Category: Politics

  • MIL-OSI USA: “A BIG WIN”: Supreme Court Ends Excessive Nationwide Injunctions

    US Senate News:

    Source: US Whitehouse
    class=”has-text-align-center”>“Today’s decision restores the proper separation of powers between the branches of government. Ending nationwide injunctions is a tremendous victory for the American people and the rule of law.” — White House Counsel David Warrington
    No longer can rogue, activist judges abuse their authority to dictate the executive powers of the President of the United States, the Supreme Court ruled — a massive victory for the Constitution, the rule of law, and the presidency itself.
    Since the moment President Trump took office, low-level activist judges have been exploiting their positions to kneecap the agenda on which he was overwhelmingly elected. In fact, of the 40 nationwide injunctions filed against President Trump’s executive actions in his second term, 35 of them came from just five far-left jurisdictions: California, Maryland, Massachusetts, Washington, and the District of Columbia.
    Now, the Trump Administration can promptly proceed with critical action to save the country — like ending birthright citizenship, ceasing sanctuary city funding, suspending refugee resettlement, freezing unnecessary funding, stopping taxpayers from funding transgender surgeries, and much more.
    The Supreme Court’s commonsense decision was rightly hailed as a huge win:
    President Trump: “The Supreme Court has delivered a monumental victory for the Constitution, the separation of powers, and the RULE OF LAW in striking down the excessive use of nationwide injunctions … I was elected on a historic mandate, but in recent months, we’ve seen a handful of radical left judges effectively try to overrule the rightful powers of the president to stop the American people from getting the policies that they voted for in record numbers. It was a grave threat to democracy.”
    Attorney General Pam Bondi: “Americans are finally getting what they voted for. No longer will we have rogue judges striking down President Trump’s policies across the entire nation — no longer.”
    CNN chief legal affairs correspondent Paula Reid: “This is a big win for President Trump because he has been railing against these so-called nationwide injunctions … The justices are agreeing with Trump and limiting this power that judges have to block a policy for the entire country.”
    CNN senior legal analyst Elie Honig: “Such a big win for the Trump Administration and … the Office of the President.”
    Attorney Jonathan Turley: “I think that the Trump Administration has very good reason to celebrate. These district court judges have really tied down the administration.”
    Sen. John Kennedy: “Anybody who knows a law book from an L.L. Bean catalog knows that federal judges just made up this concept of universal injunctions … They just made it up because they don’t agree with what a President or Congress has done.”
    MSNBC legal analyst Melissa Murray: “This is a huge win for the Trump administration.”
    The New York Times: “A major victory for President Trump”
    NBC News: “A major win to the Trump administration”
    New York Post: “Major win”
    Reuters: “Win for Trump”
    Politico: “Supreme Court hands Trump major win”

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: S. 298, Returning SBA to Main Street Act

    Source: US Congressional Budget Office

    Bill Summary

    S. 298 would require the Small Business Administration (SBA) to relocate 30 percent of its employees from its headquarters in Washington, D.C., to regional offices throughout the United States and reduce its headquarters office space by 30 percent. Those changes would be contingent upon the agency determining that they would reduce costs to the federal government.

    Estimated Federal Cost

    The estimated budgetary effect of S. 298 is shown in Table 1. The costs of the legislation fall within budget function 370 (commerce and housing credit).

    Table 1.

    Estimated Changes in Spending Subject to Appropriation Under S. 298

     

    By Fiscal Year, Millions of Dollars

     
     

    2025

    2026

    2027

    2028

    2029

    2030

    2025-2030

    Salaries and Benefits

                 

    Estimated Authorization

    *

    -4

    -10

    -8

    -2

    -2

    -26

    Estimated Outlays

    *

    -3

    -9

    -9

    -3

    -2

    -26

    Overhead Expenses

                 

    Estimated Authorization

    0

    5

    6

    -5

    -5

    -5

    -4

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    4

    6

    -3

    -5

    -5

    -3

    Total Changes

                 

    Estimated Authorization

    *

    1

    -4

    -13

    -7

    -7

    -30

    Estimated Outlays

    *

    1

    -3

    -12

    -8

    -7

    -29

    Basis of Estimate

    CBO assumes that S. 298 will be enacted near the end of fiscal year 2025, that the SBA would not begin to relocate employees until 2026, and that the Congress would reduce annual appropriations by the estimated amounts each year. Outlays were estimated using historical obligation and spending rates.

    Spending Subject to Appropriation

    CBO estimates that implementing S. 298 would decrease spending subject to appropriation by $29 million over the 2025-2030 period. The Congress appropriated $974 million for the SBA’s administrative expenses in fiscal year 2025.

    Salaries and Benefits. S. 298 would require the SBA to relocate 30 percent of its employees currently assigned to work at the headquarters in Washington, D.C., to regional offices throughout the United States within one year and to adjust their compensation for the new location. Additionally, employees would no longer be allowed to telework unless they qualify for an accommodation under the Americans with Disabilities Act.

    There are currently about 900 full-time employees assigned to work at the SBA headquarters; under the bill, about 270 employees would need to be relocated. CBO assumes that half of those employees would relocate in 2026, and half would choose to leave the agency. CBO expects that it would take about two years for the SBA to hire new employees at regional offices to replace those that leave the agency. The lag in hiring new employees accounts for about 50 percent of the estimated reduction in costs for salaries and benefits.

    Salaries and benefits for federal employees vary by location. Based on information from the SBA, CBO expects that the average salaries and benefits of those employees in 2026 would decrease from about $208,000 to $201,000. Employees that relocate would be eligible to receive amounts to cover their household’s transportation expenses, temporary housing, and assistance with selling and purchasing a home.

    Using information from the Department of Agriculture, which relocated two subagencies in 2019, CBO estimates that average relocation expenses would be about $70,000 per employee. Additionally, some employees that leave the SBA would be eligible for severance averaging about $55,000 per employee. After accounting for anticipated inflation, attrition, and the time required to hire new employees, CBO estimates that implementing S. 298 would reduce the costs of SBA’s salaries and benefits by $26 million over the 2025-2030 period. Any reduction in spending would be subject to future appropriations being reduced by the estimated amounts.

    S. 298 also would require the SBA to report within six months on the number of employees at its headquarters who would be eligible to be relocated and a plan for implementing those changes. CBO estimates that the report would cost less than $500,000.

    Overhead Expenses. S. 298 also would require the agency to reduce office space at its headquarters location by 30 percent within two years. Using information from the SBA, CBO estimates that overhead expenses (including rent, security, and telecommunications services) for the affected employees at SBA headquarters totaled about $6 million in 2025 compared to costs of about $1.5 million at regional offices for the same number of employees.

    Finally, the SBA would require assistance from the General Services Administration (GSA) to locate and set up additional office space in regional offices. Using information from GSA, CBO estimates that the new working and meeting space, furniture and workstation purchases, and installation of information technology and audiovisual equipment would cost $10 million. CBO expects those costs would be incurred in 2026 and 2027.

    After accounting for inflation, attrition, and the time required for hiring and acquiring space and under the assumption that the SBA would reduce its office space in Washington, D.C., CBO estimates that implementing the bill would reduce overhead costs for the SBA by $3 million over the 2025-2030 period. Any reduction in spending would be subject to future appropriations being reduced by the estimated amounts.

    Uncertainty

    CBO’s estimate of S. 298 is subject to uncertainty because determining how many employees would relocate and the costs associated with their relocation is uncertain. For example, if the SBA paid severance to those that choose to leave the agency, decided not to hire new employees to offset expected attrition, or paid higher or lower relocation expenses, the actual costs could be higher or lower than those estimated.

    Additionally, if employees chose to retire and collect retirement benefits earlier than they would under current law, spending on retirement benefits, which are recorded in the budget as direct spending, would change.

    Pay-As-You-Go Considerations

    Enacting the bill would not affect direct spending or revenues; therefore, pay-as-you-go procedures do not apply.

    Increase in Long-Term Net Direct Spending and Deficits

    CBO estimates that enacting S. 298 would not increase net direct spending or on-budget deficits in any of the four consecutive 10-year periods beginning in 2036.

    Mandates

    The bill contains no intergovernmental or private-sector mandates as defined in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act.

    Estimate Reviewed By

    Justin Humphrey
    Chief, Finance, Housing, and Education Cost Estimates Unit

    Kathleen FitzGerald 
    Chief, Public and Private Mandates Unit

    H. Samuel Papenfuss 
    Deputy Director of Budget Analysis

    Phillip L. Swagel

    Director, Congressional Budget Office

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Canada: Minister Tim Hodgson Speech to the Toronto Region Board of Trade June 25, 2025

    Source: Government of Canada News

    Good morning,

    It’s great to be speaking to all you right here, in the heart of Toronto. This is where I worked for the last 15 years, and I’m thrilled to see so many familiar faces in the crowd.

    I want to express my sincere thanks to Giles, Roselle, Leslie, Dominic and the Toronto Region Board of Trade for putting on this great event.

    The GTA is one of the key engines of the Canadian economy. It will play an important part of this government’s Build Canada agenda. From finance to advanced manufacturing to clean tech to AI to innovation and more, Toronto and Ontario are not just regional powerhouses — they are key drivers of national progress.

    I have seen first-hand how the many businesses that call the GTA home are driving the growth and prosperity of this country. For example, most recently, I served as Chair of Hydro One’s board, witnessing with my own eyes the role that great, Ontario-based companies, like Hydro One, are playing in keeping Canada powered, productive and prosperous.

    That is one experience that I bring to this new government — but I have been equally shaped by my background, my roots and the path that brought me here. And I wanted to start there.

    My family’s relationship with this province begins with my father immigrating to Canada after World War II.

    His family were tenant farmers who worked the farms owned by the “lord” in the old country. But they wanted a better life and dreamed of owning their own farm, so they scraped together enough money to get on a steamer to Canada and start over on a small farm, just outside of Peterborough. A few years later, driven to experience all this country had to offer, my father joined the Royal Canadian Air Force. I came shortly thereafter and grew up as an Air Force brat, moving every year or two to bases across Canada. 

    This brought me everywhere, from a small fishing village of 200 people at the southern tip of Nova Scotia, to a tiny logging camp at the northern tip of Vancouver Island and many points in between, including in Ontario. Living in those small towns shaped my understanding of the value of hard work, the importance of good jobs in the trades and the rich cultural diversity that defines our country’s regions.

    Following in my father’s footsteps, when I was 17 I joined the Canadian Armed Forces. The Armed Forces are where I learned what service means — and what it feels like to fight for something bigger than oneself.

    It was a similar instinct to serve — years later — that brought me to the Bank of Canada under then-Governor Mark Carney, as we were rebuilding the Canadian economy at the end of the great financial crisis. And it was that instinct that led me to pick up the phone again earlier this year, when Mr. Carney suggested there was another opportunity to serve this great country, in this pivotal moment.

    In between my time in the Armed Forces and this spring, however, I spent most of my professional life working in the private sector, including right here in Toronto. In those roles, I learned a lot about the energy and resource industries that are — by many metrics — the most significant economic engines of this country.

    I helped finance potash mines and OSB mills. I did initial public offerings for utilities and uranium companies. I also worked on pipelines like the Alliance Pipeline that brings Canadian gas to the Chicago market.

    Those experiences have shaped me. And they’ve taught me this: Leadership is not about talk. It’s about action when it matters most. It’s about getting things done and doing them right. It’s about building for the next generation — or as Indigenous Peoples teach us, the next seven generations — and being proud of what we are handing them.

    The Prime Minister likes to say that we are standing at a hinge moment in Canada’s history. I think that is undeniably true. The post WWII-Bretton Woods world order is now over. Global supply chains are being torn apart and need to be rebuilt. Our climate is changing, and we need to retool our economy to reflect that reality.

    On top of all that, we find ourselves in the middle of the most devastating trade war of our lifetimes. A trade war we did not ask for, but a trade war we must win.

    Ultimately, we are facing a new world order defined by one thing, above all else: instability.

    But here’s the thing Canadians need to know: this moment is creating opportunities that we can seize.

    As you saw this week, we are seizing the chance to work with our European allies on a new EU-Canada Strategic Partnership of the Future, which will focus on trade and economic security, the digital transition and the fight against climate change and environmental degradation and includes a Security and Defence Partnership, which is an intentional first step toward Canada’s participation in Security Action for Europe (SAFE), an instrument of the ReArm Europe Plan/Readiness 2030.

    Importantly, participation in this initiative will create significant defence procurement and industrial opportunities for Canada — including right here in Ontario.

    There’s a saying that applies to this moment: a crisis is a terrible thing to waste. And waste it, we will not. And I know we can do it, because we have done it before. But it will take more than just resolve. It will take speed, ambition and, most importantly, unity.

    During and after the Second World War — perhaps the last time we faced such a transformational upheaval of the world order — Canadians did not hesitate. We united and did great things. We mobilized our workforce and industrial base with staggering speed. We built more than 16,000 aircraft, nearly 9,000 ships and over 800,000 military trucks.

    Canada — a country just shy of 12 million people at the time — raised an Armed Forces of 1.1 million men and women, who fought bravely for our way of life.

    When the war was over, the Canadian government built homes for the veterans who needed them. We retooled our economy and learned to thrive in a new world order. Through hard work, grit and smarts, we transformed our country.

    That transformation built a middle class. It built an identity. It built a sense of collective confidence that would define our postwar decades — and continues to make us proud to stand under the maple leaf.

    As one wartime poster proclaimed: “Every Canadian must fight.” It showed a soldier and a factory worker standing side by side.

    Now, we must stand side by side once again, from coast to coast to coast, Indigenous and non-Indigenous, industries, small businesses and entrepreneurs. We need that same spirit today. And we can find it — in our communities, in our businesses, in our labour movement, in our innovators and in every region of this country that is hungry to contribute.

    Your government is working hard to lay the foundation for just that.

    Last week, The House of Commons passed the One Canadian Economy Act — what I would say is a nation-defining piece of legislation.

    The Act is about building faster, moving people and goods more freely and unlocking the potential of Canadian workers, communities and resources in every part of this country. It creates the conditions to get more projects off the ground — projects that benefit our national interest and bubble up from Indigenous Peoples, provinces, territories and the private sector.

    We know that if we want to build faster, we can’t be duplicating regulatory efforts, delaying decisions or creating bottlenecks between jurisdictions. We must act like a single country — not a patchwork.

    That’s why this legislation creates a Major Projects Office that will coordinate and expedite reviews — reviews focused on how the project will be built as opposed to whether it will be built. For proponents, they will now have just one point of contact to make sure things stay on track.

    Crucially, an Indigenous Advisory Council will be an integral component of this Office. The Council, along with consultation with Indigenous Peoples and rigorous environmental review, will inform a single set of binding federal conditions for the project. These conditions will include mitigation measures to protect the environment and to respect the rights of Indigenous Peoples.

    To ensure consultation is done right, the federal government is also investing $40 million for capacity building to strengthen Indigenous participation in the assessment and consultation process. 

    Moreover, to continue to put Indigenous Peoples at the centre of this nation-building initiative, the first thing we will do to launch the implementation of this legislation is full-day summits with First Nations, Inuit and Métis rights holders, leadership and experts. The first summit will be on July 17, where the Prime Minister will meet with First Nations rights holders. The goal here is to create certainty that catalyzes investment.

