Category: NGOs

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Kenyan farmers, civil society, and advocates take seed fight to court in landmark case for food sovereignty

    Source: Greenpeace Statement –

    Soundbytes: Click here, Photos: Click here

    In the quiet court corridors of Machakos, a storm has been brewing—one not about legal technicalities, but about seeds, sovereignty, and the survival of a farming culture.

    On 20 May, fifteen smallholder farmers from across Kenya stepped into the High Court to challenge the constitutionality of Kenya’s Seed and Plant Varieties Act (Cap. 326), a law they say criminalises their very way of life. The case, supported by Greenpeace Africa, Seed Savers Network, and the Biodiversity and Biosafety Association of Kenya (BIBA), could redefine the country’s agricultural future.

    At the centre of the petition is a clause that forbids the exchange, sale, or use of uncertified seeds, including traditional and indigenous varieties. Farmers argue that these laws, enforced with steep fines and even jail time, target the country’s poorest growers and sever ties to centuries-old seed practices.

    “This law criminalises the legacy of our grandmothers,” said Justus Mwololo, one of the petitioners. “We’re not just defending seeds—we’re defending a whole history of resilience.”

    The courtroom was packed with advocates and farmers alike, many in traditional attire, bearing placards that read: “Our grandmothers fed nations, now you call them criminals?” Outside, the air was charged with chants and song as a peaceful procession marched through Machakos town.

    Inside, the arguments were precise and passionate.

    “The Constitution guarantees the right to culture and food,” said Alvin Munandick, appearing on behalf of Greenpeace Africa. “Seed sharing is not a crime. It’s an ancestral practice.”

    “What these provisions allow is shocking, added Wambugu Wanjohi, representing the Law Society of Kenya. “Seed inspectors are empowered to raid farmers’ homes and seize property. This is a violation of privacy, property rights, and human dignity.”

    The case has rallied broad support from civil society. According to Ann Maina, National Coordinator of BIBA, this legal battle is about much more than seeds.

    “It’s about food security. About biodiversity. About resisting a top-down system that tries to put our food under lock and key, she said.

    Daniel Wanjama, from the Seed Savers Network, pointed out that over 80% of seeds used by Kenyan farmers come from informal, farmer-managed systems.

    “To criminalise this is to criminalise the backbone of our food system,” he warned. “And it puts us all at risk of hunger.”

    The government has yet to formally respond to the petitioners’ claims, but the stakes are already clear. If the court rules in favour of the farmers, it could upend a seed policy landscape long dominated by private agribusiness and shift the power back to communities.

    “This case is a fight for the right to exist as a farmer,” said Penninah Ngahu, another petitioner. “If the government wants more seeds, why not invest in us? We’ve been growing food for generations.”

    As the court adjourned, the date of judgment, 27 November 2025, was etched into the minds of everyone present. For the farmers, it marks not just a legal verdict but a test of Kenya’s constitutional commitment to cultural heritage, food rights, and ecological justice.

    “Seed is life,” said Claire Nasike Akello, food scientist and food sovereignty advocate. “And life cannot be patented, regulated out of reach, or stolen from the hands that feed us.”

    For further information, interviews, or media inquiries, please contact:

    Ferdinand Omondi, Communication and Story Manager, Greenpeace Africa, Email: [email protected], Cell: 0722 505 233

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: UK: Creative industry figures urge Starmer to act against Gaza genocide- ‘you know what is happening’

    Source: Amnesty International –

    116 leading UK and Irish creatives have urged Keir Starmer to act over Israel’s escalating atrocities in Gaza, criticising UK arms exports, settlement trade, and lack of ICC support – open letter 

    Riz Ahmed, Dame Harriet Walker, Maxine Peake, Nish Kumar, Paloma Faith and others condemn UK government inaction on Gaza 

    The Prime Minister must ‘stand up for justice and human rights’ and ‘words are no longer enough; we need to see action’ – Creatives 

    Artists gather outside Downing Street to hold placards urging the PM to act to stop the genocide and human rights abuses in Gaza 

    Over 100 leading voices from across the UK and Ireland’s film, television, and creative industries including Riz Ahmed, Dame Harriet Walker, Maxine Peake, Nish Kumar, Paloma Faith, Juliet Stevenson and many more have united to call on Prime Minister Keir Starmer to take urgent action in response to Israel’s escalating atrocities in Gaza and the wider Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT).   

    In a public letter, the group condemn “all attacks on civilians” but emphasise that as well as Israel’s decades-long military occupation, expansion of illegal settlements, and system of apartheid, Israel is committing genocide against Palestinians in Gaza, as described by Amnesty International in its report “You feel Like You Are Subhuman”.  

    “We are deeply troubled by your lack of meaningful action to help deter Israel’s horrifying and calculated violations of Palestinian rights,” the letter states to the Prime Minister. 

    Since October 2023, more than 20,000 children have reportedly been killed in Gaza. The group point to the use of 2,000lb bombs dropped from F-35 fighter jets – supplied with UK-made components – as part of a devastating campaign that includes siege tactics blocking access to food, water, electricity, and medicine for over two million civilians. 

    “You know what is happening,” they write to the Prime Minister, and state “your Government is failing to fulfil its obligation to prevent the ongoing genocide in Gaza.” 

    The letter also highlights a stark double standard in UK policy: banning imports from Russian-occupied Crimea, while allowing trade with Israeli settlements in the illegally Occupied Palestinian Territory. The International Court of Justice has made clear that countries must not support illegal occupations – including through trade.

    In addition to arms and trade, the group call on the UK government to fully support the International Criminal Court’s investigation into alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity in the region. 

    Their demands include: 

    • An immediate suspension of all UK arms exports to Israel 
    • A ban on trade with illegal Israeli settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territory 
    • Compliance with international legal rulings, including those of the ICJ and ICC 

    The group implores the Prime Minister “to stand up for justice and human rights” and that “words are no longer enough; we need to see action”. 

    Artists gather outside Downing Street to deliver the letter and hold placards urging the PM to act to stop Israel’s genocide and human rights abuses in Gaza. 

    The artists held placards bearing messages from residents of Gaza that capture the urgency and human toll of the crisis: 

    • “I don’t want my child to die hungry” – Gaza Resident, Occupied Gaza 
    • “You may send your child to bring water only for him to return in a body bag” – Gaza Resident, Occupied Gaza 

    These statements are a stark reminder of the daily reality for civilians under Israel’s illegal blockade.  

    About the Signatories 

    This statement by Amnesty International has been endorsed by a coalition of UK-based professionals across the creative industries – filmmakers, actors, writers, artists and cultural leaders – who believe in the power of art, law, and collective voice in the face of injustice. 

    Ahmed Masoud; Aisling Bea; Aiysha Hart; Alan Moore; Alexander McKinnon; Alexei Sayle; Alice Roberts; Alisdair Beckett; King Amrita Acharia; Andrea Arnold Anjli; Mohindra Anneika; Rose Annie Mac; Sir Anish Kapoor CBE; Anoushka Shankar; Dr Ariel Caine; Bernadette O’Brien; Bertie Carvel; President of the Bianca Jagger Human Rights Foundation; Brian Eno; Briony Hannah; Brona C Titley; Charlotte Church; Chipo Chung; David Morrissey; Deborah Frances-White; Declan McKenna; Denise Gough; Emma D’Arcy; Esther Freud; Esther Manito; Fionn O’Loinsigh; Francesca Martinez; Frankie Boyle; Frederico Gaggio; Grace Petrie; Dame Harriet Walter; Himesh Patel; Ian Rickson; Imran Yusuf; Indeyarna Donaldson-Holness; Inua Ellams MBE; Ivor Graeme; Jackie Clune; James Acaster; Jan Pearson; Janie Dee; Jason Fleming; Jay Griffiths; Jen Brister; Jessica Fostekew; Jim Loach; John Higgs; Josie Long; Jolyon Rubinstein; Juliet Stevenson CBE; Kathy Lette; Kerry Godliman; Khalid Abdalla; Ken Loach; Lise Meyer; Lolly Adefope; Louisa Young; Love Ssegga; Mae Martin; Mahtab Hussain; Manjinder Virk; Mariam Haque; Marnie Dickens; Max Porter; Maxine Peake; Dr Michael Hrebeniak; Misan Harriman; Mystery Jets; Nadia Sawalha; Nicola Thorp; Nikesh Patel; Nikesh Shukla; Nikita Gill; Nimmi Harasgama; Nish Kumar; Paapa Essiedu; Paloma Faith; Paul Laverty; Penny Woolcock; Peter Wyer; Rebecca O’Brien; Rida Hamidou; Riz Ahmed; Robin Ince; Robin Morrissey; Roger Hartley; Roisin O’Loughlin; Ruth Lass; Salena Godden; Sam Spruell; Sara Masry; Sarah Agha; Sasha Behar; Selma Dabbagh; Shazia Mirza; Simon Rix; Sonali Bhattacharyya; Stewart Lee; Steve Coogan; Susan Lynch; Suzi Ruffell; Thomas Browne; Thomas Combes; Thusitha Jayasundera; Tobias Menzies; Dame Tracey Emin; Tracey Seaward; Vijay Mistry; Vivian Munn; Young Fathers (all members); Zainab Hassan 

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Life of a firefly

    Source: Greenpeace Statement –

    When was the last time you saw a field full of fireflies? In Bill Angelo Bontigao’s “Life of a Firefly,” a poem written in his native Bicol, one of Greenpeace Philippines’ youngest activists ruminates on waning innocence, gradual loss, and how our neglect threatens to dim the little lights we take for granted.

    [In Bicolano]

    Buhay kan sarong Aninipot
    ni: Bill Angelo Bontigao

    Pag dulom an kalangitan,
    Warang ilaw hale sa mga kaharungan,
    Oras ko naman para magpahiling kan sakuyang kagayunan.
    Talentong sakong ighahambog sa gabos na insektong naglalayog.

    Hale sa kahoy na Mangga minsan sa dakulang kahoy na Naga.
    Kasabay kan mga Duliduli nagkakanta,
    Sakong iilawan ang lubot asin masayaw na maogma,
    Sarabay kami kan sakong mga amiga asin amigo liwanag samong ibabalangibog.

    Minasayaw nin pantomina, cha-cha asin minasabay sa tugtug kan gitara.
    Nagsasabay sa taghoy kan paros bahala na kun saen man madara.
    Pag na swetehan ko, sa kamot kan mga aki ako dadarakupon,
    Ihihinghing sako ang mga tugon dangan ako papalayugon.

    Dara ko ang mga kahilingan kan mga kasaradayan,
    habang pasildang na ang aldaw sakuya ining iataman,
    bago ako magkaturog sako ining ipangadyi sa kaitaasan,
    bako man kaya ako ang matupad kundi ang kagurangnan.

    Sa pagmuklat ko liwat kan sakong mga mata,
    Dae ko na bistado ang dating lugar kun saen ako nag-oogma.
    Dae ko na kayang makipagsabayan sa liwanag kan mga dalan,
    Dae ko na namamati ang preskong paros na sakuyang pigduduyanan.

    Dae na ako bistado kan mga kasaradayan,
    Dae na sakong nag-aabang sa mga gilid kan dalan,
    Maski sa mga kanta kan gamo-gamo nata bako na makukusog,
    Nata wara na akong gitarang nadadangog.

    Nata pagmati ko ako nagluluya,
    Siguro oras na para ako maghale na,
    Salamat sa mga oras na naging parte ako kan saimong pagdakula,
    Sa saimong mga maku-apo, ako saimo na sanang iistorya,

    Kun sana ako man makakapaghagad nin tugon saindo,
    kun ako mawara aram ko may mga amigo pa ako,
    Sana sinda atamanon nindo,
    Dae nindo pagpabayaang magpundi ang ilaw nyamo.


    [In Tagalog]

    Buhay ng Isang Alitaptap
    ni: Bill Angelo Bontigao
    Isinalin ni: Karl Orit

    Sa pagdilim ng kalangitan,
    Wala nang ilaw sa mga tahanan,
    Panahon ko na para ipamalas ang alindog kong tangan.
    Ipinagmamalaki sa lahat ng insektong lumilipad ang aking kakayahan.

    Minsan mula sa punòng Mangga, minsan sa punòng Nara.
    Kasabay ng mga umaawit na kuliglig,
    Pinaiilawan ko ang aking puwit at masayang nagsasasayaw,
    Kasabay ng aking mga kaibigan nangungutitap upang magpakitang-gilas.

    Sumasayaw ng pantomina, chacha, at sumasabay sa tugtog ng gitara.
    Sumasabay sa pagsipol ng hangin, bahala na kung saan kami dalhin.
    Kapag sinuwerte, sa kamay ng mga bata ako kukupkupin,
    Makikiusap para sa kanilang pinapangarap bago ako pakawalan muli.

    Bitbit ko ang kanilang mga hiling at ligayang lihim
    Na lubos kong iingatan, hanggang ang araw ay sumilip.
    Bago ako humimbing, magsusumamo ako sa langit,
    Bahala na ang Diyos sa mga katuparang di ko na aabutan.

    Sa aking muling pagdilat,
    Hindi ko na makikilala ang lugar na lunan ng aking sayá.
    Hindi ko na kakáyahing sumabay sa mga nagniningning sa daan,
    Hindi ko na madarama ang maginhawang simoy sa aking pinapasyalan.

    Kahit ang kabataan, hindi na ako kilala,
    Wala nang naghihintay sa akin sa gilid ng lansangan.
    Kahit ang awit ng mga kuliglig ay nawalan na ng sigla,
    Wala na ring naririnig na tugtog ng gitara.

    Nanghihina na yata ako,
    Marahil ito na ang panahon upang mamaalam.
    Salamat sa mga sandaling naging bahagi ako ng iyong paglaki,
    Ikuwento mo sana ako sa iyong magiging mga anak at apóng mumunti.

    At kung maaari, mag-iwan ako ng huling pakiusap sa inyo,
    Kapag wala na ako, alam kong may mga kaibigan pa ako.
    Alagaan din ninyo sana sila
    At huwag ninyo hayaang ang liwanag namin ay tuluyang mapundi.


    [In English]

    The Life of a Firefly
    by: Bill Angelo Bontigao
    Translated by: Pocholo Goitia

    When the sky turns dark,
    And no light shines from nearby houses,
    It is my time to show my beauty.
    Flaunt it to all the other insects soaring through the night.

    Sometimes I’m a glimmer from the Mango tree,
    sometimes from the towering Narra.
    Alongside the cicadas singing their gentle song,
    I light up my tail and dance happily,
    Together with my friends, we shine and show each other’s prowess.

