were eligible to cast their votes in this first phase. Despite persistent monsoon showers, voters turned up in large numbers, forming long queues outside polling booths in various parts of the state.

    A total of 1,240 polling personnel were deployed to ensure the smooth conduct of elections, while tight security arrangements were put in place to maintain law and order throughout the process.

    Earlier in the day, CM Dhami took to X to appeal to voters, saying, “Today, the first phase of voting for the three-tier panchayat elections is taking place. I appeal to all the divine people of the state to reach the polling stations in large numbers and exercise their voting rights.”

    “With your vote, choose capable, aware, and dedicated representatives who will strongly raise your voice and strengthen the foundation of rural development. Your single vote is an important step towards a robust Panchayati Raj system,” he added.

    The second phase of voting is scheduled for July 28, and counting of votes will take place on July 31.

    (IANS)

  • U’khand panchayat polls: 1st phase of voting begins, CM Dhami to cast vote in Khatima

    Source: Government of India

    Source: Government of India (4)

    Uttarakhand Chief Minister Pushkar Singh Dhami on Thursday arrived in Khatima to cast his vote as the first phase of the three-tier panchayat elections commenced across the state.

    He reached Khatima via helicopter and landed at the helipad of Saraf Public School. After this, he headed to the Nagla Tarai Primary School polling booth to exercise his right to vote.

    The voting, being held in two phases across 12 districts — excluding Haridwar — is set to decide thousands of local representatives.

    According to the notification issued by the Uttarakhand State Election Commission, a total of 2,247 candidates are in the fray for 948 member Gram Panchayat seats, while 9,731 candidates are contesting for 3,393 Pradhan Gram Panchayat posts.

    Additionally, 4,980 candidates are contesting for 1,507 Area Panchayat member positions and 871 for 201 District Panchayat member posts.

    An estimated 26 lakh voters were eligible to cast their votes in this first phase. Despite persistent monsoon showers, voters turned up in large numbers, forming long queues outside polling booths in various parts of the state.

    A total of 1,240 polling personnel were deployed to ensure the smooth conduct of elections, while tight security arrangements were put in place to maintain law and order throughout the process.

    Earlier in the day, CM Dhami took to X to appeal to voters, saying, “Today, the first phase of voting for the three-tier panchayat elections is taking place. I appeal to all the divine people of the state to reach the polling stations in large numbers and exercise their voting rights.”

    “With your vote, choose capable, aware, and dedicated representatives who will strongly raise your voice and strengthen the foundation of rural development. Your single vote is an important step towards a robust Panchayati Raj system,” he added.

    The second phase of voting is scheduled for July 28, and counting of votes will take place on July 31.

    (IANS)

  • Markets open flat; IT, midcap stocks under pressure amid mixed global cues

    Source: Government of India

    Source: Government of India (4)

    The Indian stock market opened flat on Thursday as IT companies came under selling pressure amid mixed global cues.

    At 9:28 a.m., the Sensex slipped 110 points or 0.13 per cent to 82,615, and the Nifty declined 13 points or 0.05 per cent to 25,206.

    Sectorally, the Nifty IT index underperformed with a loss of 1.17 per cent. All other sectors showed marginal dips or moderate gains. Bank stocks registered moderate losses of up to 0.20 per cent.

    Midcap and smallcap stocks also faced selling pressure. The Nifty Midcap 100 index was down 0.39 per cent at 59,148, while the Nifty Smallcap 100 index declined 0.07 per cent to 18,879.

    In the Nifty pack, Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories led the gainers with a 3.07 per cent rise, followed by Tata Motors at 1.51 per cent. Tata Consumer Products, Eicher Motors, JSW Steel, and Tata Steel were also among the top gainers. Trent, Kotak Mahindra Bank, and Bajaj Finance were among the early losers.

    “Market sentiment remains cautiously optimistic amid heightened volatility and mixed global cues. Nifty 50’s rebound highlights buyer strength at lower levels. A sustained move above 25,250 could potentially open the path toward the 25,330 mark. On the downside, immediate support is placed at 25,125, followed by 25,000,” said Hardik Matalia of Choice Equity Broking Private Limited.

