NewzIntel.com

    • Checkout Page
    • Contact Us
    • Default Redirect Page
    • Frontpage
    • Home-2
    • Home-3
    • Lost Password
    • Member Login
    • Member LogOut
    • Member TOS Page
    • My Account
    • NewzIntel Alert Control-Panel
    • NewzIntel Latest Reports
    • Post Views Counter
    • Privacy Policy
    • Public Individual Page
    • Register
    • Subscription Plan
    • Thank You Page

Category: Energy

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Gazprom Transgaz Saint Petersburg Continues Cooperation with Polytech

    Translartion. Region: Russians Fedetion –

    Source: Peter the Great St Petersburg Polytechnic University – Peter the Great St Petersburg Polytechnic University –

    On February 12, Georgy Fokin, CEO of Gazprom Transgaz Saint Petersburg, and Andrey Rudskoy, Rector of Peter the Great Saint Petersburg Polytechnic University (SPbPU), signed a new version of the cooperation agreement.

    At the meeting held at the university, prospects for further cooperation were discussed. One of the important achievements is the creation in 2014 of the basic department of the company “Gas Turbine Units for Gas Pumping Stations” as part of the Institute of Energy and Transport Systems of SPbPU, where joint scientific research is carried out in priority areas of science and technology applicable to the gas industry and the fuel and energy complex. Training is conducted according to bachelor’s and master’s degree programs.

    Since 2012, Gazprom Transgaz Saint Petersburg LLC and Peter the Great Saint Petersburg Polytechnic University have had a cooperation agreement in the area of developing joint educational, scientific and research activities.

    According to the terms of the agreement, university students undergo industrial and pre-graduation practice at the enterprise’s facilities, take part in conferences for young workers and research projects, and participate in a competition to receive the Society’s Personal Scholarship. The most promising of them receive the opportunity for employment and professional development at Gazprom Transgaz Saint Petersburg.

    Gazprom Transgaz Saint Petersburg LLC is a 100% subsidiary of Gazprom PJSC. The company transports gas to Saint Petersburg, Leningrad, Novgorod, Pskov, Kaliningrad, Tver, Smolensk, Bryansk regions, the Republic of Karelia, and the Republic of Belarus.

    The company operates over 12 thousand kilometers of gas pipelines. The enterprise’s area of responsibility includes 34 compressor shops with 206 gas pumping units, 251 gas distribution stations, heat, power and water supply facilities, communications, metrology and automation. The company has 18 branches, including 14 linear production departments of main gas pipelines.

    The company’s staff numbers over 7,000 people. The head office is located in St. Petersburg.

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    MIL OSI Russia News –

    February 13, 2025
  • MIL-OSI China: OPEC maintains oil demand forecasts for 2025, 2026

    Source: China State Council Information Office 3

    Photo taken on Nov. 30, 2023 shows the headquarters of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) in Vienna, Austria. [Photo/Xinhua]

    The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) announced on Wednesday that it is maintaining its previous forecasts for global oil demand growth in 2025 and 2026.

    In its February monthly oil market report, OPEC projects a “healthy” increase in global oil demand, estimating growth of 1.45 million barrels per day (bpd) in 2025, followed by a rise of 1.43 million bpd in 2026, figures unchanged from last month’s assessment.

    “Growth this year is expected to be driven by transportation fuels on the back of strong air travel demand and healthy road mobility. Support is also expected to come from the industrial, construction and agricultural sectors in non-OECD (the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development) countries,” OPEC said.

    The organization also left its global economic growth projections for 2025 and 2026 unchanged, forecasting a 3.1 percent expansion this year and 3.2 percent in the following year.

    MIL OSI China News –

    February 13, 2025
  • MIL-OSI China: US stocks close mixed after hot inflation data

    Source: China State Council Information Office

    U.S. stocks ended mixed on Wednesday, as the unexpected rise in inflation led to speculation that the Federal Reserve may delay interest rate cuts to manage the economy’s overheating.

    The Dow Jones Industrial Average declined by 225.09 points, or 0.50 percent, ending at 44,368.56. The S&P 500 decreased by 16.53 points, or 0.27 percent, to close at 6,051.97. In contrast, the Nasdaq Composite Index edged up by 6.09 points, or 0.03 percent, finishing at 19,649.95.

    Within the S&P 500’s 11 primary sectors, nine closed in negative territory. Energy and real estate sectors led the declines, losing 2.69 percent and 0.91 percent, respectively. Conversely, consumer staples and communication services sectors posted gains, rising 0.23 percent and 0.04 percent, respectively.

    The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported Wednesday that the consumer price index (CPI), a comprehensive measure of the costs of goods and services across the U.S. economy, accelerated by 0.5 percent on a seasonally adjusted basis for the month, pushing the annual inflation rate to 3 percent. This outcome surpassed the estimates, which had predicted a 0.3 percent monthly increase and a 2.9 percent annual rate, with the annual rate rising by 0.1 percentage point compared to December.

    Excluding volatile food and energy prices, the CPI advanced by 0.4 percent for the month, resulting in a 12-month inflation rate of 3.3 percent — again beating the respective forecasts of 0.3 percent and 3.1 percent — and the annual core rate was up by 0.1 percentage point from December.

    “Shelter costs continue to be the main driver of core inflation as higher mortgage rates push more Americans into a rental market in which vacancy rates are near record lows,” said Erik Norland, chief economist at CME Group. “Traders appear to believe that today’s data make additional Fed cuts less likely than they had expected previously.”

    “The ‘wait and see’ Fed is going to be waiting longer than anticipated after a red-hot January CPI inflation report,” wrote Josh Jamner, investment strategy analyst at ClearBridge Investments. “This report puts the final nail in the coffin for the rate cut cycle, which we believe is over.”

    Market expectations have shifted, with traders now pricing the next rate cut to occur no earlier than September, even as Fed Chair Jerome Powell cautioned against reading too much into the latest CPI report. “We don’t get excited about one or two good readings and we don’t get excited about one or two bad readings,” Powell said in testimony before the House Financial Services Committee.

    Powell reiterated Wednesday that while the Fed has made “great progress” in bringing inflation closer to its 2 percent target, it is “not quite there yet.” He emphasized the need to keep monetary policy restrictive for now.

    Meanwhile, a new round of earnings has provided insight into the resilience of Corporate America. Kraft Heinz shares slipped after the company’s 2025 profit outlook fell short of expectations, whereas CVS Health enjoyed a boost as its quarterly profit drop was smaller than anticipated.

    In after-hours trading, Reddit’s upcoming results are drawing significant attention amid lofty Wall Street expectations, and Robinhood’s report is also in the spotlight following a three-year high in its stock price.

    MIL OSI China News –

    February 13, 2025
  • MIL-OSI China: CATL aiming to raise over $5B from HK listing

    Source: China State Council Information Office

    Contemporary Amperex Technology Co Ltd, the world’s largest electric vehicle battery maker, has filed for a Hong Kong listing that is expected to be the city’s biggest initial public offering in four years.

    The long-awaited CATL listing aims to raise more than $5 billion, which the company said will fund overseas production capacity and international business expansion, supporting its long-term global strategy.

    Already an A-share listed company, CATL’s Hong Kong listing will attract more international capital, further diversifying its financing channels, said analysts.

    According to public disclosures, as of June 2024, CATL had foreign currency balances of $6.74 billion and 3.86 billion euros ($4 billion), which were challenging to cover the hefty investments in Europe and other regions, as well as the ongoing need for overseas strategic expansion that often amount to billions of euros.

    Zhou Mi, a senior researcher at the Chinese Academy of International Trade and Economic Cooperation, said CATL’s Hong Kong listing is poised to assist the company in garnering funds on a global scale to support its endeavors in overseas research and development, production capacity expansion and market outreach. Additionally, the Hong Kong listing is expected to enhance CATL’s brand influence in international markets, strengthening its global competitiveness.

    “This listing opens avenues for financing. Given CATL’s expansive global reach, substantial financial support is imperative, a need that can be met through a successful IPO. In addition, CATL’s global expansion necessitates collaboration from diverse stakeholders. By opting for a Hong Kong listing, CATL can also engage with a broad spectrum of international investors. This move is pivotal in enhancing CATL’s global standing,” Zhou said.

    In recent years, CATL has accelerated its overseas expansion efforts, establishing battery factories in European countries including Germany and Hungary. In December, CATL signed a joint venture agreement with Dutch automotive group Stellantis that will build a large-scale lithium iron phosphate battery plant in Zaragoza, Spain.

    According to SNE Research — a South Korean company providing global market research and consulting services for rechargeable battery industries — CATL maintained its top position globally in terms of battery usage for electric vehicles from January to November 2024, witnessing a 28.6 percent year-on-year growth. Following CATL are BYD and LG Energy Solution.

    Many major Chinese original equipment manufacturers such as Zeekr, Aito and Li Auto, operating in the world’s largest EV market of China, have integrated CATL’s batteries into their products.

    Furthermore, prominent global OEMs including Tesla, BMW, Mercedes-Benz and Volkswagen have also chosen CATL’s batteries for their EV models.

    MIL OSI China News –

    February 13, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: The National Credit Guarantee Mechanism Invigorates Offshore Wind Power Financing Mechanisms and Strengthens Market

    Source: Republic Of China Taiwan 2

    According to Ministry of Economic Affairs (MOEA), domestic enterprises have a large and competitive demand for green electricity (such as RE100) to enhance international competitiveness, and advanced manufacturing processes require higher proportions of green electricity. Thus, increasing the share of green electricity in products made in Taiwan by 2030 has become an urgent priority. The National Credit Guarantee Mechanism aims to encourage investments from banks and insurance funds to support offshore wind farms and accelerate offshore wind power construction, thus ensuring sufficient green electricity for domestic high-tech industry to enhance export competitiveness and achieve the 2050 net-zero target.

    Amid public skepticism over the National Credit Guarantee Mechanism, the Energy Administration (EA) of the MOEA explained that the development of offshore wind power has progressed to the Zonal Development phase, with an estimated financing demand of NT$1.08 trillion between 2026 and 2031. The National Development Council (NDC), the Ministry of Finance, and the MOEA have jointly launched initiatives involving the National Development Fund and eight major state-owned banks to provide financing guarantees, with a total capacity of NT$90 billion. This mechanism assists offshore wind farms in obtaining financing and also offers guarantees to eliminate barriers for general enterprises seeking to purchase green electricity. The government remains committed to fostering a benign investment environment for offshore wind power development.

    The EA further stated that the MOEA and the NDC have recently collaborated to raise the national credit guarantee ratio from 60% to 80% for green energy construction projects by project financing developers, enhancing the full credit guarantees for banks to participate in wind farm projects, incentivizing state-owned banks and other financial institutions to finance offshore wind farms, and supports the sustainable development of offshore wind power market in Taiwan.

    Furthermore, the EA noted that offshore wind power financing operations require the long-term and stable financial capacity for electricity procurement. Therefore, the National Credit Guarantee Mechanism can provide any single general business up to 80% of credit guarantees for procurement of green electricity, which provides additional credit protection for domestic electricity-purchasing enterprises without long-term international credit ratings, and, at the same time, boosts the banks’ confidence when reviewing Corporate Power Purchase Agreements (CPPA), improving the financial structure of wind farms.

    Spokesperson for Energy Administration, Ministry of Economic Affairs:
    Deputy Director General, Chun-Li Lee
    Phone: 02-2775-7700, 0936-250-838
    Email: chunlee@moeaea.gov.tw

    Business Contact: Director, Chung-Hsien Chen
    Phone: 02-2775-7770, 0919-998-339
    Email: ctchen2@moeaea.gov.tw

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News –

    February 13, 2025
  • MIL-OSI China: China leads in energy transition investment

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    China led the world in energy transition investment last year, accounting for two-thirds of the $2.1 trillion spent globally in 2024, according to BloombergNEF (BNEF), a research and advisory firm.

    Driven by strong domestic demand, China remained the dominant force in clean energy investment last year, with spending focused on solar power, lithium batteries, electric vehicles, and power grids, BNEF said in its recently released Energy Transition Investment Trends 2025 report.

    With a 20 percent year-on-year growth, the Chinese mainland alone contributed $134 billion of the $202 billion global investment increase in 2024. The country posted solid growth across multiple sectors, including renewables, energy storage, nuclear power, EVs, hydrogen, heat pumps and power grids, it said.

    China’s rapid investment surge widened its lead over other economies, with its energy transition spending more than double that of any other country. Even when adjusted for economic size, China’s investment accounted for 4.5 percent of its GDP, far exceeding countries like the United States with 1.2 percent, said the research firm.

    China’s renewable energy sector experienced a stellar year in 2024, with the total installed capacity of wind and solar power surpassing 1.4 billion kilowatts, further reinforcing the country’s role as a global leader in renewable energy development.

    Industry experts said China has always been a global leader in the green energy shift.

    The Sinopec Economics and Development Research Institute, a think tank that is part of China Petroleum and Chemical Corp, has forecast that China’s investment in its energy transition is expected to surpass $1 trillion by 2030, with a focus on enhancing energy efficiency and accelerating electrification.

    China has doubled the share of renewable energy in its energy investment mix, spending more than 40 percent of its energy transition funds on renewables, or roughly twice the amount allocated to fossil fuels, said Luo Daqing, vice-president of the institute.

    According to Zhou Libo, deputy secretary-general of the China Electricity Council’s electric transportation and energy storage branch, investment in China is set to continue growing in integrated energy stations, photovoltaic-storage-charging hubs and supercharging stations.

    Data released by BNEF reveal that China also maintained its dominance in the clean energy supply chain, accounting for 81 percent of global supply chain investment in 2024.

    BNEF expects China to continue leading global clean energy spending in the years ahead.

    Beyond renewables, investment in other low-carbon energy sources, including nuclear power, rose sharply in 2024, underscoring a global revival of nuclear energy, it said.

    MIL OSI China News –

    February 13, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Australia: Green light for Lake Victoria Wind Farm

    Source: New South Wales Premiere

    Published: 13 February 2025

    Released by: Minister for Lands and Property


    The Minns Labor Government and wind farm developer WestWind Energy Pty Ltd have signed a lease agreement to help facilitate a wind farm with up to 201 turbines on Crown land in south-west NSW. 

    WestWind Energy is aiming to construct the wind farm over a 2-3 year period from 2029 to 2032, subject to planning approvals and community consultation.  

    The project has an estimated capital expenditure of $3.8 billion and will have an installed capacity of up to about 1,000 megawatts with an annual energy production of approximately 3,400 gigawatt-hours, capable of powering up to 700,000 homes.

    The project will also include up to three battery energy storage systems with a total of 1500 megawatt hours storage to provide a more secure and consistent supply of electricity.

    The proposed Lake Victoria Wind Farm, could support up to 375 jobs during construction and up to 70 ongoing jobs once completed to maintain the infrastructure and manage ongoing operations of the facility. 

    Crown Lands has negotiated the agreement for a special purpose lease which would provide WestWind Energy with an initial 25-year lease with two 7-year options to extend the lease a further 14 years.

    The lease agreement allows WestWind Energy to progress planning for its proposed Lake Victoria Wind Farm, would be located about 30 kilometres north-west of Wentworth near the Victorian border. 

    The project is listed on the NSW Planning website to be assessed as a State Significant Development once a development application is lodged.  

    Minister for Lands and Property Steve Kamper said:

    “The Lake Victoria Wind Farm proposal has the potential to deliver major economic investment, well paid regional jobs and more green energy for NSW.

    “The Lake Victoria Wind Farm is a significant clean energy initiative that can play a vital role in powering our economy for generations to come.

    “The rental income will be reinvested into the Crown Reserves Improvement Fund to provide grants to maintain and improve Crown reserves across the state, such as regional showgrounds, war memorials and community sporting grounds.” 

    MIL OSI News –

    February 13, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Sen. Markey, Rep. Beyer Highlight Concerns Over DOGE Access to Nuclear Security Information

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Massachusetts Ed Markey

    Letter Text (PDF)  

    Washington (February 12, 2025) – Senator Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.) and Representative Don Beyer (VA-08), Senate and House members of the congressional Nuclear Weapons and Arms Control Working Group, wrote to Department of Energy (DOE) Secretary Chris Wright regarding their concerns that Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) has been granted access to DOE, which oversees the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) and the nation’s most sensitive nuclear weapons secrets.

    In the letter the lawmakers wrote, “According to media reports, a 23-year-old former SpaceX intern, who does not have the appropriate security clearances needed to access DOE’s IT system, received access over the objections of members of its general counsel and chief information officers. This incursion into some of the nation’s most sensitive files is the latest in a series of Trump administration moves to plant unqualified Musk and DOGE staffers throughout the federal government, some of whom have records of leaking sensitive information and potentially wreaking havoc with vital information systems.”

    The lawmakers continued, “We are deeply concerned by this disregard of DOE security protocols and the potential impacts on our nuclear security.”

    The lawmakers request that the DOE answer the following questions by February 14, 2025:

    • What is the process for granting, reviewing, and revoking security clearances for DOGE staffers at DOE?
    • Have any DOGE staffers been given access to NNSA classified nuclear weapons information, specifically Restricted Data, Formerly Restricted Data, or Critical Nuclear Weapon Design Information? If so, please provide the names of DOGE staffers, their security clearance levels, the dates their clearances were granted, and the programs or types of data these staffers accessed.
    • Under what authority and justification was each instance of classified access granted to DOGE staffers? 
    • Are DOGE staffers required to undergo training on the handling of classified information?
    • What security measures are in place to ensure DOGE staffers do not improperly access or inappropriately share sensitive nuclear secrets?
    • Have any DOGE staffers with access to classified information had significant outside financial interests, foreign contacts, or other affiliations that could pose security concerns?
    • Are NNSA employees included in the Administration’s buy-out offer for federal employees? If so, and if senior NNSA employees leave the organization, how do you plan to maintain security and secrecy of nuclear weapons and related information?

    MIL OSI USA News –

    February 13, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Chairman Capito Questions CCUS Leaders on USE IT Act Implementation, CCUS Project Permitting

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for West Virginia Shelley Moore Capito

    [embedded content]

    To watch Chairman Capito’s questions, click here or the image above.

    WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, U.S. Senator Shelley Moore Capito (R-W.Va.), Chairman of the Senate Environment and Public Works (EPW) Committee, led a hearing on advancing carbon capture, utilization, and sequestration (CCUS) technologies, and examining the implementation of the Utilizing Significant Emissions with Innovative Technologies Act or USE IT Act.

    During the hearing, Chairman Capito questioned Kevin Connors, Assistant Director for Regulatory Compliance and Energy Policy at the Energy and Environmental Research Center; Dan Yates, Executive Director of the Ground Water Protection Council; and Jack Andreasen Cavanaugh, Manager of Carbon Management, U.S. Policy and Advocacy at Breakthrough Energy. In her questions, Chairman Capito asked about the pace of USE IT Act implementation, how to improve the permitting process for CCUS projects, and the importance of bipartisanship in these efforts. 

    HIGHLIGHTS:

    USE IT ACT TASK FORCES: “The USE IT Act was signed in 2020. I also alluded to the two CCUS Permitting Task Forces that have been established, one for federal lands, and one for non-federal lands. I’m interested to know…now that these Task Forces have been chartered and are operating, do you believe that will make an impact on identifying opportunities to improve the permitting, through these Task Forces, as the law requires?”

    NEED FOR RELIABLE ENERGY: “We have a repeating theme here, and I mentioned it in my in my opening statement of the reliabilities, because not only is this an intensive process, the process we see on AI and other things are putting great pressures on our potential for providing electricity for all of this.”

    PERMITTING IS KEY: “The key to all of this, and it’s not the only key, but it’s the key to every one of these projects, is a permitting process that you can move along. You can’t permit a nuclear plant, you can’t permit a pipeline, you can’t permit a transmission line. You’re sort of, at every point of the project, all hands point to permitting, and so any help that you can give us with permitting, Class VI, and those pipelines, I think, will cross benefit all projects.”

    IMPORTANCE OF BIPARTISANSHIP FOR PERMITTING AND CCUS: “As Senator Whitehouse said, this is going to be a bipartisan push. It’s the only way to do it effectively, to get it into legislation, because we see what happens with the regulatory environment, as the shifts of Administrations go from one to the other at the federal level.”

    Click HERE to watch Chairman Capito’s opening statement.

    Click HERE to watch Chairman Capito’s questions.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    February 13, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Security: Backbone University 2025

    Source: United States INDO PACIFIC COMMAND

    CAMP HUMPHREYS, South Korea  –  

    A joint force of 89 Republic of Korea and U.S. senior Noncommissioned Officers came together from across the Korean Peninsula to attend the 2025 iteration of Backbone University, February 3-7, on Camp Humphreys.

    Backbone University is a one-week developmental course focused on providing NCOs of the E-7 pay-grade with an understanding of the joint operations environment while instilling valuable lessons on leadership that they can take with them to improve their organizations and the military as whole.

    “This week was impressive. The strength of the Alliance and the future of our services and countries were in safe and capable hands with these outstanding senior NCOs and chief petty officers leading in our formations,” said Sgt. Maj. Joseph Gaskin, Operations Sergeant Major of United States Forces Korea and Backbone University Director. “For the first time, participants worked together on capstone projects which focused on learning from examples of Republic of Korea and U.S. Medal of Honor recipients from the Korean War. To see all these senior noncommissioned officers and chief petty officers from the joint and combined multinational force come together this week, overcome language barriers, work together in a mission command centric environment, intent based leadership, solve problems, face a very restrictive timeline, it was very inspiring to me.”

    The curriculum allowed participants to engage with senior leaders such as Gen. Xavier T. Brunson, Maj. Gen. William H. Taylor, and Command Sgt. Maj. Jack H. Love, who were more than keen to share their insights and experiences with leadership, an NCOs purpose and function in a senior commander’s staff, and core lessons they learned along their journey.

    “Some of the things that really stuck with me were the 15 Secrets of Leadership from Command Sgt. Maj. Love. I’m going to take those lessons back and give it to my junior leaders and senior leaders so we can get moving on the right direction,” said Sgt. 1st. Class Daltyn Phelps, battery operations NCO, 210th Field Artillery Brigade.

    “One of the 15 secrets to leadership was inspect what you expect, and that really struck a chord with me coming from the airborne community. A lot of things get overlooked, like hands in pockets, things not being buttoned down or not having the right tools on you. That really struck me because I feel like that’s one thing that we can improve on as senior NCOs.”

    Participants started and ended each training day with teambuilding focused events such as: PT sessions led by Marine Forces Korea, Special Operations Command Korea, and Combined Forces Command; dodgeball tournaments and traditional Korean field day events such as three legged races; and the ‘Culminator’, which saw platoons fight through a six-mile-long slog of ice and snow all the while tackling obstacles, and carrying supplies such as water cans and simulated casualties.

    “Being in this training is beneficial for me personally, because I have never really worked with different branches before,” said Chief Petty Officer Voss, logistics specialist, Command Navy Forces Korea. “I’m grateful for this opportunity to work with Army, Marines, Air Force, and also ROK forces, because we have exercises where we have to brainstorm and learn about how the other branches approach problems, and we come up with different solutions that we wouldn’t normally think of, and as a group we produce better products.”

    “We had many branches from Korea, the U.S., and even New Zealand working together,” said Master Sgt. Joo-Won Hong, Republic of Korea Air Force, 19th Fighter Wing. “There were a lot of opportunities for me to integrate with our Alliance partners and learn different ways to tackle the challenges.”

    Ultimately, Backbone University is about building strong, joint teams, reaffirming the strength of the ROK-U.S. Alliance, and preparing a stronger NCO Corps capable of dominating the battlefield.

    “You know, as you watch these NCOs come together, overcome all the barriers of communication, and draw upon lessons from the past to drive us into the future, the way they engage with the senior mentors who came to visit each day, the tough questions that they proposed, all of them really inspired me,” said Gaskin. “This easily fits the purpose of our core of NCOs and chief petty officers; we’re fighting and war winning. The grit these NCOs displayed this week tells me that our Alliance is strong, and our future is solid. We’re in capable hands with each one of these people who are leading our formations.”

    MIL Security OSI –

    February 13, 2025
  • MIL-Evening Report: ‘A house battery you can drive around’: how a handful of Australians are selling power from their cars back to the grid

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Scott Dwyer, Research Director, Energy Futures, University of Technology Sydney

    24K-Productions

    Our cars sit unused most of the time. If you have an electric vehicle, you might leave it charging at home or work after driving it. But there’s another step you could take. If you have a bidirectional charger, you can set it to sell power back to the grid when demand is high.

    Fewer than ten people across Australia actually do this, because the technology – known as Vehicle-to-Grid (V2G) – is very new. To date, it only works with a single car model (Nissan LEAF) and a single charger (Wallbox Quasar 1). We’ve estimated the number of users based on sales of this charger. The chargers are expensive and there’s a thicket of regulations to navigate.

    But that could soon change. Last year, Climate Change Minister Chris Bowen announced new Australian standards and communications protocols for bidirectional chargers in a bid to make it mainstream. Cheaper EVs and bidirectional chargers will make this more appealing.

    If it takes off, V2G could become extremely useful to the power grid as a way to release power as required and stabilise the grid against fluctuations.

    This week, Australia’s renewable energy agency released a V2G roadmap, which notes widespread uptake could “materially reduce electricity costs for consumers and accelerate national emissions reduction”.

    To understand why people are using the technology and the challenges to do so, we interviewed five early adopters from New South Wales and South Australia. Our findings are released today.

    A bidirectional charger is necessary to sell power back to the grid.
    doublelee/Shutterstock

    Setting up V2G isn’t easy

    Our interviewees reported a long, complex journey to set up V2G. These early adopters had no playbook to follow, so the process was one of trial and error.

    Some relied on professional networks or social media groups to gather information. They spent significant time and energy finding electricians, installers and charger manufacturers to set up their systems. Strata approvals were required. They also had to negotiate with power retailers and distributors.

    Delays were common, especially when seeking approval from the energy distributor. Some interviewees reported delays of months to years.

    Most interviewees had experience in a technical field such as engineering or technology. Some reported a significant learning curve, while others using new software from their retailer reported a smoother “set and forget” process.

    So why do it? Our interviewees had several reasons, ranging from getting the most out of expensive assets (solar and the EV) to offsetting power bills entirely.

    Four out of five interviewees reported making a small profit of about A$1,000 annually instead of a bill. Many wanted to be able to reduce dependence on the grid and reduce their environmental impact.

    As one told us:

    you originally think of it as a car you can also use to power your house. [But actually] it’s a house battery you can drive around.

    Maximising savings

    Typically, our interviewees plugged their car in at home during the day to charge from their rooftop solar. In the evenings when power prices peaked, they used an app to sell power back to the grid. This maximised their cost savings for charging the car battery and their earnings from the grid.

    For instance, a V2G user was alerted by their energy retailer that power prices had spiked to over $20 per kilowatt hour – far above normal rates of 25–45 cents. They immediately set their car and home battery to sell power back to the grid. In two hours, they sold 28 kilowatt hours of power to the grid and made more than $560. As they told us: “I look forward to more such events.”

    Our interviewees often monitored energy prices, solar output and car battery levels to optimise their output. To avoid their EV battery getting too low, they set a lower limit – say 30% of charge – after which their car would stop exporting power.

    This photo shows the setup of one of our early adopter interviewees. Pictured is the Nissan LEAF and bidirectional charger. For years, this has been the only car model compatible with vehicle to grid, but this is set to change.
    Author provided, CC BY-NC-ND

    Is there a downside?

    One of the main reasons people are sceptical of V2G is due to concern about accelerated degradation of the battery.

    This is a common concern. But to date, there’s no consensus showing V2G shortens the battery life of EVs significantly. One recent study shows it increases degradation by 0.3% a year. But another showed V2G might actually extend battery life in some scenarios.

    Last year, we surveyed more than 1,300 members of a motoring organisation about their view of V2G technology. We found battery warranty was a bigger concern than battery life. This is because most EV manufacturers other than Nissan don’t mention V2G in their battery warranties, leading drivers to believe they might void their warranty by using V2G.

    Awareness of V2G technology is growing. The survey also found almost 40% of respondents were very or somewhat familiar with V2G, a jump from the 17% who reported familiarity in 2022. Among EV owners, almost 90% reported knowledge of the concept.

    Moving beyond early adopters

    For V2G to go mainstream, the process must be much simpler, cheaper and easier to set up.

    To accelerate uptake, reliable, accessible information is essential.

    Expanding government incentive programs to include bidirectional chargers would cut the upfront cost and make it more accessible.

    Even within the EV supply chain, knowledge of V2G is limited. Car dealerships will need to know which models work with V2G.

    Electricians may need specific training to install and maintain these chargers.

    EVs are falling in price as manufacturers vie for market share and cheaper options become available. V2G capabilities might help boost sales for competing car companies.

    As more motorists switch to EVs, interest in V2G will increase. While V2G can boost the appeal of EVs, there are others, such as Vehicle-to-Home (using your car to power your home during blackouts or to save money) and Vehicle-to-Load (using your EV to run power tools or appliances).

    Each of these can help consumers get more value from the vehicles parked in driveways and garages.

    Scott Dwyer receives funding from iMOVE Australia Cooperative Research Centre and the NRMA for this project.

    Scott Dwyer receives funding from iMOVE Australia Cooperative Research Centre and the NRMA for this project.

    Kriti Nagrath receives funding from iMOVE Australia Cooperative Research Centre and the NRMA for this project.

    – ref. ‘A house battery you can drive around’: how a handful of Australians are selling power from their cars back to the grid – https://theconversation.com/a-house-battery-you-can-drive-around-how-a-handful-of-australians-are-selling-power-from-their-cars-back-to-the-grid-249696

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

    February 13, 2025
  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Fossil fuel anti-protest bills in Montana, Virginia, and Illinois threaten free speech and climate advocacy

    Source: Greenpeace Statement –

    © Tim Aubry / Greenpeace

    Already this year, lawmakers in Montana, Virginia, and Illinois have introduced bills that would hand corporations and prosecutors new tools to suppress climate activism. 

    Although proponents frame these bills as public safety measures, there is no evidence that they improve energy reliability or make communities safer. To the contrary, they contain intentionally broad provisions that would make climate advocates, environmental defenders, and landowners vulnerable to felony prosecution for infractions that are historically linked to protest. 

    In light of Big Oil’s death drive to keep the world hooked on fossil fuels (now with the federal government’s total support), policies that take aim at our right to protest make all of us less safe by undermining the urgent action that is needed to preserve a livable future.

    Twenty-three states already have some form of these laws in place.1 Certain components of them pose an obvious threat to climate protest (for example, boosting penalties for simple trespass near fossil fuel infrastructure), but no less dangerous are vague provisions that target “impeding” fossil fuel infrastructure or “causing damages.”

    Under some laws, it is unclear whether these provisions could be used to impose draconian penalties upon individuals engaged in peaceful sit-ins or symbolic protest actions such as painting a slogan on a pipeline without damaging its functionality. In recent years, oil and gas companies have sought large monetary damages from activists for alleged costs associated with project delays.2 Moreover, fossil fuel spokespeople and their allies in government routinely frame acts of civil disobedience as violent attacks deserving of deterrence and aggressive retaliation.

    Laws with intentionally broad language allow authorities to hang the threat of prosecution over activists’ heads, even if the most extreme charges are not pursued or eventually dropped. Further, they can force individuals and organizations into costly legal battles.

    A closer look at the new crop of anti-protest bills below:

    • Montana HB 257 would build on the state’s existing anti-protest law by removing the condition that sites classified as “critical infrastructure” be enclosed by a fence or identified by signage. The bill drew support from business groups representing ExxonMobil, Continental Resources, the American Chemistry Council, and other members in a January 27 committee hearing.
    • Virginia HB 2215 would make “damaging” certain facilities and equipment a class 3 felony, punishable by 5-20 years in prison. The primary sponsor, VA Rep. Terry Kilgore, is a long-time member of the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) and has accepted more than $380,000 in campaign donations from Dominion Energy over his political career. ALEC, an organization that invites corporate lobbyists to help draft model bills that are promoted with state officials around the country, has played a key role in the spread of anti-protest laws since 2016. Dominion Energy has also lobbied for anti-protest laws, including to explicitly “address civil disobedience towards pipelines,” according to emails obtained by public records request.
    • Illinois HB 1480 would create a new felony offense that could cover nonviolent protesters at pipeline and other infrastructure sites with maximum penalties of 3–7 years imprisonment and a $20,000 fine. It would also extend liability to anyone who “conspires with” a person to commit the offense. This last provision is especially pernicious due to the history of prosecutors using scattershot conspiracy allegations to target individuals and organizations with shared political views absent evidence of specific crimes. IL Rep. Patrick Windhorst, the primary sponsor of this bill, is also a member of ALEC.

    For more information about these anti-protest bills and related lobbying activity, see here.

    Related to the push for fossil fuel anti-protest laws are strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs). Greenpeace is facing a costly SLAPP brought by Energy Transfer, the owner of the Dakota Access Pipeline, in North Dakota state court, which goes to trial this month. Further, California Attorney General Rob Banta, the Sierra Club and other environmental groups were sued for defamation by ExxonMobil this January after the defendants sought to hold Exxon legally accountable for its role in the plastics crisis.


     1Twenty-two states were counted for Greenpeace USA’s Dollars vs. Democracy 2023 report. The twenty-third state to pass a fossil fuel anti-protest law was Florida with H 275 / S 340 (2024).

    2 For example, see Mountain Valley Pipeline’s lawsuit against climate protesters. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/sep/27/mountain-valley-pipeline-protest 

     3 For more about this, see “The Fossil Fuel Industry Used ALEC to Spread Fossil Fuel Anti-Protest Laws Across the Country” on page 30 of Dollars vs. Democracy 2023.

    MIL OSI NGO –

    February 13, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Security: Update 274 – IAEA Director General Statement on Situation in Ukraine

    Source: International Atomic Energy Agency – IAEA

    Today’s scheduled rotation of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) team currently based at Ukraine’s Zaporizhzhya Nuclear Power Plant (ZNPP) was cancelled as a result of intense military activity in the region, Director General Rafael Mariano Grossi said.

    Despite written assurances received from both sides that the planned rotation could take place safely, the situation proved to be too dangerous for the teams to continue and the mission was aborted.

    “I deeply regret today’s cancellation of the carefully prepared and agreed rotation of our staff, who are carrying out vital work in very challenging circumstances to help prevent a nuclear accident during the military conflict. It is completely unacceptable that the safety of our staff is jeopardised in this way,” Director General Grossi said.