    As someone who has spent most of my career allocating capital, I believe it is important that Canadians understand that to achieve the certainty that leads to investment and prosperity we must reduce inefficiency, harmonize standards and improve transparency.

    When businesses see inconsistent rules, unclear timelines or duplicative review processes, they hesitate to invest. And when they hesitate, projects stall, costs climb and opportunities vanish. But when our federal, provincial and territorial governments send clear signals — that we are serious, coordinated and committed to delivery — investment follows.

    Certainty invites boldness. It turns ambition into action. It gives industry, investors and trading partners confidence that Canadian projects will get built and Canadian goods will get to market. It creates the prosperity we need to pay for our way of life.

    Let me say that again: it creates the prosperity we need to pay for our way of life.

    This Act puts us back on that path. And crucially, we are going to do this responsibly — with transparency, partnership, the environment, labour standards and economic reconciliation at the heart of our efforts.

    The Act also tackles a long-standing issue: internal trade barriers. For decades, it has been easier to export a product abroad than to ship it between provinces. Frankly, that is just illogical and inefficient. These barriers have cost Canadians as much as $200 billion in lost opportunities every year — equivalent to around $50,000 for every Canadian.

    As the Prime Minister likes to say, we can give ourselves more than anyone can take away.

    This Act lays the groundwork for that ideal, through greater labour mobility, credential recognition and open trade across provinces and by reframing the conversation so we can build things in this country again.

    This Act allows us to reset that narrative about building in Canada — so we can go from delay to delivery.

    So, what does delivery look like? It begins with a vision: to build Canada into a conventional and clean energy and natural resources superpower.

    I want to dive into that a bit deeper with you all today. Because, in my mind, that encompasses two things: energy security and energy economics.

    Energy security means sovereignty — over our destiny, our industries, our wallets and our climate. It means being able to heat our homes in January, power our farms in July and run our factories all year long, without worry about what is happening outside of our borders.

    It means using the best, cleanest products: the ones produced right here in Canada.

    It means developing our unparallelled critical minerals wealth and helping the world transition to a cleaner climate without relying on countries that we cannot trust.

    We will get that security and sovereignty by ensuring we have the ports, roads, railways and energy infrastructure in place to sell our products to allies who share our values, not just our borders.

    Energy economics means competitiveness — using our natural advantages to drive investment, grow exports and raise wages.

    Together, our products — our resources — can make us both safer and wealthier.

    And here’s the thing: this is not just about GDP. It’s about building the kind of Canada where a rising tide lifts all boats.

    I’d like to quote something Premier Wab Kinew said at the First Minister’s Meeting earlier this month. He said: This is a generational opportunity for Canadians — but also for some of the poorest communities in our country. If we can put the road, transmission and pipe infrastructure in place to build out those opportunities, this country won’t just be better off in terms of GDP growth — we’ll be better off in making sure every Canadian kid can reach their full potential.”

    A kid in the north or rural Canada needs the same opportunities as a kid in our biggest cities. That’s what becoming an energy superpower is really about.

    This is important to me because I have watched it happen. I went to a vocational high school in Winnipeg, and many of my classmates didn’t go to university. One of my best friends spent 25 years on the rigs. His job bought him a home. It financed a good life. That’s how it should be. And we should respect the hardworking Canadians who do these important jobs.

    During the election, I went door to door in my riding, about 45 minutes north of here. I heard the same thing from new Canadians, over and over: we came here to build a better life. Just like my family did, 80 years ago.

    They know, like we do in this room, that because of the opportunity Canada offers — through jobs in sectors like energy, mining and forestry — it’s the best country in the world.

    And that’s what we need to protect. A Canada where hard work still pays off. Where good jobs — with or without a degree — are available for future generations.

    Now, when it comes to delivering on significant, ambitious energy projects, Ontario certainly knows a thing or two. That’s why this province has been a word-class nuclear leader for over half a century.

    The story of nuclear energy in Ontario is emblematic of just how Canada can do great things.

    In the late 1950s and 60s, Canadians developed the first CANDU reactor. Two decades later, the first commercial CANDUs came online in Pickering. Since then, Ontario has become home to 16 of Canada’s 17 commercial reactors.

    Today, 58 percent of Ontario’s electricity comes from nuclear. The sector employs over 89,000 Canadians, contributes 15 percent of our national electricity supply and adds $22 billion to the economy every year. We have exported our nuclear technology around the world, helping countries achieve energy security and avoiding over 30 million tonnes of pollution annually.

    And our reactors do more than keep the lights on. They have made our air cleaner. They have provided a good life and livelihoods for thousands and thousands of Ontarians. And they produce a significant amount of the world’s supply of cobalt-60, a vital medical isotope used to sterilize equipment and treat cancer.

    Nuclear power is one of our greatest strategic assets. It’s clean. It’s reliable. And it’s built here, by Canadian workers and engineers, using Canadian uranium and technology.

    Now Ontario is poised to lead the next chapter, with small modular reactors. Ontario is already building Canada’s first grid-scale SMR at Darlington. But we’re not stopping there. Ontario is working closely with Alberta, Saskatchewan and New Brunswick — helping provinces at different stages of decarbonization build nuclear solutions that work for them.

    This is Team Canada in action. Provinces learning from each other. Utilities coordinating on design. Engineers collaborating across provincial borders. It’s a model of what a confident, connected Canada can do.

    Of course, it’s going to take more than one type of power — more than one solution — to power a strong, productive, retooled Canadian economy.

    Canada will need to at least double our electricity generation over the next two decades to power our industries, homes and technologies. This will require efficient, integrated electricity grids. Our new government is committed to working quickly with provinces and territories on east–west and north–south transmission interties. This is part of what the Prime Minister means when he says one economy, not thirteen.

    A pan-Canadian grid means more reliable, affordable sustainable power for Canadians. It means powering industries from AI to manufacturing. And it means exporting energy between provinces who want Canadian solutions.

    I know many of you in this room will be involved not just with clean and conventional energy, but with mining — another area in which this province is blessed with abundance. At the G7 two weeks ago, the world saw what we already knew: Canada is positioned to lead on critical minerals — not just in mining but across the entire value chain.

    We can and will extract our minerals sustainably, refine them responsibly and move them to market efficiently.

    During the G7, we announced a Critical Minerals Action Plan, backed by over $70 million in Canadian investments to support innovation, research and international partnerships. This effort will drive global demand for responsibly sourced materials — a move that could directly support new mining projects right here in Ontario.

    Moreover, we will launch the First and Last Mile Fund, to connect remote projects to roads, rails and grids.

    Simultaneously, we are backing Indigenous and community-led mineral development with financial tools.

    We do not want to just be a resource exporter. We want to be a value creator — from mine to EV battery to global supply chain. That is how we will build a stronger, sovereign economy and be masters in our own home.

    Beyond critical minerals, another pillar of the resource economy in this province and across our country is forestry. So I want to take a minute to speak to that today as well.

    Forestry sustains hundreds of thousands of good, Canadian jobs, supports rural and northern communities and provides one of the most sustainable building materials on earth.

    We need to treat our forestry sector not as old industry but as a vital part of our clean future. That means investing in value-added wood products. It means using engineered timber to accelerate modular housing. It means ensuring Canadian wood is the first material we reach for when we are building homes, schools and public infrastructure.

    We are already seeing innovation in prefab housing and modular design — made with Canadian wood, built by Canadian labour and creating Canadian solutions.

    If we want to build homes faster and more sustainably, we do not have to look far: the answer is growing in our forests.

    This all likely sounds ambitious — well, it is. But a key part of how we will make this successful is transforming how we think about Indigenous partnership in major projects.

    Indigenous Peoples are not just participants in our economy — they are rights holders. They are the original stewards of this land. They are governments. They are builders.

    If we are serious about retooling our economy, then economic reconciliation must be front and centre.

    I have seen what true partnership looks like — and how successful it can be for a project and a First Nation. When I served as Chair of the Board for Hydro One, we worked closely with Indigenous communities to build electricity transmission infrastructure that delivered power, created jobs and built long-term prosperity.

    Let me highlight one example. Last year, Hydro One built the Chatham to Lakeshore line under its new Indigenous Equity Partnership model. The project came in over a year ahead of schedule and 15 percent below budget.

    And I want to be clear: those amazing results occurred because of the strong consultation process and the significant equity ownership achieved by First Nations. Done the right way, First Nations involvement accelerated the project — it did not slow it down.

    To me, this approach stands as a model for how this country can and should build major infrastructure projects going forward.

    And it’s not an isolated case — it’s an emerging norm. And it’s a norm this government is committed to accelerating.

    By recognizing First Nations as key enablers — and by listening, engaging and building meaningful relationships rooted in trust and shared benefits — projects in this province and beyond can move forward on schedule, on budget and in a way that delivers real benefits to communities.

    That’s why we have expanded and doubled the Indigenous Loan Guarantee Program to $10 billion.

    Indigenous equity means revenue that stays in the community and can be passed down to the next generation. It means a generational transformation in how major projects get done. Because becoming an energy and resource superpower should benefit everyone.

    That also means labour. Simply put, none of this gets done without workers. Without the people who pour the concrete, wire the grids, mine the metals and weld the steel. The trades built this country. And they will build the next chapter, too.

    As Sean Strickland, the Executive Director of Canada’s Building Trades Unions, put it last week: “If we’re serious about building housing, energy, transportation and critical infrastructure, we need to empower workers and enable them to move across the country to get the job done.”

    That’s why we’re investing in apprenticeships, training and labour mobility. That’s why we’re aligning credentials across provinces — so a red seal in Nova Scotia means the same thing in Alberta or Ontario. And that’s why we’re building strong partnerships with Canada’s unions to get the job done right.

    At the end of the day, we did not ask for a trade war to be declared on us. But we are responding with purpose and finding solutions that will leave us better off in four years, and four decades.

    We did not ask for climate change. But we are meeting the challenge with innovation and a mission to do what is right.

    We did not ask for disrupted supply chains. But we are rebuilding them with resilience and creating jobs at home in the process.

    What we have done so far by passing the One Canadian Economy Act is not the end — it is the beginning.

    So let me close with a call to action.

    To business leaders: it is time to bring forward your best ideas.

    To Indigenous Peoples: it is time to lead with your vision and partnership.

    To provinces and territories: it is time to leverage thirteen parts to build the strongest whole.

    To workers and unions: it is time to double down on your skill, strength and determination.

    And to everyone in this room: it is time for ambition. It is time to be a real clean and conventional energy superpower.

    It is time to build. And together, we will.

    Thank you.

    MIL OSI Canada News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Jayapal Statement on SCOTUS Ruling Narrowing Judicial Power to Issue Nationwide Injunctions

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congresswoman Pramila Jayapal (7th District of Washington)

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — U.S. Representative Pramila Jayapal, Ranking Member of the Subcommittee on Immigration, Integrity, Security, and Enforcement, released the following statement regarding today’s Supreme Court decision limiting the power of judges to issue nationwide injunctions. 

    “This is a breathtakingly misguided decision from the Supreme Court that will create chaos, irreparable damage, and uneven application of the law across the country. It fundamentally undermines the system of checks and balances in this country by limiting the scope of nationwide injunctions, while also throwing into question whether or not Trump’s unconstitutional Executive Order on birthright citizenship will take effect.

    “Our legal system relies on judges and courts holding the Administration accountable when it violates the Constitution. Now, the Supreme Court majority has severely hamstrung federal courts’ ability to stop unconstitutional actions. Instead, we will have a patchwork of rulings that means one person’s constitutional rights may be protected, while another’s are not — depending on their zip code. This ruling is, as Justice Sonia Sotomayor said in her dissenting opinion, an ‘open invitation to bypass the Constitution,’ and as Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson said, an ‘existential threat to the rule of law.’ 

    “While the Supreme Court did not rule on the specific question of the merits of Trump’s unconstitutional attempts to strip away birthright citizenship, this ruling will now require class action lawsuits to be filed in multiple courts. Let me be clear: birthright citizenship is a constitutional right guaranteed by the 14th Amendment. No matter how hard the Trump Administration tries to undo it with the stroke of a pen, it remains wholly unconstitutional, and we will never give up the fight to rein in this unconstitutional action.”

    Issues: Government Reform & Ethics

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Labrador Letter: Fighting to Stop Vermont’s Anti-Faith Policy

    Source: US State of Idaho

    Home Newsroom Labrador Letter: Fighting to Stop Vermont’s Anti-Faith Policy

    Dear Friends,
    Brian and Julie Wuoti wanted to open their home to children in foster care. They had the space, the love, and the commitment to help kids who needed families. The state of Vermont stepped in and told them no.
    Why? Because the Wuotis refused to pledge they would affirm and promote any foster child’s chosen sexual orientation and gender identity, regardless of their deeply held religious beliefs. Vermont’s “Policy 76” requires all prospective foster parents to make this pledge or forfeit their ability to serve vulnerable children.
    When loving couples like the Wuotis and another family, the Gantts, refused to abandon their faith, Vermont denied them foster licenses entirely. Think about that for a moment. Vermont would rather leave children without families than allow people of faith to provide loving homes.
    This isn’t just misguided policy. It’s a fundamental violation of the First Amendment that puts ideology ahead of children’s welfare.
    That’s why my office joined a 22-state coalition challenging Vermont’s unconstitutional foster care policy. Foster parents shouldn’t be forced to choose between their faith and serving children in need.
    You might wonder why Idaho is getting involved in what’s happening in another state. The reason is that attacks on religious liberty and constitutional rights don’t stay contained to one state forever. Vermont’s policy is already being watched by activist officials across the country who want to copy it. If we don’t push back now, Idaho families of faith could face the same discrimination when they try to help children in foster care. We’re not waiting for that fight to come to our doorstep. My office joined this case by filing what’s called an amicus brief—which is Latin for “friend of the court.” It allows states like Idaho to weigh in on important cases even when we’re not directly involved, especially when the outcome could affect our own laws and citizens. When 22 state attorneys general file one together, it sends a strong message to the court that this isn’t just Vermont’s problem—it’s a threat to constitutional rights everywhere.
    Idaho has shown there’s a better way to help foster kids. Rather than imposing one-size-fits-all requirements that drive away faith-motivated families, we use targeted matching programs that place children with compatible families while protecting everyone’s constitutional rights. Our approach first licenses safe, stable homes through standard safety evaluations, then carefully matches children with families sharing similar values and backgrounds.
    Idaho law prioritizes placing children with foster parents of the same religious faith or tradition and explicitly protects foster parents from discrimination based on their sincere religious beliefs. The results speak for themselves. We’ve increased our foster home-to-child ratio from 0.75 to 0.9, successfully ended a temporary housing program for youth in foster care, and achieved placement stability where fewer than sixteen percent of foster children experience multiple placements.
    Vermont’s approach is not only constitutionally deficient but also counterproductive. It prevents faith-motivated families from serving children while also denying religious foster children the opportunity to be placed in homes that share their values. When government forces people to abandon their deeply held beliefs as a condition of public service, it violates the very foundation of religious liberty.
    This case matters far beyond Vermont’s borders. If states can condition foster care licensing on abandoning religious beliefs, what’s next? Will they require adoption agencies to violate their faith? Will they demand that religious schools teach content that contradicts their core beliefs? The precedent Vermont seeks to establish threatens religious liberty nationwide, and we must be proactive to stop it.
    I will continue standing with people of faith and for the constitutional rights of all Idahoans. We’ve proven that protecting those rights and serving children’s best interests aren’t competing goals; they’re complementary ones. Idaho families know that children thrive when they’re placed with families who share their values and can provide not just homes, but hope rooted in faith and love.
    Best regards,

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Canada: Statement by Minister Guilbeault on Canadian Multiculturalism Day

    Source: Government of Canada News

    OTTAWA, June 27, 2025 

    Canada’s cultural diversity stems from the many communities that have made this country their home.  On Canadian Multiculturalism Day, we proudly celebrate the rich cultural mosaic that shapes our country, from the traditions, languages and stories that nourish our collective identity to the many contributions of ethnocultural communities to our society.

