NewzIntel.com

    • Checkout Page
    • Contact Us
    • Default Redirect Page
    • Frontpage
    • Home-2
    • Home-3
    • Lost Password
    • Member Login
    • Member LogOut
    • Member TOS Page
    • My Account
    • NewzIntel Alert Control-Panel
    • NewzIntel Latest Reports
    • Post Views Counter
    • Privacy Policy
    • Public Individual Page
    • Register
    • Subscription Plan
    • Thank You Page

Category: Justice

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Police announce more details for training in Auckland

    Source: New Zealand Police

    Police has officially signed a long-term lease in Auckland so that training courses can begin in our biggest city next month.

    “We are thrilled we have signed an agreement with Te Kunenga ki Pūrehuroa Massey University for space at their Ōtehā Auckland campus,” says Deputy Commissioner Jill Rogers. 

    “We have worked closely with Massey over the past couple of months to deliver an agreement that meet our needs and works for the University as well.

    “As part of the agreement Police has exclusive use of part of the campus, which includes multiple classrooms with capacity to seat up to 155 people, a locker room, storage space, offices, and car parks. We will also have access to gym and recreation areas, and we have a small number of dorm rooms allocated for Police staff.

    “These are high quality facilities and will be a great environment for police officers to learn and develop in.

    “Extensive planning and organisation are essential to delivering training at the new Auckland training base. We are already onsite working to get everything up and running for a range of Police courses.

    “This training space in Auckland is pivotal for running our senior courses and continuing to free up space at the Royal New Zealand Police College (RNZPC) for recruit training. Upskilling and developing our officers is an important part of maintaining a highly capable workforce to keep our communities safe.

    “This space will also enable the Tāmaki Makaurau recruit Wing 390 to start on 30 June. Wing 390 will complete the same curriculum as the recruits at RNZPC. 

    “Some elements of recruit training which cannot be completed at the campus, including tactical training and swim assessment, will be completed offsite. 

    “We know that being away from home for several months has been a deterrent for people wanting to join Police. The recruit training being based in Auckland will open the doors for a dream job that might not have been possible otherwise.  

    “Whether you’re taking your first steps into the workforce or considering a career change, the best time to apply is right now.

    “If you are ready to start your training for one of the most rewarding careers there is, visit newcops.govt.nz to apply today,” Deputy Commissioner Rogers says.

    ENDS

    Issued by Police Media Centre. 

    MIL OSI New Zealand News –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: LCQ12: Support for small and medium-sized law firms and young barristers

    Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

         Following is a question by the Hon Maggie Chan and a written reply by the Secretary for Justice, Mr Paul Lam, SC, in the Legislative Council today (May 7):
     
    Question:
     
         There are views that, as Hong Kong is the centre for international legal and dispute resolution services in the Asia-Pacific region and where the International Organization for Mediation is located, the development of the legal profession is crucial to enhancing Hong Kong’s business environment governed by the rule of law and giving full play to the unique advantages of Hong Kong’s common law. It is learnt that small and medium-sized law firms and young barristers in Hong Kong face many challenges in terms of market competition, resource allocation and professional development. Regarding the support for small and medium-sized law firms and young barristers, will the Government inform this Council:
     
    (1) whether it has currently formulated specific policies or measures to assist the professional development of small and medium-sized law firms and young barristers; if so, of the details; if not, the reasons for that;
     
    (2) whether it has assessed the effectiveness of the policies or measures mentioned in (1); if it has assessed, whether there are statistics or examples showing that such policies or measures have effectively enhanced the quality and competitiveness of the professional legal services provided by small and medium-sized law firms; and the number of small and medium-sized law firms and young barristers that have benefited so far; if it has not assessed, of the reasons for that;
     
    (3) whether it has assessed the response of the legal profession to the policies or measures mentioned in (1); what specific measures will the Government implement in the future to further support the professional development and enhance the competitiveness of small and medium-sized law firms and young barristers; and
     
    (4) whether it has formulated key performance indicators for supporting the professional development and enhancing the competitiveness of small and medium-sized law firms and young barristers; if so, of the specific details (including the indicators set); if not, the reasons for that?
     
    Reply:
     
    President, 
     
         In response to the enquiry raised by the Hon Maggie Chan, the consolidated reply is as follows:
     
         A self-regulatory regime is applied for Hong Kong’s legal profession. On the premise of fully respecting the self-regulatory regime of the legal profession, the Department of Justice (DoJ) has all along been implementing various initiatives and new policies to foster an environment conducive to the professional development of the legal sector and create opportunities for them. According to statistics from the Law Society of Hong Kong (Law Society), nearly 90 per cent of law firms in Hong Kong are sole proprietorships or consist of no more than five partners. In formulating and introducing policies, the DoJ will take into account the needs of small and medium-sized law firms.
     
         Over the years, the DoJ has devised various policies and/or measures to support the professional development of solicitors from small and medium-sized law firms and young barristers with details set out below:
     
    Understudy Programme (Civil/Prosecution Work)
     
         Launched in mid-2020, the programme aims to provide training opportunities for the less-experienced barristers and solicitors (i.e. with less than five years’ post call/admission experience) to handle civil and prosecution work of the Government in order to broaden their horizon, enrich them with valuable experience and improve their case management skills. The trainings include drafting of legal opinions, conducting legal research, observing lawyers in action in different levels of courts and various hearings, participating in hearing preparation works, acting as junior counsel to senior counsel or counsel or Government Counsel, and assisting in handling more complex cases conducted in the District Court or the Court of First Instance or magistracy cases with lengthy trials. As at March 31, 2025, a total of 297 solicitors and barristers with less than five years’ qualification participated in various civil and criminal works through the programme with satisfactory response. The DoJ has, from time to time, received expressions of interest from solicitors and barristers to participate in the programme, reflecting the continued support and participation from the sector. The DoJ will continue to review and select suitable work to provide more training opportunities to participating solicitors and barristers.
     
    Professional Exchange Programme
     
         The programme aims to facilitate the exchange of best practices between lawyers in the private sector and DoJ. Qualified private sector lawyers can apply through their law firms/chambers for attachment to DoJ; law firms/chambers interested in accepting exchange lawyers from DoJ can also contact DoJ.
     
         The feedback of participants on the programme has been positive. Participants considered that their attachment facilitated cross-fertilisation of knowledge and experience and the exchange of best practices.
     
         The programme was launched in September 2019. As of 2024-25, a total of 19 lawyers (eight lawyers in the private sector and 11 government counsel) have participated in the programme.
     
         The Professional Exchange Programme has been well-received by the legal sector since its launch. We will continue to maintain close communication with law firms/chambers to facilitate the formulation of suitable exchange arrangements; and will continue to review the implementation of the programme and make refinement in a timely manner.
     
    Secondment Programmes to Relevant International Organisations
     
         The Hong Kong Special Administrative Region has, with the support of the Central Government, made standing secondment arrangements with the Hague Conference on Private International Law and the International Institute for the Unification of Private Law, which are open to application by all qualified local legal professionals from the public and private sectors (irrespective of the size of the law firms they work in). Since the said secondment arrangements have been put in place, a total of six local barristers and solicitors from the private sector, who have worked in law firms of different sizes, have participated. The DoJ will continue to promote to the legal sector (including young legal professionals) the relevant secondment programmes.
     
    Hong Kong International Legal Talents Training Academy
     
         Capitalising on Hong Kong’s bilingual common law system and the unique strengths and advantages under the “one country, two systems” principle, the Hong Kong International Legal Talents Training Academy was launched on November 8, 2024. The Academy will make the most of Hong Kong’s bilingual common law system (in English and Chinese), as well as the international status, regularly organise different practical legal courses, seminars and international exchange initiatives, so as to promote talent exchanges in the region and beyond, and provide foreign-related legal talent training for our country, and practical training for the local solicitors and barristers (including young legal professionals) for professional development.
     
         The capacity-building programmes that the Academy will organise include the “Mainland Civil and Commercial Legal Practice Training Course 2025” from June 13 to 14, 2025, which aims to enable the local legal industry to fully understand the latest developments in civil and commercial practice in the Mainland, the procedures and practical arrangements for handling relevant cases by the Mainland courts and arbitration institutions, and to promote cooperation between local and the Mainland legal industries, so as to provide more comprehensive services to clients; and a seminar on criminal prosecution for prosecutors from the country and Association of Southeast Asian Nations member states, and local solicitors and barristers in September 2025, etc.
     
         The Academy will design and organise short-term training programmes taking into account the practical needs of small and medium-sized law firms and young barristers. By flexibly arranging the course content and format, the training programmes will address the diverse professional development needs of participants, thereby achieving more focused and effective training outcomes, and fostering the professional growth of small and medium-sized law firms and young barristers.
     
    Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area (GBA) Legal Professional Examination (GBA Examination)
     
         Since 2021, eligible Hong Kong and Macao legal practitioners may provide legal services in the nine Mainland municipalities in the GBA on certain civil and commercial matters to which Mainland laws apply (including litigation and non-litigation matters), after passing the GBA Examination and having obtained the Lawyer’s License (GBA). In September 2023, the General Office of the State Council published the revised pilot measures for Hong Kong and Macao legal practitioners to obtain Mainland practice qualifications and to practise law in the nine Mainland municipalities in the GBA (the revised pilot measures), which lowered the practice experience threshold for Hong Kong and Macao legal practitioners to enroll in the GBA Examination from five years to three years. DoJ has worked closely with the Mainland authorities and continued to keep close contact with the two legal professional bodies as well as encouraging more Hong Kong legal practitioners to enroll in the GBA Examination.
     
         There are now Hong Kong legal practitioners who are GBA lawyers taking up court cases of the nine Mainland municipalities in the GBA and appearing in court as litigation representatives, as well as taking up GBA arbitration cases, with cases being duly completed. With the benefit of the lowered practice experience threshold, from 2024, more Hong Kong and Macao legal practitioners, including young Hong Kong barristers and solicitors, would be eligible to enroll in the GBA Examination, thus obtaining dual qualification in the Mainland and Hong Kong, and be able to seize the unlimited opportunities brought by the developments in the GBA.
     
         The GBA Examination has been held four times. As at the end of March 2025, over 550 Hong Kong and Macao legal practitioners have obtained the Lawyer’s License (GBA).
     
         Hong Kong legal practitioners have responded enthusiastically towards the GBA Examination. Before September 2023, there were some legal practitioners interested in practising in the nine Mainland municipalities but were unable to enroll in the GBA Examination due to the practice experience threshold. The revised pilot measures lowered the practice experience threshold for Hong Kong and Macao legal practitioners to enroll in the GBA Examination, responded to the aspirations of young Hong Kong legal practitioners and encouraged them to participate in the construction of rule of law in the GBA.
     
    GBA Mediator Training Course of Hong Kong
     
         To promote the interface of the non-litigation dispute resolution services in the GBA and to enhance the understanding of Hong Kong mediators regarding the mediation systems in Guangdong and Macao, the DoJ held the GBA Mediator Training Course of Hong Kong on August 16, 2024. Since the number of registered participants far exceeded the maximum capacity of the event venue, the DoJ specially introduced online mode to accommodate more participants. More than 400 participants have attended the Course, including young lawyers from Hong Kong. Mediation experts from Guangdong and Macao were invited to share the respective mediation systems, culture and experience of Guangdong and Macao, as well as to explore the latest developments of cross-boundary disputes mediation in the GBA and the cultural difference and integration in mediation of the three places. The course discussed topics including the means and skills in handling cross-boundary disputes, enhancing Hong Kong lawyers’ understanding of handling cross-boundary disputes in the GBA. The DoJ will consider conducting further relevant courses as necessary in the future.
     
    The Deputy Secretary for Justice led delegations of young lawyers to visit GBA Mainland cities
     
         The Deputy Secretary for Justice led two delegations of young representatives from the legal sector to visit GBA Mainland cities, including Huizhou, Shenzhen and Foshan in September and November 2023. The visits helped young legal professionals and law students deepen their understanding of the legal systems of the GBA Mainland cities and that of the Mainland, further connect their career development with the overall national development and deepen their collaboration with the legal sector of other GBA cities, so as to jointly promote high-quality national development. Number of delegates of the two delegations exceeded 70 people, including young representatives of the Law Society and the Hong Kong Bar Association, young government counsel of the DoJ, and law students from the three law schools.
     