    We sway to pantomina, to cha-cha, to the strum of the guitar,
    We follow the whistle of the wind—wherever it takes us.
    If I’m lucky, a child’s hand might catch me and cradle,
    Whisper to me their wishes before setting me free.

    I carry their desires and secret joys,
    I handle these with care until the slip of first light.
    Before I sleep, I make my own pleas to heaven,
    Not by my light, but by God’s grace, may they be granted.

    When I open my eyes again,
    I will no longer recognize the districts of my happiness.
    I won’t be able to keep up with the city’s shining streets,
    I won’t feel the cool breezes of my old gentle haunts.

    The children don’t know who I am,
    No one waits for me by the roadsides.
    Even the cicada songs have lost vigor,
    The sound of strumming guitars, gone.

    I feel myself growing weak,
    Perhaps it is time for me to leave.
    Thank you for the moments when I was part of your growth,
    Please tell your children and their children my story.

    If I could make one final request:
    I know friends who will remain, even after I go.
    I hope you look after them, as you’ve looked after me,
    Don’t let our light extinguish completely.

    If we continue to allow habitat loss to climate change and pollution, fireflies and other species will fade to memory. By taking action, we can help stem the decline and ensure they remain a part of our world.


    You might want to check out Greenpeace Philippines’ petition called Courage for Climate, a drive in support of real policy and legal solutions in the pursuit of climate justice.

    Courage for Climate

    The climate crisis may seem hopeless, but now is the time for courage, not despair. Join Filipino communities taking bold action for our planet.

    Make an Act of Courage Today!

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Greenpeace response to refusal of North West Shelf reconsideration request

    Source: Greenpeace Statement –

    SYDNEY/PERTH, Thursday 22 May 2025 — In response to the refusal of Greenpeace’s reconsideration request for Woodside’s North West Shelf project extension, Geoff Bice, WA Campaign Lead at Greenpeace Australia Pacific, said: 

    “We are deeply disappointed the impacts to Scott Reef and the threatened species that call it home will not be considered by the Minister in regards to Woodside’s proposal to extend the lifespan of its North West Shelf project. 

    “The primary purpose of Woodside’s North West Shelf extension is to process gas from the Browse gas field underneath Scott Reef — the Minister should be looking at these gas mega projects as a whole, rather than broken into arbitrary pieces.

    “The North West Shelf facility is one of Australia’s dirtiest and most polluting fossil fuel projects — the decision to refuse Greenpeace’s reconsideration request brings Woodside one step closer towards drilling for dirty gas at Scott Reef. 

    “If we are serious about tackling climate pollution and protecting nature, we should be closing down polluting fossil fuel facilities when they come to their end of life, not extending them to allow for new gas fields to open. Greenpeace and our supporters will continue fighting to protect Scott Reef from Woodside’s destructive plans.”

    -ENDS-

    For more information or interviews contact Kate O’Callaghan on 0406 231 892 or [email protected]

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: UN Ocean Conference draft declaration fails to address the ocean crisis

    Source: Greenpeace Statement –

    Paris, France, 22 May 2025 – Greenpeace International is alarmed by the state of the UN Ocean Conference draft declaration which falls far short of expectations, with less than three weeks to the start in Nice, France. Rather than  establishing the ambition shown by states to protect the oceans,the current text – set to be published as the final text of the upcoming conference – lacks the necessary ambition to address the crisis facing the oceans.  

    The third, and supposedly final, draft declaration fails to include the key measures needed to ensure the ocean recovers from decades of abuse and can withstand the impacts of global climate change. 

    Megan Randles, UNOC Head of Delegation for Greenpeace International, said: “We’re shocked after all the fine words from the organisers of this conference to find a declaration text that lacks the ambition needed to protect the oceans. The UN Ocean Conference was supposed to be the moment when governments turned the tide and showcased genuine progress. Instead, we are handed a weak political declaration with glaring omissions and weak language. 

    “The current text makes clear governments once again aren’t serious about protecting the oceans, and are satisfied to say fine words but not deliver real change at sea. It also fails to recognise the rights and leadership of coastal communities and Indigenous Peoples, who are on the frontlines of ocean stewardship. Unless this Declaration is drastically improved, the UN Ocean Conference will become a meaningless talking shop.”

    The glaring omissions or regressions from earlier draft texts are:

    • Pitifully weak language on deep sea mining, with no reference to a moratorium on this dangerous industry, and the removal of any reference to applying the precautionary principle, which appeared in early drafts. [1] 
    • The lack of any urgency on the Global Ocean Treaty ratification, or reflection that the governmental self-set deadline to reach 60 ratifications by this Conference is set to be missed. [2] 
    • Failure to recognise that the Global Ocean Treaty is fundamental to deliver on the 30 by 30 target agreed under the Convention on Biological Diversity, as the Global Ocean Treaty is the only legal tool that can deliver this universally agreed and binding UN target on the high seas, which make ⅔ of the world’s ocean. [3]
    • The absence of a clear reference to the need to reduce plastic production. While there is a brief mention in the text on the development of an internationally binding instrument on plastic, it makes no mention of the need to reduce production.[4]
    • No mention of key issues such as addressing labour and human rights abuses in distant water fishing fleets or ensuring the protection of vulnerable marine ecosystems from the impact of destructive fishing practices – crucial issues that are fundamental to global marine conservation.
    • The removal of a “human rights-based” approach to protecting the oceans which undermines accountability in ocean governance. Otherwise, there is no guarantee that policies will protect the rights of those most dependent on — and essential to — ocean stewardship. This weakens the foundation for just, inclusive, and effective marine protection, and must be urgently addressed.[5]
    • No concrete commitments to additional financial resources.

    From aboard the Rainbow Warrior in the Tasman Sea, Georgia Whitaker, Senior Oceans Campaigner at Greenpeace Australia Pacific, said: “The Australian government has the opportunity to step up and showcase true global leadership on ocean protection at the UN Oceans Conference. The eyes of the world are now on the re-elected Albanese government that signed the Global Ocean Treaty in 2023, but has been dragging its feet, yet to bring its promise into law. We are calling on the Australian government to ratify the Global Ocean Treaty in the first 100 days of government, and propose ocean sanctuaries in the Lord Howe Rise and South Tasman Sea between Australia and Aotearoa-New Zealand, to help protect precious marine life being decimated by brutal industrial fishing.”

    A new analysis released this week by Greenpeace Australia Pacific has revealed the shocking extent of ocean destruction and shark bycatch in the Pacific Ocean in lieu of protection possible under the treaty. 

    “Australia’s approach to deep sea mining will be watched closely by the rest of the world. The Albanese government must join the 33 other countries, including some of our Pacific neighbours, and back a moratorium on deep sea mining to protect our precious blue backyard,” Whitaker added.

    The UN Ocean Conference follows the world’s first deep sea mining application for the international seabed, recently submitted by The Metals Company to the US government, as opposed to the UN regulator, amid high political controversy. This unilateral action undermines the UN, potentially is in violation of international law, and should be condemned by all States at the UN Ocean Conference.

    As of today, 21 countries have ratified the Global Ocean Treaty, and 33 countries support a moratorium on deep sea mining. 

    The United Nations Oceans Conference will be held in Nice, France from 9 – 13 June.

    — ENDS —

    Media contact:

    Magali Rubino, Greenpeace France:  +33 7 78 41 78 78 / [email protected] (CET)

    Kimberley Bernard, Greenpeace Australia Pacific: +61 407 581 404 / [email protected] (AEST) (WhatsApp best)

    Notes for editors: 

    The draft political declaration is available upon request.

    Greenpeace Australia Pacific spokespeople will be available from Nice, Australia and from the Rainbow Warrior in the Tasman Sea.

    [1]  The Zero Draft of the Political Declaration “emphasized the importance of a precautionary approach” in relation to seabed mining. The reference has been deleted from the final draft.

    [2]  The Treaty will only enter into force 120 days after 60 countries have ratified. The UN Secretary-General is required to convene the first meeting of the COP to the Agreement no later than one year after its entry into force. France had targeted for the Global Ocean Treaty to enter into force by the conference.

    [3] Paragraph 21 of the Zero Draft of the Political Declaration stated “We recognise the important role the Agreement will play in achieving 30×30.” That reference has been removed from the final draft.

    [4] The final version of the Political Declaration deletes critical mentions to the urgency of addressing plastics pollution or its human health impacts, which were present in earlier drafts. Astrid Puentes Riaño, Special Rapporteur on the human right to a clean, healthy and sustainable environment, stated on May 20th that “Human rights must be the core of ocean governance and of every ocean pledge”

    [5]  Paragraph 2 of the second version of the Draft Political Declaration stated that “We must act with urgency to face this challenge with bold, ambitious, human rights-based, just and transformative action.” The reference to human-right based actions has been removed.

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Creative industry figures urge Starmer to act against Gaza genocide- ‘you know what is happening’

    Source: Amnesty International –

    116 leading UK and Irish creatives have urged Keir Starmer to act over Israel’s escalating atrocities in Gaza, criticising UK arms exports, settlement trade, and lack of ICC support – open letter 

    Riz Ahmed, Dame Harriet Walker, Maxine Peake, Nish Kumar, Paloma Faith and others condemn UK government inaction on Gaza 

    The Prime Minister must ‘stand up for justice and human rights’ and ‘words are no longer enough; we need to see action’ – Creatives 

    Artists gather outside Downing Street to hold placards urging the PM to act to stop the genocide and human rights abuses in Gaza 

    Over 100 leading voices from across the UK and Ireland’s film, television, and creative industries including Riz Ahmed, Dame Harriet Walker, Maxine Peake, Nish Kumar, Paloma Faith, Juliet Stevenson and many more have united to call on Prime Minister Keir Starmer to take urgent action in response to Israel’s escalating atrocities in Gaza and the wider Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT).   

    In a public letter, the group condemn “all attacks on civilians” but emphasise that as well as Israel’s decades-long military occupation, expansion of illegal settlements, and system of apartheid, Israel is committing genocide against Palestinians in Gaza, as described by Amnesty International in its report “You feel Like You Are Subhuman”.  

    “We are deeply troubled by your lack of meaningful action to help deter Israel’s horrifying and calculated violations of Palestinian rights,” the letter states to the Prime Minister. 

    Since October 2023, more than 20,000 children have reportedly been killed in Gaza. The group point to the use of 2,000lb bombs dropped from F-35 fighter jets – supplied with UK-made components – as part of a devastating campaign that includes siege tactics blocking access to food, water, electricity, and medicine for over two million civilians. 

    “You know what is happening,” they write to the Prime Minister, and state “your Government is failing to fulfil its obligation to prevent the ongoing genocide in Gaza.” 

    The letter also highlights a stark double standard in UK policy: banning imports from Russian-occupied Crimea, while allowing trade with Israeli settlements in the illegally Occupied Palestinian Territory. The International Court of Justice has made clear that countries must not support illegal occupations – including through trade.

    In addition to arms and trade, the group call on the UK government to fully support the International Criminal Court’s investigation into alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity in the region. 

    Their demands include: 

    • An immediate suspension of all UK arms exports to Israel 
    • A ban on trade with illegal Israeli settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territory 
    • Compliance with international legal rulings, including those of the ICJ and ICC 

    The group implores the Prime Minister “to stand up for justice and human rights” and that “words are no longer enough; we need to see action”. 

    Artists gather outside Downing Street to deliver the letter and hold placards urging the PM to act to stop Israel’s genocide and human rights abuses in Gaza. 

    The artists held placards bearing messages from residents of Gaza that capture the urgency and human toll of the crisis: 

    • “I don’t want my child to die hungry” – Gaza Resident, Occupied Gaza 
    • “You may send your child to bring water only for him to return in a body bag” – Gaza Resident, Occupied Gaza 

    These statements are a stark reminder of the daily reality for civilians under Israel’s illegal blockade.  

    About the Signatories 

    This statement by Amnesty International has been endorsed by a coalition of UK-based professionals across the creative industries – filmmakers, actors, writers, artists and cultural leaders – who believe in the power of art, law, and collective voice in the face of injustice. 

    Ahmed Masoud; Aisling Bea; Aiysha Hart; Alan Moore; Alexander McKinnon; Alexei Sayle; Alice Roberts; Alisdair Beckett; King Amrita Acharia; Andrea Arnold Anjli; Mohindra Anneika; Rose Annie Mac; Sir Anish Kapoor CBE; Anoushka Shankar; Dr Ariel Caine; Bernadette O’Brien; Bertie Carvel; President of the Bianca Jagger Human Rights Foundation; Brian Eno; Briony Hannah; Brona C Titley; Charlotte Church; Chipo Chung; David Morrissey; Deborah Frances-White; Declan McKenna; Denise Gough; Emma D’Arcy; Esther Freud; Esther Manito; Fionn O’Loinsigh; Francesca Martinez; Frankie Boyle; Frederico Gaggio; Grace Petrie; Dame Harriet Walter; Himesh Patel; Ian Rickson; Imran Yusuf; Indeyarna Donaldson-Holness; Inua Ellams MBE; Ivor Graeme; Jackie Clune; James Acaster; Jan Pearson; Janie Dee; Jason Fleming; Jay Griffiths; Jen Brister; Jessica Fostekew; Jim Loach; John Higgs; Josie Long; Jolyon Rubinstein; Juliet Stevenson CBE; Kathy Lette; Kerry Godliman; Khalid Abdalla; Ken Loach; Lise Meyer; Lolly Adefope; Louisa Young; Love Ssegga; Mae Martin; Mahtab Hussain; Manjinder Virk; Mariam Haque; Marnie Dickens; Max Porter; Maxine Peake; Dr Michael Hrebeniak; Misan Harriman; Mystery Jets; Nadia Sawalha; Nicola Thorp; Nikesh Patel; Nikesh Shukla; Nikita Gill; Nimmi Harasgama; Nish Kumar; Paapa Essiedu; Paloma Faith; Paul Laverty; Penny Woolcock; Peter Wyer; Rebecca O’Brien; Rida Hamidou; Riz Ahmed; Robin Ince; Robin Morrissey; Roger Hartley; Roisin O’Loughlin; Ruth Lass; Salena Godden; Sam Spruell; Sara Masry; Sarah Agha; Sasha Behar; Selma Dabbagh; Shazia Mirza; Simon Rix; Sonali Bhattacharyya; Stewart Lee; Steve Coogan; Susan Lynch; Suzi Ruffell; Thomas Browne; Thomas Combes; Thusitha Jayasundera; Tobias Menzies; Dame Tracey Emin; Tracey Seaward; Vijay Mistry; Vivian Munn; Young Fathers (all members); Zainab Hassan 

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Aid instrumentalised and health system under fire: Gaza is being deliberately asphyxiated by Israeli forces

    Source: Médecins Sans Frontières –

    • While Israeli authorities let an insufficient amount of aid into Gaza to pretend the siege is over, ground operations continue to damage and put medical facilities out of service.
    • On 19 May, a strike hit Nasser hospital’s compound, damaging the Ministry of Health’s pharmacy store at a time when supplies are already running low.
    • Attacks on medical care must stop now and aid must enter Gaza in sufficient quantities.

