Category: NGOs

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Ethiopia: Thousands remain locked up in ‘travesty of justice’ in Amhara region

    Source: Amnesty International –

    ‘The international silence over the mass and arbitrary detention of thousands of people in Amhara region is beyond shameful’ – Tigere Chagutah

    Today marks four months since the launch of a state-led campaign of mass arbitrary detention of thousands of people in Ethiopia’s Amhara region.

    Amnesty International’s Regional Director for East and Southern Africa, Tigere Chagutah, said: 

    “The international silence over the mass and arbitrary detention of thousands of people in Amhara region is beyond shameful. Ethiopia’s development partners, as well as African and global human rights bodies, must use their influence to publicly call for the release of all arbitrarily detained people. The world must stop turning a blind eye to Ethiopia’s human rights crisis as the Ethiopian government continues to trample on the rule of law. 

    “Keeping thousands of people locked up for months without charge or trial is a travesty of justice and a blatant human rights violation. Not only are thousands of people behind bars without any legal basis, but the Ethiopian authorities have also continued to arbitrarily arrest people in the Amhara region. Authorities must immediately release everyone who is being arbitrarily held or charge them with internationally recognised crimes. 

    “International pressure on Ethiopia is essential as authorities continue to crush civic space including suspending four prominent human rights organisations, one of which is 32 years old.”  

    Thousands arbitrarily detained

    On 28 September 2024, Ethiopia’s army and Amhara regional security forces arbitrarily rounded up thousands of people across Amhara region and brought them to four mass detention centres. Members of the judiciary, judges, prosecutors and academics were among the people targeted. 

    The arrests took place amid fighting between Ethiopia’s military and Amhara armed groups, which continues. 

    Four judiciary workers were released in October 2024. In January 2025, authorities released hundreds of people, including three judges, women, elderly people and people suffering chronic health issues. Thousands remain arbitrarily detained. 

    View latest press releases

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Ethiopia: Urgent international action needed to end mass arbitrary detentions in the Amhara Region

    Source: Amnesty International –

    As today marks four months since the launch of a state-led campaign of mass arbitrary detention of thousands of people in Ethiopia’s Amhara region in September 2024, Amnesty International’s Regional Director for East and Southern Africa, Tigere Chagutah, said: 

    “The international silence over the mass and arbitrary detention of thousands of people in Amhara region is beyond shameful. Ethiopia’s development partners, as well as African and global human rights bodies, must use their influence to publicly call for the release of all arbitrarily detained people. The world must stop turning a blind eye to Ethiopia’s human rights crisis as the Ethiopian government continues to trample on the rule of law. 

    “Keeping thousands of people locked up for months without charge or trial is a travesty of justice and a blatant human rights violation. Not only are thousands of people behind bars without any legal basis, but the Ethiopian authorities have also continued to arbitrarily arrest people in the Amhara region. Authorities must immediately release everyone who is being arbitrarily held or charge them with internationally recognized crimes. 

    “International pressure on Ethiopia is essential as authorities continue to crush civic space, including suspending four prominent human rights organizations, one of which is 32 years old.”  

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Attacks on reproductive health will have devastating consequences worldwide story Jan 28, 2025

    Source: Doctors Without Borders –

    “There are deadly consequences anytime access to sexual and reproductive health care is restricted,” said MSF USA CEO Avril Benoît. “In the countries where MSF works, our staff see the lifesaving impact of comprehensive sexual and reproductive health services—and we have seen patients who have died or suffered life-altering injuries because they were denied access to care. In emergency cases where urgent care is needed, delays in access to safe abortion care pose substantial risks to patients’ health and wellbeing. While MSF stands committed to ensuring people have access to essential medical services, we can’t do it alone. Across the world, we work closely with other health providers who are now essentially banned from doing their jobs and providing patients with essential information, referrals, and direct services.”

    An MSF nurse holds medication for an abortion with pills. A safe abortion with pills is over 95% effective and is extremely safe, with less than a 1% chance of severe complications. The risk of death from a safe abortion is lower than from an injection of penicillin or from carrying a pregnancy to term. | Mozambique 2023 © Miora Rajaonary

    Far-reaching and harmful consequences for any person who can become pregnant

    The Geneva Consensus Declaration is a non-binding political statement which asserts that country governments have no obligation to facilitate abortion care. The Geneva Consensus Declaration purposefully distorts the meaning of international agreements on health and human rights in support of this position to rationalize restrictions on patient-centered sexual and reproductive health services. The consequences of the Global Gag Rule and influence of the Geneva Consensus Declaration will be far-reaching and harmful for any person who can become pregnant, including people seeking health care in crisis- and conflict-affected settings, like those in which MSF operates.

    MSF does not accept US government funding and its programs are not directly affected by the Global Gag Rule. However, MSF health care providers have seen firsthand how policies impeding access to sexual and reproductive health services harm patients and communities globally.

    When safe abortion care is not accessible, it increases the likelihood that individuals will seek out unsafe abortion methods, one of the leading causes of maternal death and injury worldwide. The risk of unsafe abortion is elevated in humanitarian settings where it’s even harder for people to access medical services. In 2023, MSF provided more than 31,000 consultations for post-abortion care, most of which were due to complications related to unsafe abortion. With the reinstatement of the Global Gag Rule, MSF expects these already troubling numbers to increase.

    “The reinstatement of the Global Gag Rule will have devastating consequences for health,” said Rachel Milkovich, global health policy specialist at MSF USA. “It means that people around the world will have fewer points of service for their sexual and reproductive health needs, fewer safe places to talk about their medical options, and fewer providers to go to for help during medical emergencies. Health care providers should not be forced to navigate political considerations and complexities before providing patients with essential and lifesaving sexual and reproductive health services.”

    About the Global Gag Rule

    In 2017, President Trump expanded the Global Gag Rule to all US global health assistance, affecting an estimated $12 billion, including more than 1,300 global health grants in more than 70 countries. Previously, the policy only applied to US assistance for family planning and reproductive health. The expanded policy impacted projects related to HIV/AIDS, maternal and child health, malaria, nutrition, sexual and gender-based violence, tuberculosis, and other health programs. The Global Gag Rule exacerbates the harm of the Helms Amendment, which prohibits all US-funded organizations from using US foreign assistance to fund abortion-related services.

    When the Global Gag Rule was last in place, from 2017 to 2021, health advocates reported widespread clinic closures, termination of mobile outreach programs, loss of integrated health programs, weakened health advocacy coalitions, and fractured referral networks. Even four years after the policy’s rescindment, organizations are still trying to rebuild programs lost due to the Global Gag Rule.

    The Global Gag Rule puts organizations in an impossible position. Either they must comply with the policy to receive US government funding—restricting the provision of sexual and reproductive health services and information to the communities they serve—or decide not to comply and lose access to significant financial support, which many organizations rely on to operate. Those unable to access alternative funding may be forced to cut staff or services. Some may be forced to close their programs altogether. In either scenario, patients lose access to vital health services.

    The Global Gag Rule has been repeatedly reinstated or rescinded for the last 40 years, according to the will of the administration in power. It is not feasible or sustainable for organizations to constantly adjust their services each time there is a change in the US government’s political priorities.

    To stop the pervasive harm caused by the Global Gag Rule, MSF USA is calling for a permanent end to the policy. MSF USA supports the Global Health, Empowerment, and Rights (Global HER) Act, which would permanently repeal the Global Gag Rule, and preserve access to safe abortion care.

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: DRC: warring parties must prioritise civilian protection and humanitarian access amid ‘devastating violence’ in Goma

    Source: Amnesty International –

    The Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC)’s regional and international partners must put pressure on all parties to the conflict in the east of the country — including the Rwandan-backed M23 fighters, the Rwandan and Congolese armies, and their allies — to prioritise the protection of civilians in the aftermath of the recent fighting in Goma, Amnesty International said today.

    Responding to the escalation of violence in the region, Tigere Chagutah, Amnesty International’s Regional Director for East and Southern Africa, said: 

    “Thousands of Congolese civilians are once again fleeing for their lives, in desperate need of safety and humanitarian aid.

    “Civilians face a grave risk of human rights violations amid this latest escalation. Over the past year, both sides have ramped up their use of explosive weapons in densely populated areas, with devastating consequences for civilians.

    “The M23, backed by Rwanda, must comply with international humanitarian law. They must ensure the safety of civilians, including human rights defenders and journalists, and those critical of Rwanda and the M23.

    “Amnesty International calls on all parties to the conflict to prioritise the protection of civilians amid this devastating violence.  With thousands in and around Goma seeking shelter, food, water, sanitation and healthcare, the parties to the conflict must allow the passage of safe and unrestricted humanitarian access to all those in need.”

    Devastating violence

    On Monday (27 January), the M23 declared that it had seized control of Goma, the DRC’s third-largest city and home to nearly two million people. This development occurred despite the UN Secretary General’s call for Rwanda to withdraw its troops from the DRC and cease its support for the M23 fighters. Reports from the city described ongoing gunfire and explosions, alongside unverified reports on social media and by journalists of looting, indiscriminate shooting, and shelling in the city. The DRC government has not officially acknowledged losing control of Goma.

    Humanitarian organisations, including Medecins Sans Frontieres, report that over 400,000 people were displaced in January due to the ongoing conflict in the region. Many sought refuge in and around Goma, a city that was already sheltering over 600,000 internally displaced persons (IDPs).

    Reports from Rwandan media indicated that Rwanda has received several civilians seeking refuge, while others fled Goma to Bukavu, provincial capital of South Kivu, via Lake Kivu. Following the capture of Goma, the M23 ordered the suspension of all activities on the lake, which could hinder the movement of people fleeing the fighting in Goma. Certain areas of the city are without access to water and electricity, as the conflict has damaged critical infrastructure.

    Military operation

    On 18 January, the M23, backed by Rwandan forces, launched a military operation to expand its territory, violating a ceasefire agreement between Rwanda and the DRC established through the Luanda Peace Process. On 21 January, the M23 claimed to have captured several cities, including the strategically important supply city of Minova in South Kivu province, located about 20 kilometres from Goma across Lake Kivu.

    On 24 January, heavy fighting was reported near Sake, more than 20 kilometres north-west of Goma, where the Armed Forces of the DRC (FARDC), supported by the Southern African Mission in the Democratic Republic of Congo (SAMIRDRC), UN forces (MONUSCO), and a coalition of militia groups, were seeking to halt the M23’s advance toward Goma. The same day, a spokesperson for the M23, as well as Rwandan media, said the military governor of North Kivu, General Peter Cirimwami, was shot while visiting troops on the frontlines near Sake. His death was later confirmed by Congolese officials.

    According to a statement issued on 25 January by the South African National Defence Force, nine South African soldiers deployed under SAMIRDRC and UN forces were killed in the fighting. Malawi authorities also reported the deaths of three of their soldiers serving in the SAMIRDRC.

     

    The UN Security Council met on 26 January to assess the situation in North-Kivu. The next day, M23 rebels said they had taken control of Goma. In its statement, the Security Council condemned M23’s advances in North-Kivu and called on the armed group to stop its offensive as it gave rise to a major humanitarian crisis and called for the protection of civilians. The Security Council also called for the withdrawal of the external forces from DRC and re-affirmed the sovereignty of the DRC. The Security Council’s decisions should be respected and implemented by all parties.

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: DRC: Warring parties must prioritize civilian protection and humanitarian access in Goma

    Source: Amnesty International –

    The Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC)’s regional and international partners must exert pressure on all parties to the conflict in the east of the country — including the Rwandan-backed M23 fighters, the Rwandan and Congolese armies, and their allies — to prioritize the protection of civilians in the aftermath of the recent fighting in Goma, Amnesty International said today.

    “Thousands of Congolese civilians are once again fleeing for their lives, in desperate need of safety and humanitarian aid. Amnesty International calls on all parties to the conflict to prioritize the protection of civilians amid this devastating violence

    Tigere Chagutah, Amnesty International’s Regional Director for East and Southern Africa

    On 27 January, the M23 declared that it had seized control of Goma, the DRC’s third-largest city, provincial capital of North-Kivu and home to nearly two million people. This development occurred despite the UN Secretary General’s call for Rwanda to withdraw its troops from the DRC and cease its support for the M23 fighters. Reports from the city described ongoing gunfire and explosions, alongside unverified reports on social media and by journalists of looting, indiscriminate shooting, and shelling in the city. The DRC government has not officially acknowledged losing control of Goma.

    “Thousands of Congolese civilians are once again fleeing for their lives, in desperate need of safety and humanitarian aid. Amnesty International calls on all parties to the conflict to prioritize the protection of civilians amid this devastating violence,” said Tigere Chagutah, Amnesty International’s Regional Director for East and Southern Africa.

