NewzIntel.com

Category: United States of America

  • MIL-OSI USA News: Preventing Woke AI in the Federal Government

    Source: US Whitehouse

    By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered:

    Section 1.  Purpose.  Artificial intelligence (AI) will play a critical role in how Americans of all ages learn new skills, consume information, and navigate their daily lives.  Americans will require reliable outputs from AI, but when ideological biases or social agendas are built into AI models, they can distort the quality and accuracy of the output. 

    One of the most pervasive and destructive of these ideologies is so-called “diversity, equity, and inclusion” (DEI).  In the AI context, DEI includes the suppression or distortion of factual information about race or sex; manipulation of racial or sexual representation in model outputs; incorporation of concepts like critical race theory, transgenderism, unconscious bias, intersectionality, and systemic racism; and discrimination on the basis of race or sex.  DEI displaces the commitment to truth in favor of preferred outcomes and, as recent history illustrates, poses an existential threat to reliable AI.

    For example, one major AI model changed the race or sex of historical figures — including the Pope, the Founding Fathers, and Vikings — when prompted for images because it was trained to prioritize DEI requirements at the cost of accuracy.  Another AI model refused to produce images celebrating the achievements of white people, even while complying with the same request for people of other races.  In yet another case, an AI model asserted that a user should not “misgender” another person even if necessary to stop a nuclear apocalypse. 

    While the Federal Government should be hesitant to regulate the functionality of AI models in the private marketplace, in the context of Federal procurement, it has the obligation not to procure models that sacrifice truthfulness and accuracy to ideological agendas.  Building on Executive Order 13960 of December 3, 2020 (Promoting the Use of Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence in the Federal Government), this order helps fulfill that obligation in the context of large language models.

    Sec. 2.  Definitions.  For purposes of this order:

    (a)  The term “agency” means an executive department, a military department, or any independent establishment within the meaning of 5 U.S.C. 101, 102, and 104(1), respectively, and any wholly owned Government corporation within the meaning of 31 U.S.C. 9101.

    (b)  The term “agency head” means the highest-ranking

    official or officials of an agency, such as the Secretary, Administrator, Chairman, Director, Commissioners, or Board of Directors.

    (c)  The term “LLM” means a large language model, which is a generative AI model trained on vast, diverse datasets that enable the model to generate natural-language responses to user prompts.

    (d)  The term “national security system” has the same meaning as in 44 U.S.C. 3552(b)(6).

    Sec. 3.  Unbiased AI Principles.  It is the policy of the United States to promote the innovation and use of trustworthy AI.  To advance that policy, agency heads shall, consistent with applicable law and in consideration of guidance issued pursuant to section 4 of this order, procure only those LLMs developed in accordance with the following two principles (Unbiased AI Principles): 

    (a)  Truth-seeking.  LLMs shall be truthful in responding to user prompts seeking factual information or analysis.  LLMs shall prioritize historical accuracy, scientific inquiry, and objectivity, and shall acknowledge uncertainty where reliable information is incomplete or contradictory. 

    (b)  Ideological Neutrality.  LLMs shall be neutral, nonpartisan tools that do not manipulate responses in favor of ideological dogmas such as DEI.  Developers shall not intentionally encode partisan or ideological judgments into an LLM’s outputs unless those judgments are prompted by or otherwise readily accessible to the end user. 

    Sec. 4.  Implementation.  (a)  Within 120 days of the date of this order, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), in consultation with the Administrator for Federal Procurement Policy, the Administrator of General Services, and the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy, shall issue guidance to agencies to implement section 3 of this order.  That guidance shall:

    (i)    account for technical limitations in complying with this order;

    (ii)   permit vendors to comply with the requirement in the second Unbiased AI Principle to be transparent about ideological judgments through disclosure of the LLM’s system prompt, specifications, evaluations, or other relevant documentation, and avoid requiring disclosure of specific model weights or other sensitive technical data where practicable;

    (iii)  avoid over-prescription and afford latitude for vendors to comply with the Unbiased AI Principles and take different approaches to innovation;

    (iv)   specify factors for agency heads to consider in determining whether to apply the Unbiased AI Principles to LLMs developed by the agencies and to AI models other than LLMs; and

    (v)    make exceptions as appropriate for the use of LLMs in national security systems.

    (b)  Each agency head shall, to the maximum extent consistent with applicable law:

    (i)    include in each Federal contract for an LLM entered into following the date of the OMB guidance issued under subsection (a) of this section terms requiring that the procured LLM comply with the Unbiased AI Principles and providing that decommissioning costs shall be charged to the vendor in the event of termination by the agency for the vendor’s noncompliance with the contract following a reasonable period to cure;

    (ii)   to the extent practicable and consistent with contract terms, revise existing contracts for LLMs to include the terms specified in subsection (b)(i) of this section; and

    (iii)  within 90 days of the OMB guidance issued under subsection (a) of this section, adopt procedures to ensure that LLMs procured by the agency comply with the Unbiased AI Principles.

    Sec. 5.  General Provisions.  (a)  Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:

    (i)   the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or

    (ii)  the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

    (b)  This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

    (c)  This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

    (d)  The costs for publication of this order shall be borne by the General Services Administration.

                                  DONALD J. TRUMP

    THE WHITE HOUSE,

        July 23, 2025.

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI Security: Illegal Alien Sent to Prison for Role in Nationwide Scheme to Sell Fake Texas Paper Vehicle Tags

    Source: US FBI

    HOUSTON – The final man in a large-scale conspiracy to commit wire fraud in relation to the sale of hundreds of thousands of fraudulent Texas paper license plates has been ordered to prison, announced U.S. Attorney Nicholas J. Ganjei.

    Emmanuel Padilla Reyes, 35, pleaded guilty May 13.

    U.S. District Judge George C. Hanks has now ordered Reyes to serve 60 months in federal prison and to pay $22 million in restitution to the Texas Department of Motor Vehicles. Not a U.S. citizen, he is expected to face removal proceedings following his imprisonment. At the hearing, the court heard testimony from the family of a victim killed by a truck bearing a fraudulent paper license plate that one of Reyes’ dealerships had issued. In handing down the sentence, the court noted that there were many more victims just like this one whose lives Reyes harmed and changed, and that this was not a victimless crime.

    “The defendant’s criminal scheme was not only illegal in itself, but also facilitated scores of other crimes, such as armed robberies and drive-by shootings,” said Ganjei. “Texas motorists deserve to know vehicles on the roadways alongside them and their families are genuinely licensed, rather than the instruments of crime.”

    “This case led not only to arrests and prison sentences for those behind a national multimillion-dollar scheme, but it also led to changes in the way temporary tags are issued in Texas. Changes that just went into effect July 1,” said Special Agent in Charge Douglas Williams of the FBI Houston Field Office. “That’s impactful, and I’m so proud of our law enforcement partners and the FBI Houston case team who made it all happen.”

    Reyes and co-conspirators sold over 550,000 tags using the internet and messaging apps, without selling any vehicles. He used aliases, including a stolen identity, to obtain car dealer licenses for the scheme. The fake tags allowed buyers to evade registration, insurance and law enforcement detection, enabling crimes such as robberies and drive-by shootings.

    In Texas, used car dealers must obtain an independent General Distinguishing Number to access the state’s eTag portal and issue temporary buyer tags. At the time of the indictment, the system lacked data entry restrictions. Reyes used fake identities and documents to obtain licenses for two fictitious dealerships, “King’s Ranch Autoland” and “Texas Motor Company,” then advertised Texas buyer tags for sale on Facebook and Instagram.

    Reyes will remain in custody pending transfer to a Federal Bureau of Prisons facility to be determined in the near future.

    Co-defendants Leidy Areli Hernandez Lopez, 45, Octavian Ocasio, 53, and Daniel Christine-Tani, 36, were also charged and convicted in the scheme and were sentenced to prison. Lopez, also in the United States illegally, failed to report to prison. A federal grand jury returned an indictment Feb. 20 charging her with failure to surrender. Lopez is considered a fugitive, and a warrant remains outstanding for her arrest. Anyone with information about her whereabouts is asked to contact the FBI at 713-693-5000.

    The FBI conducted the investigation with assistance from Travis County Constable Office – Precinct 3, Houston Police Department, Texas Department of Public Safety, Harris County Sheriff’s Office, New York State Police and New York Police Department. Assistant U.S. Attorneys Belinda Beek and Adam Goldman are prosecuting the case.

    MIL Security OSI –

  • MIL-OSI: Subsea 7 S.A. Notice of Extraordinary General Meeting

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION IN OR INTO THE UNITED STATES, OR IN ANY OTHER JURISDICTION IN WHICH SUCH DISTRIBUTION WOULD BE PROHIBITED BY APPLICABLE LAW

    Luxembourg – 24 July 2025 – Subsea 7 S.A. (Oslo Børs: SUBC, ADR: SUBCY) (the Company) today published and distributed to eligible holders of common shares the notice of meeting for an extraordinary general meeting of shareholders (the EGM). The purpose of the EGM is to consider the proposed combination between Subsea7 and Saipem SpA.

    The EGM is scheduled to take place at 15:00 (local time) on 25 September 2025 at 5, place Winston Churchill, L-1340 Luxembourg.

    The holders of common shares on record at the close of business on 11 September 2025 will be entitled to vote. The deadline for submission of votes for holders of common shares is 19 September 2025.

    The notice of meeting and supporting materials, including the common merger plan, the report of the board of directors with respect to the common merger plan, and the reports of the respective independent experts of the Company and Saipem SpA, will shortly be available on the Company’s website, subsea7.com.

    The EGM agenda includes the proposal to distribute a dividend of €450m, equating to approximately NOK 18.00 per share as at today’s date.  This distribution is in accordance with the terms of the merger with Saipem S.p.A., conditional on completion of the merger and expected to be paid immediately before the proposed merger effective date.

    In addition, the EGM agenda includes a proposal to distribute a special dividend of €105m, equating to approximately NOK 4.15 per share, as at today’s date.  This distribution is related to a permitted business divestment in accordance with the merger agreement with Saipem SpA.  The distribution is expected to be paid after closing of the relevant transaction or (if earlier) immediately before the proposed merger effective date.

    The key dates relating to both proposed dividends shall be published as soon as these dates are fixed.

    *******************************************************************************
    Subsea7 is a global leader in the delivery of offshore projects and services for the evolving energy industry, creating sustainable value by being the industry’s partner and employer of choice in delivering the efficient offshore solutions the world needs.

    Subsea7 is listed on the Oslo Børs (SUBC), ISIN LU0075646355, LEI 222100AIF0CBCY80AH62.

    *******************************************************************************

    Contact for investment community enquiries:
    Katherine Tonks
    Investor Relations Director
    Tel +44 20 8210 5568
    ir@subsea7.com

    No Offer or Solicitation

    This document is not an offer of merger consideration shares in the United States. Neither the merger consideration shares nor any other securities have been or will be registered under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and neither the merger considerations shares nor any other securities may be offered, sold or delivered within or into the United States, except pursuant to a registration statement filed pursuant to the Securities Act or an applicable exemption from registration or in a transaction otherwise not subject to the Securities Act. This document must not be forwarded, distributed or sent, directly or indirectly, in whole or in part, in or into the United States. This document does not constitute an offer of or an invitation by or on behalf of, Saipem or Subsea7, or any other person, to purchase any securities.

    This information is subject to the disclosure requirements pursuant to Section 5-12 the Norwegian Securities Trading Act.
    This stock exchange release was published by Katherine Tonks, Investor Relations, Subsea7, on 24 July 2025 at 00:40

    Attachments

    The MIL Network –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Duckworth, Pressley Lead Colleagues in Renewing Push to Protect Access to Reproductive Care for Low-Income Americans, Servicemembers and Millions More

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Illinois Tammy Duckworth

    July 23, 2025

    [WASHINGTON, D.C.] – U.S. Senator Tammy Duckworth (D–IL) and U.S. Representative Ayanna Pressley (D-MA-07) led their fellow Senate and House Democratic colleagues in reintroducing legislation to protect Americans’ right to access reproductive health care, regardless of income, insurance or zip code. The Equal Access to Abortion Coverage in Healthcare (EACH) Act would end the discriminatory Hyde Amendment and help lift unjust abortion coverage restrictions for those who depend on Medicaid and other government-sponsored plans—reaffirming the right to access reproductive health care after Donald Trump signed his Big, Beautiful Betrayal into law that will rip health care away from over 15 million Americans.

    “Ever since Trump’s far-right Supreme Court majority struck down Roe, Republicans have made it their mission to strip away a woman’s right to reproductive health care—a right they have no place to stand in the way of,” said Senator Duckworth. “As Republicans’ Big, Beautiful Betrayal kicks millions off their health care, we must act to help strengthen access to abortion coverage for low-income Americans, servicemembers and millions more—no matter their zip code. I’m proud to reintroduce this legislation alongside my colleagues so we can do just that.”

    “Abortion care is health care, and health care is a human right. With Trump and Republicans advancing a cruel, coordinated assault on our bodily autonomy—gutting Medicaid, defunding Planned Parenthood, and decimating access to care—we must use every tool available to protect and expand reproductive healthcare,” said Congresswoman Pressley. “The EACH Act would help us do just that. By repealing the racist and discriminatory Hyde Amendment, which has denied necessary care for vulnerable communities for nearly half a century, our bill would help ensure everyone in America can get the reproductive healthcare they need, regardless of income, insurance, or zip code. I’m grateful to Senator Duckworth and our colleagues for their partnership on this critical priority.”

    Along with Duckworth, the legislation is cosponsored in the Senate by U.S. Senators Patty Murray (D-WA), Mazie K. Hirono (D-HI), Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), Alex Padilla (D-CA), Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), Jacky Rosen (D-NV), Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH), Adam Schiff (D-CA), Martin Heinrich (D-NM), Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY), Chris Coons (D-DE), Maria Cantwell (D-WA), Chris Van Hollen (D-MD), Lisa Blunt Rochester (D-DE), Bernie Sanders (D-VT), Ruben Gallego (D-AZ), Cory Booker (D-NJ), Tina Smith (D-MN), Tammy Baldwin (D-WI), Ron Wyden (D-OR), Peter Welch (D-VT), Ed Markey (D-MA), Chris Murphy (D-CT), Andy Kim (D-NJ), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), John Fetterman (D-PA), Catherine Cortez Masto (D-NV), Mark Kelly (D-AZ) and Ben Ray Lujan (D-NM).

    Along with Pressley, the legislation is cosponsored in the House by more than 150 U.S. Representatives.

    Copy of the bill text is available on Senator Duckworth’s website.

    Throughout her time in the Senate, Duckworth has made protecting reproductive freedom a top priority in the face of Republicans’ anti-choice crusade. Two weeks ago, Duckworth successfully included her provision to expand access to in-vitro fertilization (IVF) for military families in the Fiscal Year (FY) 2026 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) that passed through the U.S. Senate Armed Services Committee.

    Duckworth has also long pushed to pass her Right to IVF Act—which Senate Republicans blocked not once, but twice last year. This legislation would both establish a right to IVF and other assisted reproductive technology (ART), expand access for hopeful parents, Veterans and federal employees, as well as lower the costs of IVF for middle-class families across the country. Last September’s vote marked the fourth time Senate Republicans blocked Duckworth-led legislation that would protect access to IVF nationwide.

    Duckworth was the first Senator to give birth while serving in office and had both of her children with the help of IVF. In 2018, she advocated for the Senate to change its rules so she could bring her infant onto the Senate floor.

    -30-

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Bacon and Nadler Reintroduce Legislation to Protect Organ Donors

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Don Bacon (2nd District of Nebraska)

    Bacon and Nadler Reintroduce Legislation to Protect Organ Donors

    Washington – Today, Representatives Don Bacon (NE-02) and Jerrold Nadler (NY-12) reintroduced the Living Donor Protection Act bill package to protect the rights of living organ donors. The Living Donor Protection Act is introduced as a two-bill package in the House, H.R. 4583, the Living Donor Protection Act and H.R.4582, the Living Donor FMLA Protection Act. The bills, taken together, are identical to last session’s Living Donor Protection Act and S.1552 introduced in the Senate this session.

    “Our state is fortunate to have Nebraska Medicine, which has a robust living donor kidney exchange program, performing more kidney chains which involves anonymous donors donating to someone without a compatible living donor, than almost any hospital nationwide. However, some living donors are discriminated against when it comes to rates and provision of life insurance and disability insurance,” said Representative Bacon. “This legislation will help open the doors to more living donors so we can save more lives.”

    “Every year, thousands of Americans die while waiting on an organ transplant, yet potential organ donors still face barriers that punish them for trying to selflessly save a life. Insurance discrimination and the threat of job loss can make it economically impossible for potential donors to move forward with donation and these roadblocks are costing lives,” said Representative Nadler. “Congress must do everything in its power to remove deterrents to organ donation, which is why Congress must pass the Living Donor Protection Act bill package.”

    Organ donation saves thousands of lives every year, but burdensome roadblocks often stop individuals from becoming living donors. The Living Donor Protection Act bill package would protect living organ donors and promote organ donation in three easy, low-cost ways: 

    1. Prohibits life, disability, and long-term care insurance companies from denying or limiting coverage and from charging higher premiums based only on donor status;
    2. Amends the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 to specifically allow private and civil service employees to use FMLA leave to recover from donation surgery; and
    3. Directs HHS to update their materials on live organ donation to reflect these new protections and encourage more individuals to consider donating an organ.

    Currently, there are over 103,000 people on the national transplant waiting list, with almost 90,000 people on the kidney transplant list. The average wait time for a kidney transplant is about three to five years, and during that time, many patients become too sick to receive a transplant or die—13 people die each year waiting for an organ transplant. Receiving an organ from a living donor can shorten this wait time and ultimately allow the best chance for long-term success. Unfortunately, studies have found that up to one in four living donors report discrimination in the rates and provision of life insurance and disability insurance, and they can struggle to receive time off from work to complete their donation and recovery. Reducing barriers to living organ donation and educating potential donors on the protections provided to them under law will help to promote living organ donation and save the lives of those waiting for a transplant.

    The Living Donor Protection Act is endorsed by Alport Syndrome Foundation, American Association of Kidney Patients, American Council of Life Insurers, American Heart Association, American Kidney Fund, American Liver Foundation, American Nephrology Nurses Association, American Society of Nephrology, American Society of Pediatric Nephrology, American Society of Transplant Surgeons, American Society of Transplantation, Dialysis Patient Citizens, Global Liver Institute, IGA Nephropathy Foundation, International Society of Glomerular Disease, Kidney Transplant Collaborative, National Kidney Foundation, NephCure, the Nonprofit Kidney Care Alliance (NKCA), North American Transplant Coordinators Organization, Northwest Kidney Centers, the PKD Foundation, the Rogosin Institute, Sanofi, the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS), Transplant Recipients International Organization (TRIO), and Renal Physicians Association.

    “On behalf of all kidney patients, organ donors and American taxpayers, the American Association of Kidney Patients salutes U.S. Senators Tom Cotton and Kristen Gillibrand and U.S. Representatives Don Bacon and Jerrold Nadler for introducing the bipartisan Living Donor Protection Act so that living organ donors will no longer face the Hobbesian choice of saving an innocent human life at the risk of losing insurance coverages that provide economic security and peace of mind to their families and loved ones. The time is now for America to transcend high-cost, high-mortality dialysis care as the default solution for people living with kidney failure and to encourage greater living organ donation and greater transplant opportunities for all Americans in need of a life-saving organ,” said Edward V. Hickey, III, President, American Association of Kidney Patients.

    “Life insurers are committed to helping people access the financial protection they want and need for themselves and their families. The Living Donor Protection Act will help ensure that organ donors can continue to access life, disability income, or long-term care coverage, while upholding fair underwriting standards. Most importantly, it will safeguard those who selflessly give the gift of life through organ donation,” said David Chavern, President and CEO, American Council of Life Insurers.

    “The selfless individuals who give the gift of life by donating a kidney should not face discrimination by life, long-term care, or disability insurers. This legislation would be a significant step in efforts to encourage more living donors and reduce the kidney transplant waiting list by providing the protections that living donors should receive for their lifesaving actions,” said LaVarne Burton, President and CEO, American Kidney Fund. 

    “No child or adult should die waiting for a liver transplant. We must work together to increase living organ donation, and the Living Donor Protection Act provides a tangible path forward by removing key barriers for those willing to give the gift of life. We are so grateful to Representatives Bacon and Nadler for their extraordinary leadership and commitment to advancing living donor transplantation, which will help thousands of liver patients throughout the country,” said Lorraine Stiehl, CEO, American Liver Foundation and caregiver to a transplant patient. 

    “ASN commends the re-introduction of the Living Donor Protection Act and accompanying Living Donor FMLA Protection Act, critical legislation which will remove barriers that discourage living donors from providing the life-saving gift of a kidney transplant. Americans who are considering becoming living donors deserve more support than the current system provides for them, and ASN believes the Living Donor Protection Act and accompanying Living Donor FMLA Protection Act are critical to achieve this goal,” said Prabir Roy-Chaudhury, MD, PhD, FASN, President, American Society of Nephrology President.

