Category: Politics

  • MIL-OSI Security: San Francisco Man and New York Man Charged in Scheme to Defraud Investors

    Source: US FBI

    OAKLAND – A federal grand jury indicted Avi Fogel, now known as Avi King, and Christos Chrestatos each with one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud and four counts of wire fraud.  Fogel was also charged with one count of false writings to a government agency and an additional count of wire fraud.

    Fogel, 47, of San Francisco (who was also known as, in addition to Avi King, Aaron Rose, Aaron Rothchild, and Aaron Gilman), self-surrendered on Nov. 7, 2024, and made his initial appearance in federal court in Oakland that same day.  Chrestatos, 45, of Long Island, N.Y., also known as Chris Silverman, was arrested today, and made his initial appearance in federal court in the Eastern District of New York.

    According to the indictment filed Oct. 3, 2024, and unsealed Nov. 7, 2024, defendants allegedly engaged in an investment fraud scheme wherein they purported to be producers in the entertainment industry with close ties to “A-list” actors, directors, and other celebrities.  Fogel allegedly met potential victims in a variety of places, such as dating websites and shared taxi rides.  At various times, defendants claimed to be producers at “Universal.”  The indictment alleges that the men lied to victims about their ability to arrange investment and product integration deals in feature films, documentaries, and television series when they knew they had no actual connection to the productions and no affiliation with Universal.

    Defendants allegedly created entities, including Suzy and the Sock Dragon Media Group, LLC, Rhinoheart Films, LLC, and The Book Media Group, LLC, to entice investors to invest in their fraudulent scheme.  According to the indictment, Fogel and Chrestatos fraudulently obtained investments from multiple victims totaling approximately $167,100, and used the funds for purposes other than as represented to investors.

    Additionally, the indictment alleges that Fogel submitted a fraudulent loan application to the U.S. Small Business Administration through the Economic Injury Disaster Loan Program, ultimately receiving $52,400. Fogel allegedly claimed that his company, Suzy and the Sock Dragon Media Group, LLC, was engaged in “entertainment services,” had $125,000 in gross revenues and sold $20,000 in goods, amounts that were derived from the money obtained through defendants’ investment fraud scheme.

    The announcement was made by United States Attorney Ismail J. Ramsey and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Special Agent in Charge Robert K. Tripp.

    Both defendants were released on bond. Fogel’s next scheduled appearance is on Dec. 9, 2024, for a status hearing before the Honorable Araceli Martínez-Olguín, U.S. District Judge.

    An indictment merely alleges that crimes have been committed, and all defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.  If convicted, defendants each face a maximum sentence of 20 years of imprisonment, a fine of $250,000, three years of supervised release, and forfeiture for the charges of conspiracy to commit wire fraud and wire fraud in counts one to five.  Additionally, if convicted, Fogel faces a maximum sentence of 30 years of imprisonment, a fine of $250,000, three years of supervised release, and forfeiture for the wire fraud charge in count six, and five years of imprisonment, a fine of $250,000, three years of supervised release, and forfeiture for the false writings to a government agency charge in count seven.  However, any sentence following conviction would be imposed by the court after consideration of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and the federal statute governing the imposition of a sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3553.

    Assistant U.S. Attorney Benjamin K. Kleinman is prosecuting the case with the assistance of Kay Konopaske. The prosecution is the result of an investigation by the FBI.

    Avi Fogel Indictment
     

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Security: Florida Man Pleads Guilty to Multimillion-Dollar Investment Fraud Schemes and Conspiracy to Launder Money

    Source: US FBI

    Defendant Also Admitted to Disaster Relief Loan Fraud and Destroying Evidence to Obstruct Government Investigation

    SAN FRANCISCO – Thomas Aaron Signorelli pleaded guilty today in federal court to one count of bank fraud, two counts of wire fraud, one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud, one count of theft of government property, one count of destruction of records, and one count of conspiracy to launder money.

    Signorelli, 46, of West Palm Beach, Fla., was charged by information on Sept. 19, 2024.  In pleading guilty to all seven counts in the information, Signorelli admitted that beginning in January 2021 to around December 2023, he falsely claimed he could assist individuals and entities in need of capital by raising funds, obtaining loans, and securing profitable investments through his company WS Capital, which was registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission.  In fact, Signorelli did not raise capital, obtain loans, or secure profitable investments, and instead used the victims’ funds to pay his personal and living expenses, as well as to pay back other victims.

    Signorelli engaged in one of the fraud schemes with his co-conspirator David Scott Cacchione.  As part of that scheme, Signorelli and Cacchione convinced investors that their money would be used to purchase accounts receivables that did not exist.  Rather than use the funds as promised, Signorelli typically shared a portion of the funds with Cacchione and used the remainder to pay personal and living expenses and repay other victims.  Through his various schemes, Signorelli defrauded individuals and entities of more than $2,500,000.  Signorelli further admitted that he conspired with an attorney in Florida to launder fraud proceeds through the attorney’s client trust account in order to disguise the source and nature of the fraud proceeds.

    The plea agreement also describes that, in December 2021, Signorelli was introduced to an individual who claimed to be looking for someone to launder large sums of drug trafficking proceeds.  Signorelli offered to use WS Capital accounts to launder the supposed drug trafficking proceeds and accepted approximately $150,000 in government funds from an undercover government agent.  Instead of laundering those funds, Signorelli stole the money and used it to pay his personal expenses.

    Signorelli further admitted that he caused applications for a Paycheck Protection Program loan and an Economic Injury Disaster Loan to be submitted to the Small Business Administration (SBA) on behalf of a Napa real estate venture that he had formed.  Signorelli made false representations about the venture’s revenues, payroll, and employee count in order to obtain over $50,000 in disaster relief loans.

    Finally, in August 2022, Signorelli learned that the FBI had obtained a warrant to search his mobile phone.  As detailed in his plea agreement, prior to turning in his mobile phone, Signorelli deleted electronic communications on his device in order to obstruct the government’s investigation.

    The announcement was made by United States Attorney Ismail J. Ramsey, FBI Special Agent in Charge Robert Tripp, IRS-CI Oakland Field Office Acting Special Agent in Charge Michael Mosley, and Small Business Administration (SBA) Office of Inspector General (OIG) Special Agent in Charge of the Western Region Weston King.

    Signorelli remains free on a $200,000 appearance bond imposed on Sept. 20, 2024.  His sentencing hearing is scheduled for Mar. 24, 2025 before the Honorable James Donato, U.S. District Court Judge.  The maximum statutory penalty for each count is set forth below.

    OFFENSE

    STATUTE

    MAXIMUM PENALTY

    Bank Fraud 18 U.S.C. § 1344 30 years’ imprisonment; $1,000,000 fine; 5 years’ supervised release; $100 special assessment; forfeiture and restitution
    Wire Fraud 18 U.S.C. § 1343 20 years’ imprisonment; $250,000 or twice the gross gain or loss, whichever is greater; 3 years’ supervised release; $100 special assessment; forfeiture and restitution
    Conspiracy to Commit Wire Fraud 18 U.S.C. § 1349 20 years’ imprisonment; $250,000 or twice the gross gain or loss, whichever is greater; 3 years’ supervised release; $100 special assessment; forfeiture and restitution
    Theft of Government Property 18 U.S.C. § 641 10 years’ imprisonment; $250,000; 3 years’ supervised release; $100 special assessment; forfeiture and restitution
    Destruction, Alteration, and Falsification of Records in  Federal Investigations 18 U.S.C. § 1519 20 years’ imprisonment; $250,000; 3 years’ supervised release; $100 special assessment; forfeiture and restitution
    Conspiracy to Launder Money 18 U.S.C. § 1956(h) 20 years’ imprisonment; $500,000 or twice the value of the property involved in the transaction, whichever is greater; 3 years’ supervised release; $100 special assessment; forfeiture and restitution

    However, any sentence will be imposed by the court only after consideration of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and the federal statute governing the imposition of a sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3553.

    Signorelli’s co-conspirator Cacchione pleaded guilty on Aug. 14, 2024, and was sentenced by Judge Donato on Nov. 4, 2024, to a 40-month term of imprisonment.

    Assistant U.S. Attorney Garth Hire is prosecuting the case.  The prosecution is the result of an investigation by the FBI, IRS-CI, and SBA OIG.
     

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Security: Las Vegas Man Arrested for Assaulting Law Enforcement and Other Charges During January 6 Capitol Breach

    Source: US FBI

               WASHINGTON — A Las Vegas man has been arrested on felony and misdemeanor charges, including for assaulting law enforcement during the breach of the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. His actions and the actions of others disrupted a joint session of the U.S. Congress convened to ascertain and count the electoral votes related to the 2020 presidential election.

               Mario Gonzalez, 51, of Las Vegas, Nevada, is charged in a criminal complaint filed in the District of Columbia with felony offenses of obstruction of law enforcement during civil disorder and assaulting, resisting, or impeding certain officers. In addition to the felonies, Gonzalez is charged with misdemeanor offenses of knowingly entering or remaining in any restricted building or grounds, disorderly and disruptive conduct in a restricted building or grounds, and disorderly conduct on Capitol grounds.

               Gonzalez was arrested on Jan. 8, 2024, by the FBI in Las Vegas and made his initial appearance in the District of Nevada.

               According to allegations contained in court documents, Gonzalez traveled from Las Vegas to Washington, D.C., and was present among a mob of rioters illegally assembled on Capitol grounds near the Peace Monument circle on Jan. 6, 2021. Gonzalez then approached the Lower West Terrace and entered the northern scaffolding around the Inauguration stage, where police attempted to prevent rioters from gaining access to the steps leading up to the Upper West Terrace. As the rioters succeeded in pushing the police line back and up the stairs, Gonzalez filmed the altercation with police and took selfie-style recordings of himself using his cell phone.

               Court documents say that Gonzalez then came out of the scaffolding carrying a fire extinguisher and proceeded to spray the extinguisher in the direction of the police line that held the crowd at bay. Police then deployed a chemical riot control agent in the direction of Gonzalez, which caused him to drop the fire extinguisher and retreat into the crowd.

               This case is being prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia and the Department of Justice National Security Division’s Counterterrorism Section. Valuable assistance was provided by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Nevada.

               This case is being investigated by the FBI’s Las Vegas and Washington Field Offices. Valuable assistance was provided by the U.S. Capitol Police and the Metropolitan Police Department of the District of Columbia.

               In the 36 months since Jan. 6, 2021, more than 1,265 individuals have been charged in nearly all 50 states for crimes related to the breach of the U.S. Capitol, including more than 440 individuals charged with assaulting or impeding law enforcement, a felony. The investigation remains ongoing.

               Anyone with tips can call 1-800-CALL-FBI (800-225-5324) or visit tips.fbi.gov.

    A complaint is merely an allegation, and all defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law. 

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Security: Hudson County Convicted Felon Indicted for Possessing a Firearm and an Extended Magazine

    Source: US FBI

    NEWARK, N.J. – A Hudson County man has been indicted for a firearms offense, Acting U.S. Attorney Vikas Khanna announced.

    Richard Sharp, 25, of Bayonne, New Jersey and known on social media as “Famous Richard,” is charged with one count of possession of a firearm and ammunition by a convicted felon. He was arrested earlier today and appeared before U.S. Magistrate Judge André M. Espinosa in Newark federal court and was detained.

    According to documents filed in this case and statements made in court:

    On July 4, 2024, law enforcement responded to reports of an incident at a gas station in Bayonne, New Jersey. The investigation revealed that during an altercation at the gas station, Sharp had brandished a firearm with an extended magazine and threatened to shoot other people who were at the gas station. Several days later, Sharp posted a video on social media showing him dancing while holding a firearm equipped with an extended magazine.

    Subsequently, on July 12, 2024, following a judicially authorized search of Sharp’s residence and vehicle, law enforcement recovering a loaded Beretta M9 semi-automatic handgun with a defaced serial number and an extended magazine that contained approximately 24 rounds of ammunition.

    The count of being a felon in possession of a firearm and ammunition is punishable by a maximum of 15 years in prison and a fine of $250,000, or twice the gross gain or loss from the offense, whichever is greatest.

    Acting U.S. Attorney Khanna credited special agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Newark Field Division under the direction of Special Agent in Charge Brian J. Driscoll, with the investigation. He also thanked the Hudson County Prosecutor’s Office, under the direction of Prosecutor Esther Suarez and the Bayonne Police Department under the direction of Police Chief Robert Geisler.

    The government is represented by Assistant U.S. Attorney Sean Nadel of the Narcotics/OCDETF Unit in Newark.

    The charges and allegations contained in the indictment are merely accusations, and the defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.

                                                                 ###

    Defense counsel: Areeb Salim, Esq. 

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Security: Mercer County Man Charged with Illegally Possessing Firearms, Fentanyl, and Cocaine

    Source: US FBI

    TRENTON, N.J. – A Mercer County, New Jersey, man was arrested and charged with illegally possessing firearms and possessing with the intent to distribute fentanyl and cocaine, U.S. Attorney Philip R. Sellinger announced today.

    Jose Colon-Matos, 33, of Trenton, is charged by complaint with one count of being a previously convicted felon in possession of two firearms, one count of possession with the intent to distribute fentanyl, one count of possession with the intent to distribute cocaine, and one count of possession of firearms in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime. He made his initial appearance on January 6, 2025, before U.S. Magistrate Judge Tonianne J. Bongiovanni in Trenton federal court and was detained pending a detention hearing scheduled for January 10, 2025.

    According to documents filed in this case and statements made in court:

    On May 15, 2024, following an investigation into narcotics activity in Hamilton Township in Mercer County, law enforcement officers conducted a court-ordered search of an apartment used by Colon-Matos during which they recovered from a safe in the apartment two loaded firearms, including one with an obliterated serial number, distribution quantities of suspected fentanyl and cocaine, and approximately $9,000.00 in United States currency. The narcotics were subsequently tested by the New Jersey State Police forensic laboratory, which returned positive results for fentanyl and cocaine.

    The charge of being a convicted felon in possession of a firearm carries a potential maximum penalty of 15 years in prison and a fine of up to $250,000. The counts of possession with intent to distribute fentanyl and cocaine each carry a maximum penalty of 20 years in prison and a fine of up to $1 million. The charge of possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime carries a mandatory minimum sentence of five years in prison, which must run consecutively to any other sentence imposed, and a maximum potential penalty of life imprisonment, and a fine of $250,000.

    U.S. Attorney Sellinger credited special agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, under the direction of Acting Special Agent in Charge Brian Driscoll in Newark, with the investigation leading to the charges. He also thanked the Hamilton Township Police Division, under the direction of Chief Kenneth R. DeBoskey, and the Mercer County Prosecutor’s Office, for their assistance in the investigation.

    The government is represented by Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Jonathan S. Garelick of the U.S. Attorney’s Office’s Criminal Division in Trenton.

    The charges and allegations contained in the complaint are merely accusations, and the defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.

    Defense counsel: Andrea G. Aldana, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Office of the Federal Public Defender.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Security: Bergen County Man Sentenced to 72 Months in Prison for Possession with Intent to Distribute Heroin

    Source: US FBI

    NEWARK, N.J. – A Bergen County, New Jersey, man was sentenced to 72 months in prison for possession of heroin with intent to distribute, Acting U.S. Attorney Vikas Khanna announced.

    Dawan A. Brown, 37, of Cliffside Park, New Jersey, previously pleaded guilty before Judge Brian R. Martinotti to an information charging him with one count of possession with intent to distribute 100 grams or more of a mixture and substance containing a detectable amount of heroin.  Judge Martinotti imposed the sentence in Newark federal court.

    According to documents filed in this case and statements made in court:

    Since at least January 2022, law enforcement had investigated drug trafficking activity in the District of New Jersey, to include in and around Harrison, New Jersey.  During the investigation, law enforcement officers learned that Dawan Brown, a/k/a “DB,” distributes narcotics in New Jersey.  

    Through investigation, law enforcement officers learned that Brown packaged and distributed large amounts of heroin from an apartment in a building located in Harrison, New Jersey.  On June 14, 2022, law enforcement officers executed search warrants at the Harrison apartment and at Brown’s residence located in Cliffside Park, New Jersey.  From the apartment in Harrison, officers recovered approximately two kilograms of narcotics, suspected to contain amounts of heroin and fentanyl; drug paraphernalia, including a ledger, a safe, scales, a coffee and spice grinder, ink pads, stamps, Ziplock bags, vacuum bags and a vacuum bag sealer machine, razor blades, glassine envelopes and strainers; and approximately $34,000 that was contained within the safe along with some of the suspected heroin and fentanyl.  From the residence in Cliffside Park, officers recovered approximately $169,000, five cell phones, safety deposit keys, and various jewelry including diamond necklaces, gold watches, and a gold ring.  Law enforcement officers also recovered approximately $225,000 from safety deposit boxes that were associated with Brown.

    As part of his plea agreement, Brown agreed to forfeit $436,615.95, the proceeds from the narcotics trafficking.

    In addition to the prison term, Judge Martinotti sentenced Brown to four years of supervised release.

    Acting U.S. Attorney Khanna credited special agents of the FBI, under the direction of Special Agent in Charge Brian J Driscoll Newark; the Essex County Prosecutor’s Office, under the direction of Prosecutor Theodore N. Stephens II; Harrison Police Department, under the direction of Chief David Strumolo; and Cliffside Park Police Department, under the direction of Chief Marc Marano, with the investigation leading to the sentencing.  He also thanked the Essex County Sheriff’s Office, the Bloomfield Police Department, the Newark Police Department, Irvington Police Department, Hillsborough Police Department, and the Fort Lee Police Department.

    The government is represented by Assistant U.S. Attorney Robert L. Frazer of the Organized Crime/Gangs Unit and Assistant U.S. Attorney Dong Joo Lee of the Cybercrime Unit, in Newark.
     

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI USA: Vice Ranking Member Amo Introduces R.U.B.I.O. Act After Secretary Rubio Obscures Dire State of Food Aid for Starving Kids

    Source: US Congressman Gabe Amo (Rhode Island 1st District)

    The Reaffirming Unified Boundaries for Integrity and Oversight (R.U.B.I.O.) Act would ensure the Secretary of State is only doing one job.