    Serious human rights violations, including killings of civilians, sexual violence, and the targeting of activists and human rights defenders, have often accompanied past conflicts in eastern DRC, such as during the M23’s takeover of Goma in 2012. Some of these violations could amount to war crimes when committed in armed conflict.

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Their Profits, Our Loss: International oil and gas companies’ 2024 profits

    Source: Greenpeace Statement –

    SYDNEY, Tuesday 28 January 2025 — Interested media are advised of the annual results announcements by some of the world’s largest oil and gas companies for 2024, which was confirmed to be the hottest on record. This includes Australian-based gas giant Woodside. 

    As LA continues to burn and extreme weather events impact regions across the world, Greenpeace spokespeople in Australia and globally are available to discuss the role of oil and gas majors in fuelling climate chaos. Spokespeople can also present Greenpeace’s demand that governments worldwide introduce equitably designed taxes and fines to reclaim money from the industry to pay for the spiralling costs of extreme weather events.

    Annual profit announcements will be made in the coming weeks:

    • Shell: 30 January
    • ExxonMobil: 31 January
    • Chevron: 31 January 
    • TotalEnergies: 5 February
    • Equinor: 5 February 
    • BP: 6 February 
    • Woodside: 25 February

    Solaye Snider, Climate and Energy campaigner at Greenpeace Australia Pacific, said: “Off the back of the hottest year on record, Woodside will soon announce its annual profits from extracting and exporting fossil fuels. Right now, much of Australia is gripped by an extreme heatwave stretching from Perth to Brisbane, with sweltering temperatures, wild storms and flash flooding battering communities across the country.

    “In the midst of a cost of living crisis, it’s not right that fossil fuel executives are taking home million dollar pay cheques while fuelling climate destruction across the globe. Everyday Australians should not be footing the bill for climate-fuelled disasters, while fossil fuel corporations like Woodside and Santos continue to profit. Big polluters should pay for the damage their reckless pursuit of profit is causing to communities and the environment across the world.”

    Ian Duff, Co-Head of Greenpeace International’s Stop Drilling Start Paying campaign, said: “The annual profits of oil and gas companies are driving our losses. While their earnings go from extremely high to very high, their pollution remains at record levels. Ordinary people can no longer foot the bill for the greed of dirty energy companies or bear the costs for loss and damage which are fuelled by Big Oil’s emissions. Governments must stand with the people – not the oil and gas lobby – and finally enforce the Polluters Pay principle.” 

    The Greenpeace Stop Drilling Start Paying global campaign is working with millions of people to stop oil and gas companies from expanding, resist their intimidation, and ensure they pay for climate damages already felt by people across the world. greenpeace.org.au/act/make-polluters-pay

    -ENDS-

    For more information or interviews contact Kate O’Callaghan on 0406 231 892 or [email protected]

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: New survey reveals extent of Israel’s failure to improve humanitarian access in Gaza in the year since ICJ ruling

    Source: Oxfam –

    As pause in hostilities allows aid to flow in, agencies call for accountability and for same cycles of neglect and impunity not to be repeated 

    A new survey of 35 aid agencies working in Gaza found that Israel failed to improve humanitarian access over the last year, despite a ruling from the International Court of Justice (ICJ) demanding immediate action to protect Palestinians in Gaza from acts of genocide and risk of irreparable harm to their rights.  

    The survey, conducted among NGOs including Oxfam, Islamic Relief, Médecins du Monde, ActionAid and the Norwegian Refugee Council reveals how Israel systematically denied and restricted aid, supplies and services both into and within Gaza since the ICJ ruling on 26 January 2024. It found that up until the commencement of the temporary ceasefire:

    • 89 per cent of those completing the survey said that Israeli actions regarding the provision of aid had worsened since the ICJ’s ruling.
    • 93 per cent said the humanitarian situation for the people receiving their aid and services had deteriorated.
    • 100 per cent of surveyed agencies importing humanitarian supplies into Gaza said the Israeli procedures for aid entry were either ineffective, had systematically impeded the humanitarian response, or were insufficient to meet the huge needs.
    •  95 per cent of agencies who imported aid supplies inside the Gaza Strip said they regularly encountered delays, with some reporting delays of more than two months.
    • Agencies reported essential items like personal protective equipment (PPE), tarpaulins, winterization supplies, mobile kitchens, hygiene kits, food and educational materials being denied due to the “dual use” procedure – because Israel deemed there was potential for them to be utilised for military use.

    “Given the volume of aid now entering Gaza, it is clear how much Israel has been obstructing the humanitarian response for the last 15 months. As the survey shows, Israel completely failed to improve humanitarian conditions, in disregard of international law, while systematically preventing life-saving aid from getting in.

    Oxfam’s Policy Lead, Bushra Khalidi

    Oxfam

    Oxfam’s Policy Lead, Bushra Khalidi, said: “Given the volume of aid now entering Gaza, it is clear how much Israel has been obstructing the humanitarian response for the last 15 months. As the survey shows, Israel completely failed to improve humanitarian conditions, in disregard of international law, while systematically preventing life-saving aid from getting in.

    “It is vital to assess past failures, even amid a ceasefire. Without accountability and a commitment to protecting humanitarian operations, we risk repeating the same cycles of impunity and neglect, leaving millions without hope of a better future.”

    The survey is part of a humanitarian access snapshot, produced by NGOs, which examines Israel’s compliance with the ICJ measure regarding the provision of humanitarian assistance. It found that the provision of essentials like food, water, fuel, shelter and sanitation in Gaza fell well below the minimum required to sustain life for Palestinians in Gaza, that Israeli policies and actions resulted in the dismantlement of the humanitarian architecture and operational environment in the Gaza Strip.

    Dr Jean-François Corty, President of Médecins du Monde, said: “Now that aid is getting into Gaza, the next weeks will be critical but challenging, given the level of destruction Israel has rained down upon Gaza and its near-total decimation of the humanitarian infrastructure and operational capacity.”

    The survey revealed the extremely challenging conditions aid workers in Gaza have faced, with Israel conducting systematic attacks on basic services and humanitarian infrastructure and personnel:

    •  94 per cent of aid workers from the reporting organizations had been displaced at least once – many of them multiple times.
    •  72 per cent of aid agencies surveyed report that their premises were damaged due to air or ground attacks by Israeli forces at least once since 26 January 2024, with many organisations reporting multiple attacks. At least 7 agencies’ offices in Gaza city were heavily damaged or destroyed as well as several NGO run medical centres.
    • 93 per cent of aid agencies surveyed had to forcibly relocate their operations at least once since the ICJ ruling, mainly due to Israeli displacement orders and military offensives. Almost all have had to relocate multiple times.

    “Now that aid is getting into Gaza, the next weeks will be critical but challenging, given the level of destruction Israel has rained down upon Gaza and its near-total decimation of the humanitarian infrastructure and operational capacity.”

    Dr Jean-François Corty, President of Médecins du Monde

    Médecins du Monde

    The snapshot also highlights the failure of Third States to fully meet their obligations to prevent atrocity crimes including the risk of genocide. It underscores that some states continue to supply weapons and support to the Government of Israel, while refraining from denouncing violations or taking meaningful action to prevent them.  

    The agencies are calling for continued, unhindered humanitarian access and for the international community to urgently address Israel’s ongoing violations of international law.

    Riham Jafari, Communication and advocacy coordinator at ActionAid, Occupied Palestinian Territories, said: “It is essential that humanitarian access is not only immediate but sustained and unimpeded. The rights of Palestinians in Gaza must be protected from acts of genocide, and Israel must be held to account for its continued violations of international law. Without meaningful accountability, the suffering will only deepen, and the path to justice and peace will remain blocked.”

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Egypt: Repression intensifies ahead of human rights record review

    Source: Amnesty International –

    Egyptian authorities have embarked on a renewed crackdown on peaceful dissent, through arbitrary detentions and politically-motivated criminal investigations, while preparing to defend the country’s human rights record during the Universal Period Review by the UN on 28 January, Amnesty International said today.

    In January alone, authorities ramped up their targeting of several critics. A criminal investigation was opened against renowned human rights defender Hossam Bahgat, while prominent opposition politician and publisher Hisham Kassem learned for the first time about a criminal investigation against him, which had been initiated the previous year. Meanwhile, Nada Mogheeth, spouse of detained cartoonist Ashraf Omar, was arrested in connection with an interview she gave with journalist Ahmed Serag, who was himself arrested the day before for the same interview. TikToker Mohamed Allam, known as Rivaldo, was also arrested over viral videos critical of President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

    “It is a stark irony that the Egyptian government launched this crackdown just ahead of its appearance before the Human Rights Council. The government is sending a crystal clear message that it has no intention of tolerating any form of dissent or improving its abysmal human rights record,” said Mahmoud Shalaby, Egypt Researcher at Amnesty International.

    The government is sending a crystal clear message that it has no intention of tolerating any form of dissent or improving its abysmal human rights record

    Mahmoud Shalaby, Egypt Researcher at Amnesty International

    “The crackdown also coincides with the lead up to the anniversary of the 25 January Revolution of 2011, a period marked year after year by relentless targeting of actual or suspected dissidents in an attempt by President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi’s government to prevent any protests or commemorations.”

    Politically-motivated criminal investigations

    On 15 January, the Supreme State Security Prosecution (SSSP) summoned Hossam Bahgat, executive director of the Egyptian Initiative for Personal Rights (EIPR), for questioning on 19 January. Prosecutors opened an investigation into him on charges of “spreading false news” and “aiding and funding a terrorist group.” The latter offence is punishable by a life sentence or the death penalty.

    Hossam Bahgat told Amnesty International that prosecutors questioned him for four hours about the establishment of EIPR, its work and funding. They also grilled him about an EIPR statement – which had prompted a threat of legal action from the Ministry of Interior – about deteriorating detention conditions at 10th of Ramadan prison. He was released on EGP 20,000 bail (around USD 398), but the criminal investigation against him remains open.

    Prosecutors told Hossam Bahgat that the charges stem from multiple complaints filed by regular citizens, as well as from the National Security Agency (NSA). He told Amnesty International that prosecutors refused to allow him or his lawyers to review these complaints. Prosecutors only read one line to him from the NSA’s investigations, which accused Hossam Bahgat of “receiving instructions from foreign organizations and proactive elements to spread rumours and false information in order to undermining state institutions, disturbing public order, and spreading fear among citizens”.

    On 2 January, Hisham Kassem learned through news websites that he has a hearing scheduled for 9 February in a new criminal case on charges of “defamation” and “intentional disturbance.” These charges are related to his same social media post for which he was unjustly convicted, sentenced and imprisoned in 2024. In the post from 29 July 2023, Hisham Kassem referred to alleged corruption by two former government ministers. His lawyer, Nasser Amin, told Amnesty International that Hisham Kassem was never notified about the new case, which was initiated by a complaint filed by one of the former ministers on 16 September 2023. The court held a hearing for the new case on 11 December 2023 without informing Hisham Kassem.

    Government critics detained

    On 16 January, two men in plain clothes arrested Nada Mogheeth at her home without presenting an arrest warrant. According to a lawyer who attended her interrogations, the SSSP prosecutors opened an investigation against her on charges of “joining a terrorist group” and “spreading false news.” These charges are related to a media interview she gave in December 2024 to Ahmed Serag, a journalist at the independent website Zat Masr, in which she discussed the case of her detained husband, Ashraf Omar, who was arrested due to his media work. Prosecutors released her on EGP 5,000 bail.

    The previous day, security forces had arrested Ahmed Serag at his workplace in Cairo. According to his lawyer, SSSP prosecutors opened an investigation against him on charges of “joining a terrorist group,” “using the Zat Masr website to promote the group’s ideas,” “spreading false news,” and “commissioning a crime related to funding terrorism.” Amnesty International learned that the NSA accused Ahmed Serag of “receiving instructions from provocative leaders outside the country to carry out a hostile plan against the state”. He remains detained at 10th of Ramadan Prison.

    On 11 January, security forces arrested 24-year-old Mohamed Allam at a relative’s house in Giza governorate. In the weeks prior, Allam had posted several videos on TikTok critical of President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi. In one of the videos, reviewed by Amnesty International, he stated that “al-Sisi and his government are afraid of an uprising” and listed several issues he claimed were caused by the government, including the “ruin of education and the economy,” as well as the detention of individuals simply for expressing their views.

    Security forces brought Mohamed Allam before the SSSP on 20 January, after they forcibly disappeared for more than a week at an NSA facility in Giza. SSSP prosecutors investigated him on charges of “joining a terrorist group,” “inciting the commission of terrorist crimes,” and “spreading false news.” Mohamed Allam told prosecutors that NSA agents subjected him to electric shocks, beatings, and kept him blindfolded, according to his lawyer Nabeh Elganadi. Prosecutors referred him for forensic examination based on his statement. He remains retained at 10th of Ramdan Prison.