    “On behalf of the American Society of Transplantation (AST), representing a majority of the nation’s transplant medical professionals, our Society strongly applauds and endorses the re-introduction of the Living Donor Protection Act (LDPA). AST is grateful for the ongoing and steadfast leadership of Representatives Bacon, Nadler and Senators Cotton and Gillibrand to protect transplant patients and strengthen living donation. The LDPA is a patient-focused bill seeking to remove policy barriers that might otherwise prevent an individual from providing a lifesaving donor organ. AST greatly appreciates this bipartisan, bicameral, and patient centric legislation. We look forward to working with you to advance the LDPA in this 119th Congress,” said Dr. Jon Kobashigawa, MD, President, American Society of Transplantation. 

    “On behalf of more than 2,000 transplant surgeons and professionals, the American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS) enthusiastically commends the champions of the Living Donor Protection Act (LDPA) for their unwavering commitment to saving lives. As a tireless advocate for this legislation since its inception—and a proud partner in shaping its recent progress—ASTS is thrilled to see the momentum continue following the bill’s strong bipartisan support in the 118th Congress. With a preliminary CBO score of zero, there is no better time for Congress to act. Passing the LDPA will provide vital, commonsense protections for living donors and remove unnecessary employment and insurance barriers to giving the ultimate gift: the gift of life,” said Ginny L. Bumgardner, MD, PhD, American Society of Transplant Surgeons.  

    “Global Liver Institute strongly supports the Living Donor Protection Act as an essential step to save lives by making the donation process affordable for living donors and protecting their employment. This bipartisan legislation was a collaborative effort, reflecting the policies determined most important to support living donors as determined by organ donors, liver and kidney patients, the insurance industry, transplant professionals, nephrologists, advocacy organizations and disease professionals. We look forward to its final passage in the 119th Congress,” said Larry Holden, President and CEO, Global Liver Institute.  

    “Living donors are heroes demonstrating compassion and generosity, and they are also rigorously screened individuals at the peak of health. Our family, friends and neighbors who choose to give the gift of a kidney enable thousands of Americans per year to resume a life where they can fully contribute to society, the economy, and their families rather than being limited by the life-support stopgap of dialysis. The ISGD enthusiastically endorses the Living Donor Protection Act,” said Laurel Damashek, Executive Director, International Society of Glomerular Disease and living donor kidney transplant recipient. 

    “We applaud Representatives Bacon and Nadler for their continued leadership on the Living Donor Protection Act. Taking this new approach of splitting the bill to ensure a smoother passage is an appropriate and needed step. These bills are a bipartisan approach to address the national organ shortage crisis, remove barriers to transplantation and recognize the courage and generosity of those who choose to save lives through donation. We urge Congress to pass this legislation quickly,” said Kevin Longino, CEO, National Kidney Foundation and a kidney transplant recipient.

    “As nonprofit dialysis providers, kidney transplant is an ideal outcome for many of our patients and legislation to protect and support living donors is critical to our patient-centered mission,” said Monica Massaro, Executive Director, Nonprofit Kidney Care Alliance.

    “Polycystic kidney disease currently has no cure, and for many of the 600,000 patients living in the US, organ transplantation becomes their best path forward when kidney function declines. Living donors don’t just extend lives—they reduce strain on our health care system and save taxpayer money by helping patients avoid dialysis. Yet needless barriers disincentivize many from stepping up to help. The Living Donor Protection Act is a commonsense, bipartisan solution that will ensure living donors are protected, not penalized, for their generosity,” said Susan Bushnell, President and CEO, Polycystic Kidney Disease (PKD) Foundation.

    “As a pioneer in transplantation since performing New York State’s first living donor kidney transplant in 1963, The Rogosin Institute believes that kidney transplantation is the ideal treatment for patients with end-stage kidney disease. We are proud to wholeheartedly endorse all components of the Living Donor Protection Act.  Importantly, the Act will remove barriers to donation such as insurance uncertainty and financial insecurity. Rogosin extends our thanks to the bipartisan members of Congress supporting this critical legislation. We thank Congressmen Bacon and Nadler for championing the Living Donor Protection Act,” said The Rogosin Institute.

    “Living organ donors save people’s lives and should be able to give the gift of life without fear of insurance discrimination or financial retribution, especially as they recover from surgery. The Living Donor Protection Act rightfully protects these selfless individuals from this. Thank you, Sens. Cotton and Gillibrand and Reps. Bacon and Nadler for your bipartisan leadership and for standing up for living organ donors,” said Maureen McBride, Ph.D., CEO, United Network for Organ Sharing.

    The text of the bills can be found here and here.

    ###

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Michigan Receives Disaster Declaration from President Trump for Northern Michigan Ice Storm Recovery Efforts

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Jack Bergman (MI-1)

    Today, Rep. Jack Bergman joined Governor Gretchen Whitmer announcing that President Donald Trump has approved Michigan’s request for a disaster declaration to help communities impacted by the historic ice storm in Northern Michigan earlier this year. The devastating storm knocked out power and communications and left hundreds of miles of roads blocked by fallen trees and debris. 

    “President Trump’s approval of a Major Disaster Declaration for the counties impacted by March’s devastating ice storm is welcome news,” said U.S. Representative Jack Bergman. “I’m grateful to his Administration for working to get this done. This long-awaited decision unlocks critical resources to help our communities recover and rebuild as quickly as possible. It’s been a true team effort – from local agencies to state and federal partners. Northern Michigan is no stranger to tough times – but it’s in moments like these, when our communities rally and move forward together, that the true spirit of Northern Michigan shines brightest.”

    “Yesterday, I spoke to President Trump who confirmed that communities in Northern Michigan impacted by the historic ice storm damage earlier thisnyear will start to receive federal disaster funding,” said Governor Whitmer. “With this initial support, we can help communities recover costs associated with cleanup efforts. I want to thank the president and our congressional delegation for supporting our request, and I look forward to collaborating further on much-needed additional resources. Michiganders across the state stepped up to help our neighbors, and while other parts of our request remain under review, we will continue advocating together to help Northern Michigan recover and rebuild.”

    “Many Northern Michigan individuals, families, and small businesses are still recovering from the historic ice storms that hit our state earlier this year,” said Lt. Governor Garlin Gilchrist II. “This federal emergency declaration will help local leaders, communities, and Northern Michigan families get back on their feet and move forward with their lives. While this storm was devastating, Michiganders are strong, and we will Stand Tall together.” 

    “I’m pleased that funding is coming to Northern Michigan to bolster the ongoing recovery efforts following the ice storm this March,” said U.S. Senator Gary Peters. “The State of Michigan and local emergency managers continue to work hard because this job is not finished, and I’ll keep fighting to help our communities get the resources they need to bounce back stronger.” 

    “The Michigan State Police has supported response efforts from the moment this storm began, coordinating statewide resources through the State Emergency Operations Center to assist local communities impacted by the storm,” said Col. James F. Grady II, director of the MSP. “This federal declaration is a crucial next step. It allows us to continue supporting our partners through long-term recovery.” 

    Federal Disaster Declaration

    The declaration opens the path to Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Public Assistance in Alcona, Alpena, Antrim, Charlevoix, Cheboygan, Crawford, Emmet, Kalkaska, Mackinac, Montmorency, Oscoda, Otsego, and Presque Isle Counties and the Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians. The administration continues to review the request for Individual Assistance and Public Assistance under Schedule F. 

    Advocating for Northern Michigan

      On June 25th, Rep. Jack Bergman led a letter with the entire Michigan Congressional Delegation, urging President Donald J. Trump in the strongest possible terms,to approve Governor Whitmer’s May 16 request for a Major Disaster Declaration.

    On May 30th, Rep. Jack Bergman joined Michigan USDA Farm Service Agency (FSA) Director Joel Johnson to announce that assistance through the Emergency Conservation Program (ECP) and Emergency Forest Restoration Program (EFRP) is on the way for Northern Michigan. Both programs are designed to help landowners recover from severe storm damage and restore their operations.

    On May 19th, Rep. Jack Bergman expressed his full support for Governor Gretchen Whitmer’s request for a Presidential Major Disaster Declaration in response to the ice storm that struck Northern Michigan and the Upper Peninsula in March.

    On April 5th, Rep. Bergman visited the affected counties and met with local emergency leaders, linemen, and first responders to discuss the needs across the region.

    State Actions 

    On March 31, Governor Whitmer declared a state of emergency to respond to the storm’s impact. The declaration initially covered 10 counties and was expanded to include 12 counties: Alcona, Alpena, Antrim, Charlevoix, Cheboygan, Crawford, Emmet, Mackinac, Montmorency, Oscoda, Otsego, and Presque Isle counties. Governor Whitmer also deployed the Michigan National Guard to provide more personnel and specialized equipment to help with ice storm recovery efforts in northern Michigan. Lastly, the Governor Whitmer declared an energy emergency in the Upper Peninsula to help expedite delivery of fuel and other critical supplies to impacted areas. 

    On May 16, Governor Whitmer submitted a formal request for a major disaster declaration to help Northern Michigan recover and rebuild from the historic ice storms that hit the region hard in late March. The governor also traveled to the White House to meet with President Trump, advocating for federal assistance for Northern Michigan. The governor previously asked for an Emergency Declaration, which would authorize up to $5 million in immediate public assistance to support emergency efforts, including debris management needs.  

    She will continue working with the administration to pursue further relief from FEMA, and her request for individual assistance (IA) remains under review by the federal administration. IA can include grants for temporary housing and home repairs, low-cost loans to cover uninsured property losses, and other programs to help individuals and business owners recover from the effects of the disaster. She will also seek resources for hazard mitigation measures statewide.  

    Resources

    Residents and business owners who sustained losses in the designated areas can begin applying for assistance at www.DisasterAssistance.gov, by calling 800-621-FEMA (3362), or by using the FEMA App. Anyone using a relay service, such as video relay service (VRS), captioned telephone service or others, can give FEMA the number for that service.  

    On June 11, the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) separately granted an administrative disaster declaration for Cheboygan County and the contiguous counties of Charlevoix, Emmet, Mackinac, Montmorency, Otsego, and Presque Isle. SBA established two Disaster Loan Outreach Centers for one-on-one assistance, open now through July 26 at 2:00pm:  

    229 Court St. 

    Cheboygan, MI 49721 

    8288 S. Pleasantview Rd. 

    Harbor Springs, MI 49740 

    Loan applications are also available online or by mail. For additional information on low-interest SBA loans or the application process, visit the MySBA Loan Portal or call 1-800-659-2955. The physical loan application deadline is Aug. 8. Small businesses and non-profits have until March 9, 2026, to apply for EIDLs (working capital loans). So far SBA has disbursed $572,322 in loans for this disaster. 

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI: Five Star Bancorp Announces Second Quarter 2025 Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    RANCHO CORDOVA, Calif., July 23, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Five Star Bancorp (Nasdaq: FSBC) (“Five Star” or the “Company”), a holding company that operates through its wholly owned banking subsidiary, Five Star Bank (the “Bank”), today reported net income of $14.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025, as compared to $13.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and $10.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2024.

    Second Quarter Highlights

    Performance and operating highlights for the Company for the periods noted below included the following:

        Three months ended  
    (in thousands, except per share and share data)   June 30,
    2025    		       March 31,
    2025    		       June 30,
    2024    		  
    Return on average assets (“ROAA”)   1.37 %     1.30 %     1.23 %
    Return on average equity (“ROAE”)   14.17 %     13.28 %     11.72 %
    Pre-tax income $ 20,099     $ 18,391     $ 15,152  
    Pre-tax, pre-provision income(1) $ 22,599     $ 20,291     $ 17,152  
    Net income $ 14,508     $ 13,111     $ 10,782  
    Basic earnings per common share $ 0.68     $ 0.62     $ 0.51  
    Diluted earnings per common share $ 0.68     $ 0.62     $ 0.51  
    Weighted average basic common shares outstanding   21,225,831       21,209,881       21,039,798  
    Weighted average diluted common shares outstanding   21,269,265       21,253,588       21,058,085  
    Shares outstanding at end of period   21,360,991       21,329,235       21,319,583  
                           
    (1)See the section entitled “Non-GAAP Reconciliation (Unaudited)” for a reconciliation of this non-GAAP financial measure.
     

    James E. Beckwith, President and Chief Executive Officer, commented:

    “We are very pleased to report an exceptional quarter where the continuation of our organic growth strategy fueled new account openings and resulted in growth in loans and deposits. Total loans held for investment increased by $136.2 million, or 3.76% (15.04% when annualized), and total deposits increased by $158.3 million, or 4.24% (16.94% when annualized). Net interest margin increased by eight basis points to 3.53%, while our efficiency ratio decreased to 41.03% compared to 42.58% for the first quarter of 2025. Short-term borrowings remained at zero as of June 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024. This quarter, we declared another dividend to shareholders, which exemplifies our commitment to shareholder value.

    This success serves as a strong testimony to our people, technology, operating efficiencies, conservative underwriting practices, exceptional credit quality, and prudent approach to portfolio management, which we believe will continue to benefit our clients, employees, community, and shareholders. It is also attributable to our relationship-based banking approach, where clients receive high-tech and high-touch concierge business banking services.

    We look forward to bringing these services to the Walnut Creek market, where we expect to open an office in the third quarter of 2025. Since our expansion in the San Francisco Bay Area began in June 2023, the team has grown to 34 employees with $456.9 million in deposits as of June 30, 2025. We also look forward to the continued growth of business verticals, including Food, Agribusiness, and Diversified Industries where we believe clients will benefit from our global trade services and exceptional treasury management tools.

    As we look to the second half of 2025, we are humbled and proud of our team’s accomplishments. We also thank our employees for their outstanding commitment to ensuring Five Star Bank remains a safe, trusted, and steadfast banking partner.”

    Financial highlights as of and during the three months ended June 30, 2025 included the following:

    • The San Francisco Bay Area team increased from 31 to 34 employees and generated deposit balances totaling $456.9 million at June 30, 2025, an increase of $77.2 million from March 31, 2025.
    • The Company hired five new Business Development Officers, increasing from 35 at March 31, 2025 to 40 at June 30, 2025.
    • Cash and cash equivalents were $483.8 million, representing 12.42% of total deposits at June 30, 2025, as compared to 12.11% at March 31, 2025.
    • Total deposits increased by $158.3 million, or 4.24%, during the three months ended June 30, 2025, due to increases in non-wholesale deposits that exceeded decreases in wholesale deposits, which the Company defines as brokered deposits and California Time Deposit Program deposits. During the three months ended June 30, 2025, non-wholesale deposits increased by $191.6 million, or 6.29%, and wholesale deposits decreased by $33.4 million, or 4.84%.
    • The Company had no short-term borrowings at June 30, 2025 or March 31, 2025.
    • Consistent, disciplined management of expenses contributed to our efficiency ratio of 41.03% for the three months ended June 30, 2025, as compared to 42.58% for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 44.07% for the three months ended June 30, 2024.
    • For the three months ended June 30, 2025, net interest margin was 3.53%, as compared to 3.45% for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 3.39% for the three months ended June 30, 2024. The effective Federal Funds rate was 4.33% as of June 30, 2025, remaining constant from March 31, 2025 and decreasing from 5.33% at June 30, 2024.
    • Other comprehensive loss was $0.3 million during the three months ended June 30, 2025. Unrealized losses, net of tax effect, on available-for-sale securities were $12.0 million as of June 30, 2025. Total carrying value of held-to-maturity and available-for-sale securities represented 0.06% and 2.22% of total interest-earning assets, respectively, as of June 30, 2025.
    • The Company’s common equity Tier 1 capital ratio was 10.85% and 11.00% as of June 30, 2025 and March 31, 2025, respectively. The Bank continues to meet all requirements to be considered “well-capitalized” under applicable regulatory guidelines.
    • Loan and deposit growth in the three and twelve months ended June 30, 2025 was as follows:
    (in thousands) June 30,
    2025    		   March 31,
    2025    		   $ Change   % Change
    Loans held for investment $ 3,758,025     $ 3,621,819     $ 136,206       3.76 %
    Non-interest-bearing deposits   1,004,061       933,652       70,409       7.54 %
    Interest-bearing deposits   2,890,561       2,802,702       87,859       3.13 %
                   
    (in thousands) June 30,
    2025    		   June 30,
    2024    		   $ Change   % Change
    Loans held for investment $ 3,758,025     $ 3,266,291     $ 491,734       15.05 %
    Non-interest-bearing deposits   1,004,061       825,733       178,328       21.60 %
    Interest-bearing deposits   2,890,561       2,323,898       566,663       24.38 %
    • The ratio of nonperforming loans to loans held for investment at period end increased from 0.05% at March 31, 2025 to 0.06% at June 30, 2025. The increase was due to one commercial real estate loan being put on nonaccrual status during the quarter.
    • The Company’s Board of Directors declared on April 17, 2025, and the Company subsequently paid, a cash dividend of $0.20 per share during the three months ended June 30, 2025. The Company’s Board of Directors subsequently declared another cash dividend of $0.20 per share on July 17, 2025, which the Company expects to pay on August 11, 2025 to shareholders of record as of August 4, 2025.

    Summary Results

    Three months ended June 30, 2025, as compared to three months ended March 31, 2025

    The Company’s net income was $14.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025, as compared to $13.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025. Net interest income increased by $2.5 million during the three months ended June 30, 2025, as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2025, primarily due to an increase in interest income driven by loan growth and an improvement in the average yield on loans, partially offset by an increase in interest expense driven by deposit growth. The provision for credit losses increased by $0.6 million, with loan growth and increases in net charge-offs during the three months ended June 30, 2025 as the leading drivers. Non-interest income increased by $0.5 million, primarily due to an overall improvement in the estimated earnings related to investments in venture-backed funds during the three months ended June 30, 2025, as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2025. Non-interest expense increased by $0.7 million during the three months ended June 30, 2025, as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2025, primarily related to increases in business travel, conferences, training, and advertising and promotional expenses associated with expansion of the Bank’s business development teams, partially offset by an increase in deferred loan origination costs.

    Three months ended June 30, 2025, as compared to three months ended June 30, 2024

    The Company’s net income was $14.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025, as compared to $10.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2024. Net interest income increased by $7.4 million during the three months ended June 30, 2025, as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2024, primarily due to an increase in interest income driven by loan growth and an improvement in the average yield on loans, partially offset by an increase in interest expense driven by deposit growth. The provision for credit losses increased by $0.5 million, with increases in net charge-offs during the three months ended June 30, 2025 as the leading driver. Non-interest income increased by $0.2 million, primarily due to an overall improvement in the estimated earnings related to investments in venture-backed funds, partially offset by a decrease in the volume of loans sold during the three months ended June 30, 2025, as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2024. Non-interest expense increased by $2.2 million during the three months ended June 30, 2025, as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2024, with an increase in salaries and employee benefits related to increased headcount as the leading driver.

