Category: Weather

  • MIL-OSI China: China’s green system wins key approval

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    China Daily | May 20, 2025

    China’s energy market is becoming more accessible to green businesses worldwide, now that a key global renewable energy initiative has given its full backing to the nation’s green electricity certificates, authorities said.

    The National Energy Administration is pushing for wider use of the certificates to boost green power consumption, following the recent unconditional recognition given to the GEC system by RE100, a global campaign involving more than 400 member businesses that have committed to eventually using 100 percent renewable electricity in their operations.

    Wan Jinsong, deputy head of the NEA, said that RE100’s unconditional acceptance of the GECs is a “landmark achievement” that signals the international standing of the system.

    The move confirms that China’s renewable electricity market has made a crucial step forward in providing confidence to companies that use the GEC system, as they can make credible claims about using green power, knowing that their renewable energy purchases have a verifiable impact, according to the RE100 website.

    It also said that China has become an attractive international market for companies’ drive toward 100 percent renewable electricity, as proving their use of renewables in the country is now easier.

    Furthermore, the GEC system ensures that renewable energy use by large manufacturers in China is recognized throughout global supply chains, it said.

    Currently, 270 RE100 member companies purchase green electricity in China, according to Helen Clarkson, CEO of the Climate Group, which co-launched RE100.

    They reported an annual green electricity volume of 77 billion kilowatt-hours, accounting for 59 percent of their electricity consumption. Among these, the manufacturing sector consumed the most green electricity, reaching 63.876 billion kWh, said Clarkson.

    She added that RE100’s unconditional approval shows the influence of China’s GECs on the international stage. The system helps RE100 members and their suppliers meet renewable energy commitments, offering them more flexible ways to do so.

    This recognition followed successful discussions between RE100 and the China Renewable Energy Engineering Institute based on the mutual consensus on improvements to China’s GEC system that were led by the Chinese government.

    RE100 was launched in 2014 by the Climate Group and Carbon Disclosure Project. Member companies commit to using 100 percent renewable electricity by no later than 2050. Its technical guidelines influence how global companies and their supply chains buy renewable electricity.

    Yi Yuechun, deputy head of the China Renewable Energy Engineering Institute, said the GEC system helps assess provincial-level renewable energy targets and the use of green power by industries such as aluminum production. It also supports carbon accounting and carbon footprint calculations, he said.

    Manufacturing sectors such as telecommunications and automotive account for 70 percent of green electricity certificate purchases, he added.

    The GECs are the sole proof of the environmental attributes of renewable energy in China and serve as the only certificate for verifying renewable energy production and consumption. One certificate is generated for every 1,000 kWh of green electricity.

    China started its GEC system in 2017. Previously, China’s green certificates were only conditionally accepted by RE100, requiring extra proof. China improved the system by expanding the GECs to cover all renewable power projects in 2023 and making it the sole proof of renewable energy attributes.

    German chemical giant BASF was one of the first foreign companies to buy green power in China. BASF has been investing in new energy projects while also buying green electricity in China through power trading and the GECs to reduce its carbon emissions, it said.

    Pan Huimin, deputy head of the NEA’s new and renewable energy department, said the RE100 recognition will significantly increase the willingness and enthusiasm of RE100 member companies and their supply chains to purchase green electricity and use China’s certificates. This is expected to further expand the demand for the GECs, she said.

    Pan said that the NEA will continue to work with relevant departments to strengthen communication and exchanges with RE100. It will encourage RE100 to issue technical guidelines related to purchasing the GECs, which would better assist Chinese companies in buying them.

    The NEA will also enhance communication on the GEC system with China’s major trading partners to accelerate the process of achieving international mutual recognition.

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI USA: ICYMI: Sen. Cramer Op-Ed: If Countries Want Access to Our Markets, They Must Abide By Our Standards

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Kevin Cramer (R-ND)
    BISMARCK, N.D. – On President Trump’s “Liberation Day” last month, he argued non-tariff trade barriers are often more damaging to America’s competitiveness than actual tariffs imposed by foreign governments. He rightly called out unfair practices like currency manipulation, export subsidies, and intellectual property theft. But one often-overlooked offense stands out: lax environmental standards, enforcement, and compliance.
    In his remarks, the President blasted other countries for accusing America of committing environmental crimes and demanding that our producers pay for damages for which they were not responsible. U.S. Senator Kevin Cramer (R-ND), member of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, penned an op-ed in RealClearEnergy, arguing for an America First approach to foreign pollution, and that the rules we impose on ourselves reflect our stewardship values. If countries want access to our markets they should abide by our standards, and we shouldn’t devolve to theirs. 

    If Countries Want Access to Our Markets, They Must Abide By Our Standards
    RealClearEnergy – May 19, 2024
    On President Trump’s “Liberation Day,” he argued non-tariff trade barriers are often more damaging to America’s competitiveness than actual tariffs imposed by foreign governments.  
    The President called out several unfair practices used to create an artificial advantage in trade – currency manipulation, export subsidies, intellectual property theft, exorbitant value-added taxes, and unfair rules. But one often-overlooked offense stands out: lax environmental standards, enforcement, and compliance. He is right to pinpoint this disparity as it undermines U.S. competitiveness and directly harms the wellbeing of Americans.
    Emissions from industrial activities across the Pacific, particularly in China, contribute up to 30% of surface ozone and 20% of fine particulate matter in the western U.S., making it more difficult for states to meet their air quality targets under the Clean Air Act. In addition, mercury pollution from coal-fired plants in Asia accounts for 20 to 40% of mercury deposition in the West.
    If American facilities fail to comply with our environmental statutes, a state’s federal highway funds can be withheld, or strict regulatory constraints impacting the permitting and investment of new industrial facilities could be imposed. This is why U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Lee Zeldin recently announced the removal of red tape that placed excessive burden on states’ ability to prove their pollution problem was linked to foreign sources. He understands Americans should not be punished for another country’s’ pollution.
    U.S. companies work hard to meet EPA requirements. They spend hundreds of billions on environmental compliance, with our manufacturing and energy-intensive sectors bearing the highest burden. A National Association of Manufacturers’ report found the average U.S. producer pays over $10,000 per employee annually on meeting environmental standards.
    When a regulation’s costs outweigh its public benefits, it should be eliminated. But Americans live by the old Boy Scout adage to “leave this world a little better than you found it.” We want safe environments for our workers, clean air and water, and for our innovators to create more efficient ways to produce more in America. The rules we impose on ourselves reflect our stewardship values. If countries want access to our markets they should abide by our standards, and we shouldn’t devolve to theirs. 
    “Free-trade-at-any-cost” idealogues portend all commodities are created equal, as if there isn’t intrinsic value in where a product is made. In their mind, a barrel of Russian or Iranian oil is the same as one out of North Dakota or Alaska, or a rod of Chinese steel is no different than one out of Cleveland or Pittsburgh. Never mind these foreign producers are dirtier, use their profits to promulgate foreign wars, and exploit abhorrent labor standards.
    In his remarks, the President blasted other countries for accusing America of committing environmental crimes and demanding that our producers pay for damages for which they were not responsible.   
    He’s right to decry this hypocrisy and I’m committed to working with him to hold overseas polluters accountable.
    Last Congress, Sen. Chris Coons (D-DE) and I introduced the PROVE IT Act, which would require the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) to develop a dataset to compare the relative carbon efficiency of U.S. production to our foreign competitors. Existing data compiled by the Climate Leadership Council already shows the United States has a clear carbon advantage over its competitors. While the idea of using carbon as a metric might confuse those who seek to punish overseas producers for traditional pollutants, it serves as an excellent proxy for actual emissions. 
    On paper, China’s environmental regulatory regime appears reasonable, but enforcement and compliance suffer from corruption that results in cheating. Chinese companies, especially coal-fired power plants and heavy industries, have been documented turning off or bypassing pollution scrubbers to cut costs. Our bill requires DOE to strictly review foreign data to make sure this type of cheating isn’t tolerated.
    The President is right to focus on the effects of unfair trade practices to level the playing field. An America First approach on foreign pollution, however, can do much more – it can rewrite the script on how conservatives view U.S. environmental progress.
    Paired with effective trade measures that hold overseas polluters accountable, we can monetize the superior environmental performance of our workers and industry and protect public health. At the same time, we can create a durable and transparent trade agenda that not only encourages domestic investment in manufacturing but also cleans up the global environment. 
    Global demand for virtually everything is growing. If we want cleaner, more secure supply chains, we won’t get there by punishing ourselves. The solution is recognizing our excellence and making more in America!
    President Trump gets this. But first, we need the comparative emissions data authorized by the PROVE IT Act to determine the scope of this unfair trade practice and to help understand the impact of foreign pollution on America.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Strong demand and reduced domestic competition have contributed to significant earnings for Qantas Group and Virgin Australia

    Source: Australian Ministers for Regional Development

    Australia’s two largest airline groups have both recorded strong financial results for the first half of 2024-25, reflecting a number of factors including strong ongoing demand for flying and limited domestic competition, the ACCC’s latest Domestic Airline Competition report has found.

    Qantas Group reported earnings before interest and taxes of $1.5 billion for the first half of 2024-25, with $916 million coming from its domestic operations across both Qantas and Jetstar.

    Of the Qantas Group’s total earnings, Qantas Domestic, including Qantaslink, contributed the highest share of the group’s earnings at $647 million. Much of this result can be attributed to the airline’s dominance in the corporate travel market – Qantas Group had an 80 per cent share of the corporate travel market over the reporting period, coinciding with a resurgence in demand.

    “The high half-yearly earnings reported by Qantas Group reflect its dominance of the domestic airline sector, with Qantas and Jetstar accounting for over 60 per cent of passengers,” ACCC Commissioner Anna Brakey said.

    The domestic operations of Jetstar recorded the biggest increase in earnings across the Qantas Group, increasing by 53.7 per cent between the first half 2023-24 and 2024-25, to $269 million. Jetstar Domestic became the sole low-cost carrier in Australia after the exit of Tigerair in 2020, and again when Bonza collapsed in April 2024.

    “Jetstar has been able to capitalise on the continued absence of competitive pressure from another low-cost carrier in the domestic market to increase its market share and operating margin,” Ms Brakey said.

    While Virgin Australia does not publicly report half-year results, its then CEO, Jayne Hrdlicka, said in February that the airline group had achieved record profits in the first half of the current financial year, following its post-administration restructure under Bain Capital.

    After the withdrawal of Rex from routes connecting capital cities, Virgin Australia has increased its share of passengers to 34.4 per cent in March 2025, up from 31.3 per cent from a year prior. Virgin Australia also secured three of Rex’s Boeing 737 aircraft leases, which has facilitated its ability to add seat capacity and improve network resilience.

    Record passenger volumes in April following weather disruptions in March

    Although the data was not yet available for this report, airlines and airports were expecting a significant increase in travellers in April with school holidays, Easter and ANZAC day all condensed into a three-week period. Airservices Australia noted that 17 April 2025 (the Thursday before Good Friday) was the busiest day for domestic travel in the past five years.

    This follows disruptions to travel in March, when passenger levels declined by 4.9 per cent compared to March 2024, which can be attributed to Ex-Tropical Cyclone Alfred and associated severe weather events along the east coast of Australia.

    Flights operating between Brisbane-Sydney and Brisbane-Melbourne experienced a 9.9 per cent and 9 per cent reduction in passengers in March 2025 respectively. Meanwhile, Gold Coast and Maroochydore airports experienced the biggest decline in passengers over this period by 30.2 per cent and 25.1 per cent respectively.

    The weather disruptions also contributed to the average industry flight cancellation rate increasing significantly in March 2025 to 5 per cent, compared to the long-term industry average of 2.2 per cent.

    Despite the disruptions caused by Ex-Tropical Cyclone Alfred, the on-time arrival rate has improved over the past six months to levels just below the long-term industry average of 80.7 per cent. The average industry on-time arrival rate was 80.2 per cent in March 2025, an improvement from 74.5 per cent in October 2024.

    “It is encouraging to see the on-time arrival rate improving as this means travellers can have more confidence that their flight will arrive at the time they booked,” Ms Brakey said.

    Seasonal patterns driving recent movements in airfares

    Following a peak in October 2024, the average airfare fell by 16.1 per cent in the three months to January 2025, before increasing again by 9.6 per cent by March 2025.

    “The trends observed in average airfares since January reflect seasonal factors and are broadly consistent with those observed in previous years,” Ms Brakey said.

    “Average airfares have come down from their peak in October 2024.”

    Demand for domestic air travel in the first quarter of 2025 was lower than 12 months prior. However, 2024 was a particularly unusual year by comparison due to significant events that led to unprecedented demand for flights to Melbourne and Sydney, such as the Taylor Swift concerts in February 2024, which in turn led to higher airfares as demand outstripped supply. The Easter long weekend also fell in March last year which contributed to the increase in demand for travel during this time.

    Background

    On 6 November 2023, the Treasurer directed the ACCC to recommence domestic air passenger transport monitoring. Under this direction the ACCC is to monitor prices, costs and profits relating to the supply of domestic air passenger transport services for a period of three years and to report on its monitoring at least once every quarter.

    The ACCC collects data from Jetstar, Qantas, Rex and Virgin Australia for monitoring purposes.

    Rex entered voluntary administration in July 2024 but continues to operate its regional services. The government is guaranteeing regional flight bookings for Rex customers throughout the voluntary administration process.

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Peters, Slotkin & Bergman Urge Swift Approval of Major Disaster Declaration for Northern Michigan

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Michigan Gary Peters

    WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Senators Gary Peters (MI), and Elissa Slotkin (MI), as well as U.S. Representative Jack Bergman (MI-01), are calling on President Trump to declare a Major Disaster for northern Michigan following the severe winter storms in late March. In their letter, the lawmakers supported Governor Gretchen Whitmer’s request for assistance for Alcona, Alpena, Antrim, Charlevoix, Cheboygan, Crawford, Emmet, Montmorency, Oscoda, Otsego, and Presque Isle, Kalkaska and Mackinac Counties, as well as the Little Traverse Bay Band of Odawa Indians. The National Weather Service has ranked this as one of the most significant ice storms ever recorded in northern Michigan. 

    “Starting on March 28, northern Michigan experienced extreme winter weather, including a prolonged period of freezing rain which resulted in severe ice accumulation,” the lawmakers wrote. “This caused widespread destruction to homes, businesses, and infrastructure, causing long-term power outages for hundreds of thousands of residents.” 

    The lawmakers continued: “The affected counties also have poverty and unemployment rates that exceed the national average, and seven of the counties have a higher unemployment rate than Michigan’s state average. The disaster area also includes a significant population of individuals who are older than 65 years of age, have disabilities, or receive retirement income. As you know, these factors indicate that these communities are particularly vulnerable after disasters and increases the need for federal assistance to ensure equitable recovery.” 

    State and federal officials estimate the storm caused $137 million in immediate response costs and inflicted severe damage to homes and infrastructure. Given the scale of the damage from this storm, and as the state continues to recover from three other state-declared disasters in the past two years, federal assistance is needed to help these Michigan communities fully recover. 

    “We commend the great work the federal government has done in helping Michigan recover from previous disasters,” continued the lawmakers. “However, in the absence of a federal disaster declaration, Michigan will not have the capacity to ensure these communities receive the aid they need to fully recover. We urge your speedy approval of this request.”  

    Text of the letter is available here. 

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Proposed temporary fisheries closures at Tangoiro/Waihirere and Motuoroi, north of Gisborne

    Source: police-emblem-97

    Have your say

    Ngāti Wakarara – Ngāti Hau Takutai Kaitiaki Trust has requested 2 temporary closures at:

    1. Tangoiro/Waihirere
    2. Motuoroi.

    Both areas are north of Gisborne. If granted, the closures would prohibit the take of finfish and shellfish (including crustaceans and rock lobster) for 2 years, under section 186A of the Fisheries Act 1996.

    The request follows a rāhui and previous temporary closures. The request states that additional time is needed for:

    • further population recovery after Cyclones Hale and Gabrielle
    • data collection over a sufficient timescale
    • to establish longer-term protection strategies.

    Fisheries New Zealand invites written submissions from anyone who has an interest in the species concerned, or in the effects of fishing in the areas.

    We are accepting submissions from 20 May until 5pm on 18 June 2025.

    Letter requesting the closures

    Tangoiro Waihirere and Motuoroi Temporary Closure Request 2025 (Redacted) [PDF, 1 MB]

    The proposed closure areas

    The area of the proposed Tangoiro/Waihirere temporary closure covers about 0.7 square kilometres and includes the fisheries waters offshore of Tangoiro and Waihirere Beachs. The proposed area excludes the rock platform at the southern end of Waihirere Beach.

    Map of the proposed Tangoiro/Waihirere temporary closure [PDF, 625 KB]

    The area of the proposed Motuoroi temporary closure covers about 1.2 square kilometres, and includes the fisheries waters between Motuoroi Island and the mainland, from the Lockwood Woolshed to south of the shore caves.

    Map of the proposed Motuoroi temporary closure [PDF, 637 KB]

    Map of both proposed temporary closures [PDF, 519 KB]

    Making your submission

    The closing date for submissions is 5pm on Wednesday 18 June 2025.

    Email your submission to FMSubmissions@mpi.govt.nz

    While we prefer email, you can post your submission to:

    Spatial Allocations
    Fisheries Management
    Fisheries New Zealand
    PO Box 2526
    Wellington 6140.

    Public notice

    A public notice about the call for submissions is scheduled to appear in the Gisborne Herald on Tuesday 20 May 2025.

    About temporary closures

    Section 186A of the Fisheries Act 1996 allows the Minister for Oceans and Fisheries to temporarily close an area, or temporarily restrict or prohibit the use of any fishing method in respect of an area, if satisfied that the closure, restriction, or prohibition will recognise and provide for the use and management practices of tangata whenua in the exercise of non-commercial fishing rights.

    Find out more about temporary closures

    Submissions are public information

    Note that all, part, or a summary of your submission may be published on this website. Most often this happens when we issue a document that reviews the submissions received.

    People can also ask for copies of submissions under the Official Information Act 1982 (OIA). The OIA says we must make the content of submissions available unless we have good reason for withholding it. Those reasons are detailed in sections 6 and 9 of the OIA.

    If you think there are grounds to withhold specific information from publication, make this clear in your submission or contact us. Reasons may include that it discloses commercially sensitive or personal information. However, any decision MPI makes to withhold details can be reviewed by the Ombudsman, who may direct us to release it.

    Official Information Act 1982 – NZ Legislation

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Less Than 1 Week Left To Apply for FEMA Assistance Following February Severe Storms and Flooding

    Source: US Federal Emergency Management Agency

    Headline: Less Than 1 Week Left To Apply for FEMA Assistance Following February Severe Storms and Flooding

    Less Than 1 Week Left To Apply for FEMA Assistance Following February Severe Storms and Flooding

    FRANKFORT, Ky

    – Homeowners and renters in Breathitt, Clay, Estill, Floyd, Harlan, Johnson, Knott, Lee, Leslie, Letcher, Martin, Owsley, Perry, Pike, Simpson and Woodford counties who experienced damage or losses caused by the February severe storms and floods have less than 1 week to apply for federal disaster assistance

    The deadline to apply for federal assistance is May 25

      Survivors of the April storms still have until June 25 to Apply

    How To Apply for FEMA AssistanceThere are several ways to apply for FEMA assistance:Online at DisasterAssistance

    gov

    Visit any Disaster Recovery Center

    To find a center close to you, visit fema

    gov/DRC, or text DRC along with your Zip Code to 43362 (Example: “DRC 29169”)

    Use the FEMA mobile app

    Call the FEMA Helpline at 800-621-3362

    It is open 7 a

    m

    to 10 p

    m

    Eastern Time

    Help is available in many languages

    If you use a relay service, such as Video Relay Service (VRS), captioned telephone or other service, give FEMA your number for that service

    FEMA works with every household on a case-by-case basis

    FEMA representatives can explain available assistance programs, how to apply to FEMA, and help connect survivors with resources for their recovery needs

    When you apply, you will need to provide:A current phone number where you can be contacted

    Your address at the time of the disaster and the address where you are now staying

    Your Social Security Number

    A general list of damage and losses

    Banking information if you choose direct deposit

    If insured, the policy number or the agent and/or the company name

    Survivors should keep their contact information updated with FEMA as the agency may need to call to schedule a home inspection or get additional information

     Disaster assistance is not a substitute for insurance and is not intended to compensate for all losses caused by a disaster

    The assistance is intended to meet basic needs and supplement disaster recovery efforts

     Homeowners and renters in Woodford County may be eligible for federal assistance, if you had property damage or loss in Woodford County from the February severe incident, and then again from the April severe incident, you would need to complete two separate disaster assistance applications

    For an accessible video on how to apply for FEMA assistance, go to youtube

    com/watch?v=WZGpWI2RCNw

     For more information about Kentucky flooding recovery, visit www

    fema

    gov/disaster/4860

    Follow the FEMA Region 4 X account at x

    com/femaregion4

     
    martyce

    allenjr
    Mon, 05/19/2025 – 15:09

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI: Licensed Crypto Mining Platforms Like F2Hash Redefine Global Landscape Amid Bitcoin Boom

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    New York City, NY, May 19, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) —

    In a landmark development for the digital asset industry, licensed and regulated cloud mining platforms are emerging as the backbone of Bitcoin’s post-$100K resurgence. Spearheaded by industry leaders such as F2Hash, the market is witnessing a profound shift from fragmented, independent miners to scalable, compliant, and sustainable infrastructure. As profitability metrics soar and institutional capital floods in, the global mining map is being redrawn—fast.

    F2Hash, among the top-tier mining entities, has become a symbol of this evolution. Founded in 2022 and headquartered in Nicosia, Cyprus, F2Hash operates with a licensed framework under CySEC and FINMA banking oversight. The platform now controls 12.5 EH/s of hash rate and achieves a remarkable 92% use of renewable energy, thanks to its integration with the EU’s Green Mining Initiative.

    “Mining is no longer a guessing game. Our mission is to bring structure, trust, and sustainability to the process,” said Konstantin Vassilev, CEO of F2Hash. “We’re not just adapting to this new era—we’re helping define it. With institutional confidence rising, it’s the platforms that offer transparency, compliance, and energy efficiency that will lead the charge.”

    Cloud mining in 2025 looks fundamentally different from years past. Instead of managing physical machines, users opt for mining contracts that leverage large-scale, high-efficiency facilities. ASIC hardware now achieves performance benchmarks upwards of 450 TH/s, enhanced by liquid cooling technologies that minimise energy loss. Profitability has jumped sharply, with licensed cloud contracts offering 18–24% ROI annually, outpacing home mining setups burdened by higher energy costs.

    According to recent industry data, licensed platforms now command over 65% of global hash power. This includes major players such as:

    • BitFuFu, a Bitmain-backed platform that raised $300M in Series C funding and operates under Dubai’s Virtual Asset Mining Law.
    • CryptMain, innovating with a nuclear-backed mining protocol, is leading in European markets.
    • BitDeer, publicly listed on NYSE, is known for its energy-optimised smart routing systems.
    • ECOS, an Armenian-based firm focused on carbon offset contracts and flexible terms.
    • NiceHash, the largest hash marketplace, which now offers institutional DeFi integration.
    • Hashing24, a veteran platform now bridging mining with Bitcoin Layer 2 infrastructure.

    F2Hash stands out not only for its performance but also for its operational model—offering fixed-term mining contracts with daily payouts and real-time monitoring dashboards for users. Its solar-powered data centers and instant withdrawal systems provide the scalability and environmental accountability regulators demand.

    As governments enforce tighter controls on energy usage and financial flows, platforms like F2Hash are well-positioned to benefit. The EU’s upcoming Climate-Neutral Mining Directive is expected to further favor regulated operators using renewable energy and advanced cooling systems, which can boost energy efficiency by 40%.

    Industry experts suggest that by 2026, up to 75% of global mining could be concentrated in regulated cloud platforms. Meanwhile, traditional financial institutions continue to enter the space, with mining-backed ETFs, structured investment products, and derivative instruments gaining traction.

    The crypto mining industry is shedding its anarchic roots and embracing structured, sustainable growth. For companies like F2Hash, this is more than a market shift—it’s the beginning of a new industrial era.

    For more information, visit F2Hash’s website or contact Nikolai Terskikh at support@f2hash.com.

    Media Contact Detailsz
    Contact Name:  Nikolai Terskikh
    Contact Email: info@f2hash.com
    City/Country: Dimofontos, Nicosia, Cyprus
    Website: https://f2hash.com

    Disclaimer: The information provided in this press release is not a solicitation for investment, nor is it intended as investment advice, financial advice, or trading advice. Cryptocurrency mining and staking involve risk. There is potential for loss of funds. You should practice due diligence, including consultation with a professional financial advisor, before investing in or trading cryptocurrency and securities.

    Attachment

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI USA: Reconciliation Recommendations of the House Committee on Natural Resources

    Source: US Congressional Budget Office

    Legislation Summary

    H. Con. Res. 14, the Concurrent Resolution on the Budget for Fiscal Year 2025, instructed the House Committee on Natural Resources to recommend legislative changes that would decrease deficits by not less than a specified amount over the 2025-2034 period. As part of the reconciliation process, the House Committee on Natural Resources approved legislation on May 6, 2025, with provisions that would decrease deficits.

    Estimated Federal Cost

    In CBO’s estimation, the reconciliation recommendations of the House Committee on Natural Resources would, on net, decrease deficits by $20.2 billionover the 2025-2034 period. The estimated budgetary effects of the legislation are shown in Table 1. The costs of the legislation fall within budget functions 300 (natural resources and environment) and 950 (undistributed offsetting receipts).

    Return to Reference

    Table 1.

    Estimated Budgetary Effects of Reconciliation Recommendations Title VIII, House Committee on Natural Resources, as Ordered Reported on May 6, 2025

     

    By Fiscal Year, Millions of Dollars

       
     

    2025

    2026

    2027

    2028

    2029

    2030

    2031

    2032

    2033

    2034

    2025-2029

    2025-2034

     

    Increases or Decreases (-) in Direct Spending

       

    Budget Authority

    2,018

    -575

    -835

    -1,722

    -1,748

    -2,437

    -2,698

    -3,146

    -3,835

    -4,355

    -2,862

    -19,333

    Estimated Outlays

    -122

    -521

    -659

    -1,523

    -1,504

    -2,224

    -2,254

    -2,693

    -3,377

    -4,096

    -4,329

    -18,973

     

    Increases in Revenues

       

    Estimated Revenues

    0

    65

    130

    130

    135

    140

    140

    145

    150

    150

    460

    1,185

     

    Net Decrease in the Deficit

    From Changes in Direct Spending and Revenues

       

    Effect on the Deficit

    -122

    -586

    -789

    -1,653

    -1,639

    -2,364

    -2,394

    -2,838

    -3,527

    -4,246

    -4,789

    -20,158

    Basis of Estimate

    For this estimate, CBO assumes that the legislation will be enacted in summer 2025. CBO’s estimates are relative to its January 2025 baseline and cover the period from 2025 through 2034. Outlays of directly appropriated amounts were estimated using historical obligation and spending rates for similar programs.

    CBO expects that the share of bonus bids, rents, and royalties from onshore oil, gas, coal, and renewable-energy production paid to states and counties would be subject to sequestration under the Budget Control Act of 2011. CBO estimates that a portion of those payments would be sequestered in each year, starting in 2027 and ending in 2032. However, in every subsequent year, starting in 2028 and ending in 2033, those amounts would be restored, resulting in a net zero budgetary effect over the 2025‑2034 period. CBO includes those effects in its estimates for sections 80101, 80111, 80121, 80122, 80141, 80144, 80181, 80301, 80303, 80304, and 80305.

    Direct Spending

    CBO estimates that enacting the legislation would decrease direct spending outlays by $19.0 billion over the 2025-2034 period (see Table 2).

    Subtitle A. Energy and Mineral Resources

    Subtitle A would require new lease sales on federal land for onshore and offshore oil and gas, coal, and renewable energy and would change permitting processes. CBO estimates that enacting the subtitle would decrease direct spending by $19.7 billion over the 2025-2034 period.

    Federally owned energy resources are developed under a leasing system that requires companies to bid on tracts of land. Winning bidders remit payments called bonus bids when leases are issued; pay annual rent on nonproducing leases; and pay royalties on the value of any oil, gas, coal, or electricity produced from the leased land. Those payments are recorded in the budget as offsetting receipts—that is, as reductions in direct spending. Unless otherwise noted, those fees are deposited in the Treasury.

    Part I. Oil and Gas

    Sections 80101 through 80105 would increase the minimum number of oil and gas lease sales required each year, reinstate noncompetitive oil and gas lease sales, establish permitting by rule for oil and gas drilling, expand the practice of commingling oil and gas production, and reduce royalty rates for new onshore oil and gas leases from 16.67 percent to 12.5 percent. Those sections interact and CBO has shown the estimates of their combined budgetary effects under section 80101.

    Onshore Oil and Gas Leasing Sales. Section 80101 would require the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) to conduct at least four onshore oil and gas lease sales each year in specified states where land is available for oil and gas development under the Mineral Leasing Act. Under current law, the Department of the Interior (DOI) has discretion to postpone or cancel oil and gas lease sales; the section would require BLM to conduct a replacement sale if a sale is canceled. CBO estimates that the resulting number of onshore oil and gas leases would increase by 1,300 annually, on average, over the 2025-2034 period.

    CBO estimates that the interactive effects of enacting this section and sections 80102 through 80105, discussed below, would increase offsetting receipts from bonus bids, rents, and royalties by $12.8 billion, on net, over the 2026-2034 period, after adjusting for the effects of sequestration.

    Noncompetitive Leasing. Section 80102 would reinstate BLM’s authority, rescinded by the 2022 reconciliation act, to award federal land for oil and gas development in noncompetitive leases if no successful bids are made in a competitive sale. Using data from the agency, CBO estimates that enacting the section would increase onshore oil and gas leasing by 150 to 180 leases each year, thus increasing oil and gas production and related collections of royalties over the 2025‑2034 period. This provision interacts with other sections and CBO has shown the estimated budgetary effects under section 80101.

    Permit Fees. Section 80103 would direct DOI to approve applications that allow operators to commingle onshore oil and gas production from multiple sources within a single well. Operators would be required to pay a $10,000 fee and install volume-measuring equipment to ensure appropriate oil and gas allocation and royalty payments. BLM currently allows onshore operators to commingle production under certain conditions; enacting this provision would expand that practice.

    Information from industry sources and BLM indicates that commingling can produce larger yields over shorter periods than is likely with permitting and drilling separate wells. CBO estimates that under this provision DOI would approve an average of 1,000 applications annually over the 2025‑2034 period; thus, royalty collections would increase relative to current law.

    Within two years of enactment, section 80103 also would require DOI to establish a permit-by-rule program. Under the program, leaseholders would purchase permits (at a cost of $5,000) allowing them to notify a permitting authority of their compliance with certain rules. That process would shorten the time to begin oil and gas development.

    Using information from industry sources and BLM, CBO estimates that under this provision, DOI would receive more than 3,000 applications annually over the 2025-2034 period. We expect that oil and gas production would accelerate by about 200 days, on average, increasing royalty payments relative to current law. CBO further expects that under section 80103, future leased parcels would become more valuable, increasing future bonus bids for onshore leases. This provision interacts with other sections and CBO has shown the estimated budgetary effects under section 80101.

    Permitting Fee for Non-Federal Land. Section 80104 would prohibit DOI from requiring permits to drill for oil and gas leases under certain conditions, including drilling in places where the federal government owns less than 50 percent of the minerals or does not own the surface of the drilling area. Operators would be required to pay a $5,000 fee for each lease. Using information from the agency, CBO estimates that fewer than 200 such cases would occur each year over the 2025-2034 period. CBO estimates that oil and gas production would accelerate by about a year in those cases, increasing royalties paid to the federal government. This provision interacts with other sections and CBO has shown the estimated budgetary effects under section 80101.

    Reinstate Reasonable Royalty Rates. Section 80105 would reinstate a royalty rate of 12.5 percent for new onshore oil and gas leases. The 2022 reconciliation act set the royalty rate at 16.67 percent. (The legislation would not affect the royalty rate for outstanding leases.) CBO expects that one effect of lowering the rate would be to reduce royalty receipts from new lease sales that CBO projects would occur under current law. CBO also expects that lowering the rate would increase oil and gas production on those sites, because of the potential for increased profits for operators and leaseholders, thus increasing royalty collections. In addition, CBO expects that future leased parcels would become more valuable, thus raising future bonus bids on onshore leases. This provision interacts with other sections and CBO has shown the estimated budgetary effects under section 80101.

    Under current law, through August 2032 the royalty rates for offshore oil and gas leases must be between 16.67 percent and 18.75 percent, and at least 16.67 percent after that. This provision would permanently set the rate between 12.5 percent and 18.75 percent. Based on royalty rates for recent oil and gas leasing, CBO expects that the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) would continue to impose a rate of 18.75 percent; on that basis, CBO expects that the legislation would not affect the royalty rate for future offshore oil and gas leases.

    Part II. Geothermal

    Sections 80111 and 80112 would require annual geothermal lease sales and exclude power plants outside of the leasing area from paying royalties on geothermal resources used by those plants. The two sections interact and CBO has shown the estimates of their combined budgetary effects under section 80111.

    Geothermal Leasing. Section 80111 would require DOI to hold annual geothermal lease sales and replace canceled or delayed sales within the same year. Sales would include parcels in each state that are eligible for geothermal development under the Federal Land and Management Act of 1976. Under current law, DOI holds geothermal lease sales every other year. Winning bidders remit bonus bids as leases are issued and they pay annual rent on nonproducing leases and royalties on the value of any electricity produced and sold from the leased land. Geothermal projects on federal land take between seven and nine years from leasing to electricity production, depending on permitting, exploration results, and financial resources.

    Using information from the industry and data from BLM, CBO estimates that under the legislation DOI would issue about 450 new leases through 2034. CBO estimates that, after sharing a portion of those receipts with states and counties where the activities occur, the legislation would increase net offsetting receipts by $23 million from bonus bids, rents, and royalties over the 2025-2034 period, after adjusting for sequestration.

    Geothermal Royalties. Section 80112 would exclude from royalty payments federal geothermal resources that support power plants located outside the boundaries of the federal geothermal leasing area. Under current law, using geothermal resources within or outside an area does not exempt lessees from paying royalties. Using data from BLM, CBO estimates that more than half of all power plants that access federal geothermal resources would be excluded from paying royalties under this provision, decreasing royalty payments under new leases.

    Part III. Alaska

    Part III would reinstate the Coastal Plain Oil and Gas Leasing Program and require new lease sales in the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska.

    Coastal Plain Oil and Gas Leasing. Section 80121 would require BLM to reinstate six leases canceled after the 2021 lease sale. CBO expects that the lessees would repay the $8 million for bonus bids they received in reimbursements after the cancellation and that they would pay rent totaling $3 million a year until production begins.

    This provision also would require BLM to conduct at least four oil and gas lease sales in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge within 10 years of enactment. BLM would be required to offer a minimum of 400,000 acres in each sale, or the total number of unleased acres available at the time of a sale. The legislation would require those sales to be conducted under terms established by the “Record of Decision for the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Coastal Plain Oil and Gas Leasing Program, Alaska,” dated August 21, 2020.

    Section 80121 also would require BLM to issue any rights-of-way, easements, permits, or other necessary authorizations for the exploration, development, production, and transportation of oil and gas under those leases. Those authorizations would be considered to satisfy all federal laws, including the Alaska National Interest Lands Act, Endangered Species Act, and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), and they would be exempted from judicial review. CBO expects that enacting those provisions would significantly increase the likelihood that companies would participate in each sale and the amount that companies would bid in those sales.

    Using information from BLM, the U.S. Geological Survey, and industry experts, CBO estimates that the reinstated and new leases awarded under the legislation would increase net offsetting receipts to the federal government by $946 million from bonus bids, rents, and royalties over the 2025-2034 period, after adjusting for sequestration. That amount is adjusted for sequestration and incorporates the 50 percent that would be paid to Alaska under current law.

    Estimates of bonus bids, rents, and royalties from leases in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge are uncertain. Potential bidders might make assumptions that are different from CBO’s, including assumptions about long-term oil prices, production costs, the amount of oil and gas resources in the area, production timelines, and alternative investment opportunities. The number of factors that affect companies’ investment and operation decisions result in wide ranges for bonus bids, rents, and royalties. CBO’s estimate represents the midpoint of those ranges.

    National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska. Section 80122 would direct DOI to resume the oil and gas leasing program under the Naval Petroleum Reserves Production Act of 1976, requiring a lease sale within one year of enactment, and every two years thereafter. Under regulations issued in 2020, BLM would offer a minimum of 4 million acres in each sale. The legislation would deem all sales to meet environmental requirements established in NEPA.

    Using information from BLM, the U.S. Geological Survey, and industry groups, CBO estimates that bonus bids, rents, and royalties from the reinstated and new leases would increase net offsetting receipts by $532 million over the 2025‑2034 period, after adjusting for sequestration. That amount is adjusted for sequestration and incorporates the 50 percent that would be paid to Alaska under current law.

    Part IV. Mining

    Part IV would reinstate mining leases in national forest land in the state of Minnesota and require the necessary approvals and permits for a new road in Alaska.

    Superior National Forest Lands in Minnesota. Section 80131 would rescind an order issued by BLM in 2023 that was effective for a period of 20 years and subject to valid existing rights. That order withdrew more than 225,000 acres of National Forest System land in Minnesota from mineral and geothermal leasing. This provision would require the Departments of Agriculture and the Interior to reissue all mineral leases for a 20-year term with an option for renewal. The remaining terms of the reinstated leases would be as they were originally and the leases would be exempt from judicial review.

    Using information from BLM on the leases’ terms, CBO expects that leaseholders would pay combined annual rent and minimum royalties of about $400,000 and would pay a 6 percent royalty on the gross value of minerals mined. Based on information from the industry, CBO expects that state and local permitting and preproduction activities would take about seven years to complete. Because of uncertainty about when and whether leaseholders would obtain the necessary state permits, CBO used a 50 percent probability that production would begin after 2031 but before 2034. On that basis, CBO estimates that the federal government would collect $81 million in rents and royalties over the 2025-2034 period.

    Ambler Road in Alaska. Section 80132 would require federal approval for rights-of-way, permits, licenses, leases, and any other authorizations needed to access public land for the construction of the Ambler Road across the western unit of the Gates of the Arctic National Preserve and the Central Yukon Planning Area in Alaska. All authorizations would be granted under the 2020 Ambler Road Environmental Impact Statement and would be exempt from judicial review. This provision also would establish an annual rent of $500,000 from 2025 through 2034. CBO estimates that enacting the provision would reduce direct spending by $4 million over the 2025-2034 period.

    Part V. Coal

    Part V would require DOI to rescind the temporary pause on coal leasing and reduce the royalty rate on existing and new coal leases. Sections 80141 through 80143 interact and CBO has shown the estimates of their combined budgetary effects under section 80141.

    Coal Leasing. Section 80141 would direct DOI to process and approve qualified applications for coal leases and provide any necessary approvals for mining. The legislation also would require DOI to make available a minimum of 4 million additional acres with known recoverable coal reserves in the lower 48 states and Alaska. That requirement would exclude national parks and monuments as well as historic, wilderness, recreational, and conservation areas. After adjusting for the effects of sequestration, CBO estimates that the bonus bids, rents, and royalties would increase offsetting receipts by $237 million over the 2025‑2034 period.

    Future Coal Leasing. Section 80142 would rescind a 2016 Secretarial Order from DOI that paused the issuance of new federal leases for thermal coal. This provision interacts with section 80141 and CBO has shown the estimated budgetary effects under that section.

    Coal Royalty. Section 80143 would reduce the royalty rate on federal coal leases from 12.5 percent to 7 percent. That rate would apply to existing and new leases from the date of enactment through September 30, 2034. CBO estimates that the reduction would increase direct spending during the same period by reducing offsetting receipts. This section interacts with section 80141 and CBO has shown the estimated budgetary effects under that section.

    Authorization to Mine Federal Minerals. Section 80144 would authorize the mining of all coal reserves under certain federal coal leases previously issued for about 800 acres in Montana. Mining authorizations would be provided in accordance with a 2020 mining plan modification. Using information from BLM, CBO estimates that enacting the provision would increase net royalties by $42 million in the 2025‑2034 period, after sharing 50 percent of the total receipts with the state of Montana. The estimate is adjusted for the effects of sequestration.

    Part VI. NEPA

    Part VI would authorize sponsors of projects that require environmental assessments or environmental impact statements under NEPA to pay a fee to potentially expedite completion of the assessments or statements and for exemption from judicial review.

    Project Sponsor Opt-In Fees for Environmental Reviews. Section 80151 would authorize sponsors of projects that require environmental assessments or environmental impact statements under NEPA to pay a fee for a potentially expedited completion of the assessment or statement and for exemption from judicial review. The fee would be set at 125 percent of the anticipated costs to prepare or supervise the preparation of the assessment or statement.

    CBO expects that the exemption from judicial review would accelerate the start date of some large, federally funded transportation, energy, and infrastructure projects that otherwise would have been delayed by litigation. Based on NEPA litigation data and factoring in the chance that projects would be delayed by other litigation (for example, challenges under the Endangered Species Act), CBO anticipates that enacting section 80151 would accelerate those projects by about two years. We also expect that some federally funded projects that would have been permanently stopped by a challenge under current law would commence under this provision. CBO estimates that accelerating or starting those formerly delayed or stopped projects would increase direct spending by $190 million over the 2025-2034 period. (CBO expects that federal funds for those projects would have been spent more slowly or would not have been spent at all, under current law.)

    Finally, CBO expects that enacting section 80151 would accelerate the start of some energy projects on federal land, increasing the collection of rents and royalties over the 2025-2034 period. Those effects are included as interactive effects in other sections.

    Rescission Relating to Environmental and Climate Data Collection. Section 80152 would rescind the unobligated balances of funds directly appropriated in the 2022 reconciliation act to the Council on Environmental Quality. Using information from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), CBO estimates that enacting this provision would decrease direct spending by $25 million over the 2025-2034 period.

    Part VII. Miscellaneous

    Part VII would require a fee for the filing of protests against oil and gas lease sales. The receipts collected under the provision would reduce direct spending.

    Protest Fees. Section 80161 would establish filing fees to submit protests against oil and gas lease sales; the fees would depend on the number of pages and protests in each filing. Using data from BLM on protests and the estimated increases in oil and gas leasing under the legislation, CBO estimates that enacting the provision would increase offsetting receipts by $5 million over the 2025-2034 period.

    Part VIII. Offshore Oil and Gas Leasing

    Part VIII would require new sales of offshore oil and gas leases, authorize the commingling of offshore oil production from multiple reservoirs within a single well under certain conditions, and increase the amount of energy receipts that may be distributed to states and conservation programs. Sections 80171 and 80172 interact and CBO has shown the combined estimates of their budgetary effects under section 80171.

    Mandatory Offshore Oil and Gas Lease Sales. Section 80171 would require BOEM to hold at least 30 lease sales in the Gulf of America during the 15 years after enactment and 6 lease sales in Alaska’s Cook Inlet during the 10 years after enactment. Those sales would be held annually according to a schedule described in the legislation.

    In September 2023, BOEM released its five-year plan for holding Outer Continental Shelf oil and gas lease sales during the 2024-2029 period. The Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act requires BOEM to issue leasing schedules; any significant revisions require a process for consultation and rulemaking. Under the current five-year plan, the agency intends to hold two more sales in the gulf: one each in 2027 and 2029. The plan does not include sales in the Alaska Outer Continental Shelf. The legislation would authorize BOEM to hold the new sales in addition to those in the five-year plan.

    CBO expects that, under the legislation, BOEM would hold 24 additional offshore oil and gas sales by the end of 2034: 18 in the gulf and 6 in the Cook Inlet. Because planning and executing a lease sale takes between six months and two years, CBO expects that the sale that the legislation would require before August 15, 2025, would occur in a later year. CBO estimates that new offshore lease sales would generate $6.3 billion in bonus bids, rents, and royalties over the 2026-2034 period. That estimate includes the effects of enacting section 80172.

    Offshore Commingling. Section 80172 would require DOI to approve operator requests to commingle offshore oil production from multiple reservoirs within a single well unless there is conclusive evidence that safety is threatened or aggregate production could decline. The Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement currently generally allows offshore leaseholders to commingle production if the pressure differential between reservoirs is under 200 pounds per square inch, though in one region, that differential is set at below 1,500 pounds per square inch. The legislation would authorize commingling at any pressure differential if safety and production are unaffected.

    According to academic research and industry feedback, commingled wells can be more productive, on average, than sequential wells. On that basis, CBO expects that enacting the provision would increase the number of commingled wells, leading to increased production. CBO also expects that future leased tracts would become more valuable, increasing the amount of future bonus bids on offshore leases.

    Using information from BOEM, the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement, and industry groups, CBO expects that the provision would increase offsetting receipts relative to current law. This section interacts with section 80171 and CBO has shown its effects in the estimate for that section.

    Limitations of Amount of Distributed Qualified Outer Continental Shelf Revenues. Section 80173 would amend the Gulf of Mexico Energy Security Act of 2006 to increase the amount of energy receipts that may be distributed to states and conservation programs. Under current law, not more than $500 million in receipts collected from leases entered into on or after December 2006 may be distributed in each year through 2055; the legislation would allow up to $650 million to be distributed in each year through 2034. CBO expects that the new funding resulting from increasing the cap would be subject to sequestration beginning in 2027, which would reduce spending by about $50 million over the 2027-2032 period. Accounting for sequestration, CBO estimates that increasing the cap to $650 million would increase direct spending outlays by $1.2 billion over the 2025-2034 period.

    Part IX. Renewable Energy

    Part IX would establish a standard formula to calculate the capacity fee (an equivalent to royalty payment) paid to the federal government under geothermal leases and require the Treasury to distribute a part of those receipts to the states and counties where the operations take place. Sections 80181 and 80182 interact and CBO has shown the estimate of their combined budgetary effects in the estimate for section 80181.

    Renewable Energy Fees on Federal Lands. Section 80181 would establish a formula to calculate rental rates and the capacity fees paid to the federal government under solar and wind leases on federal land. A capacity fee is a royalty based on the energy produced and sold under those leases. Under current law, BLM establishes and can modify those formulas by rule. The capacity fee calculation under this provision would apply to existing and new leases and would, in CBO’s estimation, increase the total offsetting receipts collected relative to current law. Using information from BLM on current and estimated future wind and solar projects, CBO estimates that enacting the provision would increase offsetting receipts by $180 million over the 2025-2034 period, after adjusting for the effects of sequestration.

    Renewable Energy Revenue Sharing. Section 80182 would require the Treasury to distribute 25 percent of the offsetting receipts from wind and solar leases on federal land to the states and counties where those operations take place. The federal government does not currently distribute any of those receipts to states. CBO estimates that enacting this provision would increase direct spending over the 2025-2034 period. This section interacts with section 80181 and CBO has shown its budgetary effects in the estimate for section 80181.

    Subtitle B. Water, Wildlife, and Fisheries

    Subtitle B would rescind certain unobligated balances from funds directly appropriated in the 2022 reconciliation act and provide funding for water storage and conveyance activities. CBO estimates that enacting the subtitle would increase outlays, on net, by $2.4 billion over the 2025-2034 period.

    Rescission of Funds. Sections 80201 and 80202 would rescind certain unobligated balances of funds directly appropriated in the 2022 reconciliation act. Using information from OMB, CBO estimates that enacting those sections would decrease outlays over the 2025-2034 period by the following amounts:

    • $100 million for Investing in Coastal Communities and Climate Resilience; and

    $29 million for Facilities of National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

    Surface Water Storage Enhancement. Section 80203 would provide $2 billion in 2025 to the Bureau of Reclamation (BOR) to increase the capacity of existing surface water storage facilities. The section also would exempt those funds from cost-sharing, matching, and reimbursement requirements, which are typical for financing projects for developing water storage.

    CBO expects that the funds would allow BOR to move forward with the Shasta Dam and Reservoir Enlargement Project by removing the requirement to engage a nonfederal partner. Based on historical spending patterns and information from the agency, CBO estimates that enacting this provision would increase direct spending by $2 billion over the 2025-2034 period.

    Water Conveyance Enhancement. Section 80204 would directly appropriate $500 million in 2025 to BOR to increase the capacity of existing water conveyance facilities. Based on historical spending patterns and information from the agency, CBO expects that the amounts provided would be fully spent over the 2025-2034 period.

    Section 80204 also would exempt the amounts provided from cost-sharing, matching, and reimbursement requirements, which are typical for financing conveyance projects. That could affect spending subject to appropriation, but CBO has not reviewed this provision for such effects.

    Subtitle C. Federal Lands

    Subtitle C would prohibit BLM from implementing certain resource management plans and rescind unobligated funds from the Forest Service and BLM. CBO estimates that enacting the subtitle would decrease direct spending by $1.6 billion over the 2025-2034 period.

    Prohibition on the Implementation of Field Office Management Plans. Sections 80301 through 80305 would prohibit DOI from implementing, administering, or enforcing five BLM Resource Management Plans made final between October 2024 and January 2025 for the Rock Springs and Buffalo Field Offices in Wyoming, the Miles City Field Office in Montana, a statewide plan for North Dakota, and the Colorado River Valley and Grand Junction Field Offices in Colorado. After adjusting for the effects of sequestration, CBO estimates that enacting those provisions would decrease direct spending by a total of $261 million over the 2026-2034 period.

    Rescissions of Funds. Sections 80306, 80307, 80308, and 80309 would rescind certain unobligated balances of funds directly appropriated in the 2022 reconciliation act. Using information from the OMB, CBO estimates that enacting those rescissions would decrease outlays over the 2025-2034 period by $287 million for the Forest Service, the National Park Service, and BLM.

    Celebrating America’s 250th Anniversary. Section 80310 would provide $190 million for DOI to commemorate the 250th anniversary of the founding of the United States of America and establish and maintain a statuary park named the National Garden of American Heroes. Based on historical spending patterns, CBO expects that the directly appropriated amounts would be fully spent over the 2025-2034 period.

    Long-Term Contracts for the Forest Service. Section 80311 would require the Forest Service to enter into at least one 20-year contract for timber harvesting per region each year over the 2025-2029 period. CBO expects that the sales required within one year of enactment would occur in a later year.

    This section would establish the contracts’ terms and conditions. Under current law, proceeds from national forests’ timber sales are deposited into various funds, depending on the authority under which the sale is conducted; amounts deposited into those funds can be spent without further appropriation. This provision would require the proceeds from the sales conducted under the legislation to be deposited in the Treasury. Thus, CBO estimates that enacting the provision would decrease direct spending over the 2025-2034 period.

    CBO estimates that section 80311 would interact with section 80313. That section would require the Forest Service to harvest and sell a minimum of 25 percent more timber than the amounts it sold in fiscal year 2024.

    CBO estimates that of the additional timber sales conducted under section 80313, half could be harvested through the required long-term contracts. Using data on timber sales and accounting for the interaction between the two sections, CBO estimates that enacting those sections would increase offsetting receipts by $111 million over the 2025-2034 period.

    Long-Term Contracts for the Bureau of Land Management. Section 80312 would require BLM to enter at least one 20-year contract for timber harvesting per region each year over the 2025-2029 period.

    This section would establish the contracts’ terms and conditions. Under current law, most proceeds of timber sales on public land under the jurisdiction of BLM are deposited into various funds depending on the authority under which the sale is conducted; amounts deposited into those funds can be spent without further appropriation. This provision would require the proceeds from the sales conducted under the legislation to be deposited in the Treasury as offsetting receipts. Thus, CBO estimates that enacting the provision would decrease direct spending over the 2025-2034 period.

    CBO estimates that half of the timber sold under section 80314 could be harvested under long-term contracts. That section would require BLM to harvest and sell a minimum of 25 percent more timber than it sold in fiscal year 2024. Using data on timber sales and accounting for the interaction between the sections, CBO estimates that enacting those sections would increase offsetting receipts by $46 million over the 2025-2034 period. Furthermore, CBO expects that the sales required within a year of enactment would occur in a later year. CBO expects that section 80312 would interact with section 80314 and the combined estimated budgetary effects are shown in the estimate for section 80312.

    Bureau of Land Management Land in Nevada. Section 80315 would direct DOI to identify and convey federal land, managed by BLM, in non-metropolitan areas of four counties in Nevada. The provision would require BLM to sell the land below fair-market value upon request by certain counties to use it for affordable housing. Otherwise, the land would be sold or exchanged for a price that is at or above fair-market value. Proceeds from those sales are recorded in the budget as offsetting receipts.

    Based on public maps describing available land for disposal in the state and information from BLM, CBO estimates that roughly 400,000 acres are identified for conveyance under this section. Much of that land is in Pershing County and is estimated to be encumbered with mining claims, millsites, or tunnel sites (roughly 250,000 acres). Encumbered land would be offered at fair-market value to the owner of the encumbrance under this section, and CBO expects that those acres would be conveyed over the 2025‑2034 period. For the remaining acres, CBO used a 50 percent probability that some of the available land would be identified for disposal and a 50 percent probability that the land so identified would be conveyed. On that basis, CBO estimates that 40,000 acres would be conveyed under the legislation over the next 10 years.

    Using information from DOI, related organizations, and past land sales in the state, CBO estimates that enacting this section would reduce direct spending by $819 million over the 2025-2034 period.

    Forest Service Land in Nevada. Section 80316 would direct the Department of Agriculture to identify and convey federal land managed by the Forest Service in Washoe County, Nevada. The provision would require the department to sell the land below fair-market value upon request by the county to use for affordable housing. Otherwise, the land would be sold at or above fair-market value. Proceeds from the sales would be recorded in the budget as offsetting receipts. Based on information from other land sales, CBO estimates that enacting section 80316 would reduce direct spending by $7 million over the 2025-2034 period.

    Federal Land in Utah. Section 80317 would require DOI to convey roughly 11,000 acres of federal land managed by BLM in Utah. The section would require DOI to sell the land at or above fair-market value. CBO expects that identifying and conveying the land would take several years. Proceeds from the sales would be recorded in the budget as offsetting receipts Using information on land values from BLM, CBO estimates that enacting section 80317 would reduce direct spending by $293 million over the 2025-2034 period.

    Revenues

    Enacting the legislation would increase revenues by $1.2 billion over the 2025-2034 period. (see On that basis, CBO estimates that enacting section 80151 would increase revenues, on net, by $1.2 billion over the 2025-2034 period.

    Uncertainty

    Many of CBO’s estimates for spending and revenues are subject to uncertainty because they rely on underlying projections and other estimates that are themselves uncertain.

    Several areas of the legislation are subject to particular uncertainty:

    • Projecting bonus bids, rents, and royalties from onshore and offshore oil, gas, and coal leasing depends on future prices of those fuels and minerals, the number of new leases that would begin production within the 10-year window, and the amount of production per lease, all of which are subject to market conditions and individual responses by public and private-sector entities;
    • Projecting bonus bids, rents, and royalties from renewable-energy leases depends on future prices of electricity and grid capacity, the number of new leases that would produce electricity, and the amount of electricity produced per lease, all of which are subject to market conditions and individual responses by public and private-sector entities;
    • Estimating bonus bids for leases in the National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska and the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge requires CBO to make assumptions that might differ from those of potential bidders, including our projections of long-term oil and gas prices and estimated production costs. For more information about the uncertainty of the estimates related to Alaska, see the discussion above in the section “Part III. Alaska”;
    • Anticipating market conditions and the risk tolerance of nonfederal entities make it difficult to project the amount of fees that those entities would pay for exemptions from judicial review under section 80151;
    • Projecting timelines is difficult for federally funded projects that could accelerate or newly start because of the judicial review provision; and
    • Projecting receipts from the conveyance of federal land in Nevada and Utah because of uncertain timelines, land value, and acreage.

    Pay-As-You-Go Considerations

    The Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010 establishes budget-reporting and enforcement procedures for legislation affecting direct spending or revenues. The net changes in outlays and revenues that are subject to those pay-as-you-go procedures are shown in Acting Chief, Natural and Physical Resources Cost Estimates Unit

    Kathleen FitzGerald
    Chief, Public and Private Mandates Unit

    Christina Hawley Anthony
    Deputy Director of Budget Analysis

    H. Samuel Papenfuss 
    Deputy Director of Budget Analysis

    Chad Chirico 
    Director of Budget Analysis

    Phillip L. Swagel

    Director, Congressional Budget Office

    Table 2.

    Estimated Changes in Direct Spending and Revenues Under Reconciliation Recommendations Title VIII, Committee on Natural Resources, as Ordered Reported on May 6, 2025

     

    By Fiscal Year, Millions of Dollars

       
     

    2025

    2026

    2027

    2028

    2029

    2030

    2031

    2032

    2033

    2034

    2025-2029

    2025-2034

     

    Increases or Decreases (-) in Direct Spending

       

    Subtitle A. Energy and Mineral Resources

                       

    Part I. Oil and Gas

                           

    Sec. 80101, Onshore Oil and Gas Lease Salesa

                         

    Budget Authority

    0

    -210

    -686

    -1,102

    -1,333

    -1,552

    -1,730

    -1,854

    -2,043

    -2,260

    -3,331

    -12,770

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    -210

    -686

    -1,102

    -1,333

    -1,552

    -1,730

    -1,854

    -2,043

    -2,260

    -3,331

    -12,770

    Part II: Geothermal

                           

    Sec. 80111, Geothermal Leasingb

                         

    Budget Authority

    0

    -1

    -1

    -2

    -2

    -3

    -3

    -3

    -3

    -5

    -6

    -23

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    -1

    -1

    -2

    -2

    -3

    -3

    -3

    -3

    -5

    -6

    -23

    Part III. Alaska

                           

    Sec. 80121, Coastal Plain Oil and Gas Leasing

                           

    Budget Authority

    0

    -219

    -3

    -15

    -2

    -15

    -3

    -16

    -332

    -341

    -239

    -946

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    -219

    -3

    -15

    -2

    -15

    -3

    -16

    -332

    -341

    -239

    -946

    Sec. 80122, National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska

                           

    Budget Authority

    0

    -80

    -5

    -90

    -6

    -95

    -11

    -97

    -34

    -114

    -181

    -532

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    -80

    -5

    -90

    -6

    -95

    -11

    -97

    -34

    -114

    -181

    -532

    Part IV. Mining

                           

    Sec. 80131, Superior National Forest Lands in Minnesota

                         

    Budget Authority

    -1

    *

    -1

    *

    -1

    *

    -1

    -22

    -28

    -27

    -3

    -81

    Estimated Outlays

    -1

    *

    -1

    *

    -1

    *

    -1

    -22

    -28

    -27

    -3

    -81

    Sec. 80132, Ambler Road in Alaska

                         

    Budget Authority

    0

    *

    -1

    *

    -1

    *

    -1

    *

    -1

    *

    -2

    -4

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    *

    -1

    *

    -1

    *

    -1

    *

    -1

    *

    -2

    -4

    Part V. Coal

                           

    Sec. 80141, Coal Leasingc

                           

    Budget Authority

    0

    84

    67

    61

    57

    -107

    -101

    -98

    -99

    -101

    269

    -237

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    84

    67

    61

    57

    -107

    -101

    -98

    -99

    -101

    269

    -237

    Sec. 80144, Authorization to Mine Federal Minerals

                           

    Budget Authority

    0

    -14

    -15

    -14

    1

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -42

    -42

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    -14

    -15

    -14

    1

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -42

    -42

                         

    (Continued)

    Table 2.

    Estimated Changes in Direct Spending and Revenues Under Reconciliation Recommendations Title VIII, Committee on Natural Resources, as Ordered Reported on May 6, 2025

    (Continued)

     

    By Fiscal Year, Millions of Dollars

       
     

    2025

    2026

    2027

    2028

    2029

    2030

    2031

    2032

    2033

    2034

    2025-2029

    2025-2034

     

    Increases or Decreases (-) in Direct Spending

       

    Part VI. NEPA

                           

    Sec. 80151, Project Sponsor Opt-In Fees for Environmental Reviews

                         

    Budget Authority

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    0

    *

    5

    15

    25

    30

    35

    40

    40

    20

    190

    Sec. 80152, Rescission Relating to Environmental and Data Collection

                         

    Budget Authority

    -25

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -25

    -25

    Estimated Outlays

    -7

    -6

    -6

    -6

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -25

    -25

    Part VII. Miscellaneous

                           

    Sec. 80161, Protest Fees

                           

    Budget Authority

    0

    *

    -1

    *

    -1

    *

    -1

    *

    -2

    *

    -2

    -5

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    *

    -1

    *

    -1

    *

    -1

    *

    -2

    *

    -2

    -5

    Part VIII: Offshore Oil and Gas Leasing

                       

    Sec. 80171, Mandatory Offshore Oil and Gas Lease Salesd

                         

    Budget Authority

    0

    -160

    -170

    -530

    -390

    -540

    -800

    -1,010

    -1,240

    -1,450

    -1,250

    -6,290

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    -160

    -170

    -530

    -390

    -540

    -800

    -1,010

    -1,240

    -1,450

    -1,250

    -6,290

    Sec. 80173, Limitations on Amount of Distributed Qualified Outer Continental Shelf Revenues

                       

    Budget Authority

    0

    150

    140

    140

    140

    140

    140

    145

    150

    150

    570

    1,295

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    120

    120

    130

    140

    140

    140

    145

    150

    150

    510

    1,235

    Part IX: Renewable Energy

                           

    Sec. 80181, Renewable Energy Fees on Federal Landse

                         

    Budget Authority

    0

    -5

    -5

    -6

    -13

    -21

    -28

    -27

    -37

    -38

    -29

    -180

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    -5

    -5

    -6

    -13

    -21

    -28

    -27

    -37

    -38

    -29

    -180

                         

    (Continued)

    Table 2.

    Estimated Changes in Direct Spending and Revenues Under Reconciliation Recommendations Title VIII, Committee on Natural Resources, as Ordered Reported on May 6, 2025

    (Continued)

     

    By Fiscal Year, Millions of Dollars

       
     

    2025

    2026

    2027

    2028

    2029

    2030

    2031

    2032

    2033

    2034

    2025-2029

    2025-2034

     

    Increases or Decreases (-) in Direct Spending

       

    Subtitle B: Water, Wildlife, and Fisheries

                       

    Sec. 80201, Rescission of Funds for Investing in Coastal Communities and Climate Resilience

                       

    Budget Authority

    -280

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -280

    -280

    Estimated Outlays

    -40

    -20

    -15

    -15

    -10

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -100

    -100

    Sec. 80202, Rescission of Funds for Facilities of National Atmospheric Administration and National Marine Sanctuaries

                       

    Budget Authority

    -29

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -29

    -29

    Estimated Outlays

    -7

    -7

    -7

    -6

    -2

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -29

    -29

    Sec. 80203, Surface Water Storage Enhancement

                           

    Budget Authority

    2,000

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    2,000

    2,000

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    31

    71

    108

    109

    209

    417

    418

    418

    219

    319

    2,000

    Sec. 80204, Water Conveyance Enhancement

                         

    Budget Authority

    500

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    500

    500

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    25

    175

    150

    150

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    500

    500

    Subtitle C: Federal Lands

                           

    Sec. 80301, Prohibition on the Implementation of the Rock Springs Field Office, Wyoming, Resource Management Plan

                       

    Budget Authority

    0

    -4

    *

    *

    -21

    -24

    -26

    -29

    -29

    -30

    -25

    -163

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    -4

    *

    *

    -21

    -24

    -26

    -29

    -29

    -30

    -25

    -163

    Sec. 80303, Prohibition on the Implementation of the Miles City Field Office, Montana, Resource Management Plan

                       

    Budget Authority

    0

    -3

    -3

    -3

    -3

    -4

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -12

    -16

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    -3

    -3

    -3

    -3

    -4

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -12

    -16

    Sec. 80304, Prohibition on the Implementation of the North Dakota Resource Management Plan

                       

    Budget Authority

    0

    -4

    *

    *

    *

    *

    -1

    *

    *

    *

    -4

    -5

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    -4

    *

    *

    *

    *

    -1

    *

    *

    *

    -4

    -5

    Sec. 80305, Prohibition on the Implementation of the Colorado River Valley Field Office and Grand Junction Field Office Resource Management Plans

                       

    Budget Authority

    0

    -4

    *

    *

    -12

    -12

    -12

    -12

    -12

    -13

    -16

    -77

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    -4

    *

    *

    -12

    -12

    -12

    -12

    -12

    -13

    -16

    -77

                         

    (Continued)

    Table 2.

    Estimated Changes in Direct Spending and Revenues Under Reconciliation Recommendations Title VIII, Committee on Natural Resources, as Ordered Reported on May 6, 2025

    (Continued)

     

    By Fiscal Year, Millions of Dollars

       
     

    2025

    2026

    2027

    2028

    2029

    2030

    2031

    2032

    2033

    2034

    2025-2029

    2025-2034

     

    Increases or Decreases (-) in Direct Spending

       

    Sec. 80306, Rescission of Forest Service Funds

                         

    Budget Authority

    -8

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -8

    -8

    Estimated Outlays

    -3

    -2

    -1

    -1

    -1

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -8

    -8

    Sec. 80307, Rescission of National Park Service and Bureau of Land Management Funds

                       

    Budget Authority

    -7

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -7

    -7

    Estimated Outlays

    -2

    -1

    -1

    -1

    -1

    -1

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -6

    -7

    Sec. 80308, Rescission of Bureau of Land Management and National Park Service Funds

                       

    Budget Authority

    -5

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -5

    -5

    Estimated Outlays

    -2

    -1

    -1

    -1

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -5

    -5

    Sec. 80309, Rescission of National Park Service Funds

                           

    Budget Authority

    -317

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -317

    -317

    Estimated Outlays

    -75

    -63

    -44

    -36

    -26

    -20

    -3

    0

    0

    0

    -244

    -267

    Sec. 80310, Celebrating America’s 250th Anniversary

                           

    Budget Authority

    190

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    190

    190

    Estimated Outlays

    15

    128

    25

    12

    10

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    190

    190

    Sec. 80311, Long-Term Contracts for the Forest Servicef

                         

    Budget Authority

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -19

    -21

    -22

    -24

    -25

    0

    -111

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -19

    -21

    -22

    -24

    -25

    0

    -111

    Sec. 80312, Long-Term Contracts for the Bureau of Land Managementg

                         

    Budget Authority

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -8

    -8

    -10

    -10

    -10

    0

    -46

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -8

    -8

    -10

    -10

    -10

    0

    -46

    Sec. 80315, Bureau of Land Management Land in Nevada

                         

    Budget Authority

    0

    -91

    -91

    -91

    -91

    -91

    -91

    -91

    -91

    -91

    -364

    -819

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    -91

    -91

    -91

    -91

    -91

    -91

    -91

    -91

    -91

    -364

    -819

    Sec. 80316, Forest Service Land in Nevada

                           

    Budget Authority

    0

    -3

    -4

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -7

    -7

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    -3

    -4

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -7

    -7

    Sec. 80317, Federal Land in Utah

                         

    Budget Authority

    0

    -11

    -56

    -70

    -70

    -86

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -207

    -293

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    -11

    -56

    -70

    -70

    -86

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -207

    -293

                         

    (Continued)

    Table 2.

    Estimated Changes in Direct Spending and Revenues Under Reconciliation Recommendations Title VIII, Committee on Natural Resources, as Ordered Reported on May 6, 2025

    (Continued)

     

    By Fiscal Year, Millions of Dollars

       
     

    2025

    2026

    2027

    2028

    2029

    2030

    2031

    2032

    2033

    2034

    2025-2029

    2025-2034

     

    Increases or Decreases (-) in Direct Spending

       

    Total Changes

                           

    Budget Authority

    2,018

    -575

    -835

    -1,722

    -1,748

    -2,437

    -2,698

    -3,146

    -3,835

    -4,355

    -2,862

    -19,333

    Estimated Outlays

    -122

    -521

    -659

    -1,523

    -1,504

    -2,224

    -2,254

    -2,693

    -3,377

    -4,096

    -4,329

    -18,973

     

    Increases in Revenues

       

    Sec. 80151, Project Sponsor Opt-In Fees for Environmental Reviews

                         

    Estimated Revenues

    0

    65

    130

    130

    135

    140

    140

    145

    150

    150

    460

    1,185

    Total Changes

                           

    Estimated Revenues

    0

    65

    130

    130

    135

    140

    140

    145

    150

    150

    460

    1,185

     

    Net Decrease in the Deficit

    From Changes in Direct Spending and Revenues

       

    Effect on the Deficit

    -122

    -586

    -789

    -1,653

    -1,639

    -2,364

    -2,394

    -2,838

    -3,527

    -4,246

    -4,789

    -20,158

    a. Includes amounts for sections 80102, 80103, 80104, and 80105.

    b. Includes amounts for section 80112.

    c. Includes amounts for sections 80142, 80143, and 80302.

    d. Includes amounts for section 80172.

    e. Includes amounts for section 80182.

    f. Includes amounts for section 80313.

    g. Includes amounts for section 80314.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Portugal: EIB provides €300 million loan to support the rehabilitation of state-funded schools

    Source: European Investment Bank

    • The €300 million loan will help to modernise state-funded primary and secondary schools across the country.
    • This investment covers projects to improve safety, accessibility and energy efficiency in school buildings.

    The European Investment Bank (EIB) has signed a €300 million financing agreement with Portugal to co-finance the School Restoration and Rehabilitation Programme, which aims to modernise hundreds of state-funded schools across the country. The agreement was signed by the Portuguese Treasury and Public Debt Management Agency (IGCP).

    This is one of the most significant operations for public investment in education in recent decades, and will contribute directly to the European priorities of social infrastructure, cohesion, climate action and sustainable development.

    Thanks to these funds, at least 499 schools will be able to apply for assistance to undertake works to upgrade and expand their buildings, or to construct new schools, with a view to providing safer, more modern, more inclusive and more energy-efficient learning environments.

    Modernising schools will help to significantly improve teaching and learning environments, while also helping to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by improving energy efficiency in school buildings.

    The project contributes to the EIB’s objectives with regards to climate action, environmental sustainability, and economic and social cohesion. This programme will also receive additional support through national and European funding instruments.

    Background information

    The European Investment Bank (ElB) is the long-term lending institution of the European Union, owned by its Member States. Built around eight core priorities, the EIB finances investments that contribute to EU policy objectives by bolstering climate action and the environment, digitalisation and technological innovation, security and defence, cohesion, agriculture and bioeconomy, social infrastructure, high-impact investments outside the European Union and the capital markets union.

    The EIB Group, which includes the European Investment Fund (EIF), signed almost €89 billion in new financing for over 900 high-impact projects in 2024, boosting Europe’s competitiveness and security.

    All projects financed by the EIB Group are in line with the Paris Climate Agreement, as pledged in our Climate Bank Roadmap. Almost 60% of the EIB Group’s annual financing supports projects directly contributing to climate change mitigation, adaptation, and a healthier environment.

    Fostering market integration and mobilising investment, the Group supported a record of over €100 billion in new investment for Europe’s energy security in 2024 and mobilised €110 billion in growth capital for startups, scale-ups and European pioneers. Around half of the EIB’s financing within the European Union is directed towards cohesion regions, where per capita income is lower than the EU average.

    High-quality, up-to-date photos of our headquarters for media use are available here.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Prioritisation of climate commitments – E-001899/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-001899/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    César Luena (S&D)

    With regard to the European Union’s climate commitments, the reform of the European Climate Law should include a 90 % emission reduction target for 2040, in line with the goal of achieving climate neutrality by 2050. What is more, the Commission will have to present the EU’s nationally determined contribution (NDC) under COP30 as part of global efforts to uphold the Paris Agreement.

    • 1.When does the Commission intend to submit its reform of the European Climate Law to include the goal of reducing emissions by 90 % by 2040 and the EU’s new NDC for COP30?
    • 2.How will the Commission’s recent proposal to review the priorities of the cohesion policy and the European Regional Development Fund, which limits the 30 % climate mainstreaming target, affect efforts to meet the 2040 climate goal?
    • 3.What guarantees can the Commission offer that the greater flexibility in the use of cohesion funds and the new prioritisation will not jeopardise the EU’s climate goals?

    Submitted: 13.5.2025

    Last updated: 19 May 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Saying Goodbye to Doug Beard, CASC Senior Administrator

    Source: US Geological Survey

    Doug has received numerous accolades for his leadership in the federal climate space, including the 2021 Climate Adaptation Leadership Award (Federal Government category) from the Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies, recognizing his “outstanding efforts to increase the resilience of America’s valuable living natural resources and help sustain the many people, communities, and businesses that depend on them.” He has also been awarded many USGS and DOI recognitions, most recently the Superior Service Award of the Department of the Interior for his leadership role in producing the USGS Climate Science Plan in 2023.  

    He has also become an important figure on the international stage, injecting USGS science into conversations on global stewardship and biodiversity. He has organized and led multi-national meetings, such as the 2024 World Fisheries Congress, chaired and co-chaired working groups with the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES), and been a frequent panelist and attendee of the annual Conference of the Parties (COP) meeting of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). 

    “Doug’s understated approach to navigating the complex landscape of science diplomacy is so incredibly effective,” says National CASC Research Fish Biologist Abby Lynch. “He has had an outsized influence on the development of major initiatives at national and international scales.” 

    There has never been a CASC network without Doug. As he moves on to his next phase, CASC staff reflect on how he has impacted their work and careers. 

    “Doug has been an inspiration among staff of all experience levels in our program, especially for his patience, political savvy, and charming mid-western demeanor,” says Shawn Carter, Chief Scientist of the National CASC. “His thoughtful and cool-headed leadership have garnered universal support for our program.” 

    “Doug has been an impactful mentor, role model, colleague, and friend. I am thankful for his guidance and support of my own career, and I hope that I can continue to apply what I’ve learned from him to support natural resources.” – Abby Lynch, Research Fish Biologist, National CASC 

    “Doug is an unassuming yet masterful strategist, building and positioning an innovative program that has made countless advancements in knowledge and application to challenging natural resource issues across the Nation,” says Molly Cross, Regional Administrator of the North Central CASC. 

    Fifteen years after that first unexpected meeting, Doug is still in a bit of disbelief how a “fish guy” like him become a foremost climate expert within the USGS and an international expert in global biodiversity issues. 

    “It’s been an honor to work for the American people,” he says. 

    Doug, we wish you all the best! 

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Global: Overshooting 1.5°C: even temporary warming above globally agreed temperature limit could have permanent consequences

    Source: The Conversation – UK – By Paul Dodds, Professor of Energy Systems, UCL

    Earth’s surface temperature has been 1.5°C hotter than the pre-industrial average for 21 of the last 22 months.

    The 2015 Paris agreement committed countries to keeping the global temperature increase “well below 2°C”, which is widely interpreted as an average of 1.5°C over a 30-year period. The Paris agreement has not yet failed, but recent high temperatures show how close the Earth is to crossing this critical threshold.

    Climate scientists have, using computer simulations, modelled pathways for halting climate change at internationally agreed limits. However, in recent years, many of the pathways that have been published involve exceeding 1.5°C for a few decades and removing enough greenhouse gas from the atmosphere to return Earth’s average temperature below the threshold again. Scientists call this “a temporary overshoot”.

    If human activities were to raise the global average temperature 1.6°C above the pre-industrial average, for example, then CO₂ removal, using methods ranging from habitat restoration to mechanically capturing CO₂ from the air, would be required to return warming to below 1.5°C by 2100.


    Get your news from actual experts, straight to your inbox. Sign up to our daily newsletter to receive all The Conversation UK’s latest coverage of news and research, from politics and business to the arts and sciences.


    Do we really understand the consequences of “temporarily” overshooting 1.5°C? And would it even be possible to lower temperatures again?

    Faith that a temporary overshoot will be safe and practicable has justified a deliberate strategy of delaying emission cuts in the short term, some scientists warn. The dangers posed by remaining above the 1.5°C limit for a period of time have received little attention by researchers like me, who study climate change.

    To learn more, the UK government commissioned me and a team of 36 other scientists to examine the possible impacts.

    How nature will be affected

    We examined a “delayed action” scenario, in which greenhouse gas emissions remain similar for the next 15 years due to continued fossil fuel burning but then fall rapidly over a period of 20 years.

    We projected that this would cause the rise in Earth’s temperature to peak at 1.9°C in 2060, before falling to 1.5°C in 2100 as greenhouse gases are removed from the atmosphere. We compared this scenario with a baseline scenario in which the global temperature does not exceed 1.5°C of warming this century.

    Our Earth system model suggested that Arctic temperatures would be up to 4°C higher in 2060 compared to the baseline scenario. Arctic Sea ice loss would be much higher. Even after the global average temperature was returned to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels, in 2100, the Arctic would remain around 1.5°C warmer compared to the baseline scenario. This suggests there are long-term and potentially irreversible consequences for the climate in overshooting 1.5°C.

    Temperature increases caused by overshooting 1.5°C are primarily felt in the Arctic and on land.
    Selena Zhang, Maria Russo, Luke Abraham and Alex Archibald.

    As global warming approaches 2°C, warm-water corals, Arctic permafrost, Barents Sea ice and mountain glaciers could reach tipping points at which substantial and irreversible changes occur. Some scientists have concluded that the west Antarctic ice sheet may have already started melting irreversibly.

    Our modelling showed that the risk of catastrophic wildfires is substantially higher during a temporary overshoot that culminates in 1.9°C of warming, particularly in regions already vulnerable to wildfires. Fires in California in early 2025 are an example of what is possible when the global temperature is higher.

    Our analysis showed that the risk of species going extinct at 2°C of warming is double that at 1.5°C. Insects are most at risk because they are less able to move between regions in response to the changing climate than larger mammals and birds.

    The impacts on society

    Only armed conflict is considered by experts to have a greater impact on society than extreme weather. Forecasting how extreme weather will be affected by climate change is challenging. Scientists expect more intense storms, floods and droughts, but not necessarily in places that already regularly suffer these extremes.

    In some places, moderate floods may reduce in size while larger, more extreme events occur more often and cause more damage. We are confident that the sea level would rise faster in a temporary overshoot scenario, and further increase the risk of flooding. We also expect more extreme floods and droughts, and for them to cause more damage to water and sanitation systems.

    Floods and droughts will affect food production too. We found that impact studies have probably underestimated the crop damage that increases in extreme weather and water scarcity in key production areas during a temporary overshoot would cause.

    We know that heatwaves become more frequent and intense as temperatures increase. More scarce food and water would increase the health risks of heat exposure beyond 1.5°C. It is particularly difficult to estimate the overall impact of overshooting this temperature limit when several impacts reinforce each other in this way.

    In fact, most alarming of all is how uncertain much of our knowledge is.

    For example, we have little confidence in estimates of how climate change will affect the economy. Some academics use models to predict how crops and other economic assets will be affected by climate change; others infer what will happen by projecting real-word economic losses to date into future warming scenarios. For 3°C of warming, estimates of the annual impact on GDP using models range from -5% to +3% each year, but up to -55% using the latter approach.

    We have not managed to reconcile the differences between these methods. The highest estimates account for changes in extreme weather due to climate change, which are particularly difficult to determine.

    We carried out an economic analysis using estimates of climate damage from both models and observed climate-related losses. We found that temporarily overshooting 1.5°C would reduce global GDP compared with not overshooting it, even if economic damages were lower than we expect. The economic consequences for the global economy could be profound.

    So, what can we say for certain? First, that temporarily overshooting 1.5°C would be more costly to society and to the natural world than not overshooting it. Second, our projections are relatively conservative. It is likely that impacts would be worse, and possibly much worse, than we estimate.

    Fundamentally, every increment of global temperature rise will worsen impacts on us and the rest of the natural world. We should aim to minimise global warming as much as possible, rather than focus on a particular target.


    Don’t have time to read about climate change as much as you’d like?

    Get a weekly roundup in your inbox instead. Every Wednesday, The Conversation’s environment editor writes Imagine, a short email that goes a little deeper into just one climate issue. Join the 45,000+ readers who’ve subscribed so far.


    Paul Dodds has received funding from the UK government through the Climate Services for a Net Zero World (CS-N0W) programme. While the UK government set the research questions for the study, it was carried out independently by scientists from nine organisations. Dodds has also received funding for other research projects from a range of organisations, including UK Research and Innovation organisations (Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council and the Natural Environment Research Council); the IEA Energy Technology Systems Analysis Program (ETSAP); and private organisations (National Grid; Fuels Industry UK; Johnson Matthey; Cadent). A team at UCL led by Paul Dodds jointly develops the UK TIMES energy system model in a partnership with the UK government. This model was not used in this study.

    ref. Overshooting 1.5°C: even temporary warming above globally agreed temperature limit could have permanent consequences – https://theconversation.com/overshooting-1-5-c-even-temporary-warming-above-globally-agreed-temperature-limit-could-have-permanent-consequences-255523

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI USA: SPC Tornado Watch 292 Status Reports

    Source: US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

    Search by city or zip code. Press enter or select the go button to submit request
    Local forecast by”City, St” or “ZIP” 

    SPC on Facebook

    @NWSSPC

    NCEP Quarterly Newsletter

    Home (Classic)SPC Products   All SPC Forecasts   Current Watches   Meso. Discussions   Conv. Outlooks   Tstm. Outlooks   Fire Wx Outlooks     RSS Feeds   E-Mail AlertsWeather Information   Storm Reports   Storm Reports Dev.   NWS Hazards Map   National RADAR   Product Archive   NOAA Weather RadioResearch   Non-op. Products   Forecast Tools   Svr. Tstm. Events   SPC Publications   SPC-NSSL HWTEducation & Outreach   About the SPC   SPC FAQ   About Tornadoes   About Derechos   Video Lecture Series   WCM Page   Enh. Fujita Page   Our History   Public ToursMisc.   StaffContact Us   SPC Feedback

    Watch 292 Status Reports

    Watch 292 Status Message has not been issued yet.

    Top/Watch Issuance Text for Watch 292/All Current Watches/Forecast Products/Home

    Weather Topics:Watches, Mesoscale Discussions, Outlooks, Fire Weather, All Products, Contact Us

    NOAA / National Weather ServiceNational Centers for Environmental PredictionStorm Prediction Center120 David L. Boren Blvd.Norman, OK 73072 U.S.A.spc.feedback@noaa.govPage last modified: May 19, 2025
    DisclaimerInformation QualityHelpGlossary
    Privacy PolicyFreedom of Information Act (FOIA)About UsCareer Opportunities

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Governor Stein Announces Second Hurricane Helene Budget Proposal

    Source: US State of North Carolina

    Headline: Governor Stein Announces Second Hurricane Helene Budget Proposal

    Governor Stein Announces Second Hurricane Helene Budget Proposal
    lsaito

    Raleigh, NC

    Today Governor Josh Stein visited Carolina Domes in Union Mills to propose additional funding for the Hurricane Helene recovery effort. Governor Stein recommends an additional $891 million to help western North Carolina rebuild.

    “Western North Carolina is coming back strong, but there is much more work to do,” said Governor Josh Stein. “I urge the General Assembly to pass a second round of funding so that the rebuilding and recovery efforts can continue as quickly and effectively as possible.”

    Governor Stein’s budget proposal includes: 

    • $260 million to spur economic recovery by supporting businesses and local governments and promoting western North Carolina’s tourism industry.
    • $239 million to strengthen critical infrastructure by repairing damaged schools, expanding debris clean-up, and investing in projects to safeguard against future disasters.
    • $113 million to advance housing recovery and provide assistance to families who have struggled with rent, mortgage, and utility bills.
    • $105 million to rehabilitate waterways and land used by farmers as well as fund wildfire prevention and response.
    • $23 million to address food insecurity in western North Carolina and the needs of affected community colleges.
    • $152 million for required state matching of federal disaster programs, investments in communication and disaster system improvements, and existing requirements that are not funded by state or federal dollars. 

    The Stein administration continues to be laser-focused on rebuilding western North Carolina. During Small Business Week, Governor Stein and North Carolina Secretary of Commerce Lee Lilley highlighted small businesses in Marshall that were impacted by Helene. He also announced that the Dogwood Health Trust, the Duke Endowment, and the State of North Carolina have distributed $55 million to more than 2,000 businesses in western North Carolina.

    The State of North Carolina also launched an additional $55 million state infrastructure program allowing local governments to apply for up to $1 million to rebuild public infrastructure that small business rely on, such as sidewalks and sewers. The Governor also joined the commencement ceremonies of Appalachian State University, Western Carolina University, and Asheville-Buncombe Technical Community College to honor the graduates’ resiliency in the wake of Hurricane Helene. 

    Read Governor Stein’s full Helene recovery budget proposal here. (Please note figures above are rounded to the nearest whole number.)  

    May 19, 2025

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Global: Governors are leading the fight against climate change and deforestation around the world, filling a void left by presidents

    Source: The Conversation – USA – By Mary Nichols, Distinguished Counsel for the Emmett Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, University of California, Los Angeles

    Forests like the Amazon play vital roles in balancing the environment, from storing carbon to releasing oxygen. Silvestre Garcia-IntuitivoFilms/Stone/Getty Images

    When the annual U.N. climate conference descends on the small Brazilian rainforest city of Belém in November 2025, it will be tempting to focus on the drama and disunity among major nations. Only 21 countries had even submitted their updated plans for managing climate change by the 2025 deadline required under the Paris Agreement. The U.S. is pulling out of the agreement altogether.

    Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, Chinese President Xi Jinping and the likely absence of – or potential stonewalling by – a U.S. delegation will take up much of the oxygen in the negotiating hall.

    You can tune them out.

    Trust me, I’ve been there. As chair of the California Air Resources Board for nearly 20 years, I attended the annual conferences from Bali in 2007 to Sharm el Sheikh, Egypt, in 2023. That included the exhilarating success in 2015, when nearly 200 nations committed to keep global warming in check by signing the Paris Agreement.

    In recent years, however, the real progress has been outside the rooms where the official U.N. negotiations are held, not inside. In these meetings, the leaders of states and provinces talk about what they are doing to reduce greenhouse gases and prepare for worsening climate disasters. Many bilateral and multilateral agreements have sprung up like mushrooms from these side conversations.

    This week, for example, the leaders of several state-level governments are meeting in Brazil to discuss ways to protect tropical rainforests that restore ecosystems while creating jobs and boosting local economies.

    What states and provinces are doing now

    The real action in 2025 will come from the leaders of states and provinces, places like Pastaza, Ecuador; Acre and Pará, Brazil; and East Kalimantan, Indonesia.

    While some national political leaders are backing off their climate commitments, these subnational governments know they have to live with increasing fires, floods and deadly heat waves. So, they’re stepping up and sharing advice for what works.

    State, province and local governments often have jurisdiction over energy generation, land-use planning, housing policies and waste management, all of which play a role in increasing or reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

    Their leaders have been finding ways to use that authority to reduce deforestation, increase the use of renewable energy and cap and cut greenhouse gas emissions that are pushing the planet toward dangerous tipping points. They have teamed up to link carbon markets and share knowledge in many areas.

    In the U.S., governors are working together in the U.S. Climate Alliance to fill the vacuum left by the Trump administration’s efforts to dismantle U.S. climate policies and programs. Despite intense pressure from fossil fuel industry lobbyists, the governors of 22 states and two territories are creating policies that take steps to reduce emissions from buildings, power generation and transportation. Together, they represent more than half the U.S. population and nearly 60% of its economy.

    Tactics for fighting deforestation

    In Ecuador, provinces like Morona Santiago, Pastaza, and Zamora Chinchipe are designing management and financing partnerships with Indigenous territories for protecting more than 4 million hectares of forests through a unique collaboration called the Plataforma Amazonica.

    Brazilian states, including Mato Grosso, have been using remote-sensing technologies to crack down on illegal land clearing, while states like Amapá and Amazonas are developing community-engaged bioeconomy plans – think increased jobs through sustainable local fisheries and producing super fruits like acaí. Acre, Pará and Tocantins have programs that allow communities to sell carbon credits for forest preservation to companies.

    Global Forest Watch uses satellite data to track forest cover change. Green shows areas with at least 30% forest cover in 2000. Pink is forest loss from 2003-2023. Blue is forest gain from 2000 to 2020.
    Global Forest Watch, CC BY

    States in Mexico, including Jalisco, Yucatán and Oaxaca, have developed sustainable supply chain certification programs to help reduce deforestation. Programs like these can increase the economic value in some of foods and beverages, from avocados to honey to agave for tequila.

    There are real signs of success: Deforestation has dropped significantly in Indonesia compared with previous decades, thanks in large part to provincially led sustainable forest management efforts. In East Kalimantan, officials have been pursuing policy reforms and working with plantation and forestry companies to reduce forests destruction to protect habitat for orangutans.

    It’s no wonder that philanthropic and business leaders from many sectors are turning to state and provincial policymakers, rather than national governments. These subnational governments have the ability to take timely and effective action.

    Working together to find solutions

    Backing many of these efforts to slow deforestation is the Governors’ Climate and Forests Task Force, which California’s then-Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger helped launch in 2008. It is the world’s only subnational governmental network dedicated to protecting forests, reducing emissions and making people’s lives better across the tropics.

    Today, the task force includes 43 states and provinces from 11 countries. They cover more than one-third of the world’s tropical forests. That includes all of Brazil’s Legal Amazon region, more than 85% of the Peruvian Amazon, 65% of Mexico’s tropical forests and over 60% of Indonesia’s forests.

    From a purely environmental perspective, subnational governments and governors must balance competing interests that do not always align with environmentalists’ ideals. Pará state, for example, is building an 8-mile (13 kilometer) road to ease traffic that cuts through rainforest. California’s investments in its Lithium Valley, where lithium used to make batteries is being extracted near the Salton Sea, may result in economic benefits within California and the U.S., while also generating potential environmental risks to air and water quality.

    Each governor has to balance the needs of farmers, ranchers and other industries with protecting the forests and other ecosystems, but those in the task force are finding pragmatic solutions.

    Pará State Gov. Helder Barbalho arrives for the Amazon Summit in August 2023. Eight South American countries agreed to launch an alliance to fight deforestation in the Amazon at the meeting.
    Evaristo SA / AFP via Getty Images

    The week of May 19-23, 2025, two dozen or more subnational leaders from Brazil, Mexico, Peru, Indonesia and elsewhere are gathering in Rio Branco, Brazil, for a conference on protecting tropical rainforests. They’ll also be ironing out some important details for developing what they call a “new forest economy” for protecting and restoring ecosystems while creating jobs and boosting economies.

    Protecting tropical forest habitat while also creating jobs and economic opportunities is not easy. In 2023, data show the planet was losing rainforest equivalent to 10 soccer fields a minute, and had lost more than 7% since 2000.

    But states and cities are taking big steps while many national governments can’t even agree on which direction to head. It’s time to pay attention more to the states.

    Mary Nichols is affiliated with the Emmett Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, which cosponsors the Governors’ Climate and Forests Task Force.

    ref. Governors are leading the fight against climate change and deforestation around the world, filling a void left by presidents – https://theconversation.com/governors-are-leading-the-fight-against-climate-change-and-deforestation-around-the-world-filling-a-void-left-by-presidents-256988

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI United Nations: Powering the Future with Forests: A Roadmap to a Circular Bioeconomy

    Source: United Nations Economic Commission for Europe

    Launch of the ECE/FAO Publication
    “Sustainable and Circular Bioeconomy in Forest-based Industries: How to Get There”

    📅 10 June 2025 | 🕒 15:00–16:00 CEST | 📍Online

    Background

    As the world shifts toward more sustainable, resource-efficient economic models, the forest sector stands out as a vital enabler of this transition. Forests provide a renewable source of raw materials that and forest-based industries can play a critical role in reducing dependence on fossil-based resources and promoting nature-based solutions across a wide range of industries—from construction and packaging to textiles and chemicals.

    The bioeconomy, when grounded in sustainable forest management and driven by circularity, offers an opportunity to decouple economic growth from environmental degradation while supporting rural development, innovation, and green job creation supporting societies to meet climate goals and shift toward more sustainable and resource-efficient economic models.

    ***

    Recognizing this opportunity, the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) and the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) have jointly worked on a publication: “Sustainable and Circular Bioeconomy in Forest-based Industries: How to Get There.” The publication explores pathways and actionable recommendations for advancing a sustainable, circular bioeconomy in the forest-based industries, while highlighting good practices, enabling conditions, and innovation trends across the forest-based value chains.

    Objective

    The event will serve to provide a platform for discussion among stakeholders on strategies for advancing circularity and sustainability in forest sectors. It will present key insights from the publication and showcase UNECE and FAO’s ongoing work on bioeconomy and forest-based industries.

    Target Audience

    The event is open to all stakeholders interested in forestry, sustainability, circular economy, and bioeconomy— including policymakers, industry representatives, researchers, NGOs, and international organizations.

     

     

    Tentative Programme (75 min total)

    Moderator:
    Dominique Burgeon, Director, Liaison Officer, FAO Liaison Office in Geneva

    Opening Remarks

    • Paola Deda, Director, Forests, Land and Housing Division, UNECE (5 minutes)
    • Zhimin Wu, Director, Forestry Division, FAO (5 minutes)

    UNECE and FAO Work on Bioeconomy

    • Florian Steierer, Economic Affairs Officer, Forests and Bioeconomy Section, UNECE (10 minutes)
    • Sven Walter, Chief, Forest Products and Bioeconomy Section, Forestry Division, FAO (10 minutes)
    • Lev Neretin, Senior Natural Resources Officer, Office for Climate Change, Biodiversity and Environment, FAO (10 minutes)

    Presentation of the Publication

    • Kathryn Fernholz, Dovetail Partners Lead author of the UNECE/FAO publication: “Sustainable and Circular Bioeconomy in Forest-based Industries: How to Get There.” (15 minutes)

    Q&A Session (15 minutes)

    Closing Remarks

    • Raschad Al-Khafaji, Director, FAO Liaison Office with the European Union and Belgium (5 minutes)

     

     

     

    MIL OSI United Nations News

  • MIL-OSI USA: The Changing Economics of Forestry in a Hotter, Wetter South

    Source: US Geological Survey

    Fire in the western U.S. poses one of the greatest threats to human and ecological communities alike. In fact, fire management is the largest single expenditure of land management funds on federal lands. Now, climate change is altering wildfire patterns. Climate change in the West is creating warmer and drier conditions, resulting in an increase in the amount of dead vegetation available to fuel f

    Learn More

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Westminster Council recognises Prince Charles Cinema as an Asset of Community Value | Westminster City Council

    Source: City of Westminster

    Westminster City Council has recognised the importance of the Prince Charles Cinema to the local area by making it an asset of community value.   

    The Prince Charles Cinema is one of the last independent cinemas operating in the West End and has been a staple in the area since opening in 1962.   

     A letter announcing the news from the council states how the cinema supports local filmmakers by providing platform for independent works and hosting film festivals.  

     It has also been a hosting venue for the BFI London Film Festival since 2016, and also participated in festivals from China, Czechia, the Philippines, Poland, Romania and Ukraine. including a partnership with the National Film & Television School.  

     The cinema is known for its eclectic programming, which includes cult classics, independent films, and international cinema and attracts over 250,000 visitors annually. In January 2025 alone, 155 films featured in its programme, a figure that far outstrips the choice offered by any other cinema in the country.  

     Cllr Geoff Barraclough, Westminster City Council Cabinet Member for Planning and Economic Development, said:       

    “The Prince Charles isn’t just a cinema—it’s a cultural landmark and a meeting place for film lovers of all kinds. Designating the Prince Charles as an asset of community value helps protect that spirit and keeps the reels turning for the next generation. We’re proud to back a venue that brings so much life, character, and cinematic adventure to the West End.” 

    Cllr Ryan Jude, Westminster City Council Cabinet Member for Climate, Ecology and Culture, said:  

     “This iconic cinema has long been a treasured part of our cultural landscape, championing independent voices, global stories, and community spirt. With its unique programming and support for local filmmakers, it plays a crucial role in nurturing creativity, diversity, and culture in the heart of Westminster.” 

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI USA: U.S. hydropower generation expected to rise by 7% in 2025 following last year’s record low

    Source: US Energy Information Administration

    In-brief analysis

    May 19, 2025


    We expect U.S. hydropower generation will increase by 7.5% in 2025 but will remain 2.4% below the 10-year average in our May Short-Term Energy Outlook (STEO). Hydropower generation in 2024 fell to 241 billion kilowatthours (BkWh), the lowest since at least 2010; in 2025, we expect generation will be 259.1 BkWh. This amount of generation would represent 6% of the electricity generation in the country.

    About half of the hydropower generating capacity in the country is in the western states of Washington, Oregon, and California, so we closely monitor precipitation patterns in this region to inform our hydropower outlook.

    Precipitation conditions have been mixed across the western United States since October. According to the WestWide Drought Tracker, more precipitation than normal has fallen in northern California, Oregon, and the eastern half of Washington state. Some areas in southeastern Oregon received record precipitation between October 2024 and April 2025. In contrast, precipitation was below normal in parts of Washington, Montana, Idaho, and Southern California.

    Accumulation from winter precipitation tends to peak by April 1. The snowpack accumulation at higher elevations serves as a natural reservoir that melts gradually as temperatures rise in the late spring and early summer, leading to increased waterflow through dams.

    Northwest and Rockies
    We expect hydropower generation in the Northwest and Rockies region to be 125.1 BkWh, which is a 17% increase compared with 2024 and 4% less than the 10-year average. Our hydropower forecast is informed by the water supply outlook from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Northwest River Forecast Center (NWRFC).

    On May 1, NWRFC released its latest April–September water supply forecast for the Pacific Northwest, part of the larger Northwest and Rockies region as modeled in the STEO. The NWRFC forecasts the region will have a below-normal water supply compared with the past 30 years in the northern portion of the basin, which includes the Upper Columbia River Basin, and above- to near-normal water supply in the southern portion, which includes the Snake River Basin. Water supply conditions at The Dalles Dam, located near the mouth of the Columbia River on the border between Washington and Oregon, reflect those of the upstream Columbia River system. The forecast at The Dalles Dam as of May 1 was 85% of normal for the same period.


    California
    We forecast hydropower generation in California to be 28.5 BkWh in our May STEO, which is 6% less than last year’s generation. This total would be 15% more than the 10-year average.

    As of April 1, reservoir levels in most major reservoirs in California were above the historical average for this time of year. The two largest reservoirs in the state, Shasta and Oroville, were at 113% and 121% of the historical average, respectively. According to the California Department of Water Resources, snowpack conditions as of April 1 were at 118% of normal for the Northern Sierra Nevada, 92% for Central Sierra, and 83% in Southern Sierra Nevada regions. Warmer-than-normal temperatures in April led to some early snowmelt across the state. As of the beginning of May, snowpack conditions were at 81% of normal for the Northern Sierra Nevada, 73% for Central Sierra, and 53% for the Southern Sierra portion.


    Principal contributor: Lindsay Aramayo

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Global: How aid cuts could make vulnerable communities even less resilient to climate change

    Source: The Conversation – UK – By Kalle Hirvonen, Senior Research Fellow, International Food Policy Research Insitute; Research Fellow, UNU-WIDER, United Nations University

    An irrigation project in Mozambique. Marcos Villalta / Save the Children, CC BY-NC-ND

    As global temperatures rise and climate-related disasters become more frequent, the need to adapt is rapidly increasing. That need for adaptation – from adjusting farming practices to diversifying livelihoods and strengthening infrastructure – is most acute in vulnerable low- and middle-income countries such as Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Haiti and Vietnam.

    Despite contributing a negligible share of historical global greenhouse gas emissions, these countries are facing the brunt of climate change. Yet as the demand for long-term resilience grows, international aid priorities are shifting in the opposite direction.

    Over the past three years, several major rich countries have substantially cut their development aid budgets. Remaining funds have been redirected towards emergency relief.

    This shift could undermine the climate finance commitments made by wealthy countries to mobilise US$300 billion (£228 billion) a year for climate action in the most vulnerable low- and middle-income countries by 2035.


    Get your news from actual experts, straight to your inbox. Sign up to our daily newsletter to receive all The Conversation UK’s latest coverage of news and research, from politics and business to the arts and sciences.


    Emergency aid, while vital for saving lives during crises such as droughts and floods, is reactive by nature. It arrives only after disaster has struck, often with a substantial delay.

    By contrast, climate adaptation is proactive. It focuses on anticipating future risks and helping communities prepare for changing environments.

    A key part of this is supporting transitions away from sectors like crop agriculture that are particularly vulnerable to climate-related shocks. In some cases, adapting to a changing climate may also require helping families move safely — turning relocation into a choice rather than a last resort.

    In Ethiopia, one of the world’s most drought-prone countries, a US government-funded food security programme aimed to strengthen resilience by offering livelihood training, organising savings groups and providing a US$200 lump sum to poor rural households. Research shows that this programme improved food security and protected assets during periods of drought.

    Livestock farming in the Somali region of Ethiopia which was severely affected by droughts in 2011.
    Malini Morzaria/EUECHO, CC BY-NC-ND

    In Nicaragua, families who received cash transfers alongside vocational training or investment grants were better protected against drought shocks than those relying on cash alone. These households could supplement farming with other income sources. This made them less vulnerable to drought-related losses and helped stabilise their earnings throughout the year.

    These schemes are known as “cash-plus programmes”. They help create the conditions for households to adapt and thrive. But when climate and environmental shocks overwhelm the resilience of local communities, relocation may still become the only viable option.

    That’s why proactive adaptation efforts need to be scaled up and broadened — not only to meet immediate needs but to support longer-term transitions. This includes investing in sustainable livelihoods through diversified income sources, skills training and, when necessary, enabling safe and voluntary relocation.

    Some pilot interventions that supported seasonal rural-to-urban migration have shown what’s possible. In Bangladesh, a small migration subsidy of just US$8.50 helped the participating poor farm households affected by seasonal famine cover travel costs.

    Migration for temporary work increased by 22%, and families back home experienced improvements in food security. With even modest support, people were able to access job opportunities in cities and strengthen their resilience.

    Programmes that make it easier for people to choose to move from rural areas to cities could help families move with dignity rather than in desperation. However, scaling up such initiatives successfully remains a challenge, requiring strong political commitment and effective governance.

    Climate relocation

    Without proactive planning and support, migration often happens out of necessity rather than choice. This kind of displacement typically occurs within national borders rather than across continents — contrary to popular narratives.

    In fact, 59% of the world’s forcibly displaced population live within their own country. By the end of 2023, a record 75.9 million people across 116 countries were internally displaced — a 51% increase over the previous five years, driven in part by climate change.

    A family leave their home in Oklahoma, US, as a result of the 1930s dust bowl disaster.
    Dorothea Lange/Library of Congress, Farm Security Administration/Office of War Information.

    History provides sobering lessons about relocation triggered by environmental collapse. In the 1930s, a severe drought and dust storms struck the Great Plains in the US, creating the “dust bowl”. This devastated farmland and forced millions of people to leave their homes, as economic hardship became widespread and the land so degraded that crops wouldn’t grow.

    Today, similar patterns loom as droughts, floods and rising seas threaten livelihoods around the world. Small island states such as Tuvalu face existential threats from rising sea levels, with entire communities at risk of being displaced.

    These mounting threats underscore a hard truth: the window for effective climate adaptation is rapidly closing. As climate disruptions intensify, the case for long-term investment in resilience has never been clearer. Without proactive adaptation, the cycle of crisis and response will only deepen.

    Societies can adapt, but doing so takes foresight, investment and courage. In the face of escalating climate risks, bold, forward-looking policies are not a luxury — they are a necessity. By supporting longer-term strategies, rich-country governments and aid charities can enable vulnerable communities to withstand, adapt and, when necessary, move with dignity.


    Don’t have time to read about climate change as much as you’d like?

    Get a weekly roundup in your inbox instead. Every Wednesday, The Conversation’s environment editor writes Imagine, a short email that goes a little deeper into just one climate issue. Join the 45,000+ readers who’ve subscribed so far.


    Kalle Hirvonen’s recent and ongoing research has been funded by the CGIAR Trust Fund (https://www.cgiar.org/funders/), the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland.

    Olli-Pekka Kuusela does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. How aid cuts could make vulnerable communities even less resilient to climate change – https://theconversation.com/how-aid-cuts-could-make-vulnerable-communities-even-less-resilient-to-climate-change-255358

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Study trip to Finland for representatives of the Ministry of Ecology, Environmental Protection and Climate Change of Uzbekistan

    Source: Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe – OSCE

    Headline: Study trip to Finland for representatives of the Ministry of Ecology, Environmental Protection and Climate Change of Uzbekistan

    Study trip to Finland for representatives of the Ministry of Ecology, Environmental Protection and Climate Change of Uzbekistan | OSCE
    Skip navigation

    Navigation

    Navigation

    Home Newsroom News and press releases Study trip to Finland for representatives of the Ministry of Ecology, Environmental Protection and Climate Change of Uzbekistan

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Ethiopia Unveils Strategic Initiative to Green Its Financial System and Drive Sustainable Investment

    Source: European Investment Bank

    EIB

    • EIB Greening Financial Systems Programme to work with the National Bank of Ethiopia and Commercial banks to enhance technical understanding of climate risks, enhance climate finance and develop Ethiopian green taxonomy 
    • Ethiopia latest country to join pioneering climate resilience initiative backed by Germany

    The Greening Financial Systems Programme was officially launched in Ethiopia today by Ethiopian and international partners at the Ethiopia Finance Forum.

    This transformative initiative aims to strengthen the resilience of Ethiopia’s financial sector to climate change by embedding climate risk into regulatory frameworks, advancing climate-related disclosures, and supporting the financing of sustainable projects across the country.

    The National Bank of Ethiopia: Driving the green finance agenda

    At the heart of this initiative is the National Bank of Ethiopia (NBE), which is spearheading efforts to integrate climate considerations into the core of the financial sector. Recognizing the growing risks climate change poses to financial stability, the NBE is undertaking a strategic reform to align Ethiopia’s financial system with national climate objectives and international sustainability standards.

    Demonstrating its strong institutional commitment, the NBE has established a high-level internal oversight and coordination team to guide the implementation, monitor progress, and ensure effective follow-up of the GFS Programme. This team brings together senior experts from across the Bank to oversee integration of climate risk considerations into supervisory frameworks and to coordinate with stakeholders on the development of green finance tools.

    The GFS Programme will support the NBE in:

    • Integrating climate-related financial risks into its supervisory and regulatory frameworks.
    • Enhancing climate risk management capabilities across the financial sector.
    • Developing a climate risk disclosure and reporting framework aligned with international best practices.
    • Strengthening institutional capacity through tailored training programs and technical support.
    • Coordinating the development of a National Green Taxonomy that will guide financial institutions and investors on what constitutes environmentally sustainable economic activities.

    “The financial sector has a critical role to play in mobilising the significant finance required for Ethiopia’s transition to a climate-resilient, green economy. The Greening Financial Systems initiative will enhance our capacity to guide the sector in adapting to a changing climate and unlocking green investment opportunities,” said H.E. Mamo E. Mihretu, Governor of the National Bank of Ethiopia.

    The technical assistance agreements were signed during the forum by Mr. Solomon Desta, Vice Governor for Financial Institutions at the National Bank of Ethiopia, and Ms. Leyla Traoré, Head of the EIB Representation to Ethiopia and the African Union. The event was attended by the German Ambassador to Ethiopia and the African Union, the EU Ambassador to Ethiopia, and representatives from the Ministry of Finance of Ethiopia.

    The EIB is delighted to welcome Ethiopia to the Greening Financial Systems Programme. By supporting the National Bank of Ethiopia, we are building an enabling environment that will unlock vital climate action and green investments, contributing to Ethiopia’s ambitious climate goals,” said Ambroise Fayolle, Vice President of the European Investment Bank.

    Funded by Germany through the International Climate Initiative (IKI), and implemented by the EIB, the GFS Programme in Ethiopia forms part of a broader international initiative that also includes Albania, Armenia, Georgia, Kenya, Nigeria, North Macedonia, and Rwanda.

    Strengthening financial institutions for climate resilience

    Beyond regulatory enhancements, the programme also supports Ethiopian commercial banks and financial institutions to build green finance capabilities. This includes:

    • Developing green lending portfolios.
    • Improving internal climate risk assessments.
    • Introducing climate-sensitive credit evaluation frameworks.
    • Facilitating access to green finance instruments and capacity-building workshops.

    By complementing the regulatory improvements led by the NBE, this support aims to mobilize private finance for environmentally sustainable investments, helping banks identify viable green projects and reduce exposure to climate-related risks.

    Laying the foundation for a national green taxonomy

    A key priority under the NBE’s leadership is the development of Ethiopia’s first National Green Taxonomy, a classification system that will define which economic activities and investments are considered sustainable and climate aligned. The taxonomy will:

    • Provide clarity and consistency in green investment classification.
    • Serve as a reference for financial institutions, regulators, and investors.
    • Support the alignment of domestic practices with international ESG and sustainability standards.

    This process will be accompanied by consultations with stakeholders and the preparation of reporting guidelines for the taxonomy’s application across the financial sector.

    Ethiopia is among the countries most vulnerable to climate change, with growing risks from extreme weather, drought, and food insecurity. These risks pose serious threats to the economy and the stability of the financial system.

    The National Bank of Ethiopia’s proactive leadership and institutional commitment—in collaboration with the EIB and international partners—underscores a bold national effort to build climate resilience. Through the GFS Programme, Ethiopia is positioning its financial system to not only manage risks but also seize green investment opportunities that contribute to long-term, sustainable economic growth.

    “Germany is proud to support Ethiopia’s efforts to green its financial system through the International Climate Initiative. The IKI Fund is one of the key instruments of the German Federal Government for international climate action to support strategies for countries that seek to achieve the green transformation. Strengthening financial resilience and unlocking green investment is crucial for Ethiopia’s sustainable future.” said H.E. Jens Hanefeld, German Ambassador to Ethiopia.

    This programme underscores the close partnership between the European Union and Ethiopia in addressing the urgent challenge of climate change. By strengthening the financial sector’s capacity to manage climate risks and finance green projects, we are jointly advancing sustainable development and building resilience,” added H.E. Mrs. Sofie From-Emmesberger, EU Ambassador to Ethiopia.

    Background information

    About EIB Global

    The European Investment Bank (ElB) is the long-term lending institution of the European Union, owned by its Member States. It finances investments that contribute to EU policy objectives.

    EIB Global is the EIB Group’s specialised arm devoted to increasing the impact of international partnerships and development finance, and a key partner of Global Gateway. We aim to support €100 billion of investment by the end of 2027 — around one-third of the overall target of this EU initiative. Within Team Europe, EIB Global fosters strong, focused partnerships alongside fellow development finance institutions and civil society. EIB Global brings the EIB Group closer to people, companies and institutions through our offices across the world. High-quality, up-to-date photos of our headquarters for media use are available here.

    http://twitter.com/EIB

    https://www.linkedin.com/company/eib-global/

    More information about the Greening Financial Systems (GFS) technical assistance programme is here.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Global: Climate scientists are trusted globally, just not as much as other scientists – here’s why

    Source: The Conversation – Global Perspectives – By Omid Ghasemi, Research Associate in Behavioural Science at the Institute for Climate Risk & Response, UNSW Sydney

    I. Noyan Yilmaz, Shutterstock

    Societies increasingly rely on scientists to guide decisions in times of uncertainty, from pandemic outbreaks to the rise of artificial intelligence.

    Addressing climate change is no different. For governments wanting to introduce ambitious climate policies, public trust in climate scientists is pivotal, because it can determine whether voters support or resist those efforts.

    So do people trust climate scientists, and what affects levels of trust? Our new study shows climate scientists are less trusted than other types of scientists globally. But there are profound variations in this trust gap between countries, and within them.

    Finding ways to increase trust in climate scientists is crucial if the world is to implement effective policies to avert dangerous global warming.

    Low trust in climate scientists may hinder effective climate science communication and reduce public engagement with climate solutions.
    Mozgova, Shutterstock.

    Examining trust in science

    We collaborated with an international team of researchers to analyse data from one of the largest cross-national surveys of public attitudes toward science. The dataset includes responses from nearly 70,000 people across 68 countries. It offers a rare global snapshot of how people perceive scientists in general, and climate scientists in particular.

    Each of these people rated their trust in climate scientists on a five-point scale, with a five indicating very high trust and a one being not trusted at all.

    Trust in scientists more generally was assessed using a 12-item questionnaire that measured perceptions of expertise, integrity, benevolence and openness. The responses were averaged to create a composite trust score. Higher scores reflected higher levels of trust.

    We found trust in scientists was moderately strong worldwide, as it was above the midpoint of the scale (averaging 3.6 out of 5). But trust in climate scientists was slightly lower (averaging 3.5). The difference between the two scores is what we call the “trust gap”.

    In 43 of the 68 countries, the trust gap was statistically significant, with people reporting lower trust in climate scientists than in scientists in general.

    The size of the trust gap varied between countries. In Europe, Oceania (including Australia and New Zealand) and North America the gap tended to be smaller. Larger gaps emerged in parts of Latin America and Africa.

    The Democratic Republic of the Congo had the widest gap, with climate scientists trusted less than in any other country. This may reflect local concerns that global climate agendas — often supported by international scientists — prioritise resource extraction for foreign renewable energy demands over local interests. Such feelings may be particularly acute in regions where mining has brought limited community benefit.

    Six countries bucked the trend. Climate scientists were more trusted than scientists overall in China, Taiwan, South Korea, Egypt, Israel and Germany.

    In China and Germany, this may reflect strong investment in green energy, high levels of public support for climate action, and the visible role climate scientists play in shaping policy.

    What’s going on here?

    Not surprisingly, people with more positive views of science tended to express higher trust in scientists and even more so, climate scientists. But people with dim views of scientists were less trusting of climate scientists.

    Age also played a role. Older people tended to trust scientists more than younger people. But younger people were more likely to trust climate scientists.

    Climate scientists were generally less trusted than scientists regardless of gender. While men reported slightly lower trust in scientists than women did, the difference was not statistically significant.

    Among all the variables we examined, political orientation emerged as one of the strongest factors associated with trust in climate scientists. People with right-leaning or conservative views reported lower trust in climate scientists compared with those with more left-leaning or liberal views.

    However, the meaning of terms such as “liberal” and “conservative” can vary considerably between countries. For example, in Australia, the Liberal Party is politically right-leaning. But in the United States, “liberal” typically refers to left-leaning or progressive views. This variation makes cross-national comparisons complex and requires careful interpretation of results.

    As a particular person’s political orientation shifted further to the right, the trust gap between climate scientists and scientists widened.

    In 28 countries across the Americas, Europe and Oceania, right-leaning orientation was associated not only with lower trust in climate scientists than people who leaned to the left, but also with a larger gap between trust for scientists generally and trust for climate scientists.

    In a smaller subset of countries, particularly in parts of Asia, Africa and Eastern Europe, the pattern reversed – right-leaning individuals expressed greater trust in climate scientists than their left-leaning counterparts.

    These findings suggest it is not political orientation alone that drives public trust, but how climate issues are framed in political discourse. In many Western countries, public messaging around climate change — particularly from conservative parties and media — has cast doubt on the credibility of climate science. This politicisation, often amplified by vested interests such as fossil fuel lobbies, may help explain the erosion of trust among some conservative groups.

    Closing the trust gap

    Trust alone will not solve the climate crisis, but it plays a crucial role in shaping how societies respond to scientific guidance.

    Ambitious, evidence-based policies require public support to succeed. A persistent trust gap — no matter how small — can undermine that support and help explain why many governments continue to fall short of their climate targets.

    Closing the trust gap through transparent communication, inclusive public engagement, and consistent political leadership is essential for turning awareness into action.

    Omid Ghasemi receives funding from the Australian Academy of Science.

    Ben Newell receives funding from The Australian Research Council.

    ref. Climate scientists are trusted globally, just not as much as other scientists – here’s why – https://theconversation.com/climate-scientists-are-trusted-globally-just-not-as-much-as-other-scientists-heres-why-256441

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-Evening Report: Climate scientists are trusted globally, just not as much as other scientists – here’s why

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Omid Ghasemi, Research Associate in Behavioural Science at the Institute for Climate Risk & Response, UNSW Sydney

    I. Noyan Yilmaz, Shutterstock

    Societies increasingly rely on scientists to guide decisions in times of uncertainty, from pandemic outbreaks to the rise of artificial intelligence.

    Addressing climate change is no different. For governments wanting to introduce ambitious climate policies, public trust in climate scientists is pivotal, because it can determine whether voters support or resist those efforts.

    So do people trust climate scientists, and what affects levels of trust? Our new study shows climate scientists are less trusted than other types of scientists globally. But there are profound variations in this trust gap between countries, and within them.

    Finding ways to increase trust in climate scientists is crucial if the world is to implement effective policies to avert dangerous global warming.

    Low trust in climate scientists may hinder effective climate science communication and reduce public engagement with climate solutions.
    Mozgova, Shutterstock.

    Examining trust in science

    We collaborated with an international team of researchers to analyse data from one of the largest cross-national surveys of public attitudes toward science. The dataset includes responses from nearly 70,000 people across 68 countries. It offers a rare global snapshot of how people perceive scientists in general, and climate scientists in particular.

    Each of these people rated their trust in climate scientists on a five-point scale, with a five indicating very high trust and a one being not trusted at all.

    Trust in scientists more generally was assessed using a 12-item questionnaire that measured perceptions of expertise, integrity, benevolence and openness. The responses were averaged to create a composite trust score. Higher scores reflected higher levels of trust.

    We found trust in scientists was moderately strong worldwide, as it was above the midpoint of the scale (averaging 3.6 out of 5). But trust in climate scientists was slightly lower (averaging 3.5). The difference between the two scores is what we call the “trust gap”.

    In 43 of the 68 countries, the trust gap was statistically significant, with people reporting lower trust in climate scientists than in scientists in general.

    The size of the trust gap varied between countries. In Europe, Oceania (including Australia and New Zealand) and North America the gap tended to be smaller. Larger gaps emerged in parts of Latin America and Africa.

    The Democratic Republic of the Congo had the widest gap, with climate scientists trusted less than in any other country. This may reflect local concerns that global climate agendas — often supported by international scientists — prioritise resource extraction for foreign renewable energy demands over local interests. Such feelings may be particularly acute in regions where mining has brought limited community benefit.

    Six countries bucked the trend. Climate scientists were more trusted than scientists overall in China, Taiwan, South Korea, Egypt, Israel and Germany.

    In China and Germany, this may reflect strong investment in green energy, high levels of public support for climate action, and the visible role climate scientists play in shaping policy.

    What’s going on here?

    Not surprisingly, people with more positive views of science tended to express higher trust in scientists and even more so, climate scientists. But people with dim views of scientists were less trusting of climate scientists.

    Age also played a role. Older people tended to trust scientists more than younger people. But younger people were more likely to trust climate scientists.

    Climate scientists were generally less trusted than scientists regardless of gender. While men reported slightly lower trust in scientists than women did, the difference was not statistically significant.

    Among all the variables we examined, political orientation emerged as one of the strongest factors associated with trust in climate scientists. People with right-leaning or conservative views reported lower trust in climate scientists compared with those with more left-leaning or liberal views.

    However, the meaning of terms such as “liberal” and “conservative” can vary considerably between countries. For example, in Australia, the Liberal Party is politically right-leaning. But in the United States, “liberal” typically refers to left-leaning or progressive views. This variation makes cross-national comparisons complex and requires careful interpretation of results.

    As a particular person’s political orientation shifted further to the right, the trust gap between climate scientists and scientists widened.

    In 28 countries across the Americas, Europe and Oceania, right-leaning orientation was associated not only with lower trust in climate scientists than people who leaned to the left, but also with a larger gap between trust for scientists generally and trust for climate scientists.

    In a smaller subset of countries, particularly in parts of Asia, Africa and Eastern Europe, the pattern reversed – right-leaning individuals expressed greater trust in climate scientists than their left-leaning counterparts.

    These findings suggest it is not political orientation alone that drives public trust, but how climate issues are framed in political discourse. In many Western countries, public messaging around climate change — particularly from conservative parties and media — has cast doubt on the credibility of climate science. This politicisation, often amplified by vested interests such as fossil fuel lobbies, may help explain the erosion of trust among some conservative groups.

    Closing the trust gap

    Trust alone will not solve the climate crisis, but it plays a crucial role in shaping how societies respond to scientific guidance.

    Ambitious, evidence-based policies require public support to succeed. A persistent trust gap — no matter how small — can undermine that support and help explain why many governments continue to fall short of their climate targets.

    Closing the trust gap through transparent communication, inclusive public engagement, and consistent political leadership is essential for turning awareness into action.

    Omid Ghasemi receives funding from the Australian Academy of Science.

    Ben Newell receives funding from The Australian Research Council.

    ref. Climate scientists are trusted globally, just not as much as other scientists – here’s why – https://theconversation.com/climate-scientists-are-trusted-globally-just-not-as-much-as-other-scientists-heres-why-256441

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Commander UKStratCom Commendations 2025

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    News story

    Commander UKStratCom Commendations 2025

    On Friday 16 May, personnel and teams from across Strategic Command came together to receive their Commander’s Commendation from General Sir Jim Hockenhull. ​​​​​​​

    MOD Copyright

    This four-star award was given in recognition of outstanding work in support of Strategic Command and wider-MOD.  

    General Sir Jim Hockenhull was pleased to welcome Strategic Command personnel from areas such as Defence Support, Permanent Joint Headquarters and Integrated Global Defence Network (IGDN). 

    MOD Copyright

    Commander Strategic Command Commendations 

    • British Army Lieutenant Colonel R Weston 

    • Royal Navy Lieutenant Commander S Williams 

    • British Army Major S Johnson 

    • British Army Major M Wyldes  

    • Royal Air Force Squadron Leader L Bryden 

    • British Army Captain W Smith 

    • British Army Staff Sergeant P Spencer 

    • British Army Sergeant R Toner 

    • British Army Corporal T Harker 

    • Civil Service J Blackwood 

    • Civil Service M Darlow 

    • Civil Service J Froom 

    • Civil Service P Reid 

    • Civilian P Sadler 

    Team Awards 

    • Defence Digital Strategic Networks, Computers and Communications (Strat NCC) Team 

    • Defence Academy Climate Change and Sustainability Lead Team 

    • Defence Support Chain Operations and Movements (DSCOM) Compassionate Cell – Joint Support

    Updates to this page

    Published 19 May 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI: Zappify Reviews: Don’t Waste Your Money On Zappify 2.0 Till You’ve Read This!

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    NEWARK, N.J., May 19, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Each year, mosquito-borne diseases kill more than 700,000 people worldwide, making the tiny-looking insect the deadliest animal on Earth. Malaria alone accounts for nearly 600,000 of those deaths, with an estimated 597,000 malaria-related fatalities in 2023 despite intensified control efforts. Dengue fever is not far behind, infecting over 390 million people annually and causing approximately 21,000 deaths each year.

    Beyond these two, mosquitoes also transmit Zika, chikungunya, yellow fever, and other pathogens, placing over half of the world’s population at risk of at least one mosquito-borne disease. In 2024 alone, more than 7.6 million dengue cases have already been reported, highlighting how critical effective protection is in both urban and rural settings. Even as global malaria cases hit 249 million in 2022, resulting in 608,000 deaths, the need for transformative, chemical-free solutions has never been clearer.

    Introducing Zappify: an innovative, compact bug zapper crafted to protect your home and outdoor spaces without emitting DEET or other harmful chemicals. Harnessing a tri-band UV LED system skillfully tuned to the peak attraction wavelengths of Aedes and Anopheles species, Zappify lures mosquitoes into a high-voltage grid, instantly neutralizing them.

    Many Zappify reviews say its lightweight cylinder build delivers 360° coverage, generating a mosquito-free zone of up to 30 m² in under minutes, while the whisper-quiet operation and up to 13 hours of battery life mean you can enjoy pest-free evenings without disturbance. Constructed in collaboration with entomologists and materials scientists, Zappify blends groundbreaking insect behavior science with rugged, intuitive engineering to provide visible results.

    Are you ready to reclaim your space from these deadly pests? Read on to understand how Zappify’s sophisticated technology works, why it’s become a crucial tool for families and professionals, and how you can purchase your device today to eradicate it from your space…

    What Is Zappify?

    Zappify is a groundbreaking, portable anti-mosquito lamp engineered to turn any space, indoors or out, bug-free without the use of toxic chemicals. Zappify is a 100% safe and rechargeable bug zapper that allows you to enjoy your interior and outdoors bug and mosquito free in the USA and Canada.

    Zappify is equipped with advanced technology that uses three different wavelengths of light to attract, trap, and eliminate mosquitoes and bugs to death with unparalleled efficiency. Zappify 2.0 comes with numerous innovative features and unbeatable advantages that make it the best mosquito zapper out there.

    Created from the real-life frustration of Nathan Clarke, Zappify provides a humane,silent solution to bites and buzzing. Its sophisticated, cylindrical form factor permits 360° bug attraction, whether positioned on a table or dangling from a window. Zappify’s chemical-free function guarantees it’s harmless for kids, animals, and anyone with sensitivities to traditional insect deterrents.

    Many consumer reports categorically state that Zappify is a must-have in your outdoor gear because of its 3-in-1 design, which functions as a bug zapper, flashlight, and an all-weather camping light. All Zappify customer’ review claim that it is portable and lightweight, making it simple to carry with you wherever you go. The Zappify is constructed with top-quality components for exceptional durability and functionality.

    The functionality of Zappify 2.0 is ensured throughout all four seasons because they are designed with enduring quality in mind, are weather-resistant, strong and sturdy. Beneath its sleek exterior, Zappify 2.0 delivers remarkable performance: a three-band UV lamp that releases three unique wavelengths shown to draw up to three times more flying insects, funneling them into a 2,000-volt electrified grid that offers instant zaps.

    Zappify promises to be a long-lasting addition to both your indoors and outdoor spaces, offering reliability and performance for years to come. Runners, campers, and backyard chefs alike appreciate the Zappify rechargeable battery’s commendable 13-hour runtime, which is twice the capacity of the original model. Zappify also has an intuitive digital readout that keeps the user informed when it’s time to recharge.

    Developed for casual users and outdoor professionals, many user reviews emphatically agree that Zappify offers professional-grade bug control in a compact, IPX5-waterproof package. A handy carabiner makes repositioning or relocation of the Zappify very easy, while its USB-C charging port ensures steady protection for the device. Zappify provides a scientifically grounded, chemical-free defense that keeps families, travelers, and event planners one step ahead of bites and buzzing.

    Many American and Canadian customers find Zappify effective, working well both inside and outside, and catching hundreds of bugs. The Zappify 2.0 receives positive feedback for its appearance, with every customer noting its attractive purple LED design, and customers consider it worth the price. Zappify is valued as the best and easy to use portable bug zapper that you can use anywhere conveniently.

    CLICK HERE TO BUY YOUR ZAPPIFY FROM THE OFFICIAL WEBSITE AT MASSIVE DISCOUNT TODAY

    What Are The Unique Characteristics of Zappify (Zappify Reviews)

    • 30 m² 360° Coverage Zone: Zappify’s refined cylindrical design projects its electrified grid in a full 360° arc, creating an insect‐free perimeter up to 30 square meters—three times the range of its first model. Internally, the device holds optimally spaced stainless‐steel electrodes that support uniform voltage across the entire surface. This guarantees that any mosquito entering the marked zone is attracted and neutralized, whether the unit sits on a tabletop corner or in the center of your balcony.
    • 13-Hour Rechargeable Battery Pack: Fundamentally, Zappify contains a high‐capacity lithium‐ion battery that lasts for 13 hours of continuous operation. The battery cells are installed in a rugged, IPX5‐rated housing to withstand outdoor moisture, while an improved charging circuit regulates current for safe, effective recharges via USB-C. This extended autonomy lets you utilize the unit overnight or throughout day long outdoor activities.
    • 2,000-Volt Electric Elimination Grid: Zappify’s advanced zapper grid provided a high‐voltage pulse of 2,000 volts, over three times the power of the earlier generation, through its corrosion‐resistant electrodes. The grid’s mesh spacing is accurately calibrated to admit even the smallest mosquitoes while eliminating accidental contact by fingers or pets. When an insect enters the space, the intense discharge instantly terminates it, converting electrical energy into a quick, clean arc.
    • Portable and Compact: Zappify is lightweight and compact, making it easy to take with you wherever you go. It easily fits in your bag, as you head out this summer. You can use it at the park, patio, ball game, or wherever you want for maximum mosquito relief. It’s perfect for any activities you don’t want mosquitoes to ruin!
    • Three-Band UV Light Attraction System: Replacing the single‐wavelength bulb of its predecessor, Zappify uses a tri‐band UV lamp that emits three distinct ultraviolet frequencies proven to attract a broader spectrum of mosquito species. Each band is tuned to specific insect photoreceptors, optimizing attraction efficacy by up to 300%. Enclosed within a secured quartz sleeve, the UV modules are rated for long-term stability, ensuring consistent output over hundreds of work hours.
    • Integrated 12-LED Ultra-Bright Lantern: Beyond its bug‐zapping capabilities, Zappify has an array of 12 high-intensity LEDs around its base, serving as a multi-purpose lantern. Each LED is selected for enhanced luminosity and energy efficiency, delivering ambient illumination for campsites, balconies, or interior spaces. The LEDs are calibrated with the unit’s power management system to draw minimal current, ensuring the lighting feature can run concurrently impacting overall battery life.
    • Precision Battery Life Indicator: To keep users informed, Zappify features a digital battery‐life indicator panel installed in it. Three LED segments display the remaining charge in real time, and a single button press provides an instant status update. The indicator circuit blends with the device’s charge controller to adapt to any temperature and load, providing a precise estimate of remaining operational time, removing any guesswork, and ensuring you know accurately when to recharge.
    • Weatherproof: Zappify has an IPX5 waterproof rating that makes it compatible with outdoor use. The anti-bug lamp is designed to withstand weather conditions, including rain, intense heat, wind, and extreme weather. As a result, it can function appropriately in outdoor environments without being damaged. Moreover, it’s durable and practical as it can work in damp conditions. In addition, it’s convenient as it doesn’t require additional protection or maintenance.
    • Noiseless Operation: Zappify’s noteworthy and defining feature is its ability to operate quietly. In contrast to other portable gadgets of its sort, the Zappify runs silently, which is great because it means you won’t have to put up with excessive noise.
    • Chemicals-free: The Zappify sets itself apart from traditional insecticides and mosquito zappers, which include a number of chemicals or other substances that are exceedingly dangerous to human health. Zappify 2.0 kills insects without the use of harmful chemicals. It is a third-generation device that attracts and zaps insects or pests using UV light energy.
    • Handy Hanging Loop: Zappify comes with a handy hanging loop that makes it easy to hang anywhere you need it. You can hang it in your backyard, on your patio, or even in your tent. It is an ideal camping or outdoor accessory for any summer adventure.

    Does Zappify Really Work? (Zappify Reviews)

    Zappify works on a straightforward yet highly effective principle by employing a potent blend of UV light and a 2,000-volt electrified grid to draw in and eliminate mosquitoes and bugs within a 30 square meters range. Unlike chemical sprays or sticky traps, Zappify 2.0 doesn’t emit toxins or odors, instead relying on UV wavelengths that insects instinctively can’t resist.

    The official Zappify website revealed that the cylindrical build ensures a full 360° attraction field, while the sturdy electric discharge prompt zaps any bug that makes contact. In lab-style tests and controlled demonstrations, this synergy of attraction and high-voltage power consistently kills mosquitoes massively in minutes, creating a “dead zone” of mosquito-free space indoors or outdoors.

    Beyond the technical power, real-world users completely confirm Zappify’s performance. Every review unequivocally agrees that Zappify 2.0 works perfectly well. The Zappify’s combination of chemical-free operation, extended 13-hour battery life, and sturdy safety grills makes it one of the most dependable and intuitive mosquito killers on the market.

    Finally, Zappify has been very much well-received by customers, with 5-star ratings from overwhelming positive reviews praising its exceptional efficacy and performance, Zappify has quickly gained a reputation as a must-have tool for mosquito and bug control in the United States and Canada. Backed by a 30-day money-back guarantee and a 1-year warranty, it’s a low-risk remedy that changes evenings from itchy frustration into peaceful, bite-free enjoyment.

    Why Should You Buy Zappify?

    Zappify isn’t just another bug zapper, it’s a versatile, chemical-free defense system crafted to secure your home and protect you and your loved ones from disease-carrying mosquitoes. Its plush, cylindrical design releases distinct UV wavelengths that lure mosquitoes and funnel them into a 2,000-volt electrified grid that zaps pests promptly and humanely.

    Zappify covers up to 30 m², using its powerful UV light and extra 12-LED camping light to lure insects from all sides, while also providing soft, ambient illumination for evening use. Fueled by a single USB-C top-off that powers you for up to 13 hours, it is clear digital meter helps you schedule recharges in advance, so you can regulate multi-day adventures without worrying about running low.

    Beyond maximum performance, Zappify offers unmatched versatility and security. It’s IPX5 waterproofed for reliable outdoor use, compact and lightweight for easy transport, and comes with a handy carabiner handle so you can hang it wherever mosquitoes gather.

    Zappify is 100% safe around children and pets, making it the best choice for families, campers, and professionals alike. As new, deadly mosquito species expand their range and global mosquito-borne diseases rise, Zappify stands out as a scientifically proven, user-friendly solution that works discreetly in the background, equipping you to enjoy your evenings.

    Many reviewers confirm that Zappify distinguishes itself from other mosquito control solutions by offering comprehensive features and benefits in the United States Of America. Zappify ticks all the boxes and as such it is reliable, legit, rechargable, weatherproof and very user-friendly. Many customers categorically agree that Zappify 2.0 is the most advanced yet user friendly bug zapper available on the market today.

    What Are The Beautiful Benefits That Come With Using Zappify (Zappify Reviews)

    • 100% Chemical-Free Family Protection: Zappify works without emitting DEET or any toxic repellents, guaranteeing your safety and ensuring that every zap is purely electrical. This chemical-free method makes it safe for the children’s rooms or next to your outdoor dinner spot without worrying about skin irritation or inhalation hazards.

    According to environmentalist J. Duffy, “I trust Zappify 2.0 to keep my family bite-free. It’s cost-friendly, easy to use, and KILLS A TON of mosquitoes.” His experience underlines how Zappify provides potent mosquito control without exposing loved ones to toxic substances, changing any space into a safe, toxin-free zone for play, sleep, and family gatherings.

    • Expansive 30 m² Coverage for Complete Peace: With its sturdy predecessor, Zappify generates a mosquito “dead zone” spanning up to 30 square meters. You no longer need many devices to safeguard your backyard or large living room; one unit delivers the required results.

    Backyard enthusiast Daniel Klein raved, “Zapped ALL of the bugs in my backyard! … Being able to sit outside at night was just awesome.” His backyard-wide mosquito eradication indicates that Zappify doesn’t solely minimize nuisance; it eliminates buzzing intruders across wide areas, giving you undisturbed evening barbecues, hangouts, or living-room relaxation.

    • Long-lasting, Portable Power for All-Day Protection: Providing up to 13 hours of continuous operation from sunset into the night or across a full day of campsite fun. It’s rechargeable via USB-C, and the installed battery indicator enables easy monitoring of the power levels.

    As reviewer Marcus confirms, “Holds a charge through the night while I sleep soundly! Not a bite on me in the morning.” Whether you’re camping, hosting an outdoor party, or simply seeking undisrupted rest, Zappify’s endurance guarantees you remain bite-free around the clock.

    • Ultra-Effective 3-Band UV Attraction for Maximum Capture: Zappify’s proprietary three-wavelength UV lamp is synchronized to insect vision, luring in mosquitoes more powerfully than single-band lights. This innovation transforms your device into a magnet for every stray mosquito in the vicinity—no more blind spots.

    Paul Connors attests, “I placed it next to my bed … the device easily attracted a ton of mosquitoes and other insects.” His success story indicates that Zappify doesn’t lean on guesswork; its scientifically tuned light spectrum ensures every mosquito within range is exterminated.

    • Quiet, Discreet Operation for Restful Nights: Unlike conventional zappers that crackle loudly, Zappify keeps a low “buzz-zap” whisper that doesn’t interrupt your sleep or conversation. The sound is so discreet that once mosquitoes vanish, you barely notice the device.

    Peter Bridges notes, “This mosquito killer works … I saw a bug flying in my room and the zapper lured it into the bag and zapped it.” His comment suggested how Zappify’s silent performance interacts with your environment, providing mosquito extermination without the soundtrack of electrical arcs.

    • Great for Indoor and Outdoor Use: Zappify’s versatile design makes it suitable for both indoor and outdoor use. Whether you’re enjoying a quiet evening indoors or spending time in the backyard, Zappify adapts to various environments, offering consistent mosquito protection.
    • Environmentally Friendly: By eliminating the need for toxic chemicals and offering a USB-rechargeable battery, Zappify contributes to environmental sustainability. Users can enjoy effective mosquito control without compromising on eco-friendliness.
    • Durable Construction for Long-Term Use: Crafted from high-quality and durable materials, Zappify is designed for long-term use. Its robust construction ensures that the device maintains its effectiveness over time, providing reliable mosquito control for an extended period.
    • Versatile for Different Occasions: Zappify enhances outdoor enjoyment by creating a mosquito-free environment. Whether you’re hosting a barbecue, camping under the stars, or simply relaxing in the backyard, Zappify ensures that mosquitoes don’t disrupt your outdoor activities, allowing you to make the most of your time spent outdoors.

    CLICK HERE TO BUY YOUR ZAPPIFY FROM THE OFFICIAL WEBSITE AT MASSIVE DISCOUNT TODAY

    Why Is Zappify Better Than Other Products in the Market?

    Most mosquito zappers on the market rely on a single UV wavelength and a modest electric grid, leaving large swaths of your outdoor or indoor space open to mosquito infestation. Zappify breaks these limitations with a three-band UV light. This process creates a mosquito-free zone covering up to 30 m², three times the range of many competitors.

    Moreso, its cylindrical, 360° design lures insects from all angles rather than just one direction. Coupled with a rechargeable battery that lasts up to 13 hours, far beyond most rival units, this level of performance ensures consistent, dependable protection through the night without plugging into an outlet.

    Zappify is impressively user-friendly and suitable for people from all backgrounds. It’s designed to be easy to use right out of the box making it an environmentally friendly way to eliminate mosquitoes and other flying insects. Zappify reviews have a consumer reports average rating of 9.10/10.0 for how well it eliminates bugs and mosquitoes, its affordability, and how swift it is to purchase in the USA and Canada.

    All reviewers revealed that this upgraded Zappify stands out among others as the safest and most reliable option due to its unique combination of features that prioritize both effectiveness and safety. Unlike many competing products, Zappify boasts a 100% non-toxic design, making it completely safe for use around children and pets. This distinguishes it as a family-friendly solution for mosquito control, providing peace of mind to users concerned about the potential risks associated with chemical-based alternatives.

    Finally, its installed LED camping lantern and an IPX5 waterproof rating guarantee good illumination and protection for your campsite in any weather. With a handy carabiner for safe positioning, USB-C recharging for universal compatibility, and easy-clean mesh screens, Zappify emerges as a professional-grade mosquito control system engineered for casual users and seasoned outdoor enthusiasts.

    How Do You Use Zappify? (Zappify Reviews)

    Deploying your Zappify is as simple as charging, positioning, and powering on—here’s how to turn on your 360° mosquito shield in just a few steps:

    • Charge & Check: Plug the USB-C cable into Zappify’s port and charge until the digital battery-life indicator reads full (up to 13 hours of runtime).
    • Choose & Place: Decide whether you need indoor or outdoor protection, then either hang the cylinder by its carabiner or set it on a flat surface at the center of your seating area—each unit covers a 30 m² “dead zone.”
    • Activate the Lights: Press the power button to ignite the three-band UV lamps and 12 ultra-bright LEDs. The multi-wavelength spectrum will begin drawing in mosquitoes from every angle.
    • Zap: As insects approach, they’ll fly into the electrified 2,000-volt grid and be exterminated.
    • Monitor & Maintain: Watch the battery readout; when it runs low, recharge for your next outing. After use, simply brush out the collection tray for easy cleanup.

    Is Zappify Really Worth My Money? (Zappify Reviews)

    When you weigh Zappify’s upfront cost against potential expenses and risks of using conventional mosquito control chemical sprays, replacement coils, or bite-soothing treatments the value proposition becomes clear. A single charge and you are protected for up to 13 hours across a 30 m² radius. By eliminating the need for DEET-based lotions or indoor foggers, Zappify keeps your family from toxic exposure.

    Beyond pure economics, Zappify provides premium functionality that justifies every penny spent. Zappify is an upgraded and advanced bug zapper making it one of the best, if not the absolute best, bug zapper out there on the market and here is why we say so. Zappify comes with three times as many wavelengths to capture bugs, 12 LED Ultra-Bright Camping Light that attracts more bugs and lights your surroundings, three times the killing range and extended battery life.

    In fact all reviewers categorically agree that Zappify is superior to all other conventional bug zappers out there on the market for its powerful rechargeable battery features, multi-function design, more bug killing power, and futuristic zapper design. When viewed in the context of its effectiveness, versatility, and durability, the Zappify comes off as a worthwhile investment for anyone seeking a permanent solution to their bug-related woes.

    CLICK HERE TO BUY YOUR ZAPPIFY FROM THE OFFICIAL WEBSITE AT MASSIVE DISCOUNT TODAY

    Pros – Zappify Reviews

    • Zappify is compact and portable
    • Provides you with powerful mosquito killing power
    • Multipurpose functionality as a mosquito zapper and a lantern
    • Long-lasting USB rechargeable battery
    • Comes with a handy hanging loop that makes it even more convenient to use
    • Features 3 brightness features
    • It is water resistant
    • Zappify 2.0 does not contain any harmful chemicals or substance
    • Zappify 2.0 has a lightweight and hangable design
    • It is very easy to use
    • High efficiency
    • Comes with a special introductory 50% OFF discount if you order now from the main site!
    • Quick delivery
    • 30-day money-back guarantee
    • Zappify is a futuristic zapper that works to clear your area of mosquitoes fast.
    • Zappify is designed to deliver an effective 360° anti-mosquito shield that will rid you of annoying, biting insects once and for all.

    Cons (Zappify Reviews)

    • Zappify 2.0 is not available for purchase on local stores and third party eCommerce sites like Amazon, eBay, Walmart, and the likes of them.
    • Zappify 2.0 can only be purchased online from the product’s official website alone
    • Shipping fees may apply
    • Zappify has the tendency to sell out fast again

    Is Zappify a Scam or Legit?

    Zappify is a genuine, FDA-compliant mosquito zapper produced by Sapience Group LLC, a New Jersey-based company with a clear corporate address and powerful DMCA protection. With over 231,421 verified ratings and social-proof testimonials from real users including farmers, campers, and suburban families, Zappify has shown a consistent ability to exterminate mosquitoes across diverse environments.

    Based on honest Zappify customer reviews, Zappify is 100% legit and reliable for ultimate performance. As per consumer reports, the Zappify has 4.95 -star impressive ratings given by the customers of Canada & USA which also mean it is one of the most reliable and dependable mosquito zapper available in the market.

    That said, legitimacy hinges on buying through the official Zappify website to ensure you receive the authentic, chemical-free unit with full warranty protection. Ultimately, Zappify is a legitimate solution for mosquito and bug control, provided you order from authorized channels, take advantage of the money-back guarantee, and follow the simple setup instructions for optimal effectiveness.

    How Much Does Zappify Cost?

    Zappify is currently selling at incredibly affordable prices, with flexible bundle options tailored for every need and budget:

    • Buy one Zappify 2.0 for $39.99
    • 2x Zappify 2.0 – $39.99 each (50% off)
    • 3x Zappify 2.0 – $29.99 each (62% off)
    • 4x Zappify 2.0 – $29.99 each (62% off)

    These discounted bundles are ideal for home use, travel, or as intentional gifts. With up to 62% savings, it’s a smart and affordable investment in a fly-free, comfortable living space. Seize this limited-time pricing opportunity before it sells out!

    Zappify Where To Buy? (Zappify Reviews)

    Zappify is widely available through trusted online platforms, making it easy and convenient to purchase from the comfort of your home. However, the best place to buy Zappify is directly from the official website, where you can take advantage of exclusive deals, bundle discounts, and special promotions that may not be available elsewhere.

    CLICK HERE TO BUY YOUR ZAPPIFY FROM THE OFFICIAL WEBSITE AT MASSIVE DISCOUNT TODAY

    Zappify Consumer Reports And Customers Complaints Reviewed

    Claude T.
    “I used Zappify in my tent when I was camping, and it worked perfectly. The mosquitoes were flying directly to the light and they got zapped. Easy to charge and the perfect size to carry around.”

    Randy R.
    “Easy to use, easy to clean, and it kills mosquitoes fast! It’s just about the best camping accessory you’ll find. Perfect for the outdoors.”

    Luka T.
    “Just recently bought this Zappify zapper after reading all the reviews. I definitely recommend it to future buyers that this little gizmo really works. I saw a bug flying in my room which I can’t catch and I turned on the Zappify 2.0 & it worked to lure the bug and zap it.”

    Greg H.
    “Zappify 2.0 works as described!! Placed it next to my bed over for a few nights, and the device miraculously attracted a decent amount of mosquitoes and even other insects. It also comes with a small handy brush which makes cleaning up very easy and fuss-free.”

    Frequently Asked Questions About Zappify 2.0 Reviewed

    How does Zappify 2.0 work?

    Zappify employs a three-band UV light to attract mosquitoes and flying insects from up to 30 m² away. Once lured in, they contact a 2,000-volt electrified grid that instantly zaps them—no chemicals, sprays, or traps needed.

    Does Zappify require a wall outlet for power?

    Absolutely not. Zappify 2.0 operates on a rechargeable battery and comes with a USB connection for charging. You do not need to have it plugged in to use it, which is the idea behind the battery being rechargeable.

    Can I use Zappify around my kids and pets?

    Absolutely, Zappify is safe to use around kids and pets! This Zappify mosquito repellant does not contain DEET or any harmful chemicals. So it is absolutely safe for kids and pets. For your health and that of your loved ones, cease using harmful chemicals on your home in the name of eliminating mosquitoes. Opt for this 100% safe to use modern zapper, that kills mosquitoes dead without any toxic substance.

    What are some tips to maximize the effectiveness of my Zappify?

    Well, according to the providers of the Zappify , to maximize the effectiveness, you must position your Zappify 2.0 in your desired location and let it run for at least two hours before using the place. This is to totally clear the area of mosquitoes prior to your presence there. In addition to that, ensure you minimize ambient light around the device so that the Zappify 2.0’s LED lights can effectively attract mosquitoes without having to compete with other light sources that may decrease its effectiveness.

    Is Zappify easy to use?

    Zappify is completely user-friendly! You do not need to be tech-savvy to use Zappify. Simply remove your Zappify 2.0 from its packaging and charge it with the included USB cord, and that is all. You can place the Zappify 2.0 upright or hang it. Then turn it on and watch as it zaps all the mosquitoes in your territory.

    Can I use Zappify indoor?

    Absolutely! Zappify is safe for both indoor and outdoor use. It is safe to use in various rooms and settings including bedrooms, living rooms, kitchens, and outdoor spaces like camping grounds and gardens.

    How do I clean my Zappify?

    Cleaning Zappify is very simple and easy. Ensure that your Zappify is unplugged, then remove the removable tray or grid, dispose of the zapped mosquitoes and insects, and clean the tray with a soft brush or cloth. Your Zappify package comes with a user manual for specific cleaning guidelines.

    Does Zappify make a lot of noise?

    No, not at all. Zappify does not cause any racket. It is designed to operate quietly. The electric grid produces a minimal sound when insects are zapped, ensuring a peaceful environment for both indoor and outdoor use.

    Final Remarks On Zappify Reviews

    Zappify represents a breakthrough in mosquito control, it integrates refined UV-attraction technology with a high-voltage electric grid, completely chemical-free. Its 360° cylindrical engineering and three-band UV lamps work in harmony to draw in and exterminate insects across a generous 30 m² radius, so you can enjoy your indoor and outdoor spaces without having to depend on toxic sprays or messy traps.

    Moreover, Zappify 2.0 promotes convenience and safety. Experience up to 13 hours of uninterrupted use from a single USB-C charge ideal for twilight get-togethers or overnight adventures and is placed with its intuitive power-status display so you’re always in supervision. The IPX5 water-resistant casing and enclosed zapper grid mean you can hang it outdoors or near children and pets without health hazards. Cleaning is seamless, thanks to a removable collection tray and included brush.

    In all, Zappify is an indispensable breakthrough in mosquito eradication systems. Whether you’re hosting a backyard barbecue, settling into a bedroom for the night, or pitching a tent on your next camping trip, Zappify provides an instant “dead zone” against disease-carrying pests. With its 30-day money-back guarantee, there’s no risk: if it doesn’t live up to its claims, you’ll get your money back stress-free.

    CLICK HERE TO BUY YOUR ZAPPIFY FROM THE OFFICIAL WEBSITE AT MASSIVE DISCOUNT TODAY

    Media Contact:
    Name: Emily Carson
    Company: Zappify
    Address: 78 John Miller Way, Kearny, New Jersey 07032
    Email: emily@myzappify.com
    Phone: +1 (888) 452-9983
    Website: https://www.myzappify.com

    Legal Disclaimer: This media platform provides the content of this article on an “as-is” basis, without any warranties or representations of any kind, express or implied. We assume no responsibility for any inaccuracies, errors, or omissions. We do not assume any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information presented herein. Any concerns, complaints, or copyright issues related to this article should be directed to the content provider mentioned above.

    Photos accompanying this announcement are available at
    https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/dd18cbb3-1e7a-4fae-8eaa-d653a8eed80d

    https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/eb0473c6-53d4-463f-afbb-5ab504eadd71

    https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/0c3f6326-6982-4480-a10a-cfaef25b23e2

    https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/af0be3d5-ae60-46e9-98ba-1e63f5ce80f6

    https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/fb19d00b-369c-4a36-9e48-0e15891f873c

    https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/63f7976e-0b2c-47f6-98e7-0c204ac81d03

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI Russia: China puts emergency response into effect over possible floods

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: People’s Republic of China in Russian – People’s Republic of China in Russian –

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    BEIJING, May 19 (Xinhua) — China’s National Flood and Drought Control Headquarters issued a level-4 emergency response late Sunday over possible flooding in east China’s Fujian Province and south China’s Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region. A task force has also been dispatched to Guangxi to provide on-site assistance, according to the Ministry of Emergency Management.

    Heavy rains and downpours are expected in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Guangdong, Fujian and Zhejiang provinces from May 18 to 19, according to meteorological service forecasts.

    The authorities of the relevant regions are advised to closely monitor the development of the situation, intensify interdepartmental consultations and interaction, and, if necessary, take decisive measures to evacuate people to ensure their safety.

    China has a four-tier flood emergency response system, with level one being the highest. -0-

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-Evening Report: ER Report: A Roundup of Significant Articles on EveningReport.nz for May 19, 2025

    ER Report: Here is a summary of significant articles published on EveningReport.nz on May 19, 2025.

    What does it mean to ‘accept’ or ‘reject’ all cookies, and which should I choose?
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Ahmed Ibrahim, Senior Lecturer, Computing and Security, Edith Cowan University Shutterstock/The Conversation It’s nearly impossible to use the internet without being asked about cookies. A typical pop-up will offer to either “accept all” or “reject all”. Sometimes, there may be a third option, or a link to

    What causes ADHD? What we know, don’t know and suspect
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Alison Poulton, Senior Lecturer, Brain Mind Centre Nepean, University of Sydney Sergey Novikov/Shutterstock Neurodevelopmental disorders are a diverse group of conditions that affect the brain from early development. They include attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), autism and learning disabilities, such as dyslexia. These conditions usually become more evident

    Pacific children as young as 6 adopted, made to work as house slaves
    By Gill Bonnett, RNZ immigration reporter This story discusses graphic details of slavery, sexual abuse and violence Pacific children as young as six are being adopted overseas and being made to work as house slaves, suffering threats, beatings and rape. Kris Teikamata — a social worker at a community agency — spoke about the harrowing

    Australia launches ‘landmark’ UN police peacekeeping course for Pacific region
    Australia has launched the world’s first UN Police Peacekeeping Training course tailored specifically for the Pacific region. The five-week programme, hosted by the Australian Federal Police (AFP), is underway at the state-of-the-art Pacific Policing Development and Coordination Hub in Pinkenba, Brisbane. AFP said “a landmark step” was developed in partnership with the United Nations, and

    AI is moving fast. Climate policy provides valuable lessons for how to keep it in check
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Milica Stilinovic, PhD Candidate, School of Media and Communications; Managing Editor, Policy & Internet journal, University of Sydney cybermagician/Shutterstock Artificial intelligence (AI) might not have been created to enable new forms of sexual violence such as deepfake pornography. But that has been an unfortunate byproduct of the

    1 in 5 Gazans face starvation. Can the law force Israel to act?
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Donald Rothwell, Professor of International Law, Australian National University As Israel continues to pound Gaza with airstrikes, killing scores of people a day, the two-month ceasefire that brought a halt to the violence earlier this year feels like a distant memory. Israel’s overall military and political objective

    More people are trying medicinal cannabis for chronic pain. But does it work?
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Suzanne Nielsen, Professor and Deputy Director, Monash Addiction Research Centre, Monash University PeopleImages.com – Yuri A/Shutterstock More Australians than ever are being prescribed medicinal cannabis. Medicinal cannabis refers to legally prescribed cannabis products. These are either the plant itself, or naturally occurring ingredients extracted from the plant.

    Why is southern Australia in drought – and when will it end?
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Chiara Holgate, Senior Research Fellow, ARC Centre of Excellence for Weather of the 21st Century, Australian National University Artic_photo/Shutterstock Swathes of South Australia, Victoria, Tasmania and Western Australia are in the grip of drought as they experience some of the lowest rainfall totals on record. Farmers are

    Wine is still Australia’s most popular alcoholic drink – but many producers face an uncertain future
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Paul Chad, Honorary Fellow, Faculty of Business and Law, School of Business, University of Wollongong kwest/Shutterstock Australia has become world-famous for its wine, but the industry faces an uncertain future. Too many grapes grown amid falling consumer demand, an oversupply of budget wine, and an undersupply of

    Something borrowed, something blue? Why the reign of the traditional wedding dress may be over
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Jye Marshall, Lecturer, Fashion Design, School of Design and Architecture, Swinburne University of Technology Wedding Rebellion Workshop, London Ellie Cooper/unsplash The family and friends are all gathered, wedding bells are ringing, and the bride walks down the aisle in her beautiful bubblegum pink wedding dress. Twenty years

    NZ Budget 2025: economic forecasting is notoriously difficult, but global uncertainty is making it harder
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michael Ryan, Lecturer in Economics, University of Waikato Javier Ghersi/Getty Images This year’s budget will be one of the tightest in a decade, with the New Zealand government halving its operating allowance – the new money it has available to spend – from NZ$2.4 billion to $1.3

    Why the wall of silence on the Gaza genocide is finally starting to crack
    Report by Dr David Robie – Café Pacific. – As Israel unveils its final genocide push, and mass death from starvation looms in Gaza, Western media and politicians are tentatively starting to speak up ANALYSIS: By Jonathan Cook Who could have imagined 19 months ago that it would take more than a year and a

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Auckland flood project wins prestigious award

    Source: Secondary teachers question rationale for changes to relationship education guidelines

    A project that’s transforming how Auckland deals with flooding has just taken home one of the top awards in the country.

    At the recent Stormwater Conference and Expo Gala, the Ports of Auckland Outfall project was named Project of the Year, a big win for the team behind it.

    The project, a collaboration between Auckland Council’s Healthy Waters, McConnell Dowell, and GHD, tackled a serious problem: regular flooding in Auckland’s Eastern CBD and Stanley Street area. This flooding threatened key infrastructure assets like Britomart Station, Spark Arena, and the Ports of Auckland.

    To solve it, the team pulled off a New Zealand first.

    They used a unique underground tunnelling technique, combined with what’s called an “inverted siphon”, to build a new stormwater outfall.

    This system runs deep below Quay Street and through the Ports area, using twin pipes that now carry stormwater safely into the Waitematā Harbour.

    Working under active train lines, historic sea walls, and a live port environment was no easy feat. But with close cooperation from KiwiRail, Auckland Transport, Ngāti Whātua Ōrākei, and local businesses, the team made it happen without major disruption.

    Looking down into the inverted siphon machine on Quay Street.

    “I want to congratulate everyone in the team on this well-deserved award,” says Craig McIlroy, General Manager Healthy Waters & Flood Resilience.

    “As we have seen through various extreme rain events, the climate change impact of flooding to the Auckland region has caused unprecedented disruption.

    “The dedication and mahi that went into the project shows the strength of their collaborative approach in preparing for the future.”

    One of the keys to their success was a special tunnelling machine that safely dug a 300-meter tunnel with minimal surface impact. Safety was front and centre throughout the process, and smart planning helped keep costs in check while speeding up construction.

    Inverted siphon tunneling machine at work below Quay Street.

    This isn’t just a win for the project team, it’s a big step forward for Auckland. The new outfall significantly reduces the risk of flooding downtown, making the city more resilient as extreme weather becomes more common. It also sets the stage for future growth, capping off nearly 20 years of careful planning.

    In short, this award-winning project shows how smart ideas and strong teamwork can solve even the toughest urban challenges.

    The Healthy Waters team came away with a further two awards on the night; Sarah Nolan won the Young Stormwater Professional of the Year and Rachel Devine as co-author of the winning Stormwater Paper of the Year for her work on the Auckland Central Library green roof.

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: AMENDMENTS 001-003 – REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanism – A10-0085/2025(001-003)

    Source: European Parliament

    AMENDMENTS 001-003
    REPORT
    on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanism
    (COM(2025)0087 – C10-0035/2025 – 2025/0039(COD))
    Committee on the Environment, Climate and Food Safety
    Rapporteur: Antonio Decaro

    Source : © European Union, 2025 – EP

    MIL OSI Europe News