NewzIntel.com

    • Checkout Page
    • Contact Us
    • Default Redirect Page
    • Frontpage
    • Home-2
    • Home-3
    • Lost Password
    • Member Login
    • Member LogOut
    • Member TOS Page
    • My Account
    • NewzIntel Alert Control-Panel
    • NewzIntel Latest Reports
    • Post Views Counter
    • Privacy Policy
    • Public Individual Page
    • Register
    • Subscription Plan
    • Thank You Page

Category: Politics

  • MIL-Evening Report: View from the Hill: will Albanese opt for an April election now that a rates cut has him breathing more easily?

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra

    The Reserve Bank has delivered the expected modest rate cut of a quarter of a percentage point, and we’re set for the predictable frenzy of speculation about an April election.

    The cut is unlikely to be a major vote changer, after 13 increases. But it was absolutely vital to the government. Labor would have suffered a big knock if Michele Bullock and her board had held out.

    The cut underpins the narrative of things improving, and may put voters in a better mood. At least that’s the government’s thinking.

    But the bank is highly circumspect in its tone. It warned in its statement:

    The forecasts published today suggest that, if monetary policy is eased too much too soon, disinflation could stall, and inflation would settle above the midpoint of the target range. In removing a little of the policy restrictiveness in its decision today, the Board acknowledges that progress has been made but is cautious about the outlook.

    Speculation about the election date is a frustrating exercise, given only Anthony Albanese – and perhaps a few closest to him – knows his thinking, which could still be, as he suggested recently, “fluid”. In recent days the PM has played the tease. Periodically he talks about the intense work on budget, set for March 25; if that went ahead, it would mean a May election. But last week, he was also talking about parliament having seen its last day, which pointed to April.

    It is hard to see the logic of Albanese launching a campaign before the March 8 Western Australian election, given that would be confusing for both state and federal campaigns and put maximum pressure on Labor’s WA volunteers. If Albanese opts for April 12, he would have to call it immediately after the WA poll.

    Many in the business world would like the election done and dusted ASAP, because the pre-election period means a hiatus of sorts.

    The opinion polls can be read various ways, but as things stand, they point to a minority government.

    This is already putting pressure on crossbenchers, notably the teals, to indicate what factors they’d take into account in deciding who they’d support. The Coalition, if it reached about 72 seats (76 is a majority), would be eyeing off crossbenchers Bob Katter, Rebekha Sharkie, Allegra Spender and Dai Le as potentials to guarantee them confidence and supply. Of course that would assume they all were re-elected.

    But this is putting several carts before the horse. Much will happen in the next few weeks, whether the election is April or May. Current polls that make predictions down to individual seats should be treated with much caution.

    While the polls are presently depressing for Labor, this week’s Newspoll had a finding on inflation that might cheer treasurer Jim Chalmers. It found that less than a quarter of people believe inflation would have been lower under a Coalition government. In other words, while high prices are making voters sour, that is not necessarily directly translating into blame for Labor.

    When the campaign proper is underway, the smallest things can blow up in leaders’ faces.

    Albanese failed to remember key numbers in 2022. He had enough fat so his generally lackluster performance didn’t matter in the end. Dutton is yet to be campaign-tested. Rather disconcertingly for his handlers, in his Sky interview last Sunday he forgot deputy prime minister Richard Marles had just been in Washington.

    Meanwhile Dutton is hard at work humanising his image in a series of interviews, and the obligatory 60 Minutes family get together with Karl Stefanovic (who did the Meet the Morrisons – the Duttons-at-home came without an musical performance).

    Albanese worked hard at this before the last election, repeating over and over his story of being brought up in council housing, son of a single mother.

    Dutton’s more complicated back story involves a stint as a youngster in a butcher’s shop, buying a house at 19, an early divorce, and a failed relationship that produced a baby who became his first child in his second marriage. And of course his career as a policeman.

    One can imagine that some of these memories are painful to have to canvas in public, but the campaign’s hard heads say the public want to know all about a potential PM. So it has to be done.

    (One Dutton incident is rarely recalled these days, that involved a temporary loss of political nerve. In 2009, after a redistribution made his seat of Dickson notionally Labor, Dutton sought to jump to the Gold Coast seat of McPherson. But he was beaten in a preselection by Karen Andrews, who is retiring at this election. That forced him back to Dickson, which he then held at the 2010 election.)

    Albanese does not need to canvass his backstory as much these days but he took advantage of Valentine’s day to put out some sentimental social media fodder.

    He and fiancé Jodie (to whom he proposed on Valentine’s day last year) sat, with Toto between them, turning over cards. with questions said to be posed by the public. With each question (such as “who said I love you first”) they pointed to each other or themselves.

    Opinion was divided about the video. Toto fell into the sceptics’ camp, jumping to the ground before it was finished.

    Michelle Grattan does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    – ref. View from the Hill: will Albanese opt for an April election now that a rates cut has him breathing more easily? – https://theconversation.com/view-from-the-hill-will-albanese-opt-for-an-april-election-now-that-a-rates-cut-has-him-breathing-more-easily-250136

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

    February 18, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Padilla, Schiff, EPW Democrats Demand Answers After Trump Illegally Pulls Zero-Emission Vehicle Infrastructure Funding

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Alex Padilla (D-Calif.)

    Padilla, Schiff, EPW Democrats Demand Answers After Trump Illegally Pulls Zero-Emission Vehicle Infrastructure Funding

    California was set to receive $384 million from National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure program over 5 years
    WASHINGTON, D.C. — U.S. Senators Alex Padilla and Adam Schiff (both D-Calif.), members of the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works (EPW), joined all Democratic members of the Committee in demanding answers from Department of Transportation (DOT) Secretary Sean Duffy about the abrupt cutoff of funds for the National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure (NEVI) Formula Program. The Joint Office of Energy and Transportation approved California’s five-year NEVI Deployment Plan on September 29, 2023, granting the state $384 million for critical zero-emission vehicle infrastructure along its highways, but the Trump Administration has illegally frozen the NEVI program.
    The NEVI program — included in the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law — provides funding directly to states for installing public zero-emission vehicle charging stations, which would lower fuel costs for families, reduce U.S. dependence on fossil fuels, and create construction jobs nationwide. In a memo to state departments of transportation, the Federal Highway Administration announced states will no longer have access to $3 billion in previously approved federal funds for future construction projects.
    “All 50 states plus the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico invested time and resources to prepare their plans, and all plans were approved by the U.S. Department of Transportation. Your abrupt cutoff of NEVI funding disregards these efforts and subjects states and their partners to delay, uncertainty, and bureaucratic red tape. It also threatens the jobs, innovation, and environmental benefits that this program was ready and authorized to deliver through implementation,” wrote the Senators. 
    “Unfortunately, your refusal to release NEVI funds to states is part of a larger, ongoing pattern by the Trump Administration of subverting the Constitution’s dedication to Congress of authority over federal spending,” continued the Senators. “As sweeping and vague as recent Executive Orders may be in expressing the administration’s policy preferences, they do not provide license under the Constitution to cut off funding for programs authorized and funded by Congress and enacted into law, and upon which our sovereign states have justifiably relied.”
    The NEVI program invests in states to accelerate the nationwide buildout of public zero-emission vehicle charging infrastructure. States have already awarded more than $510 million in NEVI funding to construct charging ports, with more contracts ready to move forward. By pulling this funding, the Trump Administration is jeopardizing planned construction that could establish charging stations every 50 miles along 70 percent of major travel corridors by the end of 2055. Canceling this funding would leave many families, particularly in rural communities, without access to affordable zero-emission vehicle chargers.
    Expanding access to reliable chargers will give Americans more choices in vehicles by making clean energy options more practical and by reducing dependence on expensive fossil-fueled cars. If implemented, NEVI investments will help curb the carbon pollution driving climate change, which poses an increasing threat to the U.S. economy and to American families through higher prices for groceries, insurance, and more.
    In addition to Senators Padilla and Schiff, Senators Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), Angela Alsobrooks (D-Md.), Lisa Blunt Rochester (D-Del.), Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.), Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.), Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), and Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) also signed the letter.
    The Senators requested documents and information by February 18, 2025, and an immediate reinstatement of NEVI funding.
    Senator Padilla has consistently fought to reduce emissions across the transportation and freight sectors. Last year, Padilla successfully pushed the Biden Administration to launch a National Zero-Emission Freight Corridor Strategy to guide the national deployment of zero-emission medium- and heavy-duty freight transportation vehicle (ZE-MHDV) charging and fueling infrastructure, which followed his efforts to call on the Joint Office to prioritize the deployment of ZE-MHDV as part of its core mission.
    Since 2024, Senator Padilla has announced over $440 million for zero-emission vehicle charging and fueling infrastructure from the Charging and Fueling Infrastructure Grant Program. In 2023, Padilla, Senator Cory Booker (D-N.J.), and Representative Nanette Díaz Barragán (D-Calif.-44) introduced the bicameral EVs for All Act, legislation that would increase access to zero-emission vehicles for residents of public housing across the nation.
    Full text of the letter is available here and below:
    Dear Secretary Duffy,
    We write in strong opposition to your cutoff of funding for the National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure (NEVI) Formula Program.  This action shows blatant disrespect for the law and for constitutional order.  
    Established in the bipartisan infrastructure law, the NEVI program provides funding for every state in the nation.  As a condition for using this funding, the Biden Administration required each state department of transportation to submit for approval an EV Infrastructure Deployment Plan—a responsible step to encourage states to think carefully about how they spend their funds under this program.  All 50 states plus the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico invested time and resources to prepare their plans, and all plans were approved by the U.S. Department of Transportation.  Your abrupt cutoff of NEVI funding disregards these efforts and subjects states and their partners to delay, uncertainty, and bureaucratic red tape.  It also threatens the jobs, innovation, and environmental benefits that this program was ready and authorized to deliver through implementation.
    Unfortunately, your refusal to release NEVI funds to states is part of a larger, ongoing pattern by the Trump Administration of subverting the Constitution’s delegation to Congress of authority over federal spending.  As sweeping and vague as recent Executive Orders may be in expressing the administration’s policy preferences, they do not provide license under the Constitution to cut off funding for programs authorized and funded by Congress and enacted into law, and upon which our sovereign states have justifiably relied.  
    For these reasons, we urge you to retract your February 6 letter and to implement the law according to your responsibilities.  In addition, in order to assist us in understanding how and why you reached this decision hastily and in blatant disregard of the law, please respond to the following questions and requests for production of documents by no later than February 18, 2025:
    1. On what legal grounds does the Department of Transportation (DOT) believe it has the authority to cancel all funding nationwide for the NEVI program?  Please cite to specific statutory or regulatory authority that permits DOT to cancel such a Congressionally-authorized appropriation.  We note that executive orders do not qualify as such statutory or regulatory authority, as they are neither statutes nor regulations.
    2. Did any individual or office within the White House, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), or the so-called “Department of Government Efficiency” specifically instruct you to cancel funding for the NEVI program?  If so, who did?
    3. Please provide all emails dated November 5, 2024, through February 6, 2025, among and between you, DOT officials, the Trump-Vance Transition Team, the White House, Elon Musk, anyone working for or affiliated with the so-called “Department of Government Efficiency,” Russell Vought, and Office of Management and Budget officials—including but not limited to all “special government employees”—concerning the NEVI program.
    Thank you for your attention to this matter.
    Sincerely,

    MIL OSI USA News –

    February 18, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Economics: African Union Summit: African Development Bank President Highlights a Decade of Economic Transformational Impact

    Source: African Development Bank Group

    African Development Bank Group President Dr. Akinwumi A. Adesina, delivered a compelling farewell address to Heads of State and Government at the 38th African Union Summit, highlighting a decade of remarkable achievements by the Bank in driving Africa’s economic transformation. Adesina’s participation at the august continental gathering in Addis Ababa ended on a high note as African leaders considered and endorsed four Bank-led initiatives including the drive to connect 300 million Africans to electricity by 2030, measuring Africa’s green wealth as part of its GDP, a $20 billion facility to provide Africa with a financial buffer and a roadmap for the continent to achieve inclusive growth and rapid sustainable development.

    Adesina, who is also the Chairman of the Group’s Boards of Directors, underscored the impact of the Bank’s High 5s Agenda—Light up and Power Africa, Feed Africa, Industrialize Africa, Integrate Africa, and Improve the Quality of Life for the People of Africa—which has impacted more than half a billion lives across the continent.

    “It has been an unprecedented partnership to advance the goal of the African Union towards achieving Agenda 2063: the Africa we want,” said Adesina who in February 2022, became the first president of the Bank Group to address the AU Summit.

    During the final day of the assembly, several African governments and AU officials paid tribute to Dr. Adesina for his exceptional leadership of the Bank and strong global advocacy for Africa, He ends his tenure as the Bank Group’s president on 1st September 2025.

    The February 15–16 Summit saw the election of Djibouti’s Foreign Minister Mahmoud Ali Youssouf as Chairperson of the African Union Commission, taking over from Moussa Faki Mahamat. Algeria’s Ambassador, Salma Malika Haddadi, was elected the Commission’s Deputy Chairperson.

    African Development Bank Group President Dr. Akinwumi Adesina, who is also the Chairman of the Group’s Boards of Directors, underscored the impact of the Bank’s operations, which have impacted more than half a billion lives over the past decade.

    Reflecting on his tenure at the helm of the African Development Bank, Dr. Adesina said the Bank has transformed 515 million lives, including 231 million women, over the past decade:

    • 127 million people gained access to better services in terms of health.
    • 61 million people gained access to clean water.
    • 33 million people benefited from improved sanitation.
    • 46 million people gained access to ICT services, and
    • 25 million people gained access to electricity.

    He cited the landmark Africa Energy Summit held in Tanzania in January, where 48 nations signed the Dar Es Salaam Declaration to adopt bold policies in support of an initiative by the World Bank and the African Development Bank to extend electricity access to 300 million Africans by 2030. That meeting, attended by 21 heads of state, secured $48 billion in commitments from the two institutions and an additional $7 billion from other development partners.

    The Addis Ababa Summit endorsed the Dar Es Salaam Energy Declaration, the Baku Declaration by African Heads of State on Measuring the Green Wealth of Africa. The Assembly also adopted the African Financing Stability Mechanism, a groundbreaking initiative by the African Development Bank to provide $20 billion in debt refinancing for African nations alongside  the Strategic Framework on Key Actions to Achieve Inclusive Growth and Sustainable Development in Africa report which  outlines key actions required to enable Africa to achieve, and sustain an annual growth rate of at least 7% of GDP over the next five decades.

    African Heads of State and Government display copies of the Dar es Salaam Energy Declaration at the closing session of the Africa Energy Summit, 28 January 2025.

    On food security, Adesina cited the Bank’s Technologies for African Agricultural Transformation (TAAT), the Dakar 2 Food Summit that mobilized $72 billion in 2023, and the $1.5 billion Africa Emergency Food Production Facility that was launched in May 2022 to avert a major food and fertilizer crisis triggered by global conflicts.

    “The African Development Bank accelerated food production in Africa. Over 101 million people became food secure. We mobilized $72 billion to implement the food and agriculture delivery compacts across the continent,” he stressed. With the support of the Bank, Ethiopia has achieved self-sufficiency in wheat production within four years and is now a wheat-exporting nation.