    WASHINGTON, DC – House Foreign Affairs Vice Ranking Member Gabe Amo (D-RI), introduced the Reaffirming Unified Boundaries for Integrity and Oversight or R.U.B.I.O. Act to prohibit the Secretary of State from taking on additional roles in the Federal government while serving as Secretary.

    To ensure that Secretaries of State have adequate time and attention to manage our nation’s foreign policy, this legislation requires that the Secretary of State do only the job the Senate confirmed them to do – serve as Secretary of State.

    “Foreign aid should be a foreign policy priority, and Secretary of State Marco Rubio is dropping the ball. In my questioning yesterday in the House Foreign Affairs Committee, our Secretary didn’t know the true state of the delayed contracts for Ready-to-Use Therapeutic Food aid manufactured by Rhode Island nonprofit, Edesia Nutrition, meant to save the lives of starving children around the world” said Vice Ranking Member Amo (D-RI). “To ensure Secretary Rubio can focus on preventing children from starving while supporting American jobs, I’m introducing the R.U.B.I.O. Act toprevent the Secretary of State from holding more than one job. This bill just makes sure our food aid programs don’t fall through the cracks and the Secretary has the time and energy to do his job well.”

    Watch Vice Ranking Member Amo’s Questioning of Secretary Rubio Here.

    BACKGROUND

    On May 21, 2025, Amo questioned Secretary Rubio about the ready-to-use therapeutic food aid program that has been impacted by the Department’s work stoppage orders and disorganization. In the hearing, Rubio confirmed Ready-to-Use Therapeutic Foods (RUTF) produced by Rhode Island’s Edesia Nutrition is lifesaving aid and Amo pressed the Secretary to do everything to keep starving children from dying.

    Amo has been trying to hold Rubio accountable to solve State Department administrative problems that threaten Rhode Island jobs and prevent life saving aid from reaching starving children for months.

    On January 31, 2025, Amo asked Secretary Rubiofor information on the Trump administration’s unilateral foreign aid pause impact on the production and delivery of Rhode Island-made RUTFs. Amo called outSecretary Rubio for missing a deadline to provide clarity on foreign aid distribution on February 7.
     

    ###

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Polytechnic University to Train Top AI and IT Specialists

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: Peter the Great St Petersburg Polytechnic University – Peter the Great St Petersburg Polytechnic University –

    The Ministry of Digital Development, Communications and Mass Media of Russia and the Analytical Center under the Government of the Russian Federation have summed up the results of the competitive selection of universities to receive grants to launch higher education programs aimed at training highly qualified specialists in the field of artificial intelligence and information technology. Polytechnic University became the winner of both competitions. The project will be implemented at the Institute of Computer Science and Cybersecurity.

    Two structures will be created in the IKNK.

    Cross-industry educational center for artificial intelligence. Educational center for software and hardware systems for information systems, data storage systems and telecommunications.

    Winning the competition was a natural step in the development of IT education at our university. Now the task is to create an educational environment aimed at developing skills in analyzing large amounts of data, mastering machine learning methods, deeply understanding the capabilities and limitations of artificial intelligence, as well as the ability to assess the ethical implications of using the latest digital solutions. The joint work of the university and our partners in creating specialized centers helps to prepare high-level professionals who are able to successfully cope with modern challenges of the labor market and strengthen Russia’s competitiveness in the global digital environment, said Lyudmila Pankova, Vice-Rector for Educational Activities at SPbPU.

    The project will be implemented jointly with industrial partners from among leading IT companies, including Rostelecom and YADRO.

    Admission to bachelor’s degree programs in AI and IT will start this academic year. Top specialists will be trained within the framework of the national project “Data Economy and Digital Transformation of the State”.

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI United Nations: 22 May 2025 Departmental update Dengue Expert Review Panel for Diagnostics

    Source: World Health Organisation

    In response to the 2024–2025 global dengue emergency, the World Health Organization (WHO) activated its Expert Review Panel for Diagnostics (ERPD) to guide the selection and use of appropriate diagnostic tools for dengue. This initiative was coordinated by the Public Health Laboratory Strengthening unit of the WHO Health Emergencies Programme and the Global Neglected Tropical Diseases Programme in collaboration with WHO’s Prequalification Programme.

    The ERPD provides an expert-driven mechanism to evaluate the potential risks and benefits of in vitro diagnostic (IVD) medical devices that are not currently covered by WHO’s prequalification process or other stringent regulatory assessment. Comprising an independent advisory group of technical experts, the ERPD assesses whether candidate diagnostics meet defined quality and performance criteria and classifies their risk to support evidence-based procurement decisions. Recognizing critical gaps in the availability of IVDs – particularly for epidemic-prone neglected tropical diseases – WHO supports the procurement of diagnostic products and laboratory items essential for managing a wide range of communicable and noncommunicable diseases.

    Following a thorough review process, seven diagnostic products for dengue have been listed. These recommendations are valid for one year and are intended to facilitate timely and informed procurement decisions in the global health response to the dengue emergency.

    MIL OSI United Nations News

  • MIL-OSI Security: Wilver Villegas-Palomino Added to FBI’s Ten Most Wanted Fugitives List

    Source: US FBI

    The ELN uses proceeds from Villegas-Palomino’s drug trafficking enterprise to fund terrorist attacks, launch sabotage operations, buy political influence, and engage in other malign activities designed to destabilize government institutions and subvert U.S. national security and law enforcement interests in the region. 

    A federal arrest warrant was issued for Villegas-Palomino in the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas, Houston Division, on February 13, 2020, after he was charged with narcoterrorism, international cocaine distribution conspiracy, and international cocaine distribution. 

    “Villegas-Palomino continues to present a grave threat to the community through his cocaine and narcoterrorist empire,” said FBI Supervisory Special Agent Nick Zarro, who is overseeing the investigation out of the FBI Houston Field Office. “Cocaine produced in Villegas-Palomino’s laboratories ultimately ends up on U.S. streets, plaguing local communities and driving spikes in violent crime.” 

    The Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Force, a federal drug enforcement program overseen by the U.S. Attorney General and the Department of Justice, has named Villegas-Palomino a consolidated priority organization target (CPOT), which is reserved for those involved in the most significant international drug trafficking operations affecting the United States. 

    Zarro hopes the poster and publicity will move hesitant associates to come forward with tips. “Continued publicity of Villegas-Palomino’s status on this list will disrupt his ability to travel abroad, restrict his ability to meet with international drug trafficking associates, and hamper his ability to recruit new members—and will generate leads and intelligence for law enforcement,” he said.

    Villegas-Palomino is 41 years old and has black hair and brown eyes. He is between 5’7” and 5’9” tall and weighs about 190 pounds. He is a Colombian national and speaks Spanish. Aliases include Carlos El Puerco (“Carlos the Hog”), El Puerco, Wilver Villegas, and Wilver Palomino. 

    If you have any information concerning Villegas-Palomino, please contact the FBI via WhatsApp (neither a government-operated nor government-controlled platform) at (281) 630-0330. You can also contact your local FBI office or the nearest American Embassy or Consulate, or you can submit a tip online at tips.fbi.gov.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Security: U.S. Attorney’s Office Hosts Meeting of the Western District Health Care Fraud Working Group

    Source: US FBI

    Multi-Agency Partnership Continues Efforts to Combat Health Care Fraud and Protect Taxpayer Dollars

    CHARLOTTE, N.C. – U.S. Attorney Dena J. King announced today the annual meeting of the Western District’s Health Care Fraud Working Group, a partnership of federal and state agencies focused on combating health care fraud and protecting taxpayer dollars in the Western District of North Carolina.

    The working group comprises investigators, analysts, auditors, and attorneys from state and federal agencies, including the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General (HHS-OIG), the Food and Drug Administration’s Office of Criminal Investigations (FDA-OCI), the Internal Revenue Service Criminal Investigation (IRS-CI), the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Inspector General (VA-OIG), the Department of Defense Office of Inspector General Defense Criminal Investigative Service (DCIS), the North Carolina Attorney General’s Medicaid Investigations Division, the North Carolina Department of Insurance, the South Carolina Medicaid Investigations Division, and the Office of Personnel Management.

    At today’s meeting, U.S. Attorney King reaffirmed the importance of collaboration among the partner agencies and recognized their contributions.

    “Health care fraud undermines public trust, exploits vulnerable patients, and siphons billions from taxpayer-funded programs,” said U.S. Attorney King. “By combining our expertise and resources we can detect, dismantle, and prosecute health care fraud schemes and protect vital government programs that so many North Carolinians rely upon for their health care needs. I am grateful to our partner agencies for their dedication to protect our health care system and hold perpetrators accountable.”

    The Health Care Fraud Working Group’s mission is to detect health care fraud through coordinated investigations, information sharing, identification of existing and emerging schemes, and case development. This includes uncovering schemes of fraudulent billing, COVID-19-related fraud, kickback schemes, and fraud targeting government health care programs like Medicare, Medicaid, and TRICARE. The working group also focuses on fraud committed by both corporate entities and individuals, including hospitals, telemedicine companies and providers, nursing home chains, pharmacies and pharmaceutical manufacturers, durable medical equipment suppliers, physicians, therapists, and affiliated health care professionals.

    If you suspect Medicare or Medicaid fraud, please report it by phone at 1-800-HHS-TIPS (1-800-447-8477), or via email at HHSTips@oig.hhs.gov.

    To report Medicaid fraud in North Carolina, call the North Carolina Medicaid Investigations Division at 919-881-2320 or fill out an online complaint form.

    TRICARE fraud can be reported here.

    Fraud against the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs healthcare system can be reported at www.vaoig.gov/hotline.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Security: North Carolina Man Sentenced to Prison for Assaulting Law Enforcement and Other Offenses During January 6 Capitol Breach

    Source: US FBI

                WASHINGTON – A North Carolina man was sentenced to prison today after he was previously convicted of assaulting law enforcement other offenses during the Jan. 6, 2021, breach of the U.S. Capitol. His actions and the actions of others disrupted a joint session of the U.S. Congress convened to ascertain and count the electoral votes related to the 2020 presidential election.

                Brett Alan Rotella, also known as Brett Ostrander, 35, of Kannapolis, North Carolina, was sentenced by U.S. District Judge Randolph D. Moss to 38 months in prison, 36 months of supervised release, and ordered to pay $2,000 in restitution.

                A federal jury previously found Rotella guilty of three felony offenses, including obstruction of law enforcement during a civil disorder, two counts of assaulting, resisting, or impeding certain officers, and several misdemeanors.

                According to court documents and evidence presented during the trial, on Jan. 6, 2021, at approximately 2:24 p.m., Rotella was identified among a crowd of rioters amassed on the West Plaza of the U.S. Capitol building in Washington, D.C., wearing distinctive clothing that included a red skull cap, a black sleeveless puffy vest over a red sleeveless shirt, and white or gray long shorts. He carried a long pole with at least two flags affixed to it at various points during the day.

                According to police body-worn camera footage, just minutes after his arrival at the West Font, Rotella approached a police barricade and forcibly pushed it toward a Metropolitan Police Department officer, while shouting inflammatory remarks.

                At approximately 2:33 p.m., as the police line on the West Plaza became overwhelmed and was forced to retreat, Rotella was observed taking charge of a group of rioters, directing their movements by periodically signaling with his hand to “hold” and leading them up the southwest stairs toward the Capitol.

                Video footage from the Lower West Terrace showed that at approximately 2:40 p.m., Rotella followed retreating officers into the Lower West Terrace Tunnel, the site of some of the most violent attacks against law enforcement that day. Inside the Tunnel, as officers attempted to hold back the rioters, Rotella continued his advance, even after pepper balls containing chemical irritant were fired at him.

                Evidence during the trial showed that the mob, including Rotella, breached the Capitol entrance at the Tunnel by smashing the glass pane of one of the locked doors and forcing the doors open. CCTV and body-worn camera footage depicted Rotella entering the Tunnel and joining others in a concerted effort to physically assault police officers inside. Inside the Tunnel, Rotella pushed against police shields and attempted to leverage his body to push through the police line and into the building.

                Rotella left the Tunnel at approximately 2:55 p.m., but remained in the vicinity for approximately ninety more minutes, joining a large crowd that repeatedly surged against the police line. Further video evidence depicted Rotella counting down and leading a coordinated push by the mob against the officers.

                Rotella was later observed grabbing a large orange ladder and handing it toward the front of the crowd in an apparent attempt to use it against the officers. Video footage showed Rotella pushing the ladder into the Tunnel and pushing against other rioters near him in an effort to collectively breach the police line.

                The FBI arrested Rotella on Aug. 29, 2023, in Mooresville, North Carolina.

                This case was prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia and the Department of Justice National Security Division’s Counterterrorism Section. Valuable assistance was provided by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Western District of North Carolina and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Middle District of North Carolina.

                This case was investigated by the FBI’s Charlotte and Washington Field Offices, which identified Rotella as BOLO (Be on the Lookout) #82 on its seeking information photos. Valuable assistance was provided by the U.S. Capitol Police and the Metropolitan Police Department.

                In the 47 months since Jan. 6, 2021, more than 1,572 individuals have been charged in nearly all 50 states for crimes related to the breach of the U.S. Capitol, including more than 590 individuals charged with assaulting or impeding law enforcement, a felony. The investigation remains ongoing.

                Anyone with tips can call 1-800-CALL-FBI (800-225-5324) or visit tips.fbi.gov.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Security: North Carolina Man Pleads Guilty to Assaulting Law Enforcement During January 6 Capitol Breach

    Source: US FBI

                WASHINGTON – A North Carolina man pleaded guilty today to assaulting law enforcement during the Jan. 6, 2021, breach of the U.S. Capitol. His actions and the actions of others disrupted a joint session of the U.S. Congress convened to ascertain and count the electoral votes related to the 2020 presidential election.

                David Paul Daniel, 37, of Mint Hill, North Carolina, pleaded guilty to a felony offense of assaulting, resisting, or impeding certain officers before U.S. District Judge Trevor N. McFadden. Judge McFadden will sentence Daniel on May 5, 2025.

                According to court documents, Daniel traveled to Washington, D.C., to attend the Jan. 6, 2021, “Stop the Steal” rally on the National Mall.

                At approximately 2:12 p.m., the initial breach of the U.S. Capitol building occurred at a doorway known as the Senate Wing Door. Eventually, U.S. Capitol Police officers were able to stop the influx of rioters from that doorway. To secure the area, the officers, among other efforts, placed heavy wooden structures in front of the Senate Wing Door and nearby windows.

                At approximately 2:42 p.m., a rioter succeeded in once again breaking open the Senate Wing Door, but further entry was blocked by one of the heavy wooden structures, which was placed in front of the door like a barricade. At approximately 2:46 p.m., Daniel moved to the front of the crowd directly in front of that barricade.

                About one minute later, Daniel and another rioter to his right thrust their arms into and forcefully pushed the barricade into the officers standing on the other side. Officers attempted to keep the heavy wooden barricade in place as the crowd swarmed behind Daniel to support the push. Approximately one minute later, rioters succeeded in overwhelming the officers and swarmed into the Senate Wing Door hallway.

                At about 2:49 p.m., Daniel climbed over a pile of wooden structures to exit the Senate Wing Door area through a broken window. Daniel then re-entered the Capitol through another broken window beside the Senate Wing Door. He spent several moments walking around the perimeter of the area just inside the Senate Wing Door, then then walked south down a corridor, through the Small House Rotunda, and entered the Capitol Crypt. After a few moments, Daniel walked back north to the Senate Wing Door, where, at approximately 3:04 p.m., he eventually exited the building through a broken window.

                This case is being prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia and the Department of Justice National Security Division’s Counterterrorism Section. Valuable assistance was provided by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Western District of North Carolina.

                This case is being investigated by the FBI’s Charlotte and Washington Field Offices. Valuable assistance was provided by the U.S. Capitol Police and the Metropolitan Police Department.

                In the 48 months since Jan. 6, 2021, more than 1,583 individuals have been charged in nearly all 50 states for crimes related to the breach of the U.S. Capitol, including more than 600 individuals charged with assaulting or impeding law enforcement, a felony. The investigation remains ongoing.

                Anyone with tips can call 1-800-CALL-FBI (800-225-5324) or visit tips.fbi.gov.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Security: Justice Department Announces North Georgia Results of Operation Restore Justice

    Source: US FBI

    ATLANTA – Between April 28, 2025 through May 1, 2025, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) conducted Operation Restore Justice, a coordinated enforcement effort, by all 55 FBI field offices, United States Attorneys’ Offices across the country, and the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section of the Department of Justice’s Criminal Division (CEOS), to identify, track, and arrest child sex offenders.  The operation resulted in the rescue of 115 children and the arrests of 205 subjects, including six individuals charged in the Northern District of Georgia: Austin Hunter Bedingfield, 27, of Douglasville; Ian Dudar, 26, of Roswell; Kenneth Frazier, 30, of Powder Springs; Eduardo Gardea, 26, of Norcross; Connie Lynn Thompson, 52, of Grantville; and Christopher Welcher, 44, of Grantville.

    “The Department of Justice will never stop fighting to protect victims – especially child victims – and we will not rest until we hunt down, arrest, and prosecute every child predator who preys on the most vulnerable among us,” said Attorney General Pamela Bondi. “I am grateful to the FBI and their state and local partners for their incredible work in Operation Restore Justice and have directed my prosecutors not to negotiate.”

    “Sex crimes against minors are especially heinous,” said U.S. Attorney Theodore S. Hertzberg. “We commend our federal and local law enforcement partners for their tireless efforts to hold accountable those who prey on children and achieve a measure of justice for the victims and their families.”

    “Every child deserves to grow up free from fear and exploitation, and the FBI will continue to be relentless in our pursuit of those who exploit the most vulnerable among us,” said FBI Director Kash Patel. “Operation Restore Justice proves that no predator is out of reach and no child will be forgotten. By leveraging the strength of all our field offices and our federal, state, and local partners, we’re sending a clear message: there is no place to hide for those who prey on children.”

