Category: Banking

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Financial news: No more than 100 thousand rubles can be transferred without opening an account using simplified identification

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: Central Bank of Russia –

    This is the maximum threshold set. by law, which came into force on May 30 this year.

    If you need to transfer more than 100 thousand rubles, you will need to undergo full identification or make a transfer using your bank account. Until now, the maximum threshold for the amount of transfer without opening an account has not been established by law.

    In addition, amendments have been made to the law that increase the amount of funds remaining in an electronic wallet opened using simplified identification from 60 thousand to 100 thousand rubles.

    For simplified identification, the financial institution must establish the citizen’s last name, first name, patronymic, series and passport number. For full identification, the address of the place of residence and TIN (if available) are also required.

    The new regulations are aimed at preventing opaque transactions that are carried out to launder illegal proceeds and finance terrorism, including with the help of droppers.

    Preview photo: Pixels Hunter / Shutterstock / Fotodom

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    Please Note; This Information is Raw Content Directly from the Information Source. It is access to What the Source Is Stating and Does Not Reflect

    HTTPS: //vv. KBR.ru/Press/Event/? ID = 24659

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Financial news: Package of documents for RNKO in the form of LLC

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: Central Bank of Russia (2) –

    1. Learn the necessary federal laws and regulations.

    2. Check the compliance of candidates for the position of managers and other persons of the organization being created with the stated qualification requirements and/or business reputation requirements.

    The list of persons is specified in Article 11.1 of the Law on Banks and Article 60 of the Federal Law of 10.07.2002 No. 86-FZ “On the Central Bank of the Russian Federation (Bank of Russia)”.

    The qualification requirements and requirements for the business reputation of these persons are established by Article 16 of the Law on Banks.

    To perform the check, we recommend using:

    3. Collect documents to assess the financial position of the founders of the NPO and other persons provided for by the Law on Banks.

    The procedure and criteria for assessing the financial position, as well as the requirements for the financial position are established By the Regulation of the Bank of Russia dated 28.12.2017 No. 626-P.

    4. Select a unique name for the non-bank credit institution being created.

    Requirements for the name are established by Articles 54 and 1473 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, Article 7 of the Law on Banks and the Bank of Russia Instruction dated 02.04.2010 No. 135-I.

    To check the names already in use, we recommend using the KGR KO and the Unified State Register of Legal Entities (USRLE).

    Before making a decision to establish a non-profit organization, the founders must send a request to the Bank of Russia regarding the possibility of using the proposed full corporate name and abbreviated corporate name of the credit institution (in Russian).

    5. Pay the state fee for obtaining a license to carry out banking operations.

    For the issuance of a license to carry out banking operations, a state fee is paid in accordance with subparagraph 93 of paragraph 1 of Article 333.33 of the Tax Code of the Russian Federation.

    The amount of the state duty is 0.1% of the declared authorized capital of the created credit institution, but not more than 500 thousand rubles.

    Payment order designer.

    6. Prepare and submit to the Bank of Russia a set of documents for state registration of a non-profit organization.

    A set of documents for state registration can be sent to the Bank of Russia via personal account, as well as by mail or courier to the Bank of Russia expedition.

    To create a non-banking credit organization in the form of a limited liability company, a “set of standardized documents

    7. Receive notification of the entry of information about the non-bank credit institution into the Unified State Register of Legal Entities and a certificate of registration from the Bank of Russia.

    After making a decision on state registration of a non-profit organization, the Bank of Russia sends to the authorized registration body the information and documents necessary for it to carry out its functions of maintaining the Unified State Register of Legal Entities.

    Based on the decision taken by the Bank of Russia and the information and documents submitted by it, the authorized registration body, within a period of no more than five working days from the date of receipt of such documents, makes a corresponding entry in the Unified State Register of Legal Entities and, no later than the working day following the day of making such entry, notifies the Bank of Russia of this.

    The Bank of Russia, no later than three working days from the date of receipt from the authorized registration body of information on the entry of a record of state registration of an NPO into the Unified State Register of Legal Entities, notifies its founders of this with a requirement to make a payment of 100% of the declared authorized capital of the organization within one month. The regulator also issues the founders a document confirming the fact of entry of a record of it into the Unified State Register of Legal Entities and a certificate of registration of the Bank of Russia, assigns the NPO a registration number of the Bank of Russia and enters information about it into the State Register of Legal Entities.

    8. Pay the authorized capital and obtain a license to carry out banking operations.

    Upon presentation of documents confirming payment of 100% of the declared authorized capital of the NPO, the Bank of Russia issues it a license to carry out banking operations within three days.

    Information about an NPO after its creation and issuance of a license is posted inDirectory of financial organizations on the official website of the Bank of Russia.

    The notice of state registration of a credit institution is published in“Bulletin of the Bank of Russia”.

    A non-bank credit institution has the right to carry out operations from the moment it receives a license issued by the Bank of Russia.

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Financial news: 05/30/2025 will be held the deposit auction Moscow Regional Guarantee Fund (2)

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: Moscow Exchange – Moscow Exchange –

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    Please Note; This Information is Raw Content Directly from the Information Source. It is access to What the Source Is Stating and Does Not Reflect

    HTTPS: //VVV. MOEX.K.MO/N90661

    Categories24-7, Mil-SOSI, Moscow, Moscow Stock Exchange, Russian Economy, Russian Federal, Russian Language, Russian economy

    Post Navigation


    Archives

    Archives

    Privacy Policy Proudly Powered by WordPress

    Parameters
    Date of the deposit auction 05/30/2025
    Placement currency Rub
    Maximum amount of funds placed (in placement currency) 100,000,000.00
    Placement period, days 31
    Date of deposit 05/30/2025
    Refund date 06/30/2025
    Minimum placement interest rate, % per annum 20.25
    Conditions of imprisonment, urgent or special Urgent
    Minimum amount of funds placed for one application (in placement currency) 100,000,000.00
    Maximum number of applications from one Participant, pcs. 1
    Auction form, open or closed Open
    Basis of the Treaty General Agreement
     
    Schedule (Moscow time)
    Preliminary applications from 14:00 to 14:15
    Applications in competition mode from 14:15 to 14:25
    Setting a cut-off percentage or declaring the auction invalid until 14:45
       
    Additional terms Interest payment at the end of the term

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Government launches pilot project on operational cooperation to combat cyber fraudsters

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: Government of the Russian Federation – An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.

    Order of May 28, 2025 No. 1350-r

    Document

    Order of May 28, 2025 No. 1350-r

    From June 4, 2025, Russia will begin implementing a pilot project for the operational interaction of government agencies, banks and telecom operators to combat cyber fraud. An order to this effect has been signed.

    The goal of the pilot is to create an effective mechanism for interaction between various state and non-state structures and to establish an exchange of information between them to prevent crimes using information and communication technologies.

    The platform for such interaction will be the state information system being created to combat violations in this area. During the implementation of the pilot project, the operation of this system will be tested. Thus, it is planned to determine the categories of data necessary for effective counteraction to cybercrimes, develop unified formats for providing data on offenses, and achieve automation of operational interaction. In addition, within the framework of the pilot project, it is necessary to develop preventive measures to combat fraudsters using digital communication channels.

    The participants of the pilot project from the state side will be the Ministry of Digital Development, the Ministry of Internal Affairs, the FSB, Roskomnadzor, Rosfinmonitoring, FSTEC, the Bank of Russia, the Prosecutor General’s Office and the Investigative Committee. The participants will also include the largest Russian banks and telecom operators and JSC National Payment Card System.

    The pilot project is scheduled to be completed in March 2026. Its implementation will provide new opportunities to protect citizens from fraudulent activities and enhance their security on the Internet.

    At the end of 2024, the Government approved the Concept of the state system for combating crimes committed using information and communication technologies. This document, among other things, defined the creation of a specialized digital platform for the prompt exchange of information between law enforcement agencies, credit institutions and communications operators as a priority area of activity.

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Financial news: The deposit auction of the Moscow Small Business Lending Assistance Fund will take place on 30.05.2025

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: Moscow Exchange – Moscow Exchange –

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    Please Note; This Information is Raw Content Directly from the Information Source. It is access to What the Source Is Stating and Does Not Reflect

    HTTPS: //VVV. MEEX.K.M.M.

    Categories24-7, Mil-SOSI, Moscow, Moscow Stock Exchange, Russian Economy, Russian Federal, Russian Language, Russian economy

    Post Navigation


    Archives

    Archives

    Privacy Policy Proudly Powered by WordPress

    Date of the deposit auction 05/30/2025
    Placement currency Rub
    Maximum amount of funds placed (in placement currency) 300,000,000.00
    Placement period, days 40
    Date of deposit 05/30/2025
    Refund date 07.07.2025
    Minimum placement interest rate, % per annum 20.25
    Conditions of imprisonment, urgent or special Urgent
    Minimum amount of funds placed for one application (in placement currency) 300,000,000.00
    Maximum number of applications from one Participant, pcs. 1
    Auction form, open or closed Open
    Basis of the Treaty General Agreement
     
    Schedule (Moscow time)
    Preliminary applications from 10:30 to 10:40
    Applications in competition mode from 10:40 to 10:45
    Setting a cut-off percentage or declaring the auction invalid until 10:55
       
    Additional terms Placement of funds with the possibility of early withdrawal of the entire deposit amount and payment of interest accrued on the deposit amount at the rate established by the deposit transaction, in the event of non-compliance of the Bank with the requirements established by clause 2.1. of the Regulation “On the procedure for selecting banks for placing funds of the Moscow Small Business Lending Assistance Fund in deposits (deposits) under the GDS” (as amended on the date of the deposit transaction), early withdrawal at the “on demand” rate, interest payment monthly, on the last business day of the month, without replenishment

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Israel announces construction of 22 new settlements in occupied West Bank

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: People’s Republic of China in Russian – People’s Republic of China in Russian –

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    JERUSALEM, May 30 (Xinhua) — Israel on Thursday said it would establish 22 new settlements in the occupied West Bank, in what officials called a strategic expansion of Israel’s presence in the Palestinian territory.

    A map published by far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich shows that the plan includes the rebuilding of two settlements, Homesh and Sa-Nur, in the northern part of the territory. They were evacuated in 2005 as part of Israel’s disengagement from the Gaza Strip.

    Meanwhile, Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz confirmed the Security Cabinet’s approval of the plan, calling it a “historic decision” to “strengthen our [Israeli] authority” in the West Bank.

    The announcement came after Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu vowed to take full control of Gaza, while pro-settlement ministers, including B. Smotrich and National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir, advocated moving evacuated Jewish settlements to Gaza.

    Israel captured the West Bank in the 1967 Six-Day War and has been expanding settlements there ever since. More than 720,000 Israeli settlers now live in heavily guarded communities there. –0–

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity

    Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

    The following is issued on behalf of the Hong Kong Monetary Authority:

    The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) released today (May 30) the analytical data on the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region’s foreign currency reserves and foreign currency liquidity as at the end of April 2025 (Annex). These data are published monthly in the Template on International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity in accordance with the International Monetary Fund’s Special Data Dissemination Standard (SDDS).
     
    ****
     
    At present, four press releases relating to the Exchange Fund’s data are issued by the HKMA each month. Three of these releases are issued to disseminate monetary data in accordance with the International Monetary Fund’s SDDS. The fourth press release, on the Exchange Fund’s Abridged Balance Sheet and Currency Board Account, is made in accordance with the HKMA’s policy of maintaining a high level of transparency. For the month of May 2025, the scheduled dates for issuing the press releases are as follows:
     

    May 8
    (Issued)
    SDDS International Reserves
    (Hong Kong’s Latest Foreign Currency Reserve Assets Figures)
    May 14
    (Issued)
    SDDS Analytical Accounts of the Central Bank
     (Analytical Accounts of the Exchange Fund)
    May 30 SDDS Template on International Reserves and
    Foreign Currency Liquidity
    May 30 Exchange Fund Abridged Balance Sheet and
    Currency Board Account

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: SFST meets Canadian officials

    Source: Hong Kong Information Services

    Secretary for Financial Services & the Treasury Christopher Hui met financial officials in Ottawa on Wednesday and business representatives in Vancouver yesterday, as he continued a five-day visit to Canada.

    Mr Hui met Canadian Deputy Minister of Finance Chris Forbes on Wednesday. They discussed the challenges posed by unilateralism and protectionism, and how Hong Kong and Canada might collaborate to achieve mutual benefits in areas such as the gold market and virtual assets.

    Mr Hui told Mr Forbes that as global economic gravity continues to shift eastwards, Hong Kong has been exploring new growth areas and expanding international co-operation. He said this includes efforts by a working group to promote gold market development.

    In a meeting with Canada’s Superintendent of Financial Institutions Peter Routledge, Mr Hui spoke of Hong Kong’s perseverance in upholding a robust regulatory regime across different financial institutions and financial products.

    Mr Routledge praised Hong Kong for its advanced development in the area of digital assets, stating that it sets an example for other regions.

    Mr Hui then met Senator Woo Yuen-pau at Parliament Hill and brief hum on Hong Kong’s effort in maintaining its status as an international financial centre through various measures.

    He mentioned the recent affirmations of Hong Kong’s credit ratings by Fitch, S&P and Moody’s, adding that these fully demonstrate Hong Kong’s resilience in maintaining stability amid increasing global economic and financial uncertainties.

    During his short stay in Ottawa, Mr Hui also paid a courtesy call to China’s Ambassador to Canada Wang Di.

    Mr Wang said Hong Kong has its own distinctive advantages which can enable it to be a bridgehead in driving closer ties between China and Canada in addition to fostering direct co-operation between Hong Kong and Canada.

    In Vancouver yesterday, Mr Hui met Fraser Institute Board Chair Mark Scott and some other prominent business figures to update them on Hong Kong’s financial development.

    Mr Hui welcomed the think-tank’s ranking of Hong Kong as the world’s freest economies in its Economic Freedom of the World 2024 Annual Report.

    Later, he spoke at a business lunch hosted by the Hong Kong-Canada Business Association (Vancouver Chapter), and participated in a fireside chat.

    Mr Hui then met representatives of the Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce and briefed them on development in areas such as wealth management and digital assets in Hong Kong.

    The day concluded with a business networking reception and seminar organised by Invest Hong Kong (Canada).

    Addressing the audience, Mr Hui highlighted the Government’s dedication to integrate Web3 innovations into the real economy by introducing a licensing regime for fiat-referenced stablecoin issuers, and to foster the development of Web3 and digital assets.

    He also mentioned Hong Kong’s determination to expand the financial value chain to sustain the world-class status of its financial markets. Two forward-looking moves are to build an international gold trading market and create a commodity trading ecosystem in Hong Kong, he said.

    Mr Hui added that, with Canada enjoying a prominent position in the global gold market and the Toronto Stock Exchange being the world’s pre-eminent stock exchange for mining companies, co-operation between Hong Kong and Canada can establish an East-West financial corridor for the world.

