NewzIntel.com

    • Checkout Page
    • Contact Us
    • Default Redirect Page
    • Frontpage
    • Home-2
    • Home-3
    • Lost Password
    • Member Login
    • Member LogOut
    • Member TOS Page
    • My Account
    • NewzIntel Alert Control-Panel
    • NewzIntel Latest Reports
    • Post Views Counter
    • Privacy Policy
    • Public Individual Page
    • Register
    • Subscription Plan
    • Thank You Page

Category: Latin America

  • MIL-OSI Security: BVI MAN AND FOUR HAITIAN NATIONALS CHARGED IN ILLEGAL ALIEN SMUGGLING CASE

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    St. Thomas, VI – United States Attorney Delia L. Smith announced today that Jose Miguel Hodge, 31, of the British Virgin Islands, was charged with alien smuggling. Also charged were Junia Orelus, 32, Clawens Destin, 18, and Jean Louis Martellus, 27, all of Haiti, and Eudys Santana Santos, 33, of the Dominican Republic, with unlawful entry into the United States.

    According to court records, on February 7, 2025, Customs and Border Protection Air Marine Operations agents observed Hodge operating a vessel traveling from BVI waters and later arriving at Annaberg Bay, St. John, without navigational lights. The agents intercepted and boarded Hodge’s vessel and found Orelus, Destin and Metellus, all illegal aliens, onboard. Santana Santos, also an illegal alien, was found at Annaberg Bay waiting to provide transportation to at least one of the illegal migrant onboard Hodge’s vessel.

    This case is being investigated by Customs and Border Protection Air Marine Operations and Homeland Security Investigations and is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Everard E. Potter.

    United States Attorney Smith reminds the public that a criminal complaint is merely an allegation, and all defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.

    MIL Security OSI –

    March 1, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Video: Secretary-General/Bangladesh, Ramadan, Türkiye & other topics – Daily Press Briefing (27 February)

    Source: United Nations (Video News)

    Noon Briefing by Stéphane Dujarric, Spokesperson for the Secretary-General.

    Highlights:
    Secretary-General/Bangladesh
    Secretary-General/Ramadan Message
    Türkiye
    Haiti
    Ukraine
    Sudan
    Democratic Republic of the Congo/Jean-Pierre Lacroix
    Democratic Republic of the Congo
    Occupied Palestinian Territory
    Lebanon
    Staff Security

    SECRETARY-GENERAL/BANGLADESH
    Every year, the Secretary-General does a Ramadan solidarity visit, where he likes to visit and fast with a Muslim community, which is facing distress. He began this tradition when he was High Commissioner for Refugees. In his own words, the Secretary-General said that Ramadan embodies the values of compassion, empathy and generosity. It is an opportunity to reconnect with family, with community and a chance to remember those less fortunate. These missions are to remind the world of the true face of Islam.
    This year, the Secretary-General will be going to Bangladesh from the 13-16 March. He will travel to Cox’s Bazaar to join an Iftar and meet with Rohingya refugees who have been forcibly displaced from their homes in Myanmar, and also, of course, with the host Bangladeshi communities who have been generously in hosting the refugees from Myanmar.
    During his visit, he will also be in the capital of Bangladesh, Dhaka, where he will meet with the Chief Adviser for the interim government, Professor Muhammed Yunus, as well as with young women and men and representatives from civil society.

    SECRETARY-GENERAL/RAMADAN MESSAGE
    In his annual message at the start of Ramadan, the Secretary-General expressed a special message of support to all those who will spend this sacred time in displacement and violence. From Gaza and the wider region, to Sudan, the Sahel and beyond.
    The Secretary-General stands with all those who are suffering and joins those observing Ramadan to call for peace and mutual respect.

    TÜRKIYE
    On the reports coming out of Türkiye regarding Abdullah Öcalan, the imprisoned leader of the Kurdistan Workers Party, the PKK, and his message calling for fighters to lay down their arms and the PKK to dissolve itself, the spokesperson said that the Secretary-General welcomes this important development. This represents a glimmer of hope, which would lead to the resolution of a long-standing conflict.

    HAITI
    The World Food Programme (WFP) today said that, as part of their emergency response in Haiti, they continue to provide critical food assistance, cash-based transfers, and hot meals across the Artibonite, Nord, and Ouest departments. This includes $1.2 million in cash assistance, as well as nearly 3,000 meals distributed in border regions to Haitians deported back to their country.
    Last week, the WFP organized the first of two humanitarian cargo flights from Panama City to Port-au-Prince. This was the first humanitarian cargo flight to land at the Port-au-Prince airport since its closure lastNovember.
    The flight carried medicines, vaccines, and medical supplies for eight humanitarian organizations. A second flight is scheduled in about one month.

    Full highlights: https://www.un.org/sg/en/content/noon-briefing-highlight?date%5Bvalue%5D%5Bdate%5D=27%20February%202025

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nX1Wlh5xwHk

    MIL OSI Video –

    March 1, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: ICE arrests MS-13 gang member in Iowa

    Source: US Immigration and Customs Enforcement

    February 28, 2025Minneapolis, MN, United StatesEnforcement and Removal

    MINNEAPOLIS – U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the U.S. Marshals Service arrested Luis Enrique Baires, 28, a criminal alien from El Salvador wanted in his home country for two counts of aggravated homicide, two counts of proposition and conspiracy for the crime of aggravated homicide, and one count of illicit associations with the MS-13, Enfermos Criminales Salvatruchos clique Feb. 21 during a routine traffic stop in Des Moines, Iowa.

    “Rural Iowa is not immune from central American criminals like Baires, and we will continue to face the challenge of tracking down and arresting the worst of the worst,” said ICE Enforcement and Removal Operations St. Paul Field Office Director Matthew Putra. “Thanks to U.S. Marshals Service for assisting us in this arrest to keep communities safe.”

    Baires remains in ICE custody without bond pending the outcome of his removal proceedings.

    For more news and information on ICE’s efforts to enforce our nation’s immigration laws in the St. Paul Area of Operations which includes Minneapolis, Iowa, North and South Dakota and Nebraska follow us on X at @EROSaintPaul.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    March 1, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: Banco Itaú Chile Announces Fourth Quarter 2024 Management Discussion & Analysis Report

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    SANTIAGO, Chile, Feb. 28, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — BANCO ITAÚ CHILE (SSE: ITAUCL) announced today its Management Discussion & Analysis Report (“MD&A Report”) for the fourth quarter ended December 31, 2024. For the full MD&A Report, please refer to the following link:

    https://ir.itau.cl/MDAQ42024

    On Monday, March 3, 2025, at 11:00 A.M. Santiago time (9:00 A.M. ET), the Company’s management team will host a conference call to discuss the financial results. The call will be hosted by André Gailey, CEO; Claudia Labbé Montevecchi, Head of IR and Chief Sustainability Officer; and Matías Valenzuela Barrenechea, Head of FP&A, Capital and IR.

    Conference Call Details:

    Online registration: https://registrations.events/direct/Q4I6136278

    All participants must pre-register using this link to join the conference call. Upon registering, each participant will be provided with details to connect to the call and a registrant ID.

    Webcast:

    The webcast will be available through the following link:

    https://events.q4inc.com/attendee/846439085

    Participants in the live webcast should register on the website approximately 10 minutes prior to the start of the webcast. Following the event, the event will be available in the same link.

    Telephone and Virtual Q&A session:

    The Q&A session will be available for participants connected through the conference call and through the webcast, where attendees will be allowed to type in their questions – we will read and answer selected questions verbally.

    Investor Relations – Itaú Chile

    IR@itau.cl / ir.itau.cl

    The MIL Network –

    February 28, 2025
  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: UK’s global science and tech ambitions refreshed under new banner

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Press release

    UK’s global science and tech ambitions refreshed under new banner

    Worldwide team championing UK science and tech partnership as a force for good, to be re-launched as the Science and Technology Network.

    Science and Technology Network launched.

    • Worldwide team championing UK science and tech partnership as a force for good, to be re-launched as the Science and Technology Network
    • Network already has over 130 staff in 65 locations globally, building partnerships around the science and tech innovations set to make us collectively healthier, wealthier, more resilient and secure in support of the Plan for Change
    • Science Minister welcomes Network’s re-launch alongside leaders from across research, academia and business

    The UK’s global team for forging the international collaboration and championing the power of British science and tech expertise to solve some of the world’s most pressing problems– from clean energy to health – will be refreshed under a new banner, as officially unveiled by the Science Minister in Whitehall on Thursday 27 February.

    The Science and Technology Network (STN) will be the new name for the former Science and Innovation Network: a 130-strong team based in 65 locations worldwide, with a mission to forge deeper international partnerships on science and technology, and seek new opportunities for British sci-tech pioneers in support of the Plan for Change.

    The network’s new name reflects the circumstances we now live in, where breakthrough technologies like AI, quantum, and engineering biology hold enormous potential for tackling environmental and social challenges and unlocking economic growth. In a fast-changing global landscape, now more than ever we need to pool the bright talent and big ideas that are needed to harness these emerging technologies for good, at home and abroad.

    Recent announcements like the AI Opportunities Action Plan clearly show the government’s domestic ambitions for harnessing the power of technology to improve people’s lives, but these aspirations are not solely inward-facing. The UK wants to work with international partners to share expertise, unlock investment, and deliver transformational benefits for communities in the UK and around the world.

    UK Science Minister Lord Vallance said:

    Britain is stronger when it works together with others and nowhere is that more true than when it comes to science and technology. Genius is not bound by geography, and by building international ties, we stand the best chance of developing new ideas and breakthroughs to solve the toughest challenges that all societies face.

    The UK has a long track record as a global leader, when it comes to research and innovation. We are uniquely placed to convene international work that brings scientific expertise to bear on improving health, adoption clean sources of energy, and more. It is only right that we put the critically important role of technology, at the centre of those efforts.

    Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office Minister Catherine West said:

    The UK harnesses cutting-edge technology to tackle the world’s toughest challenges, from the climate crisis to the threat of pandemics.

    With staff based in 65 locations, the newly-named Science and Technology Network will help us forge global partnerships and galvanise scientific expertise, to enhance security and growth around the world.

    Lord Vallance will speak to an audience of researchers, academics and business leaders at the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office, this evening – which also marks the Network’s 25th anniversary. He will be joined by FCDO’s Chief Scientific Adviser, Professor Charlotte Watts, as they welcome the Network’s new name and to emphasise the importance of its ongoing work.

    Some examples of STN wins include UK-Danish work in the Arctic that could be crucial to our understanding of climate change, the establishment of the UK-Japan Semiconductors Partnership, and a UK-USA partnership that is bringing the massive potential of quantum technologies to bear in health and life sciences.

    The Network has also supported the delivery of potentially lifesaving research as overseas aid, ranging from work tackling the Zika virus outbreak in Brazil, to a project trying to better forecast devastating typhoons in South-East Asia.

    The Science and Technology Network has 3 objectives:

    • promoting UK science, technology and innovation excellence and leadership globally
    • actively building and facilitating science, technology and innovation collaborations
    • providing insight on science and technology trends and opportunities

    Through its work, the Network aims to build international partnerships that can help seize the opportunities and mitigate the risks arising from critical and emerging technologies, as well as tackling the climate crisis and improving health.

    Sir Mark Walport, Vice President and Foreign Secretary of the Royal Society, said:

    Maintaining the position of the UK as a global leader in science, engineering and technology is essential for the UK’s long-term prosperity and international standing. Furthermore, diplomacy in support of science is at the heart of the development of international policies and collaboration to address issues such as climate change, loss of biodiversity, pandemics and food security. The Science and Technology Network’s team of diplomats and civil servants will play an extremely important role in support of these aims.

    Professor Christopher Smith, UK Research and Innovation’s International Champion, said:

    The rebrand of The Science and Technology Network is a reflection of its evolving role in fostering global research and innovation partnerships.

    The network has been instrumental in strengthening the UK’s position as a world leader in science, and we look forward to continuing our collaboration to drive international research excellence, support innovation-led growth, and tackle global challenges together across all disciplines and sectors.

    Maddalaine Ansell, Director Education, British Council, said:

    International collaboration in science and technology is critical if we are to overcome global challenges. The UK, which is ranked 3rd in the world for producing highly cited research outputs, must be part of the global effort. Playing our full part will also reinforce and further expand the UK’s reputation both for excellence in science and as a force for good in the global community. The Science & Technology Network is an important enabler of UK activity on the global stage, supporting the UK’s scientific community to develop stable and lasting partnerships with peers around the world.

    Jamie Arrowsmith, Director of Universities UK International, said:

    UK universities have a long-standing relationship with the Network, and our members get immense value from their in-country expertise, insight, and intelligence. This rebranding reflects the dynamic and evolving landscape of science and technology, and we believe it will further enhance the network’s ability to drive international collaboration and deliver on global and technological challenges. 

    Universities UK International is committed to fostering a globally collaborative higher education environment where research, science, and technology can thrive. We look forward to continuing to work with the Science and Technology Network to advance these shared goals.

    Beth Thompson, Executive Director Policy and Partnerships, Wellcome, said:

    Science and technology are pillars of the UK’s diplomatic work. We welcome the government’s recognition of the Science and Technology Network’s (STN) newly invigorated and invaluable role, fostering global partnerships that tackle shared challenges, and unlock new opportunities for collaboration.

    The UK has a world-class research sector, but progress is not achieved in isolation – it thrives on international cooperation. We have seen first-hand the value of the Network in helping us build relationships across the globe that are critical to advancing research. The refreshed STN will be instrumental in strengthening these international partnerships, ensuring science and technology continue to deliver a healthier, more prosperous future for the UK and the world.

    DSIT media enquiries

    Email press@dsit.gov.uk

    Monday to Friday, 8:30am to 6pm 020 7215 300

    Share this page

    The following links open in a new tab

    • Share on Facebook (opens in new tab)
    • Share on Twitter (opens in new tab)

    Updates to this page

    Published 28 February 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom –

    February 28, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: Production report for January 2025

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Oslo, 28 February 2025

             January 2025 December 2024
    Operated Boepd (1) Bopd (1) Boepd (1) Bopd (2)
    Colombia 623 446 594 418
    Argentina 1,342 218 1,908 244
    Total operated 1,965 664 2,502 662
    Total equity 991 384 1,217 377

    (1)   Barrels of oil equivalents per day (includes liquid and gas)
    (2)   Barrels of oil per day (represents only liquids)
    [boepd]: barrels of oil equivalents per day (includes liquid and gas)
    [Operated]: 100% field production operated by Interoil
    [Equity]        : Interoil’s share production net of royalties.

    Production Summary

    Interoil’s daily average total operated production for January was 1,965 boepd, reflecting a decrease of 537 boepd when compared with December.

    Decline is primarily attributed to our operations in Argentina (-566 boepd) while operations in Colombia had a modest increase (+ 29 boepd).

    Country-Specific Highlights

    Argentina

    Gas production was primarily affected by the breakdown of two compressor engines, which required the custom fabrication of replacement parts. These parts arrived to the field in February. Consequently, gas production experienced a sustained decrease from January until the repair of the damaged compressors in February.

    Colombia

    In January, the Vikingo-1 well achieved an average daily production of 196 boepd, effectively offsetting the natural depletion at Puli C and contributing an additional 30 boepd. Currently, the workover rig has completed the intervention of the MN-11 well, the first planned for this campaign in Puli C Fields. This intervention involved the replacement of downhole equipment, including tubing, pump, and rods.

    This campaign, which includes at least four additional planned interventions in the Puli C Fields, aims to recover as much as 50 bopd and 600 kscfpd of gas.

    Additional information

    Further details about production performance are shown in the attached document. The graphs and tables illustrate both operated and equity production of oil and gas by country. “Operated production” refers to the total output from fields operated by Interoil, while “Equity production” refers to Interoil’s share of production, net of royalties.

    Note: This report complies with disclosure requirements outlined in sections 5-12 of the Norwegian Securities Trading Act.

    ***************************
    Please direct any further questions to ir@interoil.no
    Interoil Exploration and Production ASA is a Norwegian based exploration and production company – listed on the Oslo Stock Exchange with focus on Latin America. The Company is operator and license holder of several production and exploration assets in Colombia and Argentina with headquarter in Oslo.

    Attachment

    • Interoil January 2025 Detailed Production Report

    The MIL Network –

    February 28, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: February 27th, 2025 Heinrich, Vasquez Urge New Mexico Attorney General to Investigate Health Care Centers in Denying Medical Care to New Mexicans

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for New Mexico Martin Heinrich

    WASHINGTON — U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.) and U.S. Representative Gabe Vasquez (D-N.M.) sent a letter urging New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez to open an investigation into Ben Archer Health Centers refusing to provide medical care to individuals without “proof of citizenship.”

    Heinrich’s office was alerted by constituents to Ben Archer Health Centers’ new practice of requiring “proof of citizenship” yesterday. His office then verified that Ben Archer was employing this practice at school-based health clinics, for scheduled appointments at standalone clinics, and for same-day appointment requests. In defense of their actions, Ben Archer leadership pointed to President Donald Trump’s Executive Order, “Ending Taxpayer Subsidization of Open Borders,” which was issued on February 19, 2025, but has no bearing on the provision of health care to non-citizens. In fact, New Mexico and federal law both require Ben Archer Health Centers and other similarly funded health centers in the United States to provide health care to all residents of the area the center serves.

    In a post published to his social media yesterday morning, Heinrich condemned Ben Archer Health Centers for turning away patients without birth certificates on-hand at their clinics. Heinrich later welcomed news that the policy had been reversed, but has since received reports that the reversal is not being implemented consistently.

    “We write to request that you investigate whether Ben Archer Health Centers’ (BAHC) denial of medical care to individuals unable to provide “proof of citizenship,” potentially denying care to U.S. citizens, violated federal or state law and to take appropriate legal action pursuant to those findings. BAHC operates 11 clinics throughout southern New Mexico and is funded by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, alongside the State of New Mexico and Doña Ana County. This federal and state support creates not only an ethical, but legal obligation to provide quality primary health care to all New Mexicans, addressing the urgent needs of medically underserved residents in our state. We are concerned that similar actions could undermine medical care across New Mexico if BAHC is not held accountable for their neglect of this principal duty,” the lawmakers wrote in their letter to New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez.

    On February 26, the lawmakers received multiple, verified reports of Ben Archer Health Centers denying medical care to New Mexicans who were unable to provide proof of U.S. citizenship. One report was from an insulin-dependent patient with diabetes who was unable to refill their insulin prescription, and another report was from a patient who states they were unable to refill their psychotropic medication at Ben Archer Health Centers’ onsite pharmacy. Another individual sent a photo of a public posting at a school-based clinic in Las Cruces stating, “any ineligible alien who entered the United States illegally or is otherwise unlawfully present in the United States does not qualify for federally funded services at Ben Archer Health Centers.”

    Ben Archer Health Centers operate clinics at three of Las Cruces Public Schools’ (LCPS) high schools. After receiving calls from the New Mexico Department of Health and the Primary Care Association of New Mexico, Ben Archer took down the posted notices. However, in visits to Ben Archer Health Centers since the reversal, constituents have experienced inconsistent requirements to access health services.

    “A west Texas measles outbreak killed a school-age child just yesterday, and New Mexico’s Department of Health has confirmed nine cases of measles in Lea County. At a moment when access to vaccinations and treatment are paramount, the last thing a family needs when attending an appointment at their local school-based clinic — funded by federal, state, and county dollars — is to be turned away unless they prove citizenship,” the lawmakers stated.

    The lawmakers also emphasized that Ben Archer Health Centers appears to be violating both state and federal law.  

    “BAHC’s unilateral decision to require documentation of citizenship as a prerequisite to providing health care at their clinics is not only unreasonably burdensome for New Mexican families, we believe it also violates the law… Despite their citing of President Donald Trump’s Executive Order, “Ending Taxpayer Subsidization of Open Borders,” as justification for their actions, that executive order has no bearing on health centers’ provision of heath care to non-citizens and does not supersede applicable law,” the lawmakers declared.

    “We are aware of constituents who have been directly impacted by BAHC’s actions and can provide additional information upon request. While we believe that the vast majority of these vital health care providers are committed to serving vulnerable New Mexicans, we urge you to investigate these allegations against BAHC, determine the extent to which the practice is continuing, and hold them accountable on behalf of patients across our state,” the lawmakers concluded.

    The text of the letter is here and below:

    Dear Attorney General Torrez,

    We write to request that you investigate whether Ben Archer Health Centers’ (BAHC) denial of medical care to individuals unable to provide “proof of citizenship,” potentially denying care to U.S. citizens, violated federal or state law and to take appropriate legal action pursuant to those findings. BAHC operates 11 clinics throughout southern New Mexico and is funded by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, alongside the State of New Mexico and Doña Ana County.  This federal and state support creates not only an ethical, but legal obligation to provide quality primary health care to all New Mexicans, addressing the urgent needs of medically underserved residents in our state.  We are concerned that similar actions could undermine medical care across New Mexico if BAHC is not held accountable for their neglect of this principal duty. 

    On February 26, we received multiple, verified reports of BAHC denying medical care to New Mexicans who were unable to provide proof of U.S. citizenship.  One report was from an insulin-dependent patient with diabetes who was unable to refill their insulin prescription, and another report was from a patient who states they were unable to refill their psychotropic medication at Ben Archer’s onsite pharmacy. Another individual sent a photo of a public posting at a school-based clinic in Las Cruces stating, “any ineligible alien who entered the United States illegally or is otherwise unlawfully present in the United States does not qualify for federally funded services at Ben Archer Health Centers.” BAHC operates clinics at three of Las Cruces Public Schools’ (LCPS) high schools. After receiving calls from the New Mexico Department of Health and the Primary Care Association of New Mexico, BAHC took down the posted notices. However, a brief phone call between LCPS Superintendent, Ignacio Ruiz, and Ben Archer’s Chief Financial Officer indicates BAHC will continue to demand proof of citizenship prior to rendering health services.

    A west Texas measles outbreak killed a school-age child just yesterday, and New Mexico’s Department of Health has confirmed nine cases of measles in Lea County. At a moment when access to vaccinations and treatment are paramount, the last thing a family needs when attending an appointment at their local school-based clinic — funded by federal, state, and county dollars — is to be turned away unless they prove citizenship.

    BAHC’s unilateral decision to require documentation of citizenship as a prerequisite to providing health care at their clinics is not only unreasonably burdensome for New Mexican families, we believe it also violates the law. BAHC advertises their status as a Health Center Program grantee under 42 U.S.C. § 254b on the front page. of their website. Pursuant to subsection (a)(1)-(2) of that statute, health centers like BAHC are required to provide services for all residents within the area served by the center. Despite their citing of President Donald Trump’s Executive Order, “Ending Taxpayer Subsidization of Open Borders,” as justification for their actions, that executive order has no bearing on health centers’ provision of heath care to non-citizens and does not supersede applicable law.

    Additionally, BAHC’s actions are likely in violation of NM Stat § 24A-1-20 (2024). Section 24A-1(A)-(B) of that statute provides that state or local health benefits, therein defined as “any health benefit for which payments, assistance or health care services are provided to an individual, household or family eligibility unit by…appropriated funds of the state, a county, a local government…,” must be provided to all non-citizens, regardless of immigration status, if they meet the eligibility requirements for those benefits. Again, BAHC’s website clearly states that, in addition to federal funding, they receive funding from New Mexico state agencies, including the Department of Health, the Children, Youth, & Families Department, and the Human Services Department, as well as Doña Ana County.

    BAHC’s demands that patients produce proof of U.S. citizenship in order to receive basic health care appear to violate both state and federal law.  Their actions also unquestionably run counter to BAHC’s mission statement emphasizing access to health services for underserved populations.  Health Centers in New Mexico are currently serving over 331,000 patients, including 17,262 homeless, 18,934 school-based, and 6,596 Veteran patients. Altogether, over 15% of New Mexico’s residents are served by Health Centers with 51% of those residents being under the poverty line. We are aware of constituents who have been directly impacted by BAHC’s actions and can provide additional information upon request. While we believe that the vast majority of these vital health care providers are committed to serving vulnerable New Mexicans, we urge you to investigate these allegations against BAHC, determine the extent to which the practice is continuing, and hold them accountable on behalf of patients across our state.

    Sincerely,

    MIL OSI USA News –

    February 28, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Submissions: Global: Failure to consult Indigenous Peoples on future pandemics will further harm children’s education – Amnesty International

    Source: Amnesty International

    The failure of governments around the world to consult Indigenous Peoples on Covid-19 school closures and other emergency pandemic responses violated their rights, as children continue to feel the effects five years after the first global lockdown, Amnesty International said in a new report today.

    Indigenous leaders interviewed by Amnesty International for its report What If Indigenous Consent Is Not Respected?, testified to sharp and sustained increases in post-pandemic absenteeism and school dropout rates, of more than 80 per cent in some cases, among Indigenous children in more than 10 countries. Indigenous leaders and activists also voiced concerns that the often discriminatory, desultory or non-existent response by authorities to the educational needs of Indigenous children during the pandemic worsened long-standing inequities faced by Indigenous communities – with Indigenous girls and children with disabilities particularly disadvantaged. Going forward, the organization is calling for Indigenous Peoples to be consulted during future pandemics.  (ref. https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/pol40/8959/2025/en/ )

    “The Indigenous leaders and activists we spoke to felt completely ignored by governments during the pandemic, which had an enduring and damaging impact on their rights and prospects,” said Chris Chapman, Amnesty International’s Researcher on Indigenous Rights.

