Category: NGOs

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Deep sea mining ‘piracy in policy’: Greenpeace condemns Trump, The Metals Company for mining support

    Source: Greenpeace Statement –

    Washington/Sydney, Saturday 26 April 2025 — Greenpeace Australia Pacific has slammed Donald Trump’s support of deep sea mining as a ‘gross betrayal of the Pacific’ after the Trump administration signed an executive order advancing U.S. ambitions to launch deep sea mining in U.S. and international waters.

    This rogue action is highly politically controversial for appearing to bypass the International Seabed Authority (ISA), the regulatory body set up by the United Nations to protect the deep sea as the common heritage of humankind and decide whether deep sea mining can start in the international seabed. 

    The Metals Company (TMC) – a deep sea mining company – recently declared its intention to work with the Trump Administration outside of the UN-established regulatory framework, to try to start mining in the Clarion Clipperton Zone (CCZ) in the Pacific – a region that sits outside jurisdiction. The Executive Order instructs the Secretary of Commerce to expedite the process for reviewing and issuing exploration and commercial recovery permits under the Deep Seabed Hard Mineral Resources Act (DSHMRA), breaking the longstanding tradition of the US being a good-faith actor on UNCLOS (The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea). 

    The order outlines that the Trump administration seeks to identify minerals for defence, infrastructure and energy purposes, and makes no mention of addressing the climate crisis.

    Shiva Gounden, Head of Pacific at Greenpeace Australia Pacific, said: “By authorising deep sea mining outside of international law, the Trump Administration is dressing up a disaster in a suit and tie, signing policies in boardrooms that will drown Pacific nations in financial, economic, cultural and environmental disaster. It’s neocolonialism with a letterhead.

    “The Metals Company steam-rolled its way over multilateralism at the ISA and straight through the doors of Donald Trump, without a look back at the Pacific nations it is betraying. Pushing ahead with deep sea mining is a slap in the face to multilateralism, an insult to the UN’s regulatory body, and a gross betrayal of the Pacific.”

    If approved, the plans could allow TMC to start mining in the CCZ – a region known for an abundance of polymetallic nodules – and threaten to derail years of negotiations between TMC and its sponsoring states including Nauru, Tonga and Kiribati.

    “This move risks leaving Nauru, Kiribati and Tonga high and dry; TMC promised the people of Nauru jobs and prosperity from this agreement, saying that mining their waters would help fix the climate crisis. But it has taken the first chance it got to turn its back on Nauru and it will do the same to any other Pacific country. TMC is a money-hungry machine, using and abusing its Pacific partners without a care for the people, their cultural connection to the ocean, jobs, prosperity or the climate crisis,” Gounden said. 

    “Deep sea mining is piracy in policy – allowing governments to raid resources and leave wreckage behind. The Trump administration is looking for minerals to build weapons for America – not help the Pacific. This should be a warning to all Pacific leaders: the deep sea mining industry is not our friend, it is an industry of lies and betrayal. Pacific leaders must now unite to protect our Pacific Ocean and call for a moratorium on deep sea mining.”

    According to The Metals Company, it will apply for permits “in the second quarter of 2025”, with reports stating intent to commence mining operations as soon as 2027. Gerard Barron, the Australian CEO of The Metals Company, has gone on the record with his company’s willingness and desire to bypass internationally agreed regulations, stating in reference to the ongoing negotiations at the ISA “by all means, go ahead and sign your treaty…we’ll be out there”.

    Currently, 32 countries have backed a moratorium or precautionary pause on deep sea mining, including Tuvalu, Palau, Solomon Islands, Marshall Islands, Fiji, the Federated States of Micronesia, Vanuatu and Samoa. Australia has not.

    —ENDS—

    For more information or to arrange an interview, please contact Kimberley Bernard on +61 407 581 404 or [email protected]

    Photos available in the Greenpeace Media Library

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: No relief and no chance of recovery for Gaza burn patients

    Source: Médecins Sans Frontières –

    A burn injury is more than just a wound – it is a prolonged sentence of suffering, and this is even more so in Gaza, Palestine. Many people have extensive burns covering large portions of their bodies – some people have as much as 40 per cent of their total body surface burned.

    After over 19 months of attacks by Israeli forces that have decimated Gaza’s healthcare system, patients suffering burns from bomb explosions and improvised cooking methods are left with few options for care. As Israeli authorities maintain the siege on Gaza, blocking access to basic aid, medical and life-saving supplies, many patients are left to endure excruciating pain with limited or no relief.

    In August 2024, 17-year-old Tayseer Mansour was badly burned all over his body in an Israeli strike that hit his house, killing his mother and injuring himself, his father and brothers. He is being treated by Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) teams at Nasser hospital in Khan Younis, southern Gaza.

    “I was severely injured with third degree burns. I’ve been in the inpatient department for more than 150 days now. I can’t move my hands anymore, it’s very painful,” says Mansour. “I can’t eat on my own or do much of anything else. This has had a big impact on me. I hope I will recover.”

    Since Israeli forces resumed hostilities on 18 March, MSF teams have seen an increase in the number of patients with burn injuries – most of them children. In April, in our clinic in Gaza City in the north of Gaza, MSF teams are seeing an average of over 100 patients with burns and injuries a day. At Nasser hospital, the largest functioning hospital left in Gaza, MSF teams provide care for burn patients.

    Since May 2024, MSF teams working in Nasser hospital have provided over 1,000 surgical operations to burn patients, 70 per cent of which have been children, most under the age of five. Many of these children were burned by bomb blasts and others by boiling water or fuel used for cooking or heating in makeshift shelters.

    Severe burns require complex and long-term care, including multiple surgeries, daily wound dressing changes, physiotherapy, pain management, psychological support, and a sterile environment to prevent infection. However, after 50 days of no supplies entering Gaza due to the blockade, MSF teams are running low on even basic painkillers, leaving patients without adequate pain relief. At the same time, since the beginning of the war, only very few surgeons in Gaza have the ability to manage complex burn care plastic surgery.

    “Children scream as we are forced to peel burnt fabric from their skin,” says Dr Ahmad Abu Warda, MSF medical activity manager working at Nasser hospital. “They beg us to stop but if we don’t remove the dead tissue, infection and sepsis can lead to death. Without enough medical supplies, and with too many patients needing care for burn injuries, we are not able to provide proper care. We are merely delaying inevitable infections.”

    While burn patients require a high level of healthcare, they also need over double the number of daily calories to heal properly. With no food entering Gaza, patients are surviving on insufficient amounts of food, jeopardising their recovery.

    “The conditions in Gaza are extremely difficult. There is no healthy food, meat or proper nutrition,” says Mansour.

    “Our patients’ bodies are consuming themselves to close wounds that never heal,” says one MSF surgeon. “Tayseer has been in the hospital for eight months. In normal conditions, he would have healed in three. But with no food, no pain relief, no clean water he’s stuck in a cycle of graft failures, infection, and despair.”

    Since December 2024, MSF teams working in our Gaza City clinic and field hospital in Deir al-Balah, as well as Nasser hospital, have provided over 6,518 burn dressings. Yet, nearly half of these patients have not returned for follow-up care. As of 24 April, over half of the functioning health facilities in Gaza are located in areas under evacuation orders, according to OCHA, making healthcare almost inaccessible.

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: After first 100 days of US aid budget cuts

    Source: Médecins Sans Frontières –

    New York — Three months since the Trump administration first suspended all international assistance pending review, the United States (US) has terminated much of its funding for global health and humanitarian programmes, dismantled the federal government architecture for oversight of these activities, and fired many of the key staff responsible for implementation. Patients around the world are scrambling to understand how they can continue treatment, medical providers are struggling to maintain essential services, and aid groups are sounding the alarm about exploding needs in countries with existing emergencies.

    “These sudden cuts by the Trump administration are a human-made disaster for the millions of people struggling to survive amid wars, disease outbreaks, and other emergencies,” says Avril Benoît, CEO of Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) in the US. “We are an emergency response organisation, but we have never seen anything like this massive disruption to global health and humanitarian programmes. The risks are catastrophic, especially since people who rely on foreign assistance are already among the most vulnerable in the world.”

    The US has long been the leading supporter of global health and humanitarian programmes, responsible for around 40% of all related funding. These US investments have helped improve the health and well-being of communities around the globe — and totalled less than 1% of the annual federal budget.

    Abruptly ending this huge proportion of support is already having devastating consequences for people who rely on aid, including those at risk of malnutrition and infectious diseases, and those who are trapped in humanitarian crises around the world. These major cuts to US funding and staffing are part of a broader policy agenda that has far-reaching impacts for people whose access to care is already limited by persecution and discrimination, such as refugees and migrants, civilians caught in conflict, LGBTQI+ people, and anyone who can become pregnant.

    The status of even the much-reduced number of remaining US-funded programmes is highly uncertain. The administration now plans to extend the initial 90-day review period for foreign aid, which was due to conclude on 20 April, by an additional 30 days, according to an internal email from the State Department obtained by the media.

    MSF does not accept US government funding, so we are not directly affected by these sweeping changes to international assistance as most other aid organisations are. We remain committed to providing medical care and humanitarian support in more than 70 countries across the world. However, no organisation can do this work alone. We work closely with other health and humanitarian organisations to deliver vital services, and many of our activities involve programmes that have been disrupted due to funding cuts.

    It will be much more difficult and costly to provide care when so many ministries of health have been affected globally and there are fewer community partners overall. We will also be facing fewer places to refer patients for specialised services, as well as shortages and stockouts due to hamstrung supply chains.

    Amid ongoing chaos and confusion, our teams are already witnessing some of the life-threatening consequences of the administration’s actions to date. Most recently, the US administration cancelled nearly all humanitarian assistance programmes in Yemen and Afghanistan, two countries facing some of the most severe humanitarian needs in the world. After years of conflict and compounding crises, an estimated 19.5 million people in Yemen — over half the population — are dependent on aid. The decision to punish civilians caught in these two conflicts undermines the principles of humanitarian assistance.

    Across the world, MSF teams have witnessed US-funded organisations reducing or cancelling other vital activities –including vaccination campaigns, protection and care for people caught in areas of conflict, sexual and reproductive health services, the provision of clean water, and adequate sanitation services.

    “It’s shocking to see the US abandon its leadership role in advancing global health and humanitarian efforts,” says Benoît. “US assistance has been a lifeline for millions of people–while yanking this support will lead to more preventable deaths and untold suffering around the world. We can’t accept this dangerous new normal. We urge the administration and Congress to maintain commitments to support critical global health and humanitarian aid.”

    Snapshot: How US aid cuts are impacting people worldwide

    Malnutrition: US funding cuts are severely impacting people in areas of Somalia affected by chronic drought, food insecurity, and displacement due to conflict. In the Baidoa and Mudug regions, the scaling down of operations by aid organisations — driven by US funding cuts and a broader lack of humanitarian aid — is making a shortage of health services and nutrition programmes even more critical. For example, the closure of maternal and child health clinics and a therapeutic feeding centre in Baidoa cut off monthly care to hundreds of malnourished children. MSF nutrition programmes in Baidoa have reported an increase in severe acute malnutrition admissions since the funding cuts. The MSF-supported Bay Regional hospital has received patients traveling as far as 190 kilometres for care due to facility closures elsewhere.

    HIV: Cuts to PEPFAR and USAID have led to suspensions and closures of HIV programmes in countries including South Africa, Uganda, and Zimbabwe — threatening the lives of people receiving antiretroviral (ARV) therapy. South Africa’s pioneering Treatment Action Campaign — which helped transform the country’s response to HIV/AIDS — has had to drastically reduce its community-led monitoring system that helps ensure that people stay on treatment. The monitoring is now only happening at a small scale at clinics. In MSF’s programme in San Pedro Sula, Honduras, there has been a 70% increase in pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) tablet distribution from January to March compared to the previous quarter, as well as an increase of 30% in consultations for health services, including for HIV — highlighting the growing demand as USAID funding cuts reduce access to other HIV prevention services.

    Outbreaks: In the border regions across South Sudan and Ethiopia, MSF teams are responding to a rampant cholera outbreak amid escalating violence — while other organisations have scaled down their presence. According to our teams, a number of organisations, including Save the Children, have suspended mobile clinic activities in South Sudan’s Akobo County due to US aid cuts. Save the Children reported earlier this month that at least five children and three adults with cholera died while making the long, hot trek to seek treatment in this part of South Sudan. With the withdrawal of these organisations, local health authorities are now facing significant limitations in their ability to respond effectively to the outbreak. MSF has warned that the disruption of mobile services, combined with the reduced capacity of other actors to support oral vaccination campaigns, increases the risk of preventable deaths and the continued spread of this highly infectious disease.

    Sexual and reproductive healthcare: MSF teams in more than 20 countries have reported concerns with disrupted or suspended sexual and reproductive health programmes, which MSF relies on for referrals for medical emergencies, supplies, and technical partnerships. These include contexts with already high levels of maternal and infant mortality. In Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh — home to one of the world’s largest refugee camps — MSF teams report that other implementers are not able to provide supplies, like emergency birth kits and contraceptives. Referrals for medical emergencies, like post-abortion care, have also been disrupted, increasing urgent needs for sexual and reproductive care in the region.

    Migration: Essential protection services — including shelters for women and children, legal aid, and support for survivors of violence — have been shuttered or severely reduced as needs increase due to changes in US immigration policy. For patients and MSF teams along the Central American migration route in areas like Danlí, San Pedro Sula, Tapachula, and Mexico City, referral networks have all but disappeared. This has left many migrants without safe places to sleep, access to food, or legal and psychosocial support.

    Access to clean water: In the initial weeks following the aid freeze, our teams saw several organisations stop the distribution of drinking water for displaced people in conflict-affected areas, including in Sudan’s Darfur region, Ethiopia’s Tigray region, and Haiti’s capital, Port-au-Prince. In response to the crisis in Port-au-Prince, in March, MSF stepped in to run a water distribution system via tanker trucks to provide for more than 13,000 people living in four camps for communities displaced by violent clashes between armed groups and police. This was in addition to our regular activities focused on providing medical care for victims of violence. Ensuring access to clean drinking water is essential for health and preventing the spread of waterborne diseases like cholera.

    Vaccination: The reported decision by the US to cut funding to Gavi (The Vaccine Alliance) could have disastrous consequences for children across the globe. The organisation estimated that the loss of US support is projected to deny approximately 75 million children routine vaccinations in the next five years, with more than 1.2 million children potentially dying as a result. Worldwide, more than half of the vaccines MSF uses come from local ministries of health and are procured through Gavi. We could see the impacts in places like the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), where MSF vaccinates more children than anywhere else in the world. In 2023 alone, MSF vaccinated more than 2 million people in DRC against diseases like measles and cholera.

    Mental health: In Ethiopia’s Kule refugee camp, where MSF teams run a health centre for more than 50,000 South Sudanese refugees, a US-funded organisation abruptly halted mental health and social services for victims and survivors of sexual violence and withdrew their staff. MSF teams provide other medical care but cannot currently cover the mental health and social services these patients need.

    Non-communicable diseases: In Zimbabwe, US funding cuts have forced a local provider to stop its community outreach activities to identify women to be screened for cervical cancer. Cervical cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death in Zimbabwe, even though it is preventable. Many women and girls — especially in rural areas — cannot afford or do not have access to diagnosis and treatment, which makes outreach, screening, and prevention activities vital. 

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Stakes high as G20 ministers miss opportunity to pursue solidarity, wealth tax

    Source: Greenpeace Statement –

    Washington, D.C. – A meeting of G20 Finance Ministers has failed to deliver a key signal of solidarity as ongoing economic turmoil led to difficult talks in Washington D.C. and slowed progress on critical reforms to tax the world’s super-rich.

    In a disappointing outcome at the 2nd Finance and Central Bank Ministerial Meeting, no reference was made to earlier agreements focused on cooperative efforts to effectively tax the ultra-rich as momentum around the initiative appeared to stall. 

    Fred Njehu, Global Political Lead, Greenpeace Africa, said: “Turbulent economic times like these demand a unified, multilateral response and G20 ministers have an historic obligation to help steer the global economy and environment towards safer waters. This starts with supporting South Africa’s focus on Solidarity, Equality and Sustainability to find real solutions.”

