Category: Russian Federation

  • MIL-OSI United Nations: Use Upcoming Tenth Anniversary of Minsk Accord’s Signing to Renew Diplomatic Efforts towards De-escalation in Ukraine, Assistant Secretary-General Urges Security Council

    Source: United Nations MIL OSI b

    The Minsk Agreements show that the signing of a peace pact alone does not ensure a durable end to conflict, the Security Council heard today as it met a decade after the adoption of Council resolution 2202 (2015), which called for the full implementation of those accords.

    The international community must use the 10-year anniversary as an opportunity to “recall past diplomatic efforts towards de-escalation” as well as reflect “on what happens when peacemaking fails”, Miroslav Jenča, Assistant Secretary-General for Europe, Central Asia and Americas in the Departments of Political and Peacebuilding Affairs and Peace Operations, said.  He noted that in one week, it will be “three tragic years” since the Russian Federation’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

    Highlighting the crucial role of regional and subregional organizations, he praised the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) Special Monitoring Mission for monitoring ceasefire violations and helping to maintain dialogue for “eight difficult years”.  Any peaceful settlement must respect the sovereignty, independence and territorial integrity of Ukraine, he said, welcoming all initiatives with the full participation of Ukraine and the Russian Federation.  Ensuring the conflict does not reoccur or escalate requires genuine political will and understanding of its “multidimensional complexity”, he said.

    Peace Activist Haunted by Dead Ukrainian, Russian Soldiers, Says War Could Have Been Avoided through Diplomacy

    “The people of Ukraine are divided – they are either pro- or anti-Russian,” stated Roger Waters, civil peace activist, who also addressed the Council today.  To those questioning his credentials, he said:  “I’m here to talk about war and peace and love, and my credentials are firmly in place.” “Hundreds of thousands of dead Ukrainian and Russian soldiers […] are in this room with us today [and] they haunt me,” he said. 

    Recalling the Maidan protests in Kyiv, he stressed that this is one of the problems with regime change — “dead bodies, they are somebody’s loved one”. Immediately after the Government change in 2014, Crimea seceded from Ukraine and joined the Russian Federation. “Did it secede or was it annexed?” he asked, pointing to a referendum held at the time, in which 95 per cent of Ukrainians in Crimea voted to secede. 

    The agreements — Minsk I, signed in September 2014, and Minsk II, in February 2015 — outlined steps for ending the conflict in eastern Ukraine through a political settlement.  The latter accord stipulated a ceasefire in certain areas of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions and the withdrawal of military equipment by both sides.  It also included a commitment by Kyiv to organize local elections and grant special status to the separatist-held areas in eastern Ukraine and the reinstatement of Ukraine’s full control over its border.

    Mr. Waters said that despite campaigning on the promise to resume Minsk II, Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who came to power in 2019, did not do so, and in 2022, Russian troops crossed the border to Ukraine. This war could have been avoided through diplomacy, he insisted, adding that President Zelenskyy had started talking to Russian President Vladimir Putin and by the end of April 2014, a ceasefire agreement had been agreed upon in Istanbul.  The war could have been a stillborn, but then United Kingdom Prime Minister Boris Johnson arrived in Kyiv with the message that the war should be continued as it “suits the Americans” — “the longer it takes, the better”. 

    Citing the telephone talks between United States President Donald Trump and President Putin as a potential move in the right direction, he concluded:  “Maybe there is a glimmer of light at the end of this dark tunnel of war — it comes three years and hundreds of thousands of priceless lives too late, but maybe it’s a start.”

    United States Committed to Ending Carnage, Restoring Europe’s Stability, its Speaker Says 

    Washington, D.C., is committed to ending the carnage and restoring Europe’s stability, the representative of the United States said, adding:  “We want a sovereign and prosperous Ukraine but we must start by recognizing that returning to Ukraine’s pre-2014 borders is an unrealistic objective.”  Further, he added:  “Chasing this illusionary goal will only prolong the war and cause more suffering.” At the same time, he underscored that the Russian Federation has consistently undermined the Minsk Agreement; therefore, a durable peace for Ukraine must include robust security guarantees to ensure the war will not begin again.  Describing Moscow’s illegal war of conquest as “a strategic error”, he said that “the easy way out is through negotiations”.  If Moscow, instead, “chooses the hard way”, it will incur greater and escalating costs to its economy and losses on the battlefield, he warned. 

    New United States Administration Has Created Space for Diplomacy, Russian Federation’s Representative Says 

    For his part, the Russian Federation’s delegate said that “the entry into office of the Republican United States Administration” has created space for the emergence of diplomacy.  Those who seized power in Ukraine, following the 2014 anti-constitutional coup, had no intention of implementing the Minsk Agreements, he said.  Citing statements by various Ukrainian officials who described the Agreements as “a noose on the neck” and “not binding in nature”, he said the Agreements were “a smokescreen” for Western countries while they provided Ukraine armaments. 

    Outlining lessons to draw from the failure of the Minsk process, he said European Union countries and the United Kingdom are “unfaithful to their word and they cannot be a party to any future agreement”.  Also stressing the need to provide autonomy to the east of Ukraine and guarantees for its Russian language population, he said that President Zelenskyy “is deathly afraid of elections and is doing everything possible to drag them out”.  A future Ukraine needs to be “a demilitarized neutral State, not a part of any blocs or alliances,” he said, adding that it was the prospect of the entry of Ukraine into the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) that triggered the crisis.

    Entire History of Minsk Agreement “Long List of Violations’ by Moscow”, Ukraine’s Delegate Says

    However, Ukraine’s delegate countered that the entire history of the Minsk Agreements “was a long list of violations” by Moscow.  In 2022, “on this very day”, “in this very chamber”, when her country expressed concern about the buildup of troops along its border and other developments, the Russian Federation had underscored that there is no alternative to the Minsk Agreements, she recalled.  Four days later, that country recognized the so-called independence of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions of Ukraine.  Among others, it never implemented paragraph 4 of the Minsk Protocol, concerning the establishment of a security area in the border regions of the two countries, she said.

     “It is because people of Ukraine are pro-Ukrainian [that] the Russian Federation has failed,” she added.  Any future arrangement involving the Kremlin must include enforcement mechanisms and preventive measures, she stressed, adding:  “What responsible States see as commitments to be upheld, the Russian Federation treats as a tactical ploy.”  Ukraine is working with its partners to find strong solutions, she said, stressing:  “Weak agreements will not bring real peace; they will only lead to the greater war.” 

    Other Council Members Weigh In

    Denmark’s delegate described the current meeting as “part of an ongoing disinformation campaign” to try and distract the international community from the subjugation of Ukraine.  Welcoming Ukraine’s ratification of the Rome Statute, she expressed support for a special tribunal to investigate crimes conducted in that country.  While “no one wants this war to end more than Ukraine”, the United Kingdom’s delegate said, President Putin’s preconditions for talks have been that Ukraine withdraws from large swathes of its own sovereign territory and abandons its right to choose its alliances.  “No country could accept this,” she said, reaffirming that London will provide concrete support for Ukraine for as long as needed. 

    “The Minsk Agreements were a diplomatic initiative designed to prevent further bloodshed and establish a political pathway to peace in Ukraine,” said Germany’s representative, adding that Moscow obstructed its implementation and chose to pursue expansionist conquest.  “This war should not have been started in the first place,” she stressed, calling on all States to unite behind the draft General Assembly resolution on advancing peace in Ukraine.  Along similar lines, France’s delegate highlighted the tireless mediation by Paris and Berlin, to enable Ukraine and Russian Federation to find common ground. However, Moscow chose war, he said, while Greece’s delegate stressed that “no interpretation of the Minsk Agreements can ever justify the invasion of Ukraine”.

    “We need something more than Minsk III,” Slovenia’s delegate said, adding that the abstract nature of the Agreements allowed for multiple interpretations.  Any future accord must be much be more specific with clear timelines, defined sequencing and a monitoring mechanism, he stressed.  Similarly, Somalia’s delegate underscored the importance of clarity, particularly in diplomatic tools, and said the implementation of ceasefire provisions requires robust and impartial verifying mechanisms.  The Republic of Korea’s delegate stressed that “the entire world is well aware of who is aggressor and who is the victim,” also adding that the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea’s support of the Russian Federation, with troops and munitions, is a grave violation of the Organization’s resolutions. 

    Several speakers expressed concern about the failure of diplomacy, while others called on the international community to rally behind new diplomatic efforts.  Since the onset of the Ukraine crisis, Beijing has been calling for a political solution through dialogue and has been actively engaged in diplomatic mediations, China’s representative, Council President for the month, said in his national capacity.  The legitimate security concerns of all countries should be taken seriously, he said, welcoming the Washington, D.C.-Moscow agreement to start peace talks. 

    “We have been consistent in our calls for restraint,” said Pakistan’s delegate, as he expressed regret that the Minsk Agreement could not reach just and lasting peace in the region.  “We must learn from the past so we do not commit the same errors,” Panama’s delegate added, stressing that dialogue and diplomacy is the only path to peace. 

    “The failed implementation of the Minsk Agreement cannot be the reason to prolong this war,” said Guyana’s delegate, reiterating calls for an end to the hostilities and for the withdrawal of Russian Federation’s forces from Ukraine’s territory.  “Until this day more and more civilians are losing their lives, including women and children,” pointed out Algeria’s representative, while Sierra Leone’s delegate underscored that “the conflict in Ukraine will not be resolved by military means”.

    MIL OSI United Nations News

  • MIL-OSI United Nations: Security Council Renews Sudan Sanctions Panel, Adopting Resolution 2772 (2025) by 13 Votes in Favour, 2 Abstentions

    Source: United Nations 4

    The Security Council today extended until 12 March 2026 the mandate of the Panel of Experts tasked with assisting its Sanctions Committee concerning Sudan, requesting a final report on the Panel’s findings and recommendations by 13 January 2026.

    Adopting resolution 2772 (2025) (to be issued as document S/RES/2772(2025)) by a vote of 13 in favour to none against, with 2 abstentions (China, Russian Federation), the Council — acting under Chapter VII of the Charter of the United Nations — also requested the Panel to provide the Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolution 1591 (2005) concerning Sudan with an interim report on its activities no later than 12 August.

    Further, the Council requested the Panel to provide updates regarding its activities to that Committee every three months, also expressing its intention to review the Panel’s mandate and take appropriate action regarding its further extension no later than 12 February 2026. It also encouraged all parties, Member States and international, regional and subregional organizations to ensure continued cooperation with the Panel, as well as the safety of its members.

    Speaking after the vote, the representative of the United States — the text’s main author — emphasized that the Panel’s independent reporting will facilitate both Member States’ support for Sudan and “efforts to reach a lasting resolution to a conflict that has caused the world’s largest humanitarian crisis”.  The Panel’s reporting provides unique information crucial to stemming the flow of arms and funds, stopping the fighting and supporting a civilian-led political alternative to both the Sudanese Armed Forces and the Rapid Support Forces, he added.

    Condemning the Rapid Support Forces’ recent attack on the Zamzam refugee camp in Darfur, the representative of the United Kingdom similarly underlined the continued importance of the Panel’s reporting. While welcoming the renewal of the Panel’s mandate, she said that her delegation would have preferred to retain previous language that called on the parties to cease violations of international law and condemned attacks against civilians.  She stressed:  “It is vital that this Council remain focused on protecting civilians in Sudan, given the violence being committed against so many.”