    Background

    Egypt’s human rights record will be examined by the UN Human Rights Council’s Universal Periodic Review Working Group on 28 January 2025. In its submission, Amnesty International highlighted Egypt’s protracted and ongoing human rights and impunity crisis.

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Destruction of life and homes leaves people unable to return safely to Rafah Gaza

    Source: Médecins Sans Frontières –

    After 15 months of Israel’s war on Gaza, Palestine, and the implementation of the ceasefire on 19 January 2025, displaced Palestinians are attempting to return home to the southern city of Rafah. According to the United Nations, nearly 70 percent of all structures in Gaza have been destroyed or damaged. Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) continues to call for an immediate massive scale-up of humanitarian aid.

    “Health services, including the rest of humanitarian aid, and rebuilding of the city is needed for life to be able to come back to Rafah, but it’s still too dangerous for people to return in most areas,” says Pascale Coissard, MSF’s emergency coordinator support . “As we were going to visit the former MSF Shabboura clinic in Rafah, we saw a child playing with a shell in Mawasi area. Although we cannot hear the bombs anymore, there are still dangers.”

    People are trying to rebuild from the rubble. Rafah is destroyed, with homes, shops, streets and healthcare facilities in ruins and electricity and water systems damaged. The area is also unsafe due to scattered unexploded artillery in the remnants of buildings, which will take years to clean.

    An ambulances moves through the ruins of Rafah. Gaza, Palestine, 22 January 2025. 
    MSF

    In May 2024, Rafah had the largest concentration of displaced Palestinians in the Gaza Strip, with an estimated 1.5 million people living in tents and makeshift shelters. In these inhumane conditions, people faced disease outbreaks, malnutrition, and the psychological impact of being forcibly displaced multiple times.

    MSF teams working in Rafah had been providing basic healthcare and mental health support in the Shabboura clinic and supporting paediatric and maternity care in the Ministry of Health’s Emirati hospital. But were forced to close activities and evacuate the area after continuous bombings and evacuations orders from Israeli forces. The looming threat of a ground invasion by Israeli forces materialised on 6 May 2024.

    The military operations by Israeli forces led to the emptying of Rafah, mass destruction of the city, and to the closure of the Rafah crossing, which severely hindered the delivery of humanitarian aid into the entire Strip. Rafah was also the home to many MSF colleagues, who were forced to flee to other parts of the Gaza Strip.

    “It’s extremely difficult to come back to the same place that used to be full of life,” says Nadia Abo Mallouh, MSF medical coordinator support who used to work in the Emirati hospital. “We couldn’t even recognise the streets where Emirati hospital was. It’s sad seeing the hospital that used to bring life to earth totally empty, no signs of life, everything is destroyed.”

    As a result of destroyed infrastructure, healthcare and other basic services are lacking. Many people are trying to return to Rafah but are unable to, as they find their homes destroyed – sometimes their neighbourhoods are unrecognisable.  It will take a long time before people can safely return to Rafah.

    “Honestly, the sights [of Rafah] were horrifying; so much destruction,” says Hadi Abo-Eneen, and MSF watchmen who was displaced from Rafah city in May 2024 and visited the area after the ceasefire. “I kept walking, hoping to find something from my house. It was completely destroyed. It was a huge shock, because this was my whole life: my home. My family’s, wife’s and children’s memories are there. My belongings, clothes, dishes, my wedding memories: everything.”

    In the meantime, people continue surviving in makeshift tents mainly in the coastal area of Mawasi. There, they have no proper shelter, nor access to food and water and limited access to healthcare services. At the same time, Palestinians in the north of Gaza are facing similar conditions, after the recent brutal Israeli military siege, which left the area completely destroyed.

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: What do trade unions have to do with human rights?

    Source: Amnesty International –

    Trade unions are critical to protecting and promoting human rights including economic, social, and cultural rights and the right to be free from discrimination.

    First, they play a key role through negotiations with employers and collective action in supporting workers’ rights. In so doing, unions balance the scales of power, ensuring that workers are in a position to advocate for their rights, and holding those who run wealthy and powerful companies to account.

    Second, the benefits of trade unions go far beyond the workplace. Unions are the fuel that keeps the fires of social justice and people power burning so that workers’ rights are respected and protected by law. Throughout history, unions have been the driving force behind calls on governments and employers to acknowledge and prevent human rights abuses that are connected to their business operations. They also ensure laws are adopted and reformed to better respect and protect the rights of workers.

    Finally, unions have a long history of solidarity with other global human rights movements. From strikes in the 80s against apartheid in South Africa to the union-backed campaigns against Israel’s genocide of Palestinians in Gaza, their actions consistently demonstrate the bond between trade unionism and social justice.

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Israel/OPT: Genocide ‘matter of law and evidence, not opinion’ and UK government must ensure accountability

    Source: Amnesty International –

    Marking the one-year anniversary since the International Court of Justice (ICJ) found plausible risk that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza (Sunday 26 January), Amnesty International said the UK government’s disregard for its legal obligations to prevent genocide had contributed to Israel’s impunity and risked British complicity in serious crimes against international law. 

    Amnesty is calling on the UK government to take urgent and meaningful steps to prevent Israel’s genocidal acts against Palestinians in Gaza, as it is obligated to do as a State Party to the Genocide Convention.   

    The landmark case at the ICJ was brought by South Africa and the court’s judges ordered provisional measures to protect Palestinians from further harm, however these were dismissed by Israel. Amnesty’s own analysis concluded that Israel is engaged in committing genocide in a comprehensive report published last year and it continues to do so. 

    Sacha Deshmukh, Amnesty International UK’s Chief Executive, said: 

    “The UK government should have taken heed of this extremely significant ICJ ruling the day it was announced. UK inaction and disregard for its international obligations to prevent genocide contributed to Israel’s impunity and risked British complicity in serious crimes against international law. 

    “The genocide against the Palestinian people is a matter of law and evidence, not opinion. Prime Minister Keir Starmer must accept the UK’s obligations to prevent Israel’s genocide against Palestinians in Gaza and help ensure there is justice and accountability. 

    “To avoid the risk of itself being complicit in genocide, the UK should have ended all arms transfers to Israel long ago and committed full support to the ICJ and other important international accountability mechanisms. The UK should take those steps urgently now. 

    “The staggering number of Palestinian civilians killed, the colossal scale of physical destruction, the blocking of life-saving aid before the ceasefire, and the stream of dehumanising and racist anti-Palestinian rhetoric from Israeli officials, provide the clear evidential basis for genocidal intent, as defined by law, in Israel’s actions in Gaza.  

    “The UK government must fulfil its duties to stop genocidal acts even when committed by an ally and show clearly that it is UK policy that Palestinian lives matter as much as any other human life.”

    Evidence of genocide 

    In December 2024, Amnesty’s International’s research found sufficient basis to conclude that Israel has committed – and is continuing to commit – genocide against Palestinians in the occupied Gaza Strip. 

    The 296-page report - ‘You Feel Like You Are Subhuman’: Israel’s Genocide Against Palestinians in Gaza - documents how, during its military offensive launched in the wake of the deadly Hamas-led attacks in southern Israel on 7 October 2023, Israel has unleashed hell and destruction on Palestinians in Gaza brazenly, continuously and with total impunity.  Amnesty examined Israel’s acts in Gaza closely and in their totality, taking into account their recurrence and simultaneous occurrence, and both their immediate impact and their cumulative and mutually-reinforcing consequences. Amnesty considered the scale and severity of the casualties and destruction over time, and also analysed public statements by officials – finding that prohibited acts were often announced or called for in the first place by high-level officials in charge of the war efforts. 

    As a state party to the Genocide Convention, the UK has a legal obligation to use all reasonable means to help prevent genocide and be consistent when supporting international law – just as it has done when calling out crimes carried out by Russian forces. 

                           

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Three questions on the intensification of the armed conflict in North and South Kivu DRC

    Source: Médecins Sans Frontières –

    What is the current situation in North and South Kivu with regards to this crisis?

    Since December 2024, several fronts have been opened in the two provinces to control certain key positions. In Lubero territory, in North Kivu province, the conflict resumed in December with massive displacement. It continued in Masisi territory, where intense fighting took place in January 2025, particularly for control of the town of Masisi Centre, before moving down towards South Kivu province, to Minova and Numbi in Kalehe territory.

    During the hostilities, the M23/AFC managed to take control of several towns. In recent days the fighting has moved closer to the provincial capital of Goma, with intense clashes in Sake, just 20 kilometres from the city. Artillery explosions can be heard regularly from Goma.

    Fighting is taking place on all the roads around Goma and has led to a new influx of displaced people into the city, including from some camps on the outskirts of the city where people flee towards Goma, in a situation of panic.

    How is this situation affecting the population?

    Unsurprisingly, the humanitarian consequences for people are very serious. Hundreds of thousands of people have once again fled the fighting. According to the United Nations, 400,000 people have already fled since January. Tens of thousands headed for displacement sites around Goma, where more than 650,000 people were already living, exhausted by almost three years of fighting.

    The clashes in recent weeks have led to a new influx of people into these completely unhygienic sites where – as we have been saying for far too long – families are surviving without proper shelter and lacking everything: food, water, healthcare, etc.

    Unfortunately, these sites are not spared from the fighting. Rockets are being fired near these camps or the health facilities where people have sought shelter. It’s appalling and unacceptable. We are also seeing a very worrying proportion of civilians among the hundreds of wounded we are helping to treat. Some are victims of stray bullets, but others are victims of the warring parties’ failure to respect certain basic rules of conflict.

    In Masisi, the hospital we support came under fire while more than 10,000 people were seeking shelter. Two people were hit just outside the hospital and two of our staff were injured by rocket fire. The presence of combatants or artillery positions in close proximity to health facilities and camps for internally displaced people puts lives at immediate risk. It is important for everyone to remember that even war has its rules.

    What is MSF’s current response on the ground?

    We are doing our utmost to maintain our regular and emergency activities, but in some areas we have had to limit the risks by reducing the size of our teams. Around Goma, for example, direct armed violence has reduced our ability to go to certain affected sites over the past two days, although we continue to supply medical facilities, help them prepare for an influx of wounded, and bring in fuel to run water pumps as soon as conditions allow. This allows these facilities to continue to function, even with a more limited presence of our teams.

    In Goma itself, we continue to support the Kyeshero hospital to treat some of the wounded and to relieve the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), which is on the frontline treating the wounded at the Ndosho hospital. It is clear that the hospitals in Goma are completely overwhelmed by the number of wounded.

    In the rest of North and South Kivu, despite the security and logistical challenges and restrictions on movement, we are maintaining our presence and continuing to treat patients, including the wounded. In three weeks, nearly 400 casualties have been treated at the Minova General Referral hospital, the Numbi hospital centre, and the Masisi General Referral hospital. We are also continuing to support displaced people in more remote areas, such as Lubero, where we are also working to improve access to water in health facilities and at the Magasin site for displaced people.

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: China: Five years on, activists jailed in ‘cruel’ 2019 crackdown must be released

    Source: Amnesty International –

    It is time to step up demands for the Chinese government to release human rights defenders detained after attending a social gathering five years ago, Amnesty International said today.

    In December 2019, a number of human rights activists met in the southeastern city of Xiamen for a dinner and discussion of social issues. From the 26th of that month, and over the weeks that followed, Chinese authorities forcibly disappeared human rights lawyer Ding Jiaxi and legal scholar Xu Zhiyong until they re-surfaced in government detention.

    Amnesty International considers both men prisoners of conscience and has consistently advocated for their immediate and unconditional release.

    “The Xiamen crackdown epitomizes the Chinese authorities’ all-out assault on civil society and the cruelty with which they treat peaceful rights advocates,” said Sarah Brooks, Amnesty International’s China Director.

    At least five other activists were also targeted, and detained, for their affiliation with the gathering. In the months that followed, all seven activists were reportedly held in “residential surveillance at a designated location” (RSDL), a form of secret incommunicado detention that places detainees at increased risk of torture and other forms of ill-treatment.

    “Over the past five years, Xu Zhiyong and Ding Jiaxi – along with several of their companions – have endured arbitrary detention, torture and unfair trials, merely because they attended a private gathering and discussed the civil society situation and current affairs in China.”

    Following closed-door trials, on 10 April 2023 Xu Zhiyong and Ding Jiaxi were sentenced to 14 and 12 years in prison respectively for “subverting state power”. In October 2024, Xu Zhiyong began a hunger strike to protest his treatment in prison, which included being harassed by fellow cellmates, apparently at the behest of prison officials.

    “The continued imprisonment of Xu Zhiyong and Ding Jiaxi is an outrage, and the international community must ramp up pressure on the Chinese government to address this injustice and secure their release,” Sarah Brooks said.

    The Chinese authorities must immediately release Ding and Xu and stop punishing all those who participated in the Xiamen gathering.

    Both Ding and Xu have been the subject of recommendations to Chinese authorities by multiple governments and by UN officials, including High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Türk. Yet concrete actions to demand access to these individuals or to increase the consequences to Chinese authorities for their crackdown on human rights defenders have not materialized.

    “The harsh sentences meted out to Xu and Ding are meant to send a message: that to fight to defend one’s rights is unacceptable to the Chinese government. Yet they persisted, and now their family members carry on advocating for their release with that same conviction.”

    Ding Jiaxi’s wife, Sophie Luo, told Amnesty International ahead of the fifth anniversary of the Xiamen gathering: “I know that attending a private gathering does not violate any laws, and these citizens should not be imprisoned for even a day. Therefore, I will fight tirelessly for the dismissal of this case.”

    A support group active online coordinated by activists in and outside of China is collecting messages and prayers to share with Xu, despite censorship and the risk of government retaliation.

    “The Chinese authorities must immediately release Ding and Xu and stop punishing all those who participated in the Xiamen gathering. The grim picture painted by their continued imprisonment should galvanize international condemnation for China’s crackdown on civil society,” Sarah Brooks said.

    Xu Zhiyong and Ding Jiaxi were prominent members of the New Citizens’ Movement, a loose network of activists founded by Xu in 2012 to promote government transparency and expose corruption. Both had been jailed previously due to their advocacy; Ding served three and a half years and was released in October 2016, while Xu – whose sentence was slightly longer – was released in 2017. 

    Xu and Ding appealed their 2023 convictions, but in November 2023, the Shandong Provincial High Court upheld the verdict and sentence against them. Both have now requested a second appeal.

    In jail, Ding and Xu have been deprived of fundamental rights, including access to reading and writing materials; have severe restrictions on their right to communicate with family and friends; and have reported challenges seeking medical care. Possibly in response to his hunger strike, the Chinese authorities allowed Xu to meet with his lawyer on 26 November 2024. It appears that Xu has since stopped his hunger strike.

    Human rights defenders in China continue to face intimidation, harassment, arbitrary detention, as well as torture and other ill-treatment for defending human rights and exercising their freedoms of expression and association. Such retaliation often also extends to their family members and colleagues.

    As in many cases of Chinese activists, friends and family of Xu and Ding have faced threats and harassment for speaking out. For years, Xu was not only prevented from seeing his family but lacked legal counsel of his choosing; three lawyers appointed by his family withdrew from representing Xu, reportedly due to threats and intimidation from Chinese authorities.

    Other human rights activists targeted in connection with the Xiamen gathering include:

    • Chang Weiping was sentenced to three and a half years in prison; he has served his sentence and was released in July 2024 but remains subject to a travel ban
    • Li Qiaochu received a sentence of three years and eight months; she has served her sentence and was released in August 2024 but remains subject to a travel ban plus two years of deprivation of political rights
    • Zhang Zhongshun was sentenced to four and a half years in prison in November 2024
    • Dai Zhenya and Li Yingjun were released on bail after spending time in RSDL, and they are also subject to a travel ban.

    Amnesty International considers a prisoner of conscience to be any person imprisoned solely because of their political, religious or other conscientiously held beliefs, their ethnic origin, sex, colour, language, national or social origin, socio-economic status, birth, sexual orientation, gender identity or expressionor other status, and who has not used violence or advocated violence or hatred in the circumstances leading to their detention.

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: El Salvador: A thousand days into the state of emergency. “Security” at the expense of human rights.  

    Source: Amnesty International –

    Grave human rights violations under El Salvador’s state of emergency point to a systematic, widespread pattern of state abuse that has seen thousands of arbitrary detentions, the adoption of a policy of torture in detention centres and hundreds of deaths under state custody.

    Since the state of emergency first began on 27 March 2022, Amnesty International has kept track of events, deploying five missions to the country to document the patterns of grave human rights violations. After each trip, the organisation has testified to the gradually deteriorating circumstances of the victims and their families, throwing human rights in the country into ever deeper crisis. Allegations by human rights organisations, protests by victims, concerns expressed by regional bodies and appeals from the international community have all been met by the Salvadoran government with silence, indifference and a lack of transparency, further cementing a model of repression and impunity.

    Increased militarisation, above all in marginalised, impoverished communities, has brought back memories of past horrors, when the armed forces were used to repress the population. This approach, combined with efforts by state agents to stigmatise human rights organisations and the free press and to thwart their efforts, has fostered a climate of fear and intimidation that stifles civil society and spurs self-censorship.

    “What the government calls ‘peace’ is actually an illusion intended to hide a repressive system, a structure of control and oppression that abuses its power and disregards the rights of those who were already invisible—people living in poverty, under state stigma, and marginalization—all in the name of a supposed security defined in a very narrow way”, said Ana Piquer, Americas director at Amnesty International.

    What the government calls ‘peace’ is in fact a mirage that pretends to conceal a repressive system, a structure of control and oppression that abuses its power and disregards the rights of those who were already invisible—people living in poverty, under state stigma, and marginalization—all in the name of a supposed security defined in a very narrow way.

    Ana Piquer, Americas director at Amnesty International.

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: South Sudan receives thousands of displaced and injured people fleeing intensified war in Sudan

    Source: Médecins Sans Frontières –

    Juba – As South Sudan receives a massive influx of tens of thousands of people fleeing the intensified war in Sudan, Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) is scaling up its response to the humanitarian crisis in Renk and surrounding informal settlements along the border. Over the last weeks the number of recently displaced people has surpassed 80,000, including hundreds of people with war wounds. MSF is calling for immediate, coordinated humanitarian and medical support for displaced people to address critical gaps and prevent further suffering.

    Over 5,000 people have crossed into South Sudan each day since the beginning of December, as the fighting escalates near the border in Sudan’s White Nile, Blue Nile, and Sennar states. The influx of people into Renk town and surrounding areas has overwhelmed an area that is already scarce of resources, leaving displaced people in crisis.  

    “We have added 14 tents around the hospital to make space for the war-wounded patients that are arriving at Renk County hospital,” says Emanuele Montobbio, MSF emergency coordinator in Renk. “There is no place for other tents in the surroundings, while patients and their families keep coming to the hospital.”

    “We are working alongside the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) to treat war-wounded patients and manage the growing influx of critical cases and the mass casualty response in pre- and post-operative care wards, but the situation is completely overwhelming and it’s not enough,” he says. “Just a few dozen people have been treated with surgical interventions and tetanus vaccinations in recent weeks, while over 100 wounded patients, many with serious injuries, still await surgery.”

    Outside the transit centres within Renk and in informal settlements, thousands are forced to live under trees or in makeshift shelters, with limited access to food, clean water, healthcare or any other basic services. The poor water and sanitation conditions are heightening the risk of disease outbreaks at a time when Renk is already experiencing a cholera outbreak.  

    “Immediate action must be taken,” says Roselyn Morales, MSF deputy medical coordinator in South Sudan, following the team’s assessment on the ground. “Thousands of people are living in dire conditions under the open sky in informal settlements, facing critical shortages of food, clean water, shelter and healthcare.”

    A stagnant pool of water is the only easily accessible water source in the Jerbana informal settlement. Both humans and livestock depend on this pool, which is gradually drying up. South Sudan, 19 December 2024.
    Isaac Buay/MSF

    “We urgently call on both South Sudanese authorities and international organisations to rapidly scale up their response in Renk and beyond, ensuring that the essential and lifesaving needs of the affected population are addressed without delay,” she says.

    The two transit centres in Renk, which are designed to accommodate a maximum of 8,000 people, are now sheltering over 17,000. While most returnees and refugees initially entered South Sudan through the official Joda border crossing, an increasing number are now crossing through informal routes to the east of Renk. More than 82,000 new arrivals have been recorded in areas including Joda, Duku Duku, Jerbana, Shemmedi, Gosfami, and Atam.  

    “Our village was in flames,” says Alhida Hammed, who is displaced from Sudan’s Blue Nile state and is currently under treatment for a gunshot wound at Renk County hospital. “The houses were blazing, and everyone was running in different directions. We have been displaced and now live under a tree. I have no desire to return home. Home is no longer a home—it is filled with bad memories.” 

    “I used to only hear about air raids, but recently, it became a reality,” says Bashir Ismail, who is from Mosmon in Sudan’s Blue Nile state. “I was at the market buying some items when the bombing started. Something hit me in the chest—it was the most painful experience of my life. I was so disoriented that it felt like I had lost my memory. The next thing I knew, I was in Renk County hospital.” 

    MSF is deploying mobile clinics to provide general healthcare in informal settlements in Gosfami, Atam, Jerbana and Joda, where displaced people are concentrated. On 17 December alone, MSF teams conducted over 250 medical consultations in Gosfami and referred severely ill people to Renk County hospital.

    We are also launching activities in response to the urgent need for water and sanitation in Atam and Jerbana. Additionally, relief items have been delivered to these areas for distribution to 2,500 displaced families. However, despite these efforts, the response remains insufficient due to the absence of other humanitarian organisations in these informal settlements, which has left a significant gap in support for displaced people.

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: MSF condemns RSF violent attack on Bashair Teaching hospital in South Khartoum

    Source: Médecins Sans Frontières –

    Khartoum – Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) strongly condemns the violent incursion by the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) into the emergency room of Bashair Teaching hospital in South Khartoum, Sudan, on 18 December. The attackers fired weapons inside the emergency ward, directly threatened medical staff, and severely disrupted lifesaving care. MSF urgently calls on RSF to respect the neutrality of medical facilities and the safety of healthcare workers.

    This latest attack follows an earlier incident on 11 November, when armed fighters stormed the hospital, fired shots, and killed a patient receiving treatment. These repeated violations of the neutrality of healthcare facilities and the sanctity of medical care are unacceptable.

    “Several RSF soldiers entered the emergency rooms and some of them started firing against medical personnel, threatening patients and MSF and Ministry of Health staff,” says Samuel David Theodore, MSF’s head of mission in Sudan.  

    “Luckily, no one was injured but everyone is extremely affected by this traumatic aggression inside the hospital. Attacks against medical facilities and health personnel are unacceptable, hospitals must remain safe spaces, free from violence and intimidation. Staff cannot have their lives threatened whilst they provide care,” he says. 

    The bullet marks left by the Rapid Support Forces inside the emergency room of Bashair Teaching hospital in South Khartoum, Sudan, 19 December 2024.
    MSF

    Bashair Teaching hospital is one of the last functioning healthcare facilities in South Khartoum amidst the ongoing conflict. MSF staff have tirelessly maintained lifesaving activities under exceptionally difficult conditions.

    “Bashair Teaching hospital is a lifeline for thousands of people in South Khartoum,” says Claire San Filippo, emergency coordinator for Sudan. “MSF support is critical for countless men, women, and children affected by this devastating conflict.  However, the safety of our patients and staff is paramount. Attacks like these severely compromise our ability to continue operating.”

    Since the beginning of June 2024, MSF has conducted 12,396 emergency consultations, 2,510 patients were admitted in the maternity ward, and 4,490 children were screened for malnutrition at Bashair Teaching hospital in South Khartoum. 

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: If the EU won’t stop Israel’s genocide in Gaza, member states must go it alone

    Source: Amnesty International –

    Ursula von der Leyen knows that the EU’s reputation as a credible actor for human rights and international law is in tatters over the horrors in Gaza.

    EU leaders and officials have gone from privately condemning the EU’s double standards behind closed doors to publicly lamenting them. Instead of tackling these double standards however, the European Commission President rebranded them as “anti-EU narratives” and tasked the new Commissioner for the Mediterranean and foreign policy chief to elaborate a communications strategy to highlight the EU’s contribution to the region. But there are issues that even the canniest communications strategy cannot bury.

    After the atrocities committed by Hamas and other armed groups on 7 October 2023, Israel’s military campaign has killed over 45,000 Palestinians, 60% of whom are children, women and older people. The Israeli offensive has left the occupied Gaza Strip a wasteland, inflicting shocking and unprecedented levels of death, suffering and destruction. Amnesty International investigated Israel’s offensive on Gaza, examining a variety of unlawful acts constituting a pattern of conduct, the harmful and destructive impact of its policies and actions, and Israeli government and military officials’ racist, dehumanizing and genocidal rhetoric.

    The conclusion is clear: Israel is committing these acts with the intent to destroy the Palestinians in Gaza. Israel is committing genocide. We also found that not only is the genocide in Gaza the most documented in history, but the EU and many of its member states are failing to prevent it. Moreover, some member states risk becoming complicit in Israel’s genocide by continuing to transfer arms to the country.

    ‘All signs of genocide are flashing red’

    Amnesty International’s report You Feel Like You Are Subhuman’: Israel’s Genocide Against Palestinians in Gaza is the culmination of nine months of meticulous research and spans 296 pages. During our investigation, we interviewed 212 people, conducted extensive fieldwork and analyzed a wide range of visual and digital evidence, including satellite imagery. Crucially, we also analyzed evidence of Israel’s intent, before concluding that Israel has committed — and is continuing to commit — genocide in Gaza.

    In 15 airstrikes we found that Israel killed 334 civilians, including 141 children, and wounded hundreds of others in direct attacks against civilians and without effective warnings. These airstrikes represent a subset of a wider pattern of deliberately indiscriminate attacks. We also documented how Israel has deliberately imposed conditions of life on Palestinians in Gaza calculated to bring about their physical destruction. Within the context of Israel’s long-standing apartheid and unlawful occupation, the inescapable conclusion is that Israel committed these acts with the intent of destroying the Palestinians in Gaza.

    Unsurprisingly, the world has been reluctant to recognize the situation in Gaza as genocide. After all, if what we have been witnessing every day for 14 months was indeed genocide, what would that say about the international community?

    The International Court of Justice (ICJ) recognized that a risk exists that genocide could be committed against Palestinians in Gaza, ordering multiple binding measures to prevent it. The International Criminal Court (ICC) further issued arrest warrants for Israel’s prime minister and former minister of defense for war crimes and crimes against humanity.

    As ICJ judge Abdulqawi Yousef put it: “All signs of genocide are flashing red.”

    Not everyone agreed with our findings. Yet  many states have reached the same conclusion before us. While others may refuse to acknowledge the reality, the EU and its member states are faced with two primary responsibilities under international law: the obligation not to aid or assist genocide and the obligation to prevent it.

    In the absence of unity, EU member states must go it alone

    As European leaders gather in Brussels for the European Council, the new HR/VP Kaja Kallas faces the daunting challenge of convincing all 27 member states to uphold these two fundamental obligations under international law.

    However, in the absence of united action at EU level, individual member states have a duty to act on their own to uphold their obligations to prevent genocide and avoid being complicit in it. In practical terms, this entails five concrete actions.

    The remaining EU member states that continue to export or allow the transfer of arms to Israel must follow the lead of those who have rightly suspended arms exports and transshipments to Israel.

    States must exert diplomatic pressure on Israel, including by publicly recognizing that Israel is committing war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide, among other violations of international law.

    States must support justice mechanisms, including by safeguarding the ICC from reprisals, supporting the court financially and politically, and publicly committing to enforcing arrest warrants issued by the ICC. Additionally, states have a responsibility to investigate and prosecute international crimes committed in Gaza under universal jurisdiction, or when suspected perpetrators or victims are dual nationals.

    For its part, the EU must not allow Israel to decimate the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) for Palestine Refugees, which remains the only lifeline for millions of Palestinians. This requires both financial and political support for the UNRWA, as well as supporting Norway’s efforts at the UN General Assembly to challenge Israel’s attempt to dismantle it.

    Finally, regardless of EU leaders’ discourse on the ‘day after’ and long-term prospects for peace, as long as Israeli settlement expansion and unlawful occupation and apartheid persist, this will remain empty rhetoric. The EU must start by implementing their legal obligations, as clarified by the ICJ, to ban trade and investments that contribute to maintaining Israel’s illegal occupation.

    In the pages of history, two groups of politicians will be remembered: those who remained silent in the face of Gaza’s genocide — and those who rose up to stop it.

    *This article was originally published on 19 December in EUobserver.

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Negosyo napamura nang husto mga produkto sa pagtanggal ng single-use plastic

    Source: Greenpeace Statement –

    Video grab from Rico Ibarra / Greenpeace

    QUEZON CITY, Philippines — Kapag sinabing “environmentally friendly” ang isang produkto, iniisip na mahal, sosyal, at pangmayaman ito nang marami. Pero ang isang negosyo, may sikreto kung bakit abot-kaya ang kanilang sustainable cleaning products — ang pagtanggal ng single-use plastic (SUP) mula sa produksyon.

    Hulyo 2022 nang magsimula ang kwento ng Sabon Express, sa layuning mahikayat ang publikong gumamit ng boteng matatagpuan na sa kanilang bahay sa tuwing bibili ng sabong panlinis. Ani Mellany Zambrano, Chief Executive Officer (CEO) ng kumpanya, talamak kasi ang bentahan ng household cleaning materials sa plastic sachet at mga boteng itatapon lang din.

    “Our campaign is towards [a] refill revolution,” sabi ni Mellany sa panayam ng Greenpeace Philippines. “So ‘yun ‘yung pangarap namin, na ‘yung mga Pilipino ay magiging responsable sa paggamit ng mga plastic na bote at mga lalagyan. Hindi ‘yung wala lang tayong pakialam na we are after convenience, na bumibili tayo, bumibili, kumukonsumo, at nagtatapon ng plastic.”

    “So ang gusto natin is bumili tayo consciously, magkonsumo tayo at maging responsable tayo na hindi tayo makadagdag sa lumalalang plastic pollution.”

    Video grab from Rico Ibarra / Greenpeace

    “Sachet country” kung ituring ng ilan ang mga bansang Third World gaya ng Pilipinas. Aabot sa 164 milyong sachet ang ginagamit sa bansa araw-araw, bagay na naiipon sa mga landfill, kanal at karagatan. Ito ay dahil sa walang-tigil na produksyon ng SUPs ng mga malalaking korporasyon at kawalan ng batas para  rito. 

    Marami rito’y pinaglagyan ng personal care (19%) o household cleaning products (17%). Hindi ito nabubulok at bumabara sa mga estero, bagay na nagpapalala sa baha tuwing may bagyo. Nadudurog lang ito hanggang sa maging microscopic. Pwede itong malanghap, mainom, o makain bilang “microplastic” na siyang nagdudulot ng pagkabaog at cancer.

    ‘Di gaya ng mararangyang bayan, limitado ang kakayahan ng mga Pinoy na bumili nang bultuhan. Dahil dito, pumatok ang konsepto ng “tingi” na siyang sinakyan ng mga dambuhalang kumpanya lalo na’t hindi ito mabigat sa bulsa. Nakapako kasi sa P645 kada araw ang minimum wage sa Metro Manila — ang pinakamataas sa buong Pilipinas — samantalang P1,205 kada araw ang kinakailangang kita ng pamilyang may limang miyembro para mabuhay nang disente.

    Plastic packaging: salarin sa mahal na produkto?

    Isa sa appeal ng plastic ay ang “mababang presyo” nito. Pero alam n’yo bang malaking bahagi ng binabayaran ng consumer sa mga produkto ay packaging?

    Karaniwang 10% hanggang 40% ng kabuuang retail price ng iyong binibili ay dahil sa lalagyan nito. Gayunpaman, dedepende ito sa uri ng packaging material na ginamit, laki at bigat ng produkto, at production process. Ito’y nasa porma ng plastic na bote, galon, sticker labels, shrink plastics o sachet na madalas itinatapon matapos ang isang gamit.

    Video grab from Rico Ibarra / Greenpeace

    Sa pagtalikod ng Sabon Express sa SUPs at pag-engganyo sa customers magdala ng sariling bote at lalagyan, nagawa tuloy nilang makapaglabas ng produktong mas mura kaysa sa mga ibinebenta sa malls at supermarkets. 

    “Every time na bumibili kayo ng inyong mga produkto na gumagamit ng mga single-use plastics… at itinatapon niyo, hindi lang kayo nakakadagdag sa polusyon kundi actually nagsasayang po kayo ng pera,” prangkahang pagbabahagi ni Mellany.

    “Kami po as manufacturer, ito po ay tapat na sinasabi namin sa inyo. Kayo po actually ay nagsasayang ng minimum 30% to a maximum of 70% [ng presyo ng produkto] sa packaging na itinatapon ninyo… So, imagine ninyo po ‘yung mase-save po ninyo [oras na umiwas kayo rito] at imagine din po ninyo yung perang itinatapon ninyo every time po nagpa-patronize kayo yung single-use plastic.”

    Sa halagang P20, makabibili ka na ng 400 milliliters na dishwashing liquid sa Sabon Express. Ang kailangan mo lang gawin, magdala ng sariling bote o lalagyang ire-refill. Malayo ang presyo nito kumpara sa mahigit-kumulang P100 halagang dishwashing liquid (355 ml sachet refill pack) na mabibili gaya ng kilalang brand na Joy.

    Video grab from Rico Ibarra / Greenpeace

    Ang Sabon Express ay isang case study ng University of Portsmouth sa United Kingdom bilang bahagi ng research at campaign nito sa pagbubuo ng isang Global Plastics Treaty. Una nang sinabi ni Mellany na naging katuwang nila ang Department of Science and Technology (DOST) sa pagtitimpla ng kanilang mga produkto.

    Gayunpaman, aminado si Mellany na wala pang insentibo mula sa gobyerno para itulak ang mga negosyong maging plastic-free. Malaki raw sana ang magagawa ng pagpapababa ng buwis para mga negosyong gaya ng kanila para maeengganyo ang iba pa. Bukod pa rito, mainam daw kung mapapadali ang pagproproseso ng business permits atbp. dokumento.

    ‘Kulturang tingi’ pwede palang eco-friendly

    Isa ang kulturang “tingi” ng mga Pilipino — o pagbili ng mga produkto sa maliitang sukat — sa isinisisi ng ilan sa pamamayagpag ng mga plastic sachet atbp. SUPs sa bansa. Pero alam n’yo bang environmentally-sustainable ang pinagmulan nito bago i-hijack ng mga korporasyon gamit ang mga plastic na pakete? 

    Tradisyunal na nagdadala ng kani-kanilang mga bote, garapon at bayong ang mga Pinoy noon sa mga palengke at sari-sari store na siya nilang pinupuno ng produkto sa tuwing bibili. Ang “reuse and refill” practice na ito ang nais ibalik ng mga negosyo gaya ng Sabon Express, bagay na kanilang minomodernisa sa pamamagitan ng mga makabagong kagamitan.

    Kaugnay nito, nagdisenyo sila ng mga agaw-pansing vendo machines para mapadali ang proseso ng refilling sa kanilang mga tindahan. Hindi inumin o pagkain ang iniluluwa nito kundi dishwashing liquid, fabric conditioner, liquid detergent at hand soap. Puwede itong sahurin gamit ang mga lalagyang dala ng customer kontra plastic pollution.

    Tumatanggap ang kanilang mga makina ng P5, P10, at P20 barya.

    Video grab from Rico Ibarra / Greenpeace

    “Our dream is to be visible in all supermarkets, convenience stores, public markets, grocery stores,” patuloy ni Mellany. 

    “Pangarap po namin na laging merong Sabon Express dispensing machines or vendo machines na makakapag-offer ng murang produkto para sa mga Pilipino, para sa mga consumers na magdadala ng sarili nilang [containers]… para mabigyan po ng pagkakataon ‘yung lahat ng Pilipino na makabili ng produkto na high quality pero very affordable.” 

    ‘Plastics Treaty’ at insentibo sa sustainable MSMEs

    Bahagi ang Sabon Express, sampu ng iba pang progresibong negosyo, sa lumalawak na koalisyong Champions of Change. Layon nitong pagbuklurin ang mga Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSME) atbp. negosyong lumalaban sa krisis ng SUPs. Nabuo ito sa inisyatiba ng Greenpeace International, Plastic Pollution Coalition and the Break Free From Plastic.  

    Lumaki ang grupo sa hanay ng mga entrepreneur habang hindi pa rin napagkakaisahan ng mga kasapi ng United Nations ang isang Global Plastics Treaty. Itinutulak dito ng Greenpeace ang hindi bababa sa 75% na pagbabawas sa produksyon ng plastic kasabay ng SUP bans. 

    Ayon kay Mellany, malaki ang maitutulong ng isang malakas na tratado sa pagsugpo ng plastic pollution para makapagbalangkas ng polisya ang mga bansang aayon at raratipika rito.

    “A more concrete [example of this would be] sana… ma-incentivize ‘yung mga MSMEs na kagaya namin at magkaroon ng solid support ng government sa mga negosyo [na plastic-free],” paliwanag niya nang matanong kung ano ang nais niyang makita sa kasunduan.

    Video grab from Rico Ibarra / Greenpeace

    Dagdag pa niya, responsibilidad ng mga negosyong maging kampeon ng kalikasan upang matiyak na malinis at mapakikinabangan ito ng mga susunod na henerasyon. Aniya, walang “satellite Earth” na malilikasan ang mga tao kung saka-sakaling tumindi ang krisis.

    Napipintong plantsahin ng huling pagpupulong ng Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee (INC) ang isang Global Plastics Treaty sa darating na 2025. Nananawagan ang Greenpeace Philippines sa UN member states na pagkaisahan ang isang tratadong magtitiyak ng karapatan sa kalusugan at ligtas na kapaligiran habang hinihikayat ang publikong suportahan ang mga negosyong tumatalikod sa plastic wala pa mang kasunduan. 