    “G20 ministers must boldly stay the course for what is fair and just, acting in solidarity with each other in opposition to wrecking ball diplomacy to deliver equality and a sustainable future for all. That means international cooperation, not tariff wars or economic blackmail or corporate plunder.”

    “Equality is not the accumulation of wealth and power in the hands of a few billionaires. G20 Finance Ministers have an incredible opportunity to achieve a breakthrough on wealth taxation. We need to stand up to the power of billionaires who are a threat to our safety, security and wellbeing.”

    “The hoarding of wealth and power is eroding democracy, fueling inequality and driving the climate crisis and environmental destruction. We cannot afford to sit idly by and the G20 must show bold and collaborative leadership in times of global need.”

    ENDS

    Contacts:

    Lee Kuen, Global Communications Lead, Fair Share Campaign, Greenpeace International, +60176690211, lkuen@admin

    Greenpeace International Press Desk, +31 (0)20 718 2470 (available 24 hours), [email protected]

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Cameroon: forest communities demand a regional Congo Basin forest day

    Source: Greenpeace Statement –

    Yaoundé, March 21, 2025 – As deforestation accelerates and food security worsens, Indigenous and local communities in Cameroon are demanding urgent action. On the International Day of Forests, Greenpeace Africa and Indigenous leaders called for the creation of a Congo Basin Forest Day—a day to formally recognize the frontline defenders of Africa’s largest rainforest and their fight against environmental destruction

    “One day to honor a lifetime of protection”

    For SM Nkolo Thade, chief of Nyamibete, the initiative is long overdue:

    “Year after year, nothing changes. Our rights remain ignored, and our efforts to protect the forest go unrecognized. Indigenous and local communities are the backbone of forest conservation, yet we are marginalized. One day out of 365 would be a powerful step toward acknowledging our role and our fight to safeguard the planet.”

    This year’s International Day of Forests focuses on “Forests and Food”- a theme that directly impacts communities who rely on the forest for survival. Stella Tchoukep, Forest Campaigner at Greenpeace Africa, warned of the escalating crisis:

    “Food insecurity is skyrocketing across Africa. Destroying forests means destroying the livelihoods of millions. It’s time for conservation funding to go directly to the communities that have protected these forests for generations. Without them, there is no future for these ecosystems.”

    Deforestation, climate change, and a race against time

    Cameroon’s forests are disappearing at an alarming rate. Mining, industrial agriculture, and illegal logging are stripping the land, devastating biodiversity, and deepening poverty. Instead of bringing promised development, these projects push rural communities into crisis.

    “The pressure on Cameroon’s forests is relentless. Expanding agro-industry, mining and deforestation are wiping out ecosystems and driving food insecurity. Climate change is making things worse – erratic rainfall is crushing crop yields, and entire communities are on the brink. As Cameroon drafts its first-ever land policy, it must prioritize the land rights of forest communities before it’s too late,” urged Tchoukep.

    The numbers are alarming: 74% of households report declining harvests, 70% say soil quality is deteriorating, and in 2023, three million Cameroonians – 11% of the population – faced acute food insecurity, according to a study published by the Minister of Agriculture and Rural Development.

    A global movement to safeguard forests

    This crisis is bigger than Cameroon. Greenpeace Africa is pushing for a global response through its Forest Solutions Campaign, bringing together the world’s three largest rainforest basins to champion local solutions and demand real funding for the people protecting these forests.

    The message is clear: time is running out. Without urgent action, the Congo Basin – the planet’s second-largest rainforest – will be lost, along with the communities that live there and protect it. Greenpeace Africa and its allies are calling on governments, international organizations, and the public to stand with Indigenous and local communities in defense of one of the world’s last great forests.

    ENDS

    Contacts:

    Luchelle Feukeng, Communication and Storytelling Manager[email protected], +237 656 46 35 45 

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: US government confirms their support for deep sea mining plans that bypass United Nations, Greenpeace response

    Source: Greenpeace Statement –

    Greenpeace USA activists unfurl a banner calling on the US government to Stop Deep Sea Mining in front of Trump Tower on 5th Avenue in New York City.

    Washington DC, USA, (April 24, 2025) – President Trump today signed a sweeping executive order advancing U.S. ambitions to launch deep sea mining in U.S. and international waters. This rogue action is highly politically controversial for appearing to bypass the International Seabed Authority (ISA), the regulatory body set up by the United Nations to protect the deep sea as the common heritage of humankind and decide whether deep sea mining can start in the international seabed. 

    This unilateral action by the U.S. government fundamentally undermines multilateral cooperation and the United Nations. The Metals Company – a deep sea mining company – recently declared its intent to work with the Trump Administration outside of the UN-established regulatory framework to try to start mining in the Clarion Clipperton Zone in the Pacific – a region that sits outside US jurisdiction. This was met with swift and strong international rebuke. The Executive Order instructs the Secretary of Commerce to expedite the process for reviewing and issuing exploration and commercial recovery permits under the Deep Seabed Hard Mineral Resources Act (DSHMRA), breaking the longstanding tradition of the US being a good-faith actor on UNCLOS (The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea). 

    Arlo Hemphill, Project Lead on Greenpeace USA’s campaign to stop deep sea mining, said: “Authorizing deep-sea mining outside international law is like lighting a match in a room full of dynamite — it threatens ecosystems, global cooperation, and U.S. credibility all at once. We condemn this administration’s attempt to launch this destructive industry on the high seas in the Pacific by bypassing the United Nations process. This is an insult to multilateralism and a slap in the face to all the countries and millions of people around the world who oppose this dangerous industry.”

    “But this Executive Order is not the start of deep sea mining. Everywhere governments have tried to start deep sea mining, they have failed. This will be no different. We call on the international community to stand against this unacceptable undermining of international cooperation by agreeing to a global moratorium on deep sea mining. The United States government has no right to unilaterally allow an industry to destroy the common heritage of humankind, and rip up the deep sea for the profit of a few corporations.”

    Despite now fundamentally moving to undermine the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), the United States has benefited significantly from the Convention [1].  Although these benefits have been disproportionately favorable to a single nation, the Executive Order now undermines this agreement, signaling an end to U.S. leadership in global maritime affairs.

    Hemphill continued: “This is a clear sign that the U.S. will no longer be a global leader on protecting the oceans, which support all life on this planet.”

    Today’s act follows recent negotiations at the ISA, where governments refused to give The Metals Company a clear pathway to an approved mining application via the ISA. This March, the ISA meeting took a notably different tone from previous meetings, with over 20 countries voicing support for a general environmental policy to be developed at the ISA. 

    According to The Metals Company, they will apply for permits “in the second quarter of 2025,” with reports stating intent to commence mining operations as soon as 2027. Gerard Barron, the CEO of The Metals Company, has gone on the record with his company’s willingness and desire to bypass internationally agreed regulations, stating in reference to the ongoing negotiations at the ISA “by all means, go ahead and sign your treaty…we’ll be out there”.

    32 countries around the world publicly support a moratorium on deep sea mining. Millions of people have spoken out against this dangerous emerging industry. ISA Member states and the body’s newly appointed Secretary-General, Leticia Carvalho, swiftly condemned an earlier announcement from TMC, on the penultimate day of the ISA’s 30th Council session, as a blatant attempt to sidestep international law and undermine multilateral governance of the global commons.


    Notes:

    Photos are available in the Greenpeace Media Library.

    [1]

    • UNCLOS codifies the principle of freedom of navigation, advancing U.S. maritime power globally by preserving the right of the U.S. military to use the world’s oceans and for U.S. commercial vessels to carry cargo globally.  It also provides a framework for maintaining maritime security and stability, vital for U.S. national interests. 
    • UNCLOS protects U.S. interests across maritime industries, including fishing, shipping, and offshore extractive industries.
    • In 2024, the U.S. government filed an extended continental shelf claim for a million square miles of the Arctic seabed, a provision authorized to States via UNCLOS for the purposes of securing mineral and oil rights in areas beyond a country’s 200 nautical mile EEZ in places where the continental shelf extends beyond this measure.  The move to claim this extension was criticized by a number of countries due to the U.S.’s failure to ratify the agreement, while continuing to benefit from it.

    Contact: Tanya Brooks, Senior Communications Specialist at Greenpeace USA
    (+1) 703-342-9226, [email protected]  

    Greenpeace USA is part of a global network of independent campaigning organizations that use peaceful protest and creative communication to expose global environmental problems and promote solutions that are essential to a green and peaceful future. Greenpeace USA is committed to transforming the country’s unjust social, environmental, and economic systems from the ground up to address the climate crisis, advance racial justice, and build an economy that puts people first. Learn more at www.greenpeace.org/usa.

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Saudi Arabia: Families fear imminent execution of loved ones amid surge in drug-related executions

    Source: Amnesty International –

    Dozens of men on death row in Saudi Arabia for drug -related crimes are terrified for their lives amid a dramatic surge in executions for drug offences in the country over recent months, Amnesty International said today, based on information from family members of detainees on death row.

    Between January and April 2025, the Saudi Arabian authorities executed at least 88 people including 52 for drug-related crimes. This is a dramatic increase from 2024, which saw record executions, and when a total of 46 people were executed during the same period, none of them for drug-related crimes. Just this week, in one day on 22 April, the Saudi Press Agency announced the execution of three people, two Saudi nationals for “promoting hashish” and one Pakistani national for “trafficking heroin”. 

    “Despite Saudi Arabia’s repeated claims that it is limiting its use of the death penalty for crimes not mandated under sharia, the alarming surge in executions for drug-related offences exposes the stark reality: Saudi Arabia is blatantly disregarding international law and standards, which restrict the use of the death penalty to only ‘the most serious crimes’ involving intentional killing,” said Kristine Beckerle, Deputy Regional Director for the Middle East and North Africa at Amnesty International.

    “Saudi Arabia’s authorities must immediately stop this execution spree, establish an official moratorium on all executions, and move towards abolishing the death penalty for all crimes.”

    Saudi Arabia is blatantly disregarding international law and standards, which restrict the use of the death penalty to only ‘the most serious crimes’ involving intentional killing

    Kristine Beckerle, MENA Deputy Regional Director

    Pending these changes, Saudi Arabia must urgently revise its laws to eliminate provisions that allow for the death penalty to be imposed and ensure that any penal code adopted abolishes the death penalty, including for crimes that do not meet the threshold of ‘most serious crimes’ under international standards, such as drug-related offences, and ensuring that all individuals have access to fair trials and adequate legal representation.

    While Saudi authorities do not publish or share figures of individuals on death row, arrests for drug-related offences are routinely reported in state-aligned media, indicating that a large number of people are in detention and on death row for such offences.

    In November 2024, prison authorities in Tabuk transferred 35 Egyptian nationals convicted of drug-related offences to a single ward, a move widely feared to signal their impending executions. Since November 2024, at least 10 foreign nationals and two Saudi nationals have been executed for drug-related offences in the same prison, raising fears of the imminent executions of the remaining men.

    In addition, as of March 2025, at least 44 Somali nationals, all men, are on death row in Najran Prison, southwestern Saudi Arabia, for drug-related crimes, according to the Somali Consulate in Saudi Arabia. On 16 February 2025, the Saudi Ministry of Interior announced an execution in Najran of Mohamed Nur Hussein, a Somali national, for “smuggling hashish”, also raising fears for the fate of dozens of others on death row.

    One Egyptian man on death row told his family in April: “A few days ago, a Sudanese man was taken in the middle of the night, as we were sleeping.”

    Another deeply distressed family member told Amnesty International: “There is no time left to save them, time is running out.”

    Following a pause, between 20 February to 6 April, a few weeks before and during Ramadan, executions resumed with alarming speed in April and have included a startling surge in drug-related executions of foreign nationals. Between 6 and 24 April 2025, Saudi Arabia executed 22 individuals, more than one per day on average. Of these, 17 were foreign nationals from eight Arab, sub-Saharan African and Asian, including South Asian, countries, all convicted of drug-related crimes. Three Saudi nationals were also executed for drug-related offences, while three other Saudi nationals were put to death for murder and terrorism-related charges.

    Grossly unfair trials

    Amnesty International has documented a pattern of serious fair trial violations preceding executions, including of foreign nationals in Saudi Arabia.

    At least five Egyptian men currently held on death row were unable to afford legal representation due to financial constraints and were not provided with a court-appointed lawyer during investigation nor trial.

    In another case, also of an Egyptian national currently on death row, the individual had a court-appointed lawyer, but the lawyer failed to share crucial case information during the trial to support his defence.

    Several of the Egyptian nationals currently at risk of execution told their families and their judge that they were tortured during their interrogations to extract “confessions”. None of these torture complaints were investigated, according to court documents reviewed by Amnesty International and the torture-tainted “confessions” used as evidence against them.

    Issam Shazly, an Egyptian national convicted and sentenced to death under Article 37 of the Narcotics and Psychotropic Substances Control Law in 2022, had no legal representation during his arrest and investigation. His family told Amnesty International that the court later appointed a legal representative to support his defence, but the lawyer was uncooperative and failed to inform them about crucial details including the possibility of clemency, the deadline to appeal or when to expect the Supreme Court ruling.

    “We knew absolutely nothing because it’s a foreign country and we don’t know its laws. We expected the lawyer to inform us,” they said.

    A Saudi court convicted Rami al-Najjar in 2019 of bringing controlled drugs into Saudi Arabia to sell and eight grams of hashish for personal consumption, according to court documents analyzed by Amnesty International. He did not receive the support of an appointed lawyer. He told Amnesty International that during his appeal session, the judge said that he could not argue against his conviction “because you don’t have a lawyer.” He submitted an appeal himself to the Supreme Judicial Council but received no response. Rami’s family were finally able to appoint a lawyer in early 2025, but they said that, as of March 2025, the lawyer had not taken any action because he was waiting for updates in the case. They said: “I don’t understand what updates other than Rami’s imminent execution there need to be for the lawyer to re-open the case”.

    Mohamed Ahmed Saad and Omar Ahmad Ibrahim were arrested in May 2017 and accused of trafficking the synthetic drug Captagon. They weredetained incommunicado for a year and a half after arrest. They have been on death row for almost eight years. Both men were denied access to legal representation and, according to court documents, “confessed” to the charge after being subjected to severe beatings. On October 9, 2019, the Court of Appeal upheld their death sentence.

    Background

    Saudi Arabia has consistently been one of the world’s countries with the highest number of recorded executions. In 2024, authorities announced the execution of 122 people for drug-related crimes, a significant proportion of the total 345 executions known to have been carried out that year. This sharp rise occurred after a nearly three-year hiatus in such executions, following a moratorium announced by the Saudi Human Rights Commission in January 2021. Last year, Saudi Arabia was one of four countries known to have carried out executions for drug-related offences.

    Amnesty International opposes the death penalty in all cases without exception, regardless of the nature or circumstances of the crime; guilt, innocence or characteristics of the individual; or the method used by the state to carry out the execution.

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: The first 100 days of a growing global health and humanitarian emergency News Apr 24, 2025

    Source: Doctors Without Borders –

    Three months since the Trump administration first suspended all international assistance pending review, the US has terminated much of its funding for global health and humanitarian programs, dismantled the federal government architecture for oversight of these activities, and fired many of the key staff responsible for implementation. 

    Patients around the world are scrambling to understand how they can continue treatment, medical providers are struggling to maintain essential services, and aid groups are sounding the alarm about exploding needs in countries with existing emergencies.

    US assistance has been a lifeline for millions of people–while yanking this support will lead to more preventable deaths and untold suffering around the world. We can’t accept this dangerous new normal. 

    Avril Benoît, CEO of MSF USA

    “These sudden cuts by the Trump administration are a human-made disaster for the millions of people struggling to survive amid wars, disease outbreaks, and other emergencies,” said Avril Benoît, CEO of Doctors Without Borders/Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) in the United States. “We are an emergency response organization, but we have never seen anything like this massive disruption to global health and humanitarian programs. The risks are catastrophic, especially since people who rely on foreign assistance are already among the most vulnerable in the world.”

    “It all started three weeks ago, when I took [my son] to a doctor in the village and he gave him medicine to stop the diarrhea, yet his condition didn’t improve,” says Rawda, whose son Mohammed was finally referred to a field hospital for treatment. | Yemen 2024 © Mario Fawaz/MSF

    People are already feeling the consequences of US aid cuts

    The US has long been the leading supporter of global health and humanitarian programs, responsible for around 40 percent of all related funding. These US investments have helped improve the health and well-being of communities around the globe—and totaled less than 1 percent of the annual federal budget.