    “As a result of these extremely concerning events, I am in active consultation with both sides to guarantee the safety of our teams and to secure the continued presence of the IAEA at the Zaporizhzhya Nuclear Power Plant to enable our staff to continue their indispensable mission, helping to maintain nuclear safety and security,” he said.

    MIL Security OSI –

    February 13, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: Precision Drilling Announces 2024 Fourth Quarter and Year End Unaudited Financial Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    CALGARY, Alberta, Feb. 12, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — This news release contains “forward-looking information and statements” within the meaning of applicable securities laws. For a full disclosure of the forward-looking information and statements and the risks to which they are subject, see the “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information and Statements” later in this news release. This news release contains references to certain Financial Measures and Ratios, including Adjusted EBITDA (earnings before income taxes, gain on acquisition, loss on investments and other assets, gain on repurchase of unsecured senior notes, finance charges, foreign exchange, loss on asset decommissioning, gain on asset disposals and depreciation and amortization), Funds Provided by (Used in) Operations, Net Capital Spending, Working Capital and Total Long-term Financial Liabilities. These terms do not have standardized meanings prescribed under International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and may not be comparable to similar measures used by other companies. See “Financial Measures and Ratios” later in this news release.

    Financial Highlights and 2025 Capital Allocation Plans

    • Revenue in the fourth quarter was $468 million, an 8% decrease from 2023 as activity increases in Canadian drilling, well servicing, and international were more than offset by lower activity and day rates in the U.S.
    • Adjusted EBITDA(1) was $121 million in the quarter and included $15 million of share-based compensation charges, $4 million for rig reactivation costs and $4 million of non-recurring charges. In 2023, fourth quarter Adjusted EBITDA was $151 million and included share-based compensation charges of $13 million.
    • Net earnings attributable to shareholders was $15 million or $1.06 per share in the fourth quarter compared to $147 million or $10.42 per share as net earnings in 2023 included an income tax recovery of $69 million and a gain on acquisition of $26 million.
    • In 2024, we invested $217 million into our fleet and infrastructure, including multiple contracted rig upgrades and the strategic purchase of drill pipe for use in 2025. We expect to invest $225 million into our fleet and infrastructure in 2025, which may fluctuate with activity levels and customer contract upgrade opportunities.
    • For the year ended December 31, 2024, we achieved our annual debt reduction and return of shareholder capital targets, reducing debt by $176 million and repurchasing $75 million of common shares while building cash by $20 million. Precision has consistently met or exceeded its capital allocation goals since implementation in 2016.
    • For 2025, we expect to reduce debt by at least $100 million in 2025 and have increased our long-term debt reduction target to $700 million and extended our debt reduction period to 2027. In 2025, we plan to increase direct shareholder returns to 35% to 45% of free cash flow, before debt repayments. To the extent excess cash is generated these allocations may be increased.

    Operational Highlights

    • Demand for our services continues to be strong and in 2024 our Canadian and international drilling rig utilization days increased 12% and 37%, respectively, while our well servicing rig operating hours increased 26% over 2023.
    • In the fourth quarter, Canada’s activity averaged 65 active drilling rigs versus 64 in the same quarter last year. Our Super Triple and Super Single rigs remain in high demand and are nearly fully utilized. Canadian revenue per utilization day was $35,675, up from $34,616 in the fourth quarter of 2023.
    • Our U.S. activity has remained relatively consistent since mid-2024. We averaged 34 drilling rigs in the fourth quarter with revenue per utilization day of US$30,991 versus 45 drilling rigs at US$34,452 in 2023’s fourth quarter.
    • International activity increased 6% over the same period last year while revenue per utilization day was US$49,636 compared to US$49,872 in the fourth quarter of 2023.
    • Service rig operating hours in the fourth quarter totaled 59,834, representing a 6% increase over the same quarter last year partially driven by the CWC Energy Services Corp. (CWC) acquisition in November of 2023.

    (1) See “FINANCIAL MEASURES AND RATIOS.”

    MANAGEMENT COMMENTARY

    “Through 2024 Precision demonstrated remarkable market resilience despite weaker than expected U.S. customer demand and late year customer budget exhaustion in Canada. We continued our long-term record of meeting or exceeding our capital allocation targets every year since 2016 with $176 million of debt reduction, $75 million of share buybacks, while increasing our cash balance by $20 million. In the fourth quarter, approximately $8 million of reactivation costs and non-recurring items impacted our financial results, along with slightly lower than expected Canadian customer demand. Despite these fourth quarter headwinds we continued investing in our core business lines, including purchasing approximately $18 million of drill pipe in advance of potential tariffs, investing $3 million to begin reactivating two idle Canadian Super Single rigs to meet demand in 2025, and upgrading one rig for Canadian heavy oil pad drilling opportunities.

    “The outlook for Canada remains very strong given robust heavy oil activity following the startup of the Trans Mountain pipeline expansion in May 2024 and the imminent startup of LNG Canada in mid-2025. My enthusiasm is further underpinned by the pace of rig reactivations following the seasonal Christmas break and the stable winter activity we have experienced to date with 81 rigs working since mid-January. The uncertainty introduced by potential U.S. tariffs on Canadian oil and gas exports, has been tempered and we have not experienced any change in customer demand or their longer-term capital spending plans.

    “In Canada, our drilling utilization days increased 12% over 2023 and our Super Triple and Super Single rigs, which represent approximately 80% of our Canadian fleet, are nearly fully utilized. Demand for our Super Triple fleet, which is the preferred rig for Montney drilling, is driven by robust condensate fundamentals and the startup of LNG Canada this year. Demand for our Super Single fleet is driven by increased activity in heavy oil targeted areas as customers are benefiting from improved commodity pricing, following the startup of Trans Mountain, and a softening Canadian dollar.

    “Internationally, our drilling utilization days increased 37% in 2024 following the recertification and reactivation of four rigs in 2023. In 2024, we had eight rigs working on term contracts, five in Kuwait and three in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The majority of these rigs are under five-year term contracts that extend into 2027 and 2028, providing predictable cash flow for the next few years.

    “In our Completion and Production Services business, our well servicing operating hours increased 26% over 2023 levels following the successful integration of CWC, where we achieved significant operating synergies. Our Completion and Production Services Adjusted EBITDA increased 30% year over year, which was slightly below our expectation due to late year customer budget exhaustion impacting our activity and rental business. I am very pleased with how we have transformed our Completion and Production Services business with two strategic tuck-in acquisitions. The High Arctic and CWC acquisitions more than doubled our Completion and Production revenue and Adjusted EBITDA since 2021 and solidified Precision as the premier well service provider in Canada.

    “During the year, Precision generated $482 million of cash provided by operations, allowing us to meet our capital return targets and invest $217 million into our fleet and infrastructure, which included multiple drilling rig upgrades and the strategic purchase of drill pipe for use in 2025. We expect to invest approximately $225 million in 2025, which reflects a weaker Canadian dollar and includes expected customer funded upgrades across our North American operations, including approximately $30 million in US fleet upgrades for customers targeting extended reach laterals.

    “With sustained free cash flow as a key differentiator of our business, we remain focused on reducing debt and increasing direct returns to shareholders. In 2025, we expect to reduce debt by at least $100 million, reinforcing our commitment to achieving a sustained Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDA ratio(1) of below 1.0 times. As we continue to realize the benefits of lower debt levels, we have increased our long-term debt reduction target by $100 million to $700 million and extended the debt reduction period by one year to 2027. In 2025, our goal is to increase our direct capital returns to shareholders by allocating 35% to 45% of free cash flow, before debt repayments, while continuing to move towards 50% of free cash flow thereafter, with excess cash potentially used to increase these allocations.

    “I would like to thank our employees for their dedication and commitment to serving our customers, and our shareholders for their continued support. With positive long-term fundamentals associated with global oil and natural gas demand and particularly the unique fundamentals driving drilling activity in our core geographic markets, I am confident we will continue to drive shareholder value,” concluded Mr. Neveu.

    (1) See “FINANCIAL MEASURES AND RATIOS.”

    SELECT FINANCIAL AND OPERATING INFORMATION
    Financial Highlights

      For the three months ended
    December 31,
        For the year ended
    December 31,
     
    (Stated in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts)   2024       2023     % Change       2024       2023     % Change  
    Revenue   468,171       506,871       (7.6 )     1,902,328       1,937,854       (1.8 )
    Adjusted EBITDA(1)   120,526       151,231       (20.3 )     521,221       611,118       (14.7 )
    Net earnings   14,930       146,722       (89.8 )     111,330       289,244       (61.5 )
    Net earnings attributable to shareholders   14,795       146,722       (89.9 )     111,195       289,244       (61.6 )
    Cash provided by operations   162,791       170,255       (4.4 )     482,083       500,571       (3.7 )
    Funds provided by operations(1)   120,535       145,189       (17.0 )     463,372       533,409       (13.1 )
                                       
    Cash used in investing activities   61,954       57,627       7.5       202,986       214,784       (5.5 )
    Capital spending by spend category(1)                                  
    Expansion and upgrade   21,565       24,459       (11.8 )     52,066       63,898       (18.5 )
    Maintenance and infrastructure   37,335       54,388       (31.4 )     164,632       162,851       1.1  
    Proceeds on sale   (8,570 )     (3,117 )     174.9       (30,395 )     (23,841 )     27.5  
    Net capital spending(1)   50,330       75,730       (33.5 )     186,303       202,908       (8.2 )
                                       
    Net earnings attributable to shareholders per share:                                  
    Basic   1.06       10.42       (89.8 )     7.81       21.03       (62.8 )
    Diluted   1.06       9.81       (89.2 )     7.81       19.53       (60.0 )
    Weighted average shares outstanding:                                  
    Basic   13,982       14,084       (0.7 )     14,229       13,754       3.5  
    Diluted   13,987       15,509       (9.8 )     14,234       15,287       (6.9 )

    (1) See “FINANCIAL MEASURES AND RATIOS.”
    Operating Highlights

      For the three months ended
    December 31,
        For the year ended
    December 31,
     
      2024     2023     % Change     2024     2023     % Change  
    Contract drilling rig fleet   214       214       –       214       214       –  
    Drilling rig utilization days:                                  
    U.S.   3,084       4,138       (25.5 )     12,969       17,961       (27.8 )
    Canada   6,018       5,909       1.8       23,685       21,156       12.0  
    International   736       693       6.2       2,928       2,132       37.3  
    Revenue per utilization day:                                  
    U.S. (US$)   30,991       34,452       (10.0 )     32,531       35,040       (7.2 )
    Canada (Cdn$)   35,675       34,616       3.1       34,797       33,151       5.0  
    International (US$)   49,636       49,872       (0.5 )     51,227       50,840       0.8  
    Operating costs per utilization day:                                  
    U.S. (US$)   21,698       21,039       3.1       22,009       20,401       7.9  
    Canada (Cdn$)   21,116       19,191       10.0       20,424       19,225       6.2  
                                       
    Service rig fleet   170       183       (7.1 )     170       183       (7.1 )
    Service rig operating hours   59,834       56,683       5.6       254,224       201,627       26.1  

    Drilling Activity

      Average for the quarter ended 2023   Average for the quarter ended 2024  
      Mar. 31     June 30     Sept. 30     Dec. 31     Mar. 31     June 30     Sept. 30     Dec. 31  
    Average Precision active rig count(1):                                              
    U.S.   60       51       41       45       38       36       35       34  
    Canada   69       42       57       64       73       49       72       65  
    International   5       5       6       8       8       8       8       8  
    Total   134       98       104       117       119       93       115       107  

    (1) Average number of drilling rigs working or moving. 

    Financial Position

    (Stated in thousands of Canadian dollars, except ratios) December 31, 2024     December 31, 2023(2)  
    Working capital(1)   162,592       136,872  
    Cash   73,771       54,182  
    Long-term debt   812,469       914,830  
    Total long-term financial liabilities(1)   888,173       995,849  
    Total assets   2,956,315       3,019,035  
    Long-term debt to long-term debt plus equity ratio (1)   0.33       0.37  

    (1) See “FINANCIAL MEASURES AND RATIOS.”
    (2) Comparative period figures were restated due to a change in accounting policy. See “CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING POLICY.”

    Summary for the three months ended December 31, 2024:

    • Revenue decreased to $468 million compared with $507 million in the fourth quarter of 2023 as a result of lower U.S. activity and day rates, partially offset by higher Canadian and international activity.
    • Adjusted EBITDA was $121 million in the quarter and included $15 million of share-based compensation charges, $4 million for rig reactivation costs and $4 million of non-recurring charges. In 2023, fourth quarter Adjusted EBITDA was $151 million and included share-based compensation of $13 million. Please refer to “Other Items” later in this news release for additional information on share-based compensation charges.
    • Adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of revenue was 26% as compared with 30% in 2023.
    • Net earnings attributable to shareholders was $15 million compared to $147 million in the same quarter last year as net earnings in 2023 included an income tax recovery of $69 million and a gain on acquisition of $26 million.
    • Generated cash provided by operations of $163 million, reduced debt by $25 million through the partial redemption of our 2026 unsecured senior notes and repayment of our U.S. Real Estate Credit Facility, repurchased $25 million of common shares under our Normal Course Issuer Bid (NCIB), and ended the quarter with $74 million of cash and more than $575 million of available liquidity.
    • U.S. revenue per utilization day, excluding the impact of idle but contracted rigs was US$30,813 compared with US$32,819 in 2023, a decrease of 6%. Sequentially, revenue per utilization day, excluding idle but contracted rigs, was down 6% compared with the third quarter of 2024. Fourth quarter U.S. revenue per utilization day was US$30,991 compared with US$34,452 in 2023. The decrease was primarily the result of lower fleet average day rates, idle but contracted rig revenue and recoverable costs. We recognized US$1 million of revenue from idle but contracted rigs in the quarter as compared with US$7 million in 2023.
    • U.S. operating costs per utilization day increased to US$21,698 compared with US$21,039 in 2023. The increase was mainly due to higher rig operating costs and fixed costs spread over lower activity, offset by lower recoverable costs and repairs and maintenance. Sequentially, operating costs per utilization day were down 2% due to lower recoverable costs.
    • Canadian revenue per utilization day was $35,675, an increase from the $34,616 realized in 2023 due to higher average day rates and recoverable costs. Sequentially, revenue per utilization day increased $3,350 due to higher boiler revenue and higher fleet-wide average day rates.
    • Canadian operating costs per utilization day increased to $21,116, compared with $19,191 in 2023, resulting from higher repairs and maintenance, rig reactivation costs and impact of labour rate increases. Sequentially, daily operating costs increased $1,668 and were the result of higher labour expenses due to rate increases, recoverable expenses and repairs and maintenance.
    • Internationally, fourth quarter revenue increased 6% from 2023 as we realized revenue of US$37 million versus US$35 million in the prior year. Our higher revenue was primarily the result of a 6% increase in activity, which was negatively impacted by a planned rig recertification accounting for 21 non-billable utilization days in October. International revenue per utilization day was US$49,636 compared with US$49,872 in 2023.
    • Completion and Production Services revenue was $69 million, an increase of $6 million from 2023, as our fourth quarter service rig operating hours increased 6%, reflecting the successful integration of the CWC acquisition in November 2023.
    • General and administrative expenses were $35 million as compared with $39 million in 2023 primarily due to lower non-recurring costs associated with our CWC acquisition in 2023, partially offset by higher share-based compensation charges.
    • Net finance charges were $16 million, a decrease of $3 million compared with 2023 as a result of lower interest expense on our outstanding debt balance.
    • Capital expenditures were $59 million compared with $79 million in 2023 and by spend category included $22 million for expansion and upgrades and $37 million for the maintenance of existing assets, infrastructure, and intangible assets.
    • Income tax expense for the quarter was $6 million as compared with a recovery of $69 million in 2023. During the fourth quarter, we continue to not recognize deferred tax assets on certain international operating losses.

    Summary for the year ended December 31, 2024:

    • Revenue for the year was $1,902 million, comparable with 2023.
    • Adjusted EBITDA was $521 million as compared with $611 million in 2023. Our lower Adjusted EBITDA was primarily attributed to decreased U.S. drilling results and $13 million of higher share-based compensation, partially offset by the strengthening of Canadian and international results.
    • Net earnings attributable to shareholders was $111 million compared to $289 million in the prior year. Our lower current year net earnings was due to the impact of decreased U.S. drilling results, higher income tax expense of $67 million and the gain on acquisition of $26 million recognized in 2023.
    • Cash provided by operations was $482 million as compared with $501 million in 2023. Funds provided by operations were $463 million, a decrease of $70 million from the comparative period.
    • General and administrative costs were $132 million, an increase of $10 million from 2023 primarily due to higher share-based compensation charges.
    • Net finance charges were $70 million, $14 million lower than 2023 due to our lower interest expense on our outstanding debt balance.
    • Capital expenditures were $217 million in 2024, a decrease of $10 million from 2023. Capital spending by spend category included $52 million for expansion and upgrades and $165 million for the maintenance of existing assets, infrastructure, and intangible assets.
    • Reduced debt by $176 million from the partial redemption of our 2026 unsecured senior notes and repayment of our Canadian and U.S. Real Estate Credit Facilities.
    • Repurchased $75 million of common shares under our NCIB.

    STRATEGY

    Precision’s vision is to be globally recognized as the High Performance, High Value provider of land drilling services. We work toward this vision by defining and measuring our results against strategic priorities that we establish at the beginning of every year.

    Below we summarize the results of our 2024 strategic priorities:

    1. Concentrate organizational efforts on leveraging our scale and generating free cash flow.
      • Generated cash provided from operations of $482 million, allowing us to meet our debt reduction and share repurchase goals and build our cash balance by $20 million.
      • Increased utilization of our Super Single and tele double rigs, driving Canadian drilling activity up 12% over 2023.
      • Successfully integrated our 2023 CWC acquisition, increasing Completion and Production Services operating hours and Adjusted EBITDA 26% and 30%, respectively, year over year. Achieved our $20 million annual synergies target from the acquisition.
      • Internationally, increased our activity 37% year over year and realized US$150 million of contract drilling revenue compared to US$108 million in 2023.
    2. Reduce debt by between $150 million and $200 million and allocate 25% to 35% of free cash flow before debt repayments for share repurchases.
      • Reduced debt by $176 million and ended the year with a Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDA ratio of approximately 1.4 times. On track to achieve a sustained Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDA ratio of below 1.0 times.
      • Returned $75 million to shareholders through share repurchases, achieving the midpoint of our target range.
      • Renewed our NCIB in September, allowing repurchases of up to 10% of the public float.
    3. Continue to deliver operational excellence in drilling and service rig operations to strengthen our competitive position and extend market penetration of our AlphaTMand EverGreenTMproducts.
      • Increased our Canadian drilling rig utilization days and well service rig operating hours year over year, maintaining our position as the leading provider of high-quality and reliable services in Canada.
      • Invested $52 million in expansion and upgrade capital to enhance our drilling rigs.
      • Nearly doubled our EverGreenTM revenue year over year.
      • Continued to expand our EverGreenTM product offering on our Super Single rigs with LED mast lighting and hydrogen injection systems.

    2025 Strategic Priorities

    1. Maximize free cash flow through disciplined capital deployment and strict cost management.
    2. Enhance shareholder returns through debt reduction and share repurchases.
      1. Reduce debt by at least $100 million in 2025 and debt by $700 million between 2022 and 2027, while remaining committed to achieving a sustained Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDA ratio of below 1.0 times.
      2. Allocate 35% to 45% of free cash flow, before debt repayments, directly to shareholders and continue moving direct shareholder capital returns toward 50% of free cash flow thereafter.
      3. Grow revenue in existing service lines through contracted upgrades, optimized pricing and utilization, and opportunistic consolidating tuck-in acquisitions.
      4. OUTLOOK

        The long-term outlook for global energy demand remains positive with rising demand for all types of energy including oil and natural gas driven by economic growth, increasing demand from third-world regions, and emerging energy sources of power demand. Oil prices are constructive as OPEC+ continues to honour its production quotas, producers remain committed to returning capital to shareholders versus increasing production, and geopolitical issues continue to threaten supply. In Canada, the Trans Mountain pipeline expansion, which became operational in May of 2024, combined with the imminent startup of LNG Canada are projected to provide significant tidewater access for Canadian crude oil and natural gas, supporting additional Canadian drilling activity. In the U.S., the next wave of Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) export terminals is expected to add approximately 11 bcf/d of export capacity from 2025 to 2028, supporting additional U.S. natural gas drilling activity. Coal retirements and a build-out of artificial intelligence data centers could provide further support for natural gas drilling.

        Our Canadian drilling activity continues to be robust in 2025 and we currently have 81 rigs operating and expect this activity level to continue until spring breakup. Our Super Single fleet is near full utilization as heavy oil customers are benefiting from improved commodity pricing and a weak Canadian dollar. Our Super Triple fleet, the preferred rig for Montney drilling, is also nearly fully utilized, and with the expected startup of LNG Canada in mid-2025, rig demand could exceed supply. Overall, we expect our Canadian drilling activity to be up year over year with near full utilization of our Super Series rigs, which should support day rates and increase demand for term contracts as customers secure rigs to ensure fulfillment of their development programs. The uncertainty introduced by potential U.S. tariffs on Canadian oil and gas exports, has been tempered and we have not experienced any change in customer demand or their longer-term plans.

        In the U.S., we currently have 34 rigs earning revenue, which has been relatively consistent since mid-2024. Drilling activity growth remains constrained as producers continue to focus on shareholder returns rather than growth, while volatile commodity prices, customer consolidation, and drilling and completion efficiencies have restricted activity growth. If commodity prices remain stable and around today’s level, we expect drilling demand to begin to improve in the second half and gain momentum through the remainder of 2025 as new LNG export capacity is added and customers seek to maintain or possibly increase production levels.

        Internationally, we have eight rigs working on term contracts, five in Kuwait and three in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The majority of these rigs are under five-year term contracts that extend into 2027 and 2028, providing predictable cash flow for the next few years. We continue to bid our remaining idle rigs within the region and remain optimistic in our ability to secure rig reactivations.

        As the premier well service provider in Canada, the outlook for this business remains positive. We expect the Trans Mountain pipeline expansion and LNG Canada to drive more service-related activity, while increased regulatory spending requirements are expected to result in more abandonment work. Customer demand should remain strong, and with continued labour constraints, we expect firm pricing into the foreseeable future.

        Contracts

        The following chart outlines the average number of drilling rigs under term contract by quarter as at February 12, 2025. For those quarters ending after December 31, 2024, this chart represents the minimum number of term contracts from which we will earn revenue. We expect the actual number of contracted rigs to vary in future periods as we sign additional term contracts.

        As at February 12, 2025   Average for the quarter ended 2024     Average     Average for the quarter ended 2025     Average  
            Mar. 31     June 30     Sept. 30     Dec. 31     2024     Mar. 31     June 30     Sept. 30     Dec. 31     2025  
        Average rigs under term contract:                                                            
        U.S.     20       17       17       16       18       15       13       8       6       11  
        Canada     24       22       23       23       23       20       19       18       14       18  
        International     8       8       8       8       8       8       8       7       7       8  
        Total     52       47       48       47       49       43       40       33       27       37  


        SEGMENTED FINANCIAL RESULTS

        Precision’s operations are reported in two segments: Contract Drilling Services, which includes our drilling rig, oilfield supply and manufacturing divisions; and Completion and Production Services, which includes our service rig, rental and camp and catering divisions.

          For the three months ended December 31,     For the year ended December 31,  
        (Stated in thousands of Canadian dollars)   2024     2023     % Change       2024     2023     % Change  
        Revenue:                                  
        Contract Drilling Services   402,610       446,503       (9.8 )     1,617,735       1,704,265       (5.1 )
        Completion and Production Services   68,830       62,459       10.2       294,817       240,716       22.5  
        Inter-segment eliminations   (3,269 )     (2,091 )     56.3       (10,224 )     (7,127 )     43.5  
            468,171       506,871       (7.6 )     1,902,328       1,937,854       (1.8 )
        Adjusted EBITDA:(1)                                  
        Contract Drilling Services   125,683       162,459       (22.6 )     532,345       630,761       (15.6 )
        Completion and Production Services   15,895       12,193       30.4       66,681       51,224       30.2  
        Corporate and Other   (21,052 )     (23,421 )     (10.1 )     (77,805 )     (70,867 )     9.8  
            120,526       151,231       (20.3 )     521,221       611,118       (14.7 )

        (1) See “FINANCIAL MEASURES AND RATIOS.”

        SEGMENT REVIEW OF CONTRACT DRILLING SERVICES

          For the three months ended
        December 31,
            For the year ended
        December 31,
         
        (Stated in thousands of Canadian dollars, except where noted)   2024       2023     % Change       2024       2023     % Change  
        Revenue   402,610       446,503       (9.8 )     1,617,735       1,704,265       (5.1 )
        Expenses:                                  
        Operating   264,858       270,303       (2.0 )     1,041,068       1,030,053       1.1  
        General and administrative   12,069       13,741       (12.2 )     44,322       43,451       2.0  
        Adjusted EBITDA(1)   125,683       162,459       (22.6 )     532,345       630,761       (15.6 )
        Adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of revenue(1)   31.2 %     36.4 %           32.9 %     37.0 %      

        (1) See “FINANCIAL MEASURES AND RATIOS.”

        United States onshore drilling statistics:(1) 2024     2023  
          Precision     Industry(2)     Precision     Industry(2)  
        Average number of active land rigs for quarters ended:                      
        March 31   38       602       60       744  
        June 30   36       583       51       700  
        September 30   35       565       41       631  
        December 31   34       569       45       603  
        Year to date average   36       580       49       670  

        (1) United States lower 48 operations only.
        (2) Baker Hughes rig counts.

        Canadian onshore drilling statistics:(1) 2024     2023  
          Precision     Industry(2)     Precision     Industry(2)  
        Average number of active land rigs for quarters ended:                      
        March 31   73       208       69       221  
        June 30   49       134       42       117  
        September 30   72       207       57       188  
        December 31   65       194       64       181  
        Year to date average   65       186       58       177  

        (1) Canadian operations only.
        (2) Baker Hughes rig counts.

        SEGMENT REVIEW OF COMPLETION AND PRODUCTION SERVICES

          For the three months ended
        December 31,
            For the year ended
        December 31,
         
        (Stated in thousands of Canadian dollars, except where noted)   2024       2023     % Change       2024       2023      % Change  
        Revenue   68,830       62,459       10.2       294,817       240,716       22.5  
        Expenses:                                  
        Operating   50,714       48,297       5.0       217,842       181,622       19.9  
        General and administrative   2,221       1,969       12.8       10,294       7,870       30.8  
        Adjusted EBITDA(1)   15,895       12,193       30.4       66,681       51,224       30.2  
        Adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of revenue(1)   23.1 %     19.5 %           22.6 %     21.3 %      
        Well servicing statistics:                                  
        Number of service rigs (end of period)   170       183       (7.1 )     170       183       (7.1 )
        Service rig operating hours   59,834       56,683       5.6       254,224       201,627       26.1  
        Service rig operating hour utilization   38 %     38 %           42 %     42 %      

        (1) See “FINANCIAL MEASURES AND RATIOS.”

        OTHER ITEMS

        Share-based Incentive Compensation Plans

        We have several cash and equity-settled share-based incentive plans for non-management directors, officers, and other eligible employees. Our accounting policies for each share-based incentive plan can be found in our 2023 Annual Report.

        A summary of expense amounts under these plans during the reporting periods are as follows:

          For the three months ended
        December 31,
            For the year ended
        December 31,
         
        (Stated in thousands of Canadian dollars) 2024     2023     2024     2023  
        Cash settled share-based incentive plans   14,018       11,972       42,828       32,063  
        Equity settled share-based incentive plans   1,071       697       4,588       2,531  
        Total share-based incentive compensation plan expense   15,089       12,669       47,416       34,594  
                               
        Allocated:                      
        Operating   3,709       2,765       11,868       9,497  
        General and Administrative   11,380       9,904       35,548       25,097  
            15,089       12,669       47,416       34,594  


        FINANCIAL MEASURES AND RATIOS

        Non-GAAP Financial Measures
        We reference certain Non-Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (Non-GAAP) measures that are not defined terms under IFRS to assess performance because we believe they provide useful supplemental information to investors.
        Adjusted EBITDA We believe Adjusted EBITDA (earnings before income taxes, gain on acquisition, loss on investments and other assets, gain on repurchase of unsecured senior notes, finance charges, foreign exchange, loss on asset decommissioning, gain on asset disposals and depreciation and amortization), as reported in our Condensed Interim Consolidated Statements of Net Earnings and our reportable operating segment disclosures, is a useful measure because it gives an indication of the results from our principal business activities prior to consideration of how our activities are financed and the impact of foreign exchange, taxation and depreciation and amortization charges.

        The most directly comparable financial measure is net earnings.

          For the three months ended
        December 31,
            For the year ended
        December 31,
         
        (Stated in thousands of Canadian dollars)   2024       2023       2024       2023  
        Adjusted EBITDA by segment:                      
        Contract Drilling Services   125,683       162,459       532,345       630,761  
        Completion and Production Services   15,895       12,193       66,681       51,224  
        Corporate and Other   (21,052 )     (23,421 )     (77,805 )     (70,867 )
        Adjusted EBITDA   120,526       151,231       521,221       611,118  
        Depreciation and amortization   82,210       78,734       309,314       297,557  
        Gain on asset disposals   (1,913 )     (8,883 )     (16,148 )     (24,469 )
        Loss on asset decommissioning   —       9,592       —       9,592  
        Foreign exchange   1,487       (773 )     2,259       (1,667 )
        Finance charges   16,281       19,468       69,753       83,414  
        Gain on repurchase of unsecured notes   —       —       —       (137 )
        Loss on investments and other assets   1,814       735       1,484       6,810  
        Gain on acquisition   —       (25,761 )     —       (25,761 )
        Incomes taxes   5,717       (68,603 )     43,229       (23,465 )
        Net earnings   14,930       146,722       111,330       289,244  
        Non-controlling interests   135       —       135       —  
        Net earnings attributable to shareholders   14,795       146,722       111,195       289,244  
               
        Funds Provided by (Used in) Operations     We believe funds provided by (used in) operations, as reported in our Condensed Interim Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, is a useful measure because it provides an indication of the funds our principal business activities generate prior to consideration of working capital changes, which is primarily made up of highly liquid balances.

        The most directly comparable financial measure is cash provided by (used in) operations.

               
        Net Capital Spending     We believe net capital spending is a useful measure as it provides an indication of our primary investment activities.

        The most directly comparable financial measure is cash provided by (used in) investing activities.

        Net capital spending is calculated as follows:

            For the three months ended
        December 31,
            For the year ended
        December 31,
         
        (Stated in thousands of Canadian dollars)     2024       2023       2024       2023  
        Capital spending by spend category                        
        Expansion and upgrade     21,565       24,459       52,066       63,898  
        Maintenance, infrastructure and intangibles     37,335       54,388       164,632       162,851  
              58,900       78,847       216,698       226,749  
        Proceeds on sale of property, plant and equipment     (8,570 )     (3,117 )     (30,395 )     (23,841 )
        Net capital spending     50,330       75,730       186,303       202,908  
        Business acquisitions     —       646       —       28,646  
        Proceeds from sale of investments and other assets     —       —       (3,623 )     (10,013 )
        Purchase of investments and other assets     718       61       725       5,343  
        Receipt of finance lease payments     (208 )     (191 )     (799 )     (255 )
        Changes in non-cash working capital balances     11,114       (18,619 )     20,380       (11,845 )
        Cash used in investing activities     61,954       57,627       202,986       214,784  
        Working Capital We define working capital as current assets less current liabilities, as reported in our Condensed Interim Consolidated Statements of Financial Position.

        Working capital is calculated as follows:

          December 31,     December 31,  
        (Stated in thousands of Canadian dollars)   2024       2023  
        Current assets   501,284       510,881  
        Current liabilities   338,692       374,009  
        Working capital   162,592       136,872  
        Total Long-term Financial Liabilities We define total long-term financial liabilities as total non-current liabilities less deferred tax liabilities, as reported in our Condensed Interim Consolidated Statements of Financial Position.

        Total long-term financial liabilities is calculated as follows:

          December 31,     December 31,  
        (Stated in thousands of Canadian dollars)   2024       2023  
        Total non-current liabilities   935,624       1,069,364  
        Deferred tax liabilities   47,451       73,515  
        Total long-term financial liabilities   888,173       995,849  
        Non-GAAP Ratios
        We reference certain additional Non-GAAP ratios that are not defined terms under IFRS to assess performance because we believe they provide useful supplemental information to investors.
               
        Adjusted EBITDA % of Revenue     We believe Adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of consolidated revenue, as reported in our Condensed Interim Consolidated Statements of Net Earnings, provides an indication of our profitability from our principal business activities prior to consideration of how our activities are financed and the impact of foreign exchange, taxation and depreciation and amortization charges.
               
        Long-term debt to long-term debt plus equity     We believe that long-term debt (as reported in our Condensed Interim Consolidated Statements of Financial Position) to long-term debt plus equity (total shareholders’ equity as reported in our Condensed Interim Consolidated Statements of Financial Position) provides an indication of our debt leverage.
               
        Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDA     We believe that the Net Debt (long-term debt less cash, as reported in our Condensed Interim Consolidated Statements of Financial Position) to Adjusted EBITDA ratio provides an indication of the number of years it would take for us to repay our debt obligations.
         
        Supplementary Financial Measures
        We reference certain supplementary financial measures that are not defined terms under IFRS to assess performance because we believe they provide useful supplemental information to investors.
               
        Capital Spending by Spend Category     We provide additional disclosure to better depict the nature of our capital spending. Our capital spending is categorized as expansion and upgrade, maintenance and infrastructure, or intangibles.
               

        CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING POLICY

        Precision adopted Classification of Liabilities as Current or Non-current and Non-current Liabilities with Covenants – Amendments to IAS 1, as issued in 2020 and 2022. These amendments apply retrospectively for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2024 and clarify requirements for determining whether a liability should be classified as current or non-current. Due to this change in accounting policy, there was a retrospective impact on the comparative Statement of Financial Position pertaining to the Corporation’s Deferred Share Unit (DSU) plan for non-management directors which are redeemable in cash or for an equal number of common shares upon the director’s retirement. In the case of a director retiring, the director’s respective DSU liability would become payable and the Corporation would not have the right to defer settlement of the liability for at least twelve months. As such, the liability is impacted by the revised policy. The following changes were made to the Statement of Financial Position:

      • As at January 1, 2023, accounts payable and accrued liabilities increased by $12 million and non-current share-based compensation liability decreased by $12 million.
      • As at December 31, 2023, accounts payable and accrued liabilities increased by $8 million and non-current share-based compensation liability decreased by $8 million.

      The Corporation’s other liabilities were not impacted by the amendments. The change in accounting policy will also be reflected in the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements as at and for the year ending December 31, 2024.

      PARTNERSHIP

      On September 26, 2024, Precision formed a strategic Partnership with two Indigenous partners to provide well servicing operations in northeast British Columbia. Precision contributed $4 million in assets to the Partnership. Profit attributable to Non-Controlling Interests (NCI) was $0.1 million in 2024.

      Precision holds a controlling interest in the Partnership and the portions of the net earnings and equity not attributable to Precision’s controlling interest are shown separately as NCI in the Consolidated Statements of Net Earnings and Consolidated Statements of Financial Position.

      CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION AND STATEMENTS

      Certain statements contained in this release, including statements that contain words such as “could”, “should”, “can”, “anticipate”, “estimate”, “intend”, “plan”, “expect”, “believe”, “will”, “may”, “continue”, “project”, “potential” and similar expressions and statements relating to matters that are not historical facts constitute “forward-looking information” within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation and “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the “safe harbor” provisions of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (collectively, “forward-looking information and statements”).

      In particular, forward-looking information and statements include, but are not limited to, the following:

      • our strategic priorities for 2025;
      • our capital expenditures, free cash flow allocation and debt reduction plans for 2025 through to 2027;
      • anticipated activity levels, demand for our drilling rigs, day rates and daily operating margins in 2025;
      • the average number of term contracts in place for 2025;
      • customer adoption of AlphaTM technologies and EverGreenTM suite of environmental solutions;
      • timing and amount of synergies realized from acquired drilling and well servicing assets; and
      • potential commercial opportunities and rig contract renewals.

      These forward-looking information and statements are based on certain assumptions and analysis made by Precision in light of our experience and our perception of historical trends, current conditions, expected future developments and other factors we believe are appropriate under the circumstances. These include, among other things:

      • our ability to react to customer spending plans as a result of changes in oil and natural gas prices;
      • the status of current negotiations with our customers and vendors;
      • customer focus on safety performance;
      • existing term contracts are neither renewed nor terminated prematurely;
      • our ability to deliver rigs to customers on a timely basis;
      • the impact of an increase/decrease in capital spending; and
      • the general stability of the economic and political environments in the jurisdictions where we operate.

      Undue reliance should not be placed on forward-looking information and statements. Whether actual results, performance or achievements will conform to our expectations and predictions is subject to a number of known and unknown risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations. Such risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to:

      • volatility in the price and demand for oil and natural gas;
      • fluctuations in the level of oil and natural gas exploration and development activities;
      • fluctuations in the demand for contract drilling, well servicing and ancillary oilfield services;
      • our customers’ inability to obtain adequate credit or financing to support their drilling and production activity;
      • changes in drilling and well servicing technology, which could reduce demand for certain rigs or put us at a competitive advantage;
      • shortages, delays and interruptions in the delivery of equipment supplies and other key inputs;
      • liquidity of the capital markets to fund customer drilling programs;
      • availability of cash flow, debt and equity sources to fund our capital and operating requirements, as needed;
      • the impact of weather and seasonal conditions on operations and facilities;
      • competitive operating risks inherent in contract drilling, well servicing and ancillary oilfield services;
      • ability to improve our rig technology to improve drilling efficiency;
      • general economic, market or business conditions;
      • the availability of qualified personnel and management;
      • a decline in our safety performance which could result in lower demand for our services;
      • changes in laws or regulations, including changes in environmental laws and regulations such as increased regulation of hydraulic fracturing or restrictions on the burning of fossil fuels and greenhouse gas emissions, which could have an adverse impact on the demand for oil and natural gas;
      • terrorism, social, civil and political unrest in the foreign jurisdictions where we operate;
      • fluctuations in foreign exchange, interest rates and tax rates; and
      • other unforeseen conditions which could impact the use of services supplied by Precision and Precision’s ability to respond to such conditions.

      Readers are cautioned that the forgoing list of risk factors is not exhaustive. Additional information on these and other factors that could affect our business, operations or financial results are included in reports on file with applicable securities regulatory authorities, including but not limited to Precision’s Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2023, which may be accessed on Precision’s SEDAR+ profile at www.sedarplus.ca or under Precision’s EDGAR profile at www.sec.gov. The forward-looking information and statements contained in this release are made as of the date hereof and Precision undertakes no obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements or information, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law.

      CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION (UNAUDITED)

      (Stated in thousands of Canadian dollars)   December 31,
      2024
          December 31,
      2023(1)
          January 1,
      2023(1)
       
      ASSETS            
      Current assets:                  
      Cash   $ 73,771     $ 54,182     $ 21,587  
      Accounts receivable     378,712       421,427       413,925  
      Inventory     43,300       35,272       35,158  
      Assets held for sale     5,501       —       —  
      Total current assets     501,284       510,881       470,670  
      Non-current assets:                  
      Income tax recoverable     —       682       1,602  
      Deferred tax assets     6,559       73,662       455  
      Property, plant and equipment     2,356,173       2,338,088       2,303,338  
      Intangibles     12,997       17,310       19,575  
      Right-of-use assets     66,032       63,438       60,032  
      Finance lease receivables     4,806       5,003       —  
      Investments and other assets     8,464       9,971       20,451  
      Total non-current assets     2,455,031       2,508,154       2,405,453  
      Total assets   $ 2,956,315     $ 3,019,035     $ 2,876,123  
                         
      LIABILITIES AND EQUITY                  
      Current liabilities:                  
      Accounts payable and accrued liabilities   $ 314,355     $ 350,749     $ 404,350  
      Income taxes payable     3,778       3,026       2,991  
      Current portion of lease obligations     20,559       17,386       12,698  
      Current portion of long-term debt     —       2,848       2,287  
      Total current liabilities     338,692       374,009       422,326  
                         
      Non-current liabilities:                  
      Share-based compensation     13,666       16,755       47,836  
      Provisions and other     7,472       7,140       7,538  
      Lease obligations     54,566       57,124       52,978  
      Long-term debt     812,469       914,830       1,085,970  
      Deferred tax liabilities     47,451       73,515       28,946  
      Total non-current liabilities     935,624       1,069,364       1,223,268  
      Equity:                  
      Shareholders’ capital     2,301,729       2,365,129       2,299,533  
      Contributed surplus     77,557       75,086       72,555  
      Deficit     (900,834 )     (1,012,029 )     (1,301,273 )
      Accumulated other comprehensive income     199,020       147,476       159,714  
      Total equity attributable to shareholders     1,677,472       1,575,662       1,230,529  
      Non-controlling interest     4,527       —       —  
      Total equity     1,681,999       1,575,662       1,230,529  
      Total liabilities and equity   $ 2,956,315     $ 3,019,035     $ 2,876,123  

      (1) Comparative period figures were restated due to a change in accounting policy. See “CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING POLICY.”

      CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF NET EARNINGS (UNAUDITED)

          Three Months Ended December 31,     Year Ended December 31,  
      (Stated in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts)   2024     2023     2024     2023  
                               
                               
      Revenue   $ 468,171     $ 506,871     $ 1,902,328     $ 1,937,854  
      Expenses:                        
      Operating     312,303       316,509       1,248,686       1,204,548  
      General and administrative     35,342       39,131       132,421       122,188  
      Earnings before income taxes, loss on investments and
      other assets, gain on acquisition, gain on repurchase
      of unsecured senior notes, finance charges, foreign
      exchange, loss on asset decommissioning, gain on
      asset disposals, and depreciation and amortization
          120,526       151,231       521,221       611,118  
      Depreciation and amortization     82,210       78,734       309,314       297,557  
      Gain on asset disposals     (1,913 )     (8,883 )     (16,148 )     (24,469 )
      Loss on asset decommissioning     —       9,592       —       9,592  
      Foreign exchange     1,487       (773 )     2,259       (1,667 )
      Finance charges     16,281       19,468       69,753       83,414  
      Gain on repurchase of unsecured senior notes     —       —       —       (137 )
      Gain on acquisition     —       (25,761 )     —       (25,761 )
      Loss on investments and other assets     1,814       735       1,484       6,810  
      Earnings before income taxes     20,647       78,119       154,559       265,779  
      Income taxes:                        
      Current     2,811       486       7,470       4,494  
      Deferred     2,906       (69,089 )     35,759       (27,959 )
            5,717       (68,603 )     43,229       (23,465 )
      Net earnings   $ 14,930     $ 146,722     $ 111,330     $ 289,244  
      Attributable to:                        
      Shareholders of Precision Drilling Corporation   $ 14,795     $ 146,722     $ 111,195     $ 289,244  
      Non-controlling interests   $ 135     $ —     $ 135     $ —  
      Net earnings per share attributable to
      shareholders:
                             
      Basic   $ 1.06     $ 10.42     $ 7.81     $ 21.03  
      Diluted   $ 1.06     $ 9.81     $ 7.81     $ 19.53  


      CONDENSED
      INTERIM CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (UNAUDITED)

          Three Months Ended December 31,     Year Ended December 31,  
      (Stated in thousands of Canadian dollars)   2024     2023     2024     2023  
      Net earnings   $ 14,930     $ 146,722     $ 111,330     $ 289,244  
      Unrealized gain (loss) on translation of assets and liabilities of operations denominated in foreign currency     89,412       (36,755 )     119,821       (33,433 )
      Foreign exchange gain (loss) on net investment hedge with U.S. denominated debt     (49,744 )     22,679       (69,027 )     21,195  
      Tax related to net investment hedge of long-term debt     750       —       750       —  
      Comprehensive income   $ 55,348     $ 132,646     $ 162,874     $ 277,006  
      Attributable to:                        
      Shareholders of Precision Drilling Corporation   $ 55,213     $ 132,646     $ 162,739     $ 277,006  
      Non-controlling interests   $ 135     $ —     $ 135     $ —  


      CONDENSED
      INTERIM CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)

          Three Months Ended December 31,     Year Ended December 31,  
      (Stated in thousands of Canadian dollars)   2024     2023     2024     2023  
      Cash provided by (used in):                        
      Operations:                        
      Net earnings   $ 14,930     $ 146,722     $ 111,330     $ 289,244  
      Adjustments for:                        
      Long-term compensation plans     4,398       (2,541 )     18,888       6,659  
      Depreciation and amortization     82,210       78,734       309,314       297,557  
      Gain on asset disposals     (1,913 )     (8,883 )     (16,148 )     (24,469 )
      Loss on asset decommissioning     —       9,592       —       9,592  
      Foreign exchange     1,477       (853 )     2,442       (866 )
      Finance charges     16,281       19,468       69,753       83,414  
      Income taxes     5,717       (68,603 )     43,229       (23,465 )
      Other     (392 )     (9 )     (272 )     (229 )
      Loss on investments and other assets     1,814       735       1,484       6,810  
      Gain on acquisition     —       (25,761 )     —       (25,761 )
      Gain on repurchase of unsecured senior notes     —       —       —       (137 )
      Income taxes paid     (1,617 )     (708 )     (6,459 )     (3,103 )
      Income taxes recovered     27       17       85       24  
      Interest paid     (2,806 )     (3,335 )     (72,241 )     (83,037 )
      Interest received     409       614       1,967       1,176  
      Funds provided by operations     120,535       145,189       463,372       533,409  
      Changes in non-cash working capital balances     42,256       25,066       18,711       (32,838 )
      Cash provided by operations     162,791       170,255       482,083       500,571  
                               
      Investments:                        
      Purchase of property, plant and equipment     (58,900 )     (78,582 )     (216,647 )     (224,960 )
      Purchase of intangibles     —       (265 )     (51 )     (1,789 )
      Proceeds on sale of property, plant and equipment     8,570       3,117       30,395       23,841  
      Proceeds from sale of investments and other assets     —       —       3,623       10,013  
      Business acquisitions     —       (646 )     —       (28,646 )
      Purchase of investments and other assets     (718 )     (61 )     (725 )     (5,343 )
      Receipt of finance lease payments     208       191       799       255  
      Changes in non-cash working capital balances     (11,114 )     18,619       (20,380 )     11,845  
      Cash used in investing activities     (61,954 )     (57,627 )     (202,986 )     (214,784 )
                               
      Financing:                        
      Issuance of long-term debt     17,078       —       27,978       162,649  
      Repayments of long-term debt     (41,813 )     (86,699 )     (204,319 )     (375,237 )
      Repurchase of share capital     (25,023 )     (17,004 )     (75,488 )     (29,955 )
      Issuance of common shares from the exercise of options     —       —       686       —  
      Debt amendment fees     (46 )     —       (1,363 )     —  
      Lease payments     (3,266 )     (3,010 )     (13,271 )     (9,423 )
      Funding from non-controlling interest     —       —       4,392       —  
      Cash used in financing activities     (53,070 )     (106,713 )     (261,385 )     (251,966 )
      Effect of exchange rate changes on cash     1,700       (798 )     1,877       (1,226 )
      Increase in cash     49,467       5,117       19,589       32,595  
      Cash, beginning of period     24,304       49,065       54,182       21,587  
      Cash, end of period   $ 73,771     $ 54,182     $ 73,771     $ 54,182  


      CONDENSED
      INTERIM CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY (UNAUDITED)

          Attributable to shareholders of the Corporation              
      (Stated in thousands of Canadian dollars)   Shareholders’
      Capital
          Contributed
      Surplus
          Accumulated
      Other
      Comprehensive
      Income
          Deficit     Total     Non-
      controlling
      interest
          Total
      Equity
       
      Balance at January 1, 2024   $ 2,365,129     $ 75,086     $ 147,476     $ (1,012,029 )   $ 1,575,662     $ —     $ 1,575,662  
      Net earnings for the period     —       —       —       111,195       111,195       135       111,330  
      Other comprehensive income for the period     —       —       51,544       —       51,544       —       51,544  
      Share options exercised     978       (292 )     —       —       686       —       686  
      Settlement of Executive Performance and Restricted Share Units     21,846       (1,479 )     —       —       20,367       —       20,367  
      Share repurchases     (86,570 )     —       —       —       (86,570 )     —       (86,570 )
      Redemption of non-management directors share units     346       (346 )     —       —       —       —       —  
      Share-based compensation expense     —       4,588       —       —       4,588       —       4,588  
      Funding from non-controlling interest     —       —       —       —       —       4,392       4,392  
      Balance at December 31, 2024   $ 2,301,729     $ 77,557     $ 199,020     $ (900,834 )   $ 1,677,472     $ 4,527     $ 1,681,999  
          Attributable to shareholders of the Corporation              
      (Stated in thousands of Canadian dollars)   Shareholders’
      Capital
          Contributed
      Surplus
          Accumulated
      Other
      Comprehensive
      Income
          Deficit     Total     Non-
      controlling
      interest
          Total
      Equity
       
      Balance at January 1, 2023   $ 2,299,533     $ 72,555     $ 159,714     $ (1,301,273 )   $ 1,230,529     $ —     $ 1,230,529  
      Net earnings for the period     —       —       —       289,244       289,244       —       289,244  
      Other comprehensive income for the period     —       —       (12,238 )     —       (12,238 )     —       (12,238 )
      Acquisition share consideration     75,588       —       —       —       75,588       —       75,588  
      Settlement of Executive Performance and Restricted Share Units     19,206       —       —       —       19,206       —       19,206  
      Share repurchases     (29,955 )     —       —       —       (29,955 )     —       (29,955 )
      Redemption of non-management directors share units     757       —       —       —       757       —       757  
      Share-based compensation expense     —       2,531       —       —       2,531       —       2,531  
      Balance at December 31, 2023   $ 2,365,129     $ 75,086     $ 147,476     $ (1,012,029 )   $ 1,575,662     $ —     $ 1,575,662  


      2024 FOURTH QUARTER AND YEAR-END RESULTS CONFERENCE CALL AND WEBCAST

      Precision Drilling Corporation has scheduled a conference call and webcast to begin promptly at 11:00 a.m. MT (1:00 p.m. ET) on Thursday, February 13, 2025.

      To participate in the conference call please register at the URL link below. Once registered, you will receive a dial-in number and a unique PIN, which will allow you to ask questions.

      https://register.vevent.com/register/BI9168b4c0516f4409ab4f297340994ebc

      The call will also be webcast and can be accessed through the link below. A replay of the webcast call will be available on Precision’s website for 12 months.

      https://edge.media-server.com/mmc/p/8hij84aa

      About Precision

      Precision is a leading provider of safe and environmentally responsible High Performance, High Value services to the energy industry, offering customers access to an extensive fleet of Super Series drilling rigs. Precision has commercialized an industry-leading digital technology portfolio known as Alpha™ that utilizes advanced automation software and analytics to generate efficient, predictable, and repeatable results for energy customers. Our drilling services are enhanced by our EverGreen™ suite of environmental solutions, which bolsters our commitment to reducing the environmental impact of our operations. Additionally, Precision offers well service rigs, camps and rental equipment all backed by a comprehensive mix of technical support services and skilled, experienced personnel.

      Precision is headquartered in Calgary, Alberta, Canada and is listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the trading symbol “PD” and on the New York Stock Exchange under the trading symbol “PDS”.

      Additional Information

      For further information, please contact:

      Lavonne Zdunich, CPA, CA
      Vice President, Investor Relations
      403.716.4500

      800, 525 – 8th Avenue S.W.
      Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2P 1G1
      Website: www.precisiondrilling.com

      The MIL Network –

    February 13, 2025
  • MIL-Evening Report: ‘It’s a house battery you can drive around’ – how a handful of Australians are selling power back to the grid from their cars

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Scott Dwyer, Research Director, Energy Futures, University of Technology Sydney

    24K-Productions

    Our cars sit unused most of the time. If you have an electric vehicle, you might leave it charging at home or work after driving it. But there’s another step you could take. If you have a bidirectional charger, you can set it to sell power back to the grid when demand is high.

    Fewer than ten people across Australia actually do this, because the technology – known as Vehicle-to-Grid (V2G) – is very new. To date, it only works with a single car model (Nissan LEAF) and a single charger (Wallbox Quasar 1). We’ve estimated the number of users based on sales of this charger. The chargers are expensive and there’s a thicket of regulations to navigate.

    But that could soon change. Last year, Climate Change Minister Chris Bowen announced new Australian standards and communications protocols for bidirectional chargers in a bid to make it mainstream. Cheaper EVs and bidirectional chargers will make this more appealing.

    If it takes off, V2G could become extremely useful to the power grid as a way to release power as required and stabilise the grid against fluctuations.

    This week, Australia’s renewable energy agency released a V2G roadmap, which notes widespread uptake could “materially reduce electricity costs for consumers and accelerate national emissions reduction”.

    To understand why people are using the technology and the challenges to do so, we interviewed five early adopters from New South Wales and South Australia. Our findings are released today.

    A bidirectional charger is necessary to sell power back to the grid.
    doublelee/Shutterstock

    Setting up V2G isn’t easy

    Our interviewees reported a long, complex journey to set up V2G. These early adopters had no playbook to follow, so the process was one of trial and error.

    Some relied on professional networks or social media groups to gather information. They spent significant time and energy finding electricians, installers and charger manufacturers to set up their systems. Strata approvals were required. They also had to negotiate with power retailers and distributors.

    Delays were common, especially when seeking approval from the energy distributor. Some interviewees reported delays of months to years.

    Most interviewees had experience in a technical field such as engineering or technology. Some reported a significant learning curve, while others using new software from their retailer reported a smoother “set and forget” process.

    So why do it? Our interviewees had several reasons, ranging from getting the most out of expensive assets (solar and the EV) to offsetting power bills entirely.

    Four out of five interviewees reported making a small profit of about A$1,000 annually instead of a bill. Many wanted to be able to reduce dependence on the grid and reduce their environmental impact.

    As one told us:

    you originally think of it as a car you can also use to power your house. [But actually] it’s a house battery you can drive around.

    Maximising savings

    Typically, our interviewees plugged their car in at home during the day to charge from their rooftop solar. In the evenings when power prices peaked, they used an app to sell power back to the grid. This maximised their cost savings for charging the car battery and their earnings from the grid.

    For instance, a V2G user was alerted by their energy retailer that power prices had spiked to over $20 per kilowatt hour – far above normal rates of 25–45 cents. They immediately set their car and home battery to sell power back to the grid. In two hours, they sold 28 kilowatt hours of power to the grid and made more than $560. As they told us: “I look forward to more such events.”

    Our interviewees often monitored energy prices, solar output and car battery levels to optimise their output. To avoid their EV battery getting too low, they set a lower limit – say 30% of charge – after which their car would stop exporting power.

    This photo shows the setup of one of our early adopter interviewees. Pictured is the Nissan LEAF and bidirectional charger. For years, this has been the only car model compatible with vehicle to grid, but this is set to change.
    Author provided, CC BY-NC-ND

    Is there a downside?

    One of the main reasons people are sceptical of V2G is due to concern about accelerated degradation of the battery.

    This is a common concern. But to date, there’s no consensus showing V2G shortens the battery life of EVs significantly. One recent study shows it increases degradation by 0.3% a year. But another showed V2G might actually extend battery life in some scenarios.

    Last year, we surveyed more than 1,300 members of a motoring organisation about their view of V2G technology. We found battery warranty was a bigger concern than battery life. This is because most EV manufacturers other than Nissan don’t mention V2G in their battery warranties, leading drivers to believe they might void their warranty by using V2G.

    Awareness of V2G technology is growing. The survey also found almost 40% of respondents were very or somewhat familiar with V2G, a jump from the 17% who reported familiarity in 2022. Among EV owners, almost 90% reported knowledge of the concept.

    Moving beyond early adopters

    For V2G to go mainstream, the process must be much simpler, cheaper and easier to set up.

    To accelerate uptake, reliable, accessible information is essential.

    Expanding government incentive programs to include bidirectional chargers would cut the upfront cost and make it more accessible.

    Even within the EV supply chain, knowledge of V2G is limited. Car dealerships will need to know which models work with V2G.

    Electricians may need specific training to install and maintain these chargers.

    EVs are falling in price as manufacturers vie for market share and cheaper options become available. V2G capabilities might help boost sales for competing car companies.

    As more motorists switch to EVs, interest in V2G will increase. While V2G can boost the appeal of EVs, there are others, such as Vehicle-to-Home (using your car to power your home during blackouts or to save money) and Vehicle-to-Load (using your EV to run power tools or appliances).

    Each of these can help consumers get more value from the vehicles parked in driveways and garages.

    Scott Dwyer receives funding from iMOVE Australia Cooperative Research Centre and the NRMA for this project.

    Scott Dwyer receives funding from iMOVE Australia Cooperative Research Centre and the NRMA for this project.

    Kriti Nagrath receives funding from iMOVE Australia Cooperative Research Centre and the NRMA for this project.

    – ref. ‘It’s a house battery you can drive around’ – how a handful of Australians are selling power back to the grid from their cars – https://theconversation.com/its-a-house-battery-you-can-drive-around-how-a-handful-of-australians-are-selling-power-back-to-the-grid-from-their-cars-249696

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

    February 13, 2025
  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: New industry bonus opens to support good jobs and low carbon manufacturing factories

    Source: United Kingdom – Government Statements

    Industrial heartlands and coastal areas will receive a major economic boost as the government backs renewable energy firms investing in industrial communities.

    • Government launches new investment to support clean energy manufacturing, and highly skilled jobs in industrial towns and cities
    • offshore wind developers can now bid for financial support if they drive investment in UK’s most deprived regions, build low carbon factories, or support net zero supply chains
    • the bonus will kickstart growth and support good jobs – delivering the mission to become a clean energy superpower through the government’s Plan for Change

    Industrial heartlands and coastal areas will receive a major economic boost as the government backs renewable energy firms investing in industrial communities – backing good jobs through the government’s Plan for Change. 

    The application window has opened for the Clean Industry Bonus, which provides financial support for offshore wind developers, on the condition they prioritise their investment in areas that need it most, including traditional oil and gas communities – supporting highly skilled jobs such as engineers, electricians or welders.

    The support also rewards developers who build more sustainable low carbon factories, offshore wind blades, cables and ports to reduce industrial emissions across the clean energy supply chain.

    By encouraging developers to use less polluting suppliers, the bonus will help tackle the climate crisis while also addressing supply chain blockages in renewable technologies driven by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine – supporting industry on the transition to clean, secure, homegrown energy that Britain controls.

    The UK produces more offshore wind than any other European country, making it the backbone for plans to deliver a clean power system by 2030 and become a clean energy superpower. This bonus will help accelerate the drive for clean power – incentivising developers to build the infrastructure the country needs to end reliance on unstable fossil fuel markets and help keep energy bills down for good.   

    Since July, the government has seen £34.8 billion of private investment into UK’s clean energy industries. In November, the government launched its carbon capture and storage industry supporting 4,000 jobs in the North West and Teesside. ScottishPower awarded a £1 billion turbine contract for its East Anglia TWO offshore windfarm to Siemens Gamesa, including blade production at its Hull blade factory – the company employ over 1,300 people in Humberside.

    Energy Secretary Ed Miliband said:   

    We are backing our proud manufacturing, coastal and oil and gas communities with good jobs, skills and private sector investment – delivering on the government’s Plan for Change.

    This is our clean energy superpower mission in action, kickstarting growth, delivering energy security and transforming towns and cities as part of the transition – from the ports of Nigg and Leith to the manufacturing hubs of Blyth and Hull. 

    Steve Foxley, Chief Executive of the Offshore Renewable Energy (ORE) Catapult, said: 

    This news is an important signal from government to industry of intent to grow our offshore wind sector in a way that benefits both our climate and our economy, supporting expansive regional job creation and bolstering national energy security.  

    Alongside innovating to develop next-generation technologies, delivering the right levels of future deployment and fulfilling the ambitions of the Industrial Growth Plan for offshore wind, it will drive up confidence in our ability to secure the clean investments we need in the years to come.

    Dan McGrail, CEO of RenewableUK, said:  

    The offshore wind industry already employs over 34,000 people in the UK, but there’s an opportunity to treble this number by the end of the decade if we grow the sector’s supply chain. Government initiatives like the Clean Industry Bonus, coupled with industry initiatives to support innovation and the upcoming Industrial Strategy, could drive hundreds of millions of pounds of private investment into new manufacturing. 

    Whilst we’re right to focus on securing investment in manufacturing new turbine foundations, blades and cables, we shouldn’t forget that there are also thousands of jobs in the construction and maintenance of wind farms too. You can go to places across the country like Grimsby and Great Yarmouth and Buckie on the Moray Firth and see boats full of engineers ensuring our wind farms operate at maximum efficiency. 

    Dhara Vyas, Energy UK, Chief Executive, said:  

    Offshore wind is set to become the backbone of a decarbonised power system. To build an industry that is resilient to supply chain challenges, we need a framework that supports sustainable deployment, while fostering investment in the UK’s industrial heartlands. 

    The Clean Industry Bonus will help to unlock economic growth, create job opportunities, and maintain the UK’s position as a global leader in offshore wind. 

    Alongside the development of a broader industrial strategy, the Clean Industry Bonus will play an important role in strengthening the Contracts for Difference mechanism. Clarity will be critical in ensuring we can deliver Allocation Round 7, which is likely to be the single most important auction to achieving the Clean Power goal.

    The UK is already home to the world’s first floating offshore wind farm and has the highest deployment of offshore wind in Europe. As a result, the UK’s offshore wind industry is supporting thousands of highly skilled jobs across the country. 

    This latest boost for renewable developers comes after the government delivered the most successful renewables auction round in history last year, securing contracts for Europe’s largest and second largest offshore wind farm projects. 

    The bonus will come with an initial £27 million per gigawatt of offshore wind projects. That means if developers commit to 7-8 GW of offshore wind, up to £200 million of funding could be made available. 

    Funding will be allocated competitively with the results announced by the Energy Secretary in the summer.

    Notes to editors

    The Clean Industry Bonus will apply to all offshore wind projects bidding for funding through this year’s renewable energy auction, Allocation Round 7 of the Contracts for Difference scheme, which is the main mechanism for securing clean energy infrastructure for Britain. September’s auction secured 5 GW for offshore wind, enough to power the equivalent of around 8 million homes.

    The funding will come through the government’s Contract for Difference mechanism. The scheme is designed to protect billpayers from high costs with the lowest price bids successful, ensuring value for money.

    Share this page

    The following links open in a new tab

    • Share on Facebook (opens in new tab)
    • Share on Twitter (opens in new tab)

    Updates to this page

    Published 13 February 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom –

    February 13, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Symposium Generates Connections and Strategies for Rural ND Communities

    Source: US State of North Dakota

     Energy was high as over 100 attendees filled the North Dakota State Museum and Heritage Center auditorium for the inaugural North Dakota Rural Planning Symposium. 

    “Rural North Dakota is evolving, and planning is key to ensuring communities remain vibrant and sustainable,” says Commerce Commissioner Chris Schilken. “Events like this help our rural community developers connect, share ideas, and move us forward in continuing to build strong, resilient towns throughout the state.”

    The rural community planning event, hosted by the Commerce Office of Community Development & Rural Prosperity, drew community developers, policymakers, and industry leaders from all corners of the state, with all eight regions represented. 

    “Ellendale is adapting to changing economic and demographic conditions through innovative solutions,” said Nicole Kempf, City Auditor. “The growth and prosperity opportunities in collaboration with Applied Digital has assisted with housing efforts and are creating positive changes in our community. It was inspiring to hear the actionable solutions shared today, and I’m eager to implement them in Ellendale.” 

    Following a social event the evening prior, the symposium kicked off with a brief presentation by international speaker Becky McCray, Rural Development Expert and Co-Founder of SAVEYOUR.town. 

    “North Dakota communities possess a remarkable sense of identity,” McCray observed. “Their strong community spirit and love for the outdoors are invaluable assets. Many communities are actively leveraging these strengths, while also fostering strong collaborations with neighboring towns.”

    The event continued with discussions on rural development funding opportunities, mobilizing volunteers and advocates, and a workshop on building idea-friendly communities 

    For more information on the Commerce Office of Community Development & Rural Prosperity, visit Community Development and Rural Prosperity.  

    MIL OSI USA News –

    February 13, 2025
  • MIL-OSI United Nations: United nations Pavilion at Expo 2025 Osaka, Kansai: 35 UN entities, 15 Secretariat Departments, Offices to Gather under Theme “United for a Better Future”

    Source: United Nations General Assembly and Security Council

    Two months from today, the United Nations will welcome visitors to a dedicated pavilion in the Empowering Zone of Expo 2025 in Osaka, Kansai, Japan under the theme “United for a Better Future”.  The United Nations Pavilion is proud to host exhibits and programming that represent the work of 35 UN entities and 15 UN Secretariat departments and offices.

    The United Nations pavilion will feature highlights of eight decades of impact, current efforts to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), and to address global challenges and humanitarian crises, as well as a vision of a sustainable future that is possible only through collective action and multilateral collaboration.  The UN Pavilion will also host special weekly exhibits and events aligned with the Expo’s theme weeks, United Nations international days and other priorities to promote sustainable development, human rights, climate action and peace and security.  Visitors can also purchase UN and SDG-related merchandise at the giftshop located inside the pavilion.

    Confirmed participating UN entities include:

    • United Nations Secretariat
      • Department of Global Communications
      • Department of Economic and Social Affairs
      • Department of Peace Operations
      • Department of Political and Peacebuilding Affairs
      • Development Coordination Office
      • Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs
      • Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR)
      • United Nations Global Compact Office
      • United Nations Mine Action Service
      • United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs
      • United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction
      • United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC)
      • United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs
      • United Nations Road Safety Fund / Special Envoy for Road Safety
      • United Nations Youth Office
    • Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
    • International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
    • International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO)
    • International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD)
    • International Labour Organization (ILO)
    • International Maritime Organization (IMO)
    • International Organization for Migration (IOM)
    • International Telecommunication Union (ITU)
    • International Trade Centre (ITC)
    • Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS)
    • United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR)
    • Secretariat of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change
    • Statistical Institute for Asia and the Pacific)
    • United Nations Capital Development Fund (UNCDF)
    • United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF)
    • United Nations Development Programme
    • United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO)
    • United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women (UN-Women)
    • United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)
    • United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat)
    • United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO)
    • United Nations Institute for Training and Research (UNITAR)
    • United Nations Office for Project Services (UNOPS)
    • United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA)
    • United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA)
    • United Nations Research Institute for Social Development (UNRISD)
    • United Nations University (UNU)
    • United Nations Volunteers programme (UNV)
    • United Nations Water*
    • Universal Postal Union (UPU)
    • World Tourism Organization (UN Tourism)
    • World Food Programme (WFP)
    • World Health Organization (WHO)
    • World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)

    The UN Pavilion will also host prominent guest speakers, including senior UN officials, leading experts, celebrities and advocates, who will share their insights and experiences on global challenges and solutions.

    “In the year that the United Nations will turn 80 years old, the UN Pavilion presents key milestones since 1945 that have reshaped values and the world as we know it.  We will also showcase examples of the UN in our daily lives and a vision of a world in which everyone thrives in peace, dignity and equality on a healthy planet,” said Maher Nasser, Commissioner-General of the United Nations at Expo 2025.  “It is our hope that our pavilion will serve as a dynamic platform for learning, collaboration and inspiration for action.” 

    The video interview of Mr. Nasser is available at www.youtube.com/watch?v=5MBS_DOB_k8.

    Expo 2025 Osaka, Kansai, will run from 13 April to 13 October and is expected to attract over 28 million visitors.  The UN Pavilion will be open every day from 9:30 a.m. to 9 p.m.

    For additional information about the United Nations presence at Expo 2025 in Osaka, Kansai, Japan, please contact Naomi Ichikawa, UN Department of Global Communications (New York), at email:  nichikawa@un.org.

    __________

    * UN Water is a coordination mechanism, comprising United Nations entities (members) and international organizations (partners) working on water and sanitation issues.

    MIL OSI United Nations News –

    February 13, 2025
  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Greenpeace projections blanket city days before trial of the $300M lawsuit filed by Dallas-based Energy Transfer

    Source: Greenpeace Statement –

    Greenpeace USA brought a powerful visual campaign to the streets of Dallas, projecting messages around Dallas to highlight the growing threat to free speech and peaceful protest. The projections come just days before Dallas-based Energy Transfer’s $300 million lawsuit against Greenpeace USA and Greenpeace International is set to go to trial. The February 24th trial represents a blatant attempt to silence dissent and intimidate those who fight for climate justic
    © Greenpeace

    DALLAS, TX (February 12, 2024) – In response to the growing threat against free speech and peaceful protest, last night, Greenpeace USA lit up Dallas with bold projections of resistance and solidarity onto iconic city locations. The projections come just days before the $300 million lawsuit brought by Dallas-based Energy Transfer (ET) against Greenpeace USA and Greenpeace International is set to go to trial. 

    Photos and videos from the projections are available here.

    Rolf Skar, Greenpeace USA Campaigns Director, said: “This fight is bigger than Greenpeace. This lawsuit is a blatant attempt to silence critics and hide destructive practices. Standing up to corporate bullies like Energy Transfer requires courage, solidarity, and people power – things no courtroom or judgment can erase. These projections are a testament to that resilience, shining a light on the truth and reminding everyone fighting for a just and livable future that we will not back down.”

    The Energy Transfer case, set to go to trial February 24th is a classic example of a SLAPP lawsuit – not filed to rectify a legitimate grievance but to silence dissent and intimidate those fighting for climate justice. This lawsuit makes outrageous allegations that have far-reaching implications for organizations far beyond Greenpeace.. However, as everyone saw last night: #WeWillNotBeSilenced.


    Contact: Madison Carter, Greenpeace USA Senior Communications Specialist, [email protected]

    Greenpeace USA is part of a global network of independent campaigning organizations that use peaceful protest and creative communication to expose global environmental problems and promote solutions that are essential to a green and peaceful future. Greenpeace USA is committed to transforming the country’s unjust social, environmental, and economic systems from the ground up to address the climate crisis, advance racial justice, and build an economy that puts people first. Learn more at www.greenpeace.org/usa.

    MIL OSI NGO –

    February 13, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: $150M for Climate Resiliency on SUNY & CUNY Campuses

    Source: US State of New York

    Governor Kathy Hochul today announced $150 million in climate resiliency grants  to make New York State’s public college campuses greener, more resilient to severe weather and more energy efficient. Supported by funding from the $4.2 billion Clean Water, Clean Air and Green Jobs Environmental Bond Act of 2022, the State University of New York (SUNY) is receiving $100 million for clean energy projects, including the installation of a thermal energy network at SUNY Buffalo, and the City University of New York (CUNY) is receiving $50 million for solar, energy storage, and heat pump projects on three campuses as part of a comprehensive plan to reduce CUNY’s carbon footprint.

    “New York’s higher education institutions play a significant role in leading by example to help advance a cleaner, greener future,” Governor Hochul said. “The $150 million in new investments from the Environmental Bond Act will allow SUNY and CUNY to take a significant step forward in electrifying campuses and integrating cleaner energy solutions to reduce pollution and help New York’s colleges become more energy efficient.”

    SUNY projects funded by the Environmental Bond Act include:

    Binghamton University: Binghamton University will install thermal energy networks and building heat pump technology on its campus. The funding will help implement construction of new high-efficiency networked water source heat pump systems in select buildings currently operating on approximately 20-year-old, lower-efficiency chillers. The new systems will effectively lower energy use by 45 percent, operating costs by $300,000, greenhouse gases by 1,100 metric tons (based on current grid emission factors), and other pollutants for the benefit of the campus and the larger community.

    University at Buffalo: UB will construct the first of many energy hubs, all of which are needed to phase out fossil fuel-based systems and replace aging, lower efficiency systems with on-site electrical systems that lower greenhouse gas and other pollutants and improve operating efficiencies. This first high-efficiency energy hub will service a network of up to five buildings on UB’s South Campus.

    SUNY Oswego: The campus will construct a geoexchange field system for a geothermal network to improve operating efficiencies, lower operating costs, and reduce greenhouse gas and other pollutants for the benefit of the campus and larger community. The project will result in an extensive underground utility infrastructure and central plant and building-level equipment conversions, which are required to continue converting the campus plant to sustainable measures.

    Stony Brook University: The Environmental Bond Act investment will provide design and construction for multiple ground and rooftop solar voltaic (PV) arrays to improve community air quality and public health and decarbonize the Long Island electric grid. The resulting on-site renewable power generation will provide operational efficiencies, energy use reduction, greenhouse gas and pollutant reductions, as well as to provide additional capacity for any potential future campus growth.

    CUNY projects funded by the Environmental Bond Act include:

    City College of New York: Parking lot solar canopies on the south campus will be paired with battery storage, which will support flexible demand management and electric vehicle (EV) chargers will be added to help electrify campus transportation. Rooftop solar will also be deployed. Heat pumps will be installed to electrify heating and cooling for the library and other spaces in the North Academic Center, and also in the science building to heat building domestic hot water and pool water. Heat Pumps are three to four times more efficient than a boiler as they move existing heat, rather than creating heat through combustion.

    Brooklyn College: Geothermal energy will be tapped as bore holes are drilled to provide ground source renewable heating and cooling for the adjacent West End Building, which houses student clubs, the film department, a testing center, and computer labs, and is a vital hub of student activity. Rooftop solar and EV charging stations will be installed at James Hall and West Quad, promoting EV adoption while supporting the college’s fleet electrification goals.

    Hunter College: This project initiates the hydronic conversion transformation of North Hall energy systems away from inefficient steam and standalone window air conditioning. Energy efficient hot and chilled water from the central plant will replace an antiquated steam system. This step toward electrification will reduce baseload energy use and cut use of fossil fuels, ensuring a better-controlled, state-of-the-art, sustainable learning environment for students.

    SUNY Chancellor John B. King Jr. said, “With thanks to Governor Hochul, SUNY’s campuses are leading the way in advancing sustainability and addressing climate change. This Bond Act funding for four SUNY projects will help achieve New York State’s ambitious decarbonization goals and build a more sustainable future.”

    CUNY Chancellor Félix V. Matos Rodríguez said, “By helping CUNY reduce the carbon footprint of our campuses, curb our consumption of fossil fuels and harness our capacity to aid sustainable energy production, Governor Hochul is enabling the University to promote prudent environmental stewardship. The Environmental Bond Act investments announced today will help CUNY play a key role in the development of a resilient, responsible, and resourceful New York.”

    New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Interim Commissioner Sean Mahar said, “Governor Hochul’s commitment in the State of the State to advance a greener future through decarbonization is bolstered with this new $150 million Clean Water, Clean Air and Green Jobs Environmental Bond Act investment for innovative clean energy projects at SUNY and CUNY campuses across the state. Through the State’s Environmental Bond Act investments, New York is supporting advanced thermal energy networks, EV charging infrastructure, and other technologies that reduce pollution, lower operating costs, and create far-reaching benefits for schools and their surrounding communities.”

    New York League of Conservation Voters President Julie Tighe said, “As the state transitions to a clean energy economy, it is critical that the government not just pass laws, but that they also lead by example. That is exactly what Governor Hochul is doing by allocating Bond Act funds to decarbonize SUNY and CUNY campuses, including by building out thermal energy networks and investing in solar and EV charging infrastructure at some of the most polluting buildings the state owns. We applaud the Governor for reducing New York’s carbon footprint while also helping seed one of the most promising clean energy solutions we have for our large buildings and campuses.”

    Building Decarbonization Coalition New York Director Lisa Dix said, “We applaud the Governor for this critical step forward in implementing the Decarbonization Leadership Program and the SUNY and CUNY campus decarbonization action plans to advance Thermal Energy Networks across our state. This funding and continued leadership is key to getting fifteen Thermal Energy Networks, shovel-ready projects by 2026. Thermal Energy Networks will advance new economic development, modernize our universities, create union jobs, help avoid costly grid upgrades, slash pollution in our communities and help achieve New York’s climate goals – all while building a thriving clean energy economy.”

    New York State AFL-CIO President Mario Cilento said, “Thanks to Governor Hochul’s leadership, the potential of the Environmental Bond Act is now becoming a reality. These projects will be built union with robust labor standards, including prevailing rate, labor peace, and Buy American. As I said in 2022, when the delegates to the New York State AFL-CIO convention voted overwhelmingly to support the Environmental Bond Act ballot referendum, working together, we will decarbonize while establishing a solid foundation for union careers.”

    New York State Building Trades President Gary LaBarbera said, “As New York looks to progress towards its climate goals, we must continue to fund clean energy initiatives that not only modernize our key institutions but also create thousands of good-paying careers for working class people. The investments from the Environmental Bond Act will help our SUNY and CUNY campuses operate in a greener and more environmentally friendly manner, generate more accessible pathways to the middle class for hardworking New Yorkers, and contribute to improving the experiences of everyone who attends and works at these colleges. We applaud Governor Hochul for supporting this investment and look forward to playing a role in pushing these climate adaptions forward.”

    New York State continues to advance resiliency initiatives and investments that are helping to protect communities. Today’s announcement complements Governor Hochul’s Executive Budget proposal to invest more than $1 billion to help fund a more sustainable and affordable future. This ambitious proposal is the single-largest climate investment in state history, generating thousands of jobs, slashing energy bills for households, and cutting harmful pollution.

    The funding to SUNY and CUNY demonstrates the ways New York State’s continued commitment can be achieved, by deploying renewable energy, advancing clean transportation and building decarbonization, and exploring emerging technologies that can support decarbonization goals and economic development. The Executive Budget also includes $108 million for climate resiliency initiatives that support coastal resiliency and additional funding for Green Resiliency Grants and continues a record $400 million for Environmental Protection Fund programs that include measures to adapt and mitigate climate impacts. Progress also continues in administering the $4.2 billion Clean Water, Clean Air and Green Jobs Environmental Bond Act, which has allocated approximately $1.25 billion, or 25 percent, of Bond Act funds to date.

    New York State’s Climate Agenda

    New York State’s climate agenda calls for an affordable and just transition to a clean energy economy that creates family-sustaining jobs, promotes economic growth through green investments, and directs a minimum of 35 percent of the benefits to disadvantaged communities. New York is advancing a suite of efforts to achieve an emissions-free economy by 2050, including in the energy, buildings, transportation, and waste sectors.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    February 13, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. Reports 2024 Fourth-Quarter and Full-Year Financial Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    ARCHBOLD, Ohio, Feb. 12, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. (Nasdaq: FMAO) today reported financial results for the 2024 fourth quarter and twelve months ended December 31, 2024.

    2024 Fourth Quarter Financial and Operating Highlights (on a year-over-year basis unless noted):

    • 87 consecutive quarters of profitability
    • Net income increased 51.2% to $8.4 million, or $0.61 per basic and diluted share, from $5.5 million, or $0.41 per basic and diluted share
    • Asset quality remains at historically strong levels with nonperforming loans of only $3.1 million at December 31, 2024, compared to $22.4 million at December 31, 2023
    • Net charge-offs to average loans were 0.00%
    • Allowance for credit losses was 826.70% of nonperforming loans
    • Tier 1 leverage ratio was 8.12%
    • Net interest margin increased 27 basis points to 2.84%
    • Efficiency ratio improved to 59.82%, compared to 69.23% for the same period a year ago

    2024 Full-Year Financial Highlights Include (on a year-over-year basis unless noted):

    • Total loans, net were $2.56 billion at December 31, 2024, compared to $2.58 billion at December 31, 2023 and $2.54 billion at September 30, 2024
    • Total assets increased 2.5% to $3.36 billion
    • Deposits increased 3.0% to a record $2.69 billion
    • Stockholders’ equity increased 5.9% to $335.2 million
    • Net interest income after provision for credit losses increased 7.5% to $85.6 million
    • Return on average tangible equity was 8.91%
    • F&M ended 2024 with excellent liquidity levels, and over $690 million in contingent funding sources, and a cash-to-assets ratio of 5.3%, compared to 4.3% at December 31, 2023
    • Dividend raised 3.8% year-over-year, representing the 30th consecutive annual increase in the Company’s regular dividend payment since 1994

    Lars B. Eller, President and Chief Executive Officer, stated, “Our strong 2024 financial performance reflects solid execution of our multi-year strategic plan, as we have remained focused on continual improvements, managing the items under our control, and providing our customers and communities with outstanding, and local financial services. Thanks to the unwavering dedication of our team and the trust of our customers, F&M’s financial and operating results strengthened throughout 2024. This performance creates a solid foundation and further solidifies F&M’s position as a leading community bank in the Ohio, Indiana and Michigan markets we serve.”

    Mr. Eller continued, “Strong earnings growth in 2024 was driven by the success of ongoing strategies aimed at expanding our net interest margin, maintaining excellent asset quality, and driving efficiencies across our business. Core earnings for the 2024 fourth quarter were strong as net interest income after provision for credit losses increased 16.1% year-over-year to a quarterly record of $22.6 million, and noninterest income expanded 4.1% year-over-year to $4.0 million. We believe these trends highlight the improvements we have made to profitability, and we expect these trends to continue in the second half 2025.”

    Income Statement
    Net income for the 2024 fourth quarter ended December 31, 2024, was $8.4 million, compared to $5.5 million for the same period last year. Net income per basic and diluted share for the 2024 fourth quarter was $0.61, compared to $0.41 for the same period last year. Net income for the 2024 twelve months ended December 31, 2024, was $25.9 million, compared to $22.8 million for the same period last year. Net income per basic and diluted share for the 2024 twelve months was $1.90, compared to $1.67 for the same period last year.

    Deposits
    At December 31, 2024, total deposits were a record $2.69 billion, an increase of 3.0% from December 31, 2023. The Company’s cost of interest-bearing liabilities was 3.01% for the quarter ended December 31, 2024, compared to 3.02% for the quarter ended December 31, 2023. For the 2024 twelve months ended December 31, 2024, F&M’s cost of interest-bearing liabilities was 3.12%, compared to 2.53% in the prior year reflecting the higher rate environment and growth in interest-bearing checking and savings accounts.  

    Mr. Eller commented, “Throughout 2024, we pursued strategies aimed at optimizing our deposit base and growing low-cost checking (DDA) deposits. Since the beginning of 2024, we added nearly 7,500 new checking accounts, and benefited from new and expanded relationships at offices that were opened in 2023. As a result, we ended 2024 with a loan-to-deposit ratio of 94.4%, compared to 98.0% at December 31, 2023.”

    Loan Portfolio and Asset Quality
    “While the demand for loans is high across our markets, our approach to risk and pricing remains prudent. This strategy has contributed to historically strong asset quality over the past two quarters and is a testament to F&M’s risk, lending, and compliance capabilities and high-performing teams.   We expect loan growth to increase modestly in 2025, with growth weighted in the back half of the year. In addition, 31.4% of our loan portfolio is subject to reprice in the next 12 months. We believe these favorable trends will contribute to higher net interest income in 2025,” continued Mr. Eller.

    Total loans, net at December 31, 2024, decreased 0.7%, or by $19.3 million to $2.56 billion, compared to $2.58 billion at December 31, 2023. The year-over-year decline was driven primarily by lower consumer real estate, consumer, and agricultural real estate loans, partially offset primarily by higher commercial and industrial and agricultural loans. Compared to the quarter ended September 30, 2024, total loans, net at December 31, 2024 increased by 0.9% or $23.5 million.

    F&M continues to closely monitor its loan portfolio with a particular emphasis on higher risk sectors. Nonperforming loans were $3.1 million, or 0.12% of total loans at December 31, 2024, compared to $22.4 million, or 0.87% of total loans at December 31, 2023, and $2.9 million, or 0.11% at September 30, 2024.

    F&M maintains a well-balanced, diverse and high performing CRE portfolio. CRE loans represented 51.2% of the Company’s total loan portfolio at December 31, 2024. In addition, F&M’s commercial real estate office credit exposure represented 5.2% of the Company’s total loan portfolio at December 31, 2024, with a weighted average loan-to-value of approximately 64% and an average loan of approximately $958,100.

    F&M’s CRE portfolio included the following categories at December 31, 2024:

    CRE Category

      Dollar
    Balance
      Percent of
    CRE
    Portfolio
    (*)
      Percent of
    Total Loan
    Portfolio
    (*)
                 
    Industrial   $ 269,315   20.6%   10.5%
    Multi-family     233,868   17.8%   9.1%
    Retail     219,395   16.7%   8.6%
    Hotels     141,514   10.8%   5.5%
    Office     134,139   10.2%   5.2%
    Gas Stations     70,767   5.4%   2.8%
    Food Service     49,246   3.8%   1.9%
    Senior Living     31,799   2.4%   1.3%
    Development     29,491   2.3%   1.2%
    Auto Dealers     28,081   2.1%   1.1%
    Other     103,196   7.9%   4.0%
    Total CRE   $ 1,310,811   100.0%   51.2%

    * Numbers have been rounded

    At December 31, 2024, the Company’s allowance for credit losses to nonperforming loans was 826.70%, compared to 111.95% at December 31, 2023. The allowance to total loans was 1.07% at December 31, 2024, compared to 1.06% at December 31, 2023. Including accretable yield adjustments, associated with the Company’s prior acquisitions, F&M’s allowance for credit losses to total loans was 1.08% at December 31, 2024, compared to 1.13% at December 31, 2023.

    Mr. Eller concluded, “Throughout the new year, we will leverage F&M’s strong banking platform, while continuing to make strategic investments that expanded our operations, capabilities, and services. We believe this will expand operating efficiencies and produce better outcomes for our customers. I am proud of our strong performance in 2024, and expect 2025 to be another good year for F&M.”

    Stockholders’ Equity and Dividends
    Total stockholders’ equity increased 5.9% to $335.2 million, or $24.47 per share at December 31, 2024, from $316.5 million, or $23.17 per share at December 31, 2023. The Company’s Tier 1 leverage ratio of 8.12%, remained stable compared to December 31, 2023.

    Tangible stockholders’ equity increased to $270.0 million at December 31, 2024, compared to $254.2 million at December 31, 2023. On a per share basis, tangible stockholders’ equity at December 31, 2024, was $17.74 per share, compared to $16.29 per share at December 31, 2023.

    For the twelve months ended December 31, 2024, the Company declared cash dividends of $0.8825 per share, representing a 3.8% increase over the same period last year. F&M is committed to returning capital to shareholders and has increased the annual cash dividend for 30 consecutive years. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2024, the dividend payout ratio was 46.07% compared to 50.65% for the same period last year.

    About Farmers & Merchants State Bank:
    F&M Bank is a local independent community bank that has been serving its communities since 1897. F&M Bank provides commercial banking, retail banking and other financial services. Our locations are in Butler, Champaign, Fulton, Defiance, Hancock, Henry, Lucas, Shelby, Williams, and Wood counties in Ohio. In Northeast Indiana, we have offices located in Adams, Allen, DeKalb, Jay, Steuben and Wells counties. The Michigan footprint includes Oakland County, and we have Loan Production Offices in Troy, Michigan; Muncie, Indiana; and Perrysburg and Bryan, Ohio.

    Safe Harbor Statement
    Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. (“F&M”) wishes to take advantage of the Safe Harbor provisions included in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Statements by F&M, including management’s expectations and comments, may not be based on historical facts and are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21B of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Actual results could vary materially depending on risks and uncertainties inherent in general and local banking conditions, competitive factors specific to markets in which F&M and its subsidiaries operate, future interest rate levels, legislative and regulatory decisions, capital market conditions, or the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, and its impacts on our credit quality and business operations, as well as its impact on general economic and financial market conditions. F&M assumes no responsibility to update this information. For more details, please refer to F&M’s SEC filing, including its most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K and quarterly reports on Form 10-Q. Such filings can be viewed at the SEC’s website, www.sec.gov or through F&M’s website www.fm.bank.

    Non-GAAP Financial Measures
    This press release includes disclosure of financial measures not prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (GAAP). A non-GAAP financial measure is a numerical measure of historical or future financial performance, financial position or cash flows that excludes or includes amounts that are required to be disclosed by GAAP. Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. believes that these non-GAAP financial measures provide both management and investors a more complete understanding of the underlying operational results and trends and Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc.’s marketplace performance. The presentation of this additional information is not meant to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for the numbers prepared in accordance with GAAP. A reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures is included within this press release.

    FARMERS & MERCHANTS BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME & COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
    (Unaudited) (in thousands of dollars, except per share data)
     
      Three Months Ended     Twelve Months Ended
      December 31,
    2024
        September 30,
    2024
        June 30,
    2024
        March 31,
    2024
        December 31,
    2023
        December 31,
    2024
        December 31,
    2023
     
    Interest Income                                        
    Loans, including fees $ 36,663     $ 36,873     $ 36,593     $ 35,200     $ 34,493     $ 145,329     $ 129,344  
    Debt securities:                                        
    U.S. Treasury and government agencies 1,882     1,467     1,148     1,045     987     5,542     4,090  
    Municipalities 384     387     389     394     397     1,554     1,598  
    Dividends 367     334     327     333     365     1,361     882  
    Federal funds sold 24     7     7     7     8     45     44  
    Other 2,531     2,833     2,702     1,675     2,020     9,741     3,850  
    Total interest income 41,851     41,901     41,166     38,654     38,270     163,572     139,808  
    Interest Expense                                        
    Deposits 15,749     16,947     16,488     15,279     15,015     64,463     46,923  
    Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase 274     277     276     284     293     1,111     1,474  
    Borrowed funds 2,713     2,804     2,742     2,689     2,742     10,948     8,876  
    Subordinated notes 285     284     285     284     285     1,138     1,138  
    Total interest expense 19,021     20,312     19,791     18,536     18,335     77,660     58,411  
    Net Interest Income – Before Provision for Credit Losses 22,830     21,589     21,375     20,118     19,935     85,912     81,397  
    Provision for (Recovery of) Credit Losses – Loans 346     282     605     (289 )   278     944     1,698  
    Provision for (Recovery of) Credit Losses – Off Balance Sheet Credit Exposures (120 )   (267 )   (18 )   (266 )   189     (671 )   46  
    Net Interest Income After Provision for Credit Losses 22,604     21,574     20,788     20,673     19,468     85,639     79,653  
    Noninterest Income                                        
    Customer service fees 237     300     189     598     415     1,324     1,332  
    Other service charges and fees 1,176     1,155     1,085     1,057     1,090     4,473     4,343  
    Interchange income 1,322     1,315     1,330     1,429     1,310     5,396     5,318  
    Loan servicing income 771     710     513     539     666     2,533     4,405  
    Net gain on sale of loans 223     215     314     107     230     859     699  
    Increase in cash surrender value of bank owned life insurance 248     265     236     216     216     965     834  
    Net gain (loss) on sale of other assets owned 22     –     49     –     (86 )   71     (135 )
    Net loss on sale of available-for-sale securities –     –     –     –     –     –     (891 )
    Total noninterest income 3,999     3,960     3,716     3,946     3,841     15,621     15,905  
    Noninterest Expense                                        
    Salaries and wages 7,020     7,713     7,589     7,846     6,981     30,168     26,915  
    Employee benefits 2,148     2,112     2,112     2,171     1,218     8,543     7,520  
    Net occupancy expense 1,072     1,054     999     1,027     1,187     4,152     3,833  
    Furniture and equipment 1,032     1,472     1,407     1,353     1,370     5,264     5,022  
    Data processing 160     339     448     500     785     1,447     3,147  
    Franchise taxes 312     410     265     555     308     1,542     1,487  
    ATM expense 328     472     397     473     665     1,670     2,611  
    Advertising 498     597     519     530     397     2,144     2,606  
    FDIC assessment 505     516     507     580     594     2,108     1,982  
    Servicing rights amortization – net 244     219     187     168     182     818     611  
    Loan expense 236     244     251     229     246     960     1,055  
    Consulting fees 242     251     198     186     192     877     832  
    Professional fees 368     453     527     445     331     1,793     1,430  
    Intangible asset amortization 446     445     444     445     446     1,780     1,780  
    Other general and administrative 1,465     1,128     1,495     1,333     1,532     5,421     6,373  
    Total noninterest expense 16,076     17,425     17,345     17,841     16,434     68,687     67,204  
    Income Before Income Taxes 10,527     8,109     7,159     6,778     6,875     32,573     28,354  
    Income Taxes 2,146     1,593     1,477     1,419     1,332     6,635     5,567  
    Net Income 8,381     6,516     5,682     5,359     5,543     25,938     22,787  
    Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) (Net of Tax):                                        
    Net unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale securities (7,403 )   11,664     2,531     (1,995 )   13,261     4,797     10,781  
    Reclassification adjustment for realized loss on sale of available-for-sale securities –     –     –     –     –     –     891  
    Net unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale securities (7,403 )   11,664     2,531     (1,995 )   13,261     4,797     11,672  
    Tax expense (benefit) (1,554 )   2,449     531     (418 )   2,784     1,008     2,451  
    Other comprehensive income (loss) (5,849 )   9,215     2,000     (1,577 )   10,477     3,789     9,221  
    Comprehensive Income $ 2,532     $ 15,731     $ 7,682     $ 3,782     $ 16,020     $ 29,727     $ 32,008  
    Basic Earnings Per Share $ 0.61     $ 0.48     $ 0.42     $ 0.39     $ 0.41     $ 1.90     $ 1.67  
    Diluted Earnings Per Share $ 0.61     $ 0.48     $ 0.42     $ 0.39     $ 0.41     $ 1.90     $ 1.67  
    Dividends Declared $ 0.22125     $ 0.22125     $ 0.22     $ 0.22     $ 0.22     $ 0.88250     $ 0.85  
                                             
    FARMERS & MERCHANTS BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
    (Unaudited) (in thousands of dollars, except per share data)
     
      December 31,
    2024
        September 30,
    2024
        June 30,
    2024
        March 31,
    2024
        December 31,
    2023
     
            (Unaudited)     (Unaudited)     (Unaudited)        
    Assets                            
    Cash and due from banks $                       174,855     $                       244,572     $                     191,785     $                     186,541     $                      140,917  
    Federal funds sold 1,496     932     1,283     1,241     1,284  
    Total cash and cash equivalents 176,351     245,504     193,068     187,782     142,201  
                                 
    Interest-bearing time deposits 2,482     2,727     3,221     2,735     2,740  
    Securities – available-for-sale 426,556     404,881     365,209     347,516     358,478  
    Other securities, at cost 14,400     15,028     14,721     14,744     17,138  
    Loans held for sale 2,996     1,706     1,628     2,410     1,576  
    Loans, net of allowance for credit losses of $25,826 12/31/24 and $25,024 12/31/23 2,536,043     2,512,852     2,534,468     2,516,687     2,556,167  
    Premises and equipment 33,828     33,779     34,507     35,007     35,790  
    Construction in progress –     35     38     9     8  
    Goodwill 86,358     86,358     86,358     86,358     86,358  
    Loan servicing rights 5,656     5,644     5,504     5,555     5,648  
    Bank owned life insurance 34,872     34,624     34,359     34,123     33,907  
    Other assets 45,181     46,047     49,552     54,628     43,218  
    Total Assets $                    3,364,723     $                    3,389,185     $                  3,322,633     $                  3,287,554     $                   3,283,229  
                                 
    Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity                            
    Liabilities                            
    Deposits                            
    Noninterest-bearing $                       516,904     $                       481,444     $                     479,069     $                     510,731     $                      528,465  
    Interest-bearing                            
    NOW accounts 850,462     865,617     821,145     829,236     816,790  
    Savings 671,818     661,565     673,284     635,430     599,191  
    Time 647,581     676,187     667,592     645,985     663,017  
    Total deposits 2,686,765     2,684,813     2,641,090     2,621,382     2,607,463  
                                 
    Federal funds purchased and securities                            
    sold under agreements to repurchase 27,218     27,292     27,218     28,218     28,218  
    Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) advances 246,056     263,081     266,102     256,628     265,750  
    Subordinated notes, net of unamortized issuance costs 34,818     34,789     34,759     34,731     34,702  
    Dividend payable 2,996     2,998     2,975     2,975     2,974  
    Accrued expenses and other liabilities 31,659     40,832     27,825     25,930     27,579  
    Total liabilities 3,029,512     3,053,805     2,999,969     2,969,864     2,966,686  
                                 
    Commitments and Contingencies                            
                                 
    Stockholders’ Equity                            
    Common stock – No par value 20,000,000 shares authorized; issued                            
    14,564,425 shares 12/31/24 and 12/31/23; outstanding 13,699,536 135,565     135,193     135,829     135,482     135,515  
    shares 12/31/24 and 13,664,641 shares 12/31/23                            
    Treasury stock – 864,889 shares 12/31/24 and 899,784 shares 12/31/23 (10,985 )   (10,904 )   (11,006 )   (10,851 )   (11,040 )
    Retained earnings 235,854     230,465     226,430     223,648     221,080  
    Accumulated other comprehensive loss (25,223 )   (19,374 )   (28,589 )   (30,589 )   (29,012 )
    Total stockholders’ equity 335,211     335,380     322,664     317,690     316,543  
                                 
    Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity $                    3,364,723     $                    3,389,185     $                  3,322,633     $                  3,287,554     $                   3,283,229  
                                 
    FARMERS & MERCHANTS BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    SELECT FINANCIAL DATA
                                               
        For the Three Months Ended   For the Twelve Months Ended
    Selected financial data   December 31,
    2024
      September 30,
    2024
      June 30,
    2024
      March 31,
    2024
      December 31,
    2023
      December 31,
    2024
      December 31,
    2023
    Return on average assets     0.99%     0.78%     0.69%     0.66%     0.67%     0.78%     0.71%
    Return on average equity     10.00%     7.93%     7.13%     6.76%     7.27%     7.98%     7.46%
    Yield on earning assets     5.20%     5.27%     5.22%     5.00%     4.93%     5.17%     4.67%
    Cost of interest bearing liabilities     3.01%     3.21%     3.18%     3.06%     3.02%     3.12%     2.53%
    Net interest spread     2.19%     2.06%     2.04%     1.94%     1.91%     2.05%     2.14%
    Net interest margin     2.84%     2.71%     2.71%     2.60%     2.57%     2.72%     2.72%
    Efficiency     59.82%     67.98%     69.03%     74.08%     69.23%     67.54%     68.48%
    Dividend payout ratio     35.75%     45.99%     52.35%     55.52%     54.23%     46.07%     50.65%
    Tangible book value per share   $ 17.74   $ 17.72   $ 16.79   $ 16.39   $ 16.29            
    Tier 1 leverage ratio     8.12%     8.04%     8.02%     8.40%     8.20%            
    Average shares outstanding     13,699,869     13,687,119     13,681,501     13,671,166     13,665,773     13,679,955     13,641,336
                                               
    Loans   December 31,
    2024
      September 30,
    2024
      June 30,
    2024
      March 31,
    2024
      December 31,
    2023
               
    (Dollar amounts in thousands)                                          
    Commercial real estate   $ 1,310,811   $ 1,301,160   $ 1,303,598   $ 1,304,400   $ 1,337,766            
    Agricultural real estate     216,401     220,328     222,558     227,455     223,791            
    Consumer real estate     520,114     524,055     525,902     525,178     521,895            
    Commercial and industrial     275,152     260,732     268,426     256,051     254,935            
    Agricultural     152,080     137,252     142,909     127,670     132,560            
    Consumer     63,009     67,394     70,918     74,819     79,591            
    Other     24,978     25,916     26,449     26,776     30,136            
    Less: Net deferred loan fees, costs and other (1)     (676)     1,499     (1,022)     (982)     517            
    Total loans, net   $ 2,561,869   $ 2,538,336   $ 2,559,738   $ 2,541,367   $ 2,581,191            
                                               
                                               
    Asset quality data   December 31,
    2024
      September 30,
    2024
      June 30,
    2024
      March 31,
    2024
      December 31,
    2023
               
    (Dollar amounts in thousands)                                          
    Nonaccrual loans   $ 3,124   $ 2,898   $ 2,487   $ 19,391   $ 22,353            
    90 day past due and accruing   $ –   $ –   $ –   $ –   $ –            
    Nonperforming loans   $ 3,124   $ 2,898   $ 2,487   $ 19,391   $ 22,353            
    Other real estate owned   $ –   $ –   $ –   $ –   $ –            
    Nonperforming assets   $ 3,124   $ 2,898   $ 2,487   $ 19,391   $ 22,353            
                                               
                                               
    Allowance for credit losses   $ 25,826   $ 25,484   $ 25,270   $ 24,680   $ 25,024            
    Allowance for unfunded     1,541     1,661     1,928     1,946     2,212            
    Total allowance for credit losses   $ 27,367   $ 27,145   $ 27,198   $ 26,626   $ 27,236            
    Total allowance for credit losses/total loans     1.07%     1.07%     1.06%     1.05%     1.06%            
    Adjusted credit losses with accretable yield/total loans     1.08%     1.10%     1.10%     1.11%     1.13%            
    Net charge-offs:                                          
    Quarter-to-date   $ 4   $ 68   $ 15   $ 55   $ 531            
    Year-to-date   $ 142   $ 138   $ 70   $ 55   $ 551            
    Net charge-offs to average loans                                          
    Quarter-to-date     0.00%     0.00%     0.00%     0.00%     0.02%            
    Year-to-date     0.01%     0.01%     0.00%     0.00%     0.02%            
    Nonperforming loans/total loans     0.12%     0.11%     0.10%     0.76%     0.87%            
    Allowance for credit losses/nonperforming loans     826.70%     879.37%     1016.08%     127.28%     111.95%            
    NPA coverage ratio     826.70%     879.37%     1016.08%     127.28%     111.95%            
                                               
    (1) Includes carrying value adjustments of $1.1 million as of December 31, 2024, $3.0 million as of September 30, 2024, $612 thousand as of June 30, 2024, $969 thousand as of March 31, 2024 and $2.7 million as of December 31, 2023 related to interest rate swaps
    FARMERS & MERCHANTS BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    AVERAGE BALANCE SHEETS AND RELATED YIELDS AND RATES
    (in thousands of dollars, except percentages)
                               
      For the Three Months Ended     For the Three Months Ended  
      December 31, 2024     December 31, 2023  
    Interest Earning Assets: Average
    Balance
      Interest/
    Dividends
      Annualized
    Yield/Rate
        Average
    Balance
      Interest/
    Dividends
      Annualized
    Yield/Rate
     
    Loans $            2,543,628   $                    36,663   5.77 %   $            2,553,023   $                    34,493   5.41 %
    Taxable investment securities 450,648   2,554   2.27 %   386,931   1,660   1.72 %
    Tax-exempt investment securities 18,571   79   2.15 %   24,145   89   1.87 %
    Fed funds sold & other 209,307   2,555   4.88 %   142,642   2,028   5.69 %
    Total Interest Earning Assets 3,222,154   $                    41,851   5.20 %   3,106,741   $                    38,270   4.93 %
                               
    Nonearning Assets 174,172             189,202          
                               
    Total Assets $            3,396,326             $            3,295,943          
                               
    Interest Bearing Liabilities:                          
    Savings deposits $            1,548,638   $                      9,459   2.44 %   $            1,392,304   $                      8,570   2.46 %
    Other time deposits 666,896   6,290   3.77 %   701,347   6,445   3.68 %
    Other borrowed money 255,490   2,713   4.25 %   265,948   2,742   4.12 %
    Fed funds purchased & securities                          
    sold under agreement to repurchase 27,341   274   4.01 %   28,739   293   4.08 %
    Subordinated notes 34,799   285   3.28 %   34,683   285   3.29 %
    Total Interest Bearing Liabilities $            2,533,164   $                    19,021   3.01 %   $            2,423,021   $                    18,335   3.02 %
                               
    Noninterest Bearing Liabilities 527,751             567,813          
                               
    Stockholders’ Equity $               335,411             $               305,109          
                               
    Net Interest Income and Interest Rate Spread     $                    22,830   2.19 %       $                    19,935   1.91 %
                               
    Net Interest Margin         2.84 %           2.57 %
                               
    Yields on Tax exempt securities and the portion of the tax-exempt IDB loans included in loans have been tax adjusted based on a 21% tax rate in the charts
                               
                               
      For the Twelve Months Ended     For the Twelve Months Ended  
      December 31, 2024     December 31, 2023  
    Interest Earning Assets: Average
    Balance
      Interest/
    Dividends
      Annualized
    Yield/Rate
        Average
    Balance
      Interest/
    Dividends
      Annualized
    Yield/Rate
     
    Loans $            2,557,213   $                  145,329   5.68 %   $            2,491,502   $                  129,344   5.19 %
    Taxable investment securities 410,764   8,129   1.98 %   394,424   6,204   1.57 %
    Tax-exempt investment securities 20,154   328   2.06 %   24,686   366   1.88 %
    Fed funds sold & other 176,307   9,786   5.55 %   85,018   3,894   4.58 %
    Total Interest Earning Assets 3,164,438   $                  163,572   5.17 %   2,995,630   $                  139,808   4.67 %
                               
    Nonearning Assets 164,464             197,726          
                               
    Total Assets $            3,328,902             $            3,193,356          
                               
    Interest Bearing Liabilities:                          
    Savings deposits $            1,502,365   $                    39,750   2.65 %   $            1,376,318   $                    27,424   1.99 %
    Other time deposits 663,320   24,713   3.73 %   640,390   19,499   3.04 %
    Other borrowed money 262,094   10,948   4.18 %   220,175   8,876   4.03 %
    Fed funds purchased & securities                          
    sold under agreement to repurchase 27,750   1,111   4.00 %   35,421   1,474   4.16 %
    Subordinated notes 34,755   1,138   3.27 %   34,640   1,138   3.29 %
    Total Interest Bearing Liabilities $            2,490,284   $                    77,660   3.12 %   $            2,306,944   $                    58,411   2.53 %
                               
    Noninterest Bearing Liabilities 513,588             580,931          
                               
    Stockholders’ Equity $               325,030             $                305,481          
                               
    Net Interest Income and Interest Rate Spread     $                    85,912   2.05 %       $                    81,397   2.14 %
                               
    Net Interest Margin         2.72 %           2.72 %
                               
    Yields on Tax exempt securities and the portion of the tax-exempt IDB loans included in loans have been tax adjusted based on a 21% tax rate in the charts
    FARMERS & MERCHANTS BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    AVERAGE BALANCE SHEETS AND RELATED YIELDS AND RATES
    (in thousands of dollars, except percentages)
     
      For the Three Months Ended December 31, 2024   For the Three Months Ended December 31, 2023
      As Reported   Excluding Acc/Amort   Difference   As Reported   Excluding Acc/Amort   Difference
      $ Yield     $ Yield     $   Yield     $ Yield     $ Yield     $   Yield  
    Interest Earning Assets:                                                  
    Loans $         36,663 5.77 %   $     36,039 5.67 %   $          624   0.10 %   $         34,493 5.41 %   $     33,769 5.29 %   $          724   0.12 %
    Taxable investment securities 2,554 2.27 %   2,554 2.27 %   –   0.00 %   1,660 1.72 %   1,660 1.72 %   –   0.00 %
    Tax-exempt investment securities 79 2.15 %   79 2.15 %   –   0.00 %   89 1.87 %   89 1.87 %   –   0.00 %
    Fed funds sold & other 2,555 4.88 %   2,555 4.88 %   –   0.00 %   2,028 5.69 %   2,028 5.69 %   –   0.00 %
    Total Interest Earning Assets 41,851 5.20 %   41,227 5.12 %   624   0.08 %   38,270 4.93 %   37,546 4.84 %   724   0.09 %
                                                       
    Interest Bearing Liabilities:                                                  
    Savings deposits $           9,459 2.44 %   $       9,459 2.44 %   $             –   0.00 %   $           8,570 2.46 %   $       8,570 2.46 %   $             –   0.00 %
    Other time deposits 6,290 3.77 %   6,290 3.77 %   –   0.00 %   6,445 3.68 %   6,381 3.64 %   64   0.04 %
    Other borrowed money 2,713 4.25 %   2,710 4.24 %   3   0.01 %   2,742 4.12 %   2,760 4.15 %   (18 ) -0.03 %
    Federal funds purchased  and                                                  
    securities sold under agreement to                                                  
    repurchase 274 4.01 %   274 4.01 %   –   0.00 %   293 4.08 %   293 4.08 %   –   0.00 %
    Subordinated notes 285 3.28 %   285 3.28 %   –   0.00 %   285 3.29 %   285 3.29 %   –   0.00 %
    Total Interest Bearing Liabilities 19,021 3.01 %   19,018 3.00 %   3   0.01 %   18,335 3.02 %   18,289 3.02 %   46   0.00 %
                                                       
    Interest/Dividend income/yield 41,851 5.20 %   41,227 5.12 %   624   0.08 %   38,270 4.93 %   37,546 4.84 %   724   0.09 %
    Interest Expense / yield 19,021 3.01 %   19,018 3.00 %   3   0.01 %   18,335 3.02 %   18,289 3.02 %   46   0.00 %
    Net Interest Spread 22,830 2.19 %   22,209 2.12 %   621   0.07 %   19,935 1.91 %   19,257 1.82 %   678   0.09 %
    Net Interest Margin   2.84 %     2.76 %       0.08 %     2.57 %     2.48 %       0.09 %
                                                       
      For the Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2024   For the Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2023
      As Reported   Excluding Acc/Amort   Difference   As Reported   Excluding Acc/Amort   Difference
      $ Yield     $ Yield     $   Yield     $ Yield     $ Yield     $   Yield  
    Interest Earning Assets:                                                  
    Loans $       145,329 5.68 %   $   142,627 5.58 %   $       2,702   0.10 %   $       129,344 5.19 %   $   126,133 5.06 %   $       3,211   0.13 %
    Taxable investment securities 8,129 1.98 %   8,129 1.98 %   –   0.00 %   6,204 1.57 %   6,204 1.57 %   –   0.00 %
    Tax-exempt investment securities 328 2.06 %   328 2.06 %   –   0.00 %   366 1.88 %   366 1.88 %   –   0.00 %
    Fed funds sold & other 9,786 5.55 %   9,786 5.55 %   –   0.00 %   3,894 4.58 %   3,894 4.58 %   –   0.00 %
    Total Interest Earning Assets 163,572 5.17 %   160,870 5.09 %   2,702   0.08 %   139,808 4.67 %   136,597 4.57 %   3,211   0.10 %
                                                       
    Interest Bearing Liabilities:                                                  
    Savings deposits $         39,750 2.65 %   $     39,750 2.65 %   $             –   0.00 %   $         27,424 1.99 %   $     27,424 1.99 %   $             –   0.00 %
    Other time deposits 24,713 3.73 %   24,713 3.73 %   –   0.00 %   19,499 3.04 %   19,839 3.10 %   (340 ) -0.06 %
    Other borrowed money 10,948 4.18 %   10,964 4.18 %   (16 ) 0.00 %   8,876 4.03 %   8,947 4.06 %   (71 ) -0.03 %
    Federal funds purchased  and                                                  
    securities sold under agreement to                                                  
    repurchase 1,111 4.00 %   1,111 4.00 %   –   0.00 %   1,474 4.16 %   1,474 4.16 %   –   0.00 %
    Subordinated notes 1,138 3.27 %   1,138 3.27 %   –   0.00 %   1,138 3.29 %   1,138 3.29 %   –   0.00 %
    Total Interest Bearing Liabilities 77,660 3.12 %   77,676 3.12 %   (16 ) 0.00 %   58,411 2.53 %   58,822 2.55 %   (411 ) -0.02 %
                                                       
    Interest/Dividend income/yield 163,572 5.17 %   160,870 5.09 %   2,702   0.08 %   139,808 4.67 %   136,597 4.57 %   3,211   0.10 %
    Interest Expense / yield 77,660 3.12 %   77,676 3.12 %   (16 ) 0.00 %   58,411 2.53 %   58,822 2.55 %   (411 ) -0.02 % 
    Net Interest Spread 85,912 2.05 %   83,194 1.97 %   2,718   0.08 %   81,397 2.14 %   77,775 2.02 %   3,622   0.12 %
    Net Interest Margin   2.72 %     2.63 %       0.09 %     2.72 %     2.60 %       0.12 %
    Company Contact: Investor and Media Contact:
    Lars B. Eller
    President and Chief Executive Officer
    Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc.
    (419) 446-2501
    leller@fm.bank
    Andrew M. Berger
    Managing Director
    SM Berger & Company, Inc.
    (216) 464-6400
    andrew@smberger.com

    The MIL Network –

    February 13, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Cortez Masto, Risch Renew Push for Bipartisan Legislation to Protect Critical Mineral Production in the West

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Nevada Cortez Masto
    Washington, D.C. – Today, U.S. Senator Catherine Cortez Masto (D-Nev.) and Jim Risch (R-Idaho) reintroduced the Mining Regulatory Clarity Act to allow critical mineral production to continue in the West. This bill is led in the U.S. House of Representatives by Congressman Mark Amodei (R-Nev.-02).
    “We need to streamline our federal permitting process to unleash the full potential of Nevada’s critical mineral economy,” said Senator Cortez Masto. “I’m continuing my bipartisan push to pass this commonsense bill that will cut red tape, protect mining jobs in Nevada, help support clean energy projects nationwide.”
    “Domestic mineral production is critical to everyday energy, technology, and national security needs,” said Senator Risch. “For too long, Idaho’s minerals have been tied up in red tape, preventing responsible use of our natural resources. The Mining Regulatory Clarity Act ensures mining projects in Idaho and across the West can proceed and provide invaluable support to our communities and country.” 
    “The Rosemont Decision overturned decades of established precedent that allowed our domestic mining operations to flourish, and instead blocked production efforts with excessive red tape,” said Representative Mark Amodei. “Out West, we have an abundance of natural resources that we can responsibly utilize to reduce our reliance on adversaries and strengthen our national security. This bill reverses the damage caused by the misguided Rosemont Decision and restores clarity for critical mining projects to move forward.”
    “The Nevada Mining Association applauds and supports the bipartisan Mining Regulatory Clarity Act,” said Amanda Hilton, President of Nevada Mining Association. “Nevada is a leading producer of critical minerals like copper, lithium, and magnesium, along with more than 20 other materials essential to daily life. This legislation provides necessary stability for Nevada’s modern mining industry, ensuring it can operate efficiently and sustain the high-paying jobs that tens of thousands of Nevada families depend on. We appreciate Senator Cortez Masto’s ongoing leadership in advocating for Nevada’s mining community.”
    “The bipartisan Mining Regulatory Clarity Act is KEY to ensuring the U.S. can use our vast domestic resources to build the essential mineral supply chains we know we must have,” said Rich Nolan, National Mining Association president and CEO. “China’s recent actions to cut off VITAL mineral supply chains underscores the need to strengthen domestic mineral supply chains for manufacturing, energy, national security and other priorities. This legislation ensures the fundamental ability to conduct responsible mining activities on federal lands. Regulatory certainty, or the lack thereof, will either underpin or undermine efforts to meet the extraordinary mineral demand now at our doorstep.”
    “BPC Action is pleased to see Sens. James Risch (R-ID) and Catherine Cortez Masto (D-NV) working together to tackle barriers to expand America’s critical mineral supply. The bipartisan Mining Regulatory Clarity Act provides much needed regulatory certainty for mining projects, strengthening critical mineral supply chains while driving job creation in the sector,” said Michele Stockwell, President of Bipartisan Policy Center Action. 
    “If we’re going to achieve U.S. energy dominance, spur innovation, and support American manufacturing, we need to expand the domestic production of critical minerals. We can do so while supporting workers, communities, and our natural resources through sensible, transparent, and efficient regulations. Advanced Energy United is encouraged to see the “Mining Regulatory Clarity Act,” which should enhance business certainty around our mining rules and regulations,” said Harry Godfrey, Managing Director for Federal Affairs at Advanced Energy United.
    “As demand for electric vehicles continues to grow at home and abroad, the need for mineral commodities, including lithium, cobalt, graphite, and copper will likewise rise dramatically. Mining is essential for the United States to fulfill demand in the electric vehicle and clean energy sectors, not to mention other mineral applications in defense, consumer electronics, and advanced computing. The Mining Regulatory Clarity Act is the result of a years-long, bipartisan effort to reestablish certainty for mineral producers in the United States. ZETA applauds Senators Cortez Masto and Risch for their tireless efforts to advance this critical legislation,” said Albert Gore, Zero Emission Transportation Association (ZETA).
    The Mining Regulatory Clarity Act provides regulatory certainty for mining projects and reaffirms long-held practice that some public land use under a mining claim inherently accompanies exploration and extraction activities for other mining-support activities. This bill creates an optional and voluntary pathway to allow use of public lands for ancillary purposes connected to a mining project that can only be used within an agency-approved Plan of Operations. The bill also creates a new revenue stream from new mill site claims to be dedicated to abandoned mine clean-up efforts. This legislation is cosponsored by Senators Jacky Rosen (D-Nev.), Mike Crapo (R-Idaho), and Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska).
    Senator Cortez Masto has led efforts in Congress to support Nevada’s mining industry, protecting more than 83,000 local jobs and paving the way for Nevada to power the clean energy economy. She has consistently blocked burdensome taxes on mining and wrote important provisions of the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law to bolster Nevada’s critical mineral supply chain and fund battery recycling programs in the state. She’s also introduced bipartisan legislation to strengthen the domestic supply chain for rare-earth magnets.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    February 13, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: Birchcliff Energy Ltd. Announces Unaudited 2024 Full-Year and Fourth Quarter Results and 2024 Reserves Highlights

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    CALGARY, Alberta, Feb. 12, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Birchcliff Energy Ltd. (“Birchcliff” or the “Corporation”) (TSX: BIR) is pleased to announce its unaudited 2024 full-year and fourth quarter financial and operational results and highlights from its independent reserves evaluation effective December 31, 2024.

    “Due to the success of our 2024 capital program and driven by our improved capital efficiencies, we delivered annual average production of 76,695 boe/d and adjusted funds flow(1) of $236.8 million and returned $107.8 million to shareholders through common share dividends in 2024,” commented Chris Carlsen, President and Chief Executive Officer of Birchcliff. “The 27 wells we brought on production as part of the 2024 capital program delivered strong PDP reserves additions of 34.1 MMboe, which highlights the quality of our assets. We believe that there is significant intrinsic shareholder value embedded in Birchcliff’s asset base that is not reflected in our current share price, as demonstrated by our PDP reserves net asset value per common share(2) of $6.35 and $13.79 and $18.09 for our proved and proved plus probable reserves, respectively.(3) In addition, our Elmworth asset, which is largely unbooked from a reserves basis, provides us with significant inventory and a large potential future development area consisting of approximately 145 net sections of Montney lands.”

    “Our strategy for 2025 builds off of the operational momentum from 2024, maintaining our focus on capital efficiency improvements and further driving down costs. Our 2025 capital program has been designed to ensure that our capital is strategically deployed throughout the year, providing us with the flexibility to adjust our capital spending if necessary in response to the commodity price volatility we expect during 2025, including as a result of the potential for U.S. and Canadian tariffs and the start-up of LNG Canada.”

    2024 Financial and Operational Highlights

    • Delivered annual average production of 76,695 boe/d (82% natural gas and 18% liquids) in 2024 and quarterly average production of 77,623 boe/d (82% natural gas and 18% liquids) in Q4 2024.
    • Generated annual adjusted funds flow of $236.8 million in 2024 and quarterly adjusted funds flow of $71.8 million in Q4 2024. Cash flow from operating activities was $203.7 million in 2024 and $45.6 million in Q4 2024.
    • Reported annual net income to common shareholders of $56.1 million in 2024 and quarterly net income to common shareholders of $35.2 million in Q4 2024.
    • F&D capital expenditures were $273.1 million in 2024 and $58.3 million in Q4 2024. Birchcliff drilled 29 (29.0 net) wells and brought 27 (27.0 net) wells on production in 2024.
    • Returned $107.8 million to shareholders in 2024 through common share dividends.

    2024 Reserves Highlights(4)

    • Birchcliff brought 27 new wells on production as part of its 2024 F&D capital program with strong PDP reserves additions of 34.1 MMboe (1.26 MMboe per well) and delivered PDP F&D costs(5) of $8.01/boe, resulting in a PDP F&D operating netback recycle ratio(2) of 1.4x in 2024 on such additions.
    • Birchcliff added an aggregate of 23.7 MMboe of PDP reserves on an F&D basis in 2024, after adding back 2024 actual production of 28.1 MMboe(6) and including all other applicable PDP reserves adjustments in 2024. Birchcliff’s PDP reserves totalled 217.1 MMboe at December 31, 2024.
    • Birchcliff delivered PDP F&D costs of $11.52/boe and a PDP F&D operating netback recycle ratio of 1.0x on its aggregate 23.7 MMboe of PDP reserves additions, notwithstanding $18.8 million in F&D capital expenditures spent on strategic priorities in Elmworth for which there was no production or reserves assigned at year-end 2024.
    • At December 31, 2024, the net present value of future net revenue (before income taxes, discounted at 10%) was $2.3 billion for Birchcliff’s PDP reserves, $4.4 billion for its proved reserves and $5.6 billion for its proved plus probable reserves.
    • The net asset value per common share of Birchcliff’s PDP, proved and proved plus probable reserves at December 31, 2024 was $6.35, $13.79 and $18.09, respectively, which is 9%, 136% and 210% higher than the closing price of its common shares on the TSX on February 10, 2025 of $5.84.
    • Reserves life index(5) at December 31, 2024 of 7.7 years on a PDP basis, 23.6 years on a proved basis and 34.3 years on a proved plus probable basis.

    Birchcliff anticipates filing its annual information form and audited financial statements and related management’s discussion and analysis for the year ended December 31, 2024 on March 12, 2025.

    This press release contains forward-looking statements and forward-looking information within the meaning of applicable securities laws. For further information regarding the forward-looking statements and forward-looking information contained herein, see “Advisories – Forward-Looking Statements”. With respect to the disclosure of Birchcliff’s reserves and related reserves metrics contained in this press release, see “2024 Year-End Reserves”, “Presentation of Oil and Gas Reserves” and “Advisories – Oil and Gas Metrics”. With respect to the disclosure of Birchcliff’s production contained in this press release, unless otherwise stated herein, production volumes have been disclosed on a “gross” basis as such term is defined in National Instrument 51-101– Standards of Disclosure for Oil and Gas Activities (“NI 51-101”). For further information regarding the disclosure of Birchcliff’s production contained herein, see “Advisories – Production”. In addition, this press release uses various “non-GAAP financial measures”, “non-GAAP ratios” and “capital management measures” as such terms are defined in National Instrument 52-112 – Non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures Disclosure (“NI 52-112”). Non-GAAP financial measures and non-GAAP ratios are not standardized financial measures under GAAP and might not be comparable to similar financial measures disclosed by other issuers. For further information regarding the non-GAAP and other financial measures used in this press release, see “Non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures”.

    ______________________________

    (1)  Non-GAAP financial measure. See “Non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures”.

    (2)  Non-GAAP ratio. See “Non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures”.

    (3)  Net asset value per common share is at December 31, 2024 and before income taxes (discounted at 10%). See “2024 Year-End Reserves – Net Asset Value”.

    (4)  Deloitte LLP (“Deloitte”) prepared an independent evaluation of the Corporation’s reserves effective December 31, 2024 as contained in their report dated February 12, 2025 (the “Deloitte Report”). The forecast commodity prices, inflation and exchange rates utilized in the Deloitte Report were computed using the average of forecasts from Deloitte, McDaniel & Associates Consultants Ltd. (“McDaniel”), GLJ Ltd. (“GLJ”) and Sproule Associates Limited (“Sproule”) effective January 1, 2025 (the “2024 Price Forecast”). See “2024 Year-End Reserves” and “Presentation of Oil and Gas Reserves”.

    (5)  See “Advisories – Oil and Gas Metrics”.

    (6)  Consists of 738.2 Mbbls of light oil, 1,619.6 Mbbls of condensate, 2,591.3 Mbbls of NGLs and 138,728.6 MMcf of natural gas.

    2024 UNAUDITED FINANCIAL AND OPERATIONAL SUMMARY

      Three months ended
    December 31,
      Twelve months ended
    December 31,
     
      2024   2023   2024   2023  
    OPERATING        
    Average production        
    Light oil (bbls/d) 1,993   1,649   2,017   1,849  
    Condensate (bbls/d) 4,310   5,145   4,425   5,202  
    NGLs (bbls/d) 7,748   7,653   7,080   6,306  
    Natural gas (Mcf/d) 381,433   372,594   379,040   374,052  
    Total (boe/d) 77,623   76,546   76,695   75,699  
    Average realized sales prices (CDN$)(1)        
    Light oil (per bbl) 95.18   100.07   98.90   99.07  
    Condensate (per bbl) 95.79   103.80   99.66   103.76  
    NGLs (per bbl) 26.20   26.95   26.37   26.92  
    Natural gas (per Mcf) 2.27   2.92   2.05   3.03  
    Total (per boe) 21.53   26.02   20.90   26.79  
             
    NETBACK AND COST ($/boe)        
    Petroleum and natural gas revenue(1) 21.53   26.03   20.91   26.80  
    Royalty expense (1.26 ) (2.75 ) (1.41 ) (2.54 )
    Operating expense (2.91 ) (3.81 ) (3.24 ) (3.83 )
    Transportation and other expense(2) (5.26 ) (5.53 ) (5.24 ) (5.69 )
    Operating netback(2) 12.10   13.94   11.02   14.74  
    G&A expense, net (2.00 ) (1.80 ) (1.45 ) (1.52 )
    Interest expense (1.40 ) (0.95 ) (1.31 ) (0.74 )
    Lease interest expense (0.33 ) –   (0.16 ) –  
    Realized gain (loss) on financial instruments 1.68   (0.38 ) 0.33   (1.35 )
    Other cash income (expense) 0.01   0.01   0.01   (0.03 )
    Adjusted funds flow(2) 10.06   10.82   8.44   11.10  
    Depletion and depreciation expense (8.96 ) (8.44 ) (8.79 ) (8.20 )
    Unrealized gain (loss) on financial instruments 5.95   (1.58 ) 3.51   (1.38 )
    Other expenses(3) (0.75 ) (1.88 ) (0.52 ) (0.95 )
    Deferred income tax (expense) recovery (1.37 ) 0.29   (0.64 ) (0.22 )
    Net income (loss) to common shareholders 4.93   (0.79 ) 2.00   0.35  
             
    FINANCIAL        
    Petroleum and natural gas revenue ($000s)(1) 153,741   183,295   586,856   740,359  
    Cash flow from operating activities ($000s) 45,641   79,006   203,710   320,529  
    Adjusted funds flow ($000s)(4) 71,838   76,215   236,794   306,827  
    Per basic common share ($)(2) 0.27   0.29   0.88   1.15  
    Free funds flow ($000s)(4) 13,528   18,049   (36,290 ) 2,190  
    Per basic common share ($)(2) 0.05   0.07   (0.13 ) 0.01  
    Net income (loss) to common shareholders ($000s) 35,216   (5,533 ) 56,100   9,780  
    Per basic common share ($) 0.13   (0.02 ) 0.21   0.04  
    End of period basic common shares (000s) 271,304   267,156   271,304   267,156  
    Weighted average basic common shares (000s) 270,185   266,667   269,081   266,465  
    Dividends on common shares ($000s) 27,126   53,390   107,833   213,344  
    F&D capital expenditures ($000s)(5) 58,310   58,166   273,084   304,637  
    Total capital expenditures ($000s)(4) 66,673   59,541   282,745   307,916  
    Revolving term credit facilities ($000s) 566,857   372,097   566,857   372,097  
    Total debt ($000s)(6) 535,557   382,306   535,557   382,306  

    (1)  Excludes the effects of financial instruments but includes the effects of any physical delivery contracts.

    (2)  Non-GAAP ratio. See “Non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures”.

    (3)  Includes non-cash items such as compensation, accretion, amortization of deferred financing fees and other gains and losses.

    (4)  Non-GAAP financial measure. See “Non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures”.

    (5)  See “Advisories – F&D Capital Expenditures”.

    (6)  Capital management measure. See “Non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures”.

    FULL-YEAR AND Q4 2024 UNAUDITED FINANCIAL AND OPERATIONAL RESULTS

    Production

    • Birchcliff’s production averaged 76,695 boe/d in 2024, a 1% increase from 2023. Production averaged 77,623 boe/d in Q4 2024, a 1% increase from Q4 2023. Birchcliff’s annual average production for 2024 was at the high-end of its guidance range of 75,000 to 77,000 boe/d.
    • The increases were primarily due to the strong performance of the Corporation’s capital program and the successful drilling of new Montney/Doig wells brought on production, partially offset by natural production declines. Full-year production in 2023 was negatively impacted by an unplanned system outage on Pembina’s Northern Pipeline system, which reduced the Corporation’s NGLs sales volumes in 2023.
    • Liquids accounted for 18% of Birchcliff’s total production in both 2024 and 2023, which was in line with Birchcliff’s guidance of 19%. Liquids accounted for 18% of Birchcliff’s total production in Q4 2024 as compared to 19% in Q4 2023.

    Adjusted Funds Flow and Cash Flow From Operating Activities

    • Birchcliff generated adjusted funds flow of $236.8 million in 2024, or $0.88 per basic common share, both of which decreased by 23% from 2023. Adjusted funds flow was $71.8 million in Q4 2024, or $0.27 per basic common share, a 6% and 7% decrease from Q4 2023, respectively. Birchcliff’s full-year adjusted funds flow in 2024 was higher than its guidance of $230 million primarily due to lower than expected royalty and G&A expenses.
    • Birchcliff’s cash flow from operating activities was $203.7 million in 2024, a 36% decrease from 2023. Cash flow from operating activities was $45.6 million in Q4 2024, a 42% decrease from Q4 2023.
    • The decreases in adjusted funds flow and cash flow from operating activities were primarily due to lower natural gas revenue, which was largely the result of a 32% and 22% decrease in the average realized sales price Birchcliff received for its natural gas production in the full-year and Q4 2024, respectively, as compared to 2023, and higher interest expenses. Birchcliff’s adjusted funds flow and cash flow from operating activities were positively impacted by lower royalty expenses and realized gains on financial instruments of $9.3 million and $12.0 million in the full-year and Q4 2024, respectively, as compared to realized losses on financial instruments of $37.3 million and $2.6 million in 2023.

    Net Income (Loss) to Common Shareholders

    • Birchcliff earned net income to common shareholders of $56.1 million in 2024, or $0.21 per basic common share, as compared to $9.8 million and $0.04 per basic common share in 2023. The increases were primarily due to an unrealized mark-to-market gain on financial instruments of $98.6 million in 2024 as compared to an unrealized mark-to-market loss on financial instruments of $38.2 million in 2023, partially offset by lower adjusted funds flow in 2024.
    • Birchcliff earned net income to common shareholders of $35.2 million in Q4 2024, or $0.13 per basic common share, as compared to a net loss to common shareholders of $5.5 million and $0.02 per basic common share in Q4 2023. The change to a net income position was primarily due to an unrealized mark-to-market gain on financial instruments of $42.5 million in Q4 2024 as compared to an unrealized mark-to-market loss on financial instruments of $11.1 million in Q4 2023.

    Debt and Credit Facilities

    • Total debt at December 31, 2024 was $535.6 million, a 40% increase from December 31, 2023. Birchcliff’s 2024 year-end total debt was at the high-end of its guidance range of $515 million to $535 million.
    • At December 31, 2024, Birchcliff had a balance outstanding under its extendible revolving credit facilities (the “Credit Facilities”) of $570.9 million (December 31, 2023: $374.1 million) from available Credit Facilities of $850.0 million (December 31, 2023: $850.0 million), leaving the Corporation with $279.1 million (33%) of unutilized credit capacity after adjusting for outstanding letters of credit and unamortized deferred financing fees. This unutilized credit capacity provides Birchcliff with significant financial flexibility and available capital resources. The Credit Facilities have a maturity date of May 11, 2027 and do not contain any financial maintenance covenants.

    Marketing and Natural Gas Market Diversification

    • Birchcliff’s physical natural gas sales exposure primarily consists of the AECO, Dawn and Alliance markets. In addition, the Corporation has various financial instruments outstanding that provide it with exposure to NYMEX HH pricing.

    The following table sets forth Birchcliff’s effective sales, production and average realized sales price for natural gas and liquids for Q4 2024, after taking into account the Corporation’s financial instruments:

    Three months ended December 31, 2024
      Effective
    sales
    (CDN$000s)
    Percentage of total sales
    (%)
    Effective
    production
    (per day)
    Percentage of
    total natural gas production
    (%)
    Percentage of
    total corporate production
    (%)
    Effective average realized
    sales price
    (CDN$)
    Market            
    AECO(1)(2) 11,831 6 82,345 Mcf 21 18 1.56/Mcf
    Dawn(3) 48,281 26 162,555 Mcf 43 35 3.23/Mcf
    NYMEX HH(1)(4) 53,015 28 136,533 Mcf 36 29 4.22/Mcf
    Total natural gas(1) 113,127 60 381,433 Mcf 100 82 3.22/Mcf
    Light oil 17,450 10 1,993 bbls   3 95.18/bbl
    Condensate 37,985 20 4,310 bbls   5 95.79/bbl
    NGLs 18,679 10 7,748 bbls   10 26.20/bbl
    Total liquids 74,114 40 14,051 bbls   18 57.33/bbl
    Total corporate(1) 187,241 100 77,623 boe   100 26.22/boe

    (1)  Effective sales and effective average realized sales price on a total natural gas and total corporate basis and for the AECO and NYMEX HH markets are non-GAAP financial measures and non-GAAP ratios, respectively. See “Non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures”.

    (2)  Birchcliff has short-term physical sales agreements with third-party marketers to sell and deliver into the Alliance pipeline system. All of Birchcliff’s short-term physical Alliance sales and production during Q4 2024 received AECO premium pricing and have therefore been included as effective sales and production in the AECO market.

    (3)  Birchcliff has agreements for the firm service transportation of an aggregate of 175,000 GJ/d of natural gas on TransCanada PipeLines’ Canadian Mainline, whereby natural gas is transported to the Dawn trading hub in Southern Ontario.

    (4)  NYMEX HH effective sales and production include financial NYMEX HH/AECO 7A basis swap contracts for an aggregate of 147,500 MMBtu/d at an average contract price of NYMEX HH less US$1.12/MMBtu during Q4 2024.
    Birchcliff’s effective average realized sales price for NYMEX HH of CDN$4.22/Mcf (US$2.76/MMBtu) was determined on a gross basis before giving effect to the average NYMEX HH/AECO 7A fixed contract basis differential price of CDN$1.71/Mcf (US$1.12/MMBtu) and includes any realized gains and losses on financial NYMEX HH/AECO 7A basis swap contracts during Q4 2024.
    After giving effect to the NYMEX HH/AECO 7A fixed contract basis differential price and including any realized gains and losses on financial NYMEX HH/AECO 7A basis swap contracts during Q4 2024, Birchcliff’s effective average realized net sales price for NYMEX HH was CDN$2.51/Mcf (US$1.64/MMBtu) in Q4 2024.

    The following table sets forth Birchcliff’s physical sales, production, average realized sales price, transportation costs and natural gas sales netback by natural gas market for the periods indicated, before taking into account the Corporation’s financial instruments:

    Three months ended December 31, 2024
    Natural
    gas
    market
    Natural gas
    sales(1)
    (CDN$000s)
    Percentage of
    natural gas
    sales
    (%)
    Natural gas
    production

    (Mcf/d)
    Percentage of
    natural gas
    production

    (%)
    Average realized
    natural gas sales
    price(1)
    (CDN$/Mcf)
    Natural gas
    transportation
    costs
    (2)
    (CDN$/Mcf)
    Natural gas
    sales
    netback
    (3)
    (CDN$/Mcf)
    AECO 31,027 39 216,321 57 1.57 0.38 1.19
    Dawn 48,281 60 162,555 42 3.23 1.43 1.80
    Alliance(4) 307 1 2,557 1 1.30 – 1.30
    Total 79,615 100 381,433 100 2.27 0.83 1.44
    Three months ended December 31, 2023
    Natural
    gas
    market
    Natural gas
    sales(1)
    (CDN$000s)
    Percentage of
    natural gas
    sales
    (%)
    Natural gas
    production

    (Mcf/d)
    Percentage of
    natural gas
    production

    (%)
    Average realized
    natural gas sales
    price(1)
    (CDN$/Mcf)
    Natural gas
    transportation
    costs
    (2)
    (CDN$/Mcf)
    Natural gas
    sales
    netback
    (3)
    (CDN$/Mcf)
    AECO 50,508 51 203,024 55 2.72 0.38 2.33
    Dawn 47,433 47 161,119 43 3.20 1.42 1.78
    Alliance(4) 2,016 2 8,451 2 2.59 – 2.59
    Total 99,957 100 372,594 100 2.92 0.83 2.09

    (1)  Excludes the effects of financial instruments but includes the effects of any physical delivery contracts.

    (2)  Reflects costs to transport natural gas from the field receipt point to the delivery sales trading hub.

    (3)  Natural gas sales netback denotes the average realized natural gas sales price less natural gas transportation costs.

    (4)  Birchcliff has short-term physical sales agreements with third-party marketers to sell and deliver into the Alliance pipeline system. Alliance sales are recorded net of transportation tolls.

    Capital Activities and Investment

    • F&D capital expenditures were $273.1 million in 2024, as compared to Birchcliff’s guidance of $250 million to $270 million.
    • In 2024, the Corporation achieved a significant year-over-year improvement in capital efficiency(7) for its wells of approximately 24% compared to 2023. The following table sets forth the wells that were drilled and brought on production in 2024:
      Number of wells
    drilled in 2024(1)
    Number of wells brought
    on production in 2024
    Pouce Coupe    
         
      04-30 (5-well pad) Montney D1 0(2) 5
             
      16-17 (5-well pad) BD/UM 1 1
        Montney D1 3 3
        Montney D4 1 1
             
      16-15 (6-well pad) Montney D1 6 6
             
      10-22 (5-well pad) Montney D1 5 5
             
      04-05 (5-well pad) Montney D1 5 0(3)
             
    Gordondale    
         
      02-27 (2-well pad) Montney D1 1 1
        Montney D2 1 1
             
      01-10 (4-well pad) Montney D1 4 4
             
    Elmworth    
             
      13-09 vertical Montney 1 0
             
      01-28 horizontal Montney 1 0
           
    TOTAL 29 27

    (1)  All wells are natural gas wells, except for the 4-well 01-10 pad, which are light oil wells.

    (2)  The five wells drilled on the 04-30 pad were drilled in December 2023.

    (3)  The five wells drilled on the 04-05 pad are scheduled to come on production later in February 2025.

    ______________________________

    (7)  See “Advisories – Oil and Gas Metrics”.

    UPDATE ON 2025 CAPITAL PROGRAM

    • As disclosed in Birchcliff’s press release dated January 22, 2025, the Corporation’s board of directors (the “Board”) approved a disciplined F&D capital budget of $260 million to $300 million for 2025. Benefitting from the learnings gained from the Corporation’s 2024 capital program, the wells in Birchcliff’s 2025 capital program are expected to yield strong production, using the Corporation’s latest field development practices and wellbore design, which incorporates longer lateral lengths, reduced cluster spacing and increased proppant loading where appropriate.
    • The Corporation successfully completed drilling its 5-well 04-05 pad in Pouce Coupe in December 2024. Completions operations are currently underway on the pad, with the wells scheduled to come on production later in February 2025. The pad was drilled in the Lower Montney targeting high-rate natural gas wells.
    • The Corporation is currently drilling its 3-well 07-10 pad in Pouce Coupe. The pad is targeting condensate-rich natural gas wells in the Lower Montney. The wells are anticipated to be brought on production at the end of Q1 2025.
    • The Corporation successfully completed drilling its 4-well 02-27 pad in Gordondale in February 2025, with completions operations scheduled to begin in March 2025. The pad is targeting condensate-rich natural gas wells in the Lower Montney. The wells are anticipated to be brought on production in early Q2 2025.
    • In Elmworth, the Corporation completed a horizontal land retention well and has commenced a short clean-up test. As disclosed in the Corporation’s press release on January 22, 2025, this well is not currently planned to be tied in.

    U.S. AND CANADIAN TARIFFS

    • While Birchcliff hopes that there will not be a trade dispute between the United States and Canada, the Corporation believes that Canada’s over-reliance on exporting its energy into the U.S. must be addressed through the reduction of red tape and government interference in the construction of critical infrastructure such as oil and gas pipelines to the east and west coasts of Canada, LNG terminals on each coast and an increase in refining capacity within Canada, in order to diversify Canada’s energy export market. The Corporation continues to actively monitor this situation.
    • Birchcliff believes that its ongoing strategy of maintaining significant natural gas market diversification for 2025 will continue to protect the Corporation from volatility in the North American natural gas pricing environment, including as it relates to potential tariffs. Approximately 41% of Birchcliff’s natural gas production is physically delivered to the Dawn trading hub in Ontario, which is priced in U.S. dollars, and the Corporation also has U.S. denominated financial contracts that expose approximately 35% of its natural gas production to NYMEX HH pricing on a financial basis, without physical delivery into the United States.

    2024 YEAR-END RESERVES

    The reserves data set forth below at December 31, 2024 is based upon the Deloitte Report, which has been prepared in accordance with the standards contained in the Canadian Oil and Gas Evaluation Handbook (the “COGE Handbook”) and NI 51-101.

    The reserves data provided in this press release presents only a portion of the disclosure required under NI 51-101. The disclosure required under NI 51-101 will be contained in Birchcliff’s annual information form for the year ended December 31, 2024, which is expected to be filed on SEDAR+ (www.sedarplus.ca) on March 12, 2025.

    In some of the tables below, numbers may not add due to rounding. The estimates of future net revenue contained herein do not represent fair market value. For additional information regarding the presentation of Birchcliff’s reserves disclosure contained herein, see “Presentation of Oil and Gas Reserves” and “Advisories” in this press release.

    Reserves Summary

    The following table summarizes the estimates of Birchcliff’s gross reserves at December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, estimated using the forecast price and cost assumptions in effect as at the effective date of the applicable reserves evaluation:

    Reserves Category December 31, 2024
    (Mboe)
      December 31, 2023(1)
    (Mboe)
      % Change  
    Proved Developed Producing 217,076   220,536   (2)  
    Total Proved 667,390   691,886   (4)  
    Total Proved Plus Probable 969,636   993,897   (2)  

    (1)  Deloitte prepared an independent evaluation of the Corporation’s reserves effective December 31, 2023 as contained in their report dated February 14, 2024 (the “2023 Deloitte Report”). The forecast commodity prices, inflation and exchange rates utilized in the 2023 Deloitte Report were computed using the average of forecasts from Deloitte, McDaniel, GLJ and Sproule effective January 1, 2024 (the “2023 Price Forecast”).

    The following table sets forth Birchcliff’s light crude oil and medium crude oil, conventional natural gas, shale gas and NGLs reserves at December 31, 2024, estimated using the 2024 Price Forecast:

    Reserves Category Light Crude Oil and
    Medium Crude Oil
    Conventional
    Natural Gas
    Shale Gas NGLs(1) Total Oil Equivalent
    Gross
    (Mbbls)
    Net
    (Mbbls)
    Gross
    (MMcf)
    Net
    (MMcf)
    Gross
    (MMcf)
    Net
    (MMcf)
    Gross
    (Mbbls)
    Net
    (Mbbls)
    Gross
    (Mboe)
    Net
    (Mboe)
    Proved                  
      Developed Producing 4,889 3,946 6,051 5,707 1,053,238 971,102 35,639 29,058 217,076 195,805
      Developed Non-Producing 9 9 0 0 4,840 4,537 239 203 1,054 968
      Undeveloped 7,089 5,747 2,858 2,625 2,320,235 2,094,569 54,988 42,966 449,259 398,246
    Total Proved 11,987 9,701 8,909 8,332 3,378,312 3,070,208 90,866 72,227 667,390 595,019
    Total Probable 9,083 6,933 5,270 4,911 1,442,846 1,272,820 51,811 39,640 302,246 259,529
    Total Proved Plus Probable 21,070 16,635 14,179 13,243 4,821,158 4,343,028 142,676 111,868 969,636 854,547

    (1)  NGLs includes condensate.

    Net Present Values of Future Net Revenue

    The following table sets forth the net present values of future net revenue attributable to Birchcliff’s reserves at December 31, 2024, estimated using the 2024 Price Forecast, before deducting future income tax expenses and calculated at various discount rates:

    Reserves Category Before Income Taxes Discounted At (%/year)   Unit Value
    Discounted
    at 10%/year

    ($/boe)(1)
    0
    ($000s)
    5
    ($000s)
    10
    ($000s)
    15
    ($000s)
    20
    ($000s)
     
    Proved              
    Developed Producing 3,670,971 2,851,081 2,277,750 1,892,104 1,621,811   11.63
    Developed Non-Producing 13,717 9,900 7,499 5,888 4,750   7.75
    Undeveloped 7,083,864 3,707,943 2,073,919 1,199,557 694,944   5.21
    Total Proved 10,768,552 6,568,924 4,359,168 3,097,549 2,321,504   7.33
    Total Probable 6,210,051 2,553,082 1,204,663 632,630 361,133   4.64
    Total Proved Plus Probable 16,978,602 9,122,005 5,563,831 3,730,179 2,682,638   6.51

    (1)   Unit values are based on net reserves volumes.

    Net Asset Value

    Net asset value reflects the estimated long-term fair value of Birchcliff’s underlying reserves assets after settling its outstanding financial obligations at a point in time. The net present value of the Corporation’s reserves can vary significantly depending on the oil and natural gas price assumptions used by Deloitte and assumes only the reserves identified in the applicable reserves report, with no further acquisitions or incremental development.

    The following table sets forth Birchcliff’s net asset value for its PDP, total proved and total proved plus probable reserves for the periods indicated:

    ($000s, except per share amounts) Proved Developed Producing Total Proved Total Proved Plus Probable
    As at December 31,   2024     2023     2024     2023     2024     2023  
    Reserves, NPV10%(1)   2,277,750     2,620,064     4,359,168     5,405,617     5,563,831     6,835,417  
    Total debt(2)   (535,557 )   (382,306 )   (535,557 )   (382,306 )   (535,557 )   (382,306 )
    Unexercised securities(3)   34,961     16,717     34,961     16,717     34,961     16,717  
    Net asset value(4)(5)   1,777,154     2,254,475     3,858,572     5,040,028     5,063,235     6,469,828  
    Net asset value (per common share)(4)(5)(6) $6.35   $8.22   $13.79   $18.38   $18.09   $23.60  

    (1)  Represents the net present value of the future net revenue (before income taxes, discounted at 10%) of Birchcliff’s PDP, total proved and total proved plus probable reserves, as applicable, as estimated by Deloitte effective December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, using forecast prices and costs.

    (2)  Capital management measure. See “Non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures”.

    (3)  Represents the value of unexercised in-the-money stock options and performance warrants outstanding at the end of the year. The closing trading price on the TSX of Birchcliff’s common shares on December 31, 2024 and December 29, 2023 was $5.42 and $5.78, respectively.

    (4)  Excludes any value from undeveloped land and seismic.

    (5)  Net asset value is a non-GAAP financial measure and net asset value per common share is a non-GAAP ratio. See “Non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures”.

    (6) For 2024, based on 279.9 million common shares, which includes 271.3 million basic common shares outstanding at December 31, 2024 and 8.6 million dilutive common shares from unexercised in-the-money stock options and performance warrants outstanding at December 31, 2024. For 2023, based on 274.2 million common shares, which includes 267.2 million basic common shares outstanding at December 31, 2023 and 7.0 million dilutive common shares from unexercised in-the-money stock options and performance warrants outstanding at December 31, 2023.

    Net asset value decreased in all categories of reserves in 2024 as compared to 2023 primarily due to lower forecast prices in the 2024 Price Forecast compared to the 2023 Price Forecast, including an AECO price decrease of approximately 20% for 2025 through 2027 and approximately 11% thereafter.

    Pricing Assumptions

    The following table sets forth the 2024 Price Forecast used in the Deloitte Report:

    Year Crude Oil
      Natural Gas(1)
      NGLs
    Currency Exchange Rate (US$/CDN$) Price and Cost Inflation Rates
    (%)
                                       
    WTI at Cushing Oklahoma (US$/bbl) Edmonton City Gate (CDN$/bbl) Alberta AECO
    Average Price
    (CDN$/Mcf)
    Ontario Dawn
    Reference Point
    (CDN$/Mcf)
    NYMEX Henry Hub
    (US$/Mcf)
    Edmonton Ethane
    (CDN$/bbl)
    Edmonton Propane (CDN$/bbl) Edmonton Butane (CDN$/bbl) Edmonton Pentanes + Condensate (CDN$/bbl)
    2025 71.19   94.00   2.35   4.28   3.30   7.27   32.05   48.68   98.02   0.714 0.0
    2026 73.20   94.84   3.32   4.83   3.76   10.40   31.19   47.43   97.60   0.731 2.0
    2027 74.54   95.28   3.52   4.94   3.93   11.04   31.28   47.63   97.43   0.736 2.0
    2028 76.28   96.40   3.69   5.05   4.01   11.61   31.70   48.26   98.60   0.758 2.0
    2029 77.81   98.33   3.77   5.14   4.10   11.85   32.33   49.22   100.58   0.758 2.0
    2030 79.37   100.30   3.84   5.25   4.17   12.08   32.98   50.20   102.57   0.758 2.0
    2031 80.96   102.31   3.92   5.34   4.25   12.34   33.64   51.21   104.63   0.758 2.0
    2032 82.57   104.36   3.99   5.46   4.34   12.58   34.31   52.24   106.73   0.758 2.0
    2033 84.22   106.44   4.08   5.58   4.43   12.85   35.00   53.27   108.86   0.758 2.0
    2034 85.91   108.57   4.16   5.68   4.52   13.10   35.69   54.35   111.04   0.758 2.0
    2035 87.63   110.74   4.24   5.80   4.61   13.37   36.41   55.43   113.27   0.758 2.0
    2036 89.38   112.95   4.33   5.93   4.69   13.64   37.14   56.54   115.52   0.758 2.0
    2037 91.17   115.21   4.42   6.03   4.79   13.91   37.88   57.67   117.84   0.758 2.0
    2038 92.99   117.51   4.51   6.14   4.88   14.19   38.63   58.83   120.20   0.758 2.0
    2039 94.85   119.86   4.59   6.28   4.99   14.47   39.41   60.00   122.60   0.758 2.0
    2040 96.75   122.26   4.68   6.41   5.09   14.76   40.20   61.20   125.05   0.758 2.0
    2041 98.69   124.71   4.78   6.54   5.19   15.05   41.00   62.43   127.56   0.758 2.0
    2042 100.66   127.20   4.87   6.67   5.29   15.35   41.82   63.68   130.10   0.758 2.0
    2043 102.67   129.75   4.97   6.81   5.39   15.66   42.66   64.94   132.71   0.758 2.0
    2044 104.72   132.34   5.07   6.93   5.51   15.98   43.51   66.24   135.36   0.758 2.0
    2044+ 2.0%   2.0%   2.0%   2.0%   2.0%   2.0%   2.0%   2.0%   2.0%   0.758 2.0

    (1)  1 Mcf = 1 MMBtu.

    Reconciliation of Changes in Reserves

    The following table sets forth the reconciliation of Birchcliff’s gross reserves at December 31, 2024 as set forth in the Deloitte Report, estimated using the 2024 Price Forecast, to Birchcliff’s gross reserves at December 31, 2023:

    Factors Light Crude Oil
    and

    Medium Crude
    Oil

    (Mbbls)
    Conventional
    Natural Gas

    (MMcf)
    Shale Gas
    (MMcf)
    NGLs(8)
    (Mbbls)
    Oil Equivalent
    (Mboe)
    GROSS TOTAL PROVED          
    Opening balance December 31, 2023 14,460   10,251   3,493,022   93,547   691,886  
    Extensions and Improved Recovery(1) 0   0   58,875   2,287   12,099  
    Technical Revisions(2) (1,724 ) 2,244   (37,966 ) (2,022 ) (9,699 )
    Discoveries(3) 0   0   0   0   0  
    Acquisitions(4) 0   0   18,193   1,633   4,665  
    Dispositions(5) 0   0   0   0   0  
    Economic Factors(6) (12 ) (2,746 ) (15,923 ) (367 ) (3,491 )
    Production(7) (738 ) (840 ) (137,889 ) (4,211 ) (28,070 )
    Closing balance December 31, 2024 11,987   8,909   3,378,312   90,866   667,390  
    GROSS TOTAL PROBABLE
    Opening balance December 31, 2023 10,088   5,666   1,438,587   51,213   302,011  
    Extensions and Improved Recovery(1) 0   0   9,320   1,602   3,155  
    Technical Revisions(2) (1,003 ) (2,604 ) (33,104 ) (3,347 ) (10,301 )
    Discoveries(3) 0   0   0   0   0  
    Acquisitions(4) 0   0   24,508   2,296   6,381  
    Dispositions(5) 0   0   0   0   0  
    Economic Factors(6) (2 ) 2,208   3,535   45   1,000  
    Production(7) 0   0   0   0   0  
    Closing balance December 31, 2024 9,083   5,270   1,442,846   51,811   302,246  
    GROSS TOTAL PROVED PLUS PROBABLE
    Opening balance December 31, 2023 24,549   15,917   4,931,609   144,760   993,897  
    Extensions and Improved Recovery(1) 0   0   68,195   3,888   15,254  
    Technical Revisions(2) (2,727 ) (361 ) (71,069 ) (5,369 ) (20,000 )
    Discoveries(3) 0   0   0   0   0  
    Acquisitions(4) 0   0   42,701   3,929   11,046  
    Dispositions(5) 0   0   0   0   0  
    Economic Factors(6) (14 ) (538 ) (12,389 ) (322 ) (2,490 )
    Production(7) (738 ) (840 ) (137,889 ) (4,211 ) (28,070 )
    Closing balance December 31, 2024 21,070   14,179   4,821,158   142,676   969,636  

    (1)  Additions to volumes resulting from capital expenditures for: (i) step-out drilling in previously discovered reservoirs; (ii) infill drilling in previously discovered reservoirs that were not drilled as part of an enhanced recovery scheme; and (iii) the installation of improved recovery schemes.

    (2)  Positive or negative volume revisions to an estimate resulting from new technical data or revised interpretations on previously assigned volumes, performance and operating costs. This category also includes revisions resulting from well locations combined or removed as part of an updated development plan.

    (3)  Additions to volumes in reservoirs where no reserves were previously booked.

    (4)  Positive additions to volume estimates because of purchasing interests in oil and gas properties.

    (5)  Reductions in volume estimates because of selling all or a portion of an interest in oil and gas properties.

    (6)  Changes to volumes resulting from different price forecasts, inflation rates and regulatory changes.

    (7)  Reductions in the volume estimates due to actual production.

    (8)  NGLs includes condensate.

    Key highlights include the following:

    • Extensions and Improved Recovery
      • Reserves were added from 27 wells brought on production pursuant to the Corporation’s successful 2024 capital program. The 2024 program was focused in Birchcliff’s core areas in Pouce Coupe and Gordondale, converting proved and probable undeveloped reserves into PDP reserves.
    • Technical Revisions
      • The technical revisions in all reserves categories for light crude oil and medium crude oil were primarily the result of: (i) higher gas-to-oil ratios for existing producing oil wells in the southeast area in Gordondale; and (ii) potential future drilling location adjustments based on offsetting well performance.
      • The technical revisions in all reserves categories for conventional natural gas were primarily the result of existing well performance.
      • The technical revisions in all reserves categories for shale gas were primarily the result of:

    (i) an updated reserves forecast for existing wells based on historical performance, which included a reduction in the reserves attributable to 56 existing high-density producing wells that were drilled from 2019 to 2023. The Corporation does not expect that the technical revisions relating to these wells will negatively impact future reserves booked for other existing or future wells;

    (ii) an updated full-field development plan, which included the combining or removal of multiple proved and probable potential future drilling locations, resulting in the removal of 10 proved undeveloped locations and 3 probable locations; and

    (iii) an updated reserves forecast for various potential future drilling locations in the Lower Montney in Gordondale as a result of an increase in the reserves attributable to such future locations due to the continued outperformance of existing wells in the area.

    • The technical revisions in all reserves categories for NGLs were primarily the result of: (i) a reduction in shale gas volumes; and (ii) reduced NGLs recoveries at the Corporation’s owned and/or operated natural gas processing plants in Pouce Coupe and Gordondale. The reduced NGLs recoveries were partially offset by reduced natural gas shrinkage.
    • Acquisitions
      • Changes were the result of various accretive acquisitions completed by Birchcliff in the Pouce Coupe and Gordondale areas in 2024.
    • Economic Factors
      • The forecast prices for each product type were generally lower in the 2024 Price Forecast than the 2023 Price Forecast, which resulted in the economic limit at the end of a well’s life being achieved earlier and therefore a reduction of the reserves volumes in the total proved and total proved plus probable categories.

    Future Development Costs

    Future development costs (“FDC”) reflect Deloitte’s best estimate of what it will cost to bring the proved and proved plus probable reserves on production. Changes in forecast FDC occur annually as a result of development activities, acquisition and disposition activities and capital cost estimates. The following table sets forth development costs deducted in the estimation of Birchcliff’s future net revenue attributable to the reserves categories noted below, estimated using the 2024 Price Forecast:

    Year Proved
    ($000s)
    Proved Plus Probable
    ($000s)
    2025 198,395 215,960
    2026 355,662 374,083
    2027 424,921 455,059
    2028 895,366 895,366
    2029 644,546 645,166
    Thereafter 849,599 2,299,368
    Total undiscounted 3,368,489 4,885,002

    FDC for proved reserves on an FD&A basis decreased to $3.37 billion at December 31, 2024 from $3.46 billion at December 31, 2023. FDC for proved plus probable reserves on an FD&A basis decreased to $4.89 billion at December 31, 2024 from $4.97 billion at December 31, 2023. The FDC to drill, case, complete, equip and tie-in for future locations in Birchcliff’s Pouce Coupe and Gordondale areas ($5.9 million per well) did not change from December 31, 2023 to December 31, 2024.

    The FDC for both proved and proved plus probable reserves are primarily the capital costs required to drill, case, complete, equip and tie-in the net undeveloped locations. The estimates of FDC on a proved and proved plus probable basis also include approximately $320 million (unescalated) for the continued expansion of the Pouce Coupe Gas Plant from the existing 340 MMcf/d to 660 MMcf/d of total throughput. The FDC for the expansion of the Pouce Coupe Gas Plant also include the costs of the related gathering pipelines and maintenance capital.

    F&D and FD&A Costs

    The following table sets forth Birchcliff’s F&D and FD&A costs for its PDP, total proved and total proved plus probable reserves for the three previous financial years, including FDC:

      2024(2) 2023 2022 3-Year Average
    F&D costs ($/boe)(1)        
    Proved Developed Producing 11.52(3) 13.16 10.24 11.43
    Total Proved n/a(4) 16.02 82.02 29.43
    Total Proved Plus Probable n/a(4) 24.90 n/a(5) 110.72
    FD&A costs ($/boe)(1)        
    Proved Developed Producing 11.42(6) 13.06 10.25 11.38
    Total Proved 53.86(7) 13.79 78.96 23.24
    Total Proved Plus Probable 50.39(8) 20.97 n/a(5) 49.27

    (1)  See “Advisories – Oil and Gas Metrics” for a description of the methodology used to calculate F&D and FD&A costs.

    (2)  Birchcliff’s F&D and FD&A capital expenditures were $273.1 million and $281.0 million, respectively, in 2024. Birchcliff’s F&D and FD&A capital expenditures included $18.8 million spent on strategics priorities in the Corporation’s Elmworth area for which there was no production or reserves assigned at year-end 2024.

    (3)  Birchcliff added 23.7 MMboe of PDP reserves in 2024, after adding back 2024 actual production of 28.1 MMboe and including all other PDP reserves adjustments in 2024, excluding acquisitions and dispositions.

    (4)  Birchcliff’s proved and proved plus probable reserves decreased in 2024, after adding back 2024 actual production of 28.1 MMboe. As a result of the year-over-year decrease in proved and proved plus probable reserves, the calculation for F&D costs for these reserves categories was not applicable in 2024.

    (5)  Birchcliff’s proved plus probable reserves decreased in 2022, after adding back 2022 actual production of 28.1 MMboe. As a result of the year-over-year decrease in proved plus probable reserves, the calculations for F&D and FD&A costs for this reserves category were not applicable in 2022.

    (6)  Birchcliff added 24.6 MMboe of PDP reserves in 2024, after adding back 2024 actual production of 28.1 MMboe and including all other PDP reserves adjustments in 2024.

    (7)  Includes the 2024 decrease in FDC from 2023 of $88.5 million on a proved basis. Birchcliff added 3.6 MMboe of proved reserves in 2024, after adding back 2024 actual production of 28.1 MMboe and including all other proved reserves adjustments in 2024.

    (8)  Includes the 2024 decrease in FDC from 2023 of $89.0 million on a proved plus probable basis. Birchcliff added 3.8 MMboe of proved plus probable reserves in 2024, after adding back 2024 actual production of 28.1 MMboe and including all other proved plus probable reserves adjustments in 2024.

    Recycle Ratios

    The following table sets forth Birchcliff’s F&D and FD&A operating netback recycle ratios for its PDP, total proved and total proved plus probable reserves for the three previous financial years, including FDC:

      2024 2023 2022 3-Year Average
    F&D operating netback recycle ratio(1)(2)        
    Proved Developed Producing 1.0x 1.1x 3.2x 1.7x
    Total Proved n/a(3) 0.9x 0.4x 0.7x
    Total Proved Plus Probable n/a(3) 0.6x n/a(4) 0.2x
    FD&A operating netback recycle ratio(1)(2)        
    Proved Developed Producing 1.0x 1.1x 3.2x 1.7x
    Total Proved 0.2x 1.1x 0.4x 0.8x
    Total Proved Plus Probable 0.2x 0.7x n/a(4) 0.4x

    (1)  Non-GAAP ratio. See “Non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures”.

    (2)  Birchcliff’s operating netback was $11.02/boe in 2024 as compared to $14.74/boe in 2023 and $32.85/boe in 2022. Operating netback is a non-GAAP ratio. See “Non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures”.

    (3)  As a result of the year-over-year decrease in proved and proved plus probable reserves, the calculation for F&D operating netback recycle ratio for these reserves categories was not applicable in 2024.

    (4)  As a result of the year-over-year decrease in proved plus probable reserves, the calculations for F&D and FD&A operating netback recycle ratio for this reserves category were not applicable in 2022.

    Reserves Replacement

    The following table sets forth Birchcliff’s 2024 reserves replacement on an F&D and FD&A basis for its PDP, total proved and total proved plus probable reserves:

    Reserves Category 2024 F&D Reserves Replacement(1)  2024 FD&A Reserves Replacement(1) 
    Proved Developed Producing 84 % 88 %
    Total Proved n/a(2) 13 %
    Total Proved Plus Probable n/a(2) 14 %

    (1)  See “Advisories – Oil and Gas Metrics” for a description of the methodology used to calculate reserves replacement.

    (2)  As a result of the 1.1 MMboe and 7.2 MMboe decrease in Birchcliff’s proved and proved plus probable reserves, respectively, in 2024, after adding back 2024 actual production of 28.1 MMboe, the calculation for F&D reserves replacement for theses reserves categories was not applicable in 2024.

    Reserves Life Index

    The following table sets forth Birchcliff’s reserves life index for its PDP, total proved and total proved plus probable reserves at December 31, 2024:

    Reserves Category Reserves Life Index(1)  
    Proved Developed Producing 7.7 years  
    Total Proved 23.6 years  
    Total Proved Plus Probable 34.3 years  

    (1)  See “Advisories – Oil and Gas Metrics” for a description of the methodology used to calculate reserves life index.

    ABBREVIATIONS

    AECO benchmark price for natural gas determined at the AECO ‘C’ hub in southeast Alberta
    bbl barrel
    bbls barrels
    bbls/d barrels per day
    BD/UM Basal Doig/Upper Montney
    boe barrel of oil equivalent
    boe/d barrel of oil equivalent per day
    condensate pentanes plus (C5+)
    F&D finding and development
    FD&A finding, development and acquisition
    G&A general and administrative
    GAAP generally accepted accounting principles for Canadian public companies, which are currently International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board
    GJ/d gigajoules per day
    HH Henry Hub
    IP initial production
    LNG liquefied natural gas
    Mbbls thousand barrels
    Mboe thousand barrels of oil equivalent
    Mcf thousand cubic feet
    Mcf/d thousand cubic feet per day
    MMboe million barrels of oil equivalent
    MMBtu million British thermal units
    MMBtu/d million British thermal units per day
    MMcf million cubic feet
    MMcf/d million cubic feet per day
    NGLs natural gas liquids consisting of ethane (C2), propane (C3) and butane (C4) and, except where otherwise noted, excludes condensate
    NPV net present value
    NYMEX New York Mercantile Exchange
    OPEC Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries
    PDP proved developed producing
    Q quarter
    TSX Toronto Stock Exchange
    WTI West Texas Intermediate, the reference price paid in U.S. dollars at Cushing, Oklahoma, for crude oil of standard grade
    000s thousands
    $000s thousands of dollars
       

    NON-GAAP AND OTHER FINANCIAL MEASURES

    This press release uses various “non-GAAP financial measures”, “non-GAAP ratios” and “capital management measures” (as such terms are defined in NI 52-112), which are described in further detail below.

    Non-GAAP Financial Measures

    NI 52-112 defines a non-GAAP financial measure as a financial measure that: (i) depicts the historical or expected future financial performance, financial position or cash flow of an entity; (ii) with respect to its composition, excludes an amount that is included in, or includes an amount that is excluded from, the composition of the most directly comparable financial measure disclosed in the primary financial statements of the entity; (iii) is not disclosed in the financial statements of the entity; and (iv) is not a ratio, fraction, percentage or similar representation. The non-GAAP financial measures used in this press release are not standardized financial measures under GAAP and might not be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies. Investors are cautioned that non-GAAP financial measures should not be construed as alternatives to or more meaningful than the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures as indicators of Birchcliff’s performance. Set forth below is a description of the non-GAAP financial measures used in this press release.

    Adjusted Funds Flow and Free Funds Flow

    Birchcliff defines “adjusted funds flow” as cash flow from operating activities before the effects of decommissioning expenditures, retirement benefit payments and changes in non-cash operating working capital. Birchcliff eliminates settlements of decommissioning expenditures from cash flow from operating activities as the amounts can be discretionary and may vary from period to period depending on its capital programs and the maturity of its operating areas. The settlement of decommissioning expenditures is managed with Birchcliff’s capital budgeting process which considers available adjusted funds flow. Birchcliff eliminates retirement benefit payments from cash flow from operating activities as such payments reflect costs for past service and contributions made by eligible executives under the Corporation’s post-employment benefit plan, which are not indicative of the current period. Changes in non-cash operating working capital are eliminated in the determination of adjusted funds flow as the timing of collection and payment are variable and by excluding them from the calculation, the Corporation believes that it is able to provide a more meaningful measure of its operations and ability to generate cash on a continuing basis. Management believes that adjusted funds flow assists management and investors in assessing Birchcliff’s financial performance after deducting all operating and corporate cash costs, as well as its ability to generate the cash necessary to fund sustaining and/or growth capital expenditures, repay debt, settle decommissioning obligations, buy back common shares and pay dividends.

    Birchcliff defines “free funds flow” as adjusted funds flow less F&D capital expenditures. Management believes that free funds flow assists management and investors in assessing Birchcliff’s ability to generate shareholder value and returns through a number of initiatives, including but not limited to, debt repayment, common share buybacks, the payment of common share dividends, acquisitions and other opportunities that would complement or otherwise improve the Corporation’s business and enhance long-term shareholder value.

    The most directly comparable GAAP financial measure to adjusted funds flow and free funds flow is cash flow from operating activities. The following table provides a reconciliation of cash flow from operating activities to adjusted funds flow and free funds flow for the periods indicated:

      Three months ended
    December 31,
       Twelve months ended
    December 31,
     
    ($000s) 2024   2023   2024   2023  
    Cash flow from operating activities 45,641   79,006   203,710   320,529  
    Change in non-cash operating working capital 25,278   (6,248 ) 17,269   (19,477 )
    Decommissioning expenditures 919   1,457   1,964   3,775  
    Retirement benefit payments –   2,000   13,851   2,000  
    Adjusted funds flow 71,838   76,215   236,794   306,827  
    F&D capital expenditures (58,310 ) (58,166 ) (273,084 ) (304,637 )
    Free funds flow 13,528   18,049   (36,290 ) 2,190  

    Transportation and Other Expense

    Birchcliff defines “transportation and other expense” as transportation expense plus marketing purchases less marketing revenue. Birchcliff may enter into certain marketing purchase and sales arrangements with the objective of reducing any unused transportation or fractionation fees associated with its take-or-pay commitments and/or increasing the value of its production through value-added downstream initiatives. Management believes that transportation and other expense assists management and investors in assessing Birchcliff’s total cost structure related to transportation and marketing activities.

    The most directly comparable GAAP financial measure to transportation and other expense is transportation expense. The following table provides a reconciliation of transportation expense to transportation and other expense for the periods indicated:

      Three months ended
    December 31,

      Twelve months ended
    December 31,

     
    ($000s) 2024   2023   2024   2023  
    Transportation expense 36,722   38,509   149,534   152,828  
    Marketing purchases 14,905   8,928   51,496   34,772  
    Marketing revenue (14,083 ) (8,532 ) (54,069 ) (30,521 )
    Transportation and other expense 37,544   38,905   146,961   157,079  

    Operating Netback

    Birchcliff defines “operating netback” as petroleum and natural gas revenue less royalty expense, operating expense and transportation and other expense. Management believes that operating netback assists management and investors in assessing Birchcliff’s operating profits after deducting the cash costs that are directly associated with the sale of its production, which can then be used to pay other corporate cash costs or satisfy other obligations.

    The following table provides a breakdown of Birchcliff’s operating netback for the periods indicated:

      Three months ended
      Twelve months ended
     
      December 31,
      December 31,
     
    ($000s) 2024   2023   2024   2023   2022  
    Petroleum and natural gas revenue 153,741   183,295   586,856   740,359   1,340,180  
    Royalty expense (9,033 ) (19,400 ) (39,608 ) (70,257 ) (161,226 )
    Operating expense (20,758 ) (26,808 ) (90,890 ) (105,809 ) (101,581 )
    Transportation and other expense (37,544 ) (38,905 ) (146,961 ) (157,079 ) (154,924 )
    Operating netback 86,406   98,182   309,397   407,214   922,449  

    FD&A and Total Capital Expenditures

    Birchcliff defines “FD&A capital expenditures” as exploration and development expenditures, less dispositions, plus acquisitions (if any). Birchcliff defines “total capital expenditures” as FD&A capital expenditures plus administrative assets. Management believes that FD&A capital expenditures and total capital expenditures assist management and investors in assessing Birchcliff’s overall capital cost structure associated with its petroleum and natural gas activities.

    The most directly comparable GAAP financial measure to FD&A capital expenditures and total capital expenditures is exploration and development expenditures. The following table provides a reconciliation of exploration and development expenditures to FD&A capital expenditures and total capital expenditures for the periods indicated:

      Three months ended
      Twelve months ended
     
      December 31,
      December 31,
     
    ($000s) 2024   2023   2024   2023  
    Exploration and development expenditures(1) 58,310   58,166   273,084   304,637  
    Acquisitions 8,076   2   8,169   190  
    Dispositions (100 ) (10 ) (258 ) (87 )
    FD&A capital expenditures 66,286   58,158   280,995   304,740  
    Administrative assets 387   1,383   1,750   3,176  
    Total capital expenditures 66,673   59,541   282,745   307,916  

    (1)  Disclosed as F&D capital expenditures elsewhere in this press release. See “Advisories – F&D Capital Expenditures”.

    Net Asset Value

    Birchcliff defines “net asset value” as property, plant and equipment, plus reserves premium adjustment (less reserves discount adjustment) for its PDP, total proved and total proved plus probable reserves (as the case may be), less total debt and plus the value of unexercised in-the-money stock options and performance warrants outstanding at the end of the period. Management believes that net asset value assists management and investors in assessing the long-term fair value of Birchcliff’s underlying reserves assets after settling its outstanding financial obligations.

    The most directly comparable GAAP financial measure to net asset value is property, plant and equipment. The following table provides a reconciliation of property, plant and equipment to net asset value for the periods indicated:

      Proved Developed Producing Total Proved Total Proved Plus Probable
    As at December 31, ($000s) 2024   2023   2024   2023   2024   2023  
    Property, plant and equipment 3,218,506   3,055,958   3,218,506   3,055,958   3,218,506   3,055,958  
    Reserves premium (discount) adjustment(1) (940,756 ) (435,894 ) 1,140,662   2,349,659   2,345,325   3,779,459  
    Total debt (535,557 ) (382,306 ) (535,557 ) (382,306 ) (535,557 ) (382,306 )
    Unexercised securities 34,961   16,717   34,961   16,717   34,961   16,717  
    Net asset value 1,777,154   2,254,475   3,858,572   5,040,028   5,063,235   6,469,828  

    (1)  Represents the premium or discount, as the case may be, between the net present value of future net revenue (before income taxes, discounted at 10%) of Birchcliff’s PDP, total proved and total proved plus probable reserves, as the case may be, and the property, plant and equipment disclosed on the financial statements.

    Effective Sales – Total Corporate, Total Natural Gas, AECO Market and NYMEX HH Market

    Birchcliff defines “effective sales” in the AECO market and NYMEX HH market as the sales amount received from the production of natural gas that is effectively attributed to the AECO and NYMEX HH market pricing, respectively, and does not consider the physical sales delivery point in each case. Effective sales in the NYMEX HH market includes realized gains and losses on financial instruments and excludes the notional fixed basis costs associated with the underlying financial contract in the period. Birchcliff defines “effective total natural gas sales” as the aggregate of the effective sales amount received in each natural gas market. Birchcliff defines “effective total corporate sales” as the aggregate of the effective total natural gas sales and the sales amount received from the production of light oil, condensate and NGLs. Management believes that disclosing the effective sales for each natural gas market assists management and investors in assessing Birchcliff’s natural gas diversification and commodity price exposure to each market.

    The most directly comparable GAAP financial measure to effective total natural gas sales and effective total corporate sales is natural gas sales. The following table provides a reconciliation of natural gas sales to effective total natural gas sales and effective total corporate sales for the periods indicated:

      Three months ended
     
      December 31,
     
    ($000s) 2024 2023  
    Natural gas sales 79,615 99,957  
    Realized gain (loss) on financial instruments 12,022 (2,583 )
    Notional fixed basis costs(1) 21,490 20,802  
    Effective total natural gas sales 113,127 118,176  
    Light oil sales 17,450 15,180  
    Condensate sales 37,985 49,135  
    NGLs sales 18,679 18,977  
    Effective total corporate sales 187,241 201,468  

    (1)  Reflects the aggregate notional fixed basis cost associated with Birchcliff’s financial and physical NYMEX HH/AECO 7A basis swap contracts in the period.

    Non-GAAP Ratios

    NI 52-112 defines a non-GAAP ratio as a financial measure that: (i) is in the form of a ratio, fraction, percentage or similar representation; (ii) has a non-GAAP financial measure as one or more of its components; and (iii) is not disclosed in the financial statements of the entity. The non-GAAP ratios used in this press release are not standardized financial measures under GAAP and might not be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies. Set forth below is a description of the non-GAAP ratios used in this press release.

    Adjusted Funds Flow Per Boe and Adjusted Funds Flow Per Basic Common Share

    Birchcliff calculates “adjusted funds flow per boe” as aggregate adjusted funds flow in the period divided by the production (boe) in the period. Management believes that adjusted funds flow per boe assists management and investors in assessing Birchcliff’s financial profitability and sustainability on a cash basis by isolating the impact of production volumes to better analyze its performance against prior periods on a comparable basis.

    Birchcliff calculates “adjusted funds flow per basic common share” as aggregate adjusted funds flow in the period divided by the weighted average basic common shares outstanding at the end of the period. Management believes that adjusted funds flow per basic common share assists management and investors in assessing Birchcliff’s financial strength on a per common share basis.

    Free Funds Flow Per Basic Common Share

    Birchcliff calculates “free funds flow per basic common share” as aggregate free funds flow in the period divided by the weighted average basic common shares outstanding at the end of the period. Management believes that free funds flow per basic common share assists management and investors in assessing Birchcliff’s financial strength and its ability to deliver shareholder returns on a per common share basis.

    Transportation and Other Expense Per Boe

    Birchcliff calculates “transportation and other expense per boe” as aggregate transportation and other expense in the period divided by the production (boe) in the period. Management believes that transportation and other expense per boe assists management and investors in assessing Birchcliff’s cost structure as it relates to its transportation and marketing activities by isolating the impact of production volumes to better analyze its performance against prior periods on a comparable basis.

    Operating Netback Per Boe

    Birchcliff calculates “operating netback per boe” as aggregate operating netback in the period divided by the production (boe) in the period. Operating netback per boe is a key industry performance indicator and one that provides investors with information that is commonly presented by other oil and natural gas producers. Management believes that operating netback per boe assists management and investors in assessing Birchcliff’s operating profitability and sustainability by isolating the impact of production volumes to better analyze its performance against prior periods on a comparable basis.

    Operating Netback Recycle Ratio

    Birchcliff calculates “operating netback recycle ratio” as operating netback per boe in the period divided by F&D or FD&A costs, as the case may be, for its PDP, proved and proved plus probable reserves, as the case may be, in the period. Management believes that operating netback recycle ratio assists management and investors in assessing Birchcliff’s ability to profitably find and develop its PDP, proved and proved plus probable reserves.

    Net Asset Value Per Common Share

    Birchcliff calculates “net asset value per common share” as the net asset value in each category of reserves divided by the aggregate of the basic common shares outstanding and in-the-money dilutive common shares attributable to stock options and performance warrants outstanding at the end of the period. Management believes that net asset value per common share assists management and investors in comparing Birchcliff’s common share trading price to the underlying fair market value of its net assets on a per common share basis.

    Effective Average Realized Sales Price – Total Corporate, Total Natural Gas, AECO Market and NYMEX HH Market

    Birchcliff calculates “effective average realized sales price” as effective sales, in each of total corporate, total natural gas, AECO market and NYMEX HH market, as the case may be, divided by the effective production in each of the markets during the period. Management believes that disclosing the effective average realized sales price for each natural gas market assists management and investors in comparing Birchcliff’s commodity price realizations in each natural gas market on a per unit basis.

    Capital Management Measures

    NI 52-112 defines a capital management measure as a financial measure that: (i) is intended to enable an individual to evaluate an entity’s objectives, policies and processes for managing the entity’s capital; (ii) is not a component of a line item disclosed in the primary financial statements of the entity; (iii) is disclosed in the notes to the financial statements of the entity; and (iv) is not disclosed in the primary financial statements of the entity. Set forth below is a description of the capital management measure used in this press release.

    Total Debt

    Birchcliff calculates “total debt” at the end of the period as the amount outstanding under the Corporation’s Credit Facilities plus working capital deficit (less working capital surplus) plus the fair value of the current asset portion of financial instruments less the fair value of the current liability portion of financial instruments and less the current portion of other liabilities discounted to the end of the period. The current portion of other liabilities has been excluded from total debt as these amounts have not been incurred and reflect future commitments in the normal course of operations. Management believes that total debt assists management and investors in assessing Birchcliff’s overall liquidity and financial position at the end of the period. The following table provides a reconciliation of the amount outstanding under the Credit Facilities, as determined in accordance with GAAP, to total debt for the periods indicated:

    As at December 31, ($000s) 2024   2023  
    Revolving term credit facilities 566,857   372,097  
    Working capital deficit (surplus)(1) (88,953 ) 10,522  
    Fair value of financial instruments – asset(2) 71,038   3,588  
    Fair value of financial instruments – liability(2) –   (1,394 )
    Other liabilities(2) (13,385 ) (2,507 )
    Total debt 535,557   382,306  

    (1)  Current liabilities less current assets.

    (2)  Reflects the current portion only.

    PRESENTATION OF OIL AND GAS RESERVES

    Deloitte prepared the Deloitte Report and the 2023 Deloitte Report. In addition, Deloitte prepared a reserves evaluation in respect of Birchcliff’s oil and natural gas properties effective December 31, 2022. Such evaluations were prepared in accordance with the standards contained in NI 51-101 and the COGE Handbook that were in effect at the relevant time. Reserves estimates stated herein are extracted from the relevant evaluation.

    There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities of oil, natural gas and NGLs (including condensate) reserves and the future net revenue attributed to such reserves. The reserves and associated future net revenue information set forth in this press release are estimates only. In general, estimates of economically recoverable oil, natural gas and NGLs reserves and the future net revenue therefrom are based upon a number of variable factors and assumptions, such as historical production from the properties, production rates, ultimate reserves recovery, the timing and amount of capital expenditures, marketability of oil, natural gas and NGLs, royalty rates, the assumed effects of regulation by governmental agencies and future operating costs, all of which may vary materially from actual results. For these reasons, estimates of the economically recoverable oil, natural gas and NGLs reserves attributable to any particular group of properties, the classification of such reserves based on risk of recovery and estimates of future net revenue associated with reserves prepared by different engineers, or by the same engineer at different times, may vary. Birchcliff’s actual production, revenue, taxes and development and operating expenditures with respect to its reserves will vary from estimates thereof and such variations could be material.

    It should not be assumed that the undiscounted or discounted net present value of future net revenue attributable to the Corporation’s reserves estimated by the Corporation’s independent qualified reserves evaluator represent the fair market value of those reserves. There is no assurance that the forecast prices and costs assumptions will be attained and variances could be material. Actual oil, natural gas and NGLs reserves may be greater than or less than the estimates provided herein and variances could be material.

    In this press release, unless otherwise stated all references to “reserves” are to Birchcliff’s gross company reserves, meaning Birchcliff’s working interest (operating or non-operating) share before the deduction of royalties and without including any royalty interests of Birchcliff.

    The information set forth in this press release relating to the reserves, future net revenue and future development costs of Birchcliff constitutes forward-looking statements and is subject to certain risks and uncertainties. See “Advisories – Forward-Looking Statements”.

    Certain terms used herein but not defined are defined in NI 51-101, CSA Staff Notice 51-324 – Revised Glossary to NI 51-101 Standards of Disclosure for Oil and Gas Activities (“CSA Staff Notice 51-324”) and/or the COGE Handbook and, unless the context otherwise requires, shall have the same meanings herein as in NI 51-101, CSA Staff Notice 51-324 and the COGE Handbook, as the case may be.

    ADVISORIES

    Unaudited Information

    All financial information contained in this press release for the fourth quarter and year ended December 31, 2024 is based on unaudited estimated financial information which has been disclosed in accordance with GAAP. These estimated results have not been reviewed by the Corporation’s auditor and are subject to change upon completion of the audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2024, and changes could be material. Birchcliff anticipates filing its audited financial statements and related management’s discussion and analysis for the year ended December 31, 2024 on SEDAR+ on March 12, 2025.

    Currency

    Unless otherwise indicated, all dollar amounts are expressed in Canadian dollars, all references to “$” and “CDN$” are to Canadian dollars and all references to “US$” are to United States dollars.

    Boe Conversions

    Boe amounts have been calculated by using the conversion ratio of 6 Mcf of natural gas to 1 bbl of oil. Boe amounts may be misleading, particularly if used in isolation. A boe conversion ratio of 6 Mcf: 1 bbl is based on an energy equivalency conversion method primarily applicable at the burner tip and does not represent a value equivalency at the wellhead. Given that the value ratio based on the current price of crude oil as compared to natural gas is significantly different from the energy equivalency of 6:1, utilizing a conversion on a 6:1 basis may be misleading as an indication of value.

    MMBtu Pricing Conversions

    $1.00 per MMBtu equals $1.00 per Mcf based on a standard heat value Mcf.

    Oil and Gas Metrics

    This press release contains metrics commonly used in the oil and natural gas industry, including F&D costs, FD&A costs, reserves replacement, reserves life index, capital efficiency, operating netback, operating netback recycle ratio, net asset value and net asset value per common share, which have been determined by Birchcliff as set out below. These oil and gas metrics do not have any standardized meanings or standard methods of calculation and therefore may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies. As such, they should not be used to make comparisons. Management uses these oil and gas metrics for its own performance measurements and to provide investors with measures to compare Birchcliff’s performance over time; however, such measures are not reliable indicators of Birchcliff’s future performance, which may not compare to Birchcliff’s performance in previous periods, and therefore should not be unduly relied upon.

    • With respect to F&D and FD&A costs:
      • F&D costs for PDP, proved or proved plus probable reserves, as the case may be, are calculated by taking the sum of: (i) exploration and development expenditures (F&D capital expenditures) incurred in the period; and (ii) where appropriate, the change during the period in FDC for the reserves category; divided by the applicable additions to the reserves category after adding back production in the period. F&D costs exclude the effects of acquisitions and dispositions.
      • FD&A costs for PDP, proved or proved plus probable reserves, as the case may be, are calculated by taking the sum of: (i) FD&A capital expenditures incurred in the period; and (ii) where appropriate, the change during the period in FDC for the reserves category; divided by the applicable additions to the reserves category after adding back production in the period.
      • In determining the F&D and FD&A costs for PDP, proved or proved plus probable reserves, as the case may be, the estimated reserves additions during the period and the change during the period in estimated FDC are based upon the evaluations of Birchcliff’s reserves prepared by its independent qualified reserves evaluator effective December 31 of such year.
      • The aggregate of the F&D and FD&A capital expenditures incurred in the most recent financial year and the change during that year in estimated FDC generally will not reflect total F&D and FD&A costs related to reserves additions for that year.
      • F&D and FD&A costs may be used as a measure of the Corporation’s efficiency with respect to finding and developing its reserves.
    • Reserves replacement on an F&D basis is calculated by dividing PDP, proved or proved plus probable reserves additions, as the case may be, before production by the total annual production in the applicable period. Reserves replacement on an FD&A basis is calculated in the same manner as F&D reserves replacement, but include the effects of acquisitions and dispositions. Reserves replacement may be used as a measure of the Corporation’s sustainability and its ability to replace its PDP, proved or proved plus probable reserves, as the case may be.
    • Reserves life index is calculated by dividing PDP, proved or proved plus probable reserves, as the case may be, estimated by Deloitte at December 31, 2024, by 77,500 boe/d (which represents the mid-point of Birchcliff’s annual average production guidance range for 2025) determined on an annualized basis. Reserves life index may be used as a measure of the Corporation’s sustainability.
    • Capital efficiency is calculated on an average well basis as drill, case, complete and equip capital expenditures divided by the IP365 boe/d for the applicable well(s). Birchcliff defines “IP365 boe/d” as the estimated average daily field production in the first 365 days a well is on-stream. Where field production data is not available for a well, Birchcliff uses the forecasted production data for that well. Capital efficiency is determined at the individual well level and then aggregated and averaged for the year. Management believes that capital efficiency assists management and investors in assessing Birchcliff’s asset performance, execution and ability to generate shareholder value.
    • For information regarding operating netback, operating netback recycle ratio, net asset value and net asset value per common share and how such metrics are calculated, see “Non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures”.

    Production

    With respect to the disclosure of Birchcliff’s production contained in this press release: (i) references to “light oil” mean “light crude oil and medium crude oil” as such term is defined in NI 51-101; (ii) references to “liquids” mean “light crude oil and medium crude oil” and “natural gas liquids” (including condensate) as such terms are defined in NI 51-101; and (iii) references to “natural gas” mean “shale gas”, which also includes an immaterial amount of “conventional natural gas”, as such terms are defined in NI 51-101. In addition, NI 51-101 includes condensate within the product type of natural gas liquids. In certain cases, Birchcliff has disclosed condensate separately from other natural gas liquids as the price of condensate as compared to other natural gas liquids is currently significantly higher and Birchcliff believes presenting the two commodities separately provides a more accurate description of its operations and results therefrom.

    With respect to the disclosure of Birchcliff’s production contained in this press release, all production volumes have been disclosed on a “gross” basis as such term is defined in NI 51-101, meaning Birchcliff’s working interest (operating or non-operating) share before the deduction of royalties and without including any royalty interests of Birchcliff.

    F&D Capital Expenditures

    Unless otherwise stated, references in this press release to “F&D capital expenditures” denotes exploration and development expenditures as disclosed in the Corporation’s financial statements in accordance with GAAP, and is primarily comprised of capital for land, seismic, workovers, drilling and completions, well equipment and facilities and capitalized G&A costs and excludes any acquisitions, dispositions, administrative assets and the capitalized portion of cash incentive payments that have not been approved by the Board. Management believes that F&D capital expenditures assists management and investors in assessing Birchcliff’s capital cost outlay associated with its exploration and development activities for the purposes of finding and developing its reserves.

    Forward-Looking Statements

    Certain statements contained in this press release constitute forward‐looking statements and forward-looking information (collectively referred to as “forward‐looking statements”) within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities laws. The forward-looking statements contained in this press release relate to future events or Birchcliff’s future plans, strategy, operations, performance or financial position and are based on Birchcliff’s current expectations, estimates, projections, beliefs and assumptions. Such forward-looking statements have been made by Birchcliff in light of the information available to it at the time the statements were made and reflect its experience and perception of historical trends. All statements and information other than historical fact may be forward‐looking statements. Such forward‐looking statements are often, but not always, identified by the use of words such as “seek”, “plan”, “focus”, “future”, “outlook”, “position”, “expect”, “project”, “intend”, “believe”, “anticipate”, “estimate”, “forecast”, “guidance”, “potential”, “proposed”, “predict”, “budget”, “continue”, “targeting”, “may”, “will”, “could”, “might”, “should”, “would”, “on track”, “maintain”, “deliver” and other similar words and expressions.

    By their nature, forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results or events to differ materially from those anticipated in such forward‐looking statements. Accordingly, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. Although Birchcliff believes that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, there can be no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct and Birchcliff makes no representation that actual results achieved will be the same in whole or in part as those set out in the forward-looking statements.

    In particular, this press release contains forward‐looking statements relating to:

    • Birchcliff’s plans and other aspects of its anticipated future financial performance, results, operations, focus, objectives, strategies, opportunities, priorities and goals, including: Birchcliff’s belief that there is significant intrinsic shareholder value embedded in Birchcliff’s asset base that is not reflected in its current share price, as demonstrated by its PDP reserves net asset value per common share of $6.35 and $13.79 and $18.09 per share for its proved and proved plus probable reserves, respectively; that Birchcliff’s Elmworth asset provides Birchcliff with significant inventory and a large potential future development area; that Birchcliff’s strategy for 2025 builds off of the operational momentum from 2024, maintaining the Corporation’s focus on capital efficiency improvements and further driving down costs; that the Corporation’s 2025 capital program has been designed to ensure that its capital is strategically deployed throughout the year, providing it with the flexibility to adjust its capital spending if necessary in response to the commodity price volatility expected during 2025, including as a result of the potential for U.S. and Canadian tariffs and the start-up of LNG Canada; that the unutilized credit capacity under its Credit Facilities provides Birchcliff with significant financial flexibility and available capital resources; that Birchcliff believes its ongoing strategy of maintaining significant natural gas market diversification for 2025 will continue to protect the Corporation from volatility in the North American natural gas pricing environment, including as it relates to potential tariffs; and estimates of Birchcliff’s 2025 market diversification (including that approximately 41% of Birchcliff’s natural gas production is physically delivered to the Dawn trading hub in Ontario and that Birchcliff has U.S. denominated financial contracts that expose approximately 35% of its natural gas production to NYMEX HH pricing on a financial basis);
    • the information set forth under the heading “Update on 2025 Capital Program” and elsewhere in this press release regarding Birchcliff’s 2025 capital program and its exploration, production and development activities and the timing thereof, including: estimates of the Corporation’s 2025 F&D capital expenditures; that the wells in Birchcliff’s 2025 capital program are expected to yield strong production, using the Corporation’s latest field development practices and wellbore design, which incorporates longer lateral lengths, reduced stage spacing and increased proppant loading where appropriate; that the land retention well drilled and completed by the Corporation in Elmworth is not currently planned to be tied in; the targeted product types; and the expected timing for wells to be drilled, completed and brought on production;
    • statements regarding U.S. and Canadian tariffs, including that the Corporation believes that Canada’s over-reliance on exporting its energy into the U.S. must be addressed through the reduction of red tape and government interference in the construction of critical infrastructure such as oil and gas pipelines to the east and west coasts of Canada, LNG terminals on each coast and an increase in refining capacity within Canada, in order to diversify Canada’s energy export market; and that the Corporation continues to actively monitor this situation;
    • the information set forth under the heading “2024 Year-End Reserves” and elsewhere in this press release regarding the Corporation’s reserves, including: estimates of reserves; estimates of the net present values of future net revenue associated with Birchcliff’s reserves; forecasts of prices, inflation and exchange rates; FDC; reserves life index; and that the Corporation does not expect that the technical revisions relating to the 56 high-density wells drilled from 2019 to 2023 will negatively impact future reserves booked for other existing or future wells;
    • the performance and other characteristics of Birchcliff’s oil and natural gas properties and expected results from its assets, including statements regarding the potential or prospectivity of Birchcliff’s properties; and
    • that Birchcliff anticipates filing its annual information form and audited financial statements and related management’s discussion and analysis for the year ended December 31, 2024 on March 12, 2025.

    Information relating to reserves is forward-looking as it involves the implied assessment, based on certain estimates and assumptions, that the reserves exist in the quantities predicted or estimated and that the reserves can profitably be produced in the future. See “Presentation of Oil and Gas Reserves”.

    With respect to the forward-looking statements contained in this press release, assumptions have been made regarding, among other things: prevailing and future commodity prices and differentials, exchange rates, interest rates, inflation rates, royalty rates and tax rates; the state of the economy, financial markets and the exploration, development and production business; the political environment in which Birchcliff operates; the regulatory framework regarding royalties, taxes, environmental, climate change and other laws; the Corporation’s ability to comply with existing and future laws; future cash flow, debt and dividend levels; future operating, transportation, G&A and other expenses; Birchcliff’s ability to access capital and obtain financing on acceptable terms; the timing and amount of capital expenditures and the sources of funding for capital expenditures and other activities; the sufficiency of budgeted capital expenditures to carry out planned operations; the successful and timely implementation of capital projects and the timing, location and extent of future drilling and other operations; results of operations; Birchcliff’s ability to continue to develop its assets and obtain the anticipated benefits therefrom; the performance of existing and future wells; reserves volumes and Birchcliff’s ability to replace and expand reserves through acquisition, development or exploration; the impact of competition on Birchcliff; the availability of, demand for and cost of labour, services and materials; the approval of the Board of future dividends; the ability to obtain any necessary regulatory or other approvals in a timely manner; the satisfaction by third parties of their obligations to Birchcliff; the ability of Birchcliff to secure adequate processing and transportation for its products; Birchcliff’s ability to successfully market natural gas and liquids; the results of the Corporation’s risk management and market diversification activities; and Birchcliff’s natural gas market exposure. In addition to the foregoing assumptions, Birchcliff has made the following assumptions with respect to certain forward-looking statements contained in this press release:

    • Birchcliff’s forecast of F&D capital expenditures assumes that the Corporation’s 2025 capital program will be carried out as currently contemplated and excludes any potential acquisitions, dispositions and the capitalized portion of cash incentive payments that have not been approved by the Board. The amount and allocation of capital expenditures for exploration and development activities by area and the number and types of wells to be drilled and brought on production is dependent upon results achieved and is subject to review and modification by management on an ongoing basis throughout the year. Actual spending may vary due to a variety of factors, including commodity prices, economic conditions, results of operations and costs of labour, services and materials.
    • With respect to estimates of reserves volumes and the net present values of future net revenue associated with Birchcliff’s reserves, the key assumption is the validity of the data used by Deloitte in the Deloitte Report.
    • With respect to statements regarding future wells to be drilled or brought on production, such statements assume: the continuing validity of the geological and other technical interpretations performed by Birchcliff’s technical staff, which indicate that commercially economic volumes can be recovered from Birchcliff’s lands as a result of drilling future wells; and that commodity prices and general economic conditions will warrant proceeding with the drilling of such wells.

    Birchcliff’s actual results, performance or achievements could differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements as a result of both known and unknown risks and uncertainties including, but not limited to: general economic, market and business conditions which will, among other things, impact the demand for and market prices of Birchcliff’s products and Birchcliff’s access to capital; volatility of crude oil and natural gas prices; risks associated with increasing costs, whether due to high inflation rates, supply chain disruptions or other factors; fluctuations in exchange and interest rates; an inability of Birchcliff to generate sufficient cash flow from operations to meet its current and future obligations; an inability to access sufficient capital from internal and external sources on terms acceptable to the Corporation; risks associated with Birchcliff’s Credit Facilities, including a failure to comply with covenants under the agreement governing the Credit Facilities and the risk that the borrowing base limit may be redetermined; fluctuations in the costs of borrowing; operational risks and liabilities inherent in oil and natural gas operations; the risk that weather events such as wildfires, flooding, droughts or extreme hot or cold temperatures forces the Corporation to shut-in production or otherwise adversely affects the Corporation’s operations; the occurrence of unexpected events such as fires, explosions, blow-outs, equipment failures, transportation incidents and other similar events; an inability to access sufficient water or other fluids needed for operations; the risks associated with supply chain disruptions; uncertainty that development activities in connection with Birchcliff’s assets will be economic; an inability to access or implement some or all of the technology necessary to operate its assets and achieve expected future results; geological, technical, drilling, construction and processing problems; uncertainty of geological and technical data; horizontal drilling and completions techniques and the failure of drilling results to meet expectations for reserves or production; uncertainties related to Birchcliff’s future potential drilling locations; delays or changes in plans with respect to exploration or development projects or capital expenditures; the uncertainty of estimates and projections relating to production, revenue, costs and reserves; the accuracy of cost estimates and variances in Birchcliff’s actual costs and economic returns from those anticipated; incorrect assessments of the value of acquisitions and exploration and development programs; the risks posed by pandemics, epidemics and global conflict and their impacts on supply and demand and commodity prices; actions taken by OPEC and other major producers of crude oil and the impact such actions may have on supply and demand and commodity prices; stock market volatility; loss of market demand; changes to the regulatory framework in the locations where the Corporation operates, including changes to tax laws, Crown royalty rates, environmental laws, climate change laws, carbon tax regimes, incentive programs and other regulations that affect the oil and natural gas industry (including uncertainty with respect to the interpretation of Bill C-59 and the related amendments to the Competition Act (Canada)); political uncertainty and uncertainty associated with government policy changes, including the risk of U.S. tariffs on goods exported from Canada and any retaliatory tariffs implemented; actions by government authorities; an inability of the Corporation to comply with existing and future laws and the cost of compliance with such laws; dependence on facilities, gathering lines and pipelines; uncertainties and risks associated with pipeline restrictions and outages to third-party infrastructure that could cause disruptions to production; the lack of available pipeline capacity and an inability to secure adequate and cost-effective processing and transportation for Birchcliff’s products; an inability to satisfy obligations under Birchcliff’s firm marketing and transportation arrangements; shortages in equipment and skilled personnel; the absence or loss of key employees; competition for, among other things, capital, acquisitions of reserves, undeveloped lands, equipment and skilled personnel; management of Birchcliff’s growth; environmental and climate change risks, claims and liabilities; potential litigation; default under or breach of agreements by counterparties and potential enforceability issues in contracts; claims by Indigenous peoples; the reassessment by taxing or regulatory authorities of the Corporation’s prior transactions and filings; unforeseen title defects; third-party claims regarding the Corporation’s right to use technology and equipment; uncertainties associated with the outcome of litigation or other proceedings involving Birchcliff; uncertainties associated with counterparty credit risk; risks associated with Birchcliff’s risk management and market diversification activities; risks associated with the declaration and payment of future dividends, including the discretion of the Board to declare dividends and change the Corporation’s dividend policy and the risk that the amount of dividends may be less than currently forecast; the failure to obtain any required approvals in a timely manner or at all; the failure to complete or realize the anticipated benefits of acquisitions and dispositions and the risk of unforeseen difficulties in integrating acquired assets into Birchcliff’s operations; negative public perception of the oil and natural gas industry and fossil fuels; the Corporation’s reliance on hydraulic fracturing; market competition, including from alternative energy sources; changing demand for petroleum products; the availability of insurance and the risk that certain losses may not be insured; breaches or failure of information systems and security (including risks associated with cyber-attacks); risks associated with the ownership of the Corporation’s securities; the accuracy of the Corporation’s accounting estimates and judgments; and the risk that any of the Corporation’s material assumptions prove to be materially inaccurate.

    Readers are cautioned that the foregoing lists of factors are not exhaustive. Additional information on these and other risk factors that could affect Birchcliff’s results of operations, financial performance or financial results are included in Birchcliff’s annual information form and annual management’s discussion and analysis for the financial year ended December 31, 2023 under the heading “Risk Factors” and in other reports filed with Canadian securities regulatory authorities.

    This press release contains information that may constitute future-oriented financial information or financial outlook information (collectively, “FOFI”) about Birchcliff’s prospective financial performance, financial position or cash flows, all of which is subject to the same assumptions, risk factors, limitations and qualifications as set forth above. Readers are cautioned that the assumptions used in the preparation of such information, although considered reasonable at the time of preparation, may prove to be imprecise or inaccurate and, as such, undue reliance should not be placed on FOFI. Birchcliff’s actual results, performance and achievements could differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, FOFI. Birchcliff has included FOFI in order to provide readers with a more complete perspective on Birchcliff’s future operations and management’s current expectations relating to Birchcliff’s future performance. Readers are cautioned that such information may not be appropriate for other purposes.

    Management has included the above summary of assumptions and risks related to forward-looking statements provided in this press release in order to provide readers with a more complete perspective on Birchcliff’s future operations and management’s current expectations relating to Birchcliff’s future performance. Readers are cautioned that this information may not be appropriate for other purposes.

    The forward-looking statements and FOFI contained in this press release are expressly qualified by the foregoing cautionary statements. The forward-looking statements and FOFI contained herein are made as of the date of this press release. Unless required by applicable laws, Birchcliff does not undertake any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements or FOFI, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

    ABOUT BIRCHCLIFF:

    Birchcliff is an intermediate oil and natural gas company based in Calgary, Alberta with operations focused on the Montney/Doig Resource Play in Alberta. Birchcliff’s common shares are listed for trading on the TSX under the symbol “BIR”.

    For further information, please contact:
    Birchcliff Energy Ltd.
    Suite 1000, 600 – 3rd Avenue S.W.
    Calgary, Alberta T2P 0G5
    Telephone: (403) 261-6401
    Email: birinfo@birchcliffenergy.com
    www.birchcliffenergy.com
      Chris Carlsen – President and Chief Executive Officer

    Bruno Geremia – Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

    The MIL Network –

    February 13, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: ConnectM Raises Q4 ‘24 Revenue Guidance to $9M, Up 102% Year-over-Year, Surpassing Prior Estimates by $2M

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    ~Revised FY2024 revenue guidance is $26.3M instead of previous guidance of $24M

    ~Company expects to provide Q1 ‘25 guidance in the next two weeks~

    MARLBOROUGH, Mass., Feb. 12, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — ConnectM Technology Solutions, Inc. (NASDAQ: CNTM) (“ConnectM” or the “Company”), a technology company focused on the electrification economy, today announced a significant upward revision to its previously announced Q4 2024 preliminary revenue guidance of $7 million. The Company now anticipates Q4 2024 revenue of approximately $9 million, a 102% increase compared to $4.5 million revenue in Q4 2023.

    The revised Q4 ’24 guidance elevates ConnectM’s full-year 2024 revenue projection to $26.3 million, reflecting 33% year-over-year growth compared to full-year 2023. This performance underscores the Company’s accelerating momentum in delivering innovative technology solutions and capturing market share across its core verticals.

    Strategic Drivers of Growth
    ConnectM attributes this exceptional growth to increased demand for its proprietary technology platforms, expanded customer acquisitions, and operational efficiencies. The Company’s ability to exceed previous forecasts highlights the success of its strategic focus on customer-centric solutions.

    Bhaskar Panigrahi, Chairman and CEO of ConnectM, stated: “Today’s upward revision is a testament to the relentless execution of our team and the scalability of our solutions in a dynamic market environment. Achieving 102% year-over-year growth in Q4—surpassing our initial expectations—demonstrates the power of our innovation and the trust our customers place in ConnectM. As we close out 2024, we are not only celebrating a record year but also laying the groundwork for sustained growth and value creation for our stockholders in 2025 and beyond.”

    About ConnectM Technology Solutions, Inc.
    ConnectM is a pioneer in the electrification economy, integrating energy assets with its AI-driven technology platform. Focused on delivering solutions that drive efficiency, affordability, and sustainability, ConnectM serves home, facility, and fleet across three major segments: Building Electrification, Distributed Energy, and Transportation and Logistics. The company’s vertically integrated approach combines technology, service/distribution networks, and strategic partnerships to accelerate the transition to an all-electric energy economy.

    For more information, please visit: www.connectm.com. Stockholders looking to receive Company updates directly to their inbox should sign up here.  

    Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
    This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). We have based these forward-looking statements on our current expectations and projections about future events. All statements, other than statements of present or historical fact included in this press release, regarding our future financial performance and our strategy, expansion plans, future operations, future operating results, estimated revenues, losses, projected costs, prospects, plans and objectives of management are forward-looking statements. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “believe,” “estimate,” “continue,” “project” or the negative of such terms or other similar expressions. These forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and assumptions about us that may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Except as otherwise required by applicable law, we disclaim any duty to update any forward-looking statements, all of which are expressly qualified by the statements in this section, to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this press release. We caution you that the forward-looking statements contained herein are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, most of which are difficult to predict and many of which are beyond our control. In addition, we caution you that the forward-looking statements regarding the Company contained in this press release are subject to the risks and uncertainties described in the “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” section of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 18, 2024. Such filing identifies and addresses other important risks and uncertainties that could cause actual events and results to differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made. Readers are cautioned not to put undue reliance on forward-looking statements, and ConnectM is under no obligation to update or revise these forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.

    Contact:
    Investor Relations
    Dave Gentry, CEO
    RedChip Companies, Inc.
    1-407-644-4256
    CNTM@redchip.com

    The MIL Network –

    February 13, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Chairman Capito Opening Statement at Hearing on Advancing CCUS Technology, Proper Implementation of USE IT Act

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for West Virginia Shelley Moore Capito
    [embedded content]
    To watch Chairman Capito’s opening statement, click here or the image above.
    WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, U.S. Senator Shelley Moore Capito (R-W.Va.), Chairman of the Senate Environment and Public Works (EPW) Committee, held a hearing on advancing carbon capture, utilization, and sequestration (CCUS) technologies, and examining the implementation of the Utilizing Significant Emissions with Innovative Technologies Act or USE IT Act. The EPW Committee led efforts to get the USE IT Act signed into law in December 2020. 
    In her opening remarks, Chairman Capito spoke to the bipartisan support for CCUS technology and the need to continue efforts to advance these technologies, while emphasizing the importance of implementing the USE IT Act at a faster pace. Additionally, Chairman Capito highlighted the significance of timely project approval and Class VI well primacy for states, as well as the role of CCUS in ensuring a reliable electric grid.
    Below is the opening statement of Chairman Shelley Moore Capito (R-W.Va.) as delivered.
    “I’m excited to start this year with a hearing on a bipartisan topic that Ranking Member Whitehouse and I have worked together on over the years to address, and I look forward to continuing bipartisan efforts to champion meaningful legislation on this issue with Ranking Member Whitehouse and the rest of the Committee. Certainly, [Senator Cramer] knows a lot about this at the same time in the great state of North Dakota. Innovative CCUS technologies will play a critical role in reducing emissions, particularly for facilities that face unique challenges because of their size, location, or industrial application.
    “In my state of West Virginia, several CCUS efforts are underway. West Virginia University is currently exploring direct air capture technologies, and the Department of Energy’s National Energy Technology Laboratory, which is located in Morgantown, is supporting a suite of CCUS research.
    “West Virginia is also a partner in the Appalachian Regional Clean Hydrogen Hub –known as ARCH2 – that includes project partners who are working to deploy CCUS technologies. Collectively, these projects position West Virginia to continue as a national energy leader, while also reducing our air emissions.
    “But, we cannot realize the full benefits of these projects and emerging technologies like CCUS if there is not a permitting framework that will allow for the rapid and safe deployment of these projects. That’s why Ranking Member Whitehouse and I, working together with Senator Barrasso and former Senator Carper, moved forward to get the Utilizing Significant Emissions with Innovative Technologies Act – or the USE IT Act – signed into law in December of 2020.
    “This legislation was intended to ensure that carbon capture projects, at all types of facilities, can be permitted in a timely and efficient manner. Despite the progress made by the USE IT Act, there have been significant problems with its implementation that have held back the deployment and the development of CCUS.
    “First, while the Council on Environmental Quality – or CEQ – released a report in 2021 and subsequent interagency guidance for the deployment of CCUS in 2022, as the USE IT Act required, the guidance failed to present a clear pathway to expedite permitting for these projects. 
    “Second, the law required at least two federal tasks forces be established to help identify challenges to and solutions for permitting these projects. The Department of Energy and CEQ missed the required 18-month deadline to establish these tasks forces. 
    “They were not chartered until April of 2024, more than twice as long as the Congress mandated in the USE IT Act. The delay in standing up these task forces has hindered our progress in supporting CCUS, but at least they are finally working on recommendations to improve the permitting process.
    “After the USE IT Act, Congress and the EPW Committee worked in a bipartisan way to expedite carbon capture projects by including $25 million in the IIJA for the EPA to review and approve Class VI well applications.
    “The IIJA also included $50 million to help our states obtain primacy for permitting such Class VI wells. This funding gave the EPA needed resources to clear its backlog of individual Class VI applications, and reduce the total number of applications that the EPA must review by granting states primacy. 
    “Despite receiving additional help and funding with the process, the Biden administration only approved two Class VI projects, and only granted primacy to two states, Louisiana, and after more than three and half years…my home state, really the last day of the Biden administration, received their permit for primacy on Class VI wells.
    “I’m very excited that [West Virginia] got our primacy over that permitting process. I hope EPA Administrator Zeldin will prioritize reducing the current backlog of pending applications and support additional states that are seeking to obtain primacy.
    “The North American Electric Reliability Corporation has found that over the next ten years, due to a rise in energy consumption and the early retirement of our existing fossil fuel generation, our country could face major electric reliability concerns.  
    “The deployment of CCUS can be a tool to not only maintain, but expand reliable electric generation capacity and ensure the reliability of our electric grid, while improving the environment and growing our economy. I believe that’s a win-win situation.
    “I look forward to our discussion today on this important topic, so we can figure out how we can continue to work in a bipartisan manner to advance CCUS deployment.”

    MIL OSI USA News –

    February 13, 2025
  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Speech to New Zealand Economics Forum

    Source: New Zealand Government

    Tēna koutou katoa. Greetings everyone.
    Thank you Matt for the introduction and can I acknowledge the presence of former Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison. It’s a pleasure to have you back in the country.
    It’s also a pleasure to be here to speak at this event for the third year in a row. 
    The world is changing. Fast. Orthodoxies are being challenged. De-globalisation, tariffs, counter tariffs, artificial intelligence, conflict, cynicism about national institutions, extreme climatic events, increasing competition for food, energy, minerals and other resources.  
    Leaders around the world are being compelled to act more boldly than they have for several decades.
    Where once countries could take for granted their position in the world, it is now unquestionable that we need to place ourselves in the driver’s seat for our national interests.
    These issues are not just the concern of diplomats, leaders and elites.  
    People the world over are increasingly feeling the effects of declining living standards, soaring prices, unaffordable housing and incomes that are not  keeping up. 
    Is it any wonder that there is a growing sense that the benefits of progress are not being evenly shared or that citizens are questioning the institutions and conventions they were raised to rely on?  
    It’s hard not to look back on the past few decades and see complacency. 
    Where once there was an assumption about the inevitability of economic growth – a given to be traded off against a host of other values – that stance now seems blissfully naïve.  
    From the United Kingdom, to the European Union, to China, to the United States, there is a growing realisation that growth must be fought for and that, even once achieved, can easily slide away.
    We in New Zealand are not immune to these trends. In fact, we are at a moment of inflection.  
    After three years of struggle, many Kiwis feel poorer, less financially secure and less hopeful about their futures. The cost of living is a daily concern.
    New Zealanders have been through the wringer. Where once there was triumphalism about our response to, and recovery, from the COVID-19 pandemic, there is now a realisation that we are still paying the economic price for the disruption it wreaked.  
    The aftershocks of extended lock-downs included a generational spike in inflation and the cost of living, extraordinary interest rate hikes, ongoing disruption to migration flows, massive increases in Government debt and a structural deficit in the government books.  
    These blows landed on an economy that had being showing cracks for decades. 
    New Zealand already faced longstanding issues of low productivity growth, low capital intensity in our firms, low levels of competition in many sectors, challenges in attracting and retaining skills and talent, low uptake of innovation, declining housing affordability and a growing tail of New Zealanders leaving school without basic skills. Today, as Kiwis suffer the real-life effects of economic problems, it’s become even more urgent that we address these complex challenges. 
    For the economists in this room these observations about our economic problems can be understood as data points.
    For many Kiwis, it is more personal, more visceral and far harder to stomach. The cost of living is too high and they need to see a path out.
    Despite falling inflation and interest rates and rising business and consumer confidence, many New Zealanders tell me they still can’t get on top of their bills – even though they’re working harder than ever, that they are worried about whether they’ve saved enough for their retirement, and are concerned about their kids’ prospects should they stay in New Zealand.
    My message to those New Zealanders is this: it’s tough right now, but our country has far better years ahead of it.  
    It’s easy to lose sight of the reasons to be optimistic, but let’s be confident about how great New Zealand’s potential is.
    In a world facing multiple challenges, we have some extraordinary advantages. We’re a safe, secure country with established trading relationships and a reputation as a good place to do business. We are blessed with abundant natural resources – everything from ocean to freshwater, fertile land to minerals and temperate weather. 
    In a world worried about food security, we have the world’s best farmers, feeding more than 40 million people with levels of efficiency and sustainability that are the envy of the world. We have a long history of stable democracy, strong institutions and rule of law. We’ve produced world-leading scientific breakthroughs from splitting the atom to the Hamilton Jet Boat. Our entrepreneurs and innovators have converted their ideas into world-beating successes – from  Oscar-winning digital effects to rockets in space.
    New Zealand has what it takes to succeed, but for too long we’ve put up stop signs and road cones when we should have been putting our pedal to the metal. 
    Our Government’s mission is to make the most of New Zealand’s potential so we can grow the economy and ease the cost of living for New Zealanders. 
    Our plan is simple: remove the barriers that have held back growth and create the conditions that will allow businesses to create better paying jobs, more financial security for our families, and more income to pay for world-class education and health services.
    Today I am releasing a document that shows how our Government is putting that plan into action. “Going for Growth” is a snapshot of the Government’s activity in five key areas, all designed to ease the cost of living and grow our economy.
    The document identifies more than 80 separate initiatives that have been completed or are underway.  Don’t worry, I’m not about to list them all. 
    But I do encourage you to give it a read.  Going for Growth will be updated on a regular basis and we are actively seeking your feedback on its content and any actions you think should be added or prioritized. 
    The document focusses on five areas which are essential to improving the performance of the New Zealand economy.

    Developing talent by lifting education and skills:  Too many of our kids have been leaving school without the basics they need to succeed in an increasingly demanding world. This is a moral failure.  It’s also a fiscal and economic timebomb. Our Government is improving our education system to deliver a better deal for Kiwi kids.
    Competitive business settings: Excessive and badly-designed regulations have slowed New Zealand down, added costs and prevented too many good ideas from become reality. Several of our major sectors lack competition and consumers are paying the price. Our Government is removing red tape, reducing compliance costs and promoting competition to deliver a better deal for Kiwi consumers.
    Promoting global trade and investment: New Zealand is a small country, geographically distant from many of the world’s large economies. We need to keep pursuing trade relationships and international connections not only to get good prices for our exports, but also to keep up with emerging technologies and to access the world’s talent and capital. Our Government is growing our trade relationships and rolling out the welcome mat for international investment so we can deliver better paying jobs for Kiwis.
    Innovation, technology and science:  New Zealand’s science system is not geared up for the future economy. Our businesses have often been slow to invest in the technology needed to make them more productive. We’re modernizing our science and innovation system so we can deliver a better deal for Kiwi businesses who want to use science and tech to grow.
    Infrastructure for growth:  New Zealand’s Resource Management system has been weaponised against development, adding cost, slowing things down and stopping too many projects. Despite abundant land, housing remains unaffordable for too many. Major infrastructure projects are too slow, too expensive and too few. Our Government is removing roadblocks to delivery of housing and infrastructure and fast-tracking major developments so we can deliver better living standards for New Zealanders.

    Some of you will be familiar with the work we already have underway in each of these areas. Today I want to share some thoughts about a few areas where I think more reform is needed.
    Number One. Driving greater competition in sectors that are vital to our national interests, including banking, grocery and electricity.  
    The economic impetus for this is clear. Strong competition protects consumer interests, it puts downward pressure on costs, it incentivises innovation and investment, it supports efficient allocation of resources and it drives productivity.
    When I look around the business landscape today I see too many sectors where market power has been entrenched to the detriment of everyday people.
    New Zealand has seen significant mergers and consolidation across major industries. Big fish have been swallowing the little fish and regulatory barriers have stopped new fish from entering the pond. 
    While many super-sized businesses have flourished, in too many cases the Kiwis they sell to have experienced higher prices, fewer choices and a worse deal all round.
    In my view, law-makers and regulators have been far too complacent about diminishing levels of competition in vital areas. Large-scale mergers have been repeatedly allowed in major industries, with so-called efficiency prioritised over the interests of consumers.
    Well-intended regulations have become a moat, stopping challengers from disrupting the status quo. 
    The result?  A raw deal for Kiwi consumers. 
    The dominance of big fish has also made it difficult for many small businesses to grow into larger businesses. 
    We see it in the banking industry which the Commerce Commission has described as a highly profitable, two-tier oligopoly. The Government is taking action to address this.
    And we see it in the supermarket sector in which three large entities, two of whom don’t compete in the same island, effectively control 82 per cent of the market. 
    The result, as the Commerce Commission reported in 2022, is that competition between grocery retailers is muted, profits are high, product ranges are limited and shoppers pay higher prices than people in many other countries. 
    In this environment it is almost impossible for a new entrant to establish a foothold in the New Zealand market.
    Even if they are able to battle their way through the thicket of resource management and overseas investment regulation, they are confronted in many cases by an absence of suitable land for new supermarket developments. It has been land-banked by the established players.
    Some of our best food producers also tell me they are struggling because of the duopolistic practices of the major players. 
    If Kiwi food producers can’t afford to keep their products on New Zealand supermarket shelves, how are they ever going to grow to the point where they can export overseas?
    The supermarket lobby will find 1000 different ways to say this is not the case, but it is. 
    The OECD has this to say about the New Zealand supermarket sector:
    “Two major players dominate the market through their portfolio of different brands.  As a result, they can extract higher prices from consumers (oligopoly power) but also exert ‘oligopsony power’ on their suppliers, passing on costs and uncertainty to them, with the threat of removing products from shelves if suppliers disagree”
    Studies have shown that New Zealand supermarkets were the most expensive for kitchen staples compared with the UK, Ireland and Australia.
    If you doubt the findings of the OECD, research papers, or the Commerce Commission, just ask the everyday Mums and Dads at the checkout:
    Kiwi shoppers feel ripped-off.  
    I think of PK, the Kiwi man who went viral on Tik Tok, sharing how he cried when he discovered how much cheaper the food was when he moved to Australia. I think of the parents in the supermarket aisle, putting back the chocolate biscuits as the weekly shop blows their budget – again.  And I think of all those people who endure gut-wrenching anxiety as they watch their items being scanned and the numbers tallying up on the till.
    The weekly supermarket shop makes up a significant proportion of most people’s weekly budget and contributes massively to their cost of living.
    They deserve to know they are getting a fair deal.
    Right now, I don’t think they are.  I’m ready to pull out all the stops to get them a fairer deal.
    The supermarkets will fight back I’m sure. It’s a fight worth having.
    So what can the Government do?
    Let me reassure you, we are not going to open our own grocery chain. There will be no KiwiShop. 
    Instead I’d like to see another competitor enter the supermarket scene to  disrupt the major players, drive down prices and increase options for Kiwi shoppers.
    Over the past 12 months, international supermarket chains and local investors have expressed interest in entering the New Zealand grocery market. 
    I want to help them succeed.
    We owe it to Kiwi shoppers to help remove the barriers that could get in the way of a new entrant.
    That could include removing unnecessary regulatory hurdles in the Overseas Investment Act, Resource Management Act and the entire regulatory maze; helping them to access suitable land and properties for development; helping them to attract capital; cracking down on predatory pricing and ensuring they have fair access to products. 
    If a new grocery chain opened up here it would deliver massive gains for Kiwi shoppers.  So I’m up for actions needed to help make it happen.
    At the same time, the Government must continue our efforts to hold the existing supermarket chains accountable to their customers and suppliers. 
    That means enhancing consumer protections and correcting power imbalances between suppliers and supermarkets. It means strengthening the Grocery Supply Code, enforcing action against non-compliance and illegal conduct, introducing a Wholesale Code to enhance access for smaller retailers, introducing disclosure standards for consumer complaints and responding to further recommendations the Commerce Commission makes.
    Commerce Minister Andrew Bayly has already been pushing hard in this space. This year we’re dialling up the pressure.
    The major supermarket chains should listen up: our Government is on the side of Kiwi shoppers and we will act to defend their interests.
    Number two:  The Government’s approach to procurement.
    The Government is a huge player in the New Zealand economy. Every year it procures billions of dollars worth of goods and services.
    Those doing the procuring understandably play close attention to prices.  That is as it should be. We want value for money. 
    But getting value is not just about cost. Getting value is also about assessing the contribution particular contracts can make to New Zealand as a whole.
    The Government wants the Government agencies doing the procuring to assess the value as well as the cost of contracts. 
    Small and medium-sized businesses say that too often they can’t effectively bid for Government contracts because of the complexity of official procurement processes. 
    I am reviewing the Government procurement rules that cause this and will soon be recommending changes to Cabinet. I want to ensure value to New Zealand is properly considered when government agencies are picking suppliers, ensuring a more level playing field, improving the ability of smaller businesses to bid and giving more small and medium sized Kiwi businesses the opportunity to grow and become global players.
    Third, tax settings.
    New Zealand must ensure our tax settings are competitive with other countries who seek to lure our talent, ideas and jobs.
    We need to ensure the New Zealand tax system does not discourage businesspeople from investing in their businesses and does not deter foreign investment. 
    I am considering a range of proposals to make our tax settings more competitive over time.
    Fourth, affordable energy.
    Alongside the supermarket bill, electricity prices are a major pain point for Kiwi households.  Spiking prices and uncertain supply are also a major barrier to industry and the jobs it supports.
    As we look out to the world, it’s clear that those choosing to invest in manufacturing, data centers and technological parks will increasingly ask themselves: does the country that we want to invest in have secure, affordable and renewable energy? 
    New Zealand is pretty well-positioned for that. We already have abundant levels of renewable energy. 
    The question is, are we well positioned to bring on new generation at the pace needed to keep both security of supply and affordability? 
    That’s a question the Government is very much engaged in. 
    The Energy Competition Task Force has published proposals to give consumers more control over energy costs. In addition, independent reviewers will report to Ministers in the middle of the year on the performance of the energy market.  
    My view is that the world’s surging demand for renewable energy has changed the game. It’s time to think much more boldly about the actions the Government may need to take to incentivise new generation, security of supply and affordable electricity.
    Fifth, savings.
    Finally, I want to see KiwiSaver working as well as possible for New Zealanders. Commerce Minister Andrew Bayly already has work underway to enable Kiwisaver providers to make greater investments in private assets, to generate good returns for savers and ensure more Kiwi savings can be deployed for investment here at home.  
    I want to see KiwiSaver balances grow, both to make Kiwis better off in retirement and to grow our collective national savings. I am taking advice on options for achieving that with a view to taking recommendations to Cabinet.
    Let me finish by providing you with some perspective. 
    Our domestic context is challenging. Internationally we are arguably operating in a more complex, faster changing world than at any time in history. 
    But, when I look around the world, there is nowhere I would rather build a business or raise a family than here in New Zealand.
    But the world doesn’t owe us a living. We have to compete hard to deliver for our national interests and the interests of New Zealanders. 
    Our Government’s plan to grow the economy is about making the most of New Zealand’s many advantages, removing barriers that are holding Kiwis back and competing for our share of the world’s wealth.
    This is not an abstract mission.  It goes to the heart of what matters to New Zealanders. 
    To create better paying jobs and make Kiwis more financially secure, we must grow our economy.
    To deliver better health services and schools, we must grow our economy.
    To make New Zealand more resilient to global challenges, we must grow our economy.
    This Government backs New Zealanders to succeed. I know you do too. I wish you a successful conference and look forward to hearing your ideas.  Let’s go for growth.

    MIL OSI New Zealand News –

    February 13, 2025
  • MIL-OSI NGOs: London: Activists stage ‘Ecocide Babe’ stunt outside courts as Shell trial begins

    Source: Amnesty International –

    Photo op: Activist to hold a ‘baby’ that has simulated crude oil congealed around its mouth highlighting the public health impact of environmental devastation caused by Shell in Nigeria

    Location & date: Royal Courts of Justice, Thursday 13 February at 9am

    Ogale and Bille communities vs Shell trial starts that day

    On Thursday 13 February, Amnesty International UK, the Movement for the Survival of the Ogoni People (MOSOP), AFRICA: Seen & Heard and Justice 4 Nigeria are marking the start of the Ogale and Bille communities vs Shell trial with the stunt ‘Ecocide Babe’ by British-Nigerian artist-activist The Crude Madonna outside the Royal Courts of Justice.

    In the performance, The Crude Madonna – representing Niger Delta womanhood and resistance – will wear traditional Nigerian dress and gold-painted Shell-shaped medallions saying ‘hell’ and ‘oil’ coated with ‘crude oil’ and hold the Ecocide Babe Alera (which means ‘it is enough’ in the local Khana language) with crude oil congealed around the baby’s mouth.

    Created by artists The Crude Madonna and THE DnA FACTORY MRSS, the Ecocide Babe  symbolises the devastating effect of oil pollution on fertility, pregnancy and infant health in the region as well as its overall impact on communities and the environment caused by Shell’s 60 years of oil spills and leaks due to poorly maintained pipelines, wells and inadequate clean-up attempts that have ravaged the health and livelihoods of many of the 30 million people living in the Niger Delta – most of whom live in poverty.

    This is the first stage of the trial that will take place in London throughout 2025. More than 13,500 Ogale and Bille residents in the Niger Delta have filed claims against Shell over the past decade demanding the company clean up oil spills that they say have wrecked their livelihoods and caused widespread devastation to the local environment. They can’t fish anymore because their water sources, including their wells for drinking water, are poisoned and the land is contaminated which has killed plant life, meaning communities can no longer farm.    

    Shell plc is domiciled in London and should be legally responsible for the environmental failures of its subsidiary company, the Shell Petroleum Development Company of Nigeria. 

    Details of event

    Who: Amnesty International UK, Movement for the Survival of the Ogoni People, AFRICA: Seen & Heard and Justice 4 Nigeria

    ​What: Spokespeople available for comment, and photo opportunity outside court. Supporters will hold a banner and placards saying: ‘Shell: Own up, Clean up, Pay up’.

    ​Where: Royal Courts of Justice, the Strand, London, WC2A 2LL

    ​When: Thursday 13 February. Photo opportunity 9:00-10:30am; court proceedings start at 10:30am.

    MIL OSI NGO –

    February 13, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: International Conference organised by Central Council for Research in Unani Medicine concludes today

    Source: Government of India (2)

    International Conference organised by Central Council for Research in Unani Medicine concludes today

    National and International experts and luminaries from the field of health sciences shared their knowledge and expertise

    Posted On: 12 FEB 2025 8:10PM by PIB Delhi

    The International Conference on “Innovations in Unani Medicine for Integrative Health Solutions – A way forward” organized by the Central Council for Research in Unani Medicine (CCRUM), Ministry of Ayush, Government of India in hybrid mode as part of Unani Day 2025 Celebration successfully concluded at Vigyan Bhawan, New Delhi today.

    The conference was inaugurated yesterday by Smt. Droupadi Murmu, President of India in the presence of Dr. Jitendra Singh, Minister of State (Independent Charge), Ministry of Science and Technology, Ministry of Earth Sciences, Minister of State, Prime Minister’s Office, Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions, Department of Atomic Energy & Department of Space, Government of India, Shri PratapraoJadhav, Minister of State (Independent Charge), Ministry of Ayush & Minister of State for Health Family welfare.

    The conference had a panel discussion and nine scientific sessions on the sub-themes, viz. “Harnessing Artificial Intelligence and Machine learning for Ayush/ Traditional Medicine: Prospects and Challenges”, “Unani Medicine for Globalized Health-Unlocking New Opportunities.”, “Moving towards Sustainable Development Goal -3: Good Health and Well Being. ”, “Integrating Traditional Medicine into Healthcare Systems”, “Unani Perspectives on Mental Health and Well-Being”, “Development of Unani Ahar (Diet): through Scientific Approach”, “Evidence based recent research trends in Unani Medicine”, “Advancements in Regimental therapies (Ilaj biltadbir)” and “Translational Research in Unani/traditional systems of medicine”.

    A number of national and international experts and luminaries from the field of health sciences shared their knowledge, experiences and expertise in the conference. Stakeholders from industry, academia and research organizations engaged in development of Unani Medicine and related health sciences attended the conference in large numbers physically as well as in online mode.

    The conference also witnessed the transfer of patented technology, developed by CCRUM. The technology was transferred by NRDC on behalf of CCRUM to industry. The technology for Unani toothpaste for dental care was transferred to Dehlvi Naturals while the technology for Unani Regimen for Vitiligo was transferred to Hamdard Laboratories. The valedictory session witnessed release of three books published by the CCRUM, together with three videos and Presentation of Appreciation Certificates to exhibitors.

    Valedictory session was graced by Ms. Monalisa Dash, Joint secretary, Ayush. In her address she extended her warm greetings on the occasion and emphasized that Unani medicine, with its rich heritage and holistic approach, has immense potential to address contemporary health challenges. Encouraging stakeholders to actively engage, she urged them to leverage this platform for knowledge exchange, interdisciplinary partnerships, and efforts to enhance the scientific validation and accessibility of Unani medicine. She added that “During the past two days we have seen exchange of ideas and experience. Opening vistas of opportunities to new students and researchers. The Ministry of Ayush is offering significant support to Unani and working on better acceptance. Our culture ethos of Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam which depicts the world is one family and hence all should reap the benefits of Unani medicine.   The standard and quality control are vital areas and should be focused in every system for their global acceptance. NABL and NABH accreditation of CCRUM institutes  reflects the commitment of CCRUM in this area”. She encouraged the students to take the best of the deliberations by eminent scholars.

    Dr. N. Zaheer Ahmad, Director General, CCRUM, Ministry of Ayush, Government of India, expressed his gratitude to the dignitaries, academicians, researchers, industry leaders and CCRUM officials for their valuable contributions to the conference. He stated that the presence of Hon’ble President of India was totally overwhelming for all of us.He summed up the inaugural and the proceedings of the conference and expressed happiness over the launch of books, videos, barley based Unani Ahaar, and proudly shared that the transfer of technology was done for the first time in the history of CCRUM. He further stressed CCRUM’s pivotal role in pioneering advanced research, establishing state-of-the-art laboratories, and promoting evidence-based practices to elevate the global recognition of Unani medicine. By fostering innovation, upholding quality standards, and strengthening collaborations, Unani medicine can continue to thrive as a vital component of integrative healthcare, contributing to a healthier and more sustainable future.

    Professor Mohammad Afshar Alam, Vice Chancellor, Jamia Hamdard, stated that Unani medicine has been the cornerstone for healthcare systems. It is relatively safe and has the ability to address contemporary health issues. Recognizing the contributions of Hakim Ajmal Khan, he acknowledged the contribution of Hakim Abdul Hameed who was a pioneer in advancing Unani medicine. He stated that no single system can address all health issues and so we need better collaboration and integration. Integrating health solution is not only for treating disease but also for promotion and improvement of lifestyle. He reaffirmed that Jamia Hamdard is committed to advancing the rich legacy of traditional systems of medicine. He congratulate the Director General and his team and the dignitaries in making this conference a success

     

    ****

    MV/AKS

    (Release ID: 2102484) Visitor Counter : 81

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News –

    February 13, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: Dr. Jitendra Singh Calls for Competency Framework to Strengthen India’s Scientific Workforce

    Source: Government of India

    Dr. Jitendra Singh Calls for Competency Framework to Strengthen India’s Scientific Workforce

    The Minister Reviews ‘Vigyan Shakti’ Initiative to Drive Science-Led Development and Collaboration

    Growing Participation in Research Grants: Dr. Jitendra Singh Assesses Common Fellowship Portal

    Dr. Jitendra Singh Proposes Industrial Calendar to Boost Research-Industry Linkages and Accelerate Innovation

    Expanding Opportunities: Minister Advocates Tribal Student Internships in Scientific Institutes

    Posted On: 12 FEB 2025 6:36PM by PIB Delhi

    In a high-level meeting with Secretaries of Scientific Ministries, Departments, and Organizations and other higher officials,  Union Minister of State (Independent Charge) for Science and Technology; Earth Sciences and Minister of State for PMO, Department of Atomic Energy, Department of Space, Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions, Dr. Jitendra Singh underscored the need for a structured competency framework for individuals working in scientific institutions. The Minister directed that the framework, developed in coordination with the Capacity Building Commission, should incorporate both functional and domain-specific competencies. Emphasizing the importance of outreach, he insisted that “how much is my outreach to the public stakeholders” be included as a key performance indicator (KPI), a facet often overlooked by science ministries.

    Taking stock of the ambitious “Vigyan Shakti” initiative, the Minister reviewed its progress and reiterated its role as a unified repository aimed at catalysing scientific efforts into developmental outcomes. Built on pillars such as inter-agency collaboration, industry-academia interactions and leadership and governance, the initiative seeks to maximize returns on investment in science. As part of this, he assessed the India Science, Technology, and Innovation (ISTI) Portal, which is envisioned to consolidate the database of India’s science and technology ecosystem and enhance accessibility to critical research resources.

    Dr. Jitendra Singh also reviewed the status of the Common Fellowship Portal, designed as a one-stop platform for research grants  India. According to the latest data, the portal has garnered over 5,000 registered users, with more than 1,500 having completed their profiles and being eligible to apply for fellowships. The Minister expressed satisfaction at the growing participation and encouraged further awareness efforts to make research grants more accessible to young scientists.

    In a push to bridge the gap between research and industry, Dr. Jitendra Singh proposed that all scientific labs under various ministries develop a dedicated calendar for industrial meets. He highlighted that a structured engagement with the private sector would not only accelerate the commercialization of scientific discoveries but also enhance their impact on public welfare. Such an Initiative, he stated, would ensure that technological breakthroughs reach the masses faster and more efficiently.

    In a move to promote inclusivity in scientific research, Dr. Jitendra Singh urged all departments to explore opportunities for attaching tribal students to various scientific institutes for internships and exposure. He stressed that such initiatives would provide underprivileged students with valuable insights into research and innovation, fostering a more diverse and inclusive scientific community.

    The meeting was attended by Dr. A.K. Sood, Principal Scientific Advisor to the Government of India, along with Prof. Abhay Karandikar, Secretary, DST; Dr. Rajesh Gokhale, Secretary, Biotechnology; Shri Ravi Chandran, Secretary, Earth Sciences; Dr. N. Kalaiselvi, DG, CSIR; Dr. V. Narayanan, Chairman, ISRO and Secretary, Department of Space and other senior officials.

    The meeting marked a significant step towards institutionalizing structured scientific engagement, fostering innovation, and ensuring that the benefits of research extend beyond laboratories to public stakeholders.

     

    *********

    NKR/PSM

    (Release ID: 2102421) Visitor Counter : 62

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News –

    February 13, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: Clearcover Launches Reciprocal Insurance Exchange to Expand Non-Standard Auto Business

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    CHICAGO, Feb. 12, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Clearcover, a next-generation insurance company, announces the launch of Clearcover Inter-Insurance Exchange (CIX), a reciprocal exchange designed to extend the company’s reach into the non-standard auto market.

    CIX represents a groundbreaking step in Clearcover’s strategy to enhance profitability, drive growth, and redefine the auto insurance experience. Initially launching in Illinois, the exchange is set to scale its operations to additional markets in the near future.

    “Launching CIX marks a turning point as we continue to redefine auto insurance,” said Clearcover CEO and Co-founder Kyle Nakatsuji. “By broadening our market focus and harnessing our tech-driven platform, we’re empowering more customers and agents while delivering unmatched efficiency and competitive pricing.”

    The company recently began expanding its appetite to provide insurance solutions to a broader range of customers in Texas through Clearcover General Agency (CGA). Together, these initiatives highlight Clearcover’s drive to create flexible, customer-centric offerings that align with evolving market needs.

    Key Benefits Include:

    1. Expanded Reach

    • Agents can serve a broader range of customers, including those with inconsistent insurance histories, foreign licenses, or fewer than three years of driving experience.

    2. Maximized Earnings

    • Competitive commission structures enable agents to grow their sales pipelines by connecting more drivers to affordable and personalized insurance solutions.

    3. Advanced Technology

    • AI-powered tools are designed to empower customers with seamless self-service capabilities and streamline agent workflows.

    Delivering Value Through Subscriber Participation

    CIX is structured as a reciprocal exchange, providing enhanced value to its policyholders, known as ‘subscribers.’ As a reciprocal exchange, subscribers participate in forming and owning part of CIX, which in turn may keep premiums lower as member contributions accrue and offset operating expenses.

    A Strategic Path to Sustainable Growth

    With the launch of CIX and the Texas-based MGA, Clearcover unlocks new revenue streams while strengthening its commitment to innovation in a competitive and evolving industry.

    For more information about Clearcover, visit Clearcover.com.

    About Clearcover
    Clearcover is a next-generation insurance company that provides customers with market-leading technology solutions needed to confidently make smart decisions at every step. Clearcover challenges the status quo with hassle-free products and services that redefine what it means to put the customer first, delivering affordable car insurance with one of the industry’s fastest claims experiences. Founded in 2016 by Kyle Nakatsuji and Derek Brigham, Clearcover includes: Clearcover Insurance Company, Clearcover Insurance Agency and Clearcover General Agency. In 2025, Clearcover began operating a reciprocal exchange, Clearcover Inter-Insurance Exchange (“CIX”). Ranked on the Inc. 5000 Fastest Growing Privately Held Companies list and the Deloitte Technology Fast 500™ list, Clearcover has raised more than $560 million in funding to date. The company was featured on Insurance Business America’s 2024 Top Insurance Employers list, CNBC’s 2024 World’s Top Insurtech Companies and Forbes’ 2025 America’s Best Insurance Companies. For more information, visit Clearcover.com.

    The MIL Network –

    February 13, 2025
←Previous Page
1 … 265 266 267 268 269 … 358
Next Page→
NewzIntel.com

NewzIntel.com

MIL Open Source Intelligence

  • Blog
  • About
  • FAQs
  • Authors
  • Events
  • Shop
  • Patterns
  • Themes

Twenty Twenty-Five

Designed with WordPress