NewzIntel.com

    • Checkout Page
    • Contact Us
    • Default Redirect Page
    • Frontpage
    • Home-2
    • Home-3
    • Lost Password
    • Member Login
    • Member LogOut
    • Member TOS Page
    • My Account
    • NewzIntel Alert Control-Panel
    • NewzIntel Latest Reports
    • Post Views Counter
    • Privacy Policy
    • Public Individual Page
    • Register
    • Subscription Plan
    • Thank You Page

Category: Politics

  • MIL-OSI Security: Cybersecurity Speaker Series: Preparing for Post-Quantum

    Source: National Security Agency NSA

    FORT MEADE, Md. – Cryptography is our first and last line of defense for the nation’s most sensitive systems. The quantum threat is real and it is imperative to modernize to protect these systems now.

    In the next video in the Cybersecurity Speaker Series released today, NSA’s Senior Cryptographic Authority, Dr. Adrian Stanger, and NSA’s Cryptographic Solutions Technical Director, Dr. William J. Layton, sat down with NSA’s Cybersecurity Collaboration Center Chief of Defense Industrial Base (DIB) Defense, Bailey Bickley, to discuss preparing for Post-Quantum.

    “In theory if you make one of these [Quantum Computers], it can solve some math problems regular computers can’t,” said Layton.  “If you were to build a very large scale one that was very reliable, that’s still some distance in the future, it could break an enormous share of all the cryptography we use in the government at home or to run the internet. Essentially the foundation of security for a lot of the world would be shaken if we didn’t do anything about that.”

    Through the Cybersecurity Speaker Series, the center highlights NSA experts to share their insights, lessons, and contributions of their work in cybersecurity. 

    Cyber is an ever-changing landscape, and part of NSA’s mission is to look out to the horizon at new technologies that will become the next generation of threats. Quantum computing will be a game changer and will introduce new and advanced threats. A “Cryptographically Relevant” Quantum Computer has the potential to break existing public key crypto according to Stanger.

     “When we talk about cryptography here, we are not just talking about breaking encryption,” said Stanger, “but also the ability to masquerade as somebody to break authentication which has a bigger and more profound effects as that allows an adversary access to systems.”

    “The real challenge is for those who are managing systems who are custom building things,” said Layton. “For all those things in the world we forget to update or have been carefully built and rarely touched getting through and finding all those places that need to be fixed over the next few years is really the big challenge we are facing.”

    We have to move out now and plan for the future. Once the first cryptographically relevant quantum computer boots up, any system not upgraded to Quantum Resistant cryptography will be susceptible to attack.

    “The take away is “don’t panic!” But plan and prepare now,” said Bickley.

    View the latest Speaker Series installment below, along with the complete series on YouTube. Follow us on Twitter/X @NSACyber and on the CCC LinkedIn showcase page to track future releases.
     
    If you’re interested in joining NSA’s team, visit http://www.intelligencecareers.gov/nsa.
     

    MIL Security OSI –

    January 23, 2025
  • MIL-Evening Report: Winston Peters’ $100 billion infrastructure fund is the right idea. Politics-as-usual is the problem

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Timothy Welch, Senior Lecturer in Urban Planning, University of Auckland, Waipapa Taumata Rau

    New Zealand’s infrastructure woes are a constant political pain point. From ageing water systems to congested roads and assets increasingly threatened by climate change, the country faces mammoth upgrading and future-proofing challenges.

    Enter Winston Peters and NZ First with a surprise proposal for a NZ$100 billion “Future Fund” dedicated to infrastructure investment. Sounds promising – but the proposal’s success will hinge on getting the details right and, more importantly, getting the politics out of infrastructure planning.

    Unveiled at NZ First’s annual convention last weekend, the idea bears striking similarities to challenges previously highlighted by urban planning and infrastructure experts.

    The country currently has an estimated infrastructure deficit of over $100 billion, which aligns eerily with the scale of Peters’ proposed fund.

    The Future Fund proposal sounds impressive on paper. Ring-fenced from political meddling and focused on national interests, it’s billed as a silver bullet for infrastructure funding problems.

    Peters claims he’s taken a page from the Singapore and Ireland playbooks – potentially breaking New Zealand’s habit of treating big infrastructure projects like they’re part of a three-year plan.

    Long-term savings

    As always, the devil is in the details – and the Future Fund is light on them. How exactly would this fund be financed? How would projects be selected and prioritised? And, crucially, how would it be insulated from the political interference it claims to avoid?

    The potential benefits are significant. Research suggests that a stable, long-term approach to infrastructure investment and better utilisation of existing assets could unlock substantial savings – potentially up to 40% of total project costs.

    A well-managed $100 billion fund could provide the certainty and consistency needed to achieve these efficiencies.

    The scale of the fund also aligns with the urgent need for a comprehensive infrastructure overhaul. From modernising water systems to expanding road and rail networks, and ensuring resilience against climate change, the required investment is indeed massive.

    Politics is the problem

    Yet the proposal faces significant hurdles, not the least of which is from NZ First’s own coalition partners.

    The National Party’s previous commitments to curb borrowing seem at odds with a fund of this magnitude. Peters argues that debt for wealth creation and infrastructure differs from debt for consumption.

    That’s a valid point, but one that may struggle to gain traction in a political environment focused on reducing overall government debt.

    The proposal also raises questions about how it would interact with existing initiatives, such as the National Investment Agency set up by Infrastructure Minister Chris Bishop. It’s unclear whether these entities would complement each other or create redundancies and inefficiencies.

    Perhaps the most critical question is whether this fund, despite its claimed independence, can rise above the political cycle. We have a long and exhausting history of proposing infrastructure for political gain, where one government’s “vital infrastructure” becomes the next’s “wasteful spending”.

    Time for a 30-year plan

    While the Future Fund could be a big move in the right direction, we must also rethink how we plan (and pay) for infrastructure completely.

    A good start would be a 30-year plan that all political parties can get behind, like the United Kingdom’s National Infrastructure Assessment. This would give us a real long-term vision rather than promises that change with each election cycle.

    We should also look at more innovative ways to fund projects. Value capture, which leverages rising property values near new infrastructure to help finance its development, helped build London’s Crossrail. And Australia is “asset recycling” from old infrastructure into new projects.

    These aren’t just theoretical ideas. They could change how we build what New Zealand needs without the risks of entirely relying on taxpayers.

    Ending the boom-bust cycle

    Efficiency must also be a priority. Time-of-use charges for roads, already implemented in cities such as Stockholm and Singapore and proposed for Auckland, could reduce congestion and wasteful spending on unnecessary road expansions.

    Volumetric charging for water, as seen in the Kāpiti Coast, can significantly reduce water waste without massive new investments.

    New Zealand could also break free from its boom-bust infrastructure cycle by establishing an agency outside the political realm to manage the cash Winston Peters is proposing.

    A truly independent infrastructure body, similar to Infrastructure Australia, could provide the continuity and expertise needed to see projects through political cycles.

    Money isn’t the only issue here. Politics is the real roadblock. Right now, every election cycle, priorities change, projects fly out the window, and the bill for desperately needed infrastructure only gets bigger.

    The Future Fund seems like a step in the right direction. But without also overhauling how we make decisions about infrastructure, it could end up being just another political football.

    Timothy Welch does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    – ref. Winston Peters’ $100 billion infrastructure fund is the right idea. Politics-as-usual is the problem – https://theconversation.com/winston-peters-100-billion-infrastructure-fund-is-the-right-idea-politics-as-usual-is-the-problem-241346

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

    January 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Speech to the Institute of Finance Professionals NZ, 2024 Conference

    Source: New Zealand Government

    Kia ora koutou

    Greetings from Wellington. I am sorry I can’t be with you in person today, but I’m delighted that I can talk to you virtually. 

    I’d like to begin by acknowledging your chair Bill Goodwin and members of your board.

    I’d also like to acknowledge the fitness of your conference theme: “Adaptability – highlighting the imperative for both corporate and government investment to be more considered and impactful in light of the financial constraints on governments and the increased costs of capital.”

    That’s quite a mouthful. But, as a finance minister who inherited a structural deficit and a challenging set of circumstances, both domestically and internationally, those are themes dear to my heart. 

    New Zealand, like other countries, has faced significant economic challenges in recent years.  Many businesses and households are doing it tough. High inflation has increased household costs and squeezed business margins.

    However, the two most recent ANZ Business Outlook surveys and the New Zealand Herald’s Mood of the Board room survey suggest you and your colleagues in the business world are increasingly positive about the outlook for the future. 

    The green shoots of business confidence are re-emerging.

    I share your optimism. 

    We’ll get the latest update on inflation tomorrow when Stats NZ releases the September quarter inflation data, but all the indications are that inflation is tracking back down to the Reserve Bank’s target range of 1 to 3 per cent. 

    Certainly, that’s the Reserve Bank’s view. It’s decision last week to drop the Official Cash rate by 50 basis points was a welcome fillip for businesses and households. 

    It followed the 25-basis point drop in August.

    Lower interest rates mean families get to keep more of their money and they increase the opportunities for businesses to invest, innovate and expand.

    How people are impacted by interest rate reductions will depend on the terms of their mortgages – whether they are floating or fixed and, if fixed, for what length of time and at what rates.  

    The good news is that right now roughly half of New Zealand’s mortgage lending is either fixed or floating for a period of six months or fewer. 

    That means the impact of a lower official cash rate will flow through to households much faster than might typically be the case. And the impact will be significant.

    To give one example, a family with a 25-year, $500,000 mortgage could expect to be just over $100 a fortnight better off if its rate dropped from 7 to 6.25 per cent.

    Add that to the tax relief that took effect on 31 July and the FamilyBoost childcare payments that many households are now receiving, and we can confidently say that large numbers of families are now significantly better off than they were a year ago.

    Budget 2024 was another important step in the right direction. It put the Government’s books on a credible path back to fiscal sustainability. 

    The Crown accounts are forecast to return to surplus in 2028 and net core Crown debt is forecast to start trending down as a percentage of gross domestic product the same year. 

    This does not mean that our financial and economic challenges have magically evaporated. It also does not mean that we can pat ourselves on the back and relax the focus that we have re-introduced on fiscal discipline.  

    Fiscal discipline is not a one-off, one-Budget affair. It is an ongoing state of mind. 

    It’s not easily achieved, but it is fundamental to our prospects.

    There is no time in recorded history in which a country has enjoyed a continuous period of economic prosperity without a stable macroeconomic environment. 

    What does that mean in practice? It means low inflation, a balance between government expenditure and revenue and a balance between domestic demand and exports. 

    In other words, governments cannot live beyond their means for sustained periods of time without damaging the future prospects of their citizens.

    Our Government doesn’t just think about constraining future government expenditure. We are equally intent on driving more value from the significant investment the Government already makes across the economy. 

    That means delivering more effective management of the considerable assets we own and making better choices about where and how we use taxpayers’ money.

    For me, the ultimate purpose of strengthening the economy and improving the state of the books is not to change the colour of the ink in those books. It is to improve outcomes for people. 

    As we look ahead, the Government is squarely focused on improving the growth prospects of the New Zealand economy.  

    Growing our economy faster requires us to improve the attractiveness of New Zealand as a launch place for business and exporting, it means attracting and retaining people who choose this as the country where they want to develop and deploy their talents, to start new businesses, to expand existing ones, to invest and drive innovation.   

    It’s a competitive world, and so New Zealand needs to constantly improve our proposition to the world. 

    As we look to the future and consider a globe grappling with challenges to climate, peace and stability, our country’s fundamentals are excellent.  

    In an unstable, hungry world, we are a peaceful, food-producing country blessed with secure borders, strong institutions, a strong sense of community, well-established trade relationships, a reputation for producing innovative and enterprising people, and abundant natural resources.

    Even so, our country has not been making the most of these advantages. 

    We still have much to do to develop our human capital, to make this a more attractive place to invest, to boost our trade with the world, to encourage innovation and harness new technologies, to ensure we have a foundation of world-class infrastructure, and to reduce the regulatory and bureaucratic static that can hamper the deployment of good ideas.

    The Government’s reform agenda is about realising the untapped potential we see in so many dimensions of New Zealand life.    

    We know that to be successful in driving growth we need you and your colleagues in the business community on board.  

    The previous government distrusted private capital and discounted the value of private sector innovation. 

    This Government’s attitude is different. 

    We recognise that you have a critical role to play in innovating, investing and developing markets. Our role as government is to create the framework that encourages the business sector to invest, innovate, employ and take risks.  

    Accordingly, our growth agenda focuses on five key areas. 

    They are not just about the next few years, but about the next few decades. 

    First, we have to start with our people – human capital. 

    We as New Zealanders have a deserved reputation for innovating, rolling up our sleeves and getting on with things. And we still score relatively well in international education tests, but not as well as we used to. 

    That is why Education Minister Erica Stanford is refocusing the education system on the core skills that make the most difference to kids’ prospects – reading, writing and mathematics. 

    She is doing so not just to improve the economic outlook but because lifting educational achievement is the best thing we can do to address social inequality. Education has the power to transform lives.

    Making better use of our human capital also requires us to deliver more effective interventions for those citizens who may be left behind – individuals, families and communities whose lives are disrupted by difficult childhoods, educational under-achievement, unemployment, violence, crime; people whose innate human potential goes unfulfilled.  

    This is where our work in social investment comes in. Our Government wants to better harness the considerable resources New Zealand already invests in well-intended interventions for New Zealanders in need. 

    We want to devolve more power to the non-government organisations and iwi who often know better how to deliver for the needs of their community, and who are eager to act on data and evidence about what works for who.

    Our social investment agency is now up and running, is developing prototype social investment contracts, designing a social investment fund and working across Government to take a more rigorous approach to the social investments we make. 

    Second of the themes in our reform agenda is trade and investment. 

    Congratulations to Trade Minister Todd McClay for last month concluding the negotiations for New Zealand’s fastest-ever free trade agreement with the United Arab Emirates. 

    The negotiations, which will save New Zealand exporters millions of dollars, took just four months. 

    There will be more agreements to come. 

    And we are looking not just at growing our exports, but, equally importantly, at improving capital flows into New Zealand. 

    The Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (the OECD) has identified our foreign investment regime as one of the most restrictive in the developed world. 

    As a result, our stock of foreign direct investment is equivalent to about 40 per cent of GDP which compares to the OECD average of about 50 per cent. 

    This low level of investment not only reduces our opportunities to grow, it also slows our access to frontier technologies like artificial intelligence which are changing the way our competitors and trading partners operate. 

    Foreign direct investment is recognised as a key vector for the transfer of cutting-edge technology.  

    We’ve taken initial steps to address this imbalance. Earlier this year Associate Finance Minister David Seymour directed the Overseas Investment Office to administer the overseas investment regime in a way that:

    • minimised compliance costs; 
    • imposed a burden no broader than necessary; and
    • expedited application processes. 

    As a result, every consent application received and processed after his directive came into effect on 6 June has been decided in under half of the statutory timeframe.

    You can expect to hear more from us on this. 

    The Government will make a new round of significant reforms to the Overseas Investment Act next year. We want to put out the welcome mat to investors who want to help grow this country.  

    Third, science and innovation. 

    New Zealand has a proud history of scientific innovation and putting those innovations to good use. 

    In the 1880s the foundations of the New Zealand meat and dairy products industries were laid by the entrepreneurs who took advantage of developments in refrigeration technology to successfully ship frozen meat and dairy products to Britain for the first time. 

    More recently, Sir Peter Jackson, Dame Fran Walsh and Sir Richard Taylor have made Wellington the global centre of film special effects, Sir Peter Beck’s Rocket Lab is leading the world in the development of small, low-cost rockets and the development of a disease resistant strain of golden kiwifruit by scientists at Plant and Food Research has turbo-charged the kiwifruit industry. 

    I could go on – Ernest Rutherford, the Hamilton jetboat, bungy jumping… you get the picture. We need more of this sort of innovation. 

    The Government is doing its part.

    Judith Collins as Science, Innovation and Technology Minister, has announced the outdated, effective ban on gene technology will be scrapped by the end of next year. 

    Doing so will enable researchers and companies to further develop and commercialise their innovative products, improve health outcomes and help New Zealand to adapt to climate change. Ending the ban has the potential to deliver massive economic benefits to New Zealand.

    Judith is overseeing a shake-up of the state science system to better focus it on our economic needs and commercial opportunities.  

    And she is championing efforts to increase the uptake of artificial intelligence by New Zealand businesses as well as efforts to make it easier for businesses and people wanting to interact with government agencies to access government information and support by using AI. 

    Wearing another of his hats, Todd McClay announced earlier this year as agriculture minister that the Government was partnering with the a2 Milk Company, ANZ and ASB to put another $18 million into AgriZero, the joint venture established to boost New Zealand’s efforts to reduce agricultural emissions. 

    The injection took total funding for AgriZero to $183 million over its first four years, half of which is coming from the Crown. This public-private partnership approach is one we want to build on. 

    Fourth, regulation and competition. 

    It sounds dry but removing red tape and making this an easier place in which to get things done really matters, from fixing up the Credit Contracts and Consumer Finance Act (CCCFA), to improving building consent processes to having more pro-competitive prudential regulation.

    One of the most significant regulatory reforms our Government is making is removing the burden that the Resource Management Act has imposed on New Zealand. 

    That law has held back housing development, pushed the dream of home ownership out of reach of many young Kiwis, inhibited development and held back productivity and growth. 

    We are fixing the Act, and we have started with the fast-track regime announced by Infrastructure Minister Chris Bishop which will speed up consenting for 149 housing, infrastructure, renewable energy, mining, aquaculture, farming, and quarrying projects. 

    In the process, the new regime will deliver measurable benefits to regional New Zealand and help to stimulate growth nationally. 

    Fixing the Act does not mean we are throwing away environmental protections. But it does mean we are getting rid of the unnecessary red tape and delays that have held New Zealand back. 

    Improving New Zealand’s competition settings is equally important. In its most recent survey of the New Zealand economy, the OECD highlighted the importance of this work, given the small size of our population and the tendency for sectors to become dominated by a small clutch of players.

    International experience shows that competition is one of the most important drivers of long-term growth and productivity.   

    You’ll have seen that our Government is taking up the recommendations of the recent Commerce Commission inquiry into banking competition.  

    We are concerned that the two-tier oligopoly has meant Kiwis are missing out on the competitive pricing and services they deserve from their banks.

    I have asked the Treasury to engage with Kiwibank’s parent company on options for raising new capital to enable it to be a more disruptive competitor for the big four banks. 

    Potential sources of investment include KiwiSaver funds, New Zealand investments funds and everyday New Zealanders. I will take proposals to Cabinet later this year. 

    We are also alive to challenges in the grocery and electricity sectors. 

    Finally, infrastructure. 

    New Zealand has an infrastructure deficit that is holding back productivity and that has been worsened by a poor track record of planning, consenting and delivering major projects. 

    We’re working to fix that, by implementing tried and true approaches from more successful economies.

    We hear what business is saying. You want an enduring framework and an enduring pipeline. So do we, and we are applying lessons learned in Australia to our infrastructure reforms. 

    One of these is the importance of bipartisanship. Given the long-term nature of investment in infrastructure it is desirable to have as much buy-in as possible from different political parties. 

    To that end, Infrastructure Minister Chris Bishop has written to the infrastructure spokespeople of each party represented in Parliament inviting them to be briefed by the Infrastructure Commission on the development of a 30-year National Infrastructure Plan.

    Chris is also proposing that Parliament hold an annual special debate on the plan. The debate won’t change the content of the plan because it will be developed independently, but the debate will show where parties agree, where we don’t, and where there is room for compromise in the best interests of New Zealanders. 

    It will come as no surprise to you to hear, that a National-led government sees private capital as key to funding our ambitious work programme and closing New Zealand’s infrastructure gap faster. 

    We are currently in the process of refreshing the policy frameworks that enable private capital to invest in Crown infrastructure. 

    This includes the public private partnership (PPP) framework and unsolicited proposals guidance. We look forward to working further with you on the development of the pipeline.  

    I’ll stop now to leave some time for questions. 

    You can see from the steps we’ve taken and the priorities I’ve outlined that this is a government that is hungry and ambitious for New Zealand. 

    We feel your sense of urgency, we value your expertise, connections and energy, and we want you on board as we seek to tap New Zealand’s untapped potential. 

    You want bold and I want it too. 

    Together, let’s make this the best country in the world in which to do business and raise our families. 

    MIL OSI New Zealand News –

    January 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI China: Chinese FM calls for complete, permanent ceasefire in Gaza, release of hostages

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    BEIJING, Oct. 14 — Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi on Monday called for an immediate, complete and permanent ceasefire in Gaza and the release of all hostages.

    Wang, also a member of the Political Bureau of the Communist Party of China Central Committee, made the remarks during a telephone call with Israeli Foreign Minister Israel Katz. Wang also called for unimpeded access of humanitarian aid to Gaza.

    Wang said that the international community is deeply worried about the prolonged escalation of conflict in the Middle East.

    Noting that all lives are equally precious, regardless of nationality or ethnicity, Wang said that the humanitarian disaster in Gaza must end and that countering violence with violence cannot truly address the legitimate concerns of all parties.

    Pointing out that the conflict in Gaza has once again demonstrated that the Palestinian question remains a core issue in the Middle East, Wang said the voices of the international community are clear, which hope all parties return to the political path of a “two-state solution” as soon as possible. Doing so would realize the peaceful coexistence of Israel and Palestine and the harmonious coexistence of the Jewish and Arab peoples. This is the right way to achieve stability and lasting security for all parties, including Israel, Wang said.

    Wang said that China is highly concerned about the tension between Israel and Iran and believes that renewed conflict and turmoil in the region serves the interests of no one.

    Wang stated that China urges all parties to proceed with caution to prevent falling into a vicious circle. He said China is not self-interested in the Middle East and never engages in geopolitical contests.

    As a permanent member of the United Nations Security Council, China has always stood on the side of peace, international law and truth and will continue to play a constructive role in de-escalating the situation and restoring peace in the region, Wang said.

    Wang stressed that United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) is mandated by Security Council resolutions to carry out peacekeeping missions, adding that the Israeli side should take concrete measures to ensure the safety of UNIFIL personnel.

    The two sides also exchanged views on China-Israel relations. Katz said that developing relations with China is an established policy in Israel and serves the common interests of the two countries, adding that the Israeli government abides by its consistent position on the Taiwan question.

    Wang said that China maintains continuity and stability in its policy toward Israel and is willing to resume exchanges in all aspects as soon as possible when the situation eases and promote the sustainable development of the innovative comprehensive partnership between the two countries.

    Wang said he hopes the Israeli side will take effective measures to ensure the safety of Chinese institutions and nationals in Israel.

    MIL OSI China News –

    January 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI China: China to play constructive role in cooling down Mideast conflict — FM

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    BEIJING, Oct. 14 — Concerning the regional tensions in the Middle East, China will continue to demonstrate a sense of duty as a responsible major country and play a constructive role in promoting the cooling down of the conflict, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi said Monday.

    Wang, also a member of the Political Bureau of the Communist Party of China Central Committee, made the remarks in a phone call with Iranian Foreign Minister Seyyed Abbas Araghchi.

    The two sides spoke highly of China-Iran relations, emphasizing a commitment to maintaining exchanges at all levels and promoting practical cooperation.

    Araghchi said Iran is deeply concerned about the risk of an overall escalation of the current regional situation and does not want to see a further expansion of conflict.

    Iran highly values China’s influence in international affairs and is willing to strengthen communication and coordination with China to cool down the situation through diplomatic means, Araghchi said, adding that Israel should avoid taking risks and proceed cautiously.

    Wang said that the negative impacts of the current Gaza conflict are clearly spilling over, and regional tensions are escalating continuously.

    China has always advocated for resolving hotspot issues through dialogue and consultation and opposes exacerbating tensions, expanding conflicts and taking military adventures, Wang said, calling on all parties to make more efforts to safeguard regional peace and stability.

    Wang said that China will proceed from the merits of the issue, strengthen communication among all parties, build a broader international consensus, and pool the strengths of all parties.

    Wang said that China is pleased to see the Iranian government carry out mediation diplomacy, enhance understanding with relevant parties and improve relations with regional countries.

    China supports the historic reconciliation between Iran and Saudi Arabia, and is willing to jointly push for a positive outcome from the second meeting of the China-Iran-Saudi Arabia Trilateral Joint Committee to consolidate the momentum of reconciliation between Iran and Saudi Arabia and inject positive energy into regional peace and stability, Wang added.

    MIL OSI China News –

    January 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI China: China to play constructive role in cooling down Mideast conflict

    Source: China State Council Information Office

    Concerning the regional tensions in the Middle East, China will continue to demonstrate a sense of duty as a responsible major country and play a constructive role in promoting the cooling down of the conflict, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi said Monday.

    Wang, also a member of the Political Bureau of the Communist Party of China Central Committee, made the remarks in a phone call with Iranian Foreign Minister Seyyed Abbas Araghchi.

    The two sides spoke highly of China-Iran relations, emphasizing a commitment to maintaining exchanges at all levels and promoting practical cooperation.

    Araghchi said Iran is deeply concerned about the risk of an overall escalation of the current regional situation and does not want to see a further expansion of conflict.

    Iran highly values China’s influence in international affairs and is willing to strengthen communication and coordination with China to cool down the situation through diplomatic means, Araghchi said, adding that Israel should avoid taking risks and proceed cautiously.

    Wang said that the negative impacts of the current Gaza conflict are clearly spilling over, and regional tensions are escalating continuously.

    China has always advocated for resolving hotspot issues through dialogue and consultation and opposes exacerbating tensions, expanding conflicts and taking military adventures, Wang said, calling on all parties to make more efforts to safeguard regional peace and stability.

    Wang said that China will proceed from the merits of the issue, strengthen communication among all parties, build a broader international consensus, and pool the strengths of all parties.

    Wang said that China is pleased to see the Iranian government carry out mediation diplomacy, enhance understanding with relevant parties and improve relations with regional countries.

    China supports the historic reconciliation between Iran and Saudi Arabia, and is willing to jointly push for a positive outcome from the second meeting of the China-Iran-Saudi Arabia Trilateral Joint Committee to consolidate the momentum of reconciliation between Iran and Saudi Arabia and inject positive energy into regional peace and stability, Wang added.

    MIL OSI China News –

    January 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Old Papatoetoe, new vibes

    Source: Auckland Council

    Exciting changes are on the horizon as the plan to revitalise Old Papatoetoe town centre kicks off – and it’s set to be a game changer!

    The plan introduces fresh vibes for the area to enliven Old Papatoetoe town centre, boost local business and provide new homes, marking significant investment in the area.

    Manukau Ward Councillor Lotu Fuli says, “It’s encouraging to see the progress made that will ensure the council can continue to meet the needs of our city and South Auckland. Old Papatoetoe is strategically located next to Manukau City and offers significant regeneration opportunities in the town centre, thanks to large areas of underutilised council-owned land.”

    Fellow Manukau Ward Councillor Alf Filipaina shares, “Having been a councillor at Manukau City Council from 2003, it is pleasing to see the progress in Old Papatoetoe. With robust infrastructure, essential services, and excellent access to public transport, I’m looking forward to the transformation over the next few years.”

    The plan, led by Eke Panuku Development Auckland, aims to enhance safety, accessibility, and economic growth, breathing new life into the historic area. 

    Council invested a record $3.2 billion last year in assets such as the roads, pipes and buildings, and Ōtara-Papatoetoe Local Board chair Apulu Reece Autagavaia is thrilled to see Old Papatoetoe town centre, included in this significant investment.

    Apulu says, “Revitalising Old Papatoetoe is a key part of our local board plan. Old Papatoetoe will be a popular place to live, to shop, for people to meet and enjoy themselves, and will provide the services and facilities the community needs. It also boasts convenient access to Puhinui Station and Middlemore Train Stations, making it highly desirable for commuters and travellers alike.

    “It’s a beautiful area with a unique character, featuring stunning art deco buildings. Currently, the town centre spans 12 hectares, and this plan aims to address its underutilisation.”

    The plan

    Housing

    Piko Toetoe development is underway.

    The site is located behind the St George Street shops and bordered by the Papatoetoe New World, Allan Brewster Leisure Centre and the rail line.

    Piko Toetoe.

    Board deputy chair Vi Hausia explains, “Old Papatoetoe has significant capacity to accommodate further growth and would benefit from new investment, as we see more and more diverse families making Papatoetoe their new home.

    “It’s especially encouraging to see mana whenua actively engaged in reinforcing and incorporating the narrative and cultural heritage of the region into this.”

    At 91 Cambridge Terrace, an underutilised council property has now been developed into 29 new homes by the New Zealand Housing Foundation who support families into home ownership.

    Public space

    The upgrade of Chambers Laneway is underway and on track to be complete by Christmas. Notably, it will feature a statement mana whenua designed, mural. The theme of the mural is the ‘Bittern’, a native bird that used to be found in wetlands in the area but is now extinct.

    Chambers Laneway once complete. Image source: Eke Panuku.

    Cambridge Terrace extension, also led by Eke Panuku, will begin in November 2024.

    This new street will extend Cambridge Terrace, linking the upgraded Chambers Laneway and Piko Toetoe development to Stadium Reserve, improving access and connectivity between Papatoetoe and Puhinui train stations.

    Cambridge Terrace. Image source: Eke Panuku.

    The Stadium Reserve upgrade, scheduled to begin in early 2025, will feature a new playground, a basketball half court, and improved green spaces. Alongside the nearby Allan Brewster Leisure Centre, this upgrade will create a vibrant hub for community activities.

    Through the design process, mana whenua provided the narrative ‘The Mists of Kohuora’.

    For more details on this, visit the Eke Panuku Old Papatoetoe webpage.

    Stay connected

    Sign up for our Ōtara-Papatoetoe Local Board e-newsletter and get it delivered to your inbox each month.

    MIL OSI New Zealand News –

    January 23, 2025
  • MIL-Evening Report: Are market giants endangering Australia’s live music scene? Industry veterans and local artists are worried

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Ben Green, Research Fellow, Centre for Social and Cultural Research, Griffith University

    Multinational concert promoter Live Nation Entertainment has come under fire, with an ABC Four Corners investigation saying its unprecedented market power is open to abuse.

    The report follows concerns about the introduction of dynamic pricing – where ticket prices change according to demand – to the Australian concert market. A parliamentary inquiry into the live music sector is also underway.

    Industry luminaries such as Peter Garrett and Michael Chugg told the ABC that Australia’s music scene is under threat, echoing the concerns of frustrated bands and fans. Live Nation issued a statement ahead of the program, calling it inaccurate and unbalanced.

    So what is Live Nation and how is market concentration affecting our music scene?

    The business

    Live music is one of our most popular forms of cultural participation, engaging almost half of Australians over 15. In the decade before COVID, ticket buying and revenue for contemporary music doubled.

    Ticket revenue doubled again in the year 2022–23 to well above pre-pandemic levels. How can such growth be squared against widespread talk of a sector in crisis, with venues closing and festivals cancelled?

    This is because the growth is top-heavy. Overall figures have been boosted by an influx of stadium concerts by international superstars such as Taylor Swift and Ed Sheeran. Rising revenue outpaced attendance growth by almost three to one, with average ticket prices rising 47.4% to A$128.21. Market power is increasingly concentrated in a few corporate hands, notably Live Nation Entertainment.

    ‘We’re in an extinction event right now.’

    What is Live Nation?

    Live Nation began in the United States as a concert promoter. Traditionally, a promoter funds and arranges live events, negotiating with artists, their agents, venues and ticketing services. But Live Nation has integrated many such components into its operations. Now, everything from artist management to venues and merchandise can be done in-house.

    In 2010, the US Department of Justice allowed the merger of Live Nation with major ticketing company Ticketmaster. The resulting entity, Live Nation Entertainment, has since acquired a growing set of interests internationally.

    Live Nation’s acquisitions over the past decade in Australia include:

    • Michael Coppel Presents

    • Secret Sounds Group, which promotes Splendour in the Grass and Falls Festival in addition to touring, sponsorship, PR and artist management businesses (the acquisition excluded Secret Sounds record labels and venues)

    • Moshtix, billed as Australia’s leading provider of general admission tickets for unreserved or standing-room events

    • Mellen Events, a leading Western Australian concert promoter

    • Kicks Entertainment, which operates Spilt Milk festival

    • Face to Face Touring, a regional promoter with events including Red Hot Summer, SummerSalt and By the C.

    Live Nation Entertainment also acquired venues, leasing Melbourne’s Palais Theatre for 30 years from 2017 and Festival Hall. The group purchased Anita’s Theatre in Thirroul in 2022 and opened Brisbane’s Fortitude Music Hall (2020) and Adelaide’s Hindley Street Music Hall (2022) in partnership with local entities.

    Ticketmaster is the authorised ticketing agency for Melbourne’s Marvel Stadium and for Australian tours promoted by Live Nation. These include concerts by Oasis, Green Day, P!nk and Red Hot Chili Peppers.

    Live Nation has also acquired several Australian booking agencies, including Village Sounds, which represents Bernard Fanning, Courtney Barnett and Vance Joy.

    The only competitors are TEG (which owns Ticketek) and AEG-Frontier. Music industry stakeholders are concerned about the oversized influence of these three “corporate giants”.

    Keeping the shareholders happy

    For consumers, a lack of competition can mean higher prices. Dynamic pricing made headlines, but Four Corners also alleged there were a range of “hidden fees” in the price of tickets ordinarily sold by Ticketmaster and Ticketek.

    Artists are at a disadvantage when negotiating with a mass of connected businesses that are often owned by one entity and which sometimes includes their own agent.

    South Australian rock band Bad//Dreems told the ABC they were left with just $9,000 from a tour that grossed $100,000.

    Veteran promoter Michael Chugg complained major artists were being overpaid, skewing the sector to the detriment of local musicians. While Australian promoters, including Chugg and the late Michael Gudinski, have a history of consolidating interests and crowding out competition, they also had skin in the Australian music game. Live Nation is a publicly listed company with duties to its shareholders, including US hedge funds and Saudi royalty.

    Midnight Oil singer and former politician Peter Garrett said this meant there was “no loyalty” to Australian artists. A multinational promoter with a shareholder-driven approach might be more likely to cancel a festival after weak opening sales, instead of weathering short-term losses to preserve the brand and relationships.

    That cancellation might even consolidate demand for the company’s upcoming headline tours. But opportunities are lost for Australian artists, businesses and culture.

    What can be done?

    Federal Arts Minister Tony Burke told Four Corners he has put Live Nation on notice and warned the company not to use its power in an anti-competitive way. But he did not commit to legislative change.

    In the United States, the Department of Justice and dozens of states have sued Live Nation for antitrust, seeking “to break up Live Nation-Ticketmaster’s monopoly and restore competition for the benefit of fans and artists”.

    Australian courts currently have no power to break up monopolies without new legislation. However, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission can investigate and prosecute misuse of market power, as alleged by some in this case.

    Fair trading authorities in the United Kingdom and Europe are examining Ticketmaster’s dynamic pricing in the wake of the Oasis ticket-pricing controversy. However, Burke said surge pricing is something consumers have always dealt with, and “not something we’re looking at, at the moment”.

    Governments could also regulate more transparency in ticket fees, as well as the rights of artists, who sit uncomfortably between employees and small businesses. Their union, MEAA’s Musicians Australia, is currently advocating about these matters.

    Those passionate about Australia’s live music scene fear that if the sector isn’t better regulated, it’ll soon be too late to save it.

    Ben Green receives research funding from the Australian Research Council and the Australasian Performing Right Association.

    Sam Whiting receives funding from RMIT University and the Winston Churchill Trust.

    – ref. Are market giants endangering Australia’s live music scene? Industry veterans and local artists are worried – https://theconversation.com/are-market-giants-endangering-australias-live-music-scene-industry-veterans-and-local-artists-are-worried-241244

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

    January 23, 2025
  • MIL-Evening Report: Speakers, vacuums, doorbells and fridges – the government plans to make your ‘smart things’ more secure

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Abu Barkat ullah, Associate Professor of Cyber Security, University of Canberra

    gorodenkoff/Shutterstock

    The Australian government has introduced its first-ever standalone cyber security act. Along with two other cyber security bills, it’s currently being reviewed by a parliamentary committee.

    Among the act’s many provisions are mandatory “minimum cyber security standards for smart devices”.

    This marks a crucial step in defending the digital lives of Australians. So what devices would it apply to? And what can you do right now to protect your smart devices from cyber criminals?

    Smart devices are everywhere

    The new legislation aims to cover a wide range of smart devices – products that can connect to the internet in some way.

    This includes “internet-connectable” products – think smartphones, laptops, tablets, smart TVs and gaming consoles. It also includes indirect “network-connectable” products, which can send and receive data. This means things like smart home devices and appliances, wearables (smart watches, fitness trackers), smart vacuums and many more.

    Simple electronic devices that don’t connect to the internet or can’t store or process sensitive data are not included.

    According to one study, 7.6 million Australian households – more than 70% – had at least one smart home device by the end of 2023, and 3 million of those households had more than five.

    To work as well as they do, smart devices typically collect, store and share data. This can include sensitive personal information, health data and geo-location data, making them attractive targets for cyber criminals.

    A notorious example is the Mirai botnet in 2016, when cyber criminals infected more than 600,000 devices such as cameras, home routers, and video players globally to use them in massively disruptive network attacks, known as a distributed denial-of-service (DDoS).

    Even implantable medical devices, such as pacemakers and insulin pumps, can have security flaws that could be exploited.

    Just last week, the ABC reported that one of the world’s largest home robotics companies has failed to address security issues in its robot vacuums despite warnings from the previous year.

    The consequences of such vulnerabilities can be even more dangerous when smart devices are part of critical infrastructure. As these devices become more interconnected, a breach in one can compromise entire networks, amplifying the security risks.

    What will be the ‘minimum’ security standards?

    The new cyber security act provides for “mandatory security standards” for smart devices. It establishes the legal framework for enforcing these standards, but doesn’t explicitly outline the technical details smart devices must meet. In the past the Department of Home Affairs has suggested that Australia consider adopting an international security standard, such as ETSI EN 303 645.

    The bill’s focus is on securing connected devices to protect users from internet-based threats, vulnerabilities and risks.

    In practice, this means manufacturers will have to ensure their products meet these minimum security standards and provide a statement of compliance. And suppliers will have to include statements of compliance with the product, and will be forbidden from selling non-compliant products.

    All this will be enforced through the Secretary of Home Affairs, who can issue compliance, stop, or recall notices for violations of these rules.

    You can do your bit to stay safe

    The proposed cyber security act is a significant step forward in protecting Australians from the growing threat of cyber attacks on smart devices.

    But this may only apply to new devices or ones still receiving updates from manufacturers. Exact details on how the legislation will apply to existing devices will be determined by the government agency responsible for its implementation.

    “Legacy” devices with outdated software – older products that are no longer supported and don’t receive the latest security patches – are particularly vulnerable to cyber attacks.

    While the government works on introducing the new cyber security laws, there are several things you can do to protect your smart devices:

    • set up a strong wifi password to prevent unauthorised access to your home network
    • create a dedicated, more secure wifi network for smart home devices
    • always install security patches and updates promptly
    • create unique and complex passwords for each account
    • where possible, use two-factor authentication to add an extra layer of security
    • disable unnecessary features or permissions, and be mindful of the information you share with apps and devices
    • make sure you understand how your data is collected and used by apps and devices.

    By mandating minimum cyber security standards and providing for effective enforcement mechanisms, Australia’s new cyber security act will help keep consumer devices safer.

    However, it’s important to note that as technology continues to evolve rapidly, the cyber crime ecosystem is also expanding. The global cost of cyber crime is projected to reach US$9.5 trillion in 2024.

    Given the dynamic nature of cyber threats, relying solely on standards may not be sufficient to address all potential risks. New vulnerabilities are discovered regularly, and it’s essential for every one of us to remain vigilant and practice good cyber hygiene by following the tips above.

    Abu Barkat ullah does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    – ref. Speakers, vacuums, doorbells and fridges – the government plans to make your ‘smart things’ more secure – https://theconversation.com/speakers-vacuums-doorbells-and-fridges-the-government-plans-to-make-your-smart-things-more-secure-241057

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

    January 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Economics: Media release: Opposition’s pledge to include gas in Capacity Investment Scheme welcomed – Australian Energy Producers

    Source: Australian Petroleum Production & Exploration Association

    Headline: Media release: Opposition’s pledge to include gas in Capacity Investment Scheme welcomed – Australian Energy Producers

    Opposition’s pledge to include gas in Capacity Investment Scheme welcomed 

    Australian Energy Producers welcomes the Federal Opposition’s plan to include gas in the Capacity Investment Scheme (CIS) to help secure urgently needed investment in gas power generation capacity. 

    Australian Energy Producers Chief Executive Samantha McCulloch said the announcement sent a strong signal about the critical, long-term role of gas in Australia’s energy mix and would redress a policy failure of omitting gas from the scheme.  

    “The energy market operator recently highlighted that the National Electricity Market will need an additional 13 GW of new gas power generation to be built by 2050 as part of the least-cost transition, underscoring the increasingly important role of gas for Australia’s energy security,” she said. 

    “Australia urgently needs investment in new gas supply and infrastructure, and the CIS is an important lever to support this necessary investment.” 

    “Amid an increasingly difficult regulatory and investment environment in Australia, the Coalition has recognised the critical role of gas and the need for more supply to ensure reliable and affordable energy for households and businesses.” 

    Today’s announcement complements Coalition commitments to address the regulatory barriers to new gas supply, unlock key gas basins, and to reinstate annual acreage releases.  

    “Australia needs energy policies that provide certainty around project approvals and regulatory stability to restore investor confidence,” she said. 

    “The deliberate exclusion of gas from the current CIS was a mistake that needs correcting to incentivise the significant investment needed to ensure Australians have reliable and affordable energy. 

    “This is not a measure that needs to wait until the next federal election – it is a conversation that state and federal energy ministers should be having today.” 

     

    Media Contact: Brad Thompson on 0401 839 227 

    MIL OSI Economics –

    January 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Australia: Interview with Ros Childs, ABC News

    Source: Australian Treasurer

    ROS CHILDS:

    Let’s stay with the government’s proposal to ban debit card surcharges from 2026. The Assistant federal Treasurer, Stephen Jones, joins us now. Stephen Jones, welcome.

    STEPHEN JONES:

    Good to be with you.

    CHILDS:

    So, how much do surcharges cost consumers and small businesses right now?

    JONES:

    Look, the charging arrangements are incredibly opaque, but our estimates are anywhere between $1.5 and $4 billion a year is being taken out of the system by a combination of the banks, the card system providers, and the payment rail providers. The end result is that consumers are paying to access their own money, and they’re saying, quite rightly, it’s harder to get cash, fewer places are accepting it, we’re being forced into electronic payment systems and we’re being forced to pay surcharges to access our own money.

    CHILDS:

    So, the banks, though, say that fees and charges have been reducing every year for the past decade. That there is an option for businesses to use what’s called Least Cost Routing so payment terminals automatically default to the cheapest surcharge. What’s your response to that argument?

    JONES:

    What we want to see is that customers aren’t paying to access their own money to buy a cup of coffee or to fill their shopping trolley, and that’s what’s happening at the moment. We want to ensure that at least, at the very least, on these debit charges, this surcharging is knocked on the head.

    What’s occurred over the last year or so is we’ve seen a whole heap of changes going on in the way these charges are imposed upon the small businesses. Big differentials between what a big retailer like a Coles and Woolies is paying, compared to a small business when it comes to these surcharges – the payments they’re making to their banks. Not a lot of clarity about what’s being paid, where and by whom, except when it comes to the consumer. So, we’ve got the Reserve Bank spending the next few months having a look at it – a detailed analysis of the cost of providing these services and the charges that are being charged by all the participants in the system – there’s at least 3 or 4 different participants in the system – as a precursor to us getting some clear guidelines, making it very, very clear to industry that we will introduce a ban by the beginning of 2026 on debit charges, on debit card surcharges.

    They don’t have to wait till then. They can move ahead of that. But we want to ensure that we do it in a way that doesn’t look like a benefit to consumers, but it ends up being the small businesses who cop it in the neck—they’re prevented from covering the costs of a surcharge by recouping it from a consumer, but they’re still getting the banks and the payment system providers charging these exorbitant costs. That’s why we need to take a little bit of time to get it right, but sending a very clear message to all the participants, this has got to stop.

    CHILDS:

    Ok, so you say you’re sending a signal, a message with this proposal, but how hopeful, realistically, are you that the banks will move on this without you having to take action, even though in the past they have proved very resistant, haven’t they, to making changes that will hit their bottom line?

    JONES:

    What I can say I’m certain about is that if the banks, the payment system providers, the card operators don’t get it right and don’t knock this on the head themselves, then we are willing to move ourselves and using the levers available to us to ensure that these debit card surcharges are ended.

    CHILDS:

    So, we heard a couple of political voices there, the Greens Senator, Sarah Hanson‑Young, and the Opposition Leader, Peter Dutton, both saying that the cost‑of‑living crisis means that consumers can’t wait until 2026, the start date for the proposed ban, they need the surcharge ban now. Also, Sarah Hanson‑Young calling for the ban to be extended to credit card surcharges, as well as to debit cards. How would you answer that?

    JONES:

    To Peter Dutton – 9 years, nothing? Not a single thing on this problem? It was a problem on his watch. He’s done nothing on it. In the first 2 years of our government, we’ve moved across a whole range of areas of consumer policy, lifting protections on consumers. We’re determined to do it. So, the bloke who has done nothing for 9 years, now thinks there’s an urgent problem to be fixed, doesn’t have a lot of credibility, particularly when he’s voted against every single piece of cost‑of‑living relief that this government has introduced. Peter Dutton is batting on zero when it comes to helping consumers. And, for the Greens, frankly, their form on this is whatever Labor does and then another 10 per cent. So, frankly, this is just situation normal from the Greens. We’re taking a considered approach. We’ll get a benefit to consumers, but without making small businesses pay for it. We’ll do it in the right way. Very clear message to industry: they’ve got to get their act into order.

    CHILDS:

    Assistant Treasurer Stephen Jones. Thank you.

    MIL OSI News –

    January 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: Speech by SFST at HKEX FIC Summit APAC 2024 (English only) (with photo)

    Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

    Speech by SFST at HKEX FIC Summit APAC 2024 (English only) (with photo)
    Speech by SFST at HKEX FIC Summit APAC 2024 (English only) (with photo)
    ***********************************************************************

         Following is the speech by the Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury, Mr Christopher Hui, at the HKEX FIC Summit APAC 2024 today (October 15): Bonnie (Chief Executive Officer of Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited, Ms Bonnie Chan), distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen,      It is both an honour and a privilege to stand before you today at the HKEX FIC Summit APAC 2024. We gather to explore the rich landscape of fixed income and currency markets, particularly as they pertain to the burgeoning opportunities in Mainland China. This year’s summit comes at a pivotal moment for not only Hong Kong but also for the broader Asia-Pacific region as we navigate the complexities of a rapidly evolving financial world.      As we delve into the exciting topics surrounding Chinese government bonds, Renminbi (RMB) internationalisation, and the innovative Swap Connect initiative, we recognise that Hong Kong is uniquely positioned at the intersection of global finance and the vast opportunities that lie within Mainland China’s fixed income space. Hong Kong as an international financial centre      Hong Kong has long been heralded as a beacon of international finance, a vibrant hub characterised by its openness, robust regulatory framework, and professional expertise. Our market is not just a financial centre; it is a dynamic environment where diverse talents converge, facilitating the free flow of information and capital. This unique position allows us to leverage the advantages of both worlds – global access coupled with deep insights into the Mainland’s economic landscape.      As the world’s second-largest economy, Mainland China is increasingly integrated with the international financial world, and we are thrilled to be part of this journey. The rise of the RMB as a significant player in international trade, investment, and cross-border transactions is not just a trend; it is a transformation that presents us with incredible opportunities. The rise of the Renminbi      The growth trajectory of the RMB is remarkable. According to various reports, the proportion of RMB used in global transactions has been steadily increasing. RMB is the fourth most active currency for global payments by value as of August this year, with its share rising to 4.7 per cent, according to SWIFT data. This is not merely a consequence of Mainland China’s economic growth; it reflects a strategic rise of the RMB as a global currency.      Here in Hong Kong, we have been at the forefront of this initiative since 2004, establishing ourselves as the world’s leading offshore RMB business hub. The developments we have witnessed – such as the largest offshore pool of RMB funds and a vibrant market for foreign exchange and interest rate derivatives – highlight our commitment to creating a diversified ecosystem that enhances the RMB’s global standing.      The opportunities for businesses and investors are vast. As we facilitate the growth of the RMB, we also open doors for international investors looking to capitalise on the Mainland’s economic potential. Our position as a financial conduit for RMB transactions allows us to attract global capital, creating a win-win scenario that benefits all parties involved. Advancing the FIC market development      As we strive to strengthen our position as a leading international financial centre, we are dedicated to enhancing our fixed income and currency (FIC) markets. Our vision is to transform Hong Kong into a premier FIC hub in the Asia-Pacific region, a goal that aligns with our broader market development objectives.      The local bond market is a vital component of this strategy. We are committed to developing it further to complement the financing functions of the stock market and banking system. According market statistics, Hong Kong ranked the first in the region for 16 consecutive years in terms of arranging international bond issuance by Asian institutions, and has ranked first in the world for nine of those years. The amount of issuance arranged through Hong Kong last year was close to US$90 billion, which accounted for nearly a quarter of the market.      Our dedication to strengthening the local bond market is evident on many fronts. Earlier this year, we successfully offered approximately HK$25 billion worth of green bonds denominated in RMB, USD and EURO. Impressive response was received from global investors with the subscription amount exceeding HK$120 billion equivalent, which was about four times of oversubscription. In particular, the 20-year and 30-year RMB Green Bonds were offered for the first time by the Government, among which the 30-year bond is also the longest tenor RMB bond offered by the Government so far, providing new benchmarks for the market. We have seen significant progress, particularly with the issuance of RMB sovereign bonds and municipal government bonds in Hong Kong. These bonds not only enhance our local bond market but also help establish a benchmark yield curve for offshore RMB bonds. So far, the Ministry of Finance has issued a total of RMB352 billion RMB sovereign bonds in Hong Kong. Furthermore, recent tax exemptions for debt instruments issued by Mainland local governments underscore our commitment to fostering a robust bond market. This exemption, effective from March last year, extends the profits tax exemption to debt instruments issued in Hong Kong by all Mainland local governments, thus encouraging more participation and investment. The impact of Bond Connect      We must also acknowledge the transformative impact of the Bond Connect scheme. Launched in 2017, Bond Connect has facilitated mutual access between Hong Kong and Mainland bond markets, enabling overseas investors to participate in the China Interbank Bond Market. This scheme has fundamentally changed the landscape of bond investment in the region. As of August this year, foreign holdings of Mainland onshore bonds through Bond Connect have exceeded RMB4,500 billion, illustrating the strong demand for Chinese assets. The total monthly trading volume has also increased from RMB31.0 billion in July 2017 to about RMB1,000 billion in August this year.      The launch of Southbound trading in September 2021 has further enriched this initiative, providing an effective avenue for qualified onshore investors to diversify their asset allocation while presenting enormous opportunities for Hong Kong’s financial industry. Not only does this enhance the attractiveness of Hong Kong as a bond-issuing platform, but it also promotes the liquidity of our bond market and facilitates the progress of RMB internationalisation.      The interconnectedness fostered by Bond Connect not only enriches our markets but also serves as a catalyst for RMB internationalisation. As we continue to enhance this framework, we create new opportunities for collaboration and investment that will benefit both local and international stakeholders. Innovations with Swap Connect      The introduction of Swap Connect is another significant milestone in our journey toward enhancing Hong Kong’s offshore RMB market. Launched in May 2023, Swap Connect allows for mutual access between interest rate swap markets in Hong Kong and the Mainland. This initiative provides a much-needed avenue for global investors to manage interest rate risks associated with their bond investments.      As we celebrate the first anniversary of Swap Connect, we are excited about the recent enhancements that have been launched. The enhancements expand the range of products available, enhance operational efficiency, and reduce participation costs. It has also been announced that offshore investors will be able to use onshore bonds issued by the Ministry of Finance and policy banks on the Mainland as margin collateral for transactions. This measure will improve capital efficiency and also stimulate greater market participation.      We are committed to ensuring that Swap Connect remains a robust and dynamic platform for investors. We believe that by addressing the diverse risk management needs of domestic and foreign investors, we can further invigorate market participation in the Connect Schemes. Future opportunities      Looking ahead, there are abundant opportunities on the horizon. As we embrace the development of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area, we find ourselves in a unique position to facilitate RMB internationalisation and strengthen our role as a testing ground for innovative financial practices. This initiative is not only vital for economic growth but also positions us as a leader in the global financial arena.      Moreover, we will continue to leverage technological advancements to enhance our financial services. The integration of fintech solutions into our FIC markets will not only improve efficiency but also attract a new generation of investors who are looking for innovative ways to engage with the market. Building on the success of the first tokenised green bond issuance, we have issued the world’s first multi-tranche digitally native green bonds this year, denominated in HKD, CNH, USD and EUR. By embracing technology, we can enhance transparency, streamline operations, and create a more inclusive financial environment. Conclusion      As we continue to leverage our distinctive advantages, I am confident that we will solidify Hong Kong’s status as a leading international financial centre and offshore RMB business hub. Together, let us explore the pathways to greater collaboration, innovation, and growth. I look forward to fruitful discussions and collaborations in the days to come. Your participation and insights are invaluable as we chart a course toward a prosperous financial future for Hong Kong, China, and the Asia-Pacific region. Thank you. 

     
    Ends/Tuesday, October 15, 2024Issued at HKT 11:57

    NNNN

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News –

    January 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: “Advancing New Zealand and Asia relations”

    Source: New Zealand Government

    Good evening

    Before discussing the ‘advancing of New Zealand and Asia relations’, we would like to congratulate the Asia New Zealand Foundation and acknowledge its significant contribution to New Zealand’s relationship with, and understanding of, Asia over the past 30 years.

    Can we also welcome Thitinan Pongsudhirak, one of the Foundation’s Honorary Advisers, and Michael Fullilove, Executive Director of the Lowy Institute.  

    I would also like to acknowledge Members of Parliament; members of the diplomatic corps; Asia New Zealand Foundation founders Sir Don McKinnon and Philip Burdon; and its Chair, Dame Fran Wilde.

    A lot has happened over the past 30 years – in New Zealand, in Asia, and indeed in New Zealand’s engagement with Asia.

    30 years ago

    It is, of course, difficult to talk about Asia in general terms. The region has 23 countries, hundreds of languages and a vast swathe of peoples and cultures and political systems. 

    This is to say nothing of the vast distances in Asia.  Indeed, it’s closer from London to Moscow than Auckland to Jakarta, and yet we tend to think Indonesia as our back yard. 

    We tend to zone in on one country, or one issue.

    Our understanding needs to be more nuanced than this – something the Asia New Zealand Foundation knows well and is in fact its core mission.

    We can, however, look at some trends, as we think about New Zealand’s relationship with Asia over the past 30 years.

    In 1994, for example, Asia’s population was over three billion people. The region accounted for one quarter of the world’s GDP, and economic growth was underway in many countries. 

    The region had experienced years of peace and stability, albeit with some notable exceptions. Many parts of the region were at the start of a long, although sometimes uneven, path of rising urbanisation, productivity and incomes.

    In New Zealand, our population had just tipped over three million. Asian countries had become important trading partners – this was 20 years after Britain joined the European Economic Community and forced us to look beyond our traditional trading partners. 

    We had adapted by looking closer to home. 

    Thirty five percent of New Zealand’s exports went to Asia, with Japan accounting for close to half of this. 

    Remarkably, at that time China took just two percent of our exports, compared to 20 percent of today.

    Many New Zealanders had come to realise the importance of Asia to our future prosperity.

    Along with this came a recognition that we needed to better understand the vast range of cultures, languages and peoples of the region. This would be a shift for us. 

    Just three percent of New Zealanders at the time identified as being of Asian origin – compared to 17 percent today. 

    We had the beginnings of some cultural and culinary influences, with tourists and students starting to flow. 

    Under the Colombo Plan, we had welcomed many Asian students to New Zealand. But for the most part, these cultural influences were not mainstream or well-understood at the time.

    It was in this context that the Asia New Zealand Foundation was born and began its important work that we are here to discuss today.

    What has changed in Asia? 

    Even those who were aficionados back in 1994 might have been surprised at just how important Asia would become to New Zealand.

    The Asian financial crisis in 1997 was devastating to the region. It was an unsettled and unpredictable time. But the region has recovered, and in fact boomed.

    The figures are certainly impressive. More than one billion people have been lifted out of poverty in Asia since 1990. Asia now comprises over 40 percent of the world’s GDP. In the next quarter century, this is forecast to reach 50 percent. 

    It is important for us all to remember that there has not been just one linear trajectory in the region. Each country has had its own path, and these paths can have different twists and turns over time.

    China’s growth story is of course well-known, but the statistics remain extraordinary. Today, China stands as the world’s second-largest economy worth nearly 18 trillion US dollars in 2023, soaring a staggering 4,000 percent since the 1990s.

    This is not, however, just a China story. There has been astonishing success in other countries, too. 

    India overtook China to become the most populous country in the world last year, and with 900 million registered voters it is also the world’s largest democracy. This year India’s economy will be the fastest growing in the G20, and it is expected to overtake Germany and Japan to become the world’s third largest economy in the next few years. 

    India’s advances in science, technology, education, and space, are inspiring to many countries around the world. In short, India has become a significant global actor playing a key role in securing a stable and prosperous region.

    Japan itself continues to be an economic powerhouse.

    We must also recognise that ASEAN’s growth, after starting down the path of economic integration, has been remarkable. 

    If ASEAN today were one economy, it would be New Zealand’s fourth-largest trading partner. Its countries are growing at an impressive clip – more than five percent year in, year out. 

    The total GDP of ASEAN reached nearly four trillion US dollars last years, positioning it as the fifth largest economy in the world. 

    Projections indicate that ASEAN’s GDP is poised to reach an estimated four and a half trillion US dollars by the year 2030. This will propel ASEAN to become the world’s fourth-largest economy by 2040.

    Much of Asia’s economic growth has been built on trade and manufacturing. But the region is now also central across many facets of the modern economy – from finance and capital, to people, and to innovation.

    To take just two examples, Asia’s services trade is growing 1.7 times faster than the rest of the world. And by 2030, Asia’s fintech revenues are expected to be larger even than North America’s.

    We know economic growth doesn’t happen in a vacuum. It is regional security that has provided the foundation for the significant rise in living standards we have witnessed across Asia. 

    In this time of global upheaval and challenges to the rules-based order, the role of regional security in our collective economic security is undeniable. 

    In Southeast Asia, ASEAN centrality is playing a pivotal role. ASEAN has led the way in bringing the region together in peaceful dialogue. This includes initiatives like the Regional Forum we attended in July, or last week’s East Asia Summit – which was attended by Prime Minister Luxon.

    Notwithstanding the various peaceful offramps that exist, Asia has had, and continues to have, security challenges. 

    The liberal rules-based order – underpinned by US hegemony – is under strain.

    As China’s power and influence have increased, so too have the areas of difference that we have had to navigate.

    We are seeing a rising and more active India.

    And we shouldn’t forget that Russia considers itself an Indo-Pacific power, too.

    Added to this are hemispheric wild cards: the DPRK; other nuclear powers; arms build-up; and alliance and proxy relationships.

    We also have population trends that will have not just economic but also geostrategic consequences. 

    Also, fierce competition for resources: protein and commodities like rare metals.

    Finally – environmental challenges, which are an existential threat for many countries in the region – are exacerbating all of these factors. 

    What has this meant for New Zealand? 

    For New Zealand, the message is clear: we need to continue to understand and engage Asia.

    The Coalition Government, via the Foreign Policy Reset, is focused on building and advancing relationships in a way that engages more actively the region’s opportunities and risks. 

    The work of the Asia New Zealand Foundation remains as relevant today as it was 30 years ago. 

    Understanding Asia starts here at home. The past 30 years has seen a boom, and our ethnic communities have grown significantly. 

    While there is still some way to go, we have started to see Asian New Zealanders in leadership roles – from Members of Parliament to business leaders, sports, and entertainment. 

    Along with this has come a richness of culture and language. Kiwis have enjoyed new festivities and embraced an array of Asian cuisine, at home and at restaurants – something almost completely unavailable 30 years ago.

    The top 25 languages spoken in New Zealand include many Asian languages, such as Mandarin, with nearly 100,000 speakers, as well as Hindi with almost 70,000, Cantonese, Tagalog, Punjabi, Korean, Japanese, Gujarati, and Tamil.

    We celebrate Diwali, Lunar New Year and Eid – festivals that showcase cultural traditions to New Zealanders.

    Last year, 54,000 students from Asian countries came to study in New Zealand education institutions. 

    In the last year we have welcomed over 700,000 international visitors from Asia – nearly double that of a year ago – and we’re looking forward to seeing this growth continue over the coming years as the pandemic fall-out recedes.

    Over the last 70 years, we have provided scholarships and training to 21 countries from the Asian region under our International Development Cooperation programme. This remains a foundation of our enduring people-to-people connections.

    Thanks to the Asia New Zealand Foundation, we have some tangible evidence of how New Zealanders’ attitudes toward Asia have changed over time. 

    The first Perceptions of Asia survey was conducted in 1997 and showed that New Zealanders saw Asia as something largely external. 

    Today, however, over half of New Zealanders feel a connection to Asia in their daily lives, with more than a third regularly enjoying Asia-related entertainment. 

    Over the past decade, public awareness and engagement with Asia has grown significantly. In 2013, one third of New Zealanders said they felt knowledgeable about Asia. 

    That number has now risen to an all-time high, with nearly 60 percent saying they possess at least a fair amount of understanding about the region.

    This is wonderful and thanks in no small part to the work of the Foundation. We hope we will see this familiarity grow further in the coming years.

    New Zealand in Asia

    Alongside these developments in New Zealand, we have been engaging both with Asia but also in Asia.

    Today you can fly direct from Auckland and Christchurch to 14 destinations across Asia, connecting New Zealand to the region and providing opportunities for New Zealanders to interact with and learn about Asia.

     

    Kiwis have been broadening their traditional “OE” and heading to Asia. As just one example, 3,300 New Zealanders have travelled to Japan under the Japan Exchange and Teaching, or “JET”, programme since its inception, teaching English in Japan. 

    Programmes such as the Prime Minister’s Scholarships for Asia have seen thousands of young New Zealanders study at Asian institutions and return with meaningful skills and experience. 

    The Asia New Zealand Foundation has also contributed to this through the internships, grants, and residencies it offers throughout Asia.

    It is important to highlight that seven of our top 10 export destinations are Asian economies. 

    Exports to China amounted to 20 billion New Zealand dollars last year; Japan more than four billion. Korea, Singapore, Taiwan, Malaysia, and Indonesia round out the list of our top export destinations in Asia.

    This has been supported by the network of free trade agreements we have negotiated to support our commercial partnerships over the past 20 years. It is notable that our second oldest FTA is with Singapore – second only to Australia. 

    The origins of CPTPP, one of our most significant trade agreements, also finds its origins in our relationships with Asia. 

    Its precursor, the P4 agreement with Singapore, Brunei, and Chile in 2006, provided the foundation stone for what would become CPTPP.

    CPTPP is itself a high watermark agreement that includes other economies from the region such as Japan, Malaysia, and Viet Nam, and we continue to encourage others who can meet the agreement’s high standards to seek to join in the future.

    All in all, 95 percent of our trade with Asia takes place under a trade agreement.

    New Zealand has also invested in regional institutions. This architecture provides space for dialogue and the exchange of ideas on key issues impacting us. 

    We were the second country to become an ASEAN dialogue partner, and we will celebrate the 50th anniversary of this next year. In that time New Zealand has been and continues to be a trusted partner to ASEAN and its member states. 

    We know that by contributing to ASEAN’s success, and the success of ASEAN-led councils like the East Asia Summit, we contribute to our own success and to that of the region.

    In 1994, New Zealand was a member of one regional body – APEC, which was founded just five years earlier. 

    This platform gives us a venue to influence regional economic policy together with members, who today make up two thirds of global economic growth and take 80 percent of New Zealand’s exports.

    Just over 10 years later, in 2005, our delegation was proud to take part in the inaugural East Asia Summit in Kuala Lumpur. 

    We had put intensive effort into laying the groundwork for the shape of the grouping and New Zealand’s participation. 

    Our membership as a founding partner made clear to all that New Zealand was part of the region and had a role to play in regional decisions. 

    The EAS is now the premier forum for strategic dialogue and regional cooperation. 

    New Zealand is showing up today, as we did then, because we want to support peace and stability in the region in tangible ways.

    Recent years have seen the emergence of new plurilateral and ‘minilateral’ architecture alongside established multilateral architecture. 

    New Zealand supports new groupings that advance and defend our interests and capabilities, and we no reason why these can’t coexist as long as they are constructive, advanced in an open and transparent way, and are respectful of ASEAN centrality.

    We have championed a stable, peaceful and nuclear-free Korean Peninsula. In the current climate, it is not possible to visit North Korea. But in the past, we have. 

    During a 2007 visit, we met with political leaders and advocated in favour of multi-party peace talks. 

    To this day, New Zealand Defence Force assets and personnel are deployed in Korea to maintain the armistice. The Defence Force also has a separate deployment to monitor and deter North Korea’s evasion of UN sanctions.

    In 2006, we received a request from Timor-Leste, seeking assistance to restore stability and freedom of movement. We responded swiftly, deploying police and military troops. 

    In a testament to our security cooperation in the region, Singaporean personnel were integrated seamlessly into a New Zealand battalion.

    New Zealand has a long-standing development programme in Asia. It is our largest programme outside the Pacific and is growing. 

    It goes beyond training and scholarships to respond to the priorities of our ASEAN partners, as well as humanitarian assistance. 

    Just last month, for example, we contributed humanitarian assistance in response to the devastating impacts of Typhoon Yagi in Viet Nam and Myanmar, and to extreme flooding in Bangladesh. 

    It is also worth noting that, for the past 30 years, New Zealand has advanced its policy towards Asia in a bipartisan way wherever possible. 

    This has ensured successive governments can follow through on policy commitments and is one of our greatest strengths.

    What next? 

    It is instructive to think about how far we have come in the past 30 years

    But it is also clear that we need to do more. 

    The world today is disordered and becoming more dangerous. 

    As we said to the NZIIA in May, “the challenges we face are stark, the worst that anyone today working in politics or foreign affairs can remember.” 

    As MFAT’s own strategic assessment has identified, one of the drivers for this has been a shift from rules to power:  the Cold War era of predominant US western hegemony is over. 

    The multipolar world is here to stay, and states: large, middle, and small are all jostling to advance their interests.

    Added to this is the fact that global problems – whether health, environmental, demographic, or migratory – present global risks, but at the same time require state-to-state cooperation to resolve. 

    We offer this simply to point out that we’re living in a time where relationships, norms and rules – many of which have enabled the rise of countries in Asia, including those which seek to challenge those same rules – are changing at the very time when we need to maximise global cooperation.

    This is at the heart of what’s happening in Asia, as well as around the world more broadly. 

    This is why the Government decided earlier this year on a Foreign Policy Reset. A fundamental driver was that our foreign policy needs to reflect and respond to the challenging strategic context we find ourselves in. We need to act now to bring more energy, ambition and engagement to our relationships. 

    Under the Foreign Policy Reset, we have been explicit: we will be increasing the focus on and resources applied to Southeast Asia, South Asia especially India, and North Asia. This is what will have a major impact on our security and prosperity. 

