Category: Politics

  • MIL-OSI USA: Strong Statement on House Passage of One Big Beautiful Bill Act, Advancing President Trump’s Agenda

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Representative Dale Strong (Alabama)

    WASHINGTON — Representative Dale W. Strong (AL-05) issued the following statement after voting in favor of H.R. 1, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act to advance President Trump’s America First Agenda.  

    “This is not just legislation, it’s a promise kept to the American people. It’s pro-worker, pro-family, pro-growth—and it’s exactly what our country needs right now,” said Rep. Strong. “I’m proud to support President Trump’s promise to deliver historic tax relief and put money back in the pockets of American families, secure our southern border, strengthen our national security, and right-size wasteful government spending.” 

    Specifically, the bill: 

    • Secures and expands the doubled Child Tax Credit, benefiting nearly 90,000 hardworking North Alabama families 

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Africa: Mining in Motion Summit Highlights Growing Support for Formalized Artisanal and Small-scale Mining Sector (ASM) Industry

    Source: Africa Press Organisation – English (2) – Report:

    ACCRA, Ghana, June 4, 2025/APO Group/ —

    The second day of the Mining in Motion 2025 Summit highlighted global industry leaders advocating for greater formalization of the artisanal and small-scale mining sector (ASM). The event featured keynote presentations calling for increased cooperation between the ASM and large-scale operators to drive sustainable industry growth.

    David Tait, CEO of the World Gold Council, emphasized the scale and importance of the ASM sector, which provides livelihoods for over 40 million people globally. However, he noted that the sector continues to face critical challenges, including illegal operations and environmental degradation.

    “With rising global demand and gold prices, illegal mining is on the rise – fueling civil unrest, child labor and depriving governments of billions in revenue that could support development,” Tait stated. “There is a risk in slow policy responses. In 1990, ASM accounted for just 4% of global gold production; today, it represents over 20%.”

    He commended Ghana for its various mechanisms such as the Ghana Gold Board in addressing illicit mining.

    “Government leadership is a fundamental requirement,” he added.

    He called for African markets to increase focus on the professionalization and formalization of ASM operations, increasing ASM access to legitimate financing, and the adoption of mercury-free processing methods.

    He also highlighted the World Gold Council’s work with seven central banks, including several in Africa, to ensure gold purchases from ASM sources are channeled through legal frameworks. Additionally, the Council has developed a guide to foster effective collaboration between the ASM and LSM actors.

    Representing Africa’s largest gold producer, Stewart Bailey, Chief Corporate Affairs & Sustainability Officer at AngloGold Ashanti, echoed the call for coexistence.

    “ASM has been part of the value chain since we were incorporated. For many years our approach has been to co-exist with ASM wherever feasible,” noted Bailey.

    AngloGold Ashanti is working with governments, NGOs and global organizations like the World Gold Council to support ASM operators in adopting mercury-free practices, upholding human rights, and promoting environmental rehabilitation, according to Bailey.

    Allan Jorgensen, Head of Responsible Business Conduct at the OECD Centre, reinforced the importance of responsible mining practices.

    “To unlock Africa’s potential, we must confront the challenges associated with gold as a driver of illicit activities,” Jorgensen said.

    The OECD developed a Due Diligence Guidance, supported by governments and aligned with regulations like those of the London Bullion Market Association, to reduce environmental and social risks in gold supply chains.

    MIL OSI Africa

  • MIL-OSI USA: 67 North Carolina Students Headed to National History Day® Contest in Maryland

    Source: US State of North Carolina

    Headline: 67 North Carolina Students Headed to National History Day® Contest in Maryland

    67 North Carolina Students Headed to National History Day® Contest in Maryland
    jejohnson6

    After months of in-depth research, creativity, and competition, 67 students from 24 schools across North Carolina have earned their spot at the 2025 National History Day® Contest, taking place June 8–12 at the University of Maryland in College Park. They will join nearly 3,000 middle and high school students from across the globe in a celebration of historical scholarship and storytelling.

    The students qualified through North Carolina History Day, a statewide program that reached more than 5,000 participants this year. Managed by the N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources (DNCR), the program encourages students to explore the past through hands-on research aligned with this year’s theme: “Rights and Responsibilities in History.” Participants chose topics that mattered to them, ranging from civil rights movements to constitutional debates, and brought them to life through exhibits, documentaries, performances, websites, and research papers.

    “The most powerful part of this program is that it’s student-driven,” said Karen Ipock, State Coordinator for N.C. History Day. “Students pick topics that genuinely interest them, which sparks deep engagement and creative expression — whether that’s designing a website, writing a paper, or producing a live performance. It’s a program that brings history to life and gives students a voice in telling its stories.”

    Competitions began with eight regional contests held across the state, coordinated by DNCR and local partners. Top entries advanced to the state-level contest on May 3 at UNC Greensboro, where finalists were selected to represent North Carolina at nationals.

    Beyond the contest itself, several North Carolina students have also been selected for exclusive workshops and showcases in Washington, D.C., on June 11 — an added recognition of the quality and impact of their work.

    • 8th grader Thanapat Lucksanapirak from Alston Ridge Middle School in Cary, N.C., will have his documentary, “The WTO: Balancing Rights and Responsibilities in Global Trade,” shown in the Oprah Winfrey Theater at the National Museum of African American History and Culture.

    • 10th grader Andrew Lar from Watauga High School in Boone, N.C., will attend a writer’s workshop with the White House Historical Association for his research paper, “‘Not in Our Name’: The Central American Sanctuary Movement and the Struggle for Salvadoran Asylum Rights.”

    • 6th grader Elsie-Mae Clayton from Swain County Middle School in Bryson City, N.C., will showcase her exhibit at the National Museum of American History, “The Federal Government and the Broken Promises,” about the building of Fontana Dam and the Road to Nowhere.

    • 10th and 11th graders Ava Karis Renegar, Campbell Hodge, Elianna Yoder, Jonah Hardin, and Kyle Malt from Classical Scholars in Mills River, N.C., will perform their project, “Nothing About Us Without Us: How One Group of Disability Rights Activists Fought for Recognition by Forcing the Government to Accept Responsibility for Discrimination,” at the National Museum of American History.

    “The doors this competition opens for students are incredible,” said Ipock. “They’re not only sharing their research in some of the nation’s most prestigious museums, but also learning firsthand from historians, scholars, and museum professionals who are leaders in their fields.”

    The National History Day® contest wraps up on Thursday, June 12, with a highly anticipated awards ceremony recognizing the top three entries in each category. Students will also be eligible for a range of special prizes —  some up to $2,000 — for outstanding work in specific areas of historical research.

    North Carolina’s impact doesn’t end with its student competitors. Two outstanding educators — Jeffrey Stanek of Holly Shelter Middle School in Castle Hayne and Emily Lemus of EDGE Academy of Health Science in Rocky Mount — are national nominees for excellence in history education. Both have been recognized for their exceptional work in the classroom, using historical inquiry to engage and inspire students. Final selections for these prestigious teaching awards will be announced during the national contest, and North Carolina is proud to have such dedicated educators in the running.

    Students competing from each N.C. region include:

    West:  Charlie Hurwitz and Owen McAbee, Cane Creek Middle (Buncombe County); Isaiah Zebley, Gemma Edwards, and Lilly Cacawa, ArtSpace Charter (Buncombe County); Kate Huscher and Maddux Hansel, Hendersonville Middle (Henderson County); Cayden Rybicki, North Hendson High (Henderson County); Campbell Hodge, Ava Karis Renegar, Elianna Yoder, Jonah Hardin, Kyle Malt, Kathleen Godfrey, Colin Brown, David Ruland, Ezra Kushigian, Rowan Maishman, Ryan Malt, Anslee Renegar, Evie Koppin, Tybi Dugdale, and Zia Cartrett, Classical Scholars (Henderson County); Elsie-Mae Clayton, Swain County Middle (Swain County); Andrew Larsen, Watauga High (Watauga County)

    Piedmont: Anisa Hasanaj, North Carolina School Of Science and Mathematics (Durham County); Elena Gale, Emma Rose Laurell, Sophia Siebert, and Zelie Polnaszek, St. Michaels Homeschool Co-op (Gaston County); Marnie Lasher, Early College at Guilford (Guilford County); Riley Gale and Woody Taylor, Woodlawn School (Iredell County); Finn McElwee and Suh Hee Shin, Chapel Hill High (Orange County); Laura Cratty and Louisa Cratty; Cratty Family Homeschool (Orange County); Thanapat Lucksanapirak, Alston Ridge Middle (Wake County); Magali Murray, Holly Springs High (Wake County); Arsema Belete, Kaana Anda-Morelli, Katelyn Kwark, Olivia Steigerwald, and Max Wagner, Pine Springs Preparatory Academy (Wake County); Catherine Kendall, Ellen Lan, and Joyce Xu, Cary Academy (Wake County)

    East: Joselyn Hutson, Sadie Lankford, Scarlett Rauen, Ben Gardner, and Gavin Oplinger, Holly Shelter Middle (New Hanover County); Lyla Varnum and Abigail Blair, The International School at Gregory (New Hanover County); Lily Atwill, Anah Stough, and Kayligrace Moody, Isaac M Bear Early College High School (New Hanover County), Olivia Stetler, Wilmington Early College High (New Hanover County); Adam Politi, Jackson Renton, Rowan Forkin, and Slade Forkin, Cape Fear Academy (New Hanover County), Mariana Nieblas-Lugo, Pamlico County Middle (Pamlico), Blondge Phanor, Wayne School of Engineering (Wayne County)

    Each year, more than half a million students from all 50 states, Washington D.C., U.S. territories, and international schools take part in the National History Day® program. North Carolina’s affiliate, North Carolina History Day, is proudly administered by the N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources and supported by the North Caroliniana Society and the Federation of North Carolina Historical Societies. To learn more, visit www.dncr.nc.gov/nchistoryday.

    About the North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
    The N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources (DNCR) manages, promotes, and enhances the things that people love about North Carolina – its diverse arts and culture, rich history, and spectacular natural areas. Through its programs, the department enhances education, stimulates economic development, improves public health, expands accessibility, and strengthens community resiliency.

    The department manages over 100 locations across the state, including 27 historic sites, seven history museums, two art museums, five science museums, four aquariums, 35 state parks, four recreation areas, dozens of state trails and natural areas, the North Carolina Zoo, the State Library, the State Archives, the N.C. Arts Council, the African American Heritage Commission, the American Indian Heritage Commission, the State Historic Preservation Office, the Office of State Archaeology, the Highway Historical Markers program, the N.C. Land and Water Fund, and the Natural Heritage Program. For more information, please visit www.dncr.nc.gov.
    Jun 4, 2025

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Banking: Kevin Greenidge: Unbreakable, unmovable, unstoppable

    Source: Bank for International Settlements

    Good evening.

    As the stars in the life insurance business gather tonight, I am delighted to address you on the occasion of your 36th Annual Caribbean Sales Congress. It is both an honour and a privilege to engage with such a distinguished gathering of professionals who shape the financial security of our Caribbean nations.

    From the start of this Congress yesterday evening, tonight, and over the coming days, we reflect on industry trends, celebrate regulatory progress, forge new connections, and honour your exceptional achievers. Your congress theme – “Unbreakable, Unmovable, Unstoppable” – resonates deeply with me. These powerful words capture the very essence of what it means to thrive in today’s ever-evolving world, including within the life insurance and financial advisory sector. They speak to the resilience, steadfast determination, and unwavering commitment that define your work, day after day.

    Over the next few minutes, I invite you to join me on a journey exploring the vital importance of your sector and discovering what you must collectively do to remain truly unbreakable, unmovable, and unstoppable in an ever-changing world. 

    The Cornerstone of Caribbean Financial Stability

    The life insurance sector stands as an indispensable pillar supporting our Caribbean economic landscape. The numbers tell a compelling story: ordinary life plans continue to dominate market share across Barbados, the Eastern Caribbean, and Trinidad and Tobago, while group health plans remain the cornerstone in Jamaica and beyond.

    Yet despite these encouraging trends, our region’s insurance penetration rate of 2.18 percent trails significantly behind the OECD average of 4.6 percent. This gap represents not just a statistical shortfall, but a pressing opportunity for expanded financial education and awareness throughout our communities.

    But let us remember – insurance transcends mere policies and premiums; it embodies security, stability, and the safeguarding of our collective future. In a Caribbean increasingly vulnerable to economic disruptions, brought on by the climate crisis, and shifting demographics with aging populations and declining birth rates, your profession serves as a bedrock of financial protection. Whether securing a family’s stability after losing a breadwinner, or guaranteeing a child’s education, or creating pathways to dignified retirement, you provide the foundation of financial resilience upon which our communities build their dreams.

    Transforming Regional Economies Through Strategic Investment

    Our regional economies also stand at a critical crossroad, poised for strategic restructuring that will create sustainable growth platforms for generations to come. Take Barbados, for example – our economy has undergone remarkable transformation since 2018, evolving from a stagnating system burdened by debt into one characterised by sustained economic expansion and consistent debt reduction.

    We’ve made tremendous strides in enhancing our competitiveness, while simultaneously addressing both external and internal macroeconomic imbalances. The revitalisation of our formerly dormant capital market, through new treasury bill offerings and our recent long-term 20-year debenture, marks a significant milestone. With increasingly positive reviews from regional and international credit rating agencies, as evidenced by four upgrades in the last eight months, these financial products have attracted substantial interest.

    I encourage you, my regional colleagues, to reconsider your exposure to Barbadian government securities as you seek safe, secure investments from a nation firmly recommitted to fiscal prudence and sustainable, inclusive growth.

    Yet our journey has only begun, and the investment decisions made by life insurance companies like yours will prove instrumental in driving Caribbean economic growth forward. No economy can fully address its citizens’ long-term needs through fiscal measures alone. Instead, we must harness our people’s collective savings through strategic investments that accelerate sustainable growth.

    Consider this striking reality: approximately US$5.4 billion in excess cash currently sits idle in central banks across our region – low or non-earning investments that could instead fuel transformative growth. Imagine these resources channelled into developing tourism, renewable energy, and addressing the climate crisis – a fight that the Prime Minister of Barbados is leading – and innovative industries that sustainably leverage our vast marine resources and technological capabilities. How about harnessing some of this excess liquidity through a regional bond for economic development? 

    Life insurance products are uniquely designed to manage longevity risk, making your industry perfectly positioned to drive investment in crucial long-term infrastructure and both private and public securities that meet appropriate criteria. Tonight, I challenge us all to reimagine how these investments can reshape our Caribbean destiny.

    Celebrating Excellence: The Monica Robotham Story

    Now, we are gathered here tonight to celebrate a woman whose career and life is a testament to perseverance, excellence, and a profound commitment to service – Monica Robotham. Ladies and gentlemen, I am deeply honoured to join you in celebrating Monica’s extraordinary journey – a path that truly embodies what it means to be unbreakable, unstoppable, and unmoveable in your industry. Her story resonates profoundly with me because it demonstrates how dedication and service can transform not just a career but an entire community.

