Source: United Nations – Geneva
The Committee against Torture today concluded its consideration of the fourth periodic report of Kuwait, with Committee Experts commending the State on positive measures introduced to combat torture, while raising questions on the independence of the judiciary and the application of the death penalty.
Peter Vedel Kessing, Committee Expert and Rapporteur, commended Kuwait for all the positive measures taken, including new laws and regulations to prevent torture.
Abdul Razzaq Rawan, Committee Expert and Rapporteur for Kuwait, asked if the State party could inform the Committee of any legislative amendments or developments aimed at establishing the judiciary as an authority that was independent of the executive authority, and granting it the full authority to manage the affairs of judges and supervise the preparation of relevant regulations? What measures had been taken to implement the constitutional principle guaranteeing the independence of the judiciary and to implement the requirements of article 163?
Mr. Vedel Kessing said the number of death sentences and executions carried out had reportedly increased, particularly since 2022. How many persons had been sentenced to death over the last five years and how many of those persons had been executed? Was it correct that a person could be sentenced to death for crimes not involving intentional killing, for example drug-related crimes? Allegedly, the abolition of the death penalty would be incompatible with Islamic Sharia, which was the main source of all Kuwaiti domestic legislation, including criminal law. Would this also apply to a moratorium for the execution of death sentences?
The delegation said judges needed to be fully competent and qualified in the field of law or Sharia and did not have the right to exercise political activities. Judges could not be removed from their posts unless disciplinary measures were issued against them. If judges were related to the accused by four degrees, they were required to recuse themselves from proceedings. The Ministry of Justice could not get involved in daily cases or the running of the judiciary. The judiciary was fully independent; there was no involvement from the executive or the parliament in the judiciary.
The delegation said the death penalty was one of last instance, the maximum penalty issued in the Criminal Code of Kuwait. It was only enacted for the most serious crimes and was not in contradiction with Islamic Sharia. At any stage of proceedings, the accused murderer could appeal, or ask for a lighter or reduced sentence, rather than the death penalty. From 2022 to 2024, there were 80 penalties reduced from the death penalty to a lighter sentence, with people even being released in some cases. In the case of a woman who was pregnant, the death penalty could not be carried out until the child was born. Minors could not be subjected to the death penalty.
Introducing the report, Naser Alhayen, Permanent Representative of Kuwait to the United Nations Office at Geneva and head of the delegation, said the accession of Kuwait to the Convention against Torture in 1996 was a pioneering step towards promoting rights and preserving freedoms. Since the submission of the fourth periodic report, Kuwait had taken steps to strengthen the legislative framework related to combatting torture. These efforts were represented in the issuance of decree-law no. 93 of 2024, which clearly stipulated the definition and prohibition of torture. The new law tightened the penalties imposed on perpetrators of torture crimes, and strictly criminalised any act of discrimination or ill treatment.
In closing remarks, Claude Heller, Committee Chairperson, thanked the delegation for the dialogue which had been very constructive. The Committee aimed to contribute to the improvement of human rights in all States.
Mr. Alhayen, in concluding remarks, thanked the Committee for the dialogue. Kuwait was fully committed to the implementation of all international standards and human rights and would continue the constructive dialogue with the Committee and the international community.
The delegation of Kuwait consisted of representatives from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs; the Ministry of Justice; the Ministry of Interior; the Ministry of Defense; the Ministry of Social Affairs; the Ministry of Information; the Ministry of Health; the Ministry of Education; the Central System for the Remedy of Situations of Illegal Residents; the Public Authority of Manpower; and the Permanent Mission of Kuwait to the United Nations Office at Geneva.
The Committee will issue concluding observations on the report of Kuwait at the end of its eighty-first session on 22 November. Those and other documents relating to the Committee’s work, including reports submitted by States parties, will be available on the session’s webpage. Summaries of the public meetings of the Committee can be found here, and webcasts of the public meetings can be found here.
The Committee will next meet in public on Thursday, 31 October at 3 p.m. to conclude its consideration of the third periodic report of Namibia (CAT/C/NAM/3).