    The Bank Nifty outperformed the broader index, rising 454 points and forming a bullish candlestick, indicating renewed buying interest, he added.

    Both Asian and U.S. indices posted strong overnight gains, lending a positive backdrop for Indian markets at the open.

    In the U.S., the Dow Jones Industrial Average advanced 1.14 per cent, the Nasdaq rose 0.61 per cent, and the S&P 500 added 0.78 per cent.

    According to analysts, the U.S. striking trade deals with various countries is gradually easing concerns over tariff wars. Strong corporate earnings in the U.S. are also providing fundamental support to the market.

    In Asian markets, the Nikkei 225 continued its strong rally for the second consecutive day, gaining 1.97 per cent, while Indonesia’s Jakarta Composite climbed 1.70 per cent. Hong Kong, Shanghai, and Seoul were also trading in the green.

    On July 23, foreign institutional investors (FIIs) were net sellers for the fifth consecutive session, offloading stocks worth Rs 4,209 crore. In contrast, domestic institutional investors (DIIs) remained strong buyers for the 12th straight day, purchasing shares worth Rs 4,358 crore.

    IANS

  • Markets open flat; IT, midcap stocks under pressure amid mixed global cues

    Source: Government of India

    Source: Government of India (4)

    The Indian stock market opened flat on Thursday as IT companies came under selling pressure amid mixed global cues.

    At 9:28 a.m., the Sensex slipped 110 points or 0.13 per cent to 82,615, and the Nifty declined 13 points or 0.05 per cent to 25,206.

    Sectorally, the Nifty IT index underperformed with a loss of 1.17 per cent. All other sectors showed marginal dips or moderate gains. Bank stocks registered moderate losses of up to 0.20 per cent.

    Midcap and smallcap stocks also faced selling pressure. The Nifty Midcap 100 index was down 0.39 per cent at 59,148, while the Nifty Smallcap 100 index declined 0.07 per cent to 18,879.

    In the Nifty pack, Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories led the gainers with a 3.07 per cent rise, followed by Tata Motors at 1.51 per cent. Tata Consumer Products, Eicher Motors, JSW Steel, and Tata Steel were also among the top gainers. Trent, Kotak Mahindra Bank, and Bajaj Finance were among the early losers.

    “Market sentiment remains cautiously optimistic amid heightened volatility and mixed global cues. Nifty 50’s rebound highlights buyer strength at lower levels. A sustained move above 25,250 could potentially open the path toward the 25,330 mark. On the downside, immediate support is placed at 25,125, followed by 25,000,” said Hardik Matalia of Choice Equity Broking Private Limited.

    The Bank Nifty outperformed the broader index, rising 454 points and forming a bullish candlestick, indicating renewed buying interest, he added.

    Both Asian and U.S. indices posted strong overnight gains, lending a positive backdrop for Indian markets at the open.

    In the U.S., the Dow Jones Industrial Average advanced 1.14 per cent, the Nasdaq rose 0.61 per cent, and the S&P 500 added 0.78 per cent.

    According to analysts, the U.S. striking trade deals with various countries is gradually easing concerns over tariff wars. Strong corporate earnings in the U.S. are also providing fundamental support to the market.

    In Asian markets, the Nikkei 225 continued its strong rally for the second consecutive day, gaining 1.97 per cent, while Indonesia’s Jakarta Composite climbed 1.70 per cent. Hong Kong, Shanghai, and Seoul were also trading in the green.

    On July 23, foreign institutional investors (FIIs) were net sellers for the fifth consecutive session, offloading stocks worth Rs 4,209 crore. In contrast, domestic institutional investors (DIIs) remained strong buyers for the 12th straight day, purchasing shares worth Rs 4,358 crore.