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News

  • MIL-OSI: Oma Savings Bank Plc – Managers’ transactions – Pykäri

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    OMA SAVINGS BANK PLC, STOCK EXCHANGE RELEASE 21 MAY 2025 AT 15.00. P.M. EET, MANAGERS’ TRANSACTIONS

    Oma Savings Bank Plc – Managers’ transactions – Pykäri
    ____________________________________________

    Person subject to the notification requirement
    Name: Pykäri, Pekka
    Position: Other senior manager
    Issuer: Oma Savings Bank Plc
    LEI: 743700LE1ECAPXC5UT18

    Notification type: INITIAL NOTIFICATION
    Reference number: 743700LE1ECAPXC5UT18_20250527134104_53
    ____________________________________________

    Transaction date: 2025-05-28
    Venue not applicable
    Instrument type: SHARE
    ISIN: FI4000306733
    Nature of the transaction: SUBSCRIPTION

    Transaction details
    (1): Volume: 179 Unit price: 7.5129 EUR

    Aggregated transactions
    (1): Volume: 179 Volume weighted average price: 7.5129 EUR

    Oma Savings Bank Plc

    Additional information:
    Karri Alameri, CEO, tel. +358 45 656 5250, karri.alameri@omasp.fi

    DISTRIBUTION: 
    Nasdaq Helsinki Ltd
    Major media
    www.omasp.fi

    OmaSp is a solvent and profitable Finnish bank. About 600 professionals provide nationwide services through OmaSp’s 48 branch offices and digital service channels to over 200,000 private and corporate customers. OmaSp focuses primarily on retail banking operations and provides its clients with a broad range of banking services both through its own balance sheet as well as by acting as an intermediary for its partners’ products. The intermediated products include credit, investment and loan insurance products. OmaSp is also engaged in mortgage banking operations.

    OmaSp core idea is to provide personal service and to be local and close to its customers, both in digital and traditional channels. OmaSp strives to offer premium level customer experience through personal service and easy accessibility. In addition, the development of the operations and services is customer-oriented. The personnel is committed and OmaSp seeks to support their career development with versatile tasks and continuous development. A substantial part of the personnel also own shares in OmaSp.

    The MIL Network

  • India to be fastest-growing economy for next 30 years: Piyush Goyal

    Source: Government of India

    Source: Government of India (4)

    India is poised to remain the fastest-growing large economy for the next three decades, with a sustained annual growth rate of 6–7%, Union Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal said on Thursday.

    Speaking at the Confederation of Indian Industry (CII) Annual Business Summit 2025, Goyal said the government is aiming to push growth to 8% at constant prices.

    “Even amidst international upheavals, we are among the better-performing emerging markets,” he said. “Today, India holds the world’s fourth-largest foreign exchange reserves in the world at about $690 billion. Our inflation has remained below 4% for the last three months. The Reserve Bank has done a commendable job balancing liquidity and currency management.”

    Goyal emphasized that India remains an attractive investment destination. Over the past two decades, Indian companies have delivered nearly 20% CAGR returns, he noted, adding that Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) inflows continue to break records. “We are back on track on the growth trajectory, working through international trading relations,” he said.

    On trade agreements, Goyal pointed to major progress on Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) with the UAE, Australia, the UK, and the four EFTA countries (Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway, and Switzerland). “We are well on track with our bilateral trade agreement with the USA and making fast progress with the European Union’s 27-nation bloc. We have also launched negotiations with New Zealand,” he said.

    Goyal said the EFTA countries have committed $100 billion in FDI over the next 15 years, potentially catalyzing a total investment of $500 billion. “This ecosystem could attract an additional $500 billion,” he added. The investment clause in the EFTA deal is the first of its kind globally, and the figures exclude contributions from Norway’s sovereign wealth fund.

    Despite global volatility, Goyal said India continues to be a pillar of global growth. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has projected that India will become the world’s third-largest economy by GDP by 2027.

    Highlighting government’s sustained push for ease of doing business, the Goyal said that over 40,000 compliances have been reduced, several laws have been decriminalised, and nearly 2,000 obsolete laws have been removed from the statute book. He noted that the Jan Vishwas Bill reflects the trust between the government and people.

    “The Act promotes self-certification, encourages businesses to offer suggestions to improve ease of doing business, and simplifies people’s lives. It reflects a government that trusts its stakeholders,” he said.

    On the sustainability front, he pointed out that renewable energy coupled with storage is now available at ₹3.30 per kilowatt hour—among the lowest globally. “Solar and wind plus storage make a compelling case for data centres to come to India. We have a large interconnected grid with low-cost clean energy to power these centres. This is not just about sustainability – it is an economic case,” he said.

    Reaffirming Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s vision for inclusive development, Goyal said the government is working to ensure that every citizen has access to quality healthcare, education, and basic needs. “Free healthcare, quality education and basic needs are being addressed. We are now seeing employment growth, and skill development centres are playing a key role. No child should be deprived, and no man should be left behind,” he said.

  • MIL-OSI Banking: Result of the Daily Variable Rate Repo (VRR) auction held on May 30, 2025

    Source: Reserve Bank of India

    Tenor 3-day
    Notified Amount (in ₹ crore) 25,000
    Total amount of bids received (in ₹ crore) 8,721
    Amount allotted (in ₹ crore) 8,721
    Cut off Rate (%) 6.01
    Weighted Average Rate (%) 6.01
    Partial Allotment Percentage of bids received at cut off rate (%) NA

    Ajit Prasad          
    Deputy General Manager
    (Communications)   

    Press Release: 2025-2026/435

    MIL OSI Global Banks

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: Mediation body established in HK

    Source: Hong Kong Information Services

    Chief Executive John Lee

    I am delighted to join you on this historic occasion: to celebrate with you the signing of the Convention on the Establishment of the International Organization for Mediation (IOMed).

    Gathered here today, in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China, are high-level representatives of over 80 countries from Asia, Africa, Latin America and Europe; and from the United Nations and about 20 international organisations. A very warm welcome to Hong Kong!

    It is a privilege for us to host this signing ceremony, and to serve as the IOMed headquarters, once the convention enters into force.

    This singular occasion is made possible by the ongoing and dedicated efforts of China, our country, in working with around 20 states, since late 2022, to establish an intergovernmental organisation devoted to mediation. After five rounds of intensive negotiation since 2023, co-ordinated by the IOMed Preparatory Office, the negotiating states concluded the very convention signed today.

    The IOMed will become the world’s first intergovernmental international legal organisation dedicated to resolving international disputes through mediation. It also reflects our shared confidence in mediation as a peaceful means to maintain international peace and security, as stipulated in the Charter of the United Nations.

    The IOMed will provide a pathway for countries – regardless of culture, language and legal system – to resolve international disputes based on mutual respect and understanding. This is increasingly important amid mounting geopolitical tensions. When protectionism threatens to derail the international trade order, and when unilateralism looms over global supply chains, it is dialogue – not division – that restores balance.

    China has long championed equity and unity. The Chinese virtue of “和而不同”, meaning “harmony in diversity”, is deeply rooted in our community and culture. This value of mutual respect in spite of differences also sits at the heart of mediation, the IOMed, and a world that seeks co-operation over conflict.

    Despite geopolitical turbulence, Hong Kong builds bridges, not walls. Under our unique “one country, two systems” principle, Hong Kong is the only world city that enjoys both the China advantage and the global advantage. With the support of the National 14th Five-Year Plan, Hong Kong has risen as an international legal and dispute resolution services centre in the Asia-Pacific region.

    We are the only common law jurisdiction in China, and the only jurisdiction in the world with a bilingual common law system in both Chinese and English. We have a long tradition of the rule of law, and our courts exercise their judicial power independently. Hong Kong’s Court of Final Appeal, which is vested with the power of final adjudication, has on its bench eminent jurists from both Hong Kong and overseas common law jurisdictions.

    Our robust, efficient and well-respected legal system is supported by world-class legal and dispute resolution professionals. Often bilingual or even multilingual, they are well-versed in international rules and practices, and help to position Hong Kong as a preferred venue for dispute resolution.

    In this year’s International Arbitration Survey, Hong Kong is the most preferred seat of arbitration in the Asia-Pacific region, and shares second place globally with another jurisdiction. Our economy also came first in business legislation and international trade in the World Competitiveness Yearbook. In the latest Business Ready Report published by the World Bank Group, Hong Kong ranks eighth in dispute resolution among the 50 economies covered.

    All this underscores Hong Kong’s effectiveness as a super connector and super value-adder among many economies. We contribute to cross-border investment and economic activity through our top-notch professional services. Our “one country, two systems” advantages make us well-placed to be the headquarters of the important institution of the IOMed.

    The Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Government is devoted to supporting the IOMed’s provision of friendly, flexible, economical and efficient mediation services. We actively promote a vibrant culture of mediation. In fact, it is a general policy to incorporate a mediation clause in all government contracts. We are also enhancing the system on local accreditation and disciplinary matters of the mediation profession.

    And we go all out to build bridges with the world. Hong Kong will actively promote the IOMed’s valuable work in settling international disputes through mediation, and advocate mediation as a global tool for peace and justice across borders.

    Ladies and gentlemen, the establishment of the IOMed’s headquarters in Hong Kong is a great honour for our city. The headquarters, as you may know, will be based in the building that once housed the Wan Chai Police Station, just a stone’s throw away from here. Built in 1932, this iconic building has a long association with law and order in Hong Kong. From its prime downtown location, it has also witnessed the transformation of our city that has long treasured unity. In its new role as the IOMed headquarters, the building will play a vital part in the future of Hong Kong as a centre for international legal and dispute resolution services.

    We are working to complete the conversion of the building for its new mission. I am happy to say that it could open its doors as early as the end of this year. We look forward not only to welcoming its new occupants, but also to supporting them in building new bridges for a more connected, peaceful and prosperous future through mediation.

    I would like to express my sincere gratitude to the central government for its staunch support of Hong Kong, allowing Hong Kong the honour of housing the IOMed headquarters here. My sincere gratitude also goes to the international community, for placing your trust and confidence in our city. Let’s renew our commitment to peace, justice and the rule of law. Let’s cultivate a mediation culture together. Let’s build a strong IOMed for a global community of shared future founded on peace and prosperity. Please enjoy the day and enjoy Hong Kong. Thank you.

    Chief Executive John Lee gave this speech at the Signing Ceremony of the Convention on the Establishment of the International Organization for Mediation on May 30.

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News

  • Indian stock market opens flat amid stable institutional investments

    Source: Government of India

    Source: Government of India (4)

    Indian benchmark indices opened on a flat note on Friday, tracking weak cues from Asian markets and early pressure in IT and auto stocks. Analysts suggest the market is likely to remain in a consolidation phase in the near term due to the absence of strong positive triggers.

    At 9:29 a.m., the Sensex was marginally up by 11.77 points at 81,644.79, while the Nifty gained 13.20 points to trade at 24,846.80.

    The Nifty Bank index rose by 81.20 points (0.15%) to 55,627.25, and the Nifty Midcap 100 climbed 0.44% to 57,707.65. The Nifty Smallcap 100 also edged higher by 0.21% to 17,927.15.

    Despite subdued trade in early hours, analysts noted a positive technical signal from Thursday’s session, where the Nifty staged a smart rebound towards the end. Akshay Chinchalkar, Head of Research at Axis Securities, said, “Yesterday’s recovery showed a bullish lower shadow and small real body close to the day’s high, suggesting potential upward momentum.” He identified 24,677 and 25,000 as immediate support and resistance levels, respectively.

    In the Sensex pack, top losers included Infosys, Tech Mahindra, HCL Tech, Bajaj Finance, IndusInd Bank, Bharti Airtel, Titan, and Hindustan Unilever. On the gaining side were Adani Ports, Eicher Motors, Maruti Suzuki, and Sun Pharma.

    Weakness persisted across Asian markets, with indices in Hong Kong, Bangkok, Seoul, China, and Japan trading in the red.

    Meanwhile, US markets closed higher in the previous session. The Dow Jones added 117.03 points to settle at 42,215.73, the S&P 500 rose by 23.62 points to 5,912.17, and the Nasdaq gained 74.93 points to close at 19,175.87.

    Dr. V.K. Vijayakumar, Chief Investment Strategist at Geojit Financial Services, highlighted a key reason for the market’s range-bound nature. “India’s macroeconomic fundamentals are strong and improving, but this is not yet being reflected in corporate earnings,” he said.

    On the institutional front, FIIs were net buyers, purchasing equities worth ₹884.03 crore on May 29. DIIs were also strong buyers, investing ₹4,286.50 crore.

    -IANS

  • MIL-OSI China: Announcement on Open Market Operations No.102 [2025]

    Source: Peoples Bank of China

    Announcement on Open Market Operations No.102 [2025]

    (Open Market Operations Office, May 30, 2025)

    The People’s Bank of China conducted reverse repo operations in the amount of RMB291.1 billion through quantity bidding at a fixed interest rate on May 30, 2025.

    Details of the Reverse Repo Operations

    Maturity

    Rate

    Bidding Volume

    Winning Bid Volume

    7 days

    1.40%

    RMB291.1 billion

    RMB291.1 billion

    Date of last update Nov. 29 2018

    2025年05月30日

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI Banking: Money Market Operations as on May 29, 2025

    Source: Reserve Bank of India


    (Amount in ₹ crore, Rate in Per cent)

      Volume
    (One Leg)
    Weighted
    Average Rate
    Range
    A. Overnight Segment (I+II+III+IV) 5,77,073.30 5.71 2.00-6.80
         I. Call Money 15,981.90 5.78 4.85-5.82
         II. Triparty Repo 3,88,926.60 5.72 5.66-5.80
         III. Market Repo 1,71,005.60 5.69 2.00-6.80
         IV. Repo in Corporate Bond 1,159.20 5.91 5.90-6.00
    B. Term Segment      
         I. Notice Money** 70.00 5.67 5.45-5.85
         II. Term Money@@ 405.00 6.05-6.15
         III. Triparty Repo 4,265.00 5.84 5.80-5.90
         IV. Market Repo 0.00
         V. Repo in Corporate Bond 0.00
      Auction Date Tenor (Days) Maturity Date Amount Current Rate /
    Cut off Rate
    C. Liquidity Adjustment Facility (LAF), Marginal Standing Facility (MSF) & Standing Deposit Facility (SDF)
    I. Today’s Operations
    1. Fixed Rate          
    2. Variable Rate&          
      (I) Main Operation          
         (a) Repo          
         (b) Reverse Repo          
      (II) Fine Tuning Operations          
         (a) Repo Thu, 29/05/2025 1 Fri, 30/05/2025 3,335.00 6.01
         (b) Reverse Repo          
      (III) Long Term Operations^          
         (a) Repo          
         (b) Reverse Repo          
    3. MSF# Thu, 29/05/2025 1 Fri, 30/05/2025 1,062.00 6.25
    4. SDFΔ# Thu, 29/05/2025 1 Fri, 30/05/2025 2,18,709.00 5.75
    5. Net liquidity injected from today’s operations [injection (+)/absorption (-)]*       -2,14,312.00  
    II. Outstanding Operations
    1. Fixed Rate          
    2. Variable Rate&          
      (I) Main Operation          
         (a) Repo          
         (b) Reverse Repo          
      (II) Fine Tuning Operations          
         (a) Repo          
         (b) Reverse Repo          
      (III) Long Term Operations^          
         (a) Repo Thu, 17/04/2025 43 Fri, 30/05/2025 25,731.00 6.01
         (b) Reverse Repo          
    3. MSF#          
    4. SDFΔ#          
    D. Standing Liquidity Facility (SLF) Availed from RBI$       8,594.62  
    E. Net liquidity injected from outstanding operations [injection (+)/absorption (-)]*     34,325.62  
    F. Net liquidity injected (outstanding including today’s operations) [injection (+)/absorption (-)]*     -1,79,986.38  
    G. Cash Reserves Position of Scheduled Commercial Banks
         (i) Cash balances with RBI as on May 29, 2025 9,51,404.27  
         (ii) Average daily cash reserve requirement for the fortnight ending May 30, 2025 9,48,817.00  
    H. Government of India Surplus Cash Balance Reckoned for Auction as on¥ May 29, 2025 3,335.00  
    I. Net durable liquidity [surplus (+)/deficit (-)] as on May 02, 2025 2,34,873.00  
    @ Based on Reserve Bank of India (RBI) / Clearing Corporation of India Limited (CCIL).
    – Not Applicable / No Transaction.
    ** Relates to uncollateralized transactions of 2 to 14 days tenor.
    @@ Relates to uncollateralized transactions of 15 days to one year tenor.
    $ Includes refinance facilities extended by RBI.
    & As per the Press Release No. 2019-2020/1900 dated February 06, 2020.
    Δ As per the Press Release No. 2022-2023/41 dated April 08, 2022.
    * Net liquidity is calculated as Repo+MSF+SLF-Reverse Repo-SDF.
    ¥ As per the Press Release No. 2014-2015/1971 dated March 19, 2015.
    # As per the Press Release No. 2023-2024/1548 dated December 27, 2023.
    ^ As per the Press Release No. 2025-2026/91 dated April 11, 2025.
    Ajit Prasad          
    Deputy General Manager
    (Communications)    
    Press Release: 2025-2026/433

    MIL OSI Global Banks

  • MIL-OSI Banking: Speech: Meg O’Neill Address to the 2025 Australian Energy Producers Conference & Exhibition – Australian Energy Producers

    Source: Australian Petroleum Production & Exploration Association

    Headline: Speech: Meg O’Neill Address to the 2025 Australian Energy Producers Conference & Exhibition – Australian Energy Producers

    Thank you, Samantha, for that kind introduction.

