Category: United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Study shows our own voice is recognised above others but that new voices can also be prioritised into our ‘sense of self’

    Source: University of Abertay

    Study shows our own voice is recognised above others but that new voices can also be prioritised into our ‘sense of self’

    Whether or not we like the sound of it, our ability to pick out our own voice is highly developed. 

    But new research from Abertay academics has now suggested that our brain can also quickly learn to recognise a second voice over others if we are asked to think of it as our own. 

    The study, published in the British Journal of Psychology, set out to explore how our brains process both our own voice and recorded voices we have been assigned ownership of, with a view to informing a wide range of potential uses such as assistive technologies for speech impaired people or customised voices in video games.  

    Through a series of voice recognition tasks, researchers first tested how effectively participants could recognise a recorded voice that had been assigned to them to think of as their own. 

    The group was asked to listen out for words spoken by the ‘new voice’ assigned to them, but also those labelled as belonging to a ‘stranger’ and ‘friend’.

    Even after a very brief exposure to the sound of their assigned new voice, participants immediately became better at recognising it over the others, suggesting their brain had quickly taken ownership and prioritised the sound.

    In a second part of the study, participants’ own voices were recorded and added to the task, with results showing these were always recognised fastest.

    Dr Neil Kirk of Abertay University’s Department of Sociological and Psychological Sciences, who led the research, said the findings could be further developed to inform a variety of products or services.

    He said:

    With the recent rise in voice cloning tools powered by artificial intelligence, our work suggests there may be benefits to using a person’s own voice in digital technologies designed to enhance self-representation. For example, there could be potential uses in assistive devices for people who have lost the ability to speak, or in interactive entertainment in the use of custom online avatars. There’s also an interesting question for further exploration around our ability to take on new voices as our own in the digital world, and the benefits or issues that may have, particularly as our online and real-world interactions become ever more entwined.

    Professor Sheila Cunningham who collaborated on the project said:

    We know that our brains give special attention to information that relates to ourselves in some way, like hearing our own name being spoken across a noisy room. These results show that this additional prioritisation seems to be able to extend to new voices that we feel a sense of ownership over, showing how adaptable our sense of self can be.

    The full study, ‘Listen to yourself! Prioritisation of self-associated and own voice cues’ is available here.

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI USA: SPC Feb 16, 2025 1630 UTC Day 1 Convective Outlook

    Source: US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

     For best viewing experience, please enable browser JavaScript support.

    Feb 16, 2025 1630 UTC Day 1 Convective Outlook

    Updated: Sun Feb 16 16:09:38 UTC 2025 (Print Version |   |  )

    Probabilistic to Categorical Outlook Conversion Table

     Forecast Discussion

    SPC AC 161609

    Day 1 Convective Outlook
    NWS Storm Prediction Center Norman OK
    1009 AM CST Sun Feb 16 2025

    Valid 161630Z – 171200Z

    …THERE IS A SLIGHT RISK OF SEVERE THUNDERSTORMS FROM EASTERN NORTH
    CAROLINA NORTHWARD INTO THE DELMARVA…

    …SUMMARY…
    Scattered damaging winds and a brief tornado are possible from
    eastern North Carolina into parts of the Mid-Atlantic region through
    the afternoon.

    …Mid-Atlantic states and eastern NC…
    A powerful mid-level trough from the Upper Midwest into the
    Southeast will pivot northeast reaching New England this evening
    before evolving into a mid-level low. An accompanying 120-kt 500-mb
    jet over the southern Appalachians late this morning will move to
    the Mid-Atlantic coast by late afternoon. A broken low-topped
    squall line extends from eastern VA southward into eastern NC and
    northeast SC. Strong low-level warm/moist advection to the
    southeast of a deepening cyclone will act to destabilize parts of
    the Delmarva ahead of the approaching squall line where temperatures
    have warmed into the mid 60s with lower 60s dewpoints. Around
    250-500 J/kg SBCAPE to the east of the convective line will support
    a maintenance of convection given the strong large-scale forcing for
    ascent. Stronger portions within the broken convective line will
    aid in transporting intense lower tropospheric flow (60-70 kt around
    0.5 km AGL) to the surface in the form of sporadic damaging gusts
    (55-70 mph). The severe risk will cease as the line moves east of
    the coast later this afternoon.

    …North FL…
    The southern portion of the convective band will continue to
    gradually shift east across north FL through the mid afternoon. The
    12 UTC Jacksonville raob showed considerable inversion around 700 mb
    which will act to limit overall storm intensity despite diurnal
    heating. An isolated risk for damaging gusts will be the primary
    threat with this activity before storms diminish in intensity later
    this afternoon.

    ..Smith/Lyons.. 02/16/2025

    CLICK TO GET WUUS01 PTSDY1 PRODUCT

    .html”>Latest Day 2 Outlook/Today’s Outlooks/Forecast Products/Home

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: SPC MD 109

    Source: US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

    Mesoscale Discussion 109

    Mesoscale Discussion 0109
    NWS Storm Prediction Center Norman OK
    0728 AM CST Sun Feb 16 2025

    Areas affected…Northern New York…Northern New England

    Concerning…Winter mixed precipitation

    Valid 161328Z – 161930Z

    SUMMARY…Heavy snow will likely develop across parts of northern
    New York and northern New England this morning. Further south into
    parts of east-central New York and central New England, a mix of
    snow, sleet and freezing rain will be possible this morning.

    DISCUSSION…A mid-level trough will quickly move through the
    southern and central Appalachians this morning. A surface low will
    deepen and move northeastward into the Northeast. Ahead of the
    system, a band of strong warm-advection was located from New York
    eastward into the southern New England, where widespread
    precipitation is ongoing. The freezing line is currently located
    from southern New York eastward into southern New England. A zone
    (about 100 miles wide) of freezing rain and sleet is located to the
    north of the freezing line. This freezing rain and sleet will spread
    northward over the next few hours. A changeover to rain will occur
    as the freezing line moves northward. In addition, areas that are
    experiencing snow may changeover to freezing rain. Freezing rain
    rates could exceed 0.05 inches per hour.

    Further north into northern New England, surface temperatures are in
    the teens and single digits. The cold air in the low to mid-levels
    will make snow the primary precipitation type. As strong warm
    advection and isentropic lift increase across the region, the
    development of heavy snow will likely occur in many areas. Snowfall
    rates could exceed 1 inch per hour.

    ..Broyles.. 02/16/2025

    …Please see www.spc.noaa.gov for graphic product…

    ATTN…WFO…CAR…GYX…BOX…BTV…ALY…BGM…BUF…

    LAT…LON 43197054 42797083 42357095 42227144 42257364 42237611
    42237809 42297855 42527872 42797875 43207863 43387841
    43667772 43957661 44097625 44377600 44717549 44937500
    44987440 44997194 45087130 45287091 45867027 46206992
    46346945 46366911 46216857 46036820 45266735 44906732
    44666748 44396787 44166854 43756959 43407029 43197054

    Top/All Mesoscale Discussions/Forecast Products/Home

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: FCDO statement on the situation in DRC

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    The FCDO has released a statement following the entrance of M23 and the Rwandan Defence Force into Bukavu​: 16 February.

    An FCDO spokesperson said:

    “The entrance of M23 and the Rwandan Defence Force into Bukavu​ is a violation of DRC’s sovereignty and​ territorial integrity, and a breach of​  the UN Charter. This is a serious escalation that heightens the risk of a wider regional conflict – the human cost of which would be devastating​. The UK calls for an immediate cessation of hostilities, withdrawal of all RDF from Congolese territory and a return to dialogue through African-led peace processes. There can be no military solution.

    “The humanitarian situation in eastern DRC is critical. Close to a million people have already been displaced by this recent offensive and hundreds of thousands are now in desperate need of lifesaving support. It is appalling that vital aid routes have been cut off. All​ parties must restore humanitarian access as a matter of urgency.”

    Media enquiries

    Email newsdesk@fcdo.gov.uk

    Telephone 020 7008 3100

    Contact the FCDO Communication Team via email (monitored 24 hours a day) in the first instance, and we will respond as soon as possible.

    Updates to this page

    Published 16 February 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Joint statement on the first anniversary of Alexei Navalny’s death

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    The UK and partners pay tribute to Alexei Navalny

    On the anniversary of Alexei Navalny’s death, which followed years of persecution by the Kremlin, we again extend our condolences to his family. We reiterate that the ultimate responsibility for his death lies with the Russian authorities. One year on, Russia’s dire human rights record continues to deteriorate. The Kremlin crushes peaceful dissent, maintains a climate of fear and undermines the rule of law. All to serve its own interests. As we reflect on Navalny’s enduring legacy, we continue to stand with civil society and human rights defenders working tirelessly to build a better future for Russia in the face of immense personal risk. 

    There are over 800 political prisoners in Russia, including many imprisoned for speaking out against the Kremlin’s illegal invasion of Ukraine and the brutality shown towards the Ukrainian people. The UN Special Rapporteur’s reports illustrate how many political prisoners are tortured, denied adequate medical treatment and placed in forced psychiatric detention. We are clear: the Russian authorities must uphold their international obligations and release all political prisoners. 

    Australia, Canada, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Romania, Sweden and the United Kingdom

    Updates to this page

    Published 16 February 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-Evening Report: How Israeli propaganda filters into NZ media – drop it, says Mediawatch

    COMMENTARY: By Saige England

    Mediawatch on RNZ today strongly criticised Stuff and YouTube among other media for using Israeli propaganda’s “Outbrain” service.

    Outbrain is a company founded by the Israeli Defence Force (IDF) military and its technology can be tracked back to a wealthy entrepreneur, which in this case could be a euphemism for a megalomaniac.

    He uses the metaphor of a “dome”, likening it to the dome used in warfare.

    Outbrain, which publishes content on New Zealand media, picks up what’s out there and converts and distorts it to support Israel. It twists, it turns, it deceives the reader.

    Presenter Colin Peacock of RNZ’s Mediawatch programme today advised NZ media to ditch the propaganda service.

    Outbrain uses the media in the following way. The content user such as Stuff pays Outbrain and Outbrain pays the user, like Stuff.

    “Both parties make money when users click on the content,” said Peacock.

    ‘Digital Iron Dome’
    The content on the Stuff website came via “Digital Iron Dome” named after the State of Genociders’ actual defence system. It is run by a tech entrepreneur quoted on Mediawatch:

    “Just like a physical iron dome that scans the open air and watches for any missiles . . . the digital iron dome knows how to scan the internet. We know how to buy media. Pro-Israeli videos and articles and images inside the very same articles going against Israel,” says the developer of the propaganda “dome” machine.

    Peacock said the developer had stated that the digital dome delivered “pro-Jewish”* messages to more than 100 million people worldwide on platforms like Al Jazeera, CNN — and last weekend on Stuff NZ — and said this information went undetected as pro-Israel material, ensuring it reached, according to the entrepreneur: “The right audience without interference.”

    According to Wikipedia, Outbrain was founded by Yaron Galai and Ori Lahav, officers in the Israeli Navy. Galai sold his company Quigo to AOL in 2007 for $363 million. Lahav worked at an online shopping company acquired by eBay in 2005.

    The company is headquartered in New York with global offices in London, San Francisco, Chicago, Washington DC, Cologne, Gurugram, Paris, Ljubljana, Munich, Milan, Madrid, Tokyo, São Paulo, Netanya, Singapore, and Sydney.

    Peacock pointed out that other advocacy organisations had already been buying and posting content, there was nothing new about this with New Zealand news media.

    But — and this is important — the Media Council ruled in 2017 that Outbrain content was the publisher’s responsibility: that the news media in NZ were responsible for promoted links that were offered to their readers.

    “Back then publishers at Stuff and the Herald said they would do more to oversee the content, with Stuff stating it is paid promoted content,” said Peacock, in his role as the media watchdog.

    Still ‘big money business’
    “But this is also still a big money business and the outfits using these tools are getting much bigger exposure from their arrangements with news publishers such as Stuff,” he said.

    He pointed out that the recently appointed Outbrain boss for Australia New Zealand and Singapore, Chris Oxley, had described Outbrain as “a leader in digital media connecting advertisers with premium audiences in contextually relevant environments”.

    The watchdog Mediawatch said that news organisations should drop Outbrain.

    “Media environments where news and neutrality are important aren’t really relevant environments for political propaganda that’s propagated by online opportunists who know how to make money out of it and also to raise funds while they are at it, ” said Peacock.

    “These services like Outbrain are sometimes called ‘recommendation engines’ but our recommendation to news media is don’t use them for the sake of the trust of the people you say you want to earn and keep: the readers,” said Peacock.

    Saige England is a journalist and author, and member of the Palestine Solidarity Network Aotearoa (PSNA).

    * Being “pro-Jewish” should not be equated with being pro-genocide nor should antisemitism be levelled at Jews who are against this genocide. The propaganda from Outbrain does a disservice to Palestinians and also to those Jewish people who support all human rights — the right of Palestinians to life and the right to live on their land.

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Lights, Camera, Action! 40% business rates relief for film studios rolled out

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    From tomorrow (17 February), Local Authorities can begin rolling out local schemes for tax relief to help filmmakers produce the country’s next box office hits, rom-coms and cult classics.

    • Box-office boost for film studios as 40% relief on business rates roll out begins, lasting until 2034.
    • Creative sector, which includes film, is a vital industry of the future, worth over £120 billion to the UK economy, employing over 2.4 million people.

    Film studios are to receive business rates relief over the next nine years as the government rolls out a 40% reduction in business rates bills – to help drive growth and deliver the Plan for Change.

    From tomorrow (17 February), Local Authorities can begin implementing local schemes and awarding the tax relief to help filmmakers kickstart their journeys to producing the country’s next box office hits, cult classics and major rom-coms.

    The UK’s creative sector already employs over 2.4 million people and is worth over £120 billion to the economy. The start of the business rates relief for film studios rollout will help create the conditions to boost both of these.

    In October, the government confirmed that it would proceed with Film Studio Business Rates Relief that will be available for eligible studios in England until 2034, and, where applicable, will be backdated to 1 April 2024.

    Chancellor of the Exchequer, Rachel Reeves, said:

    The UK leads the world in creating great film and TV and we should all be immensely proud of the impact we’ve had across the globe.

    From the Avengers to Indiana Jones, the UK has drawn in some of cinema’s biggest names thanks to a combination of fantastic local talent and a world-leading creative sector as well as attractive tax incentives. 

    As part of the Plan for Change, we will continue to build the sector into a global beacon of home grown success, creating more jobs, more investment, and putting more money into working people’s pockets.

    This comes on top of a package of wider previous announcements for the creative industries announced on 17 January that included investments for start-up video game studios, grassroots music venues and creative businesses.

    The relief will maintain the UK’s status as a world leader in the creative industries and will help deliver the Plan for Change by going further and faster to kickstart economic growth so working people have more money in their pockets.

    The creative industries sector employs 2.4 million people and is worth £124.6 billion to the UK economy. Business rates relief forms part of the government’s wider strategy to support this vital growth sector, and forms a key part of our modern Industrial Strategy.

    The film and TV sector benefits from other generous tax reliefs. The Audio-Visual Expenditure Credit (AVEC) provides companies with a tax credit worth 34% of their UK production costs on a film or high-end TV programme, or 39% of their production costs on an animation or children’s TV programme.

    In addition, from 1 April 2025, film and high-end TV companies may claim a credit of 39% on their UK visual effects costs; and eligible films with budgets of under £15 million will be able to claim an enhanced 53% rate, known as the Independent Film Tax Credit.  

    Today (16 February), the UK film and TV industry will attend the BAFTA Film Awards that celebrate the many achievements of the sector and the significant cultural impact of British film and TV around the world.

    Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy said:

    The UK’s film industry is truly world class, producing global box office hits like Wicked and indie classics like Aftersun.

    The sector has huge potential for further economic growth and the government is ambitious for its future. Our new tax incentive, as well as other new measures like indie film tax reliefs and £25 million funding for a new film studio in Sunderland, will help ensure we can continue to create British content, international blockbusters and high quality jobs.

    Adrian Wootton OBE, Chief Executive of the British Film Commission:

    The British film and TV industry is a creative and economic powerhouse, and our film studios are a vital contributor to this success. Today’s confirmation of the Business Rates Relief for Film Studios in England is testament to Government’s recognition of this fact. The BFC is pleased that Government listened to the sector’s concerns and we are proud to have supported the development of this landmark intervention. We will continue to work with Government and stakeholders to secure the best possible long term solution for all parties.

    Harriet Finney, Deputy CEO and Director of Corporate & Industry Affairs, BFI said: 

    2024 saw a massive £5.6 billion of production spend in the UK, further confirming that our film and TV industries continue to be a powerful and vital growth industry. Our state-of-the-art studio spaces are central to that growth, so we welcome today’s announcement and the Government’s recognition of their crucial role in ensuring we can continue to make world-renowned UK film and TV and attract outstanding international productions, driving investment and creating jobs across the UK.

    Sara Putt, Chair, BAFTA said:

    The UK is a world-leading centre for film and TV production – our studios provide world-class facilities and the craft and production skills here are second to none, as showcased by the British-made films nominated in this year’s EE BAFTA Film Awards.  For those freelancers and crews to continue doing what they do best, it is vital that the UK remains competitive as a prospect for inward investment and continues to support a healthy talent pipeline to grow our domestic film and TV industry, so more UK talent and stories are celebrated at home and around the world.

    Simon Robinson, Chief Operating Officer of Warner Bros. Discovery Studios said:

    We welcome the Treasury’s announcement confirming its commitment to providing vital relief to business rates.  It will create a stable environment for long-term investment, including securing the Warner Bros. Studios Leavesden expansion, which will create 4,000 direct and indirect jobs, and the opportunity for continued growth of the industry in the UK and U.S.


    More information

    • The relief will be available on properties valued by the Valuation Office Agency (VOA) as film studios.
    • The 40% reduction is inclusive of Transitional Relief. The value of any Transitional Relief a studio receives will be deducted from the value of the film studio relief. This means that eligible film studios’ final bills will be no more than 60% of their gross bill. Studios will remain eligible for Improvement Relief in addition to this relief, which will mean that no ratepayer will face higher business rates bills for 12 months as a result of qualifying improvements to a property they occupy.
    • Film studios will not need to apply for the relief, as Local Authorities will award it to eligible properties. If in doubt, film studios should contact their local authority.

    Updates to this page

    Published 16 February 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Business Secretary fortifies UK steel industry

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    The Business Secretary launches the Plan for Steel Consultation, seeking views from stakeholders to inform development of the Steel Strategy.

    British steelmakers are being backed today by the Government as the Business Secretary launches the Plan for Steel Consultation. 

    This will look at the long-term issues facing the industry like high electricity costs, unfair trading practices, and scrap metal recycling – to protect jobs and living standards in the UK’s industrial heartlands. 

    Up to £2.5 billion will be put towards supporting the steel industry, as per the manifesto commitment, including via the National Wealth Fund. This could benefit regions across the UK – like Scunthorpe, Rotherham, Redcar, Yorkshire, and Scotland – which have a strong history of steel production. It will be spent on initiatives that will give the industry a long future – such as electric arc furnaces, or other improvements to UK capabilities. 

    This will drive growth in the economy – the priority of the Plan for Change – and protect our industrial heartlands for the long term. 

    But the Government is wasting no time in taking immediate action to support the industry. Just this week, Heathrow Airport announced a multimillion-pound investment, which will require 400,000 tonnes of steel – enough to build the Empire State Building.  

    This will give the industry a strong pipeline of business that will secure supply chains for years to come – and will drive economic growth as part of our Plan for Change. 

    This week the Government also simplified public procurement and aligned it with the Government’s missions, including the Industrial Strategy, to put UK firms – like the steel industry – in the best possible position to compete for and win public contracts. 

    That is on top of delivering a better deal for Port Talbot within weeks of taking office which will transform production at Port Talbot and deliver a modern Electric Arc Furnace, and implementing the British Industry Supercharger which will cut electricity costs for steel firms and bring prices more in line with international competitors. 

    This delivers on a manifesto commitment to secure the future of Britain’s steel industries – building on initiatives like the £22 billion investment in Carbon Capture Usage and Storage in Teesside and Merseyside – because the country’s industrial heartlands are too important to Britain’s heritage and will be supported by this Government.  

    Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds, said: 

    The UK steel industry has a long-term future under this Government. We said that during the election, and we are delivering on it now.  

    The deal announced by Heathrow this week will secure a strong industry pipeline for years to come – and we are putting the full weight of Whitehall behind the industry to build on this success. 

    Britain is open for business, and this Government has committed up to £2.5 billion to the future of steel to protect our industrial heartlands, maintain jobs, and drive growth as part of our Plan for Change.

    The Plan for Steel will help with the issues which have been holding the industry back for too long. It will look at ways to: 

    • Identify where there are opportunities to expand UK steelmaking to better support UK manufacturing, construction, infrastructure and growth – and secure UK jobs and livelihoods 

    • Protect the steel sector from unfair trading practices abroad 

    • Improve our scrap processing facilities so they can best support the steel-making of the future 

    • Encourage high usage of UK-made steel in public projects 

    To make the UK competitive globally, the Plan for Steel will examine the electricity costs for steel companies. 

    The Plan will also look at ways to improve the UK’s scrap metal processing capabilities, in light of the industry’s ongoing transition to electric arc furnace (EAF) steelmaking which recycles scrap steel by melting it to produce high-quality steel and other metals. 

    It will assess the UK’s primary steelmaking capabilities and primary production technologies with a commissioned independent review, currently being carried out by the not-for-profit Material Processing Institute, based in Teesside. 

    The Steel Strategy will also explore what can be done to protect the steel sector from unfair trading practices abroad and look at how it can attract and retain skilled talent in the UK. It will leverage the UK’s world-leading research and development capabilities to support the industry, aligning closely with the Government’s Trade Strategy, Strategic Defence Review and its upcoming Industrial Strategy. 

    The Government will work closely with the Steel Council towards the launch of the Steel Strategy in Spring, and the Council will continue to meet regularly following its publication to help drive investment into steelmaking communities across the country. 

    Gareth Stace, Director-General of UK Steel, commented: 

    “Developing the Steel Strategy must be a collaborative process, and the consultation is an open invitation for all stakeholders to help shape the future of UK steel. 

    “The Government’s commitment to our steel sector is both vital and welcome. A robust, bold, and ambitious Steel Strategy has the power to reverse the sector’s decline, particularly as we face increasing competition from imports benefiting from more favourable business conditions. By setting out a clear business plan and roadmap for investment, the Government can secure a brighter future for our industry, safeguard jobs, and support steelworkers and their families.” 

    Andy Prendergast, GMB National Secretary, said: 

    “After years of dithering, today’s plan provides desperately needed funding for our once proud, now beleaguered steel industry. 

    “As the world becomes more volatile, primary domestic steel making capacity is vital for both our economy and domestic security.” 

    Jon Bolton, Steel Council co-chair, said: 

    “Publishing a consultation so quickly after the launch of the Steel Council demonstrates the importance the government places on the steel strategy and the important role it plays as part of an Industrial Strategy.   

    “Thorough consultation is key, with a first round table held with steel consumers chaired by The Industry Minister where future market dynamics were discussed including the demand for Green Steel.   

    “This work will continue over the coming weeks and I urge all stakeholders to respond to the consultation, with the issuing of the Steel Strategy in the spring a key moment for the sector.” 

    Roy Rickhuss CBE, Community General Secretary, said:  

    “After a long era of neglect under the previous government, we welcome the government’s firm commitment to our steel industry.  

    “The new green paper sets out some of the main challenges and opportunities our steel sector will face over the years ahead – this consultation is an important step towards developing the government’s new steel strategy, and we look forward to engaging with the process at every step of the way.” 

    Notes to editors

    Updates to this page

    Published 16 February 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Joint G7 Foreign Ministers’ Statement: February 2025

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Meeting of G7 Foreign Ministers on the margins of the Munich Security Conference, 15 February 2025.

    The G7 Foreign Ministers of Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom and the United States of America and the High Representative of the European Union, met on the margins of the Munich Security Conference for the first time under Canada’s 2025 Presidency.

    The G7 members discussed Russia’s devasting war in Ukraine.  They underscored their commitment to work together to help to achieve a durable peace and a strong and prosperous Ukraine and reaffirmed the need to develop robust security guarantees to ensure the war will not begin again.  

    The G7 members welcomed their discussion today with Andrii Sybiha, Minister of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine.  They recalled the G7’s important contribution towards ending the war in Ukraine, including through measures pursuant to the G7 Joint Declaration of Support for Ukraine, by supporting Ukraine financially through the use of extraordinary revenues stemming from Russian Sovereign Assets, by imposing further cost on Russia, if they do not negotiate in good faith, through caps on oil and gas prices, and by making sanctions against Russia more effective. Any new, additional sanctions after February should be linked to whether the Russian Federation enters into real, good-faith efforts to bring an enduring end to the war against Ukraine that provides Ukraine with long-term security and stability as a sovereign, independent country.  The G7 members reaffirmed their unwavering support for Ukraine in defending its freedom, sovereignty, independence and territorial integrity.

    The G7 members discussed the provision to Russia of dual-use assistance by China and of military assistance by DPRK and Iran.  They condemned all such support.

    The G7 members discussed political, security and humanitarian issues in the Middle East, including in Israel, Gaza, Lebanon, Syria and Iran, and their commitment to advancing regional peace and stability.  They underscored the importance of a durable, Israeli-Palestinian peace.  They reaffirmed their support for the full implementation of the ceasefire reached between Israel and Hamas, including for the release of all hostages and the expansion of humanitarian aid in Gaza.  The G7 members stand behind the ongoing efforts of Egypt, Qatar and the United States in continuing to work towards a permanent ceasefire.  They reiterated their unequivocal condemnation of Hamas and the need to ensure that Hamas neither reconstitutes militarily nor participates in governance.  They recognized Israel’s inherent right to self-defence, consistent with international law. 

    The G7 members welcomed the outcomes of the International Conference on Syria, hosted by France on February 13, 2025.  They reiterated their shared commitment to the people of Syria and their support for an inclusive political transition process, in the spirit of UN Security Council Resolution 2254.  They welcomed, as well, positive developments in Lebanon, including the recent election of President Joseph Aoun, the designation of Nawaf Salam as Prime Minister, and the formation of a new government.  The G7 members reaffirmed their commitment to both countries’ stability, sovereignty, and territorial integrity.

    The G7 members unequivocally condemned Iran’s destabilizing actions, including its rapid advancement of uranium enrichment without credible civil justification, its facilitation of terrorism organizations and armed groups across the Middle East and Red Sea, its proliferation of ballistic missiles and drones, and its transnational repression and violation of fundamental human rights.

    The G7 members reiterated their commitment to a free, open and secure Indo-Pacific region, grounded in respect for the rule of law and sovereignty.  They strongly opposed any attempts to change unilaterally the status quo using force and underscored the importance of resolving disputes peacefully.  They strongly opposed China’s attempts to restrict freedom of navigation through militarization and coercive activities in the East and South China Sea. 

    The G7 members expressed serious concern over the DPRK’s nuclear and ballistic missile programs and reaffirmed their commitment to the complete denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula. They demanded that the DPRK abandon all its nuclear weapons, existing nuclear programs, and any other weapons of mass destruction (WMD) and ballistic missile programs in a complete, verifiable, and irreversible manner in accordance with all relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions (UNSCRs). They underscored that direct DPRK support for Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine marks a dangerous expansion of the conflict, with serious consequences for European and Indo-Pacific security. They urged the DPRK to cease immediately all assistance for Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, including by withdrawing its troops. The called upon DPRK to resolve the abductions issue immediately.

    The G7 members also discussed urgent situations of conflict and instability elsewhere in the world, including in the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Sudan, and in Haiti and Venezuela.

    The G7 Foreign Ministers looked forward to their meeting in Canada in Charlevoix, Quebec on March 12-14.

    Updates to this page

    Published 15 February 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Foreign Secretary and Defence Secretary: Bad peace deal with Russia will cause damage far beyond Ukraine

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments 3

    The Foreign and Defence Secretaries have written a joint Op-Ed in the Daily Telegraph on how to reach a strong and durable peace in Ukraine.

    For 20 years, Vladimir Putin has been repeating the mistakes of Russia’s past: by seeking to recreate the Russian empire and suffocate the countries around its borders.

    Too often in the past, the West has let him. We did too little in 2008, when he invaded Georgia, and in 2014, when he first went into Ukraine.

    When he launched his full-scale attack almost three years ago, he thought it would be more of the same. Putin believed that he would win his war in three days. Yet the Ukrainians continue to fight with huge courage and the support of their friends.

    Putin only responds to strength. Donald Trump and Volodymyr Zelensky have both spoken of their desire to achieve “peace through strength”. And the support we give to Ukraine provides the strength to achieve that peace. Ukraine, Britain, Europe and the US all agree.

    In Brussels this week, at the Ukraine Defence Contact Group – which we as the UK chaired for the first time – Pete Hegseth, the US defence secretary, confirmed that, like us, the US wants to see a sovereign, prosperous Ukraine.

    Like us, the US wants a lasting peace, after almost three years of war.

    Like us, the US recognises the failure of Minsk agreements, deals made from a position of division and weakness.

    At the Munich Security Conference this weekend, our message to our allies is the need for us all to continue to unite and show strength.

    The Prime Minister has signed a 100-year partnership with Ukraine – a testament to our long-term commitment and confidence in the country’s future. Including the new loans we are giving, which will be repaid using the windfall profits from frozen Russian assets, our support extends to £15 billion.

    And we are going farther still: this week, we announced an additional £150 million military package, part of the record £4.5 billion in support we are providing this coming year.

    A year on from the death of Alexei Navalny, we are also putting new sanctions on Putin’s inner circle, adding to 2,000 sanctions Britain has already put on Russia.

    From opposition and in government, we have been clear that Europe and the UK must do more together to share the burden of our continent’s security.

    [POLITICAL CONTENT REDACTED]

    We were clear we need our friends in Europe to invest more in defence and seize the opportunities of closer UK-EU cooperation.

    This has already begun. Europe is united on the need to step up. We are – and we will.

    Europe has now committed almost two thirds of all aid to Ukraine, and well over half the military aid. In 2021, the UK and US were two of only six allies meeting Nato’s 2 per cent defence spending target. That number is now 23.

    And we all need to turn up the pressure on Russia. Putin’s economy is struggling. Last year, the Kremlin spent more on military aid than social welfare for the first time since the collapse of the Soviet Union.

    Sanctions on energy are a particular priority: the UK has sanctioned more than 100 ships, as well as Gazprom Neft and PJSC Surgutneftegas, two of Russia’s big four oil companies.

    While Russia is weakened, it remains undeniably dangerous. Just this weekend, our Royal Navy will track Russian warships passing close to British waters. These ships are retreating from Syria after Putin abandoned his ally Bashar al-Assad, yet they remain armed and full of ammunition. We will be watching their every move.

    Ultimately, we need a strong peace. A durable peace. A peace that allows Ukrainians a secure future and deters any future Russian aggression. That is why there must be no talks about Ukraine without Ukraine, and we must give Mr Zelensky the strongest possible hand in those talks.

    A bad peace would not only harm our security, but our economies, too: Putin’s 2022 invasion took 1.5 per cent off global GDP and added 3 per cent to European inflation. China, Iran and North Korea are all watching.

    A durable peace must be based on new security arrangements: Europe doubling down to do more on our own continent’s security; a continuing, long-term US commitment to its allies through Nato; and British support to the US and allies in the Indo-Pacific – such as through the Aukus security partnership. That is the way to make us all stronger.

    On Feb 24, we will mark a grim milestone – three years since Putin’s full-scale invasion. Yet despite all the challenges, Ukrainians are showing astonishing tenacity. Now is the time to turn up the pressure on the Kremlin. With strength and unity, we will prevail.

    Updates to this page

    Published 14 February 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI USA News: Establishing the National Energy Dominance Council

    Source: The White House

    class=”has-text-align-left”>By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered:

         Section 1.  Policy.  America is blessed with an abundance of natural resources and is a leader in energy technologies and innovation that are critical to the economic prosperity and national security of the American people, as well as our partners and allies.  We must expand all forms of reliable and affordable energy production to drive down inflation, grow our economy, create good-paying jobs, reestablish American leadership in manufacturing, lead the world in artificial intelligence, and restore peace through strength by wielding our commercial and diplomatic levers to end wars across the world.  By utilizing our amazing national assets, including our crude oil, natural gas, lease condensates, natural gas liquids, refined petroleum products, uranium, coal, biofuels, geothermal heat, the kinetic movement of flowing water, and critical minerals, we will preserve and protect our most beautiful places, reduce our dependency on foreign imports, and grow our economy — thereby enabling the reduction of our deficits and our debt.
    It shall be the policy of my Administration to make America energy dominant.

         Sec2.  Establishment.  There is hereby established within the Executive Office of the President the National Energy Dominance Council (Council).

         Sec3.  Membership.  (a)  The Secretary of the Interior shall serve as Chair of the Council.  The Secretary of Energy shall serve as Vice Chair of the Council.
    (b)  In addition to the Chair and the Vice Chair, the Council shall consist of the following members:
    (i)      the Secretary of State;
    (ii)     the Secretary of the Treasury;
    (iii)    the Secretary of Defense;
    (iv)     the Attorney General;
    (v)      the Secretary of Agriculture;
    (vi)     the Secretary of Commerce;
    (vii)    the Secretary of Transportation;
    (viii)   the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency;
    (ix)     the Director of the Office of Management and Budget;
    (x)      the United States Trade Representative;
    (xi)     the Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy;
    (xii)    the Assistant to the President for Economic Policy;
    (xiii)   the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs;
    (xiv)    the Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy;
    (xv)     the Chairman of the Council on Environmental Quality;
    (xvi)    the Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers;
    (xvii)   the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy; and
    (xviii)  the heads of such other executive departments and agencies (agencies) as the President may, from time to time, designate.

         Sec4.  Functions.  (a)  The Chair shall convene and preside over meetings of the Council, in consultation with the Office of the Chief of Staff, provided that in his absence the Vice Chair shall preside.
    (b)  The Council shall:
    (i)    advise the President on how best to exercise his authority to produce more energy to make America energy dominant;
    (ii)   advise the President on improving the processes for permitting, production, generation, distribution, regulation, transportation, and export of all forms of American energy, including critical minerals;
    (iii)  provide to the President a recommended National Energy Dominance Strategy to produce more energy that includes long-range goals for achieving energy dominance by cutting red tape, enhancing private sector investments across all sectors of the energy-producing economy, focusing on innovation, and seeking to eliminate longstanding, but unnecessary, regulation;
    (iv)   advise and assist the President in facilitating cooperation among the Federal Government and domestic private sector energy partners; and
    (v)    advise the President on facilitating consistency in energy production policies included in the Strategy developed under subsection (b)(iii) of this section.
    (c)  In performing the advisory functions listed under subsection (b) of this section, the Council, through the Chair, shall, when appropriate, coordinate with the Assistant to the President for Economic Policy, the Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy, and the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs.  The functions of the Council shall report to the Office of the Chief of Staff.
    (d)  Within 100 days of the date of this order, and from time to time thereafter as deemed appropriate by the Chair, the Council shall:
    (i)    recommend to the President a plan to raise awareness on a national level of matters related to energy dominance, such as the urgency of reliable energy; the improvements in technology achieved through reliable energy sources; the national security concerns with removing reliable and affordable energy sources; the jobs supported by the energy sector; and the regulatory constraints driving up the cost of reliable energy to consumers;
    (ii)   advise the President regarding the actions each agency can take under existing authorities to prioritize the policy objective of increasing energy production, such as rapidly and significantly increasing electricity capacity; rapidly facilitating approvals for energy infrastructure; approving the construction of natural gas pipelines to, or in, New England, California, Alaska, and other areas of the country underserved by American natural gas; facilitating the reopening of closed power plants; and bringing Small Modular Nuclear Reactors online;
    (iii)  provide to the President a review of markets most critical to power American homes, cars, and factories with reliable, abundant, and affordable energy;
    (iv)   advise the President regarding incentives to attract and retain private sector energy-production investments;
    (v)    advise the President on identifying and ending practices that raise the cost of energy; and
    (vi)   consult with officials from State, local, and Tribal governments and individuals from the private sector to solicit feedback on how best to expand all forms of energy production.

         Sec5.  Administration.  (a)  The Council shall have such staff and other assistance as may be necessary to carry out its functions.
    (b)  Agencies shall cooperate with the Council and provide such assistance, information, and advice to the Council related to policies that affect energy dominance as the Chair or, at the Chair’s direction, the Vice Chair, shall reasonably request, to the extent permitted by law.

         Sec6.  Representation on the National Security Council.  The Secretary of the Interior, as Chair of the Council, shall serve as a standing member of the National Security Council.

         Sec. 7.  General Provisions.  (a)  Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:
    (i)   the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or
    (ii)  the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.
    (b)  This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.
    (c)  This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

    THE WHITE HOUSE,
        February 14, 2025.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Statement from the Attorney General on the case of Axel Rudakubana

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    The Attorney General Lord Hermer KC has released a statement following a request to review Axel Rudakubana’s sentence under the Unduly Lenient Sentence scheme.

    The Attorney General Lord Hermer KC said:

    The senseless and barbaric murder of three young girls in Southport last summer shocked our nation.

    No words come anywhere close to expressing the brutality and horror in this case. 

    It was understandable that we received multiple requests to review the sentence under the Unduly Lenient Sentence scheme – which is designed to identify and remedy gross errors made by judges.

    After careful consideration of independent legal advice and consultation with leading criminal barristers and the Crown Prosecution Service, I have concluded that this case cannot properly be referred to the Court of Appeal.

    No one would want the families to be put through an unnecessary further court process where there is no realistic legal basis for an increased sentence. 

    The 52-year sentence imposed by the judge was the second longest sentence imposed by the courts in English history.

    Rudakubana will likely never be released and will spend the rest of his life in jail.

    The Government have set out the next steps that must now take place to ensure that these awful murders will be a line in the sand.

    My thoughts today are with the friends and families of Bebe, Elsie, and Alice, as well as the other victims – your memories will not be forgotten.

    Updates to this page

    Published 14 February 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI Australia: First Japanese encephalitis case this summer

    Source: New South Wales Health – State Government

    Japanese encephalitis (JE) virus infection has been identified in a man who likely acquired his infection while camping in the Murrumbidgee region in NSW.
    NSW Health’s Executive Director of Health Protection Dr Jeremy McAnulty said this recent case, who is currently recovering in hospital, is likely to have acquired the infection in late December or early January while holidaying.
    “This case, along with recent detections in pigs and mosquitoes in NSW and detections in Victoria and Queensland, highlights the risk of JE virus infection in a large stretch of NSW west of the Great Dividing Range,” Dr McAnulty said.
    “It is very important for people who live in or travel to these areas to be aware of the elevated risk and to take precautions against mosquito bites. In addition to JE virus, Murray Valley Encephalitis, Kunjin, Ross River, and Barmah Forest viruses can also be spread by mosquito bites.
    “Importantly, there is a safe, effective and free vaccine to protect against JE which is available to anyone who lives or routinely works in various inland LGAs as well as for people who work in some other high-risk occupations.”
    JE vaccine is available through local General Practitioners, Aboriginal health services and pharmacists.
    People who meet the eligibility criteria should make an appointment with their GP, Aboriginal Medical Service or pharmacy and let the provider know it is for the JE vaccine. These providers may require a few days’ notice so they can order the vaccine.
    Actions to prevent mosquito bites include:

    Applying repellent to exposed skin. Use repellents that contain DEET, picaridin, or oil of lemon eucalyptus. Check the label for reapplication times
    Re-applying repellent regularly, particularly after swimming. Be sure to apply sunscreen first and then apply repellent
    Wearing light, loose-fitting long-sleeve shirts, long pants and covered footwear. and socks
    Avoiding going outdoors during peak mosquito times, especially dawn and dusk
    Using insecticide sprays, vapour dispensing units and mosquito coils to repel mosquitoes (mosquito coils should only be used outdoors in well-ventilated areas)
    Covering windows and doors with insect screens and checking there are no gaps
    Removing items that may collect water such as old tyres and empty pots from around your home to reduce the places where mosquitoes can breed
    Using repellents that are safe for children. Most skin repellents are safe for use on children aged three months and older. Always check the label for instructions
    Protecting infants aged less than three months by using an infant carrier draped with mosquito netting, secured along the edges
    While camping, use a tent that has fly screens to prevent mosquitoes entering or sleep under a mosquito net

    Information on eligibility for a free JE vaccine is available on Japanese encephalitis ​vaccination.
    JE virus cannot be transmitted between humans, and it cannot be caught by eating pork or other pig products.
    For further information on JE virus and ways to protect yourself visit Mosquito borne diseases.

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: School behaviour improving after mobile phone ban and vaping reforms

    Source: Australian Ministers for Education

    As students have returned back to school, new data shows student behaviour has improved after the Albanese Labor Government worked with states and territories to ban mobile phones in schools.

    It’s been one year since phones have been banned or restricted in all public schools, after Education Ministers agreed to put the ban in place from Term 1 2024 and schools are seeing the difference.

    A New South Wales survey shows 87 per cent of students are less distracted in the classroom and 81 per cent of students have seen improved learning, according to almost 1,000 principals.

    In South Australia, there has been a 63 per cent decline in critical incidents involving social media and 54 per cent fewer behavioural issues.

    The Albanese Government’s world-leading vaping reforms are also making a difference in our schools. It’s now been six months since new vaping laws banned the sale of them in corner stores and got rid of flavours like bubble gum and blueberry ice.

    Vaping rates have dropped by a third in 15 to 29-year-olds according to the South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI) when comparing 2024 to 2023. 

    And suspensions relating to vaping at South Australian schools have dropped by a staggering 50 per cent.

    The latest research from the Cancer Council’s Generation Vape study, also shows the number of young people aged 14 to 17 who vape is in decline.

    These positive school behaviour results come as the Government has also passed legislation last year that will deliver on its commitment to support parents and protect young people by setting a minimum age of 16 years for social media.

    The new laws will come into effect no later than 12 months from 10 December 2024, allowing the necessary time for social media platforms to develop and implement required systems.

    Setting 16 as the minimum age for accessing social media complements the work the Government is doing with states and territories to tackle bullying across the country.

    This work with states and territories is a national effort to deal with bullying in Australian schools and to provide children and parents confidence that no matter where their child goes to school, if they’re experiencing bullying, it will be managed in an appropriate way.

    The Albanese Labor Government is supporting parents, teachers and students in school and at home so every child has a happier, healthier start to life.

    Quotes attributable to Minister for Education Jason Clare:

    “Our ban on mobile phones and our ban on vapes are improving behaviour in classrooms. 

    “Teachers tell me these bans are making a world of difference. 

    “There are less distractions in the classroom and playgrounds are noisy again. Children are being children.

    “This is helping teachers and parents and supporting happier, healthier children.”

    Quotes attributable to Minister for Health Mark Butler:

    “As parents bring their kids back to school for the new school year, they can have confidence, as can teachers and young people themselves, that we have finally turn the corner on the scourge of vaping.

    “This data shows the Albanese Government’s vaping reforms are working to prevent a new generation from becoming addicted to nicotine.”

    Quotes attributable to Minister for Communications Michelle Rowland:

    “The Albanese Government is protecting young Australians from the harms that come with social media, and supporting mums, dads, and carers to keep their kids safe.

    “Keeping children safe is a collective responsibility, and we are stepping up to play our role.

    “We’ve listened to young people, parents and carers, experts and industry in developing these landmark laws to ensure they are centred on protecting young people – not isolating them.

    “We will continue to act in the interests of young people and vulnerable Australians.”

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Reed Joins Researchers & Medical Community in Opposing Major Cuts to Life-saving NIH Research

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Rhode Island Jack Reed

    PROVIDENCE, RI – Earlier this week, a federal judge temporarily blocked the Trump Administration’s attempt to make abrupt, unlawful cuts to research funding at universities, medical schools, hospitals and other scientific institutions administered by the National Institutes of Health (NIH).  A court hearing on the matter is scheduled for February 21st. 

    Along with the uncertainty that comes with any major litigation process, so does widespread alarm about what a potential loss of federal grant dollars would mean for the organizations and communities that rely on NIH funding, including those in Rhode Island.  If Trump’s funding cuts take effect, the University of Rhode Island, Brown University, Care New England, and Brown University Health stand to lose as much as $34.3 million, according to the Boston Globe, as innovative health research would be halted, clinical trials put on hold, and an entire generation of medical researchers could lose their career opportunities overnight.

    NIH is the primary source of federal funding for medical research in the United States and has partnered with academic and medical researchers nationwide to conduct groundbreaking research that has led to scientific discoveries and advancements that have saved and transformed lives. 

    But now the Trump Administration is attempting to suddenly slash billions of dollars of federal funding annually for U.S. research institutions, including local universities, hospitals, and medical centers.  The move could hamper progress toward prevention and treatment of illnesses like Alzheimer’s, cancer, and Parkinson’s disease, and ultimately lead hospitals and universities to lay off staff and shut down laboratories.

    Today, U.S. Senator Jack Reed held a press conference at Butler Hospital to oppose these short-sighted cuts that could endanger life-saving research, good-paying jobs, and economic growth in Rhode Island and nationwide.

    “NIH is a key driver of America’s strategic advantage in science and technology, and every American who has ever set foot in a hospital has directly benefitted from NIH-supported research.   President Trump’s proposed cuts would halt research, delay promising medical advancements, and eliminate jobs at universities and hospitals,” said Senator Reed.  “NIH has a proven track record of funding scientific breakthroughs and life-saving treatments.  I am heartened that my colleague, Congressman Amo, is taking a lead role in the House to fight these cuts because Congress must work on a bipartisan basis to uphold the law and the law is clear and prohibits modifications to NIH’s indirect costs.  Instead of wasting taxpayers money on costly litigation, I urge the Trump Administration to uphold its contractual obligations that are already in place, drop its attempt to ignore Congress’ funding directives, and stop impeding scientific research and advancement.”

    Twenty-two states, including Rhode Island, sued the Trump Administration, the Department of Health and Human Services, and NIH for unlawfully cutting these funds.  This week, federal judges ordered the Trump Administration to hold off on making $4 billion in NIH cuts.

    The indirect costs that are being targeted by these funding cuts include things like utilities, support staff, cleaning costs, and financial management, as well as employing students, supplying equipment, and more. Universities and hospitals may also use this funding to ensure research facilities are compliant with federal rules and regulations, such as data security and privacy.  The amount the federal government covers is not arbitrary or unknown, rather it is based on a preestablished rate applied to select expenses. The indirect funds are provided to universities and other research institutions in addition to the research award as part of the overall federal-private partnership.

    Studies show that every dollar in NIH funding spurs almost $2.50 in economic activity.  NIH funding supports hundreds of thousands of jobs across the country and generates an estimated $92.89 billion in economic activity.

    “Rhode Island has a thriving life sciences ecosystem, with a history of innovation in research and discovery fields like neuroscience, health and aging, immunology, RNA and cancer therapy. Scientific breakthroughs can only happen with the right infrastructure – top-notch researchers, supportive institutions and critical financial support,” said Dr. Mark A. Turco, President & CEO of the Rhode Island Life Science Hub. “Reducing indirect support has the potential to slow the advancement of groundbreaking scientific advances. The Rhode Island Life Science Hub remains committed to supporting the state’s institutions, partners and the wider scientific community to continue to advance innovation that drives economic growth and, most importantly, improves the well-being of people and patients.”

    “We are extremely grateful for Senator Reed’s leadership on this critical issue. The NIH cuts being proposed directly threaten Care New England and every hospitals’ ability to provide innovative research and ultimately advanced medical care. This change would jeopardize the health of the people of Rhode Island. In addition, we are deeply concerned about its negative impact on jobs and the economy.  For the sake of patients, healthcare staff, and our state’s economic well-being, we must all speak out as Senator Reed has,” said Michael Wagner, MD, President and CEO, Care New England Health System.

    “Care New England stands united with our healthcare and academic partners in opposing the recent National Institutes of Health (NIH) policy change that would drastically reduce funding for indirect costs of research. This reduction is not just an abstract financial figure—it directly threatens the critical infrastructure that allows us to provide world-class care and conduct the innovative research that benefits our patients, our community, and the state of Rhode Island. This change will have a profound impact on Care New England’s research operations, as well as the broader healthcare ecosystem, and we are deeply concerned about its long-term consequences on jobs and the economy. We appreciate Senator Reed’s leadership in addressing this issue and urge swift action to reverse this policy for the sake of our patients, our staff, and our state’s economic well-being,” said William Grobman, MD, Chief Scientific Officer, Care New England.

    “Discoveries at America’s research universities, like the University of Rhode Island, are changing lives and saving lives,” said Kerry L. LaPlante, PharmD, dean of the University of Rhode Island College of Pharmacy. “Researchers at URI are leading critical work around infectious diseases and neuroscience—like our groundbreaking research on microplastics and their impact on Alzheimer’s and dementia—as well as oncology, where we are identifying tumor development at its earliest stage. These discoveries are not possible without robust and sustained federal funding for the entire research ecosystem. Indirect costs are a critical piece of funding, and they are fundamental to advancing medical research and discovery and to the health and safety of researchers. Without these critical resources, the integrity, safety, and progress of scientific breakthroughs would be at risk. To stay competitive, Rhode Island must continue advocating for strong research funding—funding that fuels innovation, supports jobs, and sustains the research ecosystem and scientific discovery—and we are grateful to Senator Reed and our entire Rhode Island delegation for their leadership.”

    “At Brown University, in addition to halting critical research on a host of health challenges, from child mental health to Alzheimer’s disease to cancer, we estimate we’d have to cut roughly 200 jobs if the indirect cost rate is capped at 15 percent,” said Mukesh Jain, senior vice president for health affairs and dean of medicine and biological sciences at Brown University. “It’s also likely that we’d have to pause construction of the Danoff Labs in Providence’s Jewelry District, which will house research in aging, immunity, brain science, cancer and biomedical engineering, among other fields. These cuts have downstream effects on union construction jobs, building material purchases, and laboratory equipment. The ripple effects are felt through the local economy. We are thankful for Sen. Reed’s leadership on this issue.”

    During Trump’s first term in office, his Administration proposed deep NIH cuts but was rebuffed by Congress.  In the federal lawsuit filed this week, the plaintiffs contend that the past actions by Congress established funding practices that cannot be changed without Congressional approval. 

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Security: Summers County Man Sentenced to Prison for Federal Gun Crimes

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    BECKLEY, W.Va. – Matthew Harris England, 38, of Meadow Bridge, was sentenced today to one year and eight months in prison, to be followed by three years of supervised release, for being a felon in possession of a firearm and possession of an unregistered short-barreled shotgun.

    According to court documents and statements made in court, on April 3, 2023, law enforcement responded to reports of a domestic disturbance at England’s residence in Meadow Bridge. When law enforcement entered the residence, they found and seized a Savage model Stevens 94F, 20-gauge shotgun with a modified and shortened barrel and a modified and shortened stock on a chair in the living room. England was arrested, and told officers he knew the firearm was in the residence and that the length of its barrel appeared to be illegal.

    The short-barreled shotgun was not registered to England in the National Firearms Registration and Transfer Record as required by federal law. Federal law also prohibits a person with a prior felony conviction from possessing a firearm or ammunition. England knew he was prohibited from possessing a firearm because of his prior felony convictions for aiding and abetting the possession of stolen firearms in United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia on May 9, 2014.

    United States Attorney Will Thompson made the announcement and commended the investigative work of the Summers County Sheriff’s Department, the West Virginia State Police, and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF).

    Chief United States District Judge Frank W. Volk imposed the sentence. Assistant United States Attorney Lesley C. Shamblin prosecuted the case.

    This case is part of Project Safe Neighborhoods (PSN), a program bringing together all levels of law enforcement and the communities they serve to reduce violent crime and gun violence, and to make our neighborhoods safer for everyone. On May 26, 2021, the Department launched a violent crime reduction strategy strengthening PSN based on these core principles: fostering trust and legitimacy in our communities, supporting community-based organizations that help prevent violence from occurring in the first place, setting focused and strategic enforcement priorities, and measuring the results.

    A copy of this press release is located on the website of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of West Virginia. Related court documents and information can be found on PACER by searching for Case No. 5:23-cr-93.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI United Nations: Experts of the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights Commend the United Kingdom on Steps Taken to Provide a Real Living Wage, Ask Questions on Reported Discriminatory Legislation for Asylum Seekers and High Levels of Child Poverty

    Source: United Nations – Geneva

    The Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights today concluded its review of the seventh periodic report of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, with Committee Experts commending the steps taken to provide a real living wage, while asking questions on reported discriminatory legislation for asylum seekers and high levels of child poverty in the State party. 

    Joo-Young Lee, Committee Expert and Taskforce Member, said in its reply to the list of issues, the State party stated that the level of the minimum living wage for this year would be set at a level not below two-thirds of the median earnings in the United Kingdom.  For the first time, the cost of living would also be taken into account in this process, with the aim of providing a real living wage, which was commendable. 

    Seree Nonthasoot, Committee Expert and Taskforce Leader, said it had been reported that the discriminatory effects of such recent legislation as the Nationality and Borders Act 2022, the Illegal Migration Act 2023, and the Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Act 2024 had hindered access by migrants in an irregular situation and asylum seekers to social protection benefits.  Could the State party clarify if these hindering measures were in place and if social benefits would be ensured to this marginalised group?

    Julieta Rossi, Committee Expert and Taskforce Member, said the United Kingdom was one of the richest economies in the world, yet extremely high figures of poverty persisted. According to information, during the period 2022/2023, 21 per cent of the population lived in relative poverty, with alarming rates of 30 per cent in childhood, or 4.3 million children.  Was the State developing a strategy to achieve a drastic and short-term reduction of poverty, which prioritised child poverty and poverty of disadvantaged groups? 

    The delegation said last month, a new border security, asylum and immigration bill was introduced to parliament, which included the repeal of the Safety of Rwanda Act and amended the Illegal Migration Act, including the duty to remove individuals who had arrived in the United Kingdom immediately.  The Nationality and Borders Act remained in place, but all asylum claims were individually considered in line with international obligations. 

    Concerning child poverty, the delegation said the United Kingdom Government was developing a child poverty strategy to be launched in spring, as part of a 10-year strategy to address the issue.  The strategy would look at increasing incomes, reducing essential costs, and better local support.  The incoming Government had committed to ending dependence on emergency food parcels. In the financial year 2025/2026, funding of 742 million pounds would be devolved to local governments to help address this issue.

    Robert Linham, Deputy Director, Rights Policy, Ministry of Justice of the United Kingdom and head of the delegation, introducing the report, said the United Kingdom had a system of asymmetric devolution.  The position of the United Kingdom Government remained that incorporation was not necessary for the Covenant’s full implementation, which had been secured through a combination of policies and legislation.  But the Scottish Government had embarked on a programme to incorporate international treaties into Scots law.  Regarding the right to work, increasing the number of people in work was central to the United Kingdom Government’s mission to grow the economy.  Proposals, backed by 240 million pounds of investment, had been announced to reform employment support and create an inclusive labour market. 

    In concluding remarks, Mr. Nonthasoot extended appreciation to the United Kingdom delegation for its superb time and sequence management, which allowed the Committee to raise all relevant questions.  The Committee implored the United Kingdom to ensure that all Crown Dependencies and Overseas Territories under its control provided the highest standard of human rights to everyone. 

    In his concluding remarks, Mr. Linham said the dialogue had been rich and detailed, covering a variety of issues.  It was hoped that the Committee could see the efforts being undertaken in the whole of the United Kingdom to improve economic, social and cultural rights. 

    The delegation of the United Kingdom was comprised of representatives from the Ministry of Justice; the Ministry of Housing Communities and Local Government; the United Nations Human Rights and IMA Policy Team; the Department for Business and Trade; the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport; the Department for Education; the Department for Work Pensions; the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs; the Department for Energy and Net Zero; the Department of Health and Social Care; the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office; the HM Treasury; the Home Office; the Scottish Government; the Welsh Government; the Northern Ireland Executive Office; the Attorney General’s Chambers for the Isle of Man; the Government of Jersey; and the Permanent Mission of the United Kingdom to the United Nations Office at Geneva.

    The Committee’s seventy-seventh session is being held until 28 February 2025.  All documents relating to the Committee’s work, including reports submitted by States parties, can be found on the session’s webpage.  Webcasts of the meetings of the session can be found here, and meetings summaries can be found here.

    The Committee will next meet in public at 3 p.m. on Monday, 17 February to begin its consideration of the fifth periodic report of Rwanda (E/C.12/RWA/5).

    Report

    The Committee has before it the seventh periodic report of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (E/C.12/GBR/7).

    Presentation of Report

    ROBERT LINHAM, Deputy Director, Rights Policy, Ministry of Justice of the United Kingdom and head of the delegation, said the United Kingdom had a system of asymmetric devolution by which specified areas of responsibility were devolved to some or all of Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales.  For example, health and education were devolved to all three nations; social security was fully devolved to Northern Ireland but only in part to Scotland; and immigration was largely reserved to the United Kingdom Government.  The delegation also represented the three Crown Dependencies: the Bailiwick of Jersey, the Bailiwick of Guernsey, and the Isle of Man, as well as the 14 British Overseas Territories, home to 250,000 people. 

    One example of devolution in practice related to the incorporation of the Covenant into national law.  The position of the United Kingdom Government remained that incorporation was not necessary for the Covenant’s full implementation, which had been secured through a combination of policies and legislation; and further what it would take to incorporate the Covenant would not be justified by the benefits.  But the Scottish Government had embarked on a programme to incorporate international treaties into Scots law. Its incorporation of the Convention on the Rights of the Child, with two Optional Protocols, came into force last July; and the Scottish Government had committed, subject to the outcome of the next election, to introduce a human rights bill in the next session of Parliament that would give domestic legal effect in Scots law to the present Covenant and some other United Nations treaties.

    Since the restoration of the Northern Ireland Executive and political institutions in February last year, new initiatives had been launched, including an additional 25 million pounds to support early learning and childcare, the provision of free period products to anyone who needed them, and a strategy to end violence against women and girls.  The United Kingdom general election in June 2024 resulted in a change of government to the Labour Party.  In some areas, the approach had already changed quite radically, while other policies remained under review. 

    Regarding the right to work, increasing the number of people in work was central to the United Kingdom Government’s mission to grow the economy.  Proposals, backed by 240 million pounds of investment, had been announced to reform employment support and create an inclusive labour market. Last October, the Government also introduced an employment rights bill into the United Kingdom’s Parliament to increase workers’ rights to better working conditions and more secure work, and to improve industrial relations.  It also included protections from sexual harassment; gender and menopause action plans; and enhanced rights for pregnant workers.

    In the same vein, Guernsey enacted legislation that formally made discrimination on the grounds of race, disability, carer status, religion or belief, and sexual orientation unlawful, covering the fields of employment, the provision of goods and services, accommodation, and membership of clubs and associations.

    Regarding the right to health, England introduced the “Core 20 Plus 5” approach to reduce healthcare inequalities, amongst the most deprived 20 per cent of the population. The Government’s goal was to halve the gap in healthy life expectancy between England’s richest and poorest regions, which in 2020 stood at 10.8 years.  The mental health bill, introduced into Parliament last November, sought to address inadequate care of autistic people and people with learning disabilities, and reduce their unnecessary detention.

    Using newly devolved powers as part of its goal to eradicate child poverty, the Scottish Government introduced five payments to eligible families.  Three Best Start Grants provided one-off payments at key stages in a child’s life.  Best Start Foods was a regular weekly payment to help buy milk and healthy food.  And the Scottish Child Payment helped with the costs of supporting a family.  Similarly, Wales offered free school meals to all children in State primary schools.

    In cultural rights, the United Kingdom last year ratified the 2003 United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization Convention for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage.  In Wales, the Cymraeg 2050 Welsh Language Strategy saw almost 17,000 people studying with the National Centre for Learning Welsh in 2022/23, a 33 per cent increase over five years.  Regarding environmental commitments, finally, the Paris Agreement was extended to the Isle of Man, Jersey and Guernsey in 2022 and 2023. Mr. Linham said the United Kingdom was committed to upholding the rights set out in the Covenant. 

    Questions by Committee Experts

    SEREE NONTHASOOT, Committee Expert and Taskforce Leader, said the Committee, via the Secretariat, had received more than 72 submissions pertaining to the periodic report of the State party, probably the highest number thus far for any State party, which attested to the attention and interest that the international community and stakeholders gave to the State party and its report.  It was also important to note, following the submission of the report, that there was a general election in July 2024 and a new administration had since been appointed. 

    The Committee observed that the Covenant could not be applied directly by the State party’s domestic courts.  While there was alignment between the State party’s Human Rights Act 1998 and the European Convention on Human Rights, there was as yet no such transposition mechanism for the Covenant?  Was the Covenant applicable in Anguilla and Northern Ireland?  When would the nearly 50-year-old reservations to the Covenant be withdrawn?  Did the State party’s plan to ratify the Optional Protocol to the Covenant?

    The Committee recognised the State party’s record in introducing the first national action plan on business and human rights in the world in 2013, which was updated in 2016, and the Modern Slavery Act in 2015.  However, there was still an absence of a comprehensive legal framework for human rights due diligence, especially by United Kingdom companies in their transnational operations.  Could clarification on this be provided?  When would systematic and mandatory human rights due diligence be introduced? 

    Was the State party contemplating adopting a sectoral approach in the revision of the national action plan, where key sectoral performance indicators could be specified, for example in banking and finance, retail, construction, and health?  Did the State party intend to integrate effective remedial mechanisms, including legal aid to victims into the next national action plan and, more strategically, binding legislation? Would non-judicial recourse be provided for victims in extraterritorial cases?

    The Committee had scrutinised the 2024 report submitted to Parliament by the United Kingdom’s Climate Change Committee and found alarming findings.  The Committee concluded that only a third of the emissions reductions required to achieve the 2030 target were covered by credible plans, and low-carbon technologies must become the norm.  The Committee was also concerned that the devolved structure of the State party’s administrations had led to the fact that obligations arising from the Paris Agreement had not extended to all Crown Dependencies and Overseas Territories.  What was the concrete policy path to meet the action lines and targets, particularly home decarbonisation and adaptation?  How would the Paris Agreement have full coverage and effect in the territory of the State party?

    How was the State party addressing the tax system which had created negative impacts on vulnerable and marginalised groups, including the regressive nature of the value added tax on low-income households, and the welfare to work policies that posed a burden on people with disabilities?  In November 2024, the net public debt of the United Kingdom stood at 98.1 per cent.  How was this high public debt level impacting social budget programmes and what was the medium- and long-term direction on public debt management which would sustain basic public service investment and maintenance? 

    Could the State party provide policy trajectory on the concrete plan to tackle tax evasion and illicit financial flows, and in particular the reform of law and regulations in the British Virgin Islands, the Cayman Islands, Bermuda and other Overseas Territories that were indexed as tax havens?

    How did the new administration intend to address the regional disparity issue?  What were the cumulative impacts of the two austerity programmes implemented by the United Kingdom? 

    Had an assessment been carried out to implement the official development assistance restoration to 0.7% of the gross national income.  There were reports indicating that part of the development aid through British International Investment had caused impacts on key sectors responsible for delivering human rights, including health and education.  Could this be clarified?  The Committee was concerned by the lack of comprehensive anti-discrimination legislation; could the delegation provide more information around this? 

    While the State party had achieved good progress on gender equality, there were challenges in the fragmented and uneven legislative frameworks on women’s rights, particularly in Northern Ireland, Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies. There were also news reports of incidents of sexual exploitation and violence against women and young girls by ‘grooming gangs’ in places like Oldham, north Manchester. Was this an isolated incident or a common occurrence and what had been done to address the issue?

    It had been reported that the discriminatory effects of such recent legislation as the Nationality and Borders Act 2022, the Illegal Migration Act 2023, and the Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Act 2024 had hindered access by migrants in an irregular situation and asylum seekers to social protection benefits.  Could the State Party clarify if these hindering measures were in place and if social benefits would be ensured to this marginalised group?

    Responses by the Delegation 

    The delegation said there was no obligation to incorporate the Covenant under domestic law. Successive Governments had explored ratifying the Optional Protocol and the view of previous Governments was that the protections were negligible.  The Covenant was applicable in England, Wales, Scotland, the three Crown Dependencies and the Overseas Territories.  Some of the reservations existing in the name of the United Kingdom related to territories which were no longer part of the United Kingdom, including the Solomon Islands and Tuvalu which were no longer British Overseas Territories, but sovereign States in their own right.   

    The Scottish Government had developed proposals to give domestic legal effect to the rights contained in the Covenant, by incorporating them into the Scottish legal framework.  The Government aimed to deliver a clear and workable law for the authorities that would implement it. 

    The Prime Minister had announced a commitment to reduce emissions by at least 81 per cent by 2035.  The target covered all sectors and categories and was aligned with the Paris Agreement. The United Kingdom was committed to extending its ratification of the Paris Agreement to all Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies.  The Government had committed an additional 3.4 billion pounds to the “Warm Home Plan”, to support decarbonisation and cut bills for household heating. 

    The United Kingdom was committed to making the tax system fairer and more sustainable.  The Government had committed to not increasing tax on working people.  Recent tax changes had been targeted at the highest income households and working people had been largely protected from these tax increases.  Jersey was committed to introducing measures to reduce harmful tax measures.  Jersey’s 2019 economic substance law required companies to prove their genuine business activity, preventing those without real operations from artificially reporting profits. 

    A campaign had been launched against illicit finance.  At a recent joint ministerial council, the United Kingdom confirmed that Overseas Territories needed to implement fully public registers of beneficial ownership, which were key in targeting against corruption and tax evasion.  There were strong policies in place to monitor the impact of development aid programmes. 

    In recent years, there had been an increase in the representation of women in parliament, as well as in senior positions in the private sector, where women now represented 41 per cent.  The United Kingdom had mandatory gender pay gap reporting, which had shown a significant close in the size of the gender pay gap.  The current Government had introduced a bill which would introduce a new duty on employers to outline how they planned to close the gender pay gap. 

    There had been no agreement on a single equality bill in Northern Ireland, but numerous statutes had been enacted over the past few years.  Legislation now prohibited less favourable treatment in employment, education and public functions among others. 

    The safety of children was of paramount importance, but for too long grooming gangs had operated, victims had been ignored, and perpetrators had gone unpunished.  A 10-million-pound action plan to tackle grooming gangs and child sexual abuse had been announced, which would allow victims to have the chance to have their cases re-heard.  Survivors and victims would allow their closed cases to be reviewed by an independent panel, when they previously were not taken forward to prosecution by the Crown.  An audit would begin soon which would draw on the views of victims and survivors. 

    Last month, a new border security, asylum and immigration bill was introduced to parliament, which included the repeal of the Safety of Rwanda Act and amended the Illegal Migration Act, including the duty to remove individuals who had arrived in the United Kingdom immediately.  The Nationality and Borders Act remained in place, but all asylum claims were individually considered in line with international obligations. 

    Questions by Committee Experts

    SEREE NONTHASOOT, Committee Expert and Taskforce Leader, said reports had been received that the Northern Ireland human rights commission was at risk of losing its A status due to insufficient funding.  The Committee would like to raise this concern.  Why did the United Kingdom not adopt the same approach as the Scottish Government in incorporating the Covenant in domestic legislation so that all people could enjoy protection from the Covenant?  What was the State doing to reduce homelessness?  The Committee was very concerned that violent incidents against women would become systematic.  There should be a clear indication on how to prevent this type of violence. 

    JOO-YOUNG LEE, Committee Expert and Taskforce Member, asked what measures the Government would take to give full legal effect to the Covenant, and ensure victims of violations of economic, cultural and social rights had full access to legal remedies?  The Committee was pleased the Scottish Government had proposed the human rights bill, and hoped the provisions of the Covenant would be incorporated.  What was the plan to enact a bill of rights for northern Ireland?

    A Committee Expert asked how the State was planning a social green transformation? 

    Another Expert asked if there were any developments underway regarding the participation of the United Kingdom in the revised European Social Charter? 

    Responses by the Delegation 

    The delegation said all three of the human rights institutions had A status and adequate funding for their role.  At the most recent review of Northern Ireland, it was re-accredited with A status, and a baseline budget review had been launched for the Commission in 2024. 

    There was no obligation for direct justiciability for the rights of the Covenant under domestic law. The United Kingdom had no plans to ratify the revised European Social Charter. 

    It was intended that legislation in Scotland would increase accountability for the Covenant. 

    The debt to gross domestic product ratio was expected to fall in the final year of the five-year forecast. 

    The State would upgrade five million homes across the country through new technologies, including solar heat pumps and installation.  The transition to warmer, decarbonised homes would include support for the most vulnerable to combat fuel poverty.  Climate change would have a disproportionate impact on the most vulnerable of society, including those with pre-existing medical conditions.  The country’s climate change risk assessment took this into account and built into the development of the National Adaptation Programme.  It was essential that transition plans to net-zero were resilient in themselves.

    The Government was working on a strategy to end homelessness.  Last year, a funding increase was announced for homelessness services and initiatives were announced to allow renters to challenge rental increases. 

    Tackling violence against women and girls was a priority for the Government, and the State pledged to halve violence against women and girls within the next decade. 

    Questions by Committee Experts

    JOO-YOUNG LEE, Committee Expert and Taskforce Member, said that according to information that the Committee had received, although some employment gaps gradually narrowed over time, ethnic minorities, women, young people, and persons with disabilities continued to face higher levels of unemployment and were more likely to be in a low-paid jobs.  How had the State party analysed the underlying causes of employment and pay gaps, and what was the impact of these measures on ethnic minorities, women, young people and persons with disabilities in their access to decent work?

    Information received by the Committee indicated that the level of national minimum wage and national living wage was insufficient to ensure an adequate standard of living for workers, as it did not keep pace with the rising cost of living.  In its reply to the list of issues, the State party stated that the level of the minimum living wage for this year would be set at a level not below two-thirds of the median earnings in the United Kingdom. For the first time, the cost of living would also be taken into account in this process, with the aim of providing a real living wage, which was commendable.  Had the State party adopted a methodology for determining the level of the national minimum wage and the national living wage that was indexed to the cost of living. 

    What measures were being taken to address precarious work such as exploitative zero-hour contracts and to enhance security of employment?  What measures were taken to protect workers from labour exploitations and to impose appropriate sanctions on those responsible?  The Committee noted that the State party planned to establish a single body, a Fair Work Agency, to enhance the effectiveness of the protection of workers.  How would it be ensured that the body had necessary 

    powers and resources to effectively monitor working conditions and protect workers?  What measures were taken to ensure the right to strike?

    According to information received by the Committee, the level of social security benefits was not sufficient for a decent standard of living.  Information indicated that the social security system, including the Universal Credit, was not providing people with adequate social protection. What measures were being taken to ensure that the level of social security benefits was adequate and determined by an assessment of the real cost of an adequate standard of living?  Had the State party carried out an assessment of the impact on people of such measures as the benefit cap, the two-child policy, the so-called “bed-room tax” and the five-week wait, and if so, what measures were being taken to address these impacts?  What measures were being taken to ensure that any conditions for benefits were proportionate and did not result in stigmatisation and degradation of claimants?

    What measures had the State taken to ensure the availability, accessibility, and affordability of quality childcare, including childcare for disabled children?

    How was it ensured that quality social care was available, accessible, and affordable for adults who needed care and support, including older persons?

    Responses by the Delegation 

    The delegation said the creation of the national minimum wage had been one of the most successful economic interventions in the United Kingdom in the past 25 years.  The Government was determined to deliver a genuine living wage and had asked the Low Pay Commission to take account of the cost of living in recommending the appropriate rates for 2025 onwards.  The Low Pay Commission expected that three million low paid workers would receive a pay rise.  The Government had recently introduced an employment rights bill which would include a right to guaranteed hours.  There would be new rights to reasonable notice of shift cancellations, and the bills would close loopholes regarding scrupulous “fire to hire” practices. The Government aimed to protect workers and business from the minority of employers who broke the rules.   

    Migrant workers had the same employment rights and protections as other United Kingdom workers, including the minimum wage and protection against discrimination.  In 2023, it was ensured that all seasonal workers would receive at least 32 hours of work per week, and the minimum wage was also raised. 

    The employment rate for people of Bangladeshi and Pakistani origin had increased in recent years; historically this was low in the United Kingdom.  Levels of qualifications at schools were lower for some ethnic groups, which affected employment opportunities.  The State was planning to introduce mandatory pay reporting by ethnicity and disability. 

    A whitepaper would be published setting out the reforms expected by the Government on health and disability.  There were a range of ethnic minority support mechanisms in place. 

    The current rates of income-related benefits did not represent a minimum requirement, which could vary depending on people’s circumstances.  The current Government had committed to reviewing universal credit to tackle poverty.  The new child poverty strategy would focus on the benefit cap and the two-child limit. The Department for Work and Pensions published a range of independent evaluations in a wide range of social policy, including households below-average incomes. 

    The Government would provide more than eight billion pounds this year for education, representing a 30 per cent increase from the previous year.  Tax free childcare was a United-Kingdom wide offer to support parents to return to work, or work more when they needed to.  Families could receive up to 2,000 pounds per child per year, or 4,000 pounds if the child had a disability.   

    A fund could be used to increase funds paid to adult social care providers and reduce waiting times. The Care Act 2014 placed emphasis on local authorities to shape their care market, making sure they were meeting the needs of the local population. 

    In 2022, the Scottish Government published a refreshed Fair Work Vision, with a key goal of reducing the gender pay gap.  The median gender pay gap had decreased from 15.6 per cent in 2016, to 9.2 per cent in 2024. The disability employment had been reduced to around 37 per cent, which was its lowest level, with plans to halve the gap by 2028.  The Scottish Government was delivering 15 social security payments and was investing around 6.9 billion pounds in social security payments. 

    Questions by Committee Experts

    JOO-YOUNG LEE, Committee Expert and Taskforce Member, asked how the State would ensure the income-related benefits were adequate for those living in disadvantaged situations?  According to information, there may be a gap among the poorest of families for accessing childcare entitlements, particularly families that were not working. Could this be clarified? 

    A Committee Expert asked for examples where violations of the right of women workers compared to men had been judicially assessed?  What remedies were applied?

    Another Expert asked if there were plans for a participatory poverty assessment to be conducted every few years to identify those who were affected?   

    SEREE NONTHASOOT, Committee Expert and Taskforce Leader, asked if indexation based on inflation would be adopted, to more accurately reflect the living wage? 

    JULIETA ROSSI, Committee Expert and Taskforce Member, asked about the two-child cap on certain social security benefits, including universal credit.  This cap could have a huge impact on child poverty levels.  What was the rationale behind this?  What were the obstacles to immediately repealing the two-child limit?  The State had a high level of child policy, up to 30 per cent, so the Committee would appreciate more information being provided on this subject.

    Responses by the Delegation 

    The delegation said income-related benefits were rated annually in the United Kingdom, based on the level of the consumer-prices index.  As such, benefits for 2025 would be increased by 1.7 per cent.  The two-child cap was introduced as the United Kingdom faced a financial crisis a few years ago.  There was absolutely a relationship between the cap and the number of children in poverty.  The cap remained in place, but a taskforce was reviewing how the State would tackle the high levels of child poverty in the country, and would determine the best steps in this regard.  Removing the cap depended on the United Kingdom’s fiscal position. 

    The Low Pay Commission made annual recommendations on the appropriate rates of entities such as the minimum wage.  The Government’s impact assessment for 2025 found that women, younger and older workers, workers with a disability, and those from ethnic backgrounds, were more likely to be in minimum wage drops and more likely to benefit from the raising of the minimum wage in April 2025.  The Government had committed to reviewing the parental leave system to ensure it offered the best support to working families. 

    The Scottish Government had used other policies to determine the real living wage, including when issuing public sector grants and other funding.  The proposed human rights bill would aim to meet standards pertaining to the Covenant. 

    Working parent entitlements were established to support parents to return to work, which was why that entitlement was contingent on work.  Non-working families could access 15 hours of Government-funded early education. 

    The Education Minister in Northern Ireland was committed to bringing forward a strategy which would make childcare more affordable, among other initiatives.  A new childcare subsidy scheme had been implemented, and preschool education had been expanded, allowing more than 2,000 additional children to receive a fulltime place in 2025. 

    Questions by Committee Experts

    JULIETA ROSSI, Committee Expert and Taskforce Member, said the United Kingdom was one of the richest economies in the world, yet extremely high figures of poverty persisted.  According to information, during the period 2022/2023, 21 per cent of the population lived in relative poverty, with alarming rates of 30 per cent in childhood, or 4.3 million children.  Was the State developing a strategy to achieve a drastic and short-term reduction of poverty, which prioritised child poverty and poverty of disadvantaged groups? What measures had the State implemented in response to the recommendations of the review of child welfare care, as well as those issued by the Committee on the Rights of the Child in June 2023?

    According to statistics, food insecurity increased from 4.7 million to 7.2 million between 2021/22 and 2022/23, especially affecting low-income households.  What was the Government doing to address this alarming situation?  According to reports, there was a persistent housing crisis in the State party, including increasing rates of homelessness in the country, with most being women. Housing prices were high, as were mortgage rates, with rents rising higher than inflation in some parts of the country.  The lack of affordable housing for persons with disabilities was a factor which determined that they remained institutionalised, and there was inadequate initial accommodation for asylum seekers, among other issues.  What was the Government doing to address this crisis? 

    According to independent research commissioned by the Government in 2024, the National Health Service in England was in critical condition due to lack of funding, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, staff shortages and inefficiency in management. What were the details of the results of the investigation, and the drafting of a 10-year plan to address these issues? 

    Suicide rates remained high in the country, especially among men.  Persons with disabilities, gypsy, Roma and nomadic communities had high suicide rates compared to the general population.  Could information about the new mental health bill for England and Wales be provided?  What were the developments in other jurisdictions?

     

    Data from 2020 to 2022 showed the highest maternal mortality rates in England since 2003 to 2005, with a disproportionate impact on women in the most deprived areas. What were the results of the research commissioned by the Task Force on Maternal Disparities in 2022 and the policies in place to address this issue?  Access to sexual and reproductive care across the UK showed regional disparities; what measures had been adopted to unify this? 

    There had been a huge increase in drug-related deaths in the State party.  What plans and strategies were in place to prevent deaths, taking into account the disproportionate impact on certain communities? Were there plans to review the criminalisation of personal consumption and expand harm reduction services, including supervised drug consumption rooms?

    Responses by the Delegation 

    The delegation said the United Kingdom Government was developing a child poverty strategy to be launched in spring, as part of a 10-year strategy to address the issue. The strategy would look at increasing incomes, reducing essential costs, and offering better local support.  The incoming Government had committed to ending dependence on emergency food parcels.  In the financial year 2025/2026, funding of 742 million pounds would be devolved to local governments to help address this issue.

    Concerning support for families, the State’s response published in 2023 was to shift the focus away from crisis intervention and towards early help for families, ensuring children remained with their families as much as possible.  This was a multidisciplinary support offer which would work with the entire family at the earliest level possible.  When children could not remain with their families, they were supported to live with kinship families or foster families. 

    A social supermarket programme had been rolled out across all areas in Northern Ireland from 2022 to address food poverty.  Other support included debt and benefits advice, health food advice, and cooking on a budget.  A programme to tackle organized crime was established in 2016 and it had been extended until 2027.  Sexual and reproductive health services were provided across all five trust areas in Northern Ireland.  There were workforce challenges and the need for further investment. 

    The United Kingdom Government had committed to support first time home buyers.  The Government was seeking to deliver the biggest increase in affordable housing in a generation, with 110,000 to 130,000 social homes to be built over the next five years.  Since 2021, local authorities in England were required to ensure victims of domestic abuse and their children could access safe accommodation.  The Government would invest 160 million pounds in domestic safe accommodation in the next financial year. 

    Concerning Travellers, the Government aimed to ensure fair and equal treatment for them.  The revised policy for Traveller sites outlined that accommodation for Travellers should provide access for healthy lifestyles and health services. 

    The Scottish Government regarded poverty as a huge concern and had implemented the Child Poverty Act, which required poverty reduction plans to be published every four years.  Actions in the plans included raising incomes and lowering essential costs.  The Scottish Government had committed over three million pounds for remote rural and island health care.  The aim was to develop a model where services were provided as locally as possible, to ensure equitable outcomes. 

    Progress had been made in maternal care in the rural north of Scotland, via the plan which focused on restoring obstetric maternity care in the area.  The Scottish Government acknowledged that the number of drug and alcohol related deaths in Scotland remained too high.  The Government had launched a five-year mission to combat this, and the first “Safer Drug Consumption” facility in the United Kingdom had been opened in Glasgow last year. 

    One of the Government’s priorities was to clear the asylum backlog claims, and ensure people were housed in more effective and supervised accommodation.  Due to the exceptional number of unaccompanied children arriving in the United Kingdom from 2020, the Home Office had opened hotels to support these children, with a team residing within the hotels to support each child.  The teams included staff to provide medical and psychological support.  When the last hotel closed in 2024, all remaining children went directly into State care.  The United Kingdom had no plans to legalise or decriminalise drugs. 

    The mental health bill was introduced in November 2024 and would modernise the mental health act, including through addressing unnecessary detentions shaped by racial disparity.  The suicide strategy for England looked at what could be done for groups with higher suicide rates, including autistic people, Roma, refugees, asylum seekers and lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex persons.   Anyone in England experiencing a mental health crisis could speak with a trained member of the National Health Service on the phone.  An additional 150 million pounds had been invested over the past two years to support mental health services.  Fifty million pounds would be invested into research into maternity inequalities to improve outcomes for all women.  England supported harm reduction activities, including needle and syringe testing.

    Welsh Ministers had a duty to submit child poverty objectives, and report on them every three years.  There was a targeted school meals programme for children. Over 3.4 million pounds had been made available as a capital grant fund for local Welsh authorities to fund residential or transit sites for Travellers.  The Welsh Government was currently finalising a new mental health strategy, with a focus on tackling inequalities. 

    Questions by Committee Experts

    A Committee Expert commended the delegation for being so well prepared and for their excellent time management.  What steps had the State party taken to ensure a more just and equitable financial architecture which prioritised human rights in lending policies?  What steps had the State taken for cancelling debt for countries in debt crisis?  What was the State party’s position on the use of compulsory license to promote access to health products in foreign countries? 

    SEREE NONTHASOOT, Committee Expert and Taskforce Leader, said the Scottish Government had provided a good example of safer drug consumption facilities.  Why did this not go hand in hand with decriminalisation?  What was the trajectory of decriminalisation?  Would the United Kingdom adopt a universal drug 

    policy which covered all its territories?

    JULIETA ROSSI, Committee Expert and Taskforce Member, said there was a pressing need to implement the child poverty strategy as soon as possible.  Could a more specific timeline for its implementation be provided?   The United Kingdom was one of the wealthiest countries in the world and had an obligation to earmark resources to reverse the situation of poverty in the country. How was the State addressing the issue of energy poverty? 

    JOO-YOUNG LEE, Committee Expert and Taskforce Member, said there was a concern that rent rises, in combination with a lack of social housing, were putting families at risk of homelessness.  What was being done to address this issue?

    Another Expert asked for measures adopted to address child obesity?  Were taxes on junk food being increased?

    An Expert asked about the emergency response in Northern Ireland to address the large number of deaths of homeless people?

    A Committee Expert asked what indicators were used to measure poverty?  Did the State use the multidimensional poverty index?

    Responses by the Delegation 

    The delegation said the child poverty strategy would be published in the spring, but acknowledged that people living in poverty needed help now.  In the meantime, steps had been taken to reduce the universal credit rate, which would benefit 1.2 million households.  Some of the challenges around food poverty related to incomes, rather than access to food, and this was being addressed in the food poverty strategy.  The United Kingdom used the universally recognised definition of poverty, which was measured by income. 

    There were no plans to change United Kingdom drug laws.  There was clear medical and scientific evidence which showed that controlled drugs were harmful.  There were no plans to extend United Kingdom drug legislation to the Overseas Territories.

    The United Kingdom had committed 1.6 billion pounds to Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, which was committed to sustainable and equitable access of vaccines.  The National Health Service had doubled investment in gender dysphoria services and increased the number of clinics from seven to 12. 

    Obesity was concentrated within the most deprived areas.  The Government was addressing this by limiting school children’s access to fast food, preventing advertisements of the least healthy foods, and delivering schemes such as the healthy milk and the school fruit and vegetables scheme. 

    The United Kingdom was committed to working with partners to tackle unsustainable debt and coordinated with other official creditors to provide debt relief and promote debt sustainability for developing countries. 

    Scotland had released the Good Food Nation Plan in 2024, setting out the objectives the Government aimed to achieve on food related issues.  The long-term strategy for housing was published in 2021, addressing housing supply across the whole country, affordability and choice, and housing’s role in achieving net zero. 

    Northern Ireland was tackling homelessness through a strategy and had developed a strategic action plan for accommodation.  Funding for homelessness services would increase to nearly one billion pounds in England in the next financial year to prevent rough sleeping.

    A levy was applied to pre-packaged soft drink with an added five grams of sugar per 100 millilitres; drinks that contained less than five grams of sugar did not pay the levy, which was paid by packagers and importers.  The Government had committed an additional 3.5 million pounds over the next few years for the warm homes plan, with multiple targeted schemes in place to deliver energy assistance to low-income households.   

    The United Kingdom was supportive of the development of a new sharing and benefits system to support adequate and fair sharing of benefits, and was committed to working with African partners to develop such a system.

    The United Kingdom published multi-dimensional poverty measures annually. The Government’s priority was to grow the economy, as this was the best way to improve living standards. To achieve growth, decisions on tax and spending needed to be balanced. 

    Questions by a Committee Expert

    LAURA CRACIUNEAN-TATU, Committee Chair and Taskforce Member of the United Kingdom, said in England and Wales, the attainment gaps in education were widening, with inadequate measures to address them.  In Scotland, the new bill on education had been criticised as it failed to address urgent needs, and there were high levels of bullying in school, including incidents of misogyny and racism.  There were also major issues of bullying in Northern Ireland, including cyberbullying, on the grounds of race, sexual orientation, gender identity or sex characteristics, disability, migration or other status.  Traveller and Roma children had some of the lowest levels of educational attainment.  Acts including the Special Needs Disability Act 2016 and the Integrated Education Act 2022 had not been fully implemented.  For Jersey, measures to address the poverty-related attainment gap were inefficient, and the Jersey premium had limited impact. 

    What measures had been implemented to address these challenges, and what were the concrete results? How were they evaluated in terms of impact and implementation?  How was it ensured that all educators were trained on bullying and what targeted measures were in place to address this issue?  Did children of migrant families have access to education, including language support, uniform grants, school meals and school transport?  How was it ensured that Traveller and Roma children remained in the educational system?  In Northern Ireland, there were currently 72 integrated schools; was there a plan to increase this number?  Was there any evaluation of the impact of the Jersey premium in reducing the attainment gap?  Were there any plans to address legislation to balance between the right to light work and the full benefit of education for children?

    Had the Irish Language Commissioner been appointed?  What measures were in place to ensure that the arts sector in all jurisdictions received sufficient, secure, long-term funding proportional to inflation, and that the right to take part in cultural life was not affected by the cost-of-living increases?  What measures were in place to ensure access to sport for transgender persons and persons with disabilities?

    Could information be provided on the status of the proposed Northern Ireland Troubles (Legacy and Reconciliation) Bill and how it would contribute to fostering intercultural dialogue and reconciliation?

    Responses by the Delegation

    The delegation said last year, a proposal for a draft remedial order was introduced into the United Kingdom parliament, as the first step to repeal and replace the Legacy Act. 

    The Government wanted to see more people engaging in physical activity, and that included transgender persons.  A different approach was required in competitive sport, where the Government had a responsibility to protect the integrity of women’s sport.  Each sport was different, and the Government worked with all sports organizations to prioritise integrity while also being inclusive.  For instance, tennis and golf had decided to protect the fairness of competition at the competitive level, but adopt a more inclusive approach at the recreational level. 

    Access to culture was a core part of the United Kingdom, and each part of the country had an Arts Council.  Much of the cultural offerings in the United Kingdom were free of charge, including entry to museums and free music tuition for children. 

    The Addressing Bullying in Schools Act in Northern Ireland commenced in 2021.  It put onus on schools to address the motivations of bullying and put policies in place at the school level.  Three new language authorities would be established with preparations at an advanced stage. 

    The Scottish Government published a cultural strategy in 2020 and a refreshed action plan to support delivery in 2023, responding to recent challenges including COVID-19 and the cost of living.  The Government had allocated more than 50 million pounds to cultural funding, which was an historic increase. 

    Wales had invested two million pounds in literacy programmes and 1.6 million pounds for science, technology, engineering and mathematics in schools.  In Wales, around 67 per cent of students attending mainstream schools could access a free school meal at lunchtime.  Tackling the impact of poverty in education was a priority. New guidance was published to help schools support Gypsy, Roma and Traveller students.  The school curriculum had been developed to be inclusive for all learners, with diversity as a cross-cutting theme.  Cardiff had been secured as the host of the Euro Games in 2027, which was a key event for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex persons. 

    Post COVID, the Government had established the Oak Academy, which had a specific focus on closing attainment gaps.  Teachers had reported positive outcomes when using Oak resources.  Local authorities were required to provide sufficient school places for the area.  No child could be denied schooling based on their ethnicity.  There was an active Gypsy and Roma stakeholder group which aimed to ensure that the barriers these young people faced were addressed. 

    Education Scotland had rolled out several programmes, including to address gender stereotypes, unconscious bias, and domestic abuse.  Numerous provisions had been put in place in Jersey to ensure equal education access for children from disadvantaged backgrounds. 

    Sport England had a 10-year plan to increase the participation of sport for persons with disabilities.  The overall investment figure into disability focused access was around 30 million pounds per year.  There had been 6.7 million pounds of investment directly to national disability sport organizations.  As a direct result of such investment, the United Kingdom took second place in the medal tally of the Paralympics last summer, which would inspire more people with disabilities to participate in sport. 

    Questions by Committee Experts

    JOO-YOUNG LEE, Committee Expert and Taskforce Member, asked what measures were in place to ensure children of pre-school age had access to affordable, quality childhood education?  The State party continued to treat social security as an instrument for getting people to work.  It was highly likely that if this approach continued, the State party would fail to address poverty.  Social security must be used to achieve an adequate standard of living for all people. 

    A Committee Expert asked to what extent corporal punishment at school was prohibited and sanctioned?  Was any form of corporal punishment against children treated as a criminal offence? What measures were being taken to implement anti-bullying plans? 

    JULIETA ROSSI, Committee Expert and Taskforce Member, asked how the State party was addressing the issue of stateless persons, particularly when it came to access to education and family reunification? 

    SEREE NONTHASOOT, Committee Expert and Taskforce Leader, said there were more than 80,000 children in foster care across the United Kingdom.  What was being done to close the attainment gaps in education for these children?  How was bullying prevented against lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex students? 

    Responses by the Delegation

    The delegation said it was not correct that the Government considered social security just as a route to work.  Children’s early years were crucial to their development, health and life chances, and the Government aimed to set every child up to have the best start in life. 

    The Home Office Stateless Policy was designed to assist those who were not recognised as a citizen of any country.  This provided a means for stateless persons in the United Kingdom to access their basic human rights. 

    All forms of physical punishment of children were against the law in Scotland in all settings. An Act was passed in 2019 which removed the defence of “reasonable chastisement” to the existing offence of assault. 

    Closing Remarks

    SEREE NONTHASOOT, Committee Expert and Taskforce Leader, extended appreciation to the United Kingdom delegation for its superb time and sequence management, which allowed the Committee to raise all relevant questions.  The State party should implement robust legislative programmes and ensure people were confident that they would be protected at the international level.  The Committee implored the United Kingdom to ensure that all Crown Dependencies and Overseas Territories under its control provided the highest standard of human rights to everyone.  Mr. Nonthasoot thanked all those who had made the dialogue possible. 

    ROBERT LINHAM, Deputy Director, Rights Policy, Ministry of Justice of the United Kingdom and head of the delegation, said the dialogue had been rich and detailed, covering a variety of issues.  It was hoped that the Committee could see the efforts being undertaken in the whole of the United Kingdom to improve economic, social and cultural rights. The United Kingdom was a great supporter in the work of the treaty bodies and it was hoped this was evident through the dialogue.  Mr. Linham thanked everyone who had supported the dialogue. 

     

     

    Produced by the United Nations Information Service in Geneva for use of the media; 
    not an official record. English and French versions of our releases are different as they are the product of two separate coverage teams that work independently.

     

     

    CESCR25.004E

    MIL OSI United Nations News

  • MIL-OSI Security: Dominican National Pleads Guilty to Fentanyl Trafficking

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    BOSTON – A Dominican national unlawfully present in the United States has pleaded guilty to trafficking thousands of fentanyl pills.

    Freddy Artemio Guerrero Soto, 29, pleaded guilty to conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute 400 grams or more of fentanyl and possession with intent to distribute 400 grams or more of fentanyl. U.S. District Court Judge Indira Talwani scheduled sentencing for May 12, 2025. In September 2024, Guerrero Soto was charged along with three co-conspirators.

    According to court documents, in September 2024, an undercover agent ordered 30,000 blue pressed fentanyl pills and 500 grams of powder fentanyl from Ernesto Andujar Echavarria, who allegedly agreed to provide the pills and powder the next day. It is further alleged that shortly before the sale was to occur, Andujar Echavarria informed the undercover agent that an associate of his would deliver the drugs. A short time later, it is alleged that Guerrero Soto met with the undercover agent and provided him with a backpack containing a shoe box with a large number of blue pills and bags of brown powder. Guerrero Soto was arrested and during a search of his person, he was found to be in possession of a Dominican identification card. Together, the blue pressed pills and bags of brown powder seized from Guerrero Soto contained over 2 kilograms of fentanyl.

    Andujar Echavarria has pleaded not guilty and is awaiting trial.

    The charge of conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute 400 grams or more of fentanyl and possession with intent to distribute 400 grams or more of fentanyl carry mandatory minimum sentences of 10 years to life in prison; no less than five years of supervised release; and a fine of up to $10 million. The defendant is subject to deportation proceedings upon completion of an imposed sentence. Sentences are imposed by a federal district court judge based upon the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and other statutory factors.

    United States Attorney Leah B. Foley and Stephen Belleau, Acting Special Agent in Charge of the Drug Enforcement Administration, New England Field Division made the announcement. Assistant U.S. Attorney Christopher Pohl of the Narcotics and Money Laundering Unit is prosecuting the case.

    The remaining defendants are presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court 

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Remarks made by Technology Secretary Peter Kyle at the Munich Security Conference

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Technology Secretary Peter Kyle spoke about the the UK’s approach to the responsible development of artificial intelligence at the Munich Security Conference.

    Innovation is defined by its ability to surprise.

    Only a few years ago, GPT-2 meant nothing to the public.

    For many of us, AI felt like a distant possibility at best.

    Something that would never – could never – live up to the hype.

    And yet, overnight, ChatGPT became a household name.

    It unleashed an unprecedented wave of technological change. 

    And the pace of progress shows no signs of slowing down.

    With DeepSeek, we’ve just seen once again just how sudden, how unpredictable, innovation can be.

    The AI revolution is happening.

    Ignoring it is simply not an option.

    In the UK, we reject the doomsayers and the pessimists.

    Because we are optimistic about the extraordinary potential of this technology.

    And hopeful for the radical, far-reaching change it will bring.

    We launched the AI Opportunities Action Plan to put us on the front foot.

    Working in collaboration with our international partners, we’re going to create one of the biggest clusters of AI innovation in the world and deliver a new era of prosperity and wealth creation for our country.

    This is a once-in-a-generation opportunity.

    If we can seize it, we will close the door on a decade of slow growth and stagnant productivity.

    Of taxes that are just too high.

    We will deliver new jobs that put more money in working people’s pockets.

    And we will drive forward a digital revolution inside government to make our state smaller, smarter, and more efficient.

    But none of that is possible unless we can mitigate its risks that AI presents.

    After all, businesses will only use these technologies if they can trust them.

    Security and innovation go hand in hand.

    AI is a powerful tool and powerful tools can be misused.

    State-sponsored hackers are using AI to write malicious code and identify system vulnerabilities, increasing the sophistication and efficiency of their attacks.

    Criminals are using AI deepfakes to assist in fraud, breaching security by impersonating officials.

    Last year, attackers used live deepfake technology during a video call to mimic bank officials.  

    They stole $25 million. 

    And now we are seeing instances of people using AI to assist them in planning violent and harmful acts.

    These aren’t distant possibilities.

    They are real, tangible harms, happening right now.

    The implications for our people could be pervasive and profound.

    In the UK, we have built the largest team in a government dedicated to understanding AI capabilities and risks in the world.

    That work is rooted in the strength of our partnerships with the companies who are right at the frontier of AI.

    Working with those companies, the government can conduct scientifically informed tests to understand new AI capabilities and the risks they pose.

    Make no mistake, I’m talking about risks to our people, their way of life, and the sovereignty and stability which underpins it.

    That is why today, I am renaming our AI Safety Institute as the AI Security Institute.

    This change brings us into line with what most people would expect an Institute like this to be doing.

    They are not looking into freedom of speech.

    They are not deciding what counts as bias or discrimination.

    They are not politicians – nor should they be.

    They are scientists – scientists who are squarely focused on rigorous research into the most serious emerging risks.

    They are researching AI’s potential to assist with the development of chemical and biological weapons.

    They are building on the expertise of our National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) to understand how this technology could be used to help malicious actors commit cyber-attacks.

    They want to understand how AI could undermine human control.

    Our research shows that those risks are clear:

    There has been a clear upward trend in AI system capabilities most relevant to national security in the past 18 months.

    • For the first time last year, AI models demonstrated PhD-level performance on chemistry and biology question sets.

    • The safeguards designed to prevent these models doing harm are not currently sufficient.

    • Every model tested by the Institute is vulnerable to safeguard evasion attacks. 

    • And it is almost certain that these capabilities will continue to improve, while novel risks will emerge from systems acting as autonomous agents to complete tasks with only limited human instruction. 

    The more we understand these risks, the better we can work with companies to address them.

    And the faster we can keep our nation safe, the faster our people can embrace the potential of AI to create wealth and improve their lives.

    There are certain security risks which require immediate action.

    That is why the Security Institute will collaborate with the Defence Science and Technology Laboratory, the Ministry of Defence’s science and technology organisation, to assess the dual-use scientific capabilities of frontier AI.

    Today, we are also launching a criminal misuse team in the Security Institute, who will partner directly with the Home Office to conduct research on a range of crime and security issues which threaten to harm our citizens.

    Earlier this month, the UK set out plans to make it illegal to own AI tools optimised to make images of child sexual abuse.

    Reports of AI-generated child sexual abuse material found online by the Internet Watch Foundation have quadrupled in a single year.

    The Security Institute will work with the Home Office to explore what more we can do to prevent abusers using AI to commit their sickening crimes.

    A security risk is a security risk, no matter where it comes from.

    US companies have shown the lead in taking security risks seriously.

    But we need to scrutinise all models regardless of their jurisdiction of origin.

    So I’ve instructed the Security Institute to take a leading role in testing AI models wherever they come from, open or closed.

    While we can’t discuss these results publicly, we will share them with our allies.

    We are alive to the security risks of today.

    But we need to focus on tomorrow, too, and the day after that.

    We are now seeing the glimmers of AI agents that can act autonomously, of their own accord.

    The 2025 International AI Safety Report, led by Yoshua Bengio, warns us that – without the checks and balances of people directing them – we must consider the possibility that risks won’t just come from malicious actors misusing AI models, but from the models themselves.

    We don’t yet know the full extent of these risks.

    However, as we deploy AI across our economy, our society, and the critical infrastructure that keeps our nation secure, we cannot afford to ignore them.

    Because losing oversight and control of advanced AI systems, particularly Artificial General Intelligence (AGI), would be catastrophic.

    It must be avoided at all costs.

    I want to be clear exactly what this testing is, and what it’s not.

    It’s not a barrier to market access. Not a blocker to innovation.

    It is urgent scientific work to understand serious risks to our country.

    Governments are not passive bystanders in the AI revolution.

    We have agency in how AI shapes our society.

    And we have a responsibility to use that agency to defend our democratic way of life.

    Only countries with a deep and knowing understanding of this technology will be able to build the capacity they need to deliver for their citizens in the twenty-first century.

    But success is not a given.

    It depends on the democratic world rallying together to maintain our leadership in AI.

    Together, we can protect our fundamental values – freedom, openness, and opportunity.

    If we do that, we won’t just keep our people safe.

    We will ensure that they are first to benefit from the new era of wealth and prosperity which AI will bring.

    Updates to this page

    Published 14 February 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Works on paper by women artists go on display at Art Gallery

    Source: Scotland – City of Aberdeen

    A selection of works on paper by 12 contemporary women artists has gone on display at Aberdeen Art Gallery. 
     
    Works on paper can include drawings and watercolours, printed material and art photography. There are over 13,000 works on paper in the Aberdeen Archives, Gallery & Museums collection. The new display in Gallery 16 will be refreshed over the coming years to highlight the full range and richness of the collection. One of the priorities for the redevelopment of the Art Gallery, completed in 2019, was for more of the collection to go on display, including works on paper. 
     
    Around half of the contemporary artworks in the collection are by women artists. The work of the 12 artists featured in the new exhibition spans 50 years and explores a variety of techniques including printmaking, photography and painting. The artists are Annie Cattrell, Mirian Dokotliver, Amy Gear, Louise Hopkins, Hannah Imlach, Bet Low, Bel McCoig, Nanny Mulder, Elizabeth Ogilvie, Frances Walker, Caroline Walker and Francesca Woodman. 
     
    Among the highlights of the display are four photographs by the American photographer Francesca Woodman (1958-1981) who produced a highly-influential body of work during her brief 10-year career, often photographing herself in empty interiors. Her blurry images give a sense of human fragility.  
     
    A set of prints, which is a recent addition to the collection, is on display for the first time. ‘Nocturnes’ by Scottish artist Caroline Walker (born Dunfermline, 1982) depicts women in a variety of domestic settings at nighttime. 
     

    Frances Walker (born Kirkcaldy, 1930) has been a major contributor to artistic practice and development in Aberdeen, having taught at Gray’s School of Art in Aberdeen for many years. In 1974 she was a founding member of the city’s Peacock Printmakers. Walker depicts wild and desolate landscapes and terrains in her paintings and prints. 
     

    Gallery 16 at Aberdeen Art Gallery, where this new display is on show, is one of 19 spaces in the building that showcase the outstanding collection that is cared for by the Archives, Gallery & Museums team on behalf of the people of Aberdeen. Each Gallery has a different atmosphere and a different story to tell, from Art Deco ceramics, to portraiture, jewellery, processes in art and craft, the influence of 19th century French art on Scottish artists, the artist-adventurer James McBey and the experience of Aberdonians during times of war and conflict. Visitors can discover more about the collection by listening to staff talking about some of the highlights of the displays by downloading the free digital guide to the Art Gallery on the Bloomberg Connects app. 
     

    Councillor Martin Greig, Aberdeen City Council’s culture spokesman, said: “This is a wonderful exhibition of works on paper by women artists. It’s great to see the skills and talent on display. These changing exhibitions give everyone the chance to enjoy different aspects of the Art Gallery collection. These are treasures which belong to all of us in the city and it is good to have the opportunity to view these carefully-chosen artworks. The free digital guide to the Gallery on the Bloomberg Connects app is a really useful way to find out more about the drawings, paintings and other items in the city’s excellent art museum. The app is a good way to familiarise yourself with and learn more about Aberdeen’s outstanding collection.”  
     
    Visit the collections pages of our website to browse a selection of works on paper by women artists at  Works on Paper – Women Artists Selection – Collections – eMuseum  
     
     
    Works on Paper – Women Artists is now open at Aberdeen Art Gallery, Schoolhill, Aberdeen AB10 1FQ. Open Monday – Saturday 10am-5pm, Sunday 11am-4pm. 
    Admission is free and donations are welcome. 
     
    The special exhibition Artist Textiles: From Picasso to Warhol continues at the Art Gallery until 13 April. This joyful exhibition explores textiles and fashion as popular artforms in 20th century Britain, Europe and the United States through rare examples of textiles by leading artists including Alexander Calder, Salvador Dalí, Sonia Delaunay, Raoul Dufy, Barbara Hepworth, Fernand Léger, Henri Matisse, Joan Miró, Henry Moore, Pablo Picasso, Ben Nicholson and Andy Warhol. 
    For ticket and visiting information go to www.aagm.co.uk 

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: JD Vance accused of spreading shameless misinformation about buffer zones

    Source: Scottish Greens

    Abortion rights are human rights.

    US Vice President JD Vance has been accused of spreading shocking and shameless misinformation about safe access zones in Scotland by Scottish Green MSP Gillian Mackay.

    In a speech this morning, VP Vance claimed that people in Scotland were told that private prayer in their own homes would be against the law within a safe access zone and that people were encouraged to report anyone they thought guilty of “thought crime.” This has never been true.

    Ms Mackay introduced the bill that secured 200 metre wide safe access zones, or buffer zones, around abortion service providers to stop the intimidating anti-choice protests that were taking place across Scotland. Private prayer at home has never been impacted by this Act.

    Ms Mackay said:

    “This is shocking and shameless misinformation from VP Vance, who is either very badly informed about what my Act has done or he is knowingly misrepresenting it. 

    “He is one of the most powerful people in the world but he is peddling total nonsense and dangerous scare mongering.

    “Nobody should be intimidated or harassed when accessing healthcare, and I am proud that my Act has put a stop to the graphic banners and the protests that far too many people were being forced to pass in order to access healthcare.

    “I was proud that our Parliament voted to back safe access zones so overwhelmingly, and that they stood against the cynical lies and misrepresentation of the kind that Mr Vance is promoting.”

    Ms Mackay added:

    “The government that Mr Vance represents is a clear threat to reproductive rights. He has a shocking record on abortion and many other issues. He has supported calls to reduce access to healthcare and has even argued for a national ban on abortion rights across the US.

    “Abortion rights are human rights and they are healthcare. Today and every day I will stand with the millions of people across the US who oppose the misogynistic and anti-choice agenda of Donald Trump and JD Vance.”

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Enter our competition to be Ambassador for a Day in Armenia 2025

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    The British Embassy in Yerevan invites female citizens in Armenia aged 18 to 22 to enter a competition to be an Ambassador for a Day.

    Call for applications for the Ambassador for a Day in Armenia 2025 announced by the British Embassy in Yerevan

    What is Ambassador for A Day

    Have you ever wondered what it’s like to represent your country on the international stage? The Diplomacy plays a key role in shaping global decisions and women’s voices are truly crucial in this field. This competition gives you a rare chance to step into the shoes of an Ambassador for a day, learn about diplomacy in action and the work of the British Embassy team.

    Why you should enter this competition

    Women and girls represent half of the world’s population and, therefore, half of its potential. Yet they are not fully represented in diplomacy, politics and leadership roles.

    This is why we are encouraging women to make their voices heard on topics that affect us all. We encourage young students to become leaders and advocates for change by offering them an opportunity to experience diplomacy in action and to Take a glimpse behind the scenes of the British Embassy in Yerevan.

    Who can apply?

    You can enter this competition if you:

    • are a female citizen of Armenia
    • are aged between 18 to 22 years old
    • have a good command of English
    • agree to be
    • available to spend a full day with the British Embassy staff on 20 March 2025
    • agree to be photographed and filmed throughout the day, with content shared across publicly (in accordance with GDPR guidelines)

    How to apply?

    To enter, submit a short video (up to 2 minutes) in English answering the following question: “What would you do if you were the British Ambassador in Armenia?”

    Important tips:

    • we will be celebrating Women’s month together and this competition highlights the importance of women’s leadership. Please bear in mind that the topic for International Women’s Day 2024 is “Accelerate Action (IWD 2025) and “For ALL women and girls: Rights. Equality. Empowerment (UN Women 2025)
    • creativity will be an important judging criteria. Don’t be afraid to be bold and share your unique perspective.
    • the selection process will be fair and inclusive with a diverse judging panel to ensure equal evaluation

    Please read the information in detail on our Terms and Conditions.

    How to submit your entry?

    Read the terms and conditions for entering the Ambassador for a Day 2025 competition:

    Terms and Conditions for entering the Ambassador for A Day 2025 Competition: Terms and Conditions for entering the Ambassador for A Day 2025 Competition (ODT, 12.1 KB).

    Once you have prepared your video, email it along with the Ambassador for A Day participation form to Enquiries.Yerevan@fcdo.gov.uk before the end of 3 March 2025.

    Key dates to remember

    Mark your calendar!

    • applications open: 14 February 2025
    • deadline for applications: 3 March 2025
    • shortlisted winner contacted: 14 March 2025
    • ambassador for a Day: 19 March 2025

    …and for the winner

    The winner will spend an entire day shadowing the British Ambassador. This will include attending meetings, learning about international cooperation and engaging with UK-funded projects.

    Follow the journey!

    Even if you are not selected as the winner, we encourage you to follow the journey on our social media channels. We will be sharing inspirational stories and insights from past winners. This is a chance to engage with a community of young women interested in leadership and diplomacy.

    Updates to this page

    Published 14 February 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Fun is on the cards this half term as Council sets out free programme of activities

    Source: City of Manchester

    This half term a huge range of free activities are set to take place for children to enjoy over their break.

    From sports and physical activities to arts and crafts and day trips there is a wider variety of activities on offer to keep the kids entertained and engaged organised via the City Council.

    These free events are open to all families whose children are eligible for free school meals. The activities are free, and a nutritious meal will also be provided over the course of the day.

    Getting involved is as easy as clicking a link and booking a place for your child – just follow this link to get a head start on a fun half term.

    Addressing hunger over the holiday is a priority for Manchester City Council and around 44,000 children and young people are being supported through payments via Manchester schools. And a further £190,000 has been allocated to the city’s Holiday Activity Fund (HAF) to provide free activities during half term breaks.

    The holiday offer will run from Monday February 17 to Friday February 21, with more information available here.

    You can also find out about even more activities that are taking place over the half term, from fun events at the People’s History Museum, to free swimming sessions to nature walks all of which are open to everyone!

    Visit our Loads to Do page to learn how you can have fun this half term.

    Councillor Julie Reid, Executive Member for Early Years, Children and Young People said: “Supporting families over the half term period is a really important role that we play as a Council. A huge amount of work has taken place, particularly since the pandemic, to address inequalities across the city and schemes like the Holiday Activities Fund is a big part of that. Holiday hunger can have a real impact on children which is why schemes like this are so vitally important.

    “There are a lot of great events that will be running over the half term with a free meal or snack included, so if you have not already been contacted to take part I’d urge families to have a look at our Loads to Do website and see what they think their child would enjoy over the half term.”

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: expert reaction to asteroid 2024 YR4 currently predicted to have a small chance of hitting the Earth in 2032

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Scientists comment on asteroid 2024 YR4 which may hit Earth in 2032. 

    Prof Martin Ward, Emeritus Temple Chevallier Professor of Astronomy, Durham University, said:

    “The way these percentages for the chance of impact are calculated are based on extrapolations of the asteroid trajectory and the position of the Earth when the asteroid arrives. They get more accurate with time as we get more data. Think of it as a circle in the sky (much bigger than the asteroid itself). The direction of future travel plus the position of the Earth could take any line out of the circle towards the Earth. Most lines are projected to miss, but a few would hit.  As our data on the asteroid trajectory and Earth’s position when it arrives get better by tracking it with time the circle becomes smaller, and the number of possible future lines decreases. If the lines that previously hit the Earth are now outside the improved circle, then the chances go down (and maybe vanish). But if the smaller circle still includes the lines that hit the Earth, then the chances of hitting us go up correspondingly. So, as time goes on we will get either good news, that eventually the future direction of travel misses us, or bad news, that the ratio of lines that hit us to those that miss us, goes up. If that trend continues, then duck…   Before that happens, it will be possible to predict the path it would take through the atmosphere, and hope for the best. The Earth is 70% covered by water, and of the remaining land mass, 33% is desert. So the question will be…  “do you feel lucky?”

     

    Prof Danny Steeghs, Professor and Head if Astronomy & Astrophysics Group, Department of Physics, University of Warwick, said:

    What is the situation?

    “We monitor many asteroid orbits, but this object was not previously known. It was identified in December 2024, near its closest approach, when it was bright and moving through the sky fast. Routine is to model the orbit of newly discovered asteroids including projecting forwards in time to see if there are any concerns around close approaches with the Earth. Almost always the answer is no. In this case we could not, and still cannot, fully rule that out. This is rare, it has been many years since we have had an asteroid with this level of impact probability.”

     

    How strong is the science behind a potential earth impact?

    “We understand the dynamics of solar system orbits well. It’s about measuring the orbit with better precision and characterising the nature/size of the object. The Earth is a small target on the scale of the solar system, but orbit calculations have a finite precision since they are based on measurements of the position of the asteroid at different times since its discovery. These measurements have a finite precision, and we do not have many yet, and we can accurately translate this into a probability of impact during future passes. At the moment this is a few 2%, which is considered high enough to warrant further and urgent observations.”

     

    How worrying/expected is this?

    “It is not really worrying, expectations are that as we refine the orbit of the asteroid, the probability of impact will reduce. Its better maybe to think of it as, we cannot fully rule out that it may impact, rather than expecting it to impact. The next steps are clear – securing more data and improving our precision/confidence.”

     

    How is the risk of collision calculated, and could it change?

    “The measurements that feed into these calculations are collected by a number of telescopes and observatories. These are globally shared so that a number of teams can calculate orbit projections. Each time new data is added, the calculations can be refined. This is why the number is changing and in the early stages it can change more erratically. As precision improves, it will tend to settle down to the point where we can be very confident. This could take some time, as the asteroid is getting faint quickly, and it may not be fully settled until it passes again in 2028.”

     

    What could we do to stop it / prepare?

    “We do not yet accurately know the size of the object, and what any impact might do and how we could mitigate it depends on that. We have tested deflecting an asteroid by sending a probe to hit it from the right angle, just to change its orbit a little. That is the preferred intervention route, but what is involved depends on the mass, size and orbit.”

     

    Dr Darren Baskill, Physics & Astronomy Lecturer, University of Sussex, said:

    “An asteroid passes by the Earth, within the orbit of the Moon, typically every month – which is very close in cosmic terms.  The last time this happened was when a 26m asteroid passed us by on the 4th of February 2025.

    “Watching an asteroid approach is a bit like watching a long pot in snooker – you don’t know if the ball will go in a pocket until the very last moment, and there is always a good chance of the ball rattling in the jaws of the pocket and missing.  This is why there is so much uncertainty surrounding this asteroid.  Of course, the distances involved in astronomy are much, much larger, making accurate long-term predictions difficult. 

    “It is worth noting that the predicted size of asteroid 2024 YR4 is 40-70m, which is only around 3 times larger than the asteroid that famously struck Russia in 2013.  While there were large amounts of minor damage in that event, including large numbers of windows being blown out in the area due to the resulting shockwave, there were no fatalities, nor any major damage recorded.

    “At the moment, while there are teams around the world who are able to detect asteroid threats better than ever before, there are no systems in place that could prevent an asteroid strike should one be found to be on a collision course.  Hopefully, that will change over the next 7-and-a-half years, just in case!”

    Dr James O’Donoghue, planetary scientist at the University of Reading, said:

    “Scientists are getting better at tracking the asteroids that could hit Earth, with the result that we have become accustomed to asteroids having incredibly low impact probabilities, typically in the order of one in tens of thousands. That’s why a 1-in-49 chance is making us sit up and notice.

    “This level of risk demands serious attention, and it’s clear that it is being taken seriously, as seen by NASA’s response and the high-level notifications that have been triggered. The recent diversion of the James Webb Space Telescope to observe this object is particularly noteworthy. Understanding its precise size is crucial – an 80-meter asteroid would impact with eight times more energy than a 40-meter one, as doubling the diameter increases the volume and mass by a factor of eight. To put this in perspective, a 40-meter asteroid carries the energy of a few megatons of TNT, comparable to a nuclear warhead, while a 90-meter asteroid exceeds 50 megatons – roughly equivalent to the Tsar Bomba, the most powerful nuclear device ever detonated.

    “The fact that we can predict this potential impact many years in advance is a testament to how well humanity is advancing in planetary defence through astronomy. It’s also a reminder than we have discovered less than half the total number of similarly sized asteroids so far, so there is much more work to be done.”

    Dr Olivier R. Hainaut, Astronomer, European Southern Observatory, said:

    What is the situation?

    “Observatories around the world (including ESO) are working to refine the orbit. This takes time, as one has to wait for the asteroid to move to perform more measurements. We can fairly easily observe YR4 for another month with large telescopes, then it will become harder and harder. By early April it will be out of reach of most telescopes. Hopefully the orbit will be refined enough to completely rule out an impact.

    How is the risk of collision calculated and could it change?

    “Orbital calculation and celestial mechanics… You measure the position of the asteroid in front of the background stars over as many nights as possible, then solve for the orbit, which is the 3D trajectory of the asteroid in space. The longer you can measure, the better you know the orbit. Currently, we could observe YR4 for a little less than 2 months over its 4y orbit, so we need to extrapolate a lot, hence the large uncertainty. As we will observe more, the orbit will be refined, and we will know better where the asteroid will be in 2032. Eventually, the probability of impact will converge towards one of two possible values: 0% or 100%… Hopefully 0%, and hopefully by the end of this visibility period. Note that the probability is likely to go up even if it ends up going down to 0% -that’s normal.”

    “Measuring and computing the orbit is very robust- celestial mechanics is very well known, and demonstrated by the navigation of spacecrafts all around the solar system.

    “Measuring the size and composition of the asteroid is not scientifically complicated, but is tricky in this case because the object is very faint.”

    How worrying/expected is this?

    “How worrying: currently, the probability of impact is ~2%. It is typical to start preparing for disaster relief when the probability goes above 1% (astronomers did not make that number up – it is what is customarily used for all kind of disasters). IF the probability stays above 1% at the end of the visibility period (~April), it will be time to start possible mitigation space mission. Keep in mind that IF these mission would fail and IF the asteroid does impact, it is not a large one. Possibly a few times larger than the one that blasted above Chelyabinsk in 2013, but ~150x SMALLER than the Chicxulub dinosaur killer.

    “How expected: look at the Moon. It is covered with craters, and the Earth is just next to it. Collisions with asteroids are expected, which is why we try to discover as many as possible (and all the “large” ones). The question is not “if”, but “when” and “how big”.”

    What could we do to stop it / prepare?

    “Short answer: first, refine the orbit to determine whether it will hit or not. If it will, then nudge it to slightly change its orbit so that it misses the Earth. The sooner the better, as a later nudge will need to be larger. To nudge it, refer eg to the DART mission, which did it as a test on an asteroid about 2x the size of YR4.

    “DON’T break the asteroid (refer to a series of bad SciFi movies): you would end up with many fragments to deal with.”

    Declared interests

    For all experts, no reply to our request for DOIs was received.

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI Global: Bridget Jones: Mad About the Boy – our favourite frazzled English woman is back but life’s more complicated

    Source: The Conversation – UK – By Mary Harrod, Professor of French and Screen Studies, University of Warwick

    Bridget Jones, the endearingly chaotic heroine who is unlucky in love, is back – but not as many might expect. This is the fourth Bridget Jones film, which adapts the story of the third book in Helen Fielding’s much-loved series (the third film, Bridget Jones’s Baby, was based on the fourth book).

    When Bridget Jones’s Diary came out in 2001, our heroine’s low-level eating disorder, neediness and alcohol abuse associated female singlehood with mental instability. In this new instalment, we see an older Bridget with more mature concerns.

    The woman we meet in the long opening pre-credit sequence of Mad About The Boy is frazzled, manic and, as we’ve seen Bridget before, given to long bouts on the sofa communing with a bottle of white wine. However, this time she’s not down because love eludes her but because she had a wonderful love and lost it. Our once bubbly singleton has been reconfigured as a subdued widow with two young kids.

    Mad About the Boy starts several years after the death of Bridget’s husband Mark Darcy (Colin Firth). While echoes of melancholy endure throughout, once in its stride the film does reestablish the reassuringly comical coordinates of the Jones-verse. At its best, it offers the brilliant one-liners and set pieces to be expected from its star writing team – including Dan Mazer (Ali G, Borat) and Abi Morgan (Shame, The Iron Lady) as well as Fielding herself – served up with a good dose of Bridget Jones’s signature slapstick.


    Looking for something good? Cut through the noise with a carefully curated selection of the latest releases, live events and exhibitions, straight to your inbox every fortnight, on Fridays. Sign up here.


    Embracing the usual trappings of popular feminism, Mad About the Boy champions body positivity and romantic optimism for middle-aged women. It is the latest in a growing genre of story that affords older female characters active sexual identities, including by pairing them up with younger partners. Think of the Sex and the City reboot And Just Like That, the Nicole Kidman corporate kink romance Babygirl or the romcom Good Luck Leo Grande (starring Emma Thompson, who plays a wry gynaecologist in Mad About the Boy).

    The most interesting consideration in updating the Jones franchise for the 21st century comes from its interrogation of internet dating practices: a classic source of humour in stories about Generation X rejoining the dating game. This is most memorably mined in the novel and series Fleishman is in Trouble. Watching the trailer you might expect Mad about the Boy to centralise Tinder. But this proves a bluff.

    Bridget Jones: Mad About The Boy trailer.

    The app leads to the relationship between Bridget and the film’s eponymous “boy”, Roxster, which is initiated in emphatically physical terms when he rescues her from a tree. This scene was full of nods to the famous shot of her backside sliding down a fireman’s pole in the original film. While the connection is consolidated over a dating app, this relationship quickly regains IRL contours as they engage in passionate sex.

    In a self-aware gesture towards the franchise’s debt to Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice, Bridget brings up the findings of sociological research on dating apps while talking to her friends about why she’s not met anyone IRL yet. Apps, such as Tinder, provide the illusion of a dating life without ever having to engage in the messy business of actually meeting someone, let alone having sex Bridget argues. She backs this up with the research that suggest this removal of intimacy during the courting stage is not dissimilar to the marriage mart in Austen’s Regency England where young, eligible women were essentially “on display” for men.

    At the end of the day, Roxster ghosts Bridget and she is left anxiously checking her phone, drinking alone again and obsessing. This, however, is the old Bridget Jones. Even though the boy does eventually come back, Bridget ends up taking the advice from one of her perennially supportive friends to “let him disintegrate into nothingness”. Symbolically rejecting the flakiness that comes with digitising human relationships, Bridget mirrors society’s increasing disenchantment with dating apps.

    The idea of spending time on concrete and lasting relationships underpins Daniel Cleaver’s (Hugh Grant) narrative arc too. With no “kin” he can draw on to put down as an emergency contact, his close friendship with Bridget ends up counting all the more.

    At the heart of this film is a strong validation of real connection, understood in terms of corporeality, dependability and also emotional intelligence that cannot be reproduced by dating apps and their algorithms. Likewise, it considers the broader climate of romantic and social crisis in today’s culture, as birth rates plummet and more people live alone and suffer from loneliness. Friendship and family, whether blood or chosen, are just as important here as romance.

    Zellweger is effervescent and Hugh Grant gives a show-stealing performance as devilish Lothario-with-a-heart Cleaver. It’s great to see old Bridge back and not so mad after all.

    Mary Harrod does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. Bridget Jones: Mad About the Boy – our favourite frazzled English woman is back but life’s more complicated – https://theconversation.com/bridget-jones-mad-about-the-boy-our-favourite-frazzled-english-woman-is-back-but-lifes-more-complicated-249807

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: North East man jailed for running illegal waste site

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    A County Durham man has been jailed for operating an illegal waste site in a prosecution brought by the Environment Agency.

    Image shows waste on the site in Rowlands Gill.

    Christopher Williams, 66, of Acton Dene in Stanley, appeared at Newton Aycliffe magistrates’ court on Thursday 13 February for sentencing.

    He had previously pleaded guilty to two charges of operating a waste site without an environmental permit at Whinfield Industrial Estate in Rowlands Gill, Gateshead.

    He was sentenced to 44 weeks in prison, comprising 26 weeks and a further 18 weeks because the conviction placed him in breach of a suspended sentence imposed for previous environmental offences.

    Waste posed ‘obvious’ fire risk

    Gary Wallace, area environment manager for the Environment Agency in the North East, said:

    Not only was the waste on site illegal, but there was a very obvious fire-risk. Williams was given ample opportunity to clear the waste and was advised how he could operate within the law.

    But instead he continued to breach the law with no consideration for the environment or community.

    Environmental permits are in place to protect the public and environment, and I hope this sentence sends out the message to others that we will take action against those involved in illegal waste activity.

    Image shows mixed waste stored inside one of the sheds at the site in Rowlands Gill.

    The court heard that Williams runs an organisation called the LCA Community Charity, which is not a registered charity, from an industrial unit at the site. It advertises as offering help with clothing, furniture and household donations.

    The organisation and the defendant both hold waste carrier licences, which is a legal requirement to be able to transport waste.

    EA officers saw large amount of waste at site

    On 17 November 2022, Environment Agency officers attended the unit. Outside, they saw a large amount of household waste, including more than 50 fridges and fridge freezers, dismantled furniture, mattresses, sink units and toilet bowls, baths and doors, amongst other general waste.

    Most of the waste was mixed together, with some looking like it had been there for a long time. Inside the unit was an office area with some household items for sale.

    Inside one of the two sheds on site, waste was piled 12 feet high. Across the site, the illegally stored waste posed a fire-risk, with no separation between piles, meaning if a fire broke out it would spread quickly.

    Officers spoke to Williams, and he was requested to remove the waste by 16 January 2023, and in a follow-up letter, he was advised about waste exemptions, which allows for low level waste activity without the need for a permit that could allow him to sort recyclable waste for recovery and operate within the law.

    On 17 January, officers returned, only to find there was more waste present, with a noticeable increase in broken wooden furniture. Officers expressed concerns about the fire risk.

    In the following months, through March and into the summer, Environment Agency officers made numerous visits where they saw waste still on site. At one point, Williams said half of the fridges had ‘gone to Africa.’

    Fridges contain refrigerant gasses and blown foam insulation, with old fridges classed as hazardous waste, and should be disposed of at an suitably-licensed facility.

    He also told officers he had no waste transfer notes, which are a legal requirement to trace the movement of waste between one place and another.

    Officers explained to Williams that the deadline for clearing the site passed in January 2023.

    During a visit in September 2024, officers inspected the site and found it was still operating as an illegal waste facility. Williams claimed to still be busy clearing the site.

    Illegal waste activity can be reported to the Environment Agency on 0800 807060.

    Background

    Christopher Williams’ previous court case where the suspended prison sentence was imposed

    Full charges

    Between 16 November 2022 and 12 July 2023 at unit 13, Whinfield Industrial Estate, Rowlands Gill, Williams operated a regulated facility, namely a waste operation for the storage and treatment of waste pending recovery or disposal, otherwise than in accordance with an environmental permit

    Contrary to regulations 12(1)(a) and 38(1) Environmental Permitting (England & Wales) Regulations 2016.

    On 24 September 2024 at unit 13, Whinfield Industrial Estate, Rowlands Gill, you operated a regulated facility, namely a waste operation for the storage and treatment of waste pending recovery or disposal, otherwise than in accordance with an environmental permit.

    Contrary to regulations 12(1)(a) and 38(1) Environmental Permitting (England & Wales) Regulations 2016.

    Updates to this page

    Published 14 February 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Warning to Restricted Licence Holders

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    The case of Concept Scaffolding Services Ltd, recently heard by the Traffic Commissioner for the East of England and Senior Traffic Commissioner, Richard Turfitt, has highlighted issues from which other licence holders might learn.

    The company holds a restricted goods vehicle operator’s licence authorising two vehicles. Both directors, Andrew Erskine and Karl Takkou were present at the hearing.

    On 4 September 2024, a Traffic Examiner stopped a vehicle driven by Karl Takkou and discovered multiple infractions. Mr. Takkou failed to insert his digital tachograph driver card, admitting he had left it in another vehicle despite knowing the requirement to use it. The vehicle also lacked an operator licence disc, and the vehicle unit had not been downloaded for over seven years. No driver card had been inserted into the vehicle’s unit for 28 days.

    A subsequent visit by another Traffic Examiner on 4 October 2024 was marked as unsatisfactory, identifying deficiencies in compliance systems. The investigation found prolonged failures to download vehicle unit and driver card data, as well as instances of driving without tachograph use.

    Simply put, directors had not adequately equipped themselves with the necessary knowledge to manage transport operations effectively. While they had engaged a transport consultant, serious concerns remained.

    In deciding to only curtail the licence by one vehicle for one month, Mr Turfitt took account of the corrective measures employed after the stop: introducing a driver defect reporting system, acquiring a company card for vehicle downloads, and adopting a structured compliance monitoring approach. Mr. Takkou had attended a Transport Manager Refresher Course, and the directors committed to ongoing compliance training. Additionally, driver Karl Takkou’s vocational entitlement was suspended for the same period.

    Commissioner Turfitt commented: “The Directors were so ill-equipped that there was little prospect of them meeting the licence obligations and yet it is difficult to understand why any business, which all carry obligations under health and safety legislation, had failed to identify the risks and to at least employ basic measures or seek advice. The fitness of this operator has been severely tarnished by their failures…Applicants should read the published guidance and work out what is required before even attempting to complete the application form. Scaffolders and similar operators applying for restricted operator licences need to start giving the same attention to these basic requirements as they would the tax or health & safety regimes.”

    Undertakings were accepted to ensure future compliance, including appointing an independent compliance auditor and ongoing oversight from a transport consultant. The operator must submit an audit report to the Office of the Traffic Commissioner within six months.

    While improvements have been noted, the Commissioner emphasised that compliance with licensing regulations is fundamental, and future breaches will result in harsher consequences.

    More details can be found here.

    For any further details or enquiries, please contact: pressoffice@otc.gov.uk

    Updates to this page

    Published 14 February 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: CCTV Network helps root out anti-social behaviour | Westminster City Council

    Source: City of Westminster

     Westminster City Council’s CCTV system is helping identify individuals who are committing crime and anti-social behaviour to keep residents safe. 

    A network of CCTV cameras fitted in local hotspots for anti-social behaviour is helping to bring perpetrators to justice.   

    Last year the council began rolling out a system of 100 cameras in Westminster strategically placed in areas identified as hotspots for crime, antisocial behaviour and other quality of life issues that affect our residents, businesses and visitors. This high-tech network is strategically focused on areas hit hardest by disruptive behaviour, sending a clear message that the council is committed to making its communities safer.

    The technology is already making a real impact.  Footage captured by the cameras is being shared with the police, providing critical evidence that helps to strengthen cases against offenders. This collaboration between the council and law enforcement is proving essential in swiftly addressing ASB and bringing offenders to justice.  

    For example, following an alleged fight that took place in a supermarket, the police were alerted, and a suspect was arrested shortly afterwards. The footage from the scene was later handed over to the police to support their case against the individual. 

    Acoustic noise cameras also form part of the council’s network. These cameras are only activated when noise levels exceed 90 decibels, equivalent to the sound of a lawnmower or power tool. These were triggered following an unregistered car meet that took place on Pall Mall. Following the incidents four drivers were issues with Fixed Penalty Notices.  

    Elsewhere in the borough the cameras have captured other crimes such as an attempted burglary, drug use and criminal damage to property and footage handed over the police will help bring the offenders to justice.   

    Cllr Aicha Less, Cabinet Member for Children and Public Protection:

    “We’re pleased that the CCTV camera network is helping to identify individuals who are causing disruption and enabling the police to respond to ASB quickly.   

    “These examples demonstrate how CCTV helps to keep residents safe. We know tackling anti-social behaviour and crime in our communities is a top priority for our residents, rolling out these cameras is making a difference.” 

    Video evidence from Westminster’s cameras: 

    Video one

    Footage of two men having a fight at the entrance of a supermarket. One the men then walks down the road and is later arrested by a police officer (not shown).  

    Video two

    An unregistered car meet at Pall Mall. A crowd of people have gathered and are watching cars do doughnuts in the street. The acoustic noise camera was triggered by the sound made by the car.  

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Discarding old friends for new autocrats

    Source: Green Party of England and Wales

    Green Party response to JD Vance speech (1)

    Green MP, and party parliamentary spokesperson on foreign affairs, Ellie Chowns said: “US Vice President JD Vance’s use of the Munich Security Conference to lambast allies rather than focus on the real chaos makers in the world is sadly predictable but no less bizarre and dangerous for that. 

    “President Trump’s administration seems determined to usher in a new world where old friends are discarded and new friends made of dangerous autocrats. The UK should have no part of that and should work with others to protect international frameworks and institutions that support co-operation and the rule of law.”

    (1) https://www.politico.eu/article/us-vice-president-jd-vance-attack-europe-migration-free-speech/

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Trailblazing apprenticeship programme for forestry sector reopens

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    The Professional Forester Apprenticeship programme offers an exciting career pathway into the forestry sector for people from all backgrounds

    A new call for foresters of the future has gone out for the next cohort of the innovative Professional Forester Apprenticeship programme.

    The forestry and timber sector plays a key role in ensuring our precious woods and forests are healthy and continue to flourish for generations to come, helping the country meet its net zero and environment targets, supporting economic growth, and providing multiple social benefits.

    The three-year, paid development opportunity is open to school leavers, graduates or anyone looking for a change in career direction and a rewarding job in the natural environment – with no day the same.

    In total, the scheme has already kickstarted 78 careers in forestry, and the reopening of the programme will offer more people the chance to be part of a new cohort of foresters. The Forestry Commission kick-started the scheme in 2022, and an increasing number of other organisations and businesses have taken the opportunity to host apprentices over the subsequent years. 

    This boost for forestry comes during of National Apprenticeships Week (Monday 10 February to Sunday 16 February), which celebrates the skills and value which apprenticeships create. Kickstarting economic growth by providing good employment opportunities across the country, including in rural areas, is a crucial part of the Government’s Plan for Change and apprenticeships like these are a great way to give people access to a new career.

    Forestry Commission Chief Executive Richard Stanford said:

    “The Professional Forester Apprenticeship programme offers people the chance to earn while they learn. Students have a mix of academic study and technical experience in the great outdoors and at the end of the programme can achieve a bachelor’s degree and chartered forester qualifications.

    “The continued success of this unique programme is heartening to see – people from all kinds of backgrounds and ages have been able to kickstart a new career. I urge anyone who is interested in finding a vocation looking after our trees, woods and forests, and who wants to work in a sector with lots of opportunities, to apply today.”

    Apprentice foresters from previous years have pointed to the variety of daily experiences, and the access to a wide range of expertise amongst the benefits provided by this apprenticeship programme.

    Apprentices on the scheme enjoy a combination of hands-on experience with the Forestry Commission and academic studies in forestry management led by the University of Cumbria. There is also potential for wider sector placements to further develop their skills and experience and improve future employment prospects. 

    Current apprentice Zoltan Varju said:

    “Nature has been a lifelong passion of mine and getting the opportunity to work to make sure we have healthy woodlands has been fantastic.  

    “I’ve also been glad to be trained while working, so that I can earn a salary while I’m learning instead of tuition fees. I’d recommend an apprenticeship for anyone looking for a career in forestry, it offers a great variety of experiences and it’s great to learn from people with years of experience in the job.

    Current apprentice Julia Churchill-Angus said:

    “Having spent the first part of my career developing and delivering environmental policy, I wanted to get more practical environmental management experience.

    “Forestry seemed like the perfect way to do this.  As a Development Woodland Officer, I’m also completing a degree and that’s been a great compliment to my job with lots of academic and practical training as well.”

    Upon completion of the programme, successful graduates will earn a Professional Forester Apprenticeship (equivalent to Level 6), a BSc (Hons) Professional Forester and will be able to apply for Chartered Forester status with the Institute of Chartered Foresters.

    Additional information:

    Updates to this page

    Published 14 February 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom