NewzIntel.com

    • Checkout Page
    • Contact Us
    • Default Redirect Page
    • Frontpage
    • Home-2
    • Home-3
    • Lost Password
    • Member Login
    • Member LogOut
    • Member TOS Page
    • My Account
    • NewzIntel Alert Control-Panel
    • NewzIntel Latest Reports
    • Post Views Counter
    • Privacy Policy
    • Public Individual Page
    • Register
    • Subscription Plan
    • Thank You Page

Category: Politics

  • MIL-OSI USA: 84 Mass Metrology Seminar

    Source: US Government research organizations

    Credit: OWM/K. Dill

    Course Description

    The Mass Metrology Seminar is a two-week, “hands-on” seminar.  It incorporates approximately 30 percent lectures and 70 percent demonstrations and laboratory work in which the participant performs measurements by applying procedures and equations discussed in the classroom.  The seminar focuses on the comprehension and application of the procedures, the equations, and calculations involved.  The seminar includes the operation of the laboratory equipment, review of publications, standards, specifications, and tolerances relevant to the measurements.  Training covers mass calibration procedures published in NISTIR 6969 and NISTIR 5672 and are suitable for the calibration of mass standards to OIML R111 Class E2 through M3 tolerances, ASTM classes 1 through 7 and NIST HB 105-1 Class F.  Training is provided to enable the participant to correctly identify and implement the correct calibration process for each weight classification.  Each procedure and the entire seminar incorporates concepts covered in the Fundamentals of Metrology seminar, especially, concepts related to metrological traceability, statistical analysis, measurement assurance methods, uncertainty analyses, software validation, and generation of ISO/IEC 17025 compliant calibration certificates for all measurements made during the seminar.

    Learning Objectives

    At the end of this seminar, using Standard Operating Procedures 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 29, 30, and 34 and Good Measurement Practices 10, 11, 12, and 13 participants will be able to:

    • IDENTIFY mass artifacts and use appropriate procedures to ensure good quality, accurate, traceable mass measurement results;
    • EXPLAIN highlights and key concepts of each topic to each other and to your managers using the slides and reference materials; and
    • PERFORM mass calibration procedures, use and validate the job aids, and use reference materials to perform laboratory calibrations, including hands-on handling of mass standards and balances, calculation of measurement results, integration of measurement assurance, uncertainty analysis, and software validation to produce valid calibration results and certificates.

    Note regarding course level and expectations:  This course is conducted equivalent to a university-level course and is part of our IACET-accredited processes with requirements to demonstrate successful achievement of learning objectives within each module.  Significant time outside of the classroom and laboratory is expected and is commonly reported (1 hour to 2 hours per day) to complete homework, reading, data entry, and creation and editing of calibration certificates. Students should avoid trying to meet other obligations while attending this course as much as possible.

    Materials & Supplies

    Participants are encouraged to bring template versions of the mass calibration certificates issued by their laboratory as a starting point for the calibration certificates to be submitted during the seminar. Alternatively, participants should bring the calibration certificate they generated during the Fundamentals of Metrology seminar as a starting point. The former is recommended! Feedback and suggested changes to ensure ISO/IEC 17025 compliance will be provided during the seminar. Generation of calibration certificates will be required, so come prepared. A number of notebooks and course materials will be provided, so please ensure you have extra luggage space to carry these items.

    Prerequisites

    Successful completion of the Fundamentals of Metrology Seminar is a prerequisite for the Mass Metrology Seminar. The Mass Metrology Seminar is built on the concepts learned during the Fundamentals of Metrology Seminar, applying units, measurement uncertainty, measurement assurance, traceability, and Quality Management System concepts to the mass calibration procedures.

    Pre-Work

    It is strongly recommended that you complete the Basic Mass Metrology CD as it will give you a head start on the Mass Seminar, including exposure to the contents of NISTIR 6969, Selected Laboratory and Measurement Practices, and NISTIR 5672, Advanced Mass Calibrations and Measurements Assurance Program for the State Calibration Laboratories. Completing the NIST SP 1001 should take 16 to 40 hours. Participants are encouraged to read and comprehend as much as possible the content of NISTIR 6969 and NISTIR 5672 regardless of completing NIST SP 1001.

    NOTE:  Additional reading pre-work and Excel preparation recommendations may be sent by the instructor prior to the seminar. Extensive use of Excel is made in this course; strong familiarity with equation entry and validation is essential.

    Post-Work

    Laboratory Auditing Program (LAP) problems are assigned at the completion of the course to those metrologists who participate in the NIST OWM State Laboratory Program.  Acceptable completion of the problems is required for NIST Office of Weights and Measures Laboratory Recognition in support of mass calibrations.  (See Handbook 143, Program Handbook training requirements as updated here.

    Minimum Requirements

    To receive a Training Certificate for this course, successful completion requires participants to actively participate in the entire course (e.g., 100 % attendance, take notes, engage in discussions, ask questions), complete all classroom, homework, and application exercise assignments, successfully perform mass calibrations as evidenced by measurement results entered in course control charts and calibration certificates, and pass a written final exam.  In addition, students submit a series of calibration certificates that are graded based on SOP 1 and NIST SP 811 criteria, as evidence of completion of all application exercises conducted during the hands-on portion of class exercises.

    *Homework note: students generally report taking one to two hours for homework each night.

    Audience

    This training seminar is open to industry and government metrologists.

    Cost

    The current registration fee for this seminar is $6,200 and confirmed participants will be sent payment instructions.  This registration fee does not cover travel, lodging, or meal costs.  Registration fees for State weights and measures regulatory officials and metrologists are funded by NIST OWM.

    Instructors

    Elizabeth Koncki, Michael Stocker, and Jose Torres
    Email: elizabeth.koncki [at] nist.gov (elizabeth[dot]koncki[at]nist[dot]gov)

    Technology Requirements

    • Registered participants must provide a notebook computer for the Mass Metrology Seminar and be well trained in the development and use of spreadsheets for complex repetitive calculations.
    • Participants must have access to Microsoft Excel (versions 2010 and later are acceptable) and can open and effectively create their own spreadsheets to perform calculations, and use template Excel workbooks that will be provided on USB media.  Be aware that for networked access of Microsoft files, access to the NIST network is not ensured (e.g., it can be problematic if using a version of Office 365 that requires network access to operate properly.) 
    • Participants must have administrative rights for the computer so that that files can be transferred to and from it as required by the seminar exercises through the use of USB memory sticks:  You must also be able to save/store files to USB media devices to facilitate printing and turning in classwork.  Internet and network access is not assured during the seminar.  Students without administrative approvals or ability to use USB media are encouraged to contact the instructor before the class to discuss alternatives (e.g., using a personal laptop, using a RW/CD,  or other alternatives.)   Students need to verify the capability to run executable files to ensure successful access and use of the software needed in this course.  If not able to use USB media, participants must be able to upload files to a secure NIST Box and/or Google Drive and/or Microsoft SharePoint data transfer cloud service.
    • Availability of a scientific calculator (minimum 12 digits) may be useful as a supplement to Excel; if using a calculator, familiarity with its operation is essential.

    All visitors must be preregistered and present photo identification and vehicle registration information upon arrival. NIST can only accept a state-issued driver’s license or identification card for access to federal facilities if issued by states that are REAL ID compliant or have an extension.

    Photo I.D. Requirements for Citizens

    • Effective May 7, 2025, agencies can only accept a state-issued driver’s license or identification card from states that are compliant with or have an exemption for the REAL ID Act.  See the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) site to confirm if your ID is compliant (https://www.dhs.gov/real-id/are-you-real-id-ready). 
    • NIST currently accepts other forms of federally issued identification in lieu of a state-issued driver’s license, including an original passport, passport card, DOD Common Access Card (CAC), Veteran ID, Federal Agency HSPD-12 IDs, Military Dependent ID, Transportation Workers Identification Credential (TWIC), and TSA Trusted Traveler ID.

    Foreign Nationals

    • Lawful Permanent Resident visitors must present their Permanent Resident Card (Green Card) upon arrival. Non-Permanent Resident visitors must present a valid passport (original only) upon arrival. 
    • All forms of ID must be original. No photocopies are permitted.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    February 21, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Russia: Polytechnic summed up the results of RAFU activities in 2024

    Translartion. Region: Russians Fedetion –

    Source: Peter the Great St Petersburg Polytechnic University – Peter the Great St Petersburg Polytechnic University –

    In mid-February, a general meeting of the participants of the Russian-African Network University consortium was held online. They summed up the results of their activities for 2024 and agreed on a work plan for 2025. The event was attended by Deputy Director of the Department of International Cooperation of the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia Stepan Sokolov, Vice-Rector for International Affairs of SPbPU Dmitry Arsenyev, Head of the RAFU Project Office Maxim Zalyvsky, Secretary of the RAFU Presidium, Deputy Director of International Cooperation Alla Mazina, Honorary Consul of Mali in St. Petersburg, Associate Professor of the Higher School of Hydraulic Engineering and Power Engineering Issa Togo and more than 70 representatives of 40 Russian universities participating in RAFU.

    Stepan Sokolov noted that Russian-African relations have a long history, where cooperation in science and higher education has always occupied a significant place and often became an important link between our countries and peoples. Hundreds of thousands of African students have received high-quality higher education in Russia.

    Today, many African countries show a noticeable interest in strengthening and developing cooperation with the Russian Federation. This is evident at various levels: from the willingness to improve the regulatory framework to active participation in international forums and bilateral meetings. However, we cannot stop there. It is necessary to constantly expand the horizons of opportunities and develop cooperation. First of all, with focus countries such as Algeria, Egypt, Ethiopia, Mali, Guinea, Burkina Faso, Guinea-Bissau, Niger and Nigeria, Stepan Aleksandrovich emphasized.

    A promising direction also seems to be the development of cooperation between the RAFU consortium and the African Union and African universities, primarily in terms of training African teachers.

    The activities of SPbPU within the RAFU consortium have become an important vector of development, corresponding to the geopolitical interests of Russia. In a year and a half, we have given new dynamics to cooperation with African countries, expanded the geography of the consortium and made the RAFU brand recognizable in the international arena. We have not only restored the domain and updated the content of the site, but also turned it into an educational portal, posting more than 120 online courses for African colleagues, – noted Dmitry Arsenyev.

    This work has already yielded results. The number of participants has doubled, and the geography of cooperation has covered 15 African countries. RAFU participates in major international forums. This year alone, its members took part in such events as the World Festival of Youth and the Congress of Young Scientists in Sochi, the St. Petersburg Economic Forum, the BRICS Education Ministers’ Meeting in Moscow, the Russia-Africa Partnership Forum, and many others.

    The participants of the general meeting highly appreciated the work of the consortium and Polytechnic University as its coordinator. In 2025, RAFU will continue to work on developing cooperation and expanding the geography of the consortium’s activities on the African continent.

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    MIL OSI Russia News –

    February 21, 2025
  • MIL-OSI United Nations: IOM Aims to Aid Two Million People in Ukraine in 2025 as War and Displacement Continue 

    Source: International Organization for Migration (IOM)

    Kyiv/Geneva, 21 February 2025 – As the full-scale war in Ukraine approaches its fourth year, the International Organization for Migration (IOM) is appealing for USD 255 million to support two million war-affected people in the country in 2025.  

    Nearly a third of Ukraine’s population needs humanitarian support, and internally displaced persons and returnees are among the most vulnerable. According to the latest IOM report, nearly two-thirds of Ukraine’s 3.7 million internally displaced persons have been away from their homes for more than two years, and tens of thousands of people continue to leave their homes behind every month as they escape from frontline areas, primarily in the east and northeast of Ukraine.   

    Many of those displaced have depleted their savings and they lack income opportunities, making it difficult, if not impossible, for them to afford food, medicine and other essentials.   

    About 4.2 million people have returned from displacement, a quarter of them reported having returned from abroad. Compared to non-displaced people, returnees are more likely to spend their savings, accept low-paid jobs, and sell their belongings to meet basic needs.  

    IOM has been working in Ukraine and neighbouring countries to provide critical aid and other support that can enable communities impacted by the war to recover.   

    In Ukraine, IOM is helping to improve living conditions and ensure continued access to services by rehabilitating homes and social institutions, including health clinics and collective centres that are being used as temporary shelter sites. IOM is also donating medical equipment to hospitals, and providing mental health and psychosocial support to people in distress, among other initiatives. Over the past three years, more than six million people in Ukraine have benefitted, directly and indirectly, from IOM’s humanitarian interventions and recovery initiatives.  

    In countries that are hosting refugees from Ukraine, IOM supports governments, local authorities and civil society organizations with refugees’ inclusion into local communities, fostering their economic independence through language courses, skills development, and employment support. IOM also continues to address the basic needs – housing, food, clothes, medication, psychosocial support – of newly arriving Ukrainians or those who experience challenges in accessing government assistance. Since February 2022, over 980,000 refugees in neighbouring countries have received direct support and two million people indirectly benefitted from IOM aid.  

    IOM and its local partners in Ukraine have also helped over 37,000 survivors of human trafficking, exploitation, and war-related human rights violations such as torture, arbitrary detention, and war-related violence. The aid provided includes medical and psychological support, shelter and food, and connecting survivors with dignified work.   

    IOM calls on donors and partners to continue contributing to longer-term solutions to reduce communities’ reliance on humanitarian aid in Ukraine and to prepare the ground for the next steps. Among the most pressing needs are repairing, restoring, and upgrading critical public infrastructure such as energy, water, sanitation, heating, shelter, and affordable housing, as well as creation and retainment of jobs.  

    Together with the international community IOM stands ready to continue providing support, for as long as is necessary, to all Ukrainians in need.  

    Note to Editor:  

    Click here for IOM’s 2025 Crisis Response Plan for Ukraine   

     

    For more information, please contact:   

     

    In Kyiv: Varvara Zhluktenko, vzhluktenko@iom.int    

    In Vienna: Keith Begg, kbegg@iom.int   

    In Brussels: Ryan Schroeder, rschroeder@iom.int   

    In Geneva: Amber Christino, achristino@iom.int   

    MIL OSI United Nations News –

    February 21, 2025
  • MIL-OSI China: China’s top legislature to expedite legislation promoting private economy

    Source: China State Council Information Office 2

    China’s top legislature will conduct a second reading of the draft private economy promotion law next week and will then solicit further opinions from various sectors to refine the draft.
    Efforts will be made to ensure the prompt deliberation and adoption of the law, a spokesperson for the Legislative Affairs Commission of the National People’s Congress Standing Committee said on Friday. 

    MIL OSI China News –

    February 21, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Economics: Panasonic in Numbers: Panasonic HX

    Source: Panasonic

    Headline: Panasonic in Numbers: Panasonic HX

    Panasonic Manufacturing UK Ltd. (Location: Cardiff, Wales, UK; hereinafter referred to as “PMUK”), which develops, manufactures, and sells microwave ovens and other products in the UK, has completed the installation and begun trial operation of a demonstration power generation system. The microwave oven assembly factory is powered by renewable energy generated by the system through the integrated control of three types of energy sources: pure hydrogen fuel cell generators, photovoltaic generators, and storage batteries. This demonstration system, the first of its kind outside Japan, will bring Panasonic HX to scale with the Group seeking to build relationships with government agencies, local partner companies and business customers related to the hydrogen business to establish a foundation that will contribute to UK society and climate change countermeasures in the UK and across Europe.
    This demonstration uses green hydrogen produced in the UK for in-house power generation and aims to supply 100% of the electricity consumed in PMUK’s microwave assembly from renewable sources by means of pure hydrogen fuel cell generators using green hydrogen, in combination with photovoltaic generators and storage batteries. This globally unique initiative integrating the three energy sources into a demonstration facility is the first attempt even for Panasonic. Through this demonstration, Panasonic is committed to developing its hydrogen business from a long-term perspective toward the realization of a future hydrogen society and carbon neutrality.

    The content in this website is accurate at the time of publication but may be subject to change without notice.Please note therefore that these documents may not always contain the most up-to-date information.Please note that German, French and Chinese versions are machine translations, so the quality and accuracy may vary.

    MIL OSI Economics –

    February 21, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Senator Murray on Senate Republicans’ Pro-Billionaire Budget Resolution, Trump and Musk’s Devastating Funding Freeze and Mass Firings

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Washington State Patty Murray

    Murray: “Republicans are going down this partisan path because they know Democrats are not going to join them in throwing Medicaid, nutrition assistance, and veterans’ benefits into the wood chipper so they can throw more tax cuts at billionaires and the biggest corporations.”

    Murray: “We should not be taking kids out of child care to give billionaires a tax break. We should not be taking food off the family table to put more fuel in private jets.”

    ICYMI: Senator Murray speaks at Budget Committee markup of resolution, offers common sense amendments rejected by Republicans

    ***VIDEO HERE***

    Washington, D.C. — Today, U.S. Senator Patty Murray (D-WA), Vice Chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee and a senior member and former chair of the Senate Budget Committee, took to the Senate floor to forcefully speak out against Senate Republicans’ budget resolution that will help billionaires at working families’ expense—as well as the Trump administration’s lawless mass firings and ongoing funding freeze that is hurting people and jeopardizing critical services they need in every part of the country. She also underscored how a clean full-year CR is not an acceptable solution to government funding.

    Senator Murray’s remarks, as delivered, are below:

    “Thank you M. President. We need to be focused on solving problems—and I think most of us here get that.

    “No matter who the President is, our constituents expect us to work for them. They expect us to fight for them. And they expect us to do the hard work of passing laws to make their lives better.

    [TRUMP LEAVING FARMILIES IN THE DUST]

    “People don’t send us here to make their lives worse. But that’s exactly what Trump and Musk are doing. They are looking at our most pressing problems—and making them so much worse. And this budget proposal will only add fuel to the fire.

    “Right now—even as egg prices hit an all time high—Trump and Musk have done nothing to lower prices.

    “They’ve done nothing to address the housing crisis, or help families get quality, affordable child care—or address other issues I hear about from folks all the time.

    “Instead, they are slashing programs that help our families make ends meet, they are gutting an agency that saves working people money and protects them from scams, and starting trade wars that will impose what is effectively a Trump sales tax entirely on the backs of American workers.

    “As China works to strengthen its global leadership, Trump and Musk have ceded the ground almost entirely—illegally cutting off investments we make to continue our country’s leadership and help allies.

    “At the most precarious moment for the Middle East in decades—Trump is casually proposing to ethnically cleanse Gaza so that Trump and his family can build waterfront property there.

    “When it comes to helping our allies in Ukraine secure a just peace—Trump is giving away countless concessions to Putin out of the gate, calling our ally a dictator and meeting with Russia without inviting Ukraine.

    “When it comes to the Bird Flu—Trump and Musk are firing the very workers who are responsible for tracking the disease and keeping it from spreading further. And now, suddenly, they are desperately trying to hire them back.

    “And as Texas deals with a serious measles outbreak, Trump’s Health Secretary can’t even confirm the obvious, and tell parents the vaccine doesn’t cause autism—which, to be clear, it does not!


    “And, almost unbelievably, just weeks after the deadliest commercial plane crash in the U.S. in over two decades—Trump and Musk are firing FAA workers who make sure flying is safe. Who does that help?

    “And now Trump is letting Musk run wild by inappropriately accessing and rifling through sensitive SSA and Treasury files, with IRS being next—your data! How does that make sense?

    “But while President Trump is busy making problems worse, and trampling our laws, and quoting dictators—what are we doing here in the Senate?

    “Are we holding President Trump accountable? Are we holding his co-President, Elon Musk—the richest man in the world, who has billions of dollars in conflicts of interest—accountable? 

    “Are we putting a stop to the catastrophic cuts and reckless firings that are hurting people and our communities, and setting our country back decades?

    “Seems to me that would be a good use of our time—after all, I’ve even heard some Republicans admit that cutting things like medical research, and firing people like VA workers are bad ideas. So you would think—maybe—we could work together from that common ground.

    “But instead—Republicans are throwing all their effort behind a partisan plan to slash and burn programs that help our families, and raise costs for everyday Americans, and shovel billions of dollars to help people who already have billions of dollars.

    “Meanwhile, I would like to remind my colleagues we are less than a month away from a deadline to pass bills to fund our government. And as we approach that deadline, the entire world is watching as President Trump and Elon Musk shut the government down bit-by-bit—whatever parts Elon doesn’t like.

    [TRUMP AND MUSK’S RECKLESS, HEARTLESS MASS FIRINGS]

    “Trump and Musk are already showing thousands of essential workers the door—despite the fact that they have no clue what these workers do, or why their jobs matter. They’re just turning off the lights and hoping for the best! 

    “I am hearing so much alarm about this back home—from fired workers and from the people who depend on them.

    “Trump and his co-president are shuttering entire agencies, they are locking workers out of their devices and out of their buildings, and demanding the work of the American people come to a screeching halt—again, for no good reason.