    Abruptly ending this huge proportion of support is already having devastating consequences for people who rely on aid, including those at risk of malnutrition and infectious diseases, and those who are trapped in humanitarian crises around the world. These major cuts to US funding and staffing are part of a broader policy agenda that has far-reaching impacts for people whose access to care is already limited by persecution and discrimination, such as refugees and migrants, civilians caught in conflict, LGBTQI+ people, and anyone who can become pregnant.

    We can’t accept this dangerous new normal. We urge the administration and Congress to maintain commitments to support critical global health and humanitarian aid.

    Avril Benoît, CEO of MSF USA

    The status of even the much-reduced number of remaining US-funded programs is highly uncertain. The administration now plans to extend the initial 90-day review period for foreign aid, which was due to conclude on April 20, by an additional 30 days, according to an internal email from the State Department obtained by the media.

    MSF does not accept US government funding, so we are not directly affected by these sweeping changes to international assistance as most other aid organizations are. We remain committed to providing medical care and humanitarian support in more than 70 countries across the world. However, no organization can do this work alone. We work closely with other health and humanitarian organizations to deliver vital services, and many of our activities involve programs that have been disrupted due to funding cuts. It will be much more difficult and costly to provide care when so many ministries of health have been affected globally and there are fewer community partners overall. We will also be facing fewer places to refer patients for specialized services, as well as shortages and stockouts due to hamstrung supply chains.

    Six-month-old Sohaib, who suffers from malnutrition and chickenpox, and his mother traveled four hours from their village to Herat Regional Hospital for care. | Afghanistan 2024 © Mahab Azizi

    Amid ongoing chaos and confusion, our teams are already witnessing some of the life-threatening consequences of the administration’s actions to date. Most recently, the US administration canceled nearly all humanitarian assistance programs in Yemen and Afghanistan, two countries facing some of the most severe humanitarian needs in the world. After years of conflict and compounding crises, an estimated 19.5 million people in Yemen—over half the population—are dependent on aid. The decision to punish civilian populations caught in these two conflicts undermines the principles of humanitarian assistance. 

    Across the world, MSF teams have witnessed US-funded organizations reducing or canceling other vital activities–including vaccination campaigns, protection and care for people caught in areas of conflict, sexual and reproductive health services, the provision of clean water, and adequate sanitation services.

    “It’s shocking to see the US abandon its leadership role in advancing global health and humanitarian efforts,” Benoît said. “US assistance has been a lifeline for millions of people–while yanking this support will lead to more preventable deaths and untold suffering around the world. We can’t accept this dangerous new normal. We urge the administration and Congress to maintain commitments to support critical global health and humanitarian aid.”

    An MSF team member disinfects people entering and exiting MSF’s cholera treatment center with chlorinated water, reducing the risk of spreading cholera through contaminated soil. | South Sudan 2024 © Paula Casado Aguirregabiria

    Snapshot: How US aid cuts are impacting people worldwide

    Malnutrition

    US funding cuts are severely impacting people in areas of Somalia affected by chronic drought, food insecurity, and displacement due to conflict. In the Baidoa and Mudug regions, the scaling down of operations by aid organizations—driven by US funding cuts and a broader lack of humanitarian aid—is making a shortage of health services and nutrition programs even more critical. For example, the closure of maternal and child health clinics and a therapeutic feeding center in Baidoa cut off monthly care to hundreds of malnourished children. MSF nutrition programs in Baidoa have reported an increase in severe acute malnutrition admissions since the funding cuts. The MSF-supported Bay Regional Hospital has received patients traveling as far as 120 miles for care due to facility closures elsewhere.

    HIV

    Cuts to PEPFAR and USAID have led to suspensions and closures of HIV programs in countries including South Africa, Uganda, and Zimbabwe—threatening the lives of people receiving antiretroviral (ARV) therapy. South Africa’s pioneering Treatment Action Campaign—which helped transform the country’s response to HIV/AIDS—has had to drastically reduce its community-led monitoring system that helps ensure that people stay on treatment. The monitoring is now only happening at a small scale at clinics. 

    In MSF’s program in San Pedro Sula, Honduras, there has been a 70 percent increase in pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) tablet distribution from January to March compared to the previous quarter, as well as an increase of 30 percent in consultations for health services, including for HIV—highlighting the growing demand as USAID funding cuts reduce access to other HIV prevention services.

    Inside the pediatric ward at MSF’s cholera treatment center in Assosa. | South Sudan 2024 © Paula Casado Aguirregabiria

    Outbreaks

    In the border regions across South Sudan and Ethiopia, MSF teams are responding to a rampant cholera outbreak amid escalating violence—while other organizations have scaled down their presence. According to our teams, a number of organizations, including Save the Children, have suspended mobile clinic activities in South Sudan’s Akobo County due to US aid cuts. Save the Children reported earlier this month that at least five children and three adults with cholera died while making the long, hot trek to seek treatment in this part of South Sudan. With the withdrawal of these organizations, local health authorities are now facing significant limitations in their ability to respond effectively to the outbreak. MSF has warned that the disruption of mobile services, combined with the reduced capacity of other actors to support oral vaccination campaigns, increases the risk of preventable deaths and the continued spread of this highly infectious disease.

    MSF Japan General Director Shinjiro Murata speaks with a Rohingya family with the help of a medical interpreter after an MSF health promotion session for Rohingya women in Cox’s Bazar. | Bangladesh 2022 © Elizabeth Costa/MSF

    Sexual and reproductive health care

    MSF teams in more than 20 countries have reported concerns with disrupted or suspended sexual and reproductive health (SRH) programs, which MSF relies on for referrals for medical emergencies, supplies, and technical partnerships. These include contexts with already high levels of maternal and infant mortality. In Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh—home to one of the world’s largest refugee camps—MSF teams report that other implementers are not able to provide SRH supplies, like emergency birth kits and contraceptives. Referrals for medical emergencies, like post-abortion care, have also been disrupted, increasing urgent needs for SRH care in the region.

    Migration

    Essential protection services—including shelters for women and children, legal aid, and support for survivors of violence—have been shuttered or severely reduced as needs increase due to changes in US immigration policy. For patients and MSF teams in areas like Danlí, San Pedro Sula, Tapachula, and Mexico City, referral networks have all but disappeared. This has left many migrants without safe places to sleep, access to food, or legal and psychosocial support.

    Access to clean water

    In the initial weeks following the aid freeze, our teams saw several organizations stop the distribution of drinking water for displaced people in conflict-affected areas, including in Sudan’s Darfur region, Ethiopia’s Tigray region, and Haiti’s capital, Port-au-Prince. 

    In response to the crisis in Port-au-Prince, in March, MSF stepped in to run a water distribution system via tanker trucks to provide for more than 13,000 people living in four camps for communities displaced by violent clashes between armed groups and police. This was in addition to our regular activities focused on providing medical care for victims of violence. Ensuring access to clean drinking water is essential for health and preventing the spread of waterborne diseases like cholera.

    André Keli and Stallone Deke, MSF logistician and driver in Kisangani, ensure the final packaging of vaccines before they are loaded for shipment to Bondo, Bas-Uélé. | DR Congo 2021 © Pacom Bagula/MSF

    Vaccination

    The reported decision by the US to cut funding to Gavi, The Vaccine Alliance, could have disastrous consequences for children across the globe. The organization estimated that the loss of US support is projected to deny approximately 75 million children routine vaccinations in the next five years, with more than 1.2 million children potentially dying as a result. Worldwide, more than half of the vaccines MSF uses come from local ministries of health and are procured through Gavi. We could see the impacts in places like the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), where MSF vaccinates more children than anywhere else in the world. In 2023 alone, MSF vaccinated more than 2 million people in DRC against diseases like measles and cholera.

    Narges Naderi, an MSF pharmacist, reviews a child patient’s prescription in the pediatric pharmacy at Mazar-i-Sharif Regional Hospital. | Afghanistan 2024 © Tasal Allahyar

    Mental health

    In Ethiopia’s Kule refugee camp, where MSF teams run a health center for more than 50,000 South Sudanese refugees, a US-funded organization abruptly halted mental health and social services for survivors of sexual violence and withdrew their staff. MSF teams provide other medical care but cannot currently cover the mental health and social services these patients need.

    Non-communicable diseases

    In Zimbabwe, US funding cuts have forced a local provider to stop its community outreach activities to identify women to be screened for cervical cancer. Cervical cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death in Zimbabwe, even though it is preventable. Many women and girls—especially in rural areas—cannot afford or do not have access to diagnosis and treatment, which makes outreach, screening, and prevention activities vital.

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: The relentless and indiscriminate bombing in Ukraine must cease

    Source: Médecins Sans Frontières –

    Kyiv – Last night, Kyiv, Ukraine, faced yet another wave of massive bombardment. This follows devastating attacks in Dnipro region, and Kryvyi Rih, all of which resulted in mass casualties. The massive use of force employed by Russian forces across Ukraine is relentless. Hospitals, residential buildings, humanitarian workers, and patients are not spared; with the use of drones and long-range missiles, no-one in the country is safe.

    Last night’s strikes in Kyiv saw a missile hit a residential building. Emergency services are still searching through the rubble for survivors. Twelve people have been confirmed killed, and over 70 injured—among them, six children. Many remain in hospital, with life-threatening injuries.

    Kyiv is home to the coordination offices of Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) in Ukraine. MSF teams live and work in the city.

    “Right now, our staff—like millions of others—face almost nightly bombing raids,” says Thomas Marchese, MSF Programme Director in Ukraine. “Last night, some of our colleagues spent the night in metro stations; others had no choice but to wake their children and shelter at home as best they could, while explosions shook the ground, and rattled windows. No-one is safe, people are exhausted and many live in fear.”

    This latest attack in Kyiv continues a pattern of bombardments in Ukraine: attacks on residential buildings, hospitals, and schools occur daily. On 5 April, MSF ambulance teams responded to a strike in Kryvyi Rih, where 20 people were killed, including nine children. One survivor referred by MSF paramedics was just seven years old; she suffered a fractured hip, haemorrhagic shock, and shrapnel wounds.

    On 23 April, a drone strike by Russian forces hit a bus in Marhanets, Dnipro region, reportedly killing nine people and wounding 50. MSF ambulance teams supported the Ministry of Health in the mass casualty plan, referring patients suffering from significant blood loss and shrapnel wounds.

    Around 2,000 medical facilities have been damaged or destroyed since the war in Ukraine escalated in 2022. In recent months, hospitals across the country have faced multiple mass casualty events, and have even become targets, particularly in areas near the frontline, where the health system is already under immense pressure.

    “The scale of attacks people endure are huge, our mobile clinics have seen a rise in cases of heart attacks and strokes—conditions directly linked to prolonged stress,” says Marchese. “In Ukraine, no part of daily life is untouched by the war.” 

    “People can be hit while commuting, buying bread, or dropping their children at kindergarten,” continues Marchese. “There’s no warning, no safe place—just seconds between normal life and extreme violence. Civilians must never be targets.”

    MSF paramedic teams are currently supporting emergency responses in Sumy, Dnipropetrovsk, Kharkiv, Kherson, and Mykolaiv regions, while surgical teams continue to provide lifesaving care in hospitals close to active conflict areas. Rehabilitation care, including physiotherapy and mental health care continue in Cherkasy and Odesa, while in Vinnytsia, the mental health team provides treatment for post traumatic stress syndrome caused by the war. Among medical facilities in Ukraine, one thing is a constant: the influx of wounded never truly stops.

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Violence against civilians must end in DRC

    Source: Médecins Sans Frontières –

    • An MSF nurse was shot dead in his home in Masisi, North Kivu province, DRC, the second staff member to be killed in the town in two months.
    • Civilians and aid workers are victims of and witnesses to the horrific levels of violence in the province.
    • MSF calls on the warring parties to protect civilians, their property and aid workers, and for relevant authorities to hold parties accountable.

    Goma, North Kivu – On 18 April, a Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) health worker was shot dead in his home by a gunman in military uniform in Masisi, North Kivu province, in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). A nurse at Masisi general referral hospital, he is the second MSF staff member to be killed in Masisi in the past two months and the third to be fatally shot in North Kivu this year.

    Earlier in the evening of 18 April, two armed men dressed in military fatigues and carrying assault rifles attacked and robbed civilians in Masisi town, before breaking into the house of the MSF nurse to rob residents. During the incident, the attackers opened fire, fatally wounding our colleague with two shots to the chest.

    “We strongly condemn this terrible act, which cost our colleague his life, and which reflects the severely deteriorating security situation we have witnessed in North and South Kivu since the beginning of the year,” said Emmanuel Lampaert, MSF country representative in DRC. “Week after week, our teams are not only witnesses but also victims of violent incidents targeting civilians, humanitarian workers and medical facilities. This must stop immediately.”

    Since early 2025, MSF teams have witnessed violent incidents on an almost daily basis – and have been the victims on a number of occasions. In the space of four months, three MSF staff have been shot dead in North Kivu, either in the course of their work or as a result of violence against civilians.  

    On 20 February, an MSF radio operator on duty at our base in central Masisi was killed in crossfire between VDP/Wazalendo and M23/AFC fighters. A few days later, another MSF worker was shot dead in the middle of the night at his home in Goma. In the past few months, other colleagues have been shot and wounded, the most recent of whom is currently hospitalised in Goma.

    “Even in locations where armed clashes have ceased, insecurity is everywhere,” says Mathilde Guého, MSF head of programmes in North Kivu. “In addition to armed violence that directly affects our hospitals and bases, on a daily basis we are witnessing persistently high levels of crime and repeated violent incidents affecting civilians, especially at night: murders, sexual violence, gunshot wounds, extortion, home invasions, intimidation and more.”

    In response to this series of violent incidents, some 15 of which have directly affected MSF teams, ambulances, offices, and the health facilities we support since January, MSF is calling on the competent authorities to hold those carrying weapons accountable. They must take immediate measures to ensure the safety of civilians and humanitarian workers, to combat crime and to put an end to the abuse our teams witness daily.

    “We remind all parties – M23/AFC, VDP/Wazalendo, FARDC – that the protection of civilians and their property in conflict zones is a legal obligation,” says Lampaert. “All relevant authorities must act urgently to uphold this responsibility.” 

    In DRC, nearly 3,000 locally-hired and international staff work directly for MSF, alongside Ministry of Health staff, to provide medical care to people across the country.
     

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Jane Fonda stands with Greenpeace to defend the oceans at United Nations global oceans talks

    Source: Greenpeace Statement –

    Jane Fonda talks with reporters in the Millennium Hotel outside the United Nations on the United States no-show at major multilateral negotiations to protect the environment. This comes amidst the ongoing lawsuit against Greenpeace US. © Stephanie Keiith / Greenpeace

    New York, United States, 24 April 2025 – Actor and activist Jane Fonda joined Greenpeace’s delegation to the United Nations for a crucial Global Ocean Treaty meeting yesterday. She delivered a rousing address to country delegates, thanking them for their work to protect the global oceans. 

    Agreement on the Global Ocean Treaty is one of the few multilateral processes on protecting nature that has made significant progress in recent years. This progress has continued at the United Nations in recent weeks, despite the United States not sending a delegation for the first time. 

    Jane Fonda said in her address to delegates at the United Nations: “The Global Ocean Treaty is a beacon of hope in these turbulent times. It shows that when we focus on our common humanity and our dependence on a healthy planet, we can push back against the tide of extraction and corporate greed.”

    Delegates have made strong progress in the last two weeks on setting up the first Ocean Conference of Parties (COP), which will be the UN body that brings the Global Ocean Treaty to life at sea. [1]

    In a separate press event, outside the UN, Jane Fonda also highlighted attempts by the current US administration to undermine multilateralism from outside the United Nations: “Hope for the future of our planet is still possible even as President Trump is trying to tear down multilateralism, undermine international processes to protect nature and stop environmental groups like Greenpeace from working to protect our planet.”

    “Trump’s administration is trying to silence this movement — and the truth. They know protest works — that’s why they’re trying to make the stakes so high no one will be willing to take the risk. That’s why Greenpeace in the US and Greenpeace International have been sued by Big Oil company Energy Transfer for hundreds of millions of dollars.” [2]

    Arlo Hemphill, Greenpeace USA’s Oceans Are Life campaign lead, said: “While the Trump Administration has retreated from global efforts to protect life on our planet, such as the climate COP, and has waged a desperately short-sighted war on the environment that only benefits a few billionaires, these two weeks have been a glimmer of hope. Other nations have risen to the occasion, demonstrating the leadership needed to ensure we’re making significant headway on protecting our oceans. There is still much to accomplish to bring the Treaty into effect, and we encourage these countries to maintain their momentum towards building something that will last long beyond the turmoil of this moment, beyond a single administration, something that will last for generations. We must use this Treaty to protect at least 30% of the world’s oceans by 2030, and to keep this target alive, governments must ratify it as soon as possible in 2025.”

    The Trump administration recently issued an Executive Order that opens vast swaths of protected ocean to commercial exploitation, including areas within the Pacific Islands Heritage Marine National Monument. It allows commercial fishing in areas long considered off-limits due to their ecological significance—despite overwhelming scientific consensus that marine sanctuaries are essential for rebuilding fish stocks and maintaining ocean health. These actions threaten some of the most sensitive and pristine marine ecosystems in the world.

    Greenpeace USA activists displayed a vast banner earlier this week, outside the United Nations headquarters, reading “Protect the Oceans.” The team also wore t-shirts with the message “We Will Not Be Silenced,” reiterating the organization’s commitment to continue advocating for environmental protection in the wake of the recent $660M jury verdict against Greenpeace entities in a lawsuit brought by pipeline company Energy Transfer.

    Photos and videos are available in the Greenpeace Media Library.


    Notes

    -Full transcripts of Jane Fonda’s speeches are available on request.

    -Jane Fonda is a longtime Greenpeace supporter. She was at the UN during the final negotiations on the global Ocean treaty in February 2023 to meet with delegates and hand over more than 5.5 million signatures petition to the President of the negotiations Rena Lee  

    [1] The Global Ocean Treaty will only enter into force 120 days after 60 countries have ratified. The UN Secretary-General is required to convene the first meeting of the ocean COP to the Agreement no later than one year after its entry into force.

    [2] https://www.greenpeace.org/usa/energy-transfer-lawsuit-verdict/ 

    Contacts in New York:

    Other contacts:

    • Greenpeace International Press Desk: [email protected] +31 (0) 20 718 2470 (available 24 hours)
    • Tanya Brooks, Senior Communications Specialist at Greenpeace USA, [email protected]  

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Algeria: Authorities step up crackdown on peaceful dissent in the face of new expressions of discontent

    Source: Amnesty International –

    In response to a new online protest movement and in the lead up to the sixth anniversary of the Hirak movement in February 2025, Algerian authorities have intensified their relentless clampdown on peaceful dissent through arbitrary arrests and unjust prosecutions leading to lengthy prison sentences, said Amnesty International.

    Over the past five months, Algerian authorities have arrested and convicted at least 23 activists and journalists, particularly in relation to their support to the “Manich Radi” [I am not satisfied] online protest movement, launched in December 2024 to denounce restrictions on human rights and difficult socioeconomic conditions in the country. All have been detained solely for the peaceful exercise of their human rights, with the majority currently serving prison sentences or awaiting trial.

    Nothing can justify detaining and jailing people solely for having expressed dissatisfaction about political and socioeconomic conditions.

    Heba Morayef, Amnesty International’s Regional Director for the Middle East and North Africa.

    “The trajectory of suffocating online activism pursued by the Algerian authorities is alarming and must be reversed. Nothing can justify detaining and jailing people solely for having expressed dissatisfaction about political and socioeconomic conditions. All those detained solely for the peaceful exercise of their right to freedom of expression must be immediately released,” said Heba Morayef, Amnesty International’s Regional Director for the Middle East and North Africa.

    Amnesty International investigated nine illustrative cases of activists and journalists targeted for their online expression. Seven of them were convicted and sentenced to prison terms ranging from 18 months to five years solely for their online expression and activism. Five defendants were tried in expedited proceedings that did not provide time for adequate defence, undermining their right to a fair trial. Authorities also detained an activist and a journalist for several days and subjected the latter to an abusive and arbitrary ban on travel and issuing publications.

    The latest spate of arbitrary arrests and unjust prosecutions demonstrates the Algerian authorities’ clear resolve to crush all expressions of discontent.

    Heba Morayef, Amnesty International’s Regional Director for the Middle East and North Africa.

    “The latest spate of arbitrary arrests and unjust prosecutions demonstrates the Algerian authorities’ clear resolve to crush all expressions of discontent online and punish people simply for exercising their human rights and denouncing injustice,” said Heba Morayef.

    Authorities must end their crackdown on peaceful dissent and stop punishing the legitimate exercise of the right to freedom of expression. Authorities should also promptly, thoroughly, independently, impartially, transparently and effectively investigate allegations of human rights violations and bring to justice anyone suspected to be responsible in fair trial. Authorities should also ensure access to justice and effective remedies for victims.

    The organization’s findings are based on a review of relevant court rulings, legal documents, relevant social media content posted by the victims, media reports and interviews with 11 people who provided consent for publication.  

    On 11 March 2025, the Bejaia Court upheld the conviction of activists Soheib Debbaghi and Mahdi Bazizi in expedited trial proceedings, sentencing them to 18 months in prison and a fine of DZA 100,000 (EUR 693). The conviction relates to the launch of the “Manich Radi” movement by Soheib Debbaghi and Samy Bazizi – Mahdi Bazizi’s brother, who lives in Canada – in December 2024 to express their frustration with the political and socioeconomic situation in Algeria, including the repression of human rights. The hashtag was relayed by thousands of people and drew comments from Algerian President Abdelmajid Tebboune, who stated on 24 December 2024: “Let no one think that Algeria can be preyed upon by a hashtag”.

    Soheib Debbaghi was convicted of “publishing content harmful to national interest”, “publishing content harmful to national order and security” and “inciting an unarmed gathering” based on social media posts relaying the “#Manich_Radi” hashtag. Mahdi Bazizi was convicted of “hiding a person to obstruct the course of justice” in reference to Soheib Debbaghi’s attempt to avoid arrest.

    On 20 January 2025, only four days after his arrest, the tribunal of Rouiba in Algiers sentenced renowned activist and poet Mohamed Tadjadit to five years in prison and a DZD 500,000 (EUR 3,465) fine following expedited proceedings. His conviction was solely based on social media content and digital communications, including posts relaying the “#Manich_Radi” hashtag and poetry with political messages. The court found him guilty of “undermining national unity”, “publishing content harmful to national interest”, “inciting to an unarmed gathering” and “offending public bodies”.

    On 4 March, the tribunal of Tizi Ouzou, northeastern Algeria, also convicted activist Belaid Charfi of “publishing content harmful to national interest” and sentenced him to four years in prison and a DZD 100,000 (EUR 693) fine and DZD 10,000 (EUR 69) in civil damages. The conviction followed expedited trial proceedings and was solely based on social media posts including sharing the “Manich_Radi” hashtag and other political messages denouncing the detention of other activists and the deteriorating socioeconomic conditions.

    Authorities also arrested activist and unionist Fadhila Hammas on 21 February 2025 in the northeastern town of Azazga. Police questioned her about her opinions and Facebook posts on political and human rights issues. Four days later, a public prosecutor ordered her release pending her trial on 11 May for “publishing false information susceptible to harm public order and security.” If convicted, she faces up to three years in prison.

    On 16 February 2025, the Court of Ouargla, eastern Algeria, upheld the conviction of activist “Abla” Derama Kemari and sentenced her to three years in prison – including one year suspended – and a fine of DZD 300,000 (EUR 2,079). Authorities convicted her on charges of “offense to the president” and “creating an online account to incite hatred and discrimination” for Facebook posts denouncing socioeconomic issues in the Algerian Saharan regions and the repression of activists.

    On 14 January 2025, the Court of Tizi Ouzou also upheld a verdict against activist Massinissa Lakhal in connection with his online activities. The court sentenced him to three years in prison and DZD 5,000,000 (EUR 34,645) in fines as well as DZD 200,000 (EUR 1,386) in civil damages based on his activity on Facebook, including following accounts and sharing publications allegedly supporting the Movement for Self-Determination of the Kabylie (MAK) — which the authorities designated as “terrorist” in a process not conforming with international human rights standards. His conviction was also based on his ties with other MAK activists, including his father, Ammar Lakhal, a former MAK representative in Canada.

    Among the journalists targeted by the authorities is Abdelwaheb Moualek who was convicted by the tribunal of Sidi Aich in Bejaia on 25 February following expedited proceedings, without a lawyer. He was found guilty of “publishing content harmful to national interest” and sentenced to 18 months in prison and a fine of DZA 100,000 (EUR 693) for a Facebook publication commenting on repression. He remains free pending appeal.

    On 2 January 2025 an investigative judge at the tribunal of Annaba, eastern Algeria, questioned journalist Mustapha Bendjama about his Facebook publications and placed him under judicial supervision for publishing content “harmful to national interest” and “false information susceptible to harm public order and security”. The judge imposed a formal travel ban on him for travel out of Algeria and out of the region of Annaba and banned him from issuing publications that could “undermine national interest”.

    Background

    Since the “Hirak” protest movement began in February 2019, the Algerian authorities have weaponized the criminal justice system to clamp down on peaceful dissent, arbitrarily arresting and prosecuting hundreds of activists, human rights defenders, protesters, and journalists for exercising their rights to peaceful assembly, association and expression, notably on social media, leading to a steady erosion of human rights in the country.

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: The first 72 hours of a cholera outbreak

    Source: Médecins Sans Frontières –

    Infectious diseases specialist Diyani Dewasurendra was on assignment in Malakal, South Sudan, when a cholera outbreak began. She goes through what happened during the first 72 hours and explains why vaccination is important for bringing outbreaks under control.

    Diyani Dewasurendra, infectious disease specialist Every epidemic begins with a suspicion – a sudden rise in illness, recurring symptoms and the first severely ill patients. In crisis zones, infectious diseases can spread at lightning speed. Every minute counts when trying to contain them. The first 72 hours are critical: we need to act fast and strategically to save lives and prevent a disaster.

    Infectious diseases specialist Diyani Dewasurendra checks on a child at the MSF hospital in Malakal. South Sudan, 2023.

    Hour 0–12: first signs and initial measures

    At our hospital in Malakal, we suddenly saw a spike in children arriving with severe diarrhoea. In a region with limited access to safe water, that’s a red flag. On top of that, it was March – the final month of the dry season. Since November, there had been almost no rainfall and many water sources had dried up.

    We knew cholera was a possibility – but we had to be sure.

    We collected samples and sent them to the lab. At the same time, we began monitoring case numbers. As soon as the first tests came back positive for cholera, we had to act quickly. The outbreak was now officially confirmed – and every minute counted.

    In a region where many people lack access to clean water, a disease like cholera can escalate quickly. One of the most dangerous aspects is that the only available water source is often a river – the same river where animals bathe, where people wash themselves, and from which they drink. In situations like this, contamination with germs can have catastrophic consequences. 

    Hour 12–24: isolation and protection measures

    The top priority is to stop the disease from spreading further. We immediately set up a cholera isolation ward at the hospital. In Malakal, this was especially challenging, as we already had a separate isolation area for measles. We had to ensure that patients with the two highly contagious diseases wouldn’t come into contact and that other patients would remain protected from infection.

    At the same time, we started prevention efforts: we installed additional handwashing stations and educated the public about the importance of hygiene and handwashing.

    Our health promoters went into surrounding communities to explain the early symptoms of cholera and when to seek treatment. Cholera is a severe diarrhoeal illness and diseases like this are especially dangerous for small children. Though treatable, an infection can lead to death within just a few hours if left untreated.

    Hour 24–48: treating patients and identifying the source

    While treating the first patients, we also assessed the water supply. In many parts of South Sudan, there are no wells or pumps – people collect water from rivers or ponds, which are often contaminated.

    I remember one situation where a mass cattle die-off occurred and hundreds of carcasses were left lying along the riverbank. Yet people had no choice – they had to continue drinking from the river. Many didn’t realise that the water could be dangerous.

    Together with the World Health Organization (WHO) and other partners, we tested the water quality and investigated potential sources of contamination. We knew we couldn’t just treat the disease – we had to prevent more people from getting infected.

    That’s why we started distributing clean water. In some villages, we used charcoal filters or chlorine treatment to improve the water supply in the long term. We also installed sanitation facilities like latrines.

    Hour 48–72: vaccination campaign and epidemic control

    Now the goal was not just to slow down the outbreak, but to bring it under control. In addition to treating those already infected, the next major step was vaccination. Cholera can be contained with an oral vaccine – a major advantage, as it allows us to quickly and efficiently vaccinate large groups of people.

    Before starting the vaccination campaign for the community, we had to protect our medical teams. Doctors, nurses and support staff are in direct contact with patients, so vaccination is essential for their survival. Only after that could we begin the large-scale rollout for the affected communities.

    Education also played a crucial role. In crisis areas, people are not generally sceptical of vaccines – but often, they simply don’t know that a vaccine exists. As soon as we explained the purpose and benefits of the vaccine to the first groups, acceptance increased rapidly.

    Acting fast saves lives

    The first 72 hours of an epidemic determine whether it can be contained or spirals into a disaster. In the case of the 2023 cholera outbreak, we were able to respond quickly and limit the number of cases to 1,471. After 90 days, on 16 May 2023, intervention was closed as the cases decreased significantly and the outbreak was contained.

    This outbreak once again showed how crucial are early diagnosis, isolation, identifying the source of infection and fast vaccination. Each of these steps is vital to saving lives.

    We work under extremely difficult conditions in crisis zones, but access to vaccines remains one of our most powerful tools in the fight against epidemics. At the same time, we must not forget that long-term solutions – such as access to clean water – are just as important to prevent future outbreaks.

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Toxic threat: New Greenpeace report outlines unacceptable risk of nuclear waste in Australia

    Source: Greenpeace Statement –

    SYDNEY, Thursday 24 April 2025 — A new report from Greenpeace Australia Pacific has shown the Coalition’s nuclear plan could produce 14 billion Coke cans’ worth of radioactive waste a year, warning it is a matter of when, not if, a nuclear waste accident could occur in Australia.

    Released in the lead-up to the 39th anniversary of the Chernobyl nuclear disaster, the report, ‘Toxic threat: The danger of nuclear waste in Australia’ shows that the Coalition has grossly understated the volume of dangerous waste its nuclear plan will produce — 14 billion times more than the ‘single coke can’ for a small modular reactor touted by Peter Dutton.

    The report also outlines the unacceptable risk this waste poses to Australian communities, and warns Australia’s long history of nuclear waste management failures point to a very high likelihood of future nuclear disaster. 

    Joe Rafalowicz, Head of Climate and Energy at Greenpeace Australia Pacific, said: “Peter Dutton’s nuclear plan is a dangerous and expensive disaster waiting to happen. From Chernobyl to Fukushima, the devastation of nuclear disasters is a risk that Australia cannot afford to, and doesn’t need to, take. 

    “Australians don’t need the equivalent of 14 billion Coke cans of radioactive nuclear waste every year. The Coalition has not offered a credible plan for how it will manage nuclear waste safely, nor how it will fund this multibillion dollar effort. 

    “Australia’s unenviable track record of mismanaging even low-level nuclear waste, as well as a history of radioactive incidents in the US, UK and EU, reveals how complex it is to manage nuclear waste safely. Multiplying that challenge many times over by building a fleet of nuclear reactors could have devastating consequences for communities and ecosystems. 

    “International examples show that accidents, natural disasters, and other waste management failures occur with alarming regularity. A nuclear waste accident could lead to mass casualties, long-term health impacts, and the contamination of groundwater, farmland, and ecosystems for millennia. The clean-up bill from an incident would be astronomical, costing billions of dollars. 

    “Australia doesn’t need nuclear energy, which is just a smokescreen to prolong the use of climate-wrecking coal and gas for decades. We are almost halfway to powering the nation with clean, affordable wind and solar, and should be supercharging efforts to get to 100% renewables backed by storage.