    From her humble beginnings at Life of Jamaica in 1987, Monica pursued excellence through prestigious designations and shattered barriers to join the industry’s elite. Her transformative leadership as President of the Jamaica Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors demonstrated unwavering commitment, breathing new life into the organisation when others might have faltered. Perhaps most inspiring was her remarkable service to vulnerable populations during the darkest days of COVID.

    Monica’s guiding principle – “You are remembered not by what you gathered, but by what you scattered” – offers us a profound model for success that transcends personal achievement. Tonight, I invite each of you to follow Monica’s example: become unbreakable through continuous professional growth, become unstoppable through selfless service to others, and become unmovable in your commitment to excellence. Her remarkable legacy highlights the truth that when we embrace these principles, we too can create lasting impact that ripples through both our profession and our communities.

    Personal and Professional Growth: Your Path to Becoming Unstoppable

    Success in this field demands more than knowledge and expertise – it requires a mindset of resilience, adaptability, and above all, continuous learning. To truly embody being unbreakable, unmovable, and unstoppable like Monica, I invite you to embrace these transformative principles in your own development journey:

    First, commit yourself to lifelong learning. The financial services landscape, like most industries today, is evolving at breath-taking speed. Regulatory shifts, technological revolutions, and emerging risks make staying informed and continuously honing your skills absolutely essential. Embrace professional development opportunities, earn new certifications, and position yourself as a trusted expert whose knowledge illuminates the path forward. The Central Bank I lead maintains an enduring tradition of training and development, and we encourage all financial services professionals to invest in their growth.

    Second, build meaningful client relationships that transcend transactions. In this era of technological convenience, the human touch remains your most precious asset. Your ability to genuinely connect with clients, deeply understand their unique needs, and provide thoughtfully tailored financial solutions, sets you apart in a crowded marketplace. Remember – a truly effective financial advisor is far more than a salesperson; you are a strategic partner guiding your clients’ financial journeys. Don’t simply sell products – ensure they meet each client’s unique circumstances and aspirations. We’ve witnessed too many instances of product mis-selling globally, and I recognise that we as Caribbean people sometimes approach long-term investing with understandable caution.

    Third, strengthen the ethical foundations upon which everything else rests. Trust must remain the fundamental currency of your industry. The financial advisory profession stands or falls on transparency, integrity, and unwavering ethical responsibility. CARAIFA’s mission to uphold rigorous industry standards testifies to the critical importance of maintaining credibility and trustworthiness in every client interaction.

    Fourth, embrace technological innovation as your ally rather than your adversary. Digital transformation is reshaping financial services in ways we could scarcely imagine a decade ago. Whether leveraging data analytics to gain deeper client insights or utilising digital platforms for enhanced service delivery, technology should be viewed as a powerful enabler rather than a disruptive force. The more effectively you harness its capabilities, the more efficient and impactful your practice becomes. Now is the perfect moment to explore artificial intelligence and understand how it can dramatically enhance efficiency, productivity, and results, throughout the insurance industry.

    Fifth, adapt nimbly to our region’s changing economic environment. The Caribbean’s economic landscape continues to evolve rapidly. The average growth in Gross Written Premiums across various markets has been modest – 2 percent in Barbados, 3 percent in Belize, and 4 percent in the Eastern Caribbean – reflecting the persistent challenges we face in achieving robust economic expansion. As financial professionals, you must anticipate market shifts, develop sophisticated understanding of economic trends, and provide solutions that are not merely relevant but genuinely sustainable over time.

    Finally, and perhaps most importantly, bring others along on your journey to success. To borrow Monica’s profound personal motto, “You are remembered not by what you gathered, but by what you scattered.” Her wisdom embodies an essential truth. In the realm of insurance and financial services, success is often measured by metrics – policies written, revenue generated, profits earned. But the true measure of your legacy lies not in what you accumulate for yourself, but in the lasting impact you create in others’ lives. And impacting others’ lives positively is at the core of your business.

    Like the parable of the mustard seed – the smallest of all seeds that grows into a mighty tree providing shelter for many – each small act of service contains within it the potential for tremendous growth and impact. Every day presents opportunities to scatter seeds of service, to scatter seeds of mentorship, and to scatter seeds of kindness – seeds that, when nurtured, blossom into lasting relationships, thriving careers, and stronger communities.

    Just as the mustard seed’s greatness lies not in its size, but in its immense potential, your most significant contributions often begin as simple gestures of support. Whether providing mentorship to emerging professionals, engaging in community outreach, or leading by example, when you climb the ladder of success like Monica, you must extend a hand to pull others up alongside you. Remember always – from the smallest seeds come the most abundant harvests.

    Embracing Monica’s Legacy of Impact

    As I close and you reflect on the profound work you do, carry Monica’s powerful words in your heart: “You are remembered not by what you gathered, but by what you scattered.” Like her, your career represents far more than a job – it embodies a life-calling. Monica has shown us that true success lies in the lives you touch, in the colleagues you mentor, and in the communities you strengthen.

    You, like Monica, possess the power to transform countless lives by ensuring families remain financially secure, businesses continue to thrive, and communities build upon foundations of economic strength.

    You are unbreakable in your commitment to serving others, mirroring Monica’s steadfast resilience through challenges, from her humble beginnings to her emergence as an industry leader.

    You are unmovable in your dedication to financial empowerment, demonstrating the same resolve Monica showed when revitalising JAIFA’s headquarters and supporting seniors during the pandemic’s darkest hours.

    You are unstoppable in your pursuit of excellence, following Monica’s inspiring example of continuous growth from her early days at Life of Jamaica through earning prestigious designations and establishing new standards of achievement.

    As you move forward into tomorrow, know that, like Monica, the seeds you scatter today will grow into the forests of tomorrow. Let her extraordinary journey inspire you to see beyond numbers, beyond commissions, to the true, transformative impact of your work. May this congress serve as a catalyst igniting renewed passion, deeper knowledge, and even greater commitment to your noble profession – a commitment to being remembered not by what you gather, but by what you scatter.

    Together, embracing Monica’s spirit of service and excellence, and guided by the wisdom of the mustard seed parable, let us continue building a Caribbean that stands financially resilient, well-insured, and confidently prepared for whatever the future may bring.

    Thank you, and may this evening’s stars light your path forward.

    Enjoy your 36th congress.

    I thank you!

    MIL OSI Global Banks

  • MIL-OSI Global: From sovereignty to sustainability: a brief history of ocean governance

    Source: The Conversation – France – By Kevin Parthenay, Professeur des Universités en science politique, membre de l’Institut Universitaire de France (IUF), Université de Tours

    The United Nations Ocean Conference (UNOC 3) will open in Nice, France, on June 9, 2025. It is the third conference of its kind, following events in New York in 2017 and Lisbon in 2022. Co-hosted by France and Costa Rica, the conference will bring together 150 countries and nearly 30,000 individuals to discuss the sustainable management of our planet’s oceans.

    This event is presented as a pivotal moment, but it is actually part of a significant shift in marine governance that has been going on for decades. While ocean governance was once designed to protect the marine interests of states, nowadays it must also address the numerous climate and environmental challenges facing the oceans.

    Media coverage of this “political moment” however should not overshadow the urgent need to reform the international law applicable to the oceans. Failing that, this summit will risk being nothing more than another platform for vacuous rhetoric.

    To understand what is at stake, it is helpful to begin with a brief historical overview of marine governance.

    The meaning of ocean governance

    Ocean governance changed radically over the past few decades. The focus shifted from the interests of states and the corresponding body of international law, solidified in the 1980s, to a multilateral approach initiated at the end of the Cold War, involving a wide range of actors (international organizations, NGOs, businesses, etc.).

    This governance has gradually moved from a system of obligations pertaining to different marine areas and regimes of sovereignty associated to them (territorial seas, exclusive economic zones (EEZs), and the high seas) to a system that takes into consideration the “health of the oceans.” The aim of this new system is to manage the oceans in line with the sustainable development goals.

    Understanding how this shift occurred can help us grasp what is at stake in Nice. The 1990s were marked by declarations, summits and other global initiatives. However, as evidenced below, the success of these numerous initiatives has so far been limited. This explains why we are now seeing a return to an approach more firmly rooted in international law, as evidenced by the negotiations on the international treaty on plastic pollution, for example.

    The “Constitution of the Seas”

    The law of the sea emerged from the Hague Conference in 1930. However, the structure of marine governance gradually came to be defined in the 1980s, with the adoption of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) in 1982.

    UNOC 3 is a direct offshoot of this convention: discussions on sustainable ocean management stem from the limitations of this founding text, often referred to as the “Constitution of the Seas”.

    UNCLOS was adopted in December 1982 at the Montego Bay Convention in Jamaica and came into force in November 1994, following a lengthy process of international negotiations that resulted in 60 states ratifying the text. At the outset, the discussions focused on the interests of developing countries, especially those located along the coast, in the midst of a crisis in multilateralism. The United States managed to exert its influence in this arena without ever officially adopting the Convention. Since then, the convention has been a pillar of marine governance.

    It established new institutions, including the International Seabed Authority, entrusted with the responsibility of regulating the exploitation of mineral resources on the seabed in areas that fall outside the scope of national jurisdiction. UNCLOS is the source of nearly all international case law on the subject.

    Although the convention did define maritime areas and regulate their exploitation, new challenges quickly emerged: on the one hand, the Convention was essentially rendered meaningless by the eleven-year delay between its adoption and implementation. On the other hand, the text also became obsolete due to new developments in the use of the seas, particularly technological advances in fishing and seabed exploitation.

    The early 1990s marked a turning point in the traditional maritime legal order. The management of the seas and oceans came to be viewed within an environmental perspective, a process that was driven by major international conferences and declarations such as the Rio Declaration (1992), the Millennium Declaration (2005), and the Rio+20 Summit (2012). These resulted in the 2030 Agenda and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), the UN’s 17 goals aimed at protecting the planet (with SDG 14, “Life Below Water”, directly addressing issues related to the oceans) and the world’s population by 2030.



    A weekly e-mail in English featuring expertise from scholars and researchers. It provides an introduction to the diversity of research coming out of the continent and considers some of the key issues facing European countries. Get the newsletter!


    The United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED, or Earth Summit), held in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, in 1992, ushered in the era of “sustainable development” and, thanks to scientific discoveries made in the previous decade, helped link environmental and maritime issues.

    From 2008 to 2015, environmental issues became more important as evidenced by the regular adoption of environmental and climate resolutions.

    A shift in UN language

    Biodiversity and the sustainable use of the oceans (SDG 14) are the two core themes that became recurring topics in the international agenda since 2015, with ocean-related issues now including items like acidification, plastic pollution and the decline of marine biodiversity.

    The United Nations General Assembly resolution on oceans and the law of the seas (LOS is a particularly useful tool to acknowledge this evolution: drafted annually since 1984, the resolution has covered all aspects of the United Nations maritime regime while reflecting new issues and concerns.

    Some environmental terms were initially absent from the text but have become more prevalent since the 2000s.

    This evolution is also reflected in the choice of words.

    While LOS resolutions from 1984 to 1995 focused mainly on the implementation of the treaty and the economic exploitation of marine resources, more recent resolutions have used terms related to sustainability, ecosystems, and maritime issues.

    Toward a new law of the oceans?

    As awareness of the issues surrounding the oceans and their link to climate change has grown, the oceans gradually became a global “final frontier” in terms of knowledge.

    The types of stakeholders involved in ocean issues have also changed. The expansion of the ocean agenda has been driven by a more “environmentalist” orientation, with scientific communities and environmental NGOs standing at the forefront of this battle. This approach, which represents a shift away from a monopoly held by international law and legal practitioners, clearly is a positive development.

    However, marine governance has so far relied mainly on non-binding declaratory measures (such as the SDGs) and remains ineffective. A cycle of legal consolidation toward a “new law of the oceans” therefore appears to be underway and the challenge is now to supplement international maritime law with a new set of measures. These include:

    Of these agreements, the BBNJ is arguably the most ambitious: since 2004, negotiators have been working toward filling the gaps of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) by creating an instrument on marine biodiversity in areas beyond national jurisdiction.

    The agreement addresses two major concerns for states: sovereignty and the equitable distribution of resources.

    Adopted in 2023, this historic agreement has yet to enter into force. For this to happen, sixty ratifications are required and to date, only 29 states have ratified the treaty (including France in February 2025, editor’s note).

    The BBNJ process is therefore at a crossroads and the priority today is not to make new commitments or waste time on complicated high-level declarations, but to address concrete and urgent issues of ocean management, such as the frantic quest for critical minerals launched in the context of the Sino-American rivalry, and exemplified by Donald Trump’s signing of a presidential decree in April 2025 allowing seabed mining – a decision that violates the International Seabed Authority’s well established rules on the exploitation of these deep-sea resources.

    At a time when U.S. unilateralism is leading to a policy of fait accompli, the UNOC 3 should, more than anything and within the framework of multilateralism, consolidate the existing obligations regarding the protection and sustainability of the oceans.

    Kevin Parthenay is a member of the Institut Universitaire de France (IUF).

    Rafael Mesquita ne travaille pas, ne conseille pas, ne possède pas de parts, ne reçoit pas de fonds d’une organisation qui pourrait tirer profit de cet article, et n’a déclaré aucune autre affiliation que son organisme de recherche.

    ref. From sovereignty to sustainability: a brief history of ocean governance – https://theconversation.com/from-sovereignty-to-sustainability-a-brief-history-of-ocean-governance-258200

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI Canada: Racist incident helpline making a difference

    Source: Government of Canada regional news

    One year after its launch on May 30, 2024, the Province’s racist incident helpline is making a difference for people in B.C. experiencing racism, with approximately 94% of callers reporting their needs were met.

    “Racism has no place in B.C., but we know it exists, and we are determined to continue to fight it in all its forms, through all the tools available at our disposal,” said Niki Sharma, Attorney General. “As part of that work, we are proud to provide this resource that is connecting so many people in need with services that can help them heal and reclaim their sense of safety and belonging. We will continue to strengthen and grow the helpline’s network so that nobody ever has to navigate the impact of a racist incident on their own.”

    The racist incident helpline is a toll-free, multilingual service for people who have been subjected to discrimination based on the colour of their skin, culture, ethnicity or place of origin. Callers receive support, guidance and referrals to local community-support services. One year after its launch, the helpline has received calls from 807 people seeking help dealing with racism, and has made more than 2,329 referrals to support services. This call volume is more than double that reported by the state of California for the first year its hate helpline was operational (2023-24), despite California’s population being seven times the size of B.C.’s.

    “I know this is a long process, but it makes me feel better to talk about everything,” said one caller to the helpline, whose family was experiencing harassment, racism, aggression, micro-aggressions and intimidation from their neighbour on a shared yard. “Thank you for your time and for listening to me. I feel less pressured now. This has been really helpful.”

    This caller accepted referrals to resources for tenant rights, legal assistance and mental-health supports.

    On average, each caller was directed to three support services, indicating people coping with racism require help on multiple fronts, such as legal advice, peer support and mental-health resources. To help strengthen the efficacy of these support networks, the Province invested $2.2 million in 32 community organizations in the 2023-24 fiscal year, for enhanced services and to better meet the urgent and diverse needs of those affected by racism in their communities.

    “The racist incident helpline is a core pillar of government’s efforts to counter racism and discrimination in B.C.,” said Jessie Sunner, parliamentary secretary for anti-racism initiatives. “It bridges a gap between people dealing with the trauma of racism and the essential services they need to heal. We are committed to continuing to empower local advocates, communities and organizations so that we can together create a province where everyone feels safe, supported and valued.”

    The toll-free helpline is available from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. on weekdays, at 1 833 457-5463 (1 833 HLP-LINE). Service is offered in more than 240 languages, and after-hours callers can request a call back during regular hours. For immediate assistance or in the case of an emergency, people should call 911.

    Quotes:

    Helpline staff member –

    “As a racialized person with lived experience myself, for me this extends beyond just a job – it is an honour to do this work. Getting to support and hold space for members of racialized communities who have experienced or witnessed a racist encounter brings me a sense of fulfilment and purpose. Amidst the daily landscape of race- and hate-motivated harms that can feel all-consuming, divisive, isolating and othering, each person I am able to support and each conversation I have is an act of solidarity.”

    Saša Loggin, executive director, Skeena Diversity Society –

    “This funding has provided us with an invaluable opportunity to dedicate staff not only to respond to incidents of racism but also to develop workshops and resources. Through this, we have deepened our connections to organizations and resources across the northern region, honouring the unique characteristics of different communities while also turning our shared humanity into a source of strength.”

    Boma Brown, executive director, Support Network for Indigenous Women & Women of Colour –

    “Our clients, who are racialized women, often experience racism at any point in their day, making culturally informed counselling an essential resource that we are able to provide thanks to this grant. This support is vital for empowering women and fostering healing in our communities.”

    Penny Bradley, executive director, Alex House, of the Association of Neighbourhood Houses of B.C. –

    “As a neighbourhood house in South Surrey and White Rock, we know that when people feel a strong sense of belonging, they thrive. Our approach is to bring together people from diverse backgrounds to learn from each other, because we believe that when we learn together, we grow together. This grant allows us to widen our reach and deepen our connections with the community. That is how we can create a community of allies that believe strongly in anti-racism.”

    Learn More:

    View the full list of racist incident helpline grant recipients here: https://news.gov.bc.ca/files/RacistIncidentHelplinegrantrecipients.pdf

    For more about the racist incident helpline, visit: https://racistincidenthelpline.ca/

    For more about the Anti-Racism Act, visit: https://news.gov.bc.ca/30655

    For more about the Resilience BC Anti-Racism Network, visit: https://www.resiliencebc.ca/

    A backgrounder follows.

    MIL OSI Canada News

  • MIL-OSI Canada: Change in Measles Immunization Recommendations for Infants with a High Risk of Exposure

    Source: Government of Canada regional news

    Released on June 4, 2025

    Saskatchewan is making the measles vaccine available to younger children in areas with measles cases and high chance of exposure. 

    Infants ages six months to 11 months who live in, are traveling to, or have contact with individuals in areas where there is a high risk of measles exposure can now receive an early dose of measles vaccine.

    “Our government wants to make sure that those who are most vulnerable and at high risk of exposure have the best protection possible,” Health Minister Jeremy Cockrill said. “Providing parents with the option for an additional dose of measles vaccine for infants, helps to protect those who cannot protect themselves.”

    Immunization is the single most effective way to protect against measles. 

    Routine measles vaccination is still needed at 12 and 18 months to provide lifelong protection. 

    “Most children in Saskatchewan should follow the regular schedule for measles immunization, however, in outbreak situations infants six to 11 months can be offered an earlier dose,” Chief Medical Health Officer Dr. Saqib Shahab said. “This is similar to what is already being offered to some infants travelling internationally or to other parts of Canada with higher measles case numbers.”

    Measles is highly contagious and spreads easily to others through open air. Symptoms can include fever, cough, red eyes and a blotchy red rash. Severe complications of measles may include pneumonia, swelling of the brain and death.

    Individuals with symptoms of measles should stay home and call HealthLine 811 for instructions. Do not go to a clinic, health care facility or hospital in person without calling ahead.

    The measles vaccine has been safely used for over 50 years and is free in Saskatchewan at public health offices. 

    “As we move into the summer months, measles continues to pose a risk for people in Saskatchewan,” SHA Senior Medical Health Officer Dr. Julie Kryzanowski said. “Please check your measles vaccination records and ensure you are up to date.”

    For a current list of areas with a high risk of exposure and more information on measles, please visit: saskatchewan.ca/measles.

    -30-

    For more information, contact:

    Media Desk
    Health
    Regina
    Phone: 306-787-4083
    Email: media@health.gov.sk.ca

    Media Relations
    Saskatchewan Health Authority
    Regina
    Phone: 1-833-766-4392
    Email: media@saskhealthauthority.ca

    MIL OSI Canada News

  • MIL-OSI Canada: Removing Trade Barriers With Other Provinces, Federal Government

    Source: Government of Canada regional news

    Trade barriers between Nova Scotia, several provinces and the federal government will soon be removed.

    Nova Scotia, along with Alberta, British Columbia, Manitoba, Ontario and Prince Edward Island have taken action to remove barriers and red tape that will open up new trade and investment opportunities. It is also anticipated that the federal government will do the same.

    “Removing these barriers will open up new opportunities for Nova Scotian businesses and help grow our economy – that means more jobs for Nova Scotians,” said Premier Tim Houston. “This is how Nova Scotia and Canada can be more economically secure.”

    The barriers being removed by Nova Scotia focus on three key areas:

    • ending Canadian Free Trade Agreement exemptions that limit interprovincial trade with Nova Scotia
    • allowing goods or services that are legally sold, used or provided in another province to automatically be able to be sold/used/provided in Nova Scotia without having to meet Nova Scotia’s specific labelling, packaging, certification or inspection requirements
    • removing labour mobility barriers by requiring regulators to process equivalent licences within 10 business days and restricting application requirements to evidence of good standing and liability insurance.

    The Province introduced the Free Trade and Mobility within Canada Act in February 2025 to help create mutual recognition of goods, services and labour mobility between Nova Scotia and other jurisdictions in Canada. The act allows the Province to remove barriers to trade and investment with others that will do the same for Nova Scotia.

    Nova Scotia’s removal of trade barriers with Alberta and P.E.I. comes into effect immediately, while barriers with the other provinces and federal government will be removed upon proclamation of their equivalent legislation.


    Quotes:

    “Alberta is proud to stand alongside Nova Scotia in advancing a more open and co-operative Canadian economy. I commend Premier Tim Houston and the Nova Scotia government for taking meaningful action to support freer trade within Canada. By recognizing Alberta-approved goods without additional red tape, Nova Scotia is showing leadership that supports businesses, strengthens interprovincial ties and moves us closer to the internal trade framework Canadians expect and deserve.”
    Danielle Smith, Premier of Alberta

    “With tariffs and tariff threats taking aim at Canada’s workers and businesses, it’s never been more important for us to work together from coast to coast to tear down internal trade barriers so we can make Canada stronger and more united than ever before. We’re going to keep working with our federal, provincial and territorial partners to unlock economic opportunity and build a more competitive, resilient and prosperous country that can stand up to tariffs and anything else that comes our way.”
    Doug Ford, Premier of Ontario

    “This announcement is one of the first tangible steps in adopting mutual recognition policy and breaking down interprovincial trade barriers, showing that the Premier and his government are serious about free trade within Canada. Simply put, this is good news for small businesses in our province. Now, eight in 10 small businesses across Canada are looking to their provinces to take the necessary steps to follow Nova Scotia’s lead.”
    Duncan Robertson, Director of Legislative Affairs (Nova Scotia), Canadian Federation of Independent Business


    Quick Facts:

    • interprovincial exports contribute about 17 per cent of Nova Scotia’s gross domestic product
    • interprovincial exports make up about half of Nova Scotia’s total exports (about 48 per cent of all goods and services)
    • in 2023, the value of Nova Scotia’s interprovincial exports was nearly $29 billion
    • one-third of Canadian businesses participated in internal trade by buying or selling goods across provincial or territorial borders
    • more than $530 billion worth of goods and services moves across provincial and territorial borders every year – equal to 20 per cent of Canada’s gross domestic product

    Additional Resources:

    Free Trade and Mobility within Canada Act: https://nslegislature.ca/sites/default/files/legc/statutes/free%20trade%20and%20mobility%20within%20canada.pdf

    MIL OSI Canada News

  • MIL-OSI USA: House Republicans Receive Official Request to Codify DOGE Cuts

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Representative Mike Johnson (LA-04)

    House Republicans Receive Official Request to Codify DOGE Cuts

    Washington, June 3, 2025

    WASHINGTON — Speaker Johnson released the following statement to confirm the House received the Trump Administration’s rescissions request to cut $9.4 billion in wasteful spending identified by DOGE.

    “House Republicans will continue delivering on our mandate from the American people: to restore efficiency and accountability to the federal government. Today, we have officially received the rescissions request from the White House to eliminate $9.4 billion in wasteful foreign aid spending at State and USAID and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which funds NPR and PBS. The House will act quickly on this request.
     
    “Under President Trump, every federal taxpayer dollar is actually being used to serve the American people, not to fund a bloated bureaucracy or purely partisan pet projects. We thank Elon Musk and his DOGE team for identifying a wide range of wasteful, duplicative, and outdated programs, and House Republicans are eager to eliminate them.
     
    “This rescissions package reflects many of DOGE’s findings and is one of the many legislative tools Republicans are using to restore fiscal sanity. Congress will continue working closely with the White House to codify these recommendations, and the House will bring the package to the floor as quickly as possible.
     
    “Democrats continue to wail and complain – NOT at the fraud, waste, and abuse – but at the Trump Administration simply for exposing it. In fact, Democrats are the only ones in Washington who do not want to stop the egregious misspending of the people’s tax dollars. Democrats continue to defend corruption, while Republicans are delivering real accountability and real savings the American people demanded in November.”

    Background:

    • The Trump Administration has assembled a package that totals $9.4 billion in wasteful or unnecessary spending identified by DOGE.
    • This package will codify DOGE cuts which include $8.3 billion in wasteful foreign aid spending and a $1.1 billion recission of federal funding for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB), which provides funds to NPR and PBS.

    Process:

    • Under the Impoundment Control Act (ICA), the Administration may transmit a request to Congress to rescind previously appropriated funds through a rescissions package. Such a package only requires a simple majority vote in the Senate to be enacted.
    • Transmittal of a package triggers a 45-day clock, during which funds in accounts included in the rescissions package are withheld from obligation pending congressional action.   

    ###

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: House Republican Leadership Statement on Rescissions

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Representative Mike Johnson (LA-04)

    WASHINGTON — Speaker Johnson, Leader Scalise, Whip Emmer, and Chairwoman McClain released the following joint statement after Congress officially received the Trump Administration’s rescissions request:

    “Today, the House has officially received the rescissions request from the White House to eliminate $9.4 billion in wasteful foreign aid spending at the State Department and USAID and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which funds NPR and PBS. 

    “Now that this wasteful spending by the federal government has been identified by DOGE, quantified by the Administration, and sent to Congress, House Republicans will fulfill our mandate and continue codifying into law a more efficient federal government. This is exactly what the American people deserve.

    “Next week, we will put the rescissions bill on the floor of the House and encourage all our Members to support this commonsense measure.” 

    ###

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Speaker Johnson Joins Meet the Press

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Representative Mike Johnson (LA-04)

    WASHINGTON — This morning, Speaker Johnson joined Kristen Welker on NBC’s Meet the Press to further dispel myths about the One Big Beautiful Bill.

    “The One Big Beautiful Bill is a big first step to provide relief for the American people, to give everybody more take home pay, more money in their pocket, and to change the trajectory of the country,” Speaker Johnson said. “And again, it’s the first of a number of steps. And President Trump is committed to doing this.”

    Watch the full interview here

    On the CBO discounting economic growth:

    The CBO sometimes gets projections correct, but they’re always off every single time when they project economic growth. They always underestimate the growth that will be brought about by tax cuts and reduction in regulations. When we did this in 2017, the first two years of the Trump administration, we literally brought about the greatest economy in the history of the world, not just the US. Because we got the government off the backs of the people who create the jobs. And we’ve allowed hardworking Americans to have more money in their pocket that they could take home. We’re doing that again. Remember in this big beautiful bill, the reason we call it that is because there’s benefits for everybody. It’s geared for hardworking Americans, lower and middle income Americans. No tax on tips, no tax on overtime, no tax on interest on car loans if you buy products made in the USA.

    We’re going to give relief to seniors on social security. There’s so many benefits and features in this bill, and it’s going to allow everybody to do better. And at the same time, projecting and ensuring the largest amount of savings literally in history. There’s no government on planet Earth that’s ever saved over $1.6 trillion in a piece of legislation. This one does. And so when you reduce government spending and you allow people to keep more of their hard-earned money, the economy grows. And that’s exactly what’s going to happen here.

    On Republican efforts to strengthen Medicaid:

    There are no Medicaid cuts in the big beautiful bill. We we’re not cutting Medicaid. What we’re doing is strengthening the program. We’re reducing fraud, waste, and abuse that is rampant in Medicaid to ensure that program, which is essential for so many people, ensure that it’s available for the most vulnerable. It’s intended for young, single pregnant women and the disabled and the elderly. But what’s happening right now is you have a lot of people, for example, young men, able-bodied workers who are on Medicaid. They’re not working when they can; that drains resources from the people that need it most. And so, what we’re doing here is an important and frankly, heroic thing to preserve the program so that it doesn’t become insolvent. This is not going to hurt rural hospitals. There’s a lot of flex flexibility built into this.

    They keep saying that, you know, 7.6 million people is the figure that are supposedly going to be affected by this. But when you look at those numbers and you break them down, this is high on public opinion polling, you’re talking about 1.4 million illegal aliens that are receiving Medicaid right now. They’re not entitled to that. This is for US citizens in those vulnerable populations. There’s about 4.8 million people that they’re referring to that are able-bodied workers. If you are able to work and you’re not, and you are riding on the public wagon, you need to help pull it. And by the way, Kristen, this is no draconian requirement. All we are requiring in the legislation is 20 hours a week. You can volunteer in your community. You can be in a job training program or you can get to work.

    On Democrat lies about “millionaire” tax cuts:

    That’s a Democrat talking point. This is not giving tax cuts to millionaires. It’s the opposite. The people in the tax bracket that you’re referring to, many of them are small business owners. They are the people that provide the jobs in every community in America. They use pass through taxation. And, we don’t want to to get in the weeds, we don’t have time to get into the complications of it, but we are the party that reduces taxes for all Americans. And I’m telling you, the one big beautiful bill is geared for hardworking Americans. The biggest beneficiaries of this will be low and middle income Americans. That’s what we did in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. That’s what we’ll do again, by extending those tax cuts in perpetuity and making them permanent. That was a major promise of the president on the campaign trail. It’s a major promise of ours and we are going to fulfill it. The Republican Party is doing right by the American people and they’re going to feel the effects of that soon.

    ###

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Republicans Introduce Partisan Military Construction, Veterans Affairs, and Related Agencies Funding Bill that Fails Our Veterans

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Representative Debbie Wasserman Schultz (FL-23)

    When lowering costs for Americans should drive every decision we make, this bill needlessly fixates on keeping guns in the hands of those who are potentially a danger to themselves or others and restricts reproductive rights and other cruel and pointless policy restrictions.

    Funding Proposal Raises the Costs of Veterans Health Care, Hurts Military Readiness, and Worsens Quality of Life for Servicemembers and Their Families

    WASHINGTON — House Appropriations Committee Republicans released the 2026 Military Construction, Veterans Affairs, and Related Agencies Appropriations bill, which will be considered in the subcommittee tomorrow. The legislation fails to fully meet veterans’ needs and falls short of adequately funding military construction projects.

    This bill:

    • Worsens the quality of life for servicemembers and their families and hurts military readiness by funding military construction $904 million below what is needed.
    • Enacts the Project 2025 goal to privatize medical care for veterans by transferring billions to private hospitals and clinics which will only lead to higher costs, longer wait times, poor communication and coordination, and diminished quality of care.
    • Further limits women’s access to abortion, harming women veterans’ health.
    • Leaves military installations, servicemembers, and their families vulnerable to the impacts of climate change and worsening natural disasters by failing to include dedicated funding to strength military installations against these threats.
    • Does not fulfill the United States’ commitments to our allies by providing $188 million less than what is needed on NATO infrastructure.
    • Undermines the ability to keep guns out of the hands of those prohibited under Federal law from purchasing or possessing firearms.
    • Repeats the same extreme House Republican tactics attempted last year by including partisan changes to existing law, known as “riders,” that hurt Americans and create chaos. Once again, Republicans are disenfranchising veterans rather than making VA a welcoming and inclusive place for all those who volunteer to serve our country.

    “This Republican bill would push our Veterans who sacrificed so much, towards Project 2025 privatized health care schemes and critically break with past PACT Act guaranteed funding commitments in the Toxic Exposures Fund (TEF) funding levels. When lowering costs for Americans should drive every decision we make, this bill needlessly fixates on keeping guns in the hands of those who are potentially a danger to themselves or others and restricts reproductive rights and other cruel and pointless policy restrictions. I cannot tell those currently serving and those who defended our nation that this is the best we can do, and therefore, I cannot support this bill,” Military Construction, Veterans Affairs and Related Agencies Appropriations Subcommittee Ranking Member Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-FL-25) said. “While it avoids deep, across the board cuts, it steers far too many resources into the privatized medical care account and away from vital, VA-based care and it leaves out guaranteed PACT Act funding for the TEF in FY2027, unlike past precedent. We can do far better, and Democrats are ready to do that. But this bill falls short of what our Veterans deserve.”


    “While President Trump fires veterans and dismantles the services and programs across the federal government that they depend on, House Republicans have decided to proceed—business as usual—with 2026 funding bills. They have introduced a funding bill that does nothing to remedy the chaos and pain this administration has caused thousands of veterans and instead pushes extreme, partisan Project 2025 goals of privatizing veterans health services, only raising the costs of critical care. Once again, instead of being laser focused on the cost-of-living crisis, President Trump and House Republicans are actually making it worse,”
    Appropriations Committee Ranking Member Rosa DeLauro (D-CT-03) said. “This bill falls short of honoring our commitment to veterans, servicemembers, and their families by underfunding military construction and leaving our military installations vulnerable to the impact of worsening natural disasters. Just like last year, this bill is built on a framework that harms veterans. Veterans rely on programs across the entire federal government. House Republicans’ proposal to slash critical domestic investments in other funding bills will strip away education, job opportunities, housing, and food assistance that veterans and their families depend on. House Republicans cannot claim to support veterans while making it harder for them to find jobs, feed their families, and keep roofs over their heads.”


    A summary of House Republicans’ 2026 Military Construction, Veterans Affairs, and Related Agencies Appropriations bill is here. A fact sheet of the bill is here. The full text of the bill is here. The subcommittee markup will be webcast live and linked on the House Committee on Appropriations website.

     

    ###

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: UN – Election of Annalena Baerbock as President of the 80th session of the United Nations General Assembly (4 Jun. 2025)

    Source: Republic of France in English
    The Republic of France has issued the following statement:

    France congratulates Annalena Baerbock, Germany’s former Minister of Foreign Affairs, on her June 2nd election as President of the 80th session of the United Nations General Assembly, which will begin on September 9.

    France will be delighted to work closely with Ms. Baerbock on all of the issues followed by the UN General Assembly and to promote an open, strengthened multilateral system. This year, as we mark the UN’s 80th anniversary, we reaffirm our commitment to the goals and principles enshrined in the UN Charter.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: UN – Election of new non-permanent Security Council members (4 Jun. 2025)

    Source: Republic of France in English
    The Republic of France has issued the following statement:

    France congratulates Bahrain, Colombia, Latvia, Liberia and the Democratic Republic of the Congo on their June 3rd election as non-permanent members of the UN Security Council.

    The Security Council’s main responsibility under the UN Charter is maintaining international peace and security. France will work closely with each of these partners, whose two-year terms will begin on January 1, 2026, so that the Council can fulfill its mandate of conflict resolution and peacekeeping.

    As we celebrate the 80th anniversary of the UN Charter this month, France reaffirms its commitment to a rules-based international system and to a Security Council that guarantees our collective security. As a Permanent Member of the Security Council, we advocate open, more effective multilateralism.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: Govt bonds worth $27b issued

    Source: Hong Kong Information Services

    The Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Government today announced the successful pricing of approximately HK$27 billion worth of green bonds and infrastructure bonds denominated in Hong Kong dollars (HKD), renminbi, US dollars and euro under the Government Sustainable Bond Programme and the Infrastructure Bond Programme.

    The issuance of green bonds aims to attract and channel market capital to support green projects, promoting sustainable development in Hong Kong.

    Meanwhile, infrastructure bonds help accelerate the development of projects such as the Northern Metropolis, and facilitate the early completion of projects for the good of the economy and people’s livelihood.

    Following a virtual roadshow on June 2, the bonds were priced on June 3 as follows:

    • 5 billion 30-year infrastructure tranche at 3.85%;
    • RMB4 billion 20-year green tranche at 2.6%;
    • RMB4 billion 30-year infrastructure tranche at 2.7%;
    • USD1 billion five-year green tranche at 4.151%; and
    • EUR1 billion eight-year green tranche at 3.155%.

    The offering attracted participation from over 30 markets across Asia, Europe, the Middle East and the Americas, with the total order amounting around HK$237 billion equivalent, representing a subscription ratio of around 3.3 to 12.5 times.

    The Hong Kong Monetary Authority highlighted that the HKD 30-year bond, offered for the first time by the Hong Kong SAR Government, is the longest tenor HKD bond issued by the Hong Kong SAR Government so far.

    The 20-year and 30-year RMB bonds also received overwhelming support, doubling in issuance size from last year.

    Financial Secretary Paul Chan said: “Global institutional investors responded enthusiastically to the subscription, fully reflecting their confidence in Hong Kong’s sound public finance and long-term development.

    “The inaugural offering of the 30-year HKD government bonds helps to extend the HKD benchmark yield curve, further promoting the development of the local bond market.”

    The green bonds and infrastructure bonds are expected to be settled on June 10, and listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange as well as the London Stock Exchange.

    These bonds have been assigned credit ratings of AA+ by S&P Global Ratings and AA- by Fitch.

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Padilla Expands Holds on EPA Nominees After Republicans Overrule Parliamentarian to Gut California’s Clean Air Authority

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Alex Padilla (D-Calif.)

    Padilla Expands Holds on EPA Nominees After Republicans Overrule Parliamentarian to Gut California’s Clean Air Authority

    Senator Padilla: “The Trump Administration and the Republican majority plowed ahead with an unprecedented power grab at the expense of the health of millions of children and families in California and many other states”
    Padilla releases memo outlining how Senate Republicans went nuclear on Senate rules, warns of future implications
    WASHINGTON, D.C. — After Republicans shortsightedly revoked California’s clean air waivers, U.S. Senator Alex Padilla (D-Calif.), Ranking Member of the Senate Committee on Rules and Administration and a member of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, announced his intent to place a blanket hold on Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) nominations, including proceeding with his objections to the four EPA nominations currently pending on the Senate’s Executive Calendar and holding three additional EPA nominations. In his Congressional Record Statement, Padilla stated he will maintain these seven holds until Republicans make appropriate accommodations so that California can protect its own environment and the health of its residents.
    Padilla’s objections come in response to Republicans overruling the nonpartisan Senate Parliamentarian’s decision and going nuclear on the Senate rulebook in order to rescind California’s clean air waivers that allow the state to implement more protective air quality standards. The Senate Parliamentarian determined that any resolutions aimed at overturning California waivers would not be entitled to the Congressional Review Act’s (CRA) expedited procedures and would therefore require 60 votes to secure Senate passage. However, Senate Republicans bypassed the filibuster to rescind these waivers by overruling the Parliamentarian.
    “The Senate’s constitutional role to Advise and Consent regarding executive branch nominations is an important check on agency leadership’s abuse and overreach, and raising these objections regarding EPA nominations is my duty on behalf of the people of the State of California,” wrote Senator Padilla. “I am objecting to expedited consideration of EPA nominees in response to the Trump Administration EPA’s abuse of the Congressional Review Act (CRA) by submitting three waivers issued to the State of California to Congress and claiming they are ‘rules’ under the CRA despite the Government Accountability Office’s clear determination they are not.”
    Padilla stressed that revoking California’s waivers will cause disastrous public health and environmental impacts, highlighting California’s unique air quality challenges and critical efforts to reduce harmful emissions. He also emphasized that EPA’s reckless actions by abusing the CRA fly in the face of longstanding Senate procedures to target California’s waiver authority.
    “The Trump Administration and the Republican majority plowed ahead with an unprecedented power grab at the expense of the health of millions of children and families in California and many other states,” continued Senator Padilla. “They took advantage of EPA’s abuse of the CRA to throw out the rulebook, first by overriding the procedural limits in the text of the CRA itself and then by overturning the Parliamentarian’s decision, all in their quest to take away California’s authority under the Clean Air Act.”
    “This is unacceptable,” added Senator Padilla. “California has done nearly all it can do to reduce emissions from stationary sources of air pollution within its jurisdiction. Given our unique air quality challenges and the worsening impacts of climate change, it is essential for our state to reduce pollution from mobile sources such as cars and trucks if the federal government will not do so itself. That is why Congress has provided this waiver authority to our state for decades and it has been used over 100 times. But now, as a result of the Trump EPA and Senate Republicans’ abuse of the CRA, the people of California will be forced to breathe more toxic air pollution and suffer increasingly devastating impacts of climate change.”
    The seven Senate-confirmable nominations Padilla is holding include four pending on the Senate floor and three working their way through the committee process.
    Senator Padilla also circulated a memo to his Senate colleagues outlining the broad implications of Republicans going nuclear on the Senate rules, detailing that the Senate majority went nuclear by:
    Overriding the text of the CRA, which bars points of order (which they then raised) and
    Overruling the Parliamentarian’s determination by ignoring her and “submitting the question” to the Senate as opposed to overruling the Chair.
    The memo makes clear that by defying their previous commitments and breaking 30 years of CRA precedent with the first successful use of the nuclear option on the legislative filibuster, the CRA is now open to being applied to any agency action that is submitted to Congress going back to 1996, opening up a large new window to force votes in the Senate. In addition, Senate Republicans have now permanently undermined the legislative filibuster that they have claimed to defend on the eve of budget reconciliation, where they are under pressure to overrule the Parliamentarian yet again to avoid a filibuster on legislation that would eliminate health care and nutrition assistance for millions of Americans to cut taxes for the ultra-wealthy.
    Senator Padilla has been a leading voice in pushing back against Republican attacks on California’s Clean Air Act waivers. Over the last month, Padilla has spoken on the Senate floor repeatedly to sound the alarm on Senate Republicans’ revocations of these critical waivers. Padilla, along with Senator Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) and Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), also led Democratic Ranking Members in strongly warning Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) and Majority Whip John Barrasso (R-Wyo.) of the dangerous and irreparable consequences if Senate Republicans overrule the Senate Parliamentarian’s decision on California’s waivers. Many of his Democratic colleagues voiced similar opposition to Republicans’ unprecedented dismissal of the Senate rulebook.
    In April, Padilla, Whitehouse, and Senator Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) welcomed the Senate Parliamentarian’s decision that the waivers are not subject to the CRA. Padilla also joined Whitehouse and Schiff in blasting Trump and EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin’s weaponization of the EPA after the Government Accountability Office’s (GAO) similar finding. Padilla and Schiff previously slammed the Trump Administration’s intent to roll back dozens of the EPA’s regulations that protect California’s air and water.
    Full text of Senator Padilla’s hold statement is available here.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Major milestone achieved in MOD submarine dismantling project

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Press release

    Major milestone achieved in MOD submarine dismantling project

    The fin of decommissioned Royal Navy submarine ‘Swiftsure’ has been successfully cut and removed.

    Decommissioned submarine ‘Swiftsure’ has its fin cut and removed. MOD Crown Copyright.

    • Defence Nuclear Enterprise successfully cuts and removes fin from decommissioned submarine, ‘Swiftsure’, at Babcock’s Rosyth facilities. 

    • Over 500 tonnes of conventional waste already removed and recycled from Swiftsure, with 90% of her total weight expected to be recycled. 

    The Defence Nuclear Enterprise’s (DNE) Submarine Dismantling Project has achieved a major milestone as it completes the fin cut and removal on the demonstrator submarine, Swiftsure.  

    She will become the first decommissioned Royal Navy submarine to be dismantled by the end of 2026, establishing a unique and world-first methodology to disposal.  

    The innovative programme of work will enable around 90% of the submarine’s structure and components to be reused or recycled, providing a safe, environmentally responsible and cost-effective solution for the recycling of the UK’s decommissioned nuclear fleet.  

    The disposal approach was supported by the results of two public consultations in 2012 and 2015 and reflects the DNE’s commitment to act as a responsible nuclear operator. 

    Lessons from Swiftsure will develop the blueprint for the recycling of the remaining decommissioned Pressurised Water Reactor 1 submarines, with high quality steel already recovered from decommissioned submarines being repurposed into components for future submarines.  

    The fin removal is part of a truly national endeavour, delivered by the DNE in collaboration with Babcock and Defence Equipment and Support’s Defence Recycling & Disposals Team (DRDT). 

    Scottish Secretary Ian Murray said: 

    National security and environmental responsibility are at the heart of our commitment to act as a responsible nuclear operator – a technology which will play a key role in the UK Royal Navy’s submarine fleet keeping us safe for years to come.  

    Just this week as part of the Strategic Defence Review, the Prime Minister came to Scotland to announce up to 12 new nuclear-powered attack subs, building on the £15 billion investment set out for the UK’s sovereign nuclear warhead programme.

    Sir Chris Gardner KBE, CEO of the Submarine Delivery Agency, said:

    To see the fin of Swiftsure removed is a significant marker of progress in the Defence Nuclear Enterprise’s Submarine Dismantling Project. Our colleagues continue to work tirelessly alongside our industry partners in Rosyth to deliver a proven dismantling method using this demonstrator vessel. My thanks go to everyone involved in this groundbreaking work.

    Lorraine Russell, Senior Responsible Owner for the Submarine Disposals Programme, said:

    The Project showcases our commitment to sustainable disposal practices. By recycling materials wherever possible, we’re ensuring these vessels that served the nation so well continue to provide value even after decommissioning.

    Alistair Hughes, Head of DRDT, DE&S said:

    This sustainable solution has shown how we can extract the maximum value from surplus assets and improve Defence’s supply-chain resilience, while ensuring national security and prosperity remains at the core of what we do.

    The project has also provided valuable hands-on experience for the next generation of nuclear industry professionals. The Submarine Dismantling Project supports 200 highly-skilled jobs in Rosyth and remains on schedule to dismantle Swiftsure by the end of 2026, fulfilling the Department’s 2019 commitment to the Public Accounts Committee.

    Updates to this page

    Published 4 June 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Education Secretary’s speech on attendance at regional conference

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Speech

    Education Secretary’s speech on attendance at regional conference

    The Education Secretary addresses 200 education leaders from the Midlands on our mission to drive up school attendance.

    Good morning, everyone, and thank you so much for being here.  

    And thank you to Carol and the DfE team for your hard work to bring us all together. 

    It’s great to see you gathered here today.  

    I know we’ve all come for the same reason.  

    And it’s not for the chance to check out this great football stadium and imagine what could have been had we not got into education. 

    We’re all here today because we care deeply about the children of this country. 

    Their education, their lives, their futures. 

    They are at the centre of your schools, and they are at the centre of what this government wants to achieve. 

    And as Secretary of State for Education, my time, my energy, my ideas, my drive, my passion – it all belongs to them, the children of this country. 

    Not just some children, all children. 

    That’s my vision for education: 

    Excellence – for every child. 

    High and rising standards – for every child. 

    Opportunity – for every child. 

    In practice, that means four things.  

    It starts with you, great leaders, and all you do to empower our great teachers. 

    Because you know the importance of top-class teaching. 

    You understand how it can transform young lives.  

    So great teachers and great leaders are the first step – they are always the first step when it comes to learning. 

    The second step is what they teach – the curriculum.  

    And you’ll know that our curriculum and assessment review is working hard on that right now. 

    We’ll bring in a curriculum that is broad and deep and rich – ready to set children up for the future.  

    The next step is building a self-improving system. How you as leaders and we as government combine to deliver better life chances for children. 

    Those are three big steps, but it’s the fourth and final one that we’re focusing on today – breaking down the barriers to learning. 

    And in particular: attendance. 

    It’s fundamental.  

    Children can’t benefit from fantastic teachers if they’re not in school. 

    They can’t benefit from a cutting-edge curriculum if they’re not in school. 

    They can’t benefit from your hard work, or from everything this government is doing, if they’re not in school. 

    We all know why that matters. Why at times it’s so frustrating. 

    It’s at the root of what motivates me, what lifts me up and pushes me out the front door every morning.  

    Because across this country, in our towns and cities, in our classrooms and playgrounds, we still see the weight of background hold so many children back. 

    Children from certain parts of the country, children growing up in poverty, children with special educational needs. 

    And we must recognise that absence is at the centre of their stories. 

    It takes those early gaps that show up between children – and it crowbars them further apart. 

    I’ve seen it happen – and I know you have too. 

    When I was a child, skipping school was never an option.  

    My mam saw that I went off to school every day – and that was the end of it.  

    My schools were places I wanted to be. I had teachers who made me feel like I belonged in their classroom.  

    And so even on those grey and drizzly mornings – off to school I went, because that was the place for me. 

    But there were children on my street who weren’t so lucky. 

    They started by missing a day here or there. Testing the boundaries. 

    And when nobody stopped them, that day here or there turned into a day a fortnight, a day a week, until suddenly they were out of school more than they were in school. 

    I’d see them hanging around the park, or outside the corner shop – but rarely in the classroom. 

    I saw that process play out time and again – and I saw the damage it did. 

    I saw how it held children back from becoming all that they could be. 

    You’ll have seen it too. 

    And it’s this time of year when the effects become clear. 

    Because we meet today in the middle of exam season.  

    Children all over the country are squeezing in some last-minute revision. 

    But as education leaders, you’ll all know – the key to exam success is not cramming but consistency. 

    It’s the hard work – from days into weeks, weeks into months, months into years – that’s the foundation for success in exams.  

    And we build that foundation for our children through attendance. 

    Children in school, day in, day out.  

    So the smiles on results day in August – they are built on consistently showing up for school from September to July.  

    We know that, there’s solid data behind it, but I’m sure you all see it across your schools and in your trusts and local authorities: top class attendance leads to top class exam results. 

    But you’ll also know that there will be children in August, standing on the steps in front of your schools, not smiling but frowning. 

    Who feel the sting of disappointment when they open their envelopes.  

    Children who were held back from doing their best because they just weren’t in school enough this year, or last year, or the years before that. 

    Because those missed days – they may have felt harmless at the time – but they add up.  

    And children carry that extra weight with them into the exam room, and on into life beyond school. 

    The truth is that this is happening to far too many children. 

    This morning, children across the country are taking GCSE maths exams, so I’ll sprinkle some statistics into my speech today. 

    This statistic should shock us all. 

    1 in 5 children are persistently absent from our schools. 

    That’s 1.5 million, missing roughly a day every other week. 

    1.5 million. This isn’t a side issue, it’s not a niche problem to talk about in between the big education conversations.  

    This is the big education conversation. 

    Getting children back in school every day, back learning every day, back building towards a brighter future every day.  

    That’s the challenge for me, for you, for parents, for everyone in this room, for anyone across the country who cares about our children’s futures. 

    On that, I’m incredibly ambitious. 

    And since we’re meeting here at Villa Park, I hope you’ll allow me one or two football analogies, especially as my private secretary James, who is with me today, is a lifelong Aston Villa fan. 

    James tells me that since Villa were promoted from the Championship to the Premier League in 2019,  attendance at matches here in this stadium, as a percentage of max capacity, has gone from the mid-70s to the high-90s. 

    Only 2 or 3 seats in every hundred sitting empty on match day. 

    I want to see the same in our schools. And then I want to see even better. 

    We need to go from Championship to Premier League. 

    And the way we do that is by each recognising our joint responsibility to our children. 

    Government, schools, parents – working together to get children back in the classroom. 

    Parents have the responsibility to send their children to school. Of course they do.  

    But what schools do matters too. We can see it in the data. 

    Because within local authorities or trusts – there are similar schools, facing similar challenges, but with very different records on attendance. 

    Some doing really well. But in others we need to see more progress. 

    About two thirds of the difference can be explained by things like where the schools are and the communities they serve.  

    And I’m sure a bit reflects the complexities of schooling that we just can’t measure. 

    But there is a chunk, a big chunk, that is under the control of school leaders. 

    The data is clear – your leadership matters.  

    And we’re arming you with that data. You now have access to AI-powered reports for each of your schools. 

    You can see how each school’s performance compares with 20 similar schools.  

    As well as tailored tips for how to get attendance moving again. 

    And I’m pleased to say reports at trust and local authority level will be available soon. 

    Because that’s where you as system leaders come in, where you can think strategically across your schools. 

    On resourcing. 

    On accountability. 

    On data. 

    You can make a big difference on attendance, you can make a big difference in the lives of those absent children. 

    And as far as I’m concerned, that’s not just an opportunity, it’s a responsibility – one that I sincerely hope you can live up to. 

    So think about what more your schools can do to reach that child who misses too many Monday mornings.  

    What more your schools can do to work with those parents who don’t yet see the importance of attendance. 

    What more your schools can do to make sure every child knows they belong in the classroom. 

    We as government are right here with you – we are determined to do more to support you, determined that you as leaders have what you need to get the job done. 

    Just in the last few weeks we’ve improved our data tools for you.  

    These tools are now harnessing the power of AI to help you quickly identify and address problems as they arise. 

    We’ve also given secondary schools year 6 transition data – because we know, and you do too, that the jump from one school to the next is a key moment for attendance.  

    Giving you the right data means you can support the right children sooner. 

    But we’re going further to give you what you need. 

    We’re launching up to 90 new RISE Attendance and Behaviour Hubs.  

    These will be specially appointed schools.  

    They’ll work hand in hand with up to 500 schools with the most complex challenges. 

    And they’ll lead regional networks – for schools to come together, to share what works, and to learn from each other. 

    We’re also boosting funding by up to £49 million to give mental health support to 900,000 more young people in schools this year. 

    And we’re rolling out school-based nurseries and free breakfast clubs in our primary schools – teaching children from an early age that school is where they belong. 

    Attendance is a generational challenge. This will take grit, it will take graft, and it will take persistence – not for weeks or months but for years.  

    I know you don’t shy away from a challenge when it comes to the futures of our children. 

    You’ve faced huge challenges before, the covid pandemic is just one example.    

    You’ve come out fighting, and you’ve delivered – time and again. 

    And your hard work to get children back in the classroom is beginning to turn the tide. 

    Here’s another statistic – one I’m deeply proud of and you should be to: our children have spent 3 million more days in the classroom this year than last. 

    3 million – what a turn around.  

    So thank you, from the bottom of my heart, for all you’ve done to get attendance back moving in the right direction.  

    I can assure you, that hard work will make such a difference to all those children.  

    To the jobs they go on to get,  

    to the pay they go on to earn,  

    to the lives they go on to live. 

    But we can’t stop here. This isn’t the end of our journey on attendance. It’s just the beginning.  

    Now is the time to kick on, now is the time to take our action to the next level. 

    So thank you for coming today,  

    thank you for your hard work,  

    and thank you for your continued commitment to getting our children back in the classroom – once and for all.

    DfE media enquiries

    Central newsdesk – for journalists 020 7783 8300

    Updates to this page

    Published 4 June 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Government funds scheme to tackle on-farm drought risk

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments 2

    Press release

    Government funds scheme to tackle on-farm drought risk

    Fully funded expert-led studies to assess water security on farms open for applications.

    The Environment Agency have launched applications for a new round of specialist water assessments today (4 June), supporting farmer groups to collaborate on drought resilience measures and delivering on the government’s commitment to food security. 

    The £1.1 million package will support 12 fresh screening studies across England, known as Local Resource Options (LROs). They will assess the strengths and weaknesses of different water management options such as multi-farm reservoirs, treated wastewater recycling systems, or collaborative irrigation networks.  

    Last year, the fund provided 106 farms with recommendations and attracted positive responses from farmer groups for helping identify risks and facilitate greater co-operation between neighbours. 

    Proposals included building rainwater storage and distribution systems for growers of soft fruits like strawberries, wetlands to recycle treated wastewater for potato farmers or shared reservoir and irrigation networks to supply crops and aid peat restoration. 

    Environment Agency estimates suggest their top recommendations could provide an additional 12 billion litres of low-cost water per year to farmers, worth £53 million. 

    Philip Duffy, Environment Agency Chief Executive said:

    Farmers say responsible access to water is vital for food production and rural economies, particularly during prolonged dry weather.  

    This scheme will help us draw up plans for on-farm water storage that work for the environment and food production.

    Daniel Zeichner, Minister for Food and Rural Affairs said:

    Every farmer knows you need water to grow. This programme supports farmers to find new ways to manage water collaboratively to protect food security, long term profitability and local communities. 

    Storing water on wet days for use during dry periods is a great way to sustainably secure our food systems and farming businesses against the threat of drought.

    Applications are open now for groups including at least two neighbouring farms and will close at 11:59 PM on 20 July 2025.  

    To apply or for further information, please visit the Environment Agency Water Hub

    Updates to this page

    Published 4 June 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI Russia: IMF Staff Completes 2025 Article IV Mission to Malawi

    Source: IMF – News in Russian

    June 4, 2025

    End-of-Mission press releases include statements of IMF staff teams that convey preliminary findings after a visit to a country. The views expressed in this statement are those of the IMF staff and do not necessarily represent the views of the IMF’s Executive Board. Based on the preliminary findings of this mission, staff will prepare a report that, subject to management approval, will be presented to the IMF’s Executive Board for discussion and decision.

    Washington, DC: An International Monetary Fund (IMF) team led by Justin Tyson visited Malawi from May 22 to June 3 to hold meetings with the Malawian authorities and other counterparts from the public and private sectors and civil society for the 2025 Article IV consultation. Discussions focused on policies to restore macroeconomic stability, and the structural reforms needed to foster strong, inclusive, and durable growth.

    Context, Macroeconomic Outlook, and Risks

    The Malawian economy has been buffeted by several shocks. Real GDP growth declined slightly to 1.8 percent in 2024 as a drought affected agricultural production, while foreign exchange and fuel shortages dampened economic activity. Over 20 percent of the population is facing high levels of food insecurity, up five percentage points over 2023. Headline inflation began easing in late-2024 and reaccelerated in early-2025 in the context of maize prices rising to historical levels, elevated money growth and an increasing official-parallel exchange rate spread.

    Fiscal and monetary policy has remained too accommodative. The FY2024/25 (April/March) fiscal balance fell short of budget targets and deteriorated relative to the previous year as revenue underperformed and expenditure ceilings were exceeded. Persistent and elevated domestic fiscal financing has fueled money growth and inflation, which in turn exerts pressure on the exchange rate. Monetary policy did not tighten sufficiently in the context of elevated government domestic borrowing. The broader reform momentum has been slowing.

    Consequently, domestic, and external imbalances worsened. The current account deficit expanded further to about 22 percent of GDP and gross reserves are critically low, pointing to an overvalued exchange rate. The official-parallel spread is wide and may reflect other factors beyond fundamentals. Malawi remains in external debt distress and domestic debt is growing.

    The macroeconomic outlook is subdued and dependent on the agricultural sector output and foreign grant support. Under current policies, the mission expects real GDP growth to be 2.4 percent in 2025 and gradually increase to 3.4 percent over the medium term. Inflation is projected to average 29 percent in 2025 and settle at around 14 percent over the medium term. The current account deficit is projected to improve to about 17 percent of GDP in 2025 based on lower fuel prices and a rebound in key exports. General elections, scheduled for September, have reinforced political-economy constraints to macroeconomic adjustment. After the expiry of the ECF arrangement, the Malawian authorities are designing a homegrown reform program.

