Category: Politics

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: Spectacular Hong Kong Flower Show to close tomorrow (with photos)

    Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

    Spectacular Hong Kong Flower Show to close tomorrow  
         After the show, flowers that are in good condition and suitable for replanting will be distributed to the public at 9am on March 24 at the park’s South Pavilion Plaza (near the Sugar Street entrance). It is estimated that about 3 500 pots will be distributed, subject to conditions of the plants. Each person will be given one pot only on a first-come, first-served basis while stocks last. To help protect the environment, members of the public are encouraged to bring their own bags.
     
         During the flower show period, various recreational fringe activities have been held at the showground. One of the activities, the Jockey Club Student Drawing Competition, held its prize presentation ceremony today (March 22). Winning entries are now on display at the showground.
     
         The competition was conducted in five categories and the champions are as follows:
     
    Junior Section in Primary School:
    Lee Mung-lam from Lee Chi Tat Memorial School
    Senior Section in Primary School:
    Fang Yun-wei from Y.C.H. Choi Hin To Primary School
    Junior Section in Secondary School:
    Li Yi-wan from Shun Lee Catholic Secondary School
    Senior Section in Secondary School:
    Deng Man-yuen from C.C.C. Mong Man Wai College
    Tertiary Institution Section:
    Huang Wei-cheng from Hong Kong Design Institute
     
         In addition, National Games Exhibition and fun-filled family programmes are being held on the park’s central lawn. They include balloon-twisting, magic shows, bouncy slide, Jockey Club Community Green Playground, green activities workshops as well as the newly added busking performances. For the schedule of the activities, please refer to the webpage www.hkflowershow.hk/en/hkfs/2025/activities.html 
         Meanwhile, the flower show is hosting an online voting campaign called “My Most Favourite Garden Plot” (
    www.hkflowershow.hk/en/hkfs/2025/voting.html 
         The flower show is running until March 23 from 9am to 9pm daily. For more details and its admission fee arrangements, please visit the webpage
    www.hkflowershow.hk/en/hkfs/2025/index.html 
         The flower show is organised by the Leisure and Cultural Services Department. The Hong Kong Jockey Club Charities Trust has supported the flower show since 2013 and has been its major sponsor since 2014.
     
    Issued at HKT 12:20

    NNNN

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Canberra Sport and Recreation Clubs share $3.2 million investment

    Source: Northern Territory Police and Fire Services

    As part of ACT Government’s ‘One Government, One Voice’ program, we are transitioning this website across to our . You can access everything you need through this website while it’s happening.

    Released 24/03/2025

    Canberra sporting and recreation clubs will share over $3.2million in funding through the latest round of the ACT Government’s Sport and Recreation Investment Scheme.

    Four funding options are available through the Scheme including:

    • The Community Sport Facilities Funding Program supports the development of new high quality, sustainable facilities, or the upgrade of existing facilities, to maintain or increase physical activity in the Canberra community.
    • The Club Enhancement Program assists sporting and recreation groups to further develop their local services and programs including purchasing equipment, upskilling coaches and officials or supporting improvements to club governance.
    • The State Organisation Support Program provides funding through 3-year agreements to be used for improving organisational capacity and capability.
    • The Industry Partnership Program allows the ACT Government to co-invest with State Sporting Organisations, in innovative and collaborative projects which are scalable and sustainable.

    Minister for Sport and Recreation, Yvette Berry says this investment in Canberra’s sport and recreation organisations enables much needed improvements and upgrades allowing for increased participation and inclusiveness.

    “The Scheme supports not-for-profit sport, recreation and community organisations in developing fit for purpose, sustainable and accessible places and spaces for sport and active recreation.

    “Through this round, among the 38 successful applicants, the ACT Water Ski Association will receive $190,000 to upgrade the Water Ski Clubhouse facilities, including a refurbishment of the kitchen and bathrooms to create a more welcoming and inclusive environment for members.

    “Tuggeranong BMX Club will be able to replace the BMX start gate with $47,000 of funding through the scheme.

    “The Belconnen Netball Association were successful in obtaining $571,000 in support to construct a new female and male toilet and change facilities, a full accessible toilet with shower and enhanced storage space.

    “The Sport and Recreation Investment Scheme supports the ambition of the ACT Government’s CBR Next Move strategy by investing in facilities for greater participation in sport and recreation.

    “Maintaining our sporting facilities is essential to ensure that the community can continue to participate in the sporting and recreation activities that they love, promoting a healthy lifestyle throughout the Canberra community.”

    Quote attributable to Kim Clarke, President of Belconnen Netball Association.

    “We are delighted to receive this investment from the ACT Government to upgrade our off-court facilities at Charnwood to ensure they are a more welcoming and inclusive environment for all our participants and supporters. Our current toilet and storage facilities are not suitable to cater for up to 2000 users on competition days and this support will ensure a safe, accessible and welcoming environment for everyone to play and attend our netball activities and competitions.”

    Quote attributable to Maria Cowan, President of ACT Waterski Tournament Division.

    “On behalf of Waterski ACT we are incredibly excited to be a successful recipient of an investment from the ACT Government for our clubhouse facilities including the kitchen and bathrooms at Molonglo Reach. The project is essential to rectify the current outdated facilities particularly in relation to acceptable standards for female facilities and disabled access.

    Quote attributable to Paul Stewart, President of Tuggeranong BMX Club.

    “The new starting gate will significantly improve the sporting experience and safety of our club members particularly children and beginners. We are very thankful to the ACT Government for this support to ensure this important improvement is made at our club for all our participants.”

    For more information visit the Sport and Recreation website at www.sport.act.gov.au/grants.

    – Statement ends –

    Yvette Berry, MLA | Media Releases

    «ACT Government Media Releases | «Minister Media Releases

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: $110.6 million renewed commitment to end gender-based violence in NSW

    Source: Assistant Minister for Industry, Innovation and Science

    The Albanese Labor Government and Minns Labor Government are working together to deliver more critical frontline family, domestic and sexual violence services in NSW.

    Both governments have demonstrated their commitment to ending gender-based violence by renewing the five-year National Partnership Agreement on Family, Domestic and Sexual Violence Responses.

    Under the agreement, the Australian Government will provide an additional $110.6 million to NSW to bolster family, domestic and sexual violence services and action in the state.

    This additional investment will bring the total Commonwealth funding by the Albanese Government for NSW to $210.6 million since 2022.

    Minister for Social Services, Amanda Rishworth, said renewing the FDSV National Partnership demonstrated the dedication of governments to making real and meaningful change for Australians.

    “Under the National Plan to End Violence against Women and Children 2022-2032, all governments have made a commitment to ending gender-based violence in Australia, which requires us to come together and focus efforts and funding where it is needed most for victim-survivors and people at risk of violence,” Minister Rishworth said.

    “This funding and renewed agreement with NSW will strengthen funding to frontline services and further our shared goal of creating a safer Australia.”

    Minister for the Prevention of Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault Jodie Harrison said addressing domestic, family and sexual violence is priority for the NSW Government.

    “We welcome the additional $110 million from the Federal Government under the National Partnership Agreement. With matched funding by the NSW Government, we will be focusing on the important work of driving down the prevalence of domestic, family and sexual violence in our state.”

    The renewed FDSV National Partnership will deliver over $700 million across all jurisdictions in new, matched investments from the Commonwealth and states and territories, supporting frontline FDSV services, including specialist services for women and children impacted by FDSV, and men’s behaviour change programs.

    An additional $1 million will also be used for an independent evaluation of the renewed FDSV National Partnership.

    More information on the FDSV National Partnership Agreement is available on the Federal Financial Relations website.

    If you or someone you know is experiencing, or at risk of experiencing domestic, family and sexual violence, you can call 1800RESPECT on 1800 737 732, text 0458 737 732 or visit www.1800respect.org.au for online chat and video call services:

    • Available 24/7: Call, text or online chat
    • Mon-Fri, 9am – midnight AEST (except national public holidays): Video call (no appointment needed)

    If you are concerned about your behaviour or use of violence, you can contact the Men’s Referral Service on 1300 766 491 or visit www.ntv.org.au

    Feeling worried or no good? Connect with 13YARN Aboriginal & Torres Strait Islander Crisis Supporters on 13 92 76, available 24/7 from any mobile or pay phone, or visit www.13yarn.org.au No shame, no judgement, safe place to yarn.

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: New northside hospital early delivery partner

    Source: Australian National Party

    As part of ACT Government’s ‘One Government, One Voice’ program, we are transitioning this website across to our . You can access everything you need through this website while it’s happening.

    Released 24/03/2025

    The ACT Government’s northside hospital project has taken another step forward with the appointment of Multiplex as the early delivery partner to support continued work on design and planning to enable construction commencement in this term of Government.

    Following the successful delivery of the more than $640 million Canberra Hospital Expansion, the ACT Government is pleased to be partnering with Multiplex again to deliver the next stage of the northside hospital project that will transform the North Canberra Hospital campus.

    This $1 billion investment will be the largest health infrastructure project ever undertaken in the ACT, delivering a new state-of-the-art hospital for Canberra’s north.

    A competitive tender was undertaken in 2024 to secure a contractor early in the process, building on the Early Contractor Involvement approach taken in the Canberra Hospital Expansion project.

    As the successful tenderer, Multiplex will work collaboratively with the project team and ensure the best advice is available to inform infrastructure planning and design for the new hospital.

    Multiplex brings extensive hospital construction experience, having successfully completed key health projects across Australia, including Canberra Hospital’s Critical Services Building, greenfield developments, research facilities, and major site refurbishments.

    As delivery partners, Multiplex takes a holistic approach, and welcomes the opportunity to collaborate with clients early in the design and planning phase to bring construction expertise to the table.

    The new northside hospital will be delivered alongside the continued transformation of the Canberra Hospital campus through the Canberra Hospital Master Plan and development of community health infrastructure projects including the new South Tuggeranong, Inner South, North Gungahlin and West Belconnen Health Centres, the new health precinct in Watson and the Tuggeranong hydrotherapy pool.

    These new and upgraded facilities will provide Canberra’s growing community with access to services in modern and sustainable health settings.

    The ACT Government and Multiplex will continue our strong collaboration with consumers, carers and the health workforce in designing high-quality hospital facilities as part of the Very Early Contractor Involvement contract, with the next phase of community consultation expected in mid-2025.

    More information on the Northside Hospital Project is at https://www.act.gov.au/builtforcbr/NorthsideHospital.

    While planning for the new hospital progresses, services will continue as usual at North Canberra Hospital, with the safety, health and wellbeing of consumers, visitors and staff remaining our top priority.

    Attribute to Minister for Health Rachel Stephen-Smith:

    “The ACT Labor Government delivered the $640 million Canberra Hospital Expansion project in the last term of Government, which included the state-of-the-art Critical Services Building.

    “The more than $1 billion northside hospital will become the largest health infrastructure development undertaken in the Territory and this is an exciting milestone for the project.

    “Infrastructure Canberra and Multiplex will work closely with Canberra Health Services over the coming months to develop a concept design for this new state-of-the-art hospital for Canberra’s north, supporting our commitment to commencing construction in the term of Government.

    “Very early contractor involvement means we are bringing the delivery team together with the planning and design experts on the ground sooner to frame a vision for innovation, sustainability and exceptional clinical service delivery.

    “Through this partnership there will also be significant opportunity for consumers, carers, our health workforce and the broader community to work with us on the planning and design of a modern and well-connected health facility.

    Quotes attributable Multiplex NSW/ACT Regional Managing Director, David Ghannoum:

    “Multiplex is proud to be part of the planning for the Territory’s largest-ever investment in health infrastructure. We look forward to leveraging our expertise and working with hospital stakeholders to create a design that provides a purpose-built and world-class healthcare facility for Canberrans.

    “Having delivered the University of Canberra Public Hospital in 2017 and the Canberra Hospital Expansion in 2024, we are eager to reconnect with the community and will be implementing specific initiatives to support local employment and training.”

    – Statement ends –

    Rachel Stephen-Smith, MLA | Media Releases

    «ACT Government Media Releases | «Minister Media Releases

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI Africa: Home Affairs, SIU to launch anti-corruption forum in border management

    Source: South Africa News Agency

    Sunday, March 23, 2025

    The Minister of Home Affairs, Dr Leon Schreiber, and the Head of the Special Investigating Unit (SIU), Advocate Andy Mothibi, will launch the Border Management and Immigration Anti-Corruption Forum (BMIACF) in Pretoria on Tuesday, 25 March 2025.

    According to the statement released on Sunday, this initiative forms a key 
    part of the intensified and coordinated effort to clamp down on corruption in this sector.

    Leaders from the Department of Home Affairs, Border Management Authority (BMA), the National
    Prosecuting Authority (NPA) and civil society organisations will attend the launch.

    “This significant event will bring together key stakeholders from government, civil society, and law enforcement agencies to discuss strategies for combating corruption in border management and immigration.”

    The launch of the BMIACF will take place at the Government Communication and Information System (GCIS) auditorium. – SAnews.gov.za

    MIL OSI Africa

  • MIL-OSI Africa: Majodina hands over Garden Route Dam raw water pump station

    Source: South Africa News Agency

    Water and Sanitation Minister Pemmy Majodina, has marked World Water Day celebration by officially handing over a newly Garden Route Dam raw water pumpstation to the George Local Municipality, Western Cape.

    Unveiled on Saturday, the newly upgraded Garden Route Pump Station and its association infrastructure, forms part of the Budget Facility Water Project being implemented at George Local Municipality.

    The upgraded work at the dam and pump station involved replacing the old 600 millimetres (mm) diameter pipe with new 800 mm diameter steel outlet pipes to increase the pumping capacity of raw water into the balancing dam. 

    In addition, two 1 250 kilovolt-amperes (KVA) generators were installed to ensure uninterrupted pumping, even during power supply failures.

    The department stated that this project is one of 12 sub-projects under the Water Security and Remedial Works Project underway in the municipality. 

    The total project value exceeds R1.1 billion and is funded by the National Treasury’s Budget Facility for Infrastructure (BFI) through the Regional Bulk Infrastructure Grant (RBIG) from the Department of Water and Sanitation. 

    The department allocated the funds to the municipality to implement the project over four years.

    George Municipality, which is also the implementing agent of the project, has contributed an additional R305 million to make the total budget R1.4 billion. 

    The multiple-phase project started in 2022 and is anticipated to be completed by December 2025.

    Speaking at the event, Majodina said the handing over of the completed project at George Municipality, reaffirms government’s commitment to expand access to safe drinking water to all citizens. 

    “George municipality is rapidly growing with the current daily potable water demand of 38 megalitres per day, and it is projected to increase to 106 megalitres per day over the next 50 years. Today is a demonstration of our commitment to ensure that we meet the rising water demand that is occasioned by the rapid population growth,” the Minister said. 

    She said the project was an example of a successful inter-departmental collaboration between the national, provincial and local governments.  

    She added that the project would ensure that the municipality has a sustainable supply of water for generations to come.

    Mayor of George Municipality, Jacqueline von Brandis, expressed deep appreciation to the Minister and the department for the funding as it has unlocked economic and socio-economic opportunities for the tourism-inclined municipality. 

    “We are celebrating an example of intergovernmental success. We are here to showcase the outstanding work and service delivery that can be achieved if we work together. Our BFI grant has been instrumental in enabling us to make significant strides in ensuring that our ever-growing city is water-secured for generations to come,” von Brandis said.

    The mayor also extended her gratitude towards the Department of Water and Sanitation and National Treasury for this investment. 

    George Municipality currently provides water services to over 294 942 residents from 85 931 households across 28 wards, including Pacaltsdorp, Thembalethu, and coastal areas such as Kleinkrantz, Wilderness, Victoria Bay, Herold’s Bay, and Gwaing.

    Over the years, the municipality has experienced a substantial increase in its population. 

    The 12 phases of the project will improve water security and resilience for the current residents and support significant future expansion in various areas within George.

    The projects will also prevent sewage spillages through upgrading critical sewage pump stations.

    The core of the project is to increase the security of raw water supply to the Garden Route Dam and raw water balancing dams and to increase the capacity of two Water Treatment Works (WTW), which currently provide 38 megalitres (ml/d) to communities. 

    The project will therefore increase this capacity to 60 60 Megaliters Per Day (ml/d), through the construction of a new 20 ml/d extension and the upgrading of the old WTW.

    The upgrade of the Kaaimans River raw water pump station, which transports water from the Kaaimans River to the Garden Route Dam, will improve the supply and storage of raw water.

    This enhancement will increase the bulk availability and security of raw water for the current and future population of George.

    The scope of the 12 sub-projects includes:

    • A new 20 ml/d water treatment works adjacent to the old 38 ml/d water treatment plant
    • Construction of a new sludge treatment plant
    • Rehabilitation of old water treatment plant   
    • Refurbishment of the existing sludge discharge system in the old water treatment plant
    • Upgrade of Garden Route Dam outlet supply pipework
    • New Generator for Garden Route Dam Pumpstation
    • New 40 megalitres balancing dam and pipeline to new water treatment plant
    • Replacement of pumps for Kaaimans River pumpstations
    • New reservoir for Pacaltsdorp (West)
    • New reservoir, tower, and pump station of Pacaltsdorp (East)
    • New pump station and upgrade of supply pipeline for Thembalethu (West)
    • New reservoir, tower, and pump station for Thembalethu (East)

    The department highlighted that George Municipality is geared for current and future residential and commercial developments in the east of George and two other more prominent future development areas to the east of Thembalethu and the south of Pacaltsdorp. 

    “Therefore, the water security and remedial works project will provide certainty that water services will be provided to new residential units as well as commercial and industrial sites,” the department said. – SAnews.gov.za
     

    MIL OSI Africa

  • MIL-OSI Africa: President Ramaphosa concludes visit to the Republic of Namibia

    Source: South Africa News Agency

    President Cyril Ramaphosa has concluded his working visit to the Republic of Namibia, where he attended the inauguration ceremony of President Netumbo Nandi-Ndaitwah.

    The ceremony which coincided with the Republic’s 35th Anniversary of Independence Day, was held on Friday, 21 March 2025, at the State House in Windhoek.

    The President joined other Heads of State and Government who attended the ceremony, to congratulate President Nandi-Ndaitwah on becoming the fifth and first female President of the Republic.

    President Ramaphosa has described the occasion as a monumental celebration for women empowerment for embracing and recognising the role women play in the African continent and the opportunities given to women to show their capabilities and leadership.

    “Our hearts are warm from what we witnessed here today that the role of women has been fully embraced, and we also embrace it. As many countries on the continent, we wait for the moment, when the women on our continent will rise to the top,” President Ramaphosa said.

    The working visit provided an opportunity to reaffirm the strategic nature of the cordial bilateral relations between South Africa and Namibia and further consolidate bilateral cooperation between the two countries.

    South Africa and Namibia enjoy excellent bilateral relations due to the deep fraternal and historic relationship cemented during the fight against colonialism and apartheid.

    Namibia’s stability and the interrelated ties with South Africa make the country a natural strategic partner not only in the Southern African Development Community (SADC), but also in the broader African Union (AU) context and globally.

    President Ramaphosa said he is looking forward to working closely with the new President and her government to advance mutual political and economic interest and the integration of the African continent.

    Both countries pursue Africa’s renewal, South-South Cooperation, and the promotion of a rules-based international system.

    The President was accompanied by the Minister of International Relations and Cooperation, Ronald Lamola. – SAnews.gov.za

    MIL OSI Africa

  • MIL-OSI Africa: Creecy unveils private sector role in revitalising rail and port infrastructure

    Source: South Africa News Agency

    Transport Minister Barbara Creecy has officially unveiled a groundbreaking Request for Information (RFI), aimed at transforming the country’s struggling rail and port infrastructure through strategic partnerships with the private sector.

    “Today, I am launching an online request for information to develop an enabling environment for Private Sector Participation (PSP) and enhance investment in rail and port infrastructure and operations,” Creecy said during a media briefing on Sunday. 

    The Minister described this decision as a significant step in government’s efforts to partner with the private sector, ensuring that the country’s rail network and ports reclaim their crucial role in enhancing trade and driving economic growth.

    Creecy highlighted the urgent need for intervention, citing significant challenges, including infrastructure deterioration, vandalism, theft, underinvestment, and operational inefficiencies that have hindered economic growth. 

    “The limited availability of State resources to fund infrastructure development and address backlogs has intensified these challenges, severely restricting the ability of State-Owned Entities (SOEs) to fulfill their critical mandates.,” she explained. 

    The Minister told journalists that Transnet and government have received many “unsolicited“ proposals from the private sector offering investment skills and expertise to support the rehabilitation and reform of our struggling rail and port systems.

    “This overwhelming interest has made it clear to the department and Transnet that we must engage in broad and inclusive market research before issuing requests for proposals in August this year.” 

    However, according to the Minister, these processes are not formal procurement methods, but rather a mechanism to gather and analyse information from the market.

    She stated that the government recognises the importance of understanding the freight logistics landscape from the perspective of interested and affected parties. 

    The Minister believes that this will ensure that solutions are both effective and sustainable during this initial phase of PSP.

    The RFI targets key mineral export routes, include the corridor from Northern Cape to Saldanha for iron ore and manganese exports, as well as the routes from Limpopo and Mpumalanga to Richards Bay for coal and chrome exports. 

    In addition, there is an intermodal supply chain project that focuses on the container and automotive sectors.

    This project encompasses the port, container, and automotive port terminals, as well as back-of-port arrangements and railway and inland terminals. 

    It will also address the corridors connecting Gauteng and KwaZulu-Natal (Durban), Gauteng and Eastern Cape (East London, Port Elizabeth and Ngqura), and Gauteng and Western Cape (Cape Town). 

    “The RFI represents a pivotal step forward in our shared commitment to building a 21st-century transport system that goes beyond mobility to strengthen industrial competitiveness, deepen regional integration, and drive inclusive economic growth.” 

    Creecy believes this move will help the department express challenges in a structured and coherent manner, clearly defining their scope, context, and impact to guide the development of focused, strategic, and sustainable solutions.

    Support for new and emerging players

    Meanwhile, Creecy said the State has committed to principles of job retention, State asset ownership, localisation, and Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment (BBBEE) and gender equality, by providing strong support to new and emerging players in the rail and port sectors. 

    A dedicated PSP unit, to be hosted by the Development Bank of South Africa, will oversee the initiative.

    The eight-week online consultation process, running from 24 March to 9 May 2025, aims to gather comprehensive market insights before issuing formal proposals in August. 

    Stakeholders are encouraged to participate through the department’s website or dedicated online portal at www.psp-rfi.co.za, with all submitted information to be treated confidentially. 

    “I encourage all Interested and affected parties to actively engage in this RFI process, contributing to the PSP unit’s efforts in shaping the potential PSP programme of projects and designing future bid packages for procurement,” she added. 

    Government plans to release a second RFI focusing on passenger rail initiatives in May this year. – SAnews.gov.za

    MIL OSI Africa

  • MIL-OSI Africa: SSA refutes ’Operation Sibonkolo’ report linked to Minister in the Presidency

    Source: South Africa News Agency

    Sunday, March 23, 2025

    The State Security Agency (SSA) has dismissed claims regarding the “Operation Sibonkolo” report linked to the Minister in the Presidency, Khumbudzo Ntshavheni. 

    This follows a report by Sunday World, which alleged that an intelligence document released by the SSA accusing Ntshavheni of misusing State resources to target her political opponents.

    According to the publication, which claims to have seen the report, the Minister initiated a covert operation named “Sibonkolo” to monitor and discredit Deputy President Paul Mashatile and other senior African National Congress (ANC) politicians, aiming to position herself among the party’s top six leaders.

    In a statement issued by the Ministry in the Presidency on Sunday, the SSA said it does not normally comment on media reports. However, the diversionary tactics being applied through the allegations of the so-called Operation Sibonkolo go against the progress being made to transform the agency as recommended by the High-Level Review Panel.

    “These tactics seek to paint the SSA as an agency stuck in a rogue mode. As a matter of fact, the SSA does not have an operation called Sibonkolo or any operation focused on the manipulation of the State apparatus to further or undermine any individual political ambitions. 

    “The work of the SSA is governed by established operational directives, while the process to establish the necessary regulations is underway. In addition, they said that the oversight mechanisms established through legislation are fully operational,“ the statement said. – SAnews.gov.za

    MIL OSI Africa

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: PM tells councils to prove action on pothole plague to unlock extra cash and reveals £4.8bn for major roads

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Press release

    PM tells councils to prove action on pothole plague to unlock extra cash and reveals £4.8bn for major roads

    The Plan for Change is tackling the pothole plague, building vital roads and ensuring every penny is delivering results for the taxpayer

    • £1.6 billion investment to tackle scourge of potholes to be delivered to councils from next month as PM tells councils to put cash to use
    • for the first time every council in England must publish how many potholes they’ve filled or lose road cash
    • local authorities that comply will receive their full share of the £500 million roads pot – enough to fill the equivalent of 7 million potholes a year, as part of the government’s Plan for Change
    • government also announces £4.8 billion for 25/26 for motorways and major A-roads including economy boosting road schemes on the A47 and M3

    The public will now see exactly what’s being done to tackle potholes, as the government demands councils prove their progress or face losing cash. 

    From mid-April, local authorities in England will start to receive their share of the government’s record £1.6bn highway maintenance funding, including an extra £500m – enough to fill 7 million potholes a year. 

    But to get the full amount, all councils in England must from today (24 March 2025) publish annual progress reports and prove public confidence in their work. Local authorities who fail to meet these strict conditions will see 25% of the uplift (£125m in total) withheld.

    Also today, the Transport Secretary has unveiled £4.8bn funding for 2025/6 for National Highways to deliver critical road schemes and maintain motorways and major A-roads.

    This cash will mean getting on with pivotal schemes in construction, such as the A428 Black Cat scheme in Cambridgeshire, and starting vital improvements to the A47 around Norwich and M3 J9 scheme in Hampshire, building thousands of new homes, creating high-paid jobs, connecting ports and airports, to grow the economy and deliver the Plan for Change.  

    It comes as figures from the RAC show drivers encounter an average of 6 potholes per mile in England and Wales, and pothole damage to cars costs an average £600 to fix. According to the AA, fixing potholes is a priority for 96% of drivers. 

    This government is delivering its Plan for Change to rebuild Britain and deliver national renewal through investment in our vital infrastructure which will drive growth and put more money in working people’s pockets by saving them costs on repairs.

    Prime Minister Keir Starmer said:

    The broken roads we inherited are not only risking lives but also cost working families, drivers and businesses hundreds – if not thousands of pounds – in avoidable vehicle repairs. Fixing the basic infrastructure this country relies on is central to delivering national renewal, improving living standards and securing Britain’s future through our Plan for Change.

    Not only are we investing an additional £4.8 billion to deliver vital road schemes and maintain major roads across the country to get Britain moving, next month we start handing councils a record £1.6 billion to repair roads and fill millions of potholes across the country.

    British people are bored of seeing their politicians aimlessly pointing at potholes with no real plan to fix them. That ends with us. We’ve done our part by handing councils the cash and certainty they need – now it’s up to them to get on with the job, put that money to use and prove they’re delivering for their communities.

    The Transport Secretary, Heidi Alexander, said: 

    After years of neglect we’re tackling the pothole plague, building vital roads and ensuring every penny is delivering results for the taxpayer.

    The public deserves to know how their councils are improving their local roads, which is why they will have to show progress or risk losing 25 per cent of their £500m funding boost. 

    Our Plan for Change is reversing a decade of decline and mending our pothole-ridden roads which damage cars and make pedestrians and cyclists less safe.

    To ensure councils are taking action, they must now publish reports on their websites by 30 June 2025, detailing how much they are spending, how many potholes they have filled, what percentage of their roads are in what condition, and how they are minimising streetworks disruption.

    They will also be required to show how they are spending more on long-term preventative maintenance programmes and that they have robust plans for the wetter winters the country is experiencing – making potholes worse. 

    By the end of October, councils must also show they are ensuring communities have their say on what work they should be doing, and where. The public can also help battle back against pothole ridden roads by reporting them to their local council, via a dedicated online portal

    To further protect motorists given continued cost-of-living pressures and potential fuel price volatility amid global uncertainty, the government has frozen fuel duty at current levels for another year to support hardworking families and businesses, saving the average car driver £59.  

    Edmund King, AA president and member of the Pothole Partnership, said:  

    Getting councils to show value for money before getting full funding is a big step in the right direction, as it will encourage a more concerted attack on the plague of potholes. At the same time, local authorities can share best practice, so others can learn what new innovations and planned maintenance techniques have worked for them.” 

    The £4.8bn for National Highways will protect the country’s strategic road network, which provides critical routes and connections across the country for people, businesses and freight to help drive for growth as part of Plan for Change.

    The £4.8bn includes a record £1.3bn investment to keep this vital network in good repair, so the network remains fit for the future, and £1.8bn for National Highways’ daily operations that are critical to ensuring the network runs safely and smoothly for millions of people and businesses that rely on it every day. As well as £1.3bn for essential improvement schemes to unlock growth and housing.  

    Since entering office, the government has approved over £200m for the A47 Thickthorn Junction, and £290m for M3 Junction 9 plus £90m for local road schemes like the A130 Fairglen Interchange, the South-East Aylesbury Link Road, the A350 Chippenham Bypass, the A647 scheme in Leeds. This is a total of over £580m for schemes to get Britain moving.

    Roads media enquiries

    Media enquiries 0300 7777 878

    Switchboard 0300 330 3000

    Updates to this page

    Published 23 March 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Housing Bill: Women must be better protected to flee domestic abuse

    Source: Scottish Greens

    The Bill must protect as many women as possible.

    Scottish Green MSP Maggie Chapman has lodged proposals to expand the definition of domestic abuse to protect more women and children who are facing homelessness. The proposal will be considered as an amendment to the upcoming Housing (Scotland) Bill.

    Ms Chapman believes that the Scottish Government’s current definition within the context of this bill is not broad enough to offer the necessary protections, only covering violent, threatening and intimidating conduct.

    The expanded definition that Ms Chapman is calling for would see controlling, coercive, and degrading behaviour included within the definition – a change that charity organisation Scottish Women’s Aid has long called for.

    Ms Chapman said:

    “Women might feel unable to leave a violent and abusive relationship for fear of ending up homeless, and that sense of feeling trapped only increases when there are children involved in the process.

    “This bill must work to enhance the support we offer women and children, so that they are better protected and able to flee from abuse, without fear of being left homeless or placed in unsuitable and unsafe accommodation due to their experience of abuse not matching the government’s definition.

    “By expanding the definition of domestic abuse, we can help to resolve that fear and create a more hopeful future for women and their families who are rebuilding their lives.”

    Ms Chapman has also lodged an amendment that would force the Scottish Government to implement the findings of their December 2020 report on improving housing outcomes for women and children experiencing domestic abuse.

    The actions called for in the report include: improving how homelessness due to domestic abuse appears in statistics, developing a Housing First pathway for women experiencing domestic abuse, and developing a timetable to implement the Ending Homelessness Together action plan that will ensure the homelessness system meets the needs of diverse groups of women.

    Ms Chapman said:

    “There are groups who have been waiting years for the findings of this report to be put into action. My proposal will bring them forward and help ensure that women and children experiencing domestic abuse are provided with the right services, with the right support and regular reviews to ensure that progress is being made.”

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Taking on Trump & Farage – and fixing church roofs

    Source: Liberal Democrats UK

    We meet at a time of great peril. For our continent, and for our country.

    Because Donald Trump is not only betraying Ukraine. It’s not only their sovereignty he’s selling out. It’s our security. The security of Europe and the security of our United Kingdom.

    And that is unforgivable.

    Putin might be able to fool Donald Trump into thinking that his ambitions do not extend beyond parts of Ukraine, but we know better. Just look at what he’s already doing in Georgia, in Moldova, in Romania – undermining their democracies and seeking to extend his grip further into Europe.

    Our brave Ukrainian allies are on the frontline. Fighting not just for their homes. Not just for their freedom. But for the freedom and security of people across Europe, including ours here in the UK. Their fight is our fight.

    So to our Ukrainian friends, on behalf of all Liberal Democrats, let me say once again – We thank you. We salute you. We stand with you. Today. Tomorrow. Always.

    And of course, that solidarity must go beyond mere words. That’s why I am proud that the United Kingdom has been Ukraine’s staunchest ally right from the start. Why I am so proud of the tens of thousands of British families who welcomed Ukrainians into their homes. Showing the incredible warmth and generosity of the British people. Why I am proud of all the military assistance we have given to the Ukrainian armed forces – the tanks and training, missiles and drones to repel Putin’s war machine. And it’s why I was proud that the Prime Minister brought Europe and Canada together here in Britain to chart a way forward, the day after those appalling scenes of Trump and Vance ambushing President Zelenskyy in the Oval Office.

    And Trump’s so-called “special envoy” might dismiss British leadership as pointless posturing, but we know what it really is… Britain, leading in Europe again, as we have done at the greatest moments in our nation’s history. And friends, it was good to see that again after such a long time, wasn’t it?

    But now we must step up our efforts and do more. Much more. For the defence of Ukraine, for the defence of Europe, and for our own national defence too.

    So we Liberal Democrats have led calls for far more support for Ukraine – funded by the tens of billions of pounds of Russian assets frozen in the UK, and the hundreds of billions of pounds frozen across the G7. We backed proposals for a new European Rearmament Bank, to finance a massive expansion of defence manufacturing here at home and across the continent. We pressed the Government to raise defence spending to 2.5% of GDP – and now we are continuing to push for cross-party talks to get it to 3%.

    Because the threat we face is existential.

    To our east, a murderous dictator hellbent on building a new Russian empire – and committing atrocities on European soil in pursuit of it. And to our west, for the first time in my life, a President of the United States willing not merely to turn a blind eye to Putin’s aggression – but actually to praise it. A President who has repeatedly demonstrated that he is not a reliable ally to Ukraine, to Britain, to Europe, or to anyone else.

    So the fundamental questions we now face are these:

    How do we deal with Putin?

    And how do we deal with Trump?

    Well, let me tell you how not to deal with them. Just like any bully, you don’t deal with them by curling up in a ball and hoping they’ll leave you alone. You don’t turn a blind eye as they attack your friends, praying that maybe they’ll stop there. You have to stand up. Stand tough. Stand together with our friends. Make clear that an attack on one is an attack on all.

    And that – for the vast majority of people in our country – is our instinctive response. Brits can’t stand a bully.

    What Trump and Putin are doing offends our fundamental British values of decency, fair play, respect for national sovereignty and the rule of law. Almost everyone I speak to – in every part of our country – feels that way. But there is one man who thinks differently.

    One lone holdout. Someone who simply doesn’t seem to get it. A man who splits his time between GB News, Mar-a-Lago… and weirdly selling nappies on social media, apparently. A man who can even, legend has it, occasionally be spotted in the House of Commons and – if you wait long enough – in the town of Clacton-on-Sea. Nigel Farage.