    Since 1971, Canada has set itself apart as the first country to adopt an official multiculturalism policy, a commitment that was reinforced by the adoption of the Canadian Multiculturalism Act in 1988. Today, our government continues to stand against systemic racism and all forms of discrimination, so that everyone in Canada can reach their full potential, regardless or the colour of their skin, how they worship, or who they love.

    Together, let’s keep building a more inclusive Canada, where diversity is celebrated every day and where all cultures are respected and valued.

    As Minister of Canadian Identity and Culture and Minister responsible for Official Languages, I invite you to take part in the activities in your community to mark this special day.

    Happy Canadian Multiculturalism Day!

    MIL OSI Canada News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Latta Highlights the Need for Federal Autonomous Vehicle Legislation

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Bob Latta (R-Bowling Green Ohio)

    Yesterday, Congressman Bob Latta (R-OH-5) joined the Commerce, Manufacturing and Trade Subcommittee hearing on motor vehicle safety, to discuss his commitment to advancing autonomous vehicle (AV) legislation. Congressman Latta spoke on the importance of the United States maintaining its global leadership in automotive innovation by advancing policies that support the deployment of next-generation technologies. Watch Congressman Latta’s full remarks HERE.   

    Even with vehicle safety standards improving over the years, traffic-related accidents have steadily been on the rise. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 39,345 people died in motor vehicle traffic accidents in 2024. In addition to improving safety on our roads, AVs have the potential to increase mobility for seniors and those who live with health challenges or disabilities. 

    Below is an excerpt from Congressman Latta’s remarks highlighting the need for federal AV legislation to improve safety:   

    “I think it’s important that we look at the number of highway deaths that we see in traffic and what was caused out there. About 94 percent of all the accidents being caused out there is because of driver error. I ride every year with the Ohio Highway Patrol, and when the troopers are out on the road, they can point out quickly people that are not paying attention. We want to make sure that we get this legislation passed… 

    “But one of the things I’ve said, it’s so important when we look at this is it’s always been safety first, safety last, safety always.” 

    Below is an excerpt of Jeff Farrah, CEO of the Autonomous Vehicle Industry Association, a witness at Thursday’s hearing:   

    “Congressman Latta, I want to first start by thanking you for all your efforts over the course of a very long time and acknowledge all the effort that you put into this issue. I don’t think there’s anyone in Congress who’s thought more deeply about this (automated vehicles) and been more committed to this. I know you’ve worked very closely with Congresswoman Dingell as well. I know she stepped out of the room here. We wanted to acknowledge her work as well… 

     “And we’re very pleased to work with you again to try and advance this legislation. I think that you’ve really articulated why this is so important from a safety perspective, from an economic perspective, and from a strategic competitor perspective. So I think that there’s a couple of things that we need to do here really to make sure that we are advancing public trust. And one of those is making sure that the federal government is speaking to vehicle design, construction, and performance issues, which only it can speak to uniformly. And that’s something that’s going to be married with a lot of the great efforts that have happened in a variety of US states, including in your state of Ohio…”  

    Congressman Latta is currently the co-chair of the Congressional Autonomous Vehicle Caucus; a bipartisan caucus aimed at educating Congress on how autonomous vehicle technology can improve the safety and accessibility of the nation’s roads. 

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: SBA Relief Still Available to Oregon Small Businesses and Private Nonprofits Affected by the Microwave Tower Fire

    Source: United States Small Business Administration

    SACRAMENTO, Calif. – The U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) is reminding eligible small businesses and nonprofit organizations in Oregon of the July 29, 2025 deadline to apply for low interest federal disaster loans to offset economic losses caused by the Microwave Tower Fire occurring July 22- Aug. 11, 2024.

    The disaster declaration covers the Oregon counties of Clackamas, Gilliam, Hood River, Jefferson, Marion, Sherman, Wasco and Wheeler as well as the Washington county of Klickitat.

    Under this declaration, SBA’s Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL) program is available to eligible small businesses, small agricultural cooperatives, nurseries and private nonprofit (PNP)organizations impacted by financial losses directly related to this disaster. The SBA is unable to provide disaster loans to agricultural producers, farmers, or ranchers, except for aquaculture enterprises.

    EIDLs are for working capital needs caused by the disaster and are available even if the business or PNP did not suffer any physical damage. They may be used to pay fixed debts, payroll, accounts payable, and other bills not paid due to the disaster.

    “SBA loans help eligible small businesses cover operating expenses after a disaster, which is crucial for their recovery,” said Chris Stallings, associate administrator of the Office of Disaster Recovery and Resilience at the SBA. “These loans not only help business owners get back on their feet but also play a key role in sustaining local economies in the aftermath of a disaster.”

    The loan amount can be up to $2 million with interest rates as low as 4% for small businesses and 3.25% for PNPs, with terms up to 30 years. Interest does not accrue, and payments are not due, until 12 months from the date of the first loan disbursement. The SBA sets loan amounts and terms based on each applicant’s financial condition.

    To apply online, visit sba.gov/disaster. Applicants may also call SBA’s Customer Service Center at (800) 659-2955 or email disastercustomerservice@sba.gov for more information on SBA disaster assistance. For people who are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability, please dial 7-1-1 to access telecommunications relay services.

    Submit completed loan applications to the SBA no later than July 29.

    ###

    About the U.S. Small Business Administration

    The U.S. Small Business Administration helps power the American dream of business ownership. As the only go-to resource and voice for small businesses backed by the strength of the federal government, the SBA empowers entrepreneurs and small business owners with the resources and support they need to start, grow, expand their businesses, or recover from a declared disaster. It delivers services through an extensive network of SBA field offices and partnerships with public and private organizations. To learn more, visit www.sba.gov.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Judge Kenneth A. Talley named district administrative judge for the District Court of Maryland in Calvert, Charles, and St. Mary’s counties

    Source: US State of Maryland

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
    June 27, 2025

    Government Relations and Public Affairs
    187 Harry S. Truman Parkway
    Annapolis, Maryland 21401

    Judge Kenneth A. Talley named district administrative judge for the District Court of Maryland in Calvert, Charles, and St. Mary’s counties

    ANNAPOLIS, Md. – District Court of Maryland Chief Judge John P. Morrissey, with the approval of Supreme Court of Maryland Chief Justice Matthew J. Fader, has named Charles County District Court Judge Kenneth A. Talley as the new administrative judge for District 4 (Calvert, Charles, and St. Mary’s counties). Judge Talley’s new role is effective August 1, 2025.

    Judge Talley succeeds District Administrative Judge Karen Christy Holt Chesser, who will step down from her administrative judge role in preparation for her retirement in 2026.

    “Judge Talley is an excellent jurist and choice as the new administrative judge for the District Court in Southern Maryland,” said Supreme Court of Maryland Chief Justice Matthew J. Fader. “I am confident that he will continue to be an effective leader in his district to provide fair, efficient, and effective justice for all.”

    District 4 Administrative Judge Kenneth A. Talley

    District administrative judges oversee the administration of the court and manage trial calendars to ensure the expeditious disposition of cases.

    “Judge Talley’s leadership in the District Court in Charles County for the past 16 years has prepared him to take on this new role,” said District Court of Maryland Chief Judge John P. Morrissey. “Administrative Judge Chesser has been an exemplary administrative Judge, has served her District well for the past 15 years, and will be available to manage the transition with Judge Talley.”   

    Judge Talley was appointed as an associate judge to the District Court in Charles County in May 2009 by then-Governor Martin O’Malley. 

    Judge Talley has served on the Judiciary’s Security and Post-COVID Judicial Operations Committees. Additionally, he served as a member of the Maryland Judiciary’s Judicial Council Equal Justice Committee from 2020 to 2022. 

    Judge Talley served as a law clerk for retired Judge Herman C. Dawson, Circuit Court for Prince George’s County, from 1998 to 1999, before starting his career as an attorney at Don Ansell & Associates, at which he worked from 1999 to 2000. He formerly served as an assistant public defender in Charles County from 2000 to 2005. Additionally, he served as a partner at Collins & Talley from 2005 to 2007, and as an assistant state’s attorney in Charles County from 2007 to 2009. 

    Judge Talley earned a Bachelor of Arts degree from the University of Maryland, College Park, in government and politics in 1990, and a juris doctorate from the University of Maryland School of Law in 1993. He is admitted to the Maryland Bar, and he is a member of the Maryland State Bar Association. He has been a member of the Charles County Bar Association since 2002, serving on its board of directors from 2004 to 2009, as treasurer, secretary, vice president, and president, and still served in the role as president upon his appointment to the bench in 2009. Judge Talley was also a member of the Association of Trial Lawyers of America.

    Judge Talley served from 2004 to 2007 as a community judge for the Charles County Teen Court Program, where he earned the Community Judge Appreciation Award for Outstanding Service. He also served as a member of the board of directors of Jude House, Inc. In 2001, Judge Talley earned the Assistant Public Defender of the Year Award, District IV.

    “It is a great honor and a privilege to be able to serve the citizens, staff, and judges of Southern Maryland, said Judge Kenneth A. Talley, Charles County District Court.”

    ###

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Landmark Legislation to Strengthen Cybersecurity

    Source: US State of New York

    overnor Kathy Hochul today signed into law S.7672A/A.6769A, a pivotal measure aimed at enhancing the cybersecurity and resilience of state and local government networks across New York. First announced in Governor Hochul’s 2025 State of the State, this legislation will improve the State’s ability to respond to threats, safeguard critical infrastructure and reduce statewide cybersecurity risks. Governor Hochul made the announcement today following a meeting with City, County, Town and Village officials from across the State to discuss current security efforts in response to the ongoing conflict in the Middle East.

    “My top priority as Governor is the security and safety of all New Yorkers, and with this legislation we’re strengthening our ability to respond to and ultimately prevent cyber threats all across our state,” Governor Hochul said. “As global conflicts escalate and cyber threats evolve, so must our response, and we are taking a whole of government approach in doing so. Requiring timely incident reporting and providing annual cybersecurity training for government employees will build a stronger digital shield for every community across the State and ensure they get the support they need when it matters most.”

    The legislation mandates that all municipal corporations and public authorities promptly report cybersecurity incidents and ransom payments to the New York State Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Services (DHSES), fortifying the statewide defense against digital threats. Under the new law, municipalities and public authorities are required to report cybersecurity incidents within 72 hours to DHSES and provide notice of payment of a ransom within 24 hours. The legislation also mandates annual cybersecurity awareness training for government employees across New York and sets data protection standards for State-maintained information systems.

    New York State Chief Cyber Officer Colin Ahern said, “The cyber threats that municipalities face have never been more numerous, more sophisticated, or more dangerous, and coordinated whole-of-government information sharing is more important than ever to tackle these threats. This legislation will enable New York State to build situational awareness of statewide cyber threat activity and create a comprehensive threat picture that can protect all New Yorkers. Ensuring that state and local government employees complete annual cybersecurity awareness training adds another line of cyber defense and empowers government employees statewide to recognize and respond to cyber threats.”

    State and local governments are on the front lines of a growing wave of cyberattacks that threaten essential services and public data. As attackers become more sophisticated and aggressive, municipalities face mounting risks with limited support and rapidly evolving threats. Recent ransomware incidents across the country have underscored the urgent need for coordinated, statewide action to help local agencies respond swiftly and protect the communities they serve. The 72-hour reporting requirement will give New York State critical visibility into threats, allowing for faster response, better coordination and damage limitation.

    State Senator Monica R. Martinez said, “Protecting the public is government’s most important responsibility, but attacks on critical infrastructure put essential services and the people who rely on them at risk. This bill gives municipalities the structure, support, and accountability they need to protect residents and taxpayers from prolonged disruption in the event of a cyberattack. I thank Governor Hochul and my colleagues in the Legislature for recognizing the cost of inaction and for advancing this important legislation.”

    State Senator Kristen Gonzalez said, “In our increasingly digital world, our data is constantly at risk. As emerging technologies make it easier for hackers to access our data, readiness isn’t just an option for our government; it’s our imperative. I thank the sponsor for introducing this bill and the Governor for signing it into law. It is a smart measure that will improve municipal cybersecurity posture and threat intelligence sharing within the state. I look forward to more legislation on cybersecurity being considered so we can make New York as technologically safe as possible.”

    Assemblymember Billy Jones said, “This piece of legislation is vital for our ever-changing technological state. The unique threats digital attackers pose to our municipalities requires a strong and direct response, and this bill will allow our local and state leaders to do just that. Cybersecurity is an increasingly important topic across all sectors of the state, and ensuring our government offices and agencies are able to respond to threats is critical.”

    Assemblymember Steve Otis said, “Since the August 2023 release of Governor Hochul’s NYS Cybersecurity Strategy, New York has steadily increased cybersecurity assistance to local governments. This important legislation continues that commitment by requiring prompt reporting of cyberattacks and ransom payments and cybersecurity training of government employees. Full knowledge of cyberattacks statewide will allow state cyber agencies to better advise local governments and school districts about the evolving threat environment. This new law is another example of Governor Hochul and the Legislature working together to expand our resilience to these threats.”

    New York State Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Services Commissioner Jackie Bray said, “As Governor Hochul says, our number one job is to keep New Yorkers safe. That includes protecting local governments from cyberattacks. This bill will ensure that all local governments and public authorities report cyberattacks soon after they occur so that our cyber security team has the information we need to respond to the ever-changing threat landscape.”

    New York State Chief Information Officer and Director of the Office of Information Technology Services Dru Rai said, “Training and awareness is a key component in enhancing New York’s statewide cybersecurity posture and creating an army of cyber warriors who can better shield their IT assets, safeguard sensitive data and protect all New Yorkers. Thanks to Governor Hochul’s strong leadership and historic cybersecurity investments, as well as our ongoing partnership with the Senate, Assembly and our local governments, New York State is better prepared than ever to take the fight to the enemy. Cyber threat actors will continue to change their tactics in an attempt to find even the slightest vulnerability, but as a State we will continue to adapt, evolve, educate and strengthen our overall defenses to aggressively and proactively meet this challenge.”

    New York Association of Towns Executive Director Christopher A Koetzle said, “Municipalities face ever-increasing and sophisticated cyber threats. I applaud the governor and the Legislature for helping to better protect our local governments across the state and giving them more tools to prepare for and respond to these growing threats. NYAOT has long stood in partnership with NYMIR in its mission of delivering cyber security training to each of our member towns and this bill will ensure that more towns make training a priority in the coming years.”

    New York State Association of Counties Executive Director Stephen J. Acquario said, “Almost everything that counties and local governments do today rely on some type of information technology system, and we know that these systems are under threat. This new law is designed to raise the baseline of understanding of cybersecurity for all local leaders and employees so we can all better defend the information systems and data we all rely on to operate government and serve residents. On behalf of the county governments of New York, we commend Governor Hochul for approving this legislation.”

    New York State Conference of Mayors Executive Director Barbara Van Epps said, “NYCOM applauds Governor Hochul and the State Legislature for making cybersecurity a top priority for New York. The enactment of this legislation marks a critical step forward in strengthening our collective defense against digital threats to the State and its local governments. By requiring prompt incident reporting, ransomware disclosures and annual cybersecurity training, the Governor is sending a clear message: cybersecurity is not just an IT issue — it’s a core public safety priority that demands coordination, vigilance and shared responsibility.”

    The enactment of S.7672A/A.6769A underscores New York State’s commitment to cybersecurity, setting a precedent for other states to follow in protecting both state and local critical infrastructure from cyber threats. Under Governor Hochul’s leadership, New York has led the nation in developing smart and effective cybersecurity policy — from nation-leading financial sector regulations to landmark legislation to protect New York’s energy grid from cyberattacks, and first-in-the-nation hospital cybersecurity regulations.

    These and other initiatives build on Governor Hochul’s previous actions and investments to build a more resilient, safer and secure digital environment for all New Yorkers. Following escalation of the conflict in the Middle East, Governor Hochul immediately convened the State’s top security personnel from counterintelligence, State Police and Homeland Security. In order to protect New York’s municipalities and cyber infrastructure, Governor Hochul has invested millions of dollars to harden local assets and ensure the protection of critical data that’s used to deliver services to New Yorkers.

    Over the last three years, Governor Hochul has also made foundational investments in New York’s cybersecurity by establishing the NYS Joint Security Operations Center (JSOC), operationalizing the statewide shared services program for counties and municipalities and expanding the State’s law enforcement cyber capabilities by growing the Computer Crimes Unit, Cyber Analysis Unit and Internet Crimes Against Children Center at the New York State Police.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Remarks by Acting Chairman Caroline D. Pham, 100 Impact Leaders Dinner and Annual Awards, Digital Assets Global Forum, UK House of Lords

    Source: US Commodity Futures Trading Commission

    Good evening, my lords, ladies and gentlemen. I would like to express my gratitude to Lord Taylor of Warwick and Dr. Lisa Cameron, as well as the Financial Club and the UK US Crypto Alliance, for this recognition at the Digital Assets Global Forum 100 Impact Leaders Dinner and Annual Awards and inviting me to provide remarks. Thank you also to Baroness Uddin and Lord Ranger, and especially to all the event staff at the House of Lords.
    It is a great honor to receive this year’s Legacy Award, and a great privilege to share my views regarding innovation and market structure in financial services. Tonight’s event is a testament to the strength and longevity of the close relationships among UK and U.S. institutions, and the special relationship between our two great Nations.
    Crypto and Digital Assets
    In April, Treasury Secretary Bessent and Chancellor Reeves discussed digital asset regulation and laid the groundwork for our governments to explore ways “to support the use and responsible growth of digital assets.”
    In the context of that discussion, I was pleased to learn that Chancellor Reeves acknowledged the importance of the UK-U.S. Financial Regulatory Working Group (FRWG), which I will discuss in a few minutes. Both the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and the UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) are members, and our agencies have partnered closely for decades.
    The UK Government has moved quickly on cryptoasset regulatory proposals, including the FCA’s public consultation on various papers and publication of an FCA Crypto Roadmap.
    So, I would like to highlight for you the CFTC’s swift progress on President Trump’s executive orders and policy agenda for digital assets.
    For both our Nations, this is the light at the end of a very long tunnel, the dawn of a new golden age for market innovation, and the culmination of years of hard work by both the public and private sectors.
    Responsible innovation and fair competition
    While UK regulators have recently gained a secondary mandate on competition, the CFTC has long had a dual mandate to promote responsible innovation and fair competition in our markets.
    Our dual mandate enshrines the simple truth that derivatives are financial instruments that are at the cutting edge of market innovation, and therefore our regulatory framework must be principles-based and flexible to adapt to new markets and new products.
    Let me tell you about my personal journey towards ensuring that the CFTC remains not only the first, but also at the forefront, of leadership on digital asset markets.
    The U.S. regulation of spot digital assets is a high priority for the CFTC because the largest digital asset markets are commodities.
    It is also a high priority for me because I have worked on crypto and digital assets initiatives for over 10 years—since 2013, when I was staff at the CFTC and the Bitcoin Foundation came to Washington, DC to engage with regulators on responsible innovation.
    That’s right—the crypto industry did not run away from regulation, they ran towards it, even in those early years, in hopes of finding a clear regulatory roadmap.
    At that time, we at the CFTC thought that Bitcoin was a commodity. Two years later, in 2015, the CFTC made this view known publicly, and has maintained this view ever since as this novel asset class has expanded to include more tokens.
    After my initial experience with crypto at the CFTC, I engaged on crypto again in the private sector.
    I worked on Citi’s digital asset strategy, including product development and strategic equity and venture capital investments, and I worked on transactions, partnerships, vendors, and new clients.
    I led digital assets global regulatory strategy and policy advocacy and initiatives to implement governance, risk, and control frameworks and compliance policies and procedures. That included leading global engagement in supervisory examinations of distributed ledger technology (DLT or blockchain) and digital assets by both U.S. and non-U.S. regulators—including the FCA.
    Based on my hands-on experience, when I became a CFTC Commissioner, I knew providing regulatory clarity for digital assets had to be a priority.
    I first proposed 10 fundamentals for responsible digital asset markets, which could be universally applied in any jurisdiction, in 2022. Then, I proposed a CFTC digital asset markets pilot program as a U.S. regulatory sandbox in 2023. I was gratified to be named to CoinDesk’s Most Influential 2023 list for these efforts.
    Last year, in 2024, the Digital Asset Markets Subcommittee of the CFTC’s Global Markets Advisory Committee (GMAC), which I sponsor, developed and made two recommendations to the Commission: (1) a U.S. digital asset taxonomy and (2) regulatory treatment of tokenized non-cash collateral.
    I want to thank the firms—many in this audience—from the largest banks and asset managers, to exchanges and clearinghouses, to crypto native startups, who have contributed to the GMAC’s efforts and graciously provided their time and resources to create a consensus view across both traditional and digital asset markets.
    These recommendations for industry standards reflect years of thoughtful, disciplined work from the actual builders in this space who are the industry leaders.
    It’s a common global solution that works for everyone, and also includes input from both international standard setters and non-U.S. regulatory authorities.
    A golden age for market innovation
    This year, in the Trump Administration’s first 100 days, the CFTC has taken decisive action to implement these prior proposals and promote a pro-innovation, pro-growth approach for digital assets.
    The CFTC is a member of the President’s Working Group on Digital Asset Markets, which is expected to release a report next month that will be the Administration’s crypto roadmap. We have been working closely with the U.S. Treasury Department, the SEC, and other agencies on this productive and fruitful effort.
    In February, I hosted a first-ever Crypto CEO Forum and participated in the groundbreaking White House Digital Assets Summit.
    The CFTC has withdrawn outdated staff advisories and released new guidance to improve regulatory clarity for American and other innovators and entrepreneurs in crypto and digital assets.
    We have had discussions on a digital asset markets pilot program and will soon participate as an observer in industry tokenization initiatives.
    And, the CFTC recently completed a public comment period on 24/7 trading and perpetual derivatives, two crypto market innovations that may have implications for other asset classes with sufficient liquidity. Perpetual derivatives have been trading live on CFTC-registered designated contract markets (DCMs) since April, and 24/7 trading has been live since May.
    The CFTC has provided technical assistance to Congress on various digital asset legislative proposals, including the CLARITY Act, and stands ready to carry out our mission if our jurisdiction is expanded. The future is bright.
    Looking ahead, the U.S. must have a durable and flexible approach to regulation that will keep up with continuing innovation and stand the test of time.
    Lessons learned
    I appreciate Lord Taylor’s remarks about learning from the past. I will share some lessons learned from my experience at the CFTC and in the private sector with implementing the Dodd-Frank Act, the last time the U.S. enacted legislation that dramatically reshaped market structure.
    The CFTC’s implementation of Dodd-Frank with our swaps regulations had far-reaching unintended consequences. Fifteen years later, the CFTC is still working to eliminate unworkable, overly burdensome requirements and resolve regulatory overreach that have significantly increased costs for all market participants with no meaningful benefits.
    There are two key lessons learned, and we must not repeat the mistakes of the past.
    Regulatory moat
    First, Dodd-Frank’s duplicative, costly, and unnecessary regulatory requirements that cost billions of dollars annually for registration, compliance, and reporting—in addition to enforcement penalties that have become a tax on doing business—have resulted in a regulatory moat that is a barrier to entry for smaller firms, startups, and entrepreneurs.
    This has led to anti-competitive effects and consolidation and concentration of market participants, because only the biggest firms can afford the overhead.
    Any mandate or issuance of new regulations by the CFTC should leverage our existing registration categories and compliance requirements to avoid piling on with another layer of overregulation that has no benefit to market integrity or customer protection.
    Market fragmentation
    Second, Dodd-Frank’s jurisdictional overreach and the CFTC’s initial approach to cross-border activity resulted in swaps market fragmentation. These effects were especially profound in London and New York, the most important trading hubs.
    A lack of harmonization based on principles of international comity, mutual recognition, and regulatory coherence led to fractured market liquidity that is less resilient to market shock or dislocation, increasing both market volatility and systemic risk.
    Market fragmentation also resulted in increased complexity and costs for international financial institutions and other market participants’ legal entity strategy, booking models, and other operational processes. Increasing complexity increases both financial and non-financial risks.
    Again, fifteen years later, the CFTC still has not completed implementing a substituted compliance regime across all CFTC swaps regulation.
    Most of the CFTC’s over 20 staff letters, advisories, or other guidance issued since January under my leadership as acting Chairman have been to fix remaining Dodd-Frank issues based on my experience as an operating executive.
    Because crypto and digital asset markets are borderless by design, it is imperative that the CFTC’s policy approach ensures that substituted compliance will be available from the start for entities that are properly registered in their home country jurisdictions that have comparable regulatory schemes, and that reciprocal mutual recognition for CFTC-registered entities is available as well.
    The close partnership between UK and U.S. authorities can help to achieve this regulatory coherence. By leveraging existing registration categories and cross-border substituted compliance or mutual recognition, the CFTC and our non-U.S. regulatory counterparts would not have to reinvent the wheel and further delay growth and progress for digital asset markets.
    Our current CFTC regulated entities could begin trading crypto on day one, and bring previously offshore activity back onshore to the U.S. with no negative impact to depth of market liquidity.
    Simplicity is the solution
    I have encouraged technology-neutral regulations that do not have to be continually rewritten to keep up with innovation, and activity-based regulations that do not require burdensome and costly entity-registration requirements that stifle competition by raising the gate to new entrants with less capital (namely, start-ups and entrepreneurs).
    It is critical that once further regulatory clarity is provided, including through interpretations and exemptions, that the CFTC is prepared to move quickly rather than waiting to complete the 4 to 5 year process to develop and adopt additional digital asset regulations, for the crypto and financial sector to then spend even more years to implement.
    The regulatory burn rate and the costs of missing out on market share are real.
    A simple approach that can be completed in 12 to 18 months is the fastest way to ensure that the U.S. is no longer left behind when it comes to promoting innovation and welcoming American entrepreneurs and companies to come back home.
    This is how we ensure U.S. competitiveness and that the U.S. leads the way in harnessing the potential of this new technology to create economic opportunities for all Americans.  This is how the U.S. becomes the crypto capital of the world.
    UK and U.S. Relationship
    In the FinTech and digital-assets space, the CFTC’s coordination with our UK counterparts has enabled us to navigate the rapidly changing landscape, mitigate risks, and advance responsible innovation. I especially want to recognize our close cooperation with the FCA in this regard.
    In 2018, the CFTC and the FCA signed a FinTech Innovation Arrangement wherein we each committed to collaborate and support innovative firms through our respective financial technology initiatives.
    CFTC staff members have also benefitted from participating with their UK peers and other regulatory partners in the Financial Innovation Partnership, which is a dialogue like the FRWG, designed to focus on facilitating our mutual engagement in financial innovation.
    In other areas of financial services oversight, we have a long and deep history of collaboration.
    These long-standing examples serve as a formidable blueprint for successful collaboration going forward regarding digital-assets, decentralized finance, and artificial intelligence (AI):

    In 1986, the CFTC and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) signed a memorandum of understanding with the UK Department of Trade and Industry, now succeeded by the FCA.

    In 1989, the CFTC included the UK among the first exemptions issued under Rule 30.10 (allowing UK firms to serve as futures brokers for U.S. customers on UK exchanges without having to register as brokers in the U.S.).   Many UK firms still avail themselves of this 30.10 relief.

    In 1991, we signed a memorandum of understanding amongst the CFTC, SEC, the then Department of Trade and Industry, and the Securities and Investments Board (the latter two succeeded by the FCA, the Prudential Regulation Authority, and the Bank of England) on mutual assistance and the exchange of information.

    In 2009, the CFTC and the Bank of England executed a memorandum of understanding on Central Counterparty Clearing House (CCP) supervision.

    In 2020, the CFTC revised that clearing memorandum of understanding with the Bank of England to reflect the cooperation and exchange of information in the supervision and oversight of CCPs that operate on a cross-border basis in the U.S. and UK.

    In the Spring of 2023, the CFTC and Bank of England announced a further strengthening of our commitment to close cooperation and mutual understandings on the supervision of CCPs.

    Later in 2023, the UK Parliament published its CCP equivalence decision for the CFTC. This was an important milestone in our mutual deferential approach to supervision because it highlights our strong cooperation and allows greater cross-border access for our regulated entities.