    Risks are tilted to the downside. Lower-than-anticipated grant inflows and food production, additional global trade tensions, and delayed reforms could deepen macroeconomic instability. Greater-than-expected mining investment and production constitute an upside risk.

    Fiscal Policy

    Returning to a sustainable fiscal adjustment path is a priority. Tackling the rising interest bill will create space for domestically-financed investment and pro-poor spending, while also ameliorating the sovereign-bank nexus.

    Domestic revenue mobilization is urgently needed to achieve fiscal sustainability in an equitable way. This could be achieved through a combination of broadening the tax base and tax policy instruments (e.g., reducing exemptions, and personal and corporate income tax reform). Improving wage bill efficiency and rebalancing expenditures towards human capital and social protection could support these efforts.

    Staff welcomes public financial management improvements, which remain critical for strengthening fiscal governance and building public trust. The authorities have made progress in expanding the coverage of the Integrated Financial Management and Information System (IFMIS), bank reconciliations, and increasing the efficiency of public investment. Reform efforts should continue to, inter alia, enhance budget development, execution, and reporting, improve the procurement system, and strengthen State Owned Enterprises (SOE) oversight.

    Decisive steps are needed to restore debt sustainability. The authorities have achieved some progress with their bilateral creditors and continue to engage with their external commercial creditors to ensure that external debt is sustainable. Tangible progress on external debt restructuring could pave the way for new concessional inflows. This should be supported by steps to reduce the cost of domestic borrowing.

    Price Stability and Exchange Rate Policy

    Tighter fiscal and monetary policies would support disinflationary efforts and ease pressure on the exchange rate. High inflation hurts the economy in general, but especially the poorest and most vulnerable. A combination of more restrictive monetary policy and an urgent fiscal adjustment, including enhanced reporting on budget execution, could reduce broad money growth, support policy credibility and re-anchor inflation expectations. Structural constraints may also be contributing to entrenched inflation expectations.

    A unified and market clearing exchange rate is critical to reducing imbalances and supporting the authorities’ growth objectives. The current regime with a large and volatile spread between the parallel and official rate creates distortions, impedes exports, subsidizes some imports, and encourages informality and tax avoidance. Foreign direct investments and official aid flows are discouraged, and domestic revenues reduced. Eliminating these imbalances requires unifying the official and parallel exchange rates, at a level reflecting fundamentals and discounting speculative factors, and stabilizing the foreign exchange market. Consistency between the de facto exchange rate regime, the monetary policy framework and fiscal policy are needed to ensure sustainable growth.

    Financial Sector Policies

    The banking sector’s credit and foreign exchange risks should be monitored to preserve financial stability. While the sector is well-capitalized, liquid, and profitable, its significant exposure to government borrowing and the net foreign liabilities position within the banking sector require continued careful monitoring.

    Increased banking sector credit to the private sector would support economic growth. Fiscal adjustment would reduce crowding out of private sector due to public borrowing and support export-oriented investment. In addition, a lower inflation and interest rate environment would further support credit to businesses.

    Structural Reforms

    Improving the investment climate would help attract investment, diversify the economy, and move up the value chain. Sustained multi-year prudent fiscal policies and removing price distortions (e.g., re-activating the automatic fuel price mechanism) would bolster policy credibility and strengthen external competitiveness. Addressing key structural impediments to growth would durably support efforts to raise productive capacity, reduce inflation and improve self-sustainability, as envisaged under the authorities’ Agriculture, Tourism, Mining and Manufacturing (ATMM) policy umbrella.

    Further strengthening governance measures will support confidence in public service provision. Despite government reform efforts, including the two National Anti-Corruption Strategies, gaps persist. For example, the public procurement process and SOE operations would benefit from greater transparency and less discretionary decision-making.

    The IMF mission team thanks the Malawian authorities and all other interlocutors for the candid discussions and their hospitality.

    IMF Communications Department
    MEDIA RELATIONS

    PRESS OFFICER: Tatiana Mossot

    Phone: +1 202 623-7100Email: MEDIA@IMF.org

    https://www.imf.org/en/News/Articles/2025/06/04/pr-25175-malawi-imf-completes-2025-art-iv-mission

    MIL OSI

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI Security: DHS Unearths TSA Corruption: Sitting US Senator’s Husband Received Blanket Exemption from National Security Review After Traveling with Known or Suspected Terrorist

    Source: US Department of Homeland Security

    New Hampshire Senator Jeanne Shaheen’s Husband Traveled with a Known or Suspected Terrorist Three Times in A Single Year 

    WASHINGTON —Today, the Department of Homeland Security revealed evidence detailing the politicization of TSA’s watchlisting program under the Biden administration. Discovered documents, correspondence, and timelines clearly highlight the Biden’s inconsistent application of Silent Partners Quiet Skies and watchlisting programs, circumventing security policies to benefit politically aligned friends and family at the expense of the American people. 

    This includes William “Billy” Shaheen, spouse of fellow democrat and sitting U.S. New Hampshire Senator, Jeane Shaheen, while surveilling political opponents like Tulsi Gabbard months after.  

    After Senator Shaheen directly lobbied the former Administrator, Pekoske gave repeated, explicit direction to exclude Shaheen from the Silent Partner Quiet Skies list. Pekoske granted Billy Shaheen a blanket Silent Partners Quiet Skies exemption despite Shaheen flying with a Known or Suspected Terrorist on three occasions. 

    All the while, Tulsi Gabbard, and many other Americans, were placed on the Silent Partners’ Quiet Skies list with little to no visibility, awareness, explanation, or oversight.  

    Billy Shaheen was hardly the only high-profile individual that was placed on this exclusion list. This list also included members of foreign royal families, political elites, professional athletes, and journalists. Shaheen’s blanket exemption has since been revoked. 

    “It is clear that this program was used as a political rolodex of the Biden Administration—weaponized against its political foes and to benefit their well-heeled friends,” said Secretary Kristi Noem. “This program should have been about the equal application of security, instead it was corrupted to be about political targeting. Trump Administration will restore the integrity, privacy, and equal application of the law for all Americans, including aviation screening.” 

    For far too long, this program has yielded little to no measurable security impact and lay at the expense of the American traveler. 

    A timeline of events:

    • 07/20/2023: William “Billy” Shaheen was a TSA Random Selectee on his flights from Boston Logan International Airport (BOS, Flight #1) to Washington-Reagan International Airport (DCA) and Washington Dulles International Airport (IAD) to BOS (Flight #2). Billy Shaheen was flagged for the first time as Co-Traveler with a Known or Suspected Terrorist (KST).

    • Shortly after Billy Shaheen’s travel, Senator Shaheen’s office made an inquiry to TSA about the Senator’s husband receiving enhanced screening on these two flights.

    • 10/18/2023: Shaheen was flagged a second time as a Co-Traveler of a KST.

    • It was after this flight that Senator Shaheen made a second inquiry to TSA, via a meeting with then Administrator Pekoske, about her husband being on a watchlist. TSA did not disclose any information on watchlisting.

    • 10/20/2023: Shaheen was then approved by then Assistant Administrator for Intelligence and Analysis Nykamp (she departed TSA in March 2025), acting on then TSA Administrator Pekoske’s Authority, to be added to the Secure Flight Exclusion List.

    • This means that Shaheen was excluded from any future TSA Random Selectee designation, and Rules-based Selectee designation, such as Quiet Skies, Association Based Rule Selectee designation, or Silent Partner Selectee designation.

    • 10/24/2023: TSA Legislative Affairs communicates with then Assistant Administrator for Intelligence and Analysis Nykamp, and refers to the action taken by Nykamp and/or Pekoske to add Shaheen to the Secure Flight Exclusion List.

    • Follow on communication provide instructions to TSA Security Operations to ensure the exclusion is accurately captured in the passenger’s boarding pass status.

    • Billy Shaheen stayed on the Secure Flight Exclusion List for 18 months until current TSA leadership removed him.

    ###

    MIL Security OSI

  • Empowering India’s Youth: A Decade of Progress and Promise

    Source: Government of India

    Source: Government of India (4)

    Over the past eleven years, the Government of India has made significant strides in empowering the youth, recognizing them as the nation’s most valuable asset. With over 65% of its population under the age of 35, India has focused on transforming its youth into a driving force for national growth through reforms in education, skilling, employment, entrepreneurship, and sports.

    Revolutionizing Education

    With the introduction of the National Education Policy 2020, the government aims to boost the Gross Enrolment Ratio and enhance the quality of education from preschool to university level. The number of universities has nearly doubled from 760 in 2014–15 to 1,334 in 2025, alongside significant expansions in IITs, IIMs, and AIIMS.

    The number of Indian Institutes of Technology (IITs) has grown from 16 to 23, following the addition of seven new IITs over the past decade.

    The Indian Institutes of Management (IIMs) have also seen steady growth, increasing from 13 in 2014 to 21 by May 2025, reflecting a broader push to strengthen management education across the country.

    In the medical education sector, the transformation has been even more striking. The number of All India Institutes of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) has more than tripled—from 7 in 2014 to 23. Medical colleges across the nation have surged from 387 to 2,045, now offering over 1.9 lakh medical seats as of 2024.

    Skilling for the Future

    Initiatives like PM Kaushal Vikas Yojana have trained over 1.63 crore youth in industry-relevant skills. The job-readiness of graduating students has seen a sharp rise from 33.9% in 2014 to 51.3% in 2024.

    Expanding Employment Opportunities

    Schemes like the Rozgar Mela have distributed around 10 lakh government job appointment letters, while EPFO data shows a substantial rise in formal employment, with over 3.45 crore young subscribers added since 2020.

    Boosting Entrepreneurship

    The Startup India programme has supported over 1.6 lakh startups, generating more than 17.6 lakh jobs. Loan disbursement under MUDRA Yojana surged, with the credit limit raised to ₹20 lakh to aid small entrepreneurs.

    Building a Sporting Nation

    Through Khelo India, Target Olympic Podium Scheme (TOPS), and hosting major events like the National Games, India is nurturing world-class athletes. Notable achievements include 6 medals at the 2024 Paris Olympics and a record 29 medals at the Paralympics.

    Youth Engagement in Nation-Building

    The Agnipath scheme and the National Youth Festival 2025 have provided platforms for leadership, service, and innovation, connecting youth directly with national development goals.

    Conclusion

    India’s focused efforts over the last decade have laid a solid foundation for empowering its youth. By investing in education, skills, jobs, entrepreneurship, and sports, the government is unlocking the vast potential of young Indians to lead the country toward a prosperous and developed future.

  • MIL-OSI China: Ecological compensation mechanism for Yangtze, Yellow rivers slated for 2027 completion

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    Ecological compensation mechanism for Yangtze, Yellow rivers slated for 2027 completion

    BEIJING, June 4 — China is set to establish a unified cross-basin ecological compensation mechanism for the mainstreams of the Yangtze and Yellow rivers by 2027, as part of its broader efforts to improve water environment management, the Ministry of Finance announced on Wednesday.

    According to a plan jointly issued by the ministry and four other government departments, the mechanism will expand to cover the mainstreams and major tributaries of key river basins, including the Yangtze and Yellow rivers, by 2035.

    The system will feature diversified compensation measures, flexible approaches, refined standards and a mature operational framework.

    China’s central fiscal authorities will play a coordinating and guiding role in implementing this mechanism — ensuring that compensation indicators and funding scales align with the water ecological conservation situation while remaining fiscally sustainable for local governments.

    China first introduced plans for Yangtze and Yellow river compensation mechanisms in 2021 and 2020, respectively. Since then, the country has made significant progress in terms of ecological conservation and restoration of these rivers.

    For example, the Yangtze River basin has seen a recovery in aquatic biodiversity following the imposition of a 10-year fishing ban in 2020. According to the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, 344 native fish species were recorded in the river from 2021 to 2024 — an increase of 36 species compared to the 2017-2020 period before the ban took effect.

    Meanwhile, the Yellow River, China’s second-longest waterway, has also experienced steady ecological improvements, including enhanced water security and environmental quality.

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI Global: Development finance in a post-aid world: the case for country platforms

    Source: The Conversation – Africa – By Richard Calland, Emeritus Associate Professor in Public Law, UCT. Visiting Adjunct Professor, WITS School of Governance; Director, Africa Programme, University of Cambridge Institute for Sustainability Leadership, University of Cambridge

    With the Trump administration slashing US Agency for International Development budgets and European nations shifting overseas development aid budgets to bolster defence spending, the world has entered a “post-aid era”.

    But there is an opportunity to recast development finance as strategic investment: “country platforms”.

    Country platforms are government-led, nationally owned mechanisms that bring together a country’s climate priorities, investment needs and reform agenda, and align them with the interests of development partners, private investors and implementing agencies. They function as a strategic hub: convening actors, coordinating funding, and curating pipelines of projects for investment.

    Think of them as the opposite of donor-driven fragmentation. Instead of dozens of disconnected projects driven by external priorities, a country platform enables governments to set the agenda and direct finance to where it is needed most. That could be renewable energy, climate-smart agriculture, resilient infrastructure, or nature-based solutions.

    Country platforms are a current fad. They were the talk of the town at the 2025 Spring meetings of multilateral development banks in Washington DC. Will they quickly fade as the next big new idea comes into view? Or can they escape the limitations and failings of the finance and development aid ecosystem?

    The Independent High Level Expert Group on Climate Finance, on which I serve, is striving to find new ways to ramp up finance – both public and private – in quality and quantity. I agree with those who argue that country platforms could be the innovation that unlocks the capital urgently needed to tackle climate overshoot and buttress economic development.

    The model is already being tested. More than ten countries have launched their platforms, and more are in the pipeline.

    For African countries, the opportunity could not be more timely. African governments are racing to deliver their Nationally Determined Contributions. These are the commitments they’ve made to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions as part of climate change mitigation targets set out in the Paris Agreement. Implementing these plans is often being done under severe fiscal constraints.

    At the same time global capital is looking for investment opportunities. But it needs to be convinced that the rewards will outweigh the risks.

    Where it’s being tested

    In Africa, South Africa’s Just Energy Transition Partnership has demonstrated both the potential and the complexity of a country platform. Egypt and Senegal also have country platforms at different stages of implementation. Kenya and Nigeria are exploring similar mechanisms. The African Union’s Climate Change and Resilient Development Strategy calls for country platforms across the continent.

    New entrants can learn from countries that started first.

    But country platforms come in different shapes and sizes according to the context.

    Another promising example is emerging through Mission 300, an initiative of the World Bank and African Development Bank, working with partners like The Rockefeller Foundation, Global Energy Alliance for People and Planet, and Sustainable Energy for All. It aims to connect 300 million people to clean electricity by 2030.

    Central to this initiative are Compact Delivery and Monitoring Units. These are essentially country platforms anchored in electrification. They reflect how a well-structured country platform can make an impact. Twelve African countries are already moving in this direction. All announced their Mission 300 compacts at the Africa Heads of State Summit in Tanzania.

