Category: US Senate

  • MIL-OSI USA: Padilla Presses Deputy Attorney General Nominee During Nomination Hearing

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Alex Padilla (D-Calif.)

    WATCH: Padilla criticizes Trump Administration’s unlawful firings of more than a dozen Inspectors General

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — Today, U.S. Senator Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) questioned President Trump’s nominee for U.S. Deputy Attorney General, Todd Blanche, during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing. Blanche was President Trump’s personal attorney in several criminal cases, including Trump’s New York hush money trial, in which the President was ultimately convicted of 34 felony counts. Padilla also condemned Trump’s attempt to unlawfully fire more than a dozen Inspectors General, and raised concerns about conflicts of interest regarding Blanche and the top officials at the Justice Department’s previous representation of Trump.  

    During the hearing, Padilla questioned Blanche on the Trump Administration’s unlawful firings of 19 Inspectors General across federal government agencies. Inspectors General play a critical role in identifying and preventing fraud, waste, and abuse within executive branch agencies. Following passage of the Securing Inspector General Independence Act of 2022, led by Senate Judiciary Chair Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), Congress must be given the legally required 30-day notice and reasonings regarding the dismissals of Inspectors General, which the Trump Administration ignored. Blanche refused to comment on the matter, despite Chair Grassley agreeing that the Inspectors General firings, in fact, did not follow the law.

    Padilla also voiced his concerns with Blanche’s personal ties to President Trump, noting that he, Attorney General Pam Bondi, and Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove could all face potential conflicts of interest since they all represented the President in a personal capacity.

    Key Excerpts:

    • PADILLA: When the President of the United States violates the law, it’s important to call it out. And let me underscore, this isn’t when the President of the United States strays from historical norms in how he or she does the job. It’s not when the President does different than what’s been standard practice for prior presidents. … I’m talking about when the President of the United States violates the law.
    • PADILLA: Mr. Blanche, when you walked into my office, you repeatedly told me that you will always follow the law — your words, “full stop” — and you’ve repeated that same message here today. It’s numerically, mathematically impossible for President Trump to have abided by the law in dismissing Inspectors General. Yes or no?
    • BLANCHE: My answer remains the same. I’m not going to comment on what the decision made by the White House Counsel and President Trump, and what he did.
    • PADILLA: I’m not talking about how they reached their decision. And you clearly know this is not a hypothetical. He didn’t give Congress 30 days’ notice, he violated the law, and I’m disappointed that you’re failing to acknowledge that.
    • PADILLA: My colleagues on the other side of the aisle have taken issue with us voicing our concern about President Trump filling the top ranks of the Justice Department with his friends, his allies, and personal attorneys. I can only imagine how they would have reacted if a Democratic President installed his own personal criminal defense attorneys as Attorney General, as Deputy Attorney General, as Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General.

    Earlier this month, Senator Padilla joined U.S. Senate Democratic Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Senate Judiciary Committee Democrats in demanding answers from Blanche and other Trump Administration nominees and officials on the removal or reassignment of career law enforcement officials across the Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Padilla previously opposed advancing the nomination of Attorney General Pam Bondi after she refused to affirm birthright citizenship, which is constitutionally guaranteed, and declined to disavow the false claim that the 2020 election was stolen during her Senate Judiciary Committee confirmation hearing. More information on Blanche’s nomination hearing is available here.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: WATCH: Padilla Slams RFK Jr. Nomination to Lead Health and Human Services

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Alex Padilla (D-Calif.)

    WATCH: Padilla Slams RFK Jr. Nomination to Lead Health and Human Services

    WATCH: Padilla calls RFK, Jr. “unfit and unprepared” to serve as HHS Secretary

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — Today, U.S. Senator Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) delivered remarks on the Senate floor to oppose the nomination of Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. to lead the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), raising the alarm on the disastrous public health implications if he is confirmed. Padilla called out RFK, Jr. for his severe lack of qualifications and his record of peddling dangerous public health misinformation.

    • “I oppose this nomination for his wildly misinformed beliefs and his utter lack of experience. I believe he is fundamentally unfit and unprepared — and Americans will be less healthy if he is confirmed.”

    RFK, Jr. has repeatedly spread dangerous conspiracy theories — for his own financial gain — even going as far as to say that “there’s no vaccine that is safe and effective.” Padilla called him out for making false accusations that vaccines cause autism, lying that the COVID-19 virus targeted specific racial and ethnic groups, founding his own anti-vaccine organization, authoring several books pushing public health conspiracies, and making millions off anti-vaccination lawsuits.

    • “In the face of all the proven science, proven again and again science, Mr. Kennedy has chosen to profit off fear. And countless parents are being misled into making dangerous decisions for their children.
    • “Look — I get the fear. I’m proud to represent California in the Senate. I’m proud to have an engineering background. But I too am a parent of three boys. And I remember what it was like to hold a baby in your arms, and to worry every time there was a sniffle and a cough. I’d do anything to protect my children, just as you would do anything to protect yours.
    • “But where families have reasonable questions on everything from doctors to diets, Mr. Kennedy simply sees dollar signs.”

    Padilla, a co-founder of the bipartisan Senate Mental Health Caucus, also highlighted the dangers RFK, Jr. poses to mental health care access and Medicaid benefits. He slammed RFK, Jr. for his dangerous lack of knowledge regarding Medicaid funding and benefits. 

    • “At a time when Republicans are looking to cut funding for lifesaving services, I’d rather see a fierce defender of Medicaid at HHS. Yet, during his confirmation hearings, Mr. Kennedy failed to show even a basic understanding of Medicaid. Not the sources of funding, not the benefits, and at one point, he even seemed to conflate or confuse Medicaid and Medicare.
    • “Colleagues, I shouldn’t have to say this: This is not a ‘learn on the job’ nomination.”

    As Republicans threaten major cuts to Medicaid, Padilla underscored the importance of confirming a nominee with the necessary qualifications and experience to protect public health. He urged his colleagues to vote against RFK, Jr.’s confirmation.

    • “Republicans are already floating cuts to Medicaid to pay for even more tax breaks for the rich. In the White House, President Trump and his Shadow President Musk have proven they’ll shutter any agency that stands in their way.
    • “And today, we’re left wondering who will speak up to protect the health of millions of Americans. Unfortunately, Mr. Kennedy has already shown he is not up to the task. So colleagues, I urge you to join me in fighting to protect the health of our constituents and oppose the confirmation of Mr. Kennedy.”

    Video of Senator Padilla’s full remarks is available here.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Senator Marshall Joins Senator Moran, Hoeven on Moving Food for Peace to USDA

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Kansas Roger Marshall
    Washington, D.C. – Yesterday, U.S. Senator Roger Marshall, M.D. joined Senators Moran, Hoeven, and Representatives Mann, Crawford, Newhouse, and Rouzer, as well as House Agriculture Chairman Thompson in introducing legislation to move the Food for Peace program from the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) to the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA).
    “Food for Peace was started in Kansas by farmers who wanted to feed people in need across the world. Now, over 70 years later, the mission continues. The USDA understands farmers and food distribution better than any other agency in town, and moving the jurisdiction of Food for Peace under the USDA ensures that American grain is going to the people who need it most,” said Senator Marshall. “As President Trump and congressional leadership continue to find ways to curb wasteful spending and promote our nations’ goods and commodities, this is a step in the right direction toward a brighter future for America, its farmers, and the original mission of Food for Peace.”
    “The move of this program to USDA strengthens our ability to get food to those who need it most while supporting US sorghum farmers,” said Amy France, National Sorghum Producers Chairwoman. “NSP supports this shift, as it ensures the long-term success of Food for Peace and the efforts to deliver American-grown sorghum to food-insecure communities worldwide.”
    “Kansas farmers take great pride in Food for Peace and the impact the program and American commodities have had on feeding the world,” said Chris Tanner, Kansas Association of Wheat Growers President. “Moving Food for Peace to USDA would continue to provide the needed relief for people in need.”
    “Kansas-grown sorghum is a critical crop for food security in America and abroad,” said Adam York, CEO of Kansas Sorghum Producers Association. “Throughout changes in administrations, sorghum farmers have worked to have a seat at the table in international food programs housed across many agencies to ensure America’s farmers can contribute to our national security. We recommend policy makers continue prioritizing American agriculture as a solution to challenges in domestic and foreign policy.”
    “Our nation’s millers take great pride in feeding those facing famine emergencies around the world,” said Kim Z Cooper, Vice President of Government Affairs for the North American Millers’ Association. “Our flagship emergency food aid program Food for Peace not only helps those abroad, but is a critical component of Buy American and America First policies.”
    Senator Marshall has championed reforms to the Food for Peace program in the past, co-leading the America’s Farmers Feed the World Act, which sought to restore the Food for Peace program to its original intent by using U.S.-grown commodities to fight global hunger rather than spending American taxpayers’ dollars on foreign goods with limited oversight and accountability safeguards.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Senator Marshall Releases Statement After Kansas Governor Laura Kelly Vetoes Bill Protecting Minors

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Kansas Roger Marshall
    Washington, D.C. – U.S. Senator Roger Marshall, M.D. issued the following statement after Kansas Governor Laura Kelly vetoed Senate Bill 63 (SB 63), which if signed into law would have protected Kansas children from genital mutilation and irreversible hormone replacement treatments.
    “Governor Laura Kelly’s veto of a bill that would have protected Kansas children from mutilation and irreversible hormone replacement treatments is disgraceful,” said Senator Marshall. “Yet again, Governor Kelly is putting her radical liberal ideology above the safety of Kansas kids. Child mutilation is not a parental right and on the contrary, should be criminal. I look forward to the legislature overriding this insane veto.”
    BACKGROUND
    Last December, Senator Marshall introduced the Safeguarding the Overall Protection of Minors Act, a bill that would protect our children from transgender procedures and irreversible hormone replacement treatments.
    Along with this legislation, Senator Marshall also recently led the Defining Male and Female Act to ensure the legal definition of sex is based on facts, not feelings, which would protect exclusive spaces for women like bathrooms and locker rooms. 
    In November 2024, Senator Marshall brought together a coalition to sound the alarm on the extreme gender ideology war being waged against America’s children and to talk about solutions, including the Safeguarding the Overall Protection of Minors Act.
    Senator Marshall is a medical doctor with more than 25 years of experience. He has also delivered over 5,000 babies.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: “He’s a Danger,” King Warns in Floor Speech Against RFK Jr. Nomination

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Maine Angus King

    WASHINGTON, D.C.  U.S. Senator Angus King (I-ME) tonight took to the floor of the Senate to share his concern over President Trump’s nomination of Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. to serve as the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS). In the speech, Senator King began his remarks by outlining the roles of Congress and the Presidency as America’s Founders envisioned: to make laws and to execute laws, respectively.  He then turned to the HHS candidate, speaking to Kennedy’s lack of experience and qualifications needed to run a large-scale health organization, and pointed out Kennedy’s long held public opinions as hostile toward the mission of the agency. He also warned of Kennedy’s dangerous skepticism toward proven, life-saving vaccines, sharing a childhood memory of a classmate who had polio.

    “Mr. President, I’d like to begin my remarks this afternoon by talking a little bit about the Constitution. I spent some time last week talking about the Constitution and our failure to observe that the Constitutional, fundamental structure of the division of power between the Congress and the Executive is being violated and the Congress is allowing it to happen. Another provision of the Constitution is the provision in Article I about advise and consent. It’s a fundamental check and balance built into the Constitution by the framers for a reason. It wasn’t a throw-away line or a few sentences that were put in because they wanted to fill the paragraph out. Again, it’s part of the structure that was designed to protect us from tyranny. And the structure involved the division of power, the separation of power because the framers knew that if all power was concentrated in a single individual or single institution, that institution or that individual would inevitably abuse our people. That’s human nature. That’s 1,000 years of human nature. All power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. So, the advise and consent provision was in the Constitution for a reason. It was in there for a reason, in order to provide a check on the executive and the people who were going to be put in charge of running the administration. 

    “By the way, I want to stop for a minute and focus on the word administration and the word executive, because it really goes to the discussion we’re having in this country right now about how our government is supposed to work. The executive comes from the word execute, and the word execute means put into action. It doesn’t mean initiate the action. It means put it into action. The same for the term administration. There’s a reason we call it the administration. They are to administer the laws. In fact, the obligation on the president in Article II is to see that the laws are faithfully executed. And it does not give the president the power to ignore laws or to decide which laws he or she thinks are okay, to ignore the responsibility and constitutional authority of the congress to define spending. It does not give the president that power. Although, the fellow we approved for Office of Management and Budget last week thinks he has that power. Or this President or any president has that power. That’s absolutely antithetical to the Constitution, as established by the framers. So, administration means administer the laws, executive means execute the laws, not make them. We make the laws here and the administration is to faithfully execute those laws. 

    “Now, let’s talk about advise and consent. Advise and consent means we have a responsibility — a Constitutional responsibility to consider each of the president’s nominees for these important jobs. This isn’t something that we may do or occasionally do. This is a fundamental part of our job. We take an oath when we come here to defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic. I think it’s interesting — they knew in 1787 that there was a potential for domestic enemies to the Constitution. So we have an obligation to take advise and consent seriously. 

    “Now, I’m a former governor, as is the presiding officer. And as a former executive, I believe the executive should have the ability to choose the team that they want, to choose their advisors. To choose the people they will work with, with some limitations. In other words, I start with the premise of the person elected should perhaps get the benefit of the doubt is a little too strong, but I start with the premise that they were elected and they should be able to choose the team that they are going to be working with. However, I think there are two qualifications. This has been my stated position on this since I entered the Senate. Benefit of the doubt to the executive, however, the nominee must be manifestly qualified and not hostile to the mission of the agency to which they’ve had been appointed. Two criteria that for me give life to the idea of advise and consent. 

    “Okay, let’s talk about Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. He, unfortunately, checks both of the boxes as to being disqualified. Number one, he’s not remotely qualified to run an organization. He has no experience running anything remotely like the scope and scale of the Department of Health and Human Services. No executive experience in that sense. So that’s number one. Is he qualified? No. He’s grossly unqualified. But the second box is he hostile to the mission of the agency? And if the mission of the agency, HHS, is to protect the health of the American people, I would argue he is manifestly hostile to that mission. There’s been a lot of discussion here today and I think it’s interesting. I haven’t heard too many people come up on the floor and support this nominee and tell us why he should be approved because, you know what, Mr. President? If this were a secret ballot, this man wouldn’t get 20 votes. Everybody in this body knows he’s not qualified. Everybody in this body knows he has no business anywhere near this position. But here we are. We’re going to take a vote. Unfortunately, it will probably be on a party-line basis. 

    “But let me focus on just one little piece. On January 29, barely a week ago, before the Senate Finance Committee, here’s what Mr. Kennedy said. Quote, “news reports have claimed that I’m antivaccine or anti-industry. I am neither. I am pro-safety. All of my kids are vaccinated.” I bet that came as news to all of the folks he’s been leading astray over the last 25-30 years. I believe vaccines have a critical role in health care. I am reminded of Saul on the road to Damascus. A miraculous conversion. A bright light was shown and suddenly the scales fell from his eyes in his confirmation hearing. Okay, let’s go back a little over a year, July 6, 2023, this is a quote, a direct quote, “there is no vaccine that is safe and effective.” He later said, on the same podcast, ‘vaccines are inherently unsafe.’ Mr. President, this man shouldn’t be confirmed because he told the committee and the Senate something diametrically opposed to the position he’s taken the last 30 years, all of his adult life. 

    “Maya Angelou said, “If somebody tells you who they are, you should believe them.” And he’s told us repeatedly. And he has acted on his vaccine skepticism. This wasn’t something that was rumbling around in his head. He’s traveled the world. He’s written articles, gone on podcasts, gone on TV and he’s discouraged people from being vaccinated. And now he has this miraculous conversion 10 days ago. ‘All my kids are vaccinated. I believe vaccines have a critical role in health care.’ The same thing during COVID. He said, ‘it is criminal medical malpractice to give a child one of these vaccines.’ Wow, criminal malpractice. And of course it’s been discussed. He said I do believe that autism does come from vaccines. July of 2023 there was one study in England — I think it was in 1998 — that showed that — purported to show a tenuous convection between vaccines and — connection between vaccines and autism. I’m reasonably confident that one of the authors recanted. It was withdrawn and it’s been debunked over and over and over again, but this man has been peddling this lie for 20 years, and who knows how many parents have fallen for that on the one hand who knows how many children have paid the price. Just to talk about vaccines, at one point during the pandemic, there was a survey — July of 2021 — remember, that was the height of it — they surveyed 50 hospitals in 17 states. 94% of the patients hospitalized in July of 2021 were unvaccinated. What does that tell you? Vaccinations worked. And people who were unvaccinated were at enormously higher risk. 94% of the people were unvaccinated.

    “In addition to the vaccination issue, this guy — this man doesn’t respect the FDA, the agency that was put in place to protect our health, to regulate us, to be sure that we’re getting safe medications, to deal with some of the awful problems of the potential of harmful medications literally getting into America’s bloodstream. In December of 2024, barely a couple months ago, he said he would fire officials at the FDA. And in October 2024 he said on X, ‘FDA’s war on public health is about to end. If you work for the FDA and are part of this corrupt work, two messages for you: prepare your records and pack your bags.’ He didn’t say a certain office in the FDA or a certain part of the FDA or maybe there was one provision, a part that he didn’t think was helpful. He said, if you work for the FDA, that’s everybody, preserve your records and pack your bags. 

    “This man is not only unqualified, he’s anti-qualified. He’s a danger. We have physicians in the Senate — I believe that the Hippocratic oath, do no harm, should apply to Senate votes. You should not be voting for somebody who you know is going to do harm to the public health. So this is really a kind of surreal debate because everybody in this chamber knows this man should not be Secretary of Health and Human Services. 

    “Now, I want to end with a personal story. One of the few advantages of being older is that you have a long memory. And in 1952 I was entering the third grade at Macarthur School in Alexander, Virginia. In my class was a kid named Butch. And he was horribly twisted into a wheelchair. I don’t think I’d ever seen a wheelchair when I was going into the third grade. He was there, and I’m not even going to say how many years later, but I can close my eyes and see Butch in that chair. Polio was what he had. He was in pain daily. He could barely make himself understood. His arms were crossed. His legs were bent grotesquely in the wheelchair. And three years later the Salk Vaccine began what turned out to be the elimination of Polio. Where would we be as a country if this man had been the head at that time it was HEW and somehow put a stop to this vaccine, which I believe he has said even the Polio vaccine should be rescinded, which has saved millions of lives around the world. Where would we be? I can’t escape the memory of that boy in that wheelchair. I can’t forget the memory of my parents not letting me go to the public swimming pool because of the fear of Polio. Not being able to go out in the summer and play because of the fear of Polio that stalked the land. The former Republican leader was a victim of Polio. Former President Franklin D. Roosevelt was a victim of Polio. It was the vaccine. And, Mr. President, I hope this place comes to its senses and rejects this surreal nomination. It would be probably be hard to find somebody less qualified to serve in this position. I believe that it will lead to damage to our country, to our health, to our children, and I urge my colleagues to vote no. If you vote yes, you’ll regret it. Thank you, Mr. President. I yield the floor.”

    Senator King has been continuously sounding the alarm on President Donald Trump’s existential threat to the Constitution: he declared that the proposal to halt all federal grant and loan disbursement was illegal and a direct assault on the Constitution. More recently, he joined 36 Senators in a letter to Secretary of State Marco Rubio, sharing the detrimental effects of  the Trump Administration’s dismantling of the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). He also joined fellow Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI) colleagues in writing a letter to the White House about the risks to national security by allowing unvetted Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) staff and representatives to access classified and sensitive government materials. Last week, he spoke on the Senate floor to share his growing concerns over the Trump Administration’s largely unconstitutional and unprecedented overreach; in the speech he cited the Founding Fathers to add historical perspective to the decision facing the Senate, including the importance of the separation of powers.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Duckworth Outlines How Trump’s Attack on USAID is Hurting National Security and All Americans

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Illinois Tammy Duckworth
    February 12, 2025
    [WASHINGTON, D.C.] – Today, U.S. Senator Tammy Duckworth (D-IL)—a member of the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee (SFRC)—outlined how President Donald Trump’s illegal foreign assistance freeze and dismantling of USAID undermines our national security, empowers our adversaries and jeopardizes Americans’ economic security. Her discussion with the panel highlighted how USAID programs abroad help improve the global competitiveness of American products. Video of Duckworth’s full remarks can be found on the Senator’s YouTube.
    “Donald Trump promised he’d lower costs and keep Americans safe, but his attack on USAID is doing the opposite: hurting our national security and empowering our adversaries,” Duckworth said. “The only people winning here are our adversaries and those who thrive on chaos—whether that be the PRC, Russia or Elon Musk. Meanwhile, Trump’s destructive actions are causing real harm to people’s lives and their livelihoods.”
    Duckworth has repeatedly called out President Donald Trump and his Administration’s illegal attack on USAID. Last week, Duckworth led her fellow SFRC Democratic colleagues in demanding immediate answers from U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio on how much it will cost American taxpayers to pull USAID workers off the job overseas and relocate them back to the United States. Duckworth also spoke out against Trump’s ongoing illegal power grabs—including the shuttering of USAID—on the Senate floor as part of Senate Democrats’ 30-hour protest opposing Project 2025 architect Russell Vought’s nomination to serve as the Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). As a result of Trump’s ongoing lawlessness, Duckworth also announced that she will be a blanket-no on all remaining top-level cabinet nominees.
    -30-

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: February 12th, 2025 Heinrich Delivers Floor Speech Opposing the Nomination of Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. for Health Secretary

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for New Mexico Martin Heinrich

    VIDEO

    WASHINGTON — This afternoon, U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.) delivered remarks on the Senate floor amplifying the voices of New Mexicans opposing the nomination of Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. to be the U.S. Secretary for Health and Human Services.

    “I hope all of my colleagues take seriously what it would mean to confirm this anti-vaccine, anti-science snake oil salesman as our next Secretary of Health and Human Services,” said Heinrich.

    VIDEO: U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.) delivers remarks on the Senator floor opposing the nomination of Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. for Health Secretary, February 12, 2025.

    Heinrich began his remarks by recounting how Mr. Kennedy’s 2019 trip to the Pacific island of Samoa intensified vaccine skepticism and contributed to a deadly measles outbreak that killed 83 people, mostly children under five. Heinrich said: “As someone with a background in science, but more importantly, as a father of two, I am horrified by this story. Thanks to incredible scientific research and medical advances, we now have a vaccine that has proven to be safe and effective at protecting our kids and largely eradicated the measles outbreaks that used to result in the devastating loss of babies and young children. That is until anti-vaccine crusaders like Mr. Kennedy started promoting phony science and conspiracy theories in places like Samoa.”

    Heinrich condemned Mr. Kennedy’s long track record of spreading fear, peddling misinformation, and promoting conspiracy theories: “Mr. Kennedy has repeatedly and falsely alleged that safe and effective vaccines for tetanus, the flu, COVID, and HPV are dangerous to human health. Mr. Kennedy has promoted the completely discredited conspiracy theory that vaccines lead to autism. At the height of the COVID-19 pandemic that led to more than one million deaths in the United States alone, Mr. Kennedy campaigned to end the nationwide vaccination effort that helped us save millions more lives. Mr. Kennedy has — again without any sound evidence — also pushed conspiracy theories claiming that antidepressant medications cause mass shootings and chemicals in our water make children gay. If those claims sound ludicrous, it’s because they are.”

    Heinrich warned that, if he is confirmed to lead the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Mr. Kennedy has committed to following President Trump’s orders to further roll back women’s reproductive rights: “During his confirmation process, Mr. Kennedy also reportedly made commitments to my Republican colleagues to support restrictions on mifepristone, a medication abortion and miscarriage management drug. Mr. Kennedy has also signaled to Republican senators that he will go along with whatever President Trump wants to further roll back women’s reproductive rights.”

    Heinrich also cautioned that Mr. Kennedy would help to enact President Trump and Elon Musk’s dangerous agenda to drastically cut federal funding for everything from New Mexicans’ Medicaid health coverage to medical research at the University of New Mexico. Heinrich warned: “The Department of Health and Human Services oversees health coverage programs that serve half of all Americans, including Medicare, Medicaid, and the Affordable Care Act. HHS also supports the medical research that helps us develop the next vaccines, prevent the next pandemic, and find cures to cancer and chronic diseases like diabetes. We have also already seen President Trump, Elon Musk, and his DOGE minions target scientific and medical research at agencies like the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Just last week, we saw them announce an estimated $4 billion cut for NIH health research at universities all across our country—including an estimated $17 million impact at the University of New Mexico alone.”

    Heinrich finished his remarks by amplifying the concerns of New Mexicans who have written or called into his office expressing concern over Mr. Kennedy’s nomination. Watch a video of Heinrich uplifting New Mexicans’ voices here.

    “I agree with these New Mexicans that Mr. Kennedy is unprepared, unqualified, and dangerously unfit to be confirmed as our next Health Secretary,” Heinrich concluded. “To protect our kids’ health from debunked conspiracy theories, to defend women’s reproductive rights, to safeguard the future of Medicare and Medicaid, and to continue lifesaving medical research and medical care in my state and across the country, I urge all of my colleagues to join me in voting NO on confirming Robert F. Kennedy Jr.”

    Heinrich has been amplifying the voices of New Mexicans who have written or called into his office expressing concern over President Trump’s harmful actions and unqualified nominees.

    Last night on the Senate floor, Heinrich uplifted New Mexicans’ concerns over Tulsi Gabbard’s nomination for the Director of National Intelligence. In his remarks, Heinrich emphasized the risk Gabbard’s nomination poses to our national security and discussed Ms. Gabbard’s lack of qualifications and judgment, particularly relating to her 2017 trip to Bashar al-Assad’s Syria. Heinrich zeroed in on Ms. Gabbard’s false denial during her confirmation hearing before the Senate Intelligence Committee about meeting with Ahmad Badreddin Hassoun, Syria’s most senior Sunni Muslim cleric during the Assad regime who made threats to conduct suicide bomb attacks in the United States.

    Last week, Heinrich delivered remarks on the Senate floor amplifying the voices of New Mexicans opposing the nomination of Russell Vought to lead the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). Mr. Vought is the lead architect of the Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025, the policy blueprint for Donald Trump’s harmful agenda to throw the government into chaos and harm working families.

    Last month, Heinrich delivered the longest speech of his career, where he slammed President Trump’s unlawful unilateral blockade of all federal grant funding. In his remarks, Heinrich uplifted stories from New Mexicans on how Trump’s federal funding freeze endangered New Mexicans and threatened communities across the state. Find the video of Heinrich sharing letters from New Mexicans on the Senate floor here.

    Heinrich is leading Senate Democrats in sounding the alarm on Elon Musk and Donald Trump’s destructive actions that are wreaking havoc on Americans, weakening our economy, and threatening the livelihoods of New Mexicans.

    Last week, in an interview with Jim Sciutto on CNN’s The Situation Room, Heinrich vocalized the concerns of his constituents who continue to write-in and call his office opposing Trump’s harmful actions, which are impacting New Mexico families and their financial security. Watch the full video of that interview here.

    Since Trump took office in 2025, Heinrich:

    • Introduced a resolution condemning Trump’s pardons of people found guilty of assaulting police officers on January 6.
    • Led Senate Democrats in sounding the alarm on Elon Musk and Donald Trump’s destructive actions that are wreaking havoc on Americans, weakening our economy, and threatening the livelihoods of New Mexicans.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Senator Peters Blasts Trump Administration for Shuttering the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Michigan Gary Peters
    Published: 02.12.2025
    CFPB Protects Americans, Particularly Servicemembers and Military Families, Against Predatory and Illegal Financial Scams; Has Returned $20 Billion from Banks to Americans Since it was Created

    WASHINGTON, DC – U.S. Senator Gary Peters (MI) joined his colleagues in calling for the Trump Administration to immediately reverse its decision to shutter the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). The CFPB provides relief to Americans who have been wronged by unethical practices from banks, payday lenders, and other financial companies by investigating and addressing consumer complaints about financial products and services. For example, the CFPB put in place rules that prevent mortgage lenders from issuing loans with hidden terms and costs that have caused people to lose their homes. The CFPB has also taken action against unreasonable bank overdraft fees which has encouraged other banks to remove or reduce their overdraft policies to avoid being penalized. Since the agency’s creation, the CFPB has returned over $21 billion owed to American consumers who have fallen victim to abusive and illegal activity from financial institutions.
    In a letter led by Peters and his colleagues, the senators underscored how the Administration’s decision to close the CFPB and idle its nearly 2,000 employees will make Americans more susceptible to predatory lending and other deceitful financial practices, particularly servicemembers and military families who are at heightened risk of being targeted by these tactics. This is because the Administration’s decision also halted key CFPB oversight of protections from the Military Lending Act (MLA) and Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (SCRA) that prevent servicemembers from being taken advantage of. These protections support our military readiness, recruitment, and retention efforts by allowing servicemembers to focus on their service obligations while on active duty, rather than worrying about making ends meet at home. Peters and his colleagues urged the CFPB to resume its essential work of investigating violations of consumer financial protection laws and taking actions against scammers and payday lenders to protect the financial well-being of our military families and all Americans.
    “This funding, supervision, enforcement, and communications freeze will hit military families especially hard. Without a functional CFPB, military families will be stripped of their financial protections under the bipartisan Military Lending Act (MLA) that they have earned and deserve by serving our Nation,” Peters and the senators wrote. “The CFPB is the primary agency responsible for supervising and enforcing the MLA against nonbank financial companies, including payday lenders, pawnshops, and debt collectors who have charged servicemembers interest rates as high as 600% and who have threatened to derail their careers if they do not pay up.”
    “Accordingly, we request that the CFPB continue to supervise and investigate violations of the consumer financial protection laws and take forceful enforcement actions against lenders that violate the law, especially when it comes to predatory lending that harms our military readiness. We also request that the CFPB continue to make public communications to consumers, especially to servicemembers regarding the rights that they are owed under the SCRA,” the letter concluded.
    To read the full text of the letter, click here.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: ICYMI: Delaying RFK Jr. Confirmation Vote on Senate Floor, Warren Highlights Kennedy’s Egregious Conflicts of Interest, “Long History of Promoting Anti-Science Conspiracy Theories”

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Massachusetts – Elizabeth Warren

    February 12, 2025

    Warren, Democrats hold Senate floor for 30 hours to oppose “dangerous” RFK Jr. confirmation 

    “Kennedy’s actions speak louder than his latest words, and time and time again, Kennedy has shown us who he is: An anti-science conspiracy peddler who is willing to gamble with American lives. We know who he is, we need to pay attention.”

    “(W)hile you and your family are forced to deal with the grave consequences of Kennedy’s conspiracy-driven health care decisions, Kennedy could set himself up to make millions of dollars off his anti-vaccine crusade – just like he’s been doing for decades. ” 

    Video of Remarks (YouTube)

    Washington, D.C. – On the floor of the United States Senate, Senator Elizabeth Warren, a member of the Senate Finance Committee, joined Democrats in delaying a final vote to confirm Robert F. Kennedy Jr. for Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services. Senator Warren warned that American families and children would pay the price for Mr. Kennedy’s “conspiracy-driven health care decisions,” while his serious ethics conflicts remain unresolved. 

    Senator Warren called on her colleagues to oppose his nomination. The Senate is scheduled to vote on Mr. Kennedy’s confirmation on the morning of February 13, 2025. 

    Transcript: Floor Speech Opposing the Confirmation of Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Nominee for Secretary of Health and Human Services
    U.S. Senate Floor
    February 12, 2025 
    As Delivered

    Senator Elizabeth Warren: Thank you, Mr. President. And I want to say thanks to the Senator from Minnesota for her leadership on this point. I know that the great research institutions in Minnesota that count on her support are out there fighting thanks to Donald Trump, as they are in Massachusetts. And the people all around this country that rely on those research institutions, who are looking for those cures, for those better treatments, for those opportunities in their lives that right now Donald Trump and his co-president, Elon Musk, seem to want to cut off. So we will stay in this fight. We will indeed. 

    I am here today because Americans didn’t vote to bring back measles.

    Americans didn’t vote to bring back polio.

    Americans didn’t vote to bring back dangerous diseases that we thought we had wiped out decades ago. 

    Americans didn’t vote to get rid of critical vaccines that we know — based on science — we know save lives.

    But that is what Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s vision would mean for Americans. That is the vision Donald Trump will empower him to carry out.

    Kennedy not only worked to undercut vaccines at home and abroad, he’s made a lot of money doing it. In fact, Kennedy has made millions off of peddling harmful conspiracy theories that hurt real people. He opposed the life-saving Covid vaccine just six months into the pandemic. And he’s set himself up so that he and his family could make millions more from putting Americans’ health at risk.

    One thing is very clear: We cannot trust Robert Kennedy to make health care decisions that will affect every person in this country.

    Right now, millions of Americans are sitting down for dinner with their kids. And I hope we just think for a minute about what RFK Jr.’s plans would mean for them.

    Will their teeth decay because Kennedy took fluoride out of our water based on some conspiracy theory? 

    Will they have to worry about getting measles at school because Kennedy is spreading anti-vax conspiracies on government letterhead? 

    Will parents have to risk their kids getting polio—and maybe dying—by sending them to daycare because Kennedy used HHS rules to open the door to a flood of bogus lawsuits that forced manufacturers to pull the vaccines?

    Look, here’s the thing: Robert Kennedy has spent years on an anti-vaccine crusade, spreading baseless conspiracy theories under the guise of protecting children, so we don’t need to guess the level of harm he will cause; his past already tells us everything we need to know.   

    In July 2018, two children died immediately after receiving a measles vaccine that nurses had incorrectly mixed with a muscle relaxant. Within weeks, the Samoan Health Ministry publicly confirmed the nursing error and charged the nurses with manslaughter. Nevertheless, leading anti-vaccine groups, including Kennedy’s own organization, Children’s Health Defense, exploited public fears to question the reports and spread baseless claims.

    On August 5th, 2018, Kennedy’s organization, Children’s Health Defense, posted on Facebook, and I will quote the post. “Were these once-healthy children the only two to receive MMR that day? If not, why were they the only ones to die? Research needs to determine susceptibility so that no child is ever injured.” Del Bigtree, Kennedy’s partner and former campaign manager, also released a video linking the tragedy to false claims about measles, and telling his followers to “share it with everyone you know. This is how we are changing the world.” 

    Now, amidst public distrust and a paused vaccine program in Samoa, the vaccination rates plummeted. About 10 months later, once the Samoan government had finally stood up against the disinformation and resumed the vaccine program, Kennedy visited the island to meet with the Prime Minister.

    Later, recognizing the blowback that comes with how much went wrong when a conspiracy theory cost people their lives, Kennedy has since denied that his visit had anything to do with vaccines and said that anything suggesting otherwise was an “industry propaganda trope.” In other words, totally false. “Industry propaganda trope.” 

    Kennedy lied. A blog post that Kennedy himself wrote in 2021 admits he went to Samoa to meet with the Prime Minister, who wanted to discuss the possibility of “measur(ing) health outcomes following the ‘natural experiment’ created by the nation’s respite from vaccines.” 

    Think about what that means. Another way to say it is that Kennedy was interested in taking advantage of how the vaccination rate had plummeted, caused by misinformation, so that they could conduct uncontrolled trials on whether unvaccinated kids were healthier than vaccinated kids, a conspiracy theory he has spread widely. You see, at the time, one of his traveling partners was working on a similar study with two anti-vaccine activists, which was ultimately retracted following an investigation that “raised several methodological issues and confirmed that the conclusions were not supported by strong scientific data.” 

    Now, there’s no surprise here. The Prime Minister declined Kennedy’s outrageous proposal – he didn’t want his country to be Kennedy’s guinea pig. He didn’t want unvaccinated children to be studied to see what happened to them when measles or other diseases broke out. But that didn’t stop him from spreading his message. On this trip to Samoa, he met with various anti-vaccine influencers, one of whom said the meeting was “profoundly monumental for (the) movement.” A few months after Kennedy left, in October 2019, the vaccination rate in Samoa hit an historic low of 31%, down from 74% the prior year – and no surprise, a massive measles outbreak erupted. So here is Kennedy telling us now he had nothing, nothing to do with this, his trip to Samoa had nothing to do with the measles vaccine and calling any claim “industry propaganda trope.” And yet, he himself posted a blog about meeting with the Prime Minister and talking about a study to measure health outcomes following a natural experiment of studying children–some with no vaccination and some that were vaccinated. And the anti-vax groups that he met with talked about how profoundly important it is, then Mr. Kennedy leaves, vaccination rates drop down to 31%.

    The measles outbreak was truly tragic. In total, more than 70 children died, right up until a door-to-door vaccination campaign brought the disaster to an end.

    As HHS Secretary, Kennedy would be responsible for whether we keep our children vaccinated or subject them to, in his words, the same “natural experiment” he was interested in testing in Samoa.

    Is that what we want for our kids? Is that what we want for our elderly parents? That is a living nightmare — and it could truly be our reality with Kennedy heading up the Department of Health and Human Services. And all the while that this is going on, while Kennedy is promoting this anti-vax theory, he and his family are profiting off of the plan.

    Now, I’ve been sounding the alarm about Kennedy since the minute Donald Trump announced that he would nominate him for HHS Secretary. It’s not just that he’s unqualified — his long history of promoting anti-science conspiracy theories make him disqualified.

    This is a man who claimed “there is no vaccine that is safe and effective.” “No vaccine.” 

    He said that the polio vaccine “killed many, many more people” than polio ever did. Now, Kennedy came to our committee and said don’t worry, he swears anti-vaccine. But he’s spent his entire career on an anti-vaccine crusade, spreading baseless conspiracy theories under the guise of protecting children and making millions in the process.

    And when, in Senate hearings, he was confronted with his own words, he simply denied saying them.  Denied saying them— despite the videotapes, the transcripts, the blog posts, and the people who heard them. Kennedy thinks he knows what he needs to say to try to get the job that will put him in charge of our vaccine program, so he says he didn’t say exactly what he said.

    Kennedy’s actions speak louder than his latest words, and time and time again, Kennedy has shown us who he is: An anti-science conspiracy peddler who is willing to gamble with American lives. We know who he is, we need to pay attention.

    Let’s do a quick count of some of the ways that, as HHS Secretary, Kennedy could make the anti-vaccine lawsuits — and his own payouts — even bigger. What could Kennedy do? Well, as Secretary of HHS: 

    • He could publish his anti-vaccine conspiracies, but this time on U.S. government letterhead — something that might impress a jury in a subsequent trial. 
    • He could appoint people to the CDC vaccine panel who share his anti-vax views and let them do his dirty work.
    • He could tell the CDC vaccine panel to remove a particular vaccine from the vaccination schedule. 
    • He could remove vaccines from a special compensation program, which would “open up manufacturers to mass torts (lawsuits).” 
    • He could “make more injuries eligible for compensation even if there’s no causal evidence.” 
    • He could change vaccine court processes to make it easier to bring junk lawsuits that could get vaccines pulled from the market.
    • He could turn over FDA (data) to his friends at the law firm, and they could use it however benefits their lawsuits. 

    In short, as HHS Secretary, Kennedy would have the power to make health care decisions that would affect millions of Americans — for working Americans, kids, seniors — on everything from vaccines to abortion to life-saving drugs. Kennedy would have the capacity, as head of HHS, to make it easier to sue vaccine manufacturers. And in an area where the profit margins on vaccines are quite modest, if those lawsuits mount up, vaccines could simply disappear from the market altogether. Manufacturers could decide, “you know, it’s just not worth the lawsuits. We’ll go produce other drugs.” 

    Those kinds of decisions are critically important, and the consequences are grave. For many Americans, they may be the difference between life and death. And they can change lives forever.

    So, while you and your family are forced to deal with the grave consequences of Kennedy’s conspiracy-driven health care decisions, Kennedy could set himself up to make millions of dollars off his anti-vaccine crusade – just like he’s been doing for decades. 

    Remember, the very first ethics agreement that Kennedy submitted to us on the Senate Finance Committee, he said that even while serving as HHS Secretary, he planned to keep his financial stake in ongoing litigation — including vaccine-related litigation. That means that from the jump, Kennedy’s plan was to keep making money off the backs of lawsuits against vaccine manufacturers, some of which directly related to the very products he would have the power to regulate as Secretary of HHS. So, there he is. He has the power to regulate these drugs. He has the power to make life a little better or a little worse for the vaccine manufacturers. He has the power to make it more likely that lawsuits against vaccine manufacturers would succeed. And his initial plan was even while he sat there as Secretary of HHS, he was going to keep on making money from that. 

    This was a damning conflict of interest, so we called it out. Kennedy told us okay, okay, he would submit an updated ethics agreement. Sounds good? What was his update?

    Well, he said instead of personally keeping the millions he’d make off these ongoing lawsuits… he would hand that money directly to his son. Later, he confirmed that the son he’s handing his interests off to is the one who works at Wisner Baum—the same law firm that Kennedy has maintained his very lucrative arrangement with over years, so far netting him a reported $2.5 million just in the last few years. And Kennedy has made clear that he can use his tools as HHS Secretary to open up the door for more anti-vax litigation, and once he’s through as Secretary of HHS, go right back to Wisner Baum and cash in on the new flood of cases that Kennedy himself has unleashed.

    So that is Kennedy’s idea of “fixing” an ethics issue.

    And beyond that, Kennedy has flip-flopped countless times in his answers to the Finance Committee. He is untrustworthy. He has made so many contradictory statements that it’s come to the point it is hard to believe anything he says is true.

    For example, Kennedy originally said he was not an attorney of record in any of these vaccine-related lawsuits. But we did a little homework and we found at least five cases related to the vaccine litigation that hadn’t been disclosed where Kennedy seems to be an attorney of record. That is important because what it means is that Kennedy is a lot closer to these cases than he’s revealing — cases that he and his family will be able to make bank off even as he serves as HHS Secretary. 

    The importance of this litigation can’t be overstated. Just 20 years ago, we watched vaccine makers pull their products off the market because they didn’t have protection from these kinds of lawsuits. The consequence of Kennedy’s ability to make those lawsuits easier is also the ability to shut down access and manufacturing for vaccines for every one of us. And I think that is a terrible mistake.

    Kennedy claims that he is taking on Big Pharma, but that is the lie he is peddling to hide his conflicts. I pressed him on real ways to take on the industry, including using marching-in on Big Pharma’s patents when they use taxpayer funds to bring drugs to market and then turn around and jack up prices on hardworking Americans, and by having the government negotiate prices directly with Big Pharma on behalf of Medicare beneficiaries. But Kennedy, after talking a big game about taking on Big Pharma, said no, he doesn’t support march-in rights and no, he didn’t want to commit to defending Medicare price negotiations, two proven methods to take on the drug industry and put money back into Americans’ pockets. So whose side is he on? 

    Well, one thing is for sure: RKF Jr. is on the side of his own bottom line. He has also refused to share a list of cases that he stands to benefit from. Now, I told you. He said nope, he was not attorney of record on any cases. We dug around and we found five. How many more are there? Well, here’s what Kennedy said when we said, just give us a list of the cases that you’re participating in so we can take a look at the possible conflicts. His answer? The list is so long and the conflicts so clear that, evidently, it would be more damning than what we already know. 

    Kennedy’s list of ethics issues and financial issues are a mile long—and there’s still too much that he refuses to reveal. Think about this. He’s already told us enough about his conflicts, about how he plans to keep making money, even while he was Secretary of HHS. He revealed all that right upfront. He said “Yep, I’m going to make money while I’m Secretary of HHS.” 

    And yet on basic questions like can you just give us a list of the cases that you participated in? He says, “No, I can’t do that,” which really makes you ask what on Earth is he hiding? He is dodging questions from the Senate, he is contradicting himself, and he keeps changing his answers in order to muddy the waters and really make it hard to understand what’s going on.

    Look, no one is fooled about what is happening here. Kennedy has said he’ll, “slam shut the revolving door,” between government agencies and the companies they regulate. But what he won’t agree to is cut off his own family’s steady stream of money flowing in from lawsuits that he personally can directly affect while he is Secretary of HHS. 

    Kennedy knows that these conflicts are serious. And that’s why he scrambled to update his ethics agreement and hand off his interests to his son in a desperate attempt to “fix” things.

    Video of Senator Warren’s full remarks can be found here. 

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Sen. Markey, Rep. Beyer Highlight Concerns Over DOGE Access to Nuclear Security Information

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Massachusetts Ed Markey

    Letter Text (PDF)  

    Washington (February 12, 2025) – Senator Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.) and Representative Don Beyer (VA-08), Senate and House members of the congressional Nuclear Weapons and Arms Control Working Group, wrote to Department of Energy (DOE) Secretary Chris Wright regarding their concerns that Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) has been granted access to DOE, which oversees the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) and the nation’s most sensitive nuclear weapons secrets.

    In the letter the lawmakers wrote, “According to media reports, a 23-year-old former SpaceX intern, who does not have the appropriate security clearances needed to access DOE’s IT system, received access over the objections of members of its general counsel and chief information officers. This incursion into some of the nation’s most sensitive files is the latest in a series of Trump administration moves to plant unqualified Musk and DOGE staffers throughout the federal government, some of whom have records of leaking sensitive information and potentially wreaking havoc with vital information systems.”

    The lawmakers continued, “We are deeply concerned by this disregard of DOE security protocols and the potential impacts on our nuclear security.”

    The lawmakers request that the DOE answer the following questions by February 14, 2025:

    • What is the process for granting, reviewing, and revoking security clearances for DOGE staffers at DOE?
    • Have any DOGE staffers been given access to NNSA classified nuclear weapons information, specifically Restricted Data, Formerly Restricted Data, or Critical Nuclear Weapon Design Information? If so, please provide the names of DOGE staffers, their security clearance levels, the dates their clearances were granted, and the programs or types of data these staffers accessed.
    • Under what authority and justification was each instance of classified access granted to DOGE staffers? 
    • Are DOGE staffers required to undergo training on the handling of classified information?
    • What security measures are in place to ensure DOGE staffers do not improperly access or inappropriately share sensitive nuclear secrets?
    • Have any DOGE staffers with access to classified information had significant outside financial interests, foreign contacts, or other affiliations that could pose security concerns?
    • Are NNSA employees included in the Administration’s buy-out offer for federal employees? If so, and if senior NNSA employees leave the organization, how do you plan to maintain security and secrecy of nuclear weapons and related information?

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Markey Joins Bicameral Legislation to Protect Immigrant Access to Essential Service Locations

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Massachusetts Ed Markey

    Washington (February 11, 2025) – Senator Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.) today joined Senator Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) and Representative Adriano Espaillat (D-NY) in introducing the bicameral Protecting Sensitive Locations Act to codify protections for immigrants seeking essential service at locations like hospitals, schools, and courthouses. The legislation would prevent immigration enforcement officers from taking enforcement actions at sensitive locations. The Protecting Sensitive Locations Act codifies the Department of Homeland Security’s long-standing policies that have been recently rescinded by President Trump and expands on those policies to ensure that immigrants are able to access education, criminal justice, and social services without fear of deportation.

    The list of “sensitive locations” protected under this legislation includes, but are not limited to: medical treatment facilities and health care facilities of all types; public and private schools, early childhood learning centers, preschools, scholastic activities, and field trips; places of worship; federal and local courthouses; DMVs and social security offices; polling places; labor union halls; and several other locations which provide essential or emergency services to immigrant communities, such as rape crisis centers and homeless shelters.

    The Protecting Sensitive Locations Act is cosponsored in theSenate by Senators Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), Cory Booker (D-N.J.), Catherine Cortez Masto (D-Nev.), Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), Patty Murray (D-Wash.), Alex Padilla (D-Calif.), Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), John Hickenlooper (D-Colo.), Jacky Rosen (D-Nev.), Tammy Duckworth (D-Ill.), Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Mazie K. Hirono (D-Hawaii), Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii), Peter Welch (D-Vt.), Raphael Warnock (D-Ga.), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), Tina Smith (D-Minn.), and Michael Bennet (D-Colo.).

    The legislation is co-led in the House of Representatives by Representatives Sylvia Garcia (TX-29), Suzanne Bonamici (OR-01), Jesús “Chuy” García (IL-04), Pramila Jayapal (WA-07), Don Beyer (VA-08), Delia C. Ramirez (IL-03), and Jasmine Crockett (TX-30).

    The legislation is endorsed by over 580 organizations, including Center for Law and Social Policy (CLASP) and the American Federation of Teachers (AFT).

    “The Trump Administration’s reckless rescission of the protected areas policy is part of an effort to create a chilling effect, deterring parents from carrying out essential activities such as taking a child to school or a doctor’s appointment,” said Wendy Cervantes, Director of Immigration and Immigrant Families as CLASP. “Leaving it up to immigration enforcement agents to use “common sense” has proven misguided in the past, with our own research documenting immigration enforcement actions in child care parking lots. We support the Protecting Sensitive Locations Act because we believe that keeping locations critical to children and families safe from immigration enforcement supports the well-being of immigrant families, as well as the security and stability of entire communities.”

    “The Trump administration’s memo allowing ICE agents to enter schools and hospitals is an immediate threat to the well-being of our children and communities. All children.  It will cause irreparable harm, indelibly scarring not only immigrant families, but all families. We immediately asked the new President to reverse this. He has not. We need an act of Congress, that is why we wholeheartedly support the legislation introduced by Rep. Espaillat to reverse it. Schools and hospitals are supposed to be safe and welcoming places. We urge Congress to quickly pass the Protecting Sensitive Locations Act to reverse a policy that is both cruel and un-American,” said Randi Weingarten, President, AFT.

    The full list of endorsing organizations can be found here.

    The full text of the bill can be found here.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Markey, Warren, Schumer Demand: Hands Off Medicare and Medicaid

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Massachusetts Ed Markey

    Letter Text (PDF)

    Washington (February 12, 2025) – Senator Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.), top Democrat on the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Subcommittee on Primary Health and Retirement Security, and Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) today wrote to President Donald Trump demanding the Trump administration, Elon Musk, and the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) make no cuts to Medicare and Medicaid to pay for tax cuts for billionaires. This follows reports of Elon Musk and DOGE officials gained access to key payment and contracting systems at the Centers for Medicaid & Medicare Services (CMS). CMS administers Medicare and Medicaid. In 2024, 68 million seniors and people with disabilities seniors relied on Medicare coverage for essential health care, including hospital visits, screenings for cancer, diabetes, and depression, and prescription drugs. Nearly 80 million Americans relied on Medicaid, making it the largest public health insurance program in the United States.

    In the letter the lawmakers wrote, “We write to say no to Elon Musk and DOGE, and demand hands off Medicare or Medicaid. We strongly oppose any efforts by Musk – or anyone else in your administration – cutting or damaging these vital programs. Medicare and Medicaid must not be raided to pay for tax cuts for billionaires. Every cut risks Americans paying more, waiting longer, and wading through more insurance red tape for care. Every cut risks hospitals and community health centers struggling harder to keep their doors open and forcing health providers and workers out of their jobs. 

    The lawmakers continued, “We continue to fight for a health care system that works better for all Americans, so they experience lower costs, shorter wait times, and receive better care. But your Administration, Elon Musk, and DOGE have already made that harder. Your Administration is already responsible for the shut-down of Medicaid portals across all 50 states, disruptions to vital health care communication, closures of community health centers, and significant delays in funding for life-saving health research. Cuts to Medicare and Medicaid will only serve to deepen the harm.”

    The lawmakers urged, “It is dangerously unacceptable that an unelected Musk and his unqualified acolytes have access to sensitive CMS systems and are ready to bypass Congress to make life and death decisions affecting millions of Americans. No one asked for this lawless approach to our critical government health care systems. We urge you to stop this threat to Americans’ health care, now.”

    The letter is signed by Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), and Senators Angela Alsobrooks (D-Md.), Tammy Baldwin (D-Wisc.), Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), Lisa Blunt Rochester (D-Del.), Cory Booker (D-N.J.), Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.), Chris Coons (D-Del.), Tammy Duckworth (D-Ill.), Richard Durbin (D-Ill.), Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.), Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.), Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii), Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.), Andy Kim (D-N.J.), Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.), Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), Chris Murphy (D-Conn.), Alex Padilla (D-Calif.), Jack Reed (D-R.I.), Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.), Tina Smith (D-Minn.), Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), Raphael Warnock (D-Ga.), Peter Welch (D-Vt.), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), and Ron Wyden (D-Ore.). 

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: ICYMI: Ahead of Senate Confirmation Vote, Markey Blasts RFK Jr.’s Nomination for Secretary of HHS, Warns of Dangerous Views and Impact on American Public Health

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Massachusetts Ed Markey

    Watch: Senator Markey Slams RFK Jr.’s Nomination to Run HHS

    Washington (February 12, 2025) – Senator Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.), ranking member of the Health Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) Subcommittee on Primary Health and Retirement Security, today delivered remarks on the floor of the Senate, objecting to the confirmation of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to serve as Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services. Below is an excerpt from his remarks.

    “When Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. was asked about Medicare and Medicaid, he could not answer the most basic questions, demonstrating that he would be at HHS only to make whatever cuts Trump, Musk, and DOGE dictate at the expense of the American people. Now, he is in line to be the number one health official in the United States. This would be a disaster. Mr. Kennedy has reportedly given reassurances on his position on vaccines, or on his position on food and chronic disease.  

    “To my colleagues, I would say this: We cannot address chronic disease if we are slashing Medicare, Medicaid, and the Affordable Care Act or recklessly cutting off funding from hospitals and community health centers. If we are battling vaccine misinformation, it will make it much more difficult to take on chronic disease like heart disease or diabetes. The long-term impact of food on children’s health doesn’t matter if children are dying from preventable, infectious disease because they believed misinformation spread by our nominee for Secretary of Health and Human Services.  

    “And even with the promises he has made on vaccine misinformation, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has not demonstrated that he will fulfill his promises. He has used his position to lead people down the dangerous path of vaccine misinformation, and when asked about his role in the Samoa outbreak, he lied.  

    “I have received over 1,000 calls and emails to my office opposing his nomination and received letters from over 18,000 physicians – including thousands of pediatricians, internal medicine, and emergency medicine doctors – representing all 50 states and Puerto Rico. They expressed concern and dismay about having a Secretary of Health and Human Services that doesn’t believe in vaccines that save lives.

    “The stakes are too high to take a risk on this nominee.”  

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Markey, Warren Slam Trump Administration for Causing “Chaos and Upheaval” at Massachusetts Research Institutions, Demand Answers from NIH and NSF

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Massachusetts Ed Markey

    “Trump Administration actions are endangering life-saving research and economic growth in Massachusetts and across the country.”

    “The chaos caused by the Trump administration is unacceptable—and you owe researchers and patients in Massachusetts and beyond an explanation about what is going on at your agencies.” 

    Text of Letter (PDF) 

    Washington (February 12, 2025) – Senators Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.), and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) today wrote to the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the National Science Foundation (NSF) with concerns about the ongoing Trump Administration funding cuts at Massachusetts research institutions. 

    The NIH and NSF are the largest public funders of research in the United States — fueling the development of lifesaving treatments for diseases like cancer, heart disease, and diabetes, tools for the early detection of Alzheimer’s disease, and more. This funding is particularly indispensable in Massachusetts, where dozens of world-renowned universities, hospitals, and research institutions rely on NIH and NSF grants to support cutting-edge research that benefits the U.S. economy and patients around the world.

    Within days of taking office, the Trump Administration called for an immediate pause on all public communications from HHS, NIH’s parent organization, and one week later, paused all activities related to the disbursement of funds. This pause was blocked by a federal judge, but the Trump administration has refused to fully comply with the order to unfreeze funds. 

    On February 7, the NIH announced that all new and existing research awards would face major cuts, due to reduction in the “indirect cost rate.” Following a legal challenge by 22 state attorneys general, led by Massachusetts Attorney General Campbell, a federal judge issued a temporary order blocking the cut within those states. Still, researchers, students, and institutions are facing huge budget cuts and continued uncertainty.

    These “Trump Administration actions are endangering life-saving research and economic growth in Massachusetts and across the country,” wrote the lawmakers. 

    “The chaos caused by the Trump administration is unacceptable—and you owe researchers and patients in Massachusetts and beyond an explanation about what is going on at your agencies,” continued the lawmakers.

    The Senators’ offices conducted interviews with institutions who are among the top recipients of NIH and NSF funding in Massachusetts about the impact these cuts would have on researchers’ projects, careers, and on the local economy. These interviews revealed that: 

    1. The funding freezes and cuts at NIH and NSF have caused chaos and confusion at Massachusetts research institutions. Representatives at Massachusetts research institutions described a “hunger for clear guidance on what is impacted and what isn’t” as investigators scramble to save their work and plan for the years and months ahead. They are concerned about existing grants being clawed back, afraid to ask for clarification for fear they’ll have a “target on their back,” and in some instances even unable to “buy a book or a pencil.” 
    2. The funding cut offs are impeding research carried out by Massachusetts institutions that enable critical, lifesaving care. NIH and NSF funding saves Americans’ lives by sponsoring life-saving clinical trials, many of which are conducted at Massachusetts institutions. Thus, for some, the consequences of the funding pauses could be life or death: “if you’re a cancer patient in a clinical trial, it is not a theoretical undertaking, it is treatment.” 
    3. Federal funding disruptions at Massachusetts institutions puts the future of a highly skilled STEM workforce at risk.Nearly half of all science and engineering doctoral recipients graduating from U.S. research institutions have received federal research funding during their graduate studies. According to conversations with Massachusetts research institution representatives, “higher education is a big industry in Massachusetts, we’re training the workforce at every level;” pulling back this funding risks “a situation where you can only earn a PhD if you’re already wealthy.” 
    4. Freezes and cuts in federal research funding at Massachusetts institutions will be a critical hit to the innovation that has cemented the United States as a vanguard in healthcare.Massachusetts scientists are using NIH grants to create new cancer drugs; develop new technologies—like the bionic pancreas—to treat disease; study ways to combat the opioid epidemic; and identify risk factors for heart disease, among other critical endeavors. As representatives from Massachusetts-based research institutions said, “if anyone in the world has a serious disease and they want to come to the US – they want to come to Boston.” 
    5. Federal funding disruptions will harm the Massachusetts and United States economies.The NIH is the largest single public funder of biomedical and behavioral research in the world, and in fiscal year 2023 NIH funding generated over $90 billion in economic activity in the United States. In Massachusetts along that same year, the NIH awarded $3.5 billion in grants in contracts that directly supported 28,842 jobs and nearly $7.5 billion in economic activity. 

    “The unprecedented actions taken by the Trump Administration will undermine the United States’ research edge—whether through abandoned research projects, staffing shortages, or a “brain drain” in our biotech workforce as young, budding scientists opt for other careers and countries with greater certainty,” concluded the lawmakers

    The Senators urged the agencies to end the funding freeze and threats to cut grant expenditures and provide clarity on their directive-issuing processes and the rationale behind the indirect cost cap reduction by February 26, 2025. In 2017, following President Trump’s budget proposal seeking massive cuts to the NIH, Senator Warren released a report detailing the importance of NIH funding to Massachusetts. 

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Cantwell Votes NO On Advancing RFK Jr. for HHS Secretary: “The Kind Of Research We’re Talking About Here Is The Kind That Saves Lives”

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Washington Maria Cantwell

    02.12.25

    Cantwell Votes NO On Advancing RFK Jr. for HHS Secretary: “The Kind Of Research We’re Talking About Here Is The Kind That Saves Lives”

    In Senate floor speech, says RFK Jr.’s anti-science views put U.S. medical innovation leadership at risk; would hinder response to health crises like avian flu; Trump Administration plans to slash NIH funding put lifesaving research – and 12k jobs – in WA state at risk

    WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, U.S. Senator Maria Cantwell (D-WA), a senior member of the Senate Finance Committee and ranking member of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, voted against closing debate on Robert F. Kennedy Jr. – President Trump’s nominee to serve as Secretary of Health and Human Services – and advancing toward his final confirmation vote.

    In a speech delivered on the Senate floor, Sen. Cantwell urged her colleagues to follow suit, cautioning that “President Trump’s nominee would get us stuck in conspiracy theories that would cost us lives.”

    “Now we are at the possibility of the beginning of another crisis, the avian flu. This crisis is yet another reminder of the importance of medical research and collaboration,” Sen. Cantwell said. “Does it make sense to cut science at the time we might have another pandemic? Does it make sense to continue to cut the collaborative efforts of research?”

    “My state is a global leader in medical innovation. From research, to biotech, to getting drugs to the market — in 2023 the National Institutes of Health awarded $1.2 billion in highly competitive grants to 65 different organizations in the State of Washington. This supported about 12,000 jobs and generated close to $3 billion in economic activity. So yes, we know a little something about global health and innovation,” Sen. Cantwell continued. “The kind of research we’re talking about here is the kind that saves lives. And this, ultimately, is about making an investment in saving the lives of people.”

    The Senate ultimately voted to invoke cloture on RFK Jr.’s nomination, 53-47. His final confirmation vote is currently scheduled for tomorrow morning.

    Last week, Sen. Cantwell voted no on advancing RFK Jr.’s nomination out of the Senate Finance Committee, citing his waffling on the safety of vaccines. Her no vote followed a committee hearing in January, when Sen. Cantwell grilled him on his anti-science and anti-vaccine views, and his promise to cut 600 employees from the National Institutes of Health.

    For decades, Sen. Cantwell has remained a staunch supporter of medical innovation and evidence-based science, including treatments for fentanyl addiction, abortion, vaccinations, stem cell research, and more.

    Video of Sen. Cantwell’s speech on the Senate floor today is available HERE, audio HERE, and transcript HERE.



    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Chairman Capito Questions CCUS Leaders on USE IT Act Implementation, CCUS Project Permitting

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for West Virginia Shelley Moore Capito

    [embedded content]

    To watch Chairman Capito’s questions, click here or the image above.

    WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, U.S. Senator Shelley Moore Capito (R-W.Va.), Chairman of the Senate Environment and Public Works (EPW) Committee, led a hearing on advancing carbon capture, utilization, and sequestration (CCUS) technologies, and examining the implementation of the Utilizing Significant Emissions with Innovative Technologies Act or USE IT Act.

    During the hearing, Chairman Capito questioned Kevin Connors, Assistant Director for Regulatory Compliance and Energy Policy at the Energy and Environmental Research Center; Dan Yates, Executive Director of the Ground Water Protection Council; and Jack Andreasen Cavanaugh, Manager of Carbon Management, U.S. Policy and Advocacy at Breakthrough Energy. In her questions, Chairman Capito asked about the pace of USE IT Act implementation, how to improve the permitting process for CCUS projects, and the importance of bipartisanship in these efforts. 

    HIGHLIGHTS:

    USE IT ACT TASK FORCES: “The USE IT Act was signed in 2020. I also alluded to the two CCUS Permitting Task Forces that have been established, one for federal lands, and one for non-federal lands. I’m interested to know…now that these Task Forces have been chartered and are operating, do you believe that will make an impact on identifying opportunities to improve the permitting, through these Task Forces, as the law requires?”

    NEED FOR RELIABLE ENERGY: “We have a repeating theme here, and I mentioned it in my in my opening statement of the reliabilities, because not only is this an intensive process, the process we see on AI and other things are putting great pressures on our potential for providing electricity for all of this.”

    PERMITTING IS KEY: “The key to all of this, and it’s not the only key, but it’s the key to every one of these projects, is a permitting process that you can move along. You can’t permit a nuclear plant, you can’t permit a pipeline, you can’t permit a transmission line. You’re sort of, at every point of the project, all hands point to permitting, and so any help that you can give us with permitting, Class VI, and those pipelines, I think, will cross benefit all projects.”

    IMPORTANCE OF BIPARTISANSHIP FOR PERMITTING AND CCUS: “As Senator Whitehouse said, this is going to be a bipartisan push. It’s the only way to do it effectively, to get it into legislation, because we see what happens with the regulatory environment, as the shifts of Administrations go from one to the other at the federal level.”

    Click HERE to watch Chairman Capito’s opening statement.

    Click HERE to watch Chairman Capito’s questions.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Barrasso Bill Ends Electric Vehicle Tax Credits

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Wyoming John Barrasso

    WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, U.S. Senator John Barrasso (R-Wyo.), Senate Majority Whip, introduced legislation to end the federal electric vehicle and charging stations tax credit. This legislation stops taxpayer money from subsidizing luxury electric vehicle for high-income individuals and corporations.

    The Eliminating Lavish Incentives to Electric (ELITE) Vehicles Act (S. 541) specifically repeals the $7,500 tax credit for new electric vehicles (EVs), eliminates the tax credit for purchasing used EVs, wipes out the federal investment tax credit for electric vehicle charging stations, and closes the “leasing loophole” that has allowed certain taxpayers and foreign entities to evade restrictions on EV incentives. It also stops China from exploiting loopholes and circumventing guardrails to access U.S. tax credits associated with electric vehicles.

    “The hard-earned money of taxpaying Americans should not cover the cost for the luxuries of the nation’s elite. Nor should we be allowing China to infiltrate our markets and undermine our supply chain,” said Senator Barrasso. “Repealing these reckless tax credits from the Biden administration once and for all will stop Washington from giving handouts to our adversaries and high-income individuals. Wyoming families should not foot the bill for expensive electric cars they don’t want and can’t afford.”

    “American taxpayers should not have to foot the bill for the Biden administration’s sweeping windfall for electric vehicles,” said Leader Thune. “I’m proud to join Sen. Barrasso in this effort to end the exorbitant tax burden that was placed on American households to fuel a reckless and unrealistic environmental agenda.”

    Co-sponsors of this legislation include Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.), U.S. Senators James Lankford (R-Okla.), Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.), Kevin Cramer (R-N.D.), Tom Cotton (R-Ark.), Shelley Moore Capito (R-W.Va.), Tim Sheehy (R-Mont.), Pete Ricketts (R-Neb.), Joni Ernst (R-Iowa), Bill Cassidy (R-La.), Roger Marshall (R-Kans.), Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), John Hoeven (R-N.D.), and Rick Scott (R-Fla.).

    This legislation is supported by the American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers, Americans for Prosperity, National Taxpayers Union, and Heritage Action.

    “The EV tax credit was always supposed to sunset, so Senator Barrasso is absolutely right to say, ‘enough is enough’ for taxpayers. After more than a decade of subsidies worth billions of dollars, it’s time for EVs to compete on a level playing field.” – Chet Thompson, President and CEO, American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers (AFPM)

    “Americans are hurting after four years of failed energy policy under former President Joe Biden. The last thing American families and small businesses should be subsidizing is electric vehicles that few can afford. Now is the time for electric vehicles to compete in the open marketplace, responsive to the needs and desires of the consumer. Forcing electric vehicles on the American people has failed and costs domestic auto manufacturers billions, resulting in fewer affordable vehicle options and economic distortion. We applaud Senator Barrasso for reintroducing the Eliminate Lavish Incentives to Electric (ELITE) Vehicles Act to rid the marketplace of government cronyism and favoritism and we look forward to this legislation moving to the Floor.” – Brent Gardner, Chief Government Affairs Officer, Americans for Prosperity

    Full text of the legislation can be found here.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Murphy, Connecticut Delegation Call On Acting HHS Secretary To Address Impact Of Trump Funding Chaos On Community Health Centers

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Connecticut – Chris Murphy

    February 12, 2025

    WASHINGTON–U.S. Senator Chris Murphy (D-Conn.), a member of the U.S. Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee, U.S. Senator Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), and U.S. Representatives John Larson (D-Conn.-01), Joe Courtney (D-Conn.-02), Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.-03), Jim Himes (D-Conn.-04), and Jahana Hayes (D-Conn.-05) sent a letter urging the Acting Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Dr. Dorothy Fink, to address disruptions in Community Health Center funding caused by the White House’s recent Executive Orders. With over 440,000 Connecticut residents relying on these centers for essential care, health center leaders warn that ongoing payment and communication issues have caused panic among staff and patients, jeopardizing critical services like cancer detection and children’s medicine.

    “In Connecticut and across the country, health centers are a lifeline for vulnerable populations,” the members wrote. “1 in 8 Connecticut residents rely on health centers. These are often people with nowhere else to turn. 60% of health center patients in Connecticut are on Medicaid, while 16% are uninsured and 68% of these patients are below the federal poverty level. A threat to health center funding and operations is a threat to the health of our most vulnerable patients in Connecticut.”

    The members warned that funding disruptions may leave Connecticut’s health centers vulnerable to devastating service cuts, closures, and layoffs: “Health centers depend on federal funds to serve vulnerable populations. Most Connecticut health centers have only 57 days of cash on hand and would have to cut services and staff within two weeks of funding disruptions. For these reasons, the actions of the Trump Administration have put these health centers at risk. Since late January, following the announcement of the funding freeze, Connecticut health centers have experienced lock outs from the Payment Management System (PMS) where they normally draw down funds, experienced significant delays in receiving funds they are entitled to and undergone unusual review processes to ultimately access those funds. These disruptions have continued even following a judge’s court order blocking the funding freeze and have resulted in at least one center unsure if it can make its next payroll. In addition to disruptions in payments, centers have noted an inability to get feedback from normal communication channels with HRSA and the Electronic Handbooks (EHBs) system being inaccessible.”

    They continued: “Health center leaders in Connecticut say that they are experiencing unprecedented panic from both staff and patients, who are unclear whether funds can be drawn down for services like cancer detection and early childhood development due to recent the Executive Orders. Additionally, patients are unsure whether they will be served and are cancelling appointments, which will compromise their health and lead to more emergency room visits down the line.”

    The full text of the letter is available HERE and below:

    Dear Acting Secretary Fink,

    We are writing on behalf of the over 440,000 people in Connecticut who receive medical, dental, or behavioral health services at a Community Health Center (health center). As a result of the President’s Executive orders on January 20, 2025, as well as the subsequent guidance from the Office of Management and Budget, the health centers are continuing to experience disruptions in payment and communications that have already impacted services and will be catastrophic soon if not remediated.

    The goal of health centers is to provide primary and preventative care to patients, regardless of their ability to pay. In Connecticut and across the country, health centers are a lifeline for vulnerable populations. 1 in 8 Connecticut residents rely on health centers. These are often people with nowhere else to turn. 60% of health center patients in Connecticut are on Medicaid, while 16% are uninsured and 68% of these patients are below the federal poverty level. A threat to health center funding and operations is a threat to the health of our most vulnerable patients in Connecticut.

    Health centers depend on federal funds to serve vulnerable populations. Most Connecticut health centers have only 57 days of cash on hand and would have to cut services and staff within two weeks of funding disruptions. For these reasons, the actions of the Trump Administration have put these health centers at risk. Since late January, following the announcement of the funding freeze, Connecticut health centers have experienced lock outs from the Payment Management System (PMS) where they normally draw down funds, experienced significant delays in receiving funds they are entitled to and undergone unusual review processes to ultimately access those funds. These disruptions have continued even following a judge’s court order blocking the funding freeze and have resulted in at least one center unsure if it can make its next payroll. In addition to disruptions in payments, centers have noted an inability to get feedback from normal communication channels with HRSA and the Electronic Handbooks (EHBs) system being inaccessible.

    Health center leaders in Connecticut say that they are experiencing unprecedented panic from both staff and patients, who are unclear whether funds can be drawn down for services like cancer detection and early childhood development due to recent the Executive Orders. Additionally, patients are unsure whether they will be served and are cancelling appointments, which will compromise their health and lead to more emergency room visits down the line. Given these impactful disruptions and the stress on our health centers, we request answers to the following questions by no later than February 14, 2025:

    1. What is the average time for submission of draw-down requests and receiving funding in PMS?
      1. How has that number changed between January 1, 2024, and the present?
      2. How has that number changed, daily, since January 27, 2025?
    2. How many health center draw-down requests have been denied since January 27, 2025?
      1. What is the rationale for these denials?
    3. Please list all disruptions of HRSA systems that could impact health centers, the length of these disruptions and the cause of these disruptions.
    4. What specific authority and under which executive action did HRSA or the Department of Health and Human Services use to restrict health center access to the PMS and funding that they had been previously awarded?
    5. Please provide a list of regular standing calls or meetings between HRSA staff and HRSA grantees that have been cancelled since January 20, 2025.
    6. Please outline a plan of communication to respond to future disruptions.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: RI Delegation Demands Answers from Trump’s Pick to Lead Commerce About DOGE Storming NOAA & Attempting to Downsize the Agency’s Critical Capabilities

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Rhode Island Jack Reed

    WASHINGTON, DC – U.S. Senators Jack Reed and Sheldon Whitehouse along with Congressmen Seth Magaziner and Gabe Amo today sent a letter to President Trump’s pick to lead the U.S. Department of Commerce, demanding answers about the Trump Administration’s ongoing efforts to drastically reduce the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA) workforce and budget. 

    NOAA is a critical federal agency charged with researching ocean systems, marine life, and the Earth’s climate; forecasting weather; monitoring atmospheric conditions; and mapping the seas; among other critical tasks.  The federal agency has its own fleet of research and survey vessels and specialized aircraft, operated by a combination of NOAA Corps officers and civilians.

    “We write to express concern about ongoing efforts to drastically reduce the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA) workforce and budget.  These actions have severe consequences for Rhode Island and the nation, undermining NOAA’s ability to fulfill its vital mission of safeguarding our economy, environment, and national security,” Rhode Island’s Congressional delegation wrote to Howard Lutnick, who Trump picked to run the Commerce Department.

    The U.S. Senate is preparing to vote in the coming days on Mr. Lutnick’s nomination.  During his confirmation before the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, Mr. Lutnick verbally pledged not to try and dismantle NOAA or break up and privatize the agency.  However, he then backtracked on that sentiment in his written responses to the committees questions: “During your January 29, 2025, nomination hearing before the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, when asked if you agreed about a Project 2025 proposal suggesting NOAA should be dismantled, many of its functions eliminated, sent to other agencies, privatized, or placed under the control of states and territories, you responded with a simple: “No.”  However, when asked for the record whether NOAA should be dismantled, you wrote: “It is premature to discuss any specific recommendations,” the four members of Rhode Island’s Congressional delegation wrote. 

    Recent press reports indicate that the Trump Administration is already taking steps to downsize and degrade NOAA’s ability to carry out its core missions and that staffers from the so-called DOGE task force have already entered NOAA facilities, locked out career staff, and demanded access to sensitive information technology systems.

    “We are alarmed by recent reports that staffers from the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) have been given access to NOAA’s offices and that NOAA employees have been told to expect a 50% reduction in staff and budget cuts of 30%.  If carried out, these threats will have real impacts for our constituents – undermining NOAA’s ability to provide accurate, timely, and free weather forecasts, putting lives at risk during hurricanes and other severe weather events, and have ripple effects on national defense, emergency response, and economic stability,” the four lawmakers wrote.

    NOAA has a strong presence in Rhode Island, thanks in part to Senator Reed’s successful effort to bring Marine Operations Center – Atlantic (MOC-A) to Naval Station Newport.  Construction of the $150 million shoreside NOAA hub and complimentary pier infrastructure has been underway for over a year and is expected to be completed in 2027.

    The delegation’s letter also notes that NOAA services play a critical role in coastal and marine research, fisheries management, weather forecasting, and climate monitoring.  These services are particularly important in Rhode Island, where the Blue Economy is a major driver of jobs and economic growth. 

    Full text of the letter follows:

    February 11, 2025

    The Honorable Howard Lutnick

    Chairman and CEO 

    Cantor Fitzgerald, L.P.

    110 East 59th Street

    New York, NY 10022

    Dear Mr. Lutnick:

    We write to express concern about ongoing efforts to drastically reduce the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA) workforce and budget.  These actions have severe consequences for Rhode Island and the nation, undermining NOAA’s ability to fulfill its vital mission of safeguarding our economy, environment, and national security.

    NOAA services play a critical role in coastal and marine research, fisheries management, weather forecasting, and climate monitoring.  These services are particularly important in Rhode Island, where the blue economy is a major driver of jobs and economic growth.  Further, NOAA’s aviation weather services are critical for air travel safety, and its oceanographic research supports the U.S. Navy and Coast Guard in ensuring maritime security, detecting underwater threats, and advancing strategic ocean intelligence.  

    We are alarmed by recent reports that staffers from the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) have been given access to NOAA’s offices and that NOAA employees have been told to expect a 50% reduction in staff and budget cuts of 30%.  If carried out, these threats will have real impacts for our constituents – undermining NOAA’s ability to provide accurate, timely, and free weather forecasts, putting lives at risk during hurricanes and other severe weather events, and have ripple effects on national defense, emergency response, and economic stability.

    During your January 29, 2025, nomination hearing before the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, when asked if you agreed about a Project 2025 proposal suggesting NOAA should be dismantled, many of its functions eliminated, sent to other agencies, privatized, or placed under the control of states and territories, you responded with a simple: “No.”  However, when asked for the record whether NOAA should be dismantled, you wrote: “It is premature to discuss any specific recommendations.”  

    In order to fully understand your plans and objectives if confirmed as Secretary of Commerce, we ask that you clarify your response to these critical questions and how, if confirmed as Secretary, you would uphold NOAA’s congressionally-mandated service.

    Thank you in advance for your attention to this important matter.  We look forward to your prompt response.

    Sincerely,

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Reed Seeks to Strengthen RI’s Capacity to Combat Wildfires

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Rhode Island Jack Reed

    PROVIDENCE, RI — In an effort to strengthen Rhode Island’s capacity to respond to wildfires, U.S. Senator Jack Reed helped deliver $306,457 in federal wildfire response funding to Rhode Island last year.  These federal funds may be used by the state to suppress and contain wildfires, improve and expand training, and employ prescribed burns as a tool to reduce the risk of wildfires.

    This month, the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management’s (DEM) Forest Fire Program announced it will be offering a free, five-day, entry level course to train participants in the tools, tactics, and strategies used to suppress uncontrolled wildland fires. No prior experience in firefighting is needed to attend, but applicants must be at least 18 years of age.  The classes will be held in June and priority enrollment will be given to local municipal firefighters and DEM employees.  Registration is open through the end of the month.

    According to DEM, Rhode Island experienced a total of 75 wildfires last year, with the majority occurring in the fall between mid-October and mid-November.  DEM says wildfires are expected to become more frequent as climate change continues to create warmer, drier conditions, leading to longer and more active fire seasons. 

    “I commend DEM for their outstanding efforts to help safeguard our communities from the threat of wildfires and improve forest resiliency.  I am pleased to help provide the resources the state needs to prevent destructive blazes and protect lives, livelihoods, and property from the growing threat of uncontrolled brushfires and wildfires.  DEM is putting federal funds to work investing in equipment and expanding their outreach and training to help lower wildfire risks and increase the effectiveness of wild firefighting tools and strategies,” said Senator Reed, a member of the Appropriations Committee, which oversees federal funding for the U.S. Forest Service.

    Last year, DEM’s Forest Fire Program reported treating: “130 acres of state property with prescribed fire, nearly a threefold increase from 2023. Last year, DEM conducted shaded fuel break brush clearing projects along various stretches of forestland on state lands to lessen the risk of uncontrolled wildfires. DEM has trained 46 new wildland firefighters in the past two years to help build RI’s capacity to respond to wildfires.   DEM has trained 46 new wildland firefighters in the past two years to help build RI’s capacity to respond to wildfires.”

    Last year, DEM’s Fire Program received $132,561 in federal funding from the U.S. Forest Service for State Fire Capacity activities: These funds are allocated for salary, benefits, overtime (for training, prescribed fire and response etc.); and associated operating expenses for personnel assigned to the Fire Program.  The state also got an additional $38,896 to boost its Volunteer Fire Capacity to help purchase equipment and provide fire training for volunteer firefighters.  Reed also helped direct another $135,000 to Rhode Island last year under the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law for the state’s Fire Program to purchase specialized firefighting equipment and a mini excavator used to fight wildfires.

    Senator Reed helped pass both the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (P.L. 117-58) and the Inflation Reduction Act (P.L. 117-169) which together included over $7 billion in funding across federal interagency to enhance America’s ability to mitigate and respond to wildfires nationwide,

    The Trump Administration has put a freeze on federal funding and Congressional Republicans are threatening to claw back unspent funds under the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law and the Inflation Reduction Act.  Senate Democrats have also decried the Trump Administration halting the disbursement of funds for forest management and restoration projects, as well as the universal hiring freeze for federal personnel, including permanent and seasonal firefighters.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: On Senate Floor, Shaheen Speaks Out Against the Confirmation of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. for Health and Human Services Secretary

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for New Hampshire Jeanne Shaheen

    (Washington, DC) – Today, U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH) delivered remarks on the floor of the U.S. Senate to oppose the confirmation of Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., for Health and Human Services Secretary. In her remarks, Shaheen highlighted Kennedy’s troubling record of promoting conspiracy theories that put lives at risk, supporting efforts to defund critical public health programs and denying scientific consensus on public health. You can watch her speech in full here. 

    Key Quotes: 

    • “We should be taking steps right now to lower costs for families and children. Half of uninsured Granite Staters cite cost as their reason for not purchasing health coverage. More than two-thirds of [uninsured] people in New Hampshire have delayed care and another 25 percent have delayed buying needed prescriptions or said they have to ration their meds.” 
    • “This decision by the Trump Administration [to cut NIH funding] will cut Dartmouth’s funding by $38 million and we don’t know what future impact that would be. Will we miss the next cure for a pediatric cancer? Will we fail to advance treatments in Alzheimer’s? What we do know is that […] the job loss [and] the economic impact that will result from this decision will be devastating.”   
    • “Women in this country need to know that the Secretary of Health and Human Services will defend our rights to access all the health care we need. But at every turn, Republicans and the Trump Administration have pushed forward dangerous policies intended to threaten access to full reproductive care.” 
    • “America deserves a leader at HHS who values science, who protects public health, who defends women’s rights to reproductive care—to the full range of reproductive care—and who upholds the integrity of our country’s core health systems. RFK Jr. has shown time and again that he is not that leader. His dangerous rhetoric on vaccines, his reckless plans to gut critical agencies and lack of understanding of basic health care make him uniquely unqualified to advance the well-being of all Americans.”  

    Full Remarks as Delivered: 

    ???  

    Mr. President. I come to the floor to join my colleagues with a great deal of concern to discuss the Trump Administration’s nomination of Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., to be the next Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services. 

    To put it very simply at the outset, Robert F. Kennedy—RFK Jr.—is unfit to lead the highest health office in our nation.  

    First of all, RFK has no—let me repeat, no—health or medical experience.  

    That in it of itself should be a red flag on this nominee who is supposed to be tasked with leading our nation’s health agency. 

    But sadly, that’s not where the red flags end. 

    From his radical and dangerous opinions on vaccines and public health, to his promises to cut medical research to his ever-changing position on women’s rights to access reproductive health care, he has proven that he lacks the credibility, the knowledge and the capability to be Secretary of Health and Human Services.  

    So, let’s take a step back.  

    When the President ran his campaign, he ran a campaign on lowering costs for working Americans. Well, where has that promise gone?  

    We saw today that inflation has gone up in the last quarter. It’s over 3 percent now. 

    And we’ve seen nothing from President Trump’s first weeks in office that addresses the high costs of health care, of food, of housing, of child care.  

    Two weeks ago, this Administration, including the Health and Human Services agency, halted funding across the board for programs like our community health centers and substance use treatment programs.  

    These centers are often the main source of health care for their community. They serve the people across the states of this country. 

    In our office, I heard from programs like Coos County Family Heath, a community health center that provides life-saving care to rural patients across the North Country of New Hampshire—what we call the North Country. 

    Their programs for training new doctors and providing services for victims of domestic violence were, and still are, at risk thanks to Trump’s executive orders and funding freeze.  

    And I heard from Navigating Recovery in Laconia, that’s a substance use treatment service that depends on federal funding for more than 50 percent of its budget. They’re worried about keeping their doors open.  

    And this is an organization with providers who will literally sit with a patient by their hospital bed following an overdose to make sure they’re getting the best guidance, the best treatment and the follow on services like housing and child care that allows them to start their recovery. 

    And this is a real issue for us in New Hampshire, where we’ve been hit very hard by the opioid epidemic. 

    The Trump executive orders and funding cuts will force Navigating Recovery to lay off staff and to curtail services should those funding cuts continue. 

    These are actions on the part of the White House that don’t lower costs for families – they do just the opposite. 

    They put people out of work and weaken our ability to care for our most vulnerable populations.  

    But when he was asked if he would reverse this policy, of cutting funding for programs like substance use recovery, RFK refused.  

    The thing is, we should be taking steps right now to lower costs for families and children.  

    Half of uninsured Granite Staters cite cost as their reason for not purchasing health coverage.   

    More than two-thirds of [uninsured] people in New Hampshire have delayed care, and another 25 percent have delayed buying needed prescriptions or said they have to ration their meds.   

    We could help these people right now.  

    We could pass the Health Care Affordability Act, which would make permanent premium tax credits in the Affordable Care Act that have cut health care costs for 24 million Americans—nearly 70,000 from New Hampshire. 

    Passing that bill would directly help constituents like the man in Newmarket who contacted our office. 

    He’s 55 years old, he’s a patient at Lamprey Health Care, which is a community health center.  

    He had been uninsured and avoided going to a doctor his whole life.  

    But sadly, he was recently hospitalized for 10 days because of complications from untreated diabetes. He had sepsis and he had an infection in his foot.  

    Unfortunately, he didn’t have insurance when he was hospitalized.  

    But luckily, Lamprey Health sat with him, helped him purchase insurance on HealthCare.gov, helping avoid potentially devastating medical debt.  

    These tax credits are vital to his and to millions of Americans’ ability to afford care.  

    But again, when asked about these tax credits, RFK refused to say that he would support extending them.  

    So much for lowering costs to families.  

    Now, if this Administration is not trying to lower costs, what are they doing to help the people they swore an oath to serve? 

    Last Friday, our research institutions got a notification, almost overnight, that their funding through the National Institutes of Health would be gutted. 

    This decision threatens our ability to find cures for diseases, to get ahead of public health crises and to hire and retain talent. 

    I think it was made rashly and irresponsibly without really understanding what the impact would be. 

    Slashing those funds won’t make research more efficient; instead, it’s going to cripple our ability to treat and cure horrific diseases.  

    Dartmouth College, which is in Hanover, New Hampshire, is one of our preeminent research institutions in the country.  

    Last year, Dartmouth received nearly $100 million in NIH funding to help with its cutting-edge research to treat diseases like diabetes, cystic fibrosis and Alzheimer’s. 

    This NIH decision—this decision by the Trump Administration—will cut Dartmouth’s funding by $38 million, and we don’t know what future impact that would be. 

    Will we miss the next cure for a pediatric cancer?  

    Will we fail to advance treatments in Alzheimer’s?  

    What we do know is that this has an immediate impact on the people living in the Upper Valley of New Hampshire.  

    More than 1,300 employees are supported by federal grants at Dartmouth, and the vast majority of these are supported by the National Institutes of Health.  

    The job loss, the economic impact that will result from this decision will be devastating.  

    And sadly, once those jobs are gone, and the researchers leave, there’s no going back because they’re going someplace else, they’re going overseas. 

    But we unfortunately know RFK that supports this decision, because he has publicly supported gutting NIH staff and research.  

    And if, RFK is confirmed, I fear he will do nothing to push back or to reverse these reckless decisions.   

    The Secretary of HHS also holds immense power over ensuring that women in our country have the ability to access reproductive health services, including abortion.  

    Interestingly, I thought this was something that RFK and I agreed on.  

    But now, I’m not clear what he supports.  

    He used to proudly say that he was pro-choice. But since being nominated, that belief seems to have disappeared overnight.  

    The only thing I think he truly believes is in his desire to do whatever Trump wants, even if it means compromising his own values. 

    Women in this country need to know that the Secretary of Health and Human Services will defend our rights to access all the health care we need. 

    But at every turn, Republicans and the Trump Administration have pushed forward dangerous policies intended to threaten access to full reproductive care. 

    They put onto the Supreme Court the justices who overturned Roe v. Wade.  

    At the state level, they have instituted draconian abortion bans that threaten the lives of mothers. 

    Women are literally dying—dying—from a lack of care because of these bans on our health.  

    This is 2025. How did we get here?  

    I remember before Roe v Wade. I remember when hundreds of thousands of women died from back alley abortions. And are we back to that point? 

    Everyone knows that banning abortion and making women seek dangerous options does not stop abortions, it makes them more deadly.  

    But with RFK at the helm, that’s the grim reality we face. 

    He’s not someone I trust to defend a woman’s right to access reproductive health care. He is not someone I want leading Health and Human Services. 

    Now, one of the few issues we have some actual insight into are his views on public health.  

    His dangerous, radical and wrong beliefs about vaccines are well documented.  

    Every child that gets sick or dies from a disease that could be prevented by a vaccine is a tragedy.  

    RFK will not only undermine public confidence in vaccines, he indicated that he intends to continue to profit from anti-vaccine lawsuits.  

    It’s shameful and it’s corrupt. 

    Now, we’ve also heard reports that the Trump administration plans to cut as much as 50 percent of Health and Human Services staff and decimate the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.  

    The CDC is our first line of defense for public health, most important, tracking and responding to outbreaks of diseases not only domestically but abroad as well.  

    The Trump Administration has already taken steps to gut out global health and aid efforts, from withdrawing from the World Health Organization, to cutting the CDC and U.S. Agency for International Development. 

    They argue that these efforts are wasteful and unnecessary.  

    But just last Friday, we were notified in New Hampshire that we had only the third confirmed case ever in the U.S. of clade 1 Monkey Pox—or Mpox.  

    The case is travel-related, meaning the patient caught the disease abroad and brought it home.  

    Sadly, these things, these diseases don’t just stop at countries’ border. They don’t just happen overseas. They affect us here at home.  

    The Trump Administration’s efforts to eliminate our public health infrastructure doesn’t make America safer, it doesn’t make America stronger and it doesn’t make America more prosperous. It does the exact opposite. 

    And Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is complicit. He’s complicit in these efforts, and he will only continue them should he be confirmed.  

    America deserves a leader at HHS who values science, who protects public health, who defends women’s rights to reproductive care—to the full range of reproductive care—and who upholds the integrity of our country’s core health systems.  

    RFK Jr. has shown time and again that he is not that leader.  

    His dangerous rhetoric on vaccines, his reckless plans to gut critical agencies and lack of understanding of basic health care make him uniquely unqualified to advance the well-being of all Americans.  

    I urge my colleagues to reject his nomination for Secretary of Health and Human Services.   

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Cassidy, Daines, Colleagues Introduce Bill to Stop Ban of Traditional Ammo, Tackle

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Louisiana Bill Cassidy
    WASHINGTON – U.S. Senators Bill Cassidy, M.D. (R-LA), Steve Daines (R-MT), and 26 Republican colleagues introduced legislation to prohibit the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM), and the U.S. Forest Service (USFS) from banning the use of lead ammunition or tackle on public lands unless such action is supported by the best available science.
    “Louisiana is known as Sportsman’s Paradise for a reason,” said Dr. Cassidy. “Federal bureaucrats who have never hunted or fished a day in their life should have no say in how our outdoorsmen enjoy our state.”
    “The great outdoors is a staple of our Montana way of life. Montana hunters and anglers play an important role in wildlife management, and a ban on lead ammo and tackle would be unfair to our sportsmen. I’ll keep fighting with my colleagues to make sure decisions impacting outdoor recreation are guided by commonsense science, not anti-hunting groups,” said Senator Daines. 
    Cassidy and Daines were joined by U.S. Senators John Thune (R-SD), Jerry Moran (R-KS), Dan Sullivan (R-AK), Thom Tillis (R-NC), Mike Crapo (R-ID), Jim Risch (R-ID), Cynthia Lummis (R-WY), John Barrasso (R-WY), Rick Scott (R-FL), James Lankford (R-OK), Tommy Tuberville (R-AL), Mike Lee (R-UT), John Boozman (R-AR), Roger Marshall (R-KS), Marsha Blackburn (R-TN), Roger Wicker (R-MS), Deb Fischer (R-NE), Tim Sheehy (R-MT), Mike Rounds (R-SD), Katie Britt (R-AL), Kevin Cramer (R-ND), Tom Cotton (R-AR), Jim Justice (R-WV), Bill Hagerty (R-TN), John Hoeven (R-ND), and Cindy Hyde-Smith (R-MS) in introducing the bill.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: ICYMI: Tuberville in Yellowhammer: President Trump’s tariffs are Making America Great Again

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Tommy Tuberville (Alabama)

    “President Trump is keeping his promises to strengthen and revitalize our nation’s economy”

    WASHINGTON – Today, U.S. Senator Tommy Tuberville (R-AL) penned an op-ed in Yellowhammer praising President Donald Trump’s recent implementation of reciprocal tariffs to ensure fairness and bolster our national security.

    Read excerpts from the piece below or here. 

    “The media is in full meltdown mode after President Trump imposed duties and retaliatory tariffs this week on countries who have been ripping us off for decades. Apparently, globalists and Democrats are just fine with other countries imposing tariffs on U.S. exports. But, when it comes to President Trump trying to establish a level playing field for domestic producers, well, that’s a bridge too far.

    No one should be remotely surprised by President Trump’s actions. He campaigned on this platform three times and has been crystal clear on his intentions – now he is following through on his promises. He views tariffs both as a negotiating tool to get other countries to bend to his will and as a way to boost American manufacturing and put America First. 

    President Trump has his work cut out for him after the disastrous past four years under President Biden. The Biden administration made it clear to our friends and foes alike that the globalist agenda would take precedent over the safety and wellbeing of the American people. 

    Thankfully, those days are over. The American people gave President Donald J. Trump a clear mandate to restore our country’s superpower status and put America First. That starts with securing our borders. That’s why President Trump threatened to impose 25% tariffs on Mexico and Canada last week unless they start working with the U.S. to secure our borders and stop the flow of fentanyl into our nation. 

    Over the past four years, the Mexican government turned a blind eye while caravans of illegal aliens flowed through Mexico into the United States. Thousands of women and children were trafficked and raped along the way. Drug cartels were uninhibited from smuggling illicit drugs across the border. That is, until President Trump re-entered the White House on January 20. 

    President Trump correctly understands that Mexico’s economy is heavily dependent on its trade relationship with the U.S. In fact, more than 80 percent of Mexico’s exports come to the United States. Mexico’s economy would almost instantly feel the effects of a 25 percent tariff, leaving Mexico’s President Claudia Sheinbaum no choice but to come to the negotiating table with master dealmaker Donald Trump. As a result, within hours of President Trump’s announcement, Mexico caved by agreeing to start helping the United States secure the border and crack down on the cartel issue.

    Our neighbor to the North also caved to President Trump after a 25 percent tariff was threatened on Canadian imports. Not only are illicit drugs like fentanyl coming into our country from Mexico, but there has also been a 2,050 percent increase from FY 2023 in drugs coming across our Northern Border. In the last fiscal year alone, enough fentanyl was seized at our Northern Border to kill 9.8 million Americans. This is a serious problem.

    Thanks to President Trump, our North American neighbors to the North and South are making changes that will protect American citizens from deadly drugs, criminals, and human traffickers.

    In addition to using tariffs as a negotiating tool, President Trump also views tariffs as a way to right the wrongs of past, ineffective trade deals. That’s why this week he is imposing a 25 percent tariff on steel and aluminum. Contrary to what the media would tell you, this isn’t unprecedented. […]

    The tariffs being imposed this week are an important step in President Trump’s plan to restore fairness to trade, boost domestic manufacturing and put American consumers and producers first. America has some of the best and brightest manufacturers, producers, farmers, and businesses. We shouldn’t be going to other countries for products we can make right here at home.

    Three weeks into his presidency, President Trump is keeping his promises to strengthen and revitalize our nation’s economy, stem the flow of illicit drugs and illegal immigration, and make sure our trade deals are fair for taxpayers and the American worker. President Trump is utilizing every tool at his disposal, including tariffs, to usher in the Golden Age of America.”

    MORE:
    Tuberville Speaks On Importance Of Boosting U.S. Economy To Help Struggling Seniors
    Tuberville Praises President Trump For Making Tariffs Great Again
    ICYMI: Tuberville Joins “The Bottom Line” on Fox Business
    Tuberville Calls for Increase in Agricultural Exports
    Tuberville Introduces Bill to End Reliance on Russia, Boost Alabama Businesses and Workers
    Tuberville Cosponsors Legislation to Protect American Manufacturing
    Tuberville Continues Advocating for Alabama’s Ag Interests in Farm Bill Hearing

    Senator Tommy Tuberville represents Alabama in the United States Senate and is a member of the Senate Armed Services, Agriculture, Veterans’ Affairs, HELP, and Aging Committees.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Tuberville, Daines Fight for Outdoorsmen Across the Country

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Tommy Tuberville (Alabama)
    WASHINGTON – Today, U.S. Senator Tommy Tuberville (R-AL) joined U.S. Senator Steve Daines (R-MT) in cosponsoring a bill to prohibit the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), and the U.S. Forest Service (USFS) from banning the use of lead ammunition or tackle on public lands unless such action is supported by the best available science—the Protecting Access for Hunters and Anglers Act. 
    Sen. Tuberville cosponsored this legislation last Congress.
    “From Sand Mountain to the Gulf of America, Alabamians devote a large portion of their free time to hunting in the great outdoors,” said Sen. Tuberville. “Placing a ban on lead ammo and tackle is unfair to those who choose to enjoy nature and wildlife. As an avid outdoorsman, I will keep fighting to ensure the rights of Alabama hunters and anglers are protected.”
    “The great outdoors is a staple of our Montana way of life. Montana hunters and anglers play an important role in wildlife management, and a ban on lead ammo and tackle would be unfair to our sportsmen. I’ll keep fighting with my colleagues to make sure decisions impacting outdoor recreation are guided by commonsense science, not anti-hunting groups,” said Sen. Daines.
    U.S. Senators Tuberville and Daines are joined by U.S. Senators John Barrasso (R-WY), Marsha Blackburn (R-TN), John Boozman (R-AR), Katie Britt (R-AL), Bill Cassidy (R-LA), Tom Cotton (R-AR), Kevin Cramer (R-ND), Mike Crapo (R-ID), Deb Fischer (R-NE), Bill Hagerty (R-TN), John Hoeven (R-ND), Cindy Hyde-Smith (R-MS), Jim Justice (R-WV), James Lankford (R-OK), Mike Lee (R-UT), Cynthia Lummis (R-WY), Roger Marshall (R-KS), Jerry Moran (R-KS), Jim Risch (R-IN), Mike Rounds (R-SD), Rick Scott (R-FL), Dan Sullivan (R-AK), Thom Tillis (R-NC), John Thune (R-SD), and Roger Wicker (R-MS) in cosponsoring the legislation. 
    Read full text of the legislation here.
    Senator Tommy Tuberville represents Alabama in the United States Senate and is a member of the Senate Armed Services, Agriculture, Veterans’ Affairs, HELP, and Aging Committees.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: SCHUMER STATEMENT ON SIXTEENTH ANNIVERSARY OF COLGAN AIR FLIGHT 3407 PLANE CRASH IN WESTERN NEW YORK

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for New York Charles E Schumer
    Washington, D.C. – U.S. Senator Charles E. Schumer today released the following statement about the sixteenth anniversary of the Colgan Air Flight 3407 plane crash in Western New York:
    “Today marks sixteen years since the Colgan Air Flight 3407 crash in Western New York in which 50 people tragically died. For years after, I was proud to work with the families, who turned their grief into action and united to successfully push for new regulations and legislation that has made air travel safer. Together, we have faced down the special interests to accomplish lifesaving policy changes and protected them repeatedly. We mourn for those we have lost, and I extend my ongoing support and partnership to the families who I have worked with and gotten to know over the years. Their example inspires us to continue to make air travel as safe as possible for all.”

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Kaine & Colleagues Press Rubio for Answers on Impact of Foreign Assistance Cuts in the Western Hemisphere

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Virginia Tim Kaine
    WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, U.S. Senator Tim Kaine (D-VA), Ranking Member of the Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee on the Western Hemisphere, led his colleagues in sending a letter to Secretary of State Marco Rubio pressing him for answers on the Trump Administration’s cuts to U.S. foreign assistance programs and its harmful impact on U.S. national security, including the abrupt curtailment of efforts to mitigate narcotics trafficking, migration, and cartel violence in the Western Hemisphere. The letter comes after Secretary Rubio made his first trip as Secretary of State to Panama, El Salvador, Costa Rica, Guatemala, and the Dominican Republic.
    “We welcomed your decision to visit key Latin American countries from February 1-6, 2025 – Panama, El Salvador, Costa Rica, Guatemala and the Dominican Republic – for your first trip as Secretary of State,” wrote the senators. “All five countries are also home to important U.S. foreign assistance programs and USAID missions that manage much of this funding.”
    “These programs are fundamental to advancing the exact national security priorities you highlighted as the trip’s themes: bolstering regional cooperation, preventing large-scale irregular migration, curtailing cartel activity, countering China and deepening economic partnerships. However, all five countries continue to be subject to a blanket freeze, including on critical national security assistance programming and the suspension of USAID activities on January 24,” they continued.
    The senators then provided several examples of how U.S. foreign assistance in Panama, El Salvador, Costa Rica, Guatemala, and the DR has helped counter migration and drug trafficking, strengthen democratic institutions and the rule of law, and boost economic growth in the region. They also emphasized the critical role of U.S. foreign assistance in countering China, which has made significant investments in the region over the past decade in an effort to exert influence and control.  
    The senators continued, “During your confirmation hearing, you affirmed that our foreign policy should make America safer, stronger and more prosperous. This freeze in foreign assistance runs contrary to your stated goals and only helps the U.S’s  adversaries. We urge you to closely consider the disruption caused to U.S. security interests by the blanket freezing of these programs, and by the efforts of Elon Musk and the Trump Administration to destroy USAID.”
    “Now that you have returned from your historic trip, we urge you to reflect on the role of U.S. foreign assistance in solidifying our partnerships and advancing our national security interests in Panama, El Salvador, Costa Rica, Guatemala, and the Dominican Republic, as well as throughout the world, and quickly reverse this short-sighted and damaging freeze,” the senators concluded.
    In addition to Kaine, the letter is cosigned by U.S. Senators Chuck Schumer (D-NY), Cory Booker (D-NJ), Chris Van Hollen (D-MD), Peter Welch (D-VT), Mazie K. Hirono (D-HI), John Hickenlooper (D-CO), Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), and Alex Padilla (D-CA).
    Full text of the letter is available here and below:
    Dear Secretary Rubio:
    We welcomed your decision to visit key Latin American countries from February 1-6, 2025 – Panama, El Salvador, Costa Rica, Guatemala and the Dominican Republic – for your first trip as Secretary of State. This decision reflects our mutual understanding of the critical role of our Western Hemisphere partnerships in U.S. national security.
    All five countries are also home to important U.S. foreign assistance programs and USAID missions that manage much of this funding. These programs are fundamental to advancing the exact national security priorities you highlighted as the trip’s themes: bolstering regional cooperation, preventing large-scale irregular migration, curtailing cartel activity, countering China and deepening economic partnerships. However, all five countries continue to be subject to a blanket freeze, including on critical national security assistance programming and the suspension of USAID activities on January 24.
    During your stop in El Salvador, you visited the Aeroman aeronautics plant and used this location as a venue for disparaging the work of USAID and its employees. Although you touted Aeroman as an example of private sector innovation, you may be interested to learn that Aeroman itself is a longstanding beneficiary of USAID’s Bridges to Employment program.
    Other examples include:
    Migrant return programs supported by USAID have helped El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras receive and process nearly 150,000 returned migrants. Prior to January 24, USAID fostered the sustainable reintegration of these migrants into their communities, significantly reducing repeat migration. At a time in which the Trump administration is pushing these countries to accept more and more deportees, these programs are no longer active. 
    In Panama, U.S. foreign assistance has supported projects to enhance border security and boost Panama’s ability to counter narcotrafficking routes and networks. The Darien Gap, on Panama’s southern border with Colombia, is the only land route for migrants traveling north from South America. These programs are no longer active.
    In El Salvador, Congress has appropriated funds for programs to address the security, economic, and social drivers of irregular migration and to strengthen democratic institutions. With poverty around 30 percent over the last five years and with an economy highly dependent on remittances, mass deportations to El Salvador as well as political instability risk an explosion of gang violence. These programs are no longer active.
    In Costa Rica, U.S. foreign assistance has supported Costa Rican law enforcement efforts to dramatically reduce the influence of drug cartels and mitigate other destabilizing security threats – to include helping the country house migrants who would otherwise travel north to the U.S. border. U.S. economic assistance programming has also fostered a ripe investment climate for U.S. firms, including a major Intel computer chip factory that is essential to efforts to counter China’s chipmaking capacity. These programs are no longer active.
    In Guatemala, U.S. foreign assistance has promoted democratic resilience and political stability, including the provision of cost-effective development assistance to support job creation and fostering opportunities for foreign direct investment. This has played a major role in stemming migration and creating economic incentives for migrants and Guatemalans to stay in Guatemala rather than traveling north to the U.S. border. As a result of active U.S. partnership, Guatemala remains one of 12 countries to recognize Taiwan, despite significant pressure from China. These programs are no longer active.
    In the Dominican Republic, U.S. assistance has supported health programs that have limited the spread of infectious diseases – in a country geographically very close to the United States – and has served to mitigate migrant outflows. These programs are no longer active.
    As must have been clear during your trip, U.S. national security interests in every location you visited have been directly advanced by the thoughtful execution of U.S. foreign assistance programming.
    Throughout your Congressional career you were a forceful advocate for curtailing Chinese influence globally and advancing the interests of the American people. You spoke eloquently about the essential role of foreign assistance in advancing U.S. interests. You have also rightly asserted that although foreign assistance represents less than 1 percent of the U.S. budget, it is a major force multiplier that keeps our adversaries at bay. During your confirmation hearing, you affirmed that our foreign policy should make America safer, stronger and more prosperous. This freeze in foreign assistance runs contrary to your stated goals and only helps the U.S’s  adversaries. We urge you to closely consider the disruption caused to U.S. security interests by the blanket freezing of these programs, and by the efforts of Elon Musk and the Trump Administration to destroy USAID.
    What is further clear is that Elon Musk – who maintains deep financial connections to China and engages in secret meetings with Russian officials – does not share your priorities or those of the United States. China and Russia are already moving rapidly to exploit the weaknesses created by the Trump Administration’s global retreat.
    The United States is best able to project power around the world when we are comfortable in our own hemisphere. We are safer and more prosperous when our neighbors are safer and more prosperous. Now that you have returned from your historic trip, we urge you to reflect on the role of U.S. foreign assistance in solidifying our partnerships and advancing our national security interests in Panama, El Salvador, Costa Rica, Guatemala, and the Dominican Republic, as well as throughout the world, and quickly reverse this short-sighted and damaging freeze.
    Sincerely,

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Kaine Statement on Trump Saying He Wants to Close U.S. Department of Education Immediately

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Virginia Tim Kaine

    WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, U.S. Senator Tim Kaine (D-VA), a member of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee, released the following statement after President Donald Trump said he wants the U.S. Department of Education to be closed immediately:

    “President Trump lives in a fantasy if he thinks closing the Department of Education is a good idea. Americans know that the key to achieving the American dream begins with a good education. The Education Department provides critical support for K-12 schools, administers aid to students pursuing higher education and job training programs, allows students with disabilities to access the same education opportunities as other students, and so much more. Closing the Department would harm every student across America, have negative consequences for our country’s economic growth and competitiveness for decades to come, and set America’s students up for failure. There is nothing more important right now to our nation’s success than ensuring students get the high-quality education they need, and I will use every legislative tool at my disposal to ensure this doesn’t happen.”

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Video: Kaine Delivers Remarks Slamming Republican Budget Bill Teeing Up Tax Cuts for the Wealthy

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Virginia Tim Kaine

    BROADCAST-QUALITY VIDEO OF KAINE’S REMARKS IS AVAILABLE HERE.

    WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, during a Senate Budget Committee hearing, U.S. Senator Tim Kaine (D-VA) slammed Republicans’ budget resolution that would tee up tax cuts for billionaires at the expense of middle-class Americans. Today, the Senate Budget Committee is beginning a legislative process known as “reconciliation,” which allows certain legislation to be expedited and passed in the Senate by a simple majority. Senate Republicans are using this process to pass their budget proposal in order to avoid having to meet the 60-vote threshold needed for most other legislation.

    “I view this exercise and this resolution as a Trojan horse,” said Kaine. “You do not need reconciliation to do defense, you do not need reconciliation border security. There’s a demonstrated track record in this body that both of those can be done in a bipartisan way. So what’s this bill about?”

    “This is an effort to dramatically cut spending on programs that affect everyday Virginians and everyday Americans,” Kaine continued. “Those dollars – combined with the tariffs that Donald Trump is laying on American families that will make everything more expensive – then go into a big pot that gets used to fund tax cuts for the wealthy.”

    President Donald Trump and Republicans in Congress are currently negotiating an extension to Trump’s 2017 tax law, which cut taxes for large corporations and the highest-income earners and substantially increased the federal deficit. They are now proposing broad-based tariffs and massive, across-the-board cuts to federal programs like Medicaid to fund these tax cuts for billionaires. Tax estimates have shown that if enacted, Trump’s tariffs could raise costs by $2,500 to nearly $4,000 per household, and American consumers could lose between $46 billion to $78 billion in spending power each year.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Kennedy champions bill to repeal woke CFPB rule forcing banks to collect data on sex, ethnicity from small businesses

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator John Kennedy (Louisiana)

    WASHINGTON – Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.) today introduced a bill to repeal the Biden administration’s Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) rule that would implement Section 1071 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. Section 1071 amends the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA) to require financial institutions to collect certain personal information on small businesses when they seek a loan.

    In 2023, Congress passed Kennedy’s joint resolution of disapproval under the Congressional Review Act to reverse the Biden administration’s rule, which requires banks to report to the CFPB on small business owners’ race, ethnicity and sex; and whether a business is minority-owned, women-owned or LGBT-owned. However, President Joe Biden vetoed the resolution, and the rule remains in effect.

    “President Biden’s woke CFPB put small business owners’ information at risk by requiring their personal details to be exposed online. My bill would repeal the last administration’s misguided regulation so that job creators’ private information isn’t public, and government doesn’t stand in the way of Main Street’s access to loans,” Kennedy said.

    Rep. Roger Williams (R-Texas) introduced the bill in the House of Representatives.

    Background:

    • On March 30, 2023, the CFPB promulgated the final rule implementing Section 1071 of the Dodd-Frank Act, which amends the ECOA. The rule was published in the Federal Register on May 31, 2023.
    • Section 1071 requires covered financial institutions to collect and report certain personal information on small business loan applicants and report that to the CFPB. The CFPB may then make certain parts of that information public, including data that could publicly identify the small business credit applicant.
    • In order to comply with the Biden CFPB rule, financial institutions would have to collect information about applicants, including the applicant’s census tract, North American Industry Classification System and years in business, among other personal information.
    • The rule applies to financial institutions that originated at least 100 small business loans in each of the two preceding calendar years.
    • Based on the number of credit transactions for small businesses, covered financial institutions must comply with the final rule beginning Oct. 1, 2024; April 1, 2025; or Jan. 1, 2026.
    • A small business is defined as a company with $5 million or less in revenue from the previous fiscal year. 
    • Among the many concerns about the CFPB’s collecting and storing such personal information is that the agency recently experienced a data breach including the personally identifiable information of 256,000 consumers and failed to properly inform them for two months.
    • The implementation of this rule may reduce the availability and accessibility of small business credit by increasing compliance costs of lenders.

    Sens. Cindy Hyde-Smith (R-Miss.), Joni Ernst (R-Iowa), John Boozman (R-Ark.), Roger Wicker (R-Miss.), John Barrasso (R-Wyo.), Mike Rounds (R-S.D.), Steve Daines (R-Mont.) and Ted Cruz (R-Texas) cosponsored the bill.

    Text of the bill is here.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: News 02/12/2025 VIDEO: Blackburn Details New Report Documenting Crimes Committed by Illegal Aliens in Tennessee During Biden’s Final Months

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn)

    WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, U.S. Senator Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) delivered remarks on the Senate floor about the Tennessee District Attorneys General Conference’s report documenting the widespread migrant crime in Tennessee that occurred during the final months of the Biden-Harris administration. In the final three months of 2024, thousands of illegal aliens in Tennessee were charged with driving under the influence, domestic and aggravated assault, child abuse, rape, vehicular homicide, murder, and other heinous crimes.  

    Click here to watch Senator Blackburn’s remarks. 

    REMARKS AS PREPARED

    Since President Trump Took Office, Migrant Encounters Are Down 87% at Southern Border

    In just his first weeks back in the Oval Office, President Trump has taken strong action to secure our border. Through executive actions alone, the President has restored the successful Remain-in-Mexico policy, restarted border wall construction, ended catch-and-release, sent troops to the southern border, conducted deportations, and done so much more to Make America Safe Again. Already, we’re seeing incredible results. 

    In operations across the country, Immigration and Customs Enforcement has arrested 11,000 criminal illegal aliens, including many violent offenders and gang members. Since Inauguration Day, meanwhile, migrant encounters at the southern border have reportedly dropped 87 percent. To be certain, forceful efforts to secure our border are urgently needed.

    For four years, former President Biden allowed more than 10 million illegal aliens to enter our country, including tens of thousands of convicted criminals and more than 1.7 million known “gotaways.” And for four years, Tennesseans and Americans across the country have suffered the tragic consequences, including rampant migrant crime.

    New Report Documents Widespread Migrant Crime in Tennessee Under Biden

    Recently, the Tennessee District Attorneys General Conference released a report documenting the widespread migrant crime in our state during the final months of the Biden administration. In many ways, the report confirms what we already know: During the Biden years, every town was a border town, and every state was a border state.

    In just the final three months of 2024, there were a staggering 2,719 reports of illegal aliens being charged or convicted of 3,854 offenses in the State of Tennessee. Among them, the most common offense was driving under the influence, at 654 arrests. Shockingly, these offenses accounted for more than 13 percent of all DUI arrests statewide.

    This problem is a big reason why, last year, my Republican colleagues and I introduced the Protect Our Communities From DUIs Act. This bill would automatically deport any illegal who is charged with driving under the influence.

    Over the same period—from October to December last year—illegal aliens committed hundreds of violent, heinous crimes: 154 instances of domestic assault, 80 of aggravated assault, 21 of child abuse, 9 of statutory rape, 8 of sexual exploitation of a minor, 7 of vehicular homicide, 4 of murder, 3 of rape of a child, and on and on. Disturbingly, these numbers are likely an undercount: Only 73 of Tennessee’s 95 counties reported data to the District Attorneys General Conference.

    Biden’s Open Border Enabled Thousands of Crimes by Illegal Aliens in Tennessee

    Under Biden, national data showed that illegal aliens were pouring in from countries all over the world—and the Tennessee migrant crime report also reflects this. Across all the offenders, there were 92 unique countries of origin, from Mexico and Guatemala to Jamaica and Romania.

    Here’s the bottom line: Because of Biden’s open border, thousands of crimes were committed by thousands of criminal illegal aliens in the State of Tennessee over just a three-month span. And this is just one state. We know this is happening in communities across the country.

    More than anything, the report underscores the importance of President Trump’s mass deportations, which are already underway. Thankfully, there are many ways for Congress to support these efforts. My CLEAR Act, for example, would ensure state and local law enforcement officials have the tools to help the federal government deport criminal illegal aliens.

    This is crucial—especially when far-left leaders like Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson are refusing to turn over criminal illegal aliens to federal custody. Thankfully, Attorney General Bondi is suing these sanctuary cities for allowing criminal illegals—who have no right to be in our great nation—to harm Americans.

    Blackburn Bills Would Allow Deportation of Illegal Aliens Convicted of Sex Crimes and Ensure Border States Have More Authority to Secure Their Borders

    I’ve also introduced the Preventing Violence Against Women by Illegal Aliens Act, which would allow the deportation of illegal aliens convicted of sexual offenses or domestic violence. Any illegal alien who commits these heinous crimes should be removed from our country immediately.

    And my CONTAINER Act would ensure that border states such as Texas have the legal authority to place temporary barriers on federal land to help stop the flow of traffickers, drugs, and criminals at the southern border. With help from states securing the border, ICE can direct more resources to deporting criminal illegals who are already in our country.

    With thousands of criminal illegals residing in Tennessee and across the country, we should be using every resource at our disposal to remove them from our country. In many ways, these bills would help President Trump get the job done.

    MIL OSI USA News