    A Decade of Transformative Impact

    With a strong focus on job creation, the Bank has trained 1.7 million youth in digital skills and is rolling out Youth Entrepreneurship Investment Banks to drive youth-led economic growth. “Our goal is simple: create youth-based wealth across Africa,” Adesina reiterated.

    Additionally, the Affirmative Finance Action for Women in Africa (AFAWA) initiative has provided $2.5 billion in financing to over 24,000 women-owned businesses, said Adesina.

    “The African Development Bank accelerated food production in Africa. Over 101 million people became food secure. We mobilized $72 billion to implement the food and agriculture delivery compacts across the continent,” said Dr. Adesina.

    Over the past decade, the African Development Bank has invested over $55 billion in infrastructure, making it the largest multilateral financier of African infrastructure.

    The Bank has also prioritized healthcare, committing $3 billion in quality healthcare infrastructure and another $3 billion for pharmaceutical development, including establishing the Africa Pharmaceutical Technology Foundation.

    Historic Financial Mobilization for Africa

    Under Adesina’s presidency, the Bank achieved its largest-ever capital increase, growing from $93 billion in 2015 to $318 billion currently. The most recent replenishment of the African Development Fund, the Bank Group’s concessional window, raised a record $8.9 billion for Africa’s 37 low-income countries, setting the stage for a target of $25 billion for its upcoming 17th replenishment.

    The Africa Investment Forum, a joint effort with eight other partner institutions, has also mobilized over $200 billion in investment commitments, reinforcing Africa as a leading investment destination.

    The Africa Investment Forum, a joint effort with eight other partner institutions, has mobilized over $200 billion in infrastructure investment commitments. (Picture: Africa Investment Forum Founding Partners and other officials during the Opening Session of the Africa Investment Forum 2024 Market Days, Rabat, 4 December 2024.)

    As he bade farewell, the outgoing Bank chief expressed gratitude to the African Heads of State, the African Union Commission, regional economic communities, and the people of Africa for their unwavering support.

    “As today will be my final attendance of the AU Summit as President of the African Development Bank, I would like to use this opportunity to immensely thank your Excellencies Heads of State and Government for your extraordinary support over the past ten years. I am very grateful for your always being there for the African Development Bank—your Bank. I am very grateful for your kindness, friendship, and partnership as we forged global alliances to advance the continent’s interest around the world,” he said. 

    The 2025 Summit under the theme, “Justice for Africans and People of African Descent Through Reparations,” drew global political leaders and other dignitaries, including UN Secretary-General António Guterres, and the Prime Minister of Barbados, Mia Mottley.

    UN Secretary-General António Guterres reiterated calls for reform of the international financial architecture.

    Guterres reiterated calls for reform of the international financial architecture, which is hampering the development of many African economies, beset by expensive debt repayments and high borrowing costs, which limits their capacity to invest in education, health and other essential needs.

    Prime Minister Mottley emphasized Africa’s strategic role in shaping global economic trends, particularly highlighting the continent’s control of 40% of the world’s minerals. She stressed the importance of addressing emerging challenges like artificial intelligence, urging African nations to take a proactive role in technological advancement rather than becoming “victims of technology.”

    She also underscored the urgency of removing artificial barriers between Africa and the Caribbean, calling for the elimination of transit visa requirements to boost trade and integration. Mottley echoed demands for reparatory justice, noting that both the Caribbean and Africa began their independence journey with “chronic deficits” in resources, fairness, and opportunity.

    Opening the Summit on Saturday, Ethiopian Prime Minister Dr. Abiy Ahmed urged continued unity among member countries in addressing the challenges.

    Ethiopian Prime Minister Dr. Abiy Ahmed urged continued unity in addressing Africa’s challenges

    “In a world marked by rapid change and multiple challenges, we find ourselves at the crossroads of uncertainty and opportunity. This movement calls upon us to strengthen our collective resolve, embrace resilience and foster unity across Africa”, he said.

    MIL OSI Economics –

    February 18, 2025
  • MIL-Evening Report: Ukraine isn’t invited to its own peace talks. History is full of such examples – and the results are devastating

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Matt Fitzpatrick, Professor in International History, Flinders University

    (From left to right): Neville Chamberlain, Édouard Daladier, Adolf Hitler, Benito Mussolini, and Italian Foreign Minister Galeazzo Ciano before signing the Munich Agreement, which gave the Sudetenland to Germany. German Federal Archives/Wikimedia Commons

    Ukraine has not been invited to a key meeting between American and Russian officials in Saudi Arabia this week to decide what peace in the country might look like.

    Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said Ukraine will “never accept” any decisions in talks without its participation to end Russia’s three-year war in the country.

    A decision to negotiate the sovereignty of Ukrainians without them – as well as US President Donald Trump’s blatantly extortionate attempt to claim half of Ukraine’s rare mineral wealth as the price for ongoing US support – reveals a lot about how Trump sees Ukraine and Europe.

    But this is not the first time large powers have colluded to negotiate new borders or spheres of influence without the input of the people who live there.

    Such high-handed power politics rarely ends well for those affected, as these seven historical examples show.

    1. The Scramble for Africa

    In the winter of 1884–85, German leader Otto von Bismarck invited the powers of Europe to Berlin for a conference to formalise the division of the entire African continent among them. Not a single African was present at the conference that would come to be known as “The Scramble for Africa”.

    Among other things, the conference led to the creation of the Congo Free State under Belgian control, the site of colonial atrocities that killed millions.

    Germany also established the colony of German South West Africa (present-day Namibia), where the first genocide of the 20th century was later perpetrated against its colonised peoples.

    How the boundaries of Africa changed after the Berlin conference.
    Wikimedia Commons/Somebody500

    2. The Tripartite Convention

    It wasn’t just Africa that was divided up this way. In 1899, Germany and the United States held a conference and forced an agreement on the Samoans to split their islands between the two powers.

    This was despite the Samoans expressing a desire for either self-rule or a confederation of Pacific states with Hawai’i.

    As “compensation” for missing out in Samoa, Britain received uncontested primacy over Tonga.

    German Samoa came under the rule of New Zealand after the first world war and remained a territory until 1962. American Samoa (in addition to several other Pacific islands) remain US territories to this day.

    3. The Sykes-Picot Agreement

    As the first world war was well under way, British and French representatives sat down to agree how they’d divide up the Ottoman Empire after it was over. As an enemy power, the Ottomans were not invited to the talks.

    Together, England’s Mark Sykes and France’s François Georges-Picot redrew the Middle East’s borders in line with their nations’ interests.

    The Sykes-Picot Agreement ran counter to commitments made in a series of letters known as the Hussein-McMahon correspondence. In these letters, Britain promised to support Arab independence from Turkish rule.




    Read more:
    What was the Sykes-Picot agreement, and why does it still affect the Middle East today?


    The Sykes-Picot Agreement also ran counter to promises Britain made in the Balfour Declaration to back Zionists who wanted to build a new Jewish homeland in Ottoman Palestine.

    The agreement became the wellspring of decades of conflict and colonial misrule in the Middle East, the consequences of which continue to be felt today.

    Map showing the areas of control and influence in the Middle East agreed upon between the British and French.
    The National Archives (UK)/Wikimedia Commons

    4. The Munich Agreement

    In September 1938, British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain and French Prime Minister Édouard Daladier met with Italy’s fascist dictator, Benito Mussolini, and Germany’s Adolf Hitler to sign what became known as the Munich Agreement.

    The leaders sought to prevent the spread of war throughout Europe after Hitler’s Nazis had fomented an uprising and began attacking the German-speaking areas of Czechoslovakia known as the Sudetenland. They did this under the pretext of protecting German minorities. No Czechoslovakians were invited to the meeting.

    The meeting is still seen by many as the “Munich Betrayal” – a classic example of a failed appeasement of a belligerent power in the false hope of staving off war.

    5. The Évian Conference

    In 1938, 32 countries met in Évian-les-Bains, France, to decide how to deal with Jewish refugees fleeing persecution in Nazi Germany.

    Before the conference started, Britain and the US had agreed not to put pressure on one another to lift the quota of Jews they would accept in either the US or British Palestine.

    While Golda Meir (the future Israeli leader) attended the conference as an observer, neither she nor any other representatives of the Jewish people were permitted to take part in the negotiations.

    The attendees largely failed to come to an agreement on accepting Jewish refugees, with the exception of the Dominican Republic. And most Jews in Germany were unable to leave before Nazism reached its genocidal nadir in the Holocaust.

    6. The Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact

    As Hitler planned his invasion of Eastern Europe, it became clear his major stumbling block was the Soviet Union. His answer was to sign a disingenuous non-aggression treaty with the USSR.

    Joseph Stalin and Joachim von Ribbentrop after the signing of the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact.
    German Federal Archives/Wikimedia Commons

    The treaty, named after Vyacheslav Molotov and Joachim von Ribbentrop (the Soviet and German foreign ministers), ensured the Soviet Union would not respond when Hitler invaded Poland. It also carved up Europe into Nazi and Soviet spheres. This allowed the Soviets to expand into Romania and the Baltic states, attack Finland and take its own share of Polish territory.

    Unsurprisingly, some in Eastern Europe view the current US-Russia talks over Ukraine’s future as a revival of this kind of secret diplomacy that divided the smaller nations of Europe between large powers in the second world war.

    7. The Yalta Conference

    With the defeat of Nazi Germany imminent, British Prime Minister Winston Churchill, Soviet dictator Josef Stalin and US President Franklin D Roosevelt met in 1945 to decide the fate of postwar Europe. This meeting came to be known as the Yalta Conference.

    Alongside the Potsdam Conference several months later, Yalta created the political architecture that would lead to the Cold War division of Europe.

    At Yalta, the “big three” decided on the division of Germany, while Stalin was also offered a sphere of interest in Eastern Europe.

    This took the form of a series of politically controlled buffer states in Eastern Europe, a model some believe Putin is aiming to emulate today in eastern and southeastern Europe.

    Matt Fitzpatrick receives funding from the Australian Research Council. He is affiliated with the History Council of South Australia.

    – ref. Ukraine isn’t invited to its own peace talks. History is full of such examples – and the results are devastating – https://theconversation.com/ukraine-isnt-invited-to-its-own-peace-talks-history-is-full-of-such-examples-and-the-results-are-devastating-250049

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

    February 18, 2025
  • MIL-Evening Report: Australia is deporting 3 non-citizens from the ‘NZYQ’ group to Nauru. What could it do instead?

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Mary Anne Kenny, Associate Professor, School of Law, Murdoch University

    Australia’s minister for home affairs announced on Sunday that the federal government has struck a deal with Nauru to “resettle” three non-citizens from what’s come to be known as the “NZYQ cohort”.

    The NZYQ cohort is a group of people released from long-term immigration detention after the High Court’s NZYQ 2023 decision.

    The court found their ongoing detention was unconstitutional where there was no reasonable prospect of removing them to another country. This led to the release of over 200 people from detention, the majority of whom had previously had visas cancelled on character grounds or had committed crimes.

    This new deal with Nauru has significant implications.

    What happened on the weekend?

    According to the home affairs minister, three people from the NZYQ group have now been granted 30-year visas by Nauru, and will soon be removed to that country.

    The minister said all three have criminal histories. One has been convicted of murder.

    Nauru may accept more people from the NZYQ cohort, referring to these people as “the first three”. The minister says he expects a legal challenge to their removal.




    Read more:
    High Court reasons on immigration ruling pave way for further legislation


    Why it is this development significant?

    Once a non-citizen has had their visa cancelled on criminal grounds, they are often deported to their country of origin after serving their prison sentence.

    However, the individuals in the NZYQ group cannot be returned to their country of origin. That could be because international law prevents Australia returning them to places where they may face harm (a principle known as “non-refoulement”).

    Or, they may have no recognised nationality and no country to accept them.

    This raises the question of what should be done with them after they complete their prison sentence.

    Up until the decision in NZYQ, people in this situation were simply kept in immigration detention. It was often almost impossible to get another country to accept them.

    The Australian government tried to get many other countries to accept the man at the centre of the NZYQ case. This person, a stateless Rohingnya man given the pseudonym NZYQ, had been convicted of a serious crime.

    The High Court noted no country had a standard practice of resettling people in situations such as this. It noted the immigration department had never successfully transferred such a person to a third country (in other words, to a place that was not Australia, and not their country of origin).

    The Nauru deal announced on the weekend is an important development, in part because it is the first significant use of new migration laws rushed through late last year.

    What do the new migration laws allow?

    These laws aimed to respond to concerns around the NZYQ cohort being released into the community.

    The new laws allow the government to transfer non-citizens to third countries, in this case Nauru, under “third country reception arrangements.”

    The details of these agreements are left entirely to the discretion of government. The laws grant broad powers to remove people and provide payments to those third countries.

    People who may be removed to a third country include those in the NZYQ group who, since the High Court decision, have been living in the community on bridging visas.

    The new laws allow the government to transfer non-citizens to third countries, in this case Nauru.
    Robert Szymanski/Shutterstock

    Why are some concerned?

    A major issue is the uncertainty surrounding the rights and support of individuals sent to Nauru.

    It’s unclear how or whether these people will be able to get housing and access to work, or how they might be treated in a country with high unemployment. Some may have family members in Australia and may be separated indefinitely from them.

    The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees has raised significant concerns around what it calls “externalisation” of international protection obligations without adequate protection safeguards or standards of treatment.

    Externalisation, it says, can lead to

    indefinite “warehousing” of asylum-seekers in isolated places, exposing them to indirect refoulement and other dangers.

    The UN Human Rights Committee has also said that outsourcing operations to another country did not absolve Australia of accountability and its human rights obligations.

    A possible precedent

    A final concern is the precedent this agreement with Nauru sets for how other countries may treat refugees with criminal convictions.

    Australia’s model of offshore processing has already been used as a reference by other countries, including the UK.

    With the growing international debate about managing refugees with criminal convictions, this arrangement may end up being replicated elsewhere.

    The lack of safeguards for people in third countries, such as Nauru, could mean refugees and asylum seekers are transferred without proper protection, exposing them to further harm.

    How do other countries handle cases like this?

    It is not uncommon for countries to send criminal deportees to their home countries. But in situations where people are stateless or cannot be sent home due to a fear of serious harm, countries either have to allow the person to remain or seek an alternative country to send them to.

    However, it remains very hard for countries to convince other countries to accept people who have criminal convictions.

    Earlier this year, US President Donald Trump signed an executive order to prepare a detention facility at Guantanamo Bay in order to hold up to 30,000 “high-priority criminal aliens unlawfully present in the United States”.

    Exact details of the arrangement remain unclear and the plan has been criticised by a range of human rights groups and legal organisations.

    What are the alternatives to Australia’s Nauru plan?

    Other countries have established systems for managing non-citizens who are not entitled to protection or whose visas have been revoked due to criminal offences, ensuring they are not detained indefinitely.

    After completing their prison sentences, these individuals are typically released into the community, where domestic law enforcement handles any further offending.

    Neglecting to address offending behaviour or rehabilitation within the Australian system – whether during imprisonment, detention, or in the community – and then deporting individuals to developing countries doesn’t really solve the problem.

    It simply means we are externalising the problem to a poorer country.

    Mary Anne Kenny has received funding from the ARC. She is a member of the Migration Institute of Australia and the Law Council of Australia and an affiliate of the UNSW Kaldor Centre for International Refugee Law. She previously was an independent advisor to the governments of Australia and Nauru as part of the Joint Advisory Committee on Nauru between 2012 – 2016.