    The following is a summary of the components of the Company’s operating results and performance ratios for the periods indicated:

        Three months ended        
    (in thousands, except per share data)   June 30,
    2025    		   March 31,
    2025    		   $ Change   % Change
    Selected operating data:                    
    Net interest income   $ 36,515     $ 33,977     $ 2,538       7.47 %
    Provision for credit losses     2,500       1,900       600       31.58 %
    Non-interest income     1,810       1,359       451       33.19 %
    Non-interest expense     15,726       15,045       681       4.53 %
    Pre-tax income     20,099       18,391       1,708       9.29 %
    Provision for income taxes     5,591       5,280       311       5.89 %
    Net income   $ 14,508     $ 13,111     $ 1,397       10.66 %
    Earnings per common share:                    
    Basic   $ 0.68     $ 0.62     $ 0.06       9.68 %
    Diluted   $ 0.68     $ 0.62     $ 0.06       9.68 %
    Performance and other financial ratios:                    
    ROAA     1.37 %     1.30 %            
    ROAE     14.17 %     13.28 %            
    Net interest margin     3.53 %     3.45 %            
    Cost of funds     2.53 %     2.56 %            
    Efficiency ratio     41.03 %     42.58 %            
                         
        Three months ended            
    (in thousands, except per share data)   June 30,
    2025    		   June 30,
    2024    		     $ Change     % Change
    Selected operating data:                    
    Net interest income   $ 36,515     $ 29,092     $ 7,423       25.52 %
    Provision for credit losses     2,500       2,000       500       25.00 %
    Non-interest income     1,810       1,573       237       15.07 %
    Non-interest expense     15,726       13,513       2,213       16.38 %
    Pre-tax income     20,099       15,152       4,947       32.65 %
    Provision for income taxes     5,591       4,370       1,221       27.94 %
    Net income   $ 14,508     $ 10,782     $ 3,726       34.56 %
    Earnings per common share:                    
    Basic   $ 0.68     $ 0.51     $ 0.17       33.33 %
    Diluted   $ 0.68     $ 0.51     $ 0.17       33.33 %
    Performance and other financial ratios:                    
    ROAA     1.37 %     1.23 %            
    ROAE     14.17 %     11.72 %        
    Net interest margin     3.53 %     3.39 %        
    Cost of funds     2.53 %     2.56 %        
    Efficiency ratio     41.03 %     44.07 %        
                             

    Balance Sheet Summary

    (in thousands)   June 30,
    2025    		   March 31,
    2025    		   $ Change   % Change  
    Selected financial condition data:                  
    Total assets   $ 4,413,473     $ 4,245,057     $ 168,416       3.97 %
    Cash and cash equivalents     483,810       452,571       31,239       6.90 %
    Total loans held for investment     3,758,025       3,621,819       136,206       3.76 %
    Total investments     97,575       99,696       (2,121 )     (2.13 )%
    Total liabilities     3,996,731       3,838,606       158,125       4.12 %
    Total deposits     3,894,622       3,736,354       158,268       4.24 %
    Subordinated notes, net     73,968       73,932       36       0.05 %
    Total shareholders’ equity     416,742       406,451       10,291       2.53 %
    • Insured and collateralized deposits were approximately $2.6 billion, representing 67.06% of total deposits as of June 30, 2025, as compared to 67.55% as of March 31, 2025. Net uninsured and uncollateralized deposits were approximately $1.3 billion as of June 30, 2025, increasing from $1.2 billion at March 31, 2025.
    • Non-wholesale deposit accounts constituted 83.14% of total deposits as of June 30, 2025, as compared to 81.53% at March 31, 2025. Deposit relationships of greater than $5 million represented 59.91% of total deposits, as compared to 60.87% as of March 31, 2025, and had an average age of approximately 8.34 years as of June 30, 2025, as compared to 8.80 years as of March 31, 2025.
    • Total deposits as of June 30, 2025 were $3.9 billion, an increase of $158.3 million, or 4.24%, from March 31, 2025 comprised of increases in both interest-bearing and non-interest-bearing deposits. The primary driver of interest-bearing deposit growth was new money market deposit accounts opened during the quarter, adding $87.4 million in new balances. Non-interest-bearing deposit growth was driven by new accounts opened during the quarter, adding $68.7 million in new balances.
    • Cash and cash equivalents as of June 30, 2025 were $483.8 million, representing 12.42% of total deposits at June 30, 2025, as compared to 12.11% as of March 31, 2025.
    • Total liquidity (consisting of cash and cash equivalents and unused and immediately available borrowing capacity as set forth below) was approximately $2.2 billion as of June 30, 2025, as compared to $2.0 billion at March 31, 2025.
        June 30, 2025
    (in thousands)   Line of Credit   Letters of Credit Issued   Borrowings   Available
    Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco (“FHLB”) advances   $ 1,290,446     $ 732,500     $ —     $ 557,946  
    Federal Reserve Discount Window     926,573       —       —       926,573  
    Correspondent bank lines of credit     185,000       —       —       185,000  
    Cash and cash equivalents     —       —       —       483,810  
    Total   $ 2,402,019     $ 732,500     $ —     $ 2,153,329  
                     
    (in thousands)   June 30,
    2025    		   December 31,
    2024    		   $ Change   % Change
    Selected financial condition data:                
    Total assets   $ 4,413,473     $ 4,053,278     $ 360,195       8.89 %
    Cash and cash equivalents     483,810       352,343       131,467       37.31 %
    Total loans held for investment     3,758,025       3,532,686       225,339       6.38 %
    Total investments     97,575       100,914       (3,339 )     (3.31 )%
    Total liabilities     3,996,731       3,656,654       340,077       9.30 %
    Total deposits     3,894,622       3,557,994       336,628       9.46 %
    Subordinated notes, net     73,968       73,895       73       0.10 %
    Total shareholders’ equity     416,742       396,624       20,118       5.07 %
                                     

    The increase in total assets from December 31, 2024 to June 30, 2025 was primarily comprised of a $225.3 million increase in total loans held for investment and a $131.5 million increase in cash and cash equivalents. The $225.3 million increase in total loans held for investment between December 31, 2024 and June 30, 2025 was a result of $578.8 million in loan originations and advances, partially offset by $130.3 million and $223.1 million in loan payoffs and paydowns, respectively. The $225.3 million increase in total loans held for investment included $43.9 million in purchases of loans within the consumer concentration of the loan portfolio. The $131.5 million increase in cash and cash equivalents primarily resulted from net cash inflows related to financing and operating activities of $328.1 million and $28.1 million, respectively, partially offset by net cash outflows related to investing activities of $224.7 million.

    The increase in total liabilities from December 31, 2024 to June 30, 2025 was primarily due to an increase in interest-bearing deposits of $255.2 million. The increase in interest-bearing deposits was largely due to increases in money market and time deposits of $179.4 million and $101.9 million, respectively.

    The increase in total shareholders’ equity from December 31, 2024 to June 30, 2025 was primarily a result of net income recognized of $27.6 million and a $0.4 million increase in accumulated other comprehensive income, partially offset by $8.5 million in cash dividends paid during the period.

    Net Interest Income and Net Interest Margin

    The following is a summary of the components of net interest income for the periods indicated:

        Three months ended        
    (in thousands)   June 30,
    2025    		   March 31,
    2025    		   $ Change   % Change
    Interest and fee income   $ 60,580     $ 57,087     $ 3,493       6.12 %
    Interest expense     24,065       23,110       955       4.13 %
    Net interest income   $ 36,515     $ 33,977     $ 2,538       7.47 %
    Net interest margin     3.53 %     3.45 %        
                     
        Three months ended        
    (in thousands)   June 30,
    2025    		   June 30,
    2024    		   $ Change   % Change
    Interest and fee income   $ 60,580     $ 48,998     $ 11,582       23.64 %
    Interest expense     24,065       19,906       4,159       20.89 %
    Net interest income   $ 36,515     $ 29,092     $ 7,423       25.52 %
    Net interest margin     3.53 %     3.39 %        
                             

    The following table shows the components of net interest income and net interest margin for the quarterly periods indicated:

        Three months ended
        June 30, 2025   March 31, 2025   June 30, 2024
    (in thousands)   Average
    Balance    		   Interest
    Income/
    Expense    		   Yield/ Rate   Average
    Balance    		   Interest
    Income/
    Expense    		   Yield/ Rate   Average
    Balance    		   Interest
    Income/
    Expense    		   Yield/ Rate
    Assets                                    
    Interest-earning deposits in banks   $ 361,866     $ 3,987       4.42 %   $ 328,571     $ 3,575       4.41 %   $ 148,936     $ 1,986       5.36 %
    Investment securities     97,886       577       2.37 %     100,474       581       2.34 %     105,819       650       2.47 %
    Loans held for investment and sale     3,691,616       56,016       6.09 %     3,567,992       52,931       6.02 %     3,197,921       46,362       5.83 %
    Total interest-earning assets     4,151,368       60,580       5.85 %     3,997,037       57,087       5.79 %     3,452,676       48,998       5.71 %
    Interest receivable and other assets, net     101,632               93,543               84,554          
    Total assets   $ 4,253,000             $ 4,090,580             $ 3,537,230          
                                         
    Liabilities and shareholders’ equity                                    
    Interest-bearing transaction accounts   $ 283,369     $ 1,043       1.48 %   $ 303,822     $ 1,112       1.48 %   $ 291,470     $ 1,104       1.52 %
    Savings accounts     121,692       801       2.64 %     123,599       772       2.53 %     120,080       856       2.87 %
    Money market accounts     1,647,628       13,270       3.23 %     1,540,879       12,435       3.27 %     1,547,814       13,388       3.48 %
    Time accounts     726,295       7,790       4.30 %     706,528       7,629       4.38 %     272,887       3,369       4.96 %
    Subordinated notes and other borrowings     73,967       1,161       6.30 %     73,908       1,162       6.37 %     75,747       1,189       6.31 %
    Total interest-bearing liabilities     2,852,951       24,065       3.38 %     2,748,736       23,110       3.41 %     2,307,998       19,906       3.47 %
    Demand accounts     957,034               910,954               817,668          
    Interest payable and other liabilities     32,406               30,389               41,429          
    Shareholders’ equity     410,609               400,501               370,135          
    Total liabilities & shareholders’ equity   $ 4,253,000             $ 4,090,580             $ 3,537,230          
                                         
    Net interest spread             2.47 %             2.38 %             2.24 %
    Net interest income/margin       $ 36,515       3.53 %       $ 33,977       3.45 %       $ 29,092       3.39 %
                                                                 

    Net interest income during the three months ended June 30, 2025 increased $2.5 million, or 7.47%, to $36.5 million compared to $34.0 million during the three months ended March 31, 2025. Net interest margin totaled 3.53% for the three months ended June 30, 2025, an increase of eight basis points compared to the prior quarter. The increase in net interest income is primarily attributable to an additional $3.5 million in interest income, mainly due to a $123.6 million, or 3.46%, increase in the average balance of loans and a seven basis point improvement in the average yield on loans during the three months ended June 30, 2025 compared to the prior quarter. The increase in interest income was partially offset by an additional $1.0 million in interest expense, which was mainly driven by a $150.2 million, or 4.19%, increase in the average balance of deposits at an average rate of two basis points lower than the prior quarter.

    As compared to the three months ended June 30, 2024, net interest income increased $7.4 million, or 25.52%, to $36.5 million from $29.1 million. Net interest margin totaled 3.53% for the three months ended June 30, 2025, an increase of 14 basis points compared to the same quarter of the prior year. The increase in net interest income is primarily attributable to an additional $11.6 million in interest income, mainly due to a $493.7 million, or 15.44%, increase in the average balance of loans and a 26 basis point improvement in the average yield on loans during the three months ended June 30, 2025 compared to the same quarter of the prior year. The increase in interest income was partially offset by an additional $4.2 million in interest expense compared to the same quarter of the prior year. The increase in interest expense is mainly attributable to a $686.1 million, or 22.50%, increase in the average balance of deposits at an average rate of one basis point lower during the three months ended June 30, 2025 compared to the same quarter of the prior year.

    Loans by Type

    The following table provides loan balances, excluding deferred loan fees, by type as of the dates shown:

    (in thousands)   June 30, 2025   March 31, 2025
    Real estate:        
    Commercial   $ 3,066,627     $ 2,941,201  
    Commercial land and development     1,422       3,556  
    Commercial construction     112,399       113,002  
    Residential construction     5,479       5,747  
    Residential     33,132       34,053  
    Farmland     51,579       43,643  
    Commercial:        
    Secured     173,855       170,525  
    Unsecured     37,568       34,970  
    Consumer and other     278,215       277,093  
    Net deferred loan fees     (2,251 )     (1,971 )
    Total loans held for investment   $ 3,758,025     $ 3,621,819  
                     

    Interest-bearing Deposits

    The following table provides interest-bearing deposit balances by type as of the dates shown:

    (in thousands)   June 30, 2025   March 31, 2025
    Interest-bearing transaction accounts   $ 292,257     $ 295,633  
    Money market accounts     1,704,652       1,577,473  
    Savings accounts     121,567       128,210  
    Time accounts     772,085       801,386  
    Total interest-bearing deposits   $ 2,890,561     $ 2,802,702  
                     

    Asset Quality

    Allowance for Credit Losses

    At June 30, 2025, the Company’s allowance for credit losses was $40.2 million, as compared to $37.8 million at December 31, 2024. The $2.4 million increase in the allowance is due to a $4.6 million provision for credit losses recorded during the six months ended June 30, 2025, partially offset by net charge-offs of $2.2 million, primarily attributable to commercial and industrial loans, during the same period.

    The Company’s ratio of nonperforming loans to loans held for investment increased from 0.05% at December 31, 2024 to 0.06% at June 30, 2025. Loans designated as watch decreased from $123.4 million to $106.5 million between December 31, 2024 and June 30, 2025. Loans designated as substandard increased from $2.6 million to $4.2 million between December 31, 2024 and June 30, 2025. There were no loans with doubtful risk grades at June 30, 2025 or December 31, 2024.

    A summary of the allowance for credit losses by loan class is as follows:

        June 30, 2025   December 31, 2024
    (in thousands)   Amount   % of Total   Amount   % of Total
    Real estate:                
    Commercial   $ 27,792       69.19 %   $ 25,864       68.44 %
    Commercial land and development     33       0.08 %     78       0.21 %
    Commercial construction     2,575       6.41 %     2,268       6.00 %
    Residential construction     75       0.19 %     64       0.17 %
    Residential     334       0.83 %     270       0.71 %
    Farmland     723       1.80 %     607       1.61 %
          31,532       78.50 %     29,151       77.14 %
    Commercial:                
    Secured     5,623       14.00 %     5,866       15.52 %
    Unsecured     417       1.04 %     278       0.74 %
          6,040       15.04 %     6,144       16.26 %
    Consumer and other     2,595       6.46 %     2,496       6.60 %
    Total allowance for credit losses   $ 40,167       100.00 %   $ 37,791       100.00 %
                                     

    The ratio of allowance for credit losses to loans held for investment remained at 1.07% at June 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024.

    Non-interest Income

    The following table presents the key components of non-interest income for the periods indicated:

        Three months ended        
    (in thousands)   June 30,
    2025    		   March 31,
    2025    		   $ Change   % Change
    Service charges on deposit accounts   $ 196     $ 215     $ (19 )     (8.84 )%
    Gain on sale of loans     119       125       (6 )     (4.80 )%
    Loan-related fees     468       448       20       4.46 %
    FHLB stock dividends     325       331       (6 )     (1.81 )%
    Earnings on bank-owned life insurance     220       161       59       36.65 %
    Other income     482       79       403       510.13 %
    Total non-interest income   $ 1,810     $ 1,359     $ 451       33.19 %
                                     

    Other income. The increase resulted primarily from an overall improvement in the estimated earnings related to investments in venture-backed funds during the three months ended June 30, 2025 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2025.

    The following table presents the key components of non-interest income for the periods indicated:

        Three months ended      
    (in thousands)   June 30,
    2025    		   June 30,
    2024    		   $ Change   % Change
    Service charges on deposit accounts   $ 196     $ 189     $ 7       3.70 %
    Gain on sale of loans     119       449       (330 )     (73.50 )%
    Loan-related fees     468       370       98       26.49 %
    FHLB stock dividends     325       329       (4 )     (1.22 )%
    Earnings on bank-owned life insurance     220       158       62       39.24 %
    Other income     482       78       404       517.95 %
    Total non-interest income   $ 1,810     $ 1,573     $ 237       15.07 %
                                     

    Gain on sale of loans. The decrease related primarily to an overall decline in the volume of loans sold, partially offset by an improvement in the effective yield of loans sold. During the three months ended June 30, 2025, approximately $1.6 million of loans were sold with an effective yield of 7.60%, as compared to approximately $6.8 million of loans sold with an effective yield of 6.60% during the three months ended June 30, 2024.

    Other income. The increase related primarily to an overall improvement in the estimated earnings related to investments in venture-backed funds during the three months ended June 30, 2025 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2024.

    Non-interest Expense

    The following table presents the key components of non-interest expense for the periods indicated:

        Three months ended        
    (in thousands)   June 30,
    2025    		   March 31,
    2025    		   $ Change   % Change
    Salaries and employee benefits   $ 8,910     $ 9,134     $ (224 )     (2.45 )%
    Occupancy and equipment     657       637       20       3.14 %
    Data processing and software     1,508       1,457       51       3.50 %
    Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) insurance     470       455       15       3.30 %
    Professional services     918       913       5       0.55 %
    Advertising and promotional     865       522       343       65.71 %
    Loan-related expenses     423       319       104       32.60 %
    Other operating expenses     1,975       1,608       367       22.82 %
    Total non-interest expense   $ 15,726     $ 15,045     $ 681       4.53 %
                                     

    Salaries and employee benefits. The decrease related primarily to: (i) a $0.6 million increase in deferred loan origination costs due to greater loan originations, net of purchased consumer loans; and (ii) $0.1 million decrease in salaries, benefits, and bonus expense. The decrease was partially offset by a $0.5 million increase in commissions expense due to greater loan originations, net of purchased consumer loans, period-over-period.

    Advertising and promotional. The increase related primarily to additional expenses incurred to support the expansion of the Bank’s business development teams, including a $0.1 million increase related to business development expenses, a $0.1 million increase in expenses related to sponsored events and partnerships, and a $0.1 million increase in expenses related to donations.

    Loan-related expenses. The increase related primarily to a $0.1 million increase in expenses related to inspections to support the increase in loan originations and annual loan reviews.

    Other operating expenses. The increase was primarily due to a $0.2 million increase in business travel expenses and a $0.1 million increase in expenses related to conferences and trainings attended.

    The following table presents the key components of non-interest expense for the periods indicated:

        Three months ended        
    (in thousands)   June 30,
    2025    		   June 30,
    2024    		   $ Change   % Change
    Salaries and employee benefits   $ 8,910     $ 7,803     $ 1,107       14.19 %
    Occupancy and equipment     657       646       11       1.70 %
    Data processing and software     1,508       1,235       273       22.11 %
    FDIC insurance     470       390       80       20.51 %
    Professional services     918       767       151       19.69 %
    Advertising and promotional     865       615       250       40.65 %
    Loan-related expenses     423       297       126       42.42 %
    Other operating expenses     1,975       1,760       215       12.22 %
    Total non-interest expense   $ 15,726     $ 13,513     $ 2,213       16.38 %
                                     

    Salaries and employee benefits. The increase related primarily to: (i) a $1.2 million increase in salaries, benefits, and bonus expense, mainly related to a 16.58% increase in headcount between June 30, 2024 and June 30, 2025; and (ii) a $0.1 million increase in commissions paid. This increase was partially offset by a $0.2 million increase in deferred loan origination costs due to a greater number of loan originations, net of purchased consumer loans, period-over-period.

    Data processing and software. The increase was primarily due to: (i) increased usage of our digital banking platform; (ii) higher transaction volumes related to the increased number of loan and deposit accounts; and (iii) an increased number of licenses required for new users on our loan origination and documentation system.

    Professional services. The increase was primarily due to a $0.1 million increase in fees paid for compensation and business development consulting services.

    Advertising and promotional. The increase related primarily to additional expenses incurred to support the expansion of the Bank’s business development teams, including a $0.1 million increase in expenses related to sponsored events and partnerships and a $0.1 million increase related to business development expenses.

    Loan-related expenses. The increase related primarily to a $0.1 million increase in expenses related to inspections to support the increase in loan originations and annual loan reviews.

    Other operating expenses. The increase was primarily due to a $0.1 million increase in travel expense and a $0.1 million increase in expenses related to conferences, trainings, and professional association memberships.

    Provision for Income Taxes

    On July 4, 2025, the President signed H.R. 1, the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act,” into law. The legislation includes several changes to federal tax law that generally allow for more favorable deductibility of certain business expenses beginning in 2025, including the restoration of immediate expensing of domestic R&D expenditures, reinstatement of 100% bonus depreciation, and more favorable rules for determining the limitation on business interest expense. The Act also made certain changes to the deductibility of the cost of meals and charitable contributions that are effective for tax years beginning after Dec. 31, 2025. These changes were not reflected in the income tax provision for the period ended June 30, 2025, as enactment occurred after the balance sheet date. The Company is currently evaluating the impact on future periods.

    Three months ended June 30, 2025, as compared to three months ended March 31, 2025

    Provision for income taxes increased to $5.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025 from $5.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025, which was primarily due to an increase in taxable income recognized during the three months ended June 30, 2025. This increase was partially offset by a net $0.2 million reduction to the provision recorded during the three months ended June 30, 2025. This adjustment related to a tax law change for the state of California effective as of June 30, 2025, which requires a transition from a three-factor apportionment formula to a single-sales-factor formula for determining state income tax. As such, the Company recorded a net benefit of approximately $0.9 million relating to the current year provision, which was partially offset by a $0.7 million expense relating to the remeasuring of the deferred tax assets and liabilities as of June 30, 2025. The effective tax rates were 27.82% and 28.71% for the three months ended June 30, 2025 and March 31, 2025, respectively.

    Three months ended June 30, 2025, as compared to three months ended June 30, 2024

    Provision for income taxes increased by $1.2 million, or 27.94%, for the three months ended June 30, 2025 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2024. This increase was primarily driven by an increase in taxable income. This increase was partially offset by a net $0.2 million reduction to the provision recorded during the three months ended June 30, 2025. This adjustment related to a tax law change for the state of California effective as of June 30, 2025, which requires a transition from a three-factor apportionment formula to a single-sales-factor formula for determining state income tax. As such, the Company recorded a net benefit of approximately $0.9 million relating to the current year provision, which was partially offset by a $0.7 million expense relating to the remeasuring of the deferred tax assets and liabilities as of June 30, 2025. The effective tax rates were 27.82% and 28.84% for the three months ended June 30, 2025 and June 30, 2024, respectively.

    Webcast Details

    Five Star Bancorp will host a live webcast for analysts and investors on Thursday, July 24, 2025 at 1:00 PM ET (10:00 AM PT) to discuss its second quarter financial results. To view the live webcast, visit the “News & Events” section of the Company’s website under “Events” at https://investors.fivestarbank.com/news-events/events. The webcast will be archived on the Company’s website for a period of 90 days.

    About Five Star Bancorp

    Five Star is a bank holding company headquartered in Rancho Cordova, California. Five Star operates through its wholly owned banking subsidiary, Five Star Bank. The Bank has eight branches in Northern California.

    Forward-Looking Statements

    This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements represent plans, estimates, objectives, goals, guidelines, expectations, intentions, projections, and statements of the Company’s beliefs concerning future events, business plans, objectives, expected operating results, and the assumptions upon which those statements are based. Forward-looking statements include without limitation, any statement that may predict, forecast, indicate, or imply future results, performance, or achievements, and are typically identified with words such as “may,” “could,” “should,” “will,” “would,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “aim,” “intend,” “plan,” or words or phases of similar meaning. The Company cautions that the forward-looking statements are based largely on the Company’s expectations and are subject to a number of known and unknown risks and uncertainties that are subject to change based on factors which are, in many instances, beyond the Company’s control. Such forward-looking statements are based on various assumptions (some of which may be beyond the Company’s control) and are subject to risks and uncertainties, which change over time, and other factors, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those currently anticipated. New risks and uncertainties may emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for the Company to predict their occurrence or how they will affect the Company. If one or more of the factors affecting the Company’s forward-looking information and statements proves incorrect, then the Company’s actual results, performance, or achievements could differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, forward-looking information and statements contained in this press release. Therefore, the Company cautions you not to place undue reliance on the Company’s forward-looking information and statements. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements are set forth in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024 and Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2025, in each case under the section entitled “Risk Factors,” and other documents filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission from time to time.

    The Company disclaims any duty to revise or update the forward-looking statements, whether written or oral, to reflect actual results or changes in the factors affecting the forward-looking statements, except as specifically required by law.

    Condensed Financial Data (Unaudited)

        Three months ended
    (in thousands, except per share and share data)   June 30,
    2025    		   March 31,
    2025    		   June 30,
    2024
    Revenue and Expense Data            
    Interest and fee income   $ 60,580     $ 57,087     $ 48,998  
    Interest expense     24,065       23,110       19,906  
    Net interest income     36,515       33,977       29,092  
    Provision for credit losses     2,500       1,900       2,000  
    Net interest income after provision     34,015       32,077       27,092  
    Non-interest income:            
    Service charges on deposit accounts     196       215       189  
    Gain on sale of loans     119       125       449  
    Loan-related fees     468       448       370  
    FHLB stock dividends     325       331       329  
    Earnings on bank-owned life insurance     220       161       158  
    Other income     482       79       78  
    Total non-interest income     1,810       1,359       1,573  
    Non-interest expense:            
    Salaries and employee benefits     8,910       9,134       7,803  
    Occupancy and equipment     657       637       646  
    Data processing and software     1,508       1,457       1,235  
    FDIC insurance     470       455       390  
    Professional services     918       913       767  
    Advertising and promotional     865       522       615  
    Loan-related expenses     423       319       297  
    Other operating expenses     1,975       1,608       1,760  
    Total non-interest expense     15,726       15,045       13,513  
    Income before provision for income taxes     20,099       18,391       15,152  
    Provision for income taxes     5,591       5,280       4,370  
    Net income   $ 14,508     $ 13,111     $ 10,782  
                 
    Comprehensive Income            
    Net income   $ 14,508     $ 13,111     $ 10,782  
    Net unrealized holding gain on securities available-for-sale during the period     190       1,030       295  
    Less: Income tax expense related to other comprehensive (loss) income     502       305       87  
    Other comprehensive (loss) income     (312 )     725       208  
    Total comprehensive income   $ 14,196     $ 13,836     $ 10,990  
                 
    Share and Per Share Data            
    Earnings per common share:            
    Basic   $ 0.68     $ 0.62     $ 0.51  
    Diluted   $ 0.68     $ 0.62     $ 0.51  
    Book value per share   $ 19.51     $ 19.06     $ 17.85  
    Tangible book value per share(1)   $ 19.51     $ 19.06     $ 17.85  
    Weighted average basic common shares outstanding     21,225,831       21,209,881       21,039,798  
    Weighted average diluted common shares outstanding     21,269,265       21,253,588       21,058,085  
    Shares outstanding at end of period     21,360,991       21,329,235       21,319,583  
                 
    Selected Financial Ratios            
    ROAA     1.37 %     1.30 %     1.23 %
    ROAE     14.17 %     13.28 %     11.72 %
    Net interest margin     3.53 %     3.45 %     3.39 %
    Loan to deposit(2)     96.50 %     97.01 %     103.87 %
     
    (1) See the section entitled “Non-GAAP Reconciliation (Unaudited)” for a reconciliation of this non-GAAP financial measure.

    (2) Loan balance in loan to deposit ratio is total loans held for investment and sale at period end. Deposit balance in loan to deposit ratio is total deposits at period end.
     
    (in thousands)   June 30,
    2025    		   March 31,
    2025    		   June 30,
    2024
    Balance Sheet Data            
    Cash and due from financial institutions   $ 53,724     $ 42,473     $ 28,572  
    Interest-bearing deposits in banks     430,086       410,098       161,787  
    Time deposits in banks     849       4,024       4,097  
    Securities – available-for-sale, at fair value     94,990       97,111       103,204  
    Securities – held-to-maturity, at amortized cost     2,585       2,585       2,973  
    Loans held for sale     309       2,669       5,322  
    Loans held for investment     3,758,025       3,621,819       3,266,291  
    Allowance for credit losses     (40,167 )     (39,224 )     (35,406 )
    Loans held for investment, net of allowance for credit losses     3,717,858       3,582,595       3,230,885  
    FHLB stock     15,000       15,000       15,000  
    Operating leases, right-of-use asset     7,094       5,944       6,630  
    Premises and equipment, net     1,606       1,524       1,610  
    Bank-owned life insurance     23,466       23,246       19,030  
    Interest receivable and other assets     65,906       57,788       55,107  
    Total assets   $ 4,413,473     $ 4,245,057     $ 3,634,217  
                 
    Non-interest-bearing deposits   $ 1,004,061     $ 933,652     $ 825,733  
    Interest-bearing deposits     2,890,561       2,802,702       2,323,898  
    Total deposits     3,894,622       3,736,354       3,149,631  
    Subordinated notes, net     73,968       73,932       73,822  
    Other borrowings     —       —       —  
    Operating lease liability     7,744       6,591       7,077  
    Interest payable and other liabilities     20,397       21,729       23,217  
    Total liabilities     3,996,731       3,838,606       3,253,747  
                 
    Common stock     303,155       302,788       301,968  
    Retained earnings     125,545       115,309       90,734  
    Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of taxes     (11,958 )     (11,646 )     (12,232 )
    Total shareholders’ equity     416,742       406,451       380,470  
    Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity   $ 4,413,473     $ 4,245,057     $ 3,634,217  
                 
    Quarterly Average Balance Data            
    Average loans held for investment and sale   $ 3,691,616     $ 3,567,992     $ 3,197,921  
    Average interest-earning assets     4,151,368       3,997,037       3,452,676  
    Average total assets     4,253,000       4,090,580       3,537,230  
    Average deposits     3,736,018       3,585,782       3,049,919  
    Average total equity     410,609       400,501       370,135  
                 
    Credit Quality            
    Allowance for credit losses to nonperforming loans     1,763.26 %     2,222.32 %     1,882.30 %
    Nonperforming loans to loans held for investment     0.06 %     0.05 %     0.06 %
    Nonperforming assets to total assets     0.05 %     0.04 %     0.05 %
    Nonperforming loans plus performing loan modifications to loans held for investment     0.06 %     0.05 %     0.06 %
                 
    Capital Ratios            
    Total shareholders’ equity to total assets     9.44 %     9.57 %     10.47 %
    Tangible shareholders’ equity to tangible assets(1)     9.44 %     9.57 %     10.47 %
    Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)     13.72 %     13.97 %     14.38 %
    Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)     10.85 %     11.00 %     11.27 %
    Common equity Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)     10.85 %     11.00 %     11.27 %
    Tier 1 leverage ratio     10.03 %     10.17 %     11.05 %
     
    (1) See the section entitled “Non-GAAP Reconciliation (Unaudited)” for a reconciliation of this non-GAAP financial measure.
     

    Non-GAAP Reconciliation (Unaudited)

    The Company uses financial information in its analysis of the Company’s performance that is not in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The Company believes that these non-GAAP financial measures provide useful information to management and investors that is supplementary to the Company’s financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows computed in accordance with GAAP. However, the Company acknowledges that its non-GAAP financial measures have a number of limitations. As such, investors should not view these disclosures as a substitute for results determined in accordance with GAAP. Additionally, these non-GAAP measures are not necessarily comparable to non-GAAP financial measures that other banking companies use. Other banking companies may use names similar to those the Company uses for the non-GAAP financial measures the Company discloses, but may calculate them differently. Investors should understand how the Company and other companies each calculate their non-GAAP financial measures when making comparisons.

    Tangible shareholders’ equity to tangible assets is defined as total equity less goodwill and other intangible assets, divided by total assets less goodwill and other intangible assets. The most directly comparable GAAP financial measure is total shareholders’ equity to total assets. Management believes that tangible shareholders’ equity to tangible assets is a useful financial measure because it enables management, investors, and others to assess the Company’s financial health based on tangible capital. We had no goodwill or other intangible assets at the end of any period indicated. As a result, tangible shareholders’ equity to tangible assets is the same as total shareholders’ equity to total assets at the end of each of the periods indicated.

    Tangible book value per share is defined as total shareholders’ equity less goodwill and other intangible assets, divided by the outstanding number of common shares at the end of the period. The most directly comparable GAAP financial measure is book value per share. Management believes that tangible book value per share is a useful financial measure because it enables management, investors, and others to assess the Company’s value and use of equity. We had no goodwill or other intangible assets at the end of any period indicated. As a result, tangible book value per share is the same as book value per share at the end of each of the periods indicated.

    Pre-tax, pre-provision income is defined as pre-tax income plus provision for credit losses. The most directly comparable GAAP financial measure is pre-tax income. Management believes that pre-tax, pre-provision income is a useful financial measure because it enables management, investors, and others to assess the Company’s ability to generate operating profit and capital.

    The following reconciliation table provides a more detailed analysis of this non-GAAP financial measure:

        Three months ended
    (in thousands)   June 30,
    2025    		   March 31,
    2025    		   June 30,
    2024
    Pre-tax, pre-provision income            
    Pre-tax income   $ 20,099     $ 18,391     $ 15,152  
    Add: provision for credit losses     2,500       1,900       2,000  
    Pre-tax, pre-provision income   $ 22,599     $ 20,291     $ 17,152  

    Investor Contact:
    Heather C. Luck, Chief Financial Officer
    Five Star Bancorp
    (916) 626-5008
    hluck@fivestarbank.com

    Media Contact:
    Shelley R. Wetton, Chief Marketing Officer
    Five Star Bancorp
    (916) 284-7827
    swetton@fivestarbank.com

    The MIL Network –

  • MIL-OSI: Subsea7 and Saipem announce signing of the Merger Agreement

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION IN OR INTO THE UNITED STATES, OR IN ANY OTHER JURISDICTION IN WHICH SUCH DISTRIBUTION WOULD BE PROHIBITED BY APPLICABLE LAW 

    Transaction structure and terms confirmed in line with Memorandum of Understanding

    Creating a global leader in energy services

    Milan, Luxembourg, 24 July 2025 – Saipem and Subsea7 announce that they have entered into a binding merger agreement, on terms and conditions in line with what previously communicated at the time of the signing of the Memorandum of Understanding on 23 February 2025. The merger of Saipem and Subsea7 will create a global leader in energy services. 

    Highlights

    • The company resulting from the merger1 between Saipem and Subsea7 (the “Proposed Combination”) will be renamed Saipem7 (“Saipem7”), will have revenue of approx. €21 billion2, EBITDA in excess of €2 billion3, will generate more than €800 million of Free Cash Flow4 and will have a combined backlog of €43 billion5
    • The highly complementary geographical footprints, competencies and capabilities, vessel fleets and technologies will benefit Saipem7’s global portfolio of clients
    • The diversification of the geographical footprint of Saipem and Subsea7 is reflected in the combined backlog, with no single country contributing more than 15% of total6
    • On completion, Saipem and Subsea7 shareholders will own 50% each of the share capital of Saipem7
    • Subsea7 shareholders participating to the Proposed Combination will receive 6.688 new Saipem shares for each Subsea7 share held
    • Subsea7 will distribute an extraordinary dividend to its shareholders for an amount equal to €450 million immediately prior to completion of the Proposed Combination
    • Annual synergies expected to be approximately €300 million on a run-rate basis, which will lead to material value creation for the shareholders of Saipem7
    • Saipem7 will remain incorporated in Italy and headquartered in Milan, and will have its shares listed on both the Milan and Oslo stock exchanges
    • Siem Industries, reference shareholder of Subsea7, and Eni and CDP Equity, reference shareholders of Saipem, have committed to vote in favour of the Proposed Combination
    • Completion of the Proposed Combination anticipated to occur in the second half of 2026

    The management of both Saipem and Subsea7 confirm the compelling strategic rationale in creating a global leader in energy services, particularly considering the growing size of clients’ projects. The parties believe the Proposed Combination will enhance value for all shareholders and stakeholders, both in the current market and in the long term.

    Eni, CDP Equity and Siem Industries fully support the Proposed Combination and have signed a Shareholders’ Agreement confirming the undertaking to vote in favour of the Proposed Combination. As part of this, to ensure a balanced leadership and governance structure, Saipem7’s CEO will be designated by Eni and CDP Equity and Saipem7’s Chairman of the Board of Directors will be designated by Siem Industries.

    It is currently envisaged that, upon completion of the Proposed Combination, Mr Kristian Siem will be appointed as Chairman of the Board of Directors of Saipem77 and Mr Alessandro Puliti will be appointed as CEO of Saipem78. In addition, Mr Alessandro Puliti and Mr John Evans will be appointed respectively as the Chairman and CEO of the company that will manage the Offshore Engineering & Construction business of Saipem7. Such company will be named Subsea7, branded as “Subsea7, a Saipem7 Company”, and will comprise all of Subsea7’s businesses and Saipem’s Asset Based Services business (including Offshore Wind).

    The by-laws of Saipem7 are expected to provide for loyalty shares (double votes), which will be available, upon request, to all shareholders of Saipem7.

    Strategic rationale of the Proposed Combination

    The Proposed Combination will be beneficial to the clients of both Saipem and Subsea7, bringing together the respective strengths of both companies:

    • Global reach and comprehensive solutions for clients: global operations and projects in more than 60 countries and a highly complementary footprint between the two companies. A full spectrum of offshore and onshore services, from drilling, engineering and construction to life-of-field services and decommissioning, with an increased ability to optimise project scheduling for clients in oil, gas, carbon capture and renewable energy
    • Diversified and complementary fleet: an expanded and diversified fleet of more than 60 construction vessels enhancing Saipem7’s ability to undertake a wide range of projects, from shallow water to ultra-deepwater operations, utilising a full portfolio of heavy lift, high-end J-lay, S-lay and reel-lay rigid pipeline solutions, flexible pipe and umbilical lay services, as well as market-leading wind turbine, foundations and cable lay installation capabilities
    • World-class expertise and experience: a specialised, global workforce of approximately 44,000 people, including more than 9,000 engineers and project managers contributing to delivering solutions that unlock value for clients
    • Innovation and technology: the combined expertise to foster innovation in offshore technologies, ensuring cutting-edge solutions for complex projects 

    The transaction is expected to create significant shareholder value through:

    • Synergies: annual cost and capital expenditure synergies expected to be approximately €300 million from the third year after completion of the Proposed Combination, driven by fleet optimisation (utilisation and geographical positioning of vessels and equipment), procurement (longer charter periods for leased vessels and improved terms with suppliers), sales and marketing (tendering rationalisation), and process efficiencies
    • More efficient capital expenditure programme: optimised allocation of capital across a broader, complementary vessel fleet
    • Attractive shareholder remuneration policy: Saipem7 is expected to distribute annually to its shareholders at least 40% of its Free Cash Flow after repayment of lease liabilities
    • Enhanced capital structure: a solid balance sheet expected to support an investment grade credit rating
    • Greater scale in both equity and debt capital markets: access to a wider investor base and to more diversified sources of capital

     Transaction structure, ownership and terms

    • Saipem7 will be created through an EU cross-border statutory merger, carried out by way of absorption of Subsea7 into Saipem, with the latter to be renamed Saipem7
    • Saipem7 will remain incorporated in Italy and headquartered in Milan, and will have its shares listed on both the Milan and Oslo stock exchanges
    • Siem Industries (currently the largest shareholder of Subsea7) will own approximately 11.8% of Saipem7’s share capital, while Eni and CDP Equity (currently the largest shareholders of Saipem) will respectively own approximately 10.6% and 6.4% of Saipem7’s share capital
    • Subsea7 shareholders participating to the Proposed Combination will receive 6.688 new Saipem shares for each Subsea7 share held
    • Assuming all Subsea7 shareholders participate in the merger, the share capital of Saipem7 will be held 50-50% by the current shareholders of Saipem and Subsea7 on completion
    • Immediately prior to completion of the Proposed Combination, Subsea7 shareholders will receive an extraordinary cash dividend of €450 million9
    • Shareholders of Subsea7 who vote against the approval of the Proposed Combination at the Subsea7 Extraordinary General Meeting will have the right to dispose of their shares in Subsea7 for an adequate cash compensation under the conditions set out under Luxembourg company law.10 The formula that will be used to determine the cash compensation will be made available on Subsea7’s website and the amount of the cash compensation determined on the basis of such formula will be announced in advance of Subsea7’s Extraordinary General Meeting

     Key activities performed since the execution of the Memorandum of Understanding

    • Satisfactory confirmatory due diligence completed, and transaction terms finalised in line with those initially agreed at the time of the signing of the Memorandum of Understanding
    • Annual cost and capital expenditure synergies confirmed and expected to be equal to approximately €300 million from the third year after completion of the Proposed Combination
    • No material findings in the analysis of Saipem and Subsea7 business plans in terms of projects overlap, thus further underpinning the value creation deriving from the Proposed Combination
    • Completed the preliminary antitrust analysis with the support of specialised advisors. Currently in the process of submitting the relevant documentation for the consideration of the Proposed Combination to the applicable antitrust authorities
    • Confirmation of capital allocation framework, including shareholders’ remuneration policy and target of achieving and maintaining investment grade credit rating
    • Identified the key members of the management team of Saipem7 and Subsea7 following completion of the Proposed Combination
    • Agreement on the governance principles applicable to Saipem7 and Subsea7 following completion of the Proposed Combination

     Organisational structure of Saipem7

    • Saipem7 will be structured as four businesses: Offshore Engineering & Construction, Onshore Engineering & Construction, Sustainable Infrastructures and Drilling Offshore
    • The Offshore Engineering & Construction business will be contained within an operationally autonomous company, fully owned by Saipem7, named Subsea7, branded as “Subsea7, a Saipem7 Company”, and will comprise all Subsea7’s businesses and the Asset Based Services business of Saipem (including Offshore Wind). The company will represent approximately 84% of the combined group’s EBITDA for the last 12 months as of 31 December 2024
    • Subsea7 shall be incorporated in the UK and headquartered in London. After completion of the Proposed Combination, Subsea7 will be governed by a Board of Directors comprising seven members, including Mr Alessandro Puliti as Chairman, Mr John Evans as CEO, Mr Kristian Siem and other four independent directors

     Pre-completion distributions to shareholders

    • Each of Saipem and Subsea7 will distribute cash dividends of $350 million during the course of 2025, such dividends having already been approved by their respective shareholders’ meetings in May 2025 and having already been partially distributed
    • If the Proposed Combination is not completed before the approval of the full year 2025 results of Saipem and Subsea7 (expected in the second quarter of 2026 for both Saipem and Subsea7), each of Saipem and Subsea7 will (subject to their respective 2025 results meeting certain agreed financial targets) be entitled to distribute cash dividends to their respective shareholders of at least $300 million11,12, 13, to be paid in Q2 2026  
    • In connection with a permitted business divestment currently ongoing, Subsea7 will also distribute a cash dividend equal to €105 million14 to its shareholders prior to completion of the Proposed Combination

    Shareholders’ Agreement

    The Shareholders’ Agreement signed between Siem Industries, Eni and CDP Equity provides for, inter alia, an irrevocable undertaking to vote in favour of the Proposed Combination (subject to receipt of the required Italian government approval), a three-year shareholder lock-up and the submission of a joint slate for the appointment of the majority of the members of the board of directors of Saipem7.

    Timing, conditions precedent, approvals and other matters

    Completion of the Proposed Combination will be subject to customary conditions precedent for a transaction of this nature, including, inter alia, the approval of antitrust, other public and regulatory authorities’ (e.g. the required Italian Government approval), as well as approval by the shareholders of both Saipem and Subsea7 at their respective Extraordinary General Meetings. In the case of Saipem this will be subject to reaching also the so-called “whitewash majorities” for purposes of the mandatory takeover bid exemption15. Both Saipem’s and Subsea7’s Extraordinary General Meetings will take place on 25 September 2025.

    Completion is currently anticipated to occur in the second half of 2026.

    The completion of the Proposed Combination will result in a “Change of Control,” as defined in the terms and conditions of the convertible bond issued by Saipem and denominated “€500,000,000 Senior Unsecured Guaranteed Equity Linked Bonds due 2029”.

    Documentation

    In connection with the Proposed Combination, the following documents, among others, will be made available:

    • The notice of call of each of Saipem and Subsea7’s Extraordinary General Meetings
    • The common merger plan approved by the Boards of Directors of each of Saipem and Subsea7 (the “Common Merger Plan”), along with the consolidated financial statements of Saipem and Subsea7 for the last three financial years and the merger related interim financial statements of Saipem and Subsea7 as of 30 June 2025
    • The reports of the Board of Directors of each of Saipem and Subsea7 describing the Proposed Combination
    • The independent expert reports prepared for each of Saipem and Subsea7 in connection with the Proposed Combination

    These documents will be available at the companies’ registered seats and published on each party’s website. Where required under applicable laws and regulations, these documents will be disclosed also through the authorised storage mechanism (SDIR) for Saipem and through an officially appointed mechanism (OAM) for Subsea7.

    The Common Merger Plan will also be filed with the Companies’ Register of Milan Monza Brianza Lodi, and the Luxembourg Trade and Companies Register, and will also be published in the Recueil Electronique des Sociétés et Associations in Luxembourg (the Luxembourg legal gazette for company announcements) (RESA)16. 

    Advisors

    Goldman Sachs Bank Europe SE, Succursale Italia is acting as lead financial advisor to Saipem, and Deutsche Bank AG, Milan Branch as financial advisor to Saipem. Clifford Chance LLP is serving as global legal counsel to Saipem (including as to matters of Italian, English, US and Luxembourg Law), while Advokatfirmaet Thommessen AS is serving as legal counsel to Saipem as to matters of Norwegian law.

    Kirk Lovegrove & Company Limited is acting as lead financial advisor and Deloitte LLP is acting as financial advisor to Subsea7. Freshfields LLP is serving as global legal counsel to Subsea7 (including as to matters of Italian, US and English Law), while Elvinger Hoss Prussen société anonyme and Advokatfirmaet Wiersholm AS are serving as legal counsel to Subsea7 as to matters of Luxembourg and Norwegian law, respectively.

    Enquiries

    Saipem is a global leader in the engineering and construction of major projects for the energy and infrastructure sectors, both offshore and onshore. Saipem is “One Company” organized into business lines: Asset Based Services, Drilling, Energy Carriers, Offshore Wind, Sustainable Infrastructures, Robotics & Industrialised Solutions. The company has 5 fabrication yards and an offshore fleet of 17 owned construction vessels and 13 drilling rigs, of which 9 owned. Always oriented towards technological innovation, the company’s purpose is “Engineering for a sustainable future”. As such Saipem is committed to supporting its clients on the energy transition pathway towards Net Zero, with increasingly digital means, technologies and processes geared for environmental sustainability. Listed on the Milan Stock Exchange, it is present in more than 50 countries around the world and employs about 30,000 people of over 130 nationalities.

    Subsea7 is a global leader in the delivery of offshore projects and services for the energy industry. Subsea7 makes offshore energy transition possible through the continuous evolution of lower-carbon oil and gas and by enabling the growth of renewables and emerging energies.

    No Offer or Solicitation

    This document is not an offer of merger consideration shares in the United States. Neither the merger consideration shares nor any other securities have been or will be registered under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and neither the merger considerations shares nor any other securities may be offered, sold or delivered within or into the United States, except pursuant to a registration statement filed pursuant to the Securities Act or an applicable exemption from registration or in a transaction otherwise not subject to the Securities Act. This document must not be forwarded, distributed or sent, directly or indirectly, in whole or in part, in or into the United States. This document does not constitute an offer of or an invitation by or on behalf of, Saipem or Subsea7, or any other person, to purchase any securities.

    Forward-looking Statements

    This document contains forward-looking information and statements about Saipem and Subsea7 and their combined business after completion of the proposed merger of Saipem and Subsea 7 (the “Proposed Combination“). Forward-looking statements are statements that are not historical facts. These statements include financial projections and estimates and their underlying assumptions, statements regarding plans, objectives and expectations with respect to future operations, products and services, and statements regarding future performance, Free Cash Flow, EBITDA, dividends, and credit ratings. Forward-looking statements are generally identified by the words “expects,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “intends,” “estimates” and similar expressions. Although the managements of Saipem and Subsea7 believe that the respective expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, investors and holders of Saipem and Subsea7 shares are cautioned that forward-looking information and statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties, many of which are difficult to predict and generally beyond the control of Saipem and Subsea7, respectively, that could cause actual results and developments to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied or projected by, the forward-looking information and statements. Except as required by applicable law, neither Saipem nor Subsea7 undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking information or statements.

    This document includes estimates relating to the synergies expected to arise from the merger and the combination of the business operations of Saipem and Subsea7, as well as related integration costs, which have been prepared by Saipem and Subsea7 and are based on a number of assumptions and judgments. Such estimates present the expected future impact of the merger and the combination of the business operations of Saipem and Subsea7 on Saipem7’s business, financial condition and results of operations. The assumptions relating to the estimated synergies and related integration costs are inherently uncertain and are subject to a wide variety of significant business, economic, and competitive risks and uncertainties that could cause the actual synergies from the merger and the combination of the business operations of Saipem and Subsea7, if any, and related integration costs to differ materially from the estimates in this document. Further, there can be no certainty that the merger will be completed in the manner and timeframe described in this document, or at all.

    Use of Non-IFRS Financial Measures

    This announcement includes certain non-IFRS financial measures with respect to Saipem and Subsea7, including EBITDA and Free Cash Flow. These unaudited non-IFRS financial measures should be considered in addition to, and not as a substitute for, measures of Saipem’s and Subsea7’s financial performance prepared in accordance with IFRS. In addition, these measures may be defined differently than similar terms used by other companies.

    Presentation of Financial Information

    This document includes financial data regarding Saipem and Subsea7 and the combination of Saipem and Subsea7.  Any Saipem7 financial data presented herein is presented for informational purposes only and is not intended to represent or be indicative of the actual consolidated results of operations or financial position of the combined entity and should not be taken as representative of the combined entity’s future consolidated results of operations or financial position had the Proposed Combination occurred as of such date. These estimates are based on financial information available at the time of the preparation of this document.

    1 Merger by way of absorption of Subsea7 into Saipem
    2 Combined Revenue for Saipem and Subsea7 as per last 12 months as of 31 December 2024
    3 Combined EBITDA for Saipem and Subsea7 as per last 12 months as of 31 December 2024
    4 Combined Free Cash Flow post repayment of lease liabilities for Saipem and Subsea7 as per last 12 months as of 31 December 2024
    5 Combined backlog for Saipem and Subsea7 as of 31 March 2025
    6 Combined backlog for Saipem and Subsea7 as of 31 March 2025
    7 Subject to approval by the Shareholders’ Meeting and the Board of Directors of Saipem7
    8 Subject to approval by the Shareholders’ Meeting and the Board of Directors of Saipem7
    9 Subject to approval by the Subsea7 Shareholders’ Meeting
    10 Such withdrawal right may only be exercised in respect of (a) Subsea7 shares registered in the securities account of the relevant shareholder with such shareholder’s financial intermediary on the date of publication of the Common Merger Plan on the Recueil Electronique des Sociétés et Associations – RESA (the Luxembourg legal gazette for company announcements) and (b) Subsea7 shares acquired after such date through inheritance or bequest.  Further details will be specified in the convening notice to the Subsea7 Extraordinary General Meeting
    11 Subject to approval by the Shareholders’ Meeting and the Board of Directors
    12 The dividend paid by Saipem will be qualified as ordinary in nature
    13 Saipem and Subsea7 will be entitled to distribute a reduced pro-rated amount should their respective financial results not meet the relevant financial targets, as detailed in the Common Merger Plan
    14 Subject to approval by the Subsea7 Shareholders’ Meeting
    15 Pursuant to Art. 49, paragraph 1, letter g) of Consob Regulation 11971/99
    16 Subsea7 intends to file the Common Merger Plan with the Registre de Commerce et des Sociétés, Luxembourg (the Luxembourg Trade and Companies Register) for publication on the RESA no later than the second Oslo Børs trading day after the date of this announcement

    This information is considered to be inside information pursuant to the EU Market Abuse Regulation and is subject to the disclosure requirements pursuant to Section 5-12 the Norwegian Securities Trading Act. 
     This stock exchange release was published by Katherine Tonks, Investor Relations, Subsea7, on 24 July 2025 at 00:40 CET.

    Attachment

    The MIL Network –

  • MIL-OSI USA: VIDEO: Senator Peters Advocates for Policies to Support Truck Drivers, Safer Roads in Michigan

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Michigan Gary Peters
    WASHINGTON, DC – During a hearing in the Senate Commerce Subcommittee on Surface Transportation, Freight, Pipelines, and Safety, U.S. Senator Gary Peters (MI) advocated for Michigan’s truck drivers, which make up roughly 1 in 15 jobs throughout the state, according to the Michigan Trucking Association. As Ranking Member of the Subcommittee, Peters delivered opening remarks where he underscored his commitment to ensuring Michigan truck drivers receive the wages and benefits they deserve.
    “Our nation’s truck drivers are the backbone of our economy. These frontline workers spend long hours, often away from their families and at all times of day and night, transporting goods across the country to America’s communities… It’s not an exaggeration to say that the trucking industry touches every American’s daily life,” said Senator Peters, Ranking Member of the Senate Commerce Subcommittee on Surface Transportation, Freight, Pipelines, and Safety. “That’s especially true for Americans who have made trucking their career. There are nearly 250,000 trucking jobs in Michigan alone, making up 1 in 15 jobs throughout my state. From long and short-haul drivers, to mechanics, dispatchers, and logistics coordinators, these jobs provide key economic opportunities for Michiganders, and I am committed to making sure that these jobs live up to their promise for Michiganders by providing fair wages, health care, and retirement benefits. That’s why I am proud to have one of the foremost leaders of that fight here to testify today, Teamsters President Sean O’Brien.”
    During the hearing, Peters also advocated for policies to improve roadway safety to protect both truckers and the drivers they share the road with.
    “Mr. O’Brien and the members of this panel know very well that the single most important factor in the success of our truck drivers and this industry, as well as road users across this country, is safety,” Peters continued. “I believe this committee must prioritize safety in the next surface transportation reauthorization bill for both truckers and those they share the road with, from the deployment of advanced safety technology and driver assistance systems, to investing in safer streets and stronger bridges, to tackling truck parking issues and defending drivers’ access to rest and bathrooms, to addressing freight fraud and theft.”
    Peters also highlighted the current challenges that truck drivers and businesses face as the industry navigates the Trump Administration’s tariff policies.
    “I want to acknowledge that today’s trucking industry, as well as all freight and multimodal industries, is facing an incredibly challenging economic environment with this Administration’s chaotic approach to tariffs. This doesn’t just impact truckers and consumers, changing rules, rising prices, and economic uncertainty impacts the manufacturers that build the trucks that move our goods and keep drivers safe,” said Peters. “In Michigan, the commercial vehicle manufacturing supply chain relies on cross border trade with Canada, and with a global supply chain. Many of these businesses have been forced to consider laying off workers or pausing investments due to a lack of certainty created by constantly shifting tariff policies.”
    “We can and should pursue policies to create commercial trucking manufacturing jobs here at home, but this continued chaos will only serve to harm U.S. manufacturers, consumers, and our intermodal freight system,” Peters continued.

    To watch video of Senator Peters’ opening remarks and question at the hearing, click here.
    Peters has consistently advocated for investments and legislation to support truckers and the trucking industry. In the bipartisan infrastructure law, Peters secured more than $4.6 billion to improve roads, bridges, and highways throughout Michigan, including over $1.8 million for the improvement of the Blue Water Bridge to reduce freight delays and ensure the efficient movement of goods across the bridge via truck. In 2024, Peters’ bipartisan Strengthening the Commercial Driver’s License Information System (CDLIS) Act was signed into law to protect funding for the Commercial Driver’s License Information System (CDLIS), a crucial, nationwide computer system that ensures commercial drivers have only one license and one complete driver record.

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Tuberville Reintroduces Legislation to Bolster Alabama’s Ag Community

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Tommy Tuberville (Alabama)

    WASHINGTON – Today, U.S. Senator Tommy Tuberville (R-AL) reintroduced two pieces of legislation—the Farm Board Act and the Mid-South Oilseed Double Cropping Study Act—to improve opportunities and increase market access for Alabama’s agriculture community. More information about both bills can be found below.

    “Our farmers, foresters, and livestock producers shoulder an enormous burden of keeping America’s food secure,” said Senator Tuberville. “They need to be able to make a living off the land, and they need to have a FCIC Board of Directors that fully reflects their needs. I’m proud to reintroduce legislation that strengthens representation on the FCIC Board, and another piece of legislation that would help solidify a new revenue opportunity for our farmers while also addressing the growing need for renewable diesels and synthetic aviation fuels. As Alabama’s voice on the Senate Ag Committee, I’ll continue fighting to secure opportunities for our ag producers as they feed, fuel, and clothe our country.”

    “I commend Coach on each piece of legislation,” said Alabama Commissioner of Agriculture and Industries Rick Pate. “The Farm Board Act will ensure representation for production agriculture to the FCIC Board of Directors while the Mid-South Oil Seed Bill will help pave the way for another alternative crop for producers to consider growing based on the demand for renewable fuel. I look forward to Coach getting each bill to the finish line.”

    “We appreciate Coach’s continued support of Alabama farmers and his steadfast dedication to supporting innovation while managing risk by increasing availability and oversight of crop insurance programs,” said Alabama Farmers Federation President Jimmy Parnell. “With more offerings than ever for livestock producers, it is important these farmers have representation on the FCIC Board.  Additionally, as farmers are looking at alternative crops to supplement their income, the Mid-South Oilseed Double Cropping Study Act will help to make sure they have the appropriate risk management tools available.”

    ABOUT THE FARM BOARD ACT:

    The Farm Board Act would require the Federal Crop Insurance Corporation (FCIC) Board of Directors to designate one of the four producers on the ten-member board as an individual that produces both livestock and crops. The FCIC is a government owned corporation that finances the Federal Crop Insurance Program’s (FCIP) operations. Making this addition would improve perspective and decisions regarding the newer livestock related crop insurance products that benefit all areas of Alabama’s agriculture industry.  The designated producer seat would not start immediately, but when Board members begin to cycle off on May 1, 2027.

    American Farm Bureau Federation (AFBF), Alabama Farmers Federation (ALFA), Alabama Department of Ag & Industries, and the Alabama Cattlemen’s Association are all supportive of Senator Tuberville’s legislation. More information about the Farm Board Act can be found here.

    ABOUT THE MID-SOUTH OILSEED DOUBLE CROPPING STUDY ACT:

    This bill requests a study from the USDA Risk Management Agency (RMA) on winter oilseed crops, canola, and rapeseed (which is a type of canola) for the Mid-South region—Alabama, Tennessee, and Kentucky. Alabama producers are starting to grow canola as a second crop—following soybeans—and the crop can be used to produce Synthetic Aviation Fuel (SAF), which creates an additional market for our producers. This also enables Alabama farmers to expand revenue opportunities during the winter months and helps reduce nutrient losses in the soil. For farmers to take advantage of opportunities in renewable diesel and SAF, they need the assurance that crop insurance—such as Catastrophic Risk Protection, Yield Protection, Revenue Protection, or Revenue Protection with Harvest Price Exclusion—will be eligible in their counties for these crops and practices. To address crop insurance gaps that may exist, RMA and FCIC need to gather data on the feasibility of producing winter oilseed as a double and rotational crop in the Mid-South region. 

    The diversification of our energy markets by adding new, cost-effective, and sustainable options is necessary. Renewable domestic diesel capacity is slated for aggressive growth with the potential to double by 2030. Additionally, the 106-billion-gallon global commercial jet fuel market is projected to grow to over 230 billion gallons by 2050. The end goal is to get a study now, then down the road have double cropped canola and rapeseed be covered by crop insurance. 

    U.S. Canola Association, National Oilseed Processors Association (NOPA), Alabama Farmers Federation (ALFA), and the Alabama Department of Ag & Industries are all supportive of Senator Tuberville’s legislation. More information about the Mid-South Oilseed Double Cropping Study Act can be found here.

    Senator Tommy Tuberville represents Alabama in the United States Senate and is a member of the Senate Armed Services, Agriculture, Veterans’ Affairs, HELP and Aging Committees.

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Case Introduces Proposal To Expand Indigenous-Based Tourism

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Ed Case (Hawai‘i – District 1)

    (Washington, DC) — U.S. Representative Ed Case (D-Hawai‘i-First District) has introduced proposed legislation in the U.S. House to authorize federal grants to Indian Tribes, Tribal organizations, Native Alaskans and Native Hawaiian organizations for fostering indigenous history and culture-based travel and tourism.

    “This measure is especially important for my home state of Hawai‘i, where the link between tourism and our indigenous peoples, Native Hawaiians, is essential”, said Case. “Native Hawaiian history and culture is at the heart of our islands’ uniqueness. It is one of the major draws for our visitors, and activities based on our indigenous history and culture should be developed by Native Hawaiians wherever and however possible.”

    Case said his measure is the House companion to S. 612, introduced by Senators Lisa Murkowski, Chair of the Senate Indian Affairs Committee, and Brian Schatz, Vice Chairman of the Committee. The bill makes important corrections to the NATIVE Act to authorize grants to Indian Tribes, Tribal organizations, Native Alaskans and Native Hawaiian organizations for recreational travel and tourism activities.

    Case said that Congress enacted the NATIVE Act in 2016 to provide grants, loans and technical assistance to Indian Tribes, Tribal organizations, Native Alaskans and Native Hawaiian organizations to assist in developing tourism in indigenous peoples communities and enhancing opportunities for visitors to learn about indigenous peoples’ history, cultures, traditional foods, languages and arts. He said unfortunately, the act did not clearly authorize the federal Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) or the Office of Native Hawaiian Relations (ONHR) to issue the grants, which led to implementation challenges.

    “Our bill corrects this oversight by clearly authorizing the BIA and ONHR, along with several other federal agencies, to issue these grants and authorize appropriations for the program,” said Case. “The bill will enable improved access to federal resources, helping these communities build sustainable tourism infrastructure and expand cultural tourism. In turn, it will foster a broader appreciation of indigenous peoples and create jobs and boost economic development in rural and underserved areas.”

    Case continued: “The past generations have witnessed a great renaissance of the Hawaiian language and culture, and in turn over the ensuing years Native Hawaiian practitioners and culture have become an increasingly visible and central part of our visitor industry. We in Hawai‘i are committed to fostering this sector of our economy in a way that encourages long-term cultural preservation efforts.

    “Through improving the implementation of the NATIVE Act, which has helped both Native Hawaiian Organizations and local Native Hawaiian businesses, our federal government will do a better job preserving and promoting Native Hawaiian culture.

    “We can help connect tourists with the rich indigenous heritage of Hawai‘i though community-based visitor experiences that protect cultural sites, promote education and create jobs.”

    1.      Link to measure is here

    2.      Link to Case remarks on the measure is here

    ###

     

     

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: West Virginia Higher Education Policy Commission recognizes five leaders for improving educational outcomes for West Virginia students – West Virginia Higher Education Policy Commission

    Source: US State of West Virginia

    Chancellor: Each of these awardees represents the very best of WV’s education system

    Charleston, W.Va. – The West Virginia Higher Education Policy Commission proudly announces the recipients of the 2025 Higher Education Action and Impact Awards, honoring exceptional individuals, schools, and programs that have significantly advanced student success and postsecondary preparation throughout the state.

    “Each of these awardees represents the very best of West Virginia’s education system,” said Dr. Sarah Armstrong Tucker, West Virginia’s Chancellor of Higher Education. “Their innovation, compassion, and dedication are creating pathways for students to achieve their goals and strengthen our state’s future. We are thrilled to recognize their achievements at this year’s Student Success Summit.”

    This year’s honorees demonstrate leadership, innovation, and a deep commitment to improving educational outcomes for West Virginia students. Click here for more information about the West Virginia Higher Education Action and Impact Award.

    Dr. Corley Dennison – Dan Crockett Higher Education Action and Impact Award

    Dr. Dennison is recognized for his longstanding leadership in strengthening higher education in West Virginia. His efforts have included statewide reforms in developmental education, expansion of dual enrollment opportunities, and championing Open Educational Resources that have saved students millions of dollars in college text books and class materials. As Vice Chancellor of Academic Affairs at the West Virginia Higher Education Policy Commission, Interim President at Southern West Virginia Community and Technical College, and a faculty member at Marshall University, Dr. Dennison has consistently prioritized student achievement and academic excellence.

    Buffalo Middle School – Exemplary Middle School Award

    Buffalo Middle School, led by Principal Elizabeth Ryder, has been honored for its outstanding work in helping students envision their futures beyond high school. Through Career Exploration Day, financial literacy simulations, academic enrichment activities, and strong participation in the Heart of Appalachia Talent Search (HATS) Program, the school promotes a robust postsecondary culture that helps students build confidence and career readiness.

    Musselman High School – Exemplary High School Award

    Musselman High School’s strong academic performance and college-going culture earned it recognition as this year’s Exemplary High School. With a graduation rate exceeding 97%, the school combines rigorous coursework, AP and dual credit offerings, and thriving Career and Technical Education programs with personalized counseling and planning. Programs like College 101, SAT prep courses, and scholarship workshops are preparing students for successful transitions after graduation.

    Jamison Lewis – Student Action and Impact Award

    Student leader Jamison Lewis has made a lasting mark at Marshall University through his leadership and initiative. His work on projects such as the Shark Tank Innovation Challenge and TEDxMarshallU and his charitable work with the Marshall Thrift Store highlight his creative approach to improving student life and career readiness. His involvement in campus planning and events has positively shaped the student experience for his peers.

    WVU REACH Program – Institutional Action and Impact Award

    The REACH Program at West Virginia University is honored for its effective support of student success. By offering services such as success coaching, academic assistance, leadership training, and campus engagement opportunities, REACH has helped improve student retention and graduation rates. The program models how institutions can create supportive environments that help students stay on track and achieve their goals.

    This year, awardees were recognized at the 2025 West Virginia Student Success Summit in Charleston.

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Ernst Pushes to Safeguard American Innovation From China

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Joni Ernst (R-IA)

    WASHINGTON – After releasing a bombshell report detailing how critical technology is vulnerable to espionage by the Chinese Communist Party, Senate Small Business and Entrepreneurship Committee Chair Joni Ernst (R-Iowa) detailed why Congress must pass her INNOVATE Act to protect and advance American innovation.
    Ernst laid out how her bill to reauthorize the Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) programs would cut red tape, ensure that funding goes to truly small businesses and startups, and strengthen protections against China’s attempts to steal taxpayer-funded intellectual property.

    Watch Senator Ernst’s full remark here.
    Ernst’s full remarks:
    “Today’s hearing comes at a pivotal moment.
    “America has consistently been at the forefront of technological innovation.
    “Nonetheless, our adversaries — especially China — are working overtime to undermine us.
    “Over the past 100 years, the United States of America has catalyzed the world’s most consequential technology breakthroughs.
    “From putting mankind on the moon, to unlocking a whole new digital frontier, Americans didn’t just invent. We built.
    “We turned those big dreams into real-world breakthroughs, securing a long and prosperous period of economic might and global leadership.
    “But after a century of wins, we cannot become complacent.
    “Over the past 20 years, those in power in Washington have looked the other way as China initiated a comprehensive industrial espionage strategy.
    “They’re not hiding it either. The Chinese Communist Party, through its Made in China 2025 plan, has made crystal clear its goal to eliminate U.S. technological leadership in critical industries.
    “We need to be more clear-eyed, folks. China desires nothing more than to surpass the United States technologically and militarily.
    “They want to impose their authoritarian ideology on the world and destroy the West.
    “If we want any shot at preserving America’s leadership and warfighting capabilities, we have to lock down our innovation pipeline.
    “The truth is, America has left its door wide open, effectively inviting our adversaries to take advantage.
    “As a result, sensitive industries have become vulnerable to exploitation, allowing countries like China to use well-known techniques— including talent recruitment programs— to steal our innovations.
    “The CCP forces innovators across our vibrant startup economy to hand over trade secrets and intellectual property as a cost of doing business.
    “They invest in American firms, not to help, but to scheme, snoop, and steal.
    “The United States Trade Representative and FBI estimate intellectual property theft by China costs our economy between $225-600 billion per year.
    “The Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) programs are no exception.
    “In 2021, the Pentagon first sounded the alarm, revealing the pervasive exploitation of the SBIR program by foreign bad actors and recommended a foreign ties due diligence review process for applicants.
    “That’s why, through the SBIR STTR Extension Act of 2022, I fought to establish a framework to identify the extent of foreign risk, vet each company coming through the doors, and stop awarding awards to malicious actors.
    “It was a strong start, but it isn’t enough. Congress must take further action to secure the critical technologies being cultivated in these programs.
    “In fact, my recent report on this subject showed that 64 percent of applications flagged for foreign risk were still eligible to receive taxpayer dollars. That’s unacceptable. I ask unanimous consent to enter this report into the record.
    “We cannot afford to keep investing taxpayer dollars to develop and deploy our best homegrown technologies, while failing to safeguard them against theft by our adversaries.
    “This is why earlier this year I introduced the INNOVATE Act.
    “It would tighten our defenses, standardizing foreign ties due diligence in SBIR across participating agencies and giving agencies more muscle to claw back award dollars when our national security is threatened. It’s just common sense.
    “Let me be clear, this is only a first step. The disturbing reality is that China is already conducting economic warfare in our homeland by targeting our farmland and critical infrastructure.
    “If we want to win the next century and beyond, we must protect our innovators, our intellectual property, and the technologies that will shape our future.
    “I am looking forward to hearing from our expert witnesses today on the scale of these threats and response measures for Congress to consider.”

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Sullivan Chairs CECC Hearing on Chinese Transnational Repression & Political Warfare

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Alaska Dan Sullivan

    07.23.25

    WASHINGTON—U.S. Senator Dan Sullivan (R-Alaska), the new chair of the Congressional-Executive Commission on China (CECC), today chaired a hearing on the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) disturbing campaign of transnational political warfare and repression against the people and leaders of Taiwan, and partners of and advocates for Taiwan, including American citizens and others living lawfully in the United States.

    “This is transnational repression. It is a coordinated strategy to isolate Taiwan, dominate the global narrative through fear and coercion, and again, not only against Taiwanese citizens, but other citizens, including our own citizens,” said Sen Sullivan. “These threats are multifaceted—AI-generated disinformation; the extraterritorial application of PRC laws; of course, diplomatic pressure on Taiwan’s allies; the public intimidation of democratically elected leaders…Every day, the CCP grows bolder and more aggressive in its threats against Taiwan, the United States and our allies in the Indo-Pacific. We need to call that out, have open hearings like this, and push back against this transnational repression.”

    [embedded content]

    Click here to watch the full hearing.

    The commission heard testimony from Fan Yun, a member of the Legislative Yuan of Taiwan; Rear Admiral Mike Studeman, U.S. Navy (Ret.), former commander of the Office of Naval Intelligence; Peter Mattis, president of the Jamestown Foundation; and Audrye Wong, the Jeane Kirkpatrick Fellow at the American Enterprise Institute and assistant professor of political science and international relations at the University of Southern California.

    Sen. Sullivan has long been a leading advocate in the Senate for Taiwan, introducing his comprehensive Sanctions Targeting Aggressors of Neighboring Democracies (STAND) with Taiwan Act in the last two Congresses aimed at deterring a Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) military invasion of Taiwan that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) dictatorship has threatened for years. Sullivan is expected to reintroduce the legislation in the fall with a strong, bipartisan slate of cosponsors. Sen. Sullivan was announced as the chairman of the CECC for the 119th Congress on July 14, 2025, serving alongside Rep. Chris Smith (R-N.J.), the CECC co-chair.

    Below is a full transcript of Sen. Sullivan’s introductory remarks.

    Today’s hearing comes at a pivotal moment. For 75 years, the People’s Republic of China has vowed to bring Taiwan under its control. We have our own Taiwan Relations Act. We have our “One China” policy. However, in recent years, that pressure—not just, by the way, with regard to Taiwanese, but other people, including American citizens—has intensified and globalized with Beijing not only targeting Taiwan across the strait, it’s projecting intimidation across borders, institutions, using political transnational repression as tools of coercion among people across the globe.

    The title of this hearing rhymes with major legislation of mine, the STAND with Taiwan Act. That bill, which I’ve introduced in the last two Congresses and will soon be introducing again, has great bipartisan support. Senators Graham, Duckworth and Coons are the top co-sponsors. I would encourage strong bipartisan support with my colleagues here. What that would do is, if there is a military invasion of Taiwan by the Communist Party and the PLA of China, this would trigger punishing, comprehensive sanctions on the Chinese economy and particularly leaders of the Chinese Communist Party—punishing—economic, trade, financial, energy. We all want deterrence in the Taiwan Strait. I think the threat of these massive sanctions might be critical in terms of deterring a cross-Strait invasion of Taiwan by the PLA.

    We also need to deal with the here and now of Chinese coercion abroad. Again, this hearing is going to focus on the coercion of Taiwanese citizens. But I want to make sure, and I certainly will be asking questions in my Q-and-A with the witnesses of repression of others—people from Hong Kong, American citizens, which is really unacceptable when that happens by the Chinese Communist Party. They’re good at coercing their own citizens, but they’re not going to, with this Congress, be allowed to coerce Americans or those who are our allies.

    These threats are multifaceted—AI-generated disinformation; the extraterritorial application of PRC laws; of course, diplomatic pressure on Taiwan’s allies; the public intimidation of democratically elected leaders. By the way, that’s something the Chinese Communist Party would never do. They never stand for election themselves. They fear their own people because they know they probably wouldn’t get elected if they had to stand for elections. So that makes them nervous when there are people who actually stand for elections, like we do, and go before the people.

    The PRC is also attempting to rewrite international norms, distorting UN General Assembly Resolution 2758, and pressuring countries to embrace Beijing’s view that all necessary measures it might use to achieve unification with regard to Taiwan.

    Most disturbingly, the PRC has labeled Taiwan’s vice president, who I know well and is a good friend of mine, and other officials as “obstinate Taiwan independence diehards,” threatening them with life imprisonment or worse. It has declared any Taiwanese citizen, including those living abroad, can be punished under PRC law.

    In a closed-door meeting earlier this year, senior CCP official Wang Huning reportedly called for a global expansion of these intimidation tactics. According to credible reporting, Wang instructed embassies and security services—hopefully they’re not doing it here in America, but they probably are—to implement “proactive intimidation against so-called radical Taiwanese independence advocates worldwide, including in the United States of America.

    These are not abstract threats last year, Czech intelligence uncovered a planned “kinetic operation” by the PRC to intimidate then Vice President-elect Bi-khim on her visit there. Again, she’s a friend of mine—a great person. The PRC is also harassing international media outlets for interviewing Taiwanese leaders. Individuals around the world who criticize Beijing’s Taiwan policy have been doxed and placed under surveillance. This is transnational repression. It is a coordinated strategy to isolate Taiwan, dominate the global narrative through fear and coercion, and again, not only against Taiwanese citizens, but other citizens, including our own citizens.

    Every day, the CCP grows bolder and more aggressive in its threats against Taiwan, the United States and our allies in the Indo-Pacific. We need to call that out, have open hearings like this, and push back against this transnational repression.

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: US Department of Labor applauds President Trump’s ‘AI Action Plan’ to achieve global dominance in artificial intelligence

    Source: US Department of Labor

    WASHINGTON – U.S. Secretary of Labor Lori Chavez-DeRemer and Deputy Secretary of Labor Keith Sonderling today praised the release of President Trump’s artificial intelligence policy strategy, “Winning the Race: America’s AI Action Plan.”Developed in response to the President’s January Executive Order “Removing Barriers to American Leadership in Artificial Intelligence,” the AI Action Plan sets a clear policy roadmap of the specific actions needed to help the U.S. achieve global AI dominance. The plan illustrates how American workers will be central to the Trump Administration’s AI policy and includes two areas outlining the Labor Department’s integral role in creating a future-ready workforce: “Empower American Workers in the Age of AI” and “Train a Skilled Workforce for AI Infrastructure.”“Since day one, President Trump has made it his top priority to put American Workers First by expanding opportunity and ensuring all are prepared for the challenges of the future,” said Secretary Chavez-DeRemer. “By boosting AI literacy and investing in skills training, we’re equipping hardworking Americans with the tools they need to lead and succeed in this new era. The Department of Labor is proud to help deliver on the President’s vision for global AI dominance by building a stronger, more resilient American workforce.”“The AI Action Plan demonstrates President Trump’s bold leadership in driving forward a worker-centric AI strategy that will create a new era of economic prosperity for American workers,” said Deputy Secretary Sonderling. “The Department of Labor looks forward to executing the critical AI Action Plan efforts that will support our workforce, including expanding AI literacy nationwide, creating a new hub to analyze AI’s impact on the labor market, and piloting innovative models to help workers succeed in an AI-driven economy.”The “Empower American Workers in the Age of AI” initiative includes proposed actions for the Department of Labor, in collaboration with other federal agencies, to:Prioritize AI skills development as a core objective of education and workforce funding streams, including career and technical education, apprenticeships, and other federally supported skills initiatives.Establish the AI Workforce Research Hub to lead a sustained federal effort to evaluate AI’s impact on the labor market and the American worker, including recurring analysis, scenario planning, and actionable insights for workforce and education policy.Study AI’s impact on the labor market by providing the AI Workforce Research Hub with analysis to support tracking of AI adoption, job creation, displacement, and wage effects.Fund rapid retraining for individuals impacted by AI-related job displacement, as well as issue guidance clarifying how funds can be used to proactively upskill workers at risk of future displacement.Pilot new approaches to meet workforce challenges created by AI, which may include areas such as rapid retraining models to respond to labor market shifts and new models to support pathways into entry-level roles.The “Train a Skilled Workforce for AI Infrastructure” initiative includes proposed actions for the Department of Labor, in collaboration with other federal agencies, to:Create a national initiative identifying high-priority occupations critical to AI infrastructure.Partner with state and local governments and workforce system stakeholders to support the creation of industry-driven training programs for priority AI infrastructure occupations.Partner with education and workforce system stakeholders to expand early career exposure programs and pre-apprenticeship opportunities for middle and high school students in AI infrastructure occupations.Expand Registered Apprenticeships for occupations critical to AI infrastructure.Learn more about President Trump’s AI Action Plan. 

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Statement on the Commission’s Status Report in the Climate-Related Disclosure Rules Litigation

    Source: Securities and Exchange Commission

    On April 24, 2025—three months ago—the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit directed the Commission to provide a status update in the ongoing litigation concerning the Climate-Related Disclosure Rules, which the Commission adopted in March of 2024.[1]

    The Court “directed” the Commission to advise whether it “intends to review or reconsider the [R]ules at issue in this case.”[2] And, if the Commission has determined to take no action, the Court ordered the Commission to explain whether it “will adhere to the [R]ules if the petitions for review are denied and, if not, why it will not review or reconsider the [R]ules at this time.”[3]

    The Court’s directive was straightforward; our answer is not.

    The Commission’s Status Report, filed today, states plainly enough that it has no intention of revisiting the Rules at this time.[4] That, however, is where our responsiveness ends.[5] The Status Report goes on to argue that we cannot expound on what the Commission’s future plans might be in the event the rulemaking petitions are denied, because we would be “prejudging” those policy decisions.[6] And, the Status Report explains, any future rulemaking should benefit from a court ruling on our statutory authority.[7]

    We also weigh in on a number of questions that the Court did not ask of us – for example, we opine that there are “no obstacle[s]” to reaching the merits of the case and that a “live controversy” remains.[8]

    This purported response is wholly unresponsive.

    The Court asked us in no uncertain terms “will [the Commission] adhere to the [R]ules if the petitions for review are denied[?]” We did not—but should have—answered that question. The unspoken truth under this Commission is that the answer is “no.” Three of the four current Commissioners have been vocal critics of the Rules.[9] They have also withdrawn the Commission from the defense of the Rules in litigation.[10] The Commission simply does not want to say what we all know to be true by now—it has no intention of allowing the Climate-Related Disclosure Rules to go into effect.

    Once we acknowledge this answer, the rest of the Commission’s arguments fall away. There are no prejudgment issues, because there is nothing to prejudge. And, we do not need the Court to rule on our statutory authority for the Commission to engage in rulemaking. If there is future rulemaking in this space—whether to rescind the Rules or otherwise – that rulemaking may present different legal issues. Whatever those issues may be, and whomever those aggrieved parties may be, they are not now before the Court. Federal courts are not in the business of giving advisory opinions to agencies.

    What is crystal clear, however, is that this Commission is seeking to avoid its legal obligations under the guise of conserving “Commission time and resources.” No matter what, this comes at the expense of judicial resources. As I wrote previously in connection with the Commission’s decision to stop defending these Rules,[11] the Administrative Procedure Act governs the process by which we make and repeal rules. It includes a prescriptive framework for promulgation and rescission. If this Commission wants to rescind, repeal or modify the Rules, which were promulgated by-the-book, then it must do the statutorily-required work. It cannot take the easy way out. It must engage in notice-and-comment rulemaking, with the benefit of economic analysis and a public, transparent process, even if inconvenient or if the Commission has other, more pressing priorities.[12] Indeed, other Commissioners have acknowledged that doing the work required to rescind the rule would be a difficult lift.[13] So, instead, we once again ask the Court to do the work for us. By asking the Court to carry water that we should shoulder ourselves, we do a grave disservice to our already taxed judicial system. This is not good governance.

    The Commission has effectively ignored the Court’s order and thrown the ball back at the Court. The Court should decline to play these games.

    [2] Status Update Order.

    [4] Status Report of the Securities and Exchange Commission in Response to the Court’s April 24, 2025 Order, State of Iowa v. Securities and Exchange Commission, 24-cv-1522 (8th Cir. July 23, 2025) (“Status Report”) at 2 (“The Commission does not intend to review or reconsider the Rules at this time.”).

    [5] These viewpoints do not reflect upon the efforts of the staff in our Office of the General Counsel.

    [6] Status Report at 2.

    [7] Id. at 2, 4, 5.

    [8] Id. at 2, 3.

    [10] See Status Report filed by SEC, State of Iowa v. Securities and Exchange Commission, 24-cv-1522 (8th Cir. Mar. 27, 2025); SEC Press Release No. 2025-58, SEC Votes to End Defense of Climate Disclosure Rules (Mar. 27, 2025) (According to then-Acting Chair Uyeda, “The goal of today’s Commission action and notification to the court is to cease the Commission’s involvement in the defense of the costly and unnecessarily intrusive climate change disclosure rules.”).

    [12] Commissioner Mark T. Uyeda, Remarks at the “SEC Speaks” Conference 2025 (May 19, 2025) (“For the Commission to rescind the climate-related disclosure rule—and address the countless factual findings discussed in that 885-page release—would place a significant strain on the Commission’s resources. This effort would be a difficult lift, and it would potentially take away staff resources needed to advance the regulatory regime with respect to crypto and capital formation.”).

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Senators Scott, Crapo, Colleagues Reintroduce Legislation to Improve IRS Accountability

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for South Carolina Tim Scott

    U.S. Senator Tim Scott (R-S.C.), Senate Finance Committee Chairman Mike Crapo (R-Idaho), and their Republican colleagues, reintroduced the IRS Accountability and Taxpayer Protection Act to modify rules for imposing tax penalties on Americans. This bill would require a supervisor or higher-level official to approve or deny penalties during the pre-assessment process. Establishing a supervisor sign-off requirement will improve transparency and accountability at the IRS to make sure that taxpayers are not given improper or automated penalties.

    “IRS agents should seek proper approval before issuing penalties to American taxpayers,” said Sen. Scott. “I’m reintroducing the IRS Accountability and Taxpayer Protection Act to implement reforms that put the taxpayer first and supports good governance. This bill ensures no penalty can be imposed without written approval from a supervisor, bringing greater transparency and accountability to the process. American taxpayers deserve a fair system that protects their rights—not one that punishes them without oversight.”

    “Senator Scott deserves the gratitude of millions of Americans for reintroducing legislation to strengthen this vital taxpayer safeguard against unauthorized penalties. Congress affirmed the IRS’s penalty authority must be balanced with the rights of taxpayers in the bipartisan IRS Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998. That provision has come under attack in recent years, endangering the hard-won protections that Americans depend upon in legitimate disputes with the IRS. The IRS Accountability and Taxpayer Protection Act gives hope to taxpayers who follow the rules that the IRS will do the same. We are proud to support Senator Scott’s bill. Lawmakers in both parties should do so too,” said Pete Sepp, president of the National Taxpayers Union.

    “Democrats super-sized the IRS to ramp up audits on small businesses and households. They attempted to strip away section 6751(b) of the tax code, a provision that prevents IRS agents from supervisor shopping for a rubber stamp to shake down taxpayers. Scott’s bill ensures the IRS can’t intimidate taxpayers into settling by threatening unjust penalties. Taxpayers need more protection from the IRS, not less. Every lawmaker should support Sen. Scott’s bill and I applaud his leadership,” said Grover Norquist, president of Americans for Tax Reform.

    In addition to U.S. Senators Scott and Crapo, the IRS Accountability and Taxpayer Protection Act is cosponsored by Senators Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.), Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), and Jim Risch (R-Idaho).

    Full text of the IRS Accountability and Taxpayer Protection Act can be found here.

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Senator Scott Applauds $25 Million Grant for Dorchester County Corridor

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for South Carolina Tim Scott

    WASHINGTON — U.S. Senator Tim Scott (R-S.C.) issued the following statement on the Better Utilizing Investments to Leverage Development (BUILD) grant that he advocated for review and the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) approved. This nearly $25 million grant for U.S. Highway 78 Phase 3A was the only grant awarded in South Carolina in Round 2 of 2025 BUILD grant funds.

    “This BUILD grant is a vital investment in the safety of Dorchester’s residents and its future, and I look forward to seeing the development of this project that will improve safety for residents and overall corridor efficiency,” said Senator Scott. “The U.S. Highway 78 corridor has been a transportation priority for South Carolina for years, and this funding will deliver real, day-to-day improvements for the community.”

    Sen. Scott wrote a letter to the DOT in support of the BUILD grant to address safety concerns and congestions levels along the corridor in Dorchester County.

    This infrastructure investment is designed to improve traffic flow, expand transportation options, and enhance overall mobility and connectivity throughout the corridor, delivering substantial benefits to residents and commuters.

    Background:

    The U.S. 78 Phase 3A project will transform a critical transportation corridor by widening the highway from west of Orangeburg Road to North Maple Street in Dorchester County, South Carolina. The expansion will convert the existing two-lane roadway into a five-lane configuration featuring:

    • 12-foot-wide travel lanes 
    • 15-foot-wide center turn lane 
    • Approximately 3.39 miles of new sidewalks 
    • Approximately 4.9 miles of bicycle lanes 
    • Approximately 0.41 miles of multi-use path 
    • Upgraded intersections with dedicated turn lanes and concrete medians 
    • Replacement of the Rumphs Hill Creek culvert 
    • Installation of curb and gutter systems along the corridor 

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Luján Fights for National Lab Science Funding, Presses Trump Administration to Protect America’s Scientific Innovation and Reverse Course on Cuts to Research and Development Programs

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Ben Ray Luján (D-New Mexico)

    Washington, D.C. – Today, U.S. Senator Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.), Co-Chair of the Senate National Labs Caucus, called on President Trump to reverse course on proposed reductions in the Fiscal Year 2026 federal budget to research and development programs within the Department of Energy (DOE), including cuts to programs at National Laboratories. In the letter to President Trump, Senator Luján highlights the successful economic impacts by these DOE research and development programs, including our National Laboratories’ critical role in driving global scientific leadership.

    Senator Luján wrote, “These proposed changes jeopardize not only our nation’s economic competitiveness but also our national security, energy independence, and capacity for innovation. Slashes to these programs undermine the core principles and opportunities that America promises its citizens: through bold investment in knowledge and innovation, we build a stronger, safer, and more just future.”

    “Without adequate support, the United States risks ceding leadership in emerging industries to nations with more consistent and centralized science investment strategies. Slashing funding to these programs is not fiscal responsibility – it is strategic negligence,” continued Senator Luján.

    “As a proud and steadfast champion of the groundbreaking innovation coming out of the national labs in my state, I’m constantly reminded of their extraordinary contributions,” concluded Senator Luján.

    The full text of the letter is available here and below:

    Dear President Trump:

    I am writing to express my deep concern regarding the proposed reductions in the Fiscal Year 2026 federal budget to research and development programs within the Department of Energy (DOE), including significant cuts to the Office of Science, the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), and the Advanced Research Projects Agency – Energy (ARPA–E). These proposed changes jeopardize not only our nation’s economic competitiveness but also our national security, energy independence, and capacity for innovation. Slashes to these programs undermine the core principles and opportunities that America promises its citizens: through bold investment in knowledge and innovation, we build a stronger, safer, and more just future.

    The national laboratories are not just the Department of Energy’s research hubs; they are engines of economic empowerment. These nearly 80,000 scientists, engineers, and staff are at the forefront of pioneering technologies in advanced energy systems, life-saving medical isotopes, next-generation manufacturing, and national defense. The proposed 14% reduction to the Office of Science and 74% cut to EERE will have an immediate and destabilizing impact – threatening the continuation of critical research programs, leading to the loss of thousands of skilled jobs. Investments in science ARE investments in American leadership.

    Specifically, EERE has been responsible for more than $624 billion in net economic benefits, heavily contributing to U.S. energy bill reductions of over $800 billion since 1980. These cuts will impede 100s of ongoing lab-based projects in clean energy, grid modernization, and industrial decarbonization, while endangering 1,000s of jobs across multiple national laboratories, and undermine a network that has historically returned over $10 in economic output for every dollar of federal R&D investment. We don’t just silence the potential for future discoveries that could deliver heat and power to every corner of the country, we squander the ingenuity of the very Americans who have the knowledge and drive to make it happen.

    Similarly, proposed budget reductions would scale back fellowships, internships, and research grants that support tens of thousands of graduate and postdoctoral researchers. Around half of STEM graduate students rely on federal support to complete their training. The elimination of these opportunities would be devastating to early-career researchers and erode our long-term competitiveness, particularly in fields like quantum, biotechnology, and energy.

    For decades, DOE’s national laboratories have played a critical role in translating federal research into commercial success. The DOE national labs outperform other agencies in innovation productivity, producing 3.5x more patents per dollar and 1.4x higher licensing rate per patent than the federal agency average. Every year the labs execute 1000s of partnership agreements, including 100s of agreements to commercialize technology. These efforts are part of a larger ecosystem that has enabled the United States to maintain global leadership in critical technologies such as artificial intelligence, biotechnology, advanced computing, and energy efficiency. This innovation culture, rooted in federally funded basic and applied science, has given the United States a durable advantage over strategic competitors, including China, whose state-led investments are rapidly closing the gap.

    Programs like ARPA-E, which the budget proposes to cut by 57%, have been instrumental in maintaining this leadership. The agency has funded over 1,000 high-risk projects, resulted in over 700 patents, and attracted over $12 billion in follow-on private investment. Reducing federal investments in ARPA-E and DOE lab commercialization programs could shift the global balance of innovation. Without adequate support, the United States risks ceding leadership in emerging industries to nations with more consistent and centralized science investment strategies. Slashing funding to these programs is not fiscal responsibility – it is strategic negligence.

    The United States did not become a global leader in science and technology by retreating from bold investment. We became that leader by making deliberate, courageous decisions to fund basic and applied research, to believe in our academic institutions, and to empower our national laboratories as centers of excellence. At a time when other nations are dramatically increasing their R&D investments, it would be short-sighted and strategically dangerous for the United States to step back.

    As a proud and steadfast champion of the groundbreaking innovation coming out of the national labs in my state, I’m constantly reminded of their extraordinary contributions. At Sandia National Laboratories, researchers invented clean rooms, a technology essential to manufacturing microchips that power high performance computing and artificial intelligence, while also revolutionizing hospital operating room safety. Sandia isn’t just refining the economics of LED light bulbs, they’re re-engineering light itself to promote human health and increase agricultural yields. At Los Alamos, during the Human Genome Project, scientists developed GenBank, the genetic sequence database that has become indispensable to modern drug discovery and our understanding of disease. Los Alamos also remains one of the nation’s only sources of critical medical isotopes used in targeted cancer therapies – treatments that can destroy breast cancer cells while sparing healthy tissue. Slashing funding to these transformative institutions isn’t just short-sighted – it’s an assault on the standard of living, health, and opportunity for every American.

    America’s scientific capacity is one of its most valuable assets. We must treat it accordingly – with care, with vision, and with the full weight of federal support. I respectfully urge you to reconsider these reductions and restore full funding for DOE research and innovation programs – including ARPA-E, EERE, the Office of Science, the associated workforce, and their commercialization initiatives.

    Thank you for your consideration and commitment to the future of American science, security, and prosperity.

    Sincerely,

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: DelBene, Clarke Introduce Bill to Boost Smart City Tech

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congresswoman Suzan DelBene (1st District of Washington)

    Today, Congresswomen Suzan DelBene (WA-01) and Yvette Clarke (NY-09) introduced the Smart Cities and Communities Act, legislation that would expand smart city technologies and improve federal coordination of these programs.

    Smart technologies help improve community safety, mobility, and resilience against natural disasters, while also expanding communication and public services in large cities and small towns alike. These innovations help cities cut costs, alleviate traffic congestion, reduce air pollution, and lower energy use, all while generating economic growth and expanding opportunities for communities of all sizes.

    With an estimated $1.4 trillion expected to be invested globally in smart technology over the next five years, U.S. cities must catch up. Research shows that every dollar spent on government technology can save nearly $4. Despite these clear benefits, the U.S. is currently lagging in smart city development.

    This technology is already making an impact in cities across the nation, including Washington. In Redmond, it is being deployed to improve traffic flow and management. This system helps detect pedestrians in crosswalks, adjusts light timings for safer crossing, and modifies traffic signals based on real-time volumes to reduce congestion and make our intersections safer and less stressful for roadway users. In Bellevue, the city has a Smart Mobility Plan to help the city plan for shared-use mobility, autonomous vehicles, electric vehicles, and data management.

    The Smart Cities and Communities Act would:

    • Enhance federal coordination of smart city programs, including improved reporting and demonstration of the value and utility of smart city systems.
    • Provide assistance and resources to local governments interested in implementing smart city technologies, making them more accessible in suburban and rural areas.
    • Develop a skilled domestic workforce to support smart cities.
    • Improve the quality and performance of smart city technologies while assessing and enhancing cybersecurity and privacy protections. 
    • Foster international collaboration and trade in smart city technologies.

    “Investing in smart city technology will propel our nation into a bright future, powered by more livable communities,” said DelBene. “The Smart Cities and Communities Act allows local governments to equip themselves with the cutting-edge tools to increase connectivity and develop green infrastructure. This important development will strengthen the middle class by generating good jobs and cutting pollution, ensuring the United States maintains its position as a global leader in innovation.”

    “Ensuring our communities are equipped with the smart city technologies they need to be cleaner, safer, and more resilient to the changing climate must be among Congress’ highest priorities,” said Clarke. “In the face of the worsening climate crisis, we have a responsibility to provide every American with equitable access to the innovations that will protect them from whatever an uncertain future might bring. I am proud to stand alongside my colleague, Congresswoman Suzan DelBene, to introduce this forward-looking legislation that will position the United States as a leader in the global movement towards climate resilience and facilitate the critical upgrades our communities are depending on Congress to deliver.”

    “BSA commends Representatives DelBene and Clarke for reintroducing the Smart Cities and Communities Act, which recognizes the potential of artificial intelligence and emerging technologies to transform local communities. By encouraging adoption of and investments in AI-driven solutions, and supporting robust AI training and data utilization, this legislation will help communities realize smart city benefits that are efficient, cost-effective, and enhance public services,” said Craig Albright, SVP of US Government Relations, Business Software Alliance.

    The full text of the legislation can be found here.

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: HHS, FDA and USDA Address the Health Risks of Ultra-Processed Foods

    Source: US Department of Health and Human Services – 3

    For Immediate Release:
    July 23, 2025

    Under the leadership of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the U.S. Department of Agriculture Secretary Brooke L. Rollins, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and U.S. Department of Agriculture are accelerating federal efforts to address the growing concerns around ultra-processed foods and the current epidemic of diet-related chronic disease that is plaguing America. The agencies are announcing a joint Request for Information (RFI) to gather information and data to help establish a federally recognized uniform definition for ultra-processed foods—a critical step in providing increased transparency to consumers about the foods they eat.
    “Ultra-processed foods are driving our chronic disease epidemic,” said HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. “We must act boldly to eliminate the root causes of chronic illness and improve the health of our food supply. Defining ultra-processed foods with a clear, uniform standard will empower us even more to Make America Healthy Again.”
    Currently, there is no single authoritative definition for ultra-processed foods for the U.S. food supply. Creating a uniform federal definition will serve as a key deliverable on the heels of the recently published Make Our Children Healthy Again Assessment, which recognizes that the overconsumption of ultra-processed foods is one of the driving factors of the childhood chronic disease crisis.
    “President Trump has made it a priority to improve health outcomes for American families and communities. And this Request for Information is yet another step in seeking commonsense ways to foster improved and more informed consumer choice. A unified, widely understood definition for ultra processed foods is long overdue and I look forward to continued partnership with Secretary Kennedy to Make America Healthy Again. As this process unfolds, I will make certain the great men and women of the agriculture value chain are part of the conversation,” said U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Brooke L. Rollins.
    “I am delighted to lead this critical effort at the FDA,” said FDA Commissioner Marty Makary, M.D., M.P.H. “The threats posed to our health by foods often considered ultra-processed are clear and convincing, making it imperative that we work in lockstep with our federal partners to advance, for the first time ever, a uniform definition of ultra-processed foods.”
    It is estimated that approximately 70% of packaged products in the U.S. food supply are foods often considered ultra-processed, and that children get over 60% of their calories from such foods. Dozens of scientific studies have found links between the consumption of foods often considered ultra-processed with numerous adverse health outcomes, including cardiovascular disease, Type 2 diabetes, cancer, obesity and neurological disorders. Helping to address overconsumption of ultra-processed foods is a key element to Make America Healthy Again.
    A uniform definition of ultra-processed foods will allow for consistency in research and policy to pave the way for addressing health concerns associated with the consumption of ultra-processed foods. The RFI will be publicly available in the federal register on July 24 and seeks information on what factors and criteria should be included in a definition of ultra-processed foods.
    Alongside developing a uniform definition, the FDA and National Institutes of Health are investing in high-quality research to help answer remaining questions about the health impacts of ultra-processed foods through its recently announced Nutrition Regulatory Science Program. The Department will also continue to pursue developing and implementing other key policies and programs that seek to, collectively, dramatically reduce chronic disease and help ensure a healthy future for our nation.

    Consumer:888-INFO-FDA

    ###

    Boilerplate

    The FDA, an agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, protects the public health by assuring the safety, effectiveness, and security of human and veterinary drugs, vaccines and other biological products for human use, and medical devices. The agency also is responsible for the safety and security of our nation’s food supply, cosmetics, dietary supplements, radiation-emitting electronic products, and for regulating tobacco products.

    Content current as of:
    07/23/2025

    Regulated Product(s)

    Follow FDA

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Statement on Commencement of Appointment Process for Five Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Seats

    Source: Securities and Exchange Commission

    On behalf of the Securities and Exchange Commission, I am soliciting candidates for all five Board positions, including the Chairperson, of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (the “PCAOB” or “Board”). The PCAOB was established by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the “Act”) and oversees the audits of the financial statements of public companies, brokers, and dealers through registration, standard setting, inspection, and disciplinary programs. Under the Act, the Securities and Exchange Commission selects members and the Chairperson of the Board.

    The Act requires that PCAOB Board members be “appointed from among prominent individuals of integrity and reputation who have a demonstrated commitment to the interests of investors and the public, and an understanding of the responsibilities for and nature of the financial disclosures required of issuers under the securities laws and the obligations of accountants with respect to the preparation and issuance of audit reports with respect to such disclosures.”

    Each Board seat is associated with a set five-year term; any nominee selected by the Commission to fill a seat will serve for the remainder of the term associated with that seat. If eligible, the Commission may reappoint such person to a second, full term. Any Board member, including the Chairperson, may be appointed to any seat. The Chairperson’s seat may be filled by either a CPA or a non-CPA, though any member who is a CPA is eligible to serve as Chairperson only if that individual has not been a practicing CPA for five years preceding possible appointment as Chairperson.

    The five seats have terms that expire on the following dates:

    1. October 24, 2026.
    2. October 24, 2027.
    3. October 24, 2028.
    4. October 24, 2029.
    5. October 24, 2030.[1]

    I strongly encourage applications from candidates interested in furthering the public interest through the efficient stewardship of PCAOB resources.  PCAOB Board members play an important role in serving the public interest by helping to protect the integrity of public markets in a manner that minimizes unnecessary costs for the public companies, brokers, and dealers who ultimately fund the PCAOB’s budget. In that regard, I note that over the last several years, the PCAOB’s annual budget has increased at a rate significantly faster than that of the Commission. This increase took place over a period in which the Board’s mission did not change materially. Under the Act, the Board’s budget is subject to Commission approval. The Commission’s review of the PCAOB’s annual budget is an important element of the Commission’s oversight of the Board, and I expect that an evaluation of Board member compensation will be among the items the Commission considers in connection with its review of the Board’s 2026 budget.

    The PCAOB Board member selection process is administered by the SEC’s Office of the Chief Accountant. Individuals who meet the statutory criteria and are interested in being considered for a position as Board member of the PCAOB should submit (1) a cover letter, discussing the statutory qualifications summarized above and described more completely in the Act; and (2) a current résumé or curriculum vitae to Boardrecommendations@sec.gov, on or by August 25, 2025.

    [1] The candidate selected for this seat will be appointed to serve two consecutive terms, with the first expiring on October 24, 2025 and the second expiring on October 24, 2030.

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Miller-Meeks Introduces Bill to Rename Fort Madison Post Office in Honor of Martin L. Graber

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Representative Mariannette Miller-Meeks’ (IA-02)

    Washington, D.C. – Today, Congresswoman Mariannette Miller-Meeks (IA-01) introduced legislation to rename the U.S. Post Office located at 1019 Avenue H in Fort Madison, Iowa, as the “Martin L. Graber Post Office.” The bill honors the life and legacy of the late Iowa State Representative Martin Graber, a dedicated public servant, 32-year Iowa Army National Guard veteran, and beloved leader in southeast Iowa.

    Joining Miller-Meeks in leading this bill are Iowa Representatives Ashley Hinson (IA-02) and Randy Feenstra (IA-04).

    “Martin Graber embodied the very best of Iowa: faith, family, and service. He was a patriot, a leader, and a constant source of strength for Fort Madison and all of southeast Iowa,” said Rep. Miller-Meeks. “Naming this post office in his honor ensures his legacy of service and sacrifice lives on. I’m deeply proud to lead this effort to recognize a man who gave so much to his community and his country.”

    “I am so proud to support legislation renaming the Fort Madison Post Office after the late Iowa State Representative Martin Graber,” said Rep. Ashley Hinson. “His life epitomized patriotism, courage, and self-sacrifice, and I am grateful for his dedicated service to Iowans for so many years. This landmark will forever be remembered in his name and is a testament to his legacy.”

    “I’m proud to join my colleagues in the Iowa delegation to rename the Fort Madison Post Office in memory of Martin Graber. As a member of the Iowa legislature, he served the families, farmers, and entrepreneurs of Lee County with class and integrity, and as a Brigadier General in the Iowa National Guard, he sacrificed for our state and country,” said Rep. Feenstra. “Renaming the Fort Madison Post Office is a small gesture that honors his life of service and commemorates his commitment to Southeast Iowa.”

    Read the bill text HERE.

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: July 23rd, 2025 N.M. Delegation Announces President’s Approval of Major Disaster Declaration for Lincoln County, Maintains Push for Major Disaster Declaration for Chaves, Otero, & Valencia Counties

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for New Mexico Martin Heinrich

    WASHINGTON — U.S. Senators Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.) and Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.) and U.S. Representatives Teresa Leger Fernández (D-N.M.), Melanie Stansbury (D-N.M.), and Gabe Vasquez (D-N.M.) released the following joint statement, welcoming President Donald Trump’s granting of a Major Disaster Declaration for Lincoln County, while renewing their call for President Trump to grant a Major Disaster Declaration for Chaves, Otero, and Valencia Counties and authorize Public Assistance Categories C-G in the wake of severe flooding that took the lives of three people and damaged homes, businesses, and critical infrastructure.

    “The loss of life and devastation in Ruidoso as a result of this catastrophic flooding is horrific and heartbreaking. After seeing the destruction firsthand and hearing from families who have lost everything, our thoughts remain with those mourning loved ones and the hundreds of New Mexicans forced to flee their homes or watch their businesses be destroyed. We are deeply grateful to the first responders, local leaders, medical providers, and rescue teams working tirelessly to help their communities recover.

    “This Major Disaster Declaration for Lincoln County will unlock funding needed for disaster response, and we will continue to push President Trump to grant the State’s Major Disaster Declaration request for Chaves, Otero, and Valencia Counties and authorize additional Public Assistance to make sure that all New Mexicans impacted by this disaster are provided with the federal support necessary to rebuild.”

    On July 10, the N.M. Delegation welcomed an emergency declaration for Chaves, Lincoln, Otero, and Valencia Counties. The emergency declaration opened up access to specific FEMA funds for immediate disaster response, including support for search and rescue and incident management efforts. An emergency declaration does not preclude a subsequent Major Disaster Declaration. Therefore, the N.M. Delegation pushed President Trump to approve a Major Disaster Declaration request from Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham.