    Several Council members expressed regret that their proposal to align the extension of the Panel of Experts’ mandate with the sanctions measures imposed on Darfur was not taken on board, noting that the former’s mandate extends beyond the latter’s expiration in September.

    “This misalignment, unique to the sanctions regime in Darfur, must be addressed by the Council,” said the representative of Guyana — also speaking for Algeria, Sierra Leone and Somalia.  Nevertheless, they voted in favour of the resolution to reaffirm their continued support for the Panel of Experts, she said, expressing concern over escalating violence, arms flows and child recruitment in Sudan.

    “These developments reinforce the need for sustained monitoring and reporting by the Panel of Experts to keep the Council informed and engaged.”  However, conflict resolution requires a range of tools, and sanction measures alone have not been universally effective in restoring international peace and security.  “There must be a clear and defined pathway for the eventual lifting of sanctions, with periodic evaluations to ensure they serve their intended purpose without causing unintended consequences,” she said.

    Pakistan’s representative also expressed regret that “another opportunity was missed to align the reporting period of the Panel of Experts with that of the sanctions regime in Darfur”, pointing to the author’s “inflexibility to accommodate a six-month extension of the Panel with an automatic extension of 12 months”.  He also voiced concern that the resolution was put to the vote without accommodating the views of all Member States.

    Echoing that, the representative of the Russian Federation said that it is “unacceptable” that the Panel has been instructed to draft reports beyond the timeline of the sanctions regime itself.  “Even any hints” of extending that regime beyond Darfur is also unacceptable, he stressed, as these measures — introduced 20 years ago — “have not benefitted the Sudanese in any way”.  He added that the Panel’s activities must be impartial, “rather than using the mandate as a battering ram against the interests of the Sudanese people and Government”.

    The representative of China, Council President for February, then spoke in his national capacity to observe that the misalignment between the renewal cycles for the Panel’s mandate and the relevant sanctions regime has existed for some time — not because of the complexity of the issue, but fundamentally a lack of political will.  “The solution is quite simple,” he said, pointing out that either the Panel’s mandate or the sanctions regime itself could be extended, once, for six months.

    MIL OSI United Nations News

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: India Energy Week 2025

    Source: Government of India

    India Energy Week 2025

    Driving Global Energy Innovation and Collaboration for a Sustainable Future

    Posted On: 17 FEB 2025 6:47PM by PIB Delhi

    India is driving not only its growth but also the growth of the world, with the energy sector playing a significant role.

    -Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi

    A Global Energy Confluence

    India Energy Week (IEW) 2025, held from February 11 to 14, 2025, at the Yashobhoomi Convention Centre, New Delhi, is a premier global event in the energy sector. The event held under the patronage of the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas and organized by the Federation of Indian Petroleum Industry (FIPI) has grown into the world’s second-largest energy conference.

    A Hub of Innovation and Transformation

    The India Energy Week exhibition has grown exponentially to become the world’s new meeting place for energy professionals, with millions of dollars of business conducted onsite, positioning it at the very heart of international business.

    A key facilitator of dialogue between international and regional producers, the event provides international exhibitors with the opportunity to network with key buyers from over 120 countries across the full energy value chain. Exhibitors will have the opportunity to showcase cutting-edge technologies that drive sustainable energy solutions, forge strategic partnerships, and explore opportunities to shape the future of energy.

    Defining Achievements of IEW 2025

     Key Focus Areas of IEW 2025

    • Energy Transition & Green Future: Major focus on biofuels, flex-fuel vehicles, ethanol blending, and green hydrogen. India is steadily progressing toward its goal of producing 5 million metric tons (MMT) of green hydrogen annually by 2030.
    • Exploration & Production (E&P) Reforms: Launch of Open Acreage Licensing Program (OALP) Round X, covering 200,000 sq. km, along with regulatory changes to boost investment in oil and gas exploration.
    • India-US Energy Cooperation: Strengthening LNG supply partnerships and increasing natural gas consumption in India’s energy mix from 6% to 15%.
    • Global Energy Investments: Expanding investments in oil and gas assets across Brazil, Venezuela, Russia, and Mozambique while benefiting from emerging oil sources.
    • Startup & Innovation Recognition: The Avinya’25 – Energy Startup Challenge, led by the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, awarded innovative startups for breakthroughs in CO₂ capture, ESG solutions, and renewable energy. The Vasudha – Oil and Gas Startup Challenge recognized overseas startups revolutionizing the upstream oil and gas sector with AI-driven solutions.

    Navigating the Nine Thematic Zones

    IEW 2025 introduced nine thematic zones, each focusing on different aspects of the energy sector:

    1. Hydrogen Zone – Hosted by Oil India Limited, showcasing cutting-edge innovations in hydrogen fuel generation.
    2. Biofuels Zone – Highlighting India’s advancements in Biodiesel, Bioethanol, Compressed Biogas, and Sustainable Aviation Fuel.
    3. Renewable Energy Zone – Featuring innovations in solar, wind, and other renewable energy technologies.
    4. LNG EcoSystem – Hosted by Petronet LNG, focusing on India’s downstream LNG supply chain and eco-friendly fuel solutions.
    5. Make in India Zone – Hosted by Engineers India Limited, highlighting indigenous energy manufacturing capabilities.
    6. City Gas Distribution Zone – Hosted by GAIL, emphasizing India’s rapid progress towards a gas-based economy.
    7. Petrochem Zone – Hosted by ONGC, showcasing advancements in petrochemical technologies and sustainable solutions.
    8. Innovation Zone – Featuring emerging startups and breakthrough technologies in energy.
    9. Digitalisation Zone – Showcasing AI, IoT, and automation in optimizing energy production and distribution.

    India: The Rising Energy Powerhouse

    India, the world’s third-largest energy consumer, is poised for the highest energy demand growth. Under PM Narendra Modi’s leadership, the nation is advancing towards a greener future with significant investments in secure, sustainable, and affordable energy. India Energy Week 2025 will serve as a key platform for global collaboration, driving discussions on energy security, innovation, and sustainability.

     

    A dynamic energy landscape

    India’s Path to Sustainability

    As a rapidly advancing economic powerhouse, India faces the twin challenge of surging energy demand while mitigating its carbon footprint. In response, Hon’ble Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi launched the concept of “Panchamrit” at COP 26, representing a blend of five essential elements. “Panchamrit” underscores India’s commitment to addressing climate change and fostering sustainable growth on a global scale.

    Panchamrit: India’s Five Point Pledge Towards Climate Change

    1. India will take its non-fossil energy capacity to 500 GW by 2030
    2. By 2030, India will reduce the carbon intensity of its economy by less than 45%
    3. India will meet 50% of its energy requirements from renewable energy by 2030
    4. By the year 2070, India will achieve target of net-zero
    5. India will reduce the total projected carbon emissions by one billion tonnes till 2030

    Conclusion

    India Energy Week 2025 serves as a pivotal platform for global energy stakeholders to exchange ideas, foster partnerships, and witness India’s leadership in energy transition. As Shri Pankaj Jain, Secretary, Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, highlighted, IEW 2025 will act as a catalyst for groundbreaking projects in green hydrogen, solar advancements, and exploration technologies, reinforcing India’s commitment to sustainability and innovation. With a focus on transformative collaboration and investment, the event will shape the global energy agenda, positioning India at the forefront of energy security, technological progress, and a sustainable future.

    References

    Download in PDF

    ***

    Santosh Kumar/ Sarla Meena/ Anchal Patiyal

    (Release ID: 2104168) Visitor Counter : 19

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: The cumulative exports (merchandise & services) during April-January 2024-25 is estimated at USD 682.59 Billion, as compared to USD 636.69 Billion in April-January2023-24, an estimated growth of 7.21%.

    Source: Government of India (2)

    Ministry of Commerce & Industry

    The cumulative exports (merchandise & services) during April-January 2024-25 is estimated at USD 682.59 Billion, as compared to USD 636.69 Billion in April-January2023-24, an estimated growth of 7.21%.

    The cumulative value of merchandise exports during April-January2024-25 was USD 358.91 Billion, as compared to USD 353.97 Billion during April-January2023-24, registering a positive growth of 1.39%.

    Non-Petroleum exports in January2025 valued at USD 32.86Billion registered an increase of14.47% as compared to USD 28.71Billion in January2024.

    The cumulative Non-Petroleum exports in April-January2024-25 valued at USD 305.84Billion registered an increased of7.90% as compared to USD 283.45Billion in April-January2023-24.

    Non-petroleum & Non-Gems & Jewellery exports registered an increase of 14.33% from USD 26.12 Billion in January2024 to USD 29.87 Billion in January2025.

    Major drivers of merchandise exports growth in January2025 include Electronic Goods, Engineering Goods, Drugs & Pharmaceuticals, Rice and Gems & Jewellery.

    Electronic Goods exports increased by 78.97 % from USD 2.29 Billion in January2024 to USD 4.11 Billion in January2025.

    Engineering Goods exports increased by 7.44 % from USD 8.77 Billion in January2024 to USD 9.42 Billion in January2025.

    Drugs & Pharmaceuticals exports increased by 21.46 % from USD 2.13 Billion in January2024 to USD 2.59 Billion in January2025.

    Rice exports increased by 44.61 % from USD 0.95 Billion in January2024 to USD 1.37 Billion in January2025.

    Gems & Jewelleryexports increased by 15.95 % from USD 2.59 Billion in January2024 to USD 3 Billion in January2025.

    Posted On: 17 FEB 2025 6:15PM by PIB Delhi

    • India’s total exports (Merchandise and Services combined) for January2025* is estimated at USD 74.97 Billion, registering a positivegrowth of 9.72 percent vis-à-vis January2024.Total imports (Merchandise and Services combined) for January2025* is estimated at USD 77.64 Billion, registering a positive growth of 12.98 percent vis-à-vis January2024.

     

    Table 1: Trade during January2025*

     

     

    January2025

    (USD Billion)

    January2024

    (USD Billion)

    Merchandise

    Exports

    36.43

    37.32

    Imports

    59.42

    53.88

    Services*

    Exports

    38.55

    31.01

    Imports

    18.22

    14.84

    Total Trade

    (Merchandise +Services) *

    Exports

    74.97

    68.33

    Imports

    77.64

    68.72

    Trade Balance

    -2.67

    -0.39

    * Note: The latest data for services sector released by RBI is for December2024. The data for January2025 is an estimation, which will be revised based on RBI’s subsequent release. (ii) Data for April-January2023-24 and April-September2024 has been revised on pro-rata basis using quarterly balance of payments data.

    Fig 1: Total Trade during January2025*

    • India’s total exports during April-January2024-25* is estimated at USD 682.59 Billion registering a positive growth of 7.21 percent. Total imports during April-January2024-25* is estimated at USD 770.06 Billion registering a growth of 8.96 percent.

