Category: Politics

  • MIL-OSI Australia: $23 million for new key health worker accommodation for communities in the Murrumbidgee

    Source: New South Wales Government 2

    Headline: $23 million for new key health worker accommodation for communities in the Murrumbidgee

    Published: 18 February 2025

    Released by: Minister for Regional Health


    Communities in Griffith, Deniliquin and Lake Cargelligo are set to benefit from new Key Worker Accommodation which will help attract, recruit and retain more healthcare workers to the region.

    The Minns Labor Government will invest $23 million in health worker housing in the Murrumbidgee region as part of the Key Health Worker Accommodation program.

    The $200.1 million program supports more than 20 projects across rural, regional and remote NSW.

    The funding will secure approximately 120 dwellings across regional NSW, which includes the building of new accommodation, refurbishment of existing living quarters and the purchase of suitable properties such as residential units.

    The four-year program will support the recruitment and retention of more than 500 health workers and their families by providing a range of accommodation options.

    The program is one of a number of investments the Minns Labor Government is making to strengthen the regional, rural and remote health workforce and builds on the success of the NSW Government’s $73.2 million investment in key health worker accommodation across five regional local health districts (Far West, Murrumbidgee, Southern NSW, Hunter New England and Western NSW).

    Quotes attributable to Minister for Regional Health, Ryan Park:

    “The Minns Labor Government is committed to investing in modern, sustainable accommodation options for key health workers who are the backbone of our regional, rural and remote communities.

    “Strengthening our regional health workforce is a key priority for our government and this $23 million investment in accommodation will support attraction of key healthcare workers to the Murrumbidgee.

    “The Key Health Worker Accommodation program will support Murrumbidgee Local Health District in providing high-quality health services to the community.”

    Quote attributable to Member for Murray, Helen Dalton:

    “This investment is set to significantly benefit communities across Griffith and Deniliquin. The success of the initiative in other areas such as Narrandera, Finley and West Wyalong shows that provision of quality housing can help to attract and retain essential healthcare professionals to regional and rural areas.

    “With the new Griffith Base Hospital opening soon it is also a wonderful time to be promoting our community as an attractive destination for healthcare workers looking to take the next step in their career, or enjoy a tree change to our beautiful region.”

    Quote attributable to Member for Barwon, Roy Butler:

    “Lake Cargelligo is warm and friendly community, with a dedicated team working at their MPS. Accommodation in town is tight at the best of times, so providing more places to live for health workers is essential for the community.

    “More accommodation for health workers means less pressure on local rental and housing markets. Rural and remote communities desperately need more accommodation for our key workers, and this will be a good start.”

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Manjumup’s Rea Park lighting upgrade complete

    Source: Australian Executive Government Ministers

    The Albanese and Cook Governments continue to partner with the Shire of Manjimup to deliver high-priority local infrastructure – with a lighting upgrade complete at the Rea Park and Collier Street redevelopment in Manjimup, in the state’s south-west.

    Officially opened today by Labor Senator for WA, Varun Ghosh alongside the Shire of Manjimup President, Donelle Buegge – the nearly $1.7 million project delivered LED field lighting on all current sporting fields at the reserve.

    This will support increased participation, provide local clubs with more flexibility for training and competitions, and boost the safety of night time activity at the Rea Park and Collier Street.

    The project is part of a larger $20 million Manjimup Rea Park and Collier Street redevelopment, which is transforming the reserve into a premier facility catering for sporting and non-sporting community events.

    This upgrade was supported by $675,000 from the Australian Government under the Local Roads and Community Infrastructure Program, more than $483,000 from WA Government Club Night Lights Program, over $513,000 from the Shire of Manjimup and $27,000 from Cricket Australia.

    Quotes attributable to Minister for Regional Development and Local Government, Kristy McBain MP:

    “It’s great to see the lighting upgrade completed at the Rea Park and Collier Street reserve in Manjimup, with this just one of many projects in which we’re partnering with the Shire of Manjimup, as part of more than $5 million in LRCI funding from the Australian Government.

    “Sport is the heartbeat of every regional community, which is why we’ve invested in this high-priority upgrade – because without good lighting, our clubs can’t train after hours, and they can’t attract new members.”

    Quotes attributable to Senator for Western Australia, Varun Ghosh:

    “These lighting upgrades to Rea Park and Collier Street Reserve will mean more training and playing time for local sports clubs and a greater capacity to host games and competitions. 

    “The Albanese Government is proud to join the Western Australian Government and the Shire of Manjimup in supporting this project, which will let locals use the reserve for sport, exercise, and activities at night.”

    Quotes attributable to Member for Warren-Blackwood, Jane Kelsbie:

    “It’s fantastic to see Stage 1 of the Manjimup Rea Park and Collier Street Redevelopment completed! This investment in modern LED lighting and upgraded electrical infrastructure is a game-changer for local sports and events.

    “Rea Park and Collier Street Reserve are at the heart of the sporting community, and this redevelopment is all about making sure local clubs and players have the facilities they deserve. I’m proud to have worked with the Cook Labor Government to deliver $483,475 through the Club Night Lights Program to help make this project a reality.

    “I’m also excited to share that a re-elected Cook Labor Government will commit $1.25 million for Stage 2. I’ve fought hard to secure this commitment because I know how much this project means to the community. Investing in local sporting and community spaces means better facilities, more opportunities for participation, and stronger connections for families, players, and volunteers — now and into the future.”

    Quotes attributable to Manjimup Shire President Cr Donelle Buegge:

    “The completion of Stage 1 of the Manjimup Rea Park and Collier Street Redevelopment project is a fantastic achievement for our community.

    “This investment in modern LED field lighting and upgraded electrical infrastructure marks a major step in transforming Rea Park and Collier Street Reserve into a premier sporting and community precinct.

    “Thanks to the strong partnership between the Australian, WA and local governments, we are building a brighter future for sports and events in our region.

    “We look forward to continuing this momentum as we work towards the implementation of Stage 2 of the project.”

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-Evening Report: Online violence and misogyny are still on the rise – NZ needs a tougher response

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Cassandra Mudgway, Senior Lecturer in Law, University of Canterbury

    Yesterday’s revelation of a 2023 standoff between the Human Rights Commission and New Zealand’s internet safety agencies highlights lingering concern about the current online safety code.

    According to the report from RNZ, the commission told NZ Tech and Netsafe that social media companies X Corp. and Meta failed to protect former prime minister Jacinda Ardern from misogynistic and dehumanising violence across their platforms.

    The commission’s claim that the Code of Practice for Online Safety and Harms was not fit for purpose apparently drew a sharp legal response from the agencies, which argued the commission showed bias and had overstepped its remit.

    But the historical incident raises important questions New Zealand has yet to grapple with properly.

    Established in 2022, the code is a voluntary set of commitments co-designed with the technology industry, including some social media companies such as Meta and X-Corp.

    Companies become signatories to the code and agree to its commitments. The current signatories are Meta, Google, TikTok, Twitch and X Corp.

    Among other provisions, the code asks signatories to take steps to reduce harmful content on their platforms or services, including harassment (where there is an intent to cause harm), hate speech (which includes sexist hate speech), incitement of violence and disinformation.

    The code is not legally enforceable. Compliance relies on willingness to adopt such measures. But there is an accountability structure in the form of an oversight committee. The public can lodge complaints with the committee if they believe signatories have breached the code, and the committee can remove a signatory from the code.

    When it was launched, the code received some international acclaim as an example of best practice for digital safety. But its critics argued that because it was co-written with social media companies, the commitments were not as strong or effective as they might have been.

    Jacinda Ardern was the target of extreme levels of online misogyny and violent rhetoric.
    Hagen Hopkins/Getty Images

    Is the code effective?

    Last year, Netsafe rang the alarm about increasing rates of online misogyny and violent extremism, including the targeting of public figures and politicians.

    This raises obvious questions about the code’s effectiveness. Since the Human Rights Commission cited the extreme online violence directed at Jacinda Ardern, former Green Party MP Golriz Ghahraman has spoken about the violent online misogyny and racism she experienced while in office.

    These forms of gender-based violence are a breach of women’s human rights. They also lead to women politicians self-censoring, avoiding social media, and generally having less contact with the public.

    Some overseas studies have shown prolonged exposure to online violence has led to women MPs leaving office sooner than planned. Overall, online harm endangers representative democracy and breaches women’s rights to participate in politics.

    The human rights implications also mean the New Zealand government has legal duties under international treaties to prevent online gender-based violence.

    The United Nations has also called on social media companies to do more to prevent the spread of racial hatred. As such, it is a function of the Human Rights Commission to promote and monitor compliance with international standards.

    NZ is out of step internationally

    In its current form, the code is not effective. Its commitments aim to reduce harm rather than eliminate it, and it is not comprehensive about the kinds of harm it wants signatories to reduce.

    For example, it does not include reference to “volumetric” attacks – the type of coordinated harassment campaigns against a person that were directed at Ardern.

    Further, the code’s threshold for “harm” is high, requiring the online violence to pose an imminent and serious threat to users’ safety. This does not easily capture the types of gender-based violence, such as misogynistic hate speech, that over time normalise violence against women.

    The code also emphasises the role of users in managing harmful content, rather than placing a responsibility on the platforms to investigate how their services and technologies might be misused to cause harm.

    Relying on voluntary commitments also puts New Zealand out of step with other countries such as the United Kingdom and Australia which have legally enforceable requirements for social media companies to protect online safety.

    Placing that burden on users – to block, report or remove content – is merely reactive. It does not prevent harm because it has already happened. And for some groups, such as MPs and public figures, the harm they receive can be overwhelming and seemingly endless.

    Preventing online gender-based violence requires proactive measures that are legally enforceable. To fulfil its international obligations, the government should urgently review the need for legal regulation that places the burden of online safety on large social media companies rather than on users.

    Cassandra Mudgway does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. Online violence and misogyny are still on the rise – NZ needs a tougher response – https://theconversation.com/online-violence-and-misogyny-are-still-on-the-rise-nz-needs-a-tougher-response-250033

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Three new projects for Albury Wodonga

    Source: Australian Executive Government Ministers

    The Albanese Government is partnering with all levels of government to Build Australia’s Future, with $7 million in federal funding supporting the delivery of recreational, tourism and education projects in the Albury Wodonga region.

    Delivered as part of the Albanese Government’s $80 million investment in the Albury Wodonga Regional Projects (AWRP) initiative, the new projects include:

    • The Oddies Creek (Albury) Park Play Space
    • The Wodonga Creek precinct development 
    • An Advanced Manufacturing Centre of Excellence (Wodonga TAFE) 

    Upgrades to the Oddies Creek Park in Albury include construction of a splash park, plant room and water treatment system, as well as fencing and gates, paths and landscaping. 

    The works respond to calls from the community to provide a free and safe family friendly splash park close to the river for residents and tourists. The $5 million project is being jointly funded by the Australian Government and the Albury City Council.

    The splash park will be accessible from both sides of the Murray, enhancing tourism in the region as well as improving amenity and liveability for locals. Design works for the project will begin in early 2025, with completion expected in mid-2026.

    The $5 million Wodonga Creek precinct development, jointly funded by the Albanese Government and Wodonga Council, will link the Wodonga central business area, Belvoir Park and Gateway Island through to Albury by connecting to the existing Wodonga pathways network.

    Stronger connections between the town centre and Wodonga Creek will enable a range of tourism, leisure and economic opportunities. Planning and design has commenced, with construction commencing mid-2026. 

    The $2 million Advanced Manufacturing Centre of Excellence at Wodonga TAFE’s Logic campus is fully funded by the Albanese Government – as part of the Government’s commitment to investing in critical skills that will help with Building Australia’s Future.

    The facility will enable a tactile introduction to advanced manufacturing within a suite of labs, providing introductory programs and basic prototyping capabilities for small and medium enterprises. Construction will commence mid-2025.

    These latest projects are being delivered alongside six other commitments funded through the AWRP initiative, with the Albanese Government also investing:

    • $22 million for the Heavy Vehicle Technology Program at Wodonga TAFE
    • $20 million towards infrastructure that supports better health outcomes
    • $15 million towards housing for essential workers
    • $10 million towards the Albury Entertainment Centre redevelopment
    • $5 million for the Albury Airport Western precinct expansion
    • $1 million for First Nations priority projects

    A further investment of $15 million from the NSW Government and $6.5 million from the Albury City Council brings the total investment for the Albury Entertainment Centre redevelopment to $31.5 million.

    Quotes attributable to Federal Minister for Regional Development and Local Government, Kristy McBain MP:

    “The Albanese Government continues to partner with all levels of government to deliver region-shaping infrastructure, with these latest projects to have a lasting impact in the Albury Wodonga region.

    “These projects will expand tourism opportunities, improve local amenities, and support the region to gain and retain skills in advanced manufacturing – an industry critical to Building Australia’s Future.” 

    Quotes attributable to Minister for Regional NSW Tara Moriarty:

    “With the Oddies Creek Splash Park added to the Albury Wodonga Regional Projects we are seeing the delivery of a diverse network of attractions and economic drivers that will invigorate local tourism and business prospects across the Murray region.

    “These projects aren’t just about building facilities; they’re about strengthening community ties and supporting economic growth for residents on both sides of the border.

    “Together with Albury City Council, the Australian and NSW governments are positioning Albury as a hub for regional growth and enriching the lives of residents in the greater Albury-Wodonga area.”

    Quotes attributable to Minister for Regional Development Victoria Jaclyn Symes:

    “Our investment in Wodonga is creating jobs and growing the local economy – while supporting education, sport and tourism opportunities.”

    Quotes attributable to Federal Labor Senator for NSW, Deborah O’Neill:

    “Oddies Creek Park is already a much-loved destination in Albury, attracting more than 200,000 visitors a year – which is why we’re investing in its future.

    “Our $2.5 million investment in this splash park responds to community feedback, and is another example of the Albanese Government’s commitment to investing in local priority projects in NSW.” 

    Quotes attributable to Federal Labor Senator for Victoria, Lisa Darmanin: 

    “TAFE changes lives. I’m thrilled that the Albanese Government is supporting people in the Wodonga region to retrain close to home, while also learning critical skills that build Australia’s future.

    “The Wodonga Creek has a lot to offer to the community. Our $2.5 million investment will provide new leisure opportunities for locals and attract more visitors to the region, strengthening the local tourism industry.”

    Quotes attributable to Albury City Council Mayor Kevin Mack:

    “Albury City welcomes formal confirmation of this funding from the Australian Government to help us bring the Oddies Creek splash park project to life. 

    “A key element of the recently endorsed Murray River Experience Masterplan and a much-needed facility which our community, particularly young people and families, have been seeking for some time, the splash park project offers significant local and regional tourism potential.

    “It brings us closer to achieving our community’s vision for Albury to be a nationally significant regional city that is vibrant, diverse, innovative and connected, and inspired by its culture, environment and location on the Murray River.”

    Quotes attributable to Wodonga Council Mayor Michael Gobel: 

    “Wodonga Council welcomes this federal investment; this type of support is not just an economic driver, it’s an investment in our residents and community.

    “Tourism, recreation and education are pillars of a thriving city and these projects, including the Wodonga Creek precinct development and the development of the Advanced Manufacturing Centre of Excellence, will open doors to new opportunities for our youth, local businesses and ensure Wodonga remains a dynamic place to live and grow.”

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI: Move Digital Announces Strategic Expansion into Robotics Manufacturing

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    MAHE, SEYCHELLES, Feb. 17, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Move Digital, a global leader in blockchain and AI technologies, is proud to announce its strategic expansion into the field of robotics manufacturing. This initiative underscores the company’s commitment to leveraging advanced technologies to enhance everyday living.

    Building upon its recent endeavors to strengthen consultancy services for governments, global leaders, and family offices—particularly in Tokyo, Monaco, Sydney, Hong Kong, and Singapore—Move Digital is now poised to revolutionize the household robotics sector. The company plans to establish state-of-the-art production facilities in China and Vietnam, aiming to develop cutting-edge robotics solutions that elevate the quality of life in private households.

    At the helm of this ambitious venture is CEO Kristof Schöffling, a serial tech entrepreneur with over 15 years of experience leading technology companies. Schöffling’s impressive track record includes several successful exits, positioning him as the ideal leader to navigate Move Digital into the forefront of robotics innovation. His visionary approach and dedication to integrating advanced technologies have been instrumental in shaping the company’s strategic direction.

    “Our expansion into robotics manufacturing represents a significant milestone for Move Digital,” stated Schöffling. “We are committed to developing innovative solutions that not only harness the power of AI and blockchain but also bring tangible benefits to households worldwide. By establishing production facilities in China and Vietnam, we are strategically positioned to leverage regional expertise and resources, ensuring the highest standards of quality and efficiency in our robotics products.”

    The global robotics industry is experiencing unprecedented growth, with projections indicating an expansion from $46 billion in 2024 to $169.8 billion by 2032. This surge is driven by advancements in artificial intelligence and machine learning, enabling robots to perform increasingly complex tasks autonomously. Move Digital’s entry into this dynamic market aligns with these trends, as the company seeks to develop AI-enabled robots equipped with smart digital manufacturing systems.

    In line with its commitment to innovation, Move Digital plans to implement flexible, modular production cells that are digitally connected and networked, served by intelligent autonomous mobile robots. These AI-powered systems will undertake tasks such as assembly and material handling, relieving individuals from these duties and enabling more rewarding activities.

    Kristof Schöffling’s leadership is pivotal in driving this transformative journey. His extensive experience in emerging technologies and his strategic foresight have been crucial in positioning Move Digital at the cutting edge of innovation. Under his guidance, the company is set to make significant contributions to the robotics industry, delivering solutions that enhance daily living and set new standards in technological excellence.

    As Move Digital embarks on this exciting new chapter, it remains steadfast in its mission to harness the power of technology to create meaningful, impactful solutions for individuals and communities around the globe.

    About Move Digital

    Move Digital is a global blockchain and AI technology firm specializing in the development of innovative applications for the B2B sector. With a focus on delivering cutting-edge solutions, the company is dedicated to driving technological advancements that enhance business operations and improve quality of life.

    Media Contact

    Brand: Move Digital Limited

    Contact: Kristof Schöffling

    Email: hello@movedigital.io

    Website: https://movedigital.com

    SOURCE: Move Digital Limited

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI Canada: The Haida Nation and Canada announce a first-of-its-kind agreement recognizing Aboriginal title on Haida Gwaii

    Source: Government of Canada – Prime Minister

    Today, the President of the Haida Nation, Gaagwiis Jason Alsop, the Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau, and the Minister of Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs and Minister responsible for the Canadian Northern Economic Development Agency, Gary Anandasangaree, announced the signing of the Chiix̲uujin / Chaaw K̲aawgaa “Big Tide (Low Water)” Haida Title Lands Agreement. The Agreement includes Canada’s recognition of Haida Aboriginal title to lands on Haida Gwaii and marks a significant milestone in the journey to reconciliation.

    Canada’s recognition of Haida Aboriginal title on Haida Gwaii includes the foreshore and extends to the low-water mark. The Agreement does not affect private property interests or local and municipal governments on Haida Gwaii, and it confirms the continued delivery of federal public services. The Haida-Canada Archipelago Management Board will also continue to co-operatively manage Gwaii Haanas through a transition period, during which both governments will work to reconcile jurisdictions and laws.

    The Haida Nation collectively holds inherent Haida title and rights as described in the Constitution of the Haida Nation. At a Special House of Assembly on November 24, 2024, Haida citizens voted 97 per cent in favour of the Chiix̲uujin / Chaaw K̲aawgaa “Big Tide (Low Water)” Haida Title Lands Agreement. As a result, the Agreement was signed by the Haida Nation and Canada on December 4, 2024.

    Over an estimated five-year transition period, the Haida Nation and Canada will continue to work respectfully and co-operatively on matters relating to Haida Gwaii. Both governments have agreed that this transition will be implemented in an orderly and incremental way, providing ongoing stability for all island residents and other interest holders on Haida Gwaii.

    This Agreement builds on previous reconciliation accomplishments, including the Nang K̲’uula / Nang K̲’úulaas Recognition Agreement signed by the Haida Nation, Canada, and British Columbia in 2023, as well as the Gaayhllxid / Gíihlagalgang “Rising Tide” Haida Title Lands Agreement signed by the Haida Nation and British Columbia in April 2024.

    The Chiix̲uujin / Chaaw K̲aawgaa “Big Tide (Low Water)” Haida Title Lands Agreement is a concrete demonstration of Canada’s commitment to implementing and advancing the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. Canada’s recognition of Haida Aboriginal title results from Gud ad T’alang HlG̲ang.gulx̲a Tll Yahda / Tll yá’adee G̲ii gud ahl t’álang hlG̲ángulaang (“People Working Together to Make it Right”) – and, in this way, upholds the duty and honour of the Crown based on a principled and respectful nation-to-nation relationship.

    Quotes

    “The recognition of Haida title to Haida Gwaii by Canada acknowledges historic injustices and illustrates the transformative possibilities of working together for what is right. It takes leadership to recognize a wrong, begin the process of healing from a troubled history, and trust in the ability to forge a new relationship based on respect. This recognition of title by Canada – which was initiated in 1913 by our past leaders – means that we can begin a new era of peaceful co-existence knowing that we can look after Haida Gwaii and ensure the well-being of all who call these shining islands home.”

    “I congratulate the Haida Nation for their leadership on this landmark agreement. As we mark a new chapter in the history of our nation-to-nation relationship, let us also recommit to walking the path of reconciliation. Because by working together, we’re showing that meaningful progress is possible.”

    “This landmark agreement is the first of its kind in Canada. It stands as a testament to the Haida Nation’s incredible leadership and determination to reclaim what has been rightfully theirs for generations. By recognizing Aboriginal title and rights, we showcase the progress possible when Indigenous, federal, provincial, and territorial governments work together to create a just and meaningful path to reconciliation that honours the unique interests of each nation. It is my hope that this agreement sets the stage for many others and inspires young Indigenous people that reconciliation is more than words and change is possible.”

    “The signing of the Chiix̲uujin / Chaaw K̲aawgaa “Big Tide (Low Water)” Haida Title Lands Agreement is a testament to respect, responsibility, and interconnectedness between the Council of the Haida Nation and the Government of Canada. For over 30 years, the Haida Nation and Canada – through Parks Canada – have worked side by side to protect Gwaii Haanas, a place of global significance. Today’s celebration marks another step in this journey, strengthening our partnership and honouring the inherent Haida title to the beautiful lands of Haida Gwaii.”

    “Canada is an important partner in this historic reconciliation work, and I am grateful that they have now also worked alongside the Haida Nation on an agreement that recognizes Haida Aboriginal title. The provincial Gaayhllxid / Gíihlagalgang “Rising Tide” Haida Title Lands Agreement and federal Chiix̲uujin / Chaaw K̲aawgaa “Big Tide (Low Water)” Haida Title Lands Agreement work together to recognize Aboriginal title for the Haida – a profound and historic shift in our relationship. They also provide stability for all islanders on Haida Gwaii with respect to the pathway forward. This is the next step on our shared journey and the way toward a new future in Haida Gwaii.”

    Quick Facts

    • The Council of the Haida Nation (CHN) was formed as a national government in 1974, and the Constitution of the Haida Nation was formally adopted in 2003. The Constitution mandates the CHN to conduct the external affairs and steward the lands and waters of Haida Gwaii on behalf of the Haida Nation, ensuring that the Haida relationship with Haida Gwaii continues in perpetuity.
    • Haida Gwaii is located approximately 100 kilometres west of the northern coast of mainland British Columbia. It is a group of over 200 islands totalling approximately one million hectares.
    • The Haida have been on Haida Gwaii for millennia.
    • In 2021, Canada, the Haida Nation, and British Columbia signed the GayG̲ahlda / Kwah.hlahl.dáyaa “Changing Tide” Framework for Reconciliation, setting out an incremental approach to negotiating reconciliation agreements. The Nang K̲’uula / Nang K̲’úulaas Recognition Agreement is the first tripartite agreement reached under this renewed process of negotiations.
    • Through the Nang K̲’uula / Nang K̲’úulaas Recognition Agreement, Canada and British Columbia recognized the Haida Nation as the holder of inherent rights of governance and self-determination, and the CHN as the governing body of the Haida Nation.
    • On November 7, 2024, Bill S-16, An Act respecting the recognition of the Haida Nation and the Council of the Haida Nation, received royal assent.

    Associated Links

    MIL OSI Canada News

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: PM confirms ACT’s Defence spend target still on the table

    Source: ACT Party

    “A two-percent-of-GDP Defence target is turning into an emerging ACT triumph,” says ACT Defence spokesperson Mark Cameron.

    “I’m very pleased to hear the Prime Minister flag a target for Defence investment of two percent of GDP. ACT has long argued for this target, in line with the NATO benchmark, to secure our position in a changing world.

    “Protecting our citizens is the first and most important role of government. In previous alternative Budgets, ACT has outlined how we can shift spending away from the nice-to-haves and into Defence.

    “If we want to be taken seriously by our friends as an ally worth defending, we need to show we’re doing our part. That could mean sending peacekeeping troops to Ukraine, but it shouldn’t just be a token contribution. We need to equip our personnel with the expertise, technology, and interoperability to make a genuine contribution alongside the big players. That means more investment, and ACT has campaigned on this reality for two election cycles.”

    Last month, Mark Cameron and ACT MP Laura McClure published an op-ed making the case for a two-percent-of-GDP Defence target.

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Waller, Disinflation Progress Uneven but Still on Track Rates Cuts on Track as Well

    Source: US State of New York Federal Reserve

    Thank you, Bruce, and thank you for the opportunity to speak to you today. It’s great being back in Sydney and seeing old friends—like the Opera House!
    As I look at the U.S. economy today, I see that the real side is doing just fine but progress on lowering inflation has come in fits and starts.1 After two good months of inflation data for November and December, January once again disappointed and showed that progress on inflation remains uneven. I continue to believe that the current setting of monetary policy is restricting economic activity somewhat and putting downward pressure on inflation. If this winter-time lull in progress is temporary, as it was last year, then further policy easing will be appropriate. But until that is clear, I favor holding the policy rate steady.
    Spending by households and businesses has proved to be resilient, we have solid growth in real gross domestic product (GDP) and the latest data on employment, including revisions to most of 2024, support the view that labor market is in a sweet spot. Meanwhile, last week’s January inflation data have a similar feel to that of January 2024, albeit to a smaller degree; they surprised on the high side and raised concerns that the progress we made in pushing inflation toward our 2 percent goal would stall out. But once we got past the first quarter of last year, we did see continued progress in reducing inflation in the latter part of the year. The question now is if we will see progress again later this year, as we did in 2024.
    Progress on inflation is an important consideration in policymakers’ judgment about whether monetary policy needs adjustment in the near term. The continued solid labor market is one reason why I supported the Federal Open Market Committee’s (FOMC) decision at the end of January to hold our policy rate steady. After two good inflation reports for November and December there was concern about a January bounce back in inflation. So based on good labor market data and concerns about a seasonal shock to inflation not fully adjusted in the data, I felt it was prudent to stand pat at our January meeting. Given last week’s inflation report, that concern was warranted.
    Let me pause here for a moment to address some commentary after the FOMC meeting that cited uncertainty about the new Administration’s policies as a leading reason for that decision. We must keep in mind that there is always a degree of uncertainty about economic policy, and we need to act based on incoming data even when facing great uncertainty about the economic landscape. We have done this in the past and will continue to do so in the future.
    Let me provide two recent examples where the FOMC acted in the face of great uncertainty. In March 2022, inflation was roaring, and rate hikes were on the table. Then Russia invaded Ukraine, which created tremendous economic uncertainty around the globe. Not only did the FOMC raise the policy rate in March 2022 for the first time since 2019, but in subsequent meetings we also implemented large rate hikes for several meetings. We could not wait for uncertainty about the war to be resolved.
    The second episode was in March of 2023 when stresses emerged in the U.S. banking system, stemming in part from the failures of Silicon Valley Bank and Credit Suisse, with the latter occurring the weekend before our March FOMC meeting. There was great uncertainty as to whether these events would lead to financial instability and a significant contraction of credit that could trigger a recession. Many forecasters projected a recession would hit in the second half of 2023 as a result. Consequently, there were calls to stop hiking the policy rate due to a tremendous amount of financial and banking uncertainty. But the Federal Reserve worked in concert with other government agencies and used its financial stabilization tools to deal with the banking issues and continued raising the policy rate to deal with inflation.2 So the moral of this story is that monetary policy cannot be put on hold waiting for these types of uncertainty to resolve.
    Putting uncertainty aside, let me turn to my view of the economic data. As I noted, real GDP continued to grow solidly in the fourth quarter, at a pace of 2.3 percent, and would have been nearly 1 percentage point stronger without a reduction in inventories, which tend to be volatile. Personal consumption expenditures (PCE), which are typically two-thirds of GDP, grew a robust 4.2 percent in the fourth quarter. As was noted in the Fed’s latest Monetary Policy Report to Congress, households have a solid level of liquid assets to sustain their spending. Based on the limited data we have for the first quarter of 2025 this solid growth seems to be continuing. The employment report for January, which I will focus on in a moment, indicated a continued strong labor market, which should support consumption. Retail sales are reported to have fallen back in January after a strong rise in December, but given how volatile these data can be, and given that the cold weather in January probably held down sales, I’m not putting much weight on that reading for the time being. Business sentiment, as reflected in surveys of purchasing managers in both manufacturing and non-manufacturing, was among the most consistently positive in a while. The index for manufacturing businesses was 50.9, the first time since October 2022 that these results topped 50, as sentiment indicators about orders, production, and employment were all expanding. The corresponding index for the large majority of businesses outside manufacturing also indicated expansion, as it has for some time. The Blue Chip consensus of private forecasters and the Atlanta Fed’s GDP Now forecast based on the data in hand predict growth this quarter similar to that of the end of last year. To circle back to my message earlier, many people predicted that tariffs proposed by the Administration on February 1 would have a significant effect on trade and consumption in the first quarter, not to mention prices, but after the postponement of some of those tariffs, it is unclear to me if and when that might show up in the data. I will, of course, be watching closely, but I haven’t altered my outlook based on what has been implemented to date.
    As I noted earlier, data on the labor market indicate that it is in a good spot, with employers having an easier time filling jobs than earlier in the expansion but with still ample demand for new workers and new jobs being created. The unemployment rate ticked down to 4 percent, which is just about where it has been for the past year. Employers added a net 143,000 jobs in January, down some from a 204,000 average for the final three months of 2024 but right around the 133,000 average for the quarter before that. Two factors that may have held down this number a bit were cold weather and the fires in Los Angeles, which prevented thousands of people from getting to or performing their jobs. Beyond payrolls, the ratio of job vacancies to the number of unemployed people stands at 1.1, close to the level before the pandemic.
    Wage growth continues to be strong, and it has considerably outpaced price increases, but is down from two years ago, and for a few reasons, I don’t judge recent data as indicating that wages are a factor preventing inflation from making continued progress toward 2 percent. Though the January reading of average hourly earnings was a bit elevated, this series is pretty volatile and the reading may have been held up by weather-related issues. Smoothing through the monthly fluctuations, we see wage growth fairly steady at 4 percent a month over the past year. Broader measures of worker compensation show a more distinct moderation in growth. The Labor Department’s employment cost index has fallen gradually but consistently from 4.2 percent at the end of 2023 to 3.8 percent at its last reading.
    As for whether 4 percent wage growth is consistent with 2 percent inflation, I will note, as I have before, that productivity has grown at roughly a 2 percent annual rate since the advent of the pandemic—and slightly faster than that in 2023 and 2024. Unless that productivity trend changes a lot, wage growth is consistent with bringing inflation down to 2 percent.
    Turning to inflation, last week’s data taken as a whole were mildly disappointing but not nearly so disappointing as a focus on the consumer price index (CPI) alone would have indicated. Total CPI inflation for January came in hot at 0.5 percent, and core was 0.4 percent, which brings the 12-month changes to 3.0 percent and 3.3 percent, respectively. These 12-month readings are lower than we had in January 2024, so we have made some progress over the past year, but they are still too high.
    However, we also received producer price data last week, and, combining that information with the CPI data, forecasts for January PCE inflation aren’t as alarming as the CPI inflation data. Estimates for total PCE inflation, the FOMC’s preferred measure, are about 0.3 percent and that for core PCE inflation was around 0.25 percent. These numbers will mean a bump-up in the monthly pace of core inflation of about one-tenth of 1 percentage point from readings of under 0.2 percent in November and December. And this would leave the 12-month and 6-month average core PCE inflation around 2.6 percent and 2.4 percent, respectively. These rates are lower than where they stood in January 2024, which is good, but progress has been slower than I expected on reducing inflation to our 2 percent target.
    As a policymaker, I rely on these data to help me judge how close we are to meeting our inflation target. And I’m thinking hard about how to interpret these recent numbers because there seems to be some pattern over the past few years of higher inflation readings at the start of the year. This pattern brings into question whether the inflation data have “residual seasonality,” which means that statisticians have not fully corrected for some apparent seasonal fluctuations in some prices. Many firms reset their prices at the beginning of each year, and the Commerce Department tries to factor this in, but even after this adjustment, there is a consensus among economists that some seasonality remains. Incidentally, this probably isn’t just a problem in January. Some recently updated research by the Fed staff shows that inflation in the first months of the year has been higher than in the second half for 16 of the last 22 years.3 I’m alert to this issue and will watch the data over the next few months to evaluate if we are having what looks like a repeat of high first quarter inflation data that could be followed by lower readings later in the year.
    Before I get to my outlook for monetary policy, I want to address a topic of some debate recently, which is the divergence between long-term interest rates and the FOMC’s policy rate since we started cutting rates in September. While the FOMC has reduced the policy rate 100 basis points since then, yields on the benchmark 10-year Treasury security have increased by a noticeable amount. In theory, longer-term rates should follow the expected path of the overnight policy rate set by the FOMC. But this relationship is based on the classic economic assumption of ceteris paribus, or “all other factors remaining constant.” The 10-year Treasury security trades in a deep, liquid global market, and its yield is affected by a variety of factors other than the path of the policy rate. This means that all other factors are not constant and that the 10-year Treasury yield may not follow the federal funds rate.
    Perhaps the most famous example of the divergence of market interest rates and policy rates began in the mid 2000’s. The FOMC was tightening monetary policy from 2004 to 2006 and raised the policy rate 425 basis points. Over that time, Treasury yields barely moved. This was so surprising that Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan referred to it as a “conundrum.” At about the same time, future Chair Ben Bernanke identified what he called a “global savings glut” that was pushing up foreign demand for Treasury securities and putting downward pressure on yields. Over time, this has come to be seen as a significant factor for the conundrum then and as a factor for low Treasury yields subsequently. This example is just to illustrate that the 10-year Treasury yield may not respond to the policy rate as expected because of a variety of factors that are beyond the control of the FOMC.
    So, what does my economic outlook mean for monetary policy? The labor market is balanced and remarkably resilient. If you want an example of a stable labor market with employment at its maximum level, it looks a lot like where we are right now. On the other side of the FOMC’s mandate, inflation is still meaningfully above our target, and progress has been excruciatingly slow over the last year. This tells me that we should currently have a restrictive setting of policy, as we do—to continue to move inflation down to our goal—but that setting should be getting closer to neutral as inflation moves closer to 2 percent and should allow the labor market to remain in a good place.
    So for now, I believe a pause in rate cuts is appropriate. Assuming the labor market continues to be in rough balance, I can wait and see if the higher inflation readings in January moderate, as they have in the past couple of years. If so, I’ll have to decide if this reflects residual seasonality that will go away later in the year and if the underlying trend in inflation is toward 2 percent, or if there is a different issue holding up inflation and how that may play out. Whichever case it may be, the data are not supporting a reduction in the policy rate at this time. But if 2025 plays out like 2024, rate cuts would be appropriate at some point this year.
    And while we are waiting on data to understand how the economy is moving relative to our objectives, we will learn more about Administration policies. My baseline view is that any imposition of tariffs will only modestly increase prices and in a non-persistent manner. So I favor looking through these effects when setting monetary policy to the best of our ability. Of course, I concede that the effects of tariffs could be larger than I anticipate, depending on how large they are and how they are implemented. But we also need to remember that it is possible that other policies under discussion could have positive supply effects and put downward pressure on inflation. At the end of the day, the data should be guiding our policy action—not speculation about what could happen. And if the incoming data supports further rate cuts or staying on pause, then we should do so regardless of how much clarity we have on what policies the Administration adopts. Waiting for economic uncertainty to dissipate is a recipe for policy paralysis.

    1. The views expressed here are my own and are not necessarily those of my colleagues on the Federal Reserve Board or the Federal Open Market Committee. Return to text
    2. See my March 2022 speech for a discussion of how the Federal Reserve oversees financial stability and macroeconomic stability using different tools. Speech by Governor Waller on the economic outlook – Federal Reserve Board. Return to text
    3. For a fuller discussion of residual seasonality in inflation data, see Ekaterina Peneva and Nadia Sadée (2019), “Residual Seasonality in Core Consumer Price Inflation: An Update,” FEDS Notes (Washington: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 12). Return to text

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-Evening Report: Cook Islanders march in Avarua against Mark Brown government

    By Caleb Fotheringham, RNZ Pacific journalist, in Avarua, Rarotonga

    More than 400 people have taken to the streets to protest against Cook Islands Prime Minister Mark Brown’s recent decisions, which have led to a diplomatic spat with New Zealand.

    The protest, led by Opposition MP and Cook Islands United Party leader Teariki Heather, has taken place outside the Cook Islands Parliament in Avarua — a day after Brown returned from China.

    Protesters have come out with placards, stating: “Stay connected with New Zealand.”

    The protest in Avarua today.    Video: RNZ

    Some government ministers have been standing outside Parliament, including Foreign Minister Tingika Elikana.

    Heather said he was present at the rally to how how much Cook Islanders cared about the relationship with New Zealand and valued the New Zealand passport.

    He has apologised to the New Zealand government on behalf of the Cook Islands government.

    Leader of the opposition and Democratic Party leader Tina Browne said she wanted the local passport to be off the table “forever and ever”.

    “We have no problem with our government going and seeking assistance,” she said.

    “We do have a problem when it is risking our sovereignty, risking our relationship with New Zealand.”

    This article is republished under a community partnership agreement with RNZ.

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI Australia: ACCC proposes to authorise Virgin Australia and Qatar Airways integrated alliance

    Source: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission

    The ACCC is proposing to grant authorisation to Virgin Australia and Qatar Airways, which will allow them to engage in cooperative conduct under an integrated alliance for five years.

    Virgin Australia and Qatar Airways are seeking authorisation to engage in an integrated alliance where Virgin Australia, in partnership with Qatar Airways, will commence 28 new weekly return services between Doha and Perth, Brisbane, Sydney and Melbourne.

    Under the proposed arrangements, Virgin Australia would use Qatar Airways’ aircraft and crew to operate the new services. This is known in the aviation industry as ‘wet lease’ arrangements.

    The ACCC considers that the proposed cooperative conduct is likely to result in public benefits and is unlikely to result in any public detriment.

    “We consider that the proposed cooperative conduct would likely result in several public benefits including providing enhanced products and services for air travellers which would include increased choice of international flights, with additional connectivity, convenience and loyalty program benefits for consumers,” ACCC Commissioner Anna Brakey said.

    The new air services are subject to final regulatory approvals by the ACCC and other government bodies. The ACCC is now seeking feedback on this draft determination before it makes a final decision.

    The ACCC granted interim authorisation to Virgin Australia and Qatar Airways on 29 November 2024 to enable them to commence marketing and selling the new Australia-Doha services.

    When granting interim authorisation, the ACCC accepted a court-enforceable undertaking from both airlines which ensures that if any of the necessary final regulatory approvals are not granted, then customers who have booked the proposed new services will be given the option of a refund or re-accommodation on a suitable alternative flight at no additional charge and would be compensated for any reasonably foreseeable costs.

    A number of interested parties have since raised concerns with the ACCC that the proposed cooperative conduct would circumvent Australian workforce laws and regulations, and that the lack of time limits on the use of Qatar-based crew to operate the new services will have negative implications for the Australian aviation workforce.

    “We consider that Virgin Australia is unlikely to commence operating long-haul international services between Australia and the Middle East on a stand-alone basis in the next five years,” Ms Brakey said.

    “In those circumstances, we do not consider that there is likely to be a material detrimental impact on the Australian aviation workforce as a result of the conduct.”

    Under the proposed arrangements Velocity Frequent Flyer members will continue to be able to earn and redeem Velocity points on Singapore Airlines operated services globally, including to and from Europe, the Middle East and Africa. Virgin Australia’s arrangements with South African Airways and Virgin Atlantic would be unchanged. The ACCC is seeking submissions in response to the draft determination by 7 March 2025 before making its final determination.

    Further information about this application, the ACCC’s indicative timeline, and how to make a submission is available on the ACCC’s public register.

    Notes to editors

    ACCC authorisation provides statutory protection from court action for conduct by competitors that might otherwise raise concerns under the competition provisions of the Competition and Consumer Act.

    Broadly, the ACCC may grant an authorisation when it is satisfied that the public benefit from the conduct outweighs any public detriment.

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Growth in demand for domestic flights outstrips seating capacity, leading to fuller flights

    Source: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission

    Virgin Australia and Jetstar reported strong passenger demand growth throughout most of 2024, which continued into the Christmas period, the ACCC’s latest Domestic Airline Competition report has found.

    Compared to December 2023, the number of domestic passengers flown by Virgin Australia in December 2024 increased by 15.8 per cent, while Jetstar’s passengers grew by 11.2 per cent. The number of passengers flown by Qantas increased by 3.2 per cent over the same period.

    “Despite some airlines increasing their seating capacity throughout the year, this was outstripped by the growth in passenger numbers, leading to fuller flights,” ACCC Commissioner Anna Brakey said.

    The report found that flights were fuller than they have been for some time. In November 2024, flights on services between metropolitan cities were 90.4 per cent full. This was the highest rate recorded since at least January 2019, the earliest month for which the ACCC has data.

    “While we recognise that delivery delays for new aircraft have presented significant challenges, we encourage all airlines to find other ways to increase their seating capacity to cater to the growing passenger demand.”

    Cancellation rates improve but flight delays continue

    The industry cancellation rate improved in December 2024, when 1.8 per cent of flights were cancelled. This was the third time in four months that the cancellation rate was better than the long-term average (2.2 per cent).

    The improved cancellation rate is primarily associated with Virgin Australia, which cancelled just 0.6 per cent of flights in December 2024. Qantas had the highest cancellation rate in December 2024, at 2.7 per cent.

    “Flight cancellations have been a real concern for passengers since the pandemic, so it is pleasing to see the improved performance in recent months by some airlines,” Ms Brakey said.

    “Virgin Australia, in particular, has reduced the frequency of cancellations across its network.”

    Airline cancellation rates – December 2022 to December 2024

    Source: BITRE, On-time performance time series – December 2024. Qantas figures include QantasLink and Virgin Australia figures include VARA.

    Note: A flight is regarded as a cancellation if it is cancelled or rescheduled less than 7 days prior to its scheduled departure time.

    While travellers experienced fewer cancellations, they continued to face flight delays, with the on-time arrival rate across all airlines being 74.7 per cent in December 2024.

    Rex had the most reliable on-time performance in December 2024, when 75.9 per cent of its flights arrived on time. Jetstar reported the worst on-time performance with 73.3 per cent of flights arriving on time.

    Airfares stabilise following a peak over October and November

    Average airfares across all fare types stabilised in December 2024 and were 3.0 per cent lower than what they were in December 2023. The fall in average revenue per passenger in December was more pronounced on major city routes (-4.4 per cent) than regional (-0.4 per cent) and remote (-2.3 per cent) routes.

    “Travellers had some relief from high airfares in December, after school holidays and other factors pushed up the average price of domestic travel in October and November,” Ms Brakey said.

    “The reduction in airfares is likely to have primarily benefitted business travellers, as high demand for leisure travel over the Christmas period often leads to a spike in the price of ‘best discount’ tickets.”

    Index of real average fare revenue per passenger – December 2019 to December 2024

    Source: ACCC calculations using data from the ABS and data collected by the ACCC from Bonza (up to March 2024), Jetstar, Qantas, Rex and Virgin Australia.

    Note: (1) Average revenue per passenger includes both economy and business fare revenue. It excludes data associated with ancillaries, such as baggage fees, fees for seat selection and food and drink sold on board. (2) Data has been adjusted for inflation using ABS CPI quarterly data up to December 2024. (3) Grey bars indicate December and Easter holiday periods.

    Changes to domestic airline competition over the past 30 years

    This quarter’s report includes an analysis of the state of competition in Australia’s domestic airline sector over the past 30 years.

    The industry’s competitive landscape has fluctuated throughout this time, and the report highlights how consumers have benefited during periods when there was stronger competition.

    Timeline of domestic aviation since 1990

    The report observed fierce competition in the early 2010s, when Virgin Blue rebranded to Virgin Australia to better compete with Qantas for business travellers. During this time, both airlines competed vigorously for market share by raising capacity and reducing airfares.

    At the same time, Tiger and Jetstar competed for the budget leisure customer segment of the domestic market.

    This competitive rivalry between the airlines declined in the mid-2010s, when Virgin Australia and Qantas abandoned their price war after incurring significant financial losses.

    At around the same time, service reliability began to worsen, as the average industry cancellation rate grew significantly over the next decade. In 2014, the average cancellation rate was above 2.0 per cent for just one month of the year, compared to nine months out of 12 in 2024.

    “Improved competition in the domestic airline industry is essential to ensure consumers can enjoy lower airfares, better service quality and more choice,” Ms Brakey said.

    Background

    On 6 November 2023, the Treasurer directed the ACCC to recommence domestic air passenger transport monitoring. Under this direction the ACCC is to monitor prices, costs and profits relating to the supply of domestic air passenger transport services for a period of three years and to report on its monitoring at least once every quarter.

    The ACCC collects data from Jetstar, Qantas, Rex and Virgin Australia for monitoring purposes.

    Rex entered voluntary administration in July 2024 but continues to operate its regional routes. The government is guaranteeing regional flight bookings for Rex customers throughout the voluntary administration process.

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI Security: Readout: Attorney General Bondi Briefed on National Security, Anti-Human Trafficking Efforts at Port of Tampa

    Source: United States Attorneys General 6

    Today, Attorney General Pam Bondi toured the Port of Tampa Bay – the largest port in Florida – and received a briefing from the Port’s CEO, Paul Anderson.

    Attorney General Bondi and Port Leadership discussed the Port’s important role in safeguarding Floridians and the American people as a key port of entry into this US. They also discussed the vital role that government plays in helping protect national security at ports.

    Other topics discussed included Port Tampa Bay’s advancements in protecting against foreign threats to physical and cyber security infrastructure, securing the Panama Canal, and ongoing coordination with the American Association of Port Authorities (AAPA) and the Coalition for America’s Gateways and Trade Corridors (CAGTC).

    Attorney General Bondi closed the briefing by thanking all in attendance for their important work on protecting the American people, safeguarding our national security, and encouraging the flow of commerce.

    Attorney General Bondi concluded by stating “Our ports are often the first line of defense in protecting Americans from national security threats like human trafficking, drug smuggling, and cybercrime. It was an honor to spend time with Paul Anderson and his team, who are collaborating closely with government partners and doing incredible work to protect Floridians and our Nation in my hometown of Tampa.”

    Participants:

    Paul Anderson, President and CEO of Port Tampa Bay

    Charles Klug, Principal Counsel of Port Tampa Bay

    Ken Washington, Vice President and Chief Information Officer of Port Tampa Bay

    Mark Dubina, Vice President of Security of Port Tampa Bay

    Laura Lenhart, Vice President of Government Affairs of Port Tampa Bay

    Sue Bai, Assistant Deputy Attorney General for National Security

    Catharine Cypher, Deputy Chief of Staff, Department of Justice

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Submissions: Singapore/Malaysia: Imminent execution of Pannir Selvam Pranthaman must be halted – Amnesty International

    Source: Amnesty International

    Amnesty International Malaysia is greatly alarmed at the scheduling of the execution of Malaysian Pannir Selvam Pranthaman in Singapore on Thursday 20 February.

    The violations of human rights protections seen in his case would render the execution arbitrary and unlawful under international law and standards. We join his family and many others in urging the authorities of Singapore to immediately halt plans to carry out the execution; and the Government of Malaysia to make every effort to intervene and help spare Pannir Selvam Pranthaman’s life.

    Chiara Sangiorgio, Amnesty International’s death penalty expert, said: “The alarming pace of executions carried out in Singapore since October shows a chilling determination on the part of the Government to pursue hangings. This includes for offences, such as transporting drugs in Pannir’s case, that must not be punished by death under international restrictions on the use of the death penalty. This is beyond reproachable and leaves Singapore among a handful of countries known to have executed for drug-related offences in recent years.

    “We urge the Singapore government to immediately end its unlawful resort to the death penalty and immediately establish a moratorium on all executions as a first critical step towards abolition.

    “We also urge the international community to step up pressure on the government of Singapore and help prevent yet another unlawful execution from taking place. There is still time to change course and prevent this cruel and senseless execution from happening.”

    Pannir Selvam Pranthaman was convicted of importing into Singapore 51.84g of diamorphine (heroin) and was sentenced to the mandatory death penalty in 2017. The judge

    found that he was a “courier”, involved only with the transport of the prohibited substance. While under sentence of death in Singapore, Pannir has shown great resilience and channeled his energy into creativity, writing heartfelt songs and poems that speak of the anguish, hope, and prayers of those on death row, many of which have been shared with the public through the Sebaran Kasih NGO founded by his sister, Angelia Pranthaman.

    Use of the death penalty unlawful and arbitrary under international law and standards

    While we oppose the death penalty unconditionally and in all cases, we are deeply concerned that the numerous violations of human rights safeguards present in Pannir’s case would render his execution arbitrary and unlawful under international human rights law and standards. He was sentenced to death for drug-related offenses, which do not meet the threshold of the “most serious crimes” to which the use of this punishment must be restricted under international human rights law and standards. The death penalty was also imposed as a mandatory sentence, contrary to international law and standards, which meant that the judge could not take into account the circumstances of the offence or of his background.

    Because of a unique feature in Singapore’s system, he was found to be a “courier”, but as the Prosecution did not provide him with a Certificate of Substantial Assistance, the judge had no option but to impose the mandatory sentence of hanging. This process violates the right to a fair trial, as it placed the decision between a life-or-death sentence in the hands of the prosecution–which is not a neutral party in the trial and should not have such powers, and as it breaks down the clear separation that must exist between prosecution and the court.

    Additionally, the conviction was reached with reliance on a legal presumption of knowledge of the drugs under the Misuse of Drugs Act. When these legal presumptions are invoked, the burden of proof is shifted onto the defendant to be rebutted to the higher legal standard of “on a balance of probabilities”. Legal presumptions of guilt violate the right to be presumed innocent –a peremptory norm of customary international law – and other fair trial guarantees under international human rights law that mandate that the burden of proving the charge rests on the prosecution.

    Urgent need for interventions from Malaysia to stop the execution

    As we are gathered in Parliament today to highlight Pannir’s case, we reflect on the many flaws and arbitrariness of the death penalty, as well as the heavier burden that it poses on those from disadvantaged backgrounds. These arguments echo those that dominated debates on the repeal of the mandatory death penalty in this same building just two years ago and triggered a process that has transformed the use of the death penalty in our country. We must harness this progress to advocate against the use of this cruel punishment everywhere – the death penalty does not make us safer.

    As the current Chair of ASEAN and a neighbouring country with strong ties to Singapore, the government of Malaysia must urgently intervene in Pannir’s case. With effectively just more than two days before the execution, the Government must not to spare any efforts to stop this unlawful and arbitrary execution from taking place, as a first critical step.

    Amnesty International has been gathering appeals globally on behalf of Pannir Selvam. In the last four months, Amnesty International Malaysia has collected over 1000 petitions signed by civil society and the members of public asking the Malaysian government to urgently intervene to secure the commutation of Pannir Selvam’s death sentence.

    Relentless pursuit of executions

    Between 1 October 2024 and 7 February 2025, the authorities of Singapore carried out nine executions, including eight of individuals convicted of drug trafficking. Singapore is one of only five countries where Amnesty International confirmed drug related executions in 2023.

    As of today, 113 countries have abolished the death penalty for all crimes and 144 are abolitionist in law or practice. We renew our appeal to the Singapore authorities to immediately halt Pannir’s execution and establish a moratorium on all executions, as first critical steps towards full abolition of the death penalty.    

    MIL OSI – Submitted News

  • MIL-OSI USA: February 17th, 2025 Heinrich to N.M. Legislature: “New Mexicans Are Counting on Us to Deliver”

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for New Mexico Martin Heinrich

    SANTA FE, N.M. – Today, U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.) addressed a Joint Session of the New Mexico Legislature at the Roundhouse, New Mexico’s State Capitol in Santa Fe.

    “Serving you and representing this great state in the halls of our nation’s Capitol is a privilege that I will never take for granted,” said Heinrich. “The same goes for the mandate New Mexicans entrusted me with this last election: To deliver for the people and places of our great state. To fight for the freedoms, safety, opportunities, and dreams of our families, our communities, and our country. I will never shrink from that work.”

    PHOTO: U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.) delivers remarks to the New Mexico Legislature, February 17, 2025.

    Heinrich started his remarks by calling for elected leaders to unify around delivering for New Mexicans: “I have always been struck by New Mexicans’ acute understanding of what it means to put individual differences aside in service to the greater good. In our most challenging times, New Mexicans show up for each other. From the darkest days of the Hermit’s Peak/Calf Canyon fire to last year’s flooding in Roswell, from North to South, and East to West, New Mexicans understand our shared commitment to one another.”

    Heinrich promised: “Let me be clear: My commitment, my only commitment, is to you, New Mexico. I will work — day and night — to defend the programs, funding, resources, and public lands our communities, local economies, and families rely on. Because, as elected leaders, we serve all of our constituents, from our neighbors and closest family friends to those in our community we’ve never met, or who disagree with us on nearly every issue. All of these New Mexicans are counting on us – all of us here in this room – to lead, to care, to keep our communities safe. Simply put, they are counting on us to deliver.”

    Heinrich commended the Legislature for its successful efforts to stand up permanent funds that generate revenues now and into the future — from the Early Childhood Trust Fund to the Land of Enchantment Legacy Fund — and praised legislators’ efforts in the current session to pass bills to reduce crime, expand behavioral health services, scale investments in work-based learning opportunities, career and technical education, and the Outdoor Equity Fund, establish a statewide water quality permitting program, and reform New Mexico’s Game and Fish Department and Game Commission.

    Heinrich concluded: “Working together, we can deliver the future our kids deserve. We can fight for their freedoms: the freedom to grow up to make their own health care decisions, the freedom to marry who they love, the freedom to be who they are, the freedom to be safe in their classrooms, and the freedom to pursue a fair shot at success. Let’s also keep working to protect our kids’ clean air, clean water, and public lands that will sustain their communities, economies, and sense of identity as New Mexicans. We can uphold this Democracy, commit to the Republic set out in our Constitution, and comply with our oaths of service to put ‘We the People’ first.”

    Below are Heinrich’s full remarks as prepared for delivery:

    Speaker Martinez, Senate President Pro Tempore Stewart, Lieutenant Governor Morales, members of the New Mexico Senate and House of Representatives.

    It is an absolute honor to be here with you this afternoon. 

    I am very pleased to be joined by my wife, Julie, several honored guests, and two of my colleagues and friends in the New Mexico Congressional Delegation, Senator Ben Ray Luján and Congresswoman Teresa Leger Fernández.

    I stand before you, today, at the start of my third term in the United States Senate.

    Serving you and representing this amazing state in the halls of our nation’s Capitol is a privilege that I will never take for granted.

    The same goes for the mandate New Mexicans entrusted me with this last election:

    To deliver for the people and the places of our incredible state.

    To fight for the freedoms, safety, opportunities, and dreams of our families, our communities, and our country.

    I will never shrink from that work.

    And make no mistake:

    Republican leadership in the White House and in the United States House and Senate will have very real impacts on our state and on individual New Mexicans.

    Some of you will agree with those, and others won’t agree with any of them.

    The same will probably be true of many of our constituents.

    Still, I have always been struck by New Mexicans’ acute understanding of what it means to put individual differences aside in service to the greater good.

    In our most challenging times, New Mexicans look out for each other.

    From the darkest days of the Hermit’s Peak/Calf Canyon Fire to last year’s flooding in Roswell.

    From North to South, and East to West, New Mexicans understand our shared commitment to one another.

    So let me be clear: My commitment, my only commitment, is to you, New Mexico.

    And I will lift up your voices in the most powerful halls of our Republic.

    Whether you are Mark from Albuquerque, a polio survivor who wrote to me about the life and death consequences of vaccines,

    Gary, a retired Air Force intelligence officer in Tularosa who wrote to me about the importance of defending our national security,

    Or Ashleigh from Truth or Consequences, a school social worker who called my office with deep concerns about how cuts at the Department of Education would impact her students.

    I will elevate New Mexicans’ voices and demand action, accountability, and the future our kids deserve.

    And I will work–day and night–to defend the programs, funding, resources, and public lands our communities, local economies, and families rely on.

    Because, as elected leaders, we serve all of our constituents.

    From our neighbors and closest family members to those in our community we’ve never met, or even who disagree with us on nearly every issue.

    All of these New Mexicans are counting on us here in this room – to lead, to give a damn, to keep our communities safe.

    Simply put, they are counting on us to deliver.

    And that requires grappling with difficult decisions.

    It requires solving real problems that impact real people.

    And it requires us to bridge the gap between what is, and what is possible.

    Always with New Mexicans front and center.

    You know, we live in an era of loyalty pledges.

    From the right and the left, frankly.

    From Presidents and from rank-and-file activists.

    From one elected leader to another, I want to implore you NOT to sign pledges, but to solve problems.

    Our only loyalty pledge should be to this incredible state and to this country, and the incredible people who call it home.

    Whether it’s to protect our nation from foreign terrorist threats or to just provide the support our kids need to learn to read —

    Whether it’s fixing roads that countless New Mexicans drive on every day or cutting crime in our communities –New Mexicans expect us to put them first, and we must.

    They should be able to count on us – at the federal, state, and local level – to ensure their roads, kids, food, water, and air are safe.

    And that includes ensuring that the agencies charged with doing this work are staffed, funded, and functional.

    Whether that’s at New Mexico’s Children, Youth and Families Department or the United States Environmental Protection Agency.

    Here, in the Land of Enchantment, we want our kids to be happy and healthy, with a fair shot at success, no matter what bathroom they use, how they dress, what color their hair is, or whether they have an IEP.

    We want New Mexico women to know that we trust them to make their own health care decisions, AND we will work to get them the quality health care they deserve in their own communities.

    We want New Mexico’s immigrant families to know we see them, we value them, and we will not turn our backs on them.

    And we want hardworking folks to know that “lowering costs,” “creating jobs,” and “growing the middle class” aren’t just campaign slogans.

    They require action.

    These are the pledges that we must work to deliver on.

    So let’s talk a little bit about what it means to put New Mexicans first:

    Your work to stand up permanent funds that generate revenues now and into the future—from the Early Childhood Trust Fund to the Land of Enchantment Legacy Fund—these put New Mexicans first.

    Your work to make our communities safer, increase access to mental health care, and tackle substance abuse puts New Mexicans first.

    When it comes to public safety, my own strategy has been straightforward: Solve crimes, support survivors, hold criminals accountable.

    But too many of our law enforcement agencies don’t have the basic tools they need to solve crimes.

    And when crimes go unsolved, those who commit them keep committing them.

    Since joining the Senate Appropriations Committee, I have worked to deliver federal resources to our partners in law enforcement.

    I’ve been able to appropriate funds for new ballistics testing machines in Las Cruces, Farmington, Gallup, and Roswell, so we can solve the first gun crime before a second one is committed.

    I’ve helped our local law enforcement purchase technology that detects gunshots and runs rapid DNA checks.

    This technology can mean solving a crime before it’s too late.

    In some cases, this may even be the difference between life and death for the victims of gun crimes.

    And I’ve helped local law enforcement purchase equipment to detect fentanyl and other illegal drugs, so they can hold drug traffickers accountable and get this poison out of our communities.

    But more is needed.

    If your car is stolen, the person who stole it should be found and held accountable.

    If your home is broken into, the person who did it should be found and held accountable.

    If your daughter is assaulted, the person who did it should be found and held accountable.

    It’s simple, but right now that’s not happening in far too many cases.

    We can all do better on this front.

    And I urge all of you to use your leadership to deliver strong public safety legislation that will make this happen.

    As many of you recognize, it does not have to be a choice between improving public safety and supporting our communities’ mental health care.

    We can walk and chew gum at the same time.

    I am speaking with a little bit of experience here.

    After the horrific mass shooting in Uvalde, I sat down with colleagues from both sides of the aisle, and we crafted what became the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act.

    That legislation tackled firearm safety, increased criminal penalties on firearm offenses like gun trafficking, AND it provided federal investments in community and school-based mental health services.

    Silver Consolidated Schools was the first school district in New Mexico to receive a $6 million School-Based Mental Health Services Grant under that law.

    These federal resources have helped the district hire psychologists, counselors, and other mental health professionals at all of their schools.

    These types of school-based mental health services are an essential piece of our overall behavioral health puzzle.

    If we could find this bipartisan pathway to improve public safety and mental health care at the federal level, I have every faith that you can do it here, too. 

    And, after last week’s votes on behavioral health in the Senate and the crime package in the House, you have created some much-needed momentum.

    Thank you.

    I applaud the Senate for your work to resource and restructure our state’s behavioral health system.

    We all know it’s a lot easier to tear down a system over a couple of years than it is to rebuild that system.

    And I applaud the House for negotiating and passing a crime package that takes on pressing issues in our communities from fentanyl to auto-theft, to gun crimes.

    Let’s keep this momentum going.

    There’s so much more that can and must be done at the state and federal levels to support the victims of crimes, and to support law enforcement as they work to hold accountable the perpetrators of crimes.

    Because, when it comes to making our communities safer, supporting victims and solving crime is a common ground we should all be able to support.

    And, in fact, it’s one our communities are depending on us to get right.

    We all want New Mexico to be the best possible place for our kids to grow up, to raise their families, and to build careers and families in their home communities.

    That means not only taking our crime epidemic seriously, but it also means investing in our kids, from cradle to career.

    The investments that this Legislature and New Mexico voters unlocked two years ago are helping our state lead the nation in making high-quality early childhood education and childcare accessible to all of our families.

    In the last few years, you have given our public school educators the pay raises they have long deserved.

    And we are scaling up a statewide network of full-service community schools.

    All of these investments are already beginning to deliver results.

    When you account for state and federal investments in our kids, from Medicaid to the state child tax credit, we don’t rank 50th in child poverty.

    We rank 17th.

    Better than the national average, not good enough, but we are far from finished.

    And I applaud you for looking to increase the child tax credit.

