Category: Politics

  • MIL-OSI USA: Booker, Kim Statement on Trump Administration Firing First Assistant Desiree Grace

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for New Jersey Cory Booker

    WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, U.S. Senators Cory Booker (D-NJ) and Andy Kim (D-NJ) issued the following statement:

    “Trump’s Department of Justice is once again criticizing a court that acted within its authority, continuing a pattern of publicly undermining judicial decisions and showing disregard for the rule of law and the separation of powers.

    “The firing of a career public servant, lawfully appointed by the court, is another blatant attempt to intimidate anyone that doesn’t agree with them and undermine judicial independence.

    “This Administration may not like the law, but they are not above it.

    “The people of New Jersey deserve a U.S. Attorney who will enforce the law and pursue justice for the people of our state without partisanship or politics.”

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI China: Japanese PM signals intention to resign amid mounting party pressure

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba has conveyed to close aides his intention to step down by August, following the Liberal Democratic Party’s (LDP) internal review of its devastating loss in the recent House of Councillors election, Mainichi newspaper reported on Wednesday.

    Ishiba is expected to meet with senior LDP figures later on Wednesday to discuss his political future.

    Though Ishiba had initially announced his decision to remain in office despite the election setback, calls for his resignation have since intensified within the party, and the exact timing of his departure remains uncertain, according to the report.

    U.S. President Donald Trump said on social media that the U.S. and Japan had made a trade deal that includes a 15 percent tariff that will be levied on U.S. imports from the country.

    Asked about how the trade deal would affect his political future, Ishiba said, “I cannot comment until I thoroughly examine the contents of the agreement.”

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI China: Russia expands entry ban list in response to EU’s new sanctions

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    Russia has substantially expanded its entry ban list of representatives of EU institutions and member states, as well as other European countries, the Russian foreign ministry said Tuesday.

    The list includes members of law enforcement agencies, government and commercial organisations, and citizens of EU member countries and other Western countries responsible for “supplying military aid to Kiev, facilitating deliveries of dual-purpose products to Ukraine, engaging in activities aimed at undermining Russia’s territorial integrity, or organising blockades against Russian vessels and cargo in the Baltic Sea,” said the ministry in a statement in response to the EU’s 17th and 18th packages of sanctions against Russia.

    It includes representatives of EU bodies, national authorities of EU countries and other European states involved in politically motivated prosecution of Russian officials for alleged “illegal detentions and deportations from Ukrainian territory,” those supporting the creation of a so-called “tribunal” against the Russian leadership, and advocates of confiscating Russian state assets or redirecting revenues from them to the benefit of Kiev, it said.

    The list also covers individuals responsible for drafting or enforcing anti-Russia sanctions, those attempting to damage Russia’s relations with other states, outspoken Russophobic activists and representatives of the academic community, as well as EU and European Parliament deputies who have voted for anti-Russia resolutions and draft laws, it added.

    “Further sanctions-related decisions by the EU will also be met with a timely and appropriate response,” said the ministry.

    The Council of the European Union approved the 17th and 18th packages of sanctions on Russia on May 20 and July 18, respectively.

    The 18th package of sanctions blacklisted over 50 individuals and entities. The price cap for Russian oil was reduced from 60 U.S. dollars to 47.6 U.S. dollars per barrel. The EU also banned the import of petroleum products made of Russian oil. 

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: LCQ4: Non-skilled workers employed under government service contracts

    Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

    LCQ4: Non-skilled workers employed under government service contracts 
    Question:
     
    Some members of the property management sector have relayed that quite a number of non-skilled workers employed under government service contracts, particularly those at junior levels such as cleaners and security guards, are paid the statutory minimum wage (SMW) or slightly more than that level. As government service contracts usually last for three years and are on an all-inclusive basis, the change in the SMW rate arrangement to annual reviews may result in government service contractors incurring losses due to repeated upward adjustments to the SMW rate during the contract period. Furthermore, while the Enhanced Supplementary Labour Scheme now allows the importation of labour for the property management sector, it is learnt that the relevant government service contracts do not allow contractors to employ imported labour. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:
     
    (1) of the number of non-skilled workers employed under government service contracts who are currently paid SMW or at a rate that is less than 10 per cent above SMW;
     
    (2) whether it will consider enhancing the pay arrangements for non-skilled workers employed under government service contracts, so that the Government will bear the additional pay costs arising from the upward adjustments to SMW, instead of requiring contractors to “underwrite” relevant policy risks; and
     
    (3) whether it will consider relaxing the restriction that prohibits the employment of labour under government service contracts?
     
    Reply:
     
    President,
     
    Having consulted the Labour and Welfare Bureau and the four major government departments which employ non-skilled workers under service contracts (i.e. the Food and Environmental Hygiene Department, the Leisure and Cultural Services Department, the Government Property Agency and the Housing Department), our reply to the question raised by the Hon Tony Tse is as follows:
     
    (1) The Government has implemented a series of enhancement measures in recent years to protect the remuneration of outsourced non-skilled workers. The service contracts awarded by the four major departments through tendering involve more than 43 000 outsourced non-skilled workers. The median “committed hourly wage” offered by the service contractors to the relevant workers is about $55, which is about 30 per cent higher than the prevailing Statutory Minimum Wage (SMW) rate (i.e. $42.1) and about 8 per cent higher than the median market rate (i.e. $51) of the “Estate management, security and cleaning services” industry covering the group of elementary occupations and service workers in 2024 published by the Census and Statistics Department (C&SD).
     
    Among the some 43 000 workers, about 99 per cent are entitled to a “committed hourly wage” that is at least 10 per cent higher than the SMW rate (i.e. at least $46.3), and the remaining 1 per cent (about 400 workers) are entitled to a “committed hourly wage” that is about 7 per cent higher than the SMW rate on average. As the “committed hourly wage” is the minimum hourly wage that the contractors commit to pay to their non-skilled workers during the tendering process, the actual hourly wage of the workers may be higher than this rate, and the service contractors may increase their wage level during the contract period in light of market conditions.
     
    (2) As mentioned just now, the hourly wage of about 99 per cent of outsourced non-skilled workers under the four major departments is at least 10 per cent higher than the SMW rate. Hence, unless there is a very significant increase in the SMW rate within a short period of time, it is unlikely that government service contractors would have to pay more to their workers solely because of an increase in the SMW. For example, the SMW increased by about 5 per cent from $40 per hour (which took effect two years ago) to $42.1 per hour (effective from May this year).
     
    Under the new “annual review” mechanism, the SMW will be subject to more frequent adjustments than before. However, as the new mechanism adopts a “formula” for adjustment under an open and objective basis, enterprises can make early planning. Therefore, service contractors should be able to make more informed estimates when proposing the “committed hourly wage” in their tender submissions.
     
    The Government has all along required service contractors to provide their employees with remuneration in compliance with the legislation in Hong Kong and employment contracts (including the provision of hourly wage not lower than the SMW rate), which is no different from other employers in Hong Kong. When submitting tenders, service contractors would take into account cost-related factors including material costs, rent, wages, etc., and reflect them in the tender prices as appropriate. As these bidding strategies are commercial decisions, the Government does not plan to subsidise the increased operating costs incurred by the service contractors due to adjustment of SMW rate.
     
    (3) On the premise of ensuring employment priority for local workers, the Government suitably allows employers to apply for importation of workers to replenish the labour force of Hong Kong. The Labour Department (LD) has implemented the Enhanced Supplementary Labour Scheme (ESLS) since September 2023, which allows labour importation for 26 job categories as well as unskilled or low-skilled posts under the Supplementary Labour Scheme for two years. As at end of June this year, the number of cleaners and security guards applied for importation under the ESLS was about 23 000, and about 7 000 workers were approved for importation in total. According to C&SD’s 2024 Annual Earnings and Hours Survey, there were about 190 000 workers in the “Estate management, security and cleaning services” industry covering the group of elementary occupations and service workers. The number of cleaners and security guards approved for importation under the ESLS accounted for less than 4 per cent of the above number.
     
    The remuneration for non-skilled workers under government outsourced service contracts is different from that under the ESLS on various fronts. Specifically, government service contractors must pay non-skilled workers at a rate not lower than the “committed wage” as stipulated in the contracts, while the ESLS requires that imported workers be paid no less than the median monthly wages of local workers in comparable positions. Moreover, requirements on other employment terms are in place under government outsourced service contracts (such as the provision of gratuity and wage arrangement for working when the typhoon signal no. 8 or above is hoisted).
     
    We will maintain communication with LD to keep abreast of the demand and supply of the relevant non-skilled workers in the local labour market (including the situation on labour importation), and explore implementation arrangements to allow importation of labour in government outsourced service contracts upon ascertaining the occurrence of labour shortages under the principle of ensuring employment priority for local workers. The arrangements include addressing the discrepancy between the “committed wage” to be provided by contractors under contract requirements and the wages for imported workers, as well as co-ordinating the monitoring mechanisms across different systems, so as to ensure effective use of public money and proper monitoring of service contractors. We have to reiterate that any arrangement by the Government on importation of labour must be implemented on the premise of ensuring employment priority for local workers. LD will also play a robust gate-keeping role and stringently process each application.
     
    Thank you, President.
    Issued at HKT 13:00

    NNNN

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: LCQ7: Technology and Living curriculum

    Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

    Following is a question by the Hon Dennis Leung and a written reply by the Secretary for Education, Dr Choi Yuk-lin, in the Legislative Council today (July 23):
     
    Question:
     
    The Technology Education Key Learning Area Curriculum was fully implemented at the junior secondary level in the 2016-2017 school year, with “Technology and Living” as one of the covered knowledge contexts. At the junior secondary level, many schools adopt a subject-based learning approach, implementing relevant learning element modules through subjects such as Home Economics. At the senior secondary level, Technology and Living is one of the elective subjects, in which students may choose to study learning strands related to “clothing” (i.e. “Fashion, Clothing and Textiles’) or “food” (i.e. “Food Science and Technology”). These strands serve as a foundation for students’ lifelong learning by providing a range of pathways for students with varying abilities and aptitudes, meeting their needs at different developmental stages and supporting the development of personal interests. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:
     
    (1) of the following information regarding secondary schools in each of the 18 districts across the territory that have offered the subject of Home Economics at the junior secondary level (i.e. Secondary One to Three) over the past three school years: (i) the name, (ii) the financing mode (i.e. government, Direct Subsidy Scheme, private or subsidised) and (iii) the type (i.e. boys’ school, girls’ school, or co-educational school) of the school, (iv) the number of students enrolled in the subject each year (set out by gender), (v) whether the subject of Technology and Living (Fashion, Clothing and Textiles strand) was offered at the senior secondary level, (vi) whether the subject of Technology and Living (Food Science and Technology strand) was offered at the senior secondary level, and (vii) whether the school is equipped with Home Economics room facilities (set out in Table 1);

    Table 1

    District (i) (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) (vi) (vii)
    2022-2023
    school year
    2023-2024
    school year
    2024-2025
    school year
    Male Female Male Female Male Female
                             

     
    (2) of the following information regarding secondary schools in each of the 18 districts across the territory that have offered the subject of Technology and Living (Fashion, Clothing and Textiles) and the subject of Technology and Living (Food Science and Technology) at the senior secondary level (i.e. Secondary Four to Secondary Six) over the past three school years: (i) the name, (ii) the financing mode and (iii) the type of the school as mentioned in (1), (iv) the number of students enrolled in these subjects each year (set out by gender) and (v) the number of students sitting for the Hong Kong Diploma of Secondary Education in these subjects each year (set out by gender) (set out in Table 2);

    Table 2

    District (i) (ii) (iii) (iv) (v)
    2022-2023
    school year
    2023-2024
    school year
    2024-2025
    school year
    2023 2024 2025
    Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female
    Subject of Technology and Living (Fashion, Clothing and Textiles)
                                   
    Subject of Technology and Living (Food Science and Technology)
                                   

     
    (3) of the following information regarding teachers currently teaching the junior secondary Home Economics subject or the senior secondary Technology and Living curriculum across all secondary schools in Hong Kong: (i) the number of teachers, (ii) the median age, (iii) the minimum and (iv) the maximum age, (v) the number of teachers teaching only the junior secondary Home Economics subject, (vi) the number of teachers teaching only senior secondary Technology and Living subject, and (vii) the number of teachers teaching both subjects, with a breakdown by position (i.e. subject panel heads and subject teachers) (set out in Table 3); and
     
    Table 3

    Position (i) …… (vii)
    Subject panel head      
    Subject teacher      

     
    (4) as it is learnt that some schools no longer offer the junior secondary Home Economics subject or the senior secondary Technology and Living curriculum, whether the Government has examined the reasons why some schools have continued to offer such subject or curriculum while other have discontinued them; whether the authorities have other educational resources or programmes in place to encourage students to delve deeper into knowledge related to food or clothing, further consolidate the generic skills they acquired at the junior secondary level, and assist them in constructing new knowledge, thereby nurturing their lifelong learning capabilities; if so, of the specific details, and how schools have responded to such educational resources or programmes; if not, the reasons for that?
     
    Reply:

    President,
     
    Technology Education is one of the eight Key Learning Areas of our school curriculum. It covers six compulsory knowledge contexts, one of which is Technology and Living. Junior secondary students are required to study the learning elements relating to the knowledge context of Technology and Living, while senior secondary students may take Technology and Living as an elective subject.
     
    The reply to the written question raised by the Hon Dennis Leung is as follows:
     
    (1) and (2) While it is compulsory for all students to study the learning content of the knowledge context of Technology and Living at the junior secondary level, schools may implement the curriculum in different modes subject to the needs of their students. The relevant learning content may be presented in the form of a separate subject or covered in different modules, etc. According to the information submitted by schools, there are about 340 schools teaching the knowledge context of Technology and Living as a separate subject with “Home Economics” or “Technology and Living” as the subject name. Some schools adopt a modular approach to teach the learning content of the knowledge context of Technology and Living, promoting and implementing STEAM (science, technology, engineering, arts and mathematics) education through the relevant content, breaking subject boundaries, and expanding learning coverage. To support some schools which are unable to provide all the learning content of the knowledge context of Technology and Living at the junior secondary level, the Arts and Technology Education Centre under the Education Bureau (EDB) offers relevant courses for students to cater for their needs.
     
    At the senior secondary level, students can choose either the “Food Science and Technology (FST)” strand or the “Fashion, Clothing and Textiles (FCT)” strand. According to the Survey on Senior Secondary Subject Information conducted by the EDB in 2022/23 and 2023/24 school years, as well as the 2023 and 2024 Hong Kong Diploma of Secondary Education Examination (HKDSE) entry statistics compiled by the Hong Kong Examinations and Assessment Authority (data of the 2024/25 school year for the above survey and statistics are not available for the time being), the implementation of the subject of Technology and Living in schools is as follows:
     
    Technology and Living (FCT)

    No. of schools offering the subject No. of students studying the subject No. of candidates sitting for the HKDSE
    2022/23 school year 2023/24 school year 2022/23 school year* 2023/24 school year* 2023 HKDSE 2024 HKDSE
    5 5 Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female
    24 116 24 110 6 28 8 37

    *Including Secondary Four to Six students
     
    Technology and Living (FST)

    No. of schools offering the subject No. of students studying the subject No. of candidates sitting for the HKDSE
    2022/23 school year 2023/24 school year 2022/23 school year* 2023/24 school year* 2023 HKDSE 2024 HKDSE
    19 13 Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female
    161 376 148 376 35 118 35 78

    *Including Secondary Four to Six students
     
    The EDB does not have further breakdown of the number of schools in each district offering Home Economics/Technology and Living at the junior secondary level and Technology and Living at the senior secondary level, as mentioned in the question.
     
    (3) According to government statistics, as at September 2024, there are about 440 public sector and Direct Subsidy Scheme secondary schools across the territory with around 430 Home Economics/Technology and Living teachers aged 21 to 66, with the median age of 46. Regarding the number of teachers who only teach in junior/senior secondary level, and those who teach in both junior and senior secondary levels, the EDB does not maintain such data.
     
    (4) Regarding the implementation of the knowledge context of Technology and Living in Technology Education, schools may adopt different modes of implementing the curriculum at the junior secondary level and decide whether to offer Technology and Living at the senior secondary level, having regard to the school missions and objectives, the expertise of staff, as well as the background and learning needs of their students.
     
    In addition to senior secondary Technology and Living, the senior secondary curriculum includes around 60 Applied Learning courses, many of which are related to Technology Education, such as Fashion Image Design, Pâtisserie and Café Operations, Western Cuisine, Food Technology and Nutrition, providing students with more diversified choices.
     
    The EDB provides professional training including seminars, workshops and online training for teachers teaching the knowledge context of Technology and Living every year. A total of 17 relevant training programmes have been offered in the 2024/25 school year to strengthen teachers’ capability in curriculum planning and implementation. Meanwhile, the EDB promotes peer exchange through professional community activities and focus group discussions, thereby enhancing teachers’ teaching capacity. The EDB also co-operates with tertiary institutions and professional bodies/organisations, including the Chinese Culinary Institute, to provide teachers with the opportunity to practise and experience, with a view to boosting their creativity and enhancing their teaching effectiveness.
     
    In addition, a relevant project with the theme of “Developing School-based Secondary School Home Economics and Technology and Living Curriculum” has been launched this school year (2024/25) under the Quality Education Fund Thematic Networks. With a duration of three school years, the project aims to enhance teachers’ strategies in teaching the element of fashion design, and assist schools in developing an innovative school-based curriculum that caters for the needs of students, so as to optimise its implementation and facilitate professional development of teachers. Student competitions and exhibitions are also organised in the current school year to showcase the learning outcomes of students, and have received positive feedback from the public.
     
    Regarding learning and teaching resources, the EDB continues to update the resources related to the knowledge context of Technology and Living, such as Basic Food Science, Fashion Design Basics and Image Building, to provide content for teachers’ reference, with a view to extending students’ learning, enhancing their exploration abilities and strengthening their generic skills. The EDB also publishes the “Technology and Living Newsletter” (www.edb.gov.hk/en/tl/leaflets) and produces video clips annually to provide teachers and students with relevant information on further studies and employment.
     
    On the other hand, the EDB reviews on an ongoing basis the learning elements of the knowledge context of Technology and Living, such as strengthening the application of innovation and technology and the learning element of sustainable development in the curriculum. The EDB also promotes professional training for teachers through collaboration with different stakeholders in order to meet students’ learning needs.

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: LCQ21: Schemes for attracting talents and capital to Hong Kong

    Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

         Following is a question by the Hon Elizabeth Quat and a written reply by the Secretary for Labour and Welfare, Mr Chris Sun, in the Legislative Council today (July 23):
     
    Question:
     
         At present, there are nine schemes mainly for attracting talents and capital to Hong Kong, including the Top Talent Pass Scheme (TTPS), the General Employment Policy (GEP), the Admission Scheme for Mainland Talents and Professionals (ASMTP), the Quality Migrant Admission Scheme, the Immigration Arrangements for Non-local Graduates, the Admission Scheme for the Second Generation of Chinese Hong Kong Permanent Residents, the New Capital Investment Entrant Scheme, the Technology Talent Admission Scheme and the Vocational Professionals Admission Scheme (such talent admission schemes). In addition, the Immigration Facilitation Scheme for Visitors Participating in Short-term Activities in Designated Sectors (the STV Scheme) was introduced on June 1 last year to provide immigration facilitation to visitors invited/sponsored by authorised host organisations for undertaking specified short-term activities which are beneficial to the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council:
     
    (1) of the respective numbers of applications received and approved by the authorities under such talent admission schemes from June to last month, as well as the respective incomes involved;

    (2) of the distribution of the regions or countries of applicants admitted to Hong Kong each year since the implementation of the TTPS;

    (3) among applicants admitted to Hong Kong through such talent admission schemes in each of the past three years, of the respective numbers of those who were engaged in the area of innovation and technology, with a breakdown by such talent admission schemes;

    (4) of the respective numbers of persons who were approved to take up short-term employment in Hong Kong through the GEP and the ASMTP in each of the past five years, as well as the respective distribution of their industries/sectors; apart from these two schemes, whether the Government will explore the introduction of other measures or schemes to enable non-Hong Kong residents to apply for short-term employment in Hong Kong (i.e. the limit of stay is not more than 180 days);

    (5) of the respective numbers of applicants admitted to Hong Kong since the implementation of the STV Scheme, the distribution of their regions or countries and their designated sectors;

    (6) whether the authorities have plans to expand the list of authorised host organisations and/or designated sectors under the STV Scheme; if so, of the details; if not, the reasons for that; and

    (7) as it is learnt that the introduction of a series of new policies by the United States (US) Government in recent years, including tightening the visa regime and substantially reducing research funding, has led to a large number of local scientific researchers (especially Chinese scientists) considering leaving the US, of the Government’s measures (including whether it will introduce targeted talent admission schemes or measures) to support local universities in striving to attract such top-notch overseas scientists to Hong Kong for development?

    Reply:
     
    President,
     
         The Government has been implementing various admission schemes to attract talents and capital investors, actively trawling for professionals, entrepreneurs and individuals with substantial assets. This is to enrich the local talent pool and bring in more new capital to Hong Kong, so as to enhance Hong Kong’s overall competitiveness, and promote the diversified and innovative development of the local economy.
     
         Our reply to the Member’s question, in consultation with the Security Bureau (SB), the Education Bureau (EDB), the Innovation, Technology and Industry Bureau, the Financial Services and the Treasury Bureau, and the Immigration Department (ImmD), is as follows:

    (1) Since June 1 last year and up to end-June this year, more than 190 000 applications were received under the Top Talent Pass Scheme (TTPS), the General Employment Policy (GEP), the Admission Scheme for Mainland Talents and Professionals (ASMTP), the Quality Migrant Admission Scheme (QMAS), the Immigration Arrangements for Non-local Graduates, the Admission Scheme for the Second Generation of Chinese Hong Kong Permanent Residents, and the Technology Talent Admission Scheme (TechTAS). Among them, nearly 140 000 applications were approved. A breakdown of the relevant statistics is at Annex 1. The Vocational Professionals Admission Scheme will only begin to accept applications from mid-2026 onwards upon graduation of the first batch of students from eligible full-time Higher Diploma programmes.

         Under the New Capital Investment Entrant Scheme (New CIES), Invest Hong Kong is responsible for assessing whether the applications fulfil the relevant financial requirements, and the ImmD is responsible for assessing the applications for visa/entry permit, extension of stay and unconditional stay. From June 1 last year to end-June this year, the ImmD received a total of 1 295 applications under the New CIES, of which 673 were approved. The ImmD does not maintain the statistics on the income generated from applications and visa fees under various schemes mentioned in the question.

    (2) The TTPS, which aims to attract individuals with high-income or bachelor’s degree graduates from top universities, has received enthusiastic responses since its launch in end-2022. As at end-June this year, about 135 000 applications were received, of which nearly 109 000 were approved. About 40 per cent (about 32 000) applicants in Categories B and C graduated from bachelor’s degree programmes offered by top overseas universities. The breakdown of the numbers of the applications approved under the TTPS by regions of the applicants and the eligible universities from which they graduated is at Annex 2.

    (3) In the past three years, among the around 76 000 and 57 000 applications approved under the GEP and the ASMTP respectively, the numbers of approved applicants working in innovation and technology (I&T) related fields are 1 654 and 4 006 respectively. Under the QMAS, among the around 27 000 approved cases which successfully passed the selection exercise in the past three years, 8 021 applicants were in I&T-related fields. As for the TechTAS, which aims to attract technology talents to come to undertake research and development work in Hong Kong, a total of 334 applicants were approved in the past three years, all working in the I&T field.

         Regarding the TTPS, the ImmD adjusted the application procedures on March 1, 2023, requiring applicants with work experience to declare the sectors of their occupations. From March 2023 to end-June this year, 26 211 applicants out of nearly 100 000 approved applications declared that their previous occupations were in I&T-related fields.

         For other talent admission schemes referred to in the question, applicants are not required to have secured offers of employment in Hong Kong upon application, nor are they required during the validity period of the first visas to notify the ImmD after they are employed or have established/joined in business in Hong Kong. Given the nature of the scheme, the New CIES does not require applicants to declare their occupational backgrounds. The ImmD does not maintain the statistics on the industries engaged by successful applicants under other schemes when they first arrived in Hong Kong.

    (4) In the past five years, over 112 000 applications were received under the GEP with over 103 000 approved. Of which, about 63 000 concerned short-term positions with contract duration of less than 12 months. The ASMTP received nearly 88 000 applications in the past five years. Of which, more than 77 000 were approved, and about 31 000 applications concerned short-term positions. The breakdown of the numbers of cases approved for short-term positions under the two schemes by industry/sector are at Annex 3.

         Enterprises with job vacancies and facing difficulties to fill the vacancies in local recruitment may apply under the above two employment-tied schemes to employ outside talents with special skills, knowledge or experience not readily available in Hong Kong to take up short-term or long-term employment in Hong Kong.

         With a view to facilitating business, promoting the development of the relevant sectors and raising Hong Kong’s international profile, the Government also launched the Pilot Scheme on Immigration Facilitation for Visitors Participating in Short-term Activities in Designated Sectors (Pilot Scheme) in June 2022, and regularised the Pilot Scheme to the Immigration Facilitation Scheme for Visitors Participating in Short-term Activities in Designated Sectors (STV Scheme) in June 2024. Under the Pilot Scheme/STV Scheme, organisations authorised by the relevant government bureaux or departments can issue invitation letters to relevant non-local talents in their sectors. Invited persons may come to Hong Kong to participate in specified short-term activities as visitors without the need to apply for employment visas or entry permits from the ImmD. They may participate in the specified short-term activities for up to 14 consecutive calendar days during each trip to Hong Kong, and receive remuneration for the specified activities concerned.

         The above schemes have already met the needs of local enterprises in recruiting outside talents to take up short-term employment in Hong Kong. There is no plan now to introduce more measures or schemes for non-local residents to apply for short-term positions in Hong Kong.

    (5) and (6) At present, the STV Scheme covers 12 sectors with a total of some 400 authorised organisations. As of end-March 2025, the Pilot Scheme/STV Scheme had benefited a total of nearly 34 000 non-local talents, facilitating their entry into Hong Kong as visitors to participate in various short-term events and activities. The statistics by sector and the beneficiaries’ place of origin are at Annex 4.

         The SB indicates that to ensure the scheme keeping pace with the times, the Government reviews the coverage of the Pilot Scheme/STV Scheme from time to time, with a view to ensuring that it can continue to effectively achieve the relevant policy objectives. Since the launch of the Pilot Scheme, the Government expanded the scheme twice in February 2023 and June 2024, by adding two new sectors, namely “Finance” and “Development and Construction”, to the original 10 designated sectors, with the addition of authorised organisations to over 400 at present. The Government will continue to monitor the implementation of the STV Scheme and the views of relevant departments and the sectors, as well as to review the coverage of the STV Scheme in a timely manner.

    (7) In the light of the changes in the global higher education landscape, the EDB has promptly called on all universities in Hong Kong to introduce facilitation measures for affected students and scholars with a view to safeguarding their legitimate rights and interests. As for the affected researchers, the EDB has all along been encouraging various institutions to attract top-notch talents in accordance with their diversified talent policies. The EDB is pleased to see that the local universities have been responding proactively and closely monitoring the situation, and have fully utilised the Government’s facilitation initiatives that support the capacity expansion and quality enhancement of post-secondary institutions in Hong Kong. The Government will continue to keep an eye on the development and, having regard to their needs, consider support measures in a holistic approach, including gradually increasing the number of places under the Hong Kong PhD Fellowship Scheme to attract more top scholars to Hong Kong, so as to give full play to Hong Kong’s role as an international post-secondary education hub.

         Meanwhile, the Government is committed to promoting Hong Kong’s development into an international I&T centre and has been adopting a multi-pronged approach in providing more quality employment and development opportunities to pool together global I&T talents. For instance, the InnoHK Research Clusters (InnoHK) have pooled together about 2 500 researchers locally and from all over the world. The Government is taking forward the establishment of the third InnoHK research cluster, SEAM@InnoHK, focusing on sustainable development, energy, advanced manufacturing and materials, which is expected to bring in more talents.

         Besides, the Government has secured funding approval from the Legislative Council in May 2025 for the establishment of the $3 billion Frontier Technology Research Support Scheme (FTRSS), which is aimed at supporting, through matching funds, the eight universities funded by the University Grants Committee to attract international top-notch researchers for conducting research projects on frontier technology in Hong Kong and enhance basic research facilities. It is the plan to launch the FTRSS in September 2025. The Government has also set aside $6 billion to support local universities to set up Life and Health Technology Research Institute(s) to foster multi-disciplinary co-operation among universities/research institutions from Hong Kong, the Mainland and overseas, and attract top-notch scholars and scientists to Hong Kong.

         At present, top international scholars, scientists and researchers can apply for entry into Hong Kong under suitable talent admission schemes according to their own circumstances. There is no need to set up a separate talent admission scheme. If meeting the relevant professional qualifications in the Talent List, they can also enjoy immigration facilitation when applying for entry into Hong Kong under the relevant schemes. Among the various schemes, the TechTAS specifically targets the admission of non-local technology talents to Hong Kong for research and development work, and processes applications from eligible companies expeditiously.

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Transcript – ABC News Breakfast with James Glenday

    Source: Murray Darling Basin Authority

    JAMES GLENDAY: Next, we take you to Canberra and bring in the Federal Education Minister, Jason Clare, who is of course at Parliament House. He has a very big day. Responsible for a couple of key bits of legislation. Minister, welcome back to News Breakfast. 

    JASON CLARE, MINISTER FOR EDUCATION: Thanks, mate. Good morning. 

    GLENDAY: We’ve got a lot of policy to discuss, but I just wanted to ask you for your reflection first of all. What was it like going into Parliament yesterday and seeing the scale of your victory, all of those Labor MPs spilling out right to the other side of the chamber? 

    CLARE: Well, I guess it reminded me of the responsibility we’ve got. The Australian people have entrusted us with government and a very large majority. We’ve got a responsibility to be worthy of that trust and to pay that back with responsible government. And that’s what we’re determined to do. 

    GLENDAY: I couldn’t help but notice that the two women who beat both Peter Dutton and Adam Bandt got to deliver their maiden speeches first. They were lovely speeches. Watched them last night. Quite moving. Were the order of these speeches meant to send a bit of a message to your political opponents? If you get in our way, this is what could happen to you? 

    CLARE: No, but, I think the personal stories of both of those women are incredible. I should have brought a box of tissues to listen to Ali and tell the story of not just the accident that took her leg, but the tragedy that took her son. They are extraordinary women who make a very, very big contribution in this Parliament. I’m looking forward to working with them. 

    GLENDAY: Alright, let’s get to policy. I mean, they were very moving speeches. Anyone who hasn’t seen them is worth just reflecting on them. It looked as though during the election the Coalition was going to oppose your student debt reduction bill. Seems like they’ve had a change of heart. Have they pledged to wave that through? 

    CLARE: Well, not yet, but I hope they do. You know, this was one of the big promises that we made in the election campaign, that we would cut the student debt of 3 million Australians by 20 per cent. And this will take a weight off the shoulders of a lot of young people right across the country. In particular at elections, young people don’t often see themselves on the ballot paper, but they did at this election and they voted for it in their millions. For the average person with a student debt today, this will cut their debt by about five and a half grand. So, there’s a lot at stake here and I’m hoping that politicians right across the Parliament will vote for this legislation. 

    GLENDAY: Do you have a date? You hope it’s in place? Some of those young people have been getting in touch saying, hey, it’s gone up because of indexation and I haven’t seen this cut yet, but of course it’s not law yet. 

    CLARE: Yeah, really good question. Thanks for that, mate. So, when the legislation passes, the impact of it will be to backdate that cut to 1 June this year before indexation happened. That will make sure that people get the maximum benefit of the 20 per cent cut, so that the 20 per cent cut is made on what your debt was on the 1st of June before indexation happened. So, first we have to get the legislation through, then the tax office will have to go through the process of cutting the debt based on what your debt was back on the 1st of June. But you won’t have to do anything. This will all happen automatically at the Tax Office and you’ll get a text message when it happens to tell you that that debt’s been cut. 

    GLENDAY: There you go. So, sit tight. Though we do appreciate the emails we’ve been getting. A trickier issue for you is going to be child safety, in particular, child care, because you don’t control all the levers. You’ve got this Bill to terminate subsidies to child care operators doing the wrong thing. First of all, do you expect the Opposition is going to let that sail through as well? 

    CLARE: Well, we’ve been working really professionally and constructively with the Opposition and I do want to thank Sussan Ley, the Opposition Leader, and Jonno Duniam, the Shadow Minister, for the constructive way in which we’ve been working with them. We’ve also briefed the Greens. This is too important for politics. Parents across the country aren’t interested in us fighting about this. They’re not interested in excuses. They just want action. And this legislation is one part of it. I think all Australians have been sickened and appalled by the evidence coming out of Victoria. We need to do everything that we can to rebuild faith and trust in a system that parents need and rely upon. Right across the country, there’ll be parents packing bags and getting kids ready for early education and care right now. What this legislation will do is give us the power to cut funding to child care centres that aren’t up to scratch, that aren’t meeting the sort of minimum standards that parents expect and that our kids deserve. In a sense, it’s the biggest weapon that we’ve got to wield here because taxpayers provide about $16 billion to child care centres every year. That represents about 70 per cent of the funding to run a centre, you know, pays the rent, pays the bills, pays the salaries. So, they can’t operate without them. If centres are repeatedly not meeting that standard, I think most mums and dads watching will think it’s fair that we should have the power to cut that funding off to make sure that kids are safe. 

    GLENDAY: Sussan Ley will be along in a minute. We can ask her as well. I just wanted to know, have you worked out what the threshold for intervention is going to be? Is it going to be 1, 2, 3 strikes for a centre and then you strip the money? 

    CLARE: Well, it could be as simple as one. It’s important to make the point that regulators have the power to shut a centre right now if they think there’s a serious threat to children’s safety. But this will also give us the power to issue a show cause notice to a centre to say that we’ll shut it within 28 days unless they meet that minimum standard or to set conditions on them as well. And we’ll work closely with the state regulators who do the work in checking centres to identify the centres that should be the subject of this legislation first, the ones that are repeatedly failing to meet those minimum standards. And I’ve got to tell you, that work is happening right now with my department and state regulators across the country. 

    GLENDAY: Yeah. So, just before I let you go, next month, you can have a big meeting with states and territories. Advocates in this sector say a huge problem is that states and territories and the Commonwealth don’t talk to each other. Are we going to see concrete action on things like security cameras, better safety checks, maybe a national worker register for child care operators and workers? 

    CLARE: Yeah. This legislation is just one part of the things that we need to do. We’ll be talking at that meeting about a national educator register so we can track workers from centre to centre as well as from state to state. I think what’s happening in Victoria shows the weakness in that area, but also the role that CCTV can play in deterring bad people from doing bad things and help police with investigations and perhaps most important of all, mandatory child safety training. So, for the 99.9 per cent of workers in our centres who are good people, who care for our kids, you know, whose reputation has been tarnished by what’s happening at the moment, who are in the media for all the wrong reasons, to give them the skills that they need to identify people that might be up to no good, who might be trying to target our kids or to try and distract them from the work that they’re doing to keep our kids safe. 

    GLENDAY: Alright, Jason Clare the Education Minister, you’ve got a lot on your plate. We do appreciate you making time for us on News Breakfast this morning.  
     

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Second Reading Speech – Universities Accord (cutting student debt by 20%) Bill 2025

    Source: Murray Darling Basin Authority

    It is a privilege to introduce the Universities Accord (Cutting Student Debt by 20%) Bill.

    As promised, this is the very first bill to be introduced to the Parliament after the election. 

    And as promised, it cuts the student debt of three million Australians by 20 percent. 

    Mr Speaker, on the 3rd of May Australians made their voices heard. 

    They voted for the tax cuts we are delivering.

    They voted for free TAFE that we are making permanent.

    They voted for us to build more homes.

    They voted for us to roll out more Medicare Urgent Care Clinics.

    They voted for cheaper medicine. 

    They voted for the biggest investment in Medicare ever, to make it easier to see a doctor for free than ever before. 

    And they voted for this. 

    Cutting the student debt of three million Australians by 20 percent. 

    Most of those are young Australians. 

    Just out of uni. Just out of TAFE. 

    Just out of home. Just getting started. 

    Trying to save to buy a home. 

    Thinking about starting a family. 

    Nurses. Teachers. Tradies. 

    Doctors and Paramedics.

    Engineers. Architects.

    IT workers. AI Experts.

    These are the Australians who will build Australia’s future. 

    Who are already building it. 

    And this will take a weight off their back. 

    The average HELP debt today is about $27,600.

    When this legislation passes it will cut that debt by about $5,520.

    If you have got a debt of $50,000 it will cut it by $10,000. 

    All up it will cut student debt by over $16 billion.

    When this legislation passes your debt will be cut by 20 per cent, based on what it was on 1 June this year, before this year’s indexation occurred.

    That will make sure you get the maximum benefit possible and that we honour our promise in full.

    And it will all happen automatically.

    The Australian Tax Office will process changes at their end. 

    You won’t have to do a thing.

    It will take a bit of time for the Tax Office to do this work. 

    But once this Bill is passed the cut is guaranteed. 

    Mr Speaker, this is a big deal for everyone with a student debt today.

    Three million Australians.

    But it’s not the only thing this Bill does.

    It also makes important structural changes to the way the repayment system works.

    To make it fairer.

    And to help with the cost of living.

    This Bill raises the minimum amount you have to earn before you have to start making repayments – from $54,435 in 2024-25 to $67,000 in 2025-26.

    And it reduces the minimum repayments you have to make.

    For someone earning $70,000 it will reduce the minimum repayments they have to make by $1,300 a year.

    That’s real cost of living help.

    More money in your pocket – not the government’s.

    When you really need it.

    This is an important structural reform.

    We are replacing the current repayment system with a new marginal repayment system.

    At the moment the amount that you pay off every year is based on your entire wage.

    That means once you earn above the current minimum repayment threshold of $54,435, you pay a percentage of your entire wage as a repayment.

    Under the changes in this Bill, you will only pay a percentage of your wage above the minimum repayment threshold.

    So, for example, if you earn $70,000 at the moment you currently have to repay $1,750 each year.

    Under these changes you will only have to repay about $450.

    In other words, if you earn $70,000 a year, you will have to repay $1,300 less a year than you currently have to.

    If you earn $80,000 a year, you will have to repay $850 less a year than you currently have to.

    And if you earn $110,000 a year, you will have to repay $700 less a year than you currently have to.

    You can still pay off more if you want to.

    But what this does is make the system fairer.

    It means you start paying off your uni degree when university starts to pay off for you.

    It’s a recommendation of the Universities Accord.

    And it’s a recommendation of the architect of HECS, Professor Bruce Chapman.

    When we announced this reform to create a marginal repayment system, Professor Chapman said this is:

    “…the most important thing that’s happened to the system in 35 years. It’s a marginal collection, it’s much gentler and much fairer than previously — we should have done it years ago.”

    Mr Speaker, these are important reforms, that will help millions of Australians, now and into the future. 

    It’s why it is the first Bill that we have introduced to this new Parliament.

    As the Prime Minister said when he announced in November last year that we would cut student debt by 20 per cent and make these structural changes:

    “It helps everyone repaying a student debt right now – and it delivers a better deal for every student in the years ahead.

    Permanent, structural reform to boost take home pay for young Australians.

    This is about putting money back into your pocket – and putting intergenerational equity back into the system.

    Good for cost of living.

    Good for this generation – and for generations to come.

    Good for building Australia’s future.”

    Mr Speaker, not surprisingly, the Coalition immediately said that they would oppose this Bill. 

    Like everything else, their immediate reaction was to attack this.

    I suspect they now rue that decision.

    They called it “terrible”. They called it “unfair”.

    In the electorates they represented, people saw something different.

    In electorates right across the country, where 1 in 4 voters have a student debt, they saw an opportunity to get a load off their back.

    To make their life a little bit easier.

    And they voted for it.

    As one anonymous National Party MP told the Daily Telegraph after the election:

    “My kids are paying off a university debt and I reckon they voted for Labor”.

    Mr Speaker, when even your own family won’t vote for you, you know you’ve got it wrong.

    Now the Opposition have a chance to get this right.

    Not just by voting for it.

    But by actually speaking in support of it.

    This is a chance for the opposition to admit they got it wrong.

    And that the Australian people got it right.

    Education is the most powerful cause for good.

    A good education changes lives.

    A good education system changes countries.

    It’s changed ours.

    We have got a good education system in Australia today.

    But the truth is it can be better and fairer.

    This Bill is part of that.

    So is Paid Prac that started this month for teaching and nursing students.

    For midwifery students and social work students.

    So are the University Study Hubs that will open up in our outer suburbs and regions over the next few months.

    And so is the new Needs-based Funding system for our universities that starts next year.

    It is also what the agreements we have signed with every State and Territory to fix the funding of our public schools are all about.

    And tying that funding to real reform to help kids who start behind or fall behind to catch up and keep up, and help more kids finish school and then go on to TAFE or University.

    It also means making our child care centres safer.

    And I will introduce legislation to help do that in a few moments time.

    Mr Speaker, once again, it’s my privilege to make good on a promise we made last year and that we repeated every single day of the election campaign. 

    In every seat across the country.

    To cut student debt by 20 per cent.

    To cut the debt of 3 million Australians.

    To take a weight off their back.

    To help with the cost of living.

    And to help build Australia’s future.

    I commend this Bill to the House.

    MIL OSI News

  • Trump pulls US out of UN cultural agency UNESCO for second time

    Source: Government of India

    Source: Government of India (4)

    President Donald Trump has decided to pull the United States out of the “woke” and “divisive” U.N. culture and education agency UNESCO, the White House said on Tuesday, repeating a move he took in his first term that was reversed by Joe Biden.

    The withdrawal from the Paris-based agency, which was founded after World War Two to promote peace through international cooperation in education, science, and culture, will take effect at the end of next year.

    The move is in line with the Trump administration’s broader “America-first” foreign policy, which includes a deep skepticism of multilateral groups, including the United Nations, the World Trade Organization, and the NATO alliance.

    White House spokeswoman Anna Kelly said UNESCO “supports woke, divisive cultural and social causes that are totally out-of-step with the commonsense policies that Americans voted for.”

    The State Department accused UNESCO of supporting “a globalist, ideological agenda for international development at odds with our America First foreign policy”.

    It said its decision to admit the Palestinians as a member state was “highly problematic, contrary to U.S. policy, and contributed to the proliferation of anti-Israel rhetoric.”

    UNESCO chief Audrey Azoulay said she deeply regretted Trump’s decision, but it was “expected, and UNESCO has prepared for it.”

    Posting on X, French President Emmanuel Macron professed “unwavering support” for the “universal protector” of world heritage and said the U.S. move would not weaken France’s commitment to UNESCO.

    UNESCO officials said the U.S. withdrawal would have some limited impact on U.S.-financed programs.

    Azoulay said UNESCO had diversified funding sources, receiving only about 8% of its budget from Washington.

    UNESCO was one of several international bodies Trump withdrew from during his first term, along with the World Health Organization, the Paris Agreement climate change accord, and the U.N. Human Rights Council. During his second term, he has largely reinstated those steps.

    Trump’s pick to be his U.N. envoy, Mike Waltz, said this month the United Nations needs reform while expressing confidence that “we can make the U.N. great again.”

    ISRAEL PRAISES US ‘MORAL SUPPORT AND LEADERSHIP’

    Israel welcomed the U.S. decision with its U.N. ambassador, Danny Danon, accusing UNESCO of “consistent misguided anti-Israel bias.”

    In a post on X, Israel’s Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar, thanked Washington for its “moral support and leadership” and said that “Singling out Israel and politicization by member states must end, in this and all professional UN agencies.”

    U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen, the senior Democrat on the Republican-controlled Senate Foreign Relations Committee, called Trump’s decision “short-sighted and a win for China,” which she said became the largest financial contributor to UNESCO after Trump last withdrew from the agency.

    UNESCO officials said all relevant agency statements had been agreed with both Israel and the Palestinians over the past eight years.

    Azoulay said the U.S. had given the same reasons for its pullout as it had seven years ago “even though the situation has changed profoundly, political tensions have receded, and UNESCO today constitutes a rare forum for consensus on concrete and action-oriented multilateralism.”

    “These claims also contradict the reality of UNESCO’s efforts, particularly in the field of Holocaust education and the fight against antisemitism,” she added.

    The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization is best known for designating World Heritage Sites, including the U.S. Grand Canyon and Egypt’s pyramids.

    It lists 26 sites in the United States, including the Statue of Liberty, on its World Heritage List which highlights 1,248 global locations of “outstanding universal value.”

    Washington has had a troubled relationship with UNESCO over the years.

    It was a founding member in 1945 but first withdrew in 1984 to protest alleged financial mismanagement and perceived anti-U.S. bias during the Cold War.

    It returned in 2003 under President George W. Bush, who said UNESCO had undertaken needed reforms, but in 2011 the Obama administration announced it was stopping funding for the agency following its vote to grant the Palestinians full membership.

    Trump’s first administration announced in 2017 it was quitting after accusing UNESCO of anti-Israeli bias, with Washington owing $542 million in dues, before former President Biden reversed the decision in 2023.

    (Reuters)

  • MIL-OSI Russia: How Moscow Student Parliamentary Clubs Support SVO Fighters

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: Moscow Government – Government of Moscow –

    An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.

    Since the beginning of the year, activists from the capital’s student parliamentary clubs (SPK) to fighters of the special military operation (SVO) and residents of the new subjects of the Russian Federation.

    “The collection of humanitarian aid is carried out within the framework of the project “SPKpomogaet”. The guys collect and send necessary things: medicines, paracord bracelets, basic necessities. They make many things with their own hands, for example, camouflage nets, trench candles. Aid is delivered to both military personnel and civilians,” noted

    Marina Prozorova, Deputy Head of the Department of Territorial Executive Authorities of Moscow.

    Activists often deliver humanitarian aid themselves. They delivered diesel generators, heat guns, access points for uninterrupted Internet, water boilers and drone components to the 88th reconnaissance and sabotage brigade “Espanola”. Activists also delivered humanitarian aid to the Donetsk city specialized children’s home.

    “We are creating a system of assistance where every student can make their contribution. The guys unite for a good cause, this not only changes the lives of others, but also cultivates in us civic responsibility, mutual support and the ability to work in a team,” said the chairman of the student parliamentary clubs of the Russian State Academy of Intellectual Property Matvey Potekhin.

    Student parliamentary clubs are a project of the capital’s Development Center, a subordinate institution Department of territorial executive authorities of Moscow. It includes active students from 55 Moscow universities who develop leadership skills, debate, participate in lawmaking and pave their career path. By inspiring students to actively participate in the life of the city and the country, student parliamentary clubs contribute to the formation of a new generation of patriots. To join the project, you must submit application.

    Get the latest news quicklyofficial telegram channel the city of Moscow.

    Please note: This information is raw content obtained directly from the source of the information. It is an accurate report of what the source claims and does not necessarily reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    .

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI Russia: From garden get-togethers to children’s games: Glavarkhiv published photos of Muscovites for Summer Resident Day

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: Moscow Government – Government of Moscow –

    An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.

    For Summer Resident Day, which is celebrated on July 23, Main Archives of Moscow spoke about his collections and archival materials posted in the virtual museum “Moscow – with care for history”.

    Vacationing at the dacha has long been an integral part of the summer lifestyle. It combines the opportunity to get away from the noise of the metropolis and grow something with your own hands. For many, gardening and vegetable gardening have become a favorite hobby, and the country vacation itself – a real ritual.

    In the selection “Where are you rushing to, summer?” The exhibition presents photographs not only from resorts and pioneer camps, but also from summer cottages. The works of Boris Ignatovich, Lev Reinberg, Yakov Berlin and other famous Soviet photographers convey the atmosphere of summer in all its fullness: from cozy gatherings in the garden to noisy children’s games in nature.

    At the online exhibition “Our Family” The favorite types of summer leisure of Muscovites are captured, and dacha recreation occupies a special place in this series. Warmth, silence, family peace – all this makes country life truly memorable. The exhibition presents works by masters of Russian photography, including Efim Pavlov, Vyacheslav Un Da-sin and Boris Vdovenko.

    The project occupies a special place in the virtual museum “Moscow Photo Chronicle”— the second stage of the campaign “Moscow — with care for history”. Thanks to the participation of city residents, the funds of the Main Archive are replenished with unique photographs that capture family trips, work at the dacha, gardening and summer life in different decades of the 20th century. The photographs depict children on summer vacation, apple orchards, beds and berry bushes. These images evoke warm memories filled with joy. You can see them in the virtual museum “Moscow — with care for history” in the hall “1950-2000”, in the section “Collections”, subsection “Moscow Photo Chronicle”.

    Residents of the capital can transfer items, photographs, letters and documents for permanent storage to the Main Archives through the My Documents public service centers. To do this, you only need to have your passport with you. All materials are digitized and placed in the virtual museum “Moscow – with care for history”. They are used in exhibitions, publications and other socially significant initiatives of the Main Archives of Moscow.

    Get the latest news quicklyofficial telegram channel the city of Moscow.

    Please note: This information is raw content obtained directly from the source of the information. It is an accurate report of what the source claims and does not necessarily reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    .

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI USA: July 22nd, 2025 Heinrich Announces Committee Passage of $6.5 Million to Combat Crime, Save Lives, & Keep New Mexicans Safe

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for New Mexico Martin Heinrich

    WASHINGTON — U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.) announced the bipartisan Senate Appropriations Committee passage of the Fiscal Year 2026 (FY26) Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies Appropriations Bill. With Committee approval of this bill, Heinrich secured support for over $6.5 million for nine local projects in New Mexico.

    “While this Appropriations bill isn’t perfect, it includes resources and investments I negotiated for New Mexico that will help our law enforcement officers solve and reduce violent crime, keep our communities safe, and save lives,” said Heinrich, a member of the Senate Appropriations Committee. “This legislation will allocate additional resources to investigate, respond to, and prevent crimes in Tribal communities, including funding to address the crisis of Missing and Murdered Indigenous Persons. Additionally, the bill creates a fentanyl tracking system, builds on my work to prevent firearm straw purchases and illegal gun trafficking, and makes opioid use disorder medications more accessible to New Mexicans. As a member of the Senate Appropriations Committee, I will always fight for investments that put New Mexico communities first.”

    Next, the bill will be considered by the full United States Senate.

    Congressionally Directed Spending

    Heinrich successfully included $6,521,000 in investments for the following 9 local projects in the bill:

    • $1,668,000 for the New Mexico Statewide Sexual Assault Program to increase capacity at the Helpline and Work Force Trauma Institute.
    • $1,050,000 for the Bernalillo County Sheriff’s Office for forensic analysis and crime scene reconstruction equipment.
    • $1,000,000 for the Las Cruces Police Department to establish an Evidence Processing Lab for local law enforcement agencies.
    • $908,000 for the Albuquerque Police Department to purchase crime scene processing equipment at the Metropolitan Forensic Science Center.
    • $629,000 for the City of Farmington to acquire forensic DNA and narcotics identification equipment, training, and personnel.
    • $533,000 for Eastern New Mexico University Campus to enhance lighting and safety on campus.
    • $350,000 for New Mexicans to Prevent Gun Violence to expand its youth gun violence prevention programs.
    • $268,000 for the Doña Ana County Sheriff’s Office to purchase mobile security trailers.
    • $115,000 for Gallup Police Department to purchase crime scene reconstruction equipment.

    Additionally, Heinrich and U.S. Senator Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.) successfully included $1,000,000 for the New Mexico Medical Investigator to enhance the DNA Processing Laboratory.

    Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies Key Points and Highlights

    Combatting Crimes on Tribal Lands: Heinrich successfully included language directing the Department of Justice (DOJ) to continue to allocate additional resources to address the crisis of Missing and Murdered Indigenous Persons, including providing sufficient funding to investigate, respond to, and prevent crimes in Tribal communities. Heinrich helped secure $95,000,000 within the Crime Victims Fund specifically for law enforcement efforts on Tribal lands and in order for federal, state, and tribal governments to coordinate on these critical public safety initiatives.

    Fentanyl Tracking System: Heinrich successfully included language directing the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to develop a comprehensive fentanyl tracking system. That tracking system would include documentation of seizure location, chemical composition, probable or known manufacturing location, and probable or known point of entry into the United States. Currently, fentanyl interdiction is compiled at land ports of entry by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), but the DEA does not have readily accessible tracking data on the movement of illicit drugs within the U.S. or their point of origin. Requiring the compilation and organization of that data will complement DHS’ work and improve our country’s work to effectively combat the fentanyl crisis.

    Firearm Straw Purchases Prevention: Heinrich successfully included language calling on the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) to continue its public awareness campaign to reduce firearm straw purchases at the retail level and to educate would-be straw purchasers of the penalties associated with knowingly participating in an illegal firearm purchase. This language builds on Heinrich’s work to negotiate and author the provision in the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act that increased criminal penalties for straw purchases and made it illegal to traffic firearms out of the United States. To date, more than 1,000 defendants have been charged by the Department of Justice because of those provisions, removing hundreds of firearms from the streets.

    Removing Barriers to Lifesaving Medication: Heinrich successfully included language directing the DEA to take further action to remove barriers to access for opioid use disorder medications such as buprenorphine. The data clearly shows that prescriptions of medications for opioid use disorder significantly reduce the risk of overdose death, but despite their demonstrated effectiveness, approximately 87% of those suffering from opioid use disorder do not have a prescription for these lifesaving medications. The inclusion of this language will assist local medical and mental health providers and make medications, including buprenorphine, more accessible to New Mexicans.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: July 22nd, 2025 Heinrich Announces Committee Passage of $6.5 Million to Combat Crime, Save Lives, & Keep New Mexicans Safe

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for New Mexico Martin Heinrich

    WASHINGTON — U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.) announced the bipartisan Senate Appropriations Committee passage of the Fiscal Year 2026 (FY26) Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies Appropriations Bill. With Committee approval of this bill, Heinrich secured support for over $6.5 million for nine local projects in New Mexico.

    “While this Appropriations bill isn’t perfect, it includes resources and investments I negotiated for New Mexico that will help our law enforcement officers solve and reduce violent crime, keep our communities safe, and save lives,” said Heinrich, a member of the Senate Appropriations Committee. “This legislation will allocate additional resources to investigate, respond to, and prevent crimes in Tribal communities, including funding to address the crisis of Missing and Murdered Indigenous Persons. Additionally, the bill creates a fentanyl tracking system, builds on my work to prevent firearm straw purchases and illegal gun trafficking, and makes opioid use disorder medications more accessible to New Mexicans. As a member of the Senate Appropriations Committee, I will always fight for investments that put New Mexico communities first.”

    Next, the bill will be considered by the full United States Senate.

    Congressionally Directed Spending

    Heinrich successfully included $6,521,000 in investments for the following 9 local projects in the bill:

    • $1,668,000 for the New Mexico Statewide Sexual Assault Program to increase capacity at the Helpline and Work Force Trauma Institute.
    • $1,050,000 for the Bernalillo County Sheriff’s Office for forensic analysis and crime scene reconstruction equipment.
    • $1,000,000 for the Las Cruces Police Department to establish an Evidence Processing Lab for local law enforcement agencies.
    • $908,000 for the Albuquerque Police Department to purchase crime scene processing equipment at the Metropolitan Forensic Science Center.
    • $629,000 for the City of Farmington to acquire forensic DNA and narcotics identification equipment, training, and personnel.
    • $533,000 for Eastern New Mexico University Campus to enhance lighting and safety on campus.
    • $350,000 for New Mexicans to Prevent Gun Violence to expand its youth gun violence prevention programs.
    • $268,000 for the Doña Ana County Sheriff’s Office to purchase mobile security trailers.
    • $115,000 for Gallup Police Department to purchase crime scene reconstruction equipment.

    Additionally, Heinrich and U.S. Senator Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.) successfully included $1,000,000 for the New Mexico Medical Investigator to enhance the DNA Processing Laboratory.

    Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies Key Points and Highlights

    Combatting Crimes on Tribal Lands: Heinrich successfully included language directing the Department of Justice (DOJ) to continue to allocate additional resources to address the crisis of Missing and Murdered Indigenous Persons, including providing sufficient funding to investigate, respond to, and prevent crimes in Tribal communities. Heinrich helped secure $95,000,000 within the Crime Victims Fund specifically for law enforcement efforts on Tribal lands and in order for federal, state, and tribal governments to coordinate on these critical public safety initiatives.

    Fentanyl Tracking System: Heinrich successfully included language directing the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to develop a comprehensive fentanyl tracking system. That tracking system would include documentation of seizure location, chemical composition, probable or known manufacturing location, and probable or known point of entry into the United States. Currently, fentanyl interdiction is compiled at land ports of entry by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), but the DEA does not have readily accessible tracking data on the movement of illicit drugs within the U.S. or their point of origin. Requiring the compilation and organization of that data will complement DHS’ work and improve our country’s work to effectively combat the fentanyl crisis.

    Firearm Straw Purchases Prevention: Heinrich successfully included language calling on the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) to continue its public awareness campaign to reduce firearm straw purchases at the retail level and to educate would-be straw purchasers of the penalties associated with knowingly participating in an illegal firearm purchase. This language builds on Heinrich’s work to negotiate and author the provision in the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act that increased criminal penalties for straw purchases and made it illegal to traffic firearms out of the United States. To date, more than 1,000 defendants have been charged by the Department of Justice because of those provisions, removing hundreds of firearms from the streets.

    Removing Barriers to Lifesaving Medication: Heinrich successfully included language directing the DEA to take further action to remove barriers to access for opioid use disorder medications such as buprenorphine. The data clearly shows that prescriptions of medications for opioid use disorder significantly reduce the risk of overdose death, but despite their demonstrated effectiveness, approximately 87% of those suffering from opioid use disorder do not have a prescription for these lifesaving medications. The inclusion of this language will assist local medical and mental health providers and make medications, including buprenorphine, more accessible to New Mexicans.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Cassidy Introduces Bill to Examine National Security Threat Posed by Debt

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Louisiana Bill Cassidy

    WASHINGTON – U.S. Senator Bill Cassidy, M.D. (R-LA) introduced the National Net Interest is National Security Act to analyze the threats that current trajectories of the national debt and net interest pose to national security.
    “We spent $882 billion last year on interest on our debt. That means less money for our nation’s defense,” said Dr. Cassidy. “This bill makes sure Congress gets the facts before our national security is in danger.”
    Specifically, the National Net Interest is National Security Act would require:

    Within one year, as a part of the National Defense Strategy, the Treasury Secretary and Secretaries of Defense and State must send Congress a report on how the growing national debt and rising interest payments could threaten national security, including: 

    The impact on defense discretionary spending;
    Revenue received by the federal government;
    The capacity to operate an efficient and effective response for national defense;
    The capacity to respond to emerging and future geopolitical threats and crises;
    The capacity to respond to economic depressions and recessions, or other economic crises;
    Meet mandatory spending obligations, including Social Security and Medicare/Medicaid;
    The impact on the U.S. Dollar in global financial markets, global reserves currency status, and international exchange rates;
    And the impact on the U.S. credit rating, inflation, and interest rates; and,
    Any recommendations the Secretary may have for legislative action to reduce national security risks related to the national debt and net interest. 
    This legislation would also require the Comptroller General of the Government Accountability Office (GAO) to include matters relating to threats posed to national security by the increases of the national debt and national net interest to matters on the High-Risk List of the GAO.

    Cassidy was joined by U.S. Senator Gary Peters (D-MI) in introducing this legislation.
    “As the high and rising debt threatens to crowd out vital national priorities, from private investment to public infrastructure to military readiness, we thank Sens. Cassidy (R-LA) and Peters (D-MI) for drawing attention to the need for immediate action to reduce deficits, through their bipartisan introduction of theNational Net Interest is National Security Act of 2025,” says Michele Stockwell, president of Bipartisan Policy Center Action (BPC Action).

    MIL OSI USA News

  • Ozzy Osbourne, Black Sabbath’s bat-biting frontman, dies aged 76

    Source: Government of India

    Source: Government of India (4)

    Ozzy Osbourne, frontman of 1970s heavy metal band Black Sabbath, earned his infamy biting the head off a bat on stage and pursuing a drug-fuelled lifestyle before reinventing himself as a loveable if often foul-mouthed reality TV star.

    Known to fans as “The Prince of Darkness” and the “Godfather of Heavy Metal,” Osbourne has died at the age of 76, his family said in a statement on Tuesday.

    “It is with more sadness than mere words can convey that we have to report that our beloved Ozzy Osbourne has passed away this morning. He was with his family and surrounded by love,” they said.

    Osbourne kicked off his career in the early 1970s as singer on Black Sabbath’s hits, from “Paranoid” to “War Pigs” to “Sabbath Bloody Sabbath”. Those plus a string of solo releases saw him sell more than 100 million records worldwide.

    The hard riffs and dark subject matter – from depression to war to apocalypse – combined with an instinct for Halloween theatrics. As a performer, Osbourne sprinkled audiences with raw meat and, in 1982, had his encounter with a bat thrown on stage by a fan.

    He always insisted he thought it was a toy until he bit into it, realised his mistake and rushed to hospital for a rabies shot. He later sold branded bat soft toys with a removable head.

    Osbourne was a regular target for conservative and religious groups concerned about the negative impact of rock music on young people. He acknowledged the excesses of his lifestyle and lyrics – but poured scorn on the wilder reports that he was an actual devil-worshipper.

    “I’ve done some bad things in my time. But I ain’t the devil. I’m just John Osbourne: a working-class kid from Aston who quit his job in the factory and went looking for a good time,” he said in a 2010 biography.

    REALITY SHOW STAR

    John Michael Osbourne was the fourth of six children. Growing up in Aston, Birmingham, in central England, he struggled with dyslexia, left school at age 15, did a series of menial jobs, and at one point served a brief prison sentence for burglary. Then came Black Sabbath.

    “When I was growing up, if you’d have put me up against a wall with the other kids from my street and asked me which one of us was gonna make it to the age of 60, with five kids and four grandkids and houses in Buckinghamshire and California, I wouldn’t have put money on me, no fucking way,” he once said.

    Britain’s Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood, a member of parliament representing a Birmingham constituency, wrote on X that she was devastated to hear the news of his death.

    “One of the greatest gifts my city gave the world,” Mahmood said.

    In 2002, Osbourne won legions of new fans when he starred in U.S. reality TV show “The Osbournes”.

    Cameras followed the aging rock god ambling round his huge house in Beverly Hills, pronouncing on events in his heavy Birmingham accent and looking on bemused at the antics of his family.

    Osbourne‘s family included wife and manager Sharon, five children including Jack, Kelly and Aimee, and several grandchildren.

    No cause of death was given, but Osbourne revealed in 2020 that he had been diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease. The illness made him unable to walk.

    In his final concert on July 5 in Birmingham, Osbourne performed sitting, at times appearing to have difficulties speaking as he thanked thousands of adoring fans, some of whom were visibly emotional.

    Osbourne‘s performance followed a number of tributes on stage and on stadium screens from rock and pop royalty including Aerosmith’s Steven Tyler, Metallica’s James Hetfield and Elton John.

    Thanks for your support over the years. Thank you from the bottom of my heart. I love you,” said Osbourne.

    -Reuters

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Doorstop – Parliament House, Canberra

    Source: Murray Darling Basin Authority

    JASON CLARE, MINISTER FOR EDUCATION: Thanks very much for coming along. Today’s a big day. Today, I’ll introduce two pieces of legislation. The first, to cut student debt by 20 per cent; and the second, to cut funding to childcare centres that aren’t up to scratch, that aren’t meeting the sort of minimum standards that parents need and that our children deserve.

    The first piece of legislation to cut student debt by 20 per cent is something that we promised, I think, every day of the election campaign in every part of the country. It means cutting the debt of three million Australians. A lot of those are young Australians. Often young people don’t see themselves on the ballot paper when they go to vote, but a lot of young people did at this election, and they voted for it in their millions. The impact of this legislation is that for the average person with a student debt, they’ll see their debt cut by about $5,500. That’s a big deal. That’s a lot of weight off their back, and it will help a lot of young people that might be just out of uni, just out of home, just getting started.

    The second piece of legislation that I’ll introduce is about giving the Commonwealth the powers that we need to be able to cut access to the child care subsidy for centres that aren’t up to scratch. I think the whole country has been sickened and shocked by the revelations that have come out of Victoria in the last few weeks, and a lot of work is needed to rebuild trust in a system that parents rely upon every single day – more than a million parents across the country – and this legislation is part of that. The biggest weapon that the Commonwealth has to wield here is the funding that we provide that enables child care centres to operate. It’s something like $16 billion a year, and that covers about 70 per cent of the cost of running the average child care centre. Child care centres can’t operate without it, and I think it’s fair, I think most mums and dads will think it’s fair, that if centres are repeatedly not meeting the sort of standards that we set for them, that we should have the power to be able to cut that funding off. This is not about shutting centres down. It’s about lifting standards up and giving us the powers to make that happen.

    I might pass to Andrew to talk in a little bit of detail about the cut to student debt by 20 per cent, and then ask Jess to talk a little bit more about the legislation that we’ll introduce today to be able to cut funding to centres that aren’t up to scratch.

    ANDREW GILES, MINISTER FOR SKILLS AND TRAINING: Thanks very much, Jason. From our very first day in office, the Albanese Labor Government has been committed to breaking down all of those barriers that have held back too many Australians from accessing education and training. And today, we take another really big step forward in that regard. I’m going to talk really to make two points about this. The first one is to recognise the significance, as Jason just laid out, of this first piece of legislation – a piece of legislation that we talked about constantly through the campaign, and indeed since the commitment was made some months before that. A commitment that really resonated with so many Australians, three million of whom will benefit from this cut. Real cost of living relief. Money back in the pockets of Australians who can do with that help and that message of reassurance. I want to say this, though – not only have we been listening to students in Australia, we’ve been listening to all of the students in tertiary education and apprentices too, because this is not just relief from HECS debt. It’s relief that will also support nearly 300,000 students with various VET loans. They will also benefit.

    And that leads me to the second point I want to make here. There really is never a better time than now to think about pursuing a VET pathway. At the same time that we made this commitment that Jason will be introducing in the form of legislation today, we also made our commitment to make Free TAFE permanent. And that has been an extraordinary success in turning around the skills crisis and breaking down another barrier that’s held back too many Australians from accessing skills. As of today, more than 170,000 Free TAFE courses have been completed. More than 650,000 enrolments have taken place. This is making a huge difference alongside so many other incentives, like the one that’s just rolled out for 1 July encouraging more people to pick up the tools and become a housing tradie. There is more to be done of course, but all of these commitments demonstrate our determination to do everything possible to deliver cost of living relief today, and to create more pathways for more Australians to get the skills they want to do the jobs that we need. I’ll hand over Jess to talk about the second bill.

    JESS WALSH, MINISTER FOR EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION: Thanks very much, Andrew. Thanks very much, Jason. Well, every child deserves to be safe in early childhood education and care, and every parent deserves to know that their children are safe too. But it has been a really distressing time for children and their families as we see these revelations unfold in Victoria. It’s been distressing for parents. It’s been distressing for the vast majority of early childhood educators as well, who are just going into work every day to take the best care that they can of our nation’s children. We want to rebuild the confidence that our early learning centres are safe and that they do provide quality early education. And of course, the vast majority of our early learning services do that every single day. But there are some repeat offenders who continue to put profit ahead of child safety, and that’s what the legislation that we’re introducing today is targeted to deal with. We have a strong message for those providers who do put profit ahead of child safety, and that is that we want you to lift your game or to leave the sector.

    Our focus is going to be on helping those providers to lift their game, and this legislation will give us the tools to do that. It will allow us to withdraw Commonwealth Child Care Subsidy from those providers who persistently and consistently let families down. It gives us a strong stick that we’re willing to use to drive standards in early childhood education to deliver the quality and the safety that parents deserve.

    JOURNALIST: Minister Clare, the Minister has just spoken about this legislation being a stick to encourage providers to do the right thing. Are there any, what else is in this bill to actually help some of the providers to do more? I mean, some of the big providers have talked about needing more funds or assistance for training, for instance; for CCTV cameras and so forth. What else is in this bill beyond stick?

    CLARE: Well, this legislation is about giving the Commonwealth the power to cut off funding, cut off the childcare subsidy funding to centres that aren’t meeting that minimum standard, that are repeatedly not meeting that minimum standard. Now these centres know the standard they have to set, now they know what the consequences will be if they don’t meet it. The legislation also gives more power to the authorised officers in our department to be able to do spot checks of centres, particularly in the area of fraud. This is another area that is very serious that we’ve been working on, that I’ve been working on now for three years. The Government’s provided about an extra $220 million for fraud investigation of early education and care. It’s helped to claw back more than $300 million for the Australian taxpayer. This gives more power to our officers to be able to do spot checks without a warrant or without the AFP on board, but they will also be able to, if they spot safety concerns, pass that on to state regulators as well.

    Now, Josh, you make the point that this isn’t the only thing we need to do, and that is absolutely right. When education ministers meet next month, we’ll be talking about some of the things you just mentioned. A national educator register so that we can track workers from centre to centre and from state to state. I think the revelations in Victoria over the course of the last few weeks tell us exactly why this is so important. CCTV and the role that it can potentially play in deterring a bad person from doing heinous things and also helping police with their investigations, but also the sort of training, mandatory child safety training, that already exists in the courses but doesn’t exist in the classroom, doesn’t exist in centres, that can play a crucial role in helping to make sure that the 99.9 per cent of people who are good and honest and hardworking and care for and love our kids and educate our kids every day, the people who are aghast at what they’re reading in the newspapers and are angry that their profession is in the media for the wrong reasons, have the skills they need to spot a bad person before they act. To have the skills that they need to spot somebody who might be looking to do something terrible to children or to distract them from stepping in and stopping it from happening. So whether it’s the register, whether it’s training, or whether it’s CCTV or a bunch of other things that will come out, I’m sure of the rapid review in Victoria and the work that’s being done in New South Wales, all of that is on the table when education ministers meet next month.

    The other thing I should mention here for the sake of completeness is the Attorney-General will also meet with AGs across the country next month to look at the reforms that are needed that are long overdue to working with children checks.

    JOURNALIST: How many breaches of the minimum standards would take you to strip the childcare centre of its funding? What’s the threshold in the legislation?

    CLARE: State regulators can shut a centre down right now if they think there’s a real and imminent threat to childcare safety. So they can do that today. What this legislation gives us the power to do is to shut a centre down if we think they’re below the minimum standard and they’re not likely to get there or they’re not intending to get there. So we can issue a show cause notice and say you’ve got 28 days, give us a good explanation about why you’re not there or we will cut your funding. Alternatively, we might set some conditions on the centre and say you’ve got a period of time to reach that standard, to meet the requirements that the state regulator has told you to reach, potentially to employ a child safety expert in the centre to help you reach them. And as I said, I want centres to get to those standards. We don’t want to have to shut centres down. But also we want to make sure that parents know that if a centre has a show cause notice given to it, or it’s got conditions that are imposed upon it, that mums and dads at that centre deserve to know that we’ve done that and to be able to make a decision about where they want to send their kids.

    JOURNALIST: You just said that state and territory governments already have the power to shut down centres. What difference is this going to make now that the Commonwealth has that power as well?

    CLARE: Well, they have that power and they use it. This is an additional power to make sure that the centres, and there are a number of them that are not at that minimum standard, take the action that they need to take to lift their standards to the sort of standards that we set as a nation, that parents expect and that our children deserve.

    JOURNALIST: So do you think that state and territory governments haven’t been doing enough of that kind of putting that pressure and threatening to shut places down, or shutting places down, if you feel like the Commonwealth needs to step into this?

    CLARE: Well, states do that work now. They tell centres about the standards they expect them to meet, and sometimes centres don’t meet them, and the problem remains unfixed. This gives us the power to step in there where centres are just either deliberately or for whatever reason not meeting those sorts of standards. The bottom line, though, is we all need to do more here. States need to do more. The Commonwealth needs to do more. Centres need to do more as well.

    JOURNALIST: Minister, just on HECS, obviously this is a one-off cut, but what about future students? Is it not unfair to only have this one line in the sand and cut it by 20 per cent? What about the students of the future?

    CLARE: Look, I think there’s a lot of work to do to make our education system better and fairer. And there’s a lot of work to do to make our higher education system better and fairer. The fact is today about 50 per cent of young people have a uni degree, but not everywhere. Not where I grew up, not in the outer suburbs of our big cities, not in regional Australia, not amongst kids from poor and disadvantaged backgrounds. And I want to fix that. That’s what the Universities Accord is all about, and we’ve already taken steps to implement some of that report –

    JOURNALIST: Does that –

    CLARE: Hang on a second. Part of that’s Paid Prac that rolls out this month – financial support for the first time for teaching students and nursing students and midwifery and social work students while they do the practical part of their university degree. Part of it is also uncapping funding for the fee-free university bridging courses that help make sure that people that have finished high school, or maybe they haven’t finished high school and aren’t ready for a uni degree, are ready for it. Part of it is also changing the way that we fund universities. Over the course of the last 12 months or so, I’ve struck agreements with every state and territory to fix the funding of public schools, what David Gonski called for more than a decade ago. Now, what we’ll do next year is change the funding of universities, so it’s needs-based as well, and the funding follows the student. And so more funding flows to students from disadvantaged backgrounds and students from regional Australia, because we know that there is not just fewer young people from disadvantaged backgrounds starting a degree but fewer finishing a degree.

    It also means, and I’m sorry for the long answer, but this is a comprehensive piece of work, building and operating more university Hubs in our outer suburbs, in our regions. When I was a kid growing up, there were a lot of Macca’s logos and a lot of Westfield logos in Western Sydney, not a lot of uni logos. Uni felt like it was someplace else for somewhere else. And a lot of my mates just either dropped out of school or finished school, never thought of uni because they thought it wasn’t for them. I want to change that too. And that’s what those Hubs are about. But this Accord is big. It’s the work of multiple governments and multiple ministers. That’s why we’ve set up the Australian Tertiary Education Commission to act as a steward to drive long-term reform here. And there is more work to do. This is just the start.

    JOURNALIST: If I can just follow up on that. Does that mean some of those changes involve potentially cutting student fees into the future?

    CLARE: Well, the ATEC’s job is to look at all of that. Not just that, but all of that.

    JOURNALIST: Can I go back to child care? I’m obviously very mindful you’re introducing this legislation today and the national database, it does require sort of corralling the states and territories. It’s a tricky job. Can you wait for this much longer, for this meeting to happen in the middle of August or later in August for a three-year period? And then can I ask as well, what’s the timeline for fresh year is setting up the database? This would take some time, would it not?

    CLARE: Josh, the truth is this should have happened yesterday. And this can’t happen fast enough. And states are already taking steps to expand their existing teacher registers. Victoria is a good example of that, and they’ll have that stood up by the end of August. So where states do that, that’s good, but we need to join it up, because to make the system work the way it needs to work, we need to be able to track people not just from centre to centre, but from state to state. And if you want evidence of why that’s important, have a look at the Ashley Griffith case in Queensland from a couple of years ago.

    JOURNALIST: If I may, this is on another issue –

    CLARE: Yep, and then we’ll bounce back.

    JOURNALIST: When are we looking to see the Government’s 2035 emissions target, and can we expect a more ambitious target?

    CLARE: Oh, look, I’ll ask you to talk to Chris Bowen about that. I’m pretty busy today on some pretty important things.

    JOURNALIST: Just back on the future student stuff, the cost of an arts or humanities degree has almost doubled under the last government. Is that something you’re looking to change this term?

    CLARE: Really, it’s the same answer that I gave just a moment ago about the role of the ATEC.

    JOURNALIST: Could I just follow you up on one of the questions you asked a minute ago? What’s the timeline for setting up a register like this with the national database for the childcare workers? I mean, and I believe there was a Child Safety Authority report in 2013 that said investigations into –

    CLARE: 2023, I think, Josh?

    JOURNALIST: Maybe 2023. The problem is investigations into sexual assaults that were unsubstantiated, whether they would be included in a data set?

    CLARE: Two separate questions. We want to stand this up as quickly as possible, and I mentioned in my previous answer the work that states are doing, but ACECQA, the National Independent Authority, is doing that work about what the elements of the register need to involve, and that will be presented to ministers when we meet in August. On that second question, that’s something that attorneys will be looking at as part of the working with children checks.

    JOURNALIST: Is it time for a national watchdog in this space?

    CLARE: Well, one of the things that the Productivity Commission recommended when they provided us with a blueprint for reform of early education and care, and I touched on the Accord, which is the equivalent for higher education, is a national early education and care commission. And I’ve got an open mind about that. I’ve said that in the media last week. What that report said is we’ve got to do a number of things to build a better, a fairer and a safer early education and care system. One of those, the first of those, is to pay workers more. When you pay people more, more people want to and we’re seeing the evidence of that this year. That 15 per cent pay rise has meant that we’re now seeing more people come back to the sector and building a permanent workforce. Our kids will be safer if the workers are permanent, that they’re not moving in and out of centres all the time. So that pay rise is already reaping dividends for parents and for our children. It also recommended that we remove the activity test so kids from disadvantaged backgrounds don’t miss out on the value of early education and care. And it’s recommended a commission like this. In its report, it didn’t say that this would have a role in safety, but that doesn’t mean that it can’t. And this is something that we will look at in the future.

    JOURNALIST: It was already hard to get child care workers in Australia. I know that there’s been a pay rise since then. Are you concerned that people aren’t going to be choosing child care careers following the really heinous allegations that have come out?

    CLARE: I might ask Jess to comment on this as well because I know how dear this is to your heart. We want people to do this job. There aren’t many jobs in this country more important. They’re vested with the trust of our most precious things, our children. The little ones that walk through the door or are carried through the door of centres every single day. And that pay rise is doing what we really wanted it to do last year. We’re seeing the number of people applying to be an early education and care worker jump by, what is it, Jess, more than 20 per cent. The number of vacancies drop by about the same amount as well. That tells us if you pay people more, people want to do the job. And I do worry that these people who do this incredibly important job, one of them is my cousin, she’s worked in this sector for 35 years. I remember when my little guy first went into care, I said, ‘how do I pick a good centre?’ And she said, ‘go to the place where the people have been working there forever, where they don’t want to leave.’ That’s a great centre, but it’s also a safe centre. And if we want that to be everywhere, you’ve got to pay people better. A lot of people have been leaving to go and work at Bunnings and Woolies just because you could earn more. And so that’s why that pay rise is important and that’s why rebuilding trust and faith in in this service, in this system, is so important.

    WALSH: Thanks, Jason. Well, I think when Jason’s answered a question, there’s not much left to say. But I’ve been going out to early childhood education centres for the past few weeks and talking to educators as they grapple with this. And they are absolutely devastated and distressed by these allegations. But it’s not making them want to leave the sector. It’s making them determined to stay. These are the people who want to provide quality early childhood education. That is what they are there for. That is what they are going into work to do every single day. We do want to see more dedicated, committed early childhood educators in the sector. And that is exactly what is happening with the pay rise, a historic pay rise of 15 per cent that educators themselves advocated for years and years. The previous government didn’t take action on that front. It meant that early childhood educators were undervalued. It meant that in our first term of office the workforce was really in crisis. People were leaving the jobs that they love because they weren’t earning enough and love just doesn’t pay the bills. So what we’re seeing with this pay rise is people coming back to the sector. We’re seeing people stay in the sector and we’re seeing them able to provide that really high quality care that children deserve and that they want to provide. And again, that continuity in an early learning centre with educators is the absolute key to quality and safety. When educators know each other, when they know the children, when they know the families, that’s when we get quality, safe, early childhood education. This historic 15 per cent pay rise has been a game changer for that.

    CLARE: Thanks very much everybody.
     

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Prime Ministers of Belarus and Tanzania held talks on promising areas of cooperation

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: People’s Republic of China in Russian – People’s Republic of China in Russian –

    An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    MINSK, July 23 /Xinhua/ — Belarusian Prime Minister Aleksandr Turchin and his Tanzanian counterpart Kassim Majaliwa Majaliwa held talks in Minsk on Tuesday to develop political and interdepartmental dialogue, and discussed ways to develop bilateral trade and cooperation in food security, BelTA reported.

    During the meeting, A. Turchin noted that Belarus views Tanzania as an important partner in East Africa. “We see significant prospects for expanding cooperation in such areas as mechanical engineering, petrochemistry, medical, food and military-technical industries, tourism,” he noted and added that Belarus is ready to supply a wide range of quarry, road construction, municipal and fire-fighting equipment.

    Also, according to A. Turchin, Belarus is open to expanding supplies of coffee, tea, nuts, cotton, fruits and other products from Tanzania, including for processing and sale on the market of the Eurasian Economic Union.

    The Prime Minister of Tanzania noted that Belarusian business could consider opportunities for closer cooperation with the Tanzanian side in the agricultural sector. “The main focus should be on cooperation in the sphere of trade and economy,” he said.

    Following the negotiations, a number of agreements were concluded, in particular memorandums on political consultations, on cooperation in agriculture and on interaction in the field of education. A memorandum of cooperation was also signed between the Belarusian Chamber of Commerce and Industry and the Chamber of Commerce, Industry and Agriculture of Tanzania. –0–

    Please note: This information is raw content obtained directly from the source of the information. It is an accurate report of what the source claims and does not necessarily reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    .

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Case Opposes Public Lands And Natural Resources Funding Measure That Cripples Efforts To Combat Climate Change And Slashes Funds For National Parks

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Ed Case (Hawai‘i – District 1)

    (Washington, DC) – U.S. Congressman Ed Case (HI-01), a member of the House Appropriations Committee, voted in full Committee today against the proposed Fiscal Year (FY) 2026 Interior Appropriations bill that cut $2.9 billion from programs and agencies that support public lands and our nation’s natural resources.   

    The Interior, Environment and Related Appropriations bill funds the U.S. Department of the Interior, including the National Park Service (NPS), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Geological Survey, Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Forest Service and various independent agencies including the National Endowments on Arts and the Humanities. The bill’s FY 2026 discretionary funding level is $38 billion. This is a decrease of $2.9 billion from the FY 2025 enacted level.  

    “While these measures fund many critical Hawai‘i and priorities I requested, I regrettably had to vote against this version because it cripples efforts to deal with climate change by defunding all of the climate work by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,” said Case. 

    “It further decimates public lands by slashing funding for the National Park Service and gutting key conservation agencies that protect our parks, forests and wildlife. It also undermines museums and cultural institutions, cutting support for the Smithsonian and slashing the arts and humanities by $72 million each.”

    In full Committee debate on the measure, Case voiced his strong opposition to the bill’s proposed $1.7 billion in cuts to federal support for Drinking Water and Clean Water State Revolving Funds (see remarks here: https://youtu.be/0w197WN4wys).

    These vital programs offer low-cost financing to local communities for a broad spectrum of water quality infrastructure projects. They have played a critical role in efforts to remediate Red Hill, including supporting technical assistance for source water protection, and are critical to continued maintenance of Hawaii’s drinking water quality. 

    “Red Hill reinforced all over again that in an island community our water systems are fragile and priceless,” Case said.  

    “We need sustained investment not just to meet the urgent demands of remediation, but to ensure the long-term safety, resilience, and sustainability of our water infrastructure. We cannot cut back now on the very programs that have made that possible over the last half century,” Case said. 

    Continued support for the State Revolving Funds is also essential to Hawaii’s ability to confront emerging contaminants like PFAS, or “forever chemicals,” which pose serious risks to public health and the environment. Furthermore, these funds are critical for moving forward on 38 high-priority water infrastructure projects across the state. These projects strengthen drinking water safety, improve wastewater treatment, and build long-term resilience in Hawaii’s water systems. Without adequate federal investment, many of these initiatives risk delay or cancellation, leaving our communities vulnerable. 

    However, the measure added several of Case’s priority requests, including: 

    ·         $5 million for U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s State of the Birds Activities to respond to the urgent needs of critically endangered birds that now face possible extinction. These funds will help save numerous endemic birds in Hawai‘i that have been devastated by climate change and avian malaria.  

    ·         $45 million for the U.S. Geological Survey Biological Threats and Invasive Species Research Program.  

    ·         $66 million for the U.S. Geological Survey’s Climate Adaptation Science Centers, which includes the Pacific Islands Climate Adaptation Science Center based out of the University of Hawai‘i-Mānoa. These centers provide regionally relevant scientific information, tools and techniques to resource managers and communities in Hawai‘i in response to our changing climate.  

    ·         $63 million for State Historic Preservation Offices, which will help preserve Hawaii’s treasured historic properties.

    ·         $80 million for State Fire Assistance, which provides financial and technical support directly to states to enhance firefighting capacity, support community-based hazard mitigation and expand outreach and education to homeowners and communities concerning fire prevention. 

    ·         $20 million for the Joint Fire Science Program, which supports a national collaboration of fire science exchanges providing science information to federal, state, local, tribal and private stakeholders.  

    ·         $5 million for Japanese Confinement Site Grants and funding for the Amache National Historic Site, which was one of ten incarceration sites established by the War Relocation Authority during World War II to detain Japanese Americans who were forcibly removed from their communities on the West Coast.  

    Through his assignment on the Committee, Case was also able to secure a Member-designated Community Project Funding (CPF) project of $1,092,000 for the Department of Hawaiian Homelands (DHHL) to upgrade the sewer infrastructure at Papakōlea.  

    “Papakōlea is the only Hawaiian Home Lands community located in central Honolulu with more than 300 homes and some 1,300 residents,” said Case. “As the infrastructure in Papakōlea ages, the sewer system has become susceptible to cracks, root intrusions and other defects that diminish the effectiveness of the service lines. My CPF will assist DHHL to work on a sewer line rehabilitation/replacement program for the community.” 

    The House’s CPF rules require that each project must have demonstrated community support, must be fully disclosed by the requesting Member and must be subject to audit by the independent Government Accountability Office. Case’s disclosures are here: https://case.house.gov/services/funding-disclosures.htm.  

    A summary of the bill is available here.  

    This is the eighth bill of twelve separate bills developed and approved by the Appropriations Committee that would fund the federal government at some $1.6 trillion for FY 2026 commencing October 1st of this year. The bill now moves on to the full House of Representatives for its consideration.

    ###

     

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-Evening Report: Young Japanese voters embrace right-wing populist parties, leaving the prime minister on the brink

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Craig Mark, Adjunct Lecturer, Faculty of Economics, Hosei University

    Japan’s ruling coalition suffered the widely expected loss of its majority in the July 20 election, as young voters shifted to the populist right. As a result, Shigeru Ishiba’s prime ministership now hangs in the balance.

    The election was for half of the 248 members of the House of Councillors, the upper house of the National Diet, Japan’s parliament. The Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) secured 39 seats, and its minor coalition partner, the Komeito Party, just eight. This left it three seats short of the 50 required to maintain its majority, as populist opposition parties made dramatic gains.

    The LDP is now confronted with minorities in both houses of the Diet for the first time in the party’s 70-year history. It is a huge decline from its postwar dominance of Japanese politics.

    In a press conference on Monday, Ishiba said he would not resign, as the LDP remained the largest party in the upper house. He also insisted he needed to stay in office to complete negotiations with the Trump administration, which had threatened to continue harsh trade tariffs after August 1.

    But Ishiba is facing calls from disgruntled LDP Diet members to step down. He had already led the LDP into minority government in last October’s election for the lower house of the Diet, the House of Representatives. He called the snap election in the wake of securing LDP leadership last September.




    Read more:
    Why did Japan’s new leader trigger snap elections only a week after taking office? And what happens next?


    However, the main opposition Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan (CDP) was not responsible for this latest defeat – it managed only to retain its 22 seats. Instead, the LDP and Komeito instead lost out to the two rising populist parties: the centre-right Democratic Party for the People (DPFP), which went from four to 17 seats, and the far-right Sanseito party, which made the most dramatic gains, from one to 14 seats.

    Main opposition leader Yoshihiko Noda now needs to again consider whether to bring on a motion of no confidence in the Ishiba cabinet in the lower house. Last month, he backed away from doing so. Such a motion would likely succeed with the support of the other opposition parties, and immediately trigger a snap lower house election. But it would also be highly risky, as it could allow the two right-wing parties to again overshadow the main opposition.

    The young shift to the right

    Exit polls showed younger people voted in greater numbers for the two right-wing parties. Their dissatisfaction erupted against the political status quo that has long favoured older generations. Older Japanese remain the main supporters for the two major parties, as well as the smaller Komeito and the declining Japanese Communist Party.

    Many voters were angry about declining wages, persistent inflation, and a growing tax burden to fund the straining pension and welfare system that disproportionately benefits the elderly.

    The leaders of the two right-wing parties, 56-year-old Yuichiro Tamaki and 47-year-old Sohei Kamiya, more effectively used social media to exploit this electoral discontent and push their populist messages.

    Sanseito emerged at the start of the COVID pandemic in March 2020. It promoted anti-vaccination conspiracy theories and xenophobia through its campaign slogan of “Japanese First”.

    As more people have expressed frustration with Japan’s record tourist numbers, Sanseito and the smaller far-right Conservative Party of Japan sought to scapegoat the relatively small foreign resident population of waging a “silent invasion”.

    This includes spreading false stories about them causing local crime waves, depressing wages, hiking real estate prices, and abusing welfare.

    The number of foreign-born residents, mostly from other Asian countries, has steadily risen to 3.8 million to meet the demands of the shrinking labour force. However, it still only comprises about 3% of Japan’s (ageing and shrinking) population.

    Despite running and electing a majority of female candidates, Sanseito has also attracted criticism for wanting to end gender equality so as to raise the birth rate. It also wants to remove democratic protections from the postwar constitution and return to an imperial form of government.

    The success of the two right-wing parties, along with the nationalist neoliberal Japan Innovation Party, threatens to transform Japanese politics.

    However, it remains to be seen whether they will be able to cooperate effectively in the Diet with other parties to enact their policy agenda. This includes cutting the consumption tax rate while boosting subsidies to support families and farmers, and restricting immigration.

    Uncertainty reigns

    The increased political uncertainty will raise concerns about Japan’s ability to continue its strategic reorientation. It has pledged to increase its defence spending to 2% of gross domestic product (GDP). It also wants to increase security cooperation with Europe, India and Australia.

    The LDP’s Diet members will hold a full party meeting on July 31 to assess the election. If a majority of LDP members across both houses and representatives of the party’s prefectural chapters petition for a leadership ballot, they could mount a spill against Ishiba.

    Ishiba now needs to continue to negotiate with opposition parties to pass legislation in both houses of the Diet. US President Donald Trump’s sudden announcement that a “massive” deal has been struck with Japan for a reciprocal tariff rate of 15% may yet give him a temporary political reprieve.

    But as his post-election approval rating hits a record low 23%, his ailing premiership looks even more vulnerable.

    Craig Mark does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. Young Japanese voters embrace right-wing populist parties, leaving the prime minister on the brink – https://theconversation.com/young-japanese-voters-embrace-right-wing-populist-parties-leaving-the-prime-minister-on-the-brink-261673

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI China: Hong Kong sees equity market revival amid policy incentives, improved outlook

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    Recent initiatives from the central government have boosted market liquidity. Upgrades to the Bond Connect, enhancements to the Cross-boundary Wealth Management Connect Scheme, and facilitative payment arrangements for Hong Kong and Macao residents purchasing properties in the Chinese mainland cities of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area (GBA), have contributed to this positive momentum.

    The China Securities Regulatory Commission’s efforts to optimize the Shanghai-Hong Kong and Shenzhen-Hong Kong stock connects further reinforce Hong Kong’s status as an international financial hub.

    Economist Leung Hoi Ming notes that China’s position as the world’s second-largest economy is expected to contribute about 21 percent of global GDP growth, providing solid support for Hong Kong stocks.

    Hong Kong consistently ranks as the world’s freest economy, third among global financial centers, and maintains top positions in investment climate, international trade, commercial regulations, and air cargo.

    The Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR) government’s moves to streamline market listing procedures have helped boost initial public offerings (IPOs) by 30 percent year on year to 52 cases by mid-July. Total funds raised soared 590 percent to 124 billion Hong Kong dollars (15.8 billion U.S. dollars), making Hong Kong the biggest IPO market worldwide, HKSAR Chief Executive John Lee said in a social media post on Monday.

    The unique valuation advantage of Hong Kong stocks continues to attract both international and Chinese mainland investments. Recent data indicates a significant influx of southbound funds, reflecting renewed confidence among Chinese mainland investors.

    Carlson Tong, chairman of Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited (HKEX), mentioned that Chinese mainland companies currently listed in Hong Kong account for 81 percent of the total market value.

    The ongoing strength of Hong Kong stocks positively impacts both local and Chinese mainland capital markets, enhancing investor confidence and liquidity. Kevin Liu, chief offshore China and Overseas strategist at China International Capital Corporation, highlighted that active liquidity in the Hong Kong stock market is evident in an average daily trading volume of 240.6 billion Hong Kong dollars, showing a notable increase compared to the average daily trading volume in 2024, setting a historical high.

    Improved financing conditions are encouraging companies to list and refinance, particularly in high-growth sectors like technology and innovation. Since early 2025, driven by sectors such as AI, new consumption, and innovative pharmaceuticals, Hong Kong’s market has even outperformed its global counterparts at times, said Liu.

    As the stock market rises, global interest in China’s economy increases, promoting a virtuous circle of capital market openness and high-quality economic development, experts say.

    Leung believes that the stock market’s rise reflects positive expectations regarding the fundamentals of the economy of the Chinese mainland, attracting more attention and investment from global capital. This influx brings more mature investment concepts and resources into the capital market, further optimizing its structure, he added.

    Meanwhile, experts emphasize the need for continued market optimization to attract long-term investment, noting that encouraging more quality companies to list in Hong Kong will deepen and stabilize the market, enhancing its appeal as a global capital platform.

    The HKSAR government will continue to improve the listing regime and boost market liquidity to attract more high-quality global companies to list in Hong Kong, Lee pledged earlier. 

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI China: Time for China, EU to broaden consensus on navigating next 50 years of relations

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    The upcoming China-EU Summit presents a valuable opportunity to reflect on the experience and insights gained from 50 years of bilateral ties. It offers a platform to build consensus and chart a stable and healthy path forward that benefits both sides and the world.

    The summit comes at a time when geopolitical tensions, protectionism and unilateralism are increasingly fragmenting global relations. Furthermore, China-EU relations are at a critical juncture, presenting opportunities for deepening pragmatic cooperation while also highlighting the need for strengthened strategic communication to address global challenges and effectively manage differences.

    In this context, there is hope that the meeting will convey clear and positive messages to advance win-win cooperation based on mutual respect and openness. The summit aims to chart a course for the next 50 years of bilateral relations, safeguard free trade and multilateralism, and provide certainty and positive energy in a world facing mounting challenges.

    The past half century has witnessed remarkable developments of China-EU cooperation. The bilateral trade volume of goods increased from 2.4 billion U.S. dollars in 1975 to 785.8 billion dollars in 2024. Two-way investment stock has grown from nearly zero to 260 billion dollars. China and the EU are each other’s second-largest trading partners, with economic complementarity being a key feature of their cooperation.

    China-EU cooperation serves as a prime example of mutually beneficial cooperation in the era of economic globalization, despite differences in history, culture, social systems and development stages.

    Airbus illustrates this partnership well. Since entering the Chinese mainland market 40 years ago, the European aircraft manufacturer has seen its market share in China grow to more than 50 percent.

    In 2003, China and the EU established a comprehensive strategic partnership. They have established over 70 consultation and dialogue mechanisms that cover various fields such as politics, economy and trade, humanities, science and technology, energy, and the environment. Additionally, the two sides have increased cooperation in the areas of digital and green transition.

    Some valuable experience for comprehensive development includes the commitments to mutual respect, mutually beneficial cooperation, and free trade. These principles are the cornerstones of future China-EU ties, which is among the most influential relations worldwide.

    Fruitful China-EU cooperation has contributed to the development and progress of both sides, delivering tangible benefits for nearly two billion people in China and the EU, and greatly promoted world peace and development.

    However, in recent years, the bilateral relationship has faced difficulties and challenges, due to various frictions and differences on issues like trade. This has been particularly evident since the EU adopted a “partner-competitor-systemic rival” framework for characterizing bilateral relations in 2019. Some describe the EU’s positioning of China as akin to having all traffic lights (green, yellow and red) on at the same time. This approach not only fails to direct traffic, but will inevitably cause disruption.

    Chinese culture holds that complaining about others will not lead to self-improvement. Given the scale of bilateral trade and the growing competitiveness of some of China’s industries, it is natural for some differences and frictions to arise. Solutions lie in dialogue and consultation.

    The EU side has expressed concerns about its trade deficit with China. Yet, a thorough examination of the trade imbalance reveals that the situation is more complex than the deficit figure suggests. Three facts offer different perspectives. Firstly, the EU has long enjoyed a surplus in services trade with China. Secondly, it restricts the export of high-tech products to China. Thirdly, over one-third of exports from EU companies in China are sold to Europe, which means European companies get many of the benefits of the trade surplus.

    There is no fundamental conflict of interests between China and the EU, but rather extensive common interests. Greater benefits will only come from partnership rather than rivalry. Bilateral cooperation was not — and will never be — a zero-sum game. To truly understand China-EU relations, it is important to hold a long-term, strategic and comprehensive perspective.

    The world is currently experiencing significant turbulence and change. As China and the EU prepare for the next 50 years of cooperation, it is particularly important to reflect on and adhere to the original aspirations that guided the establishment of bilateral relations. This includes promoting values such as mutual benefit, solving problems through consultations, and opposing hegemony.

    By learning from the past, the 25th China-EU Summit on Thursday should rise above differences and pool consensus to open up a new chapter of bilateral relations. 

    MIL OSI China News

  • Trump strikes trade deal with Japan to cut tariffs

    Source: Government of India

    Source: Government of India (4)

    The United States and Japan struck a deal to lower the hefty tariffs President Donald Trump threatened to impose on goods from its Asian ally that included a pledge by Japan to invest $550 billion in the United States.

    The agreement – including a 15% tariff on all imported Japanese goods, down from a proposed 25% – is the most significant of the string of trade deals the White House has reached ahead of an approaching August 1 deadline for higher levies to kick in.

    “I just signed the largest TRADE DEAL in history with Japan,” Trump said on his Truth Social platform. “This is a very exciting time for the United States of America, and especially for the fact that we will continue to always have a great relationship with the Country of Japan.”

    Ishiba, who is facing political pressure after a bruising election defeat on Sunday, hailed the deal as “the lowest figure among countries that have a trade surplus with the U.S.”.

    The two sides also agreed to cut tariff 25% tariffs already imposed on Japanese autos to 15%, Ishiba said. Auto exports account for more than a quarter of Japan’s exports to the U.S.

    The announcement ignited a rally in Japanese stocks, with the benchmark Nikkei climbing 2.6% to its highest in a year. Shares of automakers surged in particular, with Toyota 7203.T up more than 11%, and Honda 7267.T and Nissan 7201.T both up more than 8%.

    The exuberance extended to shares of South Korean carmakers as well, as the Japan deal stoked optimism that South Korea could strike a comparable deal. The yen firmed slightly against the dollar, and U.S. equity index futures edged upward.

    But U.S. automakers signaled their unhappiness with the deal, raising concerns about a trade regime that could cut tariffs on auto imports from Japan to 15% while leaving tariffs on imports from Canada and Mexico at 25%.

    Matt Blunt, who heads the American Automotive Policy Council which represents General Motors GM.N Ford F.N and Chrysler-parent Stellantis STLAM.MI, said “any deal that charges a lower tariff for Japanese imports with virtually no U.S. content than the tariff imposed on North American-built vehicles with high U.S. content is a bad deal for U.S. industry and U.S. auto workers.”

    ‘MISSION COMPLETE’

    Autos are a huge part of U.S.-Japan trade, but almost all of it is one way to the U.S. from Japan, a fact that has long irked Trump. In 2024, the U.S. imported more than $55 billion of vehicles and automotive parts while just over $2 billion were sold into the Japanese market from the U.S.

    Two-way trade between the two countries totaled nearly $230 billion in 2024, with Japan running a trade surplus of nearly $70 billion. Japan is the fifth-largest U.S. trading partner in goods, U.S. Census Bureau data show.

    Trump’s announcement followed a meeting with Japan’s top tariff negotiator, Ryosei Akazawa, at the White House on Tuesday.

    “#Mission Complete,” Akazawa wrote on X.

    The deal was “a better outcome” for Japan than it potentially could have been, given Trump’s earlier unilateral tariff threats, said Kristina Clifton, a senior economist at the Commonwealth Bank of Australia in Sydney.

    “Steel, aluminium, and also cars are important exports for Japan, so it’ll be interesting to see if there’s any specific carve-outs for those,” Clifton said.

    Kazutaka Maeda, an economist at Meiji Yasuda Research Institute, said that “with the 15% tariff rate, I expect the Japanese economy to avoid recession.”

    Japan is the largest investor in the United States. Together with pension giant GPIF and Japanese insurers, the country has about $2 trillion invested in U.S. markets.

    Besides that, Bank of Japan data shows direct Japanese investment in the United States was $1.2 trillion at the end of 2024, and Japanese direct investment flows amounted to $137 billion in North America last year.

    Speaking later at the White House, Trump also expressed fresh optimism that Japan would form a joint venture with Washington to support a gas pipeline in Alaska long sought by his administration.

    “We concluded the one deal … and now we’re going to conclude another one because they’re forming a joint venture with us at, in Alaska, as you know, for the LNG,” Trump told lawmakers at the White House. “They’re all set to make that deal now.”

    Trump aides are feverishly working to close trade deals ahead of an August 1 deadline that Trump has repeatedly pushed back under pressure from markets and intense lobbying by industry. By that date, countries are set to face steep new tariffs beyond those Trump has already imposed since taking office in January.

    Trump has announced framework agreements with Britain, Vietnam, Indonesia and paused a tit-for-tat tariff battle with China, though details are still to be worked out with all of those countries.

    At the White House, Trump said negotiators from the European Union would be in Washington on Wednesday.

    -Reuters

  • MIL-OSI USA: Rep. Doggett Appointed to U.S. Helsinki Commission

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Lloyd Doggett (D-TX)

    Contact: Alexis Torres  

    Washington, D.C.—U.S. Representative Lloyd Doggett (D-Texas) announced his appointment to serve on the Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe, also known as the Helsinki Commission. Created in 1976, this independent U.S. Government agency monitors compliance and advancement of human rights, democracy, economic, environmental, and military cooperation in the 57-nation Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) region.

    “I am pleased to represent Austin, a vibrant international community, in an international organization founded upon the defense of human rights and fundamental freedoms. With an authoritarian president at home and so many troubling conflicts abroad, the Helsinki Commission offers me another forum for engaging with its mission of democracy promotion, international cooperation, and peaceful conflict resolution,” said Rep. Doggett.  “As some urge ‘go-it-alone’ and others promote isolationism, I believe our security can be assured only through collaboration with our allies and strong diplomacy with our adversaries.” 

    Throughout his career, Rep. Doggett has been a strong champion for the rule of law, international human rights, and peace. Previously, he led whip efforts against President George W. Bush’s disastrous invasion of Iraq, warning of the consequences of what would become the worst foreign policy decision in American history. He was a leader in House efforts to protect the Iran nuclear agreement, formally known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), which was successfully negotiated during the Obama administration, but later rejected by President Trump. His name is also on the first sanctions legislation against Russia following its invasion of Ukraine. The Congressman was also a frequent participant in previous Helsinki Commission events, such as its Parliamentary Assembly and an investigation of Russian war crimes conducted in the same historic Nuremberg, Germany courtroom in which Nazi war criminals were once convicted.

    Congress originally created the Helsinki Commission in response to dissidents in the Soviet Union and its Eastern European allies, who saw the Helsinki Final Act as a new opportunity to hold governments accountable for their human rights records. The end of the Cold War allowed the Commission to expand its commitment to new areas, such as free and fair elections, energy security and the environment, and combating corruption and terrorism. The Commission is currently chaired by Senator Roger Wicker (R-MS), Chair of the Senate Armed Services Committee. It also consists of members from the United States Senate and U.S. House of Representatives, as well as the Departments of State, Defense, and Commerce.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Reps. Doggett, Murphy Introduce Bipartisan Bill to Ensure Adequate Provider Payments under Medicare Advantage

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Lloyd Doggett (D-TX)

    Health systems are withdrawing from Medicare Advantage contracts due to inadequate and delayed payments

    Contact: Alexis Torres  

    Washington, D.C.—U.S. Representatives Lloyd Doggett (D-TX), Ranking Member of the Ways and Means Health Subcommittee, and Health Subcommittee member Greg Murphy, M.D. (R-NC) introduced bipartisan legislation to require Medicare Advantage (MA) to adequately reimburse health care providers for services offered to enrollees of these private plans. The Prompt and Fair Pay Act establishes a floor requiring MA plans to reimburse for all covered health care items and services at least what would have been paid under Medicare Parts A and B; plans and providers may continue to negotiate higher reimbursement rates. The legislation also establishes prompt payment rules for clean in-network claims, which are requirements that would mirror those under Medicare Part D. 

    “A rapidly growing Medicare DisAdvantage market is straining our health care system and threatening consumers’ access to necessary health care,” said Rep. Doggett. “Providers are having to choose between substantial reimbursement delays that are often less than what is truly owed, administrative burdens, and care denials, or an outright withdrawal from MA contracts. With many providers already at risk of closure and MA now covering more than half of enrollees, it is essential that we ensure prompt and fair payments before every community is a health care desert. Our bill is an important step to protect patients and providers.” 

    “Medicare Advantage was conceived with good intentions, but absent updates and reforms, insurers will continue to exploit and abuse the program to bilk the federal government at the expense of patients and physicians,” said  Congressman Greg Murphy, M.D. “Doctors who see MA beneficiaries not only experience major delays in reimbursement and senseless prior authorization denials, but often receive less compensation for services rendered than they earn through traditional Medicare. I am proud to support the Prompt and Fair Pay Act to guarantee parity between MA reimbursements and Medicare Parts A and B, ensure our physicians are treated with dignity, and preserve access to high-quality, affordable care for patients.”

    Although Traditional Medicare spending serves as the benchmark for MA payments, the law currently does not require MA plans to reimburse providers at the same rates. As a result, many hospitals, provider groups, and other health systems are operating in the red and are forced to withdraw from MA contracts. This year alone, 27 health systems have left the MA program. It’s also estimated that skilled nursing facilities lost $13.8 billion in 2024 because MA plans reimbursed significantly less than Traditional Medicare. Without Congress’s intervention, MA plans will continue to skirt an obligation to promptly and fairly pay providers. 

    Committed to a more just and equitable health care system for patients, providers and taxpayers, Reps. Doggett and Murphy have previously worked together to introduce legislation to strengthen veterans’ health care for those dually enrolled in MA and Medicare Part D plans. The members have also requested that the Government Accountability Office conduct an independent investigation into vertical consolidation of Medicare Advantage Organizations. 

    The Prompt and Fair Pay Act is endorsed by America’s Essential Hospitals, American Academy of Family Physicians, American College of Physicians, American Occupational Therapy Association, LeadingAge, National Rural Health Association, Premier, Texas Hospital Association, Texas Organization of Rural and Community Hospitals, Texas Association for Home Care and Hospice, and the American Association of Nurse Anesthesiology.

    “By establishing a payment floor for Medicare Advantage (MA) plans that aligns with amounts paid under traditional Medicare, the Prompt and Fair Pay Act helps ensure rural providers are not disadvantaged as MA enrollment continues to grow. The National Rural Health Association also appreciates the addition of enforceable prompt payment standards as rural providers often face administrative burdens to receiving timely payment from plans, creating cash flow issues. This bill marks an important step toward improving predictability and sustainability for rural health systems. NRHA thanks Rep. Doggett and Rep. Murphy for their thoughtful approach to addressing long-standing challenges rural providers face in the MA program and we are proud to endorse this legislation.” – Alan Morgan, CEO of National Rural Health Association

    Katie Smith Sloan, president and CEO, LeadingAge, the association of nonprofit providers of aging services, said: “To Congress and to regulators, we’ve repeatedly expressed concerns that Medicare Advantage plans, by underpaying and delaying provider reimbursement, are threatening the financial stability of our nonprofit and mission-driven provider members, which jeopardizes access to necessary care and services for older adults. This legislation, which establishes a rate floor and prompt payment requirements, is a vital step toward ensuring that providers are fairly and promptly compensated for the care they deliver. It will bring much-needed financial stability to our nursing homes and home health members–particularly those located in underserved and rural communities. We strongly support this legislation and urge its swift passage.”