    Through a Major Disaster Declaration request, the State of New Mexico has requested Public Assistance, Category A through G, including Direct Federal Assistance for Lincoln County, Chaves County, Otero County, and Valencia County, as well as Individual Assistance, including Housing Assistance, Small Business Administration Disaster Assistance, Disaster Case Management, Transitional Sheltering Assistance, Serious Needs Assistance, Crisis Counseling, Disaster Legal Services, Disaster Unemployment, and Displacement Assistance for Lincoln County and Valencia County. The State also requested Hazard Mitigation statewide, as facilitated by New Mexico’s Natural Disaster Hazard Mitigation Plan.

    The N.M. Delegation will continue to push President Trump to authorize Public Assistance Categories C-G and approve a Major Disaster Declaration request for Chaves, Otero, and Valencia Counties from Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham.

    Additionally, on July 15, the N.M. Delegation called on the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Director Russ Vought and Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Acting Director David Richardson to disburse critical and overdue funds that would provide immediate assistance in response to the catastrophic flash flooding in and around Ruidoso.

    In a letter to OMB Director Vought and FEMA Acting Director Richardson, the Delegation urged OMB to release reimbursement funds from a project undertaken in the wake of last year’s South Fork and Salt Fires — currently stalled in “Large Project Review” — so they can be redirected to Lincoln County after recent severe flooding. The project in question was completed last year, has been fully reviewed by FEMA, and has an estimated cost of $7.7 million. These funds could be deployed immediately to assist Lincoln County and impacted residents as they continue to assess and respond to the recent severe flooding. But with no timeline provided to Lincoln County or the New Mexico Department of Homeland Security and Emergency Management (DHSEM) for completing the “Large Project Review” by the Administration, the Delegations is demanding answers. Read the full letter here.

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Grassley, Colleagues Introduce Bipartisan Legislation to Increase Market Competition for Prescription Drugs, Lower Prices for Consumers

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Iowa Chuck Grassley

    WASHINGTON – Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) joined three Senate colleagues to reintroduce the Short on Competition Act to increase competition in the pharmaceutical industry and lower prices for consumers. The legislation is led by Sens. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) and Mike Lee (R-Utah) and sponsored by Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.). Grassley is the current chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee and the former chairman and a senior member of the Senate Finance Committee.

    The bipartisan legislation would allow the Secretary of Health and Human Services to grant expedited reviews and inspections, as well as temporary importation, when there is a prescription drug shortage or if there is likely to be a shortage. The secretary can also take these actions when there are fewer than five competitors in a market for prescription drugs that have been approved for at least 10 years.

    “Iowans are fed up with the high price of prescription drugs, and a driver of those costs is lack of competition. Time and again, we see that limited options in the marketplace lead to higher prices for patients. Our bill will bring more options to the market, giving consumers relief through alternatives to a single high-priced drug,” Grassley said.

    “If drug companies know new competitors can quickly enter the market, maybe they’ll think twice before raising prices in the first place. More competition in the marketplace will lead to more affordable prescription drugs for American consumers,” Klobuchar said. “This bipartisan legislation will help lower drug prices by prioritizing approvals and safely allowing temporary drug importation of products to address markets that lack competition.”

    “Big Pharma monopolies are keeping lifesaving drugs out of reach for too many Americans,” Lee said. “Cutting red tape for manufacturers will allow new competitors into the health care market – bringing drug prices down and quality up. The Short on Competition Act will give Americans more options for the medicine they need, protecting them from drug shortages and lowering their costs.”

    “American families should be able to afford life-saving medication. However, many medications, despite having been on the market for decades, are unaffordable. It is time that Big Pharma is held accountable for its abusive price gouging tactics,” Durbin said. “I am joining my colleagues in reintroducing the bipartisan Short on Competition Act to combat Big Pharma’s price gouging and lower prescription drug costs for Americans. Drug costs are a problem; this bill is a solution.”

    Background:

    Grassley has long championed efforts to reduce the cost of prescription drugs. Three pieces of legislation authored and coauthored by Grassley have been signed into law to combat anticompetitive practices and stop drug makers from reaping profits at the expense of taxpayers and consumers. Grassley has also led in-depth congressional investigations to expose those responsible for prescription drug price gouging.

    Other actions include:

    • May 2025: Grassley chaired a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing focused on the impacts of Pharmacy Benefit Managers’ (PBMs) increasing role in the drug supply chain and the needs of rural pharmacies.
    • April 2025: The Senate Judiciary Committee — which Grassley currently chairs — passed six Grassley-led bills to boost competition in the pharmaceutical industry and improve patients’ access to more affordable prescription drugs.
    • January 2025: Grassley welcomed the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim staff report on PBMs and urged congressional and executive branch action.
    • July 2024: Grassley welcomed the FTC’s interim staff report on PBMs and urged congressional and executive branch action.
    • January 2024: Grassley sent a letter urging the FTC to complete its investigation into the health care industry’s most powerful prescription drug middlemen.
    • November 2023: The Finance Committee adopted a Grassley-led provision to strengthen oversight of Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and hold PBMs accountable.
    • July 2023: The Finance Committee adopted several Grassley-led PBM accountability provisions. 
    • March 2023: The Senate Commerce Committee passed a Grassley-backed bill to hold PBMs accountable for unfair practices driving up costs for consumers.
    • February 2023: The Senate Judiciary Committee passed five Grassley-led bills to boost pharmaceutical industry competition and improve patients’ access to affordable prescription drugs.
    • October 2022: Grassley led a bipartisan letter urging the FTC to complete its investigation into PBMs to shine light on drug pricing practices.
    • January 2021: Grassley and Senate Finance Committee Ranking Member Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) released a two-year bipartisan investigation into insulin price gouging.
    • August 2018: Grassley requested the FTC assess pharmaceutical supply chain intermediaries.

    Learn more about Grassley’s persistent efforts to lower prescription drug costs HERE.

    -30-

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Grassley, Fetterman Introduce Bipartisan Bill to Crack Down on Art Market Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Iowa Chuck Grassley

    WASHINGTON – Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Sen. John Fetterman (D-Pa.) today introduced the Art Market Integrity Act. The bipartisan legislation would require art dealers and auction houses to comply with existing anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing regulations.

    “For decades, criminal enterprises have used America’s multibillion-dollar art industry as a personal piggy bank for money laundering schemes, terrorist financing and other nefarious activities. By requiring our nation’s art market to comply with existing anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing laws, this bipartisan legislation would keep art, and millions of dollars, out of the wrong hands,” Grassley said.

    “Art should be for art-lovers, not terrorists and criminals,” Fetterman said. “For too long, loopholes have allowed Russian criminal kingpins to evade sanctions and terrorists like Hezbollah to funnel money through art deals. I’m grateful to Senators Grassley, Whitehouse, and McCormick for working across the aisle to require art dealers and auction houses to perform basic due diligence. This needs to stop now.”

    The Art Market Integrity Act would:

    • Require art dealers and auction houses to maintain records and report on high-value art market transactions, exempting artists and businesses with under $50,000 in annual art transactions;
    • Align the United States with international standards adopted by the United Kingdom, European Union, Switzerland and China; and
    • Protect the United States’ national security, economic integrity and multibillion-dollar art market from criminals, terrorists, cartels and other bad actors.

    Grassley and Fetterman are joined by Sens. Dave McCormick (R-Pa.), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), Bill Cassidy (R-La.) and Andy Kim (D-N.J.).

    Download the full bill text HERE.

    Background:

    The United States’ art industry is valued at around $25 billion and is the largest of its kind globally. Despite this, our art market is not currently bound by the anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing standards set by the Bank Secrecy Act.

    In 2024, the Treasury Department identified America’s art market as being particularly susceptible to money laundering and sanctions evasion. High-profile cases have further highlighted the urgent need for art market reform, including the indictment of Hezbollah financier, Nazem Ahmad, who used art to evade terrorism-related sanctions to the tune of $160 million.

    -30-

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Klobuchar, Lee, Durbin, Grassley Introduce Bipartisan Legislation to Increase Competition and Lower Prescription Drug Prices for Consumers

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Minnesota Amy Klobuchar

    WASHINGTON – U.S. Senators Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) and Mike Lee (R-UT) reintroduced legislation to increase competition in the pharmaceutical industry and lower prices for consumers. They were joined by the Ranking Member and Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Senators Dick Durbin (D-IL) and Chuck Grassley (R-IA).

    The bipartisan Short on Competition Act would allow the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) to grant expedited reviews and inspections, and temporary importation when there is, or is likely to be, a prescription drug shortage or when there are fewer than five competitors in a market for prescription drugs that have been approved for at least 10 years.

    “If drug companies know new competitors can quickly enter the market, maybe they’ll think twice before raising prices in the first place. More competition in the marketplace will lead to more affordable prescription drugs for American consumers,” said Klobuchar. “This bipartisan legislation will help lower drug prices by prioritizing approvals and safely allowing temporary drug importation of products to address markets that lack competition.”

    “Big Pharma monopolies are keeping lifesaving drugs out of reach for too many Americans,” said Lee. “Cutting red tape for manufacturers will allow new competitors into the health care market – bringing drug prices down and quality up. The Short on Competition Act will give Americans more options for the medicine they need, protecting them from drug shortages and lowering their costs.”

    “American families should be able to afford life-saving medication. However, many medications, despite having been on the market for decades, are unaffordable. It is time that Big Pharma is held accountable for its abusive price gouging tactics,” said Durbin. “I am joining my colleagues in reintroducing the bipartisan Short on Competition Act to combat Big Pharma’s price gouging and lower prescription drug costs for Americans. Drug costs are a problem; this bill is a solution.”

    “Iowans are fed up with the high price of prescription drugs, and a driver of those costs is lack of competition. Time and again, we see that limited options in the marketplace lead to higher prices for patients. Our bill will bring more options to the market, giving consumers relief through alternatives to a single high-priced drug,” said Grassley.

    Klobuchar has long championed efforts to make prescription drugs more affordable.

    Provisions from Klobuchar’s bill to empower Medicare to negotiate prescription drug prices and unleash the power of Medicare’s 53 million seniors to help lower drug prices for all Americans was signed into law in August 2022 as part of a larger health care savings package. In March, Klobuchar and Senator Catherine Cortez Masto (D-NV) introduced the Lower Drug Costs for Families Act, legislation to lower prices by extending the drug inflation rebates enacted as part of the 2022 drug pricing law, and further protecting consumers from price-gouging by pharmaceutical companies.

    In April, two of Klobuchar and Senator Chuck Grassley’s (R-IA) bipartisan bills to promote competition and reduce drug prices – the Preserving Access to Affordable Generics and Biosimilars Act and the Stop STALLING Act – passed the Senate Judiciary Committee. Together these bills would save taxpayers $1.9 billion over 10 years.

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Durbin, Grassley Ask For Unanimous Consent To Pass Their Bill To Crack Down On Pharmaceutical Advertisements

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Illinois Dick Durbin

    July 23, 2025

    The Senators’ bill would force Big Pharma to disclose prices when advertising prescription drugs, the UC request was blocked by a Senate Republican

    WASHINGTON – Today on the Senate floor, U.S. Senate Democratic Whip Dick Durbin (D-IL) and U.S. Senator Chuck Grassley (R-IA) asked for unanimous consent (UC) to pass their bipartisan Drug-price Transparency for Consumers (DTC) Act, a bipartisan bill that would require price disclosures on advertisements for prescription drugs in order to empower patients and reduce Americans’ colossal spending on medications. The United States is one of only two industrialized countries in the world that allow drug advertising. Despite prior support for the measure from the Trump Administration, the request was blocked by a Senate Republican.

     

    “You know the ads with the catchy jingle and flashy images of patients rock climbing, golfing, dancing, [or] parading? Big Pharma spends more than $6 billion a year to flood the airwaves with ads for the latest wonder-drug. Why? Why would they spend this much money to advertise [these drugs]? They [Big Pharma] spend such astronomical sums to promote their drugs because it increases their profit margins. Big Pharma thinks that if they hit you hard enough and often enough ad on TV, not only will you be able to pronounce but [you’ll also be able to] spell Xarelto. You’ll also [be able to] tell your doctor ‘that is my favorite blood thinner, I’ve seen that ad over and over again.’ Don’t take my word for it. The American Medical Association said ‘direct-to-consumer advertising inflates demand for new and expensive drugs, even when these drugs may not be appropriate,’” Durbin said.

     

    “When President Biden announced the 15 drugs that Medicare will negotiate for discounts, most Americans knew the names, maybe even knew the jingle: Ozempic, Trelegy, Ibrance, and Otezla. Sound familiar? Pharma spent hundreds of millions of dollars each year for you to ‘ask your doctor’ about these drugs. The result? Medicare spent $22 billion last year alone on these four heavily advertised medications,” said Durbin.

     

    Last week, Durbin released a report about a new telehealth-advertising scheme launched by Pfizer and Eli Lilly. The report revealed relationships between drug companies seeking to sell their medications, and the telehealth companies hand-picked by these pharmaceutical giants, appear intended to steer patients toward particular medications. As the pharmaceutical industry floods the airwaves with commercials to increase demand for high-cost medications, these new telehealth platforms appear intended to churn out prescriptions to patients with just a few clicks online.

     

    Durbin continued, “With online promotions and new websites, Pharma is urging patients to ‘click here’ to speak with a doctor. But those telehealth doctors are handpicked, they’ve been recruited, and paid for by the drug companies. Pharma is funneling patients to their chosen health care providers, to influence prescriptions for costly drugs. This raises concerns about conflicts of interest and inappropriate prescribing of drugs. All of this is a result of Pharma’s rampant advertising spree.”

     

    Since 2017, Durbin has worked with Grassley to introduce bipartisan legislation to crack down on DTC advertisements. One-third of all commercials displayed on TV are of drugs from prescription drug companies. In 2023, Illinois company AbbVie spent $315 million on TV ads for Rinvoq, an eczema and arthritis drug. Nowhere in the commercial do they disclose it’s more than $6,100 per month.

     

    Durbin continued, “It’s time to end Big Pharma’s secrecy. If they are going to advertise a drug, they also need to [mention] to the American public how much it costs. It’s basic. No gimmicks, no tricks. Just the truth by advertising [what]… the drug companies publish as the official price.”

     

    Durbin continued, “Our common sense plan to require price disclosures in direct-to-consumer drug ads has already passed the Senate once before, in 2018… we knew that 88 percent of Americans support what we’re doing: disclosure of price. In fact, because of our work on this measure, Donald Trump made a statement: ‘Big announcement today: Drug companies have to come clean about their prices in TV ads. Historic transparency for American patients is here. If drug companies are ashamed of those prices—lower them!’”

    “Big Pharma hates being honest with patients about the price of their drugs. They fear it’s going to cut into their profits. Patients, American citizens, and others deserve lower drug prices. The Trump Administration has called on Congress to rein in these deceptive drug advertisements. But Big Pharma is looking for one Senator to come down and object to the passage of this common sense bill. I hope we can pass it right now to deliver real relief at the pharmacy counter,” Durbin concluded.

     

    The Government Accountability Office (GAO) has found that prescription drugs advertised directly to consumers accounted for 58 percent of Medicare’s spending on drugs between 2016 and 2018, while a 2023 study in the Journal of the American Medical Association found that two-thirds of advertised drugs offered “low therapeutic value.” By requiring direct-to-consumer (DTC) advertisements forprescription drugs to include a disclosure of the list price, patients can make informed choices when inundated with drug commercials and pharmaceutical companies may reconsider their pricing and advertising tactics. In recent years, the pharmaceutical industry has sued to keep the prices of their drugs out of their TV advertisements.

     

    Video of Durbin’s remarks on the floor is available here.

     

    Audio of Durbin’s remarks on the floor is available here.

     

    Footage of Durbin’s remarks on the floor is available here for TV Stations.

     

    -30-

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Durbin Meets With New Bureau Of Prisons Leadership

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Illinois Dick Durbin

    July 23, 2025

    Billy Marshall and Joshua Smith were recently sworn in as BOP Director and Deputy Director

    WASHINGTON – U.S. Senate Democratic Whip Dick Durbin (D-IL), Ranking Member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, released the following statement after meeting with Bureau of Prisons (BOP) Director Billy Marshall III and Deputy Director Joshua Smith:

     

    “It was my pleasure to welcome Director Marshall and Deputy Director Smith to my office to talk about reforms I’ve long sought at the Bureau of Prisons under both Democratic and Republican Administrations.

    “I shared my concerns about the significant challenges facing the Bureau, including the impacts of understaffing, the health and welfare of employees and incarcerated people, and facility safety and infrastructure, especially given the Administration’s ill-fated ambition to waste scarce resources to reopen Alcatraz. Additionally, I asked to ensure my bipartisan First Step Act continues to be thoroughly implemented, so its proven successes continue to build over time.

    “We must equip our federal prison system to be safe, secure, and effective and ensure incarcerated people’s successful reentry to society.”

    A photo of the meeting is available here.

     

    During his tenure as Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Durbin prioritized oversight of BOP and established a new Committee practice of holding annual BOP oversight hearings. In April 2021, the Committee held a BOP oversight hearing with then-Director Carvajal to address chronic understaffing issues and other concerns. Later, Durbin called for a new, reform-minded BOP Director after an Associated Press report that found that BOP is a “hotbed of abuse, graft and corruption, and has turned a blind eye to employees accused of misconduct.” Then-Director Carvajal’s resignation was announced less than two months later.

     

    In September 2022, the Committee held its second BOP oversight hearing under Durbin, which was BOP Director Peters’ first time testifying before Congress since taking over as head of the Bureau. At that hearing, Durbin pressed Director Peters about abuse in federal prisons. In September 2023, Durbin held his third BOP oversight hearing.

     

    In February 2024, Durbin convened a hearing entitled “Examining and Preventing Deaths of Incarcerated Individuals in Federal Prisons” at which Director Peters and DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz testified regarding issues related to the operation and management of BOP, including staffing shortages, that contributed to deaths in custody.

     

    Then, Durbin urged BOP to send a special pay rate request to OPM—and urged it approve it—to address barriers to BOP’s recruitment and retention of critical employees and improve safety and security at BOP facilities.

     

    -30-

    MIL OSI USA News –

  • MIL-OSI USA: Congressman Allen Introduces Bill Preserving Consumer Choice

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Rick Allen (R-GA-12)

    Today, Congressman Rick W. Allen (GA-12) introduced the Don’t Mess with My Home Appliances Act. Following the Biden-Harris Administration’s four-year assault on consumer choice, this legislation implements necessary reforms to the Energy Policy Conservation Act (EPCA) to prevent future administrations from prioritizing a radical rush-to-green agenda over the affordability and availability of reliable household appliances that Americans rely on every day.

    Following the bill’s introduction, Congressman Allen issued the statement below:

    “Under the guise of energy efficiency, the Biden-Harris Administration waged a four-year war on domestic energy and consumer choice, and it was American families that paid the price. From gas stoves, refrigerators, and freezers, to washers, dryers, dish washers, and air conditioners—no household appliance was off limits in their pursuit of a radical rush-to-green agenda. We cannot allow that to happen again,” said Congressman Allen.

    “The Don’t Mess with My Home Appliances Act is a necessary measure to prevent future administrations from issuing burdensome standards on household appliances that would drive up costs and reduce availability. I am grateful for Chairman Guthrie’s and Chairman Latta’s support as we preserve consumer choice and ensure the federal government does not tilt the scales on what appliances Americans should buy.” 

    “Families should have the freedom to choose what home appliances they buy and use. Under the Biden-Harris Administration, heavy-handed mandates created unworkable regulations that led to higher prices,” said Chairman Guthrie. “The Don’t Mess with My Home Appliances Act would reform the Department of Energy’s energy efficiency standards process to protect consumer choice and ensure American companies can continue to innovate. Thank you to Congressman Allen for leading this important legislation that stands up for working Americans.” 

    “American families should have the right to choose the appliances that work best for their homes and needs. This commonsense bill puts consumers first by restoring flexibility, encouraging innovation, and ensuring there are not one-size-fits-all federal regulations. I thank Congressman Allen for his leadership on this effort to protect American families and businesses,” said Rep. Bob Latta, Chairman of the Energy Subcommittee of the House Energy and Commerce Committee.

    BACKGROUND: Enacted in 1975, the EPCA provides specific criteria the Department of Energy (DOE) must follow in order to propose a new appliance efficiency standard. The DOE may only propose a new standard if it results in a significant conservation of energy, is technologically feasible, and economically justified. The Biden-Harris Administration consistently ignored these critical consumer protections by proposing and finalizing standards that violate the statute. The Don’t Mess with my Home Appliances Act would prevent future abuses by:

    • Eliminating unnecessary and duplicative rulemaking requirements 
    • Authorizing the Secretary of Energy to amend or revoke a standard if it increases costs for consumers, does not result in significant energy or water savings, is not technologically feasible, or results in the unavailability of product 
    • Protecting affordability by requiring the DOE to consider the cost to low-income households and the full-life cycle cost of appliances when determining if the new standard is economically justified 
    • Establishing minimum thresholds for energy or water savings that must be achieved before imposing new standards 
    • Prohibiting the Secretary of Energy from banning products based on the type of fuel that product uses (no natural gas bans) 

    Full bill text can be viewed HERE.

    MIL OSI USA News –