    Lisa van Toor receives funding from Research Training Plan (RTP) scholarship for her PhD. She is currently a PhD student with the UNSW Kaldor Centre for International Refugee Law. She previously was a Judge’s Associate in the Supreme Court of Nauru between 2018-2019. Lisa is a member of the Greens WA.

    – ref. Australia is deporting 3 non-citizens from the ‘NZYQ’ group to Nauru. What could it do instead? – https://theconversation.com/australia-is-deporting-3-non-citizens-from-the-nzyq-group-to-nauru-what-could-it-do-instead-250053

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

    February 18, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Statement from Governor Hochul

    Source: US State of New York

    “Since taking office in 2021, I’ve done everything possible to partner with the City of New York under the leadership of two different mayors. We’ve worked together to fight crime on the streets and subways, close illegal cannabis shops and build more housing through ‘City of Yes’. Bickering between State and City officials is a waste of time and I refuse to go back to the days where our constituents are caught in the crossfire of political turf wars.

    “Earlier today I spoke with First Deputy Mayor Maria Torres-Springer to express my gratitude for her years of service to New York City. She, along with Deputy Mayors Anne Williams-Isom, Meera Joshi and Chauncey Parker, have been strong partners with my Administration across dozens of key issues. If they feel unable to serve in City Hall at this time, that raises serious questions about the long-term future of this Mayoral administration.

    “I recognize the immense responsibility I hold as governor and the constitutional powers granted to this office. In the 235 years of New York State history, these powers have never been utilized to remove a duly-elected mayor; overturning the will of the voters is a serious step that should not be taken lightly. That said, the alleged conduct at City Hall that has been reported over the past two weeks is troubling and cannot be ignored. Tomorrow, I have asked key leaders to meet me at my Manhattan office for a conversation about the path forward, with the goal of ensuring stability for the City of New York.

    “Let me be clear: my most urgent concern is the well-being of my 8.3 million constituents who live in New York City. I will be monitoring this situation extraordinarily closely to ensure that New Yorkers are not being shortchanged by the current crisis in City government.”

    MIL OSI USA News –

    February 18, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Global: Ukraine isn’t invited to its own peace talks. History is full of such examples – and the results are devastating

    Source: The Conversation – Global Perspectives – By Matt Fitzpatrick, Professor in International History, Flinders University

    (From left to right): Neville Chamberlain, Édouard Daladier, Adolf Hitler, Benito Mussolini, and Italian Foreign Minister Galeazzo Ciano before signing the Munich Agreement, which gave the Sudetenland to Germany. German Federal Archives/Wikimedia Commons

    Ukraine has not been invited to a key meeting between American and Russian officials in Saudi Arabia this week to decide what peace in the country might look like.

    Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said Ukraine will “never accept” any decisions in talks without its participation to end Russia’s three-year war in the country.

    A decision to negotiate the sovereignty of Ukrainians without them – as well as US President Donald Trump’s blatantly extortionate attempt to claim half of Ukraine’s rare mineral wealth as the price for ongoing US support – reveals a lot about how Trump sees Ukraine and Europe.

    But this is not the first time large powers have colluded to negotiate new borders or spheres of influence without the input of the people who live there.

    Such high-handed power politics rarely ends well for those affected, as these seven historical examples show.

    1. The Scramble for Africa

    In the winter of 1884–85, German leader Otto von Bismarck invited the powers of Europe to Berlin for a conference to formalise the division of the entire African continent among them. Not a single African was present at the conference that would come to be known as “The Scramble for Africa”.

    Among other things, the conference led to the creation of the Congo Free State under Belgian control, the site of colonial atrocities that killed millions.

    Germany also established the colony of German South West Africa (present-day Namibia), where the first genocide of the 20th century was later perpetrated against its colonised peoples.

    How the boundaries of Africa changed after the Berlin conference.
    Wikimedia Commons/Somebody500

    2. The Tripartite Convention

    It wasn’t just Africa that was divided up this way. In 1899, Germany and the United States held a conference and forced an agreement on the Samoans to split their islands between the two powers.

    This was despite the Samoans expressing a desire for either self-rule or a confederation of Pacific states with Hawai’i.

    As “compensation” for missing out in Samoa, Britain received uncontested primacy over Tonga.

    German Samoa came under the rule of New Zealand after the first world war and remained a territory until 1962. American Samoa (in addition to several other Pacific islands) remain US territories to this day.

    3. The Sykes-Picot Agreement

    As the first world war was well under way, British and French representatives sat down to agree how they’d divide up the Ottoman Empire after it was over. As an enemy power, the Ottomans were not invited to the talks.

    Together, England’s Mark Sykes and France’s François Georges-Picot redrew the Middle East’s borders in line with their nations’ interests.

    The Sykes-Picot Agreement ran counter to commitments made in a series of letters known as the Hussein-McMahon correspondence. In these letters, Britain promised to support Arab independence from Turkish rule.




    Read more:
    What was the Sykes-Picot agreement, and why does it still affect the Middle East today?


    The Sykes-Picot Agreement also ran counter to promises Britain made in the Balfour Declaration to back Zionists who wanted to build a new Jewish homeland in Ottoman Palestine.

    The agreement became the wellspring of decades of conflict and colonial misrule in the Middle East, the consequences of which continue to be felt today.

    Map showing the areas of control and influence in the Middle East agreed upon between the British and French.
    The National Archives (UK)/Wikimedia Commons

    4. The Munich Agreement

    In September 1938, British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain and French Prime Minister Édouard Daladier met with Italy’s fascist dictator, Benito Mussolini, and Germany’s Adolf Hitler to sign what became known as the Munich Agreement.

    The leaders sought to prevent the spread of war throughout Europe after Hitler’s Nazis had fomented an uprising and began attacking the German-speaking areas of Czechoslovakia known as the Sudetenland. They did this under the pretext of protecting German minorities. No Czechoslovakians were invited to the meeting.

    The meeting is still seen by many as the “Munich Betrayal” – a classic example of a failed appeasement of a belligerent power in the false hope of staving off war.

    5. The Évian Conference

    In 1938, 32 countries met in Évian-les-Bains, France, to decide how to deal with Jewish refugees fleeing persecution in Nazi Germany.

    Before the conference started, Britain and the US had agreed not to put pressure on one another to lift the quota of Jews they would accept in either the US or British Palestine.

    While Golda Meir (the future Israeli leader) attended the conference as an observer, neither she nor any other representatives of the Jewish people were permitted to take part in the negotiations.

    The attendees largely failed to come to an agreement on accepting Jewish refugees, with the exception of the Dominican Republic. And most Jews in Germany were unable to leave before Nazism reached its genocidal nadir in the Holocaust.

    6. The Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact

    As Hitler planned his invasion of Eastern Europe, it became clear his major stumbling block was the Soviet Union. His answer was to sign a disingenuous non-aggression treaty with the USSR.

    Joseph Stalin and Joachim von Ribbentrop after the signing of the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact.
    German Federal Archives/Wikimedia Commons

    The treaty, named after Vyacheslav Molotov and Joachim von Ribbentrop (the Soviet and German foreign ministers), ensured the Soviet Union would not respond when Hitler invaded Poland. It also carved up Europe into Nazi and Soviet spheres. This allowed the Soviets to expand into Romania and the Baltic states, attack Finland and take its own share of Polish territory.

    Unsurprisingly, some in Eastern Europe view the current US-Russia talks over Ukraine’s future as a revival of this kind of secret diplomacy that divided the smaller nations of Europe between large powers in the second world war.

    7. The Yalta Conference

    With the defeat of Nazi Germany imminent, British Prime Minister Winston Churchill, Soviet dictator Josef Stalin and US President Franklin D Roosevelt met in 1945 to decide the fate of postwar Europe. This meeting came to be known as the Yalta Conference.

    Alongside the Potsdam Conference several months later, Yalta created the political architecture that would lead to the Cold War division of Europe.

    At Yalta, the “big three” decided on the division of Germany, while Stalin was also offered a sphere of interest in Eastern Europe.

    This took the form of a series of politically controlled buffer states in Eastern Europe, a model some believe Putin is aiming to emulate today in eastern and southeastern Europe.

    Matt Fitzpatrick receives funding from the Australian Research Council. He is affiliated with the History Council of South Australia.

    – ref. Ukraine isn’t invited to its own peace talks. History is full of such examples – and the results are devastating – https://theconversation.com/ukraine-isnt-invited-to-its-own-peace-talks-history-is-full-of-such-examples-and-the-results-are-devastating-250049

    MIL OSI – Global Reports –

    February 18, 2025
  • MIL-OSI China: New consumption frontiers energize China’s market vitality

    Source: China State Council Information Office

    Global financial institutions are increasingly bullish on China’s economic development, with multiple 2025 outlook reports highlighting the nation’s accelerating transition to high-quality growth driven by a stronger consumer sector and service industry.

    During the recent Spring Festival, China witnessed a burgeoning consumption market, marked by record-setting sales revenues in “Guochao” — or trendy merchandise inspired by traditional Chinese culture — along with new records in intangible cultural heritage experiences, the ice and snow economy, and consumer goods trade-in programs. Driven by digital transition and technological development, new consumption models have continued to emerge.

    Analysts noted that emerging consumption trends — from product launches to winter sports and silver-haired consumer markets — demonstrate China’s evolving consumer landscape and its potential for sustained growth.

    Trendsetters Trade up

    Shanghai’s debut economy is transforming the city’s retail landscape, increasingly led by homegrown brands launching global flagship stores. A notable example is SHUSHU/TONG, a local designer label that chose Shanghai’s Jing’an District for its first global store. The store has since become a magnet for international visitors, especially from the Republic of Korea (ROK).

    The store has evolved into a social media hotspot, where Korean visitors frequently create content for platforms like rednote, sharing their shopping experiences and fashion discoveries. This organic promotion has significantly boosted the store’s international profile.

    “New customers now make up half of our foot traffic, with ROK visitors accounting for 80 percent of first-time shoppers,” says Yu Yaqi, head of SHUSHU/TONG’s offline operations. “To better serve our international clientele, we’re streamlining membership registration for foreign customers and optimizing our product display and inventory to match visitor preferences.”

    China’s policymakers have identified the debut economy as a key driver of growth, making it a 2025 priority at December’s Central Economic Work Conference. This strategic focus aims to upgrade consumption quality and accelerate industrial transformation, with regional governments already implementing supportive measures.

    Positioned as a global hub for product debuts, flagship store launches and exclusive exhibitions, Shanghai is leveraging this innovative model. The policy blueprint includes an annual “FIRST in Shanghai” flagship event from March to May, designed to attract global attention as a premier platform for product launches.

    Looking ahead to 2025, the city’s government work report prioritizes scaling up the debut economy, along with emerging consumption sectors such as automobiles and green consumption.

    Frost to Fortune

    “Endless snow slopes stretch before my eyes, with the howling wind echoing in my ears: That feeling of free flight delivers a unique thrill,” said 28-year-old Sun Hong, an avid skier who travels to different resorts each winter to seek fresh experiences.

    Winter tourism has become a major driver of China’s economy, sparking nationwide interest in cold-weather activities.

    Different regions have developed distinctive winter tourism offerings: Southwest China’s Chongqing Municipality focuses on themed events and travel routes, southern Guangdong Province provides year-round indoor snow activities, while Xinjiang’s Altay region features unique ethnic winter experiences.

    Dai Bin, president of the China Tourism Academy, highlighted the role of technology and investment in promoting winter sports, with artificial snow and ice facilities making winter sports accessible even in the warmest regions.

    A survey from the academy showed more than 70 percent of the respondents are willing to engage in winter leisure activities, with over 60 percent planning to maintain or increase their spending on winter tourism. The 2024-2025 winter season is expected to attract some 520 million trips, generating over 630 billion yuan (about 87.86 billion U.S. dollars) in tourism revenue.

    Winter has evolved from a season of dormancy to one of vibrant activities, Dai noted. “In the past, winter meant freezing temperatures and a pause in daily life. Now, people embrace the cold and explore northern regions.”

    Silver is the New Gold

    Local governments have prioritized expanding elderly care products and services in their 2025 agendas. Guangdong plans to enhance research and development (R&D) and promotion of senior-friendly products while accelerating the rehabilitation assistive devices industry.

    Heilongjiang aims to boost service-oriented consumption in digital, elderly care and childcare sectors, with a focus on developing traditional Chinese medicine-based wellness and smart elderly care. Shanghai will deepen the application of technologies like smart nursing homes in elderly care scenarios.

    The economic potential is substantial. According to a recent blue paper on China’s silver economy, the sector is currently valued at 7 trillion yuan, with tourism being a key growth area.

    Elderly adults in China had amassed wealth totaling 78.4 trillion yuan by 2023, according to the China National Committee on Ageing. The silver economy is projected to reach 30 trillion yuan by 2035.

    The silver economy is creating new growth opportunities across multiple industries. “A growing number of seniors are demanding higher quality of life, prioritizing health and fashion, making the anti-aging industry particularly promising,” said Chen Juanling, a Shanghai municipal lawmaker and public affairs general manager of cosmetics brand Chando Group. 

    MIL OSI China News –

    February 18, 2025
  • MIL-OSI China: China firmly opposes any attempt to interfere in its internal affairs

    Source: China State Council Information Office

    China firmly opposes relevant countries’ attempts to put together small circles to interfere in China’s internal affairs, attack and smear China, and stoke confrontation and antagonism, a Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson said on Monday.

    Spokesperson Guo Jiakun made the remarks at a daily press briefing when asked to comment on a joint statement made by the Republic of Korea, the United States and Japan in Munich, Germany, which contains negative comments regarding China’s Taiwan and the South China Sea issue.

    “We’ve lodged serious representations with relevant countries,” Guo said.

    Noting Taiwan is an inalienable part of China’s territory, Guo said the Taiwan question is purely an internal affair of China, which brooks no external interference.

    The key to upholding peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait lies in abiding by the one-China principle, and firmly opposing “Taiwan independence” separatism, said Guo, adding the Taiwan region’s participation in the activities of international organizations must and can only be handled in line with the one-China principle.

    The spokesperson stressed that the Asia-Pacific is a stellar example of peace and development, not a chessboard for geopolitical contests. “We call on relevant parties to earnestly respect regional countries’ effort for peace and stability, abandon the Cold War mentality, stop creating bloc confrontation and stop fueling tensions in the region,” he said.

    “China will firmly safeguard territorial sovereignty and maritime rights and interests, and meanwhile, stays committed to properly handling differences through dialogue and consultation with countries concerned,” Guo said.

    MIL OSI China News –

    February 18, 2025
  • MIL-OSI China: China steadfastly promotes economic globalization, multipolar world: Spokesperson

    Source: China State Council Information Office

    Journalists work at the media center of the 61st Munich Security Conference in Munich, Germany, Feb. 16, 2025. [Photo/Xinhua]

    China firmly promotes a universally beneficial and inclusive economic globalization, and supports an equal and orderly multipolar world that “is becoming a reality,” Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun said in Beijing on Monday.

    China will be a factor of certainty in this multipolar system and strive to be a steadfast constructive force in a changing world, Guo told a daily news briefing, citing Foreign Minister Wang Yi’s keynote speech at the 61st Munich Security Conference.

    Guo said “equal” means equal rights, opportunities and rules, and that all countries, big or small, are equal.

    Instead of having international affairs dominated by a few countries or such countries conducting hegemonism and power politics, each country or country group should have its place in the globalized system, he said.

    “An orderly world ensures stable progress toward greater multipolarity instead of leading to turbulence,” the spokesperson said.

    To this end, all countries need to respect international rule of law, practice multilateralism, pursue openness and mutual benefit, jointly uphold the purposes and principles of the UN Charter, preserve the central role of the United Nations in the international system, and promote the common development of every country, he added.

    China has firmly upheld the authority and stature of the United Nations, called for increasing the representation and say of developing countries in the international system, resolutely safeguarded the authority of international rule of law, and upheld true multilateralism, he said.

    “We stay committed to sharing development opportunities with all countries, and promote a universally beneficial and inclusive economic globalization and support an equal and orderly multipolar world through our own high-quality development and high-standard opening up,” he added.

    MIL OSI China News –

    February 18, 2025
  • MIL-OSI China: China urges US to correct mistakes in Taiwan wording on State Department website

    Source: China State Council Information Office

    The so-called “update” to the Taiwan fact sheet displayed on the U.S. State Department website is another example of the U.S. side using the Taiwan question to contain China, and China urges the United States to immediately correct its mistakes, Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun said Monday.

    It was reported that the U.S. State Department had made an “update” to the Taiwan fact sheet displayed on its website, which has removed its previous wording saying it did not support Taiwan’s independence.

    Guo reiterated that there is only one China and Taiwan is part of China, and the government of the People’s Republic of China is the only legal government representing the whole of China, adding that it is a prevailing international consensus and basic norm governing international relations, and also a solemn commitment the U.S. has made in the three China-U.S. joint communiqués.

    Guo stressed that the revision made by the U.S. Department of State on its Taiwan fact sheet gravely backpedaled on its position on Taiwan-related issues, and has sent a severely wrong signal to “Taiwan independence” separatist forces.

    “We urge the U.S. to immediately correct its wrongdoings, abide by the one-China principle and three China-U.S. joint communiqués,” Guo said, urging the U.S. side to stop upgrading substantive relations with Taiwan, refrain from assisting Taiwan in expanding its international space, and stop emboldening and supporting “Taiwan independence,” and avoid further severe damage to China-U.S. relations and peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait.

    MIL OSI China News –

    February 18, 2025
  • MIL-OSI China: China welcomes all efforts dedicated to peace in Ukraine

    Source: China State Council Information Office

    This photo taken on Feb. 27, 2022 shows smoke rising in the sky in Kiev, Ukraine. [Photo/Xinhua]

    China welcomes all efforts dedicated to peace in Ukraine, including the recent agreement reached by the United States and Russia to start peace talks, Fu Cong, China’s permanent representative to the United Nations, said on Monday.

    In remarks at the UN Security Council briefing on Ukraine, Fu said China has consistently advocated for settling global disputes and conflicts peacefully through dialogue and consultation in accordance with the UN Charter, and this applies equally to the Ukraine issue.

    He recalled that 10 years ago, the parties concerned with the Ukraine issue reached the Minsk Agreements through negotiations, and that the agreements were subsequently endorsed by the Security Council in its Resolution 2202, which “represents the right direction of resolving differences and disputes through dialogue and negotiation.”

    “Regrettably, after the conclusion of the agreements, most of the provisions were not fully and effectively implemented,” the ambassador said, adding that the situation that should have gradually deescalated has instead become even more tense, ultimately leading to the full escalation of the crisis and a large-scale conflict that continues to this day.

    “The failure of the Minsk Agreements is deplorable, and its historical lessons warrant deep reflection,” Fu said.

    He stressed that from the day after the crisis broke out, China has called for a political solution through dialogue and consultation, noting that the four-point proposal — the sovereignty and territorial integrity of all countries should be respected, the purposes and principles of the UN Charter observed, the legitimate security concerns of all countries given due regard, and all efforts conducive to the peaceful settlement of the crisis supported — is China’s fundamental guidance on the Ukraine issue.

    China has been actively engaged in diplomatic mediation and maintains contact with relevant parties, including Russia and Ukraine, has had in-depth participation in the consideration of the Ukraine issue under the framework of the United Nations and its Security Council, and plays a constructive role in promoting ceasefire and political settlement, Fu said.

    China has also partnered with Brazil and other countries in creating the Group of Friends for Peace to garner the collective wisdom of the countries of the Global South and form an important force for peace, said the ambassador. “The evolving situation has proven that China’s proposal is objective, fair, rational, and pragmatic, reflecting the broad consensus of the international community.”

    Fu pointed out that at present, the Ukraine issue is about to reach a critical moment for a negotiated settlement, and “the ultimate resolution of any conflict lies at the negotiation table, and history will undoubtedly deliver a just outcome.”

    He expressed the hope that all relevant parties and stakeholders involved in the Ukraine crisis will engage in the peace talks process, and reach a fair, lasting, and binding peace agreement acceptable to all parties.

    “As the conflict has been unfolding on European soil, it is imperative for Europe to work for peace,” Fu said.

    “We hope the parties will jointly address the root causes of the crisis through negotiation and find a balanced, effective, and sustainable security framework for lasting stability in the region,” he said.

    MIL OSI China News –

    February 18, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Ernst Targets Welfare for Politicians on Presidents’ Day

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Joni Ernst (R-IA)
    WASHINGTON – As Americans celebrate Presidents’ Day, Senate DOGE Caucus Chair Joni Ernst (R-Iowa) is introducing a pair of bills to ensure that tax dollars are spent to benefit all Americans instead of Washington insiders.
    Ernst’s legislation will eliminate tax dollars for political campaigns and reduce cushy benefits for former presidents.
    “This Presidents’ Day I am fighting for the integrity of the office because the last thing we need to spend tax dollars on is more attack ads and cushy perks for politicians,” said Ernst. “There is no better way to pay down the $36 trillion debt than by defunding welfare for political campaigns. Washington should be working to benefit all Americans instead of itself.” There is currently $400 million sitting in the fund.
    The ELECT Act eliminates the Presidential Election Campaign Fund, which utilizes tax dollars to fund presidential campaigns, and uses the remaining money to pay down the national debt.
    The Presidential Allowance Modernization Act reforms the compensation package provided to former presidents by cutting perks such as office space, staff, and travel expenses while retaining presidential pensions, security, and allowances.
    Background:
    No candidate who has taken the money from the Presidential Campaign Fund has won the presidential election in the last 20 years.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    February 18, 2025
  • MIL-OSI China: African leaders call for immediate withdrawal of M23 rebels from DRC

    Source: China State Council Information Office 3

    African leaders attending the 38th African Union (AU) Summit have urged immediate withdrawal of the March 23 Movement (M23) armed group from the eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC).

    In a press conference on the sidelines of the AU Summit on Sunday in Addis Ababa, the capital of Ethiopia, AU Commissioner for Political Affairs, Peace and Security Bankole Adeoye said African leaders called for the preservation and total respect of the sovereignty, political unity and territorial integrity of the DRC.

    “We are clearly expressing great concern, and what leaders did too, in the situation in the eastern DRC, calling for immediate withdrawal of the M23 and their supporters from all occupied towns and cities, including Goma airport in the eastern DRC,” Adeoye said.

    The commissioner noted that the continental bloc is closely following the crisis and pushing forward effective implementation of the Luanda and Nairobi processes.

    “It is also important to emphasize that leaders even at the assembly and the level of the peace and security council also agreed to ensure that the two processes, popularly called Luanda and Nairobi processes, remain the best form of dialogue framework for all parties,” he said.

    According to Adeoye, the continental bloc condemned illegal mineral exploitation and other natural resources in the region, which complicated the crisis. The AU called on all parties to the conflict in the eastern DRC to embrace reconciliation and dialogue.

    The M23 rebels entered Bukavu, a major city in the region, on Sunday. The armed group has been advancing since seizing the region’s largest city, Goma, in late January. 

    MIL OSI China News –

    February 18, 2025
  • MIL-OSI China: ‘Everything’ on table to retaliate against U.S. tariffs: Canadian trade minister

    Source: China State Council Information Office

    The Canadian government is ready to retaliate against U.S. tariffs, the nation’s trade minister told Australian media on Monday.

    Mary Ng, Canada’s minister of export promotion, international trade and economic development, said during an official visit to Australia that the U.S. government’s promised tariffs will “simply create costs for Americans.”

    U.S. President Donald Trump earlier in February agreed to pause a 25 percent tariff on all goods imported to the United States from Canada and Mexico except for energy products, which will face 10 percent tariffs, for 30 days.

    Ng told Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) television on Monday night that Canada is ready to retaliate if the tariffs are implemented.

    “Should Canada get tariffs that are punishing, tariffs that will hurt our economy, everything will be on the table,” she said. “We will respond, and we will respond with impact.”

    The Australian government has said it is working on an exemption from U.S. 25 percent tariffs on all steel and aluminum imports.

    Ng, who is in Australia leading a delegation of 140 Canadian companies aiming to boost the trade relationship between the countries, told the ABC that the two countries have not yet discussed a joint response to U.S. tariffs.

    In a separate interview with Nine Entertainment newspapers, she said that Australia and Canada should continue to promote open and free trade under a system “that is underpinned by a rules-based order.”

    Ng met with Don Farrell, Australia’s minister for trade and tourism, over the weekend.

    Farrell on Thursday rejected a claim from Peter Navarro, Trump’s senior counselor for trade and manufacturing, that aluminum imported from Australia is “killing” the U.S. market. 

    MIL OSI China News –

    February 18, 2025
  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Two reports show privacy must be at the heart of trust in government

    Source: Privacy Commissioner

    18 Feb 2025, 15:15

    Today’s release of two reports into the protection of personal information show agencies must be better at privacy, says Privacy Commissioner Michael Webster.

    The Inquiry into how government agencies protected personal information for the 2023 Census and COVID-19 vaccination programme (the PSC Inquiry) and the Independent investigation and assurance review of allegations of misuse of 2023 Census information (the Stats NZ report), show the protection of personal information needs to be treated as a priority.

    Several matters have now been referred to the Office of the Privacy Commissioner (these are detailed below).

    Privacy Commissioner Michael Webster said he is carefully reviewing the referrals raised in the two reports. That work will be done in the context the Privacy Act and the need to ensure individuals’ rights to privacy is protected and respected.

    “New Zealanders need to be confident that when they do activities, like filling in their Census form, or giving over information for medical services, that their information is collected, used, and shared as the law outlines it should be,” says Mr Webster.

    “The Privacy Act is very clear that agencies collecting personal information need to keep it safe and treat it with care. This responsibility extends to the use of third-party service providers. 

    Agencies need to be confident that personal information is protected wherever and whatever organisation is handling it.”

    The Office of the Privacy Commissioner has recently issued guidance to help agencies working with third-party providers understand their responsibilities.

    Mr Webster said he was encouraged to see that work on a new information sharing standard is underway, supporting the information stewardship framework at the core of the Privacy Act.

    “Its important people can trust that their information is treated with care. In our 2024 Privacy Survey the percentage of people who said they are “more concerned” about privacy issues over the last few years has increased to 55%, a 14% increase from two years ago. New Zealanders were clear in their response to these concerns:

    • 80% want more control and choice over the collection and use of their personal information.
    • 63% said protecting their personal information is a major concern in their lives.
    • around two-thirds of New Zealanders are concerned about businesses or government organisations sharing their personal information without telling them.

    “Good privacy is an essential part of providing services and doing business in a digital economy. Today’s findings should be a reminder to government organisations that good privacy practices aren’t an optional extra but are fundamental to the work they do,” says the Commissioner.

    A number of questions have now been referred to the Privacy Commissioner by the PSC Inquiry:

    • Whether systems and controls were appropriate for personal data following its transmission by Te Whatu Ora, the Ministry of Health and Stats NZ to service providers
    • Whether there were appropriate means in place for these public agencies to be confident that their service providers were meeting their contractual privacy requirements
    • Whether personal information was collected or used by Manurewa Marae for unauthorised purposes
    • Whether separation of personal data from Census data was maintained at Manurewa Marae, and whether privacy statements were adequate to inform people about the use of their information.

    A further matter has been referred to the Privacy Commissioner by the Stats NZ report about the collection and management of personal information and confidential census data.

    While the review of the referrals takes place, the Office will not be making any further comment.

    MIL OSI New Zealand News –

    February 18, 2025
  • MIL-Evening Report: Australian houses are getting larger. For a more sustainable future, our houses can’t be the space for everything

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Bhavna Middha, ARC DECRA Senior Research Fellow, Centre for Urban Research, RMIT University

    The average Australian household size has decreased from 4.5 people per household in 1911 to 2.5 people in 2024. At the same time, the average house size has increased, from 100 square metres in the 1950s to 236m² in 2020. The average living space in Australian households is now 84m² per person.

    The way we live in our homes – our habits and daily routines – is also growing and changing with our housing, and the way we want to live can shape the size of our homes.

    For a more sustainable future, we need to embrace living in smaller spaces. This means not letting our houses be our primary space for every activity in our lives.

    Our homes and ‘space creep’

    Our houses first became bigger due to space creep, bringing more of the outdoors inside.

    Once, older children were delegated to “sleep outs”, or closed-in verandas, when new siblings arrived. Over time, these draughty and unheated spaces may have been converted into bedrooms, and houses were increasingly built with dedicated rooms for each child.

    Older children were often relegated to sleeping in enclosed verandas, like on this house in Cairns in 1927.
    State Library Queensland

    Our research shows space creep now also occurs even in shrinking, empty nest households. Garages and sheds are increasingly being converted into “man-caves” or rumpus rooms for tinkering, play and privacy.

    Some families we spoke with bought bigger houses because there was a separate “hobby room” for crafts or music, or separate home offices. People now see these spaces as integral to their home life, and buy or build houses with this in mind.

    Space creep is also linked to how we consume. We saw many old fridges and chest freezers in garages, allowing for greater food storage because people were concerned about having enough food in the house, needed to bulk buy items to save money, or because they tried to minimise trips to the store.

    The routines set in these spaces result in us consuming more space. As we, as a society, become used to these spaces, we feel like we should need them.

    COVID changed perceptions of how much space is needed in our homes. People living in apartments now describe them as feeling much smaller than they did before.

    Pets are increasingly viewed as part of the family: almost half of homes have a dog, and one third own a cat. This means either making or buying more space to accommodate pets, as well as more energy consumption.

    Studies have found we spend more time in our houses than in the past, but overall time spent in each space in the house is less. And while the spaciousness of our homes may afford privacy, we lose connection. If every family member is in a different room on their individual screens, we lose some of the benefits of a family room.

    Do we need more apartments?

    After children have left, many people prefer to age in their communities. Without better options of smaller, well-built homes in the same location, older people often hold onto the large family home.

    Planning rules and conventionally designed houses often do not offer the flexibility of subdividing homes that have grown too large. Smaller townhouses in the same area may be two stories with stairs, making them inaccessible for many older people. Older people need to be able to downsize without moving away from their communities, services and local area.

    And yet, it is not as simple or straightforward as everyone living in apartments or units. Some larger houses are still needed to satisfy certain needs, like multi-generational living.

    One in five Victorians want to live in apartments, but only one in ten do.
    Denise Jans/Unsplash

    A recent study found one in five Victorians would prefer to live in an apartment, but only one in ten do.

    In Australia, apartments suitable for families are rare. Students, young couples or young families see apartments as transient living places and not as a forever home, in stark contrast to how families see apartments in many cities in Europe.

