Category: Politics

  • MIL-OSI China: Macao comedy festival launches platform for emerging talent

    Source: China State Council Information Office 3

    A new comedy competition forum that connects emerging talent with investors debuted Friday at the Macao International Comedy Festival.

    A photo captures a scene from the stage play “I’m Your Father” at a comedy pitch event during the second Macao International Comedy Festival in Hengqin, Guangdong province, April 11, 2025. [Photo courtesy of Mahua Fun Age]

    The New Talents: Comedy Venture Capital Forum is China’s first platform where comedy screenwriters can pitch their work to potential investors through stage performances. 

    Held in Hengqin, a district of Zhuhai city in Guangdong province adjacent to Macao, the event featured directors Feng Xiaogang and Xu Zheng and comedy stars Shen Teng and Ma Li as judges. The forum aims to help emerging comedians secure funding, gain access to industry resources and find creative collaborators, helping transform their script ideas into marketable productions.

    The competition drew more than 300 original stage play submissions across genres from urban comedy to absurdist theater and dark humor. After selection and development, six finalists presented their scripts through immersive performances.

    The program also included an artificial intelligence component, with organizers saying AI helped screenwriters find inspiration and explore new approaches to comedy.

    A photo captures a scene from the stage play “Home, Friends and Whiskey” at a comedy pitch event during the second Macao International Comedy Festival in Hengqin, Guangdong province, April 11, 2025. [Photo courtesy of Mahua Fun Age]

    Playwright Ji Yun’s “I’m Your Father” won the top story and best incubation awards following performances and deliberations by the judges. Liang Yubao’s “The Laughing Grandpa” received the jury’s special award, while Sang Kezhou’s “Home, Friends and Whiskey” earned the most potential prize. Guan Xin and Qu Mufei’s “Seize the Flight” took home the best creativity award.

    “Comedy should mirror everyday experiences,” Ji said during his acceptance. “By articulating what audiences feel but can’t express, we find boundless creativity. Our art must both originate from and return to the people.”

    Director Xu Zheng, one of the four judges, shared his vision at the awards ceremony: “I want to see greater diversity in comedy. May more comedic works flourish across all cultures and contexts.”

    Filmmakers Feng Xiaogang, Xu Zheng and comedy stars Shen Teng and Ma Li serve as judges at a comedy pitch event during the second Macao International Comedy Festival in Hengqin, Guangdong province, April 11, 2025. [Photo courtesy of Mahua Fun Age]

    The second Macao International Comedy Festival runs through Sunday across Hengqin and Macao, featuring comedians, film screenings, performances, forums and an evening gala.

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: New EVs join government fleet

    Source: Northern Territory Police and Fire Services

    Electric vehicles take advantage of the ACT’s 100 per cent renewable electricity supply to help reduce emissions from transport.

    In brief:

    • The ACT Government has added 10 more electric vehicles to its fleet.
    • Electric vehicles are better for the environment and cheaper to run.
    • Making your next car electric could save you money.

    Canberra continues to lead the nation in supporting the uptake of electric vehicles (EVs).

    About 10 new electric vehicles are coming onto ACT roads every day. In fact, you might spot a few new ACT Government EVs out and about this spring, including:

    • a ute
    • two tipper trucks
    • a litter picking truck
    • a delivery van.

    These vehicles will join the City Services fleet as a trial to see how the ACT Government can continue to provide essential services in a more environmentally friendly way. An additional four electric passenger vehicles have also joined the fleet in the past month. These vehicles join more than 400 electric, plug-in hybrid or hydrogen fuel cell vehicles already in the ACT Government fleet.

    The trial will showcase the variety and availability of EVs for commercial use and promote their benefits to local industry and community. The new vehicles have been funded through the ACT Government’s Social Cost of Carbon Fund and Zero Emission Government Fund. These funds aim to reduce emissions produced by government activity.

    Making the switch

    Zero emission vehicles, like EVs, are better for the environment and quieter than petrol and diesel vehicles. They’re also much more affordable to run.

    Making your next car electric could save you around $18,000 in running costs over 10 years. It could also reduce your greenhouse gas emissions by around 3 tonnes per year.

    The ACT Government offers multiple incentives for people and businesses when they purchase an EV. And with new public chargers being installed all over the city, charging your EV is quick and easy.

    Canberran’s are embracing EVs at a rapid pace, with over 9,100 EVs currently registered. If you’re thinking about making your next car electric, but not sure where to start, check out this handy guide on EVs for beginners.

    Transport contributes over 60 per cent of the ACT’s emissions. This means electric vehicles have the potential to make a big difference as the ACT continues towards our goals of net zero emissions by 2045.

    For more information about zero emissions vehicles in the ACT, visit the Everyday Climate Choices website.


    Get ACT news and events delivered straight to your inbox, sign up to our email newsletter:


    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Canberra’s best pastries, as voted by you

    Source: Northern Territory Police and Fire Services

    Almond, chocolate or plain? Canberrans have plenty of options when it comes to croissants and other pastries. Image: VisitCanberra


    In Brief:

    • We asked Canberrans on the @weareCBR Instagram account to name their favourite local pastry spot.
    • This list includes cafés, pâtisseries and bakeries around Canberra.

    Whether it’s a croissant for breakfast, a box of Danishes for the office morning tea or a mid-afternoon sweet treat, Canberran’s can’t get enough pastries.

    Here are the results:

    The scent of baked bread will lure you into this bakery tucked away at Fyshwick Markets. Inside, you’ll find a pastry counter heaving with fruit Danishes, croissants, Italian cream-filled donuts, Portuguese tarts and more.

    Wildflour sell a range of different pastries, but they’re most well-known for their croissants. Ube, matcha, pistachio, salted caramel, Biscoff, black tea and mango are just some of the flavours that they’ve featured on their ever-changing menu.

    Knead has the feel of a traditional bakery, offering all of the classic pastries. There are croissants, seasonal frangipanes, Portuguese tarts and fruit Danishes. But you’ll also find surprises, like brookies (a brownie cookie hybrid) and a cracking crème brulee tart.

    This small but mighty bakery at Curtin shops has the feel of a traditional suburban bakery. Their hearty, flavourful savoury pies are a favourite among Woden residents.

    This is not your traditional bakery – unless you’ve recently arrived from the Mediterranean. You’ll find traditional, chocolate and almond croissants alongside Turkish sweet pastries and Borek.

    French-influenced pastries are the star at this bakery. You’ll find croissants, cinnamon buns, Danishes, escargot and more.

    Le Bon Mélange make just about every baked good under the sun – and pastries are no exception. You’ll find a huge variety of both sweet and savoury options.

    Locals queue at this suburb gem to stock up on pastries. There’s cardamon buns, greens and cheese escargots, kouign-amanns, croissants, seasonal pastries and more.

    Danishes, scrolls, cruffins, croissants – this family-run bakery offers an impressive lineup of pastries. With a Lyneham location opening soon, more Inner North residents will be able to get their Bakehouse fix.

    Located on Beltana Road, this bakery offers a range of fresh pastries to fuel your Pialligo adventures. Choose from croissants, pain au chocolat, escargot, cinnamon buns, Danishes, cruffins and more.

    It’s hard to walk by the pastry counter at Tinker Tailor without treating yourself to a golden, flaky pastry. Danishes, croissants and scrolls are some of the delights regularly on offer.

    Three Mills not only have five locations across the city, but you can purchase their goods at shops and cafés around town. One taste of their delicious pastries and it’s easy to see why. There’s a big selection of fresh pastries and even bake at home packs.

    L’epi Artisan Bakery, Chisholm and Kambah

    This French-inspired artisan bakery has a large selection of classic and unique freshly baked pastries. Try a Moorish custard Danish or indulge in a crookie (that’s a croissant with cookie dough, for the uninitiated).

    From their cultured butter croissant to their flaky morning buns, locals love pastries from Sonoma. You’ll often have to queue to secure a sweet treat, but rest assured that every moment is worth it.

    Sometimes, only a classic will do. Dobinsons has been serving Canberra since 1994 and have earned a reputation for delicious sweet and savoury pastries. Crispy spinach and feta triangles, fruit tarts heaving with shiny fruit and the decadent Nutella Danish are some of the crowd favourites.

    It’s little surprise that this bakery, run by French bakers, make an excellent croissant. They also infuse their baked goods with seasonal flair, offering specials like peanut butter, fresh apple and coconut pastries or mandarin and chocolate croissants.

    Located inside Manuka Court, this little pâtisserie offers a taste of Europe to the inner south. Chef Wim is Dutch, but trained in France, so you’ll find Dutch boterkoek (butter cake with fruit and nuts) alongside croissants and Belgian chocolate custard twists.

    Over the years, Silo has earnt a cult following in the Canberra community. As a result, you may need to jostle your way to the front of the cue for a pastry, but it’s all part of the charm. You’ll find the counter stocked with a stunning lineup of sweet and savoury pastries that will keep you coming back for more.

    This bakery is worth the trip to Fyshwick for fresh pastries. If you’d rather not make the journey, the Cedar Husk truck makes its way around Canberra delivering to baked goods to people’s homes. Follow them on Facebook to see when they’re coming to your area.

    Prefer your morning pastry with a side of spectacular views? The Café at the Arboretum is in the Village Centre. Take a seat and soak up the views or order takeaway and enjoy a picnic among the trees.

    Good Neighbour is one of the newest additions to Kingston’s café scene. Alongside their basque cheesecake and New York style chunky cookies, you’ll find a selection of fresh pastries available at the front counter.

    Lilette, Dickson

    This artisanal French pâtisserie made the move from Melbourne to Dickson earlier in the year. Chef Lilette bakes all your French favourites, from eclairs to croissants and tarts.

    Read more like this:


    Get ACT news and events delivered straight to your inbox, sign up to our email newsletter:


    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI China: China conducts nuclear security drill in eastern province

    Source: China State Council Information Office 2

    Aerial photo taken on Jan. 30, 2021 shows a view of Fujian Fuqing Nuclear Power Co., Ltd., a subsidiary of the China National Nuclear Corporation (CNNC), in Fuqing, east China’s Fujian Province. [Photo/Xinhua]
    China carried out a successful nuclear security exercise at the Fuqing nuclear power base in the country’s eastern Fujian Province on Saturday, according to the China Atomic Energy Authority (CAEA).
    The exercise, codenamed “Storm-2025,” was organized by the CAEA, the Ministry of Public Security and multiple other government departments. Participants included the Ministry of Ecology and Environment, the National Energy Administration and the local Fujian government.
    It was the sixth iteration of a biennial exercise and verified the emergency response capabilities of China’s nuclear facilities in extreme emergencies by simulating intrusions and attacks under different scenarios. It aimed to improve risk awareness among operators of nuclear facilities.
    The drill reinforced China’s commitment to balancing the safety and development of the nuclear industry, according to the CAEA.

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-Evening Report: ER Report: A Roundup of Significant Articles on EveningReport.nz for April 13, 2025

    ER Report: Here is a summary of significant articles published on EveningReport.nz on April 13, 2025.

    ‘Trump fatigue’ is putting Kiwis off the news, with trust in media still low – new report
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Merja Myllylahti, Senior Lecturer, Co-Director Research Centre for Journalism, Media & Democracy, Auckland University of Technology Getty Images The news media is doing its best to keep everyone up to speed with the pace of Donald Trump’s radical changes to the world order. But in Aotearoa New

    Health workers call for NZ government to join global demands for ambulance massacre inquiry
    Asia Pacific Report Health workers spoke out at a rally condemning Israel’s genocide in Gaza and the latest atrocity against Palestinian aid workers today, calling on the New Zealand government to join global demands for an independent investigation. They were protesting over last month’s massacre of 15 Palestinian rescue workers and the destruction of their

    Albanese pitches to aspiring home buyers with $10 billion plan and removal of means test on deposit guarantee
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra Anthony Albanese will promise a $10 billion scheme to facilitate the building of up to 100,000 homes that would be earmarked for sale to first home buyers. To be unveiled at Labor’s formal campaign launch in Perth on Sunday, the

    Dutton to offer targeted income tax offset of up to $1,200
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra Peter Dutton at his party launch on Sunday will offer a “cost of living tax offset” of up to $1,200 to more than 10 million taxpayers. The one-off offset would go to taxpayers earning up to $144,000 when they lodged

    Caitlin Johnstone: Israel’s innocent oopsie-poopsie medical massacre mistake
    Report by Dr David Robie – Café Pacific. – COMMENTARY: By Caitlin Johnstone The Israeli military changed its story many times about why its forces killed 15 medical workers and then buried them and their vehicles to hide the evidence. After their initial claim that the medical vehicles were approaching “suspiciously” without their emergency lights

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI USA: Smucker Leads Bipartisan Group Supporting Medicare Enrollment Protection Act

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Representative Lloyd Smucker (PA-16)

    WASHINGTON – U.S. Representatives Lloyd Smucker (PA-11), Angie Craig, Gus Bilirakis (FL-12), Mike Thompson (CA-05), Erin Houchin (IN-09), and Donald Norcross (NJ-01) have introduced the Medicare Enrollment Protection Act. This bipartisan legislation aims to protect seniors who enroll in Medicare Part B after their COBRA coverage ends from potential coverage gaps and late enrollment penalties.

    Under current law, all seniors must enroll in Medicare Part B within three months of turning 65. Seniors who continue working past 65 and maintain employer-sponsored coverage are granted an exception. However, COBRA continuation coverage does not qualify for this exemption.

    As a result, seniors who choose to extend their coverage through COBRA instead of enrolling in Medicare are subject to waiting periods of up to a year before they can begin receiving coverage and risk a lifetime of increased Part B premiums and other financial penalties.

    The Medicare Enrollment Protection Act seeks to close this loophole by creating a transition period that would allow seniors on COBRA to enroll in Part B during any month they have active COBRA coverage. As long as they enroll in Medicare Part B before their COBRA coverage ends, they would not be subject to a permanent late enrollment penalty.

    “This legislation is a commonsense effort to make health care more affordable for American seniors by providing a transition period before Medicare late enrollment penalties are applied,” Rep. Smucker said. “Seniors should be able to make their own choices and enroll in Medicare at an age that makes sense for themselves, not one set by the federal government. I have been fighting for this change to make the enrollment process easier since coming to Congress. I will work to secure support from my colleagues on both sides of the aisle, and look forward to this bill’s passage.”

    “Seniors shouldn’t be penalized for keeping their existing health coverage before enrolling in Medicare,” said Rep. Erin Houchin (IN-09). “The Medicare Enrollment Protection Act is a commonsense solution that protects seniors from unexpected penalties and ensures they have the flexibility and peace of mind they deserve.”

    “Medicare has provided care to millions of seniors and people with disabilities for decades. Protecting access to this program is vital to ensure they continue to receive the care they need,” said Rep. Thompson. “The bipartisan Medicare Enrollment Protection Act will help Americans enroll in Medicare and work to ensure beneficiaries are not faced with unexpected expensive penalties. I’m pleased to join my colleagues to protect access to Medicare for those who depend on this program.”

    “We want to ensure the transition from private health care to Medicare is easy,” said Congressman Bilirakis. “The current law does not meet that objective. Additionally, the law does not properly reflect the need for flexibility due to the various challenges that those exiting the workforce face in today’s economy. Our bill empowers seniors to make the health care decisions that best fit their individual needs without fear of a lifetime penalty, and I look forward to its quick passage.”

    “Seniors have paid into Medicare their whole life and it is time we make it easier to access the healthcare they have earned,” said Congressman Norcross. “Seniors already have to overcome complex hurdles to find the coverage they need, and they shouldn’t face excessive penalties for the time it takes them to do so. The Medicare Enrollment Protection Act will empower seniors across South Jersey and America, increasing access to high-quality health care without burdensome penalties.” 

