NewzIntel.com

    • Checkout Page
    • Contact Us
    • Default Redirect Page
    • Frontpage
    • Home-2
    • Home-3
    • Lost Password
    • Member Login
    • Member LogOut
    • Member TOS Page
    • My Account
    • NewzIntel Alert Control-Panel
    • NewzIntel Latest Reports
    • Post Views Counter
    • Privacy Policy
    • Public Individual Page
    • Register
    • Subscription Plan
    • Thank You Page

Category: Ukraine

  • MIL-OSI Submissions: Russia – MSF-Netherlands is instructed to deregister in the Russian Federation and consequently has to close its programmes in the country

    Source: Médecins Sans Frontières/ Doctors Without Borders (MSF)

    Moscow/ Amsterdam, 17 September 2024: Thirty-two years after starting work in the Russian Federation, Médecins Sans Frontières/ Doctors Without Borders (MSF) had to close its operations in the country.  

    “It is with a heavy heart that we have to close our activities in the Russian Federation,” says Yashovardhan, head of MSF programmes in the country. “Our organisation’s work is guided by the principles of independence, impartiality and neutrality and medical ethics, we provide assistance based on the needs.”

    In August this year, we received a letter from the Ministry of Justice of Russia, with the decision to withdraw the affiliate office of the non-profit association ‘Médecins Sans Frontières’ (Netherlands) in the Russian Federation from the Register of affiliate and representative offices of foreign NGOs.

    The international humanitarian medical organisation had been present in Russia since 1992. For more than 30 years, we successfully implemented dozens of programmes, ranging from assistance to the homeless to emergency response to the collaborative work with the Ministry of Health in the innovative tuberculosis treatment. We worked in various regions of the country: in Moscow, St. Petersburg, the Kemerovo region, Chechnya, Ingushetia, Dagestan and – more recently – in the Arkhangelsk and Ivanovo regions as well as in the south of Russia in Belgorod and Rostov-on-Don.

    A significant part of the history of MSF in Russia and the region was linked to the implementation of advanced approaches to the treatment of tuberculosis. MSF has collaborated with medical academic community of Russia and other countries in the Eastern Europe and Central Asia to extend effective, innovative treatment for drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR TB) to patients in penitentiary and civil sectors across the region.

    In 2004-2017, we worked in close partnership with the Chechen Ministry of Health (MoH), providing technical and advisory support to the local health authorities in the treatment of drug-sensitive and drug-resistant tuberculosis in the Chechen Republic. The programme covered different aspects of TB diagnostics, treatment, laboratory services and health education, as well as adherence counselling and psychosocial support for patients and their families. In 2014, MSF supported MoH in introducing new treatment regimens for patients with extensively drug-resistant TB which yielded impressive results giving hope to patients who previously had no treatment options left.

    In 2021, MSF and local health authorities of the Arkhangelsk region in the north of Russia started successful implementation of a nine-month all-oral course of treatment for DR TB. 173 patients were enrolled on this treatment regimen. And later, in 2023, we started enrolling patients on an even shorter – just six months-long – all-oral treatment course that was recommended by the World Health Organization in the updated treatment guidelines in late 2022.

    In Arkhangelsk and starting from 2024 in Ivanovo, MSF was providing expertise and technical assistance to health authorities with a special emphasis on implementing new treatment regimens and enhancing patients’ adherence and integrating person-centred care. To date, 41 patients in the Arkhangelsk and Ivanovo regions started treatment for DR TB within this joint programme. The aim of the collaboration was to contribute to the evidence base for more effective – less toxic, person-centred – treatment with a view to scale up these scientifically proven treatment protocols in Russia.

    In Moscow and St Petersburg since 2020, MSF partnered with two community-based NGOs to support access to general healthcare, as well as testing and treatment for infectious diseases, for people living with HIV and other vulnerable groups, such as migrants, who otherwise struggle to obtain medical assistance.  Over 14,000 medical consultations were supported for patients from these vulnerable groups.

    Since the escalation of the armed conflict in Ukraine in 2022, many people have sought safety in Russia, and MSF in partnership with local NGOs in the Belgorod and Rostov regions in the south of Russia started providing assistance to those who crossed into Russia from Ukraine and later – with the development of the situation – internally displaced people. Since the start of our response in 2022, more than 52,000 refugees and displaced people were provided with humanitarian aid and more than 15,400 received free medical, mental health and psychosocial support.

    As part of this partnership, we were also planning to respond to the humanitarian and medical needs of the internally displaced people in the Kursk region. MSF continues to stand in solidarity with people impacted by this conflict and remain steadfast in our commitment to provide humanitarian assistance to those in need, irrespective of what side of the front line they are on, should the necessary conditions for our work be provided by relevant authorities.

    “We would like to take the opportunity to thank all our colleagues in Russia for their hard work and commitment to humanitarian values we hold high as an organisation,” says Norman Sitali, MSF Operations Manager responsible for programmes in Russia. “We are very sad to conclude our programmes in the country as many people in Russia in need of medical and humanitarian assistance will now be left without the support we could have provided to them. MSF would like to still work in Russia again if and when possible”.

    MSF Australia was established in 1995 and is one of 24 international MSF sections committed to delivering medical humanitarian assistance to people in crisis. In 2022, more than 120 project staff from Australia and New Zealand worked with MSF on assignment overseas. MSF delivers medical care based on need alone and operates independently of government, religion or economic influence and irrespective of race, religion or gender. For more information visit msf.org.au  

    MIL OSI – Submitted News –

    September 29, 2024
  • MIL-OSI USA News: Remarks by President  Biden at the Economic Club of Washington,  D.C.

    Source: The White House

    1:15 P.M. EDT

    THE PRESIDENT:  Hello, hello, hello.  (Applause.)  Thank you, David.  In my household, we refer to David as the Washington Monument.  (Laughter.)  He’s been a friend a long time — a long time.  And not only thank you for the introduction, David, but thank you for your friendship. 

    And thank you all for being here and allowing me to be here. 

    Yesterday was an important day for the county, in my view.  Two and a half years after the Federal Reserve began raising interest rates, it announced that it would begin lowering interest rates.

    I think it’s good news for consumers, and it means the cost of buying a home, a car, and so much more will be going down.  And it’s good news, in my view, for the overall economy, because lower borrowing costs will support economic growth. 

    And it’s an important signal from the Fed- — from the Federal Reserve to the nation that after repeated interest hikes to cool down inflation, inflation has come back down, and the Fed — the Fed is lowering — switched to lowering rates to keep the country growing — the economy growing.

    At its peak, as you all know, inflation was 9.1 percent in the United States.  Today, it is much closer to 2 percent. 

    That doesn’t mean our work is done.  Far from it.  Far from it. 

    No one should confuse why I am here.  I’m not here to take a victory lap.  I’m not here to say, “A job well done.”  I’m not here to say, “We don’t have a hell of a lot more work to do.”  We do have more work to do. 

    But what I am here to speak about is how far we’ve come, how we got here, and, most importantly, the foundation that I believe [we’ve] built for a more prosperous and equitable future in America. 

    So, let’s be clear.  The Fed lowering interest rates is- — isn’t a declaration of victory.  It’s a declaration of progress.   It’s a signal we’ve entered a new phase of our economy and our recovery. 

    You know, I believe the [it’s] important for the country to recognize this progress, because — because if we don’t, the progress we made will remain locked in the fear of negative mindset and dominate our economic outlook since the pandemic began, instead of seeing the immense opportunities in front of us right now. 

    It’s — this is a moment, in my view, for business to feel greater confidence to invest, hire, and to expand.  It’s a moment for individuals to feel greater confidence buying a home, a new car, starting a family, starting a new business.  

    We’ve — we’re creating jobs.  [Un]employment remains very low.  Small-business creation is at its historic highs.  The economy is growing.  The main challenge we’ve had — it’s been a painful one but — has been the pandemic and the inflation it created, causing enormous pain and hardship for families all across America.  That’s not true just for us but for every major economy in the world. 

    But now — now inflation is coming down in the United States.  And the fact is, it’s come down faster and lower than almost any other [of the] world’s advanced economies. 

    So now, instead of looking at interest rates increases, interest rates are going to be coming down, and they’re expected to go down further.  And that’s a good place for us to be.  (Applause.)

    Now, a lot of people, as you all know — maybe you know a few — thought we’d never get here.  When Kamala and I came to office, 3,000 people a day were dying of COVID — 3,000 a day.  Millions of Americans had lost their jobs, their businesses.  And the global economy was in a tailspin. 

    Four years ago, we inherited the worst pandemic in a century and the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression.  In fact, my predecessor was one of just a few — two presidents in American history who left office with fewer jobs than the day he came into office.  The other?  Herbert Hoover. 

    When I came to office, there was no real plan in place — no plan to deal with the pandemic, no plan to get the economy back on its feet.  Nothing — virtually nothing. 

    In fact, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office predicted we wouldn’t — they wouldn’t see a full recovery until well after the end of my first term in office.  But I refused to accept that, like many of you refused to accept it. 

    I came into office determined not only to deliver immediate economic relief for the American people but to transform the way our economy works over the long term; to write a new economic playbook, grow the economy from the middle out and the bottom up, not just the top down; put workers first; support unions to make sure workers have a bargaining clout they need to get a fair price to grow that pie — and after all, it’s the productivity that’s — they — they’re the productivity baked into that pie, in my view; no one — leave no one behind; foster fair — fair competition; invest in all of America and in all Americans. 

    When we do things for the poor and have — they have a ladder up, the middle class does very well, and the wealthy continue to do very well.  We all do well.  And we are doing well.  Working families and the middle class are the center of the strong, equitable, and sustainable recovery. 

    Here are the keys from the new playbook, in my view.  Within the first two months in office, I signed the American Rescue Plan, one of the most significant economic recovery packages in our history.  Not a single person on the other team — Republicans — voted for it. 

    It delivered shots in the arm for vaccines to vaccinate the nation in one of the most sophisticated logistical operations in American history.  I found it incredibly difficult to plan that.  Without protecting our nation from COVID, our economic recovery would never have taken off. 

    It also delivered immediate economic relief for those who needed it the most.  An individual earning less than $75,000 a year received a $1,400 check.  So, a family of five earning less than $150,000 a year could receive as much as $7,000.  And, by the way, in middle-class families like the one I grew up and many of you grew up in, that is a game changer.  That saved people’s sense of being. 

    It also prevented a wave — a wave of evictions, bankruptcies, and delinquencies and defaults that the previous crises weak- — weakened the recovery and left working families permanently further behind.

    I was determined to avoid what Secretary Yellen called the “economic scarring” — scarring that hurt so many Americans and left them behind in the past. 

    We delivered essential funding to states and local governments to keep essential services moving, to keep teachers and first responders on the job, to keep small businesses open, and to build more housing.  We also expanded the Child Tax Credit to cut child poverty in half. 

    And with the Butch Lewis Act, we took the most significant action in 50 years to protect the pensions of millions of union workers and retirees.  Before we acted, workers faced cuts to their pensions.  Now we’re restoring the full amount of their pensions, including for workers who previously saw cuts. 

    And there’s so much more. 

    But we also know the pandemic led to a surge in inflation all across American and the world — and the country, I should say.  And the economy shut down and then opened back up in an unprecedented manner.  Shipping had stalled.  Factories shut down.  Inflation grew worse after Putin invaded Ukraine, which sent food prices skyrocketing and energy prices soaring around the world. 

    So, we immediately brought together business and labor to fix the problem with broken supply chains and unclog our ports, trucking networks, and shipping lines. 

    Remember those massive cargo ships stuck outside the port of Loa- — of Los Angeles, delaying deliveries and driving up prices during the holiday season?  Remember that?  Remember the shortage of baby formula and the crisis that caused?  Well, we got supply chains back to normal.  When we did that, inflation began to ease.  Doesn’t solve, but ease.

    It also — I also — I also rallied our allies to stand against Putin’s aggression.  In the beginning, there wasn’t a whole lot of support for that.  I warned them all.  I got clearance from the intelligence community to let them know when he was going to invade.  They didn’t believe it was going to happen.  But he invaded exactly when I said he was.  Led the world to realize that we had a real problem.

    And it — releasing oil reserves to stabilize global markets to — and, by the way, our gas prices are now down to $3.22, lower than before the invasion — (applause) — and $3 — below $3 a gallon in 14 states, including Delaware.  (Laughter and applause.)  I can go home now, past the gas station.  (Laughter.)

    Energy production for all — from all sources is now at record highs in America — record highs. 

    And unlike my predecessor, I respect the Federal Reserve’s independence as they pursued — it’s a mandate — to bring inflation down.  That independence has served the country well. 

    And, by the way, I’ve never once spoken to the chairman of the Fed since I became president.  It’ll also do enormous damage to our economy if that independence is ever lost. 

    You know, my new economic playbook also rejects the long-held conventional view among economists — many economists — that we had to lower our ambitions to bring inflation down. 

    After I took action to rescue the economy, we got relief to families that needed it.  Some experts predicted that people would have a — that we would leave the labor market and not come back to work.  They referred to this as “the Great Resignation.”  Remember that?  The Great Resignation.

    Well, to state the obvious, they were dead wrong.  We now have the highest working-age employment in decades.  (Applause.)  

    Other critics said it would take the loss of millions of Americans’ jobs to — and a decline in real wages and, yes, the recession to get inflation back down.  Possible, but I refused to accept that.  I believed, sometimes over the amazement of my staff, that we should seize the moment to finally invest in all of America and all Americans for decades to come.  We did just that with what I call our Investing in America agenda. 

    How can we have the strongest economy in the world without the most advanced infrastructure in the world?  How can that be?

         That’s why I wrote and worked so hard to pass the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, the most significant law in generations, to modernize our roads, bridges, ports, airports, trains, buses; removing every lead pipe from schools and homes so every child could drink clean water; providing affordable — (applause) — providing affordable high-speed Internet for every American, no matter where they live, not unlike what Franklin Roosevelt did. 

    Remember what he did?  You don’t remember.  You weren’t around, nor — by the way, I wasn’t — (laughter) — I’m old, but I wasn’t there either.  (Laughter.)  But he decided that rural America had to have access to electricity.

    The Internet is a — as a — is as critical as electricity was during his period. 

    I remember saying that to my younger staff, who looked at me, “Well, what are you talking about?”  (Laughter.)

    But look, we’re growing our economy.  We got more to do.  We’re improving our quality of life.  We’re literally building a better America because of all of you.  

    In fact, “Buy American” has been the law of the land since the 1930s.  And I have to admit to you, Tommy, the — “Tommy,” excuse me — Congressman Carper, my buddy — (laughter) — I didn’t realize that when they wrote the law in ‘33 about unions organizing, they also had a provision in there: Any money — it says any money the president is sent from the Congress to invest on an investment in America should use American workers and use American products.  Past administrations, including my predecessor, failed to buy American.  Not anymore.      

    Kamala and I are making sure the federal projects building American roads, bridges, highways, and so much more beyond that, like aircraft carriers and tanks, they will be made with American products and built by American workers, creating good-paying American jobs. 

    How can we be the strongest nation in the world without leading the world in science and technology?  I mean, think about it.  We walked away for a long while in investing in science and technology as a government.   

    During the pandemic, the American people learned about supply chains.  You know, I remember going home and saying, “Well, the supply chain.”  And my family, “The supply chain?  What the hell is a supply chain?”  (Laughter.)  No, but I’m serious.  Think about it.  It became common knowledge what a supply — what we’re talking about to all — the average American.

    And the shortage of semiconductors, those little tiny computer chips smaller than a tip of your finger that power everything — but every — everyday lives, from smartphones, to automobiles and dishwashers, to advanced weapon systems, and so much more.  Think about it.  It takes over 3,000 chips to build an automobile.  Remember the crisis when we didn’t have access to those in the automobile industry? 

    And, by the way, we invented these chips here in America.  And we still design the most sophisticated chips in the world. 

    But over time, my predecessors thought it was better to manufacture those chips overseas because the labor was cheaper.  That’s why they went overseas. 

    The result: When the pandemic shut down those chip factories overseas, the price of everything went up because we didn’t have enough chips here in America. 

    We learned the hard way that one of the best ways to strengthen our supply chi- — our supply chain is to make sure the supply chains starts in America — starts in America.  (Applause.) 

    And, by the way, if I could hold in the back there, that’s why I — I have great relationships with the European friends.  But this is one where they go, “Whoa.”  (Laughter.)  That’s why I literally wrote and signed the CHIPS and Science Act, to bring manufacturing back home and so much more. 

    As a result, private companies from around the world are now investing tens of billions of dollars to build new chip factories right here in America — in New York, Ohio, Arizona — all across the country.  

    You know, it takes time to build these factories.  But the number of construction workers is way up, and they’re making good salaries — already creating tens of thousands of jobs in construction facilities.  But the American public is going, “Well, where’s all this going, Biden?”  Because they haven’t s- — they expected this to happen overnight.  You got to build the factories first.

    When these factories are finally built, we’ll have tens of thousands of jobs running those factories — so-called fabs.  As you all know — this is one audience I don’t have to explain it to — they’re — these fabs are bigger than football fields, creating jobs that are going to pay over $100,000 a year, and you don’t need a college degree.

    And it’s going to generate such economic growth when the one outs- — in — outside of Columbus, Ohio — a thousand acres.  I call it a field of dreams.

    The old playbook was to go abroad to the cheapest labor, export American jobs, and import foreign products.  Our new playbook is we export American products and create American jobs right here in America where they belong.  (Applause.)

    But that’s not all.  I wrote and signed into law the Inflation Reduction Act, the most significant climate law ever, anywhere in the history of the world.  When I say “I wrote,” I actually did write some of this, my — my daughter would say, “with my own paw.”  (Laughter.) 

    Skeptics told me we couldn’t get it done.  Remember?  We couldn’t get this done; there was no possibility of this.  There wasn’t a consensus.  And if we did it, it would be too late and too little.  But we did it with your help: $369 billion for climate and clean energy, more than ever happened in the history of the world.

    Not a single one of the opposition — Republican friends — voted for it.  It took Vice President Harris to cast the tiebreaking vote in the Senate. 

    The Inflation Reduction Act is going to help cut carbon emissions in half by 2030, and we’re well on the way, including — well, I won’t go into it all — and creating hundreds of thousands of good-paying clean energy jobs for American workers.  I set up a Climate Corps, just like the Peace Corps; it’s going to — you watch what happens with that.

    Lower energy costs for families with tax credits to install rooftop solar and efficient-energy appliances, to weatherize your windows and doors with high-tech insulation, more efficient heating and cooling systems — and get a tax credit for doing it and grow employment and grow the economy — and so much more. 

    And, again, many of you are doing — you’re the ones doing it.  You’re creating these good-paying jobs. 

    The Inflation Reduction Act also focused on lowering costs for prescription drugs. 

    There was a law in America that I fought like hell as a senator — and a lot of others who did for a long, long time — to change the law: The only agency that could not negotiate prices was Medicare.  For years, many other members of Congress fought — for decades — to change that and give Medicare the power to negotiate lower drug prices, like the VA is able to lower dr- — negotiate drug prices for veterans. 

    Well, with the Inflation Reduction Act, we finally beat Big Pharma.  And we finally gave Medicare the power to negotiate lower prescription drug prices. 

    And now — millions of seniors have diabetes, as one example, but now, instead of paying up to $400 a month for that insulin for their diabetes, they’re only paying 35 bucks a month — 35 bucks. 

    And they’re still making a hell of a profit, by the way.  You know how much it costs to make that insulin?  Ten dollars.  T-E-N dollars.  Ten dollars.  Package the whole thing, you get up to $13.

    And, by the way, if I had Air Force One sitting out there, I could get you in the plane and take you anywhere in the world, any major capital.  Whatever prescription you have, I can get it for you cheaper in Toronto, London, Berlin, Rome — anywhere around the world.

    But it’s just beginning.  The same law says that starting this January — we don’t have to cha- — any new changes with the law, the existing law — every senior’s total prescription drug cost will be capped at $2,000 a year, no matter how expensive their drugs are, even expensive cancer drugs that cost 10-, 12-, 14,000 bucks a year. 

    And these reforms don’t just save seniors money, but, equally important, they save every American taxpayer money.  Just so far, these reforms will save American taxpayers $160 billion over the next decade because Medicare won’t have to pay — spend (inaudible).  (Applause.)

    And, by the way, that weight-loss medicine is just getting going, man, that debate.  (Laughter.)  Watch.

    All told, we’re proving that we can bring down inflation while safeguarding hard-won gains in jobs and real wages in American workers. 

    Today, a record 16 million jobs created, more than any other single presidential term. 

    When I took office, more than 2 million women left the workforce due to the pandemic.  If you listen to these other guys, they think women don’t want to work.  They don’t know women in America.  (Applause.)  No, I’m serious.  Watch.  Watch, watch, watch.

    And speaking of watches, on my watch — (laughter) — we reversed the loss.  We actually increased the number of women working by an addition 2 million women in the workforce.  (Applause.)  

    And, by the way, we have the highest share of working-age women on jobs since 1948, when we started — and we’re — and we — we started to keep track back then.  With wages up, incomes up for women workers, we’ve always believed women should be paid equally for equal work.  And there’s not a single damn job a woman can’t do that a man can do, including being president of the United States of America.  (Applause.) 

    You all think I’m kidding.  My younger sister used to be three years younger than me.  She’s now 20 years younger.  (Laughter.)  Went to the same university, took the same courses.  She graduated with honors; I graduated.  (Laughter.)  She’s the one who should be — anyway.  (Laughter.)

    Nineteen million people have applied to start new businesses.  That’s a record.  And here’s the thing about those new businesses: Every application to start a new business is an act of hope.  It’s an act of optimism, hope. 

    More Americans have health insurance than ever before, and I don’t think that should be something we should sneeze at.  Everyone deserves basic health care. 

    The racial wealth gap — (applause) — is the smallest in 20 years. 

    Remember how many economists thought we’d need a recession to bring down inflation?  There was even a major financial news headline, which I’ll not reference, saying, “100 percent chance of a recession in 2023.”  Well, instead, our economy grew by more than 3 percent last year, and inflation came way down.  (Applause.) 

    American households came out of the crisis — American households — with stronger balance sheets, higher incomes, greater wealth.  And all that progress is a remarkable testament to the resilience and determination of the American people.  They’re the one — I mean, determination of American workers; of American entrepreneurs, like all of you; American business. 

    It’s in stark contrast to my predecessor’s record.  His failure in handling the pandemic led to hundreds of thousands of Americans dying because of COVID.  Remember “just inject a little dye, you’ll be okay”? 

    His failure to lead the economic crisis that followed that created millions of Americans — caused them to lose their jobs.  In fact, the last month of his failed term was the last month our economy lost jobs.  On my watch, the economy has created jobs every single month for nearly four years.  (Applause.)  Because of you.

    My predecessor enacted a $2 trillion tax cut that made — overwhelmingly benefited the very wealthy and the biggest corporations.  Made you feel good, I’m sure.  But guess what?  We don’t have to hurt corporations.  We don’t have to — I come from the corporate state of the world.  For 36 years, I represented the state — Tom and I — that had more corporations incorporated in Delaware than every other nation in the United States of America — every other state in the nation — the entire nation — in the state of Delaware.

    But what did his policies do?  It increased the federal deficit significantly, more than any other previous presidential term.  And the federal deficit went up every single year of his presidency and left office with the largest annual deficit in American history: $3 trillion. 

    And now he not only would give another $5 trillion tax cut for the very wealthy and the biggest corporations, he wants a new sales tax on imported goods — food, gasoline, clothing, and more.  As most of you know, such policies would cost the average American family nearly $4,000 a year. 

    But he and his allies say they support workers and the middle class.  Give me a break.

    On my watch, we’ve created over 700,000 manufacturing jobs.  He lost 170,000 manufacturing jobs in four years.  On our watch, factory construction is at a record high.  It increased 210 percent.  On the other team’s watch, factory construction barely increased 2 percent. 

    On my watch, the trade deficit with China declined to its lowest level in a decade.  On his watch, the trade deficit with China soared. 

    On my watch, we’re seeing a record stock market and record 401(k)s. 

    And the bottom line is I’m a capitalist.  I wish I had more stock.  (Laughter.)  But I believe capitalism is the greatest force to grow the economy for everybody.  I really mean it. 

    Now, don’t point to the fact that for 36 — this time I’m going to point out to you — when they did the income of all the members of Congress, I was listed as the poorest man in Congress.  (Laughter.)  I never thought I was poor.  I had a decent salary as a senator.

    But we face a fundamental choice.  For the past 40 years, too many leaders have sworn by an economic theory that has not worked very well at all: trickle-down economics.  Cut taxes for the very wealthy — and they deserve having taxes cut — but cut for the very wealthy and hope the benefits trickle down.

    Well, guess what?  Not a whole lot trickled down to my dad’s kitchen table. 

    It’s clear, especially under my predecessor, that trickle-down economics failed.  And he’s promised it again — trickle-down economics — but it will fail again.

    In fact, President Clinton pointed out that since the end of the Cold War in ‘89, America has created about 51 million jobs.  Of those 51 million jobs in that period, the economy under Democratic presidents created 50 million — a fact — 50 million of those.  And the economy under Republican presidents created 1 million of those new jobs. 

    Folks, I’ve laid out a better choice, in my view, to grow the economy from the middle out and the bottom up.  I promised to be a president to all Americans, whether they voted for me or not.  And I kept that promise, making a lot of Democrats very angry because studies show that I signed actually — one of the laws I signed actually delivered more benefits to red states than to blue states.  That’s a fact.  More went to Republican states than Democratic states.  That may not have been good politics, but I believe it’s good for the country.  And I kept my promise.

    Today, we are better positioned than any nation in the world to truly win the economic competition of the 21st century, in my view.  And there’s so much more we can do.    

    We’re going to continue bringing down prices for families by building more affordable housing, making childcare more affordable — and, by the way, you make it more affordable, it increases economic growth — growth — growth — by continuing to lower health care costs as well. 

    We’re continuing fighting to make sure everyone — everyone pays their fair share in taxes. 

    And, by the way, I hope some of you out there are billionaires, but paying 8.2 percent ain’t quite enough.  If you just paid 25 percent, it would generate enough income — $500 billion over the next 10 years.  We could cut the deficit.  And be paying 25 percent wouldn’t — anyway, I don’t want to get into it.  If I get going, might — (laughter).

    But my point is that includes restoring the — extended the Child Care Tax Credit to cut child poverty in half. 

    We’re determined to lower prescription drug costs not just for seniors but for everyone, helping the federal budget and household budgets and so much more. 

    I’m sorry to go on so long.  Let me close with this.  I probably — you know, early in my term, I traveled — to the skepticism of some of my own team and many of the Democrats — to South Korea to meet with President (inaudible) and — President Hu in — in Sou- — in South Korea and the CEO of Samsung.  They were manufacturing a significant portion of the chips in the world.

    And I sat with them and I encouraged both of them to invest in America.  And they agreed.  What surprised me, when I asked the CEO of Samsung why he was prepared to invest billions of dollars to build chip factories in the United States, they mentioned two reasons: because of our workforce, which I know we have the best workers in the world.  And second, they said we have the safest, the most secure nation in the world in which to invest. 

    And now, as I stand here in front of some of the most signifi- — significant business leaders and successful business leaders in the country, we also know we have the best research universities in the world — the best in the world.  We have the most dynamic capitalist system in the world. 

    But here’s what we can’t take for granted.  We have stability because we have a rule of law.  Our democracy is unparalleled. 

    I know I talk about the — a lot about democracy from the first time I ran.  But it’s really under stress.  For real.  We can never lose those democratic principles.

    American business, our economic dynamism can’t succeed, in my view, without a stability and security that makes us the envy of the world — and we are.

    Four years ago, we’ve gone from a histor- — historic crisis to greater progress than any of us thought possible.  We did it with a new playbook based on one of the most im- — oldest truths of our nation: Believe in America.  Invest in America.  That’s the truth. 

    Give the American people half a chance.  They have never, ever, ever, ever, ever let the country down.  Give them a full chance, and watch them lift us up to endless possibilities.  (Applause.)

    That’s what I see in this room.  Incredible — I really mean this, and I’m not trying to be solicitous with you — an incredibly — incredible business leaders, innovators who embody that sense of possibilities.

    You know, I spent more time with Xi Jinping than any world leader has: over 90 hours with him alone, traveled 17,000 miles with him in the United States and a — and in — and in China. 

    We were in the Tibetan Plateau, and he looked at me.  He said, “Can you define America for me?”  And, by the way, I gave all my notes in, so they have this.  (Laughter.)  And I said, “Yeah, I can define America in one word” — and I mean this from the bottom of my heart; I mean this from the bottom of my heart — “Possibilities.” 

    We’re a nation of possibilities.  We think big.  We believe big.  We sometimes fail, but we think big. 

    I have never been more optimistic about America’s future.  We just have to remember who the hell we are and how far we’ve come together.  We’re the United States of America, and there’s nothing — virtually nothing we cannot do when we act together.

    So, keep it up, folks.  We need you badly.

    God bless you all.  And may God protect our troops.  Thank you.  (Applause.)

    1:47 P.M. EDT

    MIL OSI USA News –

    September 29, 2024
  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: UN Human Rights Council 57: UK Statement for Commission of Inquiry on Ukraine

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    UK Statement for the Interactive Dialogue with the Commission of Inquiry on Ukraine. Delivered by the UK’s Permanent Representative to the WTO and the UN, Simon Manley.

    Location:
    Geneva
    Delivered on:
    23 September 2024 (Transcript of the speech, exactly as it was delivered)

    Thank you, Commissioners, for your update which as ever is all the more shocking and compelling for its sobriety and precision  

    As you make clear, Russia continues to commit appalling atrocities against the Ukrainian people.

    It’s indiscriminate attacks on civilian targets have intensified dramatically. August and July saw the highest number of civilian casualties in 2024. 

    Thousands of deported Ukrainian children remain in Russia.  We will not know the exact number or whereabouts of these children until Russia shares this information.

    Your update only reinforces the already overwhelming evidence of the systematic and widespread use of torture against Ukrainian detainees, including sexual violence. We have also seen reports of POWs being executed in the most barbaric manner.

    Three volunteers from the International Committee of the Red Cross were tragically killed in Donetsk this month.

    Soon we will mark two years since Russia’s attempted annexation of four oblasts in eastern Ukraine. Those living under

    Updates to this page

    Published 23 September 2024

    MIL OSI United Kingdom –

    September 29, 2024
  • MIL-OSI USA: During Climate Week, Markey, Badum, Merkley, Barragán Lead Over 100 International Lawmakers in Urging Biden Administration to Reject New LNG Exports

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Massachusetts Ed Markey

    Letter Text (PDF)

    Washington (September 23, 2024) – Senator Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.), chair of the Environment and Public Works Subcommittee on Clean Air, Climate, and Nuclear Safety, today partnered with Representative Lisa Badum, group coordinator in the German Bundestag’s Climate and Energy Committee and chairwoman of the Subcommittee on International Climate and Energy Policy, Senator Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), Representative Nanette Barragán (CA-44), Senate and House colleagues, and leaders from around the world in sending a letter to President Joe Biden and Secretary of Energy Jennifer Granholm, urging the administration to reject new liquefied natural gas (LNG) exports amidst the global climate crisis.

    The United States is already the world’s largest exporter of LNG and is on track to exponentially increase export capacity – a full build-out that could yield hundreds of million metric tons of additional greenhouse gases at home and abroad. Pushing back on arguments that United States’ international allies need the country’s LNG, members of the U.S. Congress and Parliaments around the world are requesting that the administration reject these applications. 

    In their letter to the administration, the lawmakers wrote, “Far from being a clean ‘bridge’ fuel, LNG causes significant environmental harm. In addition to the greenhouse gas released when LNG is burned, the potent greenhouse gas effects of pervasive methane leaks throughout the LNG supply chain — which extends from initial exploration all the way through gas production, pipeline transportation, liquefaction, vessel transportation, regasification, distribution, and end-use consumption — likely eliminate any climate advantage of reduced greenhouse gas emissions.”

    The lawmakers continued, “In addition to the environmental and health benefits, limiting U.S. LNG exports will actually support global energy security, not jeopardize it. In both emerging and developed markets, overinvestment in LNG diverts resources away from cheaper, more stable, and less trade-dependent clean energy investments.”

    In Europe:

    “While Europe’s energy system was strained in the immediate aftermath of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in early 2022, it has since recovered. Europeans united to slash overall gas demand by 20 percent over the past two years. Gas prices are lower than before the start of the war, despite drastically lower supply from Russia.”

    In Asia:

    “China, the world’s largest LNG importer, has emerged as a major re-exporter within the region and globally, cashing in on lucrative price differentials that are facilitated by long-term agreements with the United States. Similarly, Japan, facing declining domestic demand and oversupply, is redirecting LNG trade volumes to emerging markets in South and Southeast Asia, bolstering profitable re-trading ventures.” Additionally, “South Korea, despite existing low terminal utilization and climate commitments, has invested significantly in expanding LNG infrastructure, highlighting a mismatch between capacity expansions and actual demand.”

    In Africa:

    “The expansion of LNG export infrastructure has sparked displacement, conflict, and environmental degradation, with many projects facing the risk of becoming stranded assets amid declining global demand. The African LNG export market parallels the United States in prioritizing foreign market interests over local needs amidst declining demand. U.S. participation in the LNG export market fuels this exploitative industry, undermining claims of leadership in a just global energy transition.”

    In the Americas:

    “Investments in new re-exporting infrastructure in Mexico will soon become stranded assets with poor financial viability, threatening the economic stability of the country for the benefit of short-term U.S. interests. Moreover, the export of U.S. LNG through Mexico also transfers environmental and climate justice burdens associated with LNG infrastructure, expanding the footprint of the industry’s harm to the country’s unique biodiversity and frontline communities in Mexico.”

    Cosigners in the U.S. include Senator Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), and Representatives Jared Huffman (CA-02), Rashida Tlaib (MI-12), Jan Schakowsky (IL-09), Pramila Jayapal (WA-07), and Eleanor Holmes Norton (DC). Cosigners internationally include 30 Members of the Thailand Parliament, 15 Members of the European Parliament, 10 Members of the German Parliament, 3 Members of the United Kingdom Parliament, 2 Members of the Flemish Parliament, 2 Members of the National Assembly of the Gambia, 2 Members of the South Sudan Parliament, 2 Members of the Tanzanian Parliament the Australian Senator for Victoria, Brazilian State Deputy for Para, Canadian Senator for Quebec, the Deputy Prime Minister of Belgium, 1 former Member of the Sierra Leone Parliament, 1 former Member of the Catalan Parliament, 1 former Member of the Flemish Parliament, 1 Member of the Timor-Leste Parliament, Member of Parliament and Special Envoy on Climate Change and Environment from the Republic of Vanuatu, 1 Member of the Sierra Leone Parliament, 1 Member of Tasmania’s Legislative Council, 1 Member of the Australian Parliament, 1 Member of the Austrian Parliament, 1 Member of the Cambodian Parliament, 1 Member of the Cameroon National Assembly, 1 Member of the Colombian Congress, 1 Member of the Gambian Parliament, 1 Member of the Ghanaian Parliament, 1 Member of the Liberian House of Representatives, 1 Member of the Northern Ireland Assembly, 1 Member of the Scottish Parliament, 1 Member of the Swedish Parliament, 1 Member of the Swiss Parliament (National Council), 1 Member of the Tasmanian House of Assembly, 1 Member of the Ugandan Parliament, 1 Member of the UK House of Lords, and 1 Member of the Victorian Parliament in Australia on behalf of the Victorian Greens Members of Parliament.

    In July 2023, Senator Markey and several New England Senators sent a letter to the Department of Energy urging it to consider the disproportionate negative impacts of LNG on New England as the department considers updates to its underlying environmental and economic analyses to improve export authorization decisions for LNG. 

    In May 2024, Senator Markey and Representative Yvette Clarke (NY-09) announced the reintroduction of the Block All New (BAN) Fossil Fuel Exports Act, legislation that would amend the Energy Policy and Conservation Act and ban the export of American crude oil and natural gas abroad to protect frontline communities from dangerous export infrastructure, prioritize U.S. consumers against fossil fuel profiteering, and help ensure the United States meets its climate and clean energy commitments on the world stage.

    In March 2023, Senator Markey and Representatives Ayanna Pressley (MA-07) and Rashida Tlaib (MI-12) reintroduced the Fossil Free Finance Act, legislation that would direct the Federal Reserve to require major banks and other Systemically Important Financial Institutions (SIFIs) to stop financing projects and activities linked to increased greenhouse gas emissions and submit a plan on how they would meet these requirements. In October 2022, Senator Markey reintroduced the OPEC Accountability Act, legislation to require the U.S. President to initiate consultations with the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) and some non-OPEC countries to reduce crude oil production.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    September 29, 2024
  • MIL-OSI United Nations: Readout of the Secretary-General’s meeting with H.E. Ms. Ebba Busch, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Energy, Business and Industry of Sweden

    Source: United Nations secretary general

    The Secretary-General met with H.E. Ms. Ebba Busch, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Energy, Business and Industry of Sweden.

    The Secretary-General and the Deputy Prime Minister exchanged views on the follow-up to the Summit of the Future, including the Global Digital Compact, as well as on climate transition.  They also discussed the war in Ukraine.

    MIL OSI United Nations News –

    September 29, 2024
  • MIL-OSI Global: A new wave of Venezuelan refugees would threaten a humanitarian crisis – Latin America could learn from Europe

    Source: The Conversation – UK – By Omar Hammoud Gallego, Assistant Professor in Public Policy, Durham University

    Latin American countries are bracing themselves for a wave of Venezuelan migrants. Sebastian Delgado C / Shutterstock

    Venezuela’s disputed election results have thrown the country into chaos. The authoritarian leader of Venezuela, Nicolás Maduro, was declared the winner in a contested vote in July and, since then, has used state violence to inhibit any hint of protest.

    The crackdown has led to the deaths of more than 20 people at the hands of Venezuela’s security services and pro-government armed groups known as colectivos, while more than 2,400 people have been thrown in jail. And the opposition candidate who is widely believed to have won the vote, Edmundo González, has fled to Spain after being threatened with arrest.

    This swift escalation has sparked widespread concern throughout Latin America and beyond. Another wave of migration may be imminent, adding to the nearly 8 million people who have already left Venezuela since 2015. Countries across Latin America, especially Colombia, have expressed concern that a new surge of displaced Venezuelans might overwhelm public services and fuel political tensions.

    It is possible that governments in the region may respond by imposing stricter border controls to stem the flow of migrants. But past experience shows that this move would both be ineffective and harmful.

    Venezuela is a nation that was once known for its vast oil wealth. However, it has endured a prolonged period of economic and political instability. The country’s democratic backsliding began under former president Hugo Chávez in the early 2000s, but it worsened dramatically after he died in 2013 and Maduro came to power.

    Maduro’s rule has been marked by rampant inflation, a 75% reduction in GDP, and widespread political repression. These conditions have led to one of the largest migrations in modern history. Nearly a quarter of Venezuela’s population have fled their homes, primarily to other South American countries.




    Read more:
    Venezuelan migrants are boosting economic growth in South America, says research


    Initially, many Latin American nations coordinated their response. Governments came together in Ecuador to sign the Quito Declaration in 2018, for example, which committed them to ensuring the safe and regular migration of Venezuelan citizens.

    However, this cooperative spirit soon began to unravel. Chile, Ecuador and Peru made it much harder for ordinary Venezuelans to enter their countries legally by introducing visa restrictions by the middle of 2019. These restrictions replaced earlier policies that allowed entry to Ecuador and Peru with just an ID card.

    The effectiveness of these restrictions has been the subject of much debate. In a recent study, I compared the experiences of countries that introduced restrictions with those of Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay, which kept their borders open.

    My findings suggest that restricting migration in South America has not prevented it. Migration has instead been driven underground, with significant costs both for migrants and host countries.

    The introduction of visa restrictions led to a 38% increase in the number of Venezuelan migrants who crossed borders via unauthorised routes, and a 41% rise in migrants without a regular residency permit in their destination country. The number of Venezuelan migrants who lacked legal status in their host country also jumped from less than one-in-five to more than half.

    This shift towards irregularity has had consequences. For example, I found that falling into irregularity led to a shift in migrants’ priorities away from seeking employment and towards trying to regularise their migratory status.

    There is also no evidence to suggest that migrants redirected their journeys to South American countries with more open policies. In fact, the composition of migrants remained largely unchanged after the introduction of restrictions.

    Lessons from Europe

    Before the election, a poll conducted by Venezuelan firm Meganálisis indicated that around 40% of Venezuelans would consider leaving the country if Maduro remained in power. This represents a potentially staggering increase in migration, even if we account for the gap between intention and action.

    To avoid exacerbating an already critical situation, countries in the region must adopt pragmatic policies that prioritise safe and regular migration. And they should offer regular status to migrants that already reside there.

    Europe’s response to the mass displacement caused by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine offers lessons that Latin American governments should not ignore.

    In 2022, the EU coordinated efforts to allow Ukrainian refugees free and safe movement throughout Europe, while also guaranteeing their right to work and residency, as well as access to health and educational services.




    Read more:
    Ukraine war: a year on, here’s what life has been like for refugees in the UK


    Despite the massive scale of this displacement, at over 6 million refugees, there was no widely reported “Ukrainian refugee crisis” because of this cooperative approach.

    Ukrainian refugees entering Romania after crossing the border.
    Pazargic Liviu / Shutterstock

    While the refugee status of Ukrainians in Europe is guaranteed up to February 2026 (and can be extended if the European Council agrees), the story is quite different for displaced Venezuelans. Despite being considered refugees by the UN and the laws of most Latin American countries, governments in the region have largely decided not to recognise them as such.

    Nevertheless, Latin American governments should pursue a strategy similar to the one we have seen in Europe. This must include renewing their commitment to the principles outlined in the Quito Declaration, as well as establishing common standards across the region for the reception of Venezuelan migrants.

    These standards should include the possibility of allowing Venezuelans to cross borders using only their ID cards, as is still the case in Argentina and Brazil, given how costly passports and other travel documents are for many Venezuelans.

    Such requirements would significantly reduce the likelihood of irregular migration and, together with mass regularisation programmes, have a positive impact on the integration of Venezuelans into their host countries.

    As Venezuela continues to grapple with political and economic collapse, the international community – and particularly neighbouring Latin American nations – must be prepared for another surge of migration.

    But the response should not be to close borders or restrict access. Governments must instead coordinate to ensure safe, regular and humane migration routes.

    The future of millions of Venezuelans, as well as the stability of Latin America, depends on the region’s ability to manage this crisis effectively.

    Omar Hammoud Gallego has received funding from the UK Economic and Social Research Council to conduct this research.

    – ref. A new wave of Venezuelan refugees would threaten a humanitarian crisis – Latin America could learn from Europe – https://theconversation.com/a-new-wave-of-venezuelan-refugees-would-threaten-a-humanitarian-crisis-latin-america-could-learn-from-europe-238345

    MIL OSI – Global Reports –

    September 29, 2024
  • MIL-OSI Global: Ukraine drone strikes demonstrate its continuing intent to fight the long war against Russia

    Source: The Conversation – Canada – By James Horncastle, Assistant Professor and Edward and Emily McWhinney Professor in International Relations, Simon Fraser University

    Ukraine recently launched a long-range drone strike on a Russian ammunition depot in the Tver region of Russia. Ukraine followed up the strike with additional drone strikes near Tver and Krasnador.

    These strikes were notable for two reasons. First, the destruction may represent Ukraine’s most successful drone strikes in the current phase of the Russia-Ukraine war.

    Second, Toropets, where the first strike took place, is approximately 480 kilometres from the Russia-Ukraine border.

    The success of the attack has caused considerable elation among Ukraine’s supporters.

    The drone strikes, however, will not fundamentally alter the current battlefield. But they are part of broader efforts by Ukraine to undermine Russia’s ability to wage war. These efforts are unlikely to bear fruit in 2024, but do improve Ukraine’s position for 2025 and potentially beyond.

    The failed search for fast victory

    Both Ukraine and Russia have sought rapid victories in the war.

    Russia, based on captured documents, believed that its invasion in 2022 would only take 10 days to result in total Ukrainian capitulation. Ukrainian resolve and the weaknesses of Russian armed forces, however, doomed this effort.

    Ukraine and its supporters, likewise, placed too much hope in a decisive victory in the 2023 summer offensive. But their hopes were quashed by a Russian army that was not only superior to its 2022 iteration and fighting on the defensive, but also by structural weaknesses in the newly constituted Ukrainian units as well.

    The reality of the Russia-Ukraine war is that rapid and decisive victories for either side are impractical. Instead, both Ukraine and Russia are undertaking efforts to win in 2025 and beyond.

    Russian tactical actions

    Ukraine realized it was in an existential fight from the outset of Russia’s invasion in February 2022. Russian leader Vladimir Putin’s focus on a rapid victory in Ukraine, however, meant Russia was unprepared for a protracted conflict.

    Russia, however, adapted to the prolonged war, using the mercenary Wagner Group to stabilize its position in Ukraine. Russia’s efforts to find soldiers for the war effort included giving the Wagner Group the green light to recruit from Russian prisons.




    Read more:
    Russians flee the draft as the reality of the war in Ukraine hits home


    These efforts, however, were more akin to patching holes in the Russian war effort than addressing its underlying issues. In September 2022, Putin announced a partial mobilization of Russian reservists, totalling 300,000 additional soldiers.

    A Russian recruit and his wife kiss and hug each other outside a military recruitment centre in Volgograd, Russia, in September 2022.
    (AP Photo)

    This mobilization and subsequent recruitment efforts gave Russia the personnel advantages it had at the beginning of the conflict. The reinforcements have allowed Russia to resume grinding offensive operations in the Donbas region of eastern Ukraine. Notably, Russian forces are now nearing the strategic city of Pokrovsk.

    Economic sanctions have affected Russia’s ability to produce high-end weapons. Nevertheless, it’s still able to acquire arms at scale from its domestic arms industry as well as from countries like Iran and North Korea.

    Combined with Russia’s diplomatic offensive in Africa, Putin is not as isolated as western countries commonly believe.

    Ukrainian morale

    The Russia-Ukraine conflict is a war of attrition, and most analyses have assumed that type of war plays to Russia’s advantage given its material superiority. A factor neglected by many analysts in wars of attrition, however, is the importance of morale.

    The Ukrainian government and armed forces have not neglected this crucial point. The recent and ongoing drone strikes help to boost declining Ukrainian morale as the war takes it toll and as hopes of a rapid conclusion have faded, both among Ukrainians themselves and their allies.

    Ukrainian efforts over the summer should be viewed through this morale lens. When doing so, it also becomes evident that Ukraine is fighting the long war versus seeking decisive victories.

    None of Ukraine’s major efforts over the summer, when viewed in isolation, have a serious chance of changing the war in a significant manner. The Ukrainian army’s occupation of parts of the Kursk region this summer brought the conflict to Russian territory. The amount of territory taken by Ukraine, however, is negligible.

    Each operation improves Ukraine’s ability to fight a protracted war, however, while simultaneously undermining Russia’s material and moral resources. They also boost the country’s morale while humiliating Putin at the same time.

    Long-term vision

    Russia staked considerable political capital and material benefits in acquiring support in Africa through the Wagner Group.

    Ukrainian special operation forces efforts in Africa against the Wagner Group undermine Russia’s ability to acquire diplomatic support and other resources.




    Read more:
    Ukrainian special operations abroad are part of its broader war effort against Russia


    Ukraine’s drone strikes will not alter Russian military supplies in a permanent way. But the strikes, using domestically produced drones, creates pressure on Ukraine’s allies to allow western weapons to be used with potentially greater effect.

    The daily news cycle focuses on the importance of individual acts. In assessing how the conflict is developing, however, it’s important to understand how these acts, ranging from drone strikes to ground offensives, are connected to an overall strategy. Each is designed to improve Ukraine’s position while undermining Russia’s during a protracted war.

    James Horncastle does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    – ref. Ukraine drone strikes demonstrate its continuing intent to fight the long war against Russia – https://theconversation.com/ukraine-drone-strikes-demonstrate-its-continuing-intent-to-fight-the-long-war-against-russia-239438

    MIL OSI – Global Reports –

    September 29, 2024
  • MIL-OSI United Nations: Readout of the Secretary-General’s meeting with H.E. Mr. Andrej Plenković, Prime Minister of the Republic of Croatia

    Source: United Nations MIL-OSI 2

    he Secretary-General met with H.E. Mr. Andrej Plenković, Prime Minister of the Republic of Croatia. 

    The Secretary-General and the Prime Minister exchanged views on the Summit of the Future. They also discussed the war in Ukraine and its regional impact, as well as developments in the Western Balkans.

    MIL OSI United Nations News –

    September 29, 2024
  • MIL-OSI: Force for Good: UN’s Sustainable Development Goals at risk of being missed – 9 urgent actions needed to unlock progress as cost of SDG gap rises by 10% to US$112-136 trillion

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    • A new report from Force for Good – “Capital as a Force for Good: Shifting the Global Order Through the Mass Mobilization of Solutions” – finds urgent action is needed now to unlock progress and achieve the SDGs
    • It identifies ‘Nine Big Ideas’ that, if scaled globally, have the potential to unlock SDG progress from less than 66% today, to nearly 90% by the end of the decade, helping correct the annual SDG funding gap of US$14-17 trillion
    • Ideas include climate transition frameworks, AI-enabled connectivity, and universal digital financial services, through coordinated action across governments, the private sector and multi-lateral institutions, proposing a high-impact roll-out across the world

    LONDON, Sept. 23, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Force For Good: The world is failing to meet the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and urgent action is needed to unlock progress and overcome the growing annual SDG funding gap, which now stands at US$14-17 trillion, a new report from Force for Good finds, US$112-136 trillion in total, up 10%, due to the costs of global climate transition and development needs in the Global South.

    Today, only 16% of the goal’s 169 underlying targets are on track to be met by 2030, with 50% falling behind, and 30% regressing below their 2015 levels when the SDGs were kicked off, the report finds.

    Nine ‘Big Ideas’, including climate transition frameworks, AI-enabled connectivity, and universal digital financial services, if scaled globally, have the cumulative potential to progress SDG achievement to nearly 90%, from less than 66% today, reigniting exponential progress.

    “This report shows how the global order and the systems itself can be transformed by delivering solutions en masse across the planet, engaging everyone in this endeavour … By leveraging the strengths of governments, private companies, NGOS and mobilising the individual as an agent of change, we can create a sustainable, secure, and prosperous future,” said Ketan Patel, Chair of the Advisory Council.

    The world’s failure to meet the goals is being driven by a series of interrelated economic, political, geopolitical and environmental shocks – including the COVID-19 pandemic, the war in Ukraine and Gaza, the energy, cost-of-living and climate crises – interacting with one another to create a ‘polycrisis’ that is diverting attention and resources away from sustainable development.

    A mass and fast roll out of the ‘Nine Big Ideas’, sponsored by appropriate champions across government, private sector or multi-lateral institutions, working with the United Nations, can make a transformative impact on developing countries, while benefitting the global economy.

    While the mass mobilisation of solutions will take a global effort, the largest developing countries, particularly India, China, and Brazil, account for two-thirds of the world’s sustainable development potential. These countries represent the first wave of opportunity in a multi-wave project to realize the future faster.

    Meeting the SDGs is a crucial step for the world in the transition to the next era of human civilization, building a platform on which further breakthroughs and technologies can create a sustainable, secure and superior future.

    About Force for Good

    Force for Good’s mission is to mobilize capital, resources, and ideas as a force for good in the world at a time of profound change. The organization’s Capital as a Force for Good Initiative engages the world’s leading financial institutions and other stakeholders, to promote sustainable development through the deployment of capital and solutions to address global issues and enable the transition to a better future.

    The annual Capital as a Force for Good report, now in its fourth edition, is the result of collaboration with the United Nations and major global financial institutions, assessing the role of capital in addressing the world’s most pressing issues.

    Institutions actively engaged include Bank of America, BlackRock, Bridgewater Associates, Citi, Credit Suisse, Fidelity Investments, First Abu Dhabi Bank, GIC Singapore, Goldman Sachs, Great-West Lifeco, HDFC Bank, HSBC, Investec Group, Japan Post Holdings, JPMorgan Chase, Liberty Mutual Insurance Group, Lloyds Banking Group, Morgan Stanley, Nomura, Nordea, Northern Trust, OMERS, Putnam Investments, Schroders, State Street, UBS, Wellington, and others.

    For further details, please visit www.forcegood.org

    CONTACTS

    Force For Good Contact:
    Lesley Whittle
    Lesley.whittle@forcegood.org

    *ESG News is a proud supporter of Force for Good

    The MIL Network –

    September 29, 2024
  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Rising Russian gas imports undermine European plans to become independent of Russian gas – E-001376/2024(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    Russian gas imports did not rise over the period 2022-24. On an annual basis the EU has significantly reduced its imports of Russian gas from ca. 150 billion cubic meters (bcm) before 2021 and the beginning of the gas crisis, to 45 bcm in 2023[1].

    T he EU Energy Platform including its AggregateEU mechanism contributed to the security and diversification of gas supplies to the EU and Energy Community, and increased market transparency[2].

    The expiry of the Russian gas transit agreement through Ukraine at the end of 2024 would contribute further to phasing out Russian fossil fuel dependence by halting imports via Ukraine.

    Demand reduction measures contributed to reducing the gas demand by 18% between August 2022 and May 2024. Unprecedented development of renewables has been achieved. Wind and solar capacity have increased by 36% between 2021 and 2023, saving the equivalent of 24 bcm gas over 2 years .

    The Commission continues to implement the REPowerEU plan[3], including through limited financing to gas projects by the Connecting Europe Facility and the Recovery and Resilience Facility.

    New projects will help diversify supplies, such as the Adriatica Line, Gdansk LNG terminal and Gdańsk-Gustorzyn pipeline, the expansion of Krk LNG Terminal, Romanian Black Sea Gas exploitation or Trans-Balkan pipeline reverse flow, which the Commission has facilitated through the work of the CESEC High-Level Group.

    • [1] To compensate, the EU replaced Russian gas supply with imports from other international suppliers. Norway and the United States became the EU’s largest gas suppliers, representing 34% (47 bcm) and 18% (25 bcm), respectively of EU gas imports in the first five months of 2024, followed by North Africa, Azerbaijan and Qatar.
    • [2] https://energy.ec.europa.eu/topics/energy-security/eu-energy-platform_en
    • [3] https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal/repowereu-affordable-secure-and-sustainable-energy-europe_en
    Last updated: 23 September 2024

    MIL OSI Europe News –

    September 29, 2024
  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Turkey – an unreliable acceding country – E-001429/2024(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    Türkiye is a candidate country, a key regional player and a North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) member. Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine has highlighted Türkiye’s relevance as a regional actor, especially in the Black Sea.

    Türkiye has supported the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine, voting in favour of the relevant resolutions at the United Nations (UN) General Assembly, engaged politically, economically and diplomatically, facilitating the export of Ukrainian grain and prisoner exchanges.

    In August 2024, Türkiye ratified the free trade agreement with Ukraine[1]. While a strategic partner for Ukraine in the defence sector, Türkiye maintains strong trade, economic and political relations with Russia.

    Türkiye has refrained from aligning with the EU’s restrictive measures against Russia, keeping its position of not supporting those adopted outside the UN framework.

    As the EU and Türkiye share a customs union, the EU has called consistently on Türkiye to implement additional measures to effectively prevent the circumvention of EU restrictive measures and this has led to some progress.

    Türkiye took some measures throughout 2023 to prevent the transit and re-export of sanctioned goods to Russia notably what concerns the items in the common high priority (CHP/battlefield) list of 50 harmonised system (HS) codes.

    The Commission continues to actively monitor the trade data and exchanging with Türkiye. The EU Sanctions Envoy leads the cooperation efforts, latest discussed with Türkiye at the High-Level Dialogue on Trade (8 July 2024)[2].

    In its 2023 enlargement report[3], the EU called on Türkiye, as a candidate country, to align with the EU’s restrictive measures against Russia.

    • [1] https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2024/08/20240802.pdf (Türkiye’s Official Gazette, Law no. 7523).
    • [2] https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/statement_24_3684
    • [3] https://neighbourhood-enlargement.ec.europa.eu/document/download/eb90aefd-897b-43e9-8373-bf59c239217f_en?filename=SWD_2023_696%20T%C3%BCrkiye%20report.pdf

    MIL OSI Europe News –

    September 29, 2024
  • MIL-OSI Economics: Piero Cipollone: From dependency to autonomy: the role of a digital euro in the European payment landscape

    Source: European Central Bank

    Introductory statement by Piero Cipollone, Member of the Executive Board of the ECB, at the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs of the European Parliament

    Brussels, 23 September 2024

    It is a pleasure to be here today to meet the new members of this Committee and to update you on the status of the digital euro project. Let me also congratulate Madame Lalucq on her election as ECON Chair.

    The ECB appreciates the open and valuable exchanges we have had with the ECON Committee on the digital euro since the beginning of the project. I am fully committed to continuing these exchanges and look forward to our future discussions.

    Today I will focus on three key areas. First, Europe’s dependency on foreign players for retail payments. Second, the benefits of a digital euro for everyone, including consumers, merchants and banks. And third, the progress we have made on the digital euro project so far.

    Foreign dominance in the European payment landscape

    Fast-forward to the year 2030. Imagine you are at the football World Cup in Spain. You want to buy a drink, but you can only pay with Alipay. This scenario is not as far-fetched as it may seem: this summer, buying tickets for the European Football Championships in Germany was only possible with Chinese or American means of payment.

    Could you imagine this happening in the United States? Going to the finals of the American football league, for example, and having no American means of payment available? I certainly cannot.

    The Eurosystem will of course continue to ensure that people in Europe can pay with cash.[1] However, cash is becoming less and less popular as digital payments and online shopping grow.[2]

    For example, more and more people are buying their groceries online. But you can’t use cash to pay for these. More often than not, the only option is PayPal or an international card scheme like Visa or Mastercard.

    And more and more people are using digital wallets like PayPal or Apple Pay on their mobile phones. By 2027 these platforms are expected to handle 40% of e-commerce and 27% of in-store payments in Europe.[3]

    At the same time, the share of companies in the euro area not accepting cash has been increasing significantly.[4]

    These developments are contributing to the marginalisation of elderly and less tech-savvy people. They also make us dependent on non-European companies, which is risky.

    Imagine what would happen if you could not pay digitally. For example, two weeks ago significant parts of the European card payments market were shut down for almost an entire day.[5] Just like with electricity, gas or water, we don’t think about payments until they stop working. For energy, we had to learn this the hard way following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. For payments, we owe it to Europeans to do better.

    We need our own strong digital payments system.[6] We can achieve this by bringing central bank money into the digital era with the introduction of a digital euro: a digital form of cash, issued by the central bank and available to everyone in the euro area.[7]

    A digital euro would strengthen Europe’s financial sovereignty and resilience because it would be built with European technology and infrastructure. It would empower Europe to independently develop and manage digital payment solutions, supporting the further deepening of the Single Market.[8]

    But most importantly, the digital euro would offer tangible benefits to all stakeholders – consumers, merchants and banks.

    Benefits for European citizens

    We strongly support the Single Currency Package[9], which will ensure that cash remains widely accessible and accepted. At the same time, it will pave the way for a digital euro, which would take the advantages of cash into the digital world.

    Consumers could use a digital euro for all payments, everywhere in the euro area, also when shopping online. With a digital euro, making or receiving payments would be free of charge and as easy as using cash today. Consumers would need to use only one device and remember just one password. In addition, having a single means of payment for all circumstances would make it easier for users to have an overview of their expenditure.

    Importantly, a digital euro would seek to promote digital financial inclusion by ensuring that no one is left behind.[10] It would be accessible to everyone across the euro area, via a mobile app or a physical card, so everyone can choose the technology that they are most comfortable with, no matter how old or tech-savvy they are.

    Finally, a digital euro would offer the best possible privacy and data protection afforded by the current technology used in large payment systems.[11] From the outset, ensuring user privacy has been a central focus of the digital euro project.

    A digital euro would be available both online and offline.[12] With the offline functionality, users would enjoy cash-like privacy. The details of your offline payments would only be known to you and the recipient. For online payments, too, we would ensure that your personal data remain your own. The Eurosystem will not be able to identify you, nor directly link you to your payments.[13]

    New opportunities for merchants

    A digital euro would also bring new opportunities for European merchants.

    Right now, merchants in Europe are largely dependent on a handful of dominant online or card payment methods, often relying on non-European providers. International card schemes currently account for 64% of card transactions in the euro area.[14]

    This costs European merchants a lot of money. They collectively pay a significant amount each year to international card schemes like Visa or Mastercard. And the cost is mostly borne by smaller merchants, who incur charges three to four times higher than those of their larger competitors.[15]

    A digital euro would include safeguards for merchants by capping the fees they pay to banks for processing payments.[16] A digital euro would thus narrow the gap between what smaller and larger merchants are charged for digital payments.

    By providing a true alternative to existing payment solutions, a digital euro would also put all merchants, large and small, in a stronger position to negotiate better conditions with other providers. Finally, it could provide a safety net for merchants in case of network or power outages, thanks to its offline functionality.[17]

    Benefits for banks

    Banks would benefit too, particularly in our rapidly evolving payment landscape, in which new players – especially big tech companies from outside Europe – are increasingly entering the market. The banks would be remunerated for the services they offer, while the Eurosystem would cover the costs of the digital euro scheme and infrastructure.

    When you compare a digital euro with services like PayPal or Apple Pay, the benefits for banks become even clearer. For instance, banks do not earn anything if people top up their PayPal wallet via direct debit. And with Apple Pay, banks actually have to pay a fee just to let their cards be used in Apple Wallet.

    A digital euro would also open up a new source of revenue by allowing banks to provide value-added services to their customers.[18]

    We are working closely with the market to ensure that a digital euro leverages the existing standards as much as possible, which would keep costs down and support Europe’s competitive payment landscape.[19]

    Moreover, cards and applications currently available in only one or a handful of Member States could use these standards to reach customers across the euro area without the need to invest in new acceptance infrastructure. Therefore, a digital euro would mean that European payment service providers could offer their customers the convenience of using their product everywhere in the euro area – just like international card companies. It would also strengthen banks’ negotiating positions vis-à-vis these companies.

    Finally, banks and other payment service providers would be responsible for distributing a digital euro, thus serving as the sole point of contact for digital euro users. So a digital euro could help banks retain their customers in the face of growing payments competition.

    Project preparation phase at full speed

    Let me now give you a brief update on where we stand with the project.[20]

    We started the investigation phase back in 2021 and are now at the midpoint of the preparation phase, with roughly one more year to go.

    One of our key focus areas during this phase is to develop a methodology for determining the maximum amount of digital euro a person could hold at any time.[21] The holding limits are important to ensure financial stability and prevent large-scale transfers from bank deposits to digital euro, especially during crises.

    These limits would be high enough to avoid negatively affecting the digital euro user experience.[22]

    Experts from the ECB, the national central banks in the Eurosystem and national competent authorities, building on their unique know-how, have started to identify the factors that could influence the holding limit calibration, on the basis of three key areas defined in the draft Regulation: usability, monetary policy and financial stability.[23]

    While the exact holding limits would be defined closer to the potential launch and on the basis of a well-defined governance process enshrined in the draft Regulation,[the ECB’s Governing Council will decide whether to move to the next phase of the project. But the Governing Council will not take any decision about the issuance of a digital euro before the legislative act has been adopted.

    Conclusion

    To conclude, introducing a digital euro across the euro area would take time, but it is key for Europe’s future. Countries across the world are exploring retail central bank digital currencies. If we want to be standard-setters and keep our position among the frontrunners, we need to move swiftly.

    A digital euro is a common European project, which is why we are talking to all the relevant stakeholders and carefully listening to their views and concerns. I also remain committed to engaging regularly with the European Parliament.

    Introducing a digital euro that all banks and other providers make available to their customers and that all merchants accept, everywhere in the euro area, would take several years. Market participants need certainty to invest in the digital euro and this requires coordination between co-legislators and the central bank.

    I appreciate all the work that the ECON Committee has done on the digital euro so far. The legislative discussions are now in your hands. The ECB is of course ready to engage with the negotiating team and to provide continued technical support when needed.

    It is important that the legislative and technical work advance in parallel, swiftly and in close cooperation. Together, we can ensure that the digital euro strengthens Europe’s financial sovereignty and serves all its citizens.

    MIL OSI Economics –

    September 29, 2024
  • MIL-OSI United Nations: Readout of the Secretary-General’s meeting with H.E. Mr. Peter Pellegrini, President of the Slovak Republic

    Source: United Nations secretary general

    The Secretary-General met with H.E. Mr. Peter Pellegrini, President of the Slovak Republic. The Secretary-General and the President discussed the Pact for the Future, digital technologies and artificial intelligence. They also exchanged views on climate action, the impacts of the war in Ukraine and other international developments.
     
     

    MIL OSI United Nations News –

    September 29, 2024
  • MIL-OSI United Nations: Readout of the Secretary-General’s meeting with H.E. Mr. Andrzej Duda, President of the Republic of Poland

    Source: United Nations secretary general

    The Secretary-General met with H.E. Mr. Andrzej Duda, President of the Republic of Poland.
     
    The Secretary-General and the President discussed the war in Ukraine. They also exchanged views on the outcomes of the Summit of the Future.

    MIL OSI United Nations News –

    September 29, 2024
  • MIL-OSI Video: Lebanon, Occupied Palestinian territory, Gaza & other topics – Daily Press Briefing (23 Sep 2024)

    Source: United Nations (Video News)

    Noon briefing by Stéphane Dujarric, Spokesperson for the Secretary-General.

    Highlights:
    -Lebanon
    -Lebanon/humanitarian
    -Occupied Palestinian territory
    -Gaza
    -Syria
    -Sudan
    -Ukraine
    -Summit of the Future
    -Afghanistan
    -Briefings
    -SDG Media Zone
    -Week by the numbers
    -Day of Sign Languages

    LEBANON
    The Secretary-General is indeed alarmed by the escalating situation along the Blue Line. He’s very concerned about the large number of civilian casualties being reported by the Lebanese authorities, as well as the thousands of displaced persons, amidst the most intense exchange of fire across the Blue Line since October of last year.
    He expresses grave concern for the safety of civilians both in southern Lebanon and in Northern Israel, as well as the UN staff in those areas.
    The Secretary-General notes the ongoing efforts by the UN Special Coordinator for Lebanon and the UN Peacekeeping Force in Lebanon to reduce tensions and reiterates the urgent need for de-escalation and that all efforts be devoted to a diplomatic solution. Our Special Coordinator for Lebanon, Jeannine Hennis-Plasschaert, is currently in Israel where she is meeting with Israeli officials as we speak to discuss the latest situation.
    Meanwhile the Head of Mission and Force Commander, Lt. Gen. Aroldo Lázaro, has been in contact with both Lebanese and Israeli parties, emphasizing the urgent need for de-escalation. Efforts are ongoing to reduce tensions and halt the shelling.
    Their message from both the Special Coordinator and the Head of the UN Peacekeeping Force is the same, which is there is no military solution that will make either side safer. With the wellbeing of civilians on both sides of the Blue Line and the stability of the region at stake, space must be given for diplomatic efforts to succeed.
    All involved parties in this conflict must honour their responsibilities to protect civilians and ensure the safety and security of all UN personnel and assets.
    The Secretary-General urges all parties to recommit to the full implementation of Security Council resolution 1701 and immediately return to a cessation of hostilities and to restore stability. We do expect a more official statement to be issued at some point.

    LEBANON/HUMANITARIAN
    On the humanitarian front, our Humanitarian Coordinator for Lebanon Imran Riza, met with Lebanese Government officials, including the Prime Minister, Najib Miqati, and the Minister of Environment, Nasser Yassin. Our humanitarian agencies and others also participated in those discussion.
    At these talks, the Lebanese Government announced the activation of an emergency operations centre and also that schools ought to be designated as shelters. The Ministry of Education in Lebanon had announced the closure of all public and private schools for tomorrow. Many people are being displaced from areas impacted by the airstrikes, with heavy traffic reported toward Beirut and Mount Lebanon regions.
    Also, on the Israeli side, during the weekend and following an uptick of hostilities, Israel’s Military Home Command announced that schools in northern Israel, which run from Sunday to Friday, have been closed until at least today until 6 p.m. local time.
    Humanitarian organizations urgently need $50 million to preposition basic needs – such as food and shelter supplies – for an immediate response for the next two to four weeks in southern Lebanon, Lebanon in general.
    Our colleagues at OCHA tell us that, according to the Lebanese Ministry of Public Health, more than 274 people have been killed and at least 700 injured, including women and children, following the continued airstrikes in southern Lebanon.

    Full Highlights: https://www.un.org/sg/en/content/noon-briefing-highlight?date%5Bvalue%5D%5Bdate%5D=23%20September%202024

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SSEfoCRWQhE

    MIL OSI Video –

    September 29, 2024
  • MIL-OSI USA: ICYMI: Sullivan Urges Biden to Stand Up to Iran at UNGA

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Alaska Dan Sullivan
    09.23.24
    WASHINGTON—In an opinion published in the Wall Street Journal over the weekend, U.S. Senator Dan Sullivan (R-Alaska), a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee (SASC), condemned the Biden-Harris administration for abandoning the Trump administration’s policies towards Iran, resulting in a more powerful Iran and a more dangerous world. Senator Sullivan urged President Biden to course correct this week during what will likely be the President’s last major foreign policy speech. Tomorrow, President Biden is set to address the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA).
    “It’s hard to deny that the world is more dangerous today than when he [Biden] became president,” Sen. Sullivan writes in the Wall Street Journal. “There are many reasons for this, but the single most important course correction Mr. Biden could make is on his Middle East policy. In his speech he should call on the U.N. to condemn and impose sanctions on the Iranian terrorist regime for acting as the architect of chaos throughout the Middle East and Ukraine.  Mr. Biden should also denounce the antisemitism that has pervaded the U.N. for decades and call out the organization for insufficiently condemning Hamas’s massacre of 1,200 Israelis. He should demand that the U.N. declare Iran-backed Hamas a terrorist organization. He also needs to denounce the U.N. Relief and Works Agency, some of whose employees participated in Hamas’s Oct. 7 attacks. Unfortunately, none of this is likely to happen. Appeasing Iran has been a hallmark of the Biden-Harris administration, and as a result the terrorist leadership has become richer, more powerful and more menacing.”
    Senator Sullivan has frequently warned of the Biden-Harris administration’s weakness on Middle East policy and pushed for a return to Trump-era sanctions aimed at re-establishing deterrence against Iran and its terrorist proxies. His latest op-ed in the Wall Street Journal details many of those efforts. Click here or below to read the full opinion.

    Opinion: Biden’s Last Opportunity to Stand Up to Iran
    By: U.S. Senator Dan Sullivan
    September 20, 2024
    On Monday I will go to New York with a group of senators to meet with foreign leaders at the United Nations General Assembly. President Biden will likely give his last major foreign-policy speech on Tuesday, a final opportunity to correct course. It’s hard to deny that the world is more dangerous today than when he became president. There are many reasons for this, but the single most important course correction Mr. Biden could make is on his Middle East policy.
    In his speech he should call on the U.N. to condemn and impose sanctions on the Iranian terrorist regime for acting as the architect of chaos throughout the Middle East and Ukraine.
    . . .
    Before Mr. Biden took office, under the Trump administration’s sanctions, Iran’s oil exports in 2020 were reduced to about 200,000 barrels a day from 2.7 million and its foreign reserves to roughly $4 billion from $122.5 billion. The Trump administration negotiated the Abraham Accords, the Middle East’s first peace agreement in 26 years, which could put the region on a path to widespread peace.
    The Biden-Harris administration chose not to enforce the Trump-era sanctions. As a result, Iran has been enriched with about $100 billion in oil revenue, with which Tehran funds, trains and equips the Houthis, Hamas and Hezbollah.
    In a meeting with Mr. Biden last year, I raised the issue of reinstating Trump-era sanctions against Iran. He supported the idea and told me to work with Jake Sullivan, his national security adviser. It hasn’t happened.
    …
    The Houthis, with intelligence from Iranian navy spy ships, have launched dozens of drones and missiles to sink U.S. Navy and commercial ships in the Red Sea. Senior military officials operating in the Middle East requested permission to sink these Iranian spy ships but were denied by senior administration officials. They argued that such actions would be “escalatory.” This is a case study in self-deterrence.
    There is a precedent for the U.S. to sink Iranian warships that target our Navy. In 1988, President Ronald Reagan authorized Operation Praying Mantis in retaliation after Iran nearly sank a U.S. Navy ship in the Persian Gulf. By the end of the operation, our military sank several Iranian ships and destroyed two Iranian oil platforms. Tehran got the message.
    The most outrageous example of appeasement has been the Biden-Harris administration’s relative silence on the Iranian regime’s atrocious human-rights record, particularly against women. When Iran’s “morality police” murdered 22-year-old Mahsa Amini two years ago for not properly wearing her hijab, tens of thousands of Iranians, mostly women, took to the streets. More than 22,000 people have been arrested and more than 530 put to death. I wrote Secretary of State Antony Blinken, urging him to meet with Masih Alinejad, one of the courageous leaders of the Woman, Life, Freedom movement. He refuses to do so.
    . . .
    The administration’s policy toward Iran has dangerous repercussions across the globe. When U.N. member nations refused to reinstate the multilateral sanctions on Iran’s ballistic missiles, the White House didn’t protest. Now Iran is sending missiles to Russia to use against Ukraine.
    The Biden-Harris administration’s appeasement has squandered America’s progress against Iran. The Trump administration punished the regime with maximum sanctions, killed Quds Force Commander Qassem Soleimani, and spearheaded the Abraham Accords. History has shown time and again that appeasement doesn’t work and invites more aggression. We should learn from history.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    September 29, 2024
  • MIL-OSI Video: Secretary Blinken hosts a G7+ Ministerial Meeting on Ukraine Energy Sector Support

    Source: United States of America – Department of State (video statements)

    Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken hosts a G7+ Ministerial Meeting on Ukraine Energy Sector Support in New York City, New York, on September 23, 2024.

    Transcript: https://www.state.gov/secretary-antony-j-blinken-with-italian-foreign-minister-antonio-tajani-and-ukrainian-foreign-minister-andrii-sybiha-at-a-g7-ministerial-meeting-on-ukraine-energy-sector-support/

    ———-
    Under the leadership of the President and Secretary of State, the U.S. Department of State leads America’s foreign policy through diplomacy, advocacy, and assistance by advancing the interests of the American people, their safety and economic prosperity. On behalf of the American people we promote and demonstrate democratic values and advance a free, peaceful, and prosperous world.

    The Secretary of State, appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate, is the President’s chief foreign affairs adviser. The Secretary carries out the President’s foreign policies through the State Department, which includes the Foreign Service, Civil Service and U.S. Agency for International Development.

    Get updates from the U.S. Department of State at www.state.gov and on social media!
    Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/statedept
    Twitter: https://twitter.com/StateDept
    Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/statedept
    Flickr: https://flickr.com/photos/statephotos/

    Subscribe to the State Department Blog: https://www.state.gov/blogs
    Watch on-demand State Department videos: https://video.state.gov/
    Subscribe to The Week at State e-newsletter: http://ow.ly/diiN30ro7Cw

    State Department website: https://www.state.gov/
    Careers website: https://careers.state.gov/
    White House website: https://www.whitehouse.gov/

    #StateDepartment #DepartmentofState #Diplomacy

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YUQL0C0F1yg

    MIL OSI Video –

    September 29, 2024
  • MIL-OSI: Ellomay Capital Announces Execution of An Agreement for the Sale of Tax Credits of Texas Solar Projects

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Tel-Aviv, Israel, Sept. 23, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) —  Ellomay Capital Ltd. (NYSE American; TASE: ELLO) (“Ellomay” or the “Company”), a renewable energy and power generator and developer of renewable energy and power projects in Europe, Israel and the USA, today announced a key achievement in its U.S. strategic growth plan. The Company has successfully entered into an agreement for the sale and transfer of Investment Tax Credits (ITCs) linked to its Fairfield (13.4 MW), Malakoff (13.92 MW), Mexia (11.1 MW), and Talco (10.5 MW) solar projects, all located in the State of Texas, USA. The agreement was executed with a reputable financial institution, with vast experience in executing tax credit transactions.

    Through this transaction, the Company expects to receive approximately $19 million from the sale of Investment Tax Credits, representing approximately 32% of the expected total portfolio costs. The sale is facilitated under the Inflation Reduction Act’s new transferability provisions, allowing Ellomay to retain 100% of the operating profits from these projects. Funds from the sale of the ITCs generated from a project will be disbursed after such project is placed in service and meets the applicable requirements. The Company expects the Fairfield and Malakoff projects to be placed in service by the end of Q4 2024, and the Mexia and Talco projects to be placed in service by the end of Q2 2025. The agreement includes customary indemnification obligations (for damages not covered by tax insurance policy), including in connection with certain continued eligibility requirements and scope of the ITCs, for which the Company provided a guarantee to the purchaser of the ITCs.

    Ran Fridrich, CEO and a board member of Ellomay, said “The agreement to sell the Investment Tax Credits to an institutional buyer represents a major milestone in the development of Ellomay’s solar portfolio in Texas and underscores the Company’s commitment to expanding its renewable energy presence in the U.S. The Company sees great importance in its ability to sell the ITCs while maintaining the benefits of accelerated depreciation in the Company. The Company believes that additional projects in the pipeline will be able to follow a similar strategy.”

    About Ellomay Capital Ltd.

    Ellomay is an Israeli based company whose shares are listed on the NYSE American and the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange under the trading symbol “ELLO”. Since 2009, Ellomay Capital focuses its business in the renewable energy and power sectors in Europe, USA and Israel.

    To date, Ellomay has evaluated numerous opportunities and invested significant funds in the renewable, clean energy and natural resources industries in Israel, Italy, Spain, the Netherlands and Texas, USA, including:

    • Approximately 335.9 MW of operating photovoltaic power plants in Spain (including a 300 MW photovoltaic plant in owned by Talasol, which is 51% owned by the Company) and approximately 20 MW of operating photovoltaic power plants in Italy;
    • 9.375% indirect interest in Dorad Energy Ltd., which owns and operates one of Israel’s largest private power plants with production capacity of approximately 850MW, representing about 6%-8% of Israel’s total current electricity consumption;
    • Groen Gas Goor B.V., Groen Gas Oude-Tonge B.V. and Groen Gas Gelderland B.V., project companies operating anaerobic digestion plants in the Netherlands, with a green gas production capacity of approximately 3 million, 3.8 million and 9.5 million Nm3 per year, respectively;
    • 83.333% of Ellomay Pumped Storage (2014) Ltd., which is involved in a project to construct a 156 MW pumped storage hydro power plant in the Manara Cliff, Israel;
    • Ellomay Solar Italy Ten SRL that is construction a photovoltaic plant (18 MW) in Italy;
    • Ellomay Solar Italy Four SRL (15.06 MW), Ellomay Solar Italy Five SRL (87.2 MW), Ellomay Solar Italy Seven SRL (54.77 MW), Ellomay Solar Italy Nine SRL (8 MW) and Ellomay Solar Italy Fifteen SRL (10 MW) that are developing photovoltaic projects in Italy that have reached “ready to build” status; and
    • Fairfield Solar Project, LLC (13.44 MW), Malakoff Solar I, LLC (6.96 MW) and Malakoff Solar II, LLC (6.96 MW), that are constructing photovoltaic plants and Mexia Solar I, LLC (5.6 MW), Mexia Solar II, LLC (5.6 MW), and Talco Solar, LLC (10.3 MW), that are developing photovoltaic projects that have reached “ready to build” status, all in the Dallas Metropolitan area, Texas.

    For more information about Ellomay, visit http://www.ellomay.com.

    Information Relating to Forward-Looking Statements

    This press release contains forward-looking statements that involve substantial risks and uncertainties, including statements that are based on the current expectations and assumptions of the Company’s management. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, included in this press release regarding the Company’s plans and objectives, expectations and assumptions of management are forward-looking statements. The use of certain words, including the words “estimate,” “project,” “intend,” “expect,” “believe” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The Company may not actually achieve the plans, intentions or expectations disclosed in the forward-looking statements and you should not place undue reliance on the Company’s forward-looking statements. Various important factors could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those that may be expressed or implied by the Company’s forward-looking statements, including the delays or failure in placing into service of any or all of the Texas solar facilities, failure to meet the continued eligibility requirements for the ITCs, changes in the markets and economy, changes in electricity prices and demand, continued war and hostilities in Israel and Gaza, regulatory changes, including extension of current or approval of new rules and regulations increasing the operating expenses of manufacturers of renewable energy in Spain, increases in interest rates and inflation, changes in the supply and prices of resources required for the operation of the Company’s facilities (such as waste and natural gas) and in the price of oil, the impact of continued military conflict between Russia and Ukraine, technical and other disruptions in the operations or construction of the power plants owned by the Company and general market, political and economic conditions in the countries in which the Company operates, including Israel, Spain, Italy and the United States. These and other risks and uncertainties associated with the Company’s business are described in greater detail in the filings the Company makes from time to time with Securities and Exchange Commission, including its Annual Report on Form 20-F. The forward-looking statements are made as of this date and the Company does not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

    Contact:
    Kalia Rubenbach (Weintraub)
    CFO
    Tel: +972 (3) 797-1111
    Email: hilai@ellomay.com

    The MIL Network –

    September 29, 2024
  • MIL-OSI USA: Remarks as Prepared for Delivery by First Lady Jill  Biden at the United Nations General Assembly’s Summit of First Ladies and  Gentlemen

    US Senate News:

    Source: The White House
    New York City, New York
    Thank you, Ambassador.
    I’m grateful for your leadership and tireless work.
    It’s an honor to be here.
    Mrs. Zelenska—Olena—when I found out that you were gathering this group of leaders, including the incredible First Ladies here to my left, I knew I had to show my support, even if briefly.
    You and I met more than two years ago in Ukraine after Putin’s invasion.
    We walked through a public school that had been converted into a shelter—a place of learning forced to become a refuge from war.
    I saw the tears of mothers, permanently brimming on the edges of their eyes.
    The slope of their shoulders.
    The tension in their bodies.
    The way they reached for their children’s hands or touched their hair as if they couldn’t bear to lose connection, even for a moment.
    The Ukrainian mothers I met are never far from my mind.
    We continue to stand with them and with all the people of Ukraine.
    The past several years have been a painful reminder that when children are in danger anywhere in the world, they are more vulnerable everywhere.
    But the reverse is also true.
    Seeing the plight of children at home helps us see the challenges that children face across the world—and then we can share our resources and solutions to make all of them safer.
    As an educator, I know that when one student has a breakthrough, they lift up the entire class.
    I also know that when we support schools, we strengthen homes and neighborhoods.
    And defending our children today, allows us to fight for their future.
    A future where they learn, play, and explore without fear, no matter where they live.
    Where they can build the promise of long, flourishing lives.
    And where mothers can stand with clear eyes, shoulders at ease, trusting that their beloved children will come back to them safe.
    Mrs. Karis—Sirje—and Olena, I’m so grateful that you’ve brought us together to lay the foundation for that future.
    I know it will be stronger because of our partnerships.
    Olena, we continue to admire your selfless courage.
    Amid such suffering at home, it would have been enough for you to just speak out for the people of Ukraine.
    But you chose to look beyond your borders, calling on world leaders to see our shared challenges with new clarity and boldness.
    We’re here to offer our continued love and support to you.
    We stand with Ukraine today and for the future. 

    MIL OSI USA News –

    September 29, 2024
  • MIL-OSI USA News: Remarks as Prepared for Delivery by First Lady Jill  Biden at the United Nations General Assembly’s Summit of First Ladies and  Gentlemen

    Source: The White House

    New York City, New York

    Thank you, Ambassador.

    I’m grateful for your leadership and tireless work.

    It’s an honor to be here.

    Mrs. Zelenska—Olena—when I found out that you were gathering this group of leaders, including the incredible First Ladies here to my left, I knew I had to show my support, even if briefly.

    You and I met more than two years ago in Ukraine after Putin’s invasion.

    We walked through a public school that had been converted into a shelter—a place of learning forced to become a refuge from war.

    I saw the tears of mothers, permanently brimming on the edges of their eyes.

    The slope of their shoulders.

    The tension in their bodies.

    The way they reached for their children’s hands or touched their hair as if they couldn’t bear to lose connection, even for a moment.

    The Ukrainian mothers I met are never far from my mind.

    We continue to stand with them and with all the people of Ukraine.

    The past several years have been a painful reminder that when children are in danger anywhere in the world, they are more vulnerable everywhere.

    But the reverse is also true.

    Seeing the plight of children at home helps us see the challenges that children face across the world—and then we can share our resources and solutions to make all of them safer.

    As an educator, I know that when one student has a breakthrough, they lift up the entire class.

    I also know that when we support schools, we strengthen homes and neighborhoods.

    And defending our children today, allows us to fight for their future.

    A future where they learn, play, and explore without fear, no matter where they live.

    Where they can build the promise of long, flourishing lives.

    And where mothers can stand with clear eyes, shoulders at ease, trusting that their beloved children will come back to them safe.

    Mrs. Karis—Sirje—and Olena, I’m so grateful that you’ve brought us together to lay the foundation for that future.

    I know it will be stronger because of our partnerships.

    Olena, we continue to admire your selfless courage.

    Amid such suffering at home, it would have been enough for you to just speak out for the people of Ukraine.

    But you chose to look beyond your borders, calling on world leaders to see our shared challenges with new clarity and boldness.

    We’re here to offer our continued love and support to you.

    We stand with Ukraine today and for the future. 

    ###

    MIL OSI USA News –

    September 29, 2024
  • MIL-OSI United Nations: Committee on Enforced Disappearances Opens Twenty-Seventh Session

    Source: United Nations – Geneva

    Hears that Enforced Disappearances Are on the Increase as a Result of National and International Conflicts and Growing Polarisation Within and Between Countries

    The Committee on Enforced Disappearances this morning opened its twenty-seventh session, during which it will examine the reports of Morocco, Norway and Ukraine on their implementation of the provisions of the International Convention on the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance.

    Opening the session, Mahamane Cisse-Gouro, Director, Human Rights Council and Treaty Mechanisms Division, Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, and Representative of the Secretary-General, said the Committee’s agenda deserved the world’s full attention at a time when enforced disappearances were on the increase as a result of national and international conflicts, and growing polarisation within and between countries.  In times like these, the vital role of human rights mechanisms to protect and promote human rights became even more obvious.

    Mr. Cisse-Gouro welcomed that, since the last session, Thailand, South Africa, Côte d’Ivoire and Bangladesh became parties to the Convention, which now had 76 States parties.  He expressed hope that the World Congress on Enforced Disappearances, which would be held in Geneva, Switzerland on 15 and 16 January 2025, would contribute to efforts to achieve universal ratification.

    He also said he was pleased that, since the beginning of the Committee’s urgent action procedure, 512 urgent actions had been closed following the location of the disappeared person, including 15 since the last session.  Out of the 512 located persons, it was particularly heartening that 408 were located alive.

    Olivier de Frouville, Committee Chairperson, in his opening statement, said the session was opening in a context that was worrying for the future.  Conflicts of all kinds were multiplying and claiming thousands of victims on all continents.  In this context, the practice of enforced disappearances, far from receding, was spreading throughout the world.

    Mr. de Frouville said there could be no human rights without an effective rights protection system, but the treaty bodies system was dramatically under-resourced.  The Committee was therefore pleased by the adoption yesterday of the Pact for the Future by the General Assembly.  The Pact instructed the Secretary-General “to assess the need to provide the human rights protection mechanisms of the United Nations system, including the Office of the High Commissioner, with adequate, predictable, increased and sustainable funding to enable them to carry out their mandates efficiently and effectively.”

    Mr. de Frouville concluded by expressing solidarity with the victims of enforced disappearances, including the disappeared, their families and loved ones, who, day after day, suffered the torture of not knowing what had become of the victims.

    During the meeting, Shui-Meng Ng, the wife of Sombath Somphone, a victim of enforced disappearance in Lao People’s Democratic Republic, recounted her husband’s disappearance and her subsequent efforts seeking truth, justice and reparation. 

    Committee Expert Barbara Lochbihler provided the Committee’s response to Ms. Ng’s statement, thanking her for sharing her story and presenting actions undertaken and planned by the Committee concerning Mr. Somphone’s case and the broader fight against enforced disappearances.

    Before closing the meeting, the Committee adopted its agenda for the session.

    All the documents relating to the Committee’s work, including reports submitted by States parties, can be found on the session’s webpage.  Webcasts of the meetings of the session can be found here, and meetings summaries can be found here.

    The Committee will next meet in public at 3 p.m. this afternoon, Monday, 23 September, to consider the initial report of Ukraine (CED/C/UKR/1). 

    Statements

    MAHAMANE CISSE-GOURO, Director, Human Rights Council and Treaty Mechanisms Division, Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, and Representative of the Secretary-General, said the Committee’s agenda was as busy as ever and deserved the world’s full attention at a time when, sadly, enforced disappearances were on the increase as a result of national and international conflicts, and growing polarisation within and between countries. 

    There were multiple crises affecting the globe today.  In times like these, the vital role of human rights mechanisms to protect and promote human rights became even more obvious.  They communicated to States their human rights records and recommended ways to rectify what had gone wrong, bring justice to victims, and adopt measures to protect human rights and prevent their violation.  Mr. Cisse-Gouro said human rights were regulators and correctors of power dynamics gone awry. International cooperation, grounded in human rights, was the channel all had to effect change and to address the massive challenges of the time. 

    The work of the treaty bodies, including this Committee, was key to make this a reality.  The guidance and recommendations they provided, and the ongoing interaction they had with States, victims, civil society organizations, and national human rights institutions through the different mandated procedures, helped to identify ways to prevent and address human rights violations.

    In times like these, the human rights mechanisms benefitted from increased synergy and mutual reinforcement. Mr. Cisse-Gouro noted with pleasure that reference was made to the Committee’s general comment on enforced disappearances in the context of migration in the report of the Human Rights Council’s intersessional panel discussion on the human rights of migrants. This was an excellent example of mutual reinforcement.

    The Committee had continued to promote mutual reinforcement in all its activities.  Since the last session in February, it had responded positively to more than 15 requests for training and consultations submitted by States and civil society actors around the world to promote the ratification and implementation of the Convention. 

    On 30 August, the International Day of the Victims of Enforced Disappearances, the Committee issued a joint statement with the Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances, the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights, the Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights, and the representatives of Indonesia and Thailand to the Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations. In this statement, the Committee urged all actors to immediately join forces to support victims of enforced disappearances and ensure that their rights and obligations, as codified in regional and international treaties, became a reality for all.  The Committee called on actors to take part in the World Congress on Enforced Disappearances, which would be held in Geneva, Switzerland on 15 and 16 January 2025. 

    On the same occasion, the High Commissioner for Human Rights said that there was no justification for enforced disappearances.  Yet, every day, this heinous crime continued to silence and destroy lives.  The World Congress in January 2025 was an opportunity to establish a strategy and network so that the world could finally end this tool of terror.  Bringing together experts, victims, States and other key actors in the context of this first World Congress on Enforced Disappearances to share their experiences and good practices, and to establish a common strategy to promote the ratification of the Convention and its implementation, was indeed a unique opportunity that needed to be fully seized.

    In times like these, it was particularly welcome that, since the last session, Thailand, South Africa, Côte d’Ivoire and Bangladesh became parties to the Convention, which now had 76 States parties.  The Office celebrated these ratifications, while continuing its efforts to achieve universal ratification.  It hoped that the World Congress would contribute to reaching this objective. 

    The Office of the High Commissioner continued to actively support efforts to strengthen the treaty body system, which was the key topic at the thirty-sixth annual meeting of the treaty body Chairpersons in New York in June 2024.  The Chairpersons met with the Secretary-General and other senior United Nations officials, civil society and Member States.  The Chairs made marked progress in terms of aligning working methods, and they advocated together for enlarged support for the implementation of the treaty body strengthening process.  At a well-attended meeting with Member States, the Chairs called for resources to implement the predictable review schedule and other key strengthening proposals.

    A heavy programme for the next two weeks was before the Committee.  It would examine three States parties under the Convention: Ukraine, Morocco and Norway. It would also adopt lists of issues and lists of themes for Belgium, Lesotho, Seychelles and Serbia and consider requesting ad hoc additional information. 

    Also before the Committee was the report on urgent actions.  As of today, the Committee had registered a total of 1,893 urgent actions.  Out of these, 1,101 were “living cases” on which the Committee needed to carry out comprehensive follow-up, either individually or in groups.  Mr. Cisse-Gouro said he was particularly pleased that since the beginning of the procedure, 512 urgent actions had been closed following the location of the disappeared person, including 15 since the last session.  Out of the 512 located persons since the beginning of the implementation of the procedure, it was particularly heartening that 408 of them were located alive.  The Committee would also examine one individual complaint, and further discuss projects related to short-term enforced disappearances and to women and enforced disappearances. 

    Mr. Cisse-Gouro recalled the United Nations’ zero tolerance policy on intimidation and reprisals.  The Secretary-General had asked all entities to be vigilant and committed in this area. Civil society and victims provided crucial information and testimony to the treaty bodies and provided contextual information essential to their work.  States needed to ensure adequate protection against any act of intimidation or reprisal against those who cooperated or had cooperated with the United Nations and its mechanisms. 

    Mr. Cisse-Gouro concluded by expressing his support to the Committee and wished it a fruitful and productive session.

    OLIVIER DE FROUVILLE, Chairperson of the Committee on Enforced Disappearances, said the session opened in a context that was worrying for the future. Conflicts of all kinds were multiplying and claiming thousands of victims on all continents.  Power politics seemed to be back in international relations more than ever and, within States, merchants of hatred were stirring up mistrust between communities and preparing for tomorrow’s conflicts.  The disastrous consequences of global warming were increasingly being felt, causing natural disasters that were additional factors of instability.

    In this context, the practice of enforced disappearances, far from receding, was spreading throughout the world. Even when enforced disappearance took different forms, the objective always remained the same: to deny the disappeared person any humanity both as a legal person and as a natural person, and to spread terror among those close to them, who suffered the torture of uncertainty, a terror that quickly spread throughout society.  But victims were resilient, as were societies. 

    Experience showed that every time criminals wanted to impose silence and obedience through enforced disappearance, victims’ families assembled in public squares and brandished their photos, asking the simple and fundamental question: “where are they?” Above all, it was women, mothers, sisters, wives who had the courage to call out armed men, because no amount of oppression or extreme violence could make them accept that their loved ones had evaporated into thin air.  Their determination eventually gave rise to a new norm of international law: the complete prohibition of enforced disappearance.  Their struggle had also led to the adoption of the Convention, in which States pledged to take all measures to make this prohibition effective and to eliminate the practice of enforced disappearance.

    It was with a view to fulfilling this promise that several actors joined forces to organise the first World Congress on Enforced Disappearances, which would be held in Geneva on 15 and 16 January 2025.  Mr. de Frouville thanked the High Commissioner Völker Turk for agreeing to be present at the opening session of the Congress, as well as his Office and States that were co-sponsoring the event.  The Congress’ programme and plan of action were the result of a consultation process carried out since March 2024 with States and all other stakeholders, including victims’ associations, civil society organizations. and national human rights institutions.  Mr. de Frouville invited all States, including parties and non-parties to the Convention, and all stakeholders who were willing to commit themselves to acting, even modestly, against enforced disappearance to come to the meetings of the Congress.

    The fight for respect for human rights needed to be based on robust institutions and procedures.  There could be no human rights without an effective rights protection system.  However, the treaty bodies system was dramatically under-resourced; its budget was ridiculous in view of the magnitude of its task.  In 2023, its budget was 459 million United States dollars, of which only 178 million was financed from the United Nations regular budget, forcing the Office of the High Commissioner to find 280 million in extra-budgetary resources.  This sum did not cover all the estimated needs, which would have required an additional 171 million.  This amount seemed ludicrous in view of the major role that the United Nations system played today in defending human rights and helping States and civil society to defend them in a world where they were threatened more than ever.

    The Committee was therefore pleased by the adoption yesterday in New York of the Pact for the Future by the General Assembly.  Among other interesting provisions, Measure 46 of the Pact instructed the Secretary-General “to assess the need to provide the human rights protection mechanisms of the United Nations system, including the Office of the High Commissioner, with adequate, predictable, increased and sustainable funding to enable them to carry out their mandates efficiently and effectively.” 

    This was in line with the call made by the Chairpersons of the treaty bodies at their thirty-sixth meeting held last July in New York.  The Chairs told the Secretary-General and Member States that the treaty bodies needed, before the end of the year, a decisive resolution that would enable them to quickly implement the predictable timetable for the consideration of States’ reports.  The immediate costs associated with this change would in fact represent a saving in the medium and long term, since the change would be accompanied by a longer reporting period of eight years, and economies of scale resulting from better coordination and complementarity between the 10 Committees and the rest of the system.  The Committee Chairs expressed their hope that States would seize this opportunity to strengthen the treaty system decisively.

    A year ago, a conference was held on a joint declaration on illegal intercountry adoptions drafted by the Committee on Enforced Disappearances, the Committee on the Rights of the Child, and several Special Procedures.  The conference was an opportunity to hear from victims from all parts of the world, including adoptees and biological parents searching for their missing children. A documentary about the victims’ story and their quest for the truth would be premiered in Geneva, in parallel with this session, on 1 October 2024 in Auditorium A2 of the Maison de la Paix. The screening would be followed by a debate featuring the victims, who would testify about their experiences.  A short excerpt from the documentary would also be shown at the closing of this session on 4 October.

    Mr. de Frouville concluded by expressing solidarity with the victims of enforced disappearances, including the disappeared, their families and loved ones, who, day after day, suffered the torture of not knowing what had become of the victims.

    SHUI-MENG NG, wife of Sombath Somphone, victim of enforced disappearance in Lao People’s Democratic Republic, said her husband was disappeared in December 2012 in front of a police post, where he was pushed into a white vehicle and taken away.  Everything that happened at the time of the disappearance was recorded by police traffic cameras.  He was a community worker who helped poor farmers to improve their livelihoods.  He also worked with young people to find solutions for themselves and become more resilient, and with local communities to help them prepare and respond to climate change.  Ms. Ng said she did not know why he had been disappeared, but said his work may have annoyed powerful people, who felt he was threatening their interests.

    Ms. Ng did not know if her husband was still alive.  This was the pain that victims of enforced disappearance suffered.  The pain remained with her every day, despite the passing of time.  The fear that he would not come back loomed larger and larger with each day, and the hope that he would return was fading.

    Enforced disappearance was the most criminal violation of human rights.  Ms. Ng called on the Committee and all States to appeal to the Government of Lao People’s Democratic Republic to reveal the truth regarding this enforced disappearance.  Ms. Ng had appealed to the authorities and received no information, with authorities simply stating that the investigation was ongoing.  The hope that she would receive truth and justice was becoming more remote, but she said that she would not give up.  She would continue to raise the case of her husband at every opportunity, seeking news about what happened to him, as well as truth, justice and reparation until her last breath.

    Ms. Ng urged the Committee to not forget the victims and their families.  There were more than 14,000 cases of enforced disappearance before the United Nations.  This was unacceptable in a world where governments claimed to protect their citizens from enforced disappearance.  The Lao People’s Democratic Republic was a signatory to the Convention but had not ratified it.  It nevertheless needed to uphold the spirit of the Convention.  In closing, Ms. Ng appealed for the safe return of her husband.

    BARBARA LOCHBIHLER, Committee Expert, thanked Ms. Ng for sharing the day that changed her life, the struggle that had defined her life ever since, and the pain that remained with her every day.  This case was particular in several respects.  Sombath Somphone was a well-known, dedicated and passionate community worker.  He was honoured with awards beyond his country.  His disappearance did not happen mysteriously in an unknown place but was recorded by police traffic cameras. 

    International non-governmental organizations like Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch had campaigned on his behalf, and international media had reported on the case.  The European Parliament had called for his release, as had parliamentarians from the region.  United Nations bodies, including the Human Rights Committee, had questioned the Lao Government on the issue.  Ms. Ng’s tireless efforts were based on her professional expertise, her profound knowledge of international structures, and her experience in international solidarity networking.  Despite these efforts, Sombath Somphone remained disappeared, his fate and whereabouts still unknown to his family and friends.

    Pain and suffering remained with the victims of enforced disappearance every day despite the passing of time, because with time hope faded.  Ms. Ng and Mr. Somphone’s supporters had been confronted with ignorance, disregard, inaction, negligence and outright lies from authorities.  This was what so many victims of enforced disappearance had to deal with, often exacerbated by reprisals and existential distress.  Mr. Somphone’s case clearly showed that an enforced disappearance had not only serious consequences for victims’ family and friends but also had a chilling effect on the civil society of the given community or country.  After Mr. Somphone’s disappearance, civil society organizations in Lao People’s Democratic Republic were in fear, becoming more careful in their work or even inactive.  This surely pleased those responsible for Mr. Somphone’s disappearance.

    Ms. Ng, as with victims in so many countries, rightly had high expectations of the Committee.  However, the Government of Lao People’s Democratic Republic had signed but not ratified the Convention, so the Committee had no formal means to review the situation in the State or ask for information on particular cases.  Unfortunately, this applied to many countries in Asia, where only a few States had ratified the Convention. 

    The Committee was sincerely committed to change this, intensifying its outreach to governments and the broader human rights movement.  Last year, it had a fruitful meeting with the Association of Southeast Asian Nations’ Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights. In November, the regional office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights and the Committee would organise several workshops with State and civil society organization representatives in Bangkok, and in January, the World Congress on Enforced Disappearance would gather activists and diplomats, victims and United Nations representatives to discuss ways forward in the fight against enforced disappearances.

    Regrettably, the impact of a United Nations treaty body had its limitations.  Essential for things to change was serious political will by the Government to act.  The Committee would appeal to the Lao Government to demonstrate this political will and would never forget the victims.  Ms. Lochbihler thanked Ms. Ng wholeheartedly for addressing the Committee, congratulating her for her passion and energy, and for not being discouraged by years of ignorance and denial.  She expressed hope that the search for Ms. Ng’s husband would one day bring to light what really happened, as Ms. Ng had the right to know the truth.

     

    Produced by the United Nations Information Service in Geneva for use of the media; 
    not an official record. English and French versions of our releases are different as they are the product of two separate coverage teams that work independently.

     

     

     

    CED24.006E

    MIL OSI United Nations News –

    September 29, 2024
  • MIL-OSI China: Summit of the Future reaches consensus on UN updates to address challenges

    Source: China State Council Information Office 3

    Philemon Yang, president of the General Assembly of the United Nations, speaks at the Summit of the Future at the UN headquarters in New York, Sept. 22, 2024. [Photo/Xinhua]

    The Summit of the Future opened at the United Nations (UN) headquarters in New York on Sunday, with the adoption of a Pact for the Future, as well as its annexes the Global Digital Compact and the Declaration on Future Generations, which cover a broad range of themes including peace and security, sustainable development, climate change, digital cooperation, human rights, gender, youth and future generations and the transformation of global governance.

    The Pact for the Future is the UN’s master plan for tackling challenges that lie ahead for humanity, with 56 “actions” covering everything from peacekeeping to the potential threats posed by artificial intelligence. The pact underlines the “increasingly complex challenges” to world peace, notably the threat of nuclear war, with the document reiterating the UN’s core tenets.

    The pact promises to accelerate efforts to attain the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), which aim for the eradication of extreme poverty by 2030, an intensified battle against hunger, promotion of gender equality and education. Most of the objectives were set in 2005, but are far from being realized. Against that backdrop, and with poor countries particularly mobilized for change, the pact especially calls for “reform of the international financial architecture.”

    What UNGA president says?

    “We stand at a crossroads of global transformation, facing unprecedented challenges that demand urgent, collective action,” Philemon Yang, president the UN General Assembly, said at the opening segment of the two-day summit. “From conflict and climate change to the digital divide, from inequalities to threats against human rights, together, we all face profound challenges. Yet, alongside these challenges, there is hope,” because challenges come along with opportunities.

    The Pact for the Future represents the world body’s pledge not only to address immediate crises, but lay the foundations for a sustainable, just, and peaceful global order, for all peoples and nations, he said, adding that the commitments embodied in the pact and its annexes reflect the collective will of UN member states to promote international peace and security, invigorate implementation of the SDGs, foster just and inclusive societies, and ensure that technologies always serve the common good of humankind.

    “The Summit of the Future is a call to action. We must shape our future to protect ourselves and our planet Earth,” said the president. “Action that recommits us to the principles of international law, the goals of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the promise of the United Nations Charter to save future generations from the pain of war.”

    The world body’s mission is to eradicate poverty in all its forms, tackle inequalities, and promote peace and security, tolerance and respect for diversity, and the summit offers a historic opportunity to ensure that progress is shared equitably across all nations and communities everywhere, he said.

    “We have an obligation to harness the power of science, technology, and innovation, in order to prepare the future of humankind. It is also important that we reproduce our human successes across generations all the time,” noted the president. “Let us continue our efforts to reform and strengthen global institutions that support peace, security, sustainable development, and financial stability.”

    What UN secretary general says?

    “I called for this summit to consider deep reforms to make global institutions more legitimate, fair and effective, based on the values of the UN Charter,” said UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres at the meeting. “I called for this summit because 21st century challenges require 21st century solutions: frameworks that are networked and inclusive; and that draw on the expertise of all of humanity … our world is heading off the rails — and we need tough decisions to get back on track.”

    Conflicts are raging and multiplying, from the Middle East to Ukraine and Sudan, with no end in sight, he said, adding that the world’s collective security system is threatened by geopolitical divides, nuclear posturing, and the development of new weapons and theaters of war, while resources that could bring opportunities and hope are invested in death and destruction.

    “In short, our multilateral tools and institutions are unable to respond effectively to today’s political, economic, environmental and technological challenges. And tomorrow’s will be even more difficult and even more dangerous,” noted the secretary general, stressing that things are changing fast but the world’s peace and security tools and institutions, as well as its global financial architecture, reflect a bygone era.

    Technology, geopolitics and globalization have transformed power relations and the world is going through a time of turbulence and a period of transition, he addressed the meeting. With the adoption of the Pact for the Future, the Global Digital Compact and the Declaration on Future Generations, pathways are opened to new possibilities and opportunities — a breakthrough on peace and security reforms to make the Security Council more reflective of today’s world is promised.

    These three landmark agreements are a step-change toward more effective, inclusive, networked multilateralism, said Guterres, noting that their implementation will prioritize dialogue and negotiation, end the wars tearing the world apart, and reform the composition and working methods of the Security Council. “To rebuild trust, we must start with the present and look to the future. People everywhere are hoping for a future of peace, dignity, and prosperity.”

    What Summit of the Future Means?

    In 2020, the United Nations turned 75 and marked the occasion by starting a global conversation about hopes and fears for the future. This was the beginning of a process that would eventually lead, four years later, to the convening of the Summit of the Future, a major event this September, just before the annual high-level debate of the General Assembly.

    The summit was conceived at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, when there was a perception at the UN that countries and people pulled apart instead of cooperating to face this global threat.

    “We were really confronted with the gap between the aspirations of our founders, which we were trying to celebrate at the 75th anniversary, and the reality of the world as it is today,” said Michele Griffin, the policy director of the summit.

    UN member states tasked Guterres to come up with a vision for the future of global cooperation. His answer to their call was “Our Common Agenda,” a landmark report with recommendations on renewed global cooperation to address a host of risks and threats, and a proposal to hold a forward-looking summit in 2024.

    The event consists of sessions and plenaries based around five main tracks — sustainable development and financing; peace and security; a digital future for all; youth and future generations; and global governance — and other topics that cut across all of the work of the UN, including human rights, gender equality and the climate crisis.

    The immediate outcome is the finalized version of the Pact for the Future, with the Global Digital Compact and the Declaration for Future Generations as annexes, all of which were adopted by member states during the summit on Sunday.

    MIL OSI China News –

    September 29, 2024
  • MIL-OSI: Organizations are ramping up efforts to meet sustainability targets, despite geopolitical challenges

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Press contact:
    Victoire Grux 
    Tel.: +33 6 04 52 16 55 
    Email: victoire.grux@capgemini.com 

    Organizations are ramping up efforts to meet sustainability targets, despite geopolitical challenges

    • 69% of executives say that anticipating stricter future regulations is a key driver of sustainability initiatives, up from 57% last year
    • Nearly two thirds say geopolitics is driving a slowdown in their sustainability investments
    • Six out of ten are concerned that their organization’s sustainability efforts might appear insincere to the public, up from only 11% in 2023.

    Paris, September 23, 2024 – Organizations continue to make progress in their sustainability initiatives, despite facing geopolitical challenges. Regulation and technology are proving to be a vital part of this progress, with two thirds of executives agreeing that their organization will never be able to achieve its sustainability goals without climate tech. This is according to the Capgemini Research Institute’s latest report, ‘A world in balance 2024: Accelerating sustainability amidst geopolitical challenges’, which tracks advancements in organizations’ environmental and social sustainability over the last three years. The third edition of the report highlights marked improvements in circularity, sustainable design, measurement, water stewardship, biodiversity, and sustainability skilling, despite shortfalls in tackling Scope 3 emissions and consumer skepticism.

    Collectively, organizations are ramping up their efforts to meet their sustainability targets, and their maturity in adopting sustainable practices has increased steadily since 2022. 84% of executives this year say their organization is on target to meet its carbon emissions goals; less than a tenth say they are behind. As organizations look to minimize their impact on the environment, progress is particularly visible in terms of circularity, sustainable product design, measurement, and water management. For instance, nearly three quarters of executives say that recycling products is a core aspect of their manufacturing strategy, up from 53% in 2022, while over two thirds said they were redesigning products to remove fossil fuel feedstock sources, up from less than half in 2022. In addition, three-quarters of executives have implemented a water-stewardship program, up from 55% in 2022.

    In late 2023, executives were planning to increase investments in sustainability this year. However, companies have not followed through: average annual investment in sustainability initiatives and practices now stands at 0.82% of total revenue, down from 0.92% in 2023.

    “This year’s report shows sustainability projects continuing to build momentum in 2024 despite current headwinds,” said Cyril Garcia, Capgemini’s Head of Global Sustainability Services and Corporate Responsibility and Group Executive Board Member. “Business leaders have the power and the responsibility to steer us towards a more sustainable economy. Water stewardship, biodiversity preservation, and circular practices are now established as key business imperatives. Executives are being very pragmatic, and CO2reduction must now be translated into cost savings. We continue to see sustainability efforts bolstered by new climate tech innovations and regulations. The best way to build trust and credibility with consumers is by demonstrating tangible outcomes and planning for a future with sustainability at its heart.”

    Consumers unconvinced about progress
    Consumers want to see corporations going even further and demand transparency. The report finds three-quarters of consumers expecting corporations to play a larger role in reducing GHG emissions in 2024. Furthermore, even as organizations ramp up sustainability initiatives, consumers are more skeptical than ever about corporate sustainability, as more than half believe that organizations are greenwashing their sustainability initiatives, up from 33% in 2023.

    Geopolitics and regulations impacting corporate sustainability initiatives
    Executives pointed to climate-related regulations as a key driver of sustainability projects. A full three-quarters of executives believe that sustainability regulation is necessary to achieve global climate goals, and nearly two thirds even agree that without regulation, their organization would not have launched many environmental sustainability initiatives.

    Globally, 73% of executives agree that the EU’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) is honing sustainability measurement and tracking capabilities. However, organizations continue to fall short in terms of reporting on sustainability initiatives, especially on Scope 3 emissions. Among organizations required to report for CSRD in 2025, just over a third say that they are prepared to report Scope 3 downstream emissions next year, while 86% are prepared for Scope 1.

    Meanwhile, tensions such as US-China relations, the wars in Ukraine and the Middle East, and the European energy crisis, are leading to disruption to supply chains and business operations, and uncertainty around government funding. This year, nearly two thirds of executives pointed to geopolitics as an increasing consideration in sustainability investments, and 69% are concerned about the impact of the uncertain US political scene. This is felt across countries, but Swedish executives are most concerned (75%), compared with 71% of US executives and 59% of executives in India.

    To access the full report: https://www.capgemini.com/insights/research-library/sustainability-trends-2024

    Methodology
    The Capgemini Research Institute surveyed 2,152 executives employed at 727 organizations, each with more than $1 billion in annual revenue, across 13 countries in North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific and in 12 industries and sectors, in June and July 2024. Executives surveyed were director level and above and 50% were from corporate functions, such as strategy, sustainability, sales, and marketing; 50% were from value chain functions, such as product design, R&D, procurement, and logistics. The Institute also surveyed 6,500 consumers over the age of 18 across the 13 countries and conducted interviews with 12 senior sustainability executives at leading organizations globally.

    About Capgemini
    Capgemini is a global business and technology transformation partner, helping organizations to accelerate their dual transition to a digital and sustainable world, while creating tangible impact for enterprises and society. It is a responsible and diverse group of 340,000 team members in more than 50 countries. With its strong over 55-year heritage, Capgemini is trusted by its clients to unlock the value of technology to address the entire breadth of their business needs. It delivers end-to-end services and solutions leveraging strengths from strategy and design to engineering, all fuelled by its market leading capabilities in AI, cloud and data, combined with its deep industry expertise and partner ecosystem. The Group reported 2023 global revenues of €22.5 billion.

    Get the Future You Want | www.capgemini.com

    About the Capgemini Research Institute
    The Capgemini Research Institute is Capgemini’s in-house think-tank on all things digital. The Institute publishes research on the impact of digital technologies on large traditional businesses. The team draws on the worldwide network of Capgemini experts and works closely with academic and technology partners. The Institute has dedicated research centers in India, Singapore, the United Kingdom and the United States. It was recently ranked #1 in the world for the quality of its research by independent analysts. 

    Visit us at https://www.capgemini.com/researchinstitute/ 

    Attachment

    • 09_23 Capgemini Sustainability business trends CRI report

    The MIL Network –

    September 29, 2024
  • MIL-OSI Video: Gaza, Lebanon, Summit of the Future & other topics – Daily Briefing (20 Sep 2024) | United Nations

    Source: United Nations (Video News)

    Noon Briefing by Stéphane Dujarric, Spokesperson for the Secretary-General.

    Highlights:
    – Summit of the Future Action Days
    – Lebanon
    – Occupied Palestinian Territory
    – Syria
    – Venezuela
    – Ukraine
    – Democratic Republic of the Congo
    – Somalia
    – Viet Nam
    – Haiti
    – International Day of Peace
    – World Cleanup Day

    Summit of the Future Action Days
    This afternoon, at 1pm, the Summit of the Future Action days will kick off with a youth-led event.
    Felipe Paullier, the Assistant Secretary-General for Youth Affairs, will lead the opening ceremony under the theme #Youthlead the future.
    At 2pm, the Secretary-General will take part in a dialogue with youth advocates. This will also take place in the General Assembly Hall and you will be able to watch the conversation live on UN Webtv.
    The action days, which are convened by the Secretary-General, will continue tomorrow. The Secretary-General will address Saturday’s opening session at 9 a.m, tomorrow.
    Tomorrow’s programme will focus on three priority themes – digital and technology, peace and security, and sustainable development and financing.
    There will also be a dedicated focus throughout the day on future generations.
    The action days bring together representatives from Member States, civil society, the private sector, academia, youth, and more. The full list of events and side events is available on the webpage of the Summit of the Future.

    Lebanon
    We are very concerned at the heightened escalation across the Blue Line, including the deadly strike we saw on Beirut today. We urge all parties to de-escalate immediately. All must exercise maximum restraint.
    We also urge the parties to immediately return to the cessation of hostilities and to fully implement Security Council resolution 1701.
    The region is on the brink of a catastrophe. All efforts should focus on finding a diplomatic solution.
    Our Special Coordinator for Lebanon, Jeannine Hennis-Plasschaert, has been insistently conveying these messages to her interlocutors in Lebanon and Israel.
    And this afternoon, the Under-Secretary-General for Political Affairs, Rosemary DiCarlo, and our High Commissioner for Human Rights, Volker Türk, will brief the Security Council in an open meeting on developments in Lebanon. They will convey similar messages. Those remarks will be shared with you.
    Meanwhile, on the peacekeeping front, our blue helmets at UNIFIL peacekeepers continue to implement their mandate in, obviously, extremely challenging conditions, working to help avert further escalation and return to a cessation of hostilities.
    The head of the UN peacekeeping mission there, Force Commander General Aroldo Lázaro, has been in constant communication with the Lebanese Armed Forces and the Israel Defense Forces to help avoid any miscalculations along the Blue Line and to support humanitarian access in southern Lebanon.

    Occupied Palestinian Territory
    Turning to the situation in Gaza, the Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs says that Palestinians already displaced in the Strip are at risk of having to move again as the rainy season approaches, which is expected to bring flooding and high tides.
    OCHA says that many of those displaced by hostilities in Gaza are sheltering along the Mediterranean coast, where Israeli-issued evacuation orders have instructed them to go. Several municipalities in Gaza have also warned of the risks, with some advising people sheltering in low-lying areas to leave and seek out safer places due to the danger of flooding. Displaced people in Khan Younis and Deir al Balah have been warned to move to higher ground and stay away from the shore, as high tides could cause their tents to drift, among other risks.
    UNRWA, for its part, warns that people in Gaza are sheltering in open spaces with no sewage network or rainwater drainage systems. The agency says that as reptiles, rodents and insects spread, its teams are spraying pesticides and removing waste to protect families from diseases.
    Meanwhile, OCHA also reports that water, sanitation and hygiene operations in northern Gaza have been forced to drastically reduce their operating hours to prevent shutdowns.
    Our partners working on the response say it continues to be extremely difficult to get fuel to the north, with deliveries often delayed or rejected at checkpoints.
    In addition to fuel shortages and the ongoing electricity outages that stall pumps, the current water crisis in Gaza has been worsened by damage to water infrastructure, the absence of safety to make repairs, and a lack of spare parts and chlorine.
    To address the critical lack of clean water in Gaza, UNICEF says it is providing 15 litres of water per person per day for nearly 900,000 people, ensuring that part of their water needs are met for a duration of three months.

    Full Highlights: https://www.un.org/sg/en/content/ossg/noon-briefing-highlight?date%5Bvalue%5D%5Bdate%5D=20%20September%202024

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wyNKmTDNQTk

    MIL OSI Video –

    September 29, 2024
  • MIL-OSI Video: International Day of Peace 2024 – UN Chief Message | United Nations

    Source: United Nations (Video News)

    Video message by António Guterres, Secretary-General of the United Nations, on the International Day of Peace (21 September 2024).

    “Everywhere we look, peace is under attack.
    From Gaza, to Sudan, to Ukraine and beyond we see:
    Civilians in the firing line;
    Homes blown apart;
    Traumatised, terrified populations who have lost everything – and sometimes everyone.
    This catalogue of human misery must stop.
    Our world needs peace.
    Peace is the ultimate prize for all humanity.
    And as this International Day of Peace reminds us – the solutions are in our hands.
    Cultivating a culture of peace means replacing division, disempowerment, and despair with justice, equality and hope for all.
    It means focusing on preventing conflict;
    Propelling the Sustainable Development Goals;
    Promoting human rights.
    And tackling all forms of discrimination and hate.
    This month’s Summit of the Future is a vital opportunity to advance these aims.
    Let’s seize it.
    Together, let’s lay the groundwork for peace.
    And let’s nurture a culture where equality, peace and justice thrive.
    Thank you”.

    Website: https://www.un.org/en/observances/international-day-peace

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ej9gtJBfQoo

    MIL OSI Video –

    September 29, 2024
  • MIL-OSI Video: Gaza, Lebanon, Summit of the Future & other topics – Daily Briefing (20 Sep 2024) | United Nations

    Source: United Nations (Video News)

    Noon Briefing by Stéphane Dujarric, Spokesperson for the Secretary-General.

    Highlights:
    – Summit of the Future Action Days
    – Lebanon
    – Occupied Palestinian Territory
    – Syria
    – Venezuela
    – Ukraine
    – Democratic Republic of the Congo
    – Somalia
    – Viet Nam
    – Haiti
    – International Day of Peace
    – World Cleanup Day

    Summit of the Future Action Days
    This afternoon, at 1pm, the Summit of the Future Action days will kick off with a youth-led event.
    Felipe Paullier, the Assistant Secretary-General for Youth Affairs, will lead the opening ceremony under the theme #Youthlead the future.
    At 2pm, the Secretary-General will take part in a dialogue with youth advocates. This will also take place in the General Assembly Hall and you will be able to watch the conversation live on UN Webtv.
    The action days, which are convened by the Secretary-General, will continue tomorrow. The Secretary-General will address Saturday’s opening session at 9 a.m, tomorrow.
    Tomorrow’s programme will focus on three priority themes – digital and technology, peace and security, and sustainable development and financing.
    There will also be a dedicated focus throughout the day on future generations.
    The action days bring together representatives from Member States, civil society, the private sector, academia, youth, and more. The full list of events and side events is available on the webpage of the Summit of the Future.

    Lebanon
    We are very concerned at the heightened escalation across the Blue Line, including the deadly strike we saw on Beirut today. We urge all parties to de-escalate immediately. All must exercise maximum restraint.
    We also urge the parties to immediately return to the cessation of hostilities and to fully implement Security Council resolution 1701.
    The region is on the brink of a catastrophe. All efforts should focus on finding a diplomatic solution.
    Our Special Coordinator for Lebanon, Jeannine Hennis-Plasschaert, has been insistently conveying these messages to her interlocutors in Lebanon and Israel.
    And this afternoon, the Under-Secretary-General for Political Affairs, Rosemary DiCarlo, and our High Commissioner for Human Rights, Volker Türk, will brief the Security Council in an open meeting on developments in Lebanon. They will convey similar messages. Those remarks will be shared with you.
    Meanwhile, on the peacekeeping front, our blue helmets at UNIFIL peacekeepers continue to implement their mandate in, obviously, extremely challenging conditions, working to help avert further escalation and return to a cessation of hostilities.
    The head of the UN peacekeeping mission there, Force Commander General Aroldo Lázaro, has been in constant communication with the Lebanese Armed Forces and the Israel Defense Forces to help avoid any miscalculations along the Blue Line and to support humanitarian access in southern Lebanon.

    Occupied Palestinian Territory
    Turning to the situation in Gaza, the Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs says that Palestinians already displaced in the Strip are at risk of having to move again as the rainy season approaches, which is expected to bring flooding and high tides.
    OCHA says that many of those displaced by hostilities in Gaza are sheltering along the Mediterranean coast, where Israeli-issued evacuation orders have instructed them to go. Several municipalities in Gaza have also warned of the risks, with some advising people sheltering in low-lying areas to leave and seek out safer places due to the danger of flooding. Displaced people in Khan Younis and Deir al Balah have been warned to move to higher ground and stay away from the shore, as high tides could cause their tents to drift, among other risks.
    UNRWA, for its part, warns that people in Gaza are sheltering in open spaces with no sewage network or rainwater drainage systems. The agency says that as reptiles, rodents and insects spread, its teams are spraying pesticides and removing waste to protect families from diseases.
    Meanwhile, OCHA also reports that water, sanitation and hygiene operations in northern Gaza have been forced to drastically reduce their operating hours to prevent shutdowns.
    Our partners working on the response say it continues to be extremely difficult to get fuel to the north, with deliveries often delayed or rejected at checkpoints.
    In addition to fuel shortages and the ongoing electricity outages that stall pumps, the current water crisis in Gaza has been worsened by damage to water infrastructure, the absence of safety to make repairs, and a lack of spare parts and chlorine.
    To address the critical lack of clean water in Gaza, UNICEF says it is providing 15 litres of water per person per day for nearly 900,000 people, ensuring that part of their water needs are met for a duration of three months.

    Full Highlights: https://www.un.org/sg/en/content/ossg/noon-briefing-highlight?date%5Bvalue%5D%5Bdate%5D=20%20September%202024

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wyNKmTDNQTk

    MIL OSI Video –

    September 29, 2024
  • MIL-OSI: Outbrain announces repurchase of remaining 2.95% Convertible Senior Notes due 2026

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    NEW YORK, Sept. 23, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Outbrain Inc. (NASDAQ: OB), a leading technology platform that drives business results by engaging people across the Open Internet, announced today that it has repurchased all of the remaining $118 million in aggregate principal amount of the 2.95% Convertible Senior Notes due 2026 (the “Convertible Notes”) via a privately negotiated repurchase agreement with Baupost Group Securities, L.L.C., the sole holder of the Convertible Notes. The Company paid, including accrued interest, $109.7 million in cash representing a discount to par value of approximately 7.5%. As a result, Outbrain will record a pre-tax gain of approximately $8.8 million in the third quarter of 2024.

    Following the closing of the transaction, Outbrain has repurchased the entire principal balance of $236 million of the Convertible Notes, with no remaining debt on the balance sheet and approximately $128 million of cash, cash equivalents and investments in marketable securities, when adjusting the balance as of August 31, 2024 for the repayment. Outbrain repurchased the initial $118 million principal amount of the Convertible Notes in April 2023.

    “Our ability to generate cash and our strong balance sheet has enabled the opportunistic repurchase of the remaining balance of Convertible Notes, which is also in anticipation of the expected closing of the Teads acquisition. We believe this transaction strengthens our balance sheet, increasing our net cash balance as we maintain ample liquidity to support our future growth,” said Jason Kiviat, Outbrain’s CFO.

    This press release does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation to buy any of the Convertible Notes described herein or any securities of the Company, nor shall there be any offer, solicitation, or sale of the Convertible Notes or any securities of the Company in any jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful.

    Forward-Looking Statements

    This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws, which statements involve substantial risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements may include, without limitation, statements generally relating to possible or assumed future results of our business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, plans and objectives and statements relating to the transaction to acquire Teads (“Transaction”). You can generally identify forward-looking statements because they contain words such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “could,” “intends,” “guidance,” “outlook,” “target,” “projects,” “contemplates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “foresee,” “potential” or “continue” or the negative of these terms or other similar expressions that concern our expectations, strategy, plans or intentions or are not statements of historical fact. We have based these forward-looking statements largely on our expectations and projections regarding future events and trends that we believe may affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations. The outcome of the events described in these forward-looking statements is subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors including, but not limited to: overall advertising demand and traffic generated by our media partners; factors that affect advertising demand and spending, such as the continuation or worsening of unfavorable economic or business conditions or downturns, instability or volatility in financial markets, and other events or factors outside of our control, such as U.S. and global recession concerns, geopolitical concerns, including the ongoing war between Ukraine-Russia and conditions in Israel, supply chain issues, inflationary pressures, labor market volatility, bank closures or disruptions, and the impact of challenging economic conditions, political and policy uncertainties with the approach of the U.S. presidential election, and other factors that have and may further impact advertisers’ ability to pay; our ability to continue to innovate, and adoption by our advertisers and media partners of our expanding solutions; the success of our sales and marketing investments, which may require significant investments and may involve long sales cycles; our ability to grow our business and manage growth effectively; our ability to compete effectively against current and future competitors; the loss or decline of one or more of our large media partners, and our ability to expand our advertiser and media partner relationships; conditions in Israel, including the ongoing war between Israel and Hamas and other terrorist organizations, may limit our ability to market, support and innovate on our products due to the impact on our employees as well as our advertisers and their advertising markets, our ability to maintain our revenues or profitability despite quarterly fluctuations in our results, whether due to seasonality, large cyclical events, or other causes; the risk that our research and development efforts may not meet the demands of a rapidly evolving technology market; any failure of our recommendation engine to accurately predict attention or engagement, any deterioration in the quality of our recommendations or failure to present interesting content to users or other factors which may cause us to experience a decline in user engagement or loss of media partners; limits on our ability to collect, use and disclose data to deliver advertisements; our ability to extend our reach into evolving digital media platforms; our ability to maintain and scale our technology platform; our ability to meet demands on our infrastructure and resources due to future growth or otherwise; our failure or the failure of third parties to protect our sites, networks and systems against security breaches, or otherwise to protect the confidential information of us or our partners; outages or disruptions that impact us or our service providers, resulting from cyber incidents, or failures or loss of our infrastructure; significant fluctuations in currency exchange rates; political and regulatory risks in the various markets in which we operate; the challenges of compliance with differing and changing regulatory requirements; the timing and execution of any cost-saving measures and the impact on our business or strategy; our ability and the time required to consummate the Transaction; our ability to successfully integrate Teads’s operations, technologies and employees and to recognize the anticipated benefits and synergies of the Transaction, including the expectation of enhancements to our services, greater revenue or growth opportunities, operating efficiencies and cost savings; the potential impact of the announcement or pendency of the Transaction on ongoing business operations and relationships, including our ability to maintain relationships with employees, customers, suppliers and others with whom we do business; the amount of costs, fees, expenses and charges relating to the Transaction; the initiation or outcome of any legal proceedings that may be instituted following the announcement of the Transaction; and the risks described in the section entitled “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed for the year ended December 31, 2023 and in subsequent reports filed with the SEC. Accordingly, you should not rely upon forward-looking statements as an indication of future performance. We cannot assure you that the results, events and circumstances reflected in the forward-looking statements will be achieved or will occur, and actual results, events, or circumstances could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements made in this press release relate only to events as of the date on which the statements are made. We may not actually achieve the plans, intentions or expectations disclosed in our forward-looking statements and you should not place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation and do not assume any obligation to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or circumstances after the date on which the statements are made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events or otherwise, except as required by law.

    About Outbrain

    Outbrain (Nasdaq: OB) is a leading technology platform that drives business results by engaging people across the Open Internet. Outbrain predicts moments of engagement to drive measurable outcomes for advertisers and publishers using AI and machine learning across more than 8,000 online properties globally. Founded in 2006, Outbrain is headquartered in New York with offices in Israel and across the United States, Europe, Asia-Pacific, and South America.

    For more information, visit https://www.outbrain.com.

    Media Contact

    press@outbrain.com

    Investor Relations Contact

    IR@outbrain.com

    (332) 205-8999

    The MIL Network –

    September 29, 2024
  • MIL-OSI Canada: Minister Joly and Parliamentary Secretary Oliphant to attend UN General Assembly High-Level Week

    Source: Government of Canada News (2)

    The Honourable Mélanie Joly, Minister of Foreign Affairs, today announced that she will join Prime Minister Justin Trudeau as part of Canada’s delegation to the 79th session of the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) High-Level Week in New York City, New York. Rob Oliphant, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Foreign Affairs, will also travel to New York as part of Canada’s delegation.

    September 23, 2024 – Ottawa, Ontario – Global Affairs Canada

    The Honourable Mélanie Joly, Minister of Foreign Affairs, today announced that she will join Prime Minister Justin Trudeau as part of Canada’s delegation to the 79th session of the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) High-Level Week in New York City, New York. Rob Oliphant, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Foreign Affairs, will also travel to New York as part of Canada’s delegation.

    During the UNGA High-Level Week, Minister Joly will co-host a high-level panel discussion on the subject of media freedom and present the 2024 Canada-United Kingdom Media Freedom Award with Lord Collins of Highbury, the United Kingdom’s Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State of the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office. This event reflects Canada’s enduring commitment to support free and independent journalism.

    Minister Joly will also participate in a leader-level meeting of the UN Ad Hoc Advisory Group on Haiti, co-hosted by Prime Minister Trudeau and Garry Conille, Prime Minister of Haiti, which will focus on the urgent need for Haitian-led solutions in response to the ongoing crisis there. This event will also offer a unique opportunity to mobilize the international community’s support for the Haitian government’s priorities for the transition.

    The Minister will also co-host a high-level event with representatives of Ukraine and Estonia that will underscore the urgent need to restore the rights of children worldwide and enhance child protection, including addressing the unlawful deportation and forced transfer of Ukrainian children to Russia. She will highlight Canada’s ongoing efforts to support the repatriation of Ukrainian children and Canada’s unwavering support for Ukraine’s sovereignty in the face of Russian aggression.

    Minister Joly will deliver Canada’s national statement to the United Nations General Assembly, where she will emphasize Canada’s continued commitment to promoting multilateral cooperation, human rights, democracy and the rule of law.

    While in New York City, Minister Joly will attend a series of events that will focus on advancing gender equality and fostering the equal and meaningful participation of women in decision-making processes, including an event on the margins of the UNGA High-Level Week that will be attended by women leaders from around the world. The Minister will also participate in an event on securing reproductive choice for women and girls.

    Minister Joly will also meet with numerous partners and allies, including G7 foreign ministers and other senior officials from around the world. Their exchanges will focus on pressing global issues, including the situation in Gaza and the broader Middle East region and Russia’s continuing aggression against Ukraine. Minister Joly will also emphasize the continued importance of strengthening the rules-based international order and protecting human rights and gender equality.

    While in New York City, Parliamentary Secretary Oliphant will attend a discussion focused on promoting the rights of women and girls during the Summit of the Future Action Days and will participate in a Commonwealth Ministerial Action Group meeting to discuss key issues related to democracy and human rights in the Commonwealth, including in Bangladesh and Gabon. His discussions during the meeting will help to advance the agenda for the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting that will take place in Samoa in October 2024.

    MIL OSI Canada News –

    September 29, 2024
  • MIL-OSI Translation: Minister Joly and Parliamentary Secretary Oliphant to Participate in United Nations General Assembly High-Level Week

    MIL OSI Translation. Canadian French to English –

    Source: Government of Canada – in French

    The Honourable Mélanie Joly, Minister of Foreign Affairs, today announced that she will be part of the Canadian delegation, alongside Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, to the 79th session of the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) High-Level Week in New York. Rob Oliphant, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Foreign Affairs, will also travel to New York as part of the Canadian delegation.

    September 23, 2024 – Ottawa, Ontario – Global Affairs Canada

    The Honourable Mélanie Joly, Minister of Foreign Affairs, today announced that she will join Prime Minister Justin Trudeau as part of the Canadian delegation to the 79th session of the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) High-Level Week in New York. Rob Oliphant, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Foreign Affairs, will also travel to New York as part of the Canadian delegation.

    During the 79th session of the General Assembly, Minister Joly will co-chair a high-level panel discussion on press freedom and present the 2024 Canada–United Kingdom Press Freedom Award, along with the United Kingdom’s Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs, Lord Collins of Highbury. This event demonstrates Canada’s enduring commitment to supporting free and independent journalism.

    Minister Joly will also participate in a meeting of the leaders of the United Nations Ad Hoc Advisory Group on Haiti, co-chaired by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and the Prime Minister of Haiti, Garry Conille. The meeting will focus on the urgent need for solutions that are being put forward by the Haitian people in response to the current crisis in the country. This event will also provide a unique opportunity to mobilize international support for the Haitian government’s priorities for the transition.

    The Minister will also co-host another high-level event with representatives from Ukraine and Estonia, which will highlight the urgent need to restore children’s rights around the world and improve child protection, including by addressing the illegal deportation and forcible transfer of Ukrainian children to Russia. The Minister will highlight Canada’s ongoing efforts to support the repatriation of Ukrainian children and Canada’s steadfast support for Ukraine’s sovereignty in the face of Russian aggression.

    Minister Joly will deliver Canada’s national statement to the General Assembly, during which she will highlight Canada’s unwavering commitment to promoting multilateral cooperation, human rights, democracy and the rule of law.

    While in New York, Minister Joly will participate in a series of events aimed at advancing gender equality and promoting women’s equal and meaningful participation in decision-making, including an event on the sidelines of the UNGA High-Level Week, which will feature women leaders from around the world. The Minister will also participate in an event aimed at ensuring reproductive choice for women and girls.

    In addition, Minister Joly will meet with numerous partners and allies, including G7 foreign ministers and other senior officials from around the world. Their discussions will focus on pressing global issues, including the situation in Gaza and the broader Middle East, as well as Russia’s continued aggression against Ukraine. During these meetings, Minister Joly will also emphasize the importance of strengthening the rules-based international order and protecting human rights and gender equality.

    In New York, Parliamentary Secretary Oliphant will attend a discussion on advancing the rights of women and girls as part of the Future Summit Action Days and participate in a meeting of the Commonwealth Ministerial Action Group to discuss key issues related to democracy and human rights in the Commonwealth, including in Bangladesh and Gabon. Discussions at the meeting will help advance the agenda for the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting in Samoa in October 2024.

    EDITOR’S NOTE: This article is a translation. Apologies should the grammar and/or sentence structure not be perfect.

    MIL Translation OSI

    September 29, 2024
  • MIL-OSI Video: Secretary Blinken hosts a G7+ Ministerial Meeting on Ukraine Energy Sector Support – 9:45 AM

    Source: United States of America – Department of State (video statements)

    Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken hosts a G7+ Ministerial Meeting on Ukraine Energy Sector Support in New York City, New York, on September 23, 2024.

    ———-
    Under the leadership of the President and Secretary of State, the U.S. Department of State leads America’s foreign policy through diplomacy, advocacy, and assistance by advancing the interests of the American people, their safety and economic prosperity. On behalf of the American people we promote and demonstrate democratic values and advance a free, peaceful, and prosperous world.

    The Secretary of State, appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate, is the President’s chief foreign affairs adviser. The Secretary carries out the President’s foreign policies through the State Department, which includes the Foreign Service, Civil Service and U.S. Agency for International Development.

    Get updates from the U.S. Department of State at www.state.gov and on social media!
    Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/statedept
    Twitter: https://twitter.com/StateDept
    Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/statedept
    Flickr: https://flickr.com/photos/statephotos/

    Subscribe to the State Department Blog: https://www.state.gov/blogs
    Watch on-demand State Department videos: https://video.state.gov/
    Subscribe to The Week at State e-newsletter: http://ow.ly/diiN30ro7Cw

    State Department website: https://www.state.gov/
    Careers website: https://careers.state.gov/
    White House website: https://www.whitehouse.gov/
    Terms of Use: https://state.gov/tou

    #StateDepartment #DepartmentofState #Diplomacy

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aL4tTyzS4gU

    MIL OSI Video –

    September 29, 2024
←Previous Page
1 … 169 170 171 172 173 174
Next Page→
NewzIntel.com

NewzIntel.com

MIL Open Source Intelligence

  • Blog
  • About
  • FAQs
  • Authors
  • Events
  • Shop
  • Patterns
  • Themes

Twenty Twenty-Five

Designed with WordPress