Category: Canada

  • MIL-OSI Canada: Minister Olszewski approves emergency assistance to Inuit community in northern Quebec

    Source: Government of Canada News

    May 21, 2025 – Ottawa, Ontario – Today, the Honourable Eleanor Olszewski, Minister of Emergency Management and Community Resilience and Minister responsible for Prairies Economic Development Canada, issued the following statement:

    “A series of blizzards and structural fires left the Inuit community of Puvirnituq, in northern Quebec, without access to drinking water.

    On May 20, in my role as Minister of Emergency Management and Community Resilience, I approved a Request for Federal Assistance from the Government of Quebec, on behalf of the Kativik Regional Government, to support their efforts to distribute drinking water or other priority resources and provide logistical support to help the community manage the current situation. To this end, the Government Operations Centre is working with federal and provincial partners, including the Canadian Armed Forces, to coordinate the response to the situation in northern Quebec and mobilize all necessary federal resources.

    On behalf of all Canadians, I would like to express my sympathies to all of those affected by this difficult situation and thank all of those already working tirelessly to help resolve it. The Government of Canada will always be there to help in times of need.”

    Associated Links

    MIL OSI Canada News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Casten, Smith Demand DOJ Investigation Into Trump Crypto Dinner

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Representative Sean Casten (IL-06)

    May 22, 2025

    Washington, D.C. — U.S. Congressmen Sean Casten (IL-06) and Adam Smith (WA-09) led 35 House Democrats in a letter to the Department of Justice (DOJ) Public Integrity Section demanding DOJ immediately launch an investigation into whether President Donald Trump’s offer for top investors in his cryptocurrency token, $TRUMP, to join him at a private dinner violates federal bribery laws or the foreign emoluments clause of the Constitution.

    “We write to request an immediate investigation into President Trump’s offer for the top investors in his $TRUMP memecoin to attend a private dinner with him on May 22, 2025,” the lawmakers wrote. “This invites foreign influence over U.S. policy decisions and raises potential corruption and emoluments clause violations. It is just the latest example of President Trump disregarding ethics norms, introducing further conflicts of interest, and using his office for self-enrichment.”

    Days before the start of his second term, President Trump launched the $TRUMP memecoin. Its price quickly peaked at $75, before crashing and causing $2 billion in investor losses. In April, President Trump announced plans to invite $TRUMP’s top 220 investors to a private dinner, resulting in a 60% surge in price as investors rushed to accumulate enough value to qualify for a seat at the dinner. 

    The Trump family and its partners have earned more than $320 million in trading fees since $TRUMP was launched in January, including at least $1.35 million following the dinner announcement. Multiple investors have explicitly stated that they hoped to purchase influence with the president. 

    In addition, a Bloomberg investigation found that the majority of the top 25 memecoin holders are likely foreign nationals. The top spot is held by Justin Sun, a Chinese crypto entrepreneur who faced an SEC lawsuit alleging fraudulent market manipulation on his blockchain platform. The Trump Administration notably paused the legal action after Sun invested $30 million in one of President Trump’s other cryptocurrency ventures, the World Liberty Project. 

    “U.S. law prohibits foreign persons from contributing to U.S. political campaigns,” the lawmakers continued. “However, the $TRUMP memecoin, including the promotion of a dinner promising exclusive access to the President, opens the door for foreign governments to buy influence with the President, all without disclosing their identities.”

    The Foreign Emoluments Clause of the United States Constitution (Article I, Section 9, Clause 8) prohibits any federal government official, including the President, from accepting any benefit from a foreign government without the consent of Congress. It is critical that the DOJ conducts a nonpartisan investigation of President Trump’s private dinner.

    In addition to Reps. Casten and Smith, the letter was signed by Reps. Nanette Barragán, Joyce Beatty, Greg Casar, Yvette Clarke, Emanuel Cleaver, Cleo Fields, Bill Foster, Maxwell Frost, John Garamendi, Robert Garcia, Sylvia Garcia, Dan Goldman, Al Green, Jim Himes, Glenn Ivey, Marcy Kaptur, Sam Liccardo, Zoe Lofgren, Stephen Lynch, April McClain Delaney, Betty McCollum, Gregory Meeks, Dave Min, Brittany Pettersen, Brad Sherman, Shri Thanedar, Rashida Tlaib, Paul Tonko, Ritchie Torres, Juan Vargas, Nydia Velázquez, Bonnie Watson Coleman, and Nikema Williams.

    A copy of the letter can be found here. Text of the letter can be found below.

    Dear Acting Chief Sullivan:

    We write to request an immediate investigation into President Trump’s offer for the top investors in his $TRUMP memecoin to attend a private dinner with him on May 22, 2025. This invites foreign influence over U.S. policy decisions and raises potential corruption and emoluments clause violations. It is just the latest example of President Trump disregarding ethics norms, introducing further conflicts of interest, and using his office for self-enrichment.

    On April 23, 2025, a website connected to the Trump family, gettrumpmemes.com, announced that the top 220 investors in the $TRUMP memecoin would be invited to a gala dinner with President Trump on May 22, 2025, located at his golf course outside of Washington D.C. The top 25 buyers would get face time with the President at “an ultra-exclusive private VIP” reception before the dinner, as well as a “special” V.I.P. tour of the White House. And the top four investors would receive a limited-edition Trump-branded watch.

    President Trump promoted the event on social media as the “most EXCLUSIVE INVITATION in the world,” causing the price of the memecoin to surge more than 60 percent as investors rushed to accumulate enough coins to qualify for a dinner seat. Overall, the Trump family and its partners have earned more than $320 million in trading fees since the memecoin was launched in January, including at least $1.35 million following the dinner announcement, according to blockchain analytics firm Chainalysis.

    Investors spent more than $145 million on $TRUMP tokens over the duration of this contest, with some stating explicitly that they hoped to purchase influence with President Trump. For example, GD Culture Group, a small technology company that facilitates e-commerce for other businesses and brands on TikTok, recently announced plans to purchase $300 million worth of $TRUMP coins. And in the company’s own words, its Chinese subsidiary may be subject to “[intervention] or influence” by the Chinese government. GD Culture Group’s announcement came just days after President Trump indicated that he’d “be willing” to delay the statutorily required ban on TikTok in the U.S. past its June 19, 2025, deadline. Freight Technologies, a Houston-based company that specializes in U.S.-Mexico-Canada cross-border shipping, was even more direct about why it planned to purchase $20 million worth of President Trump’s memecoin: to help the company “advocate for fair, balanced, and free trade between Mexico and U.S.,” the company’s CEO said in a statement. After the contest closed, at least 34 of the top 220 investors sold most of their memecoin holdings, further confirming that the $TRUMP memecoin is not a worthwhile investment, but rather a vehicle to buy influence with the Trump Administration.

    The $TRUMP memecoin website displays a leaderboard of the winners whose identities remain largely unknown due to the anonymity of digital wallets. However, a Bloomberg analysis found that 19 of the top 25 memecoin holders are likely foreign nationals. Notably, Justin Sun, a Chinese billionaire who has privately touted his ties to the Chinese government and founded a blockchain network often used to finance illicit activities, confirmed that he held the top spot. He owned more than $18 million worth of the memecoin on May 12, 2025, when the contest ended. Since March 2023, Sun has been facing a lawsuit from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), alleging fraudulent market manipulation on his platform. This legal action was notably paused by the Trump administration after he invested $30 million in one of President Trump’s other cryptocurrency ventures. In what appears to be a quid pro quo move, Sun then invested an additional $45 million into President Trump’s World Liberty Project, while simultaneously increasing his holdings of the $TRUMP memecoin.

    Former Republican lawmakers, President Trump’s former aides, and cryptocurrency industry leaders recognize these national security risks and the opportunity for corruption. Charles Dent, the former chairman of the House Ethics Committee, recently stated that “ foreign entities and governments obviously want to curry favor with the president. This is completely out of bounds and raises all sorts of ethical, legal and constitutional issues that must be addressed.” Additionally, Anthony Scaramucci, a former official in the Trump administration, characterized President Trump’s memecoin as representing “Idi Amin level corruption.” Furthermore, Vitalik Buterin, a co-founder of Ethereum, emphasized that politician-backed coins “are vehicles for unlimited political bribery, including from foreign nation states.”

    U.S. law prohibits foreign persons from contributing to U.S. political campaigns. However, the $TRUMP memecoin, including the promotion of a dinner promising exclusive access to the President, opens the door for foreign governments to buy influence with the President, all without disclosing their identities.

    The Public Integrity Section was established in the aftermath of the Watergate scandal and exists to ensure that the Department of Justice conducts fair and thorough investigations into corruption by government officials at all levels, without regard to those officials’ political views or allegiances.

    We therefore urge you to launch an immediate inquiry to determine whether this dinner event violates the federal bribery statute or the foreign emoluments clause of the U.S. Constitution. If the Department of Justice concludes that it does, we ask that you set aside political considerations and pursue action to uphold public integrity and the rule of law.

    Thank you for your attention to this important matter.

    ###

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Global: Canada’s skills crisis is growing — here’s how we can fix it

    Source: The Conversation – Canada – By Stephen Murgatroyd, Instructor, Faculty of Education, University of Alberta

    Canada needs to rethink how to prepare Canadians for the workforce. (Shutterstock)

    Canada is facing a significant skills shortage. According to recent data, 77 per cent of Canadian businesses surveyed say they are unable to find suitably skilled candidates for the jobs they have available.

    Even among those who apply with relevant skills, 44 per cent don’t have the required level of proficiency to secure employment. At present, there are about 700,000 job vacancies across the country.

    This mismatch persists despite Canada having one of its largest-ever graduating classes — nearly 360,000 students from colleges, universities and trade schools.

    As labour shortages deepen across sectors, the disconnect between formal education and real-world job requirements is becoming harder to ignore.

    Skills shortage will likely worsen

    Canada’s skills shortage is expected to worsen in the coming years. Between now and 2028, 700,000 workers in the skilled trades are due to retire.

    Canada’s antiquated apprenticeship system is struggling to produce enough workers to fill this gap. It is slow, outdated and has low completion rates: just 32 per cent of male and 35 per cent of female candidates complete their training.

    Some employers are losing confidence in using qualifications as a basis for hiring.
    (Shutterstock)

    Completing an apprenticeship can take up to four years in Canada, while many other nations have much higher completion rates in two years or less.

    It is not just trades that Canada has challenges with. If current trends continue, Canada is projected to face a shortage of 100,000 nurses by 2030. Significant shortages are also expected in technology-related positions, construction engineering and K-12 education, where demand for teachers and school administrators is rising.

    Meanwhile, rising demand is expected for jobs related to artificial intelligence and advanced manufacturing and supply chain management.

    Rethinking how to prepare people for work

    Some employers are losing confidence in using qualifications as a basis for hiring. Increasingly, they feel degrees and diplomas don’t adequately prepare people for work.

    As a result, some organizations have moved to skills-based or competency-based hiring where candidates share skills portfolios and work testimonials to secure a position. As of 2024, approximately 80 per cent of Canadian companies have implemented some form of skills-based hiring practices, up from 74 per cent in 2023.




    Read more:
    Employers should use skill-based hiring to find hidden talent and address labour challenges


    Other companies, like Shopify, take candidates from high school and put them through custom programs designed to ensure they have the skills needed to work in a particular organization or industry.

    Colleges and universities have long been seen as the primary pipelines for skilled labour. But as employer expectations evolve, Canada needs to reconsider the role these institutions play in producing skilled workers.

    Simply expanding existing programs or opening new programs will not solve the underlying problem. What’s needed is a fundamental rethinking of how we prepare Canadians for the workforce.

    5 steps Canada should take

    Canada’s new government, in collaboration with provinces, territories and industry, needs to pursue a five-pronged strategy to address the country’s deepening skills crisis:

    1. Modernize the apprenticeship system.

    Canada must transition from a traditional, time-based apprenticeship model to a flexible, competency-based system. Instead of being tied to rigid journeyperson-to-apprentice ratios and multi-year timelines, learners should be able to demonstrate their skills on demand anywhere, anytime. The goal should be to reduce completion times to two years or less.

    Learning should be accessible through multiple formats, including workplace mentorship, YouTube tutorials, boot camps, micro-credentials and virtual labs. What matters is not where learning takes place, but whether a learner can demonstrate competence.

    Learners should be able to demonstrate their skills on demand anywhere, anytime.
    (Shutterstock)

    2. Accelerate skills recognition through micro-credentials.

    Canada should fast-track the adoption of micro-learning, stackable micro-credentials and competency-based certification. Micro-credentials are short, focused learning experiences that recognize specific skills or knowledge.

    In fields like IT, project management and supply chain management, many professionals succeed without formal academic degrees, instead relying on industry-recognized certifications.

    This model must expand into other sectors, especially health care, manufacturing and finance, where skills-based hiring could address labour shortages.

    3. Recognize informal and experiential learning.

    Millions of Canadians develop valuable skills through informal, self-directed and work-based learning.

    Yet Canada’s prior learning assessment and recognition systems, which convert informal learning into certified learning, remains fragmented, under-utilized and overly bureaucratic.

    Canada needs a nationally coherent, on-demand competency-based assessment system. Certified assessors should be able to validate individuals’ skills and link them to job profiles, occupational standards and credentials. This is not just an equity issue, but is an economic imperative. Other countries are much better at this than Canada is.

    4. Shorten and re-design post-secondary programs.

    The misalignment between program outcomes and labour market demands is well-documented. Closing this gap should be a top priority for post-secondary reform.

    Many college and university programs could be made shorter, more agile and more aligned with workforce needs — especially programs linked to workforce needs and skills in demand.

    Competency-based, work-integrated learning models that are designed with industry and delivered in two- or three-year formats could dramatically increase job readiness.

    5. Incentivize employer investment in upskilling and reskilling.

    Canada needs a stronger incentive framework for continuous learning. Canada’s training credit — a refundable tax credit that helps offset the cost of eligible training fees — helps some individuals, but employers still view training as a cost rather than a driver of productivity, retention and competitiveness.

    A new approach should include tax incentives for employers and employees investing in learning; co-funded, industry-led training partnerships; industry-sponsored micro-credentials; and public recognition for employers who demonstrate leadership in workforce development.

    Canada cannot meet today’s workforce challenges with outdated systems and thinking. Doing more of the same and expecting different results is no longer an option. What is needed is evidence-informed and future-focused reforms that prioritize skills, flexibility and inclusion.

    Stephen Murgatroyd does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. Canada’s skills crisis is growing — here’s how we can fix it – https://theconversation.com/canadas-skills-crisis-is-growing-heres-how-we-can-fix-it-256864

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI USA: Smith, Casten Demand DOJ Investigation Into Trump Crypto Dinner

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Adam Smith (9th District of Washington)

    WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Congressmen Adam Smith (WA-09) and Sean Casten (IL-06) led 35 House Democrats in a letter to the Department of Justice (DOJ) Public Integrity Section demanding DOJ immediately launch an investigation into whether President Donald Trump’s offer for top investors in his cryptocurrency token, $TRUMP, to join him at a private dinner violates federal bribery laws or the foreign emoluments clause of the Constitution.
     
    “We write to request an immediate investigation into President Trump’s offer for the top investors in his $TRUMP memecoin to attend a private dinner with him on May 22, 2025,” the lawmakers wrote. “This invites foreign influence over U.S. policy decisions and raises potential corruption and emoluments clause violations. It is just the latest example of President Trump disregarding ethics norms, introducing further conflicts of interest, and using his office for self-enrichment.”
     
    Days before the start of his second term, President Trump launched the $TRUMP memecoin. Its price quickly peaked at $75, before crashing and causing $2 billion in investor losses. In April, President Trump announced plans to invite $TRUMP’s top 220 investors to a private dinner, resulting in a 60% surge in price as investors rushed to accumulate enough value to qualify for a seat at the dinner. 
     
    The Trump family and its partners have earned more than $320 million in trading fees since $TRUMP was launched in January, including at least $1.35 million following the dinner announcement. Multiple investors have explicitly stated that they hoped to purchase influence with the president. 
     
    “U.S. law prohibits foreign persons from contributing to U.S. political campaigns,” the lawmakers continued. “However, the $TRUMP memecoin, including the promotion of a dinner promising exclusive access to the President, opens the door for foreign governments to buy influence with the President, all without disclosing their identities.”
     
    In addition, a Bloomberg investigation found that the majority of the top 25 memecoin holders are likely foreign nationals. The top spot is held by Justin Sun, a Chinese crypto entrepreneur who faced an SEC lawsuit alleging fraudulent market manipulation on his blockchain platform. This Trump Administration notably paused the legal action after Sun invested $30 million in one of President Trump’s other cryptocurrency ventures, the World Liberty Project. 
     
    The Foreign Emoluments Clause of the United States Constitution (Article I, Section 9, Clause 8) prohibits any federal government official, including the President, from accepting any benefit from a foreign government without the consent of Congress. It is critical that the DOJ conducts a nonpartisan investigation of President Trump’s private dinner.
     
    A copy of the letter can be found here. Text of the letter can be found below.
     
    Dear Acting Chief Sullivan:
     
    We write to request an immediate investigation into President Trump’s offer for the top investors in his $TRUMP memecoin to attend a private dinner with him on May 22, 2025. This invites foreign influence over U.S. policy decisions and raises potential corruption and emoluments clause violations. It is just the latest example of President Trump disregarding ethics norms, introducing further conflicts of interest, and using his office for self-enrichment.
     
    On April 23, 2025, a website connected to the Trump family, gettrumpmemes.com, announced that the top 220 investors in the $TRUMP memecoin would be invited to a gala dinner with President Trump on May 22, 2025, located at his golf course outside of Washington D.C. The top 25 buyers would get face time with the President at “an ultra-exclusive private VIP” reception before the dinner, as well as a “special” V.I.P. tour of the White House. And the top four investors would receive a limited-edition Trump-branded watch.
     
    President Trump promoted the event on social media as the “most EXCLUSIVE INVITATION in the world,” causing the price of the memecoin to surge more than 60 percent as investors rushed to accumulate enough coins to qualify for a dinner seat. Overall, the Trump family and its partners have earned more than $320 million in trading fees since the memecoin was launched in January, including at least $1.35 million following the dinner announcement, according to blockchain analytics firm Chainalysis.
     
    Investors spent more than $145 million on $TRUMP tokens over the duration of this contest, with some stating explicitly that they hoped to purchase influence with President Trump. For example, GD Culture Group, a small technology company that facilitates e-commerce for other businesses and brands on TikTok, recently announced plans to purchase $300 million worth of $TRUMP coins. And in the company’s own words, its Chinese subsidiary may be subject to “[intervention] or influence” by the Chinese government. GD Culture Group’s announcement came just days after President Trump indicated that he’d “be willing” to delay the statutorily required ban on TikTok in the U.S. past its June 19, 2025, deadline. Freight Technologies, a Houston-based company that specializes in U.S.-Mexico-Canada cross-border shipping, was even more direct about why it planned to purchase $20 million worth of President Trump’s memecoin: to help the company “advocate for fair, balanced, and free trade between Mexico and U.S.,” the company’s CEO said in a statement. After the contest closed, at least 34 of the top 220 investors sold most of their memecoin holdings, further confirming that the $TRUMP memecoin is not a worthwhile investment, but rather a vehicle to buy influence with the Trump Administration.
     
    The $TRUMP memecoin website displays a leaderboard of the winners whose identities remain largely unknown due to the anonymity of digital wallets. However, a Bloomberg analysis found that 19 of the top 25 memecoin holders are likely foreign nationals. Notably, an account named “Sun” held the top spot and owned more than $18 million worth of the memecoin on May 12, 2025, when the contest ended. Investigations into this account have traced it back to Justin Sun, a Chinese billionaire who has privately touted his ties to the Chinese government and founded a blockchain network often used to finance illicit activities. Since March 2023, Sun has been facing a lawsuit from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), alleging fraudulent market manipulation on his platform. This legal action was notably paused by the Trump administration after he invested $30 million in one of President Trump’s other cryptocurrency ventures. In what appears to be a quid pro quo move, Sun then invested an additional $45 million into President Trump’s World Liberty Project, while simultaneously increasing his holdings of the $TRUMP memecoin.
     
    Former Republican lawmakers, President Trump’s former aides, and cryptocurrency industry leaders recognize these national security risks and the opportunity for corruption. Charles Dent, the former chairman of the House Ethics Committee, recently stated that “ foreign entities and governments obviously want to curry favor with the president. This is completely out of bounds and raises all sorts of ethical, legal and constitutional issues that must be addressed.” Additionally, Anthony Scaramucci, a former official in the Trump administration, characterized President Trump’s memecoin as representing “Idi Amin level corruption.” Furthermore, Vitalik Buterin, a co-founder of Ethereum, emphasized that politician-backed coins “are vehicles for unlimited political bribery, including from foreign nation states.”
     
    U.S. law prohibits foreign persons from contributing to U.S. political campaigns. However, the $TRUMP memecoin, including the promotion of a dinner promising exclusive access to the President, opens the door for foreign governments to buy influence with the President, all without disclosing their identities.
     
    The Public Integrity Section was established in the aftermath of the Watergate scandal and exists to ensure that the Department of Justice conducts fair and thorough investigations into corruption by government officials at all levels, without regard to those officials’ political views or allegiances.
     
    We therefore urge you to launch an immediate inquiry to determine whether this dinner event violates the federal bribery statute or the foreign emoluments clause of the U.S. Constitution. If the Department of Justice concludes that it does, we ask that you set aside political considerations and pursue action to uphold public integrity and the rule of law.
     
    Thank you for your attention to this important matter.
     
    Sincerely,
     
    ###
     

    ###

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI: Final Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Octopus Apollo VCT plc
    Final Results

    Octopus Apollo VCT plc today announces the final results for the year ended 31 January 2025.

    Octopus Apollo VCT plc (‘Apollo’ or the ‘Company’) is a Venture Capital Trust (VCT) which aims to provide shareholders with attractive tax-free dividends and long-term capital growth by investing in a diverse portfolio of predominantly unquoted companies.

    The Company is managed by Octopus Investments Limited (‘Octopus’ or the ‘Portfolio Manager’) via its investment team, Octopus Ventures.

    HIGHLIGHTS

      Year to
    31 January 2025
    Year to
    31 January 2024
    Net assets (£’000) £482,563 £390,294
    Profit/(loss) after tax (£’000) £24,110 £(435)
    Net asset value (NAV) per share1 50.5p 50.5p
    Cumulative dividends paid since launch 90.0p 87.4p
    Total value per share2 140.5p 137.9p
    Dividends paid in the year 2.6p 2.7p
    Dividend yield3 5.1% 5.1%
    Dividend declared 1.3p 1.3p
    Total return per share %4 5.1% 0.0%
    1. NAV per share is calculated as net assets divided by total number of shares, as described in the glossary of terms.
    2. Total value per share is calculated by adding together NAV per share and cumulative dividends paid since launch.
    3. Dividend yield is calculated as dividends paid in the period, divided by the NAV per share at the beginning of the period.
    4. Total return per share % is an alternative performance measure (APM) calculated as movement in NAV per share in the period plus dividends paid in the period, divided by the NAV per share at the beginning of the period, as described in the glossary of terms.

    CHAIR’S STATEMENT

    Highlights

    • Apollo’s latest fundraise: £75 million
    • Total return over five years: 45.3%
    • Dividends paid in 2025: 2.6p

    Apollo’s total return for the year to 31 January 2025 was 5.1% with the net assets at the end of the period totalling £483 million.

    Performance

    I am pleased to present the annual results for Apollo for the year ended 31 January 2025. The NAV plus cumulative dividends per share at 31 January 2025 was 140.5p, an increase of 2.6p per share from 31 January 2024. During the year the NAV per share remained stable at 50.5p which represents, after adding back the 2.6p of dividends paid in the year, a total return for the year of 5.1% compared to 0% in the previous year. This outcome highlights the Company’s overall resilience and positive performance, despite the uncertain macro environment. I also note several exciting new investments have been made in the period, showing that the Company is successfully growing the overall size of the portfolio.

    In the twelve months to 31 January 2025, we utilised £86.1 million of our cash resources, comprising £47.1 million in new and follow-on investments, £17.8 million in dividends (net of the Dividend Reinvestment Scheme (DRIS)), £8.6 million in management fees, £9.0 million in share buybacks, and £3.6 million in other running costs such as accounting and administration services and trail commissions. The cash and liquid resources balance of £95.7 million at 31 January 2025 represented 19.8% of net assets at that date, compared to £61.3 million, which represented 15.7% at 31 January 2024. Cash and liquid resources comprises cash at bank, money market funds (MMFs) and open ended investment companies (OEICs.)

    Performance incentive fees
    Apollo’s performance since 31 January 2024 has given rise to a performance fee being payable to Octopus of £6.1 million. The performance fee is calculated as 20% on all gains above the High-Water Mark, the highest total return as at previous year ends, of 137.9p as at 31 January 2024.

    Dividends
    It is your Board’s policy to maintain a regular dividend flow where possible to take advantage of the tax-free distributions a VCT can provide, and work towards the targeted 5% annual dividend yield policy.

    I am pleased to confirm that the Board declared a second interim dividend of 1.3p per share in respect of the year ended 31 January 2025. This second interim dividend, in addition to the 1.3p per share interim dividend paid in December 2024 brings the total dividends declared to 2.6p per share in respect of the year ended 31 January 2025. The dividend was paid on 8 May 2025 to shareholders on the register at 22 April 2025. Since inception, we have paid a total of 91.3p in tax-free dividends per share, comprising 90.0p in previous distributions and an additional 1.3p paid in May. Considering dividends paid during 2024 (totalling 2.6p), the total dividend yield for the year is 5.1%, therefore meeting the Company’s target.

    Apollo’s DRIS was introduced in November 2014 and currently 20.7% of shareholders take advantage of it as it is an attractive scheme for investors who would prefer to benefit from additional income tax relief on their reinvested dividend. I hope that shareholders will find this scheme beneficial. During the year to 31 January 2025, 10,800,892 shares were issued under the DRIS, equating to a reinvested amount of £5.3 million.

    Fundraise and share buybacks
    On 19 March 2024, the Company closed its offer to raise £50 million, which led the Board to increase the offer by a further £35 million. I am pleased to report that we successfully raised the full £85 million, closing the offer on 24 September 2024.

    Following on from this, on 23 October 2024, the Company launched an offer to raise a further £50 million with an over-allotment facility for a further £25 million. I am delighted to report that we raised the full £75 million, so the offer closed fully subscribed on 21 March 2025. We would like to take this opportunity to welcome all new shareholders and thank all existing shareholders for their continued support.

    Apollo has continued to buy back and cancel shares as required. Subject to shareholder approval of resolution 10 at the forthcoming Annual General Meeting (AGM), this facility will remain in place to provide liquidity to investors who may wish to sell their shares, subject to the Board’s discretion. Details of the share buybacks undertaken during the year can be found in the Directors’ Report.

    Dividends, whether paid in cash or reinvested under the DRIS, and share buybacks are always at the discretion of the Board, are never guaranteed and may be reviewed when necessary.

    VCT sunset clause
    In November 2023, a ten-year extension was announced to the ‘sunset clause’ (a retirement date for the VCT scheme), meaning VCT tax reliefs will be available until 5 April 2035. This extension passed through Parliament in February 2024 and on 3 September 2024 His Majesty’s Treasury brought the extension into effect through The Finance Act 2024.

    Board of Directors
    Alex Hambro, having originally been appointed to the Board of Octopus Eclipse VCT 3 and 4 PLC in 2005, and then continuing as a Director following the merger with the Octopus Apollo VCTs in 2016, has decided to retire from the Board and will not be seeking re-election at the forthcoming AGM. It has been a pleasure to work with Alex, and I would like to take this opportunity to thank him on behalf of the Board and the shareholders for his substantial contribution over the years and help in guiding Apollo through its different phases of growth.

    A new Non-Executive Director will be appointed at the completion of a structured recruitment process, which is already underway. All the other Directors have indicated their willingness to remain on the Board, and both Chris Powles and Gillian Elcock will be seeking re-election at the AGM.

    Alternative Investment Fund (AIF)
    As announced on 30 September 2024, the Company is now classified as a full scope AIF under the European Union’s AIF Managers Directive (AIFMD). This is due to the Company’s success and continued growth in assets under management (AUM). This regulation is in place to ensure greater transparency and risk mitigation to protect investors. It is an exciting milestone for the Company, and the Board is working closely with Octopus to ensure all reporting requirements and management protocols are adopted.

    Portfolio Manager
    As reported in the half-yearly unaudited report, Richard Court (previously Apollo’s Lead Fund Manager), took on a new role in the period as Head of VCTs and Enterprise Investment Schemes (EIS) at Octopus Ventures. Paul Davidson, a Partner in the Octopus Ventures team, has replaced Richard as Lead Fund Manager as of September 2024. Paul brings with him eight years of experience, focusing on Apollo, and has worked closely with the Board (alongside Richard) for the last three years. The Board would like to take this opportunity to reiterate its congratulations to Paul on his new role and to again thank Richard for his contribution to the Company and wish him well in his new position. In January 2025, Erin Platts was appointed as new Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Octopus Ventures.

    AGM
    The AGM will be held on 10 July 2025 at 10am. Full details of the business to be conducted at the AGM are given in the Notice of the Meeting. We will have a Portfolio Manager’s update at the AGM, supported by a filmed update from the Portfolio Manager which will be available on the website at https://octopusinvestments.com/apollovct/.

    Shareholders’ views are important, and the Board encourages shareholders to vote on the resolutions by using the proxy form, or electronically at www.investorcentre.co.uk/eproxy.

    The Board has carefully considered the business to be approved at the AGM and recommends shareholders vote in favour of all the resolutions being proposed.

    Outlook
    I am pleased with the positive performance over the last six months, especially whilst the geo-political and economic landscape has been extremely challenging for portfolio companies to navigate. The uncertain conditions which have prevailed for the last couple of years have meant we have seen portfolio companies’ growth rates slow as trading conditions have become tougher and sales cycles have become more protracted. Companies have also looked to reduce their cash burn and focus on achieving profitability due to the scarcity and higher cost of capital. Some protection against these external factors has been offered by the contracted recurring revenue models that businesses within the portfolio have.

    Over the past 12 months, we have observed a recovery in the Company’s investment rate, with twice as many new investments being completed when comparing 2025/24 to 2024/23.. Market data supports this trend, showing more deals completed in the Series B and onwards space in 2024 compared to the prior year¹. The investment team is experiencing an increase in deal flow, especially in the last six months of 2024, and the current pipeline of opportunities looks very promising. In addition to the higher deal cadence, we are pleased that the Company concluded three profitable realisations, compared to one in the prior year.

    VCTs have long provided a compelling opportunity for UK investors to invest in businesses in a tax-efficient way, and we look forward to Apollo continuing to do so in the coming year. I would like to conclude by thanking both the Board and the Octopus team on behalf of all shareholders for their hard work.

    Murray Steele
    Chair

    ¹ https://carta.com/uk/en/data/vc-concentration-2024/

    PORTFOLIO MANAGER’S REVIEW

    At Octopus our focus is on managing your investments and providing open communication. Our annual and half-year updates are designed to keep you informed about the progress of your investment.

    Investment strategy
    In general, we invest in technology companies in the SaaS space that have recurring revenues from a diverse base of customers. We also seek to invest in companies that will provide an opportunity for Apollo to realise its investment typically within three to seven years.