    As our lot sizes decrease and our new houses increase in size, garden space is compromised to the detriment of biodiversity, shading from trees and stormwater runoff.

    Low and mid-density living that allows for smaller houses and units with backyards and apartments with generous balconies close to larger shared spaces, like parks and sports grounds, may satisfy the desire for privacy, serenity and improve physical and mental health through contact with nature, while reducing the risk of hotter urban environments.

    Changing priorities

    Transitioning from larger to smaller homes, and from houses to apartments, means shifting from a culture where we have an abundance of private spaces such as pools, home theatres and hobby rooms in our homes to shared social infrastructure.

    We need to see increased investment in social infrastructure – especially in greenfield suburbs with new developments.

    People might chose to have a bigger house so they can have a home gym, instead of a gym membership.
    Pixel-Shot/Shutterstock

    It means investing in walkable community facilities where people can go to pursue their interests and hobbies and connect with others. Instead of a private hobby room, these activities can be brought into a public space. Instead of multiple living areas, families can share one living space or use outside shared spaces such as Men’s Sheds.

    Changes to construction laws may help protect consumers and help householders gain confidence in the monetary value of multi-unit living, by providing solutions for issues in apartments such as cladding, safety and insurance.

    Another important step may be the New South Wales Housing Pattern Book. The book, to be released this year, will contain the winning designs of an international competition for terrace houses and mid-rise apartment buildings that offer compact sized dwellings with flexible room sizes, private and public outdoor spaces and ample natural light. The designs will be able to be licenced for use by developers and home builders, and enjoy faster approval processes.

    The availability of high-quality designs for smaller spaces in connection with attractive neighbourhood places may help Australians reimagine smaller, higher density, good home living.

    Bhavna Middha receives funding from the Australian Research Council for her Discovery Early Career Research Award (2024)

    Nicola Willand receives funding for research from various organisations, including the ARC, the Victorian state government, the Lord Mayor’s Charitable Foundation, the Future Fuels Collaborative Research Centre and the NHMRC. She is a trustee of the Fuel Poverty Research Network charity and affiliated with the Australian Institute of Architects.

    – ref. Australian houses are getting larger. For a more sustainable future, our houses can’t be the space for everything – https://theconversation.com/australian-houses-are-getting-larger-for-a-more-sustainable-future-our-houses-cant-be-the-space-for-everything-245476

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

    February 18, 2025
  • MIL-OSI China: Cross-border mechanism to fight crime

    Source: China State Council Information Office 2

    China and Myanmar have held talks on strengthening law enforcement and security cooperation, including establishing a regular mechanism to combat cross-border crimes such as online gambling and telecom fraud, according to a statement from the Chinese embassy in Myanmar.
    The Myanmar government said it is committed to cracking down on such crimes, the statement said. Chinese Ambassador to Myanmar Ma Jia and Chinese Assistant Minister of Public Security Liu Zhongyi met on Friday with Myanmar’s Deputy Prime Minister and Union Minister for Foreign Affairs U Than Swe and Union Minister for Home Affairs Lieutenant-General Tun Tun Naung.
    During the talks, the Myanmar officials outlined steps the government will take to combat online gambling and telecom fraud, and pledged to strengthen coordination with China and neighboring countries to promote bilateral and multilateral cooperation, the statement said.
    Chinese officials praised Myanmar’s commitment to protecting Chinese citizens, emphasizing that online gambling and telecom fraud pose serious threats to lives and property.
    According to Myanmar News Agency, discussions focused on efforts to crack down on online scams and gambling operations in Myawaddy, a known hub for scam networks on the Myanmar border with Thailand. The two sides also discussed measures to rescue and repatriate Chinese nationals and improve information-sharing regarding legal action and the expulsion of foreigners who enter Myanmar illegally.
    Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Guo Jiakun said at a regular news conference on Monday that China is working closely with Myanmar, Thailand and other countries to adopt comprehensive measures to tackle the root causes of online crime and prevent criminals from exploiting regional borders.
    “The recent surge in online gambling and telecom fraud in the Thailand-Myanmar border areas has endangered the lives and property of citizens in several countries, including China and Thailand, while disrupting normal exchanges and cooperation in the region,” Guo said.
    “Resolutely combating these crimes is necessary to protect the common interests of regional nations and reflects the shared aspirations of their people.”
    According to the Bangkok Post, Liu visited Mae Sot in Thailand, across from Myawaddy, on Sunday. Myanmar has transferred 261 victims rescued from the KK Park and Shwe Kokko scam hubs in Myawaddy to Thai authorities for repatriation.
    Liu previously visited Thailand two weeks ago, urging authorities there to take decisive action against scam networks in Myanmar, which he said pose a major threat to both China and Thailand.
    On Feb 5, Thailand cut electricity, internet services and fuel supplies to five areas of Myanmar, including Myawaddy, as part of its efforts to cripple the scam operations.

    MIL OSI China News –

    February 18, 2025
  • MIL-OSI China: Govt bodies seek deep integration with AI tech

    Source: China State Council Information Office 2

    Local governments in China are racing to embrace cutting-edge technologies, such as artificial intelligence and intelligent robots, to facilitate decision-making and industrial innovation, after Chinese AI startup DeepSeek recently sparked a new wave of global discussions on technology.
    The municipal government of Guangzhou, the capital of Guangdong province, recently deployed DeepSeek’s open-source model on its government extranet, a private network for sharing information with selected external users, thereby pioneering the application of the model in fields such as government administration, urban management and public services.
    Chen Geng, head of the infrastructure division at the Guangzhou Municipal Government Affairs Data Administration, said on Monday that the integration of the DeepSeek AI model can improve local residents’ access to policy information and boost the efficiency of document processing.
    Chen said the open-source ecosystem of DeepSeek lowers the threshold for AI applications, benefiting intelligent administrative operations in government institutions at the provincial, municipal and county levels.
    Guangzhou has upgraded its hotline services for handling complaints and suggestions from local residents by integrating with the DeepSeek AI model and other new technologies. This has reduced the average waiting time for calls from the public by 43 percent and increased the accuracy of directing the calls to 97 percent, according to the city government.
    In addition, the government of Hohhot, the capital of the Inner Mongolia autonomous region, has also completed the deployment of the DeepSeek-R1 model on its government extranet.
    Li Haigang, director of the service center of Hohhot’s big data management bureau, said on Monday, “We will promote the application of the DeepSeek model across various departments, starting with providing immediate response and intelligent Q&A for the complaint hotline, and gradually expanding to accommodate more departmental business scenarios.”
    Li added that the bureau plans to leverage advanced technologies such as big data and AI to analyze multimodal data, such as texts, images and videos, in order to support the aggregation and sharing of public data.
    As of Monday, at least eight cities in China had announced integration with the DeepSeek AI model to empower local government services.
    Moreover, some local governments have organized learning sessions to help officials and business professionals understand the development and application of DeepSeek and other AI technologies.
    On Saturday, officials of Zhengzhou, the capital of Henan province, participated in a collective learning session on DeepSeek, during which Shen Yang, a professor at Tsinghua University’s College of AI, provided insights into domestic and international AI models, the use of DeepSeek, and AI-generated content and applications in various industries, according to Zhengzhou Daily.
    An Wei, secretary of the Communist Party of China Zhengzhou committee, called for all officials in the city to master the use of AI models like DeepSeek, in order to fully leverage AI to assist in decision-making and improve work efficiency.
    He also emphasized the need to align with the demands of Zhengzhou’s industrial transformation, promoting the integration of AI technology with strategic emerging industries, advantageous traditional industries, and new business formats such as the use of short videos, livestreaming and cultural creativity.
    In the Jinpu New Area of Dalian, Liaoning province, a training session on applications of the DeepSeek AI model was held on Friday for more than 1,300 participants, including key government officials and representatives from over 500 enterprises, according to Li Yan, chief of the Jinpu New Area’s data bureau.
    She said on Monday that the bureau will use AI models to empower government services by continuously improving the efficiency of government work, facilitating the transformation and upgrading of emerging industries, reducing the costs and increasing the efficiency of enterprises, and driving the high-quality development of the new area.
    In addition to the application of the DeepSeek AI model in government services, the use of AI technology is also being encouraged in other fields, such as the new energy industry.
    In December, a three-year action plan for technological innovation in the new energy industry was jointly released by 11 departments in Shan­dong province. It aims to establish an intelligent power management platform integrated with AI, achieving large-scale application by 2027.
    According to People’s Daily Online, State Grid Shandong Electric Power Co has developed an AI-assisted intelligent power regulation model, achieving real-time control of various segments of the power industry chain.
    Besides AI, senior officials across the country are also focusing on other technologies in emerging and future industries.
    Guangdong Governor Wang Wei­zhong visited the high-tech hub of Shenzhen last week to inspect the development of intelligent robots, AI, autonomous driving and quantum technology, according to Guangdong TV.
    Wang emphasized the need to accelerate breakthroughs in key components such as machine brains, limbs and bodies, and to promote the innovative application of intelligent robots in scenarios such as elderly care and public services.

    MIL OSI China News –

    February 18, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: Trust Stamp Partners with Digital Platformer to Strengthen Security in Digital Identity and Financial Services

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Trust Stamp and Digital Platformer unite to establish a strategic partnership, delivering an integrated solution that combines Trust Stamp’s advanced identity verification capabilities with Digital Platformer’s cutting-edge decentralized security solutions 

    This joint initiative aims to enhance financial security, identity authentication, and regulatory compliance across multiple industries, ensuring a seamless and privacy-first user experience

    Tokyo, Japan, Feb. 17, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Trust Stamp (Nasdaq: IDAI), the Privacy-First Identity Company™, and Digital Platformer, a leader in decentralized solutions, have signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to collaborate on innovative technologies that enhance financial security, identity verification, and privacy protection, with the intention of the parties to enter into a definitive agreement for shared services.

    This planned strategic partnership introduces advanced solutions integrating biometric authentication with decentralized security frameworks, addressing key challenges such as cybersecurity threats, fraud prevention, and regulatory compliance, enhancing trust and efficiency across financial services, digital transactions, and data protection.

    As digital services evolve, organizations face increasingly sophisticated cybersecurity threats, growing concerns over data privacy, and the challenge of balancing security with usability. Traditional authentication methods—such as passwords and centralized credentials—remain vulnerable to breaches, while emerging alternatives like passkeys and device-based authentication can introduce risks related to device compromise, cloud syncing vulnerabilities, and unauthorized access. Additionally, fragmented identity verification processes create barriers to adoption, increasing operational friction and limiting growth opportunities.

    In response to these challenges, Trust Stamp and Digital Platformer aim to introduce a unified solution, leveraging advanced biometric authentication and decentralized technology to streamline onboarding, mitigate fraud risks, and ensure compliance across sectors like finance, healthcare, and government services. The combination of a privacy-first biometric identity verification together with secure authentication mechanisms, offers a forward-looking approach to identity authentication.

    Gareth Genner
    CEO, Trust Stamp
    “This partnership is built on a shared vision to redefine the standards of security and usability in the digital economy. By integrating our cutting-edge tokenized biometric authentication with Digital Platformers advanced solutions, we’re delivering a comprehensive and decentralized platform that not only enhances compliance, but also creates new opportunities for businesses navigating complex regulatory and technological environments.” 

    “The partnership leverages Secure Multiparty Computation (MPC) to securely manage biometric data and private keys in a decentralized manner, enabling rapid, secure, and privacy-focused authentication. By integrating Trust Stamp’s solutions with Digital Platformer’s advanced technology, businesses can enhance identity security and streamline digital services, enhance financial security, while ensuring seamless interoperability with existing platforms. This addresses the shortcomings of existing methods and ensures that only genuine users can access applications and accounts.”

    Ikkei Matsuda
    CEO, Digital Platformer
    “Our partnership with Trust Stamp marks a significant step toward redefining digital identity and financial security. At Digital Platformer, we leverage cutting-edge blockchain technology to establish trustless identity solutions that ensure authenticity, while adding trust to the secure ownership and transactions of digital assets. By integrating diverse services and advancing automated transactions, we foster autonomy in the flow of people, goods, and money, ultimately supporting the formation of a new economic ecosystem. Through this collaboration, we aim to provide a more secure and efficient authentication and transaction environment across industries such as finance, healthcare, and government, expanding the potential of decentralized technologies.”

    “‘Digital identity authentication is undergoing a significant transformation. As users embrace biometric verification, the shift toward more secure and advanced solutions is accelerating. This collaboration revolutionizes identity and asset management, empowering various industries with secure, efficient interactions that enhance user satisfaction, address cybersecurity risks, and simplify regulatory compliance—all without compromising privacy. Trust Stamp and Digital Platformer are paving the way for a safer, more inclusive digital economy.” 

    Ajmir Safi
    Vice President, Trust Stamp Japan
    “As the digital landscape continues to evolve, security and privacy are more important than ever. Our partnership with Digital Platformer supports the growing need for stronger cybersecurity, regulatory compliance, and seamless user experiences. This collaboration sets a new benchmark, and marks a significant step toward providing businesses and consumers with secure, efficient, and future-proof authentication solutions that protect against cyber threats while ensuring ease of use”

    Enquiries

    Trust Stamp                                                             Email: Asafi@truststamp.ai 
    Ajmir Safi

    Digital Platformer                                                   Email: contact@digitalplatformer.co.jp 
    Maki Tateno

    About Trust Stamp
    Trust Stamp the Privacy-First Identity CompanyTM, is a global provider of AI-powered identity services for use in multiple sectors, including banking and finance, regulatory compliance, government, real estate, communications, and humanitarian services. Its technology empowers organizations with advanced biometric identity solutions that reduce fraud, protect personal data privacy, increase operational efficiency, and reach a broader base of users worldwide through its unique data transformation and comparison capabilities.
    Located in nine countries across North America, Europe, Asia, and Africa, Trust Stamp trades on the Nasdaq Capital Market (Nasdaq: IDAI). The company was founded in 2016 by Gareth Genner and Andrew Gowasack.

    About Digital Platformer
    Digital Platformer, founded in Tokyo in 2020, leverages one of Japan’s most advanced blockchain technologies to provide trustless identity (ID) solutions that ensure authenticity and add trust to the secure ownership and transactions of digital assets. By integrating diverse services and automating transactions, Digital Platformer fosters autonomy in the flow of people, goods, and money, supporting the formation of a new economic ecosystem.

    Safe Harbor Statement: Caution Concerning Forward-Looking Remarks
    All statements in this release that are not based on historical fact are “forward-looking statements” including within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and the provisions of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The information in this announcement may contain forward-looking statements and information related to, among other things, the company, its business plan and strategy, and its industry. These statements reflect management’s current views with respect to future events-based information currently available and are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause the company’s actual results to differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking statements. Investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date on which they are made. The company does not undertake any obligation to revise or update these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after such date or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

    The MIL Network –

    February 18, 2025
  • MIL-Evening Report: Fish and chips shouldn’t come with a catch: how Australia can keep illegal seafood off our plates

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Leslie Roberson, Postdoctoral research fellow, Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, The University of Queensland

    If you’ve ever been stopped by quarantine officers at the airport, you might think Australia’s international border is locked down like a fortress. But when it comes to trade in seafood, it’s more like a net full of holes.

    Products sourced from illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing can easily slip through to unsuspecting buyers.

    Seafood is among the world’s most traded agricultural commodities. Yet illegal fishing accounts for an estimated one-fifth of all wild-caught seafood.