    Each of these achievements have been possible because we have a relationship based on trust and mutual respect.
    Since the financial crisis and global derivatives regulatory reform, the CFTC directly regulates the largest UK banks as swap dealers, and much hard work has gone into establishing a substituted compliance and mutual recognition regime. I’m pleased to have furthered these efforts under my chairmanship as well.
    The UK-U.S. Financial Regulatory Working Group
    During the most recent FRWG meeting, representatives of our finance ministries, markets regulators, and prudential authorities discussed the strong current of innovation evident in our jurisdictions as well as the means to collaborate on a foundational framework in the areas of digital-assets and AI.
    Our respective delegations provided updates on proposed legislation to regulate digital assets, including stablecoin. UK participants also noted that you have updated your Digital Securities Sandbox and are building on recent discussions between the Chancellor and the U.S. Treasury Secretary.
    Importantly, the FRWG also discussed exploring potential opportunities to support cross-border innovation. Participants emphasized the importance of effective regulation in promoting economic growth while also addressing risks and continued bilateral and international engagement within the sector and amongst authorities.
    In that regard, FRWG representatives also exchanged views on their respective approaches to AI and both current and future AI use cases within financial services. U.S. and UK authorities discussed means to work together, including as appropriate through international standard-setting and coordination institutions, to realize the potential of this technology and address the risks of AI in financial services.
    Conclusion
    During my chairmanship and as a commissioner, I have tirelessly advocated for a level playing field for global businesses and access to markets. Relationships—especially special ones like ours, the UK and the U.S.—make this possible.
    Through my work with the CFTC’s GMAC and engagement with international standard-setters like the Financial Stability Board (FSB), Bank for International Settlements (BIS) and the Basel Committee for Banking Supervision (BCBS), the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO), and the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), and my bilateral relationships with nearly two dozen of the CFTC’s regulatory counterparts around the world, I believe that we can achieve shared prosperity through economic growth and the engine of capital markets.
    As our Nations continue to forge ahead with our pro-innovation agendas through our multiple regulatory initiatives, our markets will be well-served by our continued cooperation.
    Thank you.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Remarks by Acting Chairman Caroline D. Pham, 100 Impact Leaders Dinner and Annual Awards, Digital Assets Global Forum, UK House of Lords

    Source: US Commodity Futures Trading Commission

    Good evening, my lords, ladies and gentlemen. I would like to express my gratitude to Lord Taylor of Warwick and Dr. Lisa Cameron, as well as the Financial Club and the UK US Crypto Alliance, for this recognition at the Digital Assets Global Forum 100 Impact Leaders Dinner and Annual Awards and inviting me to provide remarks. Thank you also to Baroness Uddin and Lord Ranger, and especially to all the event staff at the House of Lords.
    It is a great honor to receive this year’s Legacy Award, and a great privilege to share my views regarding innovation and market structure in financial services. Tonight’s event is a testament to the strength and longevity of the close relationships among UK and U.S. institutions, and the special relationship between our two great Nations.
    Crypto and Digital Assets
    In April, Treasury Secretary Bessent and Chancellor Reeves discussed digital asset regulation and laid the groundwork for our governments to explore ways “to support the use and responsible growth of digital assets.”
    In the context of that discussion, I was pleased to learn that Chancellor Reeves acknowledged the importance of the UK-U.S. Financial Regulatory Working Group (FRWG), which I will discuss in a few minutes. Both the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and the UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) are members, and our agencies have partnered closely for decades.
    The UK Government has moved quickly on cryptoasset regulatory proposals, including the FCA’s public consultation on various papers and publication of an FCA Crypto Roadmap.
    So, I would like to highlight for you the CFTC’s swift progress on President Trump’s executive orders and policy agenda for digital assets.
    For both our Nations, this is the light at the end of a very long tunnel, the dawn of a new golden age for market innovation, and the culmination of years of hard work by both the public and private sectors.
    Responsible innovation and fair competition
    While UK regulators have recently gained a secondary mandate on competition, the CFTC has long had a dual mandate to promote responsible innovation and fair competition in our markets.
    Our dual mandate enshrines the simple truth that derivatives are financial instruments that are at the cutting edge of market innovation, and therefore our regulatory framework must be principles-based and flexible to adapt to new markets and new products.
    Let me tell you about my personal journey towards ensuring that the CFTC remains not only the first, but also at the forefront, of leadership on digital asset markets.
    The U.S. regulation of spot digital assets is a high priority for the CFTC because the largest digital asset markets are commodities.
    It is also a high priority for me because I have worked on crypto and digital assets initiatives for over 10 years—since 2013, when I was staff at the CFTC and the Bitcoin Foundation came to Washington, DC to engage with regulators on responsible innovation.
    That’s right—the crypto industry did not run away from regulation, they ran towards it, even in those early years, in hopes of finding a clear regulatory roadmap.
    At that time, we at the CFTC thought that Bitcoin was a commodity. Two years later, in 2015, the CFTC made this view known publicly, and has maintained this view ever since as this novel asset class has expanded to include more tokens.
    After my initial experience with crypto at the CFTC, I engaged on crypto again in the private sector.
    I worked on Citi’s digital asset strategy, including product development and strategic equity and venture capital investments, and I worked on transactions, partnerships, vendors, and new clients.
    I led digital assets global regulatory strategy and policy advocacy and initiatives to implement governance, risk, and control frameworks and compliance policies and procedures. That included leading global engagement in supervisory examinations of distributed ledger technology (DLT or blockchain) and digital assets by both U.S. and non-U.S. regulators—including the FCA.
    Based on my hands-on experience, when I became a CFTC Commissioner, I knew providing regulatory clarity for digital assets had to be a priority.
    I first proposed 10 fundamentals for responsible digital asset markets, which could be universally applied in any jurisdiction, in 2022. Then, I proposed a CFTC digital asset markets pilot program as a U.S. regulatory sandbox in 2023. I was gratified to be named to CoinDesk’s Most Influential 2023 list for these efforts.
    Last year, in 2024, the Digital Asset Markets Subcommittee of the CFTC’s Global Markets Advisory Committee (GMAC), which I sponsor, developed and made two recommendations to the Commission: (1) a U.S. digital asset taxonomy and (2) regulatory treatment of tokenized non-cash collateral.
    I want to thank the firms—many in this audience—from the largest banks and asset managers, to exchanges and clearinghouses, to crypto native startups, who have contributed to the GMAC’s efforts and graciously provided their time and resources to create a consensus view across both traditional and digital asset markets.
    These recommendations for industry standards reflect years of thoughtful, disciplined work from the actual builders in this space who are the industry leaders.
    It’s a common global solution that works for everyone, and also includes input from both international standard setters and non-U.S. regulatory authorities.
    A golden age for market innovation
    This year, in the Trump Administration’s first 100 days, the CFTC has taken decisive action to implement these prior proposals and promote a pro-innovation, pro-growth approach for digital assets.
    The CFTC is a member of the President’s Working Group on Digital Asset Markets, which is expected to release a report next month that will be the Administration’s crypto roadmap. We have been working closely with the U.S. Treasury Department, the SEC, and other agencies on this productive and fruitful effort.
    In February, I hosted a first-ever Crypto CEO Forum and participated in the groundbreaking White House Digital Assets Summit.
    The CFTC has withdrawn outdated staff advisories and released new guidance to improve regulatory clarity for American and other innovators and entrepreneurs in crypto and digital assets.
    We have had discussions on a digital asset markets pilot program and will soon participate as an observer in industry tokenization initiatives.
    And, the CFTC recently completed a public comment period on 24/7 trading and perpetual derivatives, two crypto market innovations that may have implications for other asset classes with sufficient liquidity. Perpetual derivatives have been trading live on CFTC-registered designated contract markets (DCMs) since April, and 24/7 trading has been live since May.
    The CFTC has provided technical assistance to Congress on various digital asset legislative proposals, including the CLARITY Act, and stands ready to carry out our mission if our jurisdiction is expanded. The future is bright.
    Looking ahead, the U.S. must have a durable and flexible approach to regulation that will keep up with continuing innovation and stand the test of time.
    Lessons learned
    I appreciate Lord Taylor’s remarks about learning from the past. I will share some lessons learned from my experience at the CFTC and in the private sector with implementing the Dodd-Frank Act, the last time the U.S. enacted legislation that dramatically reshaped market structure.
    The CFTC’s implementation of Dodd-Frank with our swaps regulations had far-reaching unintended consequences. Fifteen years later, the CFTC is still working to eliminate unworkable, overly burdensome requirements and resolve regulatory overreach that have significantly increased costs for all market participants with no meaningful benefits.
    There are two key lessons learned, and we must not repeat the mistakes of the past.
    Regulatory moat
    First, Dodd-Frank’s duplicative, costly, and unnecessary regulatory requirements that cost billions of dollars annually for registration, compliance, and reporting—in addition to enforcement penalties that have become a tax on doing business—have resulted in a regulatory moat that is a barrier to entry for smaller firms, startups, and entrepreneurs.
    This has led to anti-competitive effects and consolidation and concentration of market participants, because only the biggest firms can afford the overhead.
    Any mandate or issuance of new regulations by the CFTC should leverage our existing registration categories and compliance requirements to avoid piling on with another layer of overregulation that has no benefit to market integrity or customer protection.
    Market fragmentation
    Second, Dodd-Frank’s jurisdictional overreach and the CFTC’s initial approach to cross-border activity resulted in swaps market fragmentation. These effects were especially profound in London and New York, the most important trading hubs.
    A lack of harmonization based on principles of international comity, mutual recognition, and regulatory coherence led to fractured market liquidity that is less resilient to market shock or dislocation, increasing both market volatility and systemic risk.
    Market fragmentation also resulted in increased complexity and costs for international financial institutions and other market participants’ legal entity strategy, booking models, and other operational processes. Increasing complexity increases both financial and non-financial risks.
    Again, fifteen years later, the CFTC still has not completed implementing a substituted compliance regime across all CFTC swaps regulation.
    Most of the CFTC’s over 20 staff letters, advisories, or other guidance issued since January under my leadership as acting Chairman have been to fix remaining Dodd-Frank issues based on my experience as an operating executive.
    Because crypto and digital asset markets are borderless by design, it is imperative that the CFTC’s policy approach ensures that substituted compliance will be available from the start for entities that are properly registered in their home country jurisdictions that have comparable regulatory schemes, and that reciprocal mutual recognition for CFTC-registered entities is available as well.
    The close partnership between UK and U.S. authorities can help to achieve this regulatory coherence. By leveraging existing registration categories and cross-border substituted compliance or mutual recognition, the CFTC and our non-U.S. regulatory counterparts would not have to reinvent the wheel and further delay growth and progress for digital asset markets.
    Our current CFTC regulated entities could begin trading crypto on day one, and bring previously offshore activity back onshore to the U.S. with no negative impact to depth of market liquidity.
    Simplicity is the solution
    I have encouraged technology-neutral regulations that do not have to be continually rewritten to keep up with innovation, and activity-based regulations that do not require burdensome and costly entity-registration requirements that stifle competition by raising the gate to new entrants with less capital (namely, start-ups and entrepreneurs).
    It is critical that once further regulatory clarity is provided, including through interpretations and exemptions, that the CFTC is prepared to move quickly rather than waiting to complete the 4 to 5 year process to develop and adopt additional digital asset regulations, for the crypto and financial sector to then spend even more years to implement.
    The regulatory burn rate and the costs of missing out on market share are real.
    A simple approach that can be completed in 12 to 18 months is the fastest way to ensure that the U.S. is no longer left behind when it comes to promoting innovation and welcoming American entrepreneurs and companies to come back home.
    This is how we ensure U.S. competitiveness and that the U.S. leads the way in harnessing the potential of this new technology to create economic opportunities for all Americans.  This is how the U.S. becomes the crypto capital of the world.
    UK and U.S. Relationship
    In the FinTech and digital-assets space, the CFTC’s coordination with our UK counterparts has enabled us to navigate the rapidly changing landscape, mitigate risks, and advance responsible innovation. I especially want to recognize our close cooperation with the FCA in this regard.
    In 2018, the CFTC and the FCA signed a FinTech Innovation Arrangement wherein we each committed to collaborate and support innovative firms through our respective financial technology initiatives.
    CFTC staff members have also benefitted from participating with their UK peers and other regulatory partners in the Financial Innovation Partnership, which is a dialogue like the FRWG, designed to focus on facilitating our mutual engagement in financial innovation.
    In other areas of financial services oversight, we have a long and deep history of collaboration.
    These long-standing examples serve as a formidable blueprint for successful collaboration going forward regarding digital-assets, decentralized finance, and artificial intelligence (AI):

    In 1986, the CFTC and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) signed a memorandum of understanding with the UK Department of Trade and Industry, now succeeded by the FCA.

    In 1989, the CFTC included the UK among the first exemptions issued under Rule 30.10 (allowing UK firms to serve as futures brokers for U.S. customers on UK exchanges without having to register as brokers in the U.S.).   Many UK firms still avail themselves of this 30.10 relief.

    In 1991, we signed a memorandum of understanding amongst the CFTC, SEC, the then Department of Trade and Industry, and the Securities and Investments Board (the latter two succeeded by the FCA, the Prudential Regulation Authority, and the Bank of England) on mutual assistance and the exchange of information.

    In 2009, the CFTC and the Bank of England executed a memorandum of understanding on Central Counterparty Clearing House (CCP) supervision.

    In 2020, the CFTC revised that clearing memorandum of understanding with the Bank of England to reflect the cooperation and exchange of information in the supervision and oversight of CCPs that operate on a cross-border basis in the U.S. and UK.

    In the Spring of 2023, the CFTC and Bank of England announced a further strengthening of our commitment to close cooperation and mutual understandings on the supervision of CCPs.

    Later in 2023, the UK Parliament published its CCP equivalence decision for the CFTC. This was an important milestone in our mutual deferential approach to supervision because it highlights our strong cooperation and allows greater cross-border access for our regulated entities.

    Each of these achievements have been possible because we have a relationship based on trust and mutual respect.
    Since the financial crisis and global derivatives regulatory reform, the CFTC directly regulates the largest UK banks as swap dealers, and much hard work has gone into establishing a substituted compliance and mutual recognition regime. I’m pleased to have furthered these efforts under my chairmanship as well.
    The UK-U.S. Financial Regulatory Working Group
    During the most recent FRWG meeting, representatives of our finance ministries, markets regulators, and prudential authorities discussed the strong current of innovation evident in our jurisdictions as well as the means to collaborate on a foundational framework in the areas of digital-assets and AI.
    Our respective delegations provided updates on proposed legislation to regulate digital assets, including stablecoin. UK participants also noted that you have updated your Digital Securities Sandbox and are building on recent discussions between the Chancellor and the U.S. Treasury Secretary.
    Importantly, the FRWG also discussed exploring potential opportunities to support cross-border innovation. Participants emphasized the importance of effective regulation in promoting economic growth while also addressing risks and continued bilateral and international engagement within the sector and amongst authorities.
    In that regard, FRWG representatives also exchanged views on their respective approaches to AI and both current and future AI use cases within financial services. U.S. and UK authorities discussed means to work together, including as appropriate through international standard-setting and coordination institutions, to realize the potential of this technology and address the risks of AI in financial services.
    Conclusion
    During my chairmanship and as a commissioner, I have tirelessly advocated for a level playing field for global businesses and access to markets. Relationships—especially special ones like ours, the UK and the U.S.—make this possible.
    Through my work with the CFTC’s GMAC and engagement with international standard-setters like the Financial Stability Board (FSB), Bank for International Settlements (BIS) and the Basel Committee for Banking Supervision (BCBS), the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO), and the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), and my bilateral relationships with nearly two dozen of the CFTC’s regulatory counterparts around the world, I believe that we can achieve shared prosperity through economic growth and the engine of capital markets.
    As our Nations continue to forge ahead with our pro-innovation agendas through our multiple regulatory initiatives, our markets will be well-served by our continued cooperation.
    Thank you.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Congressman Auchincloss questions Kennedy on the corruption of Trump Administration healthcare officials

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Representative Jake Auchincloss (Massachusetts, 4)

    June 24, 2025

    Washington, D.C. — Today, Congressman Jake Auchincloss (D-MA) questioned Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. about conflicts of interest stemming from the Trump Administration’s use of special government employees who still run and own their own health care companies. Earlier this month, Auchincloss sent letters calling on the boards of health companies True Medicine (TrueMed) and Main Street Health to provide information about conflicts of interest regarding their founders’ roles as special government employees overseeing health policy for the Trump administration: Calley Means of TrueMed, and Brad Smith of Main Street Health.