    Jerusalem – The insufficient amount of aid being allowed into the Gaza Strip, Palestine, is merely a smokescreen to pretend the siege is over. Meanwhile, at least 20 medical facilities in Gaza have been damaged, or forced partially or completely out of service, in the past week by advancing Israeli ground operations, intensified airstrikes, and widespread evacuation orders. As people remain in desperate need of medical care and aid, Israeli authorities must stop the deliberate asphyxiation of Gaza and the annihilation of its healthcare system, that is underpinning their campaign of ethnic cleansing.

    “The Israeli authorities’ decision to allow a ridiculously inadequate amount of aid into Gaza after months of an air-tight siege signals their intention to avoid the accusation of starving people in Gaza, while in fact keeping them barely surviving,” says Pascale Coissard, Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) emergency coordinator in Khan Younis. “This plan is a way to instrumentalise aid, making it a tool to further Israeli forces’ military objectives.” 

    Before October 2023, 500 aid trucks were entering Gaza every day, according to the UN. The current authorisation for 100 per day, when the situation is so dire, is woefully inadequate.

    Meanwhile, evacuation orders are continuing to uproot people, while Israeli forces are still subjecting health facilities to intensive attacks. 

    On 19 May, between 6 and 6.30am, MSF teams reported hearing almost one strike per minute in Khan Younis. One of these strikes hit the Nasser hospital compound, 100 metres away from the intensive care unit and the inpatient department that are run by MSF. This is the third time in two months that Nasser hospital compound has been struck, once again depriving people of treatment and care. To reduce exposure, our teams were forced to temporarily close both the outpatient department and sedation room for patients awaiting or recovering from surgery, as well as suspend physiotherapy and mental health activities, which are essential for burn patients – most of whom are children.

    The strikes on 19 May also severely damaged the Ministry of Health pharmacy store in Nasser hospital. This puts additional pressure on supplies at a time when medical stocks are running critically low due to the siege.  

    A strike that hit the Nasser hospital compound severely damaged the Ministry of Health pharmacy store. Gaza, Palestine, 20 May 2025.
    MSF

    As part of the expansion of their ground operations, Israeli forces have issued widescale evacuation orders, further limiting people’s access to medical care and MSF’s ability to provide it. On 19 May, for example, an evacuation order covering almost the entire eastern part of Khan Younis, at the edge of Nasser hospital, forced people to immediately move towards Al-Mawasi area.

    The Site Management Cluster estimates that over 138,900 people were forcibly displaced between 15-20 May. The intensified Israeli bombardments and evacuation orders across Khan Younis have forced MSF to maintain only lifesaving activities in the emergency rooms of Al-Attar and Al-Mawasi clinics. Since yesterday, Al-Hakker clinic, in Deir Al-Balah, has also been closed. Before that, MSF teams had been providing more than 350 consultations per day for paediatric, antenatal and post-natal care, psychological first aid and outpatient nutrition treatment among other things.

    A few days earlier, on 15 May, Israeli authorities issued an evacuation order to Sheikh Radwan basic healthcare centre in Gaza City, which led to the closure of the facility. Before that, with MSF’s support, the Ministry of Health teams were providing around 3,000 consultations per day in an area with estimated 250,000 people. This was the last fully functional public basic healthcare clinic in the area.

    According to the Ministry of Health, following the besiege of the Indonesian hospital, all public hospitals in North Gaza are now out of service. The MSF field hospital in Deir Al-Balah has seen its bed capacity rise to 150 per cent over the last few days, forcing us to add additional staff and increase our baseline by 20 beds. According to the UN, there are currently around 1,000 functional hospital beds across the Strip, while bed capacity before the war was 3,500.

    Attacks on civilians and healthcare must stop now and aid must enter Gaza in sufficient quantities and in a way that allows it to reach those who need it. Israel’s allies must exert all their pressure to make this happen as a matter of extreme urgency. Every day that is lost reinforces their complicity in the annihilation of the people of Gaza.

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Woodside’s Browse carbon dumping plans referred to WA EPA by leading environment groups

    Source: Greenpeace Statement –

    PERTH, Monday 19 May 2025 — Greenpeace Australia Pacific and the Conservation Council of WA today confirmed they had lodged a joint referral of Woodside’s high-risk Browse carbon dumping project – also referred to as carbon capture and storage (CCS) – to the Western Australian Environmental Protection Authority (EPA).

    The environment groups state that the ongoing seismic blasting from the carbon dumping project, and risk of CO2 blowouts, would have immediate impacts on Scott Reef and the surrounding ecosystem. They argue that projects posing significant risk of harm to WA’s environment must be referred to the WA EPA for proper assessment. 

    In October 2024, Woodside referred its carbon dumping plans to the federal government but bypassed the WA EPA. Last week the WA EPA announced it would reopen Woodside’s revised Browse gas proposal for public comment — the amended proposal did not include Woodside’s carbon dumping plans. 

    Geoff Bice, WA Campaign Lead at Greenpeace Australia Pacific, said: “Carbon dumping is an expensive distraction corporations use to greenwash their emissions, and a diversion from real action to slash climate pollution.

    “Woodside has tried for years to push through carbon dumping for its highly polluting Browse gas proposal, but the federal environment department highlighted the risks of the new technology to our oceans and marine life, as well as the risk of the injection site failing.

    “Woodside’s carbon dumping plans pose a serious risk to the pristine and fragile Scott Reef and its marine life. It is unacceptable for Woodside to bypass state assessment of its carbon dumping plans given the threat to the WA environment — its plans must be properly assessed by the WA EPA.

    “Ultimately, if we are serious about tackling the climate crisis we must stop emissions before they are produced — carbon dumping has not been proven to work at scale anywhere in the world and must be called out for the false promise it is.”

    Matt Roberts, Executive Director of the Conservation Council of WA, said: “By evading proper, robust environmental assessment of the potential risk this project would pose to the WA marine environment in WA state waters, Woodside is simply attempting to fast-track its approval and bypass due process.”

    “Even in light of revised plans before the WA EPA lodged by Woodside, they are simply tinkering around the edges. In reality, nothing has changed.

    “Carbon dumping is a failed technology — we’ve seen this with Chevron’s Gorgon project where less than 3% of total emissions have been sequestered successfully.There are no examples of carbon pollution dumping that have met dumping targets or been delivered on time or on budget. 

    “Failed offsets should not be used to support the development of new gas projects like Browse. We need much stronger commitments to abate carbon pollution, not false promises of dumping. The only safe way to prevent catastrophic climate change is to phase out the use of fossil fuels in favour of renewable energy.”

    Scott Reef is already subject to multiple environmental pressures, including marine heatwaves, coral bleaching and cyclone activity, driven by the burning of fossil fuels like gas. Woodside’s proposed carbon dumping and gas extraction activities threaten the long-term viability of the reef and the endangered species that rely on it.

    The EPA’s environmental impact assessment (EIA) process is designed to evaluate the potential environmental impacts of proposals, including both direct and indirect (secondary) effects. The WA EPA is required to assess the environmental acceptability of any proposal likely to have a significant effect on the WA environment.

    ENDS

    For more information or interviews, contact Kate O’Callaghan on 0406 231 892 or [email protected]

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Trump admin ends crucial NOAA disaster database

    Source: Greenpeace Statement –

    WASHINGTON, D.C. (May 8, 2025)—Today, the Trump administration announced it would shutter the “weather and climate disasters database,” a crucial tool built by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) that helps the public track extreme weather events. Since 1980, the database has allowed the public to keep track of the costs related to these events. 

    In response, John Noël, Greenpeace USA Deputy Climate Program Director, said: “This is the next escalation in the administration’s all out war on climate action – and everyday people are the ones bearing the brunt. It begs the question: who benefits from not tracking the cost of disasters? 

    “Now, the administration and its cronies are going beyond denying the science to attempting to obscure the consequences. If the government stops tracking the costs of extreme weather events, it becomes easier for the fossil fuel industry and their political allies to deny or downplay climate impacts entirely. 

    “The ultimate goal is to shield oil and gas corporations from accountability for climate damages. But momentum is building nationwide to make polluters pay their fair share, as more states move forward with climate superfund bills and climate litigation. The Trump administration can “archive” this incredibly important data, but they cannot erase real pain and suffering felt by communities experiencing extreme weather events.” 


    Greenpeace USA is part of a global network of independent campaigning organizations that use peaceful protest and creative communication to expose global environmental problems and promote solutions that are essential to a green and peaceful future. Greenpeace USA is committed to transforming the country’s unjust social, environmental, and economic systems from the ground up to address the climate crisis, advance racial justice, and build an economy that puts people first. Learn more at www.greenpeace.org/usa.

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Palestinians in Gaza are being deliberately asphyxiated by Israeli forces News May 20, 2025

    Source: Doctors Without Borders –

    While the war and blockade continue to wreak havoc on Palestinians’ health and leave them in desperate need of medical care and food, water, and other necessities, at least 20 medical facilities in Gaza have been damaged or forced partially or completely out of service in the past week alone amid increasing Israeli military operations, intensified airstrikes, and widespread evacuation orders.

    Israeli authorities must stop the deliberate asphyxiation of Palestinians in Gaza and the annihilation of their health care system—actions that are underpinning their campaign of ethnic cleansing.

    “The Israeli authorities’ decision to allow a ridiculously inadequate amount of aid into Gaza after months of an air-tight siege signals their intention to avoid the accusation of starving people in Gaza, while in fact keeping them barely surviving,” said Pascale Coissard, MSF emergency coordinator in Khan Younis. “This plan is a way to instrumentalize aid, making it a tool to further Israeli forces’ military objectives.”

    On May 19, Israeli forces struck the Nasser Hospital compound in Khan Younis, hitting just 100 meters away from the intensive care unit and inpatient department, which are both run by MSF. It’s the third time in two months that the hospital compound has been struck, yet again depriving people of treatment and care. | Palestine 2025 © MSF

    Nasser Hospital compound struck multiple times

    On May 19, between 6 and 6:30 a.m., MSF teams reported hearing almost one strike per minute in Khan Younis. One of these strikes hit the Nasser Hospital compound, 100 meters away from the hospital’s intensive care unit and the inpatient department, which are run by MSF. This is the third time in two months that the Nasser Hospital compound has been struck, once again depriving people of treatment and care. 

    To reduce the risks, our teams were forced to temporarily close both the outpatient department and sedation room for patients awaiting or recovering from surgery, as well as suspend physiotherapy and mental health activities, which are essential for burn patients—most of whom are children. This strike also severely damaged the Ministry of Health’s pharmacy store in Nasser Hospital. This puts additional pressure on supplies at a time when medical stocks are already running critically low due to the siege.

    The strike on May 19 severely damaged the Ministry of Health’s pharmacy store in Nasser Hospital, putting additional pressure on supplies at a time when medical stocks are already running critically low due to the siege. | Palestine 2025 © MSF

    Ongoing bombings and evacuation orders further limit access to care  

    As part of the expansion of their ground operations, Israeli forces have issued widescale evacuation orders, further limiting people’s access to medical care and MSF’s ability to provide it. On May 19, for example, an evacuation order covering almost the entire eastern part of Khan Younis, at the edge of Nasser Hospital, forced people to immediately move toward the Al-Mawasi area.

    The UN High Commissioner for Refugees’ Site Management Cluster estimates that over 138,900 people were forcibly displaced between May 15-20. The intensified Israeli bombardments and evacuation orders across Khan Younis have forced MSF to maintain only lifesaving activities in the emergency rooms of Al-Attar and Al-Mawasi clinics. Since yesterday, Al-Hekker clinic in Deir al-Balah has also been closed. Before that, MSF teams had been providing more than 350 consultations per day for pediatric, prenatal and post-natal care, psychological first aid, and outpatient nutrition treatment, among other medical issues.

    A few days earlier, on May 15, Israeli authorities issued an evacuation order to Sheikh Radwan basic health care center in Gaza City, which led to the closure of the facility. Before that, with MSF’s support, Ministry of Health teams were providing around 3,000 consultations per day in an area with an estimated 250,000 people. This was the last fully functional public basic health care clinic in the area.

    According to the Ministry of Health, following the besiegement of the Indonesian Hospital, all public hospitals in North Gaza are now out of service. The MSF field hospital in Deir al-Balah has seen its bed capacity rise to 150 percent over the last few days, forcing it to add additional staff and increase their baseline by 20 beds. According to the UN, there are currently around 1,000 functional hospital beds across the Strip, while prior to the war the bed capacity was 3,500. 

    Attacks on civilians and health care must stop now.

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: EU/ ISRAEL: Review of the EU’s relations with Israel welcome but devastatingly late

    Source: Amnesty International –

    Reacting to the EU’s decision to initiate a review of Israel’s compliance with its obligations under international law under the EU-Israel Association Agreement, Eve Geddie the Director of Amnesty International’s European Institutions Office said:

    “While this is a welcome first step, it also comes devastatingly late. The extent of human suffering in Gaza for the past 19 months has been unimaginable. Israel is committing genocide in Gaza with chilling impunity.

    “Emboldened by EU inaction – and even backed by some EU states- Israeli leaders have flaunted their genocidal aims. The EU’s unofficial policy of appeasement towards Israel is contrary to its member states’ obligations and will forever be judged in the annals of history.

    “There is no time to lose, every delay costs human lives in Gaza. The EU and its member states must ban trade and investment that could contribute to the commission of genocide and other grave violations of international law.

    “The EU must suspend all trade with Israeli settlements, while the member states that transfer arms to Israel must suspend such transfers. This is critical if EU member states are to meet their responsibility to prevent genocide and avoid complicity in it.

    “The stakes are too high. If the EU fails to live up to these obligations as a bloc, and seeks to shield itself from its clear legal obligations, its member states must unilaterally suspend all forms of cooperation that may contribute to violations of international law. Amnesty International will now push for a meaningful review which takes evidence and international standards into account.”

    Background

    On 20 May 2025, the European Commission acting on the request supported by 17 member states agreed to conduct a long overdue review to determine whether Israel has violated its obligations under article 2 of the EU-Israel Association Agreement, namely the respect for human rights and democratic principles.