    “They said that remote learning solutions were often unavailable to Indigenous children. Those in rural areas, where Indigenous communities often lacked devices, internet connections, electricity and the technological knowledge or capacity to participate in virtual classes or remote learning, were worst affected.”

    When lower-tech solutions such as printed materials were distributed to other groups, Indigenous communities in several different countries said they were passed over, ignored, or asked to pay for them.

    Indigenous campaigner Sylvia Kokunda said: “For the most part these materials were distributed by the local government, since it can be easier for the village chairperson to identify the people in this community. However, local officials would not give the materials to these Batwa people, they would give only to their people.”

    Radio or television-based educational broadcasting during the pandemic was often unavailable in Indigenous languages. An Ogiek activist said that although Sogoot FM 97.1, an Ogiek language radio station, was used to reach the community to inform them about Covid-19 and its impacts, it was not used for school coursework.  

    The report is based on data and more than 80 interviews or collected responses that Amnesty International gathered to explore how Indigenous students around the world were impacted by pandemic-related school closures, including in Democratic Republic of Congo, India, Kenya, Mexico, Nepal, Russia, Taiwan and Uganda. There are 476 million Indigenous people worldwide in more than 90 countries, belonging to 5,000 different Indigenous groups and speaking more than 4,000 languages.

    Technology, discrimination and dropout rates

    Where Indigenous families had limited access to technology for remote learning during the pandemic, boys were often prioritized.

    According to Indigenous women activists from Nepal, “If some families have a mobile, then only one or two will use it. And if there are more children in the house, one has to sacrifice their education. When it comes to the sacrifice, the girls are sacrificed more.”

    Even if Indigenous students had devices capable of being used for remote learning, their families were sometimes unable to afford sufficient data. In addition, remote teaching was rarely provided in Indigenous languages.

    Children with learning difficulties or disabilities which required specialist teaching, for instance through use of sign language or braille, were often excluded, including among Indigenous communities.

    Interviewees in many states said there was often little or no government monitoring, or consideration of the effectiveness of alternative learning initiatives for Indigenous communities. Information on how to access education when schools closed – and they stayed shut for more than 18 months in some countries – was rarely provided in Indigenous languages.

    Students with little or no access to education during the pandemic often worked instead, and never returned to schools when they reopened. Those who did return when schools reopened, often found that they had fallen behind their classmates. If they were unwilling to retake a year, or could not be supported financially, they too dropped out.

    In Kenya, the majority of dropouts of Ogiek students were girls, especially girls who got pregnant during Covid-19 or were subjected to early marriage. However, it affected boys too. An Indigenous activist from Kenya said: “Boys between the ages of 12 and 18 who had begun working in jobs such as motorcycle taxi drivers or farm workers to earn money for themselves and their families also dropped out.”

    Some schools across many states never reopened, further reducing access to education for Indigenous children, Indigenous activists reported.

    Asked to reply to Amnesty’s findings, the Mexican government stated that it responded to the “unprecedented challenge of Covid-19″ by working with Indigenous schools and teachers to roll out a set of measures including distributing materials in five Indigenous languages, sometimes in printed formats where access to internet or devices was restricted, developing new digital educational materials, and capacity-building for schools and parents to use digital platforms.

    Recommendations

    “Significantly more resources are now required to safeguard, restore and improve the educational opportunities and rights of Indigenous communities,” Chris Chapman said.

    “States must work with Indigenous communities to immediately restore and enhance the right to education for all Indigenous children including a focus on re-enrolling Indigenous girls, and Indigenous students with disabilities.”  

    Alongside the report, Amnesty International has shared a guide for researchers who wish to investigate the extent to which the human right to participate effectively in decision-making has been violated, especially when it comes to Indigenous communities. (ref. https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/pol30/8958/2025/en/ )

    “Governments must consult with Indigenous Peoples on Covid-19 response measures and other pandemic and emergency response measures, otherwise they risk violating their right to consultation, and their right to give or withhold their consent to decisions affecting them. Our study highlights the risks of failing to take into account the realities, cultures and rights of Indigenous Peoples,” said Chris Chapman.

    “While our report sets out the devastating impact of this lack of inclusion, it’s hoped that Amnesty’s guide will ensure Indigenous people are included in discussions that affect them in the future. Every child has the right to free, high-quality primary education. States must therefore ensure that no child is left behind.”

    MIL OSI – Submitted News –

    February 28, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Attorney General Pamela Bondi Announces 29 Wanted Defendants from Mexico Taken into U.S. Custody

    Source: US State of North Dakota

    Today, the United States secured custody of 29 defendants from Mexico who are facing charges in districts around the country relating to racketeering, drug-trafficking, murder, illegal use of firearms, money laundering, and other crimes. The defendants taken into U.S. custody today include leaders and managers of drug cartels recently designated as Foreign Terrorist Organizations and Specially Designated Global Terrorists, such as the Sinaloa Cartel, Cártel de Jalisco Nueva Generación (CJNG), Cártel del Noreste (formerly Los Zetas), La Nueva Familia Michoacana, and Cártel de Golfo (Gulf Cartel).  These defendants are collectively alleged to have been responsible for the importation into the United States of massive quantities of poison, including cocaine, methamphetamine, fentanyl, and heroin, as well as associated acts of violence.

    “As President Trump has made clear, cartels are terrorist groups, and this Department of Justice is devoted to destroying cartels and transnational gangs,” said Attorney General Pamela Bondi. “We will prosecute these criminals to the fullest extent of the law in honor of the brave law enforcement agents who have dedicated their careers — and in some cases, given their lives — to protect innocent people from the scourge of violent cartels. We will not rest until we secure justice for the American people.”

    “The FBI and our partners will scour the ends of the earth to bring terrorists and cartel members to justice,” said FBI Director Kash Patel. “The era of harming Americans and walking free is over.”

    “Today’s actions are a consequence of a White House that negotiates from a position of strength, and an Attorney General who is willing to lead the Department with courage and ferocity,” said Acting Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove. “By prosecuting these defendants to the maximum extent allowable under the law, we honor the memory of Special Agent Camarena, Deputy Sherrif Byrd, and other victims who are far too numerous, as well as decades of hard work in the trenches by our law enforcement partners.”

    “Today, 29 fugitive cartel members have arrived in the United States from Mexico, including one name that stands above the rest for the men and women of the DEA — Rafael Caro Quintero. Caro Quintero, a cartel kingpin who unleashed violence, destruction, and death across the United States and Mexico, has spent four decades atop DEA’s most wanted fugitives list, and today we can proudly say he has arrived in the United States where justice will be served,” said DEA Acting Administrator Derek S. Maltz. “This moment is extremely personal for the men and women of DEA who believe Caro Quintero is responsible for the brutal torture and murder of DEA Special Agent Enrique “Kiki” Camarena. It is also a victory for the Camarena family. Today sends a message to every cartel leader, every trafficker, every criminal poisoning our communities: You will be held accountable. No matter how long it takes, no matter how far you run, justice will find you.”

    Many of the defendants were subject to longstanding U.S. extradition requests that were not honored during the prior Administration, but that the Mexican government elected to transfer to the current U.S. government in response to the Justice Department’s efforts pursuant to President Trump’s directive in Executive Order 14157, entitled Designating Cartels and Other Organizations as Foreign Terrorist Organizations and Specially Designated Global Terrorists, to pursue total elimination of these Cartels. Federal prosecutors will evaluate whether additional terrorism and violence charges are appropriate based on the policy set forth in Executive Order 14157, and whether capital punishment is available based on Executive Order 14164, entitled Restoring the Death Penalty and Protecting Public Safety, as well as the Attorney General’s Feb. 5 guidance regarding the death penalty.

    • Rafael Caro Quintero, who is alleged to have been among those responsible for the 1985 murder of DEA agent Enrique “Kiki” Camarena and others.
    • Martin Sotelo, who is alleged to have participated in the 2022 murder of Deputy Sheriff Ned Byrd.
    • Antonio Oseguera Cervantes, who allegedly helped lead CJNG and is reportedly the brother of Nemesio Oseguera Cervantes, also known as “El Mencho.”
    • Ramiro Perez Moreno and Lucio Hernandez Lechuga, who are alleged to be high-ranking members of Los Zetas.

    A complete list of defendants, as well as districts where they are charged and will appear in federal court in the coming days:

    Mexico Defendants

      Name

    Arraignment

    Jurisdiction

    Statutory Maximum
    1 CANOBBIO-INZUNZA, Jose Angel Northern District Illinois Up to life imprisonment
    2. VALENCIA GONZALEZ, Norberto Northern District of Illinois Up to life imprisonment
    3. MARTIN SOTELO, Alder, also known as “Alder Martin-Sotelo” and “Alder Alfonso Marin”

    Middle District of North Carolina

    North Carolina State Court

    Federal: Maximum 10 years imprisonment

    State: Maximum of life imprisonment or death

    4. CRUZ SANCHEZ, Evaristo Southern District of Texas Up to life imprisonment
    5. GARCIA VILLANO, also known as “La Kena,” “19,” and “Ciclone 19” Southern District of Texas Up to life imprisonment
    6. HERNANDEZ LECHUGA, Lucio Eastern District of Texas Up to life imprisonment
    7. PEREZ MORENO, Ramiro Eastern District of Texas Up to life imprisonment
    8. RODRIGUEZ DIAZ, Miguel Angel, also known as “Metro” Eastern District of Texas Up to life imprisonment
    9. VILLARREAL HERNANDEZ, Jose Rodolfo Northern District of Texas Death or life imprisonment
    10. CARO QUINTERO, Rafael Eastern District of New York Death or life imprisonment
    11. CARRILLO FUENTES, Vicente Eastern District of New York Death or life imprisonment
    12. CABRERA CABRERA, Jose Bibiano District of Arizona Up to life imprisonment
    13. CLARK, Andrew Central District of California Death or life imprisonment
    14. INFANTE, Hector Eduardo Central District of California Up to life imprisonment
    15. LIMON LOPEZ, Jesus Humberto District of Arizona Up to life imprisonment
    16. TAPIA QUINTERO, Jose Guadalupe District of Arizona Up to life imprisonment
    17. TORRES ACOSTA, Inez Enrique Southern District of California Up to life imprisonment
    18. GALAVIZ VEGA, Jesus Western District of Texas Up to life imprisonment
    19. MENDEZ ESTEVANE, Luis Geraldo Western District of Texas Death or life imprisonment
    20. MONSIVAIS TREVINO, Carlos Alberto Western District of Texas Up to life imprisonment
    21. ALGREDO VAZQUEZ, Carlos District of Columbia Up to life imprisonment
    22. LOPEZ IBARRA, Rodolfo District of Columbia Up to life imprisonment
    23. OSEGUERA CERVANTES, Antonio District of Columbia Up to life imprisonment
    24. RANGEL BUENDIA, Alfredo District of Columbia Up to life imprisonment
    25. TREVINO MORALES, Miguel Angel, also known as “Z-40” District of Columbia Up to life imprisonment
    26. TREVINO MORALES, Omar, also known as “Z-42”) District of Columbia Up to life imprisonment
    27. VALENCIA SALAZAR, Erick District of Columbia Up to life imprisonment
    28. MENDEZ VARGAS, Jesus Southern District of New York Up to life imprisonment
    29. PALACIOS GARCIA, Itiel Southern District of New York Up to life imprisonment

    Attorney General Pamela Bondi thanked the law enforcement officers of the Drug Enforcement Administration, FBI, U.S. Marshal’s Service, and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement – Homeland Security Investigations, and Hidalgo County Sheriff’s Office for their valuable contributions to these investigations.

    The Attorney General also thanked the Justice Department Criminal Division’s Narcotic and Dangerous Drug Section and its Office of International Affairs, and the U.S. Attorneys’ Offices for the District of Arizona, Central District of California, Southern District of California, the District of Columbia, Middle District of North Carolina, Northern District of Illinois, Eastern District of New York, Southern District of New York, Northern District of Texas, Eastern District of Texas, Southern District of Texas, and Western District of Texas for handling the prosecutions of these cases.

    An indictment is merely an allegation. All defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    February 28, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Security: Attorney General Pamela Bondi Announces 29 Wanted Defendants from Mexico Taken into U.S. Custody

    Source: United States Attorneys General

    Today, the United States secured custody of 29 defendants from Mexico who are facing charges in districts around the country relating to racketeering, drug-trafficking, murder, illegal use of firearms, money laundering, and other crimes. The defendants taken into U.S. custody today include leaders and managers of drug cartels recently designated as Foreign Terrorist Organizations and Specially Designated Global Terrorists, such as the Sinaloa Cartel, Cártel de Jalisco Nueva Generación (CJNG), Cártel del Noreste (formerly Los Zetas), La Nueva Familia Michoacana, and Cártel de Golfo (Gulf Cartel).  These defendants are collectively alleged to have been responsible for the importation into the United States of massive quantities of poison, including cocaine, methamphetamine, fentanyl, and heroin, as well as associated acts of violence.

    “As President Trump has made clear, cartels are terrorist groups, and this Department of Justice is devoted to destroying cartels and transnational gangs,” said Attorney General Pamela Bondi. “We will prosecute these criminals to the fullest extent of the law in honor of the brave law enforcement agents who have dedicated their careers — and in some cases, given their lives — to protect innocent people from the scourge of violent cartels. We will not rest until we secure justice for the American people.”

    “The FBI and our partners will scour the ends of the earth to bring terrorists and cartel members to justice,” said FBI Director Kash Patel. “The era of harming Americans and walking free is over.”

    “Today’s actions are a consequence of a White House that negotiates from a position of strength, and an Attorney General who is willing to lead the Department with courage and ferocity,” said Acting Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove. “By prosecuting these defendants to the maximum extent allowable under the law, we honor the memory of Special Agent Camarena, Deputy Sherrif Byrd, and other victims who are far too numerous, as well as decades of hard work in the trenches by our law enforcement partners.”

    “Today, 29 fugitive cartel members have arrived in the United States from Mexico, including one name that stands above the rest for the men and women of the DEA — Rafael Caro Quintero. Caro Quintero, a cartel kingpin who unleashed violence, destruction, and death across the United States and Mexico, has spent four decades atop DEA’s most wanted fugitives list, and today we can proudly say he has arrived in the United States where justice will be served,” said DEA Acting Administrator Derek S. Maltz. “This moment is extremely personal for the men and women of DEA who believe Caro Quintero is responsible for the brutal torture and murder of DEA Special Agent Enrique “Kiki” Camarena. It is also a victory for the Camarena family. Today sends a message to every cartel leader, every trafficker, every criminal poisoning our communities: You will be held accountable. No matter how long it takes, no matter how far you run, justice will find you.”

    Many of the defendants were subject to longstanding U.S. extradition requests that were not honored during the prior Administration, but that the Mexican government elected to transfer to the current U.S. government in response to the Justice Department’s efforts pursuant to President Trump’s directive in Executive Order 14157, entitled Designating Cartels and Other Organizations as Foreign Terrorist Organizations and Specially Designated Global Terrorists, to pursue total elimination of these Cartels. Federal prosecutors will evaluate whether additional terrorism and violence charges are appropriate based on the policy set forth in Executive Order 14157, and whether capital punishment is available based on Executive Order 14164, entitled Restoring the Death Penalty and Protecting Public Safety, as well as the Attorney General’s Feb. 5 guidance regarding the death penalty.

    • Rafael Caro Quintero, who is alleged to have been among those responsible for the 1985 murder of DEA agent Enrique “Kiki” Camarena and others.
    • Martin Sotelo, who is alleged to have participated in the 2022 murder of Deputy Sheriff Ned Byrd.
    • Antonio Oseguera Cervantes, who allegedly helped lead CJNG and is reportedly the brother of Nemesio Oseguera Cervantes, also known as “El Mencho.”
    • Ramiro Perez Moreno and Lucio Hernandez Lechuga, who are alleged to be high-ranking members of Los Zetas.

    A complete list of defendants, as well as districts where they are charged and will appear in federal court in the coming days:

    Mexico Defendants

      Name

    Arraignment

    Jurisdiction

    Statutory Maximum
    1 CANOBBIO-INZUNZA, Jose Angel Northern District Illinois Up to life imprisonment
    2. VALENCIA GONZALEZ, Norberto Northern District of Illinois Up to life imprisonment
    3. MARTIN SOTELO, Alder, also known as “Alder Martin-Sotelo” and “Alder Alfonso Marin”

    Middle District of North Carolina

    North Carolina State Court

    Federal: Maximum 10 years imprisonment

    State: Maximum of life imprisonment or death

    4. CRUZ SANCHEZ, Evaristo Southern District of Texas Up to life imprisonment
    5. GARCIA VILLANO, also known as “La Kena,” “19,” and “Ciclone 19” Southern District of Texas Up to life imprisonment
    6. HERNANDEZ LECHUGA, Lucio Eastern District of Texas Up to life imprisonment
    7. PEREZ MORENO, Ramiro Eastern District of Texas Up to life imprisonment
    8. RODRIGUEZ DIAZ, Miguel Angel, also known as “Metro” Eastern District of Texas Up to life imprisonment
    9. VILLARREAL HERNANDEZ, Jose Rodolfo Northern District of Texas Death or life imprisonment
    10. CARO QUINTERO, Rafael Eastern District of New York Death or life imprisonment
    11. CARRILLO FUENTES, Vicente Eastern District of New York Death or life imprisonment
    12. CABRERA CABRERA, Jose Bibiano District of Arizona Up to life imprisonment
    13. CLARK, Andrew Central District of California Death or life imprisonment
    14. INFANTE, Hector Eduardo Central District of California Up to life imprisonment
    15. LIMON LOPEZ, Jesus Humberto District of Arizona Up to life imprisonment
    16. TAPIA QUINTERO, Jose Guadalupe District of Arizona Up to life imprisonment
    17. TORRES ACOSTA, Inez Enrique Southern District of California Up to life imprisonment
    18. GALAVIZ VEGA, Jesus Western District of Texas Up to life imprisonment
    19. MENDEZ ESTEVANE, Luis Geraldo Western District of Texas Death or life imprisonment
    20. MONSIVAIS TREVINO, Carlos Alberto Western District of Texas Up to life imprisonment
    21. ALGREDO VAZQUEZ, Carlos District of Columbia Up to life imprisonment
    22. LOPEZ IBARRA, Rodolfo District of Columbia Up to life imprisonment
    23. OSEGUERA CERVANTES, Antonio District of Columbia Up to life imprisonment
    24. RANGEL BUENDIA, Alfredo District of Columbia Up to life imprisonment
    25. TREVINO MORALES, Miguel Angel, also known as “Z-40” District of Columbia Up to life imprisonment
    26. TREVINO MORALES, Omar, also known as “Z-42”) District of Columbia Up to life imprisonment
    27. VALENCIA SALAZAR, Erick District of Columbia Up to life imprisonment
    28. MENDEZ VARGAS, Jesus Southern District of New York Up to life imprisonment
    29. PALACIOS GARCIA, Itiel Southern District of New York Up to life imprisonment

    Attorney General Pamela Bondi thanked the law enforcement officers of the Drug Enforcement Administration, FBI, U.S. Marshal’s Service, and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement – Homeland Security Investigations, and Hidalgo County Sheriff’s Office for their valuable contributions to these investigations.

    The Attorney General also thanked the Justice Department Criminal Division’s Narcotic and Dangerous Drug Section and its Office of International Affairs, and the U.S. Attorneys’ Offices for the District of Arizona, Central District of California, Southern District of California, the District of Columbia, Middle District of North Carolina, Northern District of Illinois, Eastern District of New York, Southern District of New York, Northern District of Texas, Eastern District of Texas, Southern District of Texas, and Western District of Texas for handling the prosecutions of these cases.

    An indictment is merely an allegation. All defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.

    MIL Security OSI –

    February 28, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Security: Three Defendants Sentenced To Prison For Methamphetamine Trafficking Conspiracy

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    RENO – Three individuals were sentenced Tuesday for their involvement in a drug trafficking organization to distribute large quantities of methamphetamine in Reno. They all participated in multiple drug buys involving pounds of methamphetamine for thousands of dollars, totaling over 33 kilograms of methamphetamine distributed into Reno. 

    Saul Nolasco (25), of Lodi, California, and Maria Valenzuela (64) and Xochitl Sanchez-Pacheco (38), both of Sinaloa, Mexico, each pleaded guilty to conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute a controlled substance. United States District Judge Miranda M. Du sentenced Nolasco to 41 months in prison; Valenzuela to 33 months in prison, and Sanchez-Pacheco to 30 months in prison. 

    According to court documents and admissions made in court, from January 20, 2023 to October 8, 2023, Nolasco, Valenzuela, and Sanchez-Pacheco conspired together to distribute 33 kilograms of methamphetamine into the Reno community. Methamphetamine is a Schedule II controlled substance. 

    Nolasco worked with his brother who was located in Mexico. Nolasco acted as the drug trafficking organization’s boots on the ground in Nevada and California. He collected and handled cash payments; obtained and stored large quantities of methamphetamine at his house; and distributed large quantities of methamphetamine to various buyers in Reno and elsewhere. 

    Valenzuela conducted multiple drug transactions involving pounds of methamphetamine, where she was responsible for the delivery of methamphetamine as well as the collection of cash payments of thousands of dollars behalf of the drug trafficking organization. In November 2023, Valenzuela was caught at the border with her daughter moving 97 pounds of methamphetamine across the U.S.-Mexico border. The van was outfitted with trap compartments used to conceal the drugs.

    Sanchez-Pacheco delivered large quantities of methamphetamine in both Reno and Modesto, California. She collected the money associated with those deliveries, one of which involved $5,500.

    The fourth co-defendant, Bobby Jo Kissel (54), pleaded guilty in October 2024 and is awaiting sentencing.

    Acting United States Attorney Sue Fahami for the District of Nevada and Assistant Special Agent in Charge Kevin Adams for the DEA Las Vegas District Office made the announcement.

    The DEA investigated the case, along with the Regional Narcotics Unit, Washoe County Sherriff’s Office K-9 Unit, Modesto Police Department, HSI, USMS, Nevada Department of Investigation and Nevada Highway Patrol. Assistant United States Attorney Andolyn Johnson prosecuted the case.

    This case is part of an Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Forces (OCDETF) operation. OCDETF identifies, disrupts, and dismantles the highest-level criminal organizations that threaten the United States using a prosecutor-led, intelligence-driven, multi-agency approach. Additional information about the OCDETF Program can be found at www.justice.gov/OCDETF.

