Category: Military Intelligence

  • MIL-OSI Global: White House spat with AP over ‘Gulf of America’ ignites fears for press freedom in second Trump era

    Source: The Conversation – UK – By Colleen Murrell, Full Professor in Journalism, Dublin City University

    A federal judge in the District Court of Columbia will shortly decide if the US president, Donald Trump, is allowed to dictate the terms of service of the Associated Press (AP), the US wire agency that proudly proclaims it is read by 4 billion people every day.

    In a (typically for this administration) knee-jerk decision on February 11, White House officials informed AP that its journalists would be barred from entering restricted areas such as the Oval Office and Air Force One until it stops using the geographic term “Gulf of Mexico” – in contravention of an executive order renaming it the “Gulf of America”.

    AP’s style guide explains that the Gulf of Mexico has carried this name for more than 400 years, and that Trump’s order only holds authority within the US. It notes that as a global news agency, it “must ensure that place names and geography are easily recognizable to all audiences”.

    But the style guide adds that, while AP will continue to refer to the body of water by its original name, it will do so “while acknowledging the new name Trump has chosen”.

    According to AP’s executive editor, Julie Pace: “Limiting our access to the Oval Office based on the content of AP’s speech not only severely impedes the public’s access to independent news, it plainly violates the first amendment” – which covers freedom of speech and the press.

    In seeking to overturn the ban, AP brought a lawsuit (AP-v-Budowich-Complaint) against the White House chief of staff, Susan Wiles, the deputy chief of staff, Taylor Budowich, and its press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, in their official capacities.

    After a short hearing, Judge Trevor N. McFadden – who was appointed by Trump – declined to restore AP’s access immediately, and instead set another hearing date for March 20. According to the Washington Post, the judge was “not sufficiently convinced the situation was ‘dire’ enough to warrant such an intervention” – and therefore was “not inclined to act precipitously on the executive office of the president”.

    Following this decision, the White House denied access to Trump’s first cabinet meeting on February 26 to an AP photographer, as well as reporters from Reuters, HuffPost and German newspaper Der Tagesspiegel. Instead, officials allowed in cameras from ABC and Newsmax, plus reporters from Axios, the Blaze, Bloomberg and NPR.

    Pick and mix

    But can the president be allowed this pick-and-mix approach to access to the seat of power?

    The White House press pool has been in place for more than a century, with the seating allocation in the press briefing room decided by the board of the White House Correspondents’ Association. As the major American news agency, AP has traditionally held the coveted middle front-row seat, which it still retains – even though senior officials have tweeted veiled threats to rescind AP’s entire White House credentials.

    The press briefing room holds 49 seats, with some seats shared between two companies on rotation, and a few journalists or photographers permitted to stand in the aisles when there is room. Meanwhile, Air Force One (in reality, two Boeing 747s used on rotation) only has room for 13 people to represent the entire White House press corps. The pool on the plane is ordinarily made up of three agency reporters (AP, Reuters and Bloomberg), four photographers (including from AP), three network TV journalists, a radio reporter and two print reporters.

    Trump has an ongoing fight against “legacy” news outlets that dominated coverage before the advent of the internet. These media often have strict editorial guidelines, but the president has regularly dismissed them as “fake news”. During the election campaign, he ignored well-known programmes such as CBS’s Sixty Minutes in favour of Joe Rogan’s podcast.

    At the Pentagon, Trump’s new military brooms have also been sweeping legacy media companies out of their briefing rooms. This list includes NBC, the New York Times, Politico, CNN and The Washington Post. In their place will go Trump-friendly outlets such as Newsmax and the Washington Examiner.

    ‘Privilege, not a right’

    Meanwhile, a petition by media companies is calling on the US government to “honor its commitment to freedom of expression” by upholding “a nonpartisan defense of a free press”. Included on this petition are the Committee to Protect Journalists, the International Press Institute, and the Society of Professional Journalists.

    Members of the press pool are usually the only reporters that get to throw questions at senior members of the administration. Its members follow the president on important trips both nationally and internationally. AP is a widely trusted non-profit news organisation, and its reports get syndicated to media organisations throughout the world, with any profits used to pay for its staff and its newsgathering.

    CNN reporter Kaitlan Collins questions the White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt over the banning of AP from White House briefings.

    The White House released a statement on February 24: “As we have said from the beginning, asking the president of the United States questions in the Oval Office and aboard Air Force One is a privilege granted to journalists, not a legal right.”

    However, having an independent arbiter making decisions about press pool representation is surely preferable in maintaining a free press and accountability than allowing each administration to pick its own reporters – or even its own facts.

    Colleen Murrell received funding from Irish regulator Coimisiún na Meán (2021-4) for research for the annual Reuters Digital News Report Ireland.

    ref. White House spat with AP over ‘Gulf of America’ ignites fears for press freedom in second Trump era – https://theconversation.com/white-house-spat-with-ap-over-gulf-of-america-ignites-fears-for-press-freedom-in-second-trump-era-251163

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI Security: U.S. Central Command Announces New Chief Technology Officer

    Source: United States Central Command (CENTCOM)

    February 28, 2025
    Release Number 20250228-01
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

    TAMPA, Fla. – U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) announced the hiring of Joy Shanaberger as the new Chief Technology Officer (CTO). She replaces Sky Moore, who, as a Navy Reservist, was mobilized to serve overseas.

    The CTO advises the CENTCOM Commander on the implementation of cutting-edge innovations across CENTCOM’s operations.

    “Sky Moore is national leader in defense innovation. Over the course of over two years as CENTCOM’s first CTO, Sky supercharged and mainstreamed innovation into the fabric of our warfighting culture in CENTCOM.  From advances in digital technology integration, to the fast-tracking of AI and counter Unmanned Aircraft System (cUAS) to protect service members throughout the region, Sky leaves a lasting legacy impact here at CENTCOM and we wish her well in her next assignment for the Navy,” said CENTCOM commander, General Michael Erik Kurilla.

    Joy Shanaberger joins CENTCOM as a dynamic leader with a background in defense and military innovation, most recently serving as a Senior Advisor in the Office of the Secretary of Defense.  In Washington, D.C., she drove ambitious joint rapid production programs, increasing military capabilities through leap-ahead technology integration.  Joy previously worked as a Special Assistant in the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, & Logistics, and was the founder and Chief Executive Officer of Boone, a tech-enabled firm delivering intelligent automation and emerging technology to defense and intelligence communities. She holds an MBA from the George Washington School of Business.

    “We are thrilled to welcome Joy to the CENTCOM team. With our continued focus on People, Partners and Innovation, Joy is the right person, at the right time, to enhance lethality and effectiveness in new ways throughout the CENTCOM region,” said Kurilla.

    “Coming from a legacy of service, adaptability, and overcoming challenges, the opportunity to serve at CENTCOM and have a direct impact on the evolving character of warfare is a huge motivator,” said Shanaberger. “CENTCOM is the perfect proving ground to challenge, stress test, and scale innovation. Being able to serve at the tip of the spear epitomizes why I continue to say yes to public service.”

    -30-

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI: Castellum, Inc. Announces the Award of a $103.3 million Contract to its GTMR Subsidiary

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    VIENNA, Va., Feb. 28, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Castellum, Inc. (NYSE-American: CTM) (“Castellum” or “CTM”), a cybersecurity, electronic warfare, and software engineering services company focused on the federal government, announces that its Global Technology and Management Resources, Inc. (“GTMR”) subsidiary has been awarded a $103.3 million, five and one-half year contract for Special Missions Management of On-Site Services (“MOSS”) in support of the Naval Air Systems Command (“NAVAIR”) Program Office 290 (“PMA-290”) Special Missions. The contract consists of multiple Intelligence, Surveillance, Reconnaissance, and Targeting (“ISR&T”) programs but not limited to, the Maritime Patrol and Reconnaissance Force Family of Systems, P-8A Research and Development, SM Platforms, Minotaur Family of Services, P-8A Increment 3, P-8A Foreign Military Sales, MQ-4C Triton Multiple Intelligence, Mobile Quick Look, ground & mission support stations, and future capabilities.

    This award represents the largest contract win in Castellum’s history and is expected to start next month. We will provide all aspects of the acquisition life cycle, including material solution analysis, technology development, engineering and manufacturing development, production and deployment, and operations support. This support encompasses engineering analysis and recommendations for technical, logistics, training, and acquisition life-cycle support for the ISR&T platforms and infrastructure, as well as their accompanying Ground Support Stations and classified network(s) entry facilities. With our leading-edge technology services and solutions, we will support the program maturation and integration of electronic warfare and special missions capabilities.

    “We are building a strong and enduring foundation and winning culture here at Castellum and this major win and new opportunity reinforce the positive and powerful momentum our CTM Team continues to determinedly drive. As an industry leading technology services and solutions company, our CTM team could not be more proud and excited for this special opportunity to support our NAVAIR PMA-290 Special Missions customer as their trusted ‘go to’ prime contractor We are privileged and honored to be an essential part of their team and to help achieve their crucial mission to ensure our nation’s warfighters are armed with the most technologically advanced capabilities in the world and assure their success. And once again, it’s our remarkable team of outstanding CTM professionals who bring world-class skills, talent, experience, and dedication in these key technological domains, that make a very real and positive difference with their vital contributions to our all-important national security needs. This win reflects our uncompromising commitment to our people, our mission customers and our shareholders in our unrelenting pursuit of growing Castellum better and stronger in every way, for the long term. It also reflects the applied effectiveness of our renewed and re-energized organic growth strategy that we agilely and timely adjust based upon market conditions and the constantly evolving needs and capabilities requirements of our mission customers. I could not be more confident and encouraged for our CTM team as we look ahead,” said Glen Ives, President and Chief Executive Officer of Castellum.

    About Castellum, Inc.

    Castellum, Inc. (NYSE-American: CTM) is a cybersecurity, electronic warfare, and software engineering services company focused on the federal government – https://castellumus.com/.

    Cautionary Statement Concerning Forward-Looking Statements:

    This release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These forward-looking statements represent the Company’s expectations or beliefs concerning future events and can generally be identified by the use of statements that include words such as “estimate,” “project,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “shooting to,” “intend,” “plan,” “foresee,” “likely,” “will,” “would,” “appears,” “goal,” “target” or similar words or phrases. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding the Company’s expectations for revenue growth and new customer opportunities, improvements to cost structure, and profitability. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding the Company’s expectations for revenue growth and new customer opportunities including opportunities arising from its contracts with NAVAIR and other customers, improvements to cost structure, and profitability. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties, and other factors, many of which are outside of the Company’s control, that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements, including, among others: the Company’s ability to compete against new and existing competitors; its ability to effectively integrate and grow its acquired companies; its ability to identify additional acquisition targets and close additional acquisitions; the impact on the Company’s revenue due to a delay in the U.S. Congress approving a federal budget, operating under a prolonged continuing resolution, government shutdown, or breach of the debt ceiling, as well as the imposition by the U.S. government of sequestration in the absence of an approved budget; the ability of the U.S. federal government to unilaterally cancel a contract with or without cause, and more specifically, the potential impact of the U.S. DOGE Service Temporary Organization on government spending and terminating contracts for convenience. For a more detailed description of these and other risk factors, please refer to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K and its Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) which can be viewed at www.sec.gov. All forward-looking statements are inherently uncertain, based on current expectations and assumptions concerning future events or future performance of the Company. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which are only predictions and speak only as of the date hereof. The Company expressly disclaims any intent or obligation to update any of the forward-looking statements made in this release or in any of its SEC filings except as may be otherwise stated by the Company.

    Contact:
    Glen Ives
    President and Chief Executive Officer
    Phone: (703) 752-6157
    info@castellumus.com

    A photo accompanying this announcement is available at https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/0bfdbdc0-17de-4f32-a7b1-1494f3d330e5

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI Video: Alwyn C. Cashe: HERO OF THE ARMY!

    Source: US Army (video statements)

    : DMD

    About the U.S. Army:
    The Army Mission – our purpose – remains constant: To deploy, fight and win our nation’s wars by providing ready, prompt & sustained land dominance by Army forces across the full spectrum of conflict as part of the joint force.

    https://www.ausa.org/medal-honor-graphic-novels

    https://www.army.mil/medalofhonor/cashe/

    Interested in joining the U.S. Army?
    Visit: spr.ly/6001igl5L

    Connect with the U.S. Army online:
    Web: https://www.army.mil
    Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/USarmy/
    X: https://www.twitter.com/USArmy
    Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/usarmy/
    LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/us-army
    #USArmy #Soldiers #Military @ausaorg

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wgYPJ5w3uFQ

    MIL OSI Video

  • MIL-OSI: Cheems Memecoin Surpasses 80,000 Holders, Solidifying Its Place as a Leading Meme Token on BNB Chain

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    NEW YORK, Feb. 28, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — The Cheems memecoin ($CHEEMS), one of the most prominent and beloved tokens on the BNB Chain inspired by the namesake meme, has officially surpassed 80,000 token holders, marking a major milestone in its journey as a community-driven digital asset. With 85,205 holders and over 1.8 million total transfers, Cheems continues to gain traction as a dominant force in the memecoin market.

    From Meme to Movement
    What began as a viral meme has transformed into a full-fledged movement. The Cheems IP has transcended internet culture, evolving into a rallying symbol for crypto enthusiasts navigating market cycles. With over 40 million TikTok views on recent campaigns and strong engagement across digital platforms, Cheems is more than just a token—it’s a revolution.

    Built on the principles of fun, inclusivity, and strong community engagement, Cheems has demonstrated remarkable growth since its inception. The token’s on-chain market capitalization currently stands at $188.4 million, with a circulating supply market cap of $178.9 million. As a testament to its widespread appeal, Cheems has become a cornerstone of the BNB Chain memecoin ecosystem, fostering a passionate and rapidly expanding community of supporters worldwide.

    Christian, Founder of Infini, a major Cheems tokenholder and spokesperson, expressed his excitement about this milestone:

    “Cheems is more than just a memecoin—it’s a movement. Surpassing 80,000 holders is a testament to the power of decentralized communities and the limitless potential of the BNB Chain ecosystem. The Cheems Army is growing stronger every day, and this is just the beginning. We’re committed to building a long-term, sustainable project that continues to engage and reward our holders.”

