Category: DJF

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Assigning collection of self-employed and small professionals’ insurance debts to private collection companies – E-001761/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Non-Performing Loans (NPL) Directive[1] applies as of 30 December 2023. According to Article 2 of the directive, its scope is limited to creditor’s rights under a non-performing credit agreement, or of the non-performing credit agreement itself, issued by a credit institution established in the EU.

    From this perspective, the transfer of social insurance debt or due contributions are not in scope of this directive. This domain is therefore competence of national law, without prejudice to the application of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR)[2].

    The supervision and enforcement of the GDPR falls within the competence of the national supervisory authorities and courts, without prejudice to the competences of the Commission as guardian of the Treaties.

    • [1] Directive (EU) 2021/2167 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2021 on credit servicers and credit purchasers and amending Directives 2008/48/EC and 2014/17/EU, OJ L 438, 8.12.2021, p.1.
    • [2] Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (GDPR), OJ L 119, 4.5.2016, p. 1-88, and (EU) 2018/1725.
    Last updated: 19 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Urgent measures for sea rescue – E-000979/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    1. Regulation 656/2014[1] applies in the context of operational cooperation coordinated by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) and does not affect the division of competences between the EU and the Member States or the obligations of the national authorities under the relevant international conventions[2]. This also includes the responsibility for declaring and coordinating search and rescue (SAR) activities in cases such as the one in question. In line with international law, this competence belongs exclusively to the rescue coordination centre(s) that oversee the area in which the specific incident takes place.

    2. The Commission has no competence to influence the way SAR activities are declared or performed by the responsible national authorities. Nevertheless, saving lives at sea is a moral duty, as well as a legal obligation for Member States under international law, independently from the circumstances that lead people to find themselves in distress at sea. The Commission remains committed to supporting the Member States to operate in line with this principle. The Commission repeatedly calls on all actors involved in SAR to always prioritise saving lives at sea and to comply with the relevant legal framework.

    3. According to open sources, the persons stranded on the Miskar oil platform were rescued by Sea-Watch and subsequently safely disembarked in Lampedusa on 4 March 2025, upon instructions received by Sea-Watch from the Italian Coast Guard.

    • [1] Regulation (EU) No 656/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 establishing rules for the surveillance of the external sea borders in the context of operational cooperation coordinated by the European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union. OJ L 189, 27.6.2014, p. 93-107.
    • [2] Such as the International Convention on the Law of the Sea, the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea, and the International Convention on Maritime Search and Rescue.
    Last updated: 19 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Extent of the EU’s protection against hybrid threats – E-000524/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission has undertaken several initiatives to protect democracy in the EU, in particular with the European Democracy Action Plan of 2020 and the Defence of Democracy Package of 2023[1].

    Their success is reflected, among other things, in the general satisfaction of respondents to standard Eurobarometer surveys with the way democracy works in the EU[2].

    As regards transparency of financial flows, several pieces of EU legislation are relevant. Regulation (EU) 2024/900 on the transparency and targeting of political advertising[3], which will enter into full application on 10 October 2025, will support national oversight of funding of political advertising and minimise the risk of information manipulation and foreign interference by requiring the provision, among others, of oversight authorities and record-keeping of information on the amounts received for political advertising services.

    As part of the Defence of Democracy package the Commission presented a legislative proposal that aims to enhance transparency and democratic accountability of interest representation activities on behalf of third countries which seek to influence policies, decision making and the democratic space. The proposal is currently being discussed by the co-legislators.

    In terms of following the money in general, Member States’ competent authorities will have better access to the information they need with the application of the anti-money laundering package[4], which was adopted by the co-legislators in 2024, and will enter into application in July 2027.

    In 2025, the Commission will propose a European Democracy Shield, which will, among other things, set out steps to combat foreign information manipulation, interference and disinformation.

    • [1] https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_23_6453.
    • [2] Standard Eurobarometer 102 — Autumn 2024 — November 2024 — Eurobarometer survey https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/surveys/detail/3215; Standard Eurobarometer 100 — Autumn 2023 — December 2023 — Eurobarometer survey https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/surveys/detail/3053; Standard Eurobarometer 98 — Winter 2022-2023 — February 2023 — Eurobarometer survey https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/surveys/detail/2872.
    • [3] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:32024R0900.
    • [4] https://finance.ec.europa.eu/financial-crime/anti-money-laundering-and-countering-financing-terrorism-eu-level_en#policy-making-timeline .

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Privatisation of preventive screening – E-001681/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The protection of personal data in the EU is ensured by the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)[1] which applies to both public and private organisations in the EU.

    Genetic data fall within the special categories of personal data which can be processed only if one of the conditions in Article 9(2) GDPR is fulfilled. This provides an additional layer of protection considering the potential risks arising from the processing of this type of data.

    Following the GDPR risk-based approach, controllers and processors must put in place adequate technical and organisational measures to ensure a level of security appropriate to the risk (Articles 5(1)(f) and 32 GDPR).

    If the envisaged processing is likely to result in a high risk, the controller has to conduct a Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA), and in some situations, to consult the competent Data Protection Authority (DPA).

    In line with Article 28 GDPR, the controller has to choose a processor that provides sufficient guarantees in terms of data protection.

    The binding contract or other legal act governing their relationship shall stipulate, among others, that the processor must ensure that its staff authorised to process the data have committed themselves to confidentiality. The GDPR does not impose the public disclosure of the contract, nor the funding.

    It follows that the Greek public authority, acting as controller, is responsible for ensuring that the data processing for the preventive screening meets the GDPR standards.

    The monitoring and enforcement of the application of the GDPR falls within the competence of the national DPAs and courts, without prejudice to the Commission’s competences as guardian of the Treaties.

    It is therefore for the Greek DPA to examine whether the ‘programmatic agreement’ complies with the GDPR.

    • [1] Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (GDPR), OJ L 119, 4.5.2016, p. 1-88.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – New measures adopted by the Italian Government that restrict freedom of information – E-002906/2024(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    Directive (EU) 2016/343 sets out rules on public references by public authorities to the guilt of a suspect or accused person prior to a conviction.

    It does not require specific limitations as to the publication by the press of procedural documents relating to the pre-trial stage of the proceedings.

    Without prejudice to national law protecting the freedom of press and other media, the directive only establishes minimum rules, requiring that the dissemination of any information by public authorities to the media must respect the presumption of innocence and not create the impression that the person is guilty before his or her guilt has been proven according to law.

    The 2024 Rule of Law report for Italy[1] noted that the legislative initiatives regulating access to and publication of certain judicial information were a source of concern for media stakeholders.

    The report also notes that the Italian Government considers these initiatives to be justified to guarantee the right to privacy and the presumption of innocence. The Commission will continue monitoring the developments in this respect in the framework of the Rule of Law Report.

    • [1] E uropean Commission, 2024 Rule of Law Report, ‘Country Chapter on the rule of law situation in Italy’ (SWD(2024) 812 final); https://commission.europa.eu/document/download/60d79a4f-49cd-4061-a18f-d3a4495d6485_en?filename=29_1_58066_coun_chap_italy_en.pdf.
    Last updated: 19 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Regulation (EU) 2020/741 on minimum requirements for water reuse – E-002381/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002381/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Christine Schneider (PPE)

    Numerous reports and observations from various Member States, in particular Germany, indicate that the practical implementation of Regulation (EU) 2020/741 has caused significant difficulties. Many farmers and municipalities lose access to treated waste water because many smaller projects are unable to meet the technical and administrative requirements of the Regulation. This runs counter to the Regulation’s objective of promoting water reuse and addressing water scarcity.

    • 1.How does the Commission assess the practical implementation of Regulation (EU) 2020/741, in particular as regards access to treated waste water for irrigation in agriculture in the Member States, and is the Commission aware that, as a result of the above-mentioned requirements, smaller farms and municipalities in particular have lost access to treated waste water and are instead having to increasingly resort to using valuable drinking water for irrigation?
    • 2.How does the Commission view the criticism that the current requirements of the Regulation could lead to a reduction in water reuse in practice, thus undermining the very objective of the Regulation?
    • 3.Does the Commission intend to evaluate Regulation (EU) 2020/741 in the light of real-world practical experience and feedback so far and, if necessary, propose adjustments to facilitate water reuse?

    Submitted: 12.6.2025

    Last updated: 19 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Conservation of birdlife in the face of an offshore wind project – E-002373/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002373/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Mélanie Disdier (PfE), Hans Neuhoff (ESN), Alexander Sell (ESN), António Tânger Corrêa (PfE), Jan-Peter Warnke (NI), Rody Tolassy (PfE), Jean-Paul Garraud (PfE), Marie Dauchy (PfE), Virginie Joron (PfE), Anne-Sophie Frigout (PfE), Pierre Pimpie (PfE), Fernand Kartheiser (NI)

    Under the Birds Directive (2009/147/EC), the killing or disturbance of protected species, as well as the degradation of their habitats, is strictly prohibited, in particular in Natura 2000 areas. However, the planned wind farm off the coast at Dunkirk, located in a Natura 2000 area, is raising concerns about its impact on protected species, such as seabirds and migratory birds[1].

    The decision to temporarily cease operating the Aumelas wind farm in Hérault[2], taken in order to protect endangered species, serves as a reminder that preserving biodiversity takes precedence over industrial projects, in accordance with EU law.

    • 1.Can the Commission confirm that the construction of the wind farm off the coast at Dunkirk fully complies with the obligations of the Birds Directive, in particular with regard to the assessment of the impact on protected species?
    • 2.What specific steps does the Commission intend to take to prevent the disturbance or destruction of bird habitats in this Natura 2000 area?
    • 3.How does the Commission ensure that the protective measures within the framework of this project are implemented and monitored?

    Submitted: 12.6.2025

    • [1] https://bancsdesflandres.n2000.fr/bancs-des-flandres/le-site-natura-2000-bancs-des-flandres/le-perimetre-du-site
    • [2] https://www.franceinfo.fr/environnement/biodiversite/animaux/la-justice-ordonne-l-arret-pour-quatre-mois-du-parc-eolien-d-aumelas-dans-l-herault-apres-la-mort-de-160-oiseaux-proteges_7175883.html
    Last updated: 19 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Harmful effects of sunbeds – E-001259/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    In Europe’s Beating Cancer Plan[1], the Commission indicated that it will ‘explore measures on exposure to ultraviolet radiation, including from sunbeds, which increases the risk of melanoma…’.

    Sunbeds are already covered by the EU’s Low Voltage Directive[2], which covers all safety aspects — including health risks — of electrical equipment. Therefore, all sunbeds used for tanning purposes must comply with the standards set in this directive, which covers cancer-related risks.

    The Commission concluded that more information on the effectiveness of preventive and mitigation measures is needed to have a comprehensive understanding of how policy recommendations could lead to a better protection of EU citizens from health risks associated with the use of sunbeds, beyond the protection already provided under the Low Voltage Directive.

    At this stage, further compelling new evidence including on the effectiveness of actions that would justify further measures is not available. Therefore, it would be premature to put forward a Commission Recommendation on sunbeds at this stage.

    The fourth edition of the European Code Against Cancer[3] already includes clear guidance on avoiding the use of sunbeds, a recommendation that is being considered to be maintained in the forthcoming fifth edition of the Code.

    • [1] https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/priorities-2019-2024/promoting-our-european-way-life/european-health-union/cancer-plan-europe_en.
    • [2] Directive 2014/35/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to the making available on the market of electrical equipment designed for use within certain voltage limits. OJ L 96, 29.3.2014, p. 357-374
    • [3] https://www.cancer.eu/cancer-prevention-the-european-code-against-cancer/.
    Last updated: 19 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Fair distribution of profits to farmers in Europe – E-001690/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The EU agri-food chain observatory (AFCO) was launched in 2024 as one of the actions that aim to strengthen the position of farmers in the food supply chain and reinforce trust between actors.

    As set out in its Terms of Reference[1], the purpose of AFCO is to advise the Commission and to exchange information and discuss with a view to establishing a common diagnosis of the situation across markets, and bring increased transparency on prices, cost structure, margin distribution and added value in the supply chain, while respecting confidentiality and competition rules.

    Market observatories, such as AFCO, provide advice and expertise and do not engage in policy discussions. In line with its Terms of Reference, by assessing and taking stock of the situation within the supply chain, the group provides inputs to inform policy responses by the Commission and other policy-makers.

    Members of the AFCO exchange information based on available evidence and facts. These include existing data collected by the Commission, such as the Directorate General for Agriculture and Rural Development and Eurostat, as well as information made available by members in full respect of confidentiality and competition rules.

    The Commission assesses the quality of data. Potential limitations in their use, comparability or interpretation are taken into account and clearly communicated when data are disseminated.

    The AFCO has convened three times since its creation. Its work currently focuses on identifying relevant data sources and data gaps, with a view to enabling the group to monitor the agri-food supply chain.

    • [1] https://ec.europa.eu/transparency/expert-groups-register/screen/expert-groups/consult?lang=en&groupID=3949.
    Last updated: 19 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Strengthening support for renewable hydrogen to meet EU energy and climate targets – E-001831/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    Since 2020, the EU has set up a comprehensive regulatory framework to support the scale up of renewable hydrogen, including enabling financing under the European Hydrogen Bank (EHB).

    After two auctions already implemented under this financial initiative to support hydrogen production in Europe[1], by the end of 2025 the Commission will launch a third auction, with a budget of up to EUR 1 billion from the Innovation Fund (IF).

    The IF also provides funding to hydrogen-related projects through its regular grants[2]. By the end of 2025, the results of the latest regular grant call (IF24) will be published and a new call will be opened.

    Moreover, to enhance impact from its calls, the IF implemented the ‘as-a-Service’ feature[3], allowing Member States[4] to allocate national funding in addition to the Innovation Fund. This feature will be available again in upcoming calls.

    The Commission also works to establish joint European auctions for imports of renewable hydrogen. Under a Team Europe approach, willing Member States will be able to pool funding and attract competitive bids from third-country producers, thus further supporting the decarbonisation of their industry and transport sectors as well as contributing to wider goals such as the development of key import infrastructure corridors.

    The Commission will launch the Mechanism to support market development of hydrogen[5] in the third quarter of 2025. It will bring together buyers and sellers[6] on an online platform, enabling them to find potential commercial partners, and connecting them with financial support.

    • [1] Through the three auction calls, the EHB will have made available EUR 3 billion in grants: https://climate.ec.europa.eu/eu-action/eu-funding-climate-action/innovation-fund/competitive-bidding_en.
    • [2] Under the IF, more than 40 projects covering the full hydrogen value chain are already receiving a total of EUR 3 billion in regular grants.
    • [3] https://climate.ec.europa.eu/eu-action/eu-funding-climate-action/innovation-fund/competitive-bidding_en#auctions-as-a-service-aaas.
    • [4] Germany, Austria, Spain and Lithuania have already contributed, together, with almost EUR 1.2 billion in national resources in the IF23 and IF24 Auctions.
    • [5] In accordance with the mandate received pursuant to Regulation (EU) 1789/2024 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 on the internal markets for renewable gas, natural gas and hydrogen.
    • [6] The Hydrogen Mechanism covers renewable and low-carbon hydrogen and its derivatives (ammonia, methanol, eSAFs).
    Last updated: 19 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Press release – Human rights breaches in Georgia, Iran and Mali

    Source: European Parliament

    On Thursday, Parliament adopted human rights resolutions on Georgia, Iran and Mali.

    Media freedom in Georgia and the case of Mzia Amaglobeli

    MEPs are deeply concerned about arbitrary detentions in Georgia and the government’s harassment of and violence against journalists. They demand the immediate and unconditional release of Georgian journalist Mzia Amaglobeli, condemning her arrest as politically motivated . They strongly condemn the Georgian Dream regime’s systemic assault on democratic institutions, political opposition, independent media, civil society and judicial independence. They call for independent investigations and urge the authorities to act immediately to ensure journalists’ safety.

    Parliament also calls for the release of all political prisoners, including activists, opposition leaders and former President Mikheil Saakashvili. In the resolution, MEPs call urgently for the repeal of repressive laws, restoration of democracy, and full protection of media freedom and civil liberties. The EU must step up its support for Georgian civil society, while pressing for sanctions on officials responsible for democratic backsliding, MEPs add.

    They also express grave concern at the latest wave of assaults against Georgian non‑governmental organisations, which is putting the work of targeted organisations at risk.

    The resolution was adopted by 324 votes in favour, 25 against and 87 abstentions. For further details, the full version will be available here. (19.6.2025)

    The case of Dr Ahmadreza Djalali in Iran

    Parliament condemns Dr Ahmadreza Djalali’s sham trial, torture and lack of access to medical care, and urge Iran to provide him with legal representation and defence and allow contacts with his family.

    MEPs call on Iran to put a moratorium on executions and abolish the death penalty. They urge Sweden and relevant member states and the European External Action Service to adopt targeted measures in response to Iran’s continued detention of EU nationals, including Cécile Kohler and Jacques Paris.

    They reiterate their call on the Council to designate the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps a terrorist organisation and extend EU sanctions to those who take EU nationals hostage, execute opposition members en masse, and commit other human rights violations. They demand that UN human rights mechanisms be fully activated in Iran, including the Special Rapporteur. They also call on EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas to raise Djalali’s case in public and during all engagements with her Iranian counterparts.

    The resolution was adopted by 486 votes in favour, 8 against and 29 abstentions. For further details, the full version will be available here. (19.6.2025)

    Dissolution of political parties and crackdown on the opposition in Mali

    Parliament condemns the dissolution of political parties in Mali and the repression of the opposition. MEPs criticise the authorities for actions that undermine democracy, human rights, and fundamental freedoms, including freedom of expression, association, and peaceful assembly, and demand respect for international human rights law and Mali’s own commitments.

    They note the transitional president’s 2024 request to create conditions for transparent and peaceful elections, and call for the immediate release of those arrested or abducted for political reasons, an end to repression and intimidation, and guarantees for the safety of opposition members and civil society actors.

    Parliament also denounces the ongoing violence and Islamist terrorism in Mali, and stresses the need for accountability for human rights violations and war crimes committed by the Wagner Group/Africa Corps, and reaffirms the EU’s support for multi-party democracy, civil society, and human rights in Mali. MEPs express serious concern over the growing illegal migration flows from Mali, fuelled by growing insecurity, political instability and economic stagnation and call on the Malian authorities to take full responsibility for preventing uncontrolled departures.

    The resolution was adopted by 511 votes in favour, 14 against and with 25 abstentions. For further details, the full version will be available here. (19.6.2025)

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Concerns about the European Food Safety Authority’s risk assessment of soy leghemoglobin – E-001090/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    A high level of protection of health and the environment underpins the EU legal framework on genetically modified food and feed, by requiring a prior authorisation based on a comprehensive risk assessment performed by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA).

    The risk assessment for soy leghemoglobin referred to by the Honourable Members was performed by two scientific Panels[1],[2], following established methodologies and relevant risk assessment guidance.

    The data submitted concerned the actual strain used for producing this soy leghemoglobin ( MXY0541) and both EFSA Panels[3],[4] concluded favourably on the safety of the soy leghemoglobin produced from this strain.

    Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003[5] provides for the protection of confidential information while ensuring that the key elements of the Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO) Panel opinion are disclosed to the public in accordance with its Article 30 and the relevant provisions of Regulation (EC) No 178/2002[6].

    In compliance with Article 6(7) of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, EFSA did not disclose certain parts of the opinion in the published version.

    The Commission is in the process of adopting a decision on the request for confidential treatment of certain information in the dossier, made by the applicant, which EFSA took into account when redacting parts of the Panel opinion.

    Should the Commission decide not to grant confidentiality requested by the applicant for certain elements, the Commission will ask EFSA to adapt the published opinion accordingly and will reopen the public consultation based on the updated version.

    The Commission is currently considering EFSA’s opinion in view of preparing a draft decision concerning this application in accordance with the procedure of Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003.

    • [1] The EFSA Panel on GMO.
    • [2] The EFSA Panel on Food Additive and Flavourings.
    • [3] https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2024.9060.
    • [4] https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8822.
    • [5] http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2003/1829/oj.
    • [6] http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2002/178/oj.
    Last updated: 19 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Press release – Clean Industrial Deal must marry industrial competitiveness with climate action

    Source: European Parliament

    The Industrial Decarbonisation Bank and action plan for affordable energy are crucial for the competitiveness and resilience of European industry, MEPs say.

    The resolution, adopted on Thursday 19 June in response to the European Commission’s Clean Industrial Deal plan, stresses the need to combine climate action with industrial competitiveness.

    It underscores the importance of the newly established Industrial Decarbonisation Bank, which MEPs consider vital for scaling up investment in clean technologies. Investment should be based on carbon impact, scalability, and security of supply, they say.

    Parliament welcomes lead markets for European-made clean, circular and low-carbon products, and stresses the need to stimulate demand through public and private procurement.

    MEPs also advocate for the protection of the EU market from unfair competition and the dumping of industrial overcapacity from third countries. They underline the importance of an effective carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM) in the context of phasing out free allowances under the emissions trading system (ETS).

    Faster permitting procedures

    The resolution addresses the importance of regulatory simplification and the need to streamline permitting procedures to support the transition and innovation efforts of small businesses. MEPs want to simplify funding applications, reduce reporting obligations, and fast-track small projects.

    They also want to build the business case for permanent carbon removals in upcoming legislative reviews, as carbon management, including capture, storage, transport, and utilisation, may be necessary for hard-to-abate sectors, they say.