    Apollo total value growth
    The total value has seen a significant increase over the five years from 119.8p to 140.5p at 31 January 2025. This increase in total value of 20.7p represents a 45.3% increase on the NAV of 45.7p as at 31 January 2020. Over the last five years, a total of more than £92.4 million has also been distributed back to shareholders in the form of tax-free dividends. This includes dividends reinvested as part of the DRIS.

    Focus on performance
    In the year to 31 January 2025, the NAV total return (NAV plus cumulative dividends) increased to 140.5p per share, giving a total return of 5.1% for the period. We are pleased with this modest uplift in total value, considering the challenging macroeconomic backdrop that our portfolio companies continued to navigate their way through over the last 12 months.

    The performance over the five years to 31 January 2025 is shown below:

    Year Ended NAV Dividends paid in year Cumulative
    dividends
    NAV + cumulative dividends Total return %
    31 January 2021 49.2p 2.3p 76.4p 125.6p 12.7%
    31 January 2022 50.2p 5.7p 82.1p 132.3p 13.6%
    31 January 2023 53.2p 2.6p 84.7p 137.9p 11.2%
    31 January 2024 50.5p 2.7p 87.4p 137.9p 0.0%
    31 January 2025 50.5p 2.6p 90.0p 140.5p 5.1%

    Over the year, including disposals, there have been valuation increases across 29 portfolio companies, delivering a collective increase of £62 million. These increases reflect businesses which have successfully managed to grow revenues through the period. The strongest performers have generally exhibited improving profitability levels and revenue growth from their customer base and some of the top performers include Definely, Lodgify and TRI.

    Conversely, 20 companies saw a decrease in valuation, collectively totalling £23 million. The businesses that saw the most significant reductions were Edge10, Synchtank and Peak Data. Growth has decelerated or in some cases revenues have declined in several portfolio companies and they have experienced decreases in their valuation. This has mainly been due to continued challenges in selling their software products into corporates who have experienced declining software expense budgets. There have also been some company-specific performance issues impacting a small number of companies in the portfolio.

    In aggregate, this resulted in a net increase in portfolio company valuations of £39 million.

    As part of ongoing liquidity management, Apollo regularly invests in and withdraws from MMFs in order to meet cash requirements. During the year, an additional £35.6 million (including interest) was invested in MMFs. Apollo also holds an investment in the Sequoia Economic Infrastructure Fund (SEQI), but no further investment was made in this fund during the year. These investments, in combination with the previously held investments in SEQI and the MMFs, took the total liquid investments as at 31 January 2025 to £91.5 million (including interest earned during the year on MMF deposits).

    Disposals
    Three profitable disposals were completed in the year. All of these investments were made prior to the change of investment focus to B2B SaaS businesses. The first exit was Dyscova Ltd (trading as Care & Independence (C&I)) which was acquired by GBUK Group, a company which designs, develops and distributes a portfolio of own and third-party branded acute-setting medical devices. Apollo first invested in C&I in 2016 and the exit resulted in Apollo achieving a 1.7x total return on its investment.

    In September 2024, we were pleased to exit our holding in Countrywide Healthcare Supplies Holdings which was acquired by Personnel Hygiene Services Ltd, a hygiene services provider. The Company first invested in 2014, and the exit resulted in a 4.4x return on our initial investment, which is an excellent outcome.

    In November 2024, nCino, a cloud-based software company that provides a platform for financial institutions to manage their business, acquired FullCircl. This acquisition will enhance nCino’s data and automation capabilities and allow it to expand its reach across the UK and Europe. Apollo made its initial investment in 2011, and the disposal resulted in a positive return for the Company.

    One disposal during the year resulted in a partial loss on investment when Ryte GmbH, a marketing software technology platform, was acquired by Semrush Holdings Inc. Two companies were placed into administration in the year, Rotolight and Origami Energy. However, given the underlying holding valuations of these companies at the time of them going into administration, this did not have a material impact on the Company’s performance during the year. In aggregate, the investment cost of the companies placed into administration totalled £5.3 million. The underperformance of a portfolio company is always disappointing for Apollo and shareholders alike, but it is an inevitable feature of a venture capital portfolio, and we believe that successful exits will continue to outweigh any losses that could arise over the medium to long term of managing the portfolio. In the year, all disposals, including loan repayments, collectively returned £21.7 million in cash to Apollo, with the aggregate investment cost totalling £15.4 million.

      Year ended 31 January 2021 Year ended 31 January 2022 Year ended 31 January 2023 Year ended 31 January 2024 Year ended 31 January 2025 Total
    Dividends paid in the year (£’000) 7,471 28,3661 14,323 19,165 23,097 92,423
    Disposal proceeds (£’000) 3,356 53,939 3,591 18,292 21,713 100,981

    1 Dividends paid to shareholders in the year ended 31 January 2022, including a special dividend of 3.1p per share.

    As illustrated in the table above, we are pleased to have paid dividends from disposal proceeds over the past five years. The nature and timing of realising investments in a venture capital portfolio means it can affect our ability to do so. The Company also tries to maximise the outcome of the underlying holdings in an exit scenario which may not always align with a specific financial period.

    New and follow-on investments
    During the year, in-line with the broader private capital market, the Company demonstrated increasing new investment activity with Apollo investing £34.1 million into eight new opportunities (this includes second tranches of prior year new investments) as compared to four new investments completing in the prior year, totalling £15.2 million. For follow-on investments, we also saw an increased number with £13 million being invested into nine companies compared to seven follow-on investments completing in the year to 31 January 2024 adding up to £17.8 million invested.

    Apollo’s new investments were in several exciting B2B software companies operating in a variety of end-markets:

    • Definely £2.8 million – An AI based legal tech software company supporting legal professionals in drafting and reviewing contractual documentation.
    • Switchee £2.5 million – A smart thermostat hardware and software provider focused on social housing and housing associations.
    • Cambri £4.2 million – An insights software platform that increases the quality, speed and cost effectiveness of producing research for new product launches.
    • Vyntelligence £4.5 million – A video intelligence and AI-driven data capture platform addressing inefficiencies in communication, reporting, and operational workflows within large infrastructure sectors.
    • Semble £2.5 million – An all-in-one platform for healthcare practices, enhancing patient care and streamlining operations.
    • bsport £8.4 million – An all-in-one software platform designed to manage boutique fitness and wellness studios.
    • Threatmark £6.1 million – A fraud prevention platform that uses real-time behavioural data to accurately identify payment fraud.

    Q&A
    How do we think about exiting our positions?
    In traditional venture capital, a relatively small number of investments generate a significant proportion of the fund’s performance. However, for Apollo we try to construct a portfolio where the majority of the portfolio delivers the majority of the Company’s performance. The investment team takes an active role to try and optimise each specific situation. This means we have certain situations where companies may be held for longer if we think it is in the best interest of investors and the Company. Conversely, there are other situations where we may seek to exit earlier if market conditions permit. This means we maintain good portfolio management discipline to make sure realised proceeds materially contribute towards financing the Company’s ongoing running costs and meeting its dividends targets.

    Private markets are illiquid, and as a result, the opportunities to sell all or some of our holding in a particular company can be unpredictable and governed by prevailing market conditions. We work closely with each portfolio company to understand and optimise its growth plans, with the goal of it maintaining flexibility over exit timing with the best interests of its shareholders in mind.

    Wider macroeconomic conditions often influence exits as much as company specific factors. We also recognise that timing may not always be right to exit a position, and patience can allow for greater value growth. In such cases, we will continue to support portfolio companies, stay alert to opportunities, and help create them proactively through our network.

    When do we start to think about exits?
    We look to understand who the likely acquirers are from the outset and throughout the holding period. This can help inform important strategic decisions which contribute to value creation for shareholders. It is healthy for our portfolio companies to maintain relationships with key potential acquirers. These can often be commercial partners before becoming acquirers, and as such this activity can be highly productive.

    We know not all companies will be as successful as we hoped at the time of the initial investment. We therefore seek to realise investments in companies which are underperforming and unlikely to generate a meaningful return. It can also help to find a “soft landing” for the company’s employees where the alternative may be placing the business into administration. However, to date this has only been in a very small minority of cases. Although generally not meaningful to investor returns, our behaviour in these scenarios is important.

    How do we work with portfolio company boards?
    We believe that it is important to be an active and supportive investor, so we typically appoint a Non-Executive Director or observer to the board of our portfolio companies. This allows us to offer ongoing support at the top level of the business and be involved in key decisions. It also gives us the opportunity to share any expertise and insights that we may have. Even very experienced founders may only sell a business once or twice in their career, whereas as investors, we may be involved in a few such transactions each year. We therefore look to support our portfolio companies by sharing the learnings and experience gathered across our team, all with the objective of obtaining the best outcome for our investors and shareholders in the Company overall.

    Valuations
    The table below illustrates the distribution of valuation methodologies used across Apollo’s B2B software investments (shown as a percentage of portfolio value and number of companies). B2B software accounts for 99% of Apollo’s total fixed asset investments. Methodologies include:
    • ‘External price’ includes valuations based on funding rounds that typically completed by the year end or shortly after the year end, and exits of companies where terms have been agreed or proposed with an acquirer;
    • ‘Multiples’ is predominantly used for valuations that are based on a multiple of revenue or EBITDA for portfolio companies; • ‘Scenario analysis’ is utilised where there is uncertainty around the potential outcomes available to a company, so a probability-weighted scenario analysis is considered.

    Having arrived at a valuation of the portfolio company, to distribute the equity value within a portfolio company’s capital structure, taking into account the priority of financial instruments and the economic rights of debt and shares Apollo holds, the Current Value Method (CVM) is typically employed. This method allocates the equity value to different equity interests as if the business were sold on the reporting date, thereby reflecting the effects of the distribution waterfall.

    Valuation methodology By value By number of companies
    Multiples 77% 64%
    Scenario analysis 18% 22%
    External price 5% 8%
    Write-off 6%

    Case studies
    definely
    definely.com
    LegalTech solution helping lawyers at every pre-execution stage of the contract lifecycle

    • 40,000 active users
    • top 25 of the prestigious Deloitte UK Technology Fast50
    • 75 employees located globally

    Definely, founded in 2020, is a UK LegalTech company created to make legal documents easier to read, edit and understand. Definely was founded by two former Magic Circle lawyers, one of whom is registered blind. They set out to make legal documents more accessible to those with visual impairments and soon realised that their solution solved a problem faced by all lawyers, daily. Headquartered in London, it has over 75 employees located globally.

    Fuelled by investment from Apollo, the company is now focused on adding to its existing base of 40,000 active users from the largest companies and law firms in the UK, US, Canada and Australia. In 2023, the company was named in the top 25 of the prestigious Deloitte UK Technology Fast50. Customers include AO Shearman, Slaughter and May, Dentons and Deloitte.

    Cambri
    cambri.io
    Helping brands innovate iteratively to bring successful products to market fast

    • 80% prediction accuracy for product launch success
    • 68% year-over-year ARR growth

    Cambri is an AI consumer insights and innovation platform which addresses a major industry problem – that of the high failure rate of product launches. Traditional market research, consumer insights, and prediction models are outdated, static, and notoriously inaccurate, typically delivering just 40% prediction accuracy. This means brands waste time and resources developing and launching products that consumers don’t need. By contrast, Cambri’s proprietary AI engine predicts the likelihood of a product’s success and provides actionable insights to help improve products before launch.

    Cambri’s AI models are two to three times more accurate than traditional methods, enabling its customers to regularly achieve over 80% prediction accuracy for product launch success – contributing to Cambri’s 68% year-over-year annual recurring revenue (ARR) growth. Household food and beverage brands such as Coca-Cola and Nestle already utilise the platform.

    Top 10 investments by value as at 31 January 2025
    Here, we set out the cost and valuation of the top ten holdings, which account for over 57% of the value of the portfolio.

      Portfolio: Investment cost (£’000) Fair value of investment (£’000)
    1 Natterbox £18,990 £44,419
    2 Lodgify £12,611 £33,912
    3 Ubisecure £9,075 £25,811
    4 Tri £3,800 £22,070
    5 Interact £308 £20,658
    6 Sova £12,250 £19,266
    7 FableData £8,600 £15,780
    8 ValueBlue £10,071 £15,031
    9 MentionMe £15,000 £15,000
    10 FuseUniversal £8,000 £14,394

    Top 10
    1
    N2JB Limited (trading as Natterbox)

    Natterbox is a London-based provider of business-to-business cloud telephone services that are uniquely integrated into Customer Resource Management (CRM) software platforms, most notably Salesforce.

    www.natterbox.com

    Investment date: March 2018
    Equity held: 9.0%
    (2024: 8.5%)
    Valuation basis: Revenue multiple
    Income received in year to 31 January 2025: £177,000
    (2024: £150,000)
    Last submitted accounts: 31 December 2023
    Consolidated turnover: £19,289,000
    (2022: £17,092,000)
    Consolidated loss before tax: £(644,000)
    (2022: £(2,568,000))
    Consolidated net assets: £646,000
    (2022: £1,022,000)

    2
    Codebay Solutions Limited (trading as Lodgify)
    Lodgify provides a SaaS platform for vacation rental hosts and property managers to manage their business and process their bookings.

    www.lodgify.com

    Investment date: September 2022
    Equity held: 15.3%
    (2024: 11.9%)
    Valuation basis: Revenue multiple
    Income received in year to 31 January 2025: n/a
    (2024: n/a)
    Last submitted accounts: 31 December 2023
    Consolidated turnover: €14,508,000
    (2022: €9,315,000)
    Consolidated loss before tax: €(7,462,000)
    (2022: €(6,239,000))
    Consolidated net assets: €10,390,000
    (2022: €16,946,000)

    3

    Ubisecure Holdings Limited
    Ubisecure is a provider of customer identity access management software.

    www.ubisecure.com

    Investment date: May 2018
    Equity held: 73.4%
    (2024: 33.3%)
    Valuation basis: Revenue multiple
    Income received in year to 31 January 2025: £179,000
    (2024: £197,000)
    Last submitted accounts: 31 December 2023
    Consolidated turnover: £8,674,000
    (2022: £6,923,000)
    Consolidated loss before tax: £(3,091,000)
    (2022: £(2,135,000)
    Consolidated net liabilities: £(3,053,000)
    (2022: £(287,000))

    4
    Triumph Holdings Limited (TRI)
    TRI has developed a risk based quality management and monitoring platform for the life sciences industry

    www.tritrials.com

    Investment date: October 2018
    Equity held: 52.0%
    (2024: 52.0%)
    Valuation basis: Revenue multiple
    Income received in year to 31 January 2025: £174,000
    (2023: £171,000)
    Last submitted accounts: 31 December 2023
    Consolidated turnover: Not available1
    (2022: Not available1)
    Consolidated profit before tax: Not available1
    (2022: Not available1)
    Consolidated net assets: £2,758,000
    (2021: £2,875,000)

    5
    Hasgrove Limited
    Hasgrove is the holding company for Interact, a SaaS business which provides an intranet product which focuses on the communication and collaboration requirements of large organisations.

    www.interactsoftware.com

    Investment date: December 2016
    Equity held: 5.9%
    (2024: 5.7%)
    Valuation basis: Revenue multiple
    Income received in year to 31 January 2025: n/a
    (2024: n/a)
    Last submitted accounts: 31 December 2023
    Consolidated turnover: £37,032,000
    (2022: £29,388,000)
    Consolidated profit before tax: £9,907,000
    (2022: £8,099,000)
    Consolidated net assets: £13,344,000
    (2022: £13,136,000)

    6
    Sova Assessment Limited
    Sova Assessment is a UK based end-to-end digital candidate assessment SaaS platform targeting large blue-chip organisations conducting large volumes of hiring.

    www.sovaassessment.com

    Investment date: November 2020
    Equity held: 37.2%
    (2024: 37.2%)
    Valuation basis: Revenue multiple
    Income received in year to 31 January 2025: £104,000
    (2024: £93,000)
    Last submitted accounts: 31 March 2024
    Consolidated turnover: £6,780,000
    (2023: £5,611,000)
    Consolidated loss before tax: £(3,685,000)
    (2023: £(5,360,000))
    Consolidated net liabilities: £(5,460,000)
    (2023: £(3,593,000))

    7
    Fable Data Limited
    Fable Data provides anonymised, pan-European consumer transaction data and analysis to institutional investors, businesses, governments and academics.

    www.fabledata.com
      

    Investment date: December 2022
    Equity held: 14.2%
    (2024: 6.2%)
    Valuation basis: Revenue multiple
    Income received in year to 31 January 2025: n/a
    (2024: n/a)
    Last submitted accounts: 31 December 2023
    Consolidated turnover: Not available1
    (2022: Not available1)
    Consolidated profit before tax: Not available1
    (2022: Not available1)
    Consolidated net liabilities: £(1,720,000)
    (2022: £(2,111,000))
       

    8
    Value Blue B.V.
    Value Blue is a provider of enterprise architecture management software, that is growing in the UK. The product allows companies to map their existing technology architecture in a single location to easily plan, collaborate and execute both large scale transformational and everyday IT projects.

    www.valueblue.com

    Investment date: January 2022
    Equity held: 20.3%
    (2024: 20.3%)
    Valuation basis: Revenue multiple
    Income received in year to 31 January 2025: £317,000
    (2024: £19,000)
    Last submitted accounts: 31 December 2023
    Consolidated turnover: Not available1
    (2022: Not available1)
    Consolidated loss before tax: €(7,412,000)
    (2022: €(9,185,000))
    Consolidated net liabilities: €(6,189,000)
    (2022: €(4,595,000))

    9
    Mention Me Limited
    Mention Me is a referral engineering SaaS platform that helps business to consumer (B2C) businesses acquire new customers more successfully through their referral channel.

    www.mention-me.com

    Investment date: December 2021
    Equity held: 19.4%
    (2024: 19.4%)
    Valuation basis: Revenue multiple
    Income received in year to 31 January 2025: n/a
    (2024: n/a)
    Last submitted accounts: 31 December 2023
    Consolidated turnover: £11,561,000
    (2022: £10,244,000)
    Consolidated loss before tax: £(5,175,000)
    (2022: £(5,621,000))
    Consolidated net assets: £5,302,000
    (2022: £10,173,000)

    10
    Fuse Universal Limited

    Fuse is a business-to-business software provider of a cloud-based learning technology platform for corporates, founded in 2008 and based in London (with further offices in South Africa and Australia).

    www.fuseuniversal.com

    Investment date: August 2019
    Equity held: 0%
    (2024: 0%)
    Valuation basis: Revenue multiple
    Income received in year to 31 January 2025: £56,000
    (2024: £100,000)
    Last submitted accounts: 31 December 2023
    Consolidated turnover: £7,997,000
    (2022: £9,338,000)
    Consolidated loss before tax: £(1,044,000)
    (2022: £(2,816,000))
    Consolidated net liabilities: £(2,468,000)
    (2022: £(3,682,000))
    1. These numbers are not available per the latest public filings on Companies House or the company is non-UK.

    Outlook

    It has been a challenging few years for the broader technology sector, with both geopolitical and economic factors impacting the ability of portfolio companies to grow and perform as successfully as forecast. Against this backdrop, I am pleased to report a stable NAV as portfolio companies have shown great resilience in the face of these challenges. Companies have been operating more efficiently in terms of their capital requirements and in several cases we are seeing top-line revenue growth returning steadily, albeit not to the same degree as experienced prior to the beginning of this more turbulent period. The slowdown in revenue growth observed across the portfolio occurred alongside companies striving to preserve cash and move towards profitability to extend their cash runways.

    The nature of the current portfolio and the characteristics of the technology-focused businesses means that several companies have had some degree of protection from the full impact of these more challenging macroeconomic conditions. This is due to recurring revenues and long-term contracts being key features of their business models.

    As mentioned in the Chair’s Statement, we were delighted and grateful for the support we’ve received from the Company’s new and existing investors, with the latest fundraise closing fully subscribed, including the overallotment facility. These funds will allow the Company to continue to support the existing portfolio in their growth plans and to invest in new opportunities which have the potential to become successful and deliver great returns to shareholders in the years to come.

    We were also pleased that the Company benefitted from three profitable disposals in the period, which together returned £18.9 million in proceeds to the Company. We are hopeful that this could indicate an improvement in the mergers and acquisitions (M&A) market, providing more opportunities for exits and offering the Company sustainable growth prospects.

    Despite the macroeconomic climate remaining uncertain, we believe that the rapid pace of change and advancements being made with the development and adoption of AI technology will create many new businesses seeking growth capital. This provides us with a degree of optimism about the Company’s future investment prospects and for its current well-diversified portfolio, as the component companies seek to take advantage which component companies are similarly seeking to take advantage of these advancements in AI. Hence, I am confident that the Company is well-positioned to capitalise on these market opportunities as they arise and that they will be able to offer further growth potential for the Company’s continued success.

    RISKS AND RISK MANAGEMENT

    The Board assesses the risks faced by Apollo and, as a board, reviews the mitigating controls and actions, and monitors the effectiveness of these controls and actions.

    Emerging and principal risks, and risk management

    The Board is mindful of the ongoing risks and will continue to make sure that appropriate safeguards are in place, in addition to monitoring the cash flow forecasts to make sure that the Company has sufficient liquidity.

    The Board carries out a regular review of the risk environment in which the Company operates.

    Emerging risks

    The Board has considered emerging risks. The Board seeks to mitigate emerging risks and those noted below by setting policy, regular review of performance and monitoring progress and compliance. In the mitigation and management of these risks, the Board applies the principles detailed in the Financial Reporting Council’s Guidance on Risk Management, Internal Control and Related Financial and Business Reporting.

    The following are some of the potential emerging risks management and the Board are currently monitoring:

    • adverse changes in global macroeconomic environment;
    • artificial intelligence;
    • geopolitical tensions; and
    • climate change.

    Principal risks

    Risk Mitigation Change
    Investment performance:    
    The focus of Apollo’s investments is in unquoted, small and medium-sized VCT qualifying companies which, by their nature, entail a higher level of risk and may have lower cash reserves than investments in larger quoted companies. Poor performance across these investments may impact Apollo’s ability to raise new funds from investors. Octopus has significant experience and a strong track record of investing in unquoted companies, and appropriate due diligence is undertaken on every new investment. A member of the Octopus Ventures team is typically appointed to the board of a portfolio company subject to an evaluation using a risk based approach that considers the size of the company within the Apollo portfolio and the engagement levels of other investors. Regular board reports are prepared by the portfolio company’s management and examined by the Portfolio Manager. This arrangement, in conjunction with its Portfolio Talent team’s active involvement, allows Apollo to play a prominent role in a portfolio company’s ongoing development and strategy. Although investment strategy is focused on B2B software, the overall risk in the portfolio is mitigated by diversifying investment across a wide spread of holdings in terms of the underlying sub-sector served by the portfolio companies, and their financing stage, age, industry sector and business models. The Board reviews the investment portfolio with the Portfolio Manager on a regular basis. The Portfolio Manager is incentivised to make sure Apollo performs well, via a Performance Incentive Fee (charged annually) for exceeding certain performance hurdles. Increased exposures reflected in the previous period remain unchanged due to the continuing difficult macro environment and challenging trading conditions for some portfolio companies continuing.
    Risk Mitigation Change
    VCT qualifying status risk:    
    Apollo is required at all times to observe the conditions for the maintenance of HMRC-approved VCT status. The loss of such approval could lead to Apollo and its investors losing access to the tax benefits associated with VCT status and, in certain circumstances, to investors being required to repay the initial income tax relief on their investment. Prior to making an investment, the Portfolio Manager seeks assurance from Apollo’s VCT status adviser that the investment will meet the legislative requirements for VCT investments.

    On an ongoing basis, the Portfolio Manager monitors Apollo’s compliance with VCT regulations on a current and forecast basis to ensure ongoing compliance with VCT legislation. Regular updates are provided to the Board throughout the year.

    The VCT status adviser formally reviews Apollo’s compliance with VCT regulations on a bi-annual basis and reports its results to the Board.

    VCT status monitoring by independent advisers continues to reduce the risk of an issue causing a loss of VCT status.
    Risk Mitigation Change
    Operational – reliance on third parties:    
    The Board is reliant on the Portfolio Manager to manage investments effectively, and manage the services of a number of third parties, in particular the registrar and tax advisers. A failure of the systems or controls at the Portfolio Manager or third-party providers could lead to an inability to provide accurate reporting and to ensure adherence to VCT and other regulatory rules. The Board reviews the system of internal control, both financial and non-financial, operated by the Portfolio Manager (to the extent the latter are relevant to Apollo’s internal controls). These include controls that are designed to ensure that Apollo’s assets are safeguarded and that proper accounting records are maintained, as well as any regulatory reporting. Feedback on other third-parties is reported to the Board on at least an annual basis, including adherence to Service Level Agreements where relevant. During the year a depositary has been appointed. This increases the number of key third parties involved in the running of the Company, but also adds additional layers of oversight of the Portfolio Manager. No overall change in risk exposure on balance.
    Risk Mitigation Change
    Information security:    
    A lack of suitable controls could result in a data breach and fines and/or business disruption. The Board is reliant on the Portfolio Manager and third parties to take appropriate measures to prevent a loss of confidential customer information or other malicious events. Annual due diligence is conducted on third parties, which includes a review of their controls for information security. The Portfolio Manager has a dedicated information security team and a third party is engaged to provide continual protection in this area. A security framework is in place to help prevent malicious events. The Portfolio Manager reports to the Board on an annual basis to update it on relevant information security arrangements. Significant and relevant information security breaches are escalated to the Board when they occur. No overall change on balance, although cyber threat remains a significant risk area faced by all service providers. The appropriateness of mitigants in place are continuously reassessed to adapt to new risk exposures, such as those posed by artificial intelligence.
    Risk Mitigation Change
    Economic:    
    Events such as an economic recession, movement in interest rates, fluctuations in foreign exchange rates, inflation, political instability and rising living costs could adversely affect some smaller companies’ valuations, as they may be more vulnerable to changes in trading conditions or the sectors in which they operate. This could result in a reduction in the value of Apollo’s assets. Apollo invests in a portfolio of companies serving markets across a diverse range of sectors, which helps to mitigate against the impact of performance in any one sector. Apollo also maintains adequate liquidity to make sure that it can continue to provide follow-on investment to those portfolio companies that require it and which is supported by the individual investment case.

    The Portfolio Manager monitors the impact of macroeconomic conditions on an ongoing basis and provides updates to the Board at least quarterly.

    Increased exposures reflected in the previous periods remain and have heightened further as economic uncertainty persists through interest rate changes, the risk of recession and other economic factors.
    Risk Mitigation Change
    Legislative:    
    A change to the VCT regulations could adversely impact Apollo by restricting the companies Apollo can invest in under its current strategy. Similarly, changes to VCT tax reliefs for investors could make VCTs less attractive and impact Apollo’s ability to raise further funds.

    Failure to adhere to other relevant legislation and regulation could result in reputational damage and/or fines.

    We are also pleased that the sunset clause in place for April 2025, regarding eligibility of VCTs for tax relief, has been extended to 2035.

    The Portfolio Manager engages with HM Treasury and industry bodies to demonstrate the positive benefits of VCTs in terms of growing UK companies, creating jobs and increasing tax revenue, and to help shape any change to VCT legislation.

    The Portfolio Manager employs individuals with expertise across the legislation and regulation relevant to Apollo. Individuals receive ongoing training and external experts are engaged where required.

    Risk exposure has continued to reduce since the previous period following the extension of the sunset clause to 2035 being agreed.
    Risk Mitigation Change
    Liquidity:    
    Apollo invests in smaller unquoted companies, which are inherently illiquid as there is no readily available market for these shares. Therefore, these may be difficult to realise for their fair market value at short notice. The Portfolio Manager prepares cash flow forecasts to make sure cash levels are maintained in accordance with policies agreed with the Board. Apollo’s overall liquidity levels are monitored on a quarterly basis by the Board, with close monitoring of available cash resources. Apollo maintains sufficient cash and readily realisable securities, including MMFs and OEICs, which can be accessed at short notice. At 31 January 2025, 91% of current asset investments were held in MMFs, realisable within one business day, and 9% in OEICs, realisable within seven business days. Risk exposure remains unchanged from the previous period.
    Risk Mitigation Change
    Valuation:    
    While investments within the portfolio are valued in accordance with International Private Equity and Venture Capital (IPEV) valuation guidelines, for smaller companies establishing a fair value can be difficult due to the lack of readily available market data for similar shares, resulting in a limited number of external reference points. Valuations of portfolio companies are performed by appropriately experienced staff, with detailed knowledge of both the portfolio company and the market in which it operates. These valuations are then subject to review and approval by the Octopus Valuations Committee, comprised of staff who are independent of Octopus Ventures and with relevant knowledge of unquoted company valuations. The Board reviews valuations after they have been agreed by the Octopus Valuations Committee. Risk exposure remains unchanged from the previous period due to economic uncertainty within valuation modelling.

    VIABILITY STATEMENT
    In accordance with provision 36 of the AIC Code of Corporate Governance, the Directors have assessed the prospects of the Company over a period of five years, consistent with the expected investment holding period of a VCT investor. Under VCT rules, subscribing investors are required to hold their investment for a five-year period in order to benefit from the associated tax reliefs. The Board regularly considers strategy, including investor demand for the Company’s shares, and a five-year period is considered to be a reasonable time horizon for this.

    The Board carried out a robust assessment of the emerging and principal risks facing the Company and its current position.

    This includes risks which may adversely impact its business model, future performance, solvency or liquidity, and focused on the major factors which affect the economic, regulatory and political environment. Particular consideration was given to the Company’s reliance on, and close working relationship with, the Portfolio Manager. The principal risks faced by the Company and the procedures in place to monitor and mitigate them are set out above.

    The Board has carried out robust stress testing of cash flows which included assessing the resilience of portfolio companies, including the requirement for any future financial support and the ability to pay dividends and buybacks.

    The Board has additionally considered the ability of the Company to comply with the ongoing conditions to make sure it maintains its VCT qualifying status under its current investment policy.

    Based on the above assessment the Board confirms that it has a reasonable expectation that the Company will be able to continue in operation and meet its liabilities as they fall due over the five-year period to 31 January 2030. The Board is mindful of the ongoing risks and will continue to make sure that appropriate safeguards are in place, in addition to monitoring the cash flow forecasts to make sure that the Company has sufficient liquidity.

    DIRECTORS’ RESPONSIBILITIES STATEMENT

    The Directors are responsible for preparing the Strategic Report, the Directors’ Report, the Directors’ Remuneration Report and the Financial Statements in accordance with applicable law and regulations. They are also responsible for ensuring that the Annual Report and Accounts include information required by the Listing Rules of the Financial Conduct Authority.

    Company law requires the Directors to prepare financial statements for each financial year. Under that law the Directors have elected to prepare the financial statements in accordance with United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice (United Kingdom Accounting Standards and applicable laws) including FRS 102 – “The Financial Reporting Standard applicable in the UK and Republic of Ireland”. Under company law the Directors must not approve the financial statements unless they are satisfied that they give a true and fair view of the state of affairs and profit or loss of the Company for that period.

    In preparing these financial statements, the Directors are required to:

    • select suitable accounting policies and then apply them consistently;
    • make judgements and accounting estimates that are reasonable and prudent;
    • state whether applicable UK accounting standards have been followed, subject to any material departures disclosed and explained in the financial statements;
    • prepare the financial statements on the going concern basis unless it is inappropriate to presume that the Company will continue in business; and
    • prepare a Strategic Report, a Directors’ Report and Directors’ Remuneration Report which comply with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006.

    The Directors are responsible for keeping adequate accounting records that are sufficient to show and explain the Company’s transactions and disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the financial position of the Company and enable them to make sure that the financial statements and the Directors’ Remuneration Report comply with the Companies Act 2006. They are also responsible for safeguarding the assets of the Company and hence for taking reasonable steps for the prevention and detection of fraud and other irregularities.

    Insofar as each of the Directors is aware:

    • there is no relevant audit information of which the Company’s auditor is unaware; and
    • the Directors have taken all steps that they ought to have taken to make themselves aware of any relevant audit information and to establish that the auditor is aware of that information.

    The Directors are responsible for preparing the annual report in accordance with applicable law and regulations. Having taken advice from the Audit and Risk Committee, the Directors consider the annual report and the financial statements, taken as a whole, provide the information necessary to assess the Company’s position, performance, business model and strategy and is fair, balanced and understandable.

    The Directors are responsible for the maintenance and integrity of the corporate and financial information included on the Company’s website. Legislation in the United Kingdom governing the preparation and dissemination of financial statements may differ from legislation in other jurisdictions.

    The Directors confirm that, to the best of their knowledge:

    • the financial statements, prepared in accordance with United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice, including FRS 102, give a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial position and profit or loss of the Company; and
    • the Annual Report and Accounts (including the Strategic Report), give a fair review of the development and performance of the business and the position of the Company, together with a description of the principal risks and uncertainties that it faces.

    On behalf of the Board

    Murray Steele
    Chair

    INCOME STATEMENT

        Year ended 31 January 2025 Year ended 31 January 2024
        Revenue
    £’000
    Capital
    £’000
    Total
    £’000
    Revenue
    £’000
    Capital
    £’000
    Total
    £’000
    Realised gain/(loss) on disposal of fixed asset investments   1,226 1,226 (876) (876)
    Change in fair value of fixed asset investments   37,666 37,666 9,3171 9,3171
    Change in fair value of current asset investments   (574) (574) 16 16
    Investment income   4,082 4,082 2,5761 2,5761
    Investment management fees   (2,147) (6,442) (8,589) (1,862) (5,587) (7,449)
    Performance fee   (6,139) (6,139) (14) (14)
    Other expenses   (3,555) (3,555) (4,006) (4,006)
    Foreign currency translation   (7) (7) 1 1
    Profit/(loss) before tax   (1,627) 25,737 24,110 (3,291)1 2,8561 (435)
    Tax  
    Profit/(loss) after tax   (1,627) 25,737 24,110 (3,291)1 2,8561 (435)
    Earnings/(loss) per share – basic and diluted   (0.2p) 3.0p 2.8p (0.5p)1 0.4p1 (0.1p)
    • The ‘Total’ column of this statement is the profit and loss account of Apollo; the revenue return and capital return columns have been prepared under guidance published by the Association of Investment Companies.
    • All revenue and capital items in the above statement derive from continuing operations.
    • Apollo has only one class of business and derives its income from investments made in shares and securities and from money market funds.

    1 The presentation and classification of £3.5 million of accrued loan interest was updated to be part of the fair value of investments. This balance is therefore an amendment to the balance presented in the 31 January 2024 accounts. This had no impact on the overall loss for the year presented or net asset value.

    Apollo has no other comprehensive income for the period.

    The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

    BALANCE SHEET

        As at 31 January 2025 As at 31 January 2024
        £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000
    Fixed asset investments     395,018   331,8781
    Current assets:          
    Investments   7,912   8,486  
    Money market funds   83,544   47,950  
    Debtors   1,424   2441  
    Cash at bank   4,251   4,868  
    Applications cash   16,780   8,852  
    Total current assets   113,911   70,4001  
    Current liabilities   (26,366)   (11,984)  
    Net current assets     87,545   58,4161
    Net assets     482,563   390,294

    Share capital

       

    956

     

    773

    Share premium     62,281   27,476
    Special distributable reserve     299,284   266,132
    Capital redemption reserve     191   172
    Capital reserve realised     (25,949)   (15,275)
    Capital reserve unrealised     153,438   117,0271
    Revenue reserve     (7,638)   (6,011)1
    Total shareholders’ funds     482,563   390,294
    Net asset value per share – basic and diluted     50.5p   50.5p

    1The presentation and classification of £3.5 million of accrued loan interest was updated to be part of the fair value of investments. This balance is therefore an amendment to the balance presented in the 31 January 2024 accounts. This had no impact on the overall loss for the year presented or net asset value.

    The statements were approved by the Directors and authorised for issue on 22 May 2025 and are signed on their behalf by:

    Murray Steele
    Chair
    Company number: 05840377

    The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

    STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY

      Share capital

    £’000

    Share premium

    £’000

    Special distributable reserves1

    £’000

    Capital redemption reserve

    £’000

    Capital reserve realised1

    £’000

    Capital reserve unrealised

    £’000

    Revenue reserve1

    £’000

    Total

    £’000

    As at 1 February 2024 773 27,476 266,132 172 (15,275) 117,0272 (6,011) 2 390,294
    Total comprehensive income for the year (11,355) 37,092 (1,627) 24,110
    Total contributions by and distributions to owners:
    Repurchase and cancellation of own shares (19) (8,981) 19 (8,981)
    Issue of shares 202 106,017 106,219
    Share issue cost (5,982) (5,982)
    Dividends paid (23,097) (23,097)
    Total contributions by and distributions to owners: 183 100,035 (32,078) 19 68,159
    Other movements:                
    Prior year fixed asset gains now realised 681 (681)
    Cancellation of Share Premium (65,230) 65,230
    Total other movements (65,230) 65,230 681 (681)
    Balance as at 31 January 2025 956 62,281 299,284 191 (25,949) 153,438 (7,638) 482,563

    1 Included within these reserves is an amount of £265,697,000 (2024: £244,846,000) which is considered distributable to shareholders under Companies Act rules. The Income Taxes Act 2007 restricts distribution of capital from reserves created by the conversion of the share premium account into a special distributable reserve until the third anniversary of the share allotment that led to the creation of that part of the share premium account. As at 31 January 2025, £19,920,000 (2024: £34,910,000) of the special reserve is distributable under this restriction.
    2The presentation and classification of £3.5 million of accrued loan interest was updated to be part of the fair value of investments. This balance is therefore an amendment to the balance presented in the 31 January 2024 accounts. This had no impact on the overall loss for the year presented or net asset value.

    The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

      Share capital

    £’000

    Share premium

    £’000

    Special distributable reserves1

    £’000

    Capital redemption reserve

    £’000

    Capital reserve realised1

    £’000

    Capital reserve unrealised

    £’000

    Revenue reserve1

    £’000

    Total

    £’000

    As at 1 February 2023 657 78,440 174,061 159 (20,136) 119,032 (2,720) 349,493
    Total comprehensive income for the year (6,477) 9,3332 (3,291)2 (435)
    Total contributions by and distributions to owners:                
    Repurchase and cancellation of own shares (13) (6,743) 13 (6,743)
    Issue of shares 129 70,927 71,056
    Share issue cost (3,912) (3,912)
    Dividends paid (19,165) (19,165)
    Total contributions by and distributions to owners: 116 67,015 (25,908) 13 41,236
    Other movements:                
    Prior year fixed asset losses now realised 11,338 (11,338)
    Cancellation of Share Premium (117,979) 117,979
    Total other movements (117,979) 117,979 11,338 (11,338)
    Balance as at 31 January 2024 773 27,476 266,132 172 (15,275) 117,0272 (6,011)2 390,294

    1 Reserves considered distributable to shareholders per the Companies Act.
    2 The presentation and classification of £3.5 million of accrued loan interest was updated to be part of the fair value of investments. This balance is therefore an amendment to the balance presented in the 31 January 2024 accounts. This had no impact on the overall loss for the year presented or net asset value.

    The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

    CASH FLOW STATEMENT

        Year to

    31 January 2025
    £’000

    Year to

    31 January 2024
    £’000

    Cash flows from operating activities      
    Profit/(loss) before tax   24,110 (435)
    Adjustments for:      
    Decrease/(increase) in debtors1   (10)1 4,6222
    (Decrease)/increase in creditors   6,454 (8,490)
    (Gain)/loss on disposal of fixed asset investments   (1,226) 876
    Gain on valuation of fixed asset investments   (37,666) (9,317)2
    Loss/(Gain) on valuation of current asset investments   574 (17)
    Transfer of accrued loan interest receivable2   (1,824)2
    Net cash utilised in operating activities   (7,764) (14,585)

    Cash flows from investing activities

         
    Purchase of fixed asset investments   (47,131) (32,975)
    Proceeds on sale of fixed asset investments   21,713 18,292
    Purchase of current asset investments   (4,499)
    Net cash utilised in investing activities   (25,418) (19,182)
    Cash flows from financing activities      
    Movement in applications account   7,928 (409)
    Purchase of own shares   (8,981) (6,743)
    Proceeds from share issues   100,951 66,543
    Cost of share issues   (5,982) (3,912)
    Dividends paid (net of DRIS)   (17,829) (14,653)
    Net cash generated from financing activities   76,087 40,826
    Increase in cash and cash equivalents   42,905 7,059
    Opening cash and cash equivalents   61,670 54,611
    Closing cash and cash equivalents   104,575 61,670
    Cash and cash equivalents comprise      
    Cash at bank   4,251 4,868
    Applications cash   16,780 8,852
    Money market funds   83,544 47,950
    Closing cash and cash equivalents   104,575 61,670

    The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

    1 Movement in debtors, adjusted for £1,170,000 of deferred consideration proceeds.
    2 The presentation and classification of £3.5 million of accrued loan interest was updated to be part of the fair value of investments. This balance is therefore an amendment to the balance presented in the 31 January 2024 accounts. This had no impact on the overall loss for the year presented or net asset value.

    NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

    1. Significant accounting policies

    Apollo is a Public Limited Company (plc) incorporated in England and Wales and its registered office is 33 Holborn, London, EC1N 2HT.

    Apollo’s principal activity is to invest in a diverse portfolio of predominantly unquoted companies with the aim of providing shareholders with attractive tax-free dividends and long-term capital growth.

    Basis of preparation
    The financial statements have been prepared under the historical cost convention, except for the measurement at fair value of certain financial instruments, and in accordance with UK Generally Accepted Accounting Practice (GAAP), including Financial Reporting Standard 102 – ‘The Financial Reporting Standard applicable in the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland’ (FRS 102), and with the Companies Act 2006 and the Statement of Recommended Practice (SORP) ‘Financial Statements of Investment Trust Companies and Venture Capital Trusts (issued 2014 and updated in July 2022)’.

    The significant accounting policies have remained unchanged since those set out in Apollo’s 2024 Annual Report and Accounts.

    2. Investment income
    Accounting policy

    Fixed returns on non-equity shares and debt securities are recognised on a time apportionment basis (including time amortisation of any premium or discount to redemption), so as to reflect the effective interest rate, provided it is considered probable that payment will be received in due course. Income from fixed-interest securities and deposit interest is accounted for on an effective interest rate method. Investment income includes interest earned on MMFs. Dividend income is shown net of any related tax credit.

    Dividends receivable are brought into account when Apollo’s right to receive payment is established and it is probable that payment will be received. Fixed returns on debt are recognised provided it is probable that payment will be received in due course. The nature of dividends received is assessed to establish whether they are revenue or income dividends.

    Disclosure

      31
    January
    31
    January
      2025 2024
      £’000 £’000
    Loan note interest receivable1 163 1
    Dividends receivable
    MMF interest income
    741
    3,178
    576
    2,000
      4,082 2,5761

    1 The presentation and classification of £3.5 million of accrued loan interest was updated to be part of the fair value of investments. This balance is therefore an amendment to the balance presented in the 31 January 2024 accounts.

    3. Investment management and performance fees

      31 January 2025 31 January 2024
      Revenue Capital Total Revenue Capital Total
      £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000
    Investment management fee 2,147 6,442 8,589 1,862 5,587 7,449
    Investment performance fee 6,139 6,139 14 14
      2,147 12,581 14,728 1,862 5,601 7,463

    For the purpose of the revenue and capital columns in the Income Statement, the management fee has been allocated 25% to revenue and 75% to capital, in line with the Board’s expected long-term split of returns in the form of income and capital gains respectively from Apollo’s investment portfolio. The investment performance fee, explained below, is allocated 100% to capital as it is deemed that capital appreciation on investments has primarily driven the total return of Apollo above the required hurdle rate at which the performance fee is payable. The management fee, administration and accountancy fees are calculated based on the NAV which is then multiplied by the number of shares in issue, calculated on a daily basis.

    Octopus provide investment management, accounting and administration services and company secretarial services to Apollo under a management agreement which may be terminated at any time thereafter by not less than twelve months’ notice given by either party. No compensation is payable in the event of terminating the agreement by either party, if the required notice period is given. The fee payable, should insufficient notice be given, will be equal to the fee that would have been paid should continuous service be provided. The basis upon which the management fee is calculated is disclosed within the Annual Report and financial statements.

    Apollo has established a performance incentive scheme whereby the Portfolio Manager is entitled to an annual performance related incentive fee in the event that certain performance criteria are met. Further details of this scheme are disclosed within the Annual Report and financial statements. As at 31 January 2025 £6,139,076 was due to the Portfolio Manager by way of an annual performance fee (2024: £14,000).

    4. Other expenses
    Accounting policy

    All expenses are accounted for on an accruals basis. Expenses are charged wholly to revenue, apart from management fees charged 75% to capital and 25% to revenue, performance fees charged wholly to capital and transaction costs. Transaction costs incurred when purchasing or selling assets are written off to the Income Statement in the period that they occur.

    Disclosure

      31
    January
    31
    January
      2025 2024
      £’000 £’000
    Accounting and administration services 1,288 1,117
    Ongoing trail commission 1,130 1,011
    Directors’ fees 182 140
    Registrars’ fees 120 106
    Audit fees 103 85
    Legal fees 50 12
    Bad debt provision 0 953
    Other administration expenses 682 582
      3,555 4,006

    The ongoing charges ratio of Apollo for the year to 31 January 2025 was 2.4% (2024: 2.4%). Total annual running costs are capped at 2.75% of average net assets (2024 cap: 2.75% of average net assets). This figure excludes any extraordinary items, adviser charges, impairment of interest and performance fees.

    No non-audit services were provided by Apollo’s auditor.

    5. Tax
    Accounting policy

    Current tax is recognised for the amount of income tax payable in respect of the taxable profit/(loss) for the current or past reporting periods using the current UK corporation tax rate. The tax effect of different items of income/gain and expenditure/loss is allocated between capital and revenue return on the “marginal” basis as recommended in the SORP.

    Deferred tax is recognised in respect of all timing differences at the reporting date. Timing differences are differences between taxable profits and total comprehensive income as stated in the financial statements that arise from the inclusion of income and expenses in tax assessments in periods different from those in which they are recognised in financial statements.

    Deferred tax assets are only recognised to the extent that it is probable that they will be recovered against the reversal of deferred tax liabilities or other future taxable profits.

    Disclosure

      31 January 2025 31 January 2024
      Revenue Capital Total Revenue Capital Total
      £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000
    Profit/(loss) before tax1 (1,627) 25,737 24,110 2,8561 (3,290)1 (435)
    Tax at 25% (2024: 24%)1 (407) 6,434 6,027 6861 (791)1 (104)
    Effects of:            
    Non-taxable dividend income (9) (9) (16) (16)
    Non-taxable capital gains on valuations and disposals1 (9,579) (9,579) (2,032)1 (2,032)1
    Expenses not deductible for tax purposes 12 12 14 14
    Excess management expenses on which deferred tax not recognised1 416 3,133 3,549 1,3321 8061 2,1381
                 
    Total tax charge

    1 The presentation and classification of £3.5 million of accrued loan interest was updated to be part of the fair value of investments. This balance is therefore an amendment to the balance presented in the 31 January 2024 accounts. This had no impact on the overall loss for the year presented or net asset value.

    Approved VCTs are exempt from tax on chargeable gains. Since the Directors intend that Apollo will continue to conduct its affairs so as to maintain its approval as a VCT, no deferred tax has been provided in respect of any capital gains or losses arising on the revaluation or disposal of investments based on a prospective tax rate of 25%. Unrelieved tax losses of £64,803,000 (2024: £51,785,000) are estimated to be carried forward at 31 January 2025 (subject to completion of Apollo’s tax return) and are available for offset against future taxable income, subject to agreement with HMRC. Apollo has not recognised the deferred tax asset of £16,201,000 (2024: £12,946,000) in respect of these tax losses because there is insufficient forecast taxable income in excess of deductible expenses to utilise these losses carried forward. There is no expiry period on these deductible expenses under the UK HMRC legislation.

    6. Dividends
    Accounting policy

    Dividends payable are recognised as distributions in the financial statements when Apollo’s liability to make payment has been established. This liability is established on the record date, the date on which those shareholders on the share register are entitled to the dividend. Interim dividends to equity shareholders are declared by the Directors.

    Disclosure

      31
    January
    31
    January
      2025 2024
      £’000 £’000
    Dividends paid in the year    
    Second interim dividend: 1.3p per share paid 2 May 2024 (2024: 1.3p per share) in respect of prior year 10,901 8,739
    Interim dividend: 1.3p per share paid 20 December 2024 (2024: 1.4p) in respect of the current year 12,196 10,426
      23,097 19,165
         
      31
    January
    31
    January
      2025 2024
      £’000 £’000
    Dividends in respect of the year    
    Interim dividend: 1.3p per share paid 20 December 2024 (2024: 1.4p) 12,196 10,426
    Second interim dividend: 1.3p paid 8 May 2025 (2024: 1.3p per share) 13,663 10,901
      25,859 21,327
    The figures above include dividends elected to be reinvested through the DRIS. In the year to 31 January 2025, the net proceeds reinvested through the DRIS totalled £5,268,000 (2024: £4,513,000).

    7. Earnings per share

      31 January 2025 31 January 2024
      Revenue Capital Total Revenue Capital Total
    Profit/(loss) attributable to ordinary shareholders (£’000)1 (1,627) 25,737 24,110 (3,291)1 2,8561 (435)1
    Earnings per ordinary share (p)1 (0.2p) 3.0p 2.8p (0.5p)1 0.4p1 (0.1p)1

    1 The presentation and classification of £3.5 million of accrued loan interest was updated to be part of the fair value of investments. This balance is therefore an amendment to the balance presented in the 31 January 2024 accounts. This had no impact on the overall loss for the year presented or net asset value.

    The earnings per share is based on 867,758,701 Ordinary shares (2024: 709,769,066), being the weighted average of shares in issue during the year.

    There are no potentially dilutive capital instruments in issue and, as such, the basic and diluted earnings per share are identical.

    8. Net asset value per share

      31
    January
    31
    January
      2025 2024
      Ordinary shares Ordinary shares
    Net assets (£) 482,563,000 390,294,000
    Shares in issue 956,172,843 772,743,612
    Net asset value per share (p) 50.5 50.5

    There are no potentially dilutive capital instruments in issue and, as such, the basic and diluted NAV per share are identical.

    9. Transactions with the Portfolio Manager

    Apollo has employed Octopus throughout the year as the Portfolio Manager. Apollo has incurred £8,589,000 (2024: £7,449,000) in management fees due to the Portfolio Manager in the year. At 31 January 2025 there was £2,295,000 outstanding (2024: £1,989,000). The management fee is payable quarterly in arrears and is based on 2% of the NAV calculated daily from 31 January.

    The Portfolio Manager is entitled to an annual performance-related incentive fee, subject to the total return (NAV plus cumulative dividends paid) per share being at least 100p at the end of the relevant period. This performance fee is equal to 20% of the amount by which the NAV plus cumulative dividends paid per share exceeds the higher of:

    • The highest total return in previous accounting periods. This is currently the return in the year to 31 January 2024 (137.9p).
    • The total return as at 1 February 2012, plus the average Bank of England interest rate to date, commencing 1 February 2012.

    The Board considers that the liability becomes due at the point that the performance criteria are met, which has happened at the end of this financial year. In the year, Apollo incurred performance fees of £6,139,076 (2024: £14,000). At 31 January 2025 there were £6,139,076 of outstanding performance fees to be paid (2024: £14,000).
    The Portfolio Manager also provides accounting and administrative services to Apollo, payable quarterly in arrears, for a fee of 0.3% of the NAV calculated daily. During the year £1,288,000 (2024: £1,117,000) was paid to the Portfolio Manager, of which £344,000 (2024: £298,000) was outstanding at the Balance Sheet date, for the accounting and administrative services. In addition, the Portfolio Manager also provides company secretarial services for a fee of £20,000 per annum (2024: £20,000).

    Several members of the Octopus investment team hold Non-Executive Directorships as part of their monitoring roles in Apollo’s portfolio companies, but they have no controlling interests in those companies. The Portfolio Manager receives transaction fees and directors’ fees from these portfolio companies. During the year ended 31 January 2025, Directors’ fees of £788,000 attributable to the investments of Apollo were received by the Portfolio Manager (2024: £821,000).

    Octopus AIF Management Limited remuneration disclosures (unaudited)
    Quantitative remuneration disclosures required to be made in this annual report in accordance with the FCA Handbook FUND 3.3.5 are available on the website: https://www.octopusinvestments.com/remuneration-disclosures/.

    10. Related party transactions

    As at 31 January 2025, Octopus Investments Nominees Limited (OINL) held 315 shares (2024: 315) in Apollo as beneficial owner, having purchased these from shareholders to protect their interests after delays or errors with shareholder instructions and other similar administrative issues. Throughout the period to 31 January 2025 OINL purchased nil shares (2024: 315) at a cost of nil (2024: £163) and sold nil shares (2024: 173,900) for proceeds of nil (2024: £87,993). This is classed as a related party transaction as per the Listing Rules, as Octopus, the Portfolio Manager, and OINL are part of the same group of companies. Any such future transactions, where OINL takes over the legal and beneficial ownership of Company shares will be announced to the market and disclosed in annual and half-yearly reports.

    11. 2025 financial information

    The figures and financial information for the year ended 31 January 2025 are extracted from the Company’s annual financial statements for the period and do not constitute statutory accounts. The Company’s annual financial statements for the year to 31 January 2025 have been audited but have not yet been delivered to the Registrar of Companies. The Auditors’ report on the 2025 annual financial statements was unqualified, did not include a reference to any matter to which the auditors drew attention without qualifying the report, and did not contain any statements under Sections 498(2) or 498(3) of the Companies Act 2006.

    12. 2024 financial information

    The figures and financial information for the year ended 31 January 2024 are extracted from the Company’s annual financial statements for the period and do not constitute statutory accounts. The Company’s annual financial statements for the year to 31 January 2024 have been audited but have not yet been delivered to the Registrar of Companies. The Auditors’ report on the 2024 annual financial statements was unqualified, did not include a reference to any matter to which the auditors drew attention without qualifying the report, and did not contain any statements under Sections 498(2) or 498(3) of the Companies Act 2006.

    13. Annual Report and financial statements
    The Annual Report and financial statements will be posted to shareholders in June and will be available on the Company’s website. The Notice of Annual General Meeting is contained within the Annual Report.

    14. General information
    Registered in England & Wales. Company No. 05840377
    LEI: 213800Y3XEIQ18DP3O53

    15. Directors
    Murray Steele (Chair), Christopher Powles, Alex Hambro, Claire Finn and Gillian Elcock.

    16. Secretary and registered office
    Octopus Company Secretarial Services Limited
    6th Floor, 33 Holborn, London EC1N 2HT

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI Canada: Closure of National Capital Region bridges to motorists

    Source: Government of Canada News

    For immediate release

    Gatineau, Quebec, May 22, 2025 – Public Services and Procurement Canada (PSPC) wishes to advise motorists that the following bridges will be closed on Sunday, May 25, to accommodate the Tamarack Ottawa Race Weekend:

    • Alexandra Bridge: from 6 am to 1 pm
    • Chaudière Crossing: from 6 to 11 am

    During this period, the bridges will remain accessible to cyclists and pedestrians. The Portage Bridge, under the stewardship of the National Capital Commission, will also be closed from 6 to 11:30 am.

    The Champlain Bridge and the Macdonald-Cartier Bridge will remain open to motorists.

    The schedule may change depending on weather conditions.

    PSPC encourages users to exercise caution when travelling on the bridges and thanks them for their patience.

    MIL OSI Canada News

  • MIL-OSI Global: After 50 successful years, the European Space Agency has some big challenges ahead

    Source: The Conversation – UK – By Daniel Brown, Lecturer in Astronomy, Nottingham Trent University

    Rosetta at Comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko. ESA/ATG medialab; Comet image: ESA/Rosetta/Navcam

    This year marks the 50th anniversary of the founding of the European Space Agency (Esa). It has launched spectacularly successful missions, but is different to other space agencies which generally represent one country. Esa is funded by 23 member states and also has cooperation agreements with nations such as Canada.

    Esa operates cutting edge spacecraft designed to monitor the Earth, as well as space telescopes that study the distant cosmos. It has launched robotic spacecraft to other planets and to objects such as comets. It is also involved in human spaceflight – training European astronauts to work on the International Space Station (ISS).

    These are hugely successful achievements. But the agency now faces challenges as competition heats up among newer space powers such as China and India.

    The history of Esa can be traced to events immediately after the second world war, when many European scientists moved to either the US or to the Soviet Union. Many of them realised that projects supported only by a single nation could not compete with those supported by the two big geopolitical players at the time.

    This motivated the physicists Pierre Auger, from France, and Edoardo Amaldi, from Italy, to propose a European organisation that would carry out space research and would be “purely scientific”.

    In 1962, two agencies were created. One of these, the European Launch Development Organisation (ELDO), would concentrate on developing a rocket. The other, the European Space Research Organisation (ESRO), would focus on developing robotic spacecraft. Both were joined together in 1975 to form the European Space Agency.

    The push to build a European rocket would eventually yield the Ariane launcher, which is operated by the French company Arianespace.

    The first satellite to be launched under the banner of the newly formed European Space Agency was Cos-B. This spacecraft was designed to monitor a high energy form of radiation called gamma rays, being emitted from objects in space.

    Esa collaborated with other space agencies on the Hubble Space Telescope.
    ESA/NASA

    In 1978, Esa cooperated with Nasa and the UK on the International Ultraviolet Explorer mission. This space telescope was designed to observe the cosmos in ultraviolet light, something that cannot be done from Earth.

    The agency would later collaborate with Nasa and the Canadian Space Agency on one of the most successful space telescopes of all time: Hubble. Launched in 1990, the Hubble Space Telescope helped confirm the expansion rate of the universe and showed that black holes are at the cores of almost all galaxies. Hubble’s stunning images also changed the way that many people saw the universe. Esa funded one of the original instruments on the space telescope, the Faint Object Camera, and provided the first two solar arrays.

    The space agency is also a partner on the revolutionary James Webb Telescope, which launched in 2021. Esa contributed two of the telescope’s instruments: the Near-Infrared Spectrograph (NirSpec) and the Mid-Infrared Instrument (Miri).

    Solar System missions

    Esa has also launched pioneering missions to other planets and objects in our solar system. The first of these was the Giotto comet explorer. This robotic spacecraft flew past Halley’s comet in 1986 and was successfully woken up in 1992 to study a comet called Grigg-Skejllerup.

    A second successful cometary mission followed when the Rosetta spacecraft entered orbit around Comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko in 2014. Rosetta despatched a lander called Philae to touch down on the comet’s surface.

    Rosetta has been my favourite of all Esa achievements, simply due to the pure audacity of attempting to land on an object whose shape and composition was until then only sparsely known. In order to “land” on an object with low gravity, Philae was to have deployed harpoons that would attach the lander to the surface. These systems did not work, but the overall mission was a success, leading to high levels of engagement from the public.

    Besides comets, Esa launched one of the most successful missions to the red planet: Mars Express. The spacecraft entered orbit around Mars in 2003 and has played a key role in enhancing understanding of our planetary neighbour. It is expected to continue working until at least 2034. Mars Express also carried the ill-fated British Beagle 2 spacecraft to Mars. This was supposed to land in 2003, but contact was never established with the probe, which is presumed to have been damaged while touching down.

    In 2005, Esa’s Huygens spacecraft landed on Titan, Saturn’s largest moon. This was the furthest from Earth that a spacecraft has ever landed. These are all outward facing missions, but Esa has also had major success with projects to study what’s going on here on Earth. These include the Envisat satellite, which operated from 2002-2012, and the Sentinel series of spacecraft, which have operated from 2014 to the present.

    These have helped map agriculture and forests, understand the Earth’s climate, track ice, and monitor atmospheric ozone. In addition, the Galileo navigation satellites are providing a high precision alternative to GPS.

    Esa is also a major player in human spaceflight, having been a partner in the International Space Station project since 1993. It has built sections of the ISS, including the Columbus laboratory, launched in 2008, and the Cupola viewing window, which gives astronauts panoramic views of Earth. The agency’s astronauts regularly spend time on the ISS as crew and could even fly to the Moon under Nasa’s Artemis programme.

    Since the 1990s, Esa has frequently collaborated with Nasa – often very successfully. However, this relationship has also faced challenges. In the wake of the financial crisis, for example, Nasa cancelled its participation in several collaborative missions with Esa. Under a proposed Nasa budget this year, the US space agency may again cancel its involvement with the joint Nasa-Esa Mars Sample Return mission.

    Esa’s future

    Times have changed in the space industry since Esa’s founding 50 years ago. Major countries such as China, India and Japan all have their own space programmes. Esa faces considerable financial pressures to compete with them.

    Nevertheless, Esa is working on strengthening its space exploration and launch capabilities through the use of a commercial space port in Norway.

    It has also put together a long-term strategy for 2040. This document highlights important areas where Esa can play a major role, including protecting Earth and its climate, continued missions to explore space and also efforts to boost European growth and competitiveness.

    All this should strengthen and secure the agency for the future. Through a mixture of developing its own missions and collaborating with other agencies and commercial partners on others, Esa should be a major player in space exploration for decades to come.

    Daniel Brown does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. After 50 successful years, the European Space Agency has some big challenges ahead – https://theconversation.com/after-50-successful-years-the-european-space-agency-has-some-big-challenges-ahead-256633

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI Global: ‘We are all lumped under one umbrella of hate’: when social attitudes change, what is life like for people who don’t agree?

    Source: The Conversation – UK – By Carol Ballantine, Postdoctoral Researcher and Lecturer in Gender and Equality Studies, University College Dublin

    charactervectorart/Shutterstock

    Pseudonyms are used in this article; interviewees who asked for their real names to be used are asterisked.

    In 2016, one of us (Kath) attended New Normal, a conference in London which opposed LGBT+ rights, including lesbian parenting and gender recognition. As a lesbian parent, I was upset by what was said – and by the way people stood to applaud speakers who warned of the dangers of parents like me, while mentioning the need to “protect children”.

    Yet that conference also opened my eyes to my – and perhaps, many other people’s – lack of understanding of what it can mean to stand against the apparent state-supported, liberal consensus on such issues. On day two, the organisers appealed for help for the parents of a trans or gender-diverse child. My notes from that day read:

    The parents feel they are not listened to, and are ‘encouraged by social services’ to treat ‘her’ like a boy. But social services have only known ‘her’ for six months – so they don’t know ‘her’. The parents are told if they don’t agree to a name change, it is neglectful and that she is suicidal. The mother argues: ‘We love our daughter.’

    Unexpectedly and conflictually, I found myself relating to the parents’ story in some way. And I wondered how I would feel as a same-sex parent if I was ever in a situation where my child rejected their family as a “moral abomination”.

    These thoughts proved a starting point for Beyond Opposition – our project which, since 2020, has been looking at the lives of people who are reticent about or object to the perceived liberalising of societies’ sexual and gender laws in Great Britain, Ireland and Canada.

    The idea of this research is not to defend their positions. Nor is it to explore their politics around sexualities and genders, which we and many others do in research into anti-gender movements. Rather, we wanted to understand the experiences that might drive these politics.


    The Insights section is committed to high-quality longform journalism. Our editors work with academics from many different backgrounds who are tackling a wide range of societal and scientific challenges.


    As far back as 2012, prompted by my colleague, urban geographer Catherine Nash, I (Kath) began noticing an evolution in arguments against changes like same-sex marriage, gender recognition and relationship and sexuality education in schools – an evolution that was not always fully recognised, or even noticed, by supporters of these changes. People who objected to such societal shifts were sometimes being politicised through court cases around their work and their children’s experiences at school.

    For Beyond Opposition, we put a call out to people who opposed or had concerns about changing laws and policies related to gender, sexuality or abortion. As well as contacting organisations and activists who actively campaigned against these changes, we used social media to reach out to people who had no connections with these groups.

    In more than 160 interviews between 2020 and 2022, we explored the daily experiences of living outside the social consensus in three countries where, at the time, there was broad legal, political and social agreement in favour of same-sex marriage, abortion, gender self-identification and related policies. The surprising diversity of positions and experiences we heard not only shed new light on how societies were changing; they painted a sometimes disturbing picture of how these shifts were being challenged and resisted.

    Not all far-right

    In the 1990s in secondary school, I would have been completely open about my view on [abortion], because it was a more accepted view, I suppose … [Now] I have this view and don’t feel I can even express it [because] everyone else disagrees … I feel like I can’t even say this to anyone.

    We first met Niamh in 2021, three years after Ireland’s historic referendum to repeal one of the EU’s strictest legal barriers to abortion, which led to limited access to abortion care. Where once her anti-abortion views were considered mainstream, in Ireland and many other countries where abortion is accepted legally and socially, now her views are in the minority.

    Niamh was clear she did not regard herself as “conservative” and said she was strongly in favour of human rights. She told us: “If I have to categorise myself, I’d categorise myself as ‘pro-life’.” But she expressed frustration at how people assumed this position automatically predicted what she thought about other topics relating to gender and sexuality, explaining:

    There’s this thing that’s like: [because] you’re against abortion, you’re against same-sex marriage or against refugees coming into the country … I struggle with it because the people in my circle on social justice issues are not usually aligned with my [anti-abortion] position. They tend to have the opposite view – [mine] tends to be seen as a really conservative stance, not a rights-based stance.


    Fagreia/Shutterstock

    Niamh, like many of our interviewees, expressed views quite differently from the organisations opposing sexual and gender equalities that I (Kath) had encountered in earlier research. While those organisations were diverse, they were often aligned on abortion, same-sex marriage and gender recognition. This contrasted with the differences that people such as British woman Jane identified when we met her.

    “I wouldn’t want to sit down in a room with somebody who said gay people were going to hell,” Jane told us. “We just wouldn’t have anything to talk about.” But she also felt it would be “impossible to have a conversation with somebody who does not believe in the existence of biological sex”.

    While Jane objected to trans rights being “given primacy”, she thought of herself as different to people who are seen as anti-gender activists. Describing herself as “gender critical”, she said: “Why this is so toxic and has started to spill out into my day-to-day life is that we are all just lumped under one umbrella of hate.”

    Like many of our interviewees, Jane objected to being placed in a single category that, in her experience, carries overwhelmingly negative associations. She told us her daily life was being affected because people attributed opinions to her that she considers hateful.

    On the whole, public attitudes across the EU and Canada still favour a broadening of gender and sexual inclusion. But academic research on changing social norms relating to gender and sexuality is largely silent on how these changes can affect those who “do not agree”.

    Many of our interviewees emphasised their distance from other people who held similar views. Indeed, this sentiment of not fitting a stereotype was so common that we still have no single phrase to describe the group of people we spoke to. Common terms like “anti-gender” or “far-right” were rejected by most participants.

    Yet we found the experiences they described had a lot in common. James, in Ireland, said he “came down towards the ‘no’ side” in the 2018 Irish abortion referendum, yet the social associations of this troubled him:

    I definitely wouldn’t ever go on a pro-life parade or protest, or anything like that. I see those people [as] ultra-religious conservatives who are not free-thinking, who want to just force their opinions on other people. There’s no way I could ever want to be associated with people like that.

    While most interviewees resisted the stereotypes they say get assigned to their position, pushing back against being seen as anti-rights or anti-equalities, some did express positions more in line with a stereotypical anti-gender activist. Brian in Canada, for example, told us he was “in a pro-life Catholic Christian bubble”, and that he would not welcome gay or trans people into his home for dinner.

    ‘I don’t feel comfortable in my own house’

    Anne, a Canadian woman who described herself as a feminist with gender-critical opinions, said she had withdrawn from her volunteer work supporting survivors of sexual violence because she recognised that “my gender-critical opinions are really toxic to others”.

    But the relationship that most troubled her was with her daughter. Anne described how her home life had been significantly affected by her interest in “gender-critical” content:

    In my house, which should be the place where I feel the most comfortable, at no time do I discuss these things. If I’m watching a video with these concerns, or am online in some way with these concerns, when my daughter who lives with me comes into the room, I turn it off. So I don’t feel at all comfortable in my own house.

    Anne was distressed by the impact her gender-critical position had on her relationship with her daughter. She recognised that content she sometimes viewed was considered “toxic” by many people, including her daughter, and expressed sadness about the damage this had done to their relationship:

    It’s very saddening to me because my daughter and I are so close, but this has become a barrier. It has become a block. The only time we talked about it at length, we were both in tears.

    We heard a number of stories like Anne’s, of close relationships becoming deeply fractured by differences on such topics. These interviewees felt their positions were fundamentally opposed by family members. Some, conscious of the tensions, kept their views to themselves even in their own home. As a result of her differences with her daughter, Anne said: “I don’t speak to her about anything in order to keep peace in the house.”


    Vectorium/Shutterstock

    Ciara, a leftwing Irishwoman who voted against abortion in the 2018 referendum, described the careful way she navigated her friendships, recognising that her friend group would hold very different views to her on abortion:

    You kind of judge the friendship a little bit. Can this friendship take this news that I voted ‘no’? [Laughs] I’ve lied – I’ve told others I voted ‘yes’.

    Ciara noted that in her everyday life, it was generally assumed everybody was pro-choice – as she had once been. She was not religious and, like many of our interviewees, distanced herself from rightwing politics.

    But in her family and among her friends, being against abortion was automatically understood as being rightwing, so she kept quiet about it. This made her question herself, resulting in what she described as “a whole range of inner dilemmas”:

    You strategise – you suss out, like, how is this going to go down? How is this going to impact on this friendship? And on trust – how will I be seen?

    Keeping quiet among friends and family makes concerned, oppositional positions harder to see and understand. So, it is possible for researchers and others to deny these positions exist – and to not address their impact. Many people spoke to us on condition that their identities would be concealed – something that came across especially strongly when they spoke about their fears at work.

    ‘At work, I can’t risk my livelihood’

    Work is central to many people’s lives. Tammy* from Canada, who described herself as “not a pro-gay person, just a pro-people person”, told us she felt uncomfortable with some workplace inclusion policies, such as Pride month:

    At work, we have an app on our phone and … for gay pride, in June, the whole month is just devoted to that history, right? And it annoys me because it’s like: OK, I get it … [but] I don’t like people trying to program me.

    The promotion of LGBTQ+ rights through corporate platforms made Tammy feel suspicious. Other Beyond Opposition participants went further, fearing their jobs could be at risk.

    For Cindy, who is also from Canada and described herself as “dabbling in gender-critical feminism”, her position was out-of-line with her workplace. Her employer took positive actions to promote LGBTQ+ inclusion. She felt that to object to such actions might “risk my livelihood, so I can’t even broach the subject”.

    It was not only the owners and managers who Cindy feared would view her “as a bigot”. She also worried that colleagues might cause conflict for her if she expressed her position outside the workplace consensus.

    Like others in our research, Cindy deliberately stayed out of activism. But during her mandatory workplace training, she said: “The whole time I’m biting my tongue.” Her concern was that she might be obliged to take an action that she didn’t believe in:

    If anyone were ever to say: ‘Go around the room and say your preferred pronouns,’ I’m not sure how I would answer that because I don’t believe in the ideology of preferred pronouns. I worry that if I just said something like: ‘No thank you, I don’t believe in it,’ that might actually cause me to lose my job.

    Workplace inclusion policies, training and practices have been shown to be effective in improving workplaces in terms of their productivity and wellbeing for employees – although in some cases, they can be poorly implemented and insufficient. But some of the people we spoke to, including Tammy and Cindy, described them as “feared” and “hated”.

    Mark went even further, suggesting he was being asked to deny his “moral values” – and that his work would not be secure if he didn’t. A freelance worker in rural Ireland, Mark believed he needed to “keep his head down” with regard to his views on sexuality and abortion:

    I’m self-employed … I can say it here to you but I’m certainly not shouting about this in the pub. I depend on the milk of human kindness from people.

    Some of our interviewees have used the law to challenge employers where their jobs were lost or under threat. Most had not experienced any official sanctions – yet many feared them. Cindy said that as a result, she kept her views to herself at work: “I guess I choose harmony and peace over being right.”

    It is these “quiet concerns” at work and among family and friends – of people who are not vocal in opposition to changing laws and policies, but still act against them – that we believe are not well documented or understood. And our research shows that in their experience of being negatively labelled and having their experiences dismissed or minimised, some have been driven to look beyond their usual communities to find support for their views.


    Accogliente Design/Shutterstock

    Accidental activists

    Although most people in our study are not activists and did not seek to be public about their views, many quietly supported those who were, or engaged with them to find support for their views.

    Those who felt uncomfortable talking to people in their own circles often told us about how they had found support elsewhere. Suzy, a British woman who said she was gender critical, described the first meeting she had attended that opposed trans rights:

    I just happened to make the decision to go [to a conference run by an organisation opposing gender self-identification] on my own … I had nobody in my life at that point who was a feminist who had these views. It’s why I went by myself. And I met some really amazing women who just completely welcomed me into this world. That opened a lot of doors for me.

    Suzy’s experience was echoed by others who had concerns about trans rights or gender recognition. Such groups were not always public, and some organised in secret – something Suzy believed was unjust but necessary, because of the distance from the social consensus of people who held views like hers:

    There is a private online messaging app – you have to be invited. I had to be vetted … to make sure I was a real person – [that] I wasn’t trying to infiltrate. It’s so ridiculous that we are having to jump through these hoops just to talk about it and express our opinion about something that for a really long time was okay to think. Now all of a sudden, it’s not okay to think this way. So you’re a societal pariah.

    At the time of our interview in 2020, Suzy was actively involved in organising to oppose the proposed amendments to the UK’s Gender Recognition Act. She had moved from having “nobody in my life … who was a feminist who had those views”, to participating in an organised campaign to influence this legislation:

    I wouldn’t necessarily describe myself as an activist – I think that word is quite a bit loaded in negative connotations now … I prefer the term ‘campaigner’ because what I started to get involved in was campaigning for the law not to be changed. I wasn’t going out on marches or anything like that.

    Proposals to update the Act in line with international human rights standards stalled and then were halted in the UK from 2018 onwards, with the support of civil society campaigners including Suzy. Since then, other campaigns have had greater successes – including, most recently, a Supreme Court ruling defining “sex” as “biological sex” in the 2010 Equality Act.

    ‘I’m not saying that I am right’

    For the many people who have spent years campaigning for gender equality and to improve LGBTQ+ lives, it is possible to understand the day-to-day accounts of our interviewees as evidence of success. Many told us they could not now express opinions on others’ relationships, sexual activity or their decisions about pregnancy and parenthood in some workplaces – and sometimes even at home.

    For some interviewees, this shift was expressed as fear, where their positions were seen to negatively affect them at work even if they didn’t express them openly. They didn’t feel able to raise questions about gender and sexual equality or abortion at work or in their volunteering and organising spaces.

    It is possible to understand this shift as a welcome victory for equalities. But our research highlights that, for many people who maintain reticence to these societal changes, the ability to reconsider or change their position has been reduced by their day-to-day work, social and family experiences.

    Cindy, for example, expressed a moment of doubt about her concerns about trans rights, admitting: “I’m not saying that I am right. Like, there is the possibility I’m not …” However, this reflective stance was not encouraged by experiences of work that she described as forcing her to “bite my tongue”.

    She and others told us the implementation of inclusion policies and training in their workplaces felt paradoxical – because they’d had the effect of making their own behaviour less inclusive. Cindy admitted she was less inclined to question herself because of the way she felt her views were treated.

    Mark, the freelance worker in Ireland, considered himself “very leftwing” and said he would “always defend the underdog”. But he told us people like him were “very much put off” by what he saw as the “tactics of what now are leftwing liberal policies”. His experiences of feeling outside the consensus, and fearing a loss of employment opportunities, meant he – and others we interviewed – were less open to engaging sympathetically with the experiences of sexual- and gender-minoritised people.

    Fear, upset and discomfort from social change

    While stories like Niamh’s and Cindy’s are sometimes used to argue that transformations have “gone too far”, research does not support this argument. In fact, those “left out in the cold” are typically the LGBTQ+ people whose needs are not being met by policies like same-sex marriage (or who remain excluded from these policies), and those seeking sexual and reproductive healthcare in all its forms.

    Our interviewees do not negate this. They highlight the fear, upset and discomfort that results from social change for some people who hold firm to their positions opposing or questioning provisions such as abortion, same-sex marriage, gender recognition. In research, these everyday experiences are rarely considered beyond their political views (assumed to be rightwing) and how to explain or change them.

    Our interviewees believe their positions are frequently mis-characterised and conflated in the media and by policymakers in order to dismiss them – and therefore, that their experiences go unseen and unrecognised. And in their experience of being outsiders – feeling labelled and minimised – they may, like Suzy, find their way to actively opposing legislation and social change that benefits LGBTQ+ people and/or those who need abortion rights. Some offered quiet support to political causes, including donating their time or money.

    The world today is very different even to 2022, when we finished the Beyond Opposition interviews. The UK has seen some fundamental shifts especially regarding gender recognition, including the recent Supreme Court ruling that defined “sex” as “biological sex” in the 2010 Equality Act.

    In the US, providing affirmative care to trans children was deemed “mutilation” in recent executive orders from the president, Donald Trump, which stated that offering support to trans and gender-diverse children against their families’ will would be considered as “child abuse”.

    As the struggle for rights continues, we believe it’s essential for research, policy and practice to pay attention to the full range of impacts of the divisions that drive much of today’s politics. Experiences like those of the parents at the conference mentioned at the start of this article, who felt that affirming their child’s gender identity went against their beliefs, contribute to the shape of the world we all live in.

    It is possible to have a clear and firm view on the rights of trans and gender-diverse children, while also considering the implications for society of the experiences (as distinct from the opinions and arguments) of those who disagree. It feels important to do this now in places where some of us – lesbian parents, parents of trans kids and others – are still (somewhat) protected by the system, as we find ourselves, in the US and elsewhere, once again labelled “a danger to children”.

    For the second phase of Beyond Opposition, we brought people together from very different positions to see if they could imagine a world where they could live together, without seeking to change each other’s minds. We wanted to know if there were new ways of thinking about the problem of division, which recognised that some differences may be here to stay.

    Our intention was not to debate, negotiate or resolve their differences, but to explore the idea that it may be necessary to live together without ever agreeing on aspects related to gender, sexuality or abortion. One key outcome of these workshops was a number of moments in which participants met a complete impasse – where they had to acknowledge that their utopia could not accommodate the other person’s position at all.

    This is a starting point for important questions about not being able to change someone else’s mind, yet still needing to share places with them. We hope to write more on this subject soon.


    For you: more from our Insights series:

    To hear about new Insights articles, join the hundreds of thousands of people who value The Conversation’s evidence-based news. Subscribe to our newsletter.

    Dr. Carol Ballantine researches genders, sexualities and violence. She worked as the Ireland and UK postdoctoral researcher on Beyond Opposition, funded by the ERC.

    This article is funded by work undertaken under the ERC Grant No: 81789 granted to Kath Browne and also receives EU Horizon Europe funding. She has worked for LGBTQIA+ organisations is affiliated with LinQ.

    ref. ‘We are all lumped under one umbrella of hate’: when social attitudes change, what is life like for people who don’t agree? – https://theconversation.com/we-are-all-lumped-under-one-umbrella-of-hate-when-social-attitudes-change-what-is-life-like-for-people-who-dont-agree-253464

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI Canada: Public input sought as Massey Tunnel replacement progresses

    Source: Government of Canada regional news

    The public is invited to learn more and provide feedback about the replacement for the George Massey Tunnel and how environmental impacts during construction will be managed now that the application for the project’s environmental assessment certificate has been submitted.

    To ensure construction of the new tunnel begins as soon as possible, construction-level project design is underway now.

    People are invited to provide feedback to the Environmental Assessment Office on the application to ensure it includes all the studies and information required to assess the potential positive and negative impacts of the project. The public comment period runs from May 22, 2025, until June 23, 2025.

    The new toll-free tunnel will include three travel lanes and one dedicated transit lane in each direction, improving travel times for transit and drivers along Highway 99. When complete, it is expected that drivers will travel at speeds of approximately 80 km/h along the corridor, compared to 30 km/h today. The tunnel will also include a dedicated multi-use pathway that will allow walking and cycling across the river at this location for the first time.

    In advance of the new eight-lane tunnel’s construction, corridor improvements continue along Highway 99. These include replacement of the Steveston Highway Crossing with a new five-lane interchange. The first half of the new interchange is open to vehicles, with the second half under construction. The new interchange will be completed later in 2025.

    The Province has also started preliminary work to expand Highway 99 between Westminster Highway and Steveston Highway, with the placement of preload complete.

    People can learn more about the project and the environmental assessment process by attending a public open house:

    Wednesday, June 4, 2025
    Delta Hotels Vancouver Delta/Cascadia Casino and Conference Centre
    6005 Highway 17A
    Delta
    4-8 p.m.

    Thursday, June 5, 2025
    UBC Boathouse
    7277 River Rd.
    Richmond
    4-8 p.m.

    Project team members and Environmental Assessment Office staff will be available at the sessions to provide information and answer questions about the project and the environmental assessment process. Feedback can be provided online here: https://engage.eao.gov.bc.ca/FraserTunnel-AR.

    Learn More:

    For more information on environmental assessments, visit: https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/environment/natural-resource-stewardship/environmental-assessments

    For more information on the Fraser River Tunnel assessment, visit: https://projects.eao.gov.bc.ca/p/620aa098fd30c700220f2805/project-details

    For more information on the Highway 99 Tunnel Program, visit: www.highway99tunnel.ca

    MIL OSI Canada News

  • MIL-OSI Economics: Why Alberta—and all of Canada—need energy storage

    Source: – Press Release/Statement:

    Headline: Why Alberta—and all of Canada—need energy storage

    Energy storage is transforming the way we manage electricity.

    By Vittoria Bellissimo, President & CEO, Canadian Renewable Energy Association 

    There has never been a better time for Alberta—and all of Canada—to invest in energy storage.

    Alberta is currently redesigning its electricity market and transmission policy to deliver more affordable, reliable, clean power to Albertans like me, and energy storage is a key technology that can help us do that.

    That’s why CanREA put together an entire Summit to look at the important role of energy storage in Alberta. We will get updates directly from the source on where Alberta is heading and explore all the ways we can help make our electricity system successful, with a clear focus on energy storage.

    Why energy storage?

    Energy storage is transforming the way we manage electricity—it’s about making our systems smarter, cleaner, and more reliable. With costs dropping significantly, it’s becoming more accessible than ever, providing essential market, grid and flexibility services. The future of energy is here, and I couldn’t be more excited about what’s ahead.

    Worldwide, we are adopting various energy-storage solutions, including batteries, hydrogen, pumped hydro, compressed air, flywheels, and thermal storage.

    While lithium-ion batteries are widely recognized, energy storage goes far beyond them. Innovation is driving new technologies, and companies are deploying advanced systems to strengthen our electricity systems. And the costs are falling fast, making energy storage appealing to ratepayers.

    These technologies allow us to save electricity, or time-shift for future use, helping ensure reliable power. It can also provide other services the grid needs: peak demand management, renewable energy integration, ancillary services, grid stability, frequency regulation, backup power and resilience, and transmission & distribution “non-wires” alternatives.

    In Canada, new energy storage projects—propelled by Indigenous equity partners—are reaching commercial operation ahead of schedule and under budget, showcasing impressive potential for growth in the industry.

    Photo: In less than 15 years, battery costs have fallen by more than 90%, one of the fastest declines ever seen in clean energy technologies. Source: IEA (2024), Batteries and Secure Energy Transitions, IEA, Paris https://www.iea.org/reports/batteries-and-secure-energy-transitions, Licence: CC BY 4.0 

    Enter CanREA’s Summit

    Last year, CanREA kicked off our inaugural Energy Storage Alberta—CanREA Summit 2024 with an expectation of just 75 participants eager for some very nerdy discussion on this very important topic.

    Our overall aim was to answer a few key questions: Are we set up for policy, regulatory and market success for energy storage in Alberta? And if not, what do we need to get there? 

    The answers were lengthy, but in short: we were not quite set up yet—and we still aren’t!—but it was 100% clear that energy storage can provide enormous value to our electricity system. We need to develop viable revenue streams for storage, and reduce the current market, policy and regulatory barriers to make it possible to finance new projects. It turned out that we underestimated the interest in our first Summit: Nearly 200 people attended, with excitement building around prospective projects.  

    This year, we found a bigger room and invited keynote speakers—Alberta Minister of Affordability and Utilities Nathan Neudorf, Alberta Electric System Operator (AESO) CEO Aaron Engen, Innovative Research Group founder and President Greg Lyle—and a curated cast of industry experts.

    This will be our second annual adventure in getting the conditions right for energy storage in Alberta. We are so pleased with the calibre of our presenters, and grateful that they are spending their time and energy with CanREA’s members and Summit participants.

    Key Summit topics

    This year, we want to examine both how to get storage built AND how to operate it efficiently once it is in service.  I’ve mentioned the keynotes, now here are the topics we plan to address:

    What will the new electricity market and transmission policy look like, and how can energy storage navigate both?

    How can energy storage help supply Alberta’s growing population and industries—including data centres?

    What are the main barriers to building energy storage in Alberta, and how do we break them down?

    What can we learn from the global experience in energy storage?

    What are the latest advancements and innovations in energy storage, and how could they apply to Alberta’s electricity system?

    Join me at Energy Storage Alberta 2025

    It is a privilege to work in the renewable energy and energy storage sector in what is arguably the most exciting time in history to be doing so.

    As electricity demand escalates, global supply chains evolve, and the urgency for flexible, scalable, climate-resilient infrastructure intensifies, the power sector and energy storage have never been more crucial.

    I’m looking forward to continuing CanREA’s work to encourage energy storage in Alberta. See you in Calgary on June 3! Check out the details for Energy Storage Alberta—CanREA Summit 2025 here.

    The post Why Alberta—and all of Canada—need energy storage appeared first on Canadian Renewable Energy Association.

    MIL OSI Economics

  • MIL-OSI Global: Mary Dorcey: queer Irish poet illuminates a form of sexuality even the law has overlooked

    Source: The Conversation – UK – By Jack Reid, PhD Candidate in Irish literature, University of Limerick

    Ezhova Mariia/Shutterstock

    It’s the tenth anniversary of the marriage referendum in Ireland on May 22. The first country to legalise same-sex marriage by popular vote, Ireland has transformed itself from a conservative stronghold to a liberal state. This transformation could not have occurred without the important contributions of activists like Mary Dorcey, one of Ireland’s most significant LGBTQ+ writers.

    Dorcey began her political activism in the 1970s, having returned to Ireland after living in France and England. Having met other queer people abroad, Dorcey was struck by the repression that characterised Irish life: “The word ‘homosexual’ was not spoken or written in Ireland before the 1970s. The word ‘gay’ didn’t exist.”

    Determined to break through the silence, Dorcey became a founding member of various activist groups, including the Sexual Liberation Movement at Trinity College Dublin.

    One of Dorcey’s most prominent displays of early activism occurred at the Women’s Week conference at University College Dublin, where she substituted for an absentee speaker. Frustrated by the erasure of homosexuality from Irish life, Dorcey took the stage, quoting the American feminist slogan “if feminism is the theory, lesbianism is the practice”.

    Mary Dorcey discusses the controversy around her statement at Women’s Week.

    A headline appeared on the front page of the Irish Times the following day. It read: “Self-confessed lesbian denounces heterosexuality as sadomasochism.” While the headline caused ruptures at home, Dorcey remained an advocate of queer rights. “I wasn’t going to make any apologies,” she told the Museum of Literature Ireland. “It was their problem if they couldn’t see how beautiful we were.”

    Dorcey’s unwavering commitment to breaking the silence surrounding queerness is clearly displayed in her first poetry collection, Kindling (1982). Poems like Night, for example, are explicit in their bold use of homosexual imagery:

    I ask you then what am I to do with all these memories

    heavy and full?

    Hold them, quiet, between my two hands,

    as I would if I could again

    your hard breasts?

    The collection made waves, with even members of the queer community commenting on its outspokenness. Dorcey has discussed how her unflinching portrayal of homosexuality worried many community members – did her candidness threaten to expose them?

    Despite this, her activist tendencies prevailed, recognising the power of literature to shock readers into sociopolitical awareness, as expressed in poems like Deliberately Personal.

    Deliberately Personal, read by Mary Dorcey.

    One of Dorcey’s most important literary contributions is her short story collection A Noise from the Woodshed (1989). The collection debuted a year after her former Sexual Liberation Movement comrade David Norris’s landmark victory at the European Court of Human Rights, which required Ireland to decriminalise homosexual activity between men.

    Lesbianism was never explicitly illegal in Ireland under its adoption of British legal codes, which feared that writing it into law would introduce otherwise “respectable” women to its existence.

    Dorcey’s overtly lesbian stories are therefore groundbreaking. They depict autonomous women unafraid to voice their lesbian desires. Much of her work responds to the main concerns of the “decriminalisation era”, resulting in a charged critique of traditional Irish life.

    For example, the title story of A Noise from the Woodshed follows a group of lesbians refusing domestic duties to bask in the sensuality of a rural Irish landscape. The collection won the Rooney Prize for Irish Literature a year after its publication.

    Writing desire

    Seven years after Norris’s win, a 1995 referendum signalled further shifts in Irish society. Succeeding by only a whisper, the legalisation of divorce reflected the further weakening influence of the Catholic church, making way for alternative family structures.

    Although Dorcey’s Biography of Desire doesn’t address the referendum directly, its story touches on many of the same issues. The 1997 novel follows the growing relationship between Katherine and Nina. Katherine has left her husband and children to start a new life with Nina.

    While Katherine chooses to only separate from her husband, she is fearful that a judge will grant him full custody of their children because of her lesbian relationship. “Can there be any doubt which of us would be considered the more respectable parent by the law?” she wonders.

    In this regard, the novel anticipates many of the issues that would emerge during the 2015 referendum.


    Looking for something good? Cut through the noise with a carefully curated selection of the latest releases, live events and exhibitions, straight to your inbox every fortnight, on Fridays. Sign up here.


    Biography of Desire also marks an early exploration of bisexuality in Irish literature, with Katherine and Nina’s intense affair leading critics to position the book as one of the first erotic novels in Irish history.

    Dorcey’s commitment to voicing the fluid possibilities of queerness continues with Katerine’s suggestion: “We ought to be bisexual all of us … Men would learn to surrender themselves to pleasures … and women would learn to please themselves … instead of waiting passively.”

    The novel, however, should not be taken as a simplistic disavowal of heterosexuality, but rather aligned with Dorcey’s mission to explore the universality of human love, life and experience.

    While Dorcey is no longer making such a ruckus at public gatherings, she continues to publish, with her influence on queer Irish literature voiced by the likes of Irish Canadian novelist Emma Donoghue and affirmed by her admittance to the prestigious Irish organisation of artists, the Aosdána in 2010.

    Her most recent poetry collection, Life Holds its Breath (2022), testifies to her talents as a writer, and concludes with the poem Banshee, which reflects on her activist days: “We are the women our mothers / warned us about.”

    Jack Reid does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. Mary Dorcey: queer Irish poet illuminates a form of sexuality even the law has overlooked – https://theconversation.com/mary-dorcey-queer-irish-poet-illuminates-a-form-of-sexuality-even-the-law-has-overlooked-256750

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI: Automotive Finco Corp. Announces Loan Extension and Quarterly Cash Dividends

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Not for distribution to United States newswire services or for dissemination in the United States. This news release does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any of the securities in the United States.

    TORONTO, May 22, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Automotive Finco Corp. (NEX: AFCC-H) (the “Company”) is pleased to announce that it has declared quarterly cash dividends of $0.0513 per common share ($0.205 per common share on an annual basis) with the initial dividend payable on July 31, 2025 to shareholders of record as of June 30, 2025. The dividend is an eligible dividend.

    The declaration, timing, amount and payment of future cash dividends are subject to the board of directors’ continuing determination that the payment of dividends is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders and that such dividends comply with all laws and agreements of the Company applicable to the declaration and payment of cash dividends. As such, no assurances can be made that any future dividends will be declared and/or paid.

    Additionally, the Company advises that pursuant to the loan agreement made by Automotive Finance Limited Partnership to AA Finance Co LP (the “Borrower”) on November 18, 2024, the Borrower has elected to extend the loan six months with the maturity date now being November 18, 2025.

    About Automotive Finco Corp.

    Automotive Finco Corp. is a finance company focused exclusively on the auto retail sector. In addition to its interest in Automotive Finance Limited Partnership, the Company may also pursue other direct investments and financing opportunities across the auto retail sector.

    Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

    For further information please refer to the Company’s website at www.autofincocorp.com or contact Shannon Penney, Chief Financial Officer, at shannon.penney@rogers.com or (905) 619-4996.

    Cautionary statement regarding forward-looking information

    Certain disclosures in this release constitute “forward-looking information” within the meaning of Canadian securities legislation. Forward-looking statements are statements that are not historical facts and are generally, but not always, identified by words such as the following: expects, plans, anticipates, believes, intends, will, estimates, projects, assumes, potential and similar expressions. Forward-looking statements also include reference to events or conditions that will, would, may, could or should occur, including, without limitation, statements regarding the Company’s dividend policy and the Company’s intention to pay a quarterly dividend. In making the forward-looking statements in this news release, the Company has applied certain factors and assumptions that the Company believes are reasonable, including, without limitation, that the Company’s financial position will allow it to pay quarterly dividends in accordance with the dividend policy. However, the forward-looking statements in this news release are subject to numerous risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause future results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in such forward-looking statements, including without limitation, that a quarterly dividend will not be payable in accordance with the dividend policy or at all; and those applicable risks, uncertainties and factors set forth in the Company’s disclosure record under the Company’s profile on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca.There can be no assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements and forward- looking information. Readers are cautioned that reliance on such information may not be appropriate for other purposes. The Company does not undertake to update any forward-looking statement, forward-looking information or financial outlook that are incorporated by reference herein, except in accordance with applicable securities laws.

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI Global: Ukraine: it’s clear right now there are no serious plans for peace

    Source: The Conversation – UK – By Jonathan Este, Senior International Affairs Editor, Associate Editor

    When it comes to the sincerity, or otherwise, of Vladimir Putin’s apparent willingness to talk peace with Ukraine, the Russian leader has given us plenty of hints. He may insist he wants to see a deal done and an end to the killing. But his insistence that any agreement would have to address the “root causes” of the war is a clear indication that he hasn’t rowed back from his original maximalist war aims. To whit: no Nato membership, a Kremlin-friendly government in Kyiv, ownership of Crimea and control – preferably annexation – of the four provinces of Ukraine presently under Russian occupation.

    Meanwhile his great ally Dmitry Medvedev continues to insist that there are at present no Ukrainian officials who legitimately qualify as partners for negotiation. The Russian national security council secretary claims that Ukraine is a “failed state” whose leaders’ lack of legitimacy, meanwhile, raise “serious questions” about who Russia can conclude any agreement with.

    So when Donald Trump said this week after a two-hour chat with Putin that Russia and Ukraine would “immediately start negotiations” toward a ceasefire, it’s not clear who he thought the Russian president was planning to talk to if, as Putin and his cronies insist, Zelensky and his team are not legitimate. And, from what he had to say about his recent phone call with Putin, it appears that Trump has his eyes more on the sorts of deals that might be done with Russia once this is all cleared up.

    As he posted on his Truth Social platform after talking with Putin: “Russia wants to do largescale [sic] TRADE with the United States when this catastrophic ‘bloodbath’ is over, and I agree. There is a tremendous opportunity for Russia to create massive amounts of jobs and wealth. Its potential is UNLIMITED.”

    Accordingly, he has backed away from his previous willingness to join Europe in imposing fresh sanctions on Russia. Meanwhile Russia continues to hammer Ukraine both on the battlefield and via ever larger drone and missiles attacks against its civilian population.


    Sign up to receive our weekly World Affairs Briefing newsletter from The Conversation UK. Every Thursday we’ll bring you expert analysis of the big stories in international relations.


    The real clue to Trump’s attitude, writes Stefan Wolff, is the order of phone calls on Monday. Before settling down to talk with Putin, the US president put in a call to the Ukrainian president, Volodymyr Zelensky. Reporting back on the call, Zelensky said he had urged Trump that he mustn’t make any decisions about Ukraine “without us”. Having subsequently spoken at length with Putin, Trump emerged saying in his Truth Social post that Russia and Ukraine will “immediately start negotiations” towards a ceasefire and an end to the war.

    The state of the conflict in Ukraine, May 21 2025.
    Institute for the Study of War

    But Wolff, professor of international security at the University of Birmingham who has written regularly here about the conflict, believes that the fact that Trump added the conditions for peace “will be negotiated between the two parties, as it can only be” suggests he is indeed planning to abandon his peacemaking ambitions. The whole deal was taking far longer than the 24 hours he boasted of during the election campaign last year.

    Where this leaves Europe is unclear, writes Wolff. If it can no longer rely on Washington as a security partner (and the signs aren’t good), then this will require a substantial rethink. Indeed there are signs, with the UK’s recent agreement over security and defence, that minds are increasingly focused on a more self-reliant future. In turn, this has implications for US security. If Europe is compelled to rethink its security relationship with the US it could cut both ways as Washington pivots to face an increasingly aggressive China.




    Read more:
    After another call with Putin, it looks like Trump has abandoned efforts to mediate peace in Ukraine


    Of course, it should have been clear to all concerned not to take Putin at face value over his apparent willingness to talk peace with Zelensky when he failed to turn up to talks in Istanbul at the end of last week. As Natasha Lindstaedt writes here, none of the main players attended the talks, despite plans for Putin, Zelensky and Trump to all meet face-to-face.

    Lindstaedt, an expert in international relations at the University of Essex, describes what for all the world seemed like a bizarre game of bluff – certainly as far as Putin and Trump are concerned. All three leaders had promised to be there, but in the end they all sent intermediaries with the result that nothing of any consequence was agreed. Trump’s aides insisted that if Putin attended he would be there. Then the US president said the reason that Putin hadn’t turned up was because he knew Trump wasn’t going to be there.

    “It’s certainly hard to take peace talks seriously when there is an awkward back-and-forth just about who is going to attend,” Lindstaedt concludes. “And while Trump thinks peace is only possible through bilateral meetings between himself and Putin, it’s clear he can’t even influence Putin to show up to peace talks that the Russian president himself suggested.”




    Read more:
    Putin is testing how far he can push Trump by not turning up for Istanbul talks


    Pie in the sky?

    The US president, meanwhile, has announced plans for an ambitious missile defence system to be called “Golden Dome”. It’s a next-generation system, says Trump, “capable even of intercepting missiles launched from the other side of the world, or launched from space”.

    The plan, for which US$25 billion (£18.6 billion) has been set aside in the US president’s “one big beautiful bill”, presently before the US Congress, calls for a network of surveillance satellites complemented by a separate fleet of offensive satellites that would shoot down offensive missiles soon after lift-off. Trump has estimated this will cost US$175 billion and will be completed by the end of his current four-year term. But other estimates are that it will be much more expensive and take far longer to complete.

    “There has never been anything like this”, the US president said. And indeed there hasn’t, writes Matthew Powell, an expert in air power from the University of Portsmouth. In fact, Powell is deeply sceptical that the technology to enable such an ambitious defence system exists at present. He points to Ronald Reagan’s Strategic Defense Initiative, which became known by critics, with their tongues in their cheeks, as “Star Wars”, which never really got any further than the drawing board.

    It did, however, have the effect of signalling to the Kremlin and the Soviet leader, Mikhail Gorbachev, that the sky would be the limit in terms of US willingness to push the boundaries of defence spending. Powell believes it significantly changed the calculations when it came to the feasibility of continuing the nuclear arms race and may have been responsible for the end of the cold war.




    Read more:
    Golden Dome: what Trump should learn from Reagan’s ‘Star Wars’ missile defence system plan


    Incidentally, the US president’s funding bill scraped through the House of Representatives with 215 votes for and 214 against. In addition to setting aside funds for Golden Dome, the bill, which in its current form adds trillions of dollars to the US debt, has been described by Democrat critics as a “tax scam”. A statement from Democrat leaders said: “This fight is just beginning, and House Democrats will continue to use every tool at our disposal to ensure that the GOP Tax Scam is buried deep in the ground, never to rise again.”

    But how much stomach do the Democrats have for the fight? They’ve had a pretty terrible few months since the election. Their approval rating in March was at 29%, the worst since polling began in 1992. Fernando Pizarro, a lecturer in journalism at City St Georges, University of London, who has several Emmys under his belt for his work on US politics, has cast his eye over some of the leading Democrats who he thinks will spearhead the opposition to the Republicans over the next few years and identifies a few players who could vie for the presidential nomination in 2028.




    Read more:
    The top Democrats leading the fight against Trump’s agenda


    Gaza: situation increasingly desperate

    Meanwhile, after 11 weeks of Israeli blockade of aid to the people of Gaza, limited deliveries have now recommenced in the face of pressure from both the US and increasingly outspoken interventions from the likes of the UK, France and Canada.

    But despite reports that up to 100 trucks are now being allowed into the Gaza Strip, human rights agencies and aid organisations have said that there is a desperate threat of widespread starvation unless the amount of food, fuel and medicine getting through increases exponentially. And fast.

    There is talk of a US-administered programme, the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), which could be up and running by the end of May and could accelerate the delivery of vital supplies to the civilian population while ensuring it does not does not get into the hands of militants or black marketeers.

    But this scheme has its critics, write Sarah Schiffling and Liz Breen, experts in humanitarian logistics and health service operations at Hanken School of Economics and the University of Bradford respectively. They point to a number of flaws, including the plan to concentrate the secure distribution points in southern and central Gaza, forcing large numbers of people to travel considerable distances for supplies.

    The GHF plan also calls for aid distribution to be coordinated with the Israel Defense Forces, which humanitarian organisations says is a “humanitarian cover for a military strategy of control and dispossession”.

    Schiffling and Breen point out that humanitarian organisations have 160,000 pallets of supplies and almost 9,000 aid trucks ready to be dispatched across the border “as soon as Israel allows it”. Whether Israel will allow it is, of course, another question entirely.




    Read more:
    Israel allows a ‘limited’ amount of aid back into Gaza, where the humanitarian situation is desperate


    World Affairs Briefing from The Conversation UK is available as a weekly email newsletter. Click here to get updates directly in your inbox.


    ref. Ukraine: it’s clear right now there are no serious plans for peace – https://theconversation.com/ukraine-its-clear-right-now-there-are-no-serious-plans-for-peace-257388

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI Canada: Grants to grow primary care

    Alberta’s government is investing in made-in-Alberta solutions to strengthen the province’s primary health care system, including Indigenous primary health care. These new grants will support projects that improve access, reduce administrative burdens and support team-based care so all people in Alberta can get the care they need, when and where they need it.

    The grants are being awarded through two innovation-focused programs: the Primary Care Innovation Fund and the Indigenous Primary Health Care Innovation Fund. These funds will support 19 projects that will improve primary care, advance research and innovation and support community health priorities.

    “A strong, reliable primary health care system is the foundation of the entire health system. These strategic investments are helping to make that a reality for families across Alberta. They are especially meaningful for Indigenous communities, as they support culturally safe care that respects traditional knowledge and addresses unique community needs.”

    Adriana LaGrange, Minister of Primary and Preventative Health Services

    “Ensuring Indigenous communities have access to quality primary health care that aligns with their unique needs is a priority for Alberta’s government. The Indigenous Primary Health Care Innovation Fund empowers communities to lead the way in developing solutions that enhance care, support cultural traditions and improve health outcomes for Indigenous Peoples across the province.”

    Rajan Sawhney, Minister of Indigenous Relations

    The $5-million Primary Care Innovation Fund is supporting five projects that will help improve access to care, support early detection of dementia and other conditions, provide post-reproductive care for women, advance research and clinical trials, and harness the potential of artificial intelligence to improve health care services.  

    The $20-million Indigenous Primary Health Care Innovation Fund is supporting 14 community-led initiatives, including virtual care clinics, cultural reconnection, facility upgrades and Elder care. The funding is flexible so Indigenous communities can address their specific priorities and support culturally appropriate care.

    “We are thrilled to announce the approval for the Indigenous Primary Health Care Innovation Fund. We are eager to be providing a welcoming and supportive environment for our Elders. This facility represents a significant investment in our community and is a testament to the growing need of quality care for our Elders.”

    Kathy Lepine, chair, Elizabeth Metis Settlement

    Both of the grant programs stem from a recommendation in the Modernizing Alberta’s Primary Care System (MAPS) final report. MAPS was created to strengthen Alberta’s primary health care system and ensure all people in Alberta have access to timely, appropriate care throughout their lives.

    “University Hospital Foundation is grateful for the Primary Care Innovation Fund that enabled us to match the vision of our donors with talented University of Alberta researchers and health providers. Using a co-design approach, the dementia program will enhance early diagnosis, facilitate more efficient research and improve post-diagnosis care pathways for people living with dementia and their caregivers.”

    Dr. Jodi Abbott, president and CEO, University Hospital Foundation

    “We’re excited to work with Alberta’s primary care teams and innovation partners to build a program grounded in real-world needs – helping them develop the skills and confidence to turn ideas into action and shape the future of care.”

    Theresa Tang, co-founder and CEO, Praxus Health

    Indigenous Support Line

    To further support access to primary care for Indigenous patients and families, the Indigenous Support Line will be expanded to Edmonton and Calgary on June 1. The phone line has supported more than 10,000 callers over the past three years with health system navigation, access to cultural supports, language services and more.

    Operated by Health Link in partnership with the Indigenous Wellness Core, the line connects callers with health professionals who understand Indigenous ways of knowing and traditional healing practices.

    The support line can also be utilized by front-line health care providers to assist in providing culturally appropriate care. Providers can use the support line to learn about cultural support services, Indigenous ways of knowing, traditional healing practices, access to ceremony and other services that may assist their patients.

    “Health Link and Indigenous Wellness Core teams have provided exceptional care to Indigenous Peoples in the north, south and central zones for the past three years through the Indigenous Support Line. The impact of this service is evident in the response from those who have accessed the line, and through it, Indigenous listeners who aid their health care journey. I am thrilled that the line will now be available to Indigenous Peoples and communities across the province.”

    Kim Simmonds, CEO, Primary Care Alberta

    Quick facts

    • Primary Care Innovation Fund grant recipients are:
      • Praxus Health – to develop and deliver a comprehensive primary care innovation training program for health professionals.
      • Arthritis Society of Canada – to implement a cost-effective, AI-enhanced portable infant ultrasound screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip.
      • Dr. Kerry McBrien, University of Calgary – to develop a community health navigator program to enhance team-based care, integrate social and community resources and improve access to care.
      • University Hospital Foundation – to develop and implement an early diagnosis and care pathway for Albertans living with dementia.
      • Dr. Colleen Norris, University of Alberta – to establish the Alberta Women’s Post-Reproductive Health Centre to provide comprehensive primary care for midlife women.
    • Indigenous Primary Health Care Innovation Fund grant recipients include:
      • Samson Cree Nation – to establish the Nipisihkopahk Medical Clinic to provide the community with long-term access to equitable and comprehensive health care services.
      • Elizabeth Metis Settlement – to support the Métis Lifeways Elders Care Initiative, including a comprehensive Elder care facility. 
      • Stoney Nakoda Tsuut’ina Tribal Council Ltd. (G4) – to evaluate the current state of non-insured health benefits coverage and financial implications.
      • Dene Tha’ First Nation – to renovate an existing building and upgrade to a satellite primary health care centre.

    Related information

    • Indigenous primary health care funding – Innovation Fund
    • Modernizing Alberta’s Primary Health Care System (MAPS)

    Related Media

    • Opening more doors to primary care (April 10, 2025)
    • Leading primary care into the future (Oct. 15, 2024)
    • Strengthening health care: Improving access for all (Oct. 18, 2023)

    MIL OSI Canada News

  • MIL-OSI Canada: Provinces Renew Commitment to Veterinary Training in Western Canada

    Source: Government of Canada regional news

    Released on May 22, 2025

    Saskatchewan, British Columbia and Manitoba have renewed their financial commitment to the University of Saskatchewan’s Western College of Veterinary Medicine (WCVM), continuing a long-standing interprovincial agreement that has been in place for six decades.

    The renewed agreement provides more than $194 million to the WCVM over the next five years, helping ensure the college can deliver critical veterinary medicine programming, research and clinical services that address the needs of each province.

    “We are proud of the Western College of Veterinary Medicine and the exceptional education opportunities it provides to veterinary students from across Western Canada,” Saskatchewan Advanced Education Minister Ken Cheveldayoff said. “We are grateful to have this internationally recognized college right here in Saskatchewan and are fully confident in USask’s ability to produce highly skilled veterinarians to care for both our livestock and companion animals.”

    “Our partnership is a great example of how provinces can work collaboratively to achieve our shared priorities and economic goals,” Manitoba Advanced Education and Training Minister Renée Cable said. “We are pleased that this partnership creates opportunities for our students to access high-quality education right here in Western Canada. Communities across Manitoba benefit from the caliber of veterinarians that graduate from the program.”

    “We are proud to continue this longstanding interprovincial partnership to provide world-class veterinary medicine education,” British Columbia Post-Secondary Education and Future Skills Minister Anne Kang said. “This agreement ensures that our communities have access to skilled professionals who play a significant role in animal health, food security and public wellbeing.”

    The WCVM is a leading centre of veterinary education, research and expertise in Western Canada, serving the needs of the livestock, fowl and fisheries industries, pet owners, and public health and food safety networks. The college is internationally accredited and includes a veterinary medical centre, a provincial diagnostic laboratory, and large-scale research facilities that serve as resources for both students and professionals across the region.

    “Ongoing financial support from the Governments of Saskatchewan, Manitoba and British Columbia has played a vital role in maintaining the WCVM’s reputation as a centre for excellence in education, research and clinical services,” WCVM Dean Dr. Gillian Muir said. “We look forward to working together with the college’s funding partners on strategies that address Western Canada’s increasing need for veterinarians and animals health care services.”

    The new interprovincial agreement is in place until 2030. For more information about the Western College of Veterinary Medicine, visit: www.wcvm.usask.ca.

    -30-

    For more information, contact:

    Media Relations
    Advanced Education
    Regina
    Phone: 306-520-2572
    Email: ae.media@gov.sk.ca

    Victoria Dinh
    Media Relations
    USask
    Phone: 306-966-5487
    Email: victoria.dinh@usask.ca

    Seina Cho
    Media Relations
    Post-Secondary Education and Future Skills
    British Columbia
    Phone: 250-889-9334

    Ryan Jamula
    Media Relations
    Advanced Education and Training
    Manitoba
    Phone: 431-323-4873
    Email: ryan.jamula@manitoba.ca

    MIL OSI Canada News

  • MIL-OSI Canada: Prime Minister Carney speaks with Prime Minister of Poland Donald Tusk

    Source: Government of Canada – Prime Minister

    Today, the Prime Minister, Mark Carney, spoke with the Prime Minister of Poland, Donald Tusk.

    Prime Minister Tusk congratulated Prime Minister Carney on his election. The prime ministers discussed shared priorities, including Euro-Atlantic security, co-operation within NATO, and support for a just and lasting peace in Ukraine.

    The leaders emphasized deepening bilateral and commercial ties between Canada and Poland, and agreed to remain in close contact.

    Associated Link

    MIL OSI Canada News

  • MIL-OSI Canada: G7 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors conclude productive meeting in Banff

    Source: Government of Canada News (2)

    May 22, 2025 – Banff, Alberta – Department of Finance Canada

    Today, G7 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors concluded their meeting in Banff, Alberta, which is part of Canada’s 2025 G7 Presidency. The Honourable François-Philippe Champagne, Minister of Finance and National Revenue, and Tiff Macklem, Governor of the Bank of Canada, co-chaired the meeting.

    Ministers and Governors reached agreement on a communiqué which emphasized, above all, the the importance of G7 unity in the face of complex global challenges. In advance of the Leaders’ Summit next month in Kananaskis, Alberta, the meeting included a productive and frank exchange on the global economy, unsustainable global imbalances, and ways to promote growth and productivity.

    Ministers and Governors agreed to:

    • a G7 Financial Crime Call to Action to spur further concrete progress in tackling financial crime, including money laundering and terrorist financing. Canada will contribute $4.8 million in new technical assistance to developing economies so they can contribute to this effort;
    • support the expansion of the World Bank-led Resilient and Inclusive Supply-Chain Enhancement (RISE) Partnership to strengthen the integration of developing countries into critical minerals supply chains. Canada will contribute $20 million to support the expansion of the RISE Partnership, including in Latin America and the Caribbean;
    • address risks stemming from the large increase in low-value shipments imported into G7 markets; and
    • continued unwavering support to Ukraine, an agreement to continue to explore all possible options to hold Russia to account, including further ramping up sanctions, as well as efforts to foster private sector participation in the recovery and reconstruction of Ukraine.

    Canada is a stable, reliable, and innovative partner with a wealth of natural resources and expertise. Through our G7 Presidency, we will shape the global agenda – working with allies and partners to grow our economies, defend Canadians’ interests, and address the most pressing global challenges.

    MIL OSI Canada News

  • MIL-OSI Canada: Minister Hodgson to Provide Keynote Address in Calgary

    Source: Government of Canada News

    CALGARY — The Minister of Energy and Natural Resources, the Honourable Tim Hodgson, will provide a keynote address and take part in a fireside chat with the Calgary Chamber of Commerce. 

    Date: Friday, May 23, 2025

    Time: 8 a.m. MT

    Location:
    Fairmont Palliser
    Crystal Ballroom
    133 9th Avenue SW
    Calgary, Alberta T2P 2M3

    All accredited media are asked to pre-register by emailing media@calgarychamber.com.

    MIL OSI Canada News

  • MIL-OSI: Thrive Ranked #10 in Boston Business Journal’s 2025 Fast 50

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    BOSTON, May 22, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Thrive, a global technology outsourcing provider for cybersecurity, Cloud, and traditional managed service provider (MSP) services, announced today that it was ranked #10 in the Boston Business Journal’s 2025 Fast 50. This marks the fifth consecutive year Thrive has been named as one of the fastest-growing private companies in Massachusetts, and the second year in a row it has placed in the top 10.

    Thrive works with leading organizations to ensure their digital transformations are secure, cost-effective, and future-ready. By offering a variety of services and solutions that address today’s most critical cybersecurity and technology gaps, Thrive gives businesses customized services to meet their unique business needs and allows them to focus on what they do best. This approach has led to continued growth for Thrive. The company has completed 17 acquisitions in the last 5 years and now employs over 1,450 people across the U.S., UK, Canada, and APAC regions.

    “By offering world-class service coupled with NextGen solutions to solve some of the most prominent challenges organizations are facing, Thrive has found a winning formula that has allowed us to continue to grow, expand our national and international footprint, innovate, and hire the best talent,” said Bill McLaughlin, Thrive’s CEO. “Thrive’s remarkable growth is the direct result of the hard work of our employees in the Boston region and beyond. This team has propelled us to reach new heights – and we’re not done yet.”

    The BBJ Fast 50 ranks companies based on revenue growth from 2021 to 2024, recognizing businesses that have demonstrated strong leadership, innovation, and resilience in a dynamic economic landscape. The final list was revealed at an awards ceremony on May 13, celebrating the companies helping to drive Boston’s economic momentum.

    To learn more, visit Thrive’s website. If you’re interested in working for Thrive’s award-winning team, visit Thrive’s careers page.

    About Thrive  
    Thrive delivers global technology outsourcing for cybersecurity, Cloud, networking, and other complex IT requirements. Thrive’s NextGen platform enables customers to increase business efficiencies through standardization, scalability, and automation, delivering oversized technology returns on investment (ROI). They accomplish this with advisory services, vCISO, vCIO, consulting, project implementation, solution architects, and a best-in-class subscription-based technology platform. Thrive delivers exceptional high-touch service through its POD approach of subject matter experts and global 24x7x365 SOC, NOC, and centralized services teams. Learn more at www.thrivenextgen.com or follow us on LinkedIn.  

    Thrive Contact:  
    Hannah Johnston
    thrive@v2comms.com  

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI Global: FDA will approve COVID-19 vaccine only for older adults and high-risk groups – a public health expert explains the new rules

    Source: The Conversation – USA – By Libby Richards, Professor of Nursing, Purdue University

    Older adults will continue to receive yearly COVID-19 shots, but lower-risk groups will not, says the FDA. dusanpetkovic via iStock / Getty Images Plus

    On May 20, 2025, the Food and Drug Administration announced a new stance on who should receive the COVID-19 vaccine.

    The agency said it would approve new versions of the vaccine only for adults 65 years of age and older as well as for people with one or more risk factors for severe COVID-19 outcomes. These risk factors include medical conditions such as asthma, cancer, chronic kidney disease, heart disease and diabetes.

    However, healthy younger adults and children who fall outside of these groups may not be eligible to receive the COVID-19 shot this fall. Vaccine manufacturers will have to conduct clinical trials to demonstrate that the vaccine benefits low-risk groups.

    FDA Commissioner Martin Makary and the agency’s head of vaccines, Vinay Prasad, described the new framework in an article published in the New England Journal of Medicine and in a public webcast.

    The Conversation U.S. asked Libby Richards, a nursing professor involved in public health promotion, to explain why the changes were made and what they mean for the general public.

    Why did the FDA diverge from past practice?

    Until the May 20 announcement, getting a yearly COVID-19 vaccine was recommended for everyone ages 6 months and older, regardless of their health risk.

    According to Makary and Prasad, the Food and Drug Administration is moving away from these universal recommendations and instead taking a risk-based approach based on its interpretation of public health trends – specifically, the declining COVID-19 booster uptake, a lack of strong evidence that repeated boosters improve health outcomes for healthy people and the fact that natural immunity from past COVID-19 infections is widespread.

    The FDA states it wants to ensure the vaccine is backed by solid clinical trial data, especially for low-risk groups.

    Was this a controversial decision or a clear consensus?

    The FDA’s decision to adopt a risk-based framework for the COVID-19 vaccine aligns with the expected recommendations from the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, an advisory group of vaccine experts offering expert guidance to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on vaccine policy, which is scheduled to meet in June 2025. But while this advisory committee was also expected to recommend allowing low-risk people to get annual COVID-19 vaccines if they want to, the FDA’s policy will likely make that difficult.

    Although the FDA states that its new policy aims to promote greater transparency and evidenced-based decision-making, the change is controversial – in part because it circumvents the usual process for evaluating vaccine recommendations. The FDA is enacting this policy change by limiting its approval of the vaccine to high-risk groups, and it is doing so without any new data supporting its decision. Usually, however, the FDA broadly approves a vaccine based on whether it is safe and effective, and decisions on who should be eligible to receive it are left to the CDC, which receives research-based guidance from the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices.

    Change is coming to COVID-19 vaccine policy.
    Rock Obst, CC BY-SA

    Additionally, FDA officials point to Canada, Australia and some European countries that limit vaccine recommendations to older adults and other high-risk people as a model for its revised framework. But vaccine strategies vary widely, and this more conservative approach has not necessarily proven superior. Also, those countries have universal health care systems and have a track record of more equitable access to COVID-19 care and better COVID-19 outcomes.

    Another question is how health officials’ positions on COVID-19 vaccines affect public perception. Makary and Prasad noted that COVID-19 vaccination campaigns may have actually eroded public trust in vaccination. But some vaccine experts have expressed concerns that limiting COVID-19 vaccine access might further fuel vaccine hesitancy because any barrier to vaccine access can reduce uptake and hinder efforts to achieve widespread immunity.

    What conditions count as risk factors?

    The New England Journal of Medicine article includes a lengthy list of conditions that increase the risk of severe COVID-19 and notes that about 100 million to 200 million people will fall into this category and will thus be eligible to get the vaccine.

    Pregnancy is included. Some items on the list, however, are unclear. For example, the list includes asthma, but the data that asthma is a risk factor for severe COVID-19 is scant.

    Also on the list is physical inactivity, which likely applies to a vast swath of Americans and is difficult to define. Studies have found links between regular physical activity and reduced risk of severe COVID-19 infection, but it’s unclear how health care providers will define and measure physical inactivity when assessing a patient’s eligibility for COVID-19 vaccines.

    Most importantly, the list leaves out an important group – caregivers and household members of people at high risk of severe illness from COVID-19 infection. This omission leaves high-risk people more vulnerable to exposure to COVID-19 from healthy people they regularly interact with. Multiple countries the new framework refers to do include this group.

    Why is the FDA requiring new clinical trials?

    According to the FDA, the benefits of multiple doses of COVID-19 vaccines for healthy adults are currently unproven. It’s true that studies beyond the fourth vaccine dose are scarce. However, multiple studies have demonstrated that the vaccine is effective at preventing the risk of severe COVID-19 infection, hospitalization and death in low-risk adults and children. Receiving multiple doses of COVID-19 vaccines has also been shown to reduce the risk of long COVID.

    The FDA is moving to risk-based access for COVID-19 vaccines.

    The FDA is requiring vaccine manufactures to conduct additional large randomized clinical trials to further evaluate the safety and effectiveness of COVID-19 boosters for healthy adults and children. These trials will primarily test whether the vaccines prevent symptomatic infections, and secondarily whether they prevent hospitalization and death. Such trials are more complex, costly and time-consuming than the more common approach of testing for immunological response.

    This requirement will likely delay both the timeliness and the availability of COVID-19 vaccine boosters and slow public health decision-making.

    Will low-risk people be able to get a COVID-19 shot?

    Not automatically. Under the new FDA framework, healthy adults who wish to receive the fall COVID-19 vaccine will face obstacles. Health care providers can administer vaccines “off-label”, but insurance coverage is widely based on FDA recommendations. The new, narrower FDA approval will likely reduce both access to COVID-19 vaccines for the general public and insurance coverage for COVID-19 vaccines.

    The FDA’s focus on individual risks and benefits may overlook broader public health benefits. Communities with higher vaccination rates have fewer opportunities to spread the virus.

    What about vaccines for children?

    High-risk children age 6 months and older who have conditions that increase the risk of severe COVID-19 are still eligible for the vaccine under the new framework. As of now, healthy children age 6 months and older without underlying medical conditions will not have routine access to COVID-19 vaccines until further clinical trial data is available.

    Existing vaccines already on the market will remain available, but it is unclear how long they will stay authorized and how the change will affect childhood vaccination overall.

    Libby Richards has received funding from the National Institutes of Health, the American Nurses Foundation, and the Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute

    ref. FDA will approve COVID-19 vaccine only for older adults and high-risk groups – a public health expert explains the new rules – https://theconversation.com/fda-will-approve-covid-19-vaccine-only-for-older-adults-and-high-risk-groups-a-public-health-expert-explains-the-new-rules-257226

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI Global: Why gait quality matters as you age

    Source: The Conversation – UK – By Helen Dawes, Professor of Clinical Rehabilitation, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter

    Studio Romantic/Shutterstock

    Walking is one of the most important things we do for our quality of life. In fact, research shows it contributes more than any other physical activity to how well we live day to day. Yet one in three people over the age of 60 report having some difficulty walking.

    As we age, gradual changes in our bodies and health can alter how we walk, often without us realising. But the way we walk, known as our gait pattern, matters more than we might think. Poor gait doesn’t just make walking harder and more tiring; it can lead to joint strain, instability, and a greater risk of falls.

    Think of your gait like a heart rhythm. Just as an electrocardiogram (ECG) shows whether your heart is functioning properly, your gait also has a rhythm. When that rhythm is off, it may be one of the earliest signs that you’re not ageing as well as you could be.

    Thanks to new technology, we can now measure gait quality more easily and precisely. One promising tool is the Heel2Toe wearable sensor. This small device attaches to your shoe and tracks the movement of your ankle as you walk, capturing your gait cycle in real time.


    Get your news from actual experts, straight to your inbox. Sign up to our daily newsletter to receive all The Conversation UK’s latest coverage of news and research, from politics and business to the arts and sciences.


    A healthy step begins with a strong heel strike. Your weight then rolls across the sole of your foot, ending with a push-off from the toes. As your foot lifts, it swings forward cleanly – no dragging or scuffing. This smooth sequence creates a rhythm in your ankle movements, one that, when consistent, resembles a kind of “walking ECG”.

    But over time, many people unconsciously adopt less efficient movement patterns. These altered gaits may feel normal, but they’re often unstable, tiring or unsafe.

    Poor gait can increase the risk of falls.
    https://www.shutterstock.com/image-photo/asian-senior-male-falling-on-ground-2147078055

    Poor gait reduces confidence, increases fall risk, and can discourage people from walking at all. And the less we walk, the weaker our muscles become – making the problem worse. It’s a vicious cycle.

    Relearning to walk well

    The good news is that we can retrain our gait.

    The Heel2Toe sensor doesn’t just monitor your movements – it also encourages better walking. When it detects a good step (one that begins with a strong heel strike), it delivers an audio cue as positive feedback. Over time, these cues help you rediscover a stronger, steadier walking pattern. Good gait becomes your new normal. Tools like Heel2Toe help people tune in to their body’s signals and make sustainable progress.

    The goal isn’t just to move more – it’s to move better.

    Of course, being physically active is only one aspect of what it means to live well as we grow older.

    To get a more complete picture of healthy ageing researchers have developed a tool that measures how often older adults experience key aspects of wellbeing. This tool – the Opal measure (Older Persons for Active Living) – goes beyond tracking what people do. It asks how they feel about their lives.

    Opal can help people understand their own wellbeing and it offers policymakers and communities a way to evaluate how well their services support older citizens – not just physically, but socially and emotionally too.

    For people, this means that even small improvements, like better gait, can lead to meaningful changes in how you feel: more confident, more mobile and more independent.

    For communities, it’s a reminder that promoting physical activity is important – but not enough. We also need programs, spaces and services that foster connection, purpose, creativity and joy.

    What does ‘active living’ really mean?

    In a 2024 international study, older adults in Canada, UK, US and the Netherlands shared what “active living” means to them – across four languages and cultural contexts.

    They identified 17 distinct “ways of being” that contribute to feeling active. Physical health was just one part. Others included feeling: confident, connected, creative, energised, encouraged, engaged, happy, mentally healthy, independent, interested, mentally sharp, motivated, resilient and self-sufficient.

    In other words, active living isn’t just about taking (or counting) steps, it’s about how you feel while taking them.

    Ageing is inevitable. But ageing well? That’s something we can shape – step by step.

    Helen Dawes is Director of International Affairs of PhysioBiometrics Inc. she receives funding from NIHR Exeter Biomedical Resarch Council and NIHR Exeter Sustainable Health Technology Centre.

    Nancy Mayo is co-founder and President of PhysioBiometrics Inc. a company that commercializes the Heel2Toe sensor to make it available for all. She has received funding from Healthy Brains for Health Lives (HBHL), McGill University, to develop and test the Heel2Toe sensor.

    ref. Why gait quality matters as you age – https://theconversation.com/why-gait-quality-matters-as-you-age-256636

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI: Computer Modelling Group Announces Year-End Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    CALGARY, Alberta, May 22, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Computer Modelling Group Ltd. (“CMG Group” or the “Company”) announces its financial results for the three months and year ended March 31, 2025, and the approval by its Board of Directors (the “Board”) of the payment of a cash dividend of $0.05 per Common Share for the fourth quarter ended March 31, 2025.

    FOURTH QUARTER 2025 CONSOLIDATED HIGHLIGHTS

    Select financial highlights

    • Total revenue increased by 4% (13% Organic decline(1) and 17% growth from acquisitions) to $33.7 million;
    • Recurring revenue(2) increased by 16% (7% Organic decline and 23% growth from acquisitions) to $24.2 million;
    • Adjusted EBITDA(1) increased by 2% to $10.5 million;
    • Adjusted EBITDA Margin(1) was 31%, compared to 32% in the comparative period;
    • Earnings per share was $0.06, a 33% decrease;
    • Free Cash Flow(1) decreased by 26% to $7.0 million; Free Cash flow per share decreased to $0.08 from $0.12.

    FISCAL 2025 CONSOLIDATED HIGHLIGHTS

    Select financial highlights

    • Total revenue increased by 19% (1% Organic decline and 20% growth from acquisitions) to $129.4 million;
    • Recurring revenue increased by 13% (1% Organic growth and 12% was growth from acquisitions) to $86.8 million;
    • Adjusted EBITDA increased by 2% to $44.0 million;
    • Adjusted EBITDA Margin was 34%, compared to 40% in the comparative period;
    • Earnings per share was $0.27, a 16% decrease;
    • Free Cash Flow decreased by 22% to $27.6 million; Free Cash flow per share decreased to $0.33 from $0.44.

    (1) Organic growth/decline, Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA Margin and Free Cash Flow are not standardized financial measures and might not be comparable to measures disclosed by other issuers. For more description see under “Non-IFRS Financial and Supplementary Financial Measures” heading.
    (2) Recurring revenue includes Annuity/maintenance licenses and Annuity license fee, and excludes Perpetual licenses and Professional Services.

    OVERVIEW

    Macroeconomic factors and political instability, combined with a low oil price environment, resulted in challenged organic growth this year, particularly in reservoir and production solutions, where lengthened deal cycles and cautious customer spending prevailed. Despite these challenges, we continued to execute on our strategic M&A roadmap, and revenue growth during the quarter and year-to-date, was supported by meaningful contributions from acquisitions. Adjusted EBITDA increases during the quarter and year-to-date were also supported by growth from acquisitions. Free Cash Flow decreased during the quarter and year-to-date due to pressures on top-line-growth, however, during the prior year period, Free Cash Flow also benefited from the tax deduction of approximately $4.6 million as a result of the acquisition of intellectual property. We generated $27.6 million of Free Cash Flow during fiscal 2025, maintaining our strong liquidity position and enabling us to invest in strategic acquisitions.

    As we look forward to fiscal 2026, excluding any impact from future acquisitions, we anticipate a reduction of between $6 – $7 million in professional services revenue compared to fiscal 2025 which may make it challenging to demonstrate total revenue growth. It is a goal of the company to shift the revenue mix towards a higher percentage of software revenue and the reduction in professional services is a natural part of the shift. Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Margin may also show limited growth due to anticipated delays in cost-saving measures in taking effect, but this impact is expected to be limited to fiscal 2026.

    To ensure long-term resilience, we remain committed to evolving our business model through carefully targeted strategic acquisitions. Our acquisitions to date position us well by expanding our capabilities and helping to support long-term growth by complementing our core offering.

    SUMMARY OF FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE

         
      Three months ended March 31, Year ended March 31,
    ($ thousands, except per share data) 2025 2024 % change   2025 2024 % change  
    Annuity/maintenance licenses 19,436 19,661 (1 %) 77,525 71,530 8 %
    Annuity license fee 4,728 1,142 314 % 9,280 5,146 80 %
    Recurring revenue(1) (2) 24,164 20,803 16 % 86,805 76,676 13 %
    Perpetual licenses 554 2,130 (74 %) 5,617 5,739 (2 %)
    Total software license revenue 24,718 22,933 8 % 92,422 82,415 12 %
    Professional services 8,965 9,358 (4 %) 37,024 26,264 41 %
    Total revenue 33,683 32,291 4 % 129,446 108,679 19 %
    Cost of revenue 6,749 6,470 4 % 24,940 17,224 45 %
    Operating expenses                
    Sales & marketing 5,094 4,361 17 % 18,617 14,957 24 %
    Research and development 8,129 7,607 7 % 30,142 23,679 27 %
    General & administrative 4,876 5,576 (13 %) 21,599 18,835 15 %
    Operating expenses 18,099 17,544 3 % 70,358 57,471 22 %
    Operating profit 8,835 8,277 7 % 34,148 33,984 %
    Net income 5,104 7,229 (29 %) 22,437 26,259 (15 %)
    Adjusted EBITDA (1) 10,500 10,295 2 % 44,009 43,345 2 %
    Adjusted EBITDA Margin (1) 31% 32%     34% 40%    
                     
    Earnings per share – basic & diluted 0.06 0.09 (33 %) 0.27 0.32 (16 %)
    Funds flow from operations per share – basic 0.10 0.13 (23 %) 0.38 0.47 (19 %)
    Free Cash Flow per share – basic (1) 0.08 0.12 (33 %) 0.33 0.44 (25 %)

    (1) Non-IFRS financial measures are defined in the “Non-IFRS Financial Measures” section. 
    (2) Included in the number is a reduction of $0.5 million and $0.8 million for the three months and year ended March 31, 2025, respectively ($0.1 million and $0.2 million for the three months and year ended March 31, 2024, respectively), attributed to the amortization of a deferred revenue fair value reduction recognized on acquisition.

    Q4 2025 Dividend

    Computer Modelling Group’s Board approved a cash dividend of $0.05 per Common Share. The dividend will be paid on June 13, 2025, to shareholders of record at the close of business on June 5, 2025.

    All dividends paid by Computer Modelling Group Ltd. to holders of Common Shares in the capital of the Company will be treated as eligible dividends within the meaning of such term in section 89(1) of the Income Tax Act (Canada), unless otherwise indicated.

    NON-IFRS FINANCIAL MEASURES AND RECONCILIATION OF NON-IFRS MEASURES

    Free Cash Flow Reconciliation to Funds Flow from Operations

    Free cash flow is a non-IFRS financial measure that is calculated as funds flow from operations less capital expenditures and repayment of lease liabilities. Free Cash Flow per share is calculated by dividing free cash flow by the number of weighted average outstanding shares during the period. Management believes that this measure provides useful supplemental information about operating performance and liquidity, as it represents cash generated during the period, regardless of the timing of collection of receivables and payment of payables, which may reduce comparability between periods. Management uses free cash flow and free cash flow per share to help measure the capacity of the Company to pay dividends and invest in business growth opportunities.

      Fiscal 2024 Fiscal 2025
    ($ thousands, unless otherwise stated) Q1   Q2   Q3   Q4   Q1   Q2   Q3   Q4  
    Funds flow from operations 7,920   11,491   8,477   10,367   6,515   7,101   9,937   8,227  
    Capital expenditures (45 ) (51 ) (459 ) (95 ) (93 ) (236 ) (432 ) (661 )
    Repayment of lease liabilities (412 ) (412 ) (728 ) (803 ) (743 ) (769 ) (689 ) (549 )
    Free Cash Flow 7,463   11,028   7,290   9,469   5,679   6,096   8,816   7,017  
    Weighted average shares – basic (thousands) 80,685   80,834   81,067   81,314   81,476   81,887   82,753   83,064  
    Free Cash Flow per share – basic 0.09   0.14   0.09   0.12   0.07   0.07   0.11   0.08  
    Funds flow from operations per share- basic 0.10   0.14   0.10   0.13   0.08   0.09   0.12   0.10  

    Free Cash Flow decreased by 26% and 22%, respectively, for the three months and year ended March 31, 2025 from the same periods of the previous fiscal year. These decreases are primarily due to lower funds flow from operations, higher capital expenditures, and increased repayment of lease liabilities as a result of office leases in acquired entities. During year ended March 31, 2024, Free Cash Flow benefited from the tax deduction of approximately $4.6 million as a result of the acquisition of the BHV intellectual property.

    Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Margin

      Three months ended
    March 31,
    Year ended
    March 31,
    ($ thousands) 2025   2024   2025   2024  

    Net income (loss)

    5,104

     

    7,229

     

    22,437

     

    26,259

     
    Add (deduct):                
    Depreciation and amortization 2,368   2,151   8,465   5,688  
    Acquisition costs 216   186   2,567   1,456  
    Stock-based compensation (435 ) 922   2,625   6,292  
    Loss on contingent consideration 88     2,151    
    Deferred revenue amortization on acquisition fair value reduction 535   76   845   188  
    Income and other tax expense 2,154   1,935   10,448   8,963  
    Interest income (313 ) (658 ) (2,605 ) (3,096 )
    Interest expense 189     189    
    Foreign exchange loss (gain) 1,143   (743 ) (363 ) (50 )
    Repayment of lease liabilities (549 ) (803 ) (2,750 ) (2,355 )
    Adjusted EBITDA (1) 10,500   10,295   44,009   43,345  
    Adjusted EBITDA Margin (1) 31 % 32 % 34 % 40 %

    (1) This is a non-IFRS financial measure. Refer to definition of the measures above.

    Adjusted EBITDA increased by 2% during the three months ended March 31, 2025, compared to the same period of the previous year, of which 20% was growth from acquisitions, partially offset by an Organic decline of 18%, primarily attributable to lower revenue in the quarter partially offset by lower expenses.

    Adjusted EBITDA increased by 2% for the year ended March 31, 2025, compared to the same period of the previous year, of which 3% of the increase was due to growth from acquisitions, partially offset by a 1% Organic decline due to higher expenses.

    Organic Growth

    Organic growth is not a standardized financial measure and might not be comparable to measures disclosed by other issuers. The Company measures Organic growth on a quarterly and year-to-date basis at the revenue and Adjusted EBITDA levels and includes revenue and Adjusted EBITDA under CMG Group’s ownership for a year or longer, beginning from the first full quarter of CMG Group’s ownership in the current and comparative period(s). For example, BHV was acquired on September 25, 2023 (Q2 2024). September 25, 2024, marked one full year of ownership under CMG Group and on October 1, 2024 (Q3 2025), which is the first full quarter under CMG Group’s ownership in the current and comparative period, started being tracked under Organic growth. Any revenue and Adjusted EBITDA generated by BHV prior to October 1, 2024, would not be included in Organic growth. Sharp was acquired on November 12, 2025 (Q3 2025) and will start contributing to Organic growth on January 1, 2026 (Q4 2026).

    For further clarity, current statements include Organic growth from the following:

    • CMG revenue and Adjusted EBITDA; and
    • BHV revenue and Adjusted EBITDA generated beginning on October 1, 2024.

    Recurring Revenue
    Recurring revenue represents the revenue recognized during the period from contracts that are recurring in nature and includes revenue recognized as “Annuity/maintenance licenses” and “Annuity license fee”. We believe that Recurring revenue is an indicator of business expansion and provides management with visibility into our ability to generate predictable cash flows.

    The table below reconciles Recurring revenue to total revenue for the periods indicated.

      Three months ended March 31, Year ended March 31,
      2025 2024 % change   2025 2024 % change  
    ($ thousands)                
    Annuity/maintenance licenses 19,436 19,661 (1% ) 77,525 71,530 8 %
    Annuity license fee 4,728 1,142 314 % 9,280 5,146 80 %
    Recurring revenue(1) (2) 24,164 20,803 16 % 86,805 76,676 13 %
    Perpetual licenses 554 2,130 (74 %) 5,617 5,739 (2 %)
    Total software license revenue 24,718 22,933 8 % 92,422 82,415 12 %
    Professional services 8,965 9,358 (4 %) 37,024 26,264 41 %
    Total revenue 33,683 32,291 4 % 129,446 108,679 19 %

    (1) This is a non-IFRS financial measure.
    (2) Included in the number is a reduction of $0.5 million and $0.8 million for the three months and year ended March 31, 2025, respectively ($0.1 million and $0.2 million for the three months and year ended March 31, 2024, respectively), attributed to the amortization of a deferred revenue fair value reduction recognized on acquisition.

    Consolidated Statements of Financial Position

      March 31, 2025   March 31, 2024   April 1, 2023  
    (thousands of Canadian $)            

    Assets

               
    Current assets:            
    Cash 43,884   63,083   66,850  
    Restricted cash         362   142    
    Trade and other receivables 41,457   36,550   23,910  
    Prepaid expenses 2,572   2,321   1,060  
    Prepaid income taxes 1,641   3,841   444  
      89,916   105,937   92,264  
    Intangible assets 59,955   23,683   1,321  
    Right-of-use assets 28,443   29,072   30,733  
    Property and equipment 10,157   9,877   10,366  
    Goodwill 15,814   4,399    
    Deferred tax asset 471     2,444  
    Total assets 204,756   172,968   137,128  

    Liabilities and shareholders’ equity

               
    Current liabilities:            
    Trade payables and accrued liabilities 18,452   18,551   11,126  
    Income taxes payable 2,667   2,136   33  
    Acquisition holdback payable 188   2,292    
    Acquisition earnout 3,864      
    Deferred revenue 40,276   41,120   34,797  
    Lease liabilities 2,278   2,566   1,829  
    Government loan 310      
      68,035   66,665   47,785  
    Lease liabilities 34,668   34,395   36,151  
    Stock-based compensation liabilities 256   624   742  
    Government loan 1,319      
    Acquisition earnout   1,503    
    Acquisition holdback payable 1,257      
    Other long-term liabilities 212   305    
    Deferred tax liabilities 13,102   1,661    
    Total liabilities 118,849   105,153   84,678  

    Shareholders’ equity:

               
    Share capital 94,849   87,304   81,820  
    Contributed surplus 15,460   15,667   15,471  
    Cumulative translation adjustment 4,326   (367 )  
    Deficit (28,728 ) (34,789 ) (44,841 )
    Total shareholders’ equity 85,907   67,815   52,450  
    Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity 204,756   172,968   137,128  

    Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income

    Years ended March 31,
    (thousands of Canadian $ except per share amounts)

    2025  

    2024

     
    Revenue
    129,446
      108,679  
    Cost of revenue 24,940   17,224  
    Gross profit 104,506   91,455  

    Operating expenses

           
    Sales and marketing 18,617   14,957  
    Research and development 30,142   23,679  
    General and administrative 21,599   18,835  
      70,358   57,471  
    Operating profit 34,148   33,984  

    Finance income

    2,968

     

    3,146

     
    Finance costs (2,080 ) (1,908 )
    Change in fair value of contingent consideration (2,151 )  
    Profit before income and other taxes 32,885   35,222  
    Income and other taxes 10,448   8,963  

    Net income

    22,437

     

    26,259

     

    Other comprehensive income:
           
    Foreign currency translation adjustment 4,693   (367 )
    Other comprehensive income 4,693   (367 )
    Total comprehensive income 27,130   25,892  
    Net income per share – basic
    0.2
    7
      0.32  
    Net income per share – diluted 0.27   0.32  
    Dividend per share 0.20   0.20  

    Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

    Years ended March 31,
    (thousands of Canadian $)

    2025

     

    2024

     

    Operating activities

           
    Net income 22,437   26,259  
    Adjustments for:        
    Depreciation and amortization of property, equipment, right-of use assets 4,756   4,187  
    Amortization of intangible assets 3,709   1,501  
    Deferred income tax expense (recovery) (776 ) 3,518  
    Stock-based compensation (1,297 ) 2,795  
    Foreign exchange and other non-cash items 800   (5 )
    Change in fair value of contingent consideration 2,151    
    Funds flow from operations 31,780   38,255  
    Movement in non-cash working capital:        
    Trade and other receivables (527 ) (6,697 )
    Trade payables and accrued liabilities (818 ) 2,618  
    Prepaid expenses and other assets (169 ) (1,183 )
    Income taxes receivable (payable) 2,421   (1,826 )
    Deferred revenue (2,770 ) 4,910  
    Change in non-cash working capital (1,863 ) (2,178 )
    Net cash provided by operating activities 29,917   36,077  

    Financing activities

           
    Repayment of acquired line of credit   (2,012 )
    Repayment of government loan (141 )  
    Proceeds from issuance of common shares 5,597   4,193  
    Repayment of lease liabilities (2,750 ) (2,355 )
    Dividends paid (16,376 ) (16,207 )
    Net cash used in financing activities (13,670 ) (16,381 )

    Investing activities

           
    Corporate acquisition, net of cash acquired (27,292 ) (22,814 )
    Repayment of acquisition holdback payable (9,247 )  
    Property and equipment additions, net of disposals (1,422 ) (650 )
    Net cash used in investing activities (37,961 ) (23,464 )

    Decrease in cash

    (21,714
    ) (3,768 )
    Effect of foreign exchange on cash 2,515   1  
    Cash, beginning of year 63,083   66,850  
    Cash, end of year 43,884   63,083  

    Supplementary cash flow information

           
    Interest received 2,605   3,096  
    Interest paid 1,891   1,908  
    Income taxes paid 11,370   7,201  

    CORPORATE PROFILE 

    CMG Group (TSX:CMG) is a global software and consulting company that combines science and technology with deep industry expertise to solve complex subsurface and surface challenges for the new energy industry around the world. The Company is headquartered in Calgary, AB, with offices in Houston, Oslo, Stavanger, Kaiserslautern, Oxford, Dubai, Bogota, Rio de Janeiro, Bengaluru, and Kuala Lumpur. For more information, please visit www.cmgl.ca.

    ANNUAL FILINGS AND RELATED ANNUAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION

    Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) and consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto for the year ended March 31, 2025, can be obtained from our website www.cmgl.ca. The documents will also be available under CMG Group’s SEDAR profile www.sedarplus.ca.

    Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

    This press release contains “forward-looking statements”. Forward-looking statements can be identified by words such as: “anticipate”, “intend”, “plan”, “goal”, “seek”, “believe”, “project”, “estimate”, “expect”, “strategy”, “future”, “likely”, “may”, “should”, “will”, and similar references to future periods. Examples of forward-looking statements include, among others, statements we make regarding the benefits of the acquired technology, the ongoing development thereof; and the ability of data analytics to improve efficiency, cut costs and reduce risks.

    Forward-looking statements are neither historical facts nor assurances of future performance. Instead, they are based only on our current beliefs, expectations, and assumptions regarding the future of our business, future plans and strategies, projections, anticipated events and trends, the economy and other future conditions. Because forward-looking statements relate to the future, they are subject to inherent uncertainties, risks and changes in circumstances that are difficult to predict and many of which are outside of our control. Our actual results and financial condition may differ materially from those indicated in the forward-looking statements. Therefore, you should not rely on any of these forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause our actual results and financial condition to differ materially from those indicated in the forward-looking statements are detailed in the companies’ public filings.

    Any forward-looking statement made by us in this press release is based only on information currently available to us and speaks only as of the date on which it is made. Except as required by applicable securities laws, we undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statement, whether written or oral, that may be made from time to time, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise.

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI: Fast Payout Online Casinos: JACKBIT Rated #1 New Instant Withdrawal & Fast Payout Casino!

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    LITTLE ROCK, Ark., May 22, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Casino gaming is always exciting, but the payouts are often troubling and hectic for gamers. Since the advent of online casinos, much has changed. Fast payout online casinos are now available on the market to help with lightning-fast transactions. If you are interested in an instant cash-out casino, JACKBIT online casino is your destination. The platform is popular as a real cash payout online casino. Do you find JACKBIT interesting? This article deals with all the major details of JACKBIT, the fast withdrawal online casino.

    JACKBIT – The Fast Payout Online Casino

    ✅ CLICK HERE TO CLAIM NO WAGERING 100 FREE SPINS!

    JACKBIT is an instant payout online casino that started its operation in 2023. It provided access to the latest innovations in the online casino realm. The games can be played in different versions, like software versions and live versions. Major cryptocurrencies are supported by the platform.

    The regular tournaments, VIP club benefits, and promotions make the site one of the best casinos. Users can bet on major sports events, horse race betting, and esports betting in the JACKBIT platform itself. The site provides multiple sports options, such as horse race betting and esports betting. The site provides special bonus rewards.

    JACKBIT Online Casino: Joining Steps

    If you are interested in engaging with one of the same-day payout casinos, like JACKBIT.Then you should register your account first. These registration steps are easy to complete. Just follow the steps below:

    Step 1: Go to the JACKBIT Casino website and click on Register. Ensure that you are on the right platform before proceeding with the registration.

    Step 2: A Registration form will pop up. Now fill the form accurately. Create a username and password. You can insert a promo code if you have one to get additional benefits.

    Step 3: Accept the terms and conditions by clicking the tick box.

    Step 4: Now, click Register to complete your registration process.

    Note: It is advised to ensure that the details are correct. You have to double-check the current step before proceeding to the next.

    Bonuses & Promotions in JACKBIT Online Casino

    JACKBIT, the fast payout casino, offers multiple sports and promotional offers to both new and existing users. Along with the tag as a fast payout online casino, JACKBIT is also popular for its inclusive bonuses and promotions. Here are some of the promotional details of the platform:

    Welcome Bonus: JACKBIT provides a welcome bonus offer of 30% Rakeback + 100 First Deposit FS + No KYC

    • Weekly $10,000 giveaways + 10,000 free spins.
    • VIP rakeback up to 30% based on loyalty tiers.
    • Pragmatic Drops & Wins with a €2,000,000 prize pool.
    • NBA Playoffs Cashback and social media bonuses.
    • Regular slot and table game tournaments.

    ✅JOIN JACKBIT TODAY AND GRAB THE BONUSES OF 30% RAKEBACK + 100 FS!

    JACKBIT Online Casino: Advantages and Disadvantages
    Although JACKBIT is a popular fast payout and instant withdrawal casino, there are multiple factors to consider before joining. No online casino can engage with pure pros only. There are certain restrictions and limitations for each platform. Here are the pros and cons of the JACKBIT fast payout online casino.

    Pros

    • More than 6300 games available.
    • New players get welcome bonus rewards.
    • 24/7 live Customer Support
    • Sports betting on major sports events.
    • Same-day withdrawal online option for users.

    Cons

    • No dedicated mobile application.
    • Anonymous gaming is not available.

    Payment Features in JACKBIT – The Fast Payout Casino

    JACKBIT Casino supports both fiat and cryptocurrencies for transactions like Visa/MasterCard, E-Wallets, Bank Transfer, Bitcoin, Ethereum, Tether, Binance Coin, and Solana. The platform also has a cryptocurrency exchange. It allows users to buy cryptocurrencies for fiat currencies.

    The maximum and minimum deposit limit depends on the selected payment option. Since it is an easy cash-out online casino, it does not charge for deposits or withdrawals. However, the transaction charges may apply to payments. The weekly withdrawal limit is $25,000 or equivalent in other currencies. The maximum withdrawal limit is $50,000 per month.

    Deposit & Withdrawal Options At JACKBIT – The Fast Payout Casino

    As a real cash online casino, both cryptocurrencies and fiat payments are supported by JACKBIT. Multiple cryptocurrencies, such as Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash, Tron, Solana, Ethereum, Ripple, Monero, etc, can be deposited.

    For users interested in fiat payments, fiat currencies such as the Euro(EUR), US Dollar (USD), Pound Sterling (GBP), Canadian Dollar (CAD), or TRY can be used. Turkish Lira (TRY). These deposits may not incur additional cost, but there may be some delay.

    The instant withdrawal casino ensures that users can withdraw their rewards without any further delay. Go to the banking section of this same-day payout casino, and find the withdrawal section.

    Withdrawal of rewards is facilitated through cryptocurrency. It provides multiple options for its users. The withdrawal limit depends on the selected option. This flexibility allows seamless transactions for all players, irrespective of their preferred currency or withdrawal amount.

    Tips For Fast Withdrawals in JACKBIT

    JACKBIT is one of the best fast payout online casinos available in the market. The trusted reputation of the platform facilitates special you to win real money online instantly. The withdrawal convenience of JACKBIT has attracted players around the globe.

    • KYC verification: Complete your KYC verification requirement by providing a valid ID proof.
    • Payout Method: Make sure to select a faster payout method so that there is the least transaction delay to receive your rewards.
    • Customer support services: If you have any queries, make sure to engage with official customer service rather than any other platform.
    • Understand Terms and Conditions: Always verify T&C, especially the details related to bonus rewards. These rewards may affect your withdrawal.

    >>CLICK HERE TO PLAY & EXPERIENCE FAST PAYOUTS AT JACKBIT TODAY!<<

    Gaming Selection in JACKBIT

    JACKBIT, the fast payout casino, provides an impressive collection of more than 6000 titles. These games are developed by major software providers such as Habanero, Pragmatic Play, and Microgaming. These games provide an unparalleled gaming experience for users. The major games included in the casino are:

    Crypto slots offer both versatility and entertainment for their players. JACKBIT Casino has more than 5000 slot games on its platform. The diverse selection of games on the platform includes Classic slots, Bonus Buy Games, and Megaways etc.

    Popular slots include Sweet Bonanza, Gates of Olympus, Candy Rush, Jammin Jars, and Fruit Party etc. If you prefer games from particular developers, then you can easily choose from the list of providers and jump straight into action. But free play options are not available on these slot games.

    • Live Casino Games

    The JACKBIT fast payout casino has a dedicated live games section. It offers an impressive collection of 200 live games. Live versions of classics such as blackjack, roulette, and baccarat, along with other options such as Monopoly Live and Sweet Bonanza CandyLand, are available for players.

    The quality of these games is ensured by the renowned software providers such as Pragmatic Play. Ezugi and Evolution Gaming, etc. It is important to note that crypto live dealer games are unavailable in the demo version.

    • Table Games

    JACKBIT provides a collection of table games that caters to the different tastes and preferences of players. Players can enjoy multiple versions of classic games such as crypto blackjack, crypto poker, crypto roulette, and more.

    JACKBIT casino has an intriguing casino games collection that features options like European Roulette, Fair Roulette Pro, and many others. Players can explore other engaging table game collections, such as Dragon Tiger, Pontoon, and Thimbles, etc.

    JACKBIT casino provides two major versions of this game, such as Oasis Poker Classic and Pai Gow. The video poker section presents a collection of more than 70 games. Major variations include Joker Poker 100 Hands, Jacks or Better, and Oasis Poker etc. For gambling enthusiasts interested in the thrill of live action, there are four versions of the game hosted by professional dealers.

    • Crash Games

    JACKBIT provides limited crash game options to users. Aviator, developed by Spribe one such option that stands out as one of the most popular crash games available online. It is a prominent crash game featured in a separate section on the site exclusively for real money play. Other games include Dragon Crash, Crash Birds, etc.

    • Dice Games

    Dice Games are distributed across multiple sections of the site that offer enough opportunities to enjoy their favorite games. Players interested in Dice games can find them among casino games, mini-games within the live casino section.

    ✅PLAY WITH JACKBIT TO ACCESS THOUSANDS OF TOP CASINO GAMES!

    VIP and Loyalty Bonus:

    JACKBIT Casino has a VIP program. First, users need to collect points to level up. High VIP account levels allow users to accumulate points faster and get more perks in less time. VIP players avail themselves of the instant rakeback without any wagering requirements. Partnership with Pragmatic Play provides drop-and-win promotional offers.

    These promotions are distributed across the network and offer cash prizes or additional rewards. With such high-value features, JACKBIT continues to stand out as one of the best payout casinos available today.

    As one of the best online casino platforms, JACKBIT also hosts regular slot tournaments to keep players engaged and rewarded. A slot tournament provides a generous prize pool of $10,000 and 10,000 free spins. This tournament offers an exciting prospect for players. After depositing the amount, players can automatically enter the tournament with the combined benefits of real-time stat tracking provided at their fingertips.

    • Free Bets:

    JACKBIT Casino provides free bets as part of its promotions. After placing three bets of at least $10 each, users will be rewarded with a fourth bet.

    • Other Bonus Rewards:

    JACKBIT provides additional offers, such as the Social Media Bonus. Players can access multiple bonuses by following the brand on social media platforms. These bonuses usually consist of free spins, reload bonuses, and game-specific rewards. Such ongoing promotions, combined with rapid withdrawals, also place JACKBIT among the leading fast payout online casinos.

    Sports Betting Features in JACKBIT
    JACKBIT Casino has a robust sportsbook for sports enthusiasts with a wide range of bonuses and betting options. This section consists of traditional sports, eSports, and virtual sports. Let’s explore the features:

    • Bet Builder

    JACKBIT provides a sophisticated Bet Builder feature for its users. This feature combines multiple betting markets from JACKBIT casino into a single slip for enhanced flexibility and customization. Beginners may find this option complex, but seasoned bettors appreciate its versatility and strategic advantages.

    • Cashout Feature

    The Cashout feature allows you to settle bets before the end of an event, enhancing the overall betting experience. This feature can be availed across traditional sports, esports, and virtual sports events.

    Note: The Cashout feature can be accessed when the position in the ticket is active and unavailable while utilizing the replace function.

    • Betting Odds

    JACKBIT casino allows users to switch between decimal, American, and fractional odds types within seconds. This feature is provided in the settings options on the top right of the sportsbook.

    • Betting Limits

    JACKBIT has excellent betting limits. There is no explicit limit imposed on bettors that allows them to place wagers of any amount as they wish. The policy is applicable for both minimum and maximum bets, providing the bettors unrestricted flexibility in their betting. JACKBIT Casino allows bettors to pursue their betting strategies without any restrictions to enhance their the users’ overall betting experience.

    • Live Betting and Streaming

    Live Betting Options can be accessed through a dedicated subsection conveniently located on the left side of the platform. This feature supports players to make informed decisions according to the real-time data before placing bets.

    The streaming capabilities of the JACKBIT platform enhance the live betting experience. This streaming feature provides an extra layer of excitement and engagement to the live betting experience that allows players to follow the actions as they make their betting strategies.

    Interface and User Experience in the JACKBIT Online Casino

    JACKBITs provides a modern and intuitive user interface that makes it effortless to find their desired games or features. The site has interesting animations that enhance the overall outlook. The instant payout casino is the popular choice for gamers looking for easy withdrawal options.

    Users can easily enjoy gaming on their smartphones as the site is mobile-compatible. The site can be accessed using the web browser of the user’s mobile device. However, there is no dedicated application for mobile users to access the casino website.

    • Licensing and Security Measures

    JACKBIT is a casino licensed under the Curacao eGaming Commission, operating since 2022. It managed to gain an above-average reputation among the players. The casino is praised by many gamblers for its excellent game selection, user-friendly interface, outstanding customer support, and emphasis on cryptocurrency transactions. JACKBIT utilizes SSL encryption for security to ensure that players’ data is protected.

    • Responsible Gaming Measures in JACKBIT

    JACKBIT Casino provides a comprehensive and helpful page dedicated to responsible gambling measures. This page contains all the relevant details related to tools designed to limit access to the gambling site for underage individuals, ensuring a safe environment for all users.

    JACKBIT also provides tools such as a time-out period, account limits, and self-exclusion options to help players manage their gambling. Further assistance is provided by the platform’s dedicated support team.

    The page includes details about platforms and resources aimed at assisting individuals facing gambling-related issues. Gambling addiction can be problematic for some users, and maintaining safe, responsible practices helps protect users from gambling-related harm.

    While JACKBIT emphasizes responsible gambling, it also ranks among the top fast payout online casinos, offering instant withdrawals once your gaming session ends. This ensures users not only play safely but also enjoy timely access to their winnings.

    ✅TRY JACKBIT NOW FOR QUICK WINS AND FAST PAYOUTS!

    Final Verdict: Is JACKBIT Fast Payout Casino Worth Your Time?

    JACKBIT is a Fast payout online casino with plenty of games, interesting bonus offers, and robust security measures. Both new and loyal players get rewards. Cryptocurrency and fiat currencies are supported by the casino. It is an instant payout casino that provides value, speed, security, and convenience for users. JACKBIT provides lightning-fast transactions, bonus offers, and access to many high-quality games.

    Irrespective of whether you are playing on a mobile or desktop device, JACKBIT makes every victory even more rewarding. As the speed of online casinos increases, the withdrawal process can be completed in hours. It is the expected rate for online casino fans to complete transactions. Users can select JACKBIT to access their rewards fast, with multiple payment options for both deposit and withdrawal. Best customer support and minimum time delay required to track withdrawal amounts.

    Frequently Asked Questions About The Fast Payout Online Casinos

    • Does JACKBIT support cryptocurrencies?

    JACKBIT provides support for a broad set of cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin(BTC), Ethereum( ETH), Binance Coin(BNB), and Tron(TRX), etc. It also supports stablecoins that offer stability by getting pegged to fiat currencies.

    • Does JACKBIT Casino have a mobile application?

    No, JACKBIT casino does not provide any mobile application at present. But the official website is compatible with mobile devices. So users can access most of the features available on the full version from their mobile device. It is a reliable approach to prefer over the dedicated mobile apps.

    • What games are offered by JACKBIT Casino?

    JACKBIT Casino provides an impressive collection of games that caters to multiple player preferences. There are more than 6000 slots from major developers such as Yggdrasil, Play’n GO, Microgaming, Habanero, Wazdan, and Pragmatic Play. More than slots, the casino provides multiple versions of table games roulette, blackjack, and poker. JACKBIT also provides live dealer games, mini games, Keno, instant games, and lotteries.

    • Is sports betting available at JACKBIT Casino?

    Yes, Users can bet on a wide variety of sports, such as Football, horse racing, and tennis, as well as esports such as Dota 2, League of Legends, and Counter-Strike. A virtual sports betting option is also available on the platform.

    • What are the customer support services provided by JACKBIT?

    JACKBIT Casino provides live chat and email options. The official JACKBIT website provides a live chat option.. Users can write and send emails to support@JACKBIT.com for further assistance.

    • Is withdrawal easy in JACKBIT?

    JACKBIT is one of the most famous fast payout online casinos. It is the fastest paying online casino, so you can be at ease about the withdrawal option and convenience.

    Email: support@JACKBIT.com

    Disclaimer & Affiliate Disclosure

    The information in this article is for informational and promotional purposes only and is not legal, financial, or professional advice. While we strive for accuracy, no warranties are made regarding completeness or timeliness. Readers should verify information independently. The publisher, affiliates, and contributors are not liable for errors, omissions, or losses from using this content.

    This article may contain affiliate links. Clicking these links and making a deposit may earn us a commission at no extra cost to you. These relationships do not affect our editorial integrity, and all evaluations are based on independent research.

    Online gambling is for those of legal age (19+ in Australia). Gambling carries financial risks and may lead to addiction. Play responsibly and seek help if needed. All trademarks are the property of their respective owners. This content is not endorsed by any brands unless stated.

    Photos accompanying this announcement are available at:

    https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/5101492a-6a4b-4ad0-a722-bf44a6671d50

    https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/93408be8-279f-45dc-89ad-71f219dfea4b

    https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/7b5378a0-755d-46e9-ad5e-0480b43f8a83

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI USA: Former Defense Contractor Pleads Guilty to Tax Crimes

    Source: US State of California

    Defendant Admits Concealing 50% Ownership of $7B Defense Contracting Business to Evade Taxes

    A former defense contractor pleaded guilty today to tax crimes related to his scheme to defraud the United States and evade taxes on income that he earned from his contracts with the U.S. Department of Defense.

    The following is according to court documents and statements made in court: Douglas Edelman founded and owned 50% of Mina Corp. and Red Star Enterprises (Mina/Red Star), a defense contracting business that received more than $7 billion from contracts with the U.S. Department of Defense to provide jet fuel in the United States’ post-9/11 military efforts in Afghanistan and the Middle East.

    Working with others, Edelman engaged in a lengthy scheme to hide his Mina/Red Star profits to evade U.S. taxes, including by concealing his income in undisclosed foreign bank accounts, creating false documents and making false statements that one of his co-conspirators — a French citizen residing abroad and without U.S. tax obligations — founded and owned Mina/Red Star.

    For example, when the company became profitable in 2005, Edelman began taking distributions which he deposited into Swiss bank accounts, primarily at Credit Suisse, in the name of other companies he owned. In 2008, Credit Suisse informed Edelman that he had to either close his accounts or disclose them to U.S. authorities. Rather than come into compliance with his tax and reporting obligations, Edelman closed his accounts and opened new ones at Bank Julius Baer in Singapore in the name of a nominee entity, the beneficiaries of which were purportedly Edelman’s daughters. He then directed the subject income he earned from Mina/Red Star to those bank accounts.

    In 2010 the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Oversight and Government Reform’s Subcommittee on National Security and Foreign Affairs began investigating allegations of corruption in connection with Mina/Red Star’s contracts with the Department of Defense. As part of this inquiry, the subcommittee became interested in the identity of Mina/Red Star’s owners. At this time, Edelman had not filed U.S. tax returns to report the millions of dollars he had earned from Mina/Red Star and had not paid U.S. taxes on his income.

    Rather than disclose his ownership, Edelman caused his attorneys to tell Congress a false story that a French co-conspirator who had no U.S. tax or reporting obligations founded and co-owed Mina/Red Star with another individual. To corroborate the false story, Edelman and a co-conspirator caused false and backdated paperwork to be created.

    To continue the scheme, Edelman conveyed the false story about Mina/Red Star’s ownership to other arms of the U.S. government, including to the Department of Defense during contract negotiations in 2010 and 2011, to the IRS in a 2016 application to the Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program, and to the Justice Department in a 2018 presentation.

    In conjunction with his 2016 application to the IRS’s Voluntary Disclosure Program, Edelman filed false tax returns for several prior years that only reported income from gifts or purported consulting payments, continuing to conceal the millions he had earned from his company. On the returns, he  also concealed profits he had earned from a separate business to provide internet service to members of the armed forces at Kandahar Air Base in Afghanistan.

    Instead of paying the taxes that he knew he owed, Edelman used the money to fund his lifestyle and additional investments. He invested in a music television franchise in Eastern Europe, a land venture in Tulum, Mexico, and a farm in Kenya, and purchased property around Europe, including a home in Ibiza, Spain, and a townhouse in London.

    Edelman faces a maximum penalty of five years in prison for each count to which he has pleaded. He also faces a period of supervised release, restitution, and monetary penalties. A federal district court judge will determine any sentence after considering the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and other statutory factors.

    Acting Deputy Assistant Attorney General Karen E. Kelly of the Justice Department’s Tax Division, U.S. Attorney Jeanine Ferris Pirro for the District of Columbia, and Executive Special Agent in Charge Kareem Carter of the Criminal Investigation (IRS-CI) Washington, D.C., Field Office made the announcement.

    Special agents from IRS-CI’s International Tax & Financial Crimes specialty group, a team based out of Washington, D.C., that is dedicated to uncovering international tax crimes, along with the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction are investigating the case. The Justice Department’s Office of International Affairs assisted in the investigation. Also providing assistance were His Majesty’s Revenue & Customs of the United Kingdom; the Joint Chiefs of Global Tax Enforcement (J5), which brings together the taxing authorities of Australia, Canada, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and the United States; and authorities from Belize, Israel, and Cyprus.

    The Government of the Kingdom of Spain arrested and extradited Edelman to the United States. The Justice Department’s Office of International Affairs also provided substantial assistance in securing Edelman’s arrest and extradition.

    Assistant Chief Sarah Ranney and Trial Attorney Ezra Spiro of the Tax Division and Assistant U.S. Attorney Joshua Gold for the District of Columbia are prosecuting the case. 

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI: RUBIS: Evolutions at the Supervisory Board and its Committees – Communication following the requests received for the inclusion of resolutions to the agenda of the Shareholders’ Meeting of 12 June 2025

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Paris, 22 May 2025, 7:45am

    1.  The Supervisory Board announces the cooptation of Antoine Sautenet and reorganises its specialised Committees following Nils Christian Bergene’s departure

    Following Nils Christian Bergene’s departure on 15 May 2025, the Supervisory Board decided at its meeting on 21 May 2025, upon the Compensation, Appointments and Governance Committee’s recommendation, to coopt Antoine Sautenet, Head of Sustainable Development at Michelin, as independent member of the Supervisory Board.

    Antoine Sautenet joins the Board, effective 21 May 2025 and subject to ratification by the upcoming Shareholders’ Meeting, for the remainder of Nils Christian Bergene’s term of office, i.e., until the end of the Shareholders’ Meeting to be held in 2027 to approve the financial statements for the 2026 fiscal year. Antoine Sautenet’s profile was identified during the appointment process to enrich the work of the Board. He will bring his expertise to the Board, particularly in the areas of corporate social and environmental responsibility (CSR) and climate issues.

    Upon the Supervisory Board’s recommendation, the Managing Partners have included a new resolution to the agenda of the next annual Shareholders’ Meeting scheduled for 12 June 2025 and invites shareholders to ratify this co-optation in accordance with applicable regulations.

    The composition of the Board Committees has also been adjusted to reflect the new composition of the Board, in line with the Board succession plan. Alberto Pedrosa (independent member) has been appointed, with immediate effect, Chairman of the Audit and CSR Committee, which Marc-Olivier Laurent (independent member) joins as ex officio member in his capacity as the new Chairman of the Board. Benoît Luc (independent member) joins the Compensation, Appointments and Governance Committee, replacing Nils Christian Bergene. The Audit and CSR Committee and the Compensation, Appointments and Governance Committee comprise 100% independent members.

    2.  The Supervisory Board issued a positive opinion on the two proposed resolutions submitted by Compagnie Nationale de Navigation (CNN), which the Managing Partners have consequently approved, upon the Supervisory Board’s recommendation

    As indicated in its press release dated 16 May 2025, Rubis received on 15 May 2025, from Compagnie Nationale de Navigation (CNN), a request to add two resolutions to the agenda. These resolutions pertain to the appointment of Patrick Molis and Anne Lauvergeon as members of the Supervisory Board, for a term of three years.

    The Supervisory Board, which met on 21 May 2025, expresses a favourable opinion regarding the appointment of these two candidates. The Board believes that the proposals to appoint Patrick Molis and Anne Lauvergeon, as independent members, do not alter the overall composition of the Supervisory Board and were submitted following discussions between the Company and CNN, a shareholder with a 9.3% stake, demonstrating CNN’s willingness to engage in a constructive dialogue, to which the Supervisory Board, representing shareholders, is sensitive.

    It was also noted that CNN, which has engaged in a constructive manner and has a significant stake in the Company’s share capital, supports all the resolutions proposed by the Managing Partners and endorsed by the Supervisory Board.

    Patrick Molis also expressed his desire to contribute to the ongoing improvement of the functioning of the Supervisory Board following the strengthening of its duties formalised in October 2024 and, in this regard, proposed the appointment of a new independent member, Anne Lauvergeon.

    Finally, committed to complying with the corporate governance rules applicable to the Group, the Supervisory Board emphasised that the members of the Compensation, Appointments and Governance Committee had the opportunity to interview both candidates.

    The Managing Partners added these two draft resolutions to the agenda of the Shareholders’ Meeting of 12 June 2025 and decided to approve these two nominations, following the favourable opinion of the Supervisory Board, on its own composition, which it has always followed. Shareholders are therefore also invited to approve the two draft resolutions submitted to the vote of the Shareholders’ Meeting of 12 June 2025, at the initiative of CNN.

    Consequently, if the resolutions proposed or approved by the Supervisory Board are adopted, the Supervisory Board will be composed, following the Shareholders’ Meeting of 12 June 2025, of 14 members, including 13 independent members (i.e., 93%) and six women (i.e., 43%).

    3.  Request for amendment to the by-laws relating to the methods used to calculate the dividend of the General Partners

    At its meeting on 20 May 2025, the Managing Partners reviewed a request to include a draft resolution submitted by a shareholder1 representing approximately 2.78% of Rubis’ share capital, dated 17 May 2025 and brought to Rubis’ attention on 19 May 2025, aimed at amending Article 56 of Rubis’ by-laws relating to the methods used to calculate the dividend of the General Partners, so as to provide that the Total Shareholder Return (TSR) would now be calculated on the basis of the highest of the average of the opening prices of the last 20 trading days of all the fiscal years preceding the Relevant Fiscal Year, without any time limit.

    Rubis reiterates its strong commitment to ensuring the best possible alignment between the interests of all shareholders and those of the General Partners, and notes that the current Total Shareholder Return formula, calculated by reference to the three financial years preceding the financial year in which a possible dividend payment to General Partners is determined, is the result of an evolution proposed in line with expressed expectations. It was approved with very wide support by shareholders, representing 99.8% of the votes cast at the Extraordinary Shareholders’ Meeting of 9 December 2020.

    This method currently in force ensures a certain stability in the assessment of Rubis’ performance and is consistent with the structural shift in the valuation of European companies operating in the fossil fuel sector. It is moreover recalled that this method did not result in any dividend distributions to General Partners for fiscal years 2020, 2021, 2022 and 2023.

    Considering the complexity and sensitivity of each of the parameters on which the formula is based, any new evolution to the General Partners dividend mechanism requires in-depth simulations and analysis to measure its direct and indirect effects, with a view to proposing a formula that protects the interests of shareholders and all other Rubis stakeholders.

    Acknowledging in particular the absence of approval by the General Partners for this proposed amendment to the by-laws, which therefore could not be implemented in accordance with the provisions of the French Commercial Code, the Managing Partners had no option but to conclude that the proposed resolution should not be included on the agenda of the Shareholders’ Meeting scheduled to be held on 12 June 2025.

    However, following discussions with this shareholder as part of its shareholder engagement, to which it pays close attention, Rubis will conduct an in-depth analysis of a possible evolution to the methods for calculating the dividend of the General Partners, which could be submitted, as appropriate, upon completion of this analysis and under an appropriate corporate governance framework, at the annual Shareholders’ Meeting to be held in 2026.

    The resolution proposals submitted by CNN, along with their statements of reasons and the opinions of the Supervisory Board and the Managing Partners, are covered in an Addendum that complements the main Notice of Meeting for the Shareholders’ Meeting. This Addendum is available on Rubis’ website: https://www.rubis.fr/en/investors/shareholders-meetings/.

    BIOGRAPHY OF ANTOINE SAUTENET

    With a PhD in international law and a master’s degree in economics from the École normale supérieure in Rennes, Antoine Sautenet is currently Michelin Group’s Director of Sustainable Development. He is responsible for orchestrating the social and environmental aspects of the Group’s CSR performance.

    Within the Michelin Group, Antoine Sautenet previously held various positions in charge of public affairs and international trade in North America (Michelin representative in Canada) (2019 to 2022), Asia (Thailand) (2016 to 2019) and Europe (Paris) (2013 to 2016). He was also a project officer at the French Ministry of Foreign Affairs and a research associate at the Asia Centre of the French Institute for International Relations (IFRI).

    BIOGRAPHY OF PATRICK MOLIS

    Patrick Molis is the Chairman of CNN, a successor to Navale Worms, a historical branch of the Worms Group founded in the 19th century and specialising in shipping and logistics, particularly oil.

    CNN was acquired in 1999 by Patrick Molis, and has developed in land-based oil logistics (Compagnie Industrielle Maritime, TRAPIL), specialised shipping on ro-ro vessels for the benefit of Arianespace, Airbus, the French Armed Forces, air transport with Héli-Union, a company operating helicopters for transport to oil and gas platforms and maintenance in operational conditions of helicopters for the benefit of the French Armies.

    The historical operations have been gradually sold and CNN has focused on acquiring stakes in the industrial, maritime, logistics, energy, aeronautics and defense sectors.

    Patrick Molis, through CNN, also participated in the refinancing and takeover of the Arc Group, the world’s leading glassmaker, concluded in April 2025.

    He is an Officer of the French National Order of Merit and a Knight of the Légion d’honneur.

    BIOGRAPHY OF ANNE LAUVERGEON

    Anne Lauvergeon has led the French nuclear industry for a decade, as Chairwoman and Chief Executive Officer of Areva NC from June 1999 to July 2011, then Chairwoman of the Management Board (Directoire) of Areva from July 2001 to June 2011.

    From 1997 to 1999, she was a member of the Executive Committee of Alcatel, in charge of international and industrial investments; from 1995 to 1997, Managing Partner of Lazard Frères & Cie. In 1990, she was assigned as a special advisor for international economy and foreign trade at the French Presidency, then from 1991 to 1995, Deputy Secretary General and sherpa to the French President for the organisation of international summits (G7/G8).

    She was ranked twice by Time Magazine among the 100 most influential people in the world. She also has more than 30 years of experience on Boards of Directors and co-chairs the Medef State Simplification and Reform Commission.

    She is an Officer of the French National Order of Merit and an Officer of the Légion d’honneur.

    Media Relations Contact
    RUBIS – Communication RUBIS – Clémence Mignot-Dupeyrot, Head of IR
    Tel. : + 33 (0)1 44 17 95 95

    presse@rubis.fr

    Tel. : + 33 (0)1 45 01 87 44

    investors@rubis.fr


    1 The funds Tweedy, Browne International Value Fund, Tweedy, Browne Value Fund, Tweedy, Browne Worldwide High Dividend Yield Value Fund et Tweedy, Browne International Value Fund II – Currency Unhedged.

    Attachment

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI: Euronext launches an offering of bonds due 2032 convertible into new shares and/or exchangeable for existing shares (“OCEANEs”) for a nominal amount of €425 million

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Euronext launches an offering of bonds due 2032 convertible into new shares and/or exchangeable for existing shares (“OCEANEs”) for a nominal amount of €425 million

    Amsterdam, Brussels, Dublin, Lisbon, Milan, Oslo and Paris – 22 May 2025 – Euronext (ISIN Code: NL0006294274) (the “Company”), the leading European capital market infrastructure, announces today the launch of an offering of senior unsecured bonds due 2032 convertible into new shares and/or exchangeable for existing shares of the Company (“OCEANEs”) (the “Bonds”), by way of a placement to qualified investors only (within the meaning of Article 2(e) of the Prospectus Regulation (as defined below)), for a nominal amount of €425 million (the “Offering”).

    On 17 April 2025, the Company entered into a bridge loan facility with, among others, affiliates of the joint bookrunners appointed in the context of the Offering, to finance the acquisition of Admincontrol. The net proceeds from the Offering will be used by the Company for the repayment of a portion of such bridge financing and general corporate purposes.

    Main terms of the Bonds

    The Bonds will be issued with a denomination of €100,000 each (the “Principal Amount”), will be convertible and/or exchangeable into new and/or existing shares of Euronext (the “Shares”) and are expected to pay a fixed coupon at a rate between 1.5% and 2.0% per annum, payable semi-annually in arrear on 30 May and 30 November of each year (or on the following business day if this date is not a business day), and for the first time on 30 November 2025.

    The initial conversion price of the Bonds will be set between 30% and 35% above the Company’s reference share price on the regulated market of Euronext in Paris (“Euronext Paris”)1. The final terms and conditions of the Bonds are expected to be determined following the completion of the bookbuilding process later today, and settlement and delivery of the Bonds is expected to take place on 30 May 2025 (the “Issue Date”).

    Unless previously converted, exchanged, redeemed or purchased and cancelled, the Bonds will be redeemed at par on 30 May 2032 (or on the following business day if such date is not a business day) (the “Maturity Date”).

    The Bonds may be redeemed prior to the Maturity Date at the option of the Company, under certain conditions.

    In particular, the Bonds may be fully redeemed early at par plus any accrued interest at the Company’s option, subject to a prior notice of at least 30 (but not more than 60) calendar days, (i) at any time from 20 June 2030 (inclusive), if the arithmetic average, calculated over a period of 10 consecutive trading days chosen by the Company from among the 20 consecutive trading days preceding the day of the publication of the early redemption notice, of the daily products on each of such 10 consecutive trading days of the volume weighted average price of the Shares on Euronext Paris over the applicable conversion price on each such trading day, exceeds 130%; or (ii) at any time if 80% or more in principal amount of the Bonds issued (which shall, for the avoidance of doubt, include any tap issues of the Bonds) have been converted/exchanged and/or redeemed and/or purchased by the Company and cancelled.

    Bondholders will be granted the right to convert or exchange the Bonds into new and/or existing Shares (the “Conversion/Exchange Right”) which they may exercise at any time from the 41st day (inclusive) following the Issue Date up to the 7th business day (inclusive) preceding the Maturity Date or, as the case may be, the relevant early redemption date.

    The conversion ratio of the Bonds will be set at the Principal Amount divided by the prevailing initial conversion price, subject to standard adjustments, including anti-dilution and dividend protections, as described in the terms and conditions of the Bonds. Upon exercise of their Conversion/Exchange Right, holders of the Bonds will receive at the option of the Company new and/or existing Shares, carrying in all cases all rights attached to existing Shares as from the date of delivery.

    Application will be made for the admission of the Bonds to trading on Euronext AccessTM in Paris to occur within 30 calendar days from the Issue Date.

    Legal framework of the Offering and placement

    The Bonds will be issued by way of a placement to qualified investors only (within the meaning of Regulation (EU) 2017/1129 (as amended, the “Prospectus Regulation”)) (excluding the United States of America, Australia, Japan, Canada or South Africa), pursuant to the authorization granted by the Company’s annual general meeting held on 15 May 2025 (15th and 16th resolution), without an offer to the public (other than to qualified investors) in any country.

    Existing shareholders of the Company shall have no preferential subscription rights, and there will be no priority subscription period in connection with the issuance of the Bonds or any underlying new Shares to be issued upon conversion.

    Intentions of existing shareholders

    The Company is not aware of the intention of any of its main shareholders to participate in the Offering.

    Lock-up undertaking

    In the context of the Offering, the Company will agree to a lock-up undertaking with respect to its Shares and securities giving access to share capital of the Company for a period starting from the announcement of the final terms of the Bonds and ending 90 calendar days after the Issue Date, subject to certain customary exceptions or waiver from the joint global coordinators appointed in the context of the Offering.

    Dilution

    For illustrative purposes, considering a nominal amount of €425 million, a reference share price of €145.02 and a 32.5% conversion premium corresponding to the mid-point of the marketing range, the potential dilution would represent approximately 2.1% of the Company’s outstanding share capital, if the Conversion/Exchange Right was exercised for all the Bonds and the Company decided to deliver new Shares only upon exercise of the Conversion/Exchange Right.

    Available information
            
    Neither the offering of the Bonds, nor the admission of the Bonds to trading on Euronext AccessTM is subject to a prospectus approved by the Stichting Autoriteit Financiële Markten (AFM) in Netherlands or the Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF) in France. No key information document required by the PRIIPs Regulation or the UK PRIIPs Regulation (as defined below) has been or will be prepared. Detailed information about Company, including its business, results, prospects and the risk factors to which the Company is exposed are described in the Company’s universal registration document for the financial year ended 31 December 2024, filed with the AFM on 28 March 2025 and the Company’s first quarter 2025 results press release which includes the unaudited financial statements of the Company as at and for the three months ended 31 March 2025, which are all available on the Company’s website (https://www.euronext.com/en/investor-relations).

    Important information

    This press release does not constitute or form part of any offer or solicitation to purchase or subscribe for or to sell securities to any U.S. person or to any person in the United States, Australia, Japan, Canada or South Africa or in any jurisdiction to whom or in which such offer is unlawful, and the Offering of the Bonds is not an offer to the public in any jurisdiction (other than to qualified investors within the meaning of Article 2(e) of the Prospectus Regulation) or an offer to retail investors as such term is defined below.

    CONTACTS  

    ANALYSTS & INVESTORS ir@euronext.com

    Investor Relations        Aurélie Cohen                 

            Judith Stein        +33 6 15 23 91 97          

    MEDIA – mediateam@euronext.com 

    Europe        Aurélie Cohen         +33 1 70 48 24 45   

            Andrea Monzani         +39 02 72 42 62 13 

    Belgium        Marianne Aalders         +32 26 20 15 01                 

    France, Corporate        Flavio Bornancin-Tomasella        +33 1 70 48 24 45                 

    Ireland        Catalina Augspach        +33 6 82 09 99 70                

    Italy         Ester Russom         +39 02 72 42 67 56                 

    The Netherlands        Marianne Aalders         +31 20 721 41 33                 

    Norway         Cathrine Lorvik Segerlund        +47 41 69 59 10                 

    Portugal         Sandra Machado        +351 91 777 68 97                                 

    About Euronext  

    Euronext is the leading European capital market infrastructure, covering the entire capital markets value chain, from listing, trading, clearing, settlement and custody, to solutions for issuers and investors. Euronext runs MTS, one of Europe’s leading electronic fixed income trading markets, and Nord Pool, the European power market. Euronext also provides clearing and settlement services through Euronext Clearing and its Euronext Securities CSDs in Denmark, Italy, Norway and Portugal.

    As of March 2025, Euronext’s regulated exchanges in Belgium, France, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway and Portugal host nearly 1,800 listed issuers with €6.3 trillion in market capitalisation, a strong blue-chip franchise and the largest global centre for debt and fund listings. With a diverse domestic and international client base, Euronext handles 25% of European lit equity trading. Its products include equities, FX, ETFs, bonds, derivatives, commodities and indices.

    For the latest news, go to euronext.com or follow us on X and LinkedIn.

    Disclaimer

    This press release is for information purposes only: it is not a recommendation to engage in investment activities and is provided “as is”, without representation or warranty of any kind. While all reasonable care has been taken to ensure the accuracy of the content, Euronext does not guarantee its accuracy or completeness. Euronext will not be held liable for any loss or damages of any nature ensuing from using, trusting or acting on information provided. No information set out or referred to in this publication may be regarded as creating any right or obligation. The creation of rights and obligations in respect of financial products that are traded on the exchanges operated by Euronext’s subsidiaries shall depend solely on the applicable rules of the market operator. All proprietary rights and interest in or connected with this publication shall vest in Euronext. This press release speaks only as of this date. Euronext refers to Euronext N.V. and its affiliates. Information regarding trademarks and intellectual property rights of Euronext is available at www.euronext.com/terms-use.

    © 2025, Euronext N.V. – All rights reserved. 

    The Euronext Group processes your personal data in order to provide you with information about Euronext (the “Purpose”). With regard to the processing of this personal data, Euronext will comply with its obligations under Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and Council of 27 April 2016 (General Data Protection Regulation, “GDPR”), and any applicable national laws, rules and regulations implementing the GDPR, as provided in its privacy statement available at: www.euronext.com/privacy-policy. In accordance with the applicable legislation you have rights with regard to the processing of your personal data: for more information on your rights, please refer to: www.euronext.com/data_subjects_rights_request_information. To make a request regarding the processing of your data or to unsubscribe from this press release service, please use our data subject request form at connect2.euronext.com/form/data-subjects-rights-request or email our Data Protection Officer at dpo@euronext.com.

    Disclaimer

    The contents of this announcement have been prepared by and are the sole responsibility of the Company.

    The information contained in this announcement is for information purposes only and does not purport to be full or complete. No reliance may be placed by any person for any purpose on the information contained in this announcement or its accuracy, fairness or completeness.

    This announcement is not for publication or distribution, directly or indirectly, in or into the United States. The distribution of this announcement may be restricted by law in certain jurisdictions and persons into whose possession any document or other information referred to herein comes should inform themselves about and observe any such restriction. Any failure to comply with these restrictions may constitute a violation of the securities laws of any such jurisdiction.

    This announcement is an advertisement and not a prospectus within the meaning of Prospectus Regulation.

    This announcement does not contain or constitute an offer of, or the solicitation of an offer to buy, Bonds to any U.S. person or to any person in the United States, Australia, Canada, South Africa or Japan or in any jurisdiction to whom or in which such offer or solicitation is unlawful. The Bonds and the Shares, if any, to be issued upon exercise of the Conversion/Exercise Right (together, the “Securities”) referred to herein may not be offered or sold in the United States, or to, or for the account or benefit of, U.S. persons unless registered under the US Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) or offered in a transaction exempt from, or not subject to, the registration requirements of the Securities Act.

    In addition, until 40 days after the commencement of the Offering, an offer or sale of Bonds within the United States by a dealer (whether or not it is participating in the Offering) may violate the registration requirements of the Securities Act.

    The offer and sale of Securities referred to herein has not been and will not be registered under the Securities Act or under the applicable securities laws of Australia, Canada, South Africa or Japan. Subject to certain exceptions, the Bonds referred to herein may not be offered or sold in Australia, Canada, South Africa or Japan or to, or for the account or benefit of, any national, resident or citizen of Australia, Canada, South Africa or Japan. There will be no public offer of the Securities in the United States, Australia, Canada, South Africa or Japan or elsewhere.

    In member states of the European Economic Area (the “EEA”), this announcement and any offer is directed exclusively at persons who are “qualified investors” within the meaning of Article 2(e) of the Prospectus Regulation (“Qualified Investors”). In the United Kingdom this announcement and any offer is directed exclusively at persons who are “qualified investors” within the meaning of Article 2(e) of the Prospectus Regulation as it forms part of UK domestic law by virtue of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 (“EUWA”) (i) who have professional experience in matters relating to investments falling within Article 19(5) of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Financial Promotion) Order 2005, as amended (the “Order”), (ii) who fall within Article 49(2)(A) to (D) of the Order, or (iii) to whom it may otherwise lawfully be communicated (all such persons together with Qualified Investors in the EEA being referred to herein as “Relevant Persons”). This document is directed only at Relevant Persons and must not be acted on or relied on by persons who are not Relevant Persons. Any investment or investment activity to which this document relates is available only to Relevant Persons and will be engaged in only with Relevant Persons.

    This announcement may include statements that are, or may be deemed to be, “forward-looking statements”. These forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology, including the terms “believes”, “estimates”, “plans”, “projects”, “anticipates”, “expects”, “intends”, “may”, “will” or “should” or, in each case, their negative or other variations or comparable terminology, or by discussions of strategy, plans, objectives, goals, future events or intentions. Forward-looking statements may and often do differ materially from actual results. Any forward-looking statements reflect the Company’s current view with respect to future events and are subject to risks relating to future events and other risks, uncertainties and assumptions relating to the Company’s and its group’s business, results of operations, financial position, liquidity, prospects, growth or strategies. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made.

    Each of the Company, the joint bookrunners appointed in the context of the Offering and their respective affiliates expressly disclaims any obligation or undertaking to update, review or revise any forward-looking statement contained in this announcement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise.

    Each of the joint bookrunners appointed in the context of the Offering is acting exclusively for the Company and no-one else in connection with the Offering. They will not regard any other person as their respective client in relation to the Offering and will not be responsible to anyone other than the Company for providing the protections afforded to their respective clients, nor for providing advice in relation to the Offering, the contents of this announcement or any transaction, arrangement or other matter referred to herein.

    In connection with the Offering, the joint bookrunners appointed in the context of the Offering and any of their affiliates may take up a portion of the Bonds in the Offering as a principal position and in that capacity may retain, purchase, sell, offer to sell for their own accounts such Bonds and other securities of the Company or related investments in connection with the Offering or otherwise. Accordingly, references to the Bonds being issued, offered, subscribed, acquired, placed or otherwise dealt in should be read as including any issue or offer to, or subscription, acquisition, placing or dealing by, the joint bookrunners appointed in the context of the Offering and any of their affiliates acting in such capacity. In addition, the joint bookrunners appointed in the context of the Offering and any of their affiliates may enter into financing arrangements (including swaps, warrants or contracts for differences) with investors in connection with which the joint bookrunners appointed in the context of the Offering and any of their affiliates may from time to time acquire, hold or dispose of Bonds and/or Shares. The joint bookrunners appointed in the context of the Offering do not intend to disclose the extent of any such investment or transactions otherwise than in accordance with any legal or regulatory obligations to do so.

    None of the joint bookrunners appointed in the context of the Offering or any of their respective directors, officers, employees, advisers or agents accepts any responsibility or liability whatsoever for or makes any representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the truth, accuracy or completeness of the information in this announcement (or whether any information has been omitted from the announcement) or any other information relating to the Company, its subsidiaries or associated companies, whether written, oral or in a visual or electronic form, and howsoever transmitted or made available, or for any loss howsoever arising from any use of this announcement or its contents or otherwise arising in connection therewith.

    Information to Distributors: Solely for the purposes of the product governance requirements of Directive 2014/65/EU on markets in financial instruments, as amended and supplemented (“MiFID II”) and local implementing measures (together, the “Product Governance Requirements”), and disclaiming all and any liability, whether arising in tort, contract or otherwise, which any “manufacturer” (for the purposes of the Product Governance Requirements) may otherwise have with respect thereto, the Bonds have been subject to a product approval process, which has determined that: (i) the target market for the Bonds is eligible counterparties and professional clients only, each as defined in MiFID II; and (ii) all channels for distribution of the Bonds to eligible counterparties and professional clients are appropriate. Any person subsequently offering, selling or recommending the Bonds (a “distributor”) should take into consideration the manufacturers’ target market assessment; however, a distributor (for the purposes of the Product Governance Requirements) is responsible for undertaking its own target market assessment in respect of the Bonds (by either adopting or refining the manufacturers’ target market assessment) and determining appropriate distribution channels.

    The target market assessment is without prejudice to the requirements of any contractual or legal selling restrictions in relation to any offering of the Bonds.

    For the avoidance of doubt, the target market assessment does not constitute: (a) an assessment of suitability or appropriateness for the purposes of MiFID II; or (b) a recommendation to any investor or group of investors to invest in, or purchase, or take any other action whatsoever with respect to the Bonds.

    PRIIPs Regulation / Prospectus Regulation / Prohibition of sales to EEA and UK retail investors – The Bonds are not intended to be offered, sold or otherwise made available to and should not be offered, sold or otherwise made available to any retail investor in the EEA or the UK. For these purposes, a “retail investor” means (a) in the EEA, a person who is one (or more) of: (i) a retail client as defined in point (11) of Article 4(1) of MiFID II; or (ii) a customer within the meaning of Directive (EU) 2016/97 as amended or superseded (the “Insurance Distribution Directive”), where that customer would not qualify as a professional client as defined in point (10) of Article 4(1) of MiFID II; or (iii) not a Qualified Investor as defined in Article 2(e) of the Prospectus Regulation and (b) in the UK, a person who is one (or more) of (i) a retail client within the meaning of Regulation (EU) No. 2017/565 as it forms part of UK domestic law by virtue of the EUWA or (ii) a customer within the meaning of the provisions of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 of the UK (the “FSMA”) and any rules or regulations made under the FSMA to implement Directive (EU) 2016/97, where that customer would not qualify as a professional client, as defined in point (8) of Article 2(1) of Regulation (EU) No. 600/2014 as it forms part of UK domestic law by virtue of the EUWA or (iii) not a Qualified Investor as defined in Article 2(e) of the Prospectus Regulation as it forms part of UK domestic law by virtue of the EUWA. Consequently, no key information document required by Regulation (EU) No 1286/2014 (as amended, the “EU PRIIPs Regulation”) or the EU PRIIPS Regulation as it forms part of UK domestic law by virtue of the EUWA (the “UK PRIIPS Regulation”) for offering or selling the Bonds or otherwise making them available to retail investors in the EEA or UK has been prepared and therefore offering or selling the Bonds or otherwise making them available to any retail investor in the EEA or the UK may be unlawful under the EU PRIIPs Regulation and/or the UK PRIIPs Regulation.


    1 The reference share price will be equal to the volume-weighted average price (VWAP) of the Shares recorded on Euronext Paris from the launch of the Offering today until the determination of the final terms (pricing) of the Bonds on the same day.
    2 i.e. Euronext’s share price on Euronext Paris, at close of trading on 21 May 2025

    Attachment

    The MIL Network

  • Aid trucks enter Gaza after delays, as pressure mounts on Israel

    Source: Government of India

    Source: Government of India (4)

    Israel allowed 100 aid trucks carrying flour, baby food and medical equipment into the Gaza Strip on Wednesday, the Israeli military said, as UN officials reported that distribution issues had meant that no aid had so far reached people in need.

    Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Israel would be open to a temporary ceasefire to enable the return of hostages. But otherwise he said it would press ahead with a military campaign to gain total control of Gaza.

    After an 11-week blockade on supplies entering Gaza, the Israeli military said a total of 98 aid trucks entered on Monday and Tuesday. But even those minimal supplies have not made it to Gaza’s soup kitchens, bakeries, markets and hospitals, according to aid officials and local bakeries that were standing by to receive supplies of flour.

    “None of this aid – that is a very limited number of trucks – has reached the Gaza population,” said Antoine Renard, country director of the World Food Programme.

    The blockade has left Gazans in an increasingly desperate struggle for survival, despite growing international and domestic pressure on Israel’s government, which one opposition figure said risked turning the country into a “pariah state”.

    Thousands of tons of food and other vital supplies are waiting near crossing points into Gaza but until it can be safely distributed, around a quarter of the population remains at risk of famine, Renard said.

    “I’m here since eight in the morning, just to get one plate for six people while it is not enough for one person,” said Mahmoud al-Haw, who says he often waits for up to six hours a day hoping for some lentil soup to keep his children alive.

    U.N. officials said security issues had prevented the aid from moving out of the logistics hub at the Kerem Shalom crossing point but late on Wednesday there appeared some hope that supplies would move more freely.

    Nahid Shahaiber, a major transport company owner, said 75 trucks of flour and over a dozen more carrying nutritional supplements and sugar were inside the southern area of Rafah and witnesses said trucks carrying flour had been seen in Deir Al-Balah in the central Gaza Strip.

    Israel imposed a blockade on all supplies entering Gaza in March, saying Hamas was seizing supplies meant for civilians – a charge the group denies.

    Under mounting international pressure, it has allowed aid deliveries by the U.N. and other aid groups to resume briefly until a new U.S.-backed distribution model using private contractors operating through so-called secure hubs is up and running by the end of the month. But the United Nations says the plan is not impartial or neutral, and it will not be involved.

    ‘PARIAH STATE’

    As people waited for supplies to arrive, air strikes and tank fire killed at least 50 people across the Gaza Strip on Wednesday, Palestinian health authorities said. The Israeli military said air strikes hit 115 targets, which it said included rocket launchers, tunnels and unspecified military infrastructure.

    Efforts to halt the fighting have faltered, with both Hamas, which insists on a final end to the war and withdrawal of Israeli forces, and Israel, which says Hamas must disarm and leave Gaza, sticking to positions the other side rejects.

    Netanyahu said an Israeli air strike this month had probably killed Hamas leader Mohammed Sinwar and he reiterated his demand for the complete demilitarization of Gaza and the exile of Hamas leaders for the war to end.

    The resumption of the assault on Gaza since March, following a two-month ceasefire, has drawn condemnation from countries including Britain and Canada that have long been cautious about expressing open criticism of Israel. Even the United States, the country’s most important ally, has shown signs of losing patience with Netanyahu.

    Netanyahu said it was “a disgrace” that countries like Britain were sanctioning Israel instead of Hamas.

    There has been growing unease within Israel meanwhile at the continuation of the war while 58 hostages remain in Gaza.

    Left-wing opposition leader Yair Golan drew a furious response from the government and its supporters this week when he declared that “A sane country doesn’t kill babies as a hobby” and said Israel risked becoming a “pariah state among the nations.”

    Golan, a former deputy commander of the Israeli military who went single-handedly to rescue victims of the Hamas attack on Israel on Oct 7, 2023, leads the left-wing Democrats, a small party with little electoral clout.

    But his words, and similar comments by former Prime Minister Ehud Olmert in an interview with the BBC, underscored the rift within Israel. Netanyahu dismissed the criticism, saying he was “appalled” by Golan’s comments.

    Opinion polls show widespread support for a ceasefire that would include the return of all the hostages, with a survey from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem this week showing 70% in favour of a deal.

    But hardliners in the cabinet, some of whom argue for the complete expulsion of all Palestinians from Gaza, have insisted on continuing the war until “final victory”, which would include disarming Hamas as well as the return of the hostages.

    Netanyahu, trailing in the opinion polls and facing trial at home on corruption charges, which he denies, as well as an arrest warrant from the International Criminal Court, has so far sided with the hardliners.

    Israel launched its campaign in Gaza in response to the Hamas attack on October 7, 2023, which killed some 1,200 people by Israeli tallies and saw 251 hostages abducted into Gaza.

    The campaign has killed more than 53,600 Palestinians, according to Gaza health authorities, and devastated the coastal strip, where aid groups say signs of severe malnutrition are widespread.

    (Reuters)

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Canada’s Foreign Ministry summons Israeli ambassador over shooting at diplomatic delegation

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: People’s Republic of China in Russian – People’s Republic of China in Russian –

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    OTTAWA, May 22 (Xinhua) — Canadian Foreign Minister Anita Anand said on Wednesday she has demanded that the Israeli ambassador be summoned over the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) shooting at a diplomatic delegation visiting the West Bank.

    The head of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs confirmed that there were four Canadians among the delegation that was shot at by the Israeli military, and they were not injured.

    “I have asked my officials to call the Israeli ambassador to convey Canada’s grave concerns. We expect a full investigation and accountability,” she wrote.

    The IDF said the delegation deviated from its approved route and soldiers fired warning shots, resulting in no casualties.

    Earlier this week, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and French President Emmanuel Macron issued a joint statement threatening to take “concrete measures” against Israel in response to the renewed military offensive in the Gaza Strip. –0–

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI China: WADA welcomes additional funding from Qatar for scientific research

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    The World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) has welcomed Qatar’s decision to provide additional funding to support the organization’s scientific research efforts.

    The Ministry of Sports and Youth in Qatar will contribute an extra 1.5 million U.S. dollars, in addition to the country’s annual payment of more than 200,000 dollars to WADA, the agency announced on Wednesday.

    “WADA is appreciative of the continued support of our partners within Qatar’s Ministry of Sports and Youth. The additional funding will make a significant impact on anti-doping research globally and within Qatar itself,” said WADA President Witold Banka.

    “This is another indication of the strong support WADA receives from governments around the world, which believe in and trust us to deliver on our clean sport mission and understand the importance of cutting-edge scientific research to being ahead of those who seek to cheat the system.”

    Earlier this month, Japan pledged an additional 196,000 dollars to support anti-doping capacity and capability development in Asia and Oceania. According to WADA, Japan has contributed roughly 2.5 million dollars in additional funding over the past two decades.

    In the past 10 years, WADA has also received additional contributions from countries including Australia, Azerbaijan, Brazil, Canada, China, Denmark, Egypt, France, India, Kuwait, Poland, Saudi Arabia, Switzerland and the United States.

    Banka stated earlier this year that WADA invests heavily in anti-doping research, allocating about 10 percent of its annual budget to scientific and social science initiatives. The agency has also called on its partners to support ongoing research efforts, including recent work focused on unintentional doping.

    WADA has set a budget of more than 50 million dollars for 2025.

    The United States, which failed to pay its 2024 annual fee of 3.62 million dollars–amounting to 14 percent of WADA’s budget–automatically loses its seat on the organization’s executive committee for the year.

    “It is so important for athletes that WADA is properly resourced and that it has certainty around the funds it receives,” said Yuhan Tan, Belgium’s former badminton player and WADA Athlete Council representative on the Foundation Board.

    “I call on all governments to fulfill their commitments and make their annual contributions to WADA in a predictable and timely fashion so the work upholding the World Anti-Doping Code and supporting athletes around the world can continue. Clearly, anti-doping is becoming more and more politicized, which must be avoided as it puts all athletes and the entire system at risk,” he commented when WADA released its budget plan earlier this year. 

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI: DMG Blockchain Solutions Reports Second Quarter 2025 Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    VANCOUVER, British Columbia, May 21, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — DMG Blockchain Solutions Inc. (TSX-V: DMGI) (OTCQB: DMGGF) (FRANKFURT: 6AX) (“DMG” or the “Company”), a vertically integrated blockchain and data center technology company, today announces its fiscal second quarter 2025 financial results. All financial references are in Canadian Dollars unless specified otherwise. Readers are encouraged to review the Company’s March 31, 2025 quarterly unaudited financial statements and management’s discussion and analysis thereof for an assessment of the Company’s performance and applicable risk factors, available at www.sedarplus.ca.

    Q2 2025 Financial Results Highlights

    • Revenue: $12.6 million in Q2 2025, up 9% from $11.6 million in Q1 2025 and up 26% from $10.0 million in Q2 2024
    • Bitcoin Mined: 91 bitcoin mined in Q2 2025, down from 97 bitcoin in Q1 2025
    • Cash Flow from Operations: -$1.0 million in Q2 2025, as the Company mined $7.1 million more bitcoin than it sold
    • Hashrate: 1.76 EH/s average for Q2 2025, up 8% from Q1 2025 and up 82% from Q2 2024
    • Cash, Short-term Investments and Digital Assets: $61.9 million as of quarter-end Q2 2025, down 3% from Q1 2025 and up 42% from Q2 2024
    • Total Assets: $129.5 million as of quarter-end Q2 2025, down 6% from Q1 2025 and up 9% from Q2 2024
    • Net Income: -$0.02 per share in Q2 2025 versus -$0.02 in Q1 2025 and $0.00 per share in Q2 2024

    DMG’s CEO, Sheldon Bennett, commented: “In Q2, we continued to increase our Bitcoin mining hashrate, as we deployed our hydro direct-liquid-cooled miners. In addition, we advanced our AI strategy with the purchase of 2 megawatts of prefabbed data center infrastructure and have been making progress with respect to engaging Canadian public sector entities and private enterprises for off-take agreements, which we believe will be instrumental in aiding DMG in pursuing non-dilutive financing opportunities. Finally, the Systemic Trust, our digital asset custody platform, is currently focused on building on its platform development execution to gain customer adoption, ramp revenue and broaden its platform capabilities throughout calendar 2025.”

    Financial Second Quarter 2025 Financial Results Review

    Revenue increased by $1,011,749 to $12,644,574 for the three months ended March 31, 2025 compared to the prior quarter. During the three months ended March 31, 2025, the Company received in its wallets from mining activity 91.27 bitcoin and ended the period with a balance of 458.07 bitcoin.

    Operating and maintenance expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2025 were $7,625,097, up from $5,270,851 in the prior year period. This increase is primarily due to a $1,796,739 rise in utilities expenses, driven by expanded digital currency mining operations with additional operating miners and fluctuating energy prices. Furthermore, new hosting fees paid to third parties, totaling $682,756, also contributed to this increase.

    Research costs for the three months ended March 31, 2025 increased by $122,232 compared to the prior year period. Research in fiscal 2025 continues to focus on software and relates to work on Systemic Trust, Helm, Reactor and Blockseer Explorer.

    General and administrative costs for the three months ended March 31, 2025 were $1,936,402 in comparison to $1,846,398 in the prior year period. General and administrative costs consist mostly of wages, professional fees, consulting fees and financing costs. The overall increase of $90,004 is attributable mainly to financing costs related to the Company’s credit facility with Sygnum Bank.

    Depreciation for the three months ended March 31, 2025 was $4,314,108 compared to $3,805,988 in the prior year period.

    Net income decreased by $3,348,566 to a net loss of $3,346,351 for the three months ended March 31, 2025 from the prior year period.

    Total assets as of March 31, 2025 were $129,506,488, an increase of $25,637,507 from the end of the prior year end. The increase is mainly attributable to the Company’s purchase of $7,116.500 short-term investments and a net increase in digital currency of $19,695,408 due to the increased price of bitcoin.

    Second Quarter 2025 Results Conference Call Details

    The Company will host a conference call to review its results and provide a corporate update on May 22, 2025 at 4:30 PM ET. Participants should register for the call via the link.

    In addition to a live Q&A session via chat, management will also address pre-submitted questions. Those wishing to submit a question may do so via email at investors@dmgblockchain.com, using the subject line ‘Conference Call Question Submission,’ through 2:00 PM ET on May 22, 2025.

    About DMG Blockchain Solutions Inc.

    DMG is a publicly traded and vertically integrated blockchain and data center technology company that manages, operates and develops end-to-end digital solutions to monetize the digital asset and artificial intelligence compute ecosystems. Systemic Trust Company, a wholly owned subsidiary of DMG, is an integral component of DMG’s carbon-neutral Bitcoin ecosystem, which enables financial institutions to move bitcoin in a sustainable and regulatory-compliant manner.

    For more information on DMG Blockchain Solutions visit: www.dmgblockchain.com
    Follow @dmgblockchain on X and subscribe to DMG’s YouTube channel.

    For further information, please contact:

    On behalf of the Board of Directors,

    Sheldon Bennett, CEO & Director
    Tel: +1 (778) 300-5406
    Email: investors@dmgblockchain.com
    Web: www.dmgblockchain.com

    For Investor Relations:
    investors@dmgblockchain.com

    For Media Inquiries:
    Chantelle Borrelli
    Head of Communications
    chantelle@dmgblockchain.com

    DMG Blockchain Solutions Inc.
    Condensed Consolidated Interim Statements of Financial Position
    (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
     

    Notes

    As at
    March 31, 2025
    (unaudited)
      As at
    September 30,
    2024
    (audited)
     
    ASSETS   $   $  
    Current      
    Cash and cash equivalents   804,771   1,679,060  
    Amounts receivable 6 3,888,754   4,910,251  
    Digital currency 5 54,023,111   34,327,703  
    Prepaid expense and other current assets   494,184   337,042  
    Marketable securities 8 231,944   316,803  
    Short-term investment 9 7,116,500    
    Assets held for sale   30,408    
    Total current assets   66,589,672   41,570,859  
           
    Long-term deposits 10 5,791,547   2,047,682  
    Property and equipment 11 50,066,817   53,798,978  
    Intangible asset   276,040    
    Long-term investments 12 45,000   45,000  
    Amount recoverable 7 6,737,412   6,406,462  
    Total assets   129,506,488   103,868,981  
           
    LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY      
    Current      
    Trade and other payables 13 5,024,344   5,183,107  
    Deferred revenue 19 113    
    Current portion of lease liability   99,641   43,483  
    Current portion of loans payable 14 20,421,551   13,928,462  
    Total current liabilities   25,545,649   19,155,052  
           
    Long-term lease liability   131,012   51,842  
    Total liabilities   25,676,661   19,206,894  
           
    Shareholders’ Equity      
    Share capital 15(a) 120,326,738   113,086,455  
    Reserves 15(b)(c) 55,773,443   45,853,100  
    Accumulated other comprehensive income   18,905,080   10,448,614  
    Accumulated deficit   (91,175,434 ) (84,726,082 )
    Total shareholders’ equity   103,829,827   84,662,087  
    Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity   129,506,488   103,868,981  
           

    The disclosed notes are integral to these condensed consolidated financial statements

     
    DMG Blockchain Solutions Inc.
    Condensed Consolidated Interim Statements of Income (Loss) and Comprehensive Income (Loss)
    (Expressed in Canadian Dollars, except for number of shares)
    (Unaudited)
        For the Three Months Ended For the Six Months Ended
      Notes March 31,
    2025
      March 31,
    2024
      March 31,
    2025
      March 31,
    2024
     
        $   $   $   $  
    Revenue 17 12,644,574   10,015,659   24,277,399   19,706,423  
               
    Expenses          
    Operating and maintenance costs 18(a) 7,625,097   5,270,851   14,304,940   10,418,502  
    General and administrative 18(b) 1,936,402   1,846,398   3,773,081   2,732,459  
    Stock-based compensation   737,114   398,010   1,415,642   766,502  
    Research and development   608,448   486,216   1,162,412   924,395  
    Provision (recovery) for doubtful accounts   (1,976 ) 42   (6,719 ) 3,806  
    Depreciation 11 4,314,108   3,805,988   8,663,578   8,147,770  
    Total expenses   15,219,193   11,807,503   29,312,934   22,993,434  
               
    Loss before other items   (2,574,619 ) (1,791,844 ) (5,035,535 ) (3,287,011 )
               
    Other income (expense)          
    Interest and other income 7 166,648   170,044   330,950   335,825  
    Provision of sales tax receivable   (668,685 ) (381,690 ) (976,424 ) (635,590 )
    Gain (loss) on disposition of assets   (1,618 ) 4,809   (1,619 ) 4,809  
    Foreign exchange loss   7,414   (28,341 ) (901,975 ) (122,926 )
    Unrealized gain on revaluation of digital currency 5   1,019,456   28,083   9,182,316  
    Realized gain (loss) on sale of digital currency   (147,601 ) 1,143,489   154,208   1,995,359  
    Gain (loss) on change in fair value of marketable securities   (127,890 ) (133,708 ) (84,859 ) 111,043  
    Gain (loss) on fair value of investments       37,819   (609,120 )
    Net income (loss)   (3,346,351 ) 2,215   (6,449,352 ) 6,974,705  
               
    Other comprehensive income          
    Items that may be reclassified subsequently to income or loss:          
    Unrealized revaluation gain (loss) on digital currency 5 (6,830,755 ) 15,472,215   8,488,687   15,472,215  
    Cumulative translation adjustment   (810 ) (11,278 ) (32,221 ) (1,196 )
    Comprehensive income (loss)   (10,177,916 ) 15,463,152   2,007,114   22,445,724  
               
               
    Basic and diluted income (loss) per share 15(d) (0.02 ) 0.00   (0.03 ) 0.04  
    Weighted average number of shares outstanding 15(d)        
    – basic   203,242,018   169,029,065   194,424,988   168,585,910  
    – diluted   203,242,018   172,516,428   194,424,988   173,248,160  
                       

    The disclosed notes are integral to these condensed consolidated interim financial statements          

     
    DMG Blockchain Solutions Inc.
    Condensed Consolidated Interim Statements of Cash Flows
    (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
    (Unaudited)   
      For the Six Months Ended
     
      March 31, 2025   March 31, 2024  
       $    $  
    OPERATING ACTIVITIES    
    Net income (loss) for the period (6,449,352 ) 6,974,705  
    Non-cash items:    
    Accretion 7,827   23,272  
    Depreciation 8,663,579   8,147,770  
    Share-based payments 1,415,642   766,502  
    Unrealized foreign exchange loss 911,046   40,351  
    Loss (gain) on disposition of assets 1,618   (4,809 )
    Loss (gain) on change in fair value of marketable securities 84,860   (111,043 )
    Loss (gain) on fair value of investment (37,819 ) 609,120  
    Provision for sales tax receivable 976,424   635,590  
    Bad debt (recovery) expense (6,719 ) 3,806  
    Digital currency related revenue (23,409,103 ) (18,355,313 )
    Unrealized gain on digital currency (28,083 ) (9,182,315 )
    Digital currency sold 12,389,905   20,173,781  
    Realized gain on sale of digital currency (154,208 ) (1,995,359 )
    Non-cash interest income (330,950 ) (329,914 )
    Accrued interest 748,459    
         
    Changes in non-cash operating working capital:    
    Prepaid expenses and other current assets 1,433,405   (144,388 )
    Amounts receivable 144,544   (212,015 )
    Deferred revenue 113   11,277  
    Trade and other payables (76,596 ) 1,144,920  
    Net cash provided by operating activities (3,715,408 ) 8,195,938  
         
    INVESTING ACTIVITIES    
    Purchase of property and equipment (4,772,107 ) (830,859 )
    Purchase of intangible assets (276,040 )  
    Deposits on mining equipment (7,324,024 ) (18,102,867 )
    Purchase of short-term investment (7,116,500 ) (609,120 )
    Refund of security deposits 1,792,907    
    Net cash used by investing activities (17,695,764 ) (19,542,846 )
         
    FINANCING ACTIVITIES    
    Proceeds from issuance of units 17,254,945    
    Share issuance costs (1,570,875 )  
    Proceeds from option exercises 60,913   438,024  
    Principal lease payments (37,596 ) (61,187 )
    Proceeds from secured loan 5,829,013   10,791,288  
    Repayment of loans payable (1,000,000 ) (1,668 )
    Net cash provided by financing activities 20,536,400   11,166,457  
         
    Impact of currency translation on cash 483   17  
    Change in cash (874,289 ) (180,434 )
    Cash, beginning 1,679,060   1,789,913  
    Cash, end 804,771   1,609,479  
             

    The disclosed notes are integral to these condensed consolidated interim financial statements

    Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Service Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this news release.

    Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Information

    This news release contains forward-looking information or statements based on current expectations. Forward-looking statements contained in this news release include statements regarding the planned conference call, DMG’s strategies and plans, increasing hashrate and the anticipated timelines, the expected arrival and operation of the hydro miners and containers, the development of Systemic Trust including generating revenues, the potential for a 2-megawatt prefabricated data center, improving fleet efficiency and continuing to execute on Core+ software initiatives and plans to monetize bitcoin transactions, the continued investment in Bitcoin network software infrastructure and applications, developing and executing on the Company’s products and services, increasing self-mining, efforts to improve the operation of its mining fleet, the launch of products and services, events, courses of action, and the potential of the Company’s technology and operations, among others, are all forward-looking information.

    Future changes in the Bitcoin network-wide mining difficulty or Bitcoin hashrate may materially affect the future performance of DMG’s production of bitcoin, and future operating results could also be materially affected by the price of bitcoin and an increase in hashrate and mining difficulty.

    Forward-looking statements consist of statements that are not purely historical, including any statements regarding beliefs, plans, expectations, or intentions regarding the future. Such information can generally be identified by the use of forwarding-looking wording such as “may”, “expect”, “estimate”, “anticipate”, “intend”, “believe” and “continue” or the negative thereof or similar variations. The reader is cautioned that assumptions used in the preparation of any forward-looking information may prove to be incorrect. Events or circumstances may cause actual results to differ materially from those predicted, as a result of numerous known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors, many of which are beyond the control of the Company, including but not limited to, market and other conditions, volatility in the trading price of the common shares of the Company, business, economic and capital market conditions; the ability to manage operating expenses, which may adversely affect the Company’s financial condition; the ability to remain competitive as other better financed competitors develop and release competitive products; regulatory uncertainties; access to equipment; market conditions and the demand and pricing for products; the demand and pricing of bitcoin; security threats, including a loss/theft of DMG’s bitcoin; DMG’s relationships with its customers, distributors and business partners; the inability to add more power to DMG’s facilities; DMG’s ability to successfully define, design and release new products in a timely manner that meet customers’ needs; the ability to attract, retain and motivate qualified personnel; competition in the industry; the impact of technology changes on the products and industry; failure to develop new and innovative products; the ability to successfully maintain and enforce our intellectual property rights and defend third-party claims of infringement of their intellectual property rights; the impact of intellectual property litigation that could materially and adversely affect the business; the ability to manage working capital; and the dependence on key personnel. DMG may not actually achieve its plans, projections, or expectations. Such statements and information are based on numerous assumptions regarding present and future business strategies and the environment in which the Company will operate in the future, including the demand for its products, the ability to successfully develop software, that there will be no regulation or law that will prevent the Company from operating its business, anticipated costs, the ability to secure sufficient capital to complete its business plans, the ability to achieve goals and the price of bitcoin. Given these risks, uncertainties, and assumptions, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. The securities of DMG are considered highly speculative due to the nature of DMG’s business. For further information concerning these and other risks and uncertainties, refer to the Company’s filings on www.sedarplus.ca. In addition, DMG’s past financial performance may not be a reliable indicator of future performance.

    Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in forward-looking statements include, failure to obtain regulatory approval, the continued availability of capital and financing, equipment failures, lack of supply of equipment, power and infrastructure, failure to obtain any permits required to operate the business, the impact of technology changes on the industry, the impact of viruses and diseases on the Company’s ability to operate, secure equipment, and hire personnel, competition, security threats including stolen bitcoin from DMG or its customers, consumer sentiment towards DMG’s products, services and blockchain technology generally, failure to develop new and innovative products, litigation, adverse weather or climate events, increase in operating costs (which includes energy costs), increase in equipment and labor costs, equipment failures, decrease in the price of Bitcoin, failure of counterparties to perform their contractual obligations, government regulations, loss of key employees and consultants, and general economic, market or business conditions. Forward-looking statements contained in this news release are expressly qualified by this cautionary statement. The reader is cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking information. The forward-looking statements contained in this news release are made as of the date of this news release. Except as required by law, the Company disclaims any intention and assumes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise. Additionally, the Company undertakes no obligation to comment on the expectations of or statements made by third parties in respect of the matters discussed above.

    The MIL Network