    The CHEEMS Advantage
    Built on the Binance Smart Chain’s scalable and efficient infrastructure, CHEEMS is a fully decentralized, community-owned token featuring:

    • Zero transaction taxes
    • 100% burned liquidity pool
    • No team allocations
    • Fully decentralized governance

    Strengthening the BNB Ecosystem
    The Binance listing comes after months of collaboration with the BNB Chain ecosystem, including:

    • Liquidity pool enhancements
    • Co-branded marketing initiatives
    • Ecosystem development grants

    Philanthropy & Real-World Impact
    Beyond blockchain, CHEEMS remains committed to giving back, aligning with its CryptoForGood initiative:

    • 100% of merchandise proceeds donated to animal welfare charities
    • Collaborations with Cheems’ real-life owner Kathy on global aid initiatives
    • Over 5,500 meals funded through viral TikTok challenges

    With a max total supply of 219,776,051,832,670.73 tokens and an ever-growing user base, Cheems is well-positioned for continued expansion. As the memecoin sector evolves, Cheems remains committed to leading the charge, embracing innovation, and solidifying its status as the “Lord Cheems” of BNB Chain.

    For more details and to join the Cheems movement, visit: https://linktr.ee/lordcheems_bsc

    About Cheems:
    Cheems is a community-driven memecoin built on the BNB Chain. Designed to bring fun and engagement to the crypto space, Cheems has grown into one of the most recognized and celebrated tokens in the memecoin sector. With a strong and dedicated holder base, Cheems continues to shape the future of meme-based digital assets.

    Media Contact:
    Cheems Foundation
    contact@cheems.pet

    Join the Cheems Community:

    • Twitter: @lordcheems_bsc
    • Telegram: t.me/LordCheems_Bsc
    • Contract: 0x0df0587216a4a1bb7d5082fdc491d93d2dd4b413

    Disclaimer: This press release is provided by Cheems Foundation. The statements, views, and opinions expressed in this content are solely those of the content provider and do not necessarily reflect the views of this media platform or its publisher. We do not endorse, verify, or guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of any information presented. This content is for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial, investment, or trading advice. Investing in crypto and mining related opportunities involves significant risks, including the potential loss of capital. Readers are strongly encouraged to conduct their own research and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. However, due to the inherently speculative nature of the blockchain sector–including cryptocurrency, NFTs, and mining–complete accuracy cannot always be guaranteed. Neither the media platform nor the publisher shall be held responsible for any fraudulent activities, misrepresentations, or financial losses arising from the content of this press release

    A photo accompanying this announcement is available at https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/f4fe2fec-9459-4491-9a77-c24c46f6e005

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI Video: Marines Assist U.S. Border Patrol in Strengthening Security at U.S.- Mexico Border | CBP

    Source: United States of America – Federal Government Departments (video statements)

    U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and the U.S. Border Patrol (USBP) partner with U.S. Marines to reinforce the southern border protective barrier near San Ysidro, California. U.S. Northern Command is working together with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) with the emplacement of temporary physical barriers to add additional security that will curtail illegal border crossings.

    Instagram ➤ https://instagram.com/CBPgov
    Facebook ➤ https://facebook.com/CBPgov
    Twitter ➤ https://twitter.com/CBP
    Official Website ➤ https://www.cbp.gov

    #cbp
    #borderpatrol
    #bordersecurity
    #usmc

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4qoriOvJoGY

    MIL OSI Video

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: English Translation of Opening Address by Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi at the Plenary Session with the President of the European Commission (February 28, 2025)

    Source: Government of India

    Posted On: 28 FEB 2025 5:39PM by PIB Delhi

    Your Excellencies,

    I warmly welcome you all to India. The engagement of the EU College of Commissioners with a single country on such a broad scale is unprecedented.

    It’s the first time that so many of my ministers have collected together for any bilateral discussions. I remember how you said that India and the EU are natural partners at the Raisina Dialogue in 2022. And that strengthening and energizing ties with India, will be a priority for the EU in the coming decade.

    And now, you’re visiting India at the very beginning of your new term.This is a milestone moment for India and the EU.

    Excellencies,

    The world is currently undergoing unprecedented change. AI and emerging technologies are leading to socio-economic transformations.

    Geo-economic and political circumstances are rapidly evolving. And old equations are breaking down. In times like these, the partnership between India and the EU becomes even more important.

    A shared belief in democratic values, strategic autonomy, and rule-based global order unite India and the EU.Both countries are mega diverse market economies. In a sense, we are natural strategic partners.

    Excellencies,

    India and the EU have completed twenty years of strategic partnership. And with your visit, we are laying the foundation for the next decade.

    In this context, the remarkable commitment shown by both parties is commendable. About twenty ministerial level meetings have taken place in the last two days.

    The Trade and Technology Council meeting was also successfully organised this morning. Both teams will present a report on the ideas generated and the progress made.

    Excellencies,

    I would like to identify some priority areas of cooperation.

    The first is Trade and Investment. It is crucial to conclude a mutually beneficial FTA and Investment Protection Agreement as soon as possible.

    The second is strengthening the Supply Chain Resilience. Our capabilities can complement each other in sectors such as Electronics, Semiconductors, Telecom, Engineering, Defence, and Pharma.This will strengthen diversification and de-risking, and will aid in the creation of a secure, reliable and trusted supply and value chain.

    The third is Connectivity. The IMEC Corridor launched during the G20 Summit is a transformational initiative. Both the teams must continue working on it with strong commitment.

    The fourth is Technology and Innovation. To realise our shared vision of tech sovereignty, we must continue to make swift progress ahead. In areas such as DPI, AI, Quantum Computing, Space and 6G, both parties must work together to connect our industries, innovators, and young talents.

    The fifth is Climate Action and Green Energy Innovation. India and the EU have prioritised the Green transition. Through cooperation in sustainable urbanization, water, and clean energy, we can become drivers of global green growth.

    The sixth is Defence. We can fulfil each others’ needs through co-development and co-production. We must work to prioritise each other in export control laws.

    The seventh is Security. There is a need for greater cooperation on challenges arising from terrorism, extremism, maritime security, cyber security and space security.

    The eighth is People-to-People Ties. It should be a priority for both parties to make Migration, Mobility, Schengen Visas and EU Blue Cards simple and smooth. This stands to fulfil the needs of the EU. And India’s young workforce shall be able to make an even greater contribution to Europe’s growth and prosperity.

    Excellencies,

    For the next India-EU Summit, we must move forward with ambition, action and commitment.

    In today’s AI era, the future shall belong to those who demonstrate vision and speed.

    Excellency, I now invite you to share your thoughts.

    *****

    MJPS/ST

    (Release ID: 2106997) Visitor Counter : 84

    Read this release in: Hindi

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: Raksha Mantri Shri Rajnath Singh visits DRDO’s Dr APJ Abdul Kalam Missile Complex in Hyderabad

    Source: Government of India

    Posted On: 28 FEB 2025 5:23PM by PIB Delhi

    Raksha Mantri Shri Rajnath Singh visited DRDO’s Dr APJ Abdul Kalam Missile Complex,  the nerve centre for design and development of indigenous missile systems, in Hyderabad, Telangana on February 28, 2025. He was briefed about the missile technologies and related programmes being carried out by Research Centre Imarat (RCI). Secretary, Department of Defence R&D and Chairman DRDO Dr Samir V Kamat and senior scientists & officials of RCI were present on the occasion.

    Shri Rajnath Singh also felicitated the team of the Long-Range Hypersonic Anti-Ship Missile project, successful flight-trials of which took place in November 2024. The successful testing positioned India among the select group of nations with hypersonic missile capabilities.

    Interacting with the scientists, Raksha Mantri commended them for their unparalleled contribution to India’s defence capabilities and exuded confidence that, with concerted efforts, India will find itself among the top-three economies by 2027. He called upon them to continue factoring-in the rapidly-evolving technological transformation into their projects while working with dedication and honesty.

    Shri Rajnath Singh also paid glowing tributes to Dr APJ Abdul Kalam on the occasion. He stated that the former President’s contributions to science & technology, missile development in particular, can never be forgotten.

    In his address, the DRDO Chairman reiterated the organisation’s commitment towards developing critical technologies and ensuring that India becomes ‘Aatmanirbhar’ as well as a technology leader. “DRDO will strive to realise Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi’s vision that defence systems are made in India and made for the world,” he said.

    *****

    SR/Savvy/KB

    (Release ID: 2106988) Visitor Counter : 79

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: Excel in frontier tech by making best use of internationally-competitive infrastructure being set-up in India: Raksha Mantri to youth during National Science Day celebrations in Hyderabad

    Source: Government of India

    Excel in frontier tech by making best use of internationally-competitive infrastructure being set-up in India: Raksha Mantri to youth during National Science Day celebrations in Hyderabad

    “India can remain strong & secure in adverse situations if it has solutions to critical technological challenges”

    Govt’s endeavour is to harness the potential of India’s youth to achieve the goal of Viksit Bharat by 2047, says Shri Rajnath Singh

    Posted On: 28 FEB 2025 2:43PM by PIB Delhi

    Raksha Mantri Shri Rajnath Singh has called upon the youth to inculcate scientific temper and excel in frontier technologies by making best use of the internationally-competitive infrastructure being established in the country due to the Government’s efforts. He was inaugurating Vigyan Vaibhav, a two-day science and technology extravaganza organised in Hyderabad, Telangana as part of National Science Day celebrations on February 28, 2025.

    “War is increasingly moving from hardware to software-oriented. New technological breakthroughs are on the horizon and we have to take a lead in transformative technologies such as Artificial Intelligence, Quantum Computing, Machine Learning and Clean-tech. India can remain strong and secure in adverse situations if it has solutions to critical technological challenges. Our youth must adopt scientific outlook & critical thinking and try to go beyond the ordinary,” said Shri Rajnath Singh. He recalled the words of former President Dr APJ Abdul Kalam who said “Science is a beautiful gift to humanity; we should not distort it but use it for betterment of society”.

    Raksha Mantri reiterated Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi-led Government’s commitment to harness modern technology for the safety and security of the nation, terming education in the field as crucial for the future. India’s youth possesses tremendous potential and it is the Government’s endeavour to harness their capabilities to achieve the vision of Viksit Bharat by 2047, he said.

    Shri Rajnath Singh threw light on the New Education Policy 2020 which aims to transform science education in the country by encouraging creativity, critical thinking and innovation. He added that the theme of this year’s National Science Day i.e. ‘Empowering Indian youth for global leadership in Science and Innovation for Viksit Bharat’ reflects the same approach. He described the theme as a reflection of New India’s aspiration for progress through innovation and global scientific leadership.

    Speaking on the occasion, Telangana Chief Minister Shri A Revanth Reddy stated that Hyderabad has long been a hub of scientific excellence and technological innovation. He urged the young minds participating in Vigyan Vaibhav 2025 to dream big and embrace innovation with passion.

    As part of the event, a grand exhibition has been organised which welcomed over 30,000 students. Featuring 200+ exhibition stalls, it provided a rare opportunity for students to witness cutting-edge defence and aerospace technologies developed by DRDO and leading Indian industries. The exhibition aimed to ignite curiosity, inspire innovation, and encourage young minds to pursue careers in STEM fields, fostering the next generation of scientists, engineers, techno-preneurs who will propel India towards global technological leadership.

    Secretary, Department of Defence R&D and Chairman DRDO Dr Samir V Kamat; President, Aeronautical Society of India (AeSI) Dr G Satheesh Reddy; Director Generals and Directors of DRDO; CMDs of PSUs and heads of industries attended the event.

    Vigyan Vaibhav is jointly organised by DRDO, AeSI, and Kalam Institute of Youth Excellence to commemorate National Science Day in honour of legendary scientist Sir CV Raman and his ground-breaking contributions to science. The event brings together policymakers, scientists, industry leaders, academicians, and young innovators to discuss and showcase advancements that will shape the nation’s future. As India advances towards Viksit Bharat by 2047, it serves as a reminder that the path to self-reliance is paved with scientific excellence, innovation, and collaboration.

    ***

    SR/Savvy

    (Release ID: 2106896) Visitor Counter : 64

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: Raksha Rajya Mantri meets Commissioner for Defence & Space, European Commission in New Delhi

    Source: Government of India

    Posted On: 28 FEB 2025 12:20PM by PIB Delhi

    Raksha Rajya Mantri Shri Sanjay Seth held a meeting with the Commissioner for Defence and Space, European Commission Mr Andrius Kubilius in New Delhi on February 28, 2025. They comprehensively discussed the India-European Union bilateral defence and security cooperation with focus on maritime engagements & information sharing in the Indo-Pacific.

    Shri Sanjay Seth and Mr Andrius Kubilius also explored ways & means to enhance defence industrial cooperation, particularly the participation of European defence companies in joint projects and co-production opportunities in India. They considered the modalities of Indian participation in the European Union’s Permanent Structured Cooperation and other European developmental projects.

    Mr Andrius Kubilius is visiting India as a part of the President European Commission-led delegation along with the College of Commissioners.

    ****

    SR/Savvy

    (Release ID: 2106824) Visitor Counter : 99

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Highlights – International Women’s Day – Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality

    Source: European Parliament

    International Women’s Day 2025 © European Union (2025) – European Parliament

    On 6 March, to celebrate the International Women’s Day, the FEMM Committee, in collaboration with the Directorate for Relations with National Parliaments, will organise an inter-parliamentary committee meeting on “Strengthening the Women, Peace and Security Agenda – Upholding Women’s Rights in Defence, Security and Peace Building”.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Latest news – 03-07 March: Committees and Political Groups

    Source: European Parliament

    In the week of 3rd of March, Members’ work is split between meetings in Parliamentary Committees and political groups.

    Inter-parliamentary Committee meeting on “Strengthening the Women, Peace and Security Agenda – Upholding Women’s Rights in Defence, Security and Peace Building” is held on 6 March to celebrate International Women’s Day.

    ITRE will organise an extraordinary meeting where members will engage in a debate with Mr Kubilius, Commissioner for Defence and Space, within the framework of the Committee’s structured dialogue with the European Commission.

    In addition, a Public Hearing with the Chair of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) and important votes on “Combating the sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children and child sexual abuse material” and on “Reform and Growth Facility for Moldova” will take place.

    Follow the links below to discover this week’s highlights.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: SECOND ADVANCE ESTIMATES OF ANNUAL GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT FOR 2024-25, QUARTERLY ESTIMATES OF GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT FOR THE THIRD QUARTER (OCTOBER-DECEMBER) OF 2024-25 AND FIRST REVISED & FINAL ESTIMATES OF GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT, NATIONAL INCOME, CONSUMPTION EXPENDITURE, SAVING AND CAPITAL FORMATION FOR 2023-24 & 2022-23 RESPECTIVELY

    Source: Government of India (2)

    SECOND ADVANCE ESTIMATES OF ANNUAL GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT FOR 2024-25, QUARTERLY ESTIMATES OF GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT FOR THE THIRD QUARTER (OCTOBER-DECEMBER) OF 2024-25 AND FIRST REVISED & FINAL ESTIMATES OF GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT, NATIONAL INCOME, CONSUMPTION EXPENDITURE, SAVING AND CAPITAL FORMATION FOR 2023-24 & 2022-23 RESPECTIVELY

    Real GDP Growth Rate of 9.2% for 2023-24 is the highest in the previous 12 years except for 2021-22

    Growth Rate of Real GDP for 2024-25 is estimated as 6.5%

    Real GDP has observed a Growth Rate of 6.2% in Q3 of FY 2024-25

    Posted On: 28 FEB 2025 4:00PM by PIB Delhi

          The National Statistics Office (NSO), Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation (MoSPI) is releasing in this Press Note the Second Advance Estimates (SAE) of Annual Gross Domestic Product (GDP) for Financial Year (FY) 2024-25; Quarterly Estimates of GDP for October-December Quarter (Q3) of FY 2024-25 along with its expenditure components and following Revised Estimates of GDP, National Income, Consumption Expenditure, Saving and Capital Formation:

    a.  First Revised Estimates (FRE) for the Financial year 2023-24;

    b.  Second Revised Estimates or Final Estimates (FE) for the Financial year 2022-23.

         These estimates are released both at Constant (2011-12) and Current Prices, in accordance with the release calendar of National Accounts. Detailed Notes on: (i) Second Advance Estimates (SAE) of Annual Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of FY 2024-25, Quarterly Estimates of GDP for October-December Quarter (Q3) of FY 2024-25 and (ii) Abovementioned Revised Estimates for financial years 2023-24 and 2022-23 are given respectively in Part A and Part B of the Press Note.

    Key Highlights:

    1.    Real GDP has been estimated to grow by 6.5% in FY 2024-25. Nominal GDP is expected to witness a growth rate of 9.9% in FY 2024-25. Both the growth rates are revised upward from their respective First Advance Estimates.

    2.    As per the First Revised Estimates, Real GDP has grown by 9.2% in the financial year 2023-24, which is highest in the previous 12 years except for the financial year 2021-22 (the post-covid year). This growth has been contributed by double-digit growth rates in ‘Manufacturing’ sector (12.3%),Construction’ sector (10.4%) and ‘Financial, Real Estate & Professional Services’ sector (10.3%).

    3.    As per the Final Estimates, Real GDP has observed a growth rate of 7.6% in the financial year 2022-23, mainly contributed by double-digit growth rates in ‘Trade, Hotels, Transport, Communication & Services related to Broadcasting’ sector (12.3%), ‘Financial, Real Estate & Professional Services’ sector (10.8%) and ‘Electricity, Gas, Water Supply & Other Utility Services’ sector (10.8%).

    4.    Real GDP is estimated to grow by 6.2% in Q3 of FY 2024-25. Growth rate in Nominal GDP for Q3 of FY 2024-25 has been estimated at 9.9%.

    5.    The growth rate of Real GDP for Q2 of financial year 2024-25 has been revised upward to 5.6%.

    6.   Construction’ sector is estimated to observe a growth rate of 8.6%, followed by ‘Financial, Real Estate & Professional Services’ sector (7.2%) and ‘Trade, Hotels, Transport, Communication & Services related to Broadcasting’ sector (6.4%) during 2024-25.

    7.    Private Final Consumption Expenditure (PFCE) is expected to register a good growth of 7.6% during 2024-25 as compared to 5.6% growth observed during 2023-24.

     

      PART A

    NOTE ON SECOND ADVANCE ESTIMATES OF ANNUAL GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT FOR 2024-25 

    QUARTERLY ESTIMATES OF GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT FOR THE THIRD QUARTER (OCT-DEC) OF 2024-25  

             The National Statistics Office (NSO), Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation (MoSPI) is releasing in this Press Note, the Second Advance Estimates (SAE) of Annual Gross Domestic Product (GDP) for the Financial Year (FY) 2024-25 and Quarterly Estimates of GDP for the Third quarter (October-December) of 2024-25 along with its expenditure components both at Constant (2011-12) and Current Prices. Annual, Quarterly as well as April-December estimates of Gross Value Added (GVA) at Basic Prices by kind of economic activity along with year on year percent changes, expenditure components of GDP and annual estimates of Gross/Net National Income and Per Capita Income for the Financial years 2022-23, 2023-24 and 2024-25 at Constant and Current Prices are given in Statements 1A to 12A of Annexure A.

    I.  Annual Estimates and Growth Rates

              Real GDP or GDP at Constant Prices is estimated to attain a level of ₹187.95 lakh crore in the financial year 2024-25, against the First Revised Estimate of GDP for the year 2023-24 of ₹176.51 lakh crore. The growth rate in Real GDP during 2024-25 is estimated at 6.5% as compared to 9.2% in 2023-24. Nominal GDP or GDP at Current Prices is estimated to attain a level of ₹331.03 lakh crore in the year 2024-25, against ₹301.23 lakh crore in 2023-24, showing a growth rate of 9.9%.

               Real GVA is estimated at ₹171.80 lakh crore in the year 2024-25, against the FRE for the year 2023-24 of ₹161.51 lakh crore, registering a growth rate of 6.4% as compared to 8.6% growth rate in 2023-24. Nominal GVA is estimated to attain a level of ₹300.15 lakh crore during FY 2024-25, against ₹274.13 lakh crore in 2023-24, showing a growth rate of 9.5%

     

    Fig. 1: Annual GDP and GVA Estimates along with Y-o-Y Growth Rates at Constant Prices

     

    Fig. 2: Sectoral Composition and Growth Rates of Annual GVA

    Sectoral Composition of Nominal GVA in FY 2024-25

     

    Fig. 3: Composition and Growth Rates of Annual GVA in Broad Sectors

     

    II. Quarterly Estimates and Growth Rates

               Real GDP or GDP at Constant Prices in Q3 of FY 2024-25 is estimated at ₹47.17 lakh crore, against ₹44.44 lakh crore in Q3 of FY 2023-24, showing a growth rate of 6.2%. Nominal GDP or GDP at Current Prices in Q3 of FY 2024-25 is estimated at ₹84.74 lakh crore, against ₹77.10 lakh crore in Q3 of FY 2023-24, showing a growth rate of 9.9%.

                Real GVA in Q3 of FY 2024-25 is estimated at ₹43.13 lakh crore, against ₹40.60 lakh crore in Q3 of FY 2023-24, showing a growth rate of 6.2%. Nominal GVA in Q3 of FY 2024-25 is estimated at ₹77.06 lakh crore, against ₹69.90 lakh crore in Q3 of FY 2023-24, showing a growth rate of 10.2%.

    Fig. 4: Quarterly GDP and GVA Estimates along with Y-o-Y Growth Rates from Q1 FY 2021-22 to Q3 FY 2024-25 at Constant Prices

     

    Fig. 5: Sectoral Composition and Growth Rates of Quarterly GVA

    Sectoral Composition of Nominal GVA in Q3 of FY 2024-25

     

    Fig. 6: Composition and Growth Rates of Quarterly GVA in Broad Sectors

     

    [Primary Sector: Agriculture, Livestock, Forestry & Fishing and Mining & Quarrying 

    Secondary Sector: Manufacturing, Electricity, Gas, Water supply & Other Utility Services and    Construction

    Tertiary Sector: Trade, Hotels, Transport, Communication and Services related to Broadcasting, Financial, Real Estate & Professional Services and Public Administration, Defence & Other Services]

     

    III. Methodology and Major Data Sources:            

               Second Advance Estimates of Annual GDP and Quarterly Estimates GDP are compiled using the Benchmark-indicator method i.e. the estimates available for the previous financial year (2023-24) are extrapolated using the relevant indicators reflecting the performance of sectors. The First Advance Estimates (FAE) of Annual GDP for the financial year 2024-25 were released on 7th January, 2025, which were based on very limited data and used Provisional Estimates of 2023-24 as Benchmark Estimates. For Compilation of SAE, 2024-25, the Provisional Estimates of 2023-24 used at the time of FAE have been replaced by FRE, 2023-24 which have been compiled using industry-wise/institution-wise detailed information. Thus, overall as well as sectoral variations in SAE from FAE is attributed to revision of benchmark estimates and additional or updated data available on various indicators. The quarterly estimates of previous years along with the First and Second quarter estimates of 2024-25 released earlier have also undergone revision in accordance with the revision policy of National Accounts.

                The sector-wise estimates have been compiled using indicators/data sources like (i) Index of Industrial Production (IIP), (ii) Financial performance of Listed Companies based on available quarterly financial results of these companies upto Q3 FY 2024-25, (iii) Estimates of Major Agricultural Crops and Horticultural crops for 2024-25, as provided by Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare (iv) Production Targets and Summer as well as Rainy season production estimates of Major Livestock Products for FY 2024-25; (v) Fish Production, (vi) Production of Coal, Crude Petroleum, Natural Gas, Cement and Consumption of Steel, (vii) Net Tonne Kilometres and Passenger Kilometres for Railways, (viii) Passenger and Cargo traffic handled by Civil Aviation, (ix) Cargo traffic handled at Major and Minor Sea Ports, (x) Sales of Commercial Vehicles, (xi) Bank Deposits and Credits, (xii) Premium related information of Life and Non-Life Insurance companies, (xiii) Data on outward Supplies of Goods and Services available from GSTN upto January, 2025 (xiv) Accounts of Central and State Governments, (xv) Goods and Services Tax collections etc., available for first 9-10 months of the FY 2024-25. Year-on-Year growth rates (%) in the main indicators used in the estimation are given in the Annexure B.

                Total tax revenue used for GDP compilation includes non-GST revenue as well as GST revenue. The Revised Estimates of Tax revenue for 2024-25 as available in the Annual Financial Statement of the Central Government, along with latest available information from the websites of Controller General of Accounts (CGA) and Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG) have been used for estimating taxes on products at Current Prices. For compiling taxes on products at Constant Prices, volume extrapolation is done using volume growth of taxed goods and services. The total product subsidies at Current prices were compiled using the latest information on major subsidies viz. Food, Urea, Petroleum and Nutrient based subsidy for Centre as available on CGA website and the expenditure incurred on subsidies by most States up to December 2024 as available on CAG website along with the Centre/State-wise RE and BE provision for FY 2024-25. Information available on Revenue expenditure, Interest payments, Subsidies etc. from Centre and States for FY 2024-25 were used for estimating Government Final Consumption Expenditure (GFCE).

                Improved data coverage and revision in input data made by source agencies would have a bearing on subsequent revisions of these estimates. Estimates are, therefore, likely to undergo revisions for the aforesaid causes in due course, as per the release calendar. Users should take these into consideration while interpreting the figures. The Provisional Estimates of Annual GDP for FY 2024-25 along with Quarterly GDP estimates for the quarter January-March of FY 2024-25 (Q4 2024-25) will be released on 30.05.2025.

     

    ***********

    Annexure A

     

    Annexure B

     

    PART B

    NOTE ON FIRST REVISED & FINAL ESTIMATES OF GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT, NATIONAL INCOME, CONSUMPTION EXPENDITURE, SAVING AND CAPITAL FORMATION FOR 2023-24 & 2022-23 RESPECTIVELY

                In this part of the press note, First Revised Estimates of GDP, National Income, Consumption Expenditure, Saving and Capital Formation for the financial year 2023-24 and Second Revised/ Final Estimates for the financial year 2022-23 are given.

    2.         The First Revised Estimates for the year 2023-24 have been compiled using industry-wise/institution-wise detailed information instead of using the benchmark-indicator method employed at the time of release of Provisional Estimates on 31st May, 2024. The estimates of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and other aggregates for the year 2022-23 have also undergone revisions on account of use of latest available datasets on agricultural production; industrial production (final results of Annual Survey of Industries: 2022-23); government data as available in budget documents (replacing Revised Estimates with actuals for the year 2022-23); comprehensive data available from various source agencies like Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA), Reserve Bank of India (RBI), National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (NABARD) etc. and additional data from State/UT Directorates of Economics and Statistics (DES).

    3.         The salient features of the revised estimates at aggregate level are given in the paras as follows.

    Gross Domestic Product

    4.         Real GDP or GDP at constant (2011-12) prices for the years 2023-24 and 2022-23 stands at ₹176.51 lakh crore and ₹161.65 lakh crore, respectively, showing a growth of 9.2 per cent during 2023-24 as compared to growth of 7.6 per cent during 2022-23.

    5.         Nominal GDP or GDP at current prices for the year 2023-24 is estimated at ₹301.23 lakh crore, against ₹268.90 lakh crore for the year 2022-23, showing a growth of 12.0 per cent during 2023-24 as compared to growth of 14.0 per cent during 2022-23.

    GVA and its Industry-wise Analysis

    6.         At the aggregate level, nominal Gross Value Added (GVA) at basic prices has increased by 11.2 per cent during 2023-24 compared to growth of 13.9 per cent during 2022-23. Real GVA, i.e., GVA at constant (2011-12) prices, has increased by 8.6 per cent in 2023-24, compared to 7.2 per cent growth in 2022-23.

    7.         The shares of broad sectors of the economy in overall GVA during 2011-12 to 2023-24 and the annual growth rates during these periods are mentioned below:

    #: Final Estimates; @: First Revised Estimates

    8.         The growth rates of Primary sector (comprising Agriculture, Livestock, Forestry, Fishing and Mining & Quarrying), Secondary sector (comprising Manufacturing, Electricity, Gas, Water Supply & Other Utility Services, and Construction) and Tertiary sector (Services) have been estimated as 2.7 per cent, 11.4 per cent and 9.0 per cent respectively in 2023-24 as against growth rates of 5.9 per cent, 2.4 per cent and 10.3 per cent respectively in the previous years. The growth in real GVA during 2023-24 is on account of growth in ‘Manufacturing’, ‘Electricity, Gas, Water Supply & Other Utility Services’, ‘Construction’, ‘Trade, repair, Hotels and Restaurants’, ‘Financial Services’, ‘Real Estate, Ownership of Dwelling & Professional Services’ and ‘Other services’ as may be seen from Statement 4.2B. However, ‘Agriculture, Livestock, Forestry and Fishing’, ‘Mining and Quarrying’ and ‘Public Administration and Defense’ have witnessed modest growth.

    Net National Income

    9.         Net National Income (NNI) at current prices for the year 2023-24 stands at ₹263.50 lakh crore as against ₹233.91 lakh crore in 2022-23, showing a growth of 12.7 per cent during 2023-24 as compared to growth of 13.3 per cent in the previous year.

    Gross National Disposable Income

    10.       Gross National Disposable Income (GNDI) at current prices is estimated at ₹305.94 lakh crore for the year 2023-24, while the estimate for the year 2022-23 stands at ₹273.39 lakh crore, showing a growth of 11.9 per cent for year 2023-24 as compared to growth of 14.3 per cent in the year 2022-23.

    Saving

    11.       Gross Saving during 2023-24 is estimated at ₹92.59 lakh crore against ₹82.44 lakh crore during 2022-23. Share of Non-financial corporations, Financial corporations, General Government and Household sectors in Gross Savings during 2023-24 stands at 36.0%, 8.2%, (-) 3.1% and 59.0% respectively. Rate of Gross Saving to GNDI for 2023-24 is estimated at 30.3 per cent as against 30.2 per cent for 2022-23.

    Capital Formation

    12.       Gross Capital Formation (GCF) at current prices is estimated at ₹94.68 lakh crore for the year 2023-24 as compared to ₹87.72 lakh crore during 2022-23. The rate of GCF to GDP is 31.4 per cent during 2023-24 as against 32.6 per cent in the 2022-23. The rates of capital formation in the years 2011-12 to 2019-20 and 2021-22 to 2023-24 have been higher than the rate of saving because of positive net capital flow from Rest of the World (RoW).

    13.       In terms of the share to the total GFCF (at current prices), the highest contributor is Non-Financial Corporations followed by Household sector, share of which stood at 44.2% and 41.7% respectively in 2023-24.

    14.       The rate of GCF to GDP at constant (2011-12) prices was 35.2 per cent in 2022-23 and 34.6 per cent in 2023-24.

    Consumption Expenditure

    15.       Private Final Consumption Expenditure (PFCE) at current prices is estimated at ₹181.30 lakh crore for the year 2023-24 as against ₹165.28 lakh crore in 2022-23. In relation to GDP, the PFCE to GDP ratio at current prices during 2022-23 and 2023-24 are 61.5 per cent and 60.2 per cent respectively. At constant (2011-12) prices, the PFCE is estimated at ₹93.85 lakh crore and ₹99.07 lakh crore, respectively for the years 2022-23 and 2023-24. The corresponding PFCE to GDP ratio for the years 2022-23 and 2023-24 are 58.1 per cent and 56.1 per cent respectively.

    16.       Government Final Consumption Expenditure (GFCE) at current prices is estimated at ₹31.04 lakh crore for the year 2023-24 as against ₹27.58 lakh crore during 2022-23. At constant (2011-12) prices the estimates of GFCE for the years 2022-23 and 2023-24 stand at ₹15.44 lakh crore and ₹16.70 lakh crore respectively.

    Per Capita Estimates

    17.       Per Capita Income i.e. Per Capita Net National Income at current prices is estimated at ₹1,69,145 and ₹1,88,892 respectively for the years 2022-23 and 2023-24. Per Capita PFCE at current prices, for the years 2022-23 and 2023-24 is estimated at ₹1,19,516 and ₹1,29,967 respectively.

    Summary of Revisions in the GDP Estimates

    Revision in the estimates of the year 2023-24

    18.       The following statement gives the major reasons of variation between the Provisional Estimates (released on 31st May, 2024) and the First Revised Estimates of GVA for 2023-24.

     

    Sector

    GVA growth in 2023-24

    (at 2011-12 Prices)

    Major reasons for variation

    Provisional Estimate (PE),

    May 2024

    First Revised Estimate (FRE),

    Feb 2025

    Primary

    2.1

    2.7

    GVA estimates of Agriculture, Livestock, Forestry and Fishing sectors have undergone revision due to revision in production estimates of crop sector as per Final Estimate of Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers welfare. The revision in other industries in Primary Sector is due to the incorporation of latest revised data.

    Secondary

    9.7

    11.4

    Estimates of secondary sector have undergone revision due to use of data from source agencies along with detailed analysis of Non-departmental Enterprises (NDE) & Private Corporate sectors and budget documents of Government whereas provisional estimates were indicator based.

    Tertiary

    7.6

    9.0

    Data from source agencies along with detailed analysis of Departmental Enterprises (DE), NDE and Private Corporate sectors have been used for compilation of estimates for FRE 2023-24 whereas provisional estimates were indicator based. Furthermore, the revision in Public Administration and Defence sector is due to the use of detailed analysis of Budget documents (Centre and State Governments) and latest information of Local Bodies and Autonomous Bodies. In case of Financial services, FRE is based on analysis of annual reports of Financial Corporations and data released by RBI, NABARD and other financial regulators.

    Total GVA at Basic Prices

    7.2

    8.6

     

    GDP

    8.2

    9.2

     

    [Primary Sector: Agriculture, Livestock, Forestry & Fishing and Mining & Quarrying 

    Secondary Sector: Manufacturing, Electricity, Gas, Water supply & Other Utility Services and    Construction

    Tertiary Sector: Trade, Hotels, Transport, Communication and Services related to Broadcasting, Financial, Real Estate & Professional Services and Public Administration, Defence & Other Services]

     

    Revisions in the estimates of the year 2022-23

    19.       The use of latest available data from various agencies has resulted in changes in both the levels of GVA and growth estimates for the years 2022-23.

    Revisions in Major Aggregates

    20.       The level of revisions in the major aggregates at current and constant (2011-12) prices are given in the following table:

     

    Major National Income Aggregates and their % Changes

                                                                                       (₹ in Lakh Crore)

    Sl. No.

    Item

    2022-23

    1st RE

    Final Estimates

    % change

    At Current Prices

    1

    GVA at basic prices

    246.59  

    246.47

    -0.1

    2

    GDP

    269.50

    268.90

    -0.2

    3

    GNI

    265.79

    265.20

    -0.2

    4

    NNI

    234.39

    233.91

    -0.2

    5

    GNDI

    273.99

    273.39

    -0.2

    At Constant Prices

    1

    GVA at basic prices

    148.05

    148.78

    0.5

    2

    GDP

    160.71

    161.65

    0.6

    3

    GNI

    158.31

    159.39

    0.7

    4

    NNI

    137.47

    138.51

    0.8

     

    Major reasons for revisions in GVA/GDP estimates for FY 2022-23 are as given below:

    • Use of updated production estimates (Final Estimates) of horticulture crops from Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare, increase in area under fodder crop and increase in production of sugarcane.
    • Increase in input value due to use of Cost of Cultivation Survey (CCS) 2022-23 and Electricity tariff for agriculture sector for the year 2022-23.
    • Use of updated information from NDE and updated information on minor minerals from States in case of Mining & Quarrying sector.
    • Use of final results of Annual Survey of Industries (ASI): 2022-23 and augmented data for non-financial private corporate sector.
    • Use of ‘Actuals’ in place of ‘Revised Estimates’ of different items of expenditure and receipts in the Central & State government budgets.
    • Use of updated information on Local Bodies & Autonomous Institutions.
    • Use of latest annual reports of Public Sector Enterprises.
    • Use of latest data received for Cooperative Banks, Post Office Saving Bank (POSB), Non-Banking Financial Institutions (NBFIs), and Financial Auxiliaries.

    Detailed statements

    21.       List of Statements released in part ‘B’ of the press note is given below. More details of the revised estimates, i.e., FRE 2023-24 and FE 2022-23 are available in Statements 1.1B to 9B of Annexure C, which are given in the PDF format of the press note.

    1. Statement 1.1B:          Key Aggregates of National Accounts at Current Prices
    2. Statement 1.2B:          Key Aggregates of National Accounts at Constant (2011-12) Prices
    3. Statement 2B:             Per Capita Income, Product and Final Consumption
    4. Statement 3.1B:          Output by Economic Activity and Capital Formation by Industry of Use at Current Prices
    5. Statement 3.2B:          Output by Economic Activity and Capital Formation by Industry of Use at Constant (2011-12) Prices
    6. Statement 4.1B:          Gross Value Added by Economic Activity at Current Basic Prices
    7. Statement 4.2B:          Gross Value Added by Economic Activity at Constant (2011-12) Basic Prices
    8. Statement 5B:             Finances for Gross Capital Formation
    9. Statement 6.1B:          Gross Capital Formation by Industry of Use at Current Prices
    10. Statement 6.2B:          Gross Capital Formation by Industry of Use at Constant (2011-12) Prices
    11. Statement 7.1B:          Gross Fixed Capital Formation by Asset & Institutional Sector at Current Prices
    12. Statement 7.2B:          Gross Fixed Capital Formation by Asset & Institutional Sector at Constant (2011-12) Prices                   
    13. Statement 8.1B:          Private Final Consumption Expenditure at Current Prices
    14. Statement 8.2B:          Private Final Consumption Expenditure at Constant (2011-12) Prices
    15. Statement 9B:             Institutional Sectors – Key Economic Indicators at Current Prices

    **************

    Annexure C

    FORMULAE

    1. GVA at basic prices (Production Approach) = Output at basic prices – Intermediate Consumption
    2. GVA at basic prices (Income Approach) = CE + OS/MI + CFC + Production taxes less Production subsidies(i)
    3. GDP = ∑ GVA at basic prices + Product taxes less Product subsidies(ii)
    4. NDP/NNI = GDP/GNI – CFC
    5. GNI = GDP + Net primary income from ROW (Receipts less payments)
    6. Primary Incomes = CE + Property and Entrepreneurial Income
    7. NNDI =NNI + other current transfers(iii) from ROW, net (Receipts less payments)
    8. GNDI = NNDI + CFC = GNI + other current transfers(iii) from ROW, net (Receipts less payments)
    9. Gross Capital Formation(iv) (Financing Side) = Gross Savings + Net Capital Inflow from ROW
    10. GCF (Expenditure Side) = GFCF + CIS + Valuables
    11. Gross Disposable Income of Govt. = GFCE + Gross Saving of General Government
    12. Gross Disposable Income (GDI) of Households = GNDI – GDI of Govt. – Gross Savings of All Corporations

     

    REMARKS ON THE FORMULAE

    1. Production taxes or subsidies are paid or received with relation to production and are independent of the volume of actual production. Some examples are:

    Production Taxes – Land Revenues, Stamps & Registration fees and Tax on profession

    Production Subsidies – Subsidies to Railways, Subsidies to village and small industries.

    1. Product taxes or subsidies are paid or received on per unit of product. Some examples are:

    Product Taxes- Goods & Service Tax, Excise duties, Sales tax, Service Tax and Import, Export duties

    Product Subsidies- Food, Petroleum and fertilizer subsidies.

    1. Other Current Transfers refers to current transfers other than the primary incomes.

    Gross Capital Formation (GCF) at the current as well as the constant prices is estimated by two approaches: – (i) through flow of funds, derived as Gross Saving plus net capital flow from Rest of the World (RoW); and (ii) by the commodity flow approach, derived by the type of assets.

    Click here to see Press Note in PDF format

    ********

    Samrat/ Dheeraj/Allen

    (Release ID: 2106921) Visitor Counter : 310

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: English translation of Press Statement by Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi during the Joint Press Conference with President of European Commission (February 28, 2025)

    Source: Government of India (2)

    Posted On: 28 FEB 2025 3:04PM by PIB Delhi

    Your Excellency, President of the European Commission,

    European College of Commissioners,

    Delegates,

    Friends from the media,

    Namaskar!

    This visit of the President of the European Commission and the College of Commissioners to India is unprecedented.

    This isn’t just the European Commission’s first visit to India, but also the first such comprehensive engagement of the European Commission in any single country. Also, this is one of the first visits of the new Commission in its latest term. On this historic occasion, I warmly welcome the President of the European Commission and the College of Commissioners to India.

    Friends,

    This two-decade long strategic partnership between India and EU is natural and organic. Its core is built on trust, a shared belief in democratic values, and a mutual commitment to prosperity and shared progress.

    In this spirit, we have held almost 20 ministerial level meetings of different sectors between yesterday and today. Sincere and meaningful discussions were held on various regional and global matters. Many important decisions have been taken to elevate and accelerate our partnership.

    We have prepared a blueprint for collaboration in the areas of Trade, Technology, Investment, Innovation, Green Growth, Security, Skilling and Mobility. We have directed our teams to conclude a mutually beneficial Bilateral Free Trade Agreement by the end of this year.

    Friends,

    To strengthen the investment framework, there has also been talk of moving forward on Investment Protection and GI Agreement. In the field of Technology and Innovation, a trusted and secure value chain is our common priority.

    We have also agreed on increasing cooperation in semiconductors, AI, high performance computing and 6G. We have also decided to initiate a Space Dialogue.

    Friends,

    A balance between Ecology and Economy has been our shared commitment, and our cooperation in this direction has been strong. We have decided to conduct a Green Hydrogen Forum and Offshore Wind Energy Business Summit. Joint research shall be undertaken on EV Batteries, Marine plastics and Green hydrogen. We shall also take forward our Joint Plan on Sustainable Urban Development.

    In the field of connectivity, concrete steps will be taken, to take forward the India – Middle East – Europe Economic Corridor or “IMEEC”. I firmly believe that “IMEEC” shall serve as an engine that drives global commerce, sustainable growth and prosperity in the days to come.

    Friends,

    Our growing cooperation on issues related to Defence and Security, is a symbol of our mutual trust. We will take forward our cooperation on Cyber Security, Maritime Security and Counter Terrorism.

    Both sides agree on the importance of peace, security, stability and prosperity in the Indo-Pacific region. We welcome the decision of the EU to join the “Indo Pacific Oceans Initiative”. We will work together on Triangular Development projects for sustainable and inclusive development in the Indo-Pacific region and Africa.

    Friends,

    People-to-people connect is the strongest asset of our relationship. Today, we have reached a new agreement to increase academia, research and industry partnerships between us. I believe that India’s young talent and Europe’s innovation can together create limitless possibilities.

    We welcome the new visa cascade regime of the EU. This will provide better mobility to the abilities of India’s talented youth.

    Today, we have decided to create a bold and ambitious roadmap for the India-EU partnership for the period beyond 2025. It will be launched during the next India-EU Summit.

    Excellency,

    Your visit to India has given new momentum, energy and enthusiasm to our partnership. This journey is the biggest catalyst that will translate our ambition into action.

    I eagerly look forward to the opportunity of welcoming you back to India for the next India-EU Summit.

    Thank you very much.

    ******

    MJPS/ST/SKS

    (Release ID: 2106908) Visitor Counter : 106

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News

  • MIL-Evening Report: Tongan advocates condemn Treaty Principles Bill, slam colonisation

    By Khalia Strong of Pacific Media Network

    Tongan community leaders and artists in New Zealand have criticised the Treaty Principles Bill while highlighting the ongoing impact of colonisation in Aotearoa and the Pacific.

    Oral submissions continued this week for the public to voice their view on the controversial proposed bill, which aims to redefine the legal framework of the nation’s founding document, the 1840 Treaty of Waitangi.

    Aotearoa Tongan Response Group member Pakilau Manase Lua echoed words from the Waitangi Day commemorations earlier this month.

    “The Treaty of Waitangi Principles Bill and its champions and enablers represent the spirit of the coloniser,” he said.

    Pakilau said New Zealand’s history included forcible takeovers of Sāmoa, Cook Islands, Niue and Tokelau.

    “The New Zealand government, or the Crown, has shown time and again that it has a pattern of trampling on the mana and sovereignty of indigenous peoples, not just here in Aotearoa, but also in the Pacific region.”

    Poet Karlo Mila spoke as part of a submission by a collective of artists, Mana Moana,

    “Have you ever paused to wonder why we speak English here, half a world away from England? It’s a global history of Christian white supremacy, who, with apostolic authority, ordained the doctrine of discovery to create a new world order,” she said.

    “Yes, this is where the ‘new’ in New Zealand comes from, invasion for advantage and profit, presenting itself as progress, as civilising, as salvation, as enlightenment itself — the greatest gaslighting feat of history.”

    Bill used as political weapon
    She argued that the bill was being used as a political weapon, and government rhetoric was causing division.

    “We watch political parties sow seeds of disunity using disingenuous history, harnessing hate speech and the haka of destiny, scapegoating ‘vulnerable enemies’ . . . Yes, for us, it’s a forest fire out there, and brown bodies are moving political targets, every inflammatory word finding kindling in kindred racists.”

    Pakilau said that because Tonga had never been formally colonised, Tongans had a unique view of the unfolding situation.

    “We know what sovereignty tastes like, we know what it smells like and feels like, especially when it’s trampled on.

    “Ask the American Samoans, who provide more soldiers per capita than any state of America to join the US Army, but are not allowed to vote for the country they are prepared to die for.

    “Ask the mighty 28th Maori Battalion, who field Marshal Erwin Rommel famously said, ‘Give me the Māori Battalion and I will rule the world’, they bled and died for a country that denied them the very rights promised under the Treaty.

    “The Treaty of Waitangi Bill is essentially threatening to do the same thing again, it is re-traumatising Māori and opening old wounds.”

    A vision for the future
    Mila, who also has European and Sāmoan ancestry, said the answer to how to proceed was in the Treaty’s Indigenous text.

    “The answer is Te Tiriti, not separatist exclusion. It’s the fair terms of inclusion, an ancestral strategy for harmony, a covenant of cooperation. It’s how we live ethically on a land that was never ceded.”

    Flags displayed at Waitangi treaty grounds 2024. Image: PMN News/Atutahi Potaka-Dewes

    Aotearoa Tongan Response Group chair Anahila Kanongata’a said Tongans were Tangata Tiriti (people of the Treaty), and the bill denigrated the rights of Māori as Tangata Whenua (people of the land).

    “How many times has the Crown breached the Treaty? Too, too many times.

    “What this bill is attempting to do is retrospectively annul those breaches by extinguishing Māori sovereignty or tino rangatiritanga over their own affairs, as promised to them in their Tiriti, the Te Reo Māori text.”

    Kanongata’a called on the Crown to rescind the Principles of the Treaty of Waitangi Bill, honour Te Tiriti, and issue a formal apology to Māori, similar to what had been done for the Dawn Raids.

    Hundreds gather at Treaty Grounds for the annual Waitangi Day dawn service. Image: PMN Digital/Joseph Safiti

    “As a former member of Parliament, I am proud of the fact that an apology was made for the way our people were treated during the Dawn Raids.

    “We were directly affected, yes, it was painful and most of our loved ones never got to see or hear the apology, but imagine the pain Māori must feel to be essentially dispossessed, disempowered and effectively disowned of their sovereignty on their own lands.”

    The bill’s architect, Act Party leader David Seymour, sayid the nationwide discussion on Treaty principles was crucial for future generations.

    “In a democracy, the citizens are always ready to decide the future. That’s how it works.”

    Republished from PMN News with permission.

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI Europe: OSCE helps Kyrgyz law enforcement develop strategic approaches to training on cybercrime and electronic evidence

    Source: Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe – OSCE

    Headline: OSCE helps Kyrgyz law enforcement develop strategic approaches to training on cybercrime and electronic evidence

    Workshop participants discuss in groups a competencies matrix on investigating cybercrimes and handling electronic evidence for different criminal justice roles in Kyrgyzstan, Bishkek, 27 February 2025. (OSCE/Juraj Nosal) Photo details

    The OSCE Transnational Threats Department held a national workshop for 15 senior representatives of Kyrgyz law enforcement agencies in Bishkek on 27 and 28 February. The event aimed at building the agencies’ capacities to provide systematic and sustainable professional training and development on investigating cybercrimes and other crimes involving electronic evidence.
    “The complex nature of digital technologies and electronic evidence makes it impossible for all law enforcement practitioners to be experts in this field. For professional training and development to be effective, it is thus essential to first define what types of competencies are necessary for each law enforcement role. Training and educational programmes then need to be adjusted to these requirements,” said Konstantin Bedarev, Head of the Politico-Military Department of the OSCE Programme Office in Bishkek, during his opening remarks. 
    The participants from the Ministry of Internal Affairs, Office of the Prosecutor General, State Committee for National Security and their respective educational institutions discussed the development of two strategic documents in this regard: a competency framework and a training strategy. The competency framework defines skill sets and skill levels for different law enforcement roles involved in the investigation and prosecution of cybercrimes and other crimes involving electronic evidence. The training strategy then outlines a plan for the development and provision of professional training to build the necessary competencies amongst law enforcement practitioners.
    “Today, nearly all crimes include some sort of electronic evidence. Developing adequate skills and competencies in this area among law enforcement and judiciary actors is necessary for effective and efficient criminal investigations and prosecutions in every country,” emphasized Ion Gaina, a digital forensic expert from Moldova and keynote speaker at the event.
    The workshop followed the regional event on this topic held in Tashkent, Uzbekistan on 5-6 December 2024 and was implemented under the second phase of the OSCE’s regional capacity-building project on combating cybercrime in Central Asia, launched in September 2024 and funded by Germany and the United States of America.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Taskforce Drones of the DDPS invites industry to an information event

    Source: Switzerland – Department of Defence, Civil Protection and Sport

    The Taskforce Drones invites companies to an information event on the topic of small drones on 28 February 2025. The event will focus on information of the Taskforce Drones, insights into potential forms of cooperation with public authorities and export law. The Taskforce Drones aims to be able to develop small and medium-sized drones independently in Switzerland and deploy them in the Armed Forces.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Roadshow to reach 2,500 Portsmouth residents missing out on Pension Credit

    Source: City of Portsmouth

    A Pension Credit roadshow is happening around the city, as the council tries to reach some of the 2,500 Portsmouth residents estimated to be missing out on Pension Credit.

    Portsmouth City Council staff are out at various locations talking to older residents and helping them start the application process. From Monday – Friday, 3-7 March, staff will be at another ten venues and people of pension age are encouraged to come along to see if they’re eligible – full list below.

    Pension Credit tops up people’s pensions if they’re on low income, and those who claim it are getting on average £3,900 extra a year, according to the Government.

    Council Leader Cllr Steve Pitt joined the session at the Bridge Centre, Fratton Road, and said:

    “We believe up to 2,500 Portsmouth people are missing out on money by not claiming Pension Credit. That’s as much as £3,900 each that could really help someone to stay warm, pay their bills and do more of what they enjoy.

    “From speaking to older people, it’s clear many don’t realise they qualify. These events are part of the council’s wider campaign to reach people in their communities and help them to apply.

    “If you know an older person on low income who might be eligible, please encourage them to attend, or call the council and we can support them.”

    The engagement activity has already helped many older people start the process of applying, and is resulting in increasing numbers of Portsmouth residents claiming pension credit.

    Portsmouth Older Persons Energy Payment Scheme

    The Council is still offering its one-off payment scheme to some pensioners on low income who didn’t receive the Government’s Winter Fuel Allowance. Applications close on 7 March.

     

    Pension Credit sessions – where to find us

    • Monday 3 March, 9.30am to 11am – Spark Community Centre, Unit 12, The Pompey Centre, PO4 8SL
    • Monday 3 March, 12.30pm to 2pm – Stamshaw and Tipner Leisure Centre, 69 Wilson Rd, PO2 8LE
    • Tuesday 4 March, 10.30am to 12pm – Age UK, 16-18 Kingston Road, PO1 5RZ
    • Tuesday 4 March, 3.30pm to 5pm – ASDA Fratton, PO1 1SL
    • Wednesday 5 March, 10.30am to 12pm – St Margaret’s Church, Highland Road, PO4 9DD
    • Wednesday 5 March, 11.30am to 1pm – Southsea Library, 19-21 Palmerston Road, PO5 3QQ
    • Thursday 6 March, 9.30am to 11am – Salvation Army, The Haven, Lake Road, PO1 4HA
    • Thursday 6 March, 5.30pm to 7pm – Buckland Community Centre, Malins Road, PO2 7BT
    • Friday 7 March, 9.30am to 11am – Somerstown Central Café (The Hub), Winston Churchill Avenue, PO5 4JJ
    • Friday 7 March, 12.30pm to 2pm – QA Hospital outside Main Entrance, Cosham, PO6 3LY

     Look out for council staff in hi-visibility jackets, you can ask them for council identification.

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI China: Xi’s article on properly handling key relationships in economic work to be published

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    Xi’s article on properly handling key relationships in economic work to be published

    BEIJING, Feb. 28 — An article by Xi Jinping, general secretary of the Communist Party of China (CPC) Central Committee, on properly handling several key relationships in economic work will be published on Saturday.

    The article by Xi, also Chinese president and chairman of the Central Military Commission, will be published in this year’s fifth issue of Qiushi Journal, the flagship magazine of the CPC Central Committee.

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Reed Statement on Trump’s Discriminatory Purge of Transgender Military Personnel

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Rhode Island Jack Reed

    WASHINGTON, DC – Today, the Trump Administration issued a U.S. Department of Defense directive that amounts to a complete ban on transgender military service, forcing out current servicemembers and banning transgender people from enlisting.  This Trump transgender policy goes further than the trans military ban implemented during Trump’s first term, which allowed some transgender troops to continue serving.

    U.S. Senator Jack Reed (D-RI), the Ranking Member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, issued the following statement:

    “This is a divisive, discriminatory move that does nothing to keep the American people safe or strengthen our military.  Removing qualified transgender service members means getting rid of highly-trained, experienced personnel who aren’t easily replaced.  It’s a betrayal of these patriotic individuals and undermines the notion of merit-based military standards.  We need high-caliber people who will serve and defend the Constitution.”

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Scientific readings “Worlds of the Russian intelligentsia in the 20th century: profession, society, power” took place

    Translartion. Region: Russians Fedetion –

    Source: Novosibirsk State University – Novosibirsk State University –

    The scientific readings “Worlds of the Russian intelligentsia in the 20th century: profession, society, power”, dedicated to the 100th anniversary of the birth of the honorary professor of the Novosibirsk State University Varlen Lvovich Soskin (1925-2021), took place at Novosibirsk State University on February 26. The readings were attended by scientists from Novosibirsk, Omsk and Tomsk state universities, Novosibirsk State University of Economics and Law, several institutes of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences and the Institute of History and Archaeology of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Among those present were numerous students and former colleagues of the scientist. Also present at the event were V.L. Soskin’s relatives – daughter Marina Guseva, as well as granddaughter Maria and great-granddaughter Anna.

    Moderator of the readings, candidate of historical sciences, associate professor Vladimir Mindolin noted that Varlen Soskin was always characterized by attention to detail and the ability to make strong logical generalizations, for which his colleagues highly valued him. As a humanities scholar, he organically fit into the life of Akademgorodok: at a time when disputes raged between “physicists” and “lyricists”, strong friendly relations connected him with mathematicians, physicists and representatives of natural sciences. Varlen Soskin did a lot to ensure that humanities scholars integrated into the complex scientific environment of the newly created Akademgorodok. He also actively participated in educational activities and was distinguished by outstanding organizational skills.

    Rector of NSU, Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Professor Mikhail Fedoruk said that Varlen Soskin’s students carefully preserve his memory. NSU initiated a great deal of significant research in the field of humanities, which received all-Union, and then all-Russian and world recognition.

    — Varlen Lvovich was the first full-time employee of the Siberian Branch of the USSR Academy of Sciences working in the field of history — he was hired on February 1, 1959, when NSU had not yet opened — the first lecture at our university took place only on September 28 of the same year. From the very beginning, Varlen Soskin linked his life with teaching at NSU, where he had a large number of students. Under his scientific supervision, 37 young scientists defended their candidate dissertations. His influence on the development of the humanitarian direction at the university and in Akademgorodok was enormous. In addition, he was strong in spirit, lived a long life, a significant part of which was associated with the war period, which was reflected in his memoirs and recollections of the times when he was a cadet at the Rostov Military School, and right up to the Great Patriotic War. The scientific readings we are opening today are further evidence that this man was loved, respected and will always be remembered at our university. His memory will live on in his many students, noted Mikhail Fedoruk.

    Participants in the readings recalled that Varlen Soskin, along with historian, academician of the USSR Academy of Sciences, professor Alexey Okladnikov, was one of the founders of humanitarian research at the Siberian Branch of the USSR Academy of Sciences (now the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences). The professor’s students call the subject of his research “explosive” for the Soviet era. He viewed the intelligentsia not as a social stratum, but as the most important social force. Varlen Soskin discussed the fate of the intelligentsia and the cultural policy of the state with the maximum amount of freethinking allowed at that time. Each of his articles and especially his books caused a furor. The entire university attended his lectures, the students loved him, and his colleagues recognized that it was precisely such teachers who determined the university’s noosphere.

    Chairman of the Committee on Traditions of the Union of the NSU Graduates Association “NSU Union”, Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Professor Sergei Netesov emphasized that the traditions that Varlen Soskin brought to NSU are still alive and well.

    – Varlen Leonidovich made a significant contribution to the development of our university and became its legend. The traces he left in the history of Siberia, in the history of NSU, in the history of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences will never be overgrown, they remained in many historical testimonies, – said Sergei Netesov.

    Director of the Humanities Institute of NSU, Professor Andrey Zuyev noted that Varlen Soskin was one of the organizers of humanitarian education at the university, under his scientific supervision 131 students of the Humanities Faculty and then the Humanities Institute wrote and defended their final qualification works. Many of them later became doctors of science, now make a significant contribution to the development of science and occupy quite serious positions in various fields of science and education.

    Director of the Institute of History of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Doctor of Historical Sciences Vadim Rynkov shared his memories of Varlen Soskin’s lectures and admitted that during his student years he underestimated them, citing the differences between the generations of teachers and students.

    — Varlen Lvovich probably felt the age difference between him and the students, and each year he gave us a little less of the main material, and told us a little more about himself and his life experience. Only many years later I began to understand how important it was. Nowadays, studying not only the history of science, but also scientific everyday life is very widespread. And he passed on the history of this everyday life of science to us. Varlen Lvovich was a unique person, a bright representative of Siberian, Akademgorodok science, — said Vadim Rynkin and showed the audience Varlen Soskin’s personnel file, which is kept at the Institute of History of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences. At the same time, he noted that this is the bureaucratic side of the biography of the honorary professor, but, in addition, it is also a unique source of information from the history of scientific everyday life.

    In the memorial part of the readings, the chief researcher of the sector of history of social and economic development of the Institute of History of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Professor Sergei Krasilnikov presented a substantive presentation “Varlen Lvovich Soskin: the life of a scientist, organizer of science, mentor”. There was also a presentation of the book “From the personal perspective of the fate of a historian: on the 100th anniversary of the birth of Professor Varlen Lvovich Soskin”. A specialized issue of the electronic scientific journal of the Institute of History of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences “Historical Courier” was presented, dedicated to this significant date. The opening of the exhibition “Life as a Vocation” prepared by the staff of the Museum of History of NSU took place.

    The scientific readings were held within the framework of two sections: “After the Empire: Intellectual Labor in Early Soviet Society: People, Ideas, Fates” and “Scientists and Power: Role in the Development and Implementation of Large Scientific and Technical Projects”. The reports were heard from scientists from NSU, the Institute of Economics and Industrial Organization of the SB RAS, the A.P. Ershov Institute of Informatics Systems of the SB RAS, the Institute of History of the SB RAS, Tomsk State University, the Historical Archive of the Omsk Region, the Institute of History and Archaeology of the Ural Branch of the RAS, and the Novosibirsk State University of Economics and Law. Various topics were considered: continuity and gaps in intellectual activity, Tomsk University in the era of transformations of the early Soviet period, the struggle to preserve university autonomy, the role of scientists in the field of theory and practice of domestic planning, and the adaptation of the intelligentsia to the conditions of Siberian exile in the 1920s.

    Reference:

    Varlen Lvovich Soskin is a participant in the Great Patriotic War: a cadet of the artillery school (1943-1944), fought in the active army (1944-1945), was wounded. He graduated from the history department of Leningrad State University (1952) and completed his postgraduate studies at the Novosibirsk State Pedagogical Institute (1956) under the supervision of Assoc. Prof. P. D. Chaplik. Candidate of Historical Sciences (1957); dissertation topic: “The role of the city’s patronage over the village in the CPSU’s struggle to strengthen the alliance of the working class and the peasantry during the recovery period (1921-1925)”. Doctor of Historical Sciences (1969); dissertation topic: “Cultural construction in Siberia (1917-1923)”. Senior Researcher (1962). Associate Professor (1966). Professor (1970). Honored Scientist of the Russian Federation (1997). Honored Worker of Higher Education of the Russian Federation (2012). Honorary Professor of NSU (2012).

    He worked in general education institutions and universities in Kemerovo and Novosibirsk (1952–1959). Since 1959, he has been an employee of the Siberian Branch of the USSR Academy of Sciences / Russian Academy of Sciences: senior research fellow of the Standing Commission on Social Sciences of the Presidium of the Siberian Branch of the USSR Academy of Sciences (since 1959); senior research fellow of the Department of Humanities Research at the Institute of Economics and Industrial Organization (since 1961); senior research fellow (since 1967), head of the sector for the history of cultural construction (1970–1995), chief research fellow (1995–2012) of the Institute of History, Philology and Philosophy / Institute of History.

    He worked at NSU part-time since 1964. One of the founders of historical training at the Faculty of Humanities. Associate Professor (1964–1969), Professor (1969–2017) of the Department of History of the USSR/Russian History.

    State awards: Order of the Patriotic War, 2nd class, medals “For Courage”, “For Victory over Germany”, “For the Capture of Königsberg”, “For Valiant Labor”, etc.

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Murphy, Underwood Demand Answers from DHS on Executive Actions and Funding Decisions

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Connecticut – Chris Murphy

    February 27, 2025

    WASHINGTON—U.S Senator Chris Murphy (D-Conn.), Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Homeland Security, and U.S. Representative Lauren Underwood (D-Ill.), Acting Ranking Member of the U.S. House Appropriations Subcommittee on Homeland Security, on Thursday sent a letter to U.S. Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem raising concerns about the implementation and funding of recent Executive Actions affecting the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). Murphy and Underwood emphasize the consequences of prioritizing civil immigration enforcement over national security threats and call for transparency on DHS’s compliance with existing laws, funding decisions, and policy changes.

    Full text of the letter is available HERE and below:

    Dear Secretary Noem,  

    The recent Executive Actions direct significant changes across the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) with potentially grave implications for the DHS mission, its employees, American communities, and for the resources provided by Congress in prior fiscal years (FY). Given the consequences of prioritizing civil immigration enforcement over the prevention of future attacks against the United States, we have several questions relating to the execution and implementation of the identified subject areas below. We request the information and responses by March 5, unless otherwise indicated.

    Specifically, we ask for:

    1. Written updates on the status of DHS’s review of grants for non-governmental organizations pursuant to the Presidential Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies entitled “Advancing United States Interests When Funding Nongovernmental Organizations” (February 6, 2025).
    2. Written updates on the status of DHS’s compliance with current law relating to requests for assistance to the Department of Defense (DOD), specifically whether DHS complied with the requirement to conduct an ‘alternatives analysis’ and a cost-benefit analysis as specified.2
    3. Written updates on the status of DHS’s compliance with the Ms. L, et al. vs. ICE, et al. court settlement regarding family separation. Additionally, please provide responses relating to the questions below on any funding agreements DHS has signed since January 20, 2025.
    4. Please provide written copies of all DHS or component specific memorandums and field guidance that cover the implementation of the Executive Actions and other policy changes that impact DHS signed since January 20, 2025.
      1. To the extent detailed funding implications are not covered in the memos or guidance (as described below), please provide responses to the following:
        1. If using current or prior year funds to execute the Executive Actions, please identify by Executive Action(s), the directed action within such Executive Action(s), the funding source(s) (by account/Program Project Activity), and total amount(s); and
        2. If additional resources are needed, please identify the type of resources (e.g., personnel, assets, etc.), the Executive Action(s) supported through these resources, anticipated amount(s) and source(s) for those funds, including whether Congress should anticipate a budget amendment to FY 2025.

    Please specify whether DHS, or any component, plan to make any changes from direction provided in the FY 2024 enacted appropriations bill (P.L. 118-47, Division C) and the accompanying Joint Explanatory Statement regarding the purpose(s) for funding provided, including any level(s) specified, such as hiring levels, detention beds, etc. during the period of the continuing resolution.

    1. If so, when will DHS provide notice to the Committees on these changes?
    2. What quantifiable measures does DHS, or any component, plan to use to assess the results of the Executive Actions issued after January 20, 2025?
    3. Do any funds Congress provided for the Shelter and Services Program (SSP), Citizenship and Integration Grant Program, and the Case Management Pilot Program remain frozen or paused?
      1. If funds for these programs remain frozen or paused, please explain the statutory authority permitting DHS to freeze or pause Congressionally appropriated funding and the process and timeline for DHS to make those funds available to recipients.
      2. Please provide a timeline of any actions taken related to the funding freeze or pause, as well as how the review of these programs has been handled.
      3. Please provide a copy of any additional departmental guidance from DHS leadership related to these funds.
    4. Please provide written copies of all external funding agreements DHS has entered since January 20, 2025, including interagency agreements, federal partnership agreements, and agreements with non-federal entities, to include agreements with state, local, and tribal governments.

    In conclusion, as we move forward in the 119th Congress we trust that the transparency, communication, and commitment to work with our Committees will continue as it has in prior Administrations. We look forward to your response and your response to our joint letter to you from February 14th that is past our requested deadline.

    Sincerely,

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-Evening Report: Political fighting over Chinese warships misses the point: Australia’s navy is no match for China’s built-up force

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Richard Dunley, Senior Lecturer in History and Maritime Strategy, UNSW Sydney

    Over the past few days, the Australian media has been dominated by the activities of the Chinese navy’s Task Group 107 as it has progressed south along the Australian coast and conducted a series of live-fire exercises.

    Much of the discussion has been rather breathless in nature, with accusations of “gunboat diplomacy” being bandied around.

    The live-fire exercises have also dominated the Australian political debate. Amid all the accusations, the fact that these exercises are routine and entirely legal has gotten lost.

    The Australian government was correct to lodge a complaint with its Chinese counterpart when one of these exercises disrupted civilian aviation. But the overall response has been an extraordinary overreaction.

    There is no indication the Chinese vessels undertook any surface-to-air exercises, and it remains unclear whether the initial firings involved medium-calibre weapons or smaller arms.

    Either way, the facts suggest the disruption from the Chinese vessels was caused by inexperience or poor procedure, rather than some more nefarious purpose.

    This is not to suggest the People’s Liberation Army-Navy’s (PLA-N) deployment is unimportant, but as happens all too often, the Australian public debate is missing the wood for the trees.

    While a number of retired naval officers have publicly played down the significance of the live-fire exercises, these voices have generally been drowned out by the politicisation of the issue. This highlights the failure of the Department of Defence to communicate effectively to the public.

    In other countries, including the United States, senior officers are given far more leeway to make public statements in matters within their purview.

    Had Vice Admiral Mark Hammond, the chief of navy, or Vice Admiral Justin Jones, the chief of Joint Operations, been empowered to explain how live-fire exercises are routine and are commonly carried out by Australian warships on deployment in our region, we may have avoided this unhelpful stoush.

    The remarkable growth of the Chinese navy

    The real significance of the activities of Task Group 107 is the way it has revealed the very different trajectories of the PLA-N and its Royal Australian Navy counterpart.

    The task group is made up of a Type 055 Renhai-class cruiser, a Type 054A Jiangkai II frigate and a Type 903 Fuchi-class replenishment ship. This is a powerful force that symbolises the rapid development of the Chinese navy.

    The Renhai-class cruisers are acknowledged to be some of the most capable surface combatants currently in operation.

    They are 13,000 tonnes in size and are armed with 112 vertical-launch system (VLS) missile tubes. The Australian navy’s premier surface warship, the Hobart-class destroyer, is just 7,000 tonnes and has 48 VLS missiles cells.

    These are very crude metrics, but it would be foolhardy to assume Chinese technology is dramatically inferior to that of Australia or its allies. Similarly, China’s Type 054A frigates are comparable to the general-purpose frigates that Australia is currently trying to acquire.

    Since 2020, China has commissioned eight Type 055 cruisers, adding to a fleet of more than 30 Type 52C and Type 52D destroyers and an even greater number of Type 054A frigates.

    This build-up vastly exceeds that of any other navy globally. Chinese shipyards are churning out the same combat power of the entire Royal Australian Navy every couple of years.

    Until recently, we have seen remarkably little of this naval capability in our region. A PLA-N task force operated off the northeast coast of Australia in 2022. Last year, a similar force was in the South Pacific. Most analysts expect to see more Chinese vessels in Australia’s region over the coming years.

    One significant limitation on Chinese overseas deployments has been the PLA-N’s small force of replenishment ships, which resupply naval vessels at sea.

    As the PLA-N’s capabilities continue to grow and priorities shift, this appears to be changing. A recent US Department of Defence report noted that China was expected to build further replenishment ships “to support its expanding long-duration combatant ship deployments”.

    Australia struggling to keep up

    In response to the Chinese build-up, Australia is investing heavily to rebuild its navy. However, this process has been slow and beset by problems.

    Indeed, this week, the Defence Department revealed that the selection of the design for the new Australian frigate has been postponed into 2026.

    This leaves the navy with a limited fleet of just 11 surface combatants, the majority of which are small and ageing Anzac-class frigates.

    The arrival of the Chinese task group also sheds an unfavourable light on other recent decisions.

    The cuts to the Arafura-class offshore patrol vessel program make sense from some perspectives. But these ships would have provided additional options to persistently shadow foreign warships in Australian areas of interest.

    Similarly, the growing need of Australian ships to escort Chinese vessels in our region will place an increasing strain on Australian replenishment capability.

    At present, both of Australia’s resupply ships are out of service. Additional capacity was also cut from the recent defence budget.

    The activities of the Chinese task force are not some aggressive move of gunboat diplomacy in our region.

    In many ways, this sensationalist messaging has distracted from a much bigger issue. The presence of Chinese naval ships in our region is going to be a fact of life. And due to failures from both sides of politics over the past 15 years, Australia’s navy is ill-equipped to meet that challenge.

    Richard Dunley does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. Political fighting over Chinese warships misses the point: Australia’s navy is no match for China’s built-up force – https://theconversation.com/political-fighting-over-chinese-warships-misses-the-point-australias-navy-is-no-match-for-chinas-built-up-force-251039

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI USA: Lummis, Crapo, Risch Release Statements Praising New USFS Chief

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Wyoming Cynthia Lummis

    WASHINGTON, D.C. – Senate Western Caucus Chair Cynthia Lummis (R-WY), along with Senators Mike Crapo (R-ID) and Jim Risch (R-ID) released the following statements today regarding the announcement that Tom Schultz will serve as the 21st chief of the U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service. 

    “President Trump and Secretary Rollins have made a great choice in naming Tom Schultz to lead the U.S. Forest Service,” said Lummis. “Tom is a University of Wyoming graduate and I’m confident that he is the leader who will bring balance back to the Forest Service and return the agency to responsible logging and management. I look forward to working with Tom to restore and protect our country’s great national forests.”

    “Congratulations to Idaho’s own Tom Schultz for being named the 21st Chief of the U.S. Forest Service. Tom is a forester’s forester. With over 27 years of natural resource management experience, he is the no-nonsense leader our Western states urgently need to rein in the wildfire crisis and reinforce forest health,” said Risch. “Tom’s selection to lead the U.S. Forest Service underscores President Trump and Secretary Rollins’ recognition of the immense value that Idahoans bring to restoring American greatness. I look forward to the good work Tom will accomplish for our nation and the West.”

    “Tom Schultz’s deep on-the-ground experience and skills, including his long-time service in Idaho, will be critically useful as he manages our federal forests,” said Crapo. “He intimately understands how federal decision-making impacts our great state, and I look forward to working with him in this capacity.”

    Background:

    Schultz previously served as vice president of resources and government affairs at Idaho Forest Group, where he led timber procurement operations and managed relationships with government officials at all levels. A former U.S. Air Force officer, Schultz also served as director of the Idaho Department of Lands, overseeing the management of several million surface acres of endowment lands and minerals. He held leadership roles in Montana’s Department of Natural Resources and Conservation, managing the Trust Lands and Water Resources Divisions.

    Schultz holds a bachelor’s degree in government from the University of Virginia, a master’s degree in political science from the University of Wyoming, and a master’s degree in forestry from the University of Montana.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Fischer Questions John Phelan at Confirmation Hearing

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Nebraska Deb Fischer

    Today, U.S. Senator Deb Fischer (R-Neb.), a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, questioned John Phelan at the confirmation hearing on his nomination to be Secretary of the Navy.

    During the hearing, Senator Fischer asked Phelan about his commitment to ensure that the Department of Defense complies with existing statutory requirements to continue funding the development of the nuclear-armed sea-launched cruise missile (SLCM-N). She also asked about his plans to increase munitions production and address longstanding challenges with the shipbuilding industrial base.

    Click the image above to watch a video of Senator Fischer’s questioning

    Click here to download audio

    Click here to download video

    Fischer Questions Phelan:

    Senator Fischer: I appreciate you putting yourself forward to serve your country in this capacity. Mr. Phelan, in your advanced policy questions to the committee, you stated: “If confirmed, I will ensure that the Department complies with existing statutory requirements to continue funding development of the nuclear sea-launched cruise missile.” Do you stand by that statement? Yes, or no?

    John Phelan: Senator, I think the nuclear sea-launched cruise missile is a very important program. I have not been read in on the briefings on that, but I know it is a critical component to our defense.

    Senator Fischer: 
    And will you follow those statutory requirements?

    John Phelan: Yes, I will.

    Senator Fischer: Thank you, sir. To follow up on the shipbuilding part that’s been discussed by the chairman, the Strategic Posture Commission recommended the establishment of additional shipyards dedicated to nuclear-powered ships and submarines. If confirmed, would you be open to exploring that option?

    John Phelan: Yes, I would, Senator. I think it’s a very important part of our strategic focus.

    Senator Fischer: What we’ve learned from the war in Ukraine is that the United States’ defense industrial base was not equipped to scale up production rates of munitions for these modern conflicts. Is it your view that the United States must further increase munition production capacity?

    John Phelan: Yes, Senator, I think we’re at a critical shortage, and we have far too much dependence on one facility.

    Senator Fischer: Do you have any initial thoughts that you can share with us about steps that maybe you would be taking to ensure that the Navy has the munitions stockpiles that are required to meet the needs of the combatant commanders?

    John Phelan: Yes, Senator. I think, as you know, we are short munitions, as we’ve seen. I think we need to create more of a manufacturing base and incentivize more munitions plants in order to supplement what we already have. So, if confirmed, I intend to focus on this very quickly and get that resolved because I think we’re at a dangerously low level from a stockpile perspective, and as well as new.

    So I will use the skills that I had in the business world in terms of incenting. I think a lot of that also comes with working with you and the committee and Congress because we do need to send signals to the private sector to incentivize them to build these plants to get going. So, ordering and giving them a contract to build I think will be critical. And I’d like to believe we should be able to create a win-win between the private sector and for the taxpayer of the United States.

    Senator Fischer: You mentioned contracts with shipbuilding too: to be able to do a review of those contracts to make sure that there are incentives, so that private companies can make profits with that. You mentioned contracts again now. Would you look at that as well – look in depth on current contracts that we have with regards to our munitions? And if maybe what we’re looking at here are roadblocks in being able to move ahead with being able to provide these munitions?

    John Phelan: Thank you for the question, Senator. Yes, I intend to sit down – day one – and we are going to go through every contract that we have and understand what exactly they say; what flexibility they do or do not give us; what contract needs to change or not change and why. I intend to do the same thing as it relates to an audit.

    I need to understand why the Navy cannot pass an audit. The Marine Corps has done it two years running now. They deserve a lot of credit for that. I think that’s a great thing. We are going to change and create much more accountability and understanding, because all of these things affect readiness. And as I said in my statement, readiness is critical, and I think we are at a very critical inflection point, particularly versus our peer nuclear adversaries.

    So these are all things that are a reflection of a culture, as I mentioned, in decay. We really need to have a tight focus on these things. If we don’t know where our inventory is, how can we have a training mission? You know, I’ve heard stories of training missions that have failed because the equipment wasn’t there, and so we ended up losing that money, and that’s not good.

    Senator Fischer: Thank you very much, sir.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Chairman Wicker Leads SASC Hearing on Secretary of the Navy Nominee John Phelan

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Mississippi Roger Wicker

    WASHINGTON – U.S. Senator Roger Wicker, R-Miss., the Chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, today chaired a hearing reviewing the nomination of Mr. John Phelan to be Secretary of the Navy.

    In his opening statement, Chairman Wicker described the crisis of readiness and growth within the fleet even as the Navy receives increased budgetary support. These challenges, the Chairman argued, demand bold leadership to achieve better outcomes for U.S. naval strength.

    Chairman Wicker highlighted past naval leadership failures to address amphibious ship and submarine construction, ship repair, and an overall vision for future force structure.

    Phelan, an accomplished financier and business leader, met with Chairman Wicker in January to discuss his nomination. Read more about Chairman Wicker’s vision for the Navy here and here.

    Read Senator Wicker’s opening statement as delivered below.

    The hearing will come to order. The committee on Armed Services is meeting to consider the nomination of Mr. John Phelan to be Secretary of the Navy.

    Mr. Phelan has had a distinguished career in the private sector. His background showcases his ability to manage complex business deals to drive efficiency and to deliver results. Our Navy will need someone with all three of those skills and more to get our Navy back on the right track.

    The Navy is up against significant challenges, and the nominee before us can be a crucial part of that solution. We, also, my colleagues – need to be part of that solution.

    Congress, industry, and Navy leadership have all contributed to these problems. We must all work together to solve the issues facing us. We must begin by addressing the most urgent need – getting ship building back on track. Our sailors have performed admirably in combat operations, but Navy leadership has been unable to grow the fleet even as its budget has been increased.

    The Navy remains woefully short of the statutory requirement of 355 ships – the statutory requirement. Just about every major shipbuilding program is behind schedule, over budget, or irreparably off track. For years, we’ve seen significant delays. The failures are everywhere. Ford-class carriers, Virginia-class submarines, Constellation-class frigates all are behind schedule. Every year, the Navy shipbuilding plan promises future growth. In reality, we’ve only watched as the fleet diminished.

    In December 2020, the shipbuilding plan said the Navy would grow to 315 ships by 2025. Here we are in 2025, and we have only 287 ships. It’s clear that we have not gotten the job done. We have not gotten the job done. Together, we can work to fix that.

    We must stabilize shipbuilding programs, adopt commercial best practices, and incentivize the shipyards to address workforce and productivity issues in a collaborative, rather than combative manner. And we can quickly inject innovation into naval procurement, particularly on unmanned ships.

    The story of naval maintenance is no better than the story of shipbuilding. Our maintenance performance is unimpressive across ship classes. For just one example, last year, multiple amphibious ships were unable to deploy on time. Instead, they sat in the yards waiting for repairs. Sailors have been trained on fewer than half the required maintenance tasks and only have enough time to accomplish 40% of required maintenance. The reduced quality of recruits exacerbates the situation.

    This chain of events raises cost and creates schedule challenges for ship repair yards down the line. Deployments increase and the number of older ships decreases, sending the Navy into a death spiral.

     

    I’m painting a dismal picture, but an accurate picture.

    The Navy struggles to man the fleet. The previous administration paid too much attention to demographic traits, which contributed to the Navy’s failure to meet its recruiting goals. The Navy did eventually meet last year’s recruiting targets, but only by lowering standards. Last year, nearly 20% of Navy recruits were considered category IV – they tested below the 30th percentile on the military aptitude test – below the 30th percentile.

    Recruiting has improved significantly over the last few months, but the Navy must keep up this recruiting pace for the next three years to fill the estimated 20,000 vacancies on our ships today. Consistently deploying undermanned ships exhausts sailors and creates real operational risks, as the Navy knows all too well from its own accident investigations.

    The stakes are high. We face a threat environment more complex than any since World War II. Our Naval forces must be ready to operate in highly contested environments from the Western Pacific to the Atlantic, and from the North Sea to the Red Sea and beyond.

    The Navy’s role in our national security is more important than any moment since World War II at exactly the worst time the service has been beset with poor management and a lack of vision.

    I’m pleased with the nominee’s track record. He has rescued companies in distress. Our Navy is certainly in distress and needs that same kind of leadership.

    So, I look forward to hearing Mr. Phelan’s views about how to fix shipbuilding, maintenance, and recruitment in the Navy, and I now recognize ranking member Reed for his opening remarks.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: At Hearing, Navy Secretary Nominee Agrees with Warren that Defense Contractors’ Greed Impacts Navy’s Readiness

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Massachusetts – Elizabeth Warren

    February 27, 2025

    “We waste taxpayer dollars, delay missions. We actually put people at risk because we are not permitting basic right-to-repair. Technical data needs to be a “must have” in acquisition contracts for the Navy.” 

    Video of Exchange (YouTube) 

    Washington, D.C. – At a hearing of the Senate Armed Services Committee, U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Ranking Member of the Senate Armed Services Subcommittee on Personnel, questioned Mr. John Phelan, the nominee to be Secretary of the Navy, about his views on ensuring the Navy’s right to repair its own equipment – one of Senator Warren’s priorities. 

    Mr. Phelan agreed that examples of defense contractor restrictions on crucial repairs “do not make sense,” that the resulting delays and cost are an inefficient use of taxpayer dollars, and that they risk the Navy’s readiness. However, Mr. Phelan stopped short of committing to using his tenure as Secretary of the Navy to advance the Navy’s right to repair its own equipment. 

    Mr. Phelan said military contracts, which often include restrictions on what technical data the Navy can access to maintain and repair equipment, “really need to be reviewed,” and said he intends to focus on reviewing contracts if confirmed.

    Senator Warren highlighted existing bipartisan support on the Armed Services Committee for addressing repair restrictions and called for acquisition contracts to include access to the necessary technical data that will allow servicemembers to repair military equipment faster, more easily, and more cost-effectively. 

    Transcript: Hearing to Consider the Nomination of Mr. John C. Phelan to be Secretary of the Navy
    Senate Committee on Armed Services 
    February 27, 2025 

    Senator Elizabeth Warren: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. So, congratulations on your nomination Mr. Phelan. Let’s talk about efficiency at the Defense Department. 

    Last year, the Navy asked for $260 billion to buy everything from ships to night vision goggles. One reason it costs so much? Big defense contractors slip restrictions into their contracts that deny sailors access to technical data they need to maintain or repair equipment, even equipment that the Navy owns. 