    Updating the Talent List
     
         The Government announced to update the Talent List to include “Legal Knowledge Engineers”. The new arrangement took effect on March 1, 2025 in response to the legal profession’s need for artificial intelligence. The introduction of “Legal Knowledge Engineers” helps improve the efficiency of legal professional services and promote high value-added development of Hong Kong’s economy and society.
     
         By developing artificial intelligence systems, “Legal Knowledge Engineers” act as a bridge between lawyers and other general programmers, developing artificial intelligence systems specifically for law firms. They can help law firms (including small and medium-sized law firms) improve work efficiency, for example, when conducting due diligence, the searching of key terms within huge volumes of documents can produce highly accurate responses within a short period of time.
     
    ROLE Stars Train-the-Leaders Programme (TTL Programme)
     
         Since the launching of the TTL Programme in November 2023, through collaboration with relevant organisations and stakeholders, three phases of courses have been developed. Young lawyers have been invited as speakers and facilitators. The DoJ enhances the law-abiding awareness of young people and the public in a holistic manner, and to increase the understanding of the rule of law principles and the legal system through the TTL Programme. Since its launch, the TTL Programme has attracted over 350 trainees, including 36 young lawyers as facilitators.
     
    DoJ i-Day
     
         The event was led by young in-house lawyers of the DoJ “DoJ Fellows” in August and September 2023, and there are plans to hold a similar open day in June 2025. The event provided young lawyers with an opportunity to meet young people who aspire to join the legal profession, and also allowed those who have not yet joined the legal sector to deepen their understanding of the legal field and the work of the DoJ. The event in 2023 attracted more than 330 trainee solicitors, trainee barristers, legal professionals, law-degree students and students from other degrees and the general public to participate.
     
         Given the nature of the work of the DoJ, the benefits of a measure or policy to society may not be entirely quantifiable, the DoJ does not possess the relevant key performance indicators on the above measures or policies in support of the professional development of solicitors from small and medium-sized law firms and young barristers. The Government will continue to introduce measures or policies at appropriate times and update existing ones from time to time to align them with the latest development of the profession.

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Possible violation of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union by the Italian Highway Code – E-000726/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    Under the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, non-discrimination is a core principle. However, for the Charter to be applicable, the measure in question must involve the implementation of EU law[1].

    In general, traffic rules remain primarily a matter of national competence, and the situation described involves a national rule, specifically Article 122(2) of the current Italian Highway Code[2].

    Accompanied driving schemes usually involve drivers below the standard minimum age for a certain driving licence category who are accompanied by an experienced driver.

    Article 4(6)(d) of Directive 2006/126/EC[3] grants Member States the discretion to lower the minimum age for certain driving privileges, however without requiring an accompanied driving scheme.

    As there are currently no EU rules on accompanied driving schemes, the national rule in question does not implement EU law and hence the Charter does not apply.

    It is the responsibility of national authorities and courts to ensure that national measures adhere to fundamental rights, potentially under Italian law or the Italian Constitution.

    That said, things will change in the future. During the recent negotiations on the upcoming fourth Driving Licence Directive, the co-legislators endorsed the Commission’s proposal to mandate an EU-wide accompanied driving scheme for Category B.

    However, they chose not to extend this obligation to Category C, leaving the implementation of the scheme optional for both Categories C and C1.

    The planned introduction of accompanied driving is expected to promote greater harmonisation across Member States in the future.

    • [1] Art. 51 (1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
    • [2] Law Decree 121/2021, as amended by Law 177/2024.
    • [3] OJ L 403, 30.12.2006, p. 18.

    MIL OSI Europe News –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Israeli settlement products: alignment of EU policies with UN resolution – P-001801/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Priority question for written answer  P-001801/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Mounir Satouri (Verts/ALE)

    On 15 January 2025, in a written response, Commissioner for Trade and Economic Security Maroš Šefčovič stated that the ‘EU positions and policies are fully aligned’ with the UN General Assembly resolution of 13 September 2024[1].

    However, this resolution, recalling the conclusions of the 19 July 2024 advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice (ICJ), calls on all states ‘to take steps towards ceasing the importation of any products originating in the Israeli settlements’.

    • 1.In light of the UN resolution and the ICJ advisory opinion, does the Commission consider that the EU’s differentiation policy – which merely renders Israeli settlement products ineligible for trade preferences under the EU-Israel Association Agreement – is aligned with paragraph 5(b) of said resolution and paragraph 278 of the aforementioned advisory opinion? And if so, on what basis?
    • 2.Does the Commission consider that Member States are violating international law by continuing to allow the trade of Israeli settlement products within the EU market?
    • 3.How does the Commission plan to move forward with the ban on Israeli settlement products?

    Submitted: 5.5.2025

    • [1] https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/E-10-2024-002150-ASW_EN.html
    Last updated: 7 May 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Waste water management and use of NRRP funds in the province of Caltanissetta: investigation into water treatment failures and suspicious financial flows – E-001303/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    Almost all the agglomerations of the province of Caltanissetta are concerned by an ongoing infringement procedure for failure to comply with the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (UWWTD)[1].

    In that province, 13 agglomerations[2] are covered by the ruling of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU)[3] that found Italy in breach of the UWWTD.

    In this regard, the replies submitted by Italy between 2022 and 2025 are under assessment and the Commission will decide in due course on the next steps to be taken.

    For three more agglomerations[4] covered by another case, the Commission decided in March 2024 to lodge an application with the CJEU[5]. In a third case[6], Italy was condemned on 31 May 2018[7] to pay a penalty payment for every six months of delay.

    In May 2022, there were still 66 non-compliant agglomerations, including Niscemi, corresponding to a penalty payment of EUR 22 562 033.

    Member States are primarily responsible for the application and correct implementation of EU law. The Commission will continue to monitor the implementation of the directive in the province of Caltanissetta in the context of the above-mentioned procedures.

    The Italian Recovery and Resilience Plan (RRP)[8] supports a number of projects on waste water to reduce the number of equivalent inhabitants residing in agglomerations non-compliant with the UWWTD[9] under investment M2C4.I4.4.

    Regarding this investment, the Commission positively assessed milestone M2C4-36 on the assignment of funding to project proposals in the context of the fifth payment request.

    The subsequent targets M2C4-37 and M2C4-38 on the reduction of number of equivalent inhabitants residing in agglomerations non-compliant with the UWWTD will be assessed after the submission of the relevant future payment requests.

    • [1] Council Directive of 21 May 1991 concerning urban waste water treatment (91/271/EEC), consolidated version, OJ L 135 30.5.1991, p. 40.
    • [2] San Cataldo Consortile, Butera, Campofranco, Delia, Gela, Marianopoli, Mazzarino, Milena, Montedoro, Serradifalco, Sommatino, Sutera, and Villalba in the framework of INFR(2014)2059. T his case covers over 600 agglomerations throughout the Italian territory.
    • [3] Judgment of the Court of 6 October 2021, Case C-668/19, European Commission v Italian Republic, ECLI:EU:C:2021:815.
    • [4] Vallelunga Pratameno, Santa Caterina Villarmosa, and Mussomeli in the framework of INFR(2017)2181. This case covers 179 agglomerations throughout the Italian territory.
    • [5] https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_24_1234. The case is currently pending (C-594/24).
    • [6] INFR(2004)2034.
    • [7] Judgment of the Court of 31 May 2018, Case C-251/17, European Commission v Italian Republic, ECLI:EU:C:2018:358.
    • [8] https://commission.europa.eu/business-economy-euro/economic-recovery/recovery-and-resilience-facility/country-pages/italys-recovery-and-resilience-plan_en
    • [9] Council Directive 91/271/EEC of 21 May 1991 concerning urban waste-water treatment, OJ L 135, 30.5.1991, p. 40-52.
    Last updated: 7 May 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Australia: Call for information – Aggravated assault – Ludmilla

    Source: Northern Territory Police and Fire Services

    The Northern Territory Police Force is calling for information in relation to a rock throwing incident in Ludmilla overnight.

    Around 10:20pm, the Joint Emergency Services Communication Centre received a report that a brick had been thrown through a rear side window of a vehicle traveling outbound on Bagot Road near the entrance to Bagot Community.

    The vehicle was carrying 4 occupants, with a woman suffering a serious injury to her eye.

    Police and St John Ambulance attended, and the woman was conveyed to Royal Darwin Hospital for treatment.

    The alleged offender is described as a male youth aged around 14-years-old. He allegedly fled with two other youths into Bagot Community.

    Patrols were conducted in the area and investigations into the identity of the offender remain ongoing.

    Detectives are urging anyone with information, particularly if you have dash-cam footage along Bagot Road yesterday evening , to contact police on 131 444, quoting reference number NTP2500047387. Anonymous reports can be made through Crime Stoppers on 1800 333 000 or via https://crimestoppersnt.com.au.

    MIL OSI News –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Security: Bethlehem Man Who Burglarized Firearms Dealers and Stole More Than 150 Guns Sentenced to 40 Months in Prison

    Source: United States Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco Firearms and Explosives (ATF)

    The Stolen Weapons Are Being Recovered by Police in Multiple States in Relation to Shootings, Other Crimes

    PHILADELPHIA – United States Attorney David Metcalf announced that Ismael Terrero-Terrero, 22, of Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, was sentenced today by United States District Court Judge Timothy J. Savage to 40 months’ imprisonment and $26,798 in restitution for multiple burglaries in which he stole more than 150 guns from licensed firearms dealers.

    The defendant was charged by indictment in January of 2024, and pleaded guilty this January to three counts of theft of firearms from a federal firearms licensee and one count of possession of a stolen firearm.

    As detailed in court filings, on April 28, 2023, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) was notified of a burglary at a Federal Firearms Licensee (FFL) in Easton, Pennsylvania. Surveillance video showed that, at approximately 2:40 a.m., the defendant used a pry bar to make entrance into the building and immediately began taking AK-style pistols and AR-style rifles from the wall. He then used the pry bar to break open three glass display cases that contained pistols, placed the guns into a bag, and exited the building with 29 stolen firearms.

    In the early morning hours of June 29, 2023, law enforcement officers were dispatched to an FFL in Catasauqua, Pennsylvania, for a report of a security alarm activation. Surveillance video showed that at approximately 1:35 a.m., the defendant and another man forced entry into the building. They broke the firearm display cases with a metal tool, took handguns from the display case and put them into a backpack. The men then exited the business and fled the scene with 44 stolen firearms.

    On August 11, 2023, at approximately 4:16 a.m., the Telford Police Department (TPD) in Telford, Pennsylvania, received a notification of a burglar alarm activation at an FFL in the borough. Approximately three minutes later, a TPD officer arrived at the location and observed a male with a duffle bag entering the passenger seat of a nearby vehicle, which immediately started to flee from the officer. The officer’s pursuit of the vehicle was terminated a short time later, consistent with TPD policy. Upon examination of the scene and review of video surveillance footage, investigators determined that the defendant and another man had forced entry into the FFL and smashed multiple display cases containing firearms. The men then loaded numerous firearms into a large bag and a rolling suitcase, leaving the store with 82 stolen firearms.

    “This defendant committed three separate burglaries, stealing an astonishing 157 firearms,” said U.S. Attorney Metcalf. “These guns have now found their way into our communities and are being recovered in shootings and other crimes from Connecticut to the Caribbean. Terrero-Terrero was actively putting guns in criminals’ hands and the repercussions will continue, at society’s expense. Public safety demands that we prevent offenders from getting their hands on guns — and punish those providing a steady stream of illegal weapons.”

