Category: Politics

  • MIL-OSI Global: What if Alberta really did vote to separate?

    Source: The Conversation – Canada – By Stewart Prest, Lecturer, Political Science, University of British Columbia

    Alberta Premier Danielle Smith is using sovereignty sentiments in Alberta as a kind of implied threat to get a better deal for the province.

    In a letter to Mark Carney in the run-up to the recent first ministers conference in Saskatoon, Smith told the prime minister that failure to build additional pipelines for Alberta oil would “send an unwelcome signal to Albertans concerned about Ottawa’s commitment to national unity.”

    Accordingly, it’s worth asking: what would happen if Alberta did vote to leave?

    Two historical touch points are the 1995 sovereignty referendum in Québec and the Brexit vote in the United Kingdom in 2016. In different ways, both examples drive home one inevitable point: in the event of a vote to pursue sovereignty, the future of Alberta would have to be negotiated one painful and uncertain step at a time.

    International lawlessness

    Sovereignty is an assertion of independent governmental authority, notably including a monopoly over the legitimate use of force over a defined people and territory. Unlike provinces in a country like Canada, sovereign countries co-operate with each other if — and only if — it’s in their interests to do so.

    Some proponents of separatism have argued that an independent Alberta could rely on international law to secure continued access to tidewater through Canada. The idea seems to form the basis of Smith’s assertions that one nation cannot “landlock” another under international law. But that’s not the case.

    What’s more, international law — even if it does apply in theory — doesn’t always hold in practice. That’s because between countries, formal anarchy prevails: no one has the responsibility to enforce international law on their own. If one country breaks international law, it’s up to other countries to respond. If that doesn’t happen, then it just doesn’t happen.

    Simply put, if Alberta were to leave Canada, it would lose all enforceable rights and protections offered by the Canadian Constitution and enforced by the institutions and courts. In their place, Alberta would get exactly — and only — what it can bargain for.

    The Québec example

    The Québec independence saga has in many ways clarified and refined the path to potential secession for provinces in Canada, and hints at what can happen in the aftermath of a sovereignty referendum.

    In the wake of the near miss that was the 1995 referendum — when those wanting to remain in Canada defeated those who voted to separate with the narrowest of margins — Jean Chretien’s Liberal government took rapid steps to respond.

    Plan A focused on actions aimed at addressing Québec’s grievances, not unlike Carney’s quest for a national consensus to build an additional pipeline.

    Another course of action, known as Plan B, defined the path to secession.

    The federal government asked the Supreme Court of Canada for a clarification on the legality of sovereignty. It then passed the Clarity Act, which enshrined into law Ottawa’s understanding of the court’s answer. The reference and act both made clear that any secession attempt could be triggered only by a “clear majority” on a “clear question.”

    The act also illuminated the stakes of secession. The preamble of the legislation, for instance, spells out that provincial sovereignty would mean the end of guaranteed Canadian citizenship for departing provincial residents.

    The act also lays out some of the points to be negotiated in the event of secession, “including the division of assets and liabilities, any changes to the borders of the province, the rights, interests and territorial claims of the Aboriginal peoples of Canada, and the protection of minority rights.”

    Simply put, everything would be on the table if Albertans opted to separate.

    You Brexit, you bought it

    Brexit provides an example of just how painful that process can be. After voting to leave the European Union, the U.K. found itself bogged down in a difficult negotiation process that continues to this day.

    Political, economic and trade rights — even including the border between the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland — have all been painfully reconstituted through complex negotiations. Despite the promises made by those who advocated in favour of Brexit, the U.K. will continue to pay in perpetuity for access to the limited EU services it still retains.

    The U.K. is dealing with these challenges even though it was already a sovereign state. Alberta is not. Everything between a sovereign Alberta and its neighbours would be subject to difficult negotiations, both in the initial days of an independent Albertan state and any subsequent discussions.

    Alberta would have little leverage

    Once independent, Alberta would be a landlocked, oil-exporting nation.
    It would be negotiating with Canada — and the United States, its neighbour to the south — over every aspect of its new relationship.

    Its borders with other provinces and territories would need be negotiated, as would the status of marginalized populations and Indigenous Peoples within Alberta. The status of lands subject to treaty — in other words, most of the province — would have to be negotiated.

    Indigenous Peoples themselves have already made clear they have no interest in secession and would mount a vigorous defence of Indigenous rights as they exist within Canada.

    After all, if Canada is divisible, so is Alberta. A new republic has no automatic claims to territory with respect to Indigenous Peoples and treaty lands.

    Once borders were settled, Alberta would have little leverage and would need a lot of help as a country of about 4.5 million negotiating with neighbours of 35 million in Canada and 350 million in the U.S. Who would be its allies?

    Nothing would be guaranteed, not Alberta’s admission to the United Nations, the establishment of an Albertan currency and exchange rates, national and continental defence, the management of shared borders and citizenship rules or the terms of cross-border trade and investment.

    Access to Canadian ports would be at Canada’s discretion, negotiated on terms Canada considered in its interests. Alberta could no more force a pipeline through Canada than through the United States.

    Puerto Rico North?

    Of course, a republic of Alberta would be free to pursue deeper relations with the American republic to its south. The U.S president, however, has already made clear what would be the likely terms for free trade: accession.

    Here, too, there would be no guarantees. Alberta could just as easily become an American territory, with limited representation, as it could a 51st state. “Puerto Rico North” is as possible as “Alaska South.”

    Gone too would be any claims to share collective goods. Alberta’s neighbours would have no incentive, for instance, to help with the inevitable post-oil clean-up, estimated in the hundreds of billions of dollars.

    Simply put, if Alberta were to vote to leave Canada, it would truly be on its own.

    Stewart Prest does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. What if Alberta really did vote to separate? – https://theconversation.com/what-if-alberta-really-did-vote-to-separate-257214

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI: Mine Your Way to Millions: Bitcoin Solaris Turns Your Smartphone into a Wealth-Generating Machine

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    TALLINN, Estonia, June 04, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Bitcoin Solaris (BTC-S) has announced the launch the Beta version of their new mobile-first mining solution designed to make cryptocurrency mining accessible to a global audience for a selected group of users. By leveraging the power of smartphones, BTC-S enables users to participate in mining without the need for expensive hardware or specialized technical knowledge.

    A True Shift in Wealth-Building

    Bitcoin Solaris isn’t just promising a revolution in mining—it’s delivering one. This project is built to empower ordinary users with tools that were once reserved for tech-savvy miners and institutional whales. At the heart of it all is the upcoming Solaris Nova App, a sleek cross-platform tool that allows users to mine BTC-S directly from smartphones, browsers, and desktops.

    With intuitive one-click mining, adaptive algorithms, and in-app wallets, even beginners can participate in wealth generation. What used to require thousands of dollars in hardware is now possible from your pocket. This is where Web3 meets true decentralization—through effort, not privilege.

    How Bitcoin Solaris Makes Mobile Mining Real

    Thanks to its robust architecture, BTC-S delivers mobile mining with speed, efficiency, and inclusivity. The platform is designed to remove barriers—no costly rigs, no complex setups, and no middlemen.

    Technical Innovations Powering BTC-S:

    • Dual-layer structure: The Base Layer uses PoW and PoC for decentralization and validator fairness, while the Application Layer leverages PoT and PoH for near-instant transaction finality.
    • Solaris Nova App (through the exciting release): Offers plug-and-play mining on mobile and desktop. Integrated tutorials and wallets make onboarding frictionless.
    • Mining Power Marketplace: Users can rent or sell computational power through smart contracts and performance-based payouts.
    • Device adaptability: Whether you’re using a GPU, ASIC, laptop, or smartphone, the system optimizes mining load to fit your hardware.
    • Energy efficiency: The system uses 99.95% less energy than traditional PoW blockchains, ensuring green scalability.
    • Advanced security: From biometric logins to remote wipe and encrypted mining protocols, safety is built in.

    These innovations don’t just improve accessibility—they create the foundation for consistent long-term earnings. Bitcoin Solaris transforms mining into something anyone can understand, join, and profit from.

    The Future of Decentralization Is Already Mining—Start with BTC-S

    Why the Presale Is Exploding

    The Bitcoin Solaris presale is now in Phase 6, and momentum is building fast. With only around 8 weeks left, over 11,000 users have already joined, and $1.8M+ has been raised. It’s being called one of the shortest and most explosive presales in the crypto space. Investors know what’s coming—$6 today could become $20 at launch.

    • Current Price: $6
    • Next Phase: $7
    • Launch Price: $20
    • Bonus: 10%
    • Launch Date: July 31, 2025

    Early adopters are betting big not just on price—but on usability, infrastructure, and a mining revolution.

    A Community Backed by Experts and Influencers

    BTC-S isn’t flying under the radar anymore. A wave of interest has hit the crypto scene, with influencers and analysts digging into the tech and economics of Bitcoin Solaris. One of the standout reviews came from Crypto Nitro, who broke down why the project’s mining capabilities are catching serious attention. With decentralization at its core and innovation at every layer, it’s becoming the go-to altcoin for forward-thinking investors.

    A Glimpse Into the Future: The BTC-S Roadmap

    Bitcoin Solaris isn’t a short-term play. Its long-term roadmap is designed to evolve the ecosystem far beyond launch.

    • Q2–Q4 2025: Core development, smart contracts, community building
    • Q1 2026: Wallets, testnet, dual-layer architecture optimization
    • Q2 2026: Mainnet readiness, exchange listings
    • Q3 2026: Solaris Nova full release, governance systems
    • 2027–2028: Layer-2 scaling, cross-chain bridges, and real-world partnerships with enterprises and governments

    From accessibility to adoption, Bitcoin Solaris is engineered for growth.

    Conclusion: The Wealth Revolution Starts in Your Pocket

    While the crypto world gets distracted by meme cycles and flashy headlines, a quiet revolution is brewing. Bitcoin Solaris isn’t just building a coin—it’s building a participatory ecosystem where your phone becomes your mining rig, and your effort becomes your equity.

    The upcoming Solaris Nova App and the dual-consensus engine are just the beginning. With utility, transparency, and powerful scalability at its core, BTC-S is turning smartphones into income engines—and early adopters into potential millionaires.

    The opportunity to “mine your way to millions” is no longer a fantasy. It’s a reality, and it starts with Bitcoin Solaris.

    For more information on Bitcoin Solaris:

    Website: https://www.bitcoinsolaris.com/
    Telegram: https://t.me/Bitcoinsolaris
    X: https://x.com/BitcoinSolaris

    Media Contact
    Xander Levine
    press@bitcoinsolaris.com
    Press Kit: Available upon request

    Disclaimer: This is a paid post and is provided by Bitcoin Solaris. The statements, views, and opinions expressed in this content are solely those of the content provider and do not necessarily reflect the views of this media platform or its publisher. We do not endorse, verify, or guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of any information presented. We do not guarantee any claims, statements, or promises made in this article. This content is for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial, investment, or trading advice.Investing in crypto and mining-related opportunities involves significant risks, including the potential loss of capital. It is possible to lose all your capital. These products may not be suitable for everyone, and you should ensure that you understand the risks involved. Seek independent advice if necessary. Speculate only with funds that you can afford to lose. Readers are strongly encouraged to conduct their own research and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. However, due to the inherently speculative nature of the blockchain sector—including cryptocurrency, NFTs, and mining—complete accuracy cannot always be guaranteed.Neither the media platform nor the publisher shall be held responsible for any fraudulent activities, misrepresentations, or financial losses arising from the content of this press release. In the event of any legal claims or charges against this article, we accept no liability or responsibility.Globenewswire does not endorse any content on this page.

    Legal Disclaimer: This media platform provides the content of this article on an “as-is” basis, without any warranties or representations of any kind, express or implied. We assume no responsibility for any inaccuracies, errors, or omissions. We do not assume any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information presented herein. Any concerns, complaints, or copyright issues related to this article should be directed to the content provider mentioned above.

    Photos accompanying this announcement are available at:

    https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/59042ac5-4d8d-40f4-a060-bc0457335ba7

    https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/69804242-b71a-4b26-8886-d00a32848f6c

    https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/4ee5fc19-57a7-46d6-98a1-48b396246bf4

    https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/b012faa6-7ed0-4b3e-bbf1-06343719e94f

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: ARU to take central role in boosting regional growth

    Source: Anglia Ruskin University

    Anglia Ruskin University (ARU) has become the new host institution for the Arc Universities Group (AUG) – a partnership delivering innovation, sustainability and inclusive growth across the Oxford-Cambridge corridor.

    ARU takes over from Cranfield University, which helped steer the group through its formative first six years.

    AUG is part of the Oxford-Cambridge Supercluster Board and brings together higher education institutions, industry leaders, training providers, and government bodies in Cambridgeshire, Hertfordshire, Bedfordshire, Northamptonshire and Oxfordshire.

    It is estimated that this region holds the potential to deliver a further £78billion in additional economic output and more than 400,000 new high-skilled jobs by 2050, and AUG is developing a regional Skills and Talent Strategy to help unlock its full potential, focusing on technological innovation, environmental sustainability, and creative and cultural industries.

    Professor Aled Jones, Director of ARU’s Global Sustainability Institute, will lead the environmental sustainability focus area of the new strategy, working with investors, employers and policymakers to find practical solutions to workforce challenges around sustainable growth.

    “We’re delighted to take on the hosting of AUG. It aligns perfectly with the work we’re doing across the wider region – connecting Essex and East Anglia with the innovation clusters of the Oxford-Cambridge corridor.

    “We’re committed to helping shape a skills agenda that supports inclusive growth and ensures communities across the Arc benefit from its success.”

    Professor Roderick Watkins, Vice Chancellor of Anglia Ruskin University (ARU)

    The Arc Universities Group consists of ARU, Cranfield University, University of Oxford, University of Cambridge, Oxford Brookes University, University of Northampton, University of Hertfordshire, University of Bedfordshire, Buckinghamshire New University and the Open University.

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Art Gallery displays new works by contemporary artists

    Source: Scotland – City of Aberdeen

    Five new works by six local and international contemporary artists have gone on display at Aberdeen Art Gallery. The works have been commissioned with support from the Friends of Aberdeen Archives, Gallery & Museums.  

     
    All of the new commissions respond to existing works in the collection and are on display in Gallery 1 – Collecting art. This space tells the story of how the collection has developed since its Victorian origins, and explores the Art Gallery’s commitment to collecting contemporary art through a combination of gifts, bequests, donations, purchases and commissions.  
     
    The new works are a result of two commissioning strands and the artists are: 
     
    1. Self Portrayed 
    Annalee Davis (born 1963, St Michael, Barbados) 
    Richard Macguire (born 1991, Aberdeen) 
     
    2. Micro-Commissions 
    Daisy Williamson (born 1972, North Vancouver, Canada) 
    C(U)SP: Collection of (Unfinished) Shared Projects established Aberdeen, 2019 
    Flying Lion (born Buenos Aires, Argentina, 1982) 
     
    1. Self Portrayed 
    Granite merchant and art collection Alexander Macdonald (1837-1884) was instrumental in the creation of the Art Gallery, bequeathing his impressive collection to the city. Macdonald only bought works by living artists. A selection of his collection of 93 artists’ portraits is on display in Gallery 1. It is a real-time record of some of the most successful artists of the Victorian period.  
    The Self Portrayed commission seeks to redress the historical imbalance and lack of diversity in the original Macdonald portraits. The two commissioned artists were asked to make a self-portrait that expresses the self and speaks to their overall practice.  

    Richard Maguire (born 1991, Aberdeen) is based in Aberdeen. Made in England: A View from this Side is inspired by Maguire’s ancestral heritage, with portraits of his grandfather who travelled to the UK from India, overlaid with images of Maguire as a baby. There are also images of his grandfather’s colleagues who worked on a Tuberculosis ward – doctors who migrated from India were usually given the more dangerous ward rounds. 

    Annalee Davis (born 1963, St Michael, Barbados) works primarily in textiles. Her embroidered Self-portrait contains elements that speak to the location of her studio in Barbados. Working on a dairy farm that used to be a sugar plantation in the colonial era, Davis regularly finds shards of 18th-century ceramics in the ground. These have been woven on to the surface of the work.  
     
    2. Micro-commissions 
    Works commissioned as part of the Gallery’s fifth round of annual Micro-commissions are also on display.  The programme funds artists living and working in AB postcode areas to produce new work that relates to the Aberdeen Archives, Gallery and Museums collection and explores themes of energy, environment, local economy or identity and representation. The next round of Micro-Commissions will open for submissions in July.  
     
    Penelope’s Web(b) by Daisy Williamson  
    This work is inspired by Penelope and the Suitors by John William Waterhouse, which is also on display in Gallery 1. Discovering that ‘Penelope’ was also Ancient Greek for ‘duck’, Williamson chose a print of two eider ducks as a reference for her weaving. The tapestry is partially unwoven, highlighting the impact of climate change and the connection to Penelope’s story in Homer’s The Odyssey. 
     
    Studio Spaces, Aberdeen 2024 by C(U)SP 
    This print shows examples of empty office spaces used by artists in Aberdeen. The temporary nature of these spaces contrasts with the luxurious studio accommodation of artists or earlier eras such as John Phillip, who is captured at work in a painting by John Ballantyne from the 1860s, on display in Gallery 7.  
     
    Unisus – Totem of a Change by Flying Lion 
    Unisus, a Unicorn / Pegasus hybrid creature made from solar panels, wind turbines and composting bins, sits astride the Mercat Cross, highlighting Aberdeen’s transition towards a more sustainable future.  

     
    Councillor Martin Greig, Aberdeen City Council’s culture spokesperson, said, “It’s great to see these recently-commissioned works on display. They demonstrate the Gallery’s continuing commitment to supporting contemporary artists, particularly artists living and working in the North East. I’m sure visitors will enjoy exploring the new layers of meaning and insight the commissions bring to existing works in the collection.”

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Xi Jinping Meets with President of Belarus /detailed version-1/

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: People’s Republic of China in Russian – People’s Republic of China in Russian –

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    BEIJING, June 4 (Xinhua) — Chinese President Xi Jinping met with Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko in Beijing on Wednesday. Once again congratulating Lukashenko on his re-election as president of Belarus, Xi Jinping noted that China and Belarus are true friends and good partners who have always treated each other with sincerity and trust.

    Xi Jinping noted that the traditional friendship between the two countries is growing stronger day by day, political mutual trust remains unshakable, and cooperation in all areas is advancing comprehensively. China has always viewed and developed China-Belarus relations from a strategic height and a long-term perspective, he added.

    Xi Jinping said that China is ready to work together with Belarus to promote the sustainable development of bilateral ties and mutually beneficial cooperation.

    The Chinese President stressed that the two sides should strengthen coordination and cooperation within multilateral formats such as the United Nations (UN) and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), jointly oppose despotism, hegemony and bullying, and uphold international fairness and justice.

    A. Lukashenko, in turn, noted that he was visiting China for the 15th time, adding that during each of these visits he felt a sense of deep friendship on the part of China.

    Thanking China for the enormous support and assistance it has provided to Belarus over a long period of time, A. Lukashenko stated that Belarus has a high degree of trust in China and will actively develop cooperation with it.

    China resolutely defends multilateralism and opposes unilateralism, sanctions and pressure in international affairs, setting an example for the whole world, the President of Belarus noted. He expressed deep admiration and readiness to make joint efforts with China to protect international impartiality and justice. -0-

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI Russia: South Korean President appoints prime minister and top officials

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: People’s Republic of China in Russian – People’s Republic of China in Russian –

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    SEOUL, June 4 (Xinhua) — President of the Republic of Korea (ROK) Lee Jae-myung has appointed a prime minister and senior officials after being sworn in as the country’s 21st president, the presidential office said.

    Kim Min-seok, a lawmaker from the ruling Toburo Democratic Party and co-chairman of Lee Jae-myung’s election campaign, has been nominated for the post of cabinet chief.

    The prime minister’s candidacy must be approved by the National Assembly (parliament), controlled by the Toburo Democratic Party, after appropriate hearings.

    Lee Jae-myung appointed ruling party lawmaker Kang Hoon-sik as presidential chief of staff and diplomat Wi Sung-rak, who was first elected to parliament last April from the Toburo Democratic Party, as top national security adviser to the president.

    The president also appointed former Unification Minister Lee Jong-suk as director of the National Intelligence Service.

    Lee Jae-myung was sworn in as South Korea’s new president at the National Assembly on Wednesday, officially beginning his first five-year term in office. –0–

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Xi Jinping Congratulates Lee Jae-myung on Election as President of the Republic of Korea

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: People’s Republic of China in Russian – People’s Republic of China in Russian –

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    BEIJING, June 4 (Xinhua) — Chinese President Xi Jinping on Wednesday congratulated Lee Jae-myung on his election as president of the Republic of Korea (ROK).

    Noting that China and the ROK are important close neighbors and cooperative partners, Xi said that in the 33 years since the establishment of diplomatic ties, the two sides have overcome differences in ideology and social systems, advanced hand in hand and achieved mutual successes, achieving stable and healthy development of bilateral relations.

    He added that this not only improved the well-being of the peoples of the two countries, but also made a positive contribution to promoting regional peace, stability, development and prosperity.

    The Chinese leader stressed that he attaches great importance to developing relations with the Republic of Korea.

    In the modern world, changes unseen in a century are occurring at an accelerated pace and destabilizing factors in the international and regional situation are increasing, he noted.

    China and the ROK are important countries in the world and the region, and Beijing is willing to work with Seoul to remain committed to the spirit that guided the establishment of their diplomatic ties, uphold good-neighborliness and friendship, and adhere to the goal of mutual benefit and win-win, so as to jointly promote the continuous development of the bilateral strategic cooperative partnership and bring more benefits to the two peoples, Xi said. -0-

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI Russia: China launches campaign to stimulate consumption of services

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: People’s Republic of China in Russian – People’s Republic of China in Russian –

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    NANJING, June 4 (Xinhua) — A nationwide service consumption campaign was launched in Nanjing, capital of east China’s Jiangsu Province, on Tuesday, the latest major initiative to boost growth in the sector.

    The event, organized by the Ministry of Commerce of the People’s Republic of China and China Media Group, with the support of the Jiangsu Provincial Bureau of Commerce and the Nanjing People’s Government, aims to cultivate new consumption points in the service sector and thereby create a new consumption architecture characterized by interaction and favorable circulation between supply and consumption.

    The campaign will involve more than 160 key events involving government agencies, national industry associations and leading enterprises to create new consumption scenarios, stimulate consumer potential and expand the supply of high-quality services to meet the diverse demands of the population.

    In 2024, Jiangsu Province’s service consumption expenditure accounted for 46.3% of the province’s total consumption expenditure, 0.2 percentage points higher than the national average. -0-

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Sultan Qaboos University and HSE Discuss Scientific and Educational Cooperation

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: State University Higher School of Economics – State University Higher School of Economics –

    © Higher School of Economics

    On May 29, 2025, a delegation from Sultan Qaboos University paid an official visit to HSE. The meeting was held on Pokrovsky Boulevard and was dedicated to the development of partnership in science and education. The delegation was led by the Rector of Sultan Qaboos University, His Highness Dr. Fahd Al Said. During the visit, an agreement on cooperation and exchange between the universities was signed.

    The parties discussed possible formats of cooperation: academic and student exchanges, joint research, teaching Arabic to HSE students, and joint publications in international scientific journals. The participants noted their interest in establishing direct contacts between the research teams of the two universities.

    HSE Rector Nikita Anisimov noted that interest in the Middle East countries, including the Sultanate of Oman, is growing, and stressed the importance of dialogue with universities in the region. According to him, Russian higher education today is focused on technological development in both engineering and humanitarian fields, and HSE is actively involved in implementing the priorities outlined by the Russian Government for the next decade. The Rector specifically emphasized that Russian society faces several key challenges, one of which is overcoming the technological gap. HSE contributes to solving these problems by creating in-demand scientific and applied developments.

    Rector of Sultan Qaboos University His Highness Fahd Al Said spoke about the history and key areas of work of the university, noting its strong positions in international rankings, high competition for admission and active research activities. He expressed hope that HSE students will also be able to study in Oman, and proposed to identify specific steps for developing the partnership within two months.

    The meeting was also attended by the Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of the Sultanate of Oman to Russia, Mr. Hamud Salim Abdullah Al Tuwaikh. On behalf of the HSE, the meeting was attended by Nadezhda Orlova, Director Institute of Agricultural Research and academic director of the educational program “Bioinformatics in agrobiotechnologies“, Anna Shestakova, director Institute of Cognitive Neurosciences, Anton Yanovsky, director Center for commercialization of developments and technology transfer, as well as Director of Internationalization Kirill Kisel.

    The parties expressed confidence that educational and scientific cooperation will strengthen ties between the states.

    Sultan Qaboos University was founded in 1986 and is one of two public universities in the Sultanate of Oman. The university is ranked 1st in the country and 362nd in the world according to QS 2025. It offers programs in arts and social sciences, economics, political science, education, law, medicine and natural sciences, and many other areas. Most of the educational programs at Sultan Qaboos University are taught in English.

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Governor Newsom warns of unnecessary danger following CMS reversal of emergency protections for pregnant women in crisis

    Source: US State of California 2

    Jun 3, 2025

    What you need to know: Today, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services rescinded previous guidance reaffirming protections for emergency abortion care when medically necessary, creating serious risk for women in states with near and total  bans on abortion care.

    Sacramento, CaliforniaGovernor Gavin Newsom today decried the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ (CMS) decision to rescind previous guidance reaffirming protections under the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) for emergency abortion care when medically necessary. Today’s rescission, effective May 29, 2025, confirms that CMS will not enforce EMTALA when hospitals do not provide emergency abortion care necessary to stabilize a patient’s health.

    “Today’s decision will endanger lives and lead to emergency room deaths – full stop. Doctors must be empowered to save the lives of their patients, not hem and haw over political red lines when the clock is ticking. In California, we will always protect the right of physicians to do what’s best for their patients and for women to make the reproductive decisions that are best for their families.”

    Governor Gavin Newsom

    What this means for patients

    While today’s ruling does not impact women in California, where doctors are always legally empowered to put the safety of their patients first, it will likely have an increasingly chilling effect on hospitals and physicians, particularly in states with total abortion bans that do not make exceptions for the health of the pregnant person (Arkansas, Idaho, Mississippi, Oklahoma, and South Dakota). Hospitals and physicians in these states are legally prohibited from providing abortion as a stabilizing treatment for women experiencing emergency medical conditions, unless that condition becomes life-threatening.

    How we got here

    Following the Supreme Court’s decision Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health, President Joe Biden’s administration issued guidance stating that: “A physician’s professional and legal duty to provide stabilizing medical treatment to a patient… preempts any directly conflicting state law or mandate that might otherwise prohibit or prevent such treatment.” The guidance clarified that hospitals and physicians have an obligation to provide stabilizing care, including abortion, if that is necessary to stabilize a patient experiencing an emergency medical condition. 

    The Biden administration sued the state of Idaho in August 2022 arguing that their near-total abortion ban was in violation of EMTALA. In June 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling meant that hospitals in Idaho could perform emergency services, including abortions, to save the life of a pregnant woman. At the time, the Court declined to make clear that federal law protects pregnant women in emergency settings. The Trump administration dismissed that lawsuit in March.

    California leadership on reproductive health care

    California has also already taken multiple actions to protect patients in states with extreme abortion bans, and in California. In the years since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, Governor Newsom, in partnership with the California Legislature, has built California into a national leader for reproductive freedom and expanded the fight nationwide through the 23-Governor Reproductive Freedom Alliance.

    People seeking abortion care or information about reproductive health care in California, should visit Abortion.CA.Gov.

    Recent news

    News SACRAMENTO – Governor Gavin Newsom today announced the following appointments:Alana Mathews, of Elk Grove, has been appointed Deputy Secretary of Enforcement and General Counsel at the California Environmental Protection Agency. Mathews has been Assistant…

    News What you need to know: The state will use specially equipped vehicles to collect block-by-block air quality data in 64 communities heavily burdened by pollution. The results will help create local solutions to improve air quality and public health.  SACRAMENTO –…

    News To the People of California,Recent years have seen a troubling spike in reported hate crimes and manifestations of bigotry. In response, California launched a robust anti-hate agenda that includes significant investments and actions to support and protect all the…

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Economics: ECB reports on Bulgaria’s progress towards euro adoption

    Source: European Central Bank

    4 June 2025

    • ECB report assesses Bulgaria’s progress towards Economic and Monetary Union
    • Positive assessment with respect to possible euro adoption on 1 January 2026

    Bulgaria has made good progress towards economic convergence with the euro area since 2024, according to the Convergence Report of the European Central Bank (ECB) published today.

    “This positive assessment of convergence paves the way for Bulgaria to introduce the euro as of 1 January 2026 and become the 21st EU Member State to join the euro area,” said Philip R. Lane, Member of the ECB Executive Board. “I wish to congratulate Bulgaria on its tremendous dedication to making the adjustments needed.”

    According to the ECB’s assessment, Bulgaria is within the reference values of the convergence criteria and complies with the legal requirements. Having participated in the exchange rate mechanism (ERM II) and the banking union since 10 July 2020, Bulgaria has made another step towards European integration under challenging economic conditions. Achieving an environment that is conducive to sustainable convergence in Bulgaria requires stability-oriented economic policies and wide-ranging structural reforms. These policies are discussed in more detail in the report.

    As regards the price stability criterion, in April 2025, the 12-month average rate of HICP inflation in Bulgaria stood at 2.7%, i.e. just below the reference value of 2.8% (Chart 1). The reference value is based on the three best performing Member States in terms of price stability, i.e. Ireland (1.2%), Finland (1.3%) and Italy (1.4%), taking their average inflation over the past 12 months and adding 1.5 percentage points.

    Chart 1

    HICP inflation and reference value

    (annual percentage changes)

    Sources: European Commission (Eurostat) and ECB calculations.
    Notes: 12-month moving average rounded to one decimal.

    Regarding the fiscal criterion, Bulgaria has not been subject to an excessive deficit procedure since 2012. The country’s general government budget deficit stood at 3.0% of GDP in 2024, i.e. at the level of the 3% reference value (Chart 2). Its general government gross debt-to-GDP ratio stood at 24.1%, i.e. well below the 60% reference value, and it has been well below 60% of GDP for the past 20 years.

    Chart 2

    General government balance and debt

    (as a percentage of GDP)

    Sources: European System of Central Banks and European Commission (Eurostat).

    As regards the exchange rate criterion, the Bulgarian lev participated in ERM II in the two-year reference period from 20 May 2023 to 19 May 2025. Over the reference period, the lev did not exhibit any deviation from the central rate of 1.95583 levs per euro. Bulgaria has completed almost all of its ERM II post-entry commitments, but further progress is needed to address the outstanding shortcomings in the area of anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism.

    Long-term interest rates in Bulgaria stood at 3.9%, on average, over the reference period from May 2024 to April 2025 and were therefore below the 5.1% reference value for the interest rate convergence criterion.

    As for the compatibility of national legislation, Bulgarian law is compatible with the Treaties and the Statute of the ESCB, as required under Article 131 of the Treaty.

    Today’s report was published following Bulgaria’s request, the next regular Convergence Report of the ECB will be published in 2026.

    For media queries, please contact Benoit Deeg, tel.: +49 172 1683704.

    Notes

    • European Commission Convergence Report 2025
    • Close cooperation established between ECB and Bulgaria
    • The Convergence Report of the ECB reviews the economic and legal convergence of non-euro area EU Member States with a derogation every second year or at the request of a specific country. It assesses the degree of sustainable economic convergence with the euro area, whether the national legislation is compatible with the EU legal framework, and whether the statutory requirements are fulfilled for the respective national central banks. Given its “opt-out” clause, Denmark is not covered by this assessment unless this is specifically requested by the country.
    • The cut-off date for the statistics included in this Convergence Report was 19 May 2025. The reference period for the price stability criterion and the long-term interest rate criterion is from May 2024 to April 2025. Forecasts are based on the European Commission’s Spring 2025 Economic Forecast and other information relevant to a forward-looking assessment of the sustainability of convergence.

    MIL OSI Economics

  • MIL-OSI Economics: China commits USD 600,000 to support WTO accession and least-developed countries

    Source: WTO

    Headline: China commits USD 600,000 to support WTO accession and least-developed countries

    The China Programme — launched in July 2011 under the WTO-led Aid for Trade initiative — aims to enable LDCs to better integrate into the global economy by strengthening their participation in WTO activities and helping those not yet members join the Organization. The signing ceremony was held on the side of a meeting of trade ministers hosted by Australia on the sidelines of the annual Ministerial Council Meeting of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 
    The China Programme finances activities to support, among others:

    An internship programme at the WTO
    China Round Tables on WTO accessions
    Increasing participation of LDCs in WTO meetings
    South-South dialogue on LDCs and development
    Follow-up workshops to LDCs’ Trade Policy Reviews
    LDCs Experience Sharing Programme

    The Programme has also contributed to financing the participation of LDC government officials in WTO ministerial conferences.
    More information can be found here.
    DG Okonjo-Iweala said: “I warmly welcome the renewal of this programme, which stands as testimony to China’s commitment to facilitating the integration of LDCs into global trade. A substantial part of this programme goes to support LDCs and other economies in the process of acceding to the WTO, an important step in using trade to meet their economic and development objectives. China’s contribution in current challenging times is mostly welcome.”
    Minister Wang said: “In the past years, by continuously funding various activities of the China Programme, China has been taking every solid step to help developing members, especially the LDCs, better integrate into the multilateral trading system. Noticing the technical assistance resource constraints WTO is currently facing, China raises its contribution to the China Programme to USD 600,000, demonstrating its firm support to WTO capacity building activities for developing members especially the LDCs. In the future, China is willing to continue making contributions, better operate the China Programme together with the Secretariat, and implement the Global Development Initiative (GDI) with practical actions.”
    Each year, the WTO Secretariat and the government of China review the contents and consider the renewal of the Memorandum of Understanding on the China Programme.
    Since 2008, China has contributed just around USD 11 million (approximately CHF 9.0 million) to assist developing economy members and observers , especially LDCs, in integrating more fully into the multilateral trade system.