    So, I want to give you an example. The Navy’s Littoral Combat Ships are designed to operate close to shore, to hunt mines, and to sink submarines. But this ship has been bogged down with maintenance issues. And when something breaks, sailors are not allowed to make repairs themselves because Lockheed Martin and General Dynamics don’t let them have access to the necessary data and materials. So what does the Navy do? The Navy has to fly contractors out to these ships, which Pro Publica found adds “millions of dollars in travel costs and often delays missions.” 

    So, Mr. Phelan, these kinds of extra costs and delays to fly contractors to the Pacific to fix minor repairs, are they an efficient use of taxpayer dollars? 

    Mr. John C. Phelan, nominee for Secretary of the Navy: Does not sound like it to me, Senator.  

    Senator Warren: I’m glad to hear that. Let me give you another example. The Government Accountability Office found that fuel tank level indicators were improperly calibrated on the USS Fort Lauderdale built by Huntington Ingalls. Now, it seems like an easy fix, right? You just go in and recalibrate these things. Uh uh. The Navy’s technicians were denied the information they needed to do that so every time they had to recalibrate the indicators, the Navy had to fly out one of the contractor’s technicians. 

    Mr. Phelan, does not being able to maintain important ship parts put the Navy’s readiness at risk? 

    Mr. Phelan: It sounds like it, Senator. And I think, as I mentioned earlier, these contracts are something that really need to be reviewed and better understood. And I think that, if confirmed, that is something I intend to do, is focus on that. 

    Senator Warren: And I appreciate that Mr. Phelan. But I want to see more than just reviewed here. Sailors need to be able to rely on their equipment. That means being able to maintain their own equipment. But, from fiber-optic navigation lights to cranes that deploy search and rescue boats, sailors do not have the right to repair their own equipment thanks to defense contractors who want to squeeze more money out of the military. Many people on this committee, both sides, Democrats and Republicans, understand the risk here. Chairman Wicker released a report last year showing DoD “consistently underperforms in procuring data rights,” and pointed to the lack of technical data as a factor that “inevitably leads to reduced training and readiness.” 

    Mr. Phelan, can we count on you to advance the Navy’s right to repair its own equipment? 

    Mr. Phelan: Thank you for the question, Senator. I know this is an issue very important to you. As I said, it is something that I intend to study and look at. What I’d commit to you is let me come back to you and look at this and understand it because it is a complicated issue. I am in agreement with – a lot of the examples you have given do not make sense to me but I am not up to speed enough yet to give you that answer. But I will come back and see you and commit to that and look at this. 

    Senator Warren: And I appreciate that, but I just want to say right now: this makes me uneasy. Because, there is so much pressure to continue to let these defense contractors take advantage of our service members. 

    We waste taxpayer dollars, delay missions. We actually put people at risk because we are not permitting basic right to repair. Technical data needs to be a “must have” in acquisition contracts for the Navy. My Servicemembers Right to Repair Act would make sure that the Navy and every other part of our military have fair access to the data rights and to the other materials that servicemembers need to be able to repair their own equipment and keep themselves safe. Military right-to-repair has bipartisan support here in the Senate. I want to work with the administration, I want to work with my colleagues, and I want to work with you. We owe it to our taxpayers and we owe it to the men and women in the field to get this straightened out. What’s happening right now is fundamentally wrong and we can put a stop to it. I apologize for going over, Mr. Chairman. 

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Warren, Duckworth Raise Concerns Over Potential Quid Quo Pro between Elon Musk and Dr. Troy Meink, Trump’s Air Force Secretary Nominee

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Massachusetts – Elizabeth Warren

    February 27, 2025

    Reports Indicate Musk Pushed for Meink for Key Role after Meink Favored SpaceX Contract

    “These reports raise concerns about your ability, if confirmed as Secretary, to treat contractors fairly and prioritize the Air Force’s mission over Elon Musk’s business interests.

    Text of Letter (PDF)

    Washington, D.C. – Today, U.S. Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Tammy Duckworth (D-Ill.), members of the Senate Armed Services Committee, sent a letter to Dr. Troy Meink, nominee for Secretary of the Air Force, following troubling reports that Elon Musk “pushed for” and “recommended” Dr. Meink’s nomination to serve as Secretary of the Air Force after Meink favored SpaceX in a contracting deal while at the National Reconnaissance Organization.

    If Dr. Meink is confirmed to be Secretary of the Air Force, he would be responsible for key contracting, deployment, and acquisition decisions. He would also make decisions about the role of key automated technologies and space programs, mixed-use unmanned aerial vehicles, artificial intelligence, and key space programs, crucially “oversee(ing) lucrative contracts for critical space efforts where top Trump ally Elon Musk’s SpaceX dominates.” All of these decisions may have a direct impact on SpaceX, Mr. Musk’s aerospace company, and other companies owned by him.

    Reporting from Reuters suggests Dr. Meink showed favoritism towards SpaceX during his time at the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO). Space X was reportedly able to secure $2.5 billion in federal contracts while blocking bids from competitors—through a last-minute alteration Dr. Meink made to the NRO contract. When L3Harris Technologies raised concerns about changes to the contract, Dr. Meink allegedly threatened the company, saying “future business with the agency could be hurt if it filed a formal protest.”

    “SpaceX’s monopoly over NRO contracts has created a situation where ‘SpaceX is building hundreds of the satellites for the spy agency and then putting them into orbit on its own rocket,’ wrote the senators. “This type of vertical integration can ‘culminate in a de facto monopoly, cementing a stagnant and wasteful anticompetitive paradigm.’”

    “These are incredibly serious allegations of misconduct and favoritism,” the senators continued. “These reports raise concerns about your ability, if confirmed as Secretary, to treat contractors fairly and prioritize the Air Force’s mission over Elon Musk’s business interests.”

    The senators demanded answers to their concerns about his previous contracting decisions, the nature of his relationship with Mr. Musk, and his plans to engage in future contracting decisions at the Pentagon, if confirmed, by March 6, 2025. 

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: King, Secretary of the Navy Nominee Discuss What Shipbuilders Can Learn from Private Sector

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Maine Angus King

    To watch or download the exchange, click here

    WASHINGTON, D.C.—Today, U.S. Senator Angus King (I-ME) and the nominee for Secretary of the Navy discussed utilizing lessons from the private sector to maintain best practices for ship designing, building, and maintenance. In a hearing of the Senate Armed Services Committee (SASC), King pressed the Trump Administration’s nominee, John Phelan, on his plans to benchmark Navy ships against private sector companies. To make the armed services more efficient. Later in their exchange, Senator King invited the nominee, if confirmed, to visit Maine’s shipyards – Bath Iron Works and Portsmouth Naval Shipyard – to get a better understanding of workforce needs like child care and available employee parking.

    King began, “I love your focus on maintenance. I have a half facetious, half serious suggestion. We should benchmark our availability of our ships against … cruise lines. If they had the low availability we have, they would be out of business a long time ago. You understand that when you have an enormous capital asset it should be used. Every minute that it is not used is penalizing the taxpayers and diminishing the effectiveness of the Navy. I hope that you will really focus on that and I would like to see the metrics over a period of years of time in dry dock versus availability. I take it that is going to be a significant focus of your work?”

    Thank you for the question, Senator King. I did enjoy our time together,” Phelan responded. “I jokingly say President Trump has texted me numerous times very late at night, sometimes after 1:00 in the morning, of rusty ships, or ships in a yard, asking me what I’m doing about it. And I told him I’m not confirmed yet and have not been able to do anything about it but I will be very focused on it. I view it as a critical issue and I think your idea about benchmarking versus some of the other private sector companies is a very good idea and understanding how they keep these things running is very important. I know under a prior secretary before they used Southwest Airlines to come in to help with our planes and getting more efficient. There are a lot of best practices to be shared across the two and I am hoping with my relationships and contacts in the private sector we should be able to do that.”

    King responded, “I loved it when you said we’ve never done it before it is not a sufficient excuse. You’ve got to be looking forward and not backward.” 

    King then followed up on the conversation to invite Phelan to Maine and highlight the workforce issues affecting Maine’s shipyards.

    King continued to share, “By the way, I want to invite you to the ill-named Portsmouth Naval Shipyard, and to Bath Iron Works where the DDGs are built. In our legislation, we talked about fostering a collaborative relationship between the Navy and the two major shipyards that build DDGs on the DDX design so it is buildable. One of the problems is that design is separated and then you go to build it and it is very expensive. I hope you will commit to continuing that collaborative relationship and stepping it up because I understand it has faltered to some extent.”

    Thank you for the question. If confirmed, I look forward to visiting Maine and New Hampshire with you.  I’ve been trying to spend time understanding how the whole process works. I read a book about how the B-2 bombers were designed by 12 people and I believe when I met with Senator Ernst she mentioned that on one ship we had 800 people designing a ship. I don’t know how you build something with 800 people. It just adds to requirements,” Phelan responded.

    King concluded, “Collaboration between the Navy and ship builders would bear fruit for the taxpayers as well as the buildability of the ship. Workforce and shipbuilding I wanted to talk about. Believe it or not, parking and childcare are issues in the workforce and that doesn’t sound like it would be a Navy project to build a parking garage or a childcare center, but that is absolutely necessary in order to maintain the workforce in shipbuilding in the economy we are in today.”

    As a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, Senator King has championed funding for both Bath Iron Works (BIW) and Portsmouth Naval Shipyard (PNSY). Last year, he strongly urged Mr. Frederick J. Stefany, Acting Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Research, Development and Acquisition to prioritize long-term investments in the defense industrial base – including Bath Iron Works—to avoid a ‘trough’ between contracted work, resulting in a likely loss of workers and threatening American national security. In the Senate passed FY2025 National Defense Authorization Act, Senator King secured authorization for the procurement of an addition DDG-51 Arleigh Burke-class destroyer that Bath Iron Works will build.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Federal Court Finds Firing of Probationary Federal Employees

    Source: American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees Union

    Judge Alsup calls probationary federal employees “the lifeblood of our government”

    SAN FRANCISCO – Today, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, presided over by Judge William H. Alsup, granted a temporary restraining order against the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) and its Acting Director, Charles Ezell, finding the termination of probationary federal employees illegal because OPM had no authority to order it. Judge Alsup said that when federal agencies fire employees for no reason, “that’s just not right in our country,” adding that we can’t “run our agencies with lies.” “The Office of Personnel Management does not have any authority whatsoever under any statute in the history of the universe to hire and fire employees at another agency,” he stated.

    The judge ordered OPM to immediately notify federal agencies of the ruling, including the Department of Defense, which is poised to terminate thousands of probationary employees tomorrow.Judge Alsup further ordered the federal government to disclose by Tuesday the participants on the February 13 call that has been widely reported to have been the occasion which which OPM ordered the agencies to terminate probationary employees. He indicated that a longer written order would follow shortly on the heels of today’s ruling from the bench.

    The plaintiffs had the following responses to the decision:

    “This ruling by Judge Alsup is an important initial victory for patriotic Americans across this country who were illegally fired from their jobs by an agency that had no authority to do so,” said Everett Kelley, National President of the American Federation of Government Employees. “These are rank-and-file workers who joined the federal government to make a difference in their communities, only to be suddenly terminated due to this administration’s disdain for federal employees and desire to privatize their work. OPM’s direction to agencies to engage in the indiscriminate firing of federal probationary employees is illegal, plain and simple, and our union will keep fighting until we put a stop to these demoralizing and damaging attacks on our civil service once and for all.”

    “We know this decision is just a first step, but it gives federal employees a respite. While they work to protect public health and safety, federal workers have faced constant harassment from unelected billionaires and anti-union extremists whose only goal is to give themselves massive tax breaks at the expense of working people. We will continue to move this case forward with our partners until federal workers are protected against these baseless terminations,” said AFSCME President Lee Saunders.

    “This decision by Judge Alsup is a major win for Main Street. The mass firings of Small Business Administration employees creates uncertainty for time-strapped entrepreneurs. Chaos is the enemy and this ruling brings a little bit more peace of mind to small business owners that keep our economy going,” said Richard Trent, Executive Director for the Main Street Alliance.

    “This ruling is a win for National Park Service employees who have been wrongfully fired across the country,” said Phil Francis, Chair of the Executive Council of the Coalition to Protect America’s National Parks. “NPS employees are dedicated to protecting the irreplaceable resources and stories found at over 430 units of the National Park System. Without our park rangers, our national parks – and the ability of Americans to safely visit them – are at risk. We applaud today’s ruling and we look forward to continuing the work to ensure our parks and people are protected.”

    “The recent mass layoffs have disproportionately affected Veterans, leading to job losses and increased uncertainty. This ruling is a win for the Veterans who have been impacted and rely on federal employment for stability, and these cuts have disrupted their livelihoods,”  said VoteVets Action Fund Chairman Major General (Ret.) Paul Eaton.

    “The rule of law applies to everyone, including presidential administrations,” said Erik Molvar, Executive Director of Western Watersheds Project. “Federal land and wildlife agencies need staff to enforce environmental protection regulations and keep an eye on western public lands, so we are pleased that the courts have struck down these illegal firings.”

    “This is a win for the thousands of public servants who keep our country running, for veterans and their families who rely on the Department of Veterans Affairs and other agencies, and for the millions of Americans who depend on critical government services,” said Jose Vasquez, Executive Director of Common Defense. “The court’s decision stops a blatant power grab that threatened to gut essential services, from veterans’ healthcare to disaster relief. Today, justice prevailed, but our fight continues to ensure no administration can ever again play politics with the livelihoods of those who serve our country and our communities.”

    “The law is clear that OPM has no authority to order the federal agencies to fire their employees. Today’s ruling is an important first step in holding this administration accountable for these unlawful acts,” said Danielle Leonard, Altshuler Berzon, representing the plaintiffs.

    “Today’s decision is an important victory for the rights of federal workers. The work done by the plaintiffs, led by public service unions along with small business, veterans, and conservation organizations, has been extraordinary and tireless,” said Norm Eisen, executive chair of State Democracy Defenders Fund. “Together, we’re going to keep holding this administration accountable whenever and wherever they try to undermine the rights of the people of the United States under the cynical guise of reform.”

    MIL OSI USA News