    This represents a serious threat to marine ecosystems, food security and even human rights. The phenomenon has been linked to organised crime, modern slavery, and the depletion of vulnerable species such as abalone and hammerhead sharks.

    The blame usually falls on countries where the fishing occurs, or where the boat is registered. But seafood markets, including processors, retailers and consumers, play a major role in driving demand. They could also play a crucial role in combating illegal fishing.

    In our new policy paper, we propose more effective controls on seafood imports.

    What is illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing? (Australian Fisheries Management Authority)

    Australia’s role as a seafood-loving nation

    Australia spends considerable effort managing its own fisheries, ensuring they are legal and sustainable.

    Yet, 60 to 70% of the seafood consumed in Australia is imported.

    These imports come mainly from countries with weaker environmental regulations, more illegal activity, and greater vulnerability to labour abuse and slavery.

    Current policies leave Australia vulnerable to illegally sourced seafood. Key information, such as the fishing location or species name, is often not required under current trade measures. This means seafood products can be imported under vague labels such as “frozen fish”, obscuring their identity and origins.

    Suspect seafood products

    Certain seafood products such as shark fins are more likely to be sourced illegally for a variety of reasons, including high market value. Other riskier wild-caught products imported into Australia include:

    • shark meat (“flake”): high chance of being illegally caught and most commonly mislabelled
    • tuna: a high-value product that could be illegally caught
    • squid: most of Australia’s imported squid is caught by Chinese fleets, which are under fire for illegal fishing and labour abuses.
    Most of the seafood consumed in Australia comes from overseas.
    Shine Nucha, Shutterstock

    A new border policy could help crack down on fishy imports

    Australia has made international commitments to consume sustainable seafood, in fisheries policy and through subscribing to the United Nations 2030 Sustainable Development Goals and the Global Biodiversity Framework. Meeting these commitments will require being more careful about what we import from other countries. This could take the form of stricter border regulations.

    The Australian government has begun to explore trade measures aimed at denying entry to illegal or untraceable seafood products. A group of organisations was formed two years ago to support this process. While a draft report was released at the end of 2023, the final outcome remains delayed – perhaps until after the next federal election.

    To inform this process, we reviewed the existing seafood import policies and recommend eight key design criteria for improvement.

    Only the United States, the European Union, and Japan have systems in place to verify the legal origin of imported seafood. Since these are some of the world’s largest seafood import markets, their efforts are important. But their schemes all have notable flaws that Australia should avoid replicating.

    These systems are technologically obsolete, lack solid traceability and accounting mechanisms, and rely on trade documents that are often impossible to verify. Most systems are not fully electronic, resulting in shipping containers of seafood arriving with shoeboxes of paper catch certificates.

    There are no mechanisms for cooperation between countries. Crosschecking of the same certificate arriving in both France and Italy, for instance, is not yet possible. This makes it easy to reuse certificates across multiple countries, enabling trade of falsely labelled or illegally caught seafood.

    Unlawful transfer of fish between vessels is an example of illegal fishing activity.
    Richard Whitcombe, Shutterstock

    Australia’s chance to take the lead against fishy imports

    Seafood supply chains are notoriously complex. Without effective certification schemes, keeping seafood sourced from illegal fishing operations out of our market is virtually impossible.

    Although Australia’s seafood appetite is minuscule compared to the US, the EU, or Japan, it has the resources and the opportunity to create a better import control system. Such a system would involve designing an electronic platform with automated fraud detection mechanisms that tracks seafood products from the fishing boat, through the supply chain, to the Australian border. Australia can then start to close the sizeable loophole in its efforts to secure a legal and traceable seafood supply.

    Such policies would support sustainable Australian fisheries and help the country’s biggest seafood suppliers to source responsibly. Nearly every country in the world trades seafood: if countries implement smart import policies, illegally sourced seafood will become much easier to intercept.

    The authors appreciate the valuable contributions of Gilles Hosch, a fisheries expert with 25 years of experience in global fisheries compliance and seafood traceability.

    Leslie Roberson receives funding from the Australian Research Council.

    Carissa Klein receives funding from the Australian Research Council.

    Rosa Mar Dominguez-Martinez receives funding from the Australian Research Council.

    – ref. Fish and chips shouldn’t come with a catch: how Australia can keep illegal seafood off our plates – https://theconversation.com/fish-and-chips-shouldnt-come-with-a-catch-how-australia-can-keep-illegal-seafood-off-our-plates-249481

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

    February 18, 2025
  • MIL-Evening Report: YouTube hosts a lot of garbage – but the government is right to let kids keep watching it

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Catherine Page Jeffery, Lecturer in Media and Communications, University of Sydney

    suriyachan/Shutterstock

    When the Australian government passed legislation in November last year banning young people under 16 from social media, it included exemptions for platforms “that are primarily for the purposes of education and health support”. One such platform was YouTube.

    The government is currently conducting private consultations with the tech industry over how the social media ban – which won’t come into effect until at least December this year – will work, and the decision to exempt YouTube.

    Meta and TikTok have criticised the exemption. These tech giants have pointed to research which shows YouTube is the most popular social media platform among young people. They argue all social media sites used by under 16s should be held to the same standard.

    YouTube plays an important part in the digital lives of teens. It is a key source of information and entertainment for young people. At the same time, however, the video streaming platform hosts a diverse range of potentially harmful content, including content espousing misogynistic, racist, hateful and far-right ideologies.

    So is YouTube’s exemption from the social media ban justified?

    A multipurpose platform

    For many teens, YouTube is a major source of information. It offers not only entertainment, but also a sense of community.

    Young people use it to listen to and search for music and for watching television content; to keep up with news; to create their own content; for social connection; and to learn about new topics.

    YouTube has also been found to create a sense of community and boost the collective self-esteem of the LGBTQ community.

    Many organisations – such as mental health and sexual health organisations – seek to deliver important health information to young people through YouTube.

    In my research with families, parents and teens have told me YouTube is an invaluable source of information for both parents and teens. It can facilitate family bonding through co-viewing of either educational or entertaining videos.

    YouTube occupies an important place in the lives of young people. So banning them from it would cut off an important source of information, education, entertainment and connection.

    For many teens, YouTube is a major source of information. It offers not only entertainment, but also a sense of community.
    PixieMe/Shutterstock

    Recommending harmful content

    However, we also know that YouTube – like other social media sites and the internet more broadly – also contains potentially harmful content that the platform may recommend to young users.

    The algorithmic systems that recommend new videos to viewers can be difficult to study due to their opaque nature as commercially valuable IP carefully guarded by platforms.

    But from the studies that do exist, we know YouTube’s recommendation system has served content that is sexually explicit and otherwise distressing to young users.

    A recent report by Reset Tech also found YouTube’s algorithms may promote misogynistic and other extremist content to young people.

    A different design

    YouTube has in place a range of content moderation policies designed to combat these issues. For example, it takes action to prioritise in its recommendations sources from channels it deems reliable and unlikely to contain harmful content, with mixed results.

    Content that might harm young people is explicitly banned under the platform’s community guidelines.

    Of course, most social media platforms have similar restrictions in their guidelines.

    A key difference between YouTube and other social media platforms, however, is the way YouTube is designed to be used.

    Unlike Facebook, Instagram and Snapchat, YouTube is not designed to be a social network. Users can and most commonly do go to the platform to passively watch videos, just as they might go to Disney+ or Netflix.

    The social media ban will apply to platforms such as Facebook, X and TikTok.
    Danishch/Shutterstock

    Striking the right balance

    The most alarming research into the impact of social media on young people suggests they are at the highest risk of harm when they are encouraged to actively rather than passively participate on social media platforms.

    Exempting YouTube from the ban strikes the right balance between recognising and valuing forms of cultural practice and consumption important to young people today and protecting them from online harm.

    But we should still continue to demand better practices from YouTube. There is always more these social media companies can do to protect their users from harm. When they fail to do so, they should be held accountable.

    While exempting YouTube from this ban, they should still be held to the highest safety standards under Australia’s Online Safety Act.

    The exemption also does not mean young people should be able to freely engage with YouTube without restriction or oversight.

    We must talk to our kids about what they watch, teach them critical thinking skills and ensure they have rich lives outside of the digital realm.

    One tangible step parents can take to reduce the risk of harm is to turn off the autoplay setting on YouTube for their kids, so videos do not stream back to back, stopping the endless flow of videos and providing an opportunity for viewers to consider what and whether they want to watch another video.

    Catherine Page Jeffery receives funding from the Australian Research Council. She is affiliated with Children and Media Australia.

    Joanne Gray currently receives funding from the Australian Research Council and has previously received funding for research from companies such as Meta Platforms and ByteDance.

    – ref. YouTube hosts a lot of garbage – but the government is right to let kids keep watching it – https://theconversation.com/youtube-hosts-a-lot-of-garbage-but-the-government-is-right-to-let-kids-keep-watching-it-250050

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

    February 18, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Submissions: Pacific – Vanuatu’s earthquake won’t stop children learning – UNICEF

    Source: UNICEF Aotearoa NZ

    UNICEF supports Vanuatu’s recovery plan as thousands of children start a new school year
    Port Vila, Vanuatu, 17 February 2025 – Two months on since the 7.3 magnitude earthquake struck Vanuatu, more than 12,000 children from affected schools are able to continue their learning during this new school year. The earthquake caused widespread damage to lives, homes, schools, and health care facilities.
    UNICEF is supporting government efforts to ensure that all children have as smooth a transition as possible back into learning, providing temporary learning spaces and materials to help children readjust. It is vital that children regain a sense of normalcy and connection, to protect them from the harmful effects of prolonged stress.
    According to the Vanuatu Ministry of Education and Training, 45 schools have been affected, with 107 classrooms sustaining varying levels of damage. 20 Early Childhood Care and Education centres were also affected. As a result, there are far too few safe classrooms for the numbers of children returning to school.
    Children must be able to learn, despite these challenges, so UNICEF and partners have provided more than 50 safe temporary learning spaces for 5,839 girls and boys. Learning materials, School-in-a-Box and Early Childhood Development kits for 2,300 children and teachers have also been provided. These learning spaces will not only provide a conducive learning environment but also serve as entry points for other essential services for children’s recovery including mental health and psychosocial support.
    Through the deployment of a child psychologist, teachers and other frontline workers are being trained to run psychosocial support activities with children. The activities are designed to help children express their feelings, and to help adults identify signs of distress, to provide counselling, and to make referrals to specialized mental health services where required.
    UNICEF is also supporting access to safe water, sanitation, and hygiene practices to provide school children and teachers with a safe and supportive environment for learning. This includes quick fixes; restoring water, sanitation, and hygiene services; and the provision of WASH in school kits, which include soap and portable handwashing stations, to the affected schools. This is complemented with hygiene education materials and training to strengthen the operation and maintenance of WASH infrastructure.
    “Every child deserves to have the opportunity to learn, especially with these challenges,” said UNICEF Pacific’s Chief of Vanuatu Field Office, Eric Durpaire. “We are working with teachers and communities to enable a safe return to school for all children, under the leadership of the Ministry.”
    In the coming months, UNICEF’s recovery plan includes the rehabilitation of the classrooms that will allow children to shift from temporary learning spaces to semi-permanent or permanent structures. The plan must ensure the long-term maintenance and teacher and community resilience.
    UNICEF is working closely with the government, communities, and partners to integrate disaster-resilient designs as well as climate-adaptive measures into reconstruction efforts to reduce vulnerabilities. This includes support across essential aspects of a child’s optimal development – nutrition, health, safe water, learning opportunities and a safe and protected environment.
    Emergency response and recovery after a disaster such as this cannot be achieved alone. UNICEF acknowledges the support provided by donors including the Government of Australia, the Government of the United Kingdom as well as the United Nation’s Central Emergency Response Fund (CERF), while acknowledging the Government of Vanuatu in ensuring that children can pack their bags for a new school year.

    MIL OSI – Submitted News –

    February 18, 2025
  • MIL-OSI China: China’s Xizang reports surging foreign trade in 2024

    Source: China State Council Information Office

    Foreign trade in southwest China’s Xizang Autonomous Region climbed to 12.67 billion yuan (about 1.77 billion U.S. dollars) in 2024, marking a 15.4 percent increase from the previous year, Lhasa Customs officials said Monday.

    Exports rose 15.3 percent year on year to 11.32 billion yuan, while imports increased 16.9 percent to 1.35 billion yuan, according to the data.

    Xizang has expanded its trade ties to 140 countries and regions. Nepal became its largest trading partner last year, with bilateral trade soaring 84.8 percent to 5.12 billion yuan.

    Private enterprises played a dominant role, contributing 98.6 percent of the region’s total foreign trade, it said.

    Local officials attributed the trade growth to increased exports of specialty products, rising demand for new energy products, improved border trade, and enhanced customs clearance processes.

    Exports of plateau specialty goods such as wool and cashmere surpassed 100 million yuan for the first time in 2024, up more than 20 percent year on year.

    “Our company specializes in wool processing, with products mainly exported to Nepal, the United States and European countries where they are well received,” said Lhapa Trinley, head of a local trading company. “This year, foreign trade orders have increased, and our customer base is expanding.”

    The renewable energy sector also emerged as a key driver, with demand for new energy vehicles (NEVs), lithium batteries, and solar products rising in South Asia. Xizang exported more than 11,800 NEVs worth 1.55 billion yuan in 2024, up 144.82 percent and 126.79 percent year on year respectively.

    “China’s NEVs, with their strengths in electrification and intelligence, are gaining popularity in Nepal,” said Sun Yong, general manager of Xizang Xudatong Trade Co., Ltd.

    As Xizang deepens its opening-up efforts, border trade is picking up. In 2024, 14 traditional border trade points resumed operations, with small-scale border trade reaching 3.53 billion yuan.

    “The rapid growth of foreign trade would not be possible without policy support and trade facilitation,” said Chungda, an official at Lhasa Customs. “We have continuously optimized the business environment at ports and improved customs clearance efficiency, and plan to introduce new clearance models to further enhance logistics and trade facilitation.”

    Xizang’s gross domestic product expanded by 6.3 percent in 2024, and this year the region has set a growth target of over 7 percent, striving to reach 8 percent, according to its government work report.

    The year 2025 marks the 60th founding anniversary of the Xizang Autonomous Region. 

    MIL OSI China News –

    February 18, 2025
  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Government Cuts – Telehealth staff cuts would reduce access to virtual healthcare – PSA

    Source: PSA

    While Health Minister Simeon Brown pushes for more Telehealth services, Health New Zealand (HNZ) is proposing to cut key Telehealth support roles to meet the Government’s drive to reduce health spending.
    These proposed cuts would reduce access to virtual healthcare, increasing wait times and delaying vital diagnosis and treatment, Public Service Association Te Pūkenga Here Tikanga Mahi Acting National Secretary Fleur Fitzsimons says.
    Under HNZ’s proposed restructures of the Data and Digital, and Planning, Funding and Outcomes teams there would be a loss of 14 Telehealth roles.
    The proposed cuts would see only two full time Telehealth data and digital roles, and one Planning, Funding and Outcomes (PFO) role remain, reduced from 17 Telehealth support roles (including vacant roles). Roles proposed to be cut include Telehealth co-ordinators and Telehealth facilitators.
    Telehealth Data and Digital staff provide critical technical support to clinicians delivering healthcare services virtually, Fitzsimons says.
    “These cuts will mean clinical staff delivering virtual patient care will not be able to access the support they need to deliver that care in future,” Fitzsimons says.
    Removing this number of Telehealth roles will result in significant loss of access, availability and quality of healthcare for our communities, she says.
    “Axing vital Telehealth support roles makes a nonsense of the Government’s claims that their cuts to health won’t affect the care New Zealanders receive,” Fitzsimons says.
    The proposed cuts are part of the overall 47% cut to Data and Digital health services under the HNZ restructure proposal announced in late November, following a directive from the government to cut health spending.
    The PSA understands some Telehealth workers have already left the team via voluntary redundancy or not having their contracts renewed.
    “There is a risk that Telehealth workers will head offshore, and they would be hard to replace,” Fitzsimons says.
    “In January and February new Health Minister Simeon Brown strongly signalled he would be looking for increased use of virtual health care in the future. At the same time the Government is driving spending cuts that will see vital Telehealth technical support severely eroded.
    “Cutting Telehealth is not going to help the Minister Simeon Brown’s intention to embrace technology and open new ways for patients to access healthcare. These cuts pull the plug on this.
    “It’s further evidence that the Government’s funding cuts are rushed, disorganised and ill thought out.”
    Telehealth enables patients to connect with healthcare providers for a range of reasons, including new mums accessing lactation experts, diabetics receiving help with insulin self-management and support for women who were survivors of the pelvic mesh medical scandal.
    Some communities who may be impacted the most by these cuts include the nearly 25% of New Zealanders with disabilities, and those in rural communities, who may struggle to physically access healthcare.
    “The geography of New Zealand coupled with a spread-out population present certain challenges for accessing healthcare services. Virtual healthcare will undoubtedly be part of the solution, but this requires funding and resourcing to meet the need,” Fitzsimons says.

    MIL OSI New Zealand News –

    February 18, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: BitMart Research Releases In-Depth Analysis on World Liberty Financial (WLFI) and Its Strategic Vision

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Victoria. Mahe, Seychelles, Feb. 17, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — BitMart Research, the research arm of BitMart Exchange, has released an extensive report on World Liberty Financial (WLFI), a DeFi initiative backed by members of the Trump family. This report provides a comprehensive analysis of WLFI’s financial strategy, political influence, and long-term investment potential, making it a must-read for investors, policymakers, and cryptocurrency enthusiasts.

    World Liberty Financial (WLFI) 

    I. Project Background

    1. Project Introduction

    WLFI is a DeFi project supported by the Trump family, the President of the United States, and officially launched in September 2022. Its core objective is to promote the widespread adoption of stablecoins, strengthen the dominance of the US dollar in the global financial system, and utilize cryptocurrency technology to fulfill the vision of “Make America Great Again.” WLFI is positioned as a DeFi lending platform, initially operating on the Ethereum network. It leverages mature DeFi protocols (such as Aave v3) to optimize user experience rather than launching entirely new financial tools. 

    On December 13, 2024, the World Liberty Financial community approved its first proposal and successfully deployed an instance of Aave v3. Although WLFI has made initial progress, many of its team co-founders are newcomers, and its long-term feasibility and innovation potential remain to be verified.

    On February 12, 2025, WLFI announced the launch of “Macro Strategy,” aimed at establishing strategic token reserves to support leading cryptocurrency projects such as Bitcoin and Ethereum. This strategy will help WLFI enhance stability, promote growth, and build trust, while collaborating with traditional financial institutions to advance tokenization of assets. WLFI is working with several financial institutions to incorporate their tokenized assets into reserves and provide transparency through public blockchain wallets. Additionally, WLFI will collaborate with partner institutions to conduct marketing and brand promotion activities, showcasing its leadership in financial innovation.

    2. Team Information

    Trump Family Roles

    • Donald J. Trump: Listed as the “Chief Cryptocurrency Advocate,” responsible for promoting the project but not deeply involved in technology or operations.
    • Eric Trump & Donald Trump Jr. & Barron Trump: Serve as “Web3 Ambassadors,” mainly responsible for promoting and publicizing the project.

    Core Co-Founders

    • Chase Herro and Zak Folkman: Both co-lead operations but have controversial backgrounds due to a lack of experience in the crypto industry. Chase Herro has been involved in cannabis sales and promoting controversial tokens; Zak Folkman founded a male dating coaching company.

    Witkoff Family

    • Real estate developer Steven Witkoff and his sons Zach and Alex are closely related to the Trump family. Steven donated $2 million to Trump’s campaign. After Trump’s victory, he was appointed as the Middle East envoy.

    Core Technical Personnel

    • Rich Teo: Head of stablecoins and payments, previously founded the exchange itBit and stablecoin company Paxos, currently serves as CEO of Paxos Asia. Rich is also an advisor for the SocialFi project RepubliK.
    • Corey Caplan: Head of technical strategy, co-founder of the DeFi platform Dolomite, responsible for integrating lending and trading functions.
    • Bogdan Purnavel: Chief Developer, previously worked on Dough Finance.

    Advisory Team

    • Alexei Dulub: Founder of Web3 Antivirus, blockchain security expert, participated in L1/L2 development since 2013.
    • Sandy Peng: Co-founder of Ethereum Layer 2 network Scroll, provides scaling technology support.
    • Justin Sun : As a strategic advisor and largest investor (invested $75 million), promotes ecological cooperation with TRON.

    Source: WLFI official website

    II. Funding Sources and Token Utilization
    WLFI’s funding comes from token sales, raising a total of $455 million as of February 9 (Source: WLFI official website). Of this, the first public sale of 21.3 billion tokens was sold out at $0.015 per token, raising $319 million. In the second public sale, the price was increased to $0.05 per token, raising $136 million by February 7. Currently, WLFI’s total value of purchased crypto assets is estimated at approximately $325.8 million, including important projects like ETH, WBTC, DeFi, and RWA. However, it should be noted that this project does not operate like a fund raising money through WLFI tokens to purchase mainstream project tokens with growth potential; WLFI token holders do not have rights to distribute investment returns. Although WLFI defines itself as a DeFi lending platform, it has not yet begun operations or provided DeFi services, so WLFI tokens currently have no value or usage path

    .

    III. Total Holdings

    As of February 9, 2025, WLFI’s total asset value is estimated at approximately $327million, with on-chain assets valued at around $37.79 million and centralized exchange assets valued at approximately $289 million (if unsold, deposited into Coinbase Prime for fund management and business operations).

    WLFI On-chain Assets (Data Source: ARKM)

    WLFI CoinbasePrime Assets (Data Source: SpotonChain)

    IV. Holding Structure Analysis

    As a crypto project strongly associated with the Trump family, WLFI’s asset allocation strategy has attracted market attention and spawned the concept of “presidential picks.” As of February 2025, ETH occupies a core position in WLFI’s crypto holdings (62.3%), followed by WBTC (16.4%), with remaining funds allocated to DeFi and RWA tracks. Notably, despite the decline in ETH/BTC exchange rates since December 2024, WLFI chose to increase its ETH holdings, highlighting its bet on the underlying infrastructure value of the Ethereum ecosystem. In terms of track selection, WLFI focuses on leading projects: Chainlink (LINK) and Aave (AAVE) in the DeFi field; Ondo Finance (ONDO) and Ethena (ENA) in the RWA track, forming a combination of “established protocols + emerging protocols.” 

    In terms of external cooperation, WLFI has formed a deep connection with Sun Yuchen, founder of TRON. The latter has invested $75 million through an HTX address and become the largest institutional investor. This also explains WLFI’s holdings of TRX and WBTC.

    Regarding fund management, WLFI recently transferred $307.4 million in assets to Coinbase Prime for custody and released 194 thousand stETH for liquidity management. Currently, the project still holds $47.49 million in stablecoin reserves. Future investments may focus on three main directions: (1) supplementing core asset holdings; (2) laying out emerging RWA protocols; (3) covering ecological cooperation costs.

    Detailed Holdings Breakdown:

    1. Ethereum (ETH)
    • ETH:78,610 tokens ($209 million, 63.8%)
    1. DeFi
    • AAVE: 16,585 tokens ($4.091 million, 1.3%)
    • LINK: 219,000 tokens ($4.117 million, 1.3%)
    1. RWA
    • ENA: 4.941 million tokens ($2.47 million, 0.8%)
    • ONDO: 456,000 tokens ($612,000, 0.001%)
    1. Justin Sun-related Assets
    • WBTC: 553 tokens ($53.648 million, 16.4%)
    • TRX: 40.71 million tokens ($9.772 million, 3%)
    1. Other Assets
    • USDC: 37.54million tokens ($37.54 million, 11.5%)
    • USDT: 4.14 million tokens ($4.14 million, 1.3%)
    • MOVE: 3.68 million tokens ($1.98 million, 0.3%)

    Analysis of WLFI Project Logic: Political Empowerment and Financial Ambition

    1.Financialization of Political Resources: A Fundraising Tool for the Trump Family

    From the token economic model of WLFI, it is evident that up to 75% of sales revenue directly belongs to the Trump family. Meanwhile, the project’s legal structure deliberately avoids direct association with Donald Trump himself, but strengthens its political binding attributes through public endorsements by family members (such as Eric Trump). This design essentially transforms Trump’s political influence into quantifiable financial assets, making it a political fundraising tool rather than a true decentralized financial product. The market generally views WLFI as a “bet on the prospects of Trump’s support for cryptocurrency policies.” Previously, investors purchasing this token were essentially indirectly supporting Trump’s campaign activities. This model is similar to Trump’s previous Trump MEME token, both serving as alternative financing channels beyond traditional political donations.

    2.Market Sentiment Manipulation: Dual Operation of Capital and Narrative

    The project can leverage Trump’s political influence to create market sentiment for itself and related projects. For example, after receiving investment from Sun Yuchen, WLFI made significant purchases of TRX and WBTC, with the current holding value at approximately $63.41 million. As of February 9, Sun Yuchen had invested a total of $75 million, with 84.5% of the funds used to purchase tokens related to his investments. Additionally, recently WLFI co-founder Chase Herro announced plans to establish a “strategic reserve” using tokens purchased by WLFI. Although he did not specify the goals or reasons for establishing the token reserve, this topic has been highly regarded since Trump committed during his last presidential campaign to establish a token reserve. Last month, Trump signed an executive order to assess the feasibility of creating a digital asset reserve. Against this backdrop, WLFI’s plan to establish a strategic reserve will undoubtedly strengthen market expectations around the concept of “presidential selection.” By deeply binding WLFI with Trump’s cryptocurrency policies, it can not only create market expectations and attract more capital inflows but also potentially facilitate off-market cooperation between the project party and political capital, thereby further expanding its market influence.

    About BitMart

    BitMart is the premier global digital asset trading platform. With millions of users worldwide and ranked among the top crypto exchanges on CoinGecko, it currently offers 1,700+ trading pairs with competitive trading fees. Constantly evolving and growing, BitMart is interested in crypto’s potential to drive innovation and promote financial inclusion. To learn more about BitMart, visit their Website, follow their X (Twitter), or join theirTelegram for updates, news, and promotions. Download BitMart App to trade anytime, anywhere. 

    Risk Warning

    Note: All cryptocurrency investments, including yield products, are highly speculative and involve significant risks. Past performance of products cannot guarantee future results. Cryptocurrency markets are highly volatile, and before making any investment decisions, you should carefully assess whether it is suitable for trading or holding digital currencies based on your investment objectives, financial situation, and risk tolerance, and consult a professional financial advisor. The information in this article is for reference only and does not constitute any investment, legal, or tax advice. The author and publisher do not assume responsibility for any losses incurred due to the use of this information.

    The MIL Network –

    February 18, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Europe: Record Employment Levels in Companies Supported by EI, IDA & Údarás na Gaeltachta reflect strength and resilience

    Source: Government of Ireland – Department of Jobs Enterprise and Innovation

    18th February 2025

    Over 546,763 jobs in client companies of Government agencies in 2024, an increase of 7,030 jobs on 2023 

    The Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment Peter Burke has today (18.02.2025) published two surveys on the Irish economy, which reflect the continued strength and resilience of industry in Ireland in the face of the challenges posed by global economic and political headwinds.

    The Annual Employment Survey 2024 finds that jobs in client companies of Enterprise Ireland, the IDA and Údarás na Gaeltachta, are now at their highest ever level, at over 546,763 jobs, which is a 1.3% increase on 2023 figures. 

    The Annual Business Survey of Economic Impact 2023 shows strong growth in sales, exports, value added and direct expenditures in the Irish economy for both Irish and foreign-owned companies in 2023.  

    The Minister said:

    “These results demonstrate the strength and resilience of our jobs market and industry in Ireland, in spite of the challenges posed by global economic and political headwinds. 

    “In 2024, employment growth in Irish owned firms was strong across the board, including in the Construction, Business Services and Food & Drink sectors. Total permanent, full-time jobs among Irish-owned companies has increased by another 2.3% this year, with Irish-owned companies growing in employment in every year over the past decade.  

    “Among Foreign owned firms, employment growth in Chemicals, Business Services and Medical Devices sectors has meant that we have maintained 300,000 roles across FDI, with 2,237 additional roles added this year. Sales and exports continue to grow strongly, and these companies purchase goods and services in the local economy.  

    “Government enterprise policy is working and making a significant impact on employment levels and wider society. My Department will maintain a laser focus on jobs, actively supporting and incentivising Irish businesses, while also investing in bringing new jobs to Ireland”

    Annual Employment Survey 2024 Key Findings: 

    • Employment in FDI firms increased by 0.3% since 2023, with 1,064 additional total jobs.  
    • In Irish-owned firms, employment increased by 2.7%, an increase of 5,966 total jobs since 2023. 
    • Among Irish owned firms the Energy, Water, Waste Construction sector gained the most jobs followed by Business Services with +1,444 and +995 full time jobs respectively. 
    • Among foreign owned firms Chemicals and Business Services gained the most jobs with +1,307 and +879 full time jobs respectively. 
    • Growth in employment between 2015-2024 was strongest in the Dublin region with an increase of 69.4% (+82,129), followed by the South-West (up 44.5%, +24,233 full time jobs). All regions grew employment over the ten-year period. 

    Annual Business Survey of Economic Impact (2023) Key Findings: 

    • Total sales amounted to €509.7 billion in 2023 which represents an increase of 6.8% in current prices on the previous year’s figure of €477.2 billion. 
    • Total exports in 2023 amounted to €459.4 billion, an increase of 7.0% on the previous year of €429.4 billion, with 92.4% of these exports being from foreign-owned enterprises.   
    • Value added (sales less materials and services costs) has also increased over this time-series and in 2023 amounted to €206.2 billion, up 6.4% on the previous year with 43.5% of this increase attributable to the foreign owned IT services sector.  
    • Direct Expenditure in the Irish Economy (Payroll, Irish Materials, Irish Services) has increased over 2022 by 4.8% to €78.5 billion in 2023. The level of direct expenditure in the Irish economy by foreign-owned client companies was €40.9 billion and €37.5 billion for Irish-owned client companies.  

    The Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment co-ordinates these surveys of the client companies of the enterprise development agencies (Enterprise Ireland, IDA Ireland and Údarás na Gaeltachta). The results are presented by company ownership in terms of Irish and foreign-owned firms. 

    The indicators collected include annual sales and exports and payroll, materials and services costs. Data collected in 2023 and 2024 is merged with results of previous surveys to provide trend data and indicators are available by ownership and sector and are used by the agencies in their annual reports and end-of-year statements. 