    Affordable energy action plan

    MEPs support the action plan for affordable energy and demand measures to boost cross-border energy infrastructure and complete the energy union. The current fragmentation of regulatory oversight and investment planning across Member States is hampering integration and electrification, they say. MEPs also call on Member States, transmission system operators and the Commission to do more to promote cross-border electricity trading.

    Quote

    “European industry is facing enormous challenges, while a strong industrial base is essential for our competitiveness and strategic autonomy. The Clean Industrial Deal offers a strategy for a competitive and decarbonised European industry. At the same time, it seeks to protect our autonomy and secure jobs. This Deal is an important first step, but time is running out. We urge the Commission to act without delay and raise its level of ambition. When it comes to industrial policy, European cooperation is more crucial than ever” said lead MEP Tom Berendsen (EPP, Netherlands).

    The resolution was adopted with 381 votes to 173, with 13 abstentions.

    Background: Clean Industrial Deal

    Presented by the European Commission in February, the Clean Industrial Deal aims to support the competitiveness and resilience of European industry. It focuses mainly on two sectors: energy-intensive industries and clean technology, and aims to lower energy costs via an action plan on affordable energy. The Clean Industrial Deal also seeks to boost demand for clean products, further finance the clean transition and improve circularity, access to critical raw materials and the establishment of sectoral skills for strategic industries.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Negotiations on the abolition of tariffs on imports of fisheries products from the Maldives – E-001612/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Maldives expressed interest in joining an Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA) during the third EU-Maldives Senior Officials’ Meeting (SOM) in 2022.

    The Maldives’ objective in joining an EPA is to benefit from duty-free, quota-free access to the EU market, especially for their main export product (tuna), which they lost after their graduation from the Generalised System of Preferences in 2015.

    At the fourth EU-Maldives SOM in 2023, the Maldives stressed their interest in joining the Samoa Agreement. This agreement provides a legal framework for EU relations with countries of Africa, Caribbean and Pacific, including a possibility of concluding with them economic partnership agreements. On 1 July 2024, the Maldives signed the Samoa Agreement.

    In subsequent meetings with representatives of the government of the Maldives the Commission provided a non-paper outlining the steps required to join the EPA between the EU and the five Eastern and Southern African (ESA5) countries, the most relevant one given the Maldives’ geographical position.

    To proceed, the Maldives need to (i) sign the Samoa Agreement (completed in 2024); (ii) join the ESA group in the Organisation of African, Caribbean, and Pacific States (status unclear); and (iii) submit a formal request to join the EU-ESA5 EPA and table a market access offer to the Commission.

    An accession to the EPA would eventually require a joint EU-ESA5 decision in line with the EPA’s procedures.

    Despite all the explanation provided by the Commission, to date, the Maldives have neither submitted a formal request to join the EPA nor tabled a market access offer. These steps are needed before a provisional timeline for the Maldives’ potential accession to the EU-ESA5 EPA can be established.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Demolition of EU- and Member State-funded structures in the occupied Palestinian territories – E-003028/2024(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The assessments of Legal Service of the Commission are part of the internal decision-making procedures of the Commission and they are not published.

    On the issue of demolitions, the EU’s position for the EU-Israel Association Council’s 13th meeting that took place in Brussels on 24 February 2025 stated that [1]‘The EU calls on Israel to halt continued settlement expansion and related activities, including state land declarations as well as evictions, demolitions, confiscation and forced transfers of Palestinians, which have reached record levels in the past year.

    Furthermore, the EU strongly condemns the demolitions of the structures funded by the EU or its Member States and expects that Israel make good the damage in accordance with international law.

    Since 7 October 2023, increased access restrictions by Israel in the West Bank have gravely impacted socioeconomic conditions for Palestinians.

    The EU calls on Israel to allow for a tangible improvement of freedom of movement and access for the Palestinians, to enable accelerated Palestinian construction, as well as social and economic development in Area C, and reverse the worsening of living conditions for Palestinians in Area C’.

    • [1] https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-6511-2025-INIT/en/pdf.
    Last updated: 19 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Latest news – 25 June 2025 – meeting – Delegation to the Africa-EU Parliamentary Assembly

    Source: European Parliament

    On Wednesday, 25 June 2025, 13.30-15.00, the DAFR delegation will hold an Ordinary meeting in Brussels (room: SPINELLI 5E2).

    The main point will be an:Exchange of views to commemorate the International Day in Support of Victims of Torture (26 June), and as a follow-up to the European Parliament (EP) Resolution of 23 January 2025 on the human rights situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), in the presence of:
    Jean-Jacques Wondo, Belgian-Congolese military expert and former death row inmate in Kinshasa prison, DRC.

    The meeting will be webstreamed.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Banking: Release of STDF Annual Report 2024 — Driving Change as Pathways to Trading Safely

    Source: World Trade Organization

    The Report covers a milestone year for the STDF. In addition to celebrating its 20th anniversary in 2024, this year’s report highlights key achievements, including progress in strengthening SPS capacity in developing countries as well as mainstreaming gender and environmental issues. The report also includes an external evaluation of the STDF’s performance.

    Key results

    In 2024, the STDF made significant progress in enhancing SPS measures across 11 countries and supporting SPS legislative, regulatory and policy changes in 19 countries, in addition to catalysing new work on public-private partnerships, digitalization and SPS e-certification, and mainstreaming cross-cutting issues.  

    Highlights include:

    • In India, the STDF’s spices project improved safety and quality, enabling over 80% of tested spices to meet Codex Alimentarius Maximum Residue Limits (MRLs) for increased access to premium markets.
    • In Guinea, an STDF project strengthened the country’s phytosanitary system, securing mango export approval for the EU market and increasing potato production by 112%, which opened new opportunities for agricultural exports to regional and international markets.
    • In 2024, the STDF continued addressing gender challenges in line with its Gender Action Plan. Gender analyses in over 10 countries identified gender needs and opportunities, which is enhancing attention to gender equality in SPS capacity development.
    • The STDF published an assessment on attention to the environment, biodiversity and climate resilience in its work. The assessment recognized that two-thirds of project applications explicitly address factors related to the environment and identified win-win opportunities to strengthen environment mainstreaming, while maintaining the STDF’s focus on SPS capacity and safe trade.

    Looking back and planning for the future

    An external evaluation (May 2024) confirmed the STDF’s continued relevance, and the high satisfaction of stakeholders with the partnership’s progress and results. It also contributed to the development of the STDF’s new Strategy for 2025-2030, which was created in 2024 with founding partners, donors, developing country experts and others involved in the STDF’s work.

    “The STDF has been at the forefront of creating pathways to ensure that trade is both safe and sustainable, contributing to economic growth and food security across regions,” said Dr Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, WTO Director-General. “Over the past two decades, the STDF’s support has enabled small-scale producers in Africa, Asia, Latin America, and the Caribbean to meet standards and expand exports, generating higher earnings, creating jobs, and driving inclusive development.”

    As the landscape of aid evolves, the STDF remains committed to helping developing countries benefit from trade through innovative SPS solutions, ensuring that trade remains inclusive and beneficial for all. 

    The STDF Annual Report can be viewed and downloaded here.

    The STDF is a global multi-stakeholder partnership facilitating safe and inclusive trade, established by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations, the World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH), the World Bank Group, the World Health Organization (WHO) and the WTO, which houses and manages the partnership. The STDF responds to evolving sanitary and phytosanitary needs, drives inclusive trade, and contributes to sustainable economic growth, poverty reduction, food security and climate resilience, in support of the United Nations’ Global Goals.

    Share

    MIL OSI Global Banks

  • MIL-OSI Banking: Timor-Leste kicks off negotiations to join Government Procurement Agreement

    Source: World Trade Organization

    Ambassador Antonio Da Conceicao of Timor-Leste stated to the Committee: “Joining the Government Procurement Agreement is part of a broader national strategy to strengthen good governance, align with international standards and support our successful integration into the global economy. “

    Timor-Leste as part of its accession to the WTO committed to submitting an initial market access offer in its GPA accession negotiation in August of this year.

    The Committee also discussed the well-advanced accession negotiations of Albania and Costa Rica. Both members submitted their “final” market access offers earlier this year and will continue to engage with GPA parties, with a view to finalizing their accession processes as soon as possible. China’s accession negotiation was also discussed.

    The Committee also welcomed Guatemala as its 37th observer. 

     e-GPA Notification System launched

    The Committee noted that the e-GPA Notification System, launched on 16 June, marks a milestone in the digital transformation of Committee work. It will facilitate GPA parties’ compliance with their transparency obligations under the Agreement.

    The system enables the online submission of notifications required under the GPA 2012 (e.g. on government procurement statistics, procurement thresholds in national currencies, national implementing legislation, etc.) and related communications by GPA parties to the Committee.

    Background

    The GPA 2012 is a plurilateral agreement that aims to open government procurement markets among its parties on a reciprocal basis and to the extent agreed between GPA parties. It also aims to make government procurement more transparent and to promote good governance.

    The Agreement currently has 22 parties, covering 49 WTO members, including the European Union and its 27 member states (counted as one party). While open to all WTO members, it is binding only for those members that have acceded to it. The list of current GPA parties can be found here.

    Reciprocal market opening assists GPA parties in purchasing goods and services that offer the best value for money. The Agreement provides legal guarantees of non-discrimination for the goods, services and suppliers of GPA parties in covered procurement activities, which are worth an estimated USD 1.7 trillion annually. Government procurement typically accounts for about 15 per cent of developed and developing economies’ GDP. 

    Share

    MIL OSI Global Banks

  • Ministry of Culture to celebrate International Yoga Day at 150 iconic sites across India

    Source: Government of India

    Source: Government of India (4)

    In a nationwide celebration of the 11th International Day of Yoga (IDY), the Ministry of Culture will organize yoga sessions on June 21, at 100 iconic tourist destinations and 50 cultural heritage sites across the country. This initiative complements the main national event, led by the Ministry of Ayush, taking place in Visakhapatnam. Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister N. Chandrababu Naidu, and Deputy Chief Minister Pawan Kalyan will participate in the event there.

    Union Minister for Culture and Tourism, Gajendra Singh Shekhawat, will join the celebrations at the historic Mehrangarh Fort in Jodhpur, Rajasthan.

    This initiative seeks to blend yoga with India’s rich cultural legacy by hosting sessions at UNESCO World Heritage Sites and other notable landmarks. Among the selected heritage sites are Charaideo Maidam in Assam, Rani Ki Vav and Dholavira in Gujarat, Hampi and Pattadakal in Karnataka, and Khajuraho and Sanchi Stupa in Madhya Pradesh. The list also includes the Sun Temple at Konark in Odisha, Elephanta Caves in Maharashtra, and Brihadisvara Temple in Tamil Nadu.