    Table 2: Trade during April-January2024-25*

     

     

    April-January2024-25

    (USD Billion)

    April-January2023-24

    (USD Billion)

    Merchandise

    Exports

    358.91

    353.97

    Imports

    601.90

    560.27

    Services*

    Exports

    323.68

    282.71

    Imports

    168.17

    146.48

    Total Trade

    (Merchandise +Services) *

    Exports

    682.59

    636.69

    Imports

    770.06

    706.75

    Trade Balance

    -87.47

    -70.06

    Fig 2: Total Trade during April-January2024-25*      

        

    MERCHANDISE TRADE

    • Merchandise exports during January2025 were USD 36.43 Billion as compared to USD 37.32 Billion in January2024.
    • Merchandise imports during January2025 were USD 59.42 Billion as compared to USD 53.88 Billion in January2024.

     

    Fig 3: Merchandise Trade during January2025

    • Merchandise exports during April-January2024-25 were USD 358.91 Billion as compared to USD 353.97Billion during April-January2023-24.
    • Merchandise imports during April-January2024-25 were USD 601.90 Billion as compared to USD 560.27 Billion during April-January2023-24.
    • Merchandise trade deficit during April-January2024-25 was USD 242.99 Billion as compared to USD 206.29 Billion during April-January2023-24.

    Fig4: Merchandise Trade during April-January2024-25

    • Non-petroleum and non-gems & jewellery exports in January2025 were USD 29.87Billion compared to USD 26.12Billion in January2024.
    • Non-petroleum, non-gems & jewellery (gold, silver & precious metals) imports in January2025 were USD 41.20Billion compared to USD 34.23Billion in January2024.

     

    Table 3: Trade excluding Petroleum and Gems & Jewellery during January2025

     

    January2025

    (USD Billion)

    January2024

    (USD Billion)

    Non- petroleum exports

    32.86

    28.71

    Non- petroleum imports

    45.99

    38.35

    Non-petroleum & Non-Gems & Jewellery exports

    29.87

    26.12

    Non-petroleum & Non-Gems & Jewellery imports

    41.20

    34.23

    Note: Gems & Jewellery Imports include Gold, Silver & Pearls, precious & Semi-precious stones

    Fig 5: Trade excluding Petroleum and Gems & Jewellery during January2025

    • Non-petroleum and non-gems & jewellery exports in April-January2024-25 were USD 281.46 Billion, compared to USD 256.56 Billion in April-January2023-24.
    • Non-petroleum, non-gems & jewellery (gold, silver & precious metals) imports in April-January2024-25 were USD 378.34 Billion, compared to USD 354.86 Billion in April-January2023-24.

    Table 4: Trade excluding Petroleum and Gems & Jewellery during April-January2024-25

     

    April-January2024-25

    (USD Billion)

    April-January2023-24

    (USD Billion)

    Non- petroleum exports

    305.84

    283.45

    Non- petroleum imports

    447.06

    414.77

    Non-petroleum &Non Gems& Jewellery exports

    281.46

    256.56

    Non-petroleum & Non Gems & Jewellery imports

    378.34

    354.86

    Note: Gems & Jewellery Imports include Gold, Silver & Pearls, precious & Semi-precious stones

    Fig 6: Trade excluding Petroleum and Gems & Jewellery during April-January2024-25

    SERVICES TRADE

    • The estimated value of services export for January2025* is USD 38.55 Billion as compared to USD 31.01Billion in January2024.
    • The estimated value of services imports for January2025* is USD 18.22 Billion as compared to USD 14.84Billion in January2024.

    Fig 7: Services Trade during January2025*

    • The estimated value of service exports during April-January2024-25* is USD 323.68 Billion as compared to USD 282.71 Billion in April-January2023-24.
    • The estimated value of service imports during April-January2024-25* is USD 168.17 Billion as compared to USD 146.48 Billion in April-January2023-24.
    • The services trade surplus for April-January2024-25* is USD 155.52 Billion as compared to USD 136.23 Billion in April-January2023-24.

    Fig 8: Services Trade during April-January2024-25*

    • Exports ofOther Cereals  (103.2%), Electronic Goods (78.97%), Tobacco (59.18%), Coffee (57.07%), Rice (44.61%), Jute Mfg. Including Floor Covering (40.67%), Meat, Dairy & Poultry Products (35.66%), Mica, Coal & Other Ores, Minerals Including Processed Minerals (27.71%), Tea (21.97%), Drugs & Pharmaceuticals (21.46%), Handicrafts Excl. Hand Made Carpet (19.49%), Carpet (18.04%), Cotton Yarn/Fabs./Made-Ups, Handloom Products Etc. (16.41%), Gems & Jewellery (15.95%), Plastic & Linoleum (13.31%), Man-Made Yarn/Fabs./Made-Ups Etc. (12.14%), Rmg Of All Textiles (11.45%), Cereal Preparations & Miscellaneous Processed Items (11.13%), Ceramic Products & Glassware (10.44%), Marine Products (7.98%), Engineering Goods (7.44%), Cashew (6.85%), Leather & Leather Products (6.37%), Spices (2.32%) and Fruits & Vegetables (0.81%) record positive growth during January2025 over the corresponding month of last year.
    • Imports of Project Goods (-48.14%), Pearls, Precious & Semi-Precious Stones (-29.11%), Coal, Coke & Briquettes, Etc. (-15.22%) and Petroleum, Crude & Products (-13.49%) record negative growth during January2025 over the corresponding month of last year.
    • Services exports is estimated to grow by 14.49percent during April-January2024-25* over April-January2023-24.
    • Top 5 export destinations, in terms of change in value, exhibiting positive growth in January2025 vis a vis January2024 are U S A (39.02%), Japan (53.53%), Bangladesh Pr (17.27%), U K (14.84%) and Nepal (20.84%).
    • Top 5 export destinations, in terms of change in value, exhibiting positive growth in April-January2024-25 vis a vis April-January2023-24 are U S A (8.95%), U Arab Emts (6.82%), Netherland (9.17%), U K (14.17%) and Japan (21.12%).
    • Top 5 import sources, in terms of change in value, exhibiting growth in January2025 vis a vis January2024 are China P Rp (17.06%), Thailand (136.63%), U S A (33.46%), Germany (72.15%) and U K (101.62%).
    • Top 5 import sources, in terms of change in value, exhibiting growth in April-January2024-25 vis a vis April-January2023-24 are U Arab Emts (35.58%), China P Rp (10.6%), Russia (7.17%), Switzerland (16.61%) and Thailand (32.59%).

    *Link for Quick Estimates

    ***

    Abhishek Dayal /  Abhijith Narayanan

    (Release ID: 2104150)

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Russian gas imports into the EU – P-000637/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Priority question for written answer  P-000637/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Liudas Mažylis (PPE)

    After Russia launched its full-scale war against Ukraine in 2022, the EU set itself the objective of stopping all imports of Russian fossil fuels by 2027 as part of its sustainability efforts. However, imports from Russia were higher in 2024 than in 2023, and imports of natural gas, including liquefied natural gas (LNG), continued to grow in 2025. The European Parliament has made clear its political will not to finance the Russian war machine, in particular through the purchase of LNG.

    Could the Commission answer the following questions:

    • 1.How does the Commission intend to address the problem of increasing Russian gas imports into the EU, and what specific measures does it intend to take in this regard?
    • 2.Does the Commission not feel that LNG trade restrictions should be included in a regular sanctions package against Russia?

    Submitted: 11.2.2025

    Last updated: 17 February 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Video: Noon Briefing Guest Tomorrow, Secretary-General/African Union & other topics – Daily Press Briefing

    Source: United Nations (Video News)

    Noon Briefing by Stéphane Dujarric, Spokesperson for the Secretary-General.

    – Noon Briefing Guest Tomorrow
    – Secretary-General/African Union
    – Security Council

    NOON BRIEFING GUEST/TOMORROW
    Tomorrow, noon briefing guest will be Muhannad Hadi, the UN Deputy Special Coordinator for the Middle East Peace Process, Resident Coordinator and Humanitarian Coordinator. He will join virtually from Jerusalem and will brief reporters on the situation in Gaza.

    SECRETARY-GENERAL/AFRICAN UNION
    The Secretary-General is back in New York after attending the African Union summit in Addis Ababa.
    In a press conference as he departed on Saturday, the Secretary-General said that over three days in Addis Ababa, he had met many leaders from across the continent to discuss challenges across the spectrum. And he emphasizes that despite the many tests facing Africa, we start from a position of strength. 
    At the same time, the Secretary-General drew attention to a United Nations Security Council where Africa still inexplicably lacks permanent representation and an international financial architecture where the power and place of Africa is not fairly at the table.

    SECURITY COUNCIL
    This morning, the Security Council held a briefing on threats to international peace and security. Briefing Council members, Miroslav Jenča, the Assistant Secretary-General for Europe, Central Asia, and the Americas, noted that in one week, we will mark three tragic years since Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, launched in violation of the UN Charter and international law. In this context, Mr. Jenča said, today’s ten-year anniversary of Security Council resolution 2202 – that called for the full implementation of the now defunct Minsk agreements – is an opportunity to recall past diplomatic efforts towards de-escalation and a peaceful settlement of the conflict.
    He noted that the Secretary-General has underlined, time and again, that any peaceful settlement must respect the sovereignty, independence and territorial integrity of Ukraine, in line with the UN Charter, international law and resolutions of the General Assembly. Mr. Jenča said that the UN encourages dialogue among all stakeholders and welcomes all genuine efforts and initiatives, with the full participation of Ukraine and the Russian Federation, that would alleviate the impact of the war on civilians and de-escalate the conflict.

    Full Highlights: https://www.un.org/sg/en/content/noon-briefing-highlight?date%5Bvalue%5D%5Bdate%5D=17%20February%202025

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l-n3KMw0ysQ

    MIL OSI Video

  • MIL-OSI Global: Europe left scrambling in face of wavering US security guarantees

    Source: The Conversation – UK – By Stefan Wolff, Professor of International Security, University of Birmingham

    European leaders are scrambling to respond to what looks like the end of reliable US protection of the continent. It is unclear what the “main European countries” (which includes the UK) might be able to agree at a hastily convened meeting in Paris on Monday February 17. But individual countries, including the UK and Germany, have come forward to put concrete offers on the table for Ukraine’s security, which could include putting their troops on the ground.

    This unusual circling of the wagons was triggered by the 2025 Munich Security Conference, which ended the previous day. It brought to a close a week of remarkable upheaval for Europe, leaving no doubt that two already obvious trends in the deteriorating transatlantic relationship accelerated further.

    What the world saw was unabashed US unilateralism when it comes to the war in Ukraine. Ominously, there was also a clear indication of the extent of American intentions to interfere in the domestic political processes of European countries – most notably the upcoming German parliamentary elections on February 23.

    None of this should have come as a surprise. But the full-force assault by Donald Trump’s envoys to Europe was still sobering – especially once all its implications are considered. What was, perhaps, more surprising was that European leaders pushed back and did so in an unusually public and unequivocal way.

    Over the course of just a few days, two of the worst European fears were confirmed. First, the Trump administration is pushing ahead with its idea of a US-Russia deal to end the war in Ukraine. And all the signs are that Washington plans to leave Ukraine and the EU out of any negotiations and to their own devices when it comes to post-ceasefire security arrangements.

    On February 12, the US president announced he had spoken at length with Russian president Vladimir Putin, and subsequently informed Ukraine’s president Volodymyr Zelensky of the conversation. The same day, US defence secretary Pete Hegseth, confirmed at a press conference after a meeting of Nato defence ministers in Brussels that direct negotiations between Russia and the US would begin immediately. They will not include any European or Ukrainian officials, he said.

    Hegseth also poured cold water on any hopes that there would be robust US security guarantees for Ukraine. He explicitly ruled out US troops for any peacekeeping forces deployed by other Nato members, or that any attack on those forces would be considered an attack on the whole alliance under article 5 of the Nato treaty.

    The European response was swift and, at least on paper, decisive. Right after Hegseth’s comments in Brussels, the Weimar+ group (Germany, France, Poland + Italy, Spain, the United Kingdom, the EU’s diplomatic service and the European Commission) issued a joint statement reiterating their commitment to enhanced support in defence of Ukraine’s independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity.

    On February 14, the EU’s top officials – European council president António Costa and European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen – met with Zelensky on the margins of the conference. They assured him of the EU’s “continued and stable support to Ukraine until a just, comprehensive and lasting peace is reached”.

    The following day, Costa’s speech in Munich reiterated this commitment. Similar to earlier comments by Nato’s secretary general, Mark Rutte, Costa underlined Europe’s determination to “to act better, stronger and faster in building the Europe of defence”.

    But these declarations of the EU’s determination to continue supporting Ukraine do not reflect consensus inside the Union on such a position. Weimar+ only includes a select number of EU member states, institutions and the UK, underlining the continuing difficulties in achieving unanimity on critical security and defence issues. Unsurprisingly, Hungary’s prime minister, Viktor Orbán, issued a scathing condemnation of the Weimar+ statement as a “sad testament of bad Brusselian leadership”.

    Orbán’s comments play right into many Europeans’ fears about another dark side of Trump’s agenda when it comes to transatlantic relations. As foreshadowed in the influential Project 2025 report by a coalition of conservative US thinktanks, the Trump administration is intent on weakening European unity. This will include preventing the UK from slipping “back into the orbit of the EU” and “developing new allies inside the EU – especially the Central European countries”.

    Opening up divides

    The US vice-president, J.D. Vance, used his speech in Munich to claim that the real threat to European security was not coming from Russia or China, but rather “from within”. He went on to chide “EU commissars” and insinuated that Europe’s current leaders had more in common with the “tyrannical forces on this continent” who lost the cold war.

    In Romania, where presidential elections were cancelled after evidence of massive Russian election interference emerged, opposition parties revelled in Vance’s comments that the move had been based on the “flimsy suspicions of an intelligence agency and enormous pressure from its continental neighbours”. The vice-president has further exacerbated political divisions in a key European and Nato ally right on the border with Ukraine.

    Vance subsequently sought out Alice Weidel, the co-leader of the right-wing Alternative for Germany (AfD). The pair reportedly discussed the war in Ukraine, German domestic politics and the so-called brandmauer. This is the agreement between centre-right and left-wing parties in Germany to form a “firewall” to prevent extreme right-wing parties from joining coalitions, which has recently been weakened.

    Their meeting was widely criticised as yet another American attempt for the party to boost its chances at Germany’s upcoming parliamentary elections on February 23. Referring to Germany’s historical experience with Nazism, the German chancellor, Olaf Scholz defended the need to hold the line against far-right political parties like the AfD.

    Polar shift

    There have been many watershed moments and wake-up calls for Europe in the past. What is different now is that a new multipolar order is emerging – and Europe is not one of its poles. Equally importantly, given the determination of this US administration to upend the existing international order, Europe is not a part of any pole anymore either.

    Simultaneously at stake are European unity and the transatlantic relationship. These are the two key pillars that have ensured European security, democracy and prosperity since the end of the second world war. Out of necessity, Europe will most likely have to adjust to a much-weakened transatlantic relationship. But the European project will not survive without unity.

    This is a critical juncture for Europe. The continent needs to define its future place and role in the dysfunctional love triangle of Trump, Putin and Xi, a triumvirate that will shape and dominate the new global order.

    Stefan Wolff is a past recipient of grant funding from the Natural Environment Research Council of the UK, the United States Institute of Peace, the Economic and Social Research Council of the UK, the British Academy, the NATO Science for Peace Programme, the EU Framework Programmes 6 and 7 and Horizon 2020, as well as the EU’s Jean Monnet Programme. He is a Trustee and Honorary Treasurer of the Political Studies Association of the UK and a Senior Research Fellow at the Foreign Policy Centre in London.

    ref. Europe left scrambling in face of wavering US security guarantees – https://theconversation.com/europe-left-scrambling-in-face-of-wavering-us-security-guarantees-249978

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI United Nations: Sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine paramount, Security Council hears

    Source: United Nations 2

    Peace and Security

    A senior UN political affairs official on Monday reaffirmed that any peace deal in Ukraine must respect the country’s sovereignty, independence, and territorial integrity, in accordance with the UN Charter and international law.

    Briefing ambassadors in the Security Council ahead of the third anniversary of Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Miroslav Jenča, Assistant Secretary-General for Europe in the political and peacebuilding department (DPPA), stressed diplomatic efforts must focus on securing a just and lasting peace.

    Full participation of Ukraine, Russia

    “The United Nations encourages dialogue among all stakeholders and welcomes all genuine efforts and initiatives, with the full participation of Ukraine and the Russian Federation, that would alleviate the impact of the war on civilians and de-escalate the conflict,” he said.

    He also reiterated Secretary-General António Guterres’ position that “any peaceful settlement must respect the sovereignty, independence and territorial integrity of Ukraine, in line with the UN Charter, international law and resolutions of the General Assembly.”

    The Security Council session coincided with the 10th anniversary of resolution 2202, which endorsed the now-defunct Minsk agreements of 2015 signed by the representatives of European security pact, the OSCE, Russia, Ukraine and leaders of the pro-Russian separatists in the occupied east of Ukraine following Russia’s annexation of Crimea.

    The unanimously adopted resolution included a “package of measures” as its annex, including an immediate and comprehensive ceasefire in the Donetsk and Luhansk regions of Ukraine, as well as the withdrawal of all heavy weapons by both sides by equal distances to create a security zone.

    A stark reminder

    Mr. Jenča noted that the anniversary serves as a stark reminder of past diplomatic efforts to de-escalate tensions and as an opportunity to reflect on the consequences of failing to forge a peace through international diplomacy.

    He commended the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission for its eight years of work in tracking ceasefire violations and facilitating dialogue, noting that the experience offers key lessons for future diplomatic efforts.

    The Minsk agreements have taught us that agreeing on a ceasefire or the signing of an agreement alone do not ensure a durable end to the violence,” Mr. Jenča said.

    “Ensuring that the conflict does not reoccur and does not escalate will require genuine political will and understanding of its multi-dimensional complexity, for Ukraine and for the region.”

    More to follow…

    MIL OSI United Nations News

  • MIL-OSI USA News: Remarks by President Trump After Air Force One Arrival

    Source: The White House

    class=”has-text-align-center”>Palm Beach International Airport

    West Palm Beach, Florida

    (February 16, 2025)

    4:00 P.M. EST

         THE PRESIDENT:  So, Daytona was fantastic.  The crowd was amazing.  The people love that sport, and they’re wonderful people that run it.  And they had a little rain delay, but we’ll go home and watch it, I guess — or some of you will.  And others will try and create peace throughout the world.

         Do you have any questions, please?

         Q    Sir, did you speak to Secretary Rubio this morning?

         THE PRESIDENT:  I did.

         Q    What is the latest with the negotiations in Saudi Arabia?  What’s he taki- —

         THE PRESIDENT:  We’re moving along.  We’re trying to get a peace with Russia-Ukraine, and we’re working very hard on it.  It’s a war that should have never started.

         Q    Do you expect Zelenskyy to be involved in these conversations?  What will his role be?

         THE PRESIDENT:  Yeah, I do.  I do.  He will be involved, yes.

         Q    Mr. President, would you allow the Europeans to buy U.S.-made weapons for Ukrainians?

         THE PRESIDENT:  Yeah, I would.

         Q    Sir, Zelenskyy said today that Russia is going to wage war on NATO.  Do you — do you agree with that?  Do you have any concerns about —

         THE PRESIDENT:  No, I don’t agree.  I don’t agree with that.  Not even a little bit.

         Q    Vice President Vance said that the United States would potentially take military action against Russia if they won’t come to an agreement.  Do you agree with that stance?

         THE PRESIDENT:  I don’t know if that’s what he said.  I don’t think he said that.

         Q    Sir, based on your conversations — based on your conversations with President Putin, what do you think he wants, ultimately, in Ukraine?

         THE PRESIDENT:  I think he wants to stop fighting.  I see that.  We spoke long and hard.  Steve Witkoff was with him for a very extended period, like about three hours.  I think he wants to stop fighting.

         They have a big, powerful machine.  You understand that.  And they defeated Hitler, and they defeated Napoleon.  You know, they’ve been fighting a long time.  They’ve done it before and — but I think he would like to stop fighting.

         Q    Do you think he wants the whole of Ukraine, or just a pa- — like, what do you think he wants in terms territory?

         THE PRESIDENT:  No, I think he wants to stop.  That was my question to him.  Because if he’s going to go on, that would have been a big problem for us, and that would have caused me a big problem, because you just can’t let that happen. 

         I think he wants to end it, and they want to end it fast — both of them.  And Zelenskyy wants to end it too.

         Q    Sir, when do you think that could actually happen?  When do you think the fighting can stop?

         THE PRESIDENT:  Well, we’re working to get it done.  I mean, you know, it’s too bad it started.  It would have been a lot easier to end it before it started.  Right?  But it started because we had an incompetent president that — he didn’t know what he was doing.  That should have never started.

         That war was so easy to stop.  Remember this: that under Bush, they took a lot.  Under Obama, they took a lot.  Under Biden, they’re trying to take the whole thing.  And under Trump, they took nothing — nothing.  Nothing was gone, not even a little bit.  So, it’s too bad.  It’s really too bad. 

         A lot of people are dead right now that should be alive, and a lot of cities are destroyed that can never come back like they were.  Those beautiful golden domes and all of the multi-colored domes that were 1,000 years old, they’re all laying in — you know, just shattered.  So, it’s very sad.  They ruined a culture.

         Q    They’re beginning phase two — they’re beginning phase two of the ceasefire deal —

         THE PRESIDENT:  Yeah.

         Q    — between Israel and Hama- — Hamas.  What is — what’s going on there?  Have you been briefed on the latest relating to that?

         THE PRESIDENT:  Well, I told you — I have been briefed.  I told Bibi, “You do whatever you want.”  Because, you know, my statement was, “They got to come back now.”  The reason I made that statement: because they said they weren’t going to deliver — they were not going to deliver the people that they said they were going to deliver, that they agreed to deliver.  And they did agree to do that, but they broke that agreement.  When I made the statement, they delivered everybody, plus an American.

         Now, the good news is, they look like they’re in pretty good shape, because the people from the week before didn’t look like they were in good shape.  They looked like Holocaust survivors, frankly — horrible.  Whatever happened to them was horrible.
        
         But that will be up to Israel what the next step is, in consultation with me.

         Q    Sir, what would the — what are they supposed to use these weapons for that you’ve now allowed to be shipped?  Given the fact that there’s a ceasefire supposed to be in effect, why ship those big bombs now?

         THE PRESIDENT:  Peace through strength.  You understand that, right?  It’s called peace through strength.  You know, they contracted for those weapons a long time ago, in the Biden administration, and then Biden wouldn’t deliver the weapons.