    This money will put resources right back into the pockets of New Mexico families who will invest it in their children.

    We should also be expanding apprenticeships and paid internships as early as high school.

    That’s how we will prepare the next generation of New Mexicans for career success.

    Here with me are Arnaldo Miramontes and Sandy Juarez, two young people who have found their career paths thanks to highly successful programs in our state.

    While in high school, Sandy had a paid internship at Christus Saint Vincent Hospital through Future Focused Education.

    She got hands-on experience in phlebotomy and now she’s preparing at Santa Fe Community College for a career in health care.

    Arnaldo is in his fifth and final year as an apprentice with the UA Local 412, and on his way to an incredible career with licenses in both plumbing and pipefitting.

    Both will be meeting demands in high needs industries right here in New Mexico.

    I encourage all of us to continue investing in career and technical education, paid internships and apprenticeships, and work-based learning opportunities for our young people.

    As I work to pass my Apprenticeship Pathways Act in the Senate, I hope that you will continue to identify targeted, sustained funding at the state level.

    We should look at everything from offering credit, to restructuring our school days to help students get more hands-on experiences in the workplace.

    This is critical to successfully building the workforce of the future.

    Finally, I hope you will continue to grow our state’s Outdoor Equity Fund and the opportunities it has unlocked for so many young New Mexicans.

    I am so proud that New Mexico is grounding more of our kids in the incredible lands that are their American birthright.

    Before I was ever an elected official, I was a guide and an educator. 

    And I saw time and again the remarkable difference it makes when children and teens spent time in the outdoors.

    I’ve invited as my guest today Ruben Apodaca a twelfth grader with the Honey Badger Conservation Crew at the Albuquerque Sign Language Academy.

    I visited their beekeeping and honey harvesting operation last year, which is receiving critical support from the Outdoor Equity Fund.

    Students who are deaf, hard of hearing, and with disabilities are managing their own beehives and bringing the honey products from those hives to market.

    This kind of hands-on experience is deeply valuable.

    I strongly encourage you to continue making transformational opportunities like this possible by scaling up the Outdoor Equity Fund.

    Finally, as we invest in the people of this great state, we must also invest in the lands, waters, and wildlife that are the fabric that we build our identities upon.

    Most of you have heard of the Supreme Court case that stripped federal protections from 90% of New Mexico’s surface waters.

    New Mexicans want our water and our watersheds protected.

    My guest Mark Allison from New Mexico Wild is one of the folks here advocating for two bills that would establish essential state-level protection of these waters that are now void of federal stewardship.

    I am also encouraged by the proposals that are moving forward to reform our state’s outdated and underfunded Department of Game and Fish and Game Commission.

    Brittany Fallon from Western Resource Advocates and Jesse Deubel from the New Mexico Wildlife Federation are here with me today.

    They are advocating for reforms that will ensure wildlife management decisions are based on biology rather than politics.

    These reforms account for the voices of farmers, ranchers, hunters, anglers, biologists, and wildlife conservationists.

    And they also include the sustainable funding needed to help our Game and Fish Department effectively do their work.

    There is nothing I enjoy more than packing into a spike camp during elk season.

    Our wild game has literally been the primary protein on my family’s dinner table for the last 20 years.

    So, I know full well the importance of the work needed to manage New Mexico’s wildlife.

    We need a 21st century wildlife conservation approach that leverages resources to manage all of our wild creatures—not just our game animals.

    We also need to make our Game Commission more representative and more accountable.

    And we need to make sure that we are leveraging the biology and resources to protect fish and wildlife so that they never become listed as threatened or endangered.

    While we address all of these needs for our communities, we must stay focused on our true North Star.

    That’s our kids.

    Working together, we can deliver the future our kids deserve.

    We can fight for their freedoms:

    The freedom to grow up to make their own health care decisions,

    The freedom to marry who they love,

    The freedom to be who they are,

    The freedom to feel safe in their classrooms,

    And the freedom to pursue a fair shot at success.

    Let’s also keep working to protect our kids’ clean air, clean water, and public lands that will sustain their communities, economies, and sense of identity as New Mexicans.

    We can uphold this Democracy, recommit to the Republic set out in our Constitution, and comply with our oaths of service to put “We the People” first.

    That doesn’t mean we will always agree on how to get that done.

    In fact, I’m pretty confident we will always find something to disagree on.

    Even if it’s just “red or green.”

    But if we always put “We the People” first,

    If we always pledge our loyalty to the people we serve, above all else:

    We will deliver the future our kids deserve.

    Thank you.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Consumer NZ survey reveals New Zealanders face rising healthcare concerns amid ongoing financial uncertainty

    Source: Consumer NZ

    The latest Consumer NZ Sentiment Tracker results reveal that New Zealanders continue to grapple with financial uncertainty and growing concerns about healthcare services.  

    39% of respondents identified healthcare as a key issue, up from 27% in October 2024 and 23% a year ago.

    Healthcare is now the second-biggest concern, growing rapidly, with increased anxiety about the healthcare system’s ability to meet demand, and concerns about the affordability and quality of healthcare services. This rise sees the issues of crime, climate and broader economic stability dropping in importance since the last survey, in October 2024.

    Health themes that emerged from our research included concerns about access and wait times, cost, staff shortages and burnout, resourcing and infrastructure, inequities, as well as the quality of healthcare services.

    Healthcare concerns have risen across all age groups, but older New Zealanders remain most vocal, with 65% of those aged 70 years and over identifying healthcare as a top issue, up from 46% in October 2024 and 41% a year ago.

    What we heard
    “So much under funding is making the health system worse, I’m going to have to get private medical insurance.” – Female, 35-39 years, Otago
     
    “That ALL people requiring healthcare receive it in a timely affordable manner. Seeing ones GP should be affordable for all to prevent costly issues later.”
    – Female, 70 years and over, Hawke’s Bay
     
    “Concerned about the standard or availability of healthcare being a postcode lottery. Insufficient numbers of GPs. Unsubsidised dental care rules out this important health care option for a lot of adults. Healthcare workers are not well paid and are put in dangerous situations.” – Female, 55-59 years, Wellington

    Healthcare at Consumer NZ
    Jon Duffy, Consumer chief executive, says the data is showing the healthcare system is failing to meet consumer expectations.

    “Given the central role the health system plays in all of our lives, it is concerning to see such a rapid rise in consumer anxiety about the system’s ability to meet even basic needs.”

    “We are committed to covering and answering big questions about consumer interaction with a range of healthcare topics to support better wellbeing outcomes.”

    Cost of living still the top concern
    Cost of living is still the top issue (64%), with financial pressures remaining a significant concern, while anxiety about unemployment has risen from 9% a year ago to 15%.

    Declining trust signals broader discontent
    Trust has declined across various sectors, with notable decreases in trust in the government (down 8 percentage points) and a 7-point drop in trust in the healthcare system.  

    About
    The Consumer NZ Sentiment Tracker is a quarterly survey that gathers insights from 1,000 New Zealanders, providing a snapshot of public opinion on key issues, including financial stability, consumer spending and trust.

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-OSI: Transocean Ltd. Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2024 Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

     

      Three months ended         Three months ended      
      December 31,    September 30,      sequential   December 31,       year-over-year
      2024   2024   change   2023   change
    (In millions, except per share amounts, percentages and backlog)                            
    Contract drilling revenues $ 952     $ 948     $ 4     $ 741     $ 211  
    Adjusted contract drilling revenues $ 952     $ 948     $ 4     $ 748     $ 204  
    Revenue efficiency (1)   93.5 %     94.5 %           97.0 %      
    Operating and maintenance expense $ 579     $ 563     $ (16 )   $ 569     $ (10 )
    Net income (loss) attributable to controlling interest $ 7     $ (494 )   $ 501     $ (104 )   $ 111  
    Basic earnings (loss) per share $ 0.01     $ (0.56 )   $ 0.57     $ (0.13 )   $ 0.14  
    Diluted loss per share $ (0.11 )   $ (0.58 )   $ 0.47     $ (0.13 )   $ 0.02  
                                 
    Adjusted EBITDA $ 323     $ 342     $ (19 )   $ 122     $ 201  
    Adjusted EBITDA margin   33.9 %     36.0 %           16.3 %      
    Adjusted net income (loss) $ 27     $ 64     $ (37 )   $ (74 )   $ 101  
    Adjusted diluted earnings (loss) per share $ (0.09 )   $     $ (0.09 )   $ (0.09 )   $  
                                 
                                 
    Backlog as of the February 2025 Fleet Status Report $ 8.3 billion                      
                                 

    STEINHAUSEN, Switzerland, Feb. 17, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Transocean Ltd. (NYSE: RIG) today reported net income attributable to controlling interest of $7 million, or loss of $0.11 per diluted share, for the three months ended December 31, 2024.

    Fourth quarter results included $20 million, $0.02 per diluted share, discrete tax items, net. After consideration of these unfavorable items, fourth quarter 2024 adjusted net income was $27 million, or loss of $0.09 per diluted share.

    Contract drilling revenues for the three months ended December 31, 2024, increased sequentially by $4 million to $952 million, primarily due to increased utilization for one rig that returned to work after undergoing a special periodic survey in the third quarter and higher reimbursement revenues, partially offset by lower revenue efficiency across the fleet.

    Operating and maintenance expense was $579 million, compared with $563 million in the prior quarter. The sequential increase was the result of higher in-service maintenance costs across our fleet, partially offset by a settlement with insurance carriers.

    General and administrative expense was $56 million, up from $47 million in the third quarter due primarily to increased legal and professional fees.

    Interest expense net of capitalized amounts was $152 million, compared to $154 million in the prior quarter, excluding the favorable adjustment of $61 million and $74 million in the fourth and third quarter, respectively, for the fair value of the bifurcated exchange feature related to the 4.625% exchangeable bonds. Interest income was $10 million, compared to $11 million in the prior quarter.

    The Effective Tax Rate(2) was 89.0%, up from 6.0% in the prior quarter. The increase was primarily due to higher income and increases in valuation allowance. The Effective Tax Rate excluding discrete items was 56.7% compared to 22.5% in the previous quarter.

    Cash provided by operating activities was $206 million during the fourth quarter of 2024, representing an increase of $12 million compared to the prior quarter. The sequential increase was primarily due to timing of interest payments and decreased payments for accounts payable, partially offset by reduced collections from customers.

    Fourth quarter 2024 capital expenditures of $29 million, compared to $58 million in the prior quarter, were related to capital upgrades for certain rigs in our fleet.

    “In 2024, we continued to advance our position as the technological leader in offshore drilling by, among other things, executing the first two 20K subsea completions in the history of the industry,” said Chief Executive Officer Jeremy Thigpen. “We also introduced and implemented other technologies that enhance our operational performances and further differentiate our fleet. This commitment to innovation, along with our reputation for delivering safe, reliable, and efficient operations, is clearly recognized by our customers, as demonstrated by the $2.4 billion in backlog we secured during the year.”

    Thigpen continued, “With industry-leading contract coverage well into 2026, our primary objective will be strong operational execution and an intense focus on cost control to ensure we maximize the conversion of our backlog to cash, enabling us to continue de-leveraging our balance sheet.”

    Full Year 2024

    For the year ended December 31, 2024, net loss attributable to controlling interest totaled $512 million, $0.76 per diluted share. Full year results included $458 million, $0.50 per diluted share, net unfavorable items as follows:

    • $755 million, $0.82 per diluted share, loss on impairment of assets; and
    • $5 million, $0.01 per diluted share, loss on impairment of our investments in unconsolidated affiliates; partially offset by,
    • $161 million, $0.18 per diluted share, gain on retirement of debt; and
    • $141 million, $0.15 per diluted share, related to discrete tax items, net.

    After consideration of these net unfavorable items, adjusted net loss for 2024 was $54 million, $0.26 per diluted share.

    Non-GAAP Financial Measures

    We present our operating results in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. (“U.S. GAAP”). We believe certain financial measures, such as Adjusted Contract Drilling Revenues, EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted Net Income, which are non-GAAP measures, provide users of our financial statements with supplemental information that may be useful in evaluating our operating performance. We believe that such non-GAAP measures, when read in conjunction with our operating results presented under U.S. GAAP, can be used to better assess our performance from period to period and relative to performance of other companies in our industry, without regard to financing methods, historical cost basis or capital structure. Such non-GAAP measures should be considered as a supplement to, and not as a substitute for, financial measures prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP.

    All non-GAAP measure reconciliations to the most comparative U.S. GAAP measures are displayed in quantitative schedules on the company’s website at: www.deepwater.com.

    About Transocean

    Transocean is a leading international provider of offshore contract drilling services for oil and gas wells. The company specializes in technically demanding sectors of the global offshore drilling business with a particular focus on ultra-deepwater and harsh environment drilling services, and operates the highest specification floating offshore drilling fleet in the world.

    Transocean owns or has partial ownership interests in and operates a fleet of 34 mobile offshore drilling units, consisting of 26 ultra-deepwater floaters and eight harsh environment floaters.

    For more information about Transocean, please visit: www.deepwater.com.

    Conference Call Information

    Transocean will conduct a teleconference starting at 9 a.m. EST, 3 p.m. CET, on Tuesday, February 18, 2025, to discuss the results. To participate, dial +1 785-424-1116 and refer to conference code 540196 approximately 15 minutes prior to the scheduled start time.

    The teleconference will be simulcast in a listen-only mode at: www.deepwater.com, by selecting Investors, News, and Webcasts. Supplemental materials that may be referenced during the teleconference will be available at: www.deepwater.com, by selecting Investors, Financial Reports.

    A replay of the conference call will be available after 12 p.m. EST, 6 p.m. CET, on Tuesday, February 18, 2025. The replay, which will be archived for approximately 30 days, can be accessed at +1 402-220-1152, passcode 540196. The replay will also be available on the company’s website.

    Forward-Looking Statements

    The statements described herein that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These statements could contain words such as “possible,” “intend,” “will,” “if,” “expect,” or other similar expressions. Forward-looking statements are based on management’s current expectations and assumptions, and are subject to inherent uncertainties, risks and changes in circumstances that are difficult to predict. As a result, actual results could differ materially from those indicated in these forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially include, but are not limited to, estimated duration of customer contracts, contract dayrate amounts, future contract commencement dates and locations, planned shipyard projects and other out-of-service time, sales of drilling units, timing of the company’s newbuild deliveries, operating hazards and delays, risks associated with international operations, actions by customers and other third parties, the fluctuation of current and future prices of oil and gas, the global and regional supply and demand for oil and gas, the intention to scrap certain drilling rigs, the success of our business following prior acquisitions, the effects of the spread of and mitigation efforts by governments, businesses and individuals related to contagious illnesses, and other factors, including those and other risks discussed in the company’s most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023, and in the company’s other filings with the SEC, which are available free of charge on the SEC’s website at: www.sec.gov. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize (or the other consequences of such a development worsen), or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those indicated or expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to the company or to persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by reference to these risks and uncertainties. You should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Each forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date of the particular statement, and we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that occur, or which we become aware of, after the date hereof, except as otherwise may be required by law.

    This press release, or referenced documents, do not constitute an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, any securities, and do not constitute an offering prospectus within the meaning of the Swiss Financial Services Act (“FinSA”) or advertising within the meaning of the FinSA. Investors must rely on their own evaluation of Transocean and its securities, including the merits and risks involved. Nothing contained herein is, or shall be relied on as, a promise or representation as to the future performance of Transocean.

    Notes

    (1) Revenue efficiency is defined as actual operating revenues, excluding revenues for contract terminations and reimbursements, for the measurement period divided by the maximum revenue calculated for the measurement period, expressed as a percentage. Maximum revenue is defined as the greatest amount of contract drilling revenues the drilling unit could earn for the measurement period, excluding revenues for incentive provisions, reimbursements and contract terminations. See the accompanying schedule entitled “Revenue Efficiency.”
    (2) Effective Tax Rate is defined as income tax expense or benefit divided by income or loss before income taxes. See the accompanying schedule entitled “Supplemental Effective Tax Rate Analysis.”
       

    Analyst Contact:
    Alison Johnson
    +1 713-232-7214

    Media Contact:
    Pam Easton
    +1 713-232-7647

    TRANSOCEAN LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
    (In millions, except per share data)
    (Unaudited)
                     
      Years ended December 31, 
      2024        2023        2022  
                     
    Contract drilling revenues $ 3,524     $ 2,832     $ 2,575  
                     
    Costs and expenses                
    Operating and maintenance   2,199       1,986       1,679  
    Depreciation and amortization   739       744       735  
    General and administrative   214       187       182  
        3,152       2,917       2,596  
                     
    Loss on impairment of assets   (772 )     (57 )      
    Loss on disposal of assets, net   (17 )     (183 )     (10 )
    Operating loss   (417 )     (325 )     (31 )
                     
    Other income (expense), net                
    Interest income   50       52       27  
    Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized   (362 )     (646 )     (561 )
    Gain (loss) on retirement of debt   161       (31 )     8  
    Other, net   45       9       (5 )
        (106 )     (616 )     (531 )
    Loss before income tax expense (benefit)   (523 )     (941 )     (562 )
    Income tax expense (benefit)   (11 )     13       59  
                     
    Net loss   (512 )     (954 )     (621 )
    Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest                
    Net loss attributable to controlling interest $ (512 )   $ (954 )   $ (621 )
                     
    Loss per share                
    Basic $ (0.60 )   $ (1.24 )   $ (0.89 )
    Diluted $ (0.76 )   $ (1.24 )   $ (0.89 )
                     
    Weighted-average shares outstanding                
    Basic   850       768       699  
    Diluted   925       768       699  
                           
    TRANSOCEAN LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
    (In millions, except share data)
    (Unaudited)
               
      December 31, 
      2024        2023  
    Assets          
    Cash and cash equivalents $ 560     $ 762  
    Accounts receivable, net   564       512  
    Materials and supplies, net   439       426  
    Assets held for sale   343       49  
    Restricted cash and cash equivalents   381       233  
    Other current assets   165       144  
    Total current assets   2,452       2,126  
               
    Property and equipment   22,417       23,875  
    Less accumulated depreciation   (6,586 )     (6,934 )
    Property and equipment, net   15,831       16,941  
    Contract intangible assets         4  
    Deferred tax assets, net   45       44  
    Other assets   1,043       1,139  
    Total assets $ 19,371     $ 20,254  
               
    Liabilities and equity          
    Accounts payable $ 255     $ 323  
    Accrued income taxes   31       23  
    Debt due within one year   686       370  
    Other current liabilities   691       681  
    Total current liabilities   1,663       1,397  
               
    Long-term debt   6,195       7,043  
    Deferred tax liabilities, net   499       540  
    Other long-term liabilities   729       858  
    Total long-term liabilities   7,423       8,441  
               
    Commitments and contingencies          
               
    Shares, $0.10 par value, 1,057,879,029 authorized, 141,262,093 conditionally authorized, 940,828,901 issued          
    and 875,830,772 outstanding at December 31, 2024, and CHF 0.10 par value, 1,021,294,549 authorized,          
    142,362,093 conditionally authorized, 843,715,858 issued and 809,030,846 outstanding at December 31, 2023   87       81  
    Additional paid-in capital   14,880       14,544  
    Accumulated deficit   (4,545 )     (4,033 )
    Accumulated other comprehensive loss   (138 )     (177 )
    Total controlling interest shareholders’ equity   10,284       10,415  
    Noncontrolling interest   1       1  
    Total equity   10,285       10,416  
    Total liabilities and equity $ 19,371     $ 20,254  
    TRANSOCEAN LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
    (In millions)
    (Unaudited)
                     
      Years ended December 31, 
      2024        2023        2022  
                     
    Cash flows from operating activities                
    Net loss $ (512 )   $ (954 )   $ (621 )
    Adjustments to reconcile to net cash provided by operating activities:                
    Amortization of contract intangible asset   4       52       117  
    Depreciation and amortization   739       744       735  
    Share-based compensation expense   47       40       29  
    Loss on impairment of assets   772       57        
    Loss on disposal of assets, net   17       183       10  
    Amortization of debt-related balances, net   53       51       33  
    (Gain) loss on adjustment to bifurcated compound exchange feature   (214 )     127       157  
    (Gain) loss on retirement of debt   (161 )     31       (8 )
    Loss on impairment of investment in unconsolidated affiliates   5       5        
    Deferred income tax expense   (42 )     18       46  
    Other, net   (7 )     43       44  
    Changes in deferred revenues, net   45       70       (20 )
    Changes in deferred costs, net   (2 )     (190 )     1  
    Changes in other operating assets and liabilities, net   (297 )     (113 )     (75 )
    Net cash provided by operating activities   447       164       448  
                     
    Cash flows from investing activities                
    Capital expenditures   (254 )     (427 )     (717 )
    Investment in loans to unconsolidated affiliates   (3 )     (3 )     (5 )
    Investment in equity of unconsolidated affiliates         (10 )     (42 )
    Proceeds from disposal of assets, net of costs to sell   101       10       7  
    Cash acquired in acquisition of unconsolidated affiliates   5       7        
    Net cash used in investing activities   (151 )     (423 )     (757 )
                     
    Cash flows from financing activities                
    Repayments of debt   (2,103 )     (1,717 )     (554 )
    Proceeds from issuance of debt, net of issue costs   1,770       1,983       175  
    Proceeds from issuance of shares, net of issue costs               263  
    Proceeds from issuance of warrants, net of issue costs               12  
    Other, net   (17 )     (3 )     (8 )
    Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities   (350 )     263       (112 )
                     
    Net increase (decrease) in unrestricted and restricted cash and cash equivalents   (54 )     4       (421 )
    Unrestricted and restricted cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period   995       991       1,412  
    Unrestricted and restricted cash and cash equivalents, end of period $ 941     $ 995     $ 991  
                                     
    TRANSOCEAN LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    FLEET OPERATING STATISTICS
     
      Three months ended     Years ended  
      December 31,    September 30,   December 31,      December 31,    December 31,   
    Contract Drilling Revenues (in millions) 2024    2024    2023      2024    2023   
    Ultra-deepwater floaters $ 675   $ 668   $ 536     $ 2,518   $ 2,072  
    Harsh environment floaters   277     280     205       1,006     760  
    Total contract drilling revenues $ 952   $ 948   $ 741     $ 3,524   $ 2,832  
      Three months ended     Years ended  
      December 31,    September 30,   December 31,      December 31,    December 31,   
    Average Daily Revenue (1) 2024    2024    2023      2024    2023   
    Ultra-deepwater floaters $ 428,200   $ 426,700   $ 432,100     $ 428,000   $ 393,700  
    Harsh environment floaters   452,600     464,900     354,700       435,900     354,300  
    Total fleet average daily revenue $ 434,700   $ 436,800   $ 407,800     $ 430,100   $ 382,300  
      Three months ended     Years ended
      December 31,    September 30,   December 31,      December 31,    December 31, 
    Revenue Efficiency (2) 2024   2024   2023     2024    2023
    Ultra-deepwater floaters 92.0 %   92.5 %   96.8 %     93.4 %   96.5 %
    Harsh environment floaters 97.6 %   100.1 %   97.6 %     97.5 %   97.8 %
    Total fleet average revenue efficiency 93.5 %   94.5 %   97.0 %     94.5 %   96.8 %
      Three months ended     Years ended
      December 31,     September 30,    December 31,      December 31,     December 31, 
    Utilization (3) 2024   2024   2023     2024   2023
    Ultra-deepwater floaters 64.3 %   60.7 %   46.8 %     57.3 %   49.4 %
    Harsh environment floaters 75.0 %   75.0 %   66.7 %     71.1 %   59.1 %
    Total fleet average rig utilization 66.8 %   63.9 %   51.6 %     60.5 %   51.9 %
                                   
    (1) Average daily revenue is defined as operating revenues, excluding revenues for contract terminations, reimbursements and contract intangible amortization, earned per operating day. An operating day is defined as a day for which a rig is contracted to earn a dayrate during the firm contract period after operations commence.
                                   
