Category: Latin America

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Coventry honours Holocaust Memorial Day and marks the 80th anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz-Birkenau

    Source: City of Coventry

    The people of Coventry came together this week (27 January) to honour the annual Holocaust Memorial Day, which this year fell on the 80th anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz-Birkenau.

    The event was held at the Belgrade Theatre, and a large audience heard from city leaders and guest speakers, as well as schoolchildren and students from the city. 
     
    Cllr Abdul Salam Khan, Deputy Leader of Coventry City Council, hosted the service, with speeches from Lord Mayor, Cllr Mal Mutton and Council Chief Executive, Julie Nugent.  
     
    The main speaker was Lesley Urbach, from Generation 2 Generation, a Holocaust education charity, who told the story of her mother Eva Urbach and aunt Ulli Adler, who escaped to Britain and Argentina in 1938 and 1939.  
     
    The talk focused on what happened to their parents left behind in Germany, who were murdered at Auschwitz. 
     
    There was also a performance by actors from Time Will Tell Theatre, who enacted first-hand accounts of the liberation of Bergen-Belsen, which will also mark its 80th anniversary this year. 
     
    The audience also heard music from Coventry Music Brass Quintet and Bluecoat School Choir, readings from students from the University of Warwick, and pupils from Cardinal Newman Catholic School talked about their personal experiences of conflict and the importance of learning about the Holocaust. 
     
    A candle was lit as the city remembered the victims of the Holocaust and other genocides including Cambodia, Rwanda, Bosnia, Darfur, Afghanistan and Syria. 

    This year’s theme was ‘For a Better Future’, and Cllr Khan told the audience: “It is something our city works for continually, both here at home, and around the world, and it is a call for action that we can all be a part of. 

    “There are many things we can do to create a better future. We can speak out and stand up for others and we can challenge prejudice. We can learn from our past and from the Holocaust, genocides, and wars, and we can tell our stories and remember those we have lost to hatred and prejudice – as we do today. 
     
    “If we can all leave here with the determination to take one action or change one thing, then together, we can make a difference and help to build that better future.” 
     

    To learn more about HMD, visit the website

    Published: Wednesday, 29th January 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI Banking: Cannabis users’ consumption behavior and product choices are different from other consumers, presenting a key knowledge gap for food and beverages brand strategy, according to new GlobalData study

    Source: GlobalData

    The study looks at how the use of cannabis is impacting consumption in key food and beverage categories in key markets.

    GlobalData’s new “Hot Topics” cannabis study on the claimed consumption behavior of cannabis users compared to non-users highlights that this is a large and growing consumer group, who are behaving differently to the general population, in ways that brand owners and their stakeholders may not fully realise.

    Jenny Questier, Consumer Analysis Director at GlobalData, commented: “Currently, there is little research data or analysis available to help companies understand the impact of a new cohort of cannabis users in consumer packaged goods markets where the drug has been legalized. While this study’s findings are indicative, they could apply to any market where cannabis use is prevalent as they do provide some useful insights into the impact that cannabis users consumption behavior could have on product choices being made in key food and beverage categories and which demographics are important in future product development and positioning.”

    The study entitled, Hot Topics Report: Impact of cannabis use on consumption in key markets, provides a top-line indication of how consumers who claim to use cannabis, describe their use of the drug in five key markets which have legalized the recreational use of the cannabis, namely: the US, South Africa, Canada, Mexico and Germany, and the claimed impact this may have on consumer consumption in the alcoholic drinks, non-alcoholic drinks, savory snacks, and chocolate and confectionary categories in each of these markets.

    The study reveals that cannabis users have a tendency to stay at home more, are more concerned about their physical and mental health, spend more time online, and perhaps as a consequence of this, order more food online, when compared to non-cannabis users. Interestingly, the known side effects of cannabis use of increasing hunger and thirst are significantly impacting on consumers’ net consumption of non-alcoholic beverages, savory snacks and chocolate and confectionary, however, the drug’s use currently seems to have a limited impact on alcohol consumption overall.

    This is an important cohort for consumer packaged goods companies because the number of recreational cannabis users is already significant and is set to grow further. In the US, cannabis is legal for recreational use in 24 out of 50 states, according to the *Pew Research Centre. In the US, there were an estimated 17.7 million daily cannabis users recorded in 2022, according to research published in the journal Addiction, based on data collected by the National Survey on Drug Use and Health.

    Questier continued, “In the coming decade, the number of cannabis users is set to grow globally as more US states are likely to legalize recreational cannabis use, public support may lead more countries to do the same, and more people are likely to take up the habit as a means of relaxation, enjoyment, and for perceived health benefits. It is imperative that brands and manufacturers of food and beverages understand what this may mean for future innovation and target consumer groups.”

    Here are some of the top-line indicative findings from the study for each food and beverages category surveyed in each market:

    Alcoholic and Non-alcoholic Drinks

    Cannabis use does not appear to have a significant impact on alcoholic drinks sales!

    Claimed alcohol consumption remains largely unchanged overall as a result of cannabis use, generally holding steady at a plus or minus 1% net change in most markets. Canada and Mexico have a small net decline in alcohol consumption with Germany’s high +10% net change attributed to a smaller sample size as cannabis has only recently been legalized in the country, and reported use remains relatively low.

    An assumption that alcohol sales overall might suffer from the increased use of cheaper cannabis products as the stimulant effects are similar is not evident from this study. However, that’s not to say that the alcoholic drinks market isn’t changing; female cannabis users are drinking less alcohol, but males are drinking more.

    Cannabis use makes you thirsty for non-alcoholic drinks!

    All markets in this study saw a significant rise in the consumption of non-alcoholic drinks by cannabis users. In some markets, this rise occurred among all demographics, in other markets younger consumers dominated.

    Savory Snacks and Chocolate & Confectionary

    Cannabis use gives you the munchies, boosting savory snacks sales!

    All markets saw a rise in savory snack consumption due to cannabis use; North American markets had particularly large rises. Unlike beverages, Gen Z do not dominate savory snack sales, instead it is older Gen Y and Gen X consumers.

    Cannabis use gives you a sweet tooth, increasing chocolate & confectionery sales!

    Cannabis use drives a significant rise in chocolate and confectionery consumption in most markets, although the demographic leading this varies from market to market.

    Questier adds: “The top-line results from this indicative study show that cannabis users’ consumption behavior is different from other consumers. Consumption of soft drinks, savory snacks and chocolate and confectionery is significantly increased, with the balance between male and female, and young and old consumers shifting in each market. Whilst there is limited claimed impact from cannabis users on total alcohol consumption, the demographic make-up of this market is nevertheless changed by the presence of cannabis.

    “With little research conducted into this area to date, the study’s indicative findings suggest that the implications of cannabis use for consumer packaged goods companies and their stakeholders could be significant for brand strategy, consumer targeting, portfolio management, innovation, sales, advertising, and marketing. Further research by brand, category, and geography could be required to ensure that these implications are understood and appropriate strategies devised to manage them.”

    Free sample pages from the “Hot Topics Report: Impact of cannabis use on consumption in key markets”, are available here

    * Source: Pew Research Centre: here

    GlobalData Consumer Custom Solutions offers sector-level expertise in the Consumer Packaged GoodsFood, Beverages, Foodservice, Retail, Apparel, Packaging, Agribusiness, and Automotive industries. We use our unique data, insights and analytics to answer your bespoke questions with a tailored approach and deliverables.​ To learn more about this press release or have a chat, please drop us an email consulting@globaldata.com or contact us here and we’ll get in touch!

    MIL OSI Global Banks

  • MIL-OSI USA: Video: Kaine Speaks on Senate Floor Regarding Trump’s Pardons of Individuals Found Guilty of Assaulting Police Officers on January 6, 2021

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Virginia Tim Kaine

    BROADCAST-QUALITY VIDEO IS AVAILABLE HERE.
    WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, U.S. Senator Tim Kaine (D-VA) spoke on the Senate floor in opposition to President Trump’s pardons of individuals who were found guilty of assaulting police officers during the January 6, 2021 attack on the Capitol. Kaine and his colleagues sought unanimous consent to pass their resolution condemning these pardons, but its passage was blocked by Senate Republicans. During Kaine’s floor speech, he also highlighted the five Virginia law enforcement officers who tragically lost their lives after defending the Capitol on that day, including Howie Liebengood.
    A full transcript of Kaine’s speech as delivered is available below:
    Mr. President.
    I rise together with my colleagues to speak in opposition to the President’s action pardoning those who attacked this Capitol on January 6, 2021. I was here that day. I shared that day with these colleagues, and we all have memories of it—memories that we never would have imagined and hope never to repeat.
    But I’m not going to talk about my experiences of the day.
    I’m going to talk about a friend, a Virginian, Howie Liebengood, a Capitol Police Officer who spent his career protecting this building and who died as a result of that day. And the fact that President Trump would pardon the people who attacked this Capitol leading to Howie Liebengood’s death is a deep, deep stain to President Trump and frankly a stain on this body if we casually tolerate it.
    Howie Liebengood is a Virginian who grew up in this building. His father was the Sergeant at Arms of the United States Senate and prior to assuming that role, worked in other roles in the Senate. And Howie and his two siblings grew up coming to the capitol and treating it like it was sort of their playground and their yard, running through the halls, meeting senators, hearing their dad tell stories about what it was like to serve this Article I branch as a patriotic American public servant.
    When Howie came of age, he started a career that he enjoyed and worked together with his father for a number of years as a NASCAR driver. And he worked on the NASCAR circuit—kind of working his way up from minor league races to more significant races.
    But after a number of years of doing that—look, he was a child of the United States Senate, he was a child of this Capitol—and he decided he would enter the training program to be a Capitol Police Officer. And he told his siblings—by this time, his father had passed—I think my dad would be very, very proud of me.
    Howie went through the Academy and became a Capitol Police Officer, and I came to know him—as I suspect many of my colleagues did—because he usually was staffing the Delaware door at the corner of Delaware and Constitution right here—the Delaware door to the Russell building. And this a door that I know Senator Murray’s office is right close to that door—maybe the closest office to that door and mine is close as well. We would come in in the morning, and Howie Liebengood would be there to greet us, to ask questions about the procedural vote from the night before or what was on today.
    As much as he was a friend to mine, he was even more of a friend to my staff. My staff loved interacting with Howie, and he eventually served as a Capitol Police Officer for 15 years.
    He was here on January 6 when his beloved Capitol was attacked. And as devastating as that attack was for many of us, for Howie—who had made this place his whole life, who had really been raised in these halls—that attack was very devastating.
    In the aftermath of the attack, those working on the Capitol Police were put on extended hours—little sleep. Would there be more attacks? Where was this going? What would happen? It was a time of fear and anxiety and confusion.
    And a few days later, within three days after that attack of January 6, Howie went to his home in Virginia. His wife Serena asked if he was doing okay. She could tell he was under enormous stress, and he said he just needed to sleep. And Howie went upstairs and using his own service revolver, ended his life.
    Howie Liebengood would be alive today if President Trump hadn’t urged people to gather to do something wild in Washington, D.C. on January 6, 2021 and then urged those gathering to go up and raise hell at the Capitol.
    My friend would be alive if President Trump had not done what he did.
    I’ve waited in vain, not naively, but with a hope that there might be some sign of remorse over what happened—for the pain suffered by Serena Liebengood and Howie’s siblings and family members.
    Four other law enforcement officers, all of whom lived in Virginia, lost their life as a result of that day. Dozens of others were injured.
    And I have waited for years to see if there might be some semblance of remorse shown by the president who inspired that attack, for the damage and pain and loss of life and injury that he’s caused, and I’ve seen not a shred of it.
    But these pardons are the ultimate injustice, are the ultimate injury. The family’s still suffering. For them, it’s salt in an unhealed wound and an injury that will never heal.
    And so I join with my colleagues in Howie’s memory, in support of Serena, in support of Howie’s family, to stand on this floor and deplore as strongly as I can—and words aren’t sufficient to really explain how I feel about this—but I stand here to deplore as strongly as I can the pardons of these law breakers who gathered for a particular time at a particular moment in a particular place to conduct violence in the cause of a particular result, the overturning of the peaceful transfer of power.
    And as I sit down, Mr. President, I’ll just say this.
    I lived in a military dictatorship in 1980 and 81 in Honduras when the military ran everything. I know what authoritarianism is. I didn’t live there for years like my Honduran friends, but I experienced it.
    I was very naive. I was 22 years old when I lived there, and I saw what it’s like to have a society run by somebody who believes they are all powerful, who can change any rule, who can foment violence, who can make sure that those who commit violence escape with impunity.
    I know what this is like, and we are in danger of moving into the same kind of authoritarian behavior when we casually pardon and excuse those who perpetrate violence to overturn our democracy.
    That’s a big concept, but it all comes down to the effect that it has on individual people like my friend Howie Liebengood.
    And with that, Mr. President, I yield the floor.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-Evening Report: PSNA’s Minto hits back at Gaza ‘genocide hotline’ critics, insists NZ should deny Israeli soldier visas

    Asia Pacific Report

    A national Palestine advocacy group has hit back at critics of its “genocide hotline” campaign against soldiers involved in Israel’s war against Gaza, saying New Zealand should be actively following international law.

    The Palestine Solidarity Network Aotearoa (PSNA) dismissed a “predictable lineup of apologists for Israel” for their criticisms of the PSNA campaign.

    “Why is concern for the sensitivities of soldiers from a genocidal Israeli campaign more important than condemning the genocide itself?,” asked PSNA national chair John Minto in a statement.

    The Minister of Foreign Affairs Winston Peters, the Chief Human Rights Commissioner Stephen Rainbow and the New Zealand Jewish Council have made statements “protecting” Israeli soldiers who come to New Zealand on “rest and recreation” from the industrial-scale killing of 47,000 Palestinians in Gaza until a truce went into force on January 19.

    “We are not surprised to see such a predictable lineup of apologists for Israel and its genocide in Gaza from lining up to attack a PSNA campaign with false smears of anti-semitism,” Minto said.

    He said that over 16 months Peters had done “absolutely nothing” to put any pressure on Israel to end its genocidal behaviour.

    “But he is full of bluff and bluster and outright lies to denounce those who demand Israel be held to account.”

    Deny illegal settler visas
    Minto said that if Peters was doing his job as Foreign Minister, he would not only stop Israeli soldiers coming to Aotearoa New Zealand — as with Russian soldiers in the Ukraine war — he would also deny visas to any Israeli with an address in an illegal Israeli settlement in the Occupied Palestinian Territories.

    The Human Rights Commission had issued a “disingenuous media release”, he said.

    “Our campaign has nothing to do with Israelis or Jews — it is a campaign to stop Israeli soldiers coming here for rest and recreation after a campaign of wholesale killing of Palestinians in Gaza,” Minto said.

    “To imply the campaign is targeting Jews is disgusting and despicable.

    “Some of the soldiers will be Druse, some Palestinian Arabs and others will be Jews.”

    The five-year-old Palestinian girl Hind Rajab, shot 355 times by Israeli soldiers on 29 January 2024. Image: @Onlyloren/Instagram

    Israeli soldiers are facing a growing risk of being arrested abroad for alleged war crimes committed in Gaza, with around 50 criminal complaints filed so far in courts in several countries around the world.

    Earlier this month, a former Israeli soldier abruptly ended his holiday in Brazil and was “smuggled” out of the country after a Federal Court ordered police to open a war crimes investigation against him. The man fled to Argentina.

    A complaint lodged by the Belgium-based Hind Rajab Foundation (HRF) included more than 500 pages of court records linking the suspect to the demolition of civilian homes in Gaza.

    ‘Historic’ court ruling against soldier
    The foundation called the Brazilian court’s decision “historic”, saying it marked a significant precedent for a member country of the International Criminal Court (ICC) to enforce Rome Statute provisions domestically in the 15-month Israeli war on Gaza.

    The foundation is named in honour of five-year-old Palestinian girl Hind Rajab who was killed on 29 January 2024 by Israel soldiers while pleading for help in a car after her six family members were dead.

    According to The New Arab, the foundation has so far tracked and sent the names of 1000 Israeli soldiers to the ICC and Interpol, and has been pursuing legal cases in a number of countries, including Belgium, Brazil, Cyprus, France, Thailand, Sri Lanka, Thailand, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom.

    In November, the ICC issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defence Minister Yoav Gallant, together with a former Hamas commander, citing allegations of war crimes and crimes against humanity.

    Minto accused the New Zealand Jewish Council of being “deeply racist” and said it regularly “makes a meal of false smears of anti-semitism”.

    “It’s deeply problematic that this Jewish Council strategy takes attention away from the real anti-semitism which exists in New Zealand and around the world.

    “The priority of the Jewish Council is to protect Israel from criticism and protect it from accountability for its apartheid policies, ethnic cleansing and genocide.

    “We are demanding that accountability.”

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI USA: January 28th, 2025 VIDEO: Heinrich Delivers Remarks on the Senate Floor Slamming Trump’s Unlawful Federal Funding Blockade

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for New Mexico Martin Heinrich
    WASHINGTON – U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.) took to the Senate floor this evening to condemn President Trump’s unlawful unilateral blockade of all federal grant funding. In his remarks, Heinrich underscored the magnitude of damage this unlawful decision has already wrought on the lives of thousands of New Mexicans, highlighting the harm and chaos it has created in communities across the state.
    Heinrich also pointed to the illegality of this action, citing the law that Congress passed — the Impoundment Control Act of 1974 — after President Richard Nixon tried to withhold Congressionally appropriated funds.

    U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.) delivers remarks on the Senator floor slamming President Trump’s unlawful unilateral blockade of all federal grant funding, January 28, 2025.
    “In an overnight maneuver that would make a dictator envious, President Trump unlawfully and unilaterally froze all federal grant funding. He shut down the housing portal that non-profits and Tribes use to access mortgage financing. He literally shut down the Medicaid reimbursement portal. He threw every town, county, Tribe, nonprofit, health care provider, school, and preschool into total disarray. From our state’s Roundhouse to the classroom to the emergency room, today was chaos. And people want answers,” said Heinrich.
    “The president cannot override, delay, or rescind Congress’s funding laws. Full stop. This has been upheld time and again by the Supreme Court, the Department of Justice, the Government Accountability Office, and by the law, specifically the Impoundment Control Act of 1974,” continued Heinrich. “As a member of the Senate Appropriations Committee, I know how much work goes in to writing and passing our bipartisan funding laws. And I am not going to cede that to ANY administration to be abused.”
    Heinrich called on New Mexicans to share how Trump’s blockade is affecting themselves and their families, “I want to hear from you about Donald Trump’s blockade, and how it is affecting you and your family. If your town’s COPS grant gets frozen, I need to know. If your VA mortgage gets held up, I need to know. If you’re a nonprofit giving services in the areas of violence against women, refuges for people who are battered, and your funding gets held up, these are the stories that I think need to be held up to understand just what is happening in our country right now.”
    Heinrich concluded by calling on his colleagues, “Let’s make sure that whatever we agree to here in this amazing Capitol—that not only passes both chambers but gets signed into law by the President of the United States—that we abide by that. Because only if we all agree to color inside the lines, and act like a democracy, will this remain a democracy.”
    Earlier today, Heinrich also released a statement condemning President Trump’s unlawful direction to unilaterally block all federal grant funding.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI United Nations: Lieutenant General Ulisses De Mesquita Gomes of Brazil – Force Commander of the United Nations Organization Stabilization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (MONUSCO)

    Source: United Nations MIL-OSI 2

    nited Nations Secretary-General António Guterres announced today the appointment of Lieutenant General Ulisses De Mesquita Gomes of Brazil as Force Commander of the United Nations Organization Stabilization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (MONUSCO).

    Lieutenant General Gomes succeeds Acting Force Commander Major General Khar Diouf of Senegal, to whom the Secretary-General is grateful for his dedication and service.

    Lieutenant General Gomes brings to the position 35 years of experience in crisis response, conflict management and peacekeeping.  He has both operational and strategic expertise as well as diplomatic experience.  His last position was with his national military, where he served as Deputy Chief of Army Logistics Command.  Prior to that, he was the Brazilian Military Attaché to the United States of America.

    He previously served as the 7th Infantry Brigade Commander in Brazil, the Defence Adviser of the Minister of Strategic Affairs of the Brazilian Government and the Chief of Planning and Operations of the 11th Infantry Brigade.  His international experience includes his deployment with the United Nations Stabilization Mission in Haiti (MINUSTAH) (2008-2009) and his appointment as the Chief of the Current Military Operations Service and Policy & Doctrine Team in the Office of Military Affairs of the UN Department of Peace Operations (2017-2019).
     
    Lieutenant General Gomes holds a bachelor’s degree in law from the Federal University, Brazil, and a master’s degree in military science and law from the Brazilian Army Staff College. He is fluent in English, French, Portuguese and Spanish.

    MIL OSI United Nations News

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Moscow enterprises will take part in 30 foreign exhibitions with the support of Mospromtsentr

    Translartion. Region: Russians Fedetion –

    Source: Moscow Metro

    This year, Moscow-based export-oriented companies will have more opportunities to communicate with foreign partners: the MosProm center will organize 25 international business missions and ensure participation in 5 major international exhibitions. These initiatives, which include both face-to-face and virtual meetings, will provide Moscow manufacturers with important platforms for negotiations with foreign partners, said Maxim Liksutov, Deputy Mayor of Moscow for Transport and Industry.

    Tastes of Moscow.