    “We should be making it easier for seniors to access the health care they need, not harder, and that’s what this common sense, bipartisan bill will do,” said Rep. Angie Craig. “I’ll keep working across the aisle to lower health care costs, cut bureaucratic red tape and make life better for every Minnesotan.” 

    The legislation has earned support from national and local advocates. 

    “Ensuring that all seniors, including those on COBRA, receive fair and equitable treatment is a vital step forward. This proposal empowers seniors to make healthcare choices that best fit their needs without the worry of lifetime penalties. NABIP commends Representative Smucker’s commitment to this issue and urges Congress to support this proposal, ensuring seniors are not subjected to undue financial hardships while maintaining access to continuous healthcare coverage.” – NABIP CEO Jessica Brooks-Woods 

    Joshua Brooker, Chief Visionary Officer at SnapHealth and resident of Pennsylvania’s 11th Congressional District shared the following statement: 

    “As a constituent and someone who works closely with retirees navigating Medicare, I’m grateful for Congressman Smucker’s continued leadership on issues that impact seniors. In my experience, about 75% of those transitioning into retirement lean on a broker to help make sense of the process. For those who remain on COBRA, it’s often a well-intentioned decision based on familiarity and the desire to avoid making a mistake.

    The Medicare Enrollment Protection Act acknowledges that Medicare enrollment can be complex—and that sometimes, people simply need a little more time and clarity. This bill provides a thoughtful, one-time opportunity for individuals to make the switch without being penalized. It’s a practical, people-first solution that reflects the reality many retirees face.

    Thank you, Congressman Smucker, for continuing to support policies that meet seniors where they are.”

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Enduring Pacific partnerships

    Source: New Zealand Government

    Kia ora, aloha, good morning. 
     
    Interim President of the East-West Center, Jim Scott, distinguished guests.
     
    It is an absolute pleasure to be here in Hawaii, leading a cross-party delegation through the Pacific. New Zealand’s commitment to the Pacific is foundational to who we are as a people. It transcends governments, political parties, and the disruptive events and controversies of the moment. 
     
    A core and enduring part of New Zealand’s approach is our determination to work with our Pacific brothers, sisters and cousins to forge together a more secure, more prosperous and more resilient future, which grows opportunities and possibilities for our peoples.
     
    Our delegation is looking forward to an open, free-flowing discussion with you, representatives of the East-West Centre. This institution has, for generations, sought to promote dialogue about the developments in our region and the United States’ place in it. As the name of this Centre implies, the world works best when different cultures – from East to West – come together. 
     
    Before we start our discussion, I wanted to offer some reflections – as New Zealand’s Minister of Foreign Affairs – about the relationships binding New Zealand, the United States, the Pacific and the broader Indo-Pacific. 
     
    New Zealand and the United States are Pacific partners, as Hawaiians know well. Indeed, Auckland and Honolulu are two of the great Pacific cities: the northern and southern points of the so-called Polynesian triangle. Many, many Polynesians scattered across our vast, oceanic region have, over many, many generations, migrated to Auckland and Honolulu. These two wonderful cities stand as diverse, vibrant testaments to Polynesian histories and cultures. 
     
    We gather in Honolulu at an important, uncertain, anxious time in world affairs. Every day, we wake up to headlines about confronting events that are happening on the world stage.
     
    It is a common human tendency to think that the events or ravages of the moment are unprecedented. That the challenges we face are uniquely urgent or complex. Indeed, the most overused word in politics is ‘crisis’. This, coupled with the hyperactive social media age we live in, can generate an urge to react too quickly and too stridently. To set out absolute principles to defend. To draw battle lines. To pick sides. To form teams. To fight. 
     
    But, being in Honolulu, it’s hard not to take a longer view of what the world is currently experiencing and of the choices facing New Zealand and our Pacific partners. 
     
    This morning, we were hosted on the USS Missouri, where the Pacific part of World War II formally came to an end. This was a reminder of the history of shared sacrifice that forever binds New Zealanders, Americans and people from throughout the Pacific. 
     
    Our peoples have fought, and died, together in defence of a free, open and democratic region .  A region in which our people are free to elect their own political leaders and to worship the god of their choice. And a region, the Pacific, that lives up to the promise of that name.
     
    But this dark, painful chapter in our history also provides the backdrop to the efforts we have collectively made, in the eight decades since, to painstakingly build an international order based on dialogue, compromise, diplomacy and trust. This determination not to go back to an era of global wars – to prefer jaw, jaw to war, war – must always be at the forefront of our minds. 
     
    In recent weeks, the tendency to hype up a debate about how international trade works into a black-and-white, polarising issue has been unfortunate and misguided. The use of military language – of a “trade war”, of the need to “fight”, of the imperative to form alliances in order to oppose the actions of one country – has at times come across as hysterical and short-sighted.
     
    For a small country like New Zealand, when events are moving fast and changing day-by-day, the best course is almost always to be cautious, to be modest, to be pragmatic, and to be practical. To wait for the dust to settle before making choices we may later regret. 
     
    Working closely with our one formal ally, Australia, we are guided by a cool-headed assessment of New Zealand’s interests. Those assessments are formed by equally sober analysis of our relative strengths and vulnerabilities, rather than any desire to draw sharp lines in the sand, especially during times when the sand is shifting so fast its final shape is unknown. 
     
    There are historical parallels here. Notwithstanding our strong, indispensable and long-standing partnership during and since the two World Wars of the 20th Century, the governments and peoples of New Zealand and the United States have not always seen eye-to-eye. We have often fought side-by-side, but we have sometimes differed on certain military conflicts. New Zealand pursued a position on the nuclear issue with which the US disagreed. And US Presidents have not always been popular back home.
     
    Some of us have been around long enough to witness the ironies in the cycles of history. In two World Wars, New Zealanders were there from the beginning – and our country lost more people per capita than almost any other. We have also contributed military forces towards trying to solve countless other conflicts, alongside other Western countries. So we know about sacrifice and burden-sharing. 
     
    But we also recall certain protestors, in New Zealand and across the Indo-Pacific, chanting “Yankees Go Home!” during the rancorous days of the late 1960s. Some of those protestors chanted those words perhaps unaware that, just a few decades earlier, their parents and grandparents had been praying that the Americans would arrive to save them. 
     
    We also recall the order-shattering change throughout American history. Presidents as different as Thomas Jefferson, Andrew Jackson, Abraham Lincoln, Franklin Roosevelt and Ronald Reagan all, in historically significant ways, upended their inherited orthodoxies. Yet the enduring experiment in democratic government that was created by America’s Founders still stands, unbowed. 
     
    Appreciating this history also serves to quiet the breathless language of panic because what we are seeing now is what many of our predecessors have seen before. So, one lesson is that cool heads and quiet diplomacy will succeed where talk of “fighting” will not.
     
    My view of the strategic partnership between New Zealand and the United States is this: we each have the right, indeed the imperative, to pursue our own foreign policies, driven by our own sense of national interest. 
     
    But close friends do not need to be, and should not be, confrontational and rude with one another, as New Zealand sometimes was towards the United States in the mid-to-late 1980s. And we should never forget what binds and unites us, bonds stronger and more long-lasting than the controversies and headlines of the moment. 
     
    We should give each other the benefit of the doubt and a fair hearing, seek to understand each other’s perspectives, and find common cause and common purpose. 
     
    New Zealand looks forward to working with the new US Administration to support a peaceful, prosperous and resilient Pacific and wider Indo-Pacific region. We look forward to continue partnering across the interdependent areas of security, economics and development.
     
    We were in Washington DC recently, to meet representatives of the new US Administration, including the Secretary of State and the National Security Adviser. One message they had for us was that the United States expected New Zealand to carry our share of the burden in keeping our part of the world safe and prosperous. 
     
    This New Zealand government, through decisions on defence capability and development spending, is seeking to meet that challenge under difficult fiscal conditions. To carry, like we did in the war that ended on the USS Missouri, our part of the burden of keeping our region and our world safe, free and open.  We do this because it’s the right thing to do. Because it’s in New Zealand’s interests. 
     
    One message we carried to Washington DC was that New Zealand wants, indeed needs, for the United States to remain an active, engaged and constructive partner in the Indo-Pacific. 
     
    Our discussions here in Honolulu over the next few days are designed to reinforce that message, and to carry forward the generations-old commitment of New Zealanders and Americans to work together for a more peaceful, more prosperous, and more resilient Pacific. 
     
    On this score, we valued our discussions in Washington DC last month and we look forward to more constructive dialogue in the days ahead. We acknowledge there is uncertainty and indeed anxiety over aspects of current US policy towards the Pacific. Part of that is a natural and regular consequence of a change of Administration in Washington. Part of it relates directly to recent US decision-making on such issues as development spending and tariffs – positions that, in our view, are still evolving. 
     
    But our message to both our American friends, and to our Pacific family, is a timeless one. As we work through the issues facing us today, let us treat one another with open minds, hear each other out, opt for quiet rather than megaphone diplomacy, and remember our collective purpose of pursuing and protecting a free, democratic, open, prosperous and resilient Pacific. Let us proceed carefully, cautiously, and always as friends.
     
    In the coming days, we will be reflecting about the past as we contemplate the future. We will be having dialogue about the Pacific with representatives of the US Government, the governments of Northern Pacific countries Palau, Marshall Islands, and the Federated States of Micronesia, as well as the Hawaiian state Government.
     
    We will be visiting the Bishop Museum, one of the world’s largest repositories of Pacific artefacts, and Pearl Harbor – where the Second World War was dramatically changed on one, fateful day. And we will be laying a wreath in honour of American and New Zealand servicemen who died in defence of our region. 
     
    As we go through this interesting and important programme here in Honolulu, we will seek to remember those enduring values and interests that unite New Zealand, the United States and the Pacific. And we will continue to promote careful, pragmatic, quiet dialogue – aimed at deescalation and practical problem solving, rather than premature posturing.
     
    That is the Pacific Way. 
     
    Thank you. 

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: First Minister: Scotland must be resilient in face of global shocks

    Source: Scottish Government

    ‘UK response must reflect changing reality.’

    The Scottish Government will take steps to ensure Scotland is as “resilient as we can possibly be” in the face of global economic uncertainty, First Minister John Swinney has said.

    Responding to the events of the last few weeks, the First Minister has called for a UK Government response that reflects the fact that “the world is changing around us”.

    First Minister John Swinney said: 

    “I know that this is a time of great uncertainty for people, that many families and businesses are worried about what global events will mean for their finances.  That is why I want us to be united and creative in our response, to ensure that we are as resilient as we can possibly be.

    “My view is that UK response should include removing the self-imposed economic straitjacket of the Chancellor’s fiscal rules and reversing the job – and growth – destroying increase in employers’ National Insurance contributions. The world is changing around us and quite simply, the UK government needs to change too.

    “It should include closer alignment with the European Union. If trade barriers are being constructed across the Atlantic, they must be swept away in the Channel and North Sea.

    “And it should include investment in Scotland’s green industrial future.  If British Steel is to be nationalised to protect it, then so too should Grangemouth.

    “If a supercomputer is to be built in the London-Oxford-Cambridge triangle, then the cancelled supercomputer for Edinburgh should be restored.

    If carbon capture and storage is to proceed on Tyneside and Merseyside, it should be given an immediate green light for the north-east of Scotland too.

    “This is what it means to get serious about Scotland’s economic future. Given the scale of the threat, anything less is not good enough.”

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Government acts to save British steel production

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Press release

    Government acts to save British steel production

    Urgent action by the Government sees vote on emergency powers to save British steel production.

    • Parliament recalled to introduce emergency powers that will allow the Government to protect the Scunthorpe site
    • Unique action to gives the best chance of safeguarding steelmaking, protecting jobs, national security and supply chains.
    • This strategic decision aims to secure domestic steel production for nationally important projects like airports, rail and housing and deliver growth at part of the Plan for Change.

    Steelmaking is set to continue in Scunthorpe following urgent action by the UK Government on Friday 11 April.   

    The Prime Minister requested the recall of Parliament to vote on emergency legislation to prevent the blast furnaces being shut down.

    The move will maximise the chances of securing domestic steel production – a crucial national capability which was at risk of collapse under the site’s current ownership. This is a very specific intervention taken in exceptional circumstances.

    British Steel’s owners Jingye confirmed their intention to close the blast furnaces at Scunthorpe immediately, despite months of negotiations in good faith and a generous offer of co-investment from the UK government of £500 million. 

    If the blast furnaces were to be immediately switched off, this would put at severe risk the future of steelmaking at this unique site. 

    The legislation will give the Government the power to direct the company’s board and workforce, ensure they get paid, and order the raw materials to keep the blast furnace running.

    In the meantime, the Government has instructed the company’s UK management to continue the running of the plant to ensure the furnaces keep burning. This legislation means that anyone employed at the plant who takes steps to keep it running, against the orders of the Chinese ownership, can be reinstated if sacked for doing so.

    Steel is vital for both the UK’s national security and manufacturing, and crucial for the Government’s mission to build 1.5 million new homes in the UK as part of its Plan for Change, with construction projects requiring millions of tonnes of steel. 

    Given global economic instability, it is crucial that manufacturing is protected at home. That’s why the Government took action earlier this week to support the car industry by easing the path to the EV mandate and deliver a £30 million package to support the reopening of Doncaster Sheffield Airport, which is expected to support 5,000 jobs and boost the economy by £5 billion.  

    Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds said: 

    “We will always do what is necessary to keep Britain secure at home and strong abroad. We are doing what previous governments have failed to, acting in the national interest to help secure UK steelmaking for the future.

    “We negotiated with British Steel’s owners in good faith ever since coming to office. We made a generous offer of support to the company and I am deeply disappointed that we have been forced to take these measures, but Jingye have not been forthright throughout this process, and left us no choice but to act. 

    “We’re in a new and changing world where it’s never been more important to support our security and build our resilience, so that we can have strength abroad and renewal at home, and that’s what this government has done.” 

    A Bill was voted on by MPs on Saturday 12 April to ensure continuity of production at the Scunthorpe site – avoiding the danger and cost of allowing it to stop.  

    Funding for the site will come from the Government’s £2.5bn steel fund, to help rebuild the industry over the next five years.  

    NOTES TO EDITORS 

    • All funding required for the site will come out of existing budgets, within the departmental spending envelope set out by the government at Spring Statement 2025.No further government borrowing is envisaged to support any intervention
    • As the Chancellor and PM have made clear, the UK’s fiscal rules remain non-negotiable.

    Updates to this page

    Published 12 April 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-Evening Report: ‘Trump fatigue’ is putting Kiwis off the news, with trust in media still low – new report

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Merja Myllylahti, Senior Lecturer, Co-Director Research Centre for Journalism, Media & Democracy, Auckland University of Technology

    Getty Images

    The news media is doing its best to keep everyone up to speed with the pace of Donald Trump’s radical changes to the world order.

    But in Aotearoa New Zealand, where avoiding news is more common than in other countries, many of us are blocking our ears to it all.

    In 2025, “Trump fatigue” is now one of the key reasons 73% of New Zealanders say they actively avoid the news to some extent. For context, in Finland (where trust in news is highest), avoidance sits at only 21%.

    For our 2025 Trust in News report, we asked New Zealanders why they were avoiding the news and analysed 749 responses. A couple of quotes give a sense of what we found:

    “Trump, Trump, Trump and no real investigative news.” – Female, European/Pākehā, aged 55-64, party vote Labour in 2023.

    “I actively avoid any news of Donald Trump. If I hear any extreme right-wing views on the news […] I will turn it off. There is no place for that.” – Female, European/Pākehā, aged 35-44, party vote National in 2023.

