Source: Government of India
Source: Government of India (4)
Source: Government of India
Source: Government of India (4)
Source: Frontex
In April 2025, Frontex, the European Border and Coast Guard Agency, demonstrated its broad commitment to keeping Europe’s borders secure through a range of impactful operations and collaborations. From cracking down on smugglers in Eastern Europe to saving lives at sea in the Mediterranean, and from embracing new border technologies to strengthening partnerships across the continent, the month showcased Frontex’s dedication to a safer and more cooperative Europe. The following highlights recap how Frontex and national authorities worked hand-in-hand over the past month, underscoring a professional and proactive approach to European border management.
Bulgarian authorities and Frontex scored a victory against cross-border crime this month by stopping a haul of counterfeit goods at the Lesovo border crossing with Turkey. In a joint operation, the Bulgarian Border Police and Customs officers, supported by Frontex Standing Corps officers, intercepted two vehicles loaded with fake designer clothing and footwear. More than 1,400 garments and 900 pairs of shoes bearing logos of famous brands were seized – items that would have been worth an estimated €70,000 on the black market had they slipped through. Some illicit products even carried price tags up to €600 for a single T-shirt, a sign of how convincing the fakes appeared.
This success at the EU’s external border was a direct result of vigilant cooperation. As one Frontex officer put it, “It is not easy to tell a fake from an original when it comes to counterfeit goods. But working together with professionals every day, we have become a serious obstacle for smugglers.” The operation highlighted the excellent partnership between Frontex and the Bulgarian authorities in protecting EU consumers and legitimate businesses. The Frontex officer’s praise for his Bulgarian colleagues underscores the fruitful cooperation on the ground. The confiscated counterfeit items will now be used as evidence, preventing them from entering EU markets, while the perpetrators face legal consequences. This case sends a clear message: through close collaboration, border agencies are effectively shutting down smuggling routes for fake goods.
Another major enforcement success in April took place on the Romania–Ukraine border, where a joint team from the Romanian Border Police, Romanian Customs, and Frontex thwarted a large-scale cigarette smuggling attempt. In under an hour, officers apprehended two individuals attempting to illegally bring over 2.6 million cigarettes into the EU. The smugglers had gone to great lengths to hide their contraband, using some truly creative compartments to try to evade detection. The team’s discovery was all the more impressive given the inventive hiding places employed, including:
Thanks to the sharp eyes and expertise of the border guards, these concealments were uncovered before the illicit cargo could move further into Europe. The Frontex officer supporting the operation – known among colleagues as a veteran in fighting smuggling – played a key role in detecting the contraband. Romanian officials and Frontex supervisors alike praised the operation’s success. One colleague lauded the involved officer as “a true professional with a special and inexhaustible flair for detecting cross-border crime.” This compliment underscores the high level of skill present in such joint teams. The “hats off” accolades went to all Romanian and Frontex personnel involved, highlighting how teamwork and shared intelligence can foil even the most elaborate smuggling schemes. The seizure of 2.6 million cigarettes not only represents a financial blow to organised crime but also protects EU markets and taxpayers from the illegal tobacco trade. It stands as yet another example of effective Frontex support at EU borders, keeping illicit goods out of circulation.
As warmer spring weather set in, April saw a surge in irregular migration across the Central Mediterranean, testing the readiness and solidarity of EU border forces. Within just a few days, over 1,100 migrants had arrived on Italian shores, many taking to the sea in flimsy boats launched from North Africa. This sudden influx – more than one thousand people in a 72-hour span – put considerable strain on Italy’s reception facilities and underscored the ongoing challenges in this maritime corridor. In response, Frontex and several EU Member States mobilised swiftly to ensure lives were protected and borders monitored.
European solidarity was on full display during these rescues. Danish and Lithuanian patrol boats deployed under Frontex’s coordination helped the Italian authorities save nearly 400 people from five small, unseaworthy vessels in the central Mediterranean. Operating under Italy’s lead, the crews from Denmark and Lithuania worked tirelessly to transfer men, women, and children from overcrowded, unsafe boats to the relative safety of EU vessels. At the same time, Frontex aerial surveillance teams intensified patrol flights over the sea. Frontex aircraft spotted multiple migrant boats in distress from the air, relaying precise coordinates to rescue units. This early detection enabled timely life-saving interventions by the Italian Coast Guard and other assets, preventing potential tragedies at sea.
Over the course of three days, dozens of rescue operations were carried out by a combination of national and Frontex-deployed resources. Such joint efforts demonstrate the value of a truly integrated European approach: Member States lending support to one another via Frontex when migratory pressure spikes in a particular region. The Executive Director of Frontex noted that every person saved is a testament to the collective commitment of the EU to protect lives. While the Central Mediterranean route remains difficult and dangerous, April’s experience showed how coordinated action can meet these challenges. By pooling vessels, aircraft, and expertise from across Europe, Frontex and its partners helped ensure that a surge in crossings did not turn into a humanitarian disaster. The Agency continues to work closely with Italy and other front-line states, not only to manage irregular migration flows but also to go after the criminal networks exploiting vulnerable migrants. Saving lives at sea remains at the core of Frontex’s mission, alongside securing the EU’s external borders.
In April, Frontex achieved a significant milestone in enhancing border security technology and cooperation. Thanks to a new agreement with Cyprus, Frontex officers now have direct access to Cyprus’s national border database at crossing points. This development means that Frontex personnel deployed in support of Cypriot authorities can instantly check traveler information and other border data just as national officers do. The immediate benefits of this integration are clear, leading to:
Faster, more secure screening at airports and other entry points, reducing wait times for travelers while enhancing security through better information sharing.
By plugging into Cyprus’s databases, Frontex can help close information gaps and streamline operations on the ground. This is one of the first practical outcomes of a broader initiative to improve data-driven border management. Importantly, preparations are underway for the full rollout of Frontex’s access to the Schengen Information System (SIS) – Europe’s largest security database – which will take cooperation to the next level in the near future. Gaining SIS access will enable Frontex officers to spot persons or objects of interest (such as stolen documents or wanted individuals) across all of Europe’s borders in real time, greatly amplifying their effectiveness.
This deepening tech integration with Member States exemplifies Frontex’s push for “smart borders.” It shows how investing in modern IT solutions can make border control both faster and more secure, without compromising on thoroughness. Cypriot authorities have welcomed Frontex’s connectivity to their systems, noting that it serves as a force multiplier for national border guards. Together, Frontex and Cyprus are building a border management approach that is fast, fair, and future-ready – one that leverages the best of technology and teamwork to protect the EU’s external frontiers.
This month marked two years since the launch of the joint operation between Frontex and North Macedonia, a partnership that has significantly bolstered border security in the Western Balkans. In April 2023, North Macedonia became the first Western Balkan country to host Frontex border teams under a special status agreement, and two years on, the results of this cooperation are evident and worth celebrating. Frontex Standing Corps officers have been working side by side with North Macedonian Border Police along the country’s borders, sharing expertise and helping to manage migratory movements and security threats in the region. Together, over the past 24 months, they have achieved several important milestones in border management, including:
Joint patrols conducted along North Macedonia’s borders with neighbouring countries, enhancing surveillance and the ability to intercept irregular crossings or illicit activities. These mixed teams have increased the visibility and reach of border control, acting as a deterrent to smugglers and traffickers.
Delivery of modern equipment and technical assets to North Macedonia’s authorities. Frontex has provided patrol vehicles, document inspection devices, and other specialist tools to strengthen the country’s border infrastructure. This upgraded equipment means local border guards are better equipped to spot fake documents, hidden contraband, or unauthorised entries.
Stronger overall border protection for North Macedonia and Europe. By reinforcing a key section of the Balkan migration route, the cooperation has contributed to greater security for the entire EU external border. It has helped manage migration flows more effectively and cracked down on cross-border crime, from migrant smuggling to contraband trafficking, benefitting all Europeans.
Frontex and North Macedonia’s officials commemorated the two-year anniversary by reflecting on these successes and looking ahead to continued collaboration. The presence of European border guards in North Macedonia underscores the EU’s commitment to working with its neighbours to tackle shared challenges. It also provides invaluable experience to all the officers involved, creating a spirit of camaraderie and mutual understanding. According to Frontex’s leadership, this partnership is a model of EU–Western Balkans cooperation, showing how aligning procedures and sharing resources can lead to concrete improvements in security and border management. As the operation enters its third year, Frontex plans to maintain its support, including further training for North Macedonia’s officers and ongoing joint patrols, thereby maintaining the positive momentum. The past two years have laid a solid foundation for even closer ties and a more secure region in the future.
Frontex’s activities in April were not limited to field operations – they also extended to strategic dialogue at the highest levels. A noteworthy event took place at the Frontex Operational Headquarters in Piraeus, Greece, where Commander Georgios Pyliaros (the Frontex Field Commander in Greece) hosted a high-level meeting with Admiral José António Vizinha Mirones, the Commander of the Portuguese Maritime Police. Admiral Mirones visited the Piraeus headquarters as part of a Joint Coordination Board discussion, focusing on the current operational situation and challenges in the Eastern Mediterranean, particularly regarding migration flows affecting Greece and Cyprus.
During this visit, both leaders exchanged insights on maritime border security and reinforced their commitment to close cooperation. Commander Pyliaros expressed, on behalf of Frontex’s chain of command, sincere appreciation for Portugal’s continued contribution to Frontex-led operations. He highlighted the professionalism and dedication displayed by the Portuguese crews operating coastal patrol vessels in Greek waters. These Portuguese Maritime Police teams, deployed under Frontex, have been instrumental in joint patrols and search-and-rescue missions in the Aegean Sea, and their exemplary performance and seamless integration with Frontex units have not gone unnoticed. Admiral Mirones, for his part, conveyed gratitude for the opportunity to visit and engage with Frontex’s Greece office. He commended the collective effort being made to safeguard Europe’s maritime borders and stressed the importance of ongoing collaboration. Both officials agreed that maintaining strong partnerships – such as the one between Frontex and Portugal – is crucial in addressing migration and security challenges at sea.
The meeting concluded on a highly positive note, symbolising the unity of purpose among European border and coast guard services. In a ceremonial gesture, commemorative coins were exchanged between Frontex and the Portuguese Maritime Police, underscoring mutual respect and teamwork. This high-level maritime dialogue not only strengthened bilateral ties but also provided strategic guidance for field operations. With Portugal’s vessels and crews continuing to serve in Frontex missions, such coordination ensures that everyone is rowing in the same direction. The result is a more effective response to irregular migration by sea and a safer maritime environment for all. These talks in April set the stage for even more synchronised efforts in the months to come, reaffirming that European partners stand stronger together in protecting the EU’s external borders.