    “Our commitment is resolute. FBI Atlanta remains steadfast in its mission to safeguard children from those who seek to harm society’s most vulnerable,” said Paul Brown, Special Agent in Charge of FBI Atlanta. “However, let there be no confusion – this week’s operation is just one chapter in a relentless, year-round effort that our dedicated agents are fully invested in. We will continue to leverage every tool and resource at our disposal to track down child predators and ensure they face justice.”

    According to U.S. Attorney Hertzberg, the charges, and other information presented in court, the following defendants were arrested in connection with the operation, indicted by federal grand juries seated in the Northern District of Georgia, and have now been arraigned before a United States Magistrate Judge:

    • Austin Hunter Bedingfield was charged with distribution of child sexual abuse material and possession of child sexual abuse material. Bedingfield allegedly distributed graphic videos depicting the abuse of minors to an undercover officer via Kik. FBI agents conducted a search of Bedingfield’s electronic devices and recovered additional images of sexual abuse of minor children. He was arrested on April 30, 2025.
    • Ian Dudar was charged with possession of child sexual abuse material. Dudar allegedly purchased child sexual abuse material using Bitcoin from a commercial child exploitation ring on at least four occasions in 2022.  Later, in January 2024, when FBI agents executed search warrants on his person and home, they found child sexual abuse material on two of his electronic devices. He was arrested on April 29, 2025.
    • Kenneth Frazier was charged with enticement of a minor, receipt of child sexual abuse material, and possession of child sexual abuse material. On November 7, 2024, acting on tips to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, the Cobb County, Georgia, Police Department executed a search warrant at Frazier’s residence in Powder Springs. Officers seized Frazier’s cell phones, which contained hundreds of images and videos of children as young as infants and toddlers forced to engage in sex acts. One of Frazier’s phones also contained chat transcripts in which Frazier allegedly described himself as a “pedophile,” enticed a minor to engage in sexual activity, and received a visual depiction of that minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct. He was arrested on May 2, 2025.
    • Eduardo Gardea was charged with distribution of child sexual abuse material and possession of child sexual abuse material. Gardea allegedly distributed child sexual abuse material on two internet platforms and possessed thousands of images depicting the sexual abuse of children. He was arrested on April 24, 2025.
    • Connie Lynn Thompson was charged with obstruction of justice for allegedly destroying electronic devices to conceal the alleged child exploitation crimes of Christopher Welcher, who was also arrested during the operation, as is more fully described below. Approximately a week after Welcher’s arrest, he allegedly called Thompson from jail and discussed a plan to destroy electronic devices that contained evidence against him. Although Thompson allegedly executed the concealment plan, the FBI recovered the damaged devices from Thompson’s household trash. She was arrested on May 16, 2025.
    • Christopher Welcher was charged with enticement of a minor, interstate travel to engage in an illicit sex act with a minor, possession of child sexual abuse material, and commission of a felony by a registered sex offender. On March 4, 2025, Welcher, a registered sex offender who previously served more than six years in federal prison for distributing child sex abuse materials, allegedly exchanged sexually explicit text messages with an undercover investigator he believed to be a 14-year-old girl. Welcher then drove from Alabama to the vicinity of a northwest Georgia high school to allegedly meet and molest the girl. Police arrested Welcher upon his arrival at the meeting location and seized his phone, which contained hundreds of images of child sex abuse. He was arrested on May 16, 2025.

    Members of the public are reminded that the indictments only contain charges.  The defendants are presumed innocent of the charges and it will be the government’s burden to prove the defendants’ guilt beyond a reasonable doubt at trial.

    United States Attorney Theodore S. Hertzberg and Assistant United States Attorneys James Hwang, Matthew LaGrone, Leanne Marek, and Amy Palumbo are prosecuting these cases.

    These cases are being investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, with valuable assistance from the Cobb County Police Department, Georgia Bureau of Investigation, and Rome/Floyd Metro Drug Task Force.

    This effort follows the Department of Justice’s observance of National Child Abuse Prevention Month in April 2025, and underscores the Department’s unwavering commitment to protecting children and raising awareness about the dangers they face. While the Department, including the FBI and U.S. Attorneys’ Offices, investigate and prosecute these crimes every day, April served as a powerful reminder of the importance of preventing these crimes, seeking justice for victims, and raising awareness through community education.

    The Department is committed to combating child sexual exploitation. These cases were brought as part of Project Safe Childhood, a nationwide initiative to combat the epidemic of child sexual exploitation and abuse launched in May 2006 by the Department. Led by U.S. Attorneys’ Offices and CEOS, Project Safe Childhood marshals federal, state, and local resources to better locate, apprehend, and prosecute individuals who exploit children via the internet, as well as to identify and rescue victims. For more information about Project Safe Childhood, visit www.justice.gov/psc.

    The Department partners with and oversees funding grants for the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC), which receives and shares tips about possible child sexual exploitation received through its 24/7 hotline at 1-800-THE-LOST and on missingkids.org. The Department urges the public to remain vigilant and report suspected exploitation of a child through the FBI’s tipline at 1-800-CALL-FBI (225-5324), tips.fbi.gov, or by calling your local FBI field office.

    For further information please contact the U.S. Attorney’s Public Affairs Office at USAGAN.PressEmails@usdoj.gov or (404) 581-6280.  The Internet address for the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of Georgia is http://www.justice.gov/usao-ndga.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Security: Ohio Man Arrested on Felony and Misdemeanor Charges for Actions During January 6 Capitol Breach

    Source: US FBI

                 WASHINGTON — An Ohio man was arrested on felony and misdemeanor charges related to his alleged conduct during the Jan. 6, 2021, breach of the U.S. Capitol. His alleged actions and the actions of others disrupted a joint session of the U.S. Congress convened to ascertain and count the electoral votes related to the 2020 presidential election.

                 David Valentine, 46, of Wilmington, Ohio, is charged in a criminal complaint filed in the District of Columbia with a felony charge of civil disorder. In addition to the felony, Valentine is charged with misdemeanor offenses of knowingly entering or remaining in any restricted building or grounds without lawful, knowingly, and with intent to impede or disrupt the orderly conduct of government business or official functions and disorderly conduct in a Capitol building or grounds.

                 Valentine was arrested on Aug. 22, 2024, in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, and he made his initial appearance in the Eastern District of Wisconsin.

                 According to court documents, Valentine was identified within the restricted grounds of the U.S. Capitol building at around 1:30 p.m. on Jan. 6, 2021, near a line of police officers and bike-rack barricades preventing rioters from advancing toward the U.S. Capitol building. At about 1:40 p.m., rioters carried and passed a large metal-framed “Trump 2020” sign toward the police line.

                 It is alleged that when the sign reached the police line, Valentine joined the rioters who pushed the sign against the police officers. It is alleged that Valentine reached for the sign with his right hand and pushed the sign. The rioters used the large sign as a battering ram against the officers who were holding the line and attempted to breach the bike-rack barricades while the officers were attacked with the large sign.

                 Later, Valentine was identified on the West Plaza of Capitol grounds and was seen entering a lower part of the Inaugural stage within the West Plaza. Valentine then allegedly climbed into an area that appeared to be under construction and seemed to cut some wires with a folding knife.

                 At about 2:30 p.m., members of the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) retreated to an area inside the archway of the U.S. Capitol building’s Lower West Terrace Doors, referred to as the Tunnel. The Tunnel was the site of some of the most violent attacks against law enforcement on January 6th.  There, rioters massed in front of the Tunnel and attacked police officers, pushing in a collective effort to overwhelm the police officers guarding this entrance to the building. Valentine was present outside the Tunnel.

                 At approximately 5:00 p.m., rioters collectively pushed against the police officers in the Tunnel, and Valentine allegedly joined the group, placing his hand against the back of the rioter in front of him before being repelled by a chemical irritant.

                 This case is being prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia and the Department of Justice National Security Division’s Counterterrorism Section. Valuable assistance was provided by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Ohio and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Wisconsin.

                 The case is being investigated by the FBI’s Cincinnati and Washington Field Offices. Valuable assistance was provided by the U.S. Capitol Police and the Metropolitan Police Department.

                 In the 43 months since Jan. 6, 2021, more than 1,488 individuals have been charged in nearly all 50 states for crimes related to the breach of the U.S. Capitol, including nearly 550 individuals charged with assaulting or impeding law enforcement, a felony. The investigation remains ongoing.

                 Anyone with tips can call 1-800-CALL-FBI (800-225-5324) or visit tips.fbi.gov.

                 A complaint is merely an allegation, and all defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Alleged irregularities in the bailout of Air Europe by the Spanish Government – E-001956/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-001956/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Dolors Montserrat (PPE)

    There is mounting proof that the EUR 475 million public bailout of Air Europe was directly forced by the government of Pedro Sánchez. Messages between members of the government show that the Prime Minister, his wife and ministers Jesús Ábalos, Nadia Calviño and María Jesús Montero intervened to speed up the operation.

    In addition, a senior member of the Prime Minister’s team – Manuel de la Rocha, who has no ministerial powers – participated in the vote with no legal basis for doing so. The aid was granted exceptionally quickly, with the loans being split up into smaller amounts to get around the obligation to notify the Commission.

    As the Court of Auditors pointed out, members of the government were not involved in other bailouts, which suggests possible political interference. There were 72 bailouts in which the government had no involvement, and this highlights the preferential treatment given in the case at hand.

    In view of the above:

    • 1.Will the Commission be opening an investigation into the bailout of Air Europe in order to establish whether it was in line with Article 2 TEU and State aid rules?
    • 2.What steps is the Commission intending to take to ensure that exceptional State aid granted owing to the pandemic is in strict compliance with EU law?

    Submitted: 15.5.2025

    Last updated: 22 May 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Latest news – Ordinary Delegation meeting (in camera) – 5 June 2025, Brussels – Delegation to the EU-Albania Stabilisation and Association Parliamentary Committee

    Source: European Parliament

    The Delegation for relations with Albania will meet on Thursday, 5 June from 10.00until 11.30 in room SPINELLI 3G2.

    The Members of the Delegation will have an exchange of views with representatives from the European Commission and the European External Action Service on the political and economic situation in the Republic of Albania, and its relations with the European Union in preparation of the upcoming 19th EU-Albania SAPC.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Press Briefing Transcript: Julie Kozack, Director, Communications Department, May 22, 2025

    Source: IMF – News in Russian

    May 22, 2025

    SPEAKER:  Ms. Julie Kozack, Director of the Communications Department, IMF

    MS. KOZACK: Good morning, everyone and welcome to this IMF Press Briefing.  It is wonderful to see you all today on this rainy Washington morning, especially those of you here in person and of course also those of you joining us online.  My name is Julie Kozak.  I’m the Director of Communications at the IMF.  As usual, this press briefing will be embargoed until 11:00 a.m. Eastern Time in the United States.  And as usual, I will start with a few announcements and then I’ll take your questions in person on WebEx and via the Press Center.  

    So first, our Managing Director, Kristalina Georgieva, and our First Deputy Managing Director, Gita Gopinath, are currently attending the G7 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors meeting taking place in Canada right now.  Second, on May 29th through 30th, the Managing Director will travel to Dubrovnik, Croatia to attend a joint IMF Croatia National Bank Conference focused on promoting growth and resilience in Central, Eastern, and Southeastern Europe.  The Managing Director will participate in the opening panel and will hold meetings with regional counterparts.  

    On June 2nd, the Managing Director will travel to Sofia, Bulgaria to attend the 30th Anniversary celebration of the National Trust Ecofund.  During her visit, she will also hold several bilateral meetings with the Bulgarian authorities.  

    Our Deputy Managing Director, Nigel Clarke, will travel to Paraguay, Brazil, and the Netherlands next month.  On June 6th, he will launch the IMF’s new regional training program for South America and Mexico, which will be hosted in Asuncion by the Central Bank of Paraguay.  From there, he will travel to Brasilia to deliver a keynote speech on June 10th during the Annual Meeting of the Caribbean Development Bank.  He will also then travel to the Netherlands on June 12th to 13th to participate in the 2025 Consultative Group to Assist the Poor Symposium and to meet with the Dutch authorities.  

    Our Deputy Managing Director, Kenji Okamura, will be in Japan from June 11th to 12th for the 10th Tokyo Fiscal Forum to discuss fiscal frameworks and GovTech in the Asia Pacific region.  

    And finally, on a kind of housekeeping or scheduling issue, the Article IV Consultation for the United States will be undertaken on a later timetable this year, with discussions to be held in November.  

    And with those rather extensive announcements, I will now open the floor to your questions.  For those connecting virtually, please turn on both your camera and microphone when speaking.  All right, let’s open up.  Daniel.

     

    QUESTIONER: Thanks for taking my question.  I just wonder if the IMF has any reaction to the passage of last night in the House of Representatives of the One Big, Beautiful bill.  And a related question, how concerned are you by the increase in yields on long-dated U.S. treasuries?  What do you think it says about the market’s view of U.S. debt going into the future and sort of any possible spillovers for IMF borrowers as well?  MS. KOZACK: On the first question, what I can say is we take note of the passing of the legislation in the House of Representatives earlier this morning.  What we will do is we will look to assess a final bill once it has passed through the Senate and also once it’s been enacted.  And, of course, we will have opportunities to share our assessment over time in the various products where we normally would convey our fulsome views.  

    On your second question, which was on the bond market.   What I can say there is that we know that the U.S. government bonds are a safe haven asset, and the U.S. dollar, of course, plays a key role as the world’s reserve currency.  The U.S. bond market plays a critical role, of course, in finance and in safe assets.  And this is underpinned by the liquidity and depth of the U.S. market and also the sound institutions in the U.S.  We don’t see any changes in those functions.  And, of course, what we can also say is that although there has been some volatility in markets, market functioning, including in the U.S. Treasury market, has so far been orderly.  

     

    QUESTIONER: My question is about Ukraine.  Two topics particularly.  So, the first one, when is the next review of the Ukraine’s EFF is going to be completed, and what amount of money would be disbursed to Kyiv?  And could you please outline the total sum that is remaining within the current program?  And the second part, it’s about debt level.  What is the IMF assessment of current Ukraine’s government debt level?  Is it stable?  Do you see any vulnerabilities and any risks for Ukraine?  Thank you.  

    MS. KOZACK: Any other questions on Ukraine?  Does anyone online want to come in on Ukraine?  Okay, I don’t see anyone.  

    What I can say on Ukraine is that just two days ago, our Staff team started policy discussions with the Ukrainian authorities on the eighth review under the eff.  So, the team is on the ground now.  The discussions are taking place in Kiev and the team will provide an update on the progress at the end of the mission.

    In terms of the potential disbursement, I’m just looking here; that’s the seventh disbursement.  We will come back to you on the size of the disbursement, but it should show in the Staff report for the Seventh Review what would be expected for the Eighth Review.  And it would also show the remaining size of the program.  But we’ll come back to you bilaterally with those exact answers.  

    And what I can then say on the debt side is at the time of the Seventh Review under the program, we assessed debt, Ukraine’s debt to be sustainable on a forward-looking basis and as with every review that the team of course, will update its assessment as part of the eighth review discussion.  We’ll have more to say on the debt as the eighth review continues.  

     

    QUESTIONER: Just one more thing on Ukraine.  Does it make sense for them to consider using the euro as a defense currency for their currency, given the shifting geopolitical sense and what we are seeing with the dollar? MS. KOZACK: So right now, under the program, Ukraine has an inflation targeting regime, and that is where what the program is focused on, our program with Ukraine. So, they have an inflation targeting regime.  They are very much focused on ensuring the stability of that monetary policy regime that Ukraine has.  And, of course, that involves a floating exchange rate.  And I don’t have anything beyond that to say on the currency market.

     

    QUESTIONER: The agreement with the IMF established a target for the Central Bank Reserve to meet by June.  According to the technical projection, does the IMF believe Argentina will meet this target?  And if it’s not met, is it possible that we will grant a waiver in the future?

    MS. KOZACK: anything else on Argentina?  

    QUESTIONER: About Argentina, what is your assessment of the progress of the program agreed with Argentina more than a month after its announcement in last April?  

     

    QUESTIONER: The government is about to announce a measure to gain access to voluntarily, of course, but to the dollars that are “under the mattress”, as we call them, undeclared funds to probably meet these targets that Roman was asking about.  I was wondering if this measure has been discussed with the IMF.  And also, you mentioned Georgieva visiting Paraguay and Brazil, if you there’s any plan to visit Argentina as well?  

    QUESTIONER: President Milei is about to announce, you know, Minister Caputo, in a few minutes that there is a measure to use similar to attacks Amnesty.  Is the IMF concerned that this could violate its regulations against illicit financial flows? 

    MS. KOZACK: So, with respect to Argentina, on April 11th, I think, as you know, our Executive Board approved a new four-year EFF arrangement for Argentina.  It was for $20 billion.  It contained an initial disbursement of $12 billion.  And that the aim of that program is to support Argentina’s transition to the next phase of its stabilization program and reforms.  

    President Milei’s administration’s policies continued to deliver impressive results.  These include the rollout of the new FX regime, which has been smooth, a decline in monthly inflation to 2.8 percent in April, another fiscal surplus in April, and reaching a cumulative fiscal surplus of 0.6 percent of GDP for the year, and efforts to continue to open up the economy.  At the same time, the economy is now expanding, real wages are recovering, and poverty continues to fall in Argentina.  

    The Fund continues to support the authorities in their efforts to create a more stable and prosperous Argentina.  Our close engagement continues, including in the context of the upcoming discussions for the First Review of the program.  This First Review will allow us to assess progress and to consider policies to build on the strong momentum and to secure lasting stability and growth in Argentina.  And in this regard, there is a shared recognition with the authorities about the importance of strengthening external buffers and securing a timely re-access to international capital markets.  

    What I can say on the question about the announcements on that — the question on the undeclared assets.  All I can say right now is that we’re following developments very closely on this, and of course, the team will be ready to provide an assessment in due course.  