         But I look at it differently.  I say “peace through strength.”  They were sitting there.  Nobody knew what to do with them.  They bought them.  But I believe in that very strongly.

         Q    On the EU —

         Q    Sir, do you have an update on your —

         Q    Sir, on the EU.  The — the European Union is talking about banning food imports from the U.S., kind of along the lines of your reciprocal tariffs.

         THE PRESIDENT:  Why is that?  Why?

         Q    They says it’s like the reciprocal tariffs.  They don’t like the (inaudible) —

         THE PRESIDENT:  That’s all right.  I don’t mind.  Let them do it.  Let them do it.  They’re just hurting themselves if they do that.  I can’t imagine it, but doesn’t matter.

         We’re having reciprocal tariffs.  Whatever they charge, we charge.  Very simple.

         If a certain country, like India, which is very high tariff — if they charge us X dollars, we charge them X dollars.  It’s all right.  It’s a fair — it’s a fair thing to do.  Even the media said it was fair.  And it’s going to be very good for the United States.

         Q    Do you have an update on your timing of your meeting with Putin in Saudi Arabia?

         THE PRESIDENT:  No, we — there’s no time set, but it could be very soon.

         Q    Like this — this month or —

         THE PRESIDENT:  Well, it’ll be soon.  We’ll see what happens.  But they’re meeting right now, and that’s more — I mean, this should have been done four years ago — three years ago, before it started.  But it should have been done immediately after it started, as opposed to now, three years later.

         Q    Sir, egg prices have reached an all-time high.  What’s your administra- —

         THE PRESIDENT:  Which is?  What?

         Q    Egg prices have reached an all-time high.

         THE PRESIDENT:  Well, there’s the flu.  And it was a long — before I ever got here, it was at an all-time — this didn’t st- — remember, I’ve been here for three weeks.  And when you saw the inflation numbers, I’ve been here for three weeks.  I have had nothing to do with inflation.  This was caused by Biden.
        
         I had four years of virtually no inflation.  So, I’m just taking over.

         But I’ll tell you what, this country has made more progress in the last three weeks than it’s made in the last four years, and we’re respected again as a country.

         Thank you very much.  Thank you.

                                  END                    4:07 P.M. EST

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Ukraine’s voice must be at the heart of any peace negotiations: UK statement at the UN Security Council

    Source: United Kingdom – Government Statements

    Statement by Ambassador Barbara Woodward, UK Permanent Representative to the UN, at the UN Security Council meeting on threats to international peace and security.

    President, Russia is once again using this meeting in an attempt to distort the truth behind its illegal war. I will make three points about lessons.

    First, the events of the last decade in Ukraine originate from a simple, sad reality: Russia’s imperialist ambition and failure to respect Ukraine’s sovereignty.

    Russia is a reliable party to agreements or treaties. 

    In freely signing up to the Minsk Agreements, Russia had the opportunity to ensure peace. 

    Russia and Ukraine were the sole parties to these agreements.  

    And this Council consistently called on all parties to implement their commitments in full, right up until the moment when President Putin decided that, on 22 February 2022, I quote the Minsk Agreement ‘no longer existed.’

    Second, Russia continues to violate the UN Charter and international law in multiple ways.

    In its war in Ukraine, Russia has targeted civilians and civilian infrastructure, hospitals, schools, energy infrastructure, it has abducted children, it has raped women, it has compromised nuclear safety and security, flouted international law, and tortured detainees. 

    For all these reasons, it is no surprise that the ICJ has issued an indictment on President Putin.

    We will not tolerate Russia’s attempts to spread disinformation and divert this Council’s attention away from its atrocities, or efforts to subjugate a sovereign state.

    Russia is the sole architect of the war in Ukraine and could end it now if it chose to by withdrawing its forces. 

    Third lesson is that the international community must stand firm in support of peace and security.

    No one wants this war to end more than Ukraine.

    But Putin’s so-called preconditions for talks – reaffirmed by his deputy Foreign Minister just a few days ago – have been that Ukraine withdraw from its own sovereign territory, and abandon its sovereign right to choose its alliances. 

    No country could or should accept this.

    We can and must create the conditions for a just and lasting peace, which protects Ukraine’s security, sovereignty and independence. 

    This will require robust security arrangements from the outset, which ensure that Russia is never able to invade again. 

    Putin has shown time and again that he will break a weak deal.

    The UK will continue to play our part. 

    We will continue to provide concrete support for Ukraine’s self-defence and security for as long as it is needed. 

    And we are clear that Ukraine’s voice must be at the heart of any negotiations.

    Let me conclude, President, by reminding Russia that the suffering of so many Ukrainians today simply would not exist if Russia fulfilled its most basic obligation as a member of the United Nations: to respect the principles of the UN Charter.

    Updates to this page

    Published 17 February 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Joint Statement by the Saudi Finance Minister and IMF Managing Director at the conclusion of the Inaugural Al Ula Economic Conference for Emerging Market Economies

    Source: IMF – News in Russian

    February 17, 2025

    Al Ula, Saudi Arabia – February 17, 2025: A two-day inaugural annual global Conference on Emerging Market Economies was held in Al Ula, Saudi Arabia from February 16-17, co-hosted by the Saudi Finance Ministry and the International Monetary Fund (IMF). Mohammed Aljadaan, Finance Minister of Saudi Arabia, and Kristalina Georgieva, Managing Director of the IMF, made the following statement at the end of the conference:

    “We would like to thank Emerging Markets policymakers, academics, and representatives of the regional and international financial institutions for joining us and helping to make this first-ever Al Ula Economic Conference for Emerging Market Economies a successful forum for building greater collaboration and discussing the specific challenges facing emerging markets (EMs).

    “Over the past two days, we have discussed how emerging economies can navigate the risks and, importantly how they can embrace the opportunities ahead. One common emerging theme is the importance of unity of purpose and the need to continue working together to sustain EM economies’ resilience to shocks and sustain growth. Three takeaways to highlight:

     “First, this is a time of sweeping transformations—from technology to trade, or climate to capital flows. And these changes are reshaping the global economy. How all these changes will unfold remains to be seen. But we know that in a more uncertain and shock-prone world, building resilience through sound macroeconomic and financial policies must continue to be a priority.

    “Second, emerging markets are seizing these transformations to make their economies stronger. With widespread digitalization and ambitious policies, the prospects for harnessing the benefits of AI are promising. Tapping the potential of AI would enhance Emerging Market Economies’ productivity and resilience, but it will require reforms to boost investments in digital infrastructure and human capital. Deeper regional trade and financial integration would also be important.

    “Third, while these transformations offer great opportunities, we must work together to help avoid the very real risk of some countries falling behind. The first line of defense will of course be strong domestic policies and reforms to help seize these opportunities. But the international community can also support countries and reduce the risk of growing divergence.

    “We are proud to have co-hosted the first global forum that is focused solely on the economic prospects for Emerging Market Economies and we look forward to continuing the discussions in the year ahead and at the second Al Ula conference next year.”

    IMF Communications Department
    MEDIA RELATIONS

    PRESS OFFICER: Wafa Amr

    Phone: +1 202 623-7100Email: MEDIA@IMF.org

    https://www.imf.org/en/News/Articles/2025/02/17/pr-25039-saudi-arabia-joint-statement-by-the-saudi-finance-minister-and-imf-md

    MIL OSI

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Tatyana Golikova and Veronika Skvortsova opened the Center for Cognitive and Psychoemotional Health of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency of Russia

    Translartion. Region: Russians Fedetion –

    Source: Government of the Russian Federation – An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.

    Previous news Next news

    Tatyana Golikova and Veronika Skvortsova opened the Center for Cognitive and Psychoemotional Health of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency of Russia

    Deputy Prime Minister Tatyana Golikova and the head of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency Veronika Skvortsova opened the Center for Cognitive and Psychoemotional Health of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency of Russia, which was created as a reference model for further scaling throughout the country.

    The center was opened on the basis of the Federal Center for Brain and Neurotechnology of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency of Russia, which combines the latest diagnostic and rehabilitation technologies, scientific and human resources potential and is one of the leading medical institutions in the country.

    “Today we have looked a little into the future. This is a unique innovative, scientific, educational, medical and production complex that allows us to develop the latest technologies. The technologies that have become possible here will be distributed throughout the Russian Federation, to those medical institutions that will use these methods and promote them. This is a huge part of the work that the Federal Medical and Biological Agency has done on behalf of the head of state. The development of these technologies became possible as a result of the implementation of the national project “Healthcare” and within the framework of the national projects “Long and Active Life” and “New Health Preservation Technologies” that have been “moving across the country” since January 1, 2025 – a technological leadership project that is designed to develop and promote technologies related to both maintaining health and achieving goals throughout the country,” said Tatyana Golikova.

    The tasks of the Center for Cognitive and Psychoemotional Health include scientific activities, development of new methods of treatment and diagnostics, implementation of new standards of therapy, creation of a system of objective assessment and support of human cognitive health.

    The best specialists are gathered here – neurologists, psychologists, psychotherapists, rehabilitation specialists and psychiatrists – for comprehensive work on the preservation and restoration of cognitive functions.

    In addition, the center’s work focuses on interaction with healthy people. Its goal is to prevent cognitive and psycho-emotional disorders, as well as to draw attention to the need to take care of one’s own mental health.

    “It is important that this reference center for cognitive and psycho-emotional health was created in the high-tech Center for Brain and Neurotechnology, which allows, when signs of ill health are found, to accurately identify the cause of these signs using a variety of diagnostic methods – genetic, morphological, visualization methods, neurophysiology and other functional methods. Thus, to help each person in a personalized, most targeted way,” Veronika Skvortsova emphasized.

    For the first time, a multidisciplinary approach and correction methods and protocols that have proven themselves in neurorehabilitation carried out at the Federal Center for Brain and Neurotechnology of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency of Russia have been applied to the correction of cognitive and psychoemotional disorders, which traditionally belong to the field of neurology and psychoneurology. It is rehabilitation approaches that have proven effective in the correction of neurological syndromes.

    A technological algorithm has been created that allows any person, healthy or sick, to undergo testing for basic cognitive functions – memory, attention, speed of thinking and others, to identify anxiety, subdepression, depression, internal excitement and so on.

    The structure of the center includes a scientific department of cognitive disorders, which has access to all the advanced diagnostic and treatment capacities of the Federal Center for Brain and Neurotechnology, and they are also available to the center’s patients. This allows for not only treatment, but also educational and scientific activities. Educational programs have been developed for training specialists of multidisciplinary “cognitive” teams, transfer of the center’s methods – both on the basis of the Brain Center and in a remote format.

    Many cognitive and psycho-emotional health disorders in adulthood and old age have their roots in problems that appear in childhood. Therefore, the Center for Cognitive and Psycho-Emotional Health also accepts children, for which purpose multidisciplinary teams have been created, consisting of leading pediatric neurologists, speech therapists, physical and rehabilitation medicine doctors, and psychologists.

    In addition, the Center for Cognitive and Psycho-Emotional Health implements advanced instrumental methods on unique equipment, mainly of domestic development. In particular, this is a biofeedback complex for improving the psycho-emotional state using machine learning algorithms, devices for visual color-pulse therapy and transcranial electrical stimulation, which help reduce tension, improve sleep and increase resistance to stress.