    IANS

  • UAE Central Bank mandates phase-out of SMS and email OTP authentication by March 2026

    Source: Government of India

    Source: Government of India (4)

    The Central Bank of the United Arab Emirates (CBUAE) has issued a directive requiring all financial institutions to eliminate SMS and email-based one-time password (OTP) authentication for customer transactions by March 31, 2026. This move, aimed at bolstering digital banking security, will affect banks, finance companies, exchange houses, insurers, and payment service providers across the UAE, marking a significant shift toward more secure, risk-based authentication technologies.

    Traditional OTP methods, delivered via SMS or email, are increasingly vulnerable to phishing, SIM swapping, and SS7 protocol exploits. To counter these threats, the CBUAE is mandating the adoption of advanced authentication methods, such as Emirates Face Recognition, biometric verification, and mobile-based soft tokens.

    Starting July 25, 2025, UAE banks will begin transitioning customers to app-based authentication for all domestic and international financial transactions. Leading institutions like Emirates NBD, ADIB, and FAB have already adopted biometric and in-app solutions for most online banking activities. Customers will need to enable app-based verification features to authorize transactions, replacing the reliance on SMS or email OTPs. The CBUAE has set a phased implementation, with full compliance required by March 2026.

    The UAE’s move aligns with global trends, as countries like Singapore and Malaysia phase out SMS-based OTPs due to similar security concerns. The Monetary Authority of Singapore, for instance, mandated a similar shift in 2024, citing rising phishing scams. The CBUAE’s directive is part of its broader Financial Infrastructure Transformation (FIT) Programme, which includes initiatives like the planned launch of a retail central bank digital currency (CBDC), the digital dirham, in late 2025.

  • MIL-OSI Economics: Result of the Overnight Variable Rate Repo (VRR) auction held on July 24, 2025

    Source: Reserve Bank of India

    Tenor 1-day
    Notified Amount (in ₹ crore) 50,000
    Total amount of bids received (in ₹ crore) 1,421
    Amount allotted (in ₹ crore) 1,421
    Cut off Rate (%) 5.51
    Weighted Average Rate (%) 5.53
    Partial Allotment Percentage of bids received at cut off rate (%) NA

    Ajit Prasad          
    Deputy General Manager
    (Communications)    

    Press Release: 2025-2026/775

    MIL OSI Economics –

  • MIL-OSI Banking: Underwriting Auction for sale of Government Securities for ₹36,000 crore on July 25, 2025

    Source: Reserve Bank of India

    Government of India has announced the sale (re-issue) of Government Securities, as detailed below, through auctions to be held on July 25, 2025 (Friday).

    As per the extant scheme of underwriting commitment notified on November 14, 2007, the amounts of Minimum Underwriting Commitment (MUC) and the minimum bidding commitment under Additional Competitive Underwriting (ACU) auction, applicable to each Primary Dealer (PD), are as under:

    (₹ crore)
    Security Notified Amount MUC amount per PD Minimum bidding commitment per PD under ACU auction
    5.91% GS 2028 6,000 143 143
    6.33% GS 2035 30,000 715 715

    The underwriting auction will be conducted through multiple price-based method on July 25, 2025 (Friday). PDs may submit their bids for ACU auction electronically through Core Banking Solution (E-Kuber) System between 09:00 A.M. and 09:30 A.M. on the day of underwriting auction.

    The underwriting commission will be credited to the current account of the respective PDs with RBI on the day of issue of securities.

    Ajit Prasad          
    Deputy General Manager
    (Communications)    

    Press Release: 2025-2026/774

    MIL OSI Global Banks –

  • MIL-OSI USA: The Data Center Next Door: As Trump Eviscerates Guardrails, Senator Markey Hosts Roundtable Discussion on How AI Data Centers Can Harm Environment, Increase Costs to Households, and Threaten Public Health

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Massachusetts Ed Markey

    View Storybook (PDF)

    Washington (July 23, 2025) – Senator Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.), a co-chair of the Environmental Justice Caucus and a member of the Environment and Public Works Committee and Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee, today hosted a virtual roundtable discussion titled “The Data Center Next Door: Hidden Costs and Harms of Artificial Intelligence and Cryptomining.” Senator Markey was joined by Congressman Steve Cohen (TN-09), frontline advocates, and allies to discuss the effects of rapid data center development on climate and communities, including impacts on local air quality, water, grid reliability, health, and utility bills. Speakers highlighted how communities and allied organizations across the country are working to curb harms from data center build-out and how policymakers can more proactively address unsustainable data center development.

