Category: KB

  • MIL-OSI USA: Attorney General Bonta Announces $7.5 Million Settlement with Walmart for Illegal Disposal of Hazardous Waste and Medical Waste

    Source: US State of California

    OAKLAND – California Attorney General Rob Bonta today announced a settlement with Walmart, resolving allegations that the retail corporation unlawfully disposed hazardous waste and medical waste from their facilities statewide to municipal landfills. As part of the settlement, Walmart will be required to pay $7.5 million in penalties and costs and comply with injunctive terms. Attorney General Bonta is joined by the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) and the district attorneys of Alameda, Fresno, Monterey, Orange, Riverside, Sacramento, San Bernardino, San Diego, San Joaquin, Solano, Tulare, and Yolo Counties in today’s settlement.

    Walmart’s illegal disposal of hazardous and medical waste not only violated California laws, but, if left unchecked, posed a threat to human health and the environment. As a result of this investigation and lawsuit, Walmart has taken significant steps to prevent such disposals from happening in the future. This settlement will ensure that Walmart takes the necessary steps to ensure that its hazardous waste is handled and disposed of as required by law,” said Attorney General Bonta. “At the California Department of Justice, we will continue to hold any entity accountable for violating our environmental laws. I’m grateful to the Department of Toxic Substances Control and district attorneys statewide for their partnership in reaching this important settlement.”

    “This settlement is the result of DTSC’s strict enforcement of hazardous waste laws designed to protect public health and the environment,” said Katherine M. Butler, MPH, Director of DTSC. “Holding Walmart accountable for this violation of improper hazardous waste disposal sends a clear message: all corporations must adhere to the environmental laws that protect Californians, without exception. This settlement emphasizes the strength of our law enforcement partnerships across all levels of government and DTSC’s commitment to holding any and all violators responsible.” 

    “With this settlement, Walmart has demonstrated its understanding of the critical importance of environmental responsibility by taking meaningful steps to address concerns and ensure compliance with state standards,” said San Joaquin County District Attorney Ron Freitas. “We value their efforts in not only maintaining a cleaner, safer environment for our community but also in continuing to be a strong partner with our office in the fight against retail theft. Together, we are making strides in safeguarding both the environment and the people of San Joaquin County.” 

    “The unlawful disposing of hazardous and medical waste creates an environmental hazard and public health threat,” said Sacramento County District Attorney Thien Ho. “This case is another example of how the District Attorney’s Office and the Attorney General’s Office can work together to protect our environment and ensure that environmental laws are followed. 

    “The mismanagement of hazardous wastes can result in fires and injuries – this judgment will help to ensure that retail businesses have appropriate policies and procedures in place to protect the safety of their employees, waste management staff, and the public,” said Monterey County District Attorney Jeannine M. Pacioni.

    “Large corporations must be held accountable when they do not follow the law and put the health and safety of Alameda County residents at risk,” said Alameda County District Attorney Pamela Price. “I commend my office’s Consumer Justice Bureau’s active involvement in this investigation which helped bring this settlement forward and holds Walmart to account.”  

    “The protection of the health and safety of the people of our community and the environment are top priorities for our office. The illegal disposal and mismanagement of hazardous waste by employees pose serious risks to the environment, public health, and worker safety,” said Orange County District Attorney Todd Spitzer.  “We will continue to work with our prosecution partners around the state to protect the public by holding businesses such as Walmart accountable for its violations of environmental law.”

    “This settlement brings accountability that helps to protect our environment from toxic waste,” said District Attorney Summer Stephan. “These types of investigations and settlements are a reminder to corporations that they have a responsibility to be a good steward to our environment.” 

    The settlement is the result of over 70 waste audits conducted by the district attorneys’ offices statewide and DTSC from 2015 through 2021. During those audits, the district attorneys’ offices reviewed the contents of waste that Walmart had sent from its facilities to municipal landfills and found thousands of containers of toxic aerosols and liquid wastes including spray paints, rust removers, bleach, pesticides, and medical waste, such as over-the counter drugs. The unlawful disposals are alleged to violate the Hazardous Waste Control Law, Medical Waste Management Act, and Unfair Competition Law.

    The settlement resolves the allegations above and requires Walmart to pay $7,500,000 in civil penalties and costs. The settlement also imposes injunctive terms, which require Walmart to hire an independent, third-party auditor to conduct three annual rounds of waste audits at its facilities throughout California during the next four years. Walmart’s auditor must use specific requirements set forth in the settlement to ensure that the waste is thoroughly and accurately reviewed and characterized, and the audit results must be shared with the Attorney General’s Office, the Department of Toxic Substances Control, and the district attorneys involved in this settlement. 

    A copy of the complaint and proposed stipulated judgment, which details the aforementioned settlement terms and remains subject to court approval, can be found here and here.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: NASA Wallops to Support October Sounding Rocket Launch

    Source: NASA

    NASA’s Wallops Flight Facility in Virginia is scheduled to support the launch of a suborbital sounding rocket for the U.S. Department of Defense during a launch window that runs 5 p.m. to 11 p.m. EDT each day from Wednesday, Oct. 23 to Friday, Oct. 25.

    No real-time launch status updates will be available. The launch will not be livestreamed nor will launch status updates be provided during the countdown. The Wallops Visitor Center will be closed to the public.

    The rocket launch is expected to be visible from the Chesapeake Bay region.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Enhancing Coverage of Preventive Services Under the Affordable Care Act Proposed Rules

    Source: US Department of Health and Human Services

    Introduction

    On October 21, 2024, the Departments of Health and Human Services, Labor, and of the Treasury (collectively, the Departments) released proposed rules with comment period entitled “Enhancing Coverage of Preventive Services Under the Affordable Care Act.” These proposed rules would expand access to coverage of recommended preventive services without cost sharing in the commercial market, with a particular focus on reducing barriers to coverage of contraceptive services, including over-the-counter (OTC) contraceptives.

    Background

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Secretary of Defense Lloyd J. Austin III Meets With Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in Kyiv

    Source: United States Department of Defense

    UKRAINIAN PRESIDENT VOLODYMYR ZELENSKYY: Thank you very much, dear Secretary Austin. Your colleagues, thank you very much. General Cavoli, thank you very much for coming. And first of all, thank you, American people, President Biden and bipartisan support. We are very thankful for all the support from the United States that’s been done for Ukraine from the very beginning of this war.

    Thank you so much, and thank you for the last hour meeting in Brussels on the platform of the Ukraine NATO Council. Thank you so much. That was an opportunity to make a direct dialog with the ministers of defense of our allies. And after that, I know that it was a very good meeting on the level of ministers, defense ministers of G7+. Thank you so much.

    According to our last dialog, I think very positive dialog with President Biden by phone, we discussed a lot of things. And by the way, thanks for the last package supporting our soldiers. And we discussed a lot of important things about victory plan, about preparing for winter with our air defense capabilities, how to strengthen all this. And we discussed also some details which will be, I think, sorry, out of — came about next packages which are crucial for us, especially now this challenging winter period.

    So — and we discuss all this with the president. I want to continue. Maybe we will have some results — no, I’m sure that we will have some important results. You’re very welcome. Again, thank you.

    SECRETARY OF DEFENSE LLOYD AUSTIN: Mr. President, it’s great to see you again. Thanks for hosting us here in Kyiv. I’m honored to be back in Ukraine for my fourth visit as secretary of defense. And under your leadership, Ukraine has fought valiantly to defend its democracy, its sovereignty and its citizens.

    The United States understands the stakes here, Mr. President. The outcome of Putin’s war of choice matters to us and to the entire world, and that’s why I continue to convene the Ukraine Defense Contact Group. You saw the contact group first hand last month at Ramstein Air Base. We’ve moved heaven and earth to help Ukraine, and that inspiring coalition of more than 50 allies and partners continues to stand united to provide your country with the security assistance that Ukraine needs to prevail.

    Under President Biden’s leadership, the United States remains committed to keeping up this support. And so, I’m pleased to announce today the commitment of a $400 million presidential drawdown package to provide your forces with additional munitions, armored vehicles and anti-tank weapons.

    While the focus on Ukraine’s immediate needs goes on, we’re also committed to sustaining your support as pledged in the bilateral security agreement that you and President Biden signed in July.

    So, I look forward to a good discussion today, Mr. President, and to hearing your thoughts on how to further strengthen our strategic partnership. Thank you again, Mr. President, and it’s great to be here with you.

    PRESIDENT ZELENSKYY: Thank you.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Casten Leads Bipartisan Effort to Improve Investment Tax Credit for Geothermal Heat Pumps

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Representative Sean Casten (IL-06)

    October 22, 2024

    Washington, D.C. — U.S. Congressman Sean Casten (IL-06) led a bipartisan group of lawmakers in urging Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen to revise the proposed rule for an investment tax credit (ITC) to ensure Americans can benefit from the energy and cost savings provided by geothermal heat pump (GHP) technology.

    “The NPRM [Notice of Proposed Rulemaking] prevents multiple taxpayers that own different components of a GHP that are functionally interdependent from claiming a tax credit under the ITC. We believe this proposed rule misapplies congressional intent and creates difficulties for taxpayers in their ability to benefit from the credit,” the lawmakers wrote. “To ensure that Americans can appropriately benefit from the energy and cost savings provided by GHP systems, Treasury should modify the proposed rule to ensure that different taxpayers who own separate, functionally independent components of a GHP system are eligible to claim the ITC for the equipment they own.”

    GHP systems are among the most efficient ways to heat and cool buildings, with enormous potential to both lower energy bills and reduce carbon emissions. 

    In addition to Rep. Casten, the letter was signed by Reps. Larry Bucshon, Nanette Diaz Barragán, Nikki Budzinski, Lori Trahan, Betty McCollum, Mike Quigley, Becca Balint, Joseph Morelle, Paul Tonko, Chellie Pingree, and Rosa DeLauro.

    A copy of the letter can be found here, and text of the letter can be found below.

    Dear Secretary Yellen:

    We write in response to the Treasury Department’s (“Treasury”) Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Reg- 132569-17 (“NPRM”) for the investment tax credit (“ITC”) under Section 48 of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended (“Code”) and underscore the impact the regulation would have on the expanded deployment of geothermal heat pump (“GHP”) system technology. In particular, the NPRM prevents multiple taxpayers that own different components of a GHP that are functionally interdependent from claiming a tax credit under the ITC. We believe this proposed rule misapplies congressional intent and creates difficulties for taxpayers in their ability to benefit from the credit.

    Correcting the proposed regulation in the final rule is critical for home-based and community scale GHP systems which, by design, typically involve multiple owners. GHP networks can serve a diverse array of customer buildings while those customers own and maintain their own GHP equipment within the building.

    GHP systems are among the most efficient ways to heat and cool buildings and GHP deployment holds enormous potential to lower energy bills for American families and businesses and reduce emissions from heating and cooling homes, schools, and businesses. Due to their reliable performance during temperature extremes, GHP systems provide households with certainty in their energy bills and insulate consumers from peak energy price shocks due to extreme weather events.

    A December 2023 report from the Department of Energy’s Oak Ridge National Laboratory confirms that GHPs are a ready-made strategy for decarbonizing buildings, reducing the need for new electricity generation and transmission infrastructure, and bringing energy savings to Americans nationwide. According to DOE’s report, broad adoption of GHPs would result in cumulative savings to the U.S. economy of more than $1 trillion by 2050, eliminating the need for 24,500 miles of transmission lines, creating a 13 percent decrease in the amount of required electricity generation, and a reducing CO2 emission by 7,351 million metric tons.

    As drafted, the NPRM prevents multiple taxpayers who own different components of a GHP that are functionally interdependent from claiming a tax credit under the ITC. This is based on Treasury’s interpretation that the ground loop and the GHP units are functionally interdependent yet distinct components of the same system (unless the two taxpayers share more than 50 percent overlapping ownership of the equipment). This interpretation contravenes the plain text of Section 48, which permits the owner of energy property to claim the ITC when the original use of that energy property began with such owner. With the enactment of the Inflation Reduction Act, Congress gave much overdue recognition to GHP systems by granting the technology the same credit as the other ITC-eligible technologies.

    To ensure that Americans can appropriately benefit from the energy and cost savings provided by GHP systems, Treasury should modify the proposed rule to ensure that different taxpayers who own separate, functionally independent components of a GHP system are eligible to claim the ITC for the equipment they own.

    The proposed rule also creates a new trap for taxpayers who may believe they own an entire unit of energy property and are eligible for the ITC but are later deemed ineligible due to a finding by the IRS. This makes the ITC less flexible and would pose an increased risk for taxpayers, likely disincentivizing private sector investments in GHP and other ITC-eligible projects. Additionally, the final rule should allow individual items of energy property to qualify for the ITC even when they are placed into service after other related energy property. This level of flexibility will further incentivize the widespread investment in and adoption of GHP systems.

    To ensure the maximum deployment of GHP systems, we urge Treasury to incorporate the above changes in any final rule on the Section 48 ITC tax credit issued by the agency.

    Thank you for your attention to this important matter.

    # # #

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Congressman Neguse Hosts 5th Annual App-A-Thon

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Joe Neguse (D-Co 2)

    Pictured Above: Congressman Neguse and community professionals at BAE Systems in Boulder, Colorado—discussing student ideas for potential app submissions.

    Lafayette, CO — On Saturday, House Assistant Minority Leader Joe Neguse hosted his fifth annual App-A-Thon, to help middle and high school-aged students in Colorado’s 2nd District prepare their submissions for the 2024 Congressional App Challenge. Students were joined by professionals from BAE Systems and received helpful tips and feedback from expert coders as they refined their app submissions. They also had the opportunity to engage with employees and other STEM professionals, gaining insights into tech-related opportunities in Colorado.

    “Year after year, I am continually impressed by the dedication and creativity of the students who participate in our annual App-A-Thon. And as Colorado’s technology and innovation sectors continue to thrive, I am more confident than ever that these students have a bright future ahead of them,” said Congressman Neguse. “A big thank you to all of the students, teaching staff, and tech experts who joined us—looking forward to seeing this year’s final submissions.”

    The deadline to submit an app for this year’s challenge is Thursday, October 24th, 2024 at 10:00 pm MT. Apps may be submitted through the office website, here.

    The Congressional App Challenge is open to all middle and high schoolers in Colorado’s 2nd Congressional District. It was officially launched by the U.S. House of Representatives in 2015 and is a nationwide effort allowing students to compete against their peers by creating an application (also known as an “app”) for desktop/PC, web, tablet, mobile, raspberry Pi, or other devices.  

    ###

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Security: Yellowknife — Yellowknife RCMP respond to armed robbery

    Source: Royal Canadian Mounted Police

    On the evening of October 1st, Yellowknife RCMP responded to a report of an armed robbery. Two male subjects were reported to have approached a victim as they were exiting their vehicle and demanded the keys while brandishing a knife. The subjects then fled in the vehicle.

    The vehicle and suspects remain at large.

    The stolen vehicle is described as a 2017 Mercedes Benz C-Class sedan, silver in color, bearing NT licence plate 368137.

    One suspect, who reportedly concealed his face, is described as being a black male of very thin build, approximately 5’11” tall wearing black pants and a grey or black coat.

    The second suspect is described as being a black male of medium build, approximately 5’8″ tall, with hair styled into corn rows.

    Anyone with information on the whereabouts of the vehicle or suspects is asked not to approach, but to contact the Yellowknife RCMP at 669-1111 or Crime Stoppers at http://www.p3tips.com. In the event of an emergency call, 911.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Security: Yellowknife — Yellowknife RCMP investigating vandalized police, municipal enforcement vehicles

    Source: Royal Canadian Mounted Police

    On September 29th, 2024, it was discovered that four Municipal enforcement vehicles and one marked RCMP police vehicle had been spray painted at City Hall and the RCMP detachment respectively. A lone subject appears to have been responsible for all five vandalized vehicles.

    The matter remains under investigation at this time. No arrests have been made.

    Anyone who has information is asked to contact the Yellowknife RCMP at 669-1111 or Crime Stoppers at http://www.p3tips.com. In the event of an emergency call, 911.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Security: Norman Wells — Norman Wells RCMP charge second suspect in weekend assaults

    Source: Royal Canadian Mounted Police

    On September 22nd, 2024, Norman Wells RCMP responded to an altercation at a residence in the community which resulted in serious injuries and involved the use of weapons. A press release was issued on September 24th, 2024 detailing that officers had taken 23-year-old Teagan Sutherland into custody in relation to the matter.

    Since the issuing of the aforementioned press release, Norman Wells RCMP have now charged a second suspect in the altercation, 24-year-old Dallas McCauley, with the following:

    • Breaking and entering with intent, contrary to section 348(1)(a) of the Criminal Code
    • Aggravated assault, contrary to section 268(2) of the Criminal Code
    • Disguised with intent to commit an offence, contrary to section 351(2) of the Criminal Code
    • Possession of a weapon for a dangerous purpose (2 counts), contrary to section 88(1) of the Criminal Code

    A warrant has been issued for the arrest of McCauley, who is believed to be hiding in the community.

    At the time of the altercation, McCauley was already subject to an arrest warrant for prior offences, including Uttering threats and Failure to comply with a probation order.

    Norman Wells RCMP are asking anyone with information on McCauley’s whereabouts not to approach him and to contact the detachment at 587-1111 or Crimestoppers at http://www.p3tips.com.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Security: Hay River — Hay River RCMP dismantle illicit cannabis grow

    Source: Royal Canadian Mounted Police

    In August of 2024, Hay River RCMP officers responded to a call for service at a residence in Hay River. While in attendance at the residence, officers noted a large number of cannabis plants on the property.

    On September 6th, 2024, after receiving judicial authorization, officers attended the residence again and executed a search warrant under the authority of the Cannabis Act. 40 cannabis plants were seized, ten times what is currently permitted under the Cannabis Act.

    A 70-year-old Hay River man has been charged with possessing more than four cannabis plants, contrary to section 8(1) of the Cannabis Act, and will appear in court at a later date.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Security: Fishers Woman Facing Federal Charges for Fraud and Forging Signature of a Federal Judge

    Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) State Crime News

    INDIANAPOLIS— A federal grand jury has returned an indictment charging Christi Lee Dodd, 51, of Fishers, Indiana, with wire fraud and forging the signature of a federal judge. 

    According to the court documents, Dodd first filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy in the Southern District of Indiana in January 2015. In April 2015, a federal bankruptcy judge issued a signed discharge order releasing Dodd from liability for any remaining debts not resolved in the bankruptcy proceedings.

    In December 2019, Dodd again filed for Chapter 13 bankruptcy in the Southern District of Indiana, but later decided not to proceed and moved to have the 2019 case dismissed. In June 2022, the bankruptcy court dismissed Dodd’s 2019 bankruptcy petition. The court did not issue a discharge order in the 2019 case, and none of Dodd’s unpaid debts were resolved.

    In 2023, Dodd allegedly created and forged a discharge order purporting to absolve her of debts related to her 2019 Chapter 13 bankruptcy petition. Dodd emailed the fraudulent document to a financial institution purportedly proving that she had received a discharge in her 2019 bankruptcy case so that she could obtain a line of credit to pay outstanding debts owed by the trucking business she owned.

    The emailed document was purportedly filed in Dodd’s second bankruptcy case with the heading, “DISCHARGE OF DEBTOR IN A CHAPTER 13 CASE.” As alleged in the indictment, the forged document was in fact created by Dodd using the discharge order from her first bankruptcy under Chapter 7 and contained the forged signature of the judge who issued the 2015 discharge order.

    “Protecting the integrity and efficiency of the bankruptcy system is an important priority of the Department of Justice. Our office is committed to working closely with our partners at the U.S. Trustee Program to uphold the law and protect the interests of debtors and creditors,” said Zachary A. Myers, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Indiana.

    “The filing of a fraudulent court order containing the forged signature of a bankruptcy judge strikes at the very core of the integrity of the bankruptcy system and will not be tolerated,” said Nancy J. Gargula, United States Trustee for Indiana and the Central and Southern Districts of Illinois (Region 10).  “We are grateful for U.S. Attorney Myers and our law enforcement partners for their commitment to protect the integrity of the bankruptcy process in the Southern District of Indiana., as demonstrated by this indictment.”

    The FBI and U.S. Trustee’s Office is investigating this case in collaboration with the Southern District of Indiana Bankruptcy Fraud Working Group. The United States Trustee Program is the component of the Department of Justice responsible for overseeing the administration of bankruptcy cases and litigating to enforce the bankruptcy laws. If convicted, Dodd faces up to twenty-five years in federal prison.

    U.S. Attorney Myers thanked Assistant U.S. Attorney Adam Eakman, who is prosecuting this case.

    An indictment is merely an allegation. All defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.

    ###

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI USA: Opening of $1.2B Mixed-Use Development on Long Island

    Source: US State of New York

    Governor Kathy Hochul today celebrated the grand opening of Station Yards, a state-of-the-art, mixed-use development in Ronkonkoma, Suffolk County on Long Island. Station Yards, also known as the Ronkonkoma Hub, is a transformative transit-oriented development spanning 53 acres around the Ronkonkoma Long Island Rail Road station. The $1.2 billion project, led by TRITEC Real Estate Company, is revitalizing the area by integrating housing, office and retail spaces, creating a dynamic urban center that caters to modern living and working needs. This development showcases New York State’s commitment to fostering sustainable economic growth, enhancing community vibrancy and setting new standards for smart, transit-oriented urban planning across Long Island and beyond.

    “Station Yards represents a new chapter in Long Island’s growth story and exemplifies our vision for vibrant, sustainable communities across New York State,” Governor Hochul said. “This project is not just about building apartments and offices – it’s about creating a dynamic ecosystem where people can live, work and thrive. By investing in mixed-use developments like Station Yards, we’re addressing housing needs, creating jobs, and laying the foundation for long-term economic prosperity in our communities.”

    Empire State Development President, CEO and Commissioner Hope Knight said, “Station Yards is a game-changer for Long Island’s economy, embodying our vision for innovative, transit-oriented developments that catalyze growth. With substantial support from ESD, this project is set to create thousands of jobs and establish a new standard for sustainable, community-focused development. Station Yards exemplifies how strategic investments can transform communities and drive economic progress, serving as a blueprint for future developments across New York State.”

    TRITEC Principal Jim Coughlan said, “Public investment has been instrumental in bringing Station Yards to life, and we are grateful for the strong backing from Governor Hochul and Empire State Development. Without this critical support, our commitment of over $400 million in private capital to Ronkonkoma would not have been possible. This investment is creating much-needed housing and transforming the area into a new destination at Long Island’s only true multi-modal site, fostering a vibrant, connected community.”

    Station Yards is taking shape in phases around one of Long Island’s key transportation hubs. Upon completion, it will encompass 1,450 residential units, 360,000 square feet of office space, and 195,000 square feet of retail space. The first phase, Alston Station Yards, delivered 489 residential units in 2020. The second phase, The Core, will introduce an additional 388 homes, expand retail and office spaces by 67,000 and 16,500 square feet respectively, and feature a public plaza alongside more than 1,200 parking spaces.

    Situated at a crucial intersection of transportation networks, the development benefits from its proximity to Exit 60 of the Long Island Expressway and Long Island MacArthur Airport. It also leverages its proximity to the Ronkonkoma LIRR station — Suffolk County’s busiest and Long Island’s second-busiest — which serves 17,000 daily commuters with express routes to both Penn Station and Grand Central Station. This strategic location enhances the project’s vision of a vibrant, walkable community where residential, commercial and public spaces seamlessly integrate.

    In 2017 Empire State Development provided support for the project with a $55 million capital grant, underscoring the State’s commitment to innovative, community-focused development. This investment is part of a broader strategy to revitalize communities across New York State through targeted, transformative projects. Station Yards is projected to generate over 10,000 construction jobs and 2,500 permanent jobs, providing a significant boost to local employment opportunities. By offering a mix of housing options near a major transit hub, the development addresses critical housing needs while advancing New York State’s goals for sustainable urban development.

    Suffolk County Executive Ed Romaine said, “Station Yards is a shining example of the smart, transit-oriented development that is needed in Suffolk County and we thank the Governor for her efforts.”

    Brookhaven Town Supervisor Dan Panico said, “Station Yards is a prime example of community supported redevelopment, robust economic vitality and appropriately placed redevelopment. The Ronkonkoma train station area, once a somewhat despondent and bleak assemblage of vacant storefronts, dirt lots and unwelcoming industrial properties, have been transformed through the efforts of the community, the project team and a town with the foresight, courage and mettle to undertake such a project and see it through. I am proud to lead Brookhaven and I remain confident that we can continue to redevelop appropriately while also preserving open spaces and farmland, understanding that both are equally important and beneficial to our future.”

    LIREDC Co-Chairs Linda Armyn and Dr. Kimberly R. Cline said, “Station Yards embodies the transformative vision at the heart of Long Island’s economic development strategy. By creating a walkable, mixed-use community centered around a major transportation hub, this project addresses multiple priorities — from expanding housing options and creating jobs to promoting sustainable growth and enhancing our region’s competitiveness. Station Yards is a testament to what we can achieve when public and private sectors collaborate to build stronger, more vibrant communities.”

    As New York continues to address the housing crisis, projects like Station Yards increase the supply of housing and help build stronger, more resilient communities. These developments showcase how public-private partnerships can transform underutilized areas into vibrant community hubs. By creating walkable, mixed-use communities near major transportation links, Station Yards and similar projects are instrumental in attracting and retaining talent, promoting sustainable growth, and fostering a more connected, prosperous future for regions like Long Island and beyond.

    Governor Hochul’s Housing Agenda

    Governor Hochul is committed to addressing New York’s housing crisis and making the State more affordable and more livable for all New Yorkers. As part of the FY25 Enacted Budget, the Governor secured a landmark agreement to increase New York’s housing supply through new tax incentives for Upstate communities, new incentives and relief from certain State-imposed restrictions to create more housing in New York City, a $500 million capital fund to build up to 15,000 new homes on state-owned property, an additional $600 million in funding to support a variety of housing developments statewide and new protections for renters and homeowners. In addition, as part of the FY23 Enacted Budget, the Governor announced a five-year, $25 billion Housing Plan to create or preserve 100,000 affordable homes statewide, including 10,000 with support services for vulnerable populations, plus the electrification of an additional 50,000 homes. More than 45,000 homes have been created or preserved to date. The FY25 Enacted Budget also strengthened the Pro-Housing Community Program, which the Governor launched in 2023. Pro-Housing Certification is now a requirement for localities to access up to $650 million in discretionary funding. To date, more than 200 communities have been certified, including the town of Brookhaven.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Governor Cooper Announces Environmental Justice Advisory Council Report Outlining Dozens of Recommendations to Advance Environmental Justice in North Carolina

    Source: US State of North Carolina

    Headline: Governor Cooper Announces Environmental Justice Advisory Council Report Outlining Dozens of Recommendations to Advance Environmental Justice in North Carolina

    Governor Cooper Announces Environmental Justice Advisory Council Report Outlining Dozens of Recommendations to Advance Environmental Justice in North Carolina
    mseets

    Today, Governor Roy Cooper announced the release of the Governor’s Environmental Justice Advisory Council report, representing a significant step towards addressing Environmental Justice (EJ) concerns in North Carolina. This comprehensive report comes as a result of the reestablishment of the Secretary of Environmental Quality’s Environmental Justice and Equity Advisory Board in October 2023 by Governor Cooper’s Executive Order No. 292.

    The Council’s report contains 14 bold recommendations to advance environmental justice and ensures state agencies incorporate environmental justice in future decision-making processes. The report also includes over 40 recommendations from the Council’s Environmental Justice Hub and Mapping Tool, Cumulative Impacts, Community Engagement, and Training subcommittees.

    “As the birthplace of the environmental justice movement, North Carolina is working to level the playing field for impacted communities and preserve and protect our natural lands and resources,” said Governor Cooper. “This report provides important recommendations that will help identify and address environmental justice challenges across our state.”

    Executive Order 292 directs a whole-of-government approach and instructs the Governor’s Office and Cabinet agencies to incorporate environmental justice considerations into their policies and programs to the extent permitted by law. It also encourages Cabinet agencies to use the statewide environmental justice mapping tool. Since the signing of EO 292, The Council has actively engaged with affected communities, holding council meetings in Wayne, Halifax, and Stanley counties and participating in a tour of the West Badin community. The Council’s Environmental Justice Hub and Mapping Tool, and Public Engagement Subcommittees have held virtual and in-person meetings to gather public feedback on the directives in the Executive Order, ensuring that the voices of the people are heard and valued in this process. Cabinet agencies have worked to incorporate EJ into policies and programs. Cabinet agencies draft EJ goals, incorporating public and Council feedback. The Department of Information Technology lead the development of the Environmental Justice Hub, a central location for EJ information, including awarded grants, and the Environmental Justice Mapping Tool which includes environmental, health and socioeconomic data from across departments.

    “When implemented, our recommendations constitute an evidenced-based and data-driven roadmap for achieving Environmental Justice in our state,” said Jim Johnson, PhD, EJ Advisory Council Co-Chair and Director of the Urban Investment Strategies Center at the Frank Hawkins Kenan Institute of Private Enterprise. “We want to ensure that North Carolina is a safe, healthy, and resilient place to live, work, play, and do business for all North Carolinians and support state agencies’ engagement in this work.”

    “We also initiate a framework for assessing the cumulative impacts of multiple environmental harms on many communities,” said Virginia Guidry, PhD, EJ Advisory Council Co-Chair and NCDHHS Environmental Justice Lead. “We must measure and reduce these burdens to achieve environmental justice in North Carolina.”

    The unanimously approved 14 recommendations are as follows:

    1. Creating an Office of Environmental Justice within the Governor’s Office of Public Engagement.

    2. Collaborating with EJ leaders to ensure the EJ Mapping Tool accurately reflects areas impacted by EJ issues.

    3. Creating a North Carolina-specific EJ index.

    4. Reviewing the EJ Hub and Mapping Tool for accessibility.

    5. Developing a process to review, respond to and implement input received on the EJ hub.

    6. Recommending cabinet agencies engage with community members around data collection and review.

    7. Developing a cumulative impacts guidance document.

    8. Recommending cabinet agencies review information gaps identified by the EJ Hub & Mapping Subcommittee and within their agency and provide a list of additional data they can supply; develop legislative language that authorizes such data collection and analysis, as needed.

    9. Engaging community leaders and EJ organizations in meeting planning.

    10. Seeking advice from tribal organizations and other relevant entities on the needs and best processes for engaging with these communities.

    11. Documenting and sharing public feedback and responses on public engagement events; evaluating and addressing barriers to engagement.

    12. Requiring EJ training for all state and local government employees.

    13. Cataloging and sharing EJ-relevant state resources to prevent duplication of efforts.

    14. Clarifying the definition of EJ to increase familiarity and ease of use.

    The full text of the recommendations can be found on pages 3-4 of the report.

    Read North Carolina’s Governor’s Environmental Justice Advisory Council Report here.

    Read Governor Cooper’s  Executive Order No. 292 here.

    ###

    Oct 22, 2024

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Press release – European Parliament approves more efficient and greener EU airspace

    Source: European Parliament

    On Tuesday, MEPs paved the way for improved management of European airspace, enabling more direct flights and fewer delays, and supporting climate neutrality.

    The reform of Single European Sky rules, already agreed upon in negotiations with the Council last March, strengthens national performance plans for air navigation services and will help to improve EU airspace management. These plans will have binding targets and incentives to make flights more efficient and environmentally friendly. An independent advisory Performance Review Board would be set up to help the Commission and EU member states in taking decisions on implementing these plans.

    In addition, the Commission will adopt EU performance targets on capacity, cost efficiency, climate and environmental factors for air navigation services, to be reviewed at least every three years.

    Greener air navigation charges

    MEPs secured a provision that tasks the Commission with assessing how charges levied on airspace users (airlines or private planes operators) for providing air navigation services could encourage them to become more environmentally friendly, for example by using the most fuel-efficient available routing or alternative clean propulsion technologies.

    More competition

    Another key demand of MEPs during the negotiations was to encourage competition in the air navigation services market. The new bill includes the possibility for air-traffic service providers to procure other air navigation services, such as communication, meteorological or aeronautical information services, under market conditions.

    Quotes

    “The reform is a step forward in removing bottlenecks, creating more efficient air traffic control and management, and reducing costs and emissions through shorter and safer flights, from which all European airlines, and especially European citizens, will benefit. The creation of a truly single European airspace, however, has been blocked by member states, unwilling to give up national powers for the greater good. I now call on member states to constructively implement this reform”, said EP co-rapporteur Jens Gieseke (EPP, DE).

    “Today, Europe’s airspace is like a big jigsaw puzzle where each country has its own piece, but unfortunately not all the pieces fit together. This leads to detours, waiting times and unnecessary costs. In 2023, almost three out of ten flights were delayed by more than 15 minutes. The new rules will make aviation safer, more punctual and more climate-friendly”, added EP co-rapporteur Johan Danielsson (S&D, SE) and also thanked former rapporteurs Marian-Jean Marinescu (EPP, Romania) and Bogusław Liberadzki (S&D, PL) for their work.

    Next steps

    Both co-legislators have now approved the new rules– the Council did so on 26 September. They will enter into force 20 days after publication in the Official Journal of the EU. While most of the provisions will apply from that date, other provisions (e.g. penalties for infringing the new rules; national supervisory authority’s independence) will only take effect two years later.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Protection of bee-keeping and primary production on the island of Evia – E-002051/2024

    Source: European Parliament

    14.10.2024

    Question for written answer  E-002051/2024
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Konstantinos Arvanitis (The Left)

    In the Regional Unit of Evia, in Greece, an intervention of enormous proportions in the natural, anthropogenic and productive environment is being carried out through the installation of a huge number of wind turbines. Specifically, although Evia accounts for barely 2.79% of Greek territory, it is host to 25.85% of the wind turbines already installed (28% of the installed capacity), a clear testament to the disproportion, unequal distribution and overall burden on the region. Moreover, forest fires (particularly in 2021) have destroyed a total of 51 200 hectares, 74% of which were forests and woodlands. The consequences of the extensive energy interventions and the forest fires are catastrophic for the environment and disincentivise any other beneficial activity in the region.

    In view of the fact that: (a) the region is home to an abundance of primary activity (bee-keeping, livestock rearing, resin tapping and logging); (b) bee-keeping is facing enormous environmental risks due to climate change and receives special protection from EU legislation; and (c) 80% of cultivated and wild plants are dependent on animal pollinators, chief among them bees:

    • 1.Has the Commission carried out checks on the compatibility of installing new wind turbines with the EU standards for the protection of bees and of the environment in general?
    • 2.If infringements of the applicable EU law are identified, how does the Commission intend to intervene?
    • 3.Does it intend to revise the regulatory framework and the energy development model to give more effective protection to the natural environment, in view of the threat posed by the climate crisis?

    Submitted: 14.10.2024

    Last updated: 22 October 2024

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Liability of online marketplaces – E-002045/2024

    Source: European Parliament

    14.10.2024

    Question for written answer  E-002045/2024
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Christel Schaldemose (S&D)

    Has the Commission checked whether the names of sellers appearing in Temu’s sales adverts are the names of real firms which can be contacted and communicated with and which are aware that they are listed as sellers of products on Temu?

    Submitted: 14.10.2024

    Last updated: 22 October 2024

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Press release – Parliament approves up to €35 billion loan to Ukraine backed by Russian assets

    Source: European Parliament

    On Tuesday, MEPs gave their green light to an extraordinary loan of up to €35 billion to Ukraine, to be repaid with future revenues from frozen Russian assets.

    With 518 votes in favour, 56 against and 61 abstentions, Parliament endorsed the new macro-financial assistance (MFA) to help Ukraine against Russia’s brutal war of aggression. This loan is the EU’s part of a G7 package agreed last June, to provide up to $50 billion (approximately €45 billion) in financial support to Ukraine. The final amount that the EU will contribute could be lower, depending on the size of the loans provided by other G7 partners.

    The Ukraine Loan Cooperation Mechanism, a newly established framework, will make future revenues from the frozen Russian Central Bank assets located in the EU available to Ukraine. These funds will help Ukraine service and repay the EU’s MFA loan as well as loans from other G7 partners. While the mechanism’s funds can be used to service and repay loans, Kyiv may allocate the MFA funds as it sees fit.

    The new MFA funds will be disbursed until the end of 2025. The loan is conditional upon Ukraine’s continued commitment to uphold effective democratic mechanisms, respect human rights, and further policy conditions to be set out in a memorandum of understanding. Additionally, the management and control systems outlined in the Ukraine Plan, along with specific measures to prevent fraud and other irregularities, will apply to the MFA loan.

    Quote

    “Ukraine continues to resist Russian aggression, with its brave citizens fighting not only for their own existence and freedom, but to defend democracy, human rights, freedom, and international law for all of us. The need for financial support is both immense and urgent. Russia must pay for attacking Ukrainians and brutally destroying the country’s infrastructure, cities, villages, and homes. The burden of rebuilding Ukraine will be shouldered by those responsible for its destruction, namely Russia,” rapporteur Karin Karlsbro (Renew, SE) said.

    Next steps

    EU governments already endorsed the proposal, and the Council plans to adopt the regulation by written procedure after Parliament’s vote. The regulation will enter into force on the day after its publication in the Official Journal of the EU.

    Background

    In September, the Commission announced a €35 billion EU loan for Ukraine as part of a plan by G7 partners to issue loans of up to $50 billion (about €45 billion). Future revenues coming from the frozen Russian state assets would finance the loans. Approximately €210 billion in assets from the Central Bank of Russia are held in the EU and remain frozen under sanctions imposed over Moscow’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. EU governments decided to set aside the profits from these assets, and use them to support both military efforts and reconstruction in Ukraine.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the People’s Republic of China’s misinterpretation of UN Resolution 2758 and its continuous military provocations around Taiwan – B10-0134/2024

    Source: European Parliament

    Markéta Gregorová, Ville Niinistö, Maria Ohisalo, Hannah Neumann, Diana Riba i Giner, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Erik Marquardt
    on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

    B10‑0134/2024

    European Parliament resolution on the People’s Republic of China’s misinterpretation of UN Resolution 2758 and its continuous military provocations around Taiwan

    (2024/2891(RSP))

    The European Parliament,

     having regard to its recommendation of 21 October 2021 to the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy on EU-Taiwan political relations and cooperation[1],

     having regard to its resolution of 7 June 2022 on the EU and the security challenges in the Indo-Pacific[2],

     having regard to its resolution of 15 September 2022 on the situation in the Strait of Taiwan[3],

     having regard to its resolution of 13 December 2023 on EU-Taiwan trade and investment relations[4],

     having regard to its recommendation of 13 December 2023 to the Council and the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy concerning EU-China relations[5],

     having regard to the joint communication of the Commission and the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy of 16 September 2021 on the EU strategy for cooperation in the Indo-Pacific (JOIN(2021)0024),

     having regard to the Strategic Compass for Security and Defence – For a European Union that protects its citizens, values and interests and contributes to international peace and security, approved by the Council on 21 March 2022 and endorsed by the European Council on 24 March 2022,

     having regard to NATO’s 2022 Strategic Concept,

     having regard to the statement by the spokesperson of the European External Action Service of 14 October 2024 on China’s latest military drills,

     having regard to the G7 Foreign Ministers’ statement of 3 August 2022 on preserving peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait,

     having regard to United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2758 (XXVI) of 25 October 1971 on the restoration of the lawful rights of the People’s Republic of China in the United Nations,

     having regard to Article 7 of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) of 9 May 1992,

     having regard to Rule 5 of the Standing Rules of Procedure of the Assembly of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO),

     having regard to Article 4 of the Constitution of the International Criminal Police Organization (Interpol),

     having regard to Article 8 and Article 18, paragraph (h), of the Constitution of the World Health Organization (WHO),

     having regard to Rule 136(2) of its Rules of Procedure,

    A. whereas the statutes of most international organisations tasked with addressing global issues including climate change, the preservation of human health and the suppression of transnational crime, such as the WHO, the UNFCCC, Interpol and the ICAO, provide opportunities for non-state entities to participate without infringing on the rights of member states;

    B. whereas the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has made instrumental use of UN Resolution 2758 as a legal basis for its position that Taiwan is part of the PRC and a foundational element of its One China principle; whereas UN Resolution 2758 does not include the words ‘Republic of China’ or ‘Taiwan’, but only states that the PRC will represent ‘China’ at the UN, and does not make any determination regarding the status of Taiwan; whereas, however, the PRC continues to misinterpret UN Resolution 2758 to block Taiwan’s meaningful participation in international organisations;

    C. whereas the EU and Taiwan are like-minded partners that share the common values of freedom, democracy, human rights and the rule of law; whereas the EU remains decisively committed to its One China policy;

    D. whereas following the Taiwanese President Lai Ching-te’s annual speech on 10 October 2024, the PRC, on 14 October 2024, conducted a comprehensive military exercise across the Taiwan Strait, amounting to the fourth round of large-scale war games in just over two years;

    E. whereas the median line, which was set up in a decades-old tacit agreement between both sides of the Taiwan Strait, was designed to reduce the risk of conflict by keeping the military aircraft from both sides of the Strait at a safe distance and thus prevent fatal miscalculations; whereas the PRC’s People’s Liberation Army violated the median line only four times between 1954 and 2020, but now routine incursions reflect Beijing’s intent to irreversibly reset long-standing benchmarks;

    F. whereas on 14 October 2024, China also deployed 17 vessels from its coast guard, which was a larger deployment than in a previous exercise held in May this year, when coast guard vessels had been deployed for the first time; whereas four formations of Chinese coast guard ships patrolled the island and briefly entered its restricted waters; whereas the very frequent deployment of coast guard ships by the PRC in the Taiwan Strait, in what they consider ‘law enforcement’ missions, sends a clear message of sovereignty from the PCR, keeps constant pressure on Taiwanese authorities and causes a dangerous increase in the risk of collisions, in what is one of the most concrete indications of China’s intention to erode the status quo;

    G. whereas full-scale military exercises by the PRC have also been coupled with cyberattacks against Taiwanese authorities and other grey-zone activities such as cognitive and legal warfare and disinformation, aimed at discouraging the Taiwanese population, eroding Taiwanese legitimate sovereign rights and, ultimately, instilling the belief that reunification is inevitable;

    H. whereas on 16 October 2024, the authorities of the PRC stated ‘We are willing to strive for the prospect of peaceful reunification with the utmost sincerity and endeavour, but we will never commit ourselves to renouncing the use of force,’ reiterating Xi Jinping’s landmark speech at the opening of the Chinese Communist Party’s 20th Party Congress in October 2022; whereas Xi Jinping also referred to permanent military pressure in the Taiwan Strait as ‘new normality’; whereas Chinese diplomats even threatened ‘re-education’ of Taiwanese people after reunification;

    I. whereas the PRC has been behaving aggressively across a vast area of the Indo-Pacific and exerting varying degrees of military or economic coercion, which has led to disputes with neighbours such as Japan, India, the Philippines and Australia;

    1. Strongly reiterates its commitment to the EU’s One China policy and to maintaining peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait, in the whole Indo-Pacific region and beyond;

    2. Expresses the view that UN Resolution 2758 does not establish the PRC’s sovereignty over Taiwan; underlines how Taiwan has proven to be a very reliable partner in dealing with the many challenges of our time and supports Taiwan’s participation in meetings, mechanisms and activities of relevant international organisations, particularly the WHO, the UNFCCC, Interpol and the ICAO; calls on the Commission and the Member States to promote Taiwan’s inclusion in such international forums in accordance with their statutory rules;

    3. Strongly condemns the PRC’s practice of regularly resorting to comprehensive military exercises in the Taiwan Strait; is very concerned by the increasing, unwarranted mobilisation of the PRC coast guard, which confirms that the PRC considers the waters around Taiwan as its own and increases the risks of accidents; considers this to be yet another worrying confirmation that China is deliberately jeopardising the status quo in the Taiwan Strait;

    4. Is very concerned at the adoption of guidelines for punishing ‘diehard “Taiwan independence” separatists for conducting or inciting secession’ jointly announced by the Supreme People’s Court, the Supreme People’s Procuratorate, the ministries for public security and state security and the justice ministry in June 2024, which could lead to harsh punishments for the crime of secession, up to and including the death penalty; strongly condemns the sentencing of one Taiwanese activist to nine years in prison in September this year, after his arrest while in the PRC in 2022, as well as the constant harassment of Taiwanese people working and living in the PRC;

    5. Expresses concern at the expectation that China will become more aggressive militarily in the Taiwan Strait, as well as in the Indo-Pacific region more broadly;

    6. Urges the PRC authorities to restore full respect for the Taiwan’s Strait median line and to put a stop to all other grey-zone actions against Taiwan;

    7. Remains resolutely opposed to any unilateral change in the Taiwan Strait and against the will of Taiwanese citizens; remains equally strongly opposed to the threat or use of force, and stresses that any attempt by Beijing to subjugate Taiwan would come at an extraordinarily high price for the PRC;

    8. Commends Taiwan for the remarkable democratic journey it has undertaken over the last 30 years, solidly anchored upon freedoms, the rule of law, democratic institutions and free and fair elections; highlights the recognition of same-sex marriage by Taiwan in 2019, the first such recognition in Asia; strongly encourages Taiwan to keep working towards the abolition of the death penalty;

    9. Welcomes the very responsible reactions by the Taiwanese political elite to provocations by the PRC and expresses its great respect for the whole of Taiwanese society for its extraordinary resilience and strength;

    10. Welcomes the latest annual speech by President Lai Ching-te, who also appealed to China to work with him for peace; considers this to be an encouraging sign of movement towards stronger unity within the Taiwanese political spectrum; highlights that Taiwanese sovereignty is supported across the whole political spectrum and finds its best expression in the conducting of free and fair elections and in the maturity of Taiwanese democracy;

    11. Stresses that the EU and Taiwan are like-minded partners and share common values of freedom, democracy, human rights and the rule of law, thereby making Taiwan a strategically important partner for the EU in the Indo-Pacific region;

    12. Acknowledges that the ‘One Country, Two Systems’ principle does not provide any credible prospect for the preservation of the status quo in the Taiwan Strait; stresses the need to further develop EU-Taiwan relations with the preservation of peace and democracy at their core;

    13. Highlights the importance of coupling dialogue with deterrence; stresses the need, hence, to identify a fully-fledged and multidimensional strategy that would ensure that any unilateral change in the status quo in the Taiwan Strait would come at a prohibitively high cost to the PRC;

    14. Welcomes the posting of a liaison officer at the European Economic and Trade Office in Taiwan to coordinate joint efforts to tackle disinformation and interference as a first important step towards deeper EU-Taiwan cooperation, and calls for the EU to further deepen cooperation with Taiwan in this key area;

    15. Stresses the need to strengthen the focus on the PRC’s grey-zone activities against Taiwan and to renew EU support for the resilience of Taiwanese society and democracy as a whole; encourages, with this in mind, increased scientific, cultural and political interaction at the highest level possible, as well as the deepening of parliamentary diplomacy and visits; prioritises the creation of a common civic space with Taiwan by fostering exchanges and common activities with Taiwanese civil society and media organisations; underlines the importance of the people-to-people dimension of this cooperation;

    16. Stresses the crucial role of Taiwan in the global supply chain of key high-tech sectors, notably semiconductors; welcomes the recent investment projects by Taiwanese companies in some Member States and underlines the importance for Taiwan’s security of continuing to deepen its investments in the EU; calls on the Commission and the Member States to start working on a resilient supply chain agreement with Taiwan or other bilateral agreements to deepen the economic relationship; highlights the potential for cooperation on foreign direct investment screening policy and on tackling economic coercion and retaliation;

    17. Reiterates the importance of respecting international law, in particular the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea with its provisions on the obligation to settle disputes by peaceful means, and on maintaining freedom of navigation and overflight;

    18. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, the governments and parliaments of the member states of the United Nations, and the Government and Legislative Yuan of Taiwan.

     

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Chinese cars entering the EU market via China – E-002054/2024

    Source: European Parliament

    14.10.2024

    Question for written answer  E-002054/2024
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Carlo Fidanza (ECR)

    Turkey has recently attracted significant investment from Chinese car manufacturers such as BYD and Chery, taking advantage of the customs agreement with the EU providing for duty-free movement of goods into the EU. This means that Chinese vehicles can enter the European market without any additional tariffs, which for Chery range between 17% and 21.3%, plus an existing 10%. In 2023, Turkey produced 1.4 million vehicles, a figure that is expected to reach 2 million per year.

    In view of the above:

    • 1.Is the Commission aware of this strategy of importing Chinese cars via Turkey?
    • 2.What measures does it intend to take to safeguard the competitiveness of the European car industry?
    • 3.How will it ensure that the customs union agreement with Turkey is not misused to circumvent duties on imports from China?

