NewzIntel.com

    • Checkout Page
    • Contact Us
    • Default Redirect Page
    • Frontpage
    • Home-2
    • Home-3
    • Lost Password
    • Member Login
    • Member LogOut
    • Member TOS Page
    • My Account
    • NewzIntel Alert Control-Panel
    • NewzIntel Latest Reports
    • Post Views Counter
    • Privacy Policy
    • Public Individual Page
    • Register
    • Subscription Plan
    • Thank You Page

Category: Russian Federation

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Marat Khusnullin: Since 2019, more than 1,170 memorial sites dedicated to the Great Patriotic War have been improved in Russia

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: Government of the Russian Federation – An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.

    Square in Voldarsk, Nizhny Novgorod region.

    Improvement of places with memorials of the Great Patriotic War helps to preserve the memory of the heroism of those people who defended our country and sacrificed their lives for peace and freedom. This work is carried out in Russia annually, Deputy Prime Minister Marat Khusnullin reported.

    “Victory Day is one of the most significant holidays in the history of our country. This day is dedicated to the feat of Soviet soldiers who fought with honor against the Nazi invaders. The Great Patriotic War left a deep mark on history, and we must honor the memory of the fallen so that their sacrifices are not forgotten. Improvement of memorial sites is one of the ways to express respect and gratitude to the heroes. The renovation of spaces where monuments, war memorials, Alleys of Memory, Eternal Flame, and mass graves are located is carried out annually as part of the federal project “Formation of a Comfortable Urban Environment”, which this year became part of the national project “Infrastructure for Life”. Since 2019, more than 1,170 such sites have been improved,” Marat Khusnullin noted.

    Work on reconstruction and visual transformation of memorial territories makes a significant contribution to the preservation of the history and cultural heritage of the country. Among the main improvement works are the implementation of territory planning, landscaping, installation of additional lighting, arrangement of pedestrian zones and places for the placement of military equipment from the Great Patriotic War.

    “This year, Russia celebrates the 80th anniversary of the Victory in the Great Patriotic War. On the occasion of these most important events in the history of the country, festive events are planned in the regions, including the improvement of 97 memorial spaces, emphasizing the significance of the feat of people who united to preserve their Fatherland. The largest number of sites are planned to be improved in the Sverdlovsk Region – 11, Omsk Region – 9, the Republic of Buryatia – 9 and Bryansk Region – 7. This year, among other things, it is planned to improve memorial sites in cities and towns that, being in the rear, forged and brought Victory closer during the Great Patriotic War. Among them are a walking route from the central city square to Victory Park – the Glory Memorial in the city of Verkhnyaya Tura in the Sverdlovsk region, Victory Park in the village of Kamensk in the Republic of Buryatia, Victory Park and public spaces along Plyasova Street in the city of Mogocha in the Zabaikalsky Krai,” said Minister of Construction and Housing and Public Utilities Irek Faizullin.

    For example, in the Nizhny Novgorod Region, 28 memorial public spaces were improved from 2019 to 2024 as part of the federal project “Formation of a Comfortable Urban Environment”. Among them are memorial squares and memorials with heroic symbols of the Red Army. Work was completed on the improvement of the Unknown Soldier Square in the city of Gorodets. Every year on May 9, residents of the town come to the square to lay flowers at the monument and remember their relatives who defended the Motherland.

    In the Smolensk region, 11 historical sites have been improved. Among them is a monument with a BM-13 rocket launcher (Katyusha), which was erected in honor of the world’s first rocket artillery. The monument is a cultural heritage site of federal significance, and is considered a landmark and calling card of the city of Rudny in the Smolensk region.

    In the city of Kotelnikovo in the Volgograd region, the monument to the Great Patriotic War “Mass grave of Soviet tank soldiers who died during the Battle of Stalingrad” has been improved. Rotmistrov Street is one of the main streets of the city and connects the railway and bus station with the central part of the city. The monument located on it is compositionally united with the central park of culture and recreation, improved in 2018, the entrance to which is located nearby.

    It is also worth noting that the All-Russian competition for the best design of shop windows and entrance groups of non-residential, social, cultural and other facilities “Victory Spring” is dedicated to the celebration of the 80th anniversary of Victory in the Great Patriotic War. The Ministry of Construction is holding it together with the Association for the Development of Territories with the support of the Presidential Administration and the All-Russian Association for the Development of Local Self-Government. The regional stage of the competition will be held until May 12, 2025, and the federal stage will take place from May 15 to June 11.

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    MIL OSI Russia News –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Russia: Financial news: 07.05.2025, 14-34 (Moscow time) the values of the upper limit of the price corridor and the range of market risk assessment for the security RU000A0JXSS1 (Akron B1P2) were changed.

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: Moscow Exchange – Moscow Exchange –

    07.05.2025

    14:34

    In accordance with the Methodology for determining the risk parameters of the stock market and deposit market of Moscow Exchange PJSC by NCO NCC (JSC), on 07.05.2025, 14-34 (Moscow time), the values of the upper limit of the price corridor (up to 85.11) and the range of market risk assessment (up to 914.84 rubles, equivalent to a rate of 12.5%) of the RU000A0JXSS1 security (Akron B1P2) were changed.

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    Please Note; This Information is Raw Content Directly from the Information Source. It is access to What the Source Is Stating and Does Not Reflect

    HTTPS: //VVV. MEEX.K.M.M.

    MIL OSI Russia News –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Russia: Financial news: 05/07/2025, 16-16 (Moscow time) the values of the upper limit of the price corridor and the range of market risk assessment for the security RU000A1029A9 (Rosmorp1R1) were changed.

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: Moscow Exchange – Moscow Exchange –

    07.05.2025

    16:16

    In accordance with the Methodology for determining the risk parameters of the stock market and deposit market of Moscow Exchange PJSC by NCO NCC (JSC), on 07.05.2025, 16-16 (Moscow time), the values of the upper limit of the price corridor (up to 102.01) and the range of market risk assessment (up to 267.62 rubles, equivalent to a rate of 12.5%) of the security RU000A1029A9 (Rosmorp1R1) were changed.

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    Please Note; This Information is Raw Content Directly from the Information Source. It is access to What the Source Is Stating and Does Not Reflect

    HTTPS: //VVV. MOEX.K.M.M.

    MIL OSI Russia News –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Russia: Financial news: New basis for calculating the zero-coupon yield curve for government bonds comes into force on May 15, 2025

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: Moscow Exchange – Moscow Exchange –

    From May 15, 2025, a new composition of the calculation base for the Zero-coupon yield curve of government bonds (federal loan bonds) will come into effect.

    The calculation basis for the zero-coupon yield curve of government bonds, effective from 15.05.2025

    No. Name State registration number
    1 OFZ 26234 SU26234RMFS3
    2 OFZ 26229 SU26229RMFS3
    3 OFZ 26219 SU26219RMFS4
    4 OFZ 26226 SU2626RMFS9
    5 OFZ 26207 SU26207RMFS9
    6 OFZ 26232 SU26232RMFS7
    7 OFZ 26212 SU26212RMFS9
    8 OFZ 26242 SU26242RMFS6
    9 OFZ 26228 SU2628RMFS5
    10 OFZ 26218 SU26218RMFS6
    11 OFZ 26241 SU26241RMFS8
    12 OFZ 26221 SU26221RMFS0
    13 OFZ 26244 SU26244RMFS2
    14 OFZ 26225 SU26225RMFS1
    15 OFZ 26233 SU26233RMFS5
    16 OFZ 26240 SU26240RMFS0
    17 OFZ 26243 SU26243RMFS4
    18 OFZ 26230 SU26230RMFS1
    19 OFZ 26238 SU26238RMFS4
    20 OFZ 26239 SU26239RMFS2
    21 OFZ 26247 SU26247RMFS5
    22 OFZ 26236 SU26236RMFS8
    23 OFZ 26237 SU26237RMFS6
    24 OFZ 26248 SU26248RMFS3
    25 OFZ 26235 SU26235RMFS0
    26 OFZ 26224 SU26224RMFS4
    27 OFZ 26246 SU26246RMFS7

    Detailed information on the zero-coupon yield curve for government bonds (federal loan bonds) is available on the exchange’s website HTTP: //moex.Kom/a3642

    Contact information for media 7 (495) 363-3232Pr@moex.kom

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    Please Note; This Information is Raw Content Directly from the Information Source. It is access to What the Source Is Stating and Does Not Reflect

    HTTPS: //VVV. MOEX.K.M.M.

    MIL OSI Russia News –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Russia: Financial news: 05/07/2025, 17-46 (Moscow time) the values of the upper limit of the price corridor and the range of market risk assessment for the security RU000A0ZYFN3 (DOM.RF B10) were changed.

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: Moscow Exchange – Moscow Exchange –

    07.05.2025

    17:46

    In accordance with the Methodology for determining the risk parameters of the stock market and deposit market of Moscow Exchange PJSC by NCO NCC (JSC), on 07.05.2025, 17-46 (Moscow time), the values of the upper limit of the price corridor (up to 104.75) and the range of market risk assessment (up to 1077.22 rubles, equivalent to a rate of 7.5%) of the RU000A0ZYFN3 security (DOM.RF B10) were changed.

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    Please Note; This Information is Raw Content Directly from the Information Source. It is access to What the Source Is Stating and Does Not Reflect

    HTTPS: //VVV. MOEX.K.M.M.

    MIL OSI Russia News –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Russia: Dmitry Chernyshenko congratulated radio workers on their professional holiday

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: Government of the Russian Federation – An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.

    Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Chernyshenko congratulated workers in the fields of communications, radio engineering and radio journalism on Radio Day.

    In his congratulatory message, the Deputy Prime Minister emphasized the historical significance of the invention of radio for the development of modern technologies and communications.

    “Today is a professional holiday for everyone whose life and work is connected with radio. In 1895, the outstanding Russian physicist Alexander Popov created a wireless radio receiving and transmitting system. This became the basis for the development of navigation devices, mobile communications, wireless data exchange networks and the Internet, without which it is impossible to imagine our life,” said Dmitry Chernyshenko.

    He noted that radio remains an important source of information and entertainment for millions of Russians.

    “Tens of millions of Russian citizens remain loyal fans of radio. It serves as a source not only of entertainment and music content, but also of prompt reliable news. I would like to note that more than 3.5 thousand licenses for radio broadcasting have been issued in our country. The rapid development of the industry makes a significant contribution to achieving Russia’s technological leadership – a national goal set by President Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin. Radio stations are mastering modern technologies, including artificial intelligence, and the digital platform for distributing online radio channels is strengthening its position,” said Dmitry Chernyshenko.

    Last year, the Government supported more than 200 socially significant projects of electronic media. Of no small importance is the systematic training of highly qualified personnel for the industry.

    In conclusion of his congratulations, Dmitry Chernyshenko wished the radio workers health, success and continuous growth of their audience.

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    MIL OSI Russia News –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Russia: Financial news: Corporations attracted 1.1 trillion rubles on the Moscow Exchange bond market in April 2025

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: Moscow Exchange – Moscow Exchange –

    The total volume of bond trading on the Moscow Exchange in April 2025 amounted to 3.2 trillion rubles, excluding overnight bonds (1.8 trillion rubles in April 2024).

    Primary market

    The total volume of placement and buyback of bonds on the Moscow Exchange in April 2025 amounted to 1.9 trillion rubles, including the volume of placement of one-day bonds in the amount of 398 billion rubles.

    In April, 101 new corporate bond issues from 51 issuers with a total volume of 1.1 trillion rubles were placed on the Moscow Exchange. The total volume of corporate bond placements and buybacks amounted to 1.2 trillion rubles (561 billion in April 2024).

    Secondary auctions

    The total volume of secondary bond trading on the Moscow Exchange amounted to 1.7 trillion rubles (943 billion rubles in April 2024).

    The total volume of transactions by individuals on the Moscow Exchange bond market in April amounted to 560.0 billion rubles, which is more than twice the figure for April 2024. Their share in the total volume of bond trading in T mode in March was 31.5%.

    Evening trading in April accounted for 3% of the total trading volume on the bond market.

    The volume of over-the-counter transactions with the central counterparty (OTC with the central counterparty bonds) at the end of the month amounted to 345.5 billion rubles.

    Contact information for media 7 (495) 363-3232Pr@moex.kom

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    Please Note; This Information is Raw Content Directly from the Information Source. It is access to What the Source Is Stating and Does Not Reflect

    HTTPS: //VVV. MEEX.K.M.M.

    MIL OSI Russia News –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Russia: Financial news: 05/07/2025, 11-14 (Moscow time) the values of the upper limit of the price corridor and the range of market risk assessment for the RU000A100VG7 (SUEK-F1P3R) security were changed.

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: Moscow Exchange – Moscow Exchange –

    07.05.2025

    11:14

    In accordance with the Methodology for determining the risk parameters of the stock market and deposit market of Moscow Exchange PJSC by NCO NCC (JSC), on 07.05.2025, 11-14 (Moscow time), the values of the upper limit of the price corridor (up to 89.76) and the range of market risk assessment (up to 925.53 rubles, equivalent to a rate of 7.5%) of the RU000A100VG7 (SUEK-F1P3R) security were changed.

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    Please Note; This Information is Raw Content Directly from the Information Source. It is access to What the Source Is Stating and Does Not Reflect

    HTTPS: //VVV. MEEX.K.M.M.

    MIL OSI Russia News –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Russia has acted to obfuscate and embolden the DPRK’s unlawful pursuit of weapons of mass destruction: UK statement at the UN Security Council

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Speech

    Russia has acted to obfuscate and embolden the DPRK’s unlawful pursuit of weapons of mass destruction: UK statement at the UN Security Council

    Statement by Ambassador James Kariuki, UK Deputy Permanent Representative to the UN, at the UN Security Council meeting on North Korea.

    Analysis from organisations like the Open Source Centre has become even more vital in the wake of the expertise gap left by the 1718 Panel of Experts.

    One year on, the UK deeply regrets Russia’s decision to veto the mandate renewal of the 1718 Panel of Experts.

    This was a deliberate act used to obfuscate and embolden the DPRK’s unlawful pursuit of weapons of mass destruction, and to conceal Russia’s own erosion of the UN sanctions architecture, which it has a responsibility to uphold as a permanent member of this Council.

    The Panel’s credible, objective and independent reporting enabled this Council and the international community to effectively monitor the implementation of UN sanctions on the DPRK.

    Most importantly, the Panel helped prevent the DPRK’s unlawful and dangerous development of nuclear and ballistic missile programmes.

    Since Russia’s veto last year, there have been over 40 missile tests, including one intercontinental ballistic missile test and one intermediate-range ballistic missile test.  

    This escalation represents multiple breaches of UN Security Council resolutions, for which we have been deprived of further analysis.

    Colleagues, it is obvious that Russia’s objective was to clear the path for the expansion of their military relationship with the DPRK.

    The DPRK is believed to have supplied 20,000 containers of munitions to Russia, and its artillery and mortar shells account for 60% of those used in Russia’s brutal war of aggression against Ukraine.

    And as we’ve heard, in the past week, Russia and the DPRK publicly flaunted their agreement to use DPRK troops as mere cannon fodder in that war.

    Let me be clear, we cannot allow this brazen disregard towards UN sanctions to become normalised. 

    The UK will continue to work closely with partners to monitor sanctions evasion, to hold both Russia and the DPRK to account, and to call out those complicit in the DPRK’s violations of UN Security Council resolutions.

    As we have heard over the course of the NPT Prepcom, this Council should stand firm in its defence of the global non-proliferation regime.

    The UK remains steadfast with partners in our shared goal for the DPRK to abandon all nuclear weapons, other weapons of mass destruction and ballistic missile programs in a complete, verifiable and irreversible manner.

    Updates to this page

    Published 7 May 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Russia: The US Federal Reserve left the interest rate unchanged at 4.25-4.5 percent.

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: People’s Republic of China in Russian – People’s Republic of China in Russian –

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    WASHINGTON, May 7 (Xinhua) — The U.S. Federal Reserve on Wednesday left its target range for the federal funds rate unchanged at 4.25 percent to 4.5 percent amid expectations that the Trump administration’s tariff policies will lead to higher inflation and slower economic growth.

    “Uncertainty about the economic outlook is increasing,” the Federal Open Market Committee, the Fed’s policymaking arm, said in a statement following its two-day meeting.

    “The Committee closely monitors the risks to both sides of its dual mandate and believes that the threats to higher unemployment and inflation have increased,” the statement said.

    With tariff chaos deepening and inflation risks resurfacing, economists and market participants are increasingly concerned about a slowdown in economic growth, and some are worried about a hit to the labor market and a possible recession. In this regard, Fed officials have also expressed their concerns.

    “I wouldn’t be surprised if you start to see more layoffs and higher unemployment going forward, especially if the big tariffs come back,” Fed Governor Christopher Waller said in a recent interview with Bloomberg. “I would expect to see more rate cuts, and sooner rather than later, as soon as there’s a significant deterioration in the labor market,” he added. –0–

    MIL OSI Russia News –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Russia: Leaders of Belarus and Guinea-Bissau held talks in Minsk

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: People’s Republic of China in Russian – People’s Republic of China in Russian –

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    MINSK, May 7 (Xinhua) — Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko and Guinea-Bissau President Oumarou Sisoko Embalo held talks in Minsk on Wednesday. The Belarusian leader announced his readiness to establish cooperation with the African country in all areas. The corresponding information was published by the press service of the Belarusian head of state.

    According to A. Lukashenko, Belarus is ready to supply Guinea-Bissau with a wide range of necessary products, including food, clothing, footwear, and industrial goods. “I know that you really need to develop agriculture to the highest level. You probably understand very well that we are capable of providing you with the appropriate technological and technical support and services. You can count on us in this regard,” A. Lukashenko said.

    In turn, U. Sisoku Embalo noted that Belarus’s vast experience in developing the agro-industrial complex is of great interest to his country. “We know that Belarus has accumulated vast experience in the agro-industrial complex. We would like to take advantage of this experience and thus open a kind of door to the future. I very much count on cooperation with Belarus,” he emphasized.

    On the same day, representatives of Belarus and Guinea-Bissau signed documents aimed at strengthening bilateral cooperation. Among them is an intergovernmental agreement on the abolition of visas for holders of diplomatic, official and service passports. A memorandum of cooperation in the field of agriculture was also signed. In addition, the parties signed a memorandum of cooperation between the Ministry of Industry of Belarus and the Ministry of Trade and Industry of Guinea-Bissau. –0–

    MIL OSI Russia News –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Russia: Xi Jinping congratulates participants of Chinese-Russian cultural and humanitarian exchange event

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: People’s Republic of China in Russian – People’s Republic of China in Russian –

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    BEIJING, May 7 (Xinhua) — Chinese President Xi Jinping on Wednesday sent a congratulatory message to participants in a China-Russia cultural and humanitarian exchange event dedicated to the 80th anniversary of the victory in the Chinese People’s War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression and the Great Patriotic War.

    In his message, the Chinese leader noted that 80 years ago, the Chinese and Russian peoples jointly made an indelible historical contribution to the victory in the World Anti-Fascist War and sealed with blood an unbreakable great friendship, laying a solid foundation for the high-level development of interstate relations.

    Xi said that after 80 years, thanks to the joint efforts of both sides, China-Russia ties have shown new vitality and set a new model for major power relations.

    He stressed that strengthening cultural and humanitarian exchanges is of great and profound significance for increasing mutual understanding, strengthening good-neighborliness and friendship, and increasing public and popular support for the development of bilateral relations.

    The Chinese President expressed the hope that the media of both countries will take on a common mission and move forward hand in hand, conducting cultural and humanitarian exchanges that connect peoples, are close to life and filled with warmth. According to the Chinese leader, this will give new impetus to deepening mutual understanding and friendship between the peoples of the two countries, add new luster to the Sino-Russian relations of comprehensive strategic partnership and coordination in the new era, and make new contributions to building a community with a shared future for mankind.

    The event was organized by China Media Corporation and the All-Russian State Television and Radio Broadcasting Company.

    On the same day, Russian President Vladimir Putin also sent a congratulatory message to the participants of the event. –0–

    MIL OSI Russia News –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Russia: IMF Executive Board Approves Extensions of the Extended Credit Facility Arrangement and the Resilience and Sustainability Facility Arrangement with Cabo Verde

    Source: IMF – News in Russian

    May 7, 2025

    Washington, DC—May 7, 2025: The Executive Board of the International Monetary Fund approved the Cabo Verdean authorities’ request for an extension of the country’s Extended Credit Facility (ECF) Arrangement until September 15, 2025, and for an extension of the Resilience and Sustainability Facility (RSF) Arrangement until September 11, 2025, to allow additional time for completing the sixth ECF and third RSF reviews.

    The three-year ECF arrangement was approved by the IMF’s Executive Board on June 15, 2022, with access of SDR 45.03 million (190 percent of quota) (see Press Release no 22/202). The 18-month RSF arrangement was approved on December 11, 2023, with access of SDR 23.7 million (100 percent of quota) (see Press Release no 23/436).

    The Executive Board’s decision was taken on a lapse-of-time basis[1].

    [1] The Executive Board takes decisions under its lapse-of-time procedure when a proposal can be considered without convening formal discussions.

    IMF Communications Department
    MEDIA RELATIONS

    PRESS OFFICER: Kwabena Akuamoah-Boateng

    Phone: +1 202 623-7100Email: MEDIA@IMF.org

    @IMFSpokesperson

    https://www.imf.org/en/News/Articles/2025/05/07/pr-25133-cabo-verde-imf-approves-extensions-of-ecf-arrangement-and-rsf-arrangement

    MIL OSI

    MIL OSI Russia News –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Russia: IMF Executive Board Concludes 2025 Article IV Consultation with Guyana

    Source: IMF – News in Russian

    May 7, 2025

    Washington, DC: The Executive Board of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) concluded the Article IV Consultation with Guyana.[1]

    Guyana’s economic transformation is advancing strongly and broadening in scale. Rapidly expanding oil production, strong non-oil output, and large-scale public infrastructure investment supported the highest real GDP growth rate in the world, averaging 47 percent per year since 2022. Real oil GDP increased by nearly 58 percent in 2024, while real non-oil GDP expanded over 13 percent, reflecting a solid broad-based performance across sectors. Inflation reached 2.9 percent by end-2024, from 2 percent at end-2023, driven largely by higher food prices (affected by international food prices and earlier floods). The overall fiscal deficit widened from 5.1 percent of GDP (11.7 percent of non-oil GDP) in 2022 to 7.3 percent of GDP (21 percent of non-oil GDP) in 2024 reflecting a large increase in capital expenditure. Driven by higher oil exports, Guyana’s current account surplus more than doubled in 2024, reaching about 24½ percent of GDP. By end-2024, gross international reserves surpassed US$1 billion, while the Natural Resource Fund (NRF) accumulated over US$1.1 billion in 2024, reaching US$3.1 billion (over 12½ percent of GDP). 

    The economic outlook remains highly favorable. The economy is expected to grow on average 14 percent per year over the next five years, driven by robust oil production and strong non-oil GDP growth. Positive spillovers from the oil sector and improvements in infrastructure, productivity, and resilience are expected to boost the real non-oil GDP growth to an average of 6¾ percent over the medium term, about 3 percentage points higher than the pre-oil decade average. While inflation is projected to edge up to around 4 percent in 2025, the overall fiscal deficit and the current account surplus are expected to narrow in 2025. Over the medium term, the continued expansion of oil production will further strengthen the external position, with substantial savings accumulation in the NRF.

    Risks to the outlook are broadly balanced. On the upside, additional oil discoveries and productivity-enhancing investments, including to strengthen energy resilience would further bolster Guyana’s long-term economic prospects, while expanding construction activity would support higher short-term non-oil GDP growth. Downside risks stem from overheating pressures which, if not contained, would lead to higher inflation and a real exchange rate appreciation beyond the level consistent with a balanced expansion of the economy. Commodity price volatility in a highly uncertain global environment, including from trade policy and climate shocks could also adversely affect inflation and alter the macroeconomic outlook.

    Executive Board Assessment[2]

    Executive Directors agreed with the thrust of the staff appraisal. They welcomed Guyana’s remarkable economic progress to attain high-income status, supported by rapidly expanding oil production and robust non-oil growth. They noted that Guyana’s economic outlook remains highly favorable with balanced risks, strong fundamentals, and a strong external position supported by substantial accumulation of oil revenue in the Natural Resource Fund. They commended the authorities’ commitment to balancing development needs with prudent policies to entrench macroeconomic and fiscal stability.

    Directors concurred that the current fiscal stance is appropriate given development needs. They welcomed the authorities’ commitment to eliminate the overall fiscal deficit over the medium term and further narrow the non-oil primary deficit to levels consistent with ensuring intergenerational equity and preserving fiscal and macroeconomic sustainability. They highlighted the need for a comprehensive medium-term fiscal framework with an explicit anchor and an operational target, along with regular assessments of expenditure related to reaching development objectives. They positively noted the authorities’ continued efforts to strengthen public financial management as well as the low risk of debt distress given low public debt.

    Directors considered the monetary policy stance as appropriately tight to help contain inflation, while noting the need for further tightening if inflation risks escalate. They saw merit in enhancing the monetary policy toolkit and deepening financial markets to help strengthen the effectiveness of monetary policy transmission. They emphasized the need for maintaining consistent policies to support the stabilized exchange rate arrangement, which remains appropriate, and saw merit in assessing whether transitioning to a more flexible exchange rate regime over the medium term could be beneficial as Guyana’s economy continues to transform.

    Directors welcomed the authorities’ commitment to maintain financial stability and continue enhancing financial supervision, including monitoring sectoral lending exposures and related-party lending. They supported the authorities’ efforts to further strengthen risk monitoring, strengthen the macroprudential framework, broaden regulatory coverage, and enhance statistics on balance sheets and real estate prices.

    Directors welcomed the authorities’ efforts to foster inclusive growth and economic diversification, improve the business environment, strengthen climate and energy resilience, and enhance labor market skills. They commended progress in strengthening governance, anti-corruption, official statistics, AML/CFT frameworks, fiscal transparency, and transparency in extractive industries, and supported the continued efforts to strengthen them in line with international standards.

    It is expected that the next Article IV consultation with Guyana will be held on the standard 12-month cycle.

    Table 1. Guyana: Selected Social and Economic Indicators

     

    I.  Social Indicators

     

    Population, 2023 (thousands)

       814

    Life expectancy at birth (years), 2022

    66

     

    Under-five mortality rate (per 1,000 live births), 2023

    14

    Human Development Index rank, 2022

    95

    II.  Economic Indicators

     

    Prel.

    Proj.

    2023

    2024

    2025

    (Year-over-year percent change)

    Production and Prices

    Real GDP

    33.8

    43.6

    10.3

    Real non-oil GDP

    12.3

    13.1

    12.9

    Real oil GDP

    46.8

    57.7

    9.5

    Consumer prices (end of period)

    2.0

    2.9

    4.2

    (Percent of non-oil GDP)

    Central Government

    Revenue

    39.3

    43.7

    49.9

    Grants

    0.2

    0.2

    0.4

    Expenditure

    52.7

    64.9

    63.4

    Current

    25.1

    28.9

    30.5

    Capital

    27.7

    36.0

    32.9

    Overall balance (after grants)

    -13.3

    -21.0

    -13.2

    Non-oil primary balance (after grants)

    -26.2

     

    -38.4

     

    -37.5

    (Percent of GDP)

    Revenue

    17.0

    15.3

    18.6

    Grants

    0.1

    0.1

    0.1

    Expenditure

    22.8

    22.6

    23.7

    Current

    10.8

    10.1

    11.4

    Capital

    12.0

    12.6

    12.3

    Overall balance (after grants)

    -5.7

    -7.3

    -4.9

    Total public sector gross debt

    26.7

    24.3

    28.0

    External

    10.5

    9.0

    13.6

    Domestic

    16.2

    15.2

    14.4

     

    Table 1. Guyana: Selected Social and Economic Indicators (Concluded)

    Prel.

    Proj.

    2023

    2024

    2025

    (Year-over-year percent change)

    Money and Credit

    Broad money

    27.6

    25.3

    17.7

    Domestic credit of the banking system

    24.1

    39.7

    4.9

    External Sector

    Current account balance (US$ million)

    1,679.9

    6,067.9

    2,306.2

       (Percent of GDP)

    9.9

    24.6

    8.9

    Gross official reserves (US$ million)

    896.4

    1,010.1

    1,571.4

    (Percent of GDP)

    5.3

    4.1

    6.1

    Crude oil production (million barrels)

    142.3

    225.4

    246.0

    Memorandum Items:

    Nominal GDP (GY$ billion)

    3,527.5

    5,141.3

    5,383.9

    Nominal non-oil GDP (GY$ billion)

    1,524.6

    1,793.7

    2,010.7

    GDP per capita (US$)

    21,307.2

    30,962.3

    32,326.3

    Guyana dollar/U.S. dollar (period average)

    208.5

    208.5 

    … 

    Sources: Guyana’s authorities; UNDP Human Development Report; World Bank; and IMF staff calculations and projections.

    [1] Under Article IV of the IMF’s Articles of Agreement, the IMF holds bilateral discussions with members, usually every year. A staff team visits the country, collects economic and financial information, and discusses with officials the country’s economic developments and policies. On return to headquarters, the staff prepares a report, which forms the basis for discussion by the Executive Board.

    [2] At the conclusion of the discussion, the Managing Director, as Chair of the Board, summarizes the views of Executive Directors, and this summary is transmitted to the country’s authorities. An explanation of any qualifiers used in summings up can be found here: http://www.IMF.org/external/np/sec/misc/qualifiers.htm.

    IMF Communications Department
    MEDIA RELATIONS

    PRESS OFFICER: Rosa Hernandez

    Phone: +1 202 623-7100Email: MEDIA@IMF.org

    @IMFSpokesperson

    https://www.imf.org/en/News/Articles/2025/05/07/pr-25132-guyana-imf-executive-board-concludes-2025-article-iv-consultation

    MIL OSI

    MIL OSI Russia News –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Ranking Member Hoyer Remarks at U.S. Department of the Treasury Oversight Hearing

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Steny H Hoyer (MD-05)

    WASHINGTON, DC – Today, Congressman Steny Hoyer (MD-05), Ranking Member of the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Financial Services and General Government (FSGG), delivered the following remarks at the subcommittee’s oversight hearing on the Department of the Treasury:

    Click here to watch a full video of his remarks.
     

    “Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman, and welcome, Mr. Secretary. This is our first substantive hearing dealing with the devastating actions that the Trump Administration has taken in the first three months of 2025 – actions planned and predicted by Project 2025. I look forward to having more such hearings with other agencies under our jurisdiction – especially the principals of DOGE, OMB, GSA, and OPM, which are having such a profoundly negative impact on our country.

    “What we’ve seen in the first 100 days of this administration is unprecedented, and – so the polls tell us – disturbing to the American people. An irresponsible, incoherent tariff policy has plunged the Americans and global economies into chaos. These past three months, the American economy shrank for the first time since the final days of the pandemic. The stock market fell more in the first 100 days of the Trump Administration than in the first 100 days of any presidency in the past half century. Consumer confidence is [at its] lowest since May of 2020 – the height of Covid-19. That uncertainty has also rattled the bond market, with investors dangerously starting to doubt the full faith and credit of the United States.

    “Most importantly, Americans are hurting. Families see their costs going up. Retirees watch their life savings losing value. Small business owners and farmers risk going under as they struggle to navigate ever-changing tariffs. Our economy is in chaos and so, I think, is our government.

    “Donald Trump, Russell Vought, and Elon Musk are orchestrating an illegal purge of our federal employees. They clearly had a lot of ideas on how to remove these people and dismantle these programs as quickly as possible. Sadly, they had no clue, in my view, as to the devastating consequences of their actions on our country, our government, our allies, and the professionals we rely on to serve the American people.

    “I am particularly concerned about the Internal Revenue Service, which has been severely understaffed and underfunded for decades. So far, the Trump Administration has forced the IRS to cut as many as 11,443 employees – or over 11 percent of its staff. That includes 6,700 workers who were fired at the height of this most recent tax season. Now, the administration is planning to reduce the IRS workforce, I understand, by another 40,000 jobs – or 40 percent. That includes up to half of IRS enforcement staff. Additionally, Trump’s 2026 budget cuts funding for the IRS by 20 percent. These actions at IRS, in my view, and every other government office, have bludgeoned morale, destroyed efficiency, and increased waste.

    “Cutting back on IRS enforcement makes it easier for the wealthiest individuals and corporations to cheat on their taxes and get out of paying what they owe. That, of course, increases what others pay and explodes the deficit. As the President and Congressional Republicans undermine the ability to enforce our existing tax code, they are also pursuing massive tax cuts for the wealthiest among us.

    “Furthermore, DOGE operatives are rifling through IRS databases that contain Americans’ sensitive information, including their financial history, Social Security numbers, immigration status, and more. The story is the same across the federal government. Americans are reeling from this uncertainty in their economy and in their government. They need answers. More than that, they need an adult in the room. That is the role, I hope, the Treasury Department plays – and Mr. Secretary, in particular, yourself.

    “The economy and markets do not lie. We all depend on the Treasury Secretary to communicate clearly and transparently to the President, the Congress, the American people, and, indeed, the world. I’ve mentioned tariffs and the IRS, but I’m also eager to hear, Mr. Secretary from you about our economic approach to the Russian-Ukraine war – especially in light of last week’s mineral deal and recent questions about our sanctions regime on Russia.

    “Former Secretary Mnuchin – whom I believe you know, sir – and I disagreed on some things, but we still found ways to work in a bipartisan fashion to inspire confidence in the economy. Mr. Secretary, I look forward to doing the same with you. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.”

    MIL OSI USA News –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Russia: Beijing to host first World Humanoid Robot Games

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: People’s Republic of China in Russian – People’s Republic of China in Russian –

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    BEIJING, May 7 (Xinhua) — China’s capital Beijing will host the 2025 World Robot Conference and the first World Humanoid Robot Games in August, it was announced at a press conference on Wednesday.

    The Robotics Conference will run from August 8 to 12, and the Games from August 15 to 17. These events will showcase cutting-edge advances in robotics and foster greater global collaboration in the industry.

    According to the organizers, in 2025 the program of the World Robotics Conference includes forums, exhibitions and networking events, where about 200 specialized companies will present their latest developments.

    Vice Chairman of the Board and Secretary General of the China Electronics Society Chen Ying noted the expansion of international participation. More than 30 international organizations, over 30 world-renowned experts and over 100 international teams are expected to take part in the events. The share of foreign exhibitors will exceed 20 percent.

    The core program of the games, the world’s first multi-discipline competition for humanoid robots, will include tests of their athletic and functional skills in such disciplines as track and field, football, dance, carrying objects and sorting medicine. Additional competitions in badminton, table tennis and basketball will emphasize entertainment and interaction with spectators.

    According to Jiang Guangzhi, head of the Beijing City Bureau of Economy and Information Technology, the games will demonstrate how close robots’ capabilities are to the human ideal. –0–

    MIL OSI Russia News –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Russia: China issues emergency response and disaster warnings

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: People’s Republic of China in Russian – People’s Republic of China in Russian –

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    BEIJING, May 7 (Xinhua) — Chinese authorities on Wednesday issued an emergency response and several warnings over impending or possible natural disasters.

    China’s National Meteorological Center (NMC) issued a blue alert for heavy rain and severe convective phenomena, while the China Meteorological Administration (CMA) issued a level 3 emergency response for meteorological disasters.

    According to the NMC forecast, from 20:00 on May 7 to 20:00 on May 8, thunderstorms, gales and hail are expected in some parts of the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, the provinces of Jilin, Liaoning, Hebei, Shanxi, Anhui, Hubei, Guizhou, Hunan and Jiangxi, as well as the centrally subordinate municipalities of Beijing and Chongqing. In addition, winds with a force of over 11 on the Chinese scale (28.5-32.6 meters per second) are forecast in some areas of the provinces of Hunan, Jiangxi, Guizhou and the city of Chongqing.

    The Ministry of Water Resources of China jointly with the CMU issued a yellow alert due to the threat of mountain torrents in some areas of Anhui, Jiangxi, Henan, Hubei and Hunan provinces.

    In addition, a yellow alert was issued on Wednesday for meteorological risks of geological disasters, with relatively high risks observed in parts of Anhui, Guangdong, Guizhou and Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region.

    Local authorities are instructed to closely monitor weather conditions in real time, issue early warnings of possible flooding and carry out evacuation measures if necessary, while the population is advised to take precautions when in risky areas.

    China has a four-tier weather warning system, with red representing the highest level of danger, followed by orange, yellow and blue. The emergency response system also has four levels, with level 1 being the most serious. –0–

    MIL OSI Russia News –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Russia: Breaking: US Federal Reserve leaves interest rate unchanged at 4.25-4.5 percent

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: People’s Republic of China in Russian – People’s Republic of China in Russian –

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    Xinhua | 08. 05. 2025

    Keywords: us fed, level, percent, left, changes, rate, urgently, president donald trump, slowing economic growth, background of expectations, federal funds, administration policy, increasing inflation, rate range, fed, us

    WASHINGTON, May 7 (Xinhua) — The U.S. Federal Reserve on Wednesday left its target range for the federal funds rate unchanged at 4.25 percent to 4.5 percent amid expectations that the Trump administration’s tariff policies will lead to higher inflation and slower economic growth. –0–

    Source: Xinhua

    Breaking News: US Federal Reserve Leaves Interest Rate Unchanged at 4.25-4.5 Percent Breaking News: US Federal Reserve Leaves Interest Rate Unchanged at 4.25-4.5 Percent

    MIL OSI Russia News –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Russia: Georgian Prime Minister I. Kobakhidze Elected Chairman of the Georgian Dream Party

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: People’s Republic of China in Russian – People’s Republic of China in Russian –

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    Tbilisi, May 7 (Xinhua) — The Georgian Dream party, Georgia’s ruling party, will be led by Prime Minister Irakli Kobakhidze.

    The congress of the Georgian Dream, which took place on Wednesday, unanimously elected I. Kobakhidze as the party chairman. I. Kobakhidze took this post for the second time.

    The congress also presented the updated composition of the party’s political council.

    The position of the chairman of the Georgian Dream party became vacant after its former chairman Irakli Garibashvili decided to leave the party and politics. I. Garibashvili made the corresponding statement on April 25. –0–

    MIL OSI Russia News –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Russia: The Central Bank of Georgia kept the monetary policy rate at 8 percent.

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: People’s Republic of China in Russian – People’s Republic of China in Russian –

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    Tbilisi, May 7 /Xinhua/ — The Monetary Policy Committee of the National Bank of Georgia (NBG, Central Bank) decided at a meeting on Wednesday to once again keep the monetary policy rate (refinancing rate) unchanged at 8 percent, the Central Bank reported.

    The NBG noted that inflation in Georgia remains below the target of 3 percent.

    Given the relatively slow normalization of fundamental factors in the economy and continued high economic growth, the baseline scenario has revised the forecast for real GDP growth in 2025 from 5 percent to 6.7 percent. In the long term, growth is expected to stabilize at around 5 percent.

    The NBG announced its intention to use all instruments to ensure price stability so that the overall level of price growth in the medium term remains close to 3%.

    The Central Bank’s statement indicates that further rate changes will depend on risk analysis and updated macroeconomic forecasts based on it. –0–

    MIL OSI Russia News –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Russia: China and Russia have found the right way for large neighboring countries to coexist – Xi Jinping

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: People’s Republic of China in Russian – People’s Republic of China in Russian –

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    Moscow, May 7 /Xinhua/ — China and Russia have found the right path for coexistence between large neighboring countries, Chinese President Xi Jinping said in the Russian capital on Wednesday.

    Xi Jinping made the statement in a written speech published upon his arrival in Moscow on a state visit and to attend events marking the 80th anniversary of Victory in the Great Patriotic War.

    The Chinese leader noted that China and Russia are inseparable good neighbors, true friends who endure adversity together, and reliable partners who contribute to each other’s success. The two sides have formed the spirit of Chinese-Russian strategic interaction in the new era, which is characterized by eternal good-neighborly friendship, comprehensive strategic interaction and cooperation for mutual benefit and common gain, Xi Jinping stated.

    According to the Chinese President, independent, mature and strong China-Russia relations not only bring great benefits to the peoples of the two countries, but also make an important contribution to maintaining global strategic stability and building an equal and orderly multipolar world.

    This year, the Chinese leader recalled, marks the 80th anniversary of the victory in the World Anti-Fascist War and the 80th anniversary of the founding of the United Nations.

    China and Russia, as important major countries in the world and permanent members of the UN Security Council, will uphold the victory in World War II, firmly safeguard the international system with the UN at its core and the international order based on international law, resolutely oppose hegemonism and power politics, adhere to genuine multilateralism, and promote the building of a more just and reasonable global governance system, Xi Jinping said.

    The Chinese President also announced that during his state visit to Russia, he will hold in-depth communication with Russian President Vladimir Putin on bilateral relations and practical cooperation, as well as on significant international and regional issues of mutual interest. This, he said, will give a powerful impetus to the development of Chinese-Russian relations of comprehensive partnership and strategic interaction in the new era.

    Recalling that a decade later he will again attend the Victory Day celebrations in Russia on May 9, Xi Jinping said that he hopes to honor with deep feeling the memory of the heroes who died in the struggle for victory in the World Anti-Fascist War together with the leaders of many countries and the Russian people, and to act as a powerful voice of the times in defense of international honesty and justice.

    After Xi Jinping’s plane entered Russian airspace, it was escorted by Russian Air Force aircraft.

    Upon arrival of the PRC Chairman at Moscow’s Vnukovo Airport, he was warmly greeted by Deputy Prime Minister of the Russian Federation Tatyana Golikova and other high-ranking officials. –0–

    MIL OSI Russia News –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Russia: Armenian Prime Minister to Attend Victory Parade in Moscow

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: People’s Republic of China in Russian – People’s Republic of China in Russian –

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    Yerevan, May 7 (Xinhua) — Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan will travel to Moscow on May 9 to attend a parade dedicated to the 80th anniversary of the victory in the Great Patriotic War, the head of the Armenian government said in the country’s parliament on Wednesday.

    N. Pashinyan confirmed that he accepted the invitation from Russian President Vladimir Putin, received during a telephone conversation on March 14. At the same time, he did not rule out the possibility of holding bilateral meetings with leaders of other countries on the sidelines of the festive events.

    During World War II, about 600,000 Armenian soldiers fought in the ranks of the Soviet and Allied armies, almost half of whom were drafted from Armenia. About 200,000 fighters did not return from the battlefield. –0–

    MIL OSI Russia News –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Cotton to Gabbard: Do Not Assist German Surveillance of Political Opposition

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Arkansas Tom Cotton
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASEContact: Caroline Tabler or Patrick McCann (202) 224-2353May 7, 2025
    Cotton to Gabbard: Do Not Assist German Surveillance of Political Opposition
    Washington, D.C. — Senator Tom Cotton (R-Arkansas) today sent a letter to Tulsi Gabbard, the Director of National Intelligence requesting a pause on all intelligence sharing with Germany’s domestic intelligence agency, the BvF, that could be used to target political opponents. This letter comes after the BvF’s recent classification of German opposition party Alternative for Germany (AfD) as a “proven right-wing extremist organization.”
    In part, Senator Cotton wrote: 
    “I understand that liberal elites on both sides of the Atlantic loathe the AfD, but AfD’s platform has resonated with many Germans. Unsurprisingly so, since an agenda of strong borders, energy independence, and economic growth has appealed to our own electorate and may other Western democracies. Rather than trying to undermine the AfD using the tools of authoritarian states, Germany’s incoming government might be better advised to consider why the AfD continues to gain electoral ground and how German’s government can address the reasonable concerns of its citizens.”
    Full text of the letter may be found here and below. 
    The Honorable Tulsi Gabbard
    Director of National Intelligence 
    1500 Tysons McLean Drive 
    McLean, VA 22102
    Dear Director Gabbard:
    In support of the Trump administration’s goals to prevent the weaponization of our nation’s intelligence agencies, I urge you to ensure that foreign intelligence collected by those agencies isn’t shared with the German government to be used against its political opposition.
    On May 2, Germany’s domestic intelligence agency, the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution (BfV) classified the Alternative for Germany (AfD) Party as a “proven right-wing extremist organization.” Under German law, this decision allows BfV to intensify surveillance on AfD through signals collection and the use of undercover informants to support a potential party ban. In other words, German intelligence can now eavesdrop, monitor, and infiltrate Germany’s main opposition party and its second largest vote-getter in the recent elections. One would expect such police-state activities in dictatorships like Communist China and Russia—not Western Europe’s largest country. 
    I understand that liberal elites on both sides of the Atlantic loathe the AfD, but AfD’s platform has resonated with many Germans. Unsurprisingly so, since an agenda of strong borders, energy independence, and economic growth has appealed to our own electorate and may other Western democracies. Rather than trying to undermine the AfD using the tools of authoritarian states, Germany’s incoming government might be better advised to consider why the AfD continues to gain electoral ground and how the German government can address the reasonable concerns of its citizens. 
    Until the German government treats the AfD as a legitimate opposition party and not as a “right-wing extremist organization,” I ask that you direct our intelligence agencies to take the follow actions:
    Pause the sharing of intelligence with BfV that could be used to target the AfD,
    Refuse requests of assistance from the BfV to surveil AfD and its members, and
    Review whether our intelligence agencies under the Biden administration cooperated with German requests to surveil the AfD or other opposition parties and notify the Senate of the findings of the review.
    Sincerely,
    Tom Cotton
    Chairman

    MIL OSI USA News –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: Silvaco Reports First Quarter 2025 Financial Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Achieved gross bookings of $13.7 million and revenue of $14.1 million in the first quarter 2025

    Signed 9 new customers in the first quarter 2025 and expanded relationship with existing customers across key markets including AI, Photonics, and IoT

    Expanded Product Portfolio with the Acquisition of Tech-X Corporation

    SANTA CLARA, Calif., May 07, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Silvaco Group, Inc. (Nasdaq: SVCO) (“Silvaco” or the “Company”), a provider of TCAD, EDA software, and SIP solutions that enable innovative semiconductor design and digital twin modeling through AI software and automation, today announced its first quarter 2025 results.

    “We are pleased to have completed our first acquisition since our IPO in the first quarter of 2025, and have since announced our second acquisition of 2025, advancing our inorganic growth strategy and expanding our product portfolio,” said Dr. Babak Taheri, Silvaco’s Chief Executive Officer. Dr. Taheri continued, “We believe our solid fundamentals and focus on innovation position us to sustain strong customer momentum and drive continued growth in our EDA and TCAD product lines through 2025. We are committed to defending shareholder value through performance, transparency, and responsible capital management. We believe the fundamentals of Silvaco are strong—and we’re taking clear, measurable steps to align our market presence with the long-term strength of our business.”

    Commenting on the financial results and outlook, Keith Tainsky, Silvaco’s Interim Chief Financial Officer, added, “Given the current economic uncertainty, we have provided a broad guidance range for the second quarter of 2025. The company remains well positioned to deliver solid growth, supported by strong customer demand. We also updated our full-year guidance and remain confident in our ability to achieve our strategic and financial objectives.”

    First Quarter 2025 and Recent Business Highlights

    • Acquired 9 new customers across key markets including AI infrastructure (Power, Memory, Foundry) Photonics, and IoT markets, which represented approximately 23% of gross bookings for the quarter. We also expanded opportunities with existing customers, which accounted for 38% of gross bookings.
    • Gained momentum with Power, Photonics, and Advanced CMOS customers as they expand adoption of the FTCO platform for their next-generation product development. We announced that Excelliance MOS adopted Silvaco DTCO Flow for next generation silicon carbide devices and our partnership with Korean Kyung Hee University’s Professor Jin Jang on FTCO for next generation display technologies.
    • Expanded SAM by an estimated $600 million with the acquisitions of Cadence’s PPC product line and Tech-X Corporation.
    • Faraday Technology selected Silvaco FlexCAN IP for advanced automotive ASIC design.
    • ProMOS adopted our Victory TCAD solution for the development of next generation silicon photonics devices.
    • On April 29, 2025, Silvaco closed the acquisition of Tech-X Corporation, expanding our product offerings into wafer-level and photonics digital twin modeling.
    • Beginning with this quarter, we will be providing a new performance metric called Annual Contract Value, or ACV. We use ACV internally as a supplemental measure to evaluate the performance of our customer agreements and the underlying momentum of the business. While not a measure calculated in accordance with GAAP, we believe ACV provides additional insight into the scale and timing of customer commitments, which may not be fully reflected in recognized revenue due to the timing of revenue recognition under ASC 606.

    First Quarter 2025 Financial Results

    GAAP Financial Results

    • Revenue of $14.1 million, down 11% year-over-year and down 21% quarter-over-quarter.
      • TCAD revenue of $7.9 million, down 26% year-over-year, primarily due to earlier renewals last year.
      • EDA revenue of $5.1 million, up 8% year-over-year, including the addition of PPC product revenue of $1.9 million.
      • SIP revenue of $1.1 million, up 89% year-over-year, primarily driven by new bookings in automotive and IoT customers.
    • GAAP gross profit and GAAP gross margin were $11.1 million and 79%, respectively, which includes the impact of $0.2 million in stock-based compensation expense, and $0.2 million in amortization of acquired intangible assets, down from $13.9 million and 88% in Q1 2024.
    • GAAP net loss of $19.3 million, compared to a GAAP net income of $1.4 million in Q1 2024.
    • GAAP basic net loss per share of $(0.67), compared to GAAP basic and diluted net income per share of $0.07 in Q1 2024.
    • As of March 31, 2025, cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities totaled $74.5 million.

    Key Operating Indicators and Non-GAAP Financial Results:

    • Gross bookings were $13.7 million, down 15% year-over-year.
    • As of March 31, 2025, the remaining performance obligation balance of $33.7 million, 45% of which is expected to be recognized as revenue in the next 12 months.
    • Non-GAAP gross profit and non-GAAP gross margin were $11.5 million and 82%, respectively, down from $13.9 million and 88% in Q1 2024.
    • Non-GAAP net loss of $1.9 million, compared to non-GAAP net income of $2.4 million in Q1 2024.
    • Non-GAAP diluted net loss per share of $(0.07), compared to non-GAAP diluted net income per share of $0.12 in Q1 2024.
    • On a trailing-twelve-month (TTM) basis ACV was $52.3 million for the first quarter, up 21% year-over-year. This increase was driven by the amount of growth in organic growth of term-based licenses and renewals, as well as the acquisition of PPC. While quarterly revenue may fluctuate, core annual recurring revenue from new bookings has shown consistent annual growth.

    For a discussion of the non-GAAP metrics presented in this press release, as well as a reconciliation of non-GAAP metrics to the nearest comparable GAAP metric, see “Discussion of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Key Business Metrics” and “GAAP to Non-GAAP Reconciliation” in the accompanying tables below.

    Supplementary materials to this press release, including first quarter 2025 financial results, can be found at https://investors.silvaco.com/financial-information/quarterly-results.

    Second Quarter and Full Year 2025 Financial Outlook

    As of May 7, 2025, Silvaco is providing updated guidance for its second quarter of 2025 and its full-year 2025, which represents Silvaco’s current estimates on its operations and financial results. The financial information below represents forward-looking financial information and in some instances forward-looking, non-GAAP financial information, including estimates of non-GAAP gross margin, non-GAAP operating income (loss) and non-GAAP diluted net income (loss) per share. GAAP gross margin is the most comparable GAAP measure to non-GAAP gross margin and GAAP operating income (loss) is the most comparable GAAP measure to non-GAAP operating income (loss). GAAP diluted net income (loss) per share is the most comparable GAAP measure to non-GAAP diluted net income (loss) per share. Non-GAAP gross margin differs from GAAP gross margin in that it excludes items such as stock-based compensation expense, amortization of acquired intangible assets, and acquisition-related professional fees and retention bonuses. Non-GAAP operating income (loss) differs from GAAP operating income (loss) in that it excludes items such as acquisition-related estimated litigation claim and legal costs, stock-based compensation expense, amortization of acquired intangible assets, acquisition-related professional fees and retention bonuses and IPO preparation costs. Non-GAAP diluted net income (loss) per share differs from GAAP diluted net income (loss) per share in that it excludes certain costs, including IPO preparation costs, acquisition-related estimated litigation claim and legal costs, stock-based compensation expense, amortization of acquired intangible assets, acquisition-related professional fees and retention bonuses, change in fair value of contingent consideration, foreign exchange (gain) loss, and the income tax effect on non-GAAP items. Silvaco is unable to predict with reasonable certainty the ultimate outcome of these exclusions without unreasonable effort. Therefore, Silvaco has not provided guidance for GAAP gross margin, GAAP operating income or GAAP diluted net income (loss) per share or a reconciliation of the forward-looking non-GAAP gross margin or non-GAAP operating income or non-GAAP diluted net income (loss) per share guidance to GAAP gross margin or GAAP operating income or GAAP diluted net income (loss) per share, respectively. However, it is important to note that these excluded items could be material to our results computed in accordance with GAAP in future periods.

    Based on current business trends and conditions, the Company expects for second quarter 2025 the following:

    • Gross bookings in the range of $14.0 million to $18.0 million, which would compare to $19.5 million in the second quarter of 2024.
    • Revenue in the range of $12.0 million to $16.0 million, which would compare to $15.0 million in the second quarter of 2024.
    • Non-GAAP gross margin in the range of 80% to 83%, which would compare to 86% in the second quarter of 2024.
    • Non-GAAP operating loss in the range of ($4.0) million to ($2.0) million, compared to non-GAAP operating income of $1.7 million in the second quarter of 2024.
    • Non-GAAP diluted net loss per share in the range of ($0.10) to ($0.03), compared to net income per share of $0.07 in the second quarter of 2024.

    Based on current business trends and conditions, the Company expects for full year 2025, the following:

    • Gross bookings in the range of $67.0 million to $74.0 million, which would represent a 2% to 13% increase from $65.8 million in 2024.
    • Revenue in the range of $64.0 million to $70.0 million, which would represent a 7% to 17% increase from $59.7 million in 2024.
    • Non-GAAP gross margin in the range of 83% to 86%, which would compare to 86% in 2024.
    • Non-GAAP operating (loss) income in the range of ($2.0) million loss to $1.0 million income, which would compare to $5.5 million income in 2024.
    • Non-GAAP diluted net (loss) income per share in the range of ($0.07) net loss per share to $0.03 net income per share, compared to $0.25 net income per share in 2024.

    Q1 2025 Conference Call Details

    A press release highlighting the Company’s results along with supplemental financial results will be available at https://investors.silvaco.com/ along with an earnings presentation to accompany management’s prepared remarks. An archived replay of the conference call will be available on this website for a limited time after the call. Participants who want to join the call and ask a question may register for the call here to receive the dial-in numbers and unique PIN.

    Date: Wednesday, May 7, 2025
    Time: 5:00 p.m. Eastern time
    Webcast: Here (live and replay)

    About Silvaco

    Silvaco is a provider of TCAD, EDA software, and SIP solutions that enable semiconductor design and digital twin modeling through AI software and innovation. Silvaco’s solutions are used for semiconductor and photonics processes, devices, and systems development across display, power devices, automotive, memory, high performance compute, foundries, photonics, internet of things, and 5G/6G mobile markets for complex SoC design. Silvaco is headquartered in Santa Clara, California, and has a global presence with offices located in North America, Europe, Brazil, China, Japan, Korea, Singapore, and Taiwan.

    Safe Harbor Statement

    This press release contains forward-looking statements based on Silvaco’s current expectations. The words “believe”, “estimate”, “expect”, “intend”, “anticipate”, “plan”, “project”, “will”, and similar phrases as they relate to Silvaco are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements reflect the current views and assumptions of Silvaco and are subject to various risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from expectations.

    These forward-looking statements include but are not limited to, statements regarding our future operating results, financial position, and guidance, our business strategy and plans, our objectives for future operations, our development or delivery of new or enhanced products, and anticipated results of those products for our customers, our competitive positioning, projected costs, technological capabilities, and plans, and macroeconomic trends.

    A variety of risks and factors that are beyond our control could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements including, without limitation, the following: (a) market conditions; (b) anticipated trends, challenges and growth in our business and the markets in which we operate; (c) our ability to appropriately respond to changing technologies on a timely and cost-effective basis; (d) the size and growth potential of the markets for our software solutions, and our ability to serve those markets; (e) our expectations regarding competition in our existing and new markets; (f) the level of demand in our customers’ end markets; (g) regulatory developments in the United States and foreign countries; (h) changes in trade policies, including the imposition of tariffs; (i) proposed new software solutions, services or developments; (j) our ability to attract and retain key management personnel; (k) our customer relationships and our ability to retain and expand our customer relationships; (l) our ability to diversify our customer base and develop relationships in new markets; (m) the strategies, prospects, plans, expectations, and objectives of management for future operations; (n) public health crises, pandemics, and epidemics and their effects on our business and our customers’ businesses; (o) the impact of the current conflicts between Ukraine and Russia and Israel and Hamas and the ongoing trade disputes among the United States and China on our business, financial condition or prospects, including extreme volatility in the global capital markets making debt or equity financing more difficult to obtain, more costly or more dilutive, delays and disruptions of the global supply chains and the business activities of our suppliers, distributors, customers and other business partners; (p) changes in general economic or business conditions or economic or demographic trends in the United States and foreign countries including changes in tariffs, interest rates and inflation; (q) our ability to raise additional capital; (r) our ability to accurately forecast demand for our software solutions; (s) our expectations regarding the outcome of any ongoing litigation; (t) our ability to successfully integrate recent acquisitions; (u) our expectations regarding the period during which we qualify as an emerging growth company under the JOBS Act and as a smaller reporting company under the Exchange Act; (v) our expectations regarding our ability to obtain, maintain, protect and enforce intellectual property protection for our technology; (w) our status as a controlled company; and (x) our use of the net proceeds from our initial public offering.

    It is not possible for us to predict all risks, nor can we assess the impact of all factors on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results or outcomes to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements we may make. Accordingly, you should not rely on any of the forward-looking statements. Additional information relating to the uncertainty affecting Silvaco’s business is contained in Silvaco’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These documents are available on the SEC Filings section of the Investor Relations section of Silvaco’s website at http://investors.silvaco.com/. These forward-looking statements represent Silvaco’s expectations as of the date of this press release. Subsequent events may cause these expectations to change, and Silvaco disclaims any obligation to update or alter these forward-looking statements in the future, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

    Discussion of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Key Business Metrics

    We use certain non-GAAP financial measures to supplement the performance measures in our consolidated financial statements, which are presented in accordance with GAAP. These non-GAAP financial measures include non-GAAP gross profit, non-GAAP gross margin, non-GAAP operating income (loss), non-GAAP net income (loss), and non-GAAP diluted net income (loss) per share. We use these non-GAAP financial measures for financial and operational decision-making and as a means to assist us in evaluating period-to-period comparisons.

    We define non-GAAP gross profit and non-GAAP gross margin as our GAAP gross profit and GAAP gross margin adjusted to exclude certain costs, including stock-based compensation expense, amortization of acquired intangible assets and acquisition-related professional fees and retention bonuses. We define non-GAAP operating income (loss), as our GAAP operating income (loss) adjusted to exclude certain costs, including IPO preparation costs, acquisition-related estimated litigation claim and legal costs, stock-based compensation expense, amortization of acquired intangible assets, and acquisition-related professional fees and retention bonuses. We define non-GAAP net income (loss) as our GAAP net income (loss) adjusted to exclude certain costs, including IPO preparation costs, acquisition-related estimated litigation claim and legal costs, stock-based compensation expense, amortization of acquired intangible assets, acquisition-related professional fees and retention bonuses, change in fair value of contingent consideration, foreign exchange (gain) loss, and the income tax effect on non-GAAP items. Our non-GAAP diluted net income (loss) per share is calculated in the same way as our non-GAAP net income (loss), but on a per share basis. We monitor non-GAAP gross profit, non-GAAP gross margin, non-GAAP operating income (loss), non-GAAP net income (loss) and non-GAAP diluted net income (loss) per share as non-GAAP financial measures to supplement the financial information we present in accordance with GAAP to provide investors with additional information regarding our financial results.

    Certain items are excluded from our non-GAAP gross profit, non-GAAP gross margin, non-GAAP operating income (loss), non-GAAP net income (loss) and non-GAAP diluted net income (loss) per share because these items are non-cash in nature or are not indicative of our core operating performance and render comparisons with prior periods and competitors less meaningful. We adjust GAAP gross profit, GAAP gross margin, GAAP operating income (loss), GAAP net income (loss), and GAAP diluted net income (loss) per share for these items to arrive at non-GAAP gross profit, non-GAAP gross margin, non-GAAP operating income (loss), non-GAAP net income (loss), and non-GAAP diluted net income (loss) per share because these amounts can vary substantially from company to company within our industry depending upon accounting methods and book values of assets, capital structure and the method by which the assets were acquired. By excluding certain items that may not be indicative of our recurring core operating results, we believe that non-GAAP gross profit, non-GAAP gross margin, non-GAAP operating income (loss), non-GAAP net income (loss) and non-GAAP diluted net income (loss) per share provide meaningful supplemental information regarding our performance.

    We believe these non-GAAP financial measures are useful to investors and others because they allow for additional information with respect to financial measures used by management in its financial and operational decision-making and they may be used by our institutional investors and the analyst community to help them analyze our financial performance and the health of our business. However, there are a number of limitations related to the use of non-GAAP financial measures, and these non-GAAP measures should be considered in addition to, not as a substitute for or in isolation from, our financial results prepared in accordance with GAAP. Other companies, including companies in our industry, may calculate these non-GAAP financial measures differently or not at all, which reduces their usefulness as comparative measures.

    Annual Contract Value (“ACV”) is a key performance metric for Silvaco and is useful to investors in assessing the strength and trajectory of the business. ACV is a supplemental metric to help evaluate the annual performance of the business. Over the life of the contract, ACV equals the total value realized from a customer. ACV is not impacted by the timing of license revenue recognition. ACV is used by management in financial and operational decision-making. ACV is not a replacement for, and should be viewed independently of, GAAP revenue and deferred revenue, as ACV is a performance metric and is not intended to be combined with any of these items. There is no GAAP measure comparable to ACV.

    ACV is composed of the following: (i) the annualized value of term based software licenses with start dates or anniversary dates during the period, plus; (ii) the value of perpetual license contracts with start dates during the period, plus; (iii) the annualized value of maintenance & support as well as any fixed-term services contracts with start dates or anniversary dates during the period, plus; (iv) the value of fixed-deliverable services contracts. Silvaco and the Silvaco logo are registered trademarks of Silvaco Group, Inc. All other trademarks and service marks are the property of their respective owners.

    SILVACO GROUP, INC.
    CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
    (Unaudited, in thousands except share and par value amounts)
           
      March 31, 2025   December 31, 2024
    ASSETS      
    Current assets:      
    Cash and cash equivalents $ 29,489     $ 19,606  
    Current marketable securities   45,048       63,071  
    Accounts receivable, net   5,783       9,211  
    Contract assets, net   15,102       11,932  
    Prepaid expenses and other current assets   4,500       3,460  
    Total current assets   99,922       107,280  
    Non-current assets:      
    Non-current marketable securities   —       4,785  
    Property and equipment, net   890       865  
    Operating lease right-of-use assets, net   1,534       1,711  
    Intangible assets, net   9,997       4,369  
    Goodwill   14,337       9,026  
    Non-current portion of contract assets   9,860       12,611  
    Other assets   1,595       1,698  
    Total non-current assets   38,213       35,065  
    Total assets $ 138,135     $ 142,345  
    LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY      
    Current liabilities:      
    Accounts payable $ 2,137     $ 3,316  
    Accrued expenses and other current liabilities   32,426       19,801  
    Accrued income taxes   1,728       1,668  
    Deferred revenue, current   8,618       7,497  
    Operating lease liabilities, current   644       744  
    Vendor financing obligation, current   1,191       1,462  
    Total current liabilities   46,744       34,488  
    Non-current liabilities:      
    Deferred revenue, non-current   3,604       3,593  
    Operating lease liabilities, non-current   866       946  
    Vendor financing obligation, non-current   2,995       2,928  
    Other non-current liabilities   333       307  
    Total liabilities   54,542       42,262  
    Stockholders’ equity:      
    Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024 , respectively   —       —  
    Common stock, $0.0001 par value; 500,000,000 shares authorized; 28,805,280 and 28,526,615 shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, respectively   3       3  
    Additional paid-in capital   132,937       130,360  
    Accumulated deficit   (47,285 )     (28,012 )
    Accumulated other comprehensive loss   (2,062 )     (2,268 )
    Total stockholders’ equity   83,593       100,083  
    Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $ 138,135     $ 142,345  
           
           
    SILVACO GROUP, INC.
    CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF (LOSS) INCOME
    (Unaudited, in thousands except share and par value amounts)
           
      Three Months Ended March 31,
        2025       2024  
    Revenue:      
    Software license revenue $ 10,009     $ 12,258  
    Maintenance and service   4,083       3,631  
    Total revenue   14,092       15,889  
    Cost of revenue   3,016       1,973  
    Gross profit   11,076       13,916  
    Operating expenses:      
    Research and development   4,800       3,616  
    Selling and marketing   4,719       3,312  
    General and administrative   8,120       4,600  
    Estimated litigation claim   13,069       —  
    Total operating expenses   30,708       11,528  
    Operating (loss) income   (19,632 )     2,388  
    Interest income   863       —  
    Interest and other expense, net   (291 )     (205 )
    (Loss) income before income tax provision   (19,060 )     2,183  
    Income tax provision   213       805  
    Net (loss) income $ (19,273 )   $ 1,378  
    Net (loss) income per share:      
    Basic and diluted $ (0.67 )   $ 0.07  
    Weighted average shares used in computing per share amounts:      
    Basic and diluted   28,694,295       20,000,000  
           
           
    SILVACO GROUP, INC.
    CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
    (Unaudited, in thousands)
           
      Three Months Ended March 31,
        2025       2024  
    Cash flows from operating activities:      
    Net (loss) income $ (19,273 )   $ 1,378  
    Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:      
    Depreciation and amortization   438       120  
    Stock-based compensation expense   2,277       —  
    Provision for credit losses   10       222  
    Estimated litigation claim   13,069       —  
    Accretion of discount on marketable securities, net   (261 )     —  
    Change in fair value of contingent consideration   35       (8 )
    Changes in operating assets and liabilities:      
    Accounts receivable   3,520       (1,844 )
    Contract assets   440       (3,679 )
    Prepaid expenses and other current assets   (1,026 )     788  
    Other assets   119       (274 )
    Accounts payable   (1,183 )     877  
    Accrued expenses and other current liabilities   55       (729 )
    Accrued income taxes   58       574  
    Deferred revenue   567       (21 )
    Other non-current liabilities   20       24  
    Net cash used in operating activities   (1,135 )     (2,572 )
    Cash flows from investing activities:      
    Maturities of marketable securities   23,000       —  
    Acquisition of Process Proximity Compensation   (11,500 )     —  
    Purchases of property and equipment   (96 )     (10 )
    Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities   11,404       (10 )
    Cash flows from financing activities:      
    Proceeds from loan facility   —       4,250  
    Deferred transaction costs   —       (364 )
    Payroll taxes related to shares withheld from employees   (252 )     —  
    Contingent consideration   (46 )     (13 )
    Payments of vendor financing obligation   (205 )     —  
    Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities   (503 )     3,873  
    Effect of exchange rate fluctuations on cash and cash equivalents   117       27  
    Net increase in cash and cash equivalents   9,883       1,318  
    Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period   19,606       4,421  
    Cash and cash equivalents, end of period $ 29,489     $ 5,739  
           
    SILVACO GROUP, INC.
    REVENUE
    (Unaudited)
        2024   2025
        Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Year   Q1
    Revenue by Region:                
    Americas   27 % 51 % 31 % 40 % 38 %   20 %
    APAC   62 % 41 % 58 % 52 % 53 %   66 %
    EMEA   11 % 8 % 11 % 8 % 9 %   14 %
    Total revenue   100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 %   100 %
                     
    Revenue by Product Line:                
    TCAD   66 % 69 % 59 % 71 % 68 %   56 %
    EDA   30 % 20 % 24 % 24 % 24 %   36 %
    SIP   4 % 11 % 17 % 5 % 8 %   8 %
    Total revenue   100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 %   100 %
                     
    Revenue Item Category:                
    Software license revenue   77 % 74 % 62 % 78 % 74 %   71 %
    Maintenance and service   23 % 26 % 38 % 22 % 26 %   29 %
    Total revenue   100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 %   100 %
                     
    Revenue by Country:                
    United States   26 % 50 % 30 % 39 % 37 %   20 %
    China   11 % 17 % 25 % 23 % 18 %   14 %
    Other   63 % 33 % 45 % 38 % 45 %   66 %
    Total revenue   100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 %   100 %
                     
    SILVACO GROUP, INC.
    GAAP to Non-GAAP Reconciliation
    (Unaudited, in thousands except per share amounts)
     
      Three Months Ended
      3/31/2025   3/31/2024
           
    GAAP Cost of revenue $ 3,016     $ 1,973  
    Less: Stock-based compensation expense   (199 )     —  
    Less: Amortization of acquired intangible assets   (249 )     —  
    Less: Acquisition-related professional fees and retention bonus   (8 )     —  
    Non-GAAP Cost of revenue $ 2,560     $ 1,973  
    GAAP Gross profit $ 11,076     $ 13,916  
    Add: Stock-based compensation expense   199       —  
    Add: Amortization of acquired intangible assets   249       —  
    Add: Acquisition-related professional fees and retention bonus   8       —  
    Non-GAAP Gross profit $ 11,532     $ 13,916  
    GAAP Research and development $ 4,800     $ 3,616  
    Less: Stock-based compensation expense   (244 )     —  
    Less: Acquisition-related professional fees and retention bonus   (18 )     —  
    Less: Amortization of acquired intangible assets   (51 )     (70 ) 
    Non-GAAP Research and development $ 4,487     $ 3,546  
    GAAP Selling and marketing $ 4,719     $ 3,312  
    Less: Stock-based compensation expense   (323 )      —  
    Less: IPO preparation costs   —       -127  
    Non-GAAP Selling and marketing $ 4,396     $ 3,185  
    GAAP General and administrative $ 8,120     $ 4,600  
    Less: Stock-based compensation expense   (1,511 )     —  
    Less: Acquisition-related estimated litigation claim and legal costs   (726 )     (594 )
    Less: Acquisition-related professional fees and retention bonus   (677 )     —  
    Less: Amortization of acquired intangible assets   (62 )     —  
    Less: IPO preparation costs   —       (139 )
    Non-GAAP General and administrative $ 5,144     $ 3,867  
    GAAP Estimated litigation claim $ 13,069     $ —  
    Less: Acquisition-related estimated litigation claim and legal costs   (13,069 )     —  
    Non-GAAP Estimated litigation claim $ —     $ —  
    GAAP Operating expenses $ 30,708     $ 11,528  
    Less: Stock-based compensation expense   (2,078 )     —  
    Less: Acquisition-related estimated litigation claim and legal costs   (13,795 )     (594 )
    Less: Acquisition-related professional fees and retention bonus   (695 )     —  
    Less: IPO preparation costs   —       (266 )
    Less: Amortization of acquired intangible assets   (113 )     (70 )
    Non-GAAP Operating expenses $ 14,027     $ 10,598  
    GAAP Operating (loss) income $ (19,632 )   $ 2,388  
    Add: Stock-based compensation expense   2,277       —  
    Add: Acquisition-related estimated litigation claim and legal costs   13,795       594  
    Add: Acquisition-related professional fees and retention bonus   703       —  
    Add: IPO preparation costs   —       266  
    Add: Amortization of acquired intangible assets   362       70  
    Non-GAAP Operating (loss) income $ (2,495 )   $ 3,318  
    GAAP Net (loss) income $ (19,273 )   $ 1,378  
    Add: Stock-based compensation expense   2,277       —  
    Add: Acquisition-related estimated litigation claim and legal costs   13,795       594  
    Add: Acquisition-related professional fees and retention bonus   703       —  
    Add: IPO preparation costs   —       266  
    Add: Amortization of acquired intangible assets   362       70  
    Add (Less): Change in fair value of contingent consideration   35       (8 )
    Add (Less): Foreign exchange (gain) loss   205       130  
    Add (Less): Income tax effect of non-GAAP adjustment   (5 )     (33 )
    Non-GAAP Net (loss) income $ (1,901 )   $ 2,397  
    GAAP Net income (loss) per share:      
    Basic and diluted: $ (0.67 )   $ 0.07  
    Non-GAAP Net income (loss) per share:      
    Basic and diluted $ (0.07 )   $ 0.12  
    Weighted average shares used in GAAP and non-GAAP net income (loss) per share:      
    Basic and diluted   28,694,295       20,000,000  
           

    Investor Contact:
    Greg McNiff
    investors@silvaco.com 

    Media Contact:
    Farhad Hayat
    press@silvaco.com

    The MIL Network –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: Fortinet Reports First Quarter 2025 Financial Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Highlights

    • Total revenue of $1.54 billion, up 14% year over year
    • Product revenue of $459 million, up 12% year over year
    • Billings of $1.60 billion, up 14% year over year1
    • Unified SASE ARR2up 26% and Security Operations ARR2up 30%, year over year
    • Record first quarter GAAP operating margin of 29%
    • Record first quarter Non-GAAP operating margin of 34%1
    • Record Cash flow from operations of $863 million
    • Record Free cash flow of $783 million1

    SUNNYVALE, Calif., May 07, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Fortinet® (Nasdaq: FTNT), a global cybersecurity leader driving the convergence of networking and security, today announced financial results for the first quarter ended March 31, 2025.

    “We are pleased to report another strong quarter as non-GAAP operating margin increased 570 basis points year over year to a first quarter record of 34%, while billings grew 14% year over year,” said Ken Xie, Founder, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Fortinet. “We continue to accelerate our growth strategy by investing in the rapidly expanding Unified SASE and Security Operations markets, while strengthening our leadership in Secure Networking. Leveraging our deep expertise in networking and security convergence, a strong track record of AI-driven innovation, and seamless product development and integration through our FortiOS operating system, we have established ourselves as the leader in organic innovation and will continue setting the industry standard in cybersecurity.”

    Financial Highlights for the First Quarter of 2025

    • Revenue: Total revenue was $1.54 billion for the first quarter of 2025, an increase of 13.8% compared to $1.35 billion for the same quarter of 2024.
    • Product Revenue: Product revenue was $459.1 million for the first quarter of 2025, an increase of 12.3% compared to $408.9 million for the same quarter of 2024.
    • Service Revenue: Service revenue was $1.08 billion for the first quarter of 2025, an increase of 14.4% compared to $944.4 million for the same quarter of 2024.
    • Billings1: Total billings were $1.60 billion for the first quarter of 2025, an increase of 13.5% compared to $1.41 billion for the same quarter of 2024.
    • Remaining performance obligations: Remaining performance obligations were $6.49 billion as of March 31, 2025, an increase of 11.7% compared to $5.81 billion as of March 31, 2024. We expect to recognize approximately $3.38 billion as revenue over the next 12 months, an increase of 15.4% compared to $2.93 billion as of March 31, 2024.
    • Unified SASE ARR2: Unified SASE ARR was $1.15 billion as of March 31, 2025, an increase of 25.7% compared to $914.7 million as of March 31, 2024.
    • Security Operations ARR2: Security Operations ARR was $434.5 million as of March 31, 2025, an increase of 30.3% compared to $333.5 million as of March 31, 2024.
    • GAAP Operating Income and Margin: GAAP operating income was $453.8 million for the first quarter of 2025, representing a GAAP operating margin of 29.5%. GAAP operating income was $321.2 million for the same quarter of 2024, representing a GAAP operating margin of 23.7%.
    • Non-GAAP Operating Income and Margin1: Non-GAAP operating income was $526.2 million for the first quarter of 2025, representing a non-GAAP operating margin of 34.2%. Non-GAAP operating income was $386.1 million for the same quarter of 2024, representing a non-GAAP operating margin of 28.5%.
    • GAAP Net Income and Diluted Net Income Per Share: GAAP net income was $433.4 million for the first quarter of 2025, compared to GAAP net income of $299.3 million for the same quarter of 2024. GAAP diluted net income per share was $0.56 for the first quarter of 2025, based on 776.8 million diluted weighted-average shares outstanding, compared to GAAP diluted net income per share of $0.39 for the same quarter of 2024, based on 770.5 million diluted weighted-average shares outstanding.
    • Non-GAAP Net Income and Diluted Net Income Per Share1: Non-GAAP net income was $452.3 million for the first quarter of 2025, compared to non-GAAP net income of $333.9 million for the same quarter of 2024. Non-GAAP diluted net income per share was $0.58 for the first quarter of 2025, based on 776.8 million diluted weighted-average shares outstanding, compared to $0.43 for the same quarter of 2024, based on 770.5 million diluted weighted-average shares outstanding.
    • Cash Flow: Cash flow from operations was $863.3 million for the first quarter of 2025, compared to $830.4 million for the same quarter of 2024. Cash flow from operations for the first quarter of 2025 includes $14.0 million proceeds from an intellectual property matter.
    • Free Cash Flow1: Free cash flow was $782.8 million for the first quarter of 2025, compared to $608.5 million for the same quarter of 2024.

    Guidance

    For the second quarter of 2025, Fortinet currently expects:

    • Revenue in the range of $1.590 billion to $1.650 billion
    • Billings in the range of $1.685 billion to $1.765 billion
    • Non-GAAP gross margin in the range of 80.0% to 81.0%
    • Non-GAAP operating margin in the range of 31.5% to 32.5%
    • Diluted non-GAAP net income per share in the range of $0.58 to $0.60, assuming a non-GAAP effective tax rate of 18%. This assumes a diluted share count of 773 million to 777 million.

    For the fiscal year 2025, Fortinet currently expects:

    • Revenue in the range of $6.650 billion to $6.850 billion
    • Service revenue in the range of $4.575 billion to $4.725 billion
    • Billings in the range of $7.200 billion to $7.400 billion
    • Non-GAAP gross margin in the range of 79.0% to 81.0%
    • Non-GAAP operating margin in the range of 31.5% to 33.5%
    • Diluted non-GAAP net income per share in the range of $2.43 to $2.49, assuming a non-GAAP effective tax rate of 18%. This assumes a diluted share count of 769 million to 779 million.

    These statements are forward looking and actual results may differ materially. Refer to the Forward-Looking Statements section below for information on the factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from these forward-looking statements.

    Our guidance with respect to non-GAAP financial measures excludes stock-based compensation, amortization of acquired intangible assets, gain on intellectual property matters, gain on bargain purchase related to acquisition, gain from an equity method investment and a tax adjustment required for an effective tax rate on a non-GAAP basis, which differs from the GAAP effective tax rate. We have not reconciled our guidance with respect to non-GAAP financial measures to the corresponding GAAP measures because certain items that impact these measures are uncertain or out of our control, or cannot be reasonably predicted. Accordingly, a reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures to the corresponding GAAP measures is not available without unreasonable effort.

    1 A reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP measures has been provided in the financial statement tables included in this press release. An explanation of these measures is also included below under the heading “Non-GAAP Financial Measures”.
    2 Annual Recurring Revenue or ARR is defined as the annualized value of renewable / recurring customer agreements as of the measurement date, assuming any contract that expires during the next 12 months is renewed at its existing value.

    Conference Call Details

    Fortinet will host a conference call today at 1:30 p.m. Pacific Time (4:30 p.m. Eastern Time) to discuss the earnings results. A live webcast of the conference call and supplemental slides will be accessible from the Investor Relations page of Fortinet’s website at https://investor.fortinet.com and a replay will be archived and accessible at https://investor.fortinet.com/events-and-presentations.

    Second Quarter 2025 Conference Participation Schedule:

    • J.P. Morgan Global Technology, Media and Communications Conference
      May 13, 2025
    • Bank of America Global Technology Conference
      June 3, 2025

    Members of Fortinet’s management team are expected to present at these conferences and discuss the latest company strategies and initiatives. Fortinet’s conference presentations are expected to be available via webcast on the company’s website. To access the most updated information, pre-register and listen to the webcast of each event, please visit the Investor Presentation & Events page of Fortinet’s website at https://investor.fortinet.com/events-and-presentations. The schedule is subject to change.

    About Fortinet (www.fortinet.com)

    Fortinet (Nasdaq: FTNT) is a driving force in the evolution of cybersecurity and the convergence of networking and security. Our mission is to secure people, devices and data everywhere, and today we deliver cybersecurity everywhere our customers need it with the largest integrated portfolio of over 50 enterprise-grade products. Well over half a million customers trust Fortinet’s solutions, which are among the most deployed, most patented and most validated in the industry. The Fortinet Training Institute, one of the largest and broadest training programs in the industry, is dedicated to making cybersecurity training and new career opportunities available to everyone. Collaboration with esteemed organizations from both the public and private sectors, including Computer Emergency Response Teams (“CERTs”), government entities, and academia, is a fundamental aspect of Fortinet’s commitment to enhance cyber resilience globally. FortiGuard Labs, Fortinet’s elite threat intelligence and research organization, develops and utilizes leading-edge machine learning and AI technologies to provide customers with timely and consistently top-rated protection and actionable threat intelligence. Learn more at https://www.fortinet.com, the Fortinet Blog or FortiGuard Labs.

    Copyright © 2025 Fortinet, Inc. All rights reserved. The symbols ® and ™ denote respectively federally registered trademarks and common law trademarks of Fortinet, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliates. Fortinet’s trademarks include, but are not limited to, the following: Fortinet, the Fortinet logo, FortiGate, FortiOS, FortiGuard, FortiCare, FortiAnalyzer, FortiManager, FortiASIC, FortiClient, FortiCloud, FortiCore, FortiMail, FortiSandbox, FortiADC, FortiAgent, FortiAI, FortiAIOps, FortiAntenna, FortiAP, FortiAPCam, FortiAppSec, FortiAuthenticator, FortiBranchSASE, FortiCache, FortiCall, FortiCam, FortiCamera, FortiCarrier, FortiCART, FortiCASB, FortiCentral, FortiCNP, FortiConnect, FortiController, FortiConverter, FortiCSPM, FortiCWP, FortiDAST, FortiDATA, FortiDB, FortiDDoS, FortiDeceptor, FortiDeploy, FortiDevice, FortiDevSec, FortiDLP, FortiEdge, FortiEDR, FortiEndpoint, FortiExplorer, FortiExtender, FortiFirewall, FortiFlex, FortiFone, FortiGSLB, FortiGuest, FortiHypervisor, FortiInsight, FortiIsolator, FortiLAN, FortiLink, FortiMonitor, FortiNAC, FortiNDR, FortiPAM, FortiPenTest, FortiPhish, FortiPoint, FortiPoints, FortiPolicy, FortiPortal, FortiPresence, FortiProxy, FortiRecon, FortiRecorder, FortiSASE, FortiScanner, FortiSDNConnector, FortiSEC, FortiSIEM, FortiSMS, FortiSOAR, FortiSRA, FortiSwitch, FortiTelemetry, FortiTester, FortiTIP, FortiToken, FortiTrust, FortiVoice, FortiWAN, FortiWeb, FortiWiFi, FortiWLC, FortiWLM, FortiXDR, Lacework FortiCNAPP, Linksys, Intelligent Mesh, Velop, Max-Stream, Performance Perfected and SECURITY FABRIC. Other trademarks belong to their respective owners. Fortinet has not independently verified statements or certifications herein attributed to third parties and Fortinet does not independently endorse such statements. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, nothing herein constitutes a warranty, guarantee, contract, binding specification or other binding commitment by Fortinet or any indication of intent related to a binding commitment, and performance and other specification information herein may be unique to certain environments.

    FTNT-F

    Forward-Looking Statements

    This press release contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. These forward-looking statements include statements regarding any indications related to future growth and market share gains, our strategy going forward, and guidance and expectations around future financial results, including guidance and expectations for the second quarter and full year 2025, and any statements regarding our market opportunity and market size, and business momentum. Although we attempt to be accurate in making forward-looking statements, it is possible that future circumstances might differ from the assumptions on which such statements are based such that actual results are materially different from our forward-looking statements in this release. Important factors that could cause results to differ materially from the statements herein include the following: general economic risks, including those caused by economic challenges, a possible economic downturn or recession and the effects of inflation or stagflation, rising interest rates or reduced information technology spending; supply chain challenges; negative impacts from the ongoing war in Ukraine and its related macroeconomic effects and our decision to reduce operations in Russia; competitiveness in the security market; the dynamic nature of the security market and its products and services; specific economic risks worldwide and in different geographies, and among different customer segments; uncertainty regarding demand and increased business and renewals from existing customers; sales execution risks, including risks in connection with the timing and completion of large strategic deals; uncertainties around continued success in sales growth and market share gains; uncertainties in market opportunities and the market size; actual or perceived vulnerabilities in our supply chain, products or services, and any actual or perceived breach of our network or our customers’ networks; longer sales cycles, particularly for larger enterprise, service providers, government and other large organization customers; the effectiveness of our salesforce and failure to convert sales pipeline into final sales; risks associated with successful implementation of multiple integrated software products and other product functionality risks; risks associated with integrating acquisitions and changes in circumstances and plans associated therewith, including, among other risks, changes in plans related to product and services integrations, product and services plans and sales strategies; sales and marketing execution risks; execution risks around new product development and introductions and innovation; litigation and disputes and the potential cost, distraction and damage to sales and reputation caused thereby or by other factors; cybersecurity threats, breaches and other disruptions; market acceptance of new products and services; the ability to attract and retain personnel; changes in strategy; risks associated with management of growth; lengthy sales and implementation cycles, particularly in larger organizations; technological changes that make our products and services less competitive, including advances in artificial intelligence; risks associated with the adoption of, and demand for, our products and services in general and by specific customer segments, including those caused by competition and pricing pressure; excess product inventory for any reason, including those caused by the effects of increased inflation and interest rates in certain geographies and the war in Ukraine; risks associated with business disruption caused by natural disasters and health emergencies such as earthquakes, fires, power outages, typhoons, floods, health epidemics and viruses, and by manmade events such as civil unrest, labor disruption, international trade disputes, international conflicts such as the war in Ukraine or tensions between China and Taiwan, terrorism, wars, and critical infrastructure attacks; tariffs, trade disputes and other trade barriers, and negative impact on sales based on geo-political dynamics and disputes and protectionist policies, including the impact of any future shutdowns of the U.S. government; and the other risk factors set forth from time to time in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K, our most recent Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), copies of which are available free of charge at the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov or upon request from our investor relations department. All forward-looking statements herein reflect our opinions only as of the date of this release, and we undertake no obligation, and expressly disclaim any obligation, to update forward-looking statements herein in light of new information or future events.

    Non-GAAP Financial Measures

    We have provided in this release financial information that has not been prepared in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”). These non-GAAP financial and liquidity measures are not based on any standardized methodology prescribed by GAAP and are not necessarily comparable to similar measures presented by other companies. We use these non-GAAP financial measures internally in analyzing our financial results and believe they are useful to investors, as a supplement to GAAP measures, in evaluating our ongoing operational performance. We believe that the use of these non-GAAP financial measures provides an additional tool for investors to use in evaluating ongoing operating results and trends and in comparing our financial results with peer companies, many of which present similar non-GAAP financial measures to investors.

    Non-GAAP financial measures should not be considered in isolation from, or as a substitute for, financial information prepared in accordance with GAAP. Investors are encouraged to review the reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures to their most directly comparable GAAP financial measures provided in the financial statement tables below.

    Billings (non-GAAP). We define billings as revenue recognized in accordance with GAAP plus the change in deferred revenue from the beginning to the end of the period less any deferred revenue balances acquired from business combination(s) during the period. We consider billings to be a useful metric for management and investors because billings drive current and future revenue, which is an important indicator of the health and viability of our business and cash flows. There are a number of limitations related to the use of billings instead of GAAP revenue. First, billings include amounts that have not yet been recognized as revenue and are impacted by the term of security and support agreements. Second, we may calculate billings in a manner that is different from peer companies that report similar financial measures. Management accounts for these limitations by providing specific information regarding GAAP revenue and evaluating billings together with GAAP revenue.

    Free cash flow (non-GAAP). We define free cash flow as net cash provided by operating activities minus purchases of property and equipment and excluding any significant non-recurring items, such as proceeds from intellectual property matters. We believe free cash flow to be a liquidity measure that provides useful information to management and investors about the amount of cash generated by the business that, after capital expenditures and net of proceeds from intellectual property matters, can be used for strategic opportunities, including repurchasing outstanding common stock, investing in our business, making strategic acquisitions and strengthening the balance sheet. A limitation of using free cash flow rather than the GAAP measures of cash provided by or used in operating activities, investing activities, and financing activities is that free cash flow does not represent the total increase or decrease in the cash and cash equivalents balance for the period because it excludes cash flows from significant non-recurring items, such as proceeds from intellectual property matters, investing activities other than capital expenditures and cash flows from financing activities. Management accounts for this limitation by providing information about our proceeds from intellectual property matters, our capital expenditures and other investing and financing activities on the face of the cash flow statement and under the caption “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources” in our most recent Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and Annual Report on Form 10-K and by presenting cash flows from investing and financing activities in our reconciliation of free cash flow. In addition, it is important to note that other companies, including companies in our industry, may not use free cash flow, may calculate free cash flow in a different manner than we do or may use other financial measures to evaluate their performance, all of which could reduce the usefulness of free cash flow as a comparative measure.

    Non-GAAP operating income and operating margin. We define non-GAAP operating income as operating income plus stock-based compensation, amortization of acquired intangible assets, less gain on intellectual property matters and, when applicable, other significant non-recurring items in a given quarter. Non-GAAP operating margin is defined as non-GAAP operating income divided by GAAP revenue. We consider these non-GAAP financial measures to be useful metrics for management and investors because they exclude the items noted above so that our management and investors can compare our recurring core business operating results over multiple periods. There are a number of limitations related to the use of non-GAAP operating income instead of operating income calculated in accordance with GAAP. First, non-GAAP operating income excludes the items noted above. Second, the components of the costs that we exclude from our calculation of non-GAAP operating income may differ from the components that peer companies exclude when they report their non-GAAP results of operations. Management accounts for these limitations by providing specific information regarding the GAAP amounts excluded from non-GAAP operating income and evaluating non-GAAP operating income together with operating income calculated in accordance with GAAP.

    Non-GAAP net income and diluted net income per share. We define non-GAAP net income as net income plus the items noted above under non-GAAP operating income and operating margin. In addition, we adjust non-GAAP net income and diluted net income per share for a gain on bargain purchase related to acquisition, a gain from an equity method investment related to acquisition and a tax adjustment required for an effective tax rate on a non-GAAP basis, which differs from the GAAP effective tax rate. We define non-GAAP diluted net income per share as non-GAAP net income divided by the non-GAAP diluted weighted-average shares outstanding. We consider these non-GAAP financial measures to be useful metrics for management and investors for the same reasons that we use non-GAAP operating income and non-GAAP operating margin. However, in order to provide a more complete picture of our recurring core business operating results, we include in non-GAAP net income and non-GAAP diluted net income per share, the tax adjustment required resulting in an effective tax rate on a non-GAAP basis, which often differs from the GAAP tax rate. We believe the non-GAAP effective tax rates we use are reasonable estimates of normalized tax rates for our current and prior fiscal years under our global operating structure. The same limitations described above regarding our use of non-GAAP operating income and non-GAAP operating margin apply to our use of non-GAAP net income and non-GAAP diluted net income per share. We account for these limitations by providing specific information regarding the GAAP amounts excluded from non-GAAP net income and non-GAAP diluted net income per share and evaluating non-GAAP net income and non-GAAP diluted net income per share together with net income and diluted net income per share calculated in accordance with GAAP.

    FORTINET, INC.
    CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
    (Unaudited, in millions)
     
      March 31,
    2025
      December 31,
    2024
     
    ASSETS                
    CURRENT ASSETS:                
    Cash and cash equivalents $ 3,596.6     $ 2,875.9    
    Short-term investments   1,183.9       1,190.6    
    Accounts receivable—net   1,174.0       1,463.4    
    Inventory   362.7       315.5    
    Prepaid expenses and other current assets   125.4       126.1    
       Total current assets   6,442.6       5,971.5    
    LONG-TERM INVESTMENTS   35.2       —    
    PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT—NET   1,403.8       1,349.5    
    DEFERRED CONTRACT COSTS   636.2       622.9    
    DEFERRED TAX ASSETS   1,411.6       1,335.6    
    GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS—NET   357.4       350.4    
    OTHER ASSETS   120.2       133.2    
    TOTAL ASSETS $ 10,407.0     $ 9,763.1    
    LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY                
    CURRENT LIABILITIES:                
    Accounts payable $ 224.5     $ 190.9    
    Accrued liabilities   415.0       337.9    
    Accrued payroll and compensation   250.2       255.7    
    Current portion of long-term debt   498.7       —    
    Deferred revenue   3,339.4       3,276.2    
       Total current liabilities   4,727.8       4,060.7    
    DEFERRED REVENUE   3,079.0       3,084.7    
    LONG-TERM DEBT   496.2       994.3    
    OTHER LIABILITIES   141.1       129.6    
       Total liabilities   8,444.1       8,269.3    
    COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES                
    STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY:                
    Common stock   0.8       0.8    
    Additional paid-in capital   1,668.7       1,636.2    
    Accumulated other comprehensive loss   (22.9 )     (26.1 )  
    Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)   316.3       (117.1 )  
                Total stockholders’ equity   1,962.9       1,493.8    
    TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY $ 10,407.0     $ 9,763.1    
     
    FORTINET, INC.
    CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
    (Unaudited, in millions, except per share amounts)
     
      Three Months Ended
     
      March 31,
    2025
      March 31,
    2024
     
    REVENUE:                
    Product $ 459.1     $ 408.9    
    Service   1,080.6       944.4    
          Total revenue   1,539.7       1,353.3    
    COST OF REVENUE:                
    Product   149.9       182.8    
    Service   143.2       121.9    
          Total cost of revenue   293.1       304.7    
    GROSS PROFIT:                
    Product   309.2       226.1    
    Service   937.4       822.5    
          Total gross profit   1,246.6       1,048.6    
    OPERATING EXPENSES:                
    Research and development   198.6       173.0    
    Sales and marketing   542.7       501.1    
    General and administrative   57.8       54.4    
    Gain on intellectual property matters   (6.3 )     (1.1 )  
          Total operating expenses   792.8       727.4    
    OPERATING INCOME   453.8       321.2    
    INTEREST INCOME   44.3       32.2    
    INTEREST EXPENSE   (4.9 )     (5.1 )  
    OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)—NET   26.1       (2.9 )  
    INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND GAIN (LOSS) FROM EQUITY METHOD
    INVESTMENTS
      519.3       345.4    
    PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES   96.5       39.5    
    GAIN (LOSS) FROM EQUITY METHOD INVESTMENTS   10.6       (6.6 )  
    NET INCOME $ 433.4     $ 299.3    
    Net income per share:                
    Basic $ 0.56     $ 0.39    
    Diluted $ 0.56     $ 0.39    
    Weighted-average shares outstanding:                
    Basic   768.3       762.4    
    Diluted   776.8       770.5    
     
    FORTINET, INC.
    CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
    (Unaudited, in millions)
     
      Three Months Ended
     
      March 31,
    2025
      March 31,
    2024
     
    CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:                
    Net income $ 433.4     $ 299.3    
    Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:                
             Stock-based compensation   66.1       62.3    
             Amortization of deferred contract costs   78.0       72.0    
             Depreciation and amortization   35.8       28.6    
             Amortization of investment discounts   (10.3 )     (12.2 )  
             Other   (35.5 )     9.9    
             Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of impact of business combinations:                
                      Accounts receivable—net   303.9       405.6    
                      Inventory   (34.1 )     36.5    
                      Prepaid expenses and other current assets   3.4       (0.1 )  
                      Deferred contract costs   (91.3 )     (66.5 )  
                      Deferred tax assets   (30.0 )     (73.9 )  
                      Other assets   1.5       (6.2 )  
                      Accounts payable   24.6       (61.6 )  
                      Accrued liabilities   63.7       105.0    
                      Accrued payroll and compensation   (8.2 )     (27.4 )  
                      Deferred revenue   57.0       54.8    
                      Other liabilities   5.3       4.3    
                             Net cash provided by operating activities   863.3       830.4    
    CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:                
    Purchases of investments   (503.0 )     (436.1 )  
    Sales of investments   2.8       —    
    Maturities of investments   466.9       393.4    
    Purchases of property and equipment   (66.5 )     (221.9 )  
    Payments made in connection with business combinations, net of cash acquired   (11.2 )     (5.7 )  
    Other   0.2       —    
                             Net cash used in investing activities   (110.8 )     (270.3 )  
    CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:                
    Proceeds from issuance of common stock   20.2       13.4    
    Taxes paid related to net share settlement of equity awards   (52.9 )     (42.9 )  
    Other   —       (0.8 )  
                             Net cash used in financing activities   (32.7 )     (30.3 )  
    EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS   0.9       (1.4 )  
    NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS   720.7       528.4    
    CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS—Beginning of period   2,875.9       1,397.9    
    CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS—End of period $ 3,596.6     $ 1,926.3    
     
    Reconciliations of non-GAAP results of operations measures to the nearest comparable GAAP measures
    (Unaudited, in millions, except per share amounts)
     
    Reconciliation of GAAP operating income to non-GAAP operating income, operating margin, net income and diluted net income per share
     
      Three Months Ended
     
      March 31,
    2025
      March 31,
    2024
     
    Reconciliation of non-GAAP operating income:                
    GAAP operating income $ 453.8     $ 321.2    
    GAAP operating margin   29.5 %     23.7 %  
    Add back:                
        Stock‐based compensation   66.9       63.0    
        Amortization of acquired intangible assets   11.8       3.0    
        Gain on intellectual property matters   (6.3 )     (1.1 )  
    Non‐GAAP operating income $ 526.2     $ 386.1    
    Non‐GAAP operating margin   34.2 %     28.5 %  
                     
    Reconciliation of non-GAAP net income:                
    GAAP net income $ 433.4     $ 299.3    
    Add back:                
        Stock‐based compensation   66.9       63.0    
        Amortization of acquired intangible assets   11.8       3.0    
        Gain on intellectual property matters   (6.3 )     (1.1 )  
        Gain on bargain purchase (a)   (39.9 )     —    
        Tax adjustment (b)   (2.8 )     (30.3 )  
        Gain from equity method investment (c)   (10.8 )     —    
    Non-GAAP net income $ 452.3     $ 333.9    
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
     
    Non-GAAP net income per share, diluted                
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
     
    Non-GAAP net income $ 452.3     $ 333.9    
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
     
        Non-GAAP shares used in diluted net income per share calculations   776.8       770.5    
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
     
    Non-GAAP net income per share, diluted $ 0.58     $ 0.43    
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
     
    Reconciliation of non-GAAP net income per share, diluted                
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
     
    GAAP net income per share, diluted $ 0.56     $ 0.39    
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
     
    Add back:                
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
     
        Non-GAAP adjustments to net income per share   0.02       0.04    
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
     
    Non-GAAP net income per share, diluted $ 0.58     $ 0.43    
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
     
     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
     
    (a) To exclude a $39.9 million gain on bargain purchase related to our acquisition of Linksys Holdings, Inc. (“Linksys”) in the three months ended March 31, 2025.
    (b) Non-GAAP financial information is adjusted to an effective tax rate of 18% and 17% in the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively, on a non-GAAP basis, which differs from the GAAP effective tax rate.
    (c) To exclude a $10.8 million gain from equity method investment in Linksys resulted from our acquisition of Linksys in the three months ended March 31, 2025.
     
    Reconciliation of net cash provided by operating activities to free cash flow
     
      Three Months Ended
     
      March 31,
    2025
      March 31,
    2024
     
    Net cash provided by operating activities $ 863.3     $ 830.4    
    Less: Purchases of property and equipment   (66.5 )     (221.9 )  
    Less: Proceeds from intellectual property matter   (14.0 )     —    
    Free cash flow $ 782.8     $ 608.5    
    Net cash used in investing activities $ (110.8 )   $ (270.3 )  
    Net cash used in financing activities $ (32.7 )   $ (30.3 )  
     
    Reconciliation of total revenue to total billings
     
      Three Months Ended
     
      March 31,
    2025
      March 31,
    2024
     
    Total revenue $ 1,539.7   $ 1,353.3    
    Add: Change in deferred revenue   57.5     54.9    
    Less: Deferred revenue balance acquired in business acquisitions   —     (1.0 )  
    Total billings $ 1,597.2   $ 1,407.2    
     
    Investor Contact: Media Contact:
     
    Aaron Ovadia
    Fortinet, Inc.
    408-235-7700
    investors@fortinet.com
    Michelle Zimmermann
    Fortinet, Inc.
    408-235-7700
    pr@fortinet.com

    The MIL Network –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Russia: Steering through the Fog: The Art and Science of Monetary Policy in Emerging Markets

    Source: IMF – News in Russian

    (As prepared for delivery)

    May 7, 2025

    Good afternoon. It is a pleasure to be with you here at this critical juncture for the global economy. Since early April, the US effective tariff rate has increased to levels last seen over a hundred years ago, and the uncertainty surrounding trade policy and geopolitics has surged.

    The economic effects of these developments are expected to be sizeable. Our World Economic Outlook ‘reference scenario’ projects that tariffs will reduce both global and emerging market (EM) output growth by roughly 0.5 percentage points relative to our forecast prior to the April tariffs. Countries imposing high tariffs, or those that are heavily dependent on trade with those countries, will be hit the hardest. But no country is likely to emerge unscathed: we have downgraded our forecasts for 127 countries that account for 86 percent of global GDP.

    The impact on inflation is more varied. For countries facing higher tariffs on their exports, the tariffs are expected to mainly operate as a negative demand shock and exert mild downward pressure on inflation.  For countries imposing much higher tariffs, notably the United States, the tariffs will likely act more as an adverse supply shock, boosting inflation while lowering growth.

    There are several reasons why economic outcomes could be much worse than our WEO reference scenario. As of now financial conditions have not tightened much, including in emerging markets, and many EM currencies have remained surprisingly resilient against the dollar. If, however, trade policy discussions do not yield lower tariffs soon, financial conditions could tighten abruptly, with major effects on capital flows to EMs.  Knightian uncertainty abounds as the global economic order transforms. How should central banks in emerging markets steer through this fog? I will address this question in today’s lecture.

     

    EM central banks have developed much stronger monetary policy frameworks since the late 1990s, often in the context of adopting inflation targeting. They have benefited from major improvements in governance, with clear mandates focused on price stability.  Their operational independence has also increased substantially — both de jure and de facto — and they have strengthened their public accountability, as well as transparency. These advancements were invaluable in helping them respond quickly both to COVID and to the subsequent inflation surge, raising interest rates sharply in the latter case to contain inflation and keep inflation expectations anchored.

    Even so, significant differences remain between EMs and AEs, especially regarding the strength of the exchange rate channel and the degree to which global factors influence monetary transmission. Several features deserve particular attention: 

    Transmission of policy actions and shocks differs in EMs

    First, monetary policy transmission appears noticeably weaker in EMs than in AEs, and dependent both on global financial conditions and on the reliance of EM banks on external financing. In advanced economies, an easing of policy rates quickly translates into lower market rates — which is what matters for the borrowing decisions of households and firms — and this boosts the economy.

    By contrast, my research with Sebnem Kalemli-Özcan and Pierre De Leo (De Leo, Gopinath and Kalemli-Özcan, 2024) shows that when EM central banks loosen policy, the transmission to short-term market rates depends critically on what happens to global financial conditions. If global financial conditions tighten enough – as often follows a surprise tightening in US monetary policy – then domestic market rates may even rise when the EM central bank lowers policy rates.  The implicit rise in the risk spread facing borrowers clearly blunts the effectiveness of monetary policy and makes it harder for EMs to cushion the effects of shocks. This is particularly relevant at the current juncture where trade shocks could play out as negative demand shocks in many EMs, calling for looser monetary policy. At the same time, they could play out as negative supply shocks in the US and call for tighter US monetary policy.

    The changing mix of EM external financing also raises new vulnerabilities. EMs have become more dependent on external financing from foreign nonbank financial institutions, including insurance companies and investment funds, with their share of external portfolio financing growing to about 40 percent. While nonbanks help diversify emerging market funding sources and reduce borrowing costs, these types of capital flows are also very sensitive to the global financial cycle.[1] At times of financial stress, investment funds—such as exchange traded funds and open-end mutual funds in particular—are more susceptible to investors withdrawing their money, which in turn causes investment funds to withdraw from the riskiest markets.  Consequently, the volume and speed of exit of capital flows have increased over time, as was evident at the start of Covid-19.

    This sensitivity of EMs to global stress may also increase given that crypto assets are playing a larger role in cross-border financial intermediation and payments, often spurred by the desire to achieve cost-efficiencies, but also to circumvent capital flow restrictions in some cases.  In most EMs, crypto asset use doesn’t yet appear high enough to present imminent systemic risks.  Even so, crypto assets are growing rapidly in many EMs, and overall usage has become a noticeable share of GDP in some EMs with high inflation and lower macroeconomic stability. For example, Cerutti, Chen and Hengge (2024) find that several EMs in Latin America and Eastern Europe fall in the upper quartile of countries in terms of the magnitude of their bitcoin inflows as a share of GDP, with monthly inflows in the range of 0.1 to 0.8% of GDP. Focusing on a wider set of crypto assets, Cardozo, Fernández, Jiang and Rojas (2024) find that cross-border crypto outflows have reached as much as a quarter of gross portfolio outflows in Brazil.

    Use of crypto requires a careful understanding of the risks.  Crypto may increase capital flow volatility and exacerbate financial stress, including by allowing investors to easily shift their deposits out of domestic banks into foreign exchange-denominated stablecoins.  If crypto flows grow large enough, such disintermediation from the banking system and associated capital outflows could cause financial conditions to tighten and the exchange rate to weaken, and potentially spur a significant economic downturn.

    Weaker policy credibility complicates monetary policy trade-offs

    A second difference between AEs and EMs is the relatively weaker credibility of EM monetary policy to deliver low inflation. While EMs have improved their frameworks substantially, inflation expectations still tend to be less well-anchored than in AEs. Consequently, there is a higher passthrough of cost shocks to inflation, as they feed through much more into inflation expectations as well as through other channels such as wage indexation.  Oil price shocks tend to impact core inflation more than twice as strongly in a sample of emerging market economies, relative to advanced ones.[2] This high passthrough makes dealing with external shocks particularly difficult for EM central banks, as second-round effects could be sizeable, including from ongoing shocks to trade policy that could disrupt supply chains and raise input costs.

    Inflation expectations also tend to be more sensitive to fiscal policy and debt in EMs. This likely reflects increased risks of fiscal dominance and political interference in central bank decisions, which can undermine the public’s confidence in the central bank’s ability to fight inflation. A surprise increase in government debt tends to boost medium-term expected inflation in EMs significantly, while having little effect in advanced economies.[3]

     

    Exchange rates have a much larger imprint on price and financial stability

    A third critical distinction between EMs and AEs is that the exchange rate has a much larger imprint on price and financial stability in EMs.  While passthrough of exchange rate changes to inflation has declined considerably for many EMs, it remains significantly higher than in advanced economies. A 10 percent depreciation of EM currencies against the dollar causes EM price levels to rise by about 2 percent, several times larger than in advanced economies.[4]

    The presence of foreign exchange mismatches increases the financial stability risks from exchange rate depreciation. While many EMs have reduced FX mismatches – or lowered the risk through the development of derivatives markets that allow for better hedging — reliance on dollar funding within the financial system remains an important source of fragility for some EMs. This weakens monetary transmission, as lowering interest rates causes the balance sheets of corporates with unhedged FX liabilities to deteriorate and financial conditions to tighten, which offsets some of the stimulus from easing. EMs that have shifted to relying more on local currency financing also can experience sharp increases in currency premia and local borrowing costs when foreign investors exit these shallow markets. This makes it harder for EMs to deal with an environment of bigger external shocks: even if a tariff abroad would look like a demand shock from the standpoint of an AE economy, the exchange rate depreciation it induces raises risk spreads and makes it harder for the EM central bank to cushion the impact on the economy. 

    Steering through the fog: How should policy respond?

    Having outlined some of the unique challenges emerging market central banks face in the current global context, I will next lay out some broad principles that can help steer through the fog. EMs clearly will differ in how they respond to the shocks and the uncertainty depending on their cyclical conditions and on structural features such as the extent of their exposure to trade and financial disruptions.

    This said, and despite the fog, EM central banks should respond forcefully to upside inflation risks if they materialize to ensure that high inflation does not get embedded into inflation expectations. While I’ve noted that we see the current configuration of tariffs as likely to be slightly disinflationary for many EMs in our reference scenario, there is a significant risk that inflationary pressures could emerge — from supply chain disruptions and higher input cost pressures in a fragmenting world or from exchange rate depreciations. 

    Given the high passthrough of both exchange rate changes and cost shocks to inflation in EMs, a major risk is large and persistent second round effects, especially if inflation has been running persistently above target and the fiscal position is weak. History has shown that once inflation becomes embedded in expectations—often through wage and price indexation mechanisms—it becomes significantly more difficult to reverse. If the risk materializes, timely and firm action is critical to keep inflation expectations anchored and reassure the public of the central bank’s unwavering commitment to sound monetary policy and price stability.

    Foreign exchange intervention should be used prudently

    Second, in a more turbulent external environment, foreign exchange intervention (FXI) can help address disorderly market conditions that undermine financial stability. The Fund’s Integrated Policy Framework is helpful in identifying conditions when it may be possible to improve tradeoffs facing central banks using FXI and other tools (IMF, 2023; Basu, Boz, Gopinath, Roch and Unsal, 2023).

    Notably, central banks can reduce exchange rate pressures by selling FX during episodes of capital flight when FX markets are shallow, allowing central banks not to have to hike policy rates sharply. This can improve macroeconomic outcomes as well as lower financial stability risks.

    However, it is important that FXI is not used to reduce exchange rate volatility per se, or to target a particular level of the exchange rate, as such misuse could easily weaken confidence in the central bank’s commitment to stabilizing inflation.  Moreover, given the finite level of reserves, the bar for FXI should be high to ensure that FX liquidity can be provided when it is really needed. As of now financial conditions have tightened in an orderly manner, which means that when it comes to FXI the advice is to keep the powder dry.

    Build financial and fiscal resilience

    Third, efforts to build financial resilience through strengthening prudential policies are also desirable. As I have emphasized, EM financial systems remain quite exposed to geopolitical shocks and face growing risks from heightened external finance from foreign nonbanks and potentially crypto. Prudential policies can help them build adequate buffers as well as reduce vulnerabilities arising from high leverage, volatile capital flows, and FX mismatches. On the crypto side, it will be important to develop comprehensive legal, regulatory and supervisory frameworks for crypto assets, including through cooperative global efforts given their cross-border nature (IMF, 2023b).  The authorities should also ensure that capital flow management measures, when appropriate, remain effective and not undermined by the use of crypto.  And EMs should continue to strengthen macroeconomic frameworks to reduce the risk of currency and asset substitution into crypto assets (often called “cryptoization”).

    Fiscal policy also plays a critical role in helping ensure macroeconomic stability. Uncertainty shocks have much bigger effects on sovereign spreads when EM debt servicing costs are relatively high. Ensuring that tax and spending policies adjust to keep debt on a sustainable path helps provide buffers to respond to downturns and lowers financial stability risks.

    Improve central bank communication, governance, and policy strategy

    Lastly, there is a high premium on further strengthening policy frameworks to continue building resilience in a more shock-prone environment. 

    Clarity of communication has become more critical than ever. Effective communication about the central bank’s reaction function –in qualitative terms – is likely to be useful in helping better anchor inflation expectations and thus improve tradeoffs.

    Improved governance – including to strengthen central bank independence – can increase public confidence that the central bank will have latitude to achieve its objectives. Central banks will inevitably make mistakes—no forecast is perfect. But what must be clear is that any deviation from target is the result of uncertainty, not political interference.

    EM central banks, as for their AE counterparts, must also adapt their policy strategies to focus more on the distribution of outcomes rather than the modal outlook, and to take more account of risk management considerations. Monetary policy must navigate a world shaped by a multiplicity of shocks—some persistent, some temporary, and some with offsetting effects on inflation where it is difficult to assess the net impact.

    Accordingly, many central banks should continue to take steps to revise their frameworks to move away from excessive reliance on central forecasts. This can be facilitated by increasing use of scenario analysis in decision-making.

    Conclusion

    To conclude, EMs have made major strides in improving their monetary policy frameworks, and this has enabled several of them to respond effectively to unprecedented shocks like the pandemic. They are now being tested again as the global economic order is reset and Knightian uncertainty prevails. This uncertainty does not, however, imply gradualism in all matters. If inflation pressures rise, EM central banks will need to respond quickly using policy rates to prevent higher inflation from getting entrenched as they did during COVID. We must recognize that the road ahead may have many unforeseen turns, which calls for further strengthening financial and fiscal resilience and navigating with monetary policy clarity, credibility, and discipline.

    References

    Baba, C., and J. Lee. 2022. “Second-round effects of oil price shocks – implications for Europe’s inflation outlook”. IMF Working Paper no. 2022/173.

    Basu, S.S., Boz, E., Gopinath, G., Roch, F., and F.D. Unsal. 2023. “Integrated monetary and financial policies for small open economies”. IMF Working Paper no. 2023/161.

    Brandão-Marques, L., Casiraghi, M., Gelos, G., Harrison, O., and G. Kamber. 2024. “Is high debt constraining monetary policy? Evidence from inflation expectations”. Journal of International Money and Finance 149(C).

    Brandão-Marques, L., Górnicka, L., and G. Kamber. 2023. “Exchange rate fluctuations in advanced and emerging economies: Same shocks, different outcomes”, in Shocks and Capital Flows, edited by Gaston Gelos and Ratna Sahay, IMF.

    Cardozo, P., Fernández, A., Jiang, J., and F.D. Rojas. 2024. “On cross-border crypto flows: Measurement, drivers, and policy implications“. IMF Working Paper no. 2024/261.

    Cerutti, E.M., Chen, J., and M. Hengge. 2024. “A primer on Bitcoin cross-border flows: Measurement and drivers“. IMF Working Paper no. 2024/85.

    Chari, A. 2023. “Global risk, non-bank financial intermediation, and emerging market vulnerabilities”. Annual Review of Economics 15: 549-572.

    De Leo, P., Gopinath, G., and S. Kalemli-Özcan. 2024. “Monetary policy and the short-rate disconnect in emerging economies”. NBER Working Paper no. 30458.

    IMF. 2023. “Integrated Policy Framework – Principles for use of foreign exchange interventions”. IMF Policy Paper no. 2023/061.

    IMF. 2023b. “Elements of effective policies for crypto assets”. IMF Policy Paper no. 2023/004.

    https://www.imf.org/en/News/Articles/2025/05/07/sp050725-science-of-monetary-policy-in-emerging-markets-gita-gopinath

    MIL OSI

    MIL OSI Russia News –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Cassidy, Rosen Introduce Legislation to Protect Sensitive Federal Data from DeepSeek, Adversarial AI Technologies

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Louisiana Bill Cassidy
    WASHINGTON – U.S. Senators Bill Cassidy, M.D. (R-LA) and Jacky Rosen (D-NV) introduced the Protection Against Foreign Adversarial Artificial Intelligence Act of 2025 to prohibit federal contractors from using DeepSeek, an artificial intelligence (AI) platform with direct ties to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), to fulfill contracts with federal agencies. DeepSeek poses a significant potential national security threat and is required by Chinese law to share the data it collects with the government of the People’s Republic of China and its intelligence agencies. Several U.S. states and allied nations have already moved to block DeepSeek from government devices due to critical security concerns.
    “AI is a powerful tool which can be used to enhance things like medicine and education. But in the wrong hands, it can be weaponized. By feeding sensitive data into systems like DeepSeek, we give China another weapon,” said Dr. Cassidy.
    “The U.S. must take steps to ensure Americans’ data and our government systems are protected against cyber threats from foreign adversaries,” said Senator Rosen. “This bipartisan legislation would prevent federal contractors from using Deepseek, a CCP-linked AI platform, when carrying out government work. I will continue working across party lines to bolster our national security and protect Americans’ data.”
    Specifically, the Protection Against Foreign Adversarial Artificial Intelligence Act of 2025 would:
    Prohibit federal contractors with an active federal contract from using DeepSeek, and any successor application developed by High-Flyer, for the fulfillment, assistance, execution, or otherwise support to complete, or support in part, a contract with an agency of the U.S. federal government. 
    Allow the U.S. Secretary of Commerce, in consultation with the U.S. Secretary of Defense, may provide a waiver, if necessary, on a case-by-case basis for national security-related or research purposes.
    Include a report to Congress from the U.S. Secretary of Commerce, in consultation with the U.S. Secretary of Defense, on the national security and economic espionage threats posed by AI platforms from adversarial nations, such as China, North Korea, Iran, and Russia.
    Background
    Cassidy has been a consistent champion for online privacy and user data protection. Earlier this year, he introduced legislation to protect U.S. servicemembers’ data from adversarial nations like China and has worked to ensure that Americans can delete their personal data collected by private data broker companies.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Russia: The Chinese Red Cross Society has formed more than 1,000 rescue teams.

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: People’s Republic of China in Russian – People’s Republic of China in Russian –

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    BEIJING, May 7 (Xinhua) — The Red Cross Society of China (RCSC) has formed more than 1,000 specialized rescue teams with a total of about 100,000 members to carry out emergency rescue operations, the RCSC said at a press conference on Wednesday.

    These teams work in eight areas, including disaster relief, medical assistance, water supply, public health, emergency transportation, psychological support, search and rescue, and water rescue.

    CRCC Vice Chairman Wang Bin said that in 2024, the organization carried out 565 emergency response measures and distributed 775,000 units of emergency aid.

    The KOKK intends to continue to actively use its network of local branches and volunteers, implement technological solutions to enhance rescue capacity and coordinate with emergency management agencies to promptly provide emergency assistance to populations affected by natural disasters.

    Bei Xiaochao, chairman of the board of the China Red Cross Foundation, stressed that the foundation uses a closed system that covers all areas of activity, from fundraising and resource allocation to monitoring compliance with accepted standards.

    According to him, the fund provides updated information on rescue operations and distribution of funds in real time and in accordance with legal regulations, publishes reports on the receipt and expenditure of donations, as well as audit reports. –0–

    MIL OSI Russia News –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Russia: Vice Premier of the State Council of China Meets with Chairman of the Management Committee of the Abu Dhabi Sovereign Wealth Fund

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: People’s Republic of China in Russian – People’s Republic of China in Russian –

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    BEIJING, May 7 (Xinhua) — Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng met with Majid Al Romaithi, chairman of the governing committee of Abu Dhabi Investment Authority (ADIA), at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing on Wednesday.

    He Lifeng, also a member of the Politburo of the CPC Central Committee, said that since the beginning of this year, China’s economy has made a solid start, high-quality development has made solid progress, and public confidence and expectations have continued to improve.

    The Vice Premier stressed that China will continue to comprehensively deepen reforms and promote high-level opening-up in various fields such as the financial sector. China welcomes foreign financial institutions including ADIA and long-term investors to do business in China and seize the development opportunities, He Lifeng added.

    Majid Al Romaithi, for his part, said that ADIA is optimistic about China’s economic prospects and looks forward to cooperation and exchanges with China in various fields. –0–

    MIL OSI Russia News –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Russia: Breaking News: China and Russia Have Found the Right Path for Coexistence of Large Neighboring Countries – Xi Jinping

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: People’s Republic of China in Russian – People’s Republic of China in Russian –

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    Moscow, May 7 /Xinhua/ — China and Russia have found the right path for coexistence between large neighboring countries, Chinese President Xi Jinping said in the Russian capital on Wednesday.

    Xi Jinping made the statement in a written speech published upon his arrival in Moscow on a state visit and to attend events marking the 80th anniversary of Victory in the Great Patriotic War.

    The Chinese leader noted that the two sides have formed a spirit of Chinese-Russian strategic interaction in the new era, which is characterized by eternal good-neighborly friendship, comprehensive strategic interaction and cooperation for mutual benefit and common gain.

    According to Xi Jinping, independent, mature and sound China-Russia relations not only bring great benefits to the two peoples, but also make important contributions to maintaining global strategic stability and building an equal and orderly multipolar world. –0–

    MIL OSI Russia News –

    May 8, 2025
←Previous Page
1 … 284 285 286 287 288 … 530
Next Page→
NewzIntel.com

NewzIntel.com

MIL Open Source Intelligence

  • Blog
  • About
  • FAQs
  • Authors
  • Events
  • Shop
  • Patterns
  • Themes

Twenty Twenty-Five

Designed with WordPress