Source: European Parliament
AMENDMENTS 016-025
REPORT
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanism
(COM(2025)0087 – C10-0035/2025 – 2025/0039(COD))
Committee on the Environment, Climate and Food Safety
Rapporteur: Antonio Decaro
Source : © European Union, 2025 – EP
Source: European Parliament
1. The threat posed by unexploded ordnance (UXO) and chemical munitions dumped in EU waters is addressed in the revised EU Maritime Security Strategy[1], which includes actions on mapping, risk assessment and cross-border cooperation. At the 2023 ‘Our Baltic’ Conference, Member States committed to mitigating UXO threats in the Baltic Sea. The Commission encourages Member States to collaborate with regional organisations, research institutes, and private entities to address this issue effectively.
2. Currently, the EU supports three major projects: Muni-risk[2], Mine-sweeper[3] and Munimap[4] — focused on risk analysis, mapping, and technology development for UXO clearance[5]. In June 2024, the Commission launched a EUR 5.6 million pilot project[6] to develop new UXO removal technologies and enhance coordination among authorities, researchers and industry in the Baltic Sea. The lessons learnt from these projects will be transferable to all sea basins around Europe facing similar threats. In total, the EU has invested over EUR 24 million in UXO-related actions.
3. Authorising wind farm projects is the competence of Member States and must be in full compliance with applicable EU law, including the Birds and Habitats Directives[7] and the directive on the Resilience of Critical Entities[8]. The Commission provided guidance to Member States on how to implement wind energy projects in accordance with EU nature legislation[9]. The impact on Natura 2000 sites will have to be duly assessed by Member States.
Source: US Republican Governors Association
The following text contains opinion that is not, or not necessarily, that of MIL-OSI –
WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, Republican governors sent a joint letter to Senate Majority Leader John Thune thanking him for his support of the Senate’s work to roll back burdensome regulations through the Congressional Review Act (CRA) and to encourage the use of the CRA to stop the radical unelected bureaucrats in California from dictating rules that negatively affect the quality of life, jobs, and commerce in states across the nation.
In part, the governors wrote:
“Toward the end of the Biden administration, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued a rule approving California’s ban on gas-powered cars by 2035. This approval impacts all our states as the EPA has historically acknowledged the nationwide effect of California’s regulations.
“However, our nation’s capital is in Washington, D.C., not Sacramento, California. Our states have enough regulatory pressure coming from Washington. We do not need California to regulate us as well.
“Thankfully, the House of Representatives voted in early May to withdraw California’s waiver and stop the ban on gasoline-only vehicles. In a bipartisan vote, with 35 Democrats joining 211 Republicans, the House used the Congressional Review Act (CRA) to block California’s plan.”
Read the full letter here.
Signatories to the letter include: Governor Kay Ivey (AL), Governor Sarah Sanders (AR), Governor Brian Kemp (GA), Governor Brad Little (ID), Governor Mike Braun (IN), Governor Kim Reynolds (IA), Governor Jeff Landry (LA), Governor Mike Kehoe (MO), Governor Greg Gianforte (MT), Governor Jim Pillen (NE), Governor Joe Lombardo (NV), Governor Kelly Armstrong (ND), Governor Henry McMaster (SC), Governor Bill Lee (TN), Governor Greg Abbott (TX), Governor Spencer Cox (UT), Governor Glenn Youngkin (VA), Governor Patrick Morrisey (WV), Governor Mark Gordon (WY), and Governor Jenniffer González-Colón (PR).
###
Source: United States House of Representatives – Congresswoman Chellie Pingree (1st District of Maine)
Today, during the House Appropriations Interior and Environment Subcommittee hearing for the Fiscal Year 2026 budget request with Secretary Burgum, Ranking Member Chellie Pingree (D-Maine) laid out how the Trump Administration is dismantling the Department of the Interior—abandoning its core mission to protect our environment, preserve our public lands, and help steward our natural resources in order to pay for tax cuts for billionaires.
[embedded content]
Click here to watch Pingree’s opening remarks; Watch the full hearing here.
Pingree’s remarks as prepared for delivery:
Secretary Burgum, we appreciate your being here today. This is my first chance to meet you, and I want to thank you for bringing your many skills as a former governor and businessman to this very important position.
The Department of the Interior is tasked with protecting and managing our natural resources and cultural heritage, providing scientific information about those resources, and honoring our treaty and trust responsibilities.
I will warn you, I am deeply, deeply concerned with the state of the Department of the Interior. In just four months, the Department has been destabilized, and there has been a stunning decline in its ability to meet this mission. Given your extensive executive experience, I am stunned and disappointed that you would allow this to happen.
In partnership with Elon Musk’s rogue “agency” DOGE, you illegally canceled grants for conservation, for ecosystem restoration, and other important work. Over 1,700 probationary employees have been recklessly fired and 7,600 (or 11%) of the Interior workforce have been pushed to resign. These are not just numbers—those people are experts and dedicated public servants with decades of programmatic and institutional knowledge that is critically needed to ensure the Department fulfills its mission as a guardian of our public lands.
To make matters worse, you instituted a hiring freeze and are considering even further reductions-in-force. I don’t see this ending well for this precious agency that this committee is dedicated to overseeing. And that this committee has devoted hundreds of hours to nurturing.
Further, due to the policies you have instituted, employees are hamstrung from accomplishing everyday tasks by absurdly limiting credit card expenditures to $1. This is no way to efficiently run an organization. In fact, these actions seem to be designed to obstruct employees from doing their job.
Even the National Park Service is under attack: Ahead of peak season, you have gutted staff—leaving national parks like Acadia, in my home state of Maine, understaffed and without the resources needed to keep summer visitors safe, and our parks pristine and protected.
Your Fiscal Year 2026 budget is equally devastating, with a proposed cut to the Department of 30%.
The budget eviscerates the U.S. Geological Survey with a proposed $564 million cut, targeting scientific research on natural hazards, ecosystems, water, and Earth mapping. These programs help us monitor and provide real-time earthquake and hazard information, they strengthen our assessment of groundwater and surface water systems, and they help ensure our national safety by informing the management of our mineral and energy resources.
Without these programs, our communities will be left vulnerable to natural disasters and deprived of the scientific data that guides responsible land management.
The budget shamefully abandons our trust and treaty obligations to Native Americans, slashing the Bureau of Indian Affairs public safety and justice programs by 19% when we are already only meeting a fraction of the need. You’ve also chosen to eliminate funding for desperately needed school construction, leaving a $1 billion repair backlog untouched.
Secretary Burgum, the document we are here to discuss today is more than just a budget. It is a blueprint for dismantling the very mission of the Department of the Interior, making it impossible to protect our natural resources and iconic national parks or uphold our commitments to Tribal communities now and for future generations.
As Ranking Member of this subcommittee, I wholeheartedly oppose these harmful cuts, and I will not stand by while you attempt to hollow out this agency.
Thank you again for being here this morning. I hope you are prepared to give a rationale for your decisions or work with us to reverse them.
I yield back.
###
Source: US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Search by city or zip code. Press enter or select the go button to submit request
Local forecast by”City, St” or “ZIP”
SPC on Facebook
@NWSSPC
NCEP Quarterly Newsletter
Home (Classic)SPC Products All SPC Forecasts Current Watches Meso. Discussions Conv. Outlooks Tstm. Outlooks Fire Wx Outlooks RSS Feeds E-Mail AlertsWeather Information Storm Reports Storm Reports Dev. NWS Hazards Map National RADAR Product Archive NOAA Weather RadioResearch Non-op. Products Forecast Tools Svr. Tstm. Events SPC Publications SPC-NSSL HWTEducation & Outreach About the SPC SPC FAQ About Tornadoes About Derechos Video Lecture Series WCM Page Enh. Fujita Page Our History Public ToursMisc. StaffContact Us SPC Feedback
Watch 302 Status Reports
Watch 302 Status Message has not been issued yet.
Top/Watch Issuance Text for Watch 302/All Current Watches/Forecast Products/Home
Weather Topics:Watches, Mesoscale Discussions, Outlooks, Fire Weather, All Products, Contact Us
NOAA / National Weather ServiceNational Centers for Environmental PredictionStorm Prediction Center120 David L. Boren Blvd.Norman, OK 73072 U.S.A.spc.feedback@noaa.govPage last modified: May 20, 2025
DisclaimerInformation QualityHelpGlossary
Privacy PolicyFreedom of Information Act (FOIA)About UsCareer Opportunities
Sand, gravel and crushed stone are the backbone of Alberta’s construction economy – essential for building the roads we drive on, the homes we live in and the infrastructure that supports our communities. These critical aggregates, often sourced from private land, play a foundational role across multiple industries. While these materials are heavily regulated to protect Alberta’s environment, landowners and operators have consistently voiced frustration that excessive red tape is creating unnecessary barriers to development and slowing down the delivery of sand and gravel to market.
To dig into these concerns and build a more efficient path forward, Alberta’s government is launching the Sand and Gravel Task Force. This dedicated group will work to streamline regulations related to sand and gravel pits located on private lands, ensuring faster project timelines while continuing to uphold Alberta’s high environmental standards.
Led by Glenn van Dijken, MLA for Barrhead-Morinville-Westlock, and Brandon Lunty, MLA for Leduc-Beaumont, the task force will include representatives from industry and municipalities who understand the importance of timely access to sand and gravel resources. Over the next six months, the Sand and Gravel Task Force will deliver actionable recommendations focused on reducing bureaucratic delays, supporting landowners and strengthening Alberta’s aggregate supply chain.
By clearing away unnecessary red tape, Alberta is preparing the ground for a more responsive regulatory system – one that delivers more sand and gravel, faster and smarter.
“With the launch of the Sand and Gravel Task Force, we’re paving the way for a faster, smoother process. It’s time to stop graveling under bureaucracy and start building Alberta’s future. MLA van Dijken and MLA Lunty will leave no stone unturned as they dig into this important work.”
“Sand and gravel are foundational for building and maintaining a strong economy. From road infrastructure to industrial uses or residential housing, these resources are essential. Our government is determined to ensure the regulatory process around sand and gravel pits recognizes the need for efficiency and clarity.”
“This new task force will reduce red tape and answer the call to build more when Albertans need it most. With more than 1,000 sand and gravel pit registrations on private land, streamlining the applications and approvals will bring significant development benefits.”
“Rural municipalities are on the front lines of balancing the economic value of aggregate extraction with the need to protect farmland, infrastructure and the environment. I’m honoured to represent the Rural Municipalities of Alberta on this Task Force and committed to advancing a more transparent, consistent and practical regulatory process. This is an important step toward ensuring that the voices of rural communities are not only heard but meaningfully integrated into decision-making.”
“I’m pleased to represent the interests of our association’s 264 member communities on this task force. I look forward to finding ways to streamline and accelerate the regulatory process for sand and gravel extraction, while upholding Alberta’s commitment to environmental excellence.”
US Senate News:
Source: United States Senator for Illinois Dick Durbin
May 19, 2025
WASHINGTON – U.S. Senate Democratic Whip Dick Durbin (D-IL), Ranking Member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, today released the following statement after meeting with Stanley Woodward, President Trump’s nominee to be the Associate Attorney General of the U.S. Department of Justice:
“The Department of Justice is reeling from turmoil, as extremist loyalists dismantle longstanding programs and protections to appease the President. DOJ is causing a mass exodus of key staff, canceling hundreds of millions of dollars in grants, and reassigning what little staff is left to bolster the President’s illegal mass deportation scheme—and none of it makes our country safer.
“The Associate Attorney General oversees many crucial offices and programs under threat. I shared as much with Mr. Woodward, and I look forward to hearing more from him under oath.”
The Associate Attorney General oversees the Civil Division, Civil Rights Division, Antitrust Division, Tax Division, Environment and Natural Resources Division, Office of Justice Programs, Office on Violence Against Women, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services, Office for Access to Justice, Office of Information Policy, Community Relations Service, United States Trustees Program, and Foreign Claims Settlement Commission.
-30-
Source: United States House of Representatives – Representative Paul Tonko (Capital Region New York)
WASHINGTON, DC — Congressman Paul D. Tonko, Ranking Member of the Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Environment, today questioned Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Lee Zeldin during an Environment Subcommittee hearing on the EPA’s Fiscal Year 2026 budget.
Listen to Rep. Tonko’s opening remarks HERE and see below as prepared for delivery.
President Trump’s Fiscal Year 2026 budget request for EPA has been called “problematic,” “an unserious proposal,” and “maybe a bridge too far to be achievable.”