    Unlike you and me, Nigel Farage thinks Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin are great. Not in a “look, we have to be pragmatic and work with them” kind of way. More in a teenager with a celebrity crush kind of way.

    Don’t forget, when Farage was asked which world leader he most admired, his answer was Vladimir Putin. Yes, really. Now, to be fair, that was before Donald Trump became President – so I guess Putin might have slipped to number two by now. 

    A tyrant responsible for the brutal suppression of Russia’s own people, and countless atrocities in Ukraine. Who has murdered thousands of innocent civilians. And abducted 20,000 children from their homes. Snatched them away from their families.

    That, apparently, is the sort of man who wins Nigel Farage’s admiration.

    How despicable. How completely out-of-touch with British values. With human values. How unpatriotic. How deeply un-British. And this from a man who thinks he can be our Prime Minister. Not on our watch.

    With war on our continent, an unpredictable President in the White House, and an increasingly volatile world… This is no time for a nationalist.

    We need real British patriotism instead. At home and abroad, our country has big problems to solve. And let’s be absolutely clear: Nigel Farage is not the least bit interested in solving them.

    If Farage had his way, he would turn our great country into little more than a Donald Trump tribute act. He has said it himself: he sees Trump as his inspiration. He wants to do to Britain what Trump is doing to America: All the division. The nasty culture-war nonsense. The economic self-harm of tariffs. Cruelty for the sake of being cruel. Siding with criminals and undermining the rule of law. And of course, limiting your access to healthcare. And making you pay more for it.

    Farage doesn’t like to talk about it much these days, but he has been very clear throughout his long political career that he doesn’t believe in the fundamental NHS principle of universal healthcare free at the point of use. He’s called for an American-style insurance-based model. He says he’s “open to anything” when it comes to the future of the NHS – including privatisation. Just like his idol Donald would want.

    And apart from that, isn’t it striking that Farage has nothing to say about the challenges facing our NHS? Nothing to say about how to make sure people can actually see a doctor or a dentist when they need one. Nothing to say about ambulance delays or crumbling hospitals. Nothing to say about fixing social care, so that our loved ones get the care they need and carers get the support they deserve. And I mean literally – nothing to say. 

    Farage has never uttered the word “care” once in Parliament. Because the truth is: Nigel Farage doesn’t care.

    He hasn’t mentioned the “NHS” once either – or GPs, hospitals, ambulances, dentists. Imagine that. A political party whose leader has nothing at all to say on one of the biggest issues on people’s lips, and the biggest challenges we face. Our country has big problems to solve. And Nigel Farage is not the least bit interested in solving them.

    But friends, that’s not the worst of it, is it? What worries us most about Farage and Reform is the deeply destructive, divisive brand of politics they deploy.

    The weaponisation of difference. The demonisation of diversity. The scapegoating of “the other”. The superficial, simplistic, snake-oil solutions they peddle. We know where it all will lead, if we don’t stop it.

    We know what happens when cynical, opportunistic politicians seize on the struggles and the anxieties of ordinary people – Anxieties about the cost of living. About cultural and technological change. About sovereignty and security. When they exploit those struggles and anxieties for their own selfish ends – When they point the finger of blame at those who differ from you because of their religion or their nationality or the colour of their skin – When they teach that those people threaten your job or your family or your way of life – When they manipulate new forms of media to spread lies, sow fear and stir hatred – When they use those tools to convince you that their cause alone is righteous and all who stand against them are evil… We know where that ends.

    We have seen it before across history – too many times. It is the populist playbook, and its pages are very well-worn. It is ugly. It is powerful. And it is incredibly destructive. Not only to the groups they target – the vulnerable, the minorities – but ultimately to us all. To our whole society. To the very idea of liberal democracy that our United Kingdom embodies.

    And if this sounds alarmist or over-the-top, remember this: It always starts that way.

    With a reasonable, even beguiling face. With an appeal to “common sense” and “plain speaking”. But if allowed to take root, it grows and mutates with such speed and ferocity, till it fills every crack in the foundations of our country… Until those cracks become chasms.

    And what is broken can never be mended. So we know where it leads. We know what is at stake. Not just an election. Not just a set of policies. But the very future of liberal democracy itself.

    That is what’s under threat. And friends – Liberal Democrats – it falls to us to save it.

    Because with the Conservatives desperately chasing Reform’s tail – And Labour sounding more and more like them every day – We Liberal Democrats are the only ones with the courage and the conviction to stand up and offer something different. Offer a positive alternative. Something better… Hope.

    And here’s the good news – Because I know it can feel like the tides of history are against us right now. I know that when you look at Trump in America, Le Pen in France, the AfD in Germany, Reform here in the UK – When the headlines are so often so bleak – It can be tempting to give in to despair.

    Well the good news is this: What we can offer people is even more powerful than all their lies. All their false promises. The easy answers of the populist right. Even more powerful, and even more popular. Real hope.

    Hope based not on empty rhetoric or magical thinking – But on hard work and concrete action that people can see making a difference to their lives and to their communities.

    That’s what good old-fashioned Liberal Democrat community politics has always been all about. Winning people’s trust by getting things done. Showing them what liberal democracy can do for them – not by talking about it, but by rolling up our sleeves and actually doing it. Putting our policies into practice and our ideals into action.

    I don’t know if you heard what Kemi Badenoch said about us recently. Did you hear this?

    She said – and I quote: “A typical Liberal Democrat will be somebody who is good at fixing their church roof. And people in the community like them.”

    Good at fixing the church roof. People in the community like them.

    I think she meant it as an insult! But I’ll happily wear it as a badge of honour.

    Because she’s right. Liberal Democrats fix things.

    And isn’t it telling, that attitude from the Leader of the Conservative Party? 

    Not that she doesn’t like us – I’m not surprised about that. She’s got good reason not to like the Liberal Democrats… After all, we did take 60 seats off them last July! I’ll say that again, Conference… We took 60 seats off the Conservatives! So you can hardly blame them for being a bit upset!

    But what I’m talking about is the sneering attitude of the Leader of the Conservatives. The sneering attitude that says fixing church roofs is somehow beneath her. Even beneath politics altogether. That what happens in our communities is trivial and insignificant compared to debating the true meaning of conservatism on Twitter.

    And it goes far beyond Kemi Badenoch and church roofs. It’s the whole Conservative Party – whether in Westminster or in town halls and county halls across the country. They have abandoned our communities.

    The Conservatives left schools and hospitals to crumble. Left whole areas without enough GPs or dentists. Left water companies to pump filthy sewage into our rivers and seas. And they have left decent, traditional Conservatives without a political home.

    Their out-of-touch, disdainful thinking is why the Conservative Party is in the mess it is today. Treating the day-to-day things that matter in people’s lives not just with indifference, but outright contempt.

    It’s why so many lifelong Conservative voters have turned to the Liberal Democrats. It’s why people rightly kicked them out of government last July – And why we must kick them out of our councils in May too.

    But that Conservative disdain and neglect is also what has opened the door to Reform. And that’s why it’s so important that we Liberal Democrats are rooted in our communities, getting things done.

    Fixing the church roof – and much more besides. Showing people that politics can work for them. That who they vote for can make a difference. That their voice matters. 

    That is how you defeat the populists. How you drain away the cynicism that feeds them. How you win back people’s trust and restore their hope.

    It’s not easy, our way of doing politics.

    Liberal Democrat MPs certainly have to spend a lot more time in our constituencies than Nigel Farage spends in Clacton – although I admit that’s a low bar.

    That’s why no one ever joins the Liberal Democrats as a shortcut to high office. And if that’s why any of you are here today, I’m sorry to have to let you down like this.

    We join because we want to make a difference to our communities and our country. Even though we know it’s hard work. 

    And we join – we all joined – because of a genuine belief in the core Liberal values that have made our country great: Freedom and equality. Community and internationalism. A commitment to human rights, to the environment, and to democracy. And those values are exactly what this moment in history demands.

    At a time when people are facing so many daily challenges on so many different fronts – The cost of living crisis. An economy that is still barely growing. Public services that just aren’t working the way they should. Opportunity that feels further and further out of reach for too many young people.

    These are challenges that can really test our values. When people feel so economically insecure. When times are so tough. Historically these are the times that liberalism has struggled, that progress has stumbled. But these are the times when our liberal values are needed more than ever.

    To build the fair, free and open society we all believe in. So that people can get on in life – with real power to make their own choices and pursue their own dreams.

    Because we understand that if you free people – If you empower them to make their voices heard and hold the powerful properly to account – Then you unleash the best in people and create a better society and a stronger economy as a result.

    So that everyone gets a fair deal. Every child gets the best possible start in life, and everyone sees their hard work and aspiration properly rewarded. Everyone gets the care they need when they need it, and a helping hand if they fall on tough times.

    And friends, how critical are our Liberal, internationalist values right now?

    Not just on Ukraine and defending Europe from Putin – critical though that is. But on so many big, global challenges – from the rise of China to the threat of climate change to the risks of artificial intelligence.

    These are challenges that no nation can afford to ignore. And challenges that no nation can tackle alone. Pulling up the drawbridge simply isn’t an option. Like I said, this is no time for a nationalist.

    What we need is a movement of proud internationalists – People who believe that our country and our people thrive when we are open and outward-looking. Who know that the UK can be an incredible force for good when it stands tall on the world stage. And stands up for what is right. Who recognise that the concerns of one nation inevitably become the concerns of all nations. A movement of proud internationalists. And Liberal Democrats, that is who we are.

    The only party that has consistently opposed the Conservatives’ damaging Brexit deal from the start. The only party arguing for a new deal with the EU, with a Customs Union at its heart – putting us on a path back to the Single Market. The only party still championing international aid, after first the Conservatives and now Labour shamefully cut it.

    And friends, we’re the only party in British politics speaking up in defiance of Donald Trump. The only ones willing to state the obvious truth: that he is no leader of the free world. I mean, this is a man who stands on the White House drive, flogging Teslas for Elon Musk like a particularly bad used car salesman. It’s hardly “Ask not what your country can do for you”, is it?

    And more despicably, this is a man who halted shipments of food, medicine and other essential aid supplies to people around the world who desperately need them. Locking whole shipping containers in port for their contents to rot. So much for Ronald Reagan’s “shining city on a hill”.

    And remember – this is the man Nigel Farage calls his “inspiration”. We’re the only ones willing to say that Trump cannot be relied upon to play by the rules, or stick to agreements. That his presidency is a threat to peace and prosperity in the UK, across Europe, and around the world. And that we must deal with him as he is. Bullying. Narcissistic. Unpredictable. We must deal with Trump from a position of strength, not weakness.

    Like on trade. If there’s one thing we know, it’s that Donald Trump loves tariffs. He says it’s “the most beautiful word in the dictionary”…

    Which, when you think about it, really is a very Donald Trump way of deciding your economic policy, isn’t it?

    Now, as Liberals, we profoundly disagree. After all, it was the Victorian Liberals who overturned centuries of protectionism and ushered in a new era of free trade and prosperity. We can already see the damage Trump’s tariffs are doing to the US economy, with forecasters saying he may plunge it into recession. And we fear the damage his trade war could do to the world economy, impacting jobs and living standards here in the UK too.

    So the question, again, is how do we deal with him?

    And the answer, we say again, is from a position of strength. Regrettably, that’s not Labour’s strategy. They say: “Let’s be nice to him and hope he won’t hurt us”.

    Now Labour’s even talking about scrapping Britain’s tax on social media giants. Changing the UK’s tax policy to appease Donald Trump – and Elon Musk. Well appeasement never works with bullies, and it doesn’t work with Trump – as his tariffs on British steel already show.

    And let me say this to Elon Musk, who I know is my biggest fan… We will make out-of-control social media giants like you pay more – so we can defend our children and young people from the harm you’re causing them.

    But it’s not just Labour bending the knee to this White House. It’s the Conservatives too. They’d have us go to Mar-a-Lago, begging bowl outstretched, pleading for a trade deal on whatever terms Trump will give us. The Conservatives would sell out British farmers to President Trump, just as they sold them out in their damaging trade deals with Australia and New Zealand. And then they’d let Trump’s billionaire mates carve up the NHS between them. 

    Another Elon Musk rebrand, this time to NH-X.

    More and more appeasement – in the futile hope it would protect us from more Trump tariffs in future. But we know it wouldn’t. Of course it wouldn’t.

    Just look at how he’s treated Canada – a steadfast ally who fought fascism alongside the US and the UK. He has hit them with outrageous tariffs, breaking the trade deal between their two countries. Because he doesn’t like the deal, so he doesn’t think he has to stick to it.

    Last month he asked “who would ever sign a thing like this”. The answer, of course, is you did Donald. Only five years ago. His signature means nothing.

    So no, a bad Trump deal won’t protect us from tariffs. And playing nice, being weak, is no way to deal with him either. So let’s stand up to Trump. Let’s stand side by side with the EU and with our Commonwealth ally Canada. I urge the Prime Minister to bring those leaders together here in the UK to agree a coordinated response to Trump’s trade war – just like he’s rightly done on Putin’s murderous war. As others have done, we should hit back with tariffs of our own – starting with those Teslas Trump is so desperate to sell. 

    And Conference, let’s put ourselves in the strongest possible position by rebuilding our trade with Europe – Strengthening British businesses and showing Trump we have other options.

    So you see, when it comes to dealing with Trump – as with the other looming threats in the world right now – it is our liberal belief in internationalism that offers the solution. Conference, with Trump in the White House and Farage leading a Trump tribute act here in the UK – Our role in British politics has never been more essential. Our precious liberal values are the only antidote to their destructive nationalism. Our trademark community politics is the only way to defeat their cynical populism.

    The threat they pose is grave. The challenge before us is great. This is a battle of competing values. A battle of competing visions. A battle for the future.

    We didn’t choose this fight. But friends, I know you are up for it. I know together we can win it.

    For the future of our democracy. For the good of our communities. For the love of our country. Let’s go to battle.

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Government-backed technologies support those living with dementia

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Press release

    Government-backed technologies support those living with dementia

    Cutting-edge research networks backed by government to tackle debilitating symptoms of dementia including memory loss and communication difficulties

    People living with dementia are set to benefit from government-backed research designed to help them live more independently in their own homes.

    Four new research networks led by the UK’s top researchers, developers, health and social care professionals will focus on creating technologies to help dementia patients manage memory loss, communication difficulties and cope better with everyday tasks, in the hopes of slowing the progress of the disease and maximising the time they can spend safely and happily at home.   

    The teams will work alongside people living with dementia and carers to ensure lived experience and changing needs are at the heart of innovation, delivering the government’s Plan for Change to shift healthcare from hospitals into the community, with better results for patients while also reducing pressure on the NHS. 

    The four successful networks are: 

    • The University of Sheffield – to develop technologies to help dementia patients communicate as their disease progresses, supporting speech and memory challenges  

    • Heriot-Watt University – to develop technology to anticipate, and where possible slow, progression of dementia patients’ symptoms  

    • Northumbria University – to develop local hubs in rural and remote areas, where dementia patients can access technology to help them with everyday tasks  

    • Imperial College London – to develop easily-used tools to support independent living, and using AI to support data analytics  

    The networks will also collaborate with a range of key partners including NHS, Age UK, Alzheimer’s Society, Alzheimer’s Research UK and local authorities and councils, to deliver the projects, ensuring expertise at all levels is consulted on, and helping to develop the best outcome.  

    The projects are being backed by government, with The Minister of State for Health set to unveil £6.7 million in funding later this week at the World Dementia Council Summit on Tuesday 25th March.  

    The networks are funded by £6.7 million from the UKRI Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) and the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR), in partnership with Alzheimer’s Society.  

     Minister of State for Health, Karin Smyth, said:  

    Dementia is a cruel and heartbreaking disease, not only for those living with it, but for the families and friends who often watch their loved one become a shadow of the person they once were.   

    Backing these groundbreaking technologies won’t just help people with dementia – it’ll transform their lives, giving people the freedom to stay in their own homes, around the people they love.   

    Moving care out of hospitals and into communities isn’t just smart healthcare – it’s about giving people independence. Britain will be at the forefront of dementia innovation, backing cutting-edge research and rolling out life-changing technologies that deliver real results for patients and families. This is exactly the bold thinking we need at the heart of our Plan for Change.

    Science Minister, Lord Vallance said:

    Dementia is one of the biggest challenges to health and social care of our time. These four networks will take on that challenge, harnessing technology to improve the quality of life for those living with the disease.

    Helping people with Dementia to live more independently will allow us to move their care from hospitals to communities, reducing strain on the NHS and supporting the plans for health that are key to our Plan for Change.

    Professor Lucy Chappell, Chief Scientific Adviser at the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) and Chief Executive Officer of the NIHR said: 

    By developing networks and technologies that help people living with dementia stay independent for longer, and closer to home, we can help improve the quality of care that patients and their families receive.  

    I welcome this collaboration which will increase the range of support enabling dementia patients to live independently at home and in their communities and freeing up vital time and resource for other areas of treatment and care.

    Professor David Sharp at Imperial College London, and the Director of Care Research & Technology Centre, at the UK Dementia Research Institute, said:  

    This is a really exciting opportunity that will bring together UK scientists and partners from health and social care, industry, third sector and lived experience, to develop new technologies that will help people affected by dementia to live independently for as long as possible.

    According to an Alzheimer’s Society survey, 85% of people have said they would prefer to stay in their own home for as long as possible if diagnosed with dementia, but many are currently unable to do so. It is hoped these projects will help slow the progression of the disease and provide a better quality of life for people living with dementia, to help people out of hospital and back into the community, where they’re most comfortable.