Frontex also invested in long-term security capacity this month by focusing on the fight against illicit firearms. Firearms trafficking is a growing threat to EU internal security, especially in times of war and instability when weapons can more easily find their way onto the black market. In April, within the framework of the EU’s EMPACT initiative (European Multidisciplinary Platform Against Criminal Threats), Frontex led a specialised training programme in Poland aimed at sharpening the skills of border guards in intercepting illegal arms. The training was hosted at the Polish Border Guard Academy in Kętrzyn – a centre known for advanced law enforcement training – and brought together officers from 10 EU Member States. These participants, all of them frontline border or customs officers, underwent intensive instruction on how to better detect and stop the smuggling of firearms at EU borders.
Over the course of the training, the multinational group of officers learned about concealment methods and detection techniques for firearms. Experts shared real-case examples of smugglers attempting to hide weapons and ammunition in vehicles, cargo, or personal luggage, highlighting red flags to watch for. The trainees practiced using x-ray scanners, metal detectors, and other tools to identify weapons hidden in creative ways. They also exchanged intelligence on smuggling routes and the latest trends in gun trafficking, recognising that traffickers are constantly adapting their methods. By simulating realistic scenarios, the course enabled officers to hone their decision-making under pressure – for instance, when discovering a hidden handgun during a routine vehicle inspection at a border crossing. The overarching goal was to equip frontline officers with the knowledge, tools, and confidence to intercept firearms before those weapons can reach our streets and communities.
This EMPACT-supported training in Poland is part of a broader EU effort to cut off the supply of illegal firearms that can fuel organised crime or even terrorism. By investing in people and skills, Frontex and its partners are strengthening a critical line of defence against gun trafficking. The officers who completed the course in Kętrzyn will take their enhanced expertise back to their home countries – from Scandinavia to Southern Europe – multiplying the impact. They form a network of trained specialists who can also share best practices with colleagues, thus raising overall capacity across the EU. Frontex officials highlighted that such cooperative training not only improves technical know-how but also builds trust and communication channels among European border agencies. Ultimately, this means better coordinated operations and information-sharing when it comes to stopping dangerous weapons from crossing into the EU. The training concluded with participants and instructors affirming their commitment to stay one step ahead of firearms traffickers. As new security challenges emerge, continuous professional development like this ensures that Europe’s border guards remain vigilant and prepared.
April 2025 showcased the full spectrum of Frontex’s mission – from frontline enforcement and lifesaving rescues to technological advancement and international partnership. As Europe’s external border challenges continue to evolve with the changing seasons and geopolitical context, Frontex is moving ahead with resolve. The Agency is leveraging the momentum from April’s successes to further strengthen cooperation, whether by expanding joint operations in partner countries or by welcoming more contributions from Member States. It is accelerating the adoption of modern technology and information systems to give border guards an edge in both speed and accuracy. Equally, Frontex remains committed to investing in its people – through training, leadership development, and a culture of shared expertise – recognising that a well-prepared human element is key to any high-tech solution. In the coming months, Frontex will continue to stand shoulder-to-shoulder with EU countries at their borders, upholding European values of security and solidarity. By building on the foundations laid in April, the European Border and Coast Guard will be even better equipped to tackle whatever challenges the future holds – protecting the EU’s borders and the people who depend on them, with professionalism, compassion, and unity.
Source: Government of India
Source: Government of India (4)
One of President Donald Trump’s most contentious policies – his attempt to restrict automatic birthright citizenship – arrives at the U.S. Supreme Court this week with an unusual twist: The justices may focus on something else entirely.
Federal judges in Washington state, Massachusetts and Maryland issued orders blocking Trump’s January executive order nationwide, finding the directive likely violated language in the U.S. Constitution concerning citizenship for babies born in the United States.
But through an emergency filing, Trump’s administration has focused the Supreme Court’s attention not on the legality of the action by the Republican president but rather on the permissibility of the actions by the three judges – whether federal judges should have the power to issue broad orders that block challenged polices on a nationwide, or “universal,” basis.
The administration asked the court to narrow the injunctions to let the government enforce Trump’s directive – part of his hardline approach to immigration – to the greatest extent possible while the legal fight over the policy plays out.
The court may do so “without considering the underlying merits” of Trump’s action, the administration asserted.
That approach would set up the possibility of the court, which has as a 6-3 conservative majority, allowing broad enforcement of the policy without assessing whether or not it is legal.
The matter came to the court on a compressed timeline and with minimal written briefing.
The way the court is considering the case “seems quite strange,” said Alan Trammell, a professor at Washington and Lee University School of Law in Virginia, because “even though the substantive question of birthright citizenship technically isn’t before the court, it still looms large.”
“It concerns one of the most important provisions of the Constitution and implicates a raging political debate,” Trammell said.
Trump’s order, signed on his first day back in office, directed federal agencies to refuse to recognize the citizenship of U.S.-born children who do not have at least one parent who is an American citizen or lawful permanent resident.
Trump’s order was challenged by Democratic attorneys general from 22 states as well as individual pregnant immigrants and advocacy groups. The plaintiffs have said the directive violates a right enshrined in the U.S. Constitution’s 14th Amendment, which was ratified in 1868 and long has been understood to confer citizenship to virtually anyone born in the United States.
Trammell noted that the administration has not contested whether the injunctions should have been issued, asking the justices only to scale back their nationwide effect to protect just the plaintiffs in the cases.
“The situation would be very odd indeed if the court concluded that the plaintiffs’ view of the merits is correct, yet gave only the individual plaintiffs the benefit of that ruling,” Trammell said.
‘BIRTH TOURISM’
The 14th Amendment states that all “persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.”
The administration contends that the 14th Amendment does not extend to immigrants who are in the country illegally or even to immigrants whose presence is lawful but temporary, such as university students or those on work visas.
Automatic birthright citizenship does not reflect the best reading of the 14th Amendment and it encourages “birth tourism” by expectant mothers traveling the United States to give birth and secure citizenship for their children, the administration argued in court filings.
At the Supreme Court, the administration has targeted only the universal scope of the injunctions, content to leave them in place to protect only the people who sued as well as the residents of the 22 states, assuming the Supreme Court finds that these states have the necessary legal standing to bring their cases. That outcome would let Trump’s order go into effect in the 28 states that did not sue, aside from any plaintiffs from those states.
The Justice Department said the issuance of broad judicial injunctions has bedeviled administrations of both parties, Republican and Democratic, and must be urgently rectified by the Supreme Court. Trump himself on March 20 called the situation “toxic” and urged the Supreme Court to act.
Since Trump returned to office, many of his numerous executive orders and other initiatives have been impeded by judges, including through universal injunctions.
“The need for this court’s intervention has become urgent as universal injunctions have reached tsunami levels,” the Justice Department said in a written filing.
If the justices agree to scale back the judicial blocks, it could lead to a nation geographically fractured between places where babies are born with automatic citizenship and places where they are not, the plaintiffs said.
“An infant would be a United States citizen and full member of society if born in New Jersey, but a deportable noncitizen if born in Tennessee,” the plaintiffs in the Maryland case told the justices.
IDAHO TRANSGENDER CASE
The Justice Department has cited the Supreme Court’s action in a case last year to back up its request to narrow the injunctions. In that case, called Labrador v. Poe, Idaho asked the justices to let the state enforce a Republican-backed ban on gender-affirming care for transgender minors after a federal judge blocked it as unconstitutional.
The Supreme Court, over the dissent of its three liberal members, granted Idaho’s request that the statewide injunction be pared back to cover only the transgender plaintiffs who actually sued.
The scope of an injunction is significant, the Justice Department told the Supreme Court, and ensuring that lower courts do not act beyond their limited judicial power “is just as critical as merits review,” meaning an assessment of an action’s legality.
A Justice Department spokesperson did not respond to a request for comment.
Some legal experts said the cases differ for numerous reasons. For instance, they said, the Idaho case involved one state, not a presidential executive order applying nationally.
Even though the administration has made the dispute primarily about universal injunctions, some court observers have said the justices could decide to rule on the legality of Trump’s order anyway.
It is unusual for the court “to be considering an emergency application in this context,” University of Chicago law professor William Baude said.
“Because of that, we won’t know what the court is going to focus on until the oral arguments start,” Baude added.
(Reuters)
Source: Northern Territory Police and Fire Services
Edgar’s Inn is the perfect spot for you and your dog.
Love to dine out but feel guilty leaving the pooch at home? We’ve rounded up some great dog-friendly food spots across Canberra so your furry friend can dine with you.
These venues have spacious outdoor areas and dog bowls, some even offer blankets, beds and dog-menus!
Edgar’s is a pawfect lunch spot for you and your pup. It has a great shaded outdoor dining space and a park next door for walkies.
Stella’s loves dogs so much they created a dog menu. From dog beer to puppaccinos, they’ve got it all! Plus, great views of Lake Ginninderra.
Assembly has two great outdoor spaces for you and your pup to enjoy:
Despite the name you won’t find pigs at this café, but you will always find a dog or five. With a great shaded outdoor space and dog bowls a-plenty, Little Oink is a great spot to dine out – rain, hail or shine.
If you don’t love dogs, this probably isn’t the place for you. There’s always loads of dogs hanging out at Gang Gang, and for good reason! This place is super pup-friendly, with outdoor heaters for the cooler months and lots of shade for warmer months.
Burgers, beers and dogs? Sold. This place has plenty of great outdoor seating for you and your pups. It’s even known to let good boys inside, too.
Dine with the pup in the venue’s back courtyard or sit at the front of the café. The latter is recommended for most amount of pats, plus there are treats available. This venue will have your dog’s tail wagging.
This is the ideal spot for your doggo, with a great shaded outdoor dining area right next to a big grassy lawn, they can do their business so you can take your time dining.
Every day is a celebration of dogs at The Dock – one visit to their Instagram will show you, but they do also have ‘dog day’ events regularly, where all the regulars meet up. Pick a sunny or a shady spot. Once you’re done, you can enjoy a stroll along the foreshore.
Get ACT news and events delivered straight to your inbox, sign up to our email newsletter:
Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments
To mark Mental Health Awareness Week, new measures in the Crime and Policing Bill will protect vulnerable people who are encouraged or assisted to self-harm
Vulnerable people who are encouraged or assisted to harm themselves will have greater protection under a new offence being introduced as part of the Crime and Policing Bill.
To mark Mental Health Awareness Week, the government is pushing ahead with vital new measures to further protect those at risk – with recent NHS data showing self-harm hospital admissions among young people have soared by a third.
The government is going further to strengthen safeguards – broadening the law to capture more malicious behaviour, bringing parity between the online and offline world and protect people who are at risk of suicide or self-harm.
The new laws will make it a criminal offence to directly assist someone to self-harm – such as giving someone a blade or sending them pills – whether it is done in person or online. This will build on existing laws that already prevent people encouraging or assisting suicide or self-harm through content online.
Minister for Victims and Violence Against Women and Girls (VAWG), Alex Davies-Jones, said
The prevalence of serious self-harm, especially in young people, is hugely concerning. It is an awful truth that some people encourage or assist such behaviour, and one I wanted to draw attention to during Mental Health Awareness Week.