    ###

     

     

    MIL Security OSI –

    February 28, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Luján Reintroduces Bill to Strengthen Safeguards That Prevent Public Officials From Using Their Power for Political Gain, Protect Integrity of Government

    US Senate News:

    Source: US Senator for New Mexico Ben Ray Luján
    Washington, D.C. – U.S. Senator Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.) reintroduced the Hatch Act Enforcement Transparency and Accountability Act. This legislation strengthens Congressional oversight of the Hatch Act, particularly in instances when the Office of the Special Counsel decides to forgo enforcement. U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.) is an original cosponsor of the legislation. Congressman Robert Garcia (D-Calif.) leads companion legislation in the House of Representatives. 
    “The Hatch Act is designed to prevent public officials from using their position for political gain. Now, at this critical moment, the actions of the Trump administration and Elon Musk have shown the American people the importance of accountability and protecting the rule of law,” said Senator Luján. “That is why I am proud to reintroduce my legislation that increases enforcement of the Hatch Act by providing clarity and Congressional oversight for any potential abuses. I look forward to working with my colleagues to pass this legislation to increase accountability of this administration and future ones, and to ensure Americans can have confidence in the public servants who work for them.”
    “With President Trump and Elon Musk hellbent on misusing the federal government for their own personal gains and vendettas, it’s never been more important that Congress strengthen the laws we have in place to improve transparency and accountability for the American people. I’m proud to support this bill to hold this administration and future administrations accountable to ensure government works for New Mexico families — not Republicans’ billionaire friends,” said Senator Heinrich. 
    “Unchecked political influence from powerful individuals like President Trump and Elon Musk poses a real threat to our democracy. When these figures and their associates are allowed to operate without consequences or when they attempt to pressure nonpartisan federal workers to serve their political interests, it puts the integrity of our government on the line,” said Congressman Garcia. “We can’t just sit back and let those in power break the rules that keep our government fair and unbiased. That is why I am proud to lead this bill in the House to make sure these individuals are held accountable and to ensure the Hatch Act is enforced.”
    “We need greater transparency at the Office of Special Counsel. This bill will better ensure the OSC can hold career official and political appointees accountable when they violate the law meant to keep partisan politics out of the federal government,” said Dylan Hedtler-Gaudette, Senior Government Affairs Manager, Project On Government Oversight (POGO).
    The Hatch Act was enacted in 1939 to prohibit federal employees from participating in specific political activities. The law aims to maintain nonpartisanship in the federal government’s operations, shield federal employees from political influence, and uphold merit-based promotions over political affiliations. However, the U.S Office of Special Counsel, which investigates and prosecutes violations of the Hatch Act, has at times failed to properly enforce this critical statue. 
    This legislation is endorsed by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) and The Project on Government Oversight (POGO).
    Full text of the bill is available here.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    February 28, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: As tariffs loom, Republicans block Senator Coons’ bill on Senate floor that would prevent President Trump from unilaterally imposing tariffs on allies

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Delaware Christopher Coons
    WASHINGTON – U.S. Senator Chris Coons (D-Del.) went to the Senate floor today to ask for unanimous consent to pass his Stopping Tariffs on Allies and Bolstering Legislative Exercise of (STABLE) Trade Policy Act. The legislation, co-led with Senator Tim Kaine (D-Va.), would prevent any president from imposing tariffs on U.S. allies and free trade partners without congressional approval.
    The STABLE Trade Policy Act would institute a requirement of congressional approval before a president could impose new tariffs on U.S. allies and free trade agreement partners. Currently, the president can impose tariffs on any nation using authorities that Congress created to combat national security risks and address international emergencies. President Trump has used these authorities to impose 25% tariffs on Mexico and Canada, which were set to go into place on February 1 and then delayed by a month. They are now expected to be implemented this coming week.
    In addition to the tariffs on Mexico and Canada, President Trump has also claimed he will impose “reciprocal” tariffs on the European Union and additional tariffs on all imports of steel, aluminum, microchips, pharmaceuticals and automobiles. Further rounds of tariffs against Mexico and Canada are also possible. Immediate passage of the STABLE Trade Policy Act would prevent President Trump from implementing these subsequent tariffs without congressional approval.
    “These tariffs will be disastrous for our economy and our national security,” Senator Coons said on the Senate floor. “These tariffs will cost the average American household about $1,200 a year. They’ll raise costs for avocados and appliances, diesel fuel and dog toys, car parts and Christmas tree lights, tomatoes and tequila––I could go on.”
    Senator Coons said that even if Trump delays the tariffs at the last minute, the uncertainty still raises costs for businesses and consumers. He emphasized that imposing tariffs on our closest allies and free trade partners will only weaken U.S. global standing and make our allies less likely to stand with us in the future.
    “These tariffs, if imposed, will make inflation worse and hit the lowest income Americans the hardest. They will impact American businesses, American families, and American communities,” said Senator Coons. “So, I hope that working together with my friends and colleagues here in the Senate, we can find ways to lower costs on pharmaceuticals and automobiles and microchips––but sparking tariff wars in our region and around the world is not the way to do that.”
    U.S. Senator Mike Crapo (R-Idaho) objected. 
    A video and transcript of Senator Coons’ comments are available below.
    WATCH HERE.
    Senator Coons: Mr. President, I rise today to seek unanimous consent for my STABLE Trade Policy Act with Senator Kaine––an act that would prevent any president from imposing tariffs on a U.S. ally or free trade agreement partner without congressional consent. I’ll make that motion in just a moment, but let me first just explain what this is and why I’m doing it. Next week, President Trump has announced plans to impose 25% tariffs on products coming into the United States from Mexico and Canada––our number one and number two trading partners. These tariffs will be disastrous for our economy and our national security. These tariffs will cost the average American household about $1,200 a year. They’ll raise costs for avocados and appliances, diesel fuel and dog toys, car parts and Christmas tree lights, tomatoes and tequila––I could go on. 
    Our economies are so closely integrated––the United States, Canada and Mexico–– that it will increase the cost of a GM pickup truck about $10,000, and even if these tariffs at the last minute are delayed, businesses are hurt by the uncertainty, which continues to increase costs. President Trump plans to follow those tariffs with reciprocal tariffs on the EU, which includes many of our critical NATO allies and closest partners. Imposing tariffs on our allies and partners diminishes our standing in the world and makes our neighbors less likely to help us in the future.
    It’s no surprise that Americans think this is a terrible idea. Barely a quarter of Americans think imposing tariffs on Canada are a good idea. More than double that disapprove. President Trump has already declared an economic emergency to justify imposing these tariffs on Mexico and Canada, but my bill with Senator Kaine would prevent him from abusing long established national security authorities to follow through on further tariff threats against our allies and FTA partners.
    The U.S. Constitution and the Commerce Clause – Article I, Section Eight – gives Congress jurisdiction over trade policy, and it’s time that we took ownership back, controlling the ability to impose tariffs willy-nilly on our trusted partners and allies by passing this bill and reining in President Trump’s costly and damaging ideas. And so, Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the Committee on Finance be discharged from further consideration of Senate Bill 348, and the Senate proceed to its immediate consideration, that the bill be considered [to be] read a third time and passed, and that the motion to reconsider be made and laid upon the table.
    …
    Senator Coons: Mr. President, I understand that Senator Crapo, the Chairman of the Finance Committee, a supporter of President Trump, has blocked this bill today, and I hope to find ways to work with him on improving market access and on elevating the quality and the capabilities of U.S. trade engagement with our partners. But I really don’t understand why President Trump seems so intent on harming one of his signature accomplishments––the USMCA. I’m disappointed because Congress gave the president authority to impose tariffs in the event of a national security crisis, Congress did not grant this power to pursue petty grudges against trusted neighbors. Honestly, how can anyone be angry at Canadians? They are the nicest people in the world, and yet here they are, working with us, pleading with us to not impose ruinous tariffs that would harm their economy and ours. 
    I’ll briefly then just make again a few simple points. I’m disappointed that President Trump isn’t doing more to reduce costs. He was elected in no small part because of high inflation and promised it would come down on day one. These tariffs, if imposed, will make inflation worse and hit the lowest income Americans the hardest. It will impact American business, American families, and American communities. 
    So, I hope that working together with my friends and colleagues here in the Senate, we can find ways to lower costs on pharmaceuticals and automobiles and microchips, but imposing reciprocal tariffs on trusted friends and allies,sparking tariffs wars in our region and around the world, is not the way to do that. Two-thirds of Americans already think that President Trump isn’t doing enough to lower costs. Blocking this bill will only accelerate that, if President Trump continues to act unwisely and bully and threaten our closest and most trusted partners. We must find a better way forward together.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    February 28, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Sens. Moran, Coons Introduce Legislation to Bolster Trade Negotiations with the United Kingdom

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Kansas – Jerry Moran

    WASHINGTON – U.S. Senators Jerry Moran (R-Kan.) and Chris Coons (D-Del.) today reintroduced the Undertaking Negotiations on Investment and Trade for Economic Dynamism (UNITED) Act. Their legislation would authorize the Trump Administration to reach a trade agreement with the United Kingdom that will open export opportunities for businesses of all sizes, strengthen critical supply chains and advance economic prosperity for people in both nations. The UNITED Act also requires the administration to work closely with Congress throughout the process to make certain that any agreement advances congressional trade policy priorities. Companion legislation was introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives by Congressmen Adrian Smith (R-Neb.) and Jim Himes (D-Conn.).

    The bill’s reintroduction comes as U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer arrives in Washington today to meet with President Trump at the White House.

    “Strengthening our economic relationship with the United Kingdom will bolster our strategic interests and create opportunities for American producers and businesses,” said Sen. Moran. “The U.K. is one of our oldest and closest allies, and creating a new free trade agreement would reduce consumer costs, increase production, and open new markets for a variety of industries, including Kansas agriculture, biofuels, and aerospace products.”

    “We should be building on the strong trade relationships and close partnership that we share with the United Kingdom. A comprehensive free trade agreement with the United Kingdom would advance both countries’ strategic and economic interests while creating new economic opportunities for Delaware workers, businesses, and consumers,” said Sen. Coons. “This bill demonstrates the strong bipartisan support in Congress for restarting negotiations with the U.K. on a trade deal that sets ambitious international standards for our shared priorities on climate, labor protections, digital trade, intellectual property rights, and many other areas.”

    “There’s no better way to strengthen ties with a historic partner like the United Kingdom than coming together to develop a comprehensive trade agreement,” said Rep. Smith. “In 2022, I had the opportunity to lead a bipartisan congressional delegation to the UK where I saw firsthand the value such an agreement holds for both our countries. In his first term, President Trump initiated trade talks with the UK and more broadly demonstrated his ability to negotiate deals of mutual benefit. Congress should do everything possible to keep pace and empower his vigorous engagement. The UNITED Act is a bipartisan effort to move into the future of rules-based trade relations by promoting expanded access to international markets eager for our products and safeguarding American innovation. I thank Representative Himes and Senators Moran and Coons for their cooperation on this legislation.”

    “Strong trade partners are critical to a prosperous economy—creating jobs, increasing opportunities for businesses, and bringing down costs for consumers,” said Rep. Himes. “The UNITED Act builds on our existing special relationship with the United Kingdom and paves the way for a new, comprehensive free trade agreement.”

    The U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), which passed the Senate with overwhelming bipartisan support in 2020, set high standards for fair and competitive trade. The UNITED Act encourages the executive branch to build on those standards in negotiations with the U.K. in order to make certain U.S. workers and companies can compete on a level playing field.

    The text of the bill is available here.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    February 28, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Cassidy, Grassley, Heinrich Applaud Senate Committee Passage of Legislation to Combat Illegal Fentanyl

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Louisiana Bill Cassidy

    WASHINGTON – U.S. Senators Bill Cassidy, M.D. (R-LA), Chuck Grassley (R-IA), and Martin Heinrich (D-NM) applaud the passage of the Halt Lethal Trafficking (HALT) Fentanyl Act by the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee. The HALT Fentanyl Act makes permanent the temporary classification of fentanyl-related substances as a Schedule I drug of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA). The drug’s Schedule I classification is set to expire on March 31, 2025. The HALT Fentanyl Act builds on the momentum of the Stopping Overdoses of Fentanyl Analogues (SOFA) Act introduced by U.S. Senator Ron Johnson (R-WI).
    “Chinese fentanyl was pouring into the U.S. under President Biden’s open border. Law enforcement needs every tool possible to combat this,” said Dr. Cassidy. “I am grateful for Chairman Grassley’s quick work to move this through the Judiciary Committee. Let’s make it law.”
    “The Senate Judiciary Committee’s broad, bipartisan passage of the HALT Fentanyl Act is an important step towards ending our nation’s deadly opioid epidemic,” said Senator Grassley. “Congress has a dwindling shot clock to pass this bill before fentanyl-related substances’ Schedule I status runs out. I urge my congressional colleagues to continue moving this legislation forward, so we can make permanent scheduling of fentanyl analogs the law of the land.” 
    “The HALT Fentanyl Act incorporates the permanent scheduling of fentanyl-related substances, which I first introduced in 2017 in the Stopping Overdoses of Fentanyl Analogues Act (SOFA). SOFA served as the template for the Trump administration’s temporary scheduling rule in 2018, and it recognizes the admirable devotion of Wisconsinites Dr. Tim Westlake and Lauri Badura. Ms. Badura founded Saving Others For Archie and made it her life’s mission to end the fentanyl crisis after losing her son, Archie, to fentanyl poisoning. I’m pleased SOFA will advance to the Senate floor under the HALT Fentanyl Act,”said Senator Johnson. 
    “I’m pleased that my HALT Fentanyl Act is one step closer to becoming law,” said Senator Heinrich. “My legislation now heads to the Senate floor, and I urge my colleagues to pass it. The HALT Fentanyl Act is urgently needed to help our law enforcement crack down on illegal trafficking, get deadly fentanyl out of our communities, and save lives.” 
    The bill now awaits a vote on the U.S. Senate floor. President Trump’s Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has confirmed that, if Congress passes the bill in its current form, the president will sign it.
    Additionally, the bill has 24 U.S. Senate cosponsors and is supported by 40 advocacy groups, including 25 State Attorneys General, 11 major law enforcement organizations, nine major medical associations and Facing Fentanyl, a coalition of over 200 impacted family groups.
    Background:
    Drug overdoses, largely driven by fentanyl, are the leading cause of death among young adults 18 to 45 years old. Synthetic opioids like fentanyl account for 66 percent of the total U.S. overdose deaths. According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), there were an estimated 107,543 drug overdose deaths in the U.S. in 2023. This was primarily fueled by synthetic opioids, including illegal fentanyl, which are largely manufactured in Mexico from raw materials supplied by China. In 2022, there were over 50.6 million fentanyl-laced fake prescription pills seized by the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), more than doubling the amount seized in 2021.
    In 2017, Johnson introduced SOFA in the U.S. Senate following the Wisconsin legislature’s unanimous adoption of a bill that mirrors the HALT Fentanyl Act. In 2019, Cassidy became a cosponsor of SOFA. 

    MIL OSI USA News –

    February 28, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: ICYMI: Grassley Secures Argentine President Milei’s Partnership in Credit Suisse Investigation into Nazi-Linked Accounts

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Iowa Chuck Grassley

    WASHINGTON – Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) is welcoming Argentine President Javier Milei’s commitment to support Grassley’s ongoing investigation into Credit Suisse and its historic servicing of Nazi-linked accounts. This includes providing archival records documenting the use of Nazi “ratlines.” Ratlines were monetary and logistic pathways Nazis used to escape justice and flee to Latin America, including Argentina, following World War II.

    “In order to continue this work, I respectfully request possession of Argentina’s archival records relating to Nazi ratlines. This includes records dating to the time before, during, and following World War II that will help shed light on the planning and carrying out of the Nazi ratlines. The great people of Argentina’s support in helping the Senate Judiciary Committee obtain possession would assist the committee in advancing its corresponding oversight of this matter,” Grassley wrote to Milei.

    Grassley will chair a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing next week focused on stemming the tide of antisemitism.
    Read additional background from the Times of Israel.                                  

    Argentine president opening files on Nazi ‘ratlines’ that trafficked Eichmann, Mengele

    By Matt Lebovic

    February 24, 2025

    Argentinian President Javier Milei promised officials of the Simon Wiesenthal Center his full cooperation in granting access to documents related to the financing of so-called “ratlines” that helped Nazis escape Europe after the Holocaust. The promise was made in Buenos Aires at the presidential palace, Casa Rosada, during a meeting with Milei and activists on Tuesday.

    For decades, organizations including the Simon Wiesenthal Center, named after the famed Nazi hunter, have sought records related to unofficial escape routes taken by thousands of Nazis during the years after World War II. Up to 10,000 Nazis and other fascist war criminals escaped justice by fleeing to Argentina and other countries.

    “While some previous leaders promised full cooperation to get to the hard truths that involved Argentina’s past, Milei is the first to act with lightning speed to enable the SWC to uncover important pieces of the historic puzzle, especially as it related to involvement with Nazis before, during and after the Holocaust,” Rabbi Abraham Cooper, associate dean of the Simon Wiesenthal Center, told The Times of Israel.

    …

    During the SWC meeting on Tuesday, Jonathan Missner, managing partner at Stein, Mitchell, Beato & Missner, brought a letter from US Senator Charles Grassley, chairman of the US Senate Judiciary Committee. The letter — which was handed to Milei — requested the Argentinian leader’s assistance in uncovering how the ratlines were organized and funded. A copy of the letter was sent to US President Donald Trump.

    …

    Nazis’ escape routes

    Several countries in the Americas received Nazis, including Canada, the US, and Mexico. Nazis also fled to Australia, Spain, and Switzerland. In some cases, US intelligence officials used ratlines to pluck top Nazi scientists away from Soviet orbits.

    One of two primary escape routes went through Germany and Spain, then across the Atlantic to Argentina…

    Up to 5,000 Nazis are said to have settled in Argentina, including Holocaust “architect” Adolf Eichmann and Josef Mengele, one of the most recognizable — and wanted — Nazis. Traveling along a ratline in 1948, the notorious Auschwitz physician used the new identity of Helmut Gregor when fleeing Europe.

    “These files will be instrumental in obtaining justice, which is instrumental to honoring the memory of those who suffered and died in the Holocaust,” said Cooper. “Especially in a post-October 7 world, those who financed, facilitated, or otherwise assisted these ratlines must be held accountable,” he said.

    …

    “Words are one thing — actions are another. President Milei’s historic decision signals his unequivocal allyship with the Jewish community while reinforcing his commitment to accountability and transparency at home,” Missner told The Times of Israel.

    Support for harboring Nazi war criminals went right to the top in Argentina, according to historians. President Juan Peron was angered by the Nuremberg Trials and authorized key facets of the escape routes, making them a state affair. In addition to German Nazis, the Peron regime and other South American governments aided war criminals from Hungary, Croatia and elsewhere.

    “President Milei is a staunch ally of the global Jewish community and was eager to open these archives. He knows that confronting Argentina’s history of Nazi collaboration requires nothing less than full transparency, and the same principle undergirds his pursuit of justice for the AMIA bombing,” said Missner.

    -30-

    MIL OSI USA News –

    February 28, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Fourteenth and Final Defendant Convicted in Federal Dog Fighting Case

    Source: US State of North Dakota

    All 14 defendants in a large-scale federal dog fighting case indicted last year in Albany, Georgia, have now been convicted. The U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia has accepted the guilty pleas of the following defendants:

    • Tamichael Elijah, 48, of Donalsonville, Georgia;
    • Marvin Pulley, III, 53, of Donalsonville and Jakin, Georgia;
    • Brandon Baker, 42, of Panama City, Florida;
    • Christopher Travis Beaumont, 38, of Panama City, Florida;
    • Herman Buggs, Jr., 57, of Donalsonville, Georgia;
    • Terrance Davis, 46, of Pansey, Alabama;
    • Timothy Freeman, 27, of Bainbridge, Georgia;
    • Terelle Ganzy, 35, of Panama City, Florida;
    • Gary Hopkins, 67, of Donalsonville, Georgia;
    • Cornelious Johnson, 40, of Panama City, Florida;
    • Rodrecus Kimble, 44, of Donalsonville, Georgia;
    • Donnametric Miller, 42, of Donalsonville, Georgia;
    • Willie Russell, 43, of Blakely, Georgia; and
    • Fredricus White, 36, of Panama City, Florida.

    According to court documents filed in this case, the defendants all converged on a property in Donalsonville, Georgia, on April 24, 2022, where they held a large-scale dog fighting event. The defendants and others brought a total of 24 pit bull-type dogs to be fought that weekend in a series of matches. Law enforcement personnel who disrupted the event found numerous dogs inside crates in cars on the property.

    The participants used their cars to store dogs who had already been fought, as well as those whose handlers were awaiting their turn in the fighting pit. Some dogs were kept on chains on the property. Law enforcement rescued a total of 27 dogs, including one found in the pit with severe injuries and which died a shortly thereafter. Dogs in the cars also bore recent injuries and historical fighting scars.

    Under federal law, it is illegal not only to fight dogs in a venture that affects interstate commerce, but also to possess, train, transport, deliver, sell, purchase or receive dogs for fighting purposes.

    All defendants but Freeman pleaded guilty to felony conspiracy to violate the animal fighting prohibition of the federal Animal Welfare Act. Defendants Beaumont and Miller also pleaded guilty to sponsoring or exhibiting (i.e., handling) a dog in a dog fight. Defendants Baker, Davis, Ganzy, Johnson, Pulley, and White further pleaded guilty to possessing and transporting a dog for purposes of using the dog in an animal fighting venture. Freeman pleaded guilty to spectating at an animal fight. Defendants Miller and Pulley also pleaded guilty to the unlawful possession of a firearm by a person with a prior felony conviction.

    Russell is set to be sentenced on Feb. 28. The court has not yet set sentencing dates for the other defendants. Each defendant faces maximum penalties of five years in prison and a $250,000 fine per count of animal fighting charges. Miller also faces a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison and a $250,000 fine on the firearm charge, and Pulley faces a maximum penalty of 15 years in prison on his firearm charge.

    Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Adam Gustafson of the Justice Department’s Environment and Natural Resources Division (ENRD) and Acting U.S. Attorney C. Shanelle Booker for the Middle District of Georgia made the announcement.

    The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Office of the Inspector General and detectives with the Seminole County, Georgia, Sheriff’s Office investigated the case. Detectives with the Bay County, Florda, Sheriff’s Office also provided invaluable assistance.

    Senior Trial Attorney Ethan Eddy and Trial Attorney Leigh Rendé of ENRD’s Environmental Crimes Section are prosecuting the case with assistance from Criminal Chief Leah McEwen of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Middle District of Georgia. Assistant U.S. Attorney Michael Morrill and Paralegal Kristi Cote for the Middle District of Georgia handled a parallel civil forfeiture proceeding to ensure that the dogs did not have to be returned to the defendants. The U.S. Attorney’s Offices for the Northern District of Florida and Middle District of Alabama also assisted with the dog rescue operation. 

    MIL OSI USA News –

    February 28, 2025
  • MIL-OSI United Nations: US funding cuts confirmed, ending lifesaving support for women and girls

    Source: United Nations 2

    27 February 2025 Humanitarian Aid

    The United States has cut $377 million worth of funding to the UN reproductive and sexual health agency, UNFPA, it was confirmed on Thursday, leading to potentially “devasting impacts”, on women and girls.

    “At 7pm on 26 February, UNFPA was informed that nearly all of our grants (48 as of now) with USAID and the US State Department have been terminated,” the UN agency said in a statement.

    “This decision will have devastating impacts on women and girls and the health and aid workers who serve them in the world’s worst humanitarian crises.”

    The USAID grants were designated to provide critical maternal healthcare, protection from violence, rape treatment and other lifesaving care in humanitarian settings.

    This includes UNFPA’s work to end maternal death, safely deliver babies and address horrific violence faced by women and girls in places like Gaza, Sudan and Ukraine.

    From Afghanistan to Ukraine

    The UN agency partners with 150 countries to provide access to a wide range of sexual and reproductive health services.

    Its goal is ending unmet needs for family planning, preventable maternal death, gender-based violence and harmful practices, including child marriage and female genital mutilation, by 2030.

    “These termination notices include grants for which we had previously received humanitarian waivers, as they were considered lifesaving interventions for the world’s most vulnerable women and girls,” UNFPA said.

    The grants funded programmes in countries including Afghanistan, Chad, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Haiti, Mali, Sudan, Syria and its neighbouring countries, as well as Ukraine.

    MIL OSI United Nations News –

    February 28, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Video: Secretary Rubio hosts a U.S.-Mexico interagency meeting with Mexican Foreign Secretary

    Source: United States of America – Department of State (video statements)

    Secretary of State Marco A. Rubio hosts a U.S.-Mexico interagency meeting with Mexican Foreign Secretary Juan Ramon de la Fuente at the Department of State, on February 27, 2025.

    ———-
    Under the leadership of the President and Secretary of State, the U.S. Department of State leads America’s foreign policy through diplomacy, advocacy, and assistance by advancing the interests of the American people, their safety and economic prosperity. On behalf of the American people we promote and demonstrate democratic values and advance a free, peaceful, and prosperous world.

    The Secretary of State, appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate, is the President’s chief foreign affairs adviser. The Secretary carries out the President’s foreign policies through the State Department, which includes the Foreign Service, Civil Service and U.S. Agency for International Development.

    Get updates from the U.S. Department of State at www.state.gov and on social media!
    Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/statedept
    X: https://x.com/StateDept
    Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/statedept
    Flickr: https://flickr.com/photos/statephotos/

    Subscribe to the State Department Blog: https://www.state.gov/blogs
    Watch on-demand State Department videos: https://video.state.gov/
    Subscribe to The Week at State e-newsletter: http://ow.ly/diiN30ro7Cw

    State Department website: https://www.state.gov/
    Careers website: https://careers.state.gov/
    White House website: https://www.whitehouse.gov/
    Terms of Use: https://state.gov/tou

    #StateDepartment #DepartmentofState #Diplomacy

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TQzuLykey4c

    MIL OSI Video –

    February 28, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Security: Fourteenth and Final Defendant Convicted in Federal Dog Fighting Case

    Source: United States Attorneys General

    All 14 defendants in a large-scale federal dog fighting case indicted last year in Albany, Georgia, have now been convicted. The U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia has accepted the guilty pleas of the following defendants:

    • Tamichael Elijah, 48, of Donalsonville, Georgia;
    • Marvin Pulley, III, 53, of Donalsonville and Jakin, Georgia;
    • Brandon Baker, 42, of Panama City, Florida;
    • Christopher Travis Beaumont, 38, of Panama City, Florida;
    • Herman Buggs, Jr., 57, of Donalsonville, Georgia;
    • Terrance Davis, 46, of Pansey, Alabama;
    • Timothy Freeman, 27, of Bainbridge, Georgia;
    • Terelle Ganzy, 35, of Panama City, Florida;
    • Gary Hopkins, 67, of Donalsonville, Georgia;
    • Cornelious Johnson, 40, of Panama City, Florida;
    • Rodrecus Kimble, 44, of Donalsonville, Georgia;
    • Donnametric Miller, 42, of Donalsonville, Georgia;
    • Willie Russell, 43, of Blakely, Georgia; and
    • Fredricus White, 36, of Panama City, Florida.

    According to court documents filed in this case, the defendants all converged on a property in Donalsonville, Georgia, on April 24, 2022, where they held a large-scale dog fighting event. The defendants and others brought a total of 24 pit bull-type dogs to be fought that weekend in a series of matches. Law enforcement personnel who disrupted the event found numerous dogs inside crates in cars on the property.

    The participants used their cars to store dogs who had already been fought, as well as those whose handlers were awaiting their turn in the fighting pit. Some dogs were kept on chains on the property. Law enforcement rescued a total of 27 dogs, including one found in the pit with severe injuries and which died a shortly thereafter. Dogs in the cars also bore recent injuries and historical fighting scars.

    Under federal law, it is illegal not only to fight dogs in a venture that affects interstate commerce, but also to possess, train, transport, deliver, sell, purchase or receive dogs for fighting purposes.

    All defendants but Freeman pleaded guilty to felony conspiracy to violate the animal fighting prohibition of the federal Animal Welfare Act. Defendants Beaumont and Miller also pleaded guilty to sponsoring or exhibiting (i.e., handling) a dog in a dog fight. Defendants Baker, Davis, Ganzy, Johnson, Pulley, and White further pleaded guilty to possessing and transporting a dog for purposes of using the dog in an animal fighting venture. Freeman pleaded guilty to spectating at an animal fight. Defendants Miller and Pulley also pleaded guilty to the unlawful possession of a firearm by a person with a prior felony conviction.

    Russell is set to be sentenced on Feb. 28. The court has not yet set sentencing dates for the other defendants. Each defendant faces maximum penalties of five years in prison and a $250,000 fine per count of animal fighting charges. Miller also faces a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison and a $250,000 fine on the firearm charge, and Pulley faces a maximum penalty of 15 years in prison on his firearm charge.

    Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Adam Gustafson of the Justice Department’s Environment and Natural Resources Division (ENRD) and Acting U.S. Attorney C. Shanelle Booker for the Middle District of Georgia made the announcement.

    The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Office of the Inspector General and detectives with the Seminole County, Georgia, Sheriff’s Office investigated the case. Detectives with the Bay County, Florda, Sheriff’s Office also provided invaluable assistance.

    Senior Trial Attorney Ethan Eddy and Trial Attorney Leigh Rendé of ENRD’s Environmental Crimes Section are prosecuting the case with assistance from Criminal Chief Leah McEwen of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Middle District of Georgia. Assistant U.S. Attorney Michael Morrill and Paralegal Kristi Cote for the Middle District of Georgia handled a parallel civil forfeiture proceeding to ensure that the dogs did not have to be returned to the defendants. The U.S. Attorney’s Offices for the Northern District of Florida and Middle District of Alabama also assisted with the dog rescue operation. 

    MIL Security OSI –

    February 28, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Budd, Scott, Kelly Introduce Strategic Ports Reporting Act

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Ted Budd (R-North Carolina)

    Washington, D.C. — Today, Senators Ted Budd (R-NC), Rick Scott (R-FL), and Mark Kelly (D-AZ) introduced the Strategic Ports Reporting Act, which requires the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Defense to monitor efforts by the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to build, buy, or own strategic ports around the world.

    Specifically, this bill requires the development of a map of foreign and domestic ports of importance to the United States for military, diplomatic, economic, or resource exploration purposes and to identify efforts by the PRC to build, buy, or otherwise control such ports.

    This bill would also require the Secretary of State and Secretary of Defense to conduct a study on activities and plans of the PRC as it relates to strategic ports to include an assessment of vulnerabilities of ports operated and controlled by the United States and a strategy to secure trusted investment and ownership of strategic ports.

    The House companion bill is led by Representatives Bill Huizenga (R-MI), Rob Wittman (R-VA), Jake Auchincloss (D-MA), and Johnny Olszewski (D-MD).

    Senator Budd said in a statement:

    “In January, the Senate Commerce Committee held a hearing on PRC influence on the Panama Canal and potential impacts to U.S. national security. This hearing highlighted China’s increasing malign activities around the world and efforts to control global trade. The United States must face this reality head on, and the first step is comprehensive monitoring of PRC activities at domestic and foreign ports that threaten our national interest.”

    Senator Scott said:

    “The Chinese Communist Party’s increasing influence over global trade routes and strategic infrastructure poses a direct threat to the United States’ national security and economic stability. From the Panama Canal to ports across the world, Communist China is working to grow its economic and military presence to threaten and undermine American interests. The United States must respond decisively and accordingly to eliminate any influence or access Communist China has to the critical infrastructure of the U.S. and its allies that may be used against us. The Strategic Ports Reporting Act is a crucial step to safeguarding critical ports and securing our supply chains, and protecting our national security.”

    Senator Kelly said:

    “China’s growing influence over the oceans can have serious consequences for our national security and economy. That’s why we need the State and Defense Departments to protect our strategic ports from China’s interference. This bipartisan bill will strengthen our global maritime leadership.”   

    Congressman Huizenga said:

    “The Chinese Communist Party continues to advance economic and military objectives that undermine the security of the United States. The expansionist policies and strategic investments being pursued by the Chinese Communist Party near the Panama Canal, across the Western Hemisphere, and around the globe are challenges that Republicans and Democrats must confront together in order to put American interests first. The Strategic Ports Reporting Act creates a bipartisan opportunity to not only evaluate these growing concerns but counter them as well.”

    Congressman Wittman said:

    “China’s Belt and Road Initiative is spreading Chinese money and influence around the world, while degrading our ability to operate in strategic ports necessary for commercial and military purposes. It is crucial for the Departments of State and Defense to identify ways in which the Chinese Communist Party is expanding its maritime reach while providing recommendations for how the United States can counter those efforts and secure access to essential ports and infrastructure. I’m proud to join my colleagues in this bipartisan effort and look forward to championing it over the finish line.”

    Congressman Auchincloss said:

    “Control over ports is a pathway to global power. For millennia, these linchpins of trade and military might have been vital strategic assets. The United States must not allow China the upper hand.”

    Congressman Olszewski said:

    “China’s growing control over global ports threatens our national security and economic stability here at home. The Strategic Ports Reporting Act will ensure the U.S. has the necessary tools to monitor and counter this Chinese influence, protecting supply chains and our global standing. I’m proud to join Congressman Huizenga in co-leading this bipartisan effort to safeguard our ports and boost our economy.”

    MIL OSI USA News –

    February 28, 2025
  • MIL-OSI United Nations: Haiti: Over one million displaced by gang violence

    Source: United Nations MIL OSI

    27 February 2025 Humanitarian Aid

    Ongoing gang violence in Haiti has displaced more than a million people, nearly a tenth of the population, or three times more than last year, the UN Humanitarian Coordinator in the country said on Thursday. 

    Every number presented “is a new record,” said Ulrika Johnson, speaking from neighbouring Dominican Republic to journalists at UN Headquarters in New York.

    “The suffering that this is causing is immense, and I would say it is really heartbreaking to see, to witness, to listen to victims of violence,” she added.

    An ‘unprecedented crisis’

    The “unprecedented crisis” in Haiti continues to unfold as funding for humanitarian operations globally dwindles following the recent decision by the United States to halt foreign aid disbursements.

    A Multinational Security Support Mission (MSS), authorized by the UN Security Council, is on the ground to assist the national police in combatting the gangs.  UN Secretary-General António Guterres recently proposed that the global body assume funding for structural and logistical support.

    Children suffer most

    Ms. Richardson said human rights violations have risen when compared to 2024. 

    Over 5,600 people were killed last year, according to the UN human rights office, OHCHR.   Sexual violence is “rampant” and UN children’s agency UNICEF reports “a staggering” 1,000 per cent increase in cases involving children between 2023 and 2024. 

    “The impact on women and children is enormous,” she said, noting that children comprise half of the displaced. 

    “They are really bearing the brunt of the crisis,” she continued.  “They’re also recruited by gangs. We’ve seen a 70 per cent increase in one year of how they coerce children into gangs.”

    Deportees and refugees

    Meanwhile, five million Haitians require food assistance, the number of children suffering from malnutrition and stunting has increased, and only a third of health institutions are operating.

    Haiti is also dealing with the impact of deportations. Last year, some 200,000 nationals were sent back to the country, and many had no home to go to. Haitians are also leaving their homeland, often at great risk. Reports indicate that nearly 400,000 fled last year.

    Despite the realities on the ground, and access limitations, humanitarian response continues, including in gang-controlled areas.  

    It is taking place even as the main airport in Port-au-Prince remains closed since November, affecting the movement of humanitarian goods and personnel both into the country and out from the capital city to the regions.

    “We’ve been able to set up a logistics hub in the north, and this has been very helpful, obviously, to be able to receive humanitarian goods and then trying to bring them into the capital,” Ms. Richardson said.

    US aid freeze

    In 2024, the humanitarian community launched a $600 million plan for Haiti, receiving just over 40 per cent of the funding. Around 60 per cent came from the United States.

    “Obviously, the US temporary freeze and the stop work order has an impact on us,” she underlined.

    This year’s plan will call for just over $900 million to cover assistance such as food, medicine, protection, healthcare and psychosocial support for rape victims.

    She expressed confidence that if the UN and partners can mobilize this funding, “we can do our absolute best, and more than that, in terms of the seamless delivery of humanitarian aid to the people that so desperately need this aid.”  

    MIL OSI United Nations News –

    February 28, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Security: Dominican national, deported six times previously, sentenced to over 15 years in prison for trafficking fentanyl and heroin

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    RICHMOND, Va. – A national of the Dominican Republic was sentenced today to 15 years and eight months in prison for possession with intent to distribute fentanyl and heroin and illegally reentering the United States after a felony conviction.

    According to court documents, on Jan. 18, 2024, a Trooper with the Virginia State Police (VSP) pulled over Gregorio Gustavo DeJesus Santos on I-85 in Mecklenburg County. During that traffic stop, a narcotics canine alerted to the odor of narcotics. VSP searched the car and found a hidden compartment under the passenger seat that extended into the back seat area. The compartment was empty. The Trooper released DeJesus Santos.

    Shortly after arriving in North Carolina, DeJesus Santos traveled back into Virginia, where law enforcement stopped the vehicle for a traffic infraction and, again, a narcotics canine alerted to the presence of narcotics in the vehicle. While searching the vehicle, law enforcement located two packages in the hidden compartment. One of the packages contained 200 grams of fentanyl and the other contained 293 grams of a mixture of fentanyl and heroin.

    DeJesus Santos acknowledged as part of his guilty plea that he obtained and redistributed at least three additional kilograms of fentanyl.

    DeJesus Santos had been found in the United States and removed on six previous occasions, beginning in 1996 and most recently on Oct. 18, 2022, after he had been convicted of a felony drug charge in federal court in the Southern District of New York and released from prison.

    Erik S. Siebert, U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia; Christopher Heck, Acting Special Agent in Charge of Immigration and Customs Enforcement Homeland Security Investigations (ICE HSI) Washington, D.C.; and Col. Matt Hanley, Superintendent of Virginia State Police, made the announcement after sentencing by U.S. District Judge David J. Novak.

    Assistant U.S. Attorneys Angela Mastandrea and Patrick J. McGorman prosecuted the case.

    A copy of this press release is located on the website of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Virginia. Related court documents and information are located on the website of the District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia or on PACER by searching for Case No. 3:24-cr-88.

    MIL Security OSI –

    February 28, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: Sunrun Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2024 Financial Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Cash Generation of $34 million in Q4 after safe harbor equipment purchases, third consecutive quarter of positive Cash Generation

    Paid down $132 million of recourse debt in Q4 with excess cash

    Cash Generation guidance of $200 million to $500 million in 2025

    Cash Generation guidance of $40 to $50 million in Q1

    Net Earning Assets increased to $6.8 billion, including $947 million of Total Cash

    Storage Capacity Installed of 392 Megawatt hours in Q4, exceeding high-end of guidance range and representing 78% year-over-year growth, as storage attachment rates reach 62%

    Solar Energy Capacity Installed of 242 Megawatts in Q4, within the guidance range, reaching 7.5 Gigawatts of Networked Solar Energy Capacity

    SAN FRANCISCO, Feb. 27, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Sunrun (Nasdaq: RUN), the nation’s leading provider of clean energy as a subscription service, today announced financial results for the fourth quarter and full year ended December 31, 2024.

    “We are growing, generating meaningful cash, increasing our book value of deployed systems, and paying down debt. We are poised to further improve our operating and financial results, and deliver a very strong 2025 with meaningful Cash Generation. Our actions to optimize our product mix, prioritize the highest value geographies and routes to market and an intense focus on cost as we grow have resulted in the highest Net Subscriber Values Sunrun has ever reported,” said Mary Powell, Sunrun’s Chief Executive Officer. “We are improving in every dimension we control – focusing on fast, effective execution, delivering strong financial and operating results, gaining share in a disciplined way, while building a long-term foundation of valuable grid resources.”

    “In the fourth quarter, we again set new margin records and delivered the third consecutive quarter of Cash Generation. We continue to execute well in the capital markets, raising more than $4 billion in asset-level debt and tax equity financing during 2024, and more than $800 million in non-recourse debt financing year-to-date. We have extended our runway of tax equity commitments and term sheets, including $1.3 billion added year-to-date,” said Danny Abajian, Sunrun’s Chief Financial Officer. “We have a strong balance sheet with no near-term corporate debt maturities and have paid down recourse parent debt by $186 million since March, including a $132 million paydown using excess cash in Q4. As we increase our Cash Generation, we will continue to further pay down parent recourse debt and are committed to a capital allocation strategy beyond this initial de-leveraging period that drives significant shareholder value.”

    Fourth Quarter Updates

    • Storage Attachment Rates Reach 62%: Customer Additions with storage grew more than 50% during the quarter compared to the prior-year period. Storage attachment rates on installations reached 62% in Q4, up from 45% in the prior-year period, with 392 Megawatt hours installed during the quarter. Sunrun has installed more than 156,000 solar and storage systems, representing over 2.5 Gigawatt hours of stored energy capacity.
    • Continued Strong Capital Markets Execution: In January 2025, Sunrun priced a $629 million securitization of residential solar and battery systems. The securitization is Sunrun’s thirteenth securitization since 2015 and first issuance in 2025. The oversubscribed transaction was structured with three separate classes of A rated notes, only two of which were publicly offered. The weighted average spread of the notes was 197 basis points, which was an improvement of approximately 38 basis points from our prior securitization in September. Similar to prior transactions, Sunrun raised additional capital in a subordinated non-recourse financing, which increased the cumulative advance rate to above 80% as measured against the initial Contracted Subscriber Value of the portfolio.
    • Paying Down Recourse Debt: We continue to pay down parent recourse debt. During the fourth quarter, we repurchased $125.5 million in principal of our 2026 Convertible Notes. As of December 31, 2024 we had only $7.7 million outstanding of these notes, which we may repurchase in 2025. Since March 31, 2024 we have paid down recourse debt by $186 million, by repurchasing our 2026 Convertible Notes and reducing borrowings under our recourse Working Capital Facility. We have also increased our Total Cash balance by $164 million and grown Net Earning Assets by $1.5 billion. We expect to further pay down our recourse debt in 2025 by $100 million or more. Aside from the $7.7 million outstanding of our 2026 Convertible Notes, we have no recourse debt maturities until March 2027. Over time we will explore further capital allocation options to maximize shareholder value, based on market conditions and our long-term outlook.
    • Improving Grid Stability with Virtual Power Plants: During 2024, Sunrun’s virtual power plants (VPPs) successfully supported power grids across the country with a combined instantaneous peak of nearly 80 megawatts—a capacity greater than many traditional fossil-fuel power plants. These innovative programs leveraged Sunrun’s fleet of residential solar and battery systems—the largest in America—empowering customers to generate, store, and share their own solar energy. In 2024, more than 20,000 Sunrun customers participated in 16 virtual power plant programs across nine states and territories. From California and Texas to Puerto Rico and New England, the customers’ batteries supplied on-demand, stored solar energy to augment power resources during hundreds of critical energy events.

    Key Operating Metrics

    In the fourth quarter of 2024, Customer Additions were 32,932 including 30,709 Subscriber Additions. As of December 31, 2024, Sunrun had 1,048,842 Customers, including 889,186 Subscribers. Customers grew 12% in the fourth quarter of 2024 compared to the fourth quarter of 2023.

    Annual Recurring Revenue from Subscribers was approximately $1.6 billion as of December 31, 2024. The Average Contract Life Remaining of Subscribers was 17.6 years as of December 31, 2024.

    Subscriber Value was $55,811 in the fourth quarter of 2024, a 11% increase compared to the fourth quarter of 2023. Creation Cost was $36,634 in the fourth quarter of 2024, a 1% decrease compared to the fourth quarter of 2023.

    Net Subscriber Value was $19,177 in the fourth quarter of 2024. Total Value Generated was $589 million in the fourth quarter of 2024. On a pro-forma basis assuming a 7.3% discount rate, consistent with capital costs observed in the quarter, Subscriber Value was $50,998 and Net Subscriber Value was $14,364 in the fourth quarter of 2024.

    Gross Earning Assets as of December 31, 2024, were $17.8 billion. Net Earning Assets were $6.8 billion, which included $947 million in Total Cash, as of December 31, 2024.

    Cash Generation was $34.2 million in the fourth quarter of 2024, the third consecutive quarter of positive Cash Generation.

    Storage Capacity Installed was 392.0 Megawatt hours in the fourth quarter of 2024, a 78% increase compared to the fourth quarter of 2023.

    Solar Energy Capacity Installed was 242.4 Megawatts in the fourth quarter of 2024, a 7% increase compared to the fourth quarter of 2023. Included in this figure is 232.0 Megawatts of Solar Energy Capacity Installed for Subscribers in the fourth quarter of 2024, an 11% increase compared to the fourth quarter of 2023.

    Networked Solar Energy Capacity was 7,531 Megawatts as of December 31, 2024. Included in this figure is 6,436 Megawatts of Networked Solar Energy Capacity for Subscribers as of December 31, 2024.

    Networked Storage Capacity was 2.5 Gigawatt hours as of December 31, 2024.

    The solar energy systems we deployed in Q4 are expected to offset the emission of 4.8 million metric tons of CO2 over the next thirty years. Over the last twelve months ended December 31, 2024, Sunrun’s systems are estimated to have offset 4.0 million metric tons of CO2.

    Outlook

    Cash Generation is expected to be in a range of $40 million to $50 million in the first quarter of 2025.

    For the full-year 2025, Cash Generation is expected to be in a range of $200 million to $500 million.

    Storage Capacity Installed is expected to be in a range of 265 to 275 Megawatt hours in the first quarter of 2025, representing approximately 30% growth year over year at the midpoint.

    Solar Energy Capacity Installed is expected to be in a range of 170 to 180 Megawatts in the first quarter of 2025, representing approximately flat year over year growth at the midpoint.

    For the full-year 2025, the Company expects robust growth in Storage Capacity Installed year over year, and Solar Energy Capacity Installed is expected to be approximately flat year over year.

    Fourth Quarter 2024 GAAP Results

    Total revenue was $518.5 million in the fourth quarter of 2024, up $1.9 million, or 0%, from the fourth quarter of 2023. Customer agreements and incentives revenue was $388.6 million, an increase of $67.0 million, or 21%, compared to the fourth quarter of 2023. Solar energy systems and product sales revenue was $129.9 million, a decrease of $65.1 million, or 33%, compared to the fourth quarter of 2023. The increasing mix of Subscribers results in less upfront revenue recognition, as revenue is recognized over the life of the Customer Agreement, which is typically 20 or 25 years.

    Total cost of revenue was $421.0 million, a decrease of 13% year-over-year. Total operating expenses were $652.6 million, a decrease of 9% year-over-year, on a pro-forma basis to exclude a non-cash goodwill impairment, which was incurred in the fourth quarter of 2024.

    Net loss attributable to common stockholders was $2,813.7 million, or $12.51 per basic and diluted share for the fourth quarter of 2024. Pro forma to exclude non-cash impairment charges, results in non-GAAP net income of $360.9 million or $1.41 per diluted share for the fourth quarter of 2024.

    Full Year 2024 GAAP Results

    Total revenue was $2,037.7 million in the full year 2024, down $222.1 million, or 10%, from the full year 2023. Customer agreements and incentives revenue was $1,505.2 million, an increase of $318.5 million, or 27%, compared to the full year 2023. Solar energy systems and product sales revenue was $532.5 million, a decrease of $540.6 million, or 50%, compared to the full year 2023.

    Total cost of revenue was $1,709.2 million, a decrease of 18% year-over-year. Total operating expenses were $2,610.8 million, a decrease of 15% year-over year, on a pro-forma basis to exclude non-cash goodwill impairment, which was incurred in both the full year 2023 and full year 2024.

    During the year, Sunrun recorded a non-cash goodwill impairment charge of approximately $3.1 billion. Due to the decline in our stock price, we wrote down our goodwill balance of $3.1 billion in its entirety during the fourth quarter of 2024. The goodwill primarily arose following the stock-for-stock acquisition of Vivint Solar in October 2020, with the majority arising from and determined based on the market capitalizations at the time of the acquisition. The Company recorded a non-cash goodwill impairment charge of $3.1 billion, or $14.05 per basic share, in our Consolidated Statement of Operations for the full year 2024, which was reflected in the Company’s fourth quarter results.

    Net loss attributable to common stockholders was $2,846.2 million, or $12.81 per basic and diluted share for the full year 2024. Pro-forma to exclude non-cash impairment charges, results in non-GAAP net income of $333.7 million or $1.33 per diluted share for the full-year 2024.

    Financing Activities

    As of February 27, 2025, closed transactions and executed term sheets provide us with expected tax equity to fund over 500 Megawatts of Solar Energy Capacity Installed for Subscribers beyond what was deployed through December 31, 2024. Sunrun also has $680 million in unused commitments available in its non-recourse senior revolving warehouse loan after the January securitization, to fund approximately 230 megawatts of projects for Subscribers.

    Conference Call Information

    Sunrun is hosting a conference call for analysts and investors to discuss its fourth quarter and full year 2024 results and business outlook at 1:30 p.m. Pacific Time today, February 27, 2025. A live audio webcast of the conference call along with supplemental financial information will be accessible via the “Investor Relations” section of Sunrun’s website at https://investors.sunrun.com. The conference call can also be accessed live over the phone by dialing (877) 407-5989 (toll free) or (201) 689-8434 (toll). An audio replay will be available following the call on the Sunrun Investor Relations website for approximately one month.

    About Sunrun

    Sunrun Inc. (Nasdaq: RUN) revolutionized the solar industry in 2007 by removing financial barriers and democratizing access to locally-generated, renewable energy. Today, Sunrun is the nation’s leading provider of clean energy as a subscription service, offering residential solar and storage with no upfront costs. Sunrun’s innovative products and solutions can connect homes to the cleanest energy on earth, providing them with energy security, predictability, and peace of mind. Sunrun also manages energy services that benefit communities, utilities, and the electric grid while enhancing customer value. Discover more at www.sunrun.com

    Non-GAAP Information

    This press release includes references to certain non-GAAP financial measures, such as non-GAAP net (loss) income and non-GAAP net (loss) income per share. We believe that these non-GAAP financial measures, when reviewed in conjunction with GAAP financial measures, can provide meaningful supplemental information for investors regarding the performance of our business and facilitate a meaningful evaluation of current period performance on a comparable basis with prior periods. Our management uses these non-GAAP financial measures in order to have comparable financial results to analyze changes in our underlying business from quarter to quarter. These non-GAAP financial measures should be considered as a supplement to, and not as a substitute for or superior to the GAAP financial measures presented in this press release and our financial statements and other publicly filed reports. Non-GAAP measures as presented herein may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies.

    Non-GAAP net (loss) income is defined as GAAP net (loss) income adjusted by the non-cash goodwill impairment charge, non-cash adjustment to equity investments, and the debt discount amortization. Management believes the exclusion of this non-cash and non-recurring item provides useful supplemental information to investors and facilitates the analysis of its operating results and comparison of operating results across reporting periods.

    Forward Looking Statements

    This communication contains forward-looking statements related to Sunrun (the “Company”) within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements related to: the Company’s financial and operating guidance and expectations; the Company’s business plan, trajectory, expectations, market leadership, competitive advantages, operational and financial results and metrics (and the assumptions related to the calculation of such metrics); the Company’s momentum in its business strategies including expectations regarding market share, total addressable market, growth in certain geographies, customer value proposition, market penetration, growth of certain divisions, financing activities, financing capacity, product mix, and ability to manage cash flow and liquidity; the growth of the solar industry; the Company’s financing activities and expectations to refinance, amend, and/or extend any financing facilities; trends or potential trends within the solar industry, our business, customer base, and market; the Company’s ability to derive value from the anticipated benefits of partnerships, new technologies, and pilot programs, including contract renewal and repowering programs; anticipated demand, market acceptance, and market adoption of the Company’s offerings, including new products, services, and technologies; the Company’s strategy to be a margin-focused, multi-product, customer-oriented company; the ability to increase margins based on a shift in product focus; expectations regarding the growth of home electrification, electric vehicles, virtual power plants, and distributed energy resources; the Company’s ability to manage suppliers, inventory, and workforce; supply chains and regulatory impacts affecting supply chains; the Company’s leadership team and talent development; the legislative and regulatory environment of the solar industry and the potential impacts of proposed, amended, and newly adopted legislation and regulation on the solar industry and our business; the ongoing expectations regarding the Company’s storage and energy services businesses and anticipated emissions reductions due to utilization of the Company’s solar energy systems; and factors outside of the Company’s control such as macroeconomic trends, bank failures, public health emergencies, natural disasters, acts of war, terrorism, geopolitical conflict, or armed conflict / invasion, and the impacts of climate change. These statements are not guarantees of future performance; they reflect the Company’s current views with respect to future events and are based on assumptions and estimates and are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from expectations or results projected or implied by forward-looking statements. The risks and uncertainties that could cause the Company’s results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements include: the Company’s continued ability to manage costs and compete effectively; the availability of additional financing on acceptable terms; worldwide economic conditions, including slow or negative growth rates and inflation; volatile or rising interest rates; changes in policies and regulations, including net metering, interconnection limits, and fixed fees, or caps and licensing restrictions and the impact of these changes on the solar industry and our business; the Company’s ability to attract and retain the Company’s business partners; supply chain risks and associated costs; realizing the anticipated benefits of past or future investments, partnerships, strategic transactions, or acquisitions, and integrating those acquisitions; the Company’s leadership team and ability to attract and retain key employees; changes in the retail prices of traditional utility generated electricity; the availability of rebates, tax credits and other incentives; the availability of solar panels, batteries, and other components and raw materials; the Company’s business plan and the Company’s ability to effectively manage the Company’s growth and labor constraints; the Company’s ability to meet the covenants in the Company’s investment funds and debt facilities; factors impacting the home electrification and solar industry generally, and such other risks and uncertainties identified in the reports that we file with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission from time to time. All forward-looking statements used herein are based on information available to us as of the date hereof, and we assume no obligation to update publicly these forward-looking statements for any reason, except as required by law.