    Updates to this page

    Published 23 March 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Government unleashes next generation of construction workers to build 1.5m homes

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    News story

    Government unleashes next generation of construction workers to build 1.5m homes

    New training will help deliver 1.5 million homes which will transform communities and drive growth through the Plan for Change.

    • Up to 60,000 more engineers, brickies, sparkies, and chippies to be trained by 2029, as Chancellor outlines how the government will train more workers to tackle skills shortages and inspire the next generation into the construction sector.
    • Reforms will get young people into well paid, high skilled, jobs in the construction sector by funding additional placements, establishing Technical Excellence Colleges, launching new foundation apprenticeships, and expanding Skills Bootcamps.
    • This injection of over £600 million over the next four years will also encourage experienced builders to help train and inspire the next generation.

    Ahead of the Spring Statement next week (Wednesday 26 March) the Chancellor has announced £600 million worth of investment to train up to 60,000 more skilled construction workers.

    This will deliver well paid jobs across the country in the construction sector and help build 1.5 million homes to transform communities by the end of this Parliament.

    Chancellor, Rachel Reeves said:

    We are determined to get Britain building again, that’s why we are taking on the blockers to build 1.5 million new homes and rebuild our roads, rail and energy infrastructure.

    But none of this is possible without the engineers, brickies, sparkies, and chippies to actually get the work done, which we are facing a massive shortage of. We’ve overhauled the planning system that is holding this country back, now we are gripping the lack of skilled construction workers, delivering on our Plan for Change to boost jobs and growth for working people.

    The sector is facing significant shortages, the latest Office for National Statistics figures show that there are over 35,000 job vacancies and employers report that over half of vacancies can’t be filled due to a lack of required skills – the highest rate of any sector. Demand is expected to increase further to deliver the homes and infrastructure that this country needs.

    Funding and reforms announced today will pay for more training places, ensure a sustainable flow of skilled construction workers and help businesses invest more in training. It will encourage the men and women who have spent decades working on building sites, to pass on their skills to the next generation of construction workers.

    Building the skilled workforce of the future is key to driving economic growth, the central mission of the government’s Plan for Change. These construction jobs are the type of secure, well paid, in demand jobs that will help put more money in working people’s pockets and fuel growth.

    Education Secretary, Bridget Phillipson said:

    Skills are crucial to this government’s mission to grow the economy under our Plan for Change, and nowhere is that clearer than in the construction industry.

    We are being held back by the largescale skills shortages in the construction sector which is a major barrier to the delivery of the growth mission.

    These measures will break down barriers to opportunity for thousands of young people, helping them to thrive in – and build – their local communities.

    Today’s announcement will provide £100 million of new investment to fund 10 new Technical Excellence Colleges and £165m of new funding to help colleges deliver more construction courses.

    Skills Bootcamps in the construction sector will also be expanded, with £100 million of funding to ensure new entrants, returners, or those looking to upskill within the industry will be able to do so. All Local Skills Improvement Plan (LSIP) areas will benefit from £20 million to form partnerships between colleges and construction companies, to boost the number of teachers with construction experience in colleges, sharing their vital expertise by training the next generation of workers.

    Construction will also be one of the key sectors that will benefit from new foundation apprenticeships backed by an additional £40 million, which will be launching in August 2025. This will inspire more young people into the construction industry and allow them to progress and specialise in advanced apprenticeships, giving them the tools they need for a sustained and rewarding career. As part of this new offer, employers will be provided with £2,000 for every foundation apprentice they take on and retain in the construction industry, on top of fully funding the training costs through the new Growth and Skills Levy.

    A further £100 million of government funding, alongside a £32 million contribution from the Construction Industry Training Board (CITB) will fund over 40,000 industry placements each year for all Level 2 and Level 3 learners, those studying NVQs, BTECs, T-levels, and advanced apprenticeships. This will help get learners ‘site-ready’ and address the ‘leaky pipeline’ of learners who don’t progress into the sector. The CITB will also double the size of their New Entrant Support Team (NEST) programme to support SMEs in recruiting, engaging, and retaining apprentices.

    An additional £80 million capital fund will support employers to deliver bespoke training based on their needs.

    To ensure employers are able to work collaboratively to secure the workforce needed to meet future demand, the government will sponsor a new Construction Skills Mission Board. Co-chaired by government and by Mark Reynolds, Executive Chair of Mace, the Board will be empowered to develop and deliver a construction skills action plan and provide strategic leadership to the construction sector.

    The government’s communications campaigns continue to promote skills and their contribution to opportunity and growth for individuals and employers.

    In collaboration with the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) through Job Centre Plus, the DfE campaign highlights the construction industry’s value for growth, celebrating employers who contribute significantly to workforce training, and emphasising the benefits of careers in construction. 

    The announcement follows a series of reforms announced during National Apprenticeship Week, including changes to English and maths requirements that will see up to 10,000 more apprentices qualify each year in key sectors, and new shorter apprenticeships. Changes to end point assessments will also mean it is even easier for businesses and providers to support getting people into the workforce.

    Last year the Education Secretary announced new Construction Skills Hubs, funded by industry, which will also speed up the training of construction workers crucial to supporting the government’s homebuilding drive.

    Mark Reynolds, Executive Chair Mace, Co-Chair of the Construction Skills Mission Board and Co-Chair of the Construction Leadership said: 

    This is fantastic news and demonstrates that Government is committed to working with the construction industry to deliver 1.5m homes by the end of this Parliament and its ambitious plans for infrastructure delivery. It’s a hugely significant funding package, and the establishment of the Construction Skills Mission Board will enable us to collaborate with Government to drive change at pace.

    Understandably, construction firms across the country are looking for certainty of pipeline before they commit to investing in new jobs and skills – but this investment by the Chancellor will be critical in giving them the confidence they need. There is now no excuse – industry must embrace the Government’s growth mission and match their ambition.

    Tim Balcon, CITB (Construction Industry Training Board) Chief Executive said:  

    We are delighted with the support the Government is giving the construction sector with increased investment. This package will provide vital support, where it is needed most – it will cut straight to the heart of the construction industry being able to address the challenge of building 1.5m new homes for people that desperately need them.   

    As an industry, we now need to grasp this opportunity and play our part in delivering it. I genuinely believe this is a once-in-a-generation chance to us to recruit and train our workforce – equipping more people with the skills they urgently need now and in the future.

    Steven Boyes, Deputy CEO at Barratt Redrow said: 

    Construction faces a long-standing skills shortage at a time when we are challenging ourselves to build even more much-needed new homes across the country. I started out as a trainee on a Barratt Homes’ construction site 47 years ago, and so welcome this significant, long-term investment in skills, which will create real opportunities for people of all backgrounds to build a successful career in homebuilding.

    Leo Quinn, Balfour Beatty Group Chief Executive and Founder of The 5% Club said:

    We welcome this positive announcement today and the Government’s focus on skills in construction and infrastructure – sectors that are key to driving the UK’s growth. Balfour Beatty and others are investing heavily in skills, but gaps remain, and they’ll only grow as the demand for critical infrastructure – to support clean, secure energy and better connectivity – ramps up. 

    As NISTA takes shape, we’re looking to it to take a holistic view of both skills and supply chain needs to ensure the industry is ready to deliver the infrastructure pipeline. We’re also keen to see the full details of the Growth and Skills Levy, which could make a real difference.

    Updates to this page

    Published 23 March 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: More officers on streets to smoke out illicit tobacco and vapes

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Press release

    More officers on streets to smoke out illicit tobacco and vapes

    More officers trained and funding provided as clampdown on illegal tobacco and vape trade accelerates.

    Tighter and tougher protections to protect children and communities from illicit tobacco and vapes have been unveiled today (Sunday 22 March) as the landmark Tobacco and Vapes Bill moves closer to creating a smokefree UK.   

    A new £10 million boost for Trading Standards will bolster operations in local communities for the next year, to fund an expected 80 more apprentice enforcement officers to stop harmful tobacco and vape products finding their way into neighbourhood shops and stopping underage sales.    

    Officers work closely with local police to take down organised crime groups that operate within networks to supply illegal vapes. Trading Standards plays a key role, operating targeted seizures and sending sniffer dogs to hunt down illicit vapes hidden in shops. 

    Today’s package builds on robust measures in place to tackle illicit tobacco and vapes, including HMRC and Border Force’s £100 million Illicit Tobacco Strategy to crack down on illegal tobacco. Alongside this, the new vaping duty (which will come into force in 2026) will introduce new civil and criminal powers, giving them the ability to seize products and recruit over 200 additional compliance staff.  

    This new funding sits alongside the Tobacco and Vapes Bill which will create the world’s first smoke-free generation, gradually ending the sale of tobacco products to anyone born on or after 1 January 2009 and toughening laws to protect children from addiction.  

    The Bill will also introduce new £200 on the spot fines in England and Wales for breaches of age of sale restrictions, alongside powers to introduce a licensing scheme for retailers to sell tobacco, vape and nicotine products in England, Wales and Northern Ireland.     

    This action delivers on the government’s Plan for Change to create an NHS fit for the future by focusing on the crucial role prevention can take in cutting waiting lists, while also making our streets safer by tackling organised crime. 

    Minister for Public Health and Prevention Ashley Dalton said:  

    Buying illicit tobacco and vapes may save a few pennies in your pocket, but they can be incredibly dangerous and are often linked to criminal activity.   

    It’s vital the Tobacco and Vapes Bill moves forward so we can tackle this illicit trade and free our children from a life imprisoned by addiction. By phasing out tobacco, introducing new restrictions on vapes and putting more boots on our streets, we’re taking the concrete action needed to deliver our Plan for Change and bring us that one step closer to a healthier, smoke-free future.”  

    John Herriman, Chief Executive at the Chartered Trading Standards Institute (CTSI), said:  

    CTSI is very welcoming of the announcement of substantial funding for Trading Standards services across England. This much-needed investment will strengthen our ability to support businesses in complying with current and future tobacco and vaping regulations and will also ensure we are well placed to support the protection of public health. It also reinforces our commitment to taking firm action against anyone who seeks to harm their local communities by choosing to operate outside the law. With these additional resources, we can make a real difference in both keeping consumers safe, and ensuring a fair and responsible marketplace.

    Lord Michael Bichard, Chair, National Trading Standards, said:

    Illicit tobacco and vape products are prevalent in our communities, trapping people – including children and young people – in a dangerous cycle of addiction that could endure for another generation. 

    The scourge of illicit nicotine products are largely powered by organised crime, and the products represent an important money-spinner that help fund organised crime groups’ other illegal schemes, such as human trafficking and modern slavery. 

    While Trading Standards seized more than a million illegal vapes, 19 million counterfeit cigarettes and 5,103kg of illicit hand rolling tobacco last year, further action and resources are needed by enforcement bodies to disrupt supply and clamp down on the perpetrators. The Tobacco and Vapes Bill is an important step in the right direction, providing more resources to a stretched Trading Standards workforce who, alongside other enforcement partners, are working hard to help the government meet its aims for a smoke-free generation.

    Updates to this page

    Published 23 March 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: PM call with Prime Minister Dick Schoof of the Netherlands: 23 March 2025

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Press release

    PM call with Prime Minister Dick Schoof of the Netherlands: 23 March 2025

    The Prime Minister spoke to Prime Minister Dick Schoof of the Netherlands this afternoon.

    The Prime Minister spoke to Prime Minister Dick Schoof of the Netherlands this afternoon.

    The leaders discussed their respective engagements over the past week in support of Ukraine.

    The Prime Minister reflected on his attendance at the UK Permanent Joint Headquarters on Thursday, noting the impressive military co-ordination taking place and looking ahead to further planning meetings this week.  

    Both also agreed that continued political momentum and action, driven by the members of the Coalition of the Willing, is vital to put Ukraine in the strongest possible position for a secure and lasting peace. 

    Moving on to discuss wider European defence and security, the leaders agreed that all countries must step up to meet the mounting threats we face. 

    They added that much closer co-operation on our defensive capabilities will be vitally important in the coming decades in order to protect Europe and secure its future.

    Updates to this page

    Published 23 March 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Interview with Charles Croucher, Channel 9

    Source: Australian Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister for Industry

    Charles Croucher:

    Welcome to the pre‑budget meeting. Just to ask that question, any line dancing in your Queensland days?

    Jim Chalmers:

    No, no. Blissfully free.

    Croucher:

    You’re a bit more hip‑hoppy, weren’t you? We’ve done 4 of these pre‑budget interviews. I’ve asked this question every time, so I’m going to start with it this time. When do things get easier for Australians?

    Chalmers:

    Certainly in the economy things are getting better. But we know that doesn’t always translate to how people are feeling and faring in the economy.

    That’s why when cost‑of‑living pressures are front of mind for so many Australians, they will be front and centre in the Budget that I hand down on Tuesday night.

    It will be a Budget primarily focused on helping people with the cost of living but also making our economy more resilient in the face of all of this global economic uncertainty and building Australia’s future.

    Croucher:

    Resilient? What does that mean?

    Chalmers:

    It means that the world is an uncertain place.

    There’s a lot of unpredictability, a lot of volatility. There’s a new world of uncertainty that we’re seeing unfold right around the globe and for Australia, we’re not immune from that.

    Making us more resilient means a Future Made in Australia. It means a Buy Australia Plan. It means making sure that as we get the Budget in better nick and we help with the cost of living, that we’re also investing in the jobs and industries of the future so that as the world changes all around us, we can be beneficiaries of that change, not victims of it.

    Croucher:

    You mentioned a Buy Australia Plan. This is getting more than just a catch cry or something that the Prime Minister has said in the past. This will be a laid out plan that will encourage Australians to buy Australian. How do you do that when cost is the driving factor? And what does it mean if they do that?

    Chalmers:

    One of the things that the Prime Minister said in response to the tariffs being levied around the world and on Australia was that one of the things that Australians can do, one of the decisions that Australians can make is to buy more Australian products and more Australian produce.

    There will be an opportunity for us to promote that in the Budget. That will be part of the Budget, but more broadly, making the economy more resilient means that Future Made in Australia, means making the most of our industrial opportunities, the energy transformation, human capital and skills and lifelong learning.

    That’ll be a big focus of the Budget as well. But primarily we know that cost of living is front of mind for most Australians, it will be front and centre in the Budget. You’ll see that when it comes to bulk billing, cheaper medicines and also extending the electricity bill rebates.

    Croucher:

    Let’s speak about that. Electricity bill rebates, an extra $150. How does it roll out?

    Chalmers:

    It rolls out in the second half of the year.

    The $300 that rolled out in the course of this financial year has been a really important way that we’ve helped people with the cost of living. This is more hip pocket help for households. It recognises that even as we’ve made all of this progress on inflation together, people are still under pressure and so there’s more help being rolled out on Tuesday night.

    Extending these energy bill rebates for another 6 months recognises the pressures people are under and in the most responsible way that we can, helps people with those pressures.

    Croucher:

    This time last year, I asked you if this was now baked into the Budget, this need for energy bill relief, because when it comes back on, it’s going to be inflationary right? When those subsidies are gone, it will force the price of things up. Is this just now another line item that every Treasurer from now on has to pay?

    Chalmers:

    Not necessarily.

    We keep these cost‑of‑living measures under more or less constant review. This is the third time that we’ve provided energy bill relief, but this time for 6 months rather than 12. That recognises first of all the pressures on the Budget, but also the progress that we are making on inflation.

    The Australian economy is turning a corner. We’ve got inflation down, real wages and incomes are up, unemployment’s low, we’ve got the debt down, interest rates have started to come down, growth is rebounding solidly in our economy. But we know that there’s more work to do because people are still under pressure. The global economic environment is uncertain. The Budget is designed to respond to those 2 things.

    Croucher:

    That all sounds like a really solid election or re‑election pitch, except the OECD say living standards have fallen. Now all those other things should be driving living standards. So, when do they turn around?

    Chalmers:

    They are. All of those things together are driving a recovery in living standards. Don’t forget, when we came to office, living standards were falling sharply, real wages were falling sharply, inflation and interest rates were going up. Now inflation and interest rates are coming down, incomes and wages are recovering, the tax cuts are flowing in our economy and all of that is rebuilding living standards in our economy.

    We recognise that it’s been an especially difficult period under the life of the last 2 governments. And when you recognise that, your choice is whether to do something about it or not.

    We’ve been doing something about it, getting wages moving again, tax cuts for every taxpayer, energy bill relief for every household, cheaper medicines, cheaper early childhood education, rent assistance, all of these ways that we’ve been rebuilding living standards. Because we recognise the pressure you’ve identified in your question.

    Croucher:

    David Littleproud was on the programme 10 minutes ago and he said he’d probably support these. This energy bill subsidy. But he said it is a last desperate roll of the dice from a government who’s lost control of energy prices. Is that right?

    Chalmers:

    Of course not. Energy prices in the last year to December went down by 25 per cent.

    Croucher:

    A lot of that was subsidy.

    Chalmers:

    Not all of it, but prices would have gone down even without the subsidies.

    Croucher:

    So, why is there still a need for subsidies?

    Chalmers:

    Because people are still under pressure, for all of the reasons that you and I have been talking about today and we’ve talked about on other occasions.

    But I say this about the Liberals and Nationals. They say they’ll probably support this cost‑of‑living relief. They haven’t supported the first 2 rounds of cost‑of‑living relief. They didn’t want the tax cuts to flow to every Australian taxpayer. They have opposed at almost every turn our cost‑of‑living help. That’s important for the election contest, because when Australians are doing it tough, the Labor government is helping with the cost of living.

    All they’ve got are these secret cuts that they won’t come clean on. And that’s the difference between Labor and Liberal. Our Budget’s about the cost‑of‑living. Their approach is about secret cuts. This is the week that they need to come clean on what those secret cuts mean for Medicare and pensions and payments and all of the other things that Australians rely on.

    Croucher:

    I want to move on to debt. It goes through a trillion dollars in the next couple of years. That’s been forecast for a while now. Are we at the stage now where any hope of turning surplus budgets is pretty much over?

    Chalmers:

    Not necessarily. We’ve delivered 2 surplus budgets. We took those enormous deficits that we inherited from the Liberal Party and we turned them into Labor surpluses. Even the deficit for this year is going to be substantially smaller than what was expected when we came to office 3 years ago. So, we’re making good progress. We’ve actually helped engineer the biggest ever positive turnaround in the budget in a single parliamentary term. That means $170 billion or so less Liberal debt. That means we save on interest costs.

    We’ve been able to manage the budget responsibly at the same time as we roll out cost‑of‑living help and invest in the future and that’s what you see on Tuesday night as well.

    Croucher:

    The next part of that is the next 10 years are all in deficit. So, we start going backwards and some of that money saved is still going backwards. So, how do we turn that around? It needs something bigger. Is that part of a second term agenda, a third term agenda? When do you look at that and say we can realistically get back into surplus and avoid that huge interest bill that’s coming down the pipeline?

    Chalmers:

    It requires the same combination of responsible economic management that we have been deploying, finding savings and there’ll be more savings in the Budget. Banking upward revision to revenue, most of that, we’ve seen that in the course of our time in office. Making sure that where we are making investments, we’re doing them in the most responsible way that we can. That’s what people can expect to see.

    Croucher:

    I want to be really quick on some, some overseas beef tariffs could be the next thing coming from Donald Trump. Do we have a plan B?

    Chalmers:

    It remains to be seen the nature and the magnitude of the tariffs that the Americans have flagged for early in April. We don’t take any outcome for granted. We work around the clock to make Australia’s case in that context. But we don’t pretend anything other than this is a new world of uncertainty.

    Croucher:

    And you can’t control him. What he can control is here. So, is there a plan B?

    Chalmers:

    What we’re seeing with these escalating trade tensions is casting a shadow over the global economy and over our own economy and our budget.

    Our plan A is about making our economy more resilient. What we’re seeing with all this uncertainty actually vindicates and validates the approach that we’ve taken – help people in the near term get the budget in much better nick and invest in making our economy more resilient. A Future Made in Australia, for example, investing in our industries and our jobs, our resources sector in areas like critical minerals.

    These are all of the most important things that we can do, and we are doing in the Budget in the face of all of this unpredictability around the world.

    Croucher:

    Last question on jobs, you mentioned it then. In our first interview we spoke about this collection of Australians that even though there were jobs available, that the unemployment rate was low, still weren’t out there and still weren’t working. You said it was a passion of yours. It’s something that, you know, the region you grew up in dedicates that. Same with me. How are we going with that?

    Chalmers:

    One of the things I’m proudest of is that we’ve got labour force participation, which is a measure of how many people that we can attract into work, that’s been at or around record highs during our time in office. I’m really proud of that. It’s one of a number of ways that we’ve made very substantial progress together as Australians.

    The stronger the labour market can be, the way that we can reward people by making sure that they can earn more and keep more of what they earn with the tax cuts. All of that is playing a very helpful role in our economy. This makes us exceptional around the world. Most other countries, they’ve got inflation down, but they’ve paid for that progress with much higher unemployment. Our unemployment rate, on average, over the life of this government has been the lowest of any government in 50 years. That means more people in work. It means we can address this intergenerational disadvantage that you and I care so much about.

    Croucher:

    I can hear the Liberals in my ears screaming, it’s lower. It’s now higher than when they left office at 3.9.

    Chalmers:

    Average unemployment, much lower under this government than under our predecessors. In fact, any government of the last 50 years.

    Croucher:

    Jim Chalmers, best of luck on Tuesday. Appreciate your time.

    Chalmers:

    Thanks so much Charles.

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Interview with Andrew Clennell, Sunday Agenda, Sky News

    Source: Australian Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister for Industry

    Andrew Clennell:

    Live at the desk in Canberra before his fourth Budget in a term, he’s just told me he’s the first Treasurer to deliver that since Ben Chifley, is the Treasurer, Jim Chalmers. Thanks for your time.

    Jim Chalmers:

    Good morning, Andrew.

    Clennell:

    Let me start by asking about this energy bill relief. A week ago it was announced power bills were to go up by up to $200 a year, and you’re giving people back only $150. They’re not going to be dancing in the streets over that, are they?

    Chalmers:

    Well, we’re doing what we responsibly can to help people with the cost of living. These cost-of-living pressures are front of mind for a lot of Australians and they’ll be front and centre in the Budget and this energy bill assistance is a bit of extra hip pocket help for households.

    Even with all the progress we’re making as a country together on inflation, we know that people are still under pressure, and this responds to some of that pressure.

    Clennell:

    It looks like an election bribe, really, I mean you’re doing it for 2 quarters, then cutting it off.

    Chalmers:

    I don’t think so. This is the third time that we’ve done the energy bill rebates, 2 lots of $300 and now extending it for 6 months and again it’s about recognising that even with all this progress on inflation, we got inflation from higher than 6 per cent and rising when we came to office, now 2.4 per cent, we know that people are still under the pump and so we’re doing what we responsibly can to help people with the cost of living, not just energy bill rebates, but cheaper medicines, but also this historic investment in bulk billing – because more bulk billing means less pressure on families too.

    Clennell:

    It feels like a big band-aid over a deeper problem with the energy transition.

    Chalmers:

    There are 2 things that we’re doing simultaneously. If you look at the Default Market Offer that was released in the last fortnight or so, one of the big issues there is the unreliability of the legacy parts of the system, and so we need to make sure that we continue to get more cleaner and cheaper and reliable energy into the system – we’re doing that, and in the meantime we’re helping people with their electricity bills.

    Don’t forget in the last year to December in the official inflation data, electricity prices went down by 25 per cent because we’re helping people with their energy bills. We’re extending that for another 6 months because we recognise people are still under the pump.

    Clennell:

    I mean effectively you’re taking people’s taxes and giving them back to them on their energy bills, right?

    Chalmers:

    If you look right throughout the Budget, whether it’s investments in Medicare and bulk billing, whether it’s investments in cheaper medicines, what budgets are all about is taking the country’s priorities, and in this case the government’s priorities – Medicare, cost-of-living, making our economy more resilient – making room in the Budget to do those things. And we’ve helped engineer a stunning turnaround in the Budget, $200 billion improvement in the Budget since we came to office, the biggest nominal improvement of all time and that’s helped us make room for these investments, whether it’s helping with the cost of living or building Australia’s future, or making our economy more resilient in the face of all of this global economic uncertainty.

    Clennell:

    Is any part of this policy an apology to voters for not coming through with that promise to cut their power bills by 275 bucks? In 2022 you yourself recorded on camera really pushing that policy. Is any of this sort of an apology for that?

    Chalmers:

    I’d describe it differently, as you’d expect, and I would describe it as hip pocket help for households. I would describe it as a government responding to the pressures that people still feel despite this progress that we’ve made on inflation. And if you take a step back for a moment, the Budget will be about the progress we’ve made together to here, and a plan to make the most of that progress from here, and part of that plan is rebuilding living standards which were falling sharply when we came to office. That means helping with the cost of living, getting wages moving again, the tax cuts which are already rolling out in the economy. All of this is about recognising that people are under pressure, we can respond to that in a responsible way, and that’s why really the defining feature of our term in government, and certainly the defining feature of Tuesday night’s Budget will be helping with the cost of living.

    Clennell:

    Are you sorry you couldn’t deliver on that now?

    Chalmers:

    We’re always trying to do the best we can for people, whether it’s electricity bills, whether it’s Medicare, strengthening Medicare with these historic investments, whether it’s women’s health, whether it’s cheaper medicines, cutting student debt. There are a whole bunch of ways that we are doing the absolute best we can for people. There’s more than one way to provide cost-of-living help. And here I think it’s really important to draw the distinction and to draw the contrast, and that is this Labor government doesn’t just recognise people are under pressure, we’re doing something about it, it beggars belief that the Liberals and Nationals have opposed that cost-of-living relief at almost every turn, and that means Australians would be even worse off now if Peter Dutton had his way.

    Clennell:

    Jane Hume says they’re going to pass it. What do you make of that?

    Chalmers:

    Well, that will be the first time if it’s the case. I mean they opposed the first 2 rounds of energy bill relief, they didn’t want to see the tax cuts, they opposed our cost-of-living relief

    Clennell:

    What’s your reaction to them passing it this time?

    Chalmers:

    Well, let’s see, let’s see.

    Clennell:

    Well, she’s just said it. She said, “We’re not going to stand in the way of it”, so –

    Chalmers:

    David Littleproud earlier today, I’m told, said that they probably will, which sounds a little bit less than definitive as far as I’m concerned.

    This week, what we will see is the contrast. My budget is about a plan for the economy and helping with the cost of living, the Liberals and Nationals are about secret costs and secret cuts which will make people worse off. This is their opportunity to come clean on the $600 billion they need to find to fund their nuclear reactors and what that means for Medicare and pensions and payments and housing and veterans and all of the other things that they’ve described as wasteful spending.

    Clennell:

    Peter Dutton says power bills have gone up $1,000 since you were elected. Do you dispute that figure?

    Chalmers:

    Well, the most recent data says electricity bills have come down by about 25 per cent.

    Clennell:

    Because of the subsidies.

    Chalmers:

    Partly, but not entirely because of the subsidies. So power bills in 2024 would have gone down 1.6 per cent, instead they went down 25 per cent.

    Clennell:

    Is he right though with the $1,000 figure?

    Chalmers:

    I haven’t checked his numbers. The numbers that we rely on are the official CPI numbers, and what they’ve shown is they’ve come down 25 per cent last year primarily because of our efforts to give people help with the cost of living, and don’t forget, you asked me about Peter Dutton, if Peter Dutton had his way, electricity bills would have been $300 higher last year because he opposed our efforts to help people.

    Clennell:

    In MYEFO there were predictions for real GDP of 2.5  to 2.75 per cent annual growth. Have they been revised up in your Budget?

    Chalmers:

    Well, we’ve revised all of our forecasts in the usual way, and –

    Clennell:

    Are they up?

    Chalmers:

    – you’ll see those in the Budget. What the growth forecasts have to recognise is the weaker growth that we’ve seen in the last little while. Growth is rebounding solidly in the most recent numbers, the private sector’s taking its rightful role as the main driver of that growth but don’t forget we’ve been through an especially soft period of economic growth and so the forecasts have to account for that as well. I’m not prepared to go into the ins and outs of all the forecasts here – there will be changes to forecasts which recognise what we’ve been through to here and what we expect from that.

    Clennell:

    Because obviously, I guess, if they do go up, that can reduce your deficits, right, that’s one aspect of that occurring. Is that what we’re going to be looking at?

    Chalmers:

    Well, don’t forget we’ve also got all of this global economic uncertainty casting a shadow over the world, and also over our economy and our Budget, and so there are always swings and roundabouts in these forecasts, there are always a number of influences.

    The 2 primary influences on our Budget are cost-of-living pressures, despite this progress on inflation, and the global economic uncertainty casting a shadow over the Budget and the economy, and the Budget is really designed to deal with those 2 pressures at once.

    Clennell:

    The MYEFO also showed an increase in deficits – they were up to $47 billion and $38 billion in 25–26 and 26–27. Given some of the campaign promises we’ve seen, are they going to be even higher than that?

    Chalmers:

    What you’ll see in the Budget is that because the midyear budget update was only about 3 months ago, that’s a bit unusual to have them so close together – the bottom lines are broadly similar, there are some changes but broadly similar, and that means it reflects that very substantial progress we’ve made since we were elected.

    If you compare the budget situation now to the preelection outlook in 2022 it’s night and day, we’ve made huge progress, enormous strides cleaning up the mess that we inherited, a $200 billion improvement, 2 surpluses in the first 2 years, a smaller deficit this year than when we came to office, and that’s an important demonstration, I think, of our responsible economic management. You’ll see how the bottom lines have changed a little bit but not a lot on Tuesday night.

    Clennell:

    It feels like you’re back to Australian Treasurer reality a bit. You’ve had the dream, you know, you’ve done the work on it obviously, but you’ve had the dream of presenting a surplus, your old boss Wayne Swan a number of other Treasurers have never had that. Now you’ve got to dole out the red ink. That must be a bit personally disappointing for you.

    Chalmers:

    Oh, I don’t see it in personal terms. Collectively, we are the first government in almost 2 decades to deliver back-to-back surpluses, and we’re also got this deficit now –

    Clennell:

    Does this ruin the story a bit?

    Chalmers:

    I don’t believe so. Our government is defined by responsible economic management. We’ve seen that in the first 3 Budgets, and we’ll see that in the fourth and one of the things I’m proudest about is we’ve got the Budget in much better nick, we’ve cleaned up the mess left to us by our predecessors at the same time as we’ve provided responsible, meaningful, substantial cost-of-living relief and invested in building Australia’s future and that’s really what people can expect to see again on Tuesday.

    Clennell:

    When do you anticipate an Australian Government could next deliver a surplus?

    Chalmers:

    Well, it remains to be seen, and certainly our efforts have been about trying to make the Budget as responsible as we can, some savings, banking most of the upward revision of revenue in our time in office, delivering those 2 surpluses, getting interest costs down, paying down the Liberal debt, but it remains to be seen when the next surplus is.

    Clennell:

    It could be a decade again, couldn’t it? It was 15 years between drinks when you did it. It could be that long again, couldn’t it?

    Chalmers:

    It was almost 2 decades between surpluses but don’t forget the 2 surpluses that we’ve already delivered and paying down all of that Liberal debt as a consequence is saving us tens of billions of dollars in interest costs already and so it’s got a structural purpose to it – it improves the Budget in a structural sense, so do our efforts on the NDIS and aged care and in other ways as well. So we’ve improved the Budget in the near term, we’ve made a structural improvement in the medium term, but the work of Budget repair and responsible economic management continues.

    Clennell:

    The NDIS – Jane Hume mentioned it before – said there needs to be more reform. She actually said it needs to grow at the same amount as the economy, so not the 8 per cent you’ve got it down to from 14 per cent. Is that something you’re committed to longer term?

    Chalmers:

    Well, that’s a new announcement from Jane Hume today. That means huge cuts to the NDIS and that would send a shiver up the spine of a lot of people who rely on the program.

    Now we are way too late in the parliamentary term for these characters to still be making it up as they go along. They’ve got secret plans for cuts. Those cuts will make Australians worse off, we know that.

    Peter Dutton said on another program on a Sunday morning that there are lots of cuts but they won’t tell people till after the election.

    Now this is a very scary proposition. I think in this building we’re tempted to think that their economic policy is some kind of slapstick comedy but it actually masks a much more sinister intent and that is to keep these secret cuts secret until after the election with grave consequences for people on the NDIS, people on pensions and payments, and especially people who rely on Medicare.

    Clennell:

    The NDIS is out of control though, isn’t it? As a Treasurer, you can’t sit and look at the growth of NDIS and be happy.

    Chalmers:

    We’re not sitting and looking at it, we’ve taken very substantial steps over the life of this government to make sure that spending on the NDIS is still growing but growing in a more sustainable way, cracking down on the rorts, getting it from growing at something like 14 per cent to something like 8 per cent, and we’re on track for that.

    Clennell:

    There’s more ways to be tackled though, isn’t there, or is there?

    Chalmers:

    Well, we’re doing it the most responsible, considered, methodical way that we can, and where we find waste, we’ve shown an enthusiasm to deal with that. That’s why we’re getting growth in the NDIS to more sustainable levels.

    Now if Jane Hume is saying that she wants growth in NDIS spending to be between 2 and 3 per cent instead of 8 per cent, then they need to come clean on what that means for Australians with a disability. That is a very scary proposition for a lot of people watching your program today and wondering what it means for them.

    Clennell:

    She also indicated that she is looking to sack 36,000 public servants, because she said she wanted it at the levels after COVID.

    Chalmers:

    Let’s see the detail. They are way past due coming clean on what their agenda for secret cuts means for people, what it means for Medicare in particular.

    I thought 2 things that were said in the last few weeks are very important; both Angus Taylor and Peter Dutton said in different ways, the best predictor of future performance is past performance. Peter Dutton went after Medicare when he was the Health Minister, Coalition governments always come after wages, they cut pensions and payments when they were last in office, and so they need to come clean this week on what are these secret cuts, what do they mean for people, where are they going to find the $600 billion to pay for these nuclear reactors.

    Clennell:

    It leaked during the week the Opposition’s looking at increased defence spending as it promised perhaps 2.5 per cent of GDP. Will there be an increase in defence spending in this Budget?

    Chalmers:

    Well, we’re already increasing it, and it’s already budgeted for.

    Clennell:

    So there’s not a further increase we’re looking at Tuesday?

    Chalmers:

    We’ll update the figures, but what people can expect to see is the existing $50 billion plus that we’re investing in defence over the course of the next decade

    Clennell:

    So correct me if I’m wrong, is that about 2.38 per cent GDP?

    Chalmers:

    A little bit over.

    Clennell:

    Yeah.

    Chalmers:

    By the early 2030s we’ll get defence spending to a bit more than 2.3 per cent of GDP, remembering it’s 2 now, that’s a very substantial increase. Now again, if they’re going to increase defence spending by $15 billion a year, let’s hear how they’re going to pay for it and what they’re going to cut and what that means for Medicare.

    Clennell:

    You finally released the report by the ACCC on the supermarkets, but you know, it’s a bit of damp squib as a consumer, I have to say, I didn’t see any strong action against the supermarkets. The other mob are saying, we’ll at least threaten you with a big stick. What are you actually going to do about it? What difference does this whole process of the ACCC report make?

    Chalmers:

    Well, the ACCC report I think is 441 pages from memory, and not on any of those pages does it recommend divestiture, because divestiture can have unintended consequences.

    What it’s really about is more transparency, more scrutiny and more competition, and we’re acting on all of those fronts; making the Food and Grocery Code mandatory, empowering and funding the ACCC, dealing with mergers and acquisitions, working with the states and territories on zoning and planning so we can get more competitors to the supermarkets.

    We are taking very decisive action to crack down on the supermarkets, to get a fairer go for families at the checkout and for farmers at the farm gate.

    Clennell:

    Are we expecting less or more net migration in your Budget predictions? Why do we need so much migration at the moment, because it feels like we are becoming Kevin Rudd’s Big Australia?

    Chalmers:

    We are managing the net overseas migration numbers down quite considerably. I think we saw, I think it was last week from memory in the migration figures, there were about 10,000 people fewer than what was anticipated. The Budget will update all of those forecasts but what they will show overall is the trajectory is down. That’s deliberate. There was a spike in net overseas migration after COVID, students, tourists and the like and fewer departures. We’ve been steadily managing that down and we saw that in last week’s figures.

    Clennell:

    So will it be 230,000, will it be less?

    Chalmers:

    You’ll see in the Budget.

    Clennell:

    Because the students are still coming in in big numbers, aren’t they?

    Chalmers:

    You’ll see in the Budget.

    Clennell:

    Is it less?

    Chalmers:

    The international student market is an important earner for Australia but it needs to be responsible. We need to make sure that we’re managing that and that’s why we’re trying to take the steps that we are taking. Overall we’re managing the program down, we’re doing that in a considered and methodical way, and you’ll see that in the numbers.

    Clennell:

    What can you say to Australians who look at the strains on housing, on infrastructure that are watching this and hear Peter Dutton saying, “I’m going to slash this”, about why we need this net migration at the moment?

    Chalmers:

    First of all, there’s a horrendous inconsistency even in what Peter Dutton is saying. He announced he was going to do something, then he pretended he never did, then he pretended there wasn’t an inconsistency. Nobody has any idea –

    Clennell:

    Yeah, but let me take you back to the point because we’re nearly out of time, sorry. What would you say to Australians about why we need the level of net migration we’ve been having?

    Chalmers:

    I’d say to them; we’re managing net migration down and we’re building more houses at the same time so that there are more houses for Australians to rent and buy.

    Clennell:

    How are you feeling about the election, because if the government was to lose, you’re favourite to become Opposition Leader.

    Chalmers:

    Look, I spend all of my time thinking about the Budget and the economic plan and what we would do as a government and as a country if we win the election. I spend absolutely no time thinking about what I would do if we lost the election. I’d much rather be the Treasurer of Australia than the Leader of the Opposition. I enjoy the work I do for Anthony and our team. We work very, very closely together, and we want the economy to be front and centre in this election.

    The stakes are high in this election because the stakes are high in the economy. There’s a lot going on around the world, people are under pressure still, we’ve made a lot of progress together, but we’ve got a plan from here as well, and that’s the difference between us and our political opponents.

    Clennell:

    You’re seen as one of the best communicators in the government. Have you ever been frustrated the PM hasn’t been able to communicate as clearly as you do at any time in his term?

    Chalmers:

    No, never, and we’ve got a lot of good communicators in our Cabinet and in our Party Room more broadly and we work together very, very closely with the Prime Minister and with others to put together and convey an economic plan, which is one of the reasons why we’re making so much progress together as a country, but we recognise there’s more work to do, and that’s what the Budget will be all about.

    Clennell:

    Treasurer Jim Chalmers, thanks so much for your time.

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Interview with Ashleigh Raper, Channel 10

    Source: Australian Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister for Industry

    Ashleigh Raper:

    Hello Treasurer, and welcome.

    Jim Chalmers:

    Thanks very much Ash.

    Raper:

    Is this the Budget you didn’t want to do?

    Chalmers:

    I’m looking forward to delivering a Budget on Tuesday night. It’s a Budget which is all about the cost of living, but also making sure our economy is more resilient in the face of all this global economic uncertainty and one way that we can build the future of our economy and our country.

    So, I’m looking forward to handing it down. I know that cost‑of‑living pressures are front of mind for most Australians and cost of living will be front and centre in the Budget.

    Raper:

    So, in this Budget, you are promising to extend the energy bill rebate before the end of the year. So, an extra $150 off bills. What’s the rationale behind it? How did you arrive at the extra 6 months?

    Chalmers:

    The broader rationale is that even with the progress that we’ve made together as Australians on inflation, we know that people are still under pressure so we’re helping where we responsibly can. Strengthening Medicare, because more bulk billing means less pressure on families making medicines cheaper, as the Prime Minister announced in the last few days.

    But also extending these energy bill rebates, we know that they have played an important role in taking some of the edge off cost‑of‑living pressures. This is more hip pocket help for households. It’s about recognising that even with all that progress on inflation, Australians are still under pressure and we’re responding to it.

    Raper:

    Is it a mistake for Labor to promise to lower electricity bills by $275 in the lead up to the last election? And has that plagued you and you’ve had to deal with that throughout this term?

    Chalmers:

    I’m not going to get into the political analysis of that. We’ve been working around the clock to ease cost‑of‑living pressures despite the opposition of the Liberal and National parties.

    Raper:

    But do you concede it’s a broken promise, essentially?

    Chalmers:

    We’ve been working around the clock to take pressure off household energy bills. You asked me about $275. We took $300 off last year. $300 for a lot of Australians the year before, at the same time as we’re introducing more cleaner and cheaper, more reliable energy into the energy grid.

    So, I know that there’s a lot of focus on that. There’s a lot of focus from the government in taking the edge off these electricity bills. That’s what this announcement that we’re making today to extend energy bill release for another 6 months is all about.

    Raper:

    Last week we said there’d be few surprises because you’ve already made some promises in the lead up to the Budget. You’re also going to keep some for the campaign. Is this energy bill extension the only new cost‑of‑living relief we see this budget week?

    Chalmers:

    No, there’s also cheaper medicines, making the medicines on the PBS substantially cheaper.

    Raper:

    That was last week, I’m saying this week.

    Chalmers:

    There’s a real focus in the Budget on cost of living. We’re cutting student debt, it’s about cost of living. We’re strengthening Medicare because more bulk billing helps address some of these out‑of‑pocket health costs. We’re making medicines cheaper, we’ve got big new investments in women’s health and we’re extending the energy bill rebates.

    And again, this is because we understand that cost of living is still front of mind for Australians even with all this progress on inflation. Cost of living is front and centre in the Budget and that’s why we’re making these investments.

    Raper:

    One of your favourite sayings to get a sound bar is that you turn Liberal deficits into 2 Labor surpluses. We’re now going to get a Labor deficit. How are you going to explain that to voters?

    Chalmers:

    It remains the case that we turn 2 enormous Liberal deficits into 2 Labor surpluses. The first government in almost 2 decades to deliver those back‑to‑back surpluses. But even this year where we do expect a deficit, it is much smaller than what we inherited from our predecessors. That’s because one of the defining features of this Albanese Labor government, has been responsible economic management.

    We’ve helped engineer the biggest improvement in the Budget in a single term of any government ever in dollar terms. That means less Liberal debt and less interest being paid on that debt. It helps make room for us to provide this cost‑of‑living help to invest in the future and make our economy more resilient at a time when there is a new world of uncertainty around the globe.

    Raper:

    But you are doing a lot of extending. The energy rebate extension, the $8.5 billion incentives for Medicare, bulk billing. There’s been billions for roads, rails. Are there any savings in this Budget?

    Chalmers:

    There are savings in the Budget, but it’s also important to remember that most of the announcements that we’ve made between the mid‑year budget update and now have been already provisioned for in that mid‑year budget update. For example, the announcement we’re making today to extend the energy bill rebates, was provisioned in the mid‑year budget update in December about 3 months ago.

    So, we are managing the economy and the budget in the most responsible way that we can. We’re making these investments, but also making room for these investments by banking up or provisioning the revenue over our time in office, delivering those surpluses in our first 2 years, finding savings where we can so that we can fund this cost‑of‑living relief and these key investments.

    Raper:

    So, has revenue like a bump in income tax, is that what has helped fund some of these units?

    Chalmers:

    There’s a very small increase in revenue in the Budget as a consequence of all of the factors, but much, much smaller than we’ve seen in earlier years – and that will all be detailed on Tuesday.

    Raper:

    Has the US President Donald Trump kept you up at night as you prepare this Budget?

    Chalmers:

    Well, certainly the escalating trade tensions around the world have been a big concern for us. What we’re seeing out of DC but also out of Beijing, 2 major conflicts, political uncertainty, and division around the world. All of that is casting a shadow over the global economy and over our Budget.

    The 2 big influences on the Budget as we put the finishing touches on it, have been cost‑of‑living pressures and global economic uncertainty – so we are concerned about it. We’re a very trade exposed economy. We’ve got a lot of skin in the game when it comes to these escalating trade tensions. That’s why a big focus and a big priority of the Budget is to make our economy and our communities and our workers more resilient in the face of all these external shocks.

    Raper:

    Has it changed any of the forecasts or expectations in this Budget?

    Chalmers:

    It’s certainly changed the expectations. Some of the forecasts have been updated and some of them are broadly the same. But in the language of the economists, they talk about the risks being tilted to the downside.

    What that means is even where we’ve left forecasts, broadly where they were in terms of American growth, for example, there are a lot of risks that that could get worse rather than better. A lot of economists have identified that risk.

    Raper:

    Now, the Albanese government has long talked about wanting to build a universal early education system. As the numbers person, the money man, is this feasible? Can it be achieved in the next term or beyond?

    Chalmers:

    It can certainly be achieved and that’s our aspiration, that’s our objective. But you need to get there in incremental steps, big incremental steps, and that’s what we’re doing.

    The 2 big announcements we’ve made on early childhood education, the 3‑day guarantee, for example, but also the new money to build new centres, non‑profit centres, in areas where there’s a deficiency or shortage of early childhood education. These are really big, really important steps towards universality.

    The Prime Minister, the Ministers, myself and others, we are huge believers in the transformational, transformative impact of early childhood education. We think it’s a game changer for families and for children and for our country more broadly. That’s why we’ve been such enthusiastic, multi‑billion‑dollar investors in getting closer and closer to universality.

    Raper:

    The government makes a lot about the gender parity for those sitting around the cabinet table, those in the Labor caucus, and how important it is to have women around the table and what it leads to, the decisions. Is there anything new specific for women in this Budget?

    Chalmers:

    We made it very clear that there’s a big game changing investment when it comes to women’s health. One of the things I’m proudest of in this Budget is the work that Katy Gallagher and Mark Butler and Ged Kearney and other colleagues have done to make these huge investments in women’s health in areas that have been neglected for too long, frankly. That’s one of the most important things that we will fund on Tuesday night.

    The announcements that we made on women’s health, we’re very proud to do that in addition to everything else we’re doing to get women’s wages moving again to fund pay increases in industries dominated by women, investments in women’s safety. A very big and central priority of this government and this Budget is to do the right thing by the women of Australia. I think where people will notice that most substantially is when it comes to women’s health.

    Raper:

    This is your fourth budget. Has it got easier or harder over this term in terms of identifying your priorities?

    Chalmers:

    I think the priorities are clear. We’ve never had a problem identifying priorities. Cost‑of‑living help, Future Made in Australia, lifelong learning and education, strengthening Medicare. Our priorities have been clear, and our priorities have been validated and indicated by the progress that Australians have made together. So, the priority setting is easy. Making it all add up is more difficult. Each budget has got its own share of challenges, and this has been no different.

    Raper:

    Do you think you’ll be delivering a fifth budget?

    Chalmers:

    That’s up to the voters. It remains to be seen. I don’t take any outcome in any election for granted, least of all this one. It will be tightly contested; it will be close.

    I hope that the economy is front and centre in the election contest because it’s really a choice between Labor helping with the cost of living and with a substantial detailed economic plan in the Budget versus the Coalition who have secret cuts that they won’t come clean on and won’t tell people what that means for Medicare or pensions and payments. That’s a choice at the election.

    The stakes at the election are really high, and that’s because the stakes in the economy are really high. We’ll be setting out our plan in detail with dollars attached. It’s time for our political opponents to come clean on their cuts and how much worse off people will be as a consequence.

    Raper:

    Treasurer, thank you.

    Chalmers:

    Thanks, Ashleigh.

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Interview with Patricia Karvelas, Afternoon Briefing, ABC

    Source: Australian Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister for Industry

    Patricia Karvelas:

    For more on this, I want to bring in the Assistant Minister for Competition, Andrew Leigh. Andrew Leigh, lovely to speak to you.

    Andrew Leigh:

    Likewise, Patricia. Thanks for having me on.

    Karvelas:

    Now, a lot of Australians would probably fear – perhaps a little disappointed – that the report doesn’t suggest price gouging has occurred given people’s lived experience and worry that business as usual for the big 2 will occur after this. Is that a fair assessment?

    Leigh:

    Well, the report’s pretty harsh on the majors. I don’t think they’ll like it, but I think a lot of Australians will. It shows very clearly that the big supermarkets are among the biggest in the world and that they have increased their market share in the 17 years since we last had a supermarket report.

    It shows too, that there’s a bit of high‑low pricing going on where the majors take it in turns to put items on special with a sort of seesaw pattern, which looks pretty suspicious to me.

    The report makes very clear that the government’s approach of a mandatory Food and Grocery Code has been the right one, that we are on the right track with working with the states and territories on planning and zoning, and that we need to continue our action in tackling shrinkflation where the majors have become Olympic champions.

    Karvelas:

    The report says it’s not a duopoly, it’s an oligopoly. But Coles and Woolworths are among the most profitable supermarkets in the world. Does it concern you that they are that profitable? Does that demonstrate something about what’s going on here?

    Leigh:

    Absolutely, Patricia. I want families to get a fairer deal at the checkout, and I want farmers to get a fair deal at the farm gate. And that’s why we’ve got the mandatory Food and Grocery Code, the work we’re doing on shrinkflation, but also why we fund CHOICE to do quarterly grocery price monitoring, so people can see where they’re getting the very best deal.

    And it’s why we’re providing $3 million for training for suppliers, particularly those fresh produce suppliers so they can take advantage of Labor’s new mandatory supermarket code when it comes into effect next month.

    Karvelas:

    The ACCC did find that both Coles and Woolworths have a limited incentive to be competitive on prices, so without serious intervention or a serious kind of a big stick – something that they feel fear or fearful about, how does that actually change?

    Leigh:

    Yeah, I think that’s a really astute question Patricia. We’ve seen over the course of the last 17 years the rise of Aldi, but we’ve also seen the fall in Metcash. And as a result, we’ve seen the big 2 supermarkets actually increase their combined market share.

    What the ACCC recommends is we look hard at planning and zoning in order to create the opportunity for a new player if it was to come in to be able to start up. People will remember Kaufland made an attempt to enter the Australian market, and that would have brought welcome competition. We also have Costco and Amazon as potential competitors, and the report makes clear that we need the right competition settings to allow new competitors to pressure the majors in order to keep prices as low as possible.

    Karvelas:

    The regulator has also recommended the supermarkets provide more transparency in their negotiations with fresh produce suppliers. They found that there’s a bargaining imbalance, right? That’s essentially what their conclusion was. So, what does transparency there look like? Like, how would transparency be achieved?

    Leigh:

    Yeah, so what’s going on Patricia is that the fresh food suppliers are required to sign an annual contract, but then week to week they’re engaging in auctions around what the prices will be. And the ACCC has said that there ought to be price transparency as to what the prices are that come out of those auctions.

    And so farmers can say ‘well, I’m not getting a great deal from Coles, I’m going to go to Aldi or to Woollies’. That gives them greater power, and alongside the additional funding for supplier training and the new anonymous complaints process they’ll be able to make through the ACCC under Labor’s new mandatory supermarket code, that will help tilt the scales in favour of suppliers. Because let’s be honest, for too long, the supermarkets have been stacking the shelves in their favour.

    Karvelas:

    The ACCC said it had been unable to stack up claims that the big 2 were sitting on parcels of land to keep out competition. That’s been talked about as land banking. So, are you certain that they’re not doing this?

    Leigh:

    There’s a lot of sites that are being held. I think the draft report referred to about 100 sites which are being held, and so that’s certainly something we need to keep an eye on. And that’s why we’ve set up this work with the states and territories through getting National Competition Policy back on track.

    The Commonwealth has put aside $900 million into a productivity fund, which goes to things like ensuring that states and territories have competition front of mind when they’re doing planning and zoning.

    That hasn’t always been the case, as you know Patricia. But getting a competition lens across decisions like this makes sure that consumers get the best deal. We’re holding the supermarkets in check so Australians get the best deal at the checkout.

    Karvelas:

    Now, this report has landed, obviously, at the 11th hour before an election so we’re not going to get, sort of law reform before the election. There are very different policies being offered by you and the Coalition on this.

    David Littleproud, who is the Nationals leader and has really been pushing for divestiture powers, addressed this today and said that this is a report that’s been delivered that’s essentially politically palatable to you. I just want you to respond to that criticism that this is a report that essentially lets the government off the hook.

    Leigh:

    Well, that’s a shocking slur on the independent ACCC which worked hard on this report. David Littleproud’s, of course spitting in the dummy. Because this report has found what every other serious competition report has found. The Harper Review, the Hilmer Review, the Dawson Review, the Emerson Review – none of them recommended divestiture powers, and this report does not either.

    The difference between David Littleproud and Labor is we’re interested in solutions that work. He’s interested in slogans. The mandatory supermarket code which Labor put in place was voted against by the Liberals and Nationals.

    David Littleproud and his mates set up a voluntary toothless code of conduct and that’s what they wanted to continue. It took Labor to put in place a code with multi‑million dollar penalties over the votes of the Liberals and Nationals.

    Karvelas:

    He says that without that big stick and without the sort of fear of divestiture that we’re not going to see big change. Could he have a point?

    Leigh:

    He’s all hat and no cattle. The fact is the divestiture powers are very rarely used around the rest of the world, and a big stick that sits in the shed isn’t going to have very much impact on what you do.

    Really, we’re focused here on the measures that will make a difference for Australians. Measures which will help achieve results, like getting food inflation down to about half what it was when we came into office. Food inflation was running at 5.2 per cent when we took office Patricia. We’ve managed to get that down quite considerably.

    For the first time in a very long time, we’ve managed to get these additional powers for suppliers, which they just didn’t have under the Liberals and Nationals who took a hands off, laissez faire approach to this. It’s taken Labor to step on the side of the farmers and the side of the families to get both a better deal.

    Karvelas:

    I want to ask you just a couple of other questions because we’ve got a Budget coming and you have an economic hat, not a sort of farmer’s hat but an economic hat after your last hat comment, I want to talk about structural reform of the budget.

    Every day there’s another spending announcement, and some of the spending may be very worthy. So I don’t want to have a debate about whether the spending is worthy or not, because I think cheaper medicines people would probably want delivered. But there seems to be no strategy for paying for it. Are we going to see that strategy on Tuesday?

    Leigh:

    No look, I think that’s really unfair on Jim, Katy and the team that have worked to put this Budget together. The deficit that you’ll see is significantly smaller than the deficit that we inherited from our predecessors. And that follows 2 surplus Budgets where we have made difficult decisions in order to get spending under control to crack down on the rorts and waste that we inherited from the Liberals and Nationals.

    This is a Budget which is fiscally responsible, which aims to make investments for the future, which contains a big focus on dynamism and competition because we understand we need to get productivity going again.

    Ultimately, it’s that economic growth in the economy Patricia which will allow us to work towards paying down debt. That’s the very best way of managing to grow the economy. And I know that a pro‑growth progressive like Jim Chalmers is always thinking about those issues.

    Karvelas:

    Sure, growth is very important – no one would dispute that. But you have to make some tough decisions. Are they being put off until after the election? I mean, I would ask this to any Coalition people too.

    It seems to me that there is no serious discussion about the way that the budget looks in the years ahead. And we are clearly spending more than we’re taking in.

    Leigh:

    No, look, I don’t think that’s a fair critique. If you look at what we did in multinational taxation for example, no government has taken more action on multinational tax than ours. We closed the debt deduction loophole. We put in place a floor on global company tax. We’ve put in place transparency measures like country‑by‑country reporting.

    All of this is aimed at increasing the tax take and making sure multinationals pay their fair share, which also has a competition benefit too because then Aussie small businesses aren’t going up against multinationals with one hand tied behind their backs. So, that’s been an area of serious tax reform for us.

    Of course, changing the personal income tax cuts so every taxpayer got a tax cut, but within the same budget envelope was a key decision we took last year, opposed by the Liberals and Nationals but ultimately in the interest of the Australian people.

    Karvelas:

    Just finally, big tech have been lobbying the Trump administration to put tariffs on us for our approach to, you know, making them pay in our country. What’s your message to big tech? Are you prepared to take them on?

    Leigh:

    We certainly have been. The social media minimum age laws that were passed through last year were a marker of that. And the News Media Bargaining Code ensures that those platforms which benefit financially from great journalism make a financial contribution towards it.

    You know, these are sensible measures which don’t seek to curtail the platforms that many of us use and benefit from, but which recognise that in a modern economy we need the rules to advance, to keep pace.

    Karvelas:

    Do you expect that big tech will, you know, some of these bosses –Elon Musk – there are others will insert themselves into our election campaign?

    Leigh:

    I certainly hope not. I think we ought to be running an election which is free of foreign interference and one which is a contest of ideas. Now of course Patricia, I hope that in every single election, you don’t always see it, but we need to remember that goal and that the Australian democracy really is an extraordinary creation. We’re great democratic innovators, and part of that democratic innovation is ensuring we can have a contest of true ideas and strong policies.

    And, you know, I really hope the Liberals and Nationals actually start coming up with some of those policies, because I think it’s good for the nation when we have competing policy portfolios, not just a government with a big agenda and strong ideas against an opposition with hot air and a bunch of slogans.

    Karvelas:

    Andrew Leigh, lovely to speak to you. Thank you.

    Leigh:

    Likewise, thanks Patricia.

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Interview with Peter Stefanovic, Sky News

    Source: Australian Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister for Industry

    Peter Stefanovic:

    A year‑long ACCC investigation into the power of Coles and Woolies has revealed that they are some of the most profitable retailers in the world, but no findings regarding price gouging.

    Joining us live now is the Treasurer, Jim Chalmers. Treasurer, thanks for your time this morning. So let’s start off with the government response to this.

    Jim Chalmers:

    Good morning, Pete. This is an important piece of work from the ACCC. We commissioned this work, and we’re pleased to see it released, and what it shows is what we need when it comes to supermarkets is more scrutiny, more information and more competition, and we are already acting on each of those fronts.

    We are cracking down on the supermarkets because we don’t want to see the supermarkets treat Australians like mugs. We know that a big part of the pressure that people feel is at the checkout, so we are keeping the supermarkets in check, checkout, and this ACCC report will help us as we continue to do that.

    Stefanovic:

    How exactly are you keeping them in check, because as they say, it’s an oligopoly?

    Chalmers:

    This report covers a 5‑year period, it says that these price rises beginning in 2021, so covering the life of 2 governments, it says that these price rises started to slow in 2024, which is consistent with what we’re seeing with the inflation figures. Food inflation’s come down from 5.9 per cent when we came to office to 3 per cent now, so slower.

    But people are still under pressure, and so whether it’s our Budget next week, our government more broadly, the big focus is on the cost of living, and cracking down on the supermarkets is part of that.

    We’ve made the Food and Grocery Code mandatory, we have empowered and funded the ACCC to apply more scrutiny, we’re working with the states on planning and zoning to make it easier for new competitors to enter the market. We’re funding CHOICE, we’re doing a whole bunch of things, we’re reforming the unit pricing code, which is about shrinkflation which drives people absolutely nuts.

    We’re doing about half a dozen really important things, consistent with the recommendations of the report today. We are cracking down on the supermarkets. We do want to make sure we get a fair go for farmers and families, and that’s what all of our efforts on supermarkets and cost of living more broadly are all about.

    Stefanovic:

    Right. That $3 million education campaign though, what’s that actually going to do to help consumers and businesses?

    Chalmers:

    First of all, that’s not all we’re doing. We funded the ACCC an extra $30 million. The $2.9 million we’re announcing today is all about educating and helping suppliers, so effectively farmers and their peak organisations to train up their people to get a better deal when they’re negotiating with the supermarkets.

    Stefanovic:

    But the supermarkets –

    Chalmers:

    And the Food and Grocery Code –

    Stefanovic:

    – will just disregard that, won’t they, because they’re just too powerful.

    Chalmers:

    They’re engaged in a negotiation, and we want to tool up and beef up the skills and abilities of the people doing the negotiating. But that’s not all we’re doing on this front. Making the Food and Grocery Code mandatory was all about a fair go for farmers and families as well.

    There are a range of things that we are doing. The recommendations released by the ACCC, we welcome them, we accept all of them in principle, we’re acting on a range of them already, because we do acknowledge that we need to apply more competitive pressure in the supermarket sector. We’re doing that, but the ACCC will inform the work that happens from here as well.

    Stefanovic:

    Okay, just – ‘cause we’re almost out of time, but I want to get you on this story this morning about big tech now pushing Donald Trump to target Australia over our laws on social media and the digital economy. They claim these laws are causing them to sacrifice revenue. What’s the government’s response to this, this morning?

    Chalmers:

    First of all, it’s not surprising that the tech giants would have that view, but our job, and we embrace this, is to make decisions in Australia’s national interest, to protect kids online – for example – or to make sure that there’s a level playing field in our media with our media organisations, so those are our motivations there.

    We’re not surprised that from time to time the tech giants will have different views about that. But our job is to implement the best set of arrangements that we can to look after Australians online.

    Stefanovic:

    Right. I mean we also saw this with big pharma this week, but when it comes to big tech, I mean Tump’s got Musk, Zuckerberg, Bezos, all in his corner. I mean what sort of a chance do we have against that?

    Chalmers:

    I’m obviously not privy to the conversations that they have with President Trump from time to time, it’s self‑evident that they’re very close with the US Administration. Our focus and our job is to make our case in the US, as we have been doing, but to also make sure that we continue to make the best decisions that we can for Australia.

    I think a lot of people around the country – not just parents, but including parents – they want to make sure that there are appropriate protections for people online. The tech giants won’t always like that, they won’t always agree with that, but we’ve got to do that job on behalf of the people of Australia, and there will be different views about how we go about that as we roll it out.

    Stefanovic:

    All right. Treasurer, Jim Chalmers, thanks as always for your time.

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: ASIA/SOUTH KOREA – Thirty years of commitment, prayer and hope for reconciliation and peace

    Source: Agenzia Fides – MIL OSI

    Archdiocese of Seoul

    Seoul (Agenzia Fides) – On the main altar of the Cathedral of Seoul stands the symbol of the local Church for the Holy Year: the “Cross for Peace,” handcrafted from barbed wire taken from the “Bamboo Curtain” in the Demilitarized Zone separating North and South Korea along the 38th parallel. In front of this symbolic cross, the 30th anniversary of the founding of the “Korean Committee of the Archdiocese of Seoul for Reconciliation” (KRCAS) was celebrated with a Mass commemorating 30 years of commitment and invoke peace and reconciliation.”In 1995, fifty years after the division of the country and 45 years after the Korean War, the year in which Cardinal Stephen Kim Sou-hwan officially expressed his desire to visit North Korea, the Committee for Reconciliation of our Archdiocese was established,” said Archbishop Peter Chung Soon-Taick of Seoul, the current chairman of the KRCAS. The Archbishop, who is also Apostolic Administrator of Pyongyang, reflected on the committee’s 30-year history, which has always strived to keep alive, on moral, cultural, and spiritual levels, the flame of reconciliation and the hope for a definitive peace and reunification of North and South Korea. In its 30 years of existence, the committee has engaged in prayers, educational initiatives, research, cooperation projects with the North, and a special and ongoing moment of communal prayer: the Eucharist for the Reconciliation and Unity of Korea, celebrated every Tuesday at the Catholic Myeongdong Cathedral in Seoul, which has now been celebrated for the 1457th time.Regarding current inter-Korean relations, the Archbishop lamented that “the current situation on the Korean peninsula is dominated by the mechanism of hatred, conflict, and division, rather than love, reconciliation, and unity.” Therefore, he urged everyone to “take courage so that we can continue on our path of national reconciliation and remember our mission for peace in this country: inter-Korean reconciliation and the evangelization of all people.”In his homily during the Mass in Seoul, attended by more than 400 faithful, priests, religious, lay people, and North Korean refugees, Archbishop Chung called for conversion “so that hearts may be changed.” He urged the committee to “take the initiative and join forces with other religions, civil society, political circles, as well as other organizations and members of the Church to walk the path of conversion in both North and South Korea.”The Apostolic Nuncio to Korea, Archbishop Giovanni Gaspari, said at the ceremony: “Amid the current tensions and conflicts on the Korean peninsula, your efforts to open a new chapter of reconciliation are more valuable than ever. The Holy See follows these efforts with great attention and joins in prayer for the peaceful reunification of the Korean peninsula” and hopes that the committee’s work “will bear even richer fruit in the pursuit of peace and reconciliation, and that through its activities, the spirit of reconciliation and unity will be further spread.” During the ceremony, the committee also awarded certificates of merit and recognition to individuals who have distinguished themselves through their commitment to the cause of reconciliation and peace on the Korean Peninsula.The Korea Committee for Reconciliation of the Archdiocese of Seoul was established on March 1, 1995, the 50th anniversary of the liberation from Japan, by the late Cardinal Stephen Kim Sou-hwan, then Archbishop of Seoul and Apostolic Administrator of Pyongyang, with the goal of promoting the Church’s responsibility for reconciliation work on the Korean Peninsula. Based on principles such as “transforming hatred into love, discord into reconciliation, and division into unity,” the Committee carried out initiatives centered on three pastoral areas: prayer, peace education, and sharing. Meanwhile, the Committee also established an affiliated research center, the Institute for Peace-Sharing, with a specific academic, social, and cultural research mandate.Every year, the Committee and the Institute organize a special youth pilgrimage called “The Wind of Peace,” which takes place along the Demilitarized Zone on the border between the two Koreas and aims to raise awareness among young people around the world about being apostles of peace. (PA) (Agenzia Fides, 22/3/2025)
    Share:

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Update II: Police in contact with missing group near Oodnadatta

    Source: New South Wales – News

    Police along with other government agencies will be recovering the group of four stranded people in the Far North this morning.

    Shortly after 4pm yesterday, contact was made with a group of four missing people who had become stranded in the outback after suffering mechanical issues with their car. The group had left Oodnadatta on Friday at 4pm, believed to be heading to Finke in the Northern Territory. However, concerns were raised when the group had failed to arrive.

    Supplies were provided to the group including food and a telephone, and plans were made to recover them today.

    Police have maintained contact with the group overnight, and resources are stationed in the Far North, and at the earliest opportunity this morning, these resources will return to the area the group were located to recover them.

    More updates will come to hand when available throughout the day.

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI Africa: Wealthy Africans often don’t pay tax: the answer lies in smarter collection – expert

    Source: The Conversation – Africa – By Giovanni Occhiali, Research Fellow at the Institute of Development Studies, Institute of Development Studies

    Faced with some of the worse debt levels in over a decade, African countries are struggling to find ways to balance their books. Increasing revenue sources from their citizens is an obvious place to look.

    A good starting point for African countries would be to focus on the tax contribution of wealthy citizens. This is because the most under performing taxes across the African continent are those bearing on the income of wealthy individuals, namely personal income and property taxes.

    The reasons for this are two fold: People who are better off in some countries often remain invisible to tax authorities. This is even though they have higher tax liabilities. Compare this with citizens who have formal labour contracts. Think of public school teachers or supermarket clerks. Their taxes are withheld by their employers. This makes tax evasion impossible. Most taxes on personal income in Africa are paid by citizens in these forms of employment.

    In contrast, prior to 2015, only one of the top 71 Ugandan government officials and 17 of the country 60 most successful lawyers paid any personal income tax. Similarly, only 16% of all landlords identified in Freetown, the capital of Sierra Leone, during a registration drive in 2021 had registered for taxes.

    This shows that wealthy Africans face lower effective tax rates than average citizens, replicating a trend already demonstrated for the relative tax burden of small and large companies.

    This situation is disheartening. But there are immediate steps that African revenue authorities can take to address this unfairness.

    Research led by the International Centre for Tax and Development, to which I have contributed, shows that revenue increases from wealthy citizens can be obtained by focusing on better enforcement of existing taxes rather than by introducing new ones or hiking tax rates.

    An effective approach to increase wealthy citizens tax contribution relies on three strategies:

    • their identification

    • a simplification of tax compliance processes, and

    • the effective enforcement of existing taxes.

    While these suggestions might seem banal, they can lead to some quick revenue gains: as much as US$5.5 million in Uganda or US$900,000 in a single Nigerian state in one year, or tripling property tax revenue collection in Sierra Leone.

    But these improvements require changes in the way African revenue authorities operate.

    Tax collection services need change of focus

    Revenue services in all African countries need to be better resourced. A typical tax officer on the continent might be responsible for as many as 10 times the number of taxpayers than a tax officer in the Global North.

    First, their efforts need to be redirected away from the registration of small informal businesses. These efforts have been shown to contribute little revenue in countries as diverse as South Africa and Sierra Leone.

    Instead their efforts should be directed a developing a definition of high-net-worth individual appropriate for their domestic context. In Uganda this includes criteria such as having performed land transactions of approximately US$300,000 over five years, or earning approximately US$150,000 in rental income in any given year.

    Due to its federal structure, criteria in Nigeria vary across states, for example including an yearly income above Naira 2 million in Borno and Kano state, with the threshold raising to Naira 15 million in Imo state, Naira 20 million in Niger state and Naira 25 million in Lagos state.

    However, in both countries criteria also cover less directly measurable assets, such as owning high-value commercial forestry or animal ranches in Uganda, or having received contracts from the government in Nigeria’s Kaduna state.

    Property taxes are especially important. Research in Ethiopia and Rwanda shows that investing in real estate represents one of the main strategies to store wealth when inflation and foreign exchange fluctuation make bank deposits unattractive.

    These properties then contribute to increasing the income of wealthy citizens who rent them out or resell them for profit. While we lack granular data on capital gains or rental income taxes, there are good reasons to think they are also significantly underperforming. Capital gains refers to the additional value which an investor accrues when disposing of assets such as houses or companies share previously bought at a lower price.

    Second, this should be followed by the creation of an office to follow the affairs of high net-worth individuals. This already happens for large taxpayers. Most countries, including the majority of anglophone African countries, have a dedicated office following the tax affairs of large companies active in their territory.

    Having dedicated resources for high net-worth individuals would be useful because using the international definition (a net worth of US$1 million) might be hard to operationalise. The reason for this is that most revenue authorities lack detailed data on assets owned by their taxpayers. Even when they know some information, such as the number of houses, estimates of their market value might be lacking.

    African countries are better off relying on data already in their possession as they seek to collect further useful information on their taxpayers. This allows the establishment of a set of multiple core and non-core criteria.

    Third, high-net worth individual units require substantial backing. In the first instance from revenue authorities’ senior management, who in turn needs to have the support of the government in pursuing often well-connected individuals. This backing is needed for actions as apparently easy as obtaining data from other government agencies, without which identification efforts could be quickly thwarted, and becomes crucial when its time to move to enforcement.

    However, a cooperative approach should be the initial choice. One approach is voluntary disclosure programmes with associated tax amnesties. These are useful to obtain information about the assets of wealthy citizens. Additionally, they contribute substantial revenue – as much as US$296 million in South Africa and US$192 million in Nigeria.

    Fourth, requiring candidates running for public office to obtain tax clearance certificates can also be an important source of information and revenue. This has been shown to work in both Uganda and Nigeria.

    This set of actions represents an optimal starting point for African countries looking to improve the tax contribution of wealthy citizens.

    Efforts to produce suitable guidance for wealth taxation for low-income countries by the United Nations, or to introduce a global wealth tax on billionaire by the Brazilian G20, are important to highlight the role of fiscal redistribution in addressing inequality. But many African countries are better off by first being bold about the basics of their tax systems, which can already make them more effective and progressive.

    – Wealthy Africans often don’t pay tax: the answer lies in smarter collection – expert
    – https://theconversation.com/wealthy-africans-often-dont-pay-tax-the-answer-lies-in-smarter-collection-expert-252437

    MIL OSI Africa

  • MIL-OSI Africa: Secretary-General’s message on World Meteorological Day [scroll down for French version]

    Source: United Nations – English

    he dark predictions of meteorologists are coming to pass. Our climate is going up in flames. Every one of the last ten years has been the hottest in recorded history. Ocean heat is breaking records. And every country is feeling the effects – whether scorched by fires, swept by floods, or pummelled by unprecedented storms.
     
    The theme of this year’s World Meteorological Day – Closing the Early Warning Gap Together – reminds us that, in this new climate reality, early warning systems are not luxuries. They are necessities and sound investments – providing an almost ten-fold return. Yet, almost half the world’s countries still lack access to these life-saving systems. It is disgraceful that, in a digital age, lives and livelihoods are being lost because people have no access to effective early warning systems.

    The United Nations Early Warnings for All initiative aims for everyone, everywhere to be protected by an alert system by 2027. The world must come together, and urgently scale-up action and investment, to realize this goal.

    We need high-level political support for the Initiative within countries, a boost in technology support, greater collaboration between governments, businesses and communities, and a major effort to scale-up finance. Increasing the lending capacity of the Multilateral Development Banks is key. The Pact for the Future agreed last year made important strides forward, it must be delivered in full. So must the COP29 finance outcome.

    At the same time, we must intensify our efforts to tackle the climate crisis at source – through rapid and deep cuts to greenhouse gas emissions – to prevent it getting unimaginably worse. This year all countries must honour the promise to deliver new national climate action plans that align with limiting global temperature rise to 1.5 degrees Celsius.

    In an era of climate disaster, every person on Earth must be protected by an early warning system as a matter of justice. Together, let’s deliver. 

    ***

    Les sombres prévisions des météorologues sont en passe de se réaliser. Notre climat s’embrase. Les dix dernières années ont été les plus chaudes jamais enregistrées dans l’histoire de l’humanité. Les océans connaissent des niveaux record de chaleur. Incendies ravageurs, inondations dévastatrices ou tempêtes sans précédent : aucun pays n’est épargné par les effets des changements climatiques.

    Cette année, la Journée météorologique mondiale est placée sous le thème « Combler ensemble les lacunes en matière d’alertes précoces », qui vient nous rappeler que, dans cette nouvelle réalité climatique, les systèmes d’alerte précoce ne sont pas un luxe. En plus d’être indispensables, ils représentent des investissements judicieux, puisque les bénéfices qui en découlent sont pratiquement dix fois supérieurs aux montants investis. Pourtant, près de la moitié des pays de la planète n’ont toujours pas accès à ces systèmes d’une importance vitale. À l’ère du numérique, il est déplorable que des personnes perdent la vie ou voient leurs moyens de subsistance anéantis faute d’avoir accès à des systèmes d’alerte précoce efficaces.

    L’initiative « Alertes précoces pour tous » de l’Organisation des Nations Unies vise à ce que chaque habitant de la planète soit protégé par un système d’alerte d’ici à 2027. La communauté internationale doit unir ses forces et accroître d’urgence ses efforts et ses investissements pour atteindre cet objectif.

    Il est primordial que chaque pays accorde à l’initiative un soutien politique de haut niveau, qu’un appui plus énergique soit offert sur le plan des technologies, que les gouvernements, les entreprises et les communautés resserrent leur coopération et que les financements connaissent un véritable bond. Il est également crucial d’accroître la capacité de prêt des banques multilatérales de développement. Le Pacte pour l’avenir, adopté l’an dernier, a permis de poser des bases solides ; il doit maintenant être appliqué pleinement. Il faut également concrétiser les engagements pris en matière de financement à la vingt-neuvième session de la Conférence des Parties à la Convention-cadre des Nations Unies sur les changements climatiques (COP 29).

    Dans le même temps, il nous faut redoubler d’efforts pour chercher à résoudre la crise climatique à la source, en réduisant rapidement et fortement les émissions de gaz à effet de serre, afin d’éviter que la situation n’empire dans des proportions inimaginables. Cette année, tous les pays doivent honorer leur promesse de présenter de nouveaux plans d’action nationaux pour le climat qui soient compatibles avec l’objectif consistant à limiter le réchauffement planétaire à 1,5 degré Celsius.

    À l’ère des catastrophes climatiques, il faut que chaque personne sur Terre soit protégée par un système d’alerte précoce ; il s’agit là d’une question de justice. Ensemble, donnons corps à cette ambition.

    ***
     

    MIL OSI Africa

  • MIL-OSI USA: Attorney General Bonta Issues Statement on President Trump’s Troubling Attacks on the Rule of Law and U.S. Constitution

    Source: US State of California

    Sunday, March 23, 2025

    Contact: (916) 210-6000, agpressoffice@doj.ca.gov

    OAKLAND – California Attorney General Rob Bonta today issued the following statement in response to President Trump’s troubling attacks on the rule of law and U.S. Constitution: 

    “More than two centuries ago, our founding fathers established three co-equal branches of government; each branch designed to act as a check on the others and curb the misuse of power by those in higher office. Today, that foundational tenet of American democracy is being stress-tested.  

    The Trump Administration has repeatedly attempted to exercise authority it does not have – authority that belongs to Congress or the states – and in doing so, violated clear legal requirements set forth in the law and in the U.S. Constitution. These actions have required the co-equal judicial branch to order the Trump Administration to follow the law. At times, the Trump Administration has acted in contravention of those court orders. 

    These actions are both unlawful and dangerous. Our constitutional democracy rests upon a legal system in which attorneys dutifully represent their clients, facts and law are presented to judges, and after careful consideration, those judges issue orders that must be followed. 

    Attacks to undermine due process, discredit or intimidate our independent judiciary, undercut state sovereignty, or seek retribution against those who dare exercise their First Amendment right to take positions different from – or in opposition to – the President are either unlawful, inconsistent with the foundational principles of our American legal system, or both. 

    President Trump’s demands for the co-equal judiciary to capitulate to the executive branch are not normal. His decree threatening sanctions and retaliation against attorneys and law firms he dislikes is not normal. These actions threaten the very foundations of our democracy, legal system, and the rule of law.  

    We must continue to speak up and push back when our democratic norms are violated, our legal system undermined, and our laws broken. We must hold the President and his Administration accountable to the Constitution they swore to uphold. As California Attorney General, I promise I will.”

    # # #

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: New safety push to protect young Australians overseas

    Source: Australia’s climate in 2024: 2nd warmest and 8th wettest year on record

    The Australian Government is strengthening its efforts to increase awareness of alcohol related risks of overseas travel, launching a dedicated advertising push to reach young Australians.

    Best friends Bianca Jones and Holly Bowles tragically died last year from drinking alcohol tainted with methanol while on holiday in Laos. No family should have to go through the pain of losing a child or a loved one in this way.

    From next month, Smartraveller will roll out dedicated communications to raise awareness and educate Australians of the signs of methanol poisoning, how to protect themselves from drink spiking and broader alcohol safety – knowing the risks and watching out for your mates.

    The campaign will ramp up across peak travel periods and school and university holidays, and include:

    • Targeted advice and alerts to young travellers, including school leavers, and their parents through social media, text messages and messaging at Australia’s international airports.
    • A new online safety hub on Smartraveller will be established by June 2025, which will host resources aimed at schools, universities and parents.
    • Ahead of schoolies, a new advertising campaign will reach young people through the channels they use most including social media across multiple platforms and digital audio. Youth media engagement and partnerships will also be used to amplify these messages.
    • Working closely with airlines and others in the travel industry to enhance the reach of these public service messages to young Australian travellers, focusing on certain destinations and regions.

    The Australian Government will also work with education institutions and non-government organisations such as Red Frogs and the Nicole Fitzsimmons Foundation to deliver alcohol safety messaging through presentations to school students.

    We want young Australians to watch their drinks and watch out for their mates overseas. We urge them to stay vigilant and check Smartraveller.gov.au for the latest updates.

    The Australian Government has consistently called for a transparent and thorough investigation into the deaths of Bianca Jones and Holly Bowles, and the Foreign Minister has made these expectations clear to the Lao Government.

    We continue to press Lao authorities for progress on the investigation.

    Quotes attributable to Minister for Foreign Affairs Penny Wong:

    “The families of Holly and Bianca are foremost in my mind today, and also the many families of other Australians who have lost loved ones.

    “We want our children to be curious and explore the world – but above all else, we want them to be safe.

    “These efforts will help young Australians travelling overseas to protect themselves from methanol poisoning, drinking spiking and other alcohol harms.”

    Quotes attributable to Assistant Minister for Foreign Affairs Tim Watts:

    “Alcohol consumption can result in tragedy in Australia but there are additional and different risks overseas.

    “The Australian Government’s increased messaging and targeted advice to young travellers, including school leavers and their parents through social media will help raise awareness of the serious and varied risks from alcohol consumption overseas.”

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI Banking: African Development Bank, United Nations Development Programme, and Partners to host Regional Dialogue on Modernising Transparency and Accountability…

    Source: African Development Bank Group
    What:       High-Level Regional Dialogue on Public Finance Systems in Africa
    Who:        United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), African Development Bank Group (AfDB), United Nations Economic Commission for Africa (UNECA), and the government of the Republic of Benin
    When:      25 – 26 March 2025;…

    MIL OSI Global Banks

  • MIL-OSI Banking: No child should be forced to choose between hunger and education, King Letsie III and African Development Bank President Adesina declare

    Source: African Development Bank Group
    A school feeding organization in Kenya, Food4Education, left King Letsie III of the Kingdom of Lesotho and the President of the African Development Bank Group, Dr. Akinwumi Adesina, so impressed that they made impassioned appeals to governments and corporate leaders to do more to end classroom hunger. 

    MIL OSI Global Banks

  • MIL-OSI: Crypto Whales Are Watching These 3 Altcoins – Should You Buy In Too Before the Charts Reset

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    PANAMA CITY, March 23, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — LF Labs token has captured significant attention this week as whale activity drives its price up by 13.37%, with trading volume spiking to $13.33 million. This surge has fueled speculation about the token’s potential for continued growth, as it outperforms many Ethereum-based alternatives. With increasing listings on major exchanges like Gate.io and MEXC, alongside its strong performance in DeFi markets, LF Labs is quickly emerging as a top pick for investors. As the $LF token gains momentum, crypto whales are signaling that it could be the next big breakout altcoin of 2025. Investors seeking to explore next-generation altcoins should keep a close eye on LF Labs as it positions itself for even greater potential in the coming months.

    Meanwhile, Uniswap (UNI) and PancakeSwap (CAKE) continue to attract whale interest, reinforcing the growing momentum in decentralized finance (DeFi) markets.

    Uniswap (UNI) Gains Momentum as Whale Confidence Grows

    Uniswap’s platform has received substantial investment from whales which resulted in a 3900% increase in large holder netflow within a seven-day period. The market has shown an optimistic shift through heavy investor participation in UNI’s value potential at a time of general market instability. The dollar value of tokens decreases as retail traders buy into the market thus reinforcing price stability.

    UNI Large Holders Netflow. Source: IntoTheBlock

    Market participants follow UNI’s performance because its decentralized exchange features continue to retain value through changing market conditions along with rising decentralized exchange requirements. The whale-led whale purchase demonstrates market positivity and expert analysts predict a temporary price increase. Lengthy investor interest in this pattern suggests the token will surpass comparable assets when moving forward in trading sessions.

    The increase in transactions from large wallets serves as an essential sign for potential UNI price appreciation while it captures investor attention regarding decentralized finance technologies. The combination of enhanced trading volume along with depleted availability creates conditions that could draw new investor interest in UNI. Core DeFi protocol exposure has attracted investors because of UNI’s improving conditions.

    PancakeSwap (CAKE) Rises as Meme Coin Activity Grows

    Previously dormancy-based wallets that contained significant amounts of CAKE have recently increased their activity measurements on PancakeSwap. A remarkable acquisition of 101 million CAKE tokens worth more than $250 million during the last 24 hours by whales has sparked inquiries about an upcoming strong return. The market interest in the token grows because BNB Chain has demonstrated increased meme coin trading volume.

    DEX users find PancakeSwap more attractive because decentralized trading platforms experience rising popularity enabling CAKE to become a leading selection for active virtual currency traders. The activity has established a conducive market condition that suggests CAKE may recover its value in upcoming days. Analysts observe investors showing more enthusiasm since major investors actively purchased tokens.

    CAKE Supply Distribution. Source: Santiment

    Persistent accumulation could give CAKE the chance to break out of its falling trend, which would then entice retail buyers to join. The Binance ecosystem depends on the token because it provides its users with both trading flexibility and increased liquidity. According to market analysts, short-term profitability becomes possible through sustained whale purchases.

    LF Labs ($LF) Emerges as the Top Pick Among Crypto Whales

    LF Labs’ $LF token leads whale interest this week with a 13.37% daily price jump, now trading at $0.0007578. The token’s market activity reached high levels when trading volume reached $13.33 million which elevated its volume-to-market-cap ratio to 579.58%. These figures confirm crypto whale confidence in LF Labs’ future performance and fundamentals.

    Source: CoinMarketCap

    The performance of the $LF token reached 121.90% during the past week, surpassing numerous Ethereum-based tokens in the market. 3 billion tokens presently circulate under a $6.24 million market capitalization, which indicates robust development possibilities for LF Labs. A valuation analysis of $20.80 million demonstrates major potential growth because the total possible supply of tokens surpasses current circulation levels.

    Several whale investors purchase $LF due to its cheap entry point, fast trading growth, Gate.io listing, and valuable practical applications. LF Labs has also introduced tailored liquidity solutions, 24/7 support, and global partnerships with over 700 projects. LF Labs represents a partnership between Alliance DAO Crypto Fund and passes the Certik audit standard while integrating innovation and transparent practices.

    The company known as Lovely Finance transitioned to LF Labs and delivered better brand recognition through solid building blocks and strengthened alliances. The company operates as a central DeFi growth engine through its distinctive market-making strategy and solutions that enhance scalability within Web3 ecosystems. The multiple cryptocurrency exchanges where LF Labs lists enhance both accessibility and liquidity because of growing interest from traders.

    Users who wish to trade LF Labs tokens can do so through Gate.io, HTX BitMart, and MEXC platforms. The project’s mission for a data-powered Web3 integration remains strong while LF Labs advances its worldwide expansion. People looking to invest in next-generation altcoins should consider LF Labs because its prospects are unmatchable before crypto price charts restructure.

    Contact:
    John Ellen
    CEO
    support@lflabs.fund

    Disclaimer: This press release is provided by LF Labs token. The statements, views, and opinions expressed in this content are solely those of the content provider and do not necessarily reflect the views of this media platform or its publisher. We do not endorse, verify, or guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of any information presented. This content is for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial, investment, or trading advice. Investing in crypto and mining related opportunities involves significant risks, including the potential loss of capital. Readers are strongly encouraged to conduct their own research and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. However, due to the inherently speculative nature of the blockchain sector–including cryptocurrency, NFTs, and mining–complete accuracy cannot always be guaranteed. Neither the media platform nor the publisher shall be held responsible for any fraudulent activities, misrepresentations, or financial losses arising from the content of this press release. Speculate only with funds that you can afford to lose. Neither the media platform nor the publisher shall be held responsible for any fraudulent activities, misrepresentations, or financial losses arising from the content of this press release. In the event of any legal claims or charges against this article, we accept no liability or responsibility.

    Legal Disclaimer: This media platform provides the content of this article on an “as-is” basis, without any warranties or representations of any kind, express or implied. We do not assume any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information presented herein. Any concerns, complaints, or copyright issues related to this article should be directed to the content provider mentioned above.

    Photos accompanying this announcement are available at

    https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/03ce3938-ad3a-47b3-8a56-1c5076b98697

    https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/4dfbfad7-2ed4-4e24-96ba-7065487cbff5

    https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/fe1f593d-ef02-42c3-9d64-819174e1eadf

    The MIL Network