    This fatigue appears to cross age, gender and even political boundaries. Incessant news about the unpredictable United States president had similar effects on a middle-aged Pākehā woman who voted National, an elderly Māori woman who voted Labour, and a middle-aged Pākehā who identified as “another gender” and voted Te Pāti Māori.

    Many said Trump-related reporting encouraged them to disengage from news entirely, or at least selectively avoid US politics.

    Other reasons for avoiding the news were familiar to us from earlier research: the overwhelming negativity, perceived political bias from journalists, sensationalism and the repetitive nature of the news cycle.

    The trust puzzle

    To measure general trust in news, we asked respondents to what extent they feel they can “trust most news most of the time”. The numbers agreeing with that statement have plummeted in New Zealand faster than in comparable countries, from 53% in 2020 to 33% in 2024.

    The slide has slowed, however, with general trust levels falling just one percentage point to 32% in 2025.

    We also asked respondents how much they agreed with this statement: “I think I can trust most of the news I consume most of the time.” Those who agreed stayed steady at 45%.

    And trust in all the New Zealand news brands we asked about had improved. Overall, trust in news appears to be stabilising, albeit at low levels.

    That may be better news for a functioning democracy, but our latest report also shows the number of New Zealanders “interested” or “very interested” in the news has dropped, from 72% in 2024 to 69% in 2025.

    At the same time, New Zealand has among the highest overall levels of interest in the news (92% at least “somewhat interested”) when compared internationally.

    This is something of a paradox, given the high numbers of news avoiders, with one-third (34%) of those surveyed saying they are “worn out by the amount of news these days”.

    Similarly, sizeable majorities say they are “highly interested” in international news (70%) and political news (60%). Yet many feel overwhelmed by the number of stories dealing with Trump, Gaza and Ukraine.

    One male respondent, 55-64 years old, said: “I try to Trumptox as much as is possible. He’s hard to escape currently, so I find myself [going] near news generally less and less to avoid the creep.”

    Politics and the news

    We also wanted to better understand the links between trust in news and politics, so this year we asked for respondents’ political leanings.

    Going by 2023 party vote, approximately 64% of those on the right and 54% on the centre-right believe you can’t trust the news. Those who trust the news most tend to be centre-left (46%) and left (40%).

    Those who voted ACT or NZ First in 2023 were more likely to avoid the news often. Those who distrust publicly-owned broadcasters RNZ and TVNZ tended to be on the right of the political spectrum, while those who distrust Newstalk ZB tended to be on the left.

    Social media as a news source

    The latest Reuters Institute survey of 47 countries found the use of Facebook for news had declined four percentage points in a year, with 26% of respondents now using it as a source.

    In New Zealand, the trend is the opposite. Facebook continues to be the main social media news source, rising from 53% in 2024 to 58% in our 2025 survey.

    But YouTube is growing fastest as a news platform in New Zealand: 43% of people in 2025 use the video-sharing platform as a news source, rising from 33% in 2024.

    Facebook, YouTube and Instagram are now among the seven most-used news sources in Aotearoa New Zealand. In order, according to our survey, these are Stuff, TVNZ, the New Zealand Herald, Facebook, YouTube, RNZ and Instagram.

    AI in the newsroom

    New Zealand newsrooms have rapidly adopted artificial intelligence (AI) tools in news gathering and production. One recent report suggested most story selection and placement on a major local news site is managed by AI.

    It remains to be seen how far into news production this trend will continue. But when we asked our survey respondents if they were comfortable with news mostly produced by AI with some human oversight, approximately 60% said no. Only 8% were comfortable with news mainly produced by AI.

    Conversely, when we asked about news produced mainly by human journalists with assistance from AI, 26% were comfortable and 35% felt uncomfortable. At the moment, then, New Zealanders seem to be generally wary of news produced or assisted by AI.

    Change is the only constant in New Zealand’s turbulent news media sector. As new complexities like AI emerge, the trust puzzle will become more complex too. Next year’s survey will give us a better sense of where these trends and attitudes are heading.

    The authors do not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and have disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. ‘Trump fatigue’ is putting Kiwis off the news, with trust in media still low – new report – https://theconversation.com/trump-fatigue-is-putting-kiwis-off-the-news-with-trust-in-media-still-low-new-report-252714

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: PM statement on British Steel: 12 April 2025

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Press release

    PM statement on British Steel: 12 April 2025

    Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s statement on British Steel this afternoon.

    Today, my government has stepped in to save British Steel. We are acting to protect the jobs of thousands of workers, and all options are on the table to secure the future of the industry. Delivering security and renewal for working people is at the heart of my Plan for Change.

    This government is turning the page on a decade of decline, where our manufacturing heartlands were hollowed out by the previous government.

    In recent weeks alone, we have announced the expansion of Heathrow airport and the building of the biggest theme park in Europe in Bedford. We are reforming our planning rules to build 1.5 million homes, and the infrastructure the nation desperately needs. New roads, railways, schools, hospitals, grids and reservoirs. British steel will be the backbone as we get Britain building once more.

    This is a government of industry. That’s why we’ve secured a better deal for the workers of Port Talbot. It’s why we fought to secure the future of Harland & Wolff. It’s why we’ve pledged £200 million to Grangemouth. Our industry is the pride of our history – and I want it to be our future too.

    A secure future. A Britain rebuilt with British steel, in the national interest.

    Updates to this page

    Published 12 April 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI USA: CONGRESSIONAL DEMOCRATS FIGHT BACK AGAINST TRUMP’S ATTACKS ON INDEPENDENT WORKER PROTECTION AGENCIES

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Hakeem Jeffries (8th District of New York)

    Washington, D.C. — Today, House and Senate Democratic Leadership filed an amicus brief opposing President Donald Trump’s unlawful attempts to fire members of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) and the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB). The individuals cited in this matter were duly appointed, congressionally confirmed board members at independent federal agencies. Illegal attempts to terminate them threaten the integrity of these institutions and their ability to protect American workers and uphold workplace democracy.
     
    The NLRB and MSPB play a critical role in protecting workers, both in public service and the private sector, in their right to seek better working conditions and in safeguarding a non-political, merit-based federal workforce.
     
    The brief was led by House Ranking Members Jamie Raskin, Gerry Connolly, and Bobby Scott, alongside House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries and Assistant Leader Joe Neguse, as well as Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and Senators Elizabeth Warren and Cory Booker – and was joined by 253 Congressional Democrats. 
     
    “Trump wants to dismantle the work of independent agencies like the National Labor Relations Board and the Merit Systems Protection Board. These agencies have existed for more than a half-century. They protect American workers, the integrity of our merit-based federal workforce, and the rights of whistleblowers. Trump is not a King, and he has no power to violate the law to target and fire excellent civil servants just because they don’t support his pet causes and the agenda of his billionaire friends,” said Ranking Member Jamie Raskin, House Judiciary Committee. “Democrats must stand up for a century of jurisprudence upholding administrative law because we are the party that fights for the rights of our workforce, unions, and American families.”
     
    “President Trump and Elon Musk were never on the side of workers and now that they’re in power, they’re doing everything they can to reward billionaire bosses like themselves at the expense of hardworking Americans. Their concerted efforts to silence and disband the NLRB and MSPB are not only unconstitutional, they are part of their strategy to strip workers of their rights and dignity,” said Ranking Member Gerry Connolly, House Oversight and Government Reform Committee
     
    “The National Labor Relations Act of 1935 (NLRA), which created the NLRB, expressly precludes any President from removing Board Members without good cause and due process to insulate the agency from political interference. Congress explicitly limited the Executive Branch’s ability to remove NLRB Members by requiring notice and a hearing, and that any removal is based on a ‘neglect of duty or malfeasance in office, but for no other cause[,]’ to protect it ‘from being subject to immediate political reactions at elections.’ Furthermore, the NLRB’s independence ensures it can fairly adjudicate labor disputes, hold law-breaking employers accountable, and issue rules to ensure that employees have the freedom to join or form a union,” said Ranking Member Bobby Scott, House Education and Workforce Committee
     
    “Donald Trump and Elon Musk are committed to breaking down protections for consumers and everyday Americans by any means necessary. That includes the blatantly illegal attempted firing of independent National Labor Relations Board and Merit Systems Protection Board leaders. House Democrats will not stand for it. Congress created these independent agencies by statute and clearing the decks of current leaders in order to appoint hacks who will bend the knee to Donald Trump is illegal. I am grateful to Rep. Raskin, Rep. Connolly, Rep. Scott and Assistant Leader Neguse of the Litigation/Rapid Response Task Force for their leadership as House Democrats join with Senate Democrats to push back against illegal attempts by Trump and Republicans to leave American workers and consumers vulnerable to fraud and abuse,” said House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries
     
    “No president, Democrat or Republican, has the authority to fire employees at independent federal agencies simply for disagreeing with them politically. House Democrats will continue to vindicate our constitution and the rule of law, and to speak up for workers, consumers, families, and the American people,” said House Assistant Democratic Leader Neguse
     
    “Donald Trump has ushered in an era of lawlessness and corruption,” said Leader Schumer. “Not only is he systematically dismantling our government, he is purging those who would help to hold him accountable in this endeavor. It is crucial that agencies like the NLRB and MSPB are able to operate within their full capacity to protect whistleblowers and workers. This flagrant disrespect for the law – and for the process of Senates confirmation – is something that has become a hallmark of Trump’s presidency. But Congressional Democrats are using every avenue to fight back.”  
     
    “Donald Trump’s ‘rich-as-hell’ donors expect a return on their investment in his campaign. Now, he’s giving it to them by kneecapping the agencies that stop billionaires and giant corporations from abusing workers and discriminating against employees,” said Senator Warren. “Democrats are united in fighting back against these illegal firings.”
     
    “President Trump is attacking independent agencies that Congress created to provide essential services to Americans,” said Senator Booker. “The illegal attempts to fire duly appointed and Senate-confirmed board members of the NLRB and MSPB are a direct threat to the protections that American workers and whistleblowers depend on. I’m proud to lead this effort in the Senate with Democratic Leader Schumer and Senator Warren and join over 200 of my congressional colleagues to defend our independent agencies and ensure that workers’ rights and our nation’s tradition of a merit-based federal workforce remain protected from partisan interference.” 
     
    The amici curiae file their argument in the cases involving the attempted unlawful firings of Gwynne Wilcox, a member of the NLRB and Cathy Harris, a member of the MSPB. 
     
    The full brief is available HERE. 

    ###

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: 200+ HOUSE DEMOCRATS FILE AMICUS BRIEF AGAINST UNCONSTITUTIONAL TRUMP BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP EXECUTIVE ORDER 

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Hakeem Jeffries (8th District of New York)

    Washington, D.C. — Today, House Democrats continued their efforts to push back against President Donald Trump’s unlawful executive directives by filing an amicus brief in defense of the essential constitutional principle of birthright citizenship in the matter of State of Washington, et al. v. Trump, et al. The brief was signed by 208 members of the Democratic Caucus, including leads and Litigation Task Force Co-Chairs Assistant Leader Joe Neguse and Ranking Member Jamie Raskin, along with House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries, Representatives Bennie Thompson, Ranking Member of the Homeland Security Committee, and Pramila Jayapal, Ranking Member of the Subcommittee on Immigration Integrity, Security, and Enforcement.

    Also at the forefront of the endeavor are Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) Chair Yvette Clarke, Congressional Hispanic Caucus (CHC) Chair Adriano Espaillat, Congressional Asian Pacific American Caucus (CAPAC) Chair Grace Meng, and Congressional Jewish Caucus (CJC) Co-Chairs Jerry Nadler and Brad Schneider.

    In their argument, the amici curiae (or friends of the court) presented overwhelming evidence that Trump’s day-one order to nullify birthright citizenship violates not just the Constitution and over a century of Supreme Court rulings, but also laws passed by Congress that have repeatedly guaranteed citizenship to children born in America.

    “An Executive Order is a Memo from the President to his staff. It does not trump federal law, much less the Constitution. Trump cannot end the Constitutional right to birthright citizenship with the stroke of his pen. That’s laughable. The order would strip children born in America of their rights under the Fourteenth Amendment, which violates the plain language of the Constitution, as repeatedly reaffirmed by the Supreme Court, as well as decades-old federal laws that codify this constitutional right,” said Ranking Member Raskin. “Trump not only believes he is above the law, he believes he has the power to strip the people of the United States of their fundamental constitutional rights and freedoms. The president does not get to decide who gets to be an American. That’s why I am proudly joining the fight to defend the Constitution, 150 years of legislative and judicial precedent, and the birthright of all children born in America.”

    “Donald Trump and Elon Musk will stop at nothing to enact their far-right agenda, including attacking the United States Constitution with an unprecedented assault on birthright citizenship and the Fourteenth Amendment. Their blatant and unlawful disregard for the rule of law in the form of this illegal executive order shocks the conscience and House Democrats will continue to push back against it. I am grateful to Rep. Raskin, Rep. Jayapal, Rep. Thompson, Rep. Clarke, Rep. Espaillat, Rep. Meng, Rep. Nadler, Rep. Schneider and Assistant Leader Neguse of the Litigation Working Group and Rapid Response Task Force for leading House Democrats as we stand up against this unconstitutional attack on the American way of life,” said Leader Jeffries

    “President Trump cannot overturn the 14th Amendment by way of executive fiat,” said Assistant Leader Neguse. “And as both the son of immigrants and a defender of the democratic values that form the foundation of our nation, I will push back against this blatantly unconstitutional effort.”

    “Under the Constitution, people born here are United States citizens, no matter who they are, what they look like, or where their families came from. It’s just that simple. We will not allow this administration to redefine what it is to be an American just to fit their outrageous anti-immigrant beliefs. Americans reject what Trump is trying to do and the courts should too,” said Ranking Member Thompson

    “Birthright citizenship is a core piece of our Constitution. Ending it through executive order is simply unconstitutional and a dangerous overreach of executive power,” said Ranking Member Jayapal. “All persons born on U.S. soil are U.S. citizens, that is what our Constitution dictates and is something President Trump cannot undo by waving a pen. As the first immigrant to serve as Ranking Member of the Subcommittee on Immigration, Integrity, Security, and Enforcement, I am proud to be co-leading on this amicus brief to stand up for the immigration laws of this country.”

    “President Trump’s unlawful executive order to revoke birthright citizenship is a flagrant violation of the Fourteenth Amendment and the President’s oath to protect and defend the Constitution. This is nothing more than a desperate attempt to sow division and stoke xenophobic sentiment for political gain. We are a nation of laws, not one ruled by a king, and the courts must step in to uphold the Constitution from those who seek to undermine it. I am proud to join my colleagues to fight against this unlawful action and protect the principles that have made our country into what it is today,” said Chair Meng

    “For more than a century, a cornerstone of our law is that those born on U.S. soil are American citizens. President Trump’s executive order to nullify birthright citizenship is in clear violation of the Fourteenth Amendment and is further evidence that extremist Republicans more concerned with dividing our country, not lower the cost of living, or improving economic conditions for hardworking Americans. President Trump has absolutely no authority to unilaterally write American citizens out of the Constitution, and any challenge to that notion is utterly fanciful. As Chair of the Congressional Black Caucus, I am proud to join my colleagues in making clear that we will not stand down against President Trump and extremist Republicans’ lawless and xenophobic attacks,” said Chair Clarke

    “Nearly 200 members of Congress banded together behind this critical amicus brief to defend birthright citizenship—one of the most fundamental promises enshrined in the 14th Amendment. For over 150 years, it has guaranteed that every person born on U.S. soil is equal under the law, no matter their background. Any attempt to dismantle this right by executive order is not only unconstitutional—it’s an attack on the very foundation of our democracy. For the Latino community, this fight is deeply personal. Our families are workers, business owners, taxpayers, and proud Americans who contribute to the strength and prosperity of this country every single day. Stripping their children of citizenship would create a dangerous underclass and tear at the fabric of our workforce and economy. We will not allow this nation to return to a dark chapter in its history—we will fight to protect the 14th  Amendment and the future it promises all our communities,“ said Chair Espaillat.

    “Since the founding of our country 249 years ago, we’ve recognized that every person born in the United States is a citizen. Turning against this founding principle goes against everything we believe in and hold sacred as a country. We should learn from history where this kind of dismantling of civil liberties leads. President Trump is tearing down our institutions and undermining the values that make America the greatest country in the world,” said Congressman Schneider

    “Donald Trump’s divisive and xenophobic policies seek to divide and distract us,” said Congressman Nadler.  “We are dealing with a President who believes he is not just above the law, but above the U.S. Constitution.  The 14th Amendment is clear that persons born in the United States are U.S. citizens. And yet, President Trump feels compelled to single-handedly change what has been universally understood about the law since the Amendment was adopted in 1868.  All Americans should be disturbed by Trump’s assertion that he can unilaterally change the Constitution at will to suit his purposes.  This represents an assault on our democracy, and we cannot stand idly by and allow the President to disregard fundamental pillars of the Constitution. That is why I am proud as the Congressional Jewish Caucus Co-chair to join my colleagues in leading this effort.”

    The full amicus brief is available HERE. 

    House Democrats add this to the growing list of court cases filed against the Trump Administration in which they have become involved, including successfully urging a federal judge to block efforts to dismantle the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). 

    litigationandresponse.house.gov

    ###

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Cardinal Parolin: A Christian perspective on the encounter between the Gospel and China

    Source: Agenzia Fides – MIL OSI

    Saturday, 12 April 2025

    by Cardinal Pietro Parolin*Vatican City (Agenzia Fides) – We publish Cardinal Pietro Parolin’s preface to the book by the missionary and priest Antonio Sergianni, “The journey of the Gospel in China. In the footsteps of Father Matteo Ricci” (published by “La conchiglia di Santiago”, San Miniato, Pisa). The book is a precious and passionate testimony to the adventure of Christianity in China, which was also born out of personal encounters with Chinese bishops, priests, and Catholic laity.Father Sergianni (84), a spiritual son of Father Divo Barsotti, entered the Pontifical Institute for Foreign Missions (PIME) as a young man and was ordained a priest in 1965. From 1980 to 2003, he served as a missionary in Taiwan, visiting several provinces of mainland China for long periods. He then worked for the Congregation for the Evangelization of Peoples, now the Dicastery for Evangelization, where he was responsible for the affairs of the Catholic Church in China.***There are many ways to look at China. And for a Christian, it is legitimate to look at China “in the light of the Word of God.” Thus writes Father Antonio Sergianni, priest and missionary, at the beginning of this book, hinting at the source of the unique and incomparable power that permeates its pages.Faith in Jesus Christ, as the Orthodox theologian Olivier Clément used to say, ‘is not an anxious pietism of life.’ Nor is it an idealism dedicated to imagining and building alternative worlds. Just as it recognizes that the Kingdom of God ‘is not of this world, whose form is passing’ (Paul VI, Credo of the People of God), faith in Jesus Christ can, almost as a ‘side effect,’ out of grace and humility, also make our view of worldly affairs clearer and more penetrating. It can lead us to realistically grasp dynamics ignored by geopolitical analyses, factors disregarded by economic interpretations, which usually do not take into account the expectations of greatness and goodness that mysteriously vibrate in the history and life of peoples.Dynamics and factors that today seem even more hidden and distant due to the global flow of media and communication in which we are all involved.With his faithful gaze, Father Antonio captures the human greatness of the Chinese people’s and Chinese civilization’s journey through time, helping us grasp it in all its breadth. A dizzying greatness, a kind of mystery of History, with a continuity spanning more than a thousand years, which seems to cross and overcome the caesuras between historical epochs. A human entity without equal in its writing and forms of social organization, which has always assigned its authorities the task of mediating and ensuring the balance between human society and the natural order. This is a reality that inherited from the Confucian tradition the conviction of its universal mission, of the centrality and attraction of its civilization, and which now appears with renewed prominence on the world stage, arousing diverse reactions ranging from admiration to anxiety, from hostility to sympathy.With the gaze of faith, Father Sergianni in his book glimpses a possible overlap between the Chinese reality, which pervades history as an unprecedented mystery, and another reality linked to a mystery of a different kind: the mystery that came into the world with the birth of Christ and gave birth to a people who pervade history until the end of time.With the gaze of faith, Father Antonio traces all the historical periods that have marked the encounter between the proclamation of Christ and China, from the arrival of the monks of the ancient Church of the East on Chinese soil in the first centuries of Christianity to the present day. With historical clarity and, at the same time, moving compassion, the author traces the golden thread of the encounters between the “mystery” of China and the Christian mystery that have so often occurred during this long adventure. This golden thread mysteriously interweaves failures and new beginnings, missed opportunities and new beginnings, tribulations and moments of grace. Each passage seems like a deposit and promise of something great that will soon unfold. Already now, and yet not yet.In the final stretch of the journey of the last decades, the gaze of faith with which Father Sergianni looks at history, at China, and at faith in China, becomes above all the gaze of a witness. One can say that the power, the intimate strength of this book, comes from the fact that it is, first and foremost, a testimony of Christian love. The pages in which he casually recounts his encounters and his long-standing bond with Chinese brothers and sisters in faith – bishops, priests, nuns, lay men and women – allow the reason and source of this love to shine through. Along his life’s journey, his love for Christ was strengthened and embraced by encounters with Chinese Catholic brothers and sisters. His love for Jesus was grateful, even to the point of shedding tears, when he saw what Jesus himself was doing among them. Among people who performed simple tasks during the time of tribulation and carried bricks down the river for years. Like the priest who told him how he was mistreated because he did not know how to “clean the toilets,” and how, precisely in such moments, he “felt the risen Jesus Christ at my side, a great peace, and the desire to sing.”Because of this vision of faith and his love for Chinese Catholics, Father Antonio also appropriately and objectively documents the concern of the Popes and the Apostolic See for the affairs of the Church in China. His account of the papal interventions regarding the proclamation of the Gospel in China, from Benedict XV to Pope Francis, testifies to the consistency of the criteria followed by the Bishops of Rome in various circumstances, who have always acted in fidelity to the apostolic nature of the Church, preserving the treasure of communion even in times of trial.The documentation compiled by Father Sergianni in the appendix to this volume is a valuable and useful tool for all those who wish to retrace, in an objective yet passionate way, the most important stages of the unparalleled journey of the Chinese Catholic community in recent decades, beginning with the proclamation of the People’s Republic of China.With his book, Father Sergianni clarifies what Pope Francis said: Even in times of patience and trial, “the Lord in China has preserved the faith of the People of God on this journey.” And today, Chinese Catholics, fully Catholic and fully Chinese, “in communion with the Bishop of Rome, are moving forward in the present age. In the context in which they live, they also bear witness to their faith through works of mercy and charity, and in their witness they make a genuine contribution to the harmony of social coexistence, to the building of our common home” (cf. video message to the International Conference for the 100th Anniversary of the Concilium Sinense, Rome, May 21, 2024).In the daily life of the “small remnant” of Chinese Catholics, with all their human limitations and poverty, this encounter takes place between the mystery of Christ’s efficacious grace and the historical events of Chinese reality, which Father Antonio describes in his book. From this interconnectedness, gifts can be released for all. This encounter, too, can mysteriously contribute to ensuring that the breath and longing for greatness of the Chinese people and all other peoples do not become closed in on themselves and fuel fears with endless wars, but are channeled toward paths of peace that promote encounters and paths of fraternity, of fraternal coexistence between different peoples.For all these reasons, we must thank Father Sergianni for the gift of this book.(Agenzia Fides, 12/4/2025)*Vatican’s Secretary of State
    Share:

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-Evening Report: Health workers call for NZ government to join global demands for ambulance massacre inquiry

    Asia Pacific Report

    Health workers spoke out at a rally condemning Israel’s genocide in Gaza and the latest atrocity against Palestinian aid workers today, calling on the New Zealand government to join global demands for an independent investigation.

    They were protesting over last month’s massacre of 15 Palestinian rescue workers and the destruction of their ambulances in Gaza’s Rafah district under heavy fire.

    The Palestinian Red Crescent Society (PRCS) has called for an independent international inquiry into the “deliberate killing” of 8 ambulance medics, 6 civil defence workers and 1 UN worker reportedly executed by the Israeli forces on March 23.

    Their ambulances were destroyed and buried together with the bodies of the victims in a shallow grave a week after the crews went missing.

    One PRCS paramedic, Assaad al-Nassasra, was reported to be still missing.

    Among the speakers in the rally in Tāmaki Makaurau Auckland’s Te Komititanga Square, Amnesty International’s Audrey Van Ryn said: “These killings must be independently and impartially investigated and the perpetrators held to account.

    “Medical personnel carrying out their humanitarian duties most be respected and protected in all circumstances.”

    Health worker Jason Brooke read out a message from the secretary-general of the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, Jagan Chapagain, in response to the killing of the Palestinian first-responders.

    ‘Their ambulances were clearly marked’
    “I am heartbroken. These dedicated ambulance workers were responding to wounded people. They were humanitarians. They wore emblems that should have protected them; their ambulances were clearly marked,” said Chapagain.

    “They should have returned to their families; they did not.”

    Fourteen of the Palestinian aid workers killed by Israel last month. The 15th is still missing. Graphic: Al Jazeera/Creative Commons

    Their bodies were discovered a week later by fellow workers. A video from one of the slain Palestinian Red Crescent medics contradicting the lies propagated by Israel’s military that the vehicles were “advancing suspiciously toward IDF troops without headlights or emergency signals”

    These first responders were not mistakenly misidentified. They were travelling, clearly visible in red crescent marked ambulances with their lights on. They posed no threat.

    According to the United Nations, at least 1060 healthcare workers have been killed in the 18 months since Israel launched its genocidal offensive in Gaza.

    “Whether it’s first-responders and medics, health workers or reporters, not only are these workers being targeted with impunity by the IOF, but their deaths seem to barely cause a ripple,” said Brooke, who was greeted with cries of shame.

    “Where is the condemnation of our politicians? Our media?”

    ‘Dehumanisation of Palestinian life’
    “As the Palestinian poet and author Mohammed El-Kurd suggests, what we are witnessing is the dehumanisation of Palestinian life.

    “Israel only has to mention the word ‘Hamas’ and the indoctrinated look-away. As if resistance to genocide itself were a crime — the punishment a life predetermined for death.

    “Genocide does not distinguish between civilian, aid worker, health worker, reporter and militant. All are condemned.”

    Medical personnel, medical transport, hospitals and other medical facilities, the injured and sick are all specifically protected under international humanitarian law.

    The devastating Gaza massacre represents the single most deadly attack on Red Cross or Red Crescent workers anywhere in the world since 2017.

    Secretary-general Chapagain said: “The number of Palestine Red Crescent volunteers and staff killed since the start of this conflict is now 30.

    “We stand with Palestine Red Crescent and the loved ones of those killed on this darkest of days.”

    PSNA advocate Janfrie Wakim . . . “We mourn those thousands of innocent people . . . who made the ultimate sacrifice with their lives.” Image: Asia Pacific Report

    ‘Palestine wants freedom to live’
    Palestine Solidarity Network Aotearoa (PSNA) advocate Janfrie Wakim called on the crowd to give each other “high fives” in recognition of their solidarity in turning up for the protest in the 79th week since the war began.

    “I like the sign in front of me: ‘Palestine wants the freedom to live while Israel has the freedom to kill!’ she said.

    “We mourn those thousands of innocent people  — some with families here and in Gaza and the West Bank — who made the ultimate sacrifice with their lives, and the thousands unaccounted for in rubble and over 100,000 injured.

    “Palestine wants the freedom to live while Israel has the freedom to kill!” . . . a placard at today’s Auckland solidarity rally. Image: Asia Pacific Report

    “Mostly women and children.

    “The humanitarian workers who have been murdered serving humanity.”

    Wakim said the genocide had been enabled by the wealthiest countries in the world and Western media — “including our own with few exceptions”.

    “Without its lies, its deflections, its failure to report the agonising reality of Palestinians suffering, Israel would not have been able to commit its atrocities.”

    All fatalities women and children
    Meanwhile, the United Nations reports Palestinian women and children were the only fatalities in at least three dozen Israeli air strikes on Gaza since mid-March, as it warned that Israel’s military offensive threatened Palestinians’ “continued existence as a group”.

    Ravina Shamdasani, spokeswoman for the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, said on Friday that the office had documented 224 Israeli strikes on residential buildings and tents for displaced people in the Gaza Strip between March 18 and April 9.

    “In some 36 strikes about which the UN Human Rights Office corroborated information, the fatalities recorded so far were only women and children,” she said.

    The findings come as Israel’s attacks on Gaza have killed more than 1500 Palestinians since the Israeli military broke a ceasefire in March, according to figures from the Palestinian Ministry of Health, reports Al Jazeera.

    A German official was the latest to call for an independent probe over Israel’s killing of the 15 medical aid workers.

    An investigation into Israel’s killing of paramedics must be carried out independently, said German Federal Government Commissioner for Human Rights Policy and Humanitarian Assistance Luise Amtsberg.

    “This alleged violation of international law must not go unpunished,” Amtsberg said in a message on social media platform Bluesky.

    Israel’s ‘distortion’ straining ties
    “The investigation must be carried out quickly and independently, and the perpetrators must be brought to justice as soon as possible. The Israeli government and judiciary have a duty here,” she said.

    Israel’s distortion of the event was “once again” straining ties between Germany and Israel, she added.

    Myriam Laaroussi, an emergency coordinator with Doctors Without Borders, known by its French initials MSF, told Al Jazeera from al-Mawasi, an area west of Khan Younis that houses thousands of displaced Gaza families, that the health system had been destroyed.

    Due to the Israeli blockade, the supplies needed to treat patients were lacking and had left children in Gaza vulnerable to disease, she said.

    The desalination unit was not functioning any more due to Israel’s decision to cut electricity, which had decreased the capacity to retain good hygiene and was leading to outbreaks of polio and scabies.

    “We see that it’s a ‘slow death’ for many Palestinians, with shortages of food and water leading to a loss of weight and medical issues,” she said.

    The ceasefire had been an opportunity to scale up the capacity of the different health facilities, but it had been too short to have enough effect, and now health facilities were being attacked again.

    A “Free free Palestine” placard at today’s Auckland solidarity rally. Image: Asia Pacific Report

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Business and Trade Secretary steel statement

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Oral statement to Parliament

    Business and Trade Secretary steel statement

    Opening remarks from the Business and Trade Secretary in the House of Commons.

    Mr Speaker we meet under exceptional circumstances to take exceptional action in what are exceptional times.

    Our request to recall Parliament was not one we have made lightly. And I am grateful, genuinely grateful, to Honourable members on all sides of this House for their cooperation and for being here today as we seek to pass emergency legislation that is unequivocally in our national interest.

    I would also like to particularly thank the staff here in Parliament for facilitating today.

    I would like to thank the Prime Minister, the Chancellor and the Home Secretary for their support.

    Indeed, the only reason we can take this action today is because of the restoration of economic stability and the dedicated resources for steel in the last Budget.

    I would like to recognise my honourable friend for Scunthorpe and the honourable member for Brigg and Immingham and for all my honourable friends from Teesside for their advocacy and engagement on behalf of their constituents throughout this matter.

    As honourable members will know, since taking office this government has been negotiating in good faith with British Steel’s owners, Jingye.