    “And let me really drive home just how damaging and extreme these firings are—because we are not talking about some routine changing of the guard or some thoughtful or strategic plan to make government more efficient.

    “Trump and Musk are just taking a wrecking ball through the U.S. government. They don’t care what they smash up. They don’t care who they hurt. And they don’t seem to have any idea just how painful this is for American families.

    “We are talking about tens of thousands of people—and counting—being pushed out the door without any plan, and without any justification beyond Trump and Elon want to slash and cut with reckless abandon.

    “This has nothing to do with making government more efficient—it is about breaking it beyond repair.

    “Fundamentally, this is not about cutting waste or curbing fraud. Instead, this is about putting the federal workforce into ‘trauma’—that’s how OMB Director Russ Vought callously put it. 

    “So, they are mass firing hardworking women and men—many of them veterans—whose only mistake was serving our country, serving our communities, and believing they wouldn’t get stabbed in the back by a wannabe dictator and the richest man in the world.

    “And, setting aside the fact that many were illegally fired and without real cause, it’s not just the workers who are suffering because of this.

    “These cuts undermine essential services for the American people—right down to some of the most basic functions of government.

    “Trump and Musk are firing people who help Americans find quality, affordable health insurance, people who help small businesses get a loan, people who help communities and families get back on their feet after a disaster, and people who help Americans get their tax refunds.

    “They are firing people who help our economy stay competitive—from firings that undermine energy projects and thousands of good, new jobs, to firings that undermine innovation and technology, to firings that are hurting our farmers and undermining agricultural research.

    “They are laying off National Park Rangers—which will mean longer wait times, dirtier bathrooms, delayed emergency responses, and closed parks.

    “They fired Forest Service workers who are crucial to preventing wildfires.

    “Again, I have to emphasize, they are firing FAA workers for crying out loud—including personnel who work on radar, landing, and other critical infrastructure that help our aircraft navigate safely.

    “They are firing these people, and pretending it is no big deal, all just weeks after the deadliest crash our nation has seen in decades.

    “Trump and Elon might not fly commercial—but the rest of us do.

    “In the Pacific Northwest, the Bonneville Power Administration is losing hundreds of highly skilled workers. This includes everyone from electricians and engineers, to dispatchers, to lineworkers, to cybersecurity experts, and so many others.

    “These are literally the people who help keep the lights on—and now they’re being fired on a whim because Trump and Elon Musk don’t have a clue about what they do and why it’s important, and you know what? They don’t care to learn.

    “They don’t even seem to understand that these are positions funded by ratepayers—by all of us who live in the Northwest—they are not from federal funding.

    “Trump and Musk have even fired over a thousand VA workers, including people who are doing lifesaving research for our veterans—research to prevent veteran suicide, build life changing prosthetics, address opioid addiction, and more.

    “These layoffs could mean longer wait times for veterans to see their health care providers. It could mean ongoing clinical trials coming to a sudden stop. It could mean delays getting your disability claims approved.

    “Because Trump and Musk went ahead and fired clinicians and claims raters—even while the current back log of disability claims is over 250,000!

    “That is not just a betrayal of these public workers—it is a betrayal of our women and men who have served us in uniform.

    “And it is also worth noting—many of the workers being fired are veterans themselves. Trump is firing veterans.

    “And let’s not forget the thousands of NIH researchers who are having their research thrown into jeopardy, and the patients who are watching President Trump carelessly toss their best hope for a cure into the shredder.

    “Or CMS experts, who were working on improving maternal health outcomes so fewer pregnant women die in this country.

    “And medical research layoffs aren’t the only ones putting American lives at risk because Trump and Musk are firing public health workers who respond to disease outbreaks, cybersecurity experts who protect our critical infrastructure, sensitive systems, and our data, scientists who make sure our water and air are clean, and that we are ready for extreme weather, workers that help communities prepare for, respond to, and recover from disasters—not to mention, members of law enforcement who help stop violent criminals—and of course, our nuclear engineers!

    “Seriously—people who manage our nuclear weapons stockpile were being fired by the hundreds, with no real strategy. 

    “And we know there isn’t a strategy—because then Trump and Musk frantically turned around and rehired many of them.

    “And we also know they haven’t learned their lesson—because they just did the exact same thing to workers responding to bird flu.

    “Reckless layoffs—followed by ‘Wait, no! Come back!’ That is not a plan.

    “To callously fire people who help us stay ahead of deadly diseases, or who maintain a safe, secure, and reliable nuclear weapons stockpile—that is the height of dangerous incompetence.

    “And nuclear clean-up work has been hit as well. I’ve been fighting to get more resources for the Hanford clean-up in Washington state for years—it is already understaffed, and now Trump is actively making things worse.

    “I have heard directly from workers at Hanford who have been laid off—even after some were recognized just this past year for their outstanding work. And by the way: that underscores another reality of these firings—they have absolutely nothing to do with merit.

    “In fact, the way they are targeting new employees includes people who were recently promoted—so now these workers are getting fired from their newly earned jobs. Literally pushing out some of our best performers and our most committed workers.

    “Oh, and one more thing—they are even illegally firing the government watchdogs who provide accountability and prevent fraud.

    “If Trump and Musk were really committed to tackling waste, fraud, and abuse, would they fire the very people serving in nonpartisan roles whose very job is to uncover and reduce waste, fraud, and abuse?

    “If they were really interested in transparency, would they have torn down websites where the public can find information about agencies’ spending and policy?

    “The list of pointless, actively dangerous firings goes on, and on, and on. It grows by the day—as does the fallout and alarm being caused by it. My phones have been ringing off the hook—and I know I am not the only one.

    “Again, these sweeping layoffs do not address fraud or waste. These firings are totally arbitrary—pushing out high performers and the promising next generation of our federal workforce who won’t be easily replaced. Not to mention—the hiring freeze prevents them from even trying!

    “And here’s the thing that is so important to remember: these are people who have families, who work hard, who love their country. They are not being sent packing because they’ve done anything wrong or because their work is not important.

    “They are being pushed out simply because Trump and Musk are trying to break the government—trying to make it not work for the people who need it. It is wrong, and if this doesn’t stop now, it will be catastrophic.

    “The scale and scope of Trump and Elon’s purge will set our country back decades. It is not like you can fire everyone, say ‘oh wait, my bad,’ and rehire everyone with the snap of a finger.

    “If you are a VA medical researcher working for less than you could make in the private sector, and you’re fired by a billionaire who decides your research on cancer and burn pit exposure isn’t worth the investment, would you want to come back? Especially with the chaos and sheer incompetence of this administration?

    “The federal government is not Twitter. You can’t just fire everyone and break things and hope for the best—people’s lives are at stake.

    “Elon Musk has no clue what nuclear safety engineers do at Hanford. He doesn’t care that the Social Security Administration is already understaffed, and that pushing more of those federal workers out the door will make life harder for seniors.

    “This effort to push out and arbitrarily fire federal workers is going to break something, worse than it already has—and it’s going to break it irreparably.

    “When that happens, the blame will fall squarely on Trump, Musk, and Republicans.

    [TRUMP AND MUSK’S ILLEGAL FUNDING FREEZE]

    “And it is not just people being fired that is a serious problem—there are also funds still being frozen without rhyme, or reason, or any legal authority for Trump to do that.

    “So I’m not only worried about the fast-approaching funding deadline in March—I’m worried about the de facto government shutdown happening right now.

    “As we speak, Trump and Musk are still illegally blocking hundreds of billions of dollars in funding we all secured for the people we represent back home, putting good-paying jobs on the chopping block, creating incredible uncertainty for businesses, stalling funds for infrastructure and energy projects, and so much else.

    “As another week of Trump’s illegal funding blockade has come and gone, still, reports are coming in from across my state, and across the country—of the chaos and cuts this is causing.

    “And yet, little to nothing has been done by this administration to restore investments people in red and blue states are counting on. And Republicans here in Congress continue to sit by idly while our communities are robbed of hundreds of billions of dollars in bipartisan spending.

    “Meanwhile, it’s our workers, it’s our families, it’s our businesses that are feeling this consequence.

    “With each day that passes, the uncertain fate of these investments takes a toll of its own: ever-growing anxiety for workers whose jobs are in jeopardy, for farmers who are eyeing the calendar and waiting on resources that they are owed, and for business owners worried a ripped-up contract might put them under.

    “I’ve heard USDA grants have been cut off to rural businesses and farmers in my home state of Washington—and it is putting those hard-working Americans in dire straits.

    “A small laundromat ordered new machines—but Trump is now stiffing them on funds they need to make the payment.

    “A wheat farmer installed solar panels under a federal program—but Trump is going to leave them holding the bag.

    “A greenhouse has completed its end of the bargain to install upgrades—but Trump has stopped the federal government from doing the part it promises.

    “And there are so many other federal investments on hold as well: Forest Service funding to reduce wildfire risks and restore ecosystems. EPA funding for clean water infrastructure and clean-up work at superfund sites. HUD and Department of Energy investments to bring down folks’ energy costs and create new, good-paying jobs. Funding for our roads, bridges, transit, flood mapping, fisheries—and so many other things.

    “Medical research has also been completely upended at research institutions across the country—throwing lifesaving research, clinical trials, and patients into uncertainty.

    “Meanwhile they have not only illegally blocked our foreign assistance and shuttered USAID programs that bolster our global leadership and make the world safer for Americans—they are now illegally dismantling the Department of Education.

    “They have already bulldozed the independent research arm of the Department of Education—taking a wrecking ball to ongoing evidence-based research and basic collection data we need for accountability to improve student outcomes at our K-12 schools and colleges.

    “And, among the many contracts Trump cancelled with his executive orders was funding for a program that helps students with disabilities transition from high school to work and work to improve adoption of evidence-based literacy practices in Washington state. These billionaires have no idea what programs they are cutting.

    “Given the chaos of all these efforts—from Trump’s sweeping, radical, and illegal Executive Orders, to Elon Musk jumping from agency to agency and doing seemingly whatever he pleases and whatever is good for his businesses—it’s getting hard to even keep track of all the funding that is being illegally blocked.

    “Even stuff they say is not blocked, or say has been unblocked—is still frequently frozen.

    “But one thing that is clear? This is hurting our families. It is hurting our communities. And it needs to stop.

    “Remember, Musk is the richest man on earth—with deep business ties to China and a direct line to Putin.

    “Republicans have chosen to stand by and twiddle their thumbs, as he unilaterally, clandestinely, and illegally cuts our constituents off from the federal investments they are owed and badly need.

    “We have zero insight or oversight of what conflicts of interest Musk has as he chokes off government funding left and right, and as he hands over our sensitive financial data and systems to patently unqualified individuals with no accountability.

    “This multi-billionaire is operating completely in the dark, hoping his lies are loud enough to drown out any calls for truth or for transparency.


    “You can agree or disagree about federal spending—goodness knows we have debates on it here—but it is a complete lie to try and say this is all fraud, or waste, or a conspiracy.

    “As a long-time Appropriator—I can tell you—we debate these bills publicly, we post the details out in the open. We pass them in a bipartisan way.

    “Republicans overwhelmingly supported the individual bills we put together in Committee last year—many unanimously.


    “Spending is not a ‘conspiracy’ just because Elon Musk doesn’t know how to read USA-Spending.gov.

    “A program is not waste just because it doesn’t help the richest man in the world. It is not fraud just because he doesn’t like it.

    “A law is not illegal just because he disagrees with it. This guy just does not know what he is talking about—and it is frankly embarrassing, he doesn’t know how to count!

    [MUSK, DOGE LIES AND CORRUPTION]

    “The ‘DOGE’ website says it is slashing $55 billion—but it only lists $16.6 billion, and half of that is a typo.

    “They took $8 million with an M—as in ‘Musk can’t count’—and counted it as $8 billion with a B—as in ‘BS.’ That is not saving money—it is poor reading comprehension.

    “Speaking of reading comprehension—I don’t think Elon fully grasps what the concepts of ‘transparency’ and ‘accountability’ mean.

    “When he tweeted out the names of government employees months ago—and again this month even—that was ‘accountability,’ but when reporters name people gaining illegal access to Treasury’s payment system, that is a crime?

    “Elon Musk gets to look at all of our most sensitive data but no one gets to look at what he is actually doing? That cannot be the standard.

    “It’s not ‘maximally transparent’ for Elon Musk to decide for himself what he shares publicly about his actions.

    “It is maximally concerning—especially given there are many obvious conflicts of interest—but Elon has not recused himself from a single decision.

    “How is it not a conflict—when the owner of Space X is gutting NASA while taxpayer funds to his company keep flowing?

    “How is it not blatant corruption—when the owner of Tesla is freezing grants and loans that benefit his competitors?

    “How are we supposed to just trust him, when he is probing agencies that have done—or are doing right now—investigations into his businesses?

    “Trump fired the Ag Inspector General who was investigating Elon’s company, Neuralink—and then fired the FDA officials who were reviewing it.


    “He fired the EPA Inspector General and Transportation Inspector General as they were looking at Tesla.


    “He fired the Labor Inspector General—as the Department has several investigations into Musk’s companies.

    “And Trump fired the Defense Inspector General who was looking at Space X—and notably, Musk’s connections to Putin.

    “And it’s not just Musk who is concerning—he’s brought on an army of walking red flags to pry into our government’s most sensitive data.

    “How are Americans supposed to feel, knowing someone who was previously fired for leaking sensitive information from their employer is digging through your most private financial data?

    “How are Americans supposed to feel, knowing someone who engaged with prominent white supremacists and misogynists online is helping to shutdown USAID?

    “How are they supposed to feel, knowing someone who tweeted explicitly racist statements, someone who said they were, quote, ‘racist before it was cool,’ was given control over incredibly important Treasury payment systems?

    “What sort of vetting—if any—is going on here? Are they trying to pick the least qualified, most concerning people? Hey Elon—you are supposed to filter out red flags—not select for them!

    “The American people deserve transparency—if Elon Musk really has nothing to hide, then he should leave his safe place on X and at Trump rallies and come before us at a Congressional hearing to be held accountable to the public.

    [TRUMP HURTING PEOPLE IN RED AND BLUE STATES]

    “What they are doing here is not just illegal—it is devastating for working people in every single zip code in America, red and blue states alike.

    “Right now, we need to be speaking out with a unified voice to ensure that when Congress passes a bill, the law is followed.

    [DANGERS OF A FULL-YEAR CR]

    “And we need to focus on negotiating serious funding bills on a bipartisan basis ahead of the fast-approaching March 14th deadline. That is exactly what I am trying to do right now. And, a long term CR should not be acceptable for anyone here.

    “As I have reminded my colleagues many times now: there is a world of difference between a short term CR that gives us additional time for good faith negotiations on our full-year funding bills, and a long term CR that would not only create major shortfalls for critical programs, but would also hand vast power over spending decisions to an administration that absolutely cannot and should not be trusted.

    “Passing a clean full year CR would, first of all, create major shortfalls and fail to adjust for new realities on the ground.

    “It could mean that instead of babies getting fed through WIC, moms are getting put on a waitlist for the first time in that program’s history. And instead of families getting rental assistance, they get cut off.

    “A clean full year CR means veterans are not able to get the care they need and benefits they have earned in a timely way.

    “And it means our military falling behind—from forcing cuts across DoD, to pausing promotions, station changes, and other really essential functions.

    “It also means losing opportunities to provide new resources for new challenges, and to provide a check on Trump policies—including ones it is clear members on both sides have issues with.

    “And on that note, I want to emphasize this—because this is really critical—unlike a short-term CR, a clean, full-year CR means hundreds of specific funding directives from Congress fall away, effectively creating slush funds for this administration to adjust spending priorities and potentially eliminate longstanding programs as they see fit. That is a nonstarter.


    “With a full-year CR, Congress would be turning over our power of the purse to a President who has already shown he couldn’t care less about the separation of powers.

    “A yearlong CR could be a green light for President Trump, Elon Musk, and Russell Vought to redirect funding to their own pet projects—and slash, burn, and zero out programs we have supported from Congress, that our families count on.

    “Maybe they siphon money away from public schools. Maybe they slash federal work study grants and other financial aid. Maybe they zero out money for national parks or monuments they think are too ‘Woke…’ or what would that even mean!

    “Maybe they scrap all our oversight of immigration courts, or end family reunification efforts, or dismantle the guardrails for detaining immigrants—something we are already seeing, by the way, with the use of Guantanamo Bay.

    “They could cut funding to eliminate HIV, address maternal mortality, or increase vaccination rates.

    “They could turn our constituents’ priorities into slush funds. Clean energy investments could become a payday for fossil fuels. Money meant to stop fentanyl and opioids could fuel private prison operations and mass deportations.

    [THE COMMON SENSE, BIPARTISAN PATH FORWARD]

    “Congress must detail its spending priorities—and direct President Trump to implement these programs faithfully by passing appropriations bills just as it does every year.

    “There is truly no telling just how far they will go in bending our federal budget from what our constituents need into whatever Trump and Musk want.

    “If you don’t think things could get worse—you’re wrong. A clean, yearlong CR is frankly an unacceptable outcome.


    “We cannot tell our constituents, that instead of using our authority to check a President, we give him the keys to the kingdom.

    “We cannot say, instead of fighting to get you the resources you need, we’ll let a billionaire have more say in where your tax dollars go instead.

    “So we need Republicans to get serious about bipartisan funding bills. And we have got to know that once those bills become law, Trump will actually follow them.

    “We cannot just reach an agreement, pass a bill, and then stand by while President Trump rips our laws in half.

    “There is a serious, bipartisan path forward for our country—but it is one where Congress works together to avoid a shutdown, stops the de facto shutdown that is already happening, and reasserts its authority to protect the funding our communities need.

    [REPUBLICANS’ PRO-BILLIONAIRE BUDGET RESOLUTION]

    “But unfortunately, that’s a far cry from the path Republicans are going down with this pro-billionaire, anti-middle-class budget resolution.

    “Let’s be very clear: Republicans’ budget resolution doesn’t just accept, it actually doubles down on what Trump and Musk are doing.

    “And it is not about balancing the budget—we all know that, because they don’t plan to reverse one of the biggest drivers of the debt: Republican tax cuts.

    “Despite all of the boogeymen that Republicans like to point to as driving the national debt—the reality is that the single biggest driver of our national debt since 2001 has been Republican tax cuts.

    “The Trump and Bush tax cuts have cost our nation over $10 trillion dollars and counting. And you’ll never guess what our colleagues on the other side of the aisle are focused on right now—nothing to lower the cost of eggs—it’s actually more Republican tax cuts!

    “And, no, they will not be paid-for. And, yes, they will blow up the national debt.

    “While Elon Musk hacks and chops his way through the government in the name of meager ‘savings’ and Republicans are cheering him on, they are all hoping we will ignore the elephant they brought into the room.

    “Even as this budget is a roadmap for painful cuts to programs families count on each and every day—all so they can give billionaires more tax cuts.

    “Republicans are going down this partisan path because they know Democrats are not going to join them in throwing Medicaid, nutrition assistance, and veterans’ benefits into the wood chipper, so they can throw more tax cuts at billionaires and the biggest corporations.

    “Make no mistake—this budget resolution is the DOGE resolution, as it assumes the staggering amount of $1 trillion in unspecified cuts in 2025 alone and $9 trillion over 10 years.

    “Where do we think those sort of dramatic cuts are going to come from? It’s going to come out of SNAP benefits that keep our kids from going hungry. It is going to come out of public schools and community health centers. It is going to come out of life-saving medical research.

    “It will mean costs going up for everyday Americans. 

    “It means child care costs going up when families lose access to Head Start and other quality, affordable options.

    “It means heating and cooling costs going up when families get cut off from LIHEAP.

    “It means rent going up as assistance programs get slashed.

    “It means your health care costs go up as community health centers and family planning providers are forced to close their doors.

    “It means grocery costs going up as programs like SNAP and WIC are gutted—not to mention what happens when you cut support for farmers, and for ag-research.

    “And make no mistake, if you are cutting that deeply, that painfully, you are going to start cutting things like veterans’ disability and education benefits, you are going to start cutting Medicare and Medicaid—which, for the information of all Senators, 30 million children rely on.

    “There is just no other way to make their numbers work. Especially when we know that this is just step one in their plan—and step two: tax breaks for billionaires and massive corporations.

    “So, first they are handing Elon Musk a chainsaw to cut programs families rely on with no accountability—then they are rewarding him with enormous tax breaks. And that is completely unacceptable.

    “We should not be taking kids out of child care to give billionaires a tax break.


    “We should not be taking food off the family table to put more fuel into private jets.

    “I grew up in a family that knew what it was like to fall on hard times. My dad— who was a veteran—got too sick to work. He had multiple sclerosis.

    “My mom, kept us afloat with Dad’s VA benefits, food stamps, and the new job she got thanks to a federal workforce program.

    “It wasn’t easy. Mom always said they crawled—crawled—to Social Security and Medicare. But she worked hard, and our government was there for them when those hard times came.

    “I know there are families struggling now, just like my family struggled then. I hear from them every day—in the letters we get here in Washington D.C., and in the conversations I have back home in Washington state.

    “They work hard. They play by the rules. They deserve—at the very least—the same opportunity my parents had when I was growing up.

    “And I am not going to stand by silently while Republicans try to sell that opportunity away, to pay for even more tax breaks for billionaires.

    “I get why that sounds like a good idea to billionaires like Donald Trump. I get why it’s a sweet deal for Elon Musk—the richest man in the world. It’s great for them—because they are not the ones footing the bill!

    “The bill for these tax breaks, the cost of these cuts, is going to be paid by folks like my mom and dad.

    “Everyday Americans will pay for billionaire tax breaks with their health care. They will pay for billionaire tax breaks with abandoned medical research. They will pay for billionaire tax breaks with shuttered family farms and small businesses

    “Republicans can try and spin a fairy tale about how this will pay for itself, how this will work out for everyone and nobody cares about what will be affected—but the reality is going to show through pretty darn quick, and pretty darn painfully.

    “Because spin is not going to put food on the table. It will not pay the rent. It won’t fix the roads. It won’t lower prices. It won’t lower interest rates. And it won’t put money in families’ dwindling bank accounts.

    “When it comes to the job we were all sent here to do helping people, and solving problems—families need real solutions, not tax breaks for billionaires and talking points for everyone who loses out.

    “So, M. President, I would urge all of my colleagues: hit the breaks, and not just on this devastating, partisan budget resolution. Hit the brakes on what President Trump and Elon Musk are doing right now.

    “Let’s instead come together, and work on serious, bipartisan bills to fund the government. Let’s get investments that are sorely needed out to the folks we represent. Let’s pass legislation to give folks a hand—instead of this Republican plan that gives billionaires a handout.”

    MIL OSI USA News –

    February 21, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Republicans Block Murray Amendment to Actually Address Domestic Priorities and Help Families Get Ahead Through a Bipartisan Process

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Washington State Patty Murray

    ICYMI: Senator Murray on Senate Republicans’ Pro-Billionaire Budget Resolution, Trump and Musk’s Devastating Funding Freeze and Mass Firings

    ICYMI: Senator Murray speaks at Budget Committee markup of resolution, offers common sense amendments rejected by Republicans

    Washington, D.C. — Tonight on the Senate floor, U.S. Senator Patty Murray (D-WA), Vice Chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee and a senior member and former Chair of the Senate Budget Committee, put forward an amendment to Senate Republicans’ pro-billionaire budget resolution to address defense and nondefense funding needs equally—tackling national security concerns and pressing domestic challenges like supporting biomedical research, child care, the housing crisis, and much more.

    Rather than the $342 billion Republicans are proposing in mandatory funding through the partisan reconciliation process, Murray’s amendment would have provided $171 billion in discretionary funding for defense and $171 in discretionary funding for domestic needs. Unlike the partisan approach taken by Republicans, the funding under the Murray amendment would be available to address a range of critical needs and help hardworking families get ahead. Senator Murray has long emphatically argued that Congress must not leave funding for families and domestic priorities behind.

    Republicans blocked Murray’s amendment, #878, in a XX-XX vote.

    Senator Murray said on the Senate floor when offering her amendment, #878:

    “My amendment does two things: First, it strikes the reconciliation instructions. Secondly, it creates a reserve fund to implement a bipartisan, multi-year agreement to provide $171 billion in discretionary funding for both defense and nondefense.

    “Democrats do agree: we need more resources to invest in our national security, address challenges at the border, and counter China—but we cannot leave the rest of our budget in the dust while we do that.

    “So let’s deliver investments to do both—and make sure we also support our veterans, agriculture, disaster response, biomedical research, the FAA, child care, and more.

    “These are all big challenges; Democrats stand ready to work with our colleagues—as we have in the past, including through our bipartisan efforts on the Appropriations Committee.

    “But that can only happen if Republicans are willing to work with us. And working with us means actually working with us—not telling us to accept Elon Musk cutting a trillion dollars in fiscal year 2025 to our priorities, which is assumed in this Republican budget plan. And at the same time, spending $342 billion on their own priorities.

    “It also means not sitting on your hands while Elon and Trump rip up our bipartisan laws. I urge my colleagues to support this amendment.”

    Earlier today, Murray delivered a lengthy speech on the Senate floor where she laid out in detail how Republicans’ budget resolution is a blueprint for deep, painful cuts to programs like Medicaid and SNAP that help working families—all in service of passing more tax giveaways for billionaires. Murray also underscored how the Trump administration’s lawless mass firings and funding freeze is hurting people and jeopardizing critical services in every part of the country, and why a clean full-year CR is not an acceptable solution to government funding.

    Last week at the Senate Budget Committee mark up of Senate Republicans’ Budget resolution, Senator Murray, a senior member and former chair of the committee, put forward six amendments to steer Republicans toward a bipartisan approach to spending, affirm Congress’ power of the purse, reverse cuts to NIH, deliver transparency into the so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), and more. Republicans unanimously opposed every amendment Murray and other Democrats offered. In her opening remarks, Murray also called for Elon Musk to come before the Committee to discuss his already in-motion efforts to decimate programs people count on.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    February 21, 2025
  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: CMA reaches settlement with banks in competition case

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Banks agree to pay fines for past exchanges of sensitive information about UK government bonds.

    • CMA and 4 banks agree to settle separate cases related to UK government bonds, known as gilts
    • Citi, HSBC, Morgan Stanley and Royal Bank of Canada will pay fines totalling over £100 million – Deutsche Bank has immunity for reporting its conduct which began in 2009 and ended in 2013
    • Individual traders at each of the banks took part in private one-to-one Bloomberg chatrooms in which they shared sensitive information relating to buying and selling gilts on specific dates

    Gilts are an important type of UK government bond that help to finance public spending. Investors in gilts lend money to the UK government and in return receive a steady and stable stream of cash interest payments.

    Healthy competition drives investment, innovation and growth, and it is important that competitors decide their price and strategies independently in order to ensure effective competition in a market. 

    Following an investigation by the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA), the banks have agreed to pay fines for specific instances in which traders shared competitively sensitive information about aspects of the pricing of UK bonds. The sharing of information occurred in one-to-one exchanges between traders about the buying and selling of gilts and gilt asset swaps.

    This conduct took place on various dates between 2009-2013, with the last exchanges occurring in 2010 for HSBC, 2012 for Morgan Stanley, and 2013 for each of Citi, Deutsche Bank and Royal Bank of Canada. Since then, the banks have implemented extensive compliance measures to ensure this behaviour does not happen again.

    Juliette Enser, Executive Director of Competition Enforcement at the CMA, said:

    Following constructive engagement between the banks and the CMA, we are pleased that we have been able to settle these 5 cases involving the past sharing of competitively sensitive information about pricing.

    The financial services sector is an integral part of the UK economy, contributing billions every year, and it’s essential that it functions effectively. Only through healthy and competitive markets can we ensure businesses and investors have confidence to invest and grow – for the benefit of all in the UK.

    The fines imposed today reflect the CMA’s commitment to dealing with competition law breaches and deterring anti-competitive conduct. The fines would have been substantially higher had the banks not already taken unusually extensive steps to make sure that this doesn’t happen again.

    Unlawful exchanges in one-to-one chatrooms

    Each of the exchanges took place in separate bilateral online Bloomberg chatrooms between individual traders at 2 banks [see Figure 1] and included information relevant to the pricing of UK government bonds – specifically, gilts and gilt asset swaps.

    In particular, each one-to-one exchange of information took place in relation to one or more of the following: firstly, the sale of gilts by the UK Debt Management Office via auctions on behalf of HM Treasury, secondly the subsequent buying and selling, i.e. trading, of gilts and gilt asset swaps, and thirdly the selling of gilts to the Bank of England – known as ‘buy back’. Not all banks were involved in unlawful exchanges in all 3 contexts.

    Figure 1 – Parties to the separate one-to-one exchanges

    Consequences

    Four banks – Citi, HSBC, Morgan Stanley and Royal Bank of Canada – have settled and agreed to pay fines totalling £104,460,000.

    Deutsche Bank is exempt from a financial penalty as it alerted the CMA to its participation in the chats via the authority’s leniency policy. Citi applied for leniency during the CMA’s investigation and as a result has received a reduced fine.

    In agreeing to settle with the CMA, the banks have agreed to pay these fines, bringing the investigation to a close.

    The fines for each bank are:

    • Citi: £17,160,000 – this includes a 35% leniency discount and a 20% reduction for settling in advance of the CMA issuing its Statement of Objections
    • HSBC: £23,400,000 – this includes a 10% reduction for settling after the CMA issued its Statement of Objections
    • Morgan Stanley: £29,700,000 – this includes a 10% reduction for settling after the CMA issued its Statement of Objections
    • Royal Bank of Canada: £34,200,000 – this includes a 10% reduction for settling after the CMA issued its Statement of Objections

    The fines take into account the length of time that has passed since the end of the infringements and the extensive compliance measures that the banks have implemented since then – some of which were in place before the start of the CMA’s investigation.

    The firms have until 22 April 2025 to pay their fines.

    More information on this investigation and the CMA’s update is available on the UK government bonds: suspected anti-competitive arrangements case page.

    Notes to editors

    1. A gilt is a UK government bond issued by HM Treasury through the UK Debt Management Office (‘DMO’). This case concerned conventional gilts only, i.e. gilts that pay a fixed rate of interest to the holder. Gilts are commonly issued through auction by the DMO in the UK to gilt-edged market makers (‘GEMMs’) and are actively traded in the financial market following issuance. All 5 banks investigated by the CMA are GEMMs.
    2. In 2009, in response to the financial crisis, the Bank of England adopted a quantitative easing (‘QE’) policy, which involved the Bank of England buying assets – the majority of which were gilts. The Bank of England therefore conducted regular buy-back auctions at certain points during the relevant period.
    3. The DMO, the Bank of England and HM Treasury were not under investigation. The DMO, on behalf of HM Treasury, and the Bank of England have assisted the CMA with the investigation by responding to information requests.
    4. The CMA has issued five separate bilateral infringement decisions. Decision documents are addressed to the following entities: Citigroup Global Markets Limited and its ultimate parent company Citigroup Inc. (together ‘Citi’), Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft (‘Deutsche Bank’), HSBC Bank Plc and its ultimate parent company HSBC Holdings Plc (together ‘HSBC’), Morgan Stanley & Co. International Plc and its ultimate parent company Morgan Stanley (together ‘Morgan Stanley’), and RBC Europe Limited and its ultimate parent company Royal Bank of Canada (together ‘Royal Bank of Canada’).
    5. In each decision, the CMA has found a single and repeated ‘by object’ infringement (i.e. that the conduct had, as its object, the restriction or distortion of competition within the UK). The CMA has not made any finding as to whether the conduct at issue had the effect of preventing, restricting or distorting competition.
    6. The information exchanges took place between: – Citi and Deutsche Bank: on 12 specific dates between July 2012 and January 2013 – Citi and Morgan Stanley: on 3 specific dates between December 2011 and February 2012 – Deutsche Bank and HSBC: on 12 specific dates between October 2009 and June 2010 – Deutsche Bank and Morgan Stanley: on 8 specific dates between October 2009 and June 2011 – Deutsche Bank and Royal Bank of Canada: on 41 specific dates between November 2009 and April 2013
    7. In the case of 4 of the banks (Citi, Deutsche Bank, HSBC and Morgan Stanley) the information was exchanged by a single trader based in the UK. In the case of the Royal Bank of Canada, the information was exchanged on different occasions by 2 traders based in the UK. None of the traders remain employed by the bank they worked for at the time.
    8. Bloomberg chatrooms are a means of electronic communication through which participants can exchange messages. Although the information exchanged through certain Bloomberg chatrooms formed part of the CMA’s investigation, Bloomberg was not under investigation.
    9. All banks were involved in unlawful exchanges relating to trading. In addition, Citi, Deutsche Bank, HSBC and Morgan Stanley were involved in unlawful exchanges relating to auctions; and Deutsche Bank, Citi and Morgan Stanley were involved in unlawful exchanges relating to buy-back auctions. Deutsche Bank and RBC also coordinated their strategies for trading gilts via brokers on a limited number of occasions.
    10. Under the CMA’s leniency policy, a business that has been involved in cartel activity may be granted immunity from penalties or a reduction in penalty in return for reporting the cartel activity and assisting the CMA with its investigation.
    11. A party under investigation by the CMA may enter into a settlement agreement if it is prepared to admit that it has breached competition law, is willing to pay a fine and agree to a streamlined administrative procedure for the remainder of the investigation. Settlement can take place before or after the CMA issues a Statement of Objections, which sets out the CMA’s provisional findings of fact and its legal and economic assessment of them.
    12. The CMA and the Financial Conduct Authority have concurrent functions to enforce competition law in the financial services sector. It was agreed that the CMA would exercise those functions in relation to this investigation.
    13. For media enquiries, contact the CMA press office on 020 3738 6460 or press@cma.gov.uk.

    Share this page

    The following links open in a new tab

    • Share on Facebook (opens in new tab)
    • Share on Twitter (opens in new tab)

    Updates to this page

    Published 21 February 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom –

    February 21, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Russia: Dmitry Chernyshenko held the first meeting of the Government Commission for the implementation of the comprehensive state program of the Russian Federation “Development of physical culture and sports”

    Translartion. Region: Russians Fedetion –

    Source: Government of the Russian Federation – An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.

    Dmitry Chernyshenko held the first meeting of the Government Commission for the implementation of the comprehensive state program “Development of physical culture and sports”

    February 20, 2025

    Dmitry Chernyshenko held the first meeting of the Government Commission for the implementation of the comprehensive state program “Development of physical culture and sports”

    February 20, 2025

    Dmitry Chernyshenko held the first meeting of the Government Commission for the implementation of the comprehensive state program “Development of physical culture and sports”

    February 20, 2025

    Dmitry Chernyshenko held the first meeting of the Government Commission for the implementation of the comprehensive state program “Development of physical culture and sports”

    February 20, 2025

    Previous news Next news

    Dmitry Chernyshenko held the first meeting of the Government Commission for the implementation of the comprehensive state program “Development of physical culture and sports”

    Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Chernyshenko held the first meeting of the Government Commission for the implementation of the comprehensive state program of the Russian Federation “Development of physical culture and sports”.

    Dmitry Chernyshenko recalled that in 2024, at a meeting of the Sports Council, the President instructed to increase the level of coordination of the management of physical education and sports, affecting various areas and spheres of the economy. This Government Commission was established by a Government Resolution.

    “President Vladimir Putin has set us the task of developing a unified approach to the development of physical education and sports under the state program. The total expenditure of budgets at all levels on sports in the country alone is more than 700 billion rubles, and there are also corporate expenses. The commission is called upon to unite all available resources and increase the efficiency of financial investments. Within the framework of the state program, large-scale construction of sports facilities is planned for 2030: flat sports grounds, modular complexes and capital sports facilities, and much more,” Dmitry Chernyshenko emphasized.

    The Deputy Prime Minister added that, on the instructions of the President, work is underway to increase the level of transparency of payments and create a system of incentives for coaches and athletes, which will be implemented, including through funds from the Russian Sports Fund.

    The draft law on the Russian Sports Fund has already been approved by the Government and submitted to the State Duma. The fund will also direct funds to the development of children’s and youth and mass sports, support for Olympians and Paralympians, and, if necessary, to the development of sports infrastructure. When selecting applications, the development of sports, the effectiveness of organizations, the volume of invested funds and attracted private investments will be taken into account.

    On the instructions of the head of state, the Government prepared directives for joint-stock companies with a Russian Federation share of more than 50% on the regular submission of information on extra-budgetary expenditures in the field of sports and the coordination of regions in the construction of sports infrastructure.

    Sports Minister Mikhail Degtyarev emphasized key changes in the approach to the development of the industry, and also outlined priorities for the coming years.

    “In accordance with the instructions of the President of the Russian Federation Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin, the program “Development of Physical Culture and Sports” received the status of a comprehensive one. An important criterion for efficiency is now not only the fulfillment of plans, but also the level of satisfaction of the population with the conditions created for sports. For us, this is now the main guideline,” the head of the department noted.

    The comprehensive state program until 2030 provides for large-scale construction of sports facilities throughout the country. The planned projects include 150 capital sports facilities, 637 smart sports grounds, 1078 small sports grounds and 86 quickly erected modular facilities: swimming pools, halls, skating rinks with artificial ice.

    In addition, the Ministry of Sports will continue to build modular sports facilities in historical regions that have returned to Russia. Five such facilities will be built there annually with a total funding of 1 billion rubles.

    The Minister stressed that taking into account existing sources of funding will be an important part of the work.

    “Information on consolidated regional expenditures, as well as on off-budget sources of development at the expense of state corporations, large businesses and sports federations will be systematized in the second quarter of this year. I would like to emphasize that this will not be additional financing for the industry, but a consideration of existing sources,” noted Mikhail Degtyarev.

    This approach will allow for more effective coordination between regions and the federal center, which will ensure the comprehensive development of sports infrastructure throughout the country.

    The President of the Russian Gymnastics Federation, CEO and Chairman of the Board of JSC Russian Railways Oleg Belozerov emphasized that JSC Russian Railways, being the largest company in Russia, is ready to actively integrate into the implementation of the sports development program.

    “More than 600 physical culture and sports clubs have been created and are developing in the Russian Railways system, including at its own sports facilities. This is the largest organization in terms of personnel in the Russian Federation. We hold more than 11 thousand events, covering more than 2.6 million employees, family members and veterans of the industry. All-Russian sports federations, as well as clubs and other components, receive financial support. And we can definitely say that good unified coordination within the framework of the mechanisms being created is extremely important. This will improve the quality of missionary activities,” said Oleg Belozerov.

    The head of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency, Veronika Skvortsova, noted that in order to improve the results of athletes, it is necessary to extend unified approaches to medical and biological support and analysis to regional teams, expand the digital health system for athletes, create a single database of permits based on an electronic passport, and modernize complex scientific groups, which will allow sports achievements to be brought to a new level.

    Dmitry Chernyshenko also instructed to create an expert council to support the commission and propose innovative solutions, and to continue collecting proposals to increase the level of citizen satisfaction with the conditions for physical education and sports, including through the public services portal.

    In addition, the Deputy Prime Minister noted the importance of providing information support for the development of sports and gave instructions regarding the coverage of the successes of Russian athletes.

    The work plan of the government commission for the implementation of the comprehensive state program “Development of Physical Culture and Sports” for 2025 and the composition of its presidium were also approved.

    The meeting was attended by the Minister of Sports Mikhail Degtyarev, the head of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency Veronika Skvortsova, the President of the Russian Gymnastics Federation, CEO and Chairman of the Board of JSC Russian Railways Oleg Belozerov, the Governor of the Tula Region, Chairman of the State Council Commission on Physical Culture and Sports Dmitry Milyaev, the CEO of the National Priorities ANO Sofia Malyavina, as well as representatives of relevant departments, organizations and subjects of the Russian Federation.

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    MIL OSI Russia News –

    February 21, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Australia: TV interview, ABC Afternoon Briefing with Patricia Karvelas

    Source: Australian Government – Minister of Foreign Affairs

    Patricia Karvelas, Host: Minister, welcome to the program.

    Penny Wong, Foreign Minister: Good to be with you, PK.

    Karvelas: Some breaking news, Minister, this afternoon – commercial pilots we are reporting, have been warned of a potential hazard in airspace between Australia and New Zealand, where three Chinese warships are conducting military exercises. Do you have any information to share regarding what is happening here?

    Foreign Minister: This is a Chinese task group that the Deputy Prime Minister has previously spoken about. We are aware of this task group. We are monitoring this task group very closely. It is, as I understand it, operating in international waters. We will be discussing this with the Chinese and we already have at officials’ level, in relation to the notice given and the transparency that is being provided in relation to these exercises, particularly the live fire exercises.

    Karvelas: Can you tell us why Airservices are telling commercial pilots not to fly over the area?

    Foreign Minister: Well, obviously this is an evolving situation, but it would be normal practice where a task group is engaging in exercises for there to be advice given to vessels and aircraft in the area, and Airservices is doing what it should do, which is to give that advice.

    Karvelas: And is there a fear of live fire and how that may affect these commercial flights? Is that, just for our viewers who perhaps don’t understand how these military exercises work, is that what would be exercising the minds of Airservices Australia?