    This year, it is planned to open 10 such centers in the Federal Medical and Biological Agency system in all federal districts. Round-the-clock telemedicine communication has been established, special educational programs have been developed for each module.

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Alexander Novak took part in the board meeting of the Ministry of Economic Development

    Translartion. Region: Russians Fedetion –

    Source: Government of the Russian Federation – An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.

    Previous news Next news

    Alexander Novak took part in the board meeting of the Ministry of Economic Development

    At the meeting, the participants of the board of the Ministry of Economic Development summed up the main results of the department’s work for 2024. The priorities were identified as maintaining macroeconomic stability, mitigating risks in industries and increasing the potential for economic growth.

    “Despite the ongoing sanctions pressure from unfriendly countries, our economy has demonstrated a high degree of resilience. Moreover, it has shown unprecedented growth rates. GDP growth rates in 2024 amounted to 4.1%, over the past two years – 8.4%. They were the highest in the last decade. The achieved indicators are higher than the global average and significantly higher than the growth rates of Western economies. In nominal terms, since 2020, Russian GDP has doubled and amounted to 200 trillion rubles at the end of last year. Budget revenues were doubled, and the share of oil and gas revenues was reduced. This indicates the diversification of the Russian economy,” said Deputy Prime Minister Alexander Novak, opening the board meeting.

    Taking into account the current challenges, the work of the Government and the Ministry of Economic Development, in particular, is focused on solving three main tasks, noted Minister of Economic Development Maxim Reshetnikov in his report. “The first is ensuring macro stability. Together with the Bank of Russia and the Ministry of Finance, we are working on the interrelationship of monetary and fiscal policy,” he explained and recalled that this topic was discussed in January at a strategic session led by the Prime Minister.

    The second task is to mitigate risks in individual sectors due to the consequences of tightening monetary policy. The third block of questions is related to the growth of the economy’s potential. “We estimate the economy’s potential at 3% per year and believe that this parameter is achievable,” the minister confirmed.

    The head of the department emphasized the need for further support of investments in the regions and the development of existing support mechanisms. Thus, last year, special economic zones appeared in three regions (Rostov and Tver regions, Mordovia), and were expanded in seven. “A record 230 new residents came. There are 1,300 of them in total, which means that every fifth investor came last year,” he said.

    With the support of the State Duma Committee on Economic Policy, the criteria for creating SEZs have been updated to allow for the development of individual specializations. The entry threshold for investments in technical sovereignty projects has been lowered. The ban on residents pledging lease rights to state-owned land has been lifted so that investors can attract loans at the construction stage.

    The first stage of work on mechanisms that help build infrastructure for investors has been completed. “This year, the task is to restart them, preserving the main principle: to focus on projects that have effects for the economy. They will generate taxes, not costs,” added Maxim Reshetnikov.

    “We will continue to improve the business climate: reduce costs and barriers within the framework of the TDC [transformation of the business climate], reengineering the rules of industrial construction, regional and municipal investment standards. Now, together with the Agency for Strategic Initiatives, we are restarting the national business model,” the minister said.

    Speaking about other priorities for work in 2025, the head of the Ministry of Economic Development emphasized the importance of developing state statistics. A large-scale project has already been launched to digitalize statistics, collect information, and combine data with departmental systems. The task is to create a single digital statistics platform, take all interactions to a new level, reduce data processing time and the reporting burden on businesses, he noted.

    Another important area is the OKVED reform. A law has been passed that assumes that the OKVED code will not be what the enterprise once determined during registration, but will reflect the real economic structure of its activities. A lot of interdepartmental work is ahead to switch to the new system. “This is important for the formation of adequate statistics. On the other hand, we will receive an instrument of mass support for enterprises,” the minister said.

    “The Federation Council has developed very productive relations with the economic bloc of the Government. We meet almost weekly to discuss further measures to ensure the stability of the financial sector and various sectors of the economy,” said Deputy Chairman of the upper house of parliament Nikolai Zhuravlev.

    “There are many joint issues on the agenda of the relevant committees of the Federation Council. Among them are the implementation of the Strategy for Spatial Development of Russia, support for long-term investments, and reduction of the administrative burden on business. And of course, the key task for the Federation Council remains the work on improving the investment climate in the regions,” he added.

    Chairman of the State Duma Committee on Economic Policy Maxim Topilin, in turn, noted the importance of the extensive legislative work carried out by the Ministry of Economic Development. As an example, he cited the law on creative industries, on technology policy, and changes to the law on concessions. In addition, according to him, existing support measures need to be accumulated within a single Internet platform, similar to government services.

    “Even seven or eight years ago, government services existed, in essence, in the form of a description of certain administrative regulations. Today, most of them can be obtained electronically. For business structures, it is necessary to set the task of creating similar access to the full range of support measures, everything related to preferential regimes,” the deputy said.

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Financial news: Deposit auction of JSC “KAVKAZ.RF” will be held on 18.02.2025

    Translartion. Region: Russians Fedetion –

    Source: Moscow Exchange – Moscow Exchange –

    Parameters;

    The date of the deposit auction is 18.02.2025. The placement currency is RUB. The maximum amount of funds placed (in the placement currency) is 200,000,000.00. The placement period, days is 148. The date of depositing funds is 19.02.2025. The date of return of funds is 17.07.2025. The minimum placement interest rate, % per annum is 22.00. Terms of the conclusion, urgent or special (Urgent). The minimum amount of funds placed for one application (in the placement currency) is 200,000,000.00. The maximum number of applications from one Participant, pcs. 1. Auction form, open or closed (Open). The basis of the Agreement is the General Agreement. Schedule (Moscow time). Applications in preliminary mode from 10:00 to 10:10. Bids in competition mode from 10:10 to 10:15. Setting the cutoff percentage or declaring the auction invalid before 10:25.

    Additional terms

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    Please Note; This Information is Raw Content Directly from the Information Source. It is access to What the Source Is Stating and Does Not Reflect

    HTTPS: //VVV. MEEX.K.MO/NA77772

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Financial News: Portrait of a Cyber Fraud Victim in 2024

    Translartion. Region: Russians Fedetion –

    Source: Central Bank of Russia –

    In 2024, 34% of citizens who took part in cyber fraud encountered various typessurvey Bank of Russia. At the same time, 9% of those who contacted the criminals lost money. Based on this and other data, the regulator compiled portrait of the victim cyber fraudsters.

    As well asa year earlier, in 2024, women aged 25 to 44 with an average income and secondary education most often fell for the tricks of intruders. As a rule, these are city dwellers who should be more careful about following the rules of cybersecurity: use a strong password, do not share bank card details or codes from SMS messages with strangers. Last year, the proportion of elderly people among victims increased slightly.

    Telephone and SMS fraud, as well as fraud via messengers, still prevail. Among the most popular methods of deception is also gaining access to people’s accounts on Gosuslugi. It is noteworthy that victims usually follow the link sent by the attackers and also voluntarily transfer money to them.

    Most of the victims noted that their losses due to the actions of fraudsters did not exceed 20 thousand rubles. However, the share of large transfers increased: from 100 to 500 thousand rubles. Most of the respondents (more than 70%) lost their own savings after communicating with the attackers, and 15% of the victims gave them the credit money. The deceived began to report thefts more often: 42.8% contacted their bank, 30% – the police.

    Preview photo: fizkes / Shutterstock / Fotodom

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    Please Note; This Information is Raw Content Directly from the Information Source. It is access to What the Source Is Stating and Does Not Reflect

    HTTPS: //VVV.KBR.ru/Press/Event/? ID = 23367

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Financial news: 02/17/2025, 12:25 (Moscow time) the values of the upper limit of the price corridor and the range of market risk assessment for the VTBR (VTB JSC) security were changed.

    Translartion. Region: Russians Fedetion –

    Source: Moscow Exchange – Moscow Exchange –

    02/17/2025

    12:25

    In accordance with the Methodology for determining the risk parameters of the stock market and deposit market of Moscow Exchange PJSC by NCO NCC (JSC), on 17.02.2025, 12-25 (Moscow time), the values of the upper limit of the price corridor (up to 98.77) and the range of market risk assessment (up to 106.120812 rubles, equivalent to a rate of 21.25%) of the VTBR security (VTB JSC) were changed.

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    Please Note; This Information is Raw Content Directly from the Information Source. It is access to What the Source Is Stating and Does Not Reflect

    HTTPS: //VVV. MOEX.K.M.M.

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Financial news: 02/17/2025, 12:27 (Moscow time) the values of the upper limit of the price corridor and the range of market risk assessment for the security RU000A0ZYJ91 (FSK RS B4) were changed.

    Translartion. Region: Russians Fedetion –

    Source: Moscow Exchange – Moscow Exchange –

    02/17/2025

    12:27

    In accordance with the Methodology for determining the risk parameters of the stock market and deposit market of Moscow Exchange PJSC by NCO NCC (JSC) on 17.02.2025, 12-27 (Moscow time), the values of the upper limit of the price corridor (up to 109.37) and the range of market risk assessment (up to 1174.84 rubles, equivalent to a rate of 7.5%) of the security RU000A0ZYJ91 (FSK RS B4) were changed.

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    Please Note; This Information is Raw Content Directly from the Information Source. It is access to What the Source Is Stating and Does Not Reflect

    HTTPS: //VVV. MEEX.K.M.M.

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Financial news: 02/17/2025, 12:34 (Moscow time) the values of the upper limit of the price corridor and the range of market risk assessment for the security RU000A100YQ0 (Rosnft2P9) were changed.

    Translartion. Region: Russians Fedetion –

    Source: Moscow Exchange – Moscow Exchange –

    02/17/2025

    12:34

    In accordance with the Methodology for determining the risk parameters of the stock market and deposit market of Moscow Exchange PJSC by NCO NCC (JSC), on 17.02.2025, 12-34 (Moscow time), the values of the upper limit of the price corridor (up to 86.07) and the range of market risk assessment (up to 905.0 rubles, equivalent to a rate of 11.25%) of the RU000A100YQ0 (Rosnft2P9) security were changed.

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    Please Note; This Information is Raw Content Directly from the Information Source. It is access to What the Source Is Stating and Does Not Reflect

    HTTPS: //VVV. MOEX.K.M.M.

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Financial news: 02/17/2025, 13-24 (Moscow time) the values of the upper limit of the price corridor and the range of market risk assessment for the GMKN (GMKNorNik) security were changed.

    Translartion. Region: Russians Fedetion –

    Source: Moscow Exchange – Moscow Exchange –

    02/17/2025

    13:24

    In accordance with the Methodology for determining the risk parameters of the stock market and deposit market of Moscow Exchange PJSC by NCO NCC (JSC), on 17.02.2025, 13-24 (Moscow time), the values of the upper limit of the price corridor (up to 145.32) and the range of market risk assessment (up to 156.13 rubles, equivalent to a rate of 21.25%) of the GMKN (GMKNorNik) security were changed.

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    Please Note; This Information is Raw Content Directly from the Information Source. It is access to What the Source Is Stating and Does Not Reflect

    HTTPS: //VVV. MEEX.K.M.M.

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Financial news: 02/17/2025, 14-38 (Moscow time) the values of the upper limit of the price corridor and the range of market risk assessment for the security RU000A102K39 (RESOLizBP8) were changed.

    Translartion. Region: Russians Fedetion –

    Source: Moscow Exchange – Moscow Exchange –

    02/17/2025

    14:38

    In accordance with the Methodology for determining the risk parameters of the stock market and deposit market of Moscow Exchange PJSC by NCO NCC (JSC) on 17.02.2025, 14-38 (Moscow time), the values of the upper limit of the price corridor (up to 106.01) and the range of market risk assessment (up to 1130.55 rubles, equivalent to a rate of 6.25%) of the security RU000A102K39 (RESOLizBP8) were changed.

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    Please Note; This Information is Raw Content Directly from the Information Source. It is access to What the Source Is Stating and Does Not Reflect

    HTTPS: //VVV. MEEX.K.M.M.

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Financial News: Clarifications in the DSVD testing schedule

    Translartion. Region: Russians Fedetion –

    Source: Moscow Exchange – Moscow Exchange –

    The procedure for testing the functions of the additional weekend session, previously announced in the newsletter for developers #19, is being amended. The dates for which the reports on the results of trades are sent out and the procedure for sending them out have been clarified:

    Between 11:10 and 12:00, trading results reports for the 16th will be sent out. At 17:30, trading results reports for the 17th will be sent out. The reports will be sent to recipients on the existing mailing list.

    The news text on the website has been changed to reflect the clarifications. Link: HTTPS: //VVV. MEEX.K.M.M..

    Contact information for media 7 (495) 363-3232Pr@moex.kom

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    Please Note; This Information is Raw Content Directly from the Information Source. It is access to What the Source Is Stating and Does Not Reflect

    HTTPS: //VVV. MOEX.K.M.M.

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Financial News: Testing Extra Weekend Session

    Translartion. Region: Russians Fedetion –

    Source: Moscow Exchange – Moscow Exchange –

    We invite you to take part in testing the functionality of trading on weekends.

    We remind you that on the T1 stock market test circuit (INET_GATEWAY), testing of the additional weekend session (AWS) will be carried out on weekends from February 15, and on the T0 stock market test circuit (UAT_GATEWAY), testing of the AWS will be carried out daily from February 18, 2025.

    The schedule of test stand operation is published on the Exchange website: HTTPS: //VVV. MEEX.K.M.M..

    On February 15 and 16, the T1 test circuit successfully tested the additional weekend session. Today, February 17, the T1 circuit is holding a trading day after the DSVD. The T1 test circuit schedule for the coming days:

    02/17 Trading day on Monday after the DSVD
    18.02 Settlements based on the results of the DSVD, standard trading day
    19.02 – 21.02 Standard trading and settlement days
    02.22 – 23.02 Re-testing of the DSVD
    24.02 Trading day on Monday after the DSVD
    02.25 Settlements based on the results of the DSVD, standard trading day
    26.02 – 28.02 Standard trading and settlement days

    Contact information for media 7 (495) 363-3232Pr@moex.kom

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    Please Note; This Information is Raw Content Directly from the Information Source. It is access to What the Source Is Stating and Does Not Reflect

    HTTPS: //VVV. MOEX.K.M.M.

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Financial news: 02/17/2025, 15-27 (Moscow time) the values of the upper limit of the price corridor and the range of market risk assessment for the security RU000A103TA8 (SiburHBO10) were changed.

    Translartion. Region: Russians Fedetion –

    Source: Moscow Exchange – Moscow Exchange –

    02/17/2025

    15:27

    In accordance with the Methodology for determining the risk parameters of the stock market and deposit market of Moscow Exchange PJSC by NCO NCC (JSC) on 17.02.2025, 15-27 (Moscow time), the values of the upper limit of the price corridor (up to 85.83) and the range of market risk assessment (up to 85977.65 rubles, equivalent to a rate of 30.0%) of the security RU000A103TA8 (SiburHBO10) were changed.

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    Please Note; This Information is Raw Content Directly from the Information Source. It is access to What the Source Is Stating and Does Not Reflect

    HTTPS: //VVV. MEEX.K.M.M.

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Congratulations on the Day of Russian Student Teams

    Translartion. Region: Russians Fedetion –

    Source: State University of Management – Official website of the State –

    This year marks the 66th anniversary of the Russian student brigade movement. And 10 years ago, by Decree of the President of Russia Vladimir Putin, an official holiday was established for the participants of student brigade groups.

    The spring of 1959 is considered to be the time when the detachments emerged, when a group of 339 students from the Lomonosov Moscow State University went to work on a construction site in the North Kazakhstan region, where virgin lands were being developed at the time. However, this date is also very conditional, since university students had been involved in agricultural work, large construction projects, and laying railways since 1920.

    In the summer of 1962, the commanders of student detachments from leading Moscow universities wrote a collective letter to the General Secretary of the CPSU Central Committee Nikita Khrushchev asking him to support their movement. He gave the go-ahead, and on November 15, 1963, the first All-Union Rally of the VSSO took place in the Kremlin Palace of Congresses, where a single Charter for all student detachments was adopted.

    Since then, the movement has acquired a truly grand scale. Student brigades participated in the development of virgin lands, the development of gas fields in Tyumen, the construction of the BAM, the Moscow metro, the VAZ and KAMAZ plants, the Sayano-Shushenskaya hydroelectric power station and other large facilities. Thanks to their activities, many settlements were founded, including the cities of Bratsk and Ust-Ilimsk. Over the years of the movement’s existence, tens of millions of students passed through it. The apogee was reached in 1982, when the one-time number of construction brigade fighters reached almost 550 thousand people.

    During their student years, the current President of Russia Vladimir Putin, the Minister of Foreign Affairs Sergey Lavrov, the Chairperson of the Federation Council Valentina Matviyenko and many other famous people had the opportunity to work in construction teams.

    Of course, this movement did not pass by the State University of Management, which in the heyday of student brigades was called the Moscow Engineering and Economic Institute. The modern campus of the university was built with the most active participation of its students. Among them were the current professor of the Department of Information Systems Vladimir Godin, professor of the Department of Project Management Alexey Lyalin, deputy chairman of the primary trade union organization of GUU employees Nikolay Nesterov, professor of the Department of Management Theory of the Institute of Public Administration and Law Alexander Raichenko and others. We talked with the latter about the history of student brigades at GUU.

    Alexander Vasilyevich, please tell us how the student work brigade movement began at our State University of Management and about your experience in them.

    — It all started for us much earlier than I started participating in it. I first came to the construction team in August 1968, after I was enrolled as a first-year student. That year, we were sent to prepare the construction site of the university complex in the garden near the metro station, which is now called Vykhino. In addition, we already had construction teams in the Moscow region and teams that were engaged in harvesting agricultural products on state farms in the Moscow and Astrakhan regions. Then, starting in 1969, we began very large-scale construction of our complex.

    Every year, 300 to 700 students worked here – this was our main construction site. Some worked not only in the summer months. In connection with this, their curriculum was redrawn, but they completed it in full. The next most important detachment was the agricultural harvesting detachment of approximately 600 people, who went to work in the Astrakhan region almost every year from 1969 to 1981.

    Where else in the country, besides Astrakhan, did our detachments work? After all, the movement is known for its all-Union construction projects.

    — Large construction teams worked in Siberia. Every year, two or three teams worked on the construction of the first line of the Baikal-Amur Mainline. We worked on the construction of the Khrebtovaya-Ust-Ilimsk branch, the settlement of Igirma. 120 of our students worked there for two years. And some time later, we worked for another two years in the settlement of Zvezdny, also on the BAM. We also had teams in the Gorno-Altai Region. In 1969, there were about eight teams there, from each faculty. And in the Uzhur District of the Krasnoyarsk Territory, in the settlement of Shchetinkino, they were building a large residential complex. There were also some rather exotic places to work. One of the teams worked on industrial and civil construction in the settlement of Mirny, in Yakutia, the diamond capital of Russia. This was an unexpected appointment for us, but our students showed themselves well there.

    What practical benefits did these works provide to students?

    — The experience that students gained in construction teams was very helpful. I know more than 30 current managers who gained their first experience in production activities in student teams. Today they hold respectable positions, from the head of the construction and installation department to the governor of the region.

    And who from the current faculty of the State University of Management used to work in construction teams?

    — I know more than 20 people working at the university today who had such experience. The thing is that this work was considered as industrial practice. Rector of MIEI Olimpiada Vasilyevna Kozlova defined this activity as the first immersive industrial practice. It was not industry-specific, but it provided real and useful experience. Almost 100% of students, with the exception of those who could not participate in the work due to physical condition, were involved in one or another detachment. And the most active did this throughout the entire period of study. That is, every year, starting in May, when our quartermasters left, and ending in October, when the final results were summed up and we settled accounts with our customers, they actively participated in this work.

    We have an archive photo of MIE students in Czechoslovakia. Did our guys go anywhere else abroad?

    — What you are talking about was an interesting practice, it was called “currency-free exchange”. Student teams from our university were sent to four countries: the German Democratic Republic, Czechoslovakia (Charles University was a major partner of ours), Bulgaria (we had strong and long-term ties with it, our teams went there almost every year), and there were also ties with the Polish People’s Republic, although to a lesser extent. The same number of students from the universities with which we cooperated came from these countries. They worked for us, as a rule, on the construction of buildings for our university. Our students abroad worked at various sites, on construction sites of the national economy and the like.

    Today, RSO is 400 thousand young people from 85 regions of Russia who cooperate with more than 1000 employers, including Russian Railways, Rosatom, Gazprom, EkoNiva, Artek and other large organizations. Thus, students not only gain practical skills in professional activities, but also help solve important economic problems, form the country’s personnel reserve.

    “This is a unique school of life that shapes not only professional and personal qualities, but also the desire to live and develop in the native country. We are proud that the guys are becoming part of a big cause – strengthening the economy and social sphere of Russia. The contribution of the student brigades is an investment in the future of our country,” said the head of the Federal Agency for Youth Affairs (Rosmolodezh), associate professor of the Department of State and Municipal Administration of the State University of Management Grigory Gurov.

    Let us recall that at the end of last year, the State University of Management signed a cooperation agreement with the RSO and this spring will begin active joint work in the area of pedagogical and educational activities, as well as the work of service departments.

    We congratulate everyone involved in the movement on the holiday! We wish you success in work and study, as well as a lot of pleasant impressions from business trips and communication with new acquaintances.

    Subscribe to the TG channel “Our GUU” Date of publication: 02/17/2025

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Financial news: 02/17/2025, 10-15 (Moscow time) the values of the upper limit of the price corridor and the range of market risk assessment for the FLOT (Sovcomflot) security were changed.

    Translartion. Region: Russians Fedetion –

    Source: Moscow Exchange – Moscow Exchange –

    02/17/2025

    10:15

    In accordance with the Methodology for determining the risk parameters of the stock market and deposit market of Moscow Exchange PJSC by NCO NCC (JSC), on 17.02.2025, 10-15 (Moscow time), the values of the upper limit of the price corridor (up to 110.65) and the range of market risk assessment (up to 118,884 rubles, equivalent to a rate of 21.25%) of the FLOT (Sovcomflot) security were changed.

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    Please Note; This Information is Raw Content Directly from the Information Source. It is access to What the Source Is Stating and Does Not Reflect

    HTTPS: //VVV. MOEX.K.Mom/N77742

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Financial news: 02/17/2025, 10:26 (Moscow time) the values of the upper limit of the price corridor and the range of market risk assessment for the security RU000A103TC4 (SiburHBO11) were changed.