    We have worked tirelessly to find a way forward, making a generous offer of support to British Steel that included sensible, common sense conditions to protect the workforce, to protect taxpayers’ money, and create a commercially viable company for the future.

    Despite our offer to Jingye being substantial, they wanted much more, frankly, an excessive amount.

    We did, however, remain committed to negotiation. But over the last few days, it became clear that the intention of Jingye was to refuse to purchase sufficient raw materials to keep the blast furnaces running.

    In fact, their intention was to cancel and refuse to pay for existing orders.

    The company would therefore have irrevocably and unilaterally closed down primary steel making at British Steel.

    Now I want to make absolutely clear that separate to any conversation about a possible deal to co-invest in new facilities, the British Government offered to purchase raw materials in a way that would have ensured no losses whatsoever for Jingye in maintaining the blast furnaces for a period of time.

    A counter offer was instead made by Jingye for us to transfer hundreds of millions of pounds to them without any conditions to stop that money, and potentially other assets, being immediately transferred to China.

    They also refused a condition to keep the blast furnaces maintained and in good working order.

    Now even if I had agreed to these terms, I could not guarantee that further requests for money would not then be made.

    In this situation, with the clock being run down, doing nothing was not an option.

    We could not, will not, and never will, stand idly by while heat seeps from the UK’s remaining blast furnaces without any planning, any due process, or any respect for the consequences.

    And that is why I needed colleagues here today.

    • Verbatim readout of opening statement delivered to the House of Commons on Saturday 12th April 2025

    Updates to this page

    Published 12 April 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Labour urged to tax the rich to fund services: billionaires should not exist

    Source: Scottish Greens

    We cannot afford billionaires. Tax the super rich.

    Labour is failing people and planet and must tax the super rich to build a fairer, greener future, says Scottish Green Co-Leader Lorna Slater.

    Speaking at her party’s Spring Conference in Stirling, Ms Slater called for action to tax wealth and big polluters.

    Addressing a capacity crowd, Ms Slater said: “The last few years have been difficult for most people, but they haven’t been difficult for everyone. The wealth of billionaires has more than tripled since 2010. They’ve made out like bandits in the last few years, cashing in every step of the way.

    “Through austerity, COVID, global market turmoil – the super-rich have been able to shore up their wealth whilst ordinary people and families have suffered.

    “It is not right that as billionaires are getting richer and richer, household bills are getting higher and higher for everybody else. It is not right that fossil fuel companies have raked in huge profits, whilst abandoning any significant investment in green renewables. It is not right that some of the wealthiest people in our society are telling us that we cannot afford to provide vital services for people who need them while they are hoarding so much wealth.

    “It’s not that we can’t afford good public services, it’s that we can’t afford billionaires. Billionaires should not exist.

    “It is thanks to the Scottish Greens that the highest earners in Scotland, and people who own more than one home, have to pay more. When I see headlines in the right-wing press whining about Scotland’s fairer tax system – it makes me proud. We need to tax the rich.

    “We need to think beyond income tax, we need to tax wealth, we need to tax carbon emissions and the big polluters to put money back into people’s pockets, back into public services and to build a fairer, greener country.”

    Ms Slater finished by laying out Green policies that will cut carbon emissions while putting money back in people’s pockets.

    Ms Slater said:

    “In just over a year’s time, we’ll be heading into the 2026 Holyrood election and this is the story that we are going to tell.

    “Just like free bus travel for under 22’s, the things we need the Scottish government to do on climate will improve life opportunities for Scots, and will put money back in their pockets.

    “Green policies will make life better in practical ways. Warm homes. Clean air. Affordable trains. We know what change is needed. That’s why we exist.”

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Patrick Harvie calls for Greens to provide hope in final conference as leader

    Source: Scottish Greens

    We must remain hopeful and keep making positive change happen.

    Scottish Green Co-Leader Patrick Harvie has delivered his final conference speech as party Co-Leader.

    Addressing a hall of members Mr Harvie called for his party to offer hope and challenge the hateful politics of the far right.

    Mr Harvie said: “Ours must be a movement that offers vision, ambition, and clarity; only if we do that will we deserve the trust of voters; and our message is even more urgent and important in these unsettling times.

    “Green politics could hardly be more of a contrast with the rise of dangerous forces in today’s political climate; the far right threat is very real, and too much of the political spectrum is still behaving as though it can be defeated by imitation.

    “They tried that with anti-immigrant and anti-asylum prejudice, making policy ever more hostile and brutal. It harmed people, and it also didn’t work.

    “They tried it with Brexit, parroting meaningless slogans like ‘make Brexit work’ even though they knew it never could. It harmed people, and it also didn’t work.

    “They are now doing the same thing with the so-called culture war agenda, with transphobia and the right wing’s attempt to redefine free speech. It’s harming people, and it also cannot work to defeat the far right – playing into their agenda will only ever give the far right more political space.

    “Their ideas can only be defeated by openly and consistently challenging them, not by imitating them.”

    In closing his speech, Mr Harvie said:

    “For much of our party’s early history, people voted Green as a protest. That’s not enough. It’s not enough to win the chance to make change happen. It should never be enough to satisfy us.

    “Green politics must be about making a difference in the real world, because the challenges, and crises, that we exist to face are far too urgent.

    “Not just during my time in a leadership role, but throughout the two and a half decades of the devolution era, that’s what we’ve built – the capacity and the credibility to make change happen.

    “It took hard work, by many people over many years, to build this party into a political force in Scotland that’s capable of making the country a better place, and that can now point to a track record of doing it instead of just talking about it.

    “So that’s still the task before us – to take Green politics forward, to achieve more positive change in people’s lives, and to live up to our values in the way we do our politics, because that’s the only way to truly deserve people‘s trust, not just for ourselves, but for democracy.

    “So as I close my last speech as Co-Leader, I look forward to our party having the debate we deserve, the debate we need, about how to build on the most impactful period in our party’s history, and go forward to achieve even more positive change for people and for planet.

    “Thank you once again for the opportunity to serve.”

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-Evening Report: Dutton to offer targeted income tax offset of up to $1,200

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra

    Peter Dutton at his party launch on Sunday will offer a “cost of living tax offset” of up to $1,200 to more than 10 million taxpayers.

    The one-off offset would go to taxpayers earning up to $144,000 when they lodged their tax return for next financial year, making it more than a year off.

    The full offset would be available to those earning between $48,000 and $104,000 a year. About 85% of taxpayers would benefit from the offset and about half of all taxpayers would receive the maximum offset.

    The tax offer, costing 10 billion, compares with the government’s tax cuts – announced in the budget and legislated that week – that phase in starting mid next year and cost $17 billion over the forward estimates.

    The Coalition’s tax announcement comes as something of a surprise. The opposition had given the impression it believed tax cuts unaffordable.

    There was some disquiet in Coalition ranks at the decision to oppose the government’s tax cuts, and concern about the opposition going to the election with no promise for income tax relief.

    Dutton has returned to a former Coalition policy. The Morrison government introduced a low and middle income tax offset in the 2018-19 tax year. It was subsequently extended but then abolished by the Labor government.

    Dutton said the temporary and targeted offset would provide support for families while a Coalition government addressed the underlying economic problems.

    “Australians are hurting,” Dutton said.

    He said people needed help now.

    “A Coalition government will first provide help to families by cutting fuel by 25 cents a litre – a saving of about $1,500 a year for a two car family. And then by giving back up to $2,400 per family whilst we clean up Labor’s mess. Labor’s 70 cents a day is a bandaid on a bullet wound.

    “Our Cost of Living Tax Offset will put more money back into the pockets of millions of Australians at a time when they’re being crushed by skyrocketing grocery bills, rent, mortgage repayments and insurance costs.”

    He said “Labor’s “so-called tax cut – just 70 cents a day – is a slap in the face to hard working Australians and an insult to families trying to make ends meet”.

    “It shows just how out of touch Mr Albanese really is.”

    Shadow Treasurer Angus Taylor said the Coalition’s tax relief was responsible, temporary and targeted.

    “Labor’s big spending agenda is fueling inflation and driving up the cost of everything.

    “This offset is part of our comprehensive plan to rebuild the economy, ease cost of living pressures, and reward hard work.”

    The Liberal launch is in Sydney.

    Michelle Grattan does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. Dutton to offer targeted income tax offset of up to $1,200 – https://theconversation.com/dutton-to-offer-targeted-income-tax-offset-of-up-to-1-200-254204

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-Evening Report: Albanese pitches to aspiring home buyers with $10 billion plan and removal of means test on deposit guarantee

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra

    Anthony Albanese will promise a $10 billion scheme to facilitate the building of up to 100,000 homes that would be earmarked for sale to first home buyers.

    To be unveiled at Labor’s formal campaign launch in Perth on Sunday, the proposal would also give all first home buyers access to a federal government guarantee for a 5% deposit.

    At present this guarantee is provided only on a means tested basis, up to an income level of $120,000 for singles and $160,000 for couples.

    The government would also raise the price levels for properties to be eligible under the scheme.

    With the guarantee, buyers avoid having to pay expensive lenders mortgage insurance.

    The present 50,000 cap on the number of guarantees available would also be removed.
    The latest pledge takes the Labor government’s commitment to housing over its term to $43 billion.

    Housing affordability is one of the major issues of the campaign, especially for young voters. A survey by money.com.au recently found housing affordability and rental stress were the dominant concerns for Australians under 40.

    “Labor will enable every Australian to buy their first home with a 5% deposit,” the government says in a statement on its proposals. “There will be higher property price limits and no caps on places or income, in a major expansion of the existing scheme.”

    The present median home price in Australia is $820,000; 5% of that is $41,000.

    Under the changes, a Sydneysider and first home buyer would be able to purchase a $1 million apartment with a $50,000 deposit with their loan guaranteed by the Albanese government.“

    Property price limit rises


    Labor Press Release

    The government says the plan would cut the time people needed to save a deposit, and save them tens of thousands of dollars on lenders mortgage insurance.

    In its $10 billion investment, the government would partner with state developers and industry, to identify suitable projects, including the use of vacant or underused government land. States and territories would fast track land release, rezoning and planning approvals.

    The $10 billion would include up to $2 billion in grants and $8 billion in zero-interest loans or equity investment, primarily to states and territories. States and territories would have to match the $2 billion federal grants.

    The government says construction on the first projects would start in 2026-27, with buyers moving in from 2027-28.

    Albanese said: “I want to help young people and first home buyers achieve the dream of homeownership”.

    Housing minister Clare O’Neil said: “Young Australians are bearing the brunt of the housing crisis, and our government is going to step up to give them a fair go at owning their own home”.

    Michelle Grattan does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. Albanese pitches to aspiring home buyers with $10 billion plan and removal of means test on deposit guarantee – https://theconversation.com/albanese-pitches-to-aspiring-home-buyers-with-10-billion-plan-and-removal-of-means-test-on-deposit-guarantee-254205

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Names of two new Molonglo suburbs announced

    Source: Northern Territory Police and Fire Services

    The two new suburbs will bring the number of suburbs in the district to seven.

    Two new suburbs in the Molonglo Valley will be named Bandler and Sulman.

    These honour prominent Australians Faith Bandler AC and Sir John Sulman.

    These new suburbs will sit within the Molonglo Valley 3 East development. This is the next major stage of suburban development in the area.

    Bandler will be developed first. It will sit east of Whitlam across John Gorton Drive.

    This will bring the number of suburbs in the district to seven.

    Naming Canberra suburbs and places allows us to celebrate influential people from all backgrounds.

    Faith Bandler AC

    Ida Lessing Faith Bandler was a human rights activist, social justice advocate and author.

    She helped raise public awareness and understanding of:

    • the cultural heritage of South Sea Islanders and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples
    • women’s issues.

    Faith’s daughter Associate Professor Lilon Bandler said the naming acknowledged her mother’s dedication to creating a more just, inclusive world.

    “She had an unwavering commitment to civil rights and social reform that has left an indelible mark on our history. It is deeply moving to see her legacy honoured through the naming of this new suburb in Canberra, a city she visited many, many times.

    “As her daughter, I find it particularly fitting that the Division of Bandler will be located next to the Division of Whitlam. My mother often spoke of the importance of visionary leadership in creating social change,” Lilon said.

    Sir John Sulman

    Sir John Sulman was an architect and town planner. He helped shape Canberra in its early development and influenced the city’s design.

    He was appointed Knight Bachelor of the British Empire in 1924. This was in recognition of his influence and contributions in architecture.

    “Members of the extended Sulman family are delighted that my great-grandfather Sir John Sulman is being so very appropriately honoured,” Sir John’s great-grandson Emeritus Professor David Carment AM said.

    “He deserves this recognition for his significant contributions to Australia as an architect, patron of the arts, town planner and writer, and particularly for his vital role in Canberra’s development,” David said.

    Suburban themes

    Each suburb in the ACT has a theme used to help name its streets.

    For Bandler, the theme will be ‘Australian Social and Cultural Life’.

    For Sulman, it will be ‘Humanities and Social Sciences’.

    A possible town centre

    There is another suburb expected for the Molonglo Valley. This is yet to be named.

    The National Capital Authority is currently considering the reclassification of the commercial centre of Molonglo as a Town Centre.

    Have your say

    The ACT Place Names Advisory Committee welcomes suggestions of names and feedback from the Canberra community.

    More information about how places are named and how to provide feedback is available on the Place names page on the ACT Planning website.


    Get ACT news and events delivered straight to your inbox, sign up to our email newsletter:


    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: A new purpose-built facility for CAMHS

    Source: Northern Territory Police and Fire Services

    The Cottage program has helped young people build their confidence and capacity to return to school or other programs.

    In brief:

    • The Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services ‘Cottage’ program will relocate.
    • It will move to a brand-new facility in Lyons in 2026.
    • This is the first step in preparing the site at North Canberra Hospital for demolition, ahead of building a new northside hospital.

    The Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) ‘Cottage’ program at North Canberra Hospital will relocate to the southside.

    It will move to a new purpose-built facility in Lyons in 2026.

    The CAMHS Childhood Early Intervention Program and Dialectical Behaviour Therapy Program will also relocate to Lyons.

    CAMHS Cottage program

    The Cottage is a day program for teens with moderate to severe mental health issues. These issues impact their ability to attend school.

    The program has been successful in supporting young people to make functional gains.

    It also helps build their confidence and capacity to return to school or other programs.

    The new location

    The new Lyons location offers young people easy access to:

    • public transport
    • active travel networks
    • green space
    • recreation activities
    • other services.

    The ACT Government has appointed Billard Leece Partnership Pty Ltd as the design partner for the new facility.

    Design input from young people, carers, clinicians and the local community will help ensure it meets the needs of staff, patients and their families.

    The facility is expected to be complete in 2026. Until then, the Cottage will continue to operate at its existing site at North Canberra Hospital.

    Preparing for the new hospital

    This planned move represents the first step in preparing the site for demolition ahead of construction of the new northside hospital.

    The ACT Government is working with clinical services on the North Canberra Hospital campus to:

    • understand current and future needs
    • explore suitable locations for services that will have to move over the next few years.

    Find more information on the Northside Hospital Project at builtforcbr.act.gov.au.


    Get ACT news and events delivered straight to your inbox, sign up to our email newsletter:


    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI Video: 4 Ways To Help Teens With Phones & The Gran Chaco Forest | WEF | Top Stories Week

    Source: World Economic Forum (video statements)

    This week’s top stories of the week include:

    0:15 What leaders can learn from dance – In 2015, Misty Copeland became the first-ever Black principal ballerina at American Theatre Ballet. Today, Copeland works to open up ballet to young people from all walks of life through the Misty Copeland Foundation, an NGO she launched in 2022.

    3:26 4 ways to help teens with phones – Around 15 years ago, the world changed with huge implications for an entire generation. Smartphones have altered our lives for the better in many ways. But Jonathan Haidt believes that smartphones have also given rise to what he calls the ‘anxious generation’

    6:03 Latin America’s Gran Chaco forest – The Gran Chaco spans over 1 million km² across Argentina, Paraguay, Bolivia and a small portion of Brazil. The Gran Chaco is a mix of savannas, wetlands, and dry tropical forests. It’s home to 3,500 plant, 500 bird and 150 mammal species, including the Chaco eagle.

    8:01 How space changes life on earth – 64 years ago, astronaut Yuri Gagarin made humanity’s first trip into space, beginning an era of exploration that has sparked a host of scientific discoveries which have benefited society back here on Earth.
    _____________________________________________

    The World Economic Forum is the International Organization for Public-Private Cooperation. The Forum engages the foremost political, business, cultural and other leaders of society to shape global, regional and industry agendas. We believe that progress happens by bringing together people from all walks of life who have the drive and the influence to make positive change.

    World Economic Forum Website ► http://www.weforum.org/
    Facebook ► https://www.facebook.com/worldeconomicforum/
    YouTube ► https://www.youtube.com/wef
    Instagram ► https://www.instagram.com/worldeconomicforum/ 
    Twitter ► https://twitter.com/wef
    LinkedIn ► https://www.linkedin.com/company/world-economic-forum
    TikTok ► https://www.tiktok.com/@worldeconomicforum
    Flipboard ► https://flipboard.com/@WEF

    #WorldEconomicForum

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=78K2ShQKnEA

    MIL OSI Video

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Patrick Harvie Spring Conference speech 2025

    Source: Scottish Greens

    Patrick Harvie gave his final conference speech as Co-Leader of the Scottish Greens, urging his party to present a bold and inspiring alternative to a broken status quo and the far right Reform party.

    Now as you know, I’ve given more than a few co-leader speeches at our conferences, and I can’t really begin today without recognising that I’m turning the page now, both for myself and for the party.

    I’m want to say how grateful I am to everyone who has offered kind words since I announced that I won’t be standing for re-election as Co-Leader.

    And I want to thank everybody who has given me the opportunity to serve the party as co-convenor and then as Co-Leader; and everyone I’ve worked with across the party over many years.

    And naturally, having made that decision, I’ve been reflecting on the journey we’ve all been on.

    I think back to the public perceptions, and the internal reality, of the party I joined in 2001.

    A party with just one MSP, no councillors, and a handful of members. A party so strapped for cash that it only narrowly escaped being bankrupted by a photocopier contract. A party with so little profile or recognition that when you said told people you were a member, people thought you meant Greenpeace.

    I think back also to my experience of becoming part of our new parliamentary group in 2003, when we suddenly jumped up from one seat to seven. It was an exciting time, of course, but we knew that to most voters, to most politics watchers and to most of the media, we were an unknown quantity at best. 

    The Daily Mail knew what to make of us. As the first MSP to be elected as an out candidate, when I started talking about equal marriage and civil partnership, they splashed a front page with the headline “Green threat to the family.”

    In the article that followed, they fretted “describing himself as bisexual, enjoying relationships with both men and women!”. I mean if they’d written “hoping for…” it would at least have been accurate.

    And not long after that I was dubbed the voice of the “irresponsible left led anti family anti-Christian gay whales against the bomb coalition.” Because they hadn’t thought of the word woke by then.

    But even beyond the odd worldview of the Mail, much of the media saw us as nothing more than a novelty act, something to do with the environment, something a bit eccentric, but nothing like a serious political force.

    We wanted to change that perception. And slowly and surely, by taking our jobs seriously, and taking parliament seriously, we started to make others take us seriously. We built credibility. But that early success didn’t have a strong foundation.

    Though our national membership was still measured in the hundreds, we had run a decent campaign, on half a shoestring, but in truth the electoral weather had been very kind to us. We did need to build that political credibility, but we hadn’t yet built the strong campaigning party in the country that we would need when we faced a tougher election. 

    In 2007 we just about held on by our fingernails. We lost most of our seats, most of our staff, most of our profile, and most of our ability to achieve change.

    I never want that to happen to the Scottish Green Party again.

    We began the slow process of rebuilding the party, and because Parliament was so tightly balanced we did manage to find opportunities to keep making change happen, from funding climate work in communities, to passing hate crime laws. 

    But it was 2014, and in fact the few years running up to it, that changed everything.

    As soon as it was clear that Scotland would be making this historic decision on independence, we saw the opportunity not only to set out why independence fits with the Green vision, but why the Green vision is the path to making independence work – why a sustainable independent Scotland, able to move quickly and fairly away from the fossil fuel age, is the best future we can choose. 

    Some independence voices hadn’t yet moved on from “it’s Scotland’s oil.” To be honest, a few still haven’t even today. But we saw, and we seized, an opportunity to change the debate, and change the story of Scotland’s future.

    More than that, we wanted to show that people could debate that choice in good spirit, and that people can disagree and still be friends. And that positive ideas and vision are of more value than fear, opportunism, or insults. That Scotland was capable of the standard of debate we deserved.

    Our message reached more people than ever before, and more people than ever before decided to join. 

    There are people here today who joined in that surge, who attended branch meetings in the wake of the referendum, meetings where the overspills rooms needed overspill rooms.

    With the capacity and the profile that we gained in that period, 2016 restored our parliamentary group, and with the SNP returning to minority government we were able to achieve real change; passing legislation, winning the case for progressive tax reform, and forcing policy change from government, but – critically – building out political relevance; and we laid the groundwork for our best ever result in 2021.

    And on the back of that result, the opportunity to become part of the government presented itself. In the biggest and most participative democratic process our party has ever undertaken, our members first shaped and then approved the Bute House Agreement.

    Doing that was a clear statement that we’re here to make change happen, and that we were ready to step up and do the hard work that’s necessary to make change on a far bigger scale than ever before.

    Clearly, it was shorter lived than it could have been, and now some of our most important work is being undone or watered down by the SNP. But even without the chance to complete a lot of the work we got started, we made a bigger difference in people’s lives than ever.

    It’s the reason three quarters of a million young people today have a bus pass in their pocket today, making public transport an affordable and natural first choice. 

    It’s the reason investment in climate and nature hit record highs, investment that was needed because for far too long politicians had been setting targets and then blocking the action needed to reach them; and it’s the reason why better planning policies ensured that Loch Lomond has been protected from the damage threatened by FlamingoLand.

    This commitment to making change happen instead of only talking about it went well beyond the environmental agenda that Green politics is most strongly rooted in. The actions we took showed how Green ideas apply to social and economic policy, in ways that other parties have shied away from.

    It’s the reason tenants across the country were spared thousands of pounds in avoidable extra rent rises during a cost of living crisis.

    It’s the reason Scotland has continued on the path of more progressive taxation to help protect public services from the austerity first of the Conservative and now of a UK Labour Government.

    And it was also the reason that more people than ever before gave us their support. While the SNP’s legal woes and Nicola Sturgeon’s resignation led to a decline in their support, we saw the highest sustained period of polling in our party’s history, and an election in 2022 that exceeded all expectations.

    I’ll never forget the frustration of some of the SNP’s right wingers, furious at their own party for working with us, desperate to blame their loss of support on Green policies, but looking at our growing success with utter bewilderment. 

    So what now? How do we build on that success, and take Green politics forward in Scotland?

    In this party, it has never just been leaders who answer questions like that, but I’ve no doubt that over the coming months as we choose the leadership team for the 2026 election, these are the questions we will debate. 

    And I want that debate to be a positive, collaborative debate; just like that positive debate that we aimed for about the country’s future, that’s what our party deserves as we debate our own future.

    At any time, but especially now with basic democratic values facing new and very real threats, political parties should be willing to ask ourselves – why do people vote for us?

    For the Greens, many people see us as the political wing of the environment movement. That’s fundamental to our origins and our purpose, but it was never the whole of the answer

    Some people might vote for specific policies; whether that’s on climate & nature, housing, transport, independence, or anything else.

    These policy stances really matter, of course; they matter most if we can actually make them happen. And we should never lose sight of the need to build a reputation for actually turning ideas into reality; all those achievements we’ve made – Scotland is a fairer, better, and greener place because of this work; they are the achievements that are only possible thanks to the political credibility we’ve earned and the support people have given us at election time.

    But it’s a common error for people in politics to think these individual policy issues are what drive most people to the ballot box.

    For far more people, it’s more about who we are.

    We’re a party that’s always tried to be hopeful, even when that is hard work. We’re a party that’s always tried to be constructive – challenging others by putting forward better ideas, but also seeking out the common ground where cooperation can happen – and that’s ever more important in these dangerously polarised times.

    These have been parts of our political character that people really value.

    And I’m truly sorry to say that there have been times recently when I’ve had to ask if we really live up to those values? Times when instead of speaking up in an open and democratic way, a small minority of members have taken to anonymous leaks, smears, insults, undermining the work of fellow members and damaging our whole party and our reputation by doing so.

    I want to appeal to everyone, lets make sure that the next few months see a positive campaign that lifts our party up, one that lives up to the best of our values, not one that descends to the factionalism and toxicity that characterises too much of political debate.

    The vast majority of our members and our voters have had more than enough of that. I’m asking everyone in our party to call it out when they see it, and show those who behave that way that it’s not welcome in this party.

    Ours has to be a movement that offers vision, ambition, and clarity. It’s only if we do so that we will deserve the trust of voters; and our message is even more urgent and important in these unsettling times.

    Green politics could hardly be more of a contrast with the rise of dangerous forces in today’s political climate; the far right threat is very real, and too much of the political spectrum is still behaving as though it can be defeated by imitation.

    They tried that with anti-immigrant and anti-asylum prejudice, making policy ever more hostile and brutal. It harmed people, and it also didn’t work.

    They tried it with Brexit, parroting meaningless slogans like ‘make Brexit work’ even though they knew that it never could. It harmed people, and it also didn’t work.

    They are now doing the same thing with the so-called culture war agenda, with transphobia and the right wing’s attempt to redefine free speech. It’s harming people, and it also cannot work to defeat the far right – playing into their agenda will only ever give the far right more political space.

    Their ideas can only be defeated by openly and consistently challenging them, never by imitating them. 

    And that goes for the right’s contempt for democracy too – undermining trust in the democratic process is easy, and utterly destructive. Greens have a harder job to do, but a far more important one. We have to rekindle belief that in the idea that democratic politics is capable of making our society better, fairer and more liveable. 

    For much of our party’s early history, people might voted Green as a bit of a protest. That’s not enough. It’s not enough to win the chance to make change happen. It should never be enough to satisfy us.

    Green politics must be about making a difference in the real world, because the challenges, and crises, that we exist to face are far too urgent.

    Not just during my time in a leadership role, but throughout the two and a half decades of the devolution era, that’s what we’ve built – the capacity and the credibility to make change happen.

    It took hard work, by many people over many years, to build this party into a political force in Scotland that’s capable of making the country a better place, and that can now point to a track record of doing it and not just talking about it.

    So that’s still the task before us – to take Green politics forward, to achieve more positive change in people’s lives, and to live up to our values in the way we do our politics, because that’s the only way to truly deserve people‘s trust, not just for ourselves, but for democracy.

    So as I close my last speech as Co-Leader, I look forward to our party having the debate we truly deserve in the coming months, the debate we need, about how to build on the most impactful period in our party’s history, and go forward to achieve even more positive change for people and for planet.

    Thank you once again for the opportunity to serve.

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Lorna Slater Spring Conference 2025

    Source: Scottish Greens

    Speaking at her party’s Spring Conference in Stirling, Scottish Green Co-Leader Lorna Slater called for action to tax wealth and big polluters to build a fairer, greener Scotland.

    When we met last October our country and our world were in a state of flux. Our political landscape is still shifting dramatically. 

    We have a Labour government telling us that things can only get worse while they cut the incomes of sick and disabled people. They kept the cruel two child cap, which has plunged thousands of families into totally avoidable poverty.

    Although they look set to nationalise British Steel they have betrayed the workers of Grangemouth.

    They betrayed the WASPI women after campaigning for them for years.

    They kowtow to a far right Trump administration that is dismantling hard won rights and freedoms. 

    Donald Trump is a dangerous, fraudulent, misogynistic, racist, climate-change denier. 

    He opposes democratic values and the rule of law. 

    His White House is spreading lies and misinformation about abortion rights here in Scotland – including disgraceful attacks on our colleague Gillian Mackay’s Safe Access Zone Bill; 

    Labour may be happy to make friends with dangerous despots, but we refuse to play nicely while the world burns.

    Trump and his hateful politics are not welcome in Scotland. Our country is not his playground. 

    Prime Minister Keir Starmer, you need to cancel the state visit. Cancel it now.

    The impact of Nigel Farage’s hard right Reform party rising in the polls, is already being felt in Scotland as the Tories and Labour shift to the right to try and rescue their votes.

    The Tories dropping any kind of commitment to net zero, and Labour throwing trans-people under the bus.

    As Patrick said: You can’t beat the far right by stealing their policies.

    You don’t beat Nigel Farage by cozying up to Donald Trump.

    The Scottish Greens will stand our ground as a proud party of the left. 

    We stand with refugees who are being attacked by racist politicians and the billionaire-owned press. 

    We stand with people who have fled war and conflict only to be blamed by those who have cut services and plunged families into poverty.

    We stand with the trans community who have been the focus of a relentless campaign of demonisation from MPs and MSPs from all the other parties.

    Trans rights are human rights. Our Party stands with you today, tomorrow and always.

    We stand with the people of Palestine who are suffering a genocide that has been armed, and supported and enabled by the UK government.

    The crisis there is getting worse and so is the human cost. 

    Babies are being killed long before they have the chance to mark their first birthdays.

    And yet the response from Downing Street has been to continue supporting the carnage.

    If Labour is to have any moral authority then it must end arms sales to Israel.

    It’s not just them. It’s time for the SNP to finally end the grants that are bolstering Israel’s arms dealers.

    For all of us working towards a greener, fairer world, it can feel like we’re losing ground. 

    Sometimes it’s hard to keep hold of hope that we can build something better. 

    The future can be brilliant. We just have to decide to make it so. 

    By working together the Scottish Greens have already taken big steps into that better future. 

    We have taxed high earners to raise billions of pounds for public services; 

    We’ve given free bus travel to everyone under 22;

    We’ve made sure that every organisation in Scotland that receives public money, pays the living wage. 

    We’ve delivered free school meals to more hungry children than ever before; 

    Our rent freeze and eviction protections for renters across Scotland saved tenants thousands of pounds and protected many from being made homeless.

    We have made a big difference to people’s lives. 

    Our work has helped people and planet, and made our country a fairer and better place. 

    All of this has happened because of the work of the people in this room – our volunteers around the country, and our work with campaigners and activists. 

    Among the hardest working people in our movement are the Green Councillors who are transforming local communities for the better. 

    Green Councillors in Glasgow have secured free public transport pilots and extra funding for safer parks and streets. 

    In Edinburgh, our Green councillors stopped council venues and services running advertising from climate wreckers and arms dealers.

    Day in and day out, our councillors across Scotland are supporting their constituents and standing up for their communities. 

    That’s what Councillor Bryan Quinn did when he protected crucial library services and Community Access Points in Clackmannanshire. 

    It’s what Councillor Kris Leask did when he secured an Offshore Energy Strategy for Orkney – something which he’s now leading on delivering. 

    After years of campaigning, our Dunblane and Bridge of Allan councillor Alasdair Tollemache – working with my MSP colleague Mark Ruskell – has successfully protected a vital local green space, Park of Keir, from expensive luxury housing and a tennis centre with unaffordable and inaccessible facilities.