    Bruce Siegel, MD, MPH, President and CEO of America’s Essential Hospitals, said: “Essential Hospitals across the nation are facing unprecedented financial disruptions, jeopardizing their ability to serve patients and their communities. The Prompt and Fair Pay Act is a step in the right direction, providing concrete steps to fix woefully inadequate hospital reimbursements. We will continue to support common sense legislation like this that aims to better sustain and support our hospitals, and the communities they serve.”

    “The AAFP thanks Rep. Doggett for leading on this legislative effort to establish fair payment standards and enforce timely payments from Medicare Advantage plans. This legislation will help ensure that family physicians can spend less time navigating red tape and more time delivering high-quality care. We’re encouraged by the inclusion of enforcement measures, which we hope will ensure accountability and compliance by plans and help protect the financial stability of practices and the health of our communities.” — Jen Brull, MD, FAAFP,  President, American Academy of Family Physicians

    Soumi Saha, PharmD, JD, Senior Vice President of Government Affairs, Premier, Inc., said: “Premier applauds Reps. Doggett and Murphy for their leadership in introducing the bipartisan Prompt and Fair Pay Act.  This bill will take important steps to ensure that all providers are paid in a timely and appropriate manner for the care they provide to Medicare Advantage patients. Premier has consistently voiced the need to align payment timelines and levels for in-network providers compared with out-of-network providers. Reps. Doggett and Murphy are taking meaningful action to hold insurers accountable and correct these existing inequities in a manner that will benefit patients and providers.”

    John Hawkins, President and CEO of Texas Hospital Association, said: “THA is grateful for the leadership of Congressman Lloyd Doggett to ensure hospitals are paid timely for care delivered to seniors covered by private insurance plans in the Medicare Advantage program. Non-partisan studies have repeatedly shown that excessive and unnecessary denials, slow pay tactics, overly stringent prior authorization requirements, and restrictive provider networks by these plans threaten access to medically necessary care. For years, Congressman Doggett has been working to address these challenges, and The Prompt and Fair Pay Act of 2025 will bring overdue accountability and prompt pay standards to the MA program.” 

    “Occupational therapy services are crucial to enable Medicare beneficiaries in either traditional Fee-for-Service or Medicare Advantage programs to recover and live as independently as possible after an injury or illness,” according toKatie Jordan, OTD, MBA, OTR/L, FAOTA, Chief Executive Officer, American Occupational Therapy Association (AOTA). She notes that “The Prompt and Fair Pay Act would ensure payment parity for OT services provided to beneficiaries in either program while also requiring prompt payment of clean claims and enhancing transparency from Medicare Advantage organizations regarding questioned claims.  This is critical to reduce the administrative burden related to processing claims which would allow a greater focus on actual patient treatment.” 

    “We appreciate Congressman Doggett’s leadership in introducing the Prompt and Fair Pay Act to ensure that Medicare Advantage plans are properly reimbursing practitioners for the care they provide,” said Jan Setnor, MSN, CRNA, Col. (Ret), USAFR, NC, President of the American Association of Nurse Anesthesiology. “This bill will ensure patients have access to nurse anesthetists and other providers and the high-quality care they deliver by holding payors accountable for proper and timely reimbursement of care. This bill will protect access to care for the growing number of Americans who utilize Medicare Advantage plans, and we strongly urge Congress to pass this critical legislation.” 

    “Medicare Advantage plans have been hard on rural Texas hospitals, so TORCH applauds the effort to require sustainable payments without delay.” –John Henderson, President/CEO of Texas Organization of Rural and Community Hospitals (TORCH)

    A fact sheet about the bill can be found here, and the full bill text here

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Chairman Williams Introduces the Equal Shot Act

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Roger Williams (25th District of Texas)

    WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, House Committee on Small Business Chairman Roger Williams (R-Texas) introduced the Equal Shot Act of 2025, a key piece of legislation aimed at ensuring fairness in federal small business policy. This bill prohibits the Small Business Administration (SBA) and its Administrator from discriminating against firearm-related businesses in the distribution of financial assistance.

    The Equal Shot Act of 2025 protects small business owners from politically motivated bias, defends Constitutional rights, and guarantees that businesses supporting the Second Amendment have the same access to federal resources as any other eligible enterprise.

    “Unelected officials should not have the power to discriminate against an entire industry based on political bias,”  said Chairman Williams. “Firearm-related businesses are owned and operated by hardworking Americans who follow the law, create jobs, and contribute to their communities. They shouldn’t be punished for their values. This bill stands up for their right to compete on a level playing field.”

    Click here to view the bill.

    Background:

    This bill comes as a response to concerns that, under the Biden Administration, federal agencies or financial institutions may have denied support or imposed restrictions on gun-related businesses for political or ideological reasons. This legislation aims to ensure that all eligible small businesses, regardless of industry, are treated fairly and without bias.

    This bill is supported by major advocacy organizations, including the National Rifle Association (NRA), Gun Owners of America (GOA), and the National Association for Gun Rights (NAGR).

    Original cosponsors include Reps. Jack Bergman (R-Michigan), Nick Langworthy (R-New York), Troy Downing (R-Montana), Jake Ellzey (R-Texas), Stephanie Bice (R-Oklahoma), Brandon Gill (R-Texas), Mike Collins (R-Georgia), Mark Alford (R-Missouri), Beth Van Duyne (R-Texas), Chuck Fleischmann (R-Tennessee), Tony Wied (R-Wisconsin), Scott Fitzgerald (R-Wisconsin), Sheri Biggs (R-South Carolina), Dan Crenshaw (R-Texas), Randy Weber (R-Texas), Anna Paulina Luna (R-Florida), Tim Walberg (R-Michigan), Mike Ezell (R-Mississippi), Tom Tiffany (R-Wisconsin), Claudia Tenney (R-New York), Steve Womack (R-Arkansas), and Michael A. Rulli (R-Ohio).

    Senator Jim Risch (R-Idaho) will lead the companion legislation in the Senate. 

    ###

    Congressman Roger Williams is the Chairman of the House Small Business Committee and member of the House Financial Services Committee. He proudly represents the 25th Congressional District of Texas.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Speech to the 2025 LGNZ Conference – Delivering for Ratepayers Together

    Source: New Zealand Government

    Introduction – Grounding in shared reality

    Thank you to LGNZ for the opportunity to speak today, and thank you to the mayors, chairs, and councillors in the room for putting your names forward to serve your communities.

    Right now, the cost of living is top of mind for every Kiwi: food, fuel, power, and, yes, rates. Households are stretched, and rate rises are a flashpoint for that understandable frustration.

    It is easy to point the finger in tense times, but I came here to point out a common cause. The Government and councils all want the same thing. Affordable, effective Local Government services for local communities.

    We recognise that depreciation has accumulated, and funding mechanisms are finite. Behind those rate rises are decades of pressure building: water systems that should have been renewed a generation ago, roads worn out faster than they’re maintained, and new housing demands without the means to service them.

    Central government blames councils. Councils blame government. The problem is blaming isn’t productive. New Zealanders don’t care whose fault it is – they want affordable and effective local government, too.

    The question is, how can we sharpen focus and raise productivity to do just that?

    Everyone’s under pressure, central government, local government and, most importantly, New Zealand taxpayers and ratepayers. The pressure households currently face mean that we cannot justify passing the bill to families who are already stretched. Inflation’s legacy is still biting. Families are tightening their belts. Government must do the same.

    From Wellington, we’ve worked hard to rein in spending, eliminating low-value activities. Households have done their part too, paying eye-watering mortgage rates and making sacrifices in their own budgets to make ends meet.

    These efforts have paid off. Households now see an overall consumer price inflation rate of 2.5%, down from a peak of 7.3% in 2022.

    We could be doing even better, but Stats NZ helpfully releases breakdowns of the drivers of inflation. And one figure practically screams out from the spreadsheet. Local authority rates and payments rose by 12.2% in the year to March. 12.2%, versus an overall rate of 2.5%.

    Clearly, local government is a key driver of cost pressure on households and, don’t forget, businesses that people rely on for goods, services, and jobs.

    In Wellington, we’re focusing on delivering services that only Government can deliver effectively and affordably. I believe local government should have the same focus, beginning with a clear conception of local government’s role.

    That is, what things must local government provide because private markets cannot? 

    To put it the way someone once said it to me: Roads, rats, rubbish and rates should be the focus. Horizontal infrastructure of new jobs and housing is a priority, too. Councils shouldn’t be pontificating on people’s four well beings. Your job is not to recreate Plato’s Republic here in the South Pacific. It’s to effectively provide a discrete bundle of goods at an affordable price.

    But we also recognise a hard truth: many of the costs facing councils aren’t of your own making.

    They’ve been baked into the system through decades of regulatory complexity. Layer upon layer of vague mandates, unclear responsibilities, and well-meaning rules that create more confusion than solutions.

    You’re stuck trying to deliver core services under rules that second-guess every decision and inflate every budget line.

    On overregulation: we hear you. We are pushing government back to basics but we’re also delivering a plan to make it easier for councils to reflect the needs of their communities.

    We’ve seen the so-called four well beings, introduced with good intentions, but resulted in asking councils to act as second-tier social ministries, expected to deliver on every issue, regardless of mandate, expertise, or funding.

    In 2017 I called the introduction of this legislation the Puppy Dogs and Ice Cream Bill. That’s because rather than requiring councils to deliver core services in a cost-effective way for households and businesses, the Government believed councils should be able to do whatever they felt like. That was always going to be a recipe for higher rates.

    And we’ve seen the proliferation of the RMA’s numerous processes and requirements turning councils into consultation machines.

    Add to that endless duplication across agencies, overlapping consents, decades of poor investment and management (and a Minister asking you to focus on attendance). We all need things to change.

    Councils are not only granters of resource consents, they are the biggest applicants, with much of council’s essential infrastructure hamstrung or cost inflated by the RMA.

    The Government’s resource management reforms tackle this head on. 

    Benchmarking will show ratepayers how the performance of their own council compares with others, in terms of rates, debt, and spending. Some healthy competition between councils is long overdue.

    We’re demanding discipline from councils, but we’re also committed to clearing away the red tape that constrains you. We’re scrapping the laws that confuse roles, inflate budgets, and justify the kind of spending Kiwis can’t afford.

    We’re rebuilding the system so councils can focus on the things only councils can do: represent their local communities, fix pipes, roads, rubbish, and infrastructure that unlocks growth and lowers costs.

    Back to basics isn’t a slogan. It’s a plan. And we’re going to deliver on it.

    A plan for councils and communities

    To cut costs, clear roadblocks, and put power back with communities there’s a clear blueprint:

    1. RMA reform – real change

    We are replacing the Resource Management Act aiming for a fundamental shift in how it works, because there’s no piece of legislation more detrimental to the cost of living than the RMA. 

    I’ve seen the details of resource consents for solar farms, which include requirements such as:

    • Inviting mana whenua to perform karakia before removing any native trees or plants from the site.
    • Providing written reports every six months until two years after construction is finished, outlining compliance with a 66-page Cultural Impact Assessment, with ongoing reporting beyond that.
    • Submitting a detailed landscaping plan specifying:
      • Every plant’s botanical and common name.
      • Exact location, spacing, and planter bag size.
      • Soil preparation methods and planting techniques.
      • The type and quality of materials like soil, mulch, stakes, and ties.
      • A requirement to replace any dead plant with the same or similar species at the same size.
      • Constructing a ‘public viewing area’ with off-street parking, and informational and educational signage. 

    This is what’s driving up power bills. You and your ratepayers want renewable energy but the consenting process demands ceremonial chanting and spreadsheet-level detail about every shrub on site. These two aims don’t compute.

    We see the same thing happening with supermarkets, IKEA, even hospitals. This madness raises prices at the checkout and on power bills.

    IKEA’s consent required inviting representatives of seven different mana whenua groups “to undertake cultural monitoring, karakia and other such cultural ceremonies on the site” at the pre-start meeting, commencement of earthworks and immediately prior to completion of bulk earthworks across the site, with ten days’ notice before each of those events. Ten working days, that can be two weeks of waiting for a construction site that wants to get cracking, more if you chuck a public holiday in the middle. IKEA must think us Kiwis really love affordable Swedish furniture for it to be worth their while. 

    That’s the problem though, for every IKEA there’ll be another organisation that just can’t get past the consenting, can’t hack the months of delays and paperwork. 

    Currently, and under the reforms of the last government, the RMA slows down housing, gums up roads and strangles infrastructure. It delays pipes. It creates years of delay for projects that ratepayers are already paying for.

    Under the new framework this government is working towards, councils will spend less time litigating, and more time building.

    National rules will be clear and local voice will be stronger, with less duplication and endless second-guessing.

    Infrastructure consents will be faster and more certain, especially for projects with regional importance.

    In short: fewer lawyers, more shovels.

    2. Regional Deals – Partnership, not payouts

    Second, we’re advancing a new model of Regional Deals. These are not handouts. They are contracts between central government and regions to deliver real outcomes in return for real reform.

    For years I championed the idea of genuine partnerships between central and local government to make sure important infrastructure actually gets built. The ACT/National Coalition Agreement committed to instituting long-term city and regional infrastructure deals, allowing PPPs, tolling and value capture rating to fund infrastructure.

    Deals will include:

    • New revenue tools for councils, but only where there’s discipline on costs and a plan to grow.
    • Dedicated infrastructure funding, where councils demonstrate delivery readiness, not just need.
    • Housing and economic growth acceleration, tied to streamlined consenting and local development strategies.

    And crucially, each deal must include measurable, transparent outcomes. Because Kiwis are done with blank cheques.

    It’s great to see negotiations underway on the first regional deals, and I hope to see the first deals announced by the end of the year.

    3. Encouraging investment so we can have nice things

    Many of you will be concerned about the cost of living for your ratepayers. I encourage you to save more, think about where you’re spending and prevent rates rises as much as possible. That’s what you can do. The Government is also looking to lower the cost of living by tackling one of the most stubborn costs out there. Groceries.

    Increased competition in the grocery sector is a win-win for councils. Ratepayers see cheaper prices at the checkout and regions see development that brings jobs and money to the area.

    Right now, outdated planning and consenting rules make it nearly impossible for new players to break into the market. I’ve suggested a possible way to fix that is through a fast-track grocery development process to clear the path for new entrants like Aldi, Walmart or local startups, to bring real competition to communities across New Zealand. 

    That means lower prices for ratepayers, but also new jobs, investment, and mixed-use developments that can revitalise town centres. It’s a win-win: Central Government gets out of the way, new businesses bring in the investment, and local councils and communities reap the rewards.

    Mindset shift – From finger pointing to problem solving

    None of this works if we go back to zero-sum thinking. That kind of mindset, the idea that central government only wins if local loses, or that councils are always to blame has failed New Zealand.

    It failed us with housing. It failed us with crime. It’s failing us with infrastructure.

    What works is recognising that our problems are shared and that the success of one level of government helps the other.

    When councils deliver better infrastructure, housing becomes more affordable.

    When central government cuts red tape, council costs come down.

    When both work together, communities thrive.

    This is the positive-sum mindset. And it’s what we need to get our country moving again.

    Conclusion – Delivering for New Zealanders, together

    So here’s the deal.

    We are repealing the four wellbeings and other vague mandates, not because they’re bad ideas, but because they’ve become an excuse to do everything and nothing.

    We are replacing them with a clear emphasis: focus on what only councils can do and do it brilliantly.

    We are reforming the RMA so you can build the pipes, roads, and housing New Zealand needs.

    We are putting Regional Deals on the table, tools that empower you, with accountability baked in.

    And we are asking every council to go line-by-line on spending, to say no to what’s nice-to-have, and deliver the basics at a price ratepayers can afford.

    That is how we rebuild trust.

    That is how we earn the right to ask Kiwis for more.

    And that is how, together, we can solve the problems of our communities, not by pointing fingers, but by rolling up our sleeves and getting to work.

    Thank you.

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Albanese Government introduces legislation to strengthen safety in child care centres

    Source: Murray Darling Basin Authority

    Today the Albanese Government introduced legislation to Parliament to lift child safety in early education and care services.

    This legislation will give the Commonwealth Government power to cut off funding to child care centres that don’t meet the National Quality Standard when it comes to safety and quality, where there’s a breach of the law, or where centres are acting in a way that puts the safety of children at risk.

    The legislation will also allow Commonwealth officers to perform spot-checks without warning to detect fraud and non-compliance across the sector.

    Governments, State and Federal, need to do more to ensure the safety of children. These new powers are part of that.

    They will be used in close collaboration with states and territories regulating quality and safety under the National Quality Framework.

    This is just one of a number of steps the Albanese Government is taking with the states and territories to protect children in early education and care.

    Speeding up work on a nationwide register of early educators will be on the agenda at the Education Ministers’ Meeting in August, as well as the role of CCTV in centres and mandatory child safety training for educators.

    The Attorney-General has also put reform of Working with Children Checks as the first item on the agenda for the Standing Council of Attorneys-General meeting next month. 

    Today’s legislation builds on the work the Albanese Government and state and territory governments have already done implementing the recommendations of the Australian Children’s Education and Care Quality Authority’s Child Safety Review. These include mandatory 24 hour reporting of any allegations, complaints or incidents of physical or sexual abuse, and restricting the use of personal mobile phones in centres.

    The highest priority of the Albanese Government is strengthening safety in early education and care to make sure our kids are safe.

    Quotes attributable to Minister for Education Jason Clare:

    “This legislation is not about shutting centres down, it’s about raising standards up.

    “This is about making sure the safety and quality in child care centres is what parents expect and children deserve.

    “We are determined to do what needs to be done to rebuild confidence in a system that parents need to have confidence in.

    “It’s a system that more than a million mums and dads rely on to care for and educate the most important people in their world – their children.”

    Quotes attributable to Minister for Early Childhood Education Dr Jess Walsh:

    “Every child deserves to be safe in their early learning centre and this legislation requires providers to put safety first.

    “The Australian Government is absolutely committed to ensuring that children have a positive, rewarding and safe early education experience to get the best possible start in life.”
     