    On the second part of that question, I do want to also note, and this is included in our Staff report, that the authorities have committed to strengthening financial transparency and also to aligning Argentina’s AML CFT, the Anti-Money Laundering framework, with international standards, as well as to deregulating the economy to encourage its formalization.  So, any new measures, including those that may be aimed at encouraging the use of undeclared assets, should be, of course, consistent with these important commitments.  

    And on your question about Paraguay and Brazil, I just want to clarify that it is our Deputy Managing Director, Nigel Clarke, who will be traveling to Brazil and Paraguay, not the Managing Director.  

     

    QUESTIONER: Two questions on Syria.  With the U.S. and EU announcing the lifting of sanctions recently, how does this affect any sort of timeline with providing economic assistance?  And secondly, the Managing Director has said that the Fund has to first define data.  Can you just walk through what that entails?  

    MS. KOZACK: Can you just repeat what you said?  The Managing Director has said?

     

    QUESTIONER: The need to define data.  Just sort of a similar question.  I’m just wondering, following the World Bank statement last week about, you know, Syria now being eligible to borrow from the bank, what sort of discussions the Fund has had with the Syrian authorities since the end of the Spring Meetings and, you know, any update you can give us around possible discussions around an Article IV.  

     

    QUESTIONER: About the relationship and if there’s any missed planned virtual or on the ground? 

    MS. KOZACK: Let me step back and give a little bit of an overview on Syria. So, first, you know, we’re, of course, monitoring developments in Syria very closely.  Our Staff are preparing to support the international community’s efforts to help with Syria’s economic rehabilitation as conditions allow.  We have had useful discussions with the new Economic Team who took office in late March, including during the Spring Meetings.  And, of course, you will perhaps have seen the press release regarding the roundtable that was held during the Spring Meetings.  IMF Staff have already started to work to rebuild its understanding of the Syrian economy.  We’ve been doing this through interactions with the authorities and also through coordination with other IFIs. And just to remind everyone, our last Article IV with Syria was in 2009.  So, it’s been quite some time since we have had a substantive engagement with Syria.  Syria will need significant assistance to rebuild its economic institutions.  We stand ready to provide advice and targeted and well-prioritized technical assistance in our areas of expertise. I think this goes a little bit to your question on, like, what do we mean by defining data.  I think what the Managing Director was really referring to there is since it has been such a long time since we have had a substantive engagement with Syria, the last Article IV, as I said, was in 2009.  I think there, what she’s really referring to is the need to really work with the Syrian authorities to rebuild basic economic institutions, including the ability to produce economic statistics, right, so that we — so that we and the authorities and the international community of course, can conduct the necessary economic analysis so that we can best support the reconstruction and recovery efforts.  

    With respect to the lifting of sanctions, what I can say there is that, of course, the lifting of sanctions and the lifting of sanctions are a matter between member states of the IMF.  What we can say in serious cases that the lifting of sanctions could support Syria’s efforts to overcome its economic challenges and help advance its reconstruction and economic development.  Syria, of course, is an IMF member, and as we’ve just said, you know, we are, of course, engaged closely with the Syrians to explore how, within our mandate, we can best support them.  

     

    QUESTIONER: My question is on Russia.  In what ways is the IMF monitoring Russia’s economy under the current sanctions and conflict conditions, and have regular Article IV Consultations or other surveillance activities with Russia resumed to track its economic developments?  

    MS. KOZACK: What I can say with respect to Russia is that we are, our Staff, are analyzing data and economic indicators that are reported by the Russian authorities.  We are also looking at counterparty data that is provided to us by other countries, and this is particularly true for cross-border transactions, as well as data from third-party sources. So, this data collection using official and other sources does allow us to put together a picture of the Russian economy.  

    We did provide an assessment in the 2025 April WEO, the one that we just released about a month ago.  In this WEO, we assess Russia’s growth at — we expect Russia to grow at 1.5 percent in 2025, 0.9 percent in 2026, and we expect inflation to come down to 8.2 percent in 2025 and 4.4 percent in 2026.  And I don’t have a timetable for the Article IV at this time.  

     

    QUESTIONER: I’d like to ask about Deputy Management Director Okamura’s visits to Japan.  So, my question is, what economic topics will be on the agenda during his stay?  Could you tell me a bit more in detail?  

    MS. KOZACK: Deputy Managing Director Okamura will travel to Japan, as I said, from June 11th to 12th, and he will be attending the Tokyo Fiscal Forum.  So, this will be the 10th Tokyo Fiscal Forum.  It’s an annual conference that we co-host in Japan every year and the focus is on issues of fiscal policy. In this particular one, Deputy Managing Director Okamura will be discussing fiscal frameworks. It’s very important for all countries to have sound fiscal frameworks so they can implement sound fiscal policy.  He will also be discussing GovTech not only in Japan but in the Asia Pacific region.  And of course, GovTech is very important for countries because it’s a way of modernizing and making government both provision of services in some cases but also potentially collection of revenue more effective and more efficient.  So, those will be the focus of his discussions in Tokyo.  

     

    QUESTIONER: I have a question on the recent bailout package by IMF to Pakistan.  The Indian government has expressed a lot of displeasure with Pakistan planning to use this package to build — rebuild — areas that allegedly support cross-border terrorism.  Does the IMF have any assessment of this?  Secondly, I also have another question.  Could you please provide information on the majority vote that was received in approving this bailout package for Pakistan on May 9th?  If you can disclose the information.  

    MS. KOZACK: Any other questions on Pakistan?  

     

    QUESTIONER: Just adding to that, do you have an update on the implications of the escalation of facilities in that border between Pakistan and India on both economies.  

     

    QUESTIONER: Thanks a lot.  I guess the only spin I would put on is generally what safeguards does the IMF have that its funds won’t be used for military or in support of military actions, not only there but as a general matter.  And I also, if you’re able to, there was some controversy about the termination of India’s Executive Director of the IMF, K.V. Subramanian.  Do you have any insight into–there are reports there–what it was about but what do you say it’s about?  Thanks a lot.  

    MS. KOZACK: With respect to the Indian Executive Director who had been at the Fund, all I can say on this is that the appointment of Executive Directors is a member for the — is a matter for the member country.  It’s not a matter for the Fund, and it’s completely up to the country authorities to determine who represents them at the Fund.  

    With respect to Pakistan and the conflict with India, I want to start here by first expressing our regrets and sympathies for the loss of life and for the human toll from the recent conflict.  We do hope for a peaceful resolution of the conflict.  

    Now, turning to some of the specific questions about the Board approval of Pakistan’s program, I’m going to step back a minute and provide a little bit of the chronology and timeframe.  The IMF Executive Board approved Pakistan’s EFF program in September of 2024.  And the First review at that time was planned for the first quarter of 2025.  And consistent with that timeline, on March 25th of 2025, the IMF Staff and the Pakistani authorities reached a Staff-Level Agreement on the First Review for the EFF.  That agreement, that Staff-Level Agreement, was then presented to our Executive Board, and our Executive Board completed the review on May 9th.  As a result of the completion of that review, Pakistan received the disbursement at that time.  

    What I want to emphasize here is that it is part of a standard procedure under programs that our Executive Board conducts periodic reviews of lending programs to assess their progress.  And they particularly look at whether the program is on track, whether the conditions under the program have been met, and whether any policy changes are needed to bring the program back on track.  And in the case of Pakistan, our Board found that Pakistan had indeed met all of the targets.  It had made progress on some of the reforms, and for that reason, the Board went ahead and approved the program.  

    With respect to the voting or the decision-making at our Board, we do not disclose that publicly.  In general, Fund Board decisions are taken by consensus, and in this case, there was a sufficient consensus at the Board to allow us to move forward or for the Board to decide to move forward and complete Pakistan’s review.  

    And with respect to the question on safeguards, I do want to make three points here.  The first is that IMF financing is provided to members for the purpose of resolving balance of payments problems.  

    In the case of Pakistan, and this is my second point, the EFF disbursements, all of the disbursements received under the EFF, are allocated to the reserves of the central bank.  So, those disbursements are at the central bank, and under the program, those resources are not part of budget financing.  They are not transferred to the government to support the budget. 

    And the third point is that the program provides additional safeguards through our conditionality.  And these include, for example, targets on the accumulation of international reserves.  It includes a zero target, meaning no lending from the central bank to the government.  And the program also includes substantial structural conditionality around improving fiscal management.  And these conditions are all available in the program documents if you wanted to do a deeper dive.  And, of course, any deviation from the established program conditions would impact future reviews under the Pakistan program.  

     

    QUESTIONER: I have a question on Egypt.  There is a mission in Egypt for the First Review of the EFF loan program.  So, can you please update us on the ongoing discussions, especially since the Prime Minister of Egypt announced yesterday that the program could be concluded in 2027 rather than 2026?  

    MS. KOZACK: Any other questions on Egypt?  I have a question from the Press Center on Egypt, which I will read aloud.  The question is when will the Fifth Review currently underway with the Egyptian government be concluded, and when will the Executive Board approve this review?  And how much money will Egypt receive once the review is approved?  

    So, here’s what I can share on Egypt.  First, let me start here.  So first, I just want to say that the Fund remains committed to supporting Egypt in building its economic resilience and fostering higher private sector-led growth.  Egypt has made clear progress on its macroeconomic reform program, with notable improvements in inflation and foreign exchange reserves.  For the past few weeks, IMF Staff has had productive discussions with the Egyptian authorities on economic performance and policies under the EFF.  As Egypt’s macroeconomic stabilization is taking hold, efforts must now focus on accelerating and deepening reforms that will reduce the footprint of the state in the Egyptian economy, level the playing field, and improve the business environment.  Discussions will continue between the IMF and the Egyptian authorities on the remaining policies and reforms that could support the completion of the Fifth Review.  

     

    QUESTIONER: My question is about Sri Lanka.  Sri Lanka’s program is subject to IMF Board approval.  The review is subject to IMF Board approval, but we still haven’t got any word on when that would be.  Is there any delay in this?  And is this delay attributed to the pending electricity adjustments, tariff adjustments, that the Sri Lankan government has committed to?  

    MS. KOZACK: So just stepping back for a minute.  On April 25th, IMF Staff and the Sri Lankan authorities reached Staff-Level Agreement on the Fourth Review of Sri Lanka’s program under the EFF.  And once the review is approved by our Executive Board, Sri Lanka will have access to about $344 million in financing.  Completion of the review is subject to approval by the Executive Board, and we expect that Board meeting to take place in the coming weeks.  

    The precise timing of the Board meeting is contingent on two things.  The first is implementation of prior actions, and the main prior actions are relating to restoring electricity, cost recovery pricing and ensuring proper function of the automatic electricity price adjustment mechanism.  And the second contingency is completion of the Financing Assurances Review, which will focus on confirming multilateral partners, committed financing contributions to Sri Lanka and whether adequate progress has been made in debt restructuring.  So, in a nutshell, completion of the review is subject to approval by the Executive Board.  We expect the Board meeting to take place in the coming weeks.  And it’s contingent on the two matters that I just mentioned.  

     

    QUESTIONER: Thank you for having my questions on Ecuador.  Since the IMF is still completing the second review under the EFF program for Ecuador, do you think it’s going to be time to change the program, the goals, or maybe the amount of the program?  Because Ecuador is now facing different challenges compared to 2024.  The oil prices are falling, so that is going to affect the fiscal situation for Ecuador.  And also, I would like to know if Ecuador is still looking for a new program under the RSF.  And the last one, I would like to know if, do you think that Ecuador is going to need to make some important changes this year on oil subsidies and a tax reform?  I think, as I said, Ecuador now is facing some important challenges in the fiscal situation, so do you think it’s going to be possible because of, you know, all the social protests and all that kind of stuff?  Do you think it’s going to be possible to do that in Ecuador?  

     

    QUESTIONER: Is there a request, an official request, in place to modify the program?  And if there is, of course, details of the new one, you can share.  

    MS. KOZACK: And then I have one question online from the Press Center regarding Ecuador.  Is the sovereign negotiating new targets, given their fiscal position deteriorated compared to last year?  Our understanding is that $410 million was not dispersed under the First Review.?

    So let me share what I can on Ecuador.  So, right now, representatives from the IMF, the World Bank, and the Inter-American Development Bank are in Quito this week to meet with the authorities and discuss the strengthening of financial and technical support to the country.  As part of this tripartite visit, we have a new IMF Mission Chief who is participating, and she is also using that opportunity to have courtesy meetings with the authorities and to continue discussions and advance toward a Second Review under Ecuador’s EFF.  

    What else I can add, just as background, is that the Executive Board in December approved the First Review of Ecuador’s 48-month EFF.  About $500 million was disbursed after the approval of that Frist Review.  And at that time, the Executive Board also concluded the Article IV Consultation.

    I can also say that the authorities have made excellent progress in the implementation of their economic program under the EFF.  And regarding the precise timing of the Second Review, we will provide an update on the next steps in due course and when we’re able to do so.  

     

    QUESTIONER: Just a quick question on tariffs.  I’m just wondering if the IMF has a response to the U.S.-China deal that was struck in Geneva earlier this month.  You know, if the deal holds, I appreciate it’s a 90-day pause, but if the deal holds, how would you foresee that changing the Fund’s current economic forecast for the U.S. and China and for the global economy?  Thanks.  

    MS. KOZACK: As you noted, earlier in May, China and the U.S. announced a 90-day rollback of most of the bilateral tariffs imposed since April 2nd, and they established a mechanism to discuss economic and trade relations.  The two sides reduced their tariff from peak levels, leaving in place 10 percent additional tariffs.  So, the additional tariffs before this agreement were 125 percent.  Now, the additional tariff has agreed to be 10 percent, you know, for the 90 days.  This is obviously a positive step for the world’s two largest economies.

    What I can also add is that for the U.S., you may recall, during the Spring Meetings, we talked a lot about the overall effective tariff rate for the U.S.  At that time, we assessed it at 25.5 percent.  This announcement and the reduction in tariffs will bring the U.S. effective tariff rate down to a bit over 14 percent.  

    Now, with respect to the impact, what I can say is that the reduction in tariffs and the easing of tensions does provide some upside risk to our global growth forecast.  We will be updating that global growth forecast as part of our July WEO.  And so that will give us an opportunity to provide a full assessment.  All of this said, of course, the outlook, the global outlook in general does remain one of high uncertainty.  And so that uncertainty is still with us.  

     

    QUESTIONER: I have a broad question regarding the following – at the IMF World Bank Spring Meeting, the recent one,  the Treasury Secretary Bessent called for the IMF and the World Bank to refocus on their core mission on macroeconomic stability and development.  Did the IMF start any discussion on this topic with the U.S. administration?  And my second question, do you foresee any changes to your lending programs to take into account the views of the Trump Administration regarding issues like climate change and international development?  Thank you.  

    MS. KOZACK: What I can say on this is the U.S. is our largest shareholder, and we greatly value the voice of the United States.  We have a constructive engagement with the U.S. authorities, and we very much appreciate Secretary Bessent’s reiteration of the United States’ commitment to the Fund and to our role.  The IMF has a clearly defined mandate to support economic and financial stability globally.  Our Management Team and our entire Staff are focused exactly on this mandate, helping our 191 members tackle their economic challenges and their balance of payments risks.  

    What I can also add is that at the most recent Spring Meetings, the ones we just had in April, our membership identified two areas where they’ve asked the IMF to deepen our work.  And the first is on external imbalances, and the second is on our monitoring of the financial sector.  So they’re looking for us to really deepen our work in these two areas.  

    As far as taking that work forward, we will continue working with our Executive Board on these areas, as well as to carry out some important policy reviews.  And I think the Managing Director referred to these during the Spring Meetings.  The first is the Comprehensive Surveillance Review, which will set out our surveillance priorities for the next five years.  And the second is the review of program design and conditionality.  And that will carefully consider how our lending can best help countries address low growth challenges and durably resolve their balance of payments weaknesses.  

    I have a slight update for you on Ukraine, which says — so the eighth — so if we look at the documents that were published at the time of the Seventh Review program, the one that was approved by the Executive Board a little while ago, based on that, the Eighth Review disbursement would be about $520 million.  And, the discussions of the Eighth Review are ongoing, and any disbursement, as always, is subject to approval by our Executive Board. 

    And with that, I will bring this press briefing to a close.  So first, let me thank you all for your participation today.  As a reminder, the briefing is embargoed until 11:00 a.m. Eastern Time in the United States.  As always, a transcript will be made available later on IMF.org.  In case of any clarifications or additional queries, please do not hesitate to reach out to my colleagues at media@imf.org.  This concludes our press briefing, and I wish everyone a wonderful day.  I look forward to seeing you next time.  Thanks very much.

     

      

    *  *  *  *  *

     

    IMF Communications Department
    MEDIA RELATIONS

    PRESS OFFICER: Meera Louis

    Phone: +1 202 623-7100Email: MEDIA@IMF.org

    https://www.imf.org/en/News/Articles/2025/05/22/tr-05222025-com-regular-press-briefing-may-22-2025

    MIL OSI

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI Canada: Alberta-Hokkaido: 45 years in the making

    Source: Government of Canada regional news (2)

    MIL OSI Canada News

  • MIL-OSI Canada: G7 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors’ Communiqué

    Source: Government of Canada News

    Statement

    Banff, May 20-22, 2025

    1. We, the G7 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors, met on May 20-22, 2025 in Banff, Canada together with the Heads of the International Monetary Fund (IMF), World Bank Group (WBG), Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), and Financial Stability Board (FSB). We were also joined by Ukrainian Finance Minister Sergii Marchenko and the President of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) for parts of the meeting.
    2. We began by reiterating our shared commitment to the G7. After 50 years of working together, transcending national differences and promoting global prosperity, the value of the G7 is clear. We held a productive and frank exchange of views on the current global economic and financial situation, the risks and opportunities common to our countries, and ways to address them. This joint statement reflects the outcome of the discussion between G7 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors during the meeting.  

    Global Economy

    1. In the face of multiple complex global challenges, we are committed to pursuing our shared policy objectives. We agree that the G7 can leverage our strong economic relationships to advance our common goals. International organizations signaled at our last meeting that trade and economic policy uncertainty was high and weighing on global growth. We acknowledge that economic policy uncertainty has declined from its peak, and we will work together to achieve further progress. We also shared our concerns over unsustainable global macro imbalances.
    2. In this respect, we also underscore the need to address excessive imbalances and strengthen macro fundamentals, given potential global spillovers. We call on the IMF to continue to enhance its analysis of imbalances in both its bilateral and multilateral surveillance. We continue to engage with each other and with international partners to advance international cooperation and deliver prosperity.
    3. Strong and sustainable economic growth is the cornerstone of economic prosperity. We are committed to working together to achieve a balanced and growth-oriented macroeconomic policy mix that supports our economic security and resilience and ensures that all of our citizens can benefit from that growth. We are committed to maintaining well-functioning financial markets. We recognize that elevated uncertainty can have implications for the economy and for financial stability. We will continue to monitor and consult closely on these matters. Our central banks remain strongly committed to ensuring price stability, consistent with their respective mandates. We reaffirm our May 2017 exchange rate commitments.

    Economic Resilience and Security

    1. We recognize the need for a common understanding of how non-market policies and practices (NMPPs) aggravate imbalances, contribute to overcapacity, and impact the economic security of other countries. Building on our previous commitments and as guided by Leaders, we will contribute, as appropriate, to the monitoring of NMPPs, continuing to assess the distortions they cause in markets and their global spillovers. We agree on the importance of a level playing field and taking a broadly coordinated approach to address the harm caused by those who do not abide by the same rules and lack transparency.
    2. We call on international organizations to address data gaps and deepen our collective understanding of NMPPs and their domestic and global implications. We agree that joint analysis of market concentration and international supply chain resilience would be useful areas of future work. This analysis will inform our respective policy approaches, which will in part be shaped by our underlying industrial and consumer structures. Where appropriate and relevant, we will engage partners beyond the G7.
    3. We recognize a significant increase in international low-value shipments being sent to our economies in a decentralized manner, and the potential for this to overwhelm and take advantage of customs controls and duty and tax collection infrastructure. Collectively, we recognize the potential for illicit drug trafficking, the importation of counterfeit goods, the misclassification of merchandise, revenue leakage, inequity for our retailers, and significant environmental waste. We commit to exploring ways that our low-value importation systems could address these risks.

    Support for Ukraine

    1. We condemn Russia’s continued brutal war against Ukraine and commend the immense resilience from the Ukrainian people and economy. Ukraine has suffered significant destruction. The G7 remains committed to unwavering support for Ukraine in defending its territorial integrity and right to exist, and its freedom, sovereignty and independence toward a just and durable peace.
    2. We welcome ongoing efforts to achieve a ceasefire. If such a ceasefire is not agreed, we will continue to explore all possible options, including options to maximize pressure such as further ramping up sanctions. We reaffirm that, consistent with our respective legal systems, Russia’s sovereign assets in our jurisdictions will remain immobilized until Russia ends its aggression and pays for the damage it has caused to Ukraine.
    3. We agree that private sector mobilization will be important in the recovery and reconstruction of Ukraine, with costs estimated by the WBG at US$524 billion over the next decade. We collectively commit to help build investor confidence through bilateral and multilateral initiatives. To this end, in addition to the ongoing support through the MIGA SURE (Support for Ukraine’s Reconstruction and Economy) trust fund, we will work, including through the Ukraine Donor Platform, with the Government of Ukraine, international financial institutions (IFIs), and the insurance industry towards removing the blanket ban imposed on Ukraine as soon as possible. We will continue to coordinate support to promote the early recovery and reconstruction of Ukraine, including at the Ukraine Recovery Conference, which will take place in Rome on July 10-11, 2025. Further, we agree to work together with Ukraine to ensure that no countries or entities, or entities from those countries that financed or supplied the Russian war machine will be eligible to profit from Ukraine’s reconstruction.

    Bolstering Long-term Growth and Productivity

    1. We agree on the importance of pursuing public policies that spur innovation, raise productivity and promote greater labour force participation. In an environment of high public debt and increasing fiscal pressures, we also agree that raising long-term growth potential is essential to manage risks to fiscal sustainability and increase wages and living standards.
    2. We discussed and shared experiences on how best to pursue growth-enhancing policies in a fiscally prudent manner. We agree that structural reforms can help set the foundations for strong and sustainable economic growth. We recognize that specific growth policies need to be adapted to each country’s needs and circumstances. We agree that maintaining a stable and predictable macroeconomic environment is important for strong growth and productive long-term investment.

    Artificial Intelligence

    1. We deepened our understanding of prospects for AI to raise productivity growth, and of the policies needed to realize the benefits. We appreciate the framework provided by the OECD to better quantify and monitor AI-driven productivity gains. We recognized the benefits of AI for the financial sector and the need to monitor and assess potential risks to financial stability as AI adoption further increases.

    Financial Sector Issues

    1. We are committed to a strong, resilient and stable financial sector. We reiterate that a continued focus on financial stability and regulatory issues remains vital to ensure the effective functioning of the financial system. We noted our support for the important work of the FSB and Standard Setting Bodies. We focused on non-bank financial intermediaries, which play an increasingly important role in financing the real economy. Their activities can contribute to the efficiency of financial markets but can also pose risks to the global financial system. We discussed sources of potential risk, including those from liquidity mismatch, leverage and interconnectedness. We agree on the need to assess non-bank data availability, use and quality and to share knowledge and approaches to monitoring and assessing potential risks.
    2. Enhancing cross-border payments can have widespread benefits for citizens and economies worldwide. We remain committed to delivering cheaper, faster, more transparent and more accessible cross-border payments while maintaining their safety, resilience, and financial integrity. This includes supporting the implementation of the G20 Roadmap as well as appropriate future actions as necessary to meet these goals.
    3. Cyber risks threaten to disrupt global financial systems and the institutions that support them. To address the evolving cyber threat landscape, we will continue to take action to further strengthen our shared response capabilities and protocols in the event of a significant cyber incident. We look forward to the G7 Cyber Expert Group’s assessment of the risks and opportunities that AI presents for cybersecurity.
    4. The potential effects of quantum technologies on the global financial landscape are becoming increasingly visible. Our central banks will explore how we can identify, categorize and mitigate potential risks to data security and financial stability and promote economic resilience.

    Financial Crime Call to Action

    1. We remain steadfast in our commitment to tackling financial crime, including money laundering, terrorist financing and the financing of proliferation of weapons of mass destruction (AML/CFT/CPF). We endorse a “Financial Crime Call to Action” to spur further progress and collective efforts of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) and its Global Network. By bringing together over 200 jurisdictions around the world, the FATF is the ultimate international standard setter, and we welcome its leadership in combatting financial crime since its creation by the G7 in 1989.
    2. Through strengthening our AML/CFT/CPF frameworks and enhanced international cooperation we will endeavor to stay abreast of emerging risks, understand the role of technology and deepen the responsible exchange of information to make it harder for criminals to access the financial system and evade detection.
    3. We recognize financial crime acts as a barrier to growth, development and stability, and support efforts to strengthen frameworks in lower capacity countries. We encourage the international community to join us in this Call to Action and strengthen our collective response to financial crime.

    Support for Developing Countries

    1. We reaffirm our commitment to the ongoing implementation of the World Bank-led Resilient and Inclusive Supply-Chain Enhancement (RISE) Partnership and recognize its progress toward better integrating low- and middle-income countries in the global supply chain of clean energy products, especially in Africa. We welcome the adoption of a country roadmap in Zambia. We encourage the World Bank to further advance this initiative, and we look forward to the launch of the first local and regional information platforms in Africa. We support the expansion of RISE’s activities to Latin America and the Caribbean, and a better integration of all segments of the critical mineral supply chain. We call on Multilateral Development Banks (MDBs) to strengthen collaboration on critical mineral supply chains amongst themselves and with other key stakeholders. We also highlighted linkages to G20 initiatives facilitating private sector development, such as the G20 Compact with Africa.
    2. We recognize that global crises, including health crises and natural disasters, pose significant challenges for all economies, with particularly severe impacts on vulnerable states, including small ones. We reaffirm the importance of strengthening support for these countries by facilitating domestic resource mobilization as well as the use and uptake of crisis preparedness and response tools, including Climate Resilient Debt Clauses and insurance, to help ease fiscal pressures. We encourage the IMF and MDBs to strengthen their focus on crisis prevention in order to reduce the incidence of crises materializing.
    3. We call on the international community to make efforts to support vulnerable countries facing debt challenges. We look forward to the G20 work on improving the implementation of the Common Framework for debt treatments in a predictable, timely, orderly, and coordinated manner. We also agree on the importance of advancing debt transparency to support sound economic governance and financial stability. We call on the international community to make efforts to support vulnerable countries whose debt is sustainable but face near-term liquidity challenges. We recognize the need for continued efforts with all partners, public and private, to enhance the availability and quality of debt data, including through the Data Sharing Exercise with the World Bank.
    4. We reaffirm our commitment to achieving more effective and impactful MDBs through reforms aiming to ensure that they work effectively as a system to address the most pressing global challenges, deliver on their core mandate, and use their resources as efficiently as possible, including by implementing the recommendations from the G20 Capital Adequacy Framework Review. We urge MDBs to continue to step up their efforts to mobilize private capital and enhance domestic resource mobilization in emerging markets and developing countries. We emphasize the importance of implementing quality-based procurement policies and procedures that promote efficiency, competition from the private sector, and transparency.

    G7 Financial Crime Call to Action

    The G7 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors remain steadfast in our commitment to tackling financial crime, including money laundering, terrorist financing and the financing of proliferation of weapons of mass destruction (AML/CFT/CPF).

    In 1989, the G7 created the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) to “prevent the utilization of the banking system and financial institutions for the purpose of money laundering” and was soon joined by many other countries and jurisdictions which shared the same concerns and volunteered for a global effort against financial crime. Since its establishment, the FATF’s mandate and standards have expanded to include the combatting of financing of terrorism and the financing of proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. The transnational nature of money laundering, malicious nature of its predicate crimes, and integrated nature of our economies necessitate a collective approach to combatting illicit finance. 2025 marks the 35-year anniversary of the FATF’s “40 Recommendations”, which were developed collectively by FATF members and are now being implemented in more than 200 jurisdictions worldwide thanks to the joint efforts of the FATF Global Network.

    The Intersection of Crime, Security, and Economic Prosperity

    Organized criminals, including cartels, are exploiting gaps in global AML safeguards to launder the profits of their criminal activities such as drug trafficking (including fentanyl and synthetic opioids), fraud, cybercrimes, and human smuggling that generate billions in illicit revenue annually. These crimes are not only having a devastating impact on our communities, but they are also impacting national security and economic integrity as profits are re-invested into vast criminal networks that seek to undermine the rule of law and destabilize our governments and economies.

    Financial crime is also harming global economic growth. The International Monetary Fund has found that illicit finance reduces productivity, widens inequality, inhibits legitimate investment and hinders an effective allocation of resources. The World Bank has found that financial crimes are a barrier to development sparking political instability, deterring private capital, undermining good governance and the rule of law, and generally eroding trust in governments and institutions. Illicit finance also robs treasuries of badly needed tax revenue at a time when so many economies around the world are facing historically high debt levels.

    The World Bank sees tackling illicit finance in low-capacity countries as vital to their development priorities and requiring sustained engagement. Strengthening AML/CFT/CPF capacity in developing and low-capacity countries would improve financial inclusion and further deprive international organized crime groups of opportunities to launder their illicit proceeds or finance terrorism.

    In this context, technically sound and effective AML/CFT/CPF frameworks contribute to safer communities, our collective security, and to stronger economies in the G7 and around the globe.  

    The Way Forward

    Under the Canadian G7 Presidency, Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors have taken stock of the fight we launched in 1989 and identified areas for further action. Today, we endorse the present Financial Crime Call to Action to strengthen global security, protect financial sector integrity, and foster economic growth and economic development.

    Strengthening our Frameworks

    • We re-commit to the founding principles of the FATF and will continue to actively support the organization.
      • The FATF is the ultimate AML/CFT/CPF standard setter that catalyzes improvements in members’ AML/CFT/CPF regimes. It is essential to maintain the FATF’s role at the centre of the global fight against illicit finance.
      • We commit to ensuring that the FATF remains a technical body that produces in-depth and impartial peer reviews and research that inform our ongoing understanding of risk.
    • We commit to improving the effectiveness of our respective AML/CFT/CPF regimes. The G7 must lead by example.
      • G7 financial systems remain the most interconnected in the world and continue to represent attractive targets for bad actors seeking to launder ill-gotten gains. The G7 will continue to improve our effectiveness in preventing the proceeds of crime from entering our financial sectors, detecting and disrupting money laundering threats, sanctioning criminals and depriving them of their illegitimate proceeds in a manner consistent with our domestic legal frameworks.
      • Shell companies are enablers for criminals to hide proceeds of crime and engage in illicit activities, such as large-scale tax and sanctions evasion. Ensuring that competent authorities, particularly law enforcement, have sufficient resources and tools to investigate and prosecute money laundering, terrorist financing, and proliferation financing involving shell companies is critical to fighting financial crime.
      • The procurement of dual use and military technology through circumvention of sanctions violates United Nations Security Council Resolutions and undermines global security. We commit to enhancing implementation of our targeted financial sanctions and ensuring they are the most effective in the world.

    Enhancing International Cooperation

    • We will stay abreast of emerging risks tied to money laundering, terrorist financing and proliferation financing through research and the development of joint typologies and strategic intelligence.
      • We express our serious concerns that virtual asset thefts and scams, including by the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, have reached unprecedented levels. These threats, as well as the methods used by criminals to launder their proceeds, must be better understood and addressed. This is necessary to raise awareness, enhance prevention, and mitigate money laundering as well as being critical to promoting responsible innovation in virtual assets and protecting virtual asset users in our jurisdictions. We will further research and exchange information such as typology work on emerging risks related to virtual assets, including from the perspectives of cybersecurity and AML/CFT/CPF, and take necessary measures.
      • We recognize that illicit actors will continue to take advantage of jurisdictional differences in approaches to countering sanctions evasion and the financing of proliferation. Therefore, we commit to work together to maintain an up-to-date and common understanding of relevant threats, vulnerabilities, and typologies to prevent and combat complex proliferation financing and sanctions evasion schemes.
    • We must break down silos and deepen the responsible exchange of information internationally to make it harder for criminals to access the financial system and evade detection.
      • Bad actors are exploiting silos within, and across, AML/CFT/CPF regimes to conceal their actions. In response, we will improve risk-based and secure information sharing internationally between our national competent authorities, and domestically amongst the private sector and between public and private sector partners, consistent with our domestic legal frameworks. Facilitating this type of information sharing supports G7 efforts to mitigate the negative impacts of fraud on our businesses and citizens and to combat illicit activities by transnational organized crime groups, including cartels.
      • Many of our financial institutions operate across G7 markets. We will encourage deeper cooperation between our regulators who supervise on a group-wide basis. We commit to ensuring that our AML/CFT/CPF supervision is risk-based, effective and focused on stopping financial crime. We will also ensure that sanctions for non-compliance are proportionate, dissuasive and effective.

    Addressing Financial Crime as a Barrier to Growth and Stability

    • We will support efforts to strengthen AML/CFT/CPF frameworks in lower capacity countries to foster growth and economic development.
      • This can be achieved through many channels, including bilateral and multilateral assistance and collaboration. This work will ensure the G7 together with other FATF members keep pace with evolving regional risks, and support asset recovery to further deprive criminals of illicit proceeds and reduce opportunities for money laundering.
      • The FATF and its Global Network of nine FATF-Style Regional Bodies (FSRBs), which bring together more than 200 jurisdictions and 20 observer international organizations, are at the heart of the global fight against financial crime. We reiterate our commitment to supporting the FSRBs in overseeing the consistent and effective implementation of the FATF standards worldwide, including in the next round of mutual evaluations.
    • We commit to supporting the effective implementation of AML/CFT/CPF measures that are risk-based and proportionate.
      • We recognize that a risk-based approach can promote economic development and financial inclusion by encouraging assessments of risk, identifying lower and higher risk scenarios, and implementing simplified AML/CFT/CPF measures in certain scenarios proportionate to the relevant risks. 
      • By implementing the revised FATF standards, we will facilitate legitimate funds continuing to move through the formal financial sector, promoting economic development and financial inclusion while mitigating unintended consequences.
    • We commit to exploring the role of technology in AML/CFT/CPF implementation.
      • We encourage adoption of new technologies that can more effectively detect, report and interdict illicit finance. This includes partnering with the private sector to understand how emerging technologies (including artificial intelligence) can be used to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of AML/CFT/CPF regimes. This should be consistent with our respective domestic legal frameworks and risk-based, while ensuring data protection and human rights.
      • We continue to support the FATF’s initiatives to accelerate global implementation of its standards on virtual assets and virtual asset service providers (VASPs) as well as its work on emerging risks, including those that arise from misuse of stablecoins and peer-to-peer transactions, offshore VASPs, and decentralized finance (DeFi) arrangements.
      • We are contributing to the FATF’s ongoing work to strengthen its Standards on Payment Transparency to adapt to changes in payment business models and messaging standards and to foster payment systems that are more transparent, inclusive, accessible, safe and secure, while enabling faster and cheaper transactions, including remittances. Consistent with this work, we also support the G20 Roadmap for Enhancing Cross-border Payments.

    Lastly, we commit to furthering this work under the French G7 Presidency in 2026, in coordination with all FATF members, and to report on the actions taken to implement the commitments in this Call to Action.

    We encourage all countries to join us in this Call to Action. The international community can, and must, strengthen our collective response to financial crime and its impact on communities, security, and prosperity.