    Amnesty International has long called for EU leaders to review the Association Agreement in line with EU member states’ obligations to prevent trade and investment that contributes to maintaining Israel’s unlawful occupation of the OPT, as set out by the International Court of Justice’s Advisory Opinion of 19 July 2024 and obligations not to render aid or assistance to the commission of crimes under international law.

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Syria: New urgency to end unlawful detention system holding tens of thousands of people following Islamic State defeat

    Source: Amnesty International –

    • Ongoing chaos caused by US humanitarian funding cuts creates dangerous uncertainty
    • New Syrian government and autonomous authorities must address inhumane detention system
    • UN and US-led coalition must support efforts to reduce numbers in camps and facilities

    The mayhem created by recent haphazard US funding cuts must prompt the rapid reduction in the number of people arbitrarily and indefinitely detained in north-east Syria for their perceived affiliation to the Islamic State (IS) armed group, Amnesty International said.

    More than six years after the territorial defeat of IS, the Autonomous Authorities of the North and East Syria Region (autonomous authorities), with the support of the US-led coalition to defeat IS, continue to unlawfully detain tens of thousands of men, women, and children with perceived affiliation to IS in over two dozen detention facilities and in Al-Hol and Roj detention camps. Some of these individuals are survivors of crimes under international law, and trafficking in persons committed by IS. Most people have not been charged or given the opportunity to challenge their detention, and some detainees have been subjected to torture and other ill treatment.

    The Trump administration’s sudden and unprepared funding cuts have created what can only be described as a chaotic situation, characterized by weakened basic services in the camps. As stop-gap resources run out and further cuts loom, camp residents face increased turmoil. Amnesty International’s report last year documented how people in the camps already faced grossly inhumane and life-threatening conditions, with inadequate access to sustenance and healthcare. They have been forced to endure an unstable and often unsafe existence, rife with violence and other criminality. As one 28-year-old woman told Amnesty International: “We are living in terror.”

    It is unconscionable that the Trump administration would further weaken one of the world’s most volatile camps by abruptly terminating funding 

    Agnès Callamard, Amnesty International’s Secretary General

    “The chaos created by the Trump administration’s funding cuts could have catastrophic effects on the tens of thousands of children, women and men detained in north-east Syria,” said Agnès Callamard, Amnesty International’s Secretary General.

    “It is unconscionable that the Trump administration would further weaken one of the world’s most volatile camps by abruptly terminating funding for essential services, leaving an extreme burden on the autonomous authorities and humanitarian actors.”

    In March 2025, Amnesty International spoke with 27 individuals – including humanitarian and non-governmental organizations, representatives of the autonomous authorities, and residents of Al-Hol and Roj camps – regarding the future of the detention system.

    US funding cuts

    On 20 January, the Trump administration announced a pause in foreign assistance. The arbitrary, abrupt, and unpredictable issuing of stop-work orders by US Secretary of State Marco Rubio led to chaos in Al-Hol.

    The camp is coordinated by Blumont, a US-based NGO which receives US foreign assistance. On the morning of 25 January, Jihan Hanan, a representative of the autonomous authorities and the camp’s manager, discovered that none of the approximately 300 US-funded Blumont staff had arrived to work, including security staff who guarded offices and warehouses.

    A repatriation trip for about 600 Iraqis in Al-Hol had been scheduled with the Iraqi authorities that day. As Blumont manages a database on camp residents, Hanan was forced to break in to the Blumont offices to facilitate the repatriations. Warehouses containing items such as gas for cooking and bread were reportedly looted.

    In order to continue delivery of food and water, the autonomous authorities relied on help from other NGOs, and hired an estimated 40 security guards to protect offices in the camp. Blumont was granted a waiver by the US government a few days after the freeze, restoring some of its funding. In April, however, the US also cut funding for 24 hours to an NGO delivering food to the camp, an action the Trump administration later called a mistake.

    As of 4 March, the latest figures available, the US government had cut at least $117 million worth of humanitarian assistance allocated to projects in north-east Syria, although some funding has since been reinstated.  Interviewees told Amnesty International they were concerned about decreasing health services in Al-Hol, including the closure of health centres and fewer ambulances for emergency services; and the loss of programming in so-called rehabilitation facilities for boys forcibly separated from their families in the camps.

    Programmes supporting people leaving Al-Hol, including within Syria, were also affected. Before the funding cuts, the autonomous authorities and humanitarian groups already struggled to meet the needs of camp residents.

    Five projects in Roj were also terminated in early March after funding cuts. One camp resident said they had received double their food rations from the World Food Programme and were told it had to last a while, in case of further cuts.

    Some interviewed by Amnesty International expressed significant concerns that IS could recruit within the camps. One humanitarian representative explained: “As services go down in these two camps and people are increasingly hungry, increasingly unable to access basic services, the cry coming from… the inhabitants from Al-Hol and Roj is [to IS], ‘Come and get us’.” Highlighting the threat, in mid-April the autonomous authorities carried out a security campaign in Al-Hol camp because of what they described as an “increase in attempts to smuggle Daesh [IS] families [and] continued [IS] recruitment operations”.

    Even as some funding for Al-Hol is reinstated, the uncertainty created by the cuts has caused irreparable harm to various projects. One humanitarian representative explained that once staff contracts are terminated, the process of re-hiring and bringing programmes back is challenging. US funding cuts have also precipitated the loss of key staff from the NES Forum, the region’s humanitarian coordinating structure, resulting in some fundamental coordination gaps.

    The UN is gradually taking over some coordination activities, which may raise the visibility of ongoing human rights issues and concerns in the detention system. However, the UN is also facing very large funding challenges, and many NGOs are still unable to access UN funds because they are required to register with the Syrian government in Damascus through a process some groups oppose due to onerous registration requirements.

    Accelerating repatriation and returns from camps

    After years of failing to find a durable solution to the crisis in north-east Syria, the turmoil created by the funding cuts must finally spur urgent action. Recent events – including the fall of the Bashar al-Assad government, growing UN presence in north-east Syria, and increasing diplomatic ties between the Syrian government and states with nationals still detained – could help accelerate an end to the unlawful system of detention.

    Recognizing this change in environment, the autonomous authorities have started work on a plan, in coordination with the UN, to empty the camps of Iraqis and Syrians in 2025. These groups comprise about 80% of the 36,000 people in Al-Hol, with the remainder from an estimated 60 other countries.

    In January 2025, the autonomous authorities announced that they would facilitate the voluntary return of Syrians detained in Al-Hol to their hometowns. Most of the remaining 16,000 Syrians in the camp are from areas that previously were under control of the Assad government or armed opposition groups.

    In the last year Iraq’s government has significantly increased the pace of repatriations, and, as of March 2025, returned over 5,600 individuals from Al-Hol camp – close to half the people Iraq has repatriated from Al-Hol since 2021.

    The departure of camp residents from Al-Hol is welcome. However, people should not simply be transferred from one detention centre to another, such as to the Al-Jed’ah Centre in Iraq, where Amnesty International last year documented torture and enforced disappearance.

    Recommendations

    The new Syrian government, autonomous authorities, US-led coalition, and the UN must identify long-overdue solutions to the crisis.

    Among the most urgent priorities is the need to downsize the camps. Before families can leave the camps, children and young adults separated from their families should be reunited. There should be investment in programmes in Iraq and Syria to support the voluntary return, rehabilitation, and reintegration of Iraqis and Syrians, who are not suspected perpetrators of crimes under international law, in their areas of origin. 

    It’s time to finally put an end to this unlawful system of detention

    Agnès Callamard

    “It’s time to finally put an end to this unlawful system of detention. As the US prepares to downsize its military presence in Syria, the people still living in these camps must not be abandoned,” said Agnès Callamard.

    “States with nationals in north-east Syria should immediately charter flights to finally bring home child citizens, their carers, and potential victims of trafficking.

    Any remaining adults should be screened to identify which individuals should be investigated and prosecuted for crimes committed under international law or serious crimes under domestic law. Everyone else should be released, and the Syrian government and other countries should help resettle those unable to return home.”

    Victims of crimes committed by IS deserve justice. Even if individuals are repatriated for trials, a residual group of Syrians and foreigners who cannot return home will remain. The new Syrian government, with the support of the autonomous authorities and international community, must initiate a plan for trials that meet international standards.

    Background

    About 46,500 Syrians, Iraqis, and other foreign nationals remain in the detention camps and facilities. The majority are women and children. Among the men held in the detention facilities, between 2,000 to 3,100 foreigners and about 2,000 Syrians have yet to be tried.

    Following the fall of al-Assad and the establishment of an interim government in Syria, the Syrian Democratic Forces, one of the groups that make up the autonomous authorities, signed an agreement on 10 March 2025 that “all civil and military institutions in northeastern Syria” should be merged “into the administration of the Syrian state”. This merger may include administration of the detention camps and facilities in the north-east.

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Azerbaijan: Jail sentence against opposition leader Tofig Yagublu upheld in “sham court hearing”

    Source: Amnesty International –

    Reacting to the Baku Court of Appeal’s decision to uphold the nine-year prison sentence against Azerbaijani opposition figure Tofig Yagublu, Marie Struthers, Amnesty International’s Eastern Europe and Central Asia Director, said:

    “It is abundantly clear that Tofig Yagublu’s imprisonment is a political decision. This was not justice – it was another sham court hearing and part of the systematic repression of dissent in Azerbaijan. His ongoing detention is based on fabricated charges, as with many other jailed government critics.”

    Background

    Tofig Yagublu, a veteran opposition politician and member of the Musavat Party and National Council of Democratic Forces, was convicted in March on charges of “fraud” and “forgery,” which he has rejected as politically motivated. He went on a hunger strike from 1 April which he ended after 40 days.  Amnesty International has demanded that the authorities transfer him to an independent, specialized hospital, to ensure that he receives the healthcare he requires.

    For further information about his case, see here.

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: UK: New Government response a step forward but still inadequate in the face of Israel’s genocide, occupation, and apartheid

    Source: Amnesty International –

    In response to the UK government’s announcement that it will suspend free trade agreement negotiations with Israel and impose sanctions on settlers, Sacha Deshmukh, Amnesty International UK’s Chief Executive, said:

    “Stronger language and some new measures announced today are welcome albeit long overdue, but the UK government’s response is still inadequate to compel Israel to change course.          

    “Pausing trade negotiations, which Israel claims weren’t progressing anyway, will sadly not pressure Israel to alter its illegal actions. Similarly, sanctioning a few individual settlers, instead of banning all settlement goods, will do little to shift Israel’s approach. 

    “The UK must immediately stop all arms transfers to Israel, including components for F-35 fighter jets currently decimating Gaza. It should also ban investment in companies and banks that maintain Israel’s unlawful occupation and apartheid system and prohibit imports from illegal settlements.

    “For countless Palestinians, this may be the final breath of freedom. This is a moment for the UK government to use every political, judicial, and diplomatic lever at its disposal to help bring an end to the Israeli government’s genocide, apartheid, and occupation.”

    View latest press releases

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Campaigners stage ‘oil spill’ at Shell HQ to mark AGM and demand justice

    Source: Amnesty International –

    Striking visual protest staged by Amnesty UK, Fossil Free London, and Justice 4 Nigeria coalition coincides with Shell’s AGM

    This morning, activists from Amnesty International UK, Fossil Free London, and the Justice 4 Nigeria coalition staged a powerful protest outside Shell’s global headquarters in central London, demanding accountability for decades of oil pollution in Nigeria’s Niger Delta.

    Timed to coincide with Shell’s AGM – held in a Heathrow hotel protected by a court injunction against environmental protesters – the stunt featured dramatic visuals symbolising the ongoing environmental devastation Shell has caused.

    Campaigners in suits emblazoned with a flaming Shell logo poured fake oil onto a giant map of the Niger Delta. Seated protesters, wearing T-shirts reading “Decades of Oil Spills”, “Polluted Waters”, and “Devastated Communities”, represented those whose lives have been severely impacted by Shell’s operations. A striking red location pin declared: “It’s Hell in the Niger Delta”, while banners demanded: “Shell: Own up, Clean up, Pay up.”

    The protest drew strong media interest and public attention during the busy morning commute as Shell staff arrived for work.

    Shell’s operations in the Niger Delta have led to severe pollution of water, soil, and air, affecting the health and livelihoods of millions. Despite billions in profits and repeated court rulings, Shell has failed to adequately clean up the region or compensate those affected. Just this year, over 13,500 residents from Ogale and Bille filed claims against Shell in the UK High Court.

    Peter Frankental, Amnesty International UK’s Business and Human Rights Director, said:

    “Today’s protest was a stark reminder that Shell cannot simply wash its hands of decades of environmental devastation. Communities in the Niger Delta have suffered catastrophic harm – contaminated water, poisoned land, and shattered livelihoods – while Shell continues to make billions in profit.

    “The frustration and anger on display this morning reflect a wider truth: Shell must be held to account. It cannot walk away. The company must clean up its toxic legacy and provide full compensation to those whose lives it has wrecked.”

    Lazarus Tamana, Justice 4 Nigeria coalition co-founder, said:

    “Shell still refuses to clean up and pay up after so many years of Niger Delta people highlighting the damage Shell has caused. How is it still necessary for us to be here and call on Shell to clean up its mess? They have devastated our water, land, health and livelihoods and we continue to fight for justice.

    Shell admitted liability for their oil pollution in 2014, yet the Bodo community has had to drag Shell back to the courts here in London, just to get them to clean up. They must be held to account and compensate all affected communities.”

    Robin Wells, Director of Fossil Free London, said:

    “Year after year we have hit the front pages or millions of social media views holding Shell to account at their AGM, and we are sick to the back teeth. We’re not only sick of the devastation they cause, but we are sick of a system which rewards them handsomely for tearing down these fragile ecosystems that keep us all alive.

    Communities in the Niger Delta were some of the first to bear the brunt and we stand in solidarity with them as they fight for justice, but, make no mistake, like a Mexican wave of disaster, soon this climate meltdown will impact every single one of us.”

    Shell must not be allowed to walk away from its liabilities for the environmental destruction it has caused. Niger Delta communities will continue to demand full clean-up and compensation for the decades of harm that Shell has inflicted.

    For images contact the press office

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: EU: New ‘safe third country’ proposals cynical attempt to downgrade rights and offload asylum responsibilities

    Source: Amnesty International –

    Responding to the European Commission’s proposal to amend the ‘safe third country’ concept by allowing EU member states to forcibly send people seeking asylum to countries where they have no connection, without the possibility to appeal from the EU, Olivia Sundberg Diez, Amnesty International’s EU Advocate on Migration and Asylum, said:

    “Instead of spending endless time and resources offloading its responsibilities to other countries, the EU should invest in its own asylum systems and let people seeking asylum start rebuilding their lives.

    “These proposals are yet another cynical attempt to evade the EU’s refugee protection responsibilities, shifting them to countries with fewer resources and less capacity to offer lasting protection. Sending people to countries to which they have no connection, no support and no prospects, or may have only briefly transited through, is not only chaotic and arbitrary, but also devastating on a human level.

    “Let’s be clear: This revision would only further weaken access to asylum in Europe, downgrade people’s rights, and increase the risk of refoulement and of widespread arbitrary detention in third countries – especially in light of the EU’s increasingly evident inability to monitor and uphold respect for human rights in its partner countries.”

    Background

    The ‘safe third country’ concept allows states to reject an asylum application as inadmissible when it is deemed that an applicant could have sought international protection in a third country. This is an exception to the general practise of international refugee law, by which the country in which a person applies for international protection bears primary responsibility for assessing their application.

    Amnesty International has long criticized this concept, which European states have often used to shirk their obligations, even as UNHCR data shows that 71% of refugees worldwide are hosted in low- and middle-income countries.

    EU states remain obliged to conduct an individual assessment of whether the third country is safe for that person and to ensure that every applicant can access a fair asylum process, have their case heard, and rebut any evidence from the returning state.

    The European Commission’s proposal removes the requirement that a meaningful link exist between the asylum seeker and that third country. Instead, mere transit or the existence of an agreement between the EU member state and the third country would suffice. It also removes the suspensive effect of appeals, meaning that people could still be forcibly transferred to that country before their appeal has been heard. This reform goes hand in hand with the recently proposed Return Regulation. Taken together, these amount to an alarming attempt to externalize refugee protection and migration control far from Europe’s borders.

    This proposed amendment to the Asylum Procedures Regulation will now be negotiated and would need to be approved by the European Council and the European Parliament.

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Reaction to 2025 Global Report on Food Crises: Oxfam warns of “a world veering off course, starving by design”

    Source: Oxfam –

    Today’s “2025 Global Report on Food Crises” (GRFC), led by the Food Security Information Network (FSIN), says that 295 million people around the world are now experiencing acute hunger – twice as many as in 2020 and marking the sixth consecutive annual increase. 

    Reacting to the report, Oxfam Global Food and Economic Security Lead, Emily Farr, said:   

    “This evidence presents an unflinching picture of a world veering off course. Hunger is no longer just a tragic byproduct of conflict—it is increasingly being wielded as its very weapon. In Gaza, Israel’s bombing campaign, forced displacement, and siege have engineered the conditions for famine, while in Sudan, food stockpiles spoil at the borders while communities starve. These are not failures of logistics or capacity. They are calculated assaults on civilians through starvation by design, in flagrant violation of international law. 

    “Across the globe, we see the rise of three “lethal Cs”: Cuts, Conflict, and Climate. Together, they’ve fuelled the highest number ever recorded of people experiencing the most severe level of food insecurity. Yet major donor governments continue to gut aid budgets while ramping up military spending and handing tax breaks to billionaires. The world is spending more on bombs than on bread, more on walls than on welfare. The richest grow richer while the poorest are left to starve. 

    “This is not a resource crisis—it’s a political and moral one. And it can be undone. Donor governments must restore life-saving aid, and all States must unequivocally hold those using starvation as a weapon to account. International Humanitarian Law is not optional. This is a test of global leadership and collective conscience.”  

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Oxfam reaction to announcement that Israel will allow a limited amount of aid into Gaza

    Source: Oxfam –

    Reacting to the announcement that Israel will allow a limited amount of aid into Gaza, Wassem Mushtaha, Oxfam’s Gaza Response Lead, said:

    “While some aid was allowed into Gaza today, it will only be a trickle amongst a sea of need. For over 70 days Israel has been starving the people of Gaza, depriving them of food, water, medicine and essential supplies while escalating its cruel and indiscriminate bombing campaign. Two million people are on the brink of famine, and they are not just starving, but also traumatised, sick and displaced from their homes. 

    “The limited entry of aid into Gaza cannot be mistaken for meaningful progress, especially alongside the expansion of Israel’s brutal bombing campaign across the Gaza Strip. It is not a turning point, but at best a narrow concession that seems to reflect mounting international pressure.

    “Oxfam is also concerned about Israel’s plan to take over aid operations. Instead of restoring access, this emerging system centres on restrictive border crossings, military-controlled corridors, and opaque conditions that exclude local and experienced humanitarian organisations and hinder the impartial delivery of aid. 

    Bushra Khalidi, Oxfam’s Policy lead in the Occupied Palestinian Territory and Gaza, said:

    “What is urgently needed is not new obstacles on the ground, but for all crossings to be opened to allow a full and proper humanitarian response, that allows real access, with safe corridors and respect for international humanitarian law, a call mirrored by 22 donor countries and the EU, in a joint statement released earlier today. These are factors we also hope will be at the forefront of discussions when the EU Foreign Affairs Council meets on Tuesday the 20th to address the need to review the EU IL association agreement based on a lack of compliance with human rights and humanitarian law.

    “A token convoy does not equal progress, only sustained, accountable access through every crossing will end the impunity that keeps aid from flowing. We must also see an end to the relentless bombing and attacks on Palestinian people, with an urgent and permanent ceasefire, alongside justice and accountability for all.”

    Joint donor statement from 25 aid partners published yesterday.

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: “A devastating record”: New Greenpeace analysis reveals almost half a million blue sharks caught as bycatch in Central and Western Pacific in 2023

    Source: Greenpeace Statement –

    TASMAN SEA, Tuesday 20, May 2025 – A new analysis of latest fisheries data by Greenpeace Australia Pacific has revealed widespread devastation of near-threatened sharks in the Pacific Ocean by industrial longline fishers. The analysis estimates that almost half a million blue sharks were caught as bycatch in the region in 2023, the highest number in recorded history since 1991.

    Greenpeace Australia Pacific estimates around 438,500 near-threatened blue sharks, almost 50 million kilograms, were caught as bycatch in the region in 2023 from Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission (WFCPFC) data. The figure is double 2015 numbers.

    Georgia Whitaker, Senior Campaigner at Greenpeace Australia Pacific, said: 

    “The data is deeply disturbing – it’s a devastating record and a testament to the destructive nature of the industrial fishing industry. Sharks and other animals dying by the hundreds of thousands a year in this one patch of ocean, brutally killed by a legal and indiscriminate fishing practice like longlining. This is an appalling legacy our global leaders are leaving while the blue lungs of our planet are already facing chronic decline. Industrial fishing is sucking our ocean dry, fuelling the biodiveristy crisis, and pushing prehistoric animals like sharks to the brink of extinction. Healthy shark populations are central to a healthy ocean – this is a loss we can’t afford.”

    The blue shark is by far the most common bycatch in the region and the world, making up 80-90% of all shark catches across the WCPFC in the last nine years. Between Australia and New Zealand in the Tasman Sea region, blue sharks made up more than 90% of the shark bycatch from longline fishers.

    Ahead of the United Nations Oceans Conference in Nice, France in June, Greenpeace Australia Pacific is calling on the Albanese government to ratify the Global Ocean Treaty in the first 100 days in government and protect the region. Australia signed the treaty in 2023 but is yet to bring it into force.

    “There is no better time for Australia to be leaders in ocean protection on the world stage. Every day that passes without the treaty in force, animals are being pushed closer to the brink of extinction from industrial fisheries in the high seas. The Global Ocean Treaty was a historic win, but we can’t rest now – we need Australia to ratify the treaty and propose ocean sanctuaries in the high seas between Australia and New Zealand to give our oceans and marine life a chance to rest, recover and thrive,” Whitaker said.

    A recent report by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUNC) revealed one-third of sharks worldwide are endangered, and two-thirds of those endangered are at risk of extinction from overfishing. Blue Sharks are listed as Near Threatened and Largely Depleted by the IUCN. 

    The analysis also revealed the biologically significant area of the Lord Howe Rise and South Tasman Sea areas, between Australia and New Zealand, had some of the highest rates of birds as bycatch, with 13% of bycatch from longliners being seabirds like albatross. 

    —ENDS—

    For more information or to arrange an interview, please contact Kimberley Bernard on +61 407 581 404 or [email protected]

    Notes to Editor

    High res images and footage of Australia’s oceans can be found here and here

    Full analysis available at request

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Amnesty International call for prevent duty to be scrapped

    Source: Amnesty International –

    – On National Children’s Day, Amnesty International called for the controversial Prevent duty to be scrapped

    – Amnesty took their message directly to delegates at the Education World Forum

    – 40% of people reported to the UK government’s “Prevent” duty are between 11-15 years old. The vast majority do not meet the criteria for intervention.

    On National Children’s Day, Amnesty’s Children’s Human Rights Network called for the UK to scrap the controversial Prevent duty. They took their message directly to delegates at the Education World Forum, a prestigious gathering of global education ministers, hosted by the Department of Education. 

    Members of the network held signs saying “No “Prevent” duty in our Schools”, “Students not Suspects”, “Teachers not Spies” and more, and gave out information to show how Prevent violates people’s rights in the UK and negatively impacts children’s education.

    The UN has called for the suspension of Prevent and has recognised its role in human rights violations [1]. 

    Amnesty’s research has shown that 93% of people reported to the “Prevent” duty do not meet the criteria for intervention, meaning they’re not at risk of being drawn into terrorism. Nevertheless 40% of people reported to the UK government’s “Prevent” duty are between 11-15 years old and 297 children under 10 have been reported to the UK government’s “Prevent” duty.

    Amnesty’s research has found examples including 11-year-old Zain, who was referred by his school. During a fire drill, he said he hoped the school “burned down”. Zain had told the school the comment was a “joke” because he was “stressed with the homework” and school rules.

    Ilyas Nagdee, Amnesty International UK’s Racial Justice Director, said: “The Prevent Duty is a dangerously broken system and is having a chilling effect on the lives and freedoms of thousands of innocent children. Under 15-year-olds make up over 40% of those reported which can severely impact their lives and futures. Yet in the vast majority of cases they don’t meet the criteria for intervention.

    One of the key issues is the distrust Prevents builds from students with the very teachers and staff they should be able to go to for care and guidance. Moreover, it causes many self-censor out of fear of being reported. This includes modifying their behaviour, refraining from joining campaigning groups and attending protests or expressing their religious and political views.

    The Government should listen to the UN and recognise that the Prevent Duty is a human rights violation and suspend it immediately.”

    1]https://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/15/treatybodyexternal/TBSearch.aspx?Lang=en&TreatyID=6&CountryID=185

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Russia: ‘No authoritarian assault will silence our fight for justice’ – Amnesty responds to Kremlin ban

    Source: Amnesty International –

    Russian authorities have declared Amnesty International an ‘undesirable organisation’

    The decision comes three years after Russian authorities blocked access to Amnesty’s websites and shut down its Moscow office

    ‘You must be doing something right if the Kremlin bans you’ says Amnesty International’s Secretary General Agnès Callamard

    Reacting to the news that the Russian authorities have declared Amnesty International an “undesirable organisation” thereby criminalising its activities and any association with the organisation in Russia, Agnès Callamard, Amnesty International’s Secretary General, said: 

    “This decision is part of the Russian government’s broader effort to silence dissent and isolate civil society. In a country where scores of activists and dissidents have been imprisoned, killed or exiled, where independent media has been smeared, blocked or forced to self-censor, and where civil society organisations have been outlawed or liquidated, you must be doing something right if the Kremlin bans you.  

    “The authorities are deeply mistaken if they believe that by labelling Amnesty “undesirable” we will stop our work documenting and exposing human rights violations – quite the opposite. We will not give in to the threats and will continue undeterred to work to ensure that people in Russia are able to enjoy their human rights without discrimination. We will keep documenting and speaking worldwide about the war crimes committed in Ukraine by Russia. We will redouble our efforts to expose Russia’s egregious human rights violations both at home and abroad.  

    “We will never stop fighting for the release of prisoners of conscience detained for standing up for human rights or for the repeal of repressive laws that prevent people in Russia from speaking up against injustice. We will continue to work relentlessly to ensure that all those who are responsible for committing grave human rights violations, whether in Russia, Ukraine, or elsewhere, face justice. Put simply, no authoritarian assault will silence our fight for justice. Amnesty will never give up or back down in its fight for upholding human rights in Russia and beyond.” 

    Amnesty ban in Russia

    On 19 May, the Russian Prosecutor General’s Office declared Amnesty International an “undesirable organisation” under repressive 2015 Russian legislation which allows the authorities to ban arbitrarily any foreign organisation and criminalise its activities in Russia. The announcement accused Amnesty of promoting “Russophobic projects” and indicated that it was prompted by Amnesty’s work on freedom of expression and association in Russia, and its documentation and exposition of crimes under international law committed by Russian forces in Ukraine. The decision is based on a Russian law which in itself violates international law, and the language of the decision goes against facts accusing Amnesty of activities which, within its statutory documents and policies, it is prevented from undertaking.

    The designation comes three years after the Russian authorities blocked access to Amnesty’s websites in Russia and de-registered – effectively closed down – the organisation’s office in Moscow. The designation puts at risk of prosecution in Russia partner organisations and individual supporters, journalists, other persons who now work with, or are seen by the authorities as supporting or promoting the organisation.

    Under Russian legislation, participation in the activities of an “undesirable organiation” is punishable by law. First-time “offenses” may result in administrative fines of up to 15,000 rubles (around US$185). Repeated violations as well as funding or managing such organisations carry criminal liability and can lead to prison sentences of up to six years. The law has previously been applied to the distribution or reposting of any materials from the designated organisation, including publications and hyperlinks predating its designation as “undesirable”.

    This designation places Amnesty among dozens of independent NGOs and media outlets that have been targeted in recent years as part of a sweeping campaign to suppress dissent and dismantle civil society in Russia and prevent international watchdogs and partners from providing support or showing solidarity with them. These moves are the backbone of a pattern whereby the Russian authorities are using authoritarian practices to silence voices, undermine accountability and entrench power.

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Russia: Amnesty International declared “undesirable organization” amid escalating crackdown on dissent  

    Source: Amnesty International –

    Reacting to the news that the Russian authorities have declared Amnesty International an “undesirable organization” thereby criminalizing its activities and any association with the organization in Russia, Agnès Callamard, Amnesty International’s Secretary General, said: 

    “This decision is part of the Russian government’s broader effort to silence dissent and isolate civil society. In a country where scores of activists and dissidents have been imprisoned, killed or exiled, where independent media has been smeared, blocked or forced to self-censor, and where civil society organizations have been outlawed or liquidated, you must be doing something right if the Kremlin bans you.  

    “The authorities are deeply mistaken if they believe that by labelling our organization “undesirable” we will stop our work documenting and exposing human rights violations – quite the opposite. We will not give in to the threats and will continue undeterred to work to ensure that people in Russia are able to enjoy their human rights without discrimination. We will keep documenting and speaking worldwide about the war crimes committed in Ukraine by Russia. We will redouble our efforts to expose Russia’s egregious human rights violations both at home and abroad.  

    The authorities are deeply mistaken if they believe that by labelling our organization “undesirable” we will stop our work documenting and exposing human rights violations – quite the opposite

    Agnès Callamard, Amnesty International’s Secretary General

    “We will never stop fighting for the release of prisoners of conscience detained for standing up for human rights or for the repeal of repressive laws that prevent people in Russia from speaking up against injustice. We will continue to work relentlessly to ensure that all those who are responsible for committing grave human rights violations, whether in Russia, Ukraine, or elsewhere, face justice. Put simply, no authoritarian assault will silence our fight for justice. Amnesty will never give up or back down in its fight for upholding human rights in Russia and beyond.” 

    Background 

    On 19 May 2025, the Russian Prosecutor General’s Office declared Amnesty International an “undesirable organization” under repressive 2015 Russian legislation which allows the authorities to ban arbitrarily any foreign organization and criminalize its activities in Russia. The announcement accused Amnesty International of promoting “Russophobic projects” and indicated that it was prompted by the organization’s work on freedom of expression and association in Russia, and its documentation and exposition of crimes under international law committed by Russian forces in Ukraine. The decision is based on a Russian law which in itself violates international law, and the language of the decision goes against facts accusing Amnesty International of activities which, within its statutory documents and policies, it is prevented from undertaking.

    The designation comes three years after the Russian authorities blocked access to Amnesty International’s websites in Russia and de-registered – effectively closed down – the organization’s office in Moscow. The designation puts at risk of prosecution in Russia partner organizations and individual supporters, journalists, other persons who now work with, or are seen by the authorities as supporting or promoting, the organization.

    Under Russian legislation, participation in the activities of an “undesirable organization” is punishable by law. First-time “offenses” may result in administrative fines of up to 15,000 rubles (around US$185). Repeated violations as well as funding or managing such organizations carry criminal liability and can lead to prison sentences of up to six years. The law has previously been applied to the distribution or reposting of any materials from the designated organization, including publications and hyperlinks predating its designation as “undesirable”.

    This designation places Amnesty International among dozens of independent NGOs and media outlets that have been targeted in recent years as part of a sweeping campaign to suppress dissent and dismantle civil society in Russia and prevent international watchdogs and partners from providing support or showing solidarity with them. These moves are the backbone of a pattern whereby the Russian authorities are using authoritarian practices to silence voices, undermine accountability and entrench power.

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: India: Authorities should immediately terminate ‘unwarranted’ investigation and release Professor Ali Khan Mahmudabad

    Source: Amnesty International –

    Responding to the arrest of Professor Ali Khan Mahmudabad in Delhi, India, for ‘sedition’ following his social media post, Aakar Patel, chair of board at Amnesty International India, said:

    “The Haryana police must stop treating Professor Ali Khan Mahmudabad like a criminal simply for expressing an opinion. The shameful arrest of the Professor for a social media post seeking support for justice for victims of lynching and ‘bulldozer injustice’ in the country is a violation of his rights to freedom of expression and liberty.

    “Accusing Professor Ali Khan Mahmudabad of sedition and other charges is not only absurd and completely unwarranted but also shows how authorities have been consistently misusing the law to target anyone who has a critical view in the country. Section 152 of the Indian criminal code, Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), which the professor has been accused of, is nothing but a new version of the old sedition law which the Supreme Court had stayed in 2022. In its new avatar, the law is once again being used to censor critical voices and create a climate of fear.  

    “The Indian government should urgently repeal this pernicious legislation and comply with their international human rights obligations. The Haryana Police must immediately release Professor Ali Khan Mahmudabad and terminate the investigation against him.”

    The Haryana police must stop treating Professor Ali Khan Mahmudabad like a criminal simply for expressing an opinion.

    Aakar Patel, chair of board at Amnesty International India

    Background:

    Ali Khan Mahmudabad is an associate professor and the head of political science department at Ashoka University in India. On 8 May, in a social media post he said that he was glad to see right-wing praise for Colonel Sophia Qureishi, who was one of the Indian armed forces spokespersons for media briefings on Operation Sindoor, but they should also speak up for ‘victims of mob lynchings, arbitrary bulldozing’ and the ruling-party ‘BJP’s hate mongering.’

    The Haryana State Women’s Commission, however, accused the professor of attempting to “vilify national military actions”. Based on this along with a BJP Youth Wing leader’s complaint, the Haryana police filed a report against the Professor based on articles 152 (sedition), 353 (statements conducing to public mischief) and 79 (word, gesture or act intended to insult modesty of a woman) of the BNS.

    Professor Ali Mahmudabad was arrested on 18 May from his Delhi residence and currently subject to 2-day police custody. He has defended his comments and said that they had been misunderstood.

    Last year, the Rajasthan High Court had ruled against the misuse of Section 152 to suppress legitimate dissent

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: UK: Government urged to disclose genocide risk assessments on Gaza – MP letter

    Source: Amnesty International –

    65 signatories from nine different political parties and independent parliamentarians sign open letter demanding transparency amid escalating mass atrocities in Gaza

    Letter also expresses alarm at the Government’s position in the London High Court hearing on UK arms exports to Israel

    Amnesty International’s research has found sufficient basis to conclude that Israel has committed and is continuing to commit genocide against Palestinians in the occupied Gaza Strip

    ‘If these subsequent assessments have not led you to conclude that there is a serious risk of genocide in Gaza, triggering your obligation to prevent, we must ask how adequate your assessments are’ – MPs

    Over sixty parliamentarians including Baroness Kennedy, Kit Malthouse, Baroness Warsi, Jeremy Corbyn, Alistair Carmichael, Carla Denyer are issuing an open letter to Prime Minister Keir Starmer, calling for the immediate release of the UK government’s assessments on the risk of genocide in Gaza.

    The letter follows a statement by the Minister for the Middle East on 6 May, confirming in parliament that the Government is conducting “ongoing assessments” of the risk of genocide. Yet, the only assessment disclosed to date – made public during the London High Court hearing [Al-Haq v Secretary of State] on UK arms exports to Israel – concluded in September 2024 that there was “no serious risk of genocide occurring.”

    Since then, as Amnesty International reports, the situation in Gaza has deteriorated dramatically. On 2 March, Israel launched a new phase of its military campaign, imposing a total siege that has blocked humanitarian aid and fuelled mass starvation. Tens of thousands of civilians, including an unprecedented number of children, have been killed or injured. Entire neighbourhoods have been destroyed, and Gaza’s population faces famine and displacement on a devastating scale.

    Government response raises legal and ethical alarms

    The letter challenges the Government to explain why, despite this worsening crisis, it has not revised its previous conclusion. It calls for the immediate release of:

    • The findings of all genocide risk assessments conducted since March 2025
    • The criteria, methodology, and evidence used in making those assessments
    • The most recent assessment date and outcome
    • A clear statement on whether the UK now recognises a serious risk of genocide in Gaza

    “If these subsequent assessments have not led you to conclude that there is a serious risk of genocide in Gaza, triggering your obligation to prevent, we must ask how adequate your assessments are,” the letter states.

    Under the Genocide Convention, the UK has a binding duty to act to prevent where there is a serious risk of genocide. The signatories argue that the government should explain how it has not assessed that threshold as having been met.

    F-35 fighter jet exports: a dangerous legal position

    The letter also expresses alarm at the Government’s position in Al-Haq v Secretary of State, in which it defended the continued supply of F-35 fighter jet components to Israel. In its legal submission, the Government argued:

    “It is entirely unrealistic to suppose… any possibility of genocide would have been altered by any such curtailment on the use of F-35s.”

    Parliamentarians state in the letter:

    “It appears that the position of the UK government is that it is legitimate to provide weapons to states committing genocide if the assessment is that the impact of doing so would be minor. That is an abhorrent position to hold. If that is not the government’s position, then you must urgently correct the record.”  

    Transparency, accountability, and action needed

    The letter concludes by demanding full transparency from the Government, both to parliament and the public, regarding its assessments, decision-making, and continued arms exports to Israel.

    “Parliament must know the nature of the government’s assessments and recent assessments and their conclusions should be made public. It is imperative that it is explained to the House how your government has failed to recognise the serious risk of genocide based on current evidence.”

    The signatories are calling for an immediate response and the full publication of all relevant assessments.

     List of signatories [65 in total]

    • Brendan O’Hara MP 
    • Chris Law MP 
    • Stephen Gethins MP 
    • Stephen Flynn MP 
    • Dave Doogan MP 
    • Kirsty Blackman MP 
    • Pete Wishart MP 
    • Seamus Logan MP 
    • Graham Leadbitter MP 
    • The Baroness Mobarik CBE 
    • Kit Malthouse MP 
    • Kim Johnson MP 
    • Yasmin Qureshi MP 
    • Ian Byrne MP 
    • Andy McDonald MP 
    • Richard Burgon MP 
    • Imran Hussain MP 
    • Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill 
    • Nadia Whittome MP 
    • Steve Witherden MP 
    • Apsana Begum MP 
    • Jon Trickett MP 
    • Abtisam Mohammed MP 
    • Bell Ribeiro-Addy MP 
    • Neil Duncan Jordan MP 
    • Chris Hinchcliff MP 
    • Brian Leishman MP 
    • Rachael Maskell MP 
    • Clive Lewis MP 
    • Baroness Helena Kennedy LT KC 
    • Grahame Morris MP 
    • Ruth Cadbury MP 
    • Ben Lake MP 
    • Liz Saville Roberts MP 
    • Ann Davies MP 
    • Llinos Medi MP 
    • Alistair Carmichael MP 
    • Andrew George MP 
    • Angus Macdonald MP 
    • Colum Eastwood MP 
    • Claire Hanna MP 
    • Sorcha Eastwood MP 
    • Sian Berry MP 
    • Carla Denyer MP 
    • Ellie Chowns MP 
    • Adrian Ramsay MP 
    • Baroness Jenny Jones 
    • Baroness Natalie Bennett 
    • John Finucane MP 
    • Pat Cullen MP 
    • Órfhlaith Begley MP 
    • Dáire Hughes MP 
    • Chris Hazzard MP 
    • Cathal Mallaghan MP 
    • Paul Maskey MP 
    • Shockat Adam MP 
    • Adnan Hussain MP 
    • Ayoub Khan MP 
    • Zarah Sultana MP 
    • Iqbal Mohamed MP 
    • Rosie Duffield MP 
    • Jeremy Corbyn MP 
    • Lord Indarjit Singh
    • Baroness Gohir
    • The Rt Hon the Baroness Warsi 

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Yemen: US air strike that has left dozens of migrants dead must be investigated

    Source: Amnesty International –

    A US air strike on a migrant detention centre in Sa’ada, north-western Yemen on 28 April killed and injured dozens of migrants and must be investigated as a violation of international humanitarian law, said Amnesty International today, amid reports that hundreds of people have been killed and injured as a result of US air strikes on Yemen since March 2025.

    According to satellite imagery analysis, the US attacks carried out on Sa’ada prison compound struck the migrant detention centre and another building on the site.

    Amnesty International spoke with three individuals who work with African migrant and refugee communities in Yemen.  Two of them, who had visited the migrant detention centre as well as two nearby hospitals, and their morgues in the aftermath of the air strike, confirmed witnessing evidence of a high number of casualties.  The organization also analysed satellite imagery and video footage of horrific scenes showing migrants’ bodies strewn across rubble and rescuers trying to pull badly wounded survivors from the debris.  

    “The US attacked a well-known detention facility where the Huthis have been detaining migrants who had no means to take shelter. The major loss of civilian life in this attack raises serious concerns about whether the US complied with its obligations under international humanitarian law, including the rules on distinction and precautions,” said Agnès Callamard, Amnesty International’s Secretary General.

    “The US must conduct a prompt, independent and transparent investigation into this air strike and into any other air strikes that have resulted in civilian casualties as well as those where the rules of international humanitarian law may have been violated.”

    The major loss of civilian life in this attack raises serious concerns about whether the US complied with its obligations under international humanitarian law, including the rules on distinction and precautions,

    Agnès Callamard, Amnesty International’s Secretary General

    Witnesses who visited the Republican hospital and al Talh General hospital in Sa’ada, told Amnesty International they saw more than two dozen Ethiopian migrants who sustained injuries including severe amputations and fractures. They also said that the morgues at the hospitals ran out of space to receive dead bodies, so casualties received from the air strike had to be stacked outside. The ICRC, whose staff were at the site in the immediate aftermath of the attack, also confirmed in a statement a high number of casualties, many of whom were migrants.

    Under international humanitarian law attacking forces have an obligation to do everything feasible to distinguish between military and civilian targets, to verify whether their intended target is a military objective and to cancel an attack if there is doubt.  When attacking a military objective, parties to a conflict must also take all feasible precautions to minimise harm to civilians in the vicinity. 

    If civilian harm is found to have occurred, victims and their families should receive full reparation for violations of international humanitarian law. Furthermore, if investigations find that there were direct attacks on civilians and civilian objects or indiscriminate attacks striking military targets and civilians without distinction and which killed or injured civilians, they should be investigated and treated as violations of internation law and potential war crimes.

    Amnesty International’s arms experts analysed photos of the remnants of the weapons used in the attack and identified fragments of at least two 250 pound precision-guided GBU-39 Small Diameter Bombs. US Central Command did not announce the target of the attack but a US defense official said they were assessing “claims” of civilian casualties in the strike, and conducting “our battle-damage assessment”. This assessment, including any conclusions related to civilian harm and efforts to respond to it, should promptly be made public.

    Satellite imagery showing Sa’ada prison compound before the US air strike © 2025 Planet Labs PBC
    Satellite imagery showing the site after the US air strike © 2025 Planet Labs PBC

    The US should have known Sa’ada prison was a detention facility, that has been used for years by the Huthis to detain migrants and that it was regularly visited by ICRC. They should also have known that any aerial attack could result in significant civilian harm.

     Amnesty also recalls that another detention facility within the same Sa’ada prison compound was hit by a Saudi-led coalition air strike on 21 January 2022, using a US-made precision guided munition, killing more than 90 detainees and injuring dozens. According to satellite imagery, since that strike in 2022 the Huthi de facto authorities have constructed additional buildings at that location, one of which was also struck on 28 April.

    Amnesty International was unable to conclusively identify a legitimate military target within the Sa’ada prison compound. Restrictions by the Huthi de facto authorities on independent investigations, including access to the second location struck on 28 April, limit our ability to fully investigate the attack, or to rule out the possibility that there were military objectives within the prison compound. Any attack that fails to distinguish between civilians and civilian objects on the one hand, and legitimate military targets on the other, even within the same compound, constitutes an indiscriminate attack and a violation of international humanitarian law.

     ‘Shock and horror on their faces’

    Amnesty International analysed dozens of videos and photos published by Huthi al Masira TV channel in addition to seven videos privately shared by one witness. This digital evidence showing bodies scattered in the rubble points to dozens of civilian migrant deaths and injuries in the air strike on the detention centre.

    The Huthi-run Ministry of Interior stated that, at the time of the attack, the detention facility was holding 115 African migrant detainees, of whom 68 were killed and 47 were injured.  If this number of casualties proves accurate, it would be the worst case of civilian harm in a single incident by the US military since an air strike in Mosul, Iraq in 2017.

    Amnesty International could not independently verify the death toll, nor speak to survivors or medical workers, due to the Huthis’ ongoing crackdown on civic space. Huthi officials have issued several statements and directives prohibiting people from sharing names, photos, or any information related to the US air strikes’ casualties on social media and other public platforms. Multiple people said they were afraid to speak out of fear of reprisal. In recent years, aid workers, journalists and activists have been detained by the Huthis and accused of espionage.

    Despite this, Amnesty International was able to speak, on condition of anonymity, with three individuals working with African migrant and refugee communities who said that all the migrant detainees held at this detention centre were Ethiopian, with the exception of one Eritrean.  

    One witness said he saw 25 injured migrants in the Republican hospital and nine in Al Talh General hospital in Sa’ada: “They suffered from different fractures and bruises. Some were in critical condition and two had amputated legs… The morgue in the Republican hospital was overwhelmed and there was no place left for tens of corpses that were still left outside the morgue for the second day.”

    Another witness who visited both hospitals and spoke to dozens of the injured Ethiopian migrants said:

    “They told me they were sleeping when they were hit with the first missile at around 4 a.m. in the morning (…) They said they woke up to find dismembered bodies around them. You could see the shock and horror on their faces. Some were still unable to speak because of the trauma.”

    On 27 April, a day before the attack, US Central Command announced it had struck over 800 targets in Yemen since 15 March and that they were intentionally limiting disclosing information about their operations for reasons of operational security.

    US Congress should ensure ongoing efforts to mitigate civilian harm

    Critical systems put in place in recent years building on work started under the first Trump Administration to reduce and better respond to civilian harm caused by US lethal actions abroad are under threat by the current Trump Administration. News outlets have reported that programs at the Defense Department focused on civilian harm mitigation and response are being gutted, and that the US President has rolled back constraints on commanders authorizing certain types of air strikes and special operations.  It has also been reported that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth fired the top military lawyers responsible for ensuring compliance with international humanitarian law in military operations.

    “At a time when the US appears to be shrinking efforts aimed at reducing civilian harm by US lethal actions, the US Congress should play its oversight role and demand information on investigations to date on these strikes. Congress must further ensure that civilian harm mitigation and response mechanisms remain intact and robustly respond to this and other recent incidents,” said Agnès Callamard.

    Background

     Between November 2023 and January 2025, Huthi armed forces have targeted at least 74 commercial and military vessels in the Red Sea, the Gulf of Aden and the Indian Ocean, which they claimed were linked to Israel, the USA or the UK.

    US President Joe Biden began air strikes against the Huthis in 2024. The new wave of US strikes under the Trump Administration started on 15 March 2025 after the Huthis announced on 11 March that they would resume attacks on Israeli ships passing through the Red and Arabian seas in response to Israel blocking aid into the occupied Gaza Strip.

    Since 15 March, the Huthis have launched missiles and drones at the USS Harry S. Truman, an aircraft carrier stationed in the Red Sea. They have also resumed their attacks on Israel, striking near Tel Aviv’s Ben Gurion Airport on 4 May. Israel retaliated in May with air strikes including on Hodeidah port and Sana’a airport.

    On 6 May, the US announced it was ending its military campaign against the Huthis in Yemen.

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Leo XIV and the greatest challenge of our time

    Source: Greenpeace Statement –

    Following his piece on the late Pope Francis, Jefferson Chua continues his reflections on the relationship between the Papacy of the Roman Catholic Church and climate change, now in the hands of a new pontiff.

    © ANDINA/Archive

    There is a photo of Robert Francis Prevost, back then when he was still archbishop in Chiclayo, Peru, wading through the floodwater that devastated his parish during the historic 2017 El Niño floods. He struck a calm figure who had little to no qualms about being in the middle of  a disaster. The photo made me think: what does Prevost, now Pope Leo XIV, think of climate change, and–more importantly– the solutions needed to address it?

    There are quite a number of clues as to what he would have thought about climate change. He largely aligns with the late Pope Francis’s pivot towards the environment and the Laudato Si agenda, in urging the church to transform words into action in addressing the climate crisis. He has likewise called for a “non-tyrannical relationship” with nature as a key ingredient in climate action, while warning of serious consequences brought about by technological innovation if it is not grounded in a reciprocal relationship with nature.

    In the same breath he also mentions the Vatican’s recent adoption of solar power as well as the purchase of electric vehicles as positive steps in addressing climate change. In his younger years he has also pushed for petitions and shared opinions that seem to align with more urgent climate action and international cooperation.

    I am drawn to the pope’s choice of name. His nominal predecessor, Leo XIII, stands among the giants of the petrine ministry because he took on arguably the greatest challenge of the church during his time: its relationship with the modern world. His encyclical, Rerum Novarum, not only articulated the church’s positionality in the modernizing and industrializing world, but also spoke about the dangers of unchecked capitalism and its impacts on rights, especially that of workers and laborers. In other words, Leo XIII signalled a critical gaze on unchecked profiteering and how this pursuit of more growth and wealth comes at the expense of the rights of those that were instrumental in achieving that wealth.

    I wonder if Leo XIV will be able to transpose this critical gaze onto arguably the greatest challenge of our time, the climate crisis. Our era is characterized by the near-total domination of the corporate few who have reaped in record profits at the expense of everyone. Climate impacts have been increasing in intensity and regularity more than ever, resulting in staggering global losses. In 2024 alone, estimates vary from insurance payouts worth USD 137 billion, to upwards of USD 229 billion with just the ten costliest disasters of last year.

    In contrast, just the five largest investor-owned oil and gas companies–Shell, Exxon Mobil, British Petroleum, Chevron, and Total Energies–earned USD 102 billion in 2024. The figure becomes even more mind-boggling if one looks at their profits in the last decade, which amounted to almost USD 800 billion. This greed is underlined by their business practices, with all of them announcing in different manners of speaking that they will not be phasing out oil and gas and will be cutting investments in green and renewable energy, while at the same time spending astronomical amounts of money to run advertising and marketing campaigns that paint a rosy picture of their supposed concern for the environment and climate action.

    Taking a broader view lays bare this gross inequality: the world’s wealthiest 10% has caused two-thirds of global warming since 1990, which boils down to not just individual lifestyle choices, but more importantly to the concentration of wealth held by a very few but powerful group of people. 

    It is amid this sad and alarming backdrop that we find Leo XIV, who inherits a church in a world that is increasingly more difficult to live in, especially by those at the frontlines of the climate crisis. It is this world that also beckons on Leo XIV to transform the church “from words to action.” Climate action must go beyond platitudes and pursue accountability. 

    There are hopeful signals within the church. A good example would be the Philippines, which constantly ranks as among the most vulnerable countries to climate impacts. For instance, the Roman Catholic Church in the country has set 2025 as the target year when it will be fully divesting from coal and fossil gas investments. Religious-run academic institutions such as Mapua University has likewise pronounced that it too will be divesting from fossil fuels. Church-based grassroots communities and priests have likewise supported environmental defenders and indigenous groups against unchecked transition mineral mining, and have called for holistic climate accountability policies such as the CLIMA Bill. That there is a wealth of examples in the frontiers of the climate crisis should push Leo XIV to take on the fight for climate justice beyond discursive urging. He inherits a church that is suffering precisely because it is in the frontlines. In this manner, Leo XIV himself, through the office entrusted to him, also inherits this moral responsibility to act.

    Perhaps none can encapsulate this moral imperative of his papacy better than an example from his adopted home, Peru. Saul Luciano Lliuya, a farmer from Huaraz, Peru, filed a case against German energy company RWE AG. Initially filed in 2015, Lliuya contested that RWE’s emissions–which is considered one of the biggest emitters in Europe–had a direct impact on the climate that is threatening the claimant’s home. After a successful appeal process in 2017 and initial hearings in March 2025, the court will issue an announcement this May. Lliuya’s case takes on and represents an increasingly-familiar experience by climate-impacted frontline communities of no accountability and increasing impacts.
    One can imagine Leo XIV, in his white cassock, bearing witness to the increasing frequency of floods that Lliuya and countless others are experiencing and, perhaps, likewise add his influential voice to the growing chorus of those calling for accountability. If he is true to his name, and if his papacy signals an unbroken line from Francis’s concerns in Laudato Si, then there is no other alternative to calling out those who are most responsible for the climate crisis: not just individuals, not just countries, but corporations that have accumulated so much wealth while the least of us suffer the worst consequences of a common home in crisis.

    Jefferson Chua is a Greenpeace Campaigner working on climate, based in the Philippines.


    You might want to check out Greenpeace Philippines’ petition called Courage for Climate, a drive in support of real policy and legal solutions in the pursuit of climate justice.

    Courage for Climate

    The climate crisis may seem hopeless, but now is the time for courage, not despair. Join Filipino communities taking bold action for our planet.

    Make an Act of Courage Today!

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Syria: New government must prioritise justice, truth and accountability to prevent further abuse – Amnesty warns

    Source: Amnesty International –

    Syria’s new government faces a crucial opportunity to break with a legacy of grave human rights violations

    Justice for victims of mass enforced disappearances remains one of the most urgent human rights challenges in Syria today

    After the fall of the Assad government, tens of thousands of families hoped their missing loved ones would return. Instead, almost none reappeared – their fate still unknown, their absence a deepening tragedy

    ‘Delaying justice will only heighten the risk of further bloodshed such as the recent mass killing of Alawite civilians in the coastal areas of Syria’ – Kristine Beckerle

    Syria’s new government must take immediate concrete steps towards justice, truth and reparation that address the country’s devastating legacy of abuses and urgently undertake human rights-based reform to prevent further violations, Amnesty International said today.

    Between 2011 and 2024, Amnesty documented widespread crimes under international law, including war crimes and crimes against humanity and gross human rights violations, committed by Bashar al-Assad’s government. Amnesty also documented serious crimes committed by government allies, including Russia, as well as by armed groups opposing the government and their ally Turkiye, and the Kurdish-led de facto authorities and their allies.

    The new transitional government, led by President Ahmad al-Sharaa and formed on 29 March, has a crucial opportunity to break with the past and ensure these atrocities never occur again.

    Amnesty has today outlined the priority steps that the authorities should take to achieve this and to comply with Syria’s obligations under international law.

    On 14 April, Amnesty sent the recommendations to the Syrian authorities, requesting answers to a series of questions and updates on the authorities’ plans, but have not received a response to date.

    Kristine Beckerle, Amnesty International’s Deputy Director for the Middle East and North Africa, said:

    “To ensure a break with the past, the Syrian government must uphold the rights to truth, justice and reparation for all people in Syria.

    “The authorities have publicly committed to taking justice demands seriously, and key to keeping this promise will be ensuring the meaningful participation of survivors, victims and Syrian civil society organisations throughout the process, as well as maximum transparency.

    “The challenges facing Syria are immense, but ensuring accountability for crimes committed by all warring parties, providing reparation to victims and their families, implementing human rights-based reforms to Syria’s criminal justice and security sectors, and ensuring the families of the disappeared know the truth of what happened to their loved ones are foundational to building a new, more just Syria.

    “It is crucial for the authorities to rebuild trust between the people in Syria and the state. Delaying justice will only heighten the risk of further bloodshed such as the recent mass killing of Alawite civilians in the coastal areas of Syria.

    “It is essential that the authorities, without any delay, ensure that all those suspected of criminal responsibility for crimes against humanity, war crimes, torture and enforced disappearance are brought to justice in fair trials before ordinary civilian courts, in accordance with international law.”

    For decades, the former government systematically arrested and disappeared activists and human rights defenders, oppressed local human rights organisations and denied international human rights organisations access to the country. The new authorities have pledged a new approach; it is crucial that they allow Syrian and international organisations to work without interference, consult with Syrian civil society, and grant unfettered access for local and international organisations.

    The authorities are grappling with major economic challenges resulting from a decade-long conflict, compounded by international sanctions and the widespread destruction of infrastructure.

    The international community must support the Syrian people in their pursuit of truth, justice and reparation, and building a more just future after years of suffering.

    While many countries continue to support critical justice efforts for Syria, others have added to its challenges. The United States haphazardly cut foreign funding to those providing crucial humanitarian aid and doing critical human rights work in Syria in early 2025. Since former government’s fall, Turkiye and Israel have also carried out air strikes, killing and wounding civilians and damaging civilian infrastructure.

    Provide justice, truth and reparation

    One of the most urgent issues in Syria today is justice for victims of mass enforced disappearances. After the fall of the Assad government on 8 December 2024, tens of thousands of families hoped their missing loved ones would be released. Instead, nearly none re-emerged; many seemingly vanished.

    While the government announced a National High Commission for Missing Persons on 27 February, representatives of family associations of the disappeared and missing told Amnesty they had not been consulted on the formation of the body and how it would function and have seen no tangible progress five months after the Assad government’s collapse. The new government must immediately rectify this by ensuring full, meaningful inclusion of victims and their representatives in shaping the Commission’s mandate, operational framework, and oversight mechanisms.

    Article 49 of the Constitutional Declaration, adopted on 13 March, establishes a Transitional Justice Commission, tasked with adopting “victim-centred mechanisms…to determine accountability mechanisms, the right to know the truth, and justice for victims and survivors in addition to honouring martyrs”.  Effective truth, justice and reparation processes must be based on nationwide consultations with Syrians, particularly survivors and victims.

    The government must also create reparation programmes informed by survivors and victims’ families that deliver comprehensive remedies that acknowledge victims’ suffering and help rebuild lives. The Syrian government should also seek reparations from states such as Russia, Türkiye and the US, and other actors, including businesses, that are responsible for human rights violations.

    Undertaking human rights-based reforms

    For over a decade prior to the former government’s fall, Amnesty documented systemic violations, including arbitrary arrest, torture, and enforced disappearances, committed by former law enforcement officers and intelligence services, and within the prison system. In addition, Amnesty has documented abduction, torture and summary killings by former non-state armed groups, some now integrated into the ministry of defence and ministry of interior.

    As an immediate priority, and to prevent a repeat of violations and cycles of violence, Syrian authorities must ensure rigorous vetting of all government officials, military leaders, and other appointed figures suspected of criminal responsibility, including post-Assad crimes – such as the massacres of Alawite civilians on the coast. Amnesty documented unlawful killings, including deliberate targeting of civilians from the Alawite minority, which must be investigated as war crimes, on Syria’s coast in March. Syria’s new authorities have taken an important first step toward investigating the killings by establishing a dedicated fact-finding committee. How they proceed will serve as an important signal and a key precedent.

    Reform should also involve repealing laws that are not compliant with international law and enacting legislation that safeguards the human rights of all people, including their rights to a fair trial, truth, justice and reparation; freedom from torture and disappearance, equality and non-discrimination, including in the context of the rights to housing and property. Any reform committee should be accessible, inclusive, and participatory.

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: “I never had a day off and barely left the house in two years”

    Source: Amnesty International –

    Katherine* is one of thousands of Kenyan women who migrate to Saudi Arabia each year for jobs as domestic workers in private households. She was recruited through an agent who sold her a dream of economic fortunes, which fast turned into a nightmare of human rights abuse.

    The abuses faced by migrant domestic workers are enabled by their exclusion from Saudi Arabia’s labour laws, poor enforcement of existing regulations, structural racism embedded in the country’s kafala sponsorship system and the legacies of slavery and colonialism that continue to manifest in human rights abuses today. Migrant domestic workers remain among the least protected, despite being essential to the functioning of households and the broader economies in both countries.

    Here, Katherine, reveals what life was like as a domestic worker in Saudi Arabia for two years, and what she thinks the Kenyan and Saudi authorities can do to end the exploitation of domestic workers and the structural discrimination they face as Black African women.

    A few years ago, my mother became ill and had to have heart surgery. She was the main breadwinner of the family. Being the first born, I had to step in.

    After three months, my mother was discharged from hospital, but by that time we had three months’ rent and school fees arrears because I was jobless.

    Around this time, I met a man in a local shop who told me that he heard that my mother was sick and that he had a job opportunity. I was shocked when he told me it was in Saudi Arabia, because of all the stories I’d heard.  But he said I will not have to pay any fees; everything would be taken care of. So, I accepted.

    After that, I was given a contract to sign. I remember it said the working hours would be eight daily with a weekly day off, the salary would be SAR 800 (around USD 215) monthly with paid overtime, and it would be increased after a few months. They were rushing us to sign, and I didn’t have time to do research.

    Soon after, the agent called to tell me I would be leaving on a flight the following day.

    At the airport, together with at least 30 other women, we were given our travel documents. Some were going to Dubai, others, like me, flew to Riyadh.

    On landing, I was greeted by another agent, who took my passport and handed it to my employer a few days after our arrival. At this point I did not know that I should not give my passport to anyone. To my relief, my employer handed it back to me after checking it. This is when I thought I was going to a good place. Indeed, my room was good with air conditioning and a lock. I was going to work for my 60-year-old employer, his wife and their six children. In the beginning, things were okay, and the workload was manageable.

    Soon the madam (employer’s wife) started complaining and shouting that I was not cleaning properly. She said I wasn’t clean, and I didn’t know how to clean. I was shocked at how she spoke to me.

    I never had a day off and barely left the house in two years.

    Katherine

    Each day I would start work at 6am and regularly work until around midnight, with just a few hours to rest and eat early in the evening. On Fridays, there used to be a party, so I would work even later, preparing, cleaning and then washing up after the guests had left. Even when I had to stay up into the early hours, my morning began at the same time, so I was sleeping just two hours on those days.

    I never had a day off and barely left the house in two years.

    Honestly speaking, this left me traumatized. Once, I asked my employers if I would ever be allowed outside to get some fresh air. That summer, they did take me out. But even this time I was not allowed to relax – I had to look after the grandchildren. These kids were very rude to me. They used to shout at me and tell me “you are a shaghala (maid/servant), you are supposed to do everything I tell you!”

    The madam would also often shout and scream at me in Arabic, calling me names, and sometimes she would physically abuse me. Once, she asked me to take one of the baby grandchildren to the bathroom to be washed, but this was not part of my job. When I said no, because I was worried if something happened to the baby they would say I hurt her, my employer slapped me. She said: “I bought you. You belong to me, and you do what I say!” I wanted to reply, but I remembered, this is Saudi Arabia, not your country. So, I sat in the corner and cried.

    The madam would also often shout and scream at me in Arabic, calling me names, and sometimes she would physically abuse me.

    They were spiteful too. They would make me wash the family’s clothes by hand using bleach, even though there was a washing machine, which gave me chest problems and discoloured my hands. Sometimes they would cut off my internet. Once, the madam took my mobile and broke it into pieces after I asked the husband for a smartphone so I could talk to my family. I was the only helper, but the grown-up children would refuse to help me carry heavy cartons of water up multiple flights of stairs when 100 boxes were delivered to the house at a time.

    They would resist taking me to get medical treatment too. I have a heart condition and one time it got worse. On that occasion they took me to the hospital where I was given medicine and asked to go back after two weeks. But when the two weeks came my madam said that going back is a waste of money as I have recovered.

    The madam would also often shout and scream at me in Arabic, calling me names, and sometimes she would physically abuse me.

    Katherine

    Food was the main issue, though. They would deprive me of food or only give me leftovers or gone-off food. The madam scolded me for taking bread from the cupboard when I was hungry. The rotten food caused me stomach problems, but they would only give me painkillers or Cardamom tea, and they would tell me off for being in the bathroom too long. When I made my own food, my madam complained that it smelled bad. Instead, I cooked dried noodles. but when she found out she threw it in the bin, saying that her children were the only ones allowed to eat noodles. So, I used to survive without eating or just drank black tea and ate biscuits.

    They would deprive me of food or only give me leftovers or gone-off food.

    Thankfully, I was paid on time, but because I was not allowed outside, they would just give me SAR 100 each month and send the rest directly to my family in Kenya. They didn’t increase my salary, like my contract had said. It was only after two years when I was about to go home that they offered to. By then I wanted to leave.

    Since returning to Kenya, I have started working with some local organizations to raise awareness about the risks people face when travelling to the Gulf for work. Us Kenyans have this habit of standing with each other like bees – when you attack one of us, others will come to help. Having heard the stories of many other women, I actually thank God, because I think my experience was better than some.

    Since returning to Kenya, I have started working with some local organizations to raise awareness about the risks people face when travelling to the Gulf for work.

    The problem in Kenya is that the government is not strict on the recruitment agents, who send us abroad and then abandon us – no one checks how we are doing.

    Our work as migrant domestic workers is vital in Saudi Arabia. If we did not do the work, everything would come to a standstill in the country, so the governments should make sure we are safe. The rights of human beings should apply to everyone, whatever their skin colour or nationality – policies in Saudi Arabia should protect the nationals but they should also protect us migrant workers. We domestic workers should be included under the Labour law so that we have the same rights as other workers. We call on the government to punish employers that mistreat foreigners and take real action to stop racism against migrant domestic workers.

    Read Amnesty International’s report Locked in, left out: the hidden lives of Kenyan domestic workers in Saudi Arabia.

    *Name has been changed

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Europe: Brussels court ruling on tracking-based ads a major win for right to privacy 

    Source: Amnesty International –

    Responding to the Brussels Court of Appeal ruling establishing that the consent model underpinning tracking-based advertising by Big Tech companies such as Google, Microsoft, Amazon and X in Europe is incompatible with EU privacy data law, Hannah Storey, Amnesty International Policy Advisor on Technology and Human Rights said: 

    “This a major win for the right to privacy and a clear message that the tech industry should move away from surveillance-based advertising to a more rights-respecting model. 

    “The practice of harvesting and processing our data using the Transparency and Consent Framework (TCF), currently used for most online advertising, is not compatible with the right the right to privacy. This ruling is a significant turning point in the push against the rights-violating business model.   

    Hannah Storey, Amnesty International Policy Advisor on Technology and Human Rights

    “Advertising online is underpinned by ‘real time bidding’. This system collects personal information about us, such as what we’re reading, listening to, where we are, and can infer personal things about us like beliefs, sexual preferences and health conditions. 

    “Every time you load a website this personal information is shared with thousands of companies who then bid to show you an advert without proper control over your information and that’s a massive privacy breach. 

    “Big Tech companies have tried to argue that they are complying with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), an EU digital privacy law enacted in 2016 to enhance data protection and privacy for individuals, by using the Transparency and Consent Framework – asking for our consent for this privacy invasion through mere popups – but this ruling shows that this model is not sufficient.” 

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Syria: New government must prioritize justice and truth measures to prevent further abuse

    Source: Amnesty International –

    Syria’s new government must take immediate, concrete steps towards justice, truth and reparation that address the country’s devastating legacy of abuses and urgently undertake human rights-based reform to prevent further violations, said Amnesty International today.

    Between 2011 and 2024, Amnesty International documented widespread crimes under international law, including war crimes and crimes against humanity and gross human rights violations, committed by President Bashar al-Assad’s government. The organization also documented serious crimes committed by government allies, including Russia, as well as by armed groups opposing the government and their ally Turkiye, and the Kurdish-led de facto authorities and their allies.

    The new transitional government, led by President Ahmad al-Sharaa and formed on 29 March 2025, has a crucial opportunity to break with the past and ensure non-repetition of these atrocities. Amnesty International has today outlined the priority  steps that the authorities should take to achieve this and to comply with Syria’s obligations under international law. On 14 April 2025, Amnesty International sent the recommendations to the Syrian authorities, requesting answers to a series of questions and updates on the authorities’ plans, but did not receive a response so far.

    “To ensure a break with the past, the Syrian government must uphold the rights to truth, justice and reparation for all people in Syria. The authorities have publicly committed to taking justice demands seriously, and key to keeping this promise will be ensuring the meaningful participation of survivors, victims and Syrian civil society organizations throughout the process, as well as maximum transparency,” said Kristine Beckerle, Amnesty International’s Deputy Director for the Middle East and North Africa.

    To ensure a break with the past, the Syrian government must uphold the rights to truth, justice and reparation for all people in Syria

    Kristine Beckerle, Deputy Director for the Middle East and North Africa

    “The challenges facing Syria are immense, but ensuring accountability for crimes committed by all warring parties, providing reparation to victims and their families, many of whom are still suffering the pain of disappeared and missing relatives, implementing human rights-based reforms to Syria’s criminal justice and security sectors, and ensuring the families of the disappeared know the truth of what happened to their loved ones are foundational to building a new, more just Syria,”

    “It is crucial for the authorities to rebuild trust between the people in Syria and the state.  Delaying justice will only heighten the risk of further bloodshed such as the recent mass killing of Alawite civilians in the coastal areas of Syria. X It is essential that the authorities, without any delay, ensure that all those suspected of criminal responsibility for crimes against humanity, war crimes, torture and enforced disappearance are brought to justice in fair trials before ordinary civilian courts, in accordance with international law.”

    For decades, the former government systematically arrested and disappeared activists and human rights defenders, oppressed local human rights organizations and denied international human rights organizations access to the country. The new authorities have pledged a new approach; it is crucial that they allow Syrian and international organizations to work without interference, consult with Syrian civil society, and grant unfettered access for local and international organizations.

    The authorities are grappling with major economic challenges resulting from a decade-long conflict, compounded by international sanctions and the widespread destruction of infrastructure. The international community must support the Syrian people in their pursuit of truth, justice and reparation, and building a more just future after years of suffering.

    While many countries continue to support critical justice efforts for Syria, others have added to its challenges. The United States haphazardly cut foreign funding to those providing crucial humanitarian aid and doing critical human rights work in Syria in early 2025. Since former government’s fall, Turkiye and Israel have also carried out air strikes, killing and wounding civilians and damaging civilian infrastructure.

    Provide justice, truth and reparation

    One of the most urgent issues in Syria today is justice for victims of mass enforced disappearances. After the fall of the Assad government on 8 December 2024, tens of thousands of families hoped their missing loved ones would be released. Instead, nearly none re-emerged; many seemingly vanished.

    While the government announced a National High Commission for Missing Persons on 27 February 2025, representatives of family associations of the disappeared and missing told Amnesty International they had not been consulted on the formation of the body and how it would function and have seen no tangible progress five months after the Assad government’s collapse. The new government must immediately rectify this by ensuring full, meaningful inclusion of victims and their representatives in shaping the Commission’s mandate, operational framework, and oversight mechanisms.

    Article 49 of the Constitutional Declaration, adopted on 13 March 2025, establishes a Transitional Justice Commission, tasked with adopting “victim-centred mechanisms…to determine accountability mechanisms, the right to know the truth, and justice for victims and survivors in addition to honouring martyrs”.  Effective truth, justice and reparation processes must be based on nationwide consultations with Syrians, particularly survivors and victims.

    The government must also create reparation programmes informed by survivors and victims’ families that deliver comprehensive remedies that acknowledge victims’ suffering and help rebuild lives. The Syrian government should also seek reparations from states such as Russia, Türkiye and the US, and other actors, including businesses, that are responsible for human rights violations.

    Undertaking human rights-based reforms

    For over a decade prior to the former government’s fall, Amnesty International documented systemic violations, including arbitrary arrest, torture, and enforced disappearances, committed by former law enforcement officers and intelligence services, and within the prison system. In addition, the organization has documented abduction, torture and summary killings by former non-state armed groups, some now integrated into the ministry of defence and ministry of interior.

    As an immediate priority, and to prevent a repeat of violations and cycles of violence, Syrian authorities must ensure rigorous vetting of all government officials, military leaders, and other appointed figures suspected of criminal responsibility, including post-Assad crimes – such as the massacres of Alawite civilians on the coast. Amnesty International documented unlawful killings, including deliberate targeting of civilians from the Alawite minority, which must be investigated as war crimes, on Syria’s coast in March 2025. Syria’s new authorities have taken an important first step toward investigating the killings by establishing a dedicated fact-finding committee. How they proceed will serve as an important signal and a key precedent.

    Reform should also involve repealing laws that are not compliant with international law and enacting legislation that safeguards the human rights of all people, including their rights to a fair trial, truth, justice and reparation; freedom from torture and disappearance, equality and non-discrimination, including in the context of the rights to housing and property. Any reform committee should be accessible, inclusive, and participatory

    MIL OSI NGO