    Citations to industry and market statistics used herein may be found in our Investor Presentation, available via the “Investor Relations” section of Sunrun’s website at https://investors.sunrun.com.

    Consolidated Balance Sheets
    (In Thousands)
        As of December 31,
          2024     2023
    Assets        
    Current assets:        
    Cash   $ 574,956   $ 678,821
    Restricted cash     372,312     308,869
    Accounts receivable, net     170,706     172,001
    Inventories     402,083     459,746
    Prepaid expenses and other current assets     202,579     262,822
    Total current assets     1,722,636     1,882,259
    Restricted cash     148     148
    Solar energy systems, net     15,032,115     13,028,871
    Property and equipment, net     121,239     149,139
    Goodwill     —     3,122,168
    Other assets     3,021,746     2,267,652
    Total assets   $ 19,897,884   $ 20,450,237
    Liabilities and total equity        
    Current liabilities:        
    Accounts payable   $ 354,214   $ 230,723
    Distributions payable to noncontrolling interests and redeemable noncontrolling interests     41,464     35,180
    Accrued expenses and other liabilities     543,752     499,225
    Deferred revenue, current portion     129,442     128,600
    Deferred grants, current portion     7,900     8,199
    Finance lease obligations, current portion     26,045     22,053
    Non-recourse debt, current portion     231,665     547,870
    Pass-through financing obligation, current portion     —     16,309
    Total current liabilities     1,334,482     1,488,159
    Deferred revenue, net of current portion     1,208,905     1,067,461
    Deferred grants, net of current portion     196,535     195,724
    Finance lease obligations, net of current portion     66,139     68,753
    Line of credit     384,226     539,502
    Non-recourse debt, net of current portion     11,806,181     9,191,689
    Convertible senior notes     479,420     392,867
    Pass-through financing obligation, net of current portion     —     278,333
    Other liabilities     119,846     190,866
    Deferred tax liabilities     137,940     122,870
    Total liabilities     15,733,674     13,536,224
    Redeemable noncontrolling interests     624,159     676,177
    Total stockholders’ equity     2,554,207     5,230,228
    Noncontrolling interests     985,844     1,007,608
    Total equity     3,540,051     6,237,836
    Total liabilities, redeemable noncontrolling interests and total equity   $ 19,897,884   $ 20,450,237
    Consolidated Statements of Operations
    (In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)

        Three Months Ended
    December 31,
      Year Ended
    December 31,
          2024       2023       2024       2023  
    Revenue:                
    Customer agreements and incentives   $ 388,574     $ 321,555     $ 1,505,227     $ 1,186,706  
    Solar energy systems and product sales     129,918       195,035       532,492       1,073,107  
    Total revenue     518,492       516,590       2,037,719       2,259,813  
    Operating expenses:                
    Cost of customer agreements and incentives     292,632       287,780       1,169,213       1,077,114  
    Cost of solar energy systems and product sales     128,361       194,808       539,952       1,019,638  
    Sales and marketing     150,751       166,760       617,162       740,821  
    Research and development     8,794       7,663       39,304       21,816  
    General and administrative     72,045       57,110       245,127       221,067  
    Goodwill Impairment     3,122,168       —       3,122,168       1,158,000  
    Total operating expenses     3,774,751       714,121       5,732,926       4,238,456  
    Loss from operations     (3,256,259 )     (197,531 )     (3,695,207 )     (1,978,643 )
    Interest expense, net     (233,385 )     (181,826 )     (848,366 )     (652,989 )
    Other income (expense), net     89,829       (157,644 )     161,539       (63,900 )
    Loss before income taxes     (3,399,815 )     (537,001 )     (4,382,034 )     (2,695,532 )
    Income tax benefit     136       (1,595 )     (26,817 )     (12,691 )
    Net loss     (3,399,951 )     (535,406 )     (4,355,217 )     (2,682,841 )
    Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests and redeemable noncontrolling interests     (586,294 )     (185,282 )     (1,509,050 )     (1,078,344 )
    Net loss attributable to common stockholders   $ (2,813,657 )   $ (350,124 )   $ (2,846,167 )   $ (1,604,497 )
    Net loss per share attributable to common stockholders                
    Basic   $ (12.51 )   $ (1.60 )   $ (12.81 )   $ (7.41 )
    Diluted   $ (12.51 )   $ (1.60 )   $ (12.81 )   $ (7.41 )
    Weighted average shares used to compute net loss per share attributable to common stockholders                
    Basic     224,896       218,461       222,215       216,642  
    Diluted     224,896       218,461       222,215       216,642  
    Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
    (In Thousands)

        Three Months Ended December 31,   Year Ended December 31,
          2024       2023       2024       2023  
    Operating activities:                
    Net loss   $ (3,399,951 )   $ (535,406 )   $ (4,355,217 )   $ (2,682,841 )
    Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:                
    Depreciation and amortization, net of amortization of deferred grants     162,343       143,024       620,876       531,669  
    Goodwill impairment     3,122,168       —       3,122,168       1,158,000  
    Deferred income taxes     136       (1,623 )     (26,817 )     (12,716 )
    Stock-based compensation expense     28,869       27,555       112,825       111,781  
    Interest on pass-through financing obligations     —       4,862       8,837       19,504  
    Reduction in pass-through financing obligations     —       (9,820 )     (20,787 )     (40,352 )
    Unrealized (gain) loss on derivatives     (122,319 )     108,226       (120,008 )     28,105  
    Other noncash items     105,220       118,956       210,479       261,390  
    Changes in operating assets and liabilities:                
    Accounts receivable     5,741       5,762       (14,974 )     15,748  
    Inventories     (59,735 )     202,055       57,663       324,158  
    Prepaid expenses and other current assets     (301,380 )     (142,438 )     (771,997 )     (476,628 )
    Accounts payable     141,070       (52,514 )     177,449       (108,785 )
    Accrued expenses and other liabilities     4,182       (31,986 )     80,588       (56,473 )
    Deferred revenue     55,297       47,340       152,762       106,700  
    Net cash used in operating activities     (258,359 )     (116,007 )     (766,153 )     (820,740 )
    Investing activities:                
    Payments for the costs of solar energy systems     (791,785 )     (651,462 )     (2,699,452 )     (2,587,183 )
    Purchase of equity investment     —       (5,000 )     —       (5,000 )
    Purchases of property and equipment, net     (627 )     (4,662 )     (1,572 )     (20,960 )
    Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities     (792,412 )     (661,124 )     (2,701,024 )     (2,613,143 )
    Financing activities:                
    Proceeds from state tax credits, net of recapture     —       —       5,203       4,033  
    Proceeds from trade receivable financing     124,261       41,225       124,261       41,225  
    Repayment of trade receivable financing     —       (41,225 )     —       (41,225 )
    Proceeds from line of credit     48,700       473,277       354,256       1,124,675  
    Repayment of line of credit     (56,998 )     (451,023 )     (509,532 )     (1,090,331 )
    Proceeds from issuance of convertible senior notes, net of capped call transaction     —       —       444,822       —  
    Repurchase of convertible senior notes     (117,235 )     (1,545 )     (346,581 )     (1,545 )
    Proceeds from issuance of non-recourse debt     644,950       556,100       4,009,906       3,745,580  
    Repayment of non-recourse debt     (102,748 )     (175,728 )     (1,794,962 )     (1,575,527 )
    Payment of debt fees     (128 )     (412 )     (93,875 )     (47,342 )
    Proceeds from pass-through financing and other obligations, net     —       2,100       4,795       8,812  
    Repayment of pass-through financing obligation     —       —       (240,288 )     —  
    Payment of finance lease obligations     (6,605 )     (6,484 )     (27,240 )     (23,279 )
    Contributions received from noncontrolling interests and redeemable noncontrolling interests     521,480       459,858       1,811,966       1,572,399  
    Distributions paid to noncontrolling interests and redeemable noncontrolling interests     (70,269 )     (51,578 )     (308,657 )     (225,114 )
    Acquisition of noncontrolling interest     (4,761 )     —       (26,195 )     (46,274 )
    Proceeds from transfer of investment tax credits     148,586       6,980       705,697       6,980  
    Payments to redeemable noncontrolling interests and noncontrolling interests of investment tax credits     (148,586 )     (6,980 )     (705,697 )     (6,980 )
    Net proceeds related to stock-based award activities     6,923       8,459       18,876       22,611  
    Net cash provided by financing activities     987,570       813,024       3,426,755       3,468,698  
    Net change in cash and restricted cash     (63,201 )     35,893       (40,422 )     34,815  
    Cash and restricted cash, beginning of period     1,010,617       951,945       987,838       953,023  
    Cash and restricted cash, end of period   $ 947,416     $ 987,838     $ 947,416     $ 987,838  
    Reconciliation between GAAP and Non-GAAP diluted (loss) income per share:

        Three Months Ended
    December 31, 2024
      Year Ended
    December 31, 2024
        Net (Loss)
    Income
      Diluted EPS   Net (Loss)
    Income
      Diluted EPS
    GAAP diluted loss per share   $ (2,813,657 )   $ (12.51 )   $ (2,846,167 )   $ (12.81 )
    Debt Discount Amortization     1,131       0.01       6,438       0.03  
    Non-cash impairment charges (2)     3,173,450       14.11       3,173,450       14.28  
    Non-GAAP diluted income per share (1)   $ 360,924     $ 1.41     $ 333,721     $ 1.33  
                     
    GAAP weighted average shares for diluted EPS     224,896           222,215      
    Non-GAAP weighted average shares for diluted EPS     256,614           250,622      


    (1)
       Non-GAAP diluted income per share excludes the effects of the pro forma adjustment detailed above. Non- GAAP diluted income per share is adjusted to exclude this item, as it is not used by management to evaluate the performance of the business.
    (2)   Excluding this item of non-recurring, infrequent or unusual nature and its impact on the comparability of our results for the period to prior periods and future expected trends.

    Key Operating and Financial Metrics

    The following operating metrics are used by management to evaluate the performance of the business. Management believes these metrics, when taken together with other information contained in our filings with the SEC and within this press release, provide investors with helpful information to determine the economic performance of the business activities in a period that would otherwise not be observable from historic GAAP measures. Management believes that it is helpful to investors to evaluate the present value of cash flows expected from subscribers over the full expected relationship with such subscribers (“Subscriber Value”, more fully defined in the definitions appendix below) in comparison to the costs associated with adding these customers, regardless of whether or not the costs are expensed or capitalized in the period (“Creation Cost”, more fully defined in the definitions appendix below). The Company also believes that Subscriber Value, Creation Costs, and Total Value Generated are useful metrics for investors because they present an unlevered view of all of the costs associated with new customers in a period compared to the expected future cash flows from these customers over a 30-year period, based on contracted pricing terms with its customers, which is not observable in any current or historic GAAP-derived metric. Management believes it is useful for investors to also evaluate the future expected cash flows from all customers that have been deployed through the respective measurement date, less estimated costs to maintain such systems and estimated distributions to tax equity partners in consolidated joint venture partnership flip structures, and distributions to project equity investors (“Gross Earning Assets”, more fully defined in the definitions appendix below). The Company also believes Gross Earning Assets is useful for management and investors because it represents the remaining future expected cash flows from existing customers, which is not a current or historic GAAP-derived measure.

    Various assumptions are made when calculating these metrics. Both Subscriber Value and Gross Earning Assets utilize a 6% rate to discount future cash flows to the present period. Furthermore, these metrics assume that customers renew after the initial contract period at a rate equal to 90% of the rate in effect at the end of the initial contract term. For Customer Agreements with 25-year initial contract terms, a 5-year renewal period is assumed. For a 20-year initial contract term, a 10-year renewal period is assumed. In all instances, we assume a 30-year customer relationship, although the customer may renew for additional years, or purchase the system. Estimated cost of servicing assets has been deducted and is estimated based on the service agreements underlying each fund.

    In-period volume metrics: Three Months Ended
    December 31, 2024
     
    Customer Additions   32,932  
    Subscriber Additions (included within Customer Additions)   30,709  
    Solar Energy Capacity Installed (in Megawatts)   242.4  
    Solar Energy Capacity Installed for Subscribers (in Megawatts)   232.0  
    Storage Capacity Installed (in Megawatt hours)   392.0  
         
    In-period value creation metrics: Three Months Ended
    December 31, 2024
     
    Subscriber Value Contracted Period $52,035  
    Subscriber Value Renewal Period $3,776  
    Subscriber Value $55,811  
    Creation Cost $36,634  
    Net Subscriber Value $19,177  
    Total Value Generated (in millions) $588.9  
         
    In-period environmental impact metrics: Three Months Ended
    December 31, 2024
     
    Positive Environmental Impact from Customers (over trailing twelve months, in millions of metric tons of CO2 avoidance)   4.0  
    Positive Expected Lifetime Environmental Impact from Customer Additions (in millions of metric tons of CO2 avoidance)   4.8  
         
    Period-end metrics: December 31, 2024  
    Customers   1,048,842  
    Subscribers (subset of Customers)   889,186  
    Households Served in Low-Income Multifamily Properties   21,129  
    Networked Solar Energy Capacity (in Megawatts)   7,531  
    Networked Solar Energy Capacity for Subscribers (in Megawatts)   6,436  
    Networked Storage Capacity (in Megawatt hours)   2,525  
    Annual Recurring Revenue (in millions) $1,644  
    Average Contract Life Remaining (in years)   17.6  
    Gross Earning Assets Contracted Period (in millions) $13,791  
    Gross Earning Assets Renewal Period (in millions) $4,043  
    Gross Earning Assets (in millions) $17,834  
    Net Earning Assets (in millions) $6,766  
           

    Figures presented above may not sum due to rounding. For adjustments related to Subscriber Value and Creation Cost, please see the supplemental Creation Cost and Net Subscriber Value calculation memo for each applicable period, which is available on investors.sunrun.com.

    Definitions

    Deployments represent solar or storage systems, whether sold directly to customers or subject to executed Customer Agreements (i) for which we have confirmation that the systems are installed, subject to final inspection, or (ii) in the case of certain system installations by our partners, for which we have accrued at least 80% of the expected project cost (inclusive of acquisitions of installed systems).

    Customer Agreements refer to, collectively, solar or storage power purchase agreements and leases.

    Subscriber Additions represent the number of Deployments in the period that are subject to executed Customer Agreements.

    Customer Additions represent the number of Deployments in the period.

    Solar Energy Capacity Installed represents the aggregate megawatt production capacity of our solar energy systems that were recognized as Deployments in the period.

    Solar Energy Capacity Installed for Subscribers represents the aggregate megawatt production capacity of our solar energy systems that were recognized as Deployments in the period that are subject to executed Customer Agreements.

    Storage Capacity Installed represents the aggregate megawatt hour capacity of storage systems that were recognized as Deployments in the period.

    Creation Cost represents the sum of certain operating expenses and capital expenditures incurred divided by applicable Customer Additions and Subscriber Additions in the period. Creation Cost is comprised of (i) installation costs, which includes the increase in gross solar energy system assets and the cost of customer agreement revenue, excluding depreciation expense of fixed solar assets, and operating and maintenance expenses associated with existing Subscribers, plus (ii) sales and marketing costs, including increases to the gross capitalized costs to obtain contracts, net of the amortization expense of the costs to obtain contracts, plus (iii) general and administrative costs, and less (iv) the gross profit derived from selling systems to customers under sale agreements and Sunrun’s product distribution and lead generation businesses. Creation Cost excludes stock based compensation, amortization of intangibles, and research and development expenses, along with other items the company deems to be non-recurring or extraordinary in nature. The gross margin derived from solar energy systems and product sales is included as an offset to Creation Cost since these sales are ancillary to the overall business model and lowers our overall cost of business. The sales, marketing, general and administrative costs in Creation Costs is inclusive of sales, marketing, general and administrative activities related to the entire business, including solar energy system and product sales. As such, by including the gross margin on solar energy system and product sales as a contra cost, the value of all activities of the Company’s segment are represented in the Net Subscriber Value.

    Subscriber Value represents the per subscriber value of upfront and future cash flows (discounted at 6%) from Subscriber Additions in the period, including expected payments from customers as set forth in Customer Agreements, net proceeds from tax equity finance partners, payments from utility incentive and state rebate programs, contracted net grid service program cash flows, projected future cash flows from solar energy renewable energy credit sales, less estimated operating and maintenance costs to service the systems and replace equipment, consistent with estimates by independent engineers, over the initial term of the Customer Agreements and estimated renewal period. For Customer Agreements with 25 year initial contract terms, a 5 year renewal period is assumed. For a 20 year initial contract term, a 10 year renewal period is assumed. In all instances, we assume a 30-year customer relationship, although the customer may renew for additional years, or purchase the system.

    Net Subscriber Value represents Subscriber Value less Creation Cost.

    Total Value Generated represents Net Subscriber Value multiplied by Subscriber Additions.

    Customers represent the cumulative number of Deployments, from the company’s inception through the measurement date.

    Subscribers represent the cumulative number of Customer Agreements for systems that have been recognized as Deployments through the measurement date.

    Networked Solar Energy Capacity represents the aggregate megawatt production capacity of our solar energy systems that have been recognized as Deployments, from the company’s inception through the measurement date.

    Networked Solar Energy Capacity for Subscribers represents the aggregate megawatt production capacity of our solar energy systems that have been recognized as Deployments, from the company’s inception through the measurement date, that have been subject to executed Customer Agreements.

    Networked Storage Capacity represents the aggregate megawatt hour capacity of our storage systems that have been recognized as Deployments, from the company’s inception through the measurement date.

    Gross Earning Assets is calculated as Gross Earning Assets Contracted Period plus Gross Earning Assets Renewal Period.

    Gross Earning Assets Contracted Period represents the present value of the remaining net cash flows (discounted at 6%) during the initial term of our Customer Agreements as of the measurement date. It is calculated as the present value of cash flows (discounted at 6%) that we would receive from Subscribers in future periods as set forth in Customer Agreements, after deducting expected operating and maintenance costs, equipment replacements costs, distributions to tax equity partners in consolidated joint venture partnership flip structures, and distributions to project equity investors. We include cash flows we expect to receive in future periods from tax equity partners, government incentive and rebate programs, contracted sales of solar renewable energy credits, and awarded net cash flows from grid service programs with utilities or grid operators.

    Gross Earning Assets Renewal Period is the forecasted net present value we would receive upon or following the expiration of the initial Customer Agreement term but before the 30th anniversary of the system’s activation (either in the form of cash payments during any applicable renewal period or a system purchase at the end of the initial term), for Subscribers as of the measurement date. We calculate the Gross Earning Assets Renewal Period amount at the expiration of the initial contract term assuming either a system purchase or a renewal, forecasting only a 30-year customer relationship (although the customer may renew for additional years, or purchase the system), at a contract rate equal to 90% of the customer’s contractual rate in effect at the end of the initial contract term. After the initial contract term, our Customer Agreements typically automatically renew on an annual basis and the rate is initially set at up to a 10% discount to then-prevailing utility power prices.

    Net Earning Assets represents Gross Earning Assets, plus total cash, less adjusted debt and less pass-through financing obligations, as of the same measurement date. Debt is adjusted to exclude a pro-rata share of non-recourse debt associated with funds with project equity structures along with debt associated with the company’s ITC safe harboring facility. Because estimated cash distributions to our project equity partners are deducted from Gross Earning Assets, a proportional share of the corresponding project level non-recourse debt is deducted from Net Earning Assets, as such debt would be serviced from cash flows already excluded from Gross Earning Assets.

    Cash Generation is calculated using the change in our unrestricted cash balance from our consolidated balance sheet, less net proceeds (or plus net repayments) from all recourse debt (inclusive of convertible debt), and less any primary equity issuances or net proceeds derived from employee stock award activity (or plus any stock buybacks or dividends paid to common stockholders) as presented on the Company’s consolidated statement of cash flows. The Company expects to continue to raise tax equity and asset-level non-recourse debt to fund growth, and as such, these sources of cash are included in the definition of Cash Generation. Cash Generation also excludes long-term asset or business divestitures and equity investments in external non-consolidated businesses (or less dividends or distributions received in connection with such equity investments). Restricted cash in a reserve account with a balance equal to the amount outstanding of 2026 convertible notes is considered unrestricted cash for the purposes of calculating Cash Generation.

    Annual Recurring Revenue represents revenue arising from Customer Agreements over the following twelve months for Subscribers that have met initial revenue recognition criteria as of the measurement date.

    Average Contract Life Remaining represents the average number of years remaining in the initial term of Customer Agreements for Subscribers that have met revenue recognition criteria as of the measurement date.

    Households Served in Low-Income Multifamily Properties represent the number of individual rental units served in low-income multi-family properties from shared solar energy systems deployed by Sunrun. Households are counted when the solar energy system has interconnected with the grid, which may differ from Deployment recognition criteria.

    Positive Environmental Impact from Customers represents the estimated reduction in carbon emissions as a result of energy produced from our Networked Solar Energy Capacity over the trailing twelve months. The figure is presented in millions of metric tons of avoided carbon emissions and is calculated using the Environmental Protection Agency’s AVERT tool. The figure is calculated using the most recent published tool from the EPA, using the current-year avoided emission factor for distributed resources on a state by state basis. The environmental impact is estimated based on the system, regardless of whether or not Sunrun continues to own the system or any associated renewable energy credits.

    Positive Expected Lifetime Environmental Impact from Customer Additions represents the estimated reduction in carbon emissions over thirty years as a result of energy produced from solar energy systems that were recognized as Deployments in the period. The figure is presented in millions of metric tons of avoided carbon emissions and is calculated using the Environmental Protection Agency’s AVERT tool. The figure is calculated using the most recent published tool from the EPA, using the current-year avoided emission factor for distributed resources on a state by state basis, leveraging our estimated production figures for such systems, which degrade over time, and is extrapolated for 30 years. The environmental impact is estimated based on the system, regardless of whether or not Sunrun continues to own the system or any associated renewable energy credits.

    Total Cash represents the total of the restricted cash balance and unrestricted cash balance from our consolidated balance sheet.

    Investor & Analyst Contact:

    Patrick Jobin
    SVP, Deputy CFO & Investor Relations Officer
    investors@sunrun.com

    Media Contact:

    Wyatt Semanek
    Director, Corporate Communications
    press@sunrun.com

    The MIL Network –

    February 28, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: dLocal Reports 2024 Fourth Quarter Financial Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Full Year 2024 results
    US$25.6 billion Total Payment Volume, up 45% year-over-year
    Revenue of US$746 million, up 15% year-over-year
    113% Net Revenue Retention Rate
    Gross Profit of US$295 million, up 6% year-over-year
    Adjusted EBITDA of US$189 million, down 7% year-over-year

    Fourth Quarter 2024
    US$7.7 billion Total Payment Volume, up 51% year-over-year and 18% quarter-over-quarter
    Revenue of US$204 million, up 9% year-over-year and 10% quarter-over-quarter
    106% Net Revenue Retention Rate
    Gross Profit of US$84 million, up 20% year-over-year and 7% quarter-over-quarter
    Adjusted EBITDA of US$57 million, up 16% year-over-year and 9% quarter-over-quarter

    • Record TPV of $26 billion, a strong growth to 45% YoY with mix continuing to move to newer more attractive markets, while core markets rebounded from Q3 softness;
    • Revenue and gross profits hitting record highs of $746 million and $295 million, respectively;
    • Adjusted EBITDA to GP margins closing out the year at 64%, but improving consistently as the year progressed.

    dLocal reports in US dollars and in accordance with IFRS as issued by the IASB

    MONTEVIDEO, Uruguay, Feb. 27, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — DLocal Limited (“dLocal”, “we”, “us”, and “our”) (NASDAQ:DLO), a technology – first payments platform today announced its financial results for the fourth quarter ended December 31, 2024..

    As we walk through a review of our performance over the past quarter and year, and as we have repeatedly mentioned, we think of five pillars underpinning dLocal’s investment thesis:

    • A massive addressable market, given the untapped potential of emerging and frontier markets as they digitize payments and merchants go to market throughout the Global South. 85% of the world’s population resides in emerging markets1, and two thirds of global growth by 2035 will come from there2.
    • Consistent high top line growth, driven by a proven track record of delivering value to the world’s most sophisticated global digital merchants that has allowed us to capture a market leading share of this expanding TAM.
    • Attractive margin business with potential to deliver operational leverage once we have laid the foundational blocks and further scale benefits kick in.
    • Strong cash generating financial model as Net Income converts well into FCF.
    • Investment in product development capabilities to drive growth through new categories, products, feature innovations, and potential M&A activity.

    Our FY 2024 results affirm the investment thesis, highlighted by a record TPV of $26 billion, a strong TPV growth of 45% year-over-year, driven by a shift towards newer, more attractive markets, while core markets rebounded from Q3 softness. Additionally, revenue and gross profits reached record highs of $746 million and $295 million, respectively, with an adjusted EBITDA to GP margins closing the year at 64%, showing consistent improvement throughout the year. Furthermore, Net Income to FCF of Own funds3 conversion exited the year at a rate above 100%.

    These strong 2024 results should be seen in the context of a weak first quarter followed by progressively stronger quarter-over-quarter performance, and the continuation of an investment cycle aimed at achieving greater scalability for our business.

    Building on last quarter’s positive trend, our TPV grew over 50% year-over-year, despite a strong Q4 2023 comparison. Quarter-over-quarter, TPV growth accelerated to nearly 20%, driven by commerce seasonality, and strength in remittances and ride-hailing. In constant currency3, given general weakness in Emerging Markets currencies, those growth rates are even more impressive, about 30 points higher year-over-year.

    Revenues surpassed the milestone of over $200 million in Q4, representing a 9% year-over-year growth. In constant currencies4, revenue growth for the period would have been around 40% year-over-year.

    Our growth continues to reinforce our position as a trusted partner for global companies seeking to do business across emerging markets, with performance coming from a well diversified list of countries, with notable contributions from Argentina, Egypt, Other LatAm and Other Africa and Asia markets. As a result of our expansion into more frontier markets, we also continue to see solid growth in our cross-border volumes.

    In terms of profitability, we reached a record gross profit of $84 million, with a net take rate at 1.1%, reflecting the market dynamic where higher volumes drive lower take rates, increase in the payouts share, and the depreciation of emerging market currencies. To offset this, we are driving cost efficiencies through processor and broker renegotiations and improvements in our hedging strategy. We also continue our push into higher take rate markets and verticals, which over the long term, should partially offset the take rate compression.

    Despite the ongoing step up in investments in our engineering team, operational capabilities, and license portfolio to support our long-term growth ambitions, our Adjusted EBITDA hit a record $57 million in the quarter, with an adjusted EBITDA over gross profit margin improving quarter-over-quarter to 68%.

    Cash generation was also solid, as we continue to increase free cash available to deploy behind our capital allocation strategy. This sustained cash generation increases our flexibility when thinking through M&A, buybacks or re-investing in a disciplined manner back into the business.

    In 2024, we added 9 licenses and registrations, including the UK FCA’s Authorised Payment Institution license, which enhances our competitive edge and demonstrates our commitment to compliant practices and regulatory oversight.

    To sum up, Q4 marked the successful end to 2024 in terms of consistent TPV growth, controlled take rate decline, and balance of investment for future growth with a healthy margin and free cash profile.

    Looking ahead to our 2025 guidance5, we expect a strong TPV growth of 35% – 45% year-over-year, with a revenue growth of 25% – 35% year-over-year that shows this sustained momentum of our top line. We see gross profit growth of 20% – 25% year-over-year, and Adjusted EBITDA growth between 20% and 30% year-over-year.

    Considering those assumptions, we should expect a net take rate compression while delivering high TPV growth even at our scale. Over the midterm, we will work to maintain strong TPV while recognizing that given the extremely strong levels of TPV retention we deliver, our larger merchants will continue to attain lower pricing tiers. We will strive to offset this effect through growth in higher take rate new verticals, natural mix shift towards higher take rate frontier markets, and new revenue streams through product launches.

    This guidance highlights that our combination of revenue growth, margin structure and free cash generation is not that common. There are not that many companies today who are as profitable as we are, growing revenues at the pace we are growing, and consistently generating free cash.

    As known, our business thrives in fast-growing, dynamic markets with massive opportunities in digital payments across emerging markets, driven by strong demand and long-term growth trends. However, these markets also bring volatility from macroeconomic shifts, regulatory changes, and currency fluctuations. While we are confident in our long-term high-growth potential, providing mid-term guidance may not accurately reflect the predictability over a multi-year timeframe. For this reason, we have made the decision to discontinue mid-term guidance. We will continue to focus on delivering strong operational execution so as to hit the annual targets we disclose.

    Looking ahead to 2025, we are confident in our ability to sustain momentum. Our investments in technology, product innovation, and market expansion position us well for growth. Despite the volatility of emerging markets, our disciplined scaling, local expertise, and commitment to delivering value to merchants will differentiate us. Our strategy focuses on capturing the potential of digital payments in high-growth regions, driving operational efficiencies, and reinforcing market leadership. We are excited about the opportunities ahead and committed to executing with the same rigor and discipline that have defined our success.

    1 Source: Euromonitor International: Reaching the emerging middle class beyond BRIC; 2 Source: S&P Global Market Intelligence. 3 Please see Reconciliation of TPV and Revenue constant currency measures to reported results of Q4 2024 Earnings Presentation; 4 Please see Reconciliation of TPV and Revenue constant currency measures to reported results of Q4 2024 Earnings Presentation; 5 please see Full year 2025 outlook on slide 23 of Q4 2024 Earnings Presentation.

    Fourth quarter 2024 financial highlights

    • Total Payment Volume (“TPV”) reached a record US$7.7 billion in the fourth quarter, up 51% year-over-year compared to US$5.1 billion in the fourth quarter of 2023 and up 18% compared to US$6.5 billion in the third quarter of 2024. In constant currencies1, TPV growth for the period would have been 81% year-over-year.
    • Revenues amounted to US$204.5 million, up 9% year-over-year compared to US$188.0 million in the fourth quarter of 2023 and up 10% compared to US$185.8 million in the third quarter of 2024. This quarter-over-quarter increase was mostly driven by volume increase in Egypt, as well as positive results in Other LatAm and Other Africa and Asia, with notable performance in South Africa, Turkey, Colombia and Ecuador. In constant currencies1, revenue growth for the period would have been 42% year-over-year.
    • Gross profit was US$83.7 million in the fourth quarter of 2024, up 20% compared to US$69.7 million in the fourth quarter of 2023 and up 7% compared to US$78.2 million in the third quarter of 2024. The improvement in gross profit quarter-over-quarter was primarily due to volume growth in Argentina, Egypt, Nigeria and Turkey. These positive factors were partially offset by (i) Mexico, given the higher growth of Tier 0 merchants coupled with a shift in the payment mix; (ii) Brazil, given the lower take rates from the new Payment Orchestration option launched in the third quarter of 2024 (which positively allowed for volume recovery versus the prior quarter) and shift in the payment mix; and (iii) Other LatAm markets, that despite delivering positive volume performance, on a quarter-over-quarter comparison was impacted by the strong growth in Q3 from wider FX spreads in certain smaller markets, as disclosed in the previous quarterly results.
    • As a result, gross profit margin was 41% in this quarter, compared to 37% in the fourth quarter of 2023 and 42% in the third quarter of 2024.
    • Gross profit over TPV was at 1.1% decreasing from 1.4% in the fourth quarter of 2023 and from 1.2% compared to the third quarter of 2024.
    • Operating income was US$42.3 million, up 3% compared to US$41.0 million in the fourth quarter of 2023 and up 3% compared to US$41.1 million in the third quarter of 2024, as we resumed the pace of certain investments in building out our capabilities. In this context, operating expenses grew by 44% year-over-year, with most of the growth allocated to Product Development & IT capabilities, with these expenses increasing by 70% year-over-year while combined Sales and Marketing (S&M) and G&A expenses grew by 29%. On the sequential comparison, operating expenses increased 12% quarter-over-quarter, a reflection of (i) growth in combined S&M and G&A expenses, driven by continued investment in operating capabilities and marketing investments; and (ii) slightly down tech and development expenses as increases in headcount were offset by reductions in other IT expenditures.
    • As a result, Adjusted EBITDA was US$56.9 million, up 16% compared to US$49.2 million in the fourth quarter of 2023 and up 9% compared to US$52.4 million in the third quarter of 2024.
    • Adjusted EBITDA margin was 28%, compared to the 26% recorded in the fourth quarter of 2023 and 28% in the third quarter of 2024. On the annual comparison, the increase is explained by investments in core areas to drive efficiency and ensure future growth while maintaining our lean and disciplined structure. Adjusted EBITDA over gross profit of 68% decreased compared to 71% in the fourth quarter of 2023 and increased compared to 67% in the third quarter of 2024.
    • Net financial cost was US$1.1 million, compared to a finance income of US$1.0 million in the fourth quarter of 2023 and a cost of US$10.1 million in the third quarter of 2024, as explained in the Net Income section.
    • Our effective income tax rate increased to 27% from 8% last quarter, and stands at 20% on a year-to-date basis. In the fourth quarter of 2024, effective income tax rate was impacted by an income tax settlement related to previous periods. Excluding this tax settlement, our effective income tax rate stood at 16% for the fourth quarter and 17% for the year compared to 16% in 2023, as a result of slightly higher local-to-local share of pre-tax income.
    • Net income for the fourth quarter of 2024 was US$29.7 million, or US$0.10 per diluted share, up 4% compared to a profit of US$28.5 million, or US$0.10 per diluted share, for the fourth quarter of 2023 and up 11% compared to a profit of US$26.8 million, or US$0.09 per diluted share for the third quarter of 2024. During the current period, net income was mostly affected by the positive non-cash mark to market effect related to our Argentine bond investments, lower finance costs partially offset by higher taxes. Adjusted net income for the fourth quarter of 2024 was US$45.8 million, up 13% compared to US$40.6 million for the fourth quarter of 2023 and up 6% compared to US$43.4 million for the third quarter of 2024.
    • As of December 31, 2024, dLocal had US$425.2 million in cash and cash equivalents, including US$189.0 million of own funds and US$236.1 million of merchants’ funds. The consolidated cash position decreased by US$111.0 million from US$536.2 million as of December 31, 2023. When compared to the US$560.5 million cash position as of September 30, 2024, it decreased by US$135.4 million. The variation quarter-over-quarter is primarily explained by changes in merchant working capital, driven by: (i) increase in trade receivables due to temporary settlement delays before year-end; coupled with (ii) decrease in trade payables due to a shift in settlement periods with certain merchants and higher settlement of accumulated merchant balances.

    1Please see Reconciliation of TPV and Revenue constant currency measures to reported results of Q4 2024 Earnings Presentation.

    The following table summarizes our key performance metrics:

      Three months ended December 31 Twelve months ended December 31
      2024 2023 % change 2024 2023 % change
    Key Performance metrics (In millions of US$ except for %)
    TPV 7,714 5,111 51% 25,575 17,677 45%
    Revenue 204.5 188.0 9% 746.0 650.4 15%
    Gross Profit 83.7 69.7 20% 294.7 276.9 6%
    Gross Profit margin 41% 37% 4p.p 40% 43% -3p.p
    Adjusted EBITDA 56.9 49.2 16% 188.7 202.3 -7%
    Adjusted EBITDA margin 28% 26% 2p.p 25% 31% -6p.p
    Adjusted EBITDA/Gross Profit 68% 71% -3p.p 64% 73% -9p.p
    Profit 29.7 28.5 4% 120.5 149.1 -19%
    Profit margin 15% 15% -1p.p 16% 23% -7p.p
                 

    Fourth quarter 2024 business highlights

    • During the fourth quarter of 2024, pay-ins TPV increased 44% year-over-year and 15% quarter-over-quarter to US$5.3 billion, accounting for 69% of the TPV.
    • Pay-outs TPV increased by 68% year-over-year and 26% quarter-over-quarter to US$2.4 billion, accounting for the remaining 31% of the TPV.
    • Cross-border TPV increased by 67% year-over-year and 23% quarter-over-quarter to US$3.7 billion. Cross-border volume accounted for 48% of the TPV in the fourth quarter of 2024.
    • Local-to-local TPV increased by 38% year-over-year and 14% quarter-over-quarter to US$4.0 billion. Local-to-local volume accounted for 52% of the TPV in the fourth quarter of 2024.
    • LatAm revenue increased 16% year-over-year to US$152.9 million, accounting for 75% of total revenue. On the annual comparison, the growth was primarily driven by (i) volume growth in Argentina; and (ii) strong performance of Other LatAm, particularly in Colombia. This result was partially offset by Brazil due to (i) lower take rates from the new Payment Orchestration option launched in the third quarter of 2024; and (ii) shift in the payment mix. Sequentially, LatAm revenue grew by 5%, mainly driven by the performance of Other LatAm, especially in Colombia and Ecuador. The positive result was offset by (i) Argentina, impacted by the lower FX spreads; (ii) Brazil, as previously explained; and (iii) Mexico, due to higher growth of Tier 0 merchants coupled with a shift in the payment mix.
    • In the Africa and Asia region, revenue decreased by 9% year-over-year, primarily driven by Nigeria due to the Naira devaluation in February of 2024; partially offset by (i) the strong growth performance in Egypt; and (ii) in Other Africa and Asia, particularly the performance in South Africa in the commerce vertical. Those regions are also the main drivers of the sequential increase.
    • LatAm gross profit increased by 3% year-over-year and 1% quarter-over-quarter to US$56.4 million, accounting for 67% of total gross profit. Most of the year-over-year increase is explained by the volume growth in Argentina, Mexico, and other LatAm markets, which were mostly offset by Brazil as just explained, and currency devaluations. Sequentially, the growth was mainly driven by Argentina’s positive performance; offset by drivers in Mexico and Brazil, as explained previously. Other Latam markets, which continue to grow TPV, were negatively impacted quarter-over-quarter due to the strong Q3 growth from wider FX spreads in smaller markets, as previously disclosed.
    • Africa and Asia gross profit increased by 82% year-over-year to US$27.3 million, accounting for the remaining 33% of total gross profit. This annual comparison is explained by TPV growth in Egypt, ramp-up of commerce merchants in South Africa, and positive performance in Other Africa and Asia markets, including Turkey and Vietnam. Sequentially, gross profit increased by 21%, attributable to the positive performance in Egypt, Nigeria and Turkey in categories such as remittances, financial services, ads and streaming.
    • During the quarter, Revenue from Existing Merchants reached US$198.3 million compared to US$ 179.9 million in the third quarter of 2024. On the annual comparison, Revenue from Existing Merchants increased by 13% and the net revenue retention rate, or NRR, reached 106%.
    • Revenue from New Merchants accounted for US$6.1 million in the fourth quarter of 2024 compared to US$11.8 million in the same quarter of the prior year.

    The tables below present the breakdown of dLocal’s TPV by product and type of flow:

    In millions of US$ except for % Three months ended December 31 Twelve months ended December 31
      2024 % share 2023 % share 2024 % share 2023 % share
    Pay-ins 5,340 69% 3,701 72% 17,902 70% 12,823 73%
    Pay-outs 2,373 31% 1,410 28% 7,673 30% 4,855 27%
    Total TPV 7,714 100% 5,111 100% 25,575 100% 17,677 100%
                     
    In millions of US$ except for % Three months ended December 31 Twelve months ended December 31
      2024 % share 2023 % share 2024 % share 2023 % share
    Cross-border 3,740 48% 2,235 44% 11,902 47% 8,670 49%
    Local-to-local 3,974 52% 2,876 56% 13,673 53% 9,007 51%
    Total TPV 7,714 100% 5,111 100% 25,575 100% 17,677 100%
                     

    The tables below present the breakdown of dLocal’s revenue by geography:

    In millions of US$ except for % Three months ended December 31 Twelve months ended December 31
      2024 % share 2023 % share 2024 % share 2023 % share
    Latin America 152.9 75% 131.5 70% 562.2 75% 492.7 76%
    Brazil 33.7 16% 50.2 27% 152.0 20% 159.0 24%
    Argentina 25.1 12% 10.5 6% 85.5 11% 75.1 12%
    Mexico 40.5 20% 35.6 19% 149.2 20% 116.8 18%
    Chile 13.5 7% 14.9 8% 51.2 7% 55.7 9%
    Other LatAm 40.1 20% 20.3 11% 124.4 17% 86.1 13%
                     
    Africa & Asia 51.6 25% 56.5 30% 183.8 25% 157.7 24%
    Nigeria 2.9 1% 28.4 15% 13.3 2% 84.0 13%
    Egypt 21.4 10% 18.4 10% 94.0 13% 36.7 6%
    Other Africa & Asia 27.4 13% 9.7 5% 76.5 10% 37.0 6%
                     
    Total Revenue 204.5 100% 188.0 100% 746.0 100% 650.4 100%
                     

    The tables below present the breakdown of dLocal’s gross profit by geography:

    In millions of US$ except for % Three months ended December 31 Twelve months ended December 31
      2024 % share 2023 % share 2024 % share 2023 % share
    Latin America 56.4 67% 54.7 79% 214.2 73% 228.7 83%
    Brazil 14.8 18% 25.5 37% 67.3 23% 78.8 28%
    Argentina 9.2 11% 4.0 6% 28.7 10% 48.7 18%
    Mexico 10.9 13% 9.3 13% 42.5 14% 34.7 13%
    Chile 9.2 11% 9.1 13% 33.1 11% 34.0 12%
    Other LatAm 12.4 15% 7.0 10% 42.6 14% 32.6 12%
                     
    Africa & Asia 27.3 33% 15.0 21% 80.5 27% 48.1 17%
    Nigeria 2.4 3% 1.5 2% 6.6 2% 5.8 2%
    Egypt 16.0 19% 9.6 14% 48.4 16% 26.1 9%
    Other Africa & Asia 8.9 11% 3.9 6% 25.5 9% 16.2 6%
                     
    Total Gross Profit 83.7 100% 69.7 100% 294.7 100% 276.9 100%
                     

    Special note regarding Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Margin

    dLocal has only one operating segment. dLocal measures its operating segment’s performance by Revenues, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Margin, and uses these metrics to make decisions about allocating resources.

    Adjusted EBITDA as used by dLocal is defined as the profit from operations before financing and taxation for the year or period, as applicable, before depreciation of property, plant and equipment, amortization of right-of-use assets and intangible assets, and further excluding the finance income and costs, impairment gains/(losses) on financial assets, transaction costs, share-based payment non-cash charges,other operating gain/loss,other non-recurring costs, and inflation adjustment. dLocal defines Adjusted EBITDA Margin as the Adjusted EBITDA divided by consolidated revenues.

    Although Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Margin may be commonly viewed as non-IFRS measures in other contexts, pursuant to IFRS 8, (“Operating Segments”), Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Margin are treated by dLocal as IFRS measures based on the manner in which dLocal utilizes these measures. Nevertheless, dLocal’s Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Margin metrics should not be viewed in isolation or as a substitute for net income for the periods presented under IFRS. dLocal also believes that its Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Margin metrics are useful metrics used by analysts and investors, although these measures are not explicitly defined under IFRS. Additionally, the way dLocal calculates operating segment’s performance measures may be different from the calculations used by other entities, including competitors, and therefore, dLocal’s performance measures may not be comparable to those of other entities. Finally, dLocal is unable to present a quantitative reconciliation of forward-looking guidance for Adjusted EBITDA because dLocal cannot reliably predict certain of their necessary components, such as impairment gains/(losses) on financial assets, transaction costs, and inflation adjustment.

    The table below presents a reconciliation of dLocal’s Adjusted EBITDA to net income:

    $ in thousands Three months ended December 31 Twelve months ended December 31
      2024 2023 2024 2023
    Profit for the period 29,701 28,481 120,469 149,086
    Income tax expense 11,090 7,476 30,550 29,428
    Depreciation and amortization 4,888 3,604 17,177 12,225
    Finance income and costs, net 1,085 (996) (17,174) (11,394)
    Share-based payment non-cash charges 6,339 4,850 23,780 11,922
    Other operating loss¹ 1,307 – 5,257 –
    Impairment loss / (gain) on financial assets 533 (657) 440 (3,136)
    Inflation adjustment 392 6,040 6,655 12,537
    Other non-recurring costs² 1,571 434 1,571 1,663
    Adjusted EBITDA 56,906 49,232 188,725 202,332
             

    Note: 1 The company wrote-off certain amounts related to merchants/processors off-boarded by dLocal. 2 Other non-recurring costs consist of costs not directly associated with our core business activities, including costs associated with addressing the allegations made by a short-seller report and certain class action and other legal and regulatory expenses (which include fees from counsel, global expert services and a forensic accounting advisory firm) in 2023 and 2024.

    Special note regarding Adjusted Net Income

    Adjusted Net Income is a non-IFRS financial measure. As used by dLocal, Adjusted Net Income is defined as the profit for the period (net income) excluding impairment gains/(losses) on financial assets, transaction costs, share-based payment non-cash charges, and other operating (gain)/loss, in line with our Adjusted EBITDA calculation (see detailed methodology for Adjusted EBITDA on page 13). It further excludes the accounting non-cash charges related to the fair value gain from the Argentine dollar-linked bonds, the exchange difference loss from the intercompany loan denominated in USD that we granted to our Argentine subsidiary to purchase the bonds, and the hedging cost associated with the Argentina treasury notes. In addition, it excludes the inflation adjustment based on IFRS rules for hyperinflationary economies. We believe Adjusted Net Income is a useful measure for understanding our results of operations while excluding certain non-cash effects such as currency devaluation, inflation, and hedging costs. Our calculation for Adjusted Net Income may differ from similarly-titled measures presented by other companies and should not be considered in isolation or as a replacement for our measure of profit for the period as presented in accordance with IFRS.

    The table below presents a reconciliation of dLocal’s Adjusted net income:

    $ in thousands Three months ended December 31 Twelve months ended December 31
      2024 2023 2024 2023
    Net income as reported 29,701 28,481 120,469 149,086
    Inflation adjustment 392 6,040 6,655 12,537
    Loan – exchange difference 2,332 51,858 22,602 81,024
    Argentina Treasury Notes Hedging Costs 5,536 – 9,808 –
    Fair value loss / (gain) of financial assets at FVTPL (5,115) (50,754) (38,609) (78,640)
    Impairment loss / (gain) on financial assets 533 (657) 440 (3,135)
    Share-based payment non-cash charges 6,339 4,850 23,780 11,922
    Other operating loss¹ 1,307 – 5,257 –
    Other non-recurring costs³ 1,571 434 1,571 1,663
    Tax effect on adjustments (1,310) 386 (899) 834
    Adjusted net income 45,828 40,638 155,616 175,291
             

    Unaudited quarterly results.

    Note: 1 The company wrote-off certain amounts related to merchants/processors off-boarded by dLocal. 2 In Q4 2024, income tax was impacted by an income tax settlement related to previous periods, as disclosed in the Note 12 – Income Tax. 3 Other non-recurring costs consist of costs not directly associated with our core business activities, including costs associated with addressing the allegations made by a short-seller report and certain class action and other legal and regulatory expenses (which include fees from counsel, global expert services and a forensic accounting advisory firm) in 2023 and 2024.

    Earnings per share

    We calculate basic earnings per share by dividing the profit attributable to owners of the group by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the three-month and twelve-month periods ended December 31, 2024 and 2023.

    Our diluted earnings per share is calculated by dividing the profit attributable to owners of the group of dLocal by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period plus the weighted average number of common shares that would be issued on conversion of all dilutive potential common shares into common shares.

    The following table presents the information used as a basis for the calculation of our earnings per share:

      Three months ended December 31 Twelve months ended December 31
      2024 2023 2024 2023
    Profit attributable to common shareholders (USD) 29,682,000 28,515,000 120,416,000 148,964,000
    Weighted average number of common shares 280,443,489 290,657,015 290,014,019 291,982,305
    Adjustments for calculation of diluted earnings per share 14,417,466 5,008,261 15,122,271 10,976,123
    Weighted average number of common shares for calculating diluted earnings per share 294,860,956 295,665,276 305,136,290 302,958,428
    Basic earnings per share 0.11 0.10 0.42 0.51
    Diluted earnings per share 0.10 0.10 0.39 0.49
             

    This press release does not contain sufficient information to constitute an interim financial report as defined in International Accounting Standards 34, “Interim Financial Reporting” nor a financial statement as defined by International Accounting Standards 1 “Presentation of Financial Statements”. The quarterly financial information in this press release has not been audited, whereas the annual results for the year ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 are audited.

    Conference call and webcast
    dLocal’s management team will host a conference call and audio webcast on February 27, 2025 at 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time. Please click here to pre-register for the conference call and obtain your dial in number and passcode.

    The live conference call can be accessed via audio webcast at the investor relations section of dLocal’s website, at https://investor.dlocal.com/. An archive of the webcast will be available for a year following the conclusion of the conference call. The investor presentation will also be filed on EDGAR at www.sec.gov.

    About dLocal
    dLocal powers local payments in emerging markets, connecting global enterprise merchants with billions of emerging market consumers in more than 40 countries across Africa, Asia, and Latin America. Through the “One dLocal” platform (one direct API, one platform, and one contract), global companies can accept payments, send pay-outs and settle funds globally without the need to manage separate pay-in and pay-out processors, set up numerous local entities, and integrate multiple acquirers and payment methods in each market.

    Definition of selected operational metrics
    “API” means application programming interface, which is a general term for programming techniques that are available for software developers when they integrate with a particular service or application. In the payments industry, APIs are usually provided by any party participating in the money flow (such as payment gateways, processors, and service providers) to facilitate the money transfer process.

    “Cross-border” means a payment transaction whereby dLocal is collecting in one currency and settling into a different currency and/or in a different geography.

    “Local payment methods” refers to any payment method that is processed in the country where the end user of the merchant sending or receiving payments is located, which include credit and debit cards, cash payments, bank transfers, mobile money, and digital wallets.

    “Local-to-local” means a payment transaction whereby dLocal is collecting and settling in the same currency.

    “Net Revenue Retention Rate” or “NRR” is a U.S. dollar-based measure of retention and growth of dLocal’s merchants. NRR is calculated for a period or year by dividing the Current Period/Year Revenue by the Prior Period/Year Revenue. The Prior Period/Year Revenue is the revenue billed by us to all our customers in the prior period. The Current Period/Year Revenue is the revenue billed by us in the current period to the same customers included in the Prior Period/Year Revenue. Current Period/Year Revenue includes revenues from any upselling and cross-selling across products, geographies, and payment methods to such merchant customers, and is net of any contractions or attrition, in respect of such merchant customers, and excludes revenue from new customers on-boarded in the preceding twelve months. As most of dLocal revenues come from existing merchants, the NRR rate is a key metric used by management, and we believe it is useful for investors in order to assess our retention of existing customers and growth in revenues from our existing customer base.

    “Pay-in” means a payment transaction whereby dLocal’s merchant customers receive payment from their customers.

    “Pay-out” means a payment transaction whereby dLocal disburses money in local currency to the business partners or customers of dLocal’s merchant customers.

    “Revenue from New Merchants” means the revenue billed by us to merchant customers that we did not bill revenues in the same quarter (or period) of the prior year.

    “Revenue from Existing Merchants” means the revenue billed by us in the last twelve months to the merchant customers that we billed revenue in the same quarter (or period) of the prior year.

    “TPV” dLocal presents total payment volume, or TPV, which is an operating metric of the aggregate value of all payments successfully processed through dLocal’s payments platform. Because revenue depends significantly on the total value of transactions processed through the dLocal platform, management believes that TPV is an indicator of the success of dLocal’s global merchants, the satisfaction of their end users, and the scale and growth of dLocal’s business.

    Rounding: We have made rounding adjustments to some of the figures included in this interim report. Accordingly, numerical figures shown as totals in some tables may not be an arithmetic aggregation of the figures that preceded them.

    Forward-looking statements
    This press release contains certain forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements convey dLocal’s current expectations or forecasts of future events, including guidance in respect of total payment volume, revenue, gross profit and Adjusted EBITDA. Forward-looking statements regarding dLocal and amounts stated as guidance are based on current management expectations and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause dLocal’s actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performances or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Certain of these risks and uncertainties are described in the “Risk Factors,” “Forward-Looking Statements” and “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” sections of dLocal’s filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Unless required by law, dLocal undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements to reflect circumstances or events after the date hereof. In addition, dLocal is unable to present a quantitative reconciliation of forward-looking guidance for Adjusted EBITDA, because dLocal cannot reliably predict certain of their necessary components, such as impairment gains/(losses) on financial assets, transaction costs, and inflation adjustment.

    dLocal Limited
    Certain financial information
    Consolidated Condensed Interim Statements of Comprehensive Income for the three-month and twelve-month periods ended December 31, 2024 and 2023
    (All amounts in thousands of U.S. Dollars except share data or as otherwise indicated)

      Three months ended December 31 Twelve months ended December 31
      2024 2023 2024 2023
    Continuing operations        
    Revenues 204,491 188,005 745,974 650,351
    Cost of services (120,780) (118,286) (451,301) (373,492)
    Gross profit 83,711 69,719 294,673 276,859
             
    Technology and development expenses (6,822) (4,024) (25,625) (12,650)
    Sales and marketing expenses (5,598) (4,710) (21,626) (17,120)
    General and administrative expenses (27,183) (20,641) (101,225) (70,568)
    Impairment (loss)/gain on financial assets (533) 657 (440) 3,136
    Other operating (loss)/gain (1,307) – (5,257) –
    Operating profit 42,268 41,001 140,500 179,657
    Finance income 12,036 57,913 66,875 128,228
    Finance costs (13,121) (56,917) (49,701) (116,834)
    Inflation adjustment (392) (6,040) (6,655) (12,537)
    Other results (1,477) (5,044) 10,519 (1,143)
    Profit before income tax 40,791 35,957 151,019 178,514
    Income tax expense (11,090) (7,476) (30,550) (29,428)
    Profit for the period 29,701 28,481 120,469 149,086
             
    Profit attributable to:        
    Owners of the Group 29,682 28,515 120,416 148,964
    Non-controlling interest 19 (34) 53 122
    Profit for the period 29,701 28,481 120,469 149,086
             
    Earnings per share (in USD)        
    Basic Earnings per share 0.11 0.10 0.42 0.51
    Diluted Earnings per share 0.10 0.10 0.39 0.49
             
    Other comprehensive income        
    Items that may be reclassified to profit or loss:        
    Exchange difference on translation on foreign operations (4,417) (9,054) (11,188) (7,713)
    Other comprehensive income for the period, net of tax (4,417) (9,054) (11,188) (7,713)
    Total comprehensive income for the period, net of tax 25,284 19,427 109,281 141,373
             
    Total comprehensive income for the period        
    Owners of the Group 25,311 19,463 109,290 141,255
    Non-controlling interest (27) (36) (9) 118
    Total comprehensive income for the period 25,284 19,427 109,281 141,373
             

    dLocal Limited
    Certain financial information
    Consolidated Condensed Interim Statements of Financial Position as of December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023
    (All amounts in thousands of U.S. dollars)

      December 31, 2024   December 31, 2023
    ASSETS      
    Current Assets      
    Cash and cash equivalents 425,172   536,160
    Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss 129,319   102,677
    Trade and other receivables 496,713   363,374
    Derivative financial instruments 2,874   2,040
    Other assets 18,805   11,782
    Total Current Assets 1,072,883   1,016,033
           
    Non-Current Assets      
    Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss –   1,710
    Trade and other receivables 18,044   –
    Deferred tax assets 5,367   2,217
    Property, plant and equipment 3,377   2,917
    Right-of-use assets 3,645   3,689
    Intangible assets 63,318   57,887
    Other assets 4,695   –
    Total Non-Current Assets 98,446   68,420
    TOTAL ASSETS 1,171,329   1,084,453
           
    LIABILITIES      
    Current Liabilities      
    Trade and other payables 597,787   602,493
    Lease liabilities 1,137   626
    Tax liabilities 21,515   20,800
    Derivative financial instruments 6,227   948
    Financial liabilities 50,455   –
    Provisions 500   362
    Total Current Liabilities 677,621   625,229
           
    Non-Current Liabilities      
    Deferred tax liabilities 1,858   753
    Lease liabilities 2,863   3,331
    Total Non-Current Liabilities 4,721   4,084
    TOTAL LIABILITIES 682,342   629,313
           
    EQUITY      
    Share Capital 570   591
    Share Premium 186,769   173,001
    Treasury Shares (200,980)   (99,936)
    Capital Reserve 33,438   21,575
    Other Reserves (20,934)   (9,808)
    Retained earnings 490,024   369,608
    Total Equity Attributable to owners of the Group 488,887   455,031
    Non-controlling interest 100   109
    TOTAL EQUITY 488,987   455,140
    TOTAL EQUITY AND LIABILITIES 1,171,329   1,084,453
           

    dLocal Limited
    Certain interim financial information
    Consolidated Statements of Cash flows for the three-month and twelve-month periods ended December 31, 2024 and 2023
    (All amounts in thousands of U.S. dollars)

      Three months ended December 31 Twelve months ended December 31
      2024 2023 2024 2023
    Cash flows from operating activities        
    Profit before income tax 40,791 35,957 151,019 178,514
    Adjustments:        
    Interest Income from financial instruments (6,921) (7,159) (28,266) (49,588)
    Interest charges for lease liabilities 370 110 501 578
    Other interests charges 739 2,503 3,758 5,623
    Finance expense related to derivative financial instruments (627) 5,497 19,462 28,013
    Net exchange differences 5,914 50,100 24,787 82,620
    Fair value loss/(gain) on financial assets at FVPL (3,922) (50,754) (37,416) (78,640)
    Amortization of Intangible assets 4,364 3,251 15,511 10,816
    Depreciation and disposals of PP&E and right-of-use 652 353 1,884 1,409
    Share-based payment expense, net of forfeitures 6,339 4,850 23,780 11,922
    Other operating gain 786 – 4,736 –
    Net Impairment loss/(gain) on financial assets 533 2,796 440 318
    Inflation adjustment and other financial results (5,704) 9,041 (17,063) 9,041
      43,313 56,546 163,133 200,626
    Changes in working capital        
    Increase in Trade and other receivables (109,487) (51,154) (162,645) (123,246)
    Decrease / (Increase) in Other assets 4,128 13,258 5,427 45,007
    Increase / (Decrease) in Trade and Other payables (70,700) 52,654 (6,957) 194,619
    Increase / (Decrease) in Tax Liabilities (3,835) (6,591) (3,184) (10,967)
    Increase / (Decrease) in Provisions 222 (275) 138 (1,111)
    Cash (used) / generated from operating activities (136,359) 64,438 (4,088) 304,928
    Income tax paid (4,773) (2,996) (28,696) (11,475)
    Net cash (used) / generated from operating activities (141,132) 61,442 (32,784) 293,453
             
    Cash flows from investing activities        
    Acquisitions of Property, plant and equipment (427) 21 (1,705) (965)
    Additions of Intangible assets (5,699) (4,758) (20,942) (17,260)
    Acquisition of financial assets at FVPL (14,852) (15,847) (121,468) (117,517)
    Collections of financial assets at FVPL – 3,721 108,097 1,487
    Interest collected from financial instruments 6,921 7,159 28,266 49,588
    Payments for investments in other assets at FVPL (10,000) – (10,000) –
    Net cash (used in) / generated investing activities (24,057) (9,704) (17,752) (84,667)
             
    Cash flows from financing activities        
    Repurchase of shares – – (101,067) (97,929)
    Share-options exercise paid 358 – 1,853 153
    Interest payments on lease liability (370) (110) (501) (578)
    Principal payments on lease liability (112) (315) (552) (1,103)
    Finance expense paid related to derivative financial instruments (8) (7,640) (15,017) (28,443)
    Net proceeds from financial liabilities 33,653 – 50,428 –
    Interest payments on financial liabilities (1,633) – (2,281) –
    Other finance expense paid (327) (2,851) (1,450) (5,971)
    Net cash used in by financing activities 31,561 (10,916) (68,587) (133,871)
    Net increase in cash flow (133,628) 40,822 (119,123) 74,915
             
    Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period 560,533 498,165 536,160 468,092
    Net (decrease)/increase in cash flow (133,628) 40,822 (119,123) 74,915
    Effects of exchange rate changes on inflation and cash and cash equivalents (1,732) (2,827) 8,135 (6,847)
    Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period 425,172 536,160 425,172 536,160
             

    Investor Relations Contact:
    investor@dlocal.com

    Media Contact:
    media@dlocal.com

    The MIL Network –

    February 28, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: Epsilon Energy Ltd. Announces the Following Headlines

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    • Board declares dividend of $0.0625 per common share
    • Company announces the timing of its 2024 year end earnings release and conference call

    HOUSTON, Feb. 27, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Epsilon Energy Ltd. (“Epsilon” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ: EPSN) today announced that its Board of Directors has declared a dividend of $0.0625 per share of common stock (annualized $0.25/sh) to the stock holders of record at the close of business on March 13, 2025, payable on March 31, 2025. All dividends paid by the Company are “eligible dividends” as defined in subsection 89(1) of the Income Tax Act (Canada), unless indicated otherwise.

    The Company also announced that it will issue its year end 2024 earnings release on Wednesday, March 19, 2025 after the market close and host a conference call to discuss its financial and operating results on Thursday, March 20, 2025 at 10:30 a.m. Central Time (11:30 a.m. Eastern Time).

    Interested parties in the United States and Canada may participate toll-free by dialing (833) 816-1385. International parties may participate by dialing (412) 317-0478. Participants should ask to be joined to the “Epsilon Energy 2024 Year End Earnings Conference Call.”

    A webcast can be viewed at: https://event.choruscall.com/mediaframe/webcast.html?webcastid=lEJXH1I5. A webcast replay will be available on the Company’s website (www.epsilonenergyltd.com) following the call.

    About Epsilon

    Epsilon Energy Ltd. is a North American onshore natural gas and oil production and gathering company with assets in Pennsylvania, Texas, New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Alberta, Canada.

    Contact Information:

    281-670-0002

    Jason Stabell
    Chief Executive Officer
    Jason.Stabell@EpsilonEnergyLTD.com

    Andrew Williamson
    Chief Financial Officer
    Andrew.Williamson@EpsilonEnergyLTD.com

    The MIL Network –

    February 28, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: ARRAY Technologies, Inc. Reports Financial Results for the Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2024

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Fourth Quarter 2024 Financial Highlights

    • Revenue of $275.2 million
    • Gross Margin of 28.5%
    • Adjusted gross margin(1) of 29.8%
    • Net loss to common shareholders of $(141.2) million
      • Net loss to common shareholders inclusive of $74.0 million non-cash goodwill impairment charge and $91.9 million non-cash long-lived intangible asset write-down associated with the 2022 STI acquisition
    • Adjusted EBITDA(1) of $45.2 million
    • Net loss per basic and diluted share of $(0.93)
    • Adjusted net income per diluted share(1) of $0.16

    Full Year 2024 Financial Highlights

    • Revenue of $915.8 million
    • Gross Margin of 32.5%
    • Adjusted gross margin (1) of 34.1%
    • Net loss to common shareholders of $(296.1) million
      • Net loss to common shareholders inclusive of $236.0 million non-cash goodwill impairment charge and $91.9 million non-cash long-lived intangible asset write-down associated with the 2022 STI acquisition
    • Adjusted EBITDA(1) of $173.6 million
    • Net loss per basic and diluted share of $(1.95)
    • Adjusted net income per diluted share(1) of $0.60
    • Free cash flow(1) of $135.4 million
    • Total executed contracts and awarded orders at December 31, 2024 were $2.0 billion

    ALBUQUERQUE, N.M., Feb. 27, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — ARRAY Technologies (NASDAQ: ARRY) (“ARRAY” or the “Company”), a global leader in utility-scale solar tracking, today announced financial results for its fourth quarter and full year ended December 31, 2024.

    “ARRAY delivered strong fourth quarter and full year 2024 results, we exceeded the mid-point of our fourth quarter revenue guidance and achieved record gross margin on the full year. Our ongoing focus on operational execution continues to translate into robust profitability and healthy cash flow. We finished 2024 with an orderbook of $2 billion, representing 10% year-on-year growth. We are pleased with our results, which delivered significant progress in both market share and commercial growth. Thank you to our employees for their continued focus and hard work. Additionally, we are on track to deliver 100% domestic content solar trackers by the first half of 2025. Our OmniTrack™ product continues to gain traction in the market, and now accounts for over 20% of our orderbook. We are excited about our investment in Swap Robotics, a disruptive technology driving automation in PV installations. We believe the integration of Swap Robotics technology into our product portfolio will drive project efficiencies and cost savings for our customers,” said Chief Executive Officer, Kevin G. Hostetler.

    Mr. Hostetler continued, “While persistent headwinds, including permitting and interconnection delays, shortages of high-voltage circuit breakers and transformers, and labor constraints—continue to impact project timelines in the United States, we experienced the market stabilizing by year-end, in contrast to the delays experienced in the middle of the year. In Europe, we anticipate modest growth in 2025 as we are well positioned to capture additional market share. However, in Brazil, macro factors such as currency devaluation, volatile interest rates, and newly introduced tariffs on solar components have impacted growth. For 2025, at the midpoint of our guidance, ARRAY expects to deliver over 20% year-over-year revenue growth. We are optimistic about future demand growth for utility-scale solar energy both domestically and internationally and confident that our value proposition in the industry will continue to propel growth for years to come.”

    First Quarter and Full Year 2025 Guidance

    Given the uncertainty in the utility-scale solar energy market and headwinds we experienced during 2024 which pushed out project timelines, we are providing guidance for the first quarter of 2025. It is not our intention to provide quarterly guidance in the future. For the quarter ending March 31, 2025, the Company expects:

    • Revenue to be in the range of $260 million to $270 million
    • Adjusted EBITDA margin(2) to be in the range of 11% to 13%

    For the year ending December 31, 2025, the Company expects:

    • Revenue to be in the range of $1.05 billion to $1.15 billion
    • Adjusted EBITDA(2) to be in the range of $180 million to $200 million
    • Adjusted net income per share(2) to be in the range of $0.60 to $0.70

    Supplemental Presentation and Conference Call Information

    ARRAY has posted a supplemental presentation to its website, which will be discussed during the conference call hosted by management today (February 27, 2025) at 5:00 p.m. (ET). The conference call can be accessed live over the phone by dialing (877)-869-3847 (domestic) or (201)-689-8261 (international) and entering the passcode 13750627 or via webcast of the live conference call by logging onto the Investor Relations sections of the Company’s website at http://ir.arraytechinc.com. A telephonic replay will be available approximately three hours after the call by dialing (877)-660-6853 (domestic), or (201)-612-7415 (international) with the passcode 13750627. The replay will be available until 11:59 p.m. (ET) on March 13, 2025. The online replay will be available for 30 days on the same website immediately following the call.

    About ARRAY Technologies, Inc.

    ARRAY Technologies (NASDAQ: ARRY) is a leading global provider of solar tracking technology to utility-scale and distributed generation customers, who construct, develop, and operate solar PV sites. With solutions engineered to withstand the harshest weather conditions, ARRAY’s high-quality solar trackers, software platforms and field services combine to maximize energy production and deliver value to our customers for the entire lifecycle of a project. Founded and headquartered in the United States, ARRAY is rooted in manufacturing and driven by technology – relying on its domestic manufacturing, diversified global supply chain, and customer-centric approach to design, deliver, commission, train, and support solar energy deployment around the world. For more news and information on ARRAY, please visit arraytechinc.com.

    Investor Relations Contact:
    Keith Jennings
    505-437-0010
    investors@arraytechinc.com

    Media Contact:
    Nicole Stewart
    505-589-8257

    Forward-Looking Statements

    This press release contains forward-looking statements that are based on our management’s beliefs and assumptions and on information currently available to our management. Forward-looking statements include information concerning our possible or assumed future results of operations, business strategies, technology or product developments, financing and investment plans, dividend policy, competitive position, industry and regulatory environment, potential growth opportunities and the effects of competition. Forward-looking statements include statements that are not historical facts and can be identified by terms such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “anticipates,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” “seek,” “should,” “will,” “would,” “designed to” or similar expressions and the negatives of those terms.

    ARRAY’s actual results and the timing of events could materially differ from those anticipated in such forward-looking statements as a result of certain risks, uncertainties and other factors, including without limitation: changes in growth or rate of growth in demand for solar energy projects; competitive pressures within our industry; factors affecting viability and demand for solar energy, including but not limited to, the retail price of electricity, availability of in-demand components like high voltage breakers, various policies related to the permitting and interconnection costs of solar plants, and the availability of incentives for solar energy and solar energy production systems, which makes it difficult to predict our future prospects; competition from conventional and renewable energy sources; a loss of one or more of our significant customers, their inability to perform under their contracts, or their default in payment; a drop in the price of electricity derived from the utility grid or from alternative energy sources; fluctuations in our results of operations across fiscal periods, which could make our future performance difficult to predict and could cause our results of operations for a particular period to fall below expectations; any increase in interest rates, or a reduction in the availability of tax equity or project debt capital in the global financial markets, which could make it difficult for customers to finance the cost of a solar energy system; existing electric utility industry policies and regulations, and any subsequent changes or new related policies and regulations, may present technical, regulatory and economic barriers to the purchase and use of solar energy systems, which may significantly reduce demand for our products or harm our ability to compete; the interruption of the flow of materials from international vendors, which could disrupt our supply chain, including as a result of the imposition of new and/or additional duties, tariffs and other charges or restrictions on imports and exports; changes in the global trade environment, including the imposition of import tariffs or other import restrictions; geopolitical, macroeconomic and other market conditions unrelated to our operating performance including but not limited to a pandemic, the Ukraine-Russia war, attacks on shipping in the Red Sea, conflict in the Middle East, and inflation and interest rates; our ability to convert our orders in backlog into revenue; the reduction, elimination or expiration, or our failure to optimize the benefits of government incentives for, or regulations mandating the use of, renewable energy and solar energy, particularly in relation to our competitors; failure to, or incurrence of significant costs in order to, obtain, maintain, protect, defend or enforce, our intellectual property and other proprietary right; delays in construction projects and any failure to manage our inventory; significant changes in the cost of raw materials; disruptions to transportation and logistics, including increases in shipping costs; defects or performance problems in our products, which could result in loss of customers, reputational damage and decreased revenue; delays, disruptions or quality control problems in our product development operations; our ability to retain our key personnel or failure to attract additional qualified personnel; additional business, financial, regulatory and competitive risks due to our continued planned expansion into new markets; cybersecurity or other data incidents, including unauthorized disclosure of personal or sensitive data or theft of confidential information; a failure to maintain an effective system of integrated internal controls over financial reporting; our substantial indebtedness, risks related to actual or threatened public health epidemics, pandemics, outbreaks or crises; changes to laws and regulations, including changes to tax laws and regulations, that are applied adversely to us or our customers, including our ability to optimize those changes brought about by the passage of the Inflation Reduction Act or any repeal thereof; and the other risks and uncertainties described in more detail in the Company’s most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K and other documents on file with the SEC, each of which can be found on our website, www.arraytechinc.com.

    Except as required by law, we assume no obligation to update these forward-looking statements, or to update the reasons actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements, even if new information becomes available in the future.

    Non-GAAP Financial Information

    This press release includes certain financial measures that are not presented in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), including Adjusted gross profit, Adjusted gross margin, Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted net income, Adjusted net income per share, Adjusted general and administrative expense and Free cash flow.

    We define Adjusted gross profit as gross profit plus (i) amortization of developed technology and (ii) other costs if applicable. We define Adjusted gross margin as Adjusted gross profit as a percentage of revenue. We define Adjusted EBITDA as net income (loss) plus (i) other expense, net, (ii) foreign currency (gain) loss, net, (iii) preferred dividends and accretion, (iv) interest expense, (v) income tax (benefit) expense, (vi) depreciation expense, (vii) amortization of intangibles, (viii) amortization of developed technology, (ix) equity-based compensation, (x) change in fair value of contingent consideration, (xi) impairment of long-lived assets, (xii) goodwill impairment, (xiii) certain legal expenses, and (xiv) other costs. We define Adjusted net income as net income (loss) to common shareholders plus (i) amortization of intangibles, (ii) amortization of developed technology, (iii) amortization of debt discount and issuance costs (iv) preferred accretion, (v) equity-based compensation, (vi) change in fair value of contingent consideration, (vii) impairment of long-lived assets, (viii) goodwill impairment, (ix) certain legal expenses, (x) other costs, and (xi) income tax (benefit) expense adjustments. We define Adjusted general and administrative expense as general and administrative expense less (i) equity based compensation, (ii) certain legal expenses, (iii) other costs and (iv) income tax expense adjustments. We define Free cash flow as Cash provided by (used in) operating activities less purchase of property, plant and equipment and cash payments for the acquisition of right-of-use assets.

    A detailed reconciliation between GAAP results and results excluding special items (“non-GAAP”) is included within this presentation. We calculate net income (loss) per share as net income (loss) to common shareholders divided by the basic and diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding for the applicable period and we define Adjusted net income per share as Adjusted net income (as detailed above) divided by the basic and diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding for the applicable period.

    We believe that these non-GAAP financial measures are provided to enhance the reader’s understanding of our past financial performance and our prospects for the future. Our management team uses these non-GAAP financial measures in assessing the Company’s performance, as well as in planning and forecasting future periods. The non-GAAP financial information is presented for supplemental informational purposes only and should not be considered a substitute for financial information presented in accordance with GAAP and may be different from similarly titled non-GAAP measures used by other companies.

    Among other limitations, Adjusted gross profit, Adjusted gross margin, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted net income do not reflect our cash expenditures, or future requirements, for capital expenditures or contractual commitments; do not reflect the impact of certain cash charges resulting from matters we consider not to be indicative of our ongoing operations; do not reflect income tax expense or benefit; and other companies in our industry may calculate Adjusted gross profit, Adjusted gross margin, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted net income differently than we do, which limits their usefulness as comparative measures. Because of these limitations, Adjusted gross profit, Adjusted gross margin, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted net income should not be considered in isolation or as substitutes for performance measures calculated in accordance with GAAP.

    We compensate for these limitations by relying primarily on our GAAP results and using Adjusted gross profit, Adjusted gross margin, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted net income on a supplemental basis.

    You should review the reconciliation of gross profit to Adjusted gross profit and net income (loss) to Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted net income below and not rely on any single financial measure to evaluate our business.

    (1) A reconciliation of the most comparable GAAP measure to its Non-GAAP measure is included below.
    (2) A reconciliation of projected Adjusted gross profit, Adjusted gross margin, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted net income per share, which are forward-looking measures that are not prepared in accordance with GAAP, to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures, is not provided because we are unable to provide such reconciliation without unreasonable effort. The inability to provide a quantitative reconciliation is due to the uncertainty and inherent difficulty predicting the occurrence, the financial impact and the periods in which the components of the applicable GAAP measures and non-GAAP adjustments may be recognized. The GAAP measures may include the impact of such items as non-cash share-based compensation, revaluation of the fair-value of our contingent consideration, and the tax effect of such items, in addition to other items we have historically excluded from Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted net income per share. We expect to continue to exclude these items in future disclosures of these non-GAAP measures and may also exclude other similar items that may arise in the future (collectively, “non-GAAP adjustments”). The decisions and events that typically lead to the recognition of non-GAAP adjustments are inherently unpredictable as to if or when they may occur. As such, for our 2025 outlook, we have not included estimates for these items and are unable to address the probable significance of the unavailable information, which could be material to future results.

    Array Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
    Consolidated Balance Sheets (unaudited)
    (in thousands, except per share and share amounts)
     
      December 31,
        2024       2023  
    ASSETS
    Current assets      
    Cash and cash equivalents $ 362,992     $ 249,080  
    Restricted cash   1,149       —  
    Accounts receivable, net   275,838       332,152  
    Inventories   200,818       161,964  
    Prepaid expenses and other   157,927       89,085  
    Total current assets   998,724       832,281  
           
    Property, plant and equipment, net   26,222       27,893  
    Goodwill   160,189       435,591  
    Other intangible assets, net   181,409       354,389  
    Deferred income tax assets   17,754       15,870  
    Other assets   41,701       40,717  
    Total assets $ 1,425,999     $ 1,706,741  
           
    LIABILITIES, REDEEMABLE PERPETUAL PREFERRED STOCK AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
    Current liabilities      
    Accounts payable $ 172,368     $ 119,498  
    Accrued expenses and other   91,183       70,211  
    Accrued warranty reserve   2,063       2,790  
    Income tax payable   5,227       5,754  
    Deferred revenue   119,775       66,488  
    Current portion of contingent consideration   1,193       1,427  
    Current portion of debt   30,714       21,472  
    Other current liabilities   15,291       48,051  
    Total current liabilities   437,814       335,691  
           
    Deferred income tax liabilities   21,398       66,858  
    Contingent consideration, net of current portion   7,868       8,936  
    Other long-term liabilities   18,684       20,428  
    Long-term warranty   4,830       3,372  
    Long-term debt, net of current portion   646,570       660,948  
    Total liabilities   1,137,164       1,096,233  
           
    Commitments and contingencies (Note 16)      
           
    Series A Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock: $0.001 par value; 500,000 shares authorized; 460,920 and 432,759 issued, respectively; liquidation preference of $493.1 million at both dates   406,931       351,260  
           
    Stockholders’ equity      
    Preferred stock $0.001 par value – 4,500,000 shares authorized; none issued at respective dates   —       —  
    Common stock $0.001 par value – 1,000,000,000 shares authorized; 151,951,652 and 151,242,120 shares issued at respective dates   151       151  
    Additional paid-in capital   297,780       344,517  
    Accumulated deficit   (370,624 )     (130,230 )
    Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)   (45,403 )     44,810  
    Total stockholders’ equity   (118,096 )     259,248  
    Total liabilities, redeemable perpetual preferred stock and stockholders’ equity $ 1,425,999     $ 1,706,741  
    Array Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
    Consolidated Statements of Operations (unaudited)
    (in thousands, except per share amounts)
     
      Three Months Ended
    December 31,
      Year Ended
    December 31,
        2024       2023       2024       2023  
    Revenue $ 275,232     $ 341,615     $ 915,807     $ 1,576,551  
    Cost of revenue:              
    Cost of product and service revenue   193,273       253,746       603,572       1,146,442  
    Amortization of developed technology   3,640       3,640       14,558       14,558  
    Total cost of revenue   196,913       257,386       618,130       1,161,000  
    Gross profit   78,319       84,229       297,677       415,551  
                   
    Operating expenses:              
    General and administrative   45,663       43,710       160,567       159,535  
    Change in fair value of contingent consideration   396       732       125       2,964  
    Depreciation and amortization   8,702       9,567       36,086       38,928  
    Long-lived assets impairment   91,904       —       91,904   —   —  
    Goodwill impairment   74,000       —       236,000       —  
    Total operating expenses   220,665       54,009       524,682       201,427  
                   
    (Loss) income from operations   (142,346 )     30,220       (227,005 )     214,124  
                   
    Other income (expense), net   654       (888 )     (1,008 )     (1,015 )
    Interest income   4,092       2,206       16,777       8,330  
    Foreign currency (loss) gain, net   (3,442 )     (326 )     (4,515 )     (53 )
    Interest expense   (9,007 )     (8,857 )     (34,825 )     (44,229 )
    Total other (expense) income   (7,703 )     (7,865 )     (23,571 )     (36,967 )
                   
    (Loss) income before income tax expense (benefit)   (150,049 )     22,355       (250,576 )     177,157  
    Income tax (benefit) expense   (23,146 )     3,013       (10,182 )     39,917  
    Net (loss) income   (126,903 )     19,342       (240,394 )     137,240  
    Preferred dividends and accretion   14,338       13,332       55,670       51,691  
    Net (loss) income to common shareholders $ (141,241 )   $ 6,010     $ (296,064 )   $ 85,549  
                   
    (Loss) income per common share              
    Basic $ (0.93 )   $ 0.04     $ (1.95 )   $ 0.57  
    Diluted $ (0.93 )   $ 0.04     $ (1.95 )   $ 0.56  
                   
    Weighted average common shares outstanding              
    Basic   151,944       151,175       151,754       150,942  
    Diluted   151,944       152,110       151,754       152,022  
    Array Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
    Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited)
    (in thousands)
     
      Three Months Ended
    December 31,
      Year Ended
    December 31,
        2024       2023       2024       2023  
    Operating activities:              
    Net income (loss) $ (126,903 )   $ 19,342     $ (240,394 )   $ 137,240  
    Adjustments to net income (loss):              
    Goodwill impairment   74,000       —       236,000       —  
    Impairment of long-lived assets   91,904       —       91,904       —  
    Provision for bad debts   (1,357 )     2,644       2,058       2,527  
    Deferred tax benefit   (30,371 )     (6,534 )     (37,650 )     (8,862 )
    Depreciation and amortization   9,206       9,950       38,221       40,268  
    Amortization of developed technology   3,640       3,640       14,558       14,558  
    Amortization of debt discount and issuance costs   1,435       1,447       6,087       10,570  
    Gain on debt refinancing   —       (457 )     —       (457 )
    Equity-based compensation   3,498       2,845       10,349       14,540  
    Change in fair value of contingent consideration   396       732       125       2,964  
    Warranty provision   3,127       1,075       3,163       4,666  
    Write-down of inventories   442       1,844       2,923       6,431  
    Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of business acquisition:              
    Accounts receivable   (442 )     99,164       41,423       92,800  
    Inventories   (14,823 )     54,189       (44,787 )     66,743  
    Income tax receivables   33       (3,156 )     (4,112 )     9  
    Prepaid expenses and other   (24,505 )     (8,700 )     (69,708 )     (10,840 )
    Accounts payable   24,475       (52,097 )     58,180       (37,654 )
    Accrued expenses and other   34,492       (10,019 )     (436 )     5,325  
    Income tax payable   3,790       2,666       (863 )     1,936  
    Lease liabilities   (2,894 )     9,227       (8,624 )     1,177  
    Deferred revenue   8,443       (33,821 )     55,563       (111,986 )
    Net cash provided by operating activities   57,586       93,981       153,980       231,955  
    Investing activities              
    Purchase of property, plant and equipment   (1,701 )     (5,374 )     (7,305 )     (16,989 )
    Retirement/disposal of property, plant and equipment   (4 )     168       34       168  
    Cash payments for the acquisition of right-of-use assets   (11,276 )     —       (11,276 )     —  
    SAFE Investment   (3,000 )     —       (3,000 )     —  
    Sale of equity investment   —       —       11,975       —  
    Net cash used in investing activities   (15,981 )     (5,206 )     (9,572 )     (16,821 )
    Financing activities              
    Series A equity issuance costs   —       —       —       (1,509 )
    Tax withholding related to vesting of equity-based compensation   (18 )     —       (1,752 )     —  
    Proceeds from issuance of other debt   74,035       2,795       93,059       63,311  
    Principal payments on term loan facility   (1,075 )     (1,075 )     (4,300 )     (74,300 )
    Principal payments on other debt   (72,545 )     (19,039 )     (97,424 )     (88,063 )
    Contingent consideration payments   —       —       (1,427 )     (1,200 )
    Net cash used in financing activities   397       (17,319 )     (11,844 )     (101,761 )
    Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalent balances   (10,233 )     3,614       (17,503 )     1,806  
    Net change in cash and cash equivalents   31,769       75,070       115,061       115,179  
    Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash, beginning of period   332,372       174,010       249,080       133,901  
    Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of period $ 364,141     $ 249,080     $ 364,141     $ 249,080  
                   
    Supplemental cash flow information              
    Cash paid for interest $ 8,989     $ 8,995     $ 38,655     $ 43,949  
    Cash paid for income taxes (net of refunds) $ 2,746     $ 9,145     $ 27,966     $ 45,942  
                   
    Non-cash investing and financing              
    Dividends accrued on Series A $ (13,668 )   $ 6,803     $ 7,246     $ 26,370  
    Array Technologies, Inc.
    Adjusted Gross Profit, Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted Net Income, General and Administrative Expense, and Free Cash Flow Reconciliation (unaudited)
    (in thousands, except per share amounts)
     

    The following table reconciles Gross profit to Adjusted gross profit:

      Three Months Ended
    December 31,
      Year Ended
    December 31,
        2024       2023       2024       2023  
    Revenue   275,232       341,615       915,807       1,576,551  
    Cost of revenue   196,913       257,386       618,130       1,161,000  
    Gross profit   78,319       84,229       297,677       415,551  
    Gross margin   28.5 %     24.7 %     32.5 %     26.4 %
                   
    Amortization of developed technology   3,640       3,640       14,558       14,558  
    Adjusted gross profit   81,959       87,869       312,235       430,109  
    Adjusted gross margin   29.8 %     25.7 %     34.1 %     27.3 %
     

    The following table reconciles Net income to Adjusted EBITDA:

      Three Months Ended
    December 31,
      Year Ended
    December 31,
        2024       2023       2024       2023  
    Net (loss) income $ (126,903 )   $ 19,342     $ (240,394 )   $ 137,240  
    Preferred dividends and accretion   14,338       13,332       55,670       51,691  
    Net (loss) income to common shareholders $ (141,241 )   $ 6,010     $ (296,064 )   $ 85,549  
    Other expense, net   (4,746 )     (1,318 )     (15,769 )     (7,315 )
    Foreign currency loss (gain), net   3,442       326       4,515       53  
    Preferred dividends and accretion   14,338       13,332       55,670       51,691  
    Interest expense   9,007       8,857       34,825       44,229  
    Income tax (benefit) expense   (23,146 )     3,013       (10,182 )     39,917  
    Depreciation expense   1,140       772       4,410       2,669  
    Amortization of intangibles   8,142       9,186       33,811       37,607  
    Amortization of developed technology   3,640       3,640       14,558       14,558  
    Equity-based compensation   3,498       2,648       10,349       14,578  
    Change in fair value of contingent consideration   396       732       125       2,964  
    Long-lived assets impairment   91,904       —       91,904       —  
    Goodwill impairment   74,000       —       236,000       —  
    Certain legal expenses(a)   2,240       244       6,773       898  
    Other costs(b)   2,586       736       2,628       736  
    Adjusted EBITDA $ 45,200     $ 48,178     $ 173,553     $ 288,134  
     

    (a) Represents certain legal fees and other related costs associated with (i) Actions filed against the company and certain officers and directors alleging violations of the Securities Exchange Acts of 1934 and 1933, which litigation was dismissed with prejudice by the Court on May 19, 2023 and subsequently appealed. The appeal has been fully briefed, argued, and the Company is awaiting a decision, and (ii) legal and success fees related to a regional tax dispute for a period prior to the acquisition of STI, and (iii) other litigation and legal matters. We consider these costs not representative of legal costs that we will incur from time to time in the ordinary course of our business.

    (b) For the three months ended December 31, 2024, other costs represent costs related to the settlement of a regional tax dispute for a period prior to the acquisition of STI. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2024, other costs also include costs related to Capped-Call accounting treatment evaluation and the settlement of a regional tax dispute. For the three months ended December 31, 2023, other costs represent costs related to Capped-Call accounting treatment evaluation.

    The following table reconciles Net income to Adjusted net income:

      Three Months Ended
    December 31,
      Year Ended
    December 31,
        2024       2023       2024       2023  
    Net (loss) income $ (126,903 )   $ 19,342     $ (240,394 )   $ 137,240  
    Preferred dividends and accretion   14,338       13,332       55,670       51,691  
    Net (loss) income to common shareholders $ (141,241 )   $ 6,010     $ (296,064 )   $ 85,549  
    Amortization of intangibles   8,142       9,187       33,811       37,607  
    Amortization of developed technology   3,640       3,640       14,558       14,558  
    Amortization of debt discount and issuance costs   1,547       1,447       6,199       10,570  
    Preferred accretion   7,093       6,528       27,510       25,320  
    Equity based compensation   3,498       2,648       10,349       14,578  
    Change in fair value of contingent consideration   396       732       125       2,964  
    Impairment of long-lived assets   91,904       —       91,904       —  
    Goodwill impairment   74,000       —       236,000       —  
    Certain legal expenses(a)   2,240       244       6,773       898  
    Other costs(b)   2,586       736       2,628       736  
    Income tax expense adjustments(c)   (28,688 )     (4,757 )     (42,596 )     (20,863 )
    Adjusted net income $ 25,117     $ 26,415     $ 91,197     $ 171,917  
                   
    (Loss) income per common share              
    Basic $ (0.93 )   $ 0.04     $ (1.95 )   $ 0.57  
    Diluted $ (0.93 )   $ 0.04     $ (1.95 )   $ 0.56  
    Weighted average number of common shares outstanding              
    Basic   151,944       151,175       151,754       150,942  
    Diluted   151,944       152,110       151,754       152,022  
                   
    Adjusted net income per common share              
    Basic $ 0.17     $ 0.17     $ 0.60     $ 1.14  
    Diluted $ 0.16     $ 0.17     $ 0.60     $ 1.13  
    Weighted average number of common shares outstanding              
    Basic   151,944       151,175       151,754       150,942  
    Diluted   152,255       152,110       152,285       152,022  
     

    (a) Represents certain legal fees and other related costs associated with (i) Actions filed against the company and certain officers and directors alleging violations of the Securities Exchange Acts of 1934 and 1933, which litigation was dismissed with prejudice by the Court on May 19, 2023 and subsequently appealed. The appeal has been fully briefed, argued, and the Company is awaiting a decision, and (ii) legal and success fees related to a regional tax dispute for a period prior to the acquisition of STI and (iii) other litigation and legal matters. We consider these costs not representative of legal costs that we will incur from time to time in the ordinary course of our business.

    (b) For the three months ended December 31, 2024, other costs represent costs related to the settlement of a regional tax dispute for a period prior to the acquisition of STI. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2024, other costs also include costs related to Capped-Call accounting treatment evaluation and the settlement of a tax dispute. For the three months ended December 31, 2023, other costs represent costs related to Capped-Call accounting treatment evaluation.

    (c) Represents the estimated tax impact of all Adjusted Net Income add-backs, excluding those which represent permanent differences between book versus tax.

    The following table reconciles General and administrative expense to Adjusted general and administrative expense:

           
      Three Months Ended
    December 31,
      Year Ended
    December 31,
        2024       2023       2024       2023  
    General and administrative expense   45,663       43,710       160,567       159,535  
    Equity based compensation   3,498       2,648       10,349       14,578  
    Certain legal expenses(a)   2,240       244       6,773       898  
    Other costs(b)   2,586       736       2,628       736  
    Income tax expense adjustments(c)   (28,688 )     (4,757 )     (42,596 )     (20,863 )
    Adjusted general and administrative expense   25,299       42,581       137,721       154,884  
     

    (a) Represents certain legal fees and other related costs associated with (i) Actions filed against the company and certain officers and directors alleging violations of the Securities Exchange Acts of 1934 and 1933, which litigation was dismissed with prejudice by the Court on May 19, 2023 and subsequently appealed. The appeal has been fully briefed, argued, and the Company is awaiting a decision, and (ii) legal and success fees related to a regional tax dispute for a period prior to the acquisition of STI and (iii) other litigation and legal matters. We consider these costs not representative of legal costs that we will incur from time to time in the ordinary course of our business.

    (b) For the three months ended December 31, 2024, other costs represent costs related to the settlement of a regional tax dispute for a period prior to the acquisition of STI. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2024, other costs also include costs related to Capped-Call accounting treatment evaluation and the settlement of a tax dispute. For the Three months ended December 31, 2023, other costs represent costs related to Capped-Call accounting treatment evaluation.

    (c) Represents the estimated tax impact of all Adjusted Net Income add-backs, excluding those which represent permanent differences between book versus tax.

    The following table reconciles new cash provided by operating activities to Free cash flow:

      Three Months Ended
    December 31,
      Year Ended
    December 31,
        2024       2023       2024       2023  
    Net cash provided by operating activities   57,586       93,981       153,980       231,955  
    Purchase of property, plant and equipment   (1,701 )     (5,374 )     (7,305 )     (16,989 )
    Cash payments for the acquisition of right-of-use assets   (11,276 )     —       (11,276 )     —  
    Free cash flow   44,609       88,607       135,399       214,966  

    The MIL Network –

    February 28, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: UConn’s Visiting Externships for Students Underrepresented in Medicine (VESUM) and its Students are Thriving

    Source: US State of Connecticut

    Dr. Edison Martinez Monegro, 28, hails from San Juan, Puerto Rico where he attended the University of Puerto Rico San Juan Bautista School of Medicine. He is thriving in Connecticut at UConn School of Medicine as he completes his third year of general surgery residency training.

    He credits his residency success thanks to the growing Visiting Externships for Students Underrepresented in Medicine (VESUM) program at UConn School of Medicine and its strong mentorship.

    UConn School of Medicine general surgery resident Dr. Edison Martinez Monegro (Courtesy of Edison).

    He was just the second medical student in the new and growing VESUM program to match in a UConn residency. So far over forty students have visited UConn for externships over the past 8 years and eight have successfully matched to UConn for residency.

    Surgical resident Dr. Edison Martinez Monegro at UConn John Dempsey Hospital (Tina Encarnacion/UConn Health Photo).

    The VESUM program was founded and is directed by UConn’s Dr. Linda Barry, a recent recipient of the nation’s highest honor for mentorship from the President of the United States. VESUM is increasing diversity in academic medicine by offering externships to fourth-year medical students from groups underrepresented in medicine. It gives medical students a four-week insider’s view to various medical specialty fields and UConn Health before they choose their residency match.

    “Edison hails from Puerto Rico and has worked diligently to come to UConn and succeed as a surgical resident,” says Barry, professor of Surgery and Public Health Sciences at UConn School of Medicine, associate dean of Office of Multicultural and Community Affairs and associate director of the UConn Health Disparities Institute. “He is the second VESUM student to match and the first student to match for surgery at UConn Health.  Edison truly reflects the community we serve. I know the patients he cares for appreciate his genuine dedication and commitment.”

    Martinez Monegro first learned about the VESUM program as a third-year medical student while at the University of Puerto Rico through an email his dean shared about the UConn summer scholarship rotation opportunity.

    Martinez Monegro in his native Puerto Rico (Photo Courtesy of Edison).

    “I applied to VESUM, and I received a letter from Dr. Barry telling me she wanted to meet with me, and I was accepted. I was super excited!” said Martinez Monegro who had his UConn VESUM externship as a rising fourth year medical student within the Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery at UConn Health working closely with its faculty such as Chief Dr. Kwame Amankwah and Dr. Mina Boutros. “It was a very good experience. I learned a lot I didn’t know. The UConn rotation allowed for me to have greater exposure to the field of surgery and learn more about UConn too. I also met the residency program director and even the dean of the medical school. Most importantly, I got to see other current UConn residents in action.”

    He adds, “The VESUM program really prepared me for my residency. And, UConn, it just felt right for me. UConn was at the top of my list for my residency. I was excited when I got the call that I matched to UConn for general surgery.”

    “I made the right choice of coming to UConn,” he says heartwarmingly.  “Surgery residency is hard. You want the people around you to help you and make you feel at home. UConn does that. Dr. Barry has been amazing.”

    Puerto Rico, its culture, and its people are very important to Martinez Monegro.

    “Every year there are less and less physicians in Puerto Rico,” stresses Martinez Monegro, who attended as an undergraduate the University of Puerto Rico and its medical school too. “My first goal was to become a doctor to help with that shortage.”

    He was inspired to go into the surgery field also by the shows he saw on TV.

    At his White Coat Ceremony Dr. Martinez Monegro with his parents (Photo Courtesy of Edison).

    “I was always captivated by the surgeries in TV shows. As a senior in high school I shadowed a surgeon for a full day in the OR. Spending the day, tucked into the corner of the OR, I was amazed by it all. I thought I could work here. The OR felt like home. Surgery I realized is what I have to do.”

    Also, he says the Hartford area really does have it all. The Puerto Rican people of Hartford are at the heart of Martinez Monegro’s love of Connecticut too.

    “What I like about my residency at UConn is that we rotate though a mix of academic and community hospitals,” he says about the five area hospitals of UConn John Dempsey Hospital, Hartford Hospital, Connecticut Children’s, St. Francis Hospital, and Hospital of Central Connecticut.  “Hartford’s population is 40 percent Puerto Rican. I want to be able to practice medicine in a place where I can serve my people and speak my language of Spanish while at work.”

    Martinez Monegro believes a VESUM externship rotation experience is a great way to visit and learn more about a medical or surgical field and also UConn Health just like he did.

    “I learned the OR is where I like to be. It’s a long day, but I love learning, the responsibility of caring for our patients, and working with the UConn medical team. I am motivated every day to keep helping patients,” he says.

    UConn resident Dr. Edison Martinez Monegro with his parents in Puerto Rico (Photo Courtesy of Edison).

    He also applauds UConn School of Medicine for its longstanding work of diversifying the future health care workforce.

    “UConn has done an excellent job of diversifying medicine. We have residents of all different backgrounds in our residency programs,” Martinez Monegro. “For example, I speak Spanish, so my colleagues ask me for help translating for their patients sometimes. When I need help, funny enough I first ask my fellow residents to translate for me in their languages ranging from Russian to Arabic.”

    Dr. Edison Martinez Monegro (Tina Encarnacion/UConn Health Photo).

    His message to those applying to residency or in the thick of residency: “Enjoy what you do! Try to find new learning opportunities in everything you do!”

    MIL OSI USA News –

    February 28, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Illegal alien from Mexico sentenced to 27 months in federal prison, following US Immigration and Customs Enforcement investigation

    Source: US Immigration and Customs Enforcement

    BOISE — Jose Salvador Alcaraz-Curiel, 31, an illegal alien from Mexico, was sentenced to 27 months in federal prison for being a deported alien found in the United States, following a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement investigation, Feb. 24, 2025.

    According to court records, Alcaraz-Curiel was previously removed from the U.S. in October 2018 and September 2020.

    “This conviction underscores the dedication of ICE Homeland Security Investigations special agents in safeguarding our nation’s laws,” said ICE HSI Seattle acting Special Agent in Charge Matthew Murphy. “By holding individuals accountable for illegally reentering the United States, we emphasize the vital role of immigration enforcement in protecting the safety and security of our communities. We remain fully committed to enforcing immigration laws to safeguard the American public.”

    After his second removal, Alcaraz-Curiel again reentered the United States illegally and without lawful authority. ICE encountered Alcaraz-Curiel in Canyon County in March 2024. Alcaraz-Curiel has history of state misdemeanor and felony convictions in Idaho, as well as a 2020 federal conviction in the District of Arizona for being a deported alien found in the United States.

    Acting U.S. Attorney Whatcott commended the efforts of ICE for their work on this case. Assistant U.S. Attorney Francis J. Zebari prosecuted this case.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    February 28, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Security: Guatemalan National Indicted for Illegal Reentry

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    BOSTON – A Guatemalan national was indicted today for unlawfully reentering the United States after deportation.

    Domingo Valentin Solis-De Leon, 29, was charged with one count of unlawful reentry of a deported alien. Solis-De Leon was arrested on Jan. 28, 2025 in Lynn, Mass. and was subsequently taken into custody by immigration authorities. Solis-De Leon was indicted this morning and will make an initial appearance in federal court in Boston later.

    The charge of unlawful reentry of a deported alien provides for a sentence of up to 20 years in prison, three years of supervised release and a fine of up to $250,000. The defendant will be subject to deportation upon completion of any sentence imposed. Sentences are imposed by a federal district court judge based upon the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and statutes which govern the determination of a sentence in a criminal case.

    United States Attorney Leah B. Foley and Patricia H. Hyde, Field Office Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s Enforcement and Removal Operations in Boston made the announcement. Assistant U.S. Attorney Luke A. Goldworm of the Major Crimes Unit is prosecuting the case.

    The details contained in the charging documents are allegations. The defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.
     

    MIL Security OSI –

    February 28, 2025
←Previous Page
1 … 245 246 247 248 249 … 358
Next Page→
NewzIntel.com

NewzIntel.com

MIL Open Source Intelligence

  • Blog
  • About
  • FAQs
  • Authors
  • Events
  • Shop
  • Patterns
  • Themes

Twenty Twenty-Five

Designed with WordPress