    Mr. Means currently serves as a White House Advisor and as a Special Government Employee detailed to Secretary Kennedy. As a leading policy-maker behind the Trump Administration’s “Make America Healthy Again” (MAHA) initiative, Mr. Means has significant influence in both regulation and legislation. Mr. Means’ TrueMed creates partnerships with businesses to sell health and wellness products, many of which are not FDA-regulated. TrueMed offers “letters of medical necessity” (LMNs) that enable patients to use pre-tax dollars from their Health Savings Accounts (HSA) to purchase these products. The Executive Order establishing the MAHA commission ordered health agencies to promote this application of HSAs, ultimately suggesting increased revenue for companies like TrueMed. The ‘One Big, Beautiful Bill’ also promotes the use of HSAs. 

    Mr. Smith served as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) at the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) until his reported departure on May 29, 2025. In this position, Mr. Smith was reportedly the primary official responsible for planning and implementing the major reduction-in-force (RIF) at HHS. Mr. Smith’s Main Street Health’s biggest investors are regulated by or transact with the Center for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS), including the largest Medicare Advantage Organizations (MAOs): UnitedHealthcare, Centene, CVS Health Ventures, Elevance, and Humana. These MAOs benefited from the Administration’s reduction in oversight and increase in reimbursement, as well as from Mr. Smith’s ability to win favor with CMS by protecting personnel from RIFs. 

    As Special Government Employees, neither Mr. Means nor Mr. Smith were required to recuse themselves from their private business interests or obtain ethics waivers. Please find below portions of Auchincloss’ questioning of Secretary Kennedy: 

    Auchincloss: Good afternoon, Secretary. You’ve emphasized throughout your career concerns about corruption and conflicts of interest in health care, yes? 

    Secretary Kennedy: About corruption and health care? 

    Rep. Auchincloss: Yes.

    Secretary Kennedy. Yeah. 

    Rep. Auchincloss: And you’ve pledged during your confirmation hearing and then again today, quote. Radical transparency, yes? 

    Secretary Kennedy. Yes.

    Rep. Auchincloss: And you explained to my colleague from New York that you divested yourself, yes?

    Secretary Kennedy. Yes. 

    Rep. Auchincloss:: And you fired the 17 members of ACIP because you think they have conflicts of interest? 

    Secretary Kennedy: Yes. 

    Rep. Auchincloss:: And do you think that everybody within Health and Human Services at a senior level should hold themselves to a standard of radical transparency and divestment? 

    Secretary Kennedy: Well, I’m going to hold them to that standard but–

    Rep. Auchincloss: So not everybody should hold themselves to a standard…?

    Secretary Kennedy. Well, everybody, and OGE makes them all divest. 

    Rep. Auchincloss:: So, everybody should divest and everybody should be radically transparent–who works for you? 

    Secretary Kennedy: Yes. 

    Rep. Auchincloss: Yes. And, does that include people who have involvement in Health and Human Services policymaking, even if they’re not in your department, would you want them to be radically transparent as well? 

    Secretary Kennedy: I don’t have any control over anybody except those in my department.

    Rep Auchincloss: Well, I think you do. Let’s talk, though, about how radically transparent you have been to date, because I want to ensure for the American public that they’re getting what you pledged. Mr. Calley Means is a Special Government Employee. He’s also a White House adviser, you know him well, he actually introduced you to Donald Trump. And he’s the founder and the owner of TrueMed.

    Now, TrueMed is a company that sells saunas and supplements, and maybe medical devices that you describe, to people using pre-tax dollars. And he has described his mission as routing federal funds away from health insurance programs towards these Health Savings Accounts. 

    Now, Mr. Means has tremendous influence over Medicare and Medicaid. Based on the executive order on Making America Healthy Again and the One Big Beautiful Bill, which both call for the expansion of HSA usage for these wellness and supplement products – so that’s a direct revenue stream for his company while he’s working in the government.”

    Please find the full video of Rep. Auchincloss’ exchange with Secretary Kennedy on Mr. Smith and Mr. Means here.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Congressman Auchincloss questions Kennedy on the corruption of Trump Administration healthcare officials

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Representative Jake Auchincloss (Massachusetts, 4)

    June 24, 2025

    Washington, D.C. — Today, Congressman Jake Auchincloss (D-MA) questioned Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. about conflicts of interest stemming from the Trump Administration’s use of special government employees who still run and own their own health care companies. Earlier this month, Auchincloss sent letters calling on the boards of health companies True Medicine (TrueMed) and Main Street Health to provide information about conflicts of interest regarding their founders’ roles as special government employees overseeing health policy for the Trump administration: Calley Means of TrueMed, and Brad Smith of Main Street Health.

    Mr. Means currently serves as a White House Advisor and as a Special Government Employee detailed to Secretary Kennedy. As a leading policy-maker behind the Trump Administration’s “Make America Healthy Again” (MAHA) initiative, Mr. Means has significant influence in both regulation and legislation. Mr. Means’ TrueMed creates partnerships with businesses to sell health and wellness products, many of which are not FDA-regulated. TrueMed offers “letters of medical necessity” (LMNs) that enable patients to use pre-tax dollars from their Health Savings Accounts (HSA) to purchase these products. The Executive Order establishing the MAHA commission ordered health agencies to promote this application of HSAs, ultimately suggesting increased revenue for companies like TrueMed. The ‘One Big, Beautiful Bill’ also promotes the use of HSAs. 

    Mr. Smith served as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) at the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) until his reported departure on May 29, 2025. In this position, Mr. Smith was reportedly the primary official responsible for planning and implementing the major reduction-in-force (RIF) at HHS. Mr. Smith’s Main Street Health’s biggest investors are regulated by or transact with the Center for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS), including the largest Medicare Advantage Organizations (MAOs): UnitedHealthcare, Centene, CVS Health Ventures, Elevance, and Humana. These MAOs benefited from the Administration’s reduction in oversight and increase in reimbursement, as well as from Mr. Smith’s ability to win favor with CMS by protecting personnel from RIFs. 

    As Special Government Employees, neither Mr. Means nor Mr. Smith were required to recuse themselves from their private business interests or obtain ethics waivers. Please find below portions of Auchincloss’ questioning of Secretary Kennedy: 

    Auchincloss: Good afternoon, Secretary. You’ve emphasized throughout your career concerns about corruption and conflicts of interest in health care, yes? 

    Secretary Kennedy: About corruption and health care? 

    Rep. Auchincloss: Yes.

    Secretary Kennedy. Yeah. 

    Rep. Auchincloss: And you’ve pledged during your confirmation hearing and then again today, quote. Radical transparency, yes? 

    Secretary Kennedy. Yes.

    Rep. Auchincloss: And you explained to my colleague from New York that you divested yourself, yes?

    Secretary Kennedy. Yes. 

    Rep. Auchincloss:: And you fired the 17 members of ACIP because you think they have conflicts of interest? 

    Secretary Kennedy: Yes. 

    Rep. Auchincloss:: And do you think that everybody within Health and Human Services at a senior level should hold themselves to a standard of radical transparency and divestment? 

    Secretary Kennedy: Well, I’m going to hold them to that standard but–

    Rep. Auchincloss: So not everybody should hold themselves to a standard…?

    Secretary Kennedy. Well, everybody, and OGE makes them all divest. 

    Rep. Auchincloss:: So, everybody should divest and everybody should be radically transparent–who works for you? 

    Secretary Kennedy: Yes. 

    Rep. Auchincloss: Yes. And, does that include people who have involvement in Health and Human Services policymaking, even if they’re not in your department, would you want them to be radically transparent as well? 

    Secretary Kennedy: I don’t have any control over anybody except those in my department.

    Rep Auchincloss: Well, I think you do. Let’s talk, though, about how radically transparent you have been to date, because I want to ensure for the American public that they’re getting what you pledged. Mr. Calley Means is a Special Government Employee. He’s also a White House adviser, you know him well, he actually introduced you to Donald Trump. And he’s the founder and the owner of TrueMed.

    Now, TrueMed is a company that sells saunas and supplements, and maybe medical devices that you describe, to people using pre-tax dollars. And he has described his mission as routing federal funds away from health insurance programs towards these Health Savings Accounts. 

    Now, Mr. Means has tremendous influence over Medicare and Medicaid. Based on the executive order on Making America Healthy Again and the One Big Beautiful Bill, which both call for the expansion of HSA usage for these wellness and supplement products – so that’s a direct revenue stream for his company while he’s working in the government.”

    Please find the full video of Rep. Auchincloss’ exchange with Secretary Kennedy on Mr. Smith and Mr. Means here.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Senator Coons statement on Trump v. CASA, Inc.

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Delaware Christopher Coons

    WASHINGTON – U.S. Senator Chris Coons (D-Del.) issued the following statement in response to the Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v. CASA, Inc., which sided with the Trump administration’s request to limit universal injunctions issued by federal courts:

    “The Constitution created three branches of government with equal power: the courts, Congress, and the president. Today, the Supreme Court made clear that one branch – the executive – has free reign to do what it wishes without meaningful checks or review.

    “The Court’s ruling will only embolden President Trump and his illegal, dangerous dismantling of our federal government. It will create an unworkable patchwork of laws that shift depending on who you are or what state you’re in. It means courts will be flooded with case after case about the exact same thing – slowing our legal system and delaying justice for everyone. How will that work for those too poor to hire a lawyer? For children? For working parents? 

    “Barring further intervention by the Court, next month there will be children who will be citizens if they are born in Delaware, but if born in another state, might not be. This is as wrong as it is cruel. The Court has unleashed chaos and confusion. Children, their families, and our nation will pay the price.”

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Senator Coons statement on Trump v. CASA, Inc.

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Delaware Christopher Coons

    WASHINGTON – U.S. Senator Chris Coons (D-Del.) issued the following statement in response to the Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v. CASA, Inc., which sided with the Trump administration’s request to limit universal injunctions issued by federal courts:

    “The Constitution created three branches of government with equal power: the courts, Congress, and the president. Today, the Supreme Court made clear that one branch – the executive – has free reign to do what it wishes without meaningful checks or review.

    “The Court’s ruling will only embolden President Trump and his illegal, dangerous dismantling of our federal government. It will create an unworkable patchwork of laws that shift depending on who you are or what state you’re in. It means courts will be flooded with case after case about the exact same thing – slowing our legal system and delaying justice for everyone. How will that work for those too poor to hire a lawyer? For children? For working parents? 

    “Barring further intervention by the Court, next month there will be children who will be citizens if they are born in Delaware, but if born in another state, might not be. This is as wrong as it is cruel. The Court has unleashed chaos and confusion. Children, their families, and our nation will pay the price.”

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Security: DHS Terminates Haiti TPS, Encourages Haitians to Obtain Lawful Status

    Source: US Department of Homeland Security

    WASHINGTON – Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem today announced the termination of Temporary Protected Status for Haiti. The TPS designation for the country expires on Aug. 3, 2025, and the termination will be effective on Tuesday, September 2, 2025. 

    At least 60 days before a TPS designation expires, the Secretary, after consultation with appropriate U.S. government agencies, is required to review the conditions in a country designated for TPS to determine whether the conditions supporting the designation continue to be met, and if so, how long to extend the designation.  

    “This decision restores integrity in our immigration system and ensures that Temporary Protective Status is actually temporary,” said a DHS spokesperson.The environmental situation in Haiti has improved enough that it is safe for Haitian citizens to return home. We encourage these individuals to take advantage of the Department’s resources in returning to Haiti, which can be arranged through the CBP Home app. Haitian nationals may pursue lawful status through other immigration benefit requests, if eligible.”

    After conferring with interagency partners, Secretary Noem determined that conditions in Haiti no longer meet the TPS statutory requirements. The Secretary’s decision was based on a U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services review of the conditions in Haiti and in consultation with the Department of State. The Secretary determined that, overall, country conditions have improved to the point where Haitians can return home in safety. She further determined that permitting Haitian nationals to remain temporarily in the United States is contrary to the national interest of the United States. Haitian nationals returning home are encouraged to use the U.S. Customs and Border Protection CBP Home app to report their departure from the United States.

    ###

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Security: DHS and DOJ Announce Streamlined Process for Fining Illegal Aliens

    Source: US Department of Homeland Security

    The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announced a new joint federal rule with the Department of Justice (DOJ) that will make it easier and more efficient to fine illegal aliens.

    The current process requires giving illegal aliens 30 days’ notice of the intent to fine them before a fine is issued. This new rule will eliminate the 30-day notice period, authorize DHS immigration officers to send fines to illegal aliens by regular mail, and shorten the process that applies if illegal aliens contest their fines.

    “The law doesn’t enforce itself; there must be consequences for breaking it.” said Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin. “President Trump and Secretary Noem are standing up for law and order and making our government more effective and efficient at enforcing the American people’s immigration laws. Financial penalties like these are just one more reason why illegal aliens should use CBP Home to self-deport now before it’s too late.”

    The new process will be applied to:

    • Aliens who enter the United States illegally
    • Aliens who ignore removal orders or delay their removal
    • Aliens who do not honor agreements to comply with judges’ voluntary departure orders

    Fines include:

    • $100 to $500 per unlawful entry or attempted entry
    • $1,992 to $9,970 for failure to honor a voluntary departure order
    • Up to $998 per day for willfully failing to comply with a removal order

    Fines such as these were never issued by DHS prior to President Trump’s first term in office. However, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) stopped issuing them when President Biden took office. Shortly after President Trump returned to office, ICE started issuing failure-to-depart fines again as of June 13, 2025, nearly 10,000 fine notices have been issued by ICE

    Aliens who self-deport through the CBP Home App will receive forgiveness of any civil fines or penalties for failing to depart the United States. All illegal aliens are encouraged to start their CBP Home self-deportation process immediately.

    ###

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Canada: Governments of Canada and Saskatchewan Provide Drought Support with the Doubled Low Yield Appraisal

    Source: Government of Canada regional news

    Released on June 27, 2025

    Today, federal Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food Heath MacDonald and Saskatchewan Minister of Agriculture Daryl Harrison announced the Saskatchewan Crop Insurance Corporation (SCIC) is implementing measures to offer support to producers facing this year’s challenging dry conditions. SCIC is implementing the double low yield appraisal process, encouraging acres of low-yielding eligible crops to be diverted to make additional feed available to graze, bale or silage. 

    “I’ve spoken with livestock and crop producers in Saskatchewan who are worried about the impact that dry conditions could have this year,” MacDonald said. “Changing the yield threshold will give them some breathing room, so they can make the best decisions for their operations.”

    “In multiple areas throughout the province, our livestock producers are facing challenges from this year’s dry conditions,” Harrison said. “There is a need to quickly adapt to best support producers’ timely, on-farm decisions. In 2021 and 2023, this same initiative was successfully implemented, resulting in over half a million acres of additional low yield crop redirected to feed. Once again, livestock producers are encouraged to work directly with neighbouring crop producers to access additional feed.”

    When crops are severely damaged and the appraised yield falls below an established threshold level, the yield is reduced to zero for the Crop Insurance claim. SCIC is doubling the low yield appraisal threshold values, allowing customers to salvage their eligible crops as feed, without negatively impacting future individual coverage. Prior to compensation, all qualifying acres for double low yield appraisals must be diverted to livestock feed. They cannot be left to harvest. Prior to putting damaged crops to an approved alternate use, producers should contact their local SCIC office.

    “This announcement is welcome news for our livestock producers,” SARM President Bill Huber said. “As in past years, it will help address feed shortages so many ranchers are experiencing. Timely support like this is critical to ensuring the sustainability of the sector in this province.”