    We are already delivering on this. The Prime Minister and international-facing Ministers have been incredibly active in our engagements with the region, having travelled between us to over 20 countries.

    We have taken forward concrete initiatives to demonstrate the importance and future trajectory of our partnerships. 

    This ranges from cooperation with Japan on a hospital in Kiribati, to a Customs Cooperation Arrangement with India, to advancing toward Comprehensive Strategic Partnerships with ASEAN and Korea.

    Conclusion 

    New Zealand is an Indo-Pacific country. This is our identity, and we know this is where our future lies. With every forecast about Asia’s trajectory, this becomes clearer and clearer.

    It was this realisation that led to the Asia New Zealand Foundation’s birth 30 years ago. And as we have heard today, a lot has changed since then. Asia has evolved, and New Zealand’s relationship with Asian countries has evolved too, in some ways beyond recognition. 

    As we navigate our own pathway forward, we need to understand Asia. If we don’t, our relationships will be characterised by misconceptions, bias and miscalculation. So, our work has really only just begun. New Zealand’s security and prosperity depends on us continuing it.

    MIL OSI New Zealand News –

    January 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI China: Policies to support smaller enterprises

    Source: China State Council Information Office

    Employees work on the production line of a high-tech company in Tianjin. [Photo/Xinhua]

    China will implement a batch of policies, including those addressing financing and credit, to support small and micro-sized enterprises, platform firms and unicorns, so as to help them expand business and unleash vitality, it was announced on Monday at a conference by the State Council, the nation’s Cabinet.

    Buoyed by such signals of support for the private sector, share prices rose in China on Monday. The CSI 300, an index of large companies traded in Shanghai and Shenzhen, closed 1.9 percent higher. The ChiNext Index, which tracks China’s Nasdaq-style board of growing and emerging enterprises, gained 2.6 percent.

    Luo Wen, head of the State Administration for Market Regulation, the country’s top market regulator, said that the country will work to introduce innovative quality financing and credit enhancement policies to ease financing challenges for SMSEs.

    Under such policies, financial institutions will factor in a company’s quality management and brand reputation when issuing loans. Together with equity, funds and bond-based financing tools, the country aims to generate a credit enhancement and financing quota of 300 billion yuan ($42 billion) each year, Luo said.

    Luo emphasized that the SAMR will roll out a guideline to guide platform operators to help merchants on the platform enhance brand awareness, increase market transactions and harness traffic.

    It will help businesses, especially new entrants, agricultural firms and some unique companies on the platform, to enhance their ability to utilize online traffic more efficiently and tap into larger audiences, he added.

    Beyond SMSE support, Wang Jiangping, vice-minister of the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, said the ministry will collaborate with the China Securities Regulatory Commission to launch the third batch of specialized boards for “little giant” companies in regional equity markets.

    Little giant companies refer to small and medium-sized enterprises that typically specialize in niche sectors, command high market shares and boast strong innovative capacity. By the end of June this year, China had cultivated 12,000 such enterprises.

    The ministry also plans to sign a strategic cooperation agreement with the Beijing Stock Exchange to further streamline financing channels for these firms, Wang said.

    At the conference on Monday, Wang said that China is also placing a greater emphasis on developing unicorn companies — startups valued at over $1 billion — in emerging high-tech fields such as 6G and brain-computer interfaces.

    He said a nationwide unified system will be established to coordinate the development of unicorn companies between the central government and provincial government levels.

    Unicorn companies will be supported in technological innovation, and will be encouraged and guided to address national strategic needs and master unique, proprietary technologies, Wang said, adding that more efforts will be made to increase financial backing for these unicorns, including support for public listings, mergers and acquisitions, to accelerate their growth.

    Despite China’s growing unicorns, the country still lags behind the United States in terms of the overall number, according to the Hurun Research Institute. Last year, China had 340 unicorns while the US had 700.

    Wang Peng, a senior researcher at the Beijing Academy of Social Sciences, said that encouraging SMSEs, platform firms and unicorn companies are part of broader efforts to spur the private sector, which is of great significance to counter the current global economic slowdown.

    A report on private sector development by the State Council showed that private companies accounted for 92.3 percent of the country’s total number of business entities in 2023, a significant increase from 79.4 percent in 2012.

    “The Chinese economy will continue gathering momentum if the private sector, including smaller businesses, remains sound. More importantly, private enterprises stood undoubtedly at the forefront of technological innovations and the digital economy in recent years, especially in fields like new energy, information, communication, biopharmaceuticals and AI,” the senior researcher said.

    MIL OSI China News –

    January 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Thousands of new homes to be built as government unlocks brownfield sites

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Thousands of new homes to be built as part of the government’s plans to get the country building again.

    Thousands of new homes to be built as part of the government’s plans to get the country building again, create jobs and grow the economy as a multi-million-pound funding boost is given councils to unlock disused brownfield sites.

    £68 million, announced today by the Prime Minister, will go directly to 54 councils who will be able to use the money to turn neglected land into new homes. It will transform local communities and help families onto the property ladder.

    The funding will mean councils can clear empty buildings, former car parks and industrial land to make way for the homes. This category of land is expensive to prepare for housebuilding, meaning sites are sat empty and an eyesore for local communities.

    With the funding, delivered through the Brownfield Land Release Fund, councils will be able to cover the cost of decontamination, clearing disused buildings or improving infrastructure such as internet, water and power. As a result, land will be released to enable 5,200 homes to be built across the country.

    Prime Minister Keir Starmer said:

    From the outset we promised to get this country building again to deliver 1.5 million homes over this parliament and help tackle the housing crisis we have inherited. That is the essence of fixing the foundations and driving growth.

    I said this government is on the side of the builders, not the blockers. And I meant it. This funding for councils will see disused sites and industrial wastelands transformed into thousands of new homes in places that people want to live and work. Our brownfield-first approach will not only ramp up housebuilding but also create more jobs, deliver much-needed infrastructure, and boost economic growth across the country.

    This government is rolling up its sleeves and delivering the change the British people deserve.

    Housing and Planning Minister Matthew Pennycook said:  

    The government is committed to a brownfield-first approach to housebuilding, and we have already taken steps to prioritise and fast-track building on previously used urban land through our proposals for a ‘brownfield passport’.

    The funding announced today will support the delivery of thousands of new homes and boost economic growth by unlocking development on scores of abandoned, disused and neglected urban sites across the country.

    Some of the projects to benefit from the funding include:

    • £2.9 million to Manchester to unlock a vacant brownfield site to build 220 much-needed affordable homes
    • £2.2 million to Eastbourne to transform a former industrial site, to build 100 new homes including 80 affordable houses
    • Over £1.7 million to the town centre in Weston-Super-Mare to allow over 100 homes to be built on brownfield land
    • £1.4 million to Northampton to transform a former bus depot and deliver 72 new homes

    It has also been announced today that Homes England will be investing £30 million to help accelerate the transformation of the Riverside Sunderland area from a former industrial heartland into a thriving new place. The Brownfield Infrastructure Land (BIL) investment will support a broader project aiming to create around 1,000 new homes, new community infrastructure and one million square feet of tailored office space for UK and international businesses, providing accommodation for between 8,000 and 10,000 jobs.

    To accelerate housing development and achieve the ambition to build 1.5 million homes, the government has also:

    • Announced an overhaul of the planning system through a consultation on reforms to the National Planning Policy Framework, including new mandatory housebuilding targets for councils.
    • Launched a New Homes Accelerator group to unblock thousands of new homes stuck in the planning system or partially built.
    • Introduced ‘brownfield passports’ to ensure where planning proposals meet design and quality standards, the default answer to planning permission is yes.
    • Set up an independent New Towns Taskforce, as part of a long-term vision to create largescale communities of at least 10,000 new homes each.

    It comes as earlier today it was announced that tens of thousands of new homes will be built across Britain funded by over £550 million worth of impact investments. These investments, whereby a fund creates beneficial social or environmental impact, has now grown to £76.8 billion in the UK in assets under management. This shows the government’s hard work is already restoring confidence for investors to choose Britain, which is open for business.

    ENDS

    Notes to editors

    The three-year £180 million Brownfield Land Release Fund 2 was launched in July 2022 to allow local authorities in England to be able to build on blocked brownfield land.

    Cllr Louise Gittins, Chair of the Local Government Association, said: “We are delighted to continue our work with MHCLG, supporting councils to access the Brownfield Land Release Fund to remediate unviable council-owned brownfield land and bring it forwards for much needed homes. Delivered through the One Public Estate programme, BLRF is an important fund for English councils to unlock smaller sites and provides the flexibility for councils to deliver the types of homes their community needs at pace.”

    Share this page

    The following links open in a new tab

    • Share on Facebook (opens in new tab)
    • Share on Twitter (opens in new tab)

    Updates to this page

    Published 15 October 2024

    MIL OSI United Kingdom –

    January 23, 2025
  • MIL-Evening Report: Queensland Premier Steven Miles is promising to hold a vote on nuclear power. Here’s why

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Anne Twomey, Professor Emerita in Constitutional Law, University of Sydney

    Tarong power station Stanwell

    Queensland Premier Steven Miles this week declared his party would hold a plebiscite on nuclear power if it returns to office at the forthcoming state election.

    The move is in response to plans by the federal Coalition to build and operate seven nuclear plants around Australia if elected to government. Opposition Leader Peter Dutton says the facilities would be built at sites of coal power stations scheduled for closure. Two are slated for Queensland, at the Callide and Tarong power stations.

    Queensland has state laws banning the construction or operation of a nuclear facility and requiring the state government to hold a plebiscite if there are Commonwealth plans to build a nuclear plant in the state. A plebiscite is a referendum-style vote to gauge voters’ views on an issue.

    Unlike a referendum, the results are not binding. There’s also very little chance a plebiscite could be held on or before the date of the next federal election, as Miles has suggested, as the laws do not allow for a plebiscite on an opposition policy.

    Who has the constitutional power over nuclear facilities?

    While the Commonwealth Constitution does not refer to nuclear energy, the federal parliament has passed laws to regulate nuclear matters. To do so, it relies on a web of constitutional powers, including the trade and commerce power, the corporations power, the external affairs power and the territories power.

    The Commonwealth can also compulsorily acquire land for public purposes. This makes the land a “Commonwealth place” over which it can exercise full and exclusive legislative power.

    The federal government has previously engaged in commercial matters by establishing trading corporations, such as NBN Co and Snowy Hydro Ltd, to deal with nation-building infrastructure.

    It seems likely, therefore, that the federal parliament could pass laws to authorise and regulate the operation of nuclear power plants in Australia.

    In doing so, its laws would override inconsistent state laws, such as those that prohibit nuclear facilities, under section 109 of the Constitution.

    But state governments could still make it difficult for the Commonwealth to give effect to its nuclear policies. You only have to look at how state governments have successfully opposed Commonwealth efforts to create a nuclear waste facility to see the problems.

    Plebiscite as booby trap

    The development of a nuclear power industry in Australia has been debated before – most recently in 2006 when the Howard Coalition government commissioned the Switkowski report on the use of nuclear energy in Australia.

    This report suggested the Commonwealth could act to establish 25 nuclear power stations across Australia. In response, Queensland’s parliament, under a Labor government, enacted the Nuclear Facilities Prohibition Act 2007. It banned the construction or operation of certain types of nuclear facilities in Queensland. New South Wales and Victoria had also previously done the same.

    The Queensland government recognised the Commonwealth probably had the power to override such a ban. So it included a political booby trap in section 21 of the law.

    It says that if the relevant Queensland minister is satisfied the Commonwealth government has taken, or is likely to take, any step supporting or allowing the construction of a prohibited nuclear facility in Queensland, the minister:

    must take steps for the conduct of a plebiscite in Queensland to obtain the views of the people of Queensland about the construction of a prohibited nuclear facility in Queensland.

    Unlike a referendum, which changes the Constitution, a plebiscite operates as an opinion poll.

    It would not prevent a nuclear power plant being built, or stop the federal parliament overriding the state ban. But it could create a political impediment.

    During the debate over the state law in 2007, then-Premier Peter Beattie made this point clearly:

    If the Howard government wants to use its powers to override the strong position of Queenslanders […] this government will make certain that Queenslanders have a chance to have their say.

    This was important, he claimed, because it would “put political pressure on the federal government to not go down this road”. In other words, the law can be used to apply political pressure.

    Of plebiscites and federal elections

    Miles suggested the plebiscite could be held the same day as the next federal election “to save people going to the polls twice”.

    This could affect voting in the federal election by highlighting the impact of nuclear policies on Queensland. But if this is the tactic, Miles faces two problems.

    First, Queensland law only triggers the plebiscite requirement when the relevant state minister is “satisfied the government of the Commonwealth” is likely to take a step in supporting or allowing the construction of a prohibited nuclear facility in Queensland.

    But the minister could not legally be satisfied of this before the election outcome is known, as a policy of an opposition party does not amount to a proposed action of the “government of the Commonwealth”.

    Second, section 394 of the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 says no state or territory election, referendum or vote can be held on the day of a Commonwealth election without the authority of the governor-general.

    This ban was introduced in 1922, after holding state votes at the same time as federal elections resulted in a high informal vote due to different voting instructions.

    The governor-general has given this permission only once, when the Northern Territory held a plebiscite on becoming a state on the same day as the 1998 federal election.

    It’s doubtful the federal government would advise the governor-general to permit a partisan state plebiscite to be held on the same day as a federal election.

    Queensland’s ageing Callide Power Station opened nearly 60 years ago. It’s been flagged as a possible location for a nuclear power station under opposition leader Peter Dutton’s plan.
    Queensland State Archives

    Where does this leave us?

    It’s unlikely Queensland could hold such a plebiscite at or before the next federal election.

    But if the Coalition wins the next federal election and proceeds with its nuclear policy, Queensland would be obliged to hold a plebiscite – regardless of who wins the state election, unless its law was changed.

    This would make clear how much support there was for nuclear power. A clear rejection wouldn’t have any legal effect, but could well achieve the same outcome through political pressure. We might also see other states follow suit to hold plebiscites on nuclear power, although none currently are legally obliged to do so.

    Anne Twomey has received funding from the Australian Research Council and sometimes does consultancy work for governments, Parliaments and inter-governmental bodies.

    – ref. Queensland Premier Steven Miles is promising to hold a vote on nuclear power. Here’s why – https://theconversation.com/queensland-premier-steven-miles-is-promising-to-hold-a-vote-on-nuclear-power-heres-why-241254

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

    January 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Australia: Interview with Nadia Mitsopoulos, Perth Mornings, ABC Radio

    Source: Australian Treasurer

    NADIA MITSOPOULOS:

    Well, we have spoken a lot about that fee you are charged when you use your debit card. Put simply, you hate it and it feels particularly unfair when you are forced to use that card by a business which is no longer taking cash. Well, the federal government is finally listening and it looks like it will get rid of these charges. How far will it go? When will this happen, if it does? Let’s get more from Stephen Jones, who is the Assistant Treasurer. Good morning and thank you for joining me.

    STEPHEN JONES:

    Nadia, good to be back with you.

    MITSOPOULOS:

    First of all, these fees, how much are they costing Australians every year?

    JONES:

    Look, industry sources say as much as $4 billion a year is being charged in one fee or another. All of that ends up with the consumer in one way or another. So, that’s a lot of money. We’re particularly concerned about debit card fees. That’s the one where you get charged a surcharge to access your own money to pay for a cup of coffee. Consumers are rightly had enough of it. As you said in your introduction, they feel like it’s harder and harder to get cash, harder and harder to use it, and then you’re getting whacked with a surcharge fee when you’re paying with a tap‑and‑go everywhere from a coffee shop to a restaurant to a hotel, and we’ve had a look at it, the practice has got to stop. Consumers are being ripped off. It’s time to end the rip‑off.

    MITSOPOULOS:

    Ok, I’ll talk more about ending the rip‑off in a moment. But who pockets it? Is it the bank, the business or the merchant?

    JONES:

    Really good question. The one we’re pretty certain it’s not is the small business. And if you look at the fees that are being charged small businesses, sometimes they’re being charged twice the fee that a large retailer like a Coles or a Woolworths would be charged to use those electronic payment methods. So, it’s definitely not the small business. They’re passing on a cost which is imposed on them by the bank, by the payment service providers and by the card provider. So, that’s your Visa cards, your Mastercards, your EFTPOS’. Then there’s the system that nobody knows about, which is the payments network, which transmits all the payments traffic around the country from bank to bank and from system to system. And the banks are in there as well. They’re at the front end of all of it. So, there’s at least 3 different players here, very opaque about the way the costs are charged. They all end up at a consumer. They look like a small charge, but they all add up and they punch a big hole in the wallet of the consumer in the takings of a small business.

    MITSOPOULOS:

    Do you agree that, well, first of all, these charges have been creeping up, but it’s more than the cost of doing that transaction. What consumers are being charged?

    JONES:

    Well, for the small business, they’re passing on, in most instances, some, but not all of the cost. Some small businesses say that they’ll just lose market share if they’re passing on the entire cost of using those charging mechanisms that they don’t. Many of them do if they’re able to. So, it’s not the cost of the small business. But if you’re asking me, are the banks or the card providers or the payment system providers making a healthy profit out of all of this, the answer is absolutely.