    Foreign Minister: Well, obviously, as I said, this is an evolving situation, but I can talk to you about what the practice is. The practice is that countries, including Australia and others, can conduct military exercises in international waters. The advice to me is that this is what China is doing. When they do conduct those exercises, obviously notice is provided to ensure – that is available to anyone in the area, and that is what Airservices is doing. We do have concerns about the transparency associated with this and the notice, and I certainly will be having a discussion with Foreign Minister Wang about that.

    Karvelas: What will you raise with the Foreign Minister when you meet?

    Foreign Minister: There are many issues that I regularly raise in bilaterals with Foreign Minister Wang. You would anticipate I will cover those, and I will be very clear with him about some of the issues you and I have spoken about, PK.

    Karvelas: Will you press the Foreign Minister and Chinese officials to be more transparent about what this naval task force is doing and also where it is going?

    Foreign Minister: What I would say is that China is operating in international waters, just as Australia and other countries operate in international waters. We always express that all countries should comply with the UN Convention are the Law of the Sea – and that is what we will always be articulating to China and to all others who utilise the maritime commons.

    Karvelas: Some analysts have called this a deliberate show of force by China, which wants to demonstrate it can now easily project power into the Tasman, the South Pacific. Is that a fair assessment?

    Foreign Minister: I think that is a commentary piece that you probably should speak to a commentator about. As the Foreign Minister, what I need to articulate is Australia’s interest and Australia’s interests are in transparency and the observance of international law including the law of the sea. That is what we always articulate, for example, in relation to the South China Sea.

    Karvelas: New Zealand’s Defence Minister, Judith Collins, says the task force is a wake-up call for her country and should remind its citizens their geographical isolation no longer offers protection. Does that apply to Australia as well? Are you concerned that our geographic location also doesn’t protect us and that we need to actually be more aware of this threat?

    Foreign Minister: Well, they’re your words, not mine. What I would say is the government is very clear about the importance of Australia having the strategic and military capability to enable both deterrence and assurance. And you’ve seen, whether it’s through AUKUS or the work that Minister Marles has done, the importance the Government places on making sure the Australian Defence Force is appropriately equipped to enable deterrence. And why do we want deterrence? Because that is central to stability. You need both deterrence and assurance to enable and promote stability and peace in the region.

    Karvelas: Minister, in terms of Airservices and their diversion of commercial planes, how long should we expect this will go on for? Is that something you will seek clarity for, from the Chinese?

    Foreign Minister: Well, I don’t have any advice about that, but that is ultimately a matter for Airservices to determine, the notice they need to give to vessels and aircraft.

    Karvelas: I want to change the topic if I can, Minister, to another foreign issue that has been of course, huge, and there is an anniversary coming up, which makes it very pivotal, I think. President Trump has referred to Zelenskyy as a dictator. Does that language alarm you?

    Foreign Minister: Well, I don’t believe he is. What I’ve said very clearly for many years now, is Russia is the aggressor here. Russia is engaged in an illegal and immoral war against Ukraine, contravened the UN Charter as a permanent member of the Security Council, used its veto to protect itself so it could continue to conduct this war. 

    We stand very firmly in solidarity with the people of Ukraine. I had the opportunity to briefly meet President Zelenskyy when I was in Poland recently, and I made very clear to him that we, the people of Australia, the country of Australia, continues to stand with him and the people of Ukraine in their struggle for their sovereignty. 

    Karvelas: Minister, are you concerned that the US is refusing to co-sponsor a draft UN resolution that demands Russia withdraw its troops?

    Foreign Minister: Well, the US can make its decisions, and it can articulate the reasons for it, what I will say to you is what our position is, and I’ve outlined it.

    Karvelas: Yesterday I spoke to former Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull, and he told me we can’t assume we can rely on America anymore, that this is quite a dramatic shift in geopolitical positioning. Is that right? We can’t rely on America anymore?

    Foreign Minister: America has been Australia’s principal strategic partner and strategic ally for many decades, and that alliance has stood the test of time, and it has stood the test of political change. It’s an alliance which has been, and a relationship, which has been fostered by and carried by administrations and governments of both political persuasions. 

    It is the case that President Trump is charting a very different course – and he said he would, and we should expect that – but we should also have some confidence in our capacity to navigate that. I was very pleased to and honoured to be the first Australian Foreign Minister to be invited to a presidential inauguration. I was very pleased to have the opportunity so early on in the Trump Administration to engage with my counterpart, Secretary Marco Rubio, and also National Security Advisor Waltz. Deputy Prime Minister Marles has also been and engaged with his counterpart. So, this is a very deep relationship. It’s a relationship where there is a lot of engagement, and it’s a relationship which is important to both countries. 

    Karvelas: I understand that the Russian Foreign Minister is also attending the meeting of Foreign Ministers, where you are. Have you spoken to him and raised the issue in relation to Oscar Jenkins?

    Foreign Minister: As you know, Patricia, we have discontinued engagement, or halted engagement with Russian officials at senior levels since the invasion of Ukraine. I did, however, make an exception for that yesterday, because I wanted to express very clearly to Mr Lavrov the importance of Oscar Jenkins’ condition. I expressed to him the importance we associate with Mr Jenkins being treated appropriately, and Russia complying with its international legal obligations. 

    Karvelas: And what response did you get? I mean, are you getting any opening in terms of what we might be able to do to get Oscar Jenkins back?

    Foreign Minister: Well, obviously I’m not going to disclose more than is in Mr Jenkins’ interest, but I can say to you very clearly that Mr Lavrov understood that our view was that Mr Jenkins needed to be treated appropriately and Russia needed to comply with its international legal obligations.

    Karvelas: Did you shirtfront him?

    Foreign Minister: Well, I think that’s a Tony Abbott term. I spoke to him, as you would expect, I would speak to him on such a matter.

    Karvelas: OK, you used the Penny Wong method, I understand. 

    Just finally, Minister, I understand, before I let you go, on Israel, are you concerned over the behaviour exhibited by Hamas, parading the bodies of these dead hostages, and are worried about one of the bodies was incorrectly returned – it is obviously incredibly, a very difficult time, especially the implications for the ceasefire?

    Foreign Minister: First, I condemn unequivocally the way in which Hamas dealt with this. It was a sickening and cruel way to deal with the return of these two young children, the bodies of two young children. So, I would just express my condolences and sympathy to the families. 

    In relation to the ceasefire, we obviously continue, as so many countries do around the world, to urge all parties to comply with the ceasefire, including the return of hostages.

    Karvelas: Foreign Minister, thank you so much for joining us.

    Foreign Minister: Good to speak with you, Patricia.

    MIL OSI News –

    February 21, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Economics: Fixed communication services revenue in Malaysia to grow at 1.8% CAGR during 2024-2029, forecasts GlobalData

    Source: GlobalData

    Fixed communication services revenue in Malaysia to grow at 1.8% CAGR during 2024-2029, forecasts GlobalData

    Posted in Technology

    The fixed communication services revenue in Malaysia is expected to increase at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 1.8% from $1.9 billion in 2024 to $2.1 billion in 2029. This growth will be driven by the increasing demand for fixed broadband, particularly fiber-optic services, while fixed voice services are expected to decline due to the shift towards mobile and OTT communications. Telekom Malaysia is set to remain a leader in both segments, reveals GlobalData, a leading data and analytics company.

    GlobalData’s research reveals that the fixed voice service revenue will decline at a CAGR of 8.9% over 2024-2029 owing to consumer shift from traditional telephony to mobile/over-the-top (OTT) based communication services and the subsequent decline in voice service average revenue per user (ARPU) levels.

    Fixed broadband service revenue, on the other hand, will increase at a CAGR of 4.4% during 2024-2029, driven by the growing adoption of higher ARPU fibre-optic (FTTH/B) services.

    Pradeepthi Kantipudi, Telecom Analyst at GlobalData, says: “Fiber lines accounted for more than 97% share of the total fixed broadband lines in 2024 and will remain the leading broadband technology through 2029. This growth in fiber lines will be driven by the growing demand for high-speed broadband connectivity and efforts by the government and telecom operators to upgrade and expand fiber broadband infrastructure in the country.”

    Telekom Malaysia will lead both fixed voice and fixed broadband segments by subscriber share through 2029. The telco’s leading position in the fixed broadband segment is driven by its strong presence in the FTTH/B service segment and continued focus on fibre network expansions. For instance, Telekom Malaysia in partnership with government and under the 12th Malaysia Plan, aims to deploy 4,370 fiber-optic network hubs in the country by the end of 2025 with majority of them to be installed in rural areas to bring better and faster internet connectivity to homes. This project is expected to further boost digital connectivity and economic development for Malaysia.

    Kantipudi concludes: “As fixed voice services continue to decline, the expansion of fiber infrastructure will play a pivotal role in supporting economic growth and bridging the digital divide, particularly in underserved rural areas.”

    Information based on GlobalData’s Malaysia Fixed Communication Forecast (Q4 2024), which quantifies current and future demand and spending on fixed voice and data services. The data is published quarterly.

    MIL OSI Economics –

    February 21, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Economics: APAC motor insurance industry to surpass $301 billion by 2029, forecasts GlobalData

    Source: GlobalData

    APAC motor insurance industry to surpass $301 billion by 2029, forecasts GlobalData

    Posted in Insurance

    The motor insurance industry in the Asia-Pacific (APAC) region is projected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 5.6% from an estimated $229.2 billion in 2024 to $301.7 billion in 2029, in terms of written premiums, according to GlobalData, a leading data and analytics company.

    GlobalData’s Global Motor Insurance Market report reveals that China, Japan, Australia, South Korea, and India are the key markets in the APAC motor insurance industry, collectively accounting for 92% of the industry’s written premiums in the region in 2024. The industry is expected to grow by 5.6% in 2025 driven by increased sales of motor vehicles including electric vehicles (EVs), government subsidies and carbon dioxide reduction policies, regulatory changes, increasing motor insurance tariffs, and technological advancements.

    Swarup Kumar Sahoo, Senior Insurance Analyst at GlobalData, comments: “The APAC motor insurance market is witnessing a transformation, driven by the rise of EVs and regulatory changes. The region’s economic growth and demographic shifts are also playing a crucial role in shaping the market dynamics. For instance, the surge in vehicle sales post-COVID-19 has increased motor policy sales. Additionally, the increasing adoption of AI and digitalization in the insurance industry is enhancing service quality and operational efficiency, paving the way for future growth.”

    Insurers are developing new policies to cover EVs, which come with a new set of risks, as EV sales increased significantly in 2023-24 and further growth is anticipated in 2025 and beyond. Regulatory bodies in Taiwan, Singapore, and China are formulating specific insurance regulations for EV-related products, ensuring that the market adapts to the evolving landscape. This trend is expected to continue, with government subsidies and carbon reduction policies further boosting EV sales and, consequently, motor insurance demand.

    The strategic move by vehicle manufacturers to acquire insurance companies will also contribute to the growth. In May 2024, BYD, an electric carmaker, received regulatory approval for its new motor liability insurance offering after acquiring an insurance company in China. This trend highlights the increasing integration of vehicle manufacturers and insurance providers to offer enhanced experience for consumers and expand the market’s reach. The rise in new energy vehicles (NEVs) in China, accounting for a third of sales in 2023, underscores the potential for further growth in the motor insurance sector.

    Sahoo adds: “The adoption of AI and digitalization is also reshaping the motor insurance landscape in APAC. Insurers are leveraging vast amounts of data to develop risk curves and pricing models for NEVs, enhancing their ability to offer competitive and tailored products. However, the market remains tightly regulated, with constraints on premium increases posing challenges for insurers. Despite these hurdles, the focus on underwriting rigor and moderate rate increases is expected to sustain profitability and drive growth in the coming years.”

    Pay As You Drive (PAYD) motor policies are becoming increasingly popular in the APAC markets such as South Korea, Singapore, Malaysia, and India. As the major benefit of such policies is lower premium rates based on good driving behavior, distance traveled, and driving patterns, its wider adoption and popularity will offset premium hikes in the short term, impacting the industry’s performance.

    Sahoo concludes: “The increasing adoption of EVs, pay-as-you-go policies, regulatory advancements, and technological innovations are set to redefine the market landscape. As countries like Indonesia plan to mandate motor third-party liability insurance and Malaysia aims for a significant EV market share by 2030, the motor insurance market in APAC is poised for substantial growth. Insurers must continue to adapt to these changes, leveraging technology and strategic partnerships to capitalize on emerging opportunities and ensure sustained success.”

    MIL OSI Economics –

    February 21, 2025
  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: CoSTAR Realtime Lab at Water’s Edge in Dundee will provide a major stimulus to Scotland’s screen and tech industries

    Source: University of Abertay

    CoSTAR Realtime Lab at Water’s Edge in Dundee will provide a major stimulus to Scotland’s screen and tech industries

    A new £9m virtual production studio will drive research, innovation and economic growth in Scotland’s screen, games, immersive and performance industries.

    Abertay University launched the CoSTAR Realtime Lab at Water’s Edge, Dundee on Tuesday 18 February marking the start of operations for a major infrastructure project that will provide a significant boost to Scotland’s screen industries.

    This cutting-edge programme will bring new opportunities and expert support to UK creative and technology companies working across the breadth of the creative industries.

    The CoSTAR Network represents the largest investment in Creative Industries R&D to date with a £75.6M grant awarded by the UKRI Infrastructure Fund and delivered by the Arts and Humanities Research Council.

    The CoSTAR Realtime Lab is led by Abertay University and the total project investment is £9m operated in partnership with the University of Edinburgh, CodeBase, Interface and Chroma Developments.

    Industry and academia working in partnership

    Creative companies from across the UK and beyond will have the opportunity to work with the CoSTAR Realtime Lab, benefitting from state-of-the-art research and development (R&D) facilities and access to industry experts and academic researchers.

    The studio at Chroma Developments’ Water’s Edge in Dundee marks the beginning of the CoSTAR Realtime Lab’s work, with a further studio led by the University of Edinburgh to open at First Stage Studios in Edinburgh in March 2025. The facilities will be connected through the Realtime Cloud Lab supporting remote access and collaboration from anywhere in the world.

    Virtual production—a cinematography technique that employs computer-generated imagery (CGI), augmented reality, and motion capture to create immersive virtual film, game and performance sets – will be at the heart of the CoSTAR Realtime Lab’s work and represents a significant opportunity for creative companies working with real time technologies.

    Researchers will support industry-led projects to generate new products and processes to improve production pipelines including, 3D environments and video processing, performance and motion capture, facial animation, automated speech and dynamic generation of hyper-realistic digital film sets and many others. The CoSTAR Realtime Lab’s work will also look at ways to enhance spectator experiences at concerts, live events and museums and how immersive technologies like Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality can be better used and integrated.

    Blending Abertay University’s internationally renowned expertise in video games and technology with the University of Edinburgh’s world-leading AI, animation and film capabilities, the partnership will build transformative new processes, pipelines, tools and workflows to help companies grow, while de-risking opportunities to diversify and take on new projects and clients.

    Supporting creators and creative companies

    The CoSTAR Realtime Lab will create opportunities for Scotland’s screen innovators to access next generation production technologies and support them to apply their creativity, skills and expertise to create new technologies, design new experiences and establish new markets. Access will be offered through a series of open programmes, giving companies and creatives the opportunity to test, develop and refine their ideas.

    One of the main programmes is the Realtime TEST Lab, which offers creative companies, creatives and innovators access to resources to experiment with virtual production and creative technologies in content production or software development before committing further investment in their final productions. The Realtime TEST Lab is supported with funding from Screen Scotland.

    The CoSTAR Realtime Lab will also offer support through Collaborative R&D – a way of working in partnership that can be activated by companies, individuals and project staff in conversation with the CoSTAR Realtime Lab. Scale-up and start-up training and support will also be provided by CodeBase through its Techscaler programme.

    Further CoSTAR Network programmes include the Pilots and Prototypes Programme (PPP), a £3.6 million fund for UK companies to develop new ideas by accessing technical and research capabilities, and the Enterprise and Commercial programme (E&C) supporting the growth of highly capable, inclusive, and sustainable creative technology businesses.

    In addition to its main partners, CoSTAR Realtime Lab is supported by Screen Scotland, Scottish Enterprise, Amazon Web Services, Nvidia and VSS-Scotland.

    Professor Gregor White, Director of the CoSTAR Realtime Lab said:

    With the technologies that power our screen-based experiences in film, games and performance rapidly converging there’s an opportunity for companies working in these sectors to diversify their offer, explore new markets and push the boundaries of what was previously thought possible in their sectors. Bringing together international-quality academic researchers with industry experience and enterprise support, CoSTAR Realtime Lab is a truly collaborative project which will break down barriers for the Scottish creative industries, encourage entrepreneurship and experimentation, and provide a space where innovation can flourish.

    Professor Melissa Terras MBE, Edinburgh College of Art, Co-director of the CoSTAR Realtime Lab said:

    Scotland has vibrant creative industries, with world-leading activity in festivals, film/TV, music, heritage, and games in particular. Building a bridge between creatives and technologists will allow us to support the development of new products and services, while also ensuring that we are encouraging diverse access to cutting edge facilities, which will then produce diverse outputs. The partnership behind CoSTAR Realtime Lab is expertly placed to deliver this exciting innovation vehicle to support our creative communities.

    AHRC Executive Chair Professor Christopher Smith said:

    The CoSTAR Realtime Lab will build on the strong foundations of Scotland’s gaming cluster, bringing together next generation production technologies, the latest in video game development, and AI and machine learning, to support innovators in the creation of new technologies, experiences, and markets. As part of the CoSTAR network it will play a key role in ensuring that the UK’s creative industries act as a key driver of growth as identified in the government’s industrial strategy. It is by strategically investing in the industries of the future that AHRC shows how arts and humanities research drives innovation and growth in a 21st century economy.

    Chris van der Kuyl CBE, FRSE, Chairman, 4J Studios said: 

    I’ve always believed in Dundee’s potential as a global leader in technology and digital innovation. That’s why we’ve invested in spaces like Water’s Edge to provide a collaborative infrastructure for the next generation of creators and companies to thrive. The launch of the CoSTAR Realtime Lab is a major step in that journey, bringing cutting-edge virtual production technology to Dundee and securing its position at the forefront of real-time content creation. This is a huge opportunity for Scotland’s screen industries, and I’m incredibly proud to support it.

    UK Government Scottish Secretary Ian Murray said:

    This project is beyond exciting – the possibilities it creates for the entertainment industry are endless. The UK Government’s investment in cutting-edge initiatives like this is central to our Plan for Change to create the jobs and opportunities that will raise living standards right across the UK. “It’s a tremendous feather in the cap of Brand Scotland too, demonstrating to the world that Dundee and Scotland is a centre of excellence for the screen and gaming industries as we push into new markets and further strengthen the sector. I wish the team at Abertay University every success with the opening of the new facility.

    Stephen Coleman OBE, CEO & Co-Founder of CodeBase said:

    Supporting the CoSTAR Realtime Lab is another great opportunity for CodeBase to play our part as a Scottish ecosystem builder and a champion of tech-driven enterprise and entrepreneurship. We are always looking for new ways to collaborate with specialists in different technology domains and to leverage our delivery of Techscaler, Scotland’s national tech backbone for the benefit of the ecosystem as a whole, building on Scotland’s unique strengths in talent, research, and innovation.

    Howell Davies, Head of Strategic Funding and Programmes at Interface, said: 

    CoSTAR’s Realtime Lab is a game-changer for industry seeking to harness the power of real-time technologies. With access to cutting-edge tools, a deep and diverse pool of expertise and talent with a support system for organisations to empower them to innovate and create groundbreaking experiences, it will create significant impact and legacy for the UK’s creative industry and wider.

    Councillor Mark Flynn, Leader of Dundee City Council said:

    Dundee has a long history of being at the forefront of technology and innovation for the creative industries and it is wonderful to see the CoSTAR Realtime Lab and its virtual production studio being added to the city’s digital cluster. The video games, screen and performance industries already make a significant contribution to Dundee’s economic and cultural success and collaborative projects like this, supported by both academia and business, are important for the continued growth and future of the sector.

    Isabel Davis, Executive Director of Screen Scotland said: 

    An exemplar of academia collaborating directly with industry, Abertay’s role in CoStar and its leadership of the real-time lab continues Dundee’s illustrious history of creativity, design and invention.  The project will ensure that Scotland’s tech, digital and creative pioneers are embedded in the next wave of digital and creative transformation.

    For more information visit CoSTAR Network or follow @costarnetwork.