Report
The Committee has before it the fourth periodic report of Kuwait (CAT/C/KWT/4).
Presentation of Report
NASER ALHAYEN, Permanent Representative of Kuwait to the United Nations Office at Geneva and head of the delegation, said the accession of Kuwait to the Convention against Torture in 1996 was a pioneering step towards promoting rights and preserving freedoms. Since the submission of the fourth periodic report, Kuwait had taken steps to strengthen the legislative framework related to combatting torture. These efforts were represented in the issuance of decree-law no. 93 of 2024, which clearly stipulated the definition and prohibition of torture. The new law tightened the penalties imposed on perpetrators of torture crimes, and strictly criminalised any act of discrimination or ill treatment. This decree was a milestone in the State’s efforts to strengthen the rule of law and protect human rights, and it imposed severe penalties of up to life imprisonment for certain crimes. A decree had also been adopted which redefined measures for receiving complaints relating to human rights.
Kuwaiti legislation included comprehensive protection for women and criminalisation of all forms of violence against them. The protection from domestic violence law no. 160 of 2020 was issued, which established shelters for victims of domestic violence, and the possibility of reporting violence. A child protection centre was also established. The Supreme Council for Family Affairs was working on establishing the third centre for protection from domestic violence and the rehabilitation of survivors. Law no. 21 of 2015 guaranteed the rights of the child, prohibiting children from deliberately being subjected to any physical or psychological abuse and punishing those who violated these provisions.
Specialised enforcement departments had been established to implement family court rulings and settle family disputes. Social security and insurance were provided to persons with disabilities. Monthly financial allocations were provided, in addition to a cash allowance for hiring a domestic worker or a driver to meet their daily needs. During the first half of 2024, the number of residents in social care homes reached 518 people, including 362 citizens and 165 non-citizens. These homes provided integrated rehabilitation and training programmes focused on reintegration.
The protection of the rights of contracted workers was a top priority for Kuwait, and this was highlighted in law no. 68 of 2015 on the protection of the rights of contracted workers. Since the adoption of the law, the situation of domestic workers had improved substantially, as strict laws had been imposed to prevent the exploitation of these workers and ensure them full legal protection. Inspection campaigns were conducted periodically on domestic labour recruitment offices and agencies to ensure that they applied the law; these campaigns issued fines in the event procedures were not followed.
Law no. 91 of 2013 aimed to criminalise all forms of human trafficking and provide legal protection for victims. The National Committee to Combat Trafficking in Persons was established, as well as a specialised prosecutor to investigate these cases. There had been a significant decrease in the number of trafficking crimes committed from 82 cases in 2020 to nine cases in 2023. A special system had been established for the early identification of victims by training workers at border crossings and hospitals to detect signs of exploitation. Victims were then transferred to care centres where they received medical, psychological and legal support.
Kuwait had adopted an approach that achieved more security for detainees by subjecting all prisons to the supervision of the judicial authority, represented by the Public Prosecution, which was an independent authority. The current system guaranteed every detainee the right to access a lawyer from the first moment of detention, and ensured that all detainees obtained their legal rights, and were granted an independent medical examination.
Mechanisms had been developed which allowed detainees or their families to submit confidential complaints for immediate investigation, with any official found to be involved in ill treatment held accountable. Advanced training programmes for police officers and prison staff had been developed in cooperation with the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, with a special focus on practical aspects related to dealing with detainees. Mr. Alhayen concluded by emphasising Kuwait’s full commitment to human rights and to cooperation with the international community.
Questions by Committee Experts
ABDUL RAZZAQ RAWAN, Committee Expert and Rapporteur for Kuwait, congratulated Kuwait for the desire expressed with regards to continued cooperation and dialogue with the Committee. The Committee congratulated Kuwait on announcing a number of important initiatives and legislation. The Committee also congratulated the State party on the fact that half the delegation were women, and that the delegation represented multiple sectors, reflecting the importance of the Convention.