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI: DMG Blockchain Solutions Announces Exploration of Digital Asset Treasury Strategy

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    VANCOUVER, British Columbia, July 22, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — DMG Blockchain Solutions Inc. (TSX-V: DMGI) (OTCQB: DMGGF) (FRANKFURT: 6AX) (“DMG” or the “Company”), a vertically integrated blockchain and data center technology company, today announces that it has engaged a consultant to assess and help implement institutional-grade treasury management within the regulated custody platform operated by its wholly owned subsidiary, Systemic Trust Company (“STC”). This platform would serve both DMG and STC’s clients by offering custody services. DMG is also assessing additional capabilities intended to further enhance treasury value.

    Digital asset treasuries have recently gained prominence for their ability to generate net asset value (NAV) premiums through active management, in contrast to exchange-traded funds (ETFs), which typically trade in line with the value of their underlying assets. DMG’s digital asset portfolio is currently composed solely of bitcoin, although the Company is considering the inclusion of other digital assets. To support the platform, DMG may utilize its existing bitcoin, add its proceeds from Bitcoin mining and/or raise capital to expand its treasury. As of the date of this press release, DMG is ranked #54 among Top Public Bitcoin Treasury Companies on BitcoinTreasuries.net.

    DMG’s CEO, Sheldon Bennett, commented, “Investors are moving beyond ETFs and HODLing. They want strategies that actively build digital asset value. At DMG, we control the entire stack – secure computing infrastructure, Bitcoin mining operations and our regulated custody platform. This integration delivers a solution that few can match. By leveraging our end-to-end platform, we can facilitate the creation and expansion of digital asset portfolios for ourselves and our clients.”

    About Systemic Trust Company Ltd.

    Systemic Trust is fully regulated under the Alberta Loans and Trust Corporations Act, ensuring client digital assets are managed with the highest standards of compliance and security. Systemic Trust combines regulatory compliance, cutting-edge technology and robust insurance coverage to deliver the ultimate digital asset custody experience.

    About DMG Blockchain Solutions Inc.

    DMG is a publicly traded and vertically integrated blockchain and data center technology company that manages, operates and develops end-to-end digital solutions to monetize the digital asset and artificial intelligence compute ecosystems. Systemic Trust Company, a wholly owned subsidiary of DMG, is an integral component of DMG’s carbon-neutral Bitcoin ecosystem, which enables financial institutions to move Bitcoin in a sustainable and regulatory-compliant manner.

    For additional information about DMG Blockchain Solutions and its initiatives, please visit www.dmgblockchain.com. Follow @dmgblockchain on X, LinkedIn and Facebook, and subscribe to the DMG YouTube channel to stay updated with the latest developments and insights.

    For further information, please contact:

    On behalf of the Board of Directors,

    Sheldon Bennett, CEO & Director
    Tel: +1 (778) 300-5406
    Email: investors@dmgblockchain.com
    Web: www.dmgblockchain.com

    For Investor Relations:
    investors@dmgblockchain.com

    For Media Inquiries:
    Chantelle Borrelli
    Head of Communications
    chantelle@dmgblockchain.com

    Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Service Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this news release.

    Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Information

    This news release contains forward-looking information or statements based on current expectations. Forward-looking statements contained in this news release include statements regarding DMG’s strategies and plans, assessing and implementing institutional-grade treasury management features within the regulated custody platform operated by its wholly owned subsidiary, Systemic Trust Company, the consideration of the inclusion of other digital assets in treasury management, securing new clients for the Systemic Trust digital asset custody subsidiary, the opportunity and plans to monetize bitcoin transactions and provide additional products and services to customers and users, the continued investment in Bitcoin network software infrastructure and applications, the expected allocation of capital, developing and executing on the Company’s products and services, increasing self-mining, increasing hashrate, efforts to improve the operation of its mining fleet, the launch of products and services, events, courses of action, and the potential of the Company’s technology and operations, among others, are all forward-looking information.

    Future changes in the Bitcoin network-wide mining difficulty rate or Bitcoin hashrate may materially affect the future performance of DMG’s production of bitcoin, and future operating results could also be materially affected by the price of bitcoin and an increase in hashrate mining difficulty.

    Forward-looking statements consist of statements that are not purely historical, including any statements regarding beliefs, plans, expectations, or intentions regarding the future. Such information can generally be identified by the use of forwarding-looking wording such as “may”, “expect”, “estimate”, “anticipate”, “intend”, “believe” and “continue” or the negative thereof or similar variations. The reader is cautioned that assumptions used in the preparation of any forward-looking information may prove to be incorrect. Events or circumstances may cause actual results to differ materially from those predicted, as a result of numerous known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors, many of which are beyond the control of the Company, including but not limited to, market and other conditions, volatility in the trading price of the common shares of the Company, business, economic and capital market conditions; the ability to manage operating expenses, which may adversely affect the Company’s financial condition; the ability to remain competitive as other better financed competitors develop and release competitive products; regulatory uncertainties; access to equipment; market conditions and the demand and pricing for products; the demand and pricing of bitcoin; the demand and pricing of AI data centers and usage; security threats, including a loss/theft of DMG’s bitcoin; DMG’s relationships with its customers, distributors and business partners; the inability to add more power to DMG’s facilities; DMG’s ability to successfully define, design and release new products in a timely manner that meet customers’ needs; the ability to attract, retain and motivate qualified personnel; competition in the industry; the impact of technology changes on the products and industry; failure to develop new and innovative products; the ability to successfully maintain and enforce our intellectual property rights and defend third-party claims of infringement of their intellectual property rights; the impact of intellectual property litigation that could materially and adversely affect the business; the ability to manage working capital; and the dependence on key personnel. DMG may not actually achieve its plans, projections, or expectations. Such statements and information are based on numerous assumptions regarding present and future business strategies and the environment in which the Company will operate in the future, including the demand for its products, the ability to successfully develop software, that there will be no regulation or law that will prevent the Company from operating its business, anticipated costs, the ability to secure sufficient capital to complete its business plans, the ability to achieve goals and the price of bitcoin. Given these risks, uncertainties, and assumptions, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. The securities of DMG are considered highly speculative due to the nature of DMG’s business. For further information concerning these and other risks and uncertainties, refer to the Company’s filings on www.sedarplus.ca. In addition, DMG’s past financial performance may not be a reliable indicator of future performance.

    Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in forward-looking statements include, failure to obtain regulatory approval, the continued availability of capital and financing, equipment and/or infrastructure failures, lack of supply of equipment, power and infrastructure, failure to obtain any permits required to operate the business, the impact of technology changes on the industry, the impact of viruses and diseases on the Company’s ability to operate, secure equipment, and hire personnel, competition, security threats including stolen bitcoin from DMG or its customers, consumer sentiment towards DMG’s products, services and blockchain and AI technology generally, failure to develop new and innovative products, litigation, adverse weather or climate events, increase in operating costs, increase in equipment and labor costs, equipment failures, decrease in the price of Bitcoin, failure of counterparties to perform their contractual obligations, government regulations, loss of key employees and consultants, and general economic, market or business conditions. Forward-looking statements contained in this news release are expressly qualified by this cautionary statement. The reader is cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking information. The forward-looking statements contained in this news release are made as of the date of this news release. Except as required by law, the Company disclaims any intention and assumes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise. Additionally, the Company undertakes no obligation to comment on the expectations of or statements made by third parties in respect of the matters discussed above.

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-Evening Report: ER Report: A Roundup of Significant Articles on EveningReport.nz for July 23, 2025

    ER Report: Here is a summary of significant articles published on EveningReport.nz on July 23, 2025.

    Hard labour conditions of online moderators directly affect how well the internet is policed – new study
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Tania Chatterjee, Joint PhD Candidate at Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi, The University of Queensland Getty Images/GCShutter Big tech platforms often present content moderation as a seamless, tech‑driven system. But human labour, often outsourced to countries such as India and the Philippines, plays a pivotal role in

    Ghosted by a friend? 4 expert tips on how to handle the hurt
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Megan Willis, Associate Professor, School of Behavioural and Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University martin-dm/Getty When we talk about “ghosting”, we usually think it relates to dating. But what happens when you’ve been ghosted by someone you’ve known for years – your childhood best friend, a parent, a

    Labor’s new bill would cut HELP loans by 20%. But it also risks locking some graduates into a ‘debt treadmill’
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Andrew Norton, Professor of Higher Education Policy, Monash University The Albanese government’s 20% cut to student debt is the first bill introduced to the new federal parliament. It is clever politics. In the government’s first term, the 3 million Australians with a student debt turned high indexation

    ICJ climate crisis ruling: Will world’s top court back Pacific-led call to hold governments accountable?
    By Jamie Tahana in The Hague for RNZ Pacific In 2019, a group of law students at the University of the South Pacific, frustrated at the slow pace with which the world’s governments were moving to address the climate crisis, had an idea — they would take the world’s governments to court. They arranged a

    ‘Maybe this is the last minutes you are living’: how the war is impacting young Ukrainians
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Ashley Humphrey, Lecturer in Social Sciences, Monash University Now into its fourth year, the war that followed Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has taken a devastating toll. An estimated 60,000 to 100,0000 Ukrainian lives have been lost and more than 10 million citizens displaced, and entire cities have

    Auckland is NZ’s ‘primate city’ but its potential remains caged in by poor planning and vision
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Timothy Welch, Senior Lecturer in Urban Planning, University of Auckland, Waipapa Taumata Rau Getty Images The recent report comparing Auckland to nine international peer cities delivered an uncomfortable truth: our largest city is falling behind, hampered by car dependency, low-density housing and “weak economic performance”. The Deloitte

    Climate disasters are pushing people into homelessness – but there’s a lot we can do about it
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Timothy Heffernan, Lecturer in Anthropology, Australian National University Almost half of all Australian properties are at risk of bushfire, while 17,500 face risk of coastal erosion. By 2030, more than 3 million will face riverine flood risk. Meanwhile, housing demand continues to outpace supply. With climate-related disasters

    UK bans Gaza protest group – could the same thing happen in Australia?
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Shannon Bosch, Associate Professor (Law), Edith Cowan University More than 100 people were arrested in the United Kingdom on the weekend for supporting Palestine Action, a protest group that opposes Britain’s support of Israel. Palestine Action was recently proscribed as a terrorist organisation, placing it in the

    The incredible impact of Ozzy Osbourne, from Black Sabbath to Ozzfest to 30 years of retirement tours
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Lachlan Goold, Senior Lecturer in Contemporary Music, University of the Sunshine Coast Ozzy Osbourne photographed in London in 1991. Martyn Goodacre/Getty Images Ozzy Osbourne, the “prince of darkness” and godfather of heavy metal, has died aged 76, just weeks after he reunited with Black Sabbath bandmates for

    Could the latest ‘interstellar comet’ be an alien probe? Why spotting cosmic visitors is harder than you think
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Sara Webb, Lecturer, Centre for Astrophysics and Supercomputing, Swinburne University of Technology Comet 3I/ATLAS International Gemini Observatory/NOIRLab/NSF/AURA/K. Meech/Jen Miller/Mahdi Zamani, CC BY On July 1, astronomers spotted an unusual high-speed object zooming towards the Sun. Dubbed 3I/ATLAS, the surprising space traveller had one very special quality: its

    Should Australia lower the voting age to 16 like the UK? We asked 5 experts
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Pandanus Petter, Postdoctoral Research Fellow, School of Politics and International Relations, Australian National University The government in the UK is introducing legislation into parliament to lower the voting age to 16. If passed, the new age rules will be in place for the next general election, expected

    Doctors shouldn’t be allowed to object to medical care if it harms their patients
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Julian Savulescu, Visiting Professor in Biomedical Ethics, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute; Distinguished Visiting Professor in Law, University of Melbourne; Uehiro Chair in Practical Ethics, The University of Melbourne HRAUN/Getty A young woman needs an abortion and the reasons, while urgent, are not medical. A United States Navy

    Ultra fast fashion could be taxed to oblivion in France. Could Australia follow suit?
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Rowena Maguire, Professor of Law and Director of the Centre of Justice, Queensland University of Technology Ryan McVay/Getty For centuries, clothes were hard to produce and expensive. People wore them as long as possible. But manufacturing advances have steadily driven down the cost of production. These days,

    Central bank independence and credibility matters. Here’s why
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By John Simon, Adjunct Fellow in Economics, Macquarie University Olga Kashubin/Shutterstock In the United States, President Donald Trump has been pressuring the chairman of the US Federal Reserve, Jerome Powell, to slash interest rates. This is partly to ease the interest payments on the ballooning US government debt.

    Kneecap’s stance on Gaza extends a long history of the Irish supporting other oppressed peoples
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Ciara Smart, PhD Graduand in Australasian Irish History, University of Tasmania Love them or hate them, there’s no doubt Irish hip-hop trio Kneecap are having a moment. Their music – delivered in a powerful fusion of English and Irish – is known for its gritty lyrics about

    Do countries have a duty to prevent climate harm? The world’s highest court is about to answer this crucial question
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Nathan Cooper, Associate Professor of Law, University of Waikato Getty Images The International Court of Justice (ICJ) will issue a highly anticipated advisory opinion overnight to clarify state obligations related to climate change. It will answer two urgent questions: what are the obligations of states under international

    Gaza not a religious issue – it’s a massive violation of international law, say accord critics
    Asia Pacific Report Groups that have declined to join the government-sponsored “harmony accord” signed yesterday by some Muslim and Jewish groups, say that the proposed new council is “misaligned” with its aims. The signed accord was presented at Government House in Auckland. About 70 people attended, including representatives of the New Zealand Jewish Council, His

    Flying the flags for Palestine – NZ protesters take message to Devonport
    The Devonport Flagstaff About 200 people marched in Devonport last Saturday in support of Palestine. Pro-Palestine flags and placards were draped on the band rotunda at Windsor Reserve as speakers, including Green Party co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick and the people power manager of Amnesty International Aotearoa New Zealand Margaret Taylor, a Devonport local, encouraged the crowd

    View from The Hill: How much can Jim Chalmers get out of the economic reform roundtable?
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra We’re now less than a month away from the start of the Albanese government’s “economic reform” (aka “productivity”) roundtable, but it has become quite hard to get a fix on exactly what this gathering will amount to. The guest list

    Israeli settlers beat to death 2 Palestinians in latest lynchings
    BEARING WITNESS: By Cole Martin in occupied West Bank Two young Palestinians were beaten to death on their land by Israeli settlers in the occupied West Bank on Friday. A funeral was held on Sunday for Sayfollah “Saif” Mussalet, 20, and Muhammad Shalabi, 23, who were brutally killed by a large group of settlers in

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI USA: 07.22.2025 Sen. Cruz Introduces Bill Targeting NGOs and Adversaries Funding Violent Riots

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Texas Ted Cruz
    WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and colleagues introduced the Stop Financial Underwriting of Nefarious Demonstrations and Extremist Riots (Stop FUNDERs) Act. This bill adds rioting, as defined by the federal anti-riot statute, to the list of RICO predicate offenses, allowing the Department of Justice to use the full suite of RICO tools against entities who fund or coordinate violent interstate riots.
    Sen. Cruz said, “Every American has the right to freedom of speech and peaceful protest, but not to commit violence. Domestic NGOs and foreign adversaries fund and use riots in the United States to undermine the security and prosperity of Americans. My legislation will give the Department of Justice the tools it needs to hold them accountable, and I urge colleagues to pass it expeditiously.”
    The bill is cosponsored by Sens. John Cornyn (R-Texas), Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.), Bill Hagerty (R-Tenn.), Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), Mike Lee (R-Utah), and Josh Hawley (R- Mo.).
    Sen. Cornyn said, “Radical, left-wing groups who fund acts of violence, coordinate attacks against law enforcement, and spearhead the destruction of property must be stopped. This legislation would add rioting to the list of racketeering offenses to crack down on this lawless behavior while ensuring the First Amendment rights of free speech and peaceful protest are protected.”
    Sen. Tuberville said, “77 million Americans voted for President Trump and his America First policy agenda – and that includes arresting and deporting illegal aliens. Democrats don’t like that – so they are rioting in the streets and violently attacking law enforcement officers. This cannot stand. My colleagues and I are introducing a bill to make sure the Department of Justice has the tools it needs to go after anti-American terrorist groups and their funders who are protecting illegal rapists, murderers, and criminals. We have to cut these violent riots off at the source. The adults are back in charge, and law and order will prevail.”
    Sen. Hagerty said, “From anti-Semitic riots to violent anti-ICE attacks, those who fund and coordinate violent riots across our country must be held accountable. The Stop FUNDERs Act will give the Department of Justice the tools it needs to bring those facilitating and financing violence on our campuses and in our streets to account.”
    Sen. Tillis said, “Organized riots like those in Los Angeles pose a serious threat to public safety, endanger law enforcement, and undermine the rule of law. The Stop FUNDERs Act gives the Department of Justice the tools to go after the individuals and organizations that fund and orchestrate violent riots across our country. I’m proud to support this legislation to hold these bad actors accountable and restore law and order in our communities.”
    Companion legislation was introduced in the House by Rep. Beth Van Duyne (R-Texas-24).
    Rep. Van Duyne said, “The standard of treating violent, extremist activists as individual criminals must end. It is time we empower our law enforcement with a commonsense tool to treat these violent mobs, their funding sources, and their organizers as the criminal enterprises they are by passing the Stop FUNDERS Act. Since the days of the George Floyd riots, to the violence we see across American cities and college campuses today, it is obvious there are well funded, well outfitted, and highly coordinated efforts to plan and execute violent and potentially deadly missions of chaos and mayhem. This is organized crime, and we need to attack it as such.”
    This bill is supported by Heritage Action and National Right to Work Committee.
    Read the full text of the bill here.
    BACKGROUND
    The Stop FUNDERs Act will:
    Amend 18 U.S.C. § 1961(1) to add “rioting,” as defined in the Anti-Riot Act, to the list of racketeering predicate offenses.
    Enable the Department of Justice to use RICO tools—including joint liability and group prosecution, conspiracy charges, asset forfeiture, and enhanced criminal penalties—against organizations and individuals who repeatedly fund or coordinate violent interstate riots.
    Deter abuse of nonprofit status and expose hidden financial pipelines behind politically motivated violence.

    MIL OSI USA News