    Full information and funding calls can be found online: Access Programmes | CoSTAR

    MIL OSI United Kingdom –

    February 21, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: “Thoughtless and Dangerous” King says on Senate Floor in Response to Trump Administration Firings, Freezes

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Maine Angus King

    To watch the floor speech click here or download here

    A full transcript of the speech can be found here

    WASHINGTON, D.C.— U.S. Senator Angus King (I-ME) shared his growing concerns over the Trump Administration’s largely unconstitutional and unprecedented overreach – including the usurpation of Congressional Authority that has now reached the constitutionally-directed ‘power of the purse.’ During the floor speech, King also shared the detrimental impacts of reckless, indiscriminate government cuts on critical federal functions like management of the national parks and care for our veterans:

    “We’re not only making a mistake now, but we’re altering the essential structure of our Constitution that’s there for a reason, that’s there to protect our freedom. And the people cheering this on I fear, in a reasonably short period of time, are going to say where did this go? How did this happen? How did we make our president into a monarch? How did this happen? How it happened is we gave it up! James Madison thought we would fight for our power, but no. Right now, we’re just sitting back and watching it happen. Article 2 of the Constitution, the President said, oh, Article 2 gives me a lot of power,” King began. “No, it doesn’t. It makes the president Commander-in-Chief. That’s true. Here’s the key sentence in Article 2 of the Constitution, which defines the President’s power, the key sentence is not the power of the President. The responsibility of the President is to take care that the laws being faithfully executed. Not write the laws. Not deny the laws. Not ignore the laws. Not pick which laws he or she [likes. It is] to take care that the laws are faithfully executed. That’s the responsibility of the President. Right now, those laws are being ignored.”

    King then discussed the critical vulnerability of Congress relieving its duties to the courts – an abdication that would be hard to reverse no matter what administration is next elected into office.

    “There’s criticism in the press saying people are talking about a constitutional crisis, they’re crying wolf. This is a constitutional crisis. It’s the most serious assault on our Constitution in the history of this country. It’s the most serious assault on the very structure of our Constitution, which is designed to protect our freedoms and liberty, in the history of this country. It is a constitutional crisis, and I’ll tell you what makes it worse, the President and the Vice President are already hinting that they’re not going to obey decisions of the courts,” King continued. “Many of my friends in this body say it will be hard, we don’t want to buck the President, we’ll let the courts take care of it. Number one, that’s a cop out. It’s our responsibility to protect the Constitution. That’s what we swear to when we enter this body. To stand back and say we’re going to watch all this happen, and the courts will take care of it, that’s an abdication of our responsibility.”

    Lastly, he emphasized the profound importance of ‘protecting this institution’ that the Framers delicately created.

    King concluded, “So, Mr. President, this is a constitutional crisis, and we’ve got to respond to it. I’m just waiting for this whole body to stand up and say no, no, we don’t do it this way. We don’t do it this way. We do things constitutionally. Yes, it’s more cumbersome, it’s slower, that’s what the framers intended. They didn’t intend to have an efficient dictatorship, and that’s what we’re headed for. Mr. President, this is a very dangerous moment. We’ve got to wake up, protect this institution, but much more importantly protect the people of the United States of America. Thank you, Mr. President.”

    Senator King has been consistently sounding the alarm on President Donald Trump’s existential threat to the Constitution. He previously gave a speech on the Senate floor sharing that this administration is doing ‘exactly what the Framers [of the Constitution] most feared.” Senator King also previously declared that the proposal to halt all federal grant and loan disbursement was illegal and a direct assault on the Constitution. More recently, he joined 36 Senators in a letter to Secretary of State Marco Rubio, sharing the detrimental effects of  the Trump Administration’s dismantling of the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). He also joined fellow Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI) colleagues in writing a letter to the White House about the risks to national security by allowing unvetted Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) staff and representatives to access classified and sensitive government materials.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    February 21, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: King to Senate Colleagues: “We’ve Got to Wake Up [and] Protect this Institution”

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Maine Angus King
    To watch the floor speech click here
    WASHINGTON, D.C.— U.S. Senator Angus King (I-ME) today spoke on the Senate floor to share his growing concerns over the Trump Administration’s largely unconstitutional and unprecedented overreach – sharing the usurpation of Congressional Authority that has now reached the constitutionally-directed ‘power of the purse.’  In the speech, King also shared the detrimental impacts of reckless, indiscriminate government cuts on critical federal functions like management of the national parks and care for our veterans:
    The news is coming so hard and fast these days, that it’s hard to sort it all out. Every day seems to be something new that captures our attention, our concern, our interest. And what I’d like to do today is try to put some of it in perspective and what’s going on in our governing of this country. I don’t believe what I’m going to be talking about today is partisan. It should not be partisan because what I’m really talking about is competent government and constitutional government.  Really two categories — competent government and constitutional government. That should not be a controversial issue. Neither of those are something that we should be arguing about. It’s what we have a responsibility to carry through in terms of our jobs here in the U.S. Senate. So the two categories I want to talk about — my headings are thoughtless and dangerous. 
    First I want to talk about thoughtless. The hiring freeze. A hiring freeze can be an effective tool if it’s used thoughtfully and systematically. But to do it across the board without a process for exceptions that’s built into it, you end up with all kinds of unintended and negative consequences. Firefighters, parks, losses elsewhere by attrition. There should be a systematic exemption process. Now it’s haphazard and random. Park seasonal employees first were under the hiring freeze, now they’re not. It’s sort of like, oh, oh, or, we’re going to be okay without park seasonal employees. VA frontline health workers were at first subject to the hiring freeze then people said, oh, no, we didn’t mean doctors and nurses, so that’s okay. You can hire them. My point is it’s not a rational process. It’s ready, fire, aim. Literally, ready, fire, aim is what we’re talking about and people aren’t doing this in a thoughtful and systematic way. And, by the way, the difference between frontline deliverers of care at the V.A. and the people who answer the phone who are categorized as bureaucrats, I don’t think there’s a stark difference there. If you’re a veteran and are seeking care and an appointment at a V.A. health facility and nobody answers the phone, that’s a denial of benefits. That’s a denial of benefits, just as if they close the door in your face. That’s what we’re talking about, is weakening the systems that are serving our public. 
    The hiring freeze, it’s possible to do a hiring freeze. When I was governor of Maine, I instituted a hiring freeze, but we did it in a systematic and thoughtful way. We had a process for dealing with exemptions and without destroying the morale and throwing the entire operation of government into chaos. And, by the way, why do we have the government? To serve the people. To serve the people. 
    So let’s talk about the next step: the firings. The famous fork in the road letter is a perfect example of a thoughtless way to approach a problem. The letter went to everybody. The letter wasn’t selective. It went to everybody — all civilians in the CIA, in the National Security Agency, in the Defense Department. Also, of course, all the other civilian agencies. But it wasn’t targeted in a way. If you want to leave federal service, we’ll pay you through September, but it hit everybody. Again, it’s not a rational or thoughtful way to trim the federal workforce. You should be talking about where are we do we have too many people, do we have overstock in terms of public servants and where do we need more, for example. But instead it went to everybody. By definition, that’s not a rational process. Firing — let me just put this in perspective, by the way. On the fork in the road letter, the estimate is as of today 75,000 people have taken that option and left. And I suppose the people who are behind this think that’s a great victory. The dollars saved from those 75,000 people represent one tenth of one percent of the federal budget. So people out who are seeing, we’re cutting the budget, we’re cutting, we’re saving, we’re saving the taxpayers money. One tenth of one percent. Given the chaos and the uncertainty and the deletion of services to our American people, I would argue that’s not worth it. One tenth of one percent. Everyone got these letters. People are being fired now in the CIA, FBI, the V.A., and on this letter, what if only the best people take the option to leave? Then you’ve really shot yourself in the foot. You’ve encouraged people who were going to retire anyway or who could get a better job in the private sector. So it’s an anti-intelligent way to handle this. 
    And then you got situations like at the Department of Energy, the first weekend they fired 350 people in the National Nuclear Security Administration, the people who handle nuclear materials and are responsible for our nuclear stockpile. They fired I think it was something like 20% of the personnel. Three or four days later, they realized, uh oh that was a mistake. A good, solid, thoughtful process wouldn’t have made a mistake like that. They would have realized from the outset that these are jobs that we aren’t going to be firing, we aren’t going to be eliminating. It seemed to be based on some kind of quota. I don’t know what it is. And then — okay, now we’re seeing everybody being fired who’s on probation. Probationary people, people who work for the government for less than a year or two. Okay, again that’s arbitrary — that’s arbitrary. Being on probation doesn’t mean you’re an effective or not an effective employee. You could be one of the best employees in the whole federal government and you just came on and yet you’re going to be fired. It has nothing to do with the productivity or skill of the worker. It has nothing to do with the importance of the position. It has nothing to do with the effectiveness of the agency in question, serving the people of Maine. If you’re probationary, you’re gone. Here’s another thing about probation. It turns out in the federal government, if you’re promoted, you’re on probation in the new position. You may have worked in the department for five or ten years. You’re on probation. You’re fired. Even though you have five or ten years of experience. And people did get these ridiculous letters saying your performance has not been adequate. There was no basis for those letters. It was arbitrary. And that’s remember I said my categories are thoughtless and dangerous. This is thoughtless — probation. 
    Oh, by the way, about 30% of the federal workforce are veterans. Now, we don’t know the exact figures. That’s one of the problems. We have no transparency about what’s going on here and who’s actually being let go and who isn’t, but a reasonable extrapolation is, 30% of the people being fired are veterans. People who put their lives on the line for this country. And then they went into public service and they’re being fired. That’s outrageous. Again, was no one thinking about this? A thousand people were fired at the V.A. Just a couple of days ago. We learned that people supporting the V.A. crisis line were fired. What genius thought that was a good idea? Last Friday, immigration judges were fired. We’re talking about immigration and border and control of immigration, and we’re firing immigration judges? What possible sense does that make? Here’s one. We’ve had — I think three curious aircraft incidents in the last month, and they just fired I think 300 people at the FAA. Great, including people who are in the business of maintaining the systems that keep our airplanes safe. In the wake of three serious airplane crashes, including one here in Washington that killed 67 people, we’re firing people at the FAA? Give me a break! What kind of sense does that make? What kind of service is that to the people of the United States? Here’s one that’s not life or death, but the National Park Service. 1,000 people were fired last weekend at the National Park Service. I suspect they were probationary, that means okay they’d only been there a year or to. But that doesn’t mean they weren’t in jobs that were important. The headline in this morning’s paper, chaos at the national parks. The lines are twice as long. If there’s chaos at the national parks in February, lord knows what it’s going to be in June or July. In Yosemite, in Acadia in my state of Maine. And here’s a beauty, some of these people that are be fired are people who collect fees at the park. So to save a buck, we’re going to lose $5 from fees not being collected. Genius. Come on. Five percent of the workforce at the national park service are being fired, and I can tell you, I’m the co-chair of the National Park Subcommittee, the Energy & Natural Resources Committee, we need more people at the national parks, not less. We’ve had a staffing shortage going back half a dozen or ten years where visitation is way up and staff is flat or declining. Now it’s really declining. And this is a direct hands-on experience for the American people. Gettysburg — they’ve been laying off people at the battlefield. Last night apparently something called the Presidential Management Fellowship Program, a training program that’s decades’ old that brings talented people into the federal government, eliminated. No explanation, no rational. Eliminated. 
    Okay, that’s the thoughtless part. Let me give you a little personal experience. When I was elected governor of Maine, we had a serious deficit. We were in the middle of a recession. We went through a process very similar to the impetus for what’s going on now. We looked at the entire workforce of the state of Maine. But we did it in a thoughtful and transparent way. We developed a task force that included private citizens, legislators, and members of the administration, and we took eight months, Mr. President, eight months, not eight weeks, and we looked at the entire structure of the state of Maine government and reduced our workforce by about 10%, a significant reduction. But we did it in a thoughtful way and in a way that made sense in terms of the ongoing service to the people of Maine. 
    So it can be done, and I’m not unsympathetic with the idea of making things more efficient. And even possibly downsizing the government where it’s called for and where additional people aren’t necessary. So, I’m not here to say we shouldn’t be looking for efficiency and saying everything in the federal government is perfect. I don’t believe that for a minute. But I think if we’re going to take on this exercise, it ought to be done in a sensible way by people who know what they’re doing. 
    And that brings me to DOGE. I don’t know what they’re doing. Nobody does. I don’t know who these 25-year-olds in the IRS, rummaging around in the IRS I.T. System. We learned the last couple days Social Security. What are they doing? Who are they? What are their qualifications? Do they have security clearances? Do they have conflicts of interest? All of the rules designed to protect us from people making arbitrary decisions that aren’t accountable, you talk about bureaucrats being unaccountable, these are the ultimate unaccountable people. We don’t know what their relationship is to the federal government, what authority they have, up what law they’re operating. It’s clear from mistakes like firing 350 people at the Nuclear Security Agency, they don’t know what they’re doing. They’re firing people who we need. Okay, that’s the thoughtless part. It’s inexcusable. That’s just pure efficiency of government of doing the right thing, and it can be done, but these people aren’t doing it. 
    The second part of what’s going on is the dangerous part, and this is where I call on my colleagues on the other side of the aisle who are standing by and watching our government be attacked with no response. Elimination of entire congressionally created agencies. USAID was established by statute and over a weekend these people fired everybody, closed the agency, took the name off the door, and threw the rest of the world into chaos, where these people were working on important projects all over the world, that were part of our outreach to the world. You know what? As soon as we went out of business at A.I.D., China is right in the market. It’s like walking away from engagement with the world. It couldn’t be a more self-defeating piece of work. By the way, it’s a tiny part of the federal budget. And James Mattis famously said, when he was a general, if you cut the foreign aid budget, you’re going to have to buy me more bullets. Foreign aid is part of the national security of this country, and to demolish this agency without any input from congress, without any relationship to the Foreign Affairs Committee or anybody else up here in the congress, is grossly unconstitutional. It’s grossly unconstitutional. 
    Here’s the problem, Mr. President, this isn’t just a battle between the Senate and the House and the President and they’re fighting about powers. No, the reason the framers designed our Constitution the way they did was that they were afraid of concentrated power. They had just fought a brutal eight-year war with a king. They didn’t want a king. They wanted a constitutional republic, where power was divided between the Congress and the President and the courts, and we are collapsing that structure. And the structure wasn’t there for fun. It wasn’t, hey, we’ll design this complicated system. It was there to protect our freedom. Because the people that wrote our Constitution understood human nature, and they understood a very important thousand-year-old principle — power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
    The whole idea was to divide power, and to the extent we allow this assault on our Constitution, this collapsing and excessive power being granted to the executive to ignore the laws passed by congress, and by the way, appropriations bills are laws passed by congress, which the administration is also ignoring by freezing funding for programs authorized and funded by congress, to the extent we do that, we’re not only making a mistake now, but we’re altering the essential structure of our Constitution that’s there for a reason, that’s there to protect our freedom. And the people cheering this on I fear, in a reasonably short period of time, are going to say where did this go? How did this happen? How did we make our president into a monarch? How did this happen? How it happened is we gave it up! James Madison thought we would fight for our power, but no. Right now, we’re just sitting back and watching it happen. Article 2 of the Constitution, the President said, oh, article 2 gives me a lot of power. No, it doesn’t. It makes the president commander in chief. That’s true. Here’s the key sentence in Article 2 of the constitution, which defines the president’s power, the key sentence is not the power of the president, the responsibility of the president is to take care that the laws being faithfully executed. Not write the laws. Not deny the laws. Not ignore the laws. Not pick which laws he or she To take care that the laws are faithfully executed. That’s the responsibility of the President. 
    Right now, those laws are being ignored. Impoundment. Impoundment. The President trying to say Congress appropriated this money through appropriation bill signed by president, but I’m not going to spend it because I don’t like it, I don’t like that purpose, whatever it is. I’m sorry. It’s absolutely straight up unconstitutional, and it’s illegal. President Nixon tried to do that in 1973, and the Congress, virtually unanimously, passed the impoundment control act which said no, presidents can’t do that. They can’t ignore the will of congress because Article 1 of the Constitution gives the congress the power of the purse. We’re giving it away this week. We’re standing by and watching it, watching the essential power of this body evaporate. Not evaporate, migrate down the street to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. 
    The power was divided for a reason. There’s criticism in the press saying people are talking about a constitutional crisis, they’re crying wolf. This is a constitutional crisis. It’s the most serious assault on our Constitution in the history of this country. It’s the most serious assault on the very structure of our Constitution, which is designed to protect our freedoms and liberty, in the history of this country. It is a constitutional crisis, and I’ll tell you what makes it worse, the President and the Vice President are already hinting that they’re not going to obey decisions of the courts. Many of my friends in this body say it will be hard, we don’t want to buck the President, we’ll let the courts take care of it. Number one, that’s a copout. It’s our responsibility to protect the Constitution. That’s what we swear to when we enter this body. To stand back and say we’re going to watch all this happen, and the courts will take care of it, that’s an abdication of our responsibility. 
    If you look at history, yes, it’s true, presidents have gained power. In my reading of history usually it wasn’t because presidents usurped power, but the congress abdicated it. We haven’t declared war, for example, since 1942, yet that’s a clear responsibility of congress and we sure have been in some scrapes since 1942. We’ve abdicated that power, and we’re now in the process of abdicating the power to control the appropriations process. I mention about DOGE, no authority, no accountability, no transparency, we literally don’t know what they’re doing, we can’t find out what they’re doing. Just this week, the destruction of the independent agencies, created by congress. They were created as independent agencies for a reason, because they didn’t want them to be dominated by the vicissitudes of politics. The president gets to appoint members of the board, and they’re very carefully balanced, not firing someone at the National Labor Relations Board so there’s no quorum so they can’t act. That’s a direct violation of congressionally established policy. These independent agencies were created for a reason. Again, oh, I forgot to mention, illegal firing of inspector generals. The Senator from Iowa is a champion of inspector generals. In the first few days, something like 18 inspector generals were fired, completely contrary to the law. The law is the congress must be given 30 days’ notice of the firing of an inspector general, and reasons therefore. Not done! Not a peep. 
    What’s it going to take for us to wake up, when I say us, I mean this entire body, to wake up to what’s going on here? Is it going to be too late? Is it going to be when the President has secreted all this power and the congress is an afterthought? What’s it going to take? The offenses keep piling up. As I said, leaving it to the courts, number one, is a copout, and number two, when the Vice President said something, I can’t remember exactly what he said, but ‘the courts should not have the power to do this.’ Of course, the President over the weekend famously quoted Napoleon, ‘when you’re saving your country, you don’t have to obey any law.’ Wow, a President of the United States quoting Napoleon about not having to obey the law. 
    So, I intended to talk about Ukraine, but Senator Tillis and Senator Shaheen did it so articulately, I think I’ll let that pass, except to say it’s shameful we’ve suddenly pivoted from the support of a democracy that was grossly and illegally invaded, from the support of that country to the support of a murderous dictator. I heard something about Zelenskyy is a dictator. The only dictator in this game, Mr. President, is Vladimir Putin. He’s the dictator. To argue that somehow Ukraine started the war? What universe is that — is somebody in that would say something like that? Again, I won’t pursue, but I can tell you Putin’s happy, XI Jinping is happy, Iran is happy, North Korea is happy. They love what’s going on, to see us retreating from the world, whether it’s A.I.D. or Ukraine. They love to see us retreating from the world, looking weak and looking unreliable. 
    Finally, on this point, we seem to be systematically alienating our allies. I’ve been on Armed Services for 12 years and have learned that the key asymmetric advantage this country has in the world is allies. China has customers. We have allies. Well, we’re giving that away. If I wasn’t on the floor of the U.S. Senate, I’d use a slightly different term, but we’re giving away our asymmetric advantage in the world by what looks like systematically alienating allies, whether it’s threats of tariffs or speeches in Europe telling them what their problems are, basically saying we’re going to abandon Europe. What a great idea, abandon Europe at a time there’s a murderous dictator with his eyes on the Baltics, Poland, and said he would like to reestablish the Soviet Empire. The worst possible geopolitical thing we could do would be to abandon Ukraine.
    So, Mr. President, this is a constitutional crisis, and we’ve got to respond to it. I’m just waiting for this whole body to stand up and say no, no, we don’t do it this way. We don’t do it this way. We do things constitutionally. Yes, it’s more cumbersome, it’s slower, that’s what the framers intended. They didn’t intend to have an efficient dictatorship, and that’s what we’re headed for. Mr. President, this is a very dangerous moment. We’ve got to wake up, protect this institution, but much more importantly protect the people of the United States of America. Thank you, Mr. President. 

    MIL OSI USA News –

    February 21, 2025
  • MIL-OSI China: Morgan Stanley upgrades stance on China stocks in significant shift

    Source: China State Council Information Office

    Morgan Stanley has upgraded its outlook on offshore Chinese equities, shifting from a bearish to a more optimistic stance, wallstreetcn.com reported on Thursday.

    The firm highlighted a structural shift in the Chinese equity market, projecting that technological breakthroughs will drive a more sustainable rally in China’s stock market.

    After previously being cautious about China’s equities, Morgan Stanley’s change in view signals a fundamental shift in global investors’ attitudes toward Chinese stocks.

    The firm is increasingly confident that the return on equity (ROE) trough for MSCI China is in the past, highlighting three key factors supporting the turnaround namely, improved policy sentiment, geopolitical dynamics and renewed confidence driven by technological breakthroughs.

    Morgan Stanley has raised its target price for the MSCI China Index to 77 by the end of 2025, up from 63, suggesting a potential upside of around 4 percent from Wednesday’s closing price.

    The report also forecasts a structural upward adjustment in MSCI China’s valuation, with the 12-month forward price-to-earnings ratio (P/E ratio) rising from 8-10 times in 2022 to 10-12 times.

    Additionally, several Wall Street investment banks have recently adopted a more positive outlook on Chinese equities following breakthroughs such as DeepSeek’s impact on global markets.

    Goldman Sachs predicts that the widespread adoption of AI could boost Chinese companies’ earnings per share (EPS) by 2.5 percent annually over the next decade.

    These improved growth prospects, coupled with potential confidence gains, could increase the fair value of Chinese stocks by 15-20 percent, potentially attracting over $200 billion in portfolio inflows.

    MIL OSI China News –

    February 21, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Baldwin to Trump: Hold China Accountable for Decades of Cheating American Workers and Shipbuilders

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Wisconsin Tammy Baldwin

    WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, U.S. Senator Tammy Baldwin (D-WI) led a group of her colleagues in calling on President Donald Trump to hold China accountable for cheating trade laws to gain an unfair advantage in the shipbuilding industry. In the final days of the Biden Administration, the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) released a report Senator Baldwin pushed for that confirmed China has used unfair trade practices to undercut American shipbuilding. Now, Senator Baldwin is pushing the Trump Administration to take immediate action to level the playing field for American workers, businesses, and national security.

    “To stand up for the hardworking Americans employed in the shipbuilding industry, those who serve in the military branches that need these vessels, and those who live in communities supported by these jobs, we must act quickly to hold China accountable and reverse the decimation of our maritime strength and capacity inflicted over the last two decades,” wrote Senator Baldwin and the lawmakers in a letter to President Trump. “As we strive to grow the American economy, compete with the PRC, strengthen our ability to engage in international commerce and ensure the American military has the resources necessary to succeed, we urge your Administration to take action regarding the PRC’s actions in the maritime, logistics, and shipbuilding sectors.”

    In March of 2024, Senator Baldwin called on the Biden Administration to fight China’s unfair trade practices, leading her colleagues in support of the United Steelworkers’ (USW) effort to have then-USTR Katherine Tai initiate a full investigation into China’s maritime, logistics, and shipbuilding sectors. The USTR launched an investigation last year, and the report released last month found that China targeted the maritime, logistics, and shipbuilding sectors for dominance, concluding that the PRC’s targeted dominance in these sectors is unreasonable and burdens or restricts U.S. commerce, and is therefore “actionable” under Section 301. 

    The report lays out China’s efforts to target the shipbuilding and maritime industry for dominance – using state-sponsored financial support to elevate their own industry, imposing barriers for foreign firms, and stealing intellectual property to give China’s shipbuilding and maritime industry an advantage. According to the report, China also severely and artificially suppressed labor costs in the maritime, shipbuilding, and logistics sectors, undercutting American workers.

    In her letter to President Trump today, Senator Baldwin called on this administration to act on the results of the investigation that has confirmed China’s unfair trading practices are undercutting American shipbuilding and workers and undermining our economic and national security. Over the last 20 years, the United States has lost industrial shipbuilding capacity while China’s subsidized shipbuilding has only grown. State-owned enterprises and other facilities in China are now capable of producing over 1,000 ocean-going vessels a year, while the United States currently produces fewer than ten. While shipbuilding capacity, suppliers, and shipyards remain vital to the U.S. economy and national security, China’s uncompetitive trade practices have led to 25,000 domestic shipbuilding suppliers leaving the U.S. market over the past 20 years.

    Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), John Fetterman (D-PA), Elissa Slotkin (D-MI), and Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) also signed the letter.

    A full version of this letter is available here and below.

    Dear Mr. Trump:

    We write to you about the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC)’s actions in the maritime, logistics, and shipbuilding sector and urge you to act on the results of the investigation that has confirmed China’s unfair trading practices are undercutting American shipbuilding and workers and undermining our economic and national security.

    Last year, the United Steelworkers (USW) and other unions filed a petition under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974. The United States Trade Representative’s (USTR) responded by initiating an investigation and determined “China has largely achieved its dominance goals, severely disadvantaging U.S. companies, workers, and the U.S. economy generally through lessened competition and commercial opportunities and through the creation of economic security risks from dependencies and vulnerabilities.” USTR found that China’s unfair trade practices in maritime, logistics, and shipbuilding are “actionable,” and we therefore urge your Administration to identify and implement appropriate relief measures and partner with Congress as needed. Enacting strong measures to address the PRC’s actions will be a critical step towards promoting our domestic industrial base, growing America’s economy, creating good-paying jobs in these important sectors, and protecting our national security.

    After World War II, the United States led the world in commercial shipbuilding. Over the last twenty years, the PRC has executed a comprehensive strategy to significantly diminish the shipbuilding industry in the United States and to become the dominant shipbuilding force globally. The PRC can now produce over 1,000 ships per year, while the United States only has the capacity to produce fewer than ten ocean-going vessels per year. America has lost 25,000 domestic shipbuilding suppliers over the last two decades. This drastic difference in capacity is a result of the PRC’s anti-competitive practices to gain an advantage in shipbuilding through unfair and discriminatory tactics, such as government subsidies and favorable loans from PRC-operated banks. According to USTR’s report, the non-market excess capacity in China’s steel sector significantly contributes to the price competitiveness of PRC-made vessels, and there are instances where Chinese steel intended for vessels in Chinese shipyards has been sold at a lower rate than Chinese steel intended for market economies. To give the American shipbuilding industry a more level playing field and the opportunity to grow, China’s harmful, market-distorting practices should be addressed immediately by this Administration.

    The PRC’s dominance in the shipbuilding industry has dire consequences for America’s economic security and national security. It is essential that the United States prioritizes scaling up our shipbuilding capacity, to both guard against the economic harms felt by loss of jobs at shipyards and suppliers, and because privately-owned shipyards provide essential help to build and maintain the Navy’s fleet. To allow the PRC to control the global transportation supply chain is to open the United States and our allies to immeasurable risks, from supply chain shortages to severe national security concerns. USTR’s report describes the dangers of the PRC’s Maritime Silk Road initiative, including a Chinese government-sponsored logistics platform, LOGINK. LOGINK is used in ports around the world and collects information that could easily be manipulated to disrupt supply chains, allow Chinese companies to reduce prices and undermine competitors, and provide details about the movement of sensitive equipment through commercial ports. The PRC cannot be allowed to continue to expand this intelligence network unchecked, or the United States will experience additional economic harm and threaten our  national security.

    Our states are home to companies that specialize in shipbuilding and repair for both the Navy and commercial vessels, as well as suppliers of necessary inputs to build ships. These businesses are significant employers in communities around the country and provide a pathway to the middle class. Retaining these companies and their workforce ensures the knowledge and ability to build vessels, both for military purposes and to transport goods across the world, remains made in America. A shipyard closing or reducing their number of employees, or a supplier shifting their operations overseas, means local economies lose good-paying, often union, jobs, and America takes another step back in the competition with the PRC. To stand up for the hardworking Americans employed in the shipbuilding industry, those who serve in the military branches that need these vessels, and those who live in communities supported by these jobs, we must act quickly to hold China accountable and reverse the decimation of our maritime strength and capacity inflicted over the last two decades.

    As we strive to grow the American economy, compete with the PRC, strengthen our ability to engage in international commerce and ensure the American military has the resources necessary to succeed, we urge your Administration to take action regarding the PRC’s actions in the maritime, logistics, and shipbuilding sectors. USTR’s determination concludes the PRC’s targeting is unreasonable, burdens or restricts U.S. commerce, and that “responsive action is appropriate to obtain the elimination of the acts, policies, or practices covered in the investigation.” The United States must take action expeditiously to address the PRC’s unfair, harmful, and discriminatory practices. Thank you for your attention to this most important matter.

     Sincerely,

    MIL OSI USA News –

    February 21, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Padilla Cosponsors Bill to Block Implementation of Trump’s Blatantly Unconstitutional Attempt to Eliminate Birthright Citizenship

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Alex Padilla (D-Calif.)

    Padilla Cosponsors Bill to Block Implementation of Trump’s Blatantly Unconstitutional Attempt to Eliminate Birthright Citizenship

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — Today, U.S. Senator Alex Padilla (D-Calif.), Ranking Member of the Senate Judiciary Immigration Subcommittee, joined nine of his colleagues in introducing the Born in the USA Act to effectively block the implementation of President Trump’s unconstitutional executive order attempting to end automatic citizenship for children born in the United States, or a similar subsequent executive order. This bill would prevent any government funds from being used to carry out or enforce this or any future directive, as any such order necessarily violates the birthright citizenship provisions in the Constitution.

    Yesterday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld a federal judge’s temporary block on the order’s implementation. The order has been enjoined by at least four federal courts.

    “President Trump’s attempt to end birthright citizenship is an attack on the basic rights enshrined in our Constitution,” said Senator Padilla. “His illegal executive order is nothing more than an attempt to instill fear and chaos in communities throughout America. The Constitution is clear: if you’re born in the United States, you’re a citizen of the United States.”

    Padilla cosponsored the bill, led by Senator Jacky Rosen (D-Nev.), along with Senators Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), Cory Booker (D-N.J.), Catherine Cortez Masto (D-Nev.), Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii), Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.), Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), and Peter Welch (D-Vt.).

    Senator Padilla is a leading voice in Congress opposing President Trump’s anti-immigrant actions and rhetoric. He sharply criticized President Trump’s harmful executive orders targeting immigrants at the start of his Administration. Padilla also opposed advancing the nomination of Attorney General Pam Bondi after she repeatedly refused to affirm that birthright citizenship is the law. Last year, Padilla emphasized the dangers and immense economic costs of the Trump Administration’s mass deportation plans during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing.

    Full text of the Born in the USA Act is available here.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    February 21, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Australia: Australian Education Union annual conference

    Source: Australian Ministers for Education

    Let me begin by acknowledging the Traditional Owners of the land on which we are meeting and pay my respects to elders past, present and emerging.

    There is really only one job in politics I have ever wanted. And this is it. 

    There is one reason more than anything else I wanted to do it. 

    To do what we are doing right now.

    Fixing the funding of our public schools and what it will do.

    I don’t think there’s anything more important than what we do in education. 

    It doesn’t just change lives. 

    Its impact ricochets through generations. If you finish school, your kids are more likely to finish school.

    It changes communities too and it changes countries. It’s changed ours. 

    And public education does most of that heavy lifting. 

    It’s where you’ll find the most disadvantaged children in this country. The children who need our help the most. 

    And these are the schools that are most underfunded. 

    Where the challenges are the greatest. Where the need is the greatest. 

    This is what we’ve got to fix. We have got a long way to go, but a lot has happened in the last 12 months.  

    This time last year I talked about the agreement I had just signed with Western Australia. 

    That extra funding is now in WA schools. 

    Last year I also reached agreements Tasmania, the ACT and the Northern Territory. 

    And that funding is also now rolling out. 

    There’s no public school in the country, apart from the ACT, where funding is at the Gonski level yet.

    And there’s no public school in the country where the disadvantage is as bad or the funding is as low as the Northern Territory. 

    Until this agreement. 

    It was sitting at less than 80 per cent of the SRS. 

    In other words, one in five children in the Northern Territory were effectively not being funded at all. 

    This agreement fixes that. 

    It doubles the amount of money that the Australian Government puts into public schools in the Northern Territory.

    It means instead of reaching full funding in the second half of this century. 

    They will reach it in the next few years.   

    It means that some of the most disadvantaged public schools in this country will now be some of the best funded.

    That’s the sort of thing that will change lives. 

    It is the sort of thing that only Labor Governments do.

    And since I last spoke at this conference, something else just as important has happened. 

    We’ve doubled what we’re offering the states. 

    We will fund the full 5 per cent. What you’ve always asked for. 

    In return, we want the states to get rid of the 4 per cent that is spent on things like capital depreciation – what you have also been calling for. 

    That’s a big shift. 

    And South Australia has signed up to that, Victoria has signed up to that too and so has Western Australia. 

    And I want to do the same across the country. 

    This is a big change, that you have made happen. 

    It still involves the Australian Government and state governments both chipping in. 

    And it still means tying that funding to the sort of things that we know will help children who need extra help and support.

    The sort of things that you’ve been calling for and asking for. 

    Things like extra funding for catch-up tutoring and mental health support.

    And it means being able to see where that money is going. Making sure it goes where it’s needed. The sort of transparency that you’ve been asking for. 

    That’s where we stand today. 

    I can promise you as long as I am in this job, I will not stop fighting for this.

    What I can’t promise you is that this will survive if Peter Dutton becomes Prime Minister. 

    That’s not a threat, it’s just the truth. 

    You just have to look at what they did last time.

    They ripped the guts out of funding for public schools.

    The legislation we have put in place last year will make it hard for him, but not impossible.

    The fact is if he wins he could still reverse that and rip this funding out.

    That’s the truth. 

    There is a lot more to do, I know that, but there is also a lot to fight to keep. 

    I don’t think it is over the top to say that the future of public education is at stake. 

    If this funding gets ripped out again, inevitably it means more kids will leave the public education system. More teachers will leave too, and more kids won’t finish high school. 

    Our schools will become even more segregated than they are today. 

    I know you know this, that’s why you’ve been fighting for this when others haven’t. 

    Fighting for this for more than a decade. Keeping the cause alive. 

    This wouldn’t be happening without you, that’s the truth. But the fight isn’t over yet. 

    Something else I want to talk about today. Something worth celebrating. 

    That’s the pay rises in the last 12 months in NSW, South Australia, Western Australia and the NT and the impact they are having. 

    And the agreements you’ve struck that make a dent in things like workload. Things like more school development days, extra admin support and things like the right to disconnect.

    I remember a primary school teacher telling me once that he carried 30 parents around in his pocket.  

    And that high school teachers carry more than 100. 

    They send him messages often late at night. Not thinking they are bothering him, but that’s just when they’ve got a spare minute when the kids are asleep, but still his phone would ping. 

    That’s what the right to disconnect is all about. That’s why the agreements like the one struck in NSW are so important. 

    There was some good news on Monday that shows the number of teachers last year jumped by about 8,000. That’s good. 

    It doesn’t mean we don’t still have serious teacher shortages, of course we do, but what it shows, I think, is if you pay people more and respect the work they do, more people want to do the job and more people are likely to stay. 

    You can also see the signs of this in the number of people enrolling in teaching courses this year – up 14 per cent. 

    I’ve got to think that’s helped by pay increases, the agreements, but also things like the new Commonwealth Teaching Scholarships – worth about 40 grand or twice the cost of a teaching degree.

    It’s an old school idea that we’ve brought back – we help you cut the costs while you are at uni and you pay it back by working in the public school system when you graduate. 

    And from 1 July this year, for the first time ever, we’ll start providing financial support for teaching students while they do their prac.

    It all helps. It’s all important. 

    I’m not saying all the problems, all the challenges, all the shortages are fixed – they’re not, of course they’re not, but finally, for the first time in a long time things are starting to head in the right direction. 

    Something else I want to mention today and that’s what we are doing before kids ever start kindy or prep, before they step into your classrooms. 

    I think you know what I am about to say, education doesn’t start at 5 and what we do here, in those first five years, has a big impact on the sort of challenges school teachers face. 

    And just like there’s a shortage of teachers in our schools, there’s a real shortage of early educators. 

    A big part of that is just people leaving. 

    When we won the election two and half years ago, they were leaving in droves.

    Many just because they couldn’t afford to keep doing it. They could earn more at Coles or Woolies or Bunnings. 

    That’s now changing. 

    And that’s because of the 15 per cent pay rise that we’re now rolling out. 

    The best example of that is what’s happening at Goodstart, the biggest childcare operator in the country.

    At their centres job applications have now jumped by 35 per cent in the last few months. 

    Expressions of interest have jumped by 50 per cent, and vacancy rates are down by a massive 28 per cent. 

    We’re seeing that sort of thing right across the country.

    Again, it turns out that, if you pay people more, more want to do the job.

    And last week we did something else. We passed laws that will change the lives of some of the most disadvantaged children in Australia. 

    You know these kids. The first time they step into a classroom environment is when they get to school. 

    They never experience early education or don’t get enough of it. 

    One of the reasons for that is a thing called the Activity Test. Something put in place by the Liberal Party that meant parents couldn’t get the Child Care Subsidy. 

    And it meant that their kids start school behind. 

    The legislation we passed through Parliament last week gets rid of that test and replaces it with a three day guarantee. 

    A guarantee of three days a week of government supported early education and care for every child who needs it. 

    No one blinks when you say every child has a right to go to school and government has a responsibility to help fund it. 

    The same has got to be true for early education. That doesn’t mean it should be compulsory. But it should be there for every parent who wants it and every child who needs it. 

    To help make sure they start school ready to go. 

    And that’s what happened last week.

    Again, that’s the sort of reform that only Labor Governments do. And that our country needs. 

    I know there is more to do. 

    I don’t have to convince you of that. 

    And I don’t expect you to stop fighting for it. 

    I hope you don’t.  I know you won’t. 

    So let me end by just saying thank you. 

    Thank you for everything you do. 

    Thank you for working with me over the last two and half years. 

    And thank you for what you are about to do. 

    To help make sure that Peter Dutton doesn’t get the chance to do a Tony Abbott 2.0 and rip everything we have done away.

    MIL OSI News –

    February 21, 2025
  • MIL-Evening Report: The promise of green iron, steel and ammonia is keeping the green hydrogen dream alive

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Changlong Wang, Research fellow in Civil and Environmental Engineering, Monash University

    D.Alimkin, Shutterstock

    Hydrogen was once sold as a universal climate fix — a clean, green wonder fuel for cars, homes, power grids and even global export. But reality has cooled that buzz.

    This week, the South Australian government shelved plans for a A$593 million hydrogen power plant, in favour of injecting that money into the $2.4 billion Whyalla steelworks rescue package. Premier Peter Malinauskas said there was “no point in producing hydrogen” without a customer: the steelworks.

    It’s the latest in a series of setbacks for hydrogen. Last year, Australian mining and energy giant Fortescue pared back its green hydrogen projects as a result of increasing costs and changing financial circumstances in the United States.

    Then, gas and oil heavyweight Woodside withdrew plans for two large-scale green hydrogen projects and Origin Energy dropped out of the Hunter Valley Hydrogen Hub.

    Meanwhile, the Hydrogen Energy Supply Chain project in Victoria, meant to ship hydrogen to Japan, has met with delays and overruns. Earlier this month, the new Queensland government chose to halt further investment in the Central Queensland Hydrogen Project, putting plans to export hydrogen in doubt.

    These setbacks show hydrogen isn’t the ultimate solution to all our energy needs, especially if we want to export it. But they don’t spell doom. Instead, they nudge us toward where hydrogen really shines: in heavy industry, right where it’s made.

    Heavy industry: where hydrogen makes sense

    Heavy industries such as steel manufacturing and ammonia production are where hydrogen proves its worth. These sectors are significant contributors to climate change — steel accounts for about 8% of global greenhouse gas emissions, ammonia a further 2%.

    Most emissions from steelmaking come from burning coal in blast furnaces to convert ore into iron and carbon dioxide.

    In a cleaner alternative, hydrogen (when produced using renewable energy) can be used to strip oxygen from the ore and make iron, with water as a byproduct. The result is green iron, ready to be turned into steel in an electric arc furnace – with a fraction of the emissions.

    Ammonia is used to make fertiliser and industrial chemicals, and hydrogen is one of the main ingredients in its production. Hydrogen bonds with nitrogen from the air to form ammonia. No hydrogen, no ammonia — it’s that simple. Conventional ammonia plants get hydrogen from methane, producing CO₂ in the process. Green ammonia uses renewable energy to produce hydrogen by splitting water via electrolysis.

    Our recent research crunched the numbers on producing these new green commodities. We found making green iron in Australia with hydrogen and shipping it to Europe for steel production could be 21% cheaper than exporting raw iron ore and hydrogen separately. Plus, it could cut emissions by up to 95% compared to traditional methods.

    There are huge economic opportunities for Australia too. Instead of shipping low-value raw materials, Australia could export ready-to-use green iron or green steel, reshaping global supply chains while cutting costs and carbon. That’s the kind of rethink hydrogen enables.

    Industry hubs: a practical fix

    Transporting hydrogen long distances is costly and inefficient. The fix? Industry hubs that produce hydrogen right where it’s needed — next to steel mills, ammonia plants, desalination plants, water treatment plants or even aluminium smelters. Putting producers and consumers together slashes transport costs and unlocks efficiencies.

    We’ve built tools to pinpoint places with the greatest potential to produce these new green commodities.

    The Hydrogen Economic Fairways Tool maps where renewable energy, infrastructure and industrial sites align for cost-effective hydrogen production.

    The Green Steel Economic Fairways Mapper zooms in on prime locations for green steel, spotlighting places such as Eyre Peninsula in SA and the Pilbara in Western Australia, among others (see below). These locations have abundant wind and solar resources alongside an existing industrial base.

    The Green Steel Economic Fairways Mapper compares the levelised cost of steel, including production and transport to the port. a) Regional changes across Australia b) Example of how to optimise the system to minimise the levelised cost of producing 1 million tonnes per annum c) Breakdown of costs d) Hourly system performance, in terms of energy flows.
    Green Steel Economic Fairways Mapper, Geoscience Australia

    Challenges remain

    Green hydrogen promises to revolutionise heavy industries, but significant hurdles stand in the way of widespread domestic adoption. The biggest challenge comes from the unpredictable nature of renewable energy, which makes it hard to maintain the steady hydrogen supply industries need.

    The costs remain steep, too. Splitting water into hydrogen using renewable electricity isn’t cheap, particularly when you need backup storage systems to keep production going during cloudy or windless periods.

    Getting hydrogen where it needs to go poses another major challenge. As hydrogen is both bulky to transport and highly flammable, it requires special handling and infrastructure, driving up costs, especially for facilities far from production sites.

    Many companies also hesitate to invest in hydrogen-compatible equipment, as retrofitting existing plants or building new ones requires substantial upfront costs without guaranteed returns.

    The $2.4 billion rescue package for the Whyalla Steelworks (ABC News)

    Government backing: a push in the right direction

    Thursday’s announcement of A$2.4 billion investment in the Whyalla steelworks along with plans for a $1 billion green iron investment fund are a bold bet on green steel. Furthermore, the landmark Future Made in Australia legislation introduces a $6.7 billion Hydrogen Production Tax Incentive, offering $2 per kilogram of renewable hydrogen produced between 2027–28 and 2039–40, alongside a 10% tax credit for critical minerals processing.

    Meanwhile tax credits for green aluminium and alumina should help another heavy industry to navigate the energy transition using clean hydrogen.

    These measures aim to unlock tens of billions in private investment, boost regional economies, and position Australia as a leader in clean energy manufacturing. This isn’t just about one-off projects. It’s laying the groundwork for hubs that link renewable energy and hydrogen production to industrial demand.

    There’s more in the pipeline. The Hydrogen Headstart program pumps funds into hydrogen innovation, and the Future Made in Australia initiative backs clean industry with billions more. Add in policies like carbon pricing or low-interest loans, and the economics tilt even further toward green steel and ammonia. Government buying power — in the form of procurement targets for low-carbon materials — could seal the deal by guaranteeing demand.

    These policies aren’t just wishful thinking — they’re practical steps that are already working elsewhere. Sweden’s HYBRIT project, which paired green steel with government-backed demand, has already led to construction starting on new industrial-scale green steel facilities. At the same time, the European Union’s hydrogen strategy leans on carbon pricing and subsidies to guide industries and suppliers through the energy transition, while Japan offers incentives for the use of green steel in their automotive industry.

    Australia has the renewable energy and the industrial base to take advantage of these opportunities. With the right leadership, we can turn hydrogen’s stumbles into a global triumph for heavy industry.

    Changlong receives funding from the South Australian Department for Energy and Mining to conduct the SA Green Iron Study, and from Geoscience Australia under the Exploring for the Future program to develop the Hydrogen and Green Steel Economic Fairways tool. Changlong is affiliated with Melbourne Climate Futures, University of Melbourne, and is a visiting fellow at Engineering Science, Oxford University, UK.

    Stuart Walsh receives funding from Geoscience Australia supporting the development of the Bluecap software suite, which highlights opportunities for new renewable energy and critical mineral projects in Australia. Stuart received funding from the South Australian Department for Energy and Mining to conduct the SA Green Iron Study and from Geoscience Australia under the Exploring for the Future program to develop the Hydrogen and Green Steel Economic Fairways tool.

    – ref. The promise of green iron, steel and ammonia is keeping the green hydrogen dream alive – https://theconversation.com/the-promise-of-green-iron-steel-and-ammonia-is-keeping-the-green-hydrogen-dream-alive-250410

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

    February 21, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: As Republicans Propose Budget, Warren Fights Back With 10 Amendments to Block Cost Hikes for Families, Stop Billionaire Tax Cuts, and Hold Elon Musk, DOGE Accountable

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Massachusetts – Elizabeth Warren

    February 20, 2025

    Washington, D.C. – During the Senate’s consideration of the Republican budget resolution, U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) fought back against Republicans’ proposed budget with amendments to block cost increases for families, prevent tax cuts for the rich, and hold Elon Musk and the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) accountable for reckless cuts to government agencies. 

    “While Republicans charge ahead with a budget that will increase costs on families, I have plans to fight back,” said Senator Warren. “Every Republican Senator will have to answer for votes putting billionaires over families.”  

    Senator Warren led the following amendments: 

    Stopping Cost Hikes for Families 

    • Amendment that opposes any final budget legislation that increases grocery costs for American families, including through proposals to cut food assistance programs; 
    • Amendment that opposes any final budget legislation that increases health insurance premiums or out-of-pocket costs through proposals to cut Medicaid and the Affordable Care Act; 
    • Amendment that opposes final budget legislation raising costs for middle-class families while an unelected billionaire illegally directs cuts to key programs like air travel safety, services for veterans, and the integrity of Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid payments;
    • Amendment against final budget legislation while Americans’ Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid benefits are threatened by DOGE infiltrating the Social Security Agency and the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services; 
    • An amendment opposing final budget legislation until funding for the National Institutes of Health for research and clinical trials on rare diseases, pediatric diseases, cancer, or other serious diseases or conditions is restored. 
    • Amendment supporting investments in child care for military families, calling out that Republican plans to increase Pentagon funding are not focused on helping military families. 

    No Tax Cuts for the Rich

    • An amendment opposing tax cuts for the rich, specifically no tax cuts for people making over $10 million annually. 

    DOGE Accountability 

    • Amendment on public financial disclosures for Special Government Employees, pushing to hold Elon Musk accountable while he pursues policies that will benefit himself but hurt hardworking Americans; 
    • Amendment on investigation or criminal prosecution of unlawful misuse of private personal and tax information by DOGE; and 
    • Amendment requiring the Congressional Budget Office to produce a cost estimate for replacing probationary national security employees, fired as a result of Elon Musk and DOGE, with contractors – calling out how Republican plans to remove skilled civil servants will be a big payday to boost defense contractor profits. 

    MIL OSI USA News –

    February 21, 2025
  • MIL-OSI China: China’s pro-consumption policies in full swing

    Source: China State Council Information Office 3

    Chinese consumers have benefited from the country’s pro-consumption policies, which cover goods such as mobile phones, home appliances and automobiles, said the Ministry of Commerce on Thursday.

    As of Wednesday, 169,000 vehicles were scrapped and recycled and 647,000 electric bicycles were traded in for new models nationwide this year under the country’s consumer goods trade-in program, said He Yadong, a spokesperson for the ministry, at a press conference.

    More than 3.97 million consumers purchased over 4.87 million home appliance units during the same period, said the spokesperson.

    From Jan. 20 to Feb. 19, 26.71 million consumers applied for subsidies to purchase new mobile phones, tablets and smartwatches.

    Driven by the pro-consumption policies, related industries have maintained a strong growth momentum.

    Since the beginning of this year, the nationwide vehicle scrapping volume has increased by around 35 percent compared to the same period last year, while the retail sales of new energy passenger vehicles have risen by over 20 percent year on year, He said.

    China announced in early January a raft of measures to expand the scope of the consumer goods trade-in program amid efforts to boost domestic demand and spur economic growth.

    Under the expanded program, categories of home appliances eligible for government subsidies have been increased from eight in 2024 to 12 in 2025.

    Consumers can also enjoy subsidies of up to 500 yuan (about 69.72 U.S. dollars) apiece while purchasing digital products such as mobile phones.

    MIL OSI China News –

    February 21, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Global: It’s the biggest Egyptian tomb discovery in a century. Who was Thutmose II?

    Source: The Conversation – Global Perspectives – By Anna M. Kotarba-Morley, Senior Lecturer in Museum and Curatorial Studies / Research Fellow, University of Adelaide

    Wikimedia/The Conversation

    Archaeologists in Egypt have made an exciting discovery: the tomb of Pharaoh Thutmose II, a ruler who has long been overshadowed by his famous wife and half-sister, Queen Hatshepsut.

    The remarkable find is located in the Western Valley (a burial ground for queens rather than kings), near the complex of Deir el-Bahari, which houses the funerary temple of Hatshepsut. Both of us worked together as archaeologists at this spectacular site some 15 years ago.

    Thutmose II’s tomb has been labelled the first, and biggest, discovery of a royal tomb since Tutankhamun’s tomb was found just over 100 years ago.

    Despite being totally empty, it’s a crucial element in further understanding a transformative period in ancient Egyptian history.

    Hatshepsut’s forgotten brother and husband

    Thutmose II (also called Akheperenre) reigned in the first half of the 15th century BCE. This made him the fourth ruler of the 18th Egyptian Dynasty, which marked the beginning of the New Kingdom period.

    Thutmose II likely ruled for a little over ten years, although some scholars believe his reign may have lasted only three years.

    He was the son of a great pharaoh Thutmose I and his lesser wife, Mutnofret. He married his half-sister Queen Hatshepsut according to the royal custom, to solidify the rule and bloodline. Together they had a daughter named Nefrure.

    Thutmose II’s mummy was discovered in 1881 but his original tomb was unknown until now.
    Wikimedia

    Upon his death, his wife Hatshepsut became the sixth pharaoh of the 18th Dynasty – and arguably one of the most famous and successful female rulers of all time.

    Military activities

    As the successor of Thutmose I, Thutmose II continued his father’s military policy in the southern regions of Egypt.

    According to preserved inscriptions, he ordered the brutal suppression of a rebellion against Egyptian rule in the land of Kush (in present-day north Sudan). As a result, a significant number of prisoners were brought to Egypt – possibly as part of a campaign.

    But Thutmose II’s military campaigns were minor in comparison to the grand conquests of his predecessors and successors. Most historians believe he was a weak ruler and that Hatshepsut had a major role in governing the country, even long before his death. However, others contest this.

    Thutmose II’s short reign left modest traces of building activity in Karnak, one of the largest religious centres in ancient Egypt, located in present-day Luxor.

    The structure, of which only fragments survive, features a unique decoration depicting Thutmose II, Hatshepsut as his royal wife before she became a ruler, and their daughter Nefrure. The origins of the monument are uncertain. It’s possible Thutmose II started it and Hatshepsut finished it.

    The monument was reconstructed by French researchers and can now be admired at the Open Air Museum in Karnak.

    Karnak is one of the most important religious centres in Ancient Egypt.
    Katarzyna Kapiec

    Other monuments of Thutmose II were found in the southern regions of Egypt, such as in Elephantine, in the city of Aswan, and in northern Sudan (likely connected to his military campaigns).

    The condemnation of Hatshepsut’s memory

    Interestingly, the name of Thutmose II became strongly associated with many of Hatshepsut’s constructions due to the actions of Thutmose III.

    Regarded as one of the greatest warriors, military commanders and military strategists of all time, Thutmose III was the nephew and stepson of Hatshepsut, and co-ruled with her as a regent.

    At the end of Thutmose III’s reign, some 20 years after Hatshepsut’s death, he carried out a large-scale campaign to remove or alter Hatshepsut’s names and images. Scholars call this “damnatio memoriae”, or condemnation of the memory.

    An example of Hatshepsut’s ‘damnatio memoriae’ at Deir el-Bahari. Hatshepsut’s cartouches (left) were defaced, while Thutmose III’s (right) remained untouched.
    Wikimedia

    This was likely due to concerns about securing the throne for his successor, Amenhotep II, by linking him to his male ancestors.

    In many cases, Hatshepsut’s name was replaced with that of Thutmose II, making him the principal celebrant in temples built by Hatshepsut, such as in Deir el-Bahari.

    View at the temple of Hatshepsut at Deir el-Bahari at the dawn.
    Katarzyna Kapiec

    What does Thutmose II’s empty tomb tell us?

    The newly discovered tomb reveals fresh details about the status of Thutmose II and his role in the sociopolitical structure of 15th century BCE Egypt – a period of territorial expansion, wealth and political intrigue. It also sheds light on the perception of his rule at the time.

    Thutmose II has been painted as an ineffectual ruler. And the latest findings don’t contradict this.

    Unlike his father Thutmose I, who expanded Egypt’s reign through military strength, or his stepson Thutmose III, who became one of the most famous Egyptian warrior-kings, his modest tomb suggests his legacy may not have been as widely celebrated as others in his dynasty.

    The tomb’s location is also intriguing, as it is near the tombs of royal wives, including the cliff tomb of Hatshepsut, which was prepared for her when she was still a royal wife.

    Thutmose II’s mummy was discovered in the so-called Royal Cache in Deir el-Bahari in 1881, alongside other royal mummies. Many royal mummies were relocated here for protection from flooding and during the uncertain times of the 21st Dynasty (circa 1077–950 BCE), some 400–500 years after Thutmose II’s original burial.

    However, experts suspect Thutmose II’s tomb might have been emptied even earlier due to flooding from a waterfall above it.

    The two of us speculate another tomb may have been built for him, and is still awaiting discovery.

    An 1881 photograph of some of the coffins and mummies found in DB320, taken before the mummies were unwrapped.
    Wikimedia

    Ultimately, Thutmose II’s reign remains shrouded in mystery due to the lack of available records. The search for his tomb – from Western Valley, through the Valley of the Kings, all the way to Deir el-Bahari – spanned centuries.

    Despite its poorly preserved state, and its scarcity compared with Tutankhamun’s splendorous tomb, this discovery will expand our understanding of the overlooked figure of Thutmose II, and the role he played in setting up the reign of Hatshepsut – arguably the most successful of the four female pharaohs.

    In fact, paving the way for the ascent of Hatshepsut may have been his greatest contribution.

    Anna M. Kotarba-Morley receives funding from Australian Research Council and previously received funding from National Centre of Science in Poland.

    Katarzyna Kapiec receives funding from National Science Centre in Poland

    – ref. It’s the biggest Egyptian tomb discovery in a century. Who was Thutmose II? – https://theconversation.com/its-the-biggest-egyptian-tomb-discovery-in-a-century-who-was-thutmose-ii-250432

    MIL OSI – Global Reports –

    February 21, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Welch Amendments to GOP’s Budget Would Lower Costs for Families, Protect Health Care, Combat DOGE, Safeguard Federal Resources 

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Peter Welch (D-Vermont)
    Welch filed more than 70 amendments to the budget resolution 
    WASHINGTON, D.C.—U.S. Senator Peter Welch (D-Vt.), a member of the Senate Finance Committee and Ranking Member of the Agriculture Committee’s Subcommittee on Rural Development, Energy, and Credit, filed amendments to Senate Republicans’ budget resolution which, as proposed, will cut millions in federal funds for working families to give tax cuts to the richest Americans. 
    Senator Welch’s amendments to the Republican budget resolution focus on lowering costs for Vermonters, protecting access to health care, supporting rural care providers, combatting President Trump’s lawlessness and Elon Musk’s DOGE, and defending federal programs and disaster recovery resources Vermont communities rely on. 
    “President Trump and Congressional Republicans are busy trying to pass a massive tax cut for their billionaire friends at the expense of hardworking families, while Democrats are working to lower costs and protect the programs and services Americans depend on. The contrast couldn’t be more clear,” said Sen. Peter Welch. “It’s an absolute disgrace that Republicans are proposing to cut Medicaid funding, kick people off their health care, and are targeting the nutrition programs families need—all to pay for their tax cut.” 
    Senator Welch added: “This will be my first ‘vote-a-rama’ in the Senate, and I can already say this is the image of dysfunctional legislating. We need to return to regular order, respect the regular process, and recommit to finding common ground.”  
    Senate Republicans’ proposed budget blueprint will slash Medicaid and increase health care costs for millions of seniors, children, veterans, people with disabilities, and people with chronic diseases in order to give tax handouts to the ultra-wealthy. Their budget will cut funding for education, scientific research, nutrition programs, and more. 
    Senator Welch filed more than 70 amendments to the budget resolution, including amendments to:  
    Lower Costs for Working Families:   
    Senator Welch filed an amendment to block legislation that reduces or eliminates essential programs like Head Start, child care funding, and Meals on Wheels, which support families, children, and communities. 
    Senator Welch filed amendments to prohibit tax increases for households making less than $200,000 in taxable income and stop any legislation that will increase childhood poverty. 
    Senator Welch filed amendments to prohibit cuts to the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program, the Weatherization Assistance Program, and to improve rural access to nutrition programs. 
    Senator Welch filed amendments to protect rural broadband deployment and promote internet affordability.  
    Senator Welch filed an amendment to block tariffs on energy imports, which would raise costs for consumers.   
    Senator Welch filed amendments to ban the budget from increasing costs for American consumers by repealing investments in renewable energy and energy efficiency.  
    Protect Access to Affordable Health Care and Prescription Drugs:  
    Senator Welch filed amendments to prohibit the reduction or elimination of funding for rural care providers, health centers, and critical access hospitals.   
    Senator Welch filed an amendment to prohibit raising the cost of prescription drugs for seniors.  
    Senator Welch filed amendments to prohibit funding for criminal investigations, prosecutions, and surveillance of women’s reproductive health decisions, including abortion and IVF, and health care providers who provide emergency medical abortions.  
    Senator Welch filed an amendment to prohibit cuts to programs that support substance use disorder treatment and prevention.  
    Defend Federal Programs and Disaster Recovery Resources for Rural America:  
    Senator Welch filed amendments to block the budget resolution from making cuts to critical agriculture programs and ensure communities have the necessary resources for disaster response, recovery and resilience. 
    Senator Welch filed an amendment to ensure USDA’s Rural Development, Farm Service Agency, and Natural Resources Conversation Service State offices operate at full capacity.  
    Senator Welch filed an amendment to support federal dairy programs and improve the resilience of U.S. food systems.  
    Senator Welch filed an amendment that protects Congress’ constitutionally-granted power of the purse and end the Trump Administration’s illegal federal funding freeze. 
    Combat the Influence of President Trump’s Lawlessness and Elon Musk’s DOGE:  
    Senator Welch filed an amendment to prohibit the government from entering into contracts with DOGE-associated officials.  
    Senator Welch filed an amendment to require the staff and activities of the so-called “Department on Government Efficiency” (DOGE) are vetted, have proper oversight, and access to government information is restricted to those with the appropriate security clearances.    
    Senator Welch filed an amendment to require federal agencies to fully comply with all lawfully issued court orders.  

    MIL OSI USA News –

    February 21, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Global: Trump is ruling like a ‘king’, following the Putin model. How can he be stopped?

    Source: The Conversation – Global Perspectives – By William Partlett, Associate Professor of Public Law, The University of Melbourne

    A month in, and it is clear even to conservatives that US President Donald Trump is attempting to fundamentally reshape the role of the American president.

    Trump and his supporters sees the natural authority of the American president in broad terms, similar to those of the Russian president, or a king. Trump, in fact, has already likened himself to a king.

    This desire to “Russify” the presidency is not an accident: Trump and many of his supporters admire the king-like power that Vladimir Putin exercises as Russian president.

    Understanding how Trump is attempting to transform presidential power is key to mobilising in the most effective way to stop it.

    Decrees by a ‘king’

    Russia’s system of government is what I call a “crown-presidential” system, which makes the president a kind of elected king.

    Two powers are central to this role.

    First, like a king, the Russian “crown-president” does not rely on an elected legislature to make policy. Instead, Putin exercises policy-making authority unilaterally via decree.

    Putin has used decrees to wage wars, privatise the economy and even to amend the constitution to lay claim to the parts of Ukraine occupied by Russia since 2014.

    He has also used these decrees in a performative way, for example, by declaring pay raises for all Russian state employees without any ability to enforce it.

    Over the last month, Trump has made similar use of decrees (what the White House now terms “presidential actions”).

    He has issued scores of presidential decrees to unilaterally reshape vast swathes of American policy – far more than past presidents. Trump sees these orders as a way of both exercising and demonstrating his vast presidential power.

    Control over the bureaucracy

    Second, like a king, Putin does not allow the Russian legislature to use the law to organise the executive branch and create agencies independent of presidential control. Instead, he has unquestioned dominance over both the organisation and staffing of the executive branch. This has given him vast power to dominate politics by controlling information gathering and legal prosecutions.