    Today, Senator Markey also released a new storybook highlighting the personal experiences of individuals living near data center infrastructure.

    “I have heard from people across the country whose stories make clear: unregulated, uncontrolled data center development is sucking our communities dry. Our environment doesn’t have to be a sacrificial lamb on the altar of innovation. We can have green growth—but not if we have Trump’s AI Inaction Plan as our Big Tech Bible. Lawmakers at all levels of government can and must ensure the Trump administration’s no-holds-barred approach to data center construction does not come at the cost of our health and welfare,” said Senator Markey. “We are not truly moving forward if we harm and leave people behind in the process. We owe it to our neighbors, near and far, to address these impacts at the federal level before we see a race to the bottom—one that could even disadvantage states and towns that try to do things right.”

    “The heart of my district is seeing the environmental impacts of Artificial Intelligence (AI) first-hand, with the world’s biggest supercomputer beginning operations last year. It requires one million gallons of water each day to cool its components and uses the same amount of energy as all 250,000 households in Memphis combined. The continued development of AI will have a drastic effect on energy and water costs and consumption, and our environment as a whole,” said Congressman Cohen.

    “Bitcoin mining is the most energy and water-intensive technology ever created. As long as the bitcoin mining algorithm is operating at scale, it is impossible to make the transition to a resilient, equitable, affordable, and renewable grid,” said Jackie Sawicky, member of the National Coalition Against Cryptomining (NCAC).

    “Families across America are struggling to afford their soaring electric bills as a result of energy-guzzling AI data centers. We cannot afford to let AI fuel a new fossil fuel boom that raises our bills and destroys our environment,” said Ben Inskeep, Program Director at Citizens Action Coalition of Indiana.

    “West Virginia has long borne the brunt of powering our country via the extraction of our natural resources. This legacy and continued pollution from fossil fuel industries worsened health disparities, increased our utility bills, and poisoned our air and water. The rapid growth of artificial intelligence development and the numerous proposals of fossil fuel powered data centers in our region simply carries on that toxic tradition of resource extraction, corporate exploitation, and harmful pollution for West Virginians,” said Morgan King, Climate and Energy Program Manager at West Virginia Citizen Action Group.

    “What’s happening in Virginia is unsustainable and the desire to go even faster is irresponsible. The impacts are too great and the risks are too high, we must slow down and put better guardrails in place,” said Julie Bolthouse, AICP, Director of Land Use at Piedmont Environmental Council.

    “Over the last year, xAI installed and operated dozens of unpermitted methane gas turbines at its Memphis data center, essentially building a power plant without any public oversight or input from nearby communities. These turbines pump out smog-forming pollution and harmful chemicals like formaldehyde and are located near predominantly Black communities that are already overburdened with a long history of environmental injustice. Families in South Memphis deserve transparency and clean air,” said Amanda Garcia, senior attorney in the Tennessee office of the Southern Environmental Law Center.

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • India, China review border situation in 34th WMCC meet, plan next round of talks

    Source: Government of India

    Source: Government of India (4)

    India and China on Wednesday held the 34th meeting of the Working Mechanism for Consultation and Coordination (WMCC) on border affairs in New Delhi, where both sides reviewed the situation along the Line of Actual Control (LAC) and discussed steps to maintain peace and stability in the border areas.

    The Indian delegation was led by Gourangalal Das, Joint Secretary (East Asia), while the Chinese side was headed by Hong Liang, Director General of the Boundary and Oceanic Affairs Department in China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

    The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) said in a statement that the two sides took note of the general prevalence of peace and tranquillity in the border areas and acknowledged the gradual improvement in bilateral ties.

    “They agreed to maintain regular diplomatic and military contacts through established mechanisms on the issues related to the India-China border,” the MEA said.

    The delegations also discussed measures previously explored during the 23rd round of Special Representatives (SR) talks and the 33rd WMCC meeting to further strengthen border management and avoid friction.

    As part of the confidence-building process, the two sides are also preparing for the next round of SR-level talks on the boundary question, which is expected to be held in India later this year.

    During his visit, the head of the Chinese delegation, Hong Liang, also called on the Indian Foreign Secretary, signalling continued diplomatic engagement at multiple levels.

    The WMCC was set up in 2012 as an institutional mechanism for consultation and coordination on India-China border affairs, and to maintain peace along the LAC through regular dialogue.

  • Bihar Electoral Roll Update: 98% coverage achieved as first phase of special revision nears completion

    Source: Government of India

    Source: Government of India (4)

    The first phase of the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of the Bihar Electoral Roll, which began on June 24, is nearing completion, with an impressive 98.01% coverage of electors across the state. The Election Commission of India (ECI) confirmed the progress on Tuesday, noting that the revision is aimed at ensuring no eligible voter is excluded and no ineligible person remains on the rolls.

    According to ECI, on July 23, more than 7.17 crore electors’ enumeration forms (90.89%) have been received and digitised. The data collected so far has revealed that approximately 20 lakh electors have been reported as deceased, 28 lakh have permanently migrated, and 7 lakh individuals are enrolled at multiple locations. Additionally, 1 lakh electors have been found to be untraceable, while forms from 15 lakh electors have not yet been returned.

    In a significant step toward electoral transparency, on July 20, the Election Commission shared lists of potentially incorrectly included electors and those who failed to submit their enumeration forms with 1.5 lakh Booth Level Agents (BLAs). These BLAs were nominated by district-level leaders of 12 major political parties in Bihar.

    The Commission has also streamlined the submission process for temporarily migrated electors from Bihar who have not registered elsewhere. These individuals can submit their enumeration forms via the ECI’s online portal (https://electors.eci.gov.in), the ECINet mobile app, or by sending signed printed forms to their Booth Level Officers (BLOs) through a family member or via WhatsApp.

    Electors who have submitted their forms can track the status on the ECI website and have been notified via SMS, provided they shared their mobile numbers in the forms.

    The Draft Electoral Roll will be published on August 1, 2025, marking the end of the first phase. If errors are found, electors or political parties may file objections regarding wrongly included names with the Electoral Registration Officer (ERO) or Assistant Electoral Registration Officer (AERO) of their constituency. Likewise, eligible individuals who are missing from the roll can file claims for inclusion by September 1, 2025.

  • Over 3.42 pilgrims had ‘Darshan’ in 21 days, Amarnath Yatra to cross officially expected 3.5-lakh mark today

    Source: Government of India

    Source: Government of India (4)

    Since this year’s Amarnath Yatra started on July 3, more than 3.42 lakh yatris have had ‘darshan’ so far while a fresh batch of 3,500 pilgrims started their journey on Thursday from Jammu towards the two base camps, officials said.

    Officials said that more than 3.42 lakh yatris have performed the ongoing Amarnath Yatra during the last 21 days as the huge rush of pilgrims continues unabated.

    “The officially expected figure of 3.50 lakh yatris performing the Yatra this year is likely to be crossed on Thursday, while 17 days are still left for the conclusion of this year’s Yatra.”

    “The Yatra has been going on peacefully, smoothly and this has encouraged the devotees to come in record numbers. As more than 3.42 lakh have had darshan in the last 21 days, we had another batch of 3,500 yatris, who left the Bhagwati Nagar Yatri Niwas in Jammu for the Valley on Thursday.”

    “Of these, the first escorted convoy of 45 vehicles carrying 832 yatris left for the Baltal base camp at 3:25 a.m. while the second convoy of 95 vehicles carrying 2,668 yatris to the Pahalgam base camp left at 4:01 a.m.,” officials said.

    The Bhumi Pujan of ‘Chhari Mubarak’ (Lord Shiva’s Holy Mace) was performed at Pahalgam on July 10. The Chhari Mubarak was then taken back to its seat at the Dashnami Akhara building.

    It will start its final journey towards the cave shrine from Dashnami Akhara temple in Srinagar on August 4 and will reach the holy cave shrine on August 9, marking the official conclusion of the Yatra.

    Authorities have made extensive multi-tier security arrangements for this year’s Amarnath Yatra, as it takes place after the cowardly attack of April 22 in which Pakistan-backed terrorists killed 26 civilians after segregating them based on faith in the Baisaran meadow of Pahalgam.

    Additional 180 companies of Central Armed Police Forces have been brought in to augment the existing strength of the Army, BSF, CRPF, SSB and the local police.

    The Army has deployed more than 8,000 special commandos to secure the passage of the pilgrims this year.

    The Yatra started on July 3 and will end after 38 days on August 9, coinciding with Shravan Purnima and Raksha Bandhan.

    Yatris approach the holy cave shrine situated ,888 metres above sea level in the Kashmir Himalayas either from the traditional Pahalgam route or the shorter Baltal route.

    Those using the Pahalgam route pass through Chandanwari, Sheshnag and Panchtarni to reach the cave shrine, covering a distance of 46 km on foot.

    This trek takes a pilgrim four days to get to the cave shrine.

    Those using the shorter Baltal route have to trek 14 km to reach the cave shrine and return to the base camp the same day after having darshan.

    No helicopter services are available to yatris this year due to security reasons.

    The cave shrine houses an ice stalagmite structure that wanes and waxes with the phases of the moon.

    Devotees believe that the ice stalagmite structure symbolises the mythical powers of Lord Shiva.

    (IANS)

  • From Gujarat to global: How PM Modi’s diaspora diplomacy took root in the UK

    Source: Government of India

    Source: Government of India (4)

    As Prime Minister Narendra Modi arrived in London on Wednesday, he was greeted by thunderous chants of “Modi Modi”, “Bharat Mata ki Jai”, and “Vande Mataram” from the Indian community — an emphatic reminder of a diplomatic tradition he initiated decades ago, long before rising to India’s highest political office.

    This growing emotional and strategic connect with the Indian diaspora has become a cornerstone of India’s foreign policy under PM Modi, especially during his second term.

    The foundations of this approach were laid as early as 1993, when Narendra Modi — then BJP’s General Secretary in Gujarat and an emerging national figure — made an impromptu stop in the UK on his return from the United States. Although the visit was unplanned and brief, Modi ensured he connected with the Indian diaspora in the UK. He visited media hubs like Sunrise Radio and the Gujarati newspaper Naya Padkar, interacted with families in Croydon and Hastings, engaged in informal conversations, rode the London Underground, and exchanged ideas with everyday Indians living in Britain.

    “The seeds planted then would quietly nourish India’s diaspora diplomacy for decades to come,” the Modi Archive said in a post on X, while sharing a timeline of the Prime Minister’s engagements in the UK.

    By 1999, when Modi had become a key national figure and the BJP’s global voice, he returned to the UK for a five-day visit in October, shortly after the BJP’s sweeping national electoral victory. Then serving as BJP’s National General Secretary, Modi had just delivered a stellar performance in Gujarat — winning 20 out of 26 Lok Sabha seats and expanding the party’s grassroots presence from 1,000 to over 16,000 village units between 1985 and 1995. This visit was highlighted by a landmark event at the Swaminarayan School in Neasden, organised by the Overseas Friends of BJP (UK). Despite a cold drizzle, the hall was packed.

    Notable attendees included Lord Navnit Dholakia, MP Barry Gardiner (Chairman of Labour Friends of India), and C.B. Patel, editor of Gujarat Samachar.

    “BJP stands for nationalism and patriotism,” Narendra Modi was quoted as saying by the Modi Archive.

    During this visit, he expanded on India’s democratic traditions, the NDA’s policy vision, and paid homage to Gandhian ideals — illustrating the BJP’s ideological clarity and moral purpose. He framed the BJP not just as a political force, but as a cultural and civilizational movement rooted in tradition, religion, modernity, and democracy. He further asserted that India’s democratic ethos is admired across the world.

    In addition, Modi was honoured by the Lohana Mahajan community, where he commended overseas Indians for serving as authentic ambassadors of Indian civilisation. He also paid a visit to 10 Downing Street during the trip.

    Modi’s emphasis on global awareness continued during another visit to the UK in 2000. In September that year, he stopped in London en route to the World Hindu Conference in the Caribbean and the UN Peace Summit in the US. At the time, he was about to assume the influential position of BJP General Secretary (Organisation), a role only two others had held since the Jana Sangh era.

    During this short visit, Modi met British Deputy Prime Minister John Prescott and engaged in serious discussions on political stability in Asia, India’s regional situation, and the growing threat of international terrorism. He also met with members of the Overseas Friends of BJP and held teleconferences with C.B. Patel, updating them on the state of affairs in Gujarat and national security efforts in Jammu and Kashmir.

    “Terrorism is an evil against humanity — whether in India, the Middle East, or Northern Ireland,” Modi said.

    It was a prescient warning that came a full year before the 9/11 attacks, at a time when much of the world had yet to perceive terrorism as a shared global menace.

    In August 2003, two years after the devastating Bhuj earthquake in Gujarat, Modi returned to the UK as Chief Minister of Gujarat.

    The purpose was to thank members of the Indian diaspora, many of whom had mobilised support, resources, and aid for the affected people.

    “You are all the real friends of Gujarat, and I have come to reciprocate the loyalty. We have slept in the street of death and today I have come to repay a debt of friendship to those who helped us in our hour of need,” Modi said, addressing thousands at the packed Wembley Conference Centre.

    He praised the diaspora not just for their financial contributions but for their deep emotional ties with India, calling them “the true friends of Gujarat”.

    During this visit, he also inaugurated the Shakti Hall at the Gujarat Samachar and Asian Voice offices. True to his style, he spoke not just of the past, but also of the future.

    In a speech still fondly remembered by the editors of Asian Voice, Modi famously said, “IT is not Information Technology. IT is India Today. BT is not Biotechnology. It is Bharat Today. IT and IT equals IT. That means Information Technology and Indian Talent is India Tomorrow.”

    The visit also included a meeting with then Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee, who was in London at the time. Modi later met a delegation of political leaders and diaspora members on the South Bank of the River Thames, near Westminster Bridge, opposite the iconic Houses of Parliament.

    Even in 2011, when Gujarat marked its golden jubilee, he virtually brought the UK into the celebrations. He addressed a high-profile audience in Mayfair, London, through video conferencing while in Gandhinagar, stating, “The name Gujarat and development are synonymous. Gujarat is creating history.”

    The event, hosted by Friends of Gujarat, Gujarat Samachar, and Asian Voice, brought together 90 distinguished guests including British MPs, Lords, and community leaders. Among them was Lord Gulam Noon, who had a direct and lively exchange with Modi.

    He used the opportunity to share his vision for the future. He announced the construction of the Mahatma Mandir, a monumental tribute rising from the soil of 18,000 villages — and including ‘mitti’ sent by Gujaratis living abroad.

    “In this Golden Jubilee celebration, we have decided to build a Mahatma Mandir. We have collected earth from 18,000 villages in Gujarat to make this monument. We have also collected earth from abroad, especially the UK,” he said.

    The message was clear: for Narendra Modi, the diaspora has never been a passive audience.

    It has always been, and continues to be, an integral part of India’s journey — a partner in progress and a powerful force in shaping India’s global image.

    Now, as Prime Minister of India, Narendra Modi continues to acknowledge and celebrate the contributions made by overseas Indians in deepening people-to-people ties and in promoting India’s image and influence across the globe.

    IANS