    “Stolen guns are crime guns that endanger our communities,” said Eric DeGree, Special Agent in Charge of the ATF’s Philadelphia Field Division. “Ismael Terrero-Terrero burglarized three Pennsylvania gun shops, stealing more than 150 firearms connected to crimes up and down the East Coast and overseas. Working with the Montgomery County Detective Bureau, Pennsylvania State Police, local police departments, and U.S. Attorney’s Office, this far-reaching and dangerous criminal operation was ended, and the perpetrator is going to prison for years.”

    This case is part of Project Safe Neighborhoods (PSN), a program bringing together all levels of law enforcement and the communities they serve to reduce violent crime and gun violence, and to make our neighborhoods safer for everyone. On May 26, 2021, the department launched a violent crime reduction strategy strengthening PSN based on these core principles: fostering trust and legitimacy in our communities, supporting community-based organizations that help prevent violence from occurring in the first place, setting focused and strategic enforcement priorities, and measuring the results.

    The case was investigated by the ATF and is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Maureen McCartney.

    MIL Security OSI –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Australia: Inside the ACT’s Traffic Management Centre

    Source: Northern Territory Police and Fire Services

    Staff monitor traffic flow on 30 screens, from over 130 CCTV cameras across Canberra.

    In brief:

    • The ACT has a Traffic Management Centre.
    • Centre staff monitor traffic flow around the territory and make changes to traffic signals as needed.
    • This article contains more about the traffic management process.

    The ACT’s Traffic Management Centre is the nerve centre for the road network.

    For 12 hours a day, centre staff monitor traffic flow on 30 screens, from over 130 CCTV cameras.

    They make changes to traffic signals as needed. This helps reduce congestion and improve travel times for motorists.

    Staff work with a range of different people, including bus drivers and construction project managers, to do so.

    There are several major public and private construction projects underway in the city. The Centre plays an integral role in ensuring motorists, pedestrians and cyclists get where they need to safely and efficiently.

    Traffic Management Centre insights

    • Fewer people are on the roads on Mondays and Fridays.
    • Wednesdays are the busiest day on the roads.
    • Peak travel times on weekdays are from 7.30am to 9.30am and 4pm to 6pm. If you can, it’s best to try to travel outside of this time.
    • Routes into the western side of the city, including Edinburgh Avenue and Marcus Clarke Street, are particularly busy in the morning and evening peak times. Motorists are encouraged to take alternate routes where possible.

    Keeping Canberrans informed

    Hundreds of Bluetooth ‘sniffers’ on the road network also give live anonymous travel time data to the centre.

    This data is then placed on variable message signs, including on the Monaro Highway and Tuggeranong Parkway.

    They state how long it will take to get to the city via different routes.

    Centre staff are always prepared to respond and coordinate with relevant agencies in case of:

    • an accident
    • a vehicle breakdown
    • a special event
    • congestion
    • debris on the road
    • hazards related to weather.

    Stay up to date on travel changes in the city at the Built for CBR website.

    Read more like this


    Get ACT news and events delivered straight to your inbox, sign up to our email newsletter:


    MIL OSI News –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Speech at the AML Summit 2025

    Source: NZ Music Month takes to the streets

    Good morning and a warm welcome to everyone, it’s a pleasure to be here.

    Let me start by thanking AML Solutions for giving me the opportunity to speak on the 10th anniversary of the AML Summit. 

    I know you have a busy and interesting schedule to look forward to over the next couple of days.  This year’s conference theme is aptly named “The evolution of Risk”.  I understand that the presentations will focus on supporting reporting entities to understand what best-practice compliance looks like under a reformed risk-based and flexible AML/CFT system. 

    This theme is future-focused – and touches on issues I have spent a lot of time thinking about and planning for since becoming responsible for the AML/CFT portfolio in my role as Associate Minister of Justice. 

    You will likely know that last year Cabinet approved my plans for an AML/CFT reform programme.  The objectives of legislative reform are to meet the objectives this government committed to in our coalition agreement: and that is to tackle organised crime and cut red tape.

    How can New Zealand reform AML/CFT regulation to reduce burden on industry and support a common-sense approach to compliance; while still ensuring we are well placed to tackle organised crime and protect our international reputation as a trusted place to do business? 

    How do we equip ourselves to deal with new and emerging challenges and threats in this space?  How can we harness new technologies to help us fight crime more effectively and make it easier and cheaper for businesses to defend themselves against money laundering? 

    How will we ensure that we, as a country, are doing our part in this inherently global fight – in a fractious world where the nexus of organised crime and international conflicts is growing? 

    Over the last year I have taken advice and considered many of the challenges facing the sector in detail.  Many of you in this room, or online, will have been involved in and contributed to this advice.  I am so grateful for your hard work and specialist contributions.  Your expertise is invaluable – it enables robust discussion and informed decision-making. 

    Now is the time to deliver on our coalition commitments.  The Act has now been in force for 11 years and we know the current system is not delivering as well as it could for New Zealanders, businesses, or for law enforcement. 

    This is because the laws and requirements are highly complex and not sufficiently risk based.  As a result, they can be repetitive and unnecessarily burdensome.  I have heard from many New Zealanders that the requirements are confusing, obstructive, and costly.

    Some of the examples they have given me illustrate how absurd these requirements can be. I ’ve heard from mothers who’ve told me they cannot open bank accounts for their child unless they are able to prove where their child lives. I’ve heard from elderly widows, who had relied on their husbands to take care of bills and are now unable to have a bank account in their own name because they have no written proof to say they live in their own home.  These are clear indications of how the system is failing to take a properly risk-based approach.

    Multiple reviews of the current system have also identified deficiencies that make it harder for the system to effectively deter and combat the criminal activity that we know is taking place in New Zealand. 

    At New Zealand’s latest mutual evaluation, the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) reported on several strengths in the New Zealand system but also highlighted that there is room for significant improvement. 

    I know you will be aware that compliance with international standards is incredibly important for New Zealand’s global reputation and financial standing.  We know that FATF recommendations are now tougher, and that there are still many actions from our last evaluation that we need to address.  Regulatory reform is needed to ensure we do well at our next evaluation. 

    But let’s not belabour what we already know about the deficiencies. Let’s instead focus on opportunities for the future and what we can achieve through this reform programme.  To me, reform presents a great opportunity to enhance the strengths of our system, and to address identified concerns. 

    We know, for example, that the wider Financial Crime Group do excellent work, especially relating to asset recovery.  We only need to cast our eyes to very recent news stories – I’m thinking of the announcement last September of the highly successful operation against the Comanchero gang which saw $5.8 million worth of assets restrained – to know law enforcement across the system is working hard and achieving remarkable successes through their work.  A look at the latest Police annual report shows that over $72 million of assets were restrained from organised and financial crime, and 379 money laundering investigations resulted in prosecution.

    We also know there is sound domestic cooperation and coordination on monitoring possible terrorist financing – the FATF told us so, at our latest mutual evaluation. 

    The FATF have also noted that we are known internationally for our high-quality responsiveness to cooperation requests. 

    In other words, New Zealand already does lots of things well.  Our focus is therefore on improving the AML/CFT system to enhance these strengths.  Let’s enable the system and its actors to achieve the intended outcomes: to detect and deter money laundering and terrorism financing.

    This Government is about quality regulation.  We want regulation that achieves intended outcomes, regulation that makes sense and is workable for all.  This means getting rid of unnecessary red-tape– if regulation isn’t providing the results we are after, there is no point to it. 

    In the case of the AML/CFT system, regulation needs to contribute to the fundamental purpose of the system: tackling crime.  To do that effectively, we need an agile, streamlined system that is laser focussed on real risk. 

    A truly risk-based system will better enable law enforcement to crack down on organised crime by providing the financial intelligence needed to go after criminal organisations.  A truly risk-based system is more aligned with international obligations and standards.  A truly risk-based system will provide regulatory relief for lower risk businesses and the public.

    My reform programme, therefore, will be undertaken in three parts.  The first phase is already well-advanced and will deliver immediate regulatory relief via two bills – the first, the Statutes Amendment Bill, has already been reported back from Select Committee to the House of Representatives, and is likely to come into effect in the coming months.  The second, the Anti-Money Laundering and Countering Terrorism Financing Amendment Bill, is currently before select committee. 

    The changes made through these bills include removing both address verification requirements for many customers, and relaxing enhanced customer due diligence requirements for lower-risk trusts.  This will help make it easier for mums and dads to set up bank accounts for their kids, and easier for vulnerable kiwis – including the elderly – to get access to essential financial services. 

    This first set of reforms aims to make immediate changes, to make the AML/CFT system more risk-based and ease the regulatory burden on businesses.

    These changes alone already represent the most significant regulatory relief in the history of the AML/CFT regime.  But we do not intend to stop there.

    The second phase of changes focuses on structural reforms for the regime. Cabinet has agreed that, as part of these structural reforms, we will be implementing a single AML/CFT supervisor structure within the Department of Internal Affairs.  This will replace the current three-supervisor model. 

    This move will create a more efficient, effective, and risk-based supervisory structure – one that reduces unnecessary compliance costs for lower-risk businesses and transactions, removes the need for multi-supervisor coordination efforts – thereby reducing costs – and streamlines decision-making.

    A single supervisor can be more resource responsive to the ever-changing risk environment.  A single supervisor will be better able to deliver consistent and timely guidance to support reporting entities. 

    This will help to ensure that businesses have the confidence to take a more flexible approach to implementing their AML/CFT obligations and lower the barrier to accessing financial services for low-risk customers. 

    A single supervisor with overview of the wider AML/CFT environment will also be better able to look for and realise opportunities as they arise.  For example, I’m sure we all agree that there are opportunities and benefits to be gained in the digital identity and open banking areas.  In addition, the emergence of AI could herald improved, and more cost effective, electronic Know Your Customer (eKYC) functions, risk assessments, and suspicious activity reporting.

    Everyone here will be aware that in a world of increasing demands, the AML/CFT system in New Zealand is currently underfunded.  My phase two structural reforms will also see us work towards introducing a sustainable funding model for the system. 

    The new hybrid funding model will establish an industry-levy.  I will ensure that this levy is designed in a way that distributes the costs in a risk appropriate and equitable way, so that it targets the highest risk sectors – such as large international banks – and does not place an undue burden on small businesses. 

    This hybrid funding model will provide sufficient resourcing for core regulatory functions and deliver substantial savings to the Crown.  This approach is in line with what has been done in other like-minded jurisdictions, like Australia, the United Kingdom and Canada.

    As part of the work on the funding model, a work programme and a National Strategy will be developed in partnership with industry and agreed by Cabinet to ensure that the system is focussed on industry priorities.  Any changes to the levy will also need to be informed by the AML/CFT National Strategy. 

    Now, I know that many of you in this room will have opinions and views on the approach we have taken to these structural reforms.  I look forward to engaging with you and drawing on your sector expertise as we get stuck into the detail of this change process.

    The structural changes in phase two of my reforms will result in an amendment Bill that I aim to have introduced by the middle of this year.  Officials are currently working on the details of developing and implementing the levy, but I expect that the earliest it would be in place is by 2027.

    The third phase of these reforms will deliver wider legislative changes to implement international standards outlined by the FATF.  This Bill will be introduced later in this Parliamentary term.

    Doing this international compliance work will have a natural flow on effect that improves New Zealand entities’ ability to carry on with business and sharpens our law enforcement tools.  Importantly, it includes amendments to provide further flexibility for businesses to take a more risk-based approach to their AML/CFT obligations.

    The work programme was designed to address specific areas that were identified through robust stakeholder consultation during the 2022 Statutory Review of the AML/CFT Act and further targeted engagement has been undertaken since then.

    I am aware there is room for improvement in other areas as well – and some of you may be disappointed that more statutory reforms are not currently being progressed. 

    In arriving at my current statutory reform programme, I have taken a pragmatic approach – the current fiscal environment dictates that we are smart and outcomes-focused with our reforms.  Right now, this means prioritising the changes that will give us the biggest bang for our buck in terms of regulatory relief, while ensuring compliance with international expectations and supporting law enforcement to tackle organised crime and delivering regulatory relief. 

