Category: Transport

  • MIL-OSI China: China remains appealing to foreign investors

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    SHANGHAI, Feb. 12 — Despite geopolitical tensions and rising trade protectionism, international businesses are deepening their commitments in China as 2025 unfolds, demonstrating the country’s appeal to those seeking to stay competitive globally.

    U.S. automaker Tesla’s Megafactory in Shanghai began producing energy storage batteries on Tuesday. Earlier this month, Toyota announced plans to establish a wholly owned electric vehicle plant in the eastern Chinese economic hub. In January, construction started on Siemens Healthineers’ new manufacturing and research facility in south China’s Shenzhen.

    The rationale behind these investments by global industry leaders is clear: China remains a vital market with significant growth potential.

    With its expanding middle class, China’s position as a global economic powerhouse makes its vast market hard to ignore. In 2024, the country’s gross domestic product (GDP) reached a record 134.91 trillion yuan (about 18.81 trillion U.S. dollars), marking a 5-percent year-on-year increase. As the world’s second-largest economy, China offers opportunities that are difficult to find elsewhere.

    China’s supply chain has become increasingly sophisticated and complete. Its highly competitive and advanced manufacturing ecosystem continues to attract high-value, technology-intensive investments.

    Additionally, China’s talent pool, particularly its abundance of engineers, bolsters multinational corporations’ confidence in establishing global research and development centers here. The country’s transformation into an innovation hub is particularly evident in industries such as electric vehicles and lithium-ion batteries. As China builds a modern industrial system, it accelerates efforts to develop new quality productive forces, creating fresh opportunities for global companies.

    China remains committed to opening up and fostering win-win cooperation. The nation’s market has become increasingly accessible, and a series of measures have been taken to encourage foreign investment. In recent years, China has made significant strides in promoting high-standard openness, including reducing the negative list for foreign investment, eliminating all restrictions on foreign investors in manufacturing, and expanding unilateral opening to the least-developed countries. The results of these efforts are reflected in the 9.9-percent increase in the number of newly established foreign-funded enterprises in China last year.

    Furthermore, Chinese authorities have made expanding high-standard economic openness a key priority for 2025. During an executive meeting on Monday, the State Council approved an action plan to stabilize foreign investment this year. The meeting called for more practical and effective measures to attract foreign capital, underscoring China’s commitment to creating a business-friendly environment.

    Despite challenges posed by the politicization of economic and trade issues in the West and sluggish global investment, China’s high-level openness, economic vitality, and expanding consumer base continue to make it a top investment destination.

    According to the 2024 Kearney Foreign Direct Investment Confidence Index, which measures investor expectations for FDI over the next three years, China jumped from seventh to third place in global rankings, leading all emerging markets.

    As many multinational executives have noted, “The next China is still China.” In an era of uncertainty and instability, one thing remains clear: Investing in China is a strategic move for those looking to secure their future.

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Attorney General James Releases Footage from Investigation into Death of Vilmond Jean-Baptiste

    Source: US State of New York

    NEW YORK – New York Attorney General Letitia James today released police body-worn camera footage that her office obtained as part of its ongoing investigation into the death of Vilmond Jean-Baptiste, who died on September 13, 2024 following an encounter with members of the New York City Police Department (NYPD) in Brooklyn.

    At approximately 5:21 p.m. on September 13, members of the NYPD’s Brooklyn South Warrant Squad entered an apartment to serve a warrant. When officers encountered Mr. Jean-Baptiste in the apartment, he was allegedly holding a knife. Officers instructed Mr. Jean-Baptiste to drop the knife, but Mr. Jean-Baptiste allegedly failed to do so and instead approached the officers with the knife. One officer discharged his taser and three officers discharged their service weapons, striking Mr. Jean-Baptiste. Mr. Jean-Baptiste was transported to a local hospital where he was pronounced dead.

    The Office of Special Investigation (OSI) of the Attorney General’s Office released footage from body-worn cameras that officers were equipped with during the incident. The release of this footage follows Attorney General James’ directive that camera footage obtained by her office during an OSI investigation be released to the public to increase transparency and strengthen public trust in these matters.

    Pursuant to New York State Executive Law Section 70-b, OSI assesses every incident reported to it where a police officer or a peace officer, including a corrections officer, may have caused the death of a person by an act or omission. Under the law, the officer may be on-duty or off-duty, and the decedent may be armed or unarmed. Also, the decedent may or may not be in custody or incarcerated. If OSI’s assessment indicates an officer may have caused the death, OSI proceeds to conduct a full investigation of the incident.

    The release of this footage is not an expression of any opinion as to the guilt or innocence of any party in a criminal matter or any opinion as to how or whether any individual may be charged with a crime. 

    Warning: These videos contain content that viewers may find disturbing. 

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Fossil fuel anti-protest bills in Montana, Virginia, and Illinois threaten free speech and climate advocacy

    Source: Greenpeace Statement –

    © Tim Aubry / Greenpeace

    Already this year, lawmakers in Montana, Virginia, and Illinois have introduced bills that would hand corporations and prosecutors new tools to suppress climate activism. 

    Although proponents frame these bills as public safety measures, there is no evidence that they improve energy reliability or make communities safer. To the contrary, they contain intentionally broad provisions that would make climate advocates, environmental defenders, and landowners vulnerable to felony prosecution for infractions that are historically linked to protest. 

    In light of Big Oil’s death drive to keep the world hooked on fossil fuels (now with the federal government’s total support), policies that take aim at our right to protest make all of us less safe by undermining the urgent action that is needed to preserve a livable future.

    Twenty-three states already have some form of these laws in place.1 Certain components of them pose an obvious threat to climate protest (for example, boosting penalties for simple trespass near fossil fuel infrastructure), but no less dangerous are vague provisions that target “impeding” fossil fuel infrastructure or “causing damages.”

    Under some laws, it is unclear whether these provisions could be used to impose draconian penalties upon individuals engaged in peaceful sit-ins or symbolic protest actions such as painting a slogan on a pipeline without damaging its functionality. In recent years, oil and gas companies have sought large monetary damages from activists for alleged costs associated with project delays.2 Moreover, fossil fuel spokespeople and their allies in government routinely frame acts of civil disobedience as violent attacks deserving of deterrence and aggressive retaliation.

    Laws with intentionally broad language allow authorities to hang the threat of prosecution over activists’ heads, even if the most extreme charges are not pursued or eventually dropped. Further, they can force individuals and organizations into costly legal battles.

    A closer look at the new crop of anti-protest bills below:

    • Montana HB 257 would build on the state’s existing anti-protest law by removing the condition that sites classified as “critical infrastructure” be enclosed by a fence or identified by signage. The bill drew support from business groups representing ExxonMobil, Continental Resources, the American Chemistry Council, and other members in a January 27 committee hearing.
    • Virginia HB 2215 would make “damaging” certain facilities and equipment a class 3 felony, punishable by 5-20 years in prison. The primary sponsor, VA Rep. Terry Kilgore, is a long-time member of the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) and has accepted more than $380,000 in campaign donations from Dominion Energy over his political career. ALEC, an organization that invites corporate lobbyists to help draft model bills that are promoted with state officials around the country, has played a key role in the spread of anti-protest laws since 2016. Dominion Energy has also lobbied for anti-protest laws, including to explicitly “address civil disobedience towards pipelines,” according to emails obtained by public records request.
    • Illinois HB 1480 would create a new felony offense that could cover nonviolent protesters at pipeline and other infrastructure sites with maximum penalties of 3–7 years imprisonment and a $20,000 fine. It would also extend liability to anyone who “conspires with” a person to commit the offense. This last provision is especially pernicious due to the history of prosecutors using scattershot conspiracy allegations to target individuals and organizations with shared political views absent evidence of specific crimes. IL Rep. Patrick Windhorst, the primary sponsor of this bill, is also a member of ALEC.

    For more information about these anti-protest bills and related lobbying activity, see here.

    Related to the push for fossil fuel anti-protest laws are strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs). Greenpeace is facing a costly SLAPP brought by Energy Transfer, the owner of the Dakota Access Pipeline, in North Dakota state court, which goes to trial this month. Further, California Attorney General Rob Banta, the Sierra Club and other environmental groups were sued for defamation by ExxonMobil this January after the defendants sought to hold Exxon legally accountable for its role in the plastics crisis.


     1Twenty-two states were counted for Greenpeace USA’s Dollars vs. Democracy 2023 report. The twenty-third state to pass a fossil fuel anti-protest law was Florida with H 275 / S 340 (2024).

    2 For example, see Mountain Valley Pipeline’s lawsuit against climate protesters. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/sep/27/mountain-valley-pipeline-protest 

     3 For more about this, see “The Fossil Fuel Industry Used ALEC to Spread Fossil Fuel Anti-Protest Laws Across the Country” on page 30 of Dollars vs. Democracy 2023.

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI Security: KS25: USAF, JSDF conduct C-17 static loading test

    Source: United States INDO PACIFIC COMMAND

    Approximately 60 members from the Japan Ground Self-Defense Force, Japan Air Self-Defense Force and U.S. Air Force conducted a C-17 Globemaster III static loading test at Naval Air Facility Atsugi, Japan Feb. 3-4.

    The training event was a part of Keen Sword 25, a bilateral training exercise that took place in the vicinity of Japan from Oct. 23, 2024, through Nov. 1, 2024.

    Keen Sword demonstrates and advances interoperability, validates force posture, and reinforces solidarity of the U.S.-Japan alliance by exercising the most modern
    equipment and procedures under realistic conditions.

    “AC-17 loading test was postponed during KS 25,” said Jake Carrico, U.S. Forces, Japan transportation planning specialist. “Japan Self-Defense Forces requested the training event be rescheduled for February 2025 to meet this training exercise objective.”

    The training included a joint inspection, load planning, and a C-17 static loading test with Japan Self-Defense Forces members from the 1st Helicopter Brigade, and Japan Air Self-Defense Force Central Air Defense Missile Group. Also, USAF members from 730th Air Mobility Squadron and 374th Logistics Readiness Squadron, Yokota Air Base, and 535th Airlift Squadron, Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Hawaii.

    “This is important bilateral training event provides JGSDF and JASDF members to practice contingency-loading of their equipment on a USAF C-17,” said Carrico.

    During the two-day training event, JGSDF members conducted their CH-47JA Chinook helicopter loading onto a USAF C-17. Also, JASDF members loaded their Antenna Mast Group vehicle and MIM-104 Patriot missile system, including USAF loading members conducted joint inspections and load planning according to the Air Transportation Test Loading Activity (ATTLA).

    “The ATTLA provides instructions on how to prepare and transport equipment, including foreign nations, on USAF aircraft.” said Staff Sgt. Eric Shaah, 730th Air Mobility Squadron air transportation specialist. “We inspected cargo for airworthiness to include hazardous materials check, cargo build up, and proper vehicle transport configurations.”

    The two-day exercise offered the opportunity to liaise with the JSDF in a show of bilateral interoperability and to use the safest and most efficient methods to upload and download their assets using U.S. airlift.

    “In total 143,000 pounds of rolling stock were prepared, loaded, and unloaded from a C-17.” said Shaah.

    According to a senior JASDF official, using the C-17 cargo aircraft enables a strategic capability to reconfigure large assets like the CH-47 Chinook transport helicopter for airlift around the country.

    “Exercising the capability to support and collaborate with our partner nations strengthens our ability to project combat power anywhere on the globe,” said Shaah, “During these two days, we were able to demonstrate the joint inspection requirements to the JASDF and JGSDF so that they have familiarization with the mathematical computations and loading process in the event that they need to deploy their equipment and personnel via mobility airlift.”

    This training provides an enhanced mutual understanding of aircraft loading procedures and strengthens cooperation between USAF and the JSDF to respond to humanitarian crisis or contingency. The U.S.-Japan alliance has served as the foundation for regional peace and security for nearly 75 years and remains indispensable to our mutual security interests in the Indo-Pacific.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI: Community Hospital Corporation and CarePilot Forge Strategic Partnership Following Successful Pilot of Ambient AI Technology

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    KANSAS CITY, Mo. and PLANO, Texas, Feb. 12, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — CarePilot, a leader in AI-driven medical documentation for community healthcare, today announced a new strategic partnership with Plano, TX based Community Hospital Corporation (CHC) following a successful pilot of CarePilot’s ambient AI technology in several CHC facilities. Under this partnership, CHC plans to deploy and distribute CarePilot’s AI scribe solution across their managed and affiliated hospitals nationwide.

    • CarePilot’s ambient AI technology transforms spoken clinical conversations into comprehensive, structured documentation, enabling clinicians to focus on delivering patient care rather than on administrative tasks. This partnership is expected to streamline clinical workflows and ultimately enhance the patient experience throughout CHC’s extensive network.

    “We’re excited to work with CarePilot to bring AI to community health care and improve the experience for our patients and providers,” said Joe Ford, Regional Vice President of Information Technology at CHC.

    CHC is renowned for its support of community-based hospitals nationwide. The organization is either directly responsible for or supports the day-to-day operations of 23 hospitals across the country.  Additionally, CHC Consulting, CHC IT management, Telecom and Supply chain programs extend its influence to over 200 network hospitals. This broad reach positions CHC as a pivotal force in enhancing community health care delivery across diverse regions. By integrating CarePilot’s AI solution, the partnership aims to reduce administrative burdens on clinicians, optimize clinical documentation, and foster more meaningful interactions between healthcare providers and their patients.

    “We’re committed to bringing cutting-edge technology to rural and community hospitals. Our collaboration with CarePilot and their ambient AI platform is a testament to that commitment. By automating documentation in ambulatory, ED, and inpatient settings, and ensuring seamless compatibility with various EHRs, we’re not only improving operational efficiency, but also making this advanced technology accessible to our dedicated healthcare professionals, ultimately driving better patient outcomes in the communities we serve.”

    About CarePilot
    CarePilot is at the forefront of AI-driven documentation solutions for community healthcare. Its cutting-edge AI scribe technology converts clinical conversations into detailed clinical notes, reducing the administrative burden on providers and allowing them to focus on what truly matters—patient care. Designed for seamless integration into existing clinical workflows, CarePilot’s solution is transforming the landscape of clinical documentation across community health settings.

    About CHC Community Hospital Corporation
    Community Hospital Corporation owns, manages and consults with hospitals through CHC Hospitals, CHC Consulting and CHC ContinueCARE with the purpose to collaborate with partners and bring innovative solutions to support the vibrancy and accessibility of community healthcare. Based in Plano, Texas, CHC provides the resources and experience community hospitals need to improve quality outcomes, patient satisfaction and financial performance.

    For more information, please visit www.carepilot.com or www.chc.com.

    CONTACT:
    Joseph Tutera, CEO
    sales@carepilot.com
    6550 Sprint Parkway
    Suite 200
    Overland Park, Kansas, 66211, USA

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI USA: Warren, Markey Slam Trump Administration for Causing “Chaos and Upheaval” at Massachusetts Research Institutions, Demand Answers from NIH and NSF

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Massachusetts – Elizabeth Warren
    February 12, 2025
    “Trump Administration actions are endangering life-saving research and economic growth in Massachusetts and across the country.”
    “The chaos caused by the Trump administration is unacceptable—and you owe researchers and patients in Massachusetts and beyond an explanation about what is going on at your agencies.” 
    Text of Letter (PDF) 
    Washington, D.C. – U.S. Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.) wrote to the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the National Science Foundation (NSF) with concerns about the ongoing Trump Administration funding cuts at Massachusetts research institutions. 
    The NIH and NSF are the largest public funders of research in the United States — fueling the development of lifesaving treatments for diseases like cancer, heart disease, and diabetes, tools for the early detection of Alzheimer’s disease, and more. This funding is particularly indispensable in Massachusetts, where dozens of world-renowned universities, hospitals, and research institutions rely on NIH and NSF grants to support cutting-edge research that benefits the U.S. economy and patients around the world.
    Within days of taking office, the Trump Administration called for an immediate pause on all public communications from HHS, NIH’s parent organization, and one week later, paused all activities related to the disbursement of funds. This pause was blocked by a federal judge, but the Trump administration has refused to fully comply with the order to unfreeze funds. 
    On February 7, the NIH announced that all new and existing research awards would face major cuts, due to reduction in the “indirect cost rate.” Following a legal challenge by 22 state attorneys general, led by Massachusetts Attorney General Campbell, a federal judge issued a temporary order blocking the cut within those states. Still, researchers, students, and institutions are facing huge budget cuts and continued uncertainty.
    These “Trump Administration actions are endangering life-saving research and economic growth in Massachusetts and across the country,” wrote the lawmakers. 
    “The chaos caused by the Trump administration is unacceptable—and you owe researchers and patients in Massachusetts and beyond an explanation about what is going on at your agencies,” continued the lawmakers.
    The Senators’ offices conducted interviews with institutions who are among the top recipients of NIH and NSF funding in Massachusetts about the impact these cuts would have on researchers’ projects, careers, and on the local economy. These interviews revealed that: 
    The funding freezes and cuts at NIH and NSF have caused chaos and confusion at Massachusetts research institutions. Representatives at Massachusetts research institutions described a “hunger for clear guidance on what is impacted and what isn’t” as investigators scramble to save their work and plan for the years and months ahead. They are concerned about existing grants being clawed back, afraid to ask for clarification for fear they’ll have a “target on their back,” and in some instances even unable to “buy a book or a pencil.” 
    The funding cut offs are impeding research carried out by Massachusetts institutions that enable critical, lifesaving care. NIH and NSF funding saves Americans’ lives by sponsoring life-saving clinical trials, many of which are conducted at Massachusetts institutions. Thus, for some, the consequences of the funding pauses could be life or death: “if you’re a cancer patient in a clinical trial, it is not a theoretical undertaking, it is treatment.”
    Federal funding disruptions at Massachusetts institutions puts the future of a highly skilled STEM workforce at risk.Nearly half of all science and engineering doctoral recipients graduating from U.S. research institutions have received federal research funding during their graduate studies. According to conversations with Massachusetts research institution representatives, “higher education is a big industry in Massachusetts, we’re training the workforce at every level;” pulling back this funding risks “a situation where you can only earn a PhD if you’re already wealthy.” 
    Freezes and cuts in federal research funding at Massachusetts institutions will be a critical hit to the innovation that has cemented the United States as a vanguard in healthcare.Massachusetts scientists are using NIH grants to create new cancer drugs; develop new technologies—like the bionic pancreas—to treat disease; study ways to combat the opioid epidemic; and identify risk factors for heart disease, among other critical endeavors. As representatives from Massachusetts-based research institutions said, “if anyone in the world has a serious disease and they want to come to the US – they want to come to Boston.” 
    Federal funding disruptions will harm the Massachusetts and United States economies.The NIH is the largest single public funder of biomedical and behavioral research in the world, and in fiscal year 2023 NIH funding generated over $90 billion in economic activity in the United States. In Massachusetts along that same year, the NIH awarded $3.5 billion in grants in contracts that directly supported 28,842 jobs and nearly $7.5 billion in economic activity. 
    “The unprecedented actions taken by the Trump Administration will undermine the United States’ research edge—whether through abandoned research projects, staffing shortages, or a “brain drain” in our biotech workforce as young, budding scientists opt for other careers and countries with greater certainty,” concluded the lawmakers. 
    The senators urged the agencies to end the funding freeze and threats to cut grant expenditures and provide clarity on their directive-issuing processes and the rationale behind the indirect cost cap reduction by February 26, 2025. In 2017, following President Trump’s budget proposal seeking massive cuts to the NIH, Senator Warren released a report detailing the importance of NIH funding to Massachusetts. 

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Baldwin, Bipartisan Group of Colleagues Introduce Bill to Protect Great Lakes

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Wisconsin Tammy Baldwin

    WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Senator Tammy Baldwin (D-WI) joined a bipartisan group of her colleagues in introducing legislation to extend federal funding and protections for the Great Lakes. The Great Lakes Restoration Initiative Act of 2025 would reauthorize the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative (GLRI) through 2031 and increase the program’s annual funding. The GLRI is the most significant investment to restore and protect our Great Lakes.

    “Wisconsin’s Great Lakes not only play a vital role in shaping our way of life, but they also drive economic activity in countless communities up and down the Fresh Coasts and help move our Made in Wisconsin economy forward,” said Senator Baldwin. “I am proud to once again work with my Democratic and Republican colleagues to continue protecting these natural resources for the next generation of Wisconsin families, businesses, and visitors.”

    The GLRI combines federal and nonfederal efforts to stop the spread of carp and other invasive species, restore coastline and habitats connecting streams and rivers, clean up environmentally damaged Areas of Concern, and prevent future contamination. While providing vital support for these efforts, the GLRI also helps ensure we can address new and emerging threats to the Great Lakes. One independent economic study found that for every dollar the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative invests, it produces an additional $3.35 of economic activity

    Since its inception, the GLRI has spurred tremendous progress throughout the Great Lakes region including nearly half of a million acres of habitat protected, restored, or enhanced, a five-fold increase in the successful cleanup and delisting of Areas of Concern (AOCs), a ten-fold increase in the remediation of environmental and public health impairments, and reducing the threat of harmful algal blooms. The GLRI’s efforts have also resulted in economic returns of more than 3 to 1 across the region. Senator Baldwin has been a strong supporter of the GLRI program, leading the introduction and passage of the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative Act of 2019, and as a member of the Appropriations Committee, works to secure continued funding in the annual budget process.

    Wisconsin is home to four existing AOCs, the St. Louis River on Lake Superior and the Fox River, Sheboygan River and Milwaukee Estuary on Lake Michigan. Because of previous investments to restore its waters through the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative, the Lower Menominee River on Lake Michigan was removed in 2020. Senator Baldwin supported a $1 billion investment into address AOC’s in the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, which the Environmental Protection Agency projects will remove 22 of 25 remaining Great Lakes “Areas of Concern” by 2030, including all remaining sites in Wisconsin.

    This legislation is led by Senators Gary Peters (D-MI) and Todd Young (R-IN), and co-sponsored by Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), Bernie Moreno (R-OH), Jon Husted (R-OH), Dick Durbin (D-IL), Tina Smith (D-MN), Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY), John Fetterman (D-PA), Elissa Slotkin (D-MI), Chuck Schumer (D-NY), and Tammy Duckworth (D-IL).

    The legislation also shares broad support among Great Lakes advocates, including the Council of Great Lakes Governors, Great Lakes Fishery Commission, American Great Lakes Ports Association, Great Lakes and St. Lawrence Cities Initiative, American Sportfishing Association, Ducks Unlimited, Trout Unlimited, Congressional Sportsmen’s Foundation, League of Conservation Voters, National Wildlife Federation, Sierra Club, National Parks Conservation Association, Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership, National Audubon Society – Great Lakes, Environmental Law & Policy Center, MI League of Conservation Voters, Save the Dunes, Citizens Campaign for the Environment, Clean Wisconsin, Ohio Environmental Council, Western Reserve Land Conservancy, and Minnesota Environmental Partnership.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Industry focus

    Source: Tertiary Education Commission

    Last updated 5 March 2020
    Last updated 5 March 2020

    Print

    Share

    New Zealand is facing skills shortages in a number of sectors, including construction, food and fibre, health, and Secondary Initial Teacher Education.
    New Zealand is facing skills shortages in a number of sectors, including construction, food and fibre, health, and Secondary Initial Teacher Education.

    One of TEC’s core priorities is to help address these labour and skills shortages. Our work will link communities, industries, and education providers to education and employment pathways that are easy to navigate. Every New Zealander should have the skills, knowledge and confidence to create a fulfilling life.
    To achieve this, we are:

    building strategic partnerships and investing in provision that can deliver long-term post-study outcomes for learners 
    providing better quality learner information through our career services, including industry-specific attraction initiatives and dedicated career hub pages
    encouraging the development of quality and innovative learning packages and accessible pathways through funding training schemes and micro-credentials
    leading the work on the Reform of Vocational Education (RoVE). This includes developing a new Unified Funding System and facilitating the development of Centres of Vocational Excellence (CoVEs), Workforce Development Councils (WDCs) and working with MBIE as they facilitate the development of Regional Skills Leadership Groups (RSLGs).

    Related Content

    Reform of Vocational Education (RoVE)

    read more

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-OSI Security: Federal jury convicts Florida man of attempting to coerce minor for sex in Missoula undercover investigation

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    MISSOULA — A federal jury today convicted a Florida man of attempting to coerce a minor for sex after he was arrested in Missoula in an undercover investigation, U.S. Attorney Jesse Laslovich said.

    After a three-day trial that began on Feb. 10, the jury found the defendant, Stevenson Metelus, 36, of Margate, Florida, guilty of attempted coercion and enticement of a minor. Metelus faces a mandatory minimum of 10 years to life in prison, a $250,000 fine and at least five years to a lifetime of supervised release.

    U.S. District Judge Donald W. Molloy presided. The court will determine any sentence after considering the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and other statutory factors. Sentencing was set for June 24. Metelus was released pending further proceedings.

    “Metelus was a truck driver passing through Montana when he used social media to attempt to coerce a minor to have sex with him. The problem for him was he was unwittingly talking to an undercover law enforcement officer. This is the kind of critical work our office and our law enforcement partners are doing across the state to keep kids safe. Our work will continue, and it can only be done effectively due to the diligence, brilliance, and dedicated service of the people in our office and our law enforcement partners,” U.S. Attorney Laslovich said.

    The government alleged at trial and in court documents that in October 2023, an FBI special agent, using a persona identified as Child 1, posted on MegaPersonals an advertisement for prostitution services in Missoula, listed the age of Child 1 as “99” and a phone number at which to contact Child 1. Metelus responded to the ad on Nov. 16, 2023 and asked Child 1 what her “specials” were. Metelus spoke with Child 1, eventually negotiating a price and sexual acts to engage in with her. Child 1 noted she was a minor girl. Ultimately, Metelus asked Child 1 to meet him in his truck when he arrived, but Child 1 said she had a room at the hotel and would leave the door open for him. Child 1 then said that she could meet him at a nearby gas station when he expressed concern about the plan. The undercover FBI agent had confidential source call Metelus and, acting as Child 1, spoke briefly with him. The confidential source again told Metelus that she was a minor. The parties then confirmed their plans to meet. Shortly thereafter, Metelus texted Child 1 that he had arrived at the gas station, where law enforcement arrested him. Metelus eventually admitted to law enforcement his intention was to meet Child 1 for commercial sex.

    The U.S. Attorney’s Office is prosecuting the case. The FBI’s Montana Regional Violent Crime Task Force, Missoula Police Department and Missoula County Sheriff’s Office conducted the investigation.

    This case was brought as part of Project Safe Childhood, a nationwide initiative to combat the growing epidemic of child sexual exploitation and abuse launched in May 2006 by the Department of Justice. Led by U.S. Attorneys’ Offices and CEOS, Project Safe Childhood marshals federal, state, and local resources to better locate, apprehend and prosecute individuals who exploit children via the Internet, as well as to identify and rescue victims. For more information about Project Safe Childhood, please visit Justice.gov/PSC.

    XXX

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-Evening Report: Cook Islands opposition files no-confidence motion against PM

    By Melina Etches of the Cook Islands News

    A motion of no confidence has been filed against the Prime Minister and his Cabinet following the recent fiasco involving the now-abandoned Cook Islands passport proposal and the comprehensive strategic partnership the country will sign with China this week.

    Cook Islands United Party leader Teariki Heather said Prime Minister Mark Brown should apologise to the people and “graciously” step down, or else he would move a no-confidence vote against him in Parliament.

    Clerk of Parliament Tangata Vainerere today confirmed that a motion of no confidence has been filed, and he had placed the notice with the MPs.

    Parliament will convene for the first time this year next Monday, February 17, to consider various bills and papers, including the presentation of the supplementary budget.

    Heather, an Opposition MP, is concerned with Brown’s lack of consultation regarding the passport issue, which the Prime Minister later confirmed was “off the table”, and the China agreement with New Zealand.

    New Zealand has raised concerns that it was not properly consulted, as required under their special constitutional arrangement.

    However, PM Brown said he had advised them and did not believe the Cook Islands was required to provide the level of detail New Zealand was requesting.

    ‘Handled the situation badly’
    “He [Brown] has handled the situation badly. He has to step down graciously but if he doesn’t, I’m putting in a no confidence vote in Parliament — that’s the bottom line,” Heather told the Cook Islands News.

    “I will move that motion and if there’s no support at least I’ve done it, I’ve seen it through.”

    Heather also said that he believed the Prime Minister should apologise to the people of the Cook Islands.

    “A simple apology, he made a mistake, that’s it.”

    Cook Islands News asked the Leader of the Opposition Tina Browne for comment on Heather’s no confidence motion.

    Browne on Sunday told PMN that residents were angry, and there was mounting pressure and strong feeling that the PM Brown “should go” (step down).

    Backed by cabinet ministers
    The Prime Minister has the confidence of his Cabinet Ministers, who are backing their leader and the China agreement, according to Foreign Affairs Minister Tingika Elikana.

    Brown is in China on a state visit with his delegation. Yesterday marked the third day of the visit, during which he will oversee the signing of a Joint Action Plan for Comprehensive Strategic Partnership (CSP) with China.

    He is also expected to meet with Chinese Premier Li Qiang and President Xi Jinping.

    The content of the agreement and its signing date remain unknown.

    “At this stage, discussions regarding the agreement are still ongoing, and it would be premature to confirm a signing date at this time. However, once there are any formal developments, we will ensure updates are shared through an official MFAI media release,” a spokesperson for the Cook Islands Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Immigration told Cook Islands News.

    Public protest march
    A public protest march will convene at Parliament House on Monday to challenge the government’s direction for the people of the Cook Islands.

    Heather is spearheading the “peaceful” protest march, rallying citizens against PM Brown’s controversial proposal to introduce a Cook Islands passport.

    More than 100 people attended Heather’s public meeting last Monday evening at the Aroa Nui Hall to voice their concerns about government’s actions disregarding the voices of the people.

    “Do we just sit around no. Te inrinaki nei au e te marama nei kotou te iti tangata,” Heather said.

    “We have to do this for the sake of our country. This is not a political protest, it’s people of the Cook Islands uniting to protest, if you understand the consequences, you will understand the reason why.”

    Although Brown has since ditched the proposal after New Zealand warned it would require holders to renounce their New Zealand one, “the damage is done”.

    This has sparked heated debates about national identity, sovereignty and the implications for the Cook Islands relationship with New Zealand.

    Concerns of citizens
    Heather has taken onboard the concerns of citizens and argued that such a move could undermine the historical ties and shared citizenship that have long defined the relationship between the Cook Islands and New Zealand.

    He has no confidence in Brown’s statement that the proposed Cook Islands identity passport is “off the table”.

    “I think it is off the table for now . . .  but for how long?” Heather questioned.

    “Then there’s the impact of what he has done with our relationship with New Zealand so we are very much concerned about that.

    “We are making a statement. The march is actually to show the government of New Zealand that we the people of the Cook Islands don’t agree with the Prime Minister on that.

    “We want New Zealand to see that the people of the Cook Islands – that we love to keep our passport, that we care about our relationship as well.”

    Heather said they are also concerned about New Zealand’s reaction to the Cook Islands proposed agreement with China.

    ‘Peaceful’ protesters welcomed
    He welcomes members of the community to join the “peaceful” protest.

    On Monday morning, drummers will be located on both sides of Parliament House on the main road.

    At 10.45am, the proceedings will start when people start moving towards Parliament. Heather wants all protesters to bring along their New Zealand passports.

    Heather would like to remind people not to use dirty language at the protest — “auraka e autara viiviii, don’t bring your dirty laundry . . . ”

    First published by the Cook Islands News and republished with permission.

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI China: AI technology widely adopted during Spring Festival events

    Source: China State Council Information Office 2

    During the 2025 Intangible Cultural Heritage Gala aired by China Media Group on Jan. 31, a pack of ten robot dogs leaped, spun and waved in perfect harmony to a traditional dance song, wowing audiences with their flawless moves.
    This electrifying performance soon ignited social media, where amazed netizens dubbed them “the most dedicated dance crew” and marveled at the stunning fusion of cultural heritage and futuristic technology.

    A robot dog and actors perform lion dance during a temple fair celebrating the Lantern Festival at Xihu District in Hangzhou, east China’s Zhejiang Province, Feb. 11, 2025. (Xinhua/Han Chuanhao)
    The dancing Lite3 models showcased during the gala belong to the agile intelligent robot dog series of Hangzhou-based firm DEEP Robotics. Capable of carrying 7.5 kg payloads with a 5 km operational range and 1.5-2 hours continuous motion, these robots can perform complex maneuvers including high jumps and front flips.
    “Our proprietary joint modules, control systems and advanced algorithms enable unprecedented motion capabilities,” said Lin Yi, the company’s R&D manager. Users can engage in more diverse exercise training and development based on intelligent algorithms such as deep learning and reinforcement learning.
    Notably, artificial intelligence (AI) is entering Chinese households like never before — seamlessly blending into both daily life and entertainment.
    Dressed in colorful jackets, a group of humanoid robots became a highlight of this year’s Spring Festival gala, broadcast on Chinese New Year’s Eve. The 16 robots danced the Yangko, a traditional folk dance, alongside human performers. After the show, a “robot grandmother” was gently escorted offstage by the dancers — and the moment quickly went viral on social media.
    With its vast knowledge, eloquent expression, boundless imagination and playful wit, DeepSeek has captivated people of all ages, making it the ultimate “chat companion.” “I felt powerful after having a good command of DeepSeek,” said a retiree surnamed Ma, who downloaded the open-resource tool following his son’s strong recommendation.
    Beyond the virtual world, AI is becoming an ever-present force in daily life, not only enhancing online interactions but also transforming real-world experiences with remarkable efficiency. Whether at temple fairs or tourist attractions, AI is increasingly integrating into people’s daily lives, replacing servers and trainers, making candy figurines, playing games, carrying heavy loads, delivering goods and even assisting climbers.
    This year’s Spring Festival has been a celebration of AI-driven surprises, with each innovation sparking excitement and wonder. Social media is buzzing with netizens sharing and recommending their favorite high-tech experiences, making this a unique futuristic Chinese New Year.
    “Wow! No more video calls for New Year greetings!” said a tech worker surnamed Li. He uploaded a photo to the Baidu App, entered prompts like “firecrackers on Mars” and “dragon dance on the Forbidden City rooftop,” and added a festive message. In just over a minute, AI created a unique digital greeting card, making the experience effortless and exciting.
    AI’s shift from niche to mainstream success is driven by two key factors — practical application and strong technology. The key to AI’s widespread adoption is the effective alignment of technological advancements with real-world needs, according to Baidu chairman and CEO Robin Li.
    The success of AI is measured not by lab-based computing power, but by its impact on everyday users. Advanced technologies must be integrated into everyday life, making them accessible to all, turning tools once limited to a few into resources for the many, Li said.
    China’s AI industry ecosystem covers key segments ranging from chips, algorithms, data and platforms to applications. Over 4,500 companies are involved, with the core industry reaching a scale of nearly 600 billion yuan (about 82.1 billion U.S. dollars). In the past year alone, 238 new generative AI products have been registered.
    The strong demand for large AI models is clearly reflected in the impressive growth numbers. On Feb. 2, DeepSeek topped app markets in 140 regions, with daily active users exceeding 30 million. By last November, Baidu’s ERNIE had reached over 1.5 billion daily calls, a 30-fold increase from the previous year, while ByteDance’s Doubao saw daily token usage rise 33-fold by December 2024 after its launch in May 2024.
    Omdia, a consultancy focused on the tech industry, forecasts that China’s generative AI market will achieve 5.5-fold growth over the next five years — totaling 9.8 billion U.S. dollars by 2029.
    Looking forward, the wave sparked by DeepSeek continues to gain momentum, rapidly expanding its “ecosystem” and further activating the AI industry chain. Major cloud service providers like Huawei Cloud, Tencent Cloud, Alibaba Cloud and Baidu AI Cloud have integrated DeepSeek’s large models into their platforms.

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Press release: Government unveils plans for next generation of new towns

    Source: United Kingdom – Prime Minister’s Office 10 Downing Street

    Hundreds of thousands of working people and families will reap the rewards new towns across Britain, as the Prime Minister paves the way for the largest housebuilding programme since the post-war era.

    • Over 100 sites across England have come forward to be considered for next generation of new towns
    • Government on track to create beautiful communities, provide affordable homes, and deliver much needed infrastructure, including schools and nurseries, GP surgeries, and bus routes 
    • By taking on the blockers, 20,000 homes, along with new schools and health facilities, will move forward following government action, and we will now turn to unblock the remaining 700,000 homes across 350 sites 
    • Comes as government rolls out major planning reforms to sweep away the blockers and push through its housebuilding agenda as part of the Plan for Change

    Hundreds of thousands of working people and families will reap the rewards new towns across Britain, as the Prime Minister paves the way for the largest housebuilding programme since the post-war era.

    Visiting a housing development today, the Prime Minister will unveil the government’s plans for the next generation of new towns – well-designed, beautiful communities with affordable housing, GP surgeries, schools and public transport where people will want to live. 

    Over 100 proposals from across every region in England were submitted, showing local areas and housebuilders’ ambition to get on board to build the next generation of new towns – playing their part in getting Britain building and tackling the worst housing crisis in living memory. Every new town will have the potential to deliver 10,000 homes or more. 

    Delivering security is central to this government’s Plan for Change, because the least working people deserve when they graft hard is a secure home. That’s why the government is providing much-needed housing in the right places with the right infrastructure, and the New Towns Taskforce has today set clear principles on what the next generation of new towns will deliver: affordable housing, vital infrastructure and access to open green spaces and nature, to transform the lives of working people. 

    Prime Minister Keir Starmer said:

    For so many families, homeownership is a distant dream. After a decade of decline in housebuilding, the impact is a disconnect between working hard and getting on.

    This is about more than just bricks and mortar. It’s about the security and stability that owning your own home brings. I know what this means for working people – the roof above our head was everything for our family growing up. 

    We’ve already made progress in just seven months, unblocking 20,000 stuck homes. But there’s more to do.

    We’re urgently using all levers available to build the homes we need so more families can get on the housing ladder. We’re sweeping aside the blockers to get houses built, no longer accepting no as the default answer, and paving the way for the next generation of new towns.

    As part of the largest housebuilding programme since the post-war era, our ambitious Plan for Change will transform the lives of working people, once again connecting the basic principle that if you work hard, you should get on.

    Deputy Prime Minister and Secretary of State for Housing, Angela Rayner said:  

    Time and again we are seeing too many new homes stuck or stalled that not only act as a barrier to growth but also has real-world consequences for working people and families who see homeownership as nothing more than a distant dream.  

    I will not run away from the tough choices to fix the housing crisis we inherited that has left thousands of families on housing waiting lists, allowed homelessness to spiral out of control, and stopped an entire generation from picking up the keys to their first home.  

    While our vision for the next generation of new towns is setting the stage for a housebuilding revolution in the years to come, urgent action is needed now to build the homes and infrastructure that our local communities are crying out for. That’s why our New Homes Accelerator is working at pace to find solutions and remove blockages in the system, executing long-lasting solutions to get spades in the ground.  

    Today we are embarking on the next chapter in our Plan for Change to build 1.5 million new homes, deliver the biggest boost in social and affordable housing in a generation, and raise living standards for working people and families across the country.

    For far too long, working people have been let down by a decline in housebuilding. That’s why the government is rolling up its sleeves and is taking on the blockers with major reforms to planning regulation to get Britain building. 

    That work is already underway, with a staggering 20,000 new homes now successfully unblocked by the government’s novel ‘New Homes Accelerator’ programme, which deploys planning expertise to speed up the delivery of housing sites held by unnecessary delays.  

    Areas that have already benefitted from direct government action include:

    • Over 1,000 homes unlocked at Cowley Hill in Liverpool, where an agreement has been reached with the Environment Agency who withdrew its previous objections on both flood risk and biodiversity grounds, subject to planning.
    • And at Wolborough in Devon, the Accelerator has worked with Natural England to help accelerate this development, whilst ensuring environmental improvements are secured. On top of the 1,100 homes the site is injecting £1.75 million towards off-site pedestrian and cycle improvements, playing pitches, bus services and a local travel plan.  

    Housebuilders and local councils have put forward over 350 housing development sites stuck in the system under the previous government – that together could unlock around 700,000 new homes.

    Around a quarter of sites submitted are already receiving government attention since the call for evidence closed in October – demonstrating success of the programme, and local ambition to support the government’s 1.5 million homes target.

    This goes hand-in-hand with government action to overhaul the planning system, supporting the builders and not the blockers, taking the brakes off economic growth, raising living standards, and making the tough decisions to deliver for working people and families. 

    This includes:

    • Publishing a new growth-focused National Planning Policy Framework, which introduced new mandatory for councils to deliver the right homes in the right places, with a combined total of 370,000 homes a year.
    • Introducing the Planning and Infrastructure Bill next month. The Bill will overhaul environmental regulations to no longer accept the failed status quo where bats are more important than trains or newts more important than homes, and remove blockers to fast-track delivery of the homes and infrastructure that local communities need.    

    To get Britain building now – the government today announces plans to fast stream planning through brokering disagreements between the agencies and expert bodies, which by law must be consulted within the planning process. Bodies including National Highways, Natural England and the Environment Agency will need to bring planners and housebuilders to the table and iron out concerns that have been holding back development.

    Responding to sector concerns on pinch points, work stepping up with the Building Safety Regulator to ensure greater timeliness and efficiency when new tall buildings are signed off – to provide more homes for more people.

    This work will be bolstered by extra government funding announced today, including:  

    • £1 million for government agencies, including National Highways, Natural England and the Environment Agency, to speed up the planning approval of new homes and improve feedback to local authorities and industry where required.

    • £2 million to support the Building Safety Regulator to continue improving the processing for new-build applications.

    • Over £3 million of grants for local councils to bolster planning capacity, alongside direct advice and navigate through some of the more complex issues holding up new development.   

    Alongside the Accelerator, the government is also supporting local partners through a clearing service to help accelerate the sale of uncontracted and unsold affordable homes, with nearly 300 housebuilders, local councils and registered providers signing up in the first 50 days of its launch.   

    In December, the government set a clear hierarchy of brownfield first, grey belt second and green belt third. Today, further funding is being injected to drive regeneration and brownfield deliver in the following areas:  

    • £20 million to help transform neglected small-scale council-owned sites into new homes, for areas most in need.

    • Nearly £30 million from the Brownfield Infrastructure and Land Fund in Bradford to transform derelict brownfield sites into a vibrant residential area with 1,000 new homes, three community parks, shops, cafés, restaurants, and offices.

    • £1.5 million to support a regeneration programme at Manchester Victoria North, delivering a new district of 15,000 homes with transport links and green spaces.   

    Getting homes built for working people is a priority and is backed by investment in housing which is increasing to £5 billion for this year, including a top-up of £800 million being injected into the existing Affordable Homes Programme to help deliver tens of thousands of new affordable and social homes across the country.   

    This is in addition to an extra £100 million of cash to bolster local resources with increased planning fees to cover costs and funding to recruit 300 planning officers, making sure councils have the capacity they need to rubberstamp new homes and infrastructure.

    Updates to this page

    Published 13 February 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Nations: Deputy Secretary-General’s remarks to 2025 European Union Ambassadors Conference: “How the EU Can Better Leverage Its Unique Partnership with the UN System at the Country Level” [as prepared for delivery]

    Source: United Nations secretary general

    Excellencies,

    Ladies and gentlemen,

    I thank the High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and Vice-President of the European Commission, Kaja Kallas for her invitation. It is a pleasure to be back following my participation in this conference in 2022.

    Let me begin by congratulating the new EU leadership and welcoming the EU Commissioners. Your leadership comes at a critical juncture, and I look forward to working closely with you to strengthen the vital and strong partnership between our institutions.
    Excellencies,

    There is no doubt that the world we face today is more complex and uncertain than when we last met in 2022.

    We are seeing that geopolitical tensions, economic uncertainty, and a growing climate crisis are reshaping our global landscape. We are seeing key global players redefining their foreign policy and adding uncertainty to what is already a highly volatile political and economic environment.

    A few years ago, who would have imagined the war in Ukraine? Yet here we are, still grappling with the aftermath.

    I hope that we will be able to restore peace and stability in Ukraine, returning to a state of security that transcends the borders that have been so deeply affected.  We must also recognise that the greatest impact of these conflicts is felt by the people— not just in Ukraine but also in Gaza, Sudan, and the Sahel— people who are desperately searching for hope.

    The human toll is immeasurable, and this pressure on humanitarian support—where the European Union has been a generous leader—only adds to the challenges we face in achieving our Sustainable Development Goals.

    Excellencies,
     When we adopted the 2030 Agenda in 2015, we had a vision, but today, with five years to go, the road to realising our SDGs has become much more difficult. However, this does not mean we should abandon these Goals. Quite the opposite – they are now more urgent than ever.

    When we look at the poverty agenda, the inclusion agenda, human rights, climate, and the need for stronger institutions to support these goals, it becomes clear that we must intensify our collective efforts.

     But to get there, we would need stronger, not weaker, international cooperation reinforced by leadership. In September, our Member States came together to adopt the Pact for the Future, reaffirming our commitment to the 2030 Agenda and highlighting four areas of shared concern.

    First, we must tackle the peace and security agenda, recognising the rapid pace of technological advancements and the importance of staying ahead.

    Second, there’s the matter of AI and quantum computing—fields where we are making strides and where we must establish clear guardrails and work collaboratively. The European Union has taken commendable steps in this area, and we value the leadership you’ve shown. We look forward to deepening this cooperation.

    Third, we must address the urgent need to reform the international financial architecture. Many developing countries are grappling with overwhelming debt burdens and limited fiscal space. The combination of rising interest rates—unexpected, partly due to the war in Ukraine—and the aftermath of COVID-19 has put these countries in a difficult position. They are often forced to choose between funding essential services like education or health and servicing their debt. This is not just about managing a crisis; it is about shifting the conversation toward investment—investing in people, the future, and resilience.

    While Official Development Assistance (ODA) is undeniably vital, we must ensure it is strengthened so that it can truly fulfil its promise. ODA alone won’t be enough to meet the scale of the challenges we face. That’s why we must also find innovative ways to harness domestic resources and create an environment that attracts private sector investment.
    As many countries prioritise industrialisation and the growth of small and medium-sized enterprises, it is crucial that we also create the conditions that allow these efforts to flourish. We need to ensure that there is a favourable environment for domestic resources to be better utilised and for private sector investment to flow in. This way, we are giving countries a fair chance at financing their own development and creating sustainable, long-term solutions that go beyond ODA alone.

    Last but certainly not least, the Pact for the Future calls upon us to consider the future generations that will inherit the world we shape today. It emphasises the importance of keeping climate action at the centre of our efforts. As we move forward, we must ensure that these future constituencies are included in the decisions we make now.

    Excellencies,
    The values that underpin our global stability – and on which the UN-EU partnership is rooted are under attack: solidarity, peace, justice, tolerance, human rights, and a rules-based international order.

    We see the EU as an indispensable partner in defending these values.

    As we look ahead to 2025, this is a crucial moment to reflect on the path ahead. What are the EU’s priorities, and how can it balance work within Europe while nurturing the global partnerships that contribute to a more stable Europe and a more peaceful world?

    These partnerships are fundamental, as they not only support Europe’s security and prosperity but also promote the shared values that we all hold dear. This aligns with our UN Charter, which calls for a future built on peace, dignity, and prosperity for all.

    Excellencies,
    The SDGs offer a valuable framework for engaging with our partners across sectors—civil society, government, academia, business, and beyond. Investing in the SDGs should not be viewed as a burden but as a strategic opportunity—one that will drive future markets, social cohesion, resilience, and security, not least for the European Union itself.

    Goals 7 to 15 represent critical areas where economic investments and equality must be prioritized. By addressing these, we unlock dividends for the first six SDGs—providing governments with the resources to fund critical programs such as social protection, education, health, and women’s empowerment.

    However, these goals also depend on robust partnerships and strong institutions. Investing in governance and institutions may take longer to yield results, but it is the foundation for lasting change. The work is difficult, but it is vital if we are to secure a future where no one is left behind.

    To make this a reality, we must find ways to accelerate action on the SDGs together. That is why we have invested in strengthening our strategic UN-EU partnership, not just at the global level but critically – in countries. 

    Over the past years, and with the impulse provided by the Joint Guidance that was shared with you and the UN Resident Coordinators in 2023. We have seen our partnership grow in scope and impact, yielding results in joint advocacy, policy, and programmatic collaboration.

    Together, we have engaged in significant reflection on how to sharpen our focus and ensure that our efforts on the ground deliver greater impact. The UN has established a strong presence, but should we aim for even greater coordination and coherence? Absolutely. We continue to strive for that, and with recent policy decisions by some of our larger donors, we need to leverage these efforts to accelerate action on the ground.

    This is a crucial moment for us to also focus on the regional level—how we can deploy from HQ to the regions and ensure that the countries most in need can come together. The UN has the expertise, but is it sufficient? Can we deliver at the scale and speed that development demands?

    Right now, the answer is no. We need more investment—investment that can drive real change. To do that, we need to work more effectively together with the EU, multilateral development banks, national development banks, and regional institutions so that we can all pull in the same direction. Only by working together can we achieve the progress we need.

    Excellencies,
    In Guatemala, we jointly support the national digital transformation agenda, leveraging the joint SDG Fund digital track—where the EU is the most significant contributor—to scale up innovation and modernize public services.

    In Ghana, our focus is similar, with a special emphasis on empowering women and young people through digital transformation.

    In Bosnia and Herzegovina, joint UN-EU teams are tackling shared priorities, from energy and green transition to digital transformation, human rights, and gender equality. And we are enhancing our programmatic and policy collaboration.

    In Nepal, the focus is on climate resilience, where the melting glaciers are a stark reminder of the climate challenges we face.

    In Zambia, we are focusing on human rights, governance, and emergency response—especially in the wake of climate-related events.

    These are just a few examples of our growing cooperation at the country level. New areas for collaboration are being identified, and we are looking to scale up the work already being done. For example, in the context of food systems and investments, we are identifying synergies that can create a multiplier effect.

    We know that issues like food systems are as important to Europe as they are to Africa, Asia, and SIDS. We are looking at enhancing connectivity and energy access, particularly for small and medium-sized enterprises. This will help empower women, young people, and the agricultural sector by ensuring that businesses can access energy and financial services.
    Trade also plays a key role in this. By improving connectivity and access to e-commerce, we can help women and young people thrive economically. The intersection between education, technology, and the climate agenda is crucial for transforming societies.

    The Global Gateway Strategy and EU priorities, such as infrastructure investments, are vital in this regard. We must ensure we’re better aligned and able to deliver scalable, impactful change. The example of the M300 project, which aims to connect 300 million people to power in Africa, shows great promise—but we need to ensure that these connections are linked with other investments to amplify their impact.

    Excellencies,
    With UN Resident Coordinators and EU Ambassadors in 122 countries where we share presence in partner countries, we can achieve significant development impact that speaks to the ambition of the 2030 Agenda.

    You lead Teams Europe, while our Resident Coordinators steer the UN country teams. Each is making a difference. But by working together, we can aim for large-scale transformation.
    In most countries, we are already consulting each other on the development of our respective country strategies. But we see scope to expand opportunities for you and Resident Coordinators to co-lead regular strategic dialogues that enable the advancement of shared priorities and investment pathways to accelerate the implementation of the SDGs.

    Such pathways – or transitions – range from increasing energy access to transforming food systems, to advancing decent jobs, social protection, health and education, to expanding digital connectivity, to tackling the triple planetary crisis of climate change, biodiversity loss and pollution.

    Excellencies,
    Our institutions are transforming rapidly.

    Just as the EU is reshaping its development cooperation approach, including through the Global Gateway Strategy and the Team Europe approach, the UN development system is also enhancing its impact, coherence and efficiency.

    The UN development system reform spearheaded by the Secretary-General is bearing fruit. The feedback received from developing countries on how the UN is responding to their development needs is very clear.

     In 2023, 96 percent of host governments said that UN teams on the ground are effectively responding to national priorities for SDG delivery. And 92 percent of host governments said that UN Resident Coordinators effectively lead the delivery of strategic support for national plans and priorities, compared to 79 percent in 2019.

    By leveraging our respective expertise and capacities, we can maximise synergies between Global Gateway priorities and the key transitions required for SDG acceleration.
    In complex settings, your leadership, alongside that of the Resident Coordinators, is equally critical to strengthening the coherence between humanitarian, development and peacebuilding action to enable early development investments and to help countries return to a development path.

    Together, we can promote development partners’ coordination mechanisms that are adapted to the country’s context and enable alignment of development investments with national priorities and the SDGs.

    By leveraging our respective convening power, we can scale up collaboration with governments and the national financing ecosystems, as well as International Financing Institutions and multilateral development banks – using existing tools such as the Integrated National Financing Frameworks.

    By challenging business as usual, beyond siloed or project-based models, we can — and we must— develop multistakeholder platforms for innovative financing and policy support.

    Excellencies,
    The challenges are immense but not insurmountable.

    Our strong partnership with the EU gives me hope.

    By strengthening our partnership even further, we can turn the Pact for the Future’s ambition for the SDGs into concrete, life-changing results across the globe.

    But the time for acceleration is now.

    Let us act boldly for a more equitable, resilient, and sustainable future where no one is left behind.

    Thank you.

    .

    .
     

    MIL OSI United Nations News

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Unwelcome but necessary: a week’s more night work needed Humphrey St/SH6 intersection, Queenstown

    Source: New Zealand Transport Agency

    Much weaker than anticipated ground conditions at the road work site near Queenstown’s Kawarau River bridge means a week’s more work, says NZ Transport Agency Waka Kotahi (NZTA).

    Instead of ending on 21 February, the night work will run through to Friday morning, 28 February, says Peter Standring, Maintenance Contract Manager for NZTA in Central Otago.

    “We know this work, which is happening overnight to avoid most daytime traffic, is unwelcome to local residents given the noise generated and vibrations from machinery removing the old road layers,” says Mr Standring. “But it is essential we get the asphalting right. As a result, we need to excavate deeper than anticipated to get a lasting road surface.”

    The NZTA crews are using a stronger pavement mixture for this section of SH6 to extend its life as much as possible, but they still need a solid sub-surface underneath it, he says. The site is managed with Stop/Go traffic management overnight, creating short delays.

    Work started on 9 February, 8 pm to 6 am, and will now run for the extra third week to the end of February, Sunday nights to Thursday nights.

    “Crews will continue to do whatever they can to fit in the noisiest activity in the early part of the night,” says Mr Standring. “We thank everyone for being patient while we get this highway reconstruction done to a high standard to last for many years.”

    The highway is down to 30km/hour daytimes while the night work is underway.

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-OSI Security: Update 274 – IAEA Director General Statement on Situation in Ukraine

    Source: International Atomic Energy Agency – IAEA

    Today’s scheduled rotation of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) team currently based at Ukraine’s Zaporizhzhya Nuclear Power Plant (ZNPP) was cancelled as a result of intense military activity in the region, Director General Rafael Mariano Grossi said.

    Despite written assurances received from both sides that the planned rotation could take place safely, the situation proved to be too dangerous for the teams to continue and the mission was aborted.

    “I deeply regret today’s cancellation of the carefully prepared and agreed rotation of our staff, who are carrying out vital work in very challenging circumstances to help prevent a nuclear accident during the military conflict. It is completely unacceptable that the safety of our staff is jeopardised in this way,” Director General Grossi said.

    “As a result of these extremely concerning events, I am in active consultation with both sides to guarantee the safety of our teams and to secure the continued presence of the IAEA at the Zaporizhzhya Nuclear Power Plant to enable our staff to continue their indispensable mission, helping to maintain nuclear safety and security,” he said.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-Evening Report: ‘It’s a house battery you can drive around’ – how a handful of Australians are selling power back to the grid from their cars

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Scott Dwyer, Research Director, Energy Futures, University of Technology Sydney

    24K-Productions

    Our cars sit unused most of the time. If you have an electric vehicle, you might leave it charging at home or work after driving it. But there’s another step you could take. If you have a bidirectional charger, you can set it to sell power back to the grid when demand is high.

    Fewer than ten people across Australia actually do this, because the technology – known as Vehicle-to-Grid (V2G) – is very new. To date, it only works with a single car model (Nissan LEAF) and a single charger (Wallbox Quasar 1). We’ve estimated the number of users based on sales of this charger. The chargers are expensive and there’s a thicket of regulations to navigate.

    But that could soon change. Last year, Climate Change Minister Chris Bowen announced new Australian standards and communications protocols for bidirectional chargers in a bid to make it mainstream. Cheaper EVs and bidirectional chargers will make this more appealing.

    If it takes off, V2G could become extremely useful to the power grid as a way to release power as required and stabilise the grid against fluctuations.

    This week, Australia’s renewable energy agency released a V2G roadmap, which notes widespread uptake could “materially reduce electricity costs for consumers and accelerate national emissions reduction”.

    To understand why people are using the technology and the challenges to do so, we interviewed five early adopters from New South Wales and South Australia. Our findings are released today.

    A bidirectional charger is necessary to sell power back to the grid.
    doublelee/Shutterstock

    Setting up V2G isn’t easy

    Our interviewees reported a long, complex journey to set up V2G. These early adopters had no playbook to follow, so the process was one of trial and error.

    Some relied on professional networks or social media groups to gather information. They spent significant time and energy finding electricians, installers and charger manufacturers to set up their systems. Strata approvals were required. They also had to negotiate with power retailers and distributors.

    Delays were common, especially when seeking approval from the energy distributor. Some interviewees reported delays of months to years.

    Most interviewees had experience in a technical field such as engineering or technology. Some reported a significant learning curve, while others using new software from their retailer reported a smoother “set and forget” process.

    So why do it? Our interviewees had several reasons, ranging from getting the most out of expensive assets (solar and the EV) to offsetting power bills entirely.

    Four out of five interviewees reported making a small profit of about A$1,000 annually instead of a bill. Many wanted to be able to reduce dependence on the grid and reduce their environmental impact.

    As one told us:

    you originally think of it as a car you can also use to power your house. [But actually] it’s a house battery you can drive around.

    Maximising savings

    Typically, our interviewees plugged their car in at home during the day to charge from their rooftop solar. In the evenings when power prices peaked, they used an app to sell power back to the grid. This maximised their cost savings for charging the car battery and their earnings from the grid.

    For instance, a V2G user was alerted by their energy retailer that power prices had spiked to over $20 per kilowatt hour – far above normal rates of 25–45 cents. They immediately set their car and home battery to sell power back to the grid. In two hours, they sold 28 kilowatt hours of power to the grid and made more than $560. As they told us: “I look forward to more such events.”

    Our interviewees often monitored energy prices, solar output and car battery levels to optimise their output. To avoid their EV battery getting too low, they set a lower limit – say 30% of charge – after which their car would stop exporting power.

    This photo shows the setup of one of our early adopter interviewees. Pictured is the Nissan LEAF and bidirectional charger. For years, this has been the only car model compatible with vehicle to grid, but this is set to change.
    Author provided, CC BY-NC-ND

    Is there a downside?

    One of the main reasons people are sceptical of V2G is due to concern about accelerated degradation of the battery.

    This is a common concern. But to date, there’s no consensus showing V2G shortens the battery life of EVs significantly. One recent study shows it increases degradation by 0.3% a year. But another showed V2G might actually extend battery life in some scenarios.

    Last year, we surveyed more than 1,300 members of a motoring organisation about their view of V2G technology. We found battery warranty was a bigger concern than battery life. This is because most EV manufacturers other than Nissan don’t mention V2G in their battery warranties, leading drivers to believe they might void their warranty by using V2G.

    Awareness of V2G technology is growing. The survey also found almost 40% of respondents were very or somewhat familiar with V2G, a jump from the 17% who reported familiarity in 2022. Among EV owners, almost 90% reported knowledge of the concept.

    Moving beyond early adopters

    For V2G to go mainstream, the process must be much simpler, cheaper and easier to set up.

    To accelerate uptake, reliable, accessible information is essential.

    Expanding government incentive programs to include bidirectional chargers would cut the upfront cost and make it more accessible.

    Even within the EV supply chain, knowledge of V2G is limited. Car dealerships will need to know which models work with V2G.

    Electricians may need specific training to install and maintain these chargers.

    EVs are falling in price as manufacturers vie for market share and cheaper options become available. V2G capabilities might help boost sales for competing car companies.

    As more motorists switch to EVs, interest in V2G will increase. While V2G can boost the appeal of EVs, there are others, such as Vehicle-to-Home (using your car to power your home during blackouts or to save money) and Vehicle-to-Load (using your EV to run power tools or appliances).

    Each of these can help consumers get more value from the vehicles parked in driveways and garages.

    Scott Dwyer receives funding from iMOVE Australia Cooperative Research Centre and the NRMA for this project.

    Scott Dwyer receives funding from iMOVE Australia Cooperative Research Centre and the NRMA for this project.

    Kriti Nagrath receives funding from iMOVE Australia Cooperative Research Centre and the NRMA for this project.

    ref. ‘It’s a house battery you can drive around’ – how a handful of Australians are selling power back to the grid from their cars – https://theconversation.com/its-a-house-battery-you-can-drive-around-how-a-handful-of-australians-are-selling-power-back-to-the-grid-from-their-cars-249696

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-Evening Report: You’re playing (or watching) sport and someone blurts out a racial slur. The next 60 seconds are crucial

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Aish Ravi, Lecturer in Curriculum, Teaching and Inclusive Education, Monash University

    In October last year, the Australian Sports Commission (ASC) launched Dealing with the Moment: Anti-Racism in Community Sport, a free online course designed to help community coaches, parents, umpires and players respond to racism in sport.

    The course equips people with the tools they need to intervene effectively when racism occurs, ensuring everyone feels safe, welcome and respected.

    One of the key recommendations from the course is what to do if you hear someone say something racist on the sports field.

    Why racist remarks are so damaging

    Racist remarks hurt more than just a player’s feelings — they attack their sense of belonging and identity on the field.

    I know from my own experiences.

    During my years playing various community sports as a young adult, including Australian rules football, soccer and cricket, I was often one of the only people of colour.

    In those moments, I wanted my play and skills to be the focus but unfortunately, my appearance often made me stand out, which led to racist comments.

    Those remarks were deeply offensive and hurtful. They made me feel like I didn’t belong or shouldn’t be there.

    Racism in sport sends a harmful message: that someone doesn’t belong because of their skin colour or background. These incidents leave lasting emotional and psychological scars, even if they don’t result in physical harm.

    Why I helped develop the course

    I worked on developing the course to address a significant gap in how racism is handled in community sport.

    The course aims to ensure all sport participants have a positive and inclusive experience and that everyone understands the importance of addressing racism immediately – in the moment.

    It’s not good enough to delay action, even if that’s how it has often been done in the past. Some organisations claim that delaying action allows for thorough investigations and careful consideration.

    However, this is often a strategy to protect reputations and minimise backlash rather than address the root causes of the problem.

    Such delays can silence victims, perpetuate harm, and show a lack of genuine commitment to tackling systemic racism. Immediate action is necessary to demonstrate accountability and foster meaningful change.

    We must do better. We need to see progress, not stagnation.

    So, what should you do after a racist comment?

    If you don’t have time to dive into the full course, here are the key lessons:

    • the first 60 seconds are crucial: intervening immediately sends a strong message that racism won’t be tolerated and shows support for the victim

    • understand racism: recognise what racism is and how it affects people. Never dismiss someone’s experience by saying it’s “not racism” or telling them to “get over it”. Just because the harm isn’t physical doesn’t mean it’s not significant

    • take action: the course provides clear guidance on how to respond effectively to incidents of racism and support those affected.

    Why are the first 60 seconds so cruical?

    Acting early allows you to nip the issue in the bud by calling it out and intervening on the spot. It leaves no room for misinterpretation of events or for the narrative to shift.

    The longer the delay, the more time it allows for the situation to be downplayed, the narrative to change, or for excuses to be made.

    Ultimately, delays often result in the issue being swept under the carpet, with no one taking accountability for the harm caused.

    Immediate action demonstrates clarity, conviction, and a genuine commitment to addressing racism.

    Strategies for coaches, parents and officials

    Everyone — coaches, parents, officials, players and spectators — has a role to play when dealing with racism. Here are some practical strategies:

    • acknowledge and act: staying silent is not an option. A simple statement like “that’s not okay” sends a strong message of support and sets a clear standard of behaviour

    • use your authority: coaches can address players directly, officials can stop play, and parents can challenge inappropriate behaviour from the sidelines. Everyone has the power to intervene

    • educate yourself: take the course or learn more about racism so you feel confident and empowered to act

    • don’t minimise the impact: never tell someone to brush it off or suggest it’s not a big deal. Acknowledge their feelings, show empathy, and take the situation seriously

    • apply this to all inappropriate behaviour: these strategies aren’t limited to racism. They apply to misogynistic, homophobic, or other harmful remarks as well.

    Sport should be for everyone

    We live in a multicultural society – a melting pot of diverse cultures that is beautifully reflected on our streets and in our classrooms. It would be wonderful to see this diversity equally represented in community sport.

    Greater representation on the field and in the stands would create a sense of belonging and allow all players to thrive, regardless of their background.

    This is why addressing racism is so crucial — it paves the way for more inclusive and equitable participation in sport.

    The goal is to make sport a space where diversity is celebrated, teamwork is valued, and everyone can thrive without fear of discrimination.

    We can all play a part in creating lasting change.

    Aish Ravi receives funding from organisations for consulting work on training and education and evaluation work. She is also on various volunteer committees advocating for change.

    ref. You’re playing (or watching) sport and someone blurts out a racial slur. The next 60 seconds are crucial – https://theconversation.com/youre-playing-or-watching-sport-and-someone-blurts-out-a-racial-slur-the-next-60-seconds-are-crucial-248671

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI Submissions: USAID Cuts – Uncertainty around PEPFAR program puts millions of people at risk – MSF

    Source: Médecins Sans Frontières/Doctors Without Borders (MSF)

    New York/Johannesburg/Brussels, February 13, 2025 — The decision by the US government to temporarily freeze funding to the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) alongside all other foreign aid for at least a 90-day period has had immediate effects on people living with HIV (PLHIV), said Médecins Sans Frontières/Doctors Without Borders (MSF) today. Although the US has since clarified that certain treatment programs can continue at least until April, we are concerned that critical elements of the PEPFAR program remain frozen.

    “More than three weeks since the US government froze PEPFAR funding, there is still widespread confusion and uncertainty as to whether this critical lifeline for millions of people has been cut off,” said Avril Benoît, chief executive officer of MSF USA. “Despite a limited waiver covering some activities, what our teams are seeing in many of the countries where we work is that people have already lost access to lifesaving care and have no idea whether or when their treatment will continue. MSF is calling on the US government to immediately resume funding for the full range of PEPFAR operations as well as other critical health and humanitarian aid.”

    On February 1, after over a week of chaos and a freeze of activities, the US government issued a limited waiver allowing for the resumption of some programming with specific guidance for HIV. However, that guidance was unclear, and it did not immediately reach PEPFAR country teams. Across our broad network, MSF did not see a single organization able to resume work as a result of this limited guidance on waivers. On February 6, the US government issued clarified guidance on HIV care and treatment and prevention of mother to child transmission (PMTCT) programs.

    However, we remain concerned that key areas of HIV prevention, treatment, care, and support are not included in this additional guidance, such as pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for all vulnerable groups, including LGBTQ people and sex workers, specific interventions for adolescents girls and young women in high prevalence countries, and community-led monitoring programs. These services are essential to ensuring a successful response to the epidemic.

    While MSF does not accept US government funding and will not be directly affected by cuts or freezes to PEPFAR, many of our activities are contingent on the programs that have been interrupted. In some places we’ve had to adapt and change our activities and the indirect effects of these freezes have already been felt in our projects in various parts of the world.

    In Sub-Saharan Africa, where MSF runs several HIV/AIDS and related health programs, we are already witnessing impacts on patients. In South Africa, many clinics providing HIV services, including testing, treatment, and PrEP through PEPFAR-funded organizations have been shuttered, leaving people confused and distressed about where to access their critical medication. In Mozambique, a major partner organization of MSF that provided comprehensive HIV services had to stop activities completely. In Zimbabwe, most organizations providing HIV services have also stopped work, disrupting in particular the DREAMS program aimed at decreasing new HIV infections in adolescent girls and young women.

    “Any interruption to HIV services and treatment is deeply distressing to people in care and an emergency when it comes to HIV treatment,” said Tom Ellman, director of the South Africa Medical Unit at MSF Southern Africa. “HIV medicines must be taken daily or people run the risk of developing resistance or deadly health complications.”

    In Democratic Republic of Congo, the aid freeze was already affecting the most successful model of antiretroviral drug distribution ever implemented in the capital city of Kinshasa: the community-run free distribution and peer support points, known locally as “PODIs”. In a country where stigma against people living with HIV is massive and poverty remains a barrier to care, PODIs have proven to be a medically necessary approach for addressing delays or therapy abandonment. With PEPFAR-supported points of care now closed and other activities frozen, thousands of people were left without support and with a high risk of developing advanced HIV. MSF teams supporting advanced HIV disease care in Kinshasa might not be able to meet the increased demand if disruptions persist.

    In South Sudan, approximately 51 percent of people living with HIV know their status, and 47 percent are on treatment. A discontinuation of this program will have devastating effects on thousands of people and their communities.  MSF has worked alongside PEPFAR providing essential HIV care in this context and has seen firsthand how this program saves lives. The support of PEPFAR in this country is critical.

    PEPFAR-supported programming is deeply interconnected with and reliant on other components of the US foreign aid system, specifically implementation support provided by USAID and technical and other assistance provided by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Given that the foreign aid freeze and stop-work orders continue to affect these other agencies, and staff from these agencies have been put on immediate leave or recalled, it is unclear when and how even the limited activities now allowed will be able to restart.

    “These disruptions will cost lives and upend years of progress against this virus,” said Benoit. “Every day that passes is an emergency for millions of people for whom PEPFAR is a lifeline.”

    PEPFAR-supported programming has been heavily integrated into key aspects of the broader health systems of partner countries over the last 20 plus years and as a result the consequences of these disruptions have been far-reaching. For this reason, some of the services affected go beyond purely HIV treatment and prevention, such as in Uganda, where PEPFAR-funded aspects of infectious disease surveillance and response, including for Ebola virus, have been stopped.

    “When MSF first started treating people with HIV/AIDS in South Africa 25 years ago, there were no ARV medicines on the shelves, every diagnosis felt like a death sentence, and communities were desperately trying to curb the virus’ spread,” said Ellman.

    Since then, PEPFAR support has helped save more than 25 million lives and encouraged the fight against HIV to be a truly global one. But continued success relies on continued access to the full range of HIV-related programs, services, and goods including prevention services and treatment, population-specific and targeted programs, programs related to gender-based violence, and other critical areas, said MSF.

    As health care providers, we are deeply concerned by these disruptions to this lifesaving program.

    “Even temporary interruptions to key components of PEPFAR will harm people at risk of acquiring HIV and people living with HIV,” said Benoît. “We urge the US government to immediately resume all funding of critical humanitarian and health aid, including the full range of PEPFAR operations.”

    MSF is an international, medical, humanitarian organisation that delivers medical care to people in need, regardless of their origin, religion, or political affiliation. MSF has been working in Haiti for over 30 years, offering general healthcare, trauma care, burn wound care, maternity care, and care for survivors of sexual violence. MSF Australia was established in 1995 and is one of 24 international MSF sections committed to delivering medical humanitarian assistance to people in crisis. In 2022, more than 120 project staff from Australia and New Zealand worked with MSF on assignment overseas. MSF delivers medical care based on need alone and operates independently of government, religion or economic influence and irrespective of race, religion or gender. For more information visit msf.org.au  

    MIL OSI – Submitted News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Grassley, Cantwell Reintroduce Bills to Lower Prescription Drug Prices, Drive PBM Accountability

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Iowa Chuck Grassley
    WASHINGTON – Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee and former Chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, and Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.), Ranking Member of the Senate Commerce Committee, are reintroducing two bipartisan bills to combat the high cost of prescription drugs and provide greater transparency of pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs).
    “Iowans are fed up with the skyrocketing cost of prescription drugs and eager for Congress to act to put a stop to pharmacy benefit managers’ shady practices. These bipartisan legislative solutions will bring much-needed transparency to prescription drug pricing and ensure the federal government can effectively target the abusive practices that unfairly drive up drug costs,” Grassley said.  
    “For too long, Americans have been left in the dark while PBMs – the mysterious middlemen – manipulate prescription drug prices. We need to hold PBMs accountable for skyrocketing drug costs. With these bipartisan bills, I’m continuing to fight for accountability and transparency in the drug market so we can shine a light on unfair practices and make sure patients get a fair deal on the medications they need,” Cantwell said.
    Prescription Pricing for the People Act:
    This bill requires the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to complete a 6(b) study examining the effects of consolidation on pricing in the PBM industry, as well as other potentially abusive behavior by PBMs. The bill instructs the FTC to provide policy recommendations to Congress to improve competition and protect consumers.
    Grassley has welcomed the FTC’s interim staff reports on opaque PBM practices. The interim staff reports are a direct result of Grassley’s prior requests for a 6(b) study on potential anti-competitive practices in the prescription drug industry, as well as his bipartisan demands for a status update in light of FTC’s significant delays. Once passed, this legislation will bring the FTC 6(b) study to completion. The bill falls within the jurisdiction of the Senate Judiciary Committee.
    Additional cosponsors are Sens. Roger Marshall (R-Kan.), Peter Welch (D-Vt.), Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.), Chris Coons (D-Del.), Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), Shelley Moore Capito (R-W.Va.), Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii) and James Lankford (R-Okla.).
    The bipartisan proposal is supported by the AARP, AIDS Healthcare Foundation, American Pharmacists Association, Biotechnology Innovation Organization, Community Oncology Alliance, National Community Pharmacists Association and National Association of Specialty Pharmacy.
    Pharmacy Benefit Manager (PBM) Transparency Act:
    This bill bans deceptive and unfair pricing schemes, prohibits arbitrary claw backs of payments made to pharmacies, and requires PBMs to report to the FTC on how much money they make through spread pricing and pharmacy fees. The bill falls within the jurisdiction of the Senate Commerce Committee.
    Additional cosponsors are Sens. Joni Ernst (R-Iowa), Peter Welch (D-Vt.), Shelley Moore Capito (R-W.Va.), Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.), Roger Marshall (R-Kan.), Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), Jerry Moran (R-Kan.), Cindy Hyde-Smith (R-Miss.), Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) and Mike Rounds (R-S.D.).
    The bipartisan proposal is supported by the AARP, AIDS Healthcare Foundation, American Pharmacists Association, Association for Clinical Oncology, Association of Mature American Citizens, Autoimmune Association, Biotechnology Innovation Organization, Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation, Community Oncology Alliance, National Community Pharmacists Association and National Association of Specialty Pharmacy.
    “AARP, which advocates for the more than 100 million Americans aged 50 and over, is pleased to support the Prescription Pricing for the People Act of 2025 and Pharmacy Benefit Manager (PBM) Transparency Act of 2025. We value your ongoing bipartisan efforts to lower drug prices for consumers and taxpayers. It is outrageous that Americans pay the highest prices in the world for prescription drugs,” said Bill Sweeney, Senior Vice President, Government Affairs, AARP.
    “APhA supports Senators Grassley’s and Cantwell’s reintroduction of the Pharmacy Benefit Manager Transparency Act, which would go a long way toward addressing PBMs’ anticompetitive business practices putting many independent pharmacies out of business and creating ‘pharmacy deserts’ in rural and underserved communities, where the neighborhood pharmacy may be the only health care provider for miles. We also support the Prescription Pricing for the People Act directing the FTC to report on ways to enforce antitrust and consumer protection laws. APhA stands ready to work with Senators Grassley and Cantwell and the FTC to not only examine PBMs’ anticompetitive business practices but to take the necessary actions to end them,” said the American Pharmacists Association.
    “The Community Oncology Alliance (COA) commends Senators Grassley and Cantwell for once again taking an early lead in introducing pharmacy benefit manager (PBM) legislation in the 119th Congress. The Prescription Pricing for the People Act (S.113 in the 118th Congress) and the Pharmacy Benefit Manager (PBM) Transparency Act (S.127 in the 118th Congress) lit the fuse for additional legislation in both the Senate and the House to stop the top PBMs from harming patients, especially those with cancer. We thank Senators Grassley and Cantwell for their leadership in reintroducing these bills in the 119th Congress. Americans face medication delays and denials, as well as higher costs and waste, at the hands of the top PBMs, especially CVS/Caremark, Cigna/Express Scripts, and United/Optum Rx, which control 80 percent of the prescription drug market. They have to be stopped from harming cancer patients and others with serious diseases. It’s time for Congress to act now!” said Ted Okon, Executive Director, Community Oncology Alliance (COA).
    “Increased transparency into PBM operations is critical to understanding the many ways their underhanded tactics lead to increased costs, delayed access to care, and an unfair marketplace for independent pharmacies – tactics that need swift, significant reforms. The PBMs’ attempt to block every action to increase transparency in the drug delivery system should concern everyone from patients to policymakers. We’re grateful to our allies in Congress like Sens. Grassley and Cantwell for keeping these bills on their agenda and pushing for accountability and change. PBM reform cannot wait,” said B. Douglas Hoey, CEO, National Community Pharmacists Association.
    “IBD patients deserve to understand why PBMs are making the decisions that they do, and whether these decisions are financially motivated or based on science. They should also share in any cost savings achieved by PBMs. The Pharmacy Benefit Manager Transparency Act would make great strides in revealing the true motives and operating practices of PBMs, and in aligning their incentives with increased patient access to medications,” said Erin McKeon, Director, Federal Advocacy, Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation.
    “The Pharmacy Benefit Manager Transparency Act of 2025 would prevent anti-competitive practices and require PBMs to operate with full transparency. This bill ensures that PBMs can no longer manipulate pricing, prioritize profits over patients, or exploit loopholes that drive up costs. AMAC Action is committed to protecting seniors from predatory pricing schemes and ensuring they have access to affordable prescription medications. We commend you both for leading this bipartisan effort and urge Congress to swiftly pass this legislation to bring long-overdue transparency and accountability to the PBM industry,” said Andrew J. Mangione Jr., Senior Vice President, AMAC Action.
    About Pharmacy Benefit Managers
    PBMs were initially formed in the 1960s to process claims and negotiate lower drug prices with drug makers. Now, PBMs administer prescription drug plans for hundreds of millions of Americans.
    Today, three PBMs control nearly 80 percent of the prescription drug market. They serve as middlemen, managing every aspect of the prescription drug benefits process for health insurance companies, self-insured employers, unions and government programs.
    They operate out of the view of regulators and consumers — setting prescription costs, deciding what drugs are covered by insurance plans and how they are dispensed, pocketing unknown sums that might otherwise be passed along as savings to consumers, and undercutting local independent pharmacies.
    This lack of transparency makes it impossible to fully understand if and how PBMs might be manipulating the prescription drug market to increase profits and drive-up drug costs for consumers.
    Background:
    Grassley has long championed efforts to reduce the cost of prescription drugs. Three pieces of legislation authored and coauthored by Grassley have been signed into law to combat anticompetitive practices and stop drug makers from reaping profits at the expense of taxpayers and consumers. Grassley has also led in-depth congressional investigations to expose those responsible for prescription drug price gouging.  
    Other actions include:
    January 2025: Grassley welcomed the FTC’s second interim staff report on PBMs and urged congressional and executive branch action.
    July 2024: Grassley welcomed the FTC’s interim staff report on PBMs and urged congressional and executive branch action.
    January 2024: Grassley sent a letter urging the FTC to complete its investigation into the health care industry’s most powerful prescription drug middlemen.
    November 2023: The Finance Committee adopted a Grassley-led provision to strengthen oversight of CMS and hold PBMs accountable. 
    July 2023: The Finance Committee adopted several Grassley-led PBM accountability provisions. 
    March 2023: The Senate Commerce Committee passed a Grassley-backed bill to hold PBMs accountable for unfair practices driving up costs for consumers.
    February 2023: The Senate Judiciary Committee — which Grassley currently chairs — passed five Grassley-led bills to boost competition in the pharmaceutical industry and improve patients’ access to more affordable prescription drugs.
    October 2022: Grassley led a bipartisan letter urging the FTC to complete its investigation into PBMs to shine light on drug pricing practices.
    January 2021: Grassley and Senate Finance Committee Ranking Member Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) released a two-year bipartisan investigation into insulin price gouging.
    August 2018: Grassley requested the FTC assess pharmaceutical supply chain intermediaries.
    Learn more about Grassley’s persistent efforts to lower prescription drug costs HERE.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Grassley, Cassidy Introduce Legislation to Ensure Viability of Organ Transplant Reforms

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Iowa Chuck Grassley
    WASHINGTON – Sens. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Bill Cassidy, M.D. (R-La.), Chairmen of the Senate Judiciary Committee and the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, respectively, today introduced legislation to enable the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA)’s continued implementation of Grassley’s life-saving reforms to the U.S. organ transplant system. The OPTN Fee Collection Authority Act would authorize HRSA to collect registration fees from OPTN member institutions, ensuring HRSA’s ability to maintain the improved organ transplant system.
    “It’s critically important our organ transplant system operates safely and efficiently, because lives hang in the balance. I was proud to lead reforms to our antiquated organ transplant system, and have been closely following HRSA’s implementation of the law at every turn. This latest fix will ensure HRSA has the tools it needs to implement the law as Congress intended, and patients receive the care they need,” Grassley said.
    “Continuing our efforts to reform the U.S. organ transplant system is vital to saving lives,” Cassidy said. “This legislation takes additional steps to improve the system and ensure more Americans can access lifesaving organs.”
    Find bill text HERE.
    Background:
    The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) is a federal program, founded in 1984 and housed under the Department of Health and Human Services’ Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), that is responsible for coordinating all organ donations and transplants nationwide. For 40 years, the OPTN was operated by a single, deficient contractor – the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS).
    Grassley in 2023 authored and passed a bipartisan law to break up the OPTN contract, resulting in the first competitive bidding process for OPTN contracts in the program’s nearly half-a-century history. Previously, UNOS, as the sole OPTN contractor, collected all OPTN registration fees from Organ Procurement Organizations, transplant hospitals and other member institutions. The Grassley-Cassidy legislation provides HRSA explicit legal authority to collect these fees, rooting out UNOS’ and any other contractors’ undue influence and safeguarding the revamped program’s operation. The bill also requires a Government Accountability Office report to Congress within two years of the bill’s passage.
    -30-

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Durbin Delivers Opening Statement During Senate Judiciary Committee Hearing For Justice Department Executive Nominees

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Illinois Dick Durbin
    February 12, 2025
    WASHINGTON – U.S. Senate Democratic Whip Dick Durbin (D-IL), Ranking Member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, today delivered an opening statement during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on the nominations of Todd Blanche to be Deputy Attorney General (DAG), and Gail Slater to be Assistant Attorney General for the Antitrust Division (AAG-Antitrust).
    Key Quotes:
    “President Trump has vowed to use the Justice Department to advance his own interests and to seek ‘retribution’ against ‘the enemy within.’”
    “The Trump Administration already purged dozens of senior career leaders at the Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigation… And, the Administration has forced career law enforcement officers to retire, resign, or be fired simply for executing tasks that were assigned to them. These actions are nakedly partisan.”
    “Many members on the Democratic side of the aisle expressed fears that Attorney General Pam Bondi would put her loyalty to the President ahead of anything else. Our fears have been realized.”
    “On her first day as Attorney General, Pam Bondi issued 14 memos to Department of Justice staff that reflect the most extreme of President Trump’s priorities, including far-right Project 2025 policies. Attorney General Bondi established a ‘Weaponization Working Group’ that is a clear effort to make good on her pledge to ‘investigate the investigators.’”
    “Given the political retribution that is already being carried out with the blessing of the President at the Justice Department, Mr. Blanche’s nomination deserves heightened scrutiny. If confirmed, he will serve as the second-in-command at the Department, overseeing the day-to-day operations.”
    “With Ms. Bondi’s unyielding loyalty to President Trump already disclosed, we must ask ourselves whether Mr. Blanche would be willing to act as an independent voice within the Department’s leadership.”
    “Mr. Blanche, I enjoyed meeting with you in my office… You told me repeatedly that your true loyalty is to the rule of law. That’s the right answer from my point of view. But I am afraid I need to ask you more to conclude that you would be able to arise to the occasion which is likely to present itself.”
    “What is happening at the Federal Bureau of Investigation should give Republicans and Democrats pause. That great agency is entrusted with the safety and security of the United States of America. Making it political does not help.”
    Video of Durbin’s opening statement is available here.
    Audio of Durbin’s opening statement is available here.
    Footage of Durbin’s opening statement is available here for TV Stations.
    -30-

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Duckworth Holds Senate Floor to Protest HHS Nominee Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Underscores How RFK’s Extreme Views Would Endanger the Health of Millions of Middle-Class Americans

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Illinois Tammy Duckworth

    February 12, 2025

    [WASHINGTON, D.C.] – Today, U.S. Senator Tammy Duckworth (D-IL) joined Senate Democrats’ protest opposing Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s nomination to serve as the Director of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) under President Trump. In her remarks, Duckworth underscored just how unqualified Kennedy is for the job and how his long-held, well-established extreme views would put programs and services that millions of middle-class Americans rely on—like Medicaid—at risk. Video of Duckworth’s full speech can be found on the Senator’s YouTube, Twitter/X and Facebook.

    Key quotes:

    • “Next month will mark the five-year anniversary of when COVID shut down our nation. In this moment, it is dangerous, reckless and heartless to everyone who lost a loved one in the pandemic to even consider nominating a guy who has stated that, quote, ‘no vaccine is safe and effective.’ And if our HHS Secretary refuses to ensure children are protected against preventable-yet-deadly diseases—like measles, RSV, whooping cough or polio—it will be our kids, not Mr. Kennedy, who pay the price.”
    • “The only reason Kennedy is even up for confirmation is because he, like Elon Musk, decided to throw his dignity to the wind and bow down at Trump’s altar. And because of that, he gets to be yet another rich guy with too few qualifications and too much power somehow now charged with leading our government… So why would any of us ever think that he’d have the courage to stand up to Trump if the President issues an order that actively harms everyday Americans? How could any of us actually believe that Kennedy would fight back against Trump’s worst instincts, when Kennedy has proven time and again that he believes more in sycophancy than science?”
    • “Americans are going be the ones to suffer. Because now, with Kennedy’s confirmation, even programs as popular, effective and vital as Medicaid will be in even greater danger… Medicaid is a lifeline for kids, pregnant women, people in nursing homes and Americans with disabilities. But Republicans don’t seem to care about any of that. It’s obvious that Donald Trump has never stayed up late at night hunched over the kitchen table, with a calculator in one hand and a medical bill in the other, praying to figure out a way to afford his child’s insulin.”
    • “To my colleagues on the other side of the aisle: I am sure many of you have faced health crises of your own. I’m sure many of you have had a parent who’s been sick or a nephew who’s been in a car crash, a spouse who’s needed an emergency C-section or a child who’s relied on an autoimmune injector. Imagine if your loved one hadn’t had care they could rely on in that moment. Then ask yourself how you can sleep soundly tonight if you vote to further the agenda of a couple rich guys who so clearly don’t care about making America healthy—they only care about tipping it even more in favor of the wealthy. They’re not bringing back the good ole days of Reagan. They’re just bringing back the days of dying from the measles. And they’re certainly not making America great again. They’re making America sick again. That’s the Trump-Kennedy promise.”

    Duckworth’s opening remarks as prepared below:

    You know, if you go back exactly 20 years ago today, I could tell you exactly where I was. I was in Walter Reed Medical Center. I was staring at the beige colored walls. And amidst the pain in every inch of my body, I was trying to muster the strength to sit up, or to take a step, or even just to take a breath.

    I spent months and months and months in that room. Hooked up to machines, getting wheeled in and out of surgeries, learning how to live again in my new, post-shootdown world. But despite it all, looking back, I consider every one of those days in that hospital room lucky.

    Because when the worst happened to me—when that RPG exploded in my lap in Iraq and I needed serious, sustained medical attention to survive the hour, the day, the year—I had health care I could rely on.

    The same cannot be said for countless Americans.

    Americans whose health care costs have already been too high, and whose access to care is in even greater danger if this Chamber is foolish enough to confirm Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as our next Secretary of HHS. Put simply, Mr. Kennedy cannot be trusted with the grave, grave responsibility that comes with this job.

    He cannot be trusted with our lives. He is focused on pushing his agenda—regardless of the cost to middle-class Americans. And if this man is confirmed, more Americans will die preventable deaths because of his policies.

    Next month will mark the five-year anniversary of when COVID shut down our nation. In this moment, it is dangerous, reckless and heartless to everyone who lost a loved one in the pandemic to even consider nominating a guy who has stated that, quote, “no vaccine is safe and effective.”

    And if our HHS Secretary refuses to ensure children are protected against preventable-yet-deadly diseases—like measles, RSV, whooping cough or polio—it will be our kids, not Mr. Kennedy, who pay the price.

    I’ve gotten letter after letter from my constituents, begging me to try to reason with my colleagues, to do whatever I can to prevent a man so ignorant of all things science and medicine from holding a position of such power over our child’s next breath.

    One pediatrician from Illinois wrote to me: I will always remember the 9-month-old infant with whooping cough who could not be saved despite every high-tech ventilator and medication we had available.” Another said: “I recall a father screaming and punching a hole in the wall when his 4-year-old son died of chicken pox.” The stories, the letters, the avoidable tragedies go on and on. Imagine how much worse the heartbreak will become under a guy who acts like the term “vaccine” is a swear word.

    Look, the only reason Kennedy is even up for confirmation is because he, like Elon Musk, decided to throw his dignity to the wind and bow down at Trump’s altar.

    And because of that, he gets to be yet another rich guy with too few qualifications and too much power, somehow now charged with leading our government.

    Trump is running this country like the mob: Kiss his ring, pledge your unyielding loyalty, get made—it’s just this time, you get made into a Cabinet Secretary. Well, Kennedy has given Trump his fealty.  So why would any of us ever think that he’d have the courage to stand up to Trump if the President issues an order that actively harms everyday Americans?  How could any of us actually believe that Kennedy would fight back against Trump’s worst instincts, when Kennedy has proven time and again that he believes more in sycophancy than science?

    Now, Americans are going be the ones to suffer. Because now, with Kennedy’s confirmation, even programs as popular, effective and vital as Medicaid will be in even greater danger. Republicans told us in Project 2025 that they would come for Medicaid—and this is the rare case when the GOP has actually kept its word, putting at risk the roughly 80 million Americans who rely on it. Americans in red states and blue, in big cities and small towns—folks who may have never heard of RFK Jr., but who will certainly feel the effect when he rips away the care their family so desperately needs.

    Medicaid is a lifeline for kids, for pregnant women, for people in nursing homes, for Americans with disabilities. But Republican’s don’t seem to care about any of that. It’s obvious that Donald Trump has never stayed up late at night hunched over the kitchen table, with a calculator in one hand and a medical bill in the other, praying to figure out a way to afford his child’s insulin.

    No. Of course not.

    With every passing day, it becomes clearer and clearer that Republicans care more about tax breaks for the billionaires they pal around with on the golf course than prescriptions for the middle-class folks who actually work at Mar-a-Lago.

    And while that teacher in Peoria lays awake at night, trying to work out how she can afford her father’s home care now that he can no longer get those services through Medicaid… While that new mom in Chicago who’s just learned she has stage 3 cancer is trying to find a second job so she can afford both diapers for her newborn and her own chemotherapy… Donald Trump and Elon Musk will be too busy lining their already-full pockets to care.

    To my colleagues on the other side of the aisle: I am sure many of you have faced health crises of your own. I’m sure many of you have had a parent who’s been sick or a nephew who’s been in a car crash… a spouse who’s needed an emergency C-section or a child who’s relied on an autoimmune injector. Imagine if your loved one hadn’t had care they could rely on in that moment.

    Then ask yourself how you can sleep soundly tonight if you vote to further the agenda of a couple rich guys who so clearly don’t care about making America healthy—they only care about tipping it even more in favor of the wealthy. They’re not bringing back the good ole days of Reagan. They’re just bringing back the days of dying from the measles.

    And they’re certainly not making America great again. They’re making America sick again. That’s the Trump-Kennedy promise.

    I care about my constituents’ ability to afford their prescription meds. Their ability to get the vaccines that’ll keep them alive through the next pandemic. Their ability to survive those worst-case-scenario health moments without going broke in the process.

    So for all those reasons and a thousand more, I will be voting no on Robert F. Kennedy Jr’s nomination. If my Republican colleagues care about any one of those things, too, then they will have no choice but to do the same. Thank you.

    -30-

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Government unveils plans for next generation of new towns

    Source: United Kingdom – Government Statements

    Hundreds of thousands of working people and families will reap the rewards new towns across Britain, as the Prime Minister paves the way for the largest housebuilding programme since the post-war era.

    • Over 100 sites across England have come forward to be considered for next generation of new towns
    • Government on track to create beautiful communities, provide affordable homes, and deliver much needed infrastructure, including schools and nurseries, GP surgeries, and bus routes 
    • By taking on the blockers, 20,000 homes, along with new schools and health facilities, will move forward following government action, and we will now turn to unblock the remaining 700,000 homes across 350 sites 
    • Comes as government rolls out major planning reforms to sweep away the blockers and push through its housebuilding agenda as part of the Plan for Change

    Hundreds of thousands of working people and families will reap the rewards new towns across Britain, as the Prime Minister paves the way for the largest housebuilding programme since the post-war era.

    Visiting a housing development today, the Prime Minister will unveil the government’s plans for the next generation of new towns – well-designed, beautiful communities with affordable housing, GP surgeries, schools and public transport where people will want to live. 

    Over 100 proposals from across every region in England were submitted, showing local areas and housebuilders’ ambition to get on board to build the next generation of new towns – playing their part in getting Britain building and tackling the worst housing crisis in living memory. Every new town will have the potential to deliver 10,000 homes or more. 

    Delivering security is central to this government’s Plan for Change, because the least working people deserve when they graft hard is a secure home. That’s why the government is providing much-needed housing in the right places with the right infrastructure, and the New Towns Taskforce has today set clear principles on what the next generation of new towns will deliver: affordable housing, vital infrastructure and access to open green spaces and nature, to transform the lives of working people. 

    Prime Minister Keir Starmer said:

    For so many families, homeownership is a distant dream. After a decade of decline in housebuilding, the impact is a disconnect between working hard and getting on.

    This is about more than just bricks and mortar. It’s about the security and stability that owning your own home brings. I know what this means for working people – the roof above our head was everything for our family growing up. 

    We’ve already made progress in just seven months, unblocking 20,000 stuck homes. But there’s more to do.

    We’re urgently using all levers available to build the homes we need so more families can get on the housing ladder. We’re sweeping aside the blockers to get houses built, no longer accepting no as the default answer, and paving the way for the next generation of new towns.

    As part of the largest housebuilding programme since the post-war era, our ambitious Plan for Change will transform the lives of working people, once again connecting the basic principle that if you work hard, you should get on.

    Deputy Prime Minister and Secretary of State for Housing, Angela Rayner said:  

    Time and again we are seeing too many new homes stuck or stalled that not only act as a barrier to growth but also has real-world consequences for working people and families who see homeownership as nothing more than a distant dream.  

    I will not run away from the tough choices to fix the housing crisis we inherited that has left thousands of families on housing waiting lists, allowed homelessness to spiral out of control, and stopped an entire generation from picking up the keys to their first home.  

    While our vision for the next generation of new towns is setting the stage for a housebuilding revolution in the years to come, urgent action is needed now to build the homes and infrastructure that our local communities are crying out for. That’s why our New Homes Accelerator is working at pace to find solutions and remove blockages in the system, executing long-lasting solutions to get spades in the ground.  

    Today we are embarking on the next chapter in our Plan for Change to build 1.5 million new homes, deliver the biggest boost in social and affordable housing in a generation, and raise living standards for working people and families across the country.

    For far too long, working people have been let down by a decline in housebuilding. That’s why the government is rolling up its sleeves and is taking on the blockers with major reforms to planning regulation to get Britain building. 

    That work is already underway, with a staggering 20,000 new homes now successfully unblocked by the government’s novel ‘New Homes Accelerator’ programme, which deploys planning expertise to speed up the delivery of housing sites held by unnecessary delays.  

    Areas that have already benefitted from direct government action include:

    • Over 1,000 homes unlocked at Cowley Hill in Liverpool, where an agreement has been reached with the Environment Agency who withdrew its previous objections on both flood risk and biodiversity grounds, subject to planning.
    • And at Wolborough in Devon, the Accelerator has worked with Natural England to help accelerate this development, whilst ensuring environmental improvements are secured. On top of the 1,100 homes the site is injecting £1.75 million towards off-site pedestrian and cycle improvements, playing pitches, bus services and a local travel plan.  

    Housebuilders and local councils have put forward over 350 housing development sites stuck in the system under the previous government – that together could unlock around 700,000 new homes.

    Around a quarter of sites submitted are already receiving government attention since the call for evidence closed in October – demonstrating success of the programme, and local ambition to support the government’s 1.5 million homes target.

    This goes hand-in-hand with government action to overhaul the planning system, supporting the builders and not the blockers, taking the brakes off economic growth, raising living standards, and making the tough decisions to deliver for working people and families. 

    This includes:

    • Publishing a new growth-focused National Planning Policy Framework, which introduced new mandatory for councils to deliver the right homes in the right places, with a combined total of 370,000 homes a year.
    • Introducing the Planning and Infrastructure Bill next month. The Bill will overhaul environmental regulations to no longer accept the failed status quo where bats are more important than trains or newts more important than homes, and remove blockers to fast-track delivery of the homes and infrastructure that local communities need.    

    To get Britain building now – the government today announces plans to fast stream planning through brokering disagreements between the agencies and expert bodies, which by law must be consulted within the planning process. Bodies including National Highways, Natural England and the Environment Agency will need to bring planners and housebuilders to the table and iron out concerns that have been holding back development.

    Responding to sector concerns on pinch points, work stepping up with the Building Safety Regulator to ensure greater timeliness and efficiency when new tall buildings are signed off – to provide more homes for more people.

    This work will be bolstered by extra government funding announced today, including:  

    • £1 million for government agencies, including National Highways, Natural England and the Environment Agency, to speed up the planning approval of new homes and improve feedback to local authorities and industry where required.

    • £2 million to support the Building Safety Regulator to continue improving the processing for new-build applications.

    • Over £3 million of grants for local councils to bolster planning capacity, alongside direct advice and navigate through some of the more complex issues holding up new development.   

    Alongside the Accelerator, the government is also supporting local partners through a clearing service to help accelerate the sale of uncontracted and unsold affordable homes, with nearly 300 housebuilders, local councils and registered providers signing up in the first 50 days of its launch.   

    In December, the government set a clear hierarchy of brownfield first, grey belt second and green belt third. Today, further funding is being injected to drive regeneration and brownfield deliver in the following areas:  

    • £20 million to help transform neglected small-scale council-owned sites into new homes, for areas most in need.

    • Nearly £30 million from the Brownfield Infrastructure and Land Fund in Bradford to transform derelict brownfield sites into a vibrant residential area with 1,000 new homes, three community parks, shops, cafés, restaurants, and offices.

    • £1.5 million to support a regeneration programme at Manchester Victoria North, delivering a new district of 15,000 homes with transport links and green spaces.   

    Getting homes built for working people is a priority and is backed by investment in housing which is increasing to £5 billion for this year, including a top-up of £800 million being injected into the existing Affordable Homes Programme to help deliver tens of thousands of new affordable and social homes across the country.   

    This is in addition to an extra £100 million of cash to bolster local resources with increased planning fees to cover costs and funding to recruit 300 planning officers, making sure councils have the capacity they need to rubberstamp new homes and infrastructure.

    Updates to this page

    Published 13 February 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: New industry bonus opens to support good jobs and low carbon manufacturing factories

    Source: United Kingdom – Government Statements

    Industrial heartlands and coastal areas will receive a major economic boost as the government backs renewable energy firms investing in industrial communities.

    • Government launches new investment to support clean energy manufacturing, and highly skilled jobs in industrial towns and cities
    • offshore wind developers can now bid for financial support if they drive investment in UK’s most deprived regions, build low carbon factories, or support net zero supply chains
    • the bonus will kickstart growth and support good jobs – delivering the mission to become a clean energy superpower through the government’s Plan for Change

    Industrial heartlands and coastal areas will receive a major economic boost as the government backs renewable energy firms investing in industrial communities – backing good jobs through the government’s Plan for Change

    The application window has opened for the Clean Industry Bonus, which provides financial support for offshore wind developers, on the condition they prioritise their investment in areas that need it most, including traditional oil and gas communities – supporting highly skilled jobs such as engineers, electricians or welders.

    The support also rewards developers who build more sustainable low carbon factories, offshore wind blades, cables and ports to reduce industrial emissions across the clean energy supply chain.

    By encouraging developers to use less polluting suppliers, the bonus will help tackle the climate crisis while also addressing supply chain blockages in renewable technologies driven by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine – supporting industry on the transition to clean, secure, homegrown energy that Britain controls.

    The UK produces more offshore wind than any other European country, making it the backbone for plans to deliver a clean power system by 2030 and become a clean energy superpower. This bonus will help accelerate the drive for clean power – incentivising developers to build the infrastructure the country needs to end reliance on unstable fossil fuel markets and help keep energy bills down for good.   

    Since July, the government has seen £34.8 billion of private investment into UK’s clean energy industries. In November, the government launched its carbon capture and storage industry supporting 4,000 jobs in the North West and Teesside. ScottishPower awarded a £1 billion turbine contract for its East Anglia TWO offshore windfarm to Siemens Gamesa, including blade production at its Hull blade factory – the company employ over 1,300 people in Humberside.

    Energy Secretary Ed Miliband said:   

    We are backing our proud manufacturing, coastal and oil and gas communities with good jobs, skills and private sector investment – delivering on the government’s Plan for Change.

    This is our clean energy superpower mission in action, kickstarting growth, delivering energy security and transforming towns and cities as part of the transition – from the ports of Nigg and Leith to the manufacturing hubs of Blyth and Hull. 

    Steve Foxley, Chief Executive of the Offshore Renewable Energy (ORE) Catapult, said: 

    This news is an important signal from government to industry of intent to grow our offshore wind sector in a way that benefits both our climate and our economy, supporting expansive regional job creation and bolstering national energy security.  

    Alongside innovating to develop next-generation technologies, delivering the right levels of future deployment and fulfilling the ambitions of the Industrial Growth Plan for offshore wind, it will drive up confidence in our ability to secure the clean investments we need in the years to come.

    Dan McGrail, CEO of RenewableUK, said:  

    The offshore wind industry already employs over 34,000 people in the UK, but there’s an opportunity to treble this number by the end of the decade if we grow the sector’s supply chain. Government initiatives like the Clean Industry Bonus, coupled with industry initiatives to support innovation and the upcoming Industrial Strategy, could drive hundreds of millions of pounds of private investment into new manufacturing. 

    Whilst we’re right to focus on securing investment in manufacturing new turbine foundations, blades and cables, we shouldn’t forget that there are also thousands of jobs in the construction and maintenance of wind farms too. You can go to places across the country like Grimsby and Great Yarmouth and Buckie on the Moray Firth and see boats full of engineers ensuring our wind farms operate at maximum efficiency. 

    Dhara Vyas, Energy UK, Chief Executive, said:  

    Offshore wind is set to become the backbone of a decarbonised power system. To build an industry that is resilient to supply chain challenges, we need a framework that supports sustainable deployment, while fostering investment in the UK’s industrial heartlands. 

    The Clean Industry Bonus will help to unlock economic growth, create job opportunities, and maintain the UK’s position as a global leader in offshore wind. 

    Alongside the development of a broader industrial strategy, the Clean Industry Bonus will play an important role in strengthening the Contracts for Difference mechanism. Clarity will be critical in ensuring we can deliver Allocation Round 7, which is likely to be the single most important auction to achieving the Clean Power goal.

    The UK is already home to the world’s first floating offshore wind farm and has the highest deployment of offshore wind in Europe. As a result, the UK’s offshore wind industry is supporting thousands of highly skilled jobs across the country. 

    This latest boost for renewable developers comes after the government delivered the most successful renewables auction round in history last year, securing contracts for Europe’s largest and second largest offshore wind farm projects. 

    The bonus will come with an initial £27 million per gigawatt of offshore wind projects. That means if developers commit to 7-8 GW of offshore wind, up to £200 million of funding could be made available. 

    Funding will be allocated competitively with the results announced by the Energy Secretary in the summer.

    Notes to editors

    The Clean Industry Bonus will apply to all offshore wind projects bidding for funding through this year’s renewable energy auction, Allocation Round 7 of the Contracts for Difference scheme, which is the main mechanism for securing clean energy infrastructure for Britain. September’s auction secured 5 GW for offshore wind, enough to power the equivalent of around 8 million homes.

    The funding will come through the government’s Contract for Difference mechanism. The scheme is designed to protect billpayers from high costs with the lowest price bids successful, ensuring value for money.

    Updates to this page

    Published 13 February 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI USA: VA Announces New Flag Display Policy

    Source: US Department of Veterans Affairs

    Skip to content

    WASHINGTON — The Department of Veterans Affairs today instituted a new flag policy limiting the display of certain flags on VA premises. The policy will establish consistent and clear guidance across the department and among all employees.

    The policy, which can be viewed here, outlines a list of flags — in addition to the American flag — that may be displayed at VA facilities.

    VA’s new guidance follows a longstanding Department of Defense policy instituted during the first Trump Administration and kept in place during the Biden Administration.

    “This policy will bring consistency and simplicity to the display of flags throughout the department, which now has a singular focus: serving the needs of Veterans, their families, caregivers and survivors,” said VA Secretary Doug Collins.

    Reporters and media outlets with questions or comments should contact the Office of Media Relations at vapublicaffairs@va.gov

    Veterans with questions about their health care and benefits (including GI Bill). Questions, updates and documents can be submitted online.

    Contact us online through Ask VA

    Veterans can also use our chatbot to get information about VA benefits and services. The chatbot won’t connect you with a person, but it can show you where to go on VA.gov to find answers to some common questions.

    Learn about our chatbot and ask a question

    Subscribe today to receive these news releases in your inbox.

    Page load link

    Go to Top

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: AKT Trading Inc. Recalls Seasoned Bamboo Shoots Because of Possible Health Risk

    Source: US Department of Health and Human Services – 3

    Summary

    Company Announcement Date:
    FDA Publish Date:
    Product Type:
    Food & Beverages
    Foodborne Illness
    Reason for Announcement:

    Recall Reason Description

    Potential Foodborne Illness – Botulism

    Company Name:
    AKT Trading Inc.
    Brand Name:

    Brand Name(s)

    CHOSHIYA

    Product Description:

    Product Description

    Menma Ajitsuke Prepared Bamboo Shoot


    Company Announcement

    AKT Trading Inc of Torrance, California is recalling 120 packages of Menma Ajitsuke Prepared Bamboo Shoot Product, because it has the potential to be contaminated with Clostridium botulinum, a bacterium which can cause life-threatening illness or death. Consumers are warned not to use the product even if it does not look or smell spoiled.

    Botulism, a potentially fatal form of food poisoning, can cause the following symptoms: general weakness, dizziness, double-vision and trouble with speaking or swallowing. Difficulty in breathing, weakness of other muscles, abdominal distension and constipation may also be common symptoms. People experiencing these problems should seek immediate medical attention.

    The bamboo shoot product was distributed at Tokyo Central Costa Mesa store in Costa Mesa, California.

    The affected product is packaged in a plastic bag and can be identified by the following information:

    • Brand Name: CHOSHIYA
    • Product Name: MENMA AJITSUKE PREPARED BAMBOO SHOOTS
    • Container: 8.8oz plastic bag
    • JANCODE (UPC): 4983673527332
    • Expiration Date: 1/29/2025

    No illnesses have been reported to date.

    This issue was discovered on 1/14/2025 at the Tokyo Central Costa Mesa retail store where the product was found being sold under ambient (non-refrigerated) conditions. The missing “Keep Refrigerated” label likely contributed to this issue. The product was immediately removed from sale at this location. Consumers who have purchased the affected product with the specified expiration date are urged not to consume it. Consumers should discard the product or return it to the place of purchase for a full refund.

    AKT Trading Inc. is committed to the safety and quality of its products and is taking this action out of an abundance of caution. We are cooperating fully with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on this matter.

    Consumers with questions may contact AKT Trading Inc. at 310-715-2174 or info@aktusa.com.

    This recall is being made with the knowledge of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.


    Company Contact Information


    Product Photos

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Uncertainty around PEPFAR program puts millions of people at risk News Feb 12, 2025

    Source: Doctors Without Borders –

    The decision by the US government to temporarily freeze funding to the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) alongside all other foreign aid for at least a 90-day period has had immediate effects on people living with HIV, said Doctors Without Borders/Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) today. Although the US has since clarified that certain treatment programs can continue at least until April, we are concerned that critical elements of the PEPFAR program remain frozen.

    “More than three weeks since the US government froze PEPFAR funding, there is still widespread confusion and uncertainty as to whether this critical lifeline for millions of people has been cut off,” said Avril Benoît, chief executive officer of MSF USA. “Despite a limited waiver covering some activities, what our teams are seeing in many of the countries where we work is that people have already lost access to lifesaving care and have no idea whether or when their treatment will continue. MSF is calling on the US government to immediately resume funding for the full range of PEPFAR operations as well as other critical health and humanitarian aid.”

    On February 1, after over a week of chaos and a freeze of activities, the US government issued a limited waiver allowing for the resumption of some programming with specific guidance for HIV. However, that guidance was unclear, and it did not immediately reach PEPFAR country teams. Across our broad network, MSF did not see a single organization able to resume work as a result of this limited guidance on waivers. On February 6, the US government issued clarified guidance on HIV care and treatment and prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) programs.

    What our teams are seeing in many of the countries where we work is that people have already lost access to lifesaving care and have no idea whether or when their treatment will continue. 

    Avril Benoît, chief executive officer of MSF USA

    However, we remain concerned that key areas of HIV prevention, treatment, care, and support are not included in this additional guidance, such as pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for all vulnerable groups, including LGBTQI+ people and sex workers; specific interventions for adolescent girls and young women in high prevalence countries; and community-led monitoring programs. These services are essential to ensuring a successful response to the epidemic.

    While MSF does not accept US government funding and will not be directly affected by cuts or freezes to PEPFAR, many of our activities are contingent on the programs that have been interrupted. In some places we’ve had to adapt and change our activities and the indirect effects of these freezes have already been felt in our projects in various parts of the world.

    Failure to reauthorize global AIDS program would be catastrophic

    Read more

    In sub-Saharan Africa, where MSF runs several HIV/AIDS and related health programs, we are already witnessing impacts on patients. In South Africa, many clinics providing HIV services, including testing, treatment, and PrEP through PEPFAR-funded organizations have been shuttered, leaving people confused and distressed about where to access their critical medication. In Mozambique, a major partner organization of MSF that provided comprehensive HIV services had to stop activities completely. In Zimbabwe, most organizations providing HIV services have also stopped work, disrupting in particular the DREAMS program aimed at decreasing new HIV infections in adolescent girls and young women.

    “Any interruption to HIV services and treatment is deeply distressing to people in care and an emergency when it comes to HIV treatment,” said Tom Ellman, director of the South Africa Medical Unit at MSF Southern Africa. “HIV medicines must be taken daily or people run the risk of developing resistance or deadly health complications.”

    In Democratic Republic of Congo, the aid freeze was already affecting the most successful model of antiretroviral drug distribution ever implemented in the capital city of Kinshasa: the community-run free distribution and peer support points, known locally as “PODIs.” In a country where stigma against people living with HIV is massive and poverty remains a barrier to care, PODIs have proven to be a medically necessary approach for addressing delays or therapy abandonment. With PEPFAR-supported points of care now closed and other activities frozen, thousands of people were left without support and with a high risk of developing advanced HIV. MSF teams supporting advanced HIV disease care in Kinshasa might not be able to meet the increased demand if disruptions persist.

    In South Sudan, approximately 51 percent of people living with HIV know their status, and 47 percent are on treatment. A discontinuation of this program will have devastating effects on thousands of people and their communities.  MSF has worked alongside PEPFAR providing essential HIV care in this context and has seen firsthand how this program saves lives. The support of PEPFAR in this country is critical.

    These disruptions will cost lives and upend years of progress against this virus. Every day that passes is an emergency for millions of people for whom PEPFAR is a lifeline.

    Avril Benoît, chief executive officer of MSF USA

    PEPFAR-supported programming is deeply interconnected with and reliant on other components of the US foreign aid system, specifically implementation support provided by USAID and technical and other assistance provided by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Given that the foreign aid freeze and stop-work orders continue to affect these other agencies, and staff from these agencies have been put on immediate leave or recalled, it is unclear when and how even the limited activities now allowed will be able to restart.

    “These disruptions will cost lives and upend years of progress against this virus,” said Benoit. “Every day that passes is an emergency for millions of people for whom PEPFAR is a lifeline.”

    PEPFAR-supported programming has been heavily integrated into key aspects of the broader health systems of partner countries over the last 20-plus years and as a result the consequences of these disruptions have been far-reaching. For this reason, some of the services affected go beyond purely HIV treatment and prevention, such as in Uganda, where PEPFAR-funded aspects of infectious disease surveillance and response, including for Ebola virus, have been stopped.

    When MSF first started treating people with HIV/AIDS in South Africa 25 years ago, there were no ARV medicines on the shelves, every diagnosis felt like a death sentence, and communities were desperately trying to curb the virus’ spread.

    Tom Ellman, director of the South Africa Medical Unit at MSF Southern Africa

    “When MSF first started treating people with HIV/AIDS in South Africa 25 years ago, there were no ARV medicines on the shelves, every diagnosis felt like a death sentence, and communities were desperately trying to curb the virus’ spread,” said Ellman.

    Since then, PEPFAR support has helped save more than 25 million lives and encouraged the fight against HIV to be a truly global one. But continued success relies on continued access to the full range of HIV-related programs, services, and goods including prevention services and treatment, population-specific and targeted programs, programs related to gender-based violence, and other critical areas, said MSF.  

    As health care providers, we are deeply concerned by these disruptions to this lifesaving program.

    “Even temporary interruptions to key components of PEPFAR will harm people at risk of acquiring HIV and people living with HIV,” said Benoît. “We urge the US government to immediately resume all funding of critical humanitarian and health aid, including the full range of PEPFAR operations.”

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI USA: Senator King Statement on Vote Against Tulsi Gabbard to Serve as Director of National Intelligence

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Maine Angus King
    WASHINGTON, D.C. — Today, U.S. Senator Angus King (I-ME) released the following statement after voting against Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard to serve as the Director of National Intelligence. Congresswoman Gabbard was confirmed in a vote of 52-48.
    “The Director of National Intelligence position boils down to judgment and management — and I find Congresswoman Gabbard lacking in both of these essential traits.
    “First to the quality of judgment and discernment. While the Congresswoman has demonstrated sometimes justified skepticism towards the work of the American intelligence community, that skepticism appears to wane when it comes to our foes and those posing threats to America’s national security. Consistently, she has taken actions that call into question her judgement in this regard. As a member of Congress, for example, she sought to drop espionage charges against Edward Snowden even though ample evidence was available demonstrating his egregious compromise of the security of our country.
    “In addition, she has consistently opposed the reauthorization of Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, one of the most important tools available to our intelligence community. Although she has recently expressed support for this provision, I find her new-found enthusiasm unconvincing, and without solid administration support — starting with the Office of the Director of National Intelligence — this invaluable capability could be lost.
    “Secondly, while Congresswoman Gabbard has managed an office on Capitol Hill, and other small groups throughout her private sector career, she has not managed a larger body of professionals. While this would not be a deal breaker if she measured up in all other categories, this lack of experience in dealing with large-scale organizations also represents a shortcoming.
    “I thank the Congresswoman for her military service to our nation and I appreciate her willingness to represent the people of her district and make a public contribution. However, she does not get my vote to spearhead America’s efforts to monitor the threats facing Americans and managing the clandestine professionals who serve on the front lines protecting our national security.
    “Since the majority of my colleagues saw her nomination differently, I commit to working with her and providing her any guidance or feedback needed to help her and the intelligence community succeed. The priority here remains keeping Americans safe and our interests protected worldwide.”

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: In Forceful Senate Floor Speech, Murray Lays Out Real Dangers of Confirming RFK Jr., Calls on Colleagues to “Show Some Courage,” Reject Anti-Vaccine Conspiracy Theorist as Top Health Official

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Washington State Patty Murray
    Murray: “If you think RFK Jr. will change who he is, you are lying to yourself… If you do not draw a line somewhere, you will cross every line you could ever imagine. You will be pushed further and further into accepting things you never thought you would—things you never thought you could.”
    ICYMI: In Senate Hearing, RFK Jr. Refuses to Say HPV Vaccine is Safe to Sen. Patty Murray, Pressed on Credible Accusation of Sexual Assault
    Murray, a longtime congressional leader on health care who has led hearings on addressing vaccine hesitancy, has been a leading vocal opponent of RFK Jr.’s nomination—speaking out on the Senate floor, holding events, raising the alarm after meeting with him
    *** VIDEO of Senator Murray’s floor speech HERE***
    Washington, D.C. — Today, U.S. Senator Patty Murray (D-WA), a senior member and former Chair of the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) Committee, took to the Senate floor to warn of the very real dangers that lie ahead if Republicans insist on confirming RFK Jr. as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and urge her colleagues to “show some courage… show some conscience” and vote against this nomination.
    Murray laid out the many ways RFK Jr. could undermine vaccines as HHS Secretary—as well as so much else that’s at stake with his confirmation. Murray pointed out that, if confirmed, there will be nothing stopping RFK Jr. from firing the CDC’s entire vaccine advisory committee—responsible for making recommendations about vaccines and indirectly determines which vaccines must be covered by insurance—and replacing them all with vaccine skeptics. RFK Jr. will also oversee FDA, another agency he has repeatedly tried to discredit and attack—and where he has said he plans to fire hundreds of scientists on Day One.
    “My colleagues should know better. They do know better,” said Murray on the Senate floor. “But they are looking the other way. They are choosing to pretend like it is in any way believable that RFK Jr. won’t use his new power to do exactly the thing he has been trying to do for decades—undermine vaccines.”
    Murray spoke about how RFK Jr. will also have jurisdiction over NIH, where he could redirect funds away from promising cures, or make good on his plan to fire hundreds of researchers and pause infectious disease research. Pointing to Donald Trump and Elon Musk’s’ recent attacks on NIH biomedical research funding, Murray said: “At a time when lifesaving research like this is already under attack from the President and the richest man in the world, no one who truly values medical research should vote to install one of the biggest attackers of medical science as the Secretary of Health and Human Services.”
    Murray also spoke about health insurance—another huge responsibility for HHS. “Last time Trump was in office, we saw millions of people lose their health coverage,” Murray said. “The uninsured rate went up after years of hard-won progress, and we all know he still wants to rip up the Affordable Care Act—driving up costs and kicking people off their coverage. And there’s no reason to think Mr. Kennedy will stand up to that effort. Indeed, there is no reason to think he has the experience and understanding of the system to do so. During his committee hearings, RFK Jr. confused Medicare and Medicaid—basic stuff—and failed to describe the components of Medicare.”
    Murray also hammered how RFK Jr. poses an enormous risk to reproductive health care in America—pointing out that not only did RFK Jr. confess to having no real understanding of the Department’s role in enforcing Americans’ right to emergency care, but he showed he will be totally open to Republicans’ efforts to rip away access to medication abortion nationwide.
    Also noting the danger of putting RFK Jr. in charge of pandemic threats, Murray emphasized that “We cannot take this man at his word—something he has changed and gone back and forth on time and again. But we can take him at his record—which is that he has consistently undermined vaccine confidence and even profited from it.”
    “I cannot tell my colleagues enough: this isn’t a game, this is not a political role without consequence, the Health Secretary has real power over whether Americans can get basic information and care that impacts whether they live or die,” Murray continued.
    “So if my colleagues are feeling the pressure from President Trump or if they are feeling the weight of the richest man in the world on their backs, I would warn them: this will certainly not be the last test we face here in the Senate… If you do not draw a line somewhere, you will cross every line you could ever imagine. You will be pushed further and further into accepting things you never thought you would—things you never thought you could.
    “I think most of my colleagues know what is really at stake here. I think most of my colleagues know what sort of man RFK Jr. is and what sort of damage he could do if confirmed. There are political realities, we all get that—but there is also right and wrong… So, I urge all my colleagues to show some courage. I urge them to show some conscience. I urge them to join me in voting NO on RFK Jr.’s nomination,” Murray concluded.
    When President-elect Donald J. Trump first announced his intention to select Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as Secretary of HHS, Murray immediately and forcefully condemned the move—and she has consistently spoken out and laid out for her colleagues the case against his nomination since, including in a lengthy Senate floor speech earlier this month—VIDEO HERE. Murray met with RFK Jr. on January 15th and released a statement afterward reiterating her opposition to his nomination and urging her colleagues, “to be honest with themselves about the stakes of putting one of the anti-vaccine movement’s loudest, proudest champions in charge of HHS and join me in opposing RFK Jr.’s nomination.” In December, Murray held a roundtable discussion at UW Medicine on the importance of scientific research and vaccines—especially for children—and spoke about how having RFK Jr. lead HHS would threaten Americans’ health and safety. At the hearing on his nomination before the Senate HELP Committee, Senator Murray pressed RFK Jr. to acknowledge that the HPV vaccine was safe and effective—he would not—and respond to credible accusations of sexual assault.
    As a longtime appropriator and former Chair of the Senate HELP Committee, Murray has long fought to boost biomedical research, strengthen public health infrastructure, and make health care more affordable and accessible. Over her years as a senior member of the Appropriations Committee, she has secured billions of dollars in increases for biomedical research at the National Institutes of Health, and during her time as Chair of the HELP Committee she established the new ARPA-H research agency as part of her PREVENT Pandemics Act to advance some of the most cutting-edge research in the field. As Chair of the HELP Committee, Murray was also instrumental in crafting the American Rescue Plan Act, including its landmark investments in public health and health care. Senator Murray was also the lead Democratic negotiator of the bipartisan 21st Century Cures Act, which delivered a major federal investment to boost NIH research, among many other investments. Murray is also the lead sponsor of the Public Health Infrastructure Saves Lives Act (PHISLA), legislation to establish $4.5 billion in dedicated, annual funding for a grant program to build up and maintain the nation’s public health system across the board. 
    In 2019, Senator Murray co-led a bipartisan hearing in the HELP Committee on vaccine hesitancy and spoke about the importance of addressing vaccine skepticism and getting people the facts they need to keep their families and communities safe and healthy. Ahead of the hearing, as multiple states were facing measles outbreaks in under-vaccinated areas, Murray sent a bipartisan letter with former HELP Committee Chair Lamar Alexander (R-TN) pressing the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Director and HHS Assistant Secretary for Health on their efforts to promote vaccination and vaccine confidence.
    Senator Murray’s full remarks on the Senate floor, as delivered are below and HERE:
    “Mr. President, the American people are watching now with alarm—because the vast majority of people know: vaccines are safe, they’re effective, they are lifesaving.
    But we are now on the verge of confirming, as our nation’s highest health official, a man who has spent considerable time, money, and effort undermining that basic fact.
    “A man who has abused his platform by refusing to acknowledge the well-established science that shows that vaccines arenot linked to autism. Fear about that point—fueled by RFK Jr. and others peddling misinformation—is a leading reason that parents do not get their kids vaccinated against preventable, dangerous diseases.
    “That’s why elevating a man like RFK Jr. to lead HHS would be so dangerous. Just giving him any platform to spread vaccine doubt is dangerous. But to give him one of the biggest megaphones in the world? It is truly shameful that we even are debating this.
    “My colleagues should know better. They actually do know better. They are looking the other way. They are choosing to pretend like it is in any way believable that RFK Jr. won’t use his new power to do exactly the thing he has been trying to do for decades—undermine vaccines.
    “Never mind the fact that CDC has already modified webpages with information about vaccines and other vital public health information—which a federal judge has now ordered the Trump Administration to restore.
    “Never mind that the Trump administration is also, reportedly, planning widespread and significant layoffs—layoffs—at CDC and across HHS.
    “This is how RFK Jr. substitutes his own beliefs for science. So, when the vaccine conspiracies start swirling—and RFK Jr. turns HHS into ground zero for misinformation—‘I had no idea’ is not going to be an excuse for confirming him.
    “Because at the HELP Committee hearing, the Chair pressed him repeatedly about the debunked claim that vaccines cause autism. And when RFK Jr. said he needed to ‘see the evidence,’ he was shown the evidence. But, to no one’s surprise, he did not keep his word, admit he’d been wrong, and spread the good news that vaccines do not cause autism.
    “He has had two weeks since that hearing to look at the same settled science as everyone else—crickets. But he won’t hesitate to quote the latest anti-vax conspiracy. He is totally up to speed on that front.
    “Are my colleagues really buying this guy will take an impartial look at the science?
    “If you think RFK Jr. will change who he is, you are lying to yourself. He has given no evidence to suggest that—and all the evidence in the world to the contrary.
    “Given his long, and growing track record, we cannot just pretend if RFK Jr. finally gets power to undermine vaccines—a cause that he has dedicated a considerable amount of time and effort to—that he’ll just give it up. That is not believable.
    “And I know I’ve been talking a lot about vaccines—because it is so obviously alarming—but the responsibility he would have goes far beyond that.
    “So, let’s break some of this down—both the ways he could undermine vaccines as HHS Secretary, and the other responsibilities that would be at stake.
    “To start with, the CDC is under HHS. That means that the Secretary directly appoints people to CDC’s vaccine advisory board. That board is responsible for making recommendations about vaccines—and it is those recommendations that determine whether or not certain vaccines have to be covered by insurance.
    “So, simply put: changing those recommendations will change what vaccines millions of Americans, including kids, will be able to get from their health care provider.
    “If he is confirmed, there would be nothing stopping RFK Jr. from firing the entire board and replacing them all with vaccine skeptics.
    “After all, he has said many times, and in many ways, he thinks CDC is corrupt and bought by pharma—as usual, by the way, without any evidence.
    “RFK. Jr. would also oversee the Food and Drug Administration; that is another agency he has repeatedly tried to discredit and attack—where he says he plans to fire—fire!—hundreds of scientists on Day One. And an agency that plays the crucial role of making sure our drugs and our treatments—including vaccines—are safe and effective.
    “Not only would Mr. Kennedy have a key perch from which he could undermine vaccines on a scale like never seen before, he could also use his platform to peddle quack treatments with no basis in science.
    “RFK Jr. would also have jurisdiction over NIH. That alone means influence over billions of dollars in medical research—research that is responsible for a significant portion of our economy, and more importantly, research that patients are desperately hoping will help them find cures. 
    “But RFK Jr. could redirect those funds to promote his favorite pet conspiracies instead of promising cures.
    “Or he could make good on his plan to fire hundreds of researchers and pause infectious disease research—for eight years. It should go without saying: viruses aren’t going to take a break.
    “And here’s the thing—the attacks on medical research are now already happening under Trump. From his day one Executive Orders, President Trump has already been threatening medical research.
    “Suddenly, all of our grants are at risk because they are looking at addressing ‘barriers to care’ or understanding why Black and Native American women have higher maternal death rates.
    “And now—President Trump also is trying to illegally, arbitrarily, and suddenly change NIH guidelines to set an unrealistically low cap on indirect cost rates. That would mean researchers are laid off, studies canceled—including lifesaving clinical trials—and kids are not able to get the treatment they need.
    “All because President Trump and Elon Musk don’t seem to understand how we actually fund important research, and couldn’t even be bothered to find out before taking an axe to medical research labs.
    “At a time when lifesaving research like this is already under attack from the President, and the richest man in the world, no one who truly values medical research should vote to install one of the biggest attackers of medical science as the Secretary of Health and Human Services.
    “And, M. President, insurance is another huge portfolio for HHS. Last time Trump was in office, we saw millions of people lose their health care coverage. The uninsured rate went up after years of hard-won progress, and we all know he still wants to rip up the Affordable Care Act—which will drive up costs and kick people off their coverage.
    “There’s no reason to think Mr. Kennedy will stand up to that effort. Indeed, there is no reason to think he has the experience and understanding of the system to actually do so.
    “During his committee hearings, RFK Jr. confused Medicare and Medicaid—this is basic stuff! He failed to describe the components of Medicare. 
    “And yes, Mr. President, I also absolutely have to talk about abortion care. This is of grave importance—especially right now.
    “In his hearings, not only did RFK Jr. confess to having no real understanding of EMTALA—that is a law which requires patients have access to lifesaving emergency care including, in some cases, abortion care—he also showed that he will be totally open to Republicans’ fact-free efforts to rip away access to medication abortion.
    “Like so many other issues that RFK Jr. is simply wrong about, the science on that has been settled for many years now.
    “Mr. Kennedy made clear though, he is very open to revisiting access to the abortion pill, based on a Republican argument against the science that basically boils down to: ‘Nuh uh, nuh uh!’
    “Putting up barriers to accessing the abortion pill—or ripping it off the market completely, as Republicans have made very clear they want to do—would be absolutely devastating.
    “And let’s not forget about pandemic threats. The lies that RFK Jr. spread during the last pandemic already make clear he is not the man to do this job. But if that weren’t enough, when there was a pandemic threat response planning session for this new Administration—he skipped it! He didn’t go! It would almost be comical if this wasn’t so serious.
    “Mr. President, everywhere you look, everything about this nominee is so concerning.
    “We cannot take this man at his word—something he has changed and gone back and forth on time and time again. But we can take him on his record—which is that he has consistently undermined vaccine confidence and, by the way, note: he even profited from that.
    “And we can take the threat of what he might do seriously, especially given the alarming things that are already happening.
    “If RFK Jr. gives you his word of honor, that he won’t freeze research—well guess what? We are already seeing the Trump Administration totally upend medical research. Thanks to the Trump funding freeze, NIH hasn’t issued any grant awards in weeks!
    “If RFK Jr. swears that he is not going to take down information about vaccines, that he is not going to silence experts, well don’t look now—but the Trump Administration has already taken down or changed CDC pages about vaccines. They have already silenced public health experts.
    “If RFK Jr. pinky promises you that he won’t undermine medical science or studies, and he won’t ignore global health threats, well, you might want to sit down for this—but President Trump has completely demolished our global health aid work. He has already completely demolished it.
    “The fallout is utterly heart wrenching. Already we know of a woman who died—because the USAID-supported hospital she went to for oxygen was forced to discharge her because they got a ‘stop-work’ order from the Trump administration.
    “It is not clear if she was the first death caused by Trump’s complete freeze, but there is no question, she will not be the last.
    “And Mr. President—let me make a really important point here: it is not just people across the world who will be affected by this.
    “There was a study being done on a new HIV treatment with thousands of volunteers, a study being done already having a thousand volunteers doing the treatment. But now, without their regular injections, which are cut off because of Trump’s move, there is going to be too little of the drug in their system to protect those people from HIV—but enough of the drug that if they contract HIV, it could mutate to become drug resistant.
    “So, for all the absolutely unhinged conspiracies we have heard about medical research from RFK Jr. and the like, where is the concern for this actual risk, in this actual study, happening right now all because President Trump cut off foreign assistance?
    “RFK Jr. has been silent about that risk, silent about how wrong that is—and so, even as he is making these empty promises on one hand to some of our colleagues, he is already standing by as President Trump breaks them on the other hand.
    “Oh, and here’s one more—if RFK Jr. says he is going to consult you on health care personnel, please do not be fooled.
    “Look, I don’t know why my colleagues need me to tell them this—I like to think we have some pretty smart people around here—but this vote, RFK Jr.’s own nomination, this is your consultation on health care personnel. Not some made up promise for later. This is the point you have the most power.
    “Whatever he might say, you don’t get to choose who RFK Jr. will appoint to this or that—heck, he doesn’t get to choose who President Trump appoints. 
    “The decision you get to make, all of us on this floor get to make, is the decision on this floor before us right now. You get to choose who you vote to confirm. And you will have to live with that decision.
    “And, if you ignore the warning signs, and confirm RFK Jr.—then, when the wheels fall off the wagon, you may try to tell yourself you were lied to, but you knew who you were dealing with. You knew who you were dealing with. You knew what he has said before, and what he has refused to say.
    “You had all the knowledge you needed to do the right thing.
    “I cannot tell my colleagues enough: this is not a game, this is not a political role without consequence. The Health Secretary has real power over whether Americans can get basic information and care that impacts whether they live or die.
    “As I have tried to drive home throughout this process—vaccines save lives. That is not a question. It is not a slogan. It is a fact.
    “If, when parents look to you, worried about their newborn, wanting to do what is best for their baby, and trusting your advice as a public health leader—if you cannot tell them the same truth that centuries of science and experience tells us, which is that vaccines are safe, effective, and lifesaving, then you have absolutely no business leading the Department of Health and Human Services. None. 
    “And so, just as I did at the hearing, I want to warn all of my colleagues: by merely voting to confirm Mr. Kennedy, we would be telling our constituents he is worth listening to on vaccines. That alone will get people killed—before he even lifts a finger.
    “Because he does not even need the levers of power to get people killed—all he needs is a megaphone.
    “To affirm his views by voting to confirm him as our highest health official—let’s not mince words about what that will mean.
    “When babies die from whooping cough because parents weren’t sure the vaccine was safe—will you be able to look them in the eye? When the flu sweeps our nursing homes, when measles sweeps through our communities—will it be worth it?
    “Mr. President, I will end on this—I’m sure there are plenty of members who know perfectly well just how dangerous it would be to confirm RFK Jr. They don’t need to hear it from me—in fact, some of them may even know the danger better than I do.
    “But here’s what I do know: conscience is a muscle. Courage is a muscle. The less you use them, the more they fade away.
    “So if my colleagues are feeling the pressure from President Trump or if they are feeling the weight of the richest man in the world on their backs on this vote, I would warn them: this will certainly not be the last test we face here in the Senate.
    “Giving into pressure now won’t make it go away. It won’t soften the pressure you face later, and it will not strengthen your resolve when the stakes are higher. It will just show: pressure works.
    “If you do not draw a line somewhere, you will cross every line you could ever imagine. You will be pushed further and further into accepting things you never thought you would—things you thought you never could.
    “I think most of my colleagues know what is really at stake here. I think most of my colleagues knowwhat sort of man RFK Jr. is, and what sort of damage he could do if confirmed.
    “There are political realities, we all get that—but there is also right and wrong. There is also fact and fiction.
    “There is people staying healthy, and people dying pointlessly—kids dying pointlessly—from diseases that we can prevent, because they thought Congress took its job vetting our health secretary seriously.
    “So, M. President, I urge all my colleagues to show some courage. I urge them to show some conscience. I urge them to vote NO on RFK Jr.’s nomination.”

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: expert reaction to study looking at hormonal contraceptives and stroke and heart attack risk

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    A study published in the BMJ looks at hormonal contraceptives and the risk of heart attacks and strokes.

    Dr Sonya Babu-Narayan, Clinical Director at the British Heart Foundation and consultant cardiologist, said:

    “You shouldn’t be overly alarmed by these findings if you are using or considering starting hormonal contraception.  The additional risk of heart attack and stroke is very low for the vast majority – it’s equivalent to one extra heart attack for every 10,000 women using hormonal contraception for a year.  And pregnancy itself also increases your risk of developing blood clots, stroke and heart attack.

    “When considering hormonal contraception options, you will be able to discuss the risks and benefits with your GP so that you can make an informed decision about what is best for you.  This could include discussion and management of your existing cardiovascular risk factors like high blood pressure, diabetes, smoking, or if you are living with obesity.

    “The study lends weight to previous evidence of an association between hormonal contraception use and a small increase in the number of heart attacks and strokes.  The researchers made use of a wealth of long-term electronic healthcare information from over 2 million people in Denmark – this scale and breadth makes the findings more reliable and complete than previous studies and enables study of even rare complications like these.

    “However, the study is observational so it can’t prove cause and effect, and there may be other factors at play driving the links seen that aren’t sufficiently accounted for.

    “This latest study supports the current practice of recommending the option of a progestin intrauterine device – the hormonal coil – for those already living with high cardiovascular risk, as this wasn’t linked to more heart attacks and strokes.”

    Dr Becky Mawson, NIHR Clinical Lecturer in Primary Care, and GP with special interest in sexual and reproductive health, University of Sheffield, said:

    “Please do not stop using contraception based on this study!  The risk of stroke and heart attack in pregnancy and postnatal period is significantly higher than the risks reported in this study for contraceptives.  For those using contraceptives for treatment of health conditions, the slightly increased risk needs to be balanced with the benefit in quality of life for those suffering debilitating gynaecological and hormonal conditions.

    “Saying that, if you have other risk factors for strokes and heart disease, then it is worth discussing with your healthcare team to look at the safest options like the hormonal coil.  This observational study looks at relationships in data, not causes.  It adds to previous studies within the same database looking at increased blood clot risk.

    “While it remains true as it has done for years that we need to find better, risk-free alternatives to prevent pregnancy, in my view this study hasn’t changed that and should not cause alarm but does add to growing knowledge in this area.”

    Dr Clare Arnott, Conjoint Associate Professor, Cardiologist and Head of Cardiovascular Program, The George Institute for Global Health, and UNSW Sydney, said:

    “This is an interesting, timely and important study.  It is wonderful to see sex-specific cardiovascular risk factors given appropriate attention in medical research.

    “The study identified twice the risk of stroke and heart attack in those exposed to the combined oral contraceptive pill (and around 1.5x the risk for progestin only formulations).  Interestingly, while risk was also increased for the combined vaginal ring and patch (with relative risks higher with these preparations), no increased risk was observed for the progestin-only IUD.  Also of note, and clinical relevance, duration of use did not appear to impact risk.

    “While these relative risks are important, particularly at a public health/population level, it should be noted that absolute risk remains low in this patient population of young women.  It is also important to note that this study excluded women with a history of arterial thrombosis – a high risk group, and thus these results cannot be extrapolated to that population.

    “The study is strengthened by a large cohort size, which is nationally representative, long patient follow up period, and is adequately powered with respect to the number of events recorded.  Of course, as the authors rightly acknowledge, this is observational research, and correlation is not the same as causation.

    “Nonetheless, it is valuable information that should be routinely communicated to women to allow them, in conjunction with their healthcare provider, to make informed decisions about their health.  These data are also very important at a public health/ population level given the >200 million women worldwide using hormonal contraception, and thus public health clinicians and policy makers should take note.”

    Prof Angela Clerk, Professor of Biomedical Science, University of Reading, said:

    “The study appears to be comprehensive and rigorous, representing the whole of the Danish population.  There should be some caution in extrapolating to other populations with different ethnicities, since genetic background and cultural variation could affect cardiovascular risk, and some ethnicities not fully covered by the Danish population could have greater vulnerability.

    “This is clearly an important study but, while the focus is on the potential negative effects of contraception on cardiovascular risk, it is also clear that any increase in risk is actually very small.  This emphasises the overall safety of the drugs, particularly when balanced against the negative effects of unwanted pregnancies resulting from a lack of contraception.  Yes, there should be informed choice of the type of contraception, but perhaps lifestyle choices need to take greater precedence.  Though I am past that stage, this study would not stop me from using any of these forms of contraception over not using one and facing an unplanned pregnancy.”

    Dr Channa Jayasena, Consultant in Reproductive Endocrinology, Imperial College London, said:

    “Contraceptive medication is a vital healthcare option, which offers lower chances of accidental pregnancy compared with barrier contraceptive methods.  Contraceptives work by using high doses of female hormones like oestrogen and / or progesterone to temporarily ‘switch off’ the ovaries and womb.  Oestrogen is a ‘sticky’ hormone because it makes blood more likely to clot.  It is well-known that The Pill increases blood clot risk.  Increased blood clot risk increases risks of related problems like stroke and heart attack.  The current study helps to define the risks of different types of contraceptive medication.

    “The study is well designed because looks at health records from 2 million women of reproductive age living in Denmark.  The authors were careful to adjust for factors which might have affected the results.  The findings confirm that The Pill is associated with increased risks of stroke and heart attack.  Observational studies like this one cannot conclude that the Pill has caused stroke and heart attack; but our prior knowledge of how the pill works makes this likely.

    “My biggest criticism is the way that the results are presented.  Only 3 per 1000 women were affected by a stroke or heart attack; the risk among those on the pill was about 6-10 per 1000.  The absolute risk of having a stroke or heart attack on The Pill is still very low.

    “Women should take away the importance of smoking cessation, healthy eating, and exercise to minimise the (small) increased risk of stroke or heart attack associated with being on the pill.  Women who have high risks of stroke or heart attack that cannot be reduced should strongly consider a hormonal coil, because of its lack of associated increased stroke or heart attack risk.”

    ‘Stroke and myocardial infarction with contemporary hormonal contraception: real-world, nationwide, prospective cohort study’ by Harman Yonis et al. was published in the BMJ at 23:30 UK time on Wednesday 12 February 2025.

    DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2024-082801

    Declared interests

    Dr Sonya Babu-Narayan: “No conflicts of interests to declare.”

    Dr Becky Mawson: “Current project with South Yorkshire Digital Health Hub – The Hormone Effect – developing an app to collect data on side effects of contraception.

    Research lead (unpaid and no financial benefits) – The Lowdown Women’s Health Platform.”

    Dr Clare Arnott: “None to declare.”

    Prof Angela Clerk: “I no conflict of interest under any of the categories below with respect to industry funding.  I have no conflict of interest with any of my own research under these categories either.  I am a woman, however.”

    Dr Channa Jayasena: “No conflicts to declare.”

    MIL OSI United Kingdom