The Committee congratulated Kuwait for the work of the National Standing Committee on follow-up and communications that prepared the report, while asking for further clarification around the work of this body. What was the number of organizations which attended consultations for preparing the report, and how did these consultations impact the report? Could the State party elaborate further on the place of the Convention within the national legal system, in particular article 70 of the Kuwaiti Constitution? What was the impact of this jurisprudence in the country? To what extent was there an application of the provisions of the Convention by law enforcement officers?
Decree-law no. 93 of 2024 amended some provisions of the Kuwaiti Penal Code, with a new article which stipulated that the punishment of a public official who caused physical or psychological harm to a person, or induced him to confess to committing a crime, would face imprisonment for a period not exceeding five years and a fine not exceeding 5,000 dinars. Penalties for torture should be proportionate to the acts committed and the damage resulting from them. Torture leading to death was a crime that should be treated as more severe than murder, and should have its own punishment to distinguish it from ordinary murder. Could the State party comment on this?
Could the State party also comment regarding article 37 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which allowed the use of “any means” during investigations to obtain evidence, provided that it was not contrary to public morals or infringed on the rights and freedoms of individuals? What procedural safeguards prevented coercion to remove confessions during interrogations and pretrial detention? What legal texts and legislative measures ensured the exclusion of torture from national legislation on amnesty and immunities? What was being done to fill this gap at the legislative level and in practice? The Convention obliged States parties to prevent and prohibit torture in all circumstances, including a state of emergency, war or any other exceptional circumstance. What were the State’s planned future actions to implement this commitment?
The Committee was satisfied with the provisions of paragraph 126 of the national report, in particular the requirements of articles 158 and 159 concerning the prohibition of coercion or inducement of the accused to make statements and the invalidity of a confession obtained under duress or torture. Could current examples be provided of judicial decisions invalidating confessions of accused persons as a result of torture?
The Committee had questions regarding the right of detainees to challenge the lawfulness or necessity of their detention. What actions had been taken to establish safeguards currently, or in the future, as well as the measures taken to enforce respect for them by law enforcement officials? What measures had been taken with regard to the control of records in all places of deprivation of liberty? Was there a centralised national information register that included all the data of the records in the detention centres in the country?
The Committee had expressed concern that judges were appointed by the Supreme Judiciary Council. There was also concern about the independence of foreign judges due to a lack of career security. Could the State party inform the Committee of any legislative amendments or developments aimed at establishing the judiciary as an authority that was independent of the executive authority, and granting it the full authority to manage the affairs of judges and supervise the preparation of relevant regulations? This included the conditions for managing the judiciary, appointing judges, tracking their careers, including their dismissal and promotion, and the conditions for appointing foreign judges to ensure their job security. What measures had been taken to implement the constitutional principle guaranteeing the independence of the judiciary and to implement the requirements of article 163?
The Committee had previously recommended that the State party adopt a legislative and institutional framework that incorporated international standards on asylum. Was this on the legislative agenda? While noting the decisions reported in the report whereby the daily fines imposed in many cases had been abolished, what measures had been taken to give effect to the Committee’s previous recommendation to amend the laws imposing such fines? What was the nature of cooperation with the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, and could any statistics be provided?
What measures were taken during the period under review to ensure that no person was returned to a country where they were in danger of being subjected to torture or ill treatment? Were those concerned with expulsion, return or extradition informed that they were entitled to seek asylum and appeal against deportation decisions? What legal and practical safeguards existed to ensure the right of persons for whom deportation orders had been issued, to have their cases reviewed by a competent judicial body? How many cases of return, extradition and expulsion had been carried out by the State party during the reporting period in exchange for diplomatic assurances?
Did Kuwaiti law and jurisprudence allow for universal jurisdiction, which was the following and prosecution of crimes of torture, so as to establish jurisdiction in all cases and to ensure that perpetrators did not go unpunished? If the State received a request for extradition from a State where Kuwait had no extradition agreement or treaty, what were the legislative and administrative measures needed to ensure that the Convention could be invoked as a legal basis for extradition? Had the State ever refused a request by another State for the extradition of an individual suspected of the crime of torture? Had it initiated any criminal proceedings against that individual as a result? If so, could information on the status and results of these proceedings be provided?
Could the delegation provide the Committee with information on any specialised programmes aimed at raising awareness of law enforcement officials, including security and prison personnel, and the measures adopted by the State party to prevent torture? Had any programmes been adopted and implemented to train police cadets and officers in non-coercive investigative techniques? Could information be provided on the assessment, review and updating of interrogation rules for persons who had been subjected to any form of arrest, detention or imprisonment? What did the State of Kuwait intend to do to fulfil the obligation of monitoring practices related to interrogation, methods of detention, and treatment of persons arrested?
The Committee would appreciate receiving information on the cases in which the legal provisions on the protection of witnesses and medical professionals documenting acts of torture and ill treatment had applied, in particular cases where these provisions had not been respected and action that had been taken against persons who had violated these legal requirements? Taking into account the legal amendments on torture, did Kuwait intend to accompany these amendments by allocating legal provisions related to the protection of victims, witnesses and medical experts in criminal law?
Article 14 of the Convention obligated States parties to provide a legislative framework for the right of victims to effective remedy and adequate compensation. What measures would be taken to give effect to this commitment through the adoption of legislation and institutional requirements? What measures of reparation and compensation, including court-ordered rehabilitation methods, had been made available to victims of torture and ill treatment or their families since the consideration of the previous periodic report? Were programmes being implemented to provide reparation to victims of torture and ill treatment, including health and psychological rehabilitation?
PETER VEDEL KESSING, Committee Expert and Rapporteur, asked what progress had been made to establish a fully independent National Human Rights Institution in line with the Paris Principles? Did the Government agree with reports that some law enforcement officers still engaged in abuse and ill treatment during arrest or interrogation? How many complaints of torture and ill treatment had been received over the last three years and what was the outcome of these complaints?
Were the three institutions which could investigate allegations of torture – the Office of the Public Prosecution, the General Directorate for Oversights and Inspection in the Ministry of Interior, and the National Bureau for Human Rights – completely independent from the Government as required under the Convention? Would the State party consider establishing a fully independent institution that could investigate violations of the Convention in an effective and impartial way? How many complaints had the Bureau received over alleged torture and ill treatment over the last three years? What was the outcome of these cases?
Overcrowding in prisons continued to be a significant problem, particularly in the central prison. The prison population was reported to be at an occupancy rate of 126 per cent in 2023. What efforts that had been taken to improve the living conditions in prisons? Was the Government considering additional efforts since the problem with overcrowding had not been solved? What progress had been made on the building of the new prison?
A law reportedly allowed the use of shackling of hands and feet for up to a month and the deprivation of certain types of food for a week as disciplinary punishment. How many detainees had been shackled over the last three years? What kind of offence warranted this punishment? How many detainees had been deprived of food over the last three years?
How could a prisoner make a complaint over ill treatment in the prison? How many complaints of ill treatment had been received over the last three years and what was the outcome of these cases? Was it correct that some officers only received a decrease in their salaries as a penalty for having subjected detainees to torture and other forms of ill treatment? How many visits had the International Committee of the Red Cross undertaken to places of detention from 2019 and onwards? How many announced and unannounced visits had the National Bureau for Human Rights carried out to places of detention over the last three years? How had Kuwait followed-up and implemented the recommendations from the independent institutions visiting places of detention in Kuwait?
The number of death sentences and executions carried out had reportedly increased, particularly since 2022. How many persons had been sentenced to death over the last five years and how many of those persons had been executed? Was it correct that a person could be sentenced to death for crimes not involving intentional killing, for example drug-related crimes? Allegedly, the abolition of the death penalty would be incompatible with Islamic Sharia, which was the main source of all Kuwaiti domestic legislation, including criminal law. Did this also apply to a moratorium for the execution of death sentences?
The delegation had provided important information on steps taken to improve the protection of foreign workers, including reviewing the laws, improving working conditions, and criminalising trafficking, which were positive steps. However, it was reported that there was a high death rate among migrant workers who carried out dangerous work, particularly in construction sites. How many migrant workers had died in Kuwait over the last three years? What measures were taken to protect migrant workers from ill treatment and exploitation? Why was a domestic worker not allowed to freely resign and change workplace? Why did they need the consent of or authorisation from the employer to change workplace?
The Committee appreciated the steps taken by Kuwait to counter domestic and sexual violence. Could marital rape be punished in Kuwait? Were there concrete court cases where martial rape had been punished as a criminal offence? What was the outcome of the court cases involving violence against women? In how many cases were the accused persons convicted for a crime and what were the sentences? Was the Government considering a ban on corporal punishment in all settings?
There had been reported concerns that Bidoon citizens were being denied access to education, health care and employment, and faced mass arrests, torture and abuse when trying to exercise their right to freedom of peaceful assembly. Did the Government accept the criticism and recommendations from the United Nations Human Rights Committee and from other sources, and was it willing to improve conditions for the Bidoons?
A Committee Expert said prolonged solitary confinement was proven to undermine the standards outlined in the Convention. Under what circumstances was incommunicado detention authorised? Would the State party consider abolishing incommunicado detention?
Responses by the Delegation
The delegation said the National Standing Committee on follow-up and communications was established in 2019. This Committee was delegated to respond to reports regarding the human rights situation in Kuwait and was assigned with preparing periodic reports presented to international bodies, and coordinating with non-governmental organizations working in the field of human rights. The Committee was operational and was present in the meeting. Its staff received the necessary training to support its mandate. This Committee had been in contact and coordinated with the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights.
The promulgation of the 1996 law approving the adoption of the Convention meant that this instrument was part of the national legal framework in Kuwait. A judge could invoke the Convention in the issuance of verdicts. There was no need for another process or procedure for the Convention to be part of national legislation. A new text in the legislation included a penalty for using torture to extract a confession. A new law punished every official who had acquiesced to a request of torture.
Any official or service provider who inflicted physical or mental harm against a person or their family members, or forced them to provide statements thereof, could be found guilty of torture. The punishment was a sentence of not more than five years and not less than 5,000 dinars. There was also a criminalisation of discrimination in connection with torture. If torture led to death, then a person was charged with the crime of a deliberate murder. The sentence was then death, and there was no harsher punishment.
The Public Prosecutor conducted investigations and interrogations into charges of torture. Defendants could deny such charges. Everything took place under the supervision of the courts. A defendant could adhere to the invalidity of such a confession. If a confession was obtained under torture, then it was dismissed by the court. The court resorted to many principles related to the invalidity of confessions extracted under torture. In a case when a police officer had forced a defendant to provide a confession, the defendant was acquitted. Acquittal was premised on the examination of evidence in the case.
If a detainee requested a medical evacuation, medical care was provided under the supervision of the police. Anyone sentenced to imprisonment had their names recorded in an electronic system which was supervised by multiple agencies. If their detention period exceeded the terms stipulated in the law, there was a notification, and those in charge were held accountable.
Judicial safeguards were in place, including that the individual had the right to know the reason for their arrest. If the individual could not appoint a lawyer, the State had the right to appoint a lawyer for them. All questioning should be done by specialist bodies, and it was up to the judge to release the person or keep them in detention. Detainees could appeal at any stage of the judgement. Questioning could only be conducted by trained, specialised staff, not just the police. The accused individual had the right to request an examination to ensure there were no injuries, which needed to be included in the investigation report. The arrested individual had the possibility of appointing somebody to witness this.
Judges needed to be fully competent and qualified in the field of law or Sharia and did not have the right to exercise political activities. Judges could not be removed from their posts unless disciplinary measures were issued against them. If judges were related to the accused by four degrees, they were required to recuse themselves from proceedings. The Ministry of Justice could not get involved in daily cases or the running of the judiciary. They could recommend the appointment of judges when necessary. Kuwait had chosen to ensure a separation of powers. The judiciary was fully independent; there was no involvement from the executive or the parliament in the judiciary.
Currently, there were no persons subject to a decision of exile or expulsion. If such a decision was taken, it was implemented in cooperation with the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, allowing the affected persons to be supported. All foreign individuals could not be exonerated from fines imposed upon them. Any individual who had received fines was obliged to pay them before being deported. In cases where people were unable to pay the fines, they could pay them subsequently in cooperation with third parties.
Responses by the Delegation
The delegation said the definition of the crime of torture was challenging, as there was a need to define what behaviours constituted torture. For example, if an individual was compelled to disclose information under duress, this could equate to torture, even if they were not subject to physical constraint. One did not have to be the perpetrator of torture to be covered by the acts under the law; individuals could be sanctioned as a standby witness. Any physical act of torture was a crime and the Kuwaiti legislator had established as a minimum threshold, a three-year imprisonment. If the acts committed had long-term impacts and were severe, the sanctions would be increased. Pre-mediated crimes could be punished by life imprisonment or the death penalty. The crime of torture was an absolute crime, and mitigating circumstances could not be used to downplay or excuse acts of torture.
Awareness campaigns had been rolled out on national radio and television stations to make the public aware of the serious nature of the act of torture. Social media networks had published advertisements and short awareness-raising videos and clips. The campaign aimed to ensure that violence was not seen as mainstream or normal, whether in schools or in the family. All channels were used to repeat this point. A robust checking system was in place to monitor campaigns and check results. Steps were taken to ensure unjustified violence was never promoted or mainstreamed, and to crack down on misinformation which could foster unrest and discrimination. Producers who violated requirements were held accountable. There were rare cases where scenes of violence had been broadcast, for example during the COVID-19 pandemic. These were immediately followed up on and assessed, and action was taken to hold those responsible to account.
Initiatives had been conducted to be conducive to awareness raising in schools, to ensure victims of violence could have access to support. All measures were taken to support the psychological wellbeing of women. Around 60 clinics provided women victims of violence with psychological support. Specialised non-governmental organizations worked with victims of domestic violence and conducted training for self-defence. Each State had rules for interrogation and treating any person who was under arrest, in such a way to ensure there were no acts of torture involved. There first needed to be a medical observation of the entire body of the arrested person prior to interrogation, and they were then given the opportunity to meet with a lawyer. If the arrested person did not speak Arabic, they would receive the support of an interpreter.
In the cases of detention, the detainee was entitled to all communication tools, access to a lawyer, and the ability to communicate with their family members to inform about their whereabouts. All cases involving compensation for acts of torture were actioned through a special administration. From 2020 to 2023, there were only nine torture complaints. Torture was not considered a phenomenon or a scourge in Kuwait.
The National Bureau for Human Rights conducted training and developed content to disseminate a general culture about human rights, and also contributed to building programmes on human rights training in schools. The protection and promotion of human rights was promoted through a website, social media networks, and awareness raising campaigns. This year, the Bureau participated in a conference on local and regional initiatives for human rights. The Bureau supported rehabilitation and penitentiary centres and could conduct visits to places of detention, women’s shelters, and other institutions without any clearance needed. Investigations against the police were conducted in the event of complaints. If it was found that these complaints were legitimate, sanctions were imposed, including the loss of salary or job.
Twenty-one memorandums of understanding had been signed with other countries to govern the issue of domestic workers. Kuwait heeded its commitments under the International Labour Organization conventions. A hotline was provided to all workers, enabling them to file complaints at any time. One hundred and fifty-three inspection campaigns had been conducted in July. Seven violations against domestic workers had been recorded in 2024.
Any domestic worker could request a change of employment without requiring the approval of their previous employer. An awareness campaign which targeted domestic workers was being rolled out, focused on raising awareness for current and prospective domestic workers about their rights, as well as promoting the hotlines and contact points they might need.
Being held incommunicado in isolation cells could only be imposed in specific circumstances, for example if the person was self-harming while in detention. The death penalty was one of last instance, the maximum penalty issued in the Criminal Code of Kuwait. It was only enacted for the most serious crimes and was not in contradiction with Islamic Sharia. At any stage of proceedings, the accused murderer could appeal, or ask for a lighter or reduced sentence, rather than the death penalty. From 2022 to 2024, there were 80 penalties reduced from the death penalty to a lighter sentence, with people even being released in some cases. In the case of a woman who was pregnant, the death penalty could not be carried out until the child was born. Minors could not be subjected to the death penalty.
The crime of rape was defined with the non-presence of consent. Consent was a constant, including in a marriage. If consent had not been given, this was recognised as being a rape and was defined as a rape in the Criminal Code. If marital rape occurred, this was criminalised and the perpetrator was punished. This relied on the woman registering a complaint of rape. The existing legislation in Kuwait did meet the requisite standards. The sanctions and punishments were commensurate with the degree of harm suffered.
Crimes of sexual violence had multiplied, including rape and non-consensual sexual relationships with minors. Some of the sentences handed down for these cases were life imprisonment, with the minimum sentences being 15 years in certain circumstances. This highlighted that the justice system was working as it should in Kuwait, with perpetrators being duly sanctioned.
The State did not currently intend to lift its reservations to the Convention, as doing this would pose a risk to the State’s sovereignty. Any detainee who had health concerns where their lives were at risk were assessed by doctors, and in some cases could be provided with a conditional release.
The Government was continuing its tireless efforts to address the issue of stateless persons. An action plan had been adopted which served as a roadmap. There were 10,260 stateless persons in Kuwait who were currently in the regularisation process. People undergoing this process received long-term resident permits and received medical insurance cards.
Kuwait guaranteed the right to freedom of expression and peaceful assembly. The country had signed 15 extradition agreements, which were bilateral agreements between Kuwait and third parties. In the event no treaty was in place, Kuwait referred to the principle of reciprocity.
Laws and regulations punished terrorist acts and crimes, money laundering, and the financing of terrorism. Kuwait had a specialised department on combatting terrorism, money laundering and terrorism financing. Twenty-eight terrorist cases had been registered over the past four years. Thirty-five inmates currently were being held in prison for being associated with a group which presented a threat to the nation.
Kuwait had rehabilitation and mental health follow-up programmes for persons in institutions, which allowed these persons to avoid relapse. Therapy sessions were conducted, in which persons were evaluated at the psycho-social level and evaluated from a general risk perspective before they were discharged. A social and family integration programme was in place for persons with disabilities. Allowances were provided for personal assistants and drivers. Five hundred and eighteen persons were in social care institutions. These included persons with severe psychological and motor disabilities.
Questions by Committee Experts
ABDUL RAZZAQ RAWAN, Committee Expert and Rapporteur for Kuwait, said torture was a serious and grave crime within international human rights law. Therefore, it was absurd that there were no provisions thereon, and the Committee insisted on this. Mr. Rawan commended the provisions in the civic law of Kuwait, which provided for reparations. Could the delegation explain in detail the course of the reforms undertaken by Kuwait? Were there any special education programmes to support the Convention among law enforcement officers?
All countries were recommended to provide training in the provisions of the Istanbul Protocol. Did Kuwait provide such training? Was there a law which governed the use of forensic medicine in Kuwait? The Convention considered mechanisms monitoring deprivation of liberty as an effective means to combat torture. It was hoped that Kuwait would ratify the Optional Protocol to the Convention. Regarding fundamental legal safeguards, it was vital for family members to be notified of one’s place of detention. Could clarifications be provided on whether this was complied with?
PETER VEDEL KESSING, Committee Expert and Rapporteur, commended Kuwait for all the positive measures taken, including new laws and regulations to prevent torture. It was understood that the State was willing to tighten the penalty for torture to more than five years, which was commensurate with the gravity of the crime. This was commendable. What was to process from here on? When could it be hoped that there would be changes? Would the Government apply for international accreditation for the National Bureau for Human Rights? Was it common to have video or audio recordings of police interrogations? If there were allegations against a police officer, who would investigate that complaint?
Could a domestic worker easily terminate a contract with a month’s notice, or were they always required to supply a reason? It was encouraging to learn that Kuwait was considering a ban on the use of shackles. Could the State be more specific on the timeline? Had the new prison been built to tackle the issue of overcrowding? Could updated statistics be provided on deaths in custody? Had deaths in custody been investigated? What measures were being taken to prevent these kinds of deaths?
Responses by the Delegation
The delegation said sovereignty was a sensitive issue, all the more so when international texts and treaties departed from national legislation. The State of Kuwait was firmly resolved to prosecute and punish any act of torture, irrespective of the perpetrator of that act. The law on protection from corporal punishment 2020 expressly prohibited any act of violence against a child. A unit was set up which responded to complaints of ill treatment against children, including corporal punishment. Immediate investigations were launched into allegations of abuse in schools. Any report of abuse needed to be followed up on immediately.
The Office of the Prosecutor was mandated to prosecute crimes brought before it, including torture. Once the Office was seized with a case of torture, an effective streamlined system ensured a rapid investigation into the reported case of torture. The Public Prosecutor’s Office was also an independent, oversight body which enacted measures to ensure oversight of places of deprivation of liberty. Since 2009, it had the right to carry out visits to verify the conditions of places of deprivation of liberty. The visits were also used to ensure that there were not acts tantamount to torture, ill treatment or abuse being carried out.
If an act of torture had led to a loss of life, the sentence would be toughened up to the death penalty. If a doctor believed a patient in hospital ran the risk of being tortured, they would report it to the police unit in the hospital which would take legal measures against the perpetrator.
Around 53,000 domestic workers had changed careers to jobs in the public sector. When a suspect or defendant was under interrogation, they were informed of their rights. Twenty-two cases of detention without grounds between 2020 and 2024 had been referred to the competent judicial authorities, who referred the cases to the competent courts. A decree regulated the suspension of a police officer, following reports of excessive use of force.
A study was being conducted to amend the article in regard to the use of discipline of inmates. It was hoped that this amendment would see the light of day, and the article would then be in line with the Mandela and Bangkok Rules. Remand in custody was limited by law and could not be extended. The provision of a hotline was a safeguard, which was open to Kuwaitis or non-Kuwaitis to lodge any abuse of their rights, including complaints against police officers. Kuwait would recommend that the National Bureau for Human Rights seek accreditation under the Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions.
Question by a Committee Expert
ABDUL RAZZAQ RAWAN, Committee Expert and Rapporteur for Kuwait, said the judiciary had a fundamental role in preventing torture and implementing the provisions of the Convention. It was hoped the State would take into account shortcomings which could impact the work of the judges and judiciary into account.
Responses by the Delegation
The delegation said the judicial authority in Kuwait was fully independent of the executive and legislative authority; these were separate powers. In practice, there was no interference whatsoever. Rules might imply an interference, but in practice, this was not the reality. The Kuwaiti judiciary and the Office of the Prosecutor General were fully independent from a technical standpoint.
Closing Remarks
CLAUDE HELLER, Committee Chairperson, thanked the delegation for the dialogue which had been very constructive. The Convention was respectful of sovereignty. The Committee aimed to contribute to the improvement of human rights in all States.
NASER ALHAYEN, Permanent Representative of Kuwait to the United Nations Office at Geneva and head of the delegation, thanked the Committee for the dialogue. Kuwait was fully committed to the implementation of all international standards and human rights and would continue the constructive dialogue with the Committee and the international community.
Produced by the United Nations Information Service in Geneva for use of the media;
not an official record. English and French versions of our releases are different as they are the product of two separate coverage teams that work independently.
CAT24.019E