    We need to prioritise this legislative work programme first to ensure that changes to the law are made and the system is properly set up to take a risk-based approach in time for our next mutual evaluation in 2028.  I am excited and proud that this reform programme is on track to deliver the most significant regulatory relief since the Act came into force in 2013.

    But, like you, I want to do more, if I can.  I am committed to look for opportunities to do just that, not only through reforms to legislation, but also through considering potential exemptions and regulations that will support a more risk-based AML/CFT system.

    I look forward to working with you all as we move forward with all the parts of this reform programme.  To me, the key to successfully strengthening the AML/CFT system through these reforms is collaboration and leveraging expertise in the sector. 

    I encourage you all to participate in consultation when these opportunities come up.  We need people with experience and knowledge to get involved – we need you.  I look forward to hearing your views on how we can make the laws work for you. 

    Thank you for having me today, it’s a pleasure to be here with you all.  Enjoy your time here at the conference.

    MIL OSI New Zealand News –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Parliament Hansard Report – Wildlife (Authorisations) Amendment Bill — In Committee—Part 2 – 001468

    Source: Govt’s austerity Budget to cause real harm in communities

    Hon PRIYANCA RADHAKRISHNAN (Labour): Thank you, Madam Chair. I do want to just begin by emphasising the need, as Rachel Brooking has pointed out, for a review period. Because what we see in Schedule 1AA refers to, potentially, a large number of projects, perhaps some that are active authorisations, some that are under way, and it is important, given the retrospectivity of this, that there is a review period.

    The second point that I want to make, and a question for the Minister, is about the number of those projects. Now, we’ve seen, as I’ve mentioned previously in this debate, that there is no regulatory impact statement; there is no proactively released Cabinet paper. So we don’t have a huge amount of detail that, previously or in other situations, were this not being passed through all stages under urgency, we would have had access to. I have seen some media reporting that basically says that in the past 12 months, the Department of Conservation (DOC) has granted 85 similar permits to project applicants, and that, in total, 315 applications are under way where a section 53 permit or authority could be granted. So my question would be whether the Minister can confirm those figures, and also whether new Schedule 1AA in Part 2 would then apply to all of those—the 85 plus the 315 that are in train as well.

    The third point that I want to make is in lieu of a select committee process, all we have—previously we would have submitters, many of whom have done a fair bit of work in this space in terms of reviewing the Wildlife Act and making suggestions on what should be changed within the Act. We would have ordinarily heard from them through a select committee process; we, of course, haven’t, given that we are sitting in urgency, and so all we have to go on are some of the press releases that have been put out on this particular piece of legislation. And I do want to check: there is one from the Environmental Law Initiative—of course, the lawyers who judicially reviewed the decision have said that, basically, it increases the burden on those who are, I guess, pushing those projects through—the 85 and the 315, if, in fact those numbers are correct. And I would be keen for the Minister’s view, given what’s in Schedule 1AA, on whether he agrees that it actually does increase the administrative burden both for DOC but also in terms of the legal tests that now those projects have to be put against.

    There was also another comment, and I can’t find it in front of me at the moment, around the fact that, potentially, what DOC should have done—and, again, it’s just been two months since the High Court ruling; that is a point that has been made before: there hasn’t been a huge amount of time. Had this been either delayed a little bit or had there been a slightly lengthier process, or some select committee process, there potentially could have been time for DOC to then go through the cases, on a case by case basis. We are here because the High Court ruling ruled that in that particular case, the Mt Messenger Bypass case, the authority that was given under section 53 didn’t actually meet the purpose of the Wildlife Act as it was written back in 1953, and, therefore, just this carte blanche approach to now changing the law to change, ostensibly, the purpose of this Act so that the permits that were given retrospectively will now be legal does not necessarily mean that those who are shepherding those projects through have taken reasonable steps to protect biodiversity.

    So there is an argument put forward that what DOC should be doing is to look at those 85 cases where there is legal uncertainty and try and work out whether reasonable steps have been taken to protect biodiversity in each of those cases. And I would really like to know what the Minister’s view on that is, but, also, what advice he received on that point: is that something that DOC could actually have done? Was there consideration around the time period that it would have taken for DOC to be able to go through all of those cases on a case by case basis?

    MIL OSI New Zealand News –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Parliament Hansard Report – Tuesday, 6 May 2025 (continued on Thursday, 8 May 2025) – Volume 783 – 001469

    Source: Govt’s austerity Budget to cause real harm in communities

    Hon PRIYANCA RADHAKRISHNAN (Labour): Thank you, Madam Chair. I do want to just begin by emphasising the need, as Rachel Brooking has pointed out, for a review period. Because what we see in Schedule 1AA refers to, potentially, a large number of projects, perhaps some that are active authorisations, some that are under way, and it is important, given the retrospectivity of this, that there is a review period.

    The second point that I want to make, and a question for the Minister, is about the number of those projects. Now, we’ve seen, as I’ve mentioned previously in this debate, that there is no regulatory impact statement; there is no proactively released Cabinet paper. So we don’t have a huge amount of detail that, previously or in other situations, were this not being passed through all stages under urgency, we would have had access to. I have seen some media reporting that basically says that in the past 12 months, the Department of Conservation (DOC) has granted 85 similar permits to project applicants, and that, in total, 315 applications are under way where a section 53 permit or authority could be granted. So my question would be whether the Minister can confirm those figures, and also whether new Schedule 1AA in Part 2 would then apply to all of those—the 85 plus the 315 that are in train as well.

    The third point that I want to make is in lieu of a select committee process, all we have—previously we would have submitters, many of whom have done a fair bit of work in this space in terms of reviewing the Wildlife Act and making suggestions on what should be changed within the Act. We would have ordinarily heard from them through a select committee process; we, of course, haven’t, given that we are sitting in urgency, and so all we have to go on are some of the press releases that have been put out on this particular piece of legislation. And I do want to check: there is one from the Environmental Law Initiative—of course, the lawyers who judicially reviewed the decision have said that, basically, it increases the burden on those who are, I guess, pushing those projects through—the 85 and the 315, if, in fact those numbers are correct. And I would be keen for the Minister’s view, given what’s in Schedule 1AA, on whether he agrees that it actually does increase the administrative burden both for DOC but also in terms of the legal tests that now those projects have to be put against.

    There was also another comment, and I can’t find it in front of me at the moment, around the fact that, potentially, what DOC should have done—and, again, it’s just been two months since the High Court ruling; that is a point that has been made before: there hasn’t been a huge amount of time. Had this been either delayed a little bit or had there been a slightly lengthier process, or some select committee process, there potentially could have been time for DOC to then go through the cases, on a case by case basis. We are here because the High Court ruling ruled that in that particular case, the Mt Messenger Bypass case, the authority that was given under section 53 didn’t actually meet the purpose of the Wildlife Act as it was written back in 1953, and, therefore, just this carte blanche approach to now changing the law to change, ostensibly, the purpose of this Act so that the permits that were given retrospectively will now be legal does not necessarily mean that those who are shepherding those projects through have taken reasonable steps to protect biodiversity.

    So there is an argument put forward that what DOC should be doing is to look at those 85 cases where there is legal uncertainty and try and work out whether reasonable steps have been taken to protect biodiversity in each of those cases. And I would really like to know what the Minister’s view on that is, but, also, what advice he received on that point: is that something that DOC could actually have done? Was there consideration around the time period that it would have taken for DOC to be able to go through all of those cases on a case by case basis?

    MIL OSI New Zealand News –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Name release: Fatal crash, Mangakino

    Source: New Zealand Police

    Police can now release the name of the woman who died following a crash on Waipapa Road, Mangakino on 21 April.

    She was 64-year-old Woonkyung Lee, from the Republic of Korea.

    Our thoughts are with her close ones at this difficult time.

    ENDS

    Issued by Police Media Centre 

    MIL OSI New Zealand News –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Manurewa homicide: Name release

    Source: New Zealand Police

    Police can today release the name of the man who died at a property in Manurewa on Tuesday.

    He was 30-year-old Selwyn Tetoko Hori Robson, of Auckland.

    Detective Inspector Shaun Vickers says: “A 32-year-old woman has been remanded in custody to appear in the Auckland High Court on 28 May charged with Mr Robson’s murder.

    “Police extend our thoughts to Mr Robson’s whānau and friends at this difficult time.”

    ENDS.

    Holly McKay/NZ Police

    MIL OSI New Zealand News –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Name release: Fatal crash, Temple View

    Source: New Zealand Police

    Police can now release the name of the woman who died in a crash in Temple View on 16 April.

    She was 32-year-old Kerri David, from Melville, Hamilton.

    Our thoughts are with those close to her at this time.

    Enquiries to determine the circumstances of the crash are ongoing.

    ENDS

    Issued by Police Media Centre

    MIL OSI New Zealand News –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Gillibrand Sounds Alarm About Trump Administration’s Decision To Terminate Program That Helps Prevent Opioid Overdoses

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for New York Kirsten Gillibrand
    In 2024, This Program Distributed Over 280,000 Kits Containing The Opioid Overdose Reversal Medication Naloxone – Often Known As Narcan
    New York Law Enforcement Has Administered Naloxone Over 12,000 Times Since The Program Began In 2014
    Gillibrand: ”Terminating A Proven Tool Without Clear, Transparent Justification Places Countless Lives At Needless Risk”
    U.S. Senator Kirsten Gillibrand is condemning the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ (HHS) plans to terminate a program that distributes and provides training to administer the opioid overdose reversal medication naloxone. The program in jeopardy provides $56 million annually under the First Responders-Comprehensive Addiction and Recovery Act for the distribution of naloxone to law enforcement, community-based organizations, and tribes across the country. If terminated, first responders and organizations will lose a highly effective resource that has saved thousands of lives.
    “With the ongoing challenges posed by the opioid crisis, it is critical that the federal government’s actions are guided by public health expertise and a commitment to sustaining the momentum behind federal policy and funding that is working,” said Senator Gillibrand. “It is imperative that HHS’s actions support, rather than undermine, local efforts by municipalities and first responders to respond. Terminating a proven tool without clear, transparent justification places countless lives at needless risk. Our communities will bear the cost: in lives lost, in families broken, and in public trust further eroded.”
    Gillibrand called on HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to answer the following questions to ensure that the agency has a clear understanding of the dangers of terminating this funding:
    Provide a detailed explanation for how the Administration intends to sustain investments in opioid overdose mitigation strategies that support and equip first responders?
    If funding for this program is being reallocated, what new initiatives or priorities will those resources support?

    Has HHS consulted with any stakeholders before planning to terminate this program? Please detail how HHS has solicited feedback from the following groups:
    First responders;
    Public health officials, including state and local officials;
    Medical professionals, including substance use disorder treatment professionals.

    How does HHS plan to address the potential disproportionate impact on medically underserved and rural communities who depend on well-equipped first responders for medical emergencies?
    Has HHS conducted an analysis of the potential public health impact, particularly on overdose survival rates, resulting from the termination of this program? If so, please provide any analysis done.
    A full copy of Senator Gillibrand’s letter can be found here and below.
    Dear Secretary Kennedy,
    I write to express profound concern regarding reports that the administration is planning to terminate a $56 million annual grant program under the First Responders-Comprehensive Addiction and Recovery Act that distributes and provides training to administer the opioid overdose reversal medication, naloxone. If terminated, first responders would lose a highly effective resource that can help save countless lives.
    In 2024 alone, this critical program distributed more than 282,500 naloxone kits to cities, community-based organizations, and tribes across the country. Opioid-related overdoses and deaths in the United States have fallen to their lowest since 2020, due in part to the wider availability of naloxone and its distribution to first responders underscoring how impactful treatment programs like this are in saving lives and combatting the opioid crisis. From 2020 to July 2022, New York State law enforcement personnel administered naloxone an average of 141 times a month. Put another way, every five hours, one New Yorker had a trained, well-equipped first responder to thank for saving their life.
    The long-term successes of this funding support cannot be overstated; by Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration’s (SAMHSA) own accounting, more than 150,000 first responders have undergone naloxone training, and more than 90,000 overdoses have been reversed since 2017. Opioid deaths are preventable and every additional first responder trained and equipped in New York, especially in medically underserved communities, has been a game changer.
    With the ongoing challenges posed by the opioid crisis, it is critical that the federal government’s actions are guided by public health expertise and a commitment to sustaining the momentum behind federal policy and funding that is working. It is imperative that HHS’s actions support, rather than undermine, local efforts by municipalities and first responders to respond. Terminating a proven tool without clear, transparent justification places countless lives at needless risk. Our communities will bear the cost: in lives lost, in families broken, and in public trust further eroded.
    Given the public good SAMHSA naloxone distribution and training grant programs provide, and the clear dangers of unilaterally terminating this funding, I request a written response to the following inquiries by May 16, 2025:
    Provide a detailed explanation for how the Administration intends to sustain investments in opioid overdose mitigation strategies that support and equip first responders?
    If funding for this program is being reallocated, what new initiatives or priorities will those resources support?