    Agencies have commenced surveys of client companies for the 2024 Annual Business Survey of Economic Impact with all results expected early 2026. 

    ENDS

    Back to Department News

    Back to Top

    MIL OSI Europe News –

    February 18, 2025
  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Gaza – Less than seven percent of pre-conflict water levels available to Rafah and North Gaza, worsening a health catastrophe – Oxfam

    Source: Oxfam Aotearoa

    – Nearly 1,700 kilometres of water and sanitation networks have been destroyed
    – Big-ticket repairs of networks urgently needed but Israeli government balks in approving supplies
    The resumption of aid into Gaza, including fuel to operate undamaged water and sanitation facilities along with water trucking, has improved the amount of water available to people in some parts of Gaza. But the picture remains extremely bleak and dangerously critical, especially in the North Gaza and Rafah governorates, warned Oxfam today.
    Fifteen months of Israel’s military assault has destroyed 1,675 kilometres of water and sanitation networks. In North Gaza and Rafah governorates, which have suffered the most destruction, less than seven percent of pre-conflict water levels is available to people, heightening the spread of waterborne diseases.
    As fragile ceasefire negotiations hang in the balance, any renewed violence or disruption to fuel and the already inadequate aid would trigger a full-scale public health disaster.
    Carlos Calderon, Oxfam Aotearoa’s Head of Partnerships and Humanitarian said:
    “No human can survive more than a few days without water. In Gaza, over two million people are being forced to drink from unsafe sources, while overflowing sewage networks create a breeding ground for deadly diseases we once conquered. This is a second humanitarian catastrophe in the making. What we do next will define who we are as a society.”
    Clémence Lagouardat, Oxfam’s Humanitarian Coordinator in Gaza said:
    “Now that the bombs have stopped, we have only just begun to grasp the sheer scale of destruction to Gaza’s water and sanitation infrastructure. Most vital water and sanitation networks have been entirely lost or paralyzed, which is creating catastrophic hygiene and health conditions.
    “Our staff and partners have told how people are stopping them in the streets asking for water, and that parents are not drinking to save water for their children. It is heartbreaking to hear about children having to walk for miles for a single jerrycan of water.”
    In the North Gaza governorate, almost all water wells have been destroyed by the Israeli military. Over 700,000 people have returned to find entire neighbourhoods wiped out. For the few whose homes remain standing, water is non-existent due to the destruction of rooftop storage tanks.
    In Rafah, over 90 percent of water wells and reservoirs have been partially or completely damaged, and water production is less than five percent of its capacity before the conflict. Only two out of 35 wells are currently operational.
    Despite efforts to resume water production since the ceasefire, the destruction of Gaza’s water pipelines means that 60 percent of water is leaking into the ground rather than reaching people.
    Oxfam and partners’ initial assessment after the ceasefire found:
    – More than 80 percent of water and sanitation infrastructure across the Gaza Strip has been partially or entirely destroyed, including all six major wastewater treatment plants.
    – 85 percent of the sewage pumping stations (73 out of 84) and networks have been destroyed. Some have been repaired but urgently require fuel to operate.
    – 85 percent of small desalination plants (85 out of 103) have been partially damaged or completely destroyed.
    – 67 percent of the 368 municipal wells have been destroyed. Most of the private small wells cannot function due to lack of fuel or generators.
    The lack of safe water, combined with untreated sewage overflowing in the streets has triggered an explosion of waterborne and infectious diseases. According to the World Health Organisation, 88 percent of environmental samples surveyed across Gaza were found contaminated with polio, signalling an imminent risk of outbreak. Infectious diseases including acute watery diarrhoea and respiratory infections – now the leading causes of death – are also surging, with 46,000 cases, mostly children, being reported each week.
    Chickenpox and skin diseases such as scabies and impetigo are also spreading rapidly, particularly among displaced populations in the Northern Gaza Governorate, where water shortages are most severe.
    Meanwhile, with no waste collection and transport for over 15 months, more than 2,000 tonnes of garbage has been piling up in the streets every day. This toxic combination of open sewage, uncollected waste and contaminated water is creating a perfect storm for a deadly disease outbreak.
    Lagouardat said: “Despite the increase in aid since the ceasefire, Israel continues to severely impair critical items needed to begin repairing the massive structural damage from its airstrikes. This includes desperately needed pipes for repairing water and sanitation networks, equipment like generators to operate wells.”
    Oxfam’s own 85 tonne-shipment of water pipes, fittings and water tanks – worth over $480,000 – had been held up for over six months because it was deemed as dual-use and “oversized” to enter. Israeli authorities only finally approved the shipment this week, although it has yet to enter.
    Lagouardat said: “Hundreds of thousands of displaced people across the Gaza Strip have had to resort to digging makeshift cesspits next to their tents. This daily discharge of approximately 130,000 cubic meters – the equivalent of 52 Olympic pools – of untreated sewage is contaminating the Mediterranean Sea and Gaza’s only aquifer.
    “Rebuilding water and sanitation is vital for Gaza to have a path to normalcy after 15 months of horror. The ceasefire must hold, and fuel and aid must flow so that Palestinians can rebuild their lives. Lasting peace for Palestinians and Israelis can only come through a permanent ceasefire and a just solution.”
    – Oxfam has recent photos and footage of water and sanitation destruction in Gaza and can be downloaded HERE(valid until 14 May 25)
    – According to the Coastal Municipalities Water Utility (CMWU) as of February 2025, a total of 1675 km out of 4,800 km of Gaza’s water and sanitation networks have been partially or entirely destroyed since October 2023. This includes 350km in North Gaza, 495km in Gaza City, 240 Km in the Middle area, 350km in Khan Younis, and 240km in Rafah respectively.
    – Data on water and sanitation destruction is based on the Coastal Municipalities Water Utility (CMWU) Rapid Damage Assessment Report, January 2025.
    – Data on cost of infrastructure repair is based on Gaza Municipality Planning and Investment Unit report of December 31, 2024.
    – According to Oxfam’s Water War Crime s report, the Gaza population had access to 82.7 litres per person per day before 7 October 2023. Currently Rafah has less than five percent of that amount; and North Gaza governorates have less than seven percent of that amount, or 5.7 litres per person per day.
    – According to the 10 Feb 2025 WASH Cluster report: only two (out of 35) wells in Rafah are currently operational.
    – Acute watery diarrhoea (AWD) in children under five years old was reported to be 13,179 cases. This accounts for approximately 54% of the total registered cases of AWD. Also, 21 out of 24 Polio environmental surveyed samples across Gaza (88%) were positive. Source: Polio Global Eradication Initiative (WHO & UN) on 1 Feb 2025
    – UNOSAT latest data collected on 1 December 2024 identified 60,368 destroyed structures, 20,050 severely damaged structures, 56,292 moderately damaged structures, and 34,102 possibly damaged structures for a total of 170,812 structures. The governorates of North Gaza and Rafah have experienced the highest rise in damage compared to the 6 September 2024 analysis, with around 3,138 new structures damaged in North Gaza and around 3,054 in Rafah. Within North Gaza, Jabalya municipality had the highest number of newly damaged structures, totalling 1,339. 

    MIL OSI New Zealand News –

    February 18, 2025
  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: New rail watchdog to give passengers a voice and hold railway to account

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Have your say on how new Great British Railways (GBR) will work to provide reliable services for passengers across the country.

    • plans unveiled for landmark rail reform bill to establish powerful passenger watchdog
    • rewiring of our railways will end decades of poor service, waste and timetable chaos
    • unified, simplified railway will put passengers first, raise living standards and boost growth as part of government’s Plan for Change

    Plans for a landmark bill to rewire Britain’s railways, including setting up a powerful passenger watchdog to give passengers a voice and hold train operators to account, have been unveiled by the government today (18 February 2025).

    This once in a generation overhaul will establish Great British Railways (GBR), a new body bringing track and train together, delivering reliable services for passengers and catalysing growth across the country.

    Outlined in a consultation launched today, the plans will smash a broken rail system, put passengers at the forefront of all decisions made on the railways, ending major failures and disruptions like the 2018 timetabling crisis.

    Through this consultation, the government will be working with industry to rewire the railways and unite train and track, putting an end to outdated and inefficient processes which have resulted in poor performance, timetable chaos and complex fares and ticketing. It will also rightly be giving devolved leaders more of a say on the services that directly impact their towns and cities, working together to integrate transport making it simpler to travel and attracting more people to our railways. 

    The new independent watchdog will be tasked with ensuring GBR addresses the issues that consistently rank highest in passenger complaints, rooting out the problems that cause poor journeys, ensuring passengers are given clear information when they travel and help tackle the maze of confusing rail fares and tickets passengers have to navigate.

    It will hold operators to account on behalf of passengers and arbitrate where passengers are not satisfied about the handling of a complaint. Working with the Transport Secretary and GBR, it will also be given the powers to set clear standards for passengers on things like journey information and assistance, investigate persistent problems and publish reports on poor service. Where poor passenger experiences are identified, it will be able to refer this to the railway regulator for enforcement action.

    Growth is at the heart of this government’s missions and the key priority in the Plan for Change, which is why one of GBR’s guiding principles will be to work closely with the private sector to create jobs and drive investment and innovation.

    This includes investing billions of pounds in the private sector supply chain, so that improvements to the network are more coordinated, giving longer-term assurance to businesses. A long-term rail strategy will give industry certainty on what they can expect, including a long-term plan for rolling stock.

    Open access services will continue having a place on the network where they encourage growth, improve connectivity and provide more choice for passengers, as long as these benefits are not outweighed by costs to the taxpayer and impacts performance.

    Secretary of State for Transport, Heidi Alexander, said: 

    Passengers have put up with broken railways for far too long. This landmark reform will sweep away decades of failure, creating a Great British Railways passengers can rely on.

    We’re giving passengers a powerful voice with a new watchdog dedicated to addressing their biggest concerns, building railways people can trust, improving our services and boosting the economy in the process – the priority in our Plan for Change.

    These plans are the next step in establishing GBR, which will end years of fragmentation by bringing track and train together in a unified, simplified railway. As part of the biggest overhaul to the network in a generation, we will be raising living standards and connecting people to work, education, healthcare and leisure, supporting growth across the country.

    The consultation also looks more widely at far-reaching reforms and how GBR will interact with the industry to effectively implement its plans to relentlessly focus on driving up standards, boosting our economy and ensuring our railways deliver the services passengers deserve.

    Laura Shoaf, Chair of Shadow Great British Railways, said: 

    GBR will fundamentally change our railways, delivering growth, connections and opportunities across the country.

    The plans set out today will mean a better railway for everyone that uses it, allowing industry to work closer together, putting passengers and customers first and providing better value for money for taxpayers.

    Andy Burnham, Mayor of Greater Manchester, said:

    This is a once-in-a-generation opportunity to overhaul how the railways are run – creating a service that puts passengers first, with more reliable trains and simpler fares and tickets.

    In Greater Manchester things are already changing.  We’re working in partnership with the government and the rail industry on plans for the next phase of the Bee Network, to join up our trains, buses, trams and active travel routes, moving from a fragmented system to one that is more accountable to our residents. We look forward to helping shape the bill, with a statutory role for Mayors and city regions in making the railways work for everyone.

    This government is already working to deliver reforms ahead of Great British Railways being set up, including simplifying fares and modernising ticketing. This includes the rollout of Pay As You Go ticketing to give passengers the ability to travel more flexibly and working with devolved leaders on plans for further expansion in Greater Manchester and the West Midlands.

    In addition to this, our flagship Public Ownership Act, which achieved Royal Assent last year, will improve reliability and support the government’s number one priority of boosting economic growth, by encouraging more people to use the railway. This will also save taxpayers up to £150 million a year that will be invested straight back into the railways rather than the pockets of private shareholders.

    North East Mayor, Kim McGuinness, said:

    Passengers are crying out for a rail service that works for them. We need our train services to be joined up and much more reliable – helping more people get to where they need to be for the right price.  

    The North East is poised to make the most of the opportunity that rail reform presents to transform the network. Our recent North East Local Transport Plan public consultation shows most people want an integrated network and that’s what I will deliver in North East England. We are already taking steps to integrate rail ticketing in our region with the Metro system but we are ready to do so much more.

    A railway fit for Britain’s future consultation starts today and will last for 8 weeks.

    Rail media enquiries

    Media enquiries 0300 7777878

    Switchboard 0300 330 3000

    Share this page

    The following links open in a new tab

    • Share on Facebook (opens in new tab)
    • Share on Twitter (opens in new tab)

    Updates to this page

    Published 18 February 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom –

    February 18, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Canada: Statement from Premier Pillai on the Council of the Federation Washington, D.C., mission

    Statement from Premier Pillai on the Council of the Federation Washington, D.C., mission
    jlutz
    February 17, 2025 – 11:20 am

    Premier Ranj Pillai has issued the following statement:

    “Last week, alongside my fellow Premiers, I travelled to Washington, D.C., to reinforce the deep and enduring ties between Canada and the United States. As a unified voice, all 13 territorial and provincial Premiers reinforced the significance of Canada-U.S. relations and challenged harmful tariffs.

    “We met with key representatives from Congress, business leaders and policy experts to discuss Arctic security and the importance of maintaining strong trade and economic ties. The meetings included a discussion at the White House with senior officials close to President Trump, including Deputy Chief of Staff James Blair. As Premiers, we gained valuable insight into the administration’s approach and emphasized the need for cross-border cooperation – particularly in addressing the alarming rise of fentanyl, which has severely impacted the Yukon and communities in both countries.

    “To bring northern voices to the international stage, I joined Premier of the Northwest Territories R.J. Simpson and Premier of Nunavut P.J. Akeeagok in a panel discussion at the Wilson Center. We highlighted our territories’ role in Arctic security, the strategic importance of critical minerals and the need for Indigenous-led economic initiatives.

    “Building a strong, resilient economy in the Yukon remains a top priority for this government, which is why I focused discussions on how we can strengthen cross-border trade, investment and infrastructure partnerships. In addition, as part of a meeting hosted by the Canadian American Business Council, I met with business leaders to explore opportunities for increased investment in the Yukon. I then met with Alaska Senator Lisa Murkowski and House Representative Nick Begich to discuss our relations with Alaska. We talked about the importance of working together as neighbours and the impact of tariffs on both our citizens.

    “While recent trade tensions between Canada and the U.S. remain a concern, it is important that there is constructive dialogue and solutions that reinforce the mutual economic benefits of a strong partnership. Our economies are deeply interconnected and it is in our mutual interest to foster trade policies that support growth, innovation and prosperity on both sides of the border. Canada and the United States have always found ways to work through challenges and I am confident we will continue to do so.

    “Thank you to my fellow Premiers for standing united as Team Canada throughout this trip and a special thanks to Ontario Premier Doug Ford in his role as the current Council of the Federation Chair for leading these efforts.

    “Together, we are defending Canadian jobs, our economy and our way of life.”
     

    MIL OSI Canada News –

    February 18, 2025
←Previous Page
1 … 1,370 1,371 1,372 1,373 1,374 … 1,899
Next Page→
NewzIntel.com

NewzIntel.com

MIL Open Source Intelligence

  • Blog
  • About
  • FAQs
  • Authors
  • Events
  • Shop
  • Patterns
  • Themes

Twenty Twenty-Five

Designed with WordPress