    MITSOPOULOS:

    Okay, so what’s your plan? What do you plan to do?

    JONES:

    We want to do this in a smart way. We want to ensure that whatever we do, particularly around banning of debit charge surcharges, debit card surcharges, we don’t just whack the small business. So, you stop the small business charging it, but they’re still copying that fee from the bank and the payment system providers. So, we’ve got to ensure that we get all ends of this sorted out so that we don’t save the consumer a dollar, but that just gets passed on in another way by the small business. So, we’ve got the Reserve Bank having a look at it using its powers over the next couple of months. They’ll hand us a report by the end of the year. We’ll look at the proposals in the first few months of next year. But we’re sending a very clear message to the market, to the operators, the banks, the card providers, the payment system providers, a very clear message to all of them – this has got to stop. And we are willing to impose a ban on it by the beginning of 2026 at the latest if these guys do not get their act together.

    MITSOPOULOS:

    And so you would then be banning the banks and the merchants from charging this fee because the concern is the small business could still be charged the fee and then can’t pass it on.

    JONES:

    Yeah, and you’ve got to the heart of it. That’s what we’re adamant we don’t want to do. We don’t want to create an elusive benefit for consumers, but the small business cops it in the neck. So, we’re not going to do that. We’ve got to ensure that we protect the position of the small business and the consumer. And somebody somewhere further up the chain, they’re going to have to review their pricing mechanisms. A lot of really opaque and tricky things have gone on over the last year or so in this area. Things like blended pricing, where they’re charging the same for a credit card transaction as they are for a debit card transaction when they’re completely different. So, a bunch of these things we’re going to get to the bottom of. But the thing that your listeners can be absolutely certain of, we’re going to protect the interests of small business. We’re going to protect the interests of consumers.

    MITSOPOULOS:

    Stephen Jones, the Assistant Treasurer, is my guest this morning. So, this will only apply if you go down this path, will only apply to debit cards, not credit cards.

    JONES:

    That’s where the biggest problem is, and they are very different transactions. As your listeners and all know, when you’re using a debit card, you’re accessing your own money to pay for something. It’s the modern form of cash.

    MITSOPOULOS:

    It’s the tap‑and‑go.

    JONES:

    It’s the tap‑and‑go, and it’s the modern form of cash, particularly for young people. Increasingly, young people won’t have a credit card, but they will have a debit card, or they might have some other form of buy now, pay later, but most of their transactions will go on a debit card for good reasons. They don’t want to rack up an interest bill. They also don’t want to rack up all the charges that they’re getting through these opaque surcharges. So, that’s why we’re focusing on this. It’s the biggest part of the big problem.

    MITSOPOULOS:

    Minister, why can’t you do this now? Why do you have to wait till 2026?

    JONES:

    Because we don’t want to do something that looks popular but actually ends up hitting small business in the neck. We want to ensure that we do this in a way that protects the interests of small business and gets the benefit for consumers. That’s why we’ve got to work through these things, and we’ll probably have to use a couple of different levers. Nothing is stopping the banks and the payment system providers getting ahead of the game by the way.

    MITSOPOULOS:

    And when we look at retail transactions, only about 12 per cent of those are now made using cash. Is using a card a cheaper way of doing business? I mean, again, we’re being charged for it, but is that cheaper than moving cash around?

    JONES:

    Certainly cheaper for the banks. It’s certainly cheaper for the big retailers and probably a lot of the smaller ones as well. If you think of it like – there’s always been a cost involved in using cash. It’s just not very transparent. When somebody’s got to go to the bank, get the money out to put the float in the till, somebody’s then got to add all of that up at the end of the day and take the bags of money back to the bank for safekeeping. There’s a cost involved in all of that and it’s just embedded in the price of the goods. The difference between the cost involved in money and the cost involved in electronic transactions is that they are very, very transparent from a consumer point of view because you can see them on your bill. We need to ensure that all of it’s transparent all the way upstream so that all the payment providers, the banks, the card providers are being very clear about what they’re charging and for what, and then we get a better deal for consumers.

    MITSOPOULOS:

    But a ban, are you certain that a ban is on the cards?

    JONES:

    Absolutely.

    MITSOPOULOS:

    You’ve just got to work out how to do it.

    JONES:

    Best way of doing it. That’s exactly right.

    MITSOPOULOS:

    When we look at bank profits, the feeling is they could probably absorb this charge. Do you agree?

    JONES:

    I agree that between the banks, the payment system providers, the card providers, all of these are participants in the scheme. It’s not always obvious to consumers. They just think it’s the bank. But there’s actually 3 or 4 different players in there and there is people in all up the stream who are clipping the ticket. The consumers are paying and it’s got to stop.

    MITSOPOULOS:

    I’ll leave it there. Appreciate your time. Thank you.

    JONES:

    Good to be with you.

    MIL OSI News –

    January 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: Atos appoints Philippe Salle Chairman of the Board of Directors with effect from October 14, 2024 and Chairman and Chief Executive Officer from February 01, 2025

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      Press release

    Atos appoints Philippe Salle Chairman of the Board of Directors with effect from October 14, 2024

    and Chairman and Chief Executive Officer from February 01, 2025

    Paris, France, 15 October 2024 – Atos today announces the appointment of Philippe Salle as Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company with immediate effect and as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer with effect from February 01, 2025.

    In the context of the Group’s financial restructuring, the Nominations and Governance Committee chaired by Lead Independent Director Elizabeth Tinkham, conducted a rigorous selection process with the support of an internationally renowned recruitment firm and in consultation with selected Company creditors.

    At its meeting on October 14, 2024, the Board of Directors approved unanimously, on the recommendation of the Nominations and Governance Committee:

    • the co-optation of Philippe Salle as a Director, subject to ratification by shareholders at the next Annual General Meeting;
    • his appointment as Chairman of the Board of Directors with immediate effect; and
    • his appointment as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer with effect from 1st February 2025.

    With extensive experience as CEO, notably in listed companies, Philippe Salle will bring invaluable skills and insights to support the deployment of the business plan and the restructuring of the Group.

    Jean-Pierre Mustier will act as Chief Executive Officer of the Company until January 31, 2025, and remain a member of the Board of Directors, ensuring an orderly, constructive and effective transition. In particular, he will be responsible for monitoring and ensuring the proper implementation of the accelerated safeguard plan, which is essential for the Group.

    The Board meeting of October 14, 2024 also noted Philippe Salle’s intention to participate in the financial restructuring of the Company by investing a total amount of at least €9 million in the Company. This investment would take the form of a subscription to the right issue with preferential subscription rights, decided in the context of the accelerated safeguard plan, if the conditions for completion so permit, or subsequently directly on the market.

    Jean-Pierre Mustier, Chief Executive Officer of Atos, said: ” I am delighted to welcome Philippe Salle to the Board. Philippe Salle is a highly experienced executive whose qualities and expertise in leading blue-chip companies will be a crucial asset as Atos looks to the future. He has also an extensive track record in creating shareholders value. We will work closely together to ensure a smooth transition and the effective deployment of the Group’s business and restructuring plan, in the interests of all stakeholders.”

    Philippe Salle, Chairman of the Board of Directors of Atos, said: “It is with great enthusiasm and conviction that I join the Atos Group. I am aware of the challenges that lie ahead, but also of the Group’s strengths, from the quality of its services to the ongoing commitment of its employees, which will enable us, together, to open a new chapter in the Group’s history.”

    About Philippe Salle

    Philippe Salle began his career with Total in Indonesia in 1988. He then joined Accenture in 1990 where he was promoted to senior consultant. He joined McKinsey in 1995 and became senior manager in 1998. He joined the Vedior group in 1999 (now Randstad, a company listed on Euronext Amsterdam), and became Chairman and CEO of Vedior France in 2002. He became a member of the Executive Board in 2003 and was appointed Head of Southern Europe in 2006. In 2007, he joined the Geoservices group (sold to Schlumberger in 2010), a technology company in the oil sector and under LBO, first as Deputy CEO and then as Chairman and CEO. In June 2011, Philippe Salle was appointed Chairman and CEO of Altran Group (a company listed on Euronext Paris), an engineering consultancy and world leader in innovation. In April 2015, Philippe Salle was appointed Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Elior Group (a company listed on Euronext Paris), a world leader in catering and services. In December 2017, Philippe Salle was appointed Chief Executive Officer of Emeria (a company under LBO), the world’s leading provider of real estate services and technologies.

    Philippe Salle has also served as Chairman of the Board of Directors of Viridien (formerly CGG) since 26 April 2018, and as a member of the Board of Directors of Banque Transatlantique since 2010.

    Philippe Salle is a graduate of the Ecole des Mines de Paris and holds an MBA from the Kellogg Graduate School of Management, Northwestern University (Chicago, USA). He is a Chevalier de l’ordre national du Mérite, Chevalier de la Légion d’honneur and Commandeur de l’ordre du Mérite de la République italienne.

    ***

    About Atos

    Atos is an international leader in digital transformation with around 92,000 employees and annual revenues of €10 billion. The European leader in cloud computing, cybersecurity and supercomputing, the Group provides integrated solutions to all sectors, in 69 countries. A pioneer in decarbonisation services and products, Atos is committed to delivering secure, decarbonised digital solutions to its customers. Atos is an SE (Société Européenne) listed on Euronext Paris.

    Atos’ raison d’être is to help shape the information space. With its skills and services, the Group supports the development of knowledge, education and research in a multicultural approach and contributes to the development of scientific and technological excellence. Everywhere in the world, Atos enables its customers and employees, and more generally the greatest number of people, to live, work and progress sustainably and with complete confidence in the information space.

    Contacts

    Investor Relations: David Pierre-Kahn | investors@atos.net | +33 6 28 51 45 96

    Individual shareholders: 0805 65 00 75

    Press contact: globalprteam@atos.net

    Attachment

    • PR – Atos appoints Philippe Salle

    The MIL Network –

    January 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI China: Policy to boost cotton industry in Xinjiang

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    The Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs has pledged more support to help the Xinjiang Uygur autonomous region reclaim its vast areas of infertile land and expand its competitive edge in growing long-staple cotton — a crop that underpins a sprawling supply chain that stretches from textile production in Guangdong province to the fashion industry in Shanghai.

    Minister Han Jun had a meeting with regional government officials on Saturday, during which he announced that his administration would enhance policy measures to support Xinjiang in increasing its comprehensive crop production capacity, including for long-staple cotton, according to a media release on the ministry’s website.

    The support will be provided in areas such as treating saline-alkali land, promoting water-efficient irrigation technologies, and sponsoring the research, development and dissemination of homegrown cotton-picking machines.

    “Continued efforts will be made to promote the development of high-quality long-staple cotton,” the release quoted the minister as saying.

    Home to more than 90 percent of China’s annual cotton output, Xinjiang has remained the top provincial-level jurisdiction in terms of both cotton output and productivity for the past three decades.

    The use of machines in cotton harvesting in the region has also soared in recent decades to over 85 percent, with domestic branded machines emerging as the predominant choice in the industry, Xinhua News Agency has reported.

    As part of a national campaign to raise China’s crop output and self-sufficiency, Xinjiang launched a program earlier this year to boost cotton productivity through initiatives such as promoting higher-yielding varieties.

    Data published earlier this month by local authorities revealed significant progress.

    Output has surpassed 11.5 metric tons per hectare in an experimental field spanning approximately 7 hectares, with over 8.4 tons achieved in a demonstration zone covering about 670 hectares.

    These figures represent a substantial improvement compared to the mainstream cotton varieties planted across Xinjiang, which typically yield from 6 to 7.5 tons per hectare.

    More importantly, the increased yield had not affected the quality of the harvest, local authorities stressed.

    In some areas, including Kashgar, a major cotton-growing region, AI-powered breeding techniques have been deployed to develop cotton varieties endowed with traits such as drought tolerance and pest resistance.

    The next-generation varieties, coupled with smart farming management that has minimized the use of fertilizers and pesticides, have improved productivity to almost 8 tons per hectare at a local experimental field.

    The ministry’s announcement coincided with an increased effort to utilize otherwise infertile areas for crop production as China aims to expand planting areas and ensure self-sufficiency for key materials amid vulnerable global supply chains and more frequent extreme weather events.

    At a meeting in July last year, central authorities emphasized the need to tap the potential of saline-alkali land and increase overall agricultural production capacity.

    They called for better use of abandoned and nonconventional farmland, and more funding for related research. They also highlighted the significance of development model innovations in overcoming the natural constraints of farmland scarcity.

    Efforts to enhance the cotton industry in Xinjiang, once home to some of the nation’s most entrenched poverty, are also part of a national rural vitalization initiative.

    Erkin Tuniyaz, chairman of the region, said at the meeting that efforts will be made to vigorously increase the production of important agricultural products, including cotton, and strengthen the development of high-standard farmland that is more resilient to extreme weather.

    He said the government will spare no effort in promoting the prosperity and stable income growth of agricultural and pastoral areas, and make more contributions to ensure national food security and the supply of important agricultural products.

    With an aim to improve the added value of cotton production, Liang Yong, a national political adviser and director of Xinjiang’s cotton industry development leading group office, told China Daily that there is a need to further bolster the development of Xinjiang’s cotton-textile-apparel industry chain.

    “This entails facilitating more cotton-related manufacturing in Xinjiang relocated from the eastern regions, and driving forward the convergence of the cotton and petrochemical industries,” he said.

    MIL OSI China News –

    January 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Inquiries – Auditor General inquiry into Oranga Tamariki welcomed, but must go wider – PSA

    Source: PSA

    The Auditor General’s inquiry into Oranga Tamariki’s cuts to funding community services must go further with the axe hanging over social service providers funded by other government agencies.
    “The inquiry is welcome as this was a botched and heartless process which impacted critical support for children, flying in the face of the Government’s promise that its cuts would not hit the frontline,” said Melissa Woolley, Assistant Secretary for the Public Service Association Te Pūkenga Here Tikanga Mahi.
    “Oranga Tamariki was blind to the damage inflicted on tamariki, rangatahi and whānau from this rushed cut to contracts. In many cases there was no evidence to justify contracts being axed or funding being reduced.
    “Oranga Tamariki failed to communicate with providers, many of which had built up services over many years. There was little warning, and they had salt rubbed into their wounds by the Minister for Children, claiming many were abusing the funds, labelling Oranga Tamariki a ‘cash cow’ for them. They deserved better.”
    The sudden and deep cuts left many of those providing the services scrambling to make ends meet, resulting in job losses and the loss of critical support for many.
    “Many of our members including social workers now face losing their jobs, or hours being cut, and at a time of a cost-of-living crisis, many were already struggling to make ends meet.
    “These workers take pride in the difference they make to lives of the young every day. They care deeply about the children and whānau in their care. They too deserved better.
    “The Government’s drive to cut spending is impacting the whole funded sector – other community providers supporting various social services receive funding from agencies like the Ministry of Social Development and the Ministry of Health. We know many are facing cuts which we believe are poorly thought through just like Oranga Tamariki.
    “The PSA urges the Auditor General to expand the scope if his inquiry before more damage is inflicted on providers and their workers who are doing the mahi to improve the health and wellbeing of so many in our community.
    “The blame must ultimately be sheeted home to the Government which has embarked on this cost cutting campaign with little regard to the consequences,” said Melissa Woolley.
    Other recent PSA releases on this issue:
    3 September: Govt cuts mean Salvation Army frontline workers face axe https://www.psa.org.nz/our-voice/govt-cuts-mean-salvation-army-frontline-workers-face-axe/
    7 August: Minister’s statement about community providers false and offensive https://www.psa.org.nz/our-voice/ministers-statement-about-community-providers-false-and-offensive/
    The Public Service Association Te Pūkenga Here Tikanga Mahi is Aotearoa New Zealand’s largest trade union, representing and supporting more than 95,000 workers across central government, state-owned enterprises, local councils, health boards and community groups.

    MIL OSI New Zealand News –

    January 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Banking: Human-centered Design Improves Transport in Ulaanbaatar’s Ger Areas

    Source: Asia Development Bank

    ADB used human-centered design for the Improving Transport Services in Ger Areas project. Prior to the start of the project, ADB conducted a detailed needs assessment, engaging residents in Ulaanbaatar’s ger areas to understand what improving transport meant for community members instead of defaulting to usual problem statements and solutions. The project conducted focus group discussions with residents including persons with disabilities, older people, school children, women and other community members. 

    The team then engaged closely with four community representatives—a person with disability, an elderly woman, a young girl, and a mother with three young children—to deeply understand their experiences through visual journey maps.  

    Using body cameras, the residents went through their daily travels to show pain points and issues they encountered along their journeys. The project addressed the identified challenges of accessibility and usability, personal safety and security, and road safety through system-wide interventions.  

    At the end of the project, the residents visually mapped their journeys again, but this time, they tried out the improved infrastructure and systems that they wanted addressed at the project’s start.  Ramps, low-floor buses, bus announcement speakers, better located stairs and crossings responded to accessibility issues. Bus driver training, security cameras, crime-prevention through environmental design, public communication on harassment, and feedback mechanisms responded to concerns about personal safety. Pedestrian crossings, lane demarcation, clear signage, footpaths, speed bumps, and better designed bus shelters with relevant information on routes, schedules and other transport information addressed road safety concerns.  

    The project was supported by the Municipality of Ulaanbaatar, the Public Transport Department, JFPR and EAPKF.

    Watch the other videos on the individual stories of the person with disability, mother with young children, young girl and an elderly woman, and how their inputs influenced the project’s technical design:

    Transcript

    Stories helped design this project. Partnerships built it.

    The project, Improving Transport Services in Ger Areas used human-centered design to understand user needs and design appropriate interventions.

    Byambadorj’s story filmed before the project started told us that designs cannot ignore those who travel differently.  

    The slope is very steep. 

    To go down, I have to go inch by inch, like this.

    I can only go up this steep ramp with someone else’s assistance.  

    Curb ramps should be done according to standards.

    For a person on a wheelchair, boarding a bus is a miracle.  

    It would be better if buses have ramps.

    Using Byambadorj’s story, discussions with other users, and technical review, we built new ramps in strategic places for safety and access.  

    The Public Transport Department ensured accessible low-floor buses with ramps would be used on the Chingeltei corridor to aid in mobility.

    Before the project started, Tserenbadam’s stories and stakeholder consultations emphasized that commuters deserve safer driving practices, accurate information, and a way to easily report incidents.

    Sometimes there is a long wait for the bus.

    Those with better legs would run to the bus stop.

    Bus drivers talk on the phone a lot while on the road.

    One bus is racing with another bus.

    They often race with each other to get more passengers.  

    From Tserenbadam’s stories and other user insights, we developed a customer feedback system for commuters to report issues.  

    Bus schedules and other information are visibly displayed in new bus stops.    

    Bus drivers were trained in safe driving and customer service. CCTV cameras inside buses monitor driver and passenger behavior for improved commuting experiences.

    Uzmee’s stories highlighted that infrastructure must accommodate the needs of vulnerable road users across seasons.

    There should be barriers on roadsides because children have high risk of running onto the road.

    We should analyze the frequently used exits and entrances, then put stairs where necessary.  

    A proper bus shelter would be a refuge from the cold for children.

    These stories, with road safety auditing and information from the traffic police, helped identify key areas to add speed bumps, pedestrian crossings, and stairs.

    We installed bus shelters for weather protection, comfort and information.  

    Infrastructure design removed blind spots, enforce security and prevent crime.    

    Throughout the project, we engaged with civil society and established a community council for sustainable change.  

    Infrastructure built.  

    Systems installed.  

    Enforcement in place.  

    Driver behavior improved.  

    Community mobilized.

    Stories helped design this project.

    Partnerships built it.  

    With ADB, JFPR and EAPKF support, the local government and community are taking ownership of people’s safe, and inclusive mobility. 

    MIL OSI Global Banks –

    January 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Banking: Disasters Trigger More Displacements than Conflicts, Says New ADB-IDMC Report

    Source: Asia Development Bank

    MANILA, PHILIPPINES (15 October 2024) — Global disasters accounted for more displacements in 2023 than conflict and violence, and governments and multilateral development banks must invest more to prevent and manage these crises, according to a new report jointly authored by the Asian Development Bank (ADB) and the Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre (IDMC).

    The report found that last year, 26.4 million internal displacements—or forced movements within one’s country—were caused by disasters, compared to 20.5 million caused by conflict and violence.

    The report, Harnessing Development Financing for Solutions to Displacement in the Context of Disasters and Climate Change in Asia and the Pacific, found most of the disaster displacement recorded globally in the past 10 years occurred in Asia and the Pacific, with 177 million internal displacements reported during 2014−2023. ADB’s developing member countries (DMCs) accounted for 95% of that total—more than 168 million displacements. The report warns that the effects of climate change will likely increase the scale, duration, and severity of displaced persons globally.

    “Addressing displacement in the context of climate change and disasters is a significant challenge for the region,” said ADB Vice-President Fatima Yasmin. “However, we know what needs to be done and how to do it. Development and adaptation finance channeled through multilateral development banks, such as ADB, can support member countries in addressing the root causes of displacement through sector investments, technical assistance, and cofinancing.”

    “Disaster displacement can upend lives, cost countries billions of dollars, and set back development efforts by years, but it doesn’t have to be this way,” said IDMC Director Alexandra Bilak. “Investments in disaster risk reduction and climate adaptation plans can reduce the scale and negative impacts of displacement. The payoff could be huge.”

    The report outlines several ways development finance can be used to prevent and respond to displacement. Multilateral development banks can support and encourage displacement-inclusive policies and investments, better national data systems, and raise awareness for countries to include displacement in their development strategies.

    The report says governments also need to better reflect their priorities to reduce displacement through specific and concrete measures in the national development plans, adaptation and disaster risk reduction plans, and nationally determined contributions, and to better recognize the complexity of displacement occurring in the context of climate change.

    ADB is committed to achieving a prosperous, inclusive, resilient, and sustainable Asia and the Pacific, while sustaining its efforts to eradicate extreme poverty. Established in 1966, it is owned by 69 members—49 from the region.

    MIL OSI Global Banks –

    January 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: ING completes share buyback programme

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    ING completes share buyback programme

    ING announced today that it has completed the share buyback programme which was announced on 2 May 2024. The total number of ordinary shares repurchased under the programme is 155,990,753 at an average price of €15.94 for a total consideration of €2,486,329,696.95.

    During the last week of the programme, from 7 October 2024 up to and including 11 October 2024, 11,348,429 shares were purchased. These shares were repurchased at an average price of €15.78 for a total amount of €179,022,796.36.

    As previously announced, we will give an update on our capital planning with the presentation of our third quarter 2024 results, which is scheduled for 31 October 2024.

    For detailed information on the daily repurchased shares, individual share purchase transactions and weekly reports, see the ING website at https://www.ing.com/Investor-relations/Share-information/Share-buyback-programme.htm .

    Note for editors

    For more on ING, please visit http://www.ing.com. Frequent news updates can be found in the Newsroom or via X @ING_news feed. Photos of ING operations, buildings and its executives are available for download at Flickr.

    ING PROFILE
    ING is a global financial institution with a strong European base, offering banking services through its operating company ING Bank. The purpose of ING Bank is: empowering people to stay a step ahead in life and in business. ING Bank’s more than 60,000 employees offer retail and wholesale banking services to customers in over 40 countries.

    ING Group shares are listed on the exchanges of Amsterdam (INGA NA, INGA.AS), Brussels and on the New York Stock Exchange (ADRs: ING US, ING.N).

    ING aims to put sustainability at the heart of what we do. ING’s sustainability efforts have been recognised externally by environmental, social and governance (ESG) rating agencies and other benchmarks. In 2023, Sustainalytics assessed our management of ESG material risk as ‘strong’. In August 2024, ING’s ESG rating by MSCI was reconfirmed as ‘AA’. ING’s shares are included in the sustainability indices of Euronext, STOXX, FTSE Russell and Morningstar. Society is transitioning to a low-carbon economy. So are our clients, and so is ING. We finance a lot of sustainable activities, but we still finance more that’s not. Follow our progress on ing.com/climate.

    Important legal information

    Elements of this press release contain or may contain information about ING Groep N.V. and/ or ING Bank N.V. within the meaning of Article 7(1) to (4) of EU Regulation No 596/2014 (‘Market Abuse Regulation’).

    ING Group’s annual accounts are prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the European Union (‘IFRS- EU’). In preparing the financial information in this document, except as described otherwise, the same accounting principles are applied as in the 2023 ING Group consolidated annual accounts. All figures in this document are unaudited. Small differences are possible in the tables due to rounding.

    Certain of the statements contained herein are not historical facts, including, without limitation, certain statements made of future expectations and other forward-looking statements that are based on management’s current views and assumptions and involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results, performance or events to differ materially from those expressed or implied in such statements. Actual results, performance or events may differ materially from those in such statements due to a number of factors, including, without limitation: (1) changes in general economic conditions and customer behaviour, in particular economic conditions in ING’s core markets, including changes affecting currency exchange rates and the regional and global economic impact of the invasion of Russia into Ukraine and related international response measures (2) changes affecting interest rate levels (3) any default of a major market participant and related market disruption (4) changes in performance of financial markets, including in Europe and developing markets (5) fiscal uncertainty in Europe and the United States (6) discontinuation of or changes in ‘benchmark’ indices (7) inflation and deflation in our principal markets (8) changes in conditions in the credit and capital markets generally, including changes in borrower and counterparty creditworthiness (9) failures of banks falling under the scope of state compensation schemes (10) non-compliance with or changes in laws and regulations, including those concerning financial services, financial economic crimes and tax laws, and the interpretation and application thereof (11) geopolitical risks, political instabilities and policies and actions of governmental and regulatory authorities, including in connection with the invasion of Russia into Ukraine and the related international response measures (12) legal and regulatory risks in certain countries with less developed legal and regulatory frameworks (13) prudential supervision and regulations, including in relation to stress tests and regulatory restrictions on dividends and distributions (also among members of the group) (14) ING’s ability to meet minimum capital and other prudential regulatory requirements (15) changes in regulation of US commodities and derivatives businesses of ING and its customers (16) application of bank recovery and resolution regimes, including write down and conversion powers in relation to our securities (17) outcome of current and future litigation, enforcement proceedings, investigations or other regulatory actions, including claims by customers or stakeholders who feel misled or treated unfairly, and other conduct issues (18) changes in tax laws and regulations and risks of non-compliance or investigation in connection with tax laws, including FATCA (19) operational and IT risks, such as system disruptions or failures, breaches of security, cyber-attacks, human error, changes in operational practices or inadequate controls including in respect of third parties with which we do business and including any risks as a result of incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise flawed outputs from the algorithms and data sets utilized in artificial intelligence (20) risks and challenges related to cybercrime including the effects of cyberattacks and changes in legislation and regulation related to cybersecurity and data privacy, including such risks and challenges as a consequence of the use of emerging technologies, such as advanced forms of artificial intelligence and quantum computing (21) changes in general competitive factors, including ability to increase or maintain market share (22) inability to protect our intellectual property and infringement claims by third parties (23) inability of counterparties to meet financial obligations or ability to enforce rights against such counterparties (24) changes in credit ratings (25) business, operational, regulatory, reputation, transition and other risks and challenges in connection with climate change and ESG-related matters, including data gathering and reporting (26) inability to attract and retain key personnel (27) future liabilities under defined benefit retirement plans (28) failure to manage business risks, including in connection with use of models, use of derivatives, or maintaining appropriate policies and guidelines (29) changes in capital and credit markets, including interbank funding, as well as customer deposits, which provide the liquidity and capital required to fund our operations, and (30) the other risks and uncertainties detailed in the most recent annual report of ING Groep N.V. (including the Risk Factors contained therein) and ING’s more recent disclosures, including press releases, which are available on http://www.ING.com.

    This document may contain ESG-related material that has been prepared by ING on the basis of publicly available information, internally developed data and other third-party sources believed to be reliable. ING has not sought to independently verify information obtained from public and third-party sources and makes no representations or warranties as to accuracy, completeness, reasonableness or reliability of such information.

    Materiality, as used in the context of ESG, is distinct from, and should not be confused with, such term as defined in the Market Abuse Regulation or as defined for Securities and Exchange Commission (‘SEC’) reporting purposes. Any issues identified as material for purposes of ESG in this document are therefore not necessarily material as defined in the Market Abuse Regulation or for SEC reporting purposes. In addition, there is currently no single, globally recognized set of accepted definitions in assessing whether activities are “green” or “sustainable.” Without limiting any of the statements contained herein, we make no representation or warranty as to whether any of our securities constitutes a green or sustainable security or conforms to present or future investor expectations or objectives for green or sustainable investing. For information on characteristics of a security, use of proceeds, a description of applicable project(s) and/or any other relevant information, please reference the offering documents for such security.

    This document may contain inactive textual addresses to internet websites operated by us and third parties. Reference to such websites is made for information purposes only, and information found at such websites is not incorporated by reference into this document. ING does not make any representation or warranty with respect to the accuracy or completeness of, or take any responsibility for, any information found at any websites operated by third parties. ING specifically disclaims any liability with respect to any information found at websites operated by third parties. ING cannot guarantee that websites operated by third parties remain available following the publication of this document, or that any information found at such websites will not change following the filing of this document. Many of those factors are beyond ING’s control.

    Any forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of ING speak only as of the date they are made, and ING assumes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information or for any other reason.

    This document does not constitute an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to purchase, any securities in the United States or any other jurisdiction.

    Attachment

    • ING completes share buyback programme

    The MIL Network –

    January 23, 2025
  • MIL-Evening Report: Banning debit card surcharges could save $500 million a year – if traders don’t claw back the money in other ways

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Angel Zhong, Associate Professor of Finance, RMIT University

    Galdric PS/Shutterstock

    In a move that could reshape how Australians pay for everyday purchases, the federal government is preparing to ban businesses from slapping surcharges on debit card transactions.

    This plan, pending a review by the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA), promises to put money back into consumers’ pockets.

    The RBA, which is accepting submissions until December, released its first consultation paper on Tuesday to coincide with Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Treasurer Jim Chalmers’ joint announcement.

    But as with any significant policy shift, it’s worth taking a closer look to see what it really means for all of us.

    How much are we really saving?

    Based on RBA data, the potential savings are huge – up to $500 million a year if surcharges on debit cards are banned.

    And if the government goes one step further and includes credit card transaction fees in the ban, those savings could hit a massive $1 billion annually.

    While these figures sound impressive, when you break it down, the savings per cardholder would amount to around $140 annually.

    It’s not a life-changing amount, but for frequent shoppers or anyone making larger purchases, it could add up.

    Of course, not everyone will benefit equally. Those who shop less might not notice the difference.

    How does Australia stack up globally?

    RBA data shows Australians are paying more in merchant service fees than people in Europe, but less than consumers in the United States.

    These fees are what businesses pay to accept card payments, and they get passed on to us in the form of surcharges.



    The proposed ban on debit card surcharges occupies a middle ground in the global regulatory landscape. The European Union, United Kingdom and Malaysia have implemented comprehensive bans on surcharges for most debit and credit card transactions.

    But in the US and Canada, businesses can still charge you for using a credit card, though debit card surcharges aren’t allowed.

    The merchant’s perspective

    While the surcharge ban seems like a clear win for consumers, it’s essential to consider the impact on merchants, especially small businesses. The reality is not all merchants are created equal when it comes to card payment fees.

    In Australia, there’s a significant disparity between the fees paid by large and small merchants. In fact, RBA data shows small businesses pay fees about three times higher than what larger businesses pay.

    It all comes down to bargaining power. Bigger businesses can negotiate better deals on fees. This difference is primarily driven by the ability of larger merchants to thrash out favourable wholesale fees for processing card transactions.

    For small businesses, the cost of accepting cards can range from under 1% to more than 2% of the transaction value, which can eat into profits, especially for those working with tight margins.

    While the ban may sound like good news for consumers, there’s still a need to fix the bigger issues in the payment system. Innovations like “least-cost routing”, which allows businesses to process transactions at the lowest possible cost, could potentially help level the playing field.

    How businesses might exploit the loopholes?

    If payment costs are entirely passed on to merchants, they might find ways to recover those expenses through other means. We’ve seen this happen in other countries that abolished surcharges. Some potential strategies include

    • slightly raising overall prices to cover lost surcharge revenue
    • implementing or increasing minimum purchase requirements for card payments
    • introducing new “service” or “convenience” fees for all transactions, or increasing weekend and holiday surcharges.

    Most of these tactics have been around for a while. The challenge for regulators will be to monitor and address any new practices that emerge in response to the new rules.

    Credit cards: the elephant in the room

    While the ban on debit card surcharges is a step in the right direction, it raises an obvious question: why not extend it to credit cards?

    The option to ban credit card surcharges along with debit cards is proposed in the RBA’s review consultation paper. The answer lies in the complex web of interchange fees and merchant costs associated with credit card transactions.

    Credit card transactions cost merchants more to process because of additional services and rewards programs offered by credit card issuers.

    Banning surcharges on these could potentially lead to merchants increasing their base prices to cover these costs. This could effectively result in users of lower-cost payment methods subsidising those opting for premium cards.

    The absence of surcharges could also reduce the competitive pressure on card networks to keep their fees in check, potentially leading to higher costs in the long run.

    Some countries have managed to ban surcharges on credit cards, but they usually have stricter regulations around interchange fees than we do in Australia.

    As policymakers grapple with this complex issue, they must weigh the benefits of consumer simplicity against the risk of distorting market signals and potentially increasing costs for both merchants and consumers alike.

    Angel Zhong does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    – ref. Banning debit card surcharges could save $500 million a year – if traders don’t claw back the money in other ways – https://theconversation.com/banning-debit-card-surcharges-could-save-500-million-a-year-if-traders-dont-claw-back-the-money-in-other-ways-241354

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

    January 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: Lands Department extends coverage of 3D Digital Maps

    Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

    Lands Department extends coverage of 3D Digital Maps
    Lands Department extends coverage of 3D Digital Maps
    ****************************************************

         The Lands Department (LandsD) today (October 15) launched a 3D Visualisation Map of Kowloon West and New Territories Northwest, and a 3D Indoor Map of Kowloon West.           The 3D Visualisation Map of Kowloon West and New Territories Northwest covers around 63 600 buildings and about 770 infrastructure facilities, including flyovers, footbridges and subways. The 3D Indoor Map of Kowloon West covers around 70 buildings, including government and private buildings and community facilities, and provides information on floors, units and points-of-interest for promoting innovative indoor data applications, such as location-based services, tourism and indoor navigation.           Moreover, the coverage of the “Streetscape 360” function of the 3D Visualisation Map, which offers 360-degree street-level panoramic images, has been extended from Kowloon East and Kowloon Central to Kowloon West, Lantau and New Territories Northwest.           The datasets of the abovementioned 3D Digital Maps, relevant Application Programming Interface and sample codes are available on the Common Spatial Data Infrastructure Portal (portal.csdi.gov.hk) and the online application platform “Open3Dhk” (3d.map.gov.hk) for free download by the public to facilitate the development of web services and smart applications by the innovation and technology sector and academia.           To promote smart city development, the LandsD will continue to develop and release 3D Digital Maps for other districts.

     
    Ends/Tuesday, October 15, 2024Issued at HKT 14:00

    NNNN

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News –

    January 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI China: MOFA response to false claims by China’s foreign ministry regarding Taiwan

    Source: Republic of Taiwan – Ministry of Foreign Affairs

    MOFA response to false claims by China’s foreign ministry regarding Taiwan

    October 10, 2024 

    At a regular press conference held on the afternoon of October 10, China’s foreign ministry falsely claimed that Taiwan had “no so-called sovereignty” and urged “the few foreign politicians who visit Taiwan to correct their wrong words and deeds.” 

     

    President Lai Ching-te clearly stated in his National Day address on October 10 that neither the Republic of China (Taiwan) nor the People’s Republic of China was subordinate to the other. He also emphasized that Taiwan was willing to work with China to address climate change, combat communicable diseases, and maintain regional security in the pursuit of peace and mutual prosperity for the well-being of both peoples.

     

    The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) reiterates that ideological narratives or threats will neither alter the fact that Taiwan is a democratic country with 23 million peace- and freedom-loving people nor hinder Taiwan from forging closer connections and interactions with the international community.

     

    MOFA calls on China to recognize the goodwill that President Lai expressed in his National Day address and squarely face the reality of the situation across the Taiwan Strait. Instead of continuing to cause apprehension and disturbances in the surrounding region, China should attempt to once again align with the rules-based international order so as to contribute to regional peace, stability, prosperity, and positive cross-strait development.

    MIL OSI China News –

    January 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI China: MOFA sincerely thanks international community for taking concrete actions to support Taiwan’s UN participation

    Source: Republic of Taiwan – Ministry of Foreign Affairs

    October 4, 2024
    No. 058

    The General Debate of the 79th session of the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) concluded on September 30. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) sincerely thanks the diplomatic allies, like-minded countries, and friends from around the world who expressed support for Taiwan’s participation in the UN and refuted China’s deliberate misrepresentation of UNGA Resolution 2758 in various ways, both in the chamber and on the sidelines of the event. 

    High-level government officials from Taiwan’s diplomatic allies Paraguay, the Marshall Islands, Palau, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Eswatini, Tuvalu, Saint Christopher and Nevis, Saint Lucia, and Belize spoke up for Taiwan at the UN General Debate and Summit of the Future. Officials from the Marshall Islands, Palau, Tuvalu, and Saint Lucia explicitly pointed out that UNGA Resolution 2758 did not preclude Taiwan’s participation in the UN system. Following similar remarks in 2022, US President Joe Biden again used his speech to the UN General Debate to spell out the United States’ commitment to maintaining peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait. Australia mentioned the Taiwan Strait for the first time at the UN General Debate, with Minister for Foreign Affairs Penny Wong stating that Australia had consistently pressed China on peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait.  

    At a US House of Representatives Committee on Foreign Affairs hearing held a few days before the UN General Debate, US Deputy Secretary of State Kurt Campbell criticized China for using UNGA Resolution 2758 as a diplomatic tool to suppress Taiwan’s status. In response to a question in parliament, Dutch Minister of Foreign Affairs Caspar Veldkamp openly acknowledged that the resolution had nothing to do with Taiwan. Following a meeting on the sidelines of the UNGA held by the Group of Seven (G7) foreign ministers and the European Union high representative for foreign affairs and security policy, the chair of the meeting released a statement reaffirming the importance of cross-strait peace and stability to international security and prosperity as well as supporting Taiwan’s international participation. 

    Joint statements expressing a high regard for cross-strait peace and stability were issued after other recent high-level meetings, including the Quad leaders’ summit, the seventh high-level meeting of the EU-US Dialogue on China, the US-Japan summit meeting, the UK-US Strategic Dialogue, the Japan-Australia Foreign and Defence Ministerial Consultations, the Republic of Korea-New Zealand bilateral meeting, and the Lithuania-US Strategic Dialogue on the Indo-Pacific.

    In terms of legislative branches, the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China passed a model resolution on UNGA Resolution 2758 on July 30 for its members’ reference. The Australian Senate, the Dutch House of Representatives, and the Guatemalan Congress have since adopted motions in support of Taiwan based on the model resolution. The Foreign Affairs Committee of the Italian Chamber of Deputies also approved a resolution backing Taiwan’s international participation, demonstrating staunch support for Taiwan.

    Speaking for the first time on the sidelines of the UNGA at the annual summit of the New York-based nonprofit organization Concordia through prerecorded remarks, President Lai Ching-te told the UN family that Taiwan would strive to maintain regional peace and stability and urged the international community to support Taiwan’s participation.  Ambassador Alexander Tah-ray Yui, Representative to the United States, held a discussion with former US Under Secretary of State for Economic Growth, Energy, and the Environment Keith Krach on cross-strait peace and security and Taiwan’s campaign to participate in the UN. During the UNGA, Taiwan cohosted a seminar in New York with the United States, Japan, Australia, and Canada under the Global Cooperation and Training Framework. The event underscored Taiwan’s resolve to contribute to the global community.

    MOFA also appreciates the unwavering support of the Legislative Yuan. A cross-party delegation of legislators—including Ngalim Tiunn, Wu Tsung-hsien, and Wu Chun-cheng—visited New York during the UNGA to provide guidance and take part in related activities. The group powerfully conveyed the strong desire of the Taiwanese people to be part of the UN system.

    Through an international publicity and new media campaign, the government effectively communicated Taiwan’s demands for UN participation to all quarters. An op-ed by Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung, letters to the editor from Taiwan’s overseas missions, and interviews with Taiwanese ambassadors and representatives appeared 455 times in mainstream international media outlets. These included the Diplomat, the Hill, the Washington Times, National Review, and the New York Sun in the United States; Modern Diplomacy and the European Business Review in the European Union; the National Post in Canada; Le Figaro in France; Norrbottens-Kuriren in Sweden; La Razón in Spain; De Telegraaf and Nederlands Dagblad in the Netherlands; Euractiv in Greece; Rzeczpospolita in Poland; La Verità and Le Formiche in Italy; the Sankei Shimbun in Japan; the Chosun Ilbo in the Republic of Korea; the Philippine Star in the Philippines; the Hindustan Times and the Tribune in India; the Jerusalem Post in Israel; La Razón in Peru; the Eswatini Observer in Eswatini; La Nación in Paraguay; O Tempo in Brazil; Jelen in Hungary; and the Daily News in Thailand. 

    The short promotional film IC You received more than 25.4 million views—again breaking the record for Taiwan’s annual campaign. During the UNGA, MOFA and its overseas missions released 2,922 posts about Taiwan’s bid on social media platforms including Facebook, X, Instagram, and Threads. The posts were seen over 48.378 million times and received an unprecedentedly warm response. A short animation video, UNity through Peace: Chip in with Taiwan, was shown on a large billboard in New York City’s iconic Times Square. The advertisement featured elements including semiconductor circuits and Taiwan’s contributions to achieving the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The video conveyed Taiwan’s strengths in IC technology, highlighted its image as a responsible member of the global community, and broadened worldwide recognition and support for Taiwan’s call for international participation.

    MOFA reiterates that UNGA Resolution 2758 does not mention Taiwan. The resolution therefore has nothing to do with Taiwan and cannot serve as the basis for precluding Taiwan from the UN system and other international organizations. Taiwan is determined, willing, and able to contribute to the global community. Continuing to exclude Taiwan from multilateral endeavors will not only be a loss to humanity but also detrimental to realizing the SDGs. To uphold the UN principle of leaving no one behind, MOFA again calls on the UN to stop bowing to pressure from China and swiftly allow Taiwan’s full participation. (E)

    MIL OSI China News –

    January 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI China: Foreign Minister Lin and his wife host welcome luncheon for Guatemala First Lady Peinado and her delegation

    Source: Republic of Taiwan – Ministry of Foreign Affairs

    Foreign Minister Lin and his wife host welcome luncheon for Guatemala First Lady Peinado and her delegation

    • Date:2024-10-10
    • Data Source:Department of Latin American and Caribbean Affairs

    October 10, 2024

    No. 346

    Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung and his wife hosted a welcome luncheon on October 9 for a delegation from the Republic of Guatemala led by First Lady Lucrecia Peinado. On behalf of the government, Minister Lin warmly welcomed First Lady Peinado on her first visit to Taiwan and thanked her for representing President Bernardo Arévalo at the 2024 National Day celebrations, thereby enhancing bilateral diplomatic relations.

     

    Minister Lin stated that Taiwan and Guatemala were loyal partners that had enjoyed remarkable success in joint endeavors in such domains as public health, medicine, agricultural technology, higher education, and basic infrastructure. He pointed out that under proactive efforts by the governments of the two countries, economic and trade exchanges had grown closer. Noting that numerous Taiwanese businesses were interested in investing and setting up manufacturing facilities in Guatemala, Minister Lin said that this was a concrete outcome of economic and trade diplomacy promoted by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in its implementation of integrated diplomacy.

     

    First Lady Peinado conveyed President Arévalo’s congratulations on Taiwan’s National Day and thanked Taiwan for its long-standing assistance to Guatemala’s development in various areas. Emphasizing that Taiwan was an important member of the global community, she said that Guatemala would continue supporting Taiwan’s international participation. First Lady Peinado reaffirmed the importance that President Arévalo placed on attracting business investment, as well as his keen interest in developing the semiconductor sector. She expressed the hope that the two countries would further deepen cooperation and jointly help transform Guatemala into a technologically advanced country. 

     

    Minister Lin and First Lady Peinado also exchanged in-depth views on several issues, including women’s empowerment, care for disadvantaged groups, talent cultivation, and bilateral collaboration. Both agreed that Taiwan and Guatemala, building on the existing solid foundation, would continue to bolster reciprocal and mutually beneficial bilateral cooperation. (E)

    MIL OSI China News –

    January 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI China: Foreign Minister Lin hosts welcome dinner for Tuvalu Prime Minister Teo and his wife

    Source: Republic of Taiwan – Ministry of Foreign Affairs

    Foreign Minister Lin hosts welcome dinner for Tuvalu Prime Minister Teo and his wife

    • Date:2024-10-10
    • Data Source:Department of East Asian and Pacific Affairs

    October 10, 2024
    No. 345

    Prime Minister of Tuvalu Feleti Penitala Teo and Madame Tausaga Teo led a delegation to Taiwan to attend National Day celebrations. Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung hosted a dinner for the delegation on October 9, extending a heartfelt welcome on behalf of the government.

    Minister Lin welcomed Prime Minister Teo on his second visit to Taiwan since assuming office in February. He said that Prime Minister Teo’s presence, this time as a guest of honor at National Day celebrations, underscored the immense importance he placed on the diplomatic partnership between Taiwan and Tuvalu. Minister Lin noted that this year marked the 45th anniversary of diplomatic relations and that Tuvalu was Taiwan’s longest-standing Pacific ally. He said that Taiwan would build on this existing robust foundation to further deepen cooperation with Tuvalu in such important domains as climate change, ICT, medicine and health care, talent cultivation, women’s empowerment, and basic infrastructure.

    Minister Lin expressed special appreciation for Prime Minister Teo’s staunch support for Taiwan’s international participation over the years. He thanked Prime Minister Teo for speaking up for Taiwan at this year’s United Nations General Assembly (UNGA), for reiterating that UNGA Resolution 2758 did not preclude Taiwan’s participation in the UN, and for strongly urging the UN to include Taiwan so as to truly “leave no one behind.”

    Prime Minister Teo began his remarks by thanking Taiwan for inviting him to visit and wishing Taiwan a happy National Day and continued prosperity. He stated that in addition to attending National Day celebrations, he would also travel to southern Taiwan to engage in exchanges with fisheries operators so as to enhance bilateral fisheries cooperation. Stressing that Taiwan and Tuvalu had enjoyed an enduring friendship and realized significant achievements in many areas of collaboration, Prime Minister Teo said that the two countries would continue to work together to enhance the well-being of both their peoples. 

    As October 9 also happened to be Prime Minister Teo’s birthday, Minister Lin had prepared a birthday cake to celebrate the occasion. In the warm and cordial atmosphere of the gathering, members of the visiting delegation performed traditional Tuvaluan songs in a show of Austronesian culture. Colleagues from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs sang a selection of Taiwanese songs in return. (E)

    MIL OSI China News –

    January 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Asia New Zealand Foundation and The Asia Foundation announce strategic partnership

    Source: Asia New Zealand Foundation

    Wellington, New Zealand and San Francisco, CA – 15 October 2024 – The Asia New Zealand Foundation Te Whītau Tūhono and The Asia Foundation are pleased to announce a new formal collaborative partnership to deepen ties between Asia and New Zealand.
    This collaboration aligns with the Asia New Zealand Foundation’s 30 th anniversary and aims to support more research initiatives and dialogues across the Asia region.
    For three decades, the Asia New Zealand Foundation has been dedicated to growing New Zealand’s Asia capability through initiatives that support experiences and insights on Asia. The Asia Foundation (TAF), with its extensive network of 17 permanent offices across 20 countries dedicated to improving lives and expanding opportunities across Asia and the Pacific, is a natural partner.
    “This partnership represents a significant step forward in our efforts to strengthen New Zealand’s engagement with Asia,” says Suzannah Jessep, chief executive of the Asia New Zealand Foundation. “As the Asia region becomes increasingly complex, demand for the Foundation’s work has grown, particularly in the realm of track 1.5 and track 2 dialogues.”
    “We are delighted to deepen our collaboration with the Asia New Zealand Foundation, an important and thoughtful voice on Asia. This partnership reflects our shared interest in finding meaningful new ways for Asia and New Zealand to deepen collaboration,” adds Laurel Miller, President and CEO of The Asia Foundation.
    Key areas of the partnership will include convening meetings and roundtables, bilateral, trilateral, and/or regional dialogues, spearheading joint research projects and launching a signature conference on Asia and contemporary issues in the region to be held in New Zealand.
    Since 1954, TAF has supported governments, innovative leaders and communities in Asia to build effective institutions, strengthen civic engagement and advance pathbreaking reforms. With a 70-year history of enduring impact, the international nonprofit continues to deliver benefits both within individual countries and throughout the region.
    “Given the importance of Asia to New Zealand, it is timely to build partnerships that can help expand our reach and understanding of the region. The Asia Foundation has tremendous network and expertise across Asia, and we in turn can help connect TAF with New Zealand,” says Dr Julia Macdonald, director of research and engagement at the Foundation.
    The partnership between the Asia New Zealand Foundation and TAF represents a significant step toward supporting the Foundation’s vision of a ‘New Zealand confident in and with Asia’ and reinforces TAF’s commitment to a peaceful, just and thriving Asia-Pacific.
    About the Asia New Zealand Foundation Te Whītau Tūhono
    Established in 1994, the Asia New Zealand Foundation Te Whītau Tūhono is New Zealand’s leading authority on Asia. Its mission is to equip New Zealanders to thrive in Asia, by providing experiences and resources to build knowledge, skills and confidence. The Foundation’s activities cover more than 20 countries in Asia and are delivered through eight core programmes: arts, business, entrepreneurship, leadership, media, research, Track II diplomacy and sports.
    About The Asia Foundation
    The Asia Foundation is a nonprofit international development organization committed to improving lives and expanding opportunities across Asia and the Pacific. Informed by 70 years of experience and deep local knowledge, TAF’s thought leadership, partnerships and activities focus on governance, climate action, gender equality, education and leadership, inclusive growth, and international cooperation. 

    MIL OSI New Zealand News –

    January 23, 2025
←Previous Page
1 … 1,749 1,750 1,751 1,752 1,753 … 1,899
Next Page→
NewzIntel.com

NewzIntel.com

MIL Open Source Intelligence

  • Blog
  • About
  • FAQs
  • Authors
  • Events
  • Shop
  • Patterns
  • Themes

Twenty Twenty-Five

Designed with WordPress