    Other significant locations include Golconda Fort and the Salarjung Museum in Hyderabad, Humayun’s Tomb, Purana Qila, and Safdarjung Tomb in Delhi, and Jallianwala Bagh in Amritsar. Chittorgarh and Kumbhalgarh Forts in Rajasthan, Leh Palace in Ladakh, Pari Mahal in Srinagar, Bekal Fort in Kerala, and Hazarduari and Cooch Behar Palaces in West Bengal are also among the venues.

    The Ministry’s various departments and affiliated institutions are actively involved in organizing and executing the events, underscoring the government’s effort to promote wellness through the integration of yoga and cultural heritage.

  • MIL-OSI United Nations: Experts of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women Commend Thailand on Gender Inclusive Climate Action, Ask about Combatting Patriarchal Stereotypes and Ensuring Education for Marginalised Girls

    Source: United Nations – Geneva

    The Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women today concluded its consideration of the eighth periodic report of Thailand, with Committee Experts commending Thailand on its climate change master plan, which was gender inclusive, while raising questions about how the State was combatting patriarchal stereotypes and ensuring the right to education for marginalised girls. 

    A Committee Expert congratulated Thailand on the steps being taken to revise the climate change master plan which focused on gender and social inclusive climate action, including climate finance, adaptation and mitigation, recognising that women and girls experienced disproportionately greater loss and damage from the impacts of climate change. 

    Another Expert said Thailand remained a patriarchal society where women were expected to be caregivers while men were seen as leaders, which was reinforced in the media and other avenues.  What programmes were in place to dismantle harmful gender stereotypes?  Were there programmes to engage men and boys in efforts to transform discriminatory social norms?  What mechanisms were in place to ensure that women from all communities could access justice and public services without stigma or discrimination? 

    A Committee Expert said the Committee was concerned about the high dropout rates among stateless and refugee girls and the fact that Patani Malay girls were discouraged from continuing their education due to early marriage and lack of education in Malay. Were there policies specifically targeted for expanding education to minorities?  What steps were being taken to ensure the safety of girls living in the Southern Border Provinces?

    The delegation said Thailand was aware that gender stereotypes were ingrained, and this would take a lifetime effort to overcome.  Currently, changing the mindset of the people was difficult.  It was important to raise awareness and re-learn what was appropriate.  The Department of Women’s Affairs coordinated with academics to work with young people on a project to identify sexist language in textbooks in schools.  A guidebook had been created and distributed to teachers to provide guidance on how to combat harmful gender stereotypes in schools. 

    The delegation said there were mechanisms in place to ensure women from marginalised groups received education.  There were schools established in the Southern Border Provinces, with border patrol officers teaching the students.  The State provided safety in all areas to prevent threats to students. A religious school, supported by the Government, was located in the Southern Border Provinces, providing additional opportunities for students. 

    Introducing the report, Ramrung Worawat, Director-General of the Department of Women’s Affairs and Family Development, Ministry of Social Development and Human Security of Thailand, head of the delegation, said the act amending the Civil and Commercial Code (no. 24) or the equal marriage act came into force in January 2025.  The act raised the minimum marriage age from 17 to 18 years old, adopted gender-neutral terms on marriage, permitted child adoption by same-sex couples, and ensured inheritance rights to them.  Recent results of the general election in 2023 reflected a notable increase in the number of women and lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex individuals elected to leadership positions.  The current cabinet included eight females at ministerial rank, the highest number in Thailand’s political history.   

    In closing remarks, Ms. Worawat said the discussion with the Committee had been very fruitful. The State would aim to take forward the Committee’s recommendations, with a will to transform them into concrete actions.

    In her closing remarks, Nahla Haidar, Committee Chair, thanked Thailand for the constructive dialogue which had provided further insight into the situation of women and girls in the country. 

    The delegation of Thailand was comprised of representatives of the Ministry of Social Development and Human Security; the Ministry of Public Health; the Ministry of Foreign Affairs; the Administrative Centre of the Southern Border Provinces; the Royal Thai Police; the Office of the Attorney General; the National Institute of Development Administration; and the Permanent Mission of Thailand to the United Nations Office at Geneva.

    The Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women’s ninety-first session is being held from 16 June to 4 July.  All documents relating to the Committee’s work, including reports submitted by States parties, can be found on the session’s webpage.  Meeting summary releases can be found here.  The webcast of the Committee’s public meetings can be accessed via the UN Web TV webpage.

    The Committee will next meet at 10 a.m. on Friday, 20 June to begin its consideration of the eighth periodic report of Ireland (CEDAW/C/IRL/8).

    Report

    The Committee has before it the eighth periodic report of Thailand (CEDAW/C/THA/8).

    Presentation of Report

    RAMRUNG WORAWAT, Director-General of the Department of Women’s Affairs and Family Development, Ministry of Social Development and Human Security of Thailand, head of the delegation, said women made up just over half of Thailand’s population and almost 70 per cent of those were women between 15 to 59 years of age.  Since the submission of Thailand’s last report in 2017, Thailand had been revising and drafting laws to further promote women’s rights, gender equality, and the elimination of all forms of discrimination against women. 

    The act amending the Civil and Commercial Code (no. 24) or the equal marriage act came into force in January 2025.  The act raised the minimum marriage age from 17 to 18 years old, adopted gender-neutral terms on marriage, permitted child adoption by same-sex couples, and ensured inheritance rights to them.  In addition, the gender equality act was being reviewed to ensure it further aligned with international standards. 

    The draft anti-discrimination act would strengthen the legal basis for the elimination of discrimination on all grounds, including sex and gender, and address situations of multiple and intersecting discrimination.  Furthermore, the draft act on the protection and promotion of the way of life of ethnic groups was being considered by the Parliament.  The act focused on eliminating discrimination and promoting equality based on cultural diversity.  The plan of action on women’s development (2023-2027) was developed to ensure women’s participation in socio-economic development and to promote their leadership in public spaces. 

    The National Women’s Development Policy and Strategy Committee and the Committee for the Promotion of Gender Equality were responsible for setting and driving gender equality policies.  A substantial budget was allocated for the main agencies, with an additional budget allocated to assist specific groups of women and advance gender equality in an integrated manner.  A strategic plan for the promotion and protection of children and youth in the use of online media was being developed, and a coordinating centre, Child Online Protection Action Thailand, was established to lead collaborative efforts with partners. 

    Thailand continued its policy of inclusive education and provided 15 years of free education for all children without discrimination.  The country supported royal-initiated “Phiengluang Schools” for special target groups in border or underserved areas with limited access to rights and social welfare.  An online teacher training programme aimed to help schools and teachers plan inclusive sexuality education. 

    Economic empowerment measures had been introduced to protect both formal and informal female workers.  The Women’s Role Development Fund was established to enable women to pursue careers and income opportunities, improve women’s access to financial resources, and expand childcare services for children under three years old to promote equality in family responsibilities.  The child support grant programme and the state welfare card programme provided monthly allowances and financial assistance to support low-income households. 

    Women were increasingly taking part in politics at the national and local levels and within the public administration.  Recent results of the general election in 2023 reflected a notable increase in the number of women and lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex individuals elected to leadership positions.  The current cabinet included eight females at ministerial rank, the highest number in Thailand’s political history.  There were currently 15 female provincial governors, including the appointment of the first Muslim female governor of Pattani Province in 2022. 

    The Thai Government promoted universal access to public health services and implemented measures to ensure that vulnerable women, including informal female workers and registered migrant women, could access healthcare.  All women and girls were guaranteed equal access to health services under the Universal Health Coverage Scheme.  The most challenging task for Thai Government agencies was advanced and disaggregated data collection.  Enhanced data collection would enable Thailand to better implement policies and undertake targeted actions to empower specific groups. 

    In October 2024, the Cabinet approved guidelines to accelerate the resolution of nationality and legal status issues for long-term migrants and their children born in Thailand, to ensure the legal recognition and integration of stateless individuals who had lived in the Kingdom for extended periods, as well as their Thai-born descendants. 

    The draft policy on administration and development in the Southern Border Provinces (2025-2027) was developed to support vulnerable groups, strengthen family and community roles in problem-solving, and develop networks of women and youth to foster peace at the family and community level.  The Coordination Centre for Women and Children in the Southern Border Provinces was established as a joint mechanism between the Government and civil society, serving as a platform to coordinate and mobilise resources, receive complaints, and resolve issues involving women and children.

    Thailand had developed a national adaptation plan for climate change, with a strong emphasis on gender dimensions at every stage, from planning and decision-making to community participation.  The country was committed to promoting gender equality and to upholding and protecting the human rights of women, girls, lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex individuals, and those facing multiple and intersecting forms of discrimination.  Thailand’s progress in gender equality was not just a matter of fulfilling international obligations, but a national priority. 

    Statement by the National Human Rights Institution

    PORNPRAPAI GANJANARINTR, Chairperson of the National Human Rights Commission of Thailand, said while the Thai Government had made efforts to promote gender equality, many women, especially those from vulnerable groups, continued to face serious barriers in accessing their basic rights.  Women with disabilities faced violence and barriers in accessing the justice system, were subjected to forced sterilisation and abortion, and were excluded from decision-making processes.  Ethnic women remained without legal status and were not protected under the law.  Women in detention faced overcrowding, with 46 per cent of women’s detention facilities in Thailand exceeding their capacity, leading to poor hygiene, limited space, and mental health issues. 

    These cases illustrated that many women were still blocked from accessing basic rights due to deep-rooted discrimination.  The National Human Rights Commission of Thailand believed that the structural reform needed action in three key areas: inclusive participation in policymaking bodies at different levels; legal reform and proper enforcement; and the empowerment of women.  It was vital to ensure that every woman, regardless of her background, could fully enjoy her rights.

    Questions by a Committee Expert

    RANGITA DE SILVA DE ALWIS, Committee Expert and Country Rapporteur

    signalled two significant law reform initiatives.  Thailand was the first country in Southeast Asia to guarantee same sex marriage in 2024. The marriage equality bill had helped bend the arch of justice toward all.  The organic act on anti-corruption (No. 2) included provisions to protect those who reported corruption. 

    The Committee looked forward to the expedited revision of the domestic violence law and the new sex worker protection law.  Thailand’s national artificial intelligence strategy must remain vigilant as this was an important new frontier for gender justice and women’s leadership.  Thailand was encouraged to cite the Convention as an authoritative tool in all jurisprudence. 

    How would Thailand broaden the civic space for female journalists and female human rights defenders? How did Thailand provide protection from arbitrary arrest for women human rights defenders?  How were they ensured the right to a fair trial?  How were they protected from online crimes and cyber harassment?  How did the Safe Internet Coalition address hate speech and tech-facilitated gender-based violence?  How was free speech for women guaranteed in politics? 

    Despite the de facto moratorium on the death penalty, Thailand had one of the largest proportions of women on death row, predominately for drug-related offenses. Many of these women had faced numerous stressors throughout their lives, including mental health problems.  Would Thailand consider reviewing mandatory sentencing guidelines so that specific exculpatory or mitigatory factors such as homelessness and metal health were considered? 