    “The Coalition has not asked communities like Collie, Latrobe Valley and the Hunter Valley for their consent to build nuclear reactors and waste dumps in their backyards, but the upcoming Federal Election is a chance for voters to have a say in Australia’s energy future. Peter Dutton’s nuclear plan is too dangerous to proceed, and Australians should strongly reject the idea of nuclear energy here.” 

    —ENDS—

    Note to editors: Images of a recent Greenpeace anti-nuclear protest at the Coalition’s election campaign launch party are available here

    For more information or to arrange an interview, please contact Vai Shah on 0452 290 082 / [email protected]

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Peru: Enacted law hinders freedom of expression and association and jeopardizes access to justice for victims

    Source: Amnesty International –

    Lima, 15 April 2025

    Amnesty International rejects the recent enactment of the law that modifies the creation of the Peruvian Agency for International Cooperation (APCI), a norm that violates freedom of expression, freedom of association and access to justice for hundreds of victims in Peru.

    On the grounds of seeking to strengthen the work of the APCI, this law proposes undue control over the work of civil society organizations, which leaves the door open to arbitrary decisions, discretionality and the censoring of voices that are critical of and inconvenient for those in power, and can undermine the accountability of the state.

    During the act marking the enactment of this law, President Dina Boluarte declared that it would “place under comprehensive review a minority of NGOs that act against the interests of our country, sowing hatred and attacking our system”.

    “We are concerned that the president of Peru is enacting a norm that is contrary to human rights, as well as the language used in the announcement. The highest authority in the country is sending a message that it will not accept criticism or dissenting voices, in a discourse that is contrary to freedom of expression and any voice considered critical of state policies and decisions. It is unfortunate that the president should publicly stigmatize civil society organizations,” said Marina Navarro, director of Amnesty International Peru.

    We are concerned that the president of Peru is enacting a norm that is contrary to human rights, as well as the language used in the announcement. The highest authority in the country is sending a message that it will not accept criticism or dissenting voices, in a discourse that is contrary to freedom of expression and any voice considered critical of state policies and decisions. It is unfortunate that the president should publicly stigmatize civil society organizations

    Marina Navarro, director of Amnesty International Peru

    Civil society organizations are already subject to permanent monitoring and oversight procedures, which is essential for transparency in their work. However, the excessive control proposed under the approved amendment, given the discretionality that public officials will be able to exert over the work of human rights organizations, can promote self-censorship and unduly limit the issues and strategies these organizations work on.

    Amnesty International also expresses its concern about the access to justice of hundreds of victims of human rights violations, since the law establishes as a “very serious” offence the use of development funds to advise, finance or assist administrative or judicial actions in national or international instances against the Peruvian state. This measure, in addition to undermining the right of access to justice for those who cannot afford the costs associated with lengthy and onerous legal proceedings, may result in the imposition of sanctions that lead to the closure of organizations and undermine the right to defend human rights.

    “We would like to point out once again that the reduction of civic space puts many advances made in human rights at risk. Civil society organizations can serve as a counterbalance when the state violates human rights, as they make injustices visible, defend and assist people in need, and propose concrete solutions with expert knowledge based on experience,” said Ana Piquer, Americas director at Amnesty International.

    We would like to point out once again that the reduction of civic space puts many advances made in human rights at risk. Civil society organizations can serve as a counterbalance when the state violates human rights, as they make injustices visible, defend and assist people in need, and propose concrete solutions with expert knowledge based on experience

    Ana Piquer, Americas director at Amnesty International

    The organization urges the authorities to repeal this norm and respect the international human rights treaties to which Peru is a party.

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Trapped and abused migrant workers experiences in Lebanon

    Source: Médecins Sans Frontières –

    Mahi* was forced to sleep on the balcony even during winter. Martha* was sexually harassed — but no one believed her. Beatrice has to answer to another name. Makdes* was subjected to verbal, physical, and psychological abuse. These are just some of the experiences migrant workers have disclosed to Médecins Sans Frontières’ (MSF) medical and mental health teams in Lebanon’s capital, Beirut.

    An estimated 176,500 migrants are living in Lebanon, and about 70 per cent are women. Most emigrated from Asian and African countries, predominantly Ethiopia, Bangladesh, and Sudan. Almost half of the migrants in Lebanon are domestic workers, which means they live with their employers, often in challenging environments.  

    MSF runs a clinic in Bourj Hammoud, a northern suburb of Beirut that serves as a hub for many vulnerable communities in Lebanon. While the clinic’s services are open to all, the majority of our patients are migrants.  

    Joygom and Sujon, two patients, in the waiting room of the MSF clinic in Bourj Hammoud. Lebanon, March 2025.
    Myriam Boulos/Magnum

    Often people have chosen to leave their home country in search of a better life but find themselves trapped in a system that excludes them from the laws that protect other workers’ rights. It can rob them of their choices, rights, and even their voice.

    Migrant workers come to Lebanon through the kafala sponsorship system. Under this system — which at its worst is described by human rights activists and organisations as amounting to “modern-day slavery” — migrant domestic workers are overworked and underpaid, sometimes not paid at all, and often given no breaks or days off. Our teams have witnessed the serious implications these conditions have on people’s health.

    The stories we hear in our clinic intersect in many ways. The sponsor often takes away their employee’s agency as well as their legal documents. Migrant workers who live with their employers are isolated from the world, sometimes denied their right to communicate with anyone outside of the household, including their families back home. If they want to leave, migrant domestic workers can only be matched with another family or allowed to go back to their home countries if the sponsor consents. 

    Ahmet*, a migrant in Lebanon I have freedom, but I feel like I’m in prison. I don’t know anything about the outside world, my mind is constantly turning. I worry about everything. If my heart gives out, what will happen to my son?

    Short caption: Ahmet* lives with her 2-year-old son in a small rooftop apartment in Mar Elias, Beirut, along with seven other migrants. She travelled from Bangladesh to Lebanon eight years ago. Long caption: Ahmet* is currently raising her 2-year-old son in Lebanon on her own, with help from her seven flatmates. Her husband was arrested and deported to Bangladesh for not having a valid work permit. Since Ahmet* suffers from chronic heart problems, she’s not able to work, and among her needs are healthcare expenses and milk and diapers for her baby. *Name changed to protect identity
    © Myriam Boulos/Magnum

    Some women who decide to leave their employer’s home find support within the migrant communities, but many are left homeless, without legal documents, and in need of urgent assistance. Should they choose to go back to their country, they might not have the resources for arranging their paperwork or buying a flight ticket. Some choose to stay in Lebanon despite the hardship because they have nowhere to go, or because they need to feed their families.

    Migrants’ access to healthcare in Lebanon is severely limited. Under kafala, an employer can obstruct their employee’s right to seek healthcare. Other migrants not bound by kafala are frequently turned away from hospitals and health centres, either for not having legal documents or because they are not Lebanese. Some people avoid seeking hospital care altogether, fearing they will be turned away, deported, or asked for money. 

    At the MSF clinic in Bourj Hammoud, our teams are responding to migrants’ medical needs, offering basic consultations, sexual and reproductive health services, and mental health services, including psychiatric consultations. We have also been covering the cost of referrals for hospitalisation in life-threatening cases.

    Makdes*, a migrant in Lebanon For the 15 days I spent in that house, I would wait until everyone was asleep to sneak some bread or an orange. I was living on scraps.

    Short caption : Makdes*, 22, lives in an Ethiopian shelter in Beirut. She made the trip to Lebanon around 7 months ago, but her experience working in the country was traumatising for her. Long caption: The first family Makdes* lived with made her work under impossible conditions. For 15 days, they never gave her any food, and she had to do housework on an empty stomach, until she became bedridden with exhaustion. Unfortunately, her experience with the second family was tougher for her. Her employer would always yell at her, slap her hand to “teach” her tasks, and scare her for leisure. *Name changed to protect identity
    © Myriam Boulos/Magnum

    “In 2024, psychiatric consultations in the Bourj Hammoud clinic have doubled compared to the previous year,” says Elsa Saikali, MSF mental health supervisor. “Migrant workers are often dehumanised, subjected to racism and discrimination, and exposed to physical and sexual abuse. All this has deep repercussions on their psychological wellbeing.”

    Many migrants in Lebanon face a language barrier, further limiting their ability to access healthcare. They are obliged to sign documents and speak in Arabic. 

    “MSF is one of the rare organisations in Lebanon offering translations to migrants during mental health sessions,” says Elsa Saikali. “What makes our clinic special is the presence of community health educators for patients. They are MSF staff from the migrant communities who facilitate patient bonding, build trust, and make sure the patient is properly informed about their health status”.

    Migrant communities in Lebanon have needs that span beyond medical care. It is difficult to tell patients to take care of their mental health if they are experiencing homelessness or unable to feed themselves. 

    “My job is to refer patients to services that are beyond MSF’s ability to respond to,” says Hanan Hamadi, MSF social worker at the Bourj Hammoud clinic. “The patients who come to me have the most basic needs, such as shelter, food items, and cash assistance. I refer them to other organisations offering these services.”

    Migrants’ socio-economic situations were exacerbated during the recent Israeli war in Lebanon. Many have disclosed to MSF teams that they were abandoned by their employers, leaving them on the streets or locking them up in their houses in war-affected areas. 

    During that period, migrant community leaders helped MSF teams reach the migrants most in need of assistance in overcrowded shelters and apartments, where we donated essential relief items and delivered medical care through a mobile clinic. 

     An Ethiopian shelter in Beirut. Lebanon, February 2025.
    Myriam Boulos/Magnum

    Programmes for migrants in Lebanon run by local and international organisations have reduced over the years — leaving a gap in resources for migrants.

    “It is getting increasingly difficult to refer our patients to other organisations offering assistance to migrants in Lebanon,” says Hanan Hamadi. “This is due to the scarce funding allocated to programmes supporting migrants and the defunding or closure of others. This is not a recent issue, as it’s been happening for a while.”

    One of the biggest challenges MSF teams in Lebanon are facing is the referral of patients for hospitalisation, including for psychiatric emergencies. Organisations with scarce funding might stop covering hospitalisation for migrants. Should these organisations scale down their support for hospitalisation, MSF alone cannot cover the gap, and many people’s needs will go unmet. 

    *Names have been changed. 

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Meet three female Indigenous anti-war activists from Russia

    Source: Amnesty International –

    During Russia’s escalating repression following its full-scale invasion of Ukraine, 172 indigenous and decolonial organisations have been designated as “terrorist” by the Russian authorities.

    Amnesty International spoke to three female Indigenous rights activists from Russia, currently in exile, to discuss the impact of Russia’s war in Ukraine on their activism, their communities and women’s leadership.

    Zarema Gasanova is an Avar indigenous rights and feminist activist from Dagestan, Victoria Maladaeva is a Buryat-Mongolian activist and co-founder of the Indigenous of Russia Foundation, while Viliuia Choinova is an environmental engineer and Sakha activist from the Republic of Sakha, currently studying in Berlin.

    Amnesty: How did Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine affect indigenous women in Russia?

    Victoria: Even before the war, women in Russia lacked protection from domestic violence. In the republics with a significant Indigenous population, such as Yakutia, Buryatia or the republics of the North Caucasus, men have been disproportionately affected by the military draft.

    In one village in Buryatia, local women raised the alarm as all the men from the village were drafted to be sent to fight in Ukraine. Now, as the drafted troops return home, there are reports of rising rates of domestic abuse and femicide.

    The Free Yakutia Foundation reported numerous cases of violence against women at the hands of men returning from the war. This is just the beginning; there will likely be even more cases when tens of thousands of soldiers return home.   

    Viliuia: Many Indigenous families in the north, including those in my native Republic of Sakha, rely on traditional subsistence activities such as reindeer herding, fishing, and farming. With men drafted en masse to fight Ukraine, women are left to take on physically demanding tasks that were traditionally shared or primarily carried out by men. This has significantly increased their workload and made survival more difficult, especially in regions with poor infrastructure and harsh climates.

    The war has also disrupted the ability to maintain traditional cultural practices, which require generational knowledge often carried by men, risking the loss of cultural continuity. With Indigenous populations already declining due to high mortality rates and low birth rates, the disproportionate drafting of Indigenous men further exacerbates this issue, threatening the long-term survival of Indigenous peoples.

    Zarema: While men are disproportionately drafted to the army, women are left to bear the brunt of resistance. When Vladimir Putin announced military mobilization in September 2022, large numbers of women in Dagestan came out to the streets to protest it. They confronted officials, reminding them that it’s not Ukraine that invaded Russia, formed barricades to block police cars and tried to liberate those arrested by the police. During the protest dispersals, police were particularly violent towards women – they pushed, beat, dragged and verbally abused them.

    Victoria: Indeed, it is women who hide their husbands and relatives from mobilization. Almost all requests for help I receive are from women searching for ways to keep their sons, husbands, or fathers from being sent to war. It is Indigenous women who write letters, reach out to human rights organizations, and fight for their loved ones.   

    Amnesty: How did the full-scale invasion affect your activism?

    Viliuia: Speaking out against Russia’s war in Ukraine and its colonial policies has become increasingly dangerous, with Indigenous activists facing imprisonment, exile, or violence. The recent designation of 172 Indigenous and ethnic organizations as “terrorist” has criminalized Indigenous activism, making legal operations nearly impossible and forcing many into exile or underground work.

    Despite the challenges, the conflict has also created new opportunities for collaboration, as international organizations are now paying greater attention to Indigenous issues in Russia and strengthening global solidarity with other decolonial movements.

    Zarema: I had to leave Russia due to the risk of persecution for my anti-war position. Now in exile, my activism has shifted towards raising awareness internationally, supporting Indigenous communities in resisting militarization, as well as creating networks of solidarity among Indigenous peoples facing similar struggles.

    The full-scale invasion has made Indigenous activism more dangerous, especially in the North Caucasus. Russia’s colonial narratives have long portrayed the Caucasus as aggressive and marginalized. The government frames any activism in the region as a threat to the state and labels Indigenous activists as societal dangers, making their dissent appear more menacing.

    Despite these challenges, Indigenous activists continue to speak out, drawing attention to systemic injustices and advocating for their communities.

    Victoria: Since the start of the war in Ukraine, my activism became more visible, and now I frequently receive threats. Although I don’t live in Russia, I have to take safety precautions, as there are threats to get to me even here in the United States. My social media accounts are constantly under attack, and at one point, I was receiving 3-5 hacking attempt notifications on my Instagram per day. 

    Despite that, activism has also introduced me to courageous and honest people from different regions. We are all united by a common struggle – the fight for the survival of our peoples. We are building networks of solidarity and working on joint projects. Together, we are strong, and we are each other’s support. 

    Amnesty: In a country like Russia, where most influential politicians are men, many Indigenous rights groups from Russia are led by women. What is the reason for this?

    Viliuia: The female leadership of the Indigenous rights movements reflects both Indigenous social structures and the colonial system. In the Republic of Sakha, societal roles between men and women have traditionally been more equal, with women often serving as matriarchs and playing central roles in decision-making, economic activities, and cultural preservation. This strong presence in both domestic and public life has translated into leadership in activism.

    In my family, women have been ambitious, pursuing university degrees, owning small businesses, and even becoming auto mechanics. Meanwhile, men have continued traditional ways of life or taken on practical jobs in housing, communal services, driving, and mining. This contrast mirrors a broader reality in Indigenous communities, where women often lead in education, business, and activism, while men are drawn to physically demanding labour that keeps them away from home for long periods.

    Zarema:  Indigenous women have a strong tradition of resistance, driven by their responsibility to preserve language, culture, and traditions under colonial oppression. Grassroots movements like Feminist Anti-War Resistance intersect feminist and decolonial agendas, providing a space for Indigenous women to combat both gender-based and colonial oppression. The authoritarian nature of the Russian government leaves no room for Indigenous political participation, forcing women to turn to grassroots activism.

    Zarema: There are multiple ways to support us. People from outside Russia can help amplify our voices by sharing our stories and perspectives. International media can help us challenge Russian propaganda and the Kremlin’s narratives that use Indigenous peoples as symbols of loyalty to the state. International organisations can help us advocate for Indigenous rights at international institutions like the UN, ensuring that Indigenous voices from Russia are included in discussions about human rights and decolonization. They can also help us establish connections between Indigenous activists from Russia and those from other colonized regions. Shared experiences and strategies can strengthen resistance efforts.

    By supporting Indigenous women in Russia, the international community contributes to both anti-war efforts and the broader fight for Indigenous rights and decolonization.