    “Many cattle producers throughout the province are facing potential feed shortages,” Saskatchewan Cattle Association Chair Chad Ross said. “The recent rains may help with some of the later seeded crops and possible pasture rebound in some areas. Unfortunately, the hay crop was already burnt off in several places. Writing off some crops through doubling the low yield threshold will provide cattle producers an option for feeding their animals they didn’t previously have. The SCA thanks Ministers Harrison and MacDonald, along with the governments for moving quickly on this.”

    “We appreciate governments recognizing and meeting the need to support access to feed,” Saskatchewan Stock Growers Association President Jeff Yorga said. “There are producers struggling with drought conditions. They are assessing and adjusting crop and feed requirements. This action taken helps our producers make those important decisions in a timely fashion. As we move forward, I strongly encourage producers to directly connect with each other to coordinate access to any additional feed made available through this change.”

    “Swift action from government has provided a vital lifeline to many Saskatchewan farmers and ranchers amid this year’s early challenges,” APAS President Bill Prybylski said. “The quick adjustment of support measures reflects a strong commitment to agriculture and sets a high standard for proactive, responsive risk management programming. Producers across the province feel heard, supported and valued.”

    AgriStability can provide support to producers for production losses and increased expenses resulting from dry conditions. In most cases, the additional expense a producer incurs to acquire additional feed for their livestock is an eligible expense through the AgriStability Program. The deadline for producers to enroll in the existing AgriStability program for the 2025 program year is extended to July 31, 2025. The AgriStability Program includes an option to access timely support through an Interim Benefit, which gives producers the option of receiving funds prior to the completion of the fiscal period in the program year. This can help support losses and cover costs. 

    SCIC recognizes the most pressing concern for livestock producers is reduced hay and pasture production. Pasture acres are insured for the impact of dry conditions through the Forage Rainfall Insurance Program. Starting July 15, 2025, eligible producers will begin to receive claim payments, providing timely financial relief to help offset the impact of below average rainfall. By August 15, 2025, remaining claims are automatically calculated based strictly upon weather station data.

    Saskatchewan Farm Stress Line provides support when producers need it the most. This is a confidential service, available 24-hours-a-day, seven-days-a-week, toll-free at 1-800-667-4442. Calls are answered by Mobile Crisis Services Regina, a non-profit, community-based agency and there is no call display.

    Crop Insurance is a federal-provincial-producer cost-shared program that helps producers manage production and quality losses. Support for the program is provided by the governments of Canada and Saskatchewan under the Sustainable Canadian Agricultural Partnership (Sustainable CAP).

    For more information, producers can call 1-888-935-0000, visit scic.ca or contact their local SCIC office.

    -30-

    For more information, contact:

    MIL OSI Canada News

  • MIL-OSI Canada: Governments of Canada and Saskatchewan Provide Drought Support with the Doubled Low Yield Appraisal

    Source: Government of Canada regional news

    Released on June 27, 2025

    Today, federal Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food Heath MacDonald and Saskatchewan Minister of Agriculture Daryl Harrison announced the Saskatchewan Crop Insurance Corporation (SCIC) is implementing measures to offer support to producers facing this year’s challenging dry conditions. SCIC is implementing the double low yield appraisal process, encouraging acres of low-yielding eligible crops to be diverted to make additional feed available to graze, bale or silage. 

    “I’ve spoken with livestock and crop producers in Saskatchewan who are worried about the impact that dry conditions could have this year,” MacDonald said. “Changing the yield threshold will give them some breathing room, so they can make the best decisions for their operations.”

    “In multiple areas throughout the province, our livestock producers are facing challenges from this year’s dry conditions,” Harrison said. “There is a need to quickly adapt to best support producers’ timely, on-farm decisions. In 2021 and 2023, this same initiative was successfully implemented, resulting in over half a million acres of additional low yield crop redirected to feed. Once again, livestock producers are encouraged to work directly with neighbouring crop producers to access additional feed.”

    When crops are severely damaged and the appraised yield falls below an established threshold level, the yield is reduced to zero for the Crop Insurance claim. SCIC is doubling the low yield appraisal threshold values, allowing customers to salvage their eligible crops as feed, without negatively impacting future individual coverage. Prior to compensation, all qualifying acres for double low yield appraisals must be diverted to livestock feed. They cannot be left to harvest. Prior to putting damaged crops to an approved alternate use, producers should contact their local SCIC office.

    “This announcement is welcome news for our livestock producers,” SARM President Bill Huber said. “As in past years, it will help address feed shortages so many ranchers are experiencing. Timely support like this is critical to ensuring the sustainability of the sector in this province.”

    “Many cattle producers throughout the province are facing potential feed shortages,” Saskatchewan Cattle Association Chair Chad Ross said. “The recent rains may help with some of the later seeded crops and possible pasture rebound in some areas. Unfortunately, the hay crop was already burnt off in several places. Writing off some crops through doubling the low yield threshold will provide cattle producers an option for feeding their animals they didn’t previously have. The SCA thanks Ministers Harrison and MacDonald, along with the governments for moving quickly on this.”

    “We appreciate governments recognizing and meeting the need to support access to feed,” Saskatchewan Stock Growers Association President Jeff Yorga said. “There are producers struggling with drought conditions. They are assessing and adjusting crop and feed requirements. This action taken helps our producers make those important decisions in a timely fashion. As we move forward, I strongly encourage producers to directly connect with each other to coordinate access to any additional feed made available through this change.”

    “Swift action from government has provided a vital lifeline to many Saskatchewan farmers and ranchers amid this year’s early challenges,” APAS President Bill Prybylski said. “The quick adjustment of support measures reflects a strong commitment to agriculture and sets a high standard for proactive, responsive risk management programming. Producers across the province feel heard, supported and valued.”

    AgriStability can provide support to producers for production losses and increased expenses resulting from dry conditions. In most cases, the additional expense a producer incurs to acquire additional feed for their livestock is an eligible expense through the AgriStability Program. The deadline for producers to enroll in the existing AgriStability program for the 2025 program year is extended to July 31, 2025. The AgriStability Program includes an option to access timely support through an Interim Benefit, which gives producers the option of receiving funds prior to the completion of the fiscal period in the program year. This can help support losses and cover costs. 

    SCIC recognizes the most pressing concern for livestock producers is reduced hay and pasture production. Pasture acres are insured for the impact of dry conditions through the Forage Rainfall Insurance Program. Starting July 15, 2025, eligible producers will begin to receive claim payments, providing timely financial relief to help offset the impact of below average rainfall. By August 15, 2025, remaining claims are automatically calculated based strictly upon weather station data.

    Saskatchewan Farm Stress Line provides support when producers need it the most. This is a confidential service, available 24-hours-a-day, seven-days-a-week, toll-free at 1-800-667-4442. Calls are answered by Mobile Crisis Services Regina, a non-profit, community-based agency and there is no call display.

    Crop Insurance is a federal-provincial-producer cost-shared program that helps producers manage production and quality losses. Support for the program is provided by the governments of Canada and Saskatchewan under the Sustainable Canadian Agricultural Partnership (Sustainable CAP).

    For more information, producers can call 1-888-935-0000, visit scic.ca or contact their local SCIC office.

    -30-

    For more information, contact:

    MIL OSI Canada News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Carbajal Statement on Supreme Court Decision on Birthright Citizenship Case

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Representative Salud Carbajal (CA-24)

    U.S. Representative Salud Carbajal (D-CA-24) released the statement below following the U.S. Supreme Court’s 6-3 decision to limit lower court judges’ ability to block President Trump’s birthright citizenship order nationwide. 

    “Today, the Supreme Court disrupted a foundational American principle: that everyone born in our country is rightfully an American citizen. The mixed decision threatens to create a fractured system where a child born in one state is a U.S. citizen, but a child born across state lines in another is not,” said Rep. Carbajal. “Once again, this radical Supreme Court is empowering Donald Trump and abandoning its role as a co-equal branch of government. While this legal battle is not over as the case works its way through the lower courts, I call on Republicans in Congress to uphold their oath and work with Democrats to fight this assault on the Constitution.” 

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Carbajal Statement on Supreme Court Decision on Birthright Citizenship Case

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Representative Salud Carbajal (CA-24)

    U.S. Representative Salud Carbajal (D-CA-24) released the statement below following the U.S. Supreme Court’s 6-3 decision to limit lower court judges’ ability to block President Trump’s birthright citizenship order nationwide. 

    “Today, the Supreme Court disrupted a foundational American principle: that everyone born in our country is rightfully an American citizen. The mixed decision threatens to create a fractured system where a child born in one state is a U.S. citizen, but a child born across state lines in another is not,” said Rep. Carbajal. “Once again, this radical Supreme Court is empowering Donald Trump and abandoning its role as a co-equal branch of government. While this legal battle is not over as the case works its way through the lower courts, I call on Republicans in Congress to uphold their oath and work with Democrats to fight this assault on the Constitution.” 

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Carbajal Statement on Supreme Court Decision on Birthright Citizenship Case

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Representative Salud Carbajal (CA-24)

    U.S. Representative Salud Carbajal (D-CA-24) released the statement below following the U.S. Supreme Court’s 6-3 decision to limit lower court judges’ ability to block President Trump’s birthright citizenship order nationwide. 

    “Today, the Supreme Court disrupted a foundational American principle: that everyone born in our country is rightfully an American citizen. The mixed decision threatens to create a fractured system where a child born in one state is a U.S. citizen, but a child born across state lines in another is not,” said Rep. Carbajal. “Once again, this radical Supreme Court is empowering Donald Trump and abandoning its role as a co-equal branch of government. While this legal battle is not over as the case works its way through the lower courts, I call on Republicans in Congress to uphold their oath and work with Democrats to fight this assault on the Constitution.” 

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Carbajal Statement on Supreme Court Decision on Birthright Citizenship Case

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Representative Salud Carbajal (CA-24)

    U.S. Representative Salud Carbajal (D-CA-24) released the statement below following the U.S. Supreme Court’s 6-3 decision to limit lower court judges’ ability to block President Trump’s birthright citizenship order nationwide. 

    “Today, the Supreme Court disrupted a foundational American principle: that everyone born in our country is rightfully an American citizen. The mixed decision threatens to create a fractured system where a child born in one state is a U.S. citizen, but a child born across state lines in another is not,” said Rep. Carbajal. “Once again, this radical Supreme Court is empowering Donald Trump and abandoning its role as a co-equal branch of government. While this legal battle is not over as the case works its way through the lower courts, I call on Republicans in Congress to uphold their oath and work with Democrats to fight this assault on the Constitution.” 

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Reps. Scholten, Landsman, Tran Launch the Lowering Costs Caucus

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congresswoman Hillary Scholten – Michigan

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — Today, U.S. Representatives Hillary Scholten (MI-03), Greg Landsman (OH-01), and Derek Tran (CA-45) launched the Lowering Costs Caucus. The caucus is focused on bringing down everyday costs for hard working Americans and calling out policies that make life more expensive for families across the country.

    WATCH: Lowering Costs Caucus Press Conference

    “By nearly every measure, life for American families is becoming more unaffordable each day, and the American people are tired of broken promises and political posturing. Our mission is simple: to make life more affordable for the people we serve–not to protect special interests or the ultra-rich,” said Rep. Scholten. “The Lowering Costs Caucus will be laser-focused on delivering real results that ease the burden on families and highlighting the ways Americans are paying the price of the Trump Administration.”

    “I am proud to join my colleagues, Rep. Scholten and Rep. Landsman, as founding members of the Lowering Costs Caucus to find common-sense solutions that make life more affordable for our constituents,” said Representative Tran. “I hear from families across CA-45 that they struggle to afford daycare, groceries, gas, and so much more. We are starting this caucus to shine a light on these challenges and bring members together to find real solutions to lower costs for working families. ” 

    “Folks deserve to see their hard work finally pay off. The Lowering Costs Caucus will push for real fixes that can actually make life more affordable for Americans. The Trump Administration’s chaos isn’t helping,” said Congressman Landsman. “Our goal is to help lower costs and support workers, families, small businesses, and farmers.”

    The Lowering Costs Caucus will serve as a platform to unite around common-sense solutions that make life more affordable for American families. The caucus will also work to elevate stories directly from constituents to shine a light on the ways the Trump Administration and House Republicans are driving up costs and squeezing household budgets.

    President Trump promised to bring down prices on day one but instead, he has delivered reckless tariffs–hitting families with the largest middle-class tax increase in history. Meanwhile, Republicans in Congress are handing out tax breaks to billionaires while gutting critical programs like Medicaid, food assistance, and other essential services that help working families stay afloat. 

    Republicans’ budget plan not only disproportionately benefits the ultra-wealthy, but it also raises costs for Americans. With this bill, national average electricity costs are expected to increase by $113 and median home loans are predicted to jump by $600-$1240 yearly. Trump’s tariffs, if implemented, would raise prices on food, clothing, and other goods that could cost the average household an additional $4,900 a year. 

    The caucus aims to support legislation that delivers meaningful economic relief for hard-working families, prioritizing kitchen table issues over tax giveaways for the ultra-wealthy. This effort underscores the members ongoing commitment to fighting for policies that help families get ahead, not just get by.

    Reps. Scholten, Landsman, and Tran serve as Co-Chairs of the caucus. Reps. Sarah Elfreth (MD-03), Maggie Goodlander (NH-02), Maxine Dexter (OR-03), and Suhas Subramanyam (VA-10) have also joined the Lowering Costs Caucus.

    ###

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Lawler, Hill, Gottheimer, Kean Jr., and Moskowitz Introduce Bill to Crack Down on Countries That Wrongfully Detain Americans

    Source: US Congressman Mike Lawler (R, NY-17)

    Washington, D.C — 6/27/25… This week, Reps. Mike Lawler (NY-17), French Hill (AR-02), Josh Gottheimer (NJ-05), Tom Kean Jr. (NJ-07), and Jared Moskowitz (FL-23) introduced the Countering Wrongful Detention Act of 2025, which would create a designation for countries or nonstate actors that engage in the unlawful or wrongful detention of U.S. citizens and permanent residents, empowering the Secretary of State and Congress to hold them accountable.

    The bill provides congressional oversight by requiring that all state sponsors of unlawful or wrongful detention designations expire unless Congress passes a joint resolution to approve them within six months. Congress would also have the authority to terminate a designation through a joint resolution, ensuring these decisions reflect the interests of the American people and are subject to public accountability.

    This legislation further directs the Secretary of State to brief Congress on whether the following countries should be designated under this new authority:

    • China
    • Russia
    • Iran
    • Afghanistan
    • Eritrea
    • Nicaragua
    • Syria
    • Venezuela
    • Belarus

    “As a co-lead on the Countering Wrongful Detention Act, I’m proud to be joining a bipartisan group of colleagues working to protect Americans held hostage by rogue nations as political pawns. This legislation will provide the State Department with the necessary tools to exert pressure while ensuring that Congress maintains accountability. American families deserve nothing less,” said Congressman Lawler.

    “When Americans are wrongfully detained abroad, it’s not just a personal tragedy — it’s a direct attack on the United States. Those who wrongfully detain Americans must know that there will be real consequences for using U.S. citizens as political pawns. That’s why our bill gives the State Department the tools it needs to hold bad actors accountable while keeping Congress firmly engaged in the process. This bipartisan bill is a strong step toward protecting Americans by deterring and punishing them,” said Congressman Hill.