    This growing cohort reflects a continental commitment to putting energy-driven country platforms at the heart of Africa’s development architecture.

    Why now – and why Africa?

    A well-functioning country platform can help in a number of ways.

    Firstly, it can give the political and economic leadership a clear goal. The platform can survive elections and show stability, certainty and transparency to the investment world.

    Secondly, national ownership and strategic alignment can reduce risk and build confidence. That would encourage investment.

    Thirdly, it builds trust among development partners and investors through clear priorities, transparency, and national ownership.

    Fourthly, it moves beyond isolated pilot projects to system-level transformation – meaning structural change. The transition in one sector, energy for example, creates new value chains that create more, better and safer jobs. Country platforms put African governments in charge of their own economic development, not as passive recipients of climate finance.

    The country sets its investment priorities and then the match-making with international climate finance can begin.

    Making it work: what’s needed

    Developing the data on which a country bases its investment and development plans, and blending those with the fiscal, climate and nature data, is complex. For this reason country platforms require investment in institutional capacity, cross-ministerial collaboration, and strong coordination between finance ministries, environment agencies and economic planners. And especially, in leadership capability.

    African countries must take charge of this capacity and capability acceleration.

    Second, development partners can respond by providing money as well as supporting African leadership, aligning with national strategies, and being willing to co-design mechanisms that meet both investor expectations and local realities.

    Capacity is especially crucial given the scale of Africa’s needs. According to the African Development Bank, Africa will require over US$200 billion annually by 2030 to meet its climate goals. Donor aid will provide only a fraction of this. It will require smart, coordinated investment and careful debt management. Country platforms provide the structure to govern the process.

    Seizing the opportunity

    Country platforms represent one of the most promising innovations in climate and development finance architecture. Properly designed and led, they offer African countries the opportunity to take ownership of their climate and development futures – on their own terms.

    Country platforms could be the “buckle” that finally enables the supply and demand sides of climate finance to come together. It will require commitment, strategic and technical capability, and, above all, smart leadership.

    Richard Calland works for the University of Cambridge Institute for Sustainability Leadership. He is also an Emeritus Associate Professor at the University of Cape Town and an Adjunct Visiting Professor at the University of Witwatersrand School of Governance. He serves on the Advisory Council of the Council for the Advancement of the South African Constitution, Chairs of the Board of Sustainability Education and is a member of the Board of Chapter Zero Southern Africa.

    ref. Development finance in a post-aid world: the case for country platforms – https://theconversation.com/development-finance-in-a-post-aid-world-the-case-for-country-platforms-257994

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI USA: Rep. Becca Balint Calls Out DHS Lack of Accountability for Mahdawi Kidnapping

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congresswoman Becca Balint (VT-AL)

    “We need answers and accountability for the illegal kidnappings, disappearances and intimidation carried out by Noem and the Trump administration. While not surprising, I’m deeply disturbed that Secretary Noem not only takes no responsibility for these illegal kidnappings, she continues to take pride in them.”

    Today, Rep. Becca Balint (VT-AL) reacts to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) response to her inquiry on Mohsen Mahdawi’s arrest and detention. Last Friday, Rep. Balint’s office received the following response from Secretary Noem: 

    “Thank you for your April 16, 2025, letter to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). 

    “The information requested in your letter is currently the subject of active litigation. Accordingly, DHS declines to comment on such matters.” 

    In April, in response to Mr. Mahdawi’s arrest, Rep. Balint and 67 other House Democrats demanded the Administration’s alleged reason for his arrest from Secretaries Rubio and Noem and received no response. On April 30th, Mr. Mahdawi was released on bail following a decision from Judge Geoffrey Crawford. 

    “We need answers and accountability for the illegal kidnappings, disappearances and intimidation carried out by Noem and the Trump administration,” said Rep. Becca Balint. “While not surprising, I’m deeply disturbed that Secretary Noem not only takes no responsibility for these illegal kidnappings, she continues to take pride in them. The fear of being ripped off the streets by masked agents when you show up to work or a citizenship appointment does not make our communities safer. I’m relieved that Mr. Mahdawi has been released and was able to graduate college, but his arrest should terrify us all. Under Trump, ICE and DHS have become a means to carry out political arrests and silence those who disagree with his authoritarian agenda. I’ll continue to demand accountability and justice for everyone in this country, including Mahmoud Khalil and others still being held unjustly.”

    ###

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Africa: Development finance in a post-aid world: the case for country platforms

    Source: The Conversation – Africa – By Richard Calland, Emeritus Associate Professor in Public Law, UCT. Visiting Adjunct Professor, WITS School of Governance; Director, Africa Programme, University of Cambridge Institute for Sustainability Leadership, University of Cambridge

    With the Trump administration slashing US Agency for International Development budgets and European nations shifting overseas development aid budgets to bolster defence spending, the world has entered a “post-aid era”.

    But there is an opportunity to recast development finance as strategic investment: “country platforms”.

    Country platforms are government-led, nationally owned mechanisms that bring together a country’s climate priorities, investment needs and reform agenda, and align them with the interests of development partners, private investors and implementing agencies. They function as a strategic hub: convening actors, coordinating funding, and curating pipelines of projects for investment.

    Think of them as the opposite of donor-driven fragmentation. Instead of dozens of disconnected projects driven by external priorities, a country platform enables governments to set the agenda and direct finance to where it is needed most. That could be renewable energy, climate-smart agriculture, resilient infrastructure, or nature-based solutions.

    Country platforms are a current fad. They were the talk of the town at the 2025 Spring meetings of multilateral development banks in Washington DC. Will they quickly fade as the next big new idea comes into view? Or can they escape the limitations and failings of the finance and development aid ecosystem?

    The Independent High Level Expert Group on Climate Finance, on which I serve, is striving to find new ways to ramp up finance – both public and private – in quality and quantity. I agree with those who argue that country platforms could be the innovation that unlocks the capital urgently needed to tackle climate overshoot and buttress economic development.

    The model is already being tested. More than ten countries have launched their platforms, and more are in the pipeline.

    For African countries, the opportunity could not be more timely. African governments are racing to deliver their Nationally Determined Contributions. These are the commitments they’ve made to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions as part of climate change mitigation targets set out in the Paris Agreement. Implementing these plans is often being done under severe fiscal constraints.

    At the same time global capital is looking for investment opportunities. But it needs to be convinced that the rewards will outweigh the risks.

    Where it’s being tested

    In Africa, South Africa’s Just Energy Transition Partnership has demonstrated both the potential and the complexity of a country platform. Egypt and Senegal also have country platforms at different stages of implementation. Kenya and Nigeria are exploring similar mechanisms. The African Union’s Climate Change and Resilient Development Strategy calls for country platforms across the continent.

    New entrants can learn from countries that started first.

    But country platforms come in different shapes and sizes according to the context.

    Another promising example is emerging through Mission 300, an initiative of the World Bank and African Development Bank, working with partners like The Rockefeller Foundation, Global Energy Alliance for People and Planet, and Sustainable Energy for All. It aims to connect 300 million people to clean electricity by 2030.

    Central to this initiative are Compact Delivery and Monitoring Units. These are essentially country platforms anchored in electrification. They reflect how a well-structured country platform can make an impact. Twelve African countries are already moving in this direction. All announced their Mission 300 compacts at the Africa Heads of State Summit in Tanzania.

    This growing cohort reflects a continental commitment to putting energy-driven country platforms at the heart of Africa’s development architecture.

    Why now – and why Africa?

    A well-functioning country platform can help in a number of ways.

    Firstly, it can give the political and economic leadership a clear goal. The platform can survive elections and show stability, certainty and transparency to the investment world.

    Secondly, national ownership and strategic alignment can reduce risk and build confidence. That would encourage investment.

    Thirdly, it builds trust among development partners and investors through clear priorities, transparency, and national ownership.

    Fourthly, it moves beyond isolated pilot projects to system-level transformation – meaning structural change. The transition in one sector, energy for example, creates new value chains that create more, better and safer jobs. Country platforms put African governments in charge of their own economic development, not as passive recipients of climate finance.

    The country sets its investment priorities and then the match-making with international climate finance can begin.

    Making it work: what’s needed

    Developing the data on which a country bases its investment and development plans, and blending those with the fiscal, climate and nature data, is complex. For this reason country platforms require investment in institutional capacity, cross-ministerial collaboration, and strong coordination between finance ministries, environment agencies and economic planners. And especially, in leadership capability.

    African countries must take charge of this capacity and capability acceleration.

    Second, development partners can respond by providing money as well as supporting African leadership, aligning with national strategies, and being willing to co-design mechanisms that meet both investor expectations and local realities.

    Capacity is especially crucial given the scale of Africa’s needs. According to the African Development Bank, Africa will require over US$200 billion annually by 2030 to meet its climate goals. Donor aid will provide only a fraction of this. It will require smart, coordinated investment and careful debt management. Country platforms provide the structure to govern the process.

    Seizing the opportunity

    Country platforms represent one of the most promising innovations in climate and development finance architecture. Properly designed and led, they offer African countries the opportunity to take ownership of their climate and development futures – on their own terms.

    Country platforms could be the “buckle” that finally enables the supply and demand sides of climate finance to come together. It will require commitment, strategic and technical capability, and, above all, smart leadership.

    – Development finance in a post-aid world: the case for country platforms
    – https://theconversation.com/development-finance-in-a-post-aid-world-the-case-for-country-platforms-257994

    MIL OSI Africa

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Gaza: Minister for the Middle East statement, 4 June 2025

    Source: United Kingdom – Government Statements

    Oral statement to Parliament

    Gaza: Minister for the Middle East statement, 4 June 2025

    Minister for the Middle East Hamish Falconer made a statement to the House of Commons on Gaza.

    Madam Deputy Speaker,

    We are appalled by repeated reports of mass casualty incidents, in which Palestinians have been killed when trying to access aid sites in Gaza. 

    Desperate civilians who have endured 20 months of war should never face the risk of death or injury to simply feed themselves and their families.

    We call for an immediate and independent investigation into these events, and for the perpetrators to be held to account.

    It is deeply disturbing that these incidents happened near the new Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) distribution sites.  

    They highlight the utterly desperate need to get aid in. 

    The Israeli Government says it has opened up aid access with its new system. 

    But the warnings raised by the United Kingdom, the United Nations, aid partners and the international community about these operations have materialised and the results are agonising.

    Israel’s newly introduced measures for aid delivery are inhumane, foster desperation and endanger civilians. 

    Israel’s unjustified block on aid into Gaza needs to end. It is inhumane. 

    Israel must immediately allow the UN and aid partners to safely deliver all types of aid at scale to save lives, reduce suffering and maintain dignity. It must ensure food and other critical supplies can reach people safely where they are across the whole of the Gaza Strip. Civilians, medical and humanitarian workers and facilities must be protected.  

    We will continue to be steadfast in our support for the UN and other trusted INGOs as the most effective and principled partners for aid delivery. 

    Our support has meant over 465,000 people have received essential healthcare, 640,000 have received food, and 275,000 people have improved access to water, sanitation and hygiene services.

     Just two weeks ago, my honourable friend, the Minister for Development, announced £4m additional funding to support the British Red Cross, enabling the delivery humanitarian relief in Gaza through their partner the Palestinian Red Crescent. Th was part of our wider £101m support package for this financial year. Aid must be allowed in so this support can continue. 

    Today, the UN Security Council is expected to consider a resolution for an immediate ceasefire, the release of all the hostages and the lifting of all Israeli restrictions on humanitarian aid, and supporting delivery by the UN.  

    And we will once again use our vote in support of these goals.  

    Following our leadership in coordinating dozens of countries to address the humanitarian situation, the joint statement from the UK, France and Canada, as well as the actions announced by my Right Honourable Friend the Foreign Secretary on 20 May, we will continue to convene international partners to increase the pressure and take further steps to address the catastrophic situation on the ground.  

    We will continue to strongly support the efforts led by the United States, Qatar and Egypt to secure an immediate ceasefire in Gaza. As the Prime Minister has said, a ceasefire is the best way to secure the release of all remaining hostages and achieve a long-term political solution. 

    This Israeli Government’s decision to expand its military operations in Gaza and severely restrict aid undermine all these goals. 

    Madam Deputy Speaker,

    We repeat our utter condemnation of Hamas, our demand that it releases all the hostages immediately and unconditionally. They can have no role in the future governance of Gaza. 

    A two-state solution is the only way to bring the long-lasting peace, stability and security that both Israelis and Palestinians deserve. We welcome France and Saudi Arabia’s leadership in chairing an international conference later this month.

    I commend this statement to the House.

    Updates to this page

    Published 4 June 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Presiding Officer must speak up for human rights and democracy

    Source: Scottish Greens

    The Presiding Officer’s meeting with the Consul General takes place on the 36th anniversary of the Tiananmen Square massacre.

    The Presiding Officer of the Scottish Parliament must raise vital issues of democracy and human rights with the Chinese consul general at a meeting on Wednesday, Scottish Greens Co-Leader Patrick Harvie MSP has made clear in a letter to the Presiding Officer. 

    The meeting between the Presiding Officer and the Consul General takes place on the 36th anniversary of the Tiananmen Square massacre, where hundreds of protesters were murdered, and thousands injured or arrested by the Chinese military.

    The Scottish Parliament has a history of supporting democracy and human rights around the world and in China.

    In the letter to the Presiding Officer Mr Harvie said:

    “Holding such meetings is of course consistent with your role, under standing order 3.1(d), to represent the Parliament in discussions and exchanges with external bodies including overseas governments. From time to time this will involve meetings with non-democratic regimes including those with extremely troubling human rights records. 

    “Where such meetings are required, I would trust that the human rights issues are always addressed directly in discussions. This is not only important in relation to inter-governmental meetings; as a democratic body it is important that the Parliament itself speaks up for democratic values, especially when meeting with regimes which suppress pro-democracy movements.

    “Additionally, in this particular instance I am sure you will also be aware that today is the anniversary of the anti-democratic violence generally known as the Tiananmen Square massacre. I was extremely surprised that this particular meeting should have been timed to coincide with the anniversary of such a violent assault against pro-democracy campaigners.”

    Mr Harvie added:

    “I am asking for your assurance that you have made clear, or that you will make clear, to the Consul General the Scottish Parliament’s commitment to human rights and democracy, and the international community’s longstanding call for a re-evaluation of the Chinese Government’s position on the use of excessive and lethal force against legitimate protest on June 4th 1989, including justice for the perpetrators and reparations for the victims.”

    Text of letter to Presiding Officer from Patrick Harvie MSP

    Dear Presiding Officer,

    I note the following entry in the regular list of IRO supported inward visits:
    Wednesday 4 June: Consul General of China, meeting with Presiding Officer

    Holding such meetings is of course consistent with your role, under standing order 3.1(d), to represent the Parliament in discussions and exchanges with external bodies including overseas governments. From time to time this will involve meetings with non-democratic regimes including those with extremely troubling human rights records. Where such meetings are required, I would trust that the human rights issues are always addressed directly in discussions. This is not only important in relation to inter-governmental meetings; as a democratic body it is important that the Parliament itself speaks up for democratic values, especially when meeting with regimes which suppress pro-democracy movements.