    Has HHS consulted with any stakeholders before planning to terminate this program? Please detail how HHS has solicited feedback from the following groups:
    First responders;
    Public health officials, including state and local officials;
    Medical professionals, including substance use disorder treatment professionals.

    How does HHS plan to address the potential disproportionate impact on medically underserved and rural communities who depend on well-equipped first responders for medical emergencies?
    Has HHS conducted an analysis of the potential public health impact, particularly on overdose survival rates, resulting from the termination of this program? If so, please provide any analysis done.
    Thank you for your attention to this matter and I look forward to hearing from you.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: ICE, multiagency taskforce investigation results in 5 illegal aliens charged in human smuggling event leaving at least 3 dead

    Source: US Immigration and Customs Enforcement

    SAN DIEGO – Two complaints were filed in federal court May 6 charging five people with participating in a human smuggling event that led to the deaths of at least three migrants, including a 14-year-old Indian boy. His 10-year-old sister is still missing at sea and presumed dead; their father is in a coma and mother is also hospitalized. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement– Marine Task Force, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, United States Coast Guard, San Diego Lifeguard Service and San Diego County Medical Examiner’s Office are investigating this case.

    “Human smuggling, regardless of the route, is not only illegal but extremely dangerous. Smugglers often treat people as disposable commodities, leading to tragic and sometimes deadly consequences, as we saw in this case,” said ICE Homeland Security Investigations San Diego Special Agent in Charge Shawn Gibson. “Yesterday’s heartbreaking events are a stark reminder of the urgent need to dismantle these criminal networks driven by greed. HSI along with the U.S. Border Patrol, U.S. Coast Guard, and other partners from the Marine Task Force, remains firmly committed to holding those responsible accountable for these senseless deaths.”

    According to court records, on May 5, witnesses observed an overturned panga boat at a beach in Del Mar, California. Bystanders and San Diego lifeguards participated in rescue efforts. Law enforcement officials recovered three bodies, including the boy, identified in court records as P.P.B. Four other migrants were rescued and hospitalized, including P.P.B.’s mother and father; nine others were initially unaccounted for.

    Mexican nationals Julio Cesar Zuniga Luna, 30, and Jesus Juan Rodriguez Leyva, 36, believed to be involved in the smuggling event were taken into custody at the time of the incident. They have been charged with bringing in aliens resulting in death and bringing in aliens for financial gain.

    Border Patrol agents conducting operations in Chula Vista, California identified a vehicle that had been observed at the scene of the maritime smuggling incident earlier that day. The vehicle driver fled the scene before an arrest could be made. During the investigation, Border Patrol Agents identified two other vehicles involved in the smuggling event. They were able to successfully arrest the drivers of the load vehicle, and locate eight of the nine migrants missing from the boat, except for P.P.B.’s 10-year-old sister.

    Melissa Jenelle Cota, 33, Gustavo Lara, 32 and Sergio Rojas-Fregosa, 31, – all Mexican nationals – were arrested and charged with transportation of illegal aliens. Rojas-Fregoso, was identified as an alien who had previously been deported on Dec. 19, 2023.

    “The drowning deaths of these children are a heartbreaking reminder of how little human traffickers care about the costs of their deadly business,” said U.S. Attorney Adam Gordon. “We are committed to seeking justice for these vulnerable victims, and to holding accountable any traffickers responsible for their deaths.”

    The charges and allegations contained in an indictment or complaint are merely accusations, and the defendants are considered innocent unless and until proven guilty.

    This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Sean Van Demark and Edward Chang.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: New York Man Charged with Federal Hate Crimes After Repeatedly Assaulting Jewish Victims

    Source: US State of California

    An indictment was unsealed today in the Southern District of New York charging Tarek Bazrouk 20, of New York, New York, with three counts of committing hate crimes in connection with his repeated assaults of Jewish victims in New York City between 2024 and 2025. Bazrouk was arrested this morning and will be presented later today before U.S. Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron. The case is assigned to U.S. District Judge Richard M. Berman.

    “The Civil Rights Division will continue to relentlessly pursue allegations of antisemitic violence and will not stop until justice is served for the victims and their families,” said Assistant Attorney General Harmeet K. Dhillon of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division. “Under Attorney General Pam Bondi’s leadership, we will use all available resources to investigate and charge those who target and assault others because of their faith.”

    “As alleged, on three separate occasions, Tarek Bazrouk deliberately targeted and assaulted Jewish victims at protests relating to the Israel/Gaza war,” said U.S. Attorney Jay Clayton for the Southern District of New York. “Despite being arrested after each incident, Bazrouk allegedly remained undeterred and quickly returned to using violence to target Jews in New York City. This Office is dedicated to seeking justice for victims of hate crimes and will aggressively prosecute those who spread bigotry and discrimination through violence.”

    According to court documents, other public filings, and statements previously made on the record in this case, over the course of approximately nine months, Bazrouk physically assaulted three Jewish individuals at protests concerning the Israel/Gaza war. First, on April 15, 2024, Bazrouk — while wearing a green headband typically worn by Hamas terrorists — attended a protest concerning the Israel/Gaza war in Lower Manhattan, outside the New York Stock Exchange.  During the protest, Bazrouk was arrested by officers from the New York City Police Department (NYPD) after lunging at a group of pro-Israel protestors. As Bazrouk was being escorted to an NYPD vehicle, Bazrouk kicked a different individual — Victim-1, a Jewish college student — in the stomach. At the time of the assault, Victim-1 was standing near other Jewish protestors, who were wearing kippahs (that is, brimless skullcaps traditionally worn by Jewish men), carrying Israeli flags, and singing Jewish songs.

    Approximately eight months later, on Dec. 9, 2024, Bazrouk assaulted another individual at a protest relating to the Israel/Gaza war next to a university campus in upper Manhattan. The victim of the second assault — Victim-2 — is a Jewish student who attended the nearby university. On the date of the assault, Victim-2 and his brother were wearing kippahs, Victim-2 had an Israeli flag draped around his shoulders, and Victim-2 was singing Jewish songs. As the protest continued, Bazrouk — with his mouth covered — stole an Israeli flag from Victim-2’s brother and fled. After Victim-2 and his brother followed Bazrouk through a crowd to retrieve the flag, Bazrouk snuck up beside Victim-2 and struck him in the face with a closed fist.

    Roughly one month later, on Jan. 6, 2025, Bazrouk assaulted a third Jewish victim — Victim-3 — at a protest concerning the Israel/Gaza war near 1st Avenue and East 18th Street in Manhattan. At this protest, Victim-3 was wearing an Israeli flag around his shoulders, a hat with an Israeli flag, and a chain with a Jewish star. During the protest, Bazrouk, who was wearing a keffiyeh on his face, made contact with Victim-3’s shoulder and wrapped his foot around Victim-3’s ankle.  Victim-3 attempted to push BAZROUK away and cursed at him. Bazrouk then punched Victim-3 in the nose with a closed fist.

    “Over the course of nine months, Tarek Bazrouk allegedly targeted and violently attacked multiple Jewish victims in a series of physical assaults, while demonstrating a pattern of supporting anti-Semitic terrorist organizations,” said Assistant Director in Charge Christopher G. Raia of the FBI New York Field Office. “These alleged hate crimes not only violated the victims’ ability to exercise their first amendment rights, but also intimidated and sparked fear among a broader population. The FBI won’t tolerate this behavior and will apprehend any individual who commits a federal crime seeking to harm others for their religious beliefs.”

    “As alleged, Tarek Bazrouk deliberately set out to harm Jewish New Yorkers — targeting them at protests, singling them out, and assaulting them for nothing more than their identity,” said NYPD Commissioner Jessica S. Tisch. “The NYPD worked closely with the FBI and the U.S. Attorney’s Office to track him down and ensure he faces real consequences. Antisemitism and all forms of bigotry have no home here in New York — period. New Yorkers of all faiths are welcome to live and worship in our city freely, and we will never stop fighting to protect that right.”

    According to court documents, pursuant to judicially authorized warrants, law enforcement subsequently searched a cellphone used by Bazrouk. Evidence from that device revealed Bazrouk’s anti-Semitic bias and his support for anti-Jewish terrorist groups including Hamas, demonstrating his motivation for repeatedly assaulting Jewish victims. In text messages, for example, Bazrouk identified himself as a “Jew hater,” labeled Jews as “worthless,” extorted “Allah” to “get us rid of [Jews],” called an acquittance a “Fucking Jew,” and told a friend to “slap that bitch” in reference to a woman with an Israeli sticker on her laptop. Bazrouk also told a friend that he was “mad happy” to have learned that certain of his family members overseas are part of Hamas. Bazrouk’s phone was also littered with pro-Hamas and pro-Hizballah propaganda, showing his support for organizations that have murdered thousands of Jews and Israelis.

    Bazrouk is charged with three counts of committing hate crimes, each of which carries a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison.

    The maximum potential penalties in this case are prescribed by Congress and are provided here for informational purposes only, as any sentencing of the defendant will be determined by the judge.

    U.S. Attorney Jay Clayton for the Southern District of New York praised the outstanding investigative work of the FBI and thanked the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office and the NYPD for their assistance.

    The prosecution of this case is being handled by the Office’s Civil Rights Unit in the Criminal Division. Assistant U.S. Attorneys Sam Adelsberg and Jim Ligtenberg for the Southern District of New York are in charge of the prosecution.

    An indictment is merely an allegation. All defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.   

    MIL OSI USA News –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Security: New York Man Charged with Federal Hate Crimes After Repeatedly Assaulting Jewish Victims

    Source: United States Attorneys General

    An indictment was unsealed today in the Southern District of New York charging Tarek Bazrouk 20, of New York, New York, with three counts of committing hate crimes in connection with his repeated assaults of Jewish victims in New York City between 2024 and 2025. Bazrouk was arrested this morning and will be presented later today before U.S. Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron. The case is assigned to U.S. District Judge Richard M. Berman.

    “The Civil Rights Division will continue to relentlessly pursue allegations of antisemitic violence and will not stop until justice is served for the victims and their families,” said Assistant Attorney General Harmeet K. Dhillon of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division. “Under Attorney General Pam Bondi’s leadership, we will use all available resources to investigate and charge those who target and assault others because of their faith.”

    “As alleged, on three separate occasions, Tarek Bazrouk deliberately targeted and assaulted Jewish victims at protests relating to the Israel/Gaza war,” said U.S. Attorney Jay Clayton for the Southern District of New York. “Despite being arrested after each incident, Bazrouk allegedly remained undeterred and quickly returned to using violence to target Jews in New York City. This Office is dedicated to seeking justice for victims of hate crimes and will aggressively prosecute those who spread bigotry and discrimination through violence.”

    According to court documents, other public filings, and statements previously made on the record in this case, over the course of approximately nine months, Bazrouk physically assaulted three Jewish individuals at protests concerning the Israel/Gaza war. First, on April 15, 2024, Bazrouk — while wearing a green headband typically worn by Hamas terrorists — attended a protest concerning the Israel/Gaza war in Lower Manhattan, outside the New York Stock Exchange.  During the protest, Bazrouk was arrested by officers from the New York City Police Department (NYPD) after lunging at a group of pro-Israel protestors. As Bazrouk was being escorted to an NYPD vehicle, Bazrouk kicked a different individual — Victim-1, a Jewish college student — in the stomach. At the time of the assault, Victim-1 was standing near other Jewish protestors, who were wearing kippahs (that is, brimless skullcaps traditionally worn by Jewish men), carrying Israeli flags, and singing Jewish songs.