    “As the United States faces increasing threats from foreign adversaries, protecting Americans abroad must remain a top priority. I am proud to help introduce the bipartisan Countering Wrongful Detention Act alongside Congressman Hill to ensure the State Department has the tools it needs to hold bad actors accountable,” said Congressman Gottheimer. “This bipartisan bill will help bring home Americans wrongfully detained around the world and strengthen efforts to prevent future hostage taking. To those being held, and their families, our message is clear: we stand with you and we are fighting every day to bring you home.”

    “My constituent, Sarah Moriarty, lost her father, Robert Levinson, after he was taken hostage by Iran in 2007. Her family spent years wondering where he was, not knowing if he was alive or if they would ever see him again. Sadly, far too many American families have lived through that same kind of fear and heartbreak,” said Congressman Kean Jr. “Hostile regimes like Iran continue to use innocent Americans as bargaining chips, dehumanizing and mistreating them—and in some cases, even taking their lives. The Countering Wrongful Detention Act makes it clear that there will be consequences for this kind of behavior, and the United States will always go to great lengths to protect its citizens.”

    “For years, my constituent Bob Levinson was illegally, unjustly, and unacceptably held by the Iranian regime. Bad actors like these can’t detain Americans without cause and think they can get away with it. I’m helping lead the Countering Wrongful Detention Act because this bipartisan bill puts real tools in place that’ll crack down on this practice and send a strong, bipartisan signal that our government will hold accountable any state or nonstate actors who threaten Americans in this way,” said Congressman Moskowitz. 

    “Since the introduction of PPD30 ten years ago, and the Robert A. Levinson Hostage Recovery and Hostage Taking Accountability Act in 2019, we have seen marked improvement in how our government handles the cases of American nationals held hostage by state and nonstate actors,” said Sarah (Levinson) Moriarty, Co-Founder of R. A. Levinson & Associates and Fellow, New America Future Security Program. “This important bipartisan legislation, coming at such a critical time when Americans continue to be taken on a weekly basis as political bargaining chips, is a giant leap forward in creating tangible deterrence that stops bad actors from continuing this horrific practice. Thank you to Representatives Hill, Gottheimer, Kean Jr., Lawler, and Moskowitz for their leadership on this issue. We hope to see this legislation passed by Congress and swiftly signed into law, as we know it will help prevent so many Americans from falling victim to the suffering that my father, my family, my friends in the hostage community, and far too many others have experienced.”

    “The Foley Foundation supports the bipartisan introduction of this bill in the House of Representatives by Reps. Hill, Kean Jr, Lawler, Gottheimer, and Moskowitz to ensure hostile regimes that take American nationals for political leverage face greater and targeted consequences. We welcome oversight provisions to require public testimony or public reporting that will allow the American people to better understand the threat of international hostage-taking.” 

    The bipartisan legislation creates a new authority for the Secretary of State to formally designate countries or nonstate actors as state sponsors of unlawful or wrongful detention, creating a deterrent framework similar to the existing state sponsors of terrorism designation. Once designated, the Secretary may impose a range of penalties on those governments, including diplomatic and economic consequences.

    Congressman Lawler is one of the most bipartisan members of Congress and represents New York’s 17th Congressional District, which is just north of New York City and contains all or parts of Rockland, Putnam, Dutchess, and Westchester Counties. He was rated the most effective freshman lawmaker in the 118th Congress, 8th overall, surpassing dozens of committee chairs. 

    ###

    Full text of the bill can be found HERE.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI United Nations: 27 June 2025 Departmental update Partners unite to launch WHO Disability Health Equity

    Source: World Health Organisation

    WHO has launched the WHO Disability Health Equity Initiative, a landmark global initiative to advance health equity for over 1.3 billion people with disabilities.

    Unveiled on 10 June 2025, at the United Nations Headquarters in New York during the 18th session of the Conference of States Parties to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, the initiative marks a bold step toward achieving health equity for all. The initiative aims to guide governments, health institutions, and communities in addressing barriers to care, promoting inclusive policies, and strengthening data and research on disability and health. Over 150 participants—government leaders, civil society, academia, and persons with disabilities—gathered in person, while many more joined online.

    Darryl Barrett, WHO’s Technical Lead on Disability presented a bold vision for the initiative. He discussed persistent systemic failures – political inaction, underinvestment, fragmented collaboration, and the exclusion of organizations of persons with disabilities – as critical barriers to progress. “Health systems are not fit-for-purpose,” Barrett said. “If we agree on Health for All, then we must agree that services must be inclusive and accessible. Right now, we can’t say that with confidence.”

    The Initiative is built around four strategic pillars:

    1. Leadership by persons with disabilities and their organizations
    2. Political prioritization of disability-inclusive health
    3. Inclusive health systems and service delivery
    4. Strengthening data and evidence

    Barrett also outlined how this new initiative will facilitate strategic engagement with key partners to advance health equity for persons with disabilities, including through a multi-stakeholder network, partnerships with the private sector, technical guidance development, and support for country-level implementation. He emphasized that WHO’s work has been shaped by years of collaboration with diverse partners, including organizations of persons with disabilities. “We at WHO haven’t done this by ourselves,” Barrett noted. “The strong presence of partners – both in the room and online – reflects the shared commitment needed to drive meaningful, lasting change.”

    David Duncan, Special Olympics athlete and Chair of the Global Athlete Leadership Council, delivered a powerful testimony about the discrimination people with intellectual and developmental conditions often face in health care. “Invisible, unknown, disrespected… but I know it’s possible to do better – and that’s something everyone deserves,” Duncan said.

    Norway’s Minister of Culture and Equality, Lubna Jaffery, issued a powerful call to action, urging governments to close health access gaps and uphold the rights of persons with disabilities. Emphasizing access to health services, reproductive autonomy for women with disabilities, and expanded availability of assistive products, Jaffery affirmed Norway’s leadership in disability-inclusive development. “Inclusion is not just a policy, it is a principle and we are committed to making it a reality for all.”

    Sweden’s Director-General of the Agency for Participation, Malin Ekman-Aldén, echoed this commitment, stressing that advancing health equity for persons with disabilities is a human rights imperative. She highlighted Sweden’s continued investments in inclusive development and welcomed the WHO initiative as a key driver of accountability, better data, and systemic change.

    Dirk Platzen, Director at Australia’s Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, underscored the need for political leadership in building inclusive health systems. Introducing Australia’s new International Disability Equity and Rights Strategy, he called for recognition of health as a fundamental human right, not a privilege.

    Representing Germany, Michael Schloms of the Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development emphasized international collaboration, sustainable financing, and shared responsibility. Reflecting on Germany’s experience hosting global disability events and co-leading the Global Disability Summit, he reaffirmed support for the initiative and the Amman-Berlin Declaration.

    Speakers from civil society, funding agencies, and academia highlighted the importance of funding, civil society engagement, and academic research in sustaining momentum and ensuring accountability. Ola Abualghaib, Director of the Global Disability Fund, emphasized the Fund Strategy’s alignment with the new WHO initiative. Hannah Loryman, Co-Chair of the International Disability and Development Consortium UN Task Force, stressed the vital role of civil society in advocacy, technical input, and accountability. Bonnielin Swenor, Director of the Disability Health Research Center at Johns Hopkins University, highlighted academia’s responsibility to advance disability health equity through inclusive research, education, and community engagement. She called for a paradigm shift from “living with a disability” to “thriving with a disability,” driven by data and implementation science.

    This initiative offers a pathway to making better choices – choices that ensure dignity, autonomy, and the right to health for all persons with disabilities.

    Jarrod Clyne / Deputy Director of the International Disability Alliance

    Audience members raised critical issues including the need for sustainable health system funding in humanitarian crises, the inclusion of Deaf people and persons with a psychosocial condition, the importance of training health professionals, digital health acccessibility, and support for independent living – highlighting the diverse and intersectional challenges that must be addressed to achieve true health equity for persons with disabilities.

    Jarrod Clyne, Deputy Executive Director of the International Disability Alliance, closed the event by stressing the importance of persistence, partnership, and shared responsibility. “This initiative offers a pathway to making better choices – choices that ensure dignity, autonomy, and the right to health for all persons with disabilities,” he said.

    MIL OSI United Nations News

  • Operation Sindhu: Over 4,400 Indians evacuated from Iran and Israel, says MEA

    Source: Government of India

    Source: Government of India (4)

    The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA), in a press release issued on Friday, announced the successful completion of Operation Sindhu—a major evacuation effort launched by the Government of India to bring back its nationals from conflict-affected regions in Iran and Israel. The operation, which commenced on June 18, was undertaken in response to the escalating security situation in West Asia.

    According to the MEA, a total of 4,415 Indian nationals were evacuated—3,597 from Iran and 818 from Israel—using 19 special evacuation flights, including three Indian Air Force (IAF) C-17 aircraft. The coordinated efforts were supported by Indian diplomatic missions across the region and were made possible with the cooperation of several foreign governments.

    The press release also noted that in addition to Indian citizens, 14 Overseas Citizen of India (OCI) cardholders, 9 Nepali nationals, 4 Sri Lankan nationals, and one Iranian spouse of an Indian national were also safely evacuated. Among those rescued were over 1,500 women and 500 children, underscoring the humanitarian nature and urgency of the mission.

    For the Iran segment of the operation, Indian embassies in Tehran, Yerevan, and Ashgabat coordinated the movement of Indian nationals across land borders into Armenia and Turkmenistan on June 17 and 18. The first evacuation flights began on June 18. A key breakthrough occurred on June 20, when Iran agreed to reopen its airspace for evacuation flights following India’s request. This enabled the operation to proceed swiftly via Mashhad. Between June 18 and 26, 15 evacuation flights brought Indian citizens back to New Delhi from Yerevan, Ashgabat, and Mashhad. The evacuees included a diverse group of individuals—students, workers, professionals, pilgrims, and fishermen—from more than 15 Indian states.

    The Israel phase of Operation Sindhu began on June 23. Indian embassies in Tel Aviv, Ramallah, Amman, and Cairo facilitated the safe passage of Indian nationals into Jordan and Egypt through land corridors. From Amman and Sharm al Sheikh, 818 Indian citizens were evacuated via four special flights between June 22 and 25, including three IAF-operated C-17 aircraft.

    The MEA stated that the evacuation efforts were paused on June 25, following the reopening of regional airspace. It added that any further action would be determined based on developments in the ongoing West Asia crisis.

    “Under the guidance of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Operation Sindhu is yet another demonstration of the Government’s unwavering commitment to the safety and welfare of Indian citizens abroad,” the MEA said. The ministry also extended its gratitude to the governments of Iran, Israel, Jordan, Egypt, Armenia, and Turkmenistan for their crucial support and cooperation.

    Indian diplomatic missions remain in close contact with local authorities and Indian communities across the West Asia region to ensure their continued safety and well-being, the release concluded.

  • Operation Sindhu: Over 4,400 Indians evacuated from Iran and Israel, says MEA

    Source: Government of India

    Source: Government of India (4)

    The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA), in a press release issued on Friday, announced the successful completion of Operation Sindhu—a major evacuation effort launched by the Government of India to bring back its nationals from conflict-affected regions in Iran and Israel. The operation, which commenced on June 18, was undertaken in response to the escalating security situation in West Asia.

    According to the MEA, a total of 4,415 Indian nationals were evacuated—3,597 from Iran and 818 from Israel—using 19 special evacuation flights, including three Indian Air Force (IAF) C-17 aircraft. The coordinated efforts were supported by Indian diplomatic missions across the region and were made possible with the cooperation of several foreign governments.

    The press release also noted that in addition to Indian citizens, 14 Overseas Citizen of India (OCI) cardholders, 9 Nepali nationals, 4 Sri Lankan nationals, and one Iranian spouse of an Indian national were also safely evacuated. Among those rescued were over 1,500 women and 500 children, underscoring the humanitarian nature and urgency of the mission.

    For the Iran segment of the operation, Indian embassies in Tehran, Yerevan, and Ashgabat coordinated the movement of Indian nationals across land borders into Armenia and Turkmenistan on June 17 and 18. The first evacuation flights began on June 18. A key breakthrough occurred on June 20, when Iran agreed to reopen its airspace for evacuation flights following India’s request. This enabled the operation to proceed swiftly via Mashhad. Between June 18 and 26, 15 evacuation flights brought Indian citizens back to New Delhi from Yerevan, Ashgabat, and Mashhad. The evacuees included a diverse group of individuals—students, workers, professionals, pilgrims, and fishermen—from more than 15 Indian states.

    The Israel phase of Operation Sindhu began on June 23. Indian embassies in Tel Aviv, Ramallah, Amman, and Cairo facilitated the safe passage of Indian nationals into Jordan and Egypt through land corridors. From Amman and Sharm al Sheikh, 818 Indian citizens were evacuated via four special flights between June 22 and 25, including three IAF-operated C-17 aircraft.

    The MEA stated that the evacuation efforts were paused on June 25, following the reopening of regional airspace. It added that any further action would be determined based on developments in the ongoing West Asia crisis.

    “Under the guidance of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Operation Sindhu is yet another demonstration of the Government’s unwavering commitment to the safety and welfare of Indian citizens abroad,” the MEA said. The ministry also extended its gratitude to the governments of Iran, Israel, Jordan, Egypt, Armenia, and Turkmenistan for their crucial support and cooperation.

    Indian diplomatic missions remain in close contact with local authorities and Indian communities across the West Asia region to ensure their continued safety and well-being, the release concluded.

  • MIL-OSI Africa: Statement on recent demonstrations, incendiary rhetoric and rumors against United Nations Support Mission in Libya (UNSMIL)

    Source: Africa Press Organisation – English (2) – Report:

    Download logo

    The United Nations Support Mission in Libya (UNSMIL) affirms its uncompromising respect for the right of all citizens to demonstrate peacefully and to express their views freely. Direct engagement with the Libyan people is a cornerstone of our work, and we are always prepared to meet, engage in discussions and listen to the views of the Libyan people which includes listening to the concerns of peaceful protesters. 

    We have had protests outside our premises on a number of occasions and we receive their petitions as has been the practice with all previous demonstrations and will continue to do so. Recently on Tuesday UNSMIL met with a group of protestors at its premises to listen to their demands and concerns, and we were able to have a mutually respectful discussion. 

    However, UNSMIL is dismayed by statements purportedly from some Libyan political figures that appear to encourage not just demonstrations but going further to actively encourage unlawful actions against UN personnel and property.

    UNSMIL has always welcomed constructive criticism; however, incitement campaigns and rumors being waged against the Mission could also be an indication of an effort to undermine the advancement of any progress toward the development of a political process, which is aimed at the holding of national elections and unified institutions to achieve lasting peace and stability in Libya.

    We remind all parties of their obligation to maintain the peaceful character of any demonstration, and refrain from actions, and to commit to resolving differences through constructive dialogue.

    UNSMIL also recalls the 1946 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations and the relevant agreement concluded between the United Nations and the Libyan authorities, which guarantee the inviolability of United Nations premises. All parties are urged to respect the inviolability of United Nations premises, its personnel, and its property and assets in accordance with international law.

    UNSMIL remains steadfast in its commitment to supporting a Libyan-led political process for the benefit of all Libyan people and will continue to monitor all developments closely.

    – on behalf of United Nations Support Mission in Libya (UNSMIL).

    MIL OSI Africa