    Additionally, in this particular instance I am sure you will also be aware that today is the anniversary of the anti-democratic violence generally known as the Tiananmen Square massacre. I was extremely surprised that this particular meeting should have been timed to coincide with the anniversary of such a violent assault against pro-democracy campaigners.

    At this point I do not know whether the meeting has already taken place or is due later today. In either case, I am asking for your assurance that you have made clear, or that you will make clear, to the Consul General the Scottish Parliament’s commitment to human rights and democracy, and the international community’s longstanding call for a re-evaluation of the Chinese Government’s position on the use of excessive and lethal force against legitimate protest on June 4th 1989, including justice for the perpetrators and reparations for the victims.

    Kind regards,
    Patrick Harvie

     

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI Global: Extreme weather’s true damage cost is often a mystery – that’s a problem for understanding storm risk, but it can be fixed

    Source: The Conversation – USA – By John Nielsen-Gammon, Regents Professor of Atmospheric Sciences, Texas A&M University

    Hail can be destructive, yet the cost of the damage often isn’t publicly tracked. NOAA/NSSL

    On Jan. 5, 2025, at about 2:35 in the afternoon, the first severe hailstorm of the season dropped quarter-size hail in Chatham, Mississippi. According to the federal storm events database, there were no injuries, but it caused $10,000 in property damage.

    How do we know the storm caused $10,000 in damage? We don’t.

    That estimate is probably a best guess from someone whose primary job is weather forecasting. Yet these guesses, and thousands like them, form the foundation for publicly available tallies of the costs of severe weather.

    If the damage estimates from hailstorms are consistently lower in one county than the next, potential property buyers might think it’s because there’s less risk of hailstorms. Instead, it might just be because different people are making the estimates.

    Hail damage in Dallas in June 2012.
    Rondo Estrello/Flickr, CC BY-SA

    We are atmospheric scientists at Texas A&M University who lead the Office of the Texas State Climatologist. Through our involvement in state-level planning for weather-related disasters, we have seen county-scale patterns of storm damage over the past 20 years that just didn’t make sense. So, we decided to dig deeper.

    We looked at storm event reports for a mix of seven urban and rural counties in southeast Texas, with populations ranging from 50,000 to 5 million. We included all reported types of extreme weather. We also talked with people from the two National Weather Service offices that cover the area.

    Storm damage investigations vary widely

    Typically, two specific types of extreme weather receive special attention.

    After a tornado, the National Weather Service conducts an on-site damage survey, examining its track and destruction. That survey forms the basis for the official estimate of a tornado’s strength on the enhanced Fujita scale. Weather Service staff are able to make decent damage cost estimates from knowledge of home values in the area.

    They also investigate flash flood damage in detail, and loss information is available from the National Flood Insurance Program, the main source of flood insurance for U.S. homes.

    Tornadoes in May 2025 destroyed homes in communities in several states, including London, Ky.
    AP Photo/Timothy D. Easley

    Most other losses from extreme weather are privately insured, if they’re insured at all.

    Insured loss information is collected by reinsurance companies – the companies that insure the insurance companies – and gets tabulated for major events. Insurance companies use their own detailed information to try to make better decisions on rates than their competitors do, so event-based loss data by county from insurance companies isn’t readily available.

    Losing billion-dollar disaster data

    There’s one big window into how disaster damage has changed over the years in the U.S.

    The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, or NOAA, compiled information for major disasters, including insured losses by state. Bulk data won’t tell communities or counties about their specific risk, but it enabled NOAA to calculate overall damage estimates, which it released as its billion-dollar disasters list.

    From that program, we know that the number and cost of billion-dollar disasters in the United States has increased dramatically in recent years. News articles and even scientific papers often point to climate change as the primary culprit, but a much larger driver has been the increasing number and value of buildings and other types of infrastructure, particularly along hurricane-prone coasts.

    Critics in the past year called for more transparency and vetting of the procedures used to estimate billion-dollar disasters. But that’s not going to happen, because NOAA in May 2025 stopped making billion-dollar disaster estimates and retired its user interface.

    Previous estimates can still be retrieved from NOAA’s online data archive, but by shutting down that program, the window into current and future disaster losses and insurance claims is now closed.

    Emergency managers at the county level also make local damage estimates, but the resources they have available vary widely. They may estimate damages only when the total might be large enough to trigger a disaster declaration that makes relief funds available from the federal government.

    Patching together very rough estimates

    Without insurance data or county estimates, the local offices of the National Weather Service are on their own to estimate losses.

    There is no standard operating procedure that every office must follow. One office might choose to simply not provide damage estimates for any hailstorms because the staff doesn’t see how it could come up with accurate values. Others may make estimates, but with varying methods.

    The result is a patchwork of damage estimates. Accurate values are more likely for rare events that cause extensive damage. Loss estimates from more frequent events that don’t reach a high damage threshold are generally far less reliable.

    The number of severe hail reports in southeast Texas listed in the National Centers for Environmental Information’s storm events database is strongly correlated with population. The county with the most reports and greatest detail in those reports is home to Houston. Hailstorms in the three easternmost counties are rarely associated with damage estimates.
    John Nielsen-Gammon and B.J. Baule

    Do you want to look at local damage trends? Forget about it. For most extreme weather events, estimation methods vary over time and are not documented.

    Do you want to direct funding to help communities improve resilience to natural disasters where the need is greatest? Forget about it. The places experiencing the largest per capita damages depend not just on actual damages but on the different practices of local National Weather Service offices.

    Are you moving to a location that might be vulnerable to extreme weather? Companies are starting to provide localized risk estimates through real estate websites, but the algorithms tend to be proprietary, and there’s no independent validation.

    4 steps to improve disaster data

    We believe a few fixes could make NOAA’s storm events database and the corresponding values in the larger SHELDUS database, managed by Arizona State University, more reliable. Both databases include county-level disasters and loss estimates for some of those disasters.

    First, the National Weather Service could develop standard procedures for local offices for estimating disaster damages.

    Second, additional state support could encourage local emergency managers to make concrete damage estimates from individual events and share them with the National Weather Service. The local emergency manager generally knows the extent of damage much better than a forecaster sitting in an office a few counties away.

    Third, state or federal governments and insurance companies can agree to make public the aggregate loss information at the county level or other scale that doesn’t jeopardize the privacy of their policyholders. If all companies provide this data, there is no competitive disadvantage for doing so.

    Fourth, NOAA could create a small “tiger team” of damage specialists to make well-informed, consistent damage estimates of larger events and train local offices on how to handle the smaller stuff.

    With these processes in place, the U.S. wouldn’t need a billion-dollar disasters program anymore. We’d have reliable information on all the disasters.

    John Nielsen-Gammon receives funding from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the State of Texas.

    William Baule receives funding from NOAA, the State of Texas, & the Austin Community Foundation.

    ref. Extreme weather’s true damage cost is often a mystery – that’s a problem for understanding storm risk, but it can be fixed – https://theconversation.com/extreme-weathers-true-damage-cost-is-often-a-mystery-thats-a-problem-for-understanding-storm-risk-but-it-can-be-fixed-257105

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI Global: ‘Loyal to the oil’ – how religion and striking it rich shape Canada’s hockey fandom

    Source: The Conversation – USA – By Cody Musselman, Preceptor, College Writing Program, Harvard University

    Some Edmonton Oilers fans are pinning their Stanley Cup hopes on captain Connor McDavid. AP Photo/Rebecca Blackwell

    Déjà vu is a common occurrence in the world of sports, and the Edmonton Oilers are no strangers to repeat matchups. The Canadian team faced off against the New York Islanders in both 1983 and ’84 for hockey’s biggest prize, the Stanley Cup. In this year’s National Hockey League finals, the Oilers will try to avenge their Game 7 loss to the Florida Panthers in 2024.

    Edmontonians who have been “loyal to the oil,” as fans say, have been waiting for redemption ever since. The Trump administration’s threats toward its northern neighbor has fueled a wave of nationalism, making even more fans eager for a Canadian team to win the Stanley Cup – which has not happened since 1993. With hopes pinned to Edmonton, the finals also brings renewed attention to some of Canada’s biggest exports: hockey and oil.

    Novelist Leslie McFarlane once observed that for Canadians, “hockey is more than a game; it is almost a religion.” Prayers and superstitions abound, from wearing special clothing to fans averting their eyes during penalty shots.

    The Oilers also evoke another aspect of Canadian society that, for some, has almost religious importance: resource extraction. In American and Canadian culture, oil has long been entangled with religion. It’s a national blessing from God, in some people’s eyes, and a means to the “good life” for those who persevere to find it. For many people in communities whose economies center around resource extraction, the possibility of success is valued above its environmental risks.

    We are scholars of religion who study sports and how oil shapes society, or petro-cultures. The Edmonton Oilers showcase a worldview in which triumph, luck and rugged work pay off – beliefs at home on the ice or in the oil field. The Stanley Cup Final offers a glimpse into how the oil industry has helped shaped the religious fervor around Canada’s favorite sport.

    Edmonton Oilers fan Dale Steil’s boots before the team’s playoff game against the Los Angeles Kings on April 26, 2024.
    AP Photo/Tony Gutierrez

    Boomtown

    Edmonton is the capital of Alberta, a province known for its massive oil, gas and oil sands reserves. With five refineries producing an average of 3.8 million barrels a day, oil and gas is Alberta’s biggest industry – and a way of life.

    This is especially true in Edmonton, known as the “Oil Capital of Canada.” Here, oil not only structures the local economy, but it also shapes identities, architecture and everyday experiences.

    Visit the West Edmonton Mall, for example, and you’ll see a statue of three oil workers drilling, reminding shoppers that petroleum is the bedrock of their commerce. Visit the Canadian Energy Museum to learn how oil and gas have remade the region since the late 1940s, and glimpse items such as engraved hard hats and the “Oil Patch Kid,” a spin on the iconic “Cabbage Patch Kids” toys. Tour the Greater Edmonton area and see how pump jacks dot the horizon. Oil is everywhere, shaping futures, fortunes and possibility.

    Pump jacks near Acme, Alberta – a regular sight.
    Michael Interisano/Design Pics Editorial/Universal Images Group via Getty Images

    Set against this backdrop, the Oilers’ name is unsurprising. It is not uncommon, after all, to name teams after local industries. Football’s Pittsburgh Steelers pay homage to the steel mills that once employed much of the team’s fan base. The Tennessee Oilers were originally the Houston Oilers, prompting other Texas teams such as the XFL’s Roughnecks to follow suit. Further north, the name of basketball’s Detroit Pistons references car manufacturing.

    Teams with industry-inspired names play double duty, venerating both a place and a trade. Some fans are not only cheering for the home team, but also cheering for themselves – affirming that their industry and their labor matter.

    Ales Hemsky of the Edmonton Oilers skates out from under the oil derrick for a game at Rexall Place in 2008 in Edmonton, Alberta.
    Andy Devlin/NHLI via Getty Images

    In a TikTok video from last year’s Stanley Cups playoffs, a man overcome with joy at the Oilers’ victory over the Dallas Stars claps his hands and hops around his living room. The caption reads, “My first-generation immigrant oil rig working Filipino father who has never played a second of hockey in his life … happily cheering for the Oilers advancing in the playoffs. Better Bring that cup home for him oily boys.” He appears to be cheering for the Oilers not because they are a hockey team, but because they are an oil team.

    And indeed, the Oilers are an oily team. The Oilers’ Oilfield Network, for example, describes itself as “exclusively promot[ing] companies in the Oil and Gas industry,” allowing leaders to connect “through the power of Oilers hockey.”

    The Oilers’ connection with industry is further underscored by their logos. The current one features a simple drop of oil, but past designs featured machinery gears and an oil worker pulling a lever shaped like a hockey stick.

    Simply put, “Edmonton is all oil,” Oilers goaltender Stuart Skinner shared after defeating the Dallas Stars to win the 2025 Western Conference Final.

    Liquid gold

    There is a long tradition of pairing hockey with oil – and with Canada itself.

    After the British North America Act founded Canada in 1867, the new nation searched for a distinctive identity through sport and other cultural forms.

    Enter hockey. The winter game evolved in Canada from the Gaelic game of “shinty” and the First Nations’ game of lacrosse and soon became part of the glue holding the nation together.

    Ever since, media, politicians, sports groups and major industries have helped fuel fan fervor and promoted hockey as integral to Canada’s rugged frontiersman character.

    The Montreal Amateur Athletic Association posing with the first Stanley Cup in 1893.
    Bruce Bennett Studios via Getty Images Studios/Getty Images

    In 1936, Imperial Oil, one of Canada’s largest petroleum companies, began sponsoring Hockey Night in Canada, a national radio show that reached millions each week. Several years later, Imperial Oil played a major role in bringing the show to television, where the Imperial Oil Choir sang the theme song. Imperial Oil and its gas stations, Esso, also sponsored youth hockey programs across the nation. In 2019, Imperial inked a deal to be the NHL’s “official retail fuel” in Canada.

    Striking it rich

    Connections between hockey and industry in Alberta’s oil country aren’t just about sponsorships. Central to both cultures is the idea of luck – historically, one of the many things it takes to extract fossil fuels. “Striking it rich” in the oil fields has become entangled with the idea of divine providence, especially among the many Christian laborers.

    Philosopher Terra Schwerin Rowe has written about North America’s “petro-theology,” explaining how many perceive oil as a free-flowing gift from God meant to be taken from the Earth – if you can find it.

    A Canadian oil worker kisses his wife and daughter goodbye as he sets off to work in northern Alberta in the 1950s.
    John Chillingworth/Getty Images

    Oil represents fortune, and who wouldn’t want to borrow a bit of that for their team? Sports are thrilling because sometimes talent, team chemistry and the home-field advantage still lose to a stroke of good luck. Oil culture pairs the idea of divine favor with an insistence on rough-and-tumble endurance, similar to hockey.

    Sometimes if you don’t strike it rich the first time, you have to keep on drilling. The next well may be the one to bring wealth. Oil prospectors know this, but so do sports fans who maintain hope season to season.

    Soon fans from around the world will join Edmonton locals in rooting for the Oilers. They’ll throw their hands up in despair if captain Connor McDavid enters the “sin bin” – the penalty box – or dance in celebration to the Oilers’ theme, “La Bamba.” Some of them will be cheering, too, for oil.

    This is an updated version of an article originally published on June 19, 2024.

    The authors do not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and have disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. ‘Loyal to the oil’ – how religion and striking it rich shape Canada’s hockey fandom – https://theconversation.com/loyal-to-the-oil-how-religion-and-striking-it-rich-shape-canadas-hockey-fandom-258024

    MIL OSI – Global Reports