    On behalf of Sergei Sobyanin, the city prioritizes supporting export-oriented enterprises in expanding their presence in global markets. Our main task is to increase the volume of exports of industrial goods and agricultural products of Moscow production to friendly countries. Moscow manufacturers will present their products at international exhibitions in China, Saudi Arabia, Uzbekistan and Azerbaijan. They will also hold direct negotiations with potential buyers and distributors from Mexico, the UAE, Iran, Kuwait, Jordan, Turkey, Thailand, Vietnam, India, Mongolia, African countries and the CIS, said Maxim Liksutov.

    MosProm was established in 2019 with the aim of increasing the recognition and presence of Moscow-made products in foreign markets. One of the most effective programs offered by MosProm is the buyer program. It allows companies to participate in specialized international exhibitions and business missions, where they can negotiate with potential customers of Moscow-made products in the business-to-business (B2B) and business-to-government (B2G) formats. This enables local industrial companies to expand their export scope and product range, establish new partnerships and customer relationships, and attract valuable investments.

    Tastes of Moscow.

    MosProm specialists provide comprehensive support to Moscow producers at all stages of their foreign economic activity. Thanks to MosProm’s assistance, Moscow non-raw materials and non-energy producers have successfully reoriented their export flows and found new partners in the markets of Latin America, Africa, the Middle East, Southeast Asia and the CIS, – emphasized Anatoly Garbuzov, Minister of the Moscow Government, Head of the Moscow Department of Investment and Industrial Policy.

    In addition, Moscow exporters benefit significantly from national support programs. The national project “International Cooperation and Export” is a set of measures of information, financial, insurance and logistics support. The project includes the digital platform “My Export”, which offers a range of business support services. These include free expert consultations, market analytics, assistance in promoting goods on international platforms, online training programs and much more.

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI Russia: IMF Executive Board Concludes 2024 Article IV Consultation with Bolivia

    Source: IMF – News in Russian

    January 28, 2025

    Washington, DC: On March 22nd, the Executive Board of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) concluded the Article IV consultation1 for Bolivia. This also included a discussion of the findings of the Financial Sector Assessment Program (FSAP) exercise for Bolivia.[1]

    Bolivia’s growth momentum moderated in 2023, to 2.5 percent, from declining natural gas production, less public investment, and financial market turmoil. Price controls, food and fuel subsidies, export restrictions, and strong agricultural production held inflation below 2 percent at year-end. However, the combination of lower natural gas exports, high fuel imports, a large fiscal deficit―increasingly financed by the central bank―and an overvalued exchange rate contributed to a wider current account deficit (estimated at 5 percent of GDP for 2023) and near-depletion of international reserves. Public debt increased to nearly 84 percent of GDP by end-2023. Sovereign spreads rose sharply in early 2023 as the foreign exchange (FX) shortage became apparent and a mid-sized bank (Banco Fassil) failed. Consequently, banks were forced to restrict the withdrawal of FX deposits, heightening financial sector stability risks.

    Growth is anticipated to decelerate to 1.6 percent in 2024, holding at around 2.2-2.3 percent in the medium term under the continuation of the current policies. Inflation is forecast to reach 4.5 percent in 2024, stabilizing around 4 percent thereafter. The outlook is however predicated on significantly improved access to external financing, without which the risk of disorderly fiscal and/or exchange rate adjustment is elevated. External factors such as reduced demand, intensified global conflicts disrupting trade routes, commodity price volatility, or a renewed tightening of financial conditions could worsen fiscal and external imbalances, impede growth, and destabilize the domestic financial sector.

    Additionally, extreme weather events, like the 2023 droughts and recent floods, pose a risk to Bolivia’s agricultural sector and critical infrastructure. Domestically, a faster decline in hydrocarbon production, higher inflation due to FX scarcity, or confidence shocks could further impact growth, hurt real incomes and exacerbate financial stability risks. Social unrest stemming from inequality and security concerns remains a concern, as evidenced by the prolonged road blockages of early 2024. On the upside, Bolivia could potentially benefit from the global shift towards green energy due to its vast lithium resources, although developing the lithium sector and scaling up domestic production capacity will likely take time.

    Executive Board Assessment[2]

    Executive Directors agreed with the thrust of the staff appraisal. They welcomed Bolivia’s socioeconomic progress over the past several years but expressed concerns about the difficult financial situation Bolivia currently finds itself in, with low reserves, uncertain fiscal financing, and pressures in parallel exchange markets. Directors stressed the urgency of a shift from current unsustainable policies to avoid a disorderly adjustment that would exert significant social and economic hardship.

    Directors called for continued constructive engagement on a sustainable policy mix that is likely to require both fiscal adjustment phased in over the next few years and an up front step devaluation to more quickly address the external imbalance and allow for a build up of reserves. They emphasized the importance of improving the social safety net to shield poorer households from inflation pressures following a realignment of the exchange rate. Directors also emphasized the importance of strengthening fiscal institutions to underpin the credibility of the planned adjustment and to improve central bank governance in support of a shift to a crawling peg and, eventually, to inflation targeting.

    Directors recommended a strengthening of the central banks’ capacity to conduct sterilization operations and to lift lending rate caps to improve the allocation of capital and enhance monetary policy transmission. They also underscored the need to improve crisis preparedness and contingency planning in line with FSAP recommendations to safeguard financial stability.

    Directors recommended a range of supply side reforms to unlock private investment, boost productivity and enhance competitiveness. These should include phasing out export ceilings and price controls and better prioritizing public investment projects. A stronger regulatory framework for hydrocarbon and lithium exploration could be instrumental in increasing investment in those sectors. Directors also called for enhancing AML/CFT framework and ensuring the timely publication of key macroeconomic data.

     

    Table 1. Bolivia: Selected Economic and Social Indicators, 2022–2026

    Population (millions, 2021)

    11.8

    Poverty rate (percent, 2021)

    36.3

    Population growth rate (percent, 2021)

    1.4

    Adult literacy rate (percent, 2021)

    94.8

    Life expectancy at birth (years, 2021)

    72

    GDP per capita (US$, 2021)

    3,437

    Total unemployment rate (2021)

    7.0

    IMF Quota (SDR, millions)

    240.1

    Est.

    2022

    2023

    2024

    2025

    2026

    Income and prices

    Real GDP

    3.6

    2.5

    1.6

    2.2

    2.2

    Nominal GDP

    8.9

    4.9

    6.2

    6.5

    6.2

    CPI inflation (period average)

    1.7

    2.6

    4.5

    4.2

    3.9

    CPI inflation (end of period)

    3.1

    2.1

    4.8

    4.0

    3.9

    Investment and savings 1/

    Total investment

    15.1

    15.9

    16.6

    16.3

    16.0

    Of which: Public sector

    5.7

    5.0

    6.0

    6.0

    6.0

    Gross national savings

    12.5

    8.6

    10.5

    10.3

    10.5

    Of which: Public sector

    -1.4

    -2.0

    -1.9

    -1.5

    -1.2

    Combined public sector

    Revenues and grants

    28.9

    28.3

    27.6

    27.4

    27.1

    Of which: Hydrocarbon related revenue

    6.0

    5.4

    4.3

    3.9

    3.5

    Expenditure

    36.0

    35.3

    35.5

    34.8

    34.3

    Current

    30.3

    30.3

    29.5

    28.8

    28.3

    Capital 2/

    5.7

    5.0

    6.0

    6.0

    6.0

    Net lending/borrowing (overall balance)

    -7.1

    -7.0

    -7.9

    -7.5

    -7.2

    Of which: Non-hydrocarbon balance

    -12.8

    -12.2

    -12.0

    -11.2

    -10.5

    Total gross NFPS debt 3/

    80.4

    83.6

    86.7

    88.9

    90.9

    External sector

    Current account 1/

    -0.4

    -5.0

    -5.7

    -5.8

    -5.6

    Exports of goods and services

    32.6

    28.5

    27.0

    26.9

    26.5

    Of which: Natural gas

    6.7

    3.8

    3.4

    3.0

    2.7

    Imports of goods and services

    32.9

    34.4

    33.6

    33.6

    32.7

    Capital account

    0.0

    0.0

    0.0

    0.0

    0.0

    Financial account (-= net inflow)

    -1.5

    -0.5

    -5.3

    -5.8

    -5.6

    Of which: Direct investment net

    -0.8

    -0.6

    -0.6

    -0.9

    -0.9

    Of which: Other investment, net

    -0.3

    -0.3

    -4.6

    -4.7

    -5.1

    Net errors and omissions

    -3.0

    0.0

    0.0

    0.0

    0.0

    Terms of trade index (percent change)

    -1.6

    1.2

    -0.6

    0.0

    0.2

    Central Bank gross foreign reserves 4/ 5/ 6/

    In millions of U.S. dollars

    3,796

    1,808

    1,653

    1,555

    1,556

    In months of imports of goods and services

    2.8

    1.3

    1.1

    1.0

    1.0

    In percent of GDP

    8.6

    3.9

    3.4

    3.0

    2.8

    In percent of ARA

    44.5

    20.8

    18.2

    16.2

    15.5

    Money and credit

    Credit to the private sector (percent change)

    6.3

    -0.4

    3.0

    4.3

    5.1

    Credit to the private sector (percent of GDP)

    74.2

    70.5

    68.4

    67.0

    66.3

    Broad money (percent of GDP)

    85.2

    82.8

    81.2

    80.0

    78.9

    Memorandum items:

    Nominal GDP (in billions of U.S. dollars)

    44.3

    46.5

    49.3

    52.5

    55.8

    Bolivianos/U.S. dollar (end-of-period) 7/

    6.9

    6.9

    REER, period average (percent change) 8/

    -0.9

    -1.9

    Oil prices (in U.S. dollars per barrel)

    96.4

    80.6

    77.7

    73.8

    70.9

    Energy-related subsidies to SOEs (percent of GDP) 9/

    4.4

    4.0

    3.5

    2.7

    2.4

    Sources: Bolivian authorities (MEFP, Ministry of Planning, BCB, INE, UDAPE); IMF; Fund staff calculations.
    1/ The discrepancy between the current account and the savings-investment balance reflects methodological differences. For the projection years, the discrepancy is assumed to remain constant in dollar value.
    2/ Includes nationalization costs and net lending.
    3/ Public debt includes SOE’s borrowing from the BCB (but not from other domestic institutions) and BCB loans to FINPRO and FNDR.
    4/ Excludes reserves from the Latin American Reserve Fund (FLAR) and Offshore Liquidity Requirements (RAL).
    5/ All foreign assets valued at market prices.
    6/ Includes a repurchase line of US$99.2 million maturing in 2025.
    7/ Official (buy) exchange rate.
    8/ The REER based on authorities’ methodology is different from that of the IMF (see 2018 and 2017 Staff Reports).
    9/ Includes the cost of subsidy borne by public enterprises and incentives for hydrocarbon exploration investments in the projection period.

    1 Under Article IV of the IMF’s Articles of Agreement, the IMF holds bilateral discussions with members, usually every year. A staff team visits the country, collects economic and financial information, and discusses with officials the country’s economic developments and policies. On return to headquarters, the staff prepares a report, which forms the basis for discussion by the Executive Board.

    [1] The Financial Sector Assessment Program (FSAP), established in 1999, is a comprehensive and in-depth assessment of a country’s financial sector. FSAPs provide input for Article IV consultations and thus enhance Fund surveillance. FSAPs are mandatory for the 47 jurisdictions with systemically important financial sectors and otherwise conducted upon request from member countries. The key findings of an FSAP are summarized in a Financial System Stability Assessment (FSSA).

    [2] At the conclusion of the discussion, the Managing Director, as Chairman of the Board, summarizes the views of Executive Directors, and this summary is transmitted to the country’s authorities. An explanation of any qualifiers used in summings up can be found here: http://www.IMF.org/external/np/sec/misc/qualifiers.htm.


    IMF Communications Department
    MEDIA RELATIONS

    PRESS OFFICER: Rosa Hernandez

    Phone: +1 202 623-7100Email: MEDIA@IMF.org

    https://www.imf.org/en/News/Articles/2025/01/28/PR25018-Bolivia-IMF-Executive-Board-Concludes-2024-Article-IV-Consultation-with-Bolivia

    MIL OSI

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Moscow enterprises will take part in 30 foreign exhibitions with the support of the Mosprom Centre

    Source: Moscow Metro

    This year, Moscow’s export-focused companies will have enhanced opportunities to connect with international partners, with the MosProm center organizing 25 international business missions and facilitating participation in 5 major international trade shows. These initiatives, which include both in-person and virtual engagements, will provide Moscow producers with vital platforms for discussions with overseas collaborators. This was announced by Maksim Liksutov, Deputy Mayor of Moscow for Transport and Industry.

    Tastes of Moscow.

    As directed by Sergey Sobyanin, the city is prioritizing support for export-oriented enterprises in expanding their presence in global markets. Our main objective is to increase the volume of exports of Moscow-produced industrial goods and agricultural products to friendly nations. Moscow manufacturers will showcase their products at international exhibitions in China, Saudi Arabia, Uzbekistan, and Azerbaijan. They will also engage in direct negotiations with potential buyers and distributors from Mexico, the UAE, Iran, Kuwait, Jordan, Turkey, Thailand, Vietnam, India, Mongolia, and countries across Africa and the CIS, – stated Maksim Liksutov.

    MosProm was established in 2019 to increase the recognition and presence of Moscow-made products in overseas markets. One of the most effective programs offered by MosProm is its buyer program. This initiative allows companies to participate in specialized international trade shows and business missions, where they can conduct business-to-business (B2B) and business-to-government (B2G) negotiations with prospective clients for Moscow-produced goods. This offers local industrial companies the opportunity to expand their export reach and product offerings, establish new partnerships and client relationships, and attract valuable investment.

    Tastes of Moscow.

    MosProm specialists provide comprehensive support to Moscow-based manufacturers at every stage of their foreign trade activities. Thanks to MosProm’s assistance, Moscow’s non-resource, non-energy producers have successfully reoriented their export flows and found new partners in markets across Latin America, Africa, the Middle East, Southeast Asia, and the CIS, – emphasized Anatoly Garbuzov, Minister of the Moscow Government and Head of the city’s Department of Investment and Industrial Policy.

    Furthermore, Moscow exporters benefit greatly from national support programs. The International Cooperation and Export national project is a comprehensive suite of informational, financial, insurance, and logistical support measures. The project includes the My Export digital platform, which offers a range of support services for businesses. These services include free expert consultations, market analytics, assistance in marketing goods on international marketplaces, online training programs, and more.

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI Economics: IMF Executive Board Concludes 2024 Article IV Consultation with Bolivia

    Source: International Monetary Fund

    January 28, 2025

    Washington, DC: On March 22nd, the Executive Board of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) concluded the Article IV consultation1 for Bolivia. This also included a discussion of the findings of the Financial Sector Assessment Program (FSAP) exercise for Bolivia.[1]

    Bolivia’s growth momentum moderated in 2023, to 2.5 percent, from declining natural gas production, less public investment, and financial market turmoil. Price controls, food and fuel subsidies, export restrictions, and strong agricultural production held inflation below 2 percent at year-end. However, the combination of lower natural gas exports, high fuel imports, a large fiscal deficit―increasingly financed by the central bank―and an overvalued exchange rate contributed to a wider current account deficit (estimated at 5 percent of GDP for 2023) and near-depletion of international reserves. Public debt increased to nearly 84 percent of GDP by end-2023. Sovereign spreads rose sharply in early 2023 as the foreign exchange (FX) shortage became apparent and a mid-sized bank (Banco Fassil) failed. Consequently, banks were forced to restrict the withdrawal of FX deposits, heightening financial sector stability risks.

    Growth is anticipated to decelerate to 1.6 percent in 2024, holding at around 2.2-2.3 percent in the medium term under the continuation of the current policies. Inflation is forecast to reach 4.5 percent in 2024, stabilizing around 4 percent thereafter. The outlook is however predicated on significantly improved access to external financing, without which the risk of disorderly fiscal and/or exchange rate adjustment is elevated. External factors such as reduced demand, intensified global conflicts disrupting trade routes, commodity price volatility, or a renewed tightening of financial conditions could worsen fiscal and external imbalances, impede growth, and destabilize the domestic financial sector.

    Additionally, extreme weather events, like the 2023 droughts and recent floods, pose a risk to Bolivia’s agricultural sector and critical infrastructure. Domestically, a faster decline in hydrocarbon production, higher inflation due to FX scarcity, or confidence shocks could further impact growth, hurt real incomes and exacerbate financial stability risks. Social unrest stemming from inequality and security concerns remains a concern, as evidenced by the prolonged road blockages of early 2024. On the upside, Bolivia could potentially benefit from the global shift towards green energy due to its vast lithium resources, although developing the lithium sector and scaling up domestic production capacity will likely take time.

    Executive Board Assessment[2]

    Executive Directors agreed with the thrust of the staff appraisal. They welcomed Bolivia’s socioeconomic progress over the past several years but expressed concerns about the difficult financial situation Bolivia currently finds itself in, with low reserves, uncertain fiscal financing, and pressures in parallel exchange markets. Directors stressed the urgency of a shift from current unsustainable policies to avoid a disorderly adjustment that would exert significant social and economic hardship.

    Directors called for continued constructive engagement on a sustainable policy mix that is likely to require both fiscal adjustment phased in over the next few years and an up front step devaluation to more quickly address the external imbalance and allow for a build up of reserves. They emphasized the importance of improving the social safety net to shield poorer households from inflation pressures following a realignment of the exchange rate. Directors also emphasized the importance of strengthening fiscal institutions to underpin the credibility of the planned adjustment and to improve central bank governance in support of a shift to a crawling peg and, eventually, to inflation targeting.

    Directors recommended a strengthening of the central banks’ capacity to conduct sterilization operations and to lift lending rate caps to improve the allocation of capital and enhance monetary policy transmission. They also underscored the need to improve crisis preparedness and contingency planning in line with FSAP recommendations to safeguard financial stability.

    Directors recommended a range of supply side reforms to unlock private investment, boost productivity and enhance competitiveness. These should include phasing out export ceilings and price controls and better prioritizing public investment projects. A stronger regulatory framework for hydrocarbon and lithium exploration could be instrumental in increasing investment in those sectors. Directors also called for enhancing AML/CFT framework and ensuring the timely publication of key macroeconomic data.

     

    Table 1. Bolivia: Selected Economic and Social Indicators, 2022–2026

    Population (millions, 2021)

    11.8

    Poverty rate (percent, 2021)

    36.3

    Population growth rate (percent, 2021)

    1.4

    Adult literacy rate (percent, 2021)

    94.8

    Life expectancy at birth (years, 2021)

    72

    GDP per capita (US$, 2021)

    3,437

    Total unemployment rate (2021)

    7.0

    IMF Quota (SDR, millions)

    240.1

    Est.

    2022

    2023

    2024

    2025

    2026

    Income and prices

    Real GDP

    3.6

    2.5

    1.6

    2.2

    2.2

    Nominal GDP

    8.9

    4.9

    6.2

    6.5

    6.2

    CPI inflation (period average)

    1.7

    2.6

    4.5

    4.2

    3.9

    CPI inflation (end of period)

    3.1

    2.1

    4.8

    4.0

    3.9

    Investment and savings 1/

    Total investment

    15.1

    15.9

    16.6

    16.3

    16.0

    Of which: Public sector

    5.7

    5.0

    6.0

    6.0

    6.0

    Gross national savings

    12.5

    8.6

    10.5

    10.3

    10.5

    Of which: Public sector

    -1.4

    -2.0

    -1.9

    -1.5

    -1.2

    Combined public sector

    Revenues and grants

    28.9

    28.3

    27.6

    27.4

    27.1

    Of which: Hydrocarbon related revenue

    6.0

    5.4

    4.3

    3.9

    3.5

    Expenditure

    36.0

    35.3

    35.5

    34.8

    34.3

    Current

    30.3

    30.3

    29.5

    28.8

    28.3

    Capital 2/

    5.7

    5.0

    6.0

    6.0

    6.0

    Net lending/borrowing (overall balance)

    -7.1

    -7.0

    -7.9

    -7.5

    -7.2

    Of which: Non-hydrocarbon balance

    -12.8

    -12.2

    -12.0

    -11.2

    -10.5

    Total gross NFPS debt 3/

    80.4

    83.6

    86.7

    88.9

    90.9

    External sector

    Current account 1/

    -0.4

    -5.0

    -5.7

    -5.8

    -5.6

    Exports of goods and services

    32.6

    28.5

    27.0

    26.9

    26.5

    Of which: Natural gas

    6.7

    3.8

    3.4

    3.0

    2.7

    Imports of goods and services

    32.9

    34.4

    33.6

    33.6

    32.7

    Capital account

    0.0

    0.0

    0.0

    0.0

    0.0

    Financial account (-= net inflow)

    -1.5

    -0.5

    -5.3

    -5.8

    -5.6

    Of which: Direct investment net

    -0.8

    -0.6

    -0.6

    -0.9

    -0.9

    Of which: Other investment, net

    -0.3

    -0.3

    -4.6

    -4.7

    -5.1

    Net errors and omissions

    -3.0

    0.0

    0.0

    0.0

    0.0

    Terms of trade index (percent change)

    -1.6

    1.2

    -0.6

    0.0

    0.2

    Central Bank gross foreign reserves 4/ 5/ 6/

    In millions of U.S. dollars

    3,796

    1,808

    1,653

    1,555

    1,556

    In months of imports of goods and services

    2.8

    1.3

    1.1

    1.0

    1.0

    In percent of GDP

    8.6

    3.9

    3.4

    3.0

    2.8

    In percent of ARA

    44.5

    20.8

    18.2

    16.2

    15.5

    Money and credit

    Credit to the private sector (percent change)

    6.3

    -0.4

    3.0

    4.3

    5.1

    Credit to the private sector (percent of GDP)

    74.2

    70.5

    68.4

    67.0

    66.3

    Broad money (percent of GDP)

    85.2

    82.8

    81.2

    80.0

    78.9

    Memorandum items:

    Nominal GDP (in billions of U.S. dollars)

    44.3

    46.5

    49.3

    52.5

    55.8

    Bolivianos/U.S. dollar (end-of-period) 7/

    6.9

    6.9

    REER, period average (percent change) 8/

    -0.9

    -1.9

    Oil prices (in U.S. dollars per barrel)

    96.4

    80.6

    77.7

    73.8

    70.9

    Energy-related subsidies to SOEs (percent of GDP) 9/

    4.4

    4.0

    3.5

    2.7

    2.4

    Sources: Bolivian authorities (MEFP, Ministry of Planning, BCB, INE, UDAPE); IMF; Fund staff calculations.
    1/ The discrepancy between the current account and the savings-investment balance reflects methodological differences. For the projection years, the discrepancy is assumed to remain constant in dollar value.
    2/ Includes nationalization costs and net lending.
    3/ Public debt includes SOE’s borrowing from the BCB (but not from other domestic institutions) and BCB loans to FINPRO and FNDR.
    4/ Excludes reserves from the Latin American Reserve Fund (FLAR) and Offshore Liquidity Requirements (RAL).
    5/ All foreign assets valued at market prices.
    6/ Includes a repurchase line of US$99.2 million maturing in 2025.
    7/ Official (buy) exchange rate.
    8/ The REER based on authorities’ methodology is different from that of the IMF (see 2018 and 2017 Staff Reports).
    9/ Includes the cost of subsidy borne by public enterprises and incentives for hydrocarbon exploration investments in the projection period.