    These are the kind of things we achieve when we put our values into action. 

    It’s what we achieve when we work together to get greens elected. 

    We will be able to achieve even more by getting more Greens elected.

    Can we please all show our appreciation for our councillors.

    The last few years have been difficult for most people, but they haven’t been difficult for everyone. 

    The wealth of billionaires has more than tripled since 2010. They’ve made out like bandits in the last few years, cashing in every step of the way.

    Through austerity, COVID, global market turmoil – the super-rich have been able to enlarge their wealth whilst ordinary people and families have suffered. 

    It is not right that as billionaires are getting richer and richer, household bills are getting higher and higher for everybody else.

    It is not right that fossil fuel companies have raked in huge profits, whilst abandoning any significant investment in green renewables. 

    It is not right that some of the wealthiest people in our society are telling us that we cannot afford to provide public services for people.

    It’s not that we can’t afford good public services, it’s that we can’t afford billionaires.

    Billionaires should not exist.

    It is thanks to the Scottish Greens that the highest earners in Scotland, and people who own more than one home, have to pay more.

    When I see headlines in the right-wing press whining about Scotland’s fairer tax system – it makes me proud. 

    We need to tax the rich. 

    We need to think beyond income tax, we need to tax wealth, we need to tax carbon emissions, we need to tax the big polluters to put money back into people’s pockets, back into public services and to build a fairer, greener country. 

    Nowhere is this injustice more prevalent than when it comes to housing.

    Over the past decade, the cost of renting has skyrocketed. Landlords have been charging more than ever before.

    Right now, private landlords have too much power and renters are suffering.

    The Scottish Greens have made big steps to protect tenants.

    We froze rents and banned evictions in the aftermath of COVID.

    We wrote the Bill to introduce rent controls. 

    And thanks to protections brought in by the Scottish Greens, thousands of people have been protected from eye watering rent hikes. 

    But without us in the room, the SNP are turning their backs on renters. 

    They are buckling under pressure from vested interests who want to water down our rent controls. 

    They want landlords to be able to raise rents higher than inflation.  

    If people aren’t getting a big pay rise, why should landlords? 

    Homes should be for living in – not for profiteering. 

    It’s time to raise tenants rights and lower rents. 

    We’re campaigning to bring in a permanent ban on winter evictions, and we’ve got plans to help local communities force absentee landlords and landowners to sell or rent derelict land for housing. 

    It isn’t just housing where the SNP is coming up short. 

    It’s the same story when it comes to transport.

    If we want to reduce emissions and build happier, healthier communities – public transport is key. 

    Thanks to the Scottish Greens, hundreds of thousands of young people can now get a bus for free – saving families thousands of pounds, and opening up opportunities for Scotland’s young people. 

    Thanks to the Scottish Greens, people seeking asylum in Scotland will soon get free bus passes

    Thanks to the Scottish Greens, thousands of young islanders can now jump on inter-island ferries for free.

    We did that. 

    But the SNP has failed to deliver the scale of investment needed to make public transport a reliable, affordable and accessible option for all. 

    We need more publicly owned bus networks across the whole of Scotland – and capped bus fares. A cap of £2 for every local journey.

    Private bus companies should not be able to hike fares at the same time as cutting lifeline services. 

    It should not be cheaper to travel between Scotland’s two biggest cities by car than by rail.

    The Scottish Government should not be pouring funds into dualling the A9, increasing traffic, pollution and noise, instead of investing in buses and trains. 

    It is far too late in the climate emergency to be building new roads. 

    What we need is cheaper rail for all – that means ending peak time rail fares for good. 

    Cheaper buses, ferries and trains – a win-win for people and planet. 

    Our planet needs us. 

    I know I’m not the only one who has been really shocked by the wildfires that we are seeing across Scotland right now.

    Not the only one who has been horrified by the devastation to people’s homes, businesses and farms that has been done by floods and storms.

    This is the climate catastrophe accelerating. Governments around the world have let us down. They didn’t listen to science, they didn’t cut carbon emissions, they didn’t stop their destruction of our eco-systems.

    What we are seeing now in Scotland, will only get worse, if governments continue to prevaricate, unsure of how to politically manage the cost of moving to an economy that isn’t dependent on fossil fuels. 

    Well anyone who was flooded out or who’s land is burning can see the cost of not making the change.

    So much of what needs to change: insulating homes, building better public transport, building 20 minute neighbourhoods, moving to lower impact agriculture, will actually make life better for everyone. 

    For the kids who will be able to safely cycle to school. For the farmers who can improve their profits by buying fewer expensive fertilisers and pesticides.

    In just over a year’s time, we’ll be heading into the 2026 Holyrood election and this is the story that we are going to tell. 

    Just like free bus travel for under 22’s, the things we need the Scottish Government to do on climate will improve life opportunities for Scots, and will put money back in their pockets.

    Green policies will make life better in practical ways. Warm homes. Clean air. Affordable trains. More buses.

    We know what change is needed. That’s why we exist. 

    The power of our shared vision. So many new possibilities, so much potential. 

    Some say it’s the hope that kills you. I don’t believe that. 

    I think it’s the hope that keeps us all here. It’s certainly what’s kept me here. 

    Everything you do as volunteers in this party matters. Without all of you there would be no Greens in Councils or in Holyrood. There would be no free bus travel for asylum seekers or any of the other changes that we have achieved.

    Whether it’s the all important knocking on doors, taking meeting minutes, delivering leaflets, everything you do matters and it all adds up. It adds up to growing a Green movement in Scotland, it adds to how much we can get done.

    Thank you for all the work you do

    Thank you, in advance for the many miles of pavement you’ll be walking and wheeling in the next 14 months listening to voters on their doorsteps, delivering leaflets, supporting your candidates. We are so grateful for all of it.

    Now is the time to stand together. To be brave and bold. Our vision for a greener, fairer Scotland could never be more important. 

    Let’s show them that the Scottish Greens are the ones who deliver. 

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-Evening Report: Caitlin Johnstone: Israel’s innocent oopsie-poopsie medical massacre mistake

    Report by Dr David Robie – Café Pacific.

    COMMENTARY: By Caitlin Johnstone

    The Israeli military changed its story many times about why its forces killed 15 medical workers and then buried them and their vehicles to hide the evidence. After their initial claim that the medical vehicles were approaching “suspiciously” without their emergency lights on was disproven by video evidence, they then called the whole thing a big mistake.

    Sure, who among us has not accidentally massacred 15 medical workers and buried them and their vehicles in a shallow grave from time to time? We’re only human, mistakes happen.

    Asked by the press about Israel’s latest war crime scandal, White House National Security Council spokesman Brian Hughes blamed the whole thing on Hamas, saying, “Hamas uses ambulances and more broadly human shields for terrorism.


    “President Trump understands the impossible situation this tactic creates for Israel and holds Hamas entirely responsible.”

    Netanyahu could live stream himself eating a Palestinian baby and telling the camera “I am eating this baby because I love genocide,” and the next day Trump’s podium people would be responding to questions from the press by shrieking “HAMAS!” with their fingers in their ears.


    Israeli’s ‘innocent mistake’    Video/Audio: Caitlin Johnstone

    To be helpful I have written some headlines the Western press can use to frame Israel executing 15 medical workers in the most positive light possible:

    “Fifteen medical workers pause rescue duties following bullet-related incident”

    “Rescue workers, vehicles found in shallow grave after perishing for mysterious and unknowable reasons”

    “Israeli forces appear to be suspected of possibly accidentally firing on ambulance staff by mistake, perchance”

    “Medical workers killed by IDF, says Hamas-affiliated United Nations”

    “IDF assists medical workers in locating scene of latest massacre in Gaza”

    “Jews in New York City feeling unsafe, unsupported in wake of latest Israel controversy”

    “IDF to launch investigation into alleged IDF oopsie-poopsie in Gaza”

    “The universe is an ineffable mystery; objectivity is a myth and our finite primate brains were not evolved to comprehend any ultimate truths about absolute reality in its naked form”

    “Gunshots heard in the Middle East. A flashing siren. Innocence no more.”

    “IDF hunted and slaughtered 15 healthcare workers and buried them and their vehicles to try to cover it up, please don’t fire me, that’s what happened, I’m just trying to do my job”

    Not taking a position on Gaza is taking a position on Gaza. One you’ll have to live with for the rest of your life.

    The mass media are giving so much more attention to this past weekend’s anti-Trump protests than they ever gave the anti-genocide protests because that is their job. It’s their job to amplify opposition between the two mainstream parties while marginalising those who oppose the crimes of both.

    Movements which keep people plugged in to the two-party sock puppet show will always be amplified and encouraged, while movements which highlight the abusiveness of the US empire regardless of who happens to be in office will always be ignored at best and smeared at worst.

    That’s why we’ve seen so much attention go into Trumpism and anti-Trumpism while genuine anti-war movements struggle to get off the ground, and while pro-Palestine demonstrators are slandered as anti-semitic terrorist supporters.

    As long as people can be herded into supporting either of the two mainstream parties against the other, they are fully plugged in to the artificially manufactured worldview which protects the interests of oligarchy and empire. When people draw attention to the tyranny and abuse of the US empire itself without getting drawn in to the two-handed puppet show of party politics, they unplug their minds from this worldview the propagandists have worked so hard to plug them in to.

    As long as enough people are either screaming “Trump!” or “Not Trump!”, the empire’s crimes can continue unimpeded. Only when people stop clapping along with the puppet show and start fighting against the empire itself will there be real change in a positive direction.

    This means opposing the abuses that are advanced by both parties like war, genocide, militarism, imperialism, capitalism, Zionism, and authoritarianism. Until then their political energy will keep being steered in directions which pose no threat to the powerful, like we’re seeing with these anti-Trump protests.

    I’ve been seeing a lot of antiwar Trump supporters finally starting to admit that they were duped, and beginning to turn against him. I won’t join the voices slamming them for supporting Trump in the first place; I’ll only say welcome aboard, and congrats on being better people than everyone else who voted for Trump.

    Caitlin Johnstone is an Australian independent journalist and poet. Her articles include The UN Torture Report On Assange Is An Indictment Of Our Entire Society. She publishes a website and Caitlin’s Newsletter. This article is republished with permission.

    This article was first published on Café Pacific.

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Secretary of State for Transport’s vision for transport

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Speech

    Secretary of State for Transport’s vision for transport

    The Secretary of State for Transport talks about her vision for a transport system that works for everyone.

    Thank you, David, for that introduction.  

    Good evening, everyone, and welcome to the National Railway Museum in York. 

    I’m tempted to say we’re in the country’s finest transport museum, but as a Swindon MP and a former Deputy Mayor for Transport in London, I feel I should tread carefully.

    So welcome to ONE of the VERY BEST transport museums in the country!

    It feels fitting for me to do my first big transport speech here.

    The history of our transport network — the stories of the men and women who designed it, built it, operated and used it — are woven into the fabric of our communities in 21st century Britain.

    And it’s you — the people in THIS room — who are adding to that rich tapestry every day.

    You keep life moving.  

    You get children to school, commuters to work, and families to their holidays.  

    You move the goods that stock our shelves, fuel our industries, and keep businesses thriving.  

    You don’t just connect places — you connect people with the things that they need to get on in life.  

    And it’s in the spirit of connection that I’d like to tell you a story.   

    I hope you won’t be disappointed to learn that I haven’t invited you here for a big policy announcement or news headline, but rather to share a little bit about who I am and what I believe.

    I want to tell you a story about the people and places who have shaped my thinking.

    I grew up in Swindon.

    A proud railway town on the M4 corridor – a place with much to be proud of. 

    It’s also a humble football town – and I can tell you, that as a Swindon Town supporter, I have learnt the lessons of humility all too well.

    By fate and circumstance, that’s where my journey began.  

    Outside our semi detached house, I remember my dad’s first van parked up — ‘Malcolm Alexander Electrical Services’.

    I remember the first bike I was given – blue with a basket on the front — a bit like the blue crate I’ve got on my bike now.

    And I remember learning to drive around the town’s infamous Magic Roundabout. 

    And the car factories that punctuate the town’s history – Rover, Honda and now, BMW.

    It’s fair to say that in 1980s Swindon, the car was king.  

    It still is.

    The proliferation of out of town shopping centres, urban expansions and a minimal public transport network shaped the transport destiny of my town.

    Now, I won’t pretend that urban planning preoccupied my teenage mind too much. 

    Back then, I was much more concerned about whether Wham! were going to make it to Number 1. 

    But when I moved away and got my first job, I began to see the bigger picture… 

    … that a poor transport network will limit choices.  

    … that it can block the aspirations of young people.   

    And, most important of all, a good transport network can do precisely the opposite. 

    I was the first person in my family to go to university. 

    And like so many, I found work and opportunities in the capital.  

    And so it was, at the age of 29, I walked into Lewisham Town Hall as a newly elected councillor – becoming the cabinet member for regeneration just two years later.

    I loved that job, and I fell in love with transport.  

    Now, I’ll admit …

    It wasn’t the language of highways management that enthralled me: “There’s no such thing as a speed hump Cllr Alexander, only speed tables and speed cushions.” 

    But it was the extension of the East London Line, the creation of new brownfield sites around major railway stations, the improvements to walking and cycling links that really got me hooked.

    I learnt quickly that transport shapes a lot more than roads and railways. 

    And equally important, I learnt that it takes a lot of people to shape transport itself.  

    At Lewisham, I saw first-hand how transport investment could make a dramatic difference to people’s lives.  

    Take Brockley Railway Station.

    For years, it was an uninspiring, inaccessible place. 

    Uninviting, a bit run down.   

    Not somewhere you’d instinctively love as you rocked up for your morning commute.  

    But working with local campaigners, we delivered step-free access, a stunning landscaped ramp and better connectivity along the London Overground. 

    Today, Brockley is thriving. 

    It’s a place where the old and the new coexist. 

    The Wetherspoons on the corner and fried chicken shops sit side-by-side with bakeries, breweries and a pedestrianised square.  

    It was a transport scheme that built a stronger, more connected community. 

    And, it was transport that made the difference down the road in Lewisham too.  

    We transformed it — relocating and improving a bus station, moving a roundabout, redesigning the roads, creating land for new homes, new public spaces and new opportunity. 

    And when I say “we”, I mean the hundreds of people from different organisations who made it happen — people like you. 

    When a few years later I became the Member of Parliament for Lewisham East, transport was always right at the top of the list of my constituents’ concerns.  

    The longer train station platforms that were worse than useless without the longer trains to stop at them.

    The toxic air being pumped into homes around the South Circular.

    And when I later became Deputy Mayor for Transport in London, I had the privilege of working on those concerns more closely than I had ever done before.  

    Look, London is big. 

    So yes, naturally, I’m proud of the big stuff: 

    Straining to keep the capital moving through Covid. 

    Working on the Elizabeth line to deliver the jewel in the crown of the UK’s rail network. 

    Sticking to my guns on the Silvertown Tunnel, a new river crossing that enables London’s red double-deckers to go under the Thames to the east of Tower Bridge for the first time.

    But honestly, big doesn’t always mean beautiful. 

    Transport isn’t just about the price tag on the project. 

    It’s about delivering a better everyday experience – buses that come on time, accessible stations, well managed road works. 

    I’m just as proud of the smaller projects that made a big difference — many delivered in London by my good friend and then colleague Will Norman — segregated cycle lanes on Jamaica Road and Evelyn St, more secure cycle parking, slower speeds on roads with high KSIs, a direct vision scheme to improve visibility from the cabs of HGVs.

    These were transport interventions which ultimately delivered better public health, as well as better public realm.