    Share

    MIL OSI Economics

  • MIL-OSI Economics: WTO upgrades e-Learning platform to enhance user experience and learning outcomes

    Source: WTO

    Headline: WTO upgrades e-Learning platform to enhance user experience and learning outcomes

    This upgrade marks a major step forward in expanding access to WTO e-Learning courses. Forming part of the technical assistance programmes delivered by the WTO Secretariat to build trade capacity in developing and least-developed members and observers, these courses are also freely accessible to the wider public across all sectors.
    “We are excited to launch the upgraded platform, which reflects our continued commitment to accessible and high-quality trade-related learning,” said Roberto Fiorentino, Head of the WTO e-Learning Unit. “The improvements will enable users to navigate more easily the e-Learning platform, manage their learning more effectively, and engage more deeply with the WTO’s online training.”
    Key upgrades to the platform include:

    A redesigned user interface featuring intuitive navigation, improved accessibility features and simplified access to the course catalogue, certificates and support resources.
    A refined course catalogue with advanced search and filtering options, making it easier to find courses by language, level, topic, training path and duration.
    Greater flexibility in assessments, including extended time limits, retake opportunities for final exams, and enhanced dashboard tools for tracking progress.
    Strengthened community engagement through updated discussion forums and mobile app notifications to foster collaboration among participants.
    Simplified access to learning reports, empowering learners to easily monitor their progress.
    A newly developed Help Centre offering comprehensive guidance on technical requirements, registration, eligibility, certification criteria and more.
    Enhanced data protection through advanced security measures to safeguard user information and ensure a safe digital learning environment.

    The WTO e-Learning platform currently offers 176 free courses covering various WTO agreements and trade-related issues, with additional courses under development. With over 13,000 government officials from developing and least-developed WTO members and observers enrolled in these courses, along with more than 9,000 e-learners from academia, the private sector and other professional communities, the upgraded e-Learning platform is designed to be more user-centric and responsive, ensuring that it meets the evolving needs of its diverse user base.

    Share

    MIL OSI Economics

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: African values under threat: African Commission must defend them

    Source: Amnesty International –

    By Khanyo Farise

    A poster featuring an all-white male panel of speakers from Europe, the US and other regions circulated online, promoting a pan-African conference on African Family Values. 

    The line-up was a tell-tale sign of yet another event underwritten by Global North actors with a clear anti-rights agenda. The organisers were forced to add African panellists after a backlash but, despite outrage from women’s groups and human rights organisations about its harmful content, the conference went ahead.   

    The main speakers were from organisations such as CitizenGo, Family Watch International, Family Policy Institute and Christian Council International, as well as churches and parliamentarians. These were also among the supporters and sponsors for the event. These organisations are known for conservative family and societal values advocating for what they call “traditional family values”. 

    The event organisers, African Christian Professionals Forum, has deep ties with these organisations including some of its board members associated with various US-based anti-rights groups

    At its core the conference promoted opposition to abortion, LGBTI rights, reproductive healthcare and comprehensive sexuality education. Among the organisers’ key issues of concern is that “African nations face pressure to enact policies, sign agreements and treaties that contradict their cultural and religious beliefs”.  The conference was aimed to “promote and protect sanctity of life, family values, religious freedoms and values-based education and good governance”. These aims are similar to US-based anti-rights groups

    Event participants not only advocate in their countries on these topics but also at regional forums, including the African Union, and at the international level. Civil society has warned of the potential for increasingly coordinated attacks against the AU by these groups. 

    This conference comes at a time of increasing authoritarianism where opportunistic populists, seeking to score cheap political points, often tout the idea that LGBTI identities are “un-African” and against “African values”. 

    Khanyo Farise

    The 2025 Convention on Eliminating Violence against Women and Girls is thought to be their next advocacy target. They will probably argue that this treaty promotes gender ideology, a similar strategy adopted by anti-rights groups in Europe against the Istanbul Convention, which is also aimed at preventing and combatting violence against women.  

    This conference comes at a time of increasing authoritarianism where opportunistic populists, seeking to score cheap political points, often tout the idea that LGBTI identities are “un-African” and against “African values”. 

    The conference was attended by MPs from Uganda and Malawi and Kenyan lawyers. This is unsurprising since there have long been reports that US groups have financed propaganda about sexual and gender diversity, and have helped shape some of the harshest anti-LGBTI laws in Africa.  

    The language of ‘African values’ emerged at the regional level in 2018 when the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights (ACHPR), the continent’s highest human rights body, at the instruction of the African Union, stripped the Coalition of African Lesbians’ observer status.

    In 2022 the ACHPR, this time on its own accord, then denied observer status to three human rights groups, claiming that LGBTI identities are “contrary to the virtues of African values”. These decisions ran counter to the historic Resolution passed by the ACHPR in 2014 which was clear that LGBTI identities enjoy full protection under the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights.  

    But what does it mean to be African? What are African values? 

    The African Charter empowers the ACHPR to undertake studies and research to address such questions. The ACHPR then uses these studies as a basis for principles and rules to guide African governments. In this vein, in 2023 the African Commission considered and adopted “a paper on African Values”. This paper is not public, so its contents are unknown, but it is probably aimed at explaining what the ACHPR means by “African values”,  to guide African governments in their human rights legislation. 

    In answering this question, there are three key areas the ACHPR should consider. 

    First is a recognition that African families are incredibly diverse. The drafters of the African Charter acknowledged that African society is far too complex to be neatly compartmentalised. It was for this reason that the charter deliberately fails to define the notion of “peoples”, in clear recognition of the diversity of African families, societies and communities. The ACHPR must likewise not confine African identities to cis-gender and heterosexual, nor restrict the concept of the African family to a nuclear model.

    Second is that the principle of non-discrimination permeates the charter and provides the touchstone of the African concept of human rights. The charter affirms that “every individual shall respect and consider his fellow beings without discrimination and to maintain relations aimed at promoting, safeguarding and reinforcing mutual respect and tolerance”. 

    The charter’s drafters entrenched the idea of non-discrimination because, at the time, African leaders were focused on liberation from colonialism and racism. Indeed, the document broke new ground by prohibiting ethnic discrimination, a prohibition not found in other international agreements at the time. Non-discrimination against LGBTI people is firmly within both the letter and spirit of the African Charter’s values. 

    And finally that LGBTI identities are firmly ensconced in African values historically. Same-sex sexualities and gender diversity were present in pre-colonial Africa. It was not until colonisation that Africa’s European subjugators imposed anti-LGBTI laws as part of their “civilising mission”. After independence, many African countries — Angola, Botswana, Mauritius, Namibia, South Africa, to name a few — dismissed those colonial-era laws and now recognise LGBTI people’s rights. Simply put, LGBTI people are as African as anyone else, and deserve the same protection by the African Charter.

    With anti-rights actors co-opting African values using neo-colonial tactics, there is greater urgency for the ACHPR to reclaim African values and redefine them in accordance with the African Charter. Drawing on the wisdom of our forebears, the ACHPR must affirm that discrimination has no place in African societies. It should root its approach in both our pre-colonial histories and the present reality of millions of LGBTI Africans who are entitled to the same human rights as anyone else, no matter what opportunistic western anti-rights actors might say. African values must be used to advance inclusion, non-discrimination and equality, not exclusion and discrimination.  

    Khanyo Farise is a senior researcher on civic space at Amnesty International, East and Southern Africa.

    This oped first ran in South Africa’s Mail and Guardian

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI Video: India/Pakistan conflict – Press Conference | United Nations

    Source: United Nations (Video News)

    Press Conference by Bilawal Bhutto Zardari, former Foreign Minister of Pakistan, accompanied by a high-level parliamentary delegation, on recent developments in South Asia.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uO87TY8kiq4

    MIL OSI Video

  • PM Modi to lead tree plantation drive, flag off 200 electric buses in Delhi on World Environment Day

    Source: Government of India

    Source: Government of India (4)

    Prime Minister Narendra Modi will mark World Environment Day on June 5 by leading a special tree plantation drive at Bhagwan Mahavir Vanasthali Park, New Delhi, as part of the ‘Ek Ped Maa Ke Naam’ initiative. The drive forms a crucial component of the ambitious ‘Aravalli Green Wall Project’ aimed at reforesting the 700-km-long Aravalli range.

    The Prime Minister will plant a Banyan sapling to symbolise India’s commitment to environmental conservation and afforestation efforts. The Aravalli Green Wall Project targets a 5-km buffer zone around the Aravalli Hills across 29 districts in Delhi, Rajasthan, Haryana, and Gujarat. It focuses on increasing green cover, restoring biodiversity, improving soil fertility, conserving water bodies, and enhancing climate resilience in the region.

    Besides ecological benefits, the project is expected to generate employment and provide livelihood opportunities for local communities through afforestation and restoration activities.

    In a parallel move to promote sustainable urban mobility, PM Modi will also flag off 200 electric buses under the Delhi government’s clean transport initiative. The introduction of these electric buses aims to reduce air pollution and boost the adoption of green transportation in the national capital.

  • MIL-OSI United Nations: From heatwaves to cyber threats: a comprehensive new guide to today’s hazards

    Source: UNISDR Disaster Risk Reduction

    UNDRR and ISC release an updated overview of hazards to help governments, researchers, and responders to better understand and act on interconnected risks.

    Geneva / Paris – 4 June 2025 – The United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR) and the International Science Council (ISC) have released an updated edition of their comprehensive hazard guide, offering clear, standardized information on 282 hazards – from wildfires and earthquakes to cyberattacks and pandemics.

    The new edition reflects the complex and interconnected nature of today’s global risk landscape. Hazards increasingly occur together, cascade across systems, and amplify one another. In response, the updated profiles emphasize a multi-hazard approach-critical for effective early warning systems, emergency planning, and disaster resilience. Originally launched in 2021 as the first resource of its kind, the hazard definitions and classification provide an authoritative technical foundation for disaster risk reduction efforts worldwide. This updated edition builds on that foundation with:

    • 282 reviewed hazards across 8 types and 39 clusters
    • Improved, machine-readable format to support their use across digital tools and systems. E.g. the updated hazard taxonomy with standard definitions enables the new generation UNDRR-UNDP-WMO disaster tracking system.
    • Clearer articulation of hazard interactions and multi-hazard scenarios
    • User-informed revisions and new content to support real-world planning and response

    “From local governments to humanitarian agencies, the need for consistent, science-based hazard information is universal. These profiles reflect the best available scientific understanding of hazards and offer a foundation for evidence-based policies that reduce risk and build resilience,” said Salvatore Aricò, CEO, International Science Council.

    “Reliable and standardized hazard data are essential for informing disaster risk reduction strategies. This update helps countries implement the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction to reduce losses by 2030,” said Kamal Kishore, the Special Representative of the United Nations Secretary-General for Disaster Risk Reduction.

    “This updated edition reflects what we’ve learned: hazards are not standalone events. They are part of a complex web of risk. By bringing together diverse expert and user input, we’ve made these profiles more actionable, more interconnected, and more immediately useful,” said Professor Virginia Murray, Chair of the Hazard Information Profiles Steering Group.

    The revision process engaged over 270 experts, reviewers, and users from across sectors and regions. A dedicated User Group, Multi-Hazard Group, and Machine Actionability Group ensured the profiles remain practical, future-ready, and inclusive of diverse perspectives and needs.

    Since the initial release, the hazard profiles have been widely used by national disaster management agencies, UN bodies, researchers, and humanitarian organizations for planning, monitoring, risk assessments, and training. This success has prompted the current update to ensure that they remain relevant and up to date.

    Explore the updated hazard profile


    Contacts

    Zhenya Tsoy, Head of Communications, International Science Council 

    MIL OSI United Nations News

  • MIL-OSI United Nations: The 2025 update of the UNDRR-ISC Hazard Information Profiles (HIPs)

    Source: UNISDR Disaster Risk Reduction

    The HIPs serve as a trusted source of scientifically grounded, standardized hazard information used by governments, agencies, researchers and educators worldwide. They support risk assessment, disaster preparedness, loss tracking and multi-sectoral planning. Above all, they are a practical resource – valued because they are usable, useful and used.

    In 2023, UNDRR and the ISC launched a revision of the HIPs, involving experts from organizations including United Nations agencies, scientific disciplinary unions, academia, the private sector and the humanitarian sector. In the end, 330 authors and reviewers from across more than 150 organizations participated. The result is a revised list of 282 hazards grouped into eight hazard types: 

    1. Hydrological and Meteorological
    2. Extraterrestrial
    3. Geological
    4. Environmental
    5. Chemical
    6. Biological
    7. Technological
    8. Societal

    MIL OSI United Nations News

  • MIL-OSI United Nations: United to enhance disaster preparedness: Announcing the launch of the Priority Actions to Enhance Readiness for Resilient Recovery

    Source: UNISDR Disaster Risk Reduction

    On 3 June 2025, global leaders gathered at the World Resilient Recovery Conference (WRRC) to launch the Priority Actions to Enhance Readiness for Resilient Recovery – an initiative aimed at accelerating the implementation of Priority Action 4 of the Sendai Framework: Enhancing disaster preparedness for effective response and to “Build Back Better” in recovery, rehabilitation and reconstruction. 

    The ten actions, pictured and described in further detail below, are important for several reasons. 

    First, the consultative process to get there was comprehensive and all-inclusive. A total of 130 countries participated across four distinct regions (Africa, Europe and Central Asia, Americas and the Caribbean and Arab States), bringing a diverse set of opinions, needs and expectations. In the end, more than 4,000 individual participants shared their knowledge and expertise. 

    The agreed-upon actions are representative of this crucial and comprehensive consultation process, with a particular focus on people. For example, Priority Action 9 aims to “Localize recovery through community leadership and empowerment.” Key methods to achieve this goal include strengthening the role of local governments and rural and urban governance in recovery readiness, ensuring they have the authority, resources, and capacity to act effectively as they are in the first line of response.

    In addition, creating flexible financing mechanisms that channel funds directly to local actors and frontline responders is also crucial. These tenets of governance and financing were previously discussed in two key webinars in the build-up to WRRC. Finally, the global DRR community must also institutionalize inclusive consultation processes with native and indigenous communities, marginalized and high-risk populations in recovery planning.

    A renewed focus on people and human recovery 

    Similarly, Priority Action 2 emphasizes strengthening the international community’s capacity to “Build and sustain institutional and human capacity for recovery.” In his remarks at the Opening Ceremony for this year’s WRRC, Special Representative of the Secretary-General (SRSG) for Disaster Risk Reduction and Head of UNDRR Kamal Kishore highlighted that the change in name from World Reconstruction Conference (WRC) to World Resilient Recovery Conference (WRRC) is a part of an intentional “shift in focus from reconstructing physical assets to ensuring human recovery.” He further added that, “It is not just important to reconstruct schools and houses and hospitals that have been damaged in an earthquake or a cyclone, but it is even more important that children have access to safe learning spaces, hospitals provide services [and] infrastructure is built to better standards so that it continues to facilitate livelihoods of communities that it seeks to serve.” 

    SRSG Kishore also emphasized the importance of Priority 4 of the Sendai Framework and its emphasis on “Build Back Better”, which was echoed by Mr. Hiroaki Hara, Vice Minister for Policy Coordination of the Cabinet Office in Japan, and co-chair of the International Recovery Platform (IRP). In his remarks, Vice Minister Hara noted that this year marks the 30th anniversary of the Great Hanshin Earthquake in Japan, and that “the recovery from this earthquake generated the initial concept of ‘Build Back Better’ for a disaster-resilient society.” He went on to say that “Today’s conference will set an important milestone by focusing particularly on strengthening recovery readiness at national and local levels.

    Emphasizing implementation and the way forward 

    Beyond the launch itself, the emphasis now shifts to implementation of the Priority Actions. Several key events in the coming months will offer the DRR community opportunities to track progress. These include the High-level Policy Forum on Recovery in September 2025, Regional Dialogues on Resilient Recovery, and the roll-out of the IRP Recovery Readiness Assessment Framework. 

    During the closing ceremony of the WRRC, Ms. Paola Albrito, Director of UNDRR, emphasized this way forward when she said that, “The International Recovery Platform will move ahead with implementation in close coordination with member states and other relevant partners. This includes convening a high-level political forum on recovery in September of this year to scale our commitment. At the regional level, we will use the regional dialogues on resilient recovery to ensure the regional perspectives and needs are fully integrated. And at the national level…a top priority will be the roll-out of the recovery readiness assessment to support countries in evaluating and strengthening their preparedness for resilient recovery. Let’s move forward, united in purpose and bold in action.”

    UNDRR Director Paola Albrito presents the first five Priority Actions 

    Ambassador Christian Frutiger, Assistant Director General and Head of the Global Cooperation Domain said, “[I am] very proud to launch the Priority Actions to Enhance Readiness for Resilient Recovery. These are not just technical recommendations. They are a call to action for national and local governments and partners to join hands in enhancing readiness for resilient recovery. It is important to emphasize that the 10 priority actions are not stand-alone measures. They are interconnected pieces of a larger puzzle.” A short intermission between the presentation of the first five and second five priorities featured a performance by the percussion band KomandoBidon, to spur attendees onwards. “Let’s follow the drumbeat to action”, Ambassador Fruitger said. “We leave here with a clear set of priority actions; concrete steps we can put into practice. Now is the moment to invest, in readiness, in partnerships and in people. Let us carry this momentum into the 8th session of the Global Platform for Disaster Risk Reduction. Let us stay connected…and commit to turn our priorities into lasting impact.

    As part of the Global Platform for Disaster Risk Reduction (GP2025), WRRC plays a key role in shaping global recovery dialogue. Organized under the umbrella of the International Recovery Platform (IRP), with support from key stakeholders, the conference featured technical sessions, masterclasses and regional consultations – all focused on strengthening readiness for resilient recovery. We invite you to explore the session recordings here.

    MIL OSI United Nations News

  • MIL-OSI United Nations: GPDRR 2025 highlights: Tuesday 3 June 2025

    Source: UNISDR Disaster Risk Reduction

    The human cost of disasters includes lost livelihoods, homes, and cultural ties to landscapes. Where livelihoods are already fragile and being eroded, a disaster-induced displacement of even a few days can damage economic opportunities for years to come. So, the human dimension of recovery remains central to discussions as delegates convened for a second day in several preparatory events for the 8th Global Platform for Disaster Risk Reduction (GPDRR), namely: the World Resilient Recovery Conference, the Third Stakeholder Forum on DRR, and the Global Early Warning for All Multistakeholder Forum (EW4All).

    The GPDRR official programme was launched with a high-level roundtable event at lunchtime and a formal opening ceremony in the afternoon, followed by an official reception.

    Official programme

    Opening

    Kamal Kishore, Special Representative of the UN Secretary-General for Disaster Risk Reduction, and head of UNDRR, opened the event highlighting the exceptional urgency and importance of delivering on the Sendai Framework. He underscored how communities were coming together and the need to learn from their initiatives, imagination, and resourcefulness, and called for commitment from all actors.

    Recalling the recent loss of a Swiss village to a glacier landslide, Amina J. Mohammed, United Nations Deputy Secretary-General, commented that “early warning saves lives but cannot save glaciers from disappearing.” She stressed that disasters and their cascading effects annually cost up to USD 3.2 trillion and noted that record-breaking disasters make entire regions uninsurable. She called for risk-informed development across all sectors; scaled-up public and private investments in resilience; and national financial frameworks that align with adaptation needs.

    Ignazio Cassis, Minister, Federal Department of Foreign Affairs, Switzerland, observed that, “Risk today is everywhere. Fires are where wetlands were centuries ago.” Noting that the GPDRR2025 is the last Global Platform before the 2030 deadline, he urged that countries deliver on the Sendai Framework, apply science and artificial intelligence, and adopt risk mitigation metrics to mobilize and foster resources.

    Amina J. Mohammed, UN Deputy Secretary-General.

    After a musical performance on the Hang Drum and a choreographed presentation by Sendai4Youth, Patricia Danzi, Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation, opened the Eighth Session of the GPDRR.

    Enhancing national DRR governance by 2030—A dialogue among national platforms for DRR

    In opening remarks to this high-level event, Kishore observed that the risk landscape platform is becoming increasingly complex. He recommended strengthening national DRR platforms and embedding risk reduction into national policies and frameworks; ensuring sustainable and predictable finance with policies matching sustainable long-term plans; and having a common risk assessment framework to support national entities with proper data and analytics.

    Speaking on behalf of the host country, Franziska Schmid, Swiss National Platform for Natural Hazards (PLANAT), described the work of PLANAT and highlighted challenges, including overlapping reporting mechanisms and strategies among national government entities focused on resilience. She stressed the importance of addressing duplication, developing appropriate tools, such as hazard maps and building permits, and ensuring crisis management provisions are actually functional.

    Discussions then followed in a roundtable format, moderated by Paola Albrito, UNDRR. Albrito invited delegates to: describe the demonstrated impact of their National Platforms for DRR, share lessons learned, identify remaining gaps in DRR governance, and highlight ways and opportunities to boost Sendai Framework implementation by 2030.

    View of the room during the Dialogue Among National Platforms for DRR.

    In their interventions, many called for collaboration among regional and country partners. Speakers included the Deputy Prime Minister of the Democratic Republic of Congo and Tajikistan, as well as many ministers and high-level government representatives. They highlighted lessons and challenges, including: enhancing preparedness through strengthening and modernizing approaches; improving planning and promoting concrete analyses from real-life situations at the grassroots; and mobilizing adequate financing and developing technical expertise to adequately prepare communities.

    All interventions are recorded here.

    Third Stakeholder Forum on DRR

    The Stakeholder Forum continued its deliberations throughout the day, concluding in the afternoon with reflections by supporters and participants of the Stakeholder Engagement Mechanism.

    Spotlight session—Early warning for all

    Moderator Rebecca Murphy, Global Network of Civil Society Organisations for Disaster Reduction (GNDR), invited the UNDRR Stakeholder Forum and the Multi-Stakeholder EW4All communities to combine efforts in crafting action points for the 2025 Global Platform on DRR.

    In the keynote, Gavin White, Risk-informed Early Action Partnership (REAP), summarized common themes in Early Warning, noting that: preparing for disasters is about inclusiveness, honest communication and trusting the person who is providing the guidance; and early warning systems (EWS) can act as a bridge overcoming the silo approaches among different DRR stakeholders. Panelists suggested that: while no system can predict with 100% certainty what shape hazards will take, it is crucial to build trust and understand local contexts; response planners should establish appropriate actions to follow early warnings; emergency systems must be tailored to communities’ experiences so that people can distinguish between different disasters and respond uniquely to each threat; both elderly and youth can inform EWS and response planning; and conflict zones require unique solutions that consider the fragility and power dynamics within communities.

    Bridging the gap: Critical media’s role in strengthening alerts and enhancing disaster preparedness

    Giacomo Mazzone, Media Saving Lives, moderated the session. Matthieu Rawolle, EBU Media Intelligence Service, shared examples of how terrestrial radio networks remained uninterrupted and accessible during disasters, and are used to inform the public and facilitate emergency response, especially when mobile phone and internet services are interrupted. He concluded that radio is an essential communication medium in times of crisis and requires investment.

    Raditya Jati, Deputy Minister of System and Strategy, National Disaster Management Authority, Indonesia, emphasized the need for media to go beyond reporting on casualties and housing collapse, and to incorporate education for people to prepare for disasters.

    Event rooms remained full throughout the day.

    Noting that UNDRR is the first UN agency that recognized media’s role in crises, Natalia Ilieva, Asia-Pacific Broadcasting Union, described the Media Saving Lives collaboration between the World Broadcasting Unions and UNDRR that focuses on shifting media perspectives from reactive to proactive reporting, showing the real causes for disasters and instructing people on how to avoid harm. Grégoire Ndjaka, African Broadcasting Union, highlighted the reach of radio in Africa extending to places without electricity supply. Orengiye Fyneface, African Broadcasting Union, discussed trust challenges with journalism as a disaster information source in Africa, pointing to bureaucratic hurdles that prevent journalists from reaching scientists.

    Shaping a sustainable tomorrow: Aligning the Sendai Midterm Review with the Pact for the Future

    Abraham Bugre, University of Regina, moderated this session. In her opening remarks, Toni-Shae Freckleton, UNDRR, called for transitioning from short-term responses to long-term prevention. She stated that the Pact for the Future embeds DRR and resilience building.

    Juan Carlos Uribe Vega, United Cities and Local Governments (UCLG) highlighted gaps in understanding localization and the importance of local-level governance. Jekulin Lipi Saikia, GNDR, called for a focus on listening to and working with communities, improving financial access, and increasing citizen science. Amber Fletcher, University of Regina, emphasized the role of community-driven actions, citizen science, and community engagement in reaching the diverse range of local voices. In the ensuing discussion, attendees identified communication disconnection, lack of funding, and localization among the persistent gaps between global networks and local realities.

    Closing session

    Tanjir Hossain, UNDRR Stakeholder Engagement Mechanism (SEM), moderated the closing session. Jamie Cummings, SEM, recalled her own experience of disaster when Hurricane Helene struck her hometown of Asheville, North Carolina. Describing how volunteers had operated a traditional Appalachian mule brigade to transport life-saving medications to mountain communities after roads were destroyed, she reflected that, “communities who know the land most, hold the solutions.” Martin Schuldes, German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ), stressed that “the substance and spirit” of the conference must translate into concrete action.

    Jilhane El Gaouzi, African Union Commission, urged all concerned to “be realistic and speed up implementation,” given that only five years remain until the Sendai Framework deadline.

    View of the panel during the Closing Session of the Stakeholder Forum.

    World Resilient Recovery Conference

    At the opening of this one-day event, Mutale Nalumongo, Vice-President, Zambia, highlighted Zambia’s promotion of climate-resilient agriculture through promotion of drought-tolerant crop varieties, access to weather-based insurance and investment in EWS, including advisories to farmers. Following further opening remarks by speakers, two plenaries and several thematic sessions took place during the day.

    Plenary 1—Taking stock of current recovery practices

    Carolina Fuentes Castellanos, Director, Santiago Network Secretariat, moderated the session.

    Sujit Mohanty, UNDRR, noted the high costs of reconstruction and the difficulties of countries that are perpetually in a state of recovery from one disaster after another, pointing to the need to address institutional fragmentation.

    Renato Umali Solidum, Jr., Department of Science and Technology, Philippines, advocated for greater cohesion between DRR and climate action as being “two sides of the same coin.” He called for transparent grant-based governance to reach at-risk commuities and address both slow-onset and sudden disasters.

    Leon Lundy, Minister of State Office, The Bahamas, highlighted the launch of The Bahamas’ National Disaster Risk Management Authority. He drew attention to the 2022 Act mandating public body disaster plans, including continuity plans, restoration timelines, and staff redeployment protocols to ensure essential services can be maintained or rapidly restored after a disaster.

    Krishna Swaroop Vatsa, National Disaster Management Authority, India, highlighted allocation of 30% of the Authority’s funds for recovery and reconstruction, which are released through an assessment-based process.

    Fuentes Castellanos offered countries the Secretariat’s support for structuring technical assistance requests.

    Plenary 2—From commitment to action: Leadership for resilient recovery

    Shivangi Chavda, GNDR, moderated the session.

    Guangzhe Chen, World Bank, described the World Bank’s recent transition to supporting infrastructure resilience efforts. He invited countries to access the Bank’s preparedness and response toolkit to strengthen their disaster reduction policies, citing recent examples from Malawi, Albania, and Madagascar.

    On financial instruments, panelists explored ways to distribute more rapid financial support, including through multi-dimensional approaches.

    On displacement following disasters, Rania Sharshr, International Organization for Migration (IOM), emphasized that one of the greatest needs of governments is access to reliable and accurate data on how displaced people have been impacted, and guidance on how to integrate these people into existing communities.

    The session concluded with the presentation of the Resilient Recovery Framework by Abhilash Panda, UNDRR.

    Thematic sessions

    Further sessions took place through the day. Besides the three sessions reported here, delegates took part in other Stakeholder Forum sessions on governance mechanisms, unlocking financial potential, housing reconstruction, and multi-hazard EWS.

    Restoring livelihood: Solutions for disaster-induced displacement and resilient recovery

    Mona Folkesson, UN Development Coordination Office (DCO), moderated the session.

    Emad Adly, Arab Network for Environment and Development, highlighted water scarcity as a key issue for the region and local-level coordination as a key challenge. Alexandra Bilak, Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre (IDMC), cited experience from the 2015 Gorkha Earthquake in Nepal to show how livelihood erosion influences the severity of displacement.

    Ibrahim Osman Farah, Vice President, Somali Regional State, Ethiopia, described livelihood restoration during return and resettlement of internally displaced persons, through ensuring cultural access to land, water, schools, and income-generating opportunities as long-term resilience-based approaches.

    Tasneem Siddiqui, University of Dhaka, recounted how students were a driving force for the university’s Refugee and Migration Research Unit, which now has formed Adaptation Committees in many local areas and supports implementation of national policies on livelihood diversification and skills training. She urged treating displacement not as a humanitarian issue, but as a human rights one.

    Aslam Perwaiz, Executive Director, Asian Disaster Preparedness Center, emphasized skill development with local communities and SMEs to create livelihood options for displaced communities.

    Driving resilience: The critical role of private sector’s operational readiness for resilient recovery

    Moderator, Cedrick Moriggi, Corporate Chief Resilience Officer Network, emphasized connecting the corporate world with the UNDRR world. Ommid Saberi, International Finance Corporation, recommended investing in the “economics of families,” or small businesses, saying even small government incentives can mobilize large funds from the private sector. Dorothee Baumann-Pauly, University of Geneva, said human rights are the enablers for resilience. Jonathan Rake, Swiss Re Solutions, highlighted the need for the private sector to engage locally and to develop and combine social programmes with parametric solutions. Chris Ulatt, Octopus, said upfront investment to boost resilience is the right move, but observed that few investors will remain for the duration of an investment. Kerry Hinds, Department of Emergency Management, Barbados, described an audit tool to ascertain risks and priorities for public-private partnerships, noting the tool helps standardize and trigger business continuity protocols for disaster risk management.

    Turning experience into action: learning from large-scale disasters

    Dilanthi Amaratunga, Intergovernmental Coordination Group for the Indian Ocean Tsunami Warning and Mitigation System, moderated the session.

    Banak Joshua Dei Wal, South Sudan’s DRR Focal Point, highlighted the need to work together and identify risks for Sendai Framework implementation to be effective.

    Saini Yang, Integrated Research on Disaster Risk (IRDR), emphasized that China’s National Flood Prevention System has proven effective, with more than an 80% decrease in flood mortality rates over the last 20 years.

    Trevor Bhupsingh, Public Safety Canada, highlighted Canada’s Disaster Financial Assistance Arrangements.

    Guy Gryspeert, Honeywell, defined resilience as the capability of preventing a crisis by having awareness and planning in place.

    Ali Hamza Pehlivan, Disaster and Emergency Management Authority (AFAD), Türkiye, highlighted the usefulness of their National Disaster Response Plan during the 2023 earthquake. Makiko Ohashi, Cabinet Office of Japan, noted the utility of planning on the assumption that a mega-disaster may occur at any time and of reviewing DDR plans in the aftermath of disasters.

    Participants engage in discussions between sessions throughout the day.

    Global Early Warning for All (EW4All) Multistakeholder Forum

    After thematic sessions during the day, EW4All concluded its discussions. Gavin White, Risk-Informed Early Action Partnership, moderated the closing session. Panelists highlighted the importance of focusing on preparedness and developing trust, the need to shift perspectives toward a systemic approach to EWS, and the need to increase private funding.

    In closing remarks, Andrea Hermenejildo, Deputy Secretary General for Risk Management, Ecuador, stressed EWS is not only a technical issue, but also involves social justice. Paola Albrito, Director, UNDRR, emphasized that EW4All is both needed and achievable. Noting the central role of local communities, she underlined that resilience is built with communities.

    Doreen Bogdan-Martin, Secretary-General, International Telecommunication Union, underlined that scaling-up EWS requires partnerships and breaking silos across economic sectors, UN agencies and industries.

    Jagan Chapagain, Secretary-General, International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC), stressed that inclusive action and investment in EW4All is essential.

    Celeste Saulo, Secretary-General, World Meteorological Organization (WMO), stated that having EWS in just 108 countries is neither sufficient nor acceptable, and called for closing this “justice gap” by providing EWS worldwide and accelerating the transformation needed to protect every person on Earth.

    MIL OSI United Nations News

  • MIL-OSI: YieldMax® ETFs Announces Distributions on XYZY, WNTR, SMCY, AIYY, MSTY, and Others

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    CHICAGO and MILWAUKEE and NEW YORK, June 04, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — YieldMax® today announced distributions for the YieldMax® Weekly Payers and Group D ETFs listed in the table below.

    ETF Ticker1 ETF Name Distribution
    Frequency
    Distribution
    per Share
    Distribution
    Rate
    2,4
    30-Day
    SEC Yield3
    ROC5 Ex-Date &
    Record Date
    Payment
    Date
    CHPY YieldMax® Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF Weekly $0.3455 34.50% 0.38% 100.00% 6/5/25 6/6/25
    GPTY YieldMax® AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF Weekly $0.2977 33.62% 0.00% 100.00% 6/5/25 6/6/25
    LFGY YieldMax® Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF Weekly $0.4664 61.02% 0.00% 100.00% 6/5/25 6/6/25
    QDTY YieldMax® Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call ETF Weekly $0.2307 28.16% 0.00% 100.00% 6/5/25 6/6/25
    RDTY YieldMax® R2000 0DTE Covered Call ETF Weekly $0.2108 24.27% 0.89% 95.29% 6/5/25 6/6/25
    SDTY YieldMax® S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call ETF Weekly $0.2175 25.86% 0.00% 100.00% 6/5/25 6/6/25
    ULTY YieldMax® Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF Weekly $0.0945 78.74% 0.00% 100.00% 6/5/25 6/6/25
    YMAG YieldMax® Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs Weekly $0.2089 70.40% 66.50% 97.56% 6/5/25 6/6/25
    YMAX YieldMax® Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs Weekly $0.1721 65.23% 88.53% 92.64% 6/5/25 6/6/25
    AIYY YieldMax® AI Option Income Strategy ETF Every 4 weeks $0.3209 88.81% 2.97% 96.86% 6/5/25 6/6/25
    AMZY YieldMax® AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF Every 4 weeks $0.5955 48.28% 3.09% 94.01% 6/5/25 6/6/25
    APLY YieldMax® AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF Every 4 weeks $0.3119 30.96% 3.42% 89.96% 6/5/25 6/6/25
    DISO YieldMax® DIS Option Income Strategy ETF Every 4 weeks $0.5588 50.22% 3.16% 94.89% 6/5/25 6/6/25
    MSTY YieldMax® MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF Every 4 weeks $1.4707 85.27% 1.76% 97.45% 6/5/25 6/6/25
    SMCY YieldMax® SMCI Option Income Strategy ETF Every 4 weeks $1.5795 99.93% 3.05% 97.21% 6/5/25 6/6/25
    WNTR YieldMax® Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF Every 4 weeks $3.0725 104.26% 2.89% 97.57% 6/5/25 6/6/25
    XYZY YieldMax® XYZ Option Income Strategy ETF Every 4 weeks $0.8732 109.59% 2.93% 98.01% 6/5/25 6/6/25
    YQQQ YieldMax® Short N100 Option Income Strategy ETF Every 4 weeks $0.2650 23.18% 3.35% 86.54% 6/5/25 6/6/25
    Weekly Payers & Group A ETFs scheduled for next week: CHPY GPTY LFGY QDTY RDTY SDTY UTLY YMAG YMAX CRSH FEAT FIVY GOOY OARK SNOY TSLY TSMY XOMO YBIT

    Standardized Performance and Fund details can be obtained by clicking the ETF Ticker in the table above or by visiting us at www.yieldmaxetfs.com

    Performance data quoted represents past performance and is no guarantee of future results. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when sold or redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost and current performance may be lower or higher than the performance quoted above. Performance current to the most recent month-end can be obtained by calling (833) 378-0717.

    Note: DIPS, FIAT, CRSH, YQQQ and WNTR are hereinafter referred to as the “Short ETFs.”

    Distributions are not guaranteed. The Distribution Rate and 30-Day SEC Yield are not indicative of future distributions, if any, on the ETFs. In particular, future distributions on any ETF may differ significantly from its Distribution Rate or 30-Day SEC Yield. You are not guaranteed a distribution under the ETFs. Distributions for the ETFs (if any) are variable and may vary significantly from period to period and may be zero. Accordingly, the Distribution Rate and 30-Day SEC Yield will change over time, and such change may be significant.

    Investors in the Funds will not have rights to receive dividends or other distributions with respect to the underlying reference asset(s).

    1All YieldMax® ETFs shown in the table above (except YMAX, YMAG, FEAT, FIVY and ULTY) have a gross expense ratio of 0.99%. YMAX, FEAT have a Management Fee of 0.29% and Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses of 0.99% for a gross expense ratio of 1.28%. YMAG has a management fee of 0.29% and Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses of 0.83% for a gross expense ratio of 1.12%. FIVY has a Management Fee of 0.29% and Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses of 0.59% for a gross expense ratio of 0.88%. “Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses” are indirect fees and expenses that the Fund incurs from investing in the shares of other investment companies, namely other YieldMax® ETFs. ULTY has a gross expense ratio of 1.40%, and a net expense ratio after the fee waiver of 1.30%. The Advisor has agreed to a fee waiver of 0.10% through at least February 28, 2026.

    2The Distribution Rate shown is as of close on June 3, 2025. The Distribution Rate is the annual distribution rate an investor would receive if the most recent distribution, which includes option income, remained the same going forward. The Distribution Rate is calculated by annualizing an ETF’s Distribution per Share and dividing such annualized amount by the ETF’s most recent NAV. The Distribution Rate represents a single distribution from the ETF and does not represent its total return. Distributions may also include a combination of ordinary dividends, capital gain, and return of investor capital, which may decrease an ETF’s NAV and trading price over time. As a result, an investor may suffer significant losses to their investment. These Distribution Rates may be caused by unusually favorable market conditions and may not be sustainable. Such conditions may not continue to exist and there should be no expectation that this performance may be repeated in the future.

    3The 30-Day SEC Yield represents net investment income, which excludes option income, earned by such ETF over the 30-Day period ended May 31, 2025, expressed as an annual percentage rate based on such ETF’s share price at the end of the 30-Day period.

    4Each ETF’s strategy (except those of the Short ETFs) will cap potential gains if its reference asset’s shares increase in value, yet subjects an investor to all potential losses if the reference asset’s shares decrease in value. Such potential losses may not be offset by income received by the ETF. Each Short ETF’s strategy will cap potential gains if its reference asset decreases in value yet subjects an investor to all potential losses if the reference asset increases in value. Such potential losses may not be offset by income received by the ETF.
    5ROC refers to Return of Capital. The ROC percentage indicates how much the distribution reflects an investor’s initial investment. The figures shown for each Fund in the table above are estimates and may later be determined to be taxable net investment income, short-term gains, long-term gains (to the extent permitted by law), or return of capital. Actual amounts and sources for tax reporting will depend upon the Fund’s investment activities during the remainder of the fiscal year and may be subject to changes based on tax regulations. Your broker will send you a Form 1099-DIV for the calendar year to tell you how to report these distributions for federal income tax purposes.

    Each Fund has a limited operating history and while each Fund’s objective is to provide current income, there is no guarantee the Fund will make a distribution. Distributions are likely to vary greatly in amount.

    Important Information

    This material must be preceded or accompanied by the prospectus. For all prospectuses, click here.

    Contact Vince DiLullo vdilullo@tidalfg.com for more information.

    Tidal Financial Group is the adviser for all YieldMax® ETFs.

    THE FUND, TRUST, AND ADVISER ARE NOT AFFILIATED WITH ANY UNDERLYING REFERENCE ASSET.

    Risk Disclosures (applicable to all YieldMax ETFs referenced above, except the Short ETFs)

    YMAX, YMAG, FEAT and FIVY generally invest in other YieldMax® ETFs. As such, these two Funds are subject to the risks listed in this section, which apply to all the YieldMax® ETFs they may hold from time to time.

    Investing involves risk. Principal loss is possible.

    Referenced Index Risk. The Fund invests in options contracts that are based on the value of the Index (or the Index ETFs). This subjects the Fund to certain of the same risks as if it owned shares of companies that comprised the Index or an ETF that tracks the Index, even though it does not.

    Indirect Investment Risk. The Index is not affiliated with the Trust, the Fund, the Adviser, or their respective affiliates and is not involved with this offering in any way. Investors in the Fund will not have the right to receive dividends or other distributions or any other rights with respect to the companies that comprise the Index but will be subject to declines in the performance of the Index.

    Russell 2000 Index Risks. The Index, which consists of small-cap U.S. companies, is particularly susceptible to economic changes, as these firms often have less financial resilience than larger companies. Market volatility can disproportionately affect these smaller businesses, leading to significant price swings. Additionally, these companies are often more exposed to specific industry risks and have less diverse revenue streams. They can also be more vulnerable to changes in domestic regulatory or policy environments.

    Call Writing Strategy Risk. The path dependency (i.e., the continued use) of the Fund’s call writing strategy will impact the extent that the Fund participates in the positive price returns of the underlying reference asset and, in turn, the Fund’s returns, both during the term of the sold call options and over longer periods.

    Counterparty Risk. The Fund is subject to counterparty risk by virtue of its investments in options contracts. Transactions in some types of derivatives, including options, are required to be centrally cleared (“cleared derivatives”). In a transaction involving cleared derivatives, the Fund’s counterparty is a clearing house rather than a bank or broker. Since the Fund is not a member of clearing houses and only members of a clearing house (“clearing members”) can participate directly in the clearing house, the Fund will hold cleared derivatives through accounts at clearing members.

    Derivatives Risk. Derivatives are financial instruments that derive value from the underlying reference asset or assets, such as stocks, bonds, or funds (including ETFs), interest rates or indexes. The Fund’s investments in derivatives may pose risks in addition to, and greater than, those associated with directly investing in securities or other ordinary investments, including risk related to the market, imperfect correlation with underlying investments or the Fund’s other portfolio holdings, higher price volatility, lack of availability, counterparty risk, liquidity, valuation and legal restrictions.

    Options Contracts. The use of options contracts involves investment strategies and risks different from those associated with ordinary portfolio securities transactions. The prices of options are volatile and are influenced by, among other things, actual and anticipated changes in the value of the underlying instrument, including the anticipated volatility, which are affected by fiscal and monetary policies and by national and international political, changes in the actual or implied volatility or the reference asset, the time remaining until the expiration of the option contract and economic events.

    Distribution Risk. As part of the Fund’s investment objective, the Fund seeks to provide current income. There is no assurance that the Fund will make a distribution in any given period. If the Fund does make distributions, the amounts of such distributions will likely vary greatly from one distribution to the next.

    High Portfolio Turnover Risk. The Fund may actively and frequently trade all or a significant portion of the Fund’s holdings. A high portfolio turnover rate increases transaction costs, which may increase the Fund’s expenses.

    Liquidity Risk. Some securities held by the Fund, including options contracts, may be difficult to sell or be illiquid, particularly during times of market turmoil.

    Non-Diversification Risk. Because the Fund is “non-diversified,” it may invest a greater percentage of its assets in the securities of a single issuer or a smaller number of issuers than if it was a diversified fund.

    New Fund Risk. The Fund is a recently organized management investment company with no operating history. As a result, prospective investors do not have a track record or history on which to base their investment decisions.

    Price Participation Risk. The Fund employs an investment strategy that includes the sale of call option contracts, which limits the degree to which the Fund will participate in increases in value experienced by the underlying reference asset over the Call Period.

    Single Issuer Risk. Issuer-specific attributes may cause an investment in the Fund to be more volatile than a traditional pooled investment which diversifies risk or the market generally. The value of the Fund, which focuses on an individual security (ARKK, TSLA, AAPL, NVDA, AMZN, META, GOOGL, NFLX, COIN, MSFT, DIS, XOM, JPM, AMD, PYPL, SQ, MRNA, AI, MSTR, Bitcoin ETP, GDX®, SNOW, ABNB, BABA, TSM, SMCI, PLTR, MARA, CVNA), may be more volatile than a traditional pooled investment or the market as a whole and may perform differently from the value of a traditional pooled investment or the market as a whole.

    Inflation Risk. Inflation risk is the risk that the value of assets or income from investments will be less in the future as inflation decreases the value of money. As inflation increases, the present value of the Fund’s assets and distributions, if any, may decline.

    Indirect Investment Risk. The Index is not affiliated with the Trust, the Fund, the Adviser, or their respective affiliates and is not involved with this offering in any way.

    Risk Disclosures (applicable only to GPTY)

    Artificial Intelligence Risk. Issuers engaged in artificial intelligence typically have high research and capital expenditures and, as a result, their profitability can vary widely, if they are profitable at all. The space in which they are engaged is highly competitive and issuers’ products and services may become obsolete very quickly. These companies are heavily dependent on intellectual property rights and may be adversely affected by loss or impairment of those rights. The issuers are also subject to legal, regulatory, and political changes that may have a large impact on their profitability. A failure in an issuer’s product or even questions about the safety of the product could be devastating to the issuer, especially if it is the marquee product of the issuer. It can be difficult to accurately capture what qualifies as an artificial intelligence company.

    Technology Sector Risk. The Fund will invest substantially in companies in the information technology sector, and therefore the performance of the Fund could be negatively impacted by events affecting this sector. Market or economic factors impacting technology companies and companies that rely heavily on technological advances could have a significant effect on the value of the Fund’s investments. The value of stocks of information technology companies and companies that rely heavily on technology is particularly vulnerable to rapid changes in technology product cycles, rapid product obsolescence, government regulation and competition, both domestically and internationally, including competition from foreign competitors with lower production costs. Stocks of information technology companies and companies that rely heavily on technology, especially those of smaller, less-seasoned companies, tend to be more volatile than the overall market. Information technology companies are heavily dependent on patent and intellectual property rights, the loss or impairment of which may adversely affect profitability.

    Risk Disclosure (applicable only to MARO)

    Digital Assets Risk: The Fund does not invest directly in Bitcoin or any other digital assets. The Fund does not invest directly in derivatives that track the performance of Bitcoin or any other digital assets. The Fund does not invest in or seek direct exposure to the current “spot” or cash price of Bitcoin. Investors seeking direct exposure to the price of Bitcoin should consider an investment other than the Fund. Digital assets like Bitcoin, designed as mediums of exchange, are still an emerging asset class. They operate independently of any central authority or government backing and are subject to regulatory changes and extreme price volatility.

    Risk Disclosures (applicable only to BABO and TSMY)

    Currency Risk: Indirect exposure to foreign currencies subjects the Fund to the risk that currencies will decline in value relative to the U.S. dollar. Currency rates in foreign countries may fluctuate significantly over short periods of time for a number of reasons, including changes in interest rates and the imposition of currency controls or other political developments in the U.S. or abroad.

    Depositary Receipts Risk: The securities underlying BABO and TSMY are American Depositary Receipts (“ADRs”). Investment in ADRs may be less liquid than the underlying shares in their primary trading market.

    Foreign Market and Trading Risk: The trading markets for many foreign securities are not as active as U.S. markets and may have less governmental regulation and oversight.

    Foreign Securities Risk: Investments in securities of non-U.S. issuers involve certain risks that may not be present with investments in securities of U.S. issuers, such as risk of loss due to foreign currency fluctuations or to political or economic instability, as well as varying regulatory requirements applicable to investments in non-U.S. issuers. There may be less information publicly available about a non-U.S. issuer than a U.S. issuer. Non-U.S. issuers may also be subject to different regulatory, accounting, auditing, financial reporting, and investor protection standards than U.S. issuers.

    Risk Disclosures (applicable only to GDXY)

    Risk of Investing in Foreign Securities. The Fund is exposed indirectly to the securities of foreign issuers selected by GDX®’s investment adviser, which subjects the Fund to the risks associated with such companies. Investments in the securities of foreign issuers involve risks beyond those associated with investments in U.S. securities.

    Risk of Investing in Gold and Silver Mining Companies. The Fund is exposed indirectly to gold and silver mining companies selected by GDX®’s investment adviser, which subjects the Fund to the risks associated with such companies.

    The Fund invests in options contracts based on the value of the VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX®), which subjects the Fund to some of the same risks as if it owned GDX®, as well as the risks associated with Canadian, Australian and Emerging Market Issuers, and Small-and Medium-Capitalization companies.

    Risk Disclosures (applicable only to YBIT)

    YBIT does not invest directly in Bitcoin or any other digital assets. YBIT does not invest directly in derivatives that track the performance of Bitcoin or any other digital assets. YBIT does not invest in or seek direct exposure to the current “spot” or cash price of Bitcoin. Investors seeking direct exposure to the price of Bitcoin should consider an investment other than YBIT.

    Bitcoin Investment Risk: The Fund’s indirect investment in Bitcoin, through holdings in one or more Underlying ETPs, exposes it to the unique risks of this emerging innovation. Bitcoin’s price is highly volatile, and its market is influenced by the changing Bitcoin network, fluctuating acceptance levels, and unpredictable usage trends.

    Digital Assets Risk: Digital assets like Bitcoin, designed as mediums of exchange, are still an emerging asset class. They operate independently of any central authority or government backing and are subject to regulatory changes and extreme price volatility. Potentially No 1940 Act Protections. As of the date of this Prospectus, there is only a single eligible Underlying ETP, and it is an investment company subject to the 1940 Act.

    Bitcoin ETP Risk: The Fund invests in options contracts that are based on the value of the Bitcoin ETP. This subjects the Fund to certain of the same risks as if it owned shares of the Bitcoin ETP, even though it does not. Bitcoin ETPs are subject, but not limited, to significant risk and heightened volatility. An investor in a Bitcoin ETP may lose their entire investment. Bitcoin ETPs are not suitable for all investors. In addition, not all Bitcoin ETPs are registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940. Those Bitcoin ETPs that are not registered under such statute are therefore not subject to the same regulations as exchange traded products that are so registered.

    Risk Disclosures (applicable only to the Short ETFs)

    Investing involves risk. Principal loss is possible.

    Price Appreciation Risk. As part of the Fund’s synthetic covered put strategy, the Fund purchases and sells call and put option contracts that are based on the value of the underlying reference asset. This strategy subjects the Fund to certain of the same risks as if it shorted the underlying reference asset, even though it does not. By virtue of the Fund’s indirect inverse exposure to changes in the value of the underlying reference asset, the Fund is subject to the risk that the value of the underlying reference asset increases. If the value of the underlying reference asset increases, the Fund will likely lose value and, as a result, the Fund may suffer significant losses.

    Put Writing Strategy Risk. The path dependency (i.e., the continued use) of the Fund’s put writing (selling) strategy will impact the extent that the Fund participates in decreases in the value of the underlying reference asset and, in turn, the Fund’s returns, both during the term of the sold put options and over longer periods.

    Purchased OTM Call Options Risk. The Fund’s strategy is subject to potential losses if the underlying reference asset increases in value, which may not be offset by the purchase of out-of-the-money (OTM) call options. The Fund purchases OTM calls to seek to manage (cap) the Fund’s potential losses from the Fund’s short exposure to the underlying reference asset if it appreciates significantly in value. However, the OTM call options will cap the Fund’s losses only to the extent that the value of the underlying reference asset increases to a level that is at or above the strike level of the purchased OTM call options. Any increase in the value of the underlying reference asset to a level that is below the strike level of the purchased OTM call options will result in a corresponding loss for the Fund. For example, if the OTM call options have a strike level that is approximately 100% above the then-current value of the underlying reference asset at the time of the call option purchase, and the value of the underlying reference asset increases by at least 100% during the term of the purchased OTM call options, the Fund will lose all its value. Since the Fund bears the costs of purchasing the OTM calls, such costs will decrease the Fund’s value and/or any income otherwise generated by the Fund’s investment strategy.

    Counterparty Risk. The Fund is subject to counterparty risk by virtue of its investments in options contracts. Transactions in some types of derivatives, including options, are required to be centrally cleared (“cleared derivatives”). In a transaction involving cleared derivatives, the Fund’s counterparty is a clearing house rather than a bank or broker. Since the Fund is not a member of clearing houses and only members of a clearing house (“clearing members”) can participate directly in the clearing house, the Fund will hold cleared derivatives through accounts at clearing members.

    Derivatives Risk. Derivatives are financial instruments that derive value from the underlying reference asset or assets, such as stocks, bonds, or funds (including ETFs), interest rates or indexes. The Fund’s investments in derivatives may pose risks in addition to, and greater than, those associated with directly investing in securities or other ordinary investments, including risk related to the market, imperfect correlation with underlying investments or the Fund’s other portfolio holdings, higher price volatility, lack of availability, counterparty risk, liquidity, valuation and legal restrictions.

    Options Contracts. The use of options contracts involves investment strategies and risks different from those associated with ordinary portfolio securities transactions. The prices of options are volatile and are influenced by, among other things, actual and anticipated changes in the value of the underlying reference asset, including the anticipated volatility, which are affected by fiscal and monetary policies and by national and international political, changes in the actual or implied volatility or the reference asset, the time remaining until the expiration of the option contract and economic events.

    Distribution Risk. As part of the Fund’s investment objective, the Fund seeks to provide current income. There is no assurance that the Fund will make a distribution in any given period. If the Fund does make distributions, the amounts of such distributions will likely vary greatly from one distribution to the next.

    High Portfolio Turnover Risk. The Fund may actively and frequently trade all or a significant portion of the Fund’s holdings.

    Liquidity Risk. Some securities held by the Fund, including options contracts, may be difficult to sell or be illiquid, particularly during times of market turmoil.

    Non-Diversification Risk. Because the Fund is “non-diversified,” it may invest a greater percentage of its assets in the securities of a single issuer or a smaller number of issuers than if it was a diversified fund.

    New Fund Risk. The Fund is a recently organized management investment company with no operating history. As a result, prospective investors do not have a track record or history on which to base their investment decisions.

    Price Participation Risk. The Fund employs an investment strategy that includes the sale of put option contracts, which limits the degree to which the Fund will participate in decreases in value experienced by the underlying reference asset over the Put Period.

    Single Issuer Risk. Issuer-specific attributes may cause an investment in the Fund to be more volatile than a traditional pooled investment which diversifies risk or the market generally. The value of the Fund, for any Fund that focuses on an individual security (e.g., TSLA, COIN, NVDA, MSTR), may be more volatile than a traditional pooled investment or the market as a whole and may perform differently from the value of a traditional pooled investment or the market as a whole. Inflation Risk. Inflation risk is the risk that the value of assets or income from investments will be less in the future as inflation decreases the value of money. As inflation increases, the present value of the Fund’s assets and distributions, if any, may decline.

    Risk Disclosures (applicable only to CHPY)

    Semiconductor Industry Risk. Semiconductor companies may face intense competition, both domestically and internationally, and such competition may have an adverse effect on their profit margins. Semiconductor companies may have limited product lines, markets, financial resources or personnel. Semiconductor companies’ supply chain and operations are dependent on the availability of materials that meet exacting standards and the use of third parties to provide components and services.

    The products of semiconductor companies may face obsolescence due to rapid technological developments and frequent new product introduction, unpredictable changes in growth rates and competition for the services of qualified personnel. Capital equipment expenditures could be substantial, and equipment generally suffers from rapid obsolescence. Companies in the semiconductor industry are heavily dependent on patent and intellectual property rights. The loss or impairment of these rights would adversely affect the profitability of these companies.

    Risk Disclosures (applicable only to YQQQ)

    Index Overview. The Nasdaq 100 Index is a benchmark index that includes 100 of the largest non-financial companies listed on the Nasdaq Stock Market, based on market capitalization.

    Index Level Appreciation Risk. As part of the Fund’s synthetic covered put strategy, the Fund purchases and sells call and put option contracts that are based on the Index level. This strategy subjects the Fund to certain of the same risks as if it shorted the Index, even though it does not. By virtue of the Fund’s indirect inverse exposure to changes in the Index level, the Fund is subject to the risk that the Index level increases. If the Index level increases, the Fund will likely lose value and, as a result, the Fund may suffer significant losses. The Fund may also be subject to the following risks: innovation and technological advancement; strong market presence of Index constituent companies; adaptability to global market trends; and resilience and recovery potential.

    Index Level Participation Risk. The Fund employs an investment strategy that includes the sale of put option contracts, which limits the degree to which the Fund will benefit from decreases in the Index level experienced over the Put Period. This means that if the Index level experiences a decrease in value below the strike level of the sold put options during a Put Period, the Fund will likely not experience that increase to the same extent and any Fund gains may significantly differ from the level of the Index losses over the Put Period. Additionally, because the Fund is limited in the degree to which it will participate in decreases in value experienced by the Index level over each Put Period, but has significant negative exposure to any increases in value experienced by the Index level over the Put Period, the NAV of the Fund may decrease over any given period. The Fund’s NAV is dependent on the value of each options portfolio, which is based principally upon the inverse of the performance of the Index level. The Fund’s ability to benefit from the Index level decreases will depend on prevailing market conditions, especially market volatility, at the time the Fund enters into the sold put option contracts and will vary from Put Period to Put Period. The value of the options contracts is affected by changes in the value and dividend rates of component companies that comprise the Index, changes in interest rates, changes in the actual or perceived volatility of the Index and the remaining time to the options’ expiration, as well as trading conditions in the options market. As the Index level changes and time moves towards the expiration of each Put Period, the value of the options contracts, and therefore the Fund’s NAV, will change. However, it is not expected for the Fund’s NAV to directly inversely correlate on a day-to-day basis with the returns of the Index level. The amount of time remaining until the options contract’s expiration date affects the impact that the value of the options contracts has on the Fund’s NAV, which may not be in full effect until the expiration date of the Fund’s options contracts. Therefore, while changes in the Index level will result in changes to the Fund’s NAV, the Fund generally anticipates that the rate of change in the Fund’s NAV will be different than the inverse of the changes experienced by the Index level.

    YieldMax® ETFs are distributed by Foreside Fund Services, LLC. Foreside is not affiliated with Tidal Financial Group, or YieldMax® ETFs.

    © 2025 YieldMax® ETFs

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI Europe: ECB reports on Bulgaria’s progress towards euro adoption

    Source: European Central Bank

    4 June 2025

    • ECB report assesses Bulgaria’s progress towards Economic and Monetary Union
    • Positive assessment with respect to possible euro adoption on 1 January 2026

    Bulgaria has made good progress towards economic convergence with the euro area since 2024, according to the Convergence Report of the European Central Bank (ECB) published today.

    “This positive assessment of convergence paves the way for Bulgaria to introduce the euro as of 1 January 2026 and become the 21st EU Member State to join the euro area,” said Philip R. Lane, Member of the ECB Executive Board. “I wish to congratulate Bulgaria on its tremendous dedication to making the adjustments needed.”

    According to the ECB’s assessment, Bulgaria is within the reference values of the convergence criteria and complies with the legal requirements. Having participated in the exchange rate mechanism (ERM II) and the banking union since 10 July 2020, Bulgaria has made another step towards European integration under challenging economic conditions. Achieving an environment that is conducive to sustainable convergence in Bulgaria requires stability-oriented economic policies and wide-ranging structural reforms. These policies are discussed in more detail in the report.

    As regards the price stability criterion, in April 2025, the 12-month average rate of HICP inflation in Bulgaria stood at 2.7%, i.e. just below the reference value of 2.8% (Chart 1). The reference value is based on the three best performing Member States in terms of price stability, i.e. Ireland (1.2%), Finland (1.3%) and Italy (1.4%), taking their average inflation over the past 12 months and adding 1.5 percentage points.

    Chart 1

    HICP inflation and reference value

    (annual percentage changes)

    Sources: European Commission (Eurostat) and ECB calculations.
    Notes: 12-month moving average rounded to one decimal.

    Regarding the fiscal criterion, Bulgaria has not been subject to an excessive deficit procedure since 2012. The country’s general government budget deficit stood at 3.0% of GDP in 2024, i.e. at the level of the 3% reference value (Chart 2). Its general government gross debt-to-GDP ratio stood at 24.1%, i.e. well below the 60% reference value, and it has been well below 60% of GDP for the past 20 years.

    Chart 2

    General government balance and debt

    (as a percentage of GDP)

    Sources: European System of Central Banks and European Commission (Eurostat).

    As regards the exchange rate criterion, the Bulgarian lev participated in ERM II in the two-year reference period from 20 May 2023 to 19 May 2025. Over the reference period, the lev did not exhibit any deviation from the central rate of 1.95583 levs per euro. Bulgaria has completed almost all of its ERM II post-entry commitments, but further progress is needed to address the outstanding shortcomings in the area of anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism.

    Long-term interest rates in Bulgaria stood at 3.9%, on average, over the reference period from May 2024 to April 2025 and were therefore below the 5.1% reference value for the interest rate convergence criterion.

    As for the compatibility of national legislation, Bulgarian law is compatible with the Treaties and the Statute of the ESCB, as required under Article 131 of the Treaty.

    Today’s report was published following Bulgaria’s request, the next regular Convergence Report of the ECB will be published in 2026.

    For media queries, please contact Benoit Deeg, tel.: +49 172 1683704.

    Notes

    • European Commission Convergence Report 2025
    • Close cooperation established between ECB and Bulgaria
    • The Convergence Report of the ECB reviews the economic and legal convergence of non-euro area EU Member States with a derogation every second year or at the request of a specific country. It assesses the degree of sustainable economic convergence with the euro area, whether the national legislation is compatible with the EU legal framework, and whether the statutory requirements are fulfilled for the respective national central banks. Given its “opt-out” clause, Denmark is not covered by this assessment unless this is specifically requested by the country.
    • The cut-off date for the statistics included in this Convergence Report was 19 May 2025. The reference period for the price stability criterion and the long-term interest rate criterion is from May 2024 to April 2025. Forecasts are based on the European Commission’s Spring 2025 Economic Forecast and other information relevant to a forward-looking assessment of the sustainability of convergence.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Foreign minister Caspar Veldkamp to temporarily take over Foreign Trade and Development portfolio

    Source: Government of the Netherlands

    On June 3, 2025, Prime Minister Dick Schoof tendered the resignation of the members of government belonging to the Freedom Party (PVV) to His Majesty the King. All other ministers and state secretaries will continue in the capacity of a caretaker government. For the time being, Minister of Foreign Affairs Caspar Veldkamp will take over the duties of former foreign trade and development minister Reinette Klever.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Chancellor unveils biggest ever investment in city region local transport

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Speech

    Chancellor unveils biggest ever investment in city region local transport

    Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves spoke at Mellor Bus Factory in Rochdale on 4 June 2025.

    It’s fantastic to be in Rochdale, at Mellor Bus Factory;  

    Not just a good local business; although it is that 

    But also a key part of the Bee Network supply chain. 

    And good to see so many familiar faces here – including the leaders of some of our local councillors.  

    Eleven months ago today, this government was elected on a promise of change. 

    To deliver security for working people and renewal for our country.  

    To build a stronger, and more resilient Britain; 

    A country built on, and powered through, the contribution of people in all parts of our country. 

    Today, I will set out more of our plans to make that a reality.

    I know how hard the last few years have been for so many people.  

    I have always been clear that the central challenge facing this government is to improve living standards and to renew our public services. 

    And that the only sustainable way to do that is to turn around Britain’s growth performance after fourteen wasted years. 

    To put more money in people’s pockets; 

    To revive our high streets; 

    To give our children the opportunities that they need to succeed. 

    Put simply: to make working people –to make our country – better off.

    The central barrier to economic growth has been underinvestment.  

    For too long, Britain has lagged behind every other G7 economy when it comes to business investment as a share of GDP; 

    One of the consequences was that the last Parliament was the worst on record for living standards.  

    This government’s economic strategy is designed to fix that problem, underpinned by the three pillars that I set out before the election: 

    First, stability – so that investors, businesses and families have the confidence to plan for the future; 

    Second, reform – to remove the barriers that get in the way of so much potential; 

    And third, investment – the lifeblood of growth, and therefore of living standards. 

    My cabinet colleagues and I have wasted no time in pursuing this agenda: 

    Overhauling our planning system – the single greatest barrier that businesses told me was standing in their way… 

    … starting, in our first week in office, with the biggest reforms to our planning system in a generation; 

    Launching Britain’s first National Wealth Fund, to help mobilise more than £70billion of private sector investment into some of the industries of the future like clean energy, defence and tech; 

    Reforming our pensions system, to unlock billions of  pounds of investment in British assets; 

    Forging three new major trade deals to save and create jobs – with India, the United States and the European Union – covering steel, manufacturing, and agriculture 

    And, alongside that, we will be shaping a modern industrial strategy and ten-year infrastructure strategy, bringing together government, business and working people, to focus on the high potential parts of our economy and our future.

    We have already made significant progress:  

    While it is just one quarter, the most recent numbers showed Britain to be the fastest growing economy in the G7;

    And real wages rose by more in less than ten months [redacted political content].

    But we know that not enough people are feeling that yet; 

    That trust remains low, and prosperity is too narrowly shared; 

    I know that we must do more.  

    In a week’s time, I will set out a spending review targeted squarely on the renewal of Britain; 

    Focused on the priorities of working people;  

    By investing in our security, in our health, and in our economic growth. 

    To deliver on the promise of change to make you and your family better off.

    I have long said that the only viable strategy for growth today is one that builds on strong and broad foundations.  

    A Britain that is better off cannot rely on a handful of places forging ahead of the rest; 

    And so we must reject once and for all the exhausted idea that a strong economy can be powered by just a few people, just a few industries, just a few parts of the country.  

    The result of such thinking has been growth created in too few places, and too few people feeling the benefits; 

    Wide gaps between regions, and between our cities and towns; 

    A sense of injustice, as our social contract frays;  

    And diminishing returns for growth and productivity.  

    For every success story, and there are many, there is potential held back:

    By the long legacy of deindustrialisation [redacted political content] that consigned whole industries – and whole communities that depended upon them – to decline;  

    And, yes, by spending decisions made down in London.

    I’ve been a Leeds MP for fifteen years, another great city.  

    Like so many of my colleagues, wherever they represent – and so many of our constituents – I am painfully familiar with big promises that come to nothing.  

    The frustration people feel, as good work and opportunity slip away; 

    While young people are presented with a choice to stay close to home where they want to be, or to move away to find a better job, paying better wages.  

    Families wrenched apart or opportunities missed out on.  

    No one should have to make that choice.  

    So, that is why I and my colleagues are determined to change things.  

    Because I know there is brilliant talent to be found right across our country. 

    I can see the potential in all our towns and our cities; 

    The creativity and scientific rigour in our universities; 

    The leading businesses pushing at the frontier… 

    … in sectors that will be at the core of our modern industrial strategy – in tech, energy, transport, and finance. 

    I see that potential everywhere that I go. 

    I know that a prosperous United Kingdom depends on the economic strength of all its parts. 

    And on the contribution of working people everywhere.   

    And that is why, this autumn, I will be partnering with the Business Secretary, and with the mayor of the West Midlands, Richard Parker, to host a Regional Investment Summit…  

    … to showcase the investment potential that all of our regions have to offer.

    Over the next week, you will hear a lot of debate about my so-called “self-imposed” fiscal rules.  

    Now, contrary to some conventional wisdom, I didn’t come into politics because I care passionately about fiscal rules. 

    I came into politics because I want to make a difference to the lives of working people.  

    Because I believe – [redacted political content] –  that every person should have the same opportunities as others to thrive and succeed… 

    … no matter what their parents do…  

    … no matter where they grow up.  

    And because I know that economic responsibility and social justice go hand in hand. 

    After 2022, no one should need to be told about the dangers of reckless borrowing for the financial security of ordinary families.

    [redacted political content]

    And the results would be the same:  

    Market instability and interest rates rising… 

    … with soaring rents and thousands of pounds extra on families’ mortgages…Businesses would pay more for their borrowing and 

    Pensions that people save hard for would be put in peril, again. 

    I would never take those risks. [redacted political content].

    Strong and transparent fiscal rules are an indispensable safeguard for working people – and that is why my rules are non-negotiable. 

    So let’s be clear:  

    It is not me ‘imposing’ borrowing limits on government… 

    Those limits are the product of economic reality. 

    So fiscal rules do matter.

    [redacted political content]

    At the budget last year, I changed Britain’s fiscal rules to better serve both stability and investment, giving us the strong foundations that we need to renew our country as we promised. 

    The first rule is for stability: 

    That day-to-day government spending should be paid for by tax receipts.  

    That is the sound economic choice; 

    And it is the fair choice – because it is not right to expect future generations to pay for the services we rely on today.

    [redacted political content]

    Instead, we inherited a total mess:  

    A £22 billion black hole in day-to-day spending, and debt at its highest level since the early 1960s…  

    … and yet, at the same time public services at breaking point.  

    Last year, I made the decisions I judged right and necessary to get Britain on a sound financial footing…  

    … and to provide the urgent resource that our public services needed. 

    That is why I made decisions – some of them extremely difficult, and certainly not all of them popular – to raise taxes on business and indeed on the wealthiest in the budget; 

    Enabling a £190 billion real-terms increase over the Spending Review period [redacted political content]…

    … spending for our schools, our hospitals, and our police the services upon which we all rely. 

    Even with those decisions and even with that injection of cash, not every department will get everything that they want next week;  

    And I have had to say no to things that I want to do, too.  

    But that is not because of my fiscal rules; 

    It is the result of [redacted political content].

    It is the stability that my rules supports, and the choices we made as a government in October, that have helped facilitate four cuts to interest rates since the last election – saving £650 a year for a family taking out a new, typical two-year fixed-rate mortgage. 

    My second fiscal rule is what enables us to invest in Britain’s economic renewal – to keep Britain’s public sector debt on a sustainable path, while allowing government to invest in the infrastructure that will provide stronger growth in future.  

    The decisions that we made in October meant that, for the first time, the Treasury takes account of the benefits, and not just the costs, of investment. 

    Together the fiscal rules mean that, unlike our predecessors, we will not be balancing the books by cutting investment.  

    And that is why we can increase investment by over £113 billion more than the last government plans; 

    Meaning public investment will be at its highest sustained level since the 1970s. 

    Combined, these changes deliver over £300 billion of extra spending across five years, on our public services and on our economic future. 

    Britain faces a binary choice – investment, or decline.  

    And I choose investment.

    Because I believe in an entrepreneurial, and an active state; 

    And I reject wholeheartedly the old-fashioned, dogmatic view that the only good thing a government can do is to get out of the way. 

    These choices, that I am making, are about realising that entrepreneurial, and active state. 

    At the spending review, I will set out, in detail, the allocation of those additional resources – to power growth and renew our public services. 

    The choice is already clear:

    [redacted political content] we offer change.  

    Change that we can now deliver, because of the choices we have made.

    Today, I can tell you about one part of those investments. 

    They are underpinned by a step change in how government approaches and evaluates the case for investing in all of our regions. 

    The Treasury Green Book sets the guidance for how public servants assess the value for money of government projects. It may sound dry, but it’s one of the reasons why there hasn’t been enough investment in the North and Midlands for decades. 

    I have heard from mayors across the country – from Andy, but also from Steve Rotheram, the mayor of Liverpool– that previous governments have wielded the Green Book against them as an excuse to deny important investment in their areas and their people. 

    That’s why, in January, I ordered a review of the Green Book and how it is being used, to make sure that this government gives every region a fair hearing when it comes to investment. 

    I will publish the full conclusions of that review next week. 

    However, I can tell you now, that it will mark a new approach to decision-making in government; 

    And an end to siloed Whitehall thinking… 

    … making sure that government is taking account of the reinforcing economic effects of infrastructure investments, in housing, in skills and in jobs; 

    To invest in all our nations and regions, not just a few.

    Next week, I will set out our plans in full – for England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland; in housing, in energy, in roads and in rail. 

    But today, I want to tell you about just one part of our plan – renewing our transport systems in England’s largest mayoral regions, including here in Greater Manchester and across the North and the Midlands. 

    Because connectivity is an absolutely critical factor in unlocking the potential of towns and cities outside of London; 

    One of the areas in which previous governments have promised most, but delivered least. And that will now change.

    Let me tell you why it matters. 

    Modern growth rests on dynamic, connected city-regions;  

    Creating clusters of activity so that people can get around… 

    … communicate… 

    … share ideas…  

    … commute… 

    … find good work… 

    … and earn wages that flow back into strong local economies. 

    Stronger transport links within cities and the towns around them create opportunity by connecting labour markets… 

    … and making it easier for firms to buy and sell goods and services in different places, to different people.

    [redacted political content] strong investment in the past in strongly integrated transport systems, including in London, helps explain London’s  global success, and also its advantage over other UK cities.   

    We want London to succeed.

    But it is the lack of that infrastructure which puts England’s other great cities – Birmingham, Liverpool, Newcastle – at a disadvantage compared to their European counterparts that have this infrastructure. 

    That helps to explain our underperformance relative to other European economies. 

    If we were to increase the productivity of those second cities in the UK to match the national average, our economy would be £86 billion larger. 

    And so, because this government believes that prosperity must come from the contribution of us all… 

    Because all of the sizeable evidence that public investment can crowd in many times its volume in private investments… 

    And because we know the potential that exists in all of our towns and cities…  

    … I can tell you today that we will be making the biggest ever investment by a British government in transport links within our city regions, and their surrounding towns; 

    £15.6 billion in transport funding settlements, to be delivered by our regional mayors;  

    More than doubling real-terms spending on city-region connectivity.

    [redacted political content]

    Thanks to the changes to our fiscal framework announced in the budget – this government now does have the money to fund it. 

    And that money is going to our mayors, to deliver on the priorities of their communities: 

    New trams, new train stations, and bus routes to link up our towns and cities; 

    Unlocking new homes, new jobs, new investment and leisure opportunities across our regions.  

    Let me take you through those city regional investments in turn. 

    Investment in Greater Manchester… 

    … to help make the Bee Network, that is built here in Rochdale, the UK’s first fully integrated, zero-emission public transport system by 2030… 

    … with new tram stops in Bury, North Manchester and Oldham… 

    … and a new Metrolink extension to Stockport…  

    … meaning shorter commutes into central Manchester… 

    … making sure that ninety percent of Greater Manchester residents will live within a five-minute walk of a bus or tram that comes at least once every half-hour… 

    … and opening up connections for people in Bury, in Heywood, in Rochdale and in Oldham to the tens of thousands of new jobs at the Northern Gateway.  

    Investment in the Liverpool city region…  

    … backing the mayor Steve Rotheram, to deliver three new rapid bus routes… 

    … linking up the city centre, John Lennon Airport, Anfield, the new Everton stadium on Bramley-Moore Dock, and new homes built on the Central Docks redevelopment; 

    Alongside the largest ever investment in Merseyside railway stations, to serve Halton, St Helens, and Woodchurch;  

    Investment in West Yorkshire, so that Tracy Brabin can fulfil her manifesto commitment to the people of West Yorkshire to deliver the Mass Transit system…  

    … with spades in the ground by 2028, unlocking in the process over seven thousand new homes… 

    Improving local transport for 700,000 people… 

    To link up Bradford, Kirklees, Calderdale, Wakefield, Pudsey, and Leeds…  

    … the largest city in western Europe without a light rail or metro system – but not for much longer. 

    Investment in the North East…  

    … to allow our mayor Kim McGuinness to extend the Tyne and Wear Metro…  

    … linking Washington with Newcastle and Sunderland…  

    … and – in line with our industrial strategy priorities – strengthening one of the largest advanced manufacturing zones in Europe, connecting Nissan and the businesses in its supply chain to a wider pool of talent. 

    Investment in South Yorkshire, supporting our mayor Oliver Coppard… 

    … so that, in addition to the reopening of Doncaster Airport…  

    … he can renew the existing, and now publicly controlled, Supertram network… 

    … with track replacements, overhead line maintenance, and rolling stock renewal 

    … with a full fleet of new vehicles by 2032… 

    … a bigger and better integrated transport network… 

    … linking jobs and homes in Sheffield and Rotherham. 

    Investment in the West of England…  

    … backing the mayor Helen Godwin’s plans for mass transit development across the region… 

    … and improved rail infrastructure, to help unlock more services between Brabazon and the city centre… 

    … meaning shorter journey times to Bristol Temple Meads from across the wider area. 

    Investment in the Tees Valley, in Middlesborough station, unblocking local networks and increasing capacity on local lines; 

    Investment in the East Midlands, so that our mayor Claire Ward can forge the Trent Arc – linking Derby and Nottingham to create tens of thousands of new jobs and homes… 

    … connecting Infinity Park Investment Zone and the East Midlands Freeport, with sites including Ratcliffe-on-Soar, clean energy and advanced manufacturing, and East Midlands Intermodal Park, home of Toyota in the region, along the Trent Arc Corridor; 

    And investment in the West Midlands, backing our mayor Richard Parker’s plans for a metro extension from Birmingham city centre to the new Sports Quarter – to unlock more than £3 billion of private investment in an area with some of the lowest levels of economic activity in all of theUK… 

    … with the potential to create more than 8,000 jobs and catalyse the regeneration of East Birmingham and of Solihull.  

    For people living in some of our biggest cities and the towns around them, these measures will mean shorter commute times;  

    They will mean good work, and money flowing back into local economies; 

    They will mean businesses connecting with workers, customers, and supply chains;  

    They will mean the revival of high streets;

    They will mean young people able to stay close to homes and pursue the opportunities that they dream of; 

    It will mean more growth, more parts of our country benefitting, and more people and more places across the UK feeling better off.  

    In short – they will mean the renewal of our cities and our towns all across the UK.

    As we build train stations, tram lines and buses, that will mean orders for steel made here in Britain.  

    Six weeks ago, this government was presented with a choice.  

    To allow British Steel in Scunthorpe to close, or to intervene – in a way that British governments have been too reluctant to do for far too long.  

    In opposition, I promised that our economic policy would be guided by what I call “securonomics”. 

    A belief that an active state should, and would, take the necessary action to provide security for families and resilience for our national economy.  

    That we would end the days when governments turned a blind eye to where things are made and who makes them. 

    And I meant what I said. 

    And so I was not prepared to tolerate a situation in which Britain’s steel capacity was fundamentally undermined; 

    In which our infrastructure, our industries, our security became dependent on foreign imports.  

    And I was not prepared to see another working-class community lose its pride, the prosperity, the dignity that industry provides. 

    So we intervened, to save British steel and the jobs that went with it.  

    And in line with that principle, as we invest in transport for our regions, that investment will support British supply chains. 

    I promised that this [redacted political content] government would buy, make and sell more here in Britain.  

    And I meant it: 

    Growth, made in Britain.  

    Jobs, here in Britain.  

    And a new generation of crucial national infrastructure, built right here in Britain.

    What I have set out today is just one part of our ambitious plan for the renewal of Britain. 

    A plan which marks a decisive break with the days when government stood back and shrugged its shoulders, as jobs, industry and aspiration were drained away from so many of our towns and cities.   

    Steps towards a new economic model – driven by investment in all parts of the country, not just a few. 

    That is how we intend to deliver on that promise of change; 

    To make you and your family better off.  

    Next week, there will be more to come.  

    This government promised change.  

    And we are keeping that promise.  

    Thank you.

    Updates to this page

    Published 4 June 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI Russia: No restrictions on train traffic between Novye Cheryomushki and Oktyabrskaya are planned for June

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: Moscow Government – Government of Moscow –

    Restrictions on the section between the stations “Novye Cheryomushki” and “Oktyabrskaya” of the Kaluzhsko-Rizhskaya line are no longer planned in June. They were necessary to create a transition to the future metro station “Akademicheskaya” of the Troitskaya line.

    “To minimize inconvenience to passengers, we introduced restrictions on weekends, when fewer people use transport. In addition, we launched free compensation buses, which transported more than 113 thousand people. Employees of the Passenger Mobility Center were on duty at stations and helped build alternative routes,” said the Deputy Mayor of Moscow for Transport and Industry

    Maxim Liksutov.

    The first two sections Troitskaya line opened Sergei Sobyanin last year. The line will connect the ZIL station with Troitsk. By 2030, the length of this line will be more than 43 kilometers. It will become the longest metro line outside the Moscow Ring Road. Now, you can transfer from the Troitskaya Line to Sokolnicheskaya and Bolshaya Koltsevaya, in the future, there will be transfers to Kaluzhsko-Rizhskaya and the Moscow Central Circle.

    Quickly find out the main news of the capital inofficial telegram channel the city of Moscow.

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    Please Note; This Information is Raw Content Directly from the Information Source. It is access to What the Source Is Stating and Does Not Reflect

    https: //vv.mos.ru/nevs/ite/154814073/

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Schools, clinics and sports complexes: what social facilities are being built in the city

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: Moscow Government – Government of Moscow –

    About 230 social infrastructure facilities are being built in the capital using municipal and extra-budgetary funds. Among them are educational, medical, sports and cultural institutions. This was reported by the Deputy Mayor of Moscow for Urban Development Policy and Construction Vladimir Efimov.

    “Currently, 149 educational and 45 sports facilities, more than 20 buildings for medical organizations and 12 for cultural institutions are being built in the capital using all sources of financing. Of the total number of social facilities under construction, 193 are being built by investors. Among them are 128 educational facilities, 42 sports complexes, 15 health and wellness institutions and eight cultural and educational facilities. In particular, in total, more than 78 thousand school and preschool places will be created in the capital at the expense of the city and investors, and clinics and medical centers will be able to accept about four thousand patients per shift,” said Vladimir Efimov.

    Modern buildings appear next to new residential developments and also complement the social infrastructure of historically established areas of the city.

    “Developers are actively involved in creating comfortable and modern social infrastructure: they are building kindergartens, schools, medical centers and sports complexes along with housing. In the future, the educational facilities they build will provide the capital with an additional 68 thousand school and preschool places. For example, in the Yuzhnoye Medvedkovo district, a kindergarten is being built on the territory of a new residential area on Polyarnaya Street. The area of the building will be about 4.4 thousand square meters, it is designed for 220 pupils,” added the Minister of the Moscow Government, Head of the Department of Urban Development Policy of the City of Moscow

    Vladislav Ovchinsky.

    Permits for the construction of all facilities were issued by the capital’s State Construction Supervision Committee. According to the head of the department Anton Slobodchikova, the committee supervises 209 buildings of various social purposes. As part of control and supervision activities, inspectors check the compliance of the erected structures and materials used with the requirements of the design documentation. Specialists of the subordinate Center for Expertise, Research and Testing in Construction carry out instrumental control, including finishing work. This guarantees the quality and safety of schools and kindergartens during their further operation.

    Investors also pay great attention to the development of sports infrastructure. Thus, in the Severnoye Butovo district, a sports and recreation complex with a football field and tennis courts will appear. Its total area will be more than 10 thousand square meters. The facility will appear near the Butovsky forest park at the address: Sadki communal zone, Polyany street, building 12, plot 2.

    Schools, kindergartens and sports centers: what social infrastructure facilities are being built in the capital

    Earlier, Sergei Sobyanin announced plans for a large-scale renovation district sports facilities.

    The construction of social facilities in Moscow corresponds to the goals and initiatives of the national project “Infrastructure for life”.

    Get the latest news quickly official telegram channelthe city of Moscow.

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    Please Note; This Information is Raw Content Directly from the Information Source. It is access to What the Source Is Stating and Does Not Reflect

    https: //vv.mos.ru/nevs/ite/154791073/

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Healthline celebrates its 25-year anniversary of trusted service and impact – and launches a GP booking initiative

    Source: Whakarongorau Aotearoa

    An estimated 3.45 million people have contacted Healthline since it launched 25 years ago
    Whether it is for a 2am check on their baby’s continuous crying, a rash on an arm, or information about where to get more help, the people of Aotearoa know they can rely on the free, 24/7, trusted support from Healthline clinicians. They have relied on that for 25 years – a milestone that is being acknowledged this month.
    There are thousands of people across Aotearoa who have a Healthline magnet on their fridge, who have the 0800 611 116 number in their phone, and who rely on unseen Healthline nurses and paramedics. Healthline plays a critical role in improving access to care.
    Hannah Sleeman, lives in a remote area of the Waikato and has used Healthline several times including when her sore ear symptom was quickly identified by a Healthcare clinician as shingles, and she was advised to see a doctor. She was given the costs and locations of local clinics and was able to get the care she needed quickly.
    The Healthline service has grown from an initial 16 nurses managing 20,000 calls in its first year, to over 150 nurses and paramedics managing 400,000 contacts annually – that’s 1,000 every day.
    What started as a phone service in May 2000 has expanded to include online services, with callers able to share videos and photos to help Healthline clinicians provide the most accurate advice. In addition to calling the trusted 0800 611116 number, people now access Healthline’s healthy.org.nz website for reliable health information, and can request a call back from a clinician, if their query isn’t urgent. The service also now includes the option for people to speak with a Māori clinician.
    Healthline is funded by Health New Zealand and since 2015 has been run by Whakarongorau Aotearoa / New Zealand Telehealth Services.
    Whakarongorau CEO Glynis Sandland said “Healthline is a virtual first responder for health queries, across multiple digital channels. It also plays a critical role in health sector – with 84% of Healthline callers managed through self-care at home or directed to community care, significantly reducing strain on our hospital emergency departments. We know that Healthline is considered by many as a taonga / treasure for the people of New Zealand.”
    Elle Edwards is a mother who was unsure what to do when she accidentally took a double dose of medication late in the night. She called Healthline to ask if she could breastfeed her baby. “They were so helpful and patient and reassuring,” said Elle.
    “Our clinicians are all experienced and specifically tele-triage trained experts and are seriously good at what they do. That’s why 98% of people who contact Healthline follow the advice they are given,” said Sandland.
    “Over the last 25 years Healthline clinicians have seen it all and they have supported people through major events including the Canterbury earthquakes, measles outbreaks, and the COVID pandemic.
    “Healthline has a proud and impactful past, and a very important future. That is definitely something to celebrate.”
    Helen Parry was one of the first nurses on the Healthline team in 2000 and her family were surprised when she said she was going to be providing health triage over the phone. “I was really pleased to be part of such an innovative new way to care and a wonderful service,” said Parry.
    The Healthline 25th anniversary was celebrated at an event at parliament 4 June 2025 hosted by Associate Minister of Health Matt Doocey. At the event Whakarongorau – who run Healthline – announced a new booking initiative
    From next month, when a Healthline nurse or paramedic recomm

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Transporting NZ – Mid-term pass mark for transport but Govt must try harder

    Source: Ia Ara Aotearoa Transporting New Zealand

    Transporting New Zealand says the Coalition Government is making good progress on transport, halfway through their first term and six months since Minister Chris Bishop was appointed to the portfolio.
    However, the road freight body is warning that ongoing ferry delays and roading cost pressures are shaping up as big challenges.
    Head of Policy and Advocacy Billy Clemens says that of the eight practical commitments identified in Transporting New Zealand’s (February 2025) Briefing to the Incoming Minister, the Government has achieved or progressed half, two were ongoing, and two had earned fail grades.
    “Upon Minister Bishop’s appointment we identified eight quick-win commitments, across transport and other portfolios, that would provide practical support and reassurance to our road freight members.”
    “This followed a similar list of priorities in our Briefing to Minister Brown in December 2023.”
    Transporting New Zealand noted excellent progress on random roadside drug testing, tax incentives for business investments, vocational training reform, and road maintenance.
    Progress on Cook Strait Ferry replacements, freight exemptions for congestion charging, and responding to cost pressure on roading projects had been disappointing.
    “You’re starting to see the delay in ferry procurement start to bite, with the Awatere’s retirement leaving KiwiRail with only two vessels for the next four years.”
    “NZTA’s proposed downgrades to the tolled Ōtaki to North of Levin new highway also demonstrate the need for the Government stump up with additional funding to deliver their roading promises.”
    Transporting New Zealand says the Government also has an excellent opportunity to support safety and productivity outcomes through driver licensing and High Productivity Motor Vehicle reforms.
    Transporting New Zealand’s Scorecard (as per quick-wins listed in their February 2025 Briefing to the Incoming Minister)
    Transport
    1. Additional roading investment in Budget 2025 – Partially Achieved
    While there were important boosts for road repair in Hawke’s Bay and the East Coast, the Budget should have provided additional support to the Roads of Regional and National Significance, that NZTA are now under pressure to downgrade, with serious implications for efficiency and safety.
    2. Random roadside drug testing – Achieved
    Legislation enabling random roadside drug testing passed in March, with the support of National, ACT, New Zealand First, and Labour. The roadside drug testing regime is expected to be in place by December, with the government wanting police to undertake 50,000 tests a year.
    3. Freight exemptions to time-of-use charging – Ongoing
    Congestion charging enabling legislation is currently being considered by the Transport and Infrastructure Select Committee. Transporting New Zealand’s suggested amendments would prevent congestion charges acting as a de facto goods tax.
    4. Tax incentives for efficient heavy vehicles – Achieved
    The Government’s Investment Boost tax incentive will help get more productive, efficient heavy vehicles on the road, and support investment across the entire economy.
    5. Incentivising fleet renewal through emissions regulations – Ongoing
    Work on vehicle standards and reducing regulatory barriers to importing efficient heavy vehicles is currently being worked through.
    Transport, State-Owned Enterprises and Rail
    6. Prioritise the prompt delivery of replacement Cook Strait ferries – Not Achieved
    It has been 539 days since Cabinet advised KiwiRail that the Government was pulling the plug on the iReX Project following repeated cost blowouts. Despite contrary advice from a Ministerial Advisory Group, the Government is proceeding with rail-enabled vessels, that have still not been procured.
    Immigration and Workforce Development
    7. Support vocational training and allowing migrant drivers to fill critical workforce shortages – Partially Achieved
    The Government’s tertiary education reforms will ensure automotive vocational education is relevant to both trainees and employers alike. However, the termination of the temporary residence pathway for migrant truck drivers has left businesses in hard-to-staff regions facing recruitment challenges.
    ACC
    8. Save ACC’s Fleet Saver levy reduction programme – Not Achieved
    ACC is proceeding to close the safe fleet management incentive to new members from this year, and close it completely in 2029. The Minister for ACC still has the opportunity to defer this decision until an effective alternative can be developed, that will maintain safety benefits for all road users. 
    About Ia Ara Aotearoa Transporting New Zealand
    Ia Ara Aotearoa Transporting New Zealand is the peak national membership association representing the road freight transport industry. Our members operate urban, rural and inter- regional commercial freight transport services throughout the country.
    Road is the dominant freight mode in New Zealand, transporting 92.8% of the freight task on a tonnage basis, and 75.1% on a tonne-km basis. The road freight transport industry employs over 34,000 people across more than 4700 businesses, with an annual turnover of $6 billion.

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: NZNO backs people’s pay equity select committee

    Source: New Zealand Nurses Organisation

    Representing a third of the pay equity claims scrapped by the Coalition Government, NZNO is throwing its full support behind the People’s Select Committee on Pay Equity.
    Members of the New Zealand Nurses Organisation Tōpūtanga Tapuhi Kaitiaki o Aotearoa (NZNO) had 12 pay equity claims being progressed across the health sector including aged care, primary health care, hospices, Plunket, community health and laboratories when the scheme was gutted on 6 May.
    These claims covered almost 10,000 nurses, health care assistants, allied health workers and administration staff. A further 35,000 NZNO Te Whatu Ora members had their pay equity review halted by the changes, meaning their pay would again fall behind.
    NZNO Primary Health Care Nurses College chair Tracey Morgan says it was devastating to the 5000 primary health care members that their claim was scuppered without warning or legitimate reason.
    “It was antidemocratic and an attack on women for the Government not to have consulted the workers whose lives they were changing. Primary and community health care nurses, like their hospice, Plunket and aged care counterparts, accepted lower wage increases in their collective agreements on the understanding they were likely to receive pay equity settlements.
    “Now they can have their say through the People’s Select Committee on Pay Equity.
    “The committee of 10 former women MPs from across the political spectrum are strong wahine who helped establishment the previous system to address the gender discrimination which has kept down their wages their whole working lives.”
    Most New Zealanders – 68 percent – believe the Government should have consulted on the changes, a new poll released today found.
    Tracey Morgan says NZNO urges all its members to submit their views to the Select Committee so they can be heard when it meets in August.

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: LCQ19: Protection of Wages on Insolvency Fund

    Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

    Following is a question by Reverend Canon the Hon Peter Douglas Koon and a written reply by the Secretary for Labour and Welfare, Mr Chris Sun, in the Legislative Council today (June 4):

    Question:

    Regarding the Protection of Wages on Insolvency Fund (PWIF), will the Government inform this Council:

    (1) of the number of approved applications under the PWIF and their percentage in the total number of bankruptcy cases over the past five years;

    (2) of the total amount of ex gratia payment released under the PWIF, the accumulated surplus of PWIF and the average amount approved per application in each of the past five years;

    (3) given that the PWIF implemented enhancement measures in June 2022, which included engagement of private law firms to assist applicants in filing winding-up/bankruptcy petitions against the employers, and setting up of an in-house legal team to make recommendations direct to the Labour Department (LD) in respect of applications under section 18 of the Protection of Wages on Insolvency Ordinance (Cap. 380), of the respective number of (a) cases referred to law firms for follow-up actions (broken down into (i) cases with assistance rendered to applicants in filing winding-up/bankruptcy petitions against employers and (ii) cases not requiring the filing of winding-up/bankruptcy petitions against employers), and (b) cases received by the in-house legal team (broken down into (i) cases with recommendations made to the LD in accordance with Cap. 380 and (ii) cases not requiring the making of recommendations), since the implementation of the said enhancement measures;

    (4) given that the Government has established an interdepartmental task force to strengthen co-operation in combating illegal activities relating to PWIF abuse, in respect of fraud and other illegal acts involving the PWIF in the past five years, of (i) the number of employers, company directors, responsible individuals and employees prosecuted by the government departments concerned, and (ii) the number of successful applications made by the government departments concerned to the court for disqualifying responsible individuals of companies from being directors and taking part in the formation or management of a company;

    (5) whether it will consider increasing the penalties for PWIF abuse by legislative amendments so as enhance deterrence; if so, of the details; if not, the reasons for that;

    (6) given that the Government indicated in the paper submitted to the Panel on Manpower of this Council on March 25 last year that it would review the coverage of ex gratia payment in respect of severance payment under PWIF to explore the room for further increasing the payment ceiling in order to enhance its fully covered rate, of the progress made in this regard, and whether the Government will consider extending the coverage of the PWIF to include mandatory contributions to the Mandatory Provident Fund defaulted by employers; whether it will consider establishing a mechanism to review the PWIF regularly; if so, of the details; if not, the reasons for that; and

    (7) given that starting from April 1 last year, the Government waives the business registration levy of $150 payable to the PWIF for two years, whether the Government will consider, on the premise of not affecting the PWIF’s operation, further reducing and/or waiving such levy in the light of the slowdown in economic growth; if so, of the details; if not, the reasons for that?

    Reply:

    President,

    Established under the Protection of Wages on Insolvency Ordinance (PWIO), the Protection of Wages on Insolvency Fund (PWIF) aims to provide timely financial relief in the form of ex gratia payment to employees in the event of business closure of their insolvent employers. The affected employees may apply for ex gratia payment from the PWIF in respect of arrears in wages, pay for untaken annual leave, pay for untaken statutory holidays, wages in lieu of notice and/or severance payments (SP) owed by their employers.

    In response to the Member’s question, the reply is provided below:

    (1) From 2020 to 2024, the number of approved applications under the PWIF in each year is at Annex 1. The Labour Department (LD) does not keep the total number of winding-up/bankruptcy cases.

    (2) From 2020 to 2024, the total amount of ex gratia payment released under the PWIF, the average amount of ex gratia payment released per application approved and the accumulated surplus in each year are at Annex 2.

    (3) Since November 2022, the PWIF has launched enhancement measures including appointing law firms to provide free legal service to applicants to assist them in filing winding-up or bankruptcy petitions against their employers for cases under section 16 of the PWIO, so as to save them from applying for legal aid at the Legal Aid Department (LAD) and undergoing the means test to expedite the processing of applications. In addition, the PWIF has set up an internal legal team to provide the LD with recommendations on applications involving section 18 of the PWIO in place of recommendations from the LAD.

    As at April 2025, the PWIF had referred 569 cases to the appointed law firms for follow-up, while the in-house legal team had received 1 116 cases. The breakdown of the number of cases referred to the law firms for follow-up by cases with assistance rendered to applicants in filing winding-up/bankruptcy petitions against their employers and cases not requiring the filing of winding-up/bankruptcy petitions against employers, and the breakdown of the number of cases received by the in-house legal team by cases with recommendations made to the LD under section 18 of the PWIO and cases not requiring the making of recommendations are at Annex 3.

    (4) and (5) The Government takes a serious view on suspected abuse of PWIF by employers, and has set up an inter-departmental Task Force comprising representatives from the LD, the Commercial Crime Bureau of the Hong Kong Police Force (the Police) and the Official Receiver’s Office (ORO) to strengthen proactive investigation of suspicious cases.

    The LD rigorously verifies and closely monitors every application to the PWIF, and pays attention to whether the company responsible persons are involved in any other unlawful acts while operating the business and managing the finance of the company. If it is found that the company responsible persons are suspected of illegal transfer of assets, theft of company money, evasion of liabilities by deception, failure to keep proper accounting records, etc, the LD will refer such cases to the Police and/or the ORO for follow-up. When there is sufficient evidence, the law enforcement agencies will take out prosecution in accordance with the legislation such as the Theft Ordinance and the Crimes Ordinance. Upon conviction, the maximum penalty is imprisonment for 14 years (for example, in the case of fraud). Besides, as stipulated under the PWIO, any person who, in providing information in respect of a PWIF application, makes any statement which he knows to be false, or recklessly makes a false statement, or produces any false documents or records with the intent to deceive, may be prosecuted. Upon conviction, the maximum penalty is a fine of $50,000 and imprisonment for three months.

    From 2020 to 2024, the LD referred five cases involving suspected abuse of the PWIF to the Police. No substantiated case of abusing the PWIF was detected during the period. Upon referrals from the LD, the ORO during the same period disqualified through the court a total of 15 company directors and/or responsible persons from assuming a director of a company and from taking part in the promotion, formation or management of a company.

    (6) The Protection of Wages on Insolvency Fund Board (PWIF Board) and the LD review the coverage of the PWIF from time to time taking into account the socio-economic development and needs, with a view to improving the protection for employees affected by business closure of their insolvent employers in a reasonably practicable manner.

    Upon the passage of a resolution of the Legislative Council under the PWIO on March 20, 2025, the maximum amount of ex gratia payment on SP under the PWIF was increased from $100,000 plus 50 per cent of excess entitlement to $200,000 plus 50 per cent of excess entitlement to further improve the protection for employees. The new maximum amount came into effect on March 21, 2025, upon gazettal of the resolution.

    The PWIF releases payment in the form of ex gratia payment to employees who are owed wages and major sums payable upon termination of employment contracts in accordance with the Employment Ordinance. On the other hand, the Mandatory Provident Fund Schemes Ordinance aims to assist employees in accumulating the Mandatory Provident Fund (MPF) to enhance retirement protection. As the policy objectives of the PWIF and the MPF are different, the Government has no plan to expand the scope of the PWIF to cover the defaulted MPF mandatory contributions of employers.

    (7) The PWIF is mainly financed by a levy per annum on business registration. From June 17, 2022, the levy is reduced from $250 to $150 a year. In the 2024-25 Budget, the Financial Secretary announced to increase the business registration fee by $200 to $2,200 with effect from April 1, 2024. To relieve the relevant impact on enterprises, the Government waived the levy of $150 payable to the PWIF with effect from the same date for two years until March 31, 2026. The PWIF will resume the collection of the levy from April 1, 2026.

    Considering the implementation of the abolition of MPF offsetting arrangement will result in additional expenditure for the ex gratia payment on SP, the PWIF Board will continue to closely monitor the financial position of the PWIF to ensure that the PWIF maintains a stable income and a reasonable accumulated surplus to meet the additional expenditure arising from economic downturns and to sustain its continuous operation. The Government has no plan to adjust the levy at this stage.

    Ends/Wednesday, June 4, 2025
    Issued at HKT 12:06

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News