    MIL OSI Canada News

  • MIL-OSI USA: L3 Technologies Inc. Agrees to Pay $62,000,000 to Resolve False Claims Act Allegations arising from Submission of False Cost or Pricing Data on Defense Contracts

    Source: US Justice – Antitrust Division

    Headline: L3 Technologies Inc. Agrees to Pay $62,000,000 to Resolve False Claims Act Allegations arising from Submission of False Cost or Pricing Data on Defense Contracts

    L3 Technologies Inc., a corporation doing business in Utah, has agreed to pay the United States $62 million to settle allegations that its division, Communications System West, violated the False Claims Act and the Truth In Negotiations Act by knowingly making false statements and submitting and causing the submission of false claims by failing to disclose accurate, current, and complete cost or pricing data for communications equipment sold to various Department of Defense agencies, including the Air Force, Army, and Navy, and other government agencies. 

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Governor Lamont Announces Final Approval of His Plan To Provide Wage Increases for the Connecticut State Police

    Source: US State of Connecticut

    (HARTFORD, CT) – Governor Ned Lamont is applauding the Connecticut State Senate for voting this afternoon in favor of approving an agreement he negotiated with the Connecticut State Police Union that will enact pay increases for the Connecticut State Police.

    The governor and the union reached the agreement in April, and then the governor presented the agreement to the legislature for its approval. Today’s vote by the Senate was the final step necessary in the process of ratifying it.

    “Our Connecticut State Police deserve salaries that reflect the essential work they provide, and I am glad that we were able to reach this agreement to provide these pay increases for our state troopers,” Governor Lamont said. “This wage re-opener follows the pattern established by SEBAC as the final contract to be ratified under this pattern. I want to thank the members of the General Assembly who voted in favor of supporting our state troopers, as well as those who helped negotiate this agreement.”

    The legislation that was approved by the Senate today is Senate Resolution 16. It was approved in that chamber by a vote of 36 to 0. The House of Representatives approved the agreement earlier this week through House Resolution 17 by a vote of 134 to 12.

     

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – The case of Azerbaijani political prisoner Tofig Yagublu – E-001955/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-001955/2025
    to the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy
    Rule 144
    Francisco Assis (S&D)

    Tofig Yagublu, an Azerbaijani political opposition leader, was wrongfully detained in December 2023. In March 2025, he was sentenced to nine years in prison on fabricated charges. On 1 April 2025, Mr Yagublu began a hunger strike, which he pledged to continue until his release. He ended his hunger strike after 40 days at the urging of his family, but it has severely affected his health.

    A long-time critic of Azerbaijan’s Government, Mr Yagublu has repeatedly been persecuted, jailed and subjected to ill-treatment for his political activism. He is one of more than 350 arbitrarily detained individuals in Azerbaijan.

    His health is still in critical condition, and he remains unjustly detained.

    • 1.What steps is the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (VP/HR), Kaja Kallas, taking to raise this case with the Azerbaijani Government, so that Mr Yagublu has continuous access to adequate medical care and is immediately released from detention?
    • 2.How does the VP/HR intend to ensure that progress on the new Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between the EU and Azerbaijan depends on the Azerbaijani Government taking concrete steps to demonstrate its commitment to protecting human rights, including by releasing all arbitrarily detained political prisoners?

    Submitted: 15.5.2025

    Last updated: 22 May 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Follow-up question on self-selection bias in connection with Citizens’ Panels and Youth Policy Dialogues – E-001800/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-001800/2025/rev.1
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Marieke Ehlers (PfE)

    In its answer to question E-002913/2024[1] the Commission goes into the participant selection process, establishing that there is no selection bias. My question is about the people who respond to invitations following the selection process, i.e. self-selection bias. For instance, people with positive views on the EU would be more likely to respond to your randomised invitation to participate in Citizens’ Panels and Youth Policy Dialogues than people with less positive views.

    • 1.How does the Commission verify that the actual group of participants is as randomised as the candidate participants selected by the Commission?
    • 2.Can the Commission explain the role of experts and stakeholders in connection with Citizens’ Panels?
    • 3.Who are those experts and stakeholders?

    Submitted: 3.5.2025

    • [1] https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/E-10-2024-002913-ASW_EN.html.
    Last updated: 22 May 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Security: L3 Technologies Inc. Agrees to Pay $62,000,000 to Resolve False Claims Act Allegations arising from Submission of False Cost or Pricing Data on Defense Contracts

    Source: United States Attorneys General 7

    L3 Technologies Inc., a corporation doing business in Utah, has agreed to pay the United States $62 million to settle allegations that its division, Communications System West, violated the False Claims Act and the Truth In Negotiations Act by knowingly making false statements and submitting and causing the submission of false claims by failing to disclose accurate, current, and complete cost or pricing data for communications equipment sold to various Department of Defense agencies, including the Air Force, Army, and Navy, and other government agencies.

    L3 manufactures communications equipment to operate unmanned vehicles and retrieve data and visuals for military operations and intelligence. The devices are known as remote operations video enhanced receivers (ROVER), Video-Oriented Transceivers for Exchange of Information (VORTEX), and Soldier Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (SIR) receivers.  The United States has purchased ROVER, VORTEX, and SIR products through sole source, fixed price contracts, and L3 also has supplied these products under subcontracts with other prime contractors who manufacture unmanned vehicles.

    The settlement resolves allegations that, between October 2006 and February 2014, L3 failed to disclose accurate, complete, and current cost or pricing data relating to the labor, material, and other costs for manufacturing the ROVER, VORTEX, and SIR products, and each of their versions and kits, and falsely certified that it had done so in dozens of government contract proposals.  The United States alleged that this conduct violated the Truth in Negotiations Act, which requires a contractor to provide to the government at the time of an agreement on price the most current, complete, and accurate facts that could reasonably be expected to affect price negotiations significantly.  The United States further alleged that, by failing to disclose accurate, complete, and current cost or pricing data, L3 knowingly submitted or caused the submission of false claims in connection with the ROVER, VORTEX, and SIR contracts and subcontracts in violation of the False Claims Act.

    “The Department will vigorously pursue federal contractors who fail to provide truthful information during contract negotiations to ensure federal agencies do not overpay for products and services.” said Acting Assistant Attorney General Yaakov M. Roth of the Justice Department’s Civil Division.

    “Taking advantage of the resources that support the armed forces of the United States and other government agencies will not be tolerated,” said Acting United States Attorney Felice John Viti of the District of Utah. “The U.S. Attorney’s Office will continue to work with our law enforcement partners to investigate and hold accountable individuals and contractors who defraud the government.”

    “This $62 million settlement underscores the Air Force Office of Special Investigations (OSI) commitment to protecting national security and ensuring the integrity of Department of Defense acquisitions.,” stated OSI Special Agent Jeffery T.E. Herrin. “L3’s defective pricing in contract proposals for critical systems like ROVER, VORTEX, and SIR erodes public trust, and OSI, through robust law enforcement partnerships, will continue to uphold law and order within the defense industry.”

    “This settlement is the result of a collaborative effort to guard against fraud, waste, and abuse, demonstrating the commitment of the Army Criminal Investigation Division (CID) and our partner agencies to safeguard public funds,” said Special Agent in Charge Olga Morales of the Department of the Army CID Southwest Field Office. “Investigating companies that defraud the Army is crucial to maintaining the trust of the American public and upholding the integrity of government contracting.”

    The settlement resulted from a coordinated effort among the Civil Division’s Fraud Section and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Utah with assistance from the Defense Contract Management Agency, the Department of the Air Force, the Department of the Army, the Department of the Navy, and the Special Operations Command.  Senior Trial Counsel A. Thomas Morris and former Senior Trial Counsel Russell Kinner of the Civil Division’s Commercial Litigation Branch, Fraud Section, and Assistant U.S. Attorney Carra Cadman for the District of Utah handled the matter.

    The claims resolved by the settlement are allegations only and there has been no determination of liability.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Africa: International Islamic Trade Finance Corporation (ITFC) Concludes Successful Participation at the Islamic Development Bank (IsDB) Group Annual Meetings with Nearly US$ 2.6 Billion in Signed Agreements

    Source: Africa Press Organisation – English (2) – Report:

    ALGIERS, Algeria, May 22, 2025/APO Group/ —

    The International Islamic Trade Finance Corporation (ITFC) (www.ITFC-IDB.org), a member of the Islamic Development Bank (IsDB) Group, concluded its participation at the 2025 IsDB Group Annual Meetings in Algiers with a series of impactful achievements that underscore its role as a leading catalyst for trade and economic development in the OIC Member Countries and with the rest of the world. With a total of US$2.6 billion of agreements signed, the Corporation reaffirmed its strong commitment to supporting the socio-economic and development priorities of its member countries. These included sovereign and private sector-focused facilities, new partnerships, and strategic engagements designed to enhance trade resilience, food and energy security, and SME growth. 

    During the meetings, ITFC signed a landmark five-year framework agreement with the Republic of Senegal with total envelope amount of EUR 2 billion to support key sectors such as energy, agriculture, healthcare, and the development of small and medium-sized enterprises. Another key sovereign financing was announced with the Republic of Guinea, to provide a Murabaha trade finance facility through the Central Bank of Guinea to support the import of petroleum products and essential commodities. ITFC signed a US$100 million Murabaha facility with EBID to facilitate imports of essential commodities for private sector clients across Member Countries. Meanwhile, ITFC also renewed its strategic partnership with Afreximbank through a US$300 million Murabaha financing agreement, aimed at securing food and energy supplies and enhancing intra-African trade flows. 

    A strong focus was placed on supporting the private sector and expanding Islamic trade finance tools. ITFC signed US$10 million in Mudaraba financing with Uzbekistan’s Smartbank and signed another agreement with Agrobank to increase the total financing amount to US$ 25 million aimed at providing Shariah-compliant financing to the country’s growing private sector. Furthermore, a EUR 20 million Murabaha facility was signed with Albaraka Türk to boost access to finance for SMEs and private sector clients in Turkiye.  

    Another milestone signing was in favor of Algeria where ITFC signed a US$100 million syndicated LC confirmation facility with Crédit Populaire d’Algérie (CPA) Bank to support trade transactions of both public and private sector clients, with a special emphasis on SME development. Additionally, ITFC inked a EUR 10 million facility with Crédit Communautaire d’Afrique (CCA) Bank in Cameroon, a EUR 10 million facility with Commercial Bank Cameroon, and a US$15 million Murabaha agreement with The Alternative Bank  in Nigeria to support agricultural pre-exports and essential equipment imports. 

    The meetings with Officials and Stakeholders also provided an opportunity to strengthen regional trade development platforms. A grant agreement under the AfTIAS 2.0 program was signed with the government of Algeria to enhance cross-border trade with Tunisia. These partnerships were complemented by ITFC’s hosting of high-level dialogues during the Private Sector Forum, including a panel on trade facilitation and regional integration and a knowledge-sharing event exploring complementarities in trade and economic diversification across the OIC region. 

    The successful conclusion of the 2025 Annual Meetings reflects ITFC’s steadfast commitment to delivering integrated trade solutions that are both impactful and inclusive. By signing close to US$2.6 billion in new financing and partnership agreements, ITFC continues to strengthen its interventions that boost supply chains, promote Islamic finance, unlock new opportunities for sustainable development and improve the wellbeing of the people across its member countries.  

    MIL OSI Africa

  • MIL-OSI USA: 05.22.2025 Sens. Cruz, Luján Introduce Bill to Streamline International Bridge Permits

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Texas Ted Cruz
    WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Sens. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.) introduced the International Bridge and Port of Entry Modernization Act. This legislation expedites the presidential permitting process for all international bridges and land ports of entry. It expands on legislation written and passed into law Senator Cruz’s that streamlined permits for international bridges in Eagle Pass, Laredo, and Brownsville.  
    Sen. Cruz said, “Streamlining the permitting process for bridge infrastructure between Texas and Mexico has been a top priority of mine. This bill builds on and expands our success in securing presidential permits for four major international bridge projects in South Texas by streamlining the approval process for all future international bridges along the Texas–Mexico border. I strongly urge my colleagues to pass this bill so it can be sent to the President for signature.”
    Sen. Luján said, “Ports of entry and international bridges are vital to the economic success of our border communities, supporting trade, business, and tourism. Yet, new border crossings are too often held up by the presidential permit process. I’m proud to introduce bipartisan legislation that will help streamline this process and deliver real investments to Santa Teresa and Sunland Park in New Mexico.”
    This bill was endorsed by the City of Laredo and Texas Association of Business.
    Dr. Victor Treviño, Mayor for the City of Laredo said, “I want to thank Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) for introducing the International Bridge and Port of Entry Modernization Act and Senator Ben Ray Luján (D-NM) for co-leading this legislation. Their bipartisan partnership reflects a strong commitment to strengthening trade along both our southern and northern borders. This bill marks a critical step toward modernizing the development and expansion of cross-border infrastructure by bringing much-needed efficiency and predictability to the presidential permitting process—an essential reform for communities like Laredo, which continues to be on the front lines of international commerce as the #1 Port of Entry in the United States. I urge Congress to pass this legislation and send it to the President for his signature.”
    Glenn Hamer, President and CEO of Texas Association of Business said, “No state is more impacted by international trade than Texas, and our entire business community relies on robust, efficient cross-border commerce to maintain access to global markets – particularly with our top trade partners Mexico and Canada. By making permanent and enhancing the critical, bipartisan reforms to the cross-border infrastructure permitting process that were implemented last year, Senators Cruz and Luján are solidifying the most important trade policy since the negotiation of USMCA. This legislation will be a major win for Texas and the entire country, and we applaud Senator Cruz for his leadership in ensuring the federal government moves at the speed of business to keep the Texas and U.S. economies strong.”
    Read the full text of the bill here.
    BACKGROUND
    Sen. Cruz was the first elected Republican member to be awarded the Key to the City of Laredo for his leadership in streamlining the presidential permitting process and securing permits to build and expand four major international bridges in South Texas, including two in Laredo.
    In October 2024, Sens. Cruz and Cornyn secured a presidential permit for the Laredo 4/5 International Bridge (Bridge 4/5) in Webb County.
    The International Bridge and Port of Entry Modernization Act would:
    Expand the scope to include all international land ports of entry along the U.S.-Mexico and U.S.-Canada borders, rather than being limited to bridges in the original three counties in Texas;
    Add the word “sole” before “basis” to clarify that the State Department should not consider other factors besides America’s foreign policy interest;
    Include language to bar future administrations from considering environmental documents (NEPA) during their decision making.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Murkowski Highlights Opportunities, Challenges with Interior Budget Request

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Alaska Lisa Murkowski
    05.22.25
    Washington, DC – Yesterday, U.S. Senator Lisa Murkowski (R-AK), Chair of the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies, hosted the Secretary of the Interior in subcommittee to discuss the Department’s budget request. The Senator reinforced her appreciation for the administration’s approach to resource development in Alaska, while also addressing staffing concerns, public land sales, and other avenues of potential for the department.
    Watch the Senator’s opening statement here.
    Read the Senator’s full opening statement below.
    FULL TRANSCRIPT
    Senator Murkowski: Good to have you here to discuss the President’s Fiscal Year 2026 Budget Request for the Department of the Interior. I’m pleased to have the opportunity today to talk about the important work that the Department does, including its leading role in supporting America’s energy agenda, empowering Indian country and Tribal nations, providing recreational opportunities to tens of millions of Americans, and generating billions of dollars in economic output.
    It’s been a real pleasure, I have appreciated the meetings that we’ve had, the conversations that we’ve had by phone, and it’s been great to meet the various Assistant Secretary nominees from the Department. I’ve enjoyed our conversations there. I’m impressed by their understanding of the issues that they focus on, and their commitment to public service.
    You’re building out quite the team. It was great to be able to talk to Kate MacGregor. She has a little bit of history with the Department, and comes with a lot of knowledge and understanding, certainly on Alaska–related issues, so we were glad to get her confirmed and to work as well as some of the other nominees. As the Chairman of the Indian Affairs Committee, we’re anxious to have a nominee for the [Assistant Secretary for Indian Affairs] as well.
    So, I want to thank you, I want to thank President Trump for recognizing Alaska’s amazing natural resource potential. This was very significant in the day-one executive order: everything from the Ambler Road to the NPR-A, to non-wilderness Coastal Plain, Alaska
    LNG. There’s been very swift, very early, and decisive action in this space. It’s welcome both here in Washington, DC, and certainly in my state. So, I’m looking forward to working with you to further facilitate the development of Alaska’s resources.
    I know you are looking forward to going to Alaska in just a couple weeks. Hopefully, it’s going to be a great trip, lots of good information, good feedback, and good weather. I’m hopeful that Denali will be out in all of its majesty and splendor and you’ll be reminded why Alaskans prefer the Koyukon-Athabascan name, “Denali,” meaning ‘the Great One.’
    The President and you have set out an ambitious agenda, particularly with respect to the focus on energy and economic development. I’m very supportive of this endeavor, and know that I want to be your partner in achieving so many of the goals.
    Beyond resource development, the Department of the Interior can be an economic force for good in many different ways. One of the most important economic drivers that we see up in Alaska, aside from the resource end of things, within the Department is the National Parks System. The National Parks in the home states of the members on this subcommittee generate a collective $7.4 billion of economic output annually. That’s more than the gross domestic product of 40 different countries. But it’s not just the economic output that makes parks so important, it’s the experiences of traveling to parks, seeing the wildlife, having an adventure that creates a lifetime of memories. And, we’ve had discussions about some of your early years and the significance of that.
    Back home in Alaska, we’ve already had about 150,000 people come through on cruise ships this year. That might not surprise other people, but this is early for us. We estimate a total of 1.65 million visitors for the tourism season – that’s about double the population of our state. So, when we see a skinny budget that proposes to cut $1.2 billion or 35% from the Park Service, it’s hard to square it with the claims that DOI is focused on fostering the American economy, again recognizing that our economy is more than just our natural resource development.
    Another area of concern that I will address in my questions within the National Park Service budget proposal is the concept of turning over management of National Parks to the states. I’m trying to figure out exactly how this would work, and I’m kind of thinking it’s like me putting my kids in charge of the upkeep for the house that I own. In some instances, it might make good sense, but as a wholesale best practice I worry about how that might impact the parks or our people. So, should this concept be included in the full budget request, I’d hope that we have a really thorough conversation with you to better understand the justification for the proposal.
    I am concerned about what the skinny budget proposes for the BIA and the BIE. Cutting nearly $1 billion from Indian Affairs would hurt the federal government’s ability to meet its trust responsibility to Native people. In some of our conversations, I’ve shared some of the areas where I think the Department has failed Indian Country, and this is in areas like probate, where we have an extraordinary backlog, public safety and justice, missing and murdered indigenous people, as well as the education of Native American children.
    While I appreciate that the skinny budget alleges that proposed cuts would enable Tribes to focus on law enforcement, I’m not sure how reducing BIA law enforcement funding by $107 million is treating the program as a core priority of Tribes. I know, because I hear Tribes have been requesting more support for this program to address a serious lack of policing, so I worry that cuts of this magnitude can’t be made up for by directing Tribes to apply for grants at DOJ as the skinny budget suggests.
    I want to end my opening comments this morning by talking about what I consider to be, and I know that you put equal priority to, and that’s the men and women of the Department. The people who actually make things happen.
    We’ve talked about a lot of good ideas for using new systems, IT systems, artificial intelligence, how we can make the Department more efficient. These are good goals, worthy goals, and I hope to see that detailed more in the budget. But I think we know when we’re talking about management of our public lands, if you don’t have the necessary staff, whether out in the field or in the headquarters, all the investments that we want to make become less efficient.
    When I think about the Executive Order as it relates specifically to Alaska, we’ve got some good things that we want to do up north when it comes to resource development, but scientific and ecological assessments that are provided by USGS are relied upon by not just federal land management agencies, but by the industry as well. USGS science helps avoid polar bear dens, identify permafrost, map caribou migration patterns. So, when we see cuts to USGS, but also BLM, BOEM, BSSE, and OSMRE, it causes me to wonder, are we going to be able to accomplish what we’re all seeking to accomplish together?
    I think it’s important also that people have expertise and knowledge about the places that they serve. I had this conversation with folks in the Forest Service. You just can’t take somebody who maybe comes from Indianapolis, a good Forest Service person, but you put them out at the Mendenhall Glacier Visitors Center where their job is bear management and they don’t have a clue about bear management.
    We want to make sure that we’re making good and smart decisions. I know you’re probably going to get a lot of questions today about staffing cuts, and how that is going to impact the operations of the Department not just here in Washington, but around the country. I do wish that the Acting Assistant Secretary for Policy, Management, and Budget, Mr. Hassan, [was] here today to answer some of these questions because he seems to be in charge of making a lot of the decisions about the staffing and the [reorganization]. I’m hoping that he is going to be in a position to be more responsive to my staff about some of the questions that we have raised. But ultimately, and you know, you’ve been a governor you know the buck stops with you. He can be responsible for certain things, but ultimately it is you that is accountable.
    So, getting the answers to questions about the reorganizations, the impacts of RIFs, how the Department will operate National Parks, protect reserves, and implement the President’s energy agenda. Getting this channel of communication going back and forth in a good and a constructive way, I think is going to be important. But, my bottom line to you this morning is [that] I’m I pleased with your nomination, I’m excited that you are there at the Department.
    I’m really excited about the shift that we’re seeing in Alaska where the Department has really gone from being a problem to being a partner in so many different areas. So, [I’m] looking forward to what we’re going to be able to do together.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Kean Applauds Passage of the House Reconciliation Package

    Source: US Representative Tom Kean, Jr. (NJ-07)

    (May 22, 2025) WASHINGTON, D.C. — Today, Congressman Tom Kean, Jr. (NJ-07) released the following statement after the House passed its reconciliation package, a historic piece of legislation that delivers middle-class tax relief, unleashes American energy and innovation, and roots out waste, fraud, and abuse.

    Kean said, “We did it. The House just passed the Reconciliation package, a major step forward that delivers important wins for New Jerseyans and all Americans. I stood up for New Jersey every step of the way, even when it meant standing alone or standing against my own party’s leadership. I led the fight to restore our property tax deduction, and we won. The House bill restores the full SALT deduction for middle-class families, providing up to $40,000 in deductibility.

    “On healthcare, we protected Medicaid for every intended beneficiary in New Jersey and across the country and stopped illegal immigrants from stealing taxpayer-funded benefits. By rooting out waste, fraud, and abuse, we can ensure that this vital program is there for current and future generations of Americans. We also boosted the Child Tax Credit to $2,500, giving young families a much-needed return at a time when they need it most. We secured critical relief for Somerset and Morris Counties and the whole state of New Jersey by providing tens of millions of dollars for local and state law enforcement, ensuring they are supported while protecting President Trump over the next four years. We continued delivering for the American people by voting to secure our borders, unleash American energy and innovation, and invest in national security, all while cutting wasteful spending and making the federal government more efficient, accountable, and effective.

    “This bill lays the foundation for a stronger, more affordable America for middle-class families in the Seventh District, but the fight doesn’t stop here. I will continue advocating for the hardworking taxpayers in New Jersey until this bill reaches the President’s desk.”

     

    Key Wins in the House Reconciliation Package for New Jersey and the Nation:

    • SALT Deduction Raised: Raises the cap on the State and Local Tax deduction to $40,000, providing major relief for all middle-class families.

     

    • Medicaid Integrity Restored: Ensures benefits go only to eligible recipients and that those who are able to contribute to their community are doing so in order to receive Medicaid benefits. Preserves funding for New Jersey’s hospitals, nursing homes, and other providers.

     

    • Secret Service Reimbursement Secured: Secures vital federal support for local and state law-enforcement who provide protection when President Trump is at his home in Bedminster.

     

    • Border Security Strengthened: Provides resources to support border patrol agents, detect illegal drug smuggling, and secure our southern border.

     

    • American Energy Independence Advanced: Unleashes American energy production to help us meet our growing energy needs.

     

    • Child Tax Credit Boosted: Increased to $2,500, offering direct support for families after years of rising costs.

     

    • PBM Reform Achieved: Cracks down on abusive middlemen in the prescription drug market to lower costs for Medicare and consumers.

     

    • “Doc Fix” Enacted: Addresses long-standing Medicare physician payment issues to ensure that New Jersey’s doctors receive fair reimbursement for their important services.

     

    • Orphan Cures Act Passed: Eliminates a misguided law that slowed the development of drugs for patients with rare diseases. Many of these treatments are developed by New Jersey’s unparalleled biotech innovation industry.

     

    • Air Traffic Control Modernized: Delivers a $12.5 billion investment to overhaul, modernize, and staff our air traffic control system.

    ###

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI United Nations: Experts of the Committee on the Rights of the Child Praise Qatar’s Investments in Child Health and Education, Ask about the Age of Criminal Responsibility and Penalties for Child Offenders

    Source: United Nations – Geneva

    The Committee on the Rights of the Child today concluded its consideration of the fifth and sixth combined periodic reports of Qatar under the Convention on the Rights of the Child, with Committee Experts praising the State’s investments in child health and education, and raising questions about its efforts to raise the minimum age of criminal responsibility and prohibit the imposition of harsh penalties, including the death penalty and flagellation, on child offenders aged 16 years and over.

    Aissatou Alassane Sidikou, Committee Expert and Taskforce Coordinator for Qatar, commended Qatar’s efforts to invest in children’s health and education; implement its national development programme, which promoted sustainable development; establish its Ministry of Social Development and Family; and implement the Committee’s recommendations.

    Ms. Sidikou asked whether Qatar’s draft bill on children’s rights would increase the minimum age of criminal responsibility of children, which was currently one of the lowest in the world at seven years, and prohibit imprisonment, flagellation and forced labour for children, which was currently allowed from 16 years of age.  In Qatar, children could be sentenced to death. What measures were in place to strictly prohibit the application of the death penalty on children?

    Rosaria Correa, Committee Expert and Country Taskforce Member, said that despite the recommendations of various human rights mechanisms, the new nationality law did not allow Qatari women married to foreign citizens to pass on their nationality to their children. What steps had been taken to amend this law and other laws to allow Qatari women to pass on their nationality to their children?

    Introducing the report, Ahmad bin Hassan Al-Hammadi, Secretary-General of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Qatar and head of the delegation, said that, over the reporting period, Qatar had worked to strengthen legislative and institutional measures to protect children’s rights in the fields of education, health, social protection and criminal justice. The Qatar National Vision 2030 and the State’s third national development strategy 2024-2030 included key measures addressing children’s rights, and promoted equality and non-discrimination of children.

    The delegation said Qatar had reduced sentences for cases where perpetrators of crimes were children.  Sanctions for children under 16 years did not include corporal punishment or flagellation.  The draft law on the rights of the child would increase the minimum age of criminal liability and define all persons less than 18 years old as children.  It would be adopted and published soon.

    The delegation also said the death penalty could be imposed on children aged 16 to 18, who were more aware of their actions, but judges could commute the sentence, considering the age of the child when the crime was committed.  No one aged 16 to 18 had been sentenced to death in Qatar.

    The Qatari Nationality Code addressed the issue of kinship, the delegation said.  Children of non-Qatari fathers were given the nationality of their father, but such children also had the ability to access Qatari nationality if they had permanent residence.  The State had made great strides in reducing statelessness.

    In closing remarks, Ms. Sidikou said many efforts had been made by the State for children, but challenges remained.  The Committee hoped that the dialogue would help to improve protections for children in Qatar.

    Mr. Al-Hammadi, in concluding remarks, thanked the Committee and all persons who contributed to the constructive dialogue.  Qatar was committed to cooperating with the Committee and to addressing the challenges and risks it faced concerning the rights of the child.  It had achieved great progress in human rights over the years through cooperation with human rights mechanisms.

    Sophie Kiladze, Committee Chair, said in concluding remarks that the information provided by the State party would help the Committee to assess the achievements made by Qatar and the challenges it faced.  The Committee would do its best to develop concluding observations that would strengthen the rights of children in Qatar to the extent possible.

    The delegation of Qatar consisted of representatives from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs; Ministry of Interior; Ministry of Public Health; Ministry of Social Development and Family; Ministry of Education and Higher Education; Ministry of Justice; Supreme Judiciary Council; Public Prosecution; National Group for Protection of Children from Abuse and Violence; and the Permanent Mission of Qatar to the United Nations Office at Geneva.

    The Committee will issue the concluding observations on the report of Qatar at the end of its ninety-ninth session on 30 May. Those, and other documents relating to the Committee’s work, including reports submitted by States parties, will be available on the session’s webpage.  Summaries of the public meetings of the Committee can be found here, while webcasts of the public meetings can be found here.

    The Committee will next meet in public this afternoon at 3 p.m. to consider the combined fifth to seventh periodic reports of Brazil (CRC/C/BRA/5-7).

    Report

    The Committee has before it the fifth and sixth combined periodic reports of Qatar (CRC/C/QAT/5-6).

    Presentation of Report

    AHMAD BIN HASSAN AL-HAMMADI, Secretary-General of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Qatar and head of the delegation, said that Qatar was firmly and permanently committed to the principles of the Convention. Articles 21 and 22 of the Constitution emphasised the role of the family in protecting children from exploitation and neglect, and supporting their development.  The State had worked to strengthen legislative and institutional measures to protect children’s rights in the fields of education, health, social protection and criminal justice.

    The national report was the result of consultation and cooperation between the various national authorities, civil society and children.  The State had made great efforts to address and implement most of the previous recommendations made by the Committee, contributing to tangible progress in ensuring the rights of children.

    The Qatar National Vision 2030 and the State’s third national development strategy 2024-2030 included key measures addressing human rights issues in various fields, including children’s rights, and promoted equality and non-discrimination of children.  Over the reporting period, there had been extensive legislative amendments regarding the protection and promotion of children’s rights, most notably law 22 of 2021 regulating health care services, which included provisions promoting access to health care for all children, and the anti-cybercrime law, which criminalised sexual exploitation.  A draft law on children’s rights was also currently under review; it established effective mechanisms for the protection and development of children’s capacities and promoted the best interests of the child.

    The Ministry of Social Development and Family, established in 2021, was responsible for following up on childhood issues through specialised departments on family development, community welfare, and social protection.  The Qatar Foundation for Social Work had mechanisms for monitoring, follow-up and reporting on protection measures for child victims of violence, as well as awareness campaigns informing children of their rights and methods of reporting and seeking assistance.  The State had also established the National Planning Council, which was responsible for planning and implementing public policies related to children.  The Council of Ministers approved in April 2025 the establishment of the Digital Safety Committee for Children and Young People, and an awareness campaign on the safe use of technology would also be launched in June 2025.

    Efforts had continued to increase the enrolment rates of children, including children with disabilities, in compulsory education.  The overall enrolment rate was more than 97.5 per cent.  The State was encouraging girls to enrol in scientific disciplines; the percentage of girls in these disciplines had reached about 54 per cent at the secondary level.  New schools had also been established to provide technical and specialised education for both boys and girls.  The national education strategy 2024-2030 focused on improving the quality and inclusiveness of education, ensuring equal opportunities and enhancing governance. Five “peace schools” that received children of various nationalities, especially from countries in crisis, including children with disabilities, had been established.

    In the health sector, the national health strategy 2024-2030 was launched, which aimed to promote children’s health by preventing chronic diseases such as obesity and diabetes, and paying attention to oral health.  The State had established a system of child-friendly hospitals and general paediatric clinics.  The national team for child protection from violence and neglect received approximately 500 cases annually of suspected cases of child abuse and implemented preventive measures in response.  Effective countermeasures adopted during the COVID-19 pandemic contributed to Qatar having one of the lowest child mortality rates globally.

    Qatar’s Labour Code protected children from exploitation, prohibited their employment before reaching the legal age, and regulated the types of work that children could not do.  Moreover, the consumer protection law and the food control law promoted children’s rights as vulnerable consumers, while the Ministries of Health and Commerce were closely monitoring to ensure safe and healthy food for children.  The State had also launched plans to reduce and assess environmental pollution, especially in areas near schools and residential areas.

    The State had also paid attention to building the capacity of professionals working with children, such as judges, teachers, doctors and media professionals, through training programmes on the Convention delivered in cooperation with civil society.  Qatar was also studying the possibility of establishing a national children’s parliament and had established interactive platforms that allowed children to express their opinions and suggestions, especially when discussing policies that directly affected their lives.

    To protect children’s rights, Qatar was cooperating with United Nations agencies, including the United Nations Children’s Fund, which opened an office at the United Nations House in Doha in 2022. It was working to protect children in conflict areas in countries such as Syria, Palestine, Yemen, Somalia, Afghanistan, Russia and Ukraine.  The Qatari Education Above All initiative had reached over 17 million children in more than 65 countries.  Qatar had provided humanitarian assistance, including food and health care, to children in Gaza.

    Qatar was fully committed to the implementation of the Convention and its two Optional Protocols, and the protection of children’s rights.  Achieving this goal required continuous reform efforts through measures that kept pace with emerging changes and challenges.

    Questions by Committee Experts 

    AISSATOU ALASSANE SIDIKOU, Committee Expert and Taskforce Coordinator for Qatar, commended Qatar’s efforts to invest in children’s health and education; implement its national development programme, which promoted sustainable development; establish its Ministry on the Rights of Children and Families; and implement the Committee’s recommendations. Why had the State party maintained its reservations to articles two and 14 of the Convention?  The provisions in article two of the Convention were much broader than those of articles 34 and 35 of the Constitution. 

    Why was there was no schedule for adoption of the draft bill on children’s rights, which had been considered by the State for over 15 years?  Would the bill increase the minimum age of criminal responsibility of children, which was currently at seven years, and prohibit imprisonment, flagellation and forced labour for children, which was currently allowed from 16 years of age?  Did the National Human Rights Commission and the National Planning Council have sufficient resources?  How did they coordinate to protect child rights?

    Qatar’s investments in health and education had increased in 2022 and 2024, but these amounts were still below global standards.  Would this be addressed?  Were funds allocated for children in the budget clearly outlined?  How did the State party ensure that resources were equitably assigned?  A national survey conducted in 2023 contained very little information on vulnerable children. What was being done to strengthen data collection on such children?

    Did migrant children have access to mechanisms to report violations of their rights?  How did the State party support access to remedies for child victims? Were there capacity building and awareness raising mechanisms on child rights for State officials, civil society, the media and the public?  Did the National Human Rights Commission’s monitoring mechanism follow up on the implementation of the Convention and receive complaints on violations of the rights of children, including from migrant children?  How did the State party monitor policies and programmes on children’s rights?  Were there regulations that promoted compliance with international standards on children’s rights in the private sector?

    Girls in Qatar continued to face multiple forms of discrimination due to traditional beliefs.  What actions had been taken to change these negative social norms?  Children with disabilities, children with unmarried or foreign parents, and the children of migrant workers were subject to widespread discrimination.  How did the State party ensure that all children had access to basic social services?  Was there a general law prohibiting all forms of discrimination?

    There were no guidelines for professionals on determining the best interests of the child.  Would these be developed?  How did the State party ensure that this principle was applied consistently in all legal procedures?  In Qatar, children could be sentenced to death.  What measures were in place to strictly prohibit the application of the death penalty on children?  How did the State party facilitate the participation of children in matters affecting them?

    Despite the recommendations of various human rights mechanisms, the new nationality law did not allow Qatari women married to foreign citizens to pass on their nationality to their children. What steps had been taken to amend this law and other laws to allow Qatari women to pass on their nationality to their children?

    ROSARIA CORREA, Committee Expert and Taskforce Member, welcomed that the State party had taken several measures to address corporal punishment.  Had it assessed the impact that these measures had had on society? There was no law prohibiting corporal punishment.  What legislative efforts had been made to prohibit corporal punishment in all settings? Had studies into violent disciplining been carried out?  What measures had schools adopted to protect children?  How many child victims of violence had received remedies?  How was the State party monitoring child protection measures?  Did the draft bill on child rights address the child protection system?  Who was responsible for representing minors in the courts?

    How was the State party combatting the sale and trafficking of children domestically and internationally?  What was preventing the State from developing a law to ban child marriages?  How did the electronic monitoring system for convicted children work and how effective was it?  What social and psychological programmes were in place to protect the rights of children in conflict with the law and prevent their stigmatisation?