Whether encouragement is by communication, or more directly by assistance, the outcome is the same. We are determined that anybody intending to see others harm themselves is stopped and dealt with in the strongest way.
Under this broader offence, someone can also be prosecuted if their intention is to cause serious self-harm even when this does not result in injuries to the vulnerable person. Those found guilty face up to 5 years in prison.
Self-harm can occur at any age. A recent study on people aged 13 to 15 reported that prevalence was greater among girls (22.7%) than boys (8.5%).
There is also increasing evidence of links between internet usage and self-harm, with one study finding that, among self-harm hospital presentations, the prevalence of suicide and self-harm related internet use was 26% among children and adolescents.
Anybody struggling with self-harm or suicidal thoughts is urged to get in touch with their GP or get advice and emotional support from organisations such as the Samaritans, Mind, or SANEline.
Source: US Federal Emergency Management Agency
Headline: DHS Releases Records of TdA Associate Deported to CECOT
lass=”text-align-center”>Removal documents show criminal alien’s rap sheet included an arrest by the NYPD for having a loaded firearm on school grounds and ammunition feeding devices
WASHINGTON – The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) released records involving Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s (ICE) arrest of Merwil Alberto Gutierrez Flores
Merwil is a Tren de Aragua associate whose criminal history included possession of a firearm on school grounds and ammunition feeding devices
Below is an excerpt of Flores’s I-213 form showing criminal history:
The full document can be found here
“Merwil Alberto Gutierrez Flores was deported to CECOT because he is an associate of Tren de Aragua—a foreign terrorist organization—whose criminal record included an arrest for having a loaded firearm and ammunition feeding devices at a school” Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin said
“The Biden Administration released this dangerous criminal into our communities in 2023
President Trump and Secretary Noem are getting these criminals off our streets and out of country
When Americans break the law, they face consequences
Now, criminal aliens and gangs finally do, too
”
On Feb
24, FBI agents and New York Police Department officers arrested Merwil Alberto Gutierrez Flores—an illegal alien from Venezuela—in New York for criminal possession of a weapon, loaded firearm, criminal possession of a weapon, loaded firearm on school grounds, criminal possession of stolen property, and unlawful possession of certain ammunition feeding devices
On Feb
25, he was turned over to the custody of ICE
On March 15, he was removed to El Salvador’s Terrorism Confinement Center
Flores illegally entered the U
S
on June 21, 2023, in El Paso, Texas
That same day, U
S
Border Patrol agents encountered and arrested him
He was then released into the country under the Biden administration’s policies
Under our backlogged immigration system, this criminal illegal alien was allowed to live in our country and terrorize our communities till his February 1, 2027, immigration hearing
Source: Republic of China Taiwan
In a recent interview with Japan’s Nikkei, President Lai Ching-te responded to questions regarding Taiwan-Japan and Taiwan-United States relations, cross-strait relations, the semiconductor industry, and the international economic and trade landscape. The interview was published by Nikkei on May 13.
President Lai indicated that Nikkei, Inc. is a global news organization that has received significant recognition both domestically and internationally, and that he is deeply honored to be interviewed by Nikkei and grateful for their invitation. The president said that he would like to take this rare opportunity to thank Japan’s government, National Diet, society, and public for their longstanding support for Taiwan. Noting that current Prime Minister Ishiba Shigeru and former Prime Ministers Abe Shinzo, Suga Yoshihide, and Kishida Fumio have all strongly supported Taiwan, he said that the peoples of Taiwan and Japan also have a deep mutual affection, and that through the interview, he hopes to enhance the bilateral relationship between Taiwan and Japan, deepen the affection between our peoples, and foster more future cooperation to promote prosperity and development in both countries.
Following is the text of the questions and the president’s responses:
Nikkei: What is your personal view regarding the free trade system and the recent tariff war?
President Lai: Over the past few decades, the free economy headed by the Western world and led by the US has brought economic prosperity and political stability to Taiwan and Japan. At the same time, we have also learned or followed many Western values.
I believe that Taiwan and Japan are exemplary students, but some countries are not. Therefore, the biggest crisis right now is China, which exploits the free trade system to engage in plagiarism and counterfeiting, infringe on intellectual property rights, and even provide massive government subsidies that facilitate the dumping of low-priced goods worldwide, which has a major impact on many countries including Japan and Taiwan. If this kind of unfair trade is not resolved, the stable societies and economic prosperity we have painstakingly built over decades, as well as some of the values we pursue, could be destroyed. I therefore think it is worthwhile for us to observe the recent willingness of the US to address unfair trade, and if necessary, offer assistance.
Our national strategic plan for Taiwanese industries is for them to be rooted in Taiwan while expanding their global presence and marketing worldwide. Therefore, while the 32 percent tariff increase imposed by the US on Taiwan is indeed a major challenge, we are willing to address it seriously and find opportunities within that challenge, making Taiwan’s strategic plan for industry even more comprehensive.
Nikkei: What is your view on Taiwan’s trade arrangements?
President Lai: In 2010 China accounted for 83.8 percent of Taiwan’s outbound investment, but last year it accounted for only 7.5 percent. In 2020, 43.9 percent of Taiwan’s exports went to China, but that figure dropped to 31.7 percent in 2024. We have systematically transferred investments from Taiwanese enterprises to Japan, Southeast Asia, Europe, and the US. Therefore, last year Taiwan’s largest outbound investment was in the US, accounting for roughly 40 percent of the total. Nevertheless, only 23.4 percent of Taiwanese products were sold to the US, with 76.6 percent sold to places other than the US.
In other words, we don’t want to put all our eggs in one basket, and hope to establish a global presence. Under these circumstances, Taiwan is very eager to cooperate with Japan. At this moment, the Indo-Pacific and international community really need Japan’s leadership, especially to make the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) excel in its functions. We also ask Japan to support Taiwan’s CPTPP accession.
Taiwan hopes to sign an Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA) with Japan, to build closer ties in economic trade and promote further investment. We also hope to strengthen relations with the European Union, and even other regions. Currently, we are proposing an initiative on global semiconductor supply chain partnerships for democracies, because the semiconductor industry is an ecosystem. For example, Japan has materials, equipment, and technology; the US has IC design and marketing; Taiwan has production and manufacturing; and the Netherlands excels in equipment. We therefore hope to leverage Taiwan’s advantages in production and manufacturing to connect the democratic community and establish a global non-red supply chain for semiconductors, ensuring further world prosperity and development in the future, and ensuring that free trade can continue to function without being affected by dumping, which would undermine future prosperity and development.
We want industries to expand their global presence and market internationally while staying rooted here in Taiwan. Having industries rooted in Taiwan involves promoting pay raises for employees, tax cuts, and deregulation, as well as promoting enterprise investment tax credits. We have also proposed Three Major Programs for Investing in Taiwan for Taiwanese enterprises. We are actively resolving issues regarding access to water, electricity, land, human resources, and professional talent so that the business community can return to Taiwan to invest, or enterprises in Taiwan can increase their investments. We are also actively signing bilateral investment agreements with friends and allies so that when our companies invest and expand their presence abroad, their rights and interests as investors are ensured.
Additionally, as I just mentioned, we hope to sign an EPA with Japan, similar to the Taiwan-US Initiative on 21st-Century Trade and the Economic Prosperity Partnership Dialogue, or the Enhanced Trade Partnership arrangement with the United Kingdom, or similar agreements or memorandums of understanding with Canada and Australia that allow Taiwanese products to be marketed worldwide. Those are our overall arrangements.
Looking at the history of Taiwan’s industrial development, of course it began in Taiwan, and then moved west to China and south to Southeast Asia. We hope to take this opportunity to strengthen cooperation with Japan to the north, across the Pacific Ocean to the east, and develop the North American market, making Taiwan’s industries even stronger. In other words, while we see the current reciprocal tariffs imposed by the US as a kind of challenge, we also view these changes positively.
Nikkei: Due to pressure from China, it is difficult for Taiwan to participate in international frameworks such as the CPTPP or sign an EPA with Japan. What is your view on this situation?
President Lai: The key point is what kind of attitude we should adopt in viewing China’s acts of oppression. If we act based on our belief in free trade, or on the universal values we pursue – democracy, freedom, and respect for human rights – and also on the understanding that a bilateral trade agreement between Taiwan and Japan would contribute to the economic prosperity and development of both countries, or that Taiwan’s accession to the CPTPP would benefit progress and prosperity in the Indo-Pacific region, then I personally hope that our friends and allies will strongly support us.
Nikkei: Regarding the Trump administration’s “reciprocal tariff” policy and the possibility of taxing semiconductors, how do you interpret their intentions? How does Taiwan plan to respond?
President Lai: Since President Trump took office, I have paid close attention to interviews with both him and his staff. Several of his main intentions are: First, he wants to address the US fiscal situation. For example, while the US GDP is about US$29 trillion annually, its national debt stands at US$36 trillion, which is roughly 124 percent of GDP. Second, annual government spending exceeds US$6.5 trillion, but revenues are only around US$4.5 trillion, resulting in a nearly US$2 trillion deficit each year, about 7 percent of GDP. Third, the US pays nearly US$1.2 trillion in interest annually, which exceeds the US$1 trillion defense budget and accounts for more than 3 percent of GDP. Fourth, he still wants to implement tax cuts, aiming to reduce taxes for 85 percent of Americans. This would cost between US$500 billion and US$1 trillion. These points illustrate his first goal: solving the fiscal problem.
Second, the US feels the threat of China and believes that reindustrialization is essential. Without reindustrialization, the US risks a growing gap in industrial capacity compared to China. Third, in this era of global smart technology, President Trump wants to lead the nation to become a world center of AI. Fourth, he aims to ensure world peace and prevent future wars. So, if you ask me what the US seeks to achieve, I would say these four areas form the core of its intentions. That is why President Trump has raised tariffs, demanded that trading partners purchase more American goods, and encouraged friendly and allied nations to invest in the US, all in order to achieve these goals.
The 32 percent reciprocal tariff poses a critical challenge for Taiwan, and we must treat it seriously. Our approach is not confrontation, but negotiation to reduce tariffs. We have also agreed to measures such as procurement, investment, resolving non-tariff trade barriers, and addressing origin washing in order to effectively reduce the trade deficit between Taiwan and the US. Of course, through this negotiation process, we also hope to turn challenges into opportunities. First, we aim to start negotiations from the proposal of zero tariffs and seek to establish a bilateral trade agreement with the US. Second, we hope to support US reindustrialization and its aim to become a world AI hub through investment, while simultaneously upgrading and transforming Taiwan’s industries. This would help further integrate Taiwan’s industries into the US economic structure, ensuring Taiwan’s long-term development.
As I have repeatedly emphasized, Taiwan’s national industrial strategy is for industries to stay firmly rooted in Taiwan while expanding their global presence and marketing worldwide. We have gone from moving westward across the Taiwan Strait, to shifting southbound, to working closer northward with Japan, and now the time is ripe for us to expand eastward by investing in North America. In other words, while we take this challenge seriously to protect national interests and ensure that no industry is sacrificed, we also hope these negotiations will lead to deeper Taiwan-US trade relations through Taiwanese investment in the US. These are our expectations.
Naturally, the reciprocal tariffs imposed by the US will have an impact on Taiwanese industries. In response, the Taiwanese government has already proposed support measures for affected industries totaling NT$93 billion. In addition, we have outlined broader needs for Taiwan’s long-term development, which will be covered by a special budget proposal of NT$410 billion. This has already been approved by the Executive Yuan and will be submitted to the Legislative Yuan for review. This special budget proposal addresses four main areas: supporting industries, stabilizing employment, protecting people’s livelihoods, and enhancing resilience.
As for tariffs on semiconductors, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) has committed to investing in the US at the request of its customers. I believe TSMC’s industry chain will follow suit. These are concrete actions that are unrelated to tariffs. However, if the US were to invoke Section 232 and impose tariffs on semiconductors or related industries, it would discourage Taiwanese semiconductor and ICT investments in the US. We will make this position clear to the US going forward.
Among Taiwan’s exports to the US, there are two main categories: ICT products and electronic components, which together account for 65.4 percent. These are essential to the US, unlike final goods such as cups, tables, or mattresses. What Taiwan sells to the US are the technological products required by AI designers like NVIDIA, AMD, Amazon, Google, and Apple. Therefore, we will make sure the US understands clearly that we are not exporting end products, but the high-tech components necessary for the US to reindustrialize and become a global AI center. Furthermore, Taiwan is also willing to increase its defense budget and military procurement. We are committed to defending ourselves and are strongly willing to cooperate with friends and allies to ensure regional peace and stability. This is also something President Trump hopes to see.
Nikkei: Could TSMC’s fabs overseas weaken Taiwan’s strategic position as a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing? And could that then give other countries fewer incentives to protect Taiwan?
President Lai: Political leaders around the world including Japan’s Prime Minister Ishiba and former Prime Ministers Abe, Suga, and Kishida have emphasized, at the G7 and other major international fora, that peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait are essential for global security and prosperity. In other words, the international community cares about Taiwan and supports peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait because Taiwan is located in the first island chain in the Indo-Pacific, directly facing China. If Taiwan is not protected, China’s expansionist ambitions will certainly grow, which would impact the current rules-based international order. Thus, the international community willingly cares about Taiwan and supports stability in the Taiwan Strait. That is the reason, and it has no direct connection with TSMC. After all, TSMC has not made investments in that many countries. That point, I think, is clear.
TSMC’s investments in Japan, Europe, and the US are all natural, normal economic and investment activities. Taiwan is a democratic country whose society is based on the rule of law, so when Taiwanese companies need to invest around the world for business needs, the government will support those investments in principle so long as they do not harm national interests.
After TSMC Chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家) held a press conference with President Trump to announce the investment in the US, he returned to Taiwan to hold a press conference with me here at the Presidential Office, where he explained to the Taiwanese public that TSMC’s R&D center will remain in Taiwan and that the facilities it has already committed to investing in here will not change and will not be affected. So, to put it another way, TSMC will not be weakened by its investment in the US. I want to emphasize this once more: Taiwan has strengths in semiconductor manufacturing, and Taiwan is very willing to work alongside other democratic countries to promote the next stage of global prosperity and development.
Nikkei: It feels as though we are returning to what was previously called the Cold War, with two opposing blocs – East and West – facing off again. Between the US and China, which side should we choose?
President Lai: Some experts and scholars describe the current situation as entering a new Cold War era between democratic and authoritarian camps. Others assert that the war has already begun, including information warfare, economic and trade wars, and the ongoing wars in Europe – the Russo-Ukrainian War – and the Middle East, and the Israel-Hamas conflict. These are all matters experts have cautioned about. I am not a historian, so I will not attempt to define today’s political situation from an academic standpoint. However, I believe that every country has a choice. That is to say, Taiwan, Japan, or any other nation does not necessarily have to choose between the US and China. What we are deciding is whether our country will maintain a democratic constitutional system or regress into an authoritarian regime. This is essentially a choice of values – not merely a choice between two major powers.
Taiwan’s situation is different from other countries because we face a direct threat from China. We have experienced military conflicts such as the August 23 Artillery Battle and the Battle of Guningtou – actual wars between the Republic of China and the People’s Republic of China. China’s ambition to annex Taiwan has never wavered. Today, China’s political and military intimidation, as well as internal united front infiltration, are growing increasingly intense. Therefore, to defend democracy and sovereignty, protect our free and democratic system, and ensure the safety of our people’s lives and property, Taiwan’s choice is clear.
China’s military exercises are not limited to the Taiwan Strait, and include the East China Sea, South China Sea, and even the Sea of Japan, as well as areas around Korea and Australia. Taiwan, Japan, Australia, and the Philippines are all democratic nations. Taiwan’s choice is clear, and I believe Japan also has no other choice. We are all democratic countries whose people have long pursued the universal values of democracy, freedom, and respect for human rights. That is what is most important.
Nikkei: As tensions between the US and China intensify, what roles can Taiwan and Japan play?
President Lai: In my view, Japan is a powerful nation. I sincerely hope that Japan can take a leading role amid these changes in the international landscape. I believe that countries in the Indo-Pacific region are also willing to respond. I think there are several areas where we can work together: first, democracy and peace; second, innovation and prosperity; and third, justice and sustainability.
In the face of authoritarian threats, we should let peace be our beacon and democracy our compass as we respond to the challenges posed by authoritarian states. Second, as the world enters an era characterized by the comprehensive adoption of smart technologies, Japan and Taiwan should collaborate in the field of innovation to further drive regional prosperity and development. Third is justice and sustainability. Because international society still has many issues that need to be resolved, Taiwan and Japan can cooperate for the public good, helping countries in need around the world, and cooperating to address climate change and achieve net-zero transition by 2050.
Nikkei: Do you hope that the US will continue to be a leader in the liberal democratic system?
President Lai: Although the US severed diplomatic ties with the Republic of China, for the past few decades it has assisted Taiwan in various areas such as national defense, security, and countering threats from China, based on the Taiwan Relations Act and the Six Assurances. Taiwan has also benefited, directly and indirectly, in terms of politics, democracy, and economic prosperity thanks to the US. Therefore, Taiwan naturally hopes that the US remains strong and continues to lead the world.
When the US encounters difficulties, whether financial difficulties, reindustrialization issues, or becoming a global center for AI, and hopes to receive support from its friends and allies to jointly safeguard regional peace and stability, Taiwan is willing to stand together for a common cause. If the US remains strong, that helps Taiwan, the Indo-Pacific region, and the world as a whole.
The vital role of the US on the global stage has not changed. However, after decades of shouldering global responsibilities, it has encountered some issues. Now, it has to make adjustments, and I firmly believe it will do so swiftly, and quickly resume its leadership role in the world.
Nikkei: I remember you said during your election campaign that you would like to invite China’s President Xi Jinping for bubble tea. Have you changed your mind?
President Lai: Taiwan is a peace-loving country, and Taiwanese society is inherently kind. Therefore, we hope to get along peacefully with China, living in peace and mutual prosperity. So, during my term as vice president, I was expressing the goodwill of Taiwanese society. Of course, I understand that China’s President Xi would have certain difficulties in accepting this. However, I must emphasize that the goodwill of Taiwanese society has always existed. If China reflects on the past two or three decades, it will see that its economy was able to develop with Taiwan as its largest foreign investor. Every year, 1 to 2 million Taiwanese were starting businesses or investing in China, creating numerous job opportunities and stabilizing Chinese society. While many Taiwanese businesses have profited, Chinese society has benefited even more. In addition, every time a natural disaster occurs, if China is in need, Taiwanese always offer donations. Therefore, I hope that China can face the reality of the Republic of China’s existence, and understand that the people of Taiwan hope to continue living free and democratic lives with respect for human rights. I also hope China can pay attention to the goodwill of Taiwanese society. We have not abandoned the notion that as long as there is parity, dignity, exchange, and cooperation, the goodwill of choosing dialogue over confrontation and exchange over containment will always exist.
Nikkei: What is your view on the national security reforms in response to China’s espionage activities and infiltration attempts?
President Lai: China’s united front infiltration activities in Taiwan are indeed very serious. China’s ambitions to annex Taiwan rely not only on the use of political and military intimidation, but also on its long-term united front and infiltration activities in Taiwanese society. Recently, the Taiwan High Prosecutors Office of the Ministry of Justice prosecuted 64 spies, which is three times the number in 2021. In addition to active-duty military personnel, many retired military personnel were also indicted. Moreover, Taiwan also has the Chinese Unification Promotion Party, which has a background in organized crime, Rehabilitation Alliance Party, which was established by retired military personnel, and Republic of China Taiwan Military Government, which is also composed of retired generals. These are all China’s front organizations, and they plan one day to engage in collaboration within Taiwan. This shows the seriousness of China’s infiltration in Taiwan. Therefore, in the recent past I convened a high-level national security meeting and proposed 17 response strategies across five areas. The five areas include the following: first, to address China’s threat to Taiwan’s sovereignty; second, to respond to the threat of China’s obscuring the Taiwanese people’s sense of national identity; third, to respond to the threat of China’s infiltrating and recruiting members of the ROC Armed Forces as spies; fourth, to respond to the threat of China’s infiltration of Taiwanese society through societal exchanges and united front work; and fifth, to respond to the threat of China using “integration plans” to draw Taiwan’s young people and Taiwanese businesses into its united front activities. In response to these five major threats, I have proposed 17 response strategies. One of which is to restore the military trial system. If active-duty military personnel commit military crimes, they must be subject to military trials. This expresses the Taiwanese government’s determination to respond to China’s united front infiltration and the subversion of Taiwan.
Nikkei: What actions can Taiwan take to guard against China’s threats to regional security?
President Lai: Many people are worried that the increasingly tense situation may lead to accidental conflict and the outbreak of war. My view is that Taiwan is committed to facing China’s various threats with caution. Taiwan is never the source of these problems. If there is an accidental conflict and it turns into a full-scale war, it will certainly be a deliberate act by China by using an accidental conflict as a pretext. When China expanded its military presence in the East China Sea and South China Sea, the international community did not stop it; when China conducted exercises in the Taiwan Strait, the international community did not take strong measures to prevent this from happening. Now, China is conducting gray-zone exercises, which are aggressions against not only the Taiwan Strait, the South China Sea, and the East China Sea, but also extending to the Sea of Japan and waters near South Korea. At this moment, Taiwan, the Philippines, Japan, and even the US should face these developments candidly and seriously. We must exhibit unity and cooperation to prevent China’s gray-zone aggression from continuing to expand and prevent China from shifting from a military exercise to combat. If no action is taken now, the situation may become increasingly serious.