    (2) Revenue efficiency is defined as actual operating revenues, excluding revenues for contract terminations and reimbursements, for the measurement period divided by the maximum revenue calculated for the measurement period, expressed as a percentage. Maximum revenue is defined as the greatest amount of contract drilling revenues the drilling unit could earn for the measurement period, excluding revenues for incentive provisions, reimbursements and contract terminations.
                                   
    (3) Rig utilization is defined as the total number of operating days divided by the total number of rig calendar days in the measurement period, expressed as a percentage.
     
                                             
    TRANSOCEAN LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES AND RECONCILIATIONS
    ADJUSTED NET INCOME (LOSS) AND ADJUSTED DILUTED EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
    (in millions, except per share data)
                                             
      YTD   QTD   YTD   QTD   YTD   QTD   YTD
      12/31/24   12/31/24   09/30/24   09/30/24   06/30/24   06/30/24    03/31/24
    Adjusted Net Income (Loss)                                        
    Net income (loss) attributable to controlling interest, as reported $ (512 )   $ 7     $ (519 )   $ (494 )   $ (25 )   $ (123 )   $ 98  
    Loss on impairment of assets, net of tax   755             755       617       138       138        
    Loss on impairment of investment in unconsolidated affiliates   5             5             5       4       1  
    Gain on retirement of debt   (161 )           (161 )     (21 )     (140 )     (140 )      
    Discrete tax items   (141 )     20       (161 )     (38 )     (123 )     (2 )     (121 )
    Net income (loss), as adjusted $ (54 )   $ 27     $ (81 )   $ 64     $ (145 )   $ (123 )   $ (22 )
                                             
    Adjusted Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share:                                        
    Diluted earnings (loss) per share, as reported $ (0.76 )   $ (0.11 )   $ (0.65 )   $ (0.58 )   $ (0.03 )   $ (0.15 )   $ 0.11  
    Loss on impairment of assets, net of tax   0.82             0.82       0.64       0.17       0.17        
    Loss on impairment of investment in unconsolidated affiliates   0.01             0.01                          
    Gain on retirement of debt   (0.18 )           (0.18 )     (0.02 )     (0.17 )     (0.17 )      
    Discrete tax items   (0.15 )     0.02       (0.18 )     (0.04 )     (0.15 )           (0.14 )
    Diluted earnings (loss) per share, as adjusted $ (0.26 )   $ (0.09 )   $ (0.18 )   $     $ (0.18 )   $ (0.15 )   $ (0.03 )
                                             
      YTD   QTD   YTD   QTD   YTD   QTD   YTD
      12/31/23     12/31/23    09/30/23     09/30/23    06/30/23    06/30/23    03/31/23
    Adjusted Net Loss                                        
    Net loss attributable to controlling interest, as reported $ (954 )   $ (104 )   $ (850 )   $ (220 )   $ (630 )   $ (165 )   $ (465 )
    Loss on impairment of assets   57       (1 )     58       5       53       53        
    Loss on disposal of assets, net   169             169             169             169  
    Loss on impairment of investment in unconsolidated affiliate   5       5                                
    Loss on conversion of debt to equity   27       24       3             3       3        
    (Gain) loss on retirement of debt   31       (1 )     32             32             32  
    Discrete tax items   (74 )     3       (77 )     (65 )     (12 )     (1 )     (11 )
    Net loss, as adjusted $ (739 )   $ (74 )   $ (665 )   $ (280 )   $ (385 )   $ (110 )   $ (275 )
                                             
    Adjusted Diluted Loss Per Share:                                        
    Diluted loss per share, as reported $ (1.24 )   $ (0.13 )   $ (1.13 )   $ (0.28 )   $ (0.85 )   $ (0.22 )   $ (0.64 )
    Loss on impairment of assets   0.07             0.08       0.01       0.07       0.07        
    Loss on disposal of assets, net   0.22             0.23             0.23             0.23  
    Loss on impairment of investment in unconsolidated affiliate   0.01       0.01                                
    Loss on conversion of debt to equity   0.04       0.03                                
    (Gain) loss on retirement of debt   0.04             0.04             0.04             0.04  
    Discrete tax items   (0.10 )           (0.10 )     (0.09 )     (0.01 )           (0.01 )
    Diluted loss per share, as adjusted $ (0.96 )   $ (0.09 )   $ (0.88 )   $ (0.36 )   $ (0.52 )   $ (0.15 )   $ (0.38 )
                                               
    TRANSOCEAN LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES AND RECONCILIATIONS
    ADJUSTED CONTRACT DRILLING REVENUES
    EARNINGS BEFORE INTEREST, TAXES, DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION AND RELATED MARGINS
    (in millions, except percentages)
                                               
                                               
        YTD   QTD   YTD   QTD   YTD   QTD   YTD
         12/31/24   12/31/24   09/30/24   09/30/24   06/30/24   06/30/24   03/31/24
                                               
    Contract drilling revenues   $ 3,524     $ 952   $ 2,572     $ 948     $ 1,624     $ 861     $ 763  
    Contract intangible asset amortization     4           4             4             4  
    Adjusted Contract Drilling Revenues   $ 3,528     $ 952   $ 2,576     $ 948     $ 1,628     $ 861     $ 767  
                                               
    Net income (loss)   $ (512 )   $ 7   $ (519 )   $ (494 )   $ (25 )   $ (123 )   $ 98  
    Interest expense, net of interest income     312       81     231       69       162       60       102  
    Income tax expense (benefit)     (11 )     55     (66 )     (31 )     (35 )     156       (191 )
    Depreciation and amortization     739       180     559       190       369       184       185  
    Contract intangible asset amortization     4           4             4             4  
    EBITDA     532       323     209       (266 )     475       277       198  
                                               
    Loss on impairment of assets     772           772       629       143       143        
    Loss on impairment of investment in unconsolidated affiliates     5           5             5       4       1  
    Gain on retirement of debt     (161 )         (161 )     (21 )     (140 )     (140 )      
    Adjusted EBITDA   $ 1,148     $ 323   $ 825     $ 342     $ 483     $ 284     $ 199  
                                               
                                               
    Profit (loss) margin     (14.5 ) %   0.7 %   (20.2 ) %   (52.0 ) %   (1.5 ) %   (14.3 ) %   12.9 %
    EBITDA margin     15.1   %   33.9 %   8.1   %   (28.1 ) %   29.2   %   32.2   %   25.8 %
    Adjusted EBITDA margin     32.5   %   33.9 %   32.0   %   36.0   %   29.7   %   33.0   %   26.0 %
                                             
      YTD   QTD   YTD   QTD   YTD   QTD   YTD
      12/31/23   12/31/23   09/30/23   09/30/23   06/30/23   06/30/23   03/31/23
                                             
    Contract drilling revenues $ 2,832     $ 741     $ 2,091     $ 713     $ 1,378     $ 729     $ 649  
    Contract intangible asset amortization   52       7       45       8       37       19       18  
    Adjusted Contract Drilling Revenues $ 2,884     $ 748     $ 2,136     $ 721     $ 1,415     $ 748     $ 667  
                                             
    Net loss $ (954 )   $ (104 )   $ (850 )   $ (220 )   $ (630 )   $ (165 )   $ (465 )
    Interest expense, net of interest income   594       (13 )     607       220       387       157       230  
    Income tax expense (benefit)   13       21       (8 )     (43 )     35       (16 )     51  
    Depreciation and amortization   744       184       560       192       368       186       182  
    Contract intangible asset amortization   52       7       45       8       37       19       18  
    EBITDA   449       95       354       157       197       181       16  
                                             
    Loss on impairment of assets   57       (1 )     58       5       53       53        
    Loss on disposal of assets, net   169             169             169             169  
    Loss on impairment of investment in unconsolidated affiliate   5       5                                
    Loss on conversion of debt to equity   27       24       3             3       3        
    (Gain) loss on retirement of debt   31       (1 )     32             32             32  
    Adjusted EBITDA $ 738     $ 122     $ 616     $ 162     $ 454     $ 237     $ 217  
                                             
                                             
    Loss margin   (33.7 ) %   (14.0 ) %   (40.7 ) %   (30.9 ) %   (45.7 ) %   (22.6 ) %   (71.6 )%
    EBITDA margin   15.6   %   12.7   %   16.6   %   21.8   %   13.9   %   24.2   %   2.4 %
    Adjusted EBITDA margin   25.6   %   16.3   %   28.9   %   22.5   %   32.1   %   31.7   %   32.5 %
                                             
    TRANSOCEAN LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    SUPPLEMENTAL EFFECTIVE TAX RATE ANALYSIS
    (in millions, except tax rates)
                                 
      Three months ended   Years ended
      December 31,       September 30,      December 31,    December 31,    December 31, 
      2024        2024        2023     2024     2023  
                                 
    Income (loss) before income taxes $ 62     $ (525 )   $ (83 )   $ (523 )   $ (941 )
    Loss on impairment of assets         629       (1 )     772       57  
    Loss on disposal of assets, net                           169  
    Loss on impairment of investment in unconsolidated affiliates               5       5       5  
    Loss on conversion of debt to equity               24             27  
    (Gain) loss on retirement of debt         (21 )     (1 )     (161 )     31  
    Adjusted income (loss) before income taxes $ 62     $ 83     $ (56 )   $ 93     $ (652 )
                                 
                                 
    Income tax expense (benefit) $ 55     $ (31 )   $ 21     $ (11 )   $ 13  
    Loss on impairment of assets         12             17        
    Loss on disposal of assets, net                            
    Loss on impairment of investment in unconsolidated affiliates                            
    Loss on conversion of debt to equity                            
    (Gain) loss on retirement of debt                            
    Changes in estimates (1)   (20 )     38       (3 )     141       74  
    Adjusted income tax expense (benefit) $ 35     $ 19     $ 18     $ 147     $ 87  
                                 
    Effective Tax Rate (2)   89.0     6.0     (25.0 )%      2.2     (1.4 )%
                                 
    Effective Tax Rate, excluding discrete items (3)   56.7     22.5     (30.0 )%      159.1     (13.3 )%
                                 
                                 
    (1) Our estimates change as we file tax returns, settle disputes with tax authorities, or become aware of changes in laws, operational changes and rig movements that have an effect on our (a) deferred taxes, (b) valuation allowances on deferred taxes and (c) other tax liabilities.
                                 
    (2) Our effective tax rate is calculated as income tax expense or benefit divided by income or loss before income taxes.
                                 
    (3) Our effective tax rate, excluding discrete items, is calculated as income tax expense or benefit, excluding various discrete items (such as changes in estimates and tax on items excluded from income before income taxes), divided by income or loss before income taxes, excluding gains and losses on sales and similar items pursuant to the accounting standards for income taxes related to estimating the annual effective tax rate.
                                             
    TRANSOCEAN LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES AND RECONCILIATIONS
    FREE CASH FLOW AND LEVERED FREE CASH FLOW
    (in millions)
                                             
      YTD   QTD   YTD   QTD   YTD   QTD   YTD
      12/31/24   12/31/24   09/30/24   09/30/24   06/30/24   06/30/24   03/31/24
                                             
    Cash provided by (used in) operating activities $ 447     $ 206     $ 241     $ 194     $ 47     $ 133     $ (86 )
    Capital expenditures   (254 )     (29 )     (225 )     (58 )     (167 )     (84 )     (83 )
    Free Cash Flow   193       177       16       136       (120 )     49       (169 )
    Debt repayments   (2,103 )     (30 )     (2,073 )     (258 )     (1,815 )     (1,664 )     (151 )
    Debt repayments, paid from debt proceeds   1,748             1,748       99       1,649       1,649        
    Levered Free Cash Flow $ (162 )   $ 147     $ (309 )   $ (23 )   $ (286 )   $ 34     $ (320 )
                                             
                                             
                                             
      YTD   QTD   YTD   QTD   YTD   QTD   YTD
      12/31/23   12/31/23   09/30/23   09/30/23   06/30/23   06/30/23   03/31/23
                                             
    Cash provided by (used in) operating activities $ 164     $ 98     $ 66     $ (44 )   $ 110     $ 157     $ (47 )
    Capital expenditures   (427 )     (220 )     (207 )     (50 )     (157 )     (76 )     (81 )
    Free Cash Flow   (263 )     (122 )     (141 )     (94 )     (47 )     81       (128 )
    Debt repayments   (1,717 )     (10 )     (1,707 )     (139 )     (1,568 )     (4 )     (1,564 )
    Debt repayments, paid from debt proceeds   1,156             1,156             1,156             1,156  
    Levered Free Cash Flow $ (824 )   $ (132 )   $ (692 )   $ (233 )   $ (459 )   $ 77     $ (536 )
                                             
                                             
                                             
      YTD   QTD   YTD   QTD   YTD   QTD   YTD
      12/31/22   12/31/22   09/30/22   09/30/22   06/30/22   06/30/22   03/31/22
                                             
    Cash provided by (used in) operating activities $ 448     $ 178     $ 270     $ 230     $ 40     $ 41     $ (1 )
    Capital expenditures   (717 )     (409 )     (308 )     (87 )     (221 )     (115 )     (106 )
    Free Cash Flow   (269 )     (231 )     (38 )     143       (181 )     (74 )     (107 )
    Debt repayments   (554 )     (101 )     (453 )     (196 )     (257 )     (92 )     (165 )
    Debt repayments, paid from debt proceeds                                        
    Levered Free Cash Flow $ (823 )   $ (332 )   $ (491 )   $ (53 )   $ (438 )   $ (166 )   $ (272 )

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI Australia: New laws make it criminal to incite racial hatred in NSW

    Source: New South Wales Premiere

    Published: 18 February 2025

    Released by: The Premier, Attorney General


    The NSW Government will introduce legislation to Parliament today to confront hate speech and antisemitism by establishing a new criminal offence for intentionally inciting racial hatred.

    The Crimes Amendment (Inciting Racial Hatred) Bill 2025 responds to recent disgusting instances of antisemitic conduct and hate speech, and makes clear that inciting racial hatred has no place in NSW.

    The legislation will make it a crime to intentionally and publicly incite hatred towards another person, or group of people, on the grounds of race. The bill will establish a new section, 93ZAA of the Crimes Act 1900, with a maximum penalty for an individual of two years’ imprisonment, fines of up to $11,000, or both, while corporations can face fines of $55,000.

    The proposed offence will contain the following elements:

    • It must be a public act;
    • The public act must incite hatred;
    • The incitement to hatred must be intentional; and
    • The intentional incitement to hatred must be on the basis of race.

    To ensure the implied freedom of political communication is protected, the new offences have been drafted to apply to specific conduct.

    The new section includes an exception for directly referencing religious texts during religious teachings.

    Criminalising the incitement of racial hatred is the latest measure taken by the NSW Government to respond to acts of racial violence and hatred. Other actions include:

    • Introducing a new offence in the Crimes Act to ensure people of faith can attend their place of worship in safety and provide police with associated move on powers;
    • Introducing a new offence in 93ZA of the Crimes Act directed to the display of a Nazi symbol on or near a synagogue or place of worship, Jewish school or the Sydney Jewish Museum;
    • Amending existing graffiti offences to make it an aggravated offence to graffiti a place of worship; and
    • Ensuring that hatred or prejudice as motive for an offence will be an aggravating factor on sentence regardless of the presence of other motives.

    The Minns Labor Government also increased funding for the NSW Engagement and Hate Crime Unit, the Safe Places for Faith Communities Grants (led by Multicultural NSW), and the NSW Local Government Social Cohesion Grants Program.

    This package of measures helps crack down on the recent escalation of troubling graffiti, racial hatred and antisemitism in the community.

    It also builds on the work of the NSW Police Force, with Operation Shelter conducting more than 300 proactive patrols daily, while Strike Force Pearl has doubled its fulltime dedicated detectives from 20 to 40.

    With these reforms, the NSW Government is sending a clear message about how seriously it takes racial hatred and antisemitism.

    Premier of NSW Chris Minns said:

    “Racial hatred and antisemitism have no place in our society, and we are making it clear with this law.

    “These are strong new laws because this disgraceful behaviour must stop.

    “NSW is a multicultural state. The people of NSW already stand against racial hatred, and we are making it criminal with this law.

    “While this package confronts recent antisemitism, the new laws will apply to anyone, preying on any person.”

    Attorney General Michael Daley said:

    “Racial hatred is unacceptable – and under this new legislation, it will be a crime to publicly and intentionally incite racial hatred.

    “It is important for members of our community to be protected from conduct that causes them to fear for their safety, or to fear harassment, intimidation or violence.”

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI Economics: African Union Summit 38th Ordinary Session of the Assembly of the Heads of State and Government of the African Union Speech by Dr. Akinwumi A….

    Source: African Development Bank Group
    Your Excellencies, Heads of State and Government,
    I wish to congratulate you, President João Lourenço, on your election as Chairperson of the African Union.
    I also congratulate the out-going Chairperson, President Mohamed Ould Ghazouani, for his excellent leadership of our Union under his tenure.

    MIL OSI Economics

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Police respond to IPCA review of policing public protests

    Source: New Zealand Police (National News)

    Please attribute to Deputy Commissioner Tania Kura:

    Police acknowledges the release of a comprehensive report by the Independent Police Conduct Authority (IPCA) which looks at the policing of public protests in New Zealand and makes several significant recommendations.

    Police has worked closely with the IPCA on this review, which has arisen from complaints to the independent body following high profile protests over recent years.

    We have seen a significant change in the protest environment, aided by social media, in which these events are becoming more publicised, highly organised and, in some instances, utilising complex tactics.

    We are now often faced with these events involving protesters, counter protesters, and activists who are present for a variety of different causes.

    These changes are a global trend which is putting more pressure on police jurisdictions around the world.

    In the last two years, New Zealand Police has attended and monitored at least 140 protests across the country.

    Police is always focussed on ensuring the community has the right to protest but balancing this against upholding the law and ensuring the safety of those attending, as well as members of the public in the vicinity.

    The 2022 parliamentary protest, as well as recent rallies regarding the conflict between Israel and Palestine, highlight some of the complex issues Police is dealing with.

    Today’s report recommends several changes and Police accepts and agrees with these in principle.

    The most significant is the recommendation for a new stand-alone legislation which would put New Zealand in line with comparative jurisdictions such as Australia, the United Kingdom, and Canada.

    Any legislative reform would be led by the Minister of Justice.

    There are also recommendations regarding police policies, processes, and training in the public order policing area.

    Police is considering how best to respond to these, noting that our organisation has already undertaken a raft of changes following the parliamentary protests.

    Our progress and work in this area has been acknowledged by the IPCA in the report.

    We know our officers who work in Public Order Policing teams, as well as all officers who attend to support and police these events, do an incredible job at keeping people safe in what can be a challenging and highly emotional environment.

    We know we must continually improve and adapt to the changing environment in protests and so we look forward to seeing where this review leads us.

    There were three separate investigations into protests in Auckland which are outlined in this review, and we have responded to each of these as below.

    Investigation one:

    The IPCA investigated a high number of complaints regarding the Police response to the Let Women Speak rally held at Albert Park in March 2023.

    This event became volatile very quickly due to behaviour by counter protesters who surrounded the rotunda when the main speaker arrived.

    Police acknowledge the finding by the IPCA in relation to the protest, which says our initial risk assessment could have been better.

    We also accept that our response on the day when protestors surrounded the rotunda was inadequate.

    We do note that our staff were also dealing with a separate unrelated protest on the same day, not far from this location, alongside other operational demands which put significant pressure on officers at these time sensitive events.

    The criticism of the policing of this event was not due to the fault of any individual officer but rather learnings around undertaking a better risk assessment for any future protests, ensuring we have adequate resourcing for these unpredictable events.

    We have debriefed this matter and taken these lessons onboard.

    We also note that Police carried out an investigation following the event, and two counter-protesters were charged with assault.

    Investigation two:

    The second investigation referenced in the IPCA report relates to the arrest of a counter-protestor during a rally in support of Palestine in November 2023 at Aotea Square, Auckland.

    A man was holding an Israeli flag around 150 metres from where protesters were setting up a speaking area.

    Police told the man to leave and stay away from the event to prevent a potential breach of the peace. They told the man he would be arrested if he returned.

    The man left but returned without his flag, his face covered, and stood in Aotea Square while speeches took place.

    He was arrested and charged with intentionally obstructing a police officer acting in the execution of his duty.

    Police accept this arrest was unlawful and while the intent of the officers was to ensure the man’s safety, we accept they had no lawful basis to tell him to leave or to arrest him when he returned.

    We have spoken with the officers involved in this incident and have used this as a learning opportunity for them. 

    The charge of obstruction was withdrawn.

    Investigation three:

    During the same rally in Auckland’s CBD in November 2023, Police came across a different counter-protester who was holding a sign which they believed had the potential to incite violence.

    Police, concerned for the woman’s safety, asked her to move and put down her sign and when she failed to comply, they had to move her a short distance away and took her sign off her.

    When she continued to try and re-enter the protest they arrested her for a breach of the peace.

    The IPCA has found the use of force to move the woman away was unjustified and the arrest was unlawful.

    While Police acknowledge the IPCA’s view on this, we believe our officers were acting in the woman’s best interests to keep her safe due to their previous experience at pro-Palestine events which had turned violent very quickly.

    We do accept that she should have been given her sign back when she was released by Police. 

    The primary role of Police at these events is to ensure everyone’s safety while they protest.

    If there is a concern that someone may be harmed, Police will act within the boundaries of the law to protect all individuals present. 

    We recognise the delicate balance between a person’s right to peacefully protest and maintaining public order.

    Our officers are entrusted to make these decisions based on their knowledge and information available to them.

    ENDS

    Issued by the Police Media Centre 

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-OSI United Nations: Use Upcoming Tenth Anniversary of Minsk Accord’s Signing to Renew Diplomatic Efforts towards De-escalation in Ukraine, Assistant Secretary-General Urges Security Council

    Source: United Nations MIL OSI b

    The Minsk Agreements show that the signing of a peace pact alone does not ensure a durable end to conflict, the Security Council heard today as it met a decade after the adoption of Council resolution 2202 (2015), which called for the full implementation of those accords.

    The international community must use the 10-year anniversary as an opportunity to “recall past diplomatic efforts towards de-escalation” as well as reflect “on what happens when peacemaking fails”, Miroslav Jenča, Assistant Secretary-General for Europe, Central Asia and Americas in the Departments of Political and Peacebuilding Affairs and Peace Operations, said.  He noted that in one week, it will be “three tragic years” since the Russian Federation’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

    Highlighting the crucial role of regional and subregional organizations, he praised the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) Special Monitoring Mission for monitoring ceasefire violations and helping to maintain dialogue for “eight difficult years”.  Any peaceful settlement must respect the sovereignty, independence and territorial integrity of Ukraine, he said, welcoming all initiatives with the full participation of Ukraine and the Russian Federation.  Ensuring the conflict does not reoccur or escalate requires genuine political will and understanding of its “multidimensional complexity”, he said.

    Peace Activist Haunted by Dead Ukrainian, Russian Soldiers, Says War Could Have Been Avoided through Diplomacy

    “The people of Ukraine are divided – they are either pro- or anti-Russian,” stated Roger Waters, civil peace activist, who also addressed the Council today.  To those questioning his credentials, he said:  “I’m here to talk about war and peace and love, and my credentials are firmly in place.” “Hundreds of thousands of dead Ukrainian and Russian soldiers […] are in this room with us today [and] they haunt me,” he said. 

    Recalling the Maidan protests in Kyiv, he stressed that this is one of the problems with regime change — “dead bodies, they are somebody’s loved one”. Immediately after the Government change in 2014, Crimea seceded from Ukraine and joined the Russian Federation. “Did it secede or was it annexed?” he asked, pointing to a referendum held at the time, in which 95 per cent of Ukrainians in Crimea voted to secede. 

    The agreements — Minsk I, signed in September 2014, and Minsk II, in February 2015 — outlined steps for ending the conflict in eastern Ukraine through a political settlement.  The latter accord stipulated a ceasefire in certain areas of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions and the withdrawal of military equipment by both sides.  It also included a commitment by Kyiv to organize local elections and grant special status to the separatist-held areas in eastern Ukraine and the reinstatement of Ukraine’s full control over its border.

    Mr. Waters said that despite campaigning on the promise to resume Minsk II, Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who came to power in 2019, did not do so, and in 2022, Russian troops crossed the border to Ukraine. This war could have been avoided through diplomacy, he insisted, adding that President Zelenskyy had started talking to Russian President Vladimir Putin and by the end of April 2014, a ceasefire agreement had been agreed upon in Istanbul.  The war could have been a stillborn, but then United Kingdom Prime Minister Boris Johnson arrived in Kyiv with the message that the war should be continued as it “suits the Americans” — “the longer it takes, the better”. 

    Citing the telephone talks between United States President Donald Trump and President Putin as a potential move in the right direction, he concluded:  “Maybe there is a glimmer of light at the end of this dark tunnel of war — it comes three years and hundreds of thousands of priceless lives too late, but maybe it’s a start.”

    United States Committed to Ending Carnage, Restoring Europe’s Stability, its Speaker Says 

    Washington, D.C., is committed to ending the carnage and restoring Europe’s stability, the representative of the United States said, adding:  “We want a sovereign and prosperous Ukraine but we must start by recognizing that returning to Ukraine’s pre-2014 borders is an unrealistic objective.”  Further, he added:  “Chasing this illusionary goal will only prolong the war and cause more suffering.” At the same time, he underscored that the Russian Federation has consistently undermined the Minsk Agreement; therefore, a durable peace for Ukraine must include robust security guarantees to ensure the war will not begin again.  Describing Moscow’s illegal war of conquest as “a strategic error”, he said that “the easy way out is through negotiations”.  If Moscow, instead, “chooses the hard way”, it will incur greater and escalating costs to its economy and losses on the battlefield, he warned. 

    New United States Administration Has Created Space for Diplomacy, Russian Federation’s Representative Says 

    For his part, the Russian Federation’s delegate said that “the entry into office of the Republican United States Administration” has created space for the emergence of diplomacy.  Those who seized power in Ukraine, following the 2014 anti-constitutional coup, had no intention of implementing the Minsk Agreements, he said.  Citing statements by various Ukrainian officials who described the Agreements as “a noose on the neck” and “not binding in nature”, he said the Agreements were “a smokescreen” for Western countries while they provided Ukraine armaments. 

    Outlining lessons to draw from the failure of the Minsk process, he said European Union countries and the United Kingdom are “unfaithful to their word and they cannot be a party to any future agreement”.  Also stressing the need to provide autonomy to the east of Ukraine and guarantees for its Russian language population, he said that President Zelenskyy “is deathly afraid of elections and is doing everything possible to drag them out”.  A future Ukraine needs to be “a demilitarized neutral State, not a part of any blocs or alliances,” he said, adding that it was the prospect of the entry of Ukraine into the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) that triggered the crisis.

    Entire History of Minsk Agreement “Long List of Violations’ by Moscow”, Ukraine’s Delegate Says

    However, Ukraine’s delegate countered that the entire history of the Minsk Agreements “was a long list of violations” by Moscow.  In 2022, “on this very day”, “in this very chamber”, when her country expressed concern about the buildup of troops along its border and other developments, the Russian Federation had underscored that there is no alternative to the Minsk Agreements, she recalled.  Four days later, that country recognized the so-called independence of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions of Ukraine.  Among others, it never implemented paragraph 4 of the Minsk Protocol, concerning the establishment of a security area in the border regions of the two countries, she said.

     “It is because people of Ukraine are pro-Ukrainian [that] the Russian Federation has failed,” she added.  Any future arrangement involving the Kremlin must include enforcement mechanisms and preventive measures, she stressed, adding:  “What responsible States see as commitments to be upheld, the Russian Federation treats as a tactical ploy.”  Ukraine is working with its partners to find strong solutions, she said, stressing:  “Weak agreements will not bring real peace; they will only lead to the greater war.” 

    Other Council Members Weigh In

    Denmark’s delegate described the current meeting as “part of an ongoing disinformation campaign” to try and distract the international community from the subjugation of Ukraine.  Welcoming Ukraine’s ratification of the Rome Statute, she expressed support for a special tribunal to investigate crimes conducted in that country.  While “no one wants this war to end more than Ukraine”, the United Kingdom’s delegate said, President Putin’s preconditions for talks have been that Ukraine withdraws from large swathes of its own sovereign territory and abandons its right to choose its alliances.  “No country could accept this,” she said, reaffirming that London will provide concrete support for Ukraine for as long as needed. 

    “The Minsk Agreements were a diplomatic initiative designed to prevent further bloodshed and establish a political pathway to peace in Ukraine,” said Germany’s representative, adding that Moscow obstructed its implementation and chose to pursue expansionist conquest.  “This war should not have been started in the first place,” she stressed, calling on all States to unite behind the draft General Assembly resolution on advancing peace in Ukraine.  Along similar lines, France’s delegate highlighted the tireless mediation by Paris and Berlin, to enable Ukraine and Russian Federation to find common ground. However, Moscow chose war, he said, while Greece’s delegate stressed that “no interpretation of the Minsk Agreements can ever justify the invasion of Ukraine”.

    “We need something more than Minsk III,” Slovenia’s delegate said, adding that the abstract nature of the Agreements allowed for multiple interpretations.  Any future accord must be much be more specific with clear timelines, defined sequencing and a monitoring mechanism, he stressed.  Similarly, Somalia’s delegate underscored the importance of clarity, particularly in diplomatic tools, and said the implementation of ceasefire provisions requires robust and impartial verifying mechanisms.  The Republic of Korea’s delegate stressed that “the entire world is well aware of who is aggressor and who is the victim,” also adding that the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea’s support of the Russian Federation, with troops and munitions, is a grave violation of the Organization’s resolutions. 

    Several speakers expressed concern about the failure of diplomacy, while others called on the international community to rally behind new diplomatic efforts.  Since the onset of the Ukraine crisis, Beijing has been calling for a political solution through dialogue and has been actively engaged in diplomatic mediations, China’s representative, Council President for the month, said in his national capacity.  The legitimate security concerns of all countries should be taken seriously, he said, welcoming the Washington, D.C.-Moscow agreement to start peace talks. 

    “We have been consistent in our calls for restraint,” said Pakistan’s delegate, as he expressed regret that the Minsk Agreement could not reach just and lasting peace in the region.  “We must learn from the past so we do not commit the same errors,” Panama’s delegate added, stressing that dialogue and diplomacy is the only path to peace. 

    “The failed implementation of the Minsk Agreement cannot be the reason to prolong this war,” said Guyana’s delegate, reiterating calls for an end to the hostilities and for the withdrawal of Russian Federation’s forces from Ukraine’s territory.  “Until this day more and more civilians are losing their lives, including women and children,” pointed out Algeria’s representative, while Sierra Leone’s delegate underscored that “the conflict in Ukraine will not be resolved by military means”.

    MIL OSI United Nations News

  • MIL-OSI United Nations: Syria: Mine casualties persist as UN partners scale up clearance operations

    Source: United Nations 2

    Humanitarian Aid

    Explosive ordnance continues to claim lives across Syria, with more than 430 deaths and injuries reported since December, nearly a third of them children, according to Stéphane Dujarric, the Spokesperson for the Secretary-General 

    “Mine action partners continue to report casualties due to explosive ordnance, and that is happening sadly on an almost daily basis,” Mr. Dujarric explained in a press briefing on Monday in New York.

    Farmers and shepherds are particularly vulnerable. Since January, more than 60 people have been killed and over 90 injured, many while tending to their land or grazing animals. 

    Clearance efforts underway 

    With hostilities subsiding in some areas, humanitarian partners have been expanding mine action work in newly accessible regions.

    Since December, over 1,400 unexploded ordnance items have been safely disposed of, and 138 minefields and contaminated areas identified in Idleb, Aleppo, Hama, Deir-ez-Zor and Lattakia.

    On Monday, UN partners visited a farm in Darayya, Rural Damascus, that had been cleared with support from the Syria Humanitarian Fund. This work is critical to enabling farmers to safely return to their land.

    Aid and diplomacy continue 

    Meanwhile, humanitarian aid operations remain uninterrupted.

    Over the weekend, 40 trucks carrying nearly 1,000 metric tonnes of food from the World Food Programme (WFP) crossed from Türkiye into northwest Syria through the Bab Al-Hawa border crossing – assistance sufficient for more than 270,000 people.

    UN partners have also increased the import of food and other aid from Jordan since the start of the year.

    On the diplomatic front, UN Special Envoy for Syria Geir Pedersen is set to visit Damascus this week following meetings at the Munich Security Conference. 

    There, he stressed the need for an inclusive, Syrian-led political process and urged all parties to uphold their commitments on women’s rights. 

    “[The UN] calls on all parties in Syria to uphold their international commitments, respect the rights and dignity of women, and to ensure their full participation in shaping the country’s future,” Mr. Dujarric said.  

    This includes ensuring access to education, freedom of movement, political representation and protection from violence and exploitation. 

    MIL OSI United Nations News

  • MIL-OSI United Nations: Secretary-General Appoints Jens Wandel of Denmark Special Adviser to Secretary-General on Reforms

    Source: United Nations General Assembly and Security Council

    United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres announced today the appointment of Jens Wandel of Denmark as Special Adviser to the Secretary-General on Reforms.  He was previously appointed to this function from 2018 to 2020 during the implementation phase of the reforms. 

    The Secretary-General has tasked Special Adviser Wandel with delivering an internal review of the progress made and remaining gaps implementing the reforms.  Working within and across all three reform streams (Sustainable Development, Peace & Security and Management), the Special Adviser will work to deepen the impact of the three reforms, including by recommendations to the Secretary-General for the key departments, the United Nations Sustainable Development Group, and the United Nations High-level Committee on Management. 

    Mr. Wandel has had a distinguished service within the United Nations.  He served as the United Nations Office for Project Services (UNOPS) Executive Director (ad interim), the Secretary-General’s Designate for the COVID-19 Response and Recovery Fund, and the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) Assistant Administrator, Director of the Bureau of Management.  He also held various positions at the country level, including as Resident Coordinator and UNDP Resident Representative in Turkmenistan and other UNDP positions in Kyrgyzstan and Viet Nam.  He brings a wide range of experience across operational, programmatic and policy matters, which is critical for implementing the key outstanding elements of the reforms. 

    Mr. Wandel holds a Master of Arts equivalent in political science (development and public management) from the University of Aarhus, Denmark.  He is fluent in English and Danish.

    __________

    * This supersedes Press Release SG/A/1821-BIO/5111 of 31 July 2018.

    MIL OSI United Nations News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: How far would you trust AI to make important decisions?

    Source: University of South Australia

    18 February 2025

    Would you trust AI to choose your medical treatment?

    From tailored Netflix recommendations to personalised Facebook feeds, artificial intelligence (AI) adeptly serves content that matches our preferences and past behaviours. But while a restaurant tip or two is handy, how comfortable would you be if AI-algorithms were in charge of your medical expert or new hire?

    Now, a new study from the University of South Australia shows that most people are more likely to trust AI in situations where the stakes are low, such as music suggestions, but less likely to trust AI in high-stakes situations, such as medical decisions.

    However, those with poor statistical literacy or little familiarity with AI were just as likely to trust algorithms for trivial choices as they were for critical decisions.

    Assessing responses from nearly 2000 participants across 20 countries, researchers found that statistical literacy affects trust differently. People who understand that AI-algorithms work through pattern-based predictions (but also have risks and biases) were more sceptical of AI in high-stakes situations, but less so in low-stakes situations.

    They also found that older people and men were generally more cautious of algorithms, as were people in highly industrialised nations like Japan, the US, and the UK.

    Understanding how and when people trust AI-algorithms is essential, particularly as society continues to introduce and adopt machine-learning technologies.

    AI adoption rates have increased dramatically with 72% of organisations now using AI in their business.

    Lead author and human and artificial cognition expert, Dr Fernando Marmolejo-Ramos, says the speed at which smart technologies are being used to outsource decisions is outpacing our understanding to successfully integrate them into society.

    “Algorithms are becoming increasingly influential in our lives, impacting everything from minor choices about music or food, to major decisions about finances, healthcare, and even justice,” Dr Marmolejo-Ramos says.

    “But the use of algorithms to help make decisions implies that there should be some confidence in their reliability. That’s why it’s so important to understand what influences people’s trust in algorithmic decision-making.

    “Our research found that in low-stakes scenarios, such as restaurant recommendations or music selection, people with higher levels of statistical literacy were more likely to trust algorithms.

    “Yet, when the stakes were high, for things like health or employment, the opposite was true; those with better statistical understanding were less likely to place their faith in algorithms.”

    UniSA’s Dr Florence Gabriel says there should be a concentrated effort to promote statistical and AI literacy among the general population so that people can better judge when to trust algorithmic decisions.

    “An AI-generated algorithm is only as good as the data and coding that it’s based on,” Dr Gabriel says.

    “We only need to look at the recent banning of DeepSeek to grasp how algorithms can produce biased or risky data depending on the content that it was built upon.

    “On the flip side, when an algorithm has been developed through a trusted and transparent source, such as the custom-build EdChat chatbot for South Australian schools, it’s more easily trusted.

    “Learning these distinctions is important. People need to know more about how algorithms work, and we need to find ways to deliver this in clear, simple ways that are relevant to the user’s needs and concerns.

    “People care about what the algorithm does and how it affects them. We need clear, jargon-free explanations that align with the user’s concerns and context. That way we can help people to responsibly engage with AI.”

    …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

    Contacts for interview: Dr Florence Gabriel E: Florence.Gabriel@unisa.edu.au
    Dr Fernando Marmolejo-Ramos (now at Flinders University) E: fernando.marmolejoramos@flinders.edu.au
    Media contact:
    Annabel Mansfield M: +61 479 182 489 E: Annabel.Mansfield@unisa.edu.au

    Other articles you may be interested in

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-Evening Report: Is Australia’s GST a tax or a tariff? And why has it become a target in the trade wars?

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Felicity Deane, Professor, Queensland University of Technology

    Australian beef exports to the United States are GST-free and should not be subject to any retaliatory tariff. William Edge/Shutterstock

    The latest round of proposed tariffs from US President Donald Trump includes a response to what the White House describes as “unfair” taxes – specifically, value-added taxes such as Australia’s Goods and Services Tax (GST).

    Most economically advanced countries have a value-added tax (VAT) or sales tax on consumption. This applies to domestic goods and services as well as to imports. The United States is one of the few countries that does not impose a sales tax, though many of the states impose their own sales tax.

    So the argument, according to the White House, is these taxes apply to imported goods, but not to exports.

    Is the GST a tax or a tariff?

    The GST is a broad-based consumption tax of 10%. It applies to most goods and services that are consumed in Australia, regardless of their origin.

    An import tariff – sometimes called an import duty – is imposed exclusively on imported goods as a condition of market access.

    Tariffs are not imposed on domestically produced goods at all. This is the main point of difference with a domestic consumption tax. The GST applies equally to imported and domestically produced goods, adhering to long-agreed international trade rules.

    It remains unclear how the Trump administration intends to implement a tariff that is equivalent to the 10% GST. In effect, this becomes a tax on US consumers if they buy Australian goods.




    Read more:
    What’s a trade war?


    Such an indirect tax would be regressive, which means it falls more heavily on lower-income consumers. The expansion of tariffs to include other nations’ VAT systems also represents a significant overreach into national sovereignty. It has long been accepted that sovereign nations have the right to tax their citizens and businesses as they see fit.

    Indeed, Australia’s GST is among the lowest among economically advanced nations, for which the average is 19%, so the wider impact on US consumers will be even greater.

    Goods that are exported to the US face a new round of tariffs.
    Shutterstock

    Trump is clearly (and unapologetically) seeking to reinvigorate US manufacturing. But the reality is that US labour costs are high. It is also inefficient for any country to produce all the goods and services its population requires. This is particularly the case in such a high-consumption nation as the US.

    The US has been described as a consumer of last resort
    because strong consumer demand has been filled by ever rising imports from other countries. The mutually beneficial relationship between the US and China has enabled the rise of the middle class in China. Trump’s tariffs may shift this, causing geopolitical tensions and economic instability.

    Australia’s response: pausing the digital services tax

    While these tariffs primarily harm US consumers, Australian businesses will also feel the effects. However, it is unclear to what extent. Notably, one main export to the US, unprocessed agricultural products such as beef, are GST-free and should not be subject to any retaliatory tariff.

    However, many other Australian exports could be disadvantaged. Trump’s policies will raise the cost of Australian imported goods in the US market, potentially making them less appealing to US consumers.

    The threat of these tariffs is clearly a problem for a federal government facing an impending election, and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has so far responded cautiously. While a diplomatic approach may secure a minor concession, it’s in stark contrast to Canada’s firm stance, which included immediate threats of retaliatory measures.




    Read more:
    Whether we carve out an exemption or not, Trump’s latest tariffs will still hit Australia


    Trump’s use of tariff threats as a negotiating tactic does appear to be having the desired effect, with a potential suspension of Australia’s proposed big tech levy. This proposal would have imposed a tax on major tech firms such as Meta and Google if they did not reach a direct agreement with local media companies.

    Reports indicate the government has put this proposal on hold due to the risk of retaliatory tariffs from the US. Such a tax would likely have invoked the wrath of the US administration, with the digital services levies of Canada and France specifically referenced in the most recent White House tariff announcement.

    It is fair to say the White House statement deliberately misleads any reader into thinking that tariff percentages directly impact on trade volumes.

    This statement ignores a fundamental principle that has made international trade so appealing since World War II – and why economists have argued in support of it for hundreds of years. Countries produce and trade the goods and services at which they are efficient. Efficiency leads to lower costs which, all else being equal, means consumers are better off.

    The statement from the White House, together with Trump’s past pronouncements, demonstrate that all rules to do with international taxation and fairness have been thrown out.

    This does not appear to be the main concern, however, with Australian negotiators potentially willing to put on hold a crucial policy to ensure the long-term viability of local journalism.

    This is just the beginning. Anyone who felt some comfort and safety in the strength of our own democracy should carefully consider the overreach that is occurring through these threats.

    Felicity Deane does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. Is Australia’s GST a tax or a tariff? And why has it become a target in the trade wars? – https://theconversation.com/is-australias-gst-a-tax-or-a-tariff-and-why-has-it-become-a-target-in-the-trade-wars-250041

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-Evening Report: Australian students just recorded the lowest civics scores since testing began. But young people do care about politics

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Philippa Collin, Professor, Institute for Culture and Society, Western Sydney University

    Australian school students’ civics knowledge is the lowest it has been since testing began 20 years ago, according to new national data.

    Results have fallen since the last assessment in 2019 and to the lowest levels since the national civics test began in 2004.

    This follows a federal parliamentary report earlier this month, calling for mandatory civics education in Australian schools (it is currently part of the curriculum but not compulsory). The report cited fears young people are “poorly equipped” to participate in Australian democracy.

    The latest results are certainly concerning. But as a researcher of the political lives of young people, I would caution against assuming young people “don’t care” about politics, or are unable to engage in it.

    We also need to think about how civics education can engage meaningfully with young people and meet their needs.

    What does the new report say?

    This report from the Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority is based on a national sample of Year 6 and Year 10 students, who are tested on their civics and citizenship skills. It includes knowledge of democratic principles, the Australian political system and related history.

    The test is supposed to run every three years, but the most recent one was delayed by COVID. In 2024:

    • 43% of Year 6 students attained the “proficient standard”, compared with 53% in 2019

    • 28% of Australian Year 10 students met the proficient standard, compared with 38% in 2019.



    Young people care about history and community

    Alongside their civics skills, students were also asked about their support for a range of “citizenship behaviours”. While these figures have dropped from previous years, they nevertheless indicate most students are engaged in civic issues.

    • 81% of Year 6 students and 75% of Year 10 students thought learning about Australa’s history was “very or quite” important

    • 77% of Year 6 students and 70% of Year 10 students thought participating in activities to benefit the local community was “very or quite” important

    • 85% of Year 6 students and 68% of Year 10 students thought taking part in activities to protect the environment was “very or quite important”.



    Young people are knowledgable and active

    My research with young Australians shows they are interested, knowledgeable and active on civic and political issues in many different ways.

    This includes getting involved in or creating their own organisations, campaigns and online content. The issues range from bullying to mental health, climate change and ending gender-based violence.

    My research also shows even children as young as six have views on how to address complex issues such as climate change.

    When provided with platforms that respect their views, young people show they can research, deliberate and problem-solve. Many have clear opinions on what makes for a good life for themselves, Australia and the world. Initiatives such as a children’s parliament can connect their views directly with those who govern.

    Young people don’t feel included

    But governments and other authorities are historically poor at meaningfully engaging with young people.

    In my work and other research, we continue to hear many students feel they don’t have a genuine voice in the community.

    For example, in the climate movement, young female activists have said they do not feel feel their views are taken seriously by decision-makers because they are under 18.

    This suggests children’s interest and confidence in democracy could be supported by giving them meaningful opportunities to participate before they can vote.

    For example, creating governance mechanisms that include and are accountable to young people on matters that affect them. This should extend to issues which will significantly impact them into the future, such as housing and tax.

    Technology and critical media literacy matter

    We also have to make sure students are supported to get good quality information about issues relevant to them. And that they have the skills and resources to navigate information online.

    Research suggests engagement with news and strong media literacy skills are linked to civic participation.

    Studies have also found many Australian children who have high interest in the news are also involved in social issues online. Research shows social media is a key source for this news (as opposed to traditional sources such as newspapers or television).

    At the same time, just 41% of children aged 8–16 are confident they can tell fake news stories from real ones (which is is similar to survey results for adults).

    We also know some students, particularly from lower socioeconomic backgrounds, lack access to the technology they need for their schooling and everyday lives.

    How can civics and citizenship knowledge be improved?

    The new data certainly indicates the current system for civics education is not working for Australian students.

    As we work to improve young people’s civics knowledge, research indicates any new approach in schools should be created in conjunction with young people themselves. If young people are given a say in how their civics education is designed, they will be more engaged and the lessons will be more effective, especially for students who face disadvantage.

    Other studies we have co-designed and co-researched with young people have resulted in recommendations to trust young people and give them responsibilities and real-world learning opportunities, outside of school. They prioritised self-efficacy (people’s belief they can can control events that affect their lives) and a sense of belonging.

    If civics education is going to be effective, it should acknowledge young people already have an interest and a stake in politics, focus on where they get their information, and involve them in how civics education is designed and delivered.

    We might then have a model for supporting civics and citizenship learning across the community and across people’s lives.

    Philippa Collin receives funding from the Australian Research Council, Google, batyr and NSW Health.

    ref. Australian students just recorded the lowest civics scores since testing began. But young people do care about politics – https://theconversation.com/australian-students-just-recorded-the-lowest-civics-scores-since-testing-began-but-young-people-do-care-about-politics-250047

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-Evening Report: With just 5 years to go, the world is failing on a vital deal to halt biodiversity loss

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Justine Bell-James, Professor, TC Beirne School of Law, The University of Queensland

    Almost 200 nations have signed an ambitious agreement to halt and reverse biodiversity loss but none is on track to meet the crucial goal, our new research reveals.

    The agreement, known formally as the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, seeks to coordinate global efforts to conserve and restore biodiversity. Its overarching goal is to safeguard biodiversity for future generations.

    Biodiversity refers to the richness and variety within and between plant and animal species, and within ecosystems. This diversity is declining faster than at any time in human history.

    Five years remain until the framework’s 2030 deadline. Our research shows a more intense global effort is needed to achieve the goals of the agreement and stem the biodiversity crisis.

    Biodiversity is in decline

    Biodiversity decline is a growing global issue. Around one million animal and plant species are threatened with extinction.

    The problem is driven by human activities such as land clearing, climate change, pollution, excessive resource extraction and the introduction of invasive species.

    As biodiversity continues to degrade, the foundation of life on Earth becomes increasingly unstable. Biodiversity loss threatens our food, water and air. It increases our vulnerability to natural disasters and imperils ecosystems crucial for human survival and wellbeing.

    The Global Biodiversity Framework was adopted in late 2022 after four years of consultation and negotiation. It involved 23 core commitments to be met by 2030 involving both land and sea. Key to the deal is protecting areas from future harm, and restoring past harms.

    These aims are captured in two targets.

    The first is ensuring 30% of degraded areas are under “effective restoration” to enhance biodiversity. This could involve replanting vegetation, reducing weeds and other pests, or restoring water to drained areas.

    The second is to effectively conserve and manage 30% of land and sea areas – especially those important for biodiversity and the ways ecosystems function and benefit humans. This could mean creating national or marine parks, or nature refuges on private land.

    Importantly, countries should both increase the size of areas protected or under restoration (a matter of quantity), and choose areas where interventions will most benefit biodiversity (a matter of quality).

    Nations were asked to provide an action plan before October 2024. In a paper published today, we reviewed these plans.

    What we found

    Our findings were disappointing. Only 36 countries (less than one quarter of signatory nations) submitted a plan. Australia was one of them.

    And the plans provided were underwhelming. In particular, nations fell badly short on the restoration target. Only nine out of 36 countries committed to restoring a specific percentage of land and sea.

    For example, Italy pledged only to restore “large surfaces of degraded areas” and Australia committed to restoring “priority degraded areas”.

    Defining commitments with numbers is important, because it allows progress to be monitored and measured, and forces nations to be accountable.

    Of those nine countries that made specific restoration commitments, only six committed to the 30% goal: Aruba, China, Curaçao, Japan, Luxembourg and Uganda.

    The results were better when it came to protecting land and sea. Some 22 of the 36 countries set a percentage target for protection. However, only 14 committed to protecting at least 30% of areas, in line with the goals of the deal.

    Again, quality is also important here. Under the deal nations signed up to, protected land should enhance biodiversity, and cover areas very valuable for biodiversity recovery. However, many nations were silent on the issue of quality when outlining their planned protections. It means their efforts could, in some cases, do little for biodiversity.

    A spotlight on Australia

    In recent years, Australia has sought to establish itself as a biodiversity leader on the international stage. This included hosting the global Nature Positive Summit in October last year.

    Following the summit, the federal government claimed it was:

    a tangible demonstration of Australia’s commitments under the Kunming Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework. It showed our willingness to work collaboratively towards the goal of halting and reversing biodiversity loss.

    But despite the rhetoric, our research shows Australia’s plans are not particularly impressive.

    As noted above, Australia does not provide a percentage target for ecosystem restoration. Instead, its plan refers broadly to restoring “priority areas” without defining what these areas are.

    Australia’s plan pledges to identify “priority degraded areas” and define what “under effective restoration” means, but does not outline how this will be done.

    Australia is more aligned with global leaders on protection of biodiversity. It committed to safeguarding 30% of land and water in protected areas.

    However, it provided limited details on how it will select, implement and enforce protection measures. The plan also fails to recognise current shortcomings in protected areas, both in oceans and on land – in particular, Australia’s focus to date on quantity over quality when it comes to selecting sites.

    In contrast, the nation of Slovenia mapped out proposed protected areas.

    So, while Australia did submit an action plan, it has missed the opportunity to be a true global leader.

    Running out of time

    The Global Biodiversity Framework aims to unite nations in the fight to conserve and restore biodiversity. But as our research shows, many countries do not have plans to achieve this, and plans submitted to date are largely inadequate.

    As species and habitats are lost, ecosystems become less stable. This damages human health and wellbeing, as well as economies. Biodiversity loss also undermines vital cultural and spiritual connections to nature.

    All countries must accelerate efforts to avert the biodiversity crisis, and preserve Earth’s precious natural places for future generations.

    Justine Bell-James receives funding from the Australian Research Council, the National Environmental Science Program, and Queensland Government’s Department of Environment, Tourism, Science and Innovation. She is a Director of the National Environmental Law Association.

    James Watson has received funding from the Australian Research Council, National Environmental Science Program, South Australia’s Department of Environment and Water, Queensland’s Department of Environment, Science and Innovation as well as from Bush Heritage Australia, Queensland Conservation Council, Australian Conservation Foundation, The Wilderness Society and Birdlife Australia. He serves on the scientific committee of BirdLife Australia and has a long-term scientific relationship with Bush Heritage Australia and Wildlife Conservation Society. He serves on the Queensland government’s Land Restoration Fund’s Investment Panel as the Deputy Chair.

    ref. With just 5 years to go, the world is failing on a vital deal to halt biodiversity loss – https://theconversation.com/with-just-5-years-to-go-the-world-is-failing-on-a-vital-deal-to-halt-biodiversity-loss-249841

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-Evening Report: Should you be allowed to sue a judge? The High Court says no

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Stephen Parker, Honorary Professorial Fellow, Melbourne CSHE, The University of Melbourne

    Shutterstock

    Judges in Australian courtrooms have a lot of power. They can decide on someone’s guilt and the punishment for it, including lengthy prison time.

    But what if they get it badly wrong? Should you be able to sue a judge for damages?

    For several centuries the answer has been no in a “superior” court, such as a state Supreme Court, but possibly yes in an “inferior” court, such as a magistrates, district or county court, where most cases are actually heard.

    The High Court of Australia has now ruled that judges are immune from being sued for damages in every court and for all purposes. It is absolute, even if you have been falsely imprisoned.

    But how did this decision come to be, and what does it mean for fair judicial processes?

    The High Court case

    The story behind the ruling began with a legal property dispute between a couple called the Stradfords.

    Judge Salvatore Vasta in the Federal Circuit Court ordered that Mr Stradford should make “full and frank disclosure” of various financial documents. Mrs Stradford complained repeatedly that the disclosure was not complete.

    Judge Vasta adjourned proceedings briefly to allow them to discuss settlement. To give Mr Stradford something to think about, he said he hoped Mr Stradford had brought his toothbrush with him.

    Later that day, Judge Vasta sentenced Mr Stradford to 12 months’ imprisonment for contempt of court in disobeying the disclosure order. Judge Vasta mistakenly assumed a previous judge had already decided Mr Stradford was in contempt.

    Mr Stradford appealed the contempt conviction in the Full Court of the Family Court. It allowed the appeal, concluding “the processes employed [by Judge Vasta] were so devoid of procedural fairness […] and the reasons for judgment so lacking in engagement with the issues of fact and law to be applied” that it would be an “affront to justice” to permit the contempt declaration and the imprisonment order to stand.

    Armed with this finding, Mr Stradford sued Judge Vasta for damages for false imprisonment and won. Judge Vasta then appealed to the High Court, arguing that he was immune from being sued. In its ruling last week, the High Court agreed with him.

    Why can’t judges be sued?

    Immunity from being sued helps protect judicial independence, said the High Court.

    If, at the back of their mind, a judge thinks they might be sued for damages should they make a wrong decision, they might be swayed by that, rather than objectively and impartially applying the law to the facts.

    Immunity also helps to achieve finality in court proceedings and “quell disputes”. Finality is a consideration in all legal systems, and is the reason why some claims are time-barred if not brought within a specified period. You don’t want the same cases dragging on forever.

    The High Court noted that a disappointed litigant can appeal against a decision, but once all appeal avenues have been exhausted, that is that.

    The High Court has ruled judges can’t be sued for their decisions.
    Shutterstock

    If a judge has committed a crime, such as accepting a bribe, then the criminal law can be applied.

    But in the more likely case where the unsuccessful party argues there has been a mistake, or even that the judge was motivated by bias or malice, the only recourse is to appeal. They can’t sue the judge.

    The High Court noted also that a judge can be removed by parliament for misbehaviour or incapacity.

    But there are counter-arguments to which the court didn’t give much attention.

    For those who feel the outcome was wrong, appealing against a decision is very expensive. It’s simply not open to most people, due to the near-disappearance of legal aid in civil cases.

    And the removal of judges by parliaments is extremely rare, while not helping the litigant anyway.

    Is this good public policy?

    In other walks of professional life, indemnity insurance exists. If judges could be sued, but were insured, they would normally not pay compensation personally. And if they could not find insurance, perhaps something needs investigating.

    A compromise position would be possible. Any legal action against a judge could have to exceed a certain threshold of severity to proceed.

    For example, a plaintiff might have to obtain prior permission, and for that they might have to prove malice on the part of the judge or an error so extreme that the judge had been reckless, not merely negligent.

    But courts are different, it seems. Litigants do not make a contract with courts and are not consumers of a court’s services. They are engaging in a public process, where bigger issues are in play.

    The public policy arguments so resoundingly endorsed by the High Court aren’t based on data about what the public thinks, or would necessarily think if all the arguments were presented to them.

    None of this has improved Mr (or Mrs) Stradford’s financial position. No one is going to compensate them.

    Courts are, in a very real sense, a law unto themselves.

    Stephen Parker does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. Should you be allowed to sue a judge? The High Court says no – https://theconversation.com/should-you-be-allowed-to-sue-a-judge-the-high-court-says-no-249939

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI United Nations: Humanitarians underscore need for urgent and sustained support in Gaza

    Source: United Nations 2

    Humanitarian Aid

    As the UN and partners continue to deliver life-saving assistance across the Gaza Strip, the scale of needs remains overwhelming, requiring urgent and sustained support, UN aid coordination office OCHA said on Monday. 

    OCHA cited Gaza’s Ministry of Health which stressed that oxygen supplies are critically needed to keep emergency, surgical and intensive care services running at hospitals, including Al Shifa and Al Rantisi hospitals in Gaza City. 

    Health partners are engaging with the authorities to bring in generators, spare parts and equipment required to produce oxygen locally in Gaza,” the agency said. 

    Shelter and education

    Over the weekend, humanitarian partners working in the shelter sector distributed tarpaulins to more than 11,000 families in the north. 

    In Khan Younis, some 450 families are receiving sealing-off kits to create short-term shelters, kitchen sets and hygiene kits at the displacement site of Al Mawasi.  

    Educational activities also continue to expand, and more than 250,000 children have enrolled in distance learning programmes run by the UN Palestine refugee agency, UNRWA.

    Some 95 per cent of school buildings across Gaza were damaged over the past 15 months of hostilities, according to UN partners working in the education sector. Students are currently attending classes in makeshift tents and open spaces, amid winter temperatures.  

    West Bank hostilities

    OCHA also reported on the situation in the West Bank, where casualties continue to be reported due to the ongoing operations by Israeli forces in Tulkarm and Jenin.          

    “These are the most extensive Israeli operations in the West Bank in two decades, causing high casualties and significant displacement, especially in refugee camps,” the agency noted.

    Critical infrastructure has also been severely damaged, driving humanitarian needs even higher.

    OCHA once again warned that the use of lethal, war-like tactics during these operations raises concerns over the use of force that exceeds law enforcement standards. 

    Settler attacks against Palestinians and their properties also continue to be reported across the West Bank. Israeli settlers attacked residents in several villages in Nablus governorate over the weekend – in one instance, setting a house on fire. 

    Humanitarians are mobilizing resources to support affected communities, OCHA said.

    Averting UNRWA collapse

    The head of UNRWA warned on Monday that if the agency collapses it will create a vacuum in the occupied Palestinian territory and send shockwaves through neighbouring countries.

    Commissioner-General Philippe Lazzarini was speaking in Cairo at the Fourth Meeting of the Global Alliance for the Implementation of the Two-State Solution.

    He said Israeli legislation targeting UNRWA’s operations is now being implemented.

    Last October, Israel’s parliament, the Knesset, adopted two bills banning UNRWA from working in Israeli territory and enforcing a no-contact policy between national authorities and agency representatives. The laws took effect in January.

    Threat to peace and stability 

    Mr. Lazzarini warned against allowing UNRWA to “implode” due to the Knesset legislation and the suspension of funding by key donors. 

    An environment in which children are deprived of education, and people lack access to basic services, is fertile ground for exploitation and extremism” he said.  “This is a threat to peace and stability in the region and beyond.”

    He said that alternatively, UNRWA could progressively conclude its mandate within the framework of a political process like that championed by the Global Alliance.

    The agency would gradually transition its public-like services to empowered and prepared Palestinian institutions. This is the future for which we are preparing,” he said. 

    MIL OSI United Nations News

  • MIL-OSI United Nations: Committee on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women Holds Half-Day General Discussion on Gender Stereotypes

    Source: United Nations – Geneva

    The Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women today held a half-day general discussion on its proposed general recommendation on gender stereotypes.

    In opening remarks, Nahla Haidar, Committee Chairperson, said gender stereotypes created false beliefs, inhibitive gender roles and discrimination. The Committee hoped to prepare guidelines that would help States to address these stereotypes, and counter myths and common excuses as to why gender stereotypes continued to be perpetuated, such as cultural and religious reasons.

    Peggy Hicks, Director, Thematic Engagement, Special Procedures and Right to Development Division, United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, said in introductory remarks that the general recommendation would provide guidance on State obligations to address gender stereotypes as root causes of gender-based discrimination.  She expressed hope that it would strengthen standards, principles and guidance to eliminate all forms of gender stereotypes.

    In her introductory remarks, Natalia Kanem, Executive Director, United Nations Population Fund, said that currently, around the world, there were immense pushbacks against women and girls in all their diversity.  In this uncertain moment, all parties needed to stand with women and engage actively in developing this general recommendation.  The work of the Committee saved and transformed lives; it needed to continue.

    Nyaradzayi Gumbonzvanda, Deputy Executive Director, United Nations Women, said gender stereotypes were barriers to the human rights of women and girls.  They restricted education, jobs, leadership, health and justice, fuelling inequality and violence, silencing women and denying freedoms.  General recommendation 41 presented a decisive opportunity to dismantle gender stereotypes at their core.

    Bandana Rana and Rhoda Reddock, Committee Experts and Co-Chairs of the Committee Working Group on gender stereotypes, also made introductory statements, calling on all stakeholders to support and provide input for the general recommendation.

    After the introductory remarks, the Committee held a panel discussion on gender stereotypes, hearing presentations from Adriana Quinones, Head, Human Rights and Development, United Nations Women; Joni van de Sand, Global MenEngage Alliance; Paola Daher, Women Deliver; Alexandra Xanthaki, United Nations Special Rapporteur in the field of cultural rights; and Marwa Sharafeldin, Musawah.

    Following the panel discussion, States parties, United Nations agencies, and civil society representatives delivered oral statements. Speaking were Malta, Andorra, Poland, Canada, Vanuatu, Cyprus, Japan, Chile, Maldives, Ukraine, Austria, Azerbaijan, United Arab Emirates, Mexico, Bulgaria, Israel, Venezuela, Bolivia, Spain, United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization and Nepal.

    Also speaking were Consortium for Intersectional Justice, Observatorio Iberoamericano Contra la Violencia de Género, Duch Cedaw Network, WILPF, Center for Reproductive Rights, European Network of Migrant Women, Tania Sordo Ruz, Nordic Model Now, and Ilga World.

    The Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women’s ninetieth session is being held from 3 to 21 February.  All documents relating to the Committee’s work, including reports submitted by States parties, can be found on the session’s webpage.  Meeting summary releases can be found here.  The webcast of the Committee’s public meetings can be accessed via the UN Web TV webpage.

    The Committee will next meet at 5 p.m. on Friday, 21 February to close its ninetieth session.

    Introductory Remarks

    NAHLA HAIDAR, Committee Chair, welcomed all participants to the meeting.  She said that the Committee was mandated to issue recommendations to States parties and provide guidance on themes related to women’s rights.  The discussions to be held today would focus on the Committee’s proposed general recommendation on general stereotypes, which the Committee urged all stakeholders to support.  Gender stereotypes created false beliefs, inhibitive gender roles and discrimination.  Measures needed to be implemented to combat them.  The Committee hoped to prepare guidelines that would help States to address these stereotypes, and counter myths and common excuses as to why gender stereotypes continued to be perpetuated, such as cultural and religious reasons.

    PEGGY HICKS, Director, Thematic Engagement, Special Procedures and Right to Development Division, United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, said she could not think of a timelier topic.  The general recommendation on gender stereotypes would provide guidance on State obligations to address these stereotypes as root causes of gender-based discrimination.  She expressed hope that it would strengthen standards, principles and guidance to eliminate all forms of gender stereotypes.

    Gender stereotypes were justified under the banners of “tradition,” “culture,” “religion” or even “nature.”  They often stemmed from patriarchal systems that tolerated or affirmed unequal power relations, based on the idea that women were inferior to men.  Discriminatory practices against women and girls needed to be eliminated, regardless of their origins, including those perpetuated in the name of culture or religion.

    The impacts of gender stereotyping began in the family and were apparent in every aspect of the lives of women and girls.  Gender stereotyping normalised violence against women and girls, politicised their reproductive functions, and denied them equal participation in political life and economic opportunities.  Women who did not conform to gender stereotypes or who openly contested them were particularly exposed to discrimination, violence and criminalisation.  

    It was crucial to address stereotypes that manifested first in the family and were then perpetuated in education systems and all aspects of society, including virtual spaces.  Transforming education systems to eliminate gender stereotypes was essential; human rights-based education was a powerful tool to dispel stereotypes.

    The discussion would address the unique vulnerabilities faced by women and girls who experienced combined stereotypes based on gender and other grounds, such as ethnicity, socioeconomic status, disability and age.  The general recommendation needed to address how to rectify the impact of intersecting forms of stereotypes, resulting discriminations and corresponding State obligations.

    Gender stereotypes trapped men and boys, conditioning them to embrace harmful ideas of masculinity.  Men and boys needed to challenge unequal power relations and structures, recognising how patriarchy privileged them and how gender equality liberated all.  Combatting gender stereotypes demanded a comprehensive approach involving the transformation of laws, policies and societal structures.  

    The general recommendation would enable States parties to change and transform gender stereotypes, paving the way for the full realisation of all human rights for all women and girls.  The Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights was ready to support this work.  It had concrete analytical tools and the mandate and expertise to monitor these issues, provide technical assistance, and build the capacity of key stakeholders.

    NATALIA KANEM, Executive Director, United Nations Population Fund, said it was currently a moment of grave import for the rights of women and girls. Around the world, there were immense pushbacks against women and girls in all their diversity.  Fierce opposition was threatening progress on several fronts.  It was welcome that maternal mortality had dropped by a third, and more than 160 countries had passed laws to address domestic violence. 

    However, the United Nations Population Fund regularly heard stories like those of Amena’s, who had been informed at age 13 by her parents that she was to be married.  The Fund had helped Amena to stand up for her rights and she was able to return to school.

    Gender stereotypes perpetuated stigma and shame around girls’ sexuality, and they posed significant risks to economic and social stability, contributing to the gender wage gap. Poverty often wore the face of a woman. Stereotypes also often led to gender-based violence, particularly online.  Discrimination severely limited the participation of women and girls in the digital space.  The ripple effects of these stereotypes drove political polarisation, fractured communities and exacerbated inequality.  They contributed to a world where progress and peace were illusive. 

    Gender discrimination was compounded by factors such as age, race and disability status.  The Fund was training healthcare workers to provide non-judgemental care for women, so women could make informed choices about their bodies and lives.

    Gender stereotypes were perpetuated in all segments of society.  The Fund was empowering girls to become leaders and was working to create a digital world that was safe and accessible for everyone.  It was also working with boys and men to ensure that they were not trapped by gender stereotypes.  It would continue to support policies and programmes that aimed to address harmful social norms.  The Committee needed to formulate processes that would give women their own money, self-agency and bodily autonomy.

    In this uncertain moment, all parties needed to stand with women.  All stakeholders needed to engage actively in developing this general recommendation.  This was not the time to roll back the clock on women’s rights.  The work of the Committee saved and transformed lives. It needed to continue.

    NYARADZAYI GUMBONZVANDA, Deputy Executive Director, United Nations Women, said United Nations Women was proud to support general recommendation 41.  Gender stereotypes were barriers to the human rights of women and girls.  They restricted education, jobs, leadership, health and justice, fuelling inequality and violence, silencing women and denying freedoms.  

    Gender stereotypes’ impact was clear in politics, where women faced double standards, exclusion and relentless scrutiny.  They also fuelled violence and impunity, with women and girls too often being valued first as wives and daughters, and not as full human beings with rights.  Stereotypes further dictated economic power, with women being denied inheritance rights.

    United Nations Women commended its Member States for adopting strong regional frameworks to combat gender-based violence and discrimination, including the Belem do Para Convention, the Istanbul Convention, and the African Union Convention on Ending Violence against Women.  Commitments needed to translate into action.  Lifting reservations to the Convention, which weakened protections and kept barriers in place, was urgent.

    General recommendation 41 presented a decisive opportunity to dismantle gender stereotypes at their core.  The year 2025 marked 30 years since the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action.  It was also the final stretch toward the expiration date of the Sustainable Development Goals, which pledged to end harmful practices against women and girls. General recommendation 41 was a critical tool for transformation that needed to be acted on immediately.

    BANDANA RANA, Committee Expert and Co-Chair of the Committee Working Group on Gender Stereotypes, said the Committee, at its eighty-fourth session, had agreed to start the elaboration of a general recommendation on gender stereotypes.  Harmful gender stereotypes were one of the biggest stumbling blocks to gender equality.  They contributed to unequal representation in workplaces and policies, and contributed to gender-based violence. 

    The Convention called on States to challenge traditional norms that limited women’s’ representation in all areas of society.  The general recommendation would dismantle discriminatory stereotypes and provide guidance on addressing these stereotypes and creating a more just society.  Together, they could create more equitable societies, as envisioned by the Sustainable Development Goals.  Ms. Rana called on all stakeholders to actively contribute to the general recommendation, dismantle gender stereotypes, and build a future where everyone could thrive without barriers.

    RHODA REDDOCK, Committee Expert and Co-Chair of the Committee Working Group on Gender Stereotypes, said gender stereotypes were based on ideas, attitudes, belief systems and patriarchal structures that existed in all societies.  They reflected the notion of women being inferior to men. The Convention called on all States parties to modify social patterns and cultural practices that were based on stereotyped roles of men and women.  Stereotypes often changed, and new ones were regularly created.  Women’s structured inferiority moved with them to all activities where they predominated.  This issue was central to the equal valuing of women and men.  Ms. Reddock called on all stakeholders for support as the Committee developed the general recommendation.

    Summary of Statements by Panellists

    After the introductory remarks, the Committee held a panel discussion on gender stereotypes, hearing presentations from Adriana Quinones, Head, Human Rights and Development, United Nations Women; Joni van de Sand, Global MenEngage Alliance; Paola Daher, Women Deliver; Alexandra Xanthaki, United Nations Special Rapporteur in the field of cultural rights; and Marwa Sharafeldin, Musawah.

    Many speakers expressed concern that currently, women’s rights were under threat from those with immense power.  There was a mounting backlash against diversity, inclusion and lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex rights, and new policies and platforms for discrimination were emerging.  Stereotypes between men and women were becoming more apparent and legitimised.

    Speakers said gender stereotypes were key pillars of patriarchal domination and power. They did not emerge in a vacuum; they were used to determine roles and behaviours that conformed to power relations, and they became stubbornly resistant over time.  They had a negative impact on the full realisation of the rights of women and girls, including their rights to work, education, and sexual and reproductive health.  Persons who challenged traditional notions of the family faced discrimination.  Gender stereotypes often intersected with stereotypes related to race, class and other aspects. 

    Speakers expressed national measures implemented to address gender stereotypes and promote gender mainstreaming, and offered the Committee support in addressing gender stereotypes.

    One speaker said an increasing number of young men in the world thought that gender equality had gone too far.  Transforming stereotypes against men was crucial in advancing gender equality.  A key strategy in this regard was to promote masculinity rooted in concepts of care and environmental protection, they said. The general recommendation needed to elaborate on how transforming gender stereotypes was relevant to men and masculinities.

    Another speaker said the Committee needed to recognise that stereotypes were not perpetuated by the abstract concept of “culture”.  The general recommendation needed to recognise that women’s rights and agency came from culture.  The general recommendation needed to recognise that it was how culture was being used by elites that made it harmful. 

    The rights enshrined in the Convention belonged to all women, including lesbian, bisexual, transgender and intersex women, one speaker said.  Womanhood needed to be recognised through self-identification.  The Committee needed to continue to eradicate stereotypes in international law regarding the definition of a woman.

    One speaker said that religion, law and the family were fields where transformative change was possible to dismantle gender stereotypes.  Religion was a source of law and it affected social norms and stereotypes.  There was patriarchal religious discourse and religious discourse that promoted gender equality.  States needed to make a choice about the religious discourse used in law and practice. The speaker noted efforts to combat gender stereotypes by changing interpretations of religious texts. 

    Several speakers gave recommendations regarding the content of the general recommendation.  One speaker said it needed to have a multi-layered institutional approach that was cognisant of power relations, while another called for the general recommendation’s scope to be expanded to promote counter narratives to gender stereotypes.  Another recommendation was for full effective and meaningful participation of women and girls to be captured in the general recommendation.

    Panel Discussion

    Representatives of States, United Nations agencies and civil society then took the floor, with speakers, among other things, expressing support for the elaboration of a general recommendation on gender stereotypes that would contribute to eliminating gender stereotypes and their adverse effects on women and girls, and to promoting the rights of all women and girls.

    Many speakers said gender stereotypes impeded the participation of women in all areas of public and private life and subconsciously affected how all behaved.  Stereotypes led to the subordination of women and girls, wage gaps, discrimination and gender-based violence.  They limited the potential of women globally and progress toward Sustainable Development Goal Five.  Women and girls continued to bear the brunt of conflict and climate change.  States had a responsibility to combat these stereotypes.

    Speakers said that in many countries, there was a pushback against feminism, which was misinforming the public and slowing progress. It was imperative to prevent backsliding.  In this context, the United Nations and other international bodies needed to expand, not restrict, definitions of gender, one speaker said.

    Some speakers said that in the digital world, harmful messaging and sexist discourse were affecting women and girls.  Online pornography and prostitution promoted violence against women and perpetuated stereotypes, while online hate speech reinforced gender stereotypes, silenced women’s voices, and limited their political participation.  The Committee needed to examine how gender stereotypes permeated online discourse. Some speakers said that artificial intelligence was perpetuating and amplifying harmful gender stereotypes against women.  Measures needed to be implemented to eliminate gender biases in artificial intelligence.  One speaker called for the promotion of women’s participation in the technological sector.

    Speakers expressed support for the elimination of all harmful stereotypes against women and girls.  All parties needed to cooperate to build a fair and equitable society for women and girls.  Governments needed to recognise the crucial role of civil society organizations in protecting women’s rights and countering stereotypes.  Stereotypes needed to be recognised and countered.  Stakeholders needed to reshape restrictive masculinities and reinforce positive gender norms.  International regional frameworks, including the Convention, needed to be implemented to build a more prosperous future for all.  Encouraging social awareness of stereotypes was crucial in combatting discrimination and promoting equality.

    Some speakers said gender stereotypes were cross-cutting, affecting various marginalised groups.  Intersectionality was a necessary lens for addressing gender stereotypes.  Speakers also called on the Committee to adopt a decolonial approach and embrace indigenous approaches to women’s rights, and consider the rights of lesbian, bisexual, transgender and intersex women and girls.  One speaker said the Committee needed to oppose the patriarchy and contribute to dismantling it.

    The Committee needed to elaborate on biases in gender-based roles and their impact on society, one speaker said.  Another speaker called for the general recommendation to consider the link between stereotypes and women’s unpaid care work. The Committee needed to note the importance of awareness raising campaigns in breaking down stereotypes. One speaker said the general recommendation needed to challenge how gender stereotypes influenced security systems.

    Some speakers said the general recommendation needed to consider the cultural sensitivities of all States parties. Actions and decisions needed to align with States’ unique customs, they said.  One speaker called on the Committee to reflect on the positive influences of culture and religion on promoting women’s rights.

    Speakers presented legislative and policy initiatives to counter gender stereotypes and address intersectional discrimination; promote women’s participation in the workforce, political bodies and education, including in science, technology, engineering and maths education; revise textbooks to remove gender stereotypes; promote the access of women and girls to health and reproductive rights; combat human trafficking; repeal discriminatory laws; collect data on the prevalence of gender discrimination; promote the use of parental leave and the participation of men in care work; and empower vulnerable women.

    One speaker asked the Committee whether the general recommendation would consider the connection between unilateral coercive measures and gender stereotypes.

    Closing Remarks

    ANTTI KORKEAKIVI, Chief, Human Rights Treaties Branch, United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, expressed gratitude to all speakers for their invaluable contributions.  The dialogue had demonstrated how deeply gender stereotypes affected women and girls in all aspects of life.  The general recommendation had the potential to dismantle gender stereotypes and help women and girls to realise their potential.  The inputs of all stakeholders would inform the Committee’s efforts to elaborate the general recommendation.  The Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights looked forward to the positive impact that the general recommendation would have on the lives of women and girls globally.

    NAHLA HAIDAR, Committee Chair, said all stakeholders’ inputs had been very valuable.  This general recommendation needed to ensure that no one was excluded from protection. The Committee would consider the Convention’s perspective on intersectionality, which was captured in the Committee’s general recommendation 28.  The current general recommendation needed to meet the requirements of women and girls all over the world.  Speakers had expressed a diversity of views on the subject, and the Committee would consider all these views.  In closing, Ms. Haidar thanked all speakers that had participated in the meeting, including more than 40 States parties.

    ___________

    CEDAW.25.052E

    Produced by the United Nations Information Service in Geneva for use of the information media; not an official record.

    English and French versions of our releases are different as they are the product of two separate coverage teams that work independently.

    MIL OSI United Nations News

  • MIL-OSI United Nations: Security Council Renews Sudan Sanctions Panel, Adopting Resolution 2772 (2025) by 13 Votes in Favour, 2 Abstentions

    Source: United Nations 4

    The Security Council today extended until 12 March 2026 the mandate of the Panel of Experts tasked with assisting its Sanctions Committee concerning Sudan, requesting a final report on the Panel’s findings and recommendations by 13 January 2026.

    Adopting resolution 2772 (2025) (to be issued as document S/RES/2772(2025)) by a vote of 13 in favour to none against, with 2 abstentions (China, Russian Federation), the Council — acting under Chapter VII of the Charter of the United Nations — also requested the Panel to provide the Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolution 1591 (2005) concerning Sudan with an interim report on its activities no later than 12 August.

    Further, the Council requested the Panel to provide updates regarding its activities to that Committee every three months, also expressing its intention to review the Panel’s mandate and take appropriate action regarding its further extension no later than 12 February 2026. It also encouraged all parties, Member States and international, regional and subregional organizations to ensure continued cooperation with the Panel, as well as the safety of its members.

    Speaking after the vote, the representative of the United States — the text’s main author — emphasized that the Panel’s independent reporting will facilitate both Member States’ support for Sudan and “efforts to reach a lasting resolution to a conflict that has caused the world’s largest humanitarian crisis”.  The Panel’s reporting provides unique information crucial to stemming the flow of arms and funds, stopping the fighting and supporting a civilian-led political alternative to both the Sudanese Armed Forces and the Rapid Support Forces, he added.

    Condemning the Rapid Support Forces’ recent attack on the Zamzam refugee camp in Darfur, the representative of the United Kingdom similarly underlined the continued importance of the Panel’s reporting. While welcoming the renewal of the Panel’s mandate, she said that her delegation would have preferred to retain previous language that called on the parties to cease violations of international law and condemned attacks against civilians.  She stressed:  “It is vital that this Council remain focused on protecting civilians in Sudan, given the violence being committed against so many.”

    Several Council members expressed regret that their proposal to align the extension of the Panel of Experts’ mandate with the sanctions measures imposed on Darfur was not taken on board, noting that the former’s mandate extends beyond the latter’s expiration in September.

    “This misalignment, unique to the sanctions regime in Darfur, must be addressed by the Council,” said the representative of Guyana — also speaking for Algeria, Sierra Leone and Somalia.  Nevertheless, they voted in favour of the resolution to reaffirm their continued support for the Panel of Experts, she said, expressing concern over escalating violence, arms flows and child recruitment in Sudan.

    “These developments reinforce the need for sustained monitoring and reporting by the Panel of Experts to keep the Council informed and engaged.”  However, conflict resolution requires a range of tools, and sanction measures alone have not been universally effective in restoring international peace and security.  “There must be a clear and defined pathway for the eventual lifting of sanctions, with periodic evaluations to ensure they serve their intended purpose without causing unintended consequences,” she said.

    Pakistan’s representative also expressed regret that “another opportunity was missed to align the reporting period of the Panel of Experts with that of the sanctions regime in Darfur”, pointing to the author’s “inflexibility to accommodate a six-month extension of the Panel with an automatic extension of 12 months”.  He also voiced concern that the resolution was put to the vote without accommodating the views of all Member States.

    Echoing that, the representative of the Russian Federation said that it is “unacceptable” that the Panel has been instructed to draft reports beyond the timeline of the sanctions regime itself.  “Even any hints” of extending that regime beyond Darfur is also unacceptable, he stressed, as these measures — introduced 20 years ago — “have not benefitted the Sudanese in any way”.  He added that the Panel’s activities must be impartial, “rather than using the mandate as a battering ram against the interests of the Sudanese people and Government”.

    The representative of China, Council President for February, then spoke in his national capacity to observe that the misalignment between the renewal cycles for the Panel’s mandate and the relevant sanctions regime has existed for some time — not because of the complexity of the issue, but fundamentally a lack of political will.  “The solution is quite simple,” he said, pointing out that either the Panel’s mandate or the sanctions regime itself could be extended, once, for six months.

    MIL OSI United Nations News