    TIMOTHY P.T. EKESA, Committee Expert and Taskforce Member, welcomed the data on children with disabilities that the State party had collected in 2016.  There were concerns that the State party did not provide access to mainstream education to all children with disabilities, as many were enrolled in special schools.  Only a small percentage of schools had inclusive education programmes, and a medical model was used to determine whether children with disabilities were enrolled in special schools.  Many children with disabilities remained out of school due to denial of admission or the inability of their families to pay school fees.  Could the State party provide data on the number of children with disabilities enrolled in mainstream education?

    Responses by the Delegation

    The delegation said its reservations to articles two and 14 of the Convention were consistent with Islamic Sharia and public morals.  The draft law on the rights of the child would increase the minimum age of criminal liability.  It would be adopted and published soon.

    In 2016, a programme was set up to investigate cases of violations of children’s rights and provide protection and remedies to victims.  It dealt with between 500 and 600 cases a year, some 30 per cent of which involved violence and negligence.  The programme included awareness raising campaigns on children’s rights and on reporting mistreatment of children.  A confidential hotline had been set up for reporting violence; it received 300 calls a year, 60 per cent of which came from children.  A register for cases of child abuse had recorded some 3,000 cases in recent years, and the Qatari Care Centre had provided psychological care to more than 4,000 children.  A conference on combatting violence against children held in 2020 in Qatar was attended by around 2,000 people.

    Qatar monitored the impact of business activities on children, guided by the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights.  The National Human Rights Committee monitored child labour but had not registered any cases. A regional conference had been held in Qatar that had called on businesses not to violate children’s rights in digital spaces.

    The Ministry of Social Affairs had signed a memorandum of understanding with the National Human Rights Committee on cooperation on protecting children’s rights.  This Committee was made up of eight representatives of civil society and five Government employees.  It reviewed legislation concerning children, visited schools to assess violations of children’s right to education, and conducted yearly awareness raising campaigns on the Convention.

    Qatari law did not permit marriages for boys under the age of 17 and girls under the age of 16.  Marriages under the age of 18 were permitted by judges only when there were exceptional circumstances.  A committee had been set up to review the Family Code; it was considering revising the legal minimum age of marriage.  It was very rare for families to allow their children to marry before the age of 18.

    Some six per cent of the national budget was allocated to education, and some 25 per cent of the Ministry of Social Affairs’ budget was allocated to programmes for children.  The State party had dispersed several million Qatari riyals for supporting vulnerable children and families.  A new centre for orphans was established in 2024.

    The Ministry of Education promoted gender equality at all stages of education.  Enrolment rates for boys and girls were equal at primary and secondary schools, and literacy rates were over 99 per cent in 2023.  The Ministry had launched awareness raising campaigns on human rights and non-discrimination.  Guidance was provided to teachers on preventing discrimination against children.  Qataris and non-Qataris received the same treatment in State schools and hospitals. Employers provided migrant workers with health insurance.

    The Qatari Nationality Code addressed the issue of kinship.  Children of non-Qatari fathers were given the nationality of their father, but such children also had the ability to access Qatari nationality if they had permanent residence.  The State had made great strides in reducing statelessness.

    Qatar had laws that enabled children to receive remedies such as compensation if they were victims of a crime. Specialised courts for crimes committed by children and cases of violence against children had been established, which could conduct hearings online.  There was also a witness protection programme for children. Courts had an interpretation and translation service that supported foreign children.  The State assigned lawyers to persons who could not afford them.

    All schools had student councils that allowed students to express their views on issues such as the environment, culture and education.  Cultural activities were organised for children.  Each school calculated its carbon footprint.

    Articles 21 and 68 of the Constitution incorporated the Convention into the legal order.  The State party had increased penalties for trafficking in persons when the victim was under 18 and reduced sentences for cases where perpetrators of crimes were children.  Sanctions for children under 16 years did not include corporal punishment, flagellation or the death penalty. 

    Articles permitting corporal punishment were removed from legislation after the adoption of the Convention. Persons, including parents, who used corporal punishment were held criminally liable.  Guidelines had been developed for parents on disciplining children without using corporal punishment and a centre that worked to educate parents on protecting children had been set up.  Corporal punishment in schools was banned in the 1990s. Inspectors conducted visits to schools to ensure that the rights of students were not violated. 

    The Prosecutor’s Office stepped in if there were conflicts of interest between parents and children.  Child psychologists were deployed to determine the best interests of the child.  Children’s confidentiality was protected in courts.

    The Ministry of Education attached great importance to inclusive education.  Curricula were adapted for children with disabilities and protocols had been adopted for children with autism.  There were programmes for vocational training for children with disabilities.

    Questions by Committee Experts

    ROSARIA CORREA, Committee Expert and Country Taskforce Member, said that Qatar had a set of measures to combat violence between children in schools.  Were there response measures and a recording mechanism for such violence? Some 83 per cent of children reportedly suffered from some form of harassment in primary school.

    What measures had been taken to ensure children could grow up in a pollution-free environment and access green spaces?  How did education programmes address climate change?  What impact was climate change having on Qatari children and how was the State working to mitigate its effects?  How was the State party encouraging children’s involvement in designing environmental policies?  How did the State party monitor children’s nutrition?

    How did the State party ensure that parents equally shared responsibilities concerning child-rearing? When parents divorced, the mother lost custody of her children in Qatar.  Were women who were victims of sexual exploitation criminalised in the Criminal Code?

    TIMOTHY P.T. EKESA, Committee Expert and Country Taskforce Member, said the national action plan on the inclusion of children with disabilities in schools had commendable objectives, but there was a lack of clarity on measures being implemented to achieve inclusion. Had the plan, which expired in 2023, been renewed?  Were there provisions in draft legislation on persons with disabilities that prohibited discrimination against children with disabilities in education?  The Committee had previously called on the State party to implement a national action plan on human rights education; had this been done?

    The Committee commended the State party’s high quality and widely accessible health care system and the launch of the national health strategy for 2023-2030.  Would children receive targeted attention under the strategy? There were reports of discrimination in access to health centres for non-Qatari citizens.  What measures were in place to address disparities in access to healthcare?  Qatar had one of the highest rates of adolescent obesity in the region.  How was the State party addressing this?  How was it promoting access to mental health for children and adolescents?

    BENOIT VAN KEIRSBILCK, Committee Expert and Country Taskforce Member, said that Qatar had not ratified the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization Convention against Discrimination in Education.  Why was this?  Why did most Qatari families choose private schools, while non-Qataris typically attended public schools?  What was the State party doing to support education costs?  There were schools that supported children who had dropped out of school; how effective were they?  Was there an official sexual and reproductive health education programme in schools? What was being done to promote access to safe and inclusive spaces for play and recreation?

    The Committee was concerned that Qatar continued to detain migrant children and families.  In which detention centres were migrants placed? Were there plans to revise the policy of detaining migrant children?  Most migrant workers in Qatar were men.  Were there plans to revise family reunification rules to make it more accessible for workers with low wages?  Were there plans to regularise the children of migrants born in Qatar?

    Members of the Al-Ghufran clan had been deprived of their nationality many years ago. How many of these people still did not have Qatari nationality, and were there plans to resolve their situation? How did the State party ensure that migrant children could enrol in schools and how did it investigate complaints issued by domestic workers?  How many girls were working as domestic workers?  What programmes were in place that supported children in street situations? What results had been achieved by the law on trafficking in persons?  What measures had been implemented to prevent and prosecute cases of trafficking in children occurring during the 2022 World Cup?

    Qatar had one of the lowest minimum ages of criminal responsibility in the world, at seven years of age, and many legal protections for child offenders only applied for children under age 16.  How many children up to 18 years old were deprived of liberty and in what settings? Were they mixed with adults?  Were children in detention informed about the National Human Rights Committee’s complaints mechanism?  Did the State party intend to ratify the Safe Schools Declaration?

    Responses by the Delegation

    The delegation said corporal punishment against all persons was prohibited, including punishment of persons with disabilities.  There was no dedicated legislation on domestic violence, but there were legislative measures that covered domestic violence, and a court had been set up that specialised in domestic violence and temporary shelters, mandated to protect women and children who were victims of domestic violence.  In 2024, the State party organised workshops training for around 5,000 people on issues such as protecting children from violence and intimidation.  There were around 40,000 confirmed cases of domestic violence between 2024 and 2025.

    Initiatives had been adopted to minimise the impact of climate change on children, including adaption of infrastructure and measures to reduce carbon emissions and increase the use of renewable energy.  The State party had constructed 18 square kilometres of green zones in 2023 and an additional eight in 2024.  There was also a course within the school curriculum that focused on protecting the environment and living sustainably.  Schools celebrated a “sustainability week”.  Qatar had also taken measures to ensure the provision of good quality water.  It periodically monitored water and air quality in schools, kindergartens and public hospitals. 

    Qatar promoted children’s health through various measures.  Nine free health check-ups were provided to children up to age five.  The State party encouraged exclusive breastfeeding up to six months; there had been a sharp increase in breastfeeding rates over the past decade.  The State party had developed programmes to tackle the child obesity rate, which aimed to reduce this rate by 30 per cent by 2030.  School nutrition clinics provided specialised services to prevent childhood obesity and nutritional problems.  A 2022 law governed universal healthcare coverage.

    Sexual and reproductive health education and education on drug addiction were provided in schools from primary level, and there was also teaching on the protection of children from neglect, and online and sexual exploitation.  Children were instructed on how to find psychological assistance, and on alerting authorities about threats.

    Qatar promoted access to a healthy environment for children with disabilities.  It had beaches that had been adapted to ensure accessibility.  Various projects were being developed for children with disabilities up to 2030.  A single database covering all children with disabilities in the education system had been set up.  Qatar had over 5,300 pupils with disabilities in public and private schools.  Some 62 per cent of schools were inclusive. There were specialised training programmes for children with disabilities that supported them to become autonomous.

    Children with disabilities had access to specialised healthcare through 10 healthcare centres tailored to their needs, including four centres for children with autism.  The third national strategy 2024-2030 included measures for improving rehabilitation and diagnosis services for persons with disabilities. Social workers, family and community members were trained to care for children with disabilities and support their inclusion in society. 

    Qatari legislators sought to recognise children with disabilities as having legal capacity on par with others, and to promote their access to work, education and other rights.  The draft disability code had been developed and was now being deliberated by the Government.  Measures to exempt persons with disabilities from certain Government fees were being developed.  Legislators sought to promote access to complaints mechanisms for children with disabilities and their families.  The State funded legal aid services to support children in court, including children with disabilities.

    The draft child code defined all persons less than 18 years old as children.

    As part of the 2024-2030 development strategy, the State party had visited schools and engaged in dialogue with students, parents and teachers.  “Sustainability ambassadors” who promoted environmental protection were appointed in schools, and young people could contribute to the Shura Council. Many children had taken part in drafting the State party’s report.

    The State party was promoting awareness of human rights for children through social education courses and campaigns in schools, through which children learned about the Convention, gender equality, democracy, acceptance of others, cybersecurity, and preventing bullying.  Media campaigns on children’s rights were carried out and manuals and training programmes had been developed to inform teachers, social workers and other public officials about children’s rights.  The State party organised annual events to mark Children’s Day.

    Qatar was committed to protecting school establishments from attack.  It had signed the Safe Schools Declaration and participated in the Education for All initiative.  Qatar helped organise events on 9 September each year at United Nations offices in New York and Geneva to mark the International Day to Protect Education from Attack.

    Public schools applied international standards, including the international baccalaureate programme. Migrant parents could choose the school that their children attended and the language of instruction.  The State ensured the provision of free schooling to students coming from regions of armed conflict.

    Questions by Committee Experts

    BENOIT VAN KEIRSBILCK, Committee Expert and Country Taskforce Member, asked whether police provided sexual education in schools?  Was legal aid free for every child and accessible from the first stage of arrest? Did the State party criminally prosecute children who were addicted to drugs?

    TIMOTHY P.T. EKESA, Committee Expert and Country Taskforce Member, said Qatar generally prohibited abortion, only allowing it in three special cases.  There were severe penalties imposed on women who received unauthorised abortions.  How many unauthorised abortions had the State recorded over the reporting period?

    Another Committee Expert asked about the likelihood of approving the children’s act soon.  Would Qatar provide a complete definition of the child in this legislation?

    A Committee Expert asked about awareness raising campaigns in place to reduce the rate of child deaths from road accidents, which remained quite high in Qatar.  How was wastewater treated and what percentage of the population had access to potable water?

    One Committee Expert asked if Qatari children had access to contraception.  Were children who were the product of rape given Qatari nationality? Did national institutions take a gender specific approach?  Was free legal assistance provided to victims of domestic violence?

    A Committee Expert asked about the level of integration that the State party’s hotline had with law enforcement, health services and social services.  What services were provided to children of adults deprived of liberty, including adults on death row?

    SOPHIE KILADZE, Committee Chair, asked whether the State party had measures to reduce children’s screen time and a policy on artificial intelligence and its effects on children.

    Responses by the Delegation

    The delegation said the 2015 law on the departure of migrants set up a mechanism for entering and exiting Qatar. It regulated the provision of housing, healthcare and education for migrants, as well as the conditions migrants needed to meet to obtain residence permits.  Migrants who did not meet these conditions were deported following the standard procedure.  Persons without identity documents who were accompanied by children, as well as stateless and unaccompanied children, were placed in a shelter while being processed. In 2024, there were 22 such detentions, and thus far there had been six detentions in 2025.  The State party worked with relevant embassies to support processing of these people.

    A directorate had been established that was mandated to prevent road accidents.

    Psychological support was provided to children whose parents had been sentenced to death.  The Criminal Procedural Code provided for two years of reprieve from detention for pregnant women, and when both parents were charged with the same crime, one parent was granted reprieve from detention to care for their children while the other parent was detained.

    The age of criminal liability started from seven years.  From ages seven to 16, judges could only impose sanctions requiring the child’s parents to obey certain commitments or send the child to rehabilitation programmes. The juvenile justice system was based on rehabilitation, not punishment.  Children aged 16 to 18 were more aware of their actions and thus had increased criminal liability.  The death penalty could be used on such children, but judges could commute the sentence, considering the age of the child when the crime was committed.  No one aged 16 to 18 had been sentenced to death in Qatar.

    Qatar had evacuated over 65,000 people from Afghanistan in 2021.  Qatar provided these people with housing and psychological support and facilitated their voluntary travel to other countries.  The State had also evacuated many children from Gaza to Qatar, providing them with free healthcare and education.

    Sexual education was provided by teachers and social workers, not police, in schools.  A national workshop had been set up to develop sexual education; psychologists were involved in this process.

    The State had a legal aid office with attorneys who provided children with free legal assistance and defended them in court.  The office also provided assistance in cases of domestic violence.

    Islamic Sharia was the source of laws in Qatar.  Criminal legislation on abortion was in line with Sharia.  In the State’s view, foetuses had the same rights as adults and benefited from legal protection.  Abortions could only take place if the pregnancy threatened the life of the mother.  Children who were the product of rape could access Qatari nationality.

    Qatar had created legislation combatting cybercrime, which punished all digital intimation and threats.  There were harsher sentences when the victim was a child or had a disability.  The State had also launched a platform that aimed to educate children and families on the safe use of digital technology and build children’s digital skills.  It had a national strategy on artificial intelligence and was committed to developing digital infrastructure that respected human rights. 

    Qatar had acceded to International Labour Organization Conventions 138 and 180 on child labour.  The State’s law on domestic workers protected such workers from exploitation.  The law banned hiring people under 18 years of age for domestic work.  Migrant workers needed to be 18 years of age or older. Domestic workers had the same rights as other workers, including regarding access to healthcare.  There was a Government Department that received complaints from domestic workers, which operated in 11 different languages.

    The State party respected the rights of migrant workers to live with their families.  These workers could bring their children to the State if they fulfilled a strict set of conditions.

    Qatar had criminalised all forms of trafficking of persons, including labour exploitation.  Penalties for trafficking were increased when the victim was a child.  There was a committee within the Ministry of Labour that was responsible for combatting trafficking in persons.  Qatari law was in line with the Optional Protocol on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography.

    The hotline for reporting violations of children’s rights was manned by psychologists, who assessed the urgency of the complaint and referred it to the relevant authorities.

    The Qatar Social Work Foundation worked to enhance family bonds and to prevent domestic violence.  It provided lectures for prospective parents and counselling and mediation services seeking to resolve family problems amicability. The Foundation worked to defend children’s rights in cases of divorce, providing them with psychological counselling. Legislation had been developed that ensured that custody could be provided to mothers in cases of divorce.

    Concluding Remarks 

    AISSATOU ALASSANE SIDIKOU, Committee Expert and Taskforce Coordinator, thanked the delegation for the interesting dialogue.  Many efforts had been made by the State for children, but challenges remained.  The Committee hoped that the dialogue would help to improve protections for children in Qatar.  Ms. Sidikou said she hoped that the members of the State party would carry all children in their hearts in their work.

    AHMAD BIN HASSAN AL-HAMMADI, Secretary-General of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Qatar and head of the delegation, thanked the Committee and all persons who had contributed to the constructive dialogue, which was an important opportunity to promote the rights of the child and global peace.  The State party would use the Committee’s concluding observations to improve measures for children.  The Committee needed to consider the information provided by the State and its cultural specificities.  Qatar was committed to cooperating with the Committee and to addressing the challenges and risks it faced concerning the rights of the child.  It had achieved great progress in human rights over the years through cooperation with human rights mechanisms.

    SOPHIE KILADZE, Committee Chair, said that the information provided by the State party would help the Committee to assess the achievements made by Qatar and the challenges it faced. The Committee respected States’ cultural specificities, but violations of the Convention could not be justified in any circumstances.  The Committee would do its best to develop concluding observations that would strengthen the rights of children in Qatar to the extent possible.  It hoped that the State party would present further progress for children in its next dialogue with the Committee.

    ___________

    Produced by the United Nations Information Service in Geneva for use of the media; 
    not an official record. English and French versions of our releases are different as they are the product of two separate coverage teams that work independently.

     

    CRC25.014E

    MIL OSI United Nations News