    Translartion. Region: Russians Fedetion –

    Source: Moscow Exchange – Moscow Exchange –

    02/17/2025

    10:26

    In accordance with the Methodology for determining the risk parameters of the stock market and deposit market of Moscow Exchange PJSC by NCO NCC (JSC), on 17.02.2025, 10-26 (Moscow time), the values of the upper limit of the price corridor (up to 72.77) and the range of market risk assessment (up to 73232.47 rubles, equivalent to a rate of 31.25%) of the security RU000A103TC4 (SiburHBO11) were changed.

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    Please Note; This Information is Raw Content Directly from the Information Source. It is access to What the Source Is Stating and Does Not Reflect

    HTTPS: //VVV. MEEX.K.M.M.

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Financial news: 02/17/2025, 10:52 (Moscow time) the values of the upper limit of the price corridor and the range of market risk assessment for security RU000A107936 (RZhD 1P-29R) were changed.

    Translartion. Region: Russians Fedetion –

    Source: Moscow Exchange – Moscow Exchange –

    02/17/2025

    10:52

    In accordance with the Methodology for determining the risk parameters of the stock market and deposit market of Moscow Exchange PJSC by NCO NCC (JSC) on 17.02.2025, 10-52 (Moscow time), the values of the upper limit of the price corridor (up to 120.29) and the range of market risk assessment (up to 1328.67 rubles, equivalent to a rate of 21.25%) of the security RU000A107936 (RZhD 1P-29R) were changed.

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    Please Note; This Information is Raw Content Directly from the Information Source. It is access to What the Source Is Stating and Does Not Reflect

    HTTPS: //VVV. MOEX.K.MO/N77746

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Financial news: 02/17/2025 deposit auction of UK FRT LLC will take place

    Translartion. Region: Russians Fedetion –

    Source: Moscow Exchange – Moscow Exchange –

    Parameters;

    The date of the deposit auction is 17.02.2025. The placement currency is RUB. The maximum amount of funds placed (in the placement currency) is 485,000,000.00. The placement period, days is 15. The date of depositing funds is 18.02.2025. The date of return of funds is 05.03.2025. The minimum placement interest rate, % per annum is 21.00. Terms of the conclusion, urgent or special (Urgent). The minimum amount of funds placed for one application (in the placement currency) is 485,000,000.00. The maximum number of applications from one Participant, pcs. 1. Auction form, open or closed (Open). The basis of the Agreement is the General Agreement. Schedule (Moscow time). Applications in preliminary mode from 12:30 to 12:40. Applications in competition mode from 12:40 to 12:45. Setting the cut-off percentage or declaring the auction invalid before 12:55.

    Additional terms

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    Please Note; This Information is Raw Content Directly from the Information Source. It is access to What the Source Is Stating and Does Not Reflect

    HTTPS: //VVV. MEEX.K.M.M.

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI Global: What does the US public think about sending troops to foreign wars? Here’s what the evidence shows

    Source: The Conversation – UK – By Dafydd Townley, Teaching Fellow in International Security, University of Portsmouth

    The US public’s commitment to sending its sons and daughters to war has declined in recent years. Polls suggest that US involvement in modern conflicts is more likely to be viewed as mistaken than in the early and middle parts of the 20th century. Today, around 47% of Americans consider the Iraq war a mistake, and 43% feel the same about the war in Afghanistan.

    Recent announcements by the US president, Donald Trump, about the possibility of using US forces as part of his Gaza strategy is unlikely to improve those figures.

    On February 4, Trump proposed that the US effectively take control of the Gaza Strip and rebuild the area into what he has called the riviera of the Middle East.

    When he was asked at a press conference whether he would be willing to use US troops to secure the region, Trump answered that “as far as Gaza is concerned, we’ll do what is necessary. If it’s necessary, we’ll do that. We’re going to take over that piece that we’re going to develop it”.

    Trump walked back on that initial claim of the use of military personnel just days later, stating that the US military force would be unnecessary. “The Gaza Strip would be turned over to the United States by Israel at the conclusion of fighting,” adding that “No soldiers by the U.S. would be needed! Stability for the region would reign!” But others have suggested a US military presence would have to be involved.

    Putting US troops on the ground would fly in the face of current American public opinion. In a survey taken on February 12, only a quarter of those polled supported the prospect of US troops being sent to the region, and just over half (52%) of Republicans disapproved of the plan.

    Less than 25% of Americans supported the US taking ownership of the Gaza Strip, while 62% showed opposition to it. Less than half (46%) of Republican voters polled expressed support while only 10% of Democrats showed any kind of enthusiasm for the initiative, according to the poll.

    Of those polled, the majority said they opposed all of Trump’s plans to expand US-controlled territory, whether that was the Panama Canal, Greenland, Canada, or Gaza.

    The lack of support from the US public in deploying troops overseas has been constant since the withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2021 – and the American public appears to be questioning US military involvement in world affairs more generally.

    In a poll taken by foreign policy thinktank Defense Priorities in February 2024, 56% of respondents were “very worried” or “somewhat worried” that the presence of US troops in Syria could escalate into a broader conflict in the region. Of those that opposed a US military presence in Syria, 66% felt that it was a waste of resources.

    And just last September, a Pew Research Center poll revealed that 75% of those polled were worried about the Israel-Hamas conflict expanding in the region and US troops becoming more directly involved.

    Recruitment ad for the US Marines.

    This lack of public support for US military involvement abroad, as well as the poor recent record of recruitment into the military, may be informing Trump’s negotiations in both Gaza, and over the Ukraine war.




    Read more:
    US kicks off debate on conscription as other Nato members introduce drafts


    While the US public shows high levels of respect for those who serve in the military, around 80% of American teenagers are not interested in military service, while 55% of adults and 67% of parents are not likely to recommend it as a career to teenagers.

    The US has tried numerous recent initiatives, including offering substantial bonuses to entice recruits to join up, but without much success. The army, navy and air force all failed to reach their target recruitment numbers in 2023.

    This week Trump opened early discussions with Vladimir Putin, and latterly Kyiv, over proposals for a Ukraine peace deal. In a meeting with European defense ministers in Brussels on February 12, the new US defense secretary Pete Hegseth ruled out the participation of US troops in any peacekeeping mission in Ukraine, although in an interview with the Wall Street Journal on February 13 vice-president JD Vance did not rule out using the military.

    Hegseth also said that the US was planning to pull back from its role in European security, sparking high levels of concern from many European leaders.

    Some Republican senators have not been particularly supportive of Trump’s Ukraine proposals, especially those that have backed Ukraine over the last three years.

    In an interview, Senate armed services chair, Roger Wicker, said that “there are good guys and bad guys in this war, and the Russians are the bad guys. They invaded, contrary to almost every international law, and they should be defeated. And Ukraine is entitled to the promises that the world made to it.” Republican Senator Mike Rounds joined Wicker in demanding that: “Russia be recognised for the aggressor that they are.”

    There’s a similar level of concern on Trump’s Gaza plan – even from Trump’s close allies in the party. Rand Paul, the libertarian senator for Kentucky, suggested this idea flew in the face of Trump’s foreign policy proposals espoused during the campaign.

    “I thought we voted for America First. We have no business contemplating yet another occupation to doom our treasure and spill our soldiers’ blood,” he wrote on X.

    It is unlikely that the majority of Republican voters would be supportive of Trump’s Gaza initiative (or sending troops to Ukraine). This is partly because of the demands that it would make on the federal government – but also because of the necessity of using armed forces to implement it.

    Trump’s recent controversial executive orders have barely damaged his early job approval ratings. But the deployment of armed forces to Gaza or Ukraine runs counter to a long-term significant decline in public support for US overseas military intervention and that might be a step too far for many voters.

    Dafydd Townley does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. What does the US public think about sending troops to foreign wars? Here’s what the evidence shows – https://theconversation.com/what-does-the-us-public-think-about-sending-troops-to-foreign-wars-heres-what-the-evidence-shows-249419

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Speech: Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s article in the Telegraph: 17 February 2025

    Source: United Kingdom – Prime Minister’s Office 10 Downing Street

    Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s article in the Telegraph on Ukraine.

    We are facing a once-in-a-generation moment for the collective security of our continent. This is not only a question about the future of Ukraine – it is existential for Europe as a whole.

    Securing a lasting peace in Ukraine that safeguards its sovereignty for the long term is essential if we are to deter Putin from further aggression in the future.

    To achieve it, Europe and the United States must continue to work closely together – and I believe the UK can play a unique role in helping to make this happen, just as we did this past week in stepping in to convene and chair the Ukraine Defence Contact Group.

    First, Europe must step up further to meet the demands of its own security. So I am heading to Paris with a very clear message for our European friends. We have got to show we are truly serious about our own defence and bearing our own burden. We have talked about it for too long – and president Trump is right to demand that we get on with it.

    As European nations, we must increase our defence spending and take on a greater role in Nato. Non-US Nato nations have already increased defence spending by 20 per cent in the past year, but we must go further.

    Russia is still waging war and Ukraine is still fighting for its freedom, which is why we must not relent in our efforts to get the kit Ukrainians need for their fighters on the front line. While the fighting continues, we must put Ukraine in the strongest possible position ahead of any talks.

    The UK is ready to play a leading role in accelerating work on security guarantees for Ukraine. This includes further support for Ukraine’s military, where the UK has already committed £3 billion a year until at least 2030. But it also means being ready and willing to contribute to security guarantees to Ukraine by putting our own troops on the ground if necessary.

    I do not say that lightly. I feel very deeply the responsibility that comes with potentially putting British servicemen and women in harm’s way. But any role in helping to guarantee Ukraine’s security is helping to guarantee the security of our continent, and the security of this country.

    The end of this war, when it comes, cannot merely become a temporary pause before Putin attacks again.

    But second, while European nations must step up in this moment – and we will – US support will remain critical and a US security guarantee is essential for a lasting peace, because only the US can deter Putin from attacking again. So I will be meeting president Trump in the coming days and working with him and all our G7 partners to help secure the strong deal we need.

    We must be clear that peace cannot come at any cost. Ukraine must be at the table in these negotiations, because anything less would accept Putin’s position that Ukraine is not a real nation.

    President Zelensky and the Ukrainian people have shown the most extraordinary resilience and made such great sacrifices in the defence of their nation. We cannot have another situation like Afghanistan, where the US negotiated directly with the Taliban and cut out the Afghan government. I feel sure that president Trump will want to avoid this too.

    While Nato membership may take time, we should continue to support Ukraine’s irreversible path to joining the alliance.

    We should also show greater strength in applying economic pressure. Putin’s economy is feeling the strain – he is worried about his energy revenues and his financial sector.

    Working together, the US, Europe and all our G7 allies should seek to go further on the oil price cap, the Shadow Fleet, the sanctioning of oil giants, and going after those banks that are enabling the evasion of sanctions.

    These crucial days ahead will determine the future security of our continent. As I will say in Paris, peace comes through strength. But the reverse is also true. Weakness leads to war.

    This is the moment for us all to step up, and the UK will do so because it is the right thing to do for the values and freedoms we hold dear, and because it is fundamental to our own national security.

    Updates to this page

    Published 17 February 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom