Blog

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Northwood Declaration: 10 July 2025 (UK-France joint nuclear statement)

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Press release

    Northwood Declaration: 10 July 2025 (UK-France joint nuclear statement)

    Statement by the United Kingdom and the French Republic on Nuclear Policy and Cooperation – July 2025.

    The President of the French Republic and the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom reaffirm their longstanding and resolute commitment to nuclear cooperation. There is no greater demonstration of the strength and importance of our bilateral relationship than our willingness to work together in this most sensitive area. In this regard, we commend the important achievements since 2010.

    Our nuclear weapons exist to deter the most extreme threats to the security of our nations and our vital interests.Our nuclear forces are independent, but can be coordinated and contribute significantly to the overall security of the Alliance, and to the peace and stability of the Euro Atlantic area.

    As we have explicitly stated since 1995, we do not see situations arising in which the vital interests of either France or the United Kingdom could be threatened without the vital interest of the other also being threatened. France and the United Kingdom agree that there is no extreme threat to Europe that would not prompt a response by our two nations. 

    France and the United Kingdom have therefore decided to deepen their nuclear cooperation and coordination. A UK-France Nuclear Steering Group will be established to provide political direction for this work. It will be led by the Presidency of the French Republic and the Cabinet Office and will coordinate across nuclear policy, capabilities and operations. 

    The United Kingdom and France reaffirm their full support for the Treaty on the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons and for our obligations under the treaty. We will coordinate ever more closely to uphold and reinforce the international non-proliferation architecture.

    Updates to this page

    Published 10 July 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Lancaster House 2.0: Declaration on Modernising UK-French Defence and Security Cooperation

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Press release

    Lancaster House 2.0: Declaration on Modernising UK-French Defence and Security Cooperation

    Declaration on Modernising UK-French Defence and Security Cooperation.

    The UK and France, as Europe’s only nuclear powers and leading militaries, share a unique responsibility for European and international defence and security. Our two nations represent nearly 40% of the defence budget of European Allies, and more than 50% of European spending on research and technology.

    Since the Chequers Declaration in 1995, successive generations of leaders have recognised the intertwined nature of our vital interests, affirming that a threat to one would represent a threat against the other. In 2010, through the Lancaster House Treaties, our nations formalised this shared cooperation to address the challenges of that era: expeditionary warfare and counterterrorism.

    Fifteen years later, the threats we face have changed fundamentally with state-on-state conflict rising globally and, since Russia’s illegal invasion of Ukraine, the return of full-scale war to Europe. We have a shared responsibility to strengthen Euro-Atlantic security and recall, in this regard, the critical deterrence that NATO provides. We reaffirm the importance of intensifying our efforts in support of NATO and acting jointly within it.  We also recognise the value of a stronger and more capable European defence that contributes positively to transatlantic and global security and is complementary to, and interoperable with, NATO. In this regard, we underline that the European Union remains a unique and essential partner for NATO. We also welcome the progress we have made on the UK-EU Security Defence Partnership in bringing together our shared interests in protecting the continent.

    The UK and France share the same understanding of the threats we face. The return of conventional warfighting at scale in Europe and beyond, strategic competition on the global stage, combined with hostile state activity, rapid expansion in hybrid warfare and disinformation, create a febrile and dangerous international order. States are increasingly using hybrid tactics against us, either directly or using proxies, to undermine our national security and our democracies. 

    The UK and France are willing and able to act together, decisively, to protect our shared interests, allies, partners in Europe and beyond, values and, fundamentally, our democratic way of life. We must be ready and willing to oppose our adversaries across the full spectrum of national security, requiring a new, whole of society and government approach. We are resolved to deepen and expand our partnership to jointly deter and respond to the heightened challenge these evolving threats pose including cyber, sabotage, espionage, malign use of artificial intelligence and foreign information manipulation and interference. This can only be achieved by the further integration of our Military, National Security, Diplomatic, Intelligence and Economic levers.

    It is in this context that we, as Prime Minister of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and President of the French Republic, have decided to reboot, modernise and build upon our bilateral defence and security relationship, including under the Lancaster House Treaties, in order to effect a generational shift in both our bilateral cooperation and our joint contribution to the defence of Europe, its citizens and of its interests. Today, we have declared our intent to carry out a series of ambitious projects and new areas of collaboration that will underpin our defence and security relationship for the next fifteen years and beyond.

    1. Deepening our longstanding and resolute commitment to cooperation between our independent nuclear deterrents by:

    a. Setting out our contribution to the defence of European partners and NATO Allies, and stating that whilst our nuclear forces are independent, they can be coordinated, as set out in the Northwood Declaration;

    b. Enhancing mutual understanding of respective nuclear deterrence policies, doctrine and plans, and strengthening our ability to make coordinated decisions in peace time and in crisis;

    c. Expanding cooperation on nuclear research (as initiated since 2010) including by making greater use of the facilities in each other’s countries;

    d. Coordinating more closely to uphold and reinforce the international non-proliferation architecture; and

    e. Establishing a UK-France Nuclear Steering Group to provide political direction for this cooperation, led by the Presidency of the French Republic and the Cabinet Office to coordinate across policy, capability and operations.

    2. Launch the Combined Joint Force – overhauling the existing Combined Joint Expeditionary Force to refocus it on the Euro-Atlantic and warfighting at scale to deter, placing it on an operational footing for the first time by endeavouring to:

    a. Significantly increase the declared Combined Joint Force (CJF) capacity, up to fivefold, ensuring the ability to plan and command Combined Corps Capability (the highest level of fielded forces in our armies). This Corp can provide the Land component of a broader joint force combining all military functions, as part of NATO or bilaterally. The CJF will facilitate the deployment of a force fully interoperable with NATO and available as the Alliance’s Strategic Reserve; this is a critical step towards the UK and France providing two fully interoperable Strategic Reserve Corps to NATO, enabled by the CJF.

    b. Adopt new missions, enabling the CJF to conduct activity in the Euro-Atlantic to deter our adversaries and reassure our Allies and partners, while also being prepared to compete with our adversaries further afield if needed.

    c. Establish a mechanism to share, coordinate and synchronise military activity and the deployment of UK and French forces globally, ensuring we are providing the most effective deterrence posture.

    d. Establish a dedicated cell to operationalise the CJF, overseeing military strategic coordination and planning through to operational coordination.

    e. Maintain the ability for the CJF to integrate additional allies and partners under UK-French leadership and to ensure the CJF is complementary to NATO.

    f. Use the CJF structures to underpin the Coalition of the Willing for Ukraine. The force will provide the joint planning framework to cohere the Coalition, ensure joint operational and strategic messaging. It will provide Coalition leadership and command and control for the planning and operational deployment of the Coalition covering all five domains, preparing for the operational deployment of the CJF in the event of a ceasefire – which can be supported by allies.

    3. Embark upon an ‘Entente Industrielle’ to enhance capability and industrial co-operation, bringing our defence industries and militaries closer than ever before to strengthen NATO, by endeavouring to:

    a. Launch the development phase of the Future Cruise and Anti-Ship Weapon (FC/ASW) programme to provide the next generation of long-range, highly survivable Deep Strike Missiles.

    b. Jointly develop the next generation of beyond-visual-range air-to-air missiles for our fighter jets, while also extending the Meteor capability, launching a joint study with industry to inform our future development of its successor.

    c. Acquire new SCALP & Storm Shadow missiles, following their successful use by Ukraine, upgrading UK and French production lines to bolster national stockpiles to deter our adversaries.

    d. Establish a new, joint Complex Weapons Portfolio Office, embedded with OCCAR, through which we will deliver our joint projects within OCCAR, starting with SCALP & Storm Shadow acquisition and also working closely with MBDA to identify the opportunities from our investments and to reduce duplication, working closely with MBDA, starting with studies on Air Dominance and Cooperative Strike future capabilities.

    e. Focus greater efforts on integrated air and missile defence (IAMD) in our capability relationship, including (but not limited to) C-UAS and counter-hypersonic capabilities, drawing especially from the Aster family increments, including potentially SAMP/T NG and CAMM.

    f. Continue to work closely on current and future long range strike capabilities through the European Long Range Strike Approach (ELSA initiative). Along with our ELSA allies (amongst them Germany), we will remain open to expanding this cooperation to extended-range deep strike capability should military requirements and industrial capacity align. We will be carefully examining, with our defence industries, the capability opportunities this presents.

    g Develop a Directed Energy Weapons partnership, sharing information, collaborating on research and projects of shared interest, and exploring industry collaboration on radiofrequency weapons.

    h. Collaborate on developing algorithms for synchronised missile and drone strikes using artificial intelligence and machine learning, to build our future interoperability.

    i. Explore a combat air interoperability roadmap, including potential collaboration on armaments, to support the connectivity and interoperability of our current and future combat air forces and their contribution to European and NATO air superiority.

    j. Commit to align standards for weapons safety and testing, to bring operational benefits and save time and money in our joint programmes.

    k. Work closely together on wider export campaigns for UK-French capabilities and establishing a new joint team, with an initial focus on supporting the export of A400M (including through the set up of a NATO High Visibility Project) and identifying further concrete areas for joint export promotion.

    l. Recognising the importance of improving European defence industrial resilience, the UK and France will enhance reciprocal market access in defence and security.

    4.  Develop new cooperation in every domain to enhance military interoperability and support NATO, driven by annual meetings of our Joint Chiefs. This will include:

    a. Developing a new Bilateral Vision Statement between the armies and committing to enduring support to NATO through the CJF. This represents operational interoperability at the highest level of fielded forces in our armies, enhancing British and French joint commitments and opportunities offered through the Forward Land Forces in Estonia.

    b. Driving naval interoperability in support of warfighting, notably on information, data and communications, leveraging the opportunities of next generation digital architectures, deepening cooperation on maritime air defence, and continuing to coordinate Carrier Strike Group activity. Additionally, expanding cooperation on global maritime domain awareness to better deter maritime hybrid threats, including to critical undersea infrastructure and sanctions circumvention by the Russian Shadow Fleet, with an initial focus on the Channel and the Atlantic. Finally, facilitating mutual access support facilities for naval aircraft and warships.

    c. Increasing the complexity of combined Air Defence exercises, cooperating on responses to High-Altitude threats, enhancing cooperation in the development of Counter-Unmanned Aerial Systems (C-UAS) capabilities, particularly in the integration of Command And Control (C2) systems. Pursuing a joint ambition to develop the A400M into a multi-mission platform, incorporating C2, Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance (ISR) and potential strike capabilities. Aiming to synchronise fast jet pilot training to enhance interoperability and efficiency.

    d. Enabling interoperability across the space domain, including satellite communications capabilities, developing cooperation and potential joint capability in space control, space-based ISR systems, and Low Earth Orbit satellites. We will jointly spearhead closer operational space coordination and deliver space support to bolster Euro-Atlantic security operations.

    e. Sharing best practice in Cyber, with the UK providing support to the French establishment of a Cyber Training Academy, and France supporting the establishment of the UK’s new Cyber & Electromagnetic Command. Jointly galvanising wider NATO Cyber exercise activity, whilst fusing UK-French operational cooperation to act amongst Allies as European leaders in the domain.

    5. Reinforce the UK-France integrated defence and security partnership to deter and respond to the full spectrum of threats, by endeavouring to:

    a. Work together to make the fullest possible use of the UK-EU Security and Defence Partnership. Noting the shared UK and EU commitment to explore possible mutual involvement in respective defence initiatives, including within the Security Action For Europe (SAFE) instrument, in accordance with the respective legal frameworks, the UK and France will explore possibilities for mutually beneficial enhanced cooperation.

    b. Strengthen our defence and security policy coordination and cooperation on key areas for Euro-Atlantic security (Ukraine, NATO, the future of Euro-Atlantic security) and reasserting the unique contribution of our bilateral partnership to European and global security.

    c. Exploit areas of policy dialogue and cooperation in countering hybrid threats, Space, Cyber and AI – including through fostering links between national agencies, exchanging doctrines and responsible practices.

    d. Launch a new Global Maritime Security Dialogue to cohere our strategic approaches to deterring threats to our shared maritime interests.

    e. Establishing a dialogue on Humanitarian Assistance and Disaster Relief to build on our existing frameworks and scope future mutual assistance arrangements.

    f. Coordinate and align resources to enhance regional resilience, including on maritime security, in the Indo-Pacific in the medium-term and, in accordance with our respective international obligations, provide for reciprocal base access to facilities, including Réunion Island, New Caledonia and French Polynesia.

    g. Bring together our intelligence, law enforcement and policy expertise across the overt and covert environments to deter, counter and respond to the full range of hybrid threats including physical threats to people, sabotage and foreign interference, including Foreign Information Manipulation and Interference (FIMI), cyber and espionage.  Jointly pursuing attributions and coordinating on sanctions, as well as exploring how we can further lead joint operational efforts to combat the hybrid threats. We will continue our cooperation in NATO, G7 and other multilateral forums.

    h. Further strengthen our cooperation to counter FIMI, to raise the costs for states seeking to undermine our security and democratic institutions. We will pursue the interoperability of our systems to analyse FIMI and increase efforts to jointly respond to it, including through exposure, sanctions and strategic communication. We will continue working together to build collective responses to FIMI in multilateral fora.

    i. Build on the UK-French Pall Mall Process and the Paris Call for Trust and Security in Cyberspace, to tackle the threat posed by the proliferation of commercial cyber intrusion capabilities and address the shared challenges we face in cyberspace, and increase the cost to our adversaries through deterrence, sanctions and attributions.

    j. Engage in regular technical exchanges and proactively exploring joint research opportunities to harness the transformative potential of Artificial Intelligence and emerging technologies, while addressing associated national security challenges. The UK and France are uniquely placed to lead international efforts and response capabilities.

    k. Jointly maximise our impact against the highest-threat terrorist groups. Internationally, we will deepen our cooperation with Syria, and will look to enhance our coordination against the expanding terrorist threat in sub-Saharan Africa and central Asia. Domestically, we will build resilience against terrorist threats to critical infrastructure, including transport connections between our countries.

    6. Enhance communications and institutional exchanges across our two systems, as an enabler to our strengthened partnership across the entirety of defence and national security, by endeavouring to:

    a. Develop a new joint UK-France cross government secure communication system.

    b. Expand people and training links between the UK and French Militaries, optimising our networks of exchange and liaison officers, with a focus on junior officer exchanges, to develop a shared strategic culture in the next generation of military leaders across all three services.

    c. Continue to enable the constant exchange of national security and defence personnel and their families, to constantly deepen and forge our relationship for future generations and to ensure our Armed Forces have the conditions they need to perform effectively, and that they, and their family members, do not experience disadvantages as a result of their service. This might include reciprocal access to rights to work and related facilitations for defence personnel and their household members serving in each other’s countries.

    Updates to this page

    Published 10 July 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Bonfire decision

    Source: Traditional Unionist Voice – Northern Ireland

    Statement by TUV deputy leader Councillor Ron McDowell:

    “The decision taken by the PSNI to not move in against the South Belfast bonfire is both welcome and unsurprising.

    “Focus however must not be placed on the police at this time but rather blame must be parked where it belongs at the door of incompetent governance in Belfast City Council.

    “When the SP&R committee decided on Wednesday to formally ask the PSNI to interject against the bonfire the decision was not made in conjunction with advice from the PSNI, the fire service, NIE or any other statutory body but rather the vote came down on Orange and Green opinions around Unionist traditions.

    “In the middle of all of this we had some very suspicious calls from the Belfast City Council Chief Executive John Walsh who to aid the removal of the bonfire suspended the community safeguarding call-in process.

    “All in all this entire process has been a shambles from the start and whilst the decision from by the PSNI is the correct one I cannot help but think that if proper engagement from the council and replaced the partizan approach then we need not have walked this path.

    “I commend the bonfire builders for taking initiative — reducing the size of the fire unilaterally was both responsible and effective. That action embodies their victory.

    “Finally, I thank Jamie Bryson for having the courage to initiate the judicial review. His legal challenge helped prompt the scrutiny needed, and we now have the right resolution.”

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Launch of “green corridor” for student visa application facilitates more convenient human exchanges between China and Russia – Chinese Consul General in Khabarovsk Jiang Xiaoyang

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: People’s Republic of China in Russian – People’s Republic of China in Russian –

    An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    VLADIVOSTOK, July 10 (Xinhua) — The green corridor for student visas recently launched by the Chinese Consulate General in the Russian city of Khabarovsk has facilitated more convenient people-to-people exchanges between China and Russia, Chinese Consul General in Khabarovsk Jiang Xiaoyang told Xinhua.

    According to Jiang Xiaoyang, with the new academic year approaching, in order to facilitate the procedures for obtaining a study visa to China, the Chinese Consulate General in Khabarovsk will launch a “green corridor” for students from June 30 to August 31, 2025. During this period, the consular section of the Consulate General will provide services such as priority check in the system for an X-category visa /X1 or X2 visas are issued, respectively, for long-term study with a stay of over 180 days and short-term study with a stay of up to 180 days/ and out-of-turn service for students who personally submit their passports after online approval of the application.

    As the Consul General emphasized, China adheres to the course of high-level openness to the outside world and constantly optimizes the visa policy to facilitate more convenient exchanges between residents of China and foreign countries. According to him, humanitarian exchanges are an important part of Chinese-Russian relations, the parties closely cooperate in the field of education, the number of Chinese students in Russia and Russian students in China is constantly growing.

    Jiang Xiaoyang added that the Consulate General intends to create more convenient conditions for processing documents for young Russian students from its consular district who wish to continue their education in China. The diplomatic mission hopes that all students will achieve success in their studies, become successors of the cause of Chinese-Russian friendship, and promote cooperation between the two countries.

    The Chinese Consulate General in Khabarovsk reported that 116 Russian students have received visas to China through the “green corridor” to date. –0–

    Please note: This information is raw content obtained directly from the source of the information. It is an accurate report of what the source claims and does not necessarily reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    .

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Kaine Statement on Virginia’s Slip in ‘Top States for Business’ Ranking

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Virginia Tim Kaine

    WASHINGTON, D.C.—Today, U.S. Senator Tim Kaine released the following statement after Virginia fell behind North Carolina, Texas, and Florida in the CNBC’s Top States for Business report for 2025: 

    “Virginia’s slip in CNBC’s Top States for Business ranking once again highlights that the chaos and uncertainty caused by President Trump’s tariffs, the slashing of federal funding, and the politicizing and hollowing out of the federal workforce are gut punches to Virginia’s economy. While I’m glad to see Virginia ranked first in the education category, I worry we won’t hang on to it for long if Trump keeps meddling in our universities. I will continue to do everything I can to protect Virginia’s economy and schools from this disastrous administration.”

    Virginia ranked first on CNBC’s list multiple times while Kaine was governor, including during the list’s first-ever release in 2007.  

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Kaine Statement on Trump’s New Taxes on Americans to Protest Anti-Corruption Efforts in Brazil

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Virginia Tim Kaine

    WASHINGTON, D.C.—Today, U.S. Senator Tim Kaine, the top Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee on the Western Hemisphere, released the following statement after President Donald Trump pledged a 50 percent tariff on goods from Brazil in response to steps the country is taking to hold its former president accountable for attempting a coup:

    “The last thing Americans want is another trade war that will raise prices and throw businesses into uncertainty—and for what? To punish Brazil for taking steps to hold President Trump’s disgraced friend accountable for trying to overthrow its government? Trump is so sensitive about his own attempted coup on January 6 that he’s willing to put deranged political grievances and his own interests over what’s best for our economy. As multiple courts have ruled, most of Trump’s tariffs are illegal and an abuse of executive authorities. Using tariffs to interfere with foreign judicial proceedings takes abuse of power to a whole new level.

    “I will use all available means to block these latest job-killing tariffs, which are nothing more than a tax on American consumers.” 

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Canada: Major milestone for Indigenous-led innovation

    The Aboriginal Business Investment Fund (ABIF) helps Indigenous community-owned businesses thrive by supporting the purchase or upgrade of the equipment and infrastructure needed to create more jobs and continue contributing to sustainable, thriving communities.

    Alexander Chemical received a $400,000 ABIF grant in 2024, which helped turn its vision for growth into reality. With support from ABIF, this cutting-edge business is increasing its capacity to produce high-quality diesel exhaust fluid, which reduces harmful nitrogen oxide emissions in diesel engines. This expansion marks a major milestone in Indigenous-led clean technology and economic development.

    “This investment is what economic reconciliation looks like. Alexander Chemical is creating jobs and new revenue streams for the community of Alexander First Nation while leading the way in clean technology. It shows what’s possible when Indigenous communities have access to capital, partnerships and opportunity.”

    Rajan Sawhney, Minister of Indigenous Relations

    “On behalf of Alexander First Nation leadership and membership, we are beyond proud of Alexander Chemical and the expansion of its facilities. We would also like to thank Alberta’s government for its contributions through ABIF to help support this major milestone. This venture will be a vital part of the success of all parties involved, Alexander Chemical, Alexander Business Centre LP and Alexander First Nation. The economic impact this will have for our Nation is immeasurable and will be felt for generations to come. Mother Earth provides us many things we rely on daily, and we are grateful to Alexander Chemical for its commitment to finding solutions to protect the environment. Hiy Hiy.”

    George Arcand Jr, Chief, Alexander First Nation

    Alexander Chemical’s advanced equipment, capacity and expertise in high-end chemical testing and production are unique among Indigenous-owned businesses in Canada. In addition to diesel exhaust fluid, Alexander Chemical produces a wide range of environmentally friendly and sustainable cleaning, disinfecting and life science products, serving clients across multiple industries.

    Since 2014, ABIF has supported more than 100 Indigenous businesses, helping create nearly 1,000 jobs for Indigenous people in Alberta. Alberta’s government doubled ABIF funding in recent years, with $10 million available annually. Grants of up to $750,000 are available and applications are open until Oct. 15, 2025.

    With a suite of programs and initiatives focused on economic development, ABIF offers more options than ever before for Indigenous communities, businesses and organizations to find support as they develop and grow.

    Quick facts

    • Alexander First Nation is located about 60 km northwest of Edmonton.
    • Alexander Business Corporation is the Nation’s economic development branch, which owns and operates several companies across Alberta and in the community of Alexander First Nation.

    Related information

    • Aboriginal Business Investment Fund
    • Alexander Chemical

    Related news

    • Supporting Indigenous business development (Mar 21, 2025)

    MIL OSI Canada News

  • MIL-OSI Security: Officers cleared of misconduct following death in custody

    Source: United Kingdom London Metropolitan Police

    Two officers accused of failing to properly care for a man who died having knowingly swallowed drugs have been cleared at a disciplinary hearing.

    The hearing, which ended on Thursday, 10 July, found the allegations against PCs Justin Hulf and Mara Sow, both attached to the South Area Command Unit, not proven in connection with the death of Mikias Tekeste.

    The hearing had been directed by the Independent Office for Police Conduct after the Met disagreed with its assessment the officers had a case to answer for gross misconduct.

    Detective Chief Superintendent Nick Blackburn, who leads policing in the area, said: “Our officers have a clear duty of care to those in their custody. However, Mr Tekeste was responsible for his actions that day and knowingly swallowed drugs.

    “The hearing has found that the officers with him in the police van that day acted appropriately.

    “Our thoughts remain with Mr Tekeste’s family and friends for their loss.”

    On 15 July 2023, PCs Hulf and Sow identified Mr Tekeste, aged 30, as wanted on recall to prison. As they arrested him, he threw away a quantity of class A drugs. He was searched and placed in a police van to be transported to Croydon custody centre.

    During the journey, he removed two small packages from his trousers and swallowed them. The officers did not see him doing so.

    At the custody centre Mr Tekeste informed the custody officer he was withdrawing and a drugs test came back positive for cocaine and opiates. He was further arrested for possession with intent to supply drugs and placed on 30-minute observations. He became unwell in the cell and had multiple seizures, before falling unconscious. Emergency medical care was provided and paramedics attended. Mr Tekeste was taken to hospital but died from cocaine toxicity.

    As with all deaths in custody, the matter was referred to the IOPC.

    The IOPC investigation concluded that while the search of Mr Tekeste was appropriate, there was inadequate supervision in the police van and PCs Hulf and Sow should face a gross misconduct hearing.

    The panel found the officers acted correctly. Mr Tekeste deliberately concealed his actions while swallowing the drugs inside the police van. The risk assessment applied by the officers was accurate with the information they held at the time and the level of supervision and observation was adequate.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Security: Officers cleared of misconduct following death in custody

    Source: United Kingdom London Metropolitan Police

    Two officers accused of failing to properly care for a man who died having knowingly swallowed drugs have been cleared at a disciplinary hearing.

    The hearing, which ended on Thursday, 10 July, found the allegations against PCs Justin Hulf and Mara Sow, both attached to the South Area Command Unit, not proven in connection with the death of Mikias Tekeste.

    The hearing had been directed by the Independent Office for Police Conduct after the Met disagreed with its assessment the officers had a case to answer for gross misconduct.

    Detective Chief Superintendent Nick Blackburn, who leads policing in the area, said: “Our officers have a clear duty of care to those in their custody. However, Mr Tekeste was responsible for his actions that day and knowingly swallowed drugs.

    “The hearing has found that the officers with him in the police van that day acted appropriately.

    “Our thoughts remain with Mr Tekeste’s family and friends for their loss.”

    On 15 July 2023, PCs Hulf and Sow identified Mr Tekeste, aged 30, as wanted on recall to prison. As they arrested him, he threw away a quantity of class A drugs. He was searched and placed in a police van to be transported to Croydon custody centre.

    During the journey, he removed two small packages from his trousers and swallowed them. The officers did not see him doing so.

    At the custody centre Mr Tekeste informed the custody officer he was withdrawing and a drugs test came back positive for cocaine and opiates. He was further arrested for possession with intent to supply drugs and placed on 30-minute observations. He became unwell in the cell and had multiple seizures, before falling unconscious. Emergency medical care was provided and paramedics attended. Mr Tekeste was taken to hospital but died from cocaine toxicity.

    As with all deaths in custody, the matter was referred to the IOPC.

    The IOPC investigation concluded that while the search of Mr Tekeste was appropriate, there was inadequate supervision in the police van and PCs Hulf and Sow should face a gross misconduct hearing.

    The panel found the officers acted correctly. Mr Tekeste deliberately concealed his actions while swallowing the drugs inside the police van. The risk assessment applied by the officers was accurate with the information they held at the time and the level of supervision and observation was adequate.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI: OTSAW Announces Official Empanelment as Certified System Integrator for Singapore’s RoMi H Robotics Middleware Framework

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    SINGAPORE, July 10, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Otsaw Limited (“OTSAW” the “Company”, “we”, “our”) a global developer of autonomous robotics and operations-technology healthcare solutions, announces its official empanelment as a Certified System Integrator (“SI”) under the Robotics Middleware Framework for Healthcare (“RoMi‑H”) Empanelment Program 2025, effective 1 May 2025.

    RoMi‑H, regionally known as “Robotics Middleware for Healthcare”, is the national interoperability standard that enables diverse robotic platforms to communicate seamlessly with one another within building infrastructure (e.g., elevators, automated doors), and hospital IT systems such as within Singapore’s Public Healthcare Institutions (“PHIs”). OTSAW’s SI certification allows the Company to participate directly in upcoming RoMi‑H–compliant projects, reinforcing its goal to become a leader in smart‑hospital automation.

    “In a future where hospitals rely on a mosaic of robotic platforms, we believe middleware like RoMi‑H is essential for enabling them to work together safely and efficiently,” said Mr Ling Ting Ming, Founder and CEO of OTSAW. “Our empanelment affirms OTSAW’s role as a trusted partner in delivering interoperable robotics solutions that are expected to benefit both healthcare professionals and patients, and the SI certifications aligns well with our growth strategy as we prepare for our next phase of capital formation.”

    We believe this SI accreditation delivers a compelling set of strategic advantages for OTSAW and its stakeholders because. This certification serves as a national-level validation of the Company’s technical rigor and system integration expertise under a multi-agency framework recognized globally as a benchmark for healthcare robotics interoperability. The SI accreditation is also expected to unlock access to new robotics deployment opportunities across Singapore’s public healthcare institutions—regarded by some as among the most advanced hospital networks in Asia. The certification is expected to support long-term revenue generation through OTSAW’s integrated operational technology model, which combines hardware solutions with ongoing managed services. Furthermore, successful deployments within this highly regulated environment are expected to provide a high-credibility reference site, which should strengthen OTSAW’s positioning with international health systems seeking to adopt similar smart hospital technologies.

    Analysts project the global healthcare robotics market to exceed US $20 billion by 2030, driven by increasing demand for middleware solutions that ensure safe coordination among multi‑vendor fleets (Source: Fortune Business Insights, “Healthcare Robotics Market Forecast,” 2024). We believe RoMi‑H directly addresses this interoperability gap, having already earned international recognition, including a Global Robotics Innovation Award in 2021.

    OTSAW brings a decade‑long operating history to the healthcare sector, with robotic deployments in many of Singapore’s government hospitals. Our comprehensive operational technology model offering combines autonomous robots, AI‑driven fleet management, and 24/7 field support—capabilities that we believe readily translate to logistics, security, and inspection use cases beyond healthcare.

    About OTSAW

    We are a Singapore-based company specializing in autonomous mobile robots (“AMRs”) and robotics solutions, with cutting-edge robotics software development and manufacturing capabilities. Founded in 2015, we are an innovator in advanced robotics autonomy technologies and next-generation artificial intelligence (“AI”). Our mission is to disrupt, revolutionize, and redefine the global facilities management industry with our AI-enabled AMRs and robotics solutions across security, disinfection, last-mile delivery, and healthcare facilities.

    Leveraging our core software technologies, robot and machine outdoor autonomy expertise, and AI-enabled AMRs, our products empower customers to enhance productivity, reduce reliance on human capital, and seamlessly integrate automation into their facilities management operations. By addressing labor shortages, rising wages, and labor cost challenges, we aim to empower the entire facilities management industry globally.

    Forward-Looking Statements

    The statements contained in this press release that are not historical facts, including statements relating to Otsaw Limited’s expectations regarding the commencement and completion of its proposed public offering and listing, are forward-looking statements. You can identify forward-looking statements because they contain words such as “believes,” “expects,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “seeks,” “intends,” “plans,” “estimates,” or “anticipates,” or similar expressions which concern our strategy, plans, or intentions. By their nature, forward-looking statements are not statements of historical fact or guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks, uncertainties, assumptions or changes in circumstances that are difficult to predict or quantify. Our expectations and beliefs are expressed in good faith, and we believe there is a reasonable basis for them. However, there can be no assurance that management’s expectations and beliefs will result or be achieved, and actual results may vary materially from what is expressed in or indicated by the forward-looking statements. Any forward-looking statement in this press release speaks only as of the date of this release. Otsaw Limited undertakes no obligation to publicly update or review any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise, except as may be required by any applicable securities laws.

    Contact:
    Jules Abraham
    CORE IR
    +1 (212) 655-0924

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI: JAMining Launches AI-Powered XRP Cloud Mining Contracts Amid Market Surge, Offering Real-Time Passive Income

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    London, United Kingdom , July 10, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — The digital asset landscape is entering a transformative phase, and XRP, the cross-border payment token originally tailored for enterprise use, is now becoming a viable passive income stream for everyday investors. UK-based JAMining, a pioneer in AI-driven crypto infrastructure, has announced the launch of its XRP cloud mining contracts — a new generation of mining solutions combining smart automation, multi-currency flexibility, and real-time daily payouts.

    The move comes at a critical moment in the XRP ecosystem, as the token remains resilient above the $2.25 threshold and shows renewed bullish momentum. Daily transaction volumes have surged over 90%, signaling strong market engagement. Analysts now eye the $2.44 mark as a technical breakout point that could unlock broader upside, while long-term forecasts remain highly optimistic.

    A Smarter Way to Mine XRP

    JAMining’s latest product release allows users to participate in XRP mining without the burdens of hardware or technical expertise. Through AI-optimized algorithms, the platform dynamically allocates computing power across multiple assets — including BTC, ETH, DOGE, and USDC — based on market conditions, while rewarding users daily in their preferred cryptocurrency.

    “We believe cryptocurrency mining should be frictionless, transparent, and available to everyone,” said a JAMining spokesperson. “Our XRP contracts reflect this vision, giving users direct access to blockchain rewards without speculative risk or operational complexity.”

    Key Features of the XRP Mining Contracts:

    • Daily XRP Rewards: Real-time payouts with no hardware setup or maintenance
    • Multi-Asset Support: Earn in BTC, ETH, DOGE, USDC or XRP — with seamless switching
    • AI Yield Optimization: Real-time algorithmic distribution for maximizing returns
    • Global Accessibility: 100% remote control via web or app, anytime, anywhere
    • Capital Protected: Full principal returned at contract expiry, minimizing risk

    Contract Examples with Fixed Returns:

    One Platform, Global Reach

    Founded in 2004 and serving over 11 million users across 183 countries, JAMining is one of the few platforms combining full mobile accessibility with an AI-based mining strategy tailored for modern investors. Whether users seek short-term income or long-term digital asset accumulation, the platform’s contracts offer institutional-grade structure with consumer-friendly simplicity.

    In parallel with the rising demand for environmentally responsible mining, JAMining remains committed to green energy operations and transparent reporting, aligning its infrastructure with ESG standards and future-ready compliance.

    XRP’s Macro Trajectory & JAMining’s Strategic Timing

    As regulatory clarity around Ripple Labs improves and talk of potential XRP-related ETFs intensifies, investor sentiment is shifting toward structured, lower-risk exposure. JAMining’s XRP contracts provide a reliable bridge between speculative holding and consistent income — empowering users to benefit from XRP’s momentum without needing to predict price movements.

    “Whether you’re holding XRP for the long haul or just entering the ecosystem, JAMining offers a secure path to daily earnings that grows with the network.”

    About JAMining

    JAMining is an AI-powered crypto mining platform regulated in the United Kingdom, offering compliant, hardware-free investment access to high-yield digital asset contracts. Built on principles of transparency, automation, and accessibility, JAMining is redefining how users participate in the Web3 economy.

    Disclaimer: The information provided in this press release does not constitute an investment solicitation, nor does it constitute investment advice, financial advice, or trading recommendations. Cryptocurrency mining and staking involve risks and the possibility of losing funds. It is strongly recommended that you perform due diligence before investing or trading in cryptocurrencies and securities, including consulting a professional financial advisor.

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI: Oak Valley Community Bank Receives Approval on Over $5.3 Million in Grants Submitted to Support Modesto Gospel Mission and Tuolumne Economic Development Authority

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    OAKDALE, Calif., July 10, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Oak Valley Community Bank, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Oak Valley Bancorp (NASDAQ: OVLY), announced they have received approval on three 2025 Affordable Housing Program (AHP) grants which were submitted to the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco (FHLBank San Francisco) on behalf of Modesto Gospel Mission for a total of $3.75 million and Tuolumne Economic Development Authority (TEDA) for $1.596 million.

    These projects will bring meaningful and lasting impact to communities in Stanislaus and Tuolumne counties by expanding access to stable, supportive housing for vulnerable populations. Grace Place, sponsored by Modesto Gospel Mission, will renovate an existing shelter facility in Modesto to provide 67 transitional housing units, paired with essential wraparound services such as onsite case management, life skills training, job coaching, and recovery support. Hannah’s House, also by Modesto Gospel Mission, will convert a warehouse into 50 units of transitional housing, with residents gaining access to the Mission’s proven programs focused on personal empowerment and long-term independence.

    In Tuolumne County, the Westside Subdivision, sponsored by the Tuolumne Economic Development Authority (TEDA), will deliver 30 new single-family homes to serve very low- to moderate-income households, including six homes reserved for those experiencing homelessness. The development will also feature an 1,800-square-foot community center offering resident services such as job training and educational programs, along with recreational amenities like a basketball court and playground.

    As a sponsor of FHLBank San Francisco’s Community Investment Programs and advocate for the services Modesto Gospel Mission and Tuolumne Economic Development Authority provide to our community, Oak Valley Community Bank authored and provided supplemental input for this grant. “At Oak Valley Community Bank, we believe real change starts at the community level,” said Jose Sabala, VP Community Reinvestment Officer. “These grants are the result of strong partnerships with organizations rooted in compassion and service. Together with Modesto Gospel Mission and TEDA, we are investing in safe housing, supportive services, and brighter futures for our neighbors. This is what community banking is all about — showing up, working together, and making a lasting difference where it’s critically needed.”

    “We continue to make meaningful investments to address the affordable housing crisis across Arizona, California, and Nevada,” said Joseph E. Amato, interim president and CEO of FHLBank San Francisco. “This funding, delivered in partnership with our local member financial institutions, supports housing affordability solutions in urban centers, rural areas, tribal lands, and communities in need. We are helping to expand the housing supply and deliver critical support services to individuals and families who need it most.”

    Affordable Housing Program (AHP) grants from FHLBank San Francisco support the development of housing solutions for low- and moderate-income individuals across Arizona, California, Nevada, and other areas served by member financial institutions like Oak Valley Community Bank. In 2025, a total of $49.7 million in AHP grants were awarded to 31 affordable housing projects in Arizona, California, and Nevada, selected through a competitive application process. Grants are awarded to member institutions in partnership with qualified housing developers and community organizations to advance initiatives that address urgent housing needs. The AHP includes both a General Fund and a Nevada Targeted Fund, with awards granted to top-ranking proposals based on financial feasibility, project readiness, and impact on affordability. All AHP-supported projects are required to meet rigorous income eligibility and long-term retention standards, ensuring lasting access to affordable rental and owner-occupied housing. More information, including application guidelines and award criteria, is available on the FHLBank San Francisco website.

    About Modesto Gospel Mission:

    Modesto Gospel Mission is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization serving individuals and families experiencing homelessness and hardship throughout Stanislaus County. Since its founding in 1948, the Mission has delivered a comprehensive range of programs designed to support physical, emotional, and personal recovery. Key services include daily access to shelter, meals, showers, and clothing, as well as addiction recovery programs, life skill classes, employment assistance and training, a day program, a medical clinic, and an after-school youth center. These programs are intended to provide both immediate relief and long-term pathways to self-sufficiency. For more information, call (209) 529-8259 or visit www.mymission.org.

    About Tuolumne Economic Development Authority (TEDA):

    The Tuolumne Economic Development Authority, Inc. (TEDA) is a federally chartered tribal corporation established under Section 17 of the Indian Recognition Act of 1934. TEDA operates as a component unit of the Tuolumne Band of Me-Wuk Indians and is governed by the Tuolumne Me-Wuk Tribal Community Council. Created to advance the Tribe’s long-term economic vision, TEDA is responsible for financing, developing, constructing, operating, and maintaining economic development projects that support sustainable growth and economic self-sufficiency for the Tribal community. TEDA plays a central role in managing and expanding enterprise initiatives that strengthen the Tribe’s overall economic infrastructure. For more information, call (209) 928-9391 or visit tedainc.com.

    About Oak Valley Community Bank:

    Oak Valley Bancorp operates Oak Valley Community Bank & their Eastern Sierra Community Bank division, through which it offers a variety of loan and deposit products to individuals and small businesses. They currently operate through 18 conveniently located branches: Oakdale, Turlock, Stockton, Patterson, Ripon, Escalon, Manteca, Tracy, Sacramento, Roseville, two branches in Sonora, three branches in Modesto, and three branches in their Eastern Sierra division, which includes Bridgeport, Mammoth Lakes, and Bishop. The company will open its 19th branch location later this year in Lodi. For more information, call 1-866-844-7500 or visit www.ovcb.com.

    About the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco:

    The Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco is a member-driven cooperative helping local lenders in Arizona, California, and Nevada build strong communities, create opportunity, and change lives for the better. The tools and resources provided to FHLB member financial institutions propel homeownership, finance quality affordable housing, boost economic vitality, and revitalize whole neighborhoods. FHLBank San Francisco, together with its members and other partners, are making the communities they serve more vibrant and resilient and changing lives for the better.

    Contact: Chris Courtney/Rick McCarty
    Phone: (209) 848-BANK (2265)
      Toll Free (866) 8447500
      www.ovcb.com

    The MIL Network

  • Justice Department efforts to strip citizenship from naturalized Americans likely violate constitutional rights

    Source: ForeignAffairs4

    Source: The Conversation – USA – By Cassandra Burke Robertson, Professor of Law and Director of the Center for Professional Ethics, Case Western Reserve University

    New American citizens recite the Oath of Allegiance during a naturalization ceremony in Miami on Aug. 17, 2018. AP Photo/Wilfredo Lee

    The Trump administration wants to take away citizenship from naturalized Americans on a massive scale.

    While a recent Justice Department memo prioritizes national security cases, it directs the department to “maximally pursue denaturalization proceedings in all cases permitted by law and supported by the evidence” across 10 broad priority categories.

    Denaturalization is different from deportation, which removes noncitizens from the country. With civil denaturalization, the government files a lawsuit to strip people’s U.S. citizenship after they have become citizens, turning them back into noncitizens who can then be deported.

    The government can only do this in specific situations. It must prove someone “illegally procured” citizenship by not meeting the requirements, or that they lied or hid important facts during the citizenship process.

    The Trump administration’s “maximal enforcement” approach means pursuing any case where evidence might support taking away citizenship, regardless of priority level or strength of evidence. As our earlier research documented, this has already led to cases like that of Baljinder Singh, whose citizenship was revoked based on a name discrepancy that could easily have resulted from a translator’s error rather than intentional fraud.

    A brief history

    For most of American history, taking away citizenship has been rare. But it increased dramatically during the 1940s and 1950s during the Red Scare period characterized by intense suspicion of communism. The United States government targeted people it thought were communists or Nazi supporters. Between 1907 and 1967, over 22,000 Americans lost their citizenship this way.

    Everything changed in 1967 when the Supreme Court decided Afroyim v. Rusk. The court said the government usually cannot take away citizenship without the person’s consent. It left open only cases involving fraud during the citizenship process.

    After this decision, denaturalization became extremely rare. From 1968 to 2013, fewer than 150 people lost their citizenship, mostly war criminals who had hidden their past.

    A man dressed in a suit and tie speaks and points his right index finger.
    Sen. Joseph McCarthy appears at a March 1950 hearing on his charges of communist infiltration at the State Department.
    AP Photo/Herbert K. White

    How the process works

    In criminal lawsuits, defendants get free lawyers if they can’t afford one. They get jury trials. The government must prove guilt “beyond a reasonable doubt” – the highest standard of proof.

    But in most denaturalization cases, the government files a civil suit, where none of these protections exist.

    People facing denaturalization get no free lawyer, meaning poor defendants often face the government alone. There’s no jury trial – just a judge deciding whether someone deserves to remain American. The burden of proof is lower – “clear and convincing evidence” instead of “beyond a reasonable doubt.” Most important, there’s no time limit, so the government can go back decades to build cases.

    As law professors who study citizenship, we believe this system violates basic constitutional rights.

    The Supreme Court has called citizenship a fundamental right. Chief Justice Earl Warren in 1958 described it as the “right to have rights.”

    In our reading of the law, taking away such a fundamental right through civil procedures that lack basic constitutional protection – no right to counsel for those who can’t afford it, no jury trial, and a lower burden of proof – seems to violate the due process of law required by the Constitution when the government seeks to deprive someone of their rights.

    The bigger problem is what citizenship-stripping policy does to democracy.

    When the government can strip citizenship from naturalized Americans for decades-old conduct through civil procedures with minimal due process protection – pursuing cases based on evidence that might not meet criminal standards – it undermines the security and permanence that citizenship is supposed to provide. This creates a system where naturalized citizens face ongoing vulnerability that can last their entire lives, potentially chilling their full participation in American democracy.

    The Justice Department memo establishes 10 priority categories for denaturalization cases. They range from national security threats and war crimes to various forms of fraud, financial crimes and, most importantly, any other cases it deems “sufficiently important to pursue.” This “maximal enforcement” approach means pursuing not just clear cases of fraud, but also any case where evidence might support taking away citizenship, no matter how weak or old the evidence is.

    This creates fear throughout immigrant communities.

    About 20 million naturalized Americans now must worry that any mistake in their decades-old immigration paperwork could cost them their citizenship.

    A two-tier system

    This policy effectively creates two different types of American citizens. Native-born Americans never have to worry about losing their citizenship, no matter what they do. But naturalized Americans face ongoing vulnerability that can last their entire lives.

    This has already happened. A woman who became a naturalized citizen in 2007 helped her boss with paperwork that was later used in fraud. She cooperated with the FBI investigation, was characterized by prosecutors as only a “minimal participant,” completed her sentence, and still faced losing her citizenship decades later because she didn’t report the crime on her citizenship application – even though she hadn’t been charged at the time.

    A woman accepts a small American flag handed to her from a man across a counter.
    A woman receives a U.S. flag after passing her citizenship interview in Newark, N.J., on May 25, 2016.
    AP Photo/Julio Cortez

    The Justice Department’s directive to “maximally pursue” cases across 10 broad categories – combined with the first Trump administration’s efforts to review over 700,000 naturalization files – represents an unprecedented expansion of denaturalization efforts.

    The policy will almost certainly face legal challenges on constitutional grounds, but the damage may already be done. When naturalized citizens fear their status could be revoked, it undermines the security and permanence that citizenship is supposed to provide.

    The Supreme Court, in Afroyim v. Rusk, was focused on protecting existing citizens from losing their citizenship. The constitutional principle behind that decision – that citizenship is a fundamental right which can’t be arbitrarily taken away by whoever happens to be in power – applies equally to how the government handles denaturalization cases today.

    The Trump administration’s directive, combined with court procedures that lack basic constitutional protections, risks creating a system that the Afroyim v. Rusk decision sought to prevent – one where, as the Supreme Court said, “A group of citizens temporarily in office can deprive another group of citizens of their citizenship.”

    The Conversation

    The authors do not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and have disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. Justice Department efforts to strip citizenship from naturalized Americans likely violate constitutional rights – https://theconversation.com/justice-department-efforts-to-strip-citizenship-from-naturalized-americans-likely-violate-constitutional-rights-260353

  • MIL-OSI Security: Sioux City Woman Sentenced to Prison for Federal Firearms Convictions

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

     A woman who violated multiple federal firearms laws was sentenced July 9, 2025, in federal court in Sioux City.

    Maria Francisca Portalatin, age 53, from Sioux City, Iowa, pled guilty on February 7, 2025, to one count of being a prohibited person in possession of firearms, one count of making false statements during the purchase of firearms, one count of straw purchase of firearms, and one count of concealing a person from arrest.

     Evidence in the case showed that in April of 2023, Portalatin knowingly made false statements and representations on ATF forms to Dunham’s Sports Store in Sioux City in connection with her acquisition of multiple firearms.  Portalatin later admitted to law enforcement that she was an unlawful user of methamphetamine and purchased the firearms for Freddie Summerville who she knew was prohibited from possessing a firearm.  Evidence further showed, that in June of 2024, law enforcement executed a search warrant at Portalatin’s residence and located the four firearms she had purchased.  During an interview with law enforcement, Portalatin admitted she lied on the ATF forms and that she was aware that Freddie Summerville was wanted on a federal warrant.  In July of 2024, Portalatin and Summerville were stopped in a vehicle near Sioux Falls.  Subsequently, in an interview with law enforcement she admitted they were smoking methamphetamine and that she had helped harbor and conceal Summerville.  
     
    Sentencing was held before United States District Court Judge Leonard T. Strand.  Portalatin was sentenced to 51 months’ imprisonment and was ordered to pay $1,400 in fines and assessments.  She must also serve a 2 year term of supervised release following imprisonment.  There is no parole in the federal system.  
    This case is part of Project Safe Neighborhoods (PSN), a program bringing together all levels of law enforcement and the communities they serve to reduce violent crime and gun violence, and to make our neighborhoods safer for everyone. On May 26, 2021, the Department launched a violent crime reduction strategy strengthening PSN based on these core principles: fostering trust and legitimacy in our communities, supporting community-based organizations that help prevent violence from occurring in the first place, setting focused and strategic enforcement priorities, and measuring the results.

    The case was investigated by the Sioux City Police Department and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF) and was prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Kraig R. Hamit and Kevin C. Fletcher.  

    Court file information at https://ecf.iand.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/login.pl.  
    The case file number is 24-CR-04053.   Follow us on X @USAO_NDIA.
     

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Security: Sioux City Woman Sentenced to Prison for Federal Firearms Convictions

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

     A woman who violated multiple federal firearms laws was sentenced July 9, 2025, in federal court in Sioux City.

    Maria Francisca Portalatin, age 53, from Sioux City, Iowa, pled guilty on February 7, 2025, to one count of being a prohibited person in possession of firearms, one count of making false statements during the purchase of firearms, one count of straw purchase of firearms, and one count of concealing a person from arrest.

     Evidence in the case showed that in April of 2023, Portalatin knowingly made false statements and representations on ATF forms to Dunham’s Sports Store in Sioux City in connection with her acquisition of multiple firearms.  Portalatin later admitted to law enforcement that she was an unlawful user of methamphetamine and purchased the firearms for Freddie Summerville who she knew was prohibited from possessing a firearm.  Evidence further showed, that in June of 2024, law enforcement executed a search warrant at Portalatin’s residence and located the four firearms she had purchased.  During an interview with law enforcement, Portalatin admitted she lied on the ATF forms and that she was aware that Freddie Summerville was wanted on a federal warrant.  In July of 2024, Portalatin and Summerville were stopped in a vehicle near Sioux Falls.  Subsequently, in an interview with law enforcement she admitted they were smoking methamphetamine and that she had helped harbor and conceal Summerville.  
     
    Sentencing was held before United States District Court Judge Leonard T. Strand.  Portalatin was sentenced to 51 months’ imprisonment and was ordered to pay $1,400 in fines and assessments.  She must also serve a 2 year term of supervised release following imprisonment.  There is no parole in the federal system.  
    This case is part of Project Safe Neighborhoods (PSN), a program bringing together all levels of law enforcement and the communities they serve to reduce violent crime and gun violence, and to make our neighborhoods safer for everyone. On May 26, 2021, the Department launched a violent crime reduction strategy strengthening PSN based on these core principles: fostering trust and legitimacy in our communities, supporting community-based organizations that help prevent violence from occurring in the first place, setting focused and strategic enforcement priorities, and measuring the results.

    The case was investigated by the Sioux City Police Department and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF) and was prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Kraig R. Hamit and Kevin C. Fletcher.  

    Court file information at https://ecf.iand.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/login.pl.  
    The case file number is 24-CR-04053.   Follow us on X @USAO_NDIA.
     

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Security: Sioux City Woman Sentenced to Prison for Federal Firearms Convictions

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

     A woman who violated multiple federal firearms laws was sentenced July 9, 2025, in federal court in Sioux City.

    Maria Francisca Portalatin, age 53, from Sioux City, Iowa, pled guilty on February 7, 2025, to one count of being a prohibited person in possession of firearms, one count of making false statements during the purchase of firearms, one count of straw purchase of firearms, and one count of concealing a person from arrest.

     Evidence in the case showed that in April of 2023, Portalatin knowingly made false statements and representations on ATF forms to Dunham’s Sports Store in Sioux City in connection with her acquisition of multiple firearms.  Portalatin later admitted to law enforcement that she was an unlawful user of methamphetamine and purchased the firearms for Freddie Summerville who she knew was prohibited from possessing a firearm.  Evidence further showed, that in June of 2024, law enforcement executed a search warrant at Portalatin’s residence and located the four firearms she had purchased.  During an interview with law enforcement, Portalatin admitted she lied on the ATF forms and that she was aware that Freddie Summerville was wanted on a federal warrant.  In July of 2024, Portalatin and Summerville were stopped in a vehicle near Sioux Falls.  Subsequently, in an interview with law enforcement she admitted they were smoking methamphetamine and that she had helped harbor and conceal Summerville.  
     
    Sentencing was held before United States District Court Judge Leonard T. Strand.  Portalatin was sentenced to 51 months’ imprisonment and was ordered to pay $1,400 in fines and assessments.  She must also serve a 2 year term of supervised release following imprisonment.  There is no parole in the federal system.  
    This case is part of Project Safe Neighborhoods (PSN), a program bringing together all levels of law enforcement and the communities they serve to reduce violent crime and gun violence, and to make our neighborhoods safer for everyone. On May 26, 2021, the Department launched a violent crime reduction strategy strengthening PSN based on these core principles: fostering trust and legitimacy in our communities, supporting community-based organizations that help prevent violence from occurring in the first place, setting focused and strategic enforcement priorities, and measuring the results.

    The case was investigated by the Sioux City Police Department and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF) and was prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Kraig R. Hamit and Kevin C. Fletcher.  

    Court file information at https://ecf.iand.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/login.pl.  
    The case file number is 24-CR-04053.   Follow us on X @USAO_NDIA.
     

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI USA: Following Paramount’s $16 Million Settlement with Trump, Senators Markey and Luján Urge FCC to Hold Full Commission Vote on Paramount Merger

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Massachusetts Ed Markey
    Senators send letter to Commissioner Olivia Trusty urging her to support a full Commission vote on the merger
    Letter Text (PDF)
    Washington (July 10, 2025) – Senators Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.) and Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.), members of the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, today wrote to Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Commissioner Olivia Trusty, urging the FCC to hold a full Commission vote on the pending Paramount Global and Skydance Media merger. On July 2, Paramount Global, the parent company of CBS, agreed to pay $16 million to settle a frivolous lawsuit brought by President Donald Trump. In May 2025, as Paramount was reportedly pushing for the settlement to help facilitate approval of its merger, Senators Markey and Luján wrote to FCC Chairman Brendan Carr requesting that the FCC hold a full Committee vote on the Paramount-Skydance merger.
    In the letter, the lawmakers wrote, “As we explained in a letter to Chairman Brendan Carr in May, the Paramount-Skydance merger is unique in the FCC’s storied history, with the sitting President actively litigating against a news organization whose parent is seeking FCC approval of a major media merger. In that baseless lawsuit, Trump falsely alleged that CBS had violated state consumer protection laws through its editorial decisions around an interview of then-Vice President Kamala Harris. Although the transcript of the interview indisputably showed that Trump’s claims were a flagrant attempt to intimate the media, Paramount has nevertheless agreed to settle that lawsuit for $16 million. This settlement casts a shadow over the proposed Paramount-Skydance merger and raises serious questions about the editorial independence of one of the nation’s largest media organizations. The Commission cannot turn a blind eye to this context.”
    The lawmakers conclude, “For that reason, in our May letter, we urged Chairman Carr to hold a vote on the merger by the full Commission, instead of unilaterally directing the Media Bureau to approve it on its delegated authority. Commissioner Anna Gomez has similarly called for a full Commission vote on the merger. We respectfully request you to join her and encourage Chairman Carr to schedule a full Commission vote. The FCC owes the public a transparent, deliberative process on such a high-profile and controversial issue.”
    Senator Markey has aggressively pushed back on the Trump administration’s efforts to attack news organizations and intimidate the media. In March 2025, Senators Markey and Luján, along with Senator Jacky Rosen (D-Nev.), introduced the Broadcast Freedom and Independence Act, legislation that would prohibit the FCC from revoking broadcast licenses or taking action against broadcasters based on the viewpoints they broadcast. In February 2025, Senators Markey and Luján, along with Senator Gary Peters (D-Mich.), wrote to Chairman Carr and then-Commissioner Nathan Simington regarding the FCC’s recent, politically motivated actions against broadcasters and public media.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Submissions: Justice Department efforts to strip citizenship from naturalized Americans likely violate constitutional rights

    Source: The Conversation – USA – By Cassandra Burke Robertson, Professor of Law and Director of the Center for Professional Ethics, Case Western Reserve University

    New American citizens recite the Oath of Allegiance during a naturalization ceremony in Miami on Aug. 17, 2018. AP Photo/Wilfredo Lee

    The Trump administration wants to take away citizenship from naturalized Americans on a massive scale.

    While a recent Justice Department memo prioritizes national security cases, it directs the department to “maximally pursue denaturalization proceedings in all cases permitted by law and supported by the evidence” across 10 broad priority categories.

    Denaturalization is different from deportation, which removes noncitizens from the country. With civil denaturalization, the government files a lawsuit to strip people’s U.S. citizenship after they have become citizens, turning them back into noncitizens who can then be deported.

    The government can only do this in specific situations. It must prove someone “illegally procured” citizenship by not meeting the requirements, or that they lied or hid important facts during the citizenship process.

    The Trump administration’s “maximal enforcement” approach means pursuing any case where evidence might support taking away citizenship, regardless of priority level or strength of evidence. As our earlier research documented, this has already led to cases like that of Baljinder Singh, whose citizenship was revoked based on a name discrepancy that could easily have resulted from a translator’s error rather than intentional fraud.

    A brief history

    For most of American history, taking away citizenship has been rare. But it increased dramatically during the 1940s and 1950s during the Red Scare period characterized by intense suspicion of communism. The United States government targeted people it thought were communists or Nazi supporters. Between 1907 and 1967, over 22,000 Americans lost their citizenship this way.

    Everything changed in 1967 when the Supreme Court decided Afroyim v. Rusk. The court said the government usually cannot take away citizenship without the person’s consent. It left open only cases involving fraud during the citizenship process.

    After this decision, denaturalization became extremely rare. From 1968 to 2013, fewer than 150 people lost their citizenship, mostly war criminals who had hidden their past.

    Sen. Joseph McCarthy appears at a March 1950 hearing on his charges of communist infiltration at the State Department.
    AP Photo/Herbert K. White

    How the process works

    In criminal lawsuits, defendants get free lawyers if they can’t afford one. They get jury trials. The government must prove guilt “beyond a reasonable doubt” – the highest standard of proof.

    But in most denaturalization cases, the government files a civil suit, where none of these protections exist.

    People facing denaturalization get no free lawyer, meaning poor defendants often face the government alone. There’s no jury trial – just a judge deciding whether someone deserves to remain American. The burden of proof is lower – “clear and convincing evidence” instead of “beyond a reasonable doubt.” Most important, there’s no time limit, so the government can go back decades to build cases.

    As law professors who study citizenship, we believe this system violates basic constitutional rights.

    The Supreme Court has called citizenship a fundamental right. Chief Justice Earl Warren in 1958 described it as the “right to have rights.”

    In our reading of the law, taking away such a fundamental right through civil procedures that lack basic constitutional protection – no right to counsel for those who can’t afford it, no jury trial, and a lower burden of proof – seems to violate the due process of law required by the Constitution when the government seeks to deprive someone of their rights.

    The bigger problem is what citizenship-stripping policy does to democracy.

    When the government can strip citizenship from naturalized Americans for decades-old conduct through civil procedures with minimal due process protection – pursuing cases based on evidence that might not meet criminal standards – it undermines the security and permanence that citizenship is supposed to provide. This creates a system where naturalized citizens face ongoing vulnerability that can last their entire lives, potentially chilling their full participation in American democracy.

    The Justice Department memo establishes 10 priority categories for denaturalization cases. They range from national security threats and war crimes to various forms of fraud, financial crimes and, most importantly, any other cases it deems “sufficiently important to pursue.” This “maximal enforcement” approach means pursuing not just clear cases of fraud, but also any case where evidence might support taking away citizenship, no matter how weak or old the evidence is.

    This creates fear throughout immigrant communities.

    About 20 million naturalized Americans now must worry that any mistake in their decades-old immigration paperwork could cost them their citizenship.

    A two-tier system

    This policy effectively creates two different types of American citizens. Native-born Americans never have to worry about losing their citizenship, no matter what they do. But naturalized Americans face ongoing vulnerability that can last their entire lives.

    This has already happened. A woman who became a naturalized citizen in 2007 helped her boss with paperwork that was later used in fraud. She cooperated with the FBI investigation, was characterized by prosecutors as only a “minimal participant,” completed her sentence, and still faced losing her citizenship decades later because she didn’t report the crime on her citizenship application – even though she hadn’t been charged at the time.

    A woman receives a U.S. flag after passing her citizenship interview in Newark, N.J., on May 25, 2016.
    AP Photo/Julio Cortez

    The Justice Department’s directive to “maximally pursue” cases across 10 broad categories – combined with the first Trump administration’s efforts to review over 700,000 naturalization files – represents an unprecedented expansion of denaturalization efforts.

    The policy will almost certainly face legal challenges on constitutional grounds, but the damage may already be done. When naturalized citizens fear their status could be revoked, it undermines the security and permanence that citizenship is supposed to provide.

    The Supreme Court, in Afroyim v. Rusk, was focused on protecting existing citizens from losing their citizenship. The constitutional principle behind that decision – that citizenship is a fundamental right which can’t be arbitrarily taken away by whoever happens to be in power – applies equally to how the government handles denaturalization cases today.

    The Trump administration’s directive, combined with court procedures that lack basic constitutional protections, risks creating a system that the Afroyim v. Rusk decision sought to prevent – one where, as the Supreme Court said, “A group of citizens temporarily in office can deprive another group of citizens of their citizenship.”

    The authors do not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and have disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. Justice Department efforts to strip citizenship from naturalized Americans likely violate constitutional rights – https://theconversation.com/justice-department-efforts-to-strip-citizenship-from-naturalized-americans-likely-violate-constitutional-rights-260353

    MIL OSI

  • MIL-OSI USA: N.M. Delegation Welcomes Over $4.3 Million to Improve New Mexico’s Airports

    US Senate News:

    Source: US Senator for New Mexico Ben Ray Luján

    WASHINGTON — U.S. Senators Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.) and Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.), and U.S. Representatives Teresa Leger Fernández (D-N.M.), Melanie Stansbury (D-N.M.), and Gabe Vasquez (D-N.M.) are welcoming $4,384,758 from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for upgrades at the Albuquerque International Sunport, Artesia Municipal Airport, and Socorro Municipal Airport.

    These grants are funded through the FAA’s Airport Improvement Program, which provides grants for the planning and development of public-use airports.

    “When we invest in New Mexico’s airports, we invest in the people who rely on these facilities to do business in our state, create jobs, and contribute to our economy,” said Heinrich, a member of the Senate Appropriations Committee. “I am proud to welcome over $4.3 million to make improvements at the Albuquerque International Sunport and the Artesia and Socorro Municipal Airports. I will keep fighting to bring investments home to modernize our airports, improve travelers’ experiences, and drive our state’s economic growth for the future.”

    “Airports across New Mexico are critical hubs for transportation and local economies,” said Luján. “I’m proud to welcome over $4 million in federal funding for airports in Albuquerque, Artesia, and Socorro. These investments will improve safety, support local jobs, and help our airports better serve New Mexicans and visitors alike.”

    “Investing in our infrastructure keeps our communities connected and creates a foundation for prosperity in rural New Mexico. This $4,384,758 in federal funding will bring much-needed investments to not only New Mexico’s largest airport, but also our rural airports. Maintaining runways and infrastructure is the quiet work that is essential to keep our planes and passengers safe.” said Leger Fernández. “Connecting New Mexico diversifies our economy and creates local jobs across the state.”

    “Our airports are vital lifelines for trade, tourism, and connecting our communities to family and friends outside of New Mexico,” said Stansbury. “This $4.3 million for infrastructure updates for three airports across the state, including NM-01’s very own Sunport, will ensure they stay safe and efficient hubs for New Mexicans and visitors.”

    “From the Sunport to Socorro and Artesia, these airport upgrades will improve accessibility and connectivity for New Mexicans,” said Vasquez. “Safer roads, modernized runways, and new equipment mean better service for travelers and stronger support for local industries like agriculture, energy, and tourism. We’re making sure New Mexico isn’t left behind when it comes to infrastructure that keeps people and goods moving.”

    The breakdown of the FAA funding for New Mexico is below:

    FAA Funding for New Mexico

    Airport Project Description Grant Amount
    Albuquerque International Sunport This project rehabilitates 10,500 feet of existing terminal access road to extend its useful life. $3,656,508
    Artesia Municipal Airport This grant funds phase 1, which consists of design. This project rehabilitates 6,800 feet of existing paved Runway 4/22 to maintain the structural integrity and minimize foreign object debris to extend its useful life. $128,250
    Socorro Municipal Airport This grant funds a portion of the final phase, which consists of construction. This project constructs a new 2,700 square foot snow removal equipment building to bring the airport into conformity with current standards. $600,000

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Security: Two Former West Virginia Correctional Officers Sentenced to Prison for Federal Civil Rights Crimes in Connection with Death of Inmate

    Source: US FBI

    CHARLESTON, W.Va. – Two former correctional officers from the Southern Regional Jail in Beaver, West Virginia, were sentenced today for their roles in an assault that resulted in the death of a pretrial detainee, identified by the initials Q.B., on March 1, 2022. Mark Holdren, 41, of Beckley, was sentenced to 20 years in prison and Johnathan Walters, 33, of Rainelle, was sentenced to 21 years in prison, with each prison sentence to be followed by three years of supervised release.

    Holdren and Walters each pleaded guilty to conspiring with other officers to violate inmate Q.B.’s civil rights, resulting in Q.B.’s death. According to court documents filed in connection with the guilty pleas, Holdren responded to a call for officer assistance after Q.B. tried to push past another correctional officer and leave his assigned pod. When Holdren arrived, officers were engaged in restraining Q.B. Holdren began using force against Q.B., including multiple knee-strikes that he knew were unreasonable.

    Holdren and other officers then conspired to violate Q.B.’s civil rights by unlawfully assaulting him as punishment for his attempt to leave the pod. As a part of the conspiracy, Holdren and other officers brought Q.B. to an interview room, where Walters joined them. In the interview room, Holdren and other officers used unreasonable force against Q.B., including striking Q.B. in the head multiple times, kicking, knee-striking him, pulling and twisting his fingers, and using pepper spray, all while Q.B. was restrained, handcuffed and posed no threat to anyone.

    After assaulting Q.B. in the interview room, officers transported him to another pod. During the transport, Q.B. became limp and was unable to walk on his own. Walters and other officers then carried Q.B. by his arms and legs to the pod’s entryway door, where Walters admitted he used unreasonable force to swing Q.B.’s head into the metal door to open the door. Walters and other officers then carried Q.B. into a cell, where they dropped the unresponsive and handcuffed Q.B. onto the concrete floor. Shortly thereafter, responding emergency medical personnel declared that Q.B. was deceased.

    With their guilty pleas, Holdren and Walters each further admitted knowing that the interview room to which officers brought Q.B. was a “blind spot” – meaning, there were no surveillance cameras to record what happened there. Holdren and Walters were aware that, prior to the assault of Q.B. on March 1, 2022, officers would bring inmates, including pretrial detainees, who had engaged in misconduct to “blind spots” in the jail, so that officers could use unreasonable force without being captured on video, thereby avoiding accountability for their actions. Holdren and Walters each further admitted knowing that officers could not use unreasonable force to punish inmates, including pretrial detainees such as Q.B.  

    United States District Judge Joseph R. Goodwin imposed today’s sentences.

    Holdren and Walters are two of six correctional officers who were indicted in this case. In November 2024, defendant Corey Snyder pleaded guilty in connection with the use of unreasonable force against Q.B., resulting in his death. Jacob Boothe pleaded guilty in August 2024 to failing to intervene to protect Q.B. from the officers’ assault. Snyder and Boothe are scheduled for sentencing before Judge Goodwin on July 10, 2025.

    Ashley Toney pleaded guilty on August 8, 2024, to failing to intervene to protect Q.B. from the officers’ assault. Judge Goodwin sentenced Toney, 25, of Fairdale, to six years and six months in prison on June 9, 2025.

    On January 27, 2025, a federal jury returned guilty verdict at trial for the sixth indicted defendant, Chad Lester, a former lieutenant at the Southern Regional Jail, finding him guilty on three obstruction of justice charges for his role in conspiring to cover up the death of Q.B. Judge Goodwin sentenced Lester, 35, of Odd, to 17 years and six months in prison on May 15, 2025.

    Prior to the indictment of the six defendants, former correctional officers Steven Nicholas Wimmer and Andrew Fleshman each pleaded guilty to conspiring to use unreasonable force against Burks. Chief United States District Judge Frank W. Volk sentenced Wimmer, 26, of Bluefield, to nine years in prison on May 7, 2025. Fleshman, 23, of Shady Spring, is scheduled for sentencing before Chief Judge Volk on July 14, 2025.

    Assistant Attorney General Harmeet K. Dhillon of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division and Acting United States Attorney Lisa G. Johnston for the Southern District of West Virginia made today’s announcement.

    The FBI Pittsburgh Field Office investigated the case.

    Deputy Chief Christine M. Siscaretti and Trial Attorney Tenette Smith of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division prosecuted the case in partnership with the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of West Virginia.

    A copy of this press release is located on the website of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of West Virginia. Related court documents and information can be found on PACER by searching for Case No. 5:23-cr-188.

    ###

     

     

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Security: Jury Convicts Tallahassee Man of Attempting to Entice a Minor to Engage in Sexual Activity

    Source: US FBI

    TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA – Jelani Amari Petersen, 28, of Tallahassee, Florida, was found guilty by a federal jury yesterday of attempting to entice a minor to engage in unlawful sexual activity. The verdict was announced by John P. Heekin, United States Attorney for the Northern District of Florida.

    U.S. Attorney Heekin said: “I am proud of the great work by my office and our state and federal law enforcement partners to take this sex offender off our streets. This case exemplifies the mission set forth by President Donald J. Trump and Attorney General Pamela Bondi: protect America’s children against predators like this defendant. My office will continue to aggressively prosecute such offenses to keep our most vulnerable members of the community safe from the predations of these sick individuals.”

    Trial testimony demonstrated that in September 2024, federal, state, and local law enforcement executed Operation Lifeguard, an undercover operation designed to apprehend individuals who use the Internet to sexually exploit children online. During the operation, Petersen communicated with an undercover officer who he believed to be a minor female, and expressed interest in engaging in sexual activity with the child in exchange for money. When Petersen arrived at a pre-arranged meeting location, law enforcement arrested him and searched his car. A subsequent search of his cellular phone, confirmed his communication with the undercover officers.

    Petersen faces a minimum mandatory sentence of 10 years in federal prison and a maximum of life imprisonment, followed by a term of five years to life of supervised release. He will also be required to register as a sex offender.

    The case involved a joint investigation by the Leon County Sheriff’s Office, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s Homeland Security Investigations. The case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Justin M. Keen and Meredith Steer.

    Sentencing is scheduled for October 3, 2025, at 11:00 am at the United States Courthouse in Tallahassee before Chief United States District Judge Allen C. Winsor.

    This case was brought as part of Project Safe Childhood, a nationwide initiative to combat the growing epidemic of child sexual exploitation and abuse. Launched in May 2006 by the Department of Justice and led by the U.S. Attorney’s Offices and the Criminal Divisions Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section (CEOS), it marshals federal, state, and local resources to better locate, apprehend, and prosecute individuals who exploit children via the Internet, as well as to identify and rescue victims. For more information about Project Safe Childhood, please visit www.projectsafechildhood.gov.

    The United States Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of Florida is one of 94 offices that serve as the nation’s principal litigators under the direction of the Attorney General. To access public court documents online, please visit the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida website. For more information about the United States Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of Florida, visit http://www.justice.gov/usao/fln/index.html.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Security: Former School Custodian Sentenced for Possessing Child Pornography

    Source: US FBI

    ST. LOUIS – U.S. District Judge John A. Ross on Wednesday sentenced a former high school custodian who bought child sexual abuse material to 63 months in prison followed by a lifetime of supervised release.

    Bernard Ray Mennemeier uploaded five videos containing child sexual abuse material to Dropbox, triggering an FBI investigation. The FBI conducted a court-approved search of Mennemeier’s Dropbox account, and then Mennemeier’s home. Mennemeier was in possession of both child pornography and child erotica. He admitted messaging someone on Twitter who sold him child sexual abuse material “numerous” times, his plea agreement says.

    “This case was especially concerning given that Bernard Mennemeier was working in a high school at the time he possessed child sexual abuse material,” said Special Agent in Charge Chris Crocker of the FBI St. Louis Division. “In addition to spending 63 months in federal prison, Mennemeier will never be allowed to work around children again because he will have to register as a sex offender.”

    Mennemeier, 58, of O’Fallon, Missouri, pleaded guilty in April to one count of possession of child pornography.

    The FBI investigated the case.

    This case was brought as part of Project Safe Childhood, a nationwide initiative to combat the growing epidemic of child sexual exploitation and abuse launched in May 2006 by the Department of Justice. Led by U.S. Attorneys’ Offices and the Department of Justice Criminal Division’s Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section, Project Safe Childhood marshals federal, state and local resources to better locate, apprehend and prosecute individuals who exploit children via the Internet, as well as to identify and rescue victims. For more information about Project Safe Childhood, please visit www.justice.gov/psc.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Security: Former School Custodian Sentenced for Possessing Child Pornography

    Source: US FBI

    ST. LOUIS – U.S. District Judge John A. Ross on Wednesday sentenced a former high school custodian who bought child sexual abuse material to 63 months in prison followed by a lifetime of supervised release.

    Bernard Ray Mennemeier uploaded five videos containing child sexual abuse material to Dropbox, triggering an FBI investigation. The FBI conducted a court-approved search of Mennemeier’s Dropbox account, and then Mennemeier’s home. Mennemeier was in possession of both child pornography and child erotica. He admitted messaging someone on Twitter who sold him child sexual abuse material “numerous” times, his plea agreement says.

    “This case was especially concerning given that Bernard Mennemeier was working in a high school at the time he possessed child sexual abuse material,” said Special Agent in Charge Chris Crocker of the FBI St. Louis Division. “In addition to spending 63 months in federal prison, Mennemeier will never be allowed to work around children again because he will have to register as a sex offender.”

    Mennemeier, 58, of O’Fallon, Missouri, pleaded guilty in April to one count of possession of child pornography.

    The FBI investigated the case.

    This case was brought as part of Project Safe Childhood, a nationwide initiative to combat the growing epidemic of child sexual exploitation and abuse launched in May 2006 by the Department of Justice. Led by U.S. Attorneys’ Offices and the Department of Justice Criminal Division’s Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section, Project Safe Childhood marshals federal, state and local resources to better locate, apprehend and prosecute individuals who exploit children via the Internet, as well as to identify and rescue victims. For more information about Project Safe Childhood, please visit www.justice.gov/psc.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI: Ripple’s Silent Rally: AI Detects XRP Whale Behavior 72 Hours Ahead — JA Mining Integrates Predictive Mining Models

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    LONDON, UK, July 10, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) —  In a surprising twist to an already volatile week, Ripple’s XRP has once again captured headlines—not because of what was announced, but because of what wasn’t. According to a leaked internal memo from a blockchain analytics firm, advanced AI systems detected an abnormal uptick in XRP wallet clustering and institutional cold wallet warmups more than 72 hours before XRP’s price spiked past $2.30.

    Behind this stealth accumulation trend, the memo points to JA Mining’s proprietary AI model, which was reportedly deployed across its data centers to scan behavioral shifts in staking, delegation, and transaction timing. The model, originally designed for cloud mining efficiency, has now been adapted to forecast reward yield potential based on pre-volatility indicators—a concept being dubbed “predictive mining.”

    “Our AI engines don’t guess price,” says Ethan Lang, Lead Architect at JA Mining. “They anticipate block-level behavior and optimize contract yield before the market reacts. That’s what separates us from typical cloud mining services.”

    Forecasting the Chain, Not the Chart

    While many investors look at candlestick charts or rely on market influencers, JA Mining has spent the last 18 months developing a system that maps on-chain behavioral patterns against reward difficulty in real time. This allows XRP mining contracts on the platform to adjust difficulty-based allocations hours before changes are confirmed by the broader market.

    This adaptive infrastructure has reportedly driven a 17% increase in yield efficiency across XRP and DOGE contracts since Q2 2025. As of this week, JA Mining is quietly rolling out an XRP Forecast Contract to early-access users.

                       Sample Contract – XRP Forecast Miner

                  Claim Your Forecast Mining Bonus – $100 for All New Accounts

    Smart Mining Is the New Passive Income

    JA Mining, headquartered in London and backed by renewable-powered data centers across the UK, Canada, and Southeast Asia, offers cloud-based mining contracts for Bitcoin, Ethereum, Dogecoin, and now AI-optimized XRP. With over 10 million registered users and a zero-hardware requirement, the platform is becoming a preferred passive income engine for both retail and institutional users.

    “We’re not just hosting miners—we’re training them,” adds Lang. “Our system doesn’t wait for a green candle. It responds to network behavior.”

    The platform’s smart dashboard displays real-time mining metrics, daily earnings, and referral stats, enabling even first-time users to manage crypto contracts like a professional asset manager.

    JA Mining vs Traditional Platforms

    Feature Traditional Mining JA Mining
    Hardware Setup Required Not needed
    Energy Consumption High 100% green-powered
    Market Response Manual AI-driven predictive
    Earnings Model Fixed or volatile Adaptive optimization
    Withdrawal Process Delayed Instant daily payout

    The Bottom Line

    With XRP’s future still tied to regulatory and market narratives, JA Mining is offering something radically different: not speculation, but preparation. As predictive mining becomes the next frontier, investors now have a way to leverage AI to earn—without trading, charting, or guessing.

    Ready to forecast your earnings, not just your hopes?
    Join JA Mining today: https://jamining.com
    Sign up and get $100 welcome credit + up to 7% referral rewards

    Attachment

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI: Origin Bancorp, Inc. Announces Second Quarter 2025 Earnings Release and Conference Call

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    RUSTON, La., July 10, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Origin Bancorp, Inc. (NYSE: OBK) (“Origin”), the financial holding company for Origin Bank, plans to issue second quarter 2025 results after the market closes on Wednesday, July 23, 2025, and hold a conference call to discuss such results on Thursday, July 24, 2025, at 8:00 a.m. Central Time (9:00 a.m. Eastern Time). The conference call will be hosted by Drake Mills, Chairman, President and CEO of Origin, William J. Wallace, IV, Chief Financial Officer of Origin, and Lance Hall, President and CEO of Origin Bank.

    Conference Call and Live Webcast

    To participate in the live conference call, please dial +1 (929) 272-1574 (U.S. Local / International 1); +1 (857) 999-3259 (U.S. Local / International 2); +1 (888) 700-7550 (U.S. Toll Free), enter Conference ID: 05905 and request to be joined into the Origin Bancorp, Inc. (OBK) call. A simultaneous audio-only webcast may be accessed via Origin’s website at www.origin.bank under the investor relations, News & Events, Events & Presentations link or directly by visiting https://dealroadshow.com/e/ORIGINQ2.

    Conference Call Webcast Archive

    If you are unable to participate during the live webcast, the webcast will be archived on the Investor Relations section of Origin’s website at www.origin.bank, under Investor Relations, News & Events, Events & Presentations.

    About Origin Bancorp, Inc.

    Origin Bancorp, Inc. is a financial holding company headquartered in Ruston, Louisiana. Origin’s wholly owned bank subsidiary, Origin Bank, was founded in 1912 in Choudrant, Louisiana. Deeply rooted in Origin’s history is a culture committed to providing personalized relationship banking to businesses, municipalities, and personal clients to enrich the lives of the people in the communities it serves. Origin provides a broad range of financial services and currently operates more than 55 locations in Dallas/Fort Worth, East Texas, Houston, North Louisiana, Mississippi, South Alabama and the Florida Panhandle. For more information, visit www.origin.bank.

    Contact Information
    Investor Relations
    Chris Reigelman
    318-497-3177
    chris@origin.bank

    Media Contact
    Ryan Kilpatrick
    318-232-7472
    rkilpatrick@origin.bank

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI: Docker and WeAreDevelopers Bring World’s Largest Developer Event to North America in 2026

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    BERLIN, July 10, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Docker, Inc.®, a provider of cloud-native application and AI-native application development solutions and infrastructure, and WeAreDevelopers, Europe’s leading community for developers, today announced a strategic partnership to co-host and launch WeAreDevelopers World Congress: North America, which is expected to be the continent’s largest developer-only event.

    To be held in September 2026, this will be the first time WeAreDevelopers brings its wildly popular format across the Atlantic. Part tech conference, part high-energy festival, the event is designed for developers of all stripes, from AI engineers and open source contributors to backend devs and cloud-native builders. No hype. Just real tools, real stories, and real people building the future.

    The event also signals a new era for Docker, blending its long tradition of engaging and community-driven developer events with WeAreDevelopers’ festival-like energy to create an experience that’s bigger, bolder, and more globally connected.

    “Developers are the heart of innovation,” said Don Johnson, CEO of Docker. “We’re thrilled to join forces with WeAreDevelopers to bring this global experience to North America. This event will celebrate the energy, creativity, and ambition that make this community so powerful.”

    WeAreDevelopers is recognized as Europe’s leading developer community, reaching over 2 million tech professionals through its platform. The organization is dedicated to supporting the professional and personal growth of developers by delivering valuable content, career opportunities, and outstanding events throughout the year. Among these events, the WeAreDevelopers World Congress has become a flagship gathering, attracting more than 15,000 attendees and 500 speakers, including tech legends like Steve Wozniak, Tim Berners-Lee, Amanda Silver, Joel Spolsky, and Cassie Kozyrkov, alongside rising stars and hands-on practitioners solving real-world engineering challenges.

    The decision to bring WeAreDevelopers World Congress to North America for the first time reflects a shared commitment to the future of software and the people building it. As co-host and presenting partner, Docker joins forces with WeAreDevelopers to deliver something developers have been asking for: the return of a truly immersive, community-driven event in North America.

    This moment is about more than scale. It’s about bringing the magic of WeAreDevelopers’ global conference to a new continent, and reigniting the spirit of DockerCon for a new era. With developers leading the charge into AI, cloud-native platforms, and open source innovation, this event will serve as a high-energy home for builders of all kind, a space to connect, explore, and shape what comes next.

    “We’re excited to bring our signature format to North America—with big-name speakers, live coding, and the kind of hallway conversations that spark real innovation,” said Sead Ahmetović, CEO and co-founder of WeAreDevelopers. “Together with Docker, we’re building the most inclusive, high-impact developer event in the U.S.”

    The announcement was made live at WeAreDevelopers World Congress in Berlin—first during an exclusive VIP event and then on the main stage just ahead of the European Coding Championships.

    More details, including registration and speaker line-up, will be released in early 2026.

    About WeAreDevelopers
    WeAreDevelopers runs a global platform for software and AI expertise – connecting developers with the skills, knowledge, and opportunities they need to grow. Through high-quality content, tailored career offerings, and world-class events, WeAreDevelopers supports the continuous development of tech talent and fosters a community of professionals who are shaping the future of the industry. The company gained global recognition as the host of the WeAreDevelopers World Congress, the world’s largest annual event for developers – bringing together over 15,000 participants and 500 speakers to share insights, exchange ideas, and explore the latest trends in technology. The international developer community gathers here alongside leading voices such as Steve Wozniak, Sir Tim Berners-Lee, Joel Spolsky, Amanda Silver, Cassie Kozyrkov, Garry Kasparov, Thomas Dohmke, Stormy Peters, and many more icons of the tech world. Learn more about WeAreDevelopers at www.wearedevelopers.com.

    About Docker
    Docker drives modern software development by making it easy to adopt container technology to radically boost productivity, security, testing, and collaboration at every step of the developer experience, including emerging AI workflows. Embraced by over 20 million developers worldwide, Docker’s unmatched flexibility and choice make it the preferred tool for developers seeking efficiency and innovation for creating modern applications. Learn more about Docker at www.docker.com.

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI Submissions: International students’ stories are vital in shaping Canada’s future

    Source: The Conversation – Canada – By Emilda Thavaratnam, PhD student, Leadership and Higher Education, University of Toronto

    Over the past decade, international students have navigated a complex and challenging landscape shaped by neoliberal policies.

    Neoliberal economic and political ideology upholds entrepreneurship, individualism, free trade, open markets, minimal government intervention and reduced public services for citizens.




    Read more:
    What exactly is neoliberalism?


    Neoliberal governance has transformed higher education into a mechanism for economic growth, shifting the burden of funding onto students.

    As my doctoral research examines, international students in Ontario’s colleges of applied arts and technology face barriers related to neoliberal restructuring. Drawing on interviews with students and front-line staff, my study examines experiences across five key themes: pre-arrival, housing insecurity, pandemic survival, precarious labour and future aspirations.

    Through these challenges, the resilience and drive of international students to build community reveal powerful forms of everyday resistance.

    This has been seen through their front-line work during the pandemic, their persistent pursuit of education and their collective efforts to challenge marginalization. Their stories are vital in shaping Canada’s social, economic and educational fabric.

    Shifts towards neoliberal education

    Since the late 1970s, higher education in Ontario and elsewhere has experienced significant changes. In the province, public funding per student has steadily declined, shifting the cost onto students, with higher educational institutions adopting models of privatization and corporatization to survive.

    Though higher education continues to serve the public good, these changes reflect a broader adaptation to the new economic realities driven by market principles.

    As David Harvey, a scholar of urban and political economy, explains, neoliberal approaches hold that economic growth and prosperity occur when markets are allowed to operate with minimal government regulation. Over time, these approaches have shaped policies and practices globally across various sectors, including education, media, corporations and international institutions such as the International Monetary Fund.

    Neoliberal policies are presented as naturally occurring or unavoidable; however, this framing prioritizes market principles over social protections and often masks the deeper political and social dynamics.

    Education as a product serving the job market

    Neoliberal values have reshaped the purpose and practice of higher education. The problem with this market-driven approach is it often prioritizes individual gain and profit over social equity and the public good. This shift aligns learning with market-oriented approaches.

    Scholars concerned with the adverse effects of neoliberal education policy highlight how education is often treated as a product designed to serve economic interests, with measurable outcomes and links to the job market becoming the primary focus.

    This shift is evident when policymakers and institutions prioritize competition, performance, metrics and individual achievement — often at the expense of collaboration, critical thinking and shared goals.

    COVID-19 pandemic

    The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the effects of neoliberal ideology in higher education, revealing both the precarity of post-secondary finance and living conditions for many international students.




    Read more:
    The pandemic exposed the vulnerability of international students in Canada


    When colleges and universities faced pandemic closures and uncertain enrolment, international students came under scrutiny as learners who pay high fees. They contribute more than $21 billion annually to the Canadian economy and pay an average of five times more than domestic students.

    It also became clear that international students make significant contributions to Canada by working on the front lines in sectors such as health care, long-term care and food supply chains.

    At the same time, this situation revealed broader tendencies rooted in the neoliberal market logic.

    During the pandemic, the federal government acknowledged how it has positioned international students as a flexible, commodified labour resource integral to the Canadian economy and essential services. For example, in April 2020, Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada announced it would “temporarily lift the 20 hour per week work restriction on study permit holders working off-campus during their academic session, provided they are working in an essential service or function.”

    While international student contributions are vital, this framing begs deeper questions around the protection of international students’ labour rights, student well-being and potential exploitation.

    Housing, food insecurity, high tuition

    Before the pandemic, many international students struggled with housing, food insecurity and tuition payments due to work restrictions and financial constraints.

    With the current cap in place as of 2024, it’s ironic that international students have been treated as both “essential” and “disposable” simultaneously.

    Despite facing housing insecurity, food shortages and inaccessible health care, international students have continued to demonstrate their resilience and resistance. Their efforts extend beyond individual acts of survival.

    Post-pandemic protest

    International students have also organized petitions, protests and advocacy campaigns to challenge unjust policies.

    For example, in November 2022, hundreds of students (domestic and international) rallied at the Ontario legislature in Toronto under the banner “Need or Greed.” A coalition of student associations representing 120,000 students united to protest.

    The protests were partly a response to unfair and unpredictable jumps in already high tuition fees for international students: the average undergraduate international tuition fees in Ontario rose from about $35,000 to just under $50,000 between 2018 and 2025. The coalition urged the provincial government and Colleges Ontario to freeze tuition for international students.

    Following these efforts, nationwide protests erupted in August 2024 when 70,000 international student graduates faced possible deportation due to tightened immigration rules. Students set up encampments outside the Prince Edward Island legislative assembly for three months to protest the 25 per cent cut in permanent resident nominations, which left many students in limbo.

    A notable aspect of this activism was the solidarity shown from labour organizations and people across the country. Laura Walton, president of the Ontario Federation of Labour, joined the protests in solidarity, stating: “Your right is our fight.

    The Naujawaan Support Network, an advocacy group for youth and international students based in Brampton, Ont., issued a statement declaring:“International students are not the cause of the crisis, but we are being made into scapegoats.




    Read more:
    International students cap falsely blames them for Canada’s housing and health-care woes


    Power of collective organizing

    Collective organizing and calls for action are powerful acts of resistance that transcend the neoliberal ideology of individualism. Through petitions and protests, international students demonstrate a profound commitment to their education and aspirations.

    As Canada continues to welcome international students, and post-secondary institutions, governments and public sector organizations navigate turbulent economic times, it’s essential to uphold the rights of international students.

    It’s also essential to provide the support necessary for them to succeed and affirm their value as vital members of the community.

    International students’ resilience offers a valuable lesson about the human capacity to reframe challenges and persist. Students and citizens across the country have a role in celebrating their contributions and building bridges to foster more resilient communities.

    Emilda Thavaratnam does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. International students’ stories are vital in shaping Canada’s future – https://theconversation.com/international-students-stories-are-vital-in-shaping-canadas-future-258271

    MIL OSI

  • MIL-OSI Submissions: Gene-edited pigs may soon enter the Canadian market, but questions about their impact remain

    Source: The Conversation – Canada – By Gwendolyn Blue, Professor, University of Calgary

    The Canadian government is currently considering approving the entry of gene-edited pigs into the food system.

    Using CRISPR gene-editing technology, genetic changes can be created precisely and efficiently without introducing foreign genetic material. If approved, these pigs would be the first gene-edited food animals available for sale in Canadian markets. My research examines how including the public in decision-making around emerging applications of genomics can help mitigate potential harms.

    These pigs are resistant to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS), a horrible and sometimes fatal disease that affects pigs worldwide. PRRS has significant economic, food security and animal welfare implications.




    Read more:
    What is gene editing and how could it shape our future?


    The United States Food and Drug Administration recently greenlit the commercial production of gene-edited pigs. Will the Canadian government follow suit?

    AquAdvantage and EnviroPig

    In 2016, Canada approved the first transgenic animal for human consumption — an Atlantic salmon called AquAdvantage salmon that contains DNA from other species of fish.

    This approval came more than 25 years after the genetically modified fish was created by scientists at Memorial University in Newfoundland. The approval and commercialization of AquAdvantage salmon faced strong public opposition on both sides of the border, including protests, supermarket boycotts and court battles. In 2024, the company that produced AquAdvantage salmon announced that it was shutting down its operations.




    Read more:
    The science and politics of genetically engineered salmon: 5 questions answered


    In 2012, the Canadian government approved the manufacture of a transgenic pig known by its trade name, EnviroPig. Created by scientists at the University of Guelph, EnviroPigs released less phosphorus than conventionally bred pigs.

    EnviroPig did not make it to market; the same year, the University of Guelph ended the EnviroPig project. Funding for the project had been suspended, in part because of consumer concerns.

    Government regulation

    Some researchers argue that government regulation of gene-edited animals should be less restrictive than for transgenic techniques. Gene editing introduces genetic changes that can occur with conventional animal breeding that is not subject to regulation. Gene-edited crops in Canada are treated the same as conventionally bred crops.

    Others insist that stringent government regulation is necessary for gene editing to identify potential problems and ensure that laws keep up with industry and scientific ambition. Regulation plays a vital role in minimizing risk, encouraging public involvement and building trust.

    Social science research has, for decades, demonstrated that resistance to biotechnology is not because of the public’s lack of knowledge, as is often argued by biotechnology proponents. Public resistance to biotechnology is better understood as a rejection of potential harms imposed by governments and industry without public input and consent.

    Ethical, moral, cultural and political concerns

    At present, little opportunity exists for public engagement in Canadian assessments of gene-edited animals.

    Similar to the U.S., Canada does not have specific gene technology regulation. Rather, the federal government relies on pre-existing environmental and food safety legislation. Canadian regulatory agencies use a risk, novelty and product-based approach to assess animal biotechnology. From a regulatory standpoint, distinctions between technical processes — like transgenic modification versus gene editing — are less important than the safety of the final product.

    The Canadian government has recently updated its federal environmental and health regulations. This includes introducing mandatory public consultations for animals (vertebrates, specifically) created using biotechnology.

    Even with these changes, there’s still room for improvement. Public engagement is limited to consultations conducted within a short time frame. Interested parties are invited to provide scientific information about potential risks of animal biotechnology to human health or the environment, but comments that address ethical, moral, cultural or political concerns are not taken into consideration.

    More broadly, regulatory and academic debates about the gene editing of animals are largely informed by scientists and industry proponents with considerably less input from the public, Indigenous communities and social sciences and humanities researchers.

    Consulting the public

    From a social standpoint, the process by which gene editing is assessed matters as much as the safety of the final product. Inclusive public engagement is essential to ensure that the production of gene-edited food animals aligns with societal needs and values.

    Reactions to gene technologies are based on underlying values and beliefs, and sustained opportunities for public reflection and deliberation are vital for responsible innovation.

    Important questions should be addressed: Who will reap the benefits of gene-editing techniques? Who will bear the costs and harms? What are the potential implications, including hard-to-anticipate social and political changes? How should decision-making proceed to ensure that Canadians have sufficient opportunities for input?

    Currently, for the gene-edited pigs, members of the public can submit comments to the government until July 20, 2025.

    Public reactions to previous biotech food animals in Canada — including AquAdvantage salmon and the EnviroPig — show that lack of inclusive engagement can contribute to the rejection of animal biotechnology.

    Gwendolyn Blue receives funding from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council. She is a member of Gene Editing for Food Security and Environmental Sustainability, a multi-university consortium based at McGill University, and funded by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.

    ref. Gene-edited pigs may soon enter the Canadian market, but questions about their impact remain – https://theconversation.com/gene-edited-pigs-may-soon-enter-the-canadian-market-but-questions-about-their-impact-remain-260627

    MIL OSI

  • MIL-OSI Submissions: Returning to the office isn’t the answer to Canada’s productivity problem — and it will add pressure to urban housing

    Source: The Conversation – Canada – By Dilara Baysal, Research Fellow in Sociology, Concordia University

    As companies face pressure to increase productivity, many are calling workers back to the office — even though there is limited evidence that return-to-office policies actually improve innovation or performance.

    In cities like Toronto and Vancouver, where many major companies are headquartered, this is putting pressure on people to live near expensive downtown areas.

    As of April 2025, average one-bedroom rents were $2,317 in Toronto and $2,536 in Vancouver, with North Vancouver even higher at $2,680. If return-to-office policies continue, more workers may be forced into these pricey city centres, adding pressure to already overheated housing markets.

    Since early 2025, return-to-office policies have added to Canada’s housing stress. The Royal Bank of Canada, for instance, now requires staff in the office four days a week, and Amazon ended remote work in January. While rents haven’t jumped yet, similar policies in the U.S. have already pushed up demand, and may be a sign of what’s to come.

    In Washington, D.C., rents rose 3.3 per cent after federal employees were called back to offices. Cities like New York and San Francisco also saw rent increases linked to companies like JPMorgan Chase, Meta and Salesforce reversed remote work policies.

    The myth of office productivity

    According to the Bank of Canada, Canada’s economy is being negatively affected by low productivity. Low productivity slows Canada’s economic growth and keeps wages low. It also makes inflation worse because supply can’t keep up with demand. A productive economy meets demand more easily, keeping prices stable.

    In response, many companies are pushing return-to-office as the answer. RBC CEO Dave McKay endorsed a return to the office back in 2023, saying that “the absence of working together” has hurt innovation and productivity.

    At Google, under mounting pressure to compete in artificial intelligence, co-founder Sergey Brin also pushed for full-time office work, calling a 60-hour week the “sweet spot” for productivity.

    But recent research shows the story isn’t so simple. A University of Chicago working paper found that strict return-to-office rules can cause senior staff to leave, which hurts innovation.




    Read more:
    Working one day a week in person might be the key to happier, more productive employees


    Another study of 48,000 knowledge workers in India found that hybrid setups — where some people are in the office and others work from home — can make it harder to share ideas and work together.

    Meanwhile, a Stanford-led study found that working in the office just two days a week kept productivity strong and cut employee turnover by 33 per cent.

    The determinants of productivity and their underlying factors. These determinants connect across industries, businesses and places.
    (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development), CC BY

    Where people live matters more

    Return-to-office mandates also aren’t a guaranteed way to boost productivity. A 2023 study supported by housing organizations across Canada found that affordable, well-located housing helps people find better jobs and specialize in their work.

    But when housing costs are high and commutes are long, productivity drops, especially for lower-income workers. Long commutes and high living costs create stress, limit mobility and cause people to miss out on job opportunities.

    Studies show that investing in technology and training workers matters much more. Research from the Canadian Research Data Centre Network finds that workplace training improves productivity in most sectors.

    A recent report from the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation also shows that high housing costs make it harder for many people to live in big cities, which ultimately reduces diversity in the workforce and weakens the economy.

    Affordable housing could boost productivity

    Housing in Canada is often viewed in two ways. One treats it as a commodity, where prices follow supply and demand. In this view, policies focus on increasing supply and offering market incentives. The other sees housing as a public need and a basic right, and calls for government action to ensure affordability and stability.




    Read more:
    Housing is both a human right and a profitable asset, and that’s the problem


    In practice, market forces can undermine policies designed to meet housing needs and ensure affordability. In Toronto, for example, developers resisted inclusionary zoning rules that require or encourage developers to include a certain percentage of affordable housing units within new residential developments. Instead, they delayed projects or chose to build high-end condos in different zones.

    This tension between housing as a commodity and housing as a public good is central to Canada’s current housing strategy. Prime Minister Mark Carney’s government has pledged to build 500,000 new homes annually by 2035 using tools like public lands, modular housing and tax incentives.

    While this supply-focused strategy targets long-term housing needs, it must also account for today’s complex economic realities such as inflation, increasing unemployment and economic stagnation due to lagging productiviy.

    Without tackling affordability and access directly, building more homes alone won’t be enough.

    Rising home prices and rents have played a major role in driving inflation. In Canada’s Consumer Price Index, shelter makes up about 29 per cent of overall household spending.
    (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development), CC BY

    The real foundation of a productive economy

    Return-to-office policies often focus too much on one thing: how much each worker produces. But that narrow view of productivity ignores what really supports good work: access to affordable housing, time for training and flexibility to relocate for better job opportunities.

    To address productivity challenges, companies should invest in job-specific training, digital skills and ongoing learning to help employees adapt to new tools and processes, and the should offer more flexibility. What workers need most are affordable homes, shorter commutes and real opportunities to grow — not added stress and rising costs.

    Dilara Baysal does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. Returning to the office isn’t the answer to Canada’s productivity problem — and it will add pressure to urban housing – https://theconversation.com/returning-to-the-office-isnt-the-answer-to-canadas-productivity-problem-and-it-will-add-pressure-to-urban-housing-260395

    MIL OSI

  • Indian Navy to induct first indigenous diving support vessel ‘Nistar’ on July 18

    Source: Government of India

    Source: Government of India (4)

    The Indian Navy is set to commission its first indigenously designed Diving Support Vessel (DSV) INS Nistar at the Naval Dockyard in Visakhapatnam on July 18, in the presence of Defence Minister Rajnath Singh.

    The vessel, built by Hindustan Shipyard Limited, Visakhapatnam, will be formally inducted into the Eastern Naval Command to support deep-sea diving and submarine rescue operations, the Navy said in a statement on Thursday.

    According to the Navy, INS Nistar showcases the government’s focus on self-reliance in defence manufacturing under the Aatmanirbhar Bharat initiative. Over 120 MSMEs contributed to the project, which has achieved more than 80 per cent indigenous content.

    The commissioning marks a step forward in the Navy’s vision of designing and building complex platforms within the country.

    The new DSV carries forward the legacy of its predecessor, ex-Nistar, a submarine rescue vessel acquired from the erstwhile USSR in 1969 and commissioned in 1971. The original Nistar served the Navy for two decades, playing a vital role in submarine rescue and diving operations.

    The ship’s motto, Surakshita Yatharthta Shauryam — which translates to Deliverance with Precision and Bravery — reflects its mission profile and operational capabilities.

    At around 120 metres long and displacing more than 10,000 tonnes, INS Nistar is equipped with a Dynamic Positioning System that allows it to maintain its position with high accuracy during complex operations.

    Its onboard diving complex includes both air and saturation diving systems, along with underwater Remotely Operated Vehicles (ROVs) and Side Scan SONAR, significantly expanding its operational scope. As the ‘Mother Ship’ for the Deep Submergence Rescue Vehicle (DSRV), the vessel will enhance the Navy’s submarine rescue preparedness.

    The ship is also equipped with an operation theatre, intensive care unit, eight-bed hospital and hyperbaric medical facilities, which are crucial for supporting rescue and diving missions.

    With an endurance of over 60 days at sea, the capacity for helicopter operations and a 15-ton subsea crane, INS Nistar is expected to be a versatile addition to India’s maritime fleet.

    The Navy said the induction of INS Nistar will boost India’s underwater operational capability and strengthen its strategic maritime posture across the Indian Ocean Region.