    Victoria: One of the biggest challenges we face is the lack of financial support for our projects. Indigenous organizations are not only marginalized but often have to operate on a volunteer basis. Having support in accessing funding would help us to step up our efforts.

    Viliuia: Despite the importance of our presence in global advocacy spaces, it remains difficult for Indigenous peoples to access these platforms, due to financial constraints, bureaucratic visa processes and exclusionary institutional structures. Addressing these challenges is essential to ensuring Indigenous perspectives are not just included, but prioritized in global decision-making processes.

    The war in Ukraine has exposed Russia’s colonial nature more clearly than ever before. Indigenous women from Russia are not just victims of this war – we are frontline defenders of our peoples, cultures, and lands. The international community must recognize our struggles, amplify our voices, and support our right to self-determination. Decolonization is not just a theoretical concept; it is a necessary process for justice and long-lasting peace.

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Strengthening the Oxfam Confederation: Historic Decisions on Affiliation in the Philippines, Kenya and Senegal

    Source: Oxfam –

    The Oxfam Confederation has taken a major step forward on its journey to becoming more diverse, inclusive, and locally led. 

    At the March 2025 Affiliate Business Meeting (ABM), all Oxfam Affiliates unanimously approved three significant affiliation decisions:

    • Oxfam Pilipinas has become a Full Affiliate of the Confederation.
    • Oxfam Kenya and Oxfam Senegal have been confirmed as Prospective Affiliates.

    These decisions mark a historic moment, not just in structural terms, but as an expression of Oxfam’s feminist and decolonial commitments, and our shared ambition to shift power and centre leadership in the Global South. In 2020, Oxfam committed to becoming a peer-based Affiliate Network by 2030, with parity between northern and southern Affiliates. Affiliation journeys – from an exploration phase to Prospective Affiliate status and then Full Affiliate status – are central to this transformation.

    Oxfam Pilipinas

    Oxfam Pilipinas has transitioned from an existing Country Program into an independent national organisation, becoming a Full Affiliate after a robust process of transformation. This builds on over 35 years of presence in the country and deep partnerships with movements for social, gender, and climate justice. With a strong feminist and rights-based identity, Oxfam Pilipinas leads with a vision of Patas na Bukas: The Future is Equal – advancing humanitarian leadership, resilient governance, and the power of grassroots activism.

    Oxfam Kenya and Oxfam Senegal are newly established national organisations that build on the legacy of longstanding Oxfam Country Programs. They are led by Boards committed to building dependable, resilient and influential national affiliates.

    Oxfam Kenya

    Oxfam Kenya brings over 60 years of experience in humanitarian response, influencing, and development, underpinned by feminist and decolonial approaches. Its strategy is rooted in accountable governance, gender justice, and systems change, with a strong emphasis on localised leadership and innovation. 

    Oxfam Senegal

    Oxfam Senegal, drawing from over four decades of work in the country, is building a bold, citizen-led organisation focused on dismantling systemic inequalities and driving just climate and governance solutions across Francophone and Sahelian contexts. Its approach is grounded in intersectionality, equity, and strong regional alliances.

    Their Prospective Affiliate status reflects the Confederation’s confidence in their leadership, governance, and strategic clarity, and opens a transition phase during which they will deepen their operational and institutional capacities while playing an active role in confederation life. 

    What This Means for the Confederation and Our Work

    These decisions strengthen Oxfam’s ability to act as a network of peers that is truly shaped by the people and places we serve. They are a testament to the leadership, vision, and resilience of our colleagues in the Philippines, Kenya and Senegal, and to the collaborative efforts across the Confederation that support these transitions.

    We are celebrating this historic moment as we recommit ourselves to become a bolder, more globally balanced, and more just Oxfam.

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Oxfam reaction to OECD preliminary data on aid spending in 2024

    Source: Oxfam –

    In response to the publication today of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development’s (OECD) preliminary data on Official Development Assistance (ODA) for 2024, Oxfam International’s Aid Policy Lead Salvatore Nocerino said:

    “Today’s figures lay bare an ugly truth: even before this year’s devastating cuts to aid, rich countries had already begun to renege on their moral obligations to the world’s most vulnerable communities. Not only had they been reducing aid, but also spending a significant share of it within their own borders to cover refugee costs.

    “Only a handful of countries, including Luxembourg, New Zealand, Spain and South Korea, maintained or increased their aid budgets in 2024, and are expected to do the same this year.

    “If governments keep slashing aid, more children will go to bed hungry, more people will die from diseases we’ve long known how to prevent, and millions more will be pushed even deeper into poverty.

    “Governments must urgently reverse these cuts and start taxing the super-rich, whose wealth has grown unchecked. In a world as interconnected as ours, diseases and climate disasters know no borders. These cuts are reckless and short-sighted, and will drive us all towards greater harm.”
     

    The OECD’s preliminary data shows that ODA totalled $212 billion in 2024, a significant drop from $223 billion in 2023. Last year’s ODA fell $237 billion short of meeting the longstanding commitment of allocating 0.7 percent of gross national income (GNI) to aid for low- and middle-income countries. Oxfam has calculated that in the 54 years since this promise was made, rich countries have failed to deliver a total of $7.5 trillion in aid.

    In 2024, 13.1 percent was spent on domestic refugee reception.

    According to Forbes’ 39th Annual World’s Billionaire List published on 1 April, billionaires are worth a record $16.1 trillion, $2 trillion more than in 2024.
     

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: “Let us do our jobs” — Major aid groups in Gaza warn aid system is collapsing

    Source: Oxfam –

    After 18 months of war, a staggering toll on civilians and aid workers, and now a six-week total siege, the humanitarian aid system in Gaza is facing total collapse with the CEOs of 12 major aid organisations making an urgent plea: let us do our jobs. 

    A new humanitarian access survey of 43 international and Palestinian aid organisations working in Gaza found nearly all of them – 95% – have had to suspend or dramatically cut services since the ceasefire ended one month ago on 18 March, with widespread and indiscriminate bombing making it extremely dangerous to move around.

    The people of Gaza – particularly women and children – are paying the price. Families are living amongst the rubble of their destroyed homes.  Famine is not just a risk, but likely rapidly unfolding in almost all parts of Gaza. The UN has warned the humanitarian crisis in Gaza is the worst it has been in 18 months.

    Stripped of the means to keep people alive, hospitals have become morgues. More than 51,000 Palestinians have been reported killed. One of the last partially functioning hospitals, Al-Ahli Arab Hospital in northern Gaza, was bombed last Sunday.  

    “This is one of the worst humanitarian failures of our generation. Every single person in Gaza is relying on humanitarian aid to survive. That lifeline has been completely cut off since a blockade on all aid supplies was imposed by Israeli authorities on 2 March.  

    “We have supplies ready. We have trained medical staff. We have the expertise. What we don’t have is the access – or the guarantee by Israeli authorities that our teams can safely do their jobs.  

    “Survival itself is now slipping out of reach and the humanitarian system is at breaking point,” the CEOs of the 12 aid organisations said in their joint statement.  

    Twenty-four of the surveyed organisations reported increased movement restrictions in Gaza, impeding their ability to deliver aid.  Nineteen aid organisations reported having cargo stuck outside Gaza, totaling at least 9,000 pallets of aid supplies.  

    Gaza now holds the disastrous record of being the deadliest place on earth for humanitarian workers. We cannot operate under fire or stay silent while our staff are killed. 

    More than 400 aid workers and over 1,300 health workers have been reported killed in Gaza since October 2023, despite the requirement under international humanitarian law for humanitarian workers to be protected.  

    The recent killing of 15 Palestinian paramedics and rescue workers, whose bodies were found buried in a mass grave triggered global outrage, but many violations and attacks go unreported. 

    Despite hopes that the eight-week pause in hostilities would become a turning point, the violence against civilians and aid workers has only worsened. Since Israeli forces resumed bombardments, at least 14 organisations reported Israeli fire directly or indirectly hitting their staff or aid facilities.  

    Every day, aid workers – the majority of whom are Palestinian – are targeted, detained, obstructed or killed. Just as every day, rules meant to protect civilians in war are ignored with impunity.  When our staff and partners, our convoys, our offices, our warehouses are shelled, the message is loud and clear: even lifesaving aid is no longer protected. 

    This is unacceptable. 

    Meanwhile, Israeli authorities have proposed a new authorisation mechanism for the delivery of aid in Gaza that the UN Secretary-General has described as “limiting aid down to the last calorie and grain of flour.” This mechanism would set a dangerous new global precedent and eliminate any remaining space to deliver aid independent of military and political motivations. New NGO visa and registration rules, based on vague criteria, will censor humanitarian reporting and prevent us from fulfilling our mandate. 

    We call on all parties to guarantee the safety of our staff and to allow the safe, unfettered access of aid into and across Gaza through all entry points, and for world leaders to oppose further restrictions. 

    We call for the protection of civilians and civilian infrastructure including hospitals, schools and shelters and the immediate restoration of basic services – water, electricity, and sanitation as required under international law. 

    We call for the release of the hostages. 

    We call for the release of all Palestinians arbitrarily detained. 

    We call, yet again, resoundingly, for an immediate and permanent ceasefire. 

    Humanitarian aid must never be used as a political tool. Saving lives should not be controversial. Laws of war developed over centuries to govern conduct and protect civilians should not now be discarded. 

    Let us do our jobs.  

    INGER ASHING, CEO, Save the Children International 

    AMITABH BEHAR, Executive Director, Oxfam International 

    SEAN CARROLL, President and CEO, Anera

    STEVE CUTTS, interim Chief Executive Officer, Medical Aid for Palestinians (MAP)  

    NICOLAS DOTTA, CEO, Médecins du Monde Spain

    JAN EGELAND, Secretary General, Norwegian Refugee Council (NRC) 

    REENA GHELANI, CEO, Plan International

    MANUEL PATROUILLARD, Managing Director, Humanity & Inclusion – Handicap International  

    MORGANE ROUSSEAU, CEO, Médecins du Monde Switzerland

    REINTJE VAN HAERINGEN, Chair – Executive Committee, CARE International 

    JOEL WEILER, CEO, Médecins du Monde France

    ROB WILLIAMS, CEO, War Child Alliance

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Aid workers describe Gaza as “stuff of nightmares” as Israel’s mass forced displacements cause carnage and despair

    Source: Oxfam –

    Restrictions on movement and total siege making aid operations almost impossible – Oxfam 

    As Gaza enters the eighth week of an Israel-imposed siege, blocking aid, vital supplies and commercial goods, Oxfam staff are describing conditions as the “stuff of nightmares”, with Israel’s mass forced displacement orders spreading terror, Oxfam said.  

    Israel has issued repeated forced displacement orders to clear out civilian populations from its renewed airstrikes and attacks on Gaza since 18 March, which has left about 70% of the Strip under displacement orders or “no go” zones, affecting more than 500,000 people. Many have been pushed into inhospitable, unsafe and inaccessible areas.  

    Since 2 March, Israel has allowed no aid or commercial goods to enter Gaza. Many humanitarian agencies have been forced to pause their operations. Oxfam and its partners have not received a single aid truck, food parcel, hygiene kit or any other essential equipment since the siege began. Oxfam’s supplies are nearly exhausted, with only a few water tanks remaining in Gaza City. 

    Palestinians in Gaza are now emotionally and physically exhausted after 18 months of airstrikes and ground offensives, repeated forced displacement orders and restrictions on basic services since October 7, 2023. 

    “It’s hard to explain just how terrible things are in Gaza at the moment. Our staff and partners are witnessing scenes of carnage and despair every day. People are in terror, fearing for their lives as displacement orders tell them, with little notice, to move with whatever they can carry.”

    Clemence Lagouardat, Oxfam Response Lead in Gaza

    Oxfam International

    The recent escalations in efforts by Israel to bombard, deprive and displace the Palestinian population of Gaza, sees Oxfam and partner organizations severely restricted and struggling to provide support to civilians, who are facing starvation and relentless violence.  

    One Oxfam staff member, who was displaced under fire twice in one week after the forced evacuation of Rafah, said nearly everything had been destroyed. She described the sounds of gunfire at night and people crying in the street, not knowing where to go. Another Oxfam worker said the experiences were “the stuff of nightmares” – people crying for help under piles of rubble, with others desperately trying to flee with injured family members, and others facing a daily struggle to find anything to drink or eat.  

    Clemence Lagouardat, Oxfam Response Lead in Gaza said:  

    “It’s hard to explain just how terrible things are in Gaza at the moment. Our staff and partners are witnessing scenes of carnage and despair every day. People are in terror, fearing for their lives as displacement orders tell them, with little notice, to move with whatever they can carry. 

    “The restrictions on internal movement are also making it very difficult to carry out vital, life-saving work. With so many people displaced, the strains on dwindling resources and operational needs are massive. What little aid we have left inside Gaza is hard to get to people living in makeshift shelters and tents when travel is so dangerous.” 

    Mohammad Nairab, Executive Manager, Palestinian Environmental Friends Association (PEF), one of Oxfam’s partners in Gaza said: 

    “Since the war resumed many of our teams have been displaced. We have had to continue our work despite the lack of safety, as countless people rely on us for water, especially during these dire times. Nothing could have prepared us for such an unprecedented war. The damage we face—both psychological and physical—is profound and cannot be undone.” 

    Oxfam says that people are struggling to find safe drinking water, with facilities bombed or unable to operate since Israel cut the last remaining electricity supplies needed to run sanitation facilities. Backup generators are of little use because fuel stores are depleted. The prices of what little food is available have skyrocketed, and many people are at risk of extreme hunger.  

    Lagouardat said: “We must see an end to this terror and carnage right now, with a lifting of the siege to allow urgent humanitarian aid to reach all of those in need.”  

    Oxfam is calling for a renewed and permanent ceasefire, the safe return of Israeli hostages and illegally detained Palestinian prisoners, and immediate and unfettered aid access at scale in Gaza. Oxfam reiterates its call for justice and accountability for all those affected. States should stop selling arms to Israel, risking complicity in war crimes and crimes against humanity.      

    //Ends 

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Todos, todos, todos

    Source: Greenpeace Statement –

    He’ll come back again, I muttered as I declined a friend’s invitation to see Pope Francis when he visited the University of Sto. Tomas in 2015. There was good reason to believe he would. Being one of two predominantly Catholic countries in Asia, the Philippines would certainly be a prime place for a liberal-leaning pope to visit. That confidence was also masked by a certain hubris that I might find myself in Rome one of these days, looking up at St. Peter’s Square. So his sudden death brings more regrets than questions; a certainty that I missed the mark and did not see Christ’s representative in the flesh.

    Having been raised Catholic, the life of the Church was always like a familiar plaza. There was as much friendship as there was gossip, and it was a place to cultivate not only one’s faith but also the sense of community that is so important with the Church. In a sense, I was also brought up in the more traditional track of Catholicism, and this was also reflected in my theological interests during graduate studies. Looking back, it seemed all the more strange that I would refuse an opportunity to see the Pope. Perhaps there was something stirring inside me, a subconscious feeling that made it difficult for me to embrace the Church.

    Francis, in many ways, represented a perceived break—a moment of irruption in the unified vision of the Church. One could remember the fear in his eyes when he was presented to the world for the first time in strikingly simple garb. There was something uncanny about him when he was addressing the crowd. Why couldn’t I shake off the feeling of discomfort? Being Jesuit-educated, I should understand this simplicity, but for some reason, there was what Karl Rahner called “the unsolved remainder” that lingered long after the pomp and excitement of Francis’s election.

    And it became more and more apparent as Francis slowly broke down what I thought was the Church, often in gentle ways. From admitting—to a Haiyan survivor—the failure of human reason amidst unspeakable suffering, to kissing the feet of inmates in Regina Coeli prison in Rome every Maundy Thursday, Francis’s brand of Church-building was one of humility.

    The Franciscan brand of humility was never far away from radical unity. In order for the Church to be truly itself, she had to go back to her roots, a Church that called for the liberation of the oppressed, that swung open the doors of secrecy, that loved everyone—todos, todos, todos—regardless of orientation, belief, background, or status. The roots of the Church, Francis pressed, had to go where there was a real chance it would not grow and then eventually rot away. The fringes and the frontlines where God seemingly has abandoned humanity: among the wastelands of war, famine, and communities flattened by extreme weather, and even in the most personal and intimate encounters of the deafening silence of God.