    Approximately eight months later, on Dec. 9, 2024, Bazrouk assaulted another individual at a protest relating to the Israel/Gaza war next to a university campus in upper Manhattan. The victim of the second assault — Victim-2 — is a Jewish student who attended the nearby university. On the date of the assault, Victim-2 and his brother were wearing kippahs, Victim-2 had an Israeli flag draped around his shoulders, and Victim-2 was singing Jewish songs. As the protest continued, Bazrouk — with his mouth covered — stole an Israeli flag from Victim-2’s brother and fled. After Victim-2 and his brother followed Bazrouk through a crowd to retrieve the flag, Bazrouk snuck up beside Victim-2 and struck him in the face with a closed fist.

    Roughly one month later, on Jan. 6, 2025, Bazrouk assaulted a third Jewish victim — Victim-3 — at a protest concerning the Israel/Gaza war near 1st Avenue and East 18th Street in Manhattan. At this protest, Victim-3 was wearing an Israeli flag around his shoulders, a hat with an Israeli flag, and a chain with a Jewish star. During the protest, Bazrouk, who was wearing a keffiyeh on his face, made contact with Victim-3’s shoulder and wrapped his foot around Victim-3’s ankle.  Victim-3 attempted to push BAZROUK away and cursed at him. Bazrouk then punched Victim-3 in the nose with a closed fist.

    “Over the course of nine months, Tarek Bazrouk allegedly targeted and violently attacked multiple Jewish victims in a series of physical assaults, while demonstrating a pattern of supporting anti-Semitic terrorist organizations,” said Assistant Director in Charge Christopher G. Raia of the FBI New York Field Office. “These alleged hate crimes not only violated the victims’ ability to exercise their first amendment rights, but also intimidated and sparked fear among a broader population. The FBI won’t tolerate this behavior and will apprehend any individual who commits a federal crime seeking to harm others for their religious beliefs.”

    “As alleged, Tarek Bazrouk deliberately set out to harm Jewish New Yorkers — targeting them at protests, singling them out, and assaulting them for nothing more than their identity,” said NYPD Commissioner Jessica S. Tisch. “The NYPD worked closely with the FBI and the U.S. Attorney’s Office to track him down and ensure he faces real consequences. Antisemitism and all forms of bigotry have no home here in New York — period. New Yorkers of all faiths are welcome to live and worship in our city freely, and we will never stop fighting to protect that right.”

    According to court documents, pursuant to judicially authorized warrants, law enforcement subsequently searched a cellphone used by Bazrouk. Evidence from that device revealed Bazrouk’s anti-Semitic bias and his support for anti-Jewish terrorist groups including Hamas, demonstrating his motivation for repeatedly assaulting Jewish victims. In text messages, for example, Bazrouk identified himself as a “Jew hater,” labeled Jews as “worthless,” extorted “Allah” to “get us rid of [Jews],” called an acquittance a “Fucking Jew,” and told a friend to “slap that bitch” in reference to a woman with an Israeli sticker on her laptop. Bazrouk also told a friend that he was “mad happy” to have learned that certain of his family members overseas are part of Hamas. Bazrouk’s phone was also littered with pro-Hamas and pro-Hizballah propaganda, showing his support for organizations that have murdered thousands of Jews and Israelis.

    Bazrouk is charged with three counts of committing hate crimes, each of which carries a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison.

    The maximum potential penalties in this case are prescribed by Congress and are provided here for informational purposes only, as any sentencing of the defendant will be determined by the judge.

    U.S. Attorney Jay Clayton for the Southern District of New York praised the outstanding investigative work of the FBI and thanked the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office and the NYPD for their assistance.

    The prosecution of this case is being handled by the Office’s Civil Rights Unit in the Criminal Division. Assistant U.S. Attorneys Sam Adelsberg and Jim Ligtenberg for the Southern District of New York are in charge of the prosecution.

    An indictment is merely an allegation. All defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.   

    MIL Security OSI –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Tech companies urged to join drive to cut crime

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Press release

    Tech companies urged to join drive to cut crime

    Top tech experts are meeting the Justice Secretary as part of a Government drive to use AI and technology to transform the justice system and cut crime.

    • New study shows tags monitoring curfews cut reoffending by 20%
    • Top tech experts assemble to address criminal justice challenges
    • Ambition to use technology to deliver safer streets as part of Plan for Change

    Today around 30 companies including Microsoft, Amazon Web Services and Google will explore how revolutionary tech could be used to tackle violence in prison, better monitor offenders in the community and improve risk assessments of offenders.  

    The meeting comes as new research shows curfew tags, which keep offenders at home and off the streets during certain times, can reduce reoffending by 20 per cent. This demonstrates how even older technology is supporting punishment in the community and cutting crime. 

    The challenge now is to see how newer technology can contribute to help deliver the Government’s Plan for Change to make streets safer. 

    Today’s gathering will be chaired by James Timpson, the prison and probation minister, and opened by Lord Chancellor, Shabana Mahmood.  

    Lord Chancellor, Shabana Mahmood, said:  

    We inherited a justice system in crisis, with prisons close to collapse and staff overburdened and under pressure. 

    We need bold ideas to address the challenges that we face – supporting our staff, delivering swifter justice for victims, and cutting crime. 

    Today, we have an analogue justice system in a digital age.  

    The UK has a world-leading and growing tech sector, and I know our tech firms have a huge role to play in delivering our Plan for Change to make streets safer.

    The roundtable marks the first time key players in the UK’s tech ecosystem will meet with justice ministers to discuss some of the toughest challenges our courts, prisons and probation system face.  

    Discussion will focus on the potential for even more effective tracking of offender movement, using data to aid probation officers to perform better risk assessments and whether digital platforms can help offenders rehabilitate and integrate back into society, cutting reoffending.  

    It has been organised in partnership with techUK which is the trade association that brings together companies and organisations to promote digital technology. 

    techUK CEO, Julian David OBE said:  

    We’re honoured to be hosting this roundtable discussion with the Ministry of Justice – It presents an excellent opportunity for the tech sector to highlight the transformative role that technology is playing in modernising our criminal justice system.

    techUK and our members believe that collaboration and open dialogue are essential to fostering innovation and driving meaningful reform – particularly in how offenders are rehabilitated – and that digital tools can be a powerful force in sustaining this positive impact across society.

     Other companies attending include:  

    • Allied Universal: an industry leader technology and service company for three decades 

    • Cognizant Worldwide Limited: focuses on modernising technology, reimagining processes and transforming experiences 

    • TPXimpact​: a UK-based company focusing on digital transformation and creating positive change for people, places, and the planet 

    Microsoft Ltd. UK Public Sector General Manager, Amanda Sleight said:  

    We’re thrilled to be part of this groundbreaking initiative with the Ministry of Justice.

    Microsoft is committed to advancing the ethical use of AI technology to reduce the administrative burden on prison and probation staff, allowing them more time to focus on delivering high-quality frontline services, reducing recidivism and helping integrate offenders back into society.

    The aim is for a follow up to this meeting with an event open to the whole of industry to apply to come back and present their groundbreaking ideas and solutions in the coming months.

    Earlier this year, the Lord Chancellor set out her vision for the Probation Service, which included a bold new £8 million pledge to introduce new technology to help risk assess offenders and cut back on admin, increasing focus on those offenders who pose the greatest risk to the public.

    Share this page

    The following links open in a new tab

    • Share on Facebook (opens in new tab)
    • Share on Twitter (opens in new tab)

    Updates to this page

    Published 8 May 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Pressley, Markey, McGovern Applaud Court Decision Ordering Rümeysa Öztürk’s Transfer to Vermont

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congresswoman Ayanna Pressley (MA-07)

    LawmakersMet with Öztürk at Louisiana ICE Facility Where She Has Been illegally Detained Since March

    WASHINGTON – Today, Congresswoman Ayanna Pressley (MA-07), Senator Edward J. Markey (D-MA), and Congressman James P. McGovern (MA-02) released the following statement after the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit directed the Trump administration to comply with a lower court order to transfer Rümeysa Öztürk from ICE custody in Louisiana to Vermont. The court ordered the government to move Ms. Öztürk within one week. On March 25, 2025, Ms. Öztürk, a PhD student at Tufts University, was abducted by six plainclothes ICE agents off the streets of Somerville, Massachusetts. She was quickly moved across state lines and shipped more than 1,500 miles away from her community to a detention facility in Louisiana. 

    “We applaud the Second Circuit for rejecting the Trump administration’s attempt to delay complying with the district court’s order to transfer Rümeysa Öztürk from Louisiana to Vermont, where she will be closer to her community and to her legal counsel,” said Pressley, Markey, and McGovern. “Rümeysa should never have been abducted and transferred thousands of miles away to begin with. She is being unlawfully detained for writing an op-ed in her school newspaper and has not been charged with a single crime. Last month, we visited Rümeysa in detention in Louisiana, where she faces intolerable conditions and has suffered multiple asthma attacks. Rümeysa’s case is part of an alarming trend by the Trump administration to trample individuals’ constitutional rights to due process and free speech. Rümeysa must be released and have her visa restored immediately, and we will continue to ring the alarm loudly until that is the case.”

    On April 22, 2025, Pressley, Markey and McGovern, along with Representative Bennie Thompson (MS-02), Ranking Member of House Committee on Homeland Security, and Representative Troy Carter (LA-02), visited the Louisiana ICE facility where Rümeysa Öztürk was being held. Also on April 22, Senator Markey, Representative Pressley, and Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) sent a letter to Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Acting Director Todd Lyons to demand answers about the Trump administration’s concerning practice of detaining individuals, such as Öztürk, far from their attorneys and communities and in legal environments where their rights are more difficult to defend. The Trump administration is forum shopping to obtain a legal outcome favorable to its deportation agenda.

    ###

    MIL OSI USA News –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Wellington Police seize property for non-payment of fines in manner contrary to law

    Source: Independent Police Conduct Authority

    8 May 2025

    The Independent Police Conduct Authority received four complaints concerning Wellington Police officers obtaining a warrant and seizing vehicles for unpaid fines in 2022 and 2023. Upon review, the Authority found common themes arose which continue to be relevant to current Police practice.

    The complaints arose following the commencement of ‘Operation Cobalt’. As part of this operation, Police used their legal power to apply for warrants to seize property for unpaid fines, specifically for the purpose of disrupting gang activity. The practice then transitioned into general policing, where the seizures did not always relate to gang activity. However, outside of Operation Cobalt, Police had no policy or instructions regarding the execution of the warrants for unpaid fines.

    In three of the four cases we reviewed, officers lacked understanding of what is required when executing the warrants and they neglected to demand payment prior to seizing the vehicle. In doing so, they failed to comply with the requirements stipulated in the Summary Proceedings Act 1957, thereby making the vehicle seizures unlawful.

    In early 2024, after our investigation commenced, Police updated policy to include the necessary guidance. Officers are now required to have bailiffs present unless there is urgency and/or good reason for Police to execute the warrant as part of a major event operation or criminal investigation.

    The Authority recommends that, if Police wish to execute warrants to seize property for unpaid fines without the presence of bailiffs as part of major event operations or criminal investigations, Police should provide officers with specific training in the legal requirements for executing warrants and ensure that these are adhered to.

    The Authority also found that it was unnecessary and unreasonable for an officer to execute one of the warrants for unpaid fines during the early hours of the morning.

    Public Report

    MIL OSI New Zealand News –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Texas Man Convicted of Making Threats to Kill Nashville District Attorney Glenn Funk

    Source: US State of North Dakota

    David Aaron Bloyed, 60, of Frost, Texas, was found guilty today by a federal jury of one count of communicating a threat in interstate commerce to lynch and kill Glenn Funk, the elected District Attorney General (DA) for Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee.

    “The defendant’s heinous threats strike at the heart of our justice system and the safety of those who have chosen to serve. As today’s verdict demonstrates, violent threats and intimidation against government officials and law enforcement will not be tolerated,” said Sue J. Bai, Head of the Justice Department’s National Security Division. “I am grateful to our law enforcement partners and prosecution team for their swift and determined work to bring justice in this case.”

    “Antisemitic hate has no place in Nashville or anywhere, and this verdict shows these hateful threats for what they are: a crime,” said Acting U.S. Attorney Robert E. McGuire for the Middle District of Tennessee. “Our office will do whatever it takes to defend our community, and the prosecutors who serve it, from being threatened by these hatemongers.”

    “The conviction of David Bloyed is yet another example of the FBI’s commitment to holding those accountable who threaten public officials and the Jewish community,” said Assistant Director in Charge David J. Scott of the FBI’s Counterterrorism Division. “This criminal behavior and these disgusting threats will not be tolerated. The FBI will continue to work with our partners across the nation to investigate, identify, and hold those accountable who threaten violence and harm to specific communities and people.”

    According to court documents, on July 14, 2024, members of the Goyim Defense League (GDL) – a national and international network of antisemitic provocateurs who espouse vitriolic antisemitism via the internet, through propaganda distributions and in street actions – were protesting in downtown Nashville on their “Name the Nose Tour” where its members travel to cities across the country to protest in the vicinity of synagogues and walk through the downtown hubs of cities with Nazi flags and yell antisemitic slurs at any individuals they encounter. GDL members encountered an employee of a local bar and a fight broke out. A GDL member was arrested and charged with aggravated assault for hitting the bar employee repeatedly using a metal flagpole with a swastika affixed to the top.

    While in Nashville, GDL members routinely posted about their activities on various social media platforms, including Telegram. Following the arrest of the GDL member, a Telegram user associated with GDL posted threats against DA Funk that included a photograph of DA Funk with the caption, “Getting the rope,” and an emoji finger pointed towards Funk’s image. 

    The posts also included a photograph of a person hanging by the neck from a gallows, with the phrases, “The ‘Rope List’ grew by a few more Nashville jews today,” and “Will you survive the day of the rope?” 

    Law enforcement subsequently identified another social media account with an almost identical username, belonging to Bloyed and containing threats nearly identical to those posted on the Telegram account.

    At sentencing, Bloyed faces up to five years in federal prison.

    The FBI Nashville Field Office and the Metropolitan Nashville Police Department are investigating the case.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Security: Secretary Noem Puts Sanctuary City Leaders on Notice: Time to Put Americans First

    Source: US Department of Homeland Security

     The Secretary blasted sanctuary jurisdictions for failing to uphold federal law and called on leaders to stand up for Americans who have been victimized by reckless sanctuary policies

    SPRINGFIELD, IL – Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem today held a press conference highlighting the devastation sanctuary policies have caused in Illinois and across America with Angel families who shared their tragic stories of their loved ones lost because of illegal alien crime. The Secretary also called out Illinois Governor Pritzker for shielding law breakers.

    “As Secretary of Homeland Security, I’m going to uphold our federal immigration laws,” said Secretary Kristi Noem. “I’m going to draw attention to people who are breaking the law and violating our Constitution. I’m going to fight for the victims every single day and draw attention to them as long as we can. And President Trump will continue to do that as well. We should be united as a country around bringing violent criminals to justice and getting them out of the United States of America.”

    To watch the full press conference, click here.

    Some of the Angel Families who attended the press conference include: 

    • Jim Walden, Angel Father of Lance Corporal James Ray “Jimmy” Walden III. Jimmy was killed by a twice-deported illegal alien who crashed into Jimmy’s motorcycle. He was killed in Maryland, but his father lives in Illinois.
    • Kathy Zander, Angel Mother of John Zander. Four days before his 23rd birthday, John was convinced by his best friend to snort cocaine, not knowing that his friend had spiked it with fentanyl. John died from fentanyl poisoning.
    • Brian McCann, Angel Brother of Dennis “Denny” McCann. Denny was crossing the street when he was hit by a car in Chicago’s Logan Square neighborhood and dragged to his death by an illegal alien. The driver was charged in the fatal crash, but after being released on bond, he disappeared.   
    • Nancy Platania Angel Mother of Nick Platania who tragically lost his life to a fentanyl overdose. Nick worked to get others clean from drugs and started his own business before his life was tragically taken by deadly drugs funneled into American communities. 

    There are more than 200 sanctuary jurisdictions across the nation. The following headlines are only a handful of examples of sanctuary leaders refusing to work with federal law enforcement to protect Americans. 

    New York Governor Kathy Hochul:

    Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers:

    Nashville Mayor Freddie O’Connell:

    Portland Police Chief Bob Day:

    Los Angeles Police Chief Jim McDonnell:

    Boston Police Department Commissioner Michael Cox:

    On April 28, 2025, President Donald Trump signed the Protecting American Communities from Criminal Aliens Executive Order. Under the President’s order, the Secretary of Homeland Security and the Attorney General are directed to publish a list of states and local jurisdictions that obstruct the enforcement of federal immigration laws.

    Under President Trump’s leadership, DHS will work with DOJ to end violations of federal immigration law and bring jurisdictions into compliance with the laws of the United States.

    ###

    MIL Security OSI –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Police acknowledge IPCA findings on vehicle seizures

    Source: New Zealand Police

    Please attribute to Relieving Wellington District Commander Inspector Lincoln Sycamore:

    Police acknowledge the findings by the Independent Police Conduct Authority (IPCA) regarding four complaints against Wellington Police officers obtaining a warrant and seizing vehicles for unpaid fines in 2022 and 2023.

    The incidents occurred following the start of ‘Operation Cobalt’, a nationwide effort by Police to target and disrupt illegal gang activity. As part of this operation, Police staff would apply for warrants to seize property belonging to gang members with unpaid fines.

    Police have reviewed the policy and practice regarding obtaining a warrant to seize property for unpaid fines and have addressed the recommendation made by the IPCA.

    In March 2024, we updated our search instructions for officers to ensure they are aware of and understand their obligations. Officers are required to have Ministry of Justice bailiffs present at the search location, unless there is urgency and or good reason for Police to execute the warrant as part of a major event operation or criminal investigation.

    We also agree with the second recommendation made by the IPCA and have already begun the process to engage with Ministry of Justice to update an internal form used by officers. This will ensure the form accurately reflects the scope of the search and seizure power under section 99 of the Summary Proceedings Act 1957.

    ENDS

    Issued by Police Media Centre

    MIL OSI New Zealand News –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: AG Brown co-leads states suing to stop illegal termination of federal electric vehicle infrastructure funding

    Source: Washington State News

    SEATTLE — Washington is co-leading a lawsuit to stop the Trump administration from illegally terminating billions in congressionally approved funding for electric vehicle infrastructure – including a combined $1 billion in the plaintiff states, Attorney General Nick Brown announced today. Unless the courts check the president’s overreach, Washington stands to lose over $71 million in electric vehicle infrastructure funding.

    “The president’s illegal claw-backs aren’t spending reductions – they’re cash grabs that rob taxpayers, steamroll Congress, and stifle critical economic development,” Brown said. “Washingtonians are switching to electric vehicles at one of the highest rates in the nation. They deserve safe, reliable infrastructure to get their families from Point A to B.”

    The 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, also known as the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, passed by Congress appropriated $5 billion for the National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Formula Program, or the NEVI program, to fund states’ nationwide deployment of electric vehicle charging infrastructure to improve reliability and accessibility for the public.

    On Jan. 20, President Trump mandated federal agencies pause disbursement of all funds appropriated under the IIJA and the Inflation Reduction Act, including NEVI program funding. Despite being mandated by Congress to fund the NEVI program, the Federal Highway Administration notified states in February the agency was unlawfully revoking previous state plan approvals and withholding or withdrawing NEVI program funds from the states.

    Washington is a national leader in electric vehicle use, remaining in the top five states for electric vehicle adoption for more than a decade. The electric vehicle transition is critical to the success of Washington’s plans to cut transportation-related pollution.

    Transportation is the largest source of carbon pollution in Washington. Vehicle pollution causes health problems, such as cancer and asthma, and contributes to climate change. To combat climate change and protect the health of its residents, Washington has adopted zero-emission vehicle standards that require a percentage of the vehicles sold in Washington to be zero emission, starting with the 2025 model year.

    The state also has vehicle emissions standards that require all new passenger cars, light-duty trucks, and medium-duty vehicles sold in Washington be zero emission by 2035. The state has proactively invested in EV charging infrastructure for many years, but Washington’s ability to make this transition and meet its own statutory requirements is significantly hampered by the FHWA’s indefinite withholding of the NEVI program funds Congress directed to the state.

    The lawsuit filed today by Brown and 16 other attorneys general seeks a court order against FHWA’s unlawful actions, and a restoration of the electric vehicle infrastructure funding for the states.

    Brown is co-leading this lawsuit with California and Colorado. They are joined by the attorneys general of Arizona, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Wisconsin.

    A copy of the complaint is available here and a copy of the motion for a preliminary injunction is here.

    -30-

    Washington’s Attorney General serves the people and the state of Washington. As the state’s largest law firm, the Attorney General’s Office provides legal representation to every state agency, board, and commission in Washington. Additionally, the Office serves the people directly by enforcing consumer protection, civil rights, and environmental protection laws. The Office also prosecutes elder abuse, Medicaid fraud, and handles sexually violent predator cases in 38 of Washington’s 39 counties.

    Visit www.atg.wa.gov to learn more.

    Media Contact:

    Email: press@atg.wa.gov

    Phone: (360) 753-2727

    General contacts: Click here

    Media Resource Guide & Attorney General’s Office FAQ

    MIL OSI USA News –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Security: Texas Man Convicted of Making Threats to Kill Nashville District Attorney Glenn Funk

    Source: United States Attorneys General 13

    David Aaron Bloyed, 60, of Frost, Texas, was found guilty today by a federal jury of one count of communicating a threat in interstate commerce to lynch and kill Glenn Funk, the elected District Attorney General (DA) for Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee.

    “The defendant’s heinous threats strike at the heart of our justice system and the safety of those who have chosen to serve. As today’s verdict demonstrates, violent threats and intimidation against government officials and law enforcement will not be tolerated,” said Sue J. Bai, Head of the Justice Department’s National Security Division. “I am grateful to our law enforcement partners and prosecution team for their swift and determined work to bring justice in this case.”

    “Antisemitic hate has no place in Nashville or anywhere, and this verdict shows these hateful threats for what they are: a crime,” said Acting U.S. Attorney Robert E. McGuire for the Middle District of Tennessee. “Our office will do whatever it takes to defend our community, and the prosecutors who serve it, from being threatened by these hatemongers.”

    “The conviction of David Bloyed is yet another example of the FBI’s commitment to holding those accountable who threaten public officials and the Jewish community,” said Assistant Director in Charge David J. Scott of the FBI’s Counterterrorism Division. “This criminal behavior and these disgusting threats will not be tolerated. The FBI will continue to work with our partners across the nation to investigate, identify, and hold those accountable who threaten violence and harm to specific communities and people.”

    According to court documents, on July 14, 2024, members of the Goyim Defense League (GDL) – a national and international network of antisemitic provocateurs who espouse vitriolic antisemitism via the internet, through propaganda distributions and in street actions – were protesting in downtown Nashville on their “Name the Nose Tour” where its members travel to cities across the country to protest in the vicinity of synagogues and walk through the downtown hubs of cities with Nazi flags and yell antisemitic slurs at any individuals they encounter. GDL members encountered an employee of a local bar and a fight broke out. A GDL member was arrested and charged with aggravated assault for hitting the bar employee repeatedly using a metal flagpole with a swastika affixed to the top.