    Submitted: 14.10.2024

    Last updated: 22 October 2024

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Azerbaijan, violation of human rights and international law and relations with Armenia – B10-0129/2024

    Source: European Parliament

    to wind up the debate on the statement by the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy

    B10‑0129/2024

    European Parliament resolution on the situation in Azerbaijan, violation of human rights and international law and relations with Armenia

    (2024/2890(RSP))

    The European Parliament,

     having regard to it previous resolutions on Armenia and Azerbaijan,

     having regard to the Charter of the United Nations and to the principles of international law,

     having regard to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights,

     having regard to the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR),

     having regard to the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

     having regard to the European Neighbourhood Policy and to the Eastern Partnership,

     having regard to the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Armenia, of the other part[1],

     having regard to the Comprehensive and enhanced Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Armenia, of the other part[2],

     having regard to the EU Country Roadmap for Engagement with Civil Society in Armenia for the period 2021-2027,

     having regard to the Memorandum of Understanding on a Strategic Partnership in the Field of Energy signed between the EU and Azerbaijan on 18 July 2022,

     having regard to the need for a peaceful resolution to the conflict in accordance with the principles of the Helsinki Final Act, the Charter of Paris for a New Europe, and the relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions,

     having regard to the joint statement of 7 December 2023 of the Office of the Prime Minister of the Republic of Armenia and the Presidential Administration of the Republic of Azerbaijan,

     having regard to the report of 10 May 2024 of the UN Committee against Torture on Azerbaijan,

     having regard to Rule 136(2) of its Rules of Procedure,

    A. whereas a lasting and comprehensive peace agreement between Armenia and Azerbaijan is essential for the security, stability and prosperity of the South Caucasus region;

    B. whereas Azerbaijan’s aggression against Nagorno-Karabakh has resulted in significant human suffering, and Azerbaijani troops have committed ethnic cleansing and violence against the Armenian inhabitants of the region;

    C. whereas, in the context of building confidence between the two countries, an agreement had been reached for the Republic of Armenia to support the Republic of Azerbaijan’s bid to host the 29th Session of the Conference of the Parties (COP29) to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) by withdrawing its own candidacy; whereas this agreement provided for the Republic of Azerbaijan to release 32 Armenian military servicemen and the Republic of Armenia to release 2 Azerbaijani military servicemen;

    D. whereas 23 prisoners of war are still being held captive in Azerbaijan charged with spurious crimes and without adequate legal representation;

    E. whereas EU-Azerbaijan relations are based on the EU-Azerbaijan Partnership and Cooperation Agreement in force since 1999;

    F. whereas it has become clear that the gas deal signed between the Commission and Azerbaijan has given the Azerbaijani Government carte blanche to do as it pleases, knowing that the EU’s energy security is dependent on its will;

    G. whereas the 2024 United Nations Climate Change Conference or Conference of the Parties to the UNFCCC, COP29, will be held in Baku, Azerbaijan, from 11 to 22 November 2024;

    H. whereas progress has been made in recent years towards closer cooperation between the EU and Armenia, including in areas such as trade, development and political dialogue; whereas the European Union is Armenia’s second largest trading partner and its largest development cooperation donor;

    I. whereas Azerbaijan’s record in terms of respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms is still very negative and needs to be improved before the EU further deepens its political and energy partnership with the country;

    J. whereas the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights defenders, Mary Lawlor, stated on 15 August 2024 that in recent months she had witnessed an alarming wave of arrests and criminal cases against human rights defenders and journalists in Azerbaijan; whereas this statement concerns, among others, Anar Mammadli, Chair of the Election Monitoring and Democracy Studies Center, and Ulvi Hasanli, Sevinj Abbasova, Nargiz Absalamova and Elnara Gasimova, Director, Editor-in-chief and journalists respectively of Abzas Media, an outlet dedicated to human rights issues and corruption investigations;

    K. whereas Gubad Ibadoghlu, a political economist and opposition figure, was arrested by the Azerbaijani authorities in July 2023 and remained in detention until 22 April 2024, when he was transferred to house arrest; whereas his health has deteriorated significantly since his arrest, as a result of torture, inhumane detention conditions and refusal of adequate medical care, thus endangering his life;

    L. whereas Ilhamiz Guliyev, a human rights defender, was arbitrarily arrested on 4 December 2023 on dubious accusations of drug trafficking after his whistleblowing testimony about police tampering with evidence against government critics; whereas he is facing up to 12 years in prison;

    M. whereas the human rights of LGBTIQ people in Armenia and Azerbaijan are at best disregarded and at worst actively fought against by the government and state institutions; whereas, according to the 2024 Rainbow Map and Index of the International Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Intersex Association Europe, Azerbaijan scored 2 % in terms of its legal and policy practices; whereas this makes Azerbaijan the lowest-ranked of all the countries assessed;

    N. whereas, in the International Court of Justice order of 7 December 2021, which ordered Azerbaijan to prevent and punish acts of vandalism and desecration against Armenian cultural heritage, serious allegations were made regarding the involvement of the Azerbaijani authorities in the destruction of cemeteries, churches and historical monuments in Nagorno-Karabakh; whereas the building of the National Assembly of Nagorno-Karabakh was demolished by Azerbaijan on 3 March 2024;

    O. whereas the EU’s position, as expressed in relevant resolutions, is clear in rejecting ‘any attempt to facilitate or assist in any way the international recognition of the secessionist entity in occupied Cyprus, including in relation to its alleged acceptance as an observer in the Organization of Turkic States (OTS)’; whereas Azerbaijan hosted the Informal Summit of the Heads of State of the OTS on 5-6 July 2024;

    1. Underlines the importance of peace, stability and security in the South Caucasus for the region, for the EU and for the world; highlights that a lasting and comprehensive peace agreement between Armenia and Azerbaijan is essential for the security, stability and prosperity of the South Caucasus region;

    2. Calls upon the international community to support the peace process by providing diplomatic and economic assistance, by respecting and recognising the democratic will of the refugees of Nagorno-Karabakh and by encouraging all parties to fulfil their commitments under international law;

    3. Reaffirms its commitment to the principles of the Helsinki Final Act, the Charter of Paris for a New Europe and United Nations Security Council resolutions, and calls for the full implementation of these principles in the resolution of the conflict between Azerbaijan and Armenia;

    4. Deplores the forced displacement of 100 000 ethnic Armenians, resulting in ethnic cleansing of the indigenous Armenian population of Nagorno-Karabakh by Azerbaijan;

    5. Takes note of the agreement between the Republic of Azerbaijan and the Republic of Armenia to release 32 Armenian and 2 Azerbaijani military servicemen; calls for the release of the remaining 23 Armenian prisoners of war; considers that such actions can have a positive influence on normalising relations and concluding a peace treaty;

    6. Urges the Governments of Armenia and Azerbaijan to take steps to build trust and confidence between their communities, including by promoting people-to-people exchanges and educational programmes that foster reconciliation and understanding;

    7. Strongly denounces the fact that the President of the Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, has characterised Azerbaijan as a ‘trustworthy energy supplier’; reiterates its call for the Commission to immediately suspend the Memorandum of Understanding on a Strategic Partnership in the Field of Energy between the EU and Azerbaijan;

    8. Regrets statements from President Aliyev regarding the expansion of gas production to cover the increasing demand, including from European markets; considers that the acceleration of the Green Transition by the EU, while protecting the most vulnerable sections of society, can have the added benefit of diversifying its energy mix;

    9. Expresses concern about the human rights situation in Azerbaijan; urges Azerbaijan to ensure due process and fair trials and to immediately and unconditionally release all political prisoners, human rights defenders and journalists who have been unfairly detained; stresses that any partnership agreements should be contingent upon respect for the rule of law and human rights;

    10. Calls on the Azerbaijani authorities to strengthen the enforcement of labour laws and ensure that all workers, including migrant workers, are afforded their basic rights, including the right to fair wages, safe working conditions, and the right to form and join trade unions without fear of retaliation; calls on the Azerbaijani Government to improve transparency in labour practices and to implement concrete measures to prevent and address labour abuses, including child labour;

    11. Believes that the continued human rights abuses in Azerbaijan are incompatible with hosting COP29; further believes that Azerbaijan’s goal of increasing its gas production is totally incompatible with the global objective of phasing out fossil fuels set by the Parties to the UNFCCC; calls on the international community to use this opportunity to push Azerbaijan to take immediate and tangible action to address its human rights situation;

    12. Deplores the destruction of Armenian cultural, religious and historical heritage since the beginning of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, notably the razing to the ground of the building of the National Assembly of Nagorno-Karabakh;

    13. Reiterates that Azerbaijan must adhere to the principle of good neighbourly relations and respect international law, which includes the need to respect the sovereignty and territorial integrity of all states;

    14. Rejects any attempt to facilitate or assist in any way the international recognition of the secessionist entity in occupied Cyprus, including in relation to its alleged acceptance as an observer in the Organization of Turkic States; encourages Azerbaijan to duly uphold respect for the principles of the sovereignty and territorial integrity of all states; deplores that Azerbaijan has ratified the amended Statute of the Organization of Turkic States, which would put into effect the decision to grant the secessionist entity observer status;

    15. Takes note of the UN Committee against Torture’s report of 10 May 2024 on Azerbaijan; calls for further action by the Azerbaijani authorities on respecting human rights, especially in the areas of: harassment of human rights defenders and journalists; hate crimes, hate speech and discrimination; the rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender persons; and gender-based and domestic violence;

    16. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, the governments and parliaments of the Member States, and the Governments of Armenia and Azerbaijan.

     

     

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Attacks on Bangladesh’s Hindu minority – E-001670/2024(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The EU is following the political and security situation in Bangladesh closely and it is well aware that shifts in power dynamics in a country or a region could lead to more space for extremism. The EU is also aware that Bangladesh in the past has been the victim of terrorist attacks.

    On 6 August 2024, the EU Heads of mission in Dhaka expressed concern over reports of multiple attacks against places of worship[1] and members of religious, ethnic and other minorities.

    The EU understands that the situation has since then improved, but the EU will continue to follow closely and raise the issue during the upcoming Sub-group on Human Rights and Good Governance of the Joint Commission.

    The Joint Commission and its subgroups are established according to the cooperation agreement[2] that is the framework for the EU-Bangladesh relations and of which the respect for human rights is an essential element.

    The EU is engaging with the interim government and is ready to support a transition, which should be peaceful and inclusive, respectful of democratic principles, human rights and the rule of law, and would lead to democratic elections.

    • [1] https://x.com/EUinBangladesh/status/1820768987598278684/photo/1
    • [2] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A22001A0427%2801%29
    Last updated: 22 October 2024

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Closure of the Somport and Bielsa border crossings – P-001667/2024(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission is aware of the closure of road RN134 in France, leading to Spain through the Somport tunnel. The Commission is concerned about the severe consequences that this disruption will have for the economy of the regions on both sides of the border, not only for road hauliers, but also local companies and their employees.

    It is the Commission’s understanding that traffic along road RN134 became de facto impossible following the damage caused by extreme rainfall in the area.

    The Commission has contacted the French authorities, who have reported that the Inter-Department Directorate for The Atlantic Roads (DIRA) has now carried out a technical assessment on the ground, based on which it presented a proposal to repair the damage.

    According to this proposal, the DIRA estimates that the works would be concluded during 2025, although the traffic could already be restored in January 2025.

    The Commission does not oversee the road works carried out by Member States. Nevertheless, the Commission trusts that the responsible bodies will work diligently to reestablish the traffic as soon as possible.

    The Commission also understands, based on the explanations received, that the French authorities opened a dialogue with their Spanish counterparts, including two meetings on 10 and 24 September 2024.

    The Commission is committed to monitor and ensure the safe flow of passengers and goods along this section of the comprehensive trans-European transport network.

    Last updated: 22 October 2024

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Rule of law in Hungary – E-001595/2024(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    In May 2023, Hungary adopted legislation which significantly strengthened judicial independence. This reform fully implemented the relevant recommendations set out in the 2022 Rule of Law Report, as confirmed in the 2023 Report, a conclusion maintained by the 2024 Report.

    The Commission’s analysis of compliance with the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union horizontal enabling condition was carried out under the rules of the Common Provisions Regulations (CPR).

    Since Hungary submitted compelling evidence that the relevant issues concerning judicial independence were addressed, the Commission adopted its decision within the deadline foreseen in the CPR.

    The issues covered in this process are different from those covered by the recommendations set out in the 2024 Rule of Law Report.

    The Commission is closely and continuously monitoring the application of the measures put in place by Hungary. If, at any point in time, the Commission considers that this horizontal enabling condition is no longer fulfilled, expenditure for programmes and specific objectives impacted by the non-fulfilment will again no longer be reimbursed.

    The President of the Commission’s political guidelines clearly state that the respect of the rule of law is — and will be — a must for EU funds.

    The mandate for the Commissioners-designate include clear tasks in this respect, such as ensuring that EU funding also be dedicated to national measures, for example on fighting corruption, and to protecting the EU financial interests and building a closer link between the recommendations in the Rule of Law Report and financial support under the EU budget.

    The future long-term budget proposal will include strong safeguards on the rule of law — including the general regime of conditionality, applying to all EU funds.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – EU diplomats smuggling cigars and alcohol for personal profit – E-001664/2024(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The specific case mentioned in the Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) 2023 Annual Report[1] refers to staff who worked in an EU delegation.

    The European External Action Service (EEAS) and the Commission monitor their staff compliance as regards statutory obligations and those deriving from the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations[2].

    Any infringement of those obligations brought to the attention of these institutions are addressed and referred to the Investigative and Disciplinary Office of the Commission (IDOC), or to OLAF accordingly.

    The EEAS and the Commission services have followed up on the recommendations given by OLAF but cannot comment on individual cases.

    Staff are provided with training on rights, obligations, and privileges before departing for a posting to an EU delegation, as well as appropriate inductions and refresher trainings on the ethics rules in place and on the reporting mechanisms for allegations of misconduct.

    Last updated: 22 October 2024

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI USA: A Dazzling Supernova

    Source: NASA

    This image, released on Feb. 24, 2017, shows Supernova 1987a (center) surrounded by dramatic red clouds of gas and dust within the Large Magellanic Cloud. This supernova, first discovered on Feb. 23, 1987, blazed with the power of 100 million Suns. Since that first sighting, SN 1987A has continued to fascinate astronomers with its spectacular light show. Located in the nearby Large Magellanic Cloud, it was the nearest supernova explosion observed in hundreds of years and the best opportunity yet for astronomers to study the phases before, during, and after the death of a star.
    Image credit: NASA, ESA, R. Kirshner (Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics and Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation), and M. Mutchler and R. Avila (STScI)

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Further delays to the reopening of the Fréjus Rail Tunnel – E-001567/2024(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    1. As pointed out in reply to Written Question E-001506/2024, the Commission is aware that the situation created by the landslide near La Praz and the ensuing closure of the Fréjus railway line since August 2023 is serious and damaging for operators and the exports of Italian goods. The renovation works on the line will take some time due to their challenging nature .

    2. Coordination of trans-Alpine transport is already addressed by existing coordination structures, in particular the Zurich Process[1] and the EU strategy for the Alpine region (EUSALP)[2]. These structures should be used to the largest extent possible in situations such as the current interruption of the Fréjus rail line following the landslide in August 2023 to ensure that traffic can continue on the most efficient routes and that excessive detours are avoided.

    3. At this stage, the Commission does not have evidence that not all is done to reopen the line as soon as possible. See please also the reply to question 2.

    • [1] https://acrossthealps.org/
    • [2] https://alpine-region.eu/
    Last updated: 22 October 2024

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: « Switzerland’s Security 2024 »: The Federal Intelligence Service publishes its latest situation report

    Source: Switzerland – Department of Foreign Affairs in English

    Switzerland’s security environment continues to deteriorate from year to year. Of the strategic patterns currently emerging, the closer military cooperation between a group of Eurasian autocracies is one of the most concerning. The Federal Intelligence Service’s (FIS) abilities to anticipate, identify and assess in time threats and developments that are of strategic importance to Switzerland are crucial for taking preventive measures. The latest FIS situation report presents the main developments in intelligence over the past year.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Azerbaijan, violation of human rights and international law and relations with Armenia – B10-0142/2024

    Source: European Parliament

    Şerban‑Dimitrie Sturdza, Sebastian Tynkkynen, Aurelijus Veryga, Claudiu‑Richard Târziu, Assita Kanko
    on behalf of the ECR Group

    B10‑0142/2024

    European Parliament resolution on the situation in Azerbaijan, violation of human rights and international law and relations with Armenia

    (2024/2890(RSP))

    The European Parliament,

     having regard to the European Convention on Human Rights of 1950, ratified by Azerbaijan in 2002,

     having regard to the UN Charter,

     having regard to Geneva Conventions of 1949,

     having regard to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights of 1966,

     having regard to the joint EU-US-Armenia high-level meeting of 5 April 2024 in support of Armenia’s resilience,

     having regard to its previous resolutions on Armenia and Azerbaijan,

     having regard to the Comprehensive and Enhanced Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Armenia, of the other part[1] (CEPA), which fully entered into force on 1 March 2021,

     having regard to Decision 99/614/EC, ECSC, Euratom of the Council and of the Commission of 31 May 1999 on the conclusion of the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Azerbaijan, of the other part[2] (EU-Azerbaijan Partnership and Cooperation Agreement), which has been in force since 1999,

     having regard to the launch of the EU Mission in Armenia on 20 February 2023,

     having regard to the 1954 Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict, to which Armenia and Azerbaijan are parties,

     having regard to the statement of 24 August 2024 by the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy on behalf of the EU on recent post-election developments,

     having regard to the statement of preliminary findings and conclusions of the International Election Observation Mission of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) on the early parliamentary elections of 1 September 2024 in Azerbaijan,

     having regard to the statement by the European External Action Service (EEAS) spokesperson of 3 September 2024 on Azerbaijan’s early parliamentary elections,

     having regard to the statement by the EEAS spokesperson of 29 May 2024 on the human rights situation in Azerbaijan,

     having regard to the Memorandum of Understanding on a strategic partnership in the field of energy signed between the EU and Azerbaijan on 18 July 2022,

     having regard to the 2023 Eastern Partnership Index,

     having regard to Rule 136(2) of its Rules of Procedure,

    A. whereas Azerbaijan has serious shortcomings in the area of fundamental freedoms, including freedom of expression and assembly and media freedom, and engages in repression of political activists, journalists and civil society, all of which distances Azerbaijan from democratic norms and international human rights standards; whereas corruption and a lack of judicial independence further undermine the country’s governance, while government authorities continue to suppress dissent and persecute critics; whereas despite international agreements and calls for reform, including from the European Parliament, Azerbaijan has made limited to no progress on improving its human rights record;

    B. whereas journalists, human rights defenders and activists have been imprisoned in the country, with approximately 30 prominent figures behind bars on politically motivated charges, and a surge in arbitrary arrests and detentions has been reported, their number having tripled as Azerbaijan silences opposition ahead of the upcoming 2024 UN Climate Change Conference (COP29) in Baku, and there are allegations of torture and beatings; whereas notable civil society organisations have called for the EU and international leaders to pressure Azerbaijan to improve its human rights record during COP29, urging the release of political prisoners and an end to arbitrary prosecutions;

    C. whereas according to the US Department of State’s Azerbaijan 2023 Human Rights Report, there were credible allegations that the Azerbaijani Government ‘used violence or threats of violence against individuals in other countries as politically motivated reprisal’; whereas according to this report, the Azerbaijani Government ‘limited freedom of expression and media independence’, and ‘there were reports that dissidents and journalists who lived outside the country suffered digital harassment and intimidation of family members who remained in Azerbaijan’;

    D. whereas early parliamentary elections were held in Azerbaijan on 1 September 2024, and, according to the OSCE’s International Election Observation Mission, took place ‘in a restrictive political and legal environment that does not enable genuine pluralism and resulted in a contest devoid of competition’;

    E. whereas September 2024 was the fourth anniversary of the Second Nagorno-Karabakh War, and marked one year since Azerbaijan forcibly regained control over Nagorno-Karabakh, which is part of its internationally recognised territory; whereas all the state institutions of the so-called Nagorno-Karabakh Republic were dissolved as of 1 January 2024; whereas these events, preceded by Azerbaijan’s blockade of the Lachin corridor, resulted in the mass exodus of almost the entire population of Armenians from Nagorno-Karabakh; whereas, as a result, Nagorno-Karabakh has been entirely ethnically cleansed of its Armenian population, who had been living there for centuries;

    F. whereas over more than three decades, the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict has resulted in tens of thousands of casualties, immense destruction, including of cultural, religious and historical heritage, and the displacement of hundreds of thousands of people on both sides; whereas there are six interstate cases before the European Court of Human Rights between Armenia and Azerbaijan in relation to the Nagorno-Karabakh region, with both countries standing accused of having violated human rights conventions; whereas Azerbaijan has repeatedly been accused of ethnic cleansing, particularly in the Nagorno-Karabakh region, where it is said to have displaced over 100 000 ethnic Armenians;

    G. whereas three decades of diplomacy and peacebuilding efforts by the OSCE, the EU and other international actors have failed to find a peaceful solution to the conflict and, therefore, to deter Azerbaijan from its use of military force;

    H. whereas according to the US Department of State’s Azerbaijan 2023 Human Rights Report, the Azerbaijani Government ‘did not take credible steps to punish the majority of officials who were reported to have committed human rights abuses’; whereas the report also states that there was ‘no reported progress on government investigations of alleged abuses committed by Azerbaijani armed forces or individuals during the 2020 and 2022 hostilities’;

    I. whereas it is necessary to ensure connectivity between Europe and Asia while avoiding crossing Russian territory; whereas the South Caucasus is in a strategic position for promoting Europe-Asia connectivity, which is particularly important for the EU’s energy capacities and for trade with Central Asia;

    J. whereas Armenia has already managed to weaken its ties with Russia in relation to security, as it has frozen its participation in the Russia-led Collective Security Treaty Organization, although it remains a member of the Eurasian Economic Union;

    K. whereas the eighth meeting of the border commissions of Armenia and Azerbaijan, held on 19 April 2024, concluded with a preliminary agreement on the delimitation of four border sections;

    L. whereas the peace talks between Armenia and Azerbaijan appear to be at a standstill and it is unlikely that an agreement will be concluded and signed before COP29; whereas the peace deal should contribute to the long-term stability of bilateral relations and of the wider region as a whole; whereas this goal can only be achieved if the authorities of Armenia and Azerbaijan can guarantee peaceful coexistence and respect for minority rights;

    M. whereas Azerbaijan is a major oil and natural gas producer, particularly through the Azeri-Chirag-Gunashli oil field and the Shah Deniz gas field in the Caspian Sea, and the country primarily uses the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline to export hydrocarbons to Europe, bypassing Russia and offering the EU an alternative energy source, which is valuable in this geopolitical climate; whereas Azerbaijan’s economy is heavily reliant on oil and gas revenues, which make up more than 90 % of the country’s export revenues and account for a noteworthy portion of the government’s budget;

    N. whereas gas contracts between Gazprom and SOCAR for the delivery of one billion cubic metres of gas from Russia to Azerbaijan between November 2022 and March 2023 have raised significant concerns about the re-export of Russian gas to the European market, particularly in light of the memorandum of understanding signed by Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev and Commission President Ursula von der Leyen; whereas the EU aims to reduce European dependence on Russian gas, but this agreement could be seen as undermining that goal, as Russian gas would still be flowing into Azerbaijan, thus potentially freeing up Azerbaijani gas for increased re-export to the EU; whereas there are significant challenges facing European efforts to replace Russian gas shipped via Ukraine with Azerbaijani gas by the end of 2024, and although Ukraine, the EU and Azerbaijan support the injection of Azerbaijani gas into Russian pipelines, Azerbaijan might lack sufficient gas supplies to make up the shortfall; whereas, in this regard, the Trans-Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline could provide an alternative route to ensure adequate supply, but new infrastructure is required to enhance gas transmission capacity in the interconnections with the EU, particularly through Bulgaria and Romania on one side and the Trans-Adriatic Pipeline on the other, in order to ensure a more efficient and secure flow of gas into the European market;

    1. Expresses its concern about the human rights situation in Azerbaijan; urges Azerbaijan to fulfil its obligations under its own constitution and under international agreements to protect fundamental freedoms and respect the human dignity of its citizens, and to cease the use of criminal prosecution as a tool to suppress government critics and members of civil society;

    2. Calls on Azerbaijan to drop all charges against Gubad Ibadoghlu, Ilhamiz Guliyev and all other people imprisoned for exercising their fundamental rights, to release them and to ensure free and unhindered space for independent journalism and freedom of expression; calls on Azerbaijan to allow Dr Ibadoghlu to travel abroad, unhindered and to the country of his choice, to reunite with his family and to receive the medical care he urgently needs;

    3. Calls on the Commission, UN mechanisms and other international actors to step up their efforts to promote human rights and democratic governance in Azerbaijan ahead of COP29;

    4. Underlines that COP29 could be an opportunity for Azerbaijan to reaffirm its genuine commitment to its obligations under international law, instead of using it to gloss over its human rights record while continuing repressive practices;

    5. Calls on the Commission to work closely with the UN to urgently establish a comprehensive plan for investigating and clarifying the fate of the Armenian military personnel, including women, and the eight unarmed Armenian prisoners of war who were killed or reported missing in connection with the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, and to conduct impartial inquiries on the ground, facilitate information exchanges, secure unhindered access to detention facilities for international observers through the Council of Europe’s Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, such observers having previously been denied access, and launch a centralised database for tracing and resolving missing persons cases, while also providing the necessary support and resources to the families affected;

    6. Demands that Azerbaijan release the 23 Armenian hostages who are still being held in Baku, including the former leaders of Nagorno-Karabakh;

    7. Reiterates its condemnation of the Azerbaijani military incursions into the internationally recognised territory of Armenia in recent years; expresses its sympathy with the Nagorno-Karabakh Armenians who had to flee their ancestral lands, and calls on the authorities in Baku to guarantee the safe return of Nagorno-Karabakh Armenians and to uphold their rights to cultivate their culture and traditions; welcomes all efforts by the Government of Armenia to provide shelter and aid to the displaced Armenians;

    8. Expresses deep concern for the preservation of cultural, religious and historical heritage in Nagorno-Karabakh; urges Azerbaijan to refrain from further destroying, neglecting or altering the origins of cultural, religious or historical heritage in the region; demands the protection of the Armenian cultural, historical and religious heritage in Nagorno-Karabakh in line with UNESCO standards and Azerbaijan’s international commitments; insists that Azerbaijan allow a UNESCO mission to Nagorno-Karabakh and grant it the necessary access to heritage;

    9. Strongly condemns Russia’s increasing hybrid attempts to destabilise the political situation inside Armenia and in the region; is concerned that the EU Mission in Armenia is regularly targeted by Russian disinformation attempts and campaigns;

    10. Reiterates the EU’s commitment to peace, stability and prosperity in the Caucasus region; underlines its unequivocal support for the sovereignty, territorial integrity and political independence of Armenia and Azerbaijan; expresses support for the normalisation of relations between Armenia and Azerbaijan, with the goal of achieving lasting peace; encourages both countries to continue to make progress on finalising an agreement and signing a peace deal as soon as possible;

    11. Believes that genuine dialogue between Azerbaijan and Armenia is the only sustainable way forward and calls for the EU and its Member States to support such efforts, which must include the mutual recognition of territorial integrity, guarantees for the rights and security of Nagorno-Karabakh’s Armenian population and the release of the remaining prisoners, including the former leaders of Nagorno-Karabakh, and an end to the sham trials against them;

    12. Stresses that EU involvement in the region should be practical and result-oriented, unlike the role played by Russia, which for decades has fuelled the conflict and used it for its own political gain; welcomes the fact that Armenia has frozen its participation in the Collective Security Treaty Organization; underlines that Azerbaijan’s connectivity issues with its exclave of Nakhchivan should be resolved with full respect for the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Armenia;

    13. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, the President, Government and Parliament of the Republic of Azerbaijan, the President, Government and Parliament of the Republic of Armenia, the Director-General of UNESCO, the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe, the UN and the Council of Europe.

     

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: At a Glance – The Commission as ‘caretaker administration’ – 22-10-2024

    Source: European Parliament

    The hearings of the Commissioners-designate before the European Parliament’s committees are scheduled to take place between 4 and 12 November 2024. Depending on the results of the hearings, the plenary vote on the entire Commission is likely to take place during the November plenary session (25-28 November) or the December session in Strasbourg. Before such a vote, President-elect Ursula von der Leyen will present the full college and its programme. Considering that the incumbent Commission was appointed until 31 October 2024, it is already certain that the new Commission will not be able to enter into office by the time the mandate of the current one ends. The outgoing Commission will thus remain in office until the formal appointment of its replacement, although questions arise as to its powers in that period.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Briefing – Revision of the Driving Licence Directive – 22-10-2024

    Source: European Parliament

    On 1 March 2023, the European Commission published its legislative proposal on driving licences – a matter of EU competence – to facilitate the free movement of persons and goods throughout the EU by modernising the driving licence system. This involves future-proofing the driving licence rules, improving road safety and simplifying the rules for those wanting to get a driving licence. The proposal provides for accompanied driving for young learners, zero tolerance for drink-driving, better preparation for micro-mobility, and the introduction of digital driving licences. In the European Parliament, the legislative file was assigned to the Committee on Transport and Tourism (TRAN) (rapporteur: Jutta Paulus, Greens/EFA, Germany). The TRAN committee report was adopted on 7 December 2023. On 28 February 2024, Parliament voted in plenary on its first reading position on the file. On 7 October, the TRAN committee voted to start trilogue negotiations. Fourth edition, the first was drafted by Karin Smit Jacobs. The ‘EU Legislation in Progress’ briefings are updated at key stages throughout the legislative procedure.

    MIL OSI Europe News