    Pumirma rito para ipakita ang suporta.

    ###

    Support a strong Plastics Treaty!

    Help build a plastic-free future.

    SIGN THE PETITION

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Mozambique: End violent post-election crackdown ahead of 7 November Maputo march

    Source: Amnesty International –

    Ahead of a major opposition march planned for 7 November in Maputo following disputed elections, Mozambique’s Frelimo-led government must halt its violent and widespread crackdown on human rights and respect everyone’s rights to freedom of expression, peaceful assembly and association, Amnesty International said. 

    The crisis in Mozambique is the country’s worst crackdown on protests in years. Police have killed more than 20 people and injured or arrested hundreds more, according to civil society. Security forces have routinely tried to violently and unlawfully break up peaceful assemblies with tear gas, bullets and arbitrary arrests. Authorities say protesters killed at least one police officer. 

    “The last two weeks in Mozambique have been marked by completely unnecessary bloodshed as authorities have tried to stop a peaceful protest movement with deadly force. The number of casualties increases every day, with authorities deploying weapons of war, including rifles and armoured vehicles, on city streets. People cannot even protest in their own homes without risking tear gassing by police,” said Khanyo Farise, Amnesty International’s Deputy Regional Director for East and Southern Africa. 

    The government has repeatedly cut internet access across the country and blocked social media sites for nearly a week. Unknown gunmen assassinated two leading opposition figures, and opposition leader Venancio Mondlane is in hiding

    Mozambique’s government has the primary responsibility to respect and uphold human rights, but neighboring countries and international organizations, including the Southern African Development Community and the African Union, must forcefully speak out now to prevent further unlawful killings and other human rights violations. 

    “This outrageous chapter in Mozambique’s history must end now, and perpetrators must be brought to justice. Mozambique’s government must pull back from the brink to avert further human rights violations,” said Khanyo Farise. 

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Write for Rights: Amnesty launches annual letter-writing campaign to help people imprisoned for speaking truth to power

    Source: Amnesty International –

    Amnesty International launches flagship Write for Rights campaign to help people facing human rights abuses around the world

    Millions of letters and emails will be sent to support these individuals and urge authorities to end injustices

    ‘Sending a letter or email might seem like a small act, but when sent in their thousands they can change lives: those in power are forced to take notice’ – Sacha Deshmukh

    Amnesty International is calling on people across the UK to take part in its flagship letter writing campaign, Write for Rights, in support of individuals from around the world who have been persecuted, jailed, or face human rights abuses for standing up for their rights.

    This year, Write for Rights will support nine individuals who are suffering abuses, including:

    Ana da Silva Miguel, also known as Neth Nahara, was arrested in August last year after broadcasting a video on TikTok criticising President João Lourenço. The next day, Angola’s first stage court convicted her of an “outrage against the state, its symbols and bodies”. She was sentenced to six months in prison and fined one million kwanza (approximately $1,200). Last September, Angola’s second stage court extended Neth’s sentence to two years, following an appeal by the public prosecutor. During her imprisonment, authorities denied Neth her daily HIV medication for eight months, which severely impacted her health.

    Oqba Hashad, an Egyptian business student, has been arbitrarily detained for nearly five years without trial solely because of his brother’s human rights activism. Despite a court order for his release, he remains detained in horrific conditions, including being denied a proper prosthetic leg. Prison authorities have interrogated Oqba on multiple occasions about his brother’s activism and contact with his family. Egypt, as a state party to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, must ensure detainees with disabilities are provided reasonable accommodation and health services.

    Professor Şebnem Korur Fincancı, head of the Turkish Medical Association, faces more than seven years in prison because of her human rights work. Professor Fincancı is a prominent human rights defender, anti-torture advocate and forensic medicine expert. In October 2022, she was arrested and put in pre-trial detention. A criminal investigation was launched against her after she called for an independent investigation into allegations that Turkish armed forces might have used chemical weapons in Kurdistan Region of Iraq in comments during a live TV interview. Professor Fincancı was later convicted of trumped-up charges of “making propaganda for a terrorist organisation”. She is currently awaiting the result of an appeal, but also faces additional charges linked to her human rights work.

    Sacha Deshmukh, Chief Executive of Amnesty International UK, said:

    “The people we have focused on this year are all imprisoned because the governments of their countries value power over free speech. By joining this campaign, people in the UK – and indeed around the world – can help improve their chances of getting justice.

    “Sending a letter or email might seem like a small act, but when sent in their thousands they can change lives: those in power are forced to take notice. 

    “Amnesty’s Write for Rights campaign helps to protect the lives of persecuted people every year. We hope to see people across the country getting involved to make as much noise as possible about the injustices these human rights defenders are facing.”

    Amnesty International’s Write for Rights campaign goes back to the roots of the organisation, which was founded in 1961, with early campaigners writing letters of support to those affected by human rights abuses, as well as letters of concern to governments around the world.

    Successes from previous Write for Rights campaigns:

    Human rights defender Rita Karasartova was arrested in 2022 along with 26 others for opposing a new border agreement that gave control of a freshwater reservoir to Uzbekistan. She was initially detained for organising ‘mass disorder’ and later charged with attempting to ‘violently overthrow the Government’, which carries a potential 15-year sentence. Rita and at least 21 others were acquitted on 14 June this year: a significant victory for justice and human rights in Kyrgyzstan, even though the prosecutor has filed an appeal against the ruling.

    She subsequently expressed her gratitude for the countless letters she received from Amnesty supporters during the campaign, emphasising that each one gave her immense hope and strength, reinforcing her belief in the power of solidarity.

    In 2021, Amnesty campaigned for Egyptian human rights lawyer Mohamed Baker, who received a presidential pardon in July last year and was released from prison the following day. He is now safely reunited with his loved ones.

    Cecillia Chimbiri and Joanah Mamombe were acquitted by the Zimbabwean High Court in July 2023 of communicating falsehoods and obstructing the course of justice. The two – together with Netsai Marova, who did not face trial as she is out of the country – were arrested and abducted in May 2020 following a protest on the Government’s failure to provide social protection during the Covid 19 pandemic. Amnesty campaigned for them during the 2022 Write for Rights campaign.

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Türkiye: Proposed ‘agents of influence’ law is attack on civil society and must be rejected   

    Source: Amnesty International –

    Türkiye’s parliament must reject the draft amendment to the country’s ‘espionage’ laws which, if passed, would significantly threaten the ability of civil society organizations to operate freely within the country, said more than 80 organizations ahead of an expected vote in parliament. Scores of other organizations issued similar statements, calling on the legislators to reject the proposal.  

    If passed, this law would represent a significant threat to the ability of civil society to operate freely within the country 

    If approved, the new article – publicly referred to as the “agents of influence” law – would amend the penal code and criminalize unspecified “acts” that are “in line with the strategic interests or instructions of a foreign state or organization against the security or domestic or foreign political interests of the State in line with the strategic interests or instructions of a foreign state or organization.”

    “If passed, this law would represent a significant threat to the ability of civil society to operate freely within the country,” the civil society organizations said in a joint statement.

    The signatories point at the fact that the draft law fails the test of legal certainty and foreseeability, a fundamental tenet of law – meaning that articles of law must be understandable and predictable by the relevant people; individuals must be able to foresee which acts or omissions will make them criminally liable and what punishment will be applied for the act or omission committed.

    The proposed legislative package, passed by the Parliamentary Justice Commission on 23 October, is expected to be voted on by members of the Turkish Parliament in the coming days. 

    The draft law threatens to criminalize legitimate activities such as the documentation of human rights violations by state or non-state actors, imposing heavy penalties including lengthy prison terms for anyone found to have breached the same. If these so-called offenses are committed during “wartime” or in relation to the “state’s preparation for or war activities or military operations”, the penalty could be between eight to 12 years imprisonment.  

    If the provision is adopted, the rights to freedom of expression of all, including seeking and receiving information, would be also at risk of being violated

    “We are also concerned that the proposed law fails to set out clear criteria for what specific acts constitute a criminal offence without adequate safeguards or effective remedies against potential abuses of the law,” said the organizations. 

    “Arbitrary interpretation of broadly worded, vague laws are used to target and prosecute human rights defenders, journalists, lawyers and many other civil society organizations in Türkiye. If the provision is adopted, the rights to freedom of expression of all, including seeking and receiving information, would be also at risk of being violated. It would create a chilling effect on important human rights work, and potentially impede their activities.” 

    Background 

    The legislative package proposes to add a new penalty, Article 339/A “Committing offenses against the security or political interests of the state” under the seventh section, “Crimes Against State Secrets and Espionage,” of the Turkish Penal Code (Law No. 5237).  

    Terminology in the proposed article is vulnerable to abuse. For example, “strategic interests,” “instructions,” “organization,” and “domestic or foreign political interests of the State” are overly broad and vague. Ill-defined or overly broad laws can be susceptible to arbitrary application and abuse, thus risk being instrumentalized to target people that the state authorities consider dissenting or criminalize the legitimate activities of civil society organizations, such as those documenting human rights violations in the country.  

    The proposed article is in violation of international human rights law and standards as well as Türkiye’s Constitution and national laws as it threatens freedom of expression and violates the principle of legality which includes the principle of foreseeability, a fundamental concept of criminal law. 

    As well as the signatories to this statement, numerous other organizations have published their own statements including the Association of Civil Society Development Center (see here), the Women’s Platform for Equality (see here), the Third Sector Foundation of Turkiye (see here), the International Press Institute (see here), the Committee to Protect Journalists (see here), Human Rights Watch (see  here), journalism organisations, trade unions and others (see here).

    For more information, please contact [email protected] in London or [email protected] in Istanbul 

    The number of signatories to the joint statement is increasingly daily. A copy of the statement is being sent to all Turkish MPs.

    SIGNATORIES
    1. About Life Foundation (YADA) 
    2. AG-DA Gender Equality Solidarity Network 
    3. Ali İsmail Korkmaz Foundation 
    4. Altyazı Cinema Association 
    5. Amnesty International Türkiye 
    6. Ankara Initiative for Freedom of Thought 
    7. Ankara Solidarity Academy 
    8. Another School is Possible Association 
    9. Association for Monitoring Equal Rights 
    10. Batman Bar Association 
    11. Bodrum Women’s Solidarity Association 
    12. Center for Spatial Justice 
    13. Citizen’s Initiative 
    14. Citizens’ Assembly 
    15. DEMOS Research Association 
    16. Dersim Bar Association 
    17. Diyarbakır Bar Association 
    18. Families of LGBTs in İstanbul 
    19. Free Colors Association 
    20. GALADER-Ankara Rainbow Families Association 
    21. Green Thought Association 
    22. Hakkari Bar Association 
    23. Human Rights Agenda Association 
    24. Human Rights Association 
    25. Human Rights Association Ankara Branch LGBTI+ Commission 
    26. Human Rights Association Istanbul Branch 
    27. Human Rights Foundation of Türkiye 
    28. Izmir Women’s Solidarity Association 
    29. Kaos GL Association 
    30. Katre Women’s Counceling and Solidarity Association 
    31. Kirkayak Culture – Migration and Cultural Studies Center 
    32. Kuşadası Caferli Beautification and Solidarity Association 
    33. Lambdaistanbul LGBT Solidarity Association 
    34. Lawyers for Freedom Association 
    35. Leader Women Association 
    36. Life Memory Freedom Association 
    37. Mardin Bar Association 
    38. Marmaris Public Assembly 
    39. May 17 Association 
    40. Media and Law Studies Association 
    41. Merdiven Social Initiative and Development Association 
    42. Migration Monitoring Association 
    43. Muamma LGBTI+ Education Research and Solidarity Association 
    44. Muğla Environment Platform 
    45. Murat Çekiç Association 
    46. Muş Bar Association 
    47. Natural Life Association 
    48. Nonviolence Education and Research Center 
    49. P24 Independent Journalism Platform 
    50. Press, Publishing, Communication, and Postal Workers’ Union 
    51. Pride Istanbul 
    52. Progressive Journalists Association 
    53. Red Umbrella Sexual Health and Human Rights Association 
    54. Rights Initiative Association 
    55. Romani Godi – Association for Roma Memory Studies 
    56. Rosa Women’s Association 
    57. SES Equality and Solidarity Association 
    58. Siirt Bar Association 
    59. Social Policy, Gender Identity and Sexual Orientation Studies Association 
    60. Support for Improvement in Social and Economic Living Association 
    61. Şanlıurfa Bar Association 
    62. Şırnak Bar Association 
    63. Tarlabaşı Community Support Association 
    64. The Civil Society in the Penal System Association 
    65. The Confederation of Public Employees’ Trade Unions 
    66. Trans Pride Istanbul 
    67. Truth Justice Memory Center 
    68. Turkish Handicap Association 
    69. Türkiye Human Rights Litigation Support Project 
    70. Türkiye Journalists’ Union 
    71. Türkiye Press, Publishing, and Printing Employees’ Union 
    72. University Queer Studies and LGBTI+ Solidarity Association 
    73. Van Bar Association 
    74. Velvele 
    75. Women for Women’s Human Rights Association 
    76. Women’s Culture, Arts, and Literature Association 
    77. Women’s Solidarity Foundation 
    78. Women’s Time Association 
    79. Young Thought Institute 
    80. Youth Organizations Forum 
    81. Yuva Association  

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Seeking refuge from Israeli bombardment in Baalbek Lebanon

    Source: Médecins Sans Frontières –

    On 23 September, after nearly one year of cross-border attacks along Lebanon’s southern border, Israel escalated its bombardment of Lebanon, causing waves of mass displacement that have surpassed the country’s ability to provide adequate shelter.