    A similar push is underway in the United States. Trump has appointed key loyalists to head the Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigation.

    Moreover, he is seeking to restructure the executive branch by abolishing some agencies altogether and vastly reducing the size of the workforce in others.

    Can the courts stop Trump?

    Trump’s attempt to Russify the American presidency undermines the American constitutional order.

    Courts are the natural “first responders” in this kind of crisis. And many courts have blocked some of Trump’s early decrees.

    This legal response is important. But it is not enough on it own.

    First, the US Supreme Court might be more willing to accept this expansion of presidential power than lower courts. In a ruling last year, for example, the court granted the president immunity from criminal prosecution, showing itself to be sympathetic to broad understandings of executive power.

    Second, presidential decrees can be easily withdrawn and modified. This can allow Trump and his legal team to recalibrate as his decrees are challenged and find the best test cases to take to the Supreme Court.

    Third, parts of the conservative right have long argued for a far more powerful president. For instance, the idea of a “unitary executive” has been discussed in conservative circles for years. This essentially claims that the president should be able to direct and control the entire executive branch, from the bureaucracy to prosecutors to the FBI.

    These arguments are already being made to justify Trump’s actions. As Elon Musk has said, “you could not ask for a stronger mandate from the public” to reform the executive branch. These arguments will be made to courts to justify Trump’s expansion of power.

    Fourth, even if the Supreme Court does block some decrees, it is possible the White House will simply ignore these actions. We had an early glimpse of this when Trump posted that “He who saves his Country does not violate any Law”.

    Vice President JD Vance has also said judges “aren’t allowed” to block the president’s “legitimate power”.

    The importance of political mobilisation and messaging

    Trump’s aggressive use of presidential power is not just a constitutional crisis, it is a political one. For those seeking to resist, this is too important to just be left to the courts; it must also involve America’s key political institutions.

    The most obvious place to start is in Congress. Lawmakers must act decisively to assert the legal power granted to them in the constitution to check the power of the presidency. This would include active Congressional use of its budgeting power, as well as its oversight powers on the presidency.

    This could happen now if a few Republicans were to take a principled position on important constitutional issues, though nearly all have so far preferred to fall in line. Democrats could retake both branches of Congress in the midterm elections in 2026, though, and assert this power.

    The states can and should also act to resist this expansion of presidential power. This action could take many forms, including refusing to deploy their traditional police powers to enforce decrees they view to be unconstitutional or unlawful.

    In mobilising to defend the constitution, these institutions could appeal to the American people with more than the narrow legal argument that Trump’s acts are unconstitutional. They could also make the broader political argument that turning the American president into a Russian-style, elected king will foster a form of inefficient, unresponsive and corrupt politics.

    Or, in the words of The New York Times columnist Ezra Klein, “it’s the corruption, stupid”.

    Time is of the essence. Russia shows the more time a “crown-president” is able to operate, the more entrenched this system becomes. For those hoping to preserve American democracy, the time is now for not just legal, but political resistance.

    William Partlett does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    – ref. Trump is ruling like a ‘king’, following the Putin model. How can he be stopped? – https://theconversation.com/trump-is-ruling-like-a-king-following-the-putin-model-how-can-he-be-stopped-249721

    MIL OSI – Global Reports –

    February 21, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Kennedy champions bill to expand law enforcement concealed-carry rights, help protect more Americans

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator John Kennedy (Louisiana)
    WASHINGTON – Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.), a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, today reintroduced the Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act (LEOSA) Reform Act to expand the concealed-carry rights of qualified law enforcement officers.
    “Day in and day out, our brave law enforcement officers put their lives on the line to keep Americans safe—even when they’re retired or off-duty. The LEOSA Reform Act would help empower cops to keep our communities safe by expanding their rights to carry concealed firearms in public places,” said Kennedy. 
    The LEOSA Reform Act amends the original LEOSA of 2004, which gives qualified officers—whether they are active-duty, retired or no longer working in law enforcement—the right to carry concealed firearms in any U.S. state or territory, regardless of state or local laws. The original legislation, however, contains numerous exceptions that prevent qualified law enforcement officers from adequately protecting themselves and the public, including bans on concealed-carry rights on certain state, local and federal government property.
    Kennedy’s LEOSA Reform Act would expand the original bill by allowing qualified officers to carry their concealed firearms in the following locations:
    state, local and private property otherwise open to the public;
    national parks; 
    certain federal public access facilities; and
    school zones.
    Sens. Rick Scott (R-Fla.), Cindy Hyde-Smith (R-Miss.), Pete Ricketts (R-Neb.), Bill Hagerty (R-Tenn.), John Cornyn (R-Texas), Jim Justice (R-W.Va.) and Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) co-sponsored the LEOSA Reform Act.
    The LEOSA Reform Act is supported by the National Association of Police Organizations, National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF), National Fraternal Order of Police, National District Attorneys Association, Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association, New York Police Department (NYPD) Sergeants Benevolent Association, Major Cities Chiefs Association, National Organization of Black Law Enforcement Executives, Major County Sheriffs of America and the National Sheriffs’ Association.
    “On behalf of the Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association, I want to extend our sincere gratitude to Senator Kennedy for reintroducing the LEOSA Reform Act. This legislation is a critical step in ensuring that law enforcement officers who have served their country honorably are able to protect themselves and their families after they retire. The LEOSA Reform Act will correct long-standing barriers, ensuring retired officers can carry concealed weapons across state lines without unnecessary restrictions. This law is not just about enhancing officer safety; it’s about honoring those who have dedicated their careers to safeguarding our communities. We urge Congress to pass this important legislation and stand with those who have stood for justice,” said Mathew Silverman, National President of the Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association.
    “While the purpose of LEOSA has always been clear, several actions at the federal, state, and local level have prevented its proper implementation and altered or watered-down key provisions of the Act. The SBA is grateful for Sen. Kennedy’s continued leadership on the ‘LEOSA Reform Act’ to effectuate Congress’ original intent in passing LEOSA in 2004,” said Vincent Vallelong, President of the NYPD Sergeants Benevolent Association. 
    “With the rise in targeted violence against law enforcement officers and violent crimes in our communities, allowing all qualified officers and retirees, who have sworn to serve and protect our communities, to be armed in accordance with LEOSA would allow them to respond more efficiently and effectively in emergencies for the safety of themselves and those around them. The LEOSA Reform Act will go a long way to ensuring all qualified off-duty and retired officers across the country can legally carry their firearm under the law. NAPO thanks Senator Kennedy for his leadership and stands with him in support of this important legislation,” said Bill Johnson, Executive Director of the National Association of Police Organizations.
    “This legislation prioritizes safety in our communities by empowering active and retired law enforcement officers to continue to protect citizens in areas where criminals are known to victimize innocent lives who are otherwise left defenseless. The LEOSA Reform Act enables those individuals we already trust with our safety to be able to continue to provide that service without being encumbered by well-intentioned, but misguided laws. Criminals, by definition, have no respect for the law. This commonsense legislation removes barriers for those who enforce the law. Handcuffs belong on criminals, not law enforcement who are working to protect their communities. NSSF is grateful to Senator John Kennedy for his leadership to improve safety in our communities,” said Lawrence G. Keane, NSSF Senior Vice President and General Counsel.
    “The Major County Sheriffs of America (MCSA) applauds Senator Kennedy for his leadership on the LEOSA Reform Act. This vital legislation allows qualified retired and active law enforcement officers to carry firearms across state lines and in public spaces such as national parks, school zones, and other public properties. For law enforcement officers, the ability to carry a firearm across state lines and in public spaces ensures their continued ability to protect and respond effectively, enhancing safety for both officers and our communities,” said Megan Noland, Executive Director of the MCSA.
    The full bill text is available here.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    February 21, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Australia: Changes to electoral laws [21 February 2025]

    Source: Australian Electoral Commission

    AECMedia

    Updated: 21 February 2025

    New electoral reforms have recently been passed by the Australian Parliament. 

    The Electoral Legislation Amendment (Electoral Reform) Act 2025 received Royal Assent on, Thursday 20 February 2025. The amendments cover the following two areas:

    • the Commonwealth funding and disclosure scheme 
    • Electoral process (machinery) amendments. 

    Financial disclosure reforms: 2026 commencement 

    Australia’s electoral funding and disclosure scheme will be significantly reformed with the reduction of the disclosure threshold to $5,000, the introduction of expedited donation disclosures as well as donation caps and expenditure caps.

    These reforms will commence on 1 July 2026, meaning they will not be in effect for the 2025 federal election.

    Acting Electoral Commissioner Jeff Pope said that the legislative amendments are substantial – the largest in nearly 40 years for funding and disclosure. 

    “The implementation of these reforms is very significant for the AEC – we’re undertaking extensive preparation for changes to our processes, resourcing, tools and systems to successfully deliver the changes,” Mr Pope said.

    Process improvements for the 2025 federal election 

    The machinery amendments are legislative changes that assist the AEC in the modernisation of electoral processes.

    Mr Pope said that these amendments provide improvements for both the AEC in administering the election, and for voters. These changes will be in place for the 2025 federal election.

    “These changes include improvements for voters with a disability and strengthening the appropriate regulation of conduct at polling places,” Mr Pope said.

    Specific examples include: 

    • A change to the terminology of ‘unsound mind’, which many have found an offensive term, to more contemporary language
    • Expressly expanding the grounds for pre-poll and postal voting to people with a disability and their carers
    • Prohibition of filming inside a polling place without permission.

    “Work is underway on the implementation of these and other changes that support a modernised electoral process in preparation for the 2025 federal election,” said Mr Pope.

    Media resource  

    MIL OSI News –

    February 21, 2025
  • MIL-Evening Report: It’s the biggest Egyptian tomb discovery in a century. Who was Thutmose II?

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Anna M. Kotarba-Morley, Senior Lecturer in Museum and Curatorial Studies / Research Fellow, University of Adelaide

    Wikimedia/The Conversation

    Archaeologists in Egypt have made an exciting discovery: the tomb of Pharaoh Thutmose II, a ruler who has long been overshadowed by his famous wife and half-sister, Queen Hatshepsut.

    The remarkable find is located in the Western Valley (a burial ground for queens rather than kings), near the complex of Deir el-Bahari, which houses the funerary temple of Hatshepsut. Both of us worked together as archaeologists at this spectacular site some 15 years ago.

    Thutmose II’s tomb has been labelled the first, and biggest, discovery of a royal tomb since Tutankhamun’s tomb was found just over 100 years ago.

    Despite being totally empty, it’s a crucial element in further understanding a transformative period in ancient Egyptian history.

    Hatshepsut’s forgotten brother and husband

    Thutmose II (also called Akheperenre) reigned in the first half of the 15th century BCE. This made him the fourth ruler of the 18th Egyptian Dynasty, which marked the beginning of the New Kingdom period.

    Thutmose II likely ruled for a little over ten years, although some scholars believe his reign may have lasted only three years.

    He was the son of a great pharaoh Thutmose I and his lesser wife, Mutnofret. He married his half-sister Queen Hatshepsut according to the royal custom, to solidify the rule and bloodline. Together they had a daughter named Nefrure.

    Thutmose II’s mummy was discovered in 1881 but his original tomb was unknown until now.
    Wikimedia

    Upon his death, his wife Hatshepsut became the sixth pharaoh of the 18th Dynasty – and arguably one of the most famous and successful female rulers of all time.

    Military activities

    As the successor of Thutmose I, Thutmose II continued his father’s military policy in the southern regions of Egypt.

    According to preserved inscriptions, he ordered the brutal suppression of a rebellion against Egyptian rule in the land of Kush (in present-day north Sudan). As a result, a significant number of prisoners were brought to Egypt – possibly as part of a campaign.

    But Thutmose II’s military campaigns were minor in comparison to the grand conquests of his predecessors and successors. Most historians believe he was a weak ruler and that Hatshepsut had a major role in governing the country, even long before his death. However, others contest this.

    Thutmose II’s short reign left modest traces of building activity in Karnak, one of the largest religious centres in ancient Egypt, located in present-day Luxor.

    The structure, of which only fragments survive, features a unique decoration depicting Thutmose II, Hatshepsut as his royal wife before she became a ruler, and their daughter Nefrure. The origins of the monument are uncertain. It’s possible Thutmose II started it and Hatshepsut finished it.

    The monument was reconstructed by French researchers and can now be admired at the Open Air Museum in Karnak.

    Karnak is one of the most important religious centres in Ancient Egypt.
    Katarzyna Kapiec

    Other monuments of Thutmose II were found in the southern regions of Egypt, such as in Elephantine, in the city of Aswan, and in northern Sudan (likely connected to his military campaigns).

    The condemnation of Hatshepsut’s memory

    Interestingly, the name of Thutmose II became strongly associated with many of Hatshepsut’s constructions due to the actions of Thutmose III.

    Regarded as one of the greatest warriors, military commanders and military strategists of all time, Thutmose III was the nephew and stepson of Hatshepsut, and co-ruled with her as a regent.

    At the end of Thutmose III’s reign, some 20 years after Hatshepsut’s death, he carried out a large-scale campaign to remove or alter Hatshepsut’s names and images. Scholars call this “damnatio memoriae”, or condemnation of the memory.

    An example of Hatshepsut’s ‘damnatio memoriae’ at Deir el-Bahari. Hatshepsut’s cartouches (left) were defaced, while Thutmose III’s (right) remained untouched.
    Wikimedia

    This was likely due to concerns about securing the throne for his successor, Amenhotep II, by linking him to his male ancestors.

    In many cases, Hatshepsut’s name was replaced with that of Thutmose II, making him the principal celebrant in temples built by Hatshepsut, such as in Deir el-Bahari.

    View at the temple of Hatshepsut at Deir el-Bahari at the dawn.
    Katarzyna Kapiec

    What does Thutmose II’s empty tomb tell us?

    The newly discovered tomb reveals fresh details about the status of Thutmose II and his role in the sociopolitical structure of 15th century BCE Egypt – a period of territorial expansion, wealth and political intrigue. It also sheds light on the perception of his rule at the time.

    Thutmose II has been painted as an ineffectual ruler. And the latest findings don’t contradict this.

    Unlike his father Thutmose I, who expanded Egypt’s reign through military strength, or his stepson Thutmose III, who became one of the most famous Egyptian warrior-kings, his modest tomb suggests his legacy may not have been as widely celebrated as others in his dynasty.

    The tomb’s location is also intriguing, as it is near the tombs of royal wives, including the cliff tomb of Hatshepsut, which was prepared for her when she was still a royal wife.

    Thutmose II’s mummy was discovered in the so-called Royal Cache in Deir el-Bahari in 1881, alongside other royal mummies. Many royal mummies were relocated here for protection from flooding and during the uncertain times of the 21st Dynasty (circa 1077–950 BCE), some 400–500 years after Thutmose II’s original burial.

    However, experts suspect Thutmose II’s tomb might have been emptied even earlier due to flooding from a waterfall above it.

    The two of us speculate another tomb may have been built for him, and is still awaiting discovery.

    An 1881 photograph of some of the coffins and mummies found in DB320, taken before the mummies were unwrapped.
    Wikimedia

    Ultimately, Thutmose II’s reign remains shrouded in mystery due to the lack of available records. The search for his tomb – from Western Valley, through the Valley of the Kings, all the way to Deir el-Bahari – spanned centuries.

    Despite its poorly preserved state, and its scarcity compared with Tutankhamun’s splendorous tomb, this discovery will expand our understanding of the overlooked figure of Thutmose II, and the role he played in setting up the reign of Hatshepsut – arguably the most successful of the four female pharaohs.

    In fact, paving the way for the ascent of Hatshepsut may have been his greatest contribution.

    Anna M. Kotarba-Morley receives funding from Australian Research Council and previously received funding from National Centre of Science in Poland.

    Katarzyna Kapiec receives funding from National Science Centre in Poland

    – ref. It’s the biggest Egyptian tomb discovery in a century. Who was Thutmose II? – https://theconversation.com/its-the-biggest-egyptian-tomb-discovery-in-a-century-who-was-thutmose-ii-250432

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

    February 21, 2025
  • MIL-OSI China: Chinese, Turkish FMs pledge to expand bilateral cooperation

    Source: China State Council Information Office

    Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi on Thursday met with Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan, with both sides pledging to expand bilateral cooperation.

    The meeting was held on the sidelines of the G20 Foreign Ministers’ Meeting in Johannesburg. Wang is also a member of the Political Bureau of the Communist Party of China Central Committee.

    During the meeting, Wang noted that both China and Türkiye are part of the Global South and are accelerating their industrialization, there is significant potential for practical cooperation between the two countries.

    China attaches great importance to the relations with Türkiye and places bilateral ties at an important position in its Middle East diplomacy. China is willing to strengthen communication and coordination with Türkiye, deepen the synergy of development strategies, expand cooperation areas, and bring benefits to the two countries and other countries in the region, said Wang.

    Wang thanked Türkiye for its assistance in the recent evacuation of Chinese citizens from Syria, adding that resolutely fighting terrorism in all forms serves the common interests of both China and Türkiye, and is also a widely shared consensus of the international community.

    China is willing to strengthen counter-terrorism cooperation with Türkiye and jointly safeguard regional and world peace and tranquility, Wang said.

    Fidan, for his part, noted that Türkiye and China have maintained close exchanges at all levels and in all fields in recent years, with meetings of the intergovernmental cooperation committees successfully held, the Middle Corridor and the Belt and Road Initiative smoothly aligned, and China becoming Türkiye’s second-largest trading partner.

    He said that Türkiye is willing to expand trade and investment with China, explore cooperation in emerging fields such as renewable energy, information technology and artificial intelligence, and continue strengthening collaboration on counterterrorism, law enforcement and security at both bilateral and multilateral levels.

    The two sides also exchanged views on regional hotspot issues. Türkiye appreciates China’s just position on issues such as the Ukraine crisis and the Palestinian issue, supports the six-point consensus jointly proposed by China and Brazil, agrees that the two-state solution must be adhered to, and welcomes China’s efforts to strengthen ties with regional countries, said Fidan.

    MIL OSI China News –

    February 21, 2025
  • MIL-OSI China: Chinese, Saudi FMs meet on bilateral relations

    Source: China State Council Information Office

    Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi discussed China-Saudi Arabia relations with his Saudi counterpart Faisal bin Farhan Al Saud on the sidelines of the G20 Foreign Ministers’ Meeting in Johannesburg on Thursday.

    Wang, also a member of the Political Bureau of the Communist Party of China Central Committee, noted that since the establishment of diplomatic ties 35 years ago, China-Saudi Arabia relations have overtaken others from behind and are now at the forefront of China’s relations with Middle East countries.

    China cherishes the mutual trust and friendship established by the top leaders of the two countries and has always placed China-Saudi Arabia relations at a key position in its Middle East diplomacy, Wang underlined.

    China is willing to maintain exchanges at all levels and expand cooperation with Saudi Arabia in fields such as economy, trade, investment, new energy, digital economy, information and telecommunications, and high-end manufacturing, to push China-Saudi Arabia relations to a higher level, he said.

    The foreign minister further said that China appreciates Saudi Arabia’s active mediation of hotspot issues and is happy to see Saudi Arabia play a constructive role in regional peace and stability. With the Palestinian issue at the core of the Middle East issue, China will continue to stand firmly with its Arab brothers and make efforts to correct historical injustice thoroughly, and restore lasting peace in the region at an early date, Wang added.

    For his part, Faisal said that Saudi Arabia and China are comprehensive strategic partners and their relations are of vital importance. He said Saudi Arabia attaches great importance to cooperation with China and looks forward to taking the opportunity of the 35th anniversary of diplomatic ties to strengthen high-level exchanges with China and achieve more successes in bilateral relations.

    Sharing the same philosophy, Saudi Arabia and China are committed to maintaining peace and stability and agree to resolve differences through dialogue, said Faisal.

    Saudi Arabia attaches great importance to China’s role as a major country with important influence, and hopes to find more feasible political solutions to hotspot issues with China’s support, he said.

    Saudi Arabia opposes the forcible displacement of the Palestinian people in Gaza, highly appreciates China’s adherence to principles and upholding justice on the Palestinian-Israeli issue, and hopes and believes that China will continue to play a positive role for peace in the Middle East, Faisal added.

    The two sides also exchanged views on China’s relations with Arab and Gulf countries, and agreed to strengthen communication and coordination to achieve more concrete results in China-Arab and China-Gulf practical cooperation.

    MIL OSI China News –

    February 21, 2025
←Previous Page
1 … 1,337 1,338 1,339 1,340 1,341 … 1,899
Next Page→
NewzIntel.com

NewzIntel.com

MIL Open Source Intelligence

  • Blog
  • About
  • FAQs
  • Authors
  • Events
  • Shop
  • Patterns
  • Themes

Twenty Twenty-Five

Designed with WordPress