    1 Under Article IV of the IMF’s Articles of Agreement, the IMF holds bilateral discussions with members, usually every year. A staff team visits the country, collects economic and financial information, and discusses with officials the country’s economic developments and policies. On return to headquarters, the staff prepares a report, which forms the basis for discussion by the Executive Board.

    [1] The Financial Sector Assessment Program (FSAP), established in 1999, is a comprehensive and in-depth assessment of a country’s financial sector. FSAPs provide input for Article IV consultations and thus enhance Fund surveillance. FSAPs are mandatory for the 47 jurisdictions with systemically important financial sectors and otherwise conducted upon request from member countries. The key findings of an FSAP are summarized in a Financial System Stability Assessment (FSSA).

    [2] At the conclusion of the discussion, the Managing Director, as Chairman of the Board, summarizes the views of Executive Directors, and this summary is transmitted to the country’s authorities. An explanation of any qualifiers used in summings up can be found here: http://www.IMF.org/external/np/sec/misc/qualifiers.htm.


    IMF Communications Department
    MEDIA RELATIONS

    PRESS OFFICER: Rosa Hernandez

    Phone: +1 202 623-7100Email: MEDIA@IMF.org

    MIL OSI Economics

  • MIL-OSI USA: 01.28.2025 Sens. Cruz, Durbin, Colleagues Introduce Bill to Rename Cuban Embassy Street After Murdered Dissident Oswaldo Payá

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Texas Ted Cruz

    WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Sens. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), and colleagues introduced bipartisan legislation to rename the street outside of the Cuban embassy in Washington, D.C. as “Oswaldo Payá Way” after the Cuban dissident leader who was assassinated by Cuba’s communist regime. Yesterday, Sen. Cruz met with Rosa María Payá, Oswaldo Payá’s daughter, to discuss the reintroduction of this bill.

    Upon introduction, Sen. Cruz said, “I am honored to be leading legislation to pay tribute to the heroism of Oswaldo Payá, who was a fearless defender of freedom and democracy for the Cuban people. His unwavering courage in standing against Castro’s oppressive communist regime cost him his life but not his legacy. Renaming the street in front of the Cuban embassy in his honor will serve as a reminder of the regime’s brutality and the ongoing struggle for freedom in Cuba. This legislation is bipartisan and should be uncontroversial, and I urge my colleagues to expeditiously advance and pass it.”
    Sen. Durbin said, “The legacy of Cuban dissident Oswaldo Payá and the fight for justice and democracy in Cuba will live on. With this bill, we would designate the street outside the Cuban Embassy in Washington D.C., ‘Oswaldo Payá Way’—a symbolic effort to recognize internationally respected Oswaldo Payá, who was the embodiment of Cuban hope to a peaceful path to freedom. We stand with the Payá family and the people of Cuba in urging peaceful democratic reform and the release of all political prisoners.”
    The legislation is also co-sponsored by Sens. John Curtis (R-Utah), and Rick Scott (R-Fla.).
    Read the bill text here.
    BACKGROUND
    Oswaldo Paya was a Cuban dissident who was murdered by the Cuban regime on July 22, 2012. The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights formally determined and confirmed that the regime was directly responsible for the murder.
    Sen. Cruz has long fought to honor the legacy of Oswaldo Payá and hold the Cuban regime accountable for his murder. Sen. Cruz has led this bipartisan effort to rename the street in front of the Cuban Embassy since 2015. Sen. Cruz has also previously introduced this legislation in 2017, 2020, 2021, and 2023.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Wyden Joins 46 Lawmakers in Urging Supreme Court to Stop Flow of American Firearms to Mexican Drug Cartels

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Ron Wyden (D-Ore)
    January 28, 2025
    Smith & Wesson will be a critical case for victims and survivors of gun violence hoping to hold the gun industry accountable for its actions
    Washington, D.C. — U.S. Senator Ron Wyden, D-Ore., said today he has joined 46 lawmakers in an amicus brief to the U.S. Supreme Court concerning a legal case that would hold gun manufacturers accountable for their role in the illegal trafficking of firearms to Mexico.
    “As the American firearm industry continues to rake in more profit from selling firearms to Mexican drug cartels, people continue to suffer at the hands of gun violence every day in Oregon and in our country,” Wyden said. “Gun manufacturers must be held accountable for their reckless business practices that have torn apart our families, neighborhoods, and schools. I thank my colleagues for their effort to ensure that the American firearm industry stops putting a weapon of mass destruction in dangerous hands again, and supporting the voices of gun violence survivors.”
    In the ongoing Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. et al., v. Estados Unidos Mexicanos, Mexico is suing U.S. gun manufacturers and a distributor for allegedly aiding and abetting illegal arms trafficking. The lawmakers argue that the gun industry should not be insulated from liability for its own unlawful conduct, as their constituents have been harmed by gun violence or the threat of it.
    In addition to Wyden, the amicus brief was led by U.S. Senator Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., and U.S. Representatives Madeleine Dean, D-Pa., and Jamie Raskin, D-Md., and was joined by U.S. Senators Chris Murphy, D-Conn., Cory Booker, D-N.J., Mazie K. Hirono, D-Hawai’i., Tim Kaine, D-Va., Jack Reed, D-R.I., Adam B. Schiff, D-Calif., Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., and Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., and U.S. Representatives Rosa L. DeLauro, D-Conn., Gabe Amo, D-R.I., Becca Balint, D-Vt., Julia Brownley, D-Calif., André Carson, D-Ind., Sean Casten D-Ill., Jasmine Crockett, D-Texas., Danny K. Davis, D-Ill., Bill Foster, D-Ill., Valerie P. Foushee, D-N.C., Dan Goldman, D-N.Y., Glenn Ivey, D-Md., Henry C. “Hank” Johnson, Jr., D-Ga., Ted Lieu, D-Calif., Seth Magaziner, D-R.I., Betty McCollum, D-Minn., James P. McGovern, D-Md., Seth Moulton, D-Mass., Eleanor Holmes Norton, D-D.C., Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., Mark Pocan, D-Wis., Mike Quigly, D-Ill., Delia C. Ramirez, D-Ill., Mary Gay Scanlon, D-Pa., Jan Schakowsky, D-Ill., Mike Thompson, D-Calif., Rashida Tlaib, D-Mich., Jill Tokuda, D-Hawai’i, Paul D. Tonko, D-N.Y., and Maxine Waters, D-Calif.
    The U.S. Supreme Court is expected to hear oral arguments in this case on March 4, 2025.
    The text of the bill is here.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI United Nations: Endorsing Resolution, General Assembly Calls Upon All Stakeholders to Implement 2024–2034 Programme of Action for Landlocked Developing Countries

    Source: United Nations General Assembly and Security Council

    Text on UN Cooperation with Community-Portuguese-Speaking Countries Also Adopted

    The General Assembly today adopted a resolution containing the “Programme of Action for Landlocked Developing Countries for the Decade 2024–2034” — which focuses on diversifying economies, promoting trade, supporting jobs and enhancing climate resilience over the next 10 years in that group of nations — calling upon all stakeholders to commit to implementing it.

    In that action programme — listed in the annex of document A/79/L.21 — the Assembly recommitted to expediting action on the Sustainable Development Goals, calling for increased investment, including through international cooperation, and taking necessary measures to harmonize skills development and training programmes at the national and regional levels.

    The Programme of Action, which was originally adopted 24 December 2024 (see Press Release GA/12671), also lays out Member States’ commitments to substantially increasing investment from all sources in research and development, and in building accessible, reliable and affordable digital infrastructure.  The Assembly committed to doubling the contribution of manufacturing value added to the gross domestic product (GDP) of the landlocked developing countries by 2034.  Further, 193-member body urged development partners to support landlocked developing countries in strengthening strategic coherence between trade and investment policies, and industrial policy objectives.

    “The 570 million people living in the landlocked developing countries deserve nothing less,” said Assembly President Philémon Yang (Cameroon).  “For too long, they have faced unique challenges to trade, connectivity and development,” he added.  Recent shocks, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, rising prices worldwide, geopolitical tensions and the deepening impact of climate change, have only intensified their vulnerabilities.

    “The combined gross domestic product of landlocked developing countries in 2023 came in at 8 per cent below pre-pandemic projections,” he went on to say, commending these countries for their “resilience and ability to quickly reverse negative trends”.  The Assembly, “the great drum that gives voice to all peoples and nation”, will monitor implementation of the programme of action, he pledged.

    Rabab Fatima, Secretary-General of the third United Nations Conference on Landlocked Developing Countries, said the group of countries face profound challenges.  To address their issues, the new Programme of Action proposes regional agricultural hubs, which can help transform the sector and spearhead efforts toward sustainable development.

    “Internet usage is far below the global average,” she added, emphasizing the need to bridge the gender gap in the area.  On trade, she said that landlocked developing countries face 40 per cent higher trade costs than coastal States.  Climate finance remains grossly insufficient for landlocked developing countries, she added, noting that the Programme of Action underscores the need to urge development partners to honour their official development assistance (ODA) commitments.

    “This instrument must be a catalyst to eliminate structural barriers,” said Diego Pary Rodríguez (Bolivia), Chair of the Group of Landlocked Developing Countries.  Many of these countries have taken many measures to diversify their economies, but the Programme of Action has the potential to build new alliances that can provide them with the economic, political and technological tools to overcome barriers.

    He pointed out that the lack of development of regional transport corridors continues to undermine their participation in global trade. “Trade remains a critical means for the landlocked developing countries to achieve economic growth,” he said.  “We also ask for your support in capacity-building initiatives that will allow landlocked developing countries to comply with global trade standards,” he added, stressing the importance of fostering international cooperation in the transfer of clean technology to strengthen responses to climate change. 

    Cooperation between United Nations and Community of Portuguese-Speaking Countries

    By adopting a text titled “Cooperation between the United Nations and the Community of Portuguese-speaking Countries” (document A/79/L.43), the Assembly also stressed the importance of strengthening the cooperation between the Community and United Nations specialized agencies and other entities and programmes.

    By other terms of that resolution, the Assembly stressed the importance of partnership and cooperation between the UN and other relevant organizations, including the Community, to improve coordination and cooperation in peacebuilding and sustaining peace.

    Appointment of Member of Advisory Committee on Administrative and Budgetary Questions 

    On other matters, the Assembly appointed Alexandra Arias (Dominican Republic) as a member of the Advisory Committee on Administrative and Budgetary Questions (ACABQ) for a term of office beginning on 31 January and expiring on 31 December.  She replaces Olivio Fermín, also of the Dominican Republic, who resigned effective 31 January.

    Application of Article 19 of UN Charter 

    The Assembly also noted that Antigua and Barbuda has made the payments necessary to reduce its arrears in assessed contributions to the United Nations below the amount specified in Article 19 of the Charter.

    MIL OSI United Nations News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Washington joins multistate suit over federal financial assistance freeze

    Source: Washington State News

    OLYMPIA — Washington state today joined 21 other states suing the Trump administration over its illegal freeze of all federal financial assistance, which directly threatens the health and safety of Washingtonians reliant on a variety of federally funded programs by potentially withholding billions in funds from the state.

    The direction issued Monday by the federal Office of Management and Budget to pause financial assistance programs could impact childcare and special education grants, highway planning and construction dollars, energy cost assistance rebates, substance abuse treatment, and nursing care for veterans, among other programs.

    The White House says the pause is to ensure the funds are “advancing Administration priorities.”

    “The White House justifies this damaging move with culture war alarmism, but in reality they’re robbing governments and service providers of funds that keep people safe and serve urgent needs in all of our communities,” Attorney General Nick Brown said. “People’s jobs are at stake. Services for veterans are at risk. Health care and education would be taken from children. Programs that support crime victims could vanish. These examples are the tip of the iceberg.”

    If funding is cut off for these programs, even temporarily, it would interfere with critical state programs, drastically worsen Washington’s budget shortfall, and make it nearly impossible for state agencies and the Legislature to intelligently prioritize budgeting needs.

    “Presidents have significant powers and elections have consequences,” Gov. Bob Ferguson said. “However, President Trump’s refusal or inability to advance his priorities in a lawful and constitutional manner is creating needless and cruel chaos. We’re confident that the courts will, once again, determine that he is exceeding his authority.”

    The administration’s memo does not explain any legal authority for this action, because they have none. The lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court for Rhode Island, lays out the various ways the Trump administration is breaking federal law by freezing a broad swath of financial assistance programs beyond the scope of its authority while also usurping the role of Congress.

    The complaint seeks to enjoin the Trump administration from enforcing or implementing the memo and requests a judicial declaration that the memo is unlawful.

    Read the filing here.

    This lawsuit is led by the attorneys general of New York, California, Illinois, Massachusetts, New Jersey and Rhode Island. Joining the lawsuit are the attorneys general of Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oregon, Vermont, Wisconsin, and the District of Columbia. 

    -30-

    Washington’s Attorney General serves the people and the state of Washington. As the state’s largest law firm, the Attorney General’s Office provides legal representation to every state agency, board, and commission in Washington. Additionally, the Office serves the people directly by enforcing consumer protection, civil rights, and environmental protection laws. The Office also prosecutes elder abuse, Medicaid fraud, and handles sexually violent predator cases in 38 of Washington’s 39 counties. Visit www.atg.wa.gov to learn more.

    Media Contact:

    Email: press@atg.wa.gov

    Phone: (360) 753-2727

    General contacts: Click here

    Media Resource Guide & Attorney General’s Office FAQ

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Tuberville, Cruz Introduce Legislation to Protect American Fishermen from Cartels

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Tommy Tuberville (Alabama)
    WASHINGTON – Today, U.S. Senator Tommy Tuberville (R-AL) joined Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) in reintroducing legislation to target illegally caught red snapper and tuna imports. The senators introduced similar legislation last Congress.
    The Illegal Red Snapper and Tuna Enforcement Act would require the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) to develop a standard methodology for identifying the country of origin of red snapper or tuna imported into the United States. Snapper poaching continues to be an issue across the Gulf of America, as Mexican fishermen illegally catch red snapper, smuggle it into their country, and then confuse American consumers by selling our fish back to us. 
    “Alabama lands 34 percent of all recreationally caught Red Snapper in the Gulf,” said Senator Tuberville. “Unfortunately, our domestic Red Snapper industry is being undermined by Mexican fishermen who are illegally catching American snapper in the Gulf, smuggling them into Mexico, and then reselling the same fish back to American consumers. In addition to taking business away from Alabama’s fishermen, many of the profits from these illegal fishing operations are funding the cartels. I’m proud to join Senator Cruz in introducing the Illegal Red Snapper and Tuna Enforcement Act to stop illegal Red Snapper from flooding our markets and bankrupting our great fishermen.”
    U.S. Senators Tuberville and Cruz were joined by U.S. Senators Katie Britt (R-AL) and Brian Schatz (D-HI).
    Full text of the legislation can be found here.
    BACKGROUND:
    Mexican fishermen cross the maritime border between Texas and Mexico on small boats called “lanchas” to illegally catch red snapper in U.S. waters and return to Mexico. The fish are sold in Mexico or mixed in with legally-caught red snapper then exported back into the United States across land borders. Red snapper is one of the most well-managed and profitable fish in the Gulf of Mexico, but illegal fishing by Mexican lanchas puts law-abiding U.S. fishermen and seafood producers at a competitive disadvantage. Illegal, Unreported, and Unregulated (IUU) fishing activities violate both national and international fishing regulations.
    Cartels engaged in drug smuggling and human trafficking also engage in the profitable illegal fishing of red snapper. The same fishing boats and fishermen who catch red snapper also smuggle drugs and humans for the cartels, and these profits support the organization.
    Technology exists to chemically test and find the geographic origin of many foods, but not for red snapper or tuna. The Illegal Red Snapper and Tuna Enforcement Act would develop a field test kit the Coast Guard could use to accurately ascertain whether fish were caught in Mexico or U.S. waters, thus allowing federal and state law enforcement officers to identify the origin of the fish and confiscate illegally caught red snapper or tuna before it is imported back into the U.S.
    With the help of machine learning, NIST scientists are currently able to chemically determine the geographic origin of foods, including strawberries, apples, cherries, ginseng, ginkgo, beef, honey, and rice. Using those same methodologies, these scientists believe it would be possible to determine the geographic origin of red snapper. This would allow law enforcement to have a better understanding of the networks that support illegal fishing. It would also reduce the financial incentives for the crime, since the fish could no longer be sold back into the United States. If successful, this method could be expanded to identify other IUU fish.
    MORE:
    Tuberville Takes Aim At Cartels Engaged in Illegal Red Snapper Fishing
    Tuberville Voices Concerns About New Federal Red Snapper Limits
    Tuberville, Colleagues Advocate for Management Flexibility to Preserve Red Snapper Season
    Senator Tommy Tuberville represents Alabama in the United States Senate and is a member of the Senate Armed Services, Agriculture, Veterans’ Affairs, HELP, and Aging Committees.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI: Mountain America Credit Union Sponsors Artists in Residence Program Through the Leonardo

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    SANDY, Utah, Jan. 28, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Mountain America Credit Union announced its sponsorship of the Leonardo’s Artists in Residence program, running through October 2025. This partnership underscores Mountain America’s commitment to supporting local and multicultural initiatives that enrich the community.

    A Media Snippet accompanying this announcement is available by clicking on this link.

    The Artists in Residence program, in collaboration with Artes de Mexico en Utah, features a new Latino artist each month and includes a fixed exhibit on the second floor of the Leonardo. These Utah-based Latino artists will be present throughout the week, allowing attendees to interact with them.

    “Sponsoring the Artists in Residence program with the Leonardo aligns with our commitment to advocate for underserved communities,” said Sharlene Wells, senior vice president of public relations and organizational communications at Mountain America. “We value the work the Leonardo is doing and see this as the beginning of a partnership that will help us build more relationships within the community and open new doors for collaboration.”

    The Leonardo, a nonprofit community-powered museum established in 2011, is dedicated to breaking down barriers and creating a better future through self-discovery, collaboration and connection. The museum’s mission is to blend science, technology, and art in ways that inspire creativity and innovation among people of all ages and backgrounds.

    “Our partnership with Mountain America exemplifies the power of collaboration in fostering creativity and community engagement,” stated Alexandra Hesse, executive director of the Leonardo. “Together, we are proud to support our Artists in Residence program throughout 2025, creating opportunities for innovation, inspiration, and cultural enrichment that resonate deeply with our shared commitment to making a difference.”

    This initiative brings art back to the community, encouraging visitors to engage with local artists, ask questions and view several finished pieces on display. The program aims to promote diverse artistic expression and facilitate cross-cultural community revitalization, with a special focus on sharing the history, ideas and lived experiences of the Latino population with a broader audience.

    To learn more about Mountain America, visit macu.com.

    About Mountain America Credit Union
    With more than 1 million members and $20 billion in assets, Mountain America Credit Union helps its members define and achieve their financial dreams. Mountain America provides consumers and businesses with a variety of convenient, flexible products and services, as well as sound, timely advice. Members enjoy access to secure, cutting-edge mobile banking technology, over 100 branches across multiple states, and more than 50,000 surcharge-free ATMs. Mountain America—guiding you forward. Learn more at macu.com.

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI USA: Federal Disaster Assistance Tops $24.6 Million for Chaves Residents

    Source: US Federal Emergency Management Agency

    Headline: Federal Disaster Assistance Tops $24.6 Million for Chaves Residents

    Federal Disaster Assistance Tops $24.6 Million for Chaves Residents

    ROSWELL, New Mexico — It has been just over three months since former President Joe Biden declared a major disaster for the state of New Mexico following the Oct. 19-20 Severe Storm and Flooding in Chaves County. To date, more than $24.6 million in federal assistance has been approved for New Mexican families affected by the disaster.FEMA and the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) have approved grants and loans for more than 3,000 recovering homeowners, renters and businesses in Chaves County. This assistance helps pay for eligible losses and disaster-related damage repair and replacement of homes and personal property, temporary housing, cleaning and sanitizing, moving and storage, childcare, medical and dental expenses and other needs of New Mexicans affected by the storm and flooding.“FEMA collaborates closely with all our federal, state and local stakeholders to help New Mexicans affected by the disaster as they recover. We must remember that this is a long-term effort, but one that will be critical in building a more resilient and stronger Roswell,” said José Gil Montañez, Federal Coordinating Officer for New Mexico.As of Jan. 27, FEMA Individual Assistance totaled more than $17.8 million in grants to eligible homeowners and renters, including:More than $8.88 million in housing grants to help pay for home repair, home replacement and rental assistance for temporary housing.  More than $8.94 million in grants to help pay for personal property replacement and other serious disaster-related needs, such as moving and storage fees, transportation, childcare, and medical and dental expenses. FEMA Voluntary Agency Liaisons (VALs)The VALs mission is to establish, foster and maintain relationships among government, voluntary, faith-based and community partners. Through these relationships, the VALs support the delivery of inclusive and equitable services and empower and strengthen capabilities of communities to address disaster caused unmet needs. In addition, VALs coordinate with local partners to assist with the collection and distribution of in-kind and monetary donations to aid in the Chaves County recovery process. By coordinating appeals through local Voluntary Organizations Active in Disasters (VOADs), the VALs have identified nearly $146,000 in additional FEMA Individual Assistance for Chaves County recovery. State and local VOADs have also distributed more than $461,000 in financial assistance to Chaves County survivors to support immediate needs and recovery efforts.Public Assistance  FEMA’s Public Assistance (PA) program for the October flooding reimburses the state, counties, local governments, tribes, and certain private nonprofits (including houses of worship) for eligible costs of disaster-related debris removal and emergency protective measures. PA in Chaves County is available, on a cost -sharing basis: FEMA pays 75%, the state 25%. FEMA has received eight applications for project funding under the PA program. Of those, seven projects are now under review. Small Business AdministrationThe U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) has approved more than $6.8 million in long-term, low-interest disaster loans to homeowners, renters, businesses and non-profit organizations. Of that amount, more than $6 million was approved for homeowners and renters with over $2.9 million distributed. Approving more than $476,000 to Chaves – County business, SBA has distributed over $300,000 to assist in their recovery.Applicants may apply at https://lending.sba.gov. Business owners also may apply in-person by visiting SBA Business Recovery Center at the Eastern New Mexico University Roswell Arts and Sciences Center. The deadline to apply to SBA for property damage was Jan, 2, 2025. The deadline to apply for economic injury is Aug. 1, 2025.For the latest information on the Chaves County recovery, visit fema.gov/disaster/4843. Follow FEMA Region 6 on social media at x.com/FEMARegion6 and facebook.com/femaregion6  
    alexa.brown
    Tue, 01/28/2025 – 20:43

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-Evening Report: Trump 2.0 chaos and destruction — what it means Down Under

    What will happen to Australia — and New Zealand — once the superpower that has been followed into endless battles, the United States, finally unravels?

    COMMENTARY: By Michelle Pini, managing editor of Independent Australia

    With President Donald Trump now into his second week in the White House, horrific fires have continued to rage across Los Angeles and the details of Elon Musk’s allegedly dodgy Twitter takeover began to emerge, the world sits anxiously by.

    The consequences of a second Trump term will reverberate globally, not only among Western nations. But given the deeply entrenched Americanisation of much of the Western world, this is about how it will navigate the after-shocks once the United States finally unravels — for unravel it surely will.

    Leading with chaos
    Now that the world’s biggest superpower and war machine has a deranged criminal at the helm — for a second time — none of us know the lengths to which Trump (and his puppet masters) will go as his fingers brush dangerously close to the nuclear codes. Will he be more emboldened?

    The signs are certainly there.

    President Donald Trump 2.0 . . . will his cruelty towards migrants and refugees escalate, matched only by his fuelling of racial division? Image: ABC News screenshot IA

    So far, Trump — who had already led the insurrection of a democratically elected government — has threatened to exit the nuclear arms pact with Russia, talked up a trade war with China and declared “all hell will break out” in the Middle East if Hamas hadn’t returned the Israeli hostages.

    Will his cruelty towards migrants and refugees escalate, matched only by his fuelling of racial division?

    This, too, appears to be already happening.

    Trump’s rants leading up to his inauguration last week had been a steady stream of crazed declarations, each one more unhinged than the last.

    He wants to buy Greenland. He wishes to overturn birthright citizenship in order to deport even more migrant children, such as  “pet-eating Haitians and “insane Hannibal Lecters” because America has been “invaded”.

    It will be interesting to see whether his planned evictions of Mexicans will include the firefighters Mexico sent to Los Angeles’ aid.

    At the same time, Trump wants to turn Canada into the 51st state, because, he said,

    “It would make a great state. And the people of Canada like it.”

    Will sexual predator Trump’s level of misogyny sink to even lower depths post Roe v Wade?

    Probably.

    Denial of catastrophic climate consequences
    And will Trump be in even further denial over the catastrophic consequences of climate change than during his last term? Even as Los Angeles grapples with a still climbing death toll of 25 lives lost, 12,000 homes, businesses and other structures destroyed and 16,425 hectares (about the size of Washington DC) wiped out so far in the latest climactic disaster?

    The fires are, of course, symptomatic of the many years of criminal negligence on global warming. But since Trump instead accused California officials of “prioritising environmental policies over public safety” while his buddy and head of government “efficiency”, Musk blamed black firefighters for the fires, it would appear so.

    Will the madman, for surely he is one, also gift even greater protections to oligarchs like Musk?

    Trump has already appointed billionaire buddies Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy to:

     “…pave the way for my Administration to dismantle government bureaucracy, slash excess regulations, cut wasteful expenditures and restructure Federal agencies”.

    So, this too is already happening.

    All of these actions will combine to create a scenario of destruction that will see the implosion of the US as we know it, though the details are yet to emerge.

    The flawed AUKUS pact sinking quickly . . . Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese with outgoing President Joe Biden, will Australia have the mettle to be bigger than Trump. Image: Independent Australia

    What happens Down Under?
    US allies — like Australia — have already been thoroughly indoctrinated by American pop culture in order to complement the many army bases they house and the defence agreements they have signed.

    Though Trump hasn’t shown any interest in making it a 52nd state, Australia has been tucked up in bed with the United States since the Cold War. Our foreign policy has hinged on this alliance, which also significantly affects Australia’s trade and economy, not to mention our entire cultural identity, mired as it is in US-style fast food dependence and reality TV. Would you like Vegemite McShaker Fries with that?

    So what will happen to Australia once the superpower we have followed into endless battles finally breaks down?

    As Dr Martin Hirst wrote in November:

    ‘Trump has promised chaos and chaos is what he’ll deliver.’

    His rise to power will embolden the rabid Far-Right in the US but will this be mirrored here? And will Australia follow the US example and this year elect our very own (admittedly scaled down) version of Trump, personified by none other than the Trump-loving Peter Dutton?

    If any of his wild announcements are to be believed, between building walls and evicting even US nationals he doesn’t like, while simultaneously making Canadians US citizens, Trump will be extremely busy.

    There will be little time even to consider Australia, let alone come to our rescue should we ever need the might of the US war machine — no matter whether it is an Albanese or sycophantic Dutton leadership.

    It is a given, however, that we would be required to honour all defence agreements should our ally demand it.

    It would be great if, as psychologists urge us to do when children act up, our leaders could simply ignore and refuse to engage with him, but it remains to be seen whether Australia will have the mettle to be bigger than Trump.

    Republished from the Independent Australia with permission.

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI: Sunrun Prices $629 million Senior Securitization of Residential Solar & Battery Systems

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    SAN FRANCISCO, Jan. 28, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Sunrun (Nasdaq: RUN), the nation’s leading provider of clean energy as a subscription service, today announced it has priced a securitization of leases and power purchase agreements. The securitization is Sunrun’s thirteenth securitization since 2015 and first issuance in 2025.

    “Sunrun’s first securitization transaction of 2025, the second largest in the industry’s history, demonstrates our continued strong execution in the capital markets. Our ability to consistently access deep pools of competitively priced capital to fuel growth is supported by the quality of our assets and our proven track record as an originator and servicer,” said Danny Abajian, Sunrun’s Chief Financial Officer.

    The transaction was structured with three separate classes of A rated notes (the “Class A-1”, “Class A-2A”, and Class “A-2B” respectively and together the “Class A”) and a single class of BB rated notes (the “Class B”), which were retained. The $102.0 million Class A-1 notes and the $276.5 million Class A-2A notes were both marketed in a public asset backed securitization whereas the $250.0 million Class A-2B notes were privately placed. The Class A-1 and Class A-2A notes were oversubscribed and carry coupons of 5.99% and 6.41%, respectively. The Class A-1 notes priced at a spread of 170 bps and a 6.035% yield. The Class A-2A notes priced at a spread of 200 bps and a 6.465% yield. The Class A-1 and Class A-2A have a weighted average spread of 192 bps which represents an improvement of 42 bps from Sunrun’s 2024-3 asset backed securitization in September 2024. The initial balance of the Class A notes represents a 65.3% advance rate on the Securitization Share of ADSAB (present value using a 6% discount rate). The expected weighted average life is 4.58 years for the Class A-1 notes and 7.12 years for the Class A-2A notes. Both classes of notes have an Anticipated Repayment Date of April 30, 2032, and a final maturity date of April 30, 2060.

    Similar to prior transactions, Sunrun anticipates raising additional subordinated subsidiary-level non-recourse financing secured, in part, by the distributions from the retained Class B notes, which is expected to increase the cumulative advance rate obtained by Sunrun.

    The notes are backed by a diversified portfolio of 39,458 systems distributed across 20 states, Washington D.C. and Puerto Rico and 83 utility service territories. The weighted average customer FICO score is 738. The transaction is expected to close by February 5, 2025.

    ATLAS SP Partners (“ATLAS SP”) was the sole structuring agent and served as joint bookrunner along with BofA Securities, Morgan Stanley, MUFG and TD Securities. First Citizens Capital Securities and ING served as co-managers for the securitization.

    “ATLAS SP was pleased to work with Sunrun again as the sole structuring agent on this securitization transaction,” said Spencer Hunsberger, Head of Energy Origination at ATLAS SP. “Through our deep partnership with Sunrun, we have demonstrated ATLAS’ unique capabilities to structure, place and commit to large transactions in an accelerated and efficient process for the capital markets. We look forward to continuing to support Sunrun as the solar industry continues to become more mainstream for securitized products.”

    This press release does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy nor shall there be any sale of these securities in any jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior to registration or qualification under the securities laws of such jurisdiction.

    About Sunrun

    Sunrun Inc. (Nasdaq: RUN) revolutionized the solar industry in 2007 by removing financial barriers and democratizing access to locally-generated, renewable energy. Today, Sunrun is the nation’s leading provider of clean energy as a subscription service, offering residential solar and storage with no upfront costs. Sunrun’s innovative products and solutions can connect homes to the cleanest energy on earth, providing them with energy security, predictability, and peace of mind. Sunrun also manages energy services that benefit communities, utilities, and the electric grid while enhancing customer value. Discover more at www.sunrun.com.

    About ATLAS SP Partners

    ATLAS SP is a global investment firm providing stable capital, financing, advisory and institutional products to market participants seeking innovative and bespoke structured credit and asset backed solutions. We’re proud to build upon a legacy of client excellence that includes certainty of execution, deep expertise and full-service capabilities across the asset management landscape. For more information, visit www.atlas-sp.com.

    Investor & Analyst Contact:
    Patrick Jobin
    SVP, Deputy CFO & Investor Relations Officer
    investors@sunrun.com

    Media Contact:
    Wyatt Semanek
    Director, Corporate Communications
    press@sunrun.com

    ATLAS Contact:
    (212) 355-4449
    atlas-sp@joelefrank.com

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI: First Busey Corporation Announces 2024 Fourth Quarter Earnings

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    CHAMPAIGN, Ill., Jan. 28, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — First Busey Corporation (Nasdaq: BUSE)

    Net Income of $28.1 million
    Diluted EPS of $0.49

    FOURTH QUARTER 2024 HIGHLIGHTS

    • Adjusted net income1 of $30.7 million, or $0.53 per diluted common share
    • Adjusted noninterest income1 of $35.4 million, or 30.3% of total revenue
    • Record high quarterly and annual revenue of $17.0 million and $65.0 million, respectively, for the Wealth Management segment
    • Tangible book value per common share1 of $17.88 at December 31, 2024, compared to $16.62 at December 31, 2023, a year-over-year increase of 7.6%
    • Tangible common equity1 increased to 8.76% of tangible assets at December 31, 2024, compared to 7.75% at December 31, 2023
    • Received stockholder approvals for the CrossFirst Bankshares, Inc. merger in December 2024, followed by remaining requisite regulatory approvals in January 2025

    For additional information, please refer to the 4Q24 Earnings Investor Presentation.

    MESSAGE FROM OUR CHAIRMAN & CEO

    Fourth Quarter Financial Results

    Net income for First Busey Corporation (“Busey,” “Company,” “we,” “us,” or “our”) was $28.1 million for the fourth quarter of 2024, or $0.49 per diluted common share, compared to $32.0 million, or $0.55 per diluted common share, for the third quarter of 2024, and $25.7 million, or $0.46 per diluted common share, for the fourth quarter of 2023. Adjusted net income1, which excludes the impact of acquisition and restructuring expenses, was $30.7 million, or $0.53 per diluted common share, for the fourth quarter of 2024, compared to $33.5 million, or $0.58 per diluted common share, for the third quarter of 2024 and $29.1 million or $0.52 per diluted common share for the fourth quarter of 2023. Annualized return on average assets and annualized return on average tangible common equity1 were 0.93% and 10.86%, respectively, for the fourth quarter of 2024. Annualized adjusted return on average assets1 and annualized adjusted return on average tangible common equity1 were 1.01% and 11.87%, respectively, for the fourth quarter of 2024.

    Taking into account our fourth quarter results, full year 2024 net income and adjusted net income1 were $113.7 million, or $1.98 per diluted common share, and $119.8 million, or $2.08 per diluted common share, respectively. Return on average assets and adjusted return on average assets1 were 0.94% and 0.99%, respectively. Return on average tangible common equity1 and adjusted return on average tangible common equity1 were 11.65% and 12.28%, respectively.

    Full year 2024 net income and adjusted net income1 include $6.1 million of net securities losses and $7.7 million in gains on the sale of mortgage servicing rights. Net income and adjusted net income1 for 2024 were further impacted by a one-time deferred tax valuation adjustment of $1.4 million resulting from a change to our Illinois apportionment rate due to recently enacted regulations. Excluding the tax-effected impact of these items, further adjusted net income1 would have been $120.0 million, equating to adjusted diluted earnings per common share1 of $2.09.

    Pre-provision net revenue1 was $38.8 million for the fourth quarter of 2024, compared to $41.7 million for the third quarter of 2024 and $32.9 million for the fourth quarter of 2023. Pre-provision net revenue to average assets1 was 1.28% for the fourth quarter of 2024, compared to 1.38% for the third quarter of 2024, and 1.06% for the fourth quarter of 2023. Adjusted pre-provision net revenue1 was $42.0 million for the fourth quarter of 2024, compared to $44.1 million for the third quarter of 2024 and $40.2 million for the fourth quarter of 2023. Adjusted pre-provision net revenue to average assets1 was 1.38% for the fourth quarter of 2024, compared to 1.46% for the third quarter of 2024 and 1.30% for the fourth quarter of 2023.

    Taking into account our fourth quarter results, full year 2024 pre-provision net revenue1 and adjusted pre-provision net revenue1 were $168.0 million and $167.3 million, respectively. Pre-provision net revenue to average assets1 and adjusted pre-provision net revenue to average assets1 were each 1.39%.

    Our fee-based businesses continue to add revenue diversification. Total noninterest income was $35.2 million for the fourth quarter of 2024, compared to $35.8 million for the third quarter of 2024 and $31.3 million for the fourth quarter of 2023. Fourth quarter results included $0.2 million in net securities losses. Adjusted noninterest income1 was $35.4 million, or 30.3% of operating revenue1, during the fourth quarter of 2024, compared to $35.0 million, or 29.8% of operating revenue1, for the third quarter of 2024 and $30.5 million, or 28.3% of operating revenue1, for the fourth quarter of 2023. Wealth management fees and wealth management referral income included in other noninterest income contributed $17.0 million and payment technology solutions contributed $5.1 million to our consolidated noninterest income for the fourth quarter of 2024, representing 62.3% of adjusted noninterest income1 on a combined basis.

    For the full year 2024, total noninterest income was $139.7 million. Wealth management fees and wealth management referral income included in other noninterest income contributed $65.0 million and payment technology solutions contributed $22.0 million to our consolidated noninterest income for 2024, representing 63.0% of adjusted noninterest income1 on a combined basis.

    Busey views certain non-operating items, including acquisition-related expenses and restructuring charges, as adjustments to net income reported under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). Non-operating pretax adjustments for acquisition and restructuring expenses1 were $3.6 million in the fourth quarter of 2024. Busey believes that its non-GAAP measures (which are identified with the endnote labeled as 1) facilitate the assessment of its financial results and peer comparability. For more information and a reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures in tabular form, see “Non-GAAP Financial Information.

    We remain focused on prudently managing our expense base and operating efficiency in the current operating environment. Noninterest expense was $78.2 million in the fourth quarter of 2024, compared to $75.9 million in the third quarter of 2024 and $75.0 million in the fourth quarter of 2023. Adjusted core expense1, which excludes the amortization of intangible assets and new markets tax credits, acquisition and restructuring expenses, and the provision for unfunded commitments, was $72.6 million in the fourth quarter of 2024, compared to $71.0 million in the third quarter of 2024 and $65.2 million in the fourth quarter of 2023. The year-over-year comparable period growth in adjusted core expense can be attributed primarily to the acquisition of Merchants and Manufacturers Bank Corporation (“M&M”) and general inflationary pressures on compensation and benefits and to a lesser extent certain other expense categories.

    Quarterly pre-tax expense synergies resulting from our acquisition of M&M are anticipated to be $1.6 million to $1.7 million per quarter when fully realized. Quarterly run-rate savings are projected to be achieved by the first quarter of 2025. During the fourth quarter of 2024, we achieved approximately 86% of the full quarterly savings.

    Planned Partnership with CrossFirst

    On August 26, 2024, Busey and CrossFirst Bankshares, Inc. (“CrossFirst”) entered into an agreement and plan of merger (the “merger agreement”) pursuant to which CrossFirst will merge with and into Busey (the “merger”) and CrossFirst’s wholly-owned subsidiary, CrossFirst Bank, will merge with and into Busey Bank. This partnership will create a premier commercial bank in the Midwest, Southwest, and Florida, with 77 full-service locations across 10 states—Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Missouri, New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Texas—and approximately $20 billion in combined assets, $17 billion in total deposits, $14 billion in total loans, and $14 billion in wealth assets under care.

    Under the terms of the merger agreement, CrossFirst stockholders will have the right to receive for each share of CrossFirst common stock 0.6675 of a share of Busey’s common stock. Upon completion of the transaction, Busey’s stockholders will own approximately 63.5% of the combined company and CrossFirst’s stockholders will own approximately 36.5% of the combined company, on a fully-diluted basis. Busey common stock will continue to trade on the Nasdaq under the “BUSE” stock ticker symbol.

    On December 20, 2024, Busey and CrossFirst stockholders voted to approve the merger. On January 16, 2025, Busey received regulatory approval from the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System for the merger. Busey and CrossFirst intend to close the merger on March 1, 2025, subject to the satisfaction of the remaining customary closing conditions. The transaction has also been approved by the Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation and the Kansas Office of the State Bank Commissioner. The combined holding company will continue to operate under the First Busey Corporation name and the combined bank will operate under the Busey Bank name. It is anticipated that CrossFirst Bank will merge with and into Busey Bank in mid-2025. At the time of the bank merger, CrossFirst Bank locations will become banking centers of Busey Bank. In connection with this merger, Busey incurred one-time pretax acquisition-related expenses of $2.4 million during the fourth quarter of 2024 and $3.9 million for the full year.

    For further details on the merger, see Busey’s Current Report on Form 8‑K announcing the merger, which was filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on August 27, 2024.

    Busey’s Conservative Banking Strategy

    Busey’s financial strength is built on a long-term conservative operating approach. That focus will not change now or in the future.

    The quality of our core deposit franchise is a critical value driver of our institution. Our granular deposit base continues to position us well, with core deposits1 representing 96.5% of our deposits as of December 31, 2024. Our retail deposit base was comprised of more than 251,000 accounts with an average balance of $22 thousand and an average tenure of 16.9 years as of December 31, 2024. Our commercial deposit base was comprised of more than 32,000 accounts with an average balance of $98 thousand and an average tenure of 12.8 years as of December 31, 2024. We estimate that 30% of our deposits were uninsured and uncollateralized2 as of December 31, 2024, and we have sufficient on- and off-balance sheet liquidity to manage deposit fluctuations and the liquidity needs of our customers.

    Asset quality remains strong by both Busey’s historical and current industry trends. Non-performing assets increased to $23.3 million during the fourth quarter of 2024, representing 0.19% of total assets. The increase relates to one Commercial Real Estate loan that was classified in the fourth quarter of 2023 and was moved to non-accrual during the fourth quarter of 2024. This loan carries a remaining balance of $15.0 million following a $3.0 million charge-off in the fourth quarter of 2024. Busey’s results for the fourth quarter of 2024 include a $1.3 million provision expense for credit losses and a $0.5 million provision release for unfunded commitments. The allowance for credit losses was $83.4 million as of December 31, 2024, representing 1.08% of total portfolio loans outstanding, and providing coverage of 3.59 times our non-performing loan balance. Including the charge-off for the Commercial Real Estate loan mentioned above, Busey’s net charge-offs totaled $2.9 million for the fourth quarter of 2024. As of December 31, 2024, our commercial real estate loan portfolio of investor-owned office properties within Central Business District3 areas was minimal at $2.0 million. Our credit performance continues to reflect our highly diversified, conservatively underwritten loan portfolio, which has been originated predominantly to established customers with tenured relationships with our company.

    The strength of our balance sheet is also reflected in our capital foundation. In the fourth quarter of 2024, our Common Equity Tier 1 ratio4 was 14.10% and our Total Capital to Risk Weighted Assets ratio4 was 18.53%. Our regulatory capital ratios continue to provide a buffer of more than $610 million above levels required to be designated well-capitalized. Our Tangible Common Equity ratio1 was 8.76% during the fourth quarter of 2024, compared to 8.96% for the third quarter of 2024 and 7.75% for the fourth quarter of 2023. Busey’s tangible book value per common share1 was $17.88 at December 31, 2024, compared to $18.19 at September 30, 2024, and $16.62 at December 31, 2023, reflecting a 7.6% year-over-year increase. During the fourth quarter of 2024, we paid a common share dividend of $0.24.

    Community Banking

    In the last two months of 2024, Busey offered a new, short-term Express Microloan product, created to help small businesses thrive. With a competitive 4.99% fixed interest rate, flexible terms and loans of up to $10,000, existing Busey customers with business checking accounts were invited to apply—allowing them to manage expenses, refinance debt, invest in new opportunities, and enhance operations. Busey originated more than 100 Express Microloans in 60-days, meeting the needs of our small business customers.

    As we reflect back on 2024 and look ahead to 2025, we feel confident that we are well positioned to produce quality growth and profitability. The pending CrossFirst transaction fits with our acquisition strategy and we are excited to welcome our CrossFirst colleagues into the Busey family. We are grateful for the opportunities to consistently earn the business of our customers, based on the contributions of our talented associates and the continued support of our loyal stockholders.

        Van A. Dukeman
      Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
      First Busey Corporation
    SELECTED FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS (unaudited)
    (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
                       
      Three Months Ended   Years Ended
      December 31,
    2024
      September 30,
    2024
      December 31,
    2023
      December 31,
    2024
      December 31,
    2023
    EARNINGS & PER SHARE AMOUNTS                  
    Net income $ 28,105     $ 32,004     $ 25,749     $ 113,691     $ 122,565  
    Diluted earnings per common share   0.49       0.55       0.46       1.98       2.18  
    Cash dividends paid per share   0.24       0.24       0.24       0.96       0.96  
    Pre-provision net revenue1, 2   38,828       41,744       32,909       167,996       158,502  
    Operating revenue2   116,995       117,688       107,888       460,671       444,034  
                       
    Net income by operating segment:                  
    Banking   30,856       33,221       25,164       117,266       123,853  
    FirsTech   (723 )     (61 )     325       (670 )     830  
    Wealth Management   5,853       5,618       4,233       22,030       18,804  
                       
    AVERAGE BALANCES                  
    Cash and cash equivalents $ 776,572     $ 502,127     $ 608,647     $ 555,281     $ 330,952  
    Investment securities   2,597,309       2,666,269       2,995,223       2,726,488       3,188,815  
    Loans held for sale   6,306       11,539       1,679       8,012       1,885  
    Portfolio loans   7,738,772       7,869,798       7,736,010       7,804,629       7,759,472  
    Interest-earning assets   11,048,350       10,942,745       11,235,326       10,999,424       11,181,010  
    Total assets   12,085,993       12,007,702       12,308,491       12,051,871       12,246,218  
                       
    Noninterest-bearing deposits   2,724,344       2,706,858       2,827,696       2,738,892       3,018,563  
    Interest-bearing deposits   7,325,662       7,296,921       7,545,234       7,301,124       7,052,370  
    Total deposits   10,050,006       10,003,779       10,372,930       10,040,016       10,070,933  
                       
    Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase   135,728       132,688       182,735       147,786       200,894  
    Interest-bearing liabilities   7,763,729       7,731,459       8,054,663       7,763,084       7,825,459  
    Total liabilities   10,689,054       10,643,325       11,106,074       10,709,447       11,048,707  
    Stockholders’ equity – common   1,396,939       1,364,377       1,202,417       1,342,424       1,197,511  
    Tangible common equity2   1,029,539       994,657       846,948       975,823       838,164  
                       
    PERFORMANCE RATIOS                  
    Pre-provision net revenue to average assets1, 2, 3   1.28 %     1.38 %     1.06 %     1.39 %     1.29 %
    Return on average assets3   0.93 %     1.06 %     0.83 %     0.94 %     1.00 %
    Return on average common equity3   8.00 %     9.33 %     8.50 %     8.47 %     10.23 %
    Return on average tangible common equity2, 3   10.86 %     12.80 %     12.06 %     11.65 %     14.62 %
    Net interest margin2, 4   2.95 %     3.02 %     2.75 %     2.95 %     2.89 %
    Efficiency ratio2   64.45 %     62.15 %     66.89 %     61.76 %     61.65 %
    Adjusted noninterest income to operating revenue2   30.27 %     29.77 %     28.31 %     29.97 %     27.79 %
                       
    NON-GAAP FINANCIAL INFORMATION                  
    Adjusted pre-provision net revenue1, 2 $ 41,958     $ 44,104     $ 40,223     $ 167,317     $ 172,290  
    Adjusted net income2   30,725       33,533       29,123       119,805       126,012  
    Adjusted diluted earnings per share2   0.53       0.58       0.52       2.08       2.24  
    Adjusted pre-provision net revenue to average assets2, 3   1.38 %     1.46 %     1.30 %     1.39 %     1.41 %
    Adjusted return on average assets2, 3   1.01 %     1.11 %     0.94 %     0.99 %     1.03 %
    Adjusted return on average tangible common equity2, 3   11.87 %     13.41 %     13.64 %     12.28 %     15.03 %
    Adjusted net interest margin2, 4   2.92 %     2.97 %     2.74 %     2.92 %     2.87 %
    Adjusted efficiency ratio2   61.40 %     60.50 %     62.98 %     61.03 %     60.68 %

    ___________________________________________

    1. Net interest income plus noninterest income, excluding securities gains and losses, less noninterest expense.
    2. See Non-GAAP Financial Information for reconciliation.
    3. For quarterly periods, measures are annualized.
    4. On a tax-equivalent basis, assuming a federal income tax rate of 21%.
    CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (unaudited)
    (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
               
      As of
      December 31,
    2024
      September 30,
    2024
      December 31,
    2023
    ASSETS          
    Cash and cash equivalents $ 697,659     $ 553,709     $ 719,581  
    Debt securities available for sale   1,810,221       1,818,117       2,087,571  
    Debt securities held to maturity   826,630       838,883       872,628  
    Equity securities   15,862       10,315       9,812  
    Loans held for sale   3,657       11,523       2,379  
               
    Commercial loans   5,552,288       5,631,281       5,635,048  
    Retail real estate and retail other loans   2,144,799       2,177,816       2,015,986  
    Portfolio loans   7,697,087       7,809,097       7,651,034  
               
    Allowance for credit losses   (83,404 )     (84,981 )     (91,740 )
    Restricted bank stock   49,930       6,000       6,000  
    Premises and equipment, net   118,820       120,279       122,594  
    Right of use assets   10,608       11,100       11,027  
    Goodwill and other intangible assets, net   365,975       368,249       353,864  
    Other assets   533,677       524,548       538,665  
    Total assets $ 12,046,722     $ 11,986,839     $ 12,283,415  
               
    LIABILITIES & STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY          
    Liabilities          
    Deposits:          
    Noninterest-bearing deposits $ 2,719,907     $ 2,683,543     $ 2,834,655  
    Interest-bearing checking, savings, and money market deposits   5,771,948       5,739,773       5,637,227  
    Time deposits   1,490,635       1,519,925       1,819,274  
    Total deposits   9,982,490       9,943,241       10,291,156  
               
    Securities sold under agreements to repurchase   155,610       128,429       187,396  
    Short-term borrowings               12,000  
    Long-term debt   227,723       227,482       240,882  
    Junior subordinated debt owed to unconsolidated trusts   74,815       74,754       71,993  
    Lease liabilities   11,040       11,470       11,308  
    Other liabilities   211,775       198,579       196,699  
    Total liabilities   10,663,453       10,583,955       11,011,434  
               
    Stockholders’ equity          
    Retained earnings   294,054       279,868       237,197  
    Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)   (207,039 )     (170,913 )     (218,803 )
    Other stockholders’ equity1   1,296,254       1,293,929       1,253,587  
    Total stockholders’ equity   1,383,269       1,402,884       1,271,981  
    Total liabilities & stockholders’ equity $ 12,046,722     $ 11,986,839     $ 12,283,415  
               
    SHARE AND PER SHARE AMOUNTS          
    Book value per common share $ 24.31     $ 24.67     $ 23.02  
    Tangible book value per common share2 $ 17.88     $ 18.19     $ 16.62  
    Ending number of common shares outstanding   56,895,981       56,872,241       55,244,119  

    ___________________________________________

    1. Net balance of common stock ($0.001 par value), additional paid-in capital, and treasury stock.
    2. See Non-GAAP Financial Information for reconciliation.
    CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (unaudited)
    (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
                       
      Three Months Ended   Years Ended
      December 31,
    2024
      September 30,
    2024
      December 31,
    2023
      December 31,
    2024
      December 31,
    2023
    INTEREST INCOME                  
    Interest and fees on loans $ 106,120     $ 111,336     $ 101,425   $ 426,422     $ 385,848  
    Interest and dividends on investment securities   16,788       18,072       20,634     73,970       82,994  
    Dividend income on bank stock   557       106       212     848       1,170  
    Other interest income   7,851       5,092       6,641     22,441       10,531  
    Total interest income $ 131,316     $ 134,606     $ 128,912   $ 523,681     $ 480,543  
                       
    INTEREST EXPENSE                  
    Deposits $ 44,152     $ 46,634     $ 45,409   $ 178,463     $ 123,985  
    Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase   915       981       1,431     4,308       5,203  
    Short-term borrowings   25       26       248     701       12,775  
    Long-term debt   3,183       3,181       3,475     12,950       14,106  
    Junior subordinated debt owed to unconsolidated trusts   1,463       1,137       1,004     4,648       3,853  
    Total interest expense $ 49,738     $ 51,959     $ 51,567   $ 201,070     $ 159,922  
                       
    Net interest income $ 81,578     $ 82,647     $ 77,345   $ 322,611     $ 320,621  
    Provision for credit losses   1,273       2       455     8,590       2,399  
    Net interest income after provision for credit losses $ 80,305     $ 82,645     $ 76,890   $ 314,021     $ 318,222  
                       
    NONINTEREST INCOME                  
    Wealth management fees $ 16,786     $ 15,378     $ 13,715   $ 63,630     $ 57,309  
    Fees for customer services   7,911       8,168       7,484     30,933       29,044  
    Payment technology solutions   5,094       5,265       5,420     21,983       21,192  
    Mortgage revenue   496       355       218     2,075       1,089  
    Income on bank owned life insurance   1,080       1,189       1,019     5,130       4,701  
    Realized net gains (losses) on the sale of mortgage servicing rights         (18 )         7,724        
    Net securities gains (losses)   (196 )     822       761     (6,102 )     (2,199 )
    Other noninterest income   4,050       4,686       2,687     14,309       10,078  
    Total noninterest income $ 35,221     $ 35,845     $ 31,304   $ 139,682     $ 121,214  
                       
    NONINTEREST EXPENSE                  
    Salaries, wages, and employee benefits $ 45,458     $ 44,593     $ 42,730   $ 175,619     $ 162,597  
    Data processing expense   6,564       6,910       6,236     27,124       23,708  
    Net occupancy expense of premises   4,794       4,633       4,318     18,737       18,214  
    Furniture and equipment expense   1,650       1,647       1,694     6,805       6,759  
    Professional fees   4,938       3,118       2,574     12,804       7,147  
    Amortization of intangible assets   2,471       2,548       2,479     10,057       10,432  
    Interchange expense   1,305       1,352       1,355     6,001       6,864  
    FDIC insurance   1,330       1,413       1,167     5,603       5,650  
    Other noninterest expense   9,657       9,712       12,426     37,649       44,161  
    Total noninterest expense $ 78,167     $ 75,926     $ 74,979   $ 300,399     $ 285,532  
                       
    Income before income taxes $ 37,359     $ 42,564     $ 33,215   $ 153,304     $ 153,904  
    Income taxes   9,254       10,560       7,466     39,613       31,339  
    Net income $ 28,105     $ 32,004     $ 25,749   $ 113,691     $ 122,565  
                       
    SHARE AND PER SHARE AMOUNTS                  
    Basic earnings per common share $ 0.49     $ 0.56     $ 0.46   $ 2.01     $ 2.21  
    Diluted earnings per common share $ 0.49     $ 0.55     $ 0.46   $ 1.98     $ 2.18  
    Weighted average number of common shares outstanding, basic   57,061,542       57,033,359       55,403,662     56,610,032       55,432,322  
    Weighted average number of common shares outstanding, diluted   57,934,812       57,967,848       56,333,033     57,543,001       56,256,148  
                                         

    BALANCE SHEET STRENGTH

    Our balance sheet remains a source of strength. Total assets were $12.05 billion as of December 31, 2024, compared to $11.99 billion as of September 30, 2024, and $12.28 billion as of December 31, 2023.

    We remain steadfast in our conservative approach to underwriting and disciplined approach to pricing, particularly given our outlook for the economy in the coming quarters, and this approach has impacted loan growth as predicted. Portfolio loans totaled $7.70 billion at December 31, 2024, compared to $7.81 billion at September 30, 2024, and $7.65 billion at December 31, 2023.

    Average portfolio loans were $7.74 billion for both the fourth quarter of 2024 and the fourth quarter of 2023, compared to $7.87 billion for the third quarter of 2024. Average interest-earning assets were $11.05 billion for the fourth quarter of 2024, compared to $10.94 billion for the third quarter of 2024, and $11.24 billion for the fourth quarter of 2023.

    Total deposits were $9.98 billion at December 31, 2024, compared to $9.94 billion at September 30, 2024, and $10.29 billion at December 31, 2023. Average deposits were $10.05 billion for the fourth quarter of 2024, compared to $10.00 billion for the third quarter of 2024 and $10.37 billion for the fourth quarter of 2023. Deposit fluctuations over the last several quarters were driven by a number of elements, including (1) seasonal factors, including ordinary course public fund flows and fluctuations in the normal course of business operations of certain core commercial customers, (2) the macroeconomic environment, including prevailing interest rates and inflationary pressures, (3) depositors moving some funds to accounts at competitors offering above-market rates, and (4) deposits moving within the Busey ecosystem between deposit accounts and our wealth management group. Core deposits1 accounted for 96.5% of total deposits as of December 31, 2024. Cost of deposits was 1.75% in the fourth quarter of 2024, which represents a decrease of 10 basis points from the third quarter of 2024. Excluding time deposits, Busey’s cost of deposits was 1.38% in the fourth quarter of 2024, a decrease of 12 basis points from the third quarter of 2024. Busey Bank continues to offer savings account specials to customers with larger account balances, with the intention of migrating maturing CDs to these managed rate products. Spot rates on total deposit costs, including noninterest bearing deposits, decreased by 13 basis points from 1.80% at September 30, 2024, to 1.67% at December 31, 2024. Spot rates on interest bearing deposits decreased by 17 basis points from 2.46% at September 30, 2024, to 2.29% at December 31, 2024.

    There were no short term borrowings as of December 31 or September 30, 2024, compared to $12.0 million at December 31, 2023. We had no borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) at the end of the fourth quarter of 2024, the third quarter of 2024, or the fourth quarter of 2023. We have sufficient on- and off-balance sheet liquidity5 to manage deposit fluctuations and the liquidity needs of our customers. As of December 31, 2024, our available sources of on- and off-balance sheet liquidity totaled $6.19 billion. We have executed various deposit campaigns to attract term funding and savings accounts at a lower rate than our marginal cost of funds. New certificate of deposit production in the fourth quarter of 2024 had a weighted average term of 7.6 months at a rate of 3.58%, 128 basis points below our average marginal wholesale equivalent-term funding cost during the quarter. Furthermore, our balance sheet liquidity profile continues to be aided by the cash flows we expect from our relatively short-duration securities portfolio. Those cash flows were approximately $132.5 million in the fourth quarter of 2024. Cash flows from our securities portfolio are expected to be approximately $353.8 million for 2025, with a current book yield of 1.87%, and approximately $288.3 million for 2026, with a current book yield of 2.03%.

    ASSET QUALITY

    Credit quality continues to be strong. Loans 30-89 days past due totaled $8.1 million as of December 31, 2024, compared to $10.1 million as of September 30, 2024, and $5.8 million as of December 31, 2023. Non-performing loans were $23.2 million as of December 31, 2024, compared to $8.2 million as of September 30, 2024, and $7.8 million as of December 31, 2023. The increase relates to one Commercial Real Estate loan that was classified in the fourth quarter of 2023 and was moved to non-accrual during the fourth quarter of 2024. This loan carries a remaining balance of $15.0 million following a $3.0 million charge-off in the fourth quarter of 2024. Continued disciplined credit management resulted in non-performing loans as a percentage of portfolio loans of 0.30% as of December 31, 2024, compared to 0.11% as of September 30, 2024, and 0.10% as of December 31, 2023. Non-performing assets were 0.19% of total assets for the fourth quarter of 2024, compared to 0.07% for the third quarter of 2024 and 0.06% for the fourth quarter of 2023. Our total classified assets were $85.3 million at December 31, 2024, compared to $89.0 million at September 30, 2024, and $72.3 million at December 31, 2023. Our ratio of classified assets to estimated bank Tier 1 capital4 and reserves remains low by historical standards, at 5.6% as of December 31, 2024, compared to 5.9% as of September 30, 2024, and 5.0% as of December 31, 2023.

    Net charge-offs were $2.9 million for the fourth quarter of 2024, compared to $0.2 million for the third quarter of 2024, and $0.4 million for the fourth quarter of 2023. The fourth quarter charge-off relates to the Commercial Real Estate loan mentioned above. The allowance as a percentage of portfolio loans was 1.08% as of December 31, 2024, compared to 1.09% as of September 30, 2024, and 1.20% as of December 31, 2023. The ratio was impacted in 2024 by the acquisition of M&M’s Life Equity Loan® portfolio, as Busey did not record an allowance for credit loss for these loans due to no expected credit loss at default, as permitted under the practical expedient provided within the Accounting Standards Codification 326-20-35-6. The allowance coverage for non-performing loans was 3.59 times as of December 31, 2024, compared to 10.34 times as of September 30, 2024, and 11.74 times as of December 31, 2023.

    Busey maintains a well-diversified loan portfolio and, as a matter of policy and practice, limits concentration exposure in any particular loan segment.

    ASSET QUALITY (unaudited)
    (dollars in thousands)
               
      As of
      December 31,
    2024
      September 30,
    2024
      December 31,
    2023
    Total assets $ 12,046,722     $ 11,986,839     $ 12,283,415  
    Portfolio loans   7,697,087       7,809,097       7,651,034  
    Loans 30 – 89 days past due   8,124       10,141       5,779  
    Non-performing loans:          
    Non-accrual loans   22,088       8,192       7,441  
    Loans 90+ days past due and still accruing   1,149       25       375  
    Non-performing loans $ 23,237     $ 8,217     $ 7,816  
    Non-performing loans, segregated by geography:          
    Illinois / Indiana $ 19,558     $ 3,981     $ 3,715  
    Missouri   3,016       3,530       3,836  
    Florida   663       706       265  
    Other non-performing assets   63       64       125  
    Non-performing assets $ 23,300     $ 8,281     $ 7,941  
               
    Allowance for credit losses $ 83,404     $ 84,981     $ 91,740  
               
    RATIOS          
    Non-performing loans to portfolio loans   0.30 %     0.11 %     0.10 %
    Non-performing assets to total assets   0.19 %     0.07 %     0.06 %
    Non-performing assets to portfolio loans and other non-performing assets   0.30 %     0.11 %     0.10 %
    Allowance for credit losses to portfolio loans   1.08 %     1.09 %     1.20 %
    Coverage ratio of the allowance for credit losses to non-performing loans   3.59 x     10.34 x     11.74 x
    NET CHARGE-OFFS (RECOVERIES) AND PROVISION EXPENSE (RELEASE) (unaudited)
    (dollars in thousands)
                       
      Three Months Ended   Years Ended
      December 31,
    2024
      September 30,
    2024
      December 31,
    2023
      December 31,
    2024
      December 31,
    2023
    Net charge-offs (recoveries) $ 2,850   $ 247   $ 425   $ 18,169   $ 2,267
    Provision expense (release)   1,273     2     455     8,590     2,399
                                 

    NET INTEREST MARGIN AND NET INTEREST INCOME

    Net interest margin1 was 2.95% for the fourth quarter of 2024, compared to 3.02% for the third quarter of 2024 and 2.75% for the fourth quarter of 2023. Excluding purchase accounting accretion, adjusted net interest margin1 was 2.92% for the fourth quarter of 2024, compared to 2.97% in the third quarter of 2024 and 2.74% in the fourth quarter of 2023. Net interest income was $81.6 million in the fourth quarter of 2024, compared to $82.6 million in the third quarter of 2024 and $77.3 million in the fourth quarter of 2023.

    After raising federal funds rates by a total of 525 basis points between March 2022 and July 2023, the Federal Open Market Committee (“FOMC”) lowered rates by 100 basis points beginning in September 2024. In anticipation of the FOMC pivot to an easing cycle, we limited our exposure to term funding structures and intentionally priced savings specials to encourage maturing CD balances to migrate to managed rate non-maturity products. Beginning in September we began lowering rates on special priced deposit accounts and other managed rate products to benefit from the FOMC rate cuts. In addition, approximately 7% of our deposit portfolio is indexed and immediately repriced with the rate cuts by the FOMC. CD balances comprise only 15% of the total deposit funding base. If rates move lower in 2025, we have the ability to reprice CD balances due to the short duration term structure of the portfolio. Approximately 58% of Busey’s non-maturity deposits are at rack rates with a weighted average rate of 0.01%. We continue to offer CD specials with shorter term structures as well as offering attractive premium savings rates to encourage rotation of maturing CD deposits into nimble pricing products. Components of the 7 basis point decrease in net interest margin1 during the fourth quarter of 2024 include:

    • Reduced non-maturity deposit funding costs contributed +9 basis points
    • Increased cash and securities portfolio yield contributed +6 basis points
    • Reduced time deposit funding costs contributed +1 basis point
    • Decreased loan portfolio and held for sale loan yields contributed -20 basis points
    • Decreased purchase accounting contributed -2 basis points
    • Increased borrowing expense -1 basis point

    Based on our most recent Asset Liability Management Committee (“ALCO”) model, a +100 basis point parallel rate shock is expected to increase net interest income by 2.0% over the subsequent twelve-month period. Busey continues to evaluate and execute off-balance sheet hedging and balance sheet restructuring strategies as well as embedding rate protection in our asset originations to provide stabilization to net interest income in lower rate environments. Time deposit and savings specials have provided funding flows, and we had excess earning cash during the fourth quarter of 2024. Our cumulative interest-bearing non-maturity tightening cycle deposit beta peaked at 41% during the third quarter of 2024. Our total deposit beta for the completed tightening cycle was 34%. Since the onset of the current easing cycle, we have reduced our interest-bearing non-maturity deposit cost of funds by 18 basis points, which represents a 26% easing cycle beta. Deposit betas were calculated based on an average federal funds rate of 4.82% during the fourth quarter of 2024. The average federal funds rate has decreased by 68 basis points since the end of the tightening cycle that concluded in the third quarter of 2024.

    NONINTEREST INCOME

    Noninterest income was $35.2 million for the fourth quarter of 2024, as compared to $35.8 million for the third quarter of 2024 and $31.3 million for the fourth quarter of 2023. Excluding the impact of net securities gains and losses and immaterial follow-on adjustments from the previously announced mortgage servicing rights sale, adjusted noninterest income1 was $35.4 million, or 30.3% of operating revenue1, during the fourth quarter of 2024, $35.0 million, or 29.8% of operating revenue, for the third quarter of 2024, and $30.5 million, or 28.3% of operating revenue, for the fourth quarter of 2023.

    Consolidated wealth management fees were $16.8 million for the fourth quarter of 2024, compared to $15.4 million for the third quarter of 2024 and $13.7 million for the fourth quarter of 2023. On a segment basis, Wealth Management generated $17.0 million in revenue during the fourth quarter of 2024, a 22.7% increase over revenue of $13.8 million for the fourth quarter of 2023. Fourth quarter of 2024 results marked a new record high reported quarterly revenue for the Wealth Management operating segment. The Wealth Management operating segment generated net income of $5.9 million in the fourth quarter of 2024, compared to $5.6 million in the third quarter of 2024 and $4.2 million in the fourth quarter of 2023. Busey’s Wealth Management division ended the fourth quarter of 2024 with $13.83 billion in assets under care, compared to $13.69 billion at the end of the third quarter of 2024 and $12.14 billion at the end of the fourth quarter of 2023. Our portfolio management team continues to focus on long-term returns and managing risk in the face of volatile markets and has outperformed its blended benchmark6 over the last three and five years.

    Payment technology solutions revenue was $5.1 million for the fourth quarter of 2024, compared to $5.3 million for the third quarter of 2024 and $5.4 million for the fourth quarter of 2023. Excluding intracompany eliminations, the FirsTech operating segment generated revenue of $5.4 million during the fourth quarter of 2024, compared to $5.6 million in the third quarter of 2024 and $5.8 million in the fourth quarter of 2023.

    Wealth management fees, wealth management referral income included in other noninterest income, and payment technology solutions represented 62.3% of adjusted noninterest income1 for the fourth quarter of 2024.

    Fees for customer services were $7.9 million for the fourth quarter of 2024, compared to $8.2 million in the third quarter of 2024 and $7.5 million in the fourth quarter of 2023.

    Other noninterest income was $4.1 million in the fourth quarter of 2024, compared to $4.7 million in the third quarter of 2024 and $2.7 million in the fourth quarter of 2023. The third quarter of 2024 benefited from $0.8 million in revenue associated with certain wealth management activities that was reported as other noninterest income; in comparison, other noninterest income from wealth management activities was $0.2 million for the fourth quarter of 2024 and $0.1 million for the fourth quarter of 2023. Compared to the prior quarter, we also saw decreases in venture capital income and swap origination fee income, which were mostly offset by increases in commercial loan sales gains. When compared with the fourth quarter of 2023, increases in other noninterest income were primarily attributable to increases in commercial loan sales gains and venture capital income, as well as the addition of Life Equity Loan® servicing income beginning in the second quarter of 2024.

    OPERATING EFFICIENCY

    Noninterest expense was $78.2 million in the fourth quarter of 2024, compared to $75.9 million in the third quarter of 2024 and $75.0 million for the fourth quarter of 2023. The efficiency ratio1 was 64.5% for the fourth quarter of 2024, compared to 62.1% for the third quarter of 2024, and 66.9% for the fourth quarter of 2023. Adjusted core expense1 was $72.6 million in the fourth quarter of 2024, compared to $71.0 million in the third quarter of 2024 and $65.2 million in the fourth quarter of 2023. The adjusted core efficiency ratio1 was 61.8% for the fourth quarter of 2024, compared to 60.2% for the third quarter of 2024, and 60.1% for the fourth quarter of 2023. We expect to continue to prudently manage our expenses and to realize the full extent of M&M acquisition synergies in 2025.

    Noteworthy components of noninterest expense are as follows:

    • Salaries, wages, and employee benefits expenses were $45.5 million in the fourth quarter of 2024, compared to $44.6 million in the third quarter of 2024 and $42.7 million in the fourth quarter of 2023. Busey recorded $0.2 million of non-operating salaries, wages, and employee benefit expenses in the fourth quarter of 2024, compared to $0.1 million in the third quarter of 2024 and $3.8 million in the fourth quarter of 2023. Our associate-base consisted of 1,509 full-time equivalents as of December 31, 2024, compared to 1,510 as of September 30, 2024, and 1,479 as of December 31, 2023. The increase in our associate-base in 2024 was largely due to the M&M acquisition.
    • Data processing expense was $6.6 million in the fourth quarter of 2024, compared to $6.9 million in the third quarter of 2024 and $6.2 million in the fourth quarter of 2023. Busey has continued to make investments in technology enhancements and has also experienced inflation-driven price increases.
    • Professional fees were $4.9 million in the fourth quarter of 2024, compared to $3.1 million in the third quarter of 2024 and $2.6 million in the fourth quarter of 2023. Busey recorded $3.0 million of non-operating professional fees in the fourth quarter of 2024, as compared to $1.4 million in the third quarter of 2024 and $0.4 million in the fourth quarter of 2023. Fourth quarter of 2024 non-operating professional fees consisted of $1.9 million related to merger activities and $1.1 million in restructuring activities related to corporate strategy advisement.
    • Other noninterest expense was $9.7 million for both the third and fourth quarters of 2024, compared to $12.4 million in the fourth quarter of 2023. Busey recorded $0.3 million of non-operating costs in other noninterest expense in the fourth quarter of 2024, compared to $0.4 million in the third quarter of 2024 and $0.1 million in the fourth quarter of 2023. In connection with Busey’s adoption of ASU 2023-02 on January 1, 2024, Busey began recording amortization of New Markets Tax Credits as income tax expense instead of other operating expense, which resulted in a decrease to other operating expenses of $2.3 million compared to the fourth quarter of 2023. Other items contributing to the fluctuations in other noninterest expense included the provision for unfunded commitments, mortgage servicing rights valuation expenses, fixed asset impairment, marketing, business development, and expenses related to recruiting and onboarding.

    Busey’s effective tax rate for the fourth quarter of 2024 was 24.8%, which was lower than the combined federal and state statutory rate of approximately 28.0% due to the impact of tax exempt interest income, such as municipal bond interest, bank owned life insurance income, and investments in various federal and state tax credits. Busey’s effective tax rate for the full year 2024 was 25.8%. In the second quarter of 2024, Busey recorded a one-time deferred tax valuation adjustment of $1.4 million resulting from a change to our Illinois apportionment rate due to recently enacted regulations. These newly enacted regulations are expected to lower our tax obligation in future periods. Excluding the impact of the one-time deferred tax valuation adjustment, our effective tax rate for the full year 2024 would have been 24.9%.

    Effective tax rates were higher in 2024, compared to 2023, due to the adoption of ASU 2023-02 in January 2024. Upon adoption of ASU 2023-02 Busey elected to use the proportional amortization method of accounting for equity investments made primarily for the purpose of receiving income tax credits. The proportional amortization method results in the cost of the investment being amortized in proportion to the income tax credits and other income tax benefits received, with the amortization of the investment and the income tax credits being presented net in the income statement as a component of income tax expense as opposed to being presented on a gross basis on the income statement as a component of noninterest expense and income tax expense.

    CAPITAL STRENGTH

    Busey’s strong capital levels, coupled with its earnings, have allowed the Company to provide a steady return to its stockholders through dividends. On January 31, 2025, Busey will pay a cash dividend of $0.25 per common share to stockholders of record as of January 24, 2025, which represents a 4.2% increase from the previous quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Busey has consistently paid dividends to its common stockholders since the bank holding company was organized in 1980.

    As of December 31, 2024, Busey continued to exceed the capital adequacy requirements necessary to be considered “well-capitalized” under applicable regulatory guidelines. Busey’s Common Equity Tier 1 ratio is estimated4 to be 14.10% at December 31, 2024, compared to 13.78% at September 30, 2024, and 13.09% at December 31, 2023. Our Total Capital to Risk Weighted Assets ratio is estimated4 to be 18.53% at December 31, 2024, compared to 18.19% at September 30, 2024, and 17.44% at December 31, 2023.

    Busey’s tangible common equity1 was $1.02 billion at December 31, 2024, compared to $1.04 billion at September 30, 2024, and $925.0 million at December 31, 2023. Tangible common equity1 represented 8.76% of tangible assets at December 31, 2024, compared to 8.96% at September 30, 2024, and 7.75% at December 31, 2023. Busey’s tangible book value per common share1 was $17.88 at December 31, 2024, compared to $18.19 at September 30, 2024, and $16.62 at December 31, 2023, reflecting a 7.6% year-over-year increase. The ratios of tangible common equity to tangible assets1 and tangible book value per common share have been impacted by the fair value adjustment of Busey’s securities portfolio as a result of the current rate environment, which is reflected in the accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) component of stockholder’s equity.

    FOURTH QUARTER EARNINGS INVESTOR PRESENTATION

    For additional information on Busey’s financial condition and operating results, please refer to the Q4 2024 Earnings Investor Presentation furnished via Form 8-K on January 28, 2025, in connection with this earnings release.

    CORPORATE PROFILE

    As of December 31, 2024, First Busey Corporation (Nasdaq: BUSE) was an $12.05 billion financial holding company headquartered in Champaign, Illinois.

    Busey Bank, a wholly-owned bank subsidiary of First Busey Corporation, had total assets of $12.01 billion as of December 31, 2024, and is headquartered in Champaign, Illinois. Busey Bank currently has 62 banking centers, with 21 in Central Illinois markets, 17 in suburban Chicago markets, 20 in the St. Louis Metropolitan Statistical Area, three in Southwest Florida, and one in Indianapolis. More information about Busey Bank can be found at busey.com.

    Through Busey’s Wealth Management division, the Company provides a full range of asset management, investment, brokerage, fiduciary, philanthropic advisory, tax preparation, and farm management services to individuals, businesses, and foundations. Assets under care totaled $13.83 billion as of December 31, 2024. More information about Busey’s Wealth Management services can be found at busey.com/wealth-management.

    Busey Bank’s wholly-owned subsidiary, FirsTech, specializes in the evolving financial technology needs of small and medium-sized businesses, highly regulated enterprise industries, and financial institutions. FirsTech provides comprehensive and innovative payment technology solutions, including online, mobile, and voice-recognition bill payments; money and data movement; merchant services; direct debit services; lockbox remittance processing for payments made by mail; and walk-in payments at retail agents. Additionally, FirsTech simplifies client workflows through integrations enabling support with billing, reconciliation, bill reminders, and treasury services. More information about FirsTech can be found at firstechpayments.com.

    For the first time, Busey was named among the World’s Best Banks for 2024 by Forbes, earning a spot on the list among 68 U.S. banks and 403 banks worldwide. Additionally, Busey Bank was honored to be named among America’s Best Banks by Forbes magazine for the third consecutive year. Ranked 40th overall in 2024, Busey was the second-ranked bank headquartered in Illinois of the six banks that made this year’s list and the highest-ranked bank of those with more than $10 billion in assets. Busey is humbled to be named among the 2024 Best Banks to Work For by American Banker, the 2024 Best Places to Work in Money Management by Pensions and Investments, the 2024 Best Places to Work in Illinois by Daily Herald Business Ledger, the 2024 Best Places to Work in Indiana by the Indiana Chamber of Commerce, and the 2024 Best Companies to Work For in Florida by Florida Trend magazine. We are honored to be consistently recognized globally, nationally and locally for our engaged culture of integrity and commitment to community development.

    For more information about us, visit busey.com.

    Category: Financial
    Source: First Busey Corporation

    Contacts:

    Jeffrey D. Jones, Chief Financial Officer
    217-365-4130

    NON-GAAP FINANCIAL INFORMATION

    This earnings release contains certain financial information determined by methods other than GAAP. Management uses these non-GAAP measures, together with the related GAAP measures, in analysis of Busey’s performance and in making business decisions, as well as for comparison to Busey’s peers. Busey believes the adjusted measures are useful for investors and management to understand the effects of certain non-core and non-recurring noninterest items and provide additional perspective on Busey’s performance over time.

    Below is a reconciliation to what management believes to be the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures—specifically, net interest income, total noninterest income, net security gains and losses, and total noninterest expense in the case of pre-provision net revenue, adjusted pre-provision net revenue, pre-provision net revenue to average assets, and adjusted pre-provision net revenue to average assets; net income in the case of adjusted net income, adjusted diluted earnings per share, adjusted return on average assets, average tangible common equity, return on average tangible common equity, adjusted return on average tangible common equity; net income and net security gains and losses in the case of further adjusted net income and further adjusted diluted earnings per share; net interest income in the case of adjusted net interest income and adjusted net interest margin; net interest income, total noninterest income, and total noninterest expense in the case of adjusted noninterest income, adjusted noninterest expense, noninterest expense excluding non-operating adjustments, adjusted core expense, efficiency ratio, adjusted efficiency ratio, and adjusted core efficiency ratio; net interest income, total noninterest income, net securities gains and losses, and net gains and losses on the sale of mortgage servicing rights in the case of operating revenue and adjusted noninterest income to operating revenue; total assets and goodwill and other intangible assets in the case of tangible assets; total stockholders’ equity in the case of tangible book value per common share; total assets and total stockholders’ equity in the case of tangible common equity and tangible common equity to tangible assets; and total deposits in the case of core deposits and core deposits to total deposits.

    These non-GAAP disclosures have inherent limitations and are not audited. They should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for operating results reported in accordance with GAAP, nor are they necessarily comparable to non-GAAP performance measures that may be presented by other companies. Tax effected numbers included in these non-GAAP disclosures are based on estimated statutory rates, estimated federal income tax rates, or effective tax rates, as noted with the tables below.

    RECONCILIATION OF NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES (Unaudited)
     
    Pre-Provision Net Revenue and Related Measures
                         
        Three Months Ended   Years Ended
    (dollars in thousands)   December 31,
    2024
      September 30,
    2024
      December 31,
    2023
      December 31,
    2024
      December 31,
    2023
    Net interest income (GAAP)   $ 81,578     $ 82,647     $ 77,345     $ 322,611     $ 320,621  
    Total noninterest income (GAAP)     35,221       35,845       31,304       139,682       121,214  
    Net security (gains) losses (GAAP)     196       (822 )     (761 )     6,102       2,199  
    Total noninterest expense (GAAP)     (78,167 )     (75,926 )     (74,979 )     (300,399 )     (285,532 )
    Pre-provision net revenue (Non-GAAP) [a]   38,828       41,744       32,909       167,996       158,502  
    Acquisition and restructuring expenses     3,585       1,935       4,237       8,140       4,328  
    Provision for unfunded commitments     (455 )     407       818       (1,095 )     461  
    Amortization of New Markets Tax Credits                 2,259             8,999  
    Realized (gain) loss on the sale of mortgage service rights           18             (7,724 )      
    Adjusted pre-provision net revenue (Non-GAAP) [b] $ 41,958     $ 44,104     $ 40,223     $ 167,317     $ 172,290  
                         
    Average total assets (GAAP) [c]   12,085,993       12,007,702       12,308,491       12,051,871       12,246,218  
                         
    Pre-provision net revenue to average total assets (Non-GAAP)1 [a÷c]   1.28 %     1.38 %     1.06 %     1.39 %     1.29 %
    Adjusted pre-provision net revenue to average total assets (Non-GAAP)1 [b÷c]   1.38 %     1.46 %     1.30 %     1.39 %     1.41 %

    ___________________________________________

    1. For quarterly periods, measures are annualized.
     
    Adjusted Net Income, Average Tangible Common Equity, and Related Ratios
                         
        Three Months Ended   Years Ended
    (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)   December 31,
    2024
      September 30,
    2024
      December 31,
    2023
      December 31,
    2024
      December 31,
    2023
    Net income (GAAP) [a] $ 28,105     $ 32,004     $ 25,749     $ 113,691     $ 122,565  
    Acquisition expenses:                    
    Salaries, wages, and employee benefits     247       73             1,457        
    Data processing     14       90             548        
    Professional fees, occupancy, furniture and fixtures, and other     2,208       1,772       266       4,896       357  
    Restructuring expenses:                    
    Salaries, wages, and employee benefits                 3,760       123       3,760  
    Professional fees, occupancy, furniture and fixtures, and other     1,116             211       1,116       211  
    Acquisition and restructuring expenses     3,585       1,935       4,237       8,140       4,328  
    Related tax benefit1     (965 )     (406 )     (863 )     (2,026 )     (881 )
    Adjusted net income (Non-GAAP) [b] $ 30,725     $ 33,533     $ 29,123     $ 119,805     $ 126,012  
                         
    Weighted average number of common shares outstanding, diluted (GAAP) [c]   57,934,812       57,967,848       56,333,033       57,543,001       56,256,148  
    Diluted earnings per common share (GAAP) [a÷c] $ 0.49     $ 0.55     $ 0.46     $ 1.98     $ 2.18  
    Adjusted diluted earnings per common share (Non-GAAP) [b÷c] $ 0.53     $ 0.58     $ 0.52     $ 2.08     $ 2.24  
                         
    Average total assets (GAAP) [d]   12,085,993       12,007,702       12,308,491       12,051,871       12,246,218  
    Return on average assets (GAAP)2 [a÷d]   0.93 %     1.06 %     0.83 %     0.94 %     1.00 %
    Adjusted return on average assets (Non-GAAP)2 [b÷d]   1.01 %     1.11 %     0.94 %     0.99 %     1.03 %
                         
    Average common equity (GAAP)   $ 1,396,939     $ 1,364,377     $ 1,202,417     $ 1,342,424     $ 1,197,511  
    Average goodwill and other intangible assets, net     (367,400 )     (369,720 )     (355,469 )     (366,601 )     (359,347 )
    Average tangible common equity (Non-GAAP) [e] $ 1,029,539     $ 994,657     $ 846,948     $ 975,823     $ 838,164  
                         
    Return on average tangible common equity (Non-GAAP)2 [a÷e]   10.86 %     12.80 %     12.06 %     11.65 %     14.62 %
    Adjusted return on average tangible common equity (Non-GAAP)2 [b÷e]   11.87 %     13.41 %     13.64 %     12.28 %     15.03 %

    ___________________________________________

    1. Year-to-date tax benefits were calculated by multiplying year-to-date acquisition and restructuring expenses by tax rates of 24.9% and 20.4% for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. Quarterly tax benefits were calculated as the year-to-date tax benefit amounts less the sum of amounts applied to previous quarters during the year, equating to tax rates of 26.9%, 21.0%, and 20.4% for the three months ended December 31, 2024, September 30, 2024, and December 31, 2023, respectively.
    2. For quarterly periods, measures are annualized.
    Further Adjusted Net Income and Related Measures
                         
        Three Months Ended   Years Ended
    (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)   December 31,
    2024
      September 30,
    2024
      December 31,
    2023
      December 31,
    2024
      December 31,
    2023
    Adjusted net income (Non-GAAP)1   $ 30,725     $ 33,533     $ 29,123     $ 119,805     $ 126,012  
    Further non-GAAP adjustments:                    
    Net securities (gains) losses     196       (822 )     (761 )     6,102       2,199  
    Realized net (gains) losses on the sale of mortgage servicing rights           18             (7,724 )      
    Tax effect for further non-GAAP adjustments2     (49 )     199       171       419       (448 )
    Tax effected further non-GAAP adjustments3     147       (605 )     (590 )     (1,203 )     1,751  
    Further adjusted net income (Non-GAAP)3 [a] $ 30,872     $ 32,928     $ 28,533     $ 118,602     $ 127,763  
    One-time deferred tax valuation adjustment4                       1,446        
    Further adjusted net income, excluding one-time deferred tax valuation adjustment (Non-GAAP)3 [b] $ 30,872     $ 32,928     $ 28,533     $ 120,048     $ 127,763  
                         
    Weighted average number of common shares outstanding, diluted [c]   57,934,812       57,967,848       56,333,033       57,543,001       56,256,148  
                         
    Further adjusted diluted earnings per common share (Non-GAAP)3 [a÷c] $ 0.53     $ 0.57     $ 0.51     $ 2.06     $ 2.27  
    Further adjusted diluted earnings per common share, excluding one-time deferred tax valuation adjustment (Non-GAAP)3 [b÷c] $ 0.53     $ 0.57     $ 0.51     $ 2.09     $ 2.27  

    ___________________________________________

    1. Adjusted net income is a non-GAAP measure. See the previous table for a reconciliation to the nearest GAAP measure.
    2. Tax effects for further non-GAAP adjustments were calculated by multiplying further non-GAAP adjustments by the effective income tax rate for each period. Effective income tax rates that were used to calculate the tax effect were 24.8%, 24.8%, and 22.5% for the three months ended December 31, 2024, September 30, 2024, and December 31, 2023, respectively, and were 25.8% and 20.4% for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.
    3. Tax-effected measure.
    4. An estimated one-time deferred tax valuation adjustment of $1.4 million resulted from a change to our Illinois apportionment rate due to recently enacted regulations.
    Tax-Equivalent Net Interest Income, Adjusted Net Interest Income, Net Interest Margin, and Adjusted Net Interest Margin
                         
        Three Months Ended   Years Ended
    (dollars in thousands)   December 31,
    2024
      September 30,
    2024
      December 31,
    2023
      December 31,
    2024
      December 31,
    2023
    Net interest income (GAAP)   $ 81,578     $ 82,647     $ 77,345     $ 322,611     $ 320,621  
    Tax-equivalent adjustment1     446       396       501       1,693       2,173  
    Tax-equivalent net interest income (Non-GAAP) [a]   82,024       83,043       77,846       324,304       322,794  
    Purchase accounting accretion related to business combinations     (812 )     (1,338 )     (384 )     (3,166 )     (1,477 )
    Adjusted net interest income (Non-GAAP) [b] $ 81,212     $ 81,705     $ 77,462     $ 321,138     $ 321,317  
                         
    Average interest-earning assets (GAAP) [c]   11,048,350       10,942,745       11,235,326       10,999,424       11,181,010  
                         
    Net interest margin (Non-GAAP)2 [a÷c]   2.95 %     3.02 %     2.75 %     2.95 %     2.89 %
    Adjusted net interest margin (Non-GAAP)2 [b÷c]   2.92 %     2.97 %     2.74 %     2.92 %     2.87 %

    ___________________________________________

    1. Tax-equivalent adjustments were calculated using an estimated federal income tax rate of 21%, applied to non-taxable interest income on investments and loans.
    2. For quarterly periods, measures are annualized.
    Adjusted Noninterest Income, Revenue Measures, Adjusted Noninterest Expense, Adjusted Core Expense, and Efficiency Ratios
                         
        Three Months Ended   Years Ended
    (dollars in thousands)   December 31,
    2024
      September 30,
    2024
      December 31,
    2023
      December 31,
    2024
      December 31,
    2023
    Net interest income (GAAP) [a] $ 81,578     $ 82,647     $ 77,345     $ 322,611     $ 320,621  
    Tax-equivalent adjustment1     446       396       501       1,693       2,173  
    Tax-equivalent net interest income (Non-GAAP) [b]   82,024       83,043       77,846       324,304       322,794  
                         
    Total noninterest income (GAAP)     35,221       35,845       31,304       139,682       121,214  
    Net security (gains) losses (GAAP)     196       (822 )     (761 )     6,102       2,199  
    Noninterest income excluding net securities gains and losses (Non-GAAP) [c]   35,417       35,023       30,543       145,784       123,413  
    Realized net (gains) losses on the sale of mortgage servicing rights (GAAP)           18             (7,724 )      
    Adjusted noninterest income (Non-GAAP) [d] $ 35,417     $ 35,041     $ 30,543     $ 138,060     $ 123,413  
                         
    Tax-equivalent revenue (Non-GAAP) [e = b+c] $ 117,441     $ 118,066     $ 108,389     $ 470,088     $ 446,207  
    Adjusted tax-equivalent revenue (Non-GAAP) [f = b+d]   117,441       118,084       108,389       462,364       446,207  
    Operating revenue (Non-GAAP) [g = a+d]   116,995       117,688       107,888       460,671       444,034  
                         
    Adjusted noninterest income to operating revenue (Non-GAAP) [d÷g]   30.27 %     29.77 %     28.31 %     29.97 %     27.79 %
                         
    Total noninterest expense (GAAP)   $ 78,167     $ 75,926     $ 74,979     $ 300,399     $ 285,532  
    Amortization of intangible assets (GAAP) [h]   (2,471 )     (2,548 )     (2,479 )     (10,057 )     (10,432 )
    Noninterest expense excluding amortization of intangible assets (Non-GAAP) [i]   75,696       73,378       72,500       290,342       275,100  
    Non-operating adjustments:                    
    Salaries, wages, and employee benefits     (247 )     (73 )     (3,760 )     (1,580 )     (3,760 )
    Data processing     (14 )     (90 )           (548 )      
    Professional fees, occupancy, furniture and fixtures, and other     (3,324 )     (1,772 )     (477 )     (6,012 )     (568 )
    Adjusted noninterest expense (Non-GAAP) [j]   72,111       71,443       68,263       282,202       270,772  
    Provision for unfunded commitments     455       (407 )     (818 )     1,095       (461 )
    Amortization of New Markets Tax Credits                 (2,259 )           (8,999 )
    Adjusted core expense (Non-GAAP) [k] $ 72,566     $ 71,036     $ 65,186     $ 283,297     $ 261,312  
                         
    Noninterest expense, excluding non-operating adjustments (Non-GAAP) [j-h] $ 74,582     $ 73,991     $ 70,742     $ 292,259     $ 281,204  
                         
    Efficiency ratio (Non-GAAP) [i÷e]   64.45 %     62.15 %     66.89 %     61.76 %     61.65 %
    Adjusted efficiency ratio (Non-GAAP) [j÷f]   61.40 %     60.50 %     62.98 %     61.03 %     60.68 %
    Adjusted core efficiency ratio (Non-GAAP) [k÷f]   61.79 %     60.16 %     60.14 %     61.27 %     58.56 %

    ___________________________________________

    1. Tax-equivalent adjustments were calculated using an estimated federal income tax rate of 21%, applied to non-taxable interest income on investments and loans.
    Tangible Book Value and Tangible Book Value Per Common Share
                 
        As of
    (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)   December 31,
    2024
      September 30,
    2024
      December 31,
    2023
    Total stockholders’ equity (GAAP)   $ 1,383,269     $ 1,402,884     $ 1,271,981  
    Goodwill and other intangible assets, net (GAAP)     (365,975 )     (368,249 )     (353,864 )
    Tangible book value (Non-GAAP) [a] $ 1,017,294     $ 1,034,635     $ 918,117  
                 
    Ending number of common shares outstanding (GAAP) [b]   56,895,981       56,872,241       55,244,119  
                 
    Tangible book value per common share (Non-GAAP) [a÷b] $ 17.88     $ 18.19     $ 16.62  
    Tangible Assets, Tangible Common Equity, and Tangible Common Equity to Tangible Assets
                 
        As of
    (dollars in thousands)   December 31,
    2024
      September 30,
    2024
      December 31,
    2023
    Total assets (GAAP)   $ 12,046,722     $ 11,986,839     $ 12,283,415  
    Goodwill and other intangible assets, net (GAAP)     (365,975 )     (368,249 )     (353,864 )
    Tax effect of other intangible assets1     6,379       7,178       6,888  
    Tangible assets (Non-GAAP)2 [a] $ 11,687,126     $ 11,625,768     $ 11,936,439  
                 
    Total stockholders’ equity (GAAP)   $ 1,383,269     $ 1,402,884     $ 1,271,981  
    Goodwill and other intangible assets, net (GAAP)     (365,975 )     (368,249 )     (353,864 )
    Tax effect of other intangible assets1     6,379       7,178       6,888  
    Tangible common equity (Non-GAAP)2 [b] $ 1,023,673     $ 1,041,813     $ 925,005  
                 
    Tangible common equity to tangible assets (Non-GAAP)2 [b÷a]   8.76 %     8.96 %     7.75 %

    ___________________________________________

    1. Net of estimated deferred tax liability, calculated using an estimated tax rate of 26.73% as of December 31, 2024, and 28% as of September 30, 2024, and December 31, 2023.
    2. Tax-effected measure.
    Core Deposits and Related Ratios
                 
        As of
    (dollars in thousands)   December 31,
    2024
      September 30,
    2024
      December 31,
    2023
    Portfolio loans (GAAP) [a] $ 7,697,087     $ 7,809,097     $ 7,651,034  
                 
    Total deposits (GAAP) [b] $ 9,982,490     $ 9,943,241     $ 10,291,156  
    Brokered deposits, excluding brokered time deposits of $250,000 or more     (13,090 )     (13,089 )     (6,001 )
    Time deposits of $250,000 or more     (334,503 )     (338,808 )     (386,286 )
    Core deposits (Non-GAAP) [c] $ 9,634,897     $ 9,591,344     $ 9,898,869  
                 
    RATIOS            
    Core deposits to total deposits (Non-GAAP) [c÷b]   96.52 %     96.46 %     96.19 %
    Portfolio loans to core deposits (Non-GAAP) [a÷c]   79.89 %     81.42 %     77.29 %
                             

    FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

    This press release may contain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 with respect to Busey’s financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance, and business. Forward-looking statements, which may be based upon beliefs, expectations and assumptions of Busey’s management and on information currently available to management, are generally identifiable by the use of words such as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “intend,” “estimate,” “may,” “will,” “would,” “could,” “should,” “position,” or other similar expressions. Additionally, all statements in this document, including forward-looking statements, speak only as of the date they are made, and Busey undertakes no obligation to update any statement in light of new information or future events.

    A number of factors, many of which are beyond Busey’s ability to control or predict, could cause actual results to differ materially from those in any forward-looking statements. These factors include, among others, the following: (1) risks related to the proposed transaction with CrossFirst, including (i) the possibility that the proposed transaction will not close when expected or at all because conditions to the closing are not satisfied on a timely basis or at all; (ii) the possibility that the anticipated benefits of the proposed transaction will not be realized when expected or at all, including as a result of the impact of, or problems arising from, the integration of the two companies or as a result of the strength of the economy and competitive factors in the areas where Busey and CrossFirst do business; (iii) the possibility that the merger may be more expensive to complete than anticipated, including as a result of unexpected factors or events; (iv) diversion of management’s attention from ongoing business operations and opportunities; (v) the possibility that Busey may be unable to achieve expected synergies and operating efficiencies in the merger within the expected timeframes or at all, and to successfully integrate CrossFirst’s operations with those of Busey or that such integration may be more difficult, time consuming or costly than expected; (vi) revenues following the proposed transaction may be lower than expected; and (vii) stockholder litigation that could prevent or delay the closing of the proposed transaction or otherwise negatively impact our business and operations; (2) the strength of the local, state, national, and international economies and financial markets (including effects of inflationary pressures and supply chain constraints); (3) effects on the U.S. economy resulting from the implementation of policies proposed by the new presidential administration, including tariffs, mass deportations, and tax regulations; (4) the economic impact of any future terrorist threats or attacks, widespread disease or pandemics, or other adverse external events that could cause economic deterioration or instability in credit markets (including Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and the conflict in the Middle East); (5) changes in state and federal laws, regulations, and governmental policies concerning Busey’s general business (including changes in response to the failures of other banks or as a result changes in policies implemented by the new presidential administration); (6) changes in accounting policies and practices; (7) changes in interest rates and prepayment rates of Busey’s assets (including the impact of sustained elevated interest rates); (8) increased competition in the financial services sector (including from non-bank competitors such as credit unions and fintech companies) and the inability to attract new customers; (9) changes in technology and the ability to develop and maintain secure and reliable electronic systems; (10) the loss of key executives or associates; (11) changes in consumer spending; (12) unexpected outcomes of existing or new litigation, investigations, or inquiries involving Busey (including with respect to Busey’s Illinois franchise taxes); (13) fluctuations in the value of securities held in Busey’s securities portfolio; (14) concentrations within Busey’s loan portfolio (including commercial real estate loans), large loans to certain borrowers, and large deposits from certain clients; (15) the concentration of large deposits from certain clients who have balances above current FDIC insurance limits and may withdraw deposits to diversify their exposure; (16) the level of non-performing assets on Busey’s balance sheets; (17) interruptions involving information technology and communications systems or third-party servicers; (18) breaches or failures of information security controls or cybersecurity-related incidents; and (19) the economic impact of exceptional weather occurrences such as tornadoes, hurricanes, floods, blizzards, and droughts. These risks and uncertainties should be considered in evaluating forward-looking statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements.

    Additional information concerning Busey and its business, including additional factors that could materially affect Busey’s financial results, is included in Busey’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

    END NOTES

    1 Represents a non-GAAP financial measure. For a reconciliation to the most directly comparable financial measure calculated and presented in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”), see Non-GAAP Financial Information.”
    2 Estimated uninsured and uncollateralized deposits consist of account balances in excess of the $250 thousand FDIC insurance limit, less intercompany accounts and collateralized accounts (including preferred deposits).
    3 Central Business District areas within Busey’s footprint include downtown St. Louis, downtown Indianapolis, and downtown Chicago.
    4 Capital amounts and ratios for the fourth quarter of 2024 are not yet finalized and are subject to change.
    5 On- and off-balance sheet liquidity is comprised of cash and cash equivalents, debt securities excluding those pledged as collateral, brokered deposits, and Busey’s borrowing capacity through its revolving credit facility, the FHLB, the Federal Reserve Bank, and federal funds purchased lines.
    6 The blended benchmark consists of 60% MSCI All Country World Index and 40% Bloomberg Intermediate US Government/Credit Total Return Index.

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI: CrossFirst Bankshares, Inc. Reports Record Fourth Quarter and Record Full Year 2024 Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    LEAWOOD, Kan., Jan. 28, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — CrossFirst Bankshares, Inc. (Nasdaq: CFB), the bank holding company for CrossFirst Bank, today reported operating results for the fourth quarter and full-year ended December 31, 2024.

    The fourth quarter and full-year earnings release can be viewed here: https://investors.crossfirstbankshares.com/financials/quarterly-reports

    Investor Contact
    Mike Daley | CrossFirst Bankshares, Inc.
    913.754.9707 | mike.daley@crossfirstbank.com

    About CrossFirst Bankshares, Inc.

    CrossFirst Bankshares, Inc. (Nasdaq: CFB) is a Kansas corporation and a registered bank holding company for its wholly owned subsidiary, CrossFirst Bank, a full-service financial institution that offers products and services to businesses, professionals, individuals, and families. CrossFirst Bank, headquartered in Leawood, Kansas, has locations in Kansas, Missouri, Oklahoma, Texas, Arizona, Colorado, and New Mexico.

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI Submissions: Business – Consultants And Interim Managers Launch BRICS Network

    Source: German Technology & Engineering Corporation (GTEC)

    Karlheinz Zuerl, Interim Manager of the Year 2024*, has set up an international business network to bridge the gap between Western industrialized nations and the BRICS countries.

    Berlin, January 28 2025 – A new international network of consultants and interim managers has been launched under the name “BRICS Project Network” to support Western companies in expanding their business in BRICS countries and vice versa. “The BRICS nations account for nearly half of the global population and produce over a third of the world’s economic output, surpassing the G7 countries,” explained Karlheinz Zuerl, CEO of the German Technology & Engineering Corporation (GTEC) based in Shanghai, China, which spearheads this initiative.

    Karlheinz Zuerl said: “The further development of economic relations between the Western industrialized nations and the BRICS community helps all parties involved. The new network reportedly includes China, Hong Kong, India and Southeast Asia (Malaysia, Indonesia, Vietnam, Thailand), the United Arab Emirates, Iran, Brazil and South America, Mexico, Canada (USMCA customs union), Russia, Eastern Europe and a number of African countries in the global south, such as South Africa, Ethiopia and Egypt.

    Wide Range Of Services

    Acting as a “bridge-builder” between these countries and the Western industrialized world, the new network offers a wide range of services: Management Consulting, Business Development, Project Management, Interim Management, Training and Education. Karlheinz Zuerl gave specific examples: “We carry out market analyses, set up international sales networks, initiate business partnerships and takeovers, represent companies at trade fairs and other events, take care of organizational development, look after human resources, set up branches on behalf of companies, carry out relocations and company transfers, optimize finances and local production and carry out restructuring to improve earnings.”

    According to the information provided, the consultants and managers in the network have many years of experience in a wide range of sectors. Examples given include: Manufacturing, automotive, mechanical and plant engineering, construction, electrical and electronics, domestic appliances, environmental technology, information technology, pharmaceuticals and communications technology. If required, interim managers can take on operational roles such as general management, commercial management, project or quality management, research and development, human resources and finance, sales and marketing or change management.

    Trade Disputes And Sanctions Weigh On Relations

    Trade disputes between the US and China and sanctions against Russia are putting a strain on economic relations. The economic relationship between the Western industrialized nations and the BRICS countries is under severe strain. These tensions have led the BRICS to seek alternatives to reduce their dependence on Western financial systems, for example by discussing a common currency or reducing the use of the US dollar in trade.

    “We are not politicians,” said Karlheinz Zuerl, “but business consultants and interim managers who build cross-border business relationships and investments that benefit all parties. Given the geopolitical tensions, the enormous economic potential for both parties is often underestimated. With experienced professionals like those in our network, this potential can be realized.”

    He points out that a number of BRICS countries play an important role in technological development, as attractive manufacturing locations and as suppliers of raw materials and energy to the Western industrial world. Without China, India, Russia and Brazil, the Western economy would be much poorer,” said Karlheinz Zuerl, underlining the importance of the BRICS countries today.

    * Karlheinz Zuerl was honoured by United Interim, the leading community for interim managers in Germany, Austria and Switzerland, and Steinbeis Augsburg Business School.

    GTEC (https://gtec.asia) helps Western industrial companies to overcome challenges in Asia. The focus is on business development, the establishment and expansion of branches and production facilities, as well as restructuring and turnaround measures to bring automotive suppliers and mechanical engineering companies in critical phases back into the profit zone. Under the direction of CEO Karlheinz Zuerl, a team of consultants, experts and interim managers is on hand to work on-site with the client if necessary. The CEO himself is available for tasks as an interim general manager and for executive consulting. GTEC’s list of references includes corporations such as BMW, Bosch, General Motors and Siemens, large medium-sized companies such as Hella, Schaeffler, Valeo and ZF, as well as smaller medium-sized companies that are less well known but are operating all the more.

    MIL OSI – Submitted News

  • MIL-OSI United Nations: DR Congo crisis: ‘The violence must end now’, UN Security Council told

    Source: United Nations 4

    Peace and Security

    The UN Security Council convened its second emergency meeting in three days on Tuesday to address the escalating crisis in Goma – the regional capital of the eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC).

    Vivian van de Perre, Deputy Head of the UN Stabilization Mission in the DRC (MONUSCO), provided a detailed briefing from Goma, highlighting the dire humanitarian situation and the need for “urgent and coordinated international action,” to stop the fighting between Rwanda-backed M23 rebels and Congolese forces – as they battle for control of the city.

    She reported that the recent clashes have led to massive displacement, with over 178,000 people fleeing Kalehe territory after the M23 took control of Minova.

    More than 34,000 of those on the run have sought refuge in already overcrowded IDP sites in and around Goma, exacerbating the humanitarian crisis and overwhelming the city’s infrastructure.

    Rebels and Rwandan troops joint attack

    “Despite the appeals from Member States during the Security Council meeting on 26 January, the M23/RDF [Rwanda Defence Force] launched an attack on Goma, using heavy direct and indirect fire,” Ms. van de Perre stated.

    These attacks have resulted in numerous civilian casualties, further displacement, and significant trauma among the population.”

    She emphasised the critical role of MONUSCO in providing refuge and protection, noting that the mission has received a large number of people seeking safety, including officials and armed elements who have surrendered.

    MONUSCO’s bases are not able to accommodate the large number of surrendering elements and civilians seeking refuge,” she said. “The Uruguayan Battalion (URUBATT) alone has taken in approximately 1,200 Congolese soldiers and over a thousand civilians, placing immense pressure on resources.”

    UN bases ‘not safe’

    The situation is further complicated by damage to water tanks, compromising the security of UN personnel and property.

    “Our bases are not safe: two mortars have hit MONUSCO bases and compounds in the last three days, as well as numerous bullets,” Ms. van de Perre reported.

    Installations of [formed police unit] staff in Jambar camp have been destroyed and burnt.

    Casualty evacuation efforts remain a significant challenge, with peacekeepers injured during the fighting in Sake.

    Despite the closure of Goma airport, MONUSCO continues to facilitate medical evacuations with the help of SAMIDRC – the Southern African Development Community mission in DRC.

    Evacuation of injured ‘blue helmets’

    “We continue to do our utmost to ensure timely evacuation of injured peacekeepers and other casualties to our level 3 hospital in Goma despite continued challenges,” Ms. van de Perre said.

    The M23 and Rwandan forces’ capture of Goma’s international airport and their advance from multiple directions have heightened the risk of weapons proliferation, as combatants blend into the civilian population, the Deputy UN Special Representative continued.

    The mass influx of IDPs, separation of families, and escape of prisoners from Goma prison have increased the vulnerability of women and children to sexual and gender-based violence.

    Ms. van de Perre called on all parties to guarantee the protection of life and access to basic services, and to prevent sexual violence.

    “The degree of suffering that the population here in Goma and its environs is enduring is truly unimaginable,” she said.

    Let us please draw on our humanity and do our utmost to bring an immediate end to such levels of violence and suffering.”

    In light of the ongoing conflict, Ms. van de Perre urged the establishment of humanitarian corridors between Goma, Minova and Bukavu, and the reopening of critical airports and border points.

    Political solution must be found

    She emphasised that military action cannot resolve the conflict and called for a resumption of the Luanda Process under the auspices of the Angolan Government to ensure de-escalation and “avert the looming threat of a third Congo war.”

    The briefing concluded with a call for urgent and coordinated international action to address the crisis in Goma. Despite the challenges, MONUSCO remains a vital lifeline for vulnerable groups, but its effectiveness is being severely tested by the ongoing violence and logistical difficulties.

    “The protection of civilians and the pursuit of a peaceful resolution must be prioritised to end the suffering in Goma,” MONUSCO’s deputy head stressed.

    MIL OSI United Nations News

  • MIL-OSI USA: ICYMI—Hagerty Joins America’s Newsroom on Fox News to Discuss Trump’s Foreign Policy Wins, Cabinet Nominations

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Tennessee Bill Hagerty
    WASHINGTON—United States Senator Bill Hagerty (R-TN), a member of the Senate Appropriations, Banking, and Foreign Relations Committees and former U.S. Ambassador to Japan, today joined America’s Newsroom on Fox News to discuss President Donald Trump’s foreign policy wins during his first week in office, along with the need to confirm his cabinet nominees.

    *Click the photo above or here to watch*
    Partial Transcript
    Hagerty on the need for reciprocity in tariff deals: “If you think about the tariff situation worldwide, the United States has been treated unfairly for years. President Trump has constantly and consistently talked about reciprocity. This goes all the way back to World War II. We created very favorable terms of trade for nations in Europe, nations like Japan, whose economies have been devastated. We should have time limited [the trade deals]. We should have put some sort of GDP-per-capita limit on that. Because right now, the United States has the lowest tariffs, on a trade weighted basis, of any major economy. Other countries have been taking advantage of us. President Trump sees this, and access to our economy is a privilege, not a right. You saw what happened in Colombia; he knows how to use leverage. He knows how to, essentially, let them know that he’s not going to tolerate bad behavior. And if countries like Colombia don’t want to cooperate with us, they’re not going to have access to our markets.”
    Hagerty on pausing funding to other nations within the State Department: “These are all very legitimate and reasonable questions to ask, Martha. There’s a lot of pearl clutching going on in Washington right now. But I can tell you back in 2016, 2017, the State Department acted as quickly as they could to shovel money out the door to NGOs, to the UN, to agencies that didn’t have the U.S.’ best interest at heart. I think it’s entirely appropriate that Secretary [Marco] Rubio put a pause on all of this. I sent a letter to every agency head in the United States government, letting them know, line and verse, how they would violate U.S. law if they were to ‘reprogram funds’ at the very end. We’re going to get a report on all of that here in the next couple of weeks. So, I think this is something that’s entirely legitimate. It’s something that should happen, and we need to make certain that taxpayer [dollars] are being used for things that advance America’s interest.”
    Hagerty on the state of Trump’s cabinet nominees: “I actually feel very good about how the nominees are moving through the process. You think about Senator [John] Thune, he’s been extremely diligent, in terms of setting up a process that will get our nominees confirmed as rapidly as possible. The Democrats have done everything they can to slow us down, but Senator Thune, our leader, has done a terrific job of making sure that we’re moving a pace. I feel good about our nominees. [Secretary] Pete Hegseth certainly had everything, including the kitchen sink, thrown at him, and he navigated the process very well. And I think as people got to know him, got to hear from him, they got to realize they had a very smart individual there who is very capable. I expect the same from the other nominees, and that process continues to pace here this week.”
    Hagerty on the need to confirm Trump’s cabinet nominees: “President Trump is entitled to his nominees. I think you’ve got a tremendous number of challenges that our nation is facing right now. President Trump opened a very large tent as he came into office, and he selected people that he thinks will help him achieve his goals, achieve the promises that he made to the American public. So, I think, on the balance, Republicans should, certainly, defer to President Trump. Everybody’s entitled to their own opinion—obviously, you’ve seen people vote in different ways from me—but, on the whole, I think people should give President Trump the benefit of the doubt.”

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Security: Guatemalan National Pleads Guilty to Unlawful Reentry

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    BOSTON – A Guatemalan man pleaded guilty yesterday in federal court in Boston to illegally reentering the United States after deportation.

    Edilzar Morales-Barillas, 36, pleaded guilty to one count of unlawful reentry of a deported alien. U.S. District Court Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton scheduled sentencing for May 7, 2025. Morales-Barillas was charged on July 31, 2024.

    Morales-Barillas was deported from the United States on May 14, 2021. Sometime after his May 2021 removal, Morales-Barillas unlawfully reentered the United States. Immigration and Customs Enforcement became aware of Morales-Barillas’ unlawful presence in the United States on May 27, 2023, following his arrest for a fourth offense of operating under the influence of alcohol.  

    The charge of unlawful reentry of a deported alien provides for a sentence of up to 20 years in prison, three years of supervised release and a fine of up to $250,000. The defendant will be subject to deportation proceedings upon completion any sentence imposed. Sentences are imposed by a federal district court judge based upon the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and statutes which govern the determination of a sentence in a criminal case.  

    United States Attorney Leah B. Foley and Todd M. Lyons, Field Office Director, Boston, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s Enforcement and Removal Operations made the announcement today. Assistant U.S. Attorney Brian Sullivan of the Criminal Division is prosecuting the case.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI: Credicorp Ltd.: Credicorp’s Earnings Release and Conference Call 4Q24

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Lima, Jan. 28, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Lima, PERU, January, Tuesday 28th, 2025 – Credicorp Ltd. announces to its shareholders and the market that its 4Q24 Earnings Release Report will be released on Monday, February 10th, 2025, after market close.

    Credicorp’s Webcast / Conference Call to discuss such results; will be held on Tuesday, February 11th, 2025, at 9:30 a.m. ET (9:30 a.m. Lima, Peru time).

    The call will be hosted by:
    Gianfranco Ferrari – Chief Executive Officer, – Alejandro Perez Reyes – Chief Financial Officer, Francesca Raffo – Chief Innovation Officer, Cesar Rios – Chief Risk Officer, Diego Cavero – Head of Universal Banking, Cesar Rivera – Head of Insurance and Pensions, Carlos Sotelo – Mibanco CFO and Investor Relations Team.

    We encourage participants to pre-register for the listen-only webcast presentation using the following link:
    https://dpregister.com/DiamondPassRegistration/register?confirmationNumber=10196121&linkSecurityString=fe53fdcc1c

    Callers who pre-register will be given a conference passcode and unique PIN to gain immediate access to the call and bypass the live operator. Participants may pre-register at any time, including up to and after the call start time.

    Those unable to pre-register may dial in by calling:
    Participant dial-in (toll-free): 1 844 435 0321
    Participant international dial-in: 1 412 317 5615
    Participant Web Phone: Click Here
    Conference ID: Credicorp Conference Call

    The webcast will be archived for one year on our investor relations website at:
    https://credicorp.gcs-web.com/events-and-presentations/upcoming-events

    Credicorp reminds you that we filed our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31st, 2023 (2023 Form 20-F) with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 24th, 2024. The 2023 Form 20-F includes audited consolidated financial statements of Credicorp and its subsidiaries as of December 31st, 2021,2022 and 2023 under IFRS. Our 2023 Form 20-F can be downloaded from Credicorp’s website: https://credicorp.gcs-web.com/annual-materials. Holders of Credicorp’s securities and any other interested parties may request a hard copy of our 2023 Form 20-F, free of charge, by filling out the form located on the link “mail request” on Credicorp’s website.

    About Credicorp

    Credicorp Ltd. (NYSE: BAP) is the leading financial services holding company in Peru, with a diversified business portfolio organized into four primary lines of business: Universal Banking, through Banco de Crédito del Perú (BCP) and Banco de Crédito de Bolivia; Microfinance, through Mibanco in Peru and Colombia; Insurance and Pension Funds, through Grupo Pacifico and Prima AFP; and Investment Management and Advisory, through Credicorp Capital and ASB Bank Corp. Credicorp has a presence in Peru, Chile, Colombia, Bolivia, and Panama.

    For further information, please contact the IR team:

    investorrelations@credicorpperu.com

    Investor Relations
    Credicorp Ltd.

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI USA: Barrasso Votes to Confirm Sean Duffy as Secretary of Transportation

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Wyoming John Barrasso
    WASHINGTON D.C. – U.S. Senator John Barrasso (R-Wyo.), Senate Majority Whip, today issued the following statement after the Senate voted to confirm Sean Duffy as head of the Department of Transportation.
    Earlier today, Senator Barrasso spoke on the Senate floor in full support of former Congressman Sean Duffy’s nomination to be Secretary of Transportation.
    Click HERE to watch Senator Barrasso’s full remarks.
    Sen Barrasso’s remarks as prepared:
    “Since January 20, the United States Senate has confirmed 5 of President Trump’s well-qualified nominees. Today, the Senate will confirm the sixth.
    “Former Congressman Sean Duffy is the nominee to be the Secretary of Transportation. Congressman Duffy received unanimous support in the Commerce Committee.
    “As Secretary of Transportation, Congressman Duffy will be responsible for ensuring Americans have reliable infrastructure and safe travel. His job is critical to America’s economic success.
    “From the Erie Canal to the Transcontinental Railroad in the 19th Century, from the Panama Canal to the Interstate Highway System in the 20th Century – infrastructure transformed our commercial republic into an economic superpower.
    “Today, our highways, bridges, ports, and airways need improvement as travel and commerce hit new records. We need to build great things in America again. Families and businesses need confidence that they’ll get where they need to go.
    “Sean Duffy is dedicated to moving America forward. As Secretary of Transportation, he will lead the Department with safety and modernization at the forefront.
    “I look forward to confirming Congressman Duffy and working with him.”

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Cornyn to Fight to Reimburse Texas for Border Security Costs

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Texas John Cornyn
    WASHINGTON – Today on the floor, U.S. Senator John Cornyn (R-TX) discussed the need for Congress to act on Gov. Abbott’s request to reimburse the State of Texas for its efforts to secure the Texas-Mexico border, which is a federal responsibility, and address the unprecedented crisis created by the Biden administration. Excerpts of Sen. Cornyn’s remarks are below, and video can be found here.
    “In the midst of the Biden administration’s abject failure to keep the American people safe and control the movement of people and drugs, including some of the most dangerous criminals you can imagine, it was up to the State of Texas and our leadership, like Governor Abbott, to step up and defend our people and our borders to the best we could.”
    “The Biden-Harris administration’s abject dereliction of its responsibility at an international border to enforce the law cost the State of Texas about $11.1 billion.”
    “Keeping our nation’s border secure is the responsibility of the federal government. It is not—and it should not—be the responsibility of the individual states.”
    “Governor Abbott has asked Congress to reimburse Texas for its costs that should have been incurred by the federal government.”
    “I support this request, and along with our state delegation, we are going to fight to get Texas taxpayers the money they’re rightfully owed.”
    “Texas taxpayers should not have to foot the bill alone as a result of President Biden’s mishandling of border policy.”
    “The federal government created this crisis, and it’s up to the federal government to pay the tab.” 

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: January 28th, 2025 Heinrich: Trump’s Blockade on Federal Funding Pummels New Mexicans and American Economy

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for New Mexico Martin Heinrich
    Published: January 28th, 2025

    WASHINGTON – U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), a member of the Senate Appropriations Committee, is condemning President Trump’s unlawful direction to unilaterally blockade all federal grant funding.
    “Our economy, our healthcare system, our schools, our law enforcement and fire departments, our newborns, our elders, our veterans – everyone, everywhere in New Mexico. President Trump is attempting to shove all of this over a cliff,” said Heinrich. “In New Mexico alone, Trump’s blockade on federal funding will make it impossible for thousands to pay rent on February 1st, force tens of thousands of New Mexico students to drop out of college without Pell Grant funding, close hundreds of preschool programs across the state, deprive 7 out of 10 New Mexico children their daily lunch, and cut off federal Medicaid reimbursement – impacting 7 out of 10 nursing home residents, 55% of newborn births, and all health care providers in our state.”
    Heinrich continued, “Trump is clearly willing to pummel New Mexicans and the American economy for his twisted and deranged agenda and fragile ego. But the Constitution is clear: the president cannot override, delay, or rescind Congress’s funding laws. We passed these laws to help working families get ahead and put food on the table and create jobs New Mexicans can build their families around. I will fight like hell to undo this brazen, barbaric blockade from this wannabe dictator and his weird billionaire lackeys.”
    The Constitution explicitly gives Congress, not the president, the power of the purse. The president does not have the power to override spending laws that Congress has passed and the president has signed into law. Article I, Section 9, Clause 7 of the Constitution says: “No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law.” Fact sheets from the Senate and House Appropriations Committees detailing how presidents lack power to unilaterally override congressional spending laws and deny enacted funding to communities can be found here and here.
    Examples of the impacts of this funding blockade:
    PUBLIC SAFETY: Grants for law enforcement and homeland security activities will cease to go out the door, undermining public safety in every state and territory.
    DISASTER RELIEF: Public assistance and hazard mitigation grants from the Disaster Relief Fund (DRF) to state, tribal, territorial, and local governments and non-profits to help communities quickly respond to, recover from, and prepare for major disasters will be halted—right as so many communities are struggling after severe natural disasters, including Roswell flooding and Ruidoso fires and severe storms and wildfires in Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, and California.
    INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS: All federally-funded transportation projects across the country—roads, bridges, public transit, and more—will be halted, including projects already under construction.
    COMBATTING THE FENTANYL CRISIS: Funding for communities to address the substance use disorder crisis and combat the fentanyl crisis will be cut off.
    988 SUICIDE AND CRISIS LIFELINE: Funding for the 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline, as well as grants for mental health services, will be cut off.
    MEDICAL RESEARCH: There will be immediate pauses on all funding for critical health research, including research on cancer, Alzheimer’s disease, and diabetes, as well as clinical trials at the NIH Clinical Center and all across the country—disrupting lifesaving and often time-sensitive research.
    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS: Critical preparedness and response capability funding used to prepare for disasters, public health emergencies, and chemical, biological, radiological, or nuclear events will be frozen.
    FIREFIGHTING: Grants to support firefighters across the country will be halted—this includes grants that help states and localities purchase essential firefighting equipment.
    HEAD START: Funding for Head Start programs that provide comprehensive early childhood education for more than 800,000 kids and their families will be cut off. Teachers and staff would not get paid and programs may not be able to stay open.
    CHILD CARE: Child care programs across the country will not be able to access the funding they rely on to keep their doors open.
    K-12 SCHOOLS: Federal funding for our K-12 schools will be halted. School districts may not be able to access key formula grant funding including Title I, IDEA, Impact Aid, and Career and Technical Education, which would pose tremendous financial burdens on schools in the middle of the school year.
    HIGHER EDUCATION AND JOB TRAINING: Millions of students relying on Pell grants, federal student loans, and federal work study will have their plans to pursue postsecondary education and further their careers thrown into chaos as federal financial aid disbursements are paused.
    HEALTH SERVICES: Federal funding for community health centers that provide health care for over 30 million Americans will be immediately frozen, creating chaos for patients trying get their prescriptions, a regular checkup, and more.
    SMALL BUSINESSES: The Small Business Administration will have to halt loans to small businesses—including those in disaster ravaged communities in North Carolina, Texas, and Florida.
    VETERANS CARE: Federal grants to help veterans in rural areas access health care and grants to help veterans get other critical services, including suicide prevention resources, transition assistance, and housing for homeless veterans, will be cut off.
    NUTRITION ASSISTANCE: Millions of American families and children who rely on nutrition assistance programs like SNAP, WIC, and school lunch programs will be left hungry as funding is cut off and non-profits who provide additional assistance lose federal funding.
    TRIBES: Funding to Tribes for basic government services like health care, public safety, law enforcement, Tribal schools, housing, and food assistance will be halted.
    PREVENTING VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN: All Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) grants, as well as funding for victims assistance and state and local police, will be cut off.
    U.S. COMPETITIVENESS: Existing grants to support research for AI and quantum computing will be halted and any new grant funding would be paused—undermining U.S. innovation and competitiveness with China and putting American jobs at risk.
    ENERGY JOBS: Grants for critical energy projects nationwide will be cut off—halting billions of dollars in investment nationwide and jeopardizing good-paying American jobs. The Department of Energy Loan Program Office will halt loans in 28 states, impacting hundreds of thousands construction and operations jobs.
    FOOD INSPECTIONS: Some states will have to take on the full financial burden of ensuring the nation’s meat supply is safe if federal cooperative agreements for meat inspection are halted.
    SUPPORT FOR SERVICE MEMBERS: Support for a host of Department of Defense financial assistance and grant programs supporting service members and their families will be halted, including the Fisher House, Impact Aid, community noise mitigation, ROTC language training, STEM programs, and the USO.
    WEAKENS MILITARY READINESS: Grants and other assistance appropriated to strengthen military effectiveness and defense capacity will be halted, including Defense Production Act support for the defense industrial base, basic research grants necessary to advance key technologies, and small business support to strengthen supply chains.
    AMERICANS OVERSEAS: Programs that track and combat the spread of infectious diseases, create business opportunities for American companies in emerging markets, combat terrorism, and counter the influence of China, Russia, and Iran—and efforts to ensure the safety and security of Americans implementing these programs—are all suspended and could be terminated.
    An extensive list of potentially impacted federal programs can be found here.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Get FEMA Disaster Assistance; Only Ten Days Left to Apply

    Source: US Federal Emergency Management Agency

    Headline: Get FEMA Disaster Assistance; Only Ten Days Left to Apply

    Get FEMA Disaster Assistance; Only Ten Days Left to Apply

    SANTA FE, New Mexico – Chaves County homeowners and renters who were affected by the Oct. 19-20 storms and flooding may be eligible to receive federal disaster assistance from FEMA. But don’t wait to register! Jan. 2, 2025, is the last day to apply.How to Apply for FEMA Disaster AssistanceThe first step for individuals and households to receive financial help is to apply to FEMA for federal assistance. There are no costs involved to apply for, or receive, FEMA assistance. FEMA grants do not have to be repaid. FEMA assistance is nontaxable and will not affect eligibility for Social Security, Medicaid or other federal benefits. There are four ways to apply:Visit the Roswell Disaster Recovery Center operated by the state of New Mexico and FEMA. For location and hours, visit fema.gov/drc or send a text message with the word “DRC” and a zip code to 43362.Holiday hours at the Roswell DRC are:Tuesdays, Dec. 24 and Dec. 31, 10 a.m. to 3 p.m.Wednesday, Dec. 25, Thursday, Dec 26 and Wednesday, Jan. 1, closed.Go online to disasterassistance.gov/Download the FEMA Appfor mobile devices at fema.gov/about/news-multimedia/mobile-productsCall the FEMA Helpline at 800-621-3362 between 5 a.m. and 9 p.m. Help is available in most languages.Holiday hours for the FEMA Helpline are:Tuesday, Dec. 24, closed.Wednesday, Dec. 25, closed.For an American Sign Language video on how to apply for assistance, visit youtube.com/watch= WZGpWI2RCNw.For the latest on New Mexico’s recovery, follow the FEMA Region 6 X account at X.com/FEMARegion6 or on Facebook at facebook.com/FEMARegion6.
    alexa.brown
    Tue, 01/28/2025 – 20:03

    MIL OSI USA News