    Perhaps it was the reaching out to the margins that terrified me, because spiritually, I’ve found myself in those dark corners especially in the last few years. Perhaps I felt seen and heard, and I did not want to be because I refused to admit that all I heard was silence. Because such is the nature of the dark night–it creeps up silently, etching away the facade of one’s faith. It then becomes like an irresistible itch that one unconsciously scratches, preventing any kind of healing. Paradoxically, it is only ever in this kind of darkness and silence that the God of Francis’s teaching fully reveals His power, the power of pure presence, and this presence had a name: mercy.

    That was probably the unsolved remainder: a God that offered no world-changing reason for the problems of humanity, no quick fixes to the climate crisis, no easy answers to the suffering of the innocent. A God that simply announces Himself as Herself in the midst of the world’s brokenness, with the complete honesty that nothing will ever fully address the weight of suffering. Francis represented that simple, honest, and all-embracing mercy, and that disturbed me, because little did I know that I was the one being ministered to.

    Perhaps that was what Francis really tried to teach: to be able to have the confidence to confront even the darkest questions, mustering up the courage to face the world’s problems with nothing more than the quiet assurance that God will never leave. This conviction probably annoyed me because it was easier said than done. It probably angered me too as it didn’t offer the kind of solutions our world has been accustomed to.

    The urgency is much more pressing in a world that is slowly crumbling away from the excesses of the rich and powerful, who continue to prioritize greed and self-interest over the life of the planet, and who foment hate towards those that are not like them. Could you believe that? The “answer” to all these overwhelming problems was to be silent and sit by someone and cry with them?

    Maybe it was less of an answer and more of a signpost towards a starting point. That, to meet and commune with those who have suffered, what was required was to refrain from immediately offering solutions and open oneself up to the simple power of presence. In many ways it is also a slap on my face: working in an environmental NGO, one gets lost in the urgency of the calls, for instance, to make polluters pay, and one forgets the truly essential starting point of mercy. One gets addicted to the thrill of campaigning, and one neglects the unsolved remainder that will always result from the calculus of the climate crisis. Perhaps the starting point in addressing the climate crisis is on the level of fear and trembling with others, where words fail and presence remains the only acceptable response. Much like the silence that envelops a household swept away by a storm surge, and no amount of campaigning will ever repay or repair what was lost. Campaigning involving human suffering always entails acquiescing to the silence of presence, and only then can one build truly merciful and human connections and tackle the climate crisis together with others.

    It took Francis’s death to make me realize that I was being ministered to spiritually and in work, and there is no timeline for when the darkness will be lifted. Now the plaza is less bustling and, at times, flooded. And the floating garbage is like the lingering memories of the moments I wasted neglecting my own faith and conviction for my work. But when I look up, all I see are the forgotten that Francis invited back into the Church, and I realize my own brokenness and darkness too, as I am constantly being invited back to the Church that is equally broken.

    Maybe this is what it means to be a Church now: to acknowledge our brokenness and how we have become used to or even addicted to it. To use this as a starting point to see each other as each other and cultivate the kind of courageous presence that breaks down the powerful. Until everyone, everyone, and everyone is embraced without measure.

    You might want to check out Greenpeace Philippines’ petition called Courage for Climate, a drive in support of real policy and legal solutions in the pursuit of climate justice.

    Courage for Climate

    The climate crisis may seem hopeless, but now is the time for courage, not despair. Join Filipino communities taking bold action for our planet.

    Make an Act of Courage Today!


    Jefferson Chua is a Greenpeace Campaigner working on climate, based in the Philippines.

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Tunisia: Mass convictions of opposition activists after sham trial marks a dangerous moment

    Source: Amnesty International –

    The sentencing on 19 April of 40 individuals, including prominent political opposition figures, lawyers, and human rights defenders, to harsh prison terms ranging between 13 and 66 years after being convicted of trumped-up charges by the Tunis Court of First Instance is an alarming sign of the extent to which the authorities will go in their clampdown on peaceful dissent in the country.  

    “The verdict is a travesty of justice and illustrates the authorities’ complete disregard for Tunisia’s international human rights obligations and the rule of law,” said Erika Guevara Rosas, Senior Director for Research, Policy, Advocacy and Campaigns at Amnesty International said: 

    “These individuals have been convicted solely for the peaceful exercise of their human rights. Their trial has been riddled with procedural violations and a blatant disregard of minimum defense rights and was based on unsubstantiated charges.    

    Instead of silencing critics with politically motivated prosecutions, the authorities should immediately and unconditionally release all those detained solely for peacefully exercising their human rights. Tunisia’s authorities should immediately quash the unjust convictions and sentences. 

    “No one should be punished for the peaceful exercise of their human rights.” 

    Among the 40 individuals targeted in this trial, six opposition political figures – Jaouhar Ben Mbarek, Khayyam Turki, Issam Chebbi, Ghazi Chaouachi, Ridha Belhaj, and Abdelhamid Jelassi – have been in arbitrary detention since the investigation started in February 2023. 

    The rest of the defendants have also been sentenced, including several individuals who had been placed in were in detention in relation to other politically motivated cases — such as senior opposition figures Noureddine Bhiri, Sahbi Atig, and Said Ferjani from the former ruling Ennahdha party. Others, like Riadh Chaibi and Ahmed Nejib Chebbi remain free but were convicted in absentia. The case also targets prominent human rights defenders Kamel Jendoubi, Ayachi Hammami, and Bochra Bel Haj Hmida, as well as businessmen and private media shareholders.  

    “The deterioration of judicial independence in Tunisia is deeply concerning and the executive authorities’ increasing abuse of the justice system and interference in the administration of justice fundamentally undermines the fair trial rights of defendants and the rule of law,” said Erika Guevara Rosas. 

    “It is crucial that the Tunisian authorities uphold their international human rights obligations, including the rights to freedom of expression and association.  They must cease the targeting of political opponents, human rights defenders, and critics.” 

    The harsh sentences handed down at dawn on 19 April ranged between 13 and 66 years in prison, according to the first deputy public prosecutor at the anti-terrorism judicial unit. 

    The trial, which has been marred by procedural flaws, a lack of due process, saw its first session on 4 March 2025 without detainees present and has been adjourned to 11 April then 18 April. The Bar Association had previously received notification from the court that terrorism trials in March and April would proceed with detainees attending online from prison, vaguely citing the existence of a “real danger”. This decision was challenged by the detainees and their defense team, who argued for their right to be present in court. The detainees declared their refusal to participate in the trial online and insisted on being physically present.  

    On 30 March 2025, Jaouhar Ben Mbarek started a hunger strike to protest the online hearings of the trial.  On 8 April 2025, the five remaining detainees also announced a hunger strike  for similar reasons. Senior Ennahdha official Said Ferjani, sentenced to 13 years in prison in February 2025 in a separate case, began a hunger strike on 10 April to protest against the “biased and non-neutral judicial treatment” of this case.  

    During the initial hearing, the court inaccurately stated that the detainees had refused to participate in the trial, omitting to mention their demand to be brought physically before the court. Lawyers present contested this, clarifying that their clients had only refused to participate remotely. Requests to postpone the trial until the detainees could be physically present and arguments highlighting the arbitrariness of their prolonged detention – exceeding the legal limit of 14 months under Tunisian law – were ignored by the court, which adjourned the session and later announced the trial would resume on 11 April without addressing these concerns. 

    During the court hearing on 11 April, some journalists from Tunisian and foreign media were prevented from accessing the court room.  The National Union of Tunisian Journalists (SNJT) denounced the authorities actions. Some observers from civil society groups, including Amnesty International in Tunisia were also banned from entering the court room.  

    The investigation against the detainees has relied on questionable evidence, including phone messages discussing meetings with diplomats and other foreign nationals, as well as internal communications regarding the possibility of peaceful opposition to what they termed President Saied’s “coup.” 

    Background:  

    Between 11 and 25 February 2023, the “counterterrorism” police brigade arrested the six named political opposition figures based on spurious charges under the Tunisian Penal Code and the 2015-26 “counterterrorism” Law, including “conspiracy against state security” and attempting to “change the nature of the State,” charges that can carry the death penalty. Two other prominent opposition figures, Lazhar Akremi and Chaima Issa, were also arrested in February 2023 before being released on bail with restrictive conditions in July 2023 after six months of arbitrary detention. 

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Military courts: The front line of Uganda’s war on dissent

    Source: Amnesty International –

    Used to prosecuting civilians, Uganda’s military courts help entrench repression ahead of the 2026 elections.

    Uganda is gearing up for general elections in January 2026 – the seventh since President Yoweri Museveni came to power in 1986. As in the lead-up to previous polls, repression is on the rise. This time, however, it has extended beyond Uganda’s own borders.

    On November 16, 2024, opposition politician Kizza Besigye and his aide Obeid Lutale were abducted in Nairobi, Kenya. Four days later, they resurfaced in Uganda’s capital Kampala arraigned in a military court on security charges. Rendered to Uganda, in clear violation of international laws prohibiting extraordinary rendition and due process, the two civilians faced military justice.

    Outraged by this militarisation of justice, Besigye and Lutale attracted a 40-strong defence team led by Martha Karua, Kenya’s former minister of justice.

    If the state antics were intended to silence dissenting voices, they have done just the opposite. Far from dissuading others from speaking up, these trials have sparked a national conversation on human rights and the role of the military.

    Uganda’s Chief of Defence Forces (CDF), General Muhoozi Kainerugaba, Museveni’s son, has regularly commented on Besigye’s case on X. Widely seen as a potential successor to his ageing father, Kainerugaba heads a political pressure group, the Patriotic League of Uganda (PLU), despite legislation currently prohibiting serving military officers from involvement in partisan politics.

    If the state antics were intended to silence dissenting voices, they have done just the opposite. Far from dissuading others from speaking up, these trials have sparked a national conversation on human rights and the role of the military.

    Tigere Chagutah, Amnesty International’s Regional Director for East and Southern Africa

    Since 2016, Uganda’s Supreme Court had delayed ruling on a case, brought by Michael Kabaziguruka, a former member of parliament, challenging the trial of civilians before military courts. Kabaziguruka, who was accused of treason, argued that his trial in a military tribunal violated fair trial rights. As a civilian, he contended he was not subject to military law. Besigye and Lutale’s case gave renewed impetus to this.

    On January 31, 2025, the Supreme Court ruled that trying civilians in military courts is unconstitutional, ordering that all ongoing or pending criminal trials involving civilians must immediately stop and be transferred to ordinary courts.

    Despite this ruling, President Museveni and his son have vowed to continue using military courts in civilian trials. Besigye went on hunger strike for 10 days in protest against delays in transferring his case to an ordinary court. The case has now become a litmus test for Uganda’s military justice system ahead of the 2026 elections.

    Besigye and Lutale are not the only opposition politicians to face military justice. Tens of supporters of the National Unity Platform (NUP), led by Robert Kyagulanyi, popularly known as Bobi Wine, have been convicted by military courts for various offences. These include wearing NUP’s trademark red berets and other party attire that authorities claimed resembled military uniforms, despite their distinct differences. Numerous lesser-known political activists are facing charges in military courts, too.

    Over 1,000 civilians have been prosecuted in Uganda’s military courts since 2002 for offences such as murder and armed robbery.

    Military trials of civilians flout international and regional standards. They open possibilities of a flurry of human rights violations, including coerced confessions, opaque processes, unfair trials and executions.

    Tigere Chagutah

    For context, in 2005, the state amended the UPDF Act to create a legal framework which allowed the military to try civilians in military courts. It was no coincidence that these amendments happened as the military was trying civilians arrested between 2001 and 2004, including Kizza Besigye.

    Military trials of civilians flout international and regional standards. They open possibilities of a flurry of human rights violations, including coerced confessions, opaque processes, unfair trials and executions.

    Trying civilians in military courts violates Article 7 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights and the 2001 Principles and Guidelines on Fair Trial and Legal Assistance in Africa. The African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights, the region’s premier human rights body, has long condemned their practice in Uganda.

    Opposition to military justice has not just come from the usual quarters. Religious leaders expressed concern about Besigye’s continued detention after the Supreme Court ruling, as did Anita Among, speaker of Uganda’s Parliament and member of the ruling National Resistance Movement (NRM), who remarked: “Injustice to anyone is injustice to everybody. Today it is happening to Dr Besigye, tomorrow it will happen to any one of us”.

    Following the court order and widespread outcry, Besigye and Lutale were transferred to a civilian court on February 21. Besigye called off his hunger strike. They remain in detention, as does their lawyer. However, their transfer without release, in a process begun by an illegality, remains flawed. Despite the transfer of their case, scores of more civilians have their cases still pending before military courts, with little hope that they will be transferred to civilian courts.

    For this reason, 11 groups including Amnesty Kenya, the Pan-African Lawyers Union, the Law Society of Kenya, the Kenya Human Rights Commission and Kenya Medical Practitioners, Pharmacists, and Dentists Union (KMPDU) call for their immediate release.

    As Uganda approaches elections, it is evident that the military courts are now a tool in President Museveni’s shed for use to silence dissent. It is time for Uganda to heed the Supreme Court ruling – for now though, military justice is on trial, too.

    The oped first ran on Al Jazeera


    Tigere Chagutah
    is Amnesty International’s Regional Director for East and Southern Africa

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Russia: Activist Daria Kozyreva conviction for poetic anti-war protest exposes continued repression

    Source: Amnesty International –

    Reacting to the conviction of 19-year-old anti-war activist Daria Kozyreva for “repeated discreditation of the Russian armed forces,” Natalia Zviagina, Amnesty International’s Russia Director, said:

    “Today’s verdict is another chilling reminder of how far the Russian authorities will go to silence peaceful opposition to their war in Ukraine.”

    “Daria Kozyreva is being punished for quoting a classic of 19th-century Ukrainian poetry, for speaking out against an unjust war and for refusing to stay silent. We demand the immediate and unconditional release of Daria Kozyreva and everyone imprisoned under ‘war censorship laws’.”

    Background

    On 18 April, the Petrogradsky District Court of St. Petersburg sentenced Daria Kozyreva, a former medical student, to two years and eight months in a penal colony under the draconian law on “discreditation of the armed forces” (Article 280.3 of the Criminal Code). She was convicted for peaceful acts of dissent: posting a blog entry criticizing Russia’s war in Ukraine; giving an interview to a RFE/RL media project; and affixing a quote from the poem “Testament” by renowned Ukrainian poet Taras Shevchenko to his monument in St. Petersburg. The quote read: “Oh bury me, then rise ye up / And break your heavy chains / And water with the tyrants’ blood / The freedom you have gained”.

    Daria Kozyreva spent nearly a year in pre-trial detention and was subjected to forced psychiatric evaluation. On 7 February 2025, she was released from pre-trial detention, as she had been held for the maximum time allowed. Her freedom remained restricted: she was under curfew and prohibited from using her phone or the Internet and from talking to the media.

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Offshore detention is inhumane — I know because I lived it

    Source: Amnesty International –

    On my first day in offshore detention, I was given a number. Benham Satah became FRT009 — or Foxtrot Romeo Tango Zero Zero Nine, as the guards would use the military alphabet. It was one of the many ways they treated us like criminals or prisoners of war.

    When I fled Iran in 2013, I never imagined I would end up on Manus Island in Papua New Guinea. I risked my life to get from Indonesia to Christmas Island, an Australian territory in the Indian Ocean. When you need to flee, you grab the first opportunity you get — and this boat was mine.

    Europe’s nations have proposed establishing refugee ‘return hubs’ in third-party countries outside their jurisdiction for failed asylum seekers. But they should think twice.

    After four days at sea, we finally saw dry land. But my relief turned to horror as the guards were already there, waiting to detain us. And after 25 days in detention there, we were then handcuffed, dragged on to a plane by four giant security guards. They wouldn’t tell us where we were heading.

    It felt like we were being kidnapped.

    When we finally arrived in Papua New Guinea, they took us to the Lombrum military compound, where we were detained in 3-square-meter rooms, each with a bunk bed and a third camp bed. There was just enough space to lie down.

    Then, I was transferred to my final destination of Manus Island — the detention camp for men only. We were over 500 in a facility that was built for 200. There were LGBTQ+ individuals, unaccompanied children, vulnerable people left alone with no real protection to survive in a dangerous environment.