These were the reactions of Republican Appropriators last week, and I expect you will hear even less charitable reviews from Democrats on this Subcommittee today.
This proposal includes a 55% reduction from FY25 levels, resulting in agency funding levels not seen since the mid-1980s.
If enacted, this would fundamentally dismantle the EPA as we know it and cripple the agency’s ability to carry out its core mission of protecting the air we breathe and the water we drink.
The request includes devastating cuts that will undermine states’ efforts to protect public health and carry out their obligations, including a $2.46 billion reduction to the State Revolving Funds for water infrastructure and a $1 billion reduction for categorical grants, which are critical to supporting staffing of state environmental agencies.
I believe this is part of a disturbing trend we are seeing to force more costs onto state governments, as is being done with the proposed cuts to Medicaid in the majority’s reconciliation bill.
Similar to these funding cuts, earlier this year the Administration expressed a desire to reduce EPA staffing levels by 65%, which would return the agency to 1971 personnel levels — the agency’s second year in existence.
It is not credible to suggest that the agency can fulfill its statutory requirements — including all the major environmental laws and amendments to those laws that have been enacted since the 1970s — with these proposed staffing levels.
Cuts of this magnitude would not only hollow out the agency’s expertise and capacity, but they are insensitive to the public servants who have dedicated their lives to supporting the agency’s mission.
And it is worth reminding everyone of what that mission is: To protect human health and the environment.
In just a few short months, I believe the agency, under Administrator Zeldin’s leadership, has lost sight of this mission.
Mr. Zeldin launched the “Powering the Great American Comeback” initiative focused on American energy, auto manufacturing, and artificial intelligence dominance.
And broadly speaking, I am not necessarily opposed to aspects of that agenda, but I also do not believe it is the appropriate role for our nation’s environmental regulator to be leading this effort.
Because EPA’s contributions to those goals more or less translate to how can we reduce environmental protections and enforcements of those protections for the benefit of energy producers, the auto industry, and Big Tech, even if ordinary Americans will pay the price by breathing harmful air pollution, drinking contaminated water, and being exposed to dangerous chemicals.
We have already seen a slew of agency actions that will result in greater pollution and reduce our scientific capacity to understand how that pollution will impact Americans’ health and well-being.
This includes reconsidering rules that protect Americans from pollution from power plants, vehicles, and industrial facilities, and weakening standards to keep PFAS out of our drinking water.
Each of these public health protections up for reconsideration went through robust rulemaking processes and economic analyses, which found that every one of these rules delivers greater benefits to the American people, in public health and economic benefits, than they cost.
I am also concerned by EPA’s efforts to terminate previously awarded grants without producing any evidence of fraud, waste, or abuse.
For each of those awards, the previous administration carried out competitive selection processes based upon requirements enacted by Congress.
Whether or not Administrator Zeldin personally believes Congress was wasting taxpayer dollars when it directed EPA to carry out those funding opportunities is irrelevant.
No Administrator should be the sole arbitrator of what is a good use of Congressionally-directed taxpayer dollars, and yet we have seen billions of dollars impounded without justification.
Finally, I am very concerned by reports that EPA is planning to eliminate the Energy Star program, which is a voluntary, non-regulatory labeling program with strong support from industry and consumers.
Energy Star has been incredibly effective at supporting American manufacturing, enabling people to lower energy bills, and reducing strain on our electricity system.
This seems obviously in line with the President’s energy and economic agenda, and yet, there may be an effort underway to terminate the program.
If we cannot even find common ground on a broadly popular, voluntary, low-cost program to benefit consumers, I have serious doubts that we will be able to find anything to agree upon this year.
Mr. Administrator, I appreciate you being here, and I hope we can work together to ensure that your agency and this committee have a productive, transparent relationship that honors the critical public health and scientific mission of the EPA.
Source: City of Norwich
Published on Tuesday, 20th May 2025
Leader of Norwich City Council, Councillor Mike Stonard announced a fresh re-shuffle of the authority’s cabinet at this afternoon’s full council meeting.
Cabinet functions as the executive body of the council and is where the majority of the authority’s key decisions are made. Its members are appointed by the leader and then given areas of responsibility called portfolios where they collectively oversee the delivery of public services to local residents.
Cabinet has seven positions in total, with Councillor Gurpreet Padda joining the cabinet for the first time, taking on the Equalities and Social Justice portfolio.
“Whilst it’s critical that the council’s leadership remains stable, the time is now right for us to bring in people with fresh ideas. That’s why I’m pleased to welcome Councillor Padda to the cabinet and I look forward to working with her on our ambitious plans for the future of Norwich.
“I’m particularly proud that this new cabinet reflects the diversity of our city – with strong representation of women and the appointment of our first cabinet member from an ethnic minority background, who will lead on equalities and social justice. The average age of the cabinet has also fallen to around 44, bringing a new and energetic perspective to our leadership team.
“Additionally, our new cabinet will ensure we are better equipped to deal with both the challenges and the opportunities of local government reorganisation and our vision of a three-unitary model for Norfolk.”
Norwich City Council’s cabinet:
For more details from this afternoon’s full council meeting, please visit https://bit.ly/NorwichCouncilMeeting
Source: The Conversation – UK – By Stefan Wolff, Professor of International Security, University of Birmingham
After a two-hour phone call with Russian leader Vladimir Putin on May 19, US president Donald Trump took to social media to declare that Russia and Ukraine will “immediately start negotiations” towards a ceasefire and an end to the war. He did, however, add that the conditions for peace “will be negotiated between the two parties, as it can only be”.
With the Vatican, according to Trump, “very interested in hosting the negotiations” and European leaders duly informed, it seems clear that the US has effectively abandoned its stalled mediation efforts to end the war in Ukraine.
It was always a possibility that Trump could walk away from the war, despite previous claims he could end it in 24 hours. This only became more likely on May 16, when the first face-to-face negotiations between Ukraine and Russia for more than three years predictably ended without a ceasefire agreement.
When Trump announced shortly afterwards that he would be speaking to his Russian and Ukrainian counterparts by phone a few days later, he effectively mounted the beginning of a rearguard action. This was further underlined when, shortly before the Trump-Putin call, Vice-President J.D. Vance, explicitly told reporters that the US could end its shuttle diplomacy.
Get your news from actual experts, straight to your inbox. Sign up to our daily newsletter to receive all The Conversation UK’s latest coverage of news and research, from politics and business to the arts and sciences.
The meagre outcomes of the talks between Russia and Ukraine – as well as between Trump and Putin – are not surprising. Russia is clearly not ready for any concessions yet. It keeps insisting that Ukraine accept its maximalist demands of territorial concessions and future neutrality.
Putin also continues to slow-walk any negotiations. After his call with Trump, he reportedly said that “Russia will offer and is ready to work with Ukraine on a memorandum on a possible future peace agreement”, including “a possible ceasefire for a certain period of time, should relevant agreements be reached.”
The lack of urgency on Russia’s part to end the fighting and, in fact, the Kremlin’s ability and willingness to continue the war was emphasised the day before the Trump-Putin call. Russia carried out its largest drone attack against Ukraine so far in the war, targeting several regions including Kyiv.
There has been no let-up in the fighting since. And the fact that Putin spoke to Trump while visiting a music school in the southern Russian city of Sochi does not suggest that a ceasefire in Ukraine is high on the Russian leader’s priority list.
A large part of the Kremlin’s calculation seems to be its desire to strike a grand bargain with the White House on a broader reset of relations between the US and Russia. It is signalling clearly that this is more important than the war in Ukraine and might even happen without the fighting there ending.
This also appears to be driving thinking in Washington. Trump foreshadowed an improvement in bilateral relations by describing the “tone and spirit” of his conversation with Putin as “excellent”. He also seemed pleased about the prospects of “large-scale trade” with Russia.
Trump is on record as saying that there would be no progress towards peace in Ukraine until he and Putin get together. But it is worth bearing mind that very little movement towards a ceasefire in Ukraine – let alone a peace agreement – occurred after the last phone call between the two presidents in February.
Part of this lack of progress has been Trump’s reluctance to put any real pressure on Putin. And despite agreement in Brussels and preparations in Washington for an escalation in sanctions against Russia, it is unlikely that Trump will change his approach.
In this context, the sequence in which the calls occurred is telling. Trump and Ukraine’s president, Volodymyr Zelensky, had a short call before the former spoke with Putin. Zelensky said he told Trump not to make decisions about Ukraine “without us”.
But rather than presenting Putin with a clear ultimatum to accept a ceasefire, Trump apparently discussed future relations with Putin at great length before informing Zelensky and key European allies that the war in Ukraine is now solely their problem to solve.
This has certainly raised justifiable fears in Kyiv and European capitals that, for the sake of a reset with Russia, the US might yet completely abandon its allies across the Atlantic.
However, if a reset with Russia at any cost really is Trump’s strategy, it is bound to fail. As much as Putin seems willing to continue with his aggression against Ukraine, Zelensky is as unwilling to surrender. Putin can rely on China’s continued backing while Zelensky can count on support from Europe.
Supporting Russia’s war in Ukraine is essential for China to keep Moscow on side in its rivalry with the US. And for Europe, supporting Ukraine has become an existential question of deterring and containing a revisionist Russia hell-bent on restoring a Soviet-style sphere of influence in central and eastern Europe.
In a world that has been in flux since Trump’s return to the White House, these are some of the emerging constants. And they make a US-Russia reset highly improbable.
Even if it were to happen, it would not strengthen Washington’s position with Beijing. Walking away from Ukraine and Europe now will deprive the US of the very allies it will need in the long term to prevail in its rivalry with China.
By abandoning his mediation between Moscow and Kyiv, Trump may have broken the deadlock in his efforts to achieve a reset with Russia. But getting this deal over the line will be a pyrrhic victory.
Stefan Wolff is a past recipient of grant funding from the Natural Environment Research Council of the UK, the United States Institute of Peace, the Economic and Social Research Council of the UK, the British Academy, the NATO Science for Peace Programme, the EU Framework Programmes 6 and 7 and Horizon 2020, as well as the EU’s Jean Monnet Programme. He is a Trustee and Honorary Treasurer of the Political Studies Association of the UK and a Senior Research Fellow at the Foreign Policy Centre in London.
– ref. After another call with Putin, it looks like Trump has abandoned efforts to mediate peace in Ukraine – https://theconversation.com/after-another-call-with-putin-it-looks-like-trump-has-abandoned-efforts-to-mediate-peace-in-ukraine-257021
Source: The Conversation – Africa – By Papa Sow, Senior Researcher, The Nordic Africa Institute
Benin’s Pendjari Biosphere Reserve, also called Pendjari National Park, and its surroundings have been targeted by non-state armed groups since 2019.
Pendjari National Park, which covers approximately 4,800km², is one of five protected areas in Benin and is one of the main biodiversity conservation areas in west Africa. It has been a World Heritage Site since 2017.
It is an integral part of the W-Arly-Pendjari complex, a transboundary biosphere reserve. The W Park is shared by Niger, Benin and Burkina Faso. Arly is located in Burkina Faso and Pendjari in Benin.
The geographical configuration of the park facilitates all kinds of movements. Non-state armed groups attempt to exploit the porous borders to hide, stock up on natural resources — including gold and poached wildlife — or turn them into rear bases. Non-state armed groups take advantage of the park’s inaccessibility and its dense, wild forests to turn them into refuges.
Bloody battles are underway to conquer special forest territories, which I call “protected jihadism areas” because of their use by armed movements claiming to be jihadists.
As part of a study on the causes of migration in and from the northern parts of Benin Republic, close to Burkina Faso, Niger, Togo and Nigeria, I analysed the impact that these non-state armed groups were having on local populations and protected areas.
I have been working on migration issues for about 25 years, and most of my observations in west Africa show that armed groups cause displacements in the sub-region. They contribute to a land and pastoral crisis, inconsistency in the distribution of forest resources, and a poorly integrated approach to the management of protected areas.
I interviewed experts, local journalists, research assistants who I worked with during several years and displaced people in Benin and the west African sub-region about the direct impacts of smuggling, the depletion of natural resources, threats, and the use of violence in forest reserves.
My observations are that the spiral of violence by non-state armed groups is dangerously disrupting the conservation and protection of the environment, increasing fear and insecurity among communities, and ruining the local economy, especially activities that revolve around the tourism sector.
On 8 January 2025, close to 30 soldiers were killed in the north of Benin, in Karimama near the “Triple Point” – an extensive area in the W-Arly-Pendjari complex where Benin, Niger and Burkina Faso meet.
More than 120 soldiers were killed in the area between 2021 and 2024. There has also been carnage of the animals and plants.
Since 2018, the Katiba Ansar-ul Islam, Serma, Sekou Muslimou and Abou Hanifa have been operating in Burkina Faso. They are considered jihadists – mostly under the aegis of Jama’a Nusrat ul-Islam wa al-Muslimin (JNIM), the Al Qaeda branch in the Sahel.
Reasons for the proliferation of non-state armed groups in the park are multiple. It’s difficult for the state authorities to reach them there. There is the battle among non-state armed groups over the control of pastures and water bodies in the area. The park is also a place where non-state armed groups work with traffickers of adulterated gasoline from Nigeria, called Kpayo in Benin. They buy thousands of litres of gasoline from them every week at exorbitant prices.
The Beninese state is is not very visible in some places despite the anti-terrorist Operation Mirador launched in 2021 with more than 3,000 soldiers. Since the first attack in 2019, more than US$120 million has been spent on security by Benin. But the number of attacks and kidnappings has multiplied.
The main reason is the fragility of the security of the three state border areas.
The non-State armed groups have their own crossing points that they control. Sub-regional collaboration between states is almost non-existent. The 2017 Accra Initiative, composed of five countries – Benin, Burkina Faso, Ghana, Côte d’Ivoire and Togo – seems to have stagnated since some member states pulled out of the regional grouping Ecowas. A genuine regional force capable of countering the activities of these non-state armed groups is necessary.
Benin is developing a military partnership with France. But the already tense diplomatic relationship between Benin and its neighbours – Niger and Burkina Faso – and the ambivalent policy of Togo, which “threatens” to join the Alliance of Sahel States – are not factors conducive to effective regional military cooperation.
The park depends, in part, on funding generated by tourism and external partners. Conservation has been managed, since 2020, by the APN – Rangers African Parks Network. In 2024, it employed 337 eco-guards, including six expatriates. These eco-guards, on the front lines against non-state armed groups, are also being killed. Their work in gathering threat-related information is important to the Beninese Armed Forces.
The activities of residents living near the park, transport networks and systems, and trekking services are the hardest hit. The work of NGOs that supported local populations has been reduced. Many NGOs have withdrawn from their activities. Small businesses are under threat.
But the hardest-hit sector is tourism, which has affected the livelihoods of people. There has been a significant decline in the number of tourists. This directly affects local communities for whom tourism activities remain an important source of income.
Tanguiéta, a town 70km from the border with Burkina Faso and not far from Pendjari Park, has been the worst affected due to a decline in income from accommodation and catering activities. Jobs have been lost.
Migrants from the sub-region who had specialised in tourism entrepreneurship, including tour guides and artisans, have turned to other activities or left the town.
The following measures could help protect the park and local people:
strengthen communication and surveillance capabilities
increase surveillance aircraft, helicopters and drones with the support of international donors and the Ecowas
train Beninese Armed Forces in conservation practices
increase support for community development projects
diversify activities to reduce dependence on tourism.
Papa Sow does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.
– ref. Armed groups are invading Benin’s forest reserves. Why and what to do about it – https://theconversation.com/armed-groups-are-invading-benins-forest-reserves-why-and-what-to-do-about-it-256136
Source: The Conversation – Africa – By Papa Sow, Senior Researcher, The Nordic Africa Institute
Benin’s Pendjari Biosphere Reserve, also called Pendjari National Park, and its surroundings have been targeted by non-state armed groups since 2019.
Pendjari National Park, which covers approximately 4,800km², is one of five protected areas in Benin and is one of the main biodiversity conservation areas in west Africa. It has been a World Heritage Site since 2017.
It is an integral part of the W-Arly-Pendjari complex, a transboundary biosphere reserve. The W Park is shared by Niger, Benin and Burkina Faso. Arly is located in Burkina Faso and Pendjari in Benin.
The geographical configuration of the park facilitates all kinds of movements. Non-state armed groups attempt to exploit the porous borders to hide, stock up on natural resources — including gold and poached wildlife — or turn them into rear bases. Non-state armed groups take advantage of the park’s inaccessibility and its dense, wild forests to turn them into refuges.
Bloody battles are underway to conquer special forest territories, which I call “protected jihadism areas” because of their use by armed movements claiming to be jihadists.
As part of a study on the causes of migration in and from the northern parts of Benin Republic, close to Burkina Faso, Niger, Togo and Nigeria, I analysed the impact that these non-state armed groups were having on local populations and protected areas.
I have been working on migration issues for about 25 years, and most of my observations in west Africa show that armed groups cause displacements in the sub-region. They contribute to a land and pastoral crisis, inconsistency in the distribution of forest resources, and a poorly integrated approach to the management of protected areas.
I interviewed experts, local journalists, research assistants who I worked with during several years and displaced people in Benin and the west African sub-region about the direct impacts of smuggling, the depletion of natural resources, threats, and the use of violence in forest reserves.
My observations are that the spiral of violence by non-state armed groups is dangerously disrupting the conservation and protection of the environment, increasing fear and insecurity among communities, and ruining the local economy, especially activities that revolve around the tourism sector.
On 8 January 2025, close to 30 soldiers were killed in the north of Benin, in Karimama near the “Triple Point” – an extensive area in the W-Arly-Pendjari complex where Benin, Niger and Burkina Faso meet.
More than 120 soldiers were killed in the area between 2021 and 2024. There has also been carnage of the animals and plants.
Since 2018, the Katiba Ansar-ul Islam, Serma, Sekou Muslimou and Abou Hanifa have been operating in Burkina Faso. They are considered jihadists – mostly under the aegis of Jama’a Nusrat ul-Islam wa al-Muslimin (JNIM), the Al Qaeda branch in the Sahel.
Reasons for the proliferation of non-state armed groups in the park are multiple. It’s difficult for the state authorities to reach them there. There is the battle among non-state armed groups over the control of pastures and water bodies in the area. The park is also a place where non-state armed groups work with traffickers of adulterated gasoline from Nigeria, called Kpayo in Benin. They buy thousands of litres of gasoline from them every week at exorbitant prices.
The Beninese state is is not very visible in some places despite the anti-terrorist Operation Mirador launched in 2021 with more than 3,000 soldiers. Since the first attack in 2019, more than US$120 million has been spent on security by Benin. But the number of attacks and kidnappings has multiplied.
The main reason is the fragility of the security of the three state border areas.
The non-State armed groups have their own crossing points that they control. Sub-regional collaboration between states is almost non-existent. The 2017 Accra Initiative, composed of five countries – Benin, Burkina Faso, Ghana, Côte d’Ivoire and Togo – seems to have stagnated since some member states pulled out of the regional grouping Ecowas. A genuine regional force capable of countering the activities of these non-state armed groups is necessary.
Benin is developing a military partnership with France. But the already tense diplomatic relationship between Benin and its neighbours – Niger and Burkina Faso – and the ambivalent policy of Togo, which “threatens” to join the Alliance of Sahel States – are not factors conducive to effective regional military cooperation.
The park depends, in part, on funding generated by tourism and external partners. Conservation has been managed, since 2020, by the APN – Rangers African Parks Network. In 2024, it employed 337 eco-guards, including six expatriates. These eco-guards, on the front lines against non-state armed groups, are also being killed. Their work in gathering threat-related information is important to the Beninese Armed Forces.
The activities of residents living near the park, transport networks and systems, and trekking services are the hardest hit. The work of NGOs that supported local populations has been reduced. Many NGOs have withdrawn from their activities. Small businesses are under threat.
But the hardest-hit sector is tourism, which has affected the livelihoods of people. There has been a significant decline in the number of tourists. This directly affects local communities for whom tourism activities remain an important source of income.
Tanguiéta, a town 70km from the border with Burkina Faso and not far from Pendjari Park, has been the worst affected due to a decline in income from accommodation and catering activities. Jobs have been lost.
Migrants from the sub-region who had specialised in tourism entrepreneurship, including tour guides and artisans, have turned to other activities or left the town.
The following measures could help protect the park and local people:
strengthen communication and surveillance capabilities
increase surveillance aircraft, helicopters and drones with the support of international donors and the Ecowas
train Beninese Armed Forces in conservation practices
increase support for community development projects
diversify activities to reduce dependence on tourism.
– Armed groups are invading Benin’s forest reserves. Why and what to do about it
– https://theconversation.com/armed-groups-are-invading-benins-forest-reserves-why-and-what-to-do-about-it-256136
US Senate News:
Source: United States Senator Alex Padilla (D-Calif.)
Senator Padilla: “If this attempt is successful, the consequences will be far-reaching, not only for our clean energy economy, the air our children breathe, and for our climate, but for the future of the CRA and for the Senate as an institution.”
WASHINGTON, D.C. — U.S. Senator Alex Padilla (D-Calif.), Ranking Member of the Senate Committee on Rules and Administration and a member of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, placed a hold on the four pending Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) nominees until Republicans stop their reckless attempts to overrule the Senate Parliamentarian’s decision regarding California’s clean air waivers that allow the state to implement more protective air quality standards.
The Trump-led EPA recently submitted three California waivers as “rules” to Congress — despite knowing full well that these waivers were not rules — in a cynical attempt to overturn the waivers with a 50-vote threshold under the Congressional Review Act (CRA). The Senate Parliamentarian determined that any resolutions aimed at overturning California waivers would not be entitled to the CRA’s expedited procedures and would therefore require 60 votes to secure Senate passage. Reporting indicates that Senate Republicans may soon move forward to bypass the filibuster to rescind these waivers, which would require overruling the Parliamentarian.
Revoking California’s waivers would not only cause disastrous public health, environmental, and economic impacts, but would also mean Republicans took the “nuclear option,” undermining longstanding Senate procedures that could be applied to legislation far beyond the CRA and giving agencies significantly more control over the Senate floor.
“This objection is a direct result of the agency’s cynical attempt to weaponize the Congressional Review Act (CRA) by attempting to submit as ‘rules’ three waivers issued to the State of California under the Clean Air Act (CAA),” wrote Senator Padilla. “If this attempt is successful, the consequences will be far-reaching, not only for our clean energy economy, the air our children breathe, and for our climate, but for the future of the CRA and for the Senate as an institution.”
Padilla detailed the longstanding precedent making clear that EPA’s waivers are not rules subject to the Congressional Review Act. None of the more than 100 individual waivers or waiver-related decisions to California — under both Democratic and Republican Administrations — have ever been submitted as a rule since Congress granted the EPA this waiver authority in 1967 in bipartisan fashion. He also underscored the enormous stakes of overruling the Senate Parliamentarian, including for providing essential checks against executive branch agencies trying to exploit the CRA to enact their own agenda on matters that are not rules.
“Here, for the first time in the history of the CRA, an agency submitted matters that they knew were not rules. Some of my Republican colleagues are now arguing that the Parliamentarian should have no role to limit this partisan gamesmanship, and the Senate should throw out the rulebook and overturn the Parliamentarian,” continued Senator Padilla. “If the Trump EPA and Senate Republicans are successful at this ploy, the Senate will have no choice but to accept this as status quo in the future. This would grant agencies unchecked control over the Senate floor — an unprecedented encroachment by the executive branch into the Senate’s internal operations.”
Padilla laid out a list of potential actions that the Trump Administration could take to abuse the CRA, including revoking the broadcast licenses or other approvals for media outlets when they disagree with their news coverage; rescinding Food and Drug Administration approvals of vaccines, birth control, or mifepristone; or targeting the organizations of President Trump’s political opponents for retribution.
“None of these actions are rules, which is why they’ve never been submitted to Congress as rules. But if my Republican colleagues open this door and overturn the Parliamentarian’s wise safeguards on this type of abuse, there would be no practical limit, and the Senate could be forced to vote repeatedly on such matters that are clearly not ‘rules’ notwithstanding the plain language of the CRA,” added Senator Padilla.
By taking the nuclear option to overrule the Senate Parliamentarian, Padilla noted that a future Democratic Administration could target approvals for fossil fuel project leases, loan agreements, or permitting as well as for liquified natural gas (LNG) export terminals. They could also use the CRA to try to reverse the Trump Administration’s actions on matters including immigration, foreign policy, and staffing cuts.
“Since this cynical attempt to weaponize the CRA was triggered by the administration’s political leadership at the EPA, at the urging of their Big Oil allies, I must object to proceeding to any nominations for the EPA pending on the Senate’s executive calendar,” concluded Senator Padilla. “I will continue to object until the agency withdraws its false submissions to Congress or the Majority Leader commits not to overturn the Parliamentarian’s determination on this matter.”
A Senate hold blocks unanimous consent to speed up consideration of a nomination and forces the body to spend time debating and voting on the nominee. The EPA nominees currently pending on the Senate floor include Deputy Administrator nominee David Fotouhi, Chief Financial Officer nominee Catherine Hanson, and Assistant Administrator nominees Jessica Kramer and Aaron Szabo.
Senator Padilla has been outspoken in pushing back against Republican attacks on California’s Clean Air Act waivers. Earlier this month, Senators Padilla, Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), and Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), Ranking Member of the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, took to the Senate floor to sound the alarm on Senate Republicans’ consideration of moving forward with their plan to revoke California’s Clean Air Act waivers. Padilla, Whitehouse, and U.S. Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) also led Democratic Ranking Members in strongly warning Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) and Majority Whip John Barrasso (R-Wyo.) of the dangerous and irreparable consequences if Senate Republicans overrule the Senate Parliamentarian’s decision on California’s waivers.
Last month, Senators Padilla, Whitehouse, and Schiff welcomed the Senate Parliamentarian’s decision that the waivers are not subject to the CRA. Padilla also joined Whitehouse and Schiff in blasting Trump and EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin’s weaponization of the EPA after the Government Accountability Office’s (GAO) similar finding. Padilla and Schiff previously slammed the Trump Administration’s intent to roll back dozens of the EPA’s regulations that protect California’s air and water.
Full text of Padilla’s hold statement is available here.
Source: Channel Islands – Jersey
The Minister for the Environment, Deputy Steve Luce, has upheld the refusal of planning permission for the partial change of use from a restaurant to self-catering holiday accommodation, as well as various external alterations, at the former Nude Food Dunes restaurant at La Route de la Pulente.
The appeal was considered by an independent planning inspector, David Hainsworth, who recommended that planning permission be granted. However, the Minister was satisfied that there were sufficient reasons not to give effect to the inspector’s recommendation.
The Minister recognised that the proposed development had the potential to provide a new use for the currently vacant building, which is in a sensitive location of Jersey’s Coastal National Park. It would also offer the prospect of securing the reopening and maintenance of public toilets and the operation of a café. The Minister also agreed with the inspector that the proposed development would not harm the landscape character of the area.
On balance, however, the Minister considered that the proposed development presented overall conflict with the policies set out in the Government’s Island Plan. Specifically, the Minister considered that the redundancy of the existing approved use for the site had not been sufficiently demonstrated. Additionally, the design and layout failed to optimise the quality of the proposed uses for the site.
The Minister’s decision effectively upholds the original decision to refuse planning permission based on the first two reasons for refusal only.
See all planning details: Planning Application P/2024/0861.
Source: Tasmania Police
Issued: 20 May 2025
The hatchling crocodile was found in a fish tank inside the home and has now been placed at a farm or zoo.
A juvenile estuarine crocodile has been seized, and a man has been fined following a joint investigation in Cairns between the Department of the Environment, Tourism, Science and Innovation (DETSI) and the Queensland Police Service.
After receiving information from a concerned member of the public, police and DETSI’s Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service (QPWS) searched a home in Manoora on 16 May 2025.
The hatchling crocodile was found in a fish tank, and a man in his twenties was issued with a $2,419 Penalty Infringement Notice for unlawfully keeping the crocodile.
Acting Manager Northern Wildlife Operations, Dinouk Perera, said it is unlawful to keep estuarine and freshwater crocodiles in Queensland without a permit, and the animal was confiscated by QPWS officers.
“We believe the crocodile was captured as a hatchling and is now several months old,” Mr Perera said.
“The man admitted that he had broken the law by taking the crocodile from the wild and although he was remorseful, we take a zero-tolerance approach to the unlawful possession of wildlife.
“We have examined the crocodile and although it appears healthy, it cannot be released back into the wild as it may have been exposed to disease. It is destined for a life at a farm or zoo, or at an educational facility.
“The maximum court-ordered penalty for unlawfully keeping an estuarine crocodile is $36,292.”
Anyone with information about the deliberate taking, harming or killing of crocodiles, or the illegal trade of wildlife is urged to call 1300 130 372.
Translation. Region: Russian Federal
Source: Government of the Russian Federation – An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.
The XVI International Economic Forum “Russia – Islamic World: KazanForum” is aimed at strengthening the comprehensive cooperation between Russia and Muslim states. It was held in Kazan from May 13 to 18.
“We see that the forum is absolutely in demand and needed both by our country and by the countries of the Islamic world. Every year KazanForum is gaining more and more momentum. This year the program included more than 200 events, including 148 business sessions with the participation of 990 speakers. The forum was a record-breaking one in terms of its effectiveness: 130 agreements and memorandums were concluded on its platform, including 75 international ones, for a total of more than 1 billion rubles,” said Deputy Prime Minister, Chairman of the Organizing Committee for the preparation and holding of the International Economic Forum “Russia – Islamic World: KazanForum” Marat Khusnullin.
In 2025, representatives from 96 countries and 82 Russian regions took part in the forum events.
The key topics for 2025 were digitalization of cooperation between Russia and the countries of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), international cooperation, a real estate exhibition and conference, sports, the halal industry, Islamic finance and investment, tourism, culture, a female perspective, business, economics, personnel today and tomorrow, science and technology, and media activities.
A meeting of the strategic vision group “Russia – Islamic world” was held within the framework of KazanForum. The meeting was devoted to issues of youth policy and cooperation in the humanitarian sphere. The meeting was chaired by Rais of the Republic of Tatarstan, Chairman of the strategic vision group “Russia – Islamic world” Rustam Minnikhanov.
In addition to the meetings of the forum and the Russia-Islamic World Strategic Vision Group, plenary sessions of the AAOIFI (Accounting and Auditing Organization for Islamic Financial Institutions), the international symposium on the Islamic Urban Environment (IBEIS 2025), the International Forum of Chambers of Commerce and Industry, the 11th Kazan Forum of Young Entrepreneurs of the OIC Countries, a meeting of the North-South International Transport Corridor, and a congress of ministers of culture of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation were held. The plenary session was attended by ministers of culture and representatives of the ministries of culture of 12 countries, the Director General of the Department of Public Arts of Iraq, the Chairman of the Organization for Culture and Islamic Relations of Iran, representatives of the embassies of 5 states in the Russian Federation, as well as the Director of the OIC Department of Culture, the Director General of ISESCO and a representative of the League of Arab States in the Russian Federation.
The forum became the venue for 10 meetings of representatives of Russia and foreign countries in various formats – from pitch sessions to business forums. In particular, events on international cooperation “Russia – UAE”, “Russia – MENA countries”, “Russia – Afghanistan”, “Russia – Turkey”, “Russia – Malaysia”, “Russia – Iran”, “Russia – Tajikistan”, “Russia – Kazakhstan”, “Russia – Qatar” were held.
The international exhibition Russia Halal Expo was organized for the 8th time within the framework of the forum. This is the largest exhibition in Russia of economic and scientific-technological cooperation of the regions of the Russian Federation and the OIC countries. The exhibition presents 54 stands from 12 countries.
This year, the International Property Market real estate exhibition was organized for the 2nd time within the framework of KazanForum – a unique platform designed to strengthen international ties and interaction with investors from different countries. The exhibition part of IPM 2025 was spread over an area of more than 1 thousand square meters. The participants of the exhibition were 57 companies, including 29 developers and builders, among which were stands from the UAE, Azerbaijan and Turkey.
As part of the forum, the opening of the XV All-Russian Forum of Tatar Religious Figures “National Identity and Religion” took place in the Kazan Agro-Industrial Park. The forum traditionally brought together more than 1,000 imams, Islamic scholars, representatives of the clergy, and public figures from 74 regions of the Russian Federation. On the final day of the forum, delegates went to the ancient city of Bolgar, where they took part in the ceremonial event “Izge Bolgar zyeeny”, which brought together about 25,000 people from Russia and abroad.
“For the Russian Federation, a state that unites many nations and people of different faiths, partnership with the Islamic world has been and remains one of the most important areas of foreign policy. Russia and the countries of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation actively interact on the basis of balanced approaches to a number of global problems, are involved in the formation of a new world order, showing by their example the possibility of a conflict-free dialogue of civilizations,” said the head of the Republic of Tatarstan Rustam Minnikhanov.
Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.
Source: Greenpeace Statement –
TASMAN SEA, Tuesday 20, May 2025 – A new analysis of latest fisheries data by Greenpeace Australia Pacific has revealed widespread devastation of near-threatened sharks in the Pacific Ocean by industrial longline fishers. The analysis estimates that almost half a million blue sharks were caught as bycatch in the region in 2023, the highest number in recorded history since 1991.
Greenpeace Australia Pacific estimates around 438,500 near-threatened blue sharks, almost 50 million kilograms, were caught as bycatch in the region in 2023 from Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission (WFCPFC) data. The figure is double 2015 numbers.
Georgia Whitaker, Senior Campaigner at Greenpeace Australia Pacific, said:
“The data is deeply disturbing – it’s a devastating record and a testament to the destructive nature of the industrial fishing industry. Sharks and other animals dying by the hundreds of thousands a year in this one patch of ocean, brutally killed by a legal and indiscriminate fishing practice like longlining. This is an appalling legacy our global leaders are leaving while the blue lungs of our planet are already facing chronic decline. Industrial fishing is sucking our ocean dry, fuelling the biodiveristy crisis, and pushing prehistoric animals like sharks to the brink of extinction. Healthy shark populations are central to a healthy ocean – this is a loss we can’t afford.”
The blue shark is by far the most common bycatch in the region and the world, making up 80-90% of all shark catches across the WCPFC in the last nine years. Between Australia and New Zealand in the Tasman Sea region, blue sharks made up more than 90% of the shark bycatch from longline fishers.
Ahead of the United Nations Oceans Conference in Nice, France in June, Greenpeace Australia Pacific is calling on the Albanese government to ratify the Global Ocean Treaty in the first 100 days in government and protect the region. Australia signed the treaty in 2023 but is yet to bring it into force.
“There is no better time for Australia to be leaders in ocean protection on the world stage. Every day that passes without the treaty in force, animals are being pushed closer to the brink of extinction from industrial fisheries in the high seas. The Global Ocean Treaty was a historic win, but we can’t rest now – we need Australia to ratify the treaty and propose ocean sanctuaries in the high seas between Australia and New Zealand to give our oceans and marine life a chance to rest, recover and thrive,” Whitaker said.
A recent report by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUNC) revealed one-third of sharks worldwide are endangered, and two-thirds of those endangered are at risk of extinction from overfishing. Blue Sharks are listed as Near Threatened and Largely Depleted by the IUCN.
The analysis also revealed the biologically significant area of the Lord Howe Rise and South Tasman Sea areas, between Australia and New Zealand, had some of the highest rates of birds as bycatch, with 13% of bycatch from longliners being seabirds like albatross.
—ENDS—
For more information or to arrange an interview, please contact Kimberley Bernard on +61 407 581 404 or [email protected]
Notes to Editor
High res images and footage of Australia’s oceans can be found here and here
Full analysis available at request
Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)
New York City, May 20, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Introduction – Best Indoor Antenna For HD TV
In an age dominated by streaming platforms and digital subscriptions, the value of local TV channels hasn’t faded. In fact, millions across the country—especially those in remote or rural regions—still depend on free over-the-air (OTA) broadcasts. Yet, with increasing distance from signal towers, many face frustrating signal dropouts, pixelated screens, or limited channel access.
This is where indoor antennas have re-emerged as essential tools for clear, consistent viewing. One standout solution, designed with rural signal challenges in mind, is the BroadWave HDTV Antenna. As we move through 2025, this antenna has become a top pick for households seeking high-definition clarity without expensive service fees.
This review explores why BroadWave is gaining attention, how it performs in low-signal zones, and how it compares to other popular options available today.
✅ Top Pick: BroadWave Antenna – Best Indoor Antenna for HD TV & Powerful Signal Reception this year.
Why Indoor Antennas Still Matter in 2025
Despite the growth of streaming, there’s a significant segment of viewers who rely on antennas—particularly in areas where broadband infrastructure remains limited. Indoor antennas offer:
These devices also serve as backup solutions during outages or emergencies when internet-based services fail.
For those living outside city centers, cutting the cord becomes practical only with reliable access to local broadcasts. That’s why indoor antennas—especially long-range models—continue to matter now more than ever.
Tired of poor signal? See why this is ranked the Best Indoor Antenna of 2025 →
Challenges of TV Reception in Rural Areas
Rural environments present unique obstacles for signal transmission:
Many indoor antennas marketed as “long-range” struggle under these conditions, leading to poor channel availability or frequent signal loss.
This makes it essential to choose a model engineered for strong amplification, wide reception angles, and robust performance in less-than-ideal locations. BroadWave fits this mold and aims to solve these common headaches.
What to Look for in a Top Indoor Antenna
When shopping for an indoor antenna—particularly if you live in a rural or suburban area—focus on features that directly impact performance:
The BroadWave Antenna brings together all these elements into one streamlined unit—designed to serve even in tough environments.
Rural? Weak signal? This antenna goes CRAZY Best Indoor Antenna 2025
BroadWave Antenna Review
For several years, we have been caught in this never-ending loop of paying hefty cable bills and artificial satellite bills just to watch our favourite television channels. Every single month the subscription rates have tended to get expensive and sometimes the provider also bundles up channels out of which mostly we might watch just one or two. Even streaming services which were known to be low priced. A couple of years ago they also increased their rates leaving many of our households on the hunt to find some solution that helps us enjoy entertainment at the comfort of our home without burning a hole in our pockets.
We currently live in a world where streaming dominated entertainment is trending and in such an environment, traditional television antennas will be outdated. This is where the BroadWave antenna comes in. The BroadWave antenna is a high definition TV antenna designed to air over the air broadcast signals without having the need for any satellite subscription or cable subscriptions. Released in the year 2021 by a company called Tech Wave communications Which is subordinate to the electronics manufacturing company, Global Tech industries, this BroadWave antenna has started gaining popularity at a fast pace in the community that is currently cord cutting. With the BroadWave antenna, you will be able to access your favourite television channels by cutting the cord and enjoying this digital solution to the maximum by eliminating those expensive cable bills. While you are still having access to dozens of channels which are all high definition. In this comprehensive guide, we will be exploring how the BroadWave antenna works, what are its benefits, the setup process, And everything else that you need to know before making the purchase decision.
Best Indoor Antenna for rural homes – limited stock available! Grab yours at -50%
A short brief introduction to BroadWave Antenna
The company Tech Wave communications proudly showcases BroadWave antenna as their premium flagship product in the space that is currently called cutting and positions this product with enhanced performance with budget alternatives. Physically, the PW antenna has a very modern and sleek design with a really thin profile at just 0.2 inches in thickness and it measures 12 X 14 inches making it the most compact option in the market today. It makes use of a technology that uses advanced signal reception that includes proprietary signal and application, which the manufacturer claims helps receive signals from up to 75 miles away. Situated broadcast towers in optimal conditions. The beat antenna is made from materials such as durable polymer, which are integrated with copper Elements for better reception.
This device comes in two different variations: the standard BroadWave antenna and the BroadWave antenna pro that comes along with an extra signal booster meant for environments where perception of signals can be quite challenging. Both the models feature the patented CleanSignal technology, technology of the company, which filters out FM signal interference and cellular signal interference to achieve better sound quality and clear pictures.
Understanding its working mechanism
The BroadWave antenna captures OTA television signals, but with several technological enhancements which helps it stand out from the other TV antennas. It functions very similar to the traditional antenna by working on the basic principles of electromagnetic wave reception.
But the modern digital technology added to the BroadWave antenna is what makes it stronger. Unlike the regular subscription services that transmit the content via satellite dishes or cables, the BroadWave antenna Will intercept these free broadcast signals which are already moving from the air around your home or office.
At the core, this antenna catches radio frequency waves sent out by television stations locally. And the signals travel within the atmosphere and are ready to be received by anybody within the range who are equipped with proper devices. Three main types of broadcast signals are captured by BroadWave antenna, they are:
No fees. No subscriptions. Just crystal-clear TV with BroadWave Antenna!
When local TV stations send out broadcasts, those signals travel through the air from large transmission towers. The BroadWave Antenna is specifically designed to pick up these signals by aligning with the same frequency range. The fewer obstacles between your antenna and the tower, the better the signal quality you’ll get.
After the antenna picks up the broadcast, it sends the signal to your television using a regular coaxial cable. Most modern TVs already come with built-in tuners that recognize and decode these signals, so there’s no need for any extra devices. Just plug the antenna into your TV’s coaxial port, run a quick channel scan, and you’re ready to watch.
One of the best things about the BroadWave Antenna is how easy it is to use. There are no apps, no subscriptions, and no tech setup needed. It’s truly a plug-and-play solution — perfect for anyone who wants reliable access to free, over-the-air channels without the hassle.
BroadWave Setup Guide: Simple 3-Step Install
Once complete, your free HD channels will be available instantly. Pro tip: Mount higher for better range if you’re in a low valley or heavily wooded area.
BroadWave HDTV Antenna – up to 80 mile range, now 50% off. Order here →
Benefits of using BroadWave Antenna
The BroadWave antenna provides its consumers with umpteen number of compelling advantages, let’s take a look at some of them:
Where can one purchase BroadWave Antenna? What’s the price?
Although the BroadWave antenna is available across several retail channels, we always encourage you to purchase it from the official website only as it ensures that 100% authentic product is delivered at your doorstep. In addition to this, purchasing from the official site, will give you an opportunity to enjoy promotional discounts and offers, bundle deals, and special pricing. The pricing is as follows:
The company also provides a 30 days money back guarantee. However, we recommend that the customers read all the terms and conditions of the return and refund policy.
Real User Reviews: What Rural Users Are Saying
Tracy H. – Boone, NC
“We live between two mountain ridges, and no antenna worked—until BroadWave. Now we get over 35 channels, all in crystal-clear HD.”
George P. – Twin Falls, ID
“It’s the only antenna that pulled in FOX and NBC from over 90 miles away. Super easy to install too.”
Lana M. – Waco, TX
“Was skeptical at first, but setup was smooth, and now I get my local news and weather without lag.”
Dennis B. – Sioux Falls, SD
“BroadWave outperformed my old Leaf and never needs adjustment. For rural homes, it’s a clear win.”
Struggling with weak signals? BroadWave Antenna is the fix. Claim deal →
FAQs About Indoor Antennas & BroadWave
Q: How many channels can I get in rural areas?
A: Users report access to 30–50+ channels depending on location and weather.
Q: Is BroadWave better than outdoor antennas?
A: For many, yes—especially if they want an easier indoor setup without climbing rooftops.
Q: Will it work with my smart TV?
A: Yes. It connects via the antenna port and functions independently of your internet.
Q: What do Reddit and online forums say?
A: Many rural users share success stories about finally getting consistent signal without dropouts.
Q: Does rain affect the reception?
A: Not significantly. However, placing it near a window and keeping it elevated helps.
Pros of using the BroadWave Antenna
No cable. No contracts. Just clear TV. Order the Best HDTV Antenna →
Cons of using the BroadWave Antenna
While the BW antenna does offer numerous benefits, we also would like to drink for certain limitations that some users faced while using the antenna. Let’s have a look at some of the drawbacks:
Special Offer: BroadWave Antenna Is Available With 50% Discount!
BroadWave vs. Other Indoor Antennas
Here’s how BroadWave compares to other models commonly used in remote areas:
ClearStream Eclipse
Mohu Leaf 50
GE UltraPro
✅ BroadWave Advantage
For households outside urban cores, BroadWave offers more consistent performance without the price hike.
Conclusion
After doing comprehensive analysis of everything that BroadWave antenna has to offer, we can say that if you are a person living in urban or suburban areas, this particular cordless antenna will be the most beneficial investment. The fact that it comes with an easy setup, process, and will eliminate your monthly subscription billing, You will enjoy several dozens of free HD quality channels, the BroadWave antenna is definitely worth trying. The company also offers excellent deals and a good 30-day money back guarantee which makes your investment risk free. This antenna is well suited for secondary televisions in kitchens or bedrooms or where premium content access is very crucial. This leak design ensures that it occupies less space while providing excellent results in terms of reception of signals. Gone are the other days where you found yourself frustrated over monthly payments for acting good entertainment, with BW antenna, you will be able to enjoy the entertaining part of media as well as essential channels to keep you updated about what is happening across the globe.
How to Improve Indoor Antenna Performance in Rural Areas
Even the most powerful antenna can fall short if not placed or configured properly. If you’re using BroadWave or any high-range model in a rural setting, these small adjustments can greatly enhance signal strength:
Simple tweaks like these can transform a weak, pixelated feed into reliable, crisp HD channels—even in off-grid regions.
Best Indoor Antenna for rural homes – limited stock available! Grab yours →
BroadWave Antenna vs. Satellite TV: Cost & Performance
For rural viewers, satellite TV is often marketed as the only viable choice. However, it comes with hidden downsides:
In contrast, BroadWave is a one-time purchase with no recurring charges. Once installed, it delivers free access to major networks with dependable reception—even in bad weather. It also doesn’t require any subscription or installation service, making it a smart, budget-friendly alternative for long-term use.
Who Should Buy BroadWave Antenna?
BroadWave isn’t just for one type of viewer—it’s tailored for anyone who wants quality TV access without ongoing costs or complex setups:
It’s also a solid backup during internet outages or emergencies, ensuring you stay connected to local alerts and news broadcasts.
Don’t wait till BroadWave Antenna gone! Best Indoor Antenna flying off shelves!
Can You Use BroadWave With Streaming Devices?
Yes—combining BroadWave with your favorite streaming stick or smart TV makes for a complete, cable-free entertainment setup. Here’s how:
This hybrid approach gives you both live sports, local news, and premium content—without paying a cable company.
Troubleshooting: Common Setup Mistakes & Fixes
If your antenna setup isn’t delivering the results you expected, the problem might not be with the product. Here are common mistakes and quick fixes:
Following these simple steps can quickly restore clear, reliable channels—even in tougher signal zones.
Unlock 50+ channels in minutes – Shop the Best Indoor Antenna now →
Indoor vs. Outdoor Antennas: Which is Right for You?
While outdoor antennas have long been preferred in rural areas, indoor models like BroadWave now challenge that narrative. Here’s a quick comparison:
Outdoor Antennas
BroadWave Indoor Antenna
Unless you live in an extremely remote location with signal-blocking terrain, BroadWave can meet or exceed outdoor performance—without the inconvenience, maintenance, or cost.
Final Verdict: Is BroadWave the Best Indoor Antenna in 2025?
If you’re tired of unreliable reception and want a no-fuss solution that works, BroadWave is a top-tier choice for 2025. Its long-distance range, built-in amplifier, and plug-and-play convenience make it an ideal fit for remote households and cabins.
Compared to popular models, BroadWave consistently delivers more channels, clearer visuals, and better ease of use—all without monthly fees or climbing ladders to install.
For rural living, it’s one of the most capable antennas available today.
Project name: BroadWave
Straight Commerce Inc.,
100 Church Street, 8th Floor,
New York, NY 10007, United States
Media Contact:
Full Name – Neil Bowers
Company website: https://get-broadwaveantenna.com/
email: help@spark-tek.co
+14242504182
Disclosure: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. The content may include affiliate links, meaning we may earn a commission if you purchase through recommended links. Always consult a healthcare professional before starting any new supplement regimen.
Attachment
Source: United States House of Representatives – Congresswoman María Elvira Salazar’s (FL-27)
strong>(Washington, D.C.) – Today marks a major victory for victims of online exploitation and a defining moment in digital and child safety: President Donald J. Trump has officially signed the TAKE IT DOWN Act into law. The bipartisan, bicameral legislation—originally introduced in the House by Rep. María Elvira Salazar (FL-27) and in the Senate by Sen. Ted Cruz (TX)—will protect Americans from the non-consensual distribution of intimate images, including AI-generated deepfakes.
“Today, through the ‘TAKE IT DOWN’ Act, we affirm that the well-being of our children is central to the future of our families and America. I am proud to say that the values of BE BEST will be reflected in the law of the land,” said First Lady Melania Trump.
“The signing of my TAKE IT DOWN Act is a historic moment in our fight to protect children online. I’m grateful to President Trump and First Lady Melania Trump for standing with us against the growing threat of online exploitation and AI abuse. For the first time, victims have real legal protection, and parents have a powerful tool to fight back and protect their children from digital threats. Predators will finally face the full force of the law,” said Rep. Maria Salazar.
“The TAKE IT DOWN ACT is an historic win for victims of revenge porn and deepfake image abuse. Predators who weaponize new technology to post this exploitative filth will now rightfully face criminal consequences, and Big Tech will no longer be allowed to turn a blind eye to the spread of this vile material. This day stands as a powerful testament to the bravery and dedication of Elliston Berry, Francesca Mani, Breeze Liu, and Brandon Guffey, whose relentless advocacy made this law possible. I am deeply grateful to my legislative partners, particularly Sen. Amy Klobuchar and First Lady Melania Trump, for their collaboration in advancing this critical legislation to protect every American’s privacy and dignity online,” said Sen. Ted Cruz.
“I am overjoyed that our bipartisan TAKE IT DOWN Act is now law — a monumental step in the fight to protect Americans’ privacy, empower victims, and address sexually explicit AI deepfakes. This was made possible by many advocates and partners — including Representatives Salazar and Dingell in the House, Senators Cruz and Klobuchar in the Senate, and the President and First Lady. Today is evidence that when we work together, we can accomplish important work for the American people,” said Rep Madeleine Dean.
“In an age where personal images can be stolen and weaponized in seconds, the signing of the TAKE IT DOWN Act into law marks a pivotal step forward. Our bipartisan law creates the first federal protections against non-consensual intimate imagery and AI-generated deepfakes—finally giving survivors the right to reclaim control and hold offenders accountable. I’m proud to have championed this legislation alongside Rep. Salazar, whose leadership was instrumental to this achievement,” said Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick.
“The publication of sexually exploitative images—including AI-generated deepfakes – is a terrifying and destructive part of the digital age. I applaud the First Lady for bringing attention to this issue, and the Problem Solvers Caucus will work with her across party lines to pass the TAKE IT DOWN Act to address these reprehensible acts. Let it be the first of many actions we take in this Congress to get things done,” said Problem Solvers Caucus Co-Chair Rep. Tom Suozzi.
With the President’s signature, the TAKE IT DOWN law now becomes the strongest federal tool to date for combatting “revenge porn,” digital harassment, and image-based sexual abuse. This new law sends a clear message to both predators and platforms: online exploitation will no longer be tolerated, and accountability will be enforced at every level. It is a major win for families and parents across America who can finally feel more secure knowing their children are better protected in today’s digital world.
The law addresses the growing threat of deepfake technology, which allows perpetrators to create explicit, realistic images—usually of women and girls—without consent. Many victims don’t discover these images until after serious harm is done. By setting clear federal standards and requiring swift takedowns, the law closes a dangerous gap that left victims with little recourse.
Rep. María Elvira Salazar led the charge in the House, reintroducing the bill in January 2025. First Lady Melania Trump played a pivotal role in elevating the issue, hosting a high-profile roundtable on Capitol Hill and mobilizing bipartisan support. The law was passed unanimously in the Senate in February 2025 and received final approval in the House soon after.
The TAKE IT DOWN Act has earned support from over 120 organizations, including major tech companies like Meta, Snap, Google, TikTok, X (formerly Twitter), and Amazon, as well as advocacy groups.
The TAKE IT DOWN Act addresses these issues while protecting lawful speech by:
A Legislative Milestone for Rep. Salazar
The TAKE IT DOWN Act is the ninth piece of legislation sponsored by Rep. Salazar to be signed into law, further cementing her role as a national leader in the fight to safeguard Americans—especially women and minors—from digital abuse. Other key policies sponsored by Rep. Salazar that have been enacted into law include:
###
Source: Government of India
Source: Government of India (4)
Union Minister for Power and Housing & Urban Affairs, Manohar Lal, led the Indian delegation at the BRICS energy ministers’ meeting held in Brasília, Brazil, under the country’s ongoing presidency. The meeting was convened under the theme “Strengthening Global South Cooperation for More Inclusive and Sustainable Governance.”
During his address, the minister highlighted energy security as one of the most pressing global challenges and emphasized the urgent need to deepen BRICS cooperation to ensure economic stability, sustainability, and equitable access to energy resources. He reaffirmed India’s strong commitment to building a sustainable and inclusive energy future and commended Brazil’s leadership in advancing the collective energy agenda of the Global South.
Showcasing India’s rapid progress in clean energy development, Lal noted a 90 percent increase in electricity generation capacity over the past decade, reaching 475 GW in 2025, with a national target of 900 GW by 2032. He said that India had become the world’s third-largest producer of solar and wind energy and was progressing steadily toward its Nationally Determined Contributions.
Lal also highlighted India’s achievement of a 20 percent ethanol blending milestone, underlining its role in advancing biofuel adoption and emissions reduction. The country is also investing heavily in smart grid infrastructure, advanced metering systems, and expanded transmission networks, including the Green Energy Corridor.
Additionally, India has set ambitious goals for green hydrogen and nuclear energy, including a target of 100 GW of nuclear capacity by 2047. The recent launch of a domestic Carbon Credit Market was also mentioned, with the minister inviting global collaboration in this initiative.
Lal underlined the importance of energy efficiency and sustainable infrastructure development through programs such as the Energy Conservation Sustainable Buildings Code, rooftop solar initiatives, and improved standards for energy-efficient appliances. He further emphasized the role of the Global Biofuels Alliance in enhancing international cooperation in the biofuels sector.
While advocating for clean energy, the minister also acknowledged the continuing role of fossil fuels in the global energy mix, particularly for developing countries. He called for greater international cooperation in promoting cleaner and more efficient use of fossil fuels through technologies such as coal gasification, carbon capture and storage, and green chemical innovations.
Lal extended an invitation to the BRICS nations to participate in the next BRICS Energy Gathering, which is scheduled to be hosted by India in 2026. He reaffirmed India’s commitment to leading the energy dialogue for the Global South and to building a collaborative path toward a more secure, inclusive, and sustainable energy future.
Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments
Mass loss from ice sheets in Greenland and Antarctica has quadrupled since the 1990s. It’s now the main source of global mean sea-level rise from the cryosphere.
The stability of ice sheets is critical to predicting sea level rise. A new synthesis published in Communications Earth and Environment brings together multiple lines of evidence to show that +1.5C is too high, and that even the current increase (about 1.2C) – if sustained – is likely to generate several metres of sea-level rise over the coming centuries. This would cause extensive loss and damage to coastal populations. The authors argue that avoiding this requires a global average temperature cooler than present.
Journalists came to this online briefing to hear the authors present their work and answer their questions on the threats of polar ice melt.
Speakers included:
Prof Chris Stokes, Glaciologist, Durham University
Prof Jonathan Bamber, Director of the Bristol Glaciology Centre, University of Bristol
Translation. Region: Russian Federal
Source: Rosneft – Rosneft – An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.
Rosneft conducted two scientific expeditions to study the populations of polar bears and marine mammals in the Kara Sea. Specialists from the A.N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution took part in the field work in the north of Krasnoyarsk Krai and on the Yamal Peninsula. The main goal of the research was a full-scale census, assessment of the distribution of polar bears and marine mammals using instrumental (photo and infrared aerial photography) and aerovisual methods.
The expeditions are carried out within the framework of Rosneft’s corporate program for the conservation of Arctic biodiversity, called “Tamura”. The polar bear is a bioindicator species. Based on the health of these endangered predators, scientists draw conclusions about the sustainability of northern ecosystems as a whole.
Eight flights of the AN-28 laboratory aircraft were made from the village of Sabetta in Yamal for a comprehensive survey of the inner delta of the Gulf of Ob and the southeastern part of the Kara Sea. The total length of the routes was almost 10 thousand km, more than 90 thousand images were taken, which will be processed using neural network algorithms. During the aerial visual observations, 22 polar bears, 23 walruses, 616 seals, 77 belugas, as well as rare bird species were recorded.
Ten flights of the Mi-8MTV-1 helicopter were made from the village of Dikson to survey the ice of a number of islands, as well as the ice in the Yenisei Gulf to Sever Bay and along the northern coast of the Taimyr Peninsula to the mouth of the Uboynaya River. The length of the routes was almost 5 thousand km. During the work, 37 polar bears of various ages and both sexes were registered. Fifteen adult bears were captured, 10 animals were tagged with satellite collars and ear tags for remote tracking of migration routes. Scientists also took blood samples and fur samples from polar bears to study their health and genetic affiliation to a particular subpopulation.
Reference:
Rosneft and the Russian Ministry of Natural Resources continue research work in the Arctic region as part of the national project “Ecology”. From 2024 to 2027, Rosneft plans to conduct research work in the north of Krasnoyarsk Krai and the Kara Sea.
In 2024, the Company’s Arctic Research Center organized 5 expeditions, during which scientists studied the Kara subpopulation of polar bears, wild reindeer, and rare bird species. The total length of air routes was almost 17,000 km, and water routes – more than 3,000 km.
Department of Information and Advertising of PJSC NK Rosneft May 20, 2025
Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.
Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments
In response to the arrival of a solitary dolphin in Lyme Regis and observation of potential marine wildlife disturbances, MMO and Dorset Wildlife Trust are issuing guidance under the banner of Operation Seabird.
Dolphin at Lyme Regis
A solitary bottlenose dolphin has become a frequent visitor to the area just outside Lyme Regis harbour, sparking excitement from both residents and visitors. However, marine wildlife bodies and conservation authorities are issuing guidance following direct observation, reports, and video of people intentionally approaching the animal too closely.
The Marine Management Organisation (MMO) and Dorset Wildlife Trust remind everyone that dolphins, whales and porpoises are protected by law. It is an offence to intentionally approach or recklessly disturb these animals and could result in up to six months in prison and/or an unlimited fine.
Although seeing dolphins in the wild can be a special experience, irresponsible behaviour, particularly from those swimming, paddleboarding, jet-skiing or operating watercraft, can place the animal, or yourself at risk.
The arrival of a dolphin in a small coastal community like Lyme Regis can be a source of wonder and pride. But it’s vital to remember that dolphins are vulnerable and unpredictable wild animals protected by law. We all have a responsibility to respect their space, keep a safe distance, and understand how our actions can unintentionally cause harm or even constitute a criminal offence. By giving these animals space, observing them from a distance and acting responsibly we help ensure their health and survival, so they remain a part of our coast now and for generations to come.
If you encounter a Dolphin when you’re on the water, you should:
Sometimes dolphins may choose to approach you, in this situation you should maintain a steady speed and direction and let the animals leave when they choose.
If you see a dolphin being disturbed, you can:
Disturbance can be a big problem for wildlife from seabirds to seals and dolphins. It can affect their natural behaviour, interfering with foraging, disturbing crucial resting time, causing stress and may result in injuries or worse. That’s why it’s so important to follow the Marine and Coastal Wildlife Code, so you can enjoy your time on the water without having a detrimental impact on our precious marine wildlife.
Find out more: www.gov.uk/government/publications/marine-and-coastal-wildlife-code
This guidance comes under the banner of Operation Seabird #OpsSeabird – a national initiative which aims to tackle marine coastal wildlife crime, wildlife disturbance, anti-social behaviour and promote responsible wildlife watching. Associates of the program engage and educate the public and local stakeholders about how to enjoy our coastal habitats while minimising negative impacts on our marine wildlife.
The police may ask you:
‘Protecting Lyme Regis’ Dolphin visitor and avoid wildlife offences’
The Marine Management Organisation (MMO) is inviting residents, water users and business owners to a free community workshop tackling the issue of marine wildlife disturbance in Lyme Regis.
With a solitary bottlenose dolphin now a regular visitor to the harbour area, join us to learn how we can all help protect this special animal, stay within the law, and ensure everyone can enjoy the coast responsibly and safely.
Find out what disturbance looks like, what the law says, and how to avoid unintentionally causing harm — or committing an offence.
Let’s work together to keep Lyme Regis a safe and welcoming place for wildlife and people alike.
Lyme Regis Harbour
Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region
The Deputy Chief Secretary for Administration, Mr Cheuk Wing-hing, today (May 20) held a press conference to announce nine projects to be implemented by the Working Group on Developing Tourist Hotspots (Working Group). Also attending the press conference were the Secretary for Culture, Sports and Tourism, Miss Rosanna Law; the Under Secretary for Security, Mr Michael Cheuk; the Under Secretary for Home and Youth Affairs, Mr Clarence Leung; the Under Secretary for Environment and Ecology, Miss Diane Wong; the Under Secretary for Development, Mr David Lam; and the Commissioner for Tourism, Mrs Angelina Cheung.
Mr Cheuk said, “New travel patterns and tourists’ preferences increasingly value hotspots with unique features that are part of the flavour of Hong Kong. As there are many treasured tourist attractions in Hong Kong, we consider that in addition to creating new hotspots, current tourism resources should be consolidated and enriched to maximise the value of these hotspots and create attractions that tourists cannot miss.
“The Working Group has gathered opinions from different sectors of the community and considered different proposals. From the many options, we have at this stage selected nine appealing and feasible projects that can be implemented within a short period. Through upgrades of hardware and software, renovations and enhancements, maintenance and renewal of attractions, provision of ancillary services and facilities as well as opening up places that have not been open to the public before, tourists will be offered new experiences that are more in-depth and fascinating.”
The nine projects to be implemented are:
1. Hong Kong Industrial Brand Tourism
Hong Kong’s industrial story fully embodies the spirit of the Lion Rock. The tourism industry is forming groups to develop “Made in Hong Kong” industrial tourism, creating hotspots for visitors to tour, experience and shop. Industrial brands that can be visited include Lee Kum Kee, Kee Wah, Pat Chun and Yakult. A trial launch is expected in the third quarter of this year.
2. Victoria Park Bazaar
3. Creating a Pink Trumpet Tree Garden
4. Featured community – In-depth travel in Old Town Central
5. Featured community – In-depth travel in Kowloon City
6. Disciplinary Services Pioneer Tours
7. Opening of the Former Yau Ma Tei Police Station
8. “Four Peaks” Tourism
9. Revistalising the Former Hung Hom Railway Freight Yard Pier
“The above hotspots span across the territory, underlining the concept of ‘tourism is everywhere in Hong Kong’. There are indoor and outdoor hotspots, locales for visits and explorations, as well as places for enjoying the ecology and scenery. They cater for travellers’ individual preferences, which can easily fit in different travelling routes for creating pleasant journeys. Hong Kong will gain in popularity and prosperity as the hotspots will bring economic benefits, boost consumption sentiment and stimulate the economy,” Mr Cheuk said.
“The Government will engage the trade proactively, making good use of various resources for marketing and promotions, creating innovative travelling routes and new products for tourist groups. This new initiative will capitalise on the characteristics of different tourist hotspots, to enhance their attractiveness. With concerted efforts, I firmly believe Hong Kong’s tourism industry will attain a new level of prosperity.”
The Chief Executive announced in the 2024 Policy Address that a Working Group on Developing Tourist Hotspots will be set up, and the Deputy Chief Secretary for Administration will be the leader. The Working Group aims to strengthen cross-departmental co-ordination and leverage community efforts, identify and develop tourist hotspots of high popularity and with strong appeal in various districts. Other members of the Working Group include the Secretary for Culture, Sports and Tourism (deputy leader), the Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development, the Secretary for Development, the Secretary for Environment and Ecology, the Secretary for Home and Youth Affairs, the Secretary for Security, the Secretary for Transport and Logistics, the Director of Home Affairs, the Director of Leisure and Cultural Services and the Commissioner for Tourism.
Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News
Giant panda Liang Liang feeds on bamboo at the China Conservation and Research Centre for the Giant Panda in Bifengxia of Ya’an, Southwest China’s Sichuan province, May 18, 2025. [Photo/Xinhua]
After spending 11 years in Malaysia, giant panda pair Fu Wa and Feng Yi were returned to the Ya’an base of the China Conservation and Research Center for the Giant Panda in Sichuan province on Sunday evening, the center said.
Known as Xing Xing and Liang Liang in Malaysia, the pandas were accompanied on the journey by Malaysian keepers and an experienced veterinarian from the panda center. The veterinarian had traveled to Malaysia in advance to conduct routine health checks and assessments with local veterinary experts.
The pandas will undergo quarantine at the center’s Ya’an base for at least one month.
Known as Fu Wa and Feng Yi in China, they were both born on Aug 23, 2006, at the panda center. They were sent to Zoo Negara Malaysia in 2014 as part of a 10-year giant panda international cooperation program that coincided with the 40th anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic relations between China and Malaysia.
Under an agreement signed between China and Malaysia last year, the cooperation period, which had been set to end on May 20, 2024, was extended by one year.
As the first pair of giant pandas to live in Malaysia, Fu Wa and Feng Yi became well-known animal celebrities and helped foster people-to-people exchanges between the two countries, the center said.
Over the years, the center and Zoo Negara Malaysia engaged in in-depth cooperation on giant panda conservation and breeding, disease prevention and control, public education and employee exchanges.
During their time in Malaysia, the panda pair gave birth to three cubs — Nuan Nuan, Yi Yi and Sheng Yi. By August 2023, all three cubs had been sent to China and are currently in good health, according to the center.
In preparation for the return of Fu Wa and Feng Yi, the Ya’an base made comprehensive arrangements, including organizing quarantine facilities, deploying workers, stocking food and setting up a health monitoring system, to ensure a smooth transition and quick adaptation to their new environment.
The center said Fu Wa and Feng Yi will meet the public at an appropriate time. Until then, updates on their daily lives will be shared through the center’s official platforms.
China and Malaysia are expected to launch a new round of giant panda conservation cooperation within this year, according to the center.
Giant panda Xing Xing feeds on bamboo at the China Conservation and Research Centre for the Giant Panda in Bifengxia of Ya’an, southwest China’s Sichuan province, May 18, 2025. [Photo/Xinhua]
From the 1990s through the end of last year, China conducted panda conservation cooperation programs with 26 institutions in 20 countries, according to the National Forestry and Grassland Administration.
Most pandas returning from overseas reside either at the Ya’an base or the Chengdu Research Base of Giant Panda Breeding.
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Justine Bell-James, Professor, TC Beirne School of Law, The University of Queensland
New federal Environment Minister Murray Watt is in Western Australia this week to reboot nature law reform. Reform stalled in the Senate last term, following stiff opposition from the state’s Labor government and mining sector.
Watt has a big task ahead of him. Labor came into power in 2022 promising large-scale law reform to reverse Australia’s alarming rate of biodiversity loss.
But former environment minister Tanya Plibersek’s tenure ended with Australia’s nature laws in even worse shape than when she started. A last-minute amendment intended to protect salmon farming in Tasmania now limits the government’s power to reconsider certain environment approvals, even when an activity is harming the environment.
But a new leader for the Greens and the Liberals in this term of parliament means Labor’s important push for reform may have better prospects.
When Plibersek announced Labor’s “Nature Positive Plan” in 2022, she committed to a massive overhaul of Australia’s Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act (EPBC Act).
The ambitious plan involved creating an independent national environment protection agency to enforce national environmental standards. Setting such standards was recommended by the 2020 Samuel Review of the EPBC Act. If legislated, the standards would shift decision-making under the act from being a highly discretionary process to one focused on outcomes for the environment.
An early draft of the new legislation was presented to key stakeholders at closed-door consultation sessions. They included environmental non-government organisations, research groups and peak bodies for the minerals and development sectors. The draft did a pretty good job of capturing the components of the Nature Positive Plan.
However, Plibersek’s proposal was unpopular with some, including WA Premier Roger Cook and the mining lobby. Freedom of Information laws revealed major players in the mining sector wrote to Prime Minister Anthony Albanese asking him to intervene.
In the face of these difficulties, Plibersek pivoted. In April 2024, she announced nature reforms would instead be delivered in three phases. The first was the Nature Repair Market, which had already been legislated. The second was three bills to be introduced to parliament. The third phase would happen at some point in the future.
The bills sought to create two new bodies, Environment Protection Australia and Environment Information Australia, to inform decision-making. A third bill contained some improved compliance and enforcement mechanisms. However, the centrepiece of the initial reforms – the new environmental standards themselves – were missing. This sparked criticism, as the EPA would simply be enforcing the same ineffective laws that currently exist, and would not have project approval powers until some later amendments were passed.
Presumably, Plibersek switched to a three-stage process hoping the stage-two bills would pass through parliament with a minimum of dissent. This would leave the more contentious standards as a problem to be dealt with further down the track.
However, even the watered-down proposal was unpopular. The bill stalled in the Senate, criticised as both too weak and too strong by opposite sides of the political spectrum. And once again, the mining lobby intervened. Albanese signalled a willingness to remove approval powers from the EPA, leaving decisions with the minister.
Plibersek eventually managed to secure support from the Greens to get the bills through the Senate, but Albanese killed the deal at the eleventh hour in November last year. At the time, Labor’s prospects for the federal election were looking shaky, and Albanese saw the decision as a way to shore up support in WA.
The failure of the Nature Positive Reforms in Labor’s first term came down to one crucial factor: politics. With a fresh election win, a decisive majority, and a new environment minister, will things be different?
In his first interviews after winning the election, Albanese said he wants a federal environmental protection agency that “supports industry, but also supports sustainability”. This suggests there may be a green light for Watt to at least push for this aspect of the reforms to be revived.
What about the more ambitious parts of the reform, including National Environmental Standards? This is something Watt could potentially push for.
In an interview on Monday, Watt said both options are on the table: widespread reform, or the pared-down version Plibersek took to parliament. Watt said he wants “to approach the reforms in the spirit of Graeme Samuel’s recommendations”, which suggests he’s open to new standards.
Indeed, when new Opposition Leader Sussan Ley was environment minister, she tried to push through legislation incorporating similar standards. Watt could use this to garner crossbench support.
Watt also has a new Greens leader with whom to negotiate. Senator Larissa Waters, a former environmental lawyer, understands the complexity of the EPBC Act better than most.
With the Greens holding the balance of power in the Senate, Waters might push for any proposed laws to be strengthened – perhaps by bringing back the standards.
Watt said he will reach out to Ley and the Greens to see if they’re “prepared to work with us to get these reforms passed”.
At this stage, Watt is resisting pressure to rule out giving a future EPA the power to approve major resources projects. Everything is still up for discussion.
Ahead of Tuesday’s meeting, Cook said he would push Watt to consult widely before making any decisions and avoid duplicating existing state laws.
Watt says his job now is to listen, before finding a way forward. But “the very biggest priority is to pass these reforms”, this term, whatever it takes.
Justine Bell-James receives funding from the Australian Research Council, the Great Barrier Reef Foundation, the Queensland Government, and the National Environmental Science Program. She is a Director of the National Environmental Law Association and a member of the Wentworth Group of Concerned Scientists.
– ref. Can Murray Watt fix Australia’s broken nature laws? First stop, Western Australia – https://theconversation.com/can-murray-watt-fix-australias-broken-nature-laws-first-stop-western-australia-257000
Source: Govt’s austerity Budget to cause real harm in communities
PETITIONS, PAPERS, SELECT COMMITTEE REPORTS, AND INTRODUCTION OF BILLS
SPEAKER: A petition has been delivered to the Clerk for presentation.
CLERK: Petition of Social Justice Aotearoa requesting that the House initiate a select committee inquiry into the performance and structure of the Independent Police Conduct Authority.
SPEAKER: That petition stands referred to the Petitions Committee. Ministers have delivered four papers for presentation.
CLERK: Government responses to the petition of the Hon Julie Anne Genter, the petition of Maher Nazzal, the petition of Shinichi Yamada, and the report of the Petitions Committee on the petition of Alison White.
SPEAKER: Those papers are published under the authority of the House. Eighteen select committee reports have been delivered for presentation.
CLERK:
SPEAKER: The bills are set down for second reading, and the briefings and activities reports are set down for consideration. The Clerk has been informed of the introduction of two bills.
CLERK:
SPEAKER: Those bills are set down for first reading. We come now to oral questions.
ER Report: Here is a summary of significant articles published on EveningReport.nz on May 20, 2025.
Can you treat headaches with physiotherapy? Here’s what the research says
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Zhiqi Liang, Lecturer in Physiotherapy, The University of Queensland BaanTaksinStudio/Shutterstock You might’ve noticed some physiotherapists advertise they offer treatments for headaches and wondered: would that work? In fact, there’s a solid body of research showing that physiotherapy treatments can be really helpful for certain types of headache.
NZ joins call for Israel to allow full resumption of aid to Gaza
New Zealand has joined 22 other countries and the European Union in calling for Israel to allow a full resumption of aid into Gaza immediately. The partners also said Israel must enable the United Nations and humanitarian organisations to work independently and impartially “to save lives, reduce suffering, and maintain dignity.” Israel imposed a blockade
Can cats drink milk? Despite the stereotypes, it’s actually a bad idea
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Julia Henning, PhD Candidate in Feline Behaviour, School of Animal and Veterinary Science, University of Adelaide Shawn Rain/Unsplash Cats have a long history with humans, going back more than 9,000 years. Attracted to human settlements by the rodents that plagued (sometimes literally) our ancestors, cats ingratiated themselves
Boredom gets a bad rap. But science says it can actually be good for us
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michelle Kennedy, Youth Mental Health Researcher, University of the Sunshine Coast We have all experienced boredom – that feeling of waning interest or decreased mental stimulation. Eventually we lose focus, we disengage. Time seems to pass slowly, and we may even start to feel restless. Whether it
15 years ago, I urged the AFL to launch a mental health round. Now it’s time for action
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Pat McGorry, Professor of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne The death of former AFL footballer Adam Selwood, less than four months after the death by suicide of his twin Troy, is an unfathomable tragedy for the Selwood family. The devastating news has sent shockwaves through the AFL
Does drawing on memory help us solve problems? Our experiment gave some surprising answers
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Anne Macaskill, Senior Lecturer in Experimental Psychology, Te Herenga Waka — Victoria University of Wellington Getty Images Conventional wisdom suggests memories of past experiences can help us navigate problems in the present. For example, if a friend told you they were having a disagreement with their partner,
Speight’s Fiji coup had more to do with power, greed than iTaukei rights, says Chaudhry
Today marks the 25th anniversary of the May 19, 2000, coup led by renegade businessman George Speight. The deposed Prime Minister, Mahendra Chaudhry, says Speight’s motive had less to do with indigenous rights and a lot more to do with power, greed, and access to the millions likely to accrue from Fiji’s mahogany plantation. On
The federal government wants to boost productivity. Science can help
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Deanna D’Alessandro, Professor & Director, Net Zero Institute, University of Sydney Daniel Sone/National Cancer Institute In the wake of Labor’s resounding victory in Australia’s federal election earlier this month, there has been much talk about flailing productivity in Australia. In fact, last week, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese
Fish driving cars and chimps doing maths: what teaching animals ‘irrelevant’ skills reveals about our own minds
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Scarlett Howard, Research Fellow, School of Biological Sciences, Monash University VixtorPhoto / Shutterstock Did you know goldfish can learn to drive cars? Have you heard bumblebees can learn to pull on a string? Would you believe some primates can perform calculations with Arabic numerals? These tasks seem
Surviving swamps on South Australia’s parched Fleurieu Peninsula are a lifeline to wildlife – and farmers
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Christopher Auricht, Visiting Research Fellow in Natural Resources Management, University of Adelaide Yundi Nature Conservancy, CC BY-NC-ND South Australia is famously the driest state on the driest inhabited continent. But even for South Australia, the current drought is extreme. Rainfall has been the lowest on record across
‘No pain, no gain’: why some primary students are following intense study routines
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Christina Ho, Associate professor in Social and Political Sciences, University of Technology Sydney MNStudio/ Shutterstock Every year, thousands of New South Wales students sit a test to determine places for highly sought-after selective high schools. These are academically selective public schools often associated with high Year 12
NZ Budget 2025: anything less than a 5% increase in health funding amounts to merely standing still
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Tim Tenbensel, Professor of Health Policy, University of Auckland, Waipapa Taumata Rau Health Minister Simeon Brown. Hagen Hopkins/Getty Images Minister of Health Simeon Brown claimed earlier this year that health funding in New Zealand has never been higher and that suggestions of underfunding are “fake news”. On
From the Liver King to ultramarathons, fitness influencers are glorifying extreme masculinity where ‘pain is the point’
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Samuel Cornell, PhD Candidate in Public Health & Community Medicine, School of Population Health, UNSW Sydney Netflix/Untold: The Liver King A new Netflix documentary about a shirtless supplement salesman who claimed to be “natural” and was exposed as a fraud might seem like a punchline. But Untold:
Former Canberra diplomat Ali Kuzak dies on the way to Palestine
Ali Kazak: born Haifa, 1947; died May 17 2025, Thailand By Helen Musa in Canberra Former Palestinian diplomat and long-time Canberra identity Ali Kazak died on Saturday en route to Palestine. Sources at the Canberra Islamic Centre report that he was recovering from heart surgery and died during a stopover in Thailand. Kazak was born
Environmentalists question Henry Puna’s role in deep sea mining firm
By Caleb Fotheringham, RNZ Pacific journalist Environmentalists in the Cook Islands have criticised former Prime Minister and Pacific Islands Forum (PIF) head Henry Puna for joining the board of a deep sea mining company. Puna, who finished his term as PIF secretary-general in May last year, played a pivotal part in the creation of multi-use
Legal News – Former NZ Associate Minister Of Foreign Affairs Calls On NZ Government To Uphold International Law Over US Designation of Cuba
Source: Hon Matthew Robson Former NZ Associate Minister Of Foreign Affairs, Hon Matt Robson, has called on the New Zealand Government to uphold International Law. “New Zealand prides itself on being in the forefront of countries supporting the international rule of law and not the international rule of might ”, said former Associate Foreign Minister
Climate scientists are trusted globally, just not as much as other scientists – here’s why
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Omid Ghasemi, Research Associate in Behavioural Science at the Institute for Climate Risk & Response, UNSW Sydney I. Noyan Yilmaz, Shutterstock Societies increasingly rely on scientists to guide decisions in times of uncertainty, from pandemic outbreaks to the rise of artificial intelligence. Addressing climate change is no
Joe Biden has advanced prostate cancer with a Gleason score of 9. What does this mean?
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Sarah Diepstraten, Senior Research Officer, Blood Cells and Blood Cancer Division, WEHI (Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research) Former US President Joe Biden has been diagnosed with an aggressive form of prostate cancer that has already spread to his bones. A statement Biden’s office issued
Open letter from John Cusack: ‘The children of Gaza need your outrage – end the siege’
Pacific Media Watch American film star celebrity John Cusack, who describes himself on his x-page bio as an “apocalyptic shit-disturber”, has posted an open letter to the world denouncing the Israeli “mass murder” in Gaza and calling for “your outrage”. While warning the public to “don’t stop talking about Palestine/Gaza”, he says that the “hollow
Russia is labelling Oscar Jenkins a ‘mercenary’, not a prisoner of war. What’s the difference – and why does this matter?
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Shannon Bosch, Associate Professor (Law), Edith Cowan University Oscar Jenkins, a 33-year-old former teacher from Melbourne, was one of many foreigners who responded to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky’s call in 2022 for volunteers to join Ukraine’s armed forces to help repel Russia’s invasion. In early 2024, Jenkins
US Senate News:
Source: United States Senator Kevin Cramer (R-ND)
BISMARCK, N.D. – On President Trump’s “Liberation Day” last month, he argued non-tariff trade barriers are often more damaging to America’s competitiveness than actual tariffs imposed by foreign governments. He rightly called out unfair practices like currency manipulation, export subsidies, and intellectual property theft. But one often-overlooked offense stands out: lax environmental standards, enforcement, and compliance.
In his remarks, the President blasted other countries for accusing America of committing environmental crimes and demanding that our producers pay for damages for which they were not responsible. U.S. Senator Kevin Cramer (R-ND), member of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, penned an op-ed in RealClearEnergy, arguing for an America First approach to foreign pollution, and that the rules we impose on ourselves reflect our stewardship values. If countries want access to our markets they should abide by our standards, and we shouldn’t devolve to theirs.
If Countries Want Access to Our Markets, They Must Abide By Our Standards
RealClearEnergy – May 19, 2024
On President Trump’s “Liberation Day,” he argued non-tariff trade barriers are often more damaging to America’s competitiveness than actual tariffs imposed by foreign governments.
The President called out several unfair practices used to create an artificial advantage in trade – currency manipulation, export subsidies, intellectual property theft, exorbitant value-added taxes, and unfair rules. But one often-overlooked offense stands out: lax environmental standards, enforcement, and compliance. He is right to pinpoint this disparity as it undermines U.S. competitiveness and directly harms the wellbeing of Americans.
Emissions from industrial activities across the Pacific, particularly in China, contribute up to 30% of surface ozone and 20% of fine particulate matter in the western U.S., making it more difficult for states to meet their air quality targets under the Clean Air Act. In addition, mercury pollution from coal-fired plants in Asia accounts for 20 to 40% of mercury deposition in the West.
If American facilities fail to comply with our environmental statutes, a state’s federal highway funds can be withheld, or strict regulatory constraints impacting the permitting and investment of new industrial facilities could be imposed. This is why U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Lee Zeldin recently announced the removal of red tape that placed excessive burden on states’ ability to prove their pollution problem was linked to foreign sources. He understands Americans should not be punished for another country’s’ pollution.
U.S. companies work hard to meet EPA requirements. They spend hundreds of billions on environmental compliance, with our manufacturing and energy-intensive sectors bearing the highest burden. A National Association of Manufacturers’ report found the average U.S. producer pays over $10,000 per employee annually on meeting environmental standards.
When a regulation’s costs outweigh its public benefits, it should be eliminated. But Americans live by the old Boy Scout adage to “leave this world a little better than you found it.” We want safe environments for our workers, clean air and water, and for our innovators to create more efficient ways to produce more in America. The rules we impose on ourselves reflect our stewardship values. If countries want access to our markets they should abide by our standards, and we shouldn’t devolve to theirs.
“Free-trade-at-any-cost” idealogues portend all commodities are created equal, as if there isn’t intrinsic value in where a product is made. In their mind, a barrel of Russian or Iranian oil is the same as one out of North Dakota or Alaska, or a rod of Chinese steel is no different than one out of Cleveland or Pittsburgh. Never mind these foreign producers are dirtier, use their profits to promulgate foreign wars, and exploit abhorrent labor standards.
In his remarks, the President blasted other countries for accusing America of committing environmental crimes and demanding that our producers pay for damages for which they were not responsible.
He’s right to decry this hypocrisy and I’m committed to working with him to hold overseas polluters accountable.
Last Congress, Sen. Chris Coons (D-DE) and I introduced the PROVE IT Act, which would require the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) to develop a dataset to compare the relative carbon efficiency of U.S. production to our foreign competitors. Existing data compiled by the Climate Leadership Council already shows the United States has a clear carbon advantage over its competitors. While the idea of using carbon as a metric might confuse those who seek to punish overseas producers for traditional pollutants, it serves as an excellent proxy for actual emissions.
On paper, China’s environmental regulatory regime appears reasonable, but enforcement and compliance suffer from corruption that results in cheating. Chinese companies, especially coal-fired power plants and heavy industries, have been documented turning off or bypassing pollution scrubbers to cut costs. Our bill requires DOE to strictly review foreign data to make sure this type of cheating isn’t tolerated.
The President is right to focus on the effects of unfair trade practices to level the playing field. An America First approach on foreign pollution, however, can do much more – it can rewrite the script on how conservatives view U.S. environmental progress.
Paired with effective trade measures that hold overseas polluters accountable, we can monetize the superior environmental performance of our workers and industry and protect public health. At the same time, we can create a durable and transparent trade agenda that not only encourages domestic investment in manufacturing but also cleans up the global environment.
Global demand for virtually everything is growing. If we want cleaner, more secure supply chains, we won’t get there by punishing ourselves. The solution is recognizing our excellence and making more in America!
President Trump gets this. But first, we need the comparative emissions data authorized by the PROVE IT Act to determine the scope of this unfair trade practice and to help understand the impact of foreign pollution on America.
US Senate News:
Source: United States Senator Jacky Rosen (D-NV)
WASHINGTON, DC – Today, U.S. Senators Jacky Rosen (D-NV) and Catherine Cortez Masto (D-NV) announced that they have secured $981,241 in federal funding through the State Wildlife Grant Program to protect, manage, and address wildlife conservation needs across Nevada. This funding, which is administered by state agencies, will go toward implementing Nevada’s Wildlife Action Plan.
“Nevada is home to an incredible and diverse range of wildlife that rely on our beautiful outdoors for their critically important habitats,” said Senator Rosen. “I helped secure this federal funding to further protect our natural landscapes from ever-increasing threats like climate change, drought, and wildfires.”
“Our state’s wildlife and their habitats are part of what makes Nevada a great place to live and visit,” said Senator Cortez Masto. “I’m proud to have helped secure the necessary funding to help our wildlife agencies in their conservation efforts.”
Since 2000, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s Office of Conservation Investment has distributed over $1 billion to states, territories, commonwealths, and D.C. through the State Wildlife Grant Program. Funds are used by state fish and wildlife agencies for developing and implementing programs that benefit wildlife and their habitats, including species that are not hunted or fished. Grant funds may be used to address a variety of conservation needs, such as research, fish and wildlife surveys, species restoration, habitat management, and monitoring.
Senators Rosen and Cortez Masto are strong supporters of wildlife conservation in Nevada. Each year, they request funding for the State Wildlife Grant Program to make sure Nevada has the resources it needs to protect, manage, and promote wildlife conservation.