    On 1 November, our team met women sheltering at a school with their families in Bichwet, Baalbek-Hermel governorate.

    Fatima’s vibrant smile slowly fades away after entering the classroom. Desks and chairs are stacked on one side of the room, making room for the mattresses laid out on the floor. She’d rather be at a school to seek education for her three children, not to seek refuge.

    “I didn’t want to leave our home, I really didn’t,” says Fatima, who is 43 years old. “The day we were forced to leave was the toughest day.” 

    On 29 September, Fatima quickly collected a couple of mattresses and blankets and headed out of the house under the bombing. Some five minutes later, her neighbour’s house in Kfarden was bombed.

    “I am grateful I saved my children,” she says. “My husband and I live for them. We’re well physically, but not at all mentally. We muster patience and wait for the war to end.”

    Fatima wipes her tears and puts a coffee pot on a portable stove. Her vibrant smile returns as she says, “We are the people of Baalbek, we honour our guests, with whatever means available.”

    Iqbal knocks on the door and enters. The 60-year-old woman was forced to leave her town, Boudai, and arrived at the school on the same day as Fatima.

    “We couldn’t sleep all night because of the constant bombing all around us,” says Iqbal. “When the sun came up, we fled with nothing. We didn’t even know where we’re going, we just ran for our lives.”

    Iqbal managed to get a few mattresses and blankets for herself, her father, and her three siblings.

    “We know nothing about our house,” she says. “I miss home so much, and the things I took for granted before. It’s dangerous to go back home; it’s undignified to stay here.”

    As they’re sipping coffee, their chats are filled with a shared sense of nostalgia for the recent past. Fatima does something that Iqbal hasn’t dared though; she risks her life every few days to go back home.

    “There are no showers in this school and the weather is freezing here in the mountains,” says Fatima. “We can’t afford to heat up water on the stove. We also can’t afford to have our children get sick. I have succumbed to the fact that this is our life now.”

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Oxfam reaction to Israel’s banning of UNRWA

    Source: Oxfam –

    In reaction to the Knesset passing bills banning UNRWA from operating in areas under Israel’s control, Sally Abi Khalil, Oxfam Regional Director in the Middle East and North Africa said: 

    “Israel has bombed Palestinians to death, maimed them, starved them, and is now ridding them of their biggest lifeline of aid. Piece by piece, Israel is systemically dismantling Gaza as a land that is autonomous and liveable for Palestinians. Its banning of UNRWA today is condemnable and another step in this crime. 

    “The decision will further undermine the ability of the international community to provide sufficient humanitarian aid and to save lives in any safe, independent and impartial way.  

    “UNRWA was not only the biggest and most established agency that has been delivering aid and sustenance to the people of Gaza for years, it was also a thread that connected them in some hope of solidarity and security to the United Nations.  

    “We are in no doubt that Israel and its allies are fully aware of the terrible consequences that this decision will have on Palestinians living in Gaza, many of whom are already starving. We join others in warning again that this will result in more death, more suffering, and more forced displacement of people from their besieged homeland. It is impossible not to believe that this is their aim.” 

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Africa: Richer countries must commit to pay at COP29 as climate change forcibly displaces millions across Africa

    Source: Amnesty International –

    With millions of people already displaced by climate change disasters in Africa, the richer countries most responsible for global warming must agree at the COP29 climate conference in Baku, Azerbaijan to fully pay for the catastrophic loss of homes and damage to livelihoods taking place across the continent, Amnesty International said. They must also fully fund African governments’ adaptation measures to prevent further forced displacement, stop human rights violations and help them achieve a fast and fair phaseout of fossil fuel production and use. 

    These same countries must then follow up on their agreement by urgently financing the Fund for responding to Loss and Damage, the main international fund addressing climate change’s unavoidable harms. So far, such countries have pledged less than USD 700 million of the 400 billion dollars that lower-income countries estimate they need for loss and damage by 2030. Meanwhile, adaptation may cost USD 30 to 50 billion per year in sub-Saharan Africa alone. International financial institutions must ensure equitable distribution of the money to African countries based on need. 

    African people have contributed the least to climate change, yet from Somalia to Senegal, Chad to Madagascar, we are suffering a terrible toll of this global emergency.

    Samira Daoud, Amnesty International Regional Director for West and Central Africa

    “African people have contributed the least to climate change, yet from Somalia to Senegal, Chad to Madagascar, we are suffering a terrible toll of this global emergency which has driven millions of people from their homes. It’s time for the countries who caused all this devastation to pay up so African people can adapt to the climate change catastrophe,” said Samira Daoud, Amnesty International Regional Director for West and Central Africa. 

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: COP29: What you need to know about the global climate summit

    Source: Amnesty International –

    The 2024 United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP29) opens next week in Baku, the capital of Azerbaijan. The summit takes place between 11 and 22 November, and decisions made there will impact all of us. To date, the international community has failed to rein in the deadly activities of the fossil fuel industry, which continues to pollute, burn, and ransack the planet in the face of mounting human suffering.

    COP29 is a critical opportunity for world leaders to break with these past failures. Here’s what you need to know about the most important climate event on the global calendar: 

    1. Who’s going? 

      Between 40,000 and 50,000 delegates are expected to attend COP29. This will include government representatives from all UN member states, as well as the State of Palestine, the Holy See, Niue, the Cook Islands, and the European Union. All of these are parties to the 1992 United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), and most have also joined the 2015 Paris Climate Agreement. COP29 will also host diplomats, UN officials, journalists, climate scientists, trade union leaders, and policy experts. NGOs, activists, and Indigenous leaders are also planning to participate – although the involvement of independent media workers and human rights defenders from Azerbaijan itself has been curbed by an ongoing government crackdown.   

      2. What is the aim of COP29? 

        The overall aim of COP29 is for states to agree, develop and share plans for addressing climate change. This means preventing further global warming, and also helping those who have been most affected so far to adapt or to rebuild their lives.  

        In 2015, the Paris Agreement made it a legal requirement for all states to set targets for reducing their greenhouse gas emissions, in order to limit the global temperature increase to 2°C above pre-industrial levels. Since then, however, the Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change (IPCC) has stressed that the most catastrophic effects of climate change can only be avoided if we limit global warming to 1.5°C by the end of this century.   

        At COP29, countries’ progress on addressing climate change will be measured against this 1.5°C goal. It is important to note that even 1.5°C of warming will entail mass displacement, harm to livelihoods, and loss of life, with lower-income countries the worst affected. At present, the world is on track for an increase of 2.6 to 3.1°C this century.

        3. What’s on the agenda this year?  

          COP29 has been called “the finance COP”, due to its focus on scaling up climate finance. Climate finance refers to the funding that is needed to help lower-income countries transition to zero-carbon economies, and to help the most affected communities adapt to the effects of climate change. A major objective of COP29 is to increase this funding and to produce a new goal for future climate finance.  

          4. Where will that money come from? 

          Under the UNFCCC and the Paris Agreement, the funding must come from the high-income countries that are historically most responsible for climate change. In addition, under international human rights law, all states in a position to do so must also contribute.  

          In addition to setting a financial target, COP29 negotiators must also agree clear timeframes for the provision of funds to lower-income countries. Money should be given in the form of grants, not loans, to avoid worsening existing debt crises.  

          5. What should the funds be used for? 

            This target should also contain sub-goals to make clear where the money should go. For example,  Amnesty International is also calling for the target to include loss and damage finance. This is essentially compensation, paid by high-income countries to lower income ones, to help them recover from the existing impacts of climate change, and from others that they will unavoidably face in the future.  

            One of the Azerbaijan presidency’s more positive moves has been to make adaptation, long sidelined in climate negotiations, a priority of the talks. While preventing further climate change through a full, fast fair and funded phase -out of fossil fuels is critical, the reality is that climate change is already here. Helping people adjust to existing and future impacts of global warming is a crucial part of climate justice.   

            6. How much money is needed? 

              Trillions of dollars are needed to help lower-income states carry out the climate action needed, including transitioning away from fossil fuels in a way that protects peoples’ rights. Amnesty International and others in the climate justice movement are calling for a target of at least 1 trillion USD annually.  

              Azerbaijan has an alarming human rights record, with longstanding restrictions on the rights to freedom of expression, association and assembly.

              7. What are Amnesty’s human rights concerns regarding Azerbaijan? 

                Azerbaijan has an alarming human rights record, with longstanding restrictions on the rights to freedom of expression, association and assembly. Peaceful protests, including those held by environmental groups, are routinely met with violent suppression, and according to the local NGOs more than 300 people are currently imprisoned on politically motivated charges. The work of independent media outlets in Azerbaijan is severely hampered by draconian laws, and the constant threat of retaliation for any real or perceived criticism of the authorities. Most independent media outlets have been crushed out of existence, as have vast swathes of Azerbaijan’s civil society. Torture and other ill-treatment in detention are widespread in Azerbaijan, and impunity is entrenched. 

                8. Have there been any improvements since Azerbaijan was given the COP29 Presidency? 

                  No. In fact, the grave human rights situation in Azerbaijan has worsened since the country was announced as the host of COP29 in December 2023. The authorities claim they are “ensuring everyone’s voices are heard” at the summit – but they have prosecuted more than a dozen activists and journalists this year, and silenced key voices on the climate crisis.  

                  In April, for example, Azerbaijani authorities arrested human rights and climate justice activist Anar Mammadli on bogus “smuggling” charges, and placed him in pre-trial detention, where he remains. Anar Mammadli was among the first activists in Azerbaijan to speak about the connection between human rights and climate justice, and he has been involved in international advocacy at the EU and UN level. In prison he has been denied adequate medical treatment for several worsening health conditions, and he is facing a lengthy sentence.  

                  9. How does the human rights situation in Azerbaijan affect COP29? 

                    It is essential that civil society can participate in climate negotiations. Activists, union leaders, and human rights defenders help to advocate for ambitious targets and play a vital role in ensuring that the plans developed at COP29 align with governments’ human rights obligations and that they are actually implemented. But the involvement of Azerbaijan’s own civil society is likely to be extremely limited. Threats and harassment have forced many local activists to leave the country, while others are arbitrarily detained on politically motivated charges. The few remaining independent voices risk prosecution and retaliation if they dare to voice any criticism during COP29. 

                    The void left by local civil society groups has been filled in part by organizations known as GONGOs (government-organized non-governmental organizations). These state-supported groups do not provide the independent perspectives needed, but their presence allows Azerbaijani authorities to project a false picture of respect for freedom of expression and association.  

                    Amnesty International is monitoring the crackdown in Azerbaijan, and will continue to document violations, both during and after the summit.

                    10 .What about Azerbaijan’s record on climate change?

                      Fossil fuel makes up about half of Azerbaijan’s economy and the vast majority of its export revenues. The state-owned oil and gas company, SOCAR, is a major source of income for President Ilham Aliyev’s government. Nonetheless, Azerbaijan must also do its fair share to achieve a fast and fair fossil fuel phase out; this means no new fossil fuel projects anywhere. But earlier this year, President Aliyev announced plans for expanding gas production which are grossly incompatible with Azerbaijan’s commitments under the Paris Agreement.  

                      Like previous climate summits, COP29 will host many participants whose agendas are seriously at odds with climate justice. Thousands of fossil fuel lobbyists, along with the heads of oil giants like Shell and BP, are expected to be in attendance. These participants have used previous summits to advance their own interests, opposing essential efforts to phase out fossil fuels and pushing for false solutions like carbon offsetting. Amnesty International is calling for a robust conflict of interest policy to prevent fossil fuel lobbyists undermining the aims of global climate treaties. 

                      11. How has climate change impacted people in 2024? 

                        Climate change is causing a dramatic increase in the frequency of extreme temperatures, and 2024 is expected to be the hottest year ever recorded. Around the world, people have been displaced by floods, hurricanes, droughts and other unnatural disasters, all made worse by global warming. Worldwide, Indigenous Peoples and land-dependent communities continue to bear the heaviest burden of biodiversity loss.  

                        Lives have been lost; livelihoods, languages, and entire cultures are in peril; and disease, hunger and displacement is causing extreme suffering. The cost of these losses amounts to trillions of dollars in damages, which dwarf the cost of current investments in renewable energy, and threaten governments’ capacity to fund policies to protect human rights.

                        12. What is Amnesty calling for at COP29? 

                          • Human rights must be at the heart of all climate action decision-making;
                          • States in a position to do so must massively scale up climate finance and funding for loss and damage;
                          • All states must commit to fully phasing out fossil fuels, in a way that is fast and fair;
                          • COP29 participants must not chase risky technologies, like carbon capture and storage and removals, or push gas as a “transition fuel”, as a means of distracting from the urgent need to phase out fossil fuels;
                          • The UNFCCC Secretariat, the government of Azerbaijan, and other governments must protect civic space, and guarantee the rights to freedom of expression, association and peaceful assembly.   

                          Read more of Amnesty International’s recommendations on climate justice here

                          Help protect the protest in Azerbaijan

                          MIL OSI NGO

                        1. MIL-OSI NGOs: Amnesty demands Northern Ireland political leaders to speak up against China’s brutal suppression of human rights

                          Source: Amnesty International –

                          Northern Ireland’s political leaders should use their voices to challenge China’s human rights abuses.

                          That’s the call from Patrick Corrigan, Amnesty International’s Northern Ireland Director, ahead of a special film screening in Belfast on Saturday which tells the story of China’s persecution of the minority Muslim Uyghur community in the country’s Xinjiang region.

                           Patrick Corrigan, Northern Ireland Director of Amnesty International, said:

                          “Stormont Ministers regularly meet with Chinese government representatives, yet consistently fail to raise human rights concerns despite being fully aware of the atrocious record of abuses by the Chinese authorities.

                          “This includes the mass internment and torture of the Uyghur population. An estimated one million members of the Muslim community have been detained in camps and prisons in Xinjiang, northwest China.

                          “Our political leaders have a responsibility to speak up about this when they have the opportunity of Chinese government officials sitting in front of them.”

                          Amnesty recently revealed that the First and deputy First Minister failed to raise any concerns over China’s human rights record when they met the Chinese ambassador at Stormont Castle in May this year.

                          Corrigan was speaking ahead of the Northern Ireland premiere of documentary film All Static & Noise, which explores ongoing atrocities in China and tells the story of Ilham Tohti, an economist now serving the tenth year of a life sentence in prison for his peaceful work bringing Uyghur and Han people together in dialogue.

                          The film screening will take place at 3pm on Saturday 2 November at The MAC, followed by a panel discussion featuring the film’s director David Novack, Amnesty’s Patrick Corrigan and Clive Corry, of the Action Trauma Network. This event is free but reservations are required here.

                          View latest press releases

                          MIL OSI NGO

                        2. MIL-OSI NGOs: Amnesty urges Northern Ireland political leaders to speak up against China’s brutal suppression of human rights

                          Source: Amnesty International –

                          Northern Ireland’s political leaders should use their voices to challenge China’s human rights abuses.

                          That’s the call from Patrick Corrigan, Amnesty International’s Northern Ireland Director, ahead of a special film screening in Belfast on Saturday which tells the story of China’s persecution of the minority Muslim Uyghur community in the country’s Xinjiang region.

                           Patrick Corrigan, Northern Ireland Director of Amnesty International, said:

                          “Stormont Ministers regularly meet with Chinese government representatives, yet consistently fail to raise human rights concerns despite being fully aware of the atrocious record of abuses by the Chinese authorities.

                          “This includes the mass internment and torture of the Uyghur population. An estimated one million members of the Muslim community have been detained in camps and prisons in Xinjiang, northwest China.

                          “Our political leaders have a responsibility to speak up about this when they have the opportunity of Chinese government officials sitting in front of them.”

                          Amnesty recently revealed that the First and deputy First Minister failed to raise any concerns over China’s human rights record when they met the Chinese ambassador at Stormont Castle in May this year.

                          Corrigan was speaking ahead of the Northern Ireland premiere of documentary film All Static & Noise, which explores ongoing atrocities in China and tells the story of Ilham Tohti, an economist now serving the tenth year of a life sentence in prison for his peaceful work bringing Uyghur and Han people together in dialogue.

                          The film screening will take place at 3pm on Saturday 2 November at The MAC, followed by a panel discussion featuring the film’s director David Novack, Amnesty’s Patrick Corrigan and Clive Corry, of the Action Trauma Network. This event is free but reservations are required here.

                          View latest press releases

                          MIL OSI NGO

                        3. MIL-OSI NGOs: DRC: 3 questions on the intensification of the armed conflict in North and South Kivu

                          Source: Médecins Sans Frontières –

                          What is the current situation in North and South Kivu with regards to this crisis?

                          Since December 2024, several fronts have been opened in the two provinces to control certain key positions. In Lubero territory, in North Kivu, the conflict resumed in December with massive population displacement. It continued in Masisi territory, where intense fighting took place in January 2025, particularly for control of the town of Masisi Centre, before moving down towards South Kivu, to Minova and Numbi in Kalehe territory.

                          During the hostilities, the M23/AFC managed to take control of several towns. In recent days the fighting has moved closer to the provincial capital of Goma, with intense clashes in Sake, just 20 kilometres from the city. Artillery explosions can be heard regularly from Goma. Fighting is taking place on all the roads around Goma and has led to a new influx of displaced people into the city, including from some camps on the outskirts of the city where people flee towards Goma, in a situation of panic.

                          How is this situation affecting the population?

                          Unsurprisingly, the humanitarian consequences for the population are very serious. Hundreds of thousands of people have once again fled the fighting. According to the United Nations, 400,000 people have already fled since January. Tens of thousands headed for displacement sites around Goma, where more than 650,000 people were already living, exhausted by almost three years of fighting. The clashes in recent weeks have led to a new influx of people into these completely unhygienic sites where – as we have been saying for far too long – families are surviving without proper shelter and lacking everything: food, water, health care, etc.

                          Unfortunately, these sites are not spared from the fighting. Rockets are being fired near these camps or the health facilities where people have sought shelter. It’s appalling and unacceptable. We are also seeing a very worrying proportion of civilians among the hundreds of wounded we are helping to treat. Some are victims of stray bullets, but others are victims of the warring parties’ failure to respect certain basic rules of conflict. In Masisi, the hospital we support came under fire while more than 10,000 people were seeking shelter. Two people were hit just outside the hospital and two of our staff were injured by rocket fire. The presence of combatants or artillery positions in close proximity to health facilities and camps for internally displaced people puts lives at immediate risk. It is important for everyone to remember that even war has its rules.

                          What is MSF’s current response on the ground?

                          We are doing our utmost to maintain our regular and emergency activities, but in some areas we have had to limit the risks by reducing the size of our teams. Around Goma, for example, direct armed violence has reduced our ability to go to certain affected sites over the past two days, although we continue to supply medical facilities, help them prepare for an influx of wounded, and bring in fuel to run water pumps as soon as conditions allow. This allows these facilities to continue to function, even with a more limited presence of our teams.

                          In Goma itself, we continue to support the Kyeshero Hospital to treat some of the wounded and to relieve the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), which is on the front line treating the wounded at the Ndosho hospital. It is clear that the hospitals in Goma are completely overwhelmed by the number of wounded.

                          In the rest of North and South Kivu, despite the security and logistical challenges and restrictions on movement, we are maintaining our presence and continuing to treat patients, including the wounded. In three weeks, nearly 400 casualties have been treated at the Minova General Referral Hospital, the Numbi Hospital Centre and the Masisi General Referral Hospital. We are also continuing to support displaced people in more remote areas, such as Lubero, where we are also working to improve access to water in health facilities and at the Magasin site for displaced people.

                          MIL OSI NGO

                        4. MIL-OSI NGOs: UK: ‘Apartheid, Occupation, Genocide’ panel event with leading international law experts on Israel/Palestine

                          Source: Amnesty International –

                          Amnesty International UK and the International Centre of Justice for Palestinians are hosting a panel event in central London on Tuesday 12 November with four leading international law experts to discuss the worsening human rights crisis in Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territory.

                          The expert panel – comprising Zaha Hassan, Gerhard Kemp, Itay Epshtain and Victor Kattan – will discuss how enforcing international law can help secure justice for Palestinians.

                          The panellists will be available for media interviews both before and after the event.

                          The event is being held at 1 Birdcage Walk in central London. Further information and tickets are available here

                          Event details

                          What: Amnesty International UK and the International Centre of Justice for Palestinians panel discussion with the following speakers:

                          Zaha Hassan, Palestinian human rights lawyer, and former coordinator and senior legal advisor to the Palestinian negotiating team during Palestine’s bid for UN membership

                          Gerhard Kemp, Professor of law at UWE Bristol Law School, and extraordinary professor of public law at Stellenbosch University, South Africa

                          Itay Epshtain, Special Advisor on International Law and Humanitarian Principles to the Norwegian Refugee Council, and former director of Amnesty International Israel

                          Victor Kattan, Assistant Professor of Public International Law at the University of Nottingham School of Law

                          Where: 1 Birdcage Walk, Westminster, London SW1H 9JJ

                          When: Tuesday 12 November 2024, 19:00-21:30

                          View latest press releases

                          MIL OSI NGO

                        5. MIL-OSI NGOs: Treating open wounds in the West Bank Palestine

                          Source: Médecins Sans Frontières –

                          It’s a sunny morning in Nur Shams refugee camp, in Tulkarem, West Bank, Palestine. Over 20 women are filing into a room set up by Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) staff, sitting in a circle and chatting over Arabic coffee. In the middle of the room, there is a table with gauze, tourniquet devices and charts explaining blood flow in the human body. This is MSF’s ‘stop the bleeding’ training.

                          Most women gathered in this room have little to no medical training, but trauma wounds and severe bleeding are not new to them. They are here to learn how to care for wounds, apply tourniquets, and provide basic first aid to family members and neighbours until they can reach medical care during frequent military incursions by Israeli forces.

                          “We experience raids, bombings, and injuries from shootings,” says Saeda Ahmad, a participant in the training. “We often have an injured person right in front of us. In such situations, it’s important for us to have the knowledge and background to properly administer first aid.”

                          “During raids, it’s extremely difficult for ambulances to reach the scene,” continues Ahmad. “That’s why everyone in the camp needs to have some knowledge of first aid. So that we ourselves can help the injured person.”

                          Here, military raids by Israeli forces are becoming increasingly frequent, and blockages of access to healthcare are part of the modus operandi. Roads are blocked, ambulances cannot move, healthcare workers are harassed and targeted or otherwise hindered, and wounded people often cannot reach hospitals.

                          Incursions from Israeli forces are also increasing in violence and intensity; on 3 October, 18 people were killed in an airstrike on Tulkarem refugee camp. The use of drone strikes, air strikes and other bombardments by Israeli forces, in often densely-populated areas and refugee camps, has become increasingly common. Incursions are also increasing in length, and not only here; last August, in Jenin, north of Tulkarem, Israeli forces launched a large-scale military incursion that lasted nine days.

                          In this context of constant violence and insecurity, people in the camps have spoken with MSF mental health staff of the deep psychological impacts of these raids. Military incursions by Israeli forces reshape the lives of people, stripping them of normalcy and any sense of safety.

                          People are always in the aftermath from the last incursion, rebuilding torn up streets and destroyed houses, while holding their breath until the next military raid. Our teams are also providing psychological first aid to residents in the camp, to address the significant mental health issues stemming from the impact of these incursions, which affect all residents, but particularly children.

                          “The situation is very difficult. The children in the camps are afraid to go to school, as they fear a raid might happen while they are there,” says an MSF community health educator for MSF in Tulkarem. “In their home life, stability has vanished. People remain on edge.”

                          “Children have stopped playing in the alleys. They spend most of the time at home and are not able to go out,” says our health educator. “They can’t even go out to buy what they need because their parents won’t let them, out of fear that a raid or incident might occur while they’re outside. There are children whose entire playtime has become centred around the violence they have experienced.”

                          In a context of fear and insecurity, it becomes impossible for people to live a normal life or plan for the future. Training like ‘stop the bleeding’ can provide some sense of control over the situation, by giving residents the tools to act in a medical emergency during an incursion. But their very existence highlights the direness of the situation in the West Bank.

                          In this room, as participants practice wrapping gauze around each other’s arms, emotional wounds also reveal themselves. Participants share stories of the violence they have experienced, in conversations, stories, and photos of killed family members on a phone’s lock screen.

                          The psychological wounds, also, are deep. And mending them takes more time than applying pressure or tightening a tourniquet.

                          MIL OSI NGO