    It was so hot in the camp. The only reprieve came in the evenings, when the temperature would drop slightly. And even though we were surrounded by the ocean, with the camp just meters from the shore, I never actually heard the lapping of waves — the generator clattered like a helicopter day and night, drowning out the sea.

    It smelled so bad there. The Australian caseworkers admitted they wouldn’t even bring an animal to the camp. There were 10 toilets and 10 showers for 500 people, and this caused problems every day. The rubbish was left to sweat and ferment in the tropical heat. They would set off smoke bombs to kill mosquitos. The whole camp stank of chemicals. Despite this, all these years later, I still have malaria in my blood.

    There were 14 deaths recorded in the years I was on Manus Island. I still see their faces — especially my roommate’s, Reza Barati. He was murdered before my eyes, while in the custody of the Australian government. [According to eyewitness reports, Barati was beaten to death by guards and other contractors.]

    People died of preventable deaths there. Everyone suffered from mental or physical health problems. The only treatment we received was paracetamol and water. I remember Hamid (whose name has been changed to protect his identity). He never received proper treatment, as there was no doctor in the medical center here. They amputated both his legs in the capital, Port Moresby. He died from septicemia.

    But we weren’t just denied treatment on Manus, those in charge were also inexplicably reckless with vaccinations. I was an interpreter for a friend, FRT001, who came on the same boat as me. I witnessed him receive 60 vaccines in under a month. We tried to stop them, but if you refused a vaccine, they would call the Emergency Response Team.

    My friend was eventually sent back to Iran where he died not long after.

    Ukrainian refugees are protected by the French government — every refugee should be treated that way.

    People would self-immolate with petrol in detention. We were beaten. At times the violence was extreme, and you could be assaulted for no reason. When a packet of cigarettes can guarantee your safety, you understand how cheap human life can be.

    With offshore detention, the Australian government paid Nauru and Papua New Guinea to do its dirty work. There was no law there, and they could do what they wanted without fear of the courts. We were denied access to lawyers. We were out of sight, out of mind — exactly as was intended. 

    I tried to take my life several times on Manus, and the memories still give me nightmares. I lost almost seven years of my youth in detention. Those are days I will never get back. I still take a lot of tablets just to get through the day.

    Everyone I know who went through this “offshore detention” scheme has since been diagnosed with PTSD. I think we need a new term for what we experienced, like Manus disease or offshore detention syndrome. Even people who just spent a month there are still suffering.

    Not knowing when you’ll leave — it’s worse than any prison sentence. It destroys your mental health.

    Nowadays, I work with the Salvation Army, and volunteer to help Ukrainians in France who fled Russia’s invasion. Ukrainian refugees are protected by the French government — every refugee should be treated that way. They should be given a chance to live and build a future. I also provide support and counseling for people on Manus Island and those who left but are still suffering.

    I still have my own struggles with depression and mental health, but helping others in my situation lifts me up.

    It was torture what the government did to us. They were saying it was deterrence, but it never worked. It hasn’t stopped people from trying to get to Australia to seek protection because they have no choice. Instead, it has become a stain on Australian history.

    I hope no European country ever adopts this policy.

    Benham Satah coordinated this piece with Amnesty International.

    This piece was first published by Politico here

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Desperate situation for people fleeing Zamzam camp in Sudan

    Source: Médecins Sans Frontières –

    Following the Rapid Support Forces’ (RSF) large-scale ground offensive on Zamzam camp that started on 11 April, hundreds of thousands of people have joined the communities already besieged and deprived of lifesaving aid in El Fasher, the neighbouring capital city of North Darfur, Sudan. 25,000 more people reached Tawila, further west, where overwhelmed Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) teams are currently expanding activities to cope with the most pressing medical needs.

    We are making an urgent appeal to put an end to the siege and the atrocities, to deliver humanitarian aid, including by airdropping food and medicines to El Fasher if necessary, and to allow those who wish to flee to do so safely.

    The RSF and their allied armed groups stormed Zamzam, Sudan’s largest displacement camp, which used to host at least 500,000 people near El Fasher, after months of an increasingly tight siege on the area. By 16 April, the camp, by then largely destroyed, was reportedly under RSF control. The majority of people living in Zamzam are believed to have fled to El Fasher, where they remain trapped, out of reach of humanitarian aid and exposed to ongoing attacks and further mass violence. 

    While MSF teams in Tawila saw over 25,000 people arriving from Zamzam and nearby areas between 12 and 15 April, displaced people are now arriving more sporadically and at great risk for their lives along the way. Our teams set up a health post at the entrance of Tawila to provide the new arrivals with water and immediate nutritional and medical support. We refer critical cases to the local hospital where we have been working since last October. About 1,600 patients so far have required emergency outpatient services, mainly because of severe dehydration.

    “We are treating children who were literally dying of thirst on their journeys. We have received so far over 170 people with gunshot and blast injuries and 40 per cent of them are women and girls,” says Marion Ramstein, MSF project coordinator in Tawila. “People tell us that many injured and vulnerable people could not make the trip to Tawila and were left behind. Almost everyone we talk to said they lost at least one family member during the attack.”

    Horrific reports emerge from Zamzam camp, where hundreds of people are estimated to have been killed. Fighters were said to be going door-to-door, shooting people hiding in their homes and burning large parts of the camp. Casualties include eleven staff from the humanitarian organisation Relief International, which was running the only remaining clinic in the camp after MSF suspended all its activities in Zamzam in February due to escalating violence and blockades. 

    We urge the RSF and all armed groups in the area to spare and protect civilians and ensure that those who want to flee can do so without further harm. States and diplomatic actors must use their leverage to translate hollow statements into concrete actions. There have been repeated warnings from the UN and many observers about the risks of mass killings and ethnic violence in El Fasher and the surroundings displacement camps, mostly inhabited by people from the non-Arab Zaghawa and Fur ethnic groups, while most of the RSF fighters and their allies originate from Arab tribes.

    After two years of a catastrophic war on people met by neglectful indifference, it remains inconceivable to simply resign ourselves to the current collective failure to provide vital assistance where it’s most needed.

    “A massive humanitarian response is needed, now more urgently than ever. If the roads to El Fasher are blocked, then air operations must be launched to bring food and medicines to the estimated one million people trapped there and being starved,” Rasmane Kabore, MSF head of mission in Sudan. “A scaled-up response is also needed in Tawila, where some of the survivors are being received and local capacities are overwhelmed.”

    MSF and several other actors are launching emergency interventions in Tawila, but much more is needed in terms of water, food, medical care and shelter. 

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Inside the hack-for-hire scandal: ongoing saga to uncover potential Exxon-linked cyberattacks intended to derail climate accountability

    Source: Greenpeace Statement –

    Reports of a major hack-for-hire scheme began to appear after the 2019 indictment of an Israeli private investigator, Aviram Azari, and the groundbreaking 2020 research by Citizen Lab into hacking-for-hire groups. Both Azari’s indictment and Citizen Lab’s report found that individuals and groups had been targeted by hackers, allegedly under the direction of private investigators that were working with powerful clients. 

    These clients appear to include DCI Group (DCI), a public relations and lobbying firm based in Washington D.C. One of DCI’s clients at the time the hacking allegedly occurred was ExxonMobil Corporation (Exxon), according to multiple news outlets’ analysis of court documents revealed this January and a source contacted by Reuters. During the same period that hacking occurred, the victims of the hacking appear to have been involved with the #ExxonKnew campaign and associated climate accountability litigation. The hack targets indicate a potential motive to derail momentum behind these lawsuits and #ExxonKnew campaigns, which accused ExxonMobil of knowing about and deliberately hiding or miscommunicating about climate change and the impacts of the industry. 

    Since the investigation of Azari, another private investigator, Amit Forlit, has recently been indicted and appears to be connected to the same hacking scheme involving Exxon based on court documents for both investigators and their business connections with each other at the time hacking occurred. To what extent Azari and Forlit worked together is not yet known, but court documents have suggested they are business associates. The news of Forlit’s involvement became public when the U.S. Department of Justice filed a request for Forlit to be extradited from the U.K. in 2024. DCI and Exxon were not named in the U.S. request to extradite Forlit for alleged hacking involvement, but Forlit’s lawyer mentioned both companies in his defense.

    A Greenpeace banner flies over the skyline of Dallas towed by an airplane. The banner reads “Exxon: Time to pay for climate lies” and “Prosecute Exxon.” ExxonMobil is currently under investigation by the New York Attorney General to determine if the company lied about the risks of climate change. ExxonMobil’s corporate headquarters is in nearby Irving. © Ron Heflin / Greenpeace

    The source contacted by Reuters provides the most detailed account of what allegedly occurred. According to that account, the hacking scheme began in late 2015, with DCI arranging targets, providing them to Forlit, who then worked with third-party contractors to conduct hacking. Reuters determined that “In an effort to push a narrative that Exxon was the target of a political vendetta aimed at destroying its business, some of the stolen material was subsequently leaked to the media by DCI.” Moreover, the source alleges that the National Association of Manufacturers, an industry group that received funding from Exxon, used hacked material to pressure the U.S. Supreme Court to drop a lawsuit against Exxon, Energy Transfer subsidiary Sunoco, and other oil and gas companies. The lawsuit was filed by the city and county of Honolulu and charges the companies for climate damages.

    Both DCI and Exxon have publicly stated that they were not involved in any illegal activity, including hacking. An Exxon spokesperson told the Wall Street Journal in 2023 that the company “has no knowledge of Azari, had no involvement in any hacking activities and has not been accused of any wrongdoing. To be clear, ExxonMobil has done nothing wrong”. A spokesperson stated that “if there was any hacking involved, we condemn it in the strongest possible terms” to NPR two years later. 

    DCI partner Craig Stevens denied the firm’s involvement in a statement to NPR, saying “Allegations of DCI’s involvement with hacking supposedly occurring nearly a decade ago are false and unsubstantiated… Meanwhile, radical anti-oil activists and their donors are peddling conspiracy theories to distract from their own anti-U.S. energy activities”.

    Neither company has been charged with any wrongdoing, though environmental groups and a few U.S. senators have called for a formal investigation. Initial investigations around Azari involved additional clients that have not been named; Forlit also had other clients though extradition orders focus on his involvement with DCI and Exxon. According to an anonymous source to the Wall Street Journal, DCI partner Justin Peterson commissioned the hacking and was a key connection to Forlit.

    Citizen Lab’s research, as well as court documents against Azari, indicate that there is a large hack-for-hire industry whose clients may include a range of organizations from large oil and gas companies like Exxon, to financial firms, industry groups, and so on. Targets of these hacking schemes include climate groups like Greenpeace, but have also included public defenders, government officials, politicians, financial companies, banks, and others.Citizen Lab did not identify Azari, Forlit, or other individuals working as private investigators who sought hacking services. The investigation of Azari and Forlit came from FBI probes into hacking operations. 

    Despite the sentencing of Azari in 2023, the clients who ordered or benefited from hacking were never named. The Southern District of New York identified that Exxon publicly used hacked material, suggesting they may be a client of the hack-for-hire operations. Many victims of hacking were notified by Citizen Lab during their investigations, however the full extent of the hacking scheme is still unknown.

    The lack of any real investigation by Exxon is another example of the oil and gas industry avoiding accountability. Compounded with their efforts to seek legal immunity using tactics employed by the gun industry, filing SLAPP and other predatory lawsuits against journalists and activists, financially backing anti-protest legislation at the state and federal level, and a decades-long disinformation campaign, the industry may stop at nothing to ensure its dominance. 

    Despite evidence to the contrary, Exxon has continued to deny any involvement in the hack-for-hire scheme being investigated and the full extent of the hack is still unclear. 

    As a result, we are calling on:

    • The U.S. Department of Justice to fully investigate the hack-for-hire scheme.
    • Exxon’s board to commission an independent, internal investigation to determine how Exxon became connected to the hacking scheme, and to identify who may have been involved.
    • Congress to resist all attempts by the fossil fuel industry to secure a “liability waiver” which would grant “immunity” from any effort to hold the industry accountable for climate damages. 

    The details of the hack-for-hire scheme have been revealed over the last six years with research by Citizen Lab and the federal investigation of two private investigators. Clients and benefactors of the hacking have yet to be formally investigated.

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Trump Executive Orders roll back ocean protections

    Source: Greenpeace Statement –

    WASHINGTON, DC (April 18, 2025) – Yesterday, the Trump administration issued a new Executive Order that opens vast swaths of protected ocean to commercial exploitation, including areas within the Pacific Islands Heritage Marine National Monument. It allows commercial fishing in areas long considered off-limits due to their ecological significance—despite overwhelming scientific consensus that marine sanctuaries are essential for rebuilding fish stocks and maintaining ocean health. These actions threaten some of the most sensitive and pristine marine ecosystems in the world. In response to the announcement, Arlo Hemphill, Greenpeace USA project lead on ocean sanctuaries, said:

    “Opening the Pacific Islands Heritage Marine National Monument to commercial fishing puts one of the most pristine ocean ecosystems on the planet at risk. Almost 90 percent of global marine fish stocks are fully exploited or overfished. The few places in the world ocean set aside as large, fully protected ocean sanctuaries serve as ‘fish banks’, allowing fish populations to recover, while protecting the habitats in which they thrive. President Bush and President Obama had the foresight to protect the natural resources of the Pacific for future generations, and Greenpeace USA condemns the actions of President Trump today to reverse that progress.”

    A second Executive Order calls for deregulation of America’s fisheries under the guise of boosting seafood production. 

    John Hocevar, Oceans Campaign Director at Greenpeace USA, said: 

    “If President Trump wants to increase U.S. fisheries production and stabilize seafood markets, deregulation will have the opposite effect. Meanwhile, the Trump administration has already slashed jobs at NOAA and is threatening to dismantle the agency responsible for providing the science that makes management of U.S. fisheries possible. Trump’s executive order on fishing could set us back by decades, undoing all the progress that has been made to end overfishing and rebuild fish stocks and America’s fisheries. While there is far too little attention to bycatch and habitat destruction, NOAA’s record of fisheries management has made the U.S. a world leader. Trump seems ready to throw that out the window with all the care of a toddler tossing his toys out of the crib.”

    The executive orders, announced on April 17, 2025, are detailed here:
    Restoring American Seafood Competitiveness
    Fact Sheet: President Donald J. Trump Unleashes American Commercial Fishing in the Pacific

    ###

    Contact: Gujari Singh, Greenpeace USA Campaign Communication Manager, [email protected], 631-404-9977

    Greenpeace USA is part of a global network of independent campaigning organizations that use peaceful protest and creative communication to expose global environmental problems and promote solutions that are essential to a green and peaceful future. Greenpeace USA is committed to transforming the country’s unjust social, environmental, and economic systems from the ground up to address the climate crisis, advance racial justice, and build an economy that puts people first. Learn more at www.greenpeace.org/usa.

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: USA: Google must move to a rights respecting approach after court declares it’s Adtech function a monopoly  

    Source: Amnesty International –

    Responding to a US court ruling declaring Google’s online advertising monopoly illegal, Agnès Callamard, Secretary General of Amnesty International, said: 

    “A rights respecting break-up of Google’s monopolistic hold could be an important first step towards an online world that respects human rights. By eroding the dominance of a single corporation and weakening Google’s control over our data, it makes space that must be filled by actors committed to upholding human rights.” 

    “Google’s current model thrives on harvesting, analysing, sharing with others and profiting from people’s  personal data. This toxic, surveillance-based approach – shared by other Big Tech companies including Meta and TikTok  – undermines the right to privacy and has given Google sheer market dominance, leaving no space for alternatives which respect our rights. 

    Agnès Callamard, Secretary General of Amnesty International

    “As the world’s most used search engine, Google wields enormous power over whether people  can navigate the internet with assurance that their rights are protected. Every company has a responsibility to respect human rights, and Google has failed to adequately demonstrate how its model can uphold users’ rights. 

    “It is extremely difficult to go online without having to hand over personal data to Google and other big tech companies, even when you have not signed up for their services or consented to this intrusion and monetization of your private data. 

    “Now that Google’s advertising services have been ruled an illegal monopoly, it is time to move toward a rights-respecting structural break-up of Google.” 

    MIL OSI NGO