Nikkei: Some US analysts point out that China will have the ability to invade Taiwan around 2027. How do you assess the risk of a Chinese invasion at this stage?
President Lai: As the country on the receiving end of threats and aggression, Taiwan must plan for the worst and make the best preparations. Our armed forces have a famous saying: “Do not count on the enemy not showing up; count on being ready should it strike.” This is why I proposed the Four Pillars of Peace action plan. First, we must strengthen our national defense. Second, we must strengthen economic resilience. Not only must our economy remain strong, but it must also be resilient. We cannot put all our eggs in the same basket, in China, as we have done in the past. Third, we must stand shoulder to shoulder with friends and allies such as Japan and the US, as well as the democratic community, and we must demonstrate the strength of deterrence to prevent China from making the wrong judgment. Fourth, I would like to emphasize again that as long as China treats Taiwan with parity and dignity, Taiwan is willing to conduct exchanges and cooperate with China and seek cross-strait peace and mutual prosperity through exchanges and cooperation.
Nikkei: Amid intensifying US-China confrontation, in which areas do you think Taiwan and Japan should strengthen cooperation? In addition, Japan’s Ishiba administration is also a minority government. What are your expectations for the Ishiba administration?
President Lai: In the face of rapid and tremendous changes in the political situation, every government faces considerable challenges, especially for minority governments. But the Japanese government led by Prime Minister Ishiba has quite adequately responded with various strategies. Furthermore, Japan is different from Taiwan. Although Japan’s ruling party lacks a majority, political parties in Japan engage in competition domestically while exhibiting unity externally. Taiwan’s situation is more challenging, because the ruling and opposition parties hold different views on the direction of the country, due to differences in national identity.
In the future, I hope that Taiwan and Japan will enjoy even more comprehensive cooperation. I have always believed that deep historical bonds connect Taiwan and Japan. Over the past several decades, when encountering natural disasters and tragedies, our two nations have assisted each other with mutual care and support. The affection between the people of Taiwan and Japan is like that of a family. In addition, both countries face the threat of authoritarianism. We share a mission to safeguard universal values such as democracy, freedom, and respect for human rights. Our two countries should be more open to cooperation in various areas to maintain regional peace and stability as well as to strengthen cooperation in economic and industrial development, such as for semiconductor industry chains and everyday applications of AI, including robots and drones. We can also cooperate on climate change response, such as in hydrogen energy and other strategies. Our two countries should also continue to strengthen people-to-people exchanges. I would like to take this opportunity to once again invite our good friends from Japan to visit Taiwan for tourism and learn more about Taiwan. The Taiwanese people wholeheartedly welcome our Japanese friends.
Source: Hong Kong Information Services
The Acting Chief Executive-in-Council today approved the making of two pieces of subsidiary legislation under the Safeguarding National Security Ordinance (SNSO), which were gazetted and came into effect immediately.
They provide specific details in respect of the provisions of the Hong Kong National Security Law (HKNSL) concerning the mandate of the Office for Safeguarding National Security of the Central People’s Government (CPG) in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (OSNS) and declare the premises where the OSNS performs its mandate as prohibited places.
The Hong Kong SAR Government said national security risks to which the Hong Kong SAR is exposed can arise all of a sudden with the increasingly turbulent global geopolitical landscape.
Therefore, the Hong Kong SAR Government must perform its constitutional duty to continue to improve the legal system and enforcement mechanisms for safeguarding national security and to formulate comprehensive measures for safeguarding national security to better implement the mechanisms for safeguarding national security, and prevent and tackle in a timely manner national security risks that may arise unexpectedly.
The subsidiary legislation clearly outlines the Hong Kong SAR Committee for Safeguarding National Security (CSNS) making an overall plan for, and co-ordinating, the implementation of the opinions provided by the OSNS on the OSNS’s oversight and guidance, and the CSNS Secretariat’s assistance in giving effect thereto, for the better carrying into effect of the relevant provisions of the HKNSL.
The HKNSL Aricle 55 provides that the OSNS shall, upon approval by the CPG, exercise jurisdiction over a case concerning the four types of offences endangering national security under the HKNSL under three specified special circumstances, which target a very small number of endangering national security cases that are of a serious and egregious nature and involve a significant impact.
The subsidiary legislation provides for the implementation details, including requirements on public servants to provide all necessary and reasonable assistance to the OSNS in a timely manner; any person must comply with legal instrument issued by the OSNS under the HKNSL Article 57; and the provision of immunity from civil liability for complying with the OSNS’s legal instrument. Furthermore, the subsidiary legislation provides for relevant offences, including offences for failing to comply with legal instrument, providing false or misleading information, and disclosing information on the OSNS’s investigation.
The subsidiary legislation also provides for specific details in respect of the provisions of the HKNSL regarding protection in respect of the OSNS and its staff in the performance of its mandate, including requirements on the Hong Kong SAR Government and any public servant to provide, in accordance with the law and in a timely manner, all necessary and reasonable assistance, facilitation, support, backing and protection; admissibility of an identification document or a document of certification created or issued by the OSNS to be in evidence in legal proceedings; making the acts of wilfully resisting or obstructing the OSNS in the performance of a duty, impersonating a staff member of the OSNS, or forging documents of the OSNS, an offence; and the obligation of any person to keep confidential the work-related information in connection with the OSNS.
In addition, the subsidiary legislation clearly sets out the detailed addresses of the prohibited places and the clear coordinates of the points that can be linked to clearly define the entire prohibited area.
Noting that the subsidiary legislation will go through the negative vetting procedure at the Legislative Council, the Hong Kong SAR Government said it will make every effort for the early completion of the scrutiny with a view to effectively safeguarding national security as soon as possible.
It added that the subsidiary legislation will not affect the lives of the general public, nor the normal operation of any institution and organisation. Plus, the places designated as prohibited places do not involve private residences and will not cause any unreasonable impact on the surrounding community.
Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region
Candidate Eligibility Review Committee announces 36 registrations of ex-officio members of Election Committee valid
In accordance with section 5J of the Schedule to the Chief Executive Election Ordinance (Cap. 569), a person holding a specified office under Part 2A of the Schedule may register as an ex-officio member of the EC. If the specified person is not eligible to be registered as an ex-officio member or is the holder of more than one specified office, he/she may designate another person who is holding an office in a relevant body in relation to the specified office to be registered as an ex-officio member.
The Registration and Electoral Office has received 36 registrations of ex-officio members. After review, the CERC has determined that these 36 registrations are valid. The subsectors and specified offices involved are listed below:
| SubsectorThe CERC is chaired by the Chief Secretary for Administration, Mr Chan Kwok-ki, with three official members (the Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs, Mr Erick Tsang Kwok-wai; the Secretary for Security, Mr Tang Ping-keung; and the Secretary for Home and Youth Affairs, Miss Alice Mak Mei-kuen) and three non-official members (Miss Elsie Leung Oi-sie, Mrs Rita Fan Hsu Lai-tai and Professor Lawrence Lau Juen-yee). In accordance with Annex I to the Basic Law, the CERC is responsible for reviewing and confirming the eligibility of candidates for the membership of the EC (including ex-officio members). The CERC decides whether such persons comply with the legal requirements and conditions of upholding the Basic Law of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR) of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and bearing allegiance to the HKSAR of the PRC. Issued at HKT 15:15 NNNN |
Source: New Zealand Police
Please attribute to Police Commissioner Richard Chambers:
I appreciate the resignation of Jevon McSkimming raises questions, but the criminal investigation cannot be compromised by commenting on the circumstances of it at this point.
However, I can say that I have always made it very clear that trust and confidence in Police is a top priority for me as Commissioner.
I have also made clear that I expect leadership to be accountable. The public and my Police colleagues can rest assured that very much remains the case.
I take very seriously anything that puts trust and confidence and the reputation of Police at risk and will act to address it.
I have high expectations of all police staff and will address it if those standards are not met, irrespective of rank or role.
This is not just about my own views and expectations. It is the standard the public and the Police deserve.
ENDS
Source: Northern Territory Police and Fire Services
Strike Force Viper and Dog Operations have arrested two male youths involved in a robbery in Alice Springs CBD today.
Around 12:30pm, police received a report that a female had been robbed while parked in her vehicle on Gregory Terrace. It is alleged the two male youths approached the vehicle, opened the passenger door and stole the victim’s wallet from the centre console. They then allegedly pulled the woman from the vehicle and onto the ground, causing minor injuries to her leg, before fleeing the scene on foot.
Strike Force Viper and the Dog Operations Unit conducted patrols of the CBD, locating and arresting the alleged offenders, aged 14 and 17, on Gap Road.
Both males remain in custody, with charges expected to follow.
Police urge anyone with information about the incident to contact them on 131 444 and quote reference number P25130600. Anonymous reports can be made via Crime Stoppers on 1800 333 000.
Source: Government of India
Source: Government of India (4)
Bangladesh’s Election Commission has suspended the registration of ousted former prime minister Sheikh Hasina’s Awami League, effectively barring the party from contesting the next national elections.
The move comes after the interim government of Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus, banned all activities of the Awami League under the Anti-Terrorism Act after days of protests.
The government cited national security threats and an ongoing war crimes investigation against the party’s top leadership over deaths of hundreds of protesters.
“With the home ministry’s ban on all activities of the Awami League and its affiliated organisations, the Election Commission has decided to suspend the party’s registration,” Election Commission Secretary Akhtar Ahmed told reporters late on Monday.
Under Bangladesh’s electoral laws, a political party must be registered with the Election Commission to participate in national polls. The suspension means the Awami League — which led the country for more than 20 years — is now officially disqualified from contesting future elections unless the ban is lifted and the registration restored.
The Election Commission also issued a directive prohibiting the party and its affiliates from conducting any political activities, including publications, media appearances, online and social media campaigns, processions, rallies, or conferences, until the International Crimes Tribunal completes its proceedings.
Hasina, credited with turning around the economy but accused of human rights violations and the suppression of dissent, won a fourth straight term in 2024, but the poll was boycotted by the main opposition, whose top leaders were in jail or in exile.
The country has seen rising tensions and protests in recent months, after deadly protests forced Hasina to flee to India in August 2024 and an interim government led by Yunus took charge.
Yunus, who is not aligned to any party, has pledged reforms and said national elections could be delayed until 2026 and that he is not interested in running.
Political parties, including former prime minister Khaleda Zia’s Bangladesh Nationalist Party, have demanded an early poll and return to a democratically-elected government.
The newly formed student-driven National Citizen Party, which emerged from last year’s uprising that toppled Hasina, wants polls only after reforms are implemented.
The unrest began in July with student protests against public sector job quotas, but quickly morphed into one of the deadliest periods of political violence since Bangladesh’s independence in 1971.
The Awami League, founded in 1949 and once revered for leading Bangladesh’s 1971 Liberation War, has faced growing criticism in recent years over alleged authoritarianism, corruption, and human rights violations under Hasina’s leadership.
(Reuters)
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Peter Burnett, Honorary Associate Professor, ANU College of Law, Australian National University
Australia’s new environment minister, Murray Watt, is reported to be a fixer. That’s good, because there’s a lot to fix.
Being environment minister is a hard gig. It often requires difficult choices between environmental and economic priorities. In cabinet, the minister is often up against a phalanx of ministers with economic portfolios and overriding political imperatives such as jobs and growth. I saw this repeatedly over the 16 years when I held senior leadership roles in environment departments at territory and federal levels.
In Labor’s first term, this tension played out again. Former environment minister Tanya Plibersek came to the role with big ideas. To that end, she tried to make Australia’s national environment laws fit for purpose and introduce a federal environmental protection agency (EPA).
A cumbersome approach to consultation didn’t help, but ultimately it was development concerns led by big mining companies and West Australian Premier Roger Cook that saw the reform can kicked down the road. Perversely, the only legal reform we saw was an amendment to protect not a threatened species, but the salmon farms threatening it.
Now it’s Watt’s turn. He has a reputation for getting things done and may drive a bargain to get some version of the EPA through. But that’s only one piece of the reform jigsaw and he’ll have to return to the mammoth task of reforming Australia’s national environment laws. He will have to push back against efforts by the Greens in the Senate to broaden the agenda to include climate and forests, and weather opposing pressures from industry and environment groups.
Watt’s largest challenge will be to revive the stalled Nature Positive Plan. This was the government’s response to the 2020 Samuel Review, which found Australia’s natural environment and iconic places were declining and under increasing threat, while national environmental laws were no longer fit for purpose.
Samuel’s solution was groundbreaking: create new, legally enforceable national environmental standards to deliver better environmental protection. Last term, Labor committed to introducing the standards, reforming laws and introducing an EPA. Unfortunately, Plibersek ran out of time and most of the reforms were put on the backburner.
Plibersek pitched an independent EPA as a tough cop on the beat, but it wasn’t independent enough for many environmentalists.
Industry didn’t like it either. WA miners used their influence to attack the EPA for being unaccountable. Their lobbying worked and the EPA was pushed back. As one mining figure told the Australian Financial Review: “The heat [industry pressure] was no one’s first preference; it was just required because there was no other way to influence the actual policymaking.”
Miners and other big businesses are likely worried the proposed independent EPA would reduce their influence. At present, the environment minister has near-complete discretion over approvals. Much of this discretion — and the political influence associated with it — would disappear with an independent EPA making decisions based on national environmental standards.
More challenges are looming. Here are two:
Gas extraction on the North West Shelf
Watt will soon have to decide on Woodside’s application to expand gas extraction off Australia’s northwest coast. If approved, the North West Shelf Extension Project would be Australia’s largest resource project. Environmentalists hate it, describing it as a climate bomb. The WA government approved it last year.
If Watt follows the pattern of his predecessors, we can expect to see the development approved subject to numerous conditions, pitched as strict environmental safeguards. Despite such safeguards applying to operations in Australia, the real damage done by the project will be global, not local, as the gas will be burned overseas.
Murray-Darling Basin Plan
The delayed ten-year review of the Murray-Darling basin plan is due in 2026. It will reopen old wounds. The basic problem is there’s not enough water for both the environment and irrigators.
When the draft plan was first released in 2010, angry irrigators burned a copy of it. The government backpedalled furiously, eventually approving a plan with a lot less water returned to the environment. Experts say the plan hasn’t actually helped the environment.
Watt is a former agriculture minister and will have insight into both sides. But he’ll need the wisdom of Solomon to come up with a successful approach.
Making environmental headway is downright hard. The underlying problem is that politics is about trade-offs, but nature doesn’t negotiate. Nature is a system of systems, and if we take too much from it those systems begin to break down – usually irreversibly.
In previous decades, governments often dealt with environmental problems by creating national parks and World Heritage areas. If only things were still that simple.
Peter Burnett is affiliated with the Biodiversity Council, an independent expert group founded to provide evidence-based solutions to Australia’s biodiversity crisis.
– ref. It’s a hard job being environment minister. Here’s an insider’s view of the key challenges facing Murray Watt – https://theconversation.com/its-a-hard-job-being-environment-minister-heres-an-insiders-view-of-the-key-challenges-facing-murray-watt-256465
Source: Government of India
Source: Government of India (4)
In the aftermath of a tragic incident involving the consumption of spurious liquor in Punjab’s Majitha block, six individuals have been arrested in connection with the case that has claimed 14 lives and left six others hospitalised. The incident spans five villages under the Majitha block in Amritsar district, officials confirmed on Tuesday.
Deputy Inspector General (DIG) of Police, Border Range, Satinder Singh, described the situation as “deeply unfortunate,” adding, “So far, six people have been arrested, including the kingpin and local distributors involved in the supply chain.”
Providing further details, Senior Superintendent of Police (SSP) Amritsar (Rural), Maninder Singh, said that four local suppliers were arrested on Monday. Their interrogation led to the capture of Prabhjeet Singh, who played a central role in the distribution of the illicit liquor.
“During questioning, Prabhjeet Singh revealed that he had procured 50 litres of methanol from Sahib Singh—the main supplier. He then diluted it to manufacture approximately 120 litres of spurious liquor, which was distributed through four local sellers,” said SSP Singh.
Legal proceedings have been initiated under Section 105 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) and Section 61A of the Excise Act against all six accused. “We are pursuing this case with the utmost seriousness and are committed to dismantling the entire network responsible for this tragedy,” the SSP added.
Meanwhile, the civil administration and police are conducting door-to-door surveys in the affected villages to identify individuals who may have consumed the adulterated liquor and to ensure they receive prompt medical treatment.
Amritsar Deputy Commissioner Sakshi Sawhney said, “We received alarming reports from five villages late last night. Many individuals were in critical condition after consuming the liquor. Our medical teams responded swiftly and are still going house to house to check for symptoms and provide immediate care.”
Efforts are ongoing to prevent further casualties, and the administration has assured full support to the affected families. Two FIRs have been registered in the case, and raids are being conducted to uncover further links in the illicit liquor distribution chain.
(With ANI inputs)
Source: United Kingdom London Metropolitan Police
A man has been arrested in connection with a series of arson attacks.
The 21-year-old was arrested in the early hours of Tuesday, 13 May on suspicion of arson with intent to endanger life.
He remains in custody.
The arrest relates to three incidents.
On Monday, 12 May at 01:35hrs, police were alerted by the London Fire Brigade to reports of a fire at a residential address in NW5.
Officers attended the scene. Damage was caused to the property’s entrance, nobody was hurt.
As a precaution and due to the property having previous connections with a high-profile public figure, officers from the Met’s Counter Terrorism Command are leading the investigation into this fire. Enquiries are ongoing to establish what caused it.
The investigation team are also considering two other incidents – a vehicle fire in NW5 on Thursday, 8 May and a fire at the entrance of a property in N7 on Sunday, 11 May – and are investigating whether they may be linked to the fire in NW5 on 12 May.
All three fires are being treated as suspicious at this time, and enquiries remain ongoing.
Source: Government of India
Source: Government of India (4)
Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna will retire on Tuesday, marking the end of his tenure as the 51st Chief Justice of the Supreme Court.
He assumed office on November 10, 2024, and retires after serving in the apex position for six months.
Justice Khanna has formally recommended Justice Bhushan Ramkrishna Gavai, the second-most senior judge of the Supreme Court, as his successor. The recommendation was made to the Union Ministry of Law and Justice, and once accepted by President Murmu, Justice Gavai will be sworn in as the 52nd Chief Justice of India.
As per judicial tradition, Justice Khanna will sit on a ceremonial bench, alongside his successor.
The Supreme Court Bar Association is set to bid farewell to the outgoing Chief Justice in a formal ceremony, during which Justice Khanna is expected to deliver his farewell address.
Justice Gavai was elevated to the Supreme Court on May 24, 2019.
At the age of 64, he is scheduled to hold the top judicial post until November 23, 2025, when he turns 65, the retirement age for Supreme Court judges.
A native of Amravati, Maharashtra, Justice Gavai began his legal career on March 16, 1985. He trained under Raja S. Bhonsale, a former Advocate General and High Court judge. After 1990, he focussed his legal practice at the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court, with special emphasis on Constitutional and Administrative Law.
He has held several key public legal positions, including Assistant Government Pleader, Additional Public Prosecutor, and later Government Pleader and Public Prosecutor for the Nagpur Bench.
(IANS)
Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region
The Acting Chief Executive in Council today (May 13) approved the making of the Safeguarding National Security (Office for Safeguarding National Security of the Central People’s Government in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region) Regulation (the Regulation) under section 110 of the Safeguarding National Security Ordinance (SNSO) and the making of the Safeguarding National Security (Declaration of Prohibited Places) Order (the Order) by the Acting Chief Executive under section 42 of the SNSO, to provide for specific details in respect of the provisions in Chapter V of the Law of the People’s Republic of China on Safeguarding National Security in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKNSL) concerning the mandate of the Office for Safeguarding National Security of the Central People’s Government in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (OSNS), in order to fulfil the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR)’s constitutional duty to further improve the legal system and enforcement mechanisms for safeguarding national security. Both pieces of subsidiary legislation were gazetted on the same day and came into effect immediately.
National security is within the purview of the Central Authorities. Article 48 of the HKNSL provides that the Central People’s Government (CPG) shall establish in the HKSAR the OSNS, which shall perform its mandate for safeguarding national security in accordance with the law. Chapter V of the HKNSL provides for the mandate of the OSNS, including overseeing, guiding, co-ordinating with, and providing support to the HKSAR in the performance of its duties for safeguarding national security. Also, the OSNS shall, upon approval by the CPG, exercise jurisdiction over a case concerning an offence endangering national security under the HKNSL in a circumstance specified in Article 55 of the HKNSL. According to Article 61 of the HKNSL, the relevant departments of the HKSAR Government shall provide necessary facilitation and support to the OSNS in performing its mandate in accordance with the HKNSL, and shall stop any act obstructing the performance of such mandate and hold those who commit such act liable in accordance with the law. The HKSAR Government must perform its constitutional duty to enact local legislation for the better carrying into effect of the relevant provisions of the HKNSL.
Source: New South Wales – News
Today marks 25 years since the disappearance and suspected murders of an Adelaide mother and her teenage daughter, Rosemary Brown and Melissa Trussell (also known as Melissa Brown).
Major Crime detectives have released a new image of Melissa on the anniversary of her disappearance hoping to spark public interest in this particularly disturbing cold case.
Rosemary, 33, and Melissa, 15, were last seen in Blair Athol at about 2.30am on Saturday 13 May 2000.
Rosemary’s handbag was discovered later that day in Stirling Street, Northfield. It was not handed into police until 23 May 2000 after a public appeal about the missing women.
Sadly, on Sunday 2 July 2000, Rosemary’s body was discovered in mangroves at Garden Island.
Melissa has never been found and is believed to have been murdered.
Acting Detective Superintendent Andrew Macrae, Major Crime Investigation Branch, emphasised SAPOL’s ongoing commitment to solving this case, recovering Melissa’s body and bringing justice to Rosemary, Melissa and their family.
“Despite the passage of time, we remain dedicated to uncovering the truth and holding those responsible accountable. We encourage anyone with information, no matter how insignificant it may seem, to come forward. Your assistance could be crucial in helping us piece together the events surrounding this tragic incident,” he said.
Anyone with information is asked to contact Crime Stoppers on 1800 333 000 or online at www.crimestopperssa.com.au – you can remain anonymous.
A reward of up to $1,000,000 is on offer for information and assistance that leads to the conviction of those responsible for these murders.
US Senate News:
Source: United States Senator for Iowa Chuck Grassley
WASHINGTON – Senate Agriculture Committee Members Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and John Hoeven (R-N.D.) reintroduced the Federal Agriculture Risk Management Enhancement and Resilience (FARMER) Act to strengthen crop insurance and make higher levels of coverage more affordable for producers.
“A strong crop insurance program is vital to the success of America’s farming operations. Yet, when disaster strikes, many farmers find themselves without adequate coverage. By ensuring farmers have access to the coverage they need, our bill would provide certainty and help alleviate the need for costly, future ad-hoc federal assistance,” Grassley said.
Specifically, the legislation would:
Additional cosponsors include Agriculture Committee Chairman John Boozman (R-Ark.), along with Sens. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), Joni Ernst (R-Iowa), Cindy Hyde-Smith (R-Miss.), Roger Marshall (R-Kan.), Jim Justice (R-W.Va.), Deb Fischer (R-Neb.) and Jerry Moran (R-Kan.).
The legislation is supported by the American Farm Bureau Federation, American Soybean Association, American Sugarbeet Growers Association, Crop Insurance and Reinsurance Bureau, Crop Insurance Professionals Association, Farm Credit Council, Midwest Council on Agriculture, National Association of Wheat Growers, National Barley Growers Association, National Corn Growers Association, National Cotton Council, National Sunflower Association, USA Dry Pea and Lentil Council, U.S. Beet Sugar Association, U.S. Canola Association and U.S. Durum Growers Association.
Full text of the legislation can be found HERE. A one-pager can be found HERE.
-30-
Source: New Zealand Police
Police can confirm a person has died following a crash on State Highway 2 near Takapau this morning.
Emergency services were called to the two vehicle crash just before 7.30am.
One person died at the scene.
The Serious Crash Unit attended and enquiries are ongoing to determine the circumstances of the crash.
The road has since reopened.
ENDS
Issued by Police Media Centre
US Senate News:
Source: United States Senator for Kansas Roger Marshall
Washington – U.S. Senator Roger Marshall, M.D. (R-Kansas) today released the following statement on the Kansas Prisoner Review Board’s decision to grant parole to Jimmie Nelms, convicted of the 1978 murder of Kansas Highway Patrol Trooper Conroy O’Brien.
“The Kansas Prisoner Review Board’s appalling decision to grant parole to cop killer Jimmie Nelms is a grave injustice and a slap in the face to law enforcement officers who risk their lives every day to protect Kansans. As the son of El Dorado’s former Police Chief and someone who was raised just 30 miles from where Trooper O’Brien was brutally killed, this decision hits close to home and is deeply disturbing,” said Senator Marshall. “Trooper O’Brien’s family deserves justice, not the pain of seeing his killer walk free after 46 years. Parole should never be an option for those who murder our brave men and women in blue. I urge the Kansas Prisoner Review Board to review all legal avenues to reconsider this decision to ensure this murderer remains where he belongs – behind bars for the rest of his life. True justice demands nothing less.”
Source: New Zealand Police
A homicide investigation is continuing into the death of a man on 9 May, at a rural property in Parakao.
Police can today name the victim as Geoffrey Wayne Ware, aged 55, who lived at the Mangakahia Road address.
“We would like to extend our condolences to Mr Ware’s whānau and loved ones at this difficult time,” Detective Senior Sergeant Michelle Harris, from Whangarei Police, says.
A post mortem has been completed and the ‘Operation Cossar’ enquiry team is making good progress.
“We are following some strong lines of enquiry,” Detective Senior Sergeant Harris says.
“There has been an excellent response to our appeal released on Monday and I would like to acknowledge the public for their assistance.”
Police are urging anyone else with information to get in touch.
“We are particularly seeking information and sightings in the area of Mangakahia Road, Otaika Valley Road and State Highway 14 towards Whangārei, between 2pm and 8pm on Friday May 9, of a 1999 blue and silver Mitsubishi L200 ute and of a man reportedly seen walking along SH14 that afternoon and evening,” Detective Senior Sergeant Harris says.
“Our investigation team is working hard to establish what happened,” Detective Senior Sergeant Harris says. “We want to reassure the community we are doing everything we can to hold the person responsible to account.”
Anyone with information is asked to make a report online, or by calling 105.
Please quote the reference number 250509/6749.
Information can also be provided anonymously to Crime Stoppers on 0800 555 111.
ENDS
Nicole Bremner/NZ Police
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Justine Bell-James, Professor, TC Beirne School of Law, The University of Queensland
Sussan Ley has been elected Liberal leader after defeating rival Angus Taylor in a party room vote on Tuesday. Now the leadership question is settled, the hard work of rebuilding the party can begin.
In the wake of its election loss, the Coalition has foreshadowed a sweeping policy review. Where the Coalition lands on the contentious nuclear energy policy will be keenly watched.
The majority Labor government is likely to easily push legislation through the lower house. However, the Senate numbers mean Labor needs backing from either the Greens or the Coalition to pass bills into law.
So where does Ley stand on nuclear energy and other pressure points across the environment and energy portfolios? Ley’s stance on four key issues, including during her time as environment minister in the Morrison government, provides important insights.
The resounding Coalition election defeat suggest the prospects for nuclear power in Australia are now poor. But the Coalition’s nuclear policy may yet resurface, given the Nationals still support it.
During the election campaign, Ley backed the Liberals’ call for nuclear power in Australia, arguing nuclear can provide a zero-emissions option that’s needed in the shift to renewables.
In a 2023 speech, Ley suggested nuclear power had a big future in Australia, saying:
The fact is the latest technology reactors in nuclear-powered submarines in operation today don’t need to be refuelled for 30 years. And the money being invested into research and development is only going to make these new nuclear technologies even better.
Ley has also argued Australia needs to keep gas in the system for longer, rather than “trying to do everything with renewables”.
A second-term Labor government will further progress its existing energy policies, including measures to reach its target of 82% renewable energy in the the National Electricity Market by 2030.
Ley has accepted the need for a renewable energy transition, but says it should be led by nuclear power and gas.
She has suggested enormous wind turbines and large-scale solar farms are dominating the landscape in rural areas. She also claims renewable energy projects generate insurance risks because battery storage increases fire risks.
Ley has consistently voted against increasing investment in renewable energy, and is likely to seek to ensure policy addresses rising energy prices and reliability.
The Albanese government intends to complete reform of Australia’s federal environment laws, known collectively as the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act (or EPBC Act). Labor’s proposed reforms stalled in the Senate last term.
The independent review that preceded the reform, led by Graeme Samuel, was initiated by the Morrison government under Ley, who served as environment minister from 2019 to 2022.
An interim report from the Samuel review was released in July 2020. Ley seized on recommendations that suited her government’s agenda – notably, streamlining the environmental approvals process to speed up decisions on proposed developments. She vowed to start working on them even before the review was finalised, and before public comment on the draft was received.
Ley put bills to parliament in August 2020 and February 2021 seeking to amend the laws. The first sought to hand powers for environmental approvals to the states. The proposal was criticised for lacking environmental safeguards.
This prompted Ley to introduce a second bill which sought to ensure state agreements were monitored and audited. It also provided for new “national environmental standards” to guide approval decisions.
But both bills lapsed before the 2022 election after failing to secure Senate support.
National environmental standards were a key recommendation from the Samuel review, and also a centrepiece of Labor’s proposed reforms. However, Labor’s proposed standards were more robust and focused on outcomes.
The bills Labor introduced to parliament in 2024 also sought establish Australia’s first national environment protection agency to carry out compliance and enforcement. This body would have had more power than Ley’s proposed commissioner.
So while Labor’s proposed reform package was bolder, both Ley and her then Labor counterpart Tanya Plibersek’s proposals were comprised of similar ingredients. Given Ley has shown support for some elements of Labor’s reform package before, namely devolving powers to states and implementing standards, there may be some grounds for negotiation.
As environment minister, Ley welcomed the Coalition’s approval of the huge Adani coalmine in central Queensland. She also gave the green light to other coal projects. Plibersek took a similar approach to coal projects in her time as minister.
In 2021, the Federal Court found Ley, as environment minister, owed a duty of care to future generations to avoid causing climate harm through her decisions. Ley successfully appealed the ruling.
Separately, Ley has also claimed climate change is not part of the environment portfolio.
When the Coalition reflects on the resounding defeat at the election, Ley’s hard stance on climate may soften.
Ley brings a deeper understanding of nature law reform to the position of Liberal leader than her predecessor Peter Dutton. This raises the prospects for overhauling the EPBC Act this term.
However, Ley’s priority is likely to be streamlining the environmental approval process rather than increasing protections afforded to threatened species and ecosystems.
On the topic of gas playing a significant ongoing role in Australia’s energy mix, Ley will find many like minds in the Labor government.
When it comes to the energy transition, much rests on the party room decision on whether to persist with a nuclear power policy. Nevertheless, with or without nuclear, Ley’s previous statements suggest she will continue to argue against wind and solar generation energy on cost and reliability grounds.
Justine Bell-James receives funding from the Australian Research Council, the Great Barrier Reef Foundation, the Queensland Government, and the National Environmental Science Program. She is a Director of the National Environmental Law Association and a member of the Wentworth Group of Concerned Scientists.
Samantha Hepburn does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.
– ref. From nuclear to nature laws, here’s where new Liberal leader Sussan Ley stands on 4 energy and environment flashpoints – https://theconversation.com/from-nuclear-to-nature-laws-heres-where-new-liberal-leader-sussan-ley-stands-on-4-energy-and-environment-flashpoints-256106
Translation. Region: Russian Federal
Source: People’s Republic of China in Russian – People’s Republic of China in Russian –
Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News
BEIJING, May 13 (Xinhua) — The 12th Beijing International Police Equipment Expo will be held from May 14 to 17, showcasing cutting-edge technologies and latest equipment in areas such as next-generation information technology, artificial intelligence and new materials.
The exhibition will for the first time feature a dedicated intelligent unmanned systems area, showcasing law enforcement technology for use in air, land, water and underwater environments, according to a press conference held by the Ministry of Public Security (MPS) on Monday.
Also, for the first time, a new stand will be presented with equipment running on the HarmonyOS operating system, developed specifically for the needs of the police.
According to Yan Fei, an official with the Ministry of Public Security, in the context of rapid technological progress and the growing diversity of social management needs, modern police technology and equipment are conducive to enhancing the operational capabilities of law enforcement agencies and modernizing the work of public security organs.
“Public security organs are willing to make full use of the exhibition as a platform to strengthen the relationship between police agencies and enterprises, deepen the exchange of experience, and build an effective channel for technological innovation, advanced equipment, and operational capability,” Yan Fei emphasized.
Organized by the China International Economic Forum, this year’s exhibition is expected to attract Chinese enterprises as well as 30 overseas companies from 11 countries, including the United States and Canada. -0-
Source: New Zealand Police
A patched gang member has been rolled after allegedly stealing tobacco pouches from Clover Park stores on multiple occasions.
Police have been investigating concerns raised by retailers on the Dawson Road shopping strip, in relation to thefts from their stores.
Counties Manukau East Area Prevention Manager, Inspector Rakana Cook, says Police received two reports of thefts from the same shop between 9-12 May.
“Police have been making a number of enquiries after a man entered the premises and stole a pack of tobacco before threatening the store worker.
“Officers were able to quickly identify and locate the alleged offender, who is a patched member of the Killer Beez.
“As a result, Police also located a stolen bike at the address.
“We have zero tolerance for anyone who targets our business community, these people work hard to provide a service for their local community and we will continue to crack down on this type of crime.”
A 30-year-old man will appear in Manukau District Court on 19 May charged with three counts of shoplifting and one charge of threatening to kill.
ENDS.
Holly McKay/NZ Police
Source: New Zealand Police
Please attribute to Detective Inspector Haley Ryan
Hutt Valley Police are appealing for information following a serious assault at a residential address in Randwick Road, Lower Hutt.
At around 8pm last night Police were called to the address where a 50-year-old man was located in a critical condition with injuries consistent with him being assaulted.
A scene guard was put in place overnight and a scene examination will take place today.
We are working to piece together what occurred, when it occurred and identifying those who may be involved.
Residents in the Randwick Road area will see a high presence of Police over the next few days.
Police would like to hear from anyone who witnessed any suspicious activity in the Randwick Road area in the last few days. We would also like to any Randwick road residents who have CCTV or dashcam footage to help advance our enquiries.
Please contact us via 105 either online or over the phone referencing file number: 250512/6924
ENDS
Issued by Police Media Centre
Source: New South Wales – News
Police and emergency services are currently searching waters off Streaky Bay after reports of two missing people.
The alarm was raised about 11.15am this morning (Tuesday 13 May), after reports of two people missing in the water near Back Beach Road.
Eyre Western Police are at the scene and will be assisted by Water Operations Unit and local SES to conduct a search.
Further information will be provided when known.
Source: New South Wales Community and Justice
Kingston man charged with high-range drink driving
Tuesday, 13 May 2025 – 11:59 am.
A man from Kingston has been charged with high-range drink driving and had his licence disqualified for two years after he allegedly attempted to evade police at Kingston over the weekend.
As part of ongoing high visibility patrols on the roads, about 1am on Sunday police attempted to intercept a white Ford Ranger utility in the Kingston area, to conduct an alcohol and drug test on the driver.
The vehicle attempted to evade police on several occasions and was located a short time later.
The alleged driver, a 40-year-old man from Kingston, returned a blood alcohol reading of 0.159 – more than three times the legal limit.
He was arrested, instantly disqualified from driving for two years and will appear in court at a later date charged with drink driving and a number of other serious traffic offences.
“Police remind the public that drink and drug driving on our roads places obvious risks to drivers, the community, and emergency responders,” said Senior Sergeant Peter Borish.
“High range drink driving can have deadly consequences.”
Anyone who has information or dash cam or cctv vision of a white Ford Ranger utility driving in a dangerous manner at Kingston over the weekend is asked to contact Kingston Police on 131 444 and quote OR774566.
Information can also be provided anonymously through Crime Stoppers Tasmania at crimestopperstas.com.au or on 1800 333 000.
US Senate News:
Source: United States Senator for New Hampshire Jeanne Shaheen
**Annual National Small Business Week awards recognize achievements and contributions of SBA-assisted individuals and businesses**
(Manchester, NH) – U.S. Senators Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH) and Maggie Hassan (D-NH), along with U.S. Representatives Chris Pappas (NH-01) and Maggie Goodlander (NH-02), today celebrated Granite State small business owners and entrepreneurs at the Small Business Administration’s (SBA) annual National Small Business Week awards at the Manchester Historic Association’s Millyard Museum. The annual awards recognize the outstanding achievements and contributions of individuals and businesses that have been supported by the SBA. Click here to view photos from the event.
“I was glad to attend today’s ceremony to celebrate the extraordinary Granite State small businesses being recognized. At the same time, I’m very concerned by the Trump administration’s proposed budget which would eliminate so many of the programs that support these businesses dealing with tariffs and economic uncertainty,” said Senator Shaheen, a member of the U.S. Senate Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship. “We need to protect and fund SBA’s entrepreneurial development programs so that we can keep all of our small businesses robust in the state and ensure that we continue to grow and provide good jobs for the workers of New Hampshire.”
“I was grateful to join small business owners from across our state this morning to celebrate the incredible contribution that small businesses make to our communities,” said Senator Hassan. “As small businesses face rising costs and the chaos and uncertainty of ongoing tariffs, I will continue to work to support the SBA and its efforts to lower costs for New Hampshire small businesses. I applaud today’s award winners and am grateful for all of the small business owners who choose to work in New Hampshire and call our state home.”
“I want to share my heartfelt congratulations with this year’s award winners and honorees,” said Congressman Chris Pappas. “Small businesses are the backbone of our state’s economy, but they’re more than that. They make up the fabric of our state and the character of our communities. I know how challenging things can be, even in the best of times, and I will always do everything I can to support our small businesses and create an economic environment that will help our businesses grow and cut costs.”
“New Hampshire small businesses are the backbone of our communities and our economy,” said Congresswoman Goodlander, a member of the House Committee on Small Business. “This morning in Manchester, it was an honor to join the Small Business Awards Ceremony to celebrate the achievements, resilience, and innovation of incredible entrepreneurs across our state. I am proud to advocate for New Hampshire’s small businesses in Congress and to bring their voices to the Small Business Committee.”
The Granite State recipients of the 2025 Small Business Awards include:
New Hampshire Small Business Person of the Year: Dr. Tanya Lawson, Inbloom Health + Medispa, Londonderry
Veteran-Owned Small Business of the Year: Russ Collins, Home Innovations Corp., Derry
Woman-Owned Small Business of the Year: Karen Jenovese, Swim NH LLC , Concord
Financial Services Champion of the Year for NH and NE: Rick Dassatti, SCORE Granite Region, Manchester
Small Business Manufacturer of the Year: Josh Velasquez, Shire’s Naturals, Peterborough
Home-Based Business of the Year: Hailee Grisham Hampton, Hurry Slow Hat Co., Littleton
Young Entrepreneur: Sabrina MacDowell, Pampered Pup LLC, Candia
Micro-Enterprise: Bret Lincoln, Lincoln Fencing, Epping
Senator Shaheen is helping lead efforts in Congress to mitigate the harmful impacts of President Trump’s policies on small businesses and consumers. Just before President Trump took office, Shaheen introduced the Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes on Imported Goods Act which would limit the president’s ability to leverage sweeping tariffs that increase costs for consumers and families. In recent months, Shaheen has traveled across the Granite State to visit businesses including Chatila’s Bakery, C&J, DCI Furniture, Mount Cabot Maple, American Calan Inc. and NH Ball Bearings to hear directly from Granite Staters impacted by the administration’s trade war.
Source: Save The Children
The war in Gaza and Israeli authorities’ total siege on the entry of aid and goods have pushed families to take unimaginable measures to survive, says Save the Children. Without urgent action to end the siege and to allow food and medicine into Gaza, one million children are at risk of starvation, disease and ultimately death.
Save the Children staff members have received reports in recent days of families in northern Gaza resorting to desperate measures, including eating animal feed, expired flour and flour mixed with sand, out of desperation to survive.
A 30-year-old father, living in northern Gaza with his pregnant wife and two-year-old child, said:
“I don’t know how to feed my family. There’s no food. I have no choice but to eat things you would never imagine. It’s unfair. She’s weak (his daughter), constantly sick, and can’t get up. She has diarrhoea. She’s in pain from hunger. My wife is going to lose our unborn child.
“It’s desperate here – chaos. We don’t know what awaits us. No one is living a dignified life. Why is this happening to us?”
A 25-year-old mother of four in northern Gaza, whose children were receiving treatment for malnutrition at Save the Children’s healthcare clinic during the brief pause in fighting, said:
“We know what hunger feels like – we’ve tasted death. Our children are just waiting their turn to die.”
Nothing has been allowed to enter Gaza – no food, water, fuel, or medicine – since Israeli authorities imposed a total siege on 2 March 2025. Almost everyone in Gaza depends on humanitarian aid, but with supplies cut off, people have been pushed to desperate measures to survive, while trucks loaded with food sit rotting at the borders. The UN World Food Programme (WFP) and community kitchens across the strip have run out of food and been forced to halt operations.
Save the Children’s Regional Director for the Middle East, North Africa and Eastern Europe, Ahmad Alhendawi, said:
“This is a deliberate humanitarian catastrophe. Children are being starved by design, under Israeli authorities’ total siege. We have the food, we have the aid and we know how to treat malnutrition in children – what we don’t have is access. There is food, water, and medical aid ready to go, but it’s being blocked at the border while families are forced to eat animal feed and leaves, taking unimaginable and dehumanising measures to survive. This is not a crisis of supply; it’s a crisis of access. At any given moment in Gaza, a child, someone’s whole world, could be killed by bombs and bullets, starvation and disease. The international community must act now to open the crossings and deliver life-saving aid. We cannot stand by while an entire population is starved in plain sight.”
Starvation as a method of warfare is strictly prohibited under international law and is codified as a war crime. The denial of humanitarian assistance is also a violation of International Humanitarian Law.
Save the Children is running a primary healthcare centre in Deir Al-Balah providing essential services to children, mothers and families. The collapse of the pause on March 18 has made it extremely difficult for our staff to deliver nutrition services to children and families, despite the high levels of malnutrition among children under the age of five. During the month of April, we were only able to screen 574 children for acute malnutrition compared to more than 10,500 children in January during the pause. Of the children aged under two years who were screened in April, more than one in five were found to have moderate acute malnutrition or severe acute malnutrition, requiring urgent treatment.