    Thailand should be lauded for its women, peace and security plan, which addressed both traditional and non-traditional security challenges.  Not citing the Convention in relation to climate change was a missed opportunity.  How were Muslim women, indigenous women, and lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex women engaged as peacemakers?  Would cyber security be considered in the women, peace and security plan? 

    Responses by the Delegation

    The delegation said pregnant women were entitled to paid maternity leave, to protect the health and safety of mothers and children.  This was considered a form of positive discrimination.  Male, female and lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex inmates were separated in prisons to ensure their rights.  Thailand recognised the important role of women human rights defenders, and they had been identified as a key target group under the national human rights plan.  The plan included special provisions for developing laws and mechanisms to protect this group.  Thailand had been forced to strengthen its legislative framework to create a safe and enabling environment for human rights defenders.  The anti-corruption act aimed to protect whistleblowers reporting corruption or public misconduct. 

    A course had been developed to promote internet awareness among children, youth and older persons.  In Thailand, most victims of online scams were older persons.  The implementation of the training was carried out in collaboration with public and private companies, academics and non-governmental organizations.  The training fostered skills to ensure safe and secure internet use.  Work to strengthen child and youth protection mechanisms on online media was driven by child protection committees and child protection centres. 

    The Department of Corrections was fully committed to ensuring the protection of the rights of all women in custody.  Special attention was given to the emotional wellbeing of women prisoners and their accompanying children.  Women were subject to non-invasive scans to avoid invasive strip searches.  Women prisoners underwent initial screenings by medical staff upon entry, and were ensured that their specific health needs were fulfilled.  Counselling services were provided to female inmates at least one month, and those who required further psychological support were identified. 

    Female death row inmates benefitted from the right to communicate with their family.  For pregnant women facing capital punishment, the sentence would be suspended until three years after the child was born. The human rights of female death row inmates were ensured, while also upholding legal and ethical safeguards.

    Thailand had participated in many United Nations peacekeeping operations for several decades, and believed female peacekeepers helped foster trust within the communities. The State was committed to providing more female peacekeepers.  Thailand was finalising the national action plan on women, peace and security for 2024 to 2027, which would focus on women affected by conflict-affected situations. It was expected to be launched by the end of 2025.  Gender initiatives had been integrated into several aspects of the peacekeeping module, including training courses. 

    The Southern Border Provinces Administrative Centre had established the subdistrict Peace Councils in 317 subdistricts.  Thailand’s climate change response aimed to allocate a budget for funding assistance to support women engaging in climate change and revise laws which created barriers for women’s participation. 

    Questions by Committee Experts

    A Committee Expert recognised important advances, including the marriage equality act, and the adoption of a national strategy on this issue.  What measures had the State party adopted to ensure the territorialised adoption of gender policies in areas affected by armed conflict?  What measures had been taken to harmonise religious and customary laws with State legislation and gender equality?  How was it ensured that data collected reflected the multiple inequalities by marginalised groups? 

    Another Expert said the Committee was happy to note that the Government had improved relevant policies and regulations and formulated a national action plan for women’s development.  During the pandemic, the Government took a variety of measures to improve women’s working measures and legal provisions.  Would the State party adopt temporary special measures to address the persistent underrepresentation of women in the public and private sectors? 

    Would special measures be adopted to address intersecting forms of discrimination faced by women from marginalised groups, including indigenous women and elderly women? Would temporary special measures be adopted to further reduce poverty and levels of violence for women in Southern Border Provinces, including female genital mutilation?  Would these measures be coupled with capacity building to ensure their effectiveness?

    Responses by the Delegation

    The delegation said Thailand had established gender-responsive budgeting.  Seminars had been organised by Government officials and representatives of the private sector to ensure that gender-responsive budgeting was understood, and that women and girls could benefit from the national budget.  The private business sector cooperated with United Nations Women to integrate gender-responsive budgeting into business operations. 

    A study had been conducted which focused on the allocation of quotas for women and gender diverse individuals at national and local levels of politics.  The Government encouraged political parties to include women proportionally to men in their candidate lists.  Thailand’s number of female candidates had dramatically increased since 2019 and was on a positive trend.   

    Under the application of Islamic law in certain provinces, the Islamic family law was currently applied to Muslim citizens in the Southern Border Provinces.  A hybrid court system was responsible for handling cases involving disputes with family cases.  Muslim women who were victims of domestic violence and sexual violence could seek assistance through alternative avenues.  Marriages were regulated under the Central Islamic Committee, which prohibited marriage for anyone under the age of 17.  Most of the Southern Border Provinces were Muslim.  There were also channels for grievances for Islamic women, including remedies for victims affected by the conduct of officials. Assistance had been provided to more than 3,000 victims, and remedy was also provided to those affected by violence in the Southern Border Provinces.  Scholarships and education support was provided to children affected by the unrest. 

    Questions by Committee Experts

    A Committee Expert said patriarchal practices continued to drive high rates of gender-based violence.  Current frameworks prioritised family reunification over the protection of the survivors.  How was it ensured that survivor centred protection and legal remedies were available to all victims, including those in conflict-affected areas?  Were there plans to enact comprehensive legislation which criminalised online violence against women?  How was it ensured that survivors could report cases of violence safely without fear of reprisals?  How were gender-based violence policies being monitored and evaluated? 

    Thailand remained a patriarchal society where women were expected to be caregivers while men were seen as leaders, which was reinforced in the media and other avenues. What programmes were in place to dismantle harmful gender stereotypes?  Were there programmes to engage men and boys in efforts to transform discriminatory social norms?  What mechanisms were in place to ensure that women from all communities could access justice and public services without stigma or discrimination?  What steps was the State party taking to explicitly criminalise and eliminate harmful practices such as female genital mutilation and bride abduction, and to conduct awareness campaigns on their impact on women’s rights?

    Another Expert asked what steps the State party would take to effectively combat labour trafficking of women?  The anti-trafficking act allowed courts to waive punishments for parents who forced their children into labour due to extreme poverty and other extenuating circumstances; this was unacceptable.  How did the State party intend to ensure the protection of the girl child from being trafficked by her parents?  What steps was the State party taking to ensure the effective implementation of the national referral mechanism throughout the country. 

    The Committee commended the State party for the significant efforts made to bring the perpetrators of trafficking in persons to justice, including corrupt officials who protected traffickers.  While training was provided to police, immigration and labour officials, and prosecutors and judges, it was not mandatory for new judges.  What steps would be taken to ensure all those responsible for trafficking cases and prosecutions were adequately trained? How did the State party envisage regulating prostitution in the future?  Would sex workers be decriminalised and prostitution be legal? 

    Another Expert asked what the State was doing to combat cyber trafficking, which was an increasingly prevalent issue? 

    RANGITA DE SILVA DE ALWIS, Committee Expert and Country Rapporteur, said the Thai President had been the victim of a voice scam.  How were scams tackled in the context of women in political and public life? 

    Responses by the Delegation 

    The delegation said the domestic violence protection act was approved in 2025.  The Ministry of Public Health in Thailand opposed female genital mutilation and recognised it as a grave violation of human rights. Thailand was committed to eliminating this harmful practice in all its forms and was focused on providing education about its potential health consequences.  This effort was carried out in collaboration with community networks. 

    During the period 2021–2023, there were no violations found by labour inspectorates.  Thailand maintained proactive oversight through the labour inspectorate system.  Thailand aimed to conduct awareness raising among children and youth on trafficking and had developed youth focused education and training in this regard. 

    Thailand was aware that gender stereotypes were ingrained, and this would take a lifetime effort to overcome.  Currently, changing the mindset of the people was difficult.  It was important to raise awareness and re-learn what was appropriate. The Department of Women’s Affairs coordinated with academics to work with young people on a project to identify sexist language in textbooks in schools.  A guidebook had been created and distributed to teachers to provide guidance on how to combat harmful gender stereotypes in schools.  While gender stereotypes were the key focus currently, the States pledged to eventually address all kinds of stereotypes. 

    The country operated under the premise that sex work was not considered a crime and that sex workers should have access to appropriate justice avenues if required. 

    Questions by Committee Experts

    An Expert acknowledged the second female Prime Minister of Thailand, who was historically the youngest.  The Committee was concerned about the low levels of women’s representation in political institutions.  Cultural norms and stereotypes actively discouraged women from entering politics. What legislative measures were being taken to combat issues such as gender hate speech and harmful stereotypes which deterred women from participating in public life?  Were there plans to address workplace bullying in parliament?  What was the level of representation of Muslim women in politics? 

    Women appeared to be underrepresented in the Foreign Office, comprising just 15 per cent of ambassadors.  What steps were being taken by the State party to ensure this underrepresentation of women was rectified, including minorities such as women from the deep south and lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex women?  The Committee commended the Thai Government for increasing the protection of human rights defenders.  How many recommendations from the fourth and fifth national human rights plan targeting human rights defenders had been implemented? Were there plans to address the small number of female military personnel?  How was it ensured that civil society could participate in multilateral environments?

    A Committee Expert said Thailand had over half a million registered stateless persons in January 2022, many of whom were ethnic minorities in remote areas who were unaware of their rights.  Thailand had not ratified key United Nations Conventions on statelessness.  There were differences when it came to men and women obtaining Thai nationality.  Would the State plan to make amendments to the national act, providing equality on citizenship for men and women?  What measures had been taken to decrease the number of stateless women and children? How did the Government plan to support refugee women, including Rohingya women? 

    Responses by the Delegation 

    The delegation said female police officers could advance to the Commissioner rank through examinations.  Female police officers occupied the highest rank within the Thai police.  The representation of women in the Superintendent rank rose from 13 per cent in 2021 to 16.7 per cent in 2025. Approximately 66 per cent of Thai diplomats were women, and around 36 per cent of Thai ambassadors were women. Measures including maternity leave were put in place to ensure the support of female staff.  Women were encouraged to participate in multilateral fora. 

    For decades, the Thai Government had continually adopted policies and measures to improve the protection of stateless persons in the country.  Their access to public services had been increased.  In 2024, a cabinet solution was adopted to expedite the process to nationality acquisition to a large group of the population.  This would allow stateless children to obtain Thai nationality. 

    It was important to analyse data to determine how to counter the trend of violence against female political candidates. 

    Comprehensive health access was ensured for all migrants, including women.  The migrant health insurance scheme was a voluntarily contributory scheme utilised by migrant workers in the informal sector, prior to national health insurance enrolment.  Public health care was actively working to address the needs of unregistered migrants.  Although Thailand was not party to the 1951 Convention relating to the protection of refugees, the State had taken other steps to ensure their rights were upheld. For instance, a memorandum of understanding had been developed to ensure children and their mothers were placed in child protection centres, instead of being held in immigration centres. 

    Recent steps showed that 80 per cent of Thai women wished to start their own business, with 45 per cent of Thai women considering themselves to be entrepreneurs. 

    The delegation said within the fourth national human rights action plan (2019-2022), there were several recommendations for human rights defenders, including strengthening the protection act, studying best practices on the protection of freedom of assembly, and allocating more funding, among others.  The fifth national human rights action plan also contained three specific recommendations for human rights defenders, including acceding to the International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance, which came into effect in Thailand in 2024. 

    The Committee for the Promotion of Gender Equality was responsible for formulating policies, measures and operational plans to promote gender equality across all sectors. 

    Questions by a Committee Expert

    A Committee Expert said the Committee noted with satisfaction the adoption of the national education act of 1999 which guaranteed all children equal rights and opportunities to receive free and compulsory basic education.  The Committee encouraged the State party to continue efforts aimed at reaching gender parity in primary and secondary school enrolment.  Despite these efforts, the Committee was concerned about the high dropout rates among stateless and refugee girls and the fact that Patani Malay girls were discouraged from continuing their education due to early marriage and lack of education in Malay. 

    Were there policies specifically targeted for expanding education to minorities?  What steps were being taken to ensure the safety of girls living in the Southern Border Provinces?  How was cyber bullying against transgender students being addressed in schools and universities? 

    Thailand was commended for leading in science, technology, engineering and mathematics fields; how was it ensured these translated into employment opportunities for young women?  What steps was the State party taking to ensure age-appropriate sexual reproductive education in schools?

    Responses by the Delegation 

    The delegation said there were mechanisms in place to ensure girls from marginalised groups received education.  There were schools established in the Southern Border Provinces, with border patrol officers teaching the students.  Schools in rural areas faced disadvantages; however, there were no discriminatory practices for migrant girls to access schools.  The current school graduation rates showed a higher percentage of girls compared to boys.  The State provided safety in all areas to prevent threats to students.  A religious school, supported by the Government, was located in the Southern Border Provinces, providing additional opportunities for students. 

    Bullying stemmed from stereotypes, and the Ministry of Education was aware of this issue.  Work had been undertaken to combat bullying of transgender students, including launching a digital platform for reporting on school safety.  At risk students, including victims and perpetrators, were identified, and activities were conducted to encourage friendship and positive interaction. Support was strengthened for teachers to enable them to identify early warning signs and respond in a timely fashion. The development of science and technology projects had provided scholarships to students of all genders. Thailand was committed to providing age-appropriate sexual and reproductive education in schools.  The protest “One School One Hospital” encouraged hospitals to provide advice on sexual health and contraception directly to students. 

    Questions by a Committee Expert

    A Committee Expert said the gender pay gap remained at around 11 per cent in Thailand, and around 66 per cent of female workers in the agricultural sector earned below the minimum wage.  Had the equal pay act been adequately enforced?  What was being done to address noncompliance?  What measures were being taken to ensure women in the domestic sector and migrant workers were covered under social protection schemes? 

    How was the effective protection of pregnant women ensured, particularly in small businesses? Was there a plan to introduce mandated paternity leave?  What steps had been taken to ensure sexual harassment protections extended to all sectors? What mechanisms were in place to monitor sexual harassment?  Were there any plans to formalise the employment pathway for migrant workers? 

    Responses by the Delegation 

    The delegation said the labour protection act mandated that employers paid equal wages for equal work, regardless of a person’s gender.  Thailand was developing a draft act to facilitate the empowerment of informal workers.  Thailand provided compensation for women migrant workers, including paid maternity leave and protection against dismissal due to pregnancy.  Thailand had enacted legislation which prohibited sexual harassment in all workplaces.  Steps were being taken to bring informal migrant workers into the formal system. The State provided legal guidance on rights and duties under the law, including regarding labour disputes. 

    Questions by a Committee Expert

    A Committee Expert said according to the Criminal Court, abortion could be interrupted up to the twelfth week, but after this time period, a pregnant woman was required to have a consultation with a doctor, and faced a sanction and fine if she proceeded with an abortion.  Did the State plan to amend its Criminal Code to fully decriminalise abortion and abolish the need for consultations after the 12-week mark?  How was the State combatting the stigma of abortion by health staff?  The number of forced sterilisation and coercive abortions of persons with disabilities was concerning.  What was being done to end these damaging practices?  What mechanisms were put in place to ensure appropriate measures were taken in this area?  Would the State provide reparations to victims? 

    Women in the Southern Border Provinces faced further issues, including female genital mutilation and unsafe abortions, as well as mental health issues due to the violence they experienced.  How was the State addressing these issues?  What steps was it taking to combat female genital mutilation, ensuring Muslim women could access care appropriate to their religious beliefs? The Committee had heard that women living with HIV were subject to tests without their consent and were pressured to undergo sterilisation.  What steps were being taken to ensure these tests were carried out without coercive pressure?  What was being done to ensure full access to HIV therapy for the most vulnerable groups? How was the right to health guaranteed for women in the prison system? 

    Responses by the Delegation 

    The delegation said a woman could fully terminate her pregnancy under 12 weeks without criminal liability.  Between 12 and 20 weeks, abortion services were accessible following certified consultations with public health professionals and based on medical grounds. Medical personnel received specialised training to enhance their expertise in abortion care.  The current national reproductive health policy aimed to ensure equitable and inclusive births, including for persons with disabilities. 

    Any HIV treatment was provided based on consent, and testing without consent was considered a violation of a patient’s rights.  Sterilisation could only be performed with an individual’s free and informed consent. Women and others living with HIV were only treated if they gave their informed consent; there were no practices of forced testing, and any allegations of such cases were investigated. Thailand focused on improving standardised medical treatment for females who were incarcerated.  Screenings were carried out for cancers and other diseases. The Universal Health Coverage Scheme also covered the border areas, as did the mental health programme. 

    Questions by a Committee Expert

    A Committee Expert asked how the State party planned to reduce gender disparity in social security, particularly for refugees and migrants residing in camps?  Initiatives supporting women’s entrepreneurship were welcomed, including the Women’s Empowerment Fund.  However, women in rural communities faced issues in accessing services.  What policies were in place for ensuring equal access to financial services for women in all areas?  What measures were in place to promote disadvantaged women in sports and culture? 

    Responses by the Delegation

    The delegation said the Human Development Fund was available to provide opportunities for women to access funds for businesses and economic empowerment.  Currently, there were around 17 million female members of this Fund.  By 2024, 17-million-baht worth of loans had been provided to females across the country. Work needed to be done to provide larger loans to women. 

    Questions by a Committee Expert

    A Committee Expert asked what concrete steps the State party was taking to ensure the protection and empowerment of marginalised women and girls?  What was being done to effectively advance the rights of these women and girls?  How was the State party effectively implementing the international standards for the treatment of prisoners as provided for in the Nelson Mandela Rules and the Bangkok Rules?

    The Expert congratulated the State party on the steps being taken to revise the climate change master plan which focused on gender and social inclusive climate action, including climate finance, adaptation and mitigation, recognising that women and girls experienced disproportionately greater loss and damage from the impacts of climate change.  What concrete steps was the State party taking to ensure that climate financing, adaptation and mitigation strategies met the specific needs of women and girls? 

    What steps was the State party taking to ensure that the blue economy and agriculture were sustainable, inclusive, and resilient to climate change, to meet the specific needs of women and girls?  What measures was the State party taking to ensure the protection of all women and girls from the disproportionate impacts of air pollution?

    Responses by the Delegation

    The delegation said inmates in the prison system received three nutritious meals daily which respected local, cultural and religious practices, and drinking water was supplied in adequate quantities.  To address overcrowding concerns, the Department of Corrections could authorise inmates to be moved to alternative custody alternatives.  A committee had been established to manage this process.   

    A national adaptation plan on climate change had been developed, aligning with global adaptation goals.  The plan emphasised the importance of gender equality in planning, decision making and public participation.  Measures in the plan included enhancing early warning systems, developing adaptation guidelines for vulnerable farming communities, and gender-responsive budgets, among other measures.

    Questions by a Committee Expert

    A Committee Expert commended the State party for raising the minimum age of marriage to 18 years.  In addition, Thailand had become the first country in Southeast Asia to legalise same-sex marriage.  However, child marriage persisted in Thailand, particularly in lower income areas. Polygamy was prohibited under the Civil Code, but it was still practiced.  What enforcement mechanisms were in place to eradicate exceptions permitting marriage under the age of 18?  What progress was being envisaged in harmonising Islamic family and inheritance law? What was the body specifically assigned for this important task?  How was the State party addressing systemic barriers that Muslim women faced in accessing divorce?  What concrete steps were being taken to eradicate polygamous unions? 

    Responses by the Delegation

    The delegation said Islamic family law was currently provided to Muslim citizens in the Southern Border Provinces.  Government authorities had supported the application of the use of Islamic family law in line with human rights and standards.  The Administrative Centre of the Southern Border Provinces had disseminated a family law handbook on inheritance and other laws.  After divorce, women were required under the Civil Code to wait for a certain number of days before remarrying.  They could remarry earlier, if they could provide a certificate from a doctor which stated they were not pregnant.  Door to door outreach was conducted to screen populations at risk of air pollution, including pregnant women. 

    Closing Remarks

    RAMRUNG WORAWAT, Director-General of the Department of Women’s Affairs and Family Development, Ministry of Social Development and Human Security of Thailand, head of the delegation, said the discussion with the Committee had been very fruitful. The State would aim to take forward the Committee’s recommendations, with a will to transform them into concrete actions.  Thailand wished to maintain the dialogue with the Committee and advance this important agenda at the international level. 

    NAHLA HAIDAR, Committee Chair, thanked Thailand for the constructive dialogue which had provided further insight into the situation of women and girls in the country.

    ___________

    Produced by the United Nations Information Service in Geneva for use of the media; 
    not an official record. English and French versions of our releases are different as they are the product of two separate coverage teams that work independently.

     

    CEDAW25.014E

    MIL OSI United Nations News

  • MIL-OSI Canada: Climbing high for the North American Cup Series

    Source: Government of Canada regional news (2)

    MIL OSI Canada News

  • MIL-OSI Security: Update 297 – IAEA Director General Statement on Situation in Ukraine

    Source: International Atomic Energy Agency – IAEA

    The IAEA team based at Ukraine’s Zaporizhzhya Nuclear Power Plant (ZNPP) has been informed that challenges related to the availability of cooling water and off-site power will need to be fully resolved before any of its reactors can be restarted, Director General Rafael Mariano Grossi said today.

    Those pre-conditions for any future decision to take the ZNPP’s six reactors from their current cold shutdown status were communicated to the IAEA team during discussions with the plant and Rostekhnadzor, the Russian regulator which is this week conducting pre-licensing inspection activities at reactor units 1 and 2. The current operating licenses – issued by the Ukrainian State regulator, SNRIU, – are due to expire in December this year and in February 2026, respectively.

    Europe’s largest nuclear power plant (NPP) has not been generating electricity for almost three years now, and its location on the frontline of the conflict continues to put nuclear safety in constant jeopardy.

    Its off-site power situation also remains extremely fragile, with only one power line currently functioning compared with ten before the conflict. In addition, the destruction of the Kakhovka dam in mid-2023 means the ZNPP does not have sufficient water to cool six operating reactors.

    “Based on the discussions at the site this week, it is clear that there is a general consensus among all parties that the Zaporizhzhya Nuclear Power Plant cannot start operating again as long as this large-scale war continues to endanger nuclear safety at the site, which is what the IAEA has also been stating very clearly,” Director General Grossi said.

    During this week’s meeting, the Rostekhnadzor representative said a team of its inspectors are currently conducting a two-week pre-licensing inspection scheduled to end on Friday. The results of the inspection – together with documentation submitted by the ZNPP – will subsequently be evaluated by Rostekhnadzor.  

    Also this week, the IAEA team has been observing various maintenance activities at the site, including on parts of the safety system of reactor unit 5 and on the unit 4 main transformer – which commenced its planned maintenance period this week.

    The team was informed that a pump in one of the site’s 11 groundwater wells built after the destruction of the Kakhovka dam is currently not working and will be replaced. The ten remaining wells continue to supply the sufficient flow of water needed for the shutdown reactors.

    The IAEA team reported hearing explosions at various distances from the site on most days over the past week.

    At Ukraine’s other nuclear sites, the IAEA teams at the three operating NPPs – Khmelnytskyy, Rivne and the South Ukraine – and the Chornobyl site all reported hearing air raid alarms over the past week, with the IAEA team at the Khmelnytskyy NPP sheltering at the site yesterday.

    The IAEA team based at the Khmelnytskyy NPP observed a two-day emergency exercise to test the response to a site blackout.

    Over the past week, one of the three reactor units at the South Ukraine NPP completed its planned refuelling and maintenance outage and returned to full power generation, after which another unit was shut down for maintenance. The refuelling and maintenance outage of the third unit is still ongoing, as is the planned such outage of one Rivne NPP’s four reactors.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Security: Update on Developments in Iran

    Source: International Atomic Energy Agency – IAEA

    The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) is continuing to closely monitor and assess the situation regarding the Israeli attacks on nuclear sites in the Islamic Republic of Iran, providing frequent public updates about developments and their possible consequences for human health and the environment, Director General Rafael Mariano Grossi said today.

    Since the military attacks began almost a week ago, the IAEA has been reporting on damage at several of these facilities, including at nuclear-related sites located in Arak, Esfahan, Natanz and Tehran, and their potential radiological impact.

    In his statement to the Board of Governors on 13 June, the morning of the attacks on Iranian nuclear facilities, the Director General recalled the numerous General Conference resolutions on the topic of military attacks against nuclear facilities, in particular, GC(XXIX)/RES/444 and GC(XXXIV)/RES/533, which provide, inter alia, that “any armed attack on and threat against nuclear facilities devoted to peaceful purposes constitutes a violation of the principles of the United Nations Charter, international law and the Statute of the Agency”. 

    He also stated that, furthermore, the IAEA has consistently underlined that “armed attacks on nuclear facilities could result in radioactive releases with grave consequences within and beyond the boundaries of the State which has been attacked”, as was stated in GC(XXXIV)/RES/533.

    Later at the special session of the Board of Governors on 16 June 2025, in his statement, the Director General emphasized that, “For the second time in three years, we are witnessing a dramatic conflict between two IAEA Member States in which nuclear installations are coming under fire and nuclear safety is being compromised. The IAEA, just as has been the case with the military conflict between the Russian Federation and Ukraine, will not stand idly by during this conflict.”

    “The IAEA is monitoring the situation very carefully,” he said. “The IAEA is ready to respond to any nuclear or radiological emergency.”

    It was the Director General’s third comprehensive statement in four days about the situation in Iran, following the statement to the Board on 13 June and one to the United Nations Security Council later the same day. In addition, the Agency has provided regular updates on its official X account.

    IAEA inspectors remain present in Iran, ready to be deployed at nuclear sites when possible, even though the number of Agency staff has been reduced somewhat in light of the security situation, Director General Grossi said.

    He added: “The Agency is and will remain present in Iran. Safeguards inspections in Iran will continue as required by Iran’s safeguards obligations under its NPT (Non-Proliferation Treaty) Safeguards Agreement, as soon as safety and security conditions allow.”

    Calling for maximum restraint to avoid further escalation, Director General Grossi stressed that he was ready “to travel immediately and engage with all relevant parties to help ensure the protection of nuclear facilities and the continued peaceful use of nuclear technology in accordance with the Agency mandate, including by deploying Agency nuclear safety and security experts, in addition to our safeguards inspectors in Iran, wherever necessary.”

    “Military escalation threatens lives, increases the chance of a radiological release with serious consequences for people and the environment and delays indispensable work towards a diplomatic solution for the long-term assurance that Iran does not acquire a nuclear weapon,” he said.

    The IAEA stands ready to act within its statutory mandate to assist in preventing a nuclear accident that could result in grave radiological consequences, he said, adding: “For the IAEA to act, a constructive, professional dialogue will have to ensue, and this must happen sooner rather than later.”

    Based on information available to it, the IAEA has been reporting on the situation at the nuclear facilities and sites in Iran, including:

    The Natanz Fuel Enrichment Plant site was targeted in attacks on 13 June that destroyed the above-ground part of the Pilot Fuel Enrichment Plant, one of the facilities at which Iran was producing uranium enriched up to 60% U-235.

    Electricity infrastructure at the plant – including an electrical sub-station, a main electric power supply building, and emergency power supply and back-up generators – was also destroyed. The loss of power to the underground cascades may have damaged the centrifuges there, Director General Grossi told the Board on 16 June.

    Later this week, the IAEA issued an update, saying that based on continued analysis of high- resolution satellite imagery collected after the attacks on the nuclear site at Natanz, the Agency has identified additional elements that indicate direct impacts also on the underground enrichment halls at Natanz.

    There has been no radiological impact outside the Natanz site, but circumscribed radiological and chemical contamination inside the enrichment facility, Director General Grossi reported.

    “It was limited to this facility. There was no radiological impact externally,” he said.

    Considering the type of nuclear material at the Natanz facility, it is possible that uranium isotopes contained in uranium hexafluoride, uranyl fluoride and hydrogen fluoride are dispersed inside the facility, he said. The radiation, primarily consisting of alpha particles, poses a significant danger if uranium is inhaled or ingested. However, this risk can be effectively managed with appropriate protective measures, such as using respiratory protection devices while inside the affected facilities. The main concern inside the facility is the chemical toxicity of the uranium hexafluoride and the fluoride compounds generated in contact with water.

    At the Esfahan nuclear site, four buildings were damaged in Friday’s attack: the central chemical laboratory, a uranium conversion plant, the Tehran reactor fuel manufacturing plant, and the enriched uranium metal processing facility, which was under construction. As in Natanz, off-site radiation levels remain unchanged at the Esfahan nuclear site.

    On 18 June, the IAEA said in an update that it had information that two centrifuge production facilities in Iran – the TESA Karaj workshop and the Tehran Research Center – were hit. Both locations were previously under IAEA monitoring and verification under the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA).

    At the Tehran Research Center, one building was hit where advanced centrifuge rotors were manufactured and tested. At the Karaj workshop, two buildings were destroyed where different centrifuge components were manufactured.

    The Khondab Heavy Water Research Reactor, under construction, was hit on 19 June. As the reactor was not operational and did not contain any nuclear material, Director General Grossi said no radiological consequence was expected. While damage to the nearby Heavy Water Production Plant was initially not visible, it is now assessed that key buildings at the facility were damaged, including the distillation unit.

    At present, no damage has been observed at Iran’s other nuclear sites.

    While there so far has been no major radiological incident as a result of the attacks, Director General Grossi stressed the possible nuclear safety and security risks.

    “There is a lot of nuclear material in Iran in different places, which means that the potential for a radiological accident with the dispersion in the atmosphere of radioactive materials and particles does exist,” he said.

    Director General Grossi also emphasized the importance of cooperating and exchanging information with the Iranian authorities.

    “Amid theses challenging and complex circumstances, it is crucial that the IAEA receives timely and regular technical information about the nuclear facilities and their respective sites. This information is needed to promptly inform the international community and ensure an effective response and assistance to any emergency situation in Iran,” he said, adding that he was also in constant contact with other countries in the region.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: President Trump’s Iran statements ‘a deadly game of brinkmanship’, Lord Robertson tells London Conference

    Source: Chatham House –

    President Trump’s Iran statements ‘a deadly game of brinkmanship’, Lord Robertson tells London Conference
    News release
    jon.wallace

    Fading trust in international rules-based order was a common point of discussion at annual conference with the theme ‘Rewriting the rules of the world’.

    The Israel–Iran war and its implications for US foreign policy dominated Chatham House’s London Conference, the annual event that brings together policymakers, businesspeople, and experts on international affairs. Shifting global allegiances and power dynamics informed many of the discussions at the day-long gathering at the St. Pancras London, Autograph Collection hotel. 

    The two keynote speakers brought different perspectives on the Israel–Iran war. In the opening session former NATO Secretary General Lord Robertson told Chatham House Director Bronwen Maddox:

    Lord Robertson speaks at the London Conference.

    ‘One feature will be the…US president’s decision and we await to see what that’s going to be. And that will shift the places on the chess board quite dramatically, irrespective of the way it goes. 

    ‘And it would appear at the moment that he is involved in a deadly game of brinkmanship, using the same skills that he had as a property developer. But this is not, you know, the plan for a condominium in the centre of New York, you know, this is the future stability of the world.’

    Later, former MI6 chief Sir John Sawers said he believed that that US should bomb Iran’s deep nuclear sites, such as Fordow, that Israel could not reach, but that President Trump should not seek regime change.

    ‘I think the Americans should frankly get on with it and get it over with. A, it reduces the chance of the Iranians shipping out more and more kit from Fordow and other sites into places where they can store it safely, and they will certainly have those options, I think. 

    Revised flag policy

    Delegate Melanie Cormier, representing the DPCSB’s Indigenous Education Network, shared a statement relaying that the board’s restrictive flag policy fails to acknowledge the Mississaugas of the Credit First Nation whose traditional and treaty territory where the board resides. She states: “Your flag policy is in violation of our jurisdiction. To say that any of our flags can not be flown in our own territories is unacceptable.”

    Brea Corbet, the only trustee with voting power who did not vote to restrict the Pride flag, told an earlier bylaw policies meeting: “When we remove rainbow flags and heritage flags, we are not protecting our Catholic identity; we are revealing institutional fragility. The Pride flag does not threaten Catholic education, policies of exclusion do.”

    Three student trustees also opposed the restrictive policy, but their votes unfortunately aren’t counted. We argue this too speaks to the suppression of student voice within the board.

    This fragility disproportionately threatens the safety of Indigenous, 2SLGBTQI+ and marginalized students and staff as they are overlooked and dismissed by the flag policy.




    Read more:
    New Brunswick’s LGBTQ+ safe schools debate makes false opponents of parents and teachers


    Nurturing all students

    Kanienʼkehá:ka (Mohawk) education professor Frank Deer speaks of educational programming “that is congruent with the identity of the local community.” This programming, he writes, must go beyond curricula to address the school environment as well. Student safety, inclusion and identity affirmation must be prioritized in all aspects of school life.

    Jennifer Brant, a Kanienʼkehà:ka interdisciplinary scholar, speaks in depth about how silence during times like these equates to complicity in accepting injustices that are taking place within “the communities in which we live, the broader society and global communities.”

    Inaction in response to this policy is negligent.

    Detrimental ramifications may also extend to reconciliation efforts in religious spaces more generally. This regressive policy poses lingering questions about the longevity of Catholic schools if they fail to protect and nurture all students.

    Impacts on reconciliation

    The primary target of the DPCDSB’s sweeping flag policy is the 2SLGBTQI+ community. In addition, the flag ban attacks Indigenous sovereignty and Anishinaabek nationhood, perpetuating attitudes tied to the Doctrine of Discovery still present in the Catholic ethos.




    Read more:
    The Vatican just renounced a 500-year-old doctrine that justified colonial land theft … Now what? — Podcast


    Flying the flags of First Nations (at their request) is not only a matter of inclusion, it is a matter of respect — respect for the land, the people and the treaties that connect us.

    In denying this step towards relationality, this governing body of a Catholic school board sets back the Church’s reconciliation efforts riding on the momentum of the papal visit.




    Read more:
    Pope Francis showed in deeds and words he wanted to face the truth in Canada


    The board’s ignorance of how this policy risks damaging relationships with students, families and staff at the board, as well as the broader public, partly reflects an indifference that Pope Francis warned Catholics about during his visit:

    “I trust and pray that Christians and civil society in this land may grow in the ability to accept and respect the identity and the experience of the Indigenous Peoples. It is my hope that concrete ways can be found to make those peoples better known and esteemed, so that all may learn to walk together.”

    Walking together in solidarity

    As we write this piece, we can see through the window a local Toronto Catholic Distric School Board elementary school, where an Every Child Matters flag is flown alongside a Pride and Canadian flag.

    Catholic education, despite its sordid history and contested perspectives about interpreting and practising Church doctrine, can be a tool to drive reconciliation.

    Catholics cannot let a narrow vision overshadow Pope Francis’s pilgrimage and the global Church movement he, the Church’s bishops and Catholic lay people have participated in — via a global synod — to respond to the call to walk together in solidarity with Indigenous, 2SLGBTQI+ and other marginalized people.

    Counter-narratives of hope and possibility

    We wish to continue to hear counter-narratives of hope and possibility for Catholic education. We wish to see active changes that move the DPCDSB, as scholar Sheila Cote-Meek of the Teme-Augama Anishinabai, writes, “to a drastically different way of being, doing and working.”

    As other Catholic boards in Ontario initiate flag debates of their own, we are left with the lingering question. What is the future of Catholic education if it’s not intended to support the physical, emotional, mental and spiritual well-being of all those entrusted to its care?

    The authors do not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and have disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. Catholic school board’s regressive flag policy sets back reconciliation in a post-Papal visit Canada – https://theconversation.com/catholic-school-boards-regressive-flag-policy-sets-back-reconciliation-in-a-post-papal-visit-canada-256765

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI Global: Catholic school board’s regressive flag policy sets back reconciliation in a post-Papal visit Canada

    Source: The Conversation – Canada – By Erenna Morrison, PhD Candidate, Curriculum and Pedagogy, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto

    Following the release of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission’s 94 Calls to Action in 2015, some Catholic school boards have made commitments to reconciliation in education. These boards include the Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board (DPCDSB).

    However, the DPCDSB — located in the Greater Toronto area — has also introduced a flag policy that raises serious questions about a commitment to the wider progress being made in welcoming all students and promoting reconciliation.

    On Jan. 28, 2025 — following advocacy in different parts of Ontario and the country against the presence of the Pride flag — the board’s trustees voted in nine to one to add more restrictions to its flag policies. These restrictions stipulated that only flags representing Canada, the provinces, territories and the school board can be be displayed inside schools or other DPCDSB facilities.

    Acts of erasure

    The developments in Peel Region follow earlier policy changes to restrict the presence of the Pride flag and other flags at schools.

    Advocates from the board defending flag restrictions have said that in Catholic schools, the icon of the cross is the only symbol that should be promoted and that this represents inclusion and acceptance of all.

    However, members of the 2SLGBTQI+ community and opponents of restrictive flag policies argue that the Pride flag is needed to signal a welcoming environment. They say its removal is an act of erasure and that it calls into question how the board affirms the rights, dignity and visibility of 2SLGBTQI+ people and how it fosters their safety. The board says, and believes, its practices and policies comply with the Ontario human rights code, adding that supports are available for students who identify as 2SLGBTQI.

    The erasure of the Pride flag has the simultaneous effect of banning other important flags, such as Every Child Matters flags, Indigenous Nation flags and MMIWG2S flags (drawing attention to ending violence, disappearance and murder of First Nations women, girls and two-spirit people).

    In our analysis, this restrictive flag policy expresses colonial violence. We rely on the work of Sandra Styres, researcher of Iethi’nihsténha Ohwentsia’kékha (Land), Resurgence, Reconciliation and the Politics of Education, who examines how colonial violence is expressed in academic settings through “micro-aggressions, purposeful ignorance, structural racism, lateral violence, isolation” and also in “representations and spaces.”

    Crucial time for righting relationships

    Our concern is informed by our combined research and personal engagement focused around reconciliatory education in elementary Catholic schools (Erenna) and Anishinaabe Catholic expressions of self-determination in the Church (Noah). Erenna is a settler and Noah is a member of Michipicoten First Nation.

    We are married writing partners who travelled to Québec City in July 2022 to witness the long-awaited penitential pilgrimage of the late Pope Francis. We left with an awareness that this is a critical time for the righting of relationships that have been severely fractured by a Church complicit in genocide.

    The DPCDSB flag policy speaks to an unwillingness of many to sever emotional attachments to the white imperialism that preserves a western way of thinking, doing and being, in the name of faith.

    When a major Catholic entity like the DPCDSB introduces policies that may cause harm, concerned people, regardless of creed, must pay attention to such injustices.

    Revised flag policy

    Delegate Melanie Cormier, representing the DPCSB’s Indigenous Education Network, shared a statement relaying that the board’s restrictive flag policy fails to acknowledge the Mississaugas of the Credit First Nation whose traditional and treaty territory where the board resides. She states: “Your flag policy is in violation of our jurisdiction. To say that any of our flags can not be flown in our own territories is unacceptable.”

    Brea Corbet, the only trustee with voting power who did not vote to restrict the Pride flag, told an earlier bylaw policies meeting: “When we remove rainbow flags and heritage flags, we are not protecting our Catholic identity; we are revealing institutional fragility. The Pride flag does not threaten Catholic education, policies of exclusion do.”

    Three student trustees also opposed the restrictive policy, but their votes unfortunately aren’t counted. We argue this too speaks to the suppression of student voice within the board.

    This fragility disproportionately threatens the safety of Indigenous, 2SLGBTQI+ and marginalized students and staff as they are overlooked and dismissed by the flag policy.




    Read more:
    New Brunswick’s LGBTQ+ safe schools debate makes false opponents of parents and teachers


    Nurturing all students

    Kanienʼkehá:ka (Mohawk) education professor Frank Deer speaks of educational programming “that is congruent with the identity of the local community.” This programming, he writes, must go beyond curricula to address the school environment as well. Student safety, inclusion and identity affirmation must be prioritized in all aspects of school life.

    Jennifer Brant, a Kanienʼkehà:ka interdisciplinary scholar, speaks in depth about how silence during times like these equates to complicity in accepting injustices that are taking place within “the communities in which we live, the broader society and global communities.”

    Inaction in response to this policy is negligent.

    Detrimental ramifications may also extend to reconciliation efforts in religious spaces more generally. This regressive policy poses lingering questions about the longevity of Catholic schools if they fail to protect and nurture all students.

    Impacts on reconciliation

    The primary target of the DPCDSB’s sweeping flag policy is the 2SLGBTQI+ community. In addition, the flag ban attacks Indigenous sovereignty and Anishinaabek nationhood, perpetuating attitudes tied to the Doctrine of Discovery still present in the Catholic ethos.




    Read more:
    The Vatican just renounced a 500-year-old doctrine that justified colonial land theft … Now what? — Podcast


    Flying the flags of First Nations (at their request) is not only a matter of inclusion, it is a matter of respect — respect for the land, the people and the treaties that connect us.

    In denying this step towards relationality, this governing body of a Catholic school board sets back the Church’s reconciliation efforts riding on the momentum of the papal visit.




    Read more:
    Pope Francis showed in deeds and words he wanted to face the truth in Canada


    The board’s ignorance of how this policy risks damaging relationships with students, families and staff at the board, as well as the broader public, partly reflects an indifference that Pope Francis warned Catholics about during his visit:

    “I trust and pray that Christians and civil society in this land may grow in the ability to accept and respect the identity and the experience of the Indigenous Peoples. It is my hope that concrete ways can be found to make those peoples better known and esteemed, so that all may learn to walk together.”

    Walking together in solidarity

    As we write this piece, we can see through the window a local Toronto Catholic Distric School Board elementary school, where an Every Child Matters flag is flown alongside a Pride and Canadian flag.

    Catholic education, despite its sordid history and contested perspectives about interpreting and practising Church doctrine, can be a tool to drive reconciliation.

    Catholics cannot let a narrow vision overshadow Pope Francis’s pilgrimage and the global Church movement he, the Church’s bishops and Catholic lay people have participated in — via a global synod — to respond to the call to walk together in solidarity with Indigenous, 2SLGBTQI+ and other marginalized people.

    Counter-narratives of hope and possibility

    We wish to continue to hear counter-narratives of hope and possibility for Catholic education. We wish to see active changes that move the DPCDSB, as scholar Sheila Cote-Meek of the Teme-Augama Anishinabai, writes, “to a drastically different way of being, doing and working.”

    As other Catholic boards in Ontario initiate flag debates of their own, we are left with the lingering question. What is the future of Catholic education if it’s not intended to support the physical, emotional, mental and spiritual well-being of all those entrusted to its care?

    The authors do not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and have disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. Catholic school board’s regressive flag policy sets back reconciliation in a post-Papal visit Canada – https://theconversation.com/catholic-school-boards-regressive-flag-policy-sets-back-reconciliation-in-a-post-papal-visit-canada-256765

    MIL OSI – Global Reports