    While in Nashville, GDL members routinely posted about their activities on various social media platforms, including Telegram. Following the arrest of the GDL member, a Telegram user associated with GDL posted threats against DA Funk that included a photograph of DA Funk with the caption, “Getting the rope,” and an emoji finger pointed towards Funk’s image. 

    The posts also included a photograph of a person hanging by the neck from a gallows, with the phrases, “The ‘Rope List’ grew by a few more Nashville jews today,” and “Will you survive the day of the rope?” 

    Law enforcement subsequently identified another social media account with an almost identical username, belonging to Bloyed and containing threats nearly identical to those posted on the Telegram account.

    At sentencing, Bloyed faces up to five years in federal prison.

    The FBI Nashville Field Office and the Metropolitan Nashville Police Department are investigating the case.

    MIL Security OSI –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Security: Security News: Texas Man Convicted of Making Threats to Kill Nashville District Attorney Glenn Funk

    Source: United States Department of Justice 2

    David Aaron Bloyed, 60, of Frost, Texas, was found guilty today by a federal jury of one count of communicating a threat in interstate commerce to lynch and kill Glenn Funk, the elected District Attorney General (DA) for Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee.

    “The defendant’s heinous threats strike at the heart of our justice system and the safety of those who have chosen to serve. As today’s verdict demonstrates, violent threats and intimidation against government officials and law enforcement will not be tolerated,” said Sue J. Bai, Head of the Justice Department’s National Security Division. “I am grateful to our law enforcement partners and prosecution team for their swift and determined work to bring justice in this case.”

    “Antisemitic hate has no place in Nashville or anywhere, and this verdict shows these hateful threats for what they are: a crime,” said Acting U.S. Attorney Robert E. McGuire for the Middle District of Tennessee. “Our office will do whatever it takes to defend our community, and the prosecutors who serve it, from being threatened by these hatemongers.”

    “The conviction of David Bloyed is yet another example of the FBI’s commitment to holding those accountable who threaten public officials and the Jewish community,” said Assistant Director in Charge David J. Scott of the FBI’s Counterterrorism Division. “This criminal behavior and these disgusting threats will not be tolerated. The FBI will continue to work with our partners across the nation to investigate, identify, and hold those accountable who threaten violence and harm to specific communities and people.”

    According to court documents, on July 14, 2024, members of the Goyim Defense League (GDL) – a national and international network of antisemitic provocateurs who espouse vitriolic antisemitism via the internet, through propaganda distributions and in street actions – were protesting in downtown Nashville on their “Name the Nose Tour” where its members travel to cities across the country to protest in the vicinity of synagogues and walk through the downtown hubs of cities with Nazi flags and yell antisemitic slurs at any individuals they encounter. GDL members encountered an employee of a local bar and a fight broke out. A GDL member was arrested and charged with aggravated assault for hitting the bar employee repeatedly using a metal flagpole with a swastika affixed to the top.

    While in Nashville, GDL members routinely posted about their activities on various social media platforms, including Telegram. Following the arrest of the GDL member, a Telegram user associated with GDL posted threats against DA Funk that included a photograph of DA Funk with the caption, “Getting the rope,” and an emoji finger pointed towards Funk’s image. 

    The posts also included a photograph of a person hanging by the neck from a gallows, with the phrases, “The ‘Rope List’ grew by a few more Nashville jews today,” and “Will you survive the day of the rope?” 

    Law enforcement subsequently identified another social media account with an almost identical username, belonging to Bloyed and containing threats nearly identical to those posted on the Telegram account.

    At sentencing, Bloyed faces up to five years in federal prison.

    The FBI Nashville Field Office and the Metropolitan Nashville Police Department are investigating the case.

    MIL Security OSI –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Arrest made, further information sought in relation to serious incidents, Invercargill

    Source: New Zealand Police

    A young has been arrested as Police progress an investigation into several serious incidents in Invercargill.

    It follows two aggravated robberies, two burglaries and an attempted burglary, all between 1.50am and 4.30am on Monday morning.

    Thankfully, no serious injuries were reported, but the victims were understandably upset and shaken by what occurred, Detective Inspector Stu Harvey said.

    Police have arrested and charged a young person in relation to the incidents. He is facing a number of charges and has been remanded in custody to appear in the Invercargill Youth Court today.

    “The investigation into this offending is still very much active. We understand these events are unnerving for our community, and we are working hard to locate those we believe to be involved,” Detective Inspector Harvey says.

    “We still need the public’s help and want to hear from anyone who might be able to assist.

    “In particular, Police are seeking information about two vehicles that were seen in the area of some of the incidents. One of them, a stolen red Toyota Vitz, was involved in the offending and has been recovered while the other vehicle is described only as a car.

    “Police would like to speak to anyone who saw vehicles fitting these descriptions between 1am and 5am on Monday.”

    Anyone with information about these vehicles or those involved is asked to call Police on 105.  You can also share information anonymously through Crime Stoppers on 0800 555 111.

    ENDS

    MIL OSI New Zealand News –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Durbin Requests Probe Into Justice Department Use Of Aircraft For Personal Or Political Purposes

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Illinois Dick Durbin
    May 07, 2025
    Request for a GAO review comes amid public reporting of Kash Patel’s repeated travel on government aircraft that raises questions about proper reimbursement and oversight compliance
    WASHINGTON – U.S. Senate Democratic Whip Dick Durbin (D-IL), Ranking Member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, today requested a review of the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) use of government-owned aircraft by senior executives, in light of concerns about compliance with federal regulations that restrict nonmission-related travel and require reimbursement for personal or political use.
    In a letter to the Government Accountability Office (GAO), Durbin began by asserting his request, writing: “I write to request that the Government Accountability Office (GAO) conduct a comprehensive review of the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) use of government-owned aircraft by senior executives.”
    Durbin continued by outlining policies and procedures for executive air travel, writing: “Multiple components within DOJ—including the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), and United States Marshals Service (USMS)—own, lease, and operate a fleet of aircraft primarily to support mission-critical DOJ operations such as counterterrorism, criminal surveillance, and interdiction of illicit drug trafficking. While use of government aircraft for nonmission-related needs is generally prohibited by federal regulations, such aircraft can be made available regardless of the trip’s purpose for ‘required use travel,’ which is travel that ‘requires use of a [g]overnment aircraft to meet bona fide communications needs (e.g., 24-hour secure communications), security requirements (e.g., highly unusual circumstances that present a clear and present danger), or exceptional scheduling requirements… of an executive agency.’ The President has typically designated two executives within DOJ as ‘required use’ travelers—the Attorney General and the FBI Director—due to their need for special protective security measures and secure communications while in flight. However, federal guidance requires that such travelers reimburse the government for any travel that is for political or personal reasons.”
    Durbin then cited recent reporting that FBI Director Kash Patel’s recent travel raises compliance questions, writing: “Some of these flights appear to coincide with official business,  but it is not clear whether all travel was mission-related or personal in nature. Nonetheless, this reporting underscores the need for clarity on whether DOJ executives—including the FBI Director—are complying with applicable regulations and reimbursement requirements for nonmission-related travel and whether DOJ has sufficient internal controls to track and enforce those obligations.”
    Durbin concluded with a request to update its 2013 report into the matter, writing: “Given these developments, I request that GAO review the circumstances in which DOJ aircraft are being used to transport executives for nonmission purposes, including the costs of these flights… This review is critical to ensuring the appropriate use of taxpayer resources and maintaining public trust in DOJ’s operations and use of taxpayer dollars.”
    For a PDF of the letter to GAO, click here.
    -30-

    MIL OSI USA News –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: 5 big wins from DOC’s National Predator Control Programme |

    Source: Police investigating after shots fired at Hastings house

    Learn how bats, Fiordland tokoeka kiwi, and kākā are all benefiting from our landscape-scale predator control programme using 1080 to protect public conservation land.

    Fiordland tokoeka kiwi chick. Image: Belle Gwilliam

    Our National Predator Control Programme

    DOC’s National Predator Control Programme protects native wildlife and forests at important conservation sites across New Zealand.

    Currently, we control predators on a sustained, rotational basis over about 1.8 million hectares, which is nearly 20% of public conservation land.

    It’s critical that rats, stoats, and possums are regularly controlled so that populations of threatened native species can survive and grow.

    We use the most effective tools available, such as 1080 toxin and large-scale trapping, to protect vulnerable native species and forests. 

    While the tools and strategies are being developed to achieve Predator Free 2050, our National Predator Control Programme is holding the line for threatened native species by regularly controlling introduced predators across large forest areas. 

    We recently published our 2024 National Predator Control Programme report which shows we had some big wins for our native species last year.

    You can read the full report here: National Predator Control Programme Annual Report 2024

    Here’s our top five highlights of 2024 – from bustling bat roosts to turning the tide for one of our rarest kiwi species:

    1️⃣ We’ve turned the tide for Fiordland tokoeka kiwi

    Before predator control, every single kiwi chick we monitored in Shy Lake died, meaning the species was facing extinction. 

    After predator control and eight years of research, last year’s kiwi chick survival rate climbed to 60%. 

    Ranger Chris Dodd with ‘Spanners’, one of the first monitored tokoeka chicks to survive during the programme, now fully grown. Image: Monty Williams.

    2️⃣ Thanks to our science advice, we’ve improved timing for operations and achieved our best results yet

    Our scientists carefully reviewed the results of how we time our operations around beech masts. With their advice, we changed tactics and targeted rats either before beech seed was produced or after it had germinated. 

    It paid off big time – all our operations suppressed rats effectively, in most cases down to undetectable levels. 

    Predator plague cycle. Image: DOC

    3️⃣ Pīwauwau rock wren thriving with predator control

    There are an average of twice as many rock wrens at predator control sites compared to sites with no control.

    Every year our team surveys alpine rock wren populations. Research across our 25 sites shows that aerial operations help rock wren populations recover and grow. 

    Tuke/pīwauwau/rock wren calling in the alpine tops of Fiordland. Photo: Sabine Bernert ©

    4️⃣ We found a record-breaking pekapeka bat roost while monitoring the results of predator control

    We discovered 275 bats in one tree roost in Whirinaki Te Pua-a-Tāne Conservation park where we undertake regular predator control operations. That’s a lot of bats! 

    Pekapeka/short-tailed bat. Image: Maddy Brennan

    5️⃣ Thanks to predator control, kākā in Waipapa have the most balanced sex ratio ever recorded

    Female kākā are more vulnerable to predation, especially when they’re confined to nest cavities during breeding season. Studying the ratio of kākā males to females can help us understand the health of a population and its predation pressures. 

    This year, kākā monitoring in Pureora Forest (an ongoing predator control site) revealed a 1:1 sex ratio – the most balanced we’ve ever recorded.  

    Kākā eating rātā flower. Photo: Sarah Stirrup

    ” data-medium-file=”https://i0.wp.com/blog.doc.govt.nz/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/kaka.png?fit=300%2C191&ssl=1″ data-large-file=”https://i0.wp.com/blog.doc.govt.nz/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/kaka.png?fit=580%2C368&ssl=1″ src=”https://i0.wp.com/blog.doc.govt.nz/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/kaka.png?resize=580%2C368&ssl=1″ alt=”” class=”wp-image-56358″ srcset=”https://i0.wp.com/blog.doc.govt.nz/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/kaka.png?w=800&ssl=1 800w, https://i0.wp.com/blog.doc.govt.nz/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/kaka.png?resize=300%2C191&ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/blog.doc.govt.nz/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/kaka.png?resize=768%2C488&ssl=1 768w” sizes=”auto, (max-width: 580px) 100vw, 580px”/>

    Kākā eating some delcious rātā flower. Image: Sarah Stirrup

    Learn more about DOC’s National Predator Control Programme and read the full report here: National Predator Control Programme

    Share this:

    MIL OSI New Zealand News –

    May 8, 2025
←Previous Page
1 … 380 381 382 383 384 … 1,005
Next Page→
NewzIntel.com

NewzIntel.com

MIL Open Source Intelligence

  • Blog
  • About
  • FAQs
  • Authors
  • Events
  • Shop
  • Patterns
  • Themes

Twenty Twenty-Five

Designed with WordPress