    Welcome everyone to the 2025 Australian Energy Producers Conference!

    I’d like to begin by acknowledging the Jagera and Turrbal people as the traditional custodians of the land upon which we are meeting today.

    Thank you also to Shannon Ruska for that wonderful Welcome to Country.

    It was a fantastic way to open our conference and mark the start of National Reconciliation Week.

    Looking around at this room, it is great to see such strong support for our industry.

    Thank you to each and every one of you for the effort you have made to be here.

    It’s really valuable for us to come together and share knowledge and debate ideas, with the aim of constantly improving how we work, and how we can chart a brighter future for our industry and the nation in the years to come.

    We’ve already had some thoughtful speeches this morning.

    Thank you Sam for your dedication to promoting the great work of our members.

    And Minister King, thank you for your reflections and your strong advocacy for our industry.

    We look forward to continuing to work with you.

    I would also like to acknowledge that Senator Anthony Chisholm, Assistant Minister for Resources is here.

    Senator Chisolm, thank you for your attendance.

    Later this morning we’ll hear from former Australian Treasurer and Ambassador to the United States Joe Hockey and the Queensland Treasurer and Minister for Energy David Janetzki.

    I am very much looking forward to hearing their perspectives on the economic and energy challenges facing Australia, and nations around the world.

    I would like to take this opportunity to congratulate the Albanese Government on its election victory.

    Campaigning for office is not for the faint of heart. It takes passion, discipline and a belief in the idea that Australia can be better. I admire the commitment and endurance of those who run in modern-day elections.

    One vital pathway to building a brighter future for Australia is to ensure that we and our regional partners have the energy we need to build prosperity and succeed in the energy transition.

    So, I would also like to thank the Government for its clear acknowledgement of the critical role that gas plays in the Australian economy and in the nation’s trading relationships.

    The vital importance of gas has also been emphasised by the Liberals and Nationals, and we appreciate this bipartisan support.

    The Government’s Future Gas Strategy, led by Minister King, makes a powerful and compelling case for the role of gas in supporting the quality of life in Australia, and in providing energy security in our region.

    We thank the Minister for her leadership and vision in laying out this roadmap for Australia’s gas endowment.

    The opportunity now is to take real actions that deliver the Government’s Future Gas Strategy.

    And Minister King, you have our industry’s support in working together with all stakeholders to achieve this for the long-term.

    Celebration of the year’s success

    One of my favourite things about this conference is the chance to celebrate our industry’s success in helping meet Australia’s energy needs, and in delivering strong economic outcomes at local, state and national levels.

    I think it’s fitting we are here in Brisbane, because this year marks 10 years since the Queensland LNG industry began operating.

    It’s hard to imagine the Australian industry without our Queensland operators and I think we should celebrate this achievement with a round of applause.

    From the vast offshore fields of Western Australia, the Northern Territory and Victoria – to the rich onshore basins of Queensland, South Australia and New South Wales – and to the emerging basins such as the Perth Basin and the Beetaloo – Australia’s oil and gas industry stands as a powerhouse of innovation and economic strength.

    By exploring, developing and producing these resources, we play a critical role in providing the energy needed in Australia and the Asian region.

    But we cannot take this for granted.

    Reflection on Australia’s energy edge

    For decades, Australia’s vast energy resources have provided a major competitive advantage for the nation’s economy.

    In particular, safe, affordable and reliable domestic gas has helped underpin the success of many Australian businesses, especially in mining and manufacturing.

    While the LNG industry has made a significant contribution to Australia’s prosperity through taxes and royalties, skilled jobs, community support and economic development.

    KPMG analysis commissioned by AEP found the gas industry contributed 105 billion dollars to Australia’s gross domestic product and supported 215,000 ongoing jobs across the economy in 2021-22.

    This is in addition to taxes and royalties paid to Australian governments, which in 2023‑24 totalled an estimated 17.1 billion dollars.

    But our energy edge is at risk.

    This is evidenced by forecasts of looming supply shortfalls on both the east and west coasts and weakened investor confidence in investing in new supply.

    AEP has this week released a Wood Mackenzie report that analysed Australia as an investment destination.

    The study involved data analysis and a survey of CEOs of AEP member companies.

    It makes for sobering reading, confirming what many in this room already know.

    Certainty around Australia’s energy and climate policies, environmental regulation and timely approvals is critical to driving investment.

    95 per cent of respondents said they have had investments directly impacted by a change in government policy or regulation.

    Of these investments, a fifth did not proceed or were relocated outside of Australia, and almost half were significantly delayed.

    Learning from experiences in prior years, we have an opportunity now to create the foundations for the next wave of energy investment in Australia.

    We must continue to make the most of our natural resources and our ingenuity, so that we keep jobs and revenue in Australia.

    Implications

    What is also at stake is the nation’s ability to compete on the global stage for the industries of the future.

    These include artificial intelligence, data centres, critical minerals manufacturing and no doubt sectors we haven’t even imagined yet. All of which depend on reliable and affordable power.

    The recent blackouts in Spain and Portugal are a forceful reminder of the consequences of losing reliable supplies of energy, upon which we rely for our daily lives and jobs.

    While the causes of the blackouts are still being investigated, what we can see with certainty is that these events reinforce the need to focus on energy security and energy affordability, as well as – and not instead of – emissions reduction.

    All three matter.

    When we lose sight of any one of these, all three are at risk.

    I am encouraged by evidence – including the Government’s Future Gas Strategy – that policymakers are increasingly willing to recognise and speak up for the critical importance of natural gas, including as the stabilising partner to higher levels of renewables and as a lower emissions source of power than coal.

    I welcome more government policy decisions to reflect the strategy in practice.

    And I think it is time that the opponents of our industry face up to the fact that they are making the energy transition harder and more risky by slowing down investment and trying to take practical options off the table.

    If Australia loses its energy edge, we also lose opportunities to contribute to decarbonisation at home and abroad.

    As we know, when used to generate electricity, gas typically produces half the life cycle emissions of coal.

    Coal demand in the Asia Pacific continues to grow and drive up global emissions.

    This underlines why Australia must maximise opportunities to supply LNG to Asian customers who want to reduce their reliance on coal through a combination of gas and renewables.

    Furthermore, the opportunity to service growing demand for natural gas is one that Australia’s competitor nations will seize, if Australia is not able to take the opportunities before it.

    For example – we have seen significant pro-energy investment policy changes in the USA with the change in administration, and I am eager to hear Joe Hockey’s take on this.

    But no one doubts where the US stands on developing its natural resources – the President has declared an Energy Emergency, and prioritised development of the US’s energy resources – both for domestic use and for customers abroad.

    And there is genuine urgency to tackle permitting reform and make energy investment easier.

    Our offer and our ask

    All of us in this room recognise the enormous opportunity that Australia has to help meet essential energy needs – and the necessity of doing so responsibly.

    Australian Energy Producers’ message to policymakers here in Australia, is that we will play our part in supplying affordable, reliable energy to customers, while also tackling climate change.

    We are committed to doing this through innovation and collaboration.

    We are designing and operating out emissions from our assets, implementing CCS, and diversifying into new lower-carbon commodities and technologies.

    As a proof point – Australia now has two of the world’s largest CCS projects, with the Gorgon project having sequestered over 11 million tons of CO2 since it commenced operations, and the Moomba CCS project starting up last year.

    Something else we’re committed to is ensuring the public discussion about energy policy includes balance and facts.

    Through AEP’s advocacy, we are calling out misinformation and disinformation campaigns that seek to downplay our sector’s significant economic and tax contribution, and the essential role of gas in achieving decarbonisation goals.

    We appreciate government efforts to help build community understanding of the role of gas and foster support for what we deliver.

    It’s vital that people hear the facts about gas and understand its importance to their lives, the Australian economy and decarbonising Asia.

    By equipping people with knowledge about energy production, consumption and role in the energy transition, we make it harder for our opponents to spread misinformation, and easier to have the respectful policy debates that can lead to better industry and environmental outcomes.

    With a new federal parliament elected, it is an opportunity to finally cut red and green tape, to simplify and streamline Australia’s approvals system.

    Cutting red and green tape will promote innovation, and enable businesses to thrive.

    And it will create more jobs for Australians.

    Streamlining approvals will also drive the productivity growth Australia needs to remain competitive in an increasingly protectionist world.

    And in news hot off the press, it was a huge relief last week to see the Native Title Tribunal clear a path for Santos’s much-needed Narrabri gas development to go ahead.

    As an industry, we look forward to working with new Environment Minister Murray Watt as he takes on the critical role of ensuring energy development in Australia is conducted responsibly and sustainably.

    We acknowledge that Minister Watt is working through the process to take a decision on the North West Shelf extension and we look forward to an outcome.

    We all recognise that energy development must meet rigorous environmental standards and maintain the confidence of the community.

    The Government’s Future Gas Strategy is a clear roadmap for policy reform to ensure that these objectives are met as the nation’s resources are responsibly developed.

    This includes implementing clear and unambiguous offshore consultation rules.

    Regulatory loopholes are in no-one’s interests.

    The industry fully supports consulting with impacted traditional owners and other stakeholders – but the rules for consultation must be clear to provide predictable outcomes for all parties.

    It is also essential that exploration resume in earnest in Australia.

    This starts with regular offshore acreage licensing rounds, and clear regulations around the well-proven and safe technology of seismic surveys.

    We must get exploration going now to ensure the energy future of the 2030’s and 2040’s is secure.

    Conclusion

    In closing, Australia has the key ingredients to sustain its energy edge for decades to come.

    We have been gifted natural resource potential like few other nations.

    We have the talented, capable and motivated workforce we need to unlock the potential.

    We have a long track record of supporting downstream domestic industries and providing feedstock and energy to build Australia’s prosperity.

    We also have proximity to the world’s fastest growing energy markets, who are looking for secure, reliable supplies to power their own development.

    We have the opportunity now to build on the decades of success – unlocking new resources, powering a bright future, and doing so responsibly.

    There will be headwinds, but we have the resilience and the vision as an industry to ensure that Australia’s energy edge delivers for every Australian, for decades to come.

    Thank you everyone, I wish you a great conference.

    MIL OSI Global Banks

  • MIL-OSI Russia: To the participants and guests of the VII Congress of the Association of Russian Banks

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: Government of the Russian Federation – An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.

    Dear friends!

    I welcome you to the VII Congress of the Association of Russian Banks.

    On this discussion platform, the professional community conducts constructive dialogue, discusses current issues, and exchanges best practices.

    For 35 years, your public organization has united financiers, representatives of scientific and business circles, government bodies, experts and analysts.

    Over the years, the Association has gained extensive experience and made a significant contribution to the development of the national banking system. It has done a lot to support small and medium businesses, strengthen the trust of investors and our citizens in credit institutions.

    It is important that you take an active part in improving legislation, forming the regulatory framework. You pay special attention to the implementation of domestic digital technologies, as well as increasing the level of cybersecurity.

    I hope that the congress delegates will formulate specific proposals that will facilitate the implementation of promising projects aimed at strengthening Russia’s financial sovereignty.

    I wish you fruitful work, meaningful discussions, new successes and achievements.

    M. Mishustin

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Financial news: Bank of Russia changes approaches to planning inspections for market participants

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: Central Bank of Russia –

    The regulator plans to cancel the three-year periodicity of inspections of supervised organizations for which it was established. These are credit organizations, non-state pension funds, large insurers and professional participants in the securities market, payment system operators, credit history bureaus, trade organizers and others.

    Project changes The instructions on the inspection procedure are published on the Bank of Russia website.

    Inspections of financial market participants will be conducted based on supervisory needs and assessment of information about their activities. Thus, the Bank of Russia will completely switch to a risk-oriented model of inspection planning.

    These changes will reduce the administrative burden on bona fide and transparent market participants.

    Preview photo: TippaPatt / Shutterstock / Fotodom

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    Please Note; This Information is Raw Content Directly from the Information Source. It is access to What the Source Is Stating and Does Not Reflect

    HTTPS: //vv. KBR.ru/Press/Event/? ID = 24656

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Financial news: 05/29/2025 deposit auction will be held Moscow Regional Guarantee Fund (3)

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: Moscow Exchange – Moscow Exchange –

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    Please Note; This Information is Raw Content Directly from the Information Source. It is access to What the Source Is Stating and Does Not Reflect

    HTTPS: //VVV. MEEX.K.M.M.

    Categories24-7, Mil-SOSI, Moscow, Moscow Stock Exchange, Russian Economy, Russian Federal, Russian Language, Russian economy

    Post Navigation


    Archives

    Archives

    Privacy Policy Proudly Powered by WordPress

    Parameters
    Date of the deposit auction 05/29/2025
    Placement currency Rub
    Maximum amount of funds placed (in placement currency) 3 200 000 000.00
    Placement period, days 89
    Date of deposit 05/30/2025
    Refund date 08/27/2025
    Minimum placement interest rate, % per annum 20.50
    Conditions of imprisonment, urgent or special Urgent
    Minimum amount of funds placed for one application (in placement currency) 100,000,000.00
    Maximum number of applications from one Participant, pcs. 1
    Auction form, open or closed Open
    Basis of the Treaty General Agreement
     
    Schedule (Moscow time)
    Preliminary applications from 16:30 to 16:45
    Applications in competition mode from 16:45 to 16:55
    Setting a cut-off percentage or declaring the auction invalid until 17:20
       
    Additional terms Interest payment at the end of the term

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Reed, Warren, Wyden Urge Investigation to Determine if DOGE Employees’ Committed Criminal Violations of Federal Ethics Laws

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Rhode Island Jack Reed

    WASHINGTON, DC — U.S. Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), Jack Reed (D-RI), and Ron Wyden (D-OR) sent a letter to the Department of Justice (DOJ), Office of Government Ethics (OGE), and Inspector Generals at the Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service (IRS), and Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) urging their offices to investigate whether Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) employees broke the law by working to dismantle government agencies while holding hundreds of thousands of dollars in private companies. The lawmakers are Ranking Members of the Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee; Senate Armed Services Committee; and Senate Finance Committee, respectively. 

    “These DOGE employees’ conflicts of interest and role in the mass firings at CFPB, Treasury, and IRS undermine the integrity of their decision-making and the actions taken by the agencies where they work,” the three senators wrote.

    Recent reporting by Politico revealed that Tom Krause, the leader of the Treasury’s DOGE team, has financial holdings worth hundreds of thousands of dollars in companies like JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, PNC, U.S. Bank, Wells Fargo, Deutsche Bank, Morgan Stanley, and Santander—all companies that have business before Treasury or provide services to the Department. Krause has also been responsible for leading Treasury’s efforts to modernize the Treasury’s IT and financial infrastructure while owning shares of big tech companies like Google, Oracle, and Amazon. 

    Krause and two other Treasury employees, Todd Newnam and Linda Whitridge, also own shares of Intuit, the parent company of TurboTax, which for years has attempted to sabotage the IRS Direct File program. Direct File allows taxpayers to file their taxes for free and directly with the IRS instead of using private sector programs like TurboTax. In recent months, DOGE fired the program’s development team and the Trump administration has reportedly decided to end the program. 

    “It would be deeply disturbing if DOGE employees with a financial stake in Intuit were involved with overseeing and dismantling the Direct File initiative, which would directly benefit Intuit and these employees’ financial holdings,” the lawmakers wrote. 

    ProPublica also recently reported that Gavin Kliger, a DOGE aid at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), was warned by ethics officials that he held stock in companies that “employees are forbidden from owning.” These holdings include as much as $715,000 of investments in barred companies such as Apple Inc., Tesla Inc., Alphabet Inc., and two cryptocurrencies, all companies subject to investigation by the CFPB. Three days later, despite ethics officials’ warnings, Kliger participated in layoffs at the agency, including firing the ethics lawyers that warned him of his conflicts. 

    At least one expert has described Mr. Kliger’s actions as “look[ing] like a pretty clear-cut violation’” of the federal criminal conflict-of-interest statute, which could carry a fine of up to $250,000 and up to five years in prison. 

    “Together, these three examples underscore what appears to be a pervasive problem with Elon Musk and DOGE employees trampling ethics rules and laws to benefit their own pockets at the expense of the American public,” wrote the senators. 

    The senators called on the DOJ, OGE, and Inspectors Generals of the Treasury, Office for Tax Administration, and the Federal Reserve to investigate the legality of these employees’ conflicts and whether they have violated federal ethics laws. 

    “Neither Mr. Musk nor those working on his behalf in DOGE are above the law, and if they have failed to follow it, the Department of Justice (DOJ) and other relevant government officials should act to hold them accountable,” the senators concluded.

    Full text of the letter follows:

    Dear Attorney General Bondi, Acting Director Greer, Ms. Sciurba, Ms. Hill, and Mr. Gibson:

    We write regarding new reports that DOGE employees at the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service (IRS), and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) have been engaged in the dismantling of these agencies while holding hundreds of thousands of dollars of stock in private companies benefitting from these individuals’ efforts to eliminate key programs, staff, and policies. This poses a clear conflict of interest and potential criminal violation of federal ethics law, which bars any Federal government employee from “participat[ing] personally and substantially…[in any] particular matter in which [they] … ha[ve] a financial interest.” A willful violation of the law would subject these individuals to a fine of up to $250,000 and up to five years in prison. We request that your offices investigate this matter.

    Neither Mr. Musk nor those working on his behalf with DOGE are above the law, and if they have failed to follow it, the Department of Justice (DOJ) and other relevant government officials should hold them accountable.

    First, earlier this month, reporting revealed that Tom Krause, the leader of Treasury’s DOGE team and top official overseeing Treasury’s Bureau of the Fiscal Service, has financial holdings worth hundreds of thousands of dollars in companies that have business before Treasury or provide services to the Department. Some of Mr. Krause’s holdings—including hundreds of thousands of dollars’ worth of shares of JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, PNC, U.S. Bank, Wells Fargo, Deutsche Bank, Morgan Stanley, and Santander—are in financial institutions that provide financial services to and purchase U.S. debt securities directly from Treasury. In addition, Mr. Krause has also been responsible for leading Treasury’s efforts to “modernize its IT and financial infrastructure,” despite owning shares of big tech firms like Google, Oracle, and Amazon. Experts have described this as “a massive, glaring red flag of a conflict of interest.”

    Second, the same report also indicated that Mr. Krause and two other Treasury DOGE team members—Todd Newnam and Linda Whitridge—own shares of Intuit, the parent company of TurboTax, which has been engaged in a years’ long attempt to sabotage the IRS’ free tax filing program, “Direct File.” This easy-to-use program allows taxpayers to file their taxes for free and directly with the IRS, rather than use private sector tax preparation software like TurboTax. Troublingly, the program has been targeted for elimination by DOGE: months after Musk posted that DOGE had “deleted” a team that contributed to Direct File’s development, reports surfaced that the Trump Administration had decided to end the program. It would be deeply disturbing if DOGE employees with a financial stake in Intuit were involved with overseeing and dismantling the Direct File initiative, which would directly benefit Intuit and these employees’ financial holdings.

    Third, last month, ProPublica reported that Gavin Kliger, a DOGE aide at the CFPB, was warned by ethics attorneys “that he held stock in companies that employees are forbidden from owning — and was advised not to participate in any actions that could benefit him personally.” These holdings include as much as $715,000 of investments in barred companies such as Apple Inc., Tesla Inc., Alphabet Inc., and two cryptocurrencies. These companies are on the CFPB’s “Prohibited Holding” list since they are “subject to examination by the Bureau.”

    Three days later, Mr. Kliger “participated in mass layoffs at the agency anyway, including the firings of the ethics lawyers that warned him” of his conflicts. The conflicts are obvious: “a defanged and downsized consumer watchdog is unlikely to aggressively regulate those and other companies, freeing them of compliance costs and the risk associated with examinations and enforcement actions. That in turn could boost their stock prices and benefit … Kliger.” At least one expert has described Mr. Kliger’s actions as “look[ing] like a pretty clear-cut violation’” of the federal criminal conflict-of-interest statute

    Together, these three examples underscore what appears to be a pervasive problem with Elon Musk and DOGE employees trampling ethics rules and laws to benefit their own pockets at the expense of the American public. These DOGE employees’ conflicts of interest and role in the mass firings at CFPB, Treasury, and IRS undermine the integrity of their decision-making and the actions taken by the agencies where they work.

    To be clear, there continues to be uncertainty about the specific circumstances surrounding these individuals’ conflicts, including whether they may have divested from some or all of their conflicted holdings, whether their actions may have constituted involvement in “particular matters” that will have a “direct and predictable effect” on their financial interests, or whether they may have received waivers from relevant Designated Agency Ethics Officials or White House officials. But the American people deserve answers regarding whether their own interests may have been undermined by Trump Administration officials that acted in violation of federal ethics laws.

    Given these open questions, we ask that your offices investigate this matter. The Treasury Inspector General (Treasury IG), Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA), and Inspector General of the Federal Reserve (Fed IG) should conduct a broad review of whether these and other DOGE representatives may have engaged in illegal or inappropriate efforts at the Treasury, IRS, and CFPB. The Department of Justice (DOJ) should investigate whether these and other DOGE representatives may have violated federal ethics law by abusing their official roles for the benefit of private companies in which they have a vested financial interest. We also ask that the Office of Government Ethics examine this matter and recommend any potential violations for appropriate enforcement action.

    Thank you for your attention to this important matter.

    Sincerely,

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Larsen Requests Nearly $37 Million for 15 Local Projects in Fiscal Year 2026 Spending Bill

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Rick Larsen (2nd Congressional District Washington)

    WASHINGTON, D.C.  – Rep. Rick Larsen (WA-02) has requested $36,773,695 for 15 local projects in the Fiscal Year 2026 spending bill. Larsen submitted the requests to the House Appropriations Committee as the Committee begins work on legislation to fund the federal government.

    “My priority in shaping spending bills is to invest in Northwest Washington communities,” said Larsen. “I will continue to work closely with community leaders and stakeholders to secure critical funding to create more jobs, build better infrastructure and improve vital services residents rely on.”

    The spending bill will include earmark funding for community projects that local leaders and stakeholders identified as critical to their communities. Larsen secured more than $19.3 million for 15 Northwest Washington projects in the Fiscal Year 2024 spending package, which was signed into law in March 2024.

    Northwest Washington Community Project Funding Requests

    Larsen requested the following earmarks to invest in Northwest Washington communities:

    Investing in a Cleaner, Greener, Safer and More Accessible Transportation System

    • Community Transit’s Bus Replacement Project: This project will enable Community Transit to purchase two battery electric buses with chargers to replace diesel buses that are beyond their expected useful life. ($3,000,000)
    • City of Lynden’s Pepin Flood, Agriculture, Salmon and Safety Transportation (FASST): This project will complete design and support construction of a new channel for Pepin Creek, and complete design and construction of the Pepin Parkway Bridge. ($2,448,000)
    • Snohomish County’s Everett Intermodal Yard and Curve Improvements: The project will improve rail shipping capability, safety, and reliability for freight and intercity passenger service at the Everett Intermodal Yard. These improvements will benefit both BNSF freight trains and Amtrak Cascades service. ($2,000,000)

    Investing in Community Services

    • City of Anacortes’ Community Event Center: The project will support final design and construction for a central event space to host large-scale tourist-oriented events, local nonprofit events and private rentals located near the Anacortes waterfront and downtown. ($3,000,000)
    • Lopez Island Family Resource Center’s Food Center: This project will construct a mixed-use food center, including a community kitchen, shared farm stand, rental spaces, and gathering areas for pop-up shops, in addition to a home base for the San Juan Food Hub and local food bank. ($2,500,000)
    • City of Edmonds’ Food Bank and Community Engagement Space: This project will support an expanded facility for Edmonds Food Bank, including increased food bank space, a commercial kitchen, an urban garden and community meeting spaces. ($2,000,000)
    • City of Bellingham’s Bellingham Central Library Renovation: This project will support exterior renovation of the Bellingham Central Library, including updated windows, upgraded main and children’s entrances, and a refreshed plaza. ($2,000,000)
    • Whatcom County and Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault Services of Whatcom County’s (DVSAS) Douglas Building Preservation: This project will support the renovation of a building used by DVSAS to serve survivors of domestic violence and sexual assault. ($1,510,295)
    • Whatcom County Sheriff Office’s Portable Radio Replacement Project: This project will support the purchase of new portable radios to replace outdated radios that are failing, allowing deputies to communicate clearly with dispatch and each other. ($600,000)
    • Orcas Senior Center’s Roof Replacement: This project will repair the failing roof of the facility, ensuring seniors can continue to access services. ($175,000)

    Investing in Education and Workforce Development

    • Edmonds College and Latino Educational Training Institute’s (LETI) Incubator for Family Success: This project will establish a comprehensive community center that includes a cultural retention and arts center, vocational school, commercial kitchen, deli-specialty store and child care circles. ($4,250,000)
    • Western Washington University’s (WWU) Shannon Point Marine Center Research Vessel: This project will support acquisition of a new research vessel for WWU marine and coastal science educational and research activities. ($1,490,400)

    Investing in Critical Infrastructure

    • Port of Everett’s South Marina Terminal Replacement Project: The project will replace the existing Dock 1 in the South Marina that has exceeded its useful life with a new structure that will provide greater utility capacity to serve potential small cruise and passenger ferry service. ($5,000,000)
    • Port of Edmonds’ North Portwalk and Seawall Reconstruction: This project will repair the Port’s seawall, which is urgently needed to protect the Port and surrounding community from flooding and extreme weather. The project will also create new public use spaces for recreational activity and replace the boardwalk to improve public access and increase economic development for the businesses on and surrounding the port. ($4,000,000)
    • Island County’s Recycling and Reuse Station: This project will build a new solid waste transfer station that will significantly enhance the efficiency of the county’s waste management processes, reducing costs for local rate payers and mitigating associated impacts to public health, safety and the environment. ($2,800,000)


    What Northwest Washington Community Leaders and Stakeholders Are Saying

    Community Transit CEO Ric Ilgenfritz on the Bus Replacement Project: “Community Transit ensures that people of all walks of life can easily and reliably get from where they are to where they want to be. In order to live up to this mission, it’s critical that buses are maintained and replaced according to schedule. We are grateful to Rep. Larsen for prioritizing the Bus Replacement Project, enabling us to serve customers with lower pollution buses that benefit everyone in Snohomish County.”

    Lynden Mayor Scott Korthuis on the Pepin Flood, Agriculture, Salmon and Safety Transportation (FASST) Project: “The Lynden FASST project (Flood, Agriculture, Salmon, Safety and Transportation) is a significant investment in infrastructure for the city to provide housing opportunities in what is a difficult area of the city to develop.  With the support of Representative Larsen on this project, we will continue to develop the needed infrastructure in this area of the city and provide a variety of housing types.  We greatly appreciate Representative Larsen moving this project forward and investing in Lynden.”

    Snohomish County Executive Dave Somers on the Everett Intermodal Yard and Curve Improvements Project: “We are grateful for Congressman Larsen’s support for this vital rail project. If we receive the funding, the renovated intermodal yard will allow us and our rail partners to continue a sustainable and low impact operation for our residents, ensuring public health and safety are prioritized.”

    Anacortes Mayor Matt Miller on the Anacortes Community Event Center project: “We are deeply grateful to Congressman Larsen for championing the Anacortes Community Event Center project. His support for this waterfront facility—developed in partnership with the Port of Anacortes—reflects a strong commitment to strengthening our community, our economy, and our shared public spaces. This proposed investment will help create a vibrant gathering place for residents and visitors alike, and we appreciate the Congressman’s leadership in moving this vision forward.”

    Lopez Island Family Resource Center Executive Director Barbara Schultheiss on the Lopez Food Center Project: “The Lopez Food Center believes that a thriving local food system and strong economy are essential to a healthy, sustainable life here on Lopez. The construction of the food center will create a vital central gathering place—that will provide a much needed new space for the food bank; increase sales of local farm products with space for a communal farm stand and the San Juan Food Hub; creates opportunities for food businesses to grow/expand with storage, commercial kitchen and event space; and, provide critical trainings and supports for food businesses.  This shared facility will increase efficient food production and distribution and support the health and well-being of Lopez Island residents by increasing access to nutritious food and hands-on opportunities in the local food economy.”

    Edmonds Mayor Mike Rosen on the Edmonds Food Bank and Community Engagement Space Project: “We greatly appreciate the leadership of Rep. Larsen to support the Edmonds Food Bank. We know that many people in our community are struggling with food insecurity, and sadly the numbers are increasing, so this funding request is vitally important.”

    Edmonds Food Bank Executive Director Casey Davis on the Edmonds Food Bank and Community Engagement Space Project: “We are incredibly grateful to Representative Larsen for continuing to advocate for our community. As the need for food assistance continues to rise and other critical funding sources are eliminated, this $2 million request is vital to help us build a new facility that meets the growing needs of the individuals we serve in a respectful and efficient way. A new food bank and community engagement space will allow us to provide not only nutritious and culturally relevant food, but also deeper connection, dignity, and resources for long-term stability for our entire community. We cannot do this alone, we need the strength of continued partnerships to make this vision a reality.”

    Bellingham Mayor Kim Lund on the Bellingham Central Library Renovation Project: “Our library is a well-loved institution that gives community members opportunities to learn, grow, and connect. We are grateful for Rep. Larsen’s request for funding, which would help us make the library more accessible, comfortable, and welcoming, especially for families and children.”

    Whatcom County Health and Community Services Co-Health Officer Dr. Amy Harley on the DVSAS Douglas Building Preservation Project: “Whatcom County Health and Community Services is pleased to support the rehabilitation of the Douglas Building, the home of Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault Services of Whatcom County (DVSAS) in Bellingham. Washington. The Douglas building is used to provide critical counseling, legal support, and children’s programs for survivors of domestic violence, sexual assault, and sexual exploitation, and is an essential part of the continuum of care for this vulnerable population. The Douglas Building, however, is more than a building – it’s a lifeline for survivors of domestic violence and sexual assault in Whatcom County. Investing in its rehabilitation will ensure that DVSAS staff can continue to provide high-quality, trauma-informed care in a safe and trusted location, where individuals and families can begin the process of healing with dignity and respect.”

    Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault Services of Whatcom County on the DVSAS Douglas Building Preservation Project: “Domestic Violence & Sexual Assault Services of Whatcom County (DVSAS) extends its deepest gratitude to Congressman Larsen and his team for their efforts in prioritizing funding to preserve our downtown support center. Securing this vital funding guarantees continued access to essential services for individuals experiencing domestic or sexual violence, ensuring survivors have a lifeline to safety and immediate access to crisis services. Congressman Larsen’s commitment to preserving our downtown support center ensures everyone in our community has access to safety and support, now and for years to come.”

    Whatcom County Sheriff Donnell “Tank” Tanksley on the Whatcom County Sheriff’s Department Portable Radio Replacement Project: “Great training and bullet-proof vests aren’t all that keep our Patrol Deputies safe. Portable radios ensure deputies can communicate hazards, status and needs in the field. During the upcoming World Cup – with matches in Seattle and Vancouver, B.C. – increasing traffic through Whatcom County, it is vital that radios are interoperable with international agencies. Our current portables are not. We are grateful to Congressman Rick Larsen for his support of this essential need.”

    Orcas Senior Center Board Member John Ehrmantraut on the Orcas Senior Center Roof Replacement Project: As Chair of Orcas Senior Center, I can’t stress enough how critical it is to replace our aging roof —not just to protect the building, but to safeguard the essential services and sense of community this space provides to Orcas Island residents. This center is a cornerstone of our island community, and protecting it means protecting the people who rely on it every day.”

    Edmonds College President Dr. Amit Singh on the LETI Incubator for Family Success Project: “Edmonds College is committed to our partnership with LETI in supporting first generation immigrants and their success. This resource center will empower individuals and families by providing assistance with everything from navigating social services to pursuing higher education. I am very thankful to Representative Larsen for his ongoing support of LETI and Edmonds College.”

    Founder & CEO of Latino Educational Training Institute Rosario Reyes on the LETI Incubator for Family Success Project: “We deeply appreciate Representative Larsen’s support for LETI’s Incubator for Family Success and are grateful to Edmonds College for joining us as a vital partner in this initiative. This new center will serve as a lasting community hub for Latino and low-income families in Snohomish County—a place to celebrate culture, host life events, and access essential services. With dedicated offices and classrooms, LETI will continue advancing its mission to empower Latino families through education, business development, family health, and support for financial advancement.”

    Western Washington University President Sabah Randhawa on the Shannon Point Marine Center Research Vessel Project: “Western Washington University appreciates Representative Larsen’s efforts to include funding for a new research vessel at Shannon Point Marine Center as part of the FY26 budget. If funded, this investment will significantly enhance our ability to study the Salish Sea and surrounding coastal ecosystems while expanding hands-on research opportunities for Washington’s next generation of scientists.”

    Port of Everett CEO Lisa Lefeber on the South Marina Terminal Replacement Project: “The reconstruction of Dock 1 will bring new commercial opportunities to the Everett waterfront, including possible passenger-only ferry service and small regional cruise visits for the first time to the area. This investment in transportation infrastructure will benefit jobs and recreation, therefore investing in our economy. The Port of Everett appreciates Congressman Larsen’s support of this infrastructure investment.”

    Port of Edmonds Commission President David Preston on the North Portwalk and Seawall Reconstruction Project: “We are grateful to Representative Rick Larsen for his continued support of the North Portwalk and Seawall Reconstruction Project. The Port will utilize funds to advance our project into its third and final phase. Vital repairs to the marina seawall will protect the Port and the surrounding area from flooding, erosion, and storm surges. At the same time, the improvements to the Port’s boardwalk will enhance the public’s use and experience on the waterfront.”

    Chair of the Board of Island County Commissioners Jill Johnson on the Island County Recycling and Reuse Station Project: “We are incredibly grateful for Representative Larsen’s leadership and support for Island County. Federal funding for the Island County Recycling and Reuse Station will improve upon and expand the county’s waste removal and recycling capacity, directly enabling growth and increasing environmental resiliency.”

    ###

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Economics: Canada needs a bold electricity plan—now.

    Source: – Press Release/Statement:

    Headline: Canada needs a bold electricity plan—now.

    Electricity Alliance Canada proposes a new federal playbook to secure this country’s economic future.

    Op-ed by Electricity Alliance Canada: Vittoria Bellissimo (President and CEO, Canadian Renewable Energy Association), Francis Bradley (President and CEO, Canadian Electricity Association), Michelle Branigan (CEO, Electricity Human Resources Canada), George Christidis (President and CEO, Canadian Nuclear Association), Elisa Obermann (Executive Director of Marine Renewables Canada) and Lorena Patterson (President and CEO, WaterPower Canada) 

    As Canada welcomes a new federal government, the electricity sector stands at a pivotal juncture. With climate change accelerating, global energy dynamics shifting, the need for electricity increasing, and potential US tariffs waiting in the wings, we cannot afford to lose our national advantage.

    Canadians expect affordable, reliable, and secure power—and we, Canada’s electricity industry, intend to deliver it.

    Canada’s economy was built on affordable, reliable and abundant power. Today, this country is predominantly powered by clean-energy sources, with hydroelectricity accounting for more than 60 per cent of electricity generation. Renewable energy, such as wind and solar, is growing steadily, alongside energy storage solutions. Nuclear power plays a significant role, especially in Ontario and New Brunswick, with opportunities for expansion in other provinces. 

    But our current supply won’t be enough. Canada produces around 630 TWh of electricity per year, yet every province and territory is forecasting a much greater need. As we electrify our industries, bring manufacturing back home, and digitize our economy, the pressure on electricity systems will grow. To meet this demand, we must make substantial investments in electricity generation, transmission and distribution, which will bolster employment opportunities across this country.

    That’s why we are calling on the new federal government to work with the electricity sector on five urgent priorities.

    First and foremost, the electricity industry needs greater clarity so we can move forward at speed. Slow and uncertain approval processes can stymie investment in major projects, leading to delays, cancellations or higher costs. We need an efficient approval process for major electricity projects, and we need to finalize the Clean Economy Investment Tax Credits (ITCs). Further, given the stated intention to proceed with industrial carbon pricing, we recommend a flexible approach to drive environmental gains while promoting innovation and competitiveness without causing regional or sectoral disadvantages.

    Secondly, Canada cannot move forward on clean energy without Indigenous communities. From coast to coast to coast, Indigenous-led or co-owned projects have been at the forefront of clean-energy initiatives. The federal government should ensure Indigenous voices are central to decision-making processes, and expand funding tools like the Canada Infrastructure Bank (CIB) and Indigenous Loan Guarantee program to enable Indigenous partners to participate fully and on their own terms, promoting Reconciliation.

    Thirdly, Canada has talked for years about energy corridors and grid connections across provinces. Now is the time to turn this talk into action. Canada’s provinces and territories offer diverse energy jurisdictions can benefit from supporting each other. We need collaboration between the federal government, provinces, crown corporations and utilities to support interprovincial energy trade and infrastructure projects, along with interpovincial labour mobility in regulated occupations.

    Supply chains are also critical to our success. To build the grid of the future and support Canada’s growth, we need secure and proven supply chains. Globalized supply chains—on which our electricity projects depend—have faced significant challenges over the past year, including international tariffs, increased regulatory requirements and ongoing trade tensions with the US. The federal government needs to help manage risk and secure the electricity sector’s supply chains.

    Finally, we need a strong system to train and produce skilled workers. Canada’s growing electricity sector relies on a workforce of well-trained tradespeople and engineers to fill new, high-quality job opportunities. This workforce will build and operate a stable, reliable and resilient system that supports Canada’s economic and environmental goals and provides a good quality of life for Canadians. We appreciate the federal government’s past support, now calling on them to continue to invest in long-term training programs to develop an expanded, world-class workforce.

    Affordable, reliable, clean electricity is a strategic Canadian advantage, and the electricity sector is the backbone of our economy. We’ve increased supply while lowering emissions, and we will continue to do so. As we welcome the new federal government, we’re ready to get to work building a strong and resilient electricity system that will meet Canada’s rising demand and secure our economic future. And for this work to succeed, Canada needs a bold electricity plan, now.
    The post Canada needs a bold electricity plan—now. appeared first on Canadian Renewable Energy Association.

    MIL OSI Economics

  • MIL-OSI USA: Hickenlooper, Banks Introduce Bipartisan Bill to Streamline How VA Builds Medical Facilities, Deliver Care to Vets Quicker

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Colorado John Hickenlooper

    WASHINGTON – U.S. Senators John Hickenlooper and Jim Banks introduced the bipartisan VA Design-Build Construction Enhancement Act to streamline how the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) builds new facilities and improve veterans’ access to care.

    “Veterans deserve modern, quality health care,” said Hickenlooper. “Our bipartisan bill will streamline construction and save money to help the VA deliver the care vets need.”

    “The number one obstacle standing between veterans and the care they’ve earned is bureaucracy,” said Banks. “This bill streamlines the VA’s construction process so we can get hospitals built faster and deliver better outcomes for those who served.”

    Specifically, the legislation directs the VA to use the design-build method where a single contractor handles both design and construction for major medical facility projects. The bill also ensures the VA includes design-build training in its construction management programs and allows agencies like the Army Corps of Engineers to use the method without interference.

    Key provisions include:

    • Directing the VA Secretary to follow existing federal laws to consider design-build when entering into contracts to design and construct facilities
    • Prevents the VA from discouraging the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, which manages the largest construction projects on VA’s behalf, from using design-build
    • Includes design-build components in VA’s training program for construction managers

    Full text of the bill is available HERE.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI: Capital City Bank Group, Inc. Announces Cash Dividend

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    TALLAHASSEE, Fla., May 29, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — The Board of Directors of Capital City Bank Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: CCBG) declared a quarterly cash dividend on its common stock of $0.24 per share. The dividend produces an annualized rate of $0.96 per common share and is payable on June 23, 2025 to shareowners of record as of June 9, 2025. The annualized dividend yield is 2.52% based on a closing stock price of $38.06 on May 28, 2025.

    About Capital City Bank Group, Inc.
    Capital City Bank Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: CCBG) is one of the largest publicly traded financial holding companies headquartered in Florida and has approximately $4.5 billion in assets. We provide a full range of banking services, including traditional deposit and credit services, mortgage banking, asset management, trust, merchant services, bankcards, securities brokerage services and financial advisory services, including the sale of life insurance, risk management and asset protection services. Our bank subsidiary, Capital City Bank, was founded in 1895 and now has 62 banking offices and 105 ATMs/ITMs in Florida, Georgia and Alabama. For more information about Capital City Bank Group, Inc., visit www.ccbg.com.

    For Information Contact:
    Jep Larkin
    Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
    850.402.8450

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI USA: Statement on Certain Protocol Staking Activities

    Source: Securities and Exchange Commission

    Introduction

    As part of an effort to provide greater clarity on the application of the federal securities laws to crypto assets,[1] the Division of Corporation Finance is providing its views[2] on certain activities known as “staking” on networks that use proof-of-stake (“PoS”) as a consensus mechanism (“PoS Networks”). Specifically, this statement addresses the staking of crypto assets that are intrinsically linked to the programmatic functioning of a public, permissionless network, and are used to participate in and/or earned for participating in such network’s consensus mechanism or otherwise used to maintain and/or earned for maintaining the technological operation and security of such network. We refer in this statement to these crypto assets as “Covered Crypto Assets”[3] and their staking on PoS Networks as “Protocol Staking.”

    Protocol Staking

    Networks rely upon cryptography and economic mechanism design to reduce reliance on designated trusted intermediaries to verify network transactions and provide settlement assurances to users. The operation of each network is governed by an underlying software protocol, consisting of computer code, that programmatically enforces certain network rules, technical requirements, and rewards distributions. Each protocol incorporates a “consensus mechanism,” which is a method for enabling the distributed network of unrelated computers (known as “nodes”) that maintain the peer-to-peer network to agree on the “state” (or authoritative record of network address ownership balances, transactions, smart contract code, and other data) of the network. Public, permissionless networks allow users to participate in the network’s operation, including the validation of new transactions to the network in accordance with the network’s consensus mechanism.

    PoS is a consensus mechanism used to prove that operators of nodes (“Node Operators”) participating in the network have contributed value to the network that, in some cases, can be forfeited if they act dishonestly.[4] In a PoS Network, a Node Operator must stake the network’s Covered Crypto Asset to be selected programmatically by the network’s underlying software protocol to validate new blocks of data to, and update the state of, the network. When selected, the Node Operator serves as a “Validator.” In exchange for providing validation services, Validators earn “rewards” of two types: (1) newly minted (or created) Covered Crypto Assets that are programmatically distributed to the Validator by the network in accordance with its underlying software protocol; and (2) a percentage of the transaction fees, paid in Covered Crypto Assets, by parties who are seeking to add their transactions to the network.[5]

    In PoS Networks, Node Operators must commit or “stake” Covered Crypto Assets to be eligible to validate and earn rewards, typically effected using a smart contract, which is a self-executing program that automates the actions required in a network transaction. While staked, Covered Crypto Assets are “locked-up” and cannot be transferred for a period of time under the terms of the applicable protocol.[6] The Validator does not take possession or control of staked Covered Crypto Assets, which means that ownership and control of Covered Crypto Assets do not change while they are staked.

    Each PoS Network’s underlying software protocol contains the rules for operating and maintaining the PoS Network, including the method of selecting Validators among Node Operators. Some protocols provide for random selection of Validators while others employ specific criteria for selecting Validators, such as the number of Covered Crypto Assets staked by the Node Operators. Protocols also may contain rules intended to deter activities that are detrimental to the network’s security and integrity, such as validating invalid blocks or double signing (which occurs when a Validator attempts to add the same transaction to the network multiple times, effectively spending the same crypto assets more than once).[7]

    Rewards from Protocol Staking provide an economic incentive for participants to use their Covered Crypto Assets to secure the PoS Network and ensure its continued operation. An increase in the amount of staked Covered Crypto Assets can increase the security of PoS Networks and mitigate the risk that a hostile party is able to gain control of a majority of the total staked Covered Crypto Assets, which would allow such party to manipulate the PoS Network by influencing the validation of transactions and potentially altering the network’s transaction history.

    Covered Crypto Asset owners can earn rewards by serving as a Node Operator and staking their own Covered Crypto Assets. When self (or solo) staking, the owner maintains ownership and control of its Covered Crypto Assets and cryptographic private “keys” at all times.

    Alternatively, Covered Crypto Asset owners can participate in the PoS Network validation process without running their own nodes by using self-custodial staking directly with a third party. Covered Crypto Asset owners grant their validation rights to a third-party Node Operator.[8] When using a third-party Node Operator, the Covered Crypto Asset owner receives a portion of the rewards, with the provider also earning a portion of the rewards for its services in validating transactions. When self-custodial staking directly with a third party, the Covered Crypto Asset owner retains ownership and control of its Covered Crypto Assets and its private keys.

    In addition to self (or solo) staking and self-custodial staking directly with a third party, a third form of Protocol Staking is so-called “custodial” staking, in which a third party (a “Custodian”) takes custody of the owners’ Covered Crypto Assets and facilitates staking of such Covered Crypto Assets on behalf of the owner. When owners deposit their Covered Crypto Assets with a Custodian, the Custodian holds the deposited Covered Crypto Assets in a digital “wallet” that the Custodian controls. The Custodian stakes the Covered Crypto Assets on the owner’s behalf for an agreed-upon portion of any rewards, either using a node the Custodian operates or through a third-party Node Operator the Custodian selects. At all times during the staking process, the deposited Covered Crypto Assets remain in the control of the Custodian and the Covered Crypto Asset owner is intended to retain ownership of the Covered Crypto Assets held by the Custodian.[9] Further, the deposited Covered Crypto Assets are: (1) not used by the Custodian for operational or general business purposes; (2) not lent, pledged, or rehypothecated for any reason; and (3) held in a manner designed not to subject them to claims by third parties. To this end, the Custodian does not use the deposited Covered Crypto Assets to engage in leverage, trading, speculation, or discretionary activities.

    Division’s View on Protocol Staking Activities

    It is the Division’s view that “Protocol Staking Activities” (as defined below) in connection with Protocol Staking do not involve the offer and sale of securities within the meaning of Section 2(a)(1) of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) or Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”).[10] Accordingly, it is the Division’s view that participants in Protocol Staking Activities do not need to register with the Commission transactions under the Securities Act, or fall within one of the Securities Act’s exemptions from registration in connection with these Protocol Staking Activities.

    Protocol Staking Activities Covered by this Statement

    The Division’s view pertains to the following Protocol Staking activities and transactions (“Protocol Staking Activities” and each a “Protocol Staking Activity”):

    • staking Covered Crypto Assets on a PoS Network;
    • the activities undertaken by third parties involved in the Protocol Staking process ‒ including, but not limited to, third-party Node Operators, Validators, Custodians, Delegates and Nominators (“Service Providers”) ‒ including their roles in connection with the earning and distribution of rewards; and
    • providing Ancillary Services (as defined below).

    Only Protocol Staking Activities undertaken in connection with the following types of Protocol Staking are addressed in this statement.

    • Self (or Solo) Staking, which involves a Node Operator staking Covered Crypto Assets it owns and controls using its own resources. The Node Operator may include one or more persons acting together to operate a node and stake their Covered Crypto Assets.
    • Self-Custodial Staking Directly with a Third Party, which involves a Node Operator, under the terms of the protocol, being granted the validation rights of owner(s) of Covered Crypto Assets. Reward payments may flow from the PoS Network directly to the Covered Crypto Asset owners or indirectly to them through the Node Operator.
    • Custodial Arrangements, which involve a Custodian staking on behalf of the owners of the Covered Crypto Assets that the Custodian holds on their behalf. For example, a crypto asset trading platform holding deposited Covered Crypto Assets for its customers may stake such Covered Crypto Assets on behalf of such customers on a PoS Network that permits delegation on behalf of and with the consent of customers. The Custodian will stake the deposited Covered Crypto Assets using its own node or select a third-party Node Operator. In the latter case, this selection is the Custodian’s only decision in the staking process.

    Discussion of Protocol Staking Activities

    Section 2(a)(1) of the Securities Act and Section 3(a)(10) of the Exchange Act each defines the term “security” by providing a list of various financial instruments, including “stock,” “note,” and “bond.” Because a Covered Crypto Asset does not constitute any of the financial instruments that are specifically enumerated in the definition of “security,” we conduct our analysis of certain transactions involving Covered Crypto Assets in the context of Protocol Staking under the “investment contract” test set forth in SEC v. W.J. Howey Co.[11] The “Howey test” is used to analyze arrangements or instruments not listed in those statutory sections based on their “economic realities.”[12]

    In evaluating the economic realities of a transaction, the test is whether there is an investment of money in a common enterprise premised on a reasonable expectation of profits to be derived from the entrepreneurial or managerial efforts of others.[13] Federal courts since Howey have explained that Howey’s “efforts of others” requirement is satisfied when “the efforts made by those other than the investor are the undeniably significant ones, those essential managerial efforts which affect the failure or success of the enterprise.”[14] Federal courts also have stated that administrative and ministerial activities are not managerial or entrepreneurial efforts that satisfy Howey’s efforts of others prong.[15]

    Self (or Solo) Staking

    A Node Operator’s Self (or Solo) Staking is not undertaken with a reasonable expectation of profits to be derived from the entrepreneurial or managerial efforts of others. Rather, Node Operators contribute their own resources and stake their own Covered Crypto Assets, thereby securing the PoS Network and facilitating the network’s operation through the validation of new blocks, which enables them to qualify for rewards issued by the PoS Network in accordance with its underlying software protocol. To earn rewards, the Node Operator’s activities must comply with the rules of the protocol. By staking its own Covered Crypto Assets and engaging in Protocol Staking, the Node Operator is merely engaging in an administrative or ministerial activity to secure the PoS Network and facilitate its operation. A Node Operator’s expectation to receive rewards is not derived from any third party’s managerial or entrepreneurial efforts upon which the PoS Network’s success depends. Instead, the expected financial incentive from the protocol is derived solely from the administrative or ministerial act of Protocol Staking. As such, rewards are payments to the Node Operator in exchange for the services it provides to the network rather than profits derived from the entrepreneurial or managerial efforts of others.

    Self-Custodial Staking Directly with a Third Party

    Likewise, where an owner of a Covered Crypto Asset grants its validation rights to a Node Operator, the Covered Crypto Asset owner has no expectation of profit derived from the entrepreneurial or managerial efforts of others. The Node Operator’s service to the Covered Crypto Asset owner is administrative or ministerial in nature, not entrepreneurial or managerial for the reasons discussed above with respect to Self (or Solo) Staking. Whether a Node Operator stakes its own Covered Crypto Assets or is granted validation rights from other Covered Crypto Asset owners does not alter the nature of Protocol Staking for purposes of the Howey analysis. In either case, Protocol Staking remains an administrative or ministerial activity, and the expected financial incentive is derived solely from such activity and not the success of the PoS Network or some other third party. Further, the Node Operator does not guarantee or otherwise set or fix the amount of the rewards owed to Covered Crypto Asset owners, although the Node Operator may subtract from such amount its fees (whether fixed or a percentage of such amount).

    Custodial Arrangements

    In a custodial arrangement, the Custodian (whether a Node Operator or not) does not provide entrepreneurial or managerial efforts to Covered Crypto Asset owners for whom it provides this service. These arrangements are similar to those discussed above where a Covered Crypto Asset owner grants its validation rights to a third party but they also involve the owner granting custody of its deposited Covered Crypto Assets. The Custodian does not decide whether, when, or how much of an owner’s Covered Crypto Assets to stake. The Custodian simply is acting as an agent in connection with staking the deposited Covered Crypto Assets on behalf of the owner.[16] In addition, the Custodian’s taking custody of the deposited Covered Crypto Assets and in some cases selecting a Node Operator is not sufficient to satisfy Howey’s “efforts of others” requirement because these activities are administrative or ministerial in nature and do not involve managerial or entrepreneurial efforts. Further, the Custodian does not guarantee or otherwise set or fix the amount of the rewards owed to Covered Crypto Asset owners, although the Custodian may subtract from such amount its fees (whether fixed or a percentage of such amount).

    Ancillary Services

    Service Providers may provide the services described below (“Ancillary Services”) to Covered Crypto Asset owners in connection with Protocol Staking. Each of these Ancillary Services is merely administrative or ministerial in nature and does not involve entrepreneurial or managerial efforts. They are facets of a general activity ‒ Protocol Staking ‒ that itself is not entrepreneurial or managerial in nature.

    • Slashing Coverage, where the Service Provider reimburses or indemnifies a staking customer against loss resulting from slashing. This protection against a Node Operator’s errors is similar to that offered by service providers in many types of traditional commercial transactions.
    • Early Unbonding, where a Service Provider allows Covered Crypto Assets to be returned to an owner before the end of the protocol’s unbonding period.[17] This service merely shortens the protocol’s effective unbonding period as a convenience to the Covered Crypto Asset owner by reducing the burden of the unbonding period.
    • Alternate Rewards Payment Schedules and Amounts, where the Service Provider delivers earned rewards at a cadence and in an amount that differs from the protocol’s set schedule and/or where the rewards are paid earlier or less frequently than the protocol awards them, provided the reward amounts are not fixed, guaranteed, or greater than those awarded by the protocol. Similar to early unbonding, this is merely an optional convenience afforded to Covered Crypto Asset owners in connection with the administration of rewards allocation and delivery.
    • Aggregation of Covered Crypto Assets, where the Service Provider offers the ability for Covered Crypto Asset owners to aggregate their Covered Crypto Assets to meet the protocol’s staking minimums. This service is part of the validation process, which itself is administrative or ministerial in nature. Without more, aggregating the Covered Crypto Assets of owners to help enable staking is similarly administrative or ministerial in nature.

    Whether offered separately or as a group of services, the Service Provider does not act in a managerial or entrepreneurial way if it provides any or all of these services.

    For further information, please contact the Division’s Office of Chief Counsel by submitting a web-based request form at https://www.sec.gov/forms/corp_fin_interpretive.


    [1]  For purposes of this statement, a “crypto asset” is an asset that is generated, issued, and/or transferred using a blockchain or similar distributed ledger technology network (“crypto network”), including, but not limited to, assets known as “tokens,” “digital assets,” “virtual currencies,” and “coins,” and that relies on cryptographic protocols. In addition, for purposes of this statement, a “network” refers to a crypto network.

    [2]  This statement represents the views of the staff of the Division of Corporation Finance (the “Division”). It is not a rule, regulation, guidance, or statement of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”), and the Commission has neither approved nor disapproved its content. This statement, like all staff statements, has no legal force or effect: it does not alter or amend applicable law, and it creates no new or additional obligations for any person.

    [3]  This statement only addresses certain activities involving Covered Crypto Assets that do not have intrinsic economic properties or rights, such as generating a passive yield or conveying rights to future income, profits, or assets of a business enterprise.

    [4]  This statement addresses Protocol Staking generally rather than all of its variations. Further, this statement does not address all forms of “staking,” such as so-called “liquid staking,” “restaking” or “liquid restaking.” The specific staking activities covered by this statement are discussed below in “Protocol Staking Activities Covered by this Statement.”

    [5]  While the protocol establishes rules on rewards, Node Operators generally are free to share rewards or impose fees for their services in ways that differ from those of the protocol. Some protocols permit a Node Operator to propose and receive a reward that differs from the protocol’s standard reward.

    [6]  The minimum staking or lock-up period varies among PoS protocols.

    [7]  A Node Operator or Validator may have its staked Covered Crypto Assets forfeited or “slashed” if it engages in such detrimental activities or fails to adhere to the PoS Network’s technical requirements.

    [8]  On certain PoS Networks, Covered Crypto Asset owners can stake their Covered Crypto Assets and receive validation rights that they can grant to a third party, thereby allowing the third party to use the staked Covered Crypto Assets to verify transactions on the PoS Network on behalf of the owners. For example, some PoS Networks may facilitate this by allowing a Covered Crypto Asset owner to “delegate” its validation rights to a Node Operator. In this case, the Node Operator acts as a so-called “Delegate” in the staking process. Other PoS Networks may use so-called “Nominators” to whom a Covered Crypto Asset owner may grant its validation rights to act on the Covered Crypto Asset owner’s behalf in selecting Validators.

    [9]  The Custodian typically enters into an agreement with the owner, such as a user agreement or terms of service, providing that the owner retains ownership of the Covered Crypto Assets.

    [10]  The Division’s view is not dispositive as to whether any specific Protocol Staking Activity (defined below) involves the offer and sale of a security. A definitive determination requires analyzing the facts relating to the specific Protocol Staking Activity. Where facts vary from those presented in this statement, the Division’s view as to whether the specific Protocol Staking Activity involves the offer and sale of a security may be different.

    [11]  328 U.S. 293 (1946). We do not believe Protocol Staking generally and the “Protocol Staking Activities” defined in this statement and upon which we express our view in this statement involve notes or other evidences of indebtedness because at all times during the staking process the Covered Crypto Asset owner retains ownership of its Covered Crypto Assets (either directly or through a Custodian).

    [12]  See Landreth Timber Co. v. Landreth, 471 U.S. 681, 689 (1985), in which the U.S. Supreme Court suggested that the proper test for determining whether a particular instrument that is not clearly within the definition of “stock” as set forth in Section 2(a)(1) of the Securities Act, or that otherwise is of an unusual nature, is the economic realities test set forth in Howey. In analyzing whether an instrument is a security, “form should be disregarded for substance,” Tcherepnin v. Knight, 389 U.S. 332, 336 (1967), “and the emphasis should be on economic realities underlying a transaction, and not on the name appended thereto.” United Housing Found., Inc. v. Forman, 421 U.S. 837, 849 (1975).

    [13]  Forman, 421 U.S. at 852.

    [14]  See, e.g., SEC v. Glenn W. Turner Enterprises, Inc., 474 F.2d 476, 482 (9th Cir. 1973).

    [15]  See, e.g., First Fin. Fed. Sav. & Loan v. E.F. Hutton Mortgage, 834 F.2d 685 (8th Cir. 1987) (activities performed were merely administrative and ministerial in nature and therefore did not constitute the managerial or entrepreneurial efforts of others); Union Planters National Bank of Memphis v. Commercial Credit Business Loans, Inc., 651 F.2d 1174 (6th Cir. 1981) (administrative tasks and services are not managerial or entrepreneurial under Howey). See also Donovan v. GMO-Z.com Trust, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27871 (S.D.N.Y. 2025) (“Ministerial, technical, and clerical tasks often are ‘necessary’ for an investment scheme to operate and thereby generate a profit, but courts have long found such efforts to be insufficient under Howey’s third prong.”).

    [16]  If a Custodian does select whether, when, or how much of an owner’s Covered Crypto Assets to stake, its activities are outside the scope of this statement.

    [17]  Staked Covered Crypto Assets are subject to a “bonding period,” which is a length of time set by the protocol after which time the Covered Crypto Asset owner becomes eligible to earn rewards. The “unbonding period” is a length of time set by the protocol to “unstake” a Covered Crypto Asset. Each protocol has its own bonding and unbonding periods, which can be hours, days, or weeks.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Security: Ocala Woman Indicted For Bank Robbery

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    Ocala, Florida – United States Attorney Gregory W. Kehoe announces the  return by a grand jury of an indictment charging Christina Gates Thagard (40, Ocala) with bank robbery. If convicted, Thagard faces a maximum penalty of 20 years in federal prison. Thagard was arrested on May 24, 2025. She is currently detained pending the resolution of the case. 

    According to the indictment, on May 3, 2025, Thagard took money belonging to TD Bank by using force, violence, and intimidation. The bank’s deposits are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC).

    An indictment is merely a formal charge that a defendant has committed one or more violations of federal criminal law, and every defendant is presumed innocent unless, and until, proven guilty.

    This case was investigated by the Ocala Police Department and the Federal Bureau of Investigation. It will be prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Sarah Janette Swartzberg.

    The case is part of Operation Take Back America, a nationwide initiative that marshals the full resources of the Department of Justice to repel the invasion of illegal immigration, achieve the total elimination of cartels and transnational criminal organizations (TCOs), and protect our communities from the perpetrators of violent crime. Operation Take Back America streamlines efforts and resources from the Department’s Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Forces (OCDETFs) and Project Safe Neighborhood (PSN).

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI USA: Senator Marshall Applauds EPA for Awarding Nearly $4 Million in Grants to Clean Up Communities Across Kansas

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Kansas Roger Marshall

    Washington – U.S. Senator Roger Marshall, M.D. (R-Kansas) released the following statement after U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Lee Zeldin announced the selection of nearly $4 million in Brownfields Grants to clean up Kansas communities.
    “I am grateful to EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin for awarding nearly $4 million to the Sunflower State,” Senator Marshall said. “This funding will help us revitalize our communities, create opportunities for growth, and protect Kansans’ health. Thanks to President Donald Trump’s leadership, the EPA is restoring American greatness by ensuring we have the cleanest air, land, and water while being good stewards of American taxpayer dollars.”
    “The $267 million in Brownfield Grants will transform contaminated properties into valuable spaces for businesses and housing, creating new opportunities that strengthen local economies and directly benefit American families,” EPA Administrator Zeldin said. “EPA’s Brownfields program demonstrates how environmental stewardship and economic prosperity complement each other. Under President Trump’s leadership, EPA is Powering the Great American Comeback, ensuring our nation has the cleanest air, land, and water while supporting sustainable growth and fiscal responsibility.”
    EPA Region 7 Administrator Jim Macy, Kansas Department of Health and Environment Secretary Janet Stanek, and Mitchell County Economic Development Director Emily Benedick also joined Senator Marshall and EPA Administrator Zeldin in releasing the following statements.
    “EPA Region 7 is proud to work with our partners across the state of Kansas, advancing cooperative federalism and empowering local and state partners to take the lead in revitalizing their communities,” EPA Region 7 Administrator Jim Macy said. “This collaborative approach ensures fiscal responsibility, promotes economic development, and transforms potentially contaminated properties into clean, usable land that supports long-term growth and sustainability.”
    “The Community Wide Assessment Grant for State and Tribal will help increase property values and create jobs across Kansas,” Kansas Department of Health and Environment Secretary Janet Stanek said. “Receiving these substantial dollars to support the redevelopment of brownfields throughout the state not only benefits the environment, but it elevates communities and industries by turning underutilized and vacant properties into productive ones. This is a win for the entire state.”
    “The City of Beloit is incredibly grateful and excited to receive EPA Brownfield Cleanup funding. This funding enables our community to repurpose two vacant buildings into housing, a critical need in our rural community,” Mitchell County Economic Development Director Emily Benedick said. “This grant gives us the peace of mind to know we are providing a safe environment for future housing development.”
    The following organizations in Kansas have been selected to receive EPA Brownfields funding:

    The City of Beloit has been selected to receive $418,620. Grant funds will be used to clean up the Kansas Industrial School Campus, located at 1720 N. Hersey Avenue. The 0.8-acre cleanup site operated as a juvenile detention center for girls and has been vacant since 2009. It is contaminated with inorganic contaminants. Grant funds will also be used to conduct community engagement activities.
    The Flint Hills Regional Council has been selected to receive $1 million. The grant will be used to capitalize a revolving loan fund (RLF), from which Flint Hills Regional Council Inc. will provide up to three loans and up to two subgrants to support cleanup activities. Grant funds will also be used to establish the RLF, market the program, and support community engagement activities. RLF activities will focus on Chase, Geary, Lyon, Morris, Pottawatomie, Riley, and Wabaunsee counties, with a focus on the cities of Herington, Junction City, and Manhattan.
    The Kansas Department of Health and Environment has been selected to receive $2 million. Community-wide grant funds will be used to conduct 116 Phase I and Phase II environmental site assessments. Grant funds will also support the development of at least three cleanup plans and at least one community meeting annually, with each community to provide general updates on the grant. The target area for this grant includes the Oak Grove neighborhood in Kansas City and the cities of Eureka and El Dorado. Priority sites include Land Bank properties in Oak Grove; a former horse racetrack, a former nursing home, sites adjacent to the existing fire department to accommodate its expansion, Memorial Hall, and the former Masonic Lodge in Eureka; and the Grizzly Development in El Dorado.
    The City of Topeka has been selected to receive $500,000. Community-wide grant funds will be used to conduct eight Phase I and three Phase II environmental site assessments. Grant funds will also be used to inventory brownfield sites and support reuse planning and community engagement activities. The target area for this grant is the City of Topeka. Priority sites include the 36-acre, former White Lakes Mall and two former schools.

    Background:
    EPA’s Brownfields program began in 1995 and has provided nearly $2.9 billion in Brownfield Grants to assess and clean up contaminated properties and return blighted properties to productive reuse. To date, brownfield investments have leveraged over $42 billion in cleanup and redevelopment. Over the years, the relatively small investment of federal funding created over 220,500 jobs from both public and private sources.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Keynote Remarks of Commissioner Kristin Johnson at the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas

    Source: US Commodity Futures Trading Commission

    Good afternoon. Thank you to President Lorie Logan, Senior Vice President and Senior Advisor to the President Sam Schulhofer-Wohl, and the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas for hosting us. Consistent with the title selected for the Symposium, today’s discussion will explore AI Risks and Opportunities Across the Digital and Cyber Landscape, including a broad range of topics focused on fostering responsible innovation, as well as topics focused on proactively addressing potential risks. As always allow me to share a standard disclaimer. My views are my own and not necessarily the views of the Commission, Commission staff or my fellow Commissioners. 
    This morning, I gave a livestream interview from my hotel with Reunion Tower standing tall behind me, offering an impressive landmark as background for the interview. For those of you who are not familiar, Reunion Tower is an iconic symbol in the Dallas skyline. Like Reunion Tower and the breathtaking 360-degree view it provides, our smart approach to supervision of financial markets has enabled us to create and boast the deepest and most liquid capital and derivatives markets in the world while still maintaining the ability to see the market from any angle. How have we achieved these goals? We have harnessed lessons from the customs and traditions that built successful market and prudential supervision and oversight for over one hundred years under federal legislation and for over two hundred and fifty years since the founding of our nation. At the same time, we are forward-looking, appreciating the innovative design and potential for technology to shape enduring, healthy, competitive financial markets that foster market integrity and stability and promote customer and investor protection. 
    It is an honor to be here and to see so many familiar faces, including market and prudential regulators, industry representatives from traditional financial services firms and emerging technologies, academics, and public interest advocates. Any successful convening on the issues that we will tackle today requires a multi-stakeholder dialogue drawing on all corners to help us ensure that supervision and oversight are best-in-class and fit-for-purpose.
    As I intimated, today’s Symposium will explore topics that are at the core of our markets and reflect the future of finance. In my time as a Commissioner, and for decades prior to my public service, I have worked to ensure first-best outcomes for our economy, customer protection, and industry initiatives in these areas.
    AI: Generating New Buzz
    Over the last few decades, we have witnessed the evolution of a number of technologies. While thoughts of artificial intelligence, automation, and robotics have long populated sci-fi novels and films, it was only during the last half-century that sentient technology became an increasing feature in financial markets. The advent and advances in computer technology and computing capabilities have significantly accelerated the adoption of various forms of AI in financial markets and enhanced the efficiency and execution of various back-office and compliance functions that were sources of consternation and crises forty or fifty years ago. 
    Three distinct phases of AI have marked the most recent chapter of financial markets development and evolution – the creation of supervised and unsupervised machine learning algorithms, the creation of generative AI (GenAI), and most recently, the launch of agentic AI. As we transverse the most recent stages of these innovative developments, I think that expert, industry, and customer protection driven dialogues are essential to the creation of any potential regulation or simply effective oversight and supervision of financial markets. I am looking forward to hearing from panelists today regarding the potential and possible limitations of the most cutting-edge aspects of this most recent phase AI of developments. 
    GenAI 
    A Treasury report focused on AI-based cybersecurity risks in the financial services sector notes that:
    The term “Generative AI” means the class of AI models that emulate the structure and characteristics of input data in order to generate derived synthetic content. This can include images, videos, audio, text, and other digital content.[1]
    In general, a user inputs a specific prompt into an interface to produce synthetic content. Tools like ChatGPT and Claude apply this model to produce text, audio, and images based on the input.  As we all quickly noticed, GenAI has real limitations. For example, non-determinism, or the potential for different outputs to result from the same input, and hallucinations – that is, notwithstanding reliance on incredibly large amounts of data gathered from the internet, GenAI models may generate false information that is highly persuasive.[2] 
    Notwithstanding a general propensity to be accurate, current GenAI models may not comprehend certain real-world roadblocks because these models rely heavily on user input and training data to predict patterns. 
    For example, a GenAI model trained on a LLM similar to the LLMs that enable GPT-4 can successfully offer highly accurate driving directions in New York City.  However, when adding street closures or detours (both of which are common in many cities) the models struggled to achieve the same performance level and the accuracy of the models’ predictions were drastically reduced.[3] 
    There is tremendous potential for GenAI to facilitate execution of regulatory reporting and compliance obligations. Regulators supervising markets may use GenAI for supervisory technology (SupTech) to better enable oversight of know-your-customer (KYC) and anti-money laundering (AML) compliance, to expedite routine reporting and to enable efficient review of responses and comment letters issued in connection with requests for information or comment on important, timely issues emerging in financial markets.
    Agentic AI 
    More recent efforts of technologists have generated a next-level AI model that does more than generate synthetic content. Agentic AI endeavors to make decisions, take actions, and adapt to changing inputs. So, for example, an agentic AI model would not be thumped by the road closures and detours that crop up on a map of busy New York City streets. An agentic AI model can tackle these new obstacles, adapting as the information inputs regarding routing change.
    Agentic AI introduces AI agents designed to complete tasks in an autonomous manner. According to the Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s (MIT) Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Lab (CSAIL), Agentic AI is “designed to pursue complex goals with autonomy and predictability” by “taking goal-directed actions, making contextual decisions, and adjusting plans based on changing conditions with minimal human oversight” to enhance productivity.[4] What does this mean for those of us who do not have an advanced degree in computer science and artificial intelligence from MIT? Agentic AI focuses on the creation and utilization of autonomous, task-based agents to showcase AI’s ability to do, rather than to just create. 
    Potential applications of this technology are widespread and include healthcare (identifying, mapping, monitoring, and predicting disease prognosis), global logistics (rerouting to optimize shipped commodities due to weather, geopolitical events, or other exogenous events in a supply chain), and even simply, creature comfort energy optimization (adjusting heating, air conditioning, and lighting for maximum efficiency). In the financial services industry, and broadly our markets, the potential found in agentic AI presents an array of cost savings and efficiencies to be had with the proper implementation of this technology. For example, manual transaction reviews typically conducted in different types of auditing can be completed by AI agents who autonomously scan financial statements and flag those transactions which do not comply with their respective regulations. Credit scoring models, which typically rely on static data, now have the potential to rely on real-time transaction data, behavior trends and economic indicators and can continuously monitor credit instead of providing credit snap shots.[5] Agentic AI can also be used to create processes to improve efficiencies in customer interactions through automation in financial planning and optimization of client communications, and in market intelligence by monitoring the vast data produced by the markets each day and analyzing the data for notable shifts to alert analysts for opportunities and risks.[6] More importantly, from a regulator’s perspective, at least, properly architected agentic AI systems can produce robust compliance and fraud prevention systems, including those that can monitor for AML risks by flagging and dynamically intervening in high-risk transactions, automating claims triaging and refining risk assessments in claims and underwriting, tracking real-time market threats and making risk mitigation recommendations with robust data sets, end and even identifying bugs, deploying automatic updates, and ensuring compliance with software compliance testing in real time.[7] 
    In the context of producing systems that can complete tasks without human oversight, like creating robust compliance and reporting systems that can create tangible operational efficiencies and increase compliance with applicable regulations, agentic AI builds upon GenAI in every discernable way. It does so by being distinct from GenAI in four ways: a focus on action and decision-making rather than creating synthetic data and content; removal of the necessity to continuously input prompts; an ability to act independently to carry out activities and tasks within its parameters; and, compared to GenAI whose programs are static once trained, the ability to continuously change and remain dynamic by adjusting to data and learning from its own mistakes.[8]
    But with every great opportunity comes risk. Agentic AI suffers from a vulnerability in that outputs are only as good as inputs – meaning, if the training model data is biased, incomplete, or otherwise compromised, agentic AI outputs may be similarly inadequate. 
    Perhaps more immediately concerning for regulators who are cops on the financial markets beat, as the potential for positive, efficient, market-enhancing use cases AI grow, so too does the potential for misuse of the same technology by bad actors. The increasing power of GenAI to create synthetic data, which might be inaccurately produced due to purposeful prompting by a bad actor or produced due to its own vulnerabilities and insufficient data sets, has created the ability to insert misleading or malicious data which might lead to hallucinations in output from the AI agents. Because they work autonomously, if improperly architected, this has the potential to create a continuous loop of improper data and feedback, effectively poisoning the model’s own data. Further, agentic AI suffers some of the same vulnerabilities and risks to that of GenAI, including privacy concerns over the vast amounts of data used to fuel the algorithms and data learning sets, risks associated with fairness and bias due to incomplete or over representative data, and to data leakages and model inference attacks which can leak sensitive data.[9]
    Other risks that should be carefully considered as agentic AI models are integrated into our markets include the limitations of synthetic data, data leakages, data integrity, data security, data privacy, ethical concerns, the absence of a human in the loop, security vulnerabilities (hijacking or exploitation), and accountability among others. 
    Cyber Threats: The AI Problem and Solution 
    Over the course of my service, discussions of cybersecurity and artificial intelligence have become increasingly intertwined. I have closely followed these topics and the increasing volume and severity of cyberattacks in part due to the rise in AI used by bad actors to perpetrate these attacks. Over the last year in particular, several reports highlight the rise in cyberthreats across financial markets and discuss potential risks that cyber threats pose.[10] I have continuously advocated for the Commission to take a leading role among domestic and international regulators in addressing these issues to ensure that our market participants are prepared, and in turn, that our overall markets remain resilient.
    In April, my remarks at an AI summit highlighted findings from the Treasury report on AI-fueled cyber and fraud threats that pose significant risks to our markets, including AI-driven fraud, vulnerabilities of technology, and synthetic identities and impersonation. In the speech, I called for regulators to collaborate and coordinate efforts to identify a responsible path for introducing responsible innovation in our markets.[11]
    A recent FSOC Report notes gaps in financial institutions’ cybersecurity preparedness, risk management, and business continuity practices with respect to AI. The report notes, “AI’s data intensity and higher complexity, as well as increased reliance on third-party vendors of AI technology can complicate the ability to fend off attacks.”[12] 
    The FSOC Report explains that “[c]yberthreat actors may also be able to use AI tools, such as generative AI, to enable attacks on the financial services sector, particularly through the use of social engineering, malware generation, vulnerability discovery, and disinformation. While these cyber attacks are neither new nor unique to AI, AI tools may make these attacks much easier for a less sophisticated adversary.”[13] In December 2024, the Treasury Department released an additional report on AI in financial services highlighting uses of AI by financial services firms. That report notes that “AI is widely used for cybersecurity risk management…including analyzing large sets of data, detecting anomalies, flagging suspicious activities, and verifying customer identities under Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) obligations” and goes on to note that “Generative AI has been deployed to complement an investigation platform in collating and summarizing data and automating report creation and filing. AI is also being used in compliance with risk management guidelines, including managing operational risks, meeting capital and liquidity standards, improving stress test scenarios, and enhancing forecasting accuracy.”[14]
    As agentic AI comes into focus, it may present new opportunities to build upon the systems that financial services firms may already be working on and enable these tools to be more tailored to their specific organizations. 
    As I continue to study these issues and engage with market participants, AI has increasingly been discussed as a potential mitigant to the very risks that the technology creates in other contexts. In fact, AI is being discussed not just as a potential benefit, but possibly a necessary element to fighting AI-driven cyberthreats. I am reminded of a saying I heard at a prior event on this topic, that firms need to be able to “fight fire with fire.” In my remarks in April, I encouraged regulators to focus on how we may be able to use AI to combat cybersecurity and fraud threats. In other words, AI may offer useful SupTech solutions to detect fraud and market manipulation.
    Market participants have already been using AI for compliance and supervision functions, and we may expect that number to increase. For example, the FSB Report notes that financial institutions are using AI for compliance with fraud and AML/CFT requirements in more and more varied use cases. The report notes that “[a]lthough the use of AI models to comply with AML/CFT requirements and to perform fraud detection were already identified in the 2017 report, they have been more widely deployed since then to facilitate investigations into sanctions evasion, to identify misuse of legal persons and legal arrangements, to uncover trade fraud and trade-based money laundering, and to detect tax evasion, fraud/scams, and money mules.”[15] The report discusses some enhanced benefits of generative AI, and our discussion today may show why agentic AI can even go a step further. Similarly,  a recent consultation report published by the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) on AI in capital markets reports from a survey of IOSCO members and self-regulatory organizations that market participants are not only using AI “to enhance the effectiveness of AML and CFT measures,” but in addition to other compliance uses, specifically using AI for cybersecurity, including “for vulnerability, threat, phishing, and anomaly detection; for automated response and authentication; in risk management and compliance surveillance activities; and to assist with the detection and prevention of frauds and scams.”[16]
    On the regulators’ side, there are also opportunities to use AI to enhance our ability to carry out our missions. The FSB Report notes that “Supervisory authorities’ use of SupTech has increased, with 59% of authorities surveyed using various applications in 2023, a 5- percentage point increase from 2022.”[17] With the data that it collects and its responsibilities for market oversight, it is easy to imagine how the CFTC could start to explore how SupTech could facilitate the agency in advancing many aspects of its mission.
    TPRM: Market Risks and Beyond
    As we hear from a truly impressive group of experts today about how some of these new technologies are being integrated into their organizations, and how at a micro and macro level these innovations may be capable of (and in some cases already have) changing how we operate or interact with different players in our markets, I would ask you to consider not just the big picture of what the technology or the outcome may be but what goes into making that happen. And in many cases, we will see that critical third-party vendors are an integral part of that – in some cases, the technology itself will come from a vendor, and in others, it may be an important input, such as data centers or cloud storage. It is important to highlight a number of potential risks that may relate to third-party risk management, such as concentration risk among a limited number of providers.[18] 
    As I have discussed previously, MRAC has been at the forefront of the Commission’s efforts to address the importance of cyber resilience for market participants, central counterparties and the broader market and economy. In March 2023, MRAC held a “first-of-its-kind” public meeting to discuss the cybersecurity event at ION Cleared Derivatives that led to a ripple effect across our markets. This was the first chance for experts across our industry to come together to evaluate the event as well as begin to map out next steps to ensure cyber preparedness among market participants, service providers, and other sources that have the potential to impact our markets. 
    After the March 2023 meeting, both the Commission and the MRAC got to work on addressing the cyber resilience of market participants. The Commission developed a proposed rule that would implement an operational resilience framework for futures commission merchants, swap dealers, and major swap participants, but did not focus on similar cyber risk in other areas, such as DCOs. The CCP Risk & Governance Committee took up the mantel where the Commission left off and developed recommendations that highlight the importance of cyber resilience in DCOs and the need for a more robust regulatory framework. These recommendations, which the MRAC voted to advance to the Commission, would expand upon the existing framework and require DCOs establish, implement and maintain a third-party relationship management program. 
    CFTC Rule 39.18, establishing system safeguard standards for DCOs, addresses outsourcing but does not expressly discuss third-party relationships; the CCP Risk and Governance recommendations would build upon the framework of Rule 39.18 by adding a third-party risk management program to (b)(2). The proposed language notes that “[a] robust TPRM program should identify, assess, mitigate and monitor the full scope of risks that the use of third party arrangements through implementation” at a minimum of certain enumerated principes, including, among other things, written policies and procedures that over the entire lifecycle of the third-party relationship, personnel with expertise to monitor the third-party service provider, onboarding and diligence before onboarding and exit strategies and alternatives before termination, risk-based monitoring, and more.[19] 
    The recommendations build upon the principle-based approach of the Core Principles as well as lessons learned and best practices from voices across the industry as well as international standard setting bodies. As noted in the report
    “These principles are intended to reflect lessons learned from industry efforts and best practices in derivatives, the guidance notes in Form DCO, the NFA interpretive guidance, lessons learned from the wider context of third-party relationship management, as well as the principles enunciated in the PFMIs. Incorporating these principles in Commission regulations would enable the Commission to update its regulatory framework with respect to critical third party service providers and to bring its regulations in line with internationally accepted standards, while maintaining a principles based approach to regulation.”[20]
    Cyber resilience is a critical gateway issue for protecting market integrity. At the risk of sounding like a broken record, I urge everyone to be thoughtful about these issues and what steps we can take to strengthen market participants and our broader derivatives and global financial markets. Effectively combatting cyber threats will require a coordinated effort among regulators and industry, and I believe there is a lot we can accomplish across a number of different areas, ranging from considering best practices for governance and effective risk management to leveraging technology through SupTech or RegTech innovations.
    Conclusion
    Reunion Tower stands tall and strong in Dallas largely because it is built on a solid foundation. As we think about integrating innovative technologies into our markets and as we focus on cyber resilience and third-party risk management, as well as the benefits and threats of AI-enhanced cybersecurity, I look forward to collaborating with different regulators, industry experts, and academics at roundtables and events like this one to continue to study these issues. My hope is that we can continue to advance a shared understanding of the risks and opportunities to develop best practices or to use these technologies to monitor and fight back against cyber threats.

    [10] See, e.g., U.S. Dep’t of the Treasury, Managing Artificial Intelligence-Specific Cybersecurity Risks in the Financial Services Sector (Mar. 2024), https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/136/Managing-Artificial-Intelligence-Specific-Cybersecurity-Risks-In-The-Financial-Services-Sector.pdf (Treasury Report); Financial Stability Oversight Council, Annual Report (Dec. 6, 2024), https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/261/FSOC2024AnnualReport.pdf (FSOC Report); Financial Stability Board, The Financial Stability Implications of Artificial Intelligence (Nov. 14, 2024), https://www.fsb.org/uploads/P14112024.pdf (FSB Report). 

    [12] FSOC Report at 86 (citation omitted).

    [15] FSB Report at 12 (citation omitted).

    [17] FSB Report at 13 (citing Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance (2023), Cambridge SupTech Lab: State of SupTech Report 2023).

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI: Medallion Bank Announces Redemption of Its Series F Preferred Stock

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    NEW YORK, May 29, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Medallion Bank (Nasdaq: MBNKP; MBNKO), an FDIC-insured bank providing consumer loans for the purchase of recreational vehicles, boats, and home improvements, along with loan origination services to fintech strategic partners, announced today that on July 1, 2025 (the “Redemption Date”) it will redeem all outstanding shares of its Fixed-to-Floating Rate Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series F (the “Series F Preferred Stock”) (Nasdaq: MBNKP) at the redemption price of $25.00 per share (the “Redemption Price”).

    Because the Redemption Date is a dividend payment date for the Series F Preferred Stock, the Redemption Price does not include declared and unpaid dividends. The regular quarterly dividend on the Series F Preferred Stock was separately declared and will be paid separately on July 1, 2025 to holders of record on the record date for such dividend payment in the customary manner.

    On and after the Redemption Date, the Series F Preferred Stock will no longer be deemed outstanding and dividends on the shares of Series F Preferred Stock will cease to accrue.

    All shares of Series F Preferred Stock are held in book-entry form through The Depository Trust Company (“DTC”) and will be redeemed in accordance with the procedures of DTC.

    Equiniti Trust Company, LLC is the transfer agent, registrar and redemption agent for the Series F Preferred Stock.

    Equiniti Trust Company, LLC’s address and telephone number are as follows:

    First Class/Registered/Certified
    Equiniti Trust Company, LLC
    Operations Center, Attn: Reorganization Department
    55 Challenger Road, Suite 200
    Ridgefield Park, New Jersey 07660
    718-921-8317

    Investors in the Series F Preferred Stock should contact the bank or broker through which they hold a beneficial interest in the Series F Preferred Stock for information about obtaining the Redemption Payment for the Series F Preferred Stock in which they have a beneficial interest.

    About Medallion Bank

    Medallion Bank specializes in providing consumer loans for the purchase of recreational vehicles, boats, and home improvements, along with loan origination services to fintech strategic partners. The Bank works directly with thousands of dealers, contractors and financial service providers serving their customers throughout the United States. Medallion Bank is a Utah-chartered, FDIC-insured industrial bank headquartered in Salt Lake City and is a wholly owned subsidiary of Medallion Financial Corp.

    Company Contact:
    Investor Relations
    212-328-2176
    InvestorRelations@medallion.com

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI: Central 1 reports first quarter 2025 financial results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    VANCOUVER, British Columbia, May 29, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Central 1 Credit Union (Central 1) today reported its 2025 first quarter performance reflecting continued strength in its core fee-based revenue streams and a one-time provision associated with the transfer of its Digital Banking business.

    “This quarter, we finalized activities to support the transition of the digital banking side of our business, including the transfer of some employees to Intellect Design,” said Sheila Vokey, President & CEO of Central 1. “We are focused on our role to deliver reliable payments through a centralized platform of new APIs, core investments and financial products through our treasury team, and as a connector to critical financial services partners and major banking hosts in Canada. Central 1 remains focused on delivering long-term value through ongoing innovation and operational stability.”

    First quarter 2025 compared with the first quarter 2024:

    • Net loss, inclusive of provision related to digital banking, was $24.0 million, compared with net income of $28.9 million.
    • Adjusted net income of $1.7 million, compared with $28.9 million.
    • Net interest income was $17.4 million, compared with $14.5 million.
    • Net fair value losses were $7.4 million, compared with net fair value gains of $34.5 million.
    • Return on average equity (ROE)1,2 of (2.3)%, compared with 3.8%. 
    • Adjusted ROE1,2 of 0.8%, compared with 3.8%.

    Adjusted net income in the current quarter excludes a provision of $35.1 million (pre-tax).

    Core Business Performance:

    Digital Banking
    In January 2025, Central 1 announced the transfer of digital banking operations to Intellect Design Arena Ltd. (Intellect), and the transaction closed February 28, 2025. Also during the quarter, Central 1 recognized a provision of $35.1 million related to the asset transfer and Central 1’s obligation to provide on-going access to its digital banking infrastructure to Intellect. Central 1 continues to work with Intellect and our clients to support clients’ transition to alternative digital banking providers within a three-to-four-year timeline.

    Treasury
    Treasury reported net income was $5.4 million for the quarter, reflecting the impact of challenging market conditions, including a broad-based widening of credit spreads and a shift in market sentiment. Widening credit spreads in response to the threat of higher tariffs resulted in unrealized losses on Treasury’s fixed income portfolio of $7.4 million. While these external factors influenced performance compared to the $34.6 million reported in the first quarter of the prior year, results were supported by an increase in net interest income, underscoring the strength and resilience of the core business operations.

    Payments
    Payments reported a net loss of $1.7 million for the quarter, compared to net income of $1.9 million in the same period last year. This loss reflects strategic investments to accelerate long-term growth, including the ongoing development of enhanced payment capabilities for both new and existing clients. As part of this forward-looking approach, non-interest expenses increased by $5.6 million year-over-year. Total revenue remained consistent with the prior year, highlighting a stable foundation as the division positions itself for future expansion.

    In February, Central 1 welcomed a new Chief Payments Officer, Barclay Hancock, who draws on his significant experience in payments across business and financial services to lead the business line as we continue to deliver reliable payments services through our centralized, modular platform of APIs. Central 1 continues to add API availability, including API access to our existing connections with all the major banking hosts in Canada — delivering payments transactions and banking host data for clients regardless of the digital banking provider they use.

    Central 1’s first quarter Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) and Financial Statements have been filed on Central 1’s SEDAR profile at www.sedarplus.com and are also available at www.central1.com/investor-relations

    Notes
    1.This is a non-GAAP financial ratio. Refer to the “Non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures” section of the MD&A for more information.

    2.When calculating the annualized return on average assets and annualized return on average equity, the onerous contract provision was treated as a non-recurring item and therefore was not annualized.

    About Central 1
    Central 1 cooperatively empowers credit unions and other financial institutions who deliver banking choice to Canadians. With assets of $10.8 billion as of March 31, 2025, Central 1 provides critical payments, treasury and clearing and settlement services at scale to enable a thriving credit union system. We do this by collaborating with our clients, developing strategies, products, and services to support the financial well-being of their more than 5 million diverse customers in communities across Canada. For more information, visit www.central1.com

    Caution Regarding Forward Looking Statements
    This press release and announcement contain historical and forward-looking statements. All statements other than statements of historical fact are or may be based on assumptions, uncertainties, and management’s best estimates of future events. Central 1 has based the forward-looking statements on current plans, information, data, estimates, expectations, and projections about, among other things, results of operations, financial condition, prospects, strategies and future events, and therefore undue reliance should not be placed on them. These include, without limitation, statements relating to our financial and non-financial performance objectives, vision and strategic goals and priorities, including focus on capital and cost management, the economic, market and regulatory review and outlook for the Canadian economy and the provincial economies in which our member credit unions operate , the impacts of external events such as international conflicts, protests, natural disasters or pandemics, as well as statements that contain the words “may,” “will,” “intends” and “anticipates” and other similar words and expressions.

    Forward-looking statements are based on the opinions and estimates of management at the date the statements are made. Actual results may differ materially from those currently anticipated. Securityholders are cautioned that such forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties. Certain important assumptions by Central 1 in making forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, competitive conditions, economic conditions and regulatory considerations. Important risk factors that could cause actual results and the timing of such results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements include economic risks, regulatory risks (including legislative and regulatory developments), risks and uncertainty from the impact of rising or falling interest rates, international conflicts, natural disasters or pandemics, geopolitical uncertainty, information technology and cyber risks, environmental and social risk (including climate change), digital disruption and innovation, reputation risk, competitive risk, privacy, data and third-party related risks, risks related to business and operations, risks relating to the transition of clients to alternative digital banking providers, and other risks detailed from time to time in Central 1’s periodic reports filed with securities regulators. Central 1 is subject to risks associated with evolving U.S. trade and tariff policies, inflationary pressures, interest rate volatility, and potential regulatory changes under the current U.S. administration. Shifts in tariff structures or global trade conditions may adversely affect our cost structure and overall operating environment. Given these risks, the reader is cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Central 1 undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by applicable laws.

    Contacts

    Media:
    Heather Merry
    Senior Manager, Communications
    Central 1 Credit Union
    T 1.800.661.6813 ext. 2355
    E communications@central1.com

    Investors:
    Brent Clode
    Chief Investment Officer
    Central 1 Credit Union
    905.282.8588 or 1.800.661.6813 ext. 8588
    E bclode@central1.com

    The MIL Network