    So when I moved back to Swindon a couple of years ago, I wasn’t just carrying a dream about becoming the MP for my home town.

    I arrived with baggage — determined to deliver for Swindon in a similar way to London. 

    Not the same solutions — as every place is different, but to give people options and opportunity.

    There isn’t something in the water that makes Swindonians love their cars more than Londoners.  

    Just a reality that public transport is better in London.  

    And I think it’s a failure of imagination, as much as a failure of policy, that young people in Swindon don’t have better options than I had decades ago. 

    Because change is possible.  

    Across the country — from Swindon to Shrewsbury,  Rotherham to Peterborough — we have underused transport assets. 

    Unloved railway buildings — land surplus to requirements or land that could be made so. 

    Neglected stations, like Brockley.  

    Potential that shouldn’t go to waste, but we know that, too often, it does.  

    And with vision, funding and collaboration, these could become hubs of regeneration, places that don’t just usher people through — but bring people together. 

    We talk about delivering “London style” transport to other places.   

    But I think we should talk more about “Swindon style” transport for Swindon, or “York style” transport for York. 

    And I want to support the capability and capacity within councils and combined authorities to deliver regeneration, investment and tangible improvements.  

    We have great mayors.  

    We have great local leaders.  

    We have great organisations working nationally and regionally.  

    We have a lot of talent in this room and beyond.  

    So, the question for me, is how do we best harness that?  

    Obviously, this is a question that has vexed me particularly since I took a call from the Prime Minister at the tail end of November, asking me to serve as his Transport Secretary.  

    And as someone who has skin in the game as a local MP and a passion to build on the work started by the force of nature, Lou Haigh, I naturally said yes.  

    And here I am.  

    Full-circle in some ways, and trying to shape a new path in another.   

    And the task is to build a better decade for transport. 

    Towards a better railway… 

    Laying the foundations for reform — establishing Shadow Great British Railways and launching a consultation on the upcoming Railways Bill to unify track and train

    Towards public ownership… 

    Passing the Passenger Railway Services Act, with the first operators — Southwestern and c2c — moving into public hands in the coming months. 

    Towards better buses…  

    Introducing the Bus Services Bill, giving local authorities greater control over routes, timetables, and fares — backed by over £1 billion in investment to improve reliability and frequency. 

    Towards better roads… 

    Investing £1.6 billion in local highways, an uplift of £500 million on last year — enough to fill an extra 7 million potholes. 

    Towards fairer work… 

    Enshrining greater protections for seafarers in law. 

    Towards cleaner skies… 

    Introducing the Sustainable Aviation Fuel mandate and launching a consultation on the revenue certainty mechanism. 

    Towards a fossil-free future… 

    Supporting the installation of thousands of new EV charge points—helping to drive record electric car sales, with 31% of new cars sold in December last year being electric. 

    And towards a transport system that supports the aspirations of everyone in this country… 

    It’s why I am so proud to work with the ministerial team at the Department for Transport.

    Like me — and like all of us — they’ve seen the difference that good services make… 

    …Whether it’s the tap-and-go trams and buses in Mike Kane’s patch, with fares capped at £2 on Greater Manchester’s Bee Network. 

    …Or in Simon Lightwood’s patch, where the mass transit system will improve integrated travel options in West Yorkshire, improving access to opportunities for people in Leeds and Bradford.

    …Or, in Nottingham, where one of the local bus operators, Nottingham City Transport, has been voted UK operator of the year a record six times, with passenger satisfaction amongst the highest in the country. I hear Lilian Greenwood is a pretty good local MP too …

    And as for Peter Hendy, who is his own walking museum of transport knowledge, he has a phrase that I would like to steal.  

    He talks about transport needing to be “boringly reliable”.

    And he’s right.  

    If public transport options are boringly reliable, then it means day-to-day life is easier for everyone. 

    So, by 2035, I want public transport to play a greater role in national life, becoming the easiest, most attractive choice… brilliantly and boringly reliable.  

    Enrique Peñalosa, a former mayor of Bogotá, once said:

    “An advanced city is not one where the poor have to own a car, but one where the rich choose to use public transport.” 

    That’s a vision I believe in.  

    But I can picture the headlines now — so let me counter the column inches before they emerge: there is no such thing as a war on motorists.  

    I drive. I own a car and I love it — a racing green Mini Cooper convertible.

    I walk. I cycle.  

    I take buses, trains, and taxis.  

    And I’ll bet most of you do too.  

    No serious person is proposing to ask people like my dad, a self employed electrician, to swap their van for a bus, forcing them to lug all their kit around — I certainly am not.   

    Through his career, my dad was a professional problem solver, and I hope I’ll carry the torch for that family tradition.   

    But I’ll be focussing on solving the real problems, not wasting time on the invented ones.   

    Because I’m sure everybody in this room would agree that where you live shouldn’t determine what you can achieve…  

    …that your hometown, no matter how big or how small, should provide the transport options to meet your aspirations… 

    … and that — if transport doesn’t nurture young people with the opportunities they deserve, then our entire economy misses out on the talent it needs to grow. 

    That’s why we’re here today. 

    To have the conversations that bring us closer together.  

    I want to harness your talents, your expertise and your drive to solve real problems.  

    Because, no matter where people are travelling to, they should be proud of where they’re coming from. 

    Thank you, and have a lovely evening.

    Updates to this page

    Published 12 April 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI USA: Department of Energy Overhauls Policy for College and University Research, Saving $405 Million Annually for American Taxpayers

    Source: US Department of Energy

    WASHINGTON– The Department of Energy (DOE) today announced a new policy action aimed at halting inefficient spending by colleges and universities while continuing to expand American innovation and scientific research. In a new policy memorandum shared with grant recipients at colleges and universities, DOE announced that it will limit financial support of “indirect costs” of DOE research funding to 15%. This action is projected to generate over $405 million in annual cost savings for the American people, delivering on President Trump’s commitment to bring greater transparency and efficiency to federal government spending.

    “The purpose of Department of Energy funding to colleges and universities is to support scientific research – not foot the bill for administrative costs and facility upgrades,” U.S. Secretary of Energy Chris Wright said. “With President Trump’s leadership, we are ensuring every dollar of taxpayer funding is being used efficiently to support research and innovation – saving millions for the American people.”

    Through its grant programs, the Department provides over $2.5 billion annually to more than 300 colleges and universities to support Department-sanctioned research. A portion of the funding goes to “indirect costs”, which include both facilities and administration costs.

    According to DOE data, the average rate of indirect costs incurred by grant recipients at colleges and universities is more than 30%, a significantly higher rate than other for profit, non-profit and state and local government grant awardees. Limiting these costs to a standard rate of 15% will help improve efficiency, reduce costs and ensure proper stewardship of American taxpayer dollars.

    Full memorandum is available here:

    POLICY FLASH

    DATE: April 11, 2025

    SUBJECT: Adjusting Department of Energy Grant Policy for Institutions of Higher Education (IHE) 

    BACKGROUND: Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(a)(2), the Department of Energy (“Department”) is updating its policy with respect to Department grants awarded to institutions of higher education (IHEs).

    Through its grant programs, the Department funds Department-sanctioned research. A portion of the funding goes to “indirect costs”, which include both facilities and administration costs. See 2 C.F.R. 200.414(a). “Facilities costs” comprise “depreciation on buildings, equipment and capital improvements, and operations and maintenance expenses,” while “administration costs” are “general administration and [other] general expenses,” like funding for “the director’s office, accounting, [and] personnel.” Id.

    While the Department is cognizant that many grant recipients use indirect cost payments to effectuate research funded by the Department’s grant awards, these payments are not for the Department’s direct research funding. See 89 Fed. Reg. 30046-30093. As these funds are entrusted to the Department by the American people, the Department must ensure it is putting them to appropriate use on grant programs. To improve efficiency and curtail costs where appropriate, the Department seeks to better balance the financial needs of grant recipients with the Department’s obligation to responsibly manage federal funds.

    This memorandum accordingly sets forth the Department’s updated policies, procedures, and general decision-making criteria for establishing indirect cost rates when awarding grants to IHEs; these policies, procedures, and criteria are intended to better balance the Department’s dual responsibilities to grant recipients and the American people.
    The Department is initially taking this action only with respect to IHEs. See 2 C.F.R. 200.414(c)(1); id. 200.1.

    ESTABLISHING APPROPRIATE INDIRECT COST RATES: 

    At present, the Department’s indirect cost rate for IHE grants is typically negotiated by either “the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) or the Department of Defense’s Office of Naval Research (DOD), normally depending on which of the two agencies (HHS or DOD) provide[d] more funds to the [relevant] educational institution for the most recent three years.” 2 C.F.R. pt. 200, app. III(C)(11)(a)(1). Though the Department generally must accept this negotiated rate, see 2 C.F.R. 200.414(c)(1), it may deviate therefrom for “a class of Federal awards” after implementing and making publicly available “the policies, procedures and general decision-making criteria” it will follow when seeking and justifying deviations. Id. 200.414(c)(1), (3). A “class of Federal awards” is defined to include “a group of Federal awards . . . to a specific type of recipient or group of recipients,” such as grants to IHEs—the class relevant to this policy update. Id. 200.1.

    For the reasons set forth in this memorandum, hereinafter, the Department will no longer use the negotiated indirect cost rate for grants awarded to IHEs. Instead, it is setting a standardized 15 percent indirect cost rate for all grant awards to IHEs. This is at the high end of the “up to 15 percent” de minimis rate permitted by government-wide regulation. See, e.g., 2 C.F.R. 200.414(f). Consistent with this memorandum, the Department is undertaking action to terminate all grant awards to IHEs that do not conform with this updated policy. See 2 C.F.R. 200.340(a), (b). Recipients subject to termination will receive separate notice and guidance.

    All future Department grant awards to IHEs will default to this 15 percent indirect cost rate. This system will better balance the Department’s twin aims of funding meaningful research and upholding its fiduciary duties to the American people.

    Additional information is forthcoming.

    This flash will be available online at the Department of Energy Policy Flashes website.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Congresswoman McCollum Votes No on Republican Budget Resolution

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congresswoman Betty McCollum (DFL-Minn)

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — The Republican-majority U.S. House of Representatives voted to advance a budget that instructs Congress to make massive cuts to Medicaid, food assistance, and other programs Americans rely on, while adding $14 Trillion in new debt over the decade. Congresswoman McCollum (MN-04) joined all Democrats and two Republicans in voting no on the measure. 

    Following the vote, Congresswoman Betty McCollum released the following statement:

    “House Republicans are advancing an agenda that serves the wealthiest Americans at the expense of our nation’s working families. The Republican budget is a framework that instructs the Energy and Commerce Committee to cut Medicaid by as much as $880 billion and cut SNAP by as much as $230 billion, yet it fails to save any money. The reality is that by giving away massive tax cuts for giant corporations and billionaires like Elon Musk, their budget burdens Americans with trillions of dollars in new debt.

    “President Trump’s ‘Big Beautiful Bill’ fails to do anything to address the high cost of living or fix the economic mess created by the President’s trade war.”

    Congresswoman McCollum emphasized that this budget is virtually the same as the original budget passed by the House of Representatives in February. Just like the first budget, the budget passed today by House Republicans would harm Minnesotans on Medicaid.

    “Nearly 1.3 million Minnesotans—about one quarter of our state—are covered by Medicaid. A cut of this magnitude would have severe consequences on health care access for the families, seniors, people with disabilities, and especially children who rely on this coverage. That includes 172,000 of my constituents here in the Fourth District, 90,000 of whom are children on CHIP. The health and well-being of our communities are under attack by this Republican majority.

    “Here in the Fourth District, 54,000 Minnesotans rely on SNAP to put food on the table. SNAP Programs are particularly important to children as well as many seniors on a fixed income. I will continue to oppose all Republican efforts to take away food, healthcare, and basic government services that Minnesotans rely on.”

    ###

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: SCHNEIDER, LYNCH LEAD EFFORT TO HOLD ELON MUSK’S DOGE ACCOUNTABLE

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Representative Brad Schneider (D-IL)

    Rep. Brad Schneider’s DOGE Accountability and Transparency Act will require the Elon Musk-run entity to provide weekly reports to Congress

    WASHINGTON, DC – Rep. Brad Schneider (IL-10), Chair of the New Democrat Coalition and member of the House Ways and Means and Foreign Affairs Committees, introduced legislation today with Rep. Stephen F. Lynch (MA-08) aimed at securing greater transparency and accountability from Elon Musk’s DOGE. 

    The DOGE Accountability and Transparency Act requires DOGE to submit a weekly report to Congress that details changes it implements across federal agencies and identifies expected savings and other impacts. 

    “We all want a government that is always looking to improve efficiency and effectiveness, but that is not what Elon Musk is doing at the helm of the so-called Department of Government Efficiency,” said Rep. Schneider. “Musk and his DOGE minions have launched a campaign of chaos across the entirety of our federal government that has diminished the functioning of essential federal services that keep our families healthy, our communities safe, and our privacy secure. Rather than saving money and improving quality of services, DOGE and Musk are more often creating greater inefficiencies and costing taxpayers dearly in wasted resources and lost time.”

    Since President Trump took office, DOGE has taken several actions that raised widespread concern and alarm over the consequences of its operations. For example, DOGE has: 

    • Consistently lied to American taxpayers about its efforts to cut spending through its error-ridden online tracker;
    • Gained access to the private medical, bank account, social security and other sensitive personal data about every American;
    • Gained access to the secure payroll system that process salaries for more than 250,000 federal employees, despite the objections of senior IT staff who feared it could make the system vulnerable to terrorist cyberattacks;
    • Irresponsibly slashed the IRS workforce, forcing the agency to suspend audits in process and forfeit collecting taxes due to the US Treasury;
    • Devastated mental health support for veterans provided through the VA;
    • Laid off bird flu leadership and experts despite a bird flu outbreak, disrupting testing efforts;
    • Accidentally fired more than 300 employees responsible for overseeing the US’s nuclear stockpile at the National Nuclear Security Administration;
    • And much more.

    “We should not allow Elon Musk to recklessly take a chainsaw to our federal government; he must answer to Congress and provide real, regular updates on DOGE’s actions,” continued Rep. Schneider. “The richest man in the world, no matter how smart he thinks he is, cannot continue his capricious rampage through the federal government without proper Congressional oversight.” 

    “We cannot let President Trump’s version of ‘Wreck-it-Ralph’ distract us while Elon Musk continues to gut agencies that are responsible for providing American families with essential needs and services,” said Rep. Lynch. “We must hold President Trump and Elon Musk accountable for their actions, and this bill will ensure there is proper oversight of DOGE by requiring them to submit weekly reports to Congress so we can ensure that their actions are lawful and individual rights are protected. I am grateful for the partnership of Rep. Schneider and I look forward to continuing our work together to ensure DOGE, Elon Musk, and President Trump are all held accountable for their actions and policies.”

    The bill requires the Administrator of the U.S. Department of Government Efficiency Service to provide weekly reports to Congress on any change DOGE has made to each Federal agency, including:

    1. The statutory authorization for each change made;
    2. Any change in the number of employees at each agency, including the employees that have resigned, been removed, or had their position eliminated;
    3. A description of each specific change DOGE has made to the respective Federal agency, including to an office within such agency;
    4. Any cost-saving measure;
    5. Any policy change;
    6. Any physical change to a Federal agency structure or location, including moving a Federal agency to a different building and relocating employees; and
    7. A description of any Federal agency data accessed by DOGE, the name of the individual who accessed it, the purpose for that access, and what was done with the data.

    The bill also requires retroactive reporting to ensure Congress is made aware of all of DOGE’s actions between January 20, 2025 and the bill’s enactment. 

    Bill text is available here.

    ###

    MIL OSI USA News