Category: Natural Disasters

  • MIL-OSI Security: Stephenville — Update: Additional charges laid by RCMP NL as part of attempt murder investigation in Port au Port

    Source: Royal Canadian Mounted Police

    Additional charges have been laid by RCMP NL’s Major Crime Unit (MCU) against 66-year-old Wayne Harold Hynes of Port au Port West.

    Hynes was charged with attempted murder on March 17, 2025, in relation to an incident that occurred in Port au Port on February 21, 2025. A snowmobiler was shot while traveling across Gravel’s Pond and was left with life-threatening injuries.

    In continuing with the investigation, yesterday, RCMP NL’s (MCU) laid the following additional criminal charges against Hynes:

    • Using a firearm in the commission of a criminal offence
    • Careless use of a firearm
    • Pointing a firearm
    • Discharging a firearm with intent to endanger the life of an individual
    • Assault with a weapon
    • Aggravated assault

    Hynes remains in custody at this time. His next court appearance will take place on March 31, 2025.

    The investigation is continuing.

    Background:

    https://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/en/news/2025/rcmp-nls-mcu-searches-home-port-au-port-part-injured-snowmobiler-investigation

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Security: Orange County Man Pleads Guilty To Mail Theft And Firearm Offense

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    Orlando, FL – Acting United States Attorney Sara C. Sweeney announces that Ryan Anthony Aheran (28, Orlando) has pleaded guilty to mail theft and possessing a firearm as a convicted felon. Aheran faces a maximum penalty of 15 years in federal prison for the firearm offense and up to five years’ imprisonment for the mail theft offense. Ahearn has also agreed to forfeit the firearm and ammunition used in the commission of the offense. A sentencing date has not yet been set.

    According to the plea agreement, on October 1, 2024, Aheran stole more than 1,000 pieces of mail from a U.S. Postal Service mailbox in Orlando. He was arrested on October 25, 2024, on a criminal complaint related to that mail theft incident. In connection with his arrest, Ahearn was observed carrying a black bag, in which law enforcement later located a loaded firearm, cash, mail addressed to others, and a debit card in Aheran’s name. At the time, Aheran had multiple prior felony convictions, including burglary of a conveyance, possession of more than 20 grams of cannabis, and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. As such, he is prohibited from possessing a firearm or ammunition under federal law.

    This case was investigated by the United States Postal Inspection Service, with assistance from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and the Orange County Sheriff’s Office. It is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Megan Testerman.

    This case is part of Project Safe Neighborhoods (PSN), a program bringing together all levels of law enforcement and the communities they serve to reduce violent crime and gun violence, and to make our neighborhoods safer for everyone.  On May 26, 2021, the Department launched a violent crime reduction strategy strengthening PSN based on these core principles: fostering trust and legitimacy in our communities, supporting community-based organizations that help prevent violence from occurring in the first place, setting focused and strategic enforcement priorities, and measuring the results.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Security: Tampa Man Arrested For Robbing Gas Station With A Firearm

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    Tampa, FL – Acting United States Attorney Sara C. Sweeney announces the arrest and filing of a criminal complaint charging Rafael Jimenez (30, Tampa) with one count of Hobbs Act robbery. If convicted, Jimenez faces up to 20 years in federal prison.

    According to the complaint, on March 8, 2025, Jimenez entered a gas station in Tampa and brandished a firearm while demanding money from the register. Shortly after making this demand, Jimenez fired a shot in the direction of the clerk, striking the ground directly behind the clerk.

    Jimenez stole more than $600 from the store as well as cigarettes. He was apprehended after surveillance footage from days before the robbery showed physical similarities between Jimenez and the robber, including a distinctive tattoo. Evidence found in Jimenez’s trash outside his home included a ski mask, gloves, and cigarettes of the same brand the robber had used. Surveillance video from nearby businesses showed a vehicle like Jimenez’s traveling on roads close to the scene of the robbery before and after it occurred.

    This case is being investigated by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and the Hillsborough County Sheriff’s Office. It will be prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Samantha Newman.

    A complaint is merely a formal charge that a defendant has committed one or more violations of federal criminal law, and every defendant is presumed innocent unless, and until, proven guilty.          

    This case is part of Operation Take Back America, a nationwide initiative that marshals the full resources of the Department of Justice to repel the invasion of illegal immigration, achieve the total elimination of cartels and transnational criminal organizations (TCOs), and protect our communities from the perpetrators of violent crime. Operation Take Back America streamlines efforts and resources from the Department’s Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Forces (OCDETFs) and Project Safe Neighborhoods (PSN).

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: We must have enduring peace in Ukraine, which ensures Ukraine’s future security and upholds the UN Charter: UK statement at the UN Security Council

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Speech

    We must have enduring peace in Ukraine, which ensures Ukraine’s future security and upholds the UN Charter: UK statement at the UN Security Council

    Statement by Ambassador James Kariuki, UK Deputy Permanent Representative to the UN, at the UN Security Council meeting on Ukraine.

    I would like to start by thanking Assistant Secretary-General Joyce Msuya for the briefing today.

    Colleagues, last month marked three years since President Putin launched his illegal and unprovoked full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

    The invasion displaced over 10 million people. Today, 12.7 million remain in need of urgent humanitarian support.

    The suffering caused by Russian forces is well known to this Council: war crimes, torture of civilians and prisoners of war, mass killings, the forced deportation of thousands of children, the forced cleansing and Russification of areas under their illegal control.

    It is a shocking record for any state, let alone a Permanent Member of the Security Council.

    In recent weeks, Russian drone and missile attacks have intensified nationwide, with daily reports of damage to residential areas and civilian infrastructure across multiple Oblasts.

    According to the UN Human Rights Monitoring Mechanism of Ukraine, in one attack which took place on 7 March, two ballistic missiles hit a residential area in Donetsk Oblast killing 11 people and destroying homes. 

    Emergency responders who arrived to treat the wounded were then targeted by further strikes.

    This has to stop. 

    The UK is clear that we want to see an end to the fighting and to the killing. We must have enduring peace in Ukraine.

    Putin could bring about peace tomorrow by withdrawing his forces and ending his illegal invasion.

    President, we welcome US efforts towards just and lasting peace. And we welcome President Zelenskyy’s clear commitment to peace and readiness to move quickly towards a comprehensive and lasting settlement. 

    In agreeing to a full, immediate and unconditional ceasefire, Ukraine has shown that it is the party of peace.  

    Russia must now agree to this without further delay.

    Ukraine’s humanitarian needs are immense, and the UK will continue to do what we can in support. 

    To date, we have committed £477 million in humanitarian support to Ukraine, providing its people with food, water, shelter, and medical care, alongside support to safeguard the rights, dignity, and well-being of civilians.

    We repeat our call on Russia to end its brutal war, withdraw from Ukrainian territory within its internationally recognised borders. 

    Until that day comes, the UK will continue to work with Ukraine and our international partners to achieve a just and lasting peace, which ensures Ukraine’s future security and upholds the core principles of the United Nations Charter.

    Updates to this page

    Published 26 March 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Meeting held at Palazzo Chigi ahead of tomorrow’s Summit on peace and security for Ukraine

    Source: Government of Italy (English)

    The President of the Council of Ministers, Giorgia Meloni, convened a meeting at Palazzo Chigi this morning, ahead of her participation in tomorrow’s meeting on peace and security for Ukraine to be held in Paris.

    This morning’s meeting was attended by the Vice-President of the Council of Ministers and Minister of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation, Antonio Tajani (via video link), the Vice-President of the Council of Ministers and Minister of Infrastructure and Transport, Matteo Salvini, and the Minister of Defence, Guido Crosetto.

    The meeting reaffirmed the commitment to building solid and effective security guarantees for Ukraine that are grounded in the Euro-Atlantic context, together with European and Western partners and the United States, also based on a model that can partly reflect the provisions of Article 5 of the Washington Treaty, with this proposal attracting growing interest among international partners.

    The meeting also provided an opportunity to reiterate that there are no plans for Italy to participate in a possible military force on the ground.

    Lastly, the issue of implementing and monitoring a ceasefire was also discussed, in relation to which a possible United Nations role is emerging, which the Italian Government has long supported.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Security: Muncie Drug Trafficking Ring Dismantled, Six Sentenced to a Combined 87 Years in Federal Prison

    Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) State Crime News

    INDIANAPOLIS— Five defendants have been sentenced to a total of 70 years in federal prison for their roles in a large methamphetamine, cocaine, and fentanyl trafficking conspiracy. The sentences were imposed by U.S. District Judge Richard L. Young. The defendants plead guilty and were sentenced as follows:

    Defendant Charge(s) Sentence
    Jamarr Hill, 30, Muncie Conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute controlled substances, money laundering,  and conspiracy to make a false statement in connection with purchasing a firearm 17 years’ imprisonment, 5 years supervised release.
    Terry Hill, 49, Muncie Conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute 500 grams or more of cocaine 5 years’ imprisonment, time served, 5 years’ supervised release.
    Lance McGee, 32, Muncie Conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute controlled substances 15 years’ imprisonment, 5 years supervised release.
    Nakevius Shannon, 33, Muncie Making a false statement in connection with purchasing a firearm 3 years’ probation

    According to court documents, between May and November of 2022, Jamarr Hill, Lance McGee, Terry Hill, and others conspired together to distribute controlled substances including cocaine, methamphetamine, and fentanyl.

    Jamarr Hill acted as the ringleader for the conspiracy, obtaining large quantities of drugs from Rodolfo Silva in San Diego, California for redistribution in Muncie. Terry Hill and Lance McGee served as distributors, dealing the drugs into communities in Muncie and elsewhere in central Indiana.

    On November 12, 2022, Nakevius Shannon purchased two firearms from Rural King, a federally licensed firearms dealer, completing an ATF Form 4473 in connection with the purchase. At the time Shannon completed the Form 4473, he falsely stated on the form that he was the intended transferee/buyer of handguns, when in fact, he purchased the firearms for Jamar Hill in order to further Hill’s drug trafficking conspiracy.

    In total, the defendants obtained and distributed no less than 2,004 grams of fentanyl, 10 kilograms of cocaine, and 203 pounds of methamphetamine.

    As part of the investigation, two other defendants were charged and have been sentenced. Joseph Haskins, of Muncie, Indiana, was charged in August 2021 with possession with intent to distribute 50 grams or more of methamphetamine. After a two-day trial in December 2023, Haskins was sentenced as a career offender to 33 years’ imprisonment and 5 years of supervised release. Rodolfo Silva was charged in 2024 in the Southern District of California with conspiracy to distribute controlled substances. Silva plead guilty and was sentenced to 17 years’ and 6 months’ imprisonment.

    “Drug traffickers like these defendants, responsible for pushing poison from across the country into our neighborhoods, must be held accountable for the suffering they cause in search of quick profits,” said John E. Childress, Acting United States Attorney for the Southern District of Indiana. This case is an outstanding example of the impact we can have with the help of our state and local law enforcement partners. I commend the efforts of the FBI, and the Muncie and Anderson Police Departments to make our communities safer by getting drugs and drug dealers off our streets.”

    “This is a significant victory in the ongoing efforts to target and dismantle drug trafficking organizations that send a flow of illegal drugs into our communities and threaten public safety,” said FBI Indianapolis Special Agent in Charge Herbert J. Stapleton. “The FBI will continue to work with our law enforcement partners to ensure every available resource is used to disrupt these criminal enterprises and hold those responsible accountable.”

    The FBI, IRS, Muncie Police Department, Anderson Police Department, and Fishers Police Department investigated this case. 

    Acting U.S. Attorney Childress thanked Assistant U.S. Attorneys Lindsay Karwoski and Barry Glickman, who prosecuted this case.

    This case was part of an Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Force (OCDETF) investigation. OCDETF identifies, disrupts, and dismantles the highest-level drug traffickers, money launderers, gangs, and transnational criminal organizations that threaten the United States by using a prosecutor-led, intelligence-driven, multi-agency approach that leverages the strengths of federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies against criminal networks.

    ###

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Security: Crownpoint Man Faces Federal Charges for Assaulting Tribal Police Officer

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    ALBUQUERQUE – A Crownpoint man is facing charges in federal court for allegedly assaulting a Navajo Police Department officer and escaping twice before being recaptured.

    According to court documents, on March 18, 2025, two Navajo Police Department officers were dispatched to a domestic violence call. When the officers arrived on the scene, Jason Thompson, 39, an enrolled member of the Navajo Nation, was already in handcuffs but he managed to escape and run away from the officers while still handcuffed.

    During the ensuing struggle to regain control, one officer deployed a department-issued taser on Thompson. Thompson then grabbed the taser and fired it at the officer, striking him in the chest. After Thompson was recaptured and placed in an NPD unit, he escaped again by removing the rear window bars and kicking out the window.

    Thompson was apprehended later that night by the NPD.

    Thompson is charged with assault with a dangerous weapon and will remain in custody pending trial, which has not been set. If convicted of the current charges, Thompson faces up to 10 years in prison.

    Acting U.S. Attorney Holland S. Kastrin and Raul Bujanda, Special Agent in Charge of the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Albuquerque Field Office, made the announcement today.

    The Gallup Resident Agency of the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Albuquerque Field Office investigated this case with assistance from the Navajo Police Department and Navajo Department of Criminal Investigations. Assistant U.S. Attorney Mark A. Probasco is prosecuting the case.

    A criminal complaint is merely an allegation. All defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Global: Trump’s purported ‘Art of the Deal’ negotiating skills aren’t likely to end the Russia-Ukraine war

    Source: The Conversation – Canada – By Anton Oleinik, Professor of Sociology, Memorial University of Newfoundland

    The White House says Russia and Ukraine have agreed to a ceasefire in the Black Sea, with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy asserting the truce was effective immediately while also accusing Russia of lying about the deal’s terms.

    Needless to say, it’s far from clear that United States President Donald Trump’s supposed “Art of the Deal” negotiating skills are enough to broker sustainable peace between Russia and Ukraine given the protagonists’ unwillingness to make concessions and the volatile nature of attempts to broker a peace agreement.

    The war waged by Russia has reached the stage where both Russian and Ukrainian officials fear losing face if they make concessions.

    Both view their enemy as an existential threat. Russian President Vladimir Putin has argued Russian defeat would spell “the end of the 1,000-year history of the Russian state,” while Zelenskyy says Russia’s protracted assault is an overt existential threat and the absence of U.S. support threatens the very survival of his country.

    Both sides have seemed prepared to fight until the bitter end. The involvement of a mediator in the form of the United States, therefore, could potentially change the deadly dynamics of the conflict.

    ‘Love to beat them’

    Trump declares being up to this formidable task. He positions himself as a mediator occupying a middle ground between the protagonists, unlike his predecessor in the Oval Office who supported Ukraine.

    In his ghost-written book The Art of the Deal, Trump claimed to enjoy these sorts of challenges:

    “In New York real estate… you are dealing with some of the sharpest, toughest, and most vicious people in the world… I happen to love to go up against these guys, and I love to beat them.”

    But if mediators, including Trump, are to successfully persuade opposing sides to make a deal, they need to properly understand each side’s motives. To what extent is each side malleable so some common ground can be found? Making a deal always requires compromises and concessions.

    Trump is well aware of this, saying recently of any prospective Russia-Ukraine agreement: “You’re going to have to always make compromises. You can’t do any deals without compromises.”

    Understanding motivations

    David McClelland’s theory of human motivation may be relevant in terms of attempts to broker peace between Ukraine and Russia. The social psychologist argued that three motives — the need for achievement, the need for affiliation and the need for power — explains most human behaviour:

    1. The need for achievement explains the desire to be productive and get results;
    2. Concern about establishing, maintaining or restoring a positive relationship with another person or people underpins the need for affiliation;
    3. The will to dominate, to have an impact on another person or people, is the essence of the need for power.

    McClelland predicted that when the need for power significantly exceeds the need for affiliation, conflicts and wars are likely. He viewed a high “power-minus-affiliation” gap as indicative of what he called the “imperial power motive syndrome.”




    Read more:
    Too much power can do very odd things to a leader’s head


    The metaphor of an empire lies at its origin. The empire’s declared mission is to enlighten, civilize and bring order to its subjects. Leaders with the imperial power motive syndrome show reformist zeal to save others, whether they like it or not.

    The social psychologist Robert Hogenraad subsequently adapted McClelland’s theory for computer-assisted content analysis by developing dictionaries of the three needs.

    If the words associated with the need for power — control, domination, victory, for example — occur more often in a text, speech or news reports than words associated with the need for affiliation — like love, family, friends — then the speaker has the imperial power motive syndrome.

    Hawks vs. doves

    My recently published analysis of war-related speeches delivered by Russian, Ukrainian, American, British and French leaders during the three years of Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine gives some clues about the motivations of the parties involved.

    Compared with their western counterparts, Putin and Zelenskyy exhibit the strongest imperial power motive syndrome and are “hawks.” Their need for power, as expressed through their public speeches, significantly exceeds their need for affiliation. Trump, however, appears similar to that of his arch-rival, former president Joe Biden. Both are closer to the “dovish” end of the scale.

    The preliminary outcomes of talks on a potential ceasefire reveal the challenges faced by mediators.

    First, the talks being held in Saudi Arabia were bilateral, with American officials meeting separately with Russian and Ukrainian delegations, as opposed to trilteral.

    Second, no joint statement followed the talks, although it was widely expected.

    Third, the White House issued two separate statements, one on talks with Ukraine’s representatives and the other on discussions with Russia’s representatives.

    The Ukraine statement includes the commitment to continue the exchange of prisoners of war, the release of civilian detainees and the return of forcibly transferred Ukrainian children, whereas the statement on the talks with Russia does not mention any of this.

    This is despite the fact that the International Criminal Court has accused Putin of committing war crimes via the unlawful deportation of children.

    Trump’s antipathy toward Zelenskyy

    The prospects of a peace agreement is further complicated by the history of Trump’s attempts to broker deals in Ukraine.

    The war in Ukraine actually began in 2014 with the annexation of Crimea and a proxy war in Donbas. Trump was elected president two years later.

    His discourse about Ukraine did not differ significantly from Obama’s and Biden’s until his first impeachment in 2020 for soliciting “the interference of a foreign government, Ukraine, to benefit his re-election.”

    His call to Zelenskyy in July 2019 triggered the impeachment. He pushed for two investigations aimed at helping his re-election bid — one into Hunter Biden’s business dealings in Ukraine and another into the hack of Democratic National Committee servers in 2016 — in exchange for releasing about $400 million of military assistance already approved by Congress and inviting Zelenskyy to the White House at that time.

    During and after the first impeachment, Trump’s language on Ukraine significantly diverged from Obama’s and Biden’s. He began using words like “corruption,” “lies” and “hoax” in relation to Ukraine.

    Moving forward

    All this suggests that Trump’s first impeachment has had a lasting impact on his perception of Ukraine and its leader.

    And so in addition to dealing with two protagonists who are unwilling to make concessions, Trump as a mediator faces challenges related to his past.

    One protagonist, Zelenskyy, may unwittingly remind him of one of the darkest moments in his political career — his first impeachment. This fact should be kept in mind when trying to make sense of the treatment received by Zelenskyy during his most recent visit to the White House and Trump’s references to him as a “dictator.”

    To truly succeed in mediation, Trump must move forward, leaving biases and prejudices related to Ukraine and its leader in the past. But can he?

    Anton Oleinik does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. Trump’s purported ‘Art of the Deal’ negotiating skills aren’t likely to end the Russia-Ukraine war – https://theconversation.com/trumps-purported-art-of-the-deal-negotiating-skills-arent-likely-to-end-the-russia-ukraine-war-252666

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI United Nations: Yemen: Ten Years of War, a Lifetime of Loss 

    Source: United Nations 2

    Humanitarian Aid

    Marking a decade of war in Yemen, Othman Belbeisi, Regional Director for Middle East and North Africa at the UN International Organization for Migration (IOM), highlights the resilience of its people, the deepening humanitarian crisis, and the urgent need for global action.

    Ten years. That’s how long Yemenis have been putting their lives on hold – through airstrikes, through hunger, through loss. A decade of war has left Yemen’s infrastructure in ruins and its people exhausted. And yet, as the eleventh year begins, the world seems not to notice Yemen’s plight.

    Today, close to 20 million people in Yemen depend on aid to survive. Nearly five million remain displaced, pushed from one place to another by violence or disaster. The international community, once moved by the staggering images of war and suffering, has switched its focus to new emergencies. But for those who work in Yemen – and for those who live this crisis every day – the story is far from over.

    Ten years. That’s how long Yemenis have been putting their lives on hold – through airstrikes, through hunger, through loss. And yet, as the eleventh year begins, the world seems not to notice Yemen’s plight.

    No one feels this reality more deeply than our Yemeni colleagues, who have remained at their posts through it all to help their own people. Many have worked through airstrikes, instability, and loss, all while worrying about the safety of their families. Now, with rising tensions and deepening funding cuts, they fear for their jobs too. Unlike most of us, they don’t have the option to simply start over. They can’t rely on savings or opportunities elsewhere – their passport alone often determines how far their future can stretch.

    This is the daily reality in a country that, too often, is reduced to headlines about war. But Yemen is so much more than a crisis zone. It is a place of stunning landscapes, ancient cities, rich traditions, warm hospitality and the kind of food that stays in your memory long after you’ve left. But these aren’t the stories that make headlines. Instead, Yemenis are seen only through the lens of conflict and poverty. It’s time we remember the people behind the statistics.

    Like Basma, a mother from Al Hodeidah who was forced to flee with her children to Al Makha in search of safety and water. She used to walk for hours every day just to fill a few jerrycans. Her youngest child once fainted from thirst while waiting in the heat. For years, clean water was a dream until a recently completed water project finally brought some relief to her village.

    IOM Video | Yemen: Ten Years of Crisis and Why We Must Act Now

    Or Ibrahim, a 70-year-old man displaced by heavy floods in Ma’rib. When the waters swept through the settlement, he carried his adult son, who lives with a disability, on his back to safety. They lost everything – their shelter, belongings, and sense of stability – butIbrahim never complained. He focused only on finding help for his son. Now, they live in a temporary tent exposed to the elements, dependent on aid that may not arrive in time or at all.

    Or Mohammed, a young man from Ethiopia who crossed deserts and conflict zones with nothing but the hope of reaching a better life. He never made it to the Gulf. Instead, he found himself stranded in Yemen – detained, beaten, and left without food or shelter. By the time he reached IOM’s Migrant Response Point, he was weak, traumatized, and desperate to go home. The only option left was to register for voluntary return – a journey home that many others never get to take.

    Yemenis are not just victims, They are survivors, caregivers, builders, teachers, mothers, fathers, and children with hopes and ambitions like anyone else.

    These are just three among millions of lives caught in the margins of this protracted crisis. One of the poorest countries in the Arab world is getting poorer – not because of its people, but because the world is slowly turning its back. This war didn’t start yesterday, but its consequences grow heavier by the day. Yemenis are not to blame for what is happening in the world, and yet, they bear the weight of it all. They don’t need our pity – they need our solidarity. Let this be the year we turn empathy into action.

    As the international community gathers in conferences, makes pledges, and sets priorities, Yemen must not be left behind. Yemenis are not just victims. They are survivors, caregivers, builders, teachers, mothers, fathers, and children with hopes and ambitions like anyone else. But words alone will not keep people safe, fed, or sheltered. Don’t let these conversations remain just talk – Yemen needs action. To look away now would not just be a failure of diplomacy – it would be a failure of humanity.

    Originally published on IOM Blogs on 26 March 2025.

    MIL OSI United Nations News

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Sir Martyn Oliver’s speech to Parentkind

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Speech

    Sir Martyn Oliver’s speech to Parentkind

    Sir Martyn Oliver, Ofsted’s Chief Inspector, spoke to Parentkind on the role of parents in education.

    Thank you, thank you to Jason [Elsom, CEO, Parentkind] to everyone whether you’re in the room or online. It’s wonderful to be here, I want to thank Parentkind for the opportunity, and for all of the work they do. It’s always fantastic to speak directly to parents and carers. It’s so important that you are involved in the dialogue around education. That your voices, and the voices of your children are heard.

    I know from all my time as a teacher, a head, a multi-academy trust leader and now as His Majesty’s Chief Inspector at Ofsted, that education works best when children, families and schools all work together.

    Education is a team sport, and you need every member of the team to be pulling in the same direction.

    The power of education

    I saw this in my time as an art teacher, if you can believe it. I loved my job. I loved being able to see the impact that education can have on an individual child. You do all that you can to pass on knowledge and skills, but you also want to light a fire in children so they enjoy and keep learning throughout their lives. Teachers do this remarkable work every single day. But it’s in these roles that you also see the limitations of what can be achieved if something in the child’s home life isn’t working.

    My biggest fear as a headteacher wasn’t Ofsted nor was it the responsibility of the actual job itself, it was the fear that there may be or there will be a child in one of my schools whose needs were not being met and that they wouldn’t go on to have the remarkable impact on society that they could have had: a child not able to attend PE enrichment and misses out on a sport they may have excelled at and gone to represent the country in, or a child not taking the right exam option and not going to make a break-through discovery in that field. These are the real-world and long-lasting consequences to what happens in education.

    I saw it again when I became a head of sixth form. It was a wonderful role, helping to prepare young people for the world. But again, it only worked if the child and their family are also active participants in education and that progression.

    In my first school, I stayed and taught art for 7 years and I was really fortunate enough to be given a few classes who I could see through from Year 7 all the way through to taking the their GCSEs and the first A-level class in that school when they got to Year 12. Seeing one generation through the school from start to finish and working with both the children and their parents as they flourished at GCSE and then A-level art before going on to university and having really successful careers is incredibly powerful, and satisfying as a career. The open and honest relationship with parents was critical each and every step of the way.

    And I saw it as a headteacher. In that role, you’re working not just for the community within the school gates, but also the community outside those gates. You need to make sure that the children in the school are getting all the education and the opportunities that they can.

    But you also need to be heavily invested in what happens before they arrive and when they leave school at the end of the day. In some cases, you need to understand why they are not coming in the first place. You need to support the aspirations of children and also the aspirations of their parents and carers. And you need to make sure everyone gets to work together to support the development of every child.

    Beyond the individual

    Of course, we want all parents to be involved in their children’s learning. To read to them, and to read with them. To support them with homework. To challenge and encourage them. I’m sure all of you involved in Parentkind exemplify this.

    But what’s even more encouraging is when parents get involved in the life of the school itself. When they begin to help not only their child’s learning, but the learning of all children at that school, including those who may not have strong parental advocacy.

    We know that schools with strong parent engagement thrive and succeed. As Parentkind regularly point out, it has been linked to improvements in attendance, behaviour, and academic achievement.

    And PTAs are a fantastic way to do that, and I know many of you, here and online, are involved in that way. The same can be said for parent governors, again I know many of you have taken that route.

    I was lucky enough to work with some fantastic PTAs and governors – in my first year of teaching I joined my school’s PTA and by the second year, incredibly, I chaired the group! You can imagine the impact it had on me as a young teacher chairing a group which consisted of the headteacher and chair of governors. Yet again though, I saw the power of parents and the school working together – this time not for the benefit of any one child, but of all children in that community.

    But whether or not you join the PTA or the governing board, parents should understand what schools are doing and why they take the decisions they take. This requires active engagement from the parent, and active communication from the school. In loco parentis only works if the parents and teachers trust each other. It’s a two-way street.

    When it’s done right, when parents and carers really buy in to the school and its ethos, then they become part of a united community, working together.

    When the relationship breaks

    But of course, we have also heard a lot recently about what can happen when this relationship and community is not there. When there is breakdown of trust between parents and schools. Sometimes this results in friction, or even outright hostility between parents and school leaders.

    A survey of teachers called Teacher Tapp reported recently that over 40% of teachers and school leaders reported seeing negative online comments from parents about staff or their school since September.

    In another Teacher Tapp survey at the end of the last school year, 9% of teachers said they had been the subject of an allegation from a parent. Obviously, some of these are legitimate grievances, and parents should be able to raise concerns. But nearly 1 in 10 of teachers feels high to me.

    Other teacher representatives talk about abuse of teachers becoming more of a problem.

    This sort of relationship breakdown can be hard to recover from. Trust is not built overnight, and once it’s lost it can take months or even years to rebuild. But the only way to tackle that is more openness and transparency.

    We want to encourage parental engagement. Engagement in the right way, the way so many of you will be doing it.

    We know how social media has come to influence the dynamics of school communities – positively and negatively. It’s such a powerful tool, and it can be an amazing way to bring people together. But it can also hand a microphone to the pub bore, a megaphone to the bully and help the rabble rouser find his or her rabble without leaving their armchair.

    The world seems to be getting more antagonistic and adversarial. So, you can understand why a school leader might be wary of engaging with parents. But I always found that the way to defuse tensions, tackle rumours and build common purpose with parents is more communication, not less. More openness, not less. And more information sharing, not less. So, I say: join the PTA, don’t join the pile on!

    Because I know from my experience, it will be welcomed. And Parentkind’s survey backs this up too. You found that 85% of teachers agree that parental engagement in school life has benefits and 75% agree that it improves outcomes for young people.

    So I want Ofsted to play its part in better communication.

    Our new report cards

    I hope that our proposals for new report cards, to be introduced from November, will prove a game-changer.

    They are based on what we heard from parents in the Big Listen. You told us that you wanted a broad evaluative approach with clear reporting on what your child’s school or nursery or college is doing well and what it needs to work on.

    That’s exactly what we think we have designed. A report card that provides more detailed and nuanced information for you.

    Now I know some of you were happy with the old system. After all, the one-word overall judgement was praised for its simplicity. But that simplicity also frustrated many parents who wanted more detailed information – more tailored to the needs of their children.

    One-word judgements could also have unintended consequences. Where parents had a choice in schools – in cities and larger towns – the one-word judgement could lead to schools being over or under subscribed. This is frustrating for parents and potentially damaging for schools who could find their local reputation ‘locked’ for years, with a knock-on effect on everything from recruitment and retention of teachers, to local house prices.

    The changes we’re proposing will do things differently. We will report on a much wider range of areas. Things that matter, I hope, to you. Things like behaviour, achievement, attendance, teaching and the curriculum, leadership and governance, and inclusion – really looking in detail at how schools make sure their pupils all have a sense of belonging, especially those who are disadvantaged, vulnerable, or have special educational needs. For each area, you will be able to see a clear grade, and a description of what we found when we inspected the school.

    Report cards will help give a more balanced picture of schools. Because the best schools aren’t perfect and have areas where they could do better, and the schools which might be seen as ‘weaker’ will have aspects of their work that they do really well. In that way a school’s report card will be much closer to a child’s school report. Going back to my art teacher days, the one-word grade paints a monochrome picture of a school; and now we want to paint it in colour.

    Wouldn’t it be great if more balanced reporting, acknowledging both strengths and weaknesses, put paid to the idea that a school is seen as a 100% ‘success’ or a 100% ‘failure’. And instead parents had the information they needed to choose schools based on the specific things they thought were most important to their children.

    Somewhere with great standards of behaviour. Somewhere with exceptional support for children with special educational needs or disabilities. Somewhere which delivers great outcomes and achievements. Somewhere that really prioritises the wellbeing and personal development of its pupils. Parents and carers will be able to see how local schools perform on these. That might change the way schools are seen by their communities and change established patterns of school applications.

    But I know for many of you – particularly if you live outside of cities – there really isn’t much choice between schools. I still think more detailed information will really help you. You’ll be able to see what’s working well and what needs attention at your local school. And I believe this level of information will help inform a better, more constructive conversation between school leaders and their communities – to address some of those tensions I spoke about a few minutes ago.

    And we want to do more to encourage this constructive dialogue. As I said, we know that an engaged community leads to a better school. So, our proposals for inspecting the leadership and governance of a school talk explicitly about the need for leaders to ‘engage with and work effectively with parents and carers and the local community to support pupils’ achievement and well-being.’ – that’s a direct quote from our school inspection toolkit. I know that’s something that Parentkind has welcomed.

    Driving higher standards

    Above all, we hope this approach will drive ever higher standards for children. It will give schools an independent and expert assessment of what they’re doing well and where they could improve. It will validate, assure, and celebrate their hard work, and shine a light on how they can do even better.

    And it will help you, as parents, meaningfully engage with the school on the issues that need attention. Sometimes, it may validate your concerns, other times it may reassure you that an individual experience is not the norm.

    It will also help the government better target support where it is needed. By reporting specifically on topics like attendance or behaviour, we can help government decide when and where to provide expert assistance to those who need it most. And we also want to help schools – as well as nurseries and further education colleges – to see which of their peers are really blazing a trail, through our new exemplary grade. So, we will highlight some of the best national examples of where schools are doing something truly exceptional.

    Initial support from parents

    Of course, what I’ve set out today are our proposals, they are not set in stone. Our consultation on a new way of inspecting is open until 28th April and it’s on our website – ‘gov.uk/Ofsted’. Please, please read the proposals and give us every one of your views.

    I’m sure there are things that could be better. Things we could refine. But we are encouraged that parents seem to support the broad approach that we have set out.

    We recently commissioned independent research from YouGov. They polled parents on our proposed report cards and have just shared the results with us.

    Almost 7 out of 10 of the parents surveyed said they prefer the new-look report cards to our current inspection reports. Just 15% said they preferred the old system.

    And nearly 9 out of 10 parents said the report cards are easy to understand. 84% thought that the colour-coding we propose to use on the reports is helpful.

    And it’s worth adding that two thirds of parents said they support Ofsted continuing to grade schools. That is important, as grading does come in for some criticism – but parents are consistent: they told us in the Big Listen they wanted it and they’ve told us again in this new survey.

    It’s great to see this level of support. But obviously, we need a system that works for everyone. It needs to work for you as parents and, most importantly, it needs to work for children. But it also needs to work for those working in schools and nurseries and colleges.

    Sometimes that’s a balancing act. But I do not see the two as in opposition. After all, you and your children want happy teachers. You don’t want to see high turnover any more than leaders do. And you want schools to be able to focus on what really matters and provide the best possible education.

    So, we’ve tried to design a system that does just that. That drives higher standards for children, that improves reporting for you and enables engagement for you, and that reduces pressure on everyone working in education.

    Conclusion

    So, it’s really important that we capture parents’ opinions in the consultation. So, thank you for all of you who have already taken part – and thank you in advance if you plan to do so.

    And I’d like to end by recognising the incredible work so many of you do as PTA members, or parent governors. Thank you for supporting schools, for contributing to your communities, and for improving the education prospects not just of your own children, but of all the children in your neighbourhoods. So thank you for the work you do, it’s so important. It’s been a pleasure talking to you. Thank you.

    Updates to this page

    Published 26 March 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI Security: Two Members of Violent NE Philadelphia Drug Trafficking Organization Convicted of All Charges at Trial

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    Defendants Were Part of the Conspiracy That Led to the Killing of PPD Sgt. James O’Connor

    PHILADELPHIA – United States Attorney David Metcalf announced that Kelvin Jimenez, aka “Nip,” 34, and Dominique Parker, aka “Dom,” 33, both of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, were convicted late yesterday afternoon at trial of crimes arising from their membership in a violent drug trafficking organization known by several names, including “SG1700” and “L-Block,” which operated in the Frankford section of Northeast Philadelphia.

    As proven at trial, defendants Jimenez and Parker, as part of SG1700, sold large quantities of narcotics over a multi-year period, using violence and threats of violence to protect their reputation and drug territory. Both were convicted of all charges against them, including racketeering conspiracy, drug trafficking conspiracy, maintaining a drug-involved premises, assaults in aid of racketeering, firearms offenses, and related crimes. Jimenez was also convicted of the murder of Kaseem Rogers, and Parker of the murder of Dontae Walker.

    Jimenez and Parker, along with Hassan Elliott, aka “Haz,” 26, and Khalif Sears, aka “Leaf” and “Lil Leaf,” 23, both also of Philadelphia, were charged in March 2023 by superseding indictment with conspiracy to engage in a racketeer influenced corrupt organization (RICO), violent crimes in aid of racketeering, to include murder, stemming from the killings of victims Rogers, Walker, Tyrone Tyree, and Philadelphia Police Sergeant James O’Connor, and numerous related offenses.

    On March 13, 2020, Elliott, Sears, and others previously indicted were inside a stash house on the 1600 block of Bridge Street, when Sergeant O’Connor and other members of the Philadelphia Police Department SWAT team arrived with an arrest warrant for Elliott for the March 2019 murder of Tyrone Tyree. As Sergeant O’Connor and his fellow officers ascended the staircase to the second floor of the residence and repeatedly announced their presence, Elliott fired a semiautomatic assault rifle 16 times, striking and killing Sergeant O’Connor.

    Elliott and Sears pleaded guilty this January to RICO conspiracy, drug trafficking conspiracy, causing the death of Sergeant O’Connor by firearm, and multiple drug, gun, and violent offenses. Elliott is scheduled to be sentenced on April 29 and Sears on April 30; both face maximum possible sentences of life in prison.

    Jimenez is scheduled to be sentenced on July 7 and Parker on July 9; both also face maximum possible sentences of life in prison.

    “Jimenez and Parker led the gang that killed Sergeant James O’Connor. These defendants also committed murder themselves,” U.S. Attorney Metcalf said. “Today, however, the Department of Justice put an end to SG1700 and their campaign of violence and destruction. We cannot bring back the lives that have been lost. But we have sent an unambiguous message that everyone involved in a criminal organization that attacks our brave law enforcement officers will be held accountable through federal prosecution.”

    “By direction of these gang-leaders, Philadelphia’s Frankford neighborhood was subjected to deadly shootouts targeting rivals,” said Eric DeGree, Special Agent in Charge of the ATF’s Philadelphia Field Division. “This conviction brings some justice for the murder of Philadelphia Police Sergeant James O’Connor, for his family and colleagues, and for the three others murdered and more than a dozen wounded by this brutal criminal enterprise. Through our ATF agents’ hard work in cooperation with the Philadelphia Police Department, the U.S. Attorney’s Office successfully prosecuted this series of cases to take down this lethal enterprise and make Philadelphia’s streets safer.”

    The case was investigated by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and the Philadelphia Police Department and is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Ashley Martin, Christopher Diviny, and Lauren Stram. 

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Security: York County Man Sentenced to 217 Months in Prison for Armed Robbery and Discharging a Firearm in Furtherance of a Crime of Violence

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    HARRISBURG – The United States Attorney’s Office for the Middle District of Pennsylvania announced that Jose Diaz-Garcia, age 24, of York, Pennsylvania, was sentenced yesterday to 217 months in prison by U.S. District Judge Keli M. Neary for three counts of conspiracy to interfere with commerce by robbery and one count of discharging a firearm in furtherance of a crime of violence.

    According to Acting United States Attorney John C. Gurganus, Diaz-Garcia previously pleaded guilty to these offenses, which involved Diaz-Garcia’s armed robberies of the Smoke and Chill convenience store, the Family Dollar store, and Rod’s Corner Store in December 2021, during a 5-day crime spree in York County.  During each of these robberies, Diaz-Garcia pointed a loaded handgun at employees and took money by means of actual and threatened force, violence, and fear of injury. During the robbery at the Family Dollar on December 8, 2021, Diaz-Garcia discharged the firearm in the presence of store patrons and employees, and held the gun against an employee prior to robbing the store and fleeing to a nearby hotel.

    Judge Neary also ordered Diaz-Garcia to pay $4,601.58 in restitution to the businesses, and to serve 5 years of supervised release after he completes his prison sentence.

    This case is part of Operation Take Back America, a nationwide initiative that marshals the full resources of the Department of Justice to repel the invasion of illegal immigration, achieve the total elimination of cartels and transnational criminal organizations (TCOs), and protect our communities from the perpetrators of violent crime. Operation Take Back America streamlines efforts and resources from the Department’s Project Safe Neighborhood (PSN).

    The matter was investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the York City Police Department.  Assistant United States Attorney Christian Haugsby prosecuted the case.          

    # # #

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Global: Signal chat group affair: unprecedented security breach will seriously damage US international relations – expert view

    Source: The Conversation – UK – By Robert Dover, Professor of Intelligence and National Security & Dean of Faculty, University of Hull

    Plans for an attack against an enemy target are classified in America. But the private views of high-ranking officials about allies, communicated within government, must also count as intelligence to be protected.

    The recent communication of this category of information over the Signal messaging app has been dismissed by the US president, Donald Trump as a mere “glitch”. It is definitely that. But it also raises the prospect that in his first two months of office, key parts of the administration might have inadvertently been leaving sensitive information vulnerable to enemy interception. That would be one of the most serious intelligence breaches in modern history.

    National security advisor, Mike Waltz, has subsequently “taken responsibility” for the episode – but, so far at least, remains in post. Instead, the administration has decided to launch bitter ad hominem attacks against the journalist that revealed this breach of security, the editor-in-chief of The Atlantic, Jeffrey Goldberg.

    Storied national security reporter: The Atlantic’s editor-in-chief Jeffrey Goldberg.
    US Secretary of Defense

    Trump called Goldberg a “total sleazebag”, defense secretary Pete Hegseth referred to him as “deceitful and highly discredited”. Walz called him “the bottom scum of journalists”.

    The recent chat group reported exchange involved the adminstration’s most senior national security officials: Waltz, Hegseth, Vice-President J.D. Vance, secretary of state Marco Rubio and director of national intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, among others.

    As we know now, it also, accidentally, included Goldberg, himself a storied national security reporter before he took up the editorship of the Atlantic. It’s a national security blunder almost without parallel.

    Interestingly, some of the people on this chat were among those who savaged Hilary Clinton’s use of a personal email address during her time as secretary of state. This was controversial, but did not meet the standard for prosecution. Most of her work-related emails were archived into federal records by their recipients on government email. It was poor practice, and regulations were significantly tightened after.

    If an inquiry is set up about this most recent incident, it will be interesting to see whether these messages are treated as federal records. This would be signficant because the messages would need to be handed over to officials to classify and archive as part of the public record. That would certainly clear up whether this was indeed a “glitch” or whether classified information was indeed shared – something the administration still denies.


    Sign up to receive our weekly World Affairs Briefing newsletter from The Conversation UK. Every Thursday we’ll bring you expert analysis of the big stories in international relations.


    For such an elevated group of US government officials to use a consumer messaging app to talk business invites an easy win for enemy intelligence agencies. America’s key intelligence competitors invest billions of dollars in techniques and technologies to break the toughest encryption. For phone-based communications, we know that apps such as NSO Group’s Pegasus can be used to bypass the encryption on phones.

    The Guardian newspaper’s investigative work has highlighted how journalists and activists were targeted by countries using this technology and the interception capability of capable intelligence nations is far stronger. So the standard security induction to officials would cover communications, devices and protocols.

    It is not clear whether the protocols cover the use of emojis. Waltz’s use of a fist, fire and flag emoji is certainly unusual in diplomatic cables that have been aired publicly.

    Even worse, the communication between these officials was prior to a deployment of US military assets against an enemy target, the Houthi rebels in Yemen. This potentially placed the success of the operation and those assets at risk.

    That the Yemenis did not move assets that had been targeted does not conclusively prove that the communications remained safe. It has long been a practice to pick and choose when to risk revealing that communications are being intercepted.

    Zero accountability

    An ordinary intelligence officer who communicated about highly sensitive and classified deployments through a platform with security that is not accredited or controlled by the intelligence community, would certainly face disciplinary action. An officer who accidentally invited a journalist into this chat would be likely to face even stiffer sanctions. Trump seems to have rallied around his officials, however.

    The US has recent form in vigorously pursuing journalists who publish classified materials. The Edward Snowden leaks caused considerable damage to transatlantic intelligence and Snowden was forced to take up residence in Moscow to avoid prosecution.

    The newspapers who published his papers were subject to strong action from the governments in their countries. The publication of Chelsea Manning’s leaked cables – known as Cablegate – by Julian Assange and Wikileaks resulted in a lengthy process to try and prosecute Assange (Manning herself was prosecuted and was sentenced to 35 years in jail, serving seven).

    But instead, Trump has chosen to spearhead a backlash against The Atlantic – the “messenger”. It fits in with Trump’s antipathy towards the mainstream media and his strong preference for some social media outlets. It might also signal a more serious turn towards intolerance to investigative journalism.

    Diplomatic disaster

    What the Signal messages also reveal is a contempt for European allies among Trump’s most senior people. That will be difficult to repair. Describing allies who have lost thousands of soldiers supporting American foreign policy aims as “pathetic” and “freeloaders” will make it very difficult for those governments to underplay the significance of the comments.

    What we have seen in the Signal messages might herald a new era of diplomacy and policy making, by officials who are not afraid to break established patterns. What we can definitely say is that it is radically different to the diplomacy the rest of the west is used to, and it will be nearly impossible to unsee.

    The western allies will be accelerating their plans to be less dependent on the US – and this will be to America’s detriment.

    Robert Dover does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. Signal chat group affair: unprecedented security breach will seriously damage US international relations – expert view – https://theconversation.com/signal-chat-group-affair-unprecedented-security-breach-will-seriously-damage-us-international-relations-expert-view-253090

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: UK is absolutely committed to securing a just and lasting peace in Ukraine: UK Statement to the OSCE

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Speech

    UK is absolutely committed to securing a just and lasting peace in Ukraine: UK Statement to the OSCE

    Politico-Military Counsellor, Ankur Narayan, commends Ukraine as the party of peace for proposing a full, immediate and unconditional ceasefire – and urges Russia to agree to this without further delay.

    Thank you, Mr Chair. Our Helsinki Final Act commitments include sovereignty, territorial integrity and the non-violability of borders. As per the first line of the Helsinki Final Act, these principles are designed to protect “true and lasting peace” in our region. This is why we remain unwavering in our support for Ukraine defending its territorial integrity, its right to exist, its sovereignty, and its independence.  

    We welcome the progress President Trump has made towards a ceasefire in Ukraine and in negotiations with Russia and Ukraine. We are in close contact with US and Ukraine following the conclusion of talks in Riyadh yesterday. President Zelenskyy has already shown Ukraine is the party of peace by proposing a full, immediate and unconditional ceasefire.  We hope that President Putin will agree to this without further delay.  

    Any lasting peace must ensure Ukraine’s sovereignty and security – in line with the Helsinki Final Act and the UN Charter. With robust security arrangements to ensure Russia is never able to invade again. The UK will play its full part – and is already taking a leading role, alongside France, to build a coalition of the willing to support Ukraine’s future security.  

    Over the last week, Russia has continued to launch brutal attacks that cause daily suffering for innocent Ukrainians. The drone strike on Kyiv on March 23rd exemplifies another horrific assault, tragically killing a 5-year-old girl and severely injuring ten others. A Russian missile strike on Sumy in northeastern Ukraine injured 88 people, including 17 children. In Donetsk, Russian shelling over the past three days across the eastern Oblast province has resulted in the deaths of seven civilians. We must emphasise the need for accountability for these actions and renew our commitment to collaborating towards achieving enduring peace. 

    Mr Chair, we are absolutely committed to securing a just and lasting peace in Ukraine and are engaging with key allies in support of this effort. A just and lasting peace is vital for Ukraine and for wider Euro-Atlantic and international security and prosperity.

    Updates to this page

    Published 26 March 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI Security: Man to appear in court following investigation into homemade weapons

    Source: United Kingdom London Metropolitan Police

    A man is due to appear in court after being charged with 29 offences relating to possession of firearms and explosive substances.

    Sakhile Ntsele 18, (10.01.07) of Wandsworth Road, SW8 is due to appear at Inner London Crown Court on Friday, 28 March. His first appearance was at Highbury Corner Magistrates’ Court on Saturday, 29 October 2024. He has since been charged with 26 further offences.

    Ntsele was first charged on Saturday, 29 October 2024 with one charge of threatening a person with an offensive weapon and one charge of threats to kill.

    The charges relate to an investigation which was prompted by an incident at Ntsele’s home address on Sunday, 27 October 2024 which officers attended. He was arrested at the scene after a variety of homemade weapons were allegedly found.

    As part of the investigation, led by Trident Officers within Specialist Crime South, Ntsele was further charged with manufacture of a weapon on Friday, 8 November 2024.

    On Thursday, 13 March 2025, Ntsele was charged with 26 further offences – eight charges of possession of explosive substances with intent to endanger life, eight of making explosive substances for an unlawful purpose, five of possessing a firearm with intent to endanger life and five of possessing a firearm without a certificate.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI United Nations: Gaza: No aid has reached war-torn enclave for more than three weeks

    Source: United Nations 2

    Peace and Security

    It has now been three and a half weeks since Israel imposed a complete blockade on all aid into Gaza, despite daily efforts by UN humanitarians to secure fresh access, they said in an update from the shattered enclave.

    And as supplies of food, medicine and other supplies run low, aid teams are increasingly concerned about growing anxiety in bread lines outside the enclave’s remaining bakeries.

    “Most attempts by humanitarian organizations to coordinate access with Israeli authorities within #Gaza result in #AccessDenied,” the UN aid coordination office, OCHA, said in an online post.

    Five out of seven such attempts were denied on Monday and six out of nine were rejected on Tuesday, it explained.

    Hospitals need protection

    Medical teams in Gaza are also exhausted “and urgently need protection and reinforcement” from ongoing strikes across the Strip, the UN aid coordination office, OCHA, said on Wednesday.

    It cited new reports of attacks against health workers, ambulances and hospitals and warned of “hundreds of casualties, a severe drop in medical stocks and a lack of equipment, blood units and personnel” since the ceasefire ended.

    No one is safe. The world must have zero tolerance for atrocities,” the UN agency insisted.

    Nearly 800 Palestinians have been killed in Gaza in recent days following the resumption of Israeli bombardment on 18 March, according to the health authorities. This includes a reported 38 individuals killed in the last 24 hours.  

    In just the last week, eight aid workers have been killed in the enclave, bringing the total killed in Gaza to 399. That number includes at least 289 UN personnel, OCHA said, with staffers from the UN Office for Project Services (UNOPS) and the UN agency for Palestine refugees (UNRWA) killed last Wednesday in an apparent Israeli tank strike on a United Nations compound in Deir al-Balah that also seriously wounded six others. Israel denied responsibility for the attack.

    Three of those injured worked in support of the UN Mine Action Service (UNMAS) which is involved in clearing unexploded ordnance in Gaza.

    OCHA noted that on 20 March, the Israeli military re-deployed along the eastern and central part of the “Netzarim corridor” in Gaza. Movement between the north and south of Gaza was only allowed via the Al Rashid coast road.

    Evacuation order misery

    These military activities and new displacement orders issued by the Israeli military have triggered “new waves” of displacement across Gaza, with more than 142,000 people likely uprooted between 18 and 23 March, the UN aid office said.

    “Israeli evacuation orders have covered 55 square kilometres across six areas of the #Gaza Strip – nearly the size of Manhattan,” OCHA said in an online post.

    Around 15 per cent of the enclave has been impacted by evacuation orders – in addition to “no-go zones” that run along borders and in central Gaza.

    The Israeli Government’s decision to ban the entry of humanitarian aid and any other supplies via all land crossings into Gaza is the longest such closure since October 2023, OCHA added, warning that gains made during the ceasefire to support survivors “have been reversed”.

    To date, at least 50,000 Palestinians have been confirmed dead by local authorities with 113,828 wounded since the war erupted on 7 October 2023, in response to Hamas-led terror attacks on Israel that left more than 1,100 dead and more than 250 taken hostage. 

    MIL OSI United Nations News

  • MIL-OSI Global: Trump’s tariffs on Canada and Mexico could spell trouble for distilled spirits

    Source: The Conversation – USA – By Andrew Muhammad, Professor of Agriculture and Resource Economics, University of Tennessee

    If all the tariff drama in the news lately has you reaching for a stiff drink, you’re not alone. Unfortunately, those same tariffs might make it harder to get your hands on your favorite brand of tequila.

    In early March 2025, U.S. President Donald Trump levied import tariffs of 25% on goods from Canada and Mexico, following through on a promise he made back in November 2024. While he later partially reversed course, suspending tariffs on some goods, tensions remain high. Mexico is largely holding off on retaliation, but Canada quickly fired back with counter-tariffs on billions of dollars’ worth of U.S. products.

    These trade tensions spell trouble for numerous industries, including the booming spirits market. Canada and Mexico – two of the top U.S. trading partners – accounted for nearly half of the US$12 billion in distilled spirits the U.S. imported in 2024.

    As an agricultural economist, I’ve analyzed how a 25% tariff could affect tequila, whiskey and other distilled spirits – and the results weren’t pretty. I found that these tariffs would cost distilled spirit importers over $1 billion in lost trade, with tequila alone taking a more than $800 million hit.

    Americans’ thirst for imported liquor

    The U.S. imports far more distilled spirits than it exports – five times as much by value, as of 2024.

    Since 2000, U.S. imports of distilled spirits have surged by more than 300%, driven largely by the explosive rise in tequila consumption. Between 2000 and 2024, tequila imports rose by 1,400%, skyrocketing from $350 million to $5.4 billion.

    While imports of whiskey, liqueurs, vodka and brandy also grew, none matched tequila’s explosive rise. Tequila now represents 45% of all spirits imported into the U.S., up from 12% in 2000.

    Not surprisingly, 99% of tequila and mezcal is imported from Mexico, making it the leading foreign supplier of distilled spirits to the United States. Meanwhile, Canada has supplied between 4% and 6% of U.S. spirits imports over the past two decades, primarily whiskey and liqueurs.

    Since distilled spirits are classified as agricultural products, their rising imports have significantly contributed to the U.S. agricultural trade deficit. However, this isn’t necessarily a problem. Imports help meet demand from U.S. consumers, generate value-added opportunities for U.S. companies, and support economic activity in bars, liquor stores, restaurants and beyond.

    A 25% tariff on Mexican goods is a 25% tax on tequila

    In my study, published in February in the peer-reviewed journal Agribusiness and in a follow-up policy brief, I found that 25% tariffs on Mexico and Canada could reduce imports of distilled spirits by $1.2 billion. This loss exceeds the total amount of tax revenue those tariffs can expected to bring in.

    Unsurprisingly, tequila imports would be the hardest hit, falling by $810 million. I found that the tariff revenue from tequila – $910 million – could actually exceed the corresponding fall in imports. That’s because demand for tequila, like most alcoholic beverages, is what economists call “inelastic,” meaning that when prices rise, consumers are unlikely to change their purchasing decisions by very much.

    However, it would be a mistake to consider tequila in isolation. When I factored in other notable decreases, such as a $100 million drop in whiskey imports, I found that the value of total trade losses, in the form of decreased imports, would outweigh the total tariff revenue. I also found that no product category would come out ahead.

    In fact, even products like vodka, which are mostly exempt from these tariffs, would be indirectly affected. This is because tariffs can increase the overall cost of importing, leading businesses to reduce all imports, tariffed or otherwise. My research suggests that this “trade destruction” effect, to use an economics term, will be quite significant.

    A new era of tariffs

    The Trump administration has argued that tariffs will generate a lot of money for the federal government. But my research suggests those gains may not outweigh the economic costs to businesses and consumers.

    Contrary to common belief, trade losses don’t just affect exporting countries. Domestic consumers also face higher prices and fewer choices – hurting their overall economic welfare. Reducing imports also affects U.S. businesses involved in marketing, distribution and sales.

    Trade is more complex than a simple formula of “exports good, imports bad.” Research makes it clear that tariffs have negative consequences, including higher consumer prices, reduced product availability and downstream economic disruption. Policymakers would be wise to take those effects seriously. Otherwise, they might find themselves with a serious economic hangover.

    Andrew Muhammad does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. Trump’s tariffs on Canada and Mexico could spell trouble for distilled spirits – https://theconversation.com/trumps-tariffs-on-canada-and-mexico-could-spell-trouble-for-distilled-spirits-251583

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI Global: US swing toward autocracy doesn’t have to be permanent – but swinging back to democracy requires vigilance, stamina and elections

    Source: The Conversation – USA – By Jennifer Victor, Associate Professor of Political Science, George Mason University

    The United States is no longer a democracy.

    At least, that’s the verdict of one nonprofit, the Center for Systemic Peace, which measures regime qualities of countries worldwide based on the competitiveness and integrity of their elections, limits to executive authority and other factors.

    “The USA is no longer considered a democracy and lies at the cusp of autocracy,” the group’s 2025 report read.

    It calls Donald Trump’s second inauguration following a raft of criminal indictments and convictions, combined with the U.S. Supreme Court’s July 2024 granting of sweeping presidential immunity, a “presidential coup.”

    Generally, only scholars pay attention to this kind of technical index. This year, however, many people are calling out the erosion of U.S. democracy.

    Political scientists like myself can see that in the guise of government “efficiency,” the Trump administration is sabotaging the rule of law to such an extent that authoritarianism is taking hold in America.

    How long might this situation last?

    US no longer a democracy?

    The term “political regime” refers to either the person or people who hold power, or to a classification of government, including in a democracy.

    Since the mid-1960s, when the U.S. expanded voting rights to include its Black citizens, historians and political scientists have generally classified the U.S. as having a democratic regime. That means the government holds free and fair elections, embraces universal voting rights, protects civil liberties and obeys the law.

    All of these areas have significantly degraded in the U.S. over the last few decades due to partisan polarization and political extremism. Now, the rule of law is under attack, too.

    Trump’s unprecedented use of nearly 100 executive orders in the first two months of his presidency aims to enact a vast policy agenda by decree. For comparison, President Joe Biden issued 162 executive orders over four years.

    This is not what the founders had in mind: Congress is the constitutional route for policy-making. Skirting it threatens democracy, as do the issues Trump’s orders address. From attempting to deny citizenship through birthright to abolishing the U.S. Department of Education, Trump is attacking both the U.S. Constitution and Congress. His administration has even defied judges who order it to stop.

    All of this challenges the rule of law – that is, the idea that everyone, including those in power, must follow the same laws.

    When things get this bad, can a country recover?

    Autocrats can be beaten

    Based on my research, the short answer is yes – eventually.

    When a political party that does not honor democratic institutions or heed critical democratic norms takes power, political scientists expect the government to shift toward autocratic rule. That means restricting civil liberties, quashing dissent and undermining the rule of law.

    This is happening right now in the U.S.

    The Trump administration is challenging broadcasters for their election coverage and banning speech that does not conform to its gender ideology. It’s flagrantly violating the Constitution. And it’s eliminating federal funding for universities and research centers that oppose its actions.

    However, as long as a country has a robust opposition and elections that offer real opportunities for alternative parties to win office, the regime shift is not necessarily permanent.

    Take Brazil, for example.

    Its 2022 election ousted President Jair Bolsonaro, leader of an autocratic regime that had attacked the Brazilian media, judiciary and legislature. Bolsonaro claimed his loss to President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva was fraudulent, and in January 2023 his supporters attacked the nation’s capital. Since then, Bolsonaro has been charged with plotting a coup and barred from seeking office until 2030.

    Brazilian voters and the courts stemmed the country’s autocratic slide and returned it to a democratic regime.

    Polarization swings the pendulum

    Today the American public is deeply divided and dissatisfied with how U.S. democracy works. This polarization translates into presidential elections that are narrowly won.

    According to the American Presidency Project at the University of California Santa Barbara, which measures presidential margins of victory by subtracting the electoral vote percentage from the popular vote percentage for each election, the average margin of victory in presidential elections between 1932 and 2000 was 25 points. Since 2000, it has been 7.8 points.

    Moreover, since 1948, every time the White House changed hands after an election, it flipped parties as well, with one exception in 1988. Political scientists refer to this back-and-forth as “thermostatic shifting.” In other words, the electorate regularly sours on the status quo and aims to adjust the thermostat to another temperature – or political party.

    When a party that more strongly favors democratic principles takes power, the U.S. more firmly adheres to democratic institutions and norms. This was essentially Biden’s winning pitch to voters in 2020.

    Trump’s return to the White House despite two impeachments and a criminal conviction on 34 felony charges marked another pendulum swing – this time, back in the direction of authoritarianism.

    The U.S. political pendulum has been singing back and forth like this since at least 2016, with Trump’s first win. I expect the oscillation to continue.

    A kind of equilibrium

    The risk, of course, is that a ruling authoritarian-leaning party abuses its power to ensure that the opposition can never again win. This has happened in recent decades in Hungary, Turkey and Venezuela, to name a few.

    There are good reasons to believe that a permanent slide into autocracy is harder in the U.S. than in those countries.

    The U.S. has a robust and wealthy network of civil society organizations, which are well versed in exercising their civil liberties. Its decentralized federalist structure is harder for any one person or party to seize. U.S. elections for example, are run by state and local governments, not the federal government. This makes its election systems more resilient than more centralized election systems.

    At the moment, I see no reason to fear that the U.S. will fail to hold free and fair elections in 2026 or 2028.

    For the time being, then, the U.S. is in what I call a “pendular equilibrium.” Parties trade majority control as voters react to extremism, shifting the regime from more autocratic to more democratic depending on who is in power.

    The effect is a stable outcome of sorts – not a static stability but a dynamic stability. Despite the day-to-day chaos, there is balance over time in the predictable shift back and forth.

    When the pendulum stops swinging

    Until, that is, some other force comes along to disrupt the pattern.

    This might be a force more toward fascism that restricts elections to the point of futility, as in Venezuela and Russia. Or the equilibrium could be thrown off by a democratic resurgence, in the model of Brazil or Poland.

    Even just maintaining the pendular equilibrium to conserve some manner of democratic regime will require those who oppose authoritarianism to boldly insist on political leaders who value democratic principles: fair elections, voting rights, civil liberties and rule of law.

    Dangerously, many Americans won’t notice the end of democracy as it happens. As the political scientist Tom Pepinksy writes, life in authoritarian states is mostly boring and tolerable.

    For those who pay attention, the frequency and seriousness of lawless actions can nonetheless make it difficult to sustain an organized opposition.

    Until and unless the U.S. nurtures and elects political movements and leaders who make lasting democratic changes, I believe the country will continue to lurch back and forth in its pendulum swing.

    Jennifer Victor serves as the Vice Chair of the Board of Directors of OpenSecrets, a non-partisan, non-profit. This is an unpaid position.

    ref. US swing toward autocracy doesn’t have to be permanent – but swinging back to democracy requires vigilance, stamina and elections – https://theconversation.com/us-swing-toward-autocracy-doesnt-have-to-be-permanent-but-swinging-back-to-democracy-requires-vigilance-stamina-and-elections-250383

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI: Cloudera Appoints Leo Brunnick as Chief Product Officer

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    SANTA CLARA, Calif., March 26, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Cloudera, the only true hybrid platform for data, analytics, and AI, today announced the appointment of Leo Brunnick as Chief Product Officer. With more than 30 years of experience leading technology teams, Brunnick will work closely with CEO Charles Sansbury and the entire Cloudera leadership team to oversee the company’s product and technology direction.

    “Not many companies today understand that enterprises require flexibility to successfully deploy new solutions, but Cloudera clearly has that down,” said Brunnick. “Cloudera is the only data platform provider that offers both robust on-premises and cloud-native data and AI services to enable a truly hybrid experience behind customer firewalls. These capabilities, combined with the incredible AI talent and growing ecosystem of partners, are what drew me to the company.”

    Brunnick recently served as the Chief Operating Officer of Naviga, a software provider for content development in media. During his six years there, Brunnick led a team of more than 600 product, marketing, engineering, and customer support professionals. Prior to his time at Naviga, he held several leadership roles at Vignette, including EVP of Engineering, Chief Product Officer, and Chief Marketing Officer, until the company’s sale to OpenText in 2008. Brunnick also served as an officer in the Marine Corps and earned his MBA from Georgia State University after graduating from Harvard University with his bachelor’s degree in general engineering.

    “Leo’s experience guiding high-performing teams and translating customer needs into platform excellence will be invaluable to Cloudera as we continue to lead the data, analytics, and AI markets,” said Sansbury. “With Leo officially onboard, Cloudera is set to continue accelerating product innovation to provide our customers with the most robust hybrid solution on the market.”

    To learn more about Cloudera, visit www.cloudera.com.

    About Cloudera
    Cloudera is the only true hybrid platform for data, analytics, and AI. With 100x more data under management than other cloud-only vendors, Cloudera empowers global enterprises to transform data of all types, on any public or private cloud, into valuable, trusted insights. Our open data lakehouse delivers scalable and secure data management with portable cloud-native analytics, enabling customers to bring GenAI models to their data while maintaining privacy and ensuring responsible, reliable AI deployments. The world’s largest brands in financial services, insurance, media, manufacturing, and government rely on Cloudera to use their data to solve what was once impossible—today and in the future. 

    To learn more, visit Cloudera.com and follow us on LinkedIn and X. Cloudera and associated marks are trademarks or registered trademarks of Cloudera, Inc. All other company and product names may be trademarks of their respective owners.

    Contact
    Jess Hohn-Cabana
    cloudera@v2comms.com

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: First images: Chorlton Library to reopen after year-long restoration

    Source: City of Manchester

    One of Manchester’s most historic libraries, Chorlton Library, is set to reopen its doors to the public and welcome visitors again following a year-long refurbishment.

    An iconic building in the heart of Chorlton, this Grade II listed library has gone through a complete transformation to enhance the existing structure and refurbish the building. This process has unveiled long-hidden architectural treasures at the same time as upgrading facilities, to ensure it stays relevant for the next 100 years.

    The library, opened in 1914, and was a gift from the famous Scottish- American benefactor Andrew Carnegie to the city of Manchester. It was designed by the City Architect, Henry Price – who also designed Didsbury Library.

    The centrepiece of this transformation has been the unveiling of the stunning dome in the library entrance along with the mezzanine gallery, which has been concealed for decades, and which allows natural light to flood the entrance space below.

    During the restoration work, original tiles and historic lettering which adorned key areas of the library were uncovered and carefully preserved and restored, giving a glimpse into the building’s rich past.

    Alongside the internal restoration work, the exterior stonework and windows have been repaired and electrical and mechanical systems renewed, to ensure the building contributes to lower carbon emissions to help the council meet its target of becoming zero carbon by 2038.

    With internal walls removed and the library areas reconfigured, visitors will also be able to appreciate the original octagonal interior of the atrium space, and the blend of both heritage and contemporary design within the main library.

    Once the main library reopens, work can begin on the next stage of the refurbishment to enhance the flexible community and new meeting spaces within the existing structure at the building’s rear. This will open later in the year.

    Chorlton Library opens to the public on Tuesday 1 April.
    An official launch event and fun day will take place on Saturday 5 August.

    A series of events will be taking place throughout the week.

    Chorlton Library closed for refurbishment on 24 March 2024.

    Councillor John Hacking, Executive Member for Skills, Employment and Leisure said:

    “We are thrilled to welcome the community back to this much-loved library. It is the last of our libraries to undergo a full refurbishment as part of our Library renewal programme. Our refurbishment has not only respected the building’s history but brought it up to date, ensuring it can serve the local community in the future, while meeting our sustainability plans and carbon neutral targets.

    “Revealing the dome and other hidden gems make this reopening even more special, and we can’t wait to share it with the local community who we know love it as much as we do.”
     

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Consultation begins around the long-term regeneration of the Strangeways and Cambridge neighbourhoods

    Source: City of Manchester

    An eight-week consultation and engagement process is now open that will gather local feedback around the principles for investment and development of the city centre fringe areas over the next decade

    Manchester City Council (MCC) and Salford City Council (SCC) are working in collaboration on the ambitious proposals that could see 7,000 new homes built across seven distinct neighbourhood areas, which could support 4,500 jobs.  

    The Draft Strategic Regeneration Framework (SRF) for Strangeways and Cambridge has already been heard by both Council’s respective Executive and Cabinet committees, and  local people, businesses and other stakeholders are now invited to share their thoughts on the plans.  

    Consultation 

    People can provide feedback online and in-person events will also be held for respondents to ask questions and find out more about the long-term regeneration proposals, which will also include refreshments and activities for families.  

    • Saturday 29 March, 10am – 3pm 

    Salford – Broughton Community Centre, Great Clowes Street, Salford, M7 1ZQ 

    • Tuesday 1 April, 3 – 7pm 

    Salford – Broughton Community Centre, Great Clowes Street, Salford, M7 1ZQ 

    • Monday 7 April, 3 – 7pm 

    Manchester – The Yard, 11 Bent Street, Manchester, M8 8NF 

    • Thursday 24 April, 3 – 7pm 

    Salford – Broughton Community Centre, Great Clowes Street, Salford, M7 1ZQ 

    • Tuesday 29 April, 3 – 7pm 

    Salford – Broughton Community Centre, Great Clowes Street, Salford, M7 1ZQ 

    •  Thursday 1 May, 3 – 7pm 

    Manchester – The Yard, 11 Bent Street, Manchester, M8 8NF 

    • Tuesday 6 May, 3 – 7pm 

    Manchester – The Yard, 11 Bent Street, Manchester, M8 8NF 

    The consultation will close on Monday 26 May 2025 after which the results will be reported back to MCC Executive and SCC’s cabinet committees. 

    Leader of the Council Bev Craig said:   

    “This framework is our shared long-term vision, alongside our colleagues in Salford, to deliver a transformation in the Strangeways and Cambridge communities.   

    “We have an opportunity to create a platform for development and investment, enabled by the successful work carried out by the Operation Vulcan partnership, to support businesses to grow and prosper in these neighbourhoods – creating thousands of new jobs and support the ongoing growth of our city – alongside a major new public park and new homes, including Council, social and genuinely affordable housing.  

    “We know this area has challenges, including the prison that presents a key barrier to the regeneration of the area, but we also know that there is energy and a community brimming with potential.   

    “We will deliver huge change in Strangeways in the coming years, working alongside the people who live and work there, and as we move to consultation in the coming weeks, we want to speak to local people and businesses about how we can make this part of the city thrive.”  

    Salford City Mayor, Paul Dennett added:   

    “We’ve been on a journey of growth and regeneration in recent years, and our work has  changed the landscape in different parts of Salford for the benefit of our residents. It’s now time to focus on the Cambridge area and working with colleagues in Manchester, this framework provides us with a once in a lifetime opportunity to do that.  

    “This framework proposes options for the Salford part of the SRF, taking into account the requirements of residents and local businesses, and the need for quality housing in the area. The key will be to balance these needs with what the long-term flood data is telling us and how we future-proof the area against climate change.  

    “The proposals in the framework seek to identify the best possible options for this area. These include the exciting opportunity to create a new city park for all, with an option for appropriate levels of mixed-use development, to continue to drive sustainable growth.  

    “I’d urge everyone with a vested interest in this area, whether you’re a resident or business to engage with the consultation process and work with us help shape the future of this part of the city.” 

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Address to the National Press Club, Canberra

    Source: Australian Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister for Industry

    Here we are, back again on Ngunnawal land, gathering at the kind invitation of Maurice and the Board, sponsors and members of the National Press Club.

    But since last time, not just one new President but 2: Trump; and Connell.

    Congratulations Tom on your election, and thanks for your introduction –

    And to everyone here, including the pundits and, on recent form, maybe a couple of protesters again too.

    Last night marked the first time since Ben Chifley was PM and Treasurer, more than 3 quarters of a century ago, that there’ve been 4 budgets in a single term.

    And of the 11 times I’ve spoken here, I think it’s the 4 post‑Budget opportunities I’ve cherished the most.

    Partly because Laura Chalmers comes along, and is here again, she brought Leo last night, and that means a lot to me.

    And also, because they offer us the chance to go behind the Budget a bit, to provide some more of the colour and context.

    Today I want to talk about how our economy is turning a corner, even as global conditions take a turn for the worse.

    Explain how seismic changes in the world validate and vindicate our strategy, rather than undermine it.

    And lay out our government’s economic case for re‑election –

    Based on our progress to here, our plans from here, and the risks posed by our opponents.

    The fourth shock

    First let me sketch the backdrop.

    Twenty years ago, I fronted up for my first of 19 Budget lockups.

    Costello was Treasurer, and the global economy was a very different place.

    In the 2 decades since, half a dozen subsequent Treasurers presided over 3 big economic shocks.

    The first, a financial crisis that became a demand shock.

    The second, a pandemic that became a supply shock.

    The third, an inflationary shock that lingers around the world longer than anyone hoped.

    Escalating trade tensions now risk, if not represent, the fourth big economic shock in just 17 years.

    Now, if you think about the big post‑war global economic story.

    From Bretton Woods in 1945, to the high inflation of the 70s.

    The Washington Consensus that held from the end of the Cold War until the start of the GFC.

    There’s a tendency to talk about economic shocks as punctuation. A break in the flow.

    But the last 20 years prove that global shocks – in one form or another – are chapters in their own right.

    They no longer interrupt the story – they are the story.

    Acknowledgements

    Governing a country like ours in uncertain times like these is a responsibility we accept and an opportunity we cherish.

    Led by the Prime Minister – who is here today.

    His collaborative style of leadership is appreciated by all of us in his team.

    Katy and I told the Cabinet yesterday that we consider ourselves very fortunate to have been so well‑supported by so many ministers, a number of them here today and I thank and acknowledge them again.

    And no Treasurer has ever been more fortunate than me when it comes to the Finance Minister.

    The best colleague I’ve ever had.

    Nothing we’ve done over the course of 4 Budgets would be possible without her calm and composure, her empathy and judgement.

    Katy came to the Treasury thank you dinner on Thursday night.

    I’m told that’s unprecedented – but for us it’s not unusual.

    I’m sure Katy would agree it’s not the most glamorous ritual.

    The pile of pide boxes and a sea of tired eyes sums up the week, and weeks, before.

    But it gives us a chance to say thanks to Steven, Jenny, Glyn and all the officials involved in putting this Budget together.

    That evening, I was reflecting with officials on the time I spent as a public servant, working for Glyn in Queensland.

    He was the first to tell me what it looked like inside the Cabinet Room here in Parliament House.

    Right down to the framed paintings of Australian lorikeets on the walls.

    Those birds have seen and heard a lot!

    I’m told I’ve spent 664 hours in that room this term – which is about 27 days.

    Whenever I’m in there, I try to remember that’s it’s not the birds in the frame or the galahs in the pet shop that really matter.

    We try to ensure those conversations around the cabinet table are shaped by the conversations Australians are having around the kitchen table.

    We know cost of living is front of mind for most Australians and that’s why it’s been front and centre in all 4 budgets.

    No matter how difficult or long the deliberations might be in that room I’m always aware how lucky we are to be in there.

    Treasurers stand there on Budget night on behalf of all who do so much to put our plans into Budgets, and into action.

    ERC ministers who undertake the essential deliberations – 233 of those 664 cabinet room hours were with them.

    Every member of our caucus who all do so much to advocate for the people they represent.

    The staff from our offices and all the public servants.

    Please join me in thanking them.

    Turning a corner

    This Budget makes it clear that the Australian economy is emerging from a global cost‑of‑living crisis in better shape than anywhere else.

    Inflation is down, living standards are rising, real incomes are growing, unemployment is low, interest rates are coming down, debt is down and now growth is gathering pace.

    That combination is exceptional – and not accidental.

    It is the product of the choices we have made.

    Delivering cost‑of‑living relief for every Australian.

    Strengthening Medicare and the services people count on.

    And building a Future Made in Australia.

    The 2 weeks leading into the Budget made clear just how important and urgent this work has been.

    The human and economic costs of Tropical Cyclone Alfred.

    Coming so soon after widespread flooding in north and far north Queensland – with more damaging heavy rains there just last week.

    And now, fresh turmoil in the world – part of this fourth shock.

    All of this vindicates the course we chose 3 years ago.

    And validates the choices we made together.

    Economic case for re‑election

    This is where I want to pay tribute to the Prime Minister.

    The leader Australians see standing with emergency services in disasters brings the same decency to every challenge confronting our nation.

    Anthony’s leadership is defined by his compassion, his optimism – and his determination.

    And he will make our case for re‑election to the Australian people with those same qualities and commitment.

    This election will be about the strong foundations we have laid, the better future we are building – and the risk of our opponents wrecking it all.

    It will be a referendum on Medicare.

    A simple choice between Labor cutting taxes and helping with the cost of living –

    And Peter Dutton’s secret cuts which will make Australians worse off.

    Because he wants to cut everything except income taxes for workers.

    Above all else it will be an election about the economy.

    Labor’s economic case for a second term has 3 parts:

    The progress we have made together in the economy and repairing the budget.

    The work we are doing and the economic plan we are implementing – to boost wages, rebuild living standards, and make our economy more resilient, more competitive and more productive.

    And the deliberate threat and significant danger that the Coalition pose if they form the next government.

    Reason one: progress

    The economic progress documented in the Budget last night belongs to every Australian.

    It’s all the more remarkable against a backdrop of extreme global uncertainty.

    To give you a sense of that, take inflation.

    In the most recent quarterly data, inflation sits at 2.4 per cent – and just now, today’s monthly reading came in the same.

    On election night, in May of 2022, inflation was more than double that and rising.

    So when I stood here after our first Budget in October that year, inflation was nearly triple what it is today.

    In that first Budget, we were talking about how far we had to go together.

    Today, we can point to how far we’ve come.

    We have brought inflation down while encouraging a broader recovery in our economy, now well underway.

    Our fiscal policy helped break the back of inflation when it was at its peak.

    It adjusted to support growth and preserve employment, as inflation came down.

    And we’ve delivered responsible cost‑of‑living relief that has directly taken the pressure off prices.

    Because of this a soft landing is coming into view –

    With growth rebounding, living standards recovering, and the private sector playing a larger role.

    The last financial year saw the highest level of business investment in over a decade.

    Four in every 5 of the million jobs created have been in the private sector.

    25,000 new businesses created each month this term – the highest average on record.

    Real wages and living standards rising again.

    While the gender pay gap is at near record lows and unemployment is at around 4 per cent.

    Treasury expects employment growth this year will be stronger, inflation will come down faster, and participation will stay near its record high for longer compared with the mid‑year update.

    So, our economy isn’t just growing faster, it’s growing in a way which will be stronger, more sustainable and more inclusive too.

    All this, while successfully steering towards a stunning improvement in our fiscal position.

    We inherited a mess and we’re cleaning it up.

    The budget bottom line is $207 billion better off on our watch.

    This is the biggest ever nominal improvement in a single term.

    Turning $135 billion of Liberal deficits into surpluses worth $38 billion – the first back‑to‑back surpluses in 2 decades.

    Almost halving the deficit we inherited for this financial year.

    And improving the budget position every year of the forward estimates, compared to PEFO.

    All this is a deliberate result of our responsibility and restraint.

    Banking the vast majority of revenue upgrades – around 7 of every 10 dollars.

    Restraining spending growth to 1.7 per cent – less than half the average under our predecessors.

    Finding almost $95 billion of savings – more this term than they managed over their last 2 combined, with precisely zero in their last Budget.

    Making real structural reform to secure the future of aged care and the National Disability Insurance Scheme.

    Guaranteeing the choice, dignity and security they bring to millions of Australians.

    And tackling high and rising interest costs.

    Just after coming to government, they were forecast to grow by 14.4 per cent per year.

    After 3 years of responsibility and restraint we’ve managed to cut that to 9.5 per cent.

    A big part of this story is our decision to return the vast majority of revenue upgrades to the bottom line.

    Not only has this improved the budget position by around $250 billion dollars to 2028–29.

    It means we will save about $112 billion in interest payments over the medium term.

    Reason 2: plans

    We don’t see the substantial progress we’ve made on the budget as an end in itself.

    Repairing the budget and rebuilding living standards go hand in hand.

    Our responsible approach has made room for the 5 main priorities of this Budget.

    Helping with the cost of living.

    Strengthening Medicare.

    Building more homes.

    Investing in every stage of education.

    And making our economy stronger, more productive, and more resilient.

    These are essential components of our economic plan.

    To strengthen our resilience in uncertain times.

    To create a more dynamic, competitive economy.

    And to rebuild incomes and living standards.

    Rebuilding living standards

    In this Budget we’re delivering more cost‑of‑living relief for Australians when it’s needed.

    Extending energy bill relief.

    Funding wage increases for care workers.

    Making medicines cheaper.

    Relieving student debt.

    And lowering taxes for every taxpayer.

    The combined benefit for an average household will be more than $15,000 from our 3 rounds of tax cuts and energy bill relief alone.

    Substantial relief while also building the earning capacity of Australians for the future too.

    By improving access to education – so that every Australian gets the chance to work in the jobs of the future.

    By investing in Medicare and expanding bulk billing – minimising out of pocket health costs and time out of work.

    And by moving towards universal early childhood education – so that parents can work more, if they want to.

    These parts of our plan to rebuild living standards are distinct but interlinked.

    Take our tax cut top‑up – a modest but meaningful addition to the tax cuts we’re rolling out already.

    The average annual tax cut, after this year’s and next year’s, is $2,548 or about $50 a week.

    Our tax cuts will:

    Boost incomes by 1.9 per cent within 2 years.

    Support the private sector recovery.

    Increase participation by more than 1.3 million hours –

    With Treasury estimating that 900,000 of these hours will be taken up by women.

    And give people a better start in their careers with the average young worker receiving a tax cut more than twice the size they would have under the Coalition.

    So, our tax cuts provide immediate relief while also boosting participation, aspiration, and Australians’ long‑term earning potential too.

    Resilience

    This focus on improving living standards is a big part of this Budget because it’s the fundamental mission of our government.

    Creating opportunities, and helping people seize them in a world full of churn and change.

    We cannot undo or ignore the shift from globalisation to fragmentation.

    We can determine how we respond.

    That’s what a Future Made in Australia is about.

    It’s a pro‑trade agenda, that puts a premium on private sector investment.

    It rejects self‑sabotaging tariffs and trade barriers, protectionism and isolationism.

    It focuses on how we shore up critical supply chains and become indispensable to new ones.

    This is critical to the jobs of the future.

    And it’s vital to managing uncertainty now.

    $30 billion of projects in sectors like green hydrogen, critical minerals and clean energy manufacturing have been proposed or are in development.

    Our plan is to build on this progress – improving our resilience by unlocking our competitiveness.

    In this Budget we’re facilitating more private investment in renewable energy – our fundamental comparative advantage in the new net zero economy.

    We’re funding research in clean energy technology manufacturing and low carbon liquid fuels – so we can commercialise Australian innovations.

    And we’re making big investments in green metals – leveraging our traditional strength in resources to build new opportunities.

    Reform

    A Future Made in Australia, powered by cleaner and cheaper energy, positions us as an essential part of the global net zero economy.

    This will be critical to our growth prospects.

    But it’s not the only part of our growth agenda.

    We know the foundations of future success start with more competitiveness, and a more productive economy.

    That’s why we’re reforming the payments system, our financial market infrastructure, approvals processes, our foreign investment framework and more.

    It might be unusual to keep the wheels of economic reform turning in a pre‑election Budget, but that’s what we’re doing.

    First, by banning non‑compete clauses for most workers.

    And second, by creating a national licensing scheme for electrical occupations.

    We’re proud of these changes because they show that the way to increase competition and productivity in our economy isn’t with scorched‑earth industrial relations –

    Or making Australians work longer for less.

    It’s with policy that boosts competition, while boosting wages and our workforce at the same time.

    This is a Budget that’s pro‑worker, pro‑growth and pro‑competition.

    Our reform to non‑competes will remove a handbrake on competition and a speedbump to aspiration.

    Most workers will no longer need a lawyer to get a better paying job.

    They won’t need permission from their old boss to become their own boss.

    Instead, we’re empowering them to move jobs and earn more and start businesses if they want to.

    This could add an estimated $5 billion annually to our economy.

    At the same time as average wages for those freed from these restrictions could increase by up to $2,500 a year.

    We’re also boosting competition and backing workers with a new occupational licensing regime for electricians.

    Requiring electricians to get a new license every time they want to work inter‑state is unnecessary, costly red tape.

    We’re making sure a sparky on the Tweed doesn’t need a different licence for a job in Coolangatta.

    Broader licensing reform could lift GDP by up to $10 billion a year.

    Which is why this change will be a template for future reform.

    Reason 3: risk

    Our progress to here, and our plan for what’s ahead, make up 2 parts of our economic case for re‑election.

    The third is the risk that all this could be undone by a Coalition government.

    Usually at this point in Budget week or the electoral cycle, you would set some basic tests for your opponent.

    On this occasion they’ve already failed them.

    The Coalition has put forward the ‘weakest policy offering from an opposition in living memory’, according to industry sources.

    They either don’t have a clue or they won’t come clean.

    But what looks like slapstick comedy masks more sinister intent.

    We know this because Angus Taylor has told us, and the Coalition’s position on key issues has shown us.

    Now, Angus and I don’t agree on much.

    But to give credit where it’s due, he made one insightful point recently when he said ‘the best predictor of future performance is past performance’.

    And – in a dramatic break from usual Coalition internals – Peter Dutton backed him in.

    On this, they are absolutely right.

    Their past performance is no surpluses, more waste and rorts, and more debt.

    Their past performance is middle Australia missing out – with real wages in reverse and living standards falling fast.

    Their past performance is much higher and rising inflation.

    Their past performance is Peter Dutton’s attacks on Medicare.

    But it is not just their record in government that reveals their priorities and what they would do if elected.

    Their recent record in Opposition makes it very clear:

    Australians would be worse off under Peter Dutton.

    When he cuts, Australians will pay.

    Cutting cost‑of‑living help is the only motivation that binds this Coalition clown show together.

    They’ve opposed cuts to student debt and energy bill relief.

    Opposed cheaper childcare and cheaper medicines.

    Opposed more homes and more Urgent Care Clinics.

    Today they voted for higher taxes on Australian workers.

    Australians would be much worse off if Peter Dutton had his way and they’ll be worse off still if he wins.

    This brain snap from Angus Taylor on tax makes that crystal clear.

    It means this parliamentary term finishes like it started:

    Labor helping Australians with the cost of living and Peter Dutton and the Coalition trying to prevent it.

    The Liberals and Nationals have now opposed 3 tax cuts, 3 times in 3 years.

    Instead of working with us to help Australians, they’ve got secret plans to harm them.

    It beggars belief that Peter Dutton says he will make hundreds of billions in cuts, but won’t tell Australians where or how.

    There’s only one reason for that – and people should know about it.

    The Coalition can’t find the $600 billion they need for nuclear, or the billions in cuts they’ve promised, without coming after Medicare again.

    The point I’m making is this.

    When the Australian economy is turning a corner.

    And the global economy is taking a turn for the worse.

    We can’t afford to turn back.

    Not when so little is known about the alternative.

    Conclusion

    I know this tradition is as much about your questions as it is about the Treasurer’s address.

    So let me just share some final thoughts.

    There are familiar rituals and rhythms to Budget week.

    Even after 20 years, you can still get caught up in them.

    But a budget is never about one week, or 5.

    It’s overwhelmingly a program for the years ahead.

    Ours also makes the economic case for re‑election.

    More than that, it spells out our plan for action to build on the progress we’ve made together.

    Now, it’s probably fair to say that over the years and out in the suburbs there’s been a flattening of expectations of what we can achieve through economic policymaking.

    And a narrowing of our collective sense that political leadership can make a real and tangible difference in people’s lives.

    Every one of us has reason to reflect on our role, but also, on whether we can turn it around.

    Because Australians should be proud of all that we have achieved together.

    We are on the cusp of something extraordinary in our economy.

    But something prevents us from saying so.

    Maybe that’s because of Australians’ natural streak of humility.

    Maybe after years of crisis, we’ve trained ourselves to brace for the next one.

    Maybe it’s the erosion of trust in institutions that we see around the world.

    Something that Australia has so far managed to avoid the most extreme fallout from.

    But a big part of it is undoubtedly due to the pressure people are under.

    We get that.

    Because, while we have every reason to be optimistic about the future, we understand that this can often run ahead of
    how people are faring and feeling.

    For many Australians, the pressures of the past few years have been substantial.

    So let me say we don’t just acknowledge that – we’re doing something about it.

    You saw that again in the Budget last night.

    Yes, inflation is coming down, real wages are up, unemployment is low, interest rates have started coming down, the economy is bouncing back.

    But for many people, the gap between working hard and getting ahead still needs eliminating.

    That’s why there’s more work to do.

    It’s why our focus isn’t confined to the national numbers – as important as they are.

    This Budget is about more than turning the corner, it’s a plan for where we go next.

    Not just putting the worst behind us –

    But seizing what’s in front of us.

    In this new world of uncertainty –

    Creating a new generation of prosperity –

    That is stronger, because it is more inclusive –

    In the better future that we’re building together.

    Thanks very much.

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Students and graduates of SPbGASU distinguished themselves at the 10th Architectural and Urban Planning Foresight RBC

    Translartion. Region: Russians Fedetion –

    Source: Saint Petersburg State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering – Saint Petersburg State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering – From left to right: Egor Starshov, Daniil Koskov, Ekaterina Zorina, Lyudmila Morshchakova, Gleb Rosin, Ivan Zabavin, Veronika Petrenko, Elena Vorobyova, Anastasia Dedyurina, Yana Golubeva

    Students and graduates of SPbGASU were among the authors of the winning project of the 10th RBC Architectural and Urban Planning Foresight.

    The team included: captain Anastasia Dyadurina (SPbGASU); SPbGASU bachelor’s degree graduates Elena Vorobyova (ITMO University), Ivan Zabavin (ITMO University), Veronika Petrenko (I.E. Repin St. Petersburg Academy of Arts); as well as Ekaterina Zorina (Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University (SPbPU)), Daniil Koskov (European University at St. Petersburg), Lyudmila Morshchakova (SPbPU), Gleb Rosin (Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration), curators Yana Golubeva (MLA architectural bureau) and Egor Starshov (Graduate School of Management of St. Petersburg State University).

    Architectural and urban planning foresight is a research and media project of RBC Petersburg. It is aimed at finding optimal ways to develop urban areas; organizing competent discussions of urban planning issues among leading architects, developers, economists, representatives of the city’s authorities and public organizations; promoting progressive solutions using modern visualization tools.

    The theme of the tenth foresight was “The Petersburg project. A city of the new era with a Petersburg identity.” Six teams participated. Their curators were leading architects and urbanists of Petersburg. The jury also included representatives of universities and development companies. The partners were the RBI Group, Formula City, PSK Group, Bau City Development and L.Buro studio.

    Anastasia Dyadurina is a second-year Master’s student at the Faculty of Architecture. She took part in the RBC 2023–24 foresight on the topic of “Residential agglomeration of the future” – she led the team that won with the project “Neurogarden. Where nature creates the future”. The RBC 2024–25 foresight really interested the student in its topic. “I love St. Petersburg with all my heart, and the opportunity to talk about its identity, present and future, inspired me,” said Anastasia.

    The winning project was called “Capillar City”. It is an ambitious idea to save the Northern capital from the threat of flooding in the context of global warming. The authors suggested looking at the city as a living organism, where each channel and river becomes part of a single life support system; imagine a city where a new network of artificial channels works like a circulatory system, evenly distributing and utilizing excess water.

    The network of artificial canals being created will connect historical reservoirs, turning them into transport arteries. Year-round water trams will run along these “capillaries” – real “blood corpuscles” that ensure uninterrupted movement along three rings: the Small Water Ring around the historical center, the Middle Ring through residential areas, and the Highway Ring around the Ring Road.

    Every corner of the city – from the historical center to new buildings – will receive its share of water and greenery. These canals will give St. Petersburg a new identity, combining history and future into a single harmonious organism.

    The authors are sure that the capillary city is not just an engineering solution. It is a chance to give Petersburg a new impulse to life, protect its unique architecture and ensure a future for generations.

    “I regularly participate in architectural competitions, but the format of foresight is unique: participants are given maximum freedom within the framework of the designated topic. Foresight lasts for six months, teams of students and young specialists from various fields are recruited, from architecture and urban planning to sociology and economics. Each team is assigned a curator, most often a famous architect. In addition, lectures and discussions are held during the competition, including with the participation of top officials of development companies. The competition is aimed at creating a multidisciplinary professional community, where different specialists can look into the future together.

    This year the theme was especially free, there was not even a designated area for design. Our team went through a change of curator, and in the end we managed to collaborate with the founder of the MLA bureau, Yana Golubeva. The team, which initially consisted of 20 people, was reduced to eight by the final. As the captain, I had the task of defining the general vector of the project, developing a concept together with the guys, breaking it down into tasks, distributing them among the participants and preserving the integrity of the project from the idea to the implementation. I am especially glad that I managed to organize the work so that each of the team members revealed their best sides.

    The team and I understood that taking on the task of digging 205 kilometers of canals in St. Petersburg to save it from flooding and to define a new identity for the city was a very ambitious task. We took all the risks and were able to successfully create a project that was highly appreciated by the jury and the public,” said Anastasia Dyadurina. We congratulate the team on their victory and wish them further professional success!

    Project presentation

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI USA: March 31 Deadline to Apply for Several Disaster Assistance Programs Fast Approaching

    Source: US Federal Emergency Management Agency

    Headline: March 31 Deadline to Apply for Several Disaster Assistance Programs Fast Approaching

    March 31 Deadline to Apply for Several Disaster Assistance Programs Fast Approaching

    LOS ANGELES – March 31 is the last day to apply for or submit information for several key disaster assistance programs for individuals impacted by the Los Angeles Wildfires

    Apply for FEMA Individual Assistance: Online at DisasterAssistance

    gov

    On the FEMA App

    By calling the FEMA Helpline at 1-800-621-3362

    If you use a relay service, give FEMA your number for that service

    Assistance is available in multiple languages

    Lines are open Sunday–Saturday, from 4 a

    m

    – 10 p

    m

    Pacific

    At a Disaster Recovery Center (DRC)

    Visit a DRC at one of the addresses below:UCLA Research Park West 10850 West Pico Blvd

     Los Angeles, CA 90064 Open Mon

    – Sat

    : 9 a

    m

    to 7 p

    m

    Altadena Disaster Recovery Center540 West Woodbury Rd

     Altadena, CA 91001 Open Mon

    – Sat

    : 9 a

    m

    to 7 p

    m

    For an American Sign Language video on how to apply, visit FEMA Accessible: Three Ways to Register for FEMA Disaster Assistance

    Submit a Right of Entry form to LA County: Complete the opt-in form online at: Los Angeles County Right of Entry Permit for Debris Removal on Private Property

    Download and complete a form: Debris Removal Right of Entry Permit (00011201

    DOCX;1)

    In Person

    Pick up a form at a Disaster Recovery Center

    Visit the DRC Locator to find a location

    Apply for SBA Low-Interest Disaster Loans:Online at sba

    gov/disaster By calling SBA’s Customer Service Center hotline at 800-659-2955

     People who are deaf, hard of hearing or have a speech disability may dial 711 to access relay services

    By emailingDisasterCustomerService@sba

    govAt a Disaster Recovery Center or Business Recovery Center, where you can submit a completed application or SBA representatives can help you apply

    To find a BRC near you, go to Appointment

    sba

    gov

    Applications for disaster loans may be submitted online using the MySBA Loan Portal at https://lending

    sba

    gov or other locally announced locations

     For the latest information about California’s recovery, visit fema

    gov/disaster/4856

    Follow FEMA Region 9 @FEMARegion9 on X or follow FEMA on social media at: FEMA Blog on fema

    gov, @FEMA or @FEMAEspanol on X, FEMA or FEMA Espanol on Facebook, @FEMA on Instagram, and via FEMA YouTube channel

     California is committed to supporting residents impacted by the Los Angeles Hurricane-Force Firestorm as they navigate the recovery process

    Visit CA

    gov/LAFires for up-to-date information on disaster recovery programs, important deadlines, and how to apply for assistance

    alberto

    pillot
    Wed, 03/26/2025 – 00:58

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Disaster Recovery Center Opening in Lee County

    Source: US Federal Emergency Management Agency

    Headline: Disaster Recovery Center Opening in Lee County

    Disaster Recovery Center Opening in Lee County

    FRANKFORT, Ky

    –A Disaster Recovery Center is opening March 24 in Lee County to offer in-person support to Kentucky survivors who experienced loss as the result of Feb

    14 – March 7 severe storms, straight-line winds, flooding, landslides and mudslides

     The new Disaster Recovery Center in Lee County is located at: Happy Top Park Community Center, 500 Happy Top Road, Beattyville, KY 41311Working days and hours are March 24-28, 9 a

    m

    to 7 p

    m

    Eastern TimeFEMA representatives can explain available assistance programs, how to apply to FEMA, and help connect survivors with resources for their recovery needs

    Representatives from the Kentucky Office of Unemployment Insurance, the Kentucky Department of Insurance and the U

    S

    Small Business Administration (SBA) will also be available at the recovery centers to assist survivors

    Additional Disaster Recovery Centers are scheduled to open in other Kentucky counties

    Click here to find centers that are already open in Kentucky

    You can visit any open center to meet with representatives of FEMA, the commonwealth of Kentucky and the U

    S

    Small Business Administration

    No appointment is needed

     To find all other center locations, including those in other states, go to fema

    gov/drc or text “DRC” and a Zip Code to 43362

     FEMA is encouraging Kentuckians affected by the February storms to apply for federal disaster assistance as soon as possible

    The deadline to apply for FEMA assistance is April 25

    Kentucky homeowners and renters in Breathitt, Clay, Estill, Floyd, Harlan, Johnson, Knott, Lee, Leslie, Letcher, Martin, Owsley, Perry, Pike, Simpson and Woodford counties can apply for federal assistance

    If you are unable to visit the center, there are other ways to apply: online at DisasterAssistance

    gov, use the FEMA App for mobile devices or call 800-621-3362

    If you use a relay service, such as Video Relay Service (VRS), captioned telephone or other service, give FEMA the number for that service

    When you apply, you will need to provide:A current phone number where you can be contacted

    Your address at the time of the disaster and the address where you are now staying

    Your Social Security Number

    A general list of damage and losses

    Banking information if you choose direct deposit

    If insured, the policy number or the agent and/or the company name

    For an accessible video on how to apply for FEMA assistance, go to youtube

    com/watch?v=WZGpWI2RCNw

    For more information about Kentucky flooding recovery, visit www

    fema

    gov/disaster/4860

    Follow the FEMA Region 4 X account at x

    com/femaregion4

    martyce

    allenjr
    Tue, 03/25/2025 – 20:08

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Governor Newsom honors fallen King City Police Department Sergeant

    Source: US State of California 2

    Mar 25, 2025

    SACRAMENTO – Governor Gavin Newsom issued the following statement regarding the death of King City Police Department Sergeant Ryan Kenedy:

    “Jennifer and I mourn alongside the King City community over the sudden passing of Sergeant Kenedy. Our hearts are with his loved ones and colleagues.”  

    Governor Gavin Newsom

    On March 25, 2025, Sergeant Kenedy experienced a medical emergency while on-duty and passed away. Sergeant Kenedy began his career with the King City Police Department in 2014 as a patrol officer. He was promoted to Police Sergeant in January 2020. 

    He is survived by his wife and parents.

    In honor of Sergeant Kenedy, flags at the State Capitol and Capitol Annex Swing Space will be flown at half-staff.

    Press Releases, Recent News

    Recent news

    News What you need to know: Since Governor Newsom launched the joint San Bernardino operation in October 2024, the efforts have led to 858 arrests and 66 recovered stolen vehicles. Los Angeles, California – Governor Gavin Newsom today announced the ongoing joint law…

    News What you need to know: The Governor’s Wildfire and Forest Resilience Task Force released a list of 25 key deliverables to build on the state’s ongoing efforts to protect Californians from increasing threats posed by catastrophic wildfire and a changing climate….

    News What you need to know: Governor Newsom, in partnership with the Legislature, is announcing the largest-ever funding award of $76 million to 347 community groups and nonprofit organizations to protect them from hate-motivated violence. Sacramento, California –…

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI United Nations: IOM Sounds Alarm as Yemen Marks a Decade of War and Humanitarian Despair

    Source: International Organization for Migration (IOM)

    Yemen, 26 March 2025 – As Yemen enters its eleventh year of conflict, the country remains in the grip of relentless suffering. Close to 20 million people rely on aid to survive, with many having endured repeated displacement, rising hunger, and the collapse of essential services. Stranded migrants face brutal conditions with little chance of escape. Yet, as funding shortfalls worsen, humanitarian efforts are unable to keep up, leaving countless people in urgent need. 

    Now, as the holy month of Ramadan unfolds, the weight of this crisis is even heavier. For many in Yemen, iftar will not be a time of gathering and abundance, but another night of going to sleep hungry, uncertain of what tomorrow will bring. While families around the world prepare for Eid, Yemenis will mark yet another holiday in the shadow of war, where loss, hunger, and hardship have become the norm.

    “The war in Yemen has faded from global attention, but for those living through it, the suffering has never stopped,” said Abdusattor Esoev, Chief of Mission for the International Organization for Migration (IOM) in Yemen. “After more than a decade of conflict, displacement, and economic collapse, Yemen remains one of the world’s most severe humanitarian crises. However, as global attention shifts elsewhere, funding is dwindling. Now, more than ever, global solidarity is needed to prevent millions from being left behind.” 

    An estimated 4.8 million people remain displaced across Yemen, many living in makeshift shelters that offer little protection against harsh weather and minimal access to basic services. Women and children are among the most affected, exposed to heightened risks of violence, malnutrition, and poor health. At the same time, floods, droughts, and extreme weather are worsening the already dire situation. 

    Despite ongoing efforts to provide aid, severe funding gaps are making it harder to reach those in greatest need. In many areas, displaced communities are surviving with barely any assistance. As needs grow, resources continue to shrink, leaving millions at risk. 

    While Yemenis suffer the effects of war, tens of thousands of migrants also remain stranded, having arrived in the country hoping to reach the Gulf in search of better opportunities. Instead, they face exploitation, detention, violence, and dangerous journeys through active conflict zones. In 2024 alone, nearly 60,900 migrants arrived in Yemen, often with no means to survive. 

    For many, the only way out is through IOM’s Voluntary Humanitarian Return (VHR) programme, which helps migrants return home safely. Yet, without increased funding, even these critical efforts could be scaled back, leaving thousands of migrants trapped in Yemen, in increasingly dire conditions. 

    As Yemen marks another year of war, IOM calls on the international community to act now, before more lives are lost. Humanitarian needs remain vast, and the consequences of inaction will be severe. The already dire situation is at risk of becoming even more neglected, as global crises compete for attention and resources. 

    “The people of Yemen cannot afford to be forgotten,” Esoev added. “As families break their fast with barely enough to eat, as parents face another Eid unable to provide for their children, and as migrants remain stranded with no way home, the world cannot turn away. Every day without action means more suffering, more lives lost, and less hope for the future.” 

    For more information, please contact: 

    In Yemen: Monica Chiriac, mchiriac@iom.int 

    In Cairo: Joe Lowry, jlowry@iom.int 

    In Geneva: Kennedy Okoth, kokoth@iom.int 

    MIL OSI United Nations News

  • MIL-Evening Report: Politics with Michelle Grattan: Jim Chalmers and Angus Taylor on tax top-ups and budget bottom lines

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra

    As the election starter’s gun is about to be fired, Tuesday’s budget announced modest income tax cuts as the government’s latest cost-of-living measure. The Coalition has opposed the tax relief, with Peter Dutton’s Thursday budget reply to put forward his policy counters on the cost of living.

    Meanwhile, the domestic economic debate is being conducted as President Donald Trump prepares to unveil more tariffs, which are likely to produce further uncertainty in the world economy.

    On this podcast we are joined by Treasurer Jim Chalmers and Shadow Treasurer Angus Taylor.

    Chalmers says the government is making every last-minute effort to argue against Australia being hit with more US tariffs. He’s ready to make personal representations if that’s thought useful.

    I’ve been discussing that with Don Farrell, the minister for trade, whether or not that would be helpful to some of the efforts that he’s currently engaged in. So we’re working as a team on it. We’re working out the best [and] most effective ways to engage with the Americans. Again, speaking up for and standing up for our national interest.

    We’re not uniquely impacted by the tariffs either already imposed or proposed. But we’ve got a lot of skin in the game here. We’re a trading nation, we generate a lot of prosperity on global markets.

    A criticism from some about the budget was that climate change wasn’t mentioned explicitly. Chalmers takes issue with that.

    I would have thought that an extra A$3 billion for green metals, which is about leveraging our traditional strengths and resources, our developing industries and the energy transformation to create something that the world needs, I think that’s a climate change policy.

    And also the Innovation Fund, another $1.5 billion or so for the Innovation Fund in terms of sustainable aviation fuels, that’s a climate policy and also we’re recapitalising another couple of billion for the Clean Energy Finance Corporation.

    So in every budget, we’ve made new investments in climate change and in energy and this week’s budget was no different in that regard.

    Angus Taylor is scathing about Labor’s “top-up” tax cuts, which were the budget’s centrepiece, saying:

    A government that has overseen an unprecedented collapse in our living standards, unrivalled by any other country in the world, and they’re trying to tell Australians that 70 cents a day, more than a year from now, is a solution to that problem?

    It’s laughable, it is not even going to touch the sides, it’s Band-Aid on a bullet wound. It’s a cruel hoax. And frankly, the idea that this is good government is absolutely laughable.

    On what change of approach a Coalition government would take, Angus Taylor points to the “fiscal rules that we adhered to when we were last in government”.

    They were on the back of the rules that were established in the Charter of Budget Honesty that was established by Peter Costello in the 1990s to make sure your economy grows faster than your spending. That doesn’t mean spending doesn’t grow, it just means your economy grows faster.

    So both of those things matter, a faster growing economy and managing your spending so that it’s not growing faster. Jim Chalmers doesn’t get that.

    Michelle Grattan does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. Politics with Michelle Grattan: Jim Chalmers and Angus Taylor on tax top-ups and budget bottom lines – https://theconversation.com/politics-with-michelle-grattan-jim-chalmers-and-angus-taylor-on-tax-top-ups-and-budget-bottom-lines-253112

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Students of the Faculty of Economics and Management learned about ways to digitize military events and their heroes

    Translartion. Region: Russians Fedetion –

    Source: Saint Petersburg State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering – Saint Petersburg State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering –

    Dmitry Kutovoy with a portrait of a SVO participant in 3D

    As part of patriotic education for students of the Faculty of Economics and Management, a seminar “Heroes” was held, during which students listened to a lecture by Dmitry Kutovoy, a specialist in working with youth in the section “Theory and Practice of Search Work” of the teenage and youth club “Unconquered Frontier” of the Krasnoselsky District of St. Petersburg. He is the founder of the Civic-Patriotic Center “Victory”, the commander of the youth search squad “Ligovsky”, a deputy of the seventh convocation of the Uritsk municipal district, the winner of the grant project for the preservation of the historical heritage of Russia “That which is impossible to forget” and the project “Through the Ages”, a competition for the provision of a subsidy from the Committee on Youth Policy, the winner and prize-winner of the regional stage of the Professional Skills Competition. He was awarded the badge of distinction “For contribution to the perpetuation of the memory of those who died defending the Fatherland.”

    “Our club has been involved in the patriotic direction, including educational activities in educational institutions and search work, for ten years now. Over these years, we have seen that many methods of perpetuating memory have become outdated, so we decided to diversify them in order to keep up with the times and achieve greater understanding and interest among the younger generation. To this end, the club members have developed digital projects that have been well received by young people,” said Dmitry Kutovoy.

    “About the War” is one of such projects. Its essence lies in the preparation and digitalization of information about exhibits transferred by search engines to patriotic museums of educational institutions. Thus, museums receive labels with a QR code, by clicking on which you can read informative articles about the exhibits.

    Another project is “What is Impossible to Forget”. It is about perpetuating memorials, which are now presented in the digital environment. The lecturer recalled that in 1941, the German army planned to capture Leningrad through the Krasnoselsky District, and the district was on the front line of the city’s defense until the blockade was lifted. Fierce battles took place here. This explains the large number of memorials in these places. However, today many representatives of the younger generation do not know who they are for. This project helps to educate them in this direction.

    “Each memorial is presented in a 3D model and has its own authentic tragic story. For example, in Polezhaevsky Park there is a mass grave known as the grave with children. Three unknown soldiers and two children are buried there – residents of the village of Klinovo, who died on September 18, 1941, during the battle for this village. These are 16-year-old Kolya Tikhomirov and 14-year-old Sonya Lyashkevich. They ran out to meet our soldiers and immediately came under fire: the Red Army soldiers and Kolya died on the spot, his brother Tolya was seriously wounded and was treated in the hospital until 1944. Sonya died in the evening of the same day from her wounds. This project is a clear example of perpetuating the memory of events and people,” Dmitry Kutovoy emphasized.

    The “Through the Ages” project was initially dedicated to presenting military uniforms from different eras in 3D models. The authors of the project put them on, they were scanned and brought into the digital environment. Now the project has been expanded with SVO fighters: club members travel to new regions and scan them. This is how a digital 3D model of a person of real size is obtained. The model can be reduced and printed, including on a 3D printer. The soldier statues presented by the lecturer are printed digital copies of real people.

    Another project is called “No Statute of Limitations”. It is being implemented in cooperation with the Investigative Committee. Its goal is to identify new facts of the genocide of the Soviet people during the war, in particular, the shooting of civilians in Pavlovsk in 1942. Due to technical reasons, their remains have not yet been found, but the remains of nine Red Army defenders of the city have been raised. One of them has a living daughter, she is 100 years old. For further study, the remains are scanned to clarify the causes of death, the places where the bullets hit. Based on this knowledge, it is possible to partially recreate their appearance.

    “All projects are a good method of studying historical facts with explanations. Sponsors, deputies, grants and state subsidies help us create them. This once again emphasizes the understanding of the importance of our work at all levels,” the lecturer concluded.

    First-year student Daniil Li believes that the lecture was interesting and informative. “We were shown new ways of perpetuating the memory of those killed during the Great Patriotic War and history in general using new technologies and digital solutions. I learned how and why historical information, memorials, and soldiers’ uniforms are digitized: using a barcode, you can find comprehensive information on a topic of interest at any time. This is important for all generations of our country,” he noted.

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Legislation supports continued safe operation of clubs and ranges

    Source: New Zealand Government

    Legislation passed today will support the continued safe operation of shooting clubs and shooting ranges, Associate Justice Minister Nicole McKee says. 

    “This is an important step towards modernising our firearms laws and ensuring shooting clubs and ranges are fairly regulated in a manner that supports public safety. 

    “The Arms (Shooting Clubs, Shooting Ranges, and Other Matters) Amendment Act 2025 was developed as part of the Government’s four phased approach to firearms reform. It provides regulatory relief to the operators of shooting clubs and ranges; while making sure the necessary tools remain in place to ensure public safety,” Mrs McKee says.

    The Act introduces several key changes to Part 6 of the Arms Act which include:

    • A new simpler enrolment system for non-pistol shooting clubs and ranges;
    • Decreased barriers to operating temporary non-pistol ranges;
    • Clarification on the timing of inspections; and
    • A range of minor changes to reduce compliance burdens.

    “The changes made to the Act simplify the regulatory requirements on shooting clubs and ranges, while maintaining public safety requirements. This will provide relief to club and range operators, who have struggled to comply with the unnecessary extra regulatory burden.”

    The Act was developed following consultation with members of the clubs and ranges community, firearms safety experts, and community stakeholders, as well as valuable input from the wider public through the Select Committee process. 

    Updates to the Arms Regulations 1992 to reflect the changes made in the Act are expected to come into effect once the Bill comes into force in three months’ time. 

    “We have listened to the concerns of New Zealanders and worked to create a law that prioritises safety while ensuring responsible licenced firearms owners are treated fairly.

    “This Act forms the second phase of the Government’s four phase approach to firearms reform, which will culminate in a complete rewrite of the Arms Act